Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2011-11-28 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETTukwila City Council Agenda COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Jim Haggerton, Mayor Councilmembers: Joe Duff ie Joan Hernandez David Cline, City Administrator Dennis Robertson Verna Seal Allan Ekberg, Council President Kathy Hougardy De'Sean Quinn Monday, November 28, 2011, 5:00 PM *Special Time* Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CITIZEN COMMENT At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included on this agenda (please limit your comments to five minutes per citizen). To comment on an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is presented for discussion. 3. PUBLIC HEARING Budget and Capital Improvement Program: Pg.1 (1) An ordinance amending the 2011 -2012 budget. Pg.9 (2) A resolution adopting the 2012 -2017 Financial Planning Model and Pg.33 Capital Improvement Program. 4. SPECIAL a. Budget and Capital Improvement Program: Pg.1 ISSUES (1) An ordinance amending the 2011 -2012 budget. Pg.9 (2) A resolution adopting the 2012 -2017 Financial Planning Model and Pg.33 Capital Improvement Program. b. A resolution establishing a new Finance Change Fund. Pg.35 c. An ordinance regarding refunding 2003 bonds. Pg.45 d. An ordinance banning solicitation in certain parts of the City. Pg.71 e. An ordinance repealing a portion of Ordinance No. 2323 regarding Pg.155 social card rooms. f. Acceptance of State and Federal grants for the Tukwila Urban Center Pg.161 Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge. g. Supplement #9 with KPFF for the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian/ Pg.169 Bicycle Bridge. h. A resolution adopting a new Public Works fee schedule. Pg.247 i. An agreement for the 2012 Small Drainage Program. Pg.273 j. An amendment to the agreement with Cascade Water Alliance. Pg.291 k. Purchase of a thermoplastic striper for the Street Department. Pg.363 I. Purchase of 250 Leotek LED luminaires for the Street Department's Pg.371 traffic control devices. m. Supplement #13 with IBI Group for the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Pg.379 Center. n. Supplement #14 with IBI Group for Andover Park West Street and Pg.405 Water Improvements. o. An ordinance for acquisition of right -of -way and easements for the Pg.425 Tukwila Transit Center. (continued...) x COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING Monday, November 28, 2011 Page 2 4. SPECIAL p. A transfer of right -of -way for the Tukwila Urban Center Access Pg.451 ISSUES (Klickitat) Project between the Washington State Department of (continued) Transportation and the City of Tukwila. 5. REPORTS a. Mayor b. City Council c. Staff d. City Attorney e. Intergovernmental 6. MISCELLANEOUS 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION S. ADJOURNMENT Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible. Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice to the City Clerk's Office (206- 433 -1800 or tukclerk @tukwilawa.gov). This notice is available at www.tukwilawa.aov, and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities. Tukwila Council meetings are audio taped. HOW TO TESTIFY If you would like to address the Council, please go to the podium and state your name and address clearly for the record. Please observe the basic rules of courtesy when speaking and limit your continents to five minutes. The Council appreciates hearing from citizens but may not be able to take immediate action on continents received until they are referred to a Committee or discussed under New Business. COUNCIL MEETINGS No Council meetings are scheduled on the 5th Monday of the month unless prior public notification is given. Regular Meetings The Mayor, elected by the people to a four -year term, presides at all Regular Council Meetings held on the 1st and 3rd Mondays of each month at 7:00 p.m. Official Council action in the form of formal motions, adopting of resolutions and passing of ordinances can only be taken at Regular Council meetings. Committee of the Whole Meetings Council members are elected for a four -year term. The Council President is elected by the Council members to preside at all Committee of the Whole meetings for a one -year term. Committee of the Whole meetings are held the 2nd and 4th Mondays at 7:00 p.m. Issues discussed are forwarded to the Regular Council meeting for official action. GENERAL INFORMATION At each Council meeting citizens are given the opportunity to address the Council on items that are not included on the agenda during CITIZENS COMMENTS. Please limit your comments to 5 minutes. Special Meetings may be called at any time with proper public notice. Procedures followed are the same as those used in Regular Council meetings. Executive Sessions may be called to inform the Council of pending legal action, financial, or personnel matters. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearings are required by law before the Council can take action on matters affecting the public interest such as land -use laws, annexations, rezone requests, public safety issues, etc. Section 2.04.150 of the Tukwila Municipal Code states the following guidelines for Public Hearings: The proponent shall speak first and is allowed 15 minutes for a presentation. 2. The opponent is then allowed 15 minutes to make a presentation. Each side is then allowed 5 minutes for rebuttal. 4. Citizens who wish to address the Council may speak for 5 minutes each. No one may speak a second time until everyone wishing to speak has spoken. 5. After each speaker has spoken, the Council may question the speaker. Each speaker can respond to the question, but may not engage in further debate at this time. 6. After the Public Hearing is closed and during the Council meeting, the Council may choose to discuss the issue among themselves, or defer the discussion to a future Council meeting, without further public testimony. Council action may only be taken during Regular or Special Meetings. COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS I CAS NUI\ BI "x: AGI:i',NDA I j ;,m, TI "I7.I Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor's reviem 11/28/11 PM C_ 12/05/11 PM ITEM INFORMATION STAFF SPONSOR: PEGGY MCCARTHY An ordinance amending the 2011 -2012 budget. ITEM NO. Coue icil revien 3 (1) 4.A (1) I OIZIGINAi-,AGI "NDADA'f'],: 11/28/11 ®,Diecu.rrion Motion ❑Resolution ®Ordinance Bid Award ®Public Hearin Otl)er M/ Dale 11128111 lltg Da <e l7tg Date D1tg Date 12/5/11 A/V Date Mtg Date 11/28/11 Mtg Date SPONSOR Council Lltlayor HR DCD .Finance Fire [:]IT P&R Police PIV SPONSOR'S The ordinance approves the 2011 -2012 mid biennium budget amendments. The mid Sun- MARY biennial budget review and modification is undertaken pursuant to RCW 35A.34.130 and TMC 3.30.020. RI xII ?\CiI"I) I3Y cow Ivltg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 11/08/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: HOUGARDY RECOMMENDATIONS: SI 1 ()NS01R /ADN4IN. Finance Cc)n- rnn'I No decision; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXI'I?NI)ITURL; RI?QUIRFD AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0 Fund Source: Carnnzents: 5 IMTG.DATEI RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 11/28/11 MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS 11/28/11 I Informational memorandum dated 11/03/11 REVISED Ordinance in draft form with attachments Minutes from the Finance and Safety Committee meeting of 11/08/11 12/05/11 1 x City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Finance and Safety Committee FROM: Peggy McCarthy, Interim Finance Director DATE: November 22, 2011 SUBJECT: Mid Biennial Review and Modification of the 2011 -2012 Budget (Updated following Finance Safety Committee Meeting and 11 -21 -11 Workshop, changes shown in strikethrough underline.) ISSUE Adjust the biennial budget to reflect new policies and circumstances, to add appropriations to funds at risk of exceeding budget in order to remain in compliance with state law, and to reallocate budget authority among General Fund departments to prevent over budget situations, consistent with past City practice. BACKGROUND The mid biennial budget adjustments are a refinement of the budget and are undertaken pursuant to TMC 3.30.020 and RCW 35A.34.130. The ordinance amending the budget, if necessary, must be passed before the end of the calendar year. The purpose and type of adjustments proposed for the 2011 -2012 budget modification are as follows: Revenue Backed Expenditures These expenditures have offsetting revenue sources such as grant revenue. Reallocation of Budget Among Departments These adjustments reallocate expenditure budget from departments expected to be under budget to departments at risk of going over budget. Council Decisions Budget Additions These adjustments add budget in support of Council decisions and as a result of circumstances necessitating additional budget. Carryover of Unused Budget Unused budget is moved from 2011 to 2012. Accounting Modifications These adjustments move budget from funds and accounts no longer used to funds and accounts currently used pursuant to changes in accounting procedures for purposes of streamlining and simplification. New Initiatives The COPS Bicycle Team initiative is proposed for 2012 and beyond. A full description of this initiative will be presented by Police Chief Mike Villa under a separate memorandum. K, INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 DISCUSSION General Fund 000 The revenue backed expenditure adjustments comprise the JAG Recovery Act grant which funded a portion of the Police mobile command unit; the Emergency Management Program Grant which will fund various emergency management costs in 2012, anticipated WCIA insurance proceeds funding repair costs for a damaged signal pole and a JAG qrant obtained in partnership with the Tukwila School district to promote safetv at Showalter Middle School. The reallocation of budget among departments transfers budget from departments expected to be under budget for the year Public Works, Mayor's and Parks Recreation to departments at risk of going over budget City Attorney, Parks Maintenance and Department 20. City Attorney special matters account has a $100K budget but actual costs to date of $306K comprised of $94K for criminal prosecution, $69K for DESC vs. Tukwila DCD, $70K for the Wells Inverse condemnation, $19K for Reed Trucking and $19K for the Whitcutt arbitration. Additional budqet is proposed to cover a portion of this overage, such that the department will remain within budget. The Parks Maintenance salary budget excluded two staff members who were laid off at the end of 2010 but those jobs were reinstated in 2011, thus creating the over budget situation. The Department 20 claims and judgment account has a budget of $270K and to date expenditures of $405K comprised of the City's deductible portion of claims of $250K, the Fort Dent/Wells claim of $67K, and claims attributable to personnel issues of $87K. Additional budaet is proposed to cover a portion of this overage, such that the department will remain within budqet. The carryover of unused budget moves budget authority from 2011 to 2012 for projects and initiatives delayed or postponed until 2012. This includes the agenda manager technology system for the Clerk's office, crime analytical software for the Police Department and Department 20 transfers to General Government Fund 303 for removal of the flood mitigation devises and associated trail restoration. Council decisions or proposals before the Council resulting in added budget or creating new budget line items include reduction of the indirect cost allocation charqed to the Golf Course Fund, the operating loan advanced to the Metropolitan Park District for $375K in 2011 and not to exceed $725K in 2012 (this loan will be paid back beginning in 2013); $166K additional funding of the Reserve Fund 105 in 2011 and $1.2M in 2012. and a proposed $175K funding of a new permit system for the Community Development department. The latter initiative will be funded through assessment of a permit technology fee after implementation of the system. An additional $550K transfer -out to the Golf Course Fund is also proposed (see Golf Course Fund 411 below for further explanation). This 2011 transfer can be funded by a $250K budget savings within the transfers -out account (debt service was budgeted for the SCORE bonds but was paid for through SCORE start-up funds and not charged to the City) and by a $300K use of ending fund balance. 2291<4 t he exi6tinn b u dget far the General F Rd transfer of Q' 77r1� 4 W:12011 Info Memos- CouncilllnfoMemo_2011 -2012 Mid Biennium Budget Amendment REVISED 11 -22 -11 STRIKE THRU.doc INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 3 The new initiative would create a bicycle patrol team for the Tukwila International Boulevard neighborhood to increase police presence in the area. Police Chief Mike Villa will provide full details of the initiative under a separate memorandum. Hotel /Motel Tax Fund 101 The revenue backed Rock N Roll marathon expenditure for professional services is offset by revenue received from the marathon sponsors, the Competitor Group. Street Fund 103 Council decisions or proposals before the Council resultina in added budaet or creatinq new budaet line items include additional fundina for the 42 Avenue residential street proiect. The expenditure budget carryover of $103K to 2012 is for the design work on 42 Ave S from Southcenter Blvd to S 160 These costs will be funded through ending fund balance. Arterial Street Fund 104 The revenue backed expenditure adjustment is for an anticipated grant that will be used to purchase land right of way for redesign of Andover Park West in connection with the Tukwila Transit Center project. If the grant is obtained and the right of way purchased, an additional $78K would be needed from the ending fund balance to fund the transaction. The expenditure budget carryover to 2012 of $9.2 million is primarily for the Southcenter Parkway extension project. The revenue budget carryover represents proceeds from the LID bonds that will be issued in 2012 to reimburse the City for the Southcenter Access Project costs. Contingency (Reserve) Fund 105 Council decisions or proposals before the Council resultina in added budget or creatinq new budaet line items include additional funding of the Reserve Fund to comply with fundinq reauirements stipulated by the Reserve policy, adopted by Council in 2009. Debt Service Funds 2 Fund 207 serviced the debt on the 1999 General Obligation bond. This bond was refunded in 2008. The budget adjustment transfers the remaining fund balance of $13,300 to Fund 211, the fund servicing the refunded debt. The debt service budget for Fund 215 requires an additional $6K to fully service the 2011 debt. Therefore, additional budget is added. Council decisions or proposals before the Council resultinq in added budqet or creating new budaet line items include transferrina the 2003 outstandinq bond balance from the Golf Course Fund 411 to a aovernmental debt service fund and transferrina cash and investments from the Land Park Acquisition Fund 301 to the same governmental debt service fund. W:12011 Info Memos- Counci111nfoMemo_2011 -2012 Mid Biennium Budget Amendment REVISED 11 -22 -11 STRIKE THRU.doc 5 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 4 Land Acquisition Fund 301 Council decisions or proposals before the Council resultina in added budaet or creating new budget line items include transferring cash and investments from the Land Park Acauisition Fund 301 to a aovernmental debt service fund for Davment of debt service on the aolf course portion of the 2003 outstandina bond issue. The expenditure budget adjustment represents planned land acquisition in 2012 and is consistent with the CIP proposal. This purchase will be funded through ending fund balance. Facility Replacement Fund 302 Unused expenditure budget is moved carried over to 2012; funding will be accomplished through ending fund balance. General Government Fund 303 The expenditure budget carryover adjustment moves budget to 2012 for the removal of the flood mitigation devices the Hesco barriers and Super Sacks and the associated trail restoration. Council decisions or proposals before the Council resultina in added budaet or creatina new budaet line items include expenditure budget is added for the bond funded emergency management measures undertaken in 2011 that were not budgeted including $199K for the 6300 building generator, $104K for the Police incident command vehicle and $273K for the new phone system. Water Fund 401 Council decisions or proposals before the Council resulting in added budqet or creatinq new budaet line items include expenditure budget is —added to the 1995 revenue bond principal payment account as a result of Council approval of the early redemption of the 1995 revenue bond. The accounting modification change moves debt service accounting to the appropriate utility funds (Funds 401, 402 and 412) from the Water Sewer Revenue Bond Fund 404 to simplify and streamline the accounting process. Sewer Fund 402 Budqet Carryover Unused expenditure budget for the Interurban Avenue gravity sewer project and other projects is moved to 2012. Council decisions or proposals before the Council resultina in added budaet or creatina new budaet line items include Ali ieRal budget +s —added to the Fund to cover the cost of the Andover Park West emergency sewer repair project. The accounting modification change moves debt service accounting to the appropriate utility funds (Funds 401, 402 and 412) from the Water Sewer Revenue Bond Fund 404 to simplify and streamline the accounting process. Water/ Sewer Revenue Bonds Fund 404 6 W:12011 Info Memos- CouncilllnfoMemo_2011 -2012 Mid Biennium Budget Amendment REVISED 11 -22 -11 STRIKE THRU.doc INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 5 The accounting modification change moves debt service accounting to the appropriate utility funds (Funds 401, 402 and 412) from the Water Sewer Revenue Bond Fund 404 to simplify and streamline the accounting process. Golf Fund 411 Council decisions or proposals before the Council resulting in added budget or creatina new budget line items include expenditure budget is added to support the $114K golf cart purchase. Revenue budget is added for 2011 through a transfer in from the General Fund to alleviate the current cash deficit of $279K and cover the December debt service payment of $262K. As has been discussed before by Administration and Council, the budgeted transfer in from the General Fund of $225K is not sufficient to cover the General Fund indirect cost allocation charge of $221 K and the annual debt service costs of $333K. The cash deficit is a result of underfunding in 2010 as well as 2011. The a dditi„ .al t sfr, in proposed for 2012 is 355 K GOFFIff the exi6tinn b for the General Ci mr♦ trancfor_in of 'Y25K,. Surface Water Fund 412 Budget Carrvover Unused expenditure budget is moved to 2012; funding will be accomplished through ending fund balance. RECOMMENDATION The Finance and Safety Committee is being asked to approve the 2011 -2012 Mid- Biennium Budget Amendment and to move this item forward to the November 28 th Committee of the Whole meeting and the December 5 th Regular meeting for consideration and approval. ATTACHMENTS Draft Ordinance 2011 -2012 Mid Biennium Budget Amendment W:12011 Info Memos- Counci111nfoMemo_2011 -2012 Mid Biennium Budget Amendment REVISED 11 -22 -11 STRIKE THRU.doc 7 x AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2319, WHICH ADOPTED THE CITY OF TUKWILA'S BIENNIAL BUDGET FOR THE 2011 -2012 BIENNIUM, TO ADOPT AN AMENDED MID BIENNIUM BUDGET; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on November 22, 2010, Ordinance No. 2319 adopted the 2011 -2012 biennial budget of the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, a mid biennium budget amendment was presented to the City Council in a timely manner for their review, in accordance with RCW 35A.34.130; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on the proposed mid biennium budget amendment was advertised and held on November 28, 2011; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance Amended. Tukwila Ordinance No. 2319 is hereby amended with the City Council's adoption of the document entitled "City of Tukwila 2011 -2012 Mid Biennium Budget Amendment," incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, in accordance with RCW 35A.33.075. Section 2. Estimated Revenues and Appropriations. The totals of the estimated revenues and appropriations for each separate fund and the aggregate totals are as follows: FUND 000 General 101 Hotel /Motel Tax 103 Residential Street 104 Arterial Street 105 Contingency 209 Limited Tax G.O. Bonds, 2003 211 LTGO Refunding Bonds, 2008 215 Limited Tax G.O. Bonds, 2010B 404 Water /Sewer Revenue Bonds 411 Foster Golf Course EXPENDITURES $114,598,514 $3,796,633 $1,755,171 $56,202,266 $5,255,708 $4,489,882 $1,681,171 $386,900 $0 $4,855,278 W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Budget amendment 2011 -2012 mid biennium 11 -22 -11 JF /PM:bjs REVENUES $114,598,514 $3,796,633 $1,755,171 $56,202,266 $5,255,708 $4,489,882 $1,681,171 $386,900 $0 $4,855,278 Page 1 of 2 9 Section 3. Copies on File. A complete copy of the final budget for 2011 -2012, as adopted, together with a copy of this amending ordinance, shall be kept on file in the City Clerk's Office, and a copy shall be transmitted by the City Clerk to the Division of Municipal Corporations of the Office of the State Auditor and to the Association of Washington Cities. Section 4. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering and section /subsection numbering. Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force and effect five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2011. ATTEST /AUTH ENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk Jim Haggerton, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: Attachment: City of Tukwila 2011 -2012 Mid Biennium Budget Amendment W: Word Process ing \Ordinances \Budget amendment 2011 -2012 mid biennium 11 -22 -11 JF /PM:bjs Page 2 of 2 10 CITY OF TUKWILA 2011 -2012 MID BIENNIUM BUDGET AMENDMENT SUMMARY Mid Biennial Adjusted 2011 -2012 2011 -2012 Adjustment Adopted 100,064 114,598,514 Budget Fund 220,000 1,755,171 000 General $114,498,450 101 Hotel /Motel Tax 3,758,033 103 City Street 1,535,171 104 Arterial Street 49,186,266 105 Contingency 3,889,448 107 Fire Equipment Cumulative Reserve 1,673,041 109 Drug Seizure Fund 614,000 207 Limited Tax G.O. Bonds, 1999 208 Limited Tax G.O. Bonds, 2000 209 Limited Tax G.O. Bonds, 2003 1,186,922 210 Limited Tax G.O. Refunding Bonds, 2003 1,002,825 211 Limited Tax G.O. Refunding Bonds, 2008 1,667,871 212 Limited Tax G.O. Bonds, 2009A 60,350 213 Limited Tax G.O. Bonds, 2009B 509,043 214 Limited Tax G.O. Bonds, 2010A 789,750 215 Limited Tax G.O. Bonds, 2010B 380,900 216 Limited Tax G.O. Refunding Bonds Valley Com 403,900 301 Land Acquisition, Recreation Park Development 9,792,015 302 Facility Replacement 3,891,877 303 General Government Improvements 3,658,109 304 Fire Improvements 430,300 401 Water 17,413,433 402 Sewer 15,802,626 404 Water /Sewer Revenue Bonds 1,322,822 405 Bond Reserve 822,000 411 Foster Golf Course 4,305,278 412 Surface Water 9,867,549 501 Equipment Rental 11,418,895 502 Insurance Fund 17,563,949 503 Insurance LEOFF 1 Fund 3,754,886 611 Firemen's Pension 2,995,616 Total 284,195,325 Mid Biennial Adjusted Budget 2011 -2012 Adjustment Budget 100,064 114,598,514 38,600 3,796,633 220,000 1,755,171 7,016,000 56,202,266 1,366,260 5,255,708 1,673,041 614,000 3,302,960 13,300 6,000 (1,322,822) 550,000 11,290,362 4,489,882 1,002, 825 1,681,171 60,350 509,043 789,750 386,900 403,900 9,792,015 3,891,877 3,658,109 430,300 17,413,433 15,802,626 822,000 4,855,278 9,867,549 11,418,895 17, 563, 949 3,754,886 2,995,616 295,485,687 11 CITY OF TUKWILA 2011 -2012 MID BIENNIUM BUDGET AMENDMENT DETAIL Biennial Budget Increase (Decrease) 2011 2012 Revenues Expenditures GENERAL 00+ Revenue Backed Expenditures Revenue: JAG Recovery Act Mobile Command Unit 000.339.216.80.40 104,417 EMPG grant 000.333.970.42.00 82,210 Signal pole damage to be reimbursed by insurance (WCIA) 000.344.100.00.00 50,000 JAG grant with Tukwila School distrist 76,437 (a) Total Revenue 230,854 82,210 313,064 Expenditures JAG Recovery Act Mobile Command Unit 000.10.594.216.64.00 previously not budgeted 104,417 JAG grant with Tukwila School distrist 000.10.xxx.x0x.xx 76,437 (a) Emergency Management CERT Trainer other 000.11.525.600.xx.xx 82,210 Repair costs Signal pole 000.16.594.440.64.00 50,000 Total Expenditures 230,854 82,210 313,064 Reallocation of Budget Among Departments Expenditures: City Attorney Special Matters 000.06.515.200.41.03 160,000 Parks Maintenance: Salaries 000.15.576.800.11.00 60,000 Dept 20 Claims and judgements 000.20.514.230.49.03 100,000 Public Works Unallocated budget reduction (deptunderbudget) 000.13.532.100.00.05 (120,000) Mayors Unaliocated budget reduction deptunderbudget) 000.03.513.100.00.05 (90,000) Parks Recreation Unallocated budget reduction deptunderbudget) 000.07.574.200.00.05 (110,000) Total Expenditures Carryover of Unused Budget Expenditures: City Clerk Agenda Manager technology system 000.03.514.300.64.00 (21,000) 21,000 Police Crime Analytical Software 000.10.594.100.64.00 (15,000) 15,000 Dept 20 Transfers -out (Fund 303, Gen Govt) 000.20.597.000.00.00 (2,000,000) 2,000,000 Est Ending Unreserved Fund Balance 000.20.291.840.00.00 2,036,000 (2,036,000) Total Expenditures Council Decisions Budget Additions Revenue Indirect cost allocation transfer -in 000.397.000.00.00 (213,000) (a) (213,000) Total Revenue (213,000) Expenditures: Dept 20 Transfers -out (Fund 105, Reserve) 000.20.597.000.00.00 166,260 1,200,000 (a) Dept 20 Transfers -out (Fund 103, Residential Street) 000.20.597.000.00.00 220,000 (a) Dept 20 Transfers -out (Fund 411, Golf course Fund) 000.20.597.000.00.00 550,000 Dept 20 Transfers -out (Fund 212 and 213 SCORE debt service, not chgd by SCORE) 000.20.597.000.00.00 (250,000) Dept 20 Transfers -out (Fund 215, debt service) 000.20.597.000.00.00 6,000 Dept 20 Loan to Park District 000.20.599.000.xx.xx 375,000 725,000 DCD Proposed Permit System 000.08.xxx.xxx.xx.xx 175,000 Est Ending Unreserved Fund Balance 000.20.291.840.00.00 (847,260) (2,533,000) Total Expenditures (213,000) (213,000) 12 CITY OF TUKWILA 2011 -2012 MID BIENNIUM BUDGET AMENDMENT DETAIL Biennial Budget Increase (Decrease) 2011 2012 Revenues Expenditures New Initiatives COP Bicycle Team 11 MIMI Wall 214:533 11115 i- Expenditures 104.391.100.00.00 (9,230,000) 9,230,000 Revenue (9,230,000) 9,230,000 Police Department: 104.33x.xxx.xx.xx 6,600,000 (a) Grant Revenue Tukwila Urban Center 104.333.203.XX.XX 416,000 Unallocated budget reduction (dept underbudget) 000.10.xxx.xxx.xx.xx (220,000) Expenditures (9,230,000) 9,230,000 Salaries and benefits for 3 officers 000.10.xxx.xxx.xx.xx 494,000 345,000 104.01.291.840.00.00 6,522,000 (a) Care and custody of prisoners (SCORE savings) 000.10.523.600.51.00 7,016,000 7,016,000 (125,000) Est Ending Unreserved Fund Balance (2011 carry over from Police dept) 000.20.291.840.00.00 220,000 (220,000) Fund Total 100,064 100,064 tLIMOTEL TAX FUND 101, A Revenue Backed Expenditures Revenue Other Revenue Competitor Group 101.369.900.00.00 38,600 Total Revenue 38,600 38,600 Expenditures Professional services Rock N Roll Marathon 101.00.557.302.41.00 38,600 Total Expenditures 38,600 38,600 FUND TOTAL 38,600 38,600 Council Decisions Budget Additions Revenue Transfer in 103.397.000.00.00 220,000 (a) Total Revenue 220,000 220,000 Expenditures: Professional Services /construction 103.98.595.xx.xx.xx 220,000 (a) Total Expenditures 220,000 220,000 FUND TOTAL Carryover of Unused Budget Expenditures Professional Services 103.98.595.800.41.00 (130,000) 130,000 Est Ending Unreserved Fund Balance 103.01.291.840.00.00 130,000 (130,000) Total Expenditures FUND TOTAL 220,000 220,000 Carryover of Unused Budget 11 MIMI Wall 214:533 11115 i- Revenue Backed Expenditures 104.391.100.00.00 (9,230,000) 9,230,000 Revenue (9,230,000) 9,230,000 Grant Revenue various 104.33x.xxx.xx.xx 6,600,000 (a) Grant Revenue Tukwila Urban Center 104.333.203.XX.XX 416,000 Total Revenue 104.98.595.800.xx.xx (9,230,000) 7,016,000 7,016,000 Expenditures (9,230,000) 9,230,000 Land Right of way Transit Center 104.98.595.800.61.00 494,000 Est Ending Unreserved Fund Balance 104.01.291.840.00.00 6,522,000 (a) Total Expenditures 7,016,000 7,016,000 FUND TOTAL Carryover of Unused Budget Revenue: Debt proceeds 104.391.100.00.00 (9,230,000) 9,230,000 Total Revenue (9,230,000) 9,230,000 Expenditures Professional Services Construction Southcenter Parkway 104.98.595.800.xx.xx (9,230,000) 9,230,000 Total Expenditures (9,230,000) 9,230,000 Ending fund balance Fund total 7,016,000 7,016,000 13 CITY OF TUKWILA 2011 -2012 MID BIENNIUM BUDGET AMENDMENT DETAIL Biennial Budget Increase (Decrease) 2011 2012 Revenues Expenditures MwaAam Council Decisions Budget Additions Revenue: Transfer in General Fund 105.397.000.00.00 166,260 1,200,000 (a) Total Revenue 166,260 1,200,000 1,366,260 Expenditure Est Ending Unreserved Fund Balance 105.00.291.840.00.00 166,260 1,200,000 Total Expenditures 166,260 1,200,000 1,366,260 Fund total 1,366,260 1,366,260 Accounting Modifications: Expenditure: Transfer out 207.00.597.000.00.00 13,300 Est Ending Unreserved Fund Balance 207.00.291.840.00.00 (13,300) Total Expenditures Fund 207 total Revenue: Transfer in Fund 207 211.397.000.00.00 13,300 Total Revenue 13,300 13,300 Expenditure: Est Ending Unreserved Fund Balance 211.00.291.840.00.00 13,300 Total Expenditures 13,300 13,300 Fund 211 total Council Decisions Budget Additions Revenue: Transfer in General Fund 215.397.000.00.00 6,000 Total Revenue 6,000 6,000 Expenditure: Principal payment 215.00.592.950.83.00 6,000 Total Expenditures 6,000 6,000 Fund total Revenue: Transfer in Land Park Acquisitions 209.397.301.00.00 3,302,960 (a) Total Revenue 3,302,960 3,302,960 Expenditure: Debt service payment 209.00.xxx.xxx.xx.xx 333,751 (a) Est Ending Unreserved Fund Balance 3,302,960 (333,751) (a) Total Expenditures 3,302,960 3,302,960 Fund total 3,322,260 3,322,260 {{yy F E E Council Decisions Budget Additions Expenditure: Transfer out to debt service fund 301.00.597.209.00.00 3,302,960 (a) Land 301.98.594.760.61.00 1,000,000 Est Ending Unreserved Fund Balance 301.00.291.840.00.00 (3,302,960) (1,000,000) (a) Total Expenditures Fund total Carryover of Unused Budget Expenditure: Construction project 302.98.594.190.xx.xx (87,000) 87,000 Est Ending Unreserved Fund Balance 302.00.291.840.00.00 87,000 (87,000) Total Expenditures Fund total M CITY OF TUKWILA 2011 -2012 MID BIENNIUM BUDGET AMENDMENT DETAIL Council Decisions Budget Additions Construction Projects Est Ending Unreserved Fund Balance Total Expenditures Fund total 303.98.594.190.65.00 600,000 303.00.291.840.00.00 (600,000) (2,000,000) 2,000,000 Biennial Budget Increase (Decrease) N Council Decisions Budget Additions Expenditure: Expenditure: 1995 Revenue bond principal ($1,370,000 payoff Construction Projects less December payment) 401.01.597.720.00.00 1,080,000 120,000 1995 Revenue bond principal 401.01.597.720.00.00 (310,000) 1995 Revenue bond interest 401.01.597.820.00.00 (80,494) Est Ending Working Capital 401.02.293.800.00.00 (1,080,000) 390,494 Accounting Modification 416,000 2006 Revenue bond principal 401.01.597.720.01.00 (33,800) 2006 Revenue bond interest 401.01.597.820.01.00 (29,627) 2006 Revenue bond principal 401.02.582.347.72.00 33,800 2006 Revenue bond interest 401.02.592.347.83.00 29,627 Total Expenditures 402.01.597.820.01.00 Fund total 2006 Revenue bond principal 402.02.582.357.72.00 SR,Ft9ND 402. 777 `5 u Carryover of Unused Budget Expenditure: Construction Projects 402.98.594.353.65.00 (120,000) 120,000 Est Ending Working Capital 402.02.293.800.00.00 120,000 (120,000) Council Decisions Budget Additions Professional Services 402.98.594.353.xx.xx 416,000 Est Ending Working Capital 402.02.293.800.00.00 (416,000) Accounting Modification 2006 Revenue bond principal 402.01.597.720.01.00 (80,600) 2006 Revenue bond interest 402.01.597.820.01.00 (70,649) 2006 Revenue bond principal 402.02.582.357.72.00 80,600 2006 Revenue bond interest 402.02.592.357.83.00 70,649 Total Expenditures Fund total Accounting Modification Revenue: Investment interest 404.361.110.00.00 (60) (60) 1995 Revenue bond principal Water /Sewer 404.397.720.00.00 (283,250) (291,748) 2006 Revenue bond principal Water /Sewer 404.397.720.01.00 (123,600) (127,308) 1995 Revenue bond interest Water /Sewer 404.397.820.00.00 (117,264) (120,782) 2006 Revenue bond interest Water /Sewer 404.397.820.01.00 (127,463) (131,287) Total Revenue (651,637) (671,185) (1,322,822) Expenditure: Est Ending Working Capital 404.00.293.800.00.00 (53,435) (77,341) 1995 Revenue bond principal Water /Sewer 404.00.582.380.72.00 (290,000) (310,000) 2006 Revenue bond principal Water /Sewer 404.00.582.380.72.01 (105,600) (105,600) 1995 Revenue bond interest Water /Sewer 404.00.592.380.83.00 (92,068) (71,937) 2006 Revenue bond interest Water /Sewer 404.00.592.380.83.01 (104,310) (99,896) General Government transfer to General Fund 404.00.597.190.00.00 (6,224) (6,411) Total Expenditures (651,637) (671,185) (1,322,822) Fund total (1,322,822) (1,322,822) 15 CITY OF TUKWILA 2011 -2012 MID BIENNIUM BUDGET AMENDMENT DETAIL Biennial Budget Increase (Decrease) INCREASE IN BIENNIAL BUDGET $11,290,362 $11,290,362 (a) Represents an adjustment added since review of the budget amendments by the Finance Safety Committee on November 8th. W 2011 2012 Revenues Expenditures Council Decisions Budget Additions Revenue: Transfer in General Fund 411.397.190.00.00 550,000 (a) Total Revenue 550,000 550,000 Expenditure: Indirect cost allocation 411.00.597.000.00.00 (213,000) (a) Small Tools Minor Equipment 411.00.576.680.35.00 114,210 Est Ending Working Capital 411.00.293.800.00.00 435,790 213,000 Total Expenditures 550,000 550,000 Fund total 550,000 550,000 a Carryover of Unused Budget Expenditures: Professional Services 412.98.594.382.41.00 (225,000) 225,000 Land 412.98.594.382.61.00 (40,000) 40,000 Construction Projects 412.98.594.382.65.00 (333,000) 333,000 Est Ending Working Capital 412.02.293.800.00.00 598,000 (598,000) Fund total INCREASE IN BIENNIAL BUDGET $11,290,362 $11,290,362 (a) Represents an adjustment added since review of the budget amendments by the Finance Safety Committee on November 8th. W Finance Satety Committee Minutes November 8, 2011— Pace 2 D. Ordinance: 2011 -2012 Budget Amendment As required by the Revised Code of Washington, staff is seeking Council approval of an ordinance amending the 2011- 12 Biennial Budget. The amendment includes many items that have been discussed and addressed throughout the year. After some discussion, the City Administrator clarified that the Council has the legal authority to approve city funds and appropriations. The responsibility to transfer dollars within a fund is an Executive function. Committee Member Robertson asked for specific details regarding the origin of the "surplus" funds from the Public Works Department, Mayor's Office, and Parks Recreation. Chair Hougardy noted that we seem to be consistently over budget in the City Attorney's office. Committee Member Hernandez wondered if the City should at some point consider hiring an in -house attorney. Committee Member Robertson suggested that staff review the history of budgeted versus actual costs, to improve estimates for I>k expenditures in the future. Discussion continued regarding the subsidies for Foster Golf Course. Committee Member Robertson requested that staff provide a summary of what the General Fund will need to subsidize for the golf course during the next six years, since it has been difficult to get a clear understanding of the costs related to the golf course. He also suggested a detailed walk- through of this summary with Councilmembers at the November 14 COW meeting. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. E. Memorandum of Understanding with Washington Cities Insurance Authoritv Staff is seeking Council approval of a memorandum of understanding with Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA) which will reduce the City's liability insurance deductible from $100,000 to $25,000. Interim Finance Director Peggy McCarthy explained that this change in deductible could reduce the City's overall costs related to insurance. The Committee requested that staff consider reformatting and simplifying the data and analysis for presentation to the Council. It was also suggested that staff look specifically at the number and types of claims when this analysis is done next year. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 14 COW FOR DISCUSSION. F. Proaosal: Additional Police StaffinLy Chief Villa explained that the City had a bicycle patrol on Highway 99 in the mid 1990s. The patrol was an effective tool in crime mitigation, but was discontinued several years later due to competing interests and demands in the Department. The recent closure of the Neighborhood Resource Center has resulted in increased reports by citizens regarding panhandling and prostitution. The Police Department continues to do whatever it can to create a safe neighborhood environment in the TIB area, and is looking into re- instating a bicycle patrol. However, the patrol cannot be staffed with the current number of officers. Funding for the three additional positions needed, will come from savings from the 2011 budget and with adjustments to the 2012 budget. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 14 COW FOR DISCUSSION. III. MISCELLANEOUS Meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m. Next meeting: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 5:00 p.m. Conference Room #3 9� q Committee Chair Approval Min t s by JT and KH. Reviewed by PM and KAM. 17 im COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS CAS NUMBLY AGF,NDA I'rr I TI'1'I,I Initials ITEM NO. Meeting Date Prepared by I Mayor's review I 11/28/11 PM C_.. I Council review (Q,t'1 1 3 (2) 12/05/11 PM 4.A (2) ITEM INFORMATION STAFF SPONSOR: PEGGY MCCARTHY ORIGINAI_AGI -JNDA DA'1'1 11/28/11 Resolution adopting the 2012 -2017 Financial Planning Model and Capital Improvement Program C rFG )RY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance .Bid Award Public Hearing Other Alts Date 11/28/11 A7tg Date A7tg Date 12105111 A4tg Date Altt Date tl?.tg Date 11/28/11 Mtg Date 11/21/11 SM )NSOR Council Mayor HR DCD Finance ❑Fire IT P&'R Police PIT% SPONSOR'S This resolution will adopt the 2012 -2017 Financial Planning Model and Capital SUNNIMARY Improvement Program with a Public Hearing on 11/28/11. Council reviewed the Proposed 2012 -2017 CIP at the Budget Workshops held on 10/25/11 and 11/21/11. HY cow Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. DATE: N/A SPECIAL SESSION 11/21 COMMITTEE CHAIR: RECOMMENDATIONS: S1 /ADi\41N. Finance and Public Works COMMIT °I'F;I COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EZPrNDI"1'U1ZI-: RI?()UIRIsIll AMOUNT BUDGETED $0.00 $0.00 Fund Source: Comments: MTG. DATE 11/21/11 11/28/11 12/5/11 MTG. DATE 11/28/11 12/05/11 Transportation Cmte Planning Comm. APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0.00 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION Council briefing and discussion ATTACHMENTS Informational Memorandum dated 11/22/11 Attachments A, B, and C Attachment G Draft Resolution 19 20 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: FROM IN O Mayor Haggerton Tukwila City Council Bob Giberson, Public Works Director Peggy McCarthy, Interim Finance Director November 22, 2011 SUBJECT: 2012 2017 Financial Planning Model and Caoital Improvement Proaram Resolution ISSUE Approve Resolution adopting the 2012 2017 Financial Planning Model and Capital Improvement Program (CIP). BACKGROUND The Council reviewed the Attachments and the CIP projects at the CIP Workshops held on October 25 and November 21, 2011. Changes were made to Attachment A subsequent to the November 21 st workshop to reflect the following: Reference Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment B Attachment G Attachment G Attachment G Line Description Intergovernmental revenue Intergovernmental revenue Transfer to reserve fund Unfunded PERS balance Total Fund Balances Reserves Transfers to Golf Course Sales Tax Operations maintenance Indirect cost allocation Action Taken Added $370K to 2012 for BLS Emergency grant previously not included Eliminated COPs grant revenue in 2013 and thereafter Added to reserve funding for 2012 -2017 to achieve ending reserve balance equal to 16% of 2017 general fund revenues plus 1% of GF revenues for each of the years 2011 2017. Added line item to show cumulative effect of annual set -aside Added line to provide total balances available at the end of each year. Eliminated the previously proposed budget amendment for 2012; remaining transfer is part of adopted 2012 budget Eliminated the previously proposed budget amendment for 2012; remaining transfer is part of adopted 2012 budget Reduced amount to achieve ending cash accumulated total for 2011 Estimate of $0. Footnoted to communicate intention of revising amounts in 2013 and thereafter after review and update of allocation. WT IN Projects \Council Agenda Items \Workshop 11- 21- 11 \11 -22 -11 \Resolution Info Memo 2012 -2017 docx 21 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 DISCUSSION The model indicates an ending fund balance of the governmental funds, (excluding the Hotel /Motel Tax Fund) of a $1,206K deficit at the end of the six -year period. However if the set -aside for the unfunded PERS is added, the balance increases to $4,081 K. The balance in the reserve fund at the end of this period is $13,093K. RECOMMENDATION The Council is being asked to approve the Resolution for the 2012 2017 Financial Planning Model and Capital Improvement Program for consideration at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole meeting (with a Public Hearing) and subsequent December 7, 2009 Regular Meeting. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Attachment A Attachment B Attachment G WARN ProjectslCouncil Agenda Items\Workshop 11 -21- 11111- 22- 111Resolution Info Memo 2012- 2017.docx 22 ATTACHMENT A CITY OF TUKWILA TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES 2012 2017 Analysis in 000's REVENUES (see A-1) 2009 Actual 2010 Actual 2011 Budget 2011 Estimate 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 1 Totals General Revenues Sales Tax 14,739 16,060 15,400 16,200 16,248 16,492 16,739 17,241 17,759 18,291 102,770 Property Taxes 12,190 13,189 13,530 13,800 13,868 14,215 14,570 14,934 15,308 15,690 88,585 Utility Taxes 4,942 4,064 4,723 4,800 4,840 4,985 5,135 5,289 5,447 5,611 31,307 RGRL 1,900 1,465 1,475 1,512 1,550 1,588 1,628 1,669 9,422 One -time sale of property 700 10 0 1,000 0 0 0 0 1,000 Interfund Utility Taxes 1,813 1,498 1,426 1,500 1,524 1,545 1,628 1,741 1,820 1,907 10,165 Gambling Taxes 2,568 2,110 2,586 2,400 2,502 2,577 2,654 2,734 2,816 2,901 16,184 Contract Agreement SCL 1,967 2,071 2,000 2,000 2,050 2,112 2,175 2,240 2,307 2,377 13,260 Charges /Fees for Services 2,727 3,985 4,338 4,345 4,169 4,294 4,423 4,556 4,692 4,833 26,967 Transfers In Other Funds 1,857 1,696 1,475 1,837 1,656 1,706 1,757 1,810 1,864 1,920 10,712 Intergovernmental Revenue 3,572 1,189 872 949 1,182 873 900 927 954 983 5,819 Other Taxes /Miscellaneous 2,793 2,386 2,432 2,400 1,609 1,657 1,707 1,758 1,811 1,865 10,408 Subtotal 49,168 48,248 51,382 51,706 51,123 52,968 53,237 54,818 56,407 58,046 326,599 Dedicated Revenues (Capital) Real Estate Taxes 257 379 201 250 200 206 212 219 225 232 1,294 Motor Vehicle Taxes 393 394 339 360 345 355 366 377 388 400 2,232 Investment Interest/Misc. 136 62 18 100 129 133 137 141 145 150 834 Property Taxes 12 0 64 99 65 67 68 70 72 74 415 Parking Taxes 156 144 108 133 111 114 118 121 125 129 718 Subtotal 954 979 730 942 850 875 901 928 955 984 5,493 TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE 50,122 49,227 52,112 52,648 51,973 53,843 54,138 55,746 57,362 59,030 332,092 EXPENDITURES Operations Maintenance: 44,641 43,640 45,335 44,100 45,210 47,010 49,125 51,336 53,646 56,060 302,386 (See Attachment B) Debt Service 2,094 2,331 2,925 2,750 3,279 6,037 3,130 2,643 2,414 2,406 19,909 Transfer to Reserve Fund 0 0 400 1,500 3,000 3,400 3,500 548 564 580 11,593 Estimated Unfunded PIERS 0 0 0 0 803 835 868 903 939 939 5,287 Admin /Engineering Overhead 497 552 384 515 309 318 328 338 338 348 1,978 Subtotal Available 2,890 2,704 3,068 3,783 (628) (3,757) (2,812) (22) (538) (1,303) (9,061) Capital Attachment C Residential Streets 0 32 (80) 20 650 0 200 500 2,800 0 4,150 Arterial Streets /Bridges 5,560 1,202 2,705 2,000 (3,769) 2,550 1,935 2,865 1,945 2,035 7,561 Parks Trails 0 315 590 (43) 1,119 338 142 142 (58) (54) 1,629 General Government Facilities 193 16 101 10 100 (4,355) 0 0 0 0 (4,255) General Imp /HHD Response 2,612 1,740 2,144 326 2,715 500 500 500 500 500 5,215 Fire Improvements 0 0 0 (50) (50) 0 0 0 (50) (55) (155) Subtotal Capital 8,365 3,305 5,460 2,263 765 (967) 2,777 4,007 5,137 2,426 14,145 Balance by Year (5,475) (601) (2,392) 1,520 (1,393) (2,790) (5,589) (4,029) (5,675) (3,729) (23,206) Carryover from 2011 26,556 21,082 18,640 20,480 22,000 0 0 0 0 0 22,000 Accumulated Totals (a) 21,081 20,481 16,248 22,000 20,607 17,817 12,228 8,199 2,523 (1,206) Reserve fund balance (b) 1,500 4,500 7,900 11,400 11,948 12,612 13,093 Unfunded PIERS balance 803 1,638 2,506 3,409 4,348 5,287 TOTAL FUND BALANCE RESERVES 25,910 27,355 26,134 23,556 19,384 17,174 (a) Represents ending fund balance of all governmental funds except the Hotel /Motel Tax Fundl01 and the Contingency Fund 105. (b) Represents the ending fund balance of the Contingency Fund 105. 2012 2017 Financial Planning Model V i l 11/2212011 23 24 ATTACHMENT B City of Tukwila General Fund Operations Maintenance Expenditures 2012 2017 Analysis in 000's Notes: A 4.5% increase is anticipated for the years 2013 -2016 due to the expected increases in healthcare, retirement rates, and general inflationary pressures. Most of the increases will be related to salaries and benefits. Moderate cost -of- living allowances (COLAS) are projected along with the normal annual step increases. The Rainy Day contingency and the estimated ending fund balances are not shown here as budgeted amounts because they are considered reserves to be used in emergencies. 2012 2017 Financial Planning Model XI 1 1/22/2011 25 2010 EXPENDITURES Actuals 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Totals City Council 243 270 282 295 308 322 336 1,814 Mayor, Boards 2,229 2,523 2,637 2,755 2,879 3,009 3,144 16,947 Human Resources 464 573 599 626 654 683 714 3,849 Finance 2,183 1,603 1,675 1,751 1,829 1,912 1,998 10,767 City Attorney 579 543 567 593 620 648 677 3,647 Parks Recreation 4,123 3,509 3,667 3,832 4,005 4,185 4,373 23,571 Community Development 2,635 2,684 2,805 2,931 3,063 3,201 3,345 18,028 Municipal Court 1,209 994 1,039 1,085 1,134 1,185 1,239 6,677 Police 13,166 14,063 14,696 15,357 16,048 16,770 17,525 94,460 Fire 9,914 10,226 10,686 11,167 11,670 12,195 12,743 68,687 Information Technology 953 1,154 1,206 1,260 1,317 1,376 1,438 7,751 Public Works /Streets 5,689 6,290 6,573 6,869 7,178 7,501 7,838 42,249 Dept. 20 Miscellaneous 253 553 578 604 631 659 689 3,714 Transfers to Golf Course 225 225 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 43,640 45,210 47,010 49,125 51,336 53,646 56,060 302,386 Notes: A 4.5% increase is anticipated for the years 2013 -2016 due to the expected increases in healthcare, retirement rates, and general inflationary pressures. Most of the increases will be related to salaries and benefits. Moderate cost -of- living allowances (COLAS) are projected along with the normal annual step increases. The Rainy Day contingency and the estimated ending fund balances are not shown here as budgeted amounts because they are considered reserves to be used in emergencies. 2012 2017 Financial Planning Model XI 1 1/22/2011 25 26 r m p To o ,q� 0 0 I I U b 1 OI qO W O I CO N 1 U 1 q 1 1r 10 I q o O N o 0 U I d N co o 0 z N C I M 1 l Z a I cr) J N N 1 0 of c N co O. N Q I 14 s o a` o) c 0 S C I 28 XIII k (n O h O^ h N N O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O h et O )O O O O O O N h h N M O M O O O O N O) O O h V M N 0 O O O Cp O co h h (p N lc O O O n <o SO M )O V' h O O fp N �o O N "t R N O et h 0 S\ "t 00 M 0 1� )O h h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O M O N L M M f\ O N( O 'O N O d O N O M qi �O O O f0 Oi c0 F O O N O c o 0 0 0 M^ O O O N O co O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V O 0 cN0 (M O to O N O to eV- L N 0 r O Cl) o r N N L O N O �O O O U N F° O O L �to o N CD Lo N O E N -I -I— —I -I— L z sn cO0 No M O N O N i n- N N 00 0 Lo Lo Y 4) V c d o 0 o 0 o 0 OD o W V O O O .O C M L C G N N Lo O M A L i 0 U N F O U i+ W I Lo n M O O n N^ 0 CL L M N O M O I N Cd U o N I W O M V L N� N N N O UI N M N O L a`s Co N W) N o Cl) L O <O N M O M 4) C N N O N O O �V .M- N t O M c�h 0 m O r Z W O) O N M N m 1� CO W O N M� N N N N 00 N O N M V' U m h co O N M r N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M co m M co V V IL N r (n O m O O N C T' V E w m E Y O U N Y N 0 Q .Y Y N V 07 N F_ U c N a �i m C O p C l0 f0 Y a U O; O N d C N m C N N d r N V C (O N N U y p c (n 7 O N J it N U a d m C n C O w N C� c N N Y E O co C C Q O V_ L �n N i C Q E C C O. Y O (n A V a U C 7 G) C C Q1 m LL a O In E co L W C C) w Lo C T Q c N N .N c Y V (n N w m m c T O N M a m c� U T O— a m m U U 3 L m cn 0 a: y a m M N a p Z o 0 y 0 w N ya a`s NY a�,�� Si_- CL a)� T N 0a comma m L) N d c 7 O> a r a m E c w m m CO m c m CO Cl- a D 65 7 N o d a m C LL U l0 N a C N N L v N 'rn uy O U ,L.. C m !n !n .L-. m m H v a a`) c 0 c a) v N m"t M (0 C 7 aD N O M m Q d V 7 c 0 D Cl) 7 7 O O f6 Y .L. Y o 7 C c Z) c d C C O 7 N O N r m ¢mt- m v>F- aaF- aF- ¢¢�cnrn�wi53: ��cn�cn�azcncnv�cn I 14 s o a` o) c 0 S C I 28 XIII XIV 29 x (A f� O N O O n O h O ^I O O 4'1 h N 0 O 0 041 O O O aD; O I Of h O N h h h N N N M O O O f� N i U� N N ap aD o N Lo o o o^ O 0 O O (:)I O O O' O O O Oi N 0 0 0 N L N C c) O O h O N V O N 0 LO N LO co N C. Cl 0 0 0 o 0 O O. O O I N I O O O O 7 O N N r N O N O) N I r cn I I I N I U I I I I o I N o1 m I- E N i L N o O t LO D N j N L IL C C N O O N m w cc Z I I O cc j H d 4.0 N O O 00 n 4— V 0 o O O o �+aa s 04 CN O U i I ti V •d I I i CL m N O O co cn cn 0 L d M LO O CO 0 v M 00 W O I I N O co O N N N I I m O O a z v O v i n W v l v O) v O LO n N LO M LO i u7 U� t0 LO r LO W O LO �n O co co N co M co N c� co u) co n 00 co co C F o c a 'o m` a c of (Ai al C2 c c I o E N o c CN y 21 3• o a N y o' N l a N (nl a U N w C O_ N E U Y O N V L N Lll f0I m 1] Y A n a a al a- m o a� x U a m m a m J a 4? a o N p m y o a a m in U a O o I m o y> o m �o r U" m m to et) m m atS m m Q= a m'' o rn m o x o. cn m rn m e .E o UI E (0 c 0 m Q a w m 3 O d I Y c v 2 o c x¢ m r o y a s m U H H o �i C7 ig m m a, o U �n T@ a o m cA 2 of Oai nI O C7 z 0 XIV 29 N N �O a` O m O 30 XV x m E 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O x m E2 O O O O O O x In y Lo! C) N O O R 0 co 0 N N M (D N O O O N N c0 Oi Oi N N c0 O O O m r O v v V) Q Q Q o N N O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O r O N O M N N L O O N L O V 7 O L fA O O N N D r O CND U) m m L m Of O I ii O I O O O O O h 0 0 0 O LO LO c`i LO L O O o O CO O r O r O r O N N I O N I O O N I h O CO y L LO O m O I v U U U CN L O O M (0 0 o O M O Cp O O O N I N 2 h to td N -1. 1 (V LO I LO C rn L L O O O r U) N LO tl: N I O N I O N I O w�� Li VI Z 2: O O O O 1 ip f0 N 3c 0 d I L °o 0 N N L N '0 N C'i O O r �d C7 O I O O O O N O •O p O M p C N N 1 /O ZI O N �I O U') LO N Z7 O h N I i O f+ y O' o• LO LO o 00 o co 11 Q /L L M� er l V i O 00 w� C M O M O p O O Q O VL U W o N o o N h M_ O I I C O7 ;a L' O O N Z p CID O V O O O U) O LO 0 R m N U 00 N O r U G_ L N O A• N N W /A N O O N I O O O N I O O a LO im O O) O N CO m O O (O r Ou 0) O 01 O N M U m Z (D r r r r m Z r r r r m Z r OD 00 m co Q) a N U a? 2 N y� U) C LL '0 U U N 0 U N 7 J U C .N. E N N N 7 o U J O N 7 U J a N J 7 J N LL O ICI d H r O U N I- E N N U L O co O` O Q' d d O m N N .m.. m N C O L O m N LL D~ O m O. O C c 7 m 0 °a nl N a� N a Y o> m r o N Y— U) U Y L C N T d O` LL m C 1] m 7 'L w E y O LL a� LL w 3 3° z z w N O U 0 w a N N �O a` O m O 30 XV REVENUES Green Fees I I Sales Tax Izl Merchandise Sales Power Cart Rentals Concession Proceeds Other Revenue (3) Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Operations Maintenance (4) Indirect Cost Allocation X51 Debt Service iel Subtotal Golf Capital CIP Program Total Expenditures Cash Flow Year by Year Carryover from 2011 Accumulated Totals 2009 Actual 1,034 328 158 186 19 31 1,756 ATTACHMENT G City of Tukwila GOLF ENTERPRISE FUND 2012 2017 Analysis in 000's 2010 2011 2011 Actual Budget Estimate 2012 2013 1,018 1,200 920 970 970 330 225 775 225 132 148 130 130 130 172 195 173 175 175 80 120 90 95 98 24 24 24 24 24 1,756 1,912 2,112 1 1,619 1,397 1,672 1,600 1,701 1,512 13 13 222 222 378 335 339 339 2,063 1,948 2,262 2,073 0 0 75 67 2,063 1,948 2,337 2,140 (307) (192) (425) (28) 610 220 425 28 303 28 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total 1,019 1,019 1,068 1,068 6,114 225 136 136 142 142 816 183 183 191 191 1,098 101 104 107 110 614 25 25 26 26 150 1,464 1,467 1,534 1,537 9,017 1,458 1,448 1,486 1,521 1,562 1,601 9,076 15 15 (a) 16 16 17 17 97 1,473 1,463 1,502 1,537 1,579 1,618 9,173 66 80 80 80 82 82 470 1,539 1,543 1,582 1,617 1,661 1,700 9,643 80 (147) (118) (151) (127) (163) (626) 80 (67) (185) (335) (462) (626) (a) Indirect cost allocation will be adjusted after an update and review of the cost allocation methodology. 2012 -2017 Financial Planning Model XX I I 11/22/2011 31 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2012 -2017 FINANCIAL PLANNING MODEL AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR GENERAL GOVERNMENT AND THE CITY'S ENTERPRISE FUNDS. WHEREAS, when used in conjunction with the biennial City budget, the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and the Financial Planning Model for the period 2012- 2017 are resource documents to help plan directions the City will consider for the future; and WHEREAS, the Financial Planning Model and Capital Improvement Program are not permanent fixed plans, but are guidelines or tools to help reflect future goals and future resources at the time budgets are being planned; and WHEREAS, the commitment of funds and resources can only be made through the budget process; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby adopts the 2012 -2017 Financial Planning Model and accompanying Capital Improvement Program, incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein. Section 2. A copy of the 2012 -2017 Financial Planning Model and accompanying Capital Improvement Program shall be kept on file in the City Clerk's Office. Section 3. The assumptions, revenues and expenditures will be reviewed and updated annually, or as necessary, by the City Council. Section 4. The detail of Capital Improvement Program projects will be reflected in the published Financial Planning Model and Capital Improvement Program 2012 -2017. W: \Word Processing- City \Resolutions \Financial Planning Model CIP 2012 -2017 cL:bjs Page 1 of 2 33 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2011. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney Allan Ekberg, Council President Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Resolution Number: Attachment: Financial Planning Model and Capital Improvement Program 2012 -2017 W: \Word Process ing- City \Resolutions \Financial Planning Model CIP 2012 -2017 GL:bjs Page 2 of 2 34 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS rnitials ITEM NO. Meetiizq Date Prepared by I Mayor's review C i{racil review 11/28/11 RT 4.B. 12/05/11 RT ITEM INFORMATION CAS STAFF SPONsoR: RICHARD TAKECHI OI2]GINALAGFNDA DATr 11/28/11 A( ;I ?ND,\ ITI Trrl:r. Establishment of a second $100.00 Change Fund Level for the Finance Dept and Repeal of Resolution No. 1721. Cxi'r(,oltY Discu.0 on Motion Resolution Ordinance .Bid Award .Public.Hearing Other Alt; Date 11/22/11 Altg Date Mtg Date 12/5/11 Mtg Date Altg Date Mtg Date Alt Date SPONSOR Council Mayor HR DCD Finance Fire IT P &R Police PIS/ SPONSOR'S To provide greater operational efficiency and enhanced customer service, a second Finance SU`1n -rARY Dept cash register was installed. It is now necessary to establish a second $100.00 change fund for the Finance Dept. Council is being asked to adopt a resolution establishing this second change fund. RI ,VIFANtI?ID BY cow Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 11/22/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: HOUGARDY RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /AI)M]N. Finance COM\4FI IT "F Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EZPENDrI'1jR1 Ri ;1ouiRI-1ID AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $N /A $N /A $N /A Fund Source: C'otnnnenis: MTG.DATEI RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 11/28/11 MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS 11/28/11 I Informational Memorandum dated 11/22/11 Resolution in draft form Resolution 1721 Minutes from the Finance and Safety Committee meeting of 11/22/11 12/05/11 35 36 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Finance Safety Committee FROM: Peggy McCarthy, Interim Finance Director DATE: November 2, 2011 SUBJECT: Establishment of a second $100.00 Change Fund Level for the Finance Department ISSUE To establish a second, new $100.00 change fund level for the Finance Department and repeal Resolution No. 1721. BACKGROUND A second Finance Department cash register was installed in October to provide for operational efficiency and improved customer service. It is the desire of staff to establish a second change fund level in the amount of $100.00 for this second cash register. DISCUSSION The attached proposed resolution will establish a second change fund level for the Finance Department as follows: Finance Department: General Fund (000) 100.00 Water Fund (401) 100.00 Total Finance Department 200.00 Once the City Council approves the establishment of the second change fund level for the Finance Department through the repeal of Resolution No. 1721, a claims disbursement check will be issued through Accounts Payable to release the funds. RECOMMENDATION The Council is being asked to consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular Meeting. ATTACHMENTS -Draft Resolution Resolution No. 1721. 37 m Y• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING A SECOND FINANCE DEPARTMENT CHANGE FUND LEVEL, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 1721. WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council previously established Change Funds and Petty Cash Fund levels, most recently by Resolution No. 1721, passed July 19, 2010; and WHEREAS, the Change Fund levels established by Resolution No. 1721 included only one Change Fund level for the Finance Department, from the Water Fund -401; and WHEREAS, there is a need to establish a second Change Fund level from the General Fund -000 in the amount of $100.00 for the Finance Department for operational efficiency and improved customer service; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Change Fund levels are hereby set as follows: Finance Department Finance Department City Clerk's Office Seattle Southside Visitor Center Municipal Court Parks and Recreation Golf Course General Fund water Fund General Fund Hotel /Motel Tax Fund General Fund General Fund Foster Golf Course Fund W: \Word Processing \Resolutions \Finance Dept- Second Change Fund Level 11 -3 -11 RT:bjs 000 I 100.00 401 I 100.00 000 100.00 101 100.00 000 300.00 000 300.00 411 1,200.00 (or less as needed) Page 1 of 2 39 Section 2. The Petty Cash Fund levels are hereby set as follows: Finance Department lGeneral Fund 000 800.00 Police Investigation /Tukwila lGeneral Fund 000 10,000.00 Fire Department lGeneral Fund 000 1 350.00 Parks and Recreation lGeneral Fund 000 1 500.00 Public Works Division II lGeneral Fund 000 1 350.00 Public Works Division I lGeneral Fund 000 1 200.00 Section 3. Resolution No. 1721 is hereby repealed. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 1 2011. ATTEST /AUTH ENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk Allan Ekberg, Council President APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Resolution Number: Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney W: \Word Processing \Resolutions \Finance Dept- Second Change Fund Level 11 -3 -11 RT:bjs Page 2 of 2 is ..'�N`g Im y ;IF 1908 City of Tukwila Washington Resolution No. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING A SEATTLE SOUTHSIDE VISITOR CENTER CHANGE FUND LEVEL; AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 1676. WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council previously established Change Funds and Petty Cash Fund levels, most recently by Resolution No. 1676, passed February 2, 2009; and WHEREAS, for the implementation of new retail operations, cashiering functions and improved customer service, there is a need to establish a new change fund level in the amount of $100.00 for the Seattle Southside Visitor Center; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Change Fund levels are hereby set as follows: Finance Department City Clerk's Office Seattle Southside Visitor Center Municipal Court I Parks and Recreation Golf Course 1 Water Fund 1 General Fund 1 Hotel /Motel Tax Fund 1 General Fund 1 General Fund Foster Golf Course Fund 0001 100.001 0001 100.001 lol 100.001 000 I 300.001 0001 300.001 4111 1,200.00 Parks and Recreation (or less, as needed) Section 2. The Petty Cash Fund levels are hereby set as follows: Finance Department 1 General Fund 000 800.001 Police Investigation /Tukwila I General Fund 000 I 10,000.001 Fire Department 1 General Fund 000 1 350-001 Parks and Recreation General Fund 000 I 500.001 Public Works Division II General Fund 000 I 350.001 Public Works Division I 1 General Fund 000 1 200.001 Section 3. Resolution No. 1676 is hereby repealed. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this 0 74 day of 2010. J ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED Robertson, Council President Christy OT14herty, CMC, Cititlerk APPROVED T RM BY: O of the ey W Word Processing \Resolutions \Southside Change Fund.docx PM:mrh 7/13/2010 Filed with the City Clerk- L4 n Passed by the City Council: Resolution Number: Page 1 of 1 41 42 City of Tukwila Finance and Safety Committee FINANCE AND SAFETY COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes November 22, 2011— 5:00 p.m.; Conference Room #3 PRESENT Councilmembers: Kathy Hougardy, Chair; Joan Hernandez and Dennis Robertson Staff: Mike Villa, Don Lincoln, David Cline, Stephanie Brown, Peggy McCarthy, Melissa Hart and Kimberly Matej Guests: Chuck Parrish and Ellen Gengler CALL TO ORDER: Chair Hougardy called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m. I. PRESENTATIONS No presentations. II. BUSINESS AGENDA A. 2011 Justice Assistance Grant As information only, Police staff shared with the Committee a recently received grant from the Department of Justice Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) in the amount of $21,309. This grant will be utilized for emergency equipment and technology, specifically for the following: Purchase of Administrative Investigations Management Software for logging, tracking, analysis and management of multiple internal projects. Purchase of critical first responder active shooter Go -Bags and support equipment. This grant is under the $40,000 budgetary threshold, and therefore, does not require full Council approval. INFORMATION ONLY. B. Resolution: Non Represented Emplovee 2012 Wage and Benefit Package The Committee Members have received additional information relative to this item and have requested the item be moved to the December 6, 2011; Finance Safety Committee meeting so that there is ample time to review the new information. Updated information will be provided in the agenda packet for that meeting. RETURN TO DECEMBER 6 COMMITTEE. C. Resolution: New Finance Chanae Fund Staff is seeking Council approval of a resolution that will establish a second change fund in the amount of $100.00 for the Finance Department. The addition of the change fund is needed for a second cash register that has been installed in Finance Department for cash transactions related to customer purchases and payments. This will require the repeal of Resolution No. 1721. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. D. Miscellaneous Revenue Report Sales tax revenues continue to be above budget, with increased revenues in comparison to the same time last year. August 2011 sales tax actuals are almost identical to 2010; hopefully, this flattening in receipts will not be a trend. Finance staff also reviewed the top 10 industry classification and the 10 largest declines. Both gambling and admissions taxes are below budget. The Committee requested that the sales tax information be provided in two charts, rather than one (as seen on page 41 of the agenda packet). One chart would reflect retail sales tax and the other would reflect construction sales tax. INFORMATION ONLY. FI x COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials ITEM NO. Meeting Date Prepared by Mayors review CouV6V review 11/28/11 PM C 12/05/11 PM 4.C. ITEM INFORMATION CAS NUMI31?R: ST. \F' SPONSOR: PEGGY MCCARTHY ORIGIN/U,AGL,NDA DA'1'L: 11/28/11 AGI3NDA IT ,M Trrl,r, An ordinance authorizing refunding of the arterial street portion of the Limited General Obligation Bonds 2003. Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Heariiia Other NIt Date 11/28/11 11Ytg Date Alt Date iAlig Date 1215111 A7tg Date t12tg Date Alt g Date SPONSOIZ Council Mayor HR DCD Finance Fire IT P &R Police Pldl SPONSOR'S The City issued $12,050,000 of limited tax general obligation bonds in 2003 to finance SUMMARY arterial street improvements and the construction of the golf course clubhouse. The proposed refunding would defease the bonds outstanding at December 1, 2013, the earliest call date. The savings from the refunding is estimated at $354,651.95 or 4.878% of the refunded bonds with $281,442.17 realized from the arterial street fund portion of the bond issue and $136,209.78 realized from the golf course portion of the bond issue. RI ;vI I?��tliD RY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 09/20/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: KATHY HOUGARDY RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Finance COMMrrrI =,I`; For Discussion; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXIII� ;NDITURI; RI ?OUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0 $0.00 $0 Fund Source: Connnents. MTG.DATEI RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 09/26/11 I Return to a future Committee of the Whole Meeting 11/28/11 MTG. DATE 09/26/11 11/28/11 ATTACHMENTS Informational Memorandum dated 09/14/11; revised 9 -21 -11 Draft Bond Refunding Ordinance Sumary of Refunding Results Proposed Refunding of 2003A LTGO Bonds Sumary of Refunding Results Proposed Refunding of 2003A LTGO Bonds Street only Informational Memorandum dated 11/21/11 Ordinance in draft form Minutes from the 9/20/11 F &S and 9/26/11 Committee of the Whole Meetings 45 m City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Councilmembers FROM: Peggy McCarthy, Interim Finance Director DATE: November 21, 2011 SUBJECT: Refunding of the Arterial Street Fund 104 portion of the General Obligation Bonds 2003 ISSUE Approve refunding of the Arterial Street Fund 104 portion of the General Obligation Bonds 2003. BACKGROUND The City issued general obligation bonds in 2003 to finance Arterial Street Fund 104 capital improvements and capital improvements in other funds. Of the total issue, $6,277,500 was allocated to the Arterial Street Fund 104; the outstanding balance of this bond issue being considered for refunding is $4,633,241. DISCUSSION Interest rates have declined to make refunding these bonds financially advantageous to the City at this time. The present value savings is estimated at $202,804 or 4.36 If Council authorizes this refunding and interest rates remain at a level that continues to make the refunding feasible, the bond pricing and sale will occur on December 12, 2011. RECOMMENDATION The Council is being asked to consider the refunding of the Arterial Street Fund 104 portion of the 2003 General Obligation bonds at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole Council meeting and to approve this item at December 5, 2011 Regular Meeting. ATTACHMENT Draft of bond ordinance. WA2011 Info Memos- CounciNnfoMemo ITGO 2003 refunding (104 portion).docx 47 WLLOJ FAR AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO CONTRACTING INDEBTEDNESS; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF NOT TO EXCEED $5,000,000 PAR VALUE OF LIMITED TAX GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS, 2011, TO PROVIDE THE FUNDS WITH WHICH TO CARRY OUT AN ADVANCE REFUNDING OF THE CALLABLE PORTION OF THE SHARE OF THE CITY'S LIMITED TAX GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2003A ALLOCATED TO STREET IMPROVEMENTS, AND TO PAY THE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS OF THE REFUNDING AND THE COSTS OF ISSUANCE AND SALE OF THE BONDS; PROVIDING FOR AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF CERTAIN OBLIGATIONS OUT OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE SALE OF THE BONDS HEREIN AUTHORIZED AND FOR THE USE AND APPLICATION OF THE MONEY DERIVED FROM THOSE INVESTMENTS; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS REFUNDING TRUSTEE; PROVIDING FOR THE CALL, PAYMENT AND REDEMPTION OF THE OUTSTANDING BONDS TO BE REFUNDED; FIXING CERTAIN TERMS AND COVENANTS OF THE BONDS; APPOINTING THE FINANCE DIRECTOR AS THE CITY'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE TO APPROVE THE FINAL TERMS OF THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF THE BONDS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR RELATED MATTERS. WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2027, the City heretofore issued the 2003A Bonds (defined below), and by that ordinance reserved the right to redeem the 2003A Bonds prior to their maturity on December 1, 2013, at a price of par plus accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption; and WHEREAS, there are presently outstanding $8,400,000 par value of 2003A Bonds, of which $4,605,000 mature on December 1 of each of the years 2014 through 2021, inclusive, and 2023, bear various interest rates from 3.95% to 4.65 and are entirely allocable to street improvements (the "Refunded Bonds and W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 1 of 19 i WHEREAS, after due consideration, it appears to the City Council that the Refunded Bonds may be refunded by the issuance and sale of the limited tax general obligation refunding bonds authorized herein (the "Bonds so that a substantial savings will be effected by the difference between the principal and interest cost over the life of the Bonds and the principal and interest cost over the life of the Refunded Bonds but for such refunding, which refunding will be effected by carrying out the Refunding Plan; and WHEREAS, to effect that refunding in the manner that will be most advantageous to the City it is found necessary and advisable that certain Acquired Obligations (defined below) bearing interest and maturing at such time or times as necessary to accomplish the refunding as aforesaid be purchased out of a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds and other money of the City, if necessary; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interests of the City to issue and sell the Bonds to pay the cost of carrying out the Refunding Plan (defined below); WHEREAS, RCW 39.46.040(2) provides that an ordinance authorizing the issuance of bonds may authorize an officer of the City to serve as the City's designated representative and to accept, on behalf of the City, an offer to purchase those bonds so long as the acceptance of such offer is consistent with the terms established by an ordinance that establishes, or sets parameters with respect to, the following final terms: the amount, date or dates, denominations, interest rate or rates (or mechanism for determining interest rate or rates); payment dates, final maturity, redemption rights, price, minimum savings for refunding bonds (if the refunding bonds are issued for savings purposes), and any other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Definitions. As used in this ordinance, the following words shall have the following meanings: A. "Acquired Obligations" means those United States Treasury Certificates of Indebtedness, Notes, and Bonds -State and Local Government Series and other direct, noncallable obligations of the United States of America purchased to accomplish the refunding of the Refunded Bonds as authorized by this ordinance. B. "Authorized Denomination" means $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof within a maturity. C. "Beneficial Owner" means the owner of any beneficial interests in the Bonds. D. "Bond Counsel" means Foster Pepper PLLC or any other nationally recognized bond counsel firm then representing the City. E. "Bond Fund" means the Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bond Fund, 2011, created by this ordinance for the payment of the Bonds. W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrn Page 2 of 19 50 F. "Bond Purchase Contract" means a purchase contract presented to the City by the Underwriter offering to purchase the Bonds under the terms and conditions provided therein. G. "Bond Register" means the books or records maintained by the Bond Registrar for the purpose of identifying ownership of the Bonds. H. "Bond Registrar" means the Fiscal Agent. I. "2003A Bonds" means the City's $9,850,000 par value Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003A, issued for the purpose of providing funds with which to reimburse itself for a part of the cost of transferring certain property between the City and King County, to pay or reimburse itself for a part of the cost of making various arterial street improvements, to redeem the City's outstanding Limited Tax General Obligation Bond Anticipation Note, 2000 (Foster Golf Course), and to pay the costs of issuance of the 2003A Bonds. J. "Bonds" means the not to exceed $5,000,000 par value Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds, 2011, of the City issued pursuant to and for the purposes provided in this ordinance. K. "City" means the City of Tukwila, Washington, a municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State. L. "City Council" means the governing body of the City, acting in its legislative capacity. M. "Closing Date" means the date on which the Bonds are delivered to the Underwriter upon payment in full therefor. N. "Code" means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. O. "Designated Representative" means the Finance Director, as appointed in Section 4 of this ordinance to serve as the City's designated representative in accordance with RCW 39.46.040(2) for purposes of accepting, on behalf of the City, an offer to purchase the Bonds on terms consistent with this ordinance and the parameters set forth herein. P. "DTC" means The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York. Q. "Final Terms" means the terms and conditions for the sale of the Bonds including, but not limited to the amount, date or dates, denominations, interest rate or rates (or mechanism for determining interest rate or rates), payment dates, final maturity, redemption rights, price, and minimum savings for refunding bonds (if the refunding bonds are issued for savings purposes). R. "Finance Director" means the Finance Director of the City or the successor officer, including without limitation any person acting in the capacity of the City's Finance Director. W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 3 of 19 51 S. "Fiscal Agent" means the fiscal agent of the State, as the same may be designated by the State from time to time. T. "Letter of Representations" means the Blanket Issuer Letter of Representations dated October 18, 1999, between the City and DTC, as it may be amended from time to time. U. "MSRB" means the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. V. "Owners" means, without distinction, the Registered Owner(s) and the Beneficial Owner(s). W. "Refunded Bond Ordinance" means Ordinance No. 2027 passed by the City Council on September 8, 2003 authorizing the issuance of the 2003A Bonds. X. "Refunded Bonds" means the $4,605,000 street improvements portion of the outstanding 2003A Bonds of the City maturing in the years 2014 through 2021, inclusive, and in 2023, issued pursuant to the Refunded Bond Ordinance, the refunding of which has been provided for by this ordinance. Y. "Refunding Plan" means: 1. the placement of sufficient proceeds of the Bonds which, with other money of the City, if necessary, will acquire the Acquired Obligations to be deposited, with cash, if necessary, with the Refunding Trustee; 2. the application of the principal of and interest on the Acquired Obligations (and any other cash balance) to the payment of interest on the Refunded Bonds when due up to and including December 1, 2013, and the call, payment, and redemption of the Refunded Bonds on December 1, 2013 at a price of par; and 3. the payment of the costs of issuing the Bonds and the costs of carrying out the foregoing elements of the Refunding Plan. Z. "Refunding Trust Agreement" means a refunding trust agreement between the City and the Refunding Trustee dated as of the Closing Date, that provides for the carrying out of the Refunding Plan. AA. "Refunding Trustee" means U.S. Bank National Association of Seattle, Washington, serving as refunding trustee or any successor thereto. BB. "Registered Owner" means the person in whose name a Bond is registered on the Bond Register. For so long as the City utilizes the book —entry system for the Bonds under the Letter of Representations, Registered Owner shall mean DTC. CC. "Registration Ordinance" means City Ordinance No. 1338 establishing a system of registration for the City's bonds and other obligations. DD. "Rule 15c2 -12" means Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. EE. "SEC" means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 4 of 19 52 FF. "State" means the State of Washington. GG. "Term Bonds" means those Bonds designated as such, with the maturity date or dates identified in the maturing in the Bond Purchase Contract. HH. "Undertaking" means the undertaking to provide continuing disclosure set forth in 15 of this ordinance. II. "Underwriter" means Seattle- Northwest Securities Corporation of Seattle, Washington. Section 2. Debt Capacity. The assessed valuation of the taxable property within the City as ascertained by the last preceding assessment for City purposes for the calendar year 2011 is $4,775,732,512. 1. The City has outstanding general indebtedness as follows: a. Limited tax general obligation bonds and leases outstanding in the principal amount of $23,386,800 (excluding the Refunded Bonds), which is incurred within the limit of up to 1Y2% of the value of the taxable property within the City permitted for general municipal purposes. b. No unlimited tax general obligation bonds for capital purposes only. 2. The amount of indebtedness authorized by this ordinance is an amount not to exceed $5,000,000 and is issued within the limitation permitted for general municipal purposes without a vote. Section 3. Purpose and Authorization of Bonds. In order to achieve a cost savings for the City, the City Council finds it to be in the best interest of the City to authorize the issuance and sale of the Bonds for the purposes described below. The City shall borrow money on the credit of the City and issue negotiable limited tax general obligation refunding bonds evidencing that indebtedness in the amount of not to exceed $5,000,000 to finance the cost of the Refunding Plan and to pay the costs of issuance and sale of the Bonds. Section 4. Description of Bonds; Appointment of Designated Representative. The Finance Director is appointed as the City's Designated Representative and is authorized to approve the Final Terms of the Bonds, within the following parameters: A. Amount. The Bonds shall not exceed the aggregate principal amount of $5,000,000. The principal amount of the Bonds (i) may exceed the principal amount of the Refunded Bonds being refunded by an amount deemed reasonably required to effect such refunding, or (ii) may be less than or the same as the principal amount of the Refunded Bonds, so long as provision is duly and sufficiently made for the retirement or redemption of those Refunded Bonds. B. Date or Dates. The Bonds shall be dated as of the Closing Date, which date may not be later than December 31, 2011. W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 5 of 19 53 C. Denominations, Designation, etc. The Bonds shall be issued in Authorized Denominations and shall be numbered separately in the manner and bear any name and additional designation as deemed necessary or appropriate by the Designated Representative. D. Interest Rate(s). The Bonds shall bear interest at fixed rates per annum (computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months) from their date or from the most recent interest payment date for which interest has been paid or duly provided for, whichever is later. One or more rates of interest may be fixed for the Bonds, which rate or rates must be in multiples of 1 /8 or 1 /20 of 1 or both. The "alkin" true interest cost to the City for the Bonds may not exceed 3.00 E. Payment Dates. Interest must be payable at fixed rates semiannually (on each June 1 and December 1, or such other semiannual dates as are selected by the Designated Representative), commencing on the next such semiannual date following the issuance of the Bonds. Principal must be payable annually (on each December 1, or such other annual date as is selected by the Designated Representative) commencing no earlier than the next such annual date following the issuance of the Bonds. F. Final Maturity. The Bonds shall not extend over a longer period of time than the Refunded Bonds. G. Redemption Rights. The Bonds shall be subject to optional and mandatory redemption provisions, including designation of Term Bonds, if any, as set forth in Section 8. H. Purchase Price. The purchase price for the Bonds may not be less than 95% or more than 115% of the par value of the Bonds. I. Minimum Savings for Refunding Bonds. The Bonds much achieve a minimum net present value savings of 3.00% over the scheduled principal and interest of the Refunded Bonds, giving consideration to the fixed maturities of the Bonds and the Refunded Bonds, the costs of issuance of the Bonds, and the known earned income from the investment of Bond proceeds in the Acquired Obligations, pending redemption of the Refunded Bonds. J. Other Terms and Conditions. 1. The Designated Representative may determine that it is in the City's best interest to provide for bond insurance or other credit enhancement, and may accept, on behalf of the City, such additional terms, conditions, and covenants as may be required by the bond insurer, if consistent with the provisions of this ordinance. 2. The Designated Representative is also authorized to take such additional action as may be necessary or convenient for the refunding of the Refunded Bonds and for the issuance of the Bonds pursuant to the terms of this ordinance. W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 6 of 19 54 Section 5. Bond Registrar; Registration and Transfer of Bonds. A. Registration of Bonds. The Bonds shall be issued only in registered form as to both principal and interest and shall be recorded on the Bond Register. B. Bond Registrar. The Bond Registrar shall keep, or cause to be kept, sufficient books for the registration and transfer of the Bonds, which shall be open to inspection by the City at all times. The Bond Register shall contain the name and mailing address of the Registered Owner of each Bond and the principal amount and number of each of the Bonds held by each Registered Owner. The Bond Registrar is authorized, on behalf of the City, to authenticate and deliver Bonds transferred or exchanged in accordance with the provisions of the Bonds and this ordinance, to serve as the City's paying agent for the Bonds and to carry out all of the Bond Registrar's powers and duties under this ordinance and City's Registration Ordinance. The Bond Registrar shall be responsible for its representations contained in the Bond Registrar's Certificate of Authentication on the Bonds. The Bond Registrar may become either a Registered or Beneficial Owner of Bonds with the same rights it would have if it were not the Bond Registrar and, to the extent permitted by law, may act as depository for and permit any of its officers or directors to act as members of, or in any other capacity with respect to, any committee formed to protect the rights of Beneficial Owners. C. Transfer and Exchange of Bonds. Bonds surrendered to the Bond Registrar may be exchanged for Bonds in any Authorized Denomination of an equal aggregate principal amount and of the same interest rate and maturity. Bonds may be transferred only if endorsed in the manner provided thereon and surrendered to the Bond Registrar. Any exchange or transfer shall be without cost to the owner or transferee. The Bond Registrar shall not be obligated to exchange or transfer any Bond during the 15 days preceding any principal payment or redemption date. D. DTC and the Book Entry System. The Bonds initially shall be registered in the name of Cede Co., as the nominee of DTC. The Bonds so registered shall be held in fully immobilized form by DTC as depository in accordance with the provisions of the Letter of Representations. Neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall have any responsibility or obligation to DTC participants or the persons for whom they act as nominees with respect to the Bonds regarding accuracy of any records maintained by DTC or DTC participants of any amount in respect of principal of or interest on the Bonds, or any notice which is permitted or required to be given to Registered Owners hereunder (except such notice as is required to be given by the Bond Registrar to DTC). For as long as any Bonds are held in fully immobilized form, DTC, its nominee or its successor depository shall be deemed to be the Registered Owner for all purposes hereunder and all references to registered owners, bondowners, bondholders or the like shall mean DTC or its nominee and, except for the purpose of the City's undertaking herein to provide continuing disclosure, shall not mean the Beneficial Owners. Registered ownership of such Bonds, or any portions thereof, may not thereafter be W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 7 of 19 55 transferred except: (i) to any successor of DTC or its nominee, if that successor shall be qualified under any applicable laws to provide the services proposed to be provided by it; (ii) to any substitute depository appointed by the City or such substitute depository's successor; or (iii) to any person if the Bonds are no longer held in immobilized form. Upon the resignation of DTC or its successor (or any substitute depository or its successor) from its functions as depository, or a determination by the City that it no longer wishes to continue the system of book entry transfers through DTC or its successor (or any substitute depository or its successor), the City may appoint a substitute depository. Any such substitute depository shall be qualified under any applicable laws to provide the services proposed to be provided by it. If (i) DTC or its successor (or substitute depository or its successor) resigns from its functions as depository, and no substitute depository can be obtained or (ii) the City determines that the Bonds are to be in certificated form, the ownership of Bonds may be transferred to any person as provided herein and the Bonds no longer shall be held in fully immobilized form. Section 6. Form and Execution of Bonds. The Bonds shall be prepared in a form consistent with the provisions of this ordinance and State law and shall be signed by the Mayor and City Clerk, either or both of whose signatures may be manual or in facsimile, and the seal of the City or a facsimile reproduction thereof shall be impressed or printed thereon. Only Bonds bearing a Certificate of Authentication in the following form, manually signed by the Bond Registrar, shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits of this ordinance: "Certificate Of Authentication. This Bond is one of the fully registered City of Tukwila, Washington, Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bonds, 2011, described in the Bond Ordinance." The authorized signing of a Certificate of Authentication shall be conclusive evidence that the Bond so authenticated has been duly executed, authenticated and delivered and is entitled to the benefits of this ordinance. If any officer whose manual or facsimile signature appears on the Bonds ceases to be an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds before the Bonds bearing his or her manual or facsimile signature are authenticated or delivered by the Bond Registrar or issued by the City, those Bonds nevertheless may be authenticated, issued and delivered and, when authenticated, issued and delivered, shall be as binding on the City as though that person had continued to be an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds. Any Bond also may be signed on behalf of the City by any person who, on the actual date of signing of the Bond, is an officer of the City authorized to sign bonds, although he or she did not hold the required office on the date of issuance of the Bonds. Section 7. Payment of Bonds. Both principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America. For as long as the Bonds are registered in the name of DTC or its nominee, payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be made in the manner set forth in the Letter of Representations. If the Bonds cease to be in book entry-only form, interest on the Bonds shall be paid by W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 8 of 19 56 checks or drafts of the Bond Registrar mailed on the interest payment date to the Registered Owners at the addresses appearing on the Bond Register on the 15th day of the month preceding the interest payment date or by electronic transfer on the interest payment date. The City shall not be required to make electronic transfers except to a Registered Owner of Bonds pursuant to a request in writing (and at the sole expense of that Registered Owner) received at least 10 days before an interest payment date. Principal of the Bonds shall be payable upon presentation and surrender of the Bonds by the Registered Owners to the Bond Registrar. Section 8. Redemption Provisions and Open Market Purchase of Bonds. A. Optional Redemption. The Designated Representative may approve the designation of certain maturities of the Bonds as being subject to redemption at the option of the City prior to their respective maturities on the dates and at the prices set forth in the Bond Purchase Contract. The Designated Representative may also, in his or her discretion, approve the designation of certain maturities of the Bonds as not being subject to redemption prior to maturity. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this ordinance, if the final maturity of the Bonds is more than 10 Y2 years after the Closing Date, the Bonds then outstanding shall be subject to optional redemption on at least one date that occurs less than 10 Y2 years after the Closing Date. B. Term Bonds. The Designated Representative may approve the designation of certain maturities of the Bonds as Term Bonds, as set forth in the Bond Purchase Contract. The City shall redeem Term Bonds, if not previously redeemed under any optional redemption provisions or purchased and surrendered for cancellation under the provisions set forth below, at a price of par plus accrued interest on the annual redemption dates and in annual redemption amounts approved by the Designated Representative. If the City redeems under the optional redemption provisions, purchases in the open market or defeases Term Bonds, the par amount of the Term Bonds so redeemed, purchased or defeased (irrespective of their actual redemption or purchase prices) shall be credited against one or more scheduled mandatory redemption amounts for those Term Bonds. The City shall determine the manner in which the credit is to be allocated and shall notify the Bond Registrar in writing of its allocation prior to the earliest mandatory redemption date for that maturity of Term Bonds for which notice of redemption has not already been given. C. Partial Redemptions. Portions of the principal amount of any Bond, in any Authorized Denomination, may be redeemed. If less than all of the principal amount of any Bond is redeemed, upon surrender of that Bond to the Bond Registrar, there shall be issued to the Registered Owner, without charge, a new Bond (or Bonds, at the option of the Registered Owner) of the same maturity and interest rate in any Authorized Denomination in the aggregate principal amount remaining unredeemed. D. Selection of Bonds for Redemption. If fewer than all of the outstanding Bonds within a maturity are to be redeemed prior to maturity, selection of Bonds for redemption shall be randomly within a maturity in such manner as the Bond Registrar shall determine. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for as long as the Bonds are registered W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 9 of 19 57 in the name of DTC or its nominee, selection of Bonds for redemption shall be in accordance with the Letter of Representations. E. Notice of Redemption. While the Bonds are held by DTC in book -entry only form, any notice of redemption shall be given at the time, to the entity and in the manner required by DTC in accordance with the Letter of Representations, and the Bond Registrar shall not be required to give any other notice of redemption. If the Bonds cease to be in book -entry only form unless waived by any Registered Owner of the Bonds to be redeemed, the City shall cause notice of any intended redemption of Bonds to be given by the Bond Registrar not less than 20 nor more than 60 days prior to the date fixed for redemption by first -class mail, postage prepaid, to the Registered Owner of any Bond to be redeemed at the address appearing on the Bond Register at the time the Bond Registrar prepares the notice, and the requirements of this sentence shall be deemed to have been fulfilled when notice has been mailed as so provided, whether or not it is actually received by the Registered or Beneficial Owner of any Bond. In the case of an optional redemption, the notice may state that the City retains the right to rescind the redemption notice and the related optional redemption of Bonds by giving a notice of rescission to the affected Registered Owners at any time prior to the scheduled optional redemption date. Any notice of optional redemption that is so rescinded shall be of no effect, and the Bonds for which the notice of optional redemption has been rescinded shall remain outstanding. In addition, the redemption notice shall be mailed or sent electronically within the same period to the MSRB, consistent with the Undertaking, to any nationally recognized rating agency which at the time maintains a rating on the Bonds at the request of the City, and to such other persons and with such additional information as the Finance Director shall determine, but these additional mailings shall not be a condition precedent to the redemption of Bonds. F. Effect of Redemption. Interest on Bonds called for redemption shall cease to accrue on the date fixed for redemption, except in the case of a rescinded optional redemption as described above, or unless the Bond or Bonds called are not redeemed when presented pursuant to the call. G. Open Market Purchase. The City further reserves the right and option to purchase any or all of the Bonds in the open market at any time at any price acceptable to the City plus accrued interest to the date of purchase. H. Cancellation of Bonds. All Bonds purchased or redeemed under this section shall be canceled. Section 9. Failure To. Redeem Bonds. If any Bond is not redeemed when properly presented at its maturity or date set for redemption, the City shall be obligated to pay interest on that Bond at the same rate provided in the Bond from and after its maturity or date set for redemption until that Bond, both principal and interest, is paid in full or until sufficient money for its payment in full is on deposit in the Bond Fund and the Bond has been called for payment by giving notice of that call to the Registered Owner. W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 10 of 19 i Section 10. Pledge of Taxes. For as long as any of the Bonds are outstanding, the City irrevocably pledges to include in its budget and levy taxes annually, within the constitutional and statutory tax limitations provided by law without a vote of the electors of the City, on all of the taxable property within the City in an amount sufficient, together with other money legally available and to be used therefor, to pay when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds. The full faith, credit and resources of the City are pledged irrevocably for the annual levy and collection of those taxes and the prompt payment of that principal and interest. Section 11. Refunding of the Refunded Bonds. A. Appointment of Refunding Trustee. U.S. Bank National Association of Seattle, Washington, is hereby appointed Refunding Trustee. B. Authorization for Refunding Trust Agreement. The Designated Representative and the Mayor are each independently authorized to execute and deliver to the Refunding Trustee a Refunding Trust Agreement, which sets forth duties, obligations and responsibilities of the Refunding Trustee in connection with the Refunding Plan, provisions for payment of the fees, compensation and expenses of such Refunding Trustee, and such other provisions as may be necessary so that the Bonds are in compliance with the requirements of federal law governing the exclusion of interest on the Bonds from gross income for federal income tax purposes. C. Use of Bond Proceeds. Proceeds from the sale of the Bonds in the amount sufficient to carrying out the Refunding Plan shall be deposited immediately upon the receipt thereof with the Refunding Trustee and used to discharge the obligations of the City relating to the Refunded Bonds under the Refunded Bond Ordinance by providing for the payment of the amounts required to be paid by the Refunding Plan. Such obligations shall be discharged fully by the Refunding Trustee's simultaneous purchase of Acquired Obligations, bearing such interest and maturing as to principal and interest in such amounts and at such times so as to provide, together with a beginning cash balance, if necessary, for the payment of the amounts required to be paid by the Refunding Plan. The Acquired Obligations shall be listed and more particularly described in the Refunding Trust Agreement, but are subject to substitution as set forth below. The Designated Representative is authorized and directed to approve the Acquired Obligations to be purchased. The Designated Representative also is authorized, in his or her discretion, to cause the City to transfer to the Refunding Trustee, for purposes of accomplishing the Refunding Plan, all or a portion of the money on deposit in the Bond Fund immediately preceding the Closing Date. Any Bond proceeds or other money deposited with the Refunding Trustee not needed to carry out the Refunding Plan shall be returned to the City as soon as reasonably practicable following the delivery of the Bonds to the Underwriter. Any Bond proceeds so returned to the City shall be deposited in the Bond Fund and used to pay interest on the Bonds on the first interest payment date. D. Substitution of Acquired Obligations. Prior to the purchase of any Acquired Obligations, the City reserves the right to substitute other noncallable, nonprepayable direct obligations of the United States of America "Substitute Obligations for any of W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrn Page 11 of 19 59 the Acquired Obligations and to use any savings created thereby for any lawful City purpose if, (i) in the opinion of Bond Counsel the interest on the Bonds and the Refunded Bonds will remain excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes under Sections 103, 148 and 149(d) of the Code, and (ii) such substitution shall not impair the timely payment of the amounts required to be paid by the Refunding Plan, as verified by a nationally recognized independent certified public accounting firm. After the purchase of the Acquired Obligations by the Refunding Trustee, the City reserves the right to substitute therefor cash or Substitute Obligations subject to the conditions that such money or securities held by the Refunding Trustee shall be sufficient to carry out the Refunding Plan, that such substitution will not cause the Bonds or the Refunded Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code and regulations thereunder in effect on the date of such substitution and applicable to obligations issued on the Closing Date, and that the City obtain, at its expense: (i) a verification by a nationally recognized independent certified public accounting firm confirming that the payments of principal of and interest on the Substitute Obligations, if paid when due, and any other money held by the Refunding Trustee will be sufficient to carry out the Refunding Plan; and (ii) an opinion from Bond Counsel to the effect that the disposition and substitution or purchase of the Substitute Obligations, under the statutes, rules and regulations then in force and applicable to the Bonds, will not cause the interest on the Bonds or the Refunded Bonds to be included in gross income for federal income tax purposes and that such disposition and substitution or purchase is in compliance with the statutes and regulations applicable to the Bonds and the Refunded Bonds. Any surplus money resulting from the sale, transfer, other disposition or redemption of the Acquired Obligations and Substitute Obligations therefor shall be released from the Refunding Trustee and transferred to the City to be used for any lawful City purpose. E. Administration of Refunding Plan. The Refunding Trustee is authorized and directed to purchase the Acquired Obligations (or Substitute Obligations) and to make the payments required to be made by the Refunding Plan from the Acquired Obligations (or Substitute Obligations) and money deposited with the Refunding Trustee pursuant to this ordinance. All Acquired Obligations (or Substitute Obligations) and money deposited with the Refunding Trustee and any income therefrom shall be held irrevocably, invested and applied in accordance with the provisions of the Refunded Bond Ordinance, this ordinance, chapter 39.53 RCW and other applicable laws of the State and the Refunding Trust Agreement. All necessary and proper fees, compensation and expenses of the Refunding Trustee and all other costs of carrying out the Refunding Plan and issuing the Bonds, including bond printing, rating service fees, verification fees, Bond Counsel's fees and other related expenses, shall be paid out of the proceeds of the Bonds. F. Call for Redemption of Refunded Bonds. Effective upon the City's initial delivery of the Bonds to the Underwriter in exchange for the purchase price thereof, the City calls for redemption on December 1, 2013, all of the Refunded Bonds at the price of par plus accrued interest. Such call for redemption shall be irrevocable once it becomes effective. The date on which the Refunded Bonds are herein called for redemption is the first date on which those bonds may be called. The Refunding W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 12 of 19 01 Trustee is authorized and directed to give or cause to be given such notices as required, at the times and in the manner required, pursuant to the Refunded Bond Ordinance and the Refunding Trust Agreement in order to effect the redemption of the Refunded Bonds prior to their stated maturity dates. G. Additional Findings and Determinations with Respect to the Refunding. Prior to the execution of the Bond Purchase Agreement, the Designated Representative must determine, on behalf of the City, that the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds will effect a net present value savings to the City and its taxpayers of at least 3.00% as set forth in Section 4 hereof. The City Council finds and determines that such net present value savings is a substantial savings and that achieving such net present value savings by issuing the Bonds is in the best interest of the City. In making such finding and determination, the City Council has given consideration to the fixed maturities of the Bonds and the Refunded Bonds, the costs related to the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds and the known earned income from the investment of the proceeds of the issuance and sale of the Bonds used in the Refunding Plan pending payment and redemption of the Refunded Bonds. The City Council further finds and determines that the money to be deposited with the Refunding Trustee for the Refunded Bonds in accordance with this Section 11 will discharge and satisfy the obligations of the City under the Refunded Bond Ordinance with respect to the Refunded Bonds, and the pledges, charges, trusts, covenants and agreements of the City therein made or provided for as to the Refunded Bonds, and that the Refunded Bonds shall no longer be deemed to be outstanding under the Refunded Bond Ordinance immediately upon the deposit of such money with the Refunding Trustee. Section 12. Tax Covenants; Designation of Bonds as "Qualified Tax Exempt Obligations." A. Preservation of Tax Exemption for Interest on Bonds. The City covenants that it will take all actions necessary to prevent interest on the Bonds from being included in gross income for federal income tax purposes, and it will neither take any action nor make or permit any use of proceeds of the Bonds or other funds of the City treated as proceeds of the Bonds at any time during the term of the Bonds which will cause interest on the Bonds to be included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. The City also covenants that it will, to the extent the arbitrage rebate requirements of Section 148 of the Code are applicable to the Bonds, take all actions necessary to comply (or to be treated as having complied) with those requirements in connection with the Bonds, including the calculation and payment of any penalties that the City has elected to pay as an alternative to calculating rebatable arbitrage, and the payment of any other penalties if required under Section 148 of the Code to prevent interest on the Bonds from being included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. The Designated Representative is authorized and directed to adopt and implement on behalf of the City procedures to facilitate compliance by the City with the covenants in this Section 12(A) and the applicable requirements of the Code that must be satisfied after the issue date to maintain the tax exemption for interest on the 2003A Bonds and the Bonds after the Closing Date. W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 13 of 19 61 B. Designation of Bonds as "Qualified Tax Exempt Obligations." The City has determined and certifies that (i) the Bonds are not "private activity bonds" within the meaning of Section 141 of the Code; (ii) the reasonably anticipated amount of tax exempt obligations (other than private activity bonds and other obligations not required to be included in such calculation) which the City and any entity subordinate to the City (including any entity that the City controls, that derives its authority to issue tax exempt obligations from the City, or that issues tax exempt obligations on behalf of the City) will issue during the calendar year in which the Bonds are issued will not exceed $10,000,000; and (iii) the amount of tax exempt obligations, including the Bonds, designated by the City as "qualified tax exempt obligations" for the purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code during the calendar year in which the Bonds are issued does not exceed $10,000,000. The City designates the Bonds as "qualified tax exempt obligations" for the purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code. Section 13. Refunding or Defeasance of the Bonds. The City may issue refunding bonds pursuant to the laws of the State or use money available from any other lawful source to pay when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds, or any portion thereof included in a refunding or defeasance plan, and to redeem and retire, refund or defease all such then outstanding Bonds (hereinafter collectively called the "defeased Bonds and to pay the costs of the refunding or defeasance. If money and /or "government obligations" (as defined in chapter 39.53 RCW, as now or hereafter amended) maturing at a time or times and bearing interest in amounts (together with money, if necessary) sufficient to redeem and retire, refund or defease the defeased Bonds in accordance with their terms are set aside in a special trust fund or escrow account irrevocably pledged to that redemption, retirement or defeasance of defeased Bonds (hereinafter called the "trust account then all right and interest of the Owners of the defeased Bonds in the covenants of this ordinance and in the funds and accounts obligated to the payment of the defeased Bonds shall cease and become void. The Owners of defeased Bonds shall have the right to receive payment of the principal of and interest on the defeased Bonds from the trust account. The City shall include in the refunding or defeasance plan such provisions as the City deems necessary for the random selection of any defeased Bonds that constitute less than all of a particular maturity of the Bonds, for notice of the defeasance to be given to the owners of the defeased Bonds and to such other persons as the City shall determine, and for any required replacement of Bond certificates for defeased Bonds. The defeased Bonds shall be deemed no longer outstanding, and the City may apply any money in any other fund or account established for the payment or redemption of the defeased Bonds to any lawful purposes as it shall determine. If the Bonds are registered in the name of DTC or its nominee, notice of any defeasance of Bonds shall be given to DTC in the manner prescribed in the Letter of Representations for notices of redemption of Bonds. Section 14. Bond Fund and Deposit of Bond Proceeds. A. Bond Fund. The Bond Fund is hereby created and established in the office of the Finance Director as a special fund designated the Limited Tax General Obligation Refunding Bond Fund, 2011, for the purpose of paying principal of and interest on the W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 14 of 19 62 Bonds. All taxes and other amounts allocated to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be deposited in the Bond Fund. B. Deposit of Bond Proceeds. The principal proceeds and premium, if any, received from the sale and delivery of the Bonds shall be used to pay the costs of sale and issuance of the Bonds and deposited, invested and used in accordance with the Refunding Plan. Section 15. Undertaking to Provide Continuing Disclosure. To meet the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of Rule 15c2 -12, as applicable to a participating underwriter for the Bonds, the City makes the following written Undertaking for the benefit of holders of the Bonds: A. Undertaking to Provide Annual Financial Information and Notice of Listed Events. The City undertakes to provide or cause to be provided, either directly or through a designated agent, to the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB, accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB: (i) Annual financial information and operating data of the type included in the final official statement for the Bonds and described in subsection (B) of this section "annual financial information (ii) Timely notice (not in excess of 10 business days after the occurrence of the event) of the occurrence of any of the following events with respect to the Bonds: (1) principal and interest payment delinquencies; (2) non payment related defaults, if material; (3) unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties, (4) unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (5) substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (6) adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notice of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701 TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the Bonds; (7) modifications to rights of holders of the Bonds, if material; (8) bond calls (other than scheduled mandatory redemptions of Term Bonds), if material, and tender offers; (9) defeasances; (10) release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the Bonds, if material; (11) rating changes; (12) bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the City, as such "Bankruptcy Events" are defined in Rule 15c2 -12; (13) the consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving the City or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the City other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material; and (14) appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material. (iii) Timely notice of a failure by the City to provide required annual financial information on or before the date specified in subsection (B) of this section. B. Type of Annual Financial Information Undertaken to be Provided. The annual financial information that the City undertakes to provide in subsection (A) of this section: W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 15 of 19 63 (i) Shall consist of (1) annual financial statements prepared (except as noted in the financial statements) in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to State local governmental units such as the City, as such principles may be changed from time to time, which statements shall not be audited, except, however, that if and when audited financial statements are otherwise prepared and available to the City they will be provided; (2) outstanding general obligation bonds, (3) assessed valuation for the fiscal year; (4) regular property tax levy rate and regular property tax levy rate limit for the fiscal year; and (5) general fund revenues from other major tax sources; and (ii) Shall be provided not later than the last day of the ninth month after the end of each fiscal year of the City (currently, a fiscal year ending December 31), as such fiscal year may be changed as required or permitted by State law, commencing with the City's fiscal year ending December 31, 2012; and (iii) May be provided in a single or multiple documents, and may be incorporated by specific reference to documents available to the public on the Internet website of the MSRB or filed with the SEC. C. Amendment of Undertaking. The Undertaking is subject to amendment after the primary offering of the Bonds without the consent of any holder of any Bond, or of any broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer, participating underwriter, rating agency or the MSRB, under the circumstances and in the manner permitted by Rule 15c2 -12. The City will give notice to the MSRB of the substance (or provide a copy) of any amendment to the Undertaking and a brief statement of the reasons for the amendment. If the amendment changes the type of annual financial information to be provided, the annual financial information containing the amended financial information will include a narrative explanation of the effect of that change on the type of information to be provided. D. Beneficiaries. The Undertaking evidenced by this section shall inure to the benefit of the City and any Beneficial Owner of Bonds, and shall not inure to the benefit of or create any rights in any other person. E. Termination of Undertaking. The City's obligations under this Undertaking. shall terminate upon the legal defeasance of all of the Bonds. In addition, the City's obligations under this Undertaking shall terminate if those provisions of Rule 15c2 -12 which require the City to comply with this Undertaking become legally inapplicable in respect of the Bonds for any reason, as confirmed by an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel or other counsel familiar with federal securities laws delivered to the City, and the City provides timely notice of such termination to the MSRB. F. Remedy for Failure to Comply with Undertaking. As soon as practicable after the City learns of any failure to comply with the Undertaking, the City will proceed with due diligence to cause such noncompliance to be corrected. No failure by the City or other obligated person to comply with the Undertaking shall constitute a default in respect of the Bonds. The sole remedy of any Beneficial Owner of a Bond shall be to take such actions as that Beneficial Owner deems necessary, including seeking an W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 16 of 19 .i order of specific performance from an appropriate court, to compel the City or other obligated person to comply with the Undertaking. G. Designation of Official Responsible to Administer Undertaking. The Finance Director of the City (or such other officer of the City who may in the future perform the duties of that office) or his or her designee is authorized and directed in his or her discretion to take such further actions as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to carry out.the Undertaking of the City in respect of the Bonds set forth in this section and in accordance with Rule 15c2 -12, including, without limitation, the following actions: (i) Preparing and filing the annual financial information undertaken to be provided; (ii) Determining whether any event specified in subsection (A) has occurred, assessing its materiality, where necessary, with respect to the Bonds, and preparing and disseminating any required notice of its occurrence; (iii) Determining whether any person other than the City is an "obligated person" within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 with respect to the Bonds, and obtaining from such person an undertaking to provide any annual financial information and notice of listed events for that person in accordance with Rule 15c2 -12; (iv) Selecting, engaging and compensating designated agents and consultants, including but not limited to financial advisors and legal counsel, to assist and advise the City in carrying out the Undertaking; and (v) Effecting any necessary amendment of the Undertaking. Section 16. General Authorization; Delivery of Bonds. The Designated Representative, the Mayor and other appropriate officers of the City are each authorized to do everything as in their judgment may be necessary, appropriate or desirable in order to carry out the terms and provisions of, and complete the transactions contemplated in connection with, this ordinance. The Bonds will be printed at City expense and will be delivered to the purchaser in accordance with the Bond Purchase Contract, with the approving legal opinion of Bond Counsel regarding the Bonds. Section 17. Official Statement. A. Preliminary Official Statement Under the Rule. The Designated Representative and the Mayor are each independently authorized to review and approve the information about the City contained in any preliminary official statement (the "Preliminary Official Statement prepared in connection with the public offering and sale of Bonds to be sold to the public; and (for the sole purpose of aiding the Underwriter in its compliance with Section (b)(1) of the Rule, if applicable) "deem final' that Preliminary Official Statement as of its date, except for the omission of information permitted to be omitted by the Rule and approve or ratify the distribution of that Preliminary Official Statement to potential purchasers of the Bonds. W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 17 of 19 65 B. Approval of Official Statement. The Designated Representative and the Mayor are each independently authorized to review and approve distribution of a final official statement with respect to the Bonds to be sold to the public. The City agrees to cooperate with the Underwriter to deliver or cause to be delivered, within such period as may be required by applicable law, copies of the final official statement pertaining to the Bonds in sufficient quantity to comply with paragraph (b)(4) of the Rules and rules of the MSRB. Section 18. Supplemental Ordinances. The City Council from time to time and at any time may pass an ordinance or ordinances supplemental to this ordinance which supplemental ordinance or ordinances thereafter shall become a part of this ordinance, for any one or more of the following purposes: A. To add to the covenants and agreements of the City in this ordinance such other covenants and agreements thereafter to be observed, which shall not adversely affect the interests of the holders and Owners of the Bonds, or to surrender any right or power herein reserved to or conferred upon the City. B. To make such provisions for the purpose of curing any ambiguities or of curing, correcting or supplementing any defective provision contained in this ordinance in regard to matters or questions arising under such ordinances as the City Council may deem necessary or desirable and not inconsistent with such ordinances and which shall not materially adversely affect the interest of the holders and Owners of the Bonds. Section 19. General Authorization and Ratification. The Designated Representative,- Mayor, City Administrator and other appropriate officers of the City are severally authorized and directed to take any actions and to execute documents as in their judgment may be necessary or desirable to carry out the terms of, and complete the transactions contemplated by, this ordinance and the Bond Purchase Contract (including everything necessary for the prompt delivery of the Bonds to the Underwriter and for the proper application, use and investment of the proceeds of the sale thereof), and all actions heretofore taken in furtherance thereof and not inconsistent with the terms of this ordinance are ratified and confirmed in all respects. Section 20. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. If a court of competent jurisdiction, all appeals having been exhausted or all appeal periods having run, finds any provision of this ordinance to be invalid or unenforceable as to any person or circumstance, such offending provision shall, if feasible, be deemed to be modified to be within the limits of enforceability or validity. However, if the offending provision cannot be so modified, it shall be null and void with respect to the particular person or circumstance, and all other provisions of this ordinance in all other respects, and the offending provision with respect to all other persons and all other circumstances, shall remain valid and enforceable. W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11 -22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 18 of 19 i- Section 21. Effective Date of Ordinance. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2011. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney Jim Haggerton, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: W: Word Processing \Ordinances\2003 Bond Refunding 11- 22- 2011 -final PM:mrh Page 19 of 19 67 x FINANCE AND SAFETY COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes September 20, 2011— 5:00 p. m.; Conference Room #3 City of Tukwila Finance and Safety Committee PRESENT Councilmembers: Kathy Hougardy, Chair; Joan Hernandez and Dennis Robertson Staff: Shawn Hunstock, Derek Speck, Peggy McCarthy, Jennifer Ferrer -Santa Ines, Katherine Kertzman, Ashley Comar, Gail Labanara and Kimberly Matej CALL TO ORDER: Chair Hougardy called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m. I. PRESENTATIONS No presentations. 11. BUSINESS AGENDA A. Advertising Agreement: Seattle Southside and Bonneville International Staff is seeking Council approval to enter into a multi -year agreement with Bonneville International for multi -media (on -line and radio) advertising for Seattle Southside Visitor Services (SSVS) in an amount not to exceed $84,000. This advertising campaign will run November 2011 through December 2012, and is funded jointly by SSVS cities of Tukwila, SeaTac, Kent and Des Moines. Both Tukwila Lodging Tax Advisory Board and SeaTac Hotel Motel Tax Advisory Committee have reviewed and approved this agreement. All costs for this agreement are funded through lodging tax funds and not general fund monies. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO SEPTEMBER 26 COW FOR DISCUSSION. B. Re- Funding: 2003 General Obligation Bonds Staff is seeking Council approval to re -fund general obligation bonds from 2003 (original amount of $12,050,000) that were issued for arterial street capital improvements, South Park Bridge transfer and the golf course clubhouse. Decreasing interest rates have made it more cost effective for the City to refinance/re -fund bonds such as these from 2003. Re- funding the remaining amount of the bonds will save the City approximately $337,000. There was brief discussion at the Committee of possibly paying off the bonds for the golf course, and only re- funding the arterial streets portion. Staff commented that regardless of the Council's decision, the golf course bonds cannot be paid off until December 1, 2013. However, re- funding could include options with callable bonds and other possibilities. Committee Members requested that Finance staff provide a table that identifies the options for what can be done with the bonds relative to the golf course and explain it in greater detail at the upcoming Budget Work Session on Tuesday, September 27, 2011. NO COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION. FORWARD TO SEPTEMBER 26 COW FOR DISCUSSION. C. Pavoff: Early Redemption of 1995 Revenue Bonds As information only, staff updated Committee on an item that was previously reviewed by Utilities Committee and is moving forward for Council discussion on September 26, 2011. Staff is seeking Council approval for an early redemption of Revenue Bonds originally issued for $4,500,000 from 1995. If approved, this early redemption will result in the payoff of the revenue bonds three years earlier than scheduled. The payoff face value is currently $1,370,000 and the early payoff will Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole Minutes September 26, 2011 Page 3 of 5 d. Non profit fee analysis for Revenue Generating Regulatory License (RGRL). Councilmember Hougardy indicated this item was discussed at the Finance and Safety Committee meeting on September 20, 2011. The committee members forwarded this item to the Committee of the Whole for discussion. Jennifer Ferrer, Senior Fiscal Coordinator, explained the Finance and Safety Committee members requested additional information from staff regarding revenue impacts from the Revenue Generating Regulatory License (RGRL) if the City removed the exemption status for non profit agencies with certain employee count thresholds. The Councilmembers asked clarifying questions of staff and exchanged comments to include: retaining the non profit exemption for businesses with fewer than 100 employees; having staff provide the Council with data on real -time impacts to the City to include methods to mitigate those impacts; recognizing that non profit organizations should be accountable for their share of infrastructure mitigation; ensuring the legislation is approved by the City Attorney; acknowledging that all businesses should be addressed uniformly regarding the RGRL fee; and including the definition of a non profit organization in the ordinance. Council President Ekberg asked staff to provide information to the Council on tax contributions the City receives from the top 2 non profit businesses within the City. Mayor Haggerton asked the Council to thoroughly review this issue and allow staff enough time to properly notify the businesses of a possible change. COUNCIL CONSENSUS EXISTED TO HAVE STAFF RETURN TO A FUTURE FINANCE AND SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING WITH A DRAFT ORDINANCE. e. An ordinance regarding refunding 2003 bonds. Councilmember Hougardy indicated this item was discussed at the Finance and Safety Committee meeting on September 20, 2011. The committee members were unanimous in recommending approval. Peggy McCarthy, Acting Finance Director, explained that in 2003, the City issued $12,050,000 of limited tax general obligation bonds to finance arterial street improvements and the construction of the golf course clubhouse. The proposed refunding would set aside sufficient funds from the refunding proceeds to pay off the bonds outstanding at December 1, 2013, the earliest call date. The City would realize a savings estimated at $354,651.95 or 4.878% of the refunded bonds with $281,442.17 realized from the arterial street fund portion of the bond issue and $136,209.78 realized from the golf course portion of the bond issue. The Councilmembers exchanged comments and asked clarifying questions of staff on the above topic. COUNCIL CONSENSUS EXISTED TO RETURN THIS ITEM TO A FUTURE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING. f. Early redemption of 1995 revenue bonds. Councilmember Hougardy indicated this item was discussed at the Finance and Safety Committee meeting on September 20, 2011. The committee members were unanimous in recommending approval. Ms. McCarthy stated the City issued $4,500,000 of revenue bonds to finance Water Fund -401 capital improvements in 1995. The outstanding balance of these bonds is $1,370,000 (face value) with the next mandatory bond redemption occurring February 1, 2012 and the last mandatory bond redemption occurring February 1, 2015. The City has an option to redeem these bonds for a savings of over $150,000.00. The Water Fund has $4 million in cash and investments to support the early pay -off. COUNCIL CONSENSUS EXISTED TO FORWARD THIS ITEM TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING. 70 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS CAS Nu,'\ttil ACI!ND.\ I1'I?\ITri'1,1? Initial. Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor's review 11/28/11 SK 1 11 /56 `V 12/05/11 SK ITEM INFORMATION STAFF SPONSOR: SHELLEY KERSLAKE Enactment of an ordinance prohibiting solic circumstances. ITEM NO. qunPil review 4.D. 01u(,INAI.A( DA'rl.: 11/28/11 itation in certain areas and under certain ®Dzrcu.rszon Motion Resolution Ordinance BidAzvard Public Hearin ❑Other llt Date 11/28/11 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 1215111 Mt Date Aftg Date t1ltg Date SPONSOR Council Mgj HR DCD E] Finance Fire IT P&R Police PIF SPONSOR'S This ordinance would address many complaints received by the City regarding soliciting/ panhandling in the urban center and along Tukwila International Boulevard. The ordinance restricts some solicitation activity while still leaving open some parts of the City for this activity. RI :\'tl:\'I?D lil CO \X %Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 11/14/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: SEAL RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. City Attorney /City Council COMn,rr1 -IT" Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EFI'I?NDnvizi? RI?OUllZI?D AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0 Fund Source: Connnents: MTG. DATE 11/28/11 1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS 11/28/11 Informational Memorandum dated 11/16/11 Draft Ordinance City of Tacoma Ordinance requested by the Community Affairs and Parks Committee Minutes from the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting of 11/14/11 71 72 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Committee of the Whole FROM: Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney DATE: November 16, 2011 (Updated after CAP meeting, changes underlined) SUBJECT: Anti Panhandling Ordinance ISSUE Whether the City should adopt an ordinance banning solicitation in certain areas of the City? BACKGROUND The City has received numerous complaints from citizens and businesses regarding serious public harm caused by panhandlers in the City. Many panhandlers within the City approach motor vehicles. As a result of this behavior, drivers may become distracted, may stop suddenly, or may linger at traffic control devices thereby posing a significant risk of physical injury to themselves, other motorists, and pedestrians. Moreover, because public places in the Urban Center and along Tukwila International Blvd. have become increasingly congested, solicitation in those public places contributes to the loss of access to and enjoyment of public places and to a sense of fear, intimidation and disorder. This fear can adversely and unreasonably affect businesses and can contribute to the loss of access to and enjoyment of public places. Another identified problem is panhandling near automated teller machines. Solicitation in these areas make those persons being solicited especially vulnerable to crime because of the isolated location, limited options to protect themselves by leaving the area, and exposure as persons who may be carrying cash. Similarly, solicitation at outdoor eating establishments can cause disruption and interfere with patrons' enjoyment of an eating establishment. Given these issues, the Mayor has asked the City Attorney's Office to draft an ordinance for Council's consideration to address these issues within the City. DISCUSSION The regulation of solicitation can impact an individual's right to free speech; thus, care should be taken when crafting such regulations. The First Amendment provides that "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech As a general matter, asking others to pay or contribute money is recognized as speech protected by the First Amendment.' Furthermore, a sidewalk, the place where much of panhandling activity occurs, is considered a public forum and is therefore associated with the permissible expressive activity. When dealing with traditional public forums, the First Amendment sharply curtails the government's ability to restrict expressive conduct. As a result, laws designed to prohibit all panhandling have been struck down as violating the First Amendment. Roulette v. ON of Seattle, 850 F.Supp. 1442, 1451 (WDWA, 1994). 2 Loper v. New York City Police Dept., 999 F.2d 699 (2" d Cir, 1993). 73 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 With that being said, the First Amendment does not guarantee the right to communicate one's views at all times and places or in any manner desired. A state or city may impose reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions upon all expression, whether written, oral or symbolized by conduct. Such restrictions are valid if they (1) are content neutral, (2) are narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest (under state law, the interest would have to be compelling), and (3) leave open ample alternative channels of communication. As a result, laws have been found to be constitutional when they focus on the context and method of the begging, especially on the level of threat that is perceived and the intent of the panhandler. Ideally, any response to panhandling will be tailored to local circumstances and each response justified by reliable analysis. When regulating panhandling, it should be remembered that it is difficult to distinguish panhandling from solicitations for recognized legitimate charities, both legally and factually. With this framework in mind, the ordinance was drafted to leave parts of the City open for solicitation activity. In addition, an exemption was included to account for the annual charitable solicitations that occur at the intersection of Andover Park West and Strander Blvd. In order for this exemption to withstand scrutiny, it must apply equally to all forms of solicitation. Manv other cities have similar ordinances and have effectivelv used them to deter panhandling in certain areas and under certain circumstances. For example, the Citv of Tacoma passed an anti- panhandling ordinance in 2006 (attached). Accordinq to Tacoma officials, the ordinance significantly curbed panhandling in the Citv's urban core and in four vears followinq enactment of the ordinance, only one arrest had been made. Thus, the experience in Tacoma was that the ordinance was not a drain on the justice system and was an effective tool for law enforcement to encourage those panhandling to move on. RECOMMENDATION The Council is being asked to consider the ordinance at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular Meeting. ATTACHMENTS -Draft Ordinance. Tacoma Ordinance requested by the Community Affairs and Parks Committee 3 The First Amendment provides that "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech Article 1, section 5 of the Washington Constitution provides that "[e]very person may freely speak, write and publish on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right." As yet, the courts have not enunciated a separate and independent State doctrine for analyzing restrictions under Washington's constitution. The free speech clauses of the state and federal constitutions are different in wording and effect. Despite this, restrictions on speech can be imposed consistent with Article 1, section 5 upon showing a compelling state or city interest. In most cases, the court's analysis of a manner restriction under federal law will usually lead to the same conclusion under our state constitution, and for the same reasons. WA2011 Info Memos- CoundhPanhandling Info Memo (2).doc 74 i AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING NEW REGULATIONS RELATED TO SOLICITING IN CERTAIN AREAS, TO BE CODIFIED IN TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 8.29; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that soliciting in certain places and circumstances has a detrimental effect on the creation of a safe environment in the City; and WHEREAS, there is an increase in solicitation in the City, specifically along Tukwila International Boulevard, in the Tukwila Urban Center, along on- and off -ramps and other public right -of -way, and at automated teller machines and outdoor patios that interfere with or potentially jeopardize the safety of citizens and pedestrians or vehicular traffic; and WHEREAS, the current provisions of the Tukwila Municipal Code do not regulate solicitation activity that involves safety concerns for people and vehicular traffic; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to regulate soliciting in certain areas and under certain circumstances to assist law enforcement officials in protecting the public health, welfare, and safety of citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes it is important to protect citizens from the fear and intimidation accompanying certain kinds of solicitation, to promote tourism and business, and to preserve the quality of urban life, while providing safe and appropriate venues for this constitutionally protected activity; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Regulations Established. Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 8.29, "Soliciting in Certain Areas Prohibited," is hereby established to read as follows: W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Soliciting prohibited in certain areas strike -thru 11 -16 -11 SK:bjs Page 1 of 4 75 CHAPTER 8.29 SOLICITING IN CERTAIN AREAS PROHIBITED Sections: 8.29.010 Purpose 8.29.020 Definitions 8.29.030 Soliciting prohibited 8.29.040 Exemption 8.29.050 Penalty for violation Section 2. TMC Section 8.29.010 is hereby established to read as follows: 8.29.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide for the free flow of pedestrian and vehicular traffic on streets and sidewalks in the City, to promote tourism and business, and to preserve the quality of urban life. Solicitation in proximity to automated teller machines and outdoor patios where food and beverage are served is inherently intimidating and should be restricted. By this legislation, the City Council intends to promote the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of and visitors to the City of Tukwila. Section 3. TMC Section 8.29.020 is hereby established to read as follows: 8.29.020 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this section: 1. "Automated teller machine" means a device linked to a financial institution's account records that is able to carry out transactions including, but not limited to, account transfers, deposits, cash withdrawals, balance inquiries, and mortgage and loan payments. 2. "Automated teller machine facility' means the area comprised of one or more automated teller machines, and any adjacent space that is made available to banking customers after regular banking hours. 3. "Prohibited zones" means the following areas (see Figure 1): a. Tukwila International Boulevard: 1) Northern Boundary: S. 139 St. on the east side of Tukwila International Boulevard and S. 140 St. on the west side of Tukwila International Boulevard. 2) Eastern Boundary: 42 nd Ave. S. from S. 139 St. to State Route W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Soliciting prohibited in certain areas strike -thru 11 -16 -11 SK:bjs Page 2 of 4 76 3) Southern Boundary: SR 518 from 42 Ave. S. to International Blvd. 4) Western Boundary: The western boundary of the Tukwila Link Light Rail (Tukwila International Boulevard) Station property continuing to the north along International Blvd. to S. 152 St., continuing to the west along S. 152 St. to Military Rd. S., continuing to the north along Military Rd. S. to 34 Ave. S., continuing to the north along 34 Ave. S. to S. 144 St., continuing to the east along S. 144 St. to 37 Ave. S., continuing to the north along 37 Ave. S. to S. 140 St., continuing to the east along S. 140 St. to Tukwila International Boulevard, and continuing to the north along Tukwila International Boulevard to S. 139 St. b. Tukwila Urban Center: The area bounded by Southcenter Blvd. on the north, West Valley Highway on the east, S. 180 St. and S. 178 St. on the south, and 1 -5 and Klickitat Dr. /51 Ave. S. on the west (including all on -ramps and off -ramps to 1 -5, 1 -405, and SR 518). 4. "Public right -of -way' means, without limitation, public streets, state routes and interstate highways (including, but not limited to on- and off ramps), sidewalks, alleys, and driveways. 5. "Solicit", "soliciting" and "solicitation" mean, without limitation, use of the spoken, written, or printed word, or to perform such other acts or bodily gestures, to further the purpose of immediately obtaining money or any other thing of value. Section 4. TMC Section 8.29.030 is hereby established to read as follows: 8.29.030 Soliciting prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to solicit: 1. From any occupant of a motor vehicle that is on a public right -of -way; 2. Within the prohibited zones; 3. Within 20 feet of an outdoor patio where food and /or drinks are served; or 4. Within 20 feet of an automated teller machine or an entrance or exit to an automated teller machine facility during the time the automated teller machine is available for customer use. Section 5. TMC Section 8.29.040 is hereby established to read as follows: 8.29.040 Exemption. It shall not be unlawful to engage in solicitation from any occupant of a motor vehicle that is on a public right -of -way at the intersection of Strander Blvd. and Andover Park West on the 3` Saturday in August and the 4 th Saturday in September. W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Soliciting prohibited in certain areas strike -thru 11 -16 -11 SK:bjs Page 3 of 4 77 Section 6. TMC Section 8.29.050 is hereby established to read as follows: 8.29.050 Penalty for violation. Violation of any terms of this chapter shall constitute a misdemeanor, and any person convicted of such offense shall be punished by a fine of up to $1,000 and /or imprisonment for a term not to exceed 180 days. Section 7. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering and section /subsection numbering. Section 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 9. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 1 2011. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk Jim Haggerton, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney Ordinance Number: Attachment: Figure 1, "No Panhandling" Areas W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Soliciting prohibited in certain areas strike -thru 11 -16 -11 SK:bjs Page 4 of 4 i FIGURE 1 S 137th St c/) S 139th St S 140th St LO cn 5141st t S 144th St S 152nd St S 15Oth St I- South,cent-e-r-Slyd �51 k [:-S 158th St a cn S 146th St S 142nd St C/) S '(56th S ac LO J :S 148th St U S 152nd St S 15Oth St I- South,cent-e-r-Slyd �51 k [:-S 158th St a 0 S 143rd St S 144th st S 149th St CL S 1 m cn 15 2nd P1 (P cn VI S 142nd St S '(56th S LO C U yila Pkwy cn LO -W I-- co LP LO 0 S 143rd St S 144th st S 149th St CL S 1 m cn 15 2nd P1 (P S 156th St 4 VI S '(56th S yila Pkwy &Lonq, UVL11 01 S 161st St ID ;0 Slade Wa s 164th St Strander Blvd m I IL Treck Dr via Wig Blvd 1-: (D Minkler Blvd Minkler Blvd City of Tukwila ilm im tic Upland Dr Midland "No Panhandling" tostco Dr Areas Triland Dr 414' Streets 1 S 180th St CL C* "No Panhandling" Areas dial" ti C ity Limits 79 :1 Req. #11299 ORDINANCE NO. 27600 BY REQUEST OF COUNCIL MEMBERS ANDERSON, LADENBURG, LONERGAN, AND TALBERT AN ORDINANCE relating to public safety and morals; amending the definition of pedestrian and vehicle interference, placing reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on solicitation of funds in certain locations, defining offenses and penalties; amending Section 8.13.030, "Vehicular or Pedestrian Interference," of the Tacoma Municipal Code; and amending Title 8 of the Tacoma Municipal Code by enacting two new chapters, Chapter 8.13A, "Regulation of Solicitation," and Chapter 8.13B, "Solicitations to Occupants of Vehicles on Public Roadways Prohibited." WHEREAS the City Council "Council has received numerous communications from citizens, businesses, community organizations, and others regarding serious public harms caused by panhandlers, and WHEREAS the Council's Public Safety and Human Services Committee has studied the matter for several months, and WHEREAS the Council held a public hearing on September 19, 2006, during which extensive testimony was taken, and WHEREAS, based on the testimony received and the information provided to it, the Council believes that it is important to protect citizens from the fear and intimidation accompanying certain kinds of solicitation, to promote tourism and business, and to preserve the quality of urban life while providing safe and appropriate venues for this constitutionally protected activity; Now, Therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TACOMA: Section 1. Based on the testimony provided to the City Council's "Council Public Safety and Human Services Committee and the Ord 11299.doc- SLGllad -1- i information and research provided to the Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk, the Council makes the following findings of fact: A. Persons using automated teller machines often do so in isolated locations with cash conspicuously in their possession; B. Persons using exterior public pay phones often do so in isolated locations with their attention distracted from their surroundings; C. Persons using self service car washes and gas stations often do so in isolated locations with cash conspicuously in their possession and are usually a captive audience, with their attention distracted from their surroundings while their vehicles are in various stages of cleaning or fueling; D, Persons using public transportation and waiting at public transportation stops are usually a captive audience, often in isolated locations, with their attention distracted from their surroundings as they wait and watch for necessary transportation; E. Persons entering or exiting vehicles are usually a captive audience, often in isolated locations, with their attention distracted from their surroundings as they load groceries or other purchases, look for keys, or watch for traffic; F. Persons entering and exiting buildings are usually a captive audience, with limited means of ingress and egress to those buildings; G. Persons conducting normal activities at night do so under conditions in which their visibility is reduced, and they often do these activities in isolated locations; o rd 11293. doc -S L Gllad -2- 0 H. Persons who are subjected to coercive solicitations are often solicited in circumstances where they are a captive audience or are in isolated locations; I. Motor vehicle drivers approached by pedestrians may become distracted, may stop suddenly, or may linger at traffic control devices thereby posing a significant risk of physical injury to themselves, other motorists, and pedestrians; J. "Public places," as defined in Chapter 8.13, serve the primary purpose of enabling pedestrian and vehicular traffic to safely and efficiently move about from place to place; and K. Solicitation on public property without permission of the property owner affects the rights of the property owner to control the use of his or her property. Section 2. Based on the findings above and the testimony and record provided, the Council concludes as follows: A. Solicitation of persons using automated teller machines, exterior public pay phones, self service car washes, and gas stations makes those persons especially vulnerable to crime because of the isolated locations, limited options to protect themselves by leaving the area, and exposure as persons who may be carrying cash; B. Solicitation of persons using or waiting for public transportation makes those persons more vulnerable to crime because of the isolated location of public transportation stops and because persons using or waiting for public transportation often cannot leave the area. This vulnerability may cause persons to avoid using public transportation; Ord11299.doc -S LGllad -3- i C. Solicitation of persons entering or exiting vehicles makes those persons more vulnerable to crime because those persons may be distracted from their surroundings or because they may be in an isolated location with limited options to avoid an attacker or thief; D. Solicitation of persons at night or of persons entering or exiting buildings makes those persons more vulnerable to crime because of the limited visibility and limited options to avoid an attacker or thief; E. Solicitation of persons operating motor vehicles may result in car /pedestrian collisions, as well as vehicle collisions caused when vehicles behind the one being solicited move forward without realizing the solicited driver has not moved; F. Because public places in the urban core have become increasingly congested, solicitation in those public places contributes to the loss of access to and enjoyment of public places and to a sense of fear, intimidation, and disorder. This fear adversely and unreasonably affects businesses and contributes to the loss of access to and enjoyment of public places; G. Coercive solicitation is disturbing and disruptive to residents and businesses and contributes to the loss of access to and enjoyment of public places and to a sense of fear, intimidation, and disorder; R Solicitations conducted on private property absent consent of the owner or occupant is akin to trespass and unreasonably interferes with the private enjoyment of property; Ord 11299.doc -SLG /lad -4- 1. Maintaining a distance of 15 feet between the solicitor and the person being solicited will help protect persons from such intimidating solicitations set forth above and will provide a uniform distance to guide law enforcement and citizens alike. Section 3. Section 8.13.030 of the Tacoma Municipal Code, entitled "Vehicular or Pedestrian Interference," is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and incorporated herewith. Section 4. Title 8 of the Tacoma Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition thereto of a new chapter, to be known and designated as Chapter 8.13A, entitled "Regulation of Solicitation," as shown in Exhibit "B," which is attached hereto and incorporated herewith. Section 5. Title 8 of the Tacoma Municipal Code is hereby amended by the addition thereto of a new chapter, to be known and designated as Chapter 8.1313, entitled "Solicitations to Occupants of Vehicles on Public Roadways Prohibited," as shown in Exhibit "C," which is attached hereto and incorporated herewith. Ord17299.doc- SLGAad -5- i Section 6. Severability. If any provision of this ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance or application of the provisions to other persons or circumstances shall be unaffected. Passed Attest: City Clerk Approved as to Form: Assistant City Attorney Ord 11299. d oc -S LG /lad Mayor i• EXHIBIT "A" 8.13.030 Vehicular or pedestrian interference. A. The following definitions apply in this section: 1. "AggFessively beg" means to beg with intent to intimidate anetheF per-son into 2. 31. "Obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic" means to walk, stand, sit, lie, or place an object in such a manner as to block passage by another person or a driver of a vehicle. or to cause another person or a driver of a vehicle to take evasive action to avoid physical contact. Acts authorized by a permit issued pursuant to the Tacoma Municipal Code, such as under Titles 9 and 10, shall not constitute obstruction of pedestrian or vehicular traffic. 4 2. "Public place" means an area generally visible to public view and includes alleys, bridges, buildings, driveways, parking lots, parks, plazas, sidewalks and streets open to the general public, including those that serve food or drink or provide entertainment, and the doorways and entrances to buildings or dwellings and the grounds enclosing them. B. A person is guilty of pedestrian interference if, in a public place, he or she intentionally: 4-.-9- obstructs pedestrian or vehicular traffic.-;-e 2 AggFessively Dens. C. Pedestrian interference may be punished by a fine not to exceed $1.000380.00 or by imprisonment in jail for a term not to exceed 90 days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Ord 11299.doc- SLG11ad -7- i EXHIBIT "B" CHAPTER 8.13A REGULATION OF SOLICITATION 8.13A.010 Purpose. 8.13A.020 Definitions. 8.13A.030 Place of solicitation. 8.13A.040 Solicitation by Coercion. 8.13A.050 Evidence. 8.13A.060 Penalties. 8.13A.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to protect citizens from the fear and intimidation accompanying certain kinds of solicitation, to promote tourism and business, and to preserve the quality of urban life while providing safe and appropriate venues for constitutionally protected activity. 8.13A.020 Definitions. In this chapter: A. "Automated teller machine" means a machine, other than a telephone: 1. that is capable of being operated by a customer of a financial institution; 2. by which the customer may communicate to the financial institution a request to withdraw, deposit, transfer funds, make payment, or otherwise conduct financial business for the customer or for another person directly from the customer's account or from the customer's account under a line of credit previously authorized by the financial institution for the customer; and 3. the use of which may or may not involve personnel of a financial institution. Ord 1129 9. d o c -S LGI I ad RU B. "Coercion" means: 1. to approach or speak to a person in such a manner as would cause a reasonable person to believe that the person is being threatened with either imminent bodily injury or the commission of a criminal act upon the person or another person or upon property in the person's immediate possession; 2 to persist in a solicitation after the person solicited has given a negative response; 3. to block, either individually or as part of a group of persons, the passage of a solicited person; 4. to engage in conduct that would reasonably be construed as intended to compel or force a solicited person to accede to demands; 5. to use violent or threatening gestures toward a person; 6. willfully providing or delivering, or attempting to provide or deliver, unrequested or unsolicited services or products with a demand or exertion of pressure for payment in return; or 7. to use profane, offensive, or abusive language, which is inherently likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction. C. "Exterior public pay telephone" means any coin or credit card reader telephone that is: 1. installed or located anywhere on a premises except exclusively in the interior of a building located on the premises; and 2. accessible and available for use by members of the general public. Ord 11299.doc -SLG /lad M M D. "Public transportation facility" means a facility or designated location that is owned, operated, or maintained by a city, county, county transportation authority, public transportation benefit area, regional transit authority, or metropolitan municipal corporation within the state. E. "Public transportation stop" means an area officially marked and designated as a place to wait for a bus, a light rail vehicle, or any other public transportation vehicle that is operated on a scheduled route with passengers paying fares on an individual basis. F. "Public transportation vehicle" has the meaning given that term in RCW 46.04.355, as currently adopted or as it may be amended in the future. G. "Self- service car wash" means a structure: 1. at which a vehicle may be manually washed by its owner or operator with equipment that is activated by the deposit of money in a coin- operated machine; and 2. that is accessible and available for use by members of the general public. H. "Self- service fuel pump" means a fuel pump: 1. from which a vehicle may be manually filled with gasoline or other fuel directly by its owner or operator, with or without the aid of an employee or attendant of the premises at which the fuel pump is located; and 2. that is accessible and available for use by members of the general public. Ord11299.doc- SLGAad -10- .I 1. "Solicit' and all derivative forms of "solicit" means to ask, beg, solicit, or plead, whether orally or in a written or printed manner, for the purpose of immediately receiving contributions, alms, charity, or gifts of items of value for oneself or another person. 8.13.030 Place of solicitation. A. Solicitation near designated locations and facilities. 1. It is unlawful for any person to solicit another person within 15 feet of: a. an automated teller machine; b. the entrance of a building, unless the solicitor has permission from the owner or occupant; c. an exterior public pay telephone; d. a self service car wash; e, a self- service fuel pump; f. a public transportation stop; or g. any parked vehicle as occupants of such vehicle enter or exit such vehicle. 2. It is unlawful for a person to solicit another person: a. on private property, unless the solicitor has permission from the owner or occupant; b. after sunset or before sunrise; c. in any public transportation facility or vehicle. Ord 11299.d oc -S LG/lad -11- 91 B. For purposes of subsection A, measurement will be made in a straight line, without regard to intervening structures or objects, from the nearest point at which a solicitation is being conducted to whichever is applicable of the following: 1. the nearest entrance or exit of a facility in which an automated teller machine is enclosed or, if the machine is not enclosed in a facility, to the nearest part of the automated teller machine; 2. the nearest entrance or exit of a building; 3. the nearest part of an exterior public pay telephone; 4. the nearest part of the structure of a self service car wash; 5. the nearest part of a self- service fuel pump; 6. the nearest point of any sign or marking designating an area as a public transportation stop; or 7. any door of a parked vehicle that is being used by an occupant of such vehicle to enter or exit such vehicle. 8.13A.040 Solicitation by Coercion. It is unlawful for a person to solicit by Coercion. 8.13A.050 Evidence. Evidence to support a conviction for a violation of this chapter may include, but is not limited to, testimony of witnesses, videotape evidence of the violation, and other admissible evidence. 8.13A.060 Penalties. Violation of Section 8.13A.030 shall be a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, a person is subject to a penalty of $1,000, incarceration for up to 90 days, or both a fine and a penalty. Violation of Ord 11299.doc- SLG /Iad -12- 92 Section 8.13A.040 shall be a gross misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, a person is subject to a penalty of $5,000, incarceration for up to one year, or both a fine and a penalty. Ord 11299.doc -SLG /lad -13- 93 EXHIBIT "C" CHAPTER 8.136 SOLICITATIONS TO OCCUPANTS OF VEHICLES ON PUBLIC ROADWAYS PROHIBITED 8.136.010 Purpose. 8.1313.020 Definitions. 8.136.030 Prohibited conduct. 8.1313.040 Evidence. 8.13B.050 Penalty. 8.1313.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to protect citizens from the fear and intimidation accompanying certain kinds of solicitation and to provide for vehicular and pedestrian traffic safety. 8.1313.020 Definitions. In this chapter: A. "Goods" means real property, as well as tangible and intangible personal property. B. "Public property" means: 1. any property open or devoted to public use or owned by the City; and 2. any area dedicated to the public use for sidewalk, street, highway, or other transportation purposes, including, but not limited to, any curb, median, parkway, shoulder, sidewalk, alley, drive, or public right -of -way. C. "Roadway" has the meaning given that term in RCW 46.04.500 as currently adopted or as it may be amended in the future. D. "Services" means any work done for the benefit of another person. E. "Solicit" and all derivative forms of "solicit' means any conduct or act whereby a person: Ord11299.doc- SLGAad -14- M 1. either orally or in writing, asks for an immediate ride, employment, goods, services, financial aid, monetary gifts, or any article representing monetary value, for any purpose; 2. either orally or in writing, sells or offers for immediate sale goods, services, or publications; 3. distributes without remuneration goods, services, or publications; or 4. solicits signatures on a petition or opinions for a survey. F. "Vehicle" has the meaning given that term in RCW 46.04.670, as currently adopted or as it may be amended in the future. 8.136.030 Prohibited conduct. A. It is unlawful for any person, while occupying any public property adjacent to any public roadway in the City, to knowingly conduct a solicitation directed to, or intended to attract the attention of, the occupant of any vehicle stopped or traveling on the roadway, unless said vehicle is legally parked. An offense occurs when the solicitation is made, whether or not an actual employment relationship is created, a transaction is completed, or an exchange of money, goods, or services takes place. PROVIDED, that nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit activity authorized pursuant to Tacoma Municipal Code Chapter 11. 15, Special Events Permitting Code. B. It is a defense to prosecution under Section 8.136.030 that the person was: 1. summoning aid or requesting assistance in an emergency situation; or Ord 11299.doc -S LG /lad -15- 95 2. a law enforcement officer in the performance of official duties. 8.1313.040 Evidence. Evidence to support a conviction for a violation of this chapter may include, but is not limited to, testimony of witnesses, videotape evidence of the violation, and other admissible evidence. 8.1313.050 Penalty. Violation of this chapter shall be a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, a person is subject to a penalty of $1,000, incarceration for up to 90 days, or both a fine and a penalty. Ord11299. doc -SLG /lad -16- M COMPARATIVE MUNICIPAL ORDINANCES CITY OF AGOURA HILLS, CALIFORNIA Article III Public Safety, Chapter 2, Traffic Section 3209. Prohibition of solicitation in public right -of -way. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person, while standing in any portion of the public right of -way, including but not limited to public streets, highways, sidewalks and driveways, to solicit, or attempt to solicit, employment, business or contributions of money or other property from any person travelling in a vehicle along a public right -of -way, including, but not limited to public streets, highways or driveways. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person, while the occupant of any vehicle, to solicit, or attempt to solicit, employment, business or contributions of money or other property from a person who is within the public right -of -way, including but not limited to a public street, highway, sidewalk or driveway. (Ord. No. 172, 2, 3- 27 -91; Ord, No. 191, 1, 7- 24 -91) CITY OF ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA ORDINANCE AMENDING ASHEVILLE CITY CODE SECTION 11 -5 REGULATING PUBLIC SOLICITATION AND BEGGING WHEREAS, the City of Asheville has authority pursuant to Article 8 of Chapter 160A of the North Carolina General Statutes to adopt ordinances to protect the heath, safety, or welfare of its citizens and peace and dignity of the City, and pursuant to N.C.G.S. 160A- 179, may by ordinance prohibit or regulate begging or otherwise canvassing the public for contributions for the private benefit of the solicitor or any other person; and WHEREAS, the City of Asheville has a significant governmental interest in keeping sidewalks and other pedestrian areas safe and free for use by pedestrians, especially areas of high pedestrian and vehicular traffic; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASHEVILLE THAT: Section 1. Chapter 11 of the Asheville City Code be amended as follows: a. By deleting Sec. 11 -5 and inserting the following in its place: "Sec. 11 -5. Public Solicitation and Begging Regulated. (a) Definitions. (1)Accosting: approaching or speaking to an individual or individuals in such a manner as would cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon his or her person, or upon property in his or her immediate possession. (2)Beg, solicit or panhandle: use of the spoken, written, or printed word, or other acts as are conducted in the furtherance of the purpose of immediately collecting contributions for the use of one's self or others. As used in this ordinance, the word, "solicit," and its forms, includes begging and panhandling. (3)Financial Institution: any bank, industrial bank, credit union, or savings and loan. (4)Forcing oneself upon the company of another a.Continuing to solicit in close proximity to the individual addressed after the person to whom the solicitation is directed has made a negative response, either verbally, by physical sign, by attempting to leave the presence of the person soliciting, or by other negative indication; b.Blocking the passage of the individual solicited; or c.Otherwise engaging in conduct that could reasonably be construed as intending to compel or force a person to accede to a solicitation. (b) Prohibited Acts. 97 (1) It shall be unlawful for any person to beg, solicit, or panhandle, as defined in Sec. (a)(2), above: a. by accosting another, or by forcing oneself upon the company of another; b. within 20 feet of the entrance to any financial institution, or any automatic teller machine; c at any outdoor dining area permitted pursuant to Sec. 16 -146, or outdoor merchandise area permitted pursuant to Sec. 16 -147, provided such areas are in active use at the time; d.at any transit stop or taxi stand, or in a public transit vehicle; e. while the person being solicited is standing in line waiting to be admitted to a commercial establishment; f. by touching the person being solicited without that person's consent; g. by blocking the path of a person being solicited or blocking the entrance or exit to any building or vehicle; h. by or with the use of profane or abusive language, during the solicitation or following an unsuccessful solicitation; i. by or with the use of any gesture or act intended to cause a reasonable person to be fearful of the solicitor or feel compelled to accede to the solicitation; j. after dark, which shall mean one -half hour after sunset until one -half hour before sunrise; k. while under the influence of alcohol or after having illegally used any controlled substance, as defined in the North Carolina Controlled Substance Act. (2) Additional restrictions applicable to high traffic zones: a. For purposes of this subsection (b)(2) only, the following definitions shall apply: 1. Beg, solicit or panhandle. The communication, by use of gestures or spoken words, by one person or group of persons directed at another person or group of persons, of a request for the immediate contribution of money, food or goods, to the person or group making the communication, or to others. This definition shall not include transactions between family members or mutual acquaintances. 2. High Traffic Zones. (a) Zone 1: Within the area defined by a line drawn along the centerline of the following streets: starting at the intersection of Hilliard Avenue and Market Street, west along Hilliard Avenue to the intersection of Hilliard Avenue and French Broad Avenue; then north along French Broad Avenue to the intersection of French Broad Avenue and Haywood Street; then east Haywood Street to the intersection of Haywood Street and Montford Avenue; then north along Montford Avenue to the intersection of Montford Avenue and Cherry Street; then east along Cherry Street to the intersection of Cherry Street and Broadway Street; then south on Broadway Street to the intersection of Broadway Street and Woodfin Street; then east on Woodfin Street to the intersection of Woodfin Street and College Street; then south on Valley Street to the intersection of Valley Street and Marjorie Street; then west along Marjorie Street to the intersection of Marjorie Street and Davidson Street; then south on Davidson Street to the intersection of Davidson Street and Eagle Street; then west along Eagle Street to the intersection of Eagle Street and Market Street; then south on Market Street to the point of beginning. (b) Zone 2: Within Biltmore Village Historic District. b. Prohibited Acts. In addition to the restrictions set forth in Sec. (b)(1), above, it shall be unlawful for any person to beg, solicit, or panhandle, as defined herein, within any high traffic zone. (c) Penalty. A violation of this ordinance is a misdemeanor as set forth in North Carolina General Statute Sec. 14-4." PA Section 2. That if any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared invalid. Section 3. That all ordinances and clauses of ordinances in conflict herewith be and are hereby repealed, to the extent of such conflict. Section 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect on the date of adoption. Read, approved and adopted this the 13"' day of May, 2003. CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 9.08.010 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE, RELATING TO AGGRESSIVE BEGGING WHEREAS, the current provisions of the Auburn City Code include regulation of activity that involves aggressive begging, such as intimidation, false or misleading activities or activities that involve safety concerns for people; and WHEREAS, because there is an increasing experience of activities at off ramps or along public rights -of -way that interfere with or potentially jeopardize the safety of pedestrians or vehicular traffic, it is appropriate that the provisions of the aggressive begging ordinance be modified to assure a better ability of the law enforcement officials to protect the safety that otherwise be threatened. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. New Section to Citv Code. That a new section 9.08.010 of the Auburn City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Chapter 9.08 AGGRESSIVE BEGGING Sections: 9.08.010 Aggressive begging. 9.08.010 Aggressive begging. A. It is unlawful for any person to engage in aggressive begging in any public place in the city, as those terms are defined by this section. B. As used in this section: 1. "Aggressive begging" shall mean: (a) begging with intent to intimidate another person into giving money or goods; (b) begging with use of false, misleading information; (c) begging with or involving activities that are unsafe or dangerous to any person or property, or begging at locations or in a manner that threatens the safety of persons or property, or that impedes or threatens to impede pedestrian or vehicular traffic; (d) begging in a manner that exploits children; or (e) willfully providing or delivering, or attempting to provide or deliver, unrequested or unsolicited services or products with a demand or exertion of pressure for payment in return. 2. "Begging" shall mean asking for money or goods as a charity, whether by words, bodily gestures, signs or other means. 3. "To intimidate" shall mean to coerce or frighten into submission or obedience, or to engage in conduct which would make a reasonable person fearful or feel compelled. 4. "Public place" shall mean: (a) any public road, alley, lane, parking area, sidewalk, or other publicly owned building, facility or structure; (b) any public playground, school ground, recreation ground, park, parkway, park drive, park path or rights -of -way open to the use of the public; or (c) any privately owned property adapted to and fitted for vehicular or pedestrian travel that is in common use by the public with the consent, expressed or implied, of the owner or owners. 5. "Exploit" shat! mean using in an unethical, selfish or abusive manner or in any other manner that gives an unfair advantage. C. Violation of this section shall be a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine up to $1,000 or by a jail sentence of up to 90 days, or by both such fine and jail time. (Ord. 591$ 1, 2005; Ord. 56$2 1, 2002.) Section 2. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, the remainder of such code, ordinance or regulation or the application thereof to other person or circumstance shall not be affected. CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO Sec. 134 -360. Solicitation on or near street or highway. (a) The purpose of this section is to prevent dangers to persons and property, to prevent delays, and to avoid interference with the traffic flow. Roadways that have center medians often are designed to deal with specific traffic flow problems. Any delay or distraction may interfere with traffic planning. Sometimes persons stand near intersections and near traffic lights to contact drivers or passengers in cars that are passing or that are stopped temporarily due to traffic lights. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to solicit employment, business, contributions, or sales of any kind or collect monies for such from the occupant of any vehicle traveling upon any street or highway when: (1) Such solicitation or collection causes the person performing the activity to enter onto the traveled portion of a street or highway. (2) Such solicitation or collection involves the person performing the activity to be located upon any median area which separates traffic lanes for vehicular travel in opposite directions. (3) The person performing the activity is located such that vehicles cannot move into a legal parking area to safely conduct the transaction. (c) It shall be unlawful for any person to solicit or attempt to solicit employment, business, or contributions of any kind from the occupant of any vehicle on any highway included in the interstate system, including any entrance to or exit from such highway. (d) For purposes of this section, the traveled portion of the street or highway shall mean that portion of the road normally used by moving motor vehicle traffic. (Code 1979, 37 -124) CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS 9-4 -13 SOLICITATION PROHIBITED. (A) The council finds that: (1) Aggressive solicitation is disturbing and disruptive to residents and businesses and contributes to the loss of access to and enjoyment of public places and to a sense of fear, intimidation and disorder. (2) Aggressive solicitation includes approaching or following pedestrians, repetitive soliciting despite refusals, the use of abusive or profane language to cause fear and intimidation, unwanted physical contact, or the intentional blocking of pedestrian and vehicular traffic. (3) The presence of individuals who solicit money from persons at or near banks, automated teller machines, public transportation facilities, and crosswalks is 4 ms especially troublesome because of the enhanced fear of crime in a place that is confined, difficult to avoid, or where a person might find it necessary to wait. (4) This section is intended to protect citizens from the fear and intimidation accompanying certain kinds of solicitation, and not to limit a constitutionally protected activity. (B) In this section: (1) AGGRESSIVE MANNER means: (a) intentionally or recklessly making any physical contact with or touching another person in the course of the solicitation without the person's consent; (b) following the person being solicited, if that conduct is: (i) intended to or likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon property in the person's possession; or (ii) intended to or reasonably likely to intimidate the person being solicited into responding affirmatively to the solicitation; (c) continuing to solicit a person within five feet of the person being solicited after the person has made a negative response; (d) intentionally or recklessly blocking the safe or free passage of the person being solicited or requiring the person, or the driver of a vehicle, to take evasive action to avoid physical contact with the person making the solicitation; (e) using obscene or abusive language or gestures toward the person being solicited; (f) approaching the person being solicited in a manner that: (i) is intended to or is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon property in the person's possession; or (ii) is intended to or is reasonably likely to intimidate the person being solicited into responding affirmatively to the solicitation. (2) AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE means a device, linked to a bank's account records, which is able to carry out banking transactions. (3) AUTOMATED TELLER FACILITY means the area comprised of one or more automatic teller machines, and any adjacent space that is made available to banking customers. (4) BANK includes a bank, savings bank, savings and loan association, credit union, trust company, or similar financial institution. (5) BUS means a vehicle operated by a transit authority for public transportation. (6) CHECK CASHING BUSINESS means a person in the business of cashing checks, drafts, or money orders for consideration. (7) PUBLIC AREA means an outdoor area to which the public has access and includes, but is not limited to, a sidewalk, street, highway, park, parking lot, alleyway, pedestrian way, or the common area of a school, hospital, apartment house, office building, transport facility, or shop. (8) SOLICIT means to request, by the spoken, written, or printed word, or by other means of communication an immediate donation or transfer of money or another thing of value from another person, regardless of the solicitor's purpose or intended use of the money or other thing of value, and regardless of whether consideration is offered. (C) A person commits an offense if the person solicits: (1) in an aggressive manner in a public area; (2) in a bus, at a bus station or stop, or at a facility operated by a transportation authority for passengers; o 101 (3) within 25 feet of (a) an automated teller facility; (b) the entrance or exit of a bank; or (c) the entrance or exit of a check cashing business; or (4) at a marked crosswalk. (5) on either side of the street on a block where a school attended by minors or a child -care facility has an entrance or exit; (6) at a sidewalk caft& authorized under Chapter 14 -4 (Sidewalk Cafes) or the patio area of a bar or restaurant; or (7) in the downtown business area described in Section 9 -4 -14 (Sitting or Lying Down on Public Sidewalks in the Downtown Business Area Prohibited) between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. (D) A culpable mental state is not required, and need not be proved, for an offense under Subsection (C)(2), (3), or (4). (E) This section is not intended to proscribe a demand for payment for services rendered or goods delivered. 12 -1 -27 SOLICITATIONS BETWEEN AN OCCUPANT OF A MOTOR VEHICLE AND A PEDESTRIAN. (A) This section applies in the following areas, including the streets and pedestrian rights -of -way that bound the areas (B) The council finds that the distraction of motorists occasioned by a solicitation between an occupant of a motor vehicle and a pedestrian impedes the safe and orderly flow of traffic, causes vehicles to stop unexpectedly, causes vehicles to linger at traffic control devices, and causes motorists to fail to attend to driving. Distracted drivers pose a significant risk of physical injury to motorists and pedestrians. (C) In this section "private parking area" means privately owned property for vehicle parking, and an adjacent driveway, walkway, setback, and landscaped area. (D) A person who is in or next to a street, on a sidewalk, or in a private parking area commits an offense if the person solicits, or attempts to solicit, services, employment, business, or contributions from an occupant of a motor vehicle. (E) A person in a motor vehicle commits an offense if the person solicits, or attempts to solicit, services, employment, business, or contributions from a person who is in or next to a street, on a sidewalk, or in a private parking area. (F) This section does not apply to: (1) a facility operated by or for the City, and designated by the city manager as a place where the solicitation of employment or services is permitted; or (2) a private parking area unless the owner of the parking area has permanently posted a conspicuous sign at each entrance of the parking area, in both English and Spanish, stating that it is a misdemeanor to engage in solicitation for employment. (G) An offense under this section is punishable by a fine not to exceed $500. [9 -4 -3: Except as otherwise specifically provided, a person who violates this chapter commits a Class C misdemeanor...]. CITY OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 47 -1. Definitions. (a) Aggressive soliciting. "Aggressive soliciting" means soliciting which is accompanied by 1 or more of the following: (1) approaching, speaking to, or following a person in such a manner as would cause a Z 102 reasonable person to fear bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon the person or upon property in the person's immediate possession; (2) in the course of soliciting, touching another person without that person's consent; (3) continuously soliciting from a person or following the person after the person has made a negative response; (4) intentionally blocking or interfering with the safe passage of a person or a vehicle by any means, including unreasonably causing a person to take evasive action to avoid physical contact; (5) using obscene or abusive language either during the course of soliciting or following a refusal; or (6) acting with the intent of intimidating another person into giving money or another thing of value. (b) Place open to the general public. "Place open to the general public" means sidewalks, streets, alleys, driveways, parking lots and garages, parks, plazas, buildings, doorways and entrances to buildings, the grounds enclosing buildings, or the mall and/or adjacent parking areas of any shopping center to which the general public is invited for business purposes. (c) Soliciting. (1) "Soliciting" means any act by which 1 person requests an immediate donation of money or other thing of value from another or others in person, regardless of the solicitor's purpose or intended use of the money or other thing of value. (2) The solicitation may be oral, written, or by other means of communication. (City Code, 1976183, art. 19, §249(b).) (Ord. 93 -275, Orel. 94 -447.) 47 -2. Findings and declarations. The Mayor and City Council: (1) finds and declares that aggressive soliciting and soliciting in certain places and circumstances have a detrimental effect on the creation of a safe environment in the City of Baltimore; and (2) finds that restricting certain acts, without prohibiting soliciting, is a necessary exercise of the police, health, and welfare power in order to maintain the peace and good government of Baltimore City and to preserve and protect the rights of all citizens. (City Code, 1976183, art. 19, §249(a).) (Ord. 93 -275, Ord. 94 -447, Ord. 04 -672.) 47 -3. Aggressive soliciting in public places prohibited. It is unlawful for any person to engage in aggressive soliciting in any place open to the general public. (City Code, 1976183, art. 19, §249(c).) (Ord. 93 -275, Ord. 94 -447.) 47 -4. Soliciting in certain ways and places prohibited. It is unlawful for any person to engage in soliciting: (1) within 10 feet of any automatic teller machine (ATM); (2) in any public transportation vehicle or at any bus, train, light rail, or subway station or stop; (3) on private property or residential property, if the owner, tenant, or occupant has asked the person not to solicit on the property or has posted a sign on the property indicating no soliciting; (4) from any operator or occupant of a motor vehicle that is in traffic on a public street, whether in exchange for cleaning the vehicle's windows or otherwise; or (5) from any operator or occupant of a motor vehicle on a public street in exchange for blocking, occupying, or reserving a public parking space or directing the occupant to a public parking space. (City Code, 1976183, art. 19, §249(e).) (Ord. 93 -275,• Ord 94 -447.) 103 47 -5. Nighttime soliciting prohibited. (a) In general. Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, no person may engage in soliciting between sunset and sunrise. (b) Exception. This section does not apply to soliciting that is done solely: (i) by passively standing or sitting with a sign or other indication that one is seeking donations; and (ii) without addressing any oral or other solicitation to any specific person other than in response to an inquiry by that person. (c) Enforcement by Civil Citation. (1) This section may be enforced by issuance of a civil citation under City Code Article 1, Subtitle 41 "Civil Citations (2) A citation may be issued under this section only by a police officer. (3) No person may be imprisoned for a violation of this section, for failing to pay a fine imposed under this section, or for failing to appear in court. (Ond. 04 -675.) 47 -6. {Reserved) 47 -7. Other soliciting permitted. "Soliciting" as defined in 47 -1(c) of this subtitle is lawful except only as specified in this subtitle. (City Code, 1976183, art. 19, §249(d).) (Ord. 93 -275; Ord, 94 -447; Ord. 04 -675.) 47 -8. (Reserved) 47 -9. Penalties. (a) In general. Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, any person who violates a provision of this subtitle is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof: (1) shall be fined not more than $100 or imprisoned for not more than 30 days, or both; or (2) if the person has been convicted of a violation of this subtitle within the previous year, the person shall be fined not more than $250 or imprisoned for not more than 90 days, or both. (b) Exception. This section does not apply to any violation of 47 -5 ["Nighttime soliciting prohibited of this subtitle. CITY OF BOSTON, (MASSACHUSETTS 16 -11.1 Definitions. For purposes of this section: a. Solicit shall mean to request an immediate donation of money or other thing of value from another person, regardless of the solicitor's purpose or intended use of the money or other value. The solicitation may be, without limitation, by the spoken, written, or printed word, bodily gestures, signs, or by other means of communication. b. Aggressive manner shall mean: 1. Any conduct that is (i) intended to or is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon property in that person's immediate possession; or (ii) intended to or is likely to cause a reasonable person to be intimidated into responding affirmatively to the solicitation; or 2. Persisting in closely following or approaching a person, after the person solicited has been solicited and informed the solicitor by words or conduct that such 104 person does not want to be solicited or does not want to give money or any other thing of value to the solicitor; or 3. Intentionally or recklessly blocking or interfering with the safe or free passage of the person being solicited, whether the person is a pedestrian or the operator of a vehicle, including the situation where the person takes evasive action to avoid physical contact with the person making the solicitation; or 4. Intentionally touching or making any physical contact with the person being solicited in the course of the solicitation without the person's consent. c. Automated teller machine shall mean a device, linked to a financial institution's account records, which is able to carry out transactions, including, but not limited to: account transfers, deposits, cash withdrawals, balance inquiries, and mortgage and loan payments. d. Automated teller machine facility shall mean the area comprised of one or more automatic teller machines, and any adjacent space which is made available to banking customers during and after regular banking hours. e. Bank shall mean the same as the defined G. L. c. 167, s. I. f. Check cashing business shall mean the same as that defined by G.L. 167, c. 169A, s. 1. g. Public area shall mean an area to which the public has access and includes, but is not limited to, alleys, bridges, buildings, driveways, parking lots, parks, playgrounds, plazas, sidewalks, and streets open to the general public, and the doorways and entrances to buildings, and dwellings. (Ord. 1997 c. 10) 16 -41.2 Prohibited Acts. It shall be unlawful for any individual to solicit money or other things of value, even if validly licensed by the City of Boston for such act, if such solicitation is conducted: a. In an aggressive manner in a public area, including the situation where the individual being solicited in an aggressive manner is the operator or occupant of a motor vehicle located on a public way and the solicitation consists of performing or offering to perform a service in connection with such vehicle; or b. Within ten (10) feet of any entrance or exit of any bank or check cashing business during the hours of operation of such bank or check cashing business or within ten (10') feet of any automated teller machine during the hours of its operation. (Ord. 1997 c. 10) 16 -41.3 Penalties. Any individual who violates subsection 16 -37.2 of this section shall be subject to a fine of fifty ($50.00) dollars for the first offense and one hundred ($100.00) dollars for any subsequent offense, or, that the Court may impose such community service as it shall determine in lieu of a monetary fine. (Ord. 1997 c. 10) CITY OF CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA Sec. 11 -170. Begging, panhandling, or soliciting contributions. (a) Definitions: (1) To beg, panhandle, or solicit contrlbutions shall be defined to include, without limitation, the spoken, written, or printed word or such other acts as are conducted in furtherance of the purpose of obtaining contributions; (2) Accosting another person shall be defined as approaching or speaking to someone in such a manner as would cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act or damage to property in his immediate possession; 0 105 (3) Intimidate another person shall be defined as acting in such a way as would cause a reasonable person to fear bodily harm and therefore to do something he or she would not otherwise have done; (4) Forcing oneself upon the company of another person shall be defined as: (i)Continuing to request or solicit contributions in close proximity to the person addressed after that person has responded negatively; (ii)Blocking the passage of the person addressed; or (iii)Otherwise engaging in conduct which reasonably could be understood as intended to force a person to accede to demands. (5) Public place shall be defined to include streets, highways, and roadways (including the shoulders and medians), sidewalks, alleys, and other public property, as well as town -owned and town controlled property and private property open to the public unless permission to solicit has been obtained from the town or from the property owner or other person in authority. (6) Vocal anneal shall be defined as beaaina, panhandlina. or solicitation of contributions by spoken word or other verbal reauest. This shall not include the act of performina music with a sign or other indication that a contribution is being sought, without anv vocal reauest other than in response to an inauirv. (7) Direct written anneal shall be defined as beaaina. oanhandlina. or solicitation bv. handina to a person or attemotina to hand to a person a written solicitation for immediate contributions. (8) Niahttime shall be defined as the time from dusk to dawn., (b) No person shall beg, panhandle, or solicit contributions in a public place in a manner so as to intimidate another person or by accosting another person, or by forcing oneself upon the company of another person. (c) No person shall beg, panhandle, or solicit contributions from another person within twenty (20) feet of an entrance or exit of any bank or financial institution or within twenty (20) feet of any automated teller machine. (d) No person shall beg, panhandle, or solicit contributions in any public transportation vehicle owned or operated by the Town of Chapel Hill or at any station for such vehicle or within six (6) feet of a bus stop sign, bus stop shelter, or bus stop bench. (e) No person shall beg, panhandle, or solicit contributions while sitting or standing on a roadway or the shoulder or median of a roadway. M No person shall bea. panhandle. or solicit contributions in a public place by vocal appeal or direct written aopeal durina niahttime. (4 LgJ Violation of this section shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall subject the violator to a fine of not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) or imprisonment for not more than seven (7) days. CITY OF CINCINNATI Sec. 910 -12. Improper Solicitation. (a) Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following terms shall be defined as set forth below: (1) "Solicit" and "Solicitation" mean to make any request in person while in a public place, for an immediate grant of money, goods or any other form of gratuity from another person(s), or to engage in such activity on private property. However, the terms "solicit' and "solicitation" shall not mean the act of passively standing or sitting with a sign or other indicator that a donation of money, goods or any other form of gratuity is being sought without any vocal request other than a response to an inquiry by another person. 10 106 (2) "Public place" means a publicly owned building and premises appurtenant thereto, any public park, sidewalk or other right of way open to the general public and includes alleys, bridges, buildings, driveways, parking lots, parks, plazas, skywalks and streets. (b) It is unlawful for any person to solicit in the following places: (1) In any public transportation vehicle or at any bus stop; (2) Within 20 feet in any direction from an automatic teller machine or entrance to a bank; (3) From any operator or occupant of a motor vehicle or from any person entering or exiting a motor vehicle; (4) Within 20 feet of any crosswalk; (5) From a person standing in line waiting to be admitted to a commercial establishment; or (6) On private property without permission from the owner. (c) It is unlawful for any person to solicit after sunset or before sunrise. The times of sunset and of sunrise shall be as published by the United States Naval Observatory. (d) It is unlawful for any person to solicit in an aggressive manner, including any of the following actions: (1) Soliciting in a manner that impedes access to or from, or use of a building, vehicle or establishment; (2) Soliciting in a manner that would alarm, intimidate, threaten, menace, harass, or coerce a reasonable person; (3) By following behind, ahead or alongside, blocking the path of, or continuing to solicit a person who walks or drives away from the person soliciting or who gives notice or demonstrates verbally or physically that such solicitation is offensive, unwelcome or that the solicitation should cease; (4) By using profane or abusive language or gestures either during the solicitation or following a refusal, or making any statement, gesture or other communication that would cause a reasonable person to be fearful or would be perceived as a threat; or (5) By touching the solicited person without a statement, gesture or other communication that the person being solicited consents to the touching. (e) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly make a false or misleading representation in the course of soliciting a donation. False or misleading representations include, but are not limited to the following: (1) Stating that the donation is needed to meet a specific need, when the person soliciting already has sufficient funds to meet that need and does not disclose that fact; (2) Stating that the donation is needed to meet a need that does not exist; (3) Stating that the person soliciting is from out of town and stranded, or that he or she is homeless when that is not true; (4) Stating or representing that the person soliciting is a member of a military service when the person soliciting is neither a present nor a former member of a military service; (5) Stating or representing that the person soliciting suffers from a mental or physical disability or deformity when the person soliciting does not suffer the disability or deformity indicated; or (f) It is unlawful for any person to solicit without possession of a valid registration issued by the police department. Any person who has been registered shall keep a copy of the registration on his or her person at all times while engaging in acts of solicitation and shall show it to any police officer upon request. No person whose registration has been revoked shall engage in acts of solicitation within the City of Cincinnati for a period of eighteen (18) months following the revocation. The police chief or his designee shall issue the registration, without fee, to any eligible person who presents himself or herself at the registration location to be designated and 107 operated by the health department, states his or her true name, presents a photo identification or signs a declaration under penalty of perjury that he or she has no such identification, and permits himself or herself to be photographed. The regular registration shall expire one (1) year from the date of issuance. Upon receipt of an application for registration that is in accordance with this section, the police department shall issue a temporary registration valid for ten (10) days and shall determine eligibility for a regular registration before the temporary registration expires. An eligible applicant shall receive a regular registration upon determination of the applicant's eligibility. If such determination is not made within the ten -day period, the temporary registration shall remain in effect until such time that the determination is made. The regular registration shall be sent by U.S. mail to the address as provided by the applicant, or pursuant to procedures as established by the police department. Along with the regular registration, the police department shall provide the applicant with a copy of this section. No person shall make a false or misleading representation while applying for registration under this section. First time offenders of the registration requirement will be issued a warning citation by the issuing officer, which will be recorded at the police department, but such first -time offenders will not be charged with a violation of this section. Subsequent violations of the registration requirement will result in a charge of violation of this section. (g) A person is ineligible to register if, and only if, within the past eighteen (18) months, he or she has (1) been previously convicted of a violation of Section 910 -12 of the Cincinnati Municipal Code; or (2) has had a registration revoked pursuant to section (h) of this ordinance; or (3) has been convicted of an offense under the laws of any jurisdiction which involve aggressive or intimidating behavior while engaging in solicitation or false or misleading representations while engaging in solicitation. (h) The police chief or his designee shall revoke any registration issued under this section to a person who has been convicted of a violation of Section 910 -12 of the Cincinnati Municipal Code within the past eighteen (18) months. Upon any arrest for any violation of this section, the arrested person shall release to the arresting officer any registration issued under this section to the arrested person. The arrested person may apply at the registration location designated and operated by the health department for consecutive thirty -day temporary registrations pending adjudication of the arrest case. Such temporary registrations shall be issued to the arrested person during pendency of the arrest case under this section. (i) Any applicant shall have the right to appeal the denial or revocation of registration by immediately requesting review by the Office of Administrative Hearings of the City of Cincinnati. The appeal to the Office of Administrative Hearings shall be taken by the applicant or registration holder within ten (10) days after issuance of the notice of denial or revocation by filing written notice of appeal with the police chief at the 310 Ezzard Charles Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, which shall be immediately provided to the Office of Administrative Hearings. The Office of Administrative Hearings shall consider the appeal within a reasonable time period as set forth within its regulations. The Office of Administrative Hearings shall direct that the denial or revocation be rescinded if the applicant has met all of the qualifying criteria set forth in this section. The applicant or registration holder may appeal the decision of the Office of Administrative Hearings to the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County pursuant to Chapter 2505 of the Ohio Revised Code. 0) Each section and each part of each section of this ordinance is hereby declared to be an independent section and part of a section and, notwithstanding any other evidence 12 W •11 of legislative intent, that if any section or part of a section, or any provision thereof, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, is held to be invalid, the remaining sections or parts of sections and the application of such provision to any other person or circumstances, other than those to whom it is held invalid, shall be affected thereby, and it is hereby declared to be the legislative intent that the provisions of this ordinance would have been adopted independently of such section, sections or parts of a section so held invalid. (k) Whoever violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. (Ord. 156 -1995, eff. June 2, 1995; a. Ord. No. 368 -1995, eff. Nov. 8, 1995; a. Ord. No. 140 -1999, eff. May 21, 1999; a. Ord. No. 68 -2002, eff. April 5, 2002; a. Ord. No. 158- 2003, 2, eff. June 20, 2003; Emer. Ord. No. 140 -2005, 1, eff. May 10, 2006) Sec. 910 -13. Interference With Pedestrian or Vehicular Traffic. No person shall recklessly interfere with pedestrian or vehicular traffic in a public place. "interfere with pedestrian or vehicular traffic" as used in this section means to walk, stand, sit, lie, or grab, touch or approach another person, in a public place so as to block, interfere with, or impede the passage of any person or any vehicle, or to cause any person or any driver of any vehicle to alter his or her intended direction of travel. "Public place" as used in this section includes street, sidewalks, parks, plazas, parking lots, driveways, public or private buildings open to the public, and doorways and entrances to buildings or dwellings. Whoever violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree. (Ordained by Ord. No. 230 -1992, eff. May 20, 1992; a. Ord. No. 68 -2002, eff. April 5, 2002) CITY OF CLEVELAND, OHIO 471.06 Use of Highway for Soliciting; (a) No person while on a roadway outside a safety zone shall solicit a ride from the driver of any vehicle. This division does not apply in the case of emergency or when the solicitation is due to the person engaging transportation for hire. (b) No person shall stand on a highway for the purpose of soliciting employment, business, or contributions from the occupant of any vehicle. This division does not apply to police or firefighters soliciting contributions for bona fide charities. (c) No person shall stand on a street or highway, or on any other portion of the right -of- way, including the berm, shoulder, treelawn, and sidewalk, and transfer or receive any item, object, package, currency, or anything of value, to or from the driver or an occupant of any vehicle. This division shall not apply in the case of emergency, or when the transfer or exchange of the item, object, package, currency, or thing of value is due to the person engaging transportation for hire or making a purchase from a licensed vendor. This division does not apply in the case of emergency; or when the transfer or exchange of the item object, package, currency, or thing of value is due to the person engaging transportation for hire by a public hack; or is due to the person facilitating a funeral escort vehicle; or is due to the person making a purchase from a licensed vendor; or is due to police or firefighters soliciting contributions for bona fide charities; or is due to a charitable entity soliciting for bona fide charitable purposes. (d) No person who is the driver or occupant of a vehicle shall transfer or receive any item, object, package, currency, or anything of value, to or from any person standing on a street or highway, or on any other portion of the right -of -way, including the berm, shoulder, treelawn, and sidewalk. This division shall not apply in the case of emergency, or when the transfer or exchange of the item, object, package, currency, or thing of value is due to the person engaging 13 109 transportation for hire or making a purchase from a licensed vendor. This division does not apply in the case of emergency; or when the transfer or exchange of the item, object, package, currency, or thing of value is due to the person engaging transportation for hire by a public hack; or is due to the person facilitating a funeral escort vehicle; or is due to the person making a purchase from a licensed vendor; or is due to police or firefighters soliciting contributions for bona fide charities; or is due to a charitable entity soliciting for bona fide charitable purposes. (e) No person shall stand on a street or highway, or on any other portion of the right -of- way, including the berm, treelawn, shoulder, and sidewalk, and repeatedly stop, beckon to, or attempt to stop vehicular traffic by hailing, waving arms, or making other bodily gestures. This division shall not be construed to prohibit a person from stopping, beckoning to, or attempting to stop vehicles due to emergency, or to warn drivers of danger, or to engage transportation or hire. (1) Whoever violates divisions (b), (c), (d) or (e) of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor of the fourth degree on the first offense, a misdemeanor of the third degree on the second offense, and a misdemeanor of the first degree on the third and each subsequent offense. Whoever violates any other division of this section is guilty of a minor misdemeanor on the first offense; a misdemeanor of the fourth degree on a second offense; and a misdemeanor of.the third degree on the third and each subsequent offense. (RC 4511.51; Ord. No. 1534 -02. Passed 11- 11 -02, eff. 11- 19 -02) CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS SEC. 31 -35. SOLICITATION BY COERCION; SOLICITATION NEAR DESIGNATED LOCATIONS AND FACILITIES. (a) In this section: (1) AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE means a machine, other than a telephone: (A) that is capable of being operated by a customer of a financial institution; (B) by which the customer may communicate to the financial institution a request to withdraw a benefit for the customer or for another person directly from the customer's account or from the customer's account under a line of credit previously authorized by the financial institution for the customer; and (C) the use of which may or may not involve personnel of a financial institution. (2) COERCION means: (A) to approach or speak to a person in such a manner as would cause a reasonable person to believe that the person is being threatened with: (i) imminent bodily injury; or (ii) the commission of a criminal act upon the person or another person, or upon property in the person's immediate possession; (B) to persist in a solicitation after the person solicited has given a negative response; (C) to block, either individually or as part of a group of persons, the passage of a solicited person; or (D) to engage in conduct that would reasonably be construed as intended to compel or force a solicited person to accede to demands. (3) EXTERIOR PUBLIC PAY TELEPHONE means any coin or credit card reader telephone that is: 14 HHEI (A) installed or located anywhere on a premises except exclusively in the interior of a building located on the premises; and (B) accessible and available for use by members of the general public. (4) PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STOP means an area officially marked and designated as a place to wait for a bus, a light rail vehicle, or any other public transportation vehicle that is operated on a scheduled route with passengers paying fares on an individual basis. (5) SELF- SERVICE CAR WASH means a structure: (A) at which a vehicle may be manually washed by its owner or operator with equipment that is activated by the deposit of money in a coin operated machine; and (B) that is accessible and available for use by members of the general public. (6) SELF- SERVICE FUEL PUMP means a fuel pump: (A) from which a vehicle may be manually filled with gasoline or other fuel directly by its owner or operator, without the aid of an employee or attendant of the premises at which the fuel pump is located; and (B) that is accessible and available for use by members of the general public. (7) SOLICITATION means to ask, beg, solicit, or plead, whether orally or in a written or printed manner, for the purpose of receiving contributions, alms, charity, or gifts of items of value for oneself or another person. (b) A person commits an offense if he conducts a solicitation by coercion. (c) A person commits an offense if he conducts any solicitation within 25 feet of: (1) an automated teller machine; (2) an entrance or exit of a bank, credit union, or other similar financial institution; (3) an exterior public pay telephone; (4) a self service car wash; (5) a self service fuel pump; or (6) a public transportation stop. (d) For purposes of Subsection (c), measurement will be made in a straight line, without regard to intervening structures or objects, from the nearest point at which a solicitation is being conducted to whichever is applicable of the following: (1) the nearest entrance or exit of a facility in which an automated teller machine is enclosed or, if the machine is not enclosed in a facility, to the nearest part of the automated teller machine; (2) the nearest entrance or exit of a bank, credit union, or other similar financial institution; (3) the nearest part of an exterior public pay telephone; (4) the nearest part of the structure of a self service car wash; (5) the nearest part of a self service fuel pump; or (6) the nearest point of any sign or marking designating an area as a public transportation stop. (e) In addition to any enforcement action by a peace officer for a violation of this section, any person who is a victim of a solicitation prohibited under Subsection (b) or (c), or who witnesses a violation of Subsection (c), may file a complaint with the city attorney. Evidence to support a conviction for a violation of this section may include, but is not limited to, testimony of witnesses, videotape evidence of the violation, and other admissible evidence. (Ord. Nos. 21030; 25213) SEC. 28 -63.3. SOLICITATIONS TO OCCUPANTS OF VEHICLES ON PUBLIC ROADWAYS PROHIBITED. 15 111 (a) In this section: (1) GOODS means property of every kind. (2) PUBLIC PROPERTY means: (A) any property open or devoted to public use or owned by the city; and (B) any area dedicated to the public use for sidewalk, street, highway, or other transportation purposes, including, but not limited to, any curb, median, parkway, shoulder, sidewalk, alley, drive, or public right -of -way. (3) ROADWAY has the meaning given that term in Chapter 541, Texas Transportation Code. (4) SERVICES means any work done for the benefit of another person. (5) SOLICITATION means any conduct or act whereby a person: (A) either orally or in writing, asks for a ride, employment, goods, services, financial aid, monetary gifts, or any article representing monetary value, for any purpose; (B) either orally or in writing, sells or offers for sale goods, services, or publications; (C) distributes without remuneration goods, services, or publications; or (D) solicits signatures on a petition or opinions for a survey. (6) VEHICLE has the meaning given that term in Chapter 541, Texas Transportation Code. (b) A person commits an offense if, while occupying any public property adjacent to any public roadway in the city, he knowingly conducts a solicitation directed to, or intended to attract the attention of, the occupant of any vehicle stopped or traveling on the roadway. An offense occurs when the solicitation is made, whether or not an actual employment relationship is created, a transaction is completed, or an exchange of money, goods, or services takes place. (c) It is a defense to prosecution under Subsection (b) that the person was: (1) summoning aid or requesting assistance in an emergency situation; or (2) a law enforcement officer in the performance of official duties. (d) In addition to any enforcement action by a peace officer for a violation of this section, any person who is a victim of a solicitation prohibited under Subsection (b), or who witnesses a violation of Subsection (b), may file a complaint with the city attorney. Evidence to support a conviction for a violation of this section may include, but is not limited to, testimony of witnesses, videotape evidence of the violation, and other admissible evidence. (Ord. 25213) CITY OF DAYTON, OHIO Sec. 70.05. Manner of riding and solicitation. (A) No person while on a roadway outside a safety zone shall solicit a ride from the driver of any vehicle. (B) No person shall stand on a highway for the purpose of soliciting employment, business, or contributions from the occupant of any vehicle. Sec. 137.14. Definitions. ...Panhandling does not include passively standing or sitting with a sign or other indication that one is seeking donations, without addressing any solicitation to any specific person other than in response to an inquiry by that person. Sec. 137.16. Place of panhandling. No person shall panhandle by soliciting a person in any of the following places: (A) At any bus stop; (B) In any public transportation vehicle or facility; (C) In any vehicle within the public right -of -way; 16 112 (D) Within 20 feet of any entrance or exit of any bank, savings and loan association, credit union, or check cashing business during its business hours or within 20 feet of any automated teller machine during the time it is available for customers' use; (E) In or at any sports stadium owned or operated by a political subdivision; (F) In or at any hall or theater owned or operated by a political subdivision; (G) In or at the Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park; (H) In or at the National Afro American Museum and Cultural Center; (1) On private property, unless the panhandler has permission from the owner or occupant. Sec. 137.20. Registration. (A) No person shall panhandle without a registration issued by the Chief of Police. The registration shall include the name and photograph of the person to whom it is issued. Any person who has been registered shall display the registration in plain view on the front of that person at all times while panhandling. No person whose registration has been revoked shall panhandle for a period of two years following the revocation... CITY OF DENVER, COLORADO Sec. 38 -132. Panhandling. (a) Definitions. For the purpose of this section: (1) Aggressive panhandling shall mean: a. Continuing to solicit from a person after the person has given a negative response to such soliciting; b. intentionally touching or causing physical contact with another person without that person's consent in the course of soliciting; c. Intentionally blocking or interfering with the safe or free passage of a pedestrian or vehicle by any means, including unreasonably causing a pedestrian or vehicle operator to take evasive action to avoid physical contact; d. Using violent or threatening gestures toward a person solicited; e. Persisting in closely following or approaching the person being solicited, with the intent of asking that person for money or other things of value, after the person solicited has been solicited and informed the solicitor by words or conduct that such person does not want to be solicited or does not want to give money or any thing of value to the solicitor; f. Using profane or abusive language which is likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction from the person being solicited; g. Soliciting money from anyone who is waiting in line for tickets, for entry to a building, or for another purpose. h. Approaching or following a person for solicitation as part of a group of two (2) or more persons, in a manner and with conduct, words, or gestures intended or likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or damage to or loss of property or otherwise to be intimidated into giving money or other thing of value. (2) Soliciting or Panhandling for purposes of this section are interchangeable and mean any solicitation made in person requesting an immediate donation of money. Purchase of an item for an amount far exceeding its value, under circumstances where a reasonable person would understand that the purchase is in substance a donation, is a donation for the purpose of this chapter. Panhandling does not include passively standing or sitting with a sign or other indication that one is seeking donations, without addressing any solicitation to any specific person other than in response to an inquiry by that person. 17 113 (3) Public place shall mean a place to which the public or a substantial group of persons has access, including but not limited to any street, sidewalk, highway, parking lot, plaza, transportation facility, school, place of amusement, park, or playground. (4) Financial institution shall mean any bank, industrial bank, credit union, or savings and loan as defined in Title 11 of the Colorado Revised Statutes. (5) Automated teller machine shall mean a device, linked to a financial institution's account record which is able to carry out transactions, including, but not limited to: account transfers, deposits, cash withdrawals, balance inquiries, and mortgage and loan payments. (6) Automated teller machine facility shall mean the area comprised of one (1) or more automatic teller machines, and any adjacent space which is made available to banking customers after regular banking hours. (b) Prohibited acts. (1) No person shall engage in aggressive panhandling in any public place. (2) No person shall panhandle on private or residential property after having been asked to leave or refrain from panhandling by the owner or other person lawfully in possession of such property. (3) No person shall panhandle within twenty feet of public toilets. (4) No person shall panhandle within twenty (20) feet of any automated teller machine. Provided, however, that when an automated teller machine is located within an automated teller machine facility, such distance shall be measured from the entrance or exit of the facility. (5) No person shall solicit from any operator or occupant of a motor vehicle on a public street in exchange for blocking, occupying, or reserving a public parking space, or directing the operator or occupant to a public parking space. (6) No person shall panhandle in any public transportation vehicle, or within twenty (20` feet of any bus, train, or light -rail station or stop, or within the bus transit lane on the 16th Street Mall, or in any public parking lot or structure. (7) No person shall panhandle within six (6) feet of an entrance to a building. (8) No person shall panhandle within twenty (20) feet of any pay telephone, provided that when a pay telephone is located within a telephone booth or other facility, such distance shall be measured from the entrance or exit of the telephone booth or facility. (9) No person shall solicit or panhandle after dark, which shall mean one -half hour after sunset until one -half hour before sunrise. (10) No person shall solicitor panhandle within twenty (20) feet of any outdoor patio where food or drink are served. Sec. 54 -548. Solicitation on or near street or highway. (a) The purpose of this section is to prevent dangers to persons and property, to prevent delays, and to avoid interference with the traffic flow. Roadways that have center medians often are designed to deal with specific traffic flow problems. The presence of pedestrians on center medians poses dangers to both pedestrians and traffic and interferes with the traffic planning process. Any delay or distraction may interfere with traffic planning. Sometimes persons stand near intersections and near traffic lights to contact drivers or passengers in cars that are passing or that are stopped temporarily due to traffic lights. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to solicit employment, business, contributions, or sales of any kind, or collect monies for the same, from the occupant of any vehicle traveling upon any street, road or highway when such solicitation or collection: (1) Causes the person performing the activity to enter onto the traveled portion of a street or highway; or 18 114 (2) Involves the person performing the activity to be located upon any median area which separates traffic lanes for vehicular travel in opposite directions. (c) It shall be unlawful for any person to solicit or attempt to solicit employment, business, contributions or sales of any kind from the occupant of any vehicle on any highway included in the interstate system including any entrance to or exit from such highway. (d) For purposes of this section, the traveled portion of the street or highway shall mean that portion of the road normally used by moving motor vehicle traffic. (Ord. No. 407 -01, 1, 5- 14 -01; Ord. No. 803 -05, 1, 12 -5 -05) CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON WHEREAS, the current provisions of the Federal Way City Code include regulation of activity that involves aggressive begging, such as intimidation, false or misleading activities, or activities that involve safety concerns for people; and WHEREAS, because there is an increase of activities at off -ramps and along public rights -of -way that interfere with or potentially jeopardize the safety of pedestrians or vehicular traffic, it is appropriate that the provisions of the aggressive begging ordinance be modified to assure a better ability of the law enforcement officials to protect the safety of the public that may otherwise be threatened; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 6, Article VIII, Section 6 -188 of the Federal Way City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 6 -188 Aggressive begging. (a) It is a crime for any person to engage in aggressive begging in any public place in the city as those terms are defined by this section. (b) As used in this section: (1) Aggressive begging shall mean (a) to beg with intent to intimidate another person into giving money or goods, (b) to beg with the use of false or misleading information, (c) to beg with or to involve activities that are unsafe or dangerous to any person or property or to beg at locations or in a manner that threatens the safety of persons or property or that impedes or threatens to impede pedestrian or vehicular traffic, (d) to beg in a manner that exploits children, or (e) to willfully provide or deliver or attempt to provide or deliver unrequested or unsolicited services or products with a demand or exertion of pressure for payment in return. (2) Beg shall mean to ask for money or goods as a charity, whether by words, bodily gestures, signs or other means. (3) Intimidate shall mean to engage in conduct which would make a reasonable person fearful or feel compelled. (4) Public place shall mean any road, alley, lane, parking area, sidewalk or any place, private or otherwise, adopted to and fitted for vehicular or pedestrian travel, that is in common use by the public with the consent, expressed or implied, of the owner or owners, and further, any public playground, school grounds, recreation grounds, parks, parkways, park drives, park paths and rights -of -way open to the use of the public. (5) Exploit children shall mean using children in an unethical, selfish, or abusive manner or in any other manner that gives an unfair advantage. Section 2. Severabilitv. The provisions of this ordinance are declared separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. L 115 CITY OF GALVESTON, TEXAS Sec. 24 -19. Aggressive solicitation. (a) Definitions. The following words, terms, and phrases when used in this section shall have the meaning ascribed to them in this subsection, unless the context of their usage clearly indicates another meaning: (1) Aggressive manner means and includes: a. Intentionally or recklessly making any physical contact with or touching another person in the course of the solicitation without the person's consent; b. Following the person being solicited, if that conduct is: (i) Intended to or is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon property in the person's possession; or (ii) Is intended to or is reasonably likely to intimidate the person being solicited into responding affirmatively to the solicitation; c. Continuing to solicit within eight (8) feet of the person being solicited after the person has made a negative response, if continuing the solicitation is: (i) Intended to or is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon property in the person's possession; or (ii) Is intended to or is reasonably likely to intimidate the person being solicited into responding affirmatively to the solicitation; d. Intentionally or recklessly blocking the safe or free passage of the person being solicited or requiring the person, or the driver of a vehicle, to take evasive action to avoid physical contact with the person making the solicitation. Acts authorized as an exercise of one's constitutional right to picket or legally protest, and acts authorized by a permit issued by the city, shall not constitute obstruction of pedestrian or vehicular traffic; e. Intentionally or recklessly using obscene or abusive language or gestures: (i) Intended to or likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon property in the person's possession; or (ii) Words intended to or reasonably likely to intimidate the person into responding affirmatively to the solicitation; or f. Approaching the person being solicited in a manner that (i) Is intended to or is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon property in the person's possession; or (ii) Is intended to or is reasonably likely to intimidate the person being solicited into responding affirmatively to the solicitation. (2) Automated feller machine or ATM means a device, linked to a financial institution's account records, which is able to carry out transactions, including, but not limited to: account transfers, deposits, cash withdrawals, balance inquiries, and mortgage and loan payments. (3) Automated teller machine facility means the area comprised of one or more automatic teller machines, and any adjacent space, which is made available to banking customers. (4) Bank includes a bank, savings bank, savings and loan association, credit union, trust company, or similar financial institution. (5) Check cashing business means a person in the business of cashing checks, drafts, or money orders for consideration. (6) Coin operated machine means a coin or cash operated contrivance, apparatus, or equipment used for the purpose of providing sales of goods or services. (7) Fuel dispensing device means a pump or other machine utilized for dispensing fuel to motor vehicles for a fee. 20 M (8) Pay telephone means any coin- operated or credit or debit card reader operated telephone located on any public or private property that is accessible for public use. (9) Parking meter means any coin operated meter utilized to charge for parking a motor vehicle on public property. (10) Parking fee collection box means a device utilized to collect coins or currency as a charge for parking a motor vehicle on private property. (11) Public area means an outdoor area to which the public has access and includes, but is not limited to, a sidewalk, street, highway, park, parking lot, alleyway, pedestrian way, or the common area of a school, hospital, library, office building, transport facility, or shop. (12) Request means any imperative instruction, whether verbal or non verbal, by a solicitee to a solicitor to desist the solicitation including but not limited to words or gestures such as "stop," "back off', "stay back", "get away "leave me alone," or "withdraw (13) Solicitation means the act of panhandling by seeking through a communication with another person, whether by gesture or verbally, funds or good for food, personal favors, (such as trips, transportation, clothing, or other) drink, lodging, vehicle fare, or any other purpose to directly benefit an individual or his family members. (14) Solicitee means any individual to whom a solicitor, as defined herein, directs a solicitation. (15) Solicitor means any person who engages in the act of solicitation as defined above. (16) Transportation facility means a facility or designated location that is owned, operated, or maintained by the city and is designed to serve as point from which patrons take ingress and egress from the transit system and includes one more of the following structures. a sign or signs indicating a transit stop or pick -up point, a shelter for transit patrons, or benches or chairs for transit patrons. (17) Transit system means a vehicle, including but not limited to a bus or trolley, operated by the city for public transportation. (b) Prohibited acts. it shall be unlawful for any person to solicit money or other things of value, or to solicit the sale of goods or services: (1) In an aggressive manner in a public area; (2) In any public transportation vehicle or transportation facility; (3) At a marked crosswalk; (4) Within twenty -five (25) feet of a. An automated teller facility; b. The entrance or exit of a bank; c. The entrance or exit of a check cashing business; d. Coin operated machine; e. Fuel dispensing device; f. Parking meter or parking fee collection box; or, g. Pay telephone. (5) On private property if the owner, tenant, or lawful occupant has asked the person not to solicit on the property, or has posted a sign clearly indicating that solicitations are not welcome on the property; or (6) From any operator of a motor vehicle that is in traffic on a public street, whether in exchange for cleaning the vehicle's windows, or for blocking, occupying, or reserving a public parking space, or directing the occupant to a public parking space; provided, however, that this paragraph shall not apply to services rendered in connection with emergency repairs requested by the operator or passengers of such vehicle. 21 117 (c) Penalties. A violation of this section shall be a Class C misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00). In lieu of, or in addition to the penalty provided in this section, a person in violation of this section may be required to perform community service work as described by the court. A culpable mental state is not required, and need not be proved, for an offense under subsections (b)(2), (3), (4). (Ord. No. 02 -055, 2, 6- 13 -02) CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS Sec. 28-46. Aggressive panhandling. (a) The following words, terms, and phrases when used in this section shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this subsection, unless the context of their usage clearly indicates another meaning: Automated teller machine or ATM means a machine, other than a telephone, that is capable of being operated by a patron to communicate to a financial institution: (1) A request to withdraw money from an account directly or under a line of credit previously authorized; (2) An instruction to deposit money in an account with the financial institution; (3) An instruction to transfer money between one or more accounts maintained with the financial institution; (4) An instruction to apply money against an indebtedness to the financial institution; or (5) A request for information concerning the balance of the account with the financial institution. Fuel dispensing device means a pump or other machine utilized for dispensing fuel to motor vehicles for a fee. Pay telephone means any coin operated or credit or debit card reader operated telephone located on any public or private property that is accessible for public use. Parking meter means any coin operated meter utilized to charge for parking a motor vehicle on public property. Parking fee collection box means a device utilized to collect coins or currency as a charge for parking a motor vehicle on private property. Public place means a street, sidewalk, or other place that is open to the public. Request means any imperative instruction, whether verbal or non- verbal, by a solicitee to a solicitor to desist the solicitation including but not limited to words or gestures such as "stop," "back off," "stay back," "get away," "leave me alone," or "withdraw." Solicitation means the act of panhandling by seeking through a communication with another person, whether by gesture or verbally, funds or goods for food, personal favors (such as trips, transportation, clothing, or other), drink, lodging, vehicle fare, or any other purpose to directly benefit an individual or his family members. Solicitee means any individual to whom a solicitor, as defined herein, directs a solicitation. Solicitor means any person who engages in the act of solicitation as defined above. Transit facility means a facility that: (1) is owned and operated by the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas (METRO); (2) Constitutes a permanent and integral part of the transit system of METRO; (3) Is designed to serve as a point from which METRO patrons take ingress and egress from the METRO transit system; and (4) Includes one or more of the following structures: a sign or signs indicating a transit stop or pick -up point, a shelter for transit patrons or benches or chairs for transit patrons. 22 UWKI (b) Immediately upon any request from a solicitee to a solicitor, a solicitor who is in a public place at the moment the request is made shall discontinue the solicitation until there is a space of at least eight feet between the solicitor and the solicitee or, in the alternative, discontinue all efforts to engage in the solicitation if within eight feet proximity to a requesting solicitee. (c) For the purposes of subsection (b) of this section, distance shall be measured from any extension of the solicitor's body, including without limitation any sign or other object being used or carried by the solicitor, to any part of the solicitee's body. (d) Regardless of whether or not any request is made by the solicitee to the solicitor, no solicitor shall engage in solicitation within a distance of eight feet from any ATM, pay telephone, parking meter, parking fee collection box, transit facility, or fuel dispensing device. (e) For the purposes of subsection (d) of this section, distance shall be measured from any extension of the solicitor's body, including without limitation any sign or other object being used or carried by the solicitor, to any part of the physical structure of the ATM, pay telephone, parking meter, parking fee collection box, transit facility, or fuel dispensing device. (f) Any person who knowingly or intentionally violates any provision of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be punished as provided by section 1 -6 of this Code. (Ord. No. 92 -390, 2, 4 -8 -92; Ord. No. 92 -1449, 48,11-4-92; Ord. No. 02 -504, 3, 6- 12 -02) CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA Sec. 407 -102. Panhandling. (a) As used in this section, panhandling means any solicitation made in person upon any street, public place or park in the city, in which a person requests an immediate donation of money or other gratuity from another person, and includes but is not limited to seeking donations: (1) By vocal appeal or for music, singing, or other street performance; and (2) Where the person being solicited receives an item of little or no monetary value in exchange for a donation, under circumstances where a reasonable person would understand that the transaction is in substance a donation. However, panhandling shall not include the act of passively standing or sitting nor performing music, singing or other street performance with a sign or other indication that a donation is being sought, without any vocal request other than in response to an inquiry by another person. (b) It shall be unlawful to engage in an act of panhandling on any day after sunset, or before sunrise. (c) It shall be unlawful to engage in an act of panhandling when either the panhandler or the person being solicited is located at any of the following locations: at a bus stop; in any public transportation vehicle or public transportation facility; in a vehicle which is parked or stopped on a public street or alley; in a sidewalk cafe; or within twenty (20) feet in any direction from an automatic teller machine or entrance to a bank. (d) It shall be unlawful to engage in an act of panhandling in an aggressive manner, including any of the following actions; (1) Touching the solicited person without the solicited person's consent; (2) Panhandling a person while such person is standing in line and waiting to be admitted to a commercial establishment; (3) Blocking the path of a person being solicited, or the entrance to any building or vehicle; 23 119 (4) Following behind, ahead or alongside a person who walks away from the panhandler after being solicited; (5) Using profane or abusive language, either during the solicitation or following a refusal to make a donation, or making any statement, gesture, or other communication which would cause a reasonable person to be fearful or feel compelled; or (6) Panhandling in a group of two (2) or more persons. (e) Each act of panhandling prohibited by this section shall constitute a public nuisance and a separate violation of this Code. Each violation shall be punishable as provided in section 103 -3 of this Code, and the court shall enjoin any such violator from committing further violations of this section. (Code 1975, 20 -8; G.O. 78, 1999, 1) CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI Sec. 50 -151. Aggressive begging /begging at specified locations. (a) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to regulate and punish acts of aggressive begging and acts of begging that occur at locations or under circumstances specified herein which create an enhanced sense of fear or intimidation in the person being solicited or create disorder upon public streets or other public areas. The purpose of this section is not to punish the status or condition of any person. Regulation is required because aggressive begging anywhere in the city contributes to the loss of access to and enjoyment of public places and creates a sense of fear, intimidation and disorder. The city has substantial interests in the protection of public safety, the use of public transportation, the safe and unobstructed flow of traffic on its public streets and the preservation of the safe use of public areas. The regulations in this section further these substantial interests. This section is not intended to proscribe any demand for payment for services rendered or goods delivered. Nor is this section intended to prohibit acts authorized as an exercise of a person's constitutional right to legally picket, protest or speak. (b) Definitions. Aggressive manner means: (1) Threatening approaches. Approaching the person being solicited in a manner that: a. Is intended to or is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon property in the person's possession; or b. Is intended to or is likely to intimidate the person being solicited into responding affirmatively to the solicitation; (2) Following. Following the person being solicited, if that conduct is: a. Intended to or is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon property in the person's possession; or b. Is intended to or is likely to intimidate the person being solicited into responding affirmatively to the solicitation; (3) Physical contact. Intentionally or recklessly making any physical contact with or touching another person in the course of the solicitation, or approaching within an arm's length of the person, except with the person's consent; (4) Continuing to solicit. Continuing to solicit a person after the person has made a negative response, if continuing the solicitation is: a. Intended to or is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon property in the person's possession; or b. Is intended to or is reasonably likely to intimidate the person being solicited into responding affirmatively to the solicitation; (5) Verbal threats. Intentionally or recklessly using words: a. Intended to or likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon property in the persons' possession; or 24 120 b. Words likely to intimidate the person into responding affirmatively to the solicitation; or (6) Blocking sidewalks or streets. Intentionally or recklessly blocking the safe or free passage of the person being solicited or requiring the person, or the driver of a vehicle, to take evasive action to avoid physical contact with the person making the solicitation. Automated teller machine is a device, linked to a financial institution's account records, which is able to carry out transactions, including, but not limited to: Account transfers, deposits, cash withdrawals, balance inquiries and mortgage and loan payments. Automated teller machine facility is the area comprised of one or more automatic teller machines, and any adjacent space, which is made available to banking customers. Intimidate means to engage in conduct which would make a reasonable person feel threatened or fearful of harm to the person's personal safety or property. Public area is an area open to use by the general public, including, but not limited to, alleys, bridges, buildings, driveways, parking lots, parks, plazas, sidewalks and streets open to the general public, and the doorways and entrances to buildings and dwellings, and the grounds enclosing them. To solicit includes, without limitation, the spoken, written or printed word or such other acts or bodily gestures as are conducted in furtherance of the purposes of begging, soliciting or asking for any item of value, monetary or otherwise. (c) Prohibitions. (1) Aggressive begging or soliciting. It shall be unlawful for any person to solicit money or other things of value, or to solicit the sale of goods or services, in an aggressive manner in a public area. (2) Public transportation. It shall be unlawful to solicit money or other things of value, or to solicit the sale of goods or services in any public transportation vehicle, or bus or train station or stop. (3) Automated teller machine. It shall be unlawful to solicit money or other things of value, or to solicit the sale of goods or services, if the person making the solicitation knows or reasonably should know that the solicitation is occurring within 15 feet of an automated teller machine or automated teller machine facility, or within 15 feet of any entrance or exit to a building containing an automated teller machine or automated teller machine facility. (4) Walk -up or drive -up teller window. It shall be unlawful to solicit money or other things of value, or to solicit the sale of goods or services, if the person making the solicitation knows or reasonably should know that the solicitation is occurring within 15 feet of a walk -up or drive -up teller window located on the exterior of the building of a financial institution which is made available to its banking customers. (5) Private property. It shall be unlawful to solicit money or other things of value, or to solicit the sale of goods or services on private property or residential property, if the owner, tenant or lawful occupant has asked the person not to solicit on the property, or has posted a sign clearly indicating that solicitations are not welcome on the property. (6) Motor vehicles to be parked. It shall be unlawful to solicit money or other things of value from any operator or occupant of a motor vehicle on a public street in exchange for blocking, occupying or reserving a public space, directing the occupant to a public parking space or protecting a parked vehicle. (Code of Gen. Ords. 1967, 26.4; Ord. No. 960297, 1, 4- 18 -96) CITY OF KEY WEST, FLORIDA Sec. 42 -11. No panhandling /no solicitation areas. a) Definitions 25 121 Clinton Square shall mean that area of the Historic District, including its streets and sidewalks, and its interior park, bounded by Whitehead Street from Greene Street to Front Street, Front Street from Whitehead Street/David Wolkowsky Street to Greene Street, and Greene Street from Front Street to Whitehead Street. Mallory Square shall mean the entire dimensions of Mallory Square including its pier, parking lot, the Waterfront Playhouse, the Sculpture Garden, and that portion of any other structure facing Mallory Square; Tift Alley; and Wall Street from the perimeter wall of the Mallory Square Parking Lot to Fitzpatrick Street Panhandling shall mean begging or asking or soliciting money or goods for charity or personal gain, whether by word, bodily gestures, signs or other means. Solicitation shall mean an offer by a person to perform a service or to sell a good in exchange for money or other type of compensation. For the purposes of this section, solicitation shall not mean such an offer by: (i) a person who holds an occupational license issued by the city for a business location when the offer is made at such location; (ii) a person who holds a mobile vendor's license, a coconut palm frond permit, or other specific license or permit issued by the city; or (iii) a person whose offered good or service is artistic in nature. Southernmost Point shall mean that area of the Historic District, including the Southernmost Point Monument and including the sidewalks and streets bounded by South Street from Duval Street to Whitehead Street and Whitehead Street from South Street to United Street. (b) Prohibition. Panhandling and solicitation are prohibited in Clinton Square, Mallory Square, and at the Southernmost Point. Panhandling and solicitation are prohibited on Simonton Street, Duval Street and Whitehead Street between and including Front Street and Angela Street.The city manager shall post signs in each area advising the public of this prohibition. (c) Penalty. A violation of this section shall be punishable in accordance with section 1- 15 of the Code of Ordinances.(Ord. No. 02 -13, 1, 5 -7 -02) Sec. 42 -3. Aggressive or obstructive panhandling. (a) The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this section, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this subsection, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Aggressively beg means to beg with the intent to intimidate another person into giving money or goods. Beg means to ask or solicit for money or goods as a charity, whether by word, bodily gestures, signs, or other means. Intimidate means to engage in conduct which would make a reasonable person fearful or feel compelled. Among the circumstances that may be considered in determining whether the actor intends to intimidate another person into giving money or goods are that the actor refuses to identify himself or manifestly endeavors to conceal himself or any object. Unless flight by the person or other circumstance makes it impracticable, a law enforcement officer shall, prior to any arrest for an offense under this section, afford the person an opportunity to dispel any alarm or immediate concern which would otherwise be warranted by requesting him whether the actor: (1) Touches the person solicited; (2) Follows the person solicited, and persists in begging after the person solicited has given a negative response; (3) Directs profane or abusive language toward the person solicited; or (4) Acts in a violent or threatening manner toward the person solicited 26 122 Obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic means to walk, stand, sit, lie, or place an object in such a manner as to block passage by another person or a vehicle, or to require another person or a driver of a vehicle to take unreasonable evasive action to avoid physical contact. Public place means an area accessible to the public and includes alleys, bridges, buildings, decks, driveways, parking lots, parks, plazas, sidewalks, school grounds, streets and other rights -of -way open to the general public, including those that serve food or drink or provide entertainment, and the doorways and entrances to buildings or dwellings and the grounds enclosing them. Unreasonable evasive action means causing a vehicle to depart from the lane of traffic in which it is traveling to change lanes, to straddle lanes, or to enter onto a swale to obtain passage; it also means causing a pedestrian to leave the sidewalk on which he is traveling or to make contact with a wall or fence bordering the sidewalk. b) A person shall be guilty of aggressive or obstructive interference if, in a public place, he intentionally (i) aggressively begs, or (ii) obstructs pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Acts authorized as an exercise of one's constitutional right of assembly and free speech and acts authorized by a permit or a special events license duly issued by the city or by lease of real property owned by the city shall not constitute a violation under this section. c) A violation of this section shall be punishable as provided in section 1 -15. Nothing in this subsection shall limit the discretion of police, court personnel or judges from referring persons suspected, charged or convicted of a violation of this section to treatment programs or facilities that provide an alternative to prosecution or incarceration, if the alleged or convicted violator consents.(Code 1986, 81.03) CITY OF LAREDO, TEXAS Sec. 21 -251. Definitions. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the following definitions are applicable to this article only: Highway or street means the width between the boundary lines of a publicly maintained way any part of which is open to the public for vehicular traffic. Individuals means a natural person. Obstruct means to render impassable or to render passage unreasonably inconvenient, unsafe, or hazardous. Person means and includes both individual persons and organizations. Right -of -way means any land owned by the city which is subject to the right of passage held by the public in general. Roadway means the portion of the highway, other than the berm or shoulder, that is improved, designed, or ordinarily used for vehicular travel. Shoulder means the portion of a highway that is: (1) Adjacent to the roadway; (2) Designed or ordinarily used for parking; (3) Distinguished from the roadway by different design, construction, or marking; and (4) Not intended for normal vehicular travel. Sidewalk means the portion of a street that is between a curb or lateral line of a roadway and the adjacent property line and is for the exclusive use of pedestrians. Solicit, soliciting or solicitation means to request an immediate donation of money or other thing of value from another person, regardless of the solicitor's purpose or intended use of the money or other thing of value. The solicitation may be, without limitation, by the spoken, written, or printed word, or by other means of communication. Purchase of an item for an amount far exceeding its value, under circumstances where a 27 123 reasonable person would understand that the purchase is in substance a donation, is a solicitation. Street or highway means the entire width between the boundary lines of every way publicly maintained when any part thereof is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular traffic. Traffic control signal means any device, whether manually, electrically, or mechanically operated, by which traffic is alternately directed to stop and permitted to proceed. Traffic island means a curbed barrier within a street or roadway designated for the purpose of separating or directing streams of vehicular traffic. (Ord. No. 98 -215, 2, 8- 24 -98; Ord. No. 2004 -0 -331, 1, 12- 20 -04) Sec. 21 -252. Time of solicitation. It shall be unlawful for any person to solicit outside a building after sunset or before sunrise. (Ord. No. 98 -215, 2, 8- 24 -98) Sec. 21 -253. Place of solicitation. It shall be unlawful for any person to solicit in any of the following places or to solicit from persons who are in the following places: (1) At any bus stop; (2) In any public transportation vehicle or facility; (3) On private property, unless the solicitor has permission from the owner or tenant; (4) Within twenty (20) feet of any entrance way into or exit from any public building; (5) Within forty (40) feet of any outdoor automatic teller machine (ATM); (6) On any public property, unless allowed by other provisions of this article; (7) Anywhere in the public right -of -way used for vehicular traffic, street, highway or roadway, unless in conformance with the requirements of section 21 -254. (Ord. No. 98 -215, 2, 8- 24 -98; Ord. No. 2004 -0 -331, 1, 12- 20 -04) Sec, 21 -254. Manner of solicitation. It shall be unlawful for any person to solicit in any of the following manners: (1) By coming within five (5) feet of the person solicited, until that person has indicated that he or she wishes to make a donation; (2) By blocking the path of the person solicited, or other pedestrians, along a sidewalk or street by walking, standing, sitting, lying, or placing an object in such a manner as to block passage by another person or vehicle, or to require another person or vehicle to take evasive action to avoid physical contact; (3) By following a person who walks away from the solicitor while the solicitor is in the act of soliciting; (4) By using profane or abusive language, either during the solicitation or following a refusal; (5) By soliciting in a group of two (2) or more persons when such solicitors are standing within ten (10) feet of each other; (6) While under the influence of alcohol or any illegal narcotic or controlled substance; or (7) By stepping into or remaining in a roadway, unless the controlling traffic signal has stopped all vehicular movement. The only time a solicitor is allowed to step into the roadway is when traffic has come to a complete stop. The solicitor may step into the roadway only to collect contributions from vehicles. Walking in between lanes of moving traffic is strictly prohibited and such will be cause to terminate the solicitation by that organization. (Ord. No. 98 -215, 2, 8- 24 -98; Ord. No. 2004 -0 -331, 1, 12- 20 -04) Sec. 21 -255. False or misleading solicitation. 28 124 Any person who knowingly makes a false or misleading representation in the course of soliciting a donation shall be prohibited from further solicitation and will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Upon conviction, that person shall be deemed guilty of a class C misdemeanor. Instances of false or misleading representations include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) Stating that the solicitor is soliciting on behalf of an organization which does not exist or which has not authorized the solicitor to seek donation on its behalf. (2) Wearing a military, medical or religious order uniform or other indication of military service, medical profession or religious order when the solicitor is neither a present nor former member of the service indicated, a member of such medical profession or a member of such religious order. (3) Wearing or displaying an indication of physical disability, when the solicitor does not suffer the disability indicated or using makeup or a device to simulate any deformity. (4) Reserved. (Ord. No. 98 -215, 2, 8- 24 -98; Ord. No. 2004 -0 -331, 1, 12- 20 -04) Sec. 21 -256. Streets and highways solicitation. (a) Requirement for solicitors. All solicitors must comply with the following requirements: (1) Wear a high visibility traffic vest at all times during the solicitation; (2) Solicit only at intersections controlled by a traffic control signal and within forty (40) feet of the said intersection where all traffic is required to come to a full stop; (3) Solicit only while located on a curbed traffic island, shoulder, improved shoulder or sidewalk by the roadway (if the center areas between lines of traffic do not have curbed traffic islands, then no solicitation is permitted there.) Traffic cones are recommended to be placed on the curbed traffic island, shoulder, improved shoulder or sidewalk by the roadway; (4) Wait to solicit until the traffic has come to a full stop. Solicitors must move away from the vehicles before the traffic control signal turns green and traffic starts to move again; (5) Beat least eighteen (18) years of age. it shall be unlawful to cause children, defined as persons under the age of eighteen (18) years, to solicit or attempt to solicit funds from the occupants of a vehicle on a roadway; (6) Solicitors must not stand in a roadway, except solicitors may enter a roadway to collect funds as a result of an immediate solicitation and only when traffic has stopped and it is safe to enter such roadway; and (7) Solicitors must never obstruct traffic. (b) CPR and first aid certifications required for group solicitations. Group solicitations involving more than four (4) adults in the group must provide a person certified in CPR and first aid at each location of solicitation. (Ord. No. 98 -215, 2, 8- 24 -98; Ord. No. 2004 -0 -331, 1, 12- 20 -04) Sec. 21 -257. Scope of article. This article which regulates the time, place and manner of solicitation is intended to apply to aggressive solicitation by individuals, as well as noncommercial street solicitation, as defined in chapter [section] 28 -139 of the Code of Ordinances. (Ord. No. 2004 -0 -331, 1, 12- 20 -04) Sec. 21 -258. Enforcement. In addition to enforcement by the Laredo Police Department, the city's code enforcement officers are also responsible for enforcing the provisions of this article. Both police officers and code enforcement officers are authorized to halt and order the dispersal of any ongoing solicitation by an individual or a group, as a consequence of violating any provision of this ordinance. 29 125 (Ord. No. 2004 -0 -331, 1, 12- 20 -04) Sec. 21 -259. Penalties. Each day any violation of this article shall continue shall constitute a separate offense. Upon conviction, each offense is punishable by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500.00). Any person convicted of violating any provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a class "C" misdemeanor. (Ord. No. 2004 -0 -331, 1, 12 -20 -040 Secs. 21- 260 -21 -270. Reserved CITY OF LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 10.44.010 Definitions. For purposes of this Chapter: (A) "Solicitation," for purposes of this Chapter, means to ask, beg, solicit or plead, whether orally, or in a written or printed manner, for the purpose of obtaining money, charity, business or patronage, or gifts of items of value for oneself or another person or organization. (B) "Coercion" means to wilfully and knowingly: (1) Approach or speak to a person in such a manner as would cause a reasonable person to believe that the person is being threatened with: (a) Imminent bodily injury, or (b) The commission of a criminal act upon the person or another person, or upon property in the person's immediate possession; (2) Persist in a solicitation after the person solicited has given a negative response; (3) Block, either individually or as part of a group of persons, the passage of a solicited person; or (4) Engage in conduct that would reasonably be construed as intended to compel or force a solicited person to accede to demands. (Ord. 3862 3 (part), 1995) 10.44.020 Solicitation, by coercion Misdemeanor. Any individual who personally commits solicitation by coercion shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. (Ord. 3862 3 (part), 1995) 10.44.030 Solicitation at certain locations Misdemeanor. Any individual who personally engages in solicitation at any of the following places shall be guilty of a misdemeanor: (A) At any bus, taxi, limousine, trolley or train stop; (B) In any public transportation vehicle or facility; (C) At any enclosed parking structure; (D) Within twenty feet of an Automatic Teller Machine (ATM); (E) Within ten feet of a point of entry to or exit from any building open to the public, including commercial establishments; (F) Within the area designated as a pedestrian mail in Ordinance 3747, in accordance with NRS 268.810 et seq. (Ord. 3862 3 (part), 1995) 10.44.040 On private property. If property is owned or controlled by a private owner or operator, nothing in this Chapter shall be construed as applying to the conduct or activity of a person on said property with the permission of the owner or operator of the property. (Ord. 3862 3 (part), 1995) 10.44.050 Effective date. 30 M Subsection (F) of Section 10.44.030 shall become effective only after adoption by the City Council of a Resolution declaring the pedestrian mall in Ordinance 3747 as being "substantially complete." Ail other parts of this ordinance shall become effective upon publication and signature. (Ord. 3862 3 (part), 1995) [Note: LV Code 11.44.030(F) not relied upon in anyway 11 -68 "Pedestrian Mall" not included or relied upon in anyway] 11.30.110 Solicitation from roadway. No person shall stand in a roadway for the purpose of soliciting a ride, employment, or business from the occupant of any vehicle. (1949 code Ch. 36 96(c): prior code 10- 16 -9(A)) CITY OF LONGMONT, COLORADO 10.20.010 Aggressive begging. No person shall beg aggressively for a gift of money or any thing of value on any public street, sidewalk, way, mall, park, building or other public property while in close proximity to the individual addressed. Aggressive begging means begging accompanied by or followed immediately by one or more of the following: A. Repeated requests after a refusal by the individual addressed; B. Blocking the passage of the individual addressed; C. Addressing fighting words to the individual addressed; or D. Touching the individual addressed. (Ord. 0 -92 -51 1 (part)) 11.38.010 Definitions. The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and enforcement of this chapter: "Median" means the area of a street, generally in the middle, which separates traffic traveling in one direction from traffic traveling in another direction, or which, at intersections, separates traffic turning left from traffic proceeding straight. Such an area is physically defined by curbing, landscaping, or other physical obstacles, to the area's use by motor vehicles, or by traffic control markings which prohibit use of a portion of the pavement of a street by motor vehicles other than to drive generally perpendicularly across the markings or to wait there awaiting the opportunity to cross or merge with the opposing lanes of traffic (also known as painted medians, which are wider than a double yellow line); or The area of a street at an intersection between the streets and a right turn only lane, roughly triangular in shape, and separated from the motor vehicular traffic lanes by curbing, landscaping, or other physical obstacles to the area's use by motor vehicles (also known as a right turn island). "Street" or "highway" means the entire width between the boundary lines of every way publicly maintained when any part thereon is open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel or the entire width of every way declared to be a public highway by any law of this state, except the area intended for pedestrian travel, such as a sidewalk. (Ord. 0- 2003 -82 11.38.020 Solicitation in or near street or highway. A. The purpose of this section is to prevent dangers to persons and property, to prevent delays, and to avoid interference with the traffic flow. Roadways that have center medians often are designed to deal with specific traffic flow problems. Any delay or distraction may interfere with traffic planning. Sometimes persons stand near intersections and near traffic lights to contact drivers or passengers in cars that are passing or that are stopped temporarily due to traffic lights. B. It shall be unlawful for any person to solicit employment, business, contributions, or sales of any kind, or collect monies for the same, from the occupant of any vehicle 31 127 traveling upon any street or highway when the person performing the activity: 1. Enters onto the traveled portion of a street or highway; or 2. Is located upon any median; or 3. Is located such that vehicles cannot move into a legal parking area to safely conduct the transaction. C. For purposes of this section, the traveled portion of the street or highway shall mean that portion of the road normally used by moving motor vehicle traffic. (Ord. 0- 2003 -82 1 (part)) CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA SEC. 41.59. PROHIBITION AGAINST CERTAIN FORMS OF AGGRESSIVE SOLICITATION. (Amended by Ord. No. 173,705, Eff. 1127101) (a) Definitions. For purposes of this section: (1) "Solicit, ask or beg" shall include using the spoken, written, or printed word, or bodily gestures, signs or other means with the purpose of obtaining an immediate donation of money or other thing of value or soliciting the sale of goods or services. (2) "Public place" shall mean a place to which the public or a substantial group of persons has access, and includes, but is not limited to, any street, highway, sidewalk, parking lot, plaza, transportation facility, school, place of amusement, park, playground, and any doorway, entrance, hallway, lobby and other portion of any business establishment, an apartment house or hotel not constituting a room or apartment designed for actual residence. (b) Aggressive Solicitation prohibited. (1) No person shall solicit, ask or beg in an aggressive manner in any public place. (2) "Aggressive manner" shall mean any of the following: (A) Approaching or speaking to a person, or following a person before, during or after soliciting, asking or begging, if that conduct is intended or is likely to cause a reasonable person to (i) fear bodily harm to oneself or to another, damage to or loss of property, or (ii) otherwise be intimidated into giving money or other thing of value; (B) Intentionally touching or causing physical contact with another person or an occupied vehicle without that person's consent in the course of soliciting, asking or begging; (C) Intentionally blocking or interfering with the safe or free passage of a pedestrian or vehicle by any means, including unreasonably causing a pedestrian or vehicle operator to take evasive action to avoid physical contact; (D) Using violent or threatening gestures toward a person solicited either before, during, or after soliciting, asking or begging (E) Persisting in closely following or approaching a person, after the person solicited has been solicited and informed the solicitor by words or conduct that such person does not want to be solicited or does not want to give money or any other thing of value to the solicitor; or (F) Using profane, offensive or abusive language which is inherently likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction, either before, during, or after solicitation. (c) All solicitation prohibited at specified locations. (1) Banks and ATMs. No person shall solicit, ask or beg within 15 feet of any entrance or exit of any bank, savings and loan association, credit union, or check cashing business during its business hours or within 15 feet of any automated teller machine during the time it is available for customers use. Provided, however, that when an automated teller machine is located within an automated teller machine facility, such 32 MR, distance shall be measured from the entrance or exit of the automated teller machine facility. Provided further that no person shall solicit, ask or beg within an automated teller machine facility where a reasonable person would or should know that he or she does not have the permission to do so from the owner or other person lawfully in possession of such facility. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit the lawful vending of goods and services within such areas. (A) Definitions. For purposes of this section: (i) "Bank" means any member bank of the Federal Reserve System, and any bank, banking association, trust company, savings bank, or other banking institution organized or operated under the laws of the United States, and any bank the deposits of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. (ii) "Savings and loan association" means any federal savings and loan association and any "insured institution" as defined in Section 401 of the National Housing Act, as amended, and any federal credit union as defined in Section 2 of the Federal Credit Union Act. (iii) "Credit union" means any federal credit union and any state chartered credit union the accounts of which are insured by the Administrator of the National Credit Union Administration. (iv) "Check cashing business" means any person duly licensed as a check seller, bill payer, or prorater pursuant to Division 3 of the California Financial Code, commencing with section 12000. (v) "Automated teller machine" shall mean any electronic information processing device which accepts or dispenses cash in connection with a credit, deposit, or convenience account. (vi) "Automated teller machine facility" shall mean the area comprised of one or more automated teller machines, and any adjacent space which is made available to banking customers after regular banking hours. (B) Exemptions. The provisions of Subdivision (c)(1) shall not apply to any unenclosed automated teller machine located within any building, structure or space whose primary purpose or function is unrelated to banking activities, including but not limited to supermarkets, airports and school buildings, provided that such automated teller machine shall be available for use only during the regular hours of operation of the building, structure or space in which such machine is located. (2) Motor vehicles and parking lots. (A) Motor vehicles. No person shall approach an operator or occupant of a motor vehicle for the purpose of soliciting, asking or begging while such vehicle is located in any public place. (B) Parking lots. No person shall solicit, ask or beg in any public parking lot or structure any time after dark. "After dark" means any time from one -half hour after sunset to one -half hour before sunrise. (C) Exemptions. Subdivision (c)(2) shall not apply to any of the following: (i) to solicitations related to business which is being conducted on the subject premises by the owner or lawful tenants; (ii) to solicitations related to the lawful towing of a vehicle; or (iii) to solicitations related to emergency repairs requested by the operator or other occupant of a vehicle. (3) Public transportation vehicles. (A) "Public transportation vehicle" shall mean any vehicle, including a trailer bus, designed, used or maintained for carrying 10 or more persons, including the driver; or a passenger vehicle designed for carrying fewer than 10 persons, including the driver, and used to carry passengers for hire. 33 129 (B) Any person who solicits, asks or begs in any public transportation vehicle is guilty of a violation of this section. (d) Penalty. A violation of this section is punishable as a misdemeanor or infraction, chargeable at the City Attorney's discretion. (e) Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. (f) Non exclusivity. Nothing in this chapter shall limit or preclude the enforcement of other applicable laws. CITY OF MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN 106 -1.1. Aggressive Panhandling. 1. DEFINITIONS. a. "Aggressive behavior" means engaging in any conduct with the intention of intimidating another person into giving away money or goods, including but not limited to, intentionally approaching, speaking to or following a person in a manner that would cause a reasonable person to fear imminent physical injury or the imminent commission of a criminal act upon the person or upon the property in the person's immediate possession; intentionally touching another person without consent; or intentionally blocking or interfering with the free passage of a person.b. "Panhandling" means begging, soliciting, or asking for any item of value; attempting to sell or obtain compensation for an item or service for an amount that is at least twice its value, or an item or service that is already offered or available at no charge to the general public; or attempting to sell or obtain compensation for an item or service under circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to conclude that the payment is in substance a donation. 2. PROHIBITED. It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in the act of panhandling when either the panhandler or the person being solicited is located at any of the following locations: a -1. At a bus stop. a -2. In any public transportation vehicle or public transportation facility. a -3. In a vehicle which is parked or stopped on a public street or alley. a -4. In a sidewalk cafe. a -5. Within 20 feet in any direction from an automatic teller machine or entrance to a bank. b. It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in the act of aggressive panhandling at any location within the city. 3. PENALTY. Any person violating this section shall upon conviction forfeit not more than $25, or in lieu of paying the forfeiture perform community service work, in accordance with s. 800.09, Wis. Stats. 34 WE CITY OF MONTLAKE TERRACE, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 2385 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1773, AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 9.40.030 TO THE MOUNTLAKE TERRACE MUNICIPAL CODE,RELATING TO AGGRESSIVE BEGGING WHEREAS, current provisions of the Mountlake Terrace City Code do not regulate activity that involves aggressive begging, such as intimidation, false or misleading activities or activities that involve safety concerns for people; and WHEREAS, because there is an increasing experience of activities at off ramps or along public right- of-way that interfere with or potentially jeopardize the safety of pedestrians or vehicular traffic, it is appropriate to provide for regulation of aggressive begging to assure a better ability of the law enforcement officials to protect the safety that otherwise be threatened. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Mountlake Terrace Ordinance No. 1773 and Mountlake Terrace Municipal Code Chapter 9.40 is hereby amended by adding a new Section 9.40.030 to read as follows: 9.40.030 8A ressive BeqgLnq. A. It is unlawful for any person to engage in aggressive begging in any public place in the city, as those terms are defined by this section. B. As used in this section: 1. "Aggressive begging" shall mean: (a) begging with intent to intimidate another person into giving money or goods; (b) begging with use of false, misleading information; (c) begging with or involving activities that are unsafe or dangerous to any person or property, or begging at locations or in a manner that threatens the safety of persons or property, or that impedes or threatens to impede pedestrian or vehicular traffic; (d) begging in a manner that exploits children; or (e) willfully providing or delivering, or attempting to provide or deliver, unrequested or unsolicited services or products with a demand or exertion of pressure for payment in return. 2. 'Begging" shall mean asking for money or goods as a charity, whether by words, bodily gestures, signs or other means. 3. "To intimidate" shall mean to coerce or frighten into submission or obedience, or to engage in conduct which would make a reasonable person fearful or feel compelled. 4. "Public place" shall mean: (a) any public road, alley, lane, parking area, sidewalk, or other publicly owned building, facility or structure; (b) any public playground, school ground, recreation ground, park, parkway, park drive, park path, or right -of -way open to the use of the public; or (c) any privately owned property adapted to and fitted for vehicular or pedestrian travel that is in common use by the public with the consent, expressed or implied of owner or owners. 5. "Exploit" shall mean using in an unethical, selfish or abusive manner or in any other manner that gives an unfair advantage. C. Violation of, or failure to comply with, any provision of this section is a civil offense subject to a fine, which may be set by resolution, for the first three violations found to be committed within a twelve month period. Provided, however, a fourth or subsequent violation of the same or like provision committed within a twelve month period shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine up to $1,000 or by a jail sentence of up to 90 days, or by both such fine and jail time. D. Any person or entity cited for violation under MTMC 9.40.030 for a civil infraction may request an administrative hearing by notifying the Violations Bureau in writing within 35 131 15 days of the issuance of the citation. The requested hearing shall be brought before the Hearing Examiner in accordance with and pursuant to Chapter 2.120 MTMC. Section 2. Conflicts. All ordinances or parts of Ordinances of the City of Mountlake Terrance in conflict herewith, be and the same, are hereby repealed. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any section, sentence, clause or phase of this Ordinance. Section 4. Summary. This Ordinance or a summary thereof consisting of the title, shall be published in the official newspaper of the City and shall take effect and be in full force five days after the date of publication. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10-136 Prohibition against certain forms of aggressive solicitation. a. Definitions. For purposes of this section: (1) "Aggressive manner" shall mean: (a) Approaching or speaking to a person, or following a person before, during or after soliciting, asking or begging, if that conduct is intended or is likely to cause a reasonable person to (i) fear bodily harm to oneself or to another, damage to or loss of property, or the commission of any offense as defined in section ten of the penal law upon oneself or another, or (ii) otherwise be intimidated into giving money or other thing of value, or (iii) suffer unreasonable inconvenience, annoyance or alarm; (b) Intentionally touching or causing physical contact with another person or an occupied vehicle without that person's consent in the course of soliciting, asking or begging; (c) Intentionally blocking or interfering with the safe or free passage of a pedestrian or vehicle by any means, including unreasonably causing a pedestrian or vehicle operator to take evasive action to avoid physical contact; or (d) Using violent or threatening gestures toward a person solicited. (2) "Solicit, ask or beg shall include using the spoken, written, or printed word, or bodily gestures, signs or other means with the purpose of obtaining an immediate donation of money or other thing of value or soliciting the sale of goods or services. (3) "Public place" shall mean a place to which the public or a substantial group of persons has access, and includes, but is not limited to, any street, highway, parking lot, plaza, transportation facility, school, place of amusement, park, playground, and any hallway, lobby and other portion of an apartment house or hotel not constituting a room or apartment designed for actual residence. (4) "Bank" shall mean any banking corporation as defined in section 11 -164 of the code. (5) "Check cashing business" shall mean any person duty licensed by the superintendent of banks to engage in the business of cashing checks, drafts or money orders for consideration pursuant to the provisions of article 9 -A of the banking law. (6) "Automated teller machine" shall mean a device, linked to a financial institution's account records, which is able to carry out transactions, including, but not limited to: account transfers, deposits, cash withdrawals, balance inquiries, and mortgage and loan payments. (7) "Automated teller machine facility" shall mean the area comprised of one or more automated teller machines, and any adjacent space which is made available to banking customers after regular banking hours. b. Prohibited acts. (1) No person shall solicit, ask or beg in an aggressive manner in any public place. (2) No person shall solicit, ask or beg within ten feet of any entrance or exit of any bank or check cashing business during its business hours or within ten feet of any automated teller machine during the time it is available for customers' use. Provided, however, that when an automated teller machine is located within an automated teller machine facility, such distance shall be measured from the entrance or exit of the automated teller machine facility. Provided further that no person shall solicit, ask or beg within an automated teller machine facility 36 132 where a reasonable person would or should know that he or she does not have the permission to do so from the owner or other person lawfully in possession of such facility. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit the lawful vending of goods and services within such areas. (3) No person shall approach an operator or other occupant of a motor vehicle while such vehicle is located on any street, for the purpose of either performing or offering to perform a service in connection with such vehicle or otherwise soliciting the sale of goods or services, if such approaching, performing, offering or soliciting is done in an aggressive manner as defined in paragraph one of subdivision a of this section. Provided, however, that this paragraph shall not apply to services rendered in connection with the lawful towing of such vehicle or in connection with emergency repairs requested by the operator or other occupant of such vehicle. c. Exemptions. The provisions of this section shall not apply to any unenclosed automated teller machine located within any building, structure or space whose primary purpose or function is unrelated to banking activities, including but not limited to supermarkets, airports and school buildings, provided that such automated teller machine shall be available for use only during the regular hours of operation of the building, structure or space in which such machine is located. d. Penalties. Any violation of the provisions of this section shall constitute a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than sixteen days or by a fine not to exceed one hundred dollars, or by both. CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA Sec. 43.87. Solicitation and Off- Premises Canvassing on Public Property in the Downtown Core District of Orlando, Florida. (1) Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this Section, shall have the following meanings ascribed to them, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: (a) "Solicitation" means person -to- person communication which, directly or indirectly: (1) seeks a present donation of money or other thing of material value, or (2) is panhandling as defined in Section 43.86(1) or charitable solicitation as defined in Section 51.01 of the City Code. (b) "Off- premises canvassing" means person -to- person distribution on public property of written, printed, drawn, or illustrated matter, in whatever format, advertising or promoting a business or business activity, including, without limitation, handbill, circular, dodger, pamphlet, paper, booklet, sample or device. It does not include newspapers or other printed matter contained in receptacles. (c) 'Business" means any commercial establishment, service or activity operated for financial gain. (d) "Public property" means any street, alley, highway, parking lot, sidewalk, garage, park, plaza, building, ground, or other property owned or controlled by the City of Orlando, or any portion thereof. (e) "Downtown Core District" means an area in the City of Orlando, Florida comprised of two sectors, further defined as: [LAST OF SECTORS /STREETS DELETED] (f) "Exempt Zones" means those portions of public property within, or on the boundary of, the Downtown Core District specifically excluded by City Council from the prohibitions of Section 43.87(2). Solicitation and off premises canvassing, as defined above, and otherwise meeting the requirements of the City Code, may take place in exempt zones. The size, number and location of exempt zones shall be determined by City Council, established by Resolution and clearly marked on the public property. Maps showing theiocation of the Downtown Core District and exempt zones shall be made available at 37 133 the Orlando Police Headquarters. Exempt zones that are part of public property leased, permitted or otherwise contracted to third parties by the City shall lose their exempt status during the term of the contract. (2) Prohibitions. (a) Off Premises Canvassing: It is unlawful for any person to conduct off premises canvassing on public property in the Downtown Core District, unless: 1) Operating within and pursuant to a current franchise, concession contract, permit or agreement with the City of Orlando for the use of the public property in question; or 2) Operating a transportation service otherwise permitted by this Code or State law; or 3) Incidental to route, delivery, service, supply or repair persons responding to service calls and operating from clearly identifiable vehicles; or 4) The off premise canvassing occurs in a designated exempt zone, as defined herein. (b) Solicitation: It is unlawful to conduct solicitation, as defined herein, or for charitable purposes as defined in Section 51.01 of the City Code or panhandling purposes as defined in Section 43.86(1) of the City Code on public property in the Downtown Core District, unless: (1) The solicitation or panhandling is conducted in a designated exempt zone, as defined herein, or (2) The solicitation falls within a recognized, constitutionally guaranteed exercise of religion, press, or noncommercial speech, where money is not solicited for a present donation or exchange. Presence and conduct in an exempt zone is subject to all other regulations provided for in the Code of the City of Orlando, such as, without limitation, noise, camping, blocking passage, licensing and permitting. (3) Penalties. Any person who violates any of the provisions of Section 43.87 shall be subject to the penalties provided for in Section 1.08 of the City Code. (Ord. of 8 -21- 2000, 1, Doc. #33175) Sec. 43.88. Sitting /Lying on Sidewalks in the Downtown Core District Prohibited. (1) Definitions. Sidewalk An improved walkway intended primarily for pedestrians, usually running parallel to one or both sides of the pavement of a street and public transit waiting areas located within the public right -of -way. (2) Prohibition. It is unlawful for any person, after having been notified by a law enforcement officer of the prohibition in this section, to sit or lie down upon a public sidewalk or upon a blanket, chair, stool, or any other object placed upon a public sidewalk, in the Downtown Core District, as defined in Section 43.87 of the City Code. (3) Affirmative Defenses. It is an affirmative defense to the prohibition in this section if it is shown that: (a) Sitting or lying down on a public sidewalk is due to a medical emergency; or (b) As a result of age, infirmity or disability a person utilizes a wheelchair, walker, stroller, or similar device to move about a public sidewalk; or (c) The person is operating or patronizing a commercial establishment conducted on the public sidewalk pursuant to a street use or similar permit: or a person participating in or attending a parade, festival, performance, rally, demonstration, meeting or similar event conducted on a public sidewalk pursuant to a street use or other applicable permit; or (d) The person is sitting on a chair or bench located on the public sidewalk which is supplied by a public or private agency or by the abutting private property owner; or (e) The sitting or lying is while waiting in an orderly line for entry to any building, including shelters, or awaiting social services such as provision of meals; or outside a 38 134 box office to purchase tickets to any sporting event, concert, performance, or other special event; or (f) The sitting or lying is an integral part of a planned, publicized protest by ten (10) or more people accompanied by incidents of speech such as signs and literature explaining the protest, for which proper city permits have been obtained. (Ord. of 8 -5 -2002, 1, Doc. #020805701) CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA §10 -611. Sidewalk Behavior. (1) Scope. The provisions of this Section shall apply as follows: (a) The following provisions shall apply city-wide: Subsections ...(2)(i), relating to the sale of goods or services, or solicitation of funds, on the highway; [(2)(i) Sell or offer for sale any goods, wares or services, or solicit funds for any purpose, in or on the public highway, except for licensed vendors.] (b) The following provisions shall apply only in the zones designated by Council:.. (2)(g), relating to lying on the sidewalk; (2)(h), relating to sitting on the sidewalk.. (4)(a), (b) and (c), relating to aggressive solicitation; (4) Aggressive Conduct on the Sidewalk Prohibited. No person shall: (a) Solicit money for any purpose on the public sidewalk in an aggressive manner, or accompanied by conduct, including but not limited to repeated begging, insistent panhandling, retaliatory comments, blockage of free passage of a pedestrian, touching or yelling at a pedestrian, confrontation or intimidation, which is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear bodily harm to oneself or another, or damage to or loss of property. (b) Solicit money for any purpose on the public sidewalk in any manner, within an eight foot (8 radius of any building entrance, or within an eight foot (8 radius of any vending cart. (c) Solicit money for any purpose on the public sidewalk in any manner, within a twenty foot (20 radius of any bank entrance or any automatic teller machine. 7) Enforcement. (a) No law enforcement officer shall issue a notice of violation or take any coercive action against any person in violation of this Section, unless, prior to issuing such notice or taking such action, the officer or his or her designated representative: (.1) With respect to violations of subsections (2)(g), (h), (1) or (m), relating to lying, sitting, obstructing, or leaving objects unattended, or (4)(b) or (c), relating to soliciting near a building entrance or bank, first issues an oral warning to the person or persons in violation, and then, if the person or persons refuse to comply after receiving an oral warning, issues a written warning to the person or persons in violation. The written warning shall be printed in English and Spanish. (.2) With respect to violations of subsections (2)(g), (h), (1) or (m), or (4), attempts to ascertain whether the person is in need of medical assistance or social service assistance CITY OF RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA Sec. 12 -1026. SOLICITING BUSINESS OR EMPLOYMENT. (a) Business. It shall be unlawful for any person to solicit or attempt to solicit business of any kind on the streets or sidewalks of the City (b) Employment near Nash Square. Loitering for the purpose of seeking employment or the seeking thereof or the solicitation by any prospective employer of any person for hire within or upon any of the streets or sidewalks contiguous to Nash Square is declared to be a public nuisance and such practices are prohibited. (c) Employment, generally. Loitering for the purpose of seeking employment or the seeking thereof or the solicitation by any prospective employer of any person for hire 39 135 within or upon any of the streets or sidewalks of the City is declared to be a public nuisance and such practices are prohibited. (d) Approaching motor vehicles. No person shall stand, sit, or loiter in the right -of- way of any streets in the City with the intent to approach any motor vehicle for the purpose of soliciting employment, business or contribution from the driver or occupant of the motor vehicle; provided, that the provisions of this section shall not apply to licensees, employees or contractors of the Department of Transportation or City employees engaged in construction or maintenance or in making traffic or engineering surveys. CITY OF RENO, NEVADA Sec. 8.12.025. Aggressive or fraudulent solicitation prohibited. (a) The following definitions apply in this section: (1) "Aggressive manner" means: a. Approaching, speaking to, or following a person in a manner as would cause a reasonable person to fear bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon the person, or upon property in the person's immediate possession; b. Touching another person without that person's consent in the course of soliciting; c. By following behind, ahead or alongside, blocking the path of, or continuing to solicit a person who walks or drives away from the person soliciting or who gives notice or demonstrates verbally or physically that such solicitation is offensive, unwelcome or that the solicitation should cease; d. Intentionally blocking or interfering with the safe or free passage of a person or vehicle by any means, including unreasonably causing a person or a driver to take evasive action to avoid physical contact; or e. By using profane or abusive language or gestures either during the solicitation or following a refusal, or making any statement, gesture or other communication that would cause a reasonable person to be fearful or would be reasonably perceived as a threat. (2) `Invite" means to request someone's presence or participation. (3) "Obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic" means to walk, stand, sit, lie or place an object in such a manner as to block passage by another person or a vehicle, or to require another person or a driver of a vehicle to take evasive action to avoid physical contact. Acts authorized as an exercise of one's constitutional right to picket or to legally protest, participation in a legal event such as watching a parade or a special event and acts authorized by a permit or license issued pursuant to the Reno Municipal Code, shall not constitute obstruction of pedestrian or vehicular traffic. (4) "Public place" means an area open to the general public, whether publicly or privately owned, and includes alleys, bridges, buildings, driveways, parking lots, parking garages, parks, plazas, sidewalks, streets, any public transportation vehicle and the doorways and entrances to buildings or dwellings and the grounds enclosing them. (5) "Solicit" means and includes any request, offer, enticement or action which announces the availability for employment, the sale of goods or services, or a request for money or other property. (6) "Night" is defined as the period from one hour after sunset to sunrise. (b) A person is guilty of aggressive solicitation if, in a public place, he or she intentionally: (1) Obstructs pedestrian or vehicular traffic for the purpose of soliciting from pedestrian(s) or occupant(s) of vehicles; (2) Solicits in an aggressive manner; (3) Solicits within 20 feet of any automatic teller machine (ATM); 40 I (4) Approaches the occupant of any vehicle for the purpose of soliciting without being invited; (5) Solicits in any public parking lot during the night; (6) Solicits in any public transportation vehicle or within ten feet of any designated or posted transportation vehicle stop; or (7) Solicits in any indoor or outdoor dining area without being invited. (c) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly make a false or misleading representation in the course of soliciting a donation. False or misleading representations include, but are not limited to the following: (1) Stating that the donation is needed to meet a specific need, when the person soliciting already has sufficient funds to meet that need and does not disclose that fact; (2) Stating that the donation is needed to meet a need that does not exist; (3) Stating that the person soliciting is from out of town and stranded, or that he or she is homeless when that is not true; (4) Stating or representing that the person soliciting is a member of a military service when the person soliciting is neither a present nor a former member of a military service; or (5) Stating or representing that the person soliciting suffers from a mental or physical disability or deformity when the person soliciting does not suffer the disability or deformity indicated. (d) Penalties. Any person convicted under this section shall be punished for a misdemeanor. (Ord. No. 4372, 1, 3 -8 -94; Ord. No. 4838, 2,1-27-98; Ord. No. 5377, 1, 10- 22 -02; Ord. No. 5741, 1, 9- 14 -05) Sec. 8.12.026. Soliciting without invitation. The practice of going in and upon private premises, grounds, residences, business establishments or offices in the city by solicitors, peddlers, hawkers, itinerant merchants or transient vendors of goods, wares or merchandise, without first having been requested or invited so to do by the owner or occupant of the private residence, grounds, premises, business establishment or office for the purpose of soliciting orders for any purpose whatsoever, or for the purpose of selling, disposing, peddling or hawking goods, wares or merchandise, is unlawful. (Ord. No. 4647, 1, 7 -9 -96) CITY OF ROCHESTER, NEW YORK Aggressive Panhandling (Added 5 -18 -2004 by Ord. No. 2004- 142]Code 44-4 A. Legislative intent. This legislation is adopted in order to protect persons from threatening, intimidating or harassing behavior, to keep public places safe and attractive for use by all members of the community and to maintain and preserve public places where all of the community can interact in a peaceful manner. This legislation is also intended to provide for the free flow of pedestrian and vehicular traffic on streets and sidewalks in the City, to promote tourism and business and preserve the quality of urban life. The Council finds that aggressive acts associated with solicitation tend to interfere with the free flow of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and intimidate persons in public places, and can lead to disruption and disorder in public places. Aggressive acts can also cause persons to avoid public places and lead to declining patronage of commercial establishments and tourism. The Council further finds that solicitation in certain public places is inconsistent with the use of those places, is inherently intimidating, targets persons who are captive audiences or constitutes an invasion of privacy as persons are not able to simply move on if they do not wish to speak to the person soliciting. Solicitation in proximity to bank entrances or check cashing businesses or automated 41 137 teller machines is inherently intimidating and should be restricted. By this legislation, the Council intends to promote the health, safety and welfare of the citizens and visitors to the City. B. Definitions. Whenever the following words and phrases are used in this section, they shall have the following meanings: AGGRESSIVE MANNER: 1) Intentionally or recklessly making any physical contact with or touching another person in the course of the solicitation, or approaching within an arm's length of the person, except with the person's consent; 2) Following the person being solicited, if that conduct is: (a) Intended to or is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon property in the person's possession; or b) Is intended to or is reasonably likely to intimidate the person being solicited into responding affirmatively to the solicitation; (3) Continuing to solicit within five feet of the person being solicited after the person has made a negative response, if continuing the solicitation is: a) Intended to or is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon property in the person's possession; or b) Is intended to or is reasonably likely to intimidate the person being solicited into responding affirmatively to the solicitation; (4) Intentionally or recklessly blocking the safe or free passage of the person being solicited or requiring the person, or the driver of a vehicle, to take evasive action to avoid physical contact with the person making the solicitation; (5) Intentionally or recklessly using words: (a) Intended to or is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon property in the person's possession; or b) Is intended to or is reasonably likely to intimidate the person being solicited into responding affirmatively to the solicitation; (6) Approaching the person being solicited in a manner that is: (a) Intended to or is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear imminent bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon property in the person's possession; or b) Is intended to or is reasonably likely to intimidate the person being solicited into responding affirmatively to the solicitation; AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE A device, linked to a financial institution's account records, which is able to carry out transactions, including but not limited to account transfers, deposits, cash withdrawals, balance inquiries, and mortgage and loan payments. AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE FACILITY The area comprised of one or more automated teller machines, and any adjacent space which is made available to banking customers after regular banking hours. BANKING ORGANIZATION All banks, trust companies, private bankers, savings banks, industrial banks, safe deposit companies, savings and loan associations, credit unions and investment companies as defined in 2 of the New York State Banking Law, LICENSED CASHER OF CHECKS Any individual, partnership, unincorporated association or corporation duly licensed by the New York State Superintendent of Banks to engage in business pursuant to the provisions of Article IX -A of the New York State Banking Law. PARKING GARAGE As defined in 111 -117 of the Municipal Code, and including the Metro Center Garage. PARKING STATION --A municipal parking lot as defined in 111 -103 of the Municipal Code. 42 138 PUBLIC PLACE Any area or building owned, leased, operated or controlled by or on behalf of any government, municipality, public authority or public corporation in the City which is generally accessible by the public, including but not limited to any street, including the sidewalk portion thereof, skyway, bridge, tunnel, park, playground, recreation area, cemetery, school or school grounds, building, facility, driveway, parking lot or parking garage, and the doorways and entrances to buildings and dwellings. SOLICIT Shall include, without limitation, the spoken, written, or printed word or such other acts or bodily gestures as are conducted in furtherance of the purposes of immediately obtaining money or any other thing of value. C. No person shall solicit in an aggressive manner in a public place. D. No person shall solicit within 20 feet of an automated teller machine or an entrance or exit of an automated teller machine facility during the time the automated teller machine is available for customers' use; or within 20 feet of an entrance or exit to a banking organization or a licensed casher of checks during its business hours. E. No person shall solicit when either the person soliciting or the person being solicited is in a bus shelter or at a bus stop. F. No person shall solicit in a parking garage or parking station. G. No person shall solicit in any portion of a public skyway or tunnel. H. No person on a sidewalk or alongside a roadway shall solicit from any occupant of a motor vehicle that is on a street or other public place. 1. Penalties. A violation of this section shall be a "violation" as that term in defined in the Penal Law. A person convicted of violating this section shall be fined not less than $25 nor more than $250, and, in addition, for a second conviction within 12 months of a preceding conviction, may be imprisoned for a term not longer than 15 days. In lieu of a fine, the court may impose an appropriate alternative sentence; provided, however, that an alternative sentence shall not be an unconditional discharge. J. Severability. if any provision of this section is declared invalid or unconstitutional for any reason, the remaining provisions shall be severable and shall continue in full force and effect. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 5.116.190 Puroose. It is the intent of this article to impose reasonable place limitations on solicitation, as defined herein, in order to protect the safety of the general public while respecting the constitutional right of free speech. (Ord. 98 -014 2 (part): prior code 10.06.800) 5.116.200 Definitions. As used in this article, the following terms have the meanings respectively ascribed to them: "Business" means any type of product, goods, service, performance or activity which is provided or performed, or offered to be provided or performed, in exchange for money, labor, goods or any other form of consideration. "Employment" means services, industry or labor performed by a person for wages or other compensation or under any contract of hire, written, oral, express or implied. "Freeway" means any divided arterial highway for through traffic with full control of access, uninterrupted by private roads and intersecting streets. "Highway" means any way or place of whatever nature, publicly maintained and open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel. "Highway" includes streets. "Median" means that concrete portion of a divided highway separating the traveled ways for traffic in opposite directions. "Off- ramp" means any public roadway providing vehicular access from a freeway. 43 W e "On- ramp" means any public roadway providing vehicular access to a freeway. "Solicit" means to make a request, offer, enticement, or action which announces the availability for or of employment, or a request for money or other property, or to make a request, offer, enticement or action which seeks to purchase or secure goods or employment, or to receive a contribution of money or other property. A solicitation shall be deemed complete when made whether or not an actual employment relationship is created, a transaction is completed, or an exchange of money or other property takes place. (Ord. 98 -014 2 (part): prior code 10.06.801) 5.116.210 Prohibited solicitation. It is unlawful for any person on any median, on -ramp, off -ramp or area immediately adjacent thereto, to solicit or attempt to solicit employment, business or contributions of money or other property from any person traveling in a vehicle along a public right -of -way, including but not limited to public streets, highways or driveways. (Ord. 98 -014 2 (part): prior code 10.06.802) 5.116.220 Violation Penaltv. Any person violating Section 5.116.210 of this chapter is guilty of an infraction. (Ord. 98 -014 2 (part): prior code 10.06.803) 5.116.230 Nonexclusivitv. Nothing in this article shall limit or preclude the enforcement of other applicable laws. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA Sec. 20 -79. Panhandling. (a) Definitions. (1) Panhandling means any solicitation made in person requesting an immediate donation of money or other thing of value for oneself or another person or entity. Purchase of an item for an amount far exceeding its value, under circumstances where a reasonable person would understand that the purchase is, in substance, a donation, is a donation for the purpose of this section. Panhandling shall not include the act of passively standing or sitting, performing music,or singing with a sign or other indication that a donation is being sought but without any vocal request other than a response to an inquiry by another person. (2) Prohibited zone means any of the following designated areas or rights -of -way (including sidewalks), which generally are shown on Diagram 1: [STREET LISTINGS DELETED] [LINK TO GRAPH DELETED] (3) Aggressive panhandling means: a. To approach or speak to a person in such a manner as would cause a reasonable person to believe that the person is being threatened with: 1. Imminent bodily injury; or 2. The commission of a criminal act upon the person or another person, or upon property in the person's immediate possession; b. To persist in panhandling after the person solicited has given a negative response; c. To block, either individually or as part of a group of persons, the passage of a solicited person; d. To touch a solicited person; or e. To engage in conduct that would reasonably be construed as intended to intimidate, compel or force a solicited person to accede to demands. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in an act of panhandling when either the panhandler or the person being solicited is located in, on, or at any of the following locations: 44 140 (1) Prohibited zone; (2) Bus stop; (3) The bus transfer facility located at 3180 Central Avenue; (4) Public transportation vehicle; (5) Sidewalk cafe; (6) Area within 15 feet (in any direction) of an automatic teller machine or entrance to a bank; or (7) Private property, unless the panhandler has permission from the owner of such property. (c) It shall be unlawful to engage in an act of panhandling on any day after sunset or before sunrise. (d) It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in an act of aggressive panhandling. (Code 1973, 20- 32(a), (b); Ord. No. 199 -G, 2, 6 -8 -95; Ord. No. 532 -G, 1, 4- 18 -02) CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA (Appendix 69 to City Code. Proposition M, Adopted, November 4, 20031 120 -2. AGGRESSIVE SOLICITATION BAN/ SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH DIVERSION PROGRAM. (a) Findings. The people of San Francisco find that the problems of aggressive and improper solicitation are among the most difficult and vexing faced by the City and that prior approaches mostly have failed. The people of San Francisco find that aggressive solicitation for money in public and private places threatens residents' and visitors' safety, privacy and quality of life. San Franciscans seek policies that preserve citizens' right to enjoy public spaces free from fear and harassment while protecting the free speech rights of individuals and groups, permitting appropriate and safe commercial activities of street artisans, performers and merchants and providing for the basic needs of indigent and vulnerable populations. Where appropriate, San Franciscans also seek to establish policies and programs that limit the ability of indigent and homeless substance abusers to use cash contributions for the purchase of alcohol and illegal drugs. The people of San Francisco find that the City's existing laws regulating panhandling and solicitation are outdated and unenforceable as a result of numerous court decisions and criminalize violators instead of diverting them to screening and assessment for eligibility in drug and alcohol dependency and mental health treatment programs. The people of San Francisco find that people who aggressively or improperly solicit because of drug or alcohol dependency or mental illness should be diverted from the criminal court system to a program of screening, assessment and referral operated by the San Francisco Department of Public Health. (b) Goals. This section: (1) replaces prior bans on panhandling, restrictions on aggressive solicitation, and solicitation near automatic teller machines (ATMs) rendered unenforceable by court rulings with a new aggressive solicitation prohibition; (2) establishes new specific prohibitions on solicitation near ATM machines, near residential property, in parking lots, on median strips and near freeway offramps and on the Municipal Railway and the BART system; (3) establishes a requirement that, as appropriate, violators of this ordinance be diverted from the criminal justice system to a screening and assessment program to identify candidates for alcohol and drug dependency treatment and mental health services administered by the Department of Public Health in order to clear their citations. (c) Definitions For purposes of this section: 1. "Aggressive manner" shall mean: 45 141 A. Approaching or speaking to a person, or following a person before, during or after soliciting if that conduct is intended or is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear bodily harm to oneself or to another, or damage to or loss of property or otherwise be intimidated into giving money or other thing of value; B. Continuing to solicit from a person after the person has given a negative response to such soliciting; C. Intentionally touching or causing physical contact with another person without that person's consent in the course of soliciting; D. Intentionally blocking or interfering with the safe or free passage of a pedestrian or vehicle by any means, including unreasonably causing a pedestrian or vehicle operator to take evasive action to avoid physical contact; E. Using violent or threatening gestures toward a person solicited; or, F. Following the person being solicited, with the intent of asking that person for money or other things of value. 2. "Soliciting" shall mean asking for money or objects of value, with the intention that the money or object be transferred at that time, and at that place. Soliciting shall include using the spoken, written, or printed word, bodily gestures, signs, or other means with the purpose of obtaining an immediate donation of money or other thing of value or soliciting the sale of goods or services. 3. "Public place" shall mean a place where a governmental entity has title, to which the public or a substantial group of persons has access, including but not limited to any street, highway, parking lot, plaza, transportation facility, school, place of amusement, park, or playground. 4. "Check cashing business" shall mean any person duly licensed by the Attorney General to engage in the business of cashing checks, drafts or money orders for consideration pursuant to Section 1789.31 of the California Civil Code. 5. "Automated teller machine" shall mean a device, linked to a financial institution's account records, which is able to carry out transactions, including, but not limited to: account transfers, deposits, cash withdrawals, balance inquiries, and mortgage and loan payments. 6. "Automated teller machine facility" shall mean the area comprised of one or more automatic teller machines, and any adjacent space that is made available to banking customers after regular banking hours. (d) Prohibited acts 1. No person shall solicit in an aggressive manner in any public place. 2. No person shall solicit within twenty feet of any entrance or exit of any check cashing business or within twenty feet of any automated teller machine without the consent of the owner of the property or another person legally in possession of such facilities. Provided, however, that when an automated teller machine is located within an automated teller machine facility, such distance shall be measured from the entrance or exit of the facility. 3. No person shall solicit an operator or other occupant of a motor vehicle while such vehicle is located on any street or highway on -ramp or off -ramp, for the purpose of performing or offering to perform a service in connection with such vehicle or otherwise soliciting donations or the sale of goods or services. Provided, however, that this paragraph shall not apply to services rendered in connection with emergency repairs requested by the operator or passenger of such vehicle. 4. No person shall solicit in any public transportation vehicle, or in any public or private parking lot or structure. 5. Before any law enforcement officer may cite or arrest a person under this ordinance, the officer must warn the person that his or her conduct is in violation of this ordinance 46 MIA and must give the person an opportunity to comply with the provisions of this ordinance. (e) Penalties Any person violating any provision of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor or an infraction. The complaint charging such violation shall specify whether the violation is a misdemeanor or infraction, which decision shall be that of the District Attorney. If charged as an infraction, upon conviction, the violator shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $50, or by attending a screening, assessment and diversion program designed and administered by the Department of Public Health and approved by the San Francisco Public Health Commission to identify candidates for drug and alcohol dependency counseling and treatment and mental health services. If charged as a misdemeanor, upon conviction, the violator shall be punished by a fine of not less than $50 or more than $100, and /or by attending a screening, assessment and diversion program designed and administered by the Department of Public Health and approved by the San Francisco Public Health Commission to identify candidates for drug and alcohol dependency counseling and treatment and mental health services. Any person guilty of violating this ordinance three or more times in a twelve month period shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be fined not less than $300 or more than $500, and/or referred to a screening, assessment and diversion program designed and administered by the Department of Public Health and approved by the San Francisco Public Health Commission to identify candidates for drug and alcohol dependency counseling and treatment and mental health services, and /or referred to a community service assignment, or imprisoned in the county jail for a period no longer than three months. (f) Diversion Program The Director of Public Health shall establish, administer and /or certify the assessment and screening programs set forth in subsection (e) of this section and shall establish guidelines for determining whether and under what circumstances violators may be eligible to participate in diversion programs. In addition, the Department of Public Health shall establish, administer and /or certify diversion programs appropriate for treatment of violators, and shall establish guidelines for determining whether the conditions of diversion have been satisfied. All rules and guidelines governing the diversion program shall be established by the Director of Public Health subject to the approval of the San Francisco Health Commission not later than six months after the Board of Supervisors has declared the results of the election at which this measure is passed. Individuals who are referred for treatment but fail to participate in such treatment shall be subject to the other penalties set forth in subsection (e) of this section. (g) Effective Date This law shall become effective six months after the Board of Supervisors has declared the results of the election at which this measure is passed. (h) Severability If any section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this law is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, it shall in no way affect the validity of any remaining portions of this law. CITY OF SEATTLE, WASHINGTON SMC 12A.12.016 Pedestrian interference. A. The following definitions apply in this section: 1. "Aggressively beg" means to beg with the intent to intimidate another person into giving money or goods. 2. "intimidate" means to engage in conduct which would make a reasonable person fearful or feel compelled. 47 143 3. "Beg" means to ask for money or goods as a charity, whether by words, bodily gestures, signs, or other means. 4. "Obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic" means to walk, stand, sit, lie, or place an object in such a manner as to block passage by another person or a vehicle, or to require another person or a driver of a vehicle to take evasive action to avoid physical contact. Acts authorized as an exercise of one's constitutional right to picket or to legally protest, and acts authorized by a permit issued pursuant to the Street Use Ordinance, Chapters 15.02 through 15.50 of the Seattle Municipal Code, shall not constitute obstruction of pedestrian or vehicular traffic. 5. "Public place" means an area generally visible to public view and includes alleys, bridges, buildings, driveways, parking lots, parks, plazas, sidewalks and streets open to the general public, including those that serve food or drink or provide entertainment, and the doorways and entrances to buildings or dwellings and the grounds enclosing them. B. A person is guilty of pedestrian interference if, in a public place, he or she intentionally: 1. Obstructs pedestrian or vehicular traffic; or 2. Aggressively begs. C. Pedestrian interference is a misdemeanor. SMC 15.48.040 Sitting or lying down on public sidewalks in downtown and neighborhood commercial zones. A. Prohibition. No person shall sit or lie down upon a public sidewalk, or upon a blanket, chair, stool, or any other object placed upon a public sidewalk, during the hours between seven a.m. (7:00 a.m.) and nine p.m. (9:00 p.m.) in the following zones: 1. The Downtown Zone, defined as the area bounded by the Puget Sound waterfront on the west, South Jackson Street on the south, Interstate 5 on the East, and Denny Way and Broad Street on the North; 2. Neighborhood Commercial Zones, defined as areas zoned as Pioneer Square Mixed (PSM), International District Mixed (IDM), Commercial 1 (C1), Commercial 2 (C2), Neighborhood Commercial 1 (NCI), Neighborhood Commercial 2 (NC2), and Neighborhood Commercial 3 (NC3). B. Exceptions. The prohibition in subsection A shall not apply to any person: 1. Sifting or lying down on a public sidewalk due to a medical emergency; 2. Who, as the result of a disability, utilizes a wheelchair, walker, or similar device to move about the public sidewalk; 3. Operating or patronizing a commercial establishment conducted on the public sidewalk pursuant to a street use permit; or a person participating in or attending a parade, festival, performance, rally, demonstration, meeting, or similar event conducted on the public sidewalk pursuant to a street use or other applicable permit; 4. Sitting on a chair or bench located on the public sidewalk which is supplied by a public agency or by the abutting private property owner; 5. Sifting on a public sidewalk within a bus stop zone while waiting for public or private transportation. Nothing in any of these exceptions shall be construed to permit any conduct which is prohibited by SMC Section 12A.12.015, Pedestrian interference. C. No person shall be cited under this section unless the person engages in conduct prohibited by this section after having been notified by a law enforcement officer that the conduct violates this section. 48 ME CITY OF SPOKANE, WASHINGTON Spokane Code 10.10.025: Pedestrian Interference. A. Consistent with the findings of other Washington State cities, the city council finds that it is important to the general welfare of the citizens and residents of the city to protect and preserve the public safety of pedestrians and to insure the safe and efficient movement of pedestrian and vehicular traffic in public places. The city council further finds that public places as defined in this section serve the primary purpose of enabling pedestrian and vehicular traffic to safely and efficiently move about from place to place and that public places in the urban core have become increasingly congested and should be maintained to serve their primary purpose. Spokane, as well as other cities in Washington, has experienced an increase in the number of incidents of aggressive solicitation by individuals towards pedestrians and that pedestrian interference in public places deteriorates from the primary purpose and threatens public health, safety and welfare. The city has a compelling interest in protecting its citizens from threatening, intimidating or harassing behavior caused by aggressive solicitations, in preserving the quality of life in its urban center and in protecting and preserving the public health, safety and welfare. B. The following definitions apply in this section: 1. "Aggressively solicit" means to solicit with the intent to intimidate another person into giving money or goods regardless of the solicitors purpose or intended use of the money or goods. 2. "Intimidate" means to engage in conduct which would make a reasonable person fearful of imminent harm to his or her person or property or feel threatened. 3. "Solicit" means to ask for money or goods whether by words, bodily gestures, signs or other means. 4. "Obstruct pedestrian or vehicular traffic" means to walk, stand, sit, lie or place an object in such manner as to obstruct or impede, or a person of ordinary sensibilities would conclude it tends to obstruct or impede, the free passage of pedestrians and/or vehicles through the area; or that requires, or would require, evasive action by a pedestrian and /or vehicle to avoid physical contact. If the impediment or obstruction is caused by the size of a particular group of persons, all persons within the group are equally subject to this section. Acts authorized as an exercise of one's constitutional rights, and acts authorized by an obstruction permit issued pursuant to SMC Sections 11.02.03458.D, 12.02.0706 or 12.02.0730 do not constitute obstruction of pedestrian or vehicular traffic. 5. "Public place" means an area generally visible to public view and includes alleys, bridges, buildings, driveways, parking lots, parks, plazas, sidewalks and streets open to the general public, including those that serve food or drink or provide entertainment, and the doors and entrances to buildings or dwellings and the grounds enclosing them. C. A person is guilty of pedestrian interference if, in a public place, he or she knowingly: 1. obstructs pedestrian or vehicular traffic, or 2. aggressively solicits. D. Pedestrian interference is a misdemeanor. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance does not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. 49 145 WASHINGTON, D.C. 22 -2301. 1) "Aggressive manner" means: A) Approaching, speaking to, or following a person in a manner as would cause a reasonable person to fear bodily harm or the commission of a criminal act upon the person, or upon property in the person's immediate possession; B) Touching another person without that person's consent in the course of asking for alms; C) Continuously asking, begging, or soliciting alms from a person after the person has made a negative response; or D) Intentionally blocking or interfering with the safe or free passage of a person by any means, including unreasonably causing a person to take evasive action to avoid physical contact. 2) "Ask, beg, or solicit alms" includes the spoken, written, or printed word or such other act conducted for the purpose of obtaining an immediate donation of money or thing of value. 22 -2302. Prohibited acts. a) No person may ask, beg, or solicit alms, including money and other things of value,. in an aggressive manner in any place open to the general public, including sidewalks, streets, alleys, driveways, parking lots, parks, plazas, buildings, doorways and entrances to buildings, and gasoline service stations, and the grounds enclosing buildings. b) No person may ask, beg, or solicit alms in any public transportation vehicle; or at any bus, train, or subway station or stop. c) No person may ask, beg, or solicit alms within 10 feet of any automatic teller machine (ATM). d) No person may ask, beg, or solicit alms from any operator or occupant of a motor vehicle that is in traffic on a public street. e) No person may ask, beg, or solicit alms from any operator or occupant of a motor vehicle on a public street in exchange for blocking, occupying, or reserving a public parking space, or directing the operator or occupant to a public parking space. f) No person may ask, beg, or solicit alms in exchange for cleaning motor vehicle windows while the vehicle is in traffic on a public street. g) No person may ask, beg, or solicit alms in exchange for protecting, watching, washing, cleaning, repairing, or painting a motor vehicle or bicycle while it is parked on a public street. h) No person may ask, beg, or solicit alms on private property or residential property, without permission from the owner or occupant. 22 -2303. Permitted activity. Acts authorized as an exercise of a person's constitutional right to picket, protest, or speak, and acts authorized by a permit issued by the District of Columbia government shall not constitute unlawful activity under this chapter. 22 -2304. Penalties. a) Any person convicted of violating any provision of 22 -2302 shall be fined not more than $300 or be imprisoned not more than 90 days or both. b) In lieu of or in addition to the penalty provided in subsection (a) of this section, a person convicted of violating any provision of 22 -2302 may be required to perform community service as provided in 16 -712. 22 -2305. Conduct of prosecutions. Prosecutions for violations of this chapter shall be conducted in the name of the District of Columbia by the Corporation Counsel, 22 -2306. Disclosure. Any arrest or conviction under this chapter shall be disclosed to public and private social service agencies that request the Metropolitan Police.Department or the court to be notified of such events. 50 IT F. CITY OF WILMINGTON, DELAWARE Article VII. Offenses involving regulations of panhandling and fraudulent solicitation Sec. 36 -221. Definitions. For purposes of this article and the sections thereof, "panhandling" is defined as any solicitation made in person requesting an immediate donation of money. Purchase of an item for an amount far exceeding its value, under circumstances where a reasonable person would understand that the purchase is in substance a donation, is a donation for the purposes of this article. Panhandling does not include passively standing or sitting with a sign or other indication that one is seeking donations, without addressing any solicitation to any specific person other than in response to an inquiry by that person. (Ord. No. 94- 073(sub 1), 1, 12 -1 -94) Sec. 36 -222. Time of panhandling. Any person who panhandles after sunset or before sunrise is guilty of a violation of this article of this chapter of the city Code. (Ord. No. 94- 073(sub 1), 1, 12 -1 -94) Sec. 36 -223. Place of panhandling. Any person who panhandles when the person solicited is in any of the following places is guilty of a violation of this article: (1) At any bus stop or train stop; (2) In any public transportation vehicle or facility; (3) In any vehicle on any city street; or (4) On private property, unless the panhandler has permission from the owner or the occupant. (Ord. No. 94- 073(sub 1), 1, 12 -1 -94) Sec. 36 -224. Manner of panhandling. Any person who panhandles in any of the following manners is guilty of a violation of this article: (1) By coming within three feet of the person solicited until that person has indicated that he or she does wish to make a donation; (2) By blocking the path of the person soliciting along a sidewalk or street; (3) By following a person who walks away from the panhandler; (4) By using profane or abusive language, either during the solicitation or following a refusal; (5) By panhandling in a group of two or more persons; or (6) By any statement, gesture, or other communication which a reasonable person in the situation of the person solicited would perceive to be a threat. (Ord. No. 94- 073(sub 1), 1, 12 -1 -94) Sec. 36 -225. False of misleading solicitation. Any person who knowingly makes any false or misleading representation in the course of soliciting a donation is guilty of a violation of this article. False or misleading representations include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) Stating that the donation is needed to meet a specific need, when the solicitor already has sufficient funds to meet that need and does not disclose that fact; (2) Stating that the donation is needed to meet a need which does not exist; (3) Stating that the solicitor is from out of town and stranded, when that is not true; (4) Wearing a military uniform or other indication of military service, when the solicitor is neither a present nor former member of the service indicated; (5) Wearing or displaying an indication of physical disability, when the solicitor does not suffer the disability indicated; (6) Use of any make -up or device to simulate any deformity; or (7) Stating that the solicitor is homeless, when he is not. 51 147 (Ord. No. 94- 073(sub 1), 1, 12 -1 -94) Sec. 36 -226. Permit requirement. (a) No person shall panhandle on five or more days in a single calendar year without a permit issued by the police department. A person who has been issued a permit shall keep it on his or her person at all times while panhandling and show it to any police officer upon request. No person whose permit has been revoked shall panhandle for a permit of two years following the revocation. Any person who violates this subsection is guilty of a violation of this article. (b) The police department shall issue the permit, without fee, to any eligible person who presents himself at the public safety building, states his true name, presents a photo identification or signs a declaration under penalty of perjury that he has no such identification, and permits himself to be photographed and fingerprinted. (c) A person is ineligible for a permit if and only if within the past five years he (1) has been convicted of two or more violations of this article, (2) has had a permit revoked pursuant to subsections (e) or (f) of this section, or (3) has been convicted of two or more offenses under the law of any jurisdiction which involve aggressive or intimidating behavior while panhandling or false or misleading representations while panhandling. (d) If the police department is unable to determine eligibility within 24 hours of the application, the department shall issue a permit good for 30 days and determine eligibility for a regular permit before the temporary permit expires. The regular permit shall expire three years from the date of issuance. Along with the permit, the police department shall give the applicant a copy of this article. (e) Any person who makes any false or misleading representation while apply for a period under this section is guilty of a violation of this article. Upon conviction of violation of this subsection, the police department shall revoke any permit issued to the subject defendant under this section. (f) If a permit is issued to a person under this section and that person subsequently commits and is convicted of a violation of any provision of this article, the police department shall revoke the permit. (Ord. No. 94- 073(sub 1), 1, 12 -1 -94) Sec. 36 -227. Violations; penalties. Each section of this article is distinct and any violation of any section is a separate violation of this article. A conviction of a violation of any section of this article shall be punishable by a fine in an amount not to exceed $500.00. (Ord. No. 94- 073(sub 1), 1, 12 -1 -94) 52 a) CA N CL 149 L L O N 0 `o a w d SO E G C g N o� L E O N a 0 c m a 0 r m O N a m E L N L C7 N C C a N U N en Y O Z L U (a X C4 m a.E N 7 Q Eq-0 0 2 Q) ,N OQ ❑g 'O X m O a) C .N 0. CL0 O 0 7+ la S� C t3 C L .2 E c ca a _U E 2 t c d� a (a 0 c M� o w N 3 C L ti CL L E L o L 0 L a, 0 3 0 to L. n d d N M c N c O C C N C d .L C a) 3 N 0 C E Q O� U V E O v 0 0 a� o m E a E C o ca E p L C n$ E o o.0 E a) C E C `o o y m 3 07 o 0 a 73 N aaLoo'D> n co a—a�io't>N_ h Q 2 0 2 zaL, m o g C7 o g c 2 u1 E L ca s �o m CV E N o N L O o L o o U d Q on c c 0 c Z C cc p a) 0 L 7 mcao o U q E E m N o N c y N a d a C a aC o a) o O N Q 2 Q E v_ L c L C L L C C o L C C 4 L C C 4) o a y N, N v U 0 N X Q E [n a) a) d N N 0 O N 't3 0 N O j Cp L OL ca CT O ca U T d a) 7 CS Q d .N �6 to .N ca cr O '52 q as moon CAE X30 oog�3og JO02 Y ooag N L C 00 c 0 N r V L c p L c N Q) N N Ql in O m N co N 0 ,a 2 c c ca o f v m 0 m m w N is l0 E 0 E a� m m 111 a) E 7 U a Q (n C f ❑2 N f�11 JE C O 0 L 0 F N o L o L o C6 CL C 0 N U a) C cis Q a) co w 0 O 0 cV 0 111 U 0. u c a 'U 2 C o C u) O N C O 1 C O C 0 aa`a) c 0 N N N C3 "O to 'D o "O (a •N N A O N 0 0) C7 d2 L�2 T2 ag L O U t N E E L U Og O O c c c c c c p N CV O N 1 N p 0) c N O N m 0 CL O c E N E O E E p U E N E N v E C fi a N O -0 0 a) 0 to 6 4 0 a. lea N CY]•O c52 CO N C72 O y 22 a) C N N L Q'2J't3 m2 to N 02 C y N N Ja ng O c c N f6 (D C Q� co C C m -1 C13 (C3 1 �o C 2- d E wE OE NE 2 as�� Q a m� C? 2� o o 3 N M LO cD ti co a) CA N CL 149 1 a p E6 as� .n w m aim o v`� c v L v s t6 _,E O y O N N N C RS N N'p F) 00 7 .a 7 G a C G ~O 1% O N N N r N I p 7 Q O T `r t C N O Q� t X N E co 'A Z: N N Kl J(01> N'G o O a p a a I CM N 0 5 L CD v j In U" c N �l o a CL i c a i a e Z i E G t N C7 U w N O c c V a CD a N' c d a N o C ca E N c� Q i a e Z i E G t t N t a i 61) co V7 -O 41 E N N ai E T o r a 0 d) o E V N Z 3- I O G N Q�-; G N E N 5 U w N o Vvcoc co y �ayE O. Q t N t a i 61) co V7 -O 41 E N N ai E T o r a 0 d) o E V N Z 3- I O G N Q�-; G N a G 6 N Ll -cs G Q 6 G Z 7 N 0 c V G N x 2 1 2 7' 2 tO k k 0 ƒ �O \2 \2*tak k k k f A 0 f a k 0: k� /�S���k� r� k�7 �7k 0 �o 3$� 1 2 7' 2 tO k k 0 ƒ �O 0 0 k�\\ g\ U') t i5 t _CD w 6 \»R° »�E� co jr- k to k�7 �7k 0 3$� 0 0 k�\\ g\ U') t i5 t _CD w 6 \»R° »�E� co jr- k 152 City of Tukwila Community Affairs and Parks Committee COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PARKS COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes November 14, 2011— 5:00 p.m.; Conference Room #3 PRESENT Councilmembers: De'Sean Quinn, Acting Chair; Joe Duffie and Allan Ekberg (filling in for Verna Seal) Staff: Shelley Kerslake, David Cline and Kimberly Matej CALL TO ORDER: Acting Committee Chair Quinn called the meeting to order at 5:02 p.m. I. PRESENTATIONS No presentations. II. BUSINESS AGENDA A. Ordinance: Anti Panhandling At Mayor Haggerton's direction, the City Attorney has drafted an ordinance, for Council consideration, banning solicitation (i.e.: panhandling) in certain areas of the City. The City has been receiving an increased number of complaints from both the residential and business communities regarding panhandling activities in the Tukwila Urban Center as well as along Tukwila International Boulevard. Currently, the Police Department has no enforcement tools to stop such activities. Without impeding on First Amendments rights, this draft ordinance prohibits solicitation (i.e.: panhandling) in the following areas: Tukwila Urban Center (boundaries defined in ordinance) Tukwila International Boulevard (boundaries defined in ordinance) Near Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) Near Outdoor Eating Establishments This draft ordinance was modeled after a similar ordinance used in the City of Tacoma which is effective and has resulted in a minimal number of arrests. Committee Members requested that the Tacoma ordinance be included in the information that goes to full Council. Additionally, Committee Members inquired if day reporting could be an option in place of serving jail time if a person is found guilty of said violation. Ms. Kerslake explained that it is ultimately at the judge's discretion. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. III. MISCELLANEOUS Acting Chair Quinn inquired about enforcement tools for response to abandoned properties and structures that appear to be occupied unlawfully. Ms. Kerslake responded that the Department of Community Development is currently working with the City Attorney's Office to evaluate strategies that address these concerns. Meeting adjourned at 5:16 p.m. Next meeting: Monday, November 28, 2011 5:00 p.m. Conference Room #3 at Committee Chair Approval Minutes by KAM. Reviewed by SK. 153 154 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS CAS NU\llil_,R: AGIM M ITF: \4 TI1'1,1? Initials ITEM NO. Meeting Date Prepared by I Mayor's review C,putacil review 11/28/11 SK L 4. E. 12/05/11 SK ITEM INFORMATION STAFF SPONSOR: SHELLEY KERSLAKE ORIGINAi-A(,FNDADAT1 11/28/11 Repeal of Section 2 of Ordinance 2323 regarding social card rooms. Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance ❑Bid -Axard PublicHearina ❑Other lltg Date 11/28/11 Adtg Date Nltg Date tl7tg Date 1215111 lltg Date 112tg Date Mtg Date SPONS()R Council Mgyor HR DCD .Fiszance Fire IT P &R Police 14V SPONSOR'S Given the results of the November 8, 2011 advisory vote regarding social card rooms, the su\- r\Mvz' Council has discussed repealing the sunset provision of Ordinance 2323, which would have precluded the operation of social card rooms in the City by 2016. RI cow Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. DATE: COMMITTEE CHAIR: RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ALllMIN• City Attorney /City Council C Forward Issue to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPi'MATURIF, RI?QUIRI AMOUNT BUDGETED $2.1 million Fund Source: Con nnents: Retains the existing revenue stream from gaming uses MTG. DATE 11/28/11 MTG. DATE 11/28/11 12/5/11 Transportation Cmte Planning Comm. APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION ATTACHMENTS Informational Memorandum dated 11/16/11 Ordinance in draft form 155 156 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton City Councilmembers FROM: Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney DATE: November 16, 2011 SUBJECT: Social Card Rooms ISSUE Whether to repeal Ordinance 2323, in part, to allow social card rooms in the City of Tukwila. BACKGROUND Ordinanace 2323, Section 2, prohibits the operation or conduct of social card rooms within the City of Tukwila, effective January 1, 2016. At the November 8, 2011 General Election, the City of Tukwila put forth Advisory Measure No. 1 to ask the City's voters whether social card rooms should be allowed in Tukwila. In response to Advisory Measure No. 1, a majority of the City's voters advised the Council of the desire to allow social card rooms in Tukwila. DISCUSSION The Council has expressed a desire to implement the will of the voters by repealing Section 2 of Ordinance 2323; thereby allowing social card rooms to continue in the City of Tukwila. This action does not impact other recent changes to social card room regulations, such as late payment penalties and tax rates. RECOMMENDATION The Council is being asked to consider the proposed ordinance at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole and December 5, 2011 Regular Meeting. ATTACHMENTS Draft Ordinance 157 158 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, REPEALING SECTION 2 OF ORDINANCE NO. 2323 RELATING TO THE PROHIBITION AGAINST SOCIAL CARD ROOMS AS A COMMERCIAL STIMULANT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, with certain exceptions, Section 2 of Ordinance No. 2323 prohibits the operation or conduct of social card rooms within the City of Tukwila effective January 1, 2016; and WHEREAS, at the November 8, 2011 General and Special Election, the City of Tukwila put forth Advisory Measure No. 1 to ask the City's voters whether social card rooms should be allowed in Tukwila; and WHEREAS, in response to Advisory Measure No. 1, the City's voters voted to allow social card rooms in Tukwila; and WHEREAS, as a result of said vote, the City Council desires to repeal Section 2 of Ordinance No. 2323 to allow social card rooms in Tukwila to continue; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Repealer. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 2323 is hereby repealed in its entirety. Section 2. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering and section /subsection numbering. W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Repeal prohibition on social card rooms 11 -14 -11 SK:bjs Page 1 of 2 159 Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 1 2011. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney Jim Haggerton, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: W: Word Processing \Ordinances \Repeal prohibition on social card rooms 11 -14 -11 SK:bjs Page 2 of 2 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials ITEMNO. Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor's review Council review 1 11/28/11 B %Pf e- 4. F. 12/05/11 BGJ CAS NUMBER: AGENDA ITEM TITLE CATEGORY Discussion ITEM INFORMATION STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 11/28/11 Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian/ Bicycle Bridge Acceptance of Federal CMAQ Grant and State Enhancement Grant Aft g Date 11/28/11 Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other Mtg Date 12105111 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date fig Date Mt g Date SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P &R ❑Police ®PbY/ SPONSOR'S Council is being asked to accept two grants for the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian/ SUMMARY Bicycle Bridge. The first grant is a Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) grant of $750,833.00 and the second is a Statewide Transportation Enhancement grant of $500,000.00. No match is required from the State grant, but the Federal CMAQ grant requires a 13.5% match or $117,182.00. The design agreement with KPFF Consulting Engineers is also being presented to Council tonight. REvII -WED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 11/21/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: JOAN HERNANDEZ RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. Public Works COMMITTEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREETS (NEW PAGE 10, PROPOSED 2012 CIP) Comments: MTG. DATE 11/28/11 12/05/11 MTG. DATE 11/28/11 12/05/11 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION ATTACHMENTS Informational Memorandum dated 11/18/11 New page 10, Proposed 2012 CIP Puget Sound Regional Council Letter with $750,833.00 Award WSDOT Local Agency Agreement with $500,000.00 Enhancement Grant Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 11/21/11 161 lM City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Transportation Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director DATE: November 18, 2011 SUBJECT: Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Project No. 90510403 Acceptance of Federal CMAQ Grant and State Enhancement Grant ISSUE Accept two grants for the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge. BACKGROUND In May 2009, the City submitted an application for a Federal CMAQ (Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality) grant for the Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge and requested $1,000,000.00. At the time, the application was not successful, but the project was included on the PSRC Contingency List for any additional funding (either through new federal funds being made available or awarded projects not using all the funds). In August 2011, the PSRC Executive Board awarded Tukwila a portion of the CMAQ grant in the amount of $750,833.00 from the Contingency List. In July 2010, the City submitted an application to the Statewide Transportation Enhancement Program in the amount of $500,000.00. This application was successful and a grant was awarded with funding available in 2011. DISCUSSION The Statewide Transportation Enhancement Program grant of $500,000.00 does not require any City matching funds. The Federal CMAQ grant requires a 13.5% City match, which in this .case is $117,182.00. A new CIP page is attached that adds the additional design costs while reducing the construction budget. Park Impact fees are being collected for this pedestrian bridge and the expected fees will now cover part of the City match for design, rather than just construction. RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to formally accept these two grants; the Federal CMAQ grant of $750,833.00 and the State Transportation Enhancement grant of $500,000.00 for the TUC Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole and subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular Meeting. Attachments: New Page 10, Proposed 2012 CIP PSRC Letter dated 8/4/11 Local Agency Agreement Supplement W: \PW Eng \PROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects \05 -RW03 TUC Ped Bridge \INFO MEMO 2 Grant Accept CMAQ State.docx 163 CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY Project Location 2012 2017 Capital Improvement Program 5 f SE 1 L_f3 10 GIs 2012 to 2017 PROJECT: Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Project No. 90510403 DESCRIPTION: Construct a new pedestrian /bicycle bridge over the Green River. Pedestrian /bicycle connection between Tukwila's Urban Center and commuter rail /Amtrak station. JUSTIFICATION: Supports local and regional goals and policies regarding land use and transportation in Urban Center. Pedestrian System Report identified the optimal location for bridge crossing to be south of the Best STATUS: Western Hotel. Type, Size, and Location Report was completed in 2011. Council approved a design of a twin -tied arch bridge with no accommodation for a future bridge crossing over West Valley Highway. MAINT. IMPACT: To be determined. State Enhancement design grant for $190k and Transit Oriented Development (TOD) planning grant of $55k. COMMENT: State Enhancement grant of $500k and Federal CMAQ grant of $750,833 for final design. Project is on Park Impact Fee list with funding of $2 million with an 80 %/20% split. FINANCIAL Through Estimated (in $000's) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 BEYOND TOTAL EXPENSES Design 229 30 984 390 1,633 Land (RW 100 100 Const. Mgmt. 1,000 1,000 Construction 6,485 6,485 TOTAL EXPENSES 229 30 984 390 100 7,485 0 0 0 9,218 FUND SOURCES Awarded Grant 229 30 916 321 1,496 Proposed Grant 5,200 5,200 Mitigation Actual 0 Park Impact Fees Expected 35 80 1,485 1,600 City Oper. Revenue 0 0 68 34 20 800 0 0 0 922 TOTAL SOURCES 229 30 984 390 100 7,485 0 0 0 9,218 Project Location 2012 2017 Capital Improvement Program 5 f SE 1 L_f3 10 GIs Pugef Sound Regional Counci P August 4, 2011 The Honorable Jim Haggerton City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mayor gger on: On behalf of the Puget Sound Regional Council, congratulations on receiving $2,000,000 for Ttrktnila Urban Center Access Project and $750,833 for Urban Center Pedestrian I Bicycle Bridge. This PSRC funding was approved by our Executive Board in July. Thanks to great work by your staff and elected leadership, these projects were identified as high priorities and rose to the top out of a pool of many other worthy projects. Helping communities secure federal transportation funding is one of the key roles of PSRC. We know in these tough economic times that local governments are searching far and wide for the resources to deliver needed transportation improvements and also grow jobs in the near term. In 2012, PSRC will select projects for the roughly $400 million in federal funds the region can expect to receive over the next few years. At every step of the way, ,ve hope you'll call on us with questions and concerns as you look for funding opportunities and work to implement your conununity's transportation, growth, and economic development plans. You can reach us at (206) 464 -7090 or online at psrc.org. Sincerely, IT,,— X rown Commissioner, Kitsap County President, Puget Sound Regional Council P.S. We're gearing up for an update of the Puget Sound region's five -year economic strategy, and there will be many ways for you and your staff to be involved in this effort, Look for more information coming soon and visit psrc.org/econdev /res to learn more. 1011 'Wester Avenue. Su °t& 500 Seaf Push o2or. 98104 :035 (206) L64.7090 FAX (206) 587.4825 psrc.org 165 Washington State WIAt Department of Transportation Local Agency Agreement Supplement Agency Supplement Number City of Tukwila 1 Federal Aid Project Number Agreement Number CFDA No. 20.205 STPE 1320(002) LA 6065 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance) The Local Agency desires to supplement the agreement entered into and executed on All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Project Description Name Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian/Bike Bridge over Green River Length not determined Termini approximately between Baker Blvd (if extended) and Longacres Way (if extended) Description of Work No Change Non motorized bridge over Green River and wayfinding approach improvements along Baker Blvd to include bike lanes, trail connector to the Interurban Trail east of West Valley Highway, and a new pedestrian signal on West Valley Highway Reason for Supplement Obligation of additional Enhancement Funds and CMAQ Funds r Y Does this change require additional Right of Way or Easements? Yes No By By Title Director of Highways and Local Programs Date Executed DOT Form 140 -041 EF Revised 1/2007 166 Estimate of Funding Ty of Work yp (2) (3) (4) (5) Previous Supplement Estimated Total Estimated Agency Estimated Agreement/Suppl. Proiect Funds Funds Federal Funds PE a.Agency 117,182.00 117,182.00 117,182.00 b. Other Consultant 190,000.00 500,000.001 690,000.00 680,000.00 c. Other Consultant 1 750,833.001 750,833.00 750 ,833.00 Federal Aid d. State Participation 10,000.00 1 10,000.00 20,000.00 Ratio for PE e. Total PE Cost Estimate (a +b +c +d) 200,000.001 1,368,015.00 1,568,015.001 117,182.00 1,450,833.00 Right of Way f. Agency 1 1 a. Other Federal Aid h. Other 1 1 1 Participation Ratio for RW i. State 1 1 1 1 j. Total RM Cost Estimate (f +g +h +i) 1 Construction k. Contract 1 I. Other m. Other 1 1 1 n. Other 1 o. Agency Federal Aid Participation p State 1 1 1 1 Ratio for CN o. Total CN Cost Estimate (k+l+m+n+o+p) r. Total Project Cost Estimate (e+i+a) 200.000.00 1 ,368.01 5.00 t.5614.01 5_00 117.182.0 1.450.833.00 The Local Agency further stipulates that pursuant to said Title 23, regulations and policies and procedures, and as a condition to payment of the Federal funds obligated, it accepts and will comply with the applicable provisions. Agency Official Washington State Department of Transportation By By Title Director of Highways and Local Programs Date Executed DOT Form 140 -041 EF Revised 1/2007 166 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes City of Tukwila Transportation Committee November 21, 2011— 4: 00 p.m. Conference Room 1 *NOTE: Special Start Time PRESENT Councilmembers: Joan Hernandez, Chair; Joe Duffie and Verna Seal Staff: Bob Giberson, Robin Tischmack, Stan Anderson, Jack Pace, Nora Gierloff, David Cline, Gail Labanara and Kimberly Matej Guests: Chuck Parrish CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 4:04 p.m. I. PRESENTATIONS No presentations. II. BUSINESS AGENDA A. Purchase: Thermoolastic Striper Staff is seeking Council approval to purchase a thermoplastic striper from Alpine Products of Auburn in the amount of $92,896.52. Alpine Products was the low bidder for King County, and the City of Tukwila can add to the King County bid for the same striper system. The thermoplastic striper will replace a paint striper, and is expected to significantly increase the life expectancy of pavement markings. The striper includes a trailer, meltor and applicator. $80,000 is budgeted for this purchase in the 501 Fund Equipment Rental Budget as a carry -over from 2010. The additional $12,896.52 needed for the striper will come from monies set aside for a Line Locator ($4,840.00), which will not be replaced, and the Street Department's roadside budget ($8,056.52). UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. B. Purchase: 250 LEOTEK LED Luminaries Staff is seeking Council approval to purchase 250 LED roadway lighting luminaires from LEOTEK Electronics of Milpitas, CA in the amount of $106,488.75. LED lighting provides the following benefits: Reduced power consumption (up to 50 Greater reliability Longer life expectancy Reduced maintenance Lower utility costs Funding for this purchase will come from 2011 Traffic Control in the Streets Division, the Annual Traffic Signal Program, and possibly funds from the Energy Efficiency grant being administered through the Department of Community Development. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. C. Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian /Bicvcle Bridge: Federal and State Grant Acceptance Staff is seeking Council approval for the formal acceptance of the two grants listed below in a total amount of $1,250,833 for design of the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestria/Bicycle Bridge. Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Grant. This is a federal grant which was awarded through the PRSC Contingency List this past August in the amount of $750,833. The grant requires a 13.5% City match ($117,182). Park impact fees are anticipated to be utilized as matching funds. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. 167 IMP COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS CAS Nu- iwirIt: Initials Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor' review 11/28/11 BG C'. 12/05/11 BG ITEM INFORMATION I STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON V i�lzrevZen/ ITEM NO. 4.G. ORIGINA],AGL:NDA DATr 11/28/11 A(;I "NDA I T I rl,I Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian/ Bicycle Bridge Consultant Supplemental Agreement No. 9 with KPFF Consulting Engineers C, \'1'1?GORY Di.rcus.rion E motion Resolution Ordinance BidAtvard Public Hearing Other lltg Date 11/28/11 lltg Date 12105111 1AItg Date Illtg Date Nltg Date iVltg Dare Mtg Date SPONSOR Council IA4ayor Adm Svc.r DCD Finance Fire Legal P6R Police PIF SPONSOR'S This supplemental agreement No. 9 with KPFF will complete the design and environmental permitting for the TUC Pedestrian/ Bicycle Bridge. The agreement also includes the design of a signal crossing at W Valley Hwy and the trail to connect users to the Tukwila Longacres Sounder Station. With two grants of $1.2 million, the design of the TUC Pedestrian Bridge is funded. Council is being asked to approve Supplemental Agreement No. 9 in the amount $1,367,580.11. �R1 'VA.;D M" cow Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 11/21/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: JOAN HERNANDEZ RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. Public Works Cc �N-iiNrri'rrr, Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE E\I'I?NDITURI', R1 :QUIRI'.D AMOUNTBUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $1,367,580.11 $1,633,000.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREETS (NEW PAGE 10, PROPOSED 2012 CIP) Comments: MTG. DATE 11/28/11 12/05/11 MTG. DATE 11/28/11 12/05/11 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION ATTACHMENTS Informational Memorandum dated 11/18/11 Supplemental Agreement No. 9 with KPFF Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 11/21/11 169 170 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Utilities Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director fl DATE: November 18, 2011 SUBJECT: Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Project No. 90510403, Contract No. 07 -123 Supplement No. 9 with KPFF ISSUE Approve Supplement No. 9 with KPFF Consulting Engineers. BACKGROUND In late 2005, Tukwila received a $200,000 grant for design of the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Pedestrian Bridge over the Green River from the Transportation Improvement Board's Statewide Enhancement fund. KPFF was selected for the Type, Size, and Location (TS &L) contract and has completed the TS &L Report. Staff has been successfully pursuing grant funds to complete the design of this project. In October 2010, a new grant from the Statewide Enhancement fund was awarded in the amount of $500,000. In August 2011, the City was awarded a second grant in the amount of $750,833 from the State's Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funding. With the completion of the TS &L report, the Council gave direction to staff to pursue the design of a twin -tied arch bridge with no accommodation for a future bridge crossing over West Valley Highway. DISCUSSION Supplement No. 9 with KPFF includes the additional scope and fee to complete the design and environmental permitting for the TUC Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge. Also included is the design of a new pedestrian signal across West Valley Highway (in lieu of a future bridge crossing) and trail design to connect users of the bridge to the permanent Tukwila Longacres Sounder Station. To complete way- finding for users, connect the two transit hubs, and provide quality bicycle access; the Supplemental Agreement also includes design of a "road diet" along Baker Boulevard to replace excess vehicular capacity with new bike lanes and on- street parking. Fiscal Impact: A new CIP page adds the additional design costs while reducing the construction budget. Park Impact fees are being collected for this pedestrian bridge and the expected fees will now cover part of the City match for design, rather than just construction. RECOMMENDATION Approve Supplement No. 9 to Contract No. 07 -123 with KPFF in the amount of $1,367,580.11 and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole and subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular meetings. Attachment: Supplemental Agreement No. 9 W: \PW Eng \PROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects \05 -RW03 TUC Ped Bridge \INFO MEMO Supp #9 KPF 11- 18- 11.docx 171 172 IRW 111 911110if 311108 U of Supplemental Agreement Number 9 Original Agreement Number 07 -123 (h) Project Number 05 -RW03 Project Title Tukwila Urban Center, Ped /Bicycle Bridge PSE Organization and Address KPFF Consulting Engineers 1601 Fifth Ave, Suite 1600 Seattle, WA 98101 Phone: Execution Date Completion Date 12/31/2013 New Maximum Amount Payable 1,612,436.93 Description of Work Time and cost adjustment to incorporate efforts for the Plans, Specifications, and Construction Cost Estimate Phase. The Local Agency of the City of Tukwila desires to supplement the agreement entered into with KPFF Consulting Engineers and executed on and identified as Agreement No. 07 -123 All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: A complete scnlle of work has been included as F,xhihit A -1 11 Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: Revised completion date is December 31, 011 III Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: Ann additional fee not -to- exceed 51,367,590 1 1 re sults from the added ded PSF phase scope New maximum amount pnynhlP is T1 61 41r) 9I as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement. If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. By Consultant Signature DOT Form 140 -063 EF Revised 9/2005 By: C i t3� of Tukwila Approving Authority Signature Date 173 74 Exhibit A -1 Supplement No. 9 Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Plan, Specification and Cost Estimate (PSE) PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Green River stands as a barrier between the City's urban center and the transportation hub of the Sounder Commuter Rail /Amtrak Station. This project is a preliminary step in defining the pedestrian corridor connecting these commuter hubs. This project shall determine the type of structure and its location for crossing the Green River. The bridge is to be a signature piece of the corridor and along with the associated trail provide a direct, safe and enjoyable walking experience. PROJECT OBJECTIVES The overall objective of this project is to develop a connection from the intersection of Baker Boulevard and Christensen Road to the Sound Transit property line of the Sounder Commuter Rail /Amtrak Station. This project will take place in three phases, which include the following: Type, Size and Location (TSL) Phase Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate (PSE) Phase Construction Management Phase This scope of work shall be for the completion of the TSL Phase and the advancement of the project through final construction documents for the PSE Phase. During and /or at the conclusion of the PSE Phase, the City of Tukwila can exercise the option to supplement KPFF's contract to include the Construction Management Phase. The project team is made up of the following firms: Owner Prime Consultant Structural Engineering Civil Engineering Urban Design Landscape Illumination Surveying Bridge Architecture Environmental and Permitting Services Geotechnical Engineering City of Tukwila KPFF Consulting Engineers KPFF Consulting Engineers KPFF Consulting Engineers KPG Inc. KPG Inc. KPG Inc. KPG Inc. LMN Architects Landau Associates Landau Associates 175 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 2 SCOPE OF WORK The following is a scope of work for the completion of the TSL phase and the completion of the plans, specifications and estimated construction costs (PSE) phase of the project. In addition to the basic scope of services, the Consultant has included additional services that can be performed at the City's request. Task No. 1.0 Project Management and Administration Task No. 1.01 Project Schedule A project design schedule shall be created in Microsoft Project that spans from the notice -to- proceed for the supplemental work to the completion of the PSE documents. The schedule shall be updated on an as needed basis. Task No. 1.02 Design Team Supplemental Agreements KPFF shall prepare supplemental contracts for KPG, Inc., Landau Associates, and LMN Architects. Task No. 1.03 Progress Reports A progress report form shall be provided to each team member. This form shall be filled out on a monthly basis and submitted with the invoice for the work described in the progress report. KPFF shall then compile the reports into a single document to be submitted to the City with the associated monthly invoice. Task No. 1.04 Invoices Team members are to prepare monthly invoices for work completed. KPFF shall compile the invoices into a single document to be submitted to the City. Task No. 1.05 Team Meetings The consultant team shall meet with the City on a monthly basis to discuss project issues, schedule, progress, and general coordination of effort. The consultant team shall meet internally on a monthly basis to coordinate project tasks and design. lW Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 3 Deliverables Project schedule with monthly updates Monthly progress reports and invoices Team meetings o Participation in project meetings with the City (assume 12 meetings) o Participation in internal consultant team meetings with the City (assume 12 meetings) Task 2.0 Design Criteria Document KPFF shall finalize the design criteria based on coordination with the City: Minimum bridge /trail widths. Horizontal geometry constraints (including minimum radii for curves) and allowable design speeds for bicycles. Maximum allowable vertical grades and rates of curvature for both bridge structures and for access ramps. Emergency access requirements. Minimum lighting requirements. Green River hydraulic opening requirements. Requirements for stormwater detention and water quality. Construction criteria within 100 -year flood plain. Utility clearance requirements. Structural loading conditions. Allowable structural deflections and vibrations. Physical/ aesthetic impacts on adjacent uses, Coordination with potential future vehicular bridge in similar area. Deliverables Draft Design Criteria Document Final Design Criteria Document 177 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 4 Task 3.0 Topographic and Boundary Survey KPG shall perform topographic surveying within the entire selected alternative bridge and trail alignment, which is defined as Christensen Road (west boundary) across the Green River to West Valley Highway (east boundary). Necessary horizontal and vertical control shall be established for the boundary and topographic survey of the site. The survey for the defined project corridor shall include the bridge and approach areas. Trail connections are from Christensen Road on the west side and from West Valley Highway on the east side to the bridge approaches. Task 3.01 Topographic Mapping Phase 1 KPG shall provide surveying under two separate phases. Phase One is from the Green River Trail on the west side of the river eastward to West Valley Highway. This phase allows the location of the bridge, ramps and connection to West Valley Highway, including the crossing of West Valley Highway for design and installation of a pedestrian signal (both sides of highway). Phase One also includes mapping the right of way of Baker Boulevard from Christensen Boulevard to Andover Park West, including the Andover Park East intersection, and shall locate curb, sidewalk, driveways, striping, illumination and utility castings. Task 3.02 Topographic Mapping Phase 2 Phase 2 shall include the Riverview Plaza parking lot contained within parcels 2523049077 and 2523049039, the SPU pipeline parcel 2523049048, and north of that parcel to the face of the Riverview Plaza office buildings. The intersection of Christensen Road and Baker Boulevard will also be included in this phase. The total acreage of this area is approximately 7 acres. All field topographic surveying shall be performed to achieve 1 -foot contour interval accuracy, and shall include location of existing 4 inches plus caliper trees (excluding Cottonwoods which shall be 12 inch plus caliper within 100 feet of the river), streets, curb and gutter, limits of paving, fences, above- and below ground utilities, drainage features, existing shrub and lawn areas, and existing improvements within the defined project corridor. A separate cost for private utility locating services has been included which assumes 24 hours of underground utility sensing and locating. The field survey includes surveying the banks of the Green River from 50 feet upstream to 50 feet downstream. The river survey shall include top of bank on both sides of the river and cross sections from top of bank to top of water at 25 -foot intervals. Indicate limits of 100 -year flood plain, ordinary high waterline (OHWL) flagged in advance on the bank by Landau Associates. 178 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 5 The survey crew shall use City provided Horizontal and Vertical control in the project vicinity and all surveying and mapping shall be based on City Horizontal and Vertical Datum. A base map at a scale to be selected by the project engineer shall be developed detailing the items located in the above described field survey. The map shall include positions of record and surveyed boundaries, as well as deeded and platted right -of -way margins for the project area. It is proposed to use KPG's existing layer standards and point codes for the survey. Once drafted, field verified, and certified, KPG shall provide the project engineer with two Xerox Bond copies of the topographic survey and one digital copy of project survey files (AutoCAD, point files, field notes). Any as -built information gathered during our research shall also be copied and submitted to the engineer with the topographic mapping package. The deliverable submittal package shall include detailed descriptions of point code and layering schema. KPG has included time and expense for project meetings, management of surveying and drafting efforts, professional review and quality control in our proposal. Deliverables Survey Project Base Map (two hardcopies, one electronic copy) Task 4.0 Geotechnical Research and Recommendations This task includes the completion of all field exploration and laboratory testing needed to finalize the geotechnical recommendations for the project. Geotechnical recommendations will be provided for stormwater infiltration, pavement design, and foundation design for the bridge and approach ramps/ embankments. Task No. 4.01 Field Explorations and Laboratory Testing Landau Associates propose to advance a boring in the driveway to the house located at 16113 West Valley Highway (King County Parcel number 000580033) to characterize subsurface conditions near the proposed east bridge abutment. This boring will be advanced to a depth of about 120 ft below the existing ground surface (BGS). Landau Associates plan to advance three additional borings along the proposed trail alignment to characterize subsurface conditions for stormwater infiltration rate evaluation and pavement design. These borings will be advanced to a depth of about 17 ft BGS. The borings will be completed using a truck- mounted drill rig using either mud rotary (bridge boring) or hollow -stem auger (trail borings) drilling techniques. Landau Associates have assumed that the City will obtain right -of -entry in order to drill the borings and that no fee will be necessary to drill the boring. 179 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 6 The drilling will be accomplished by Holocene Drilling of Puyallup, Washington under subcontract to Landau Associates. A geologist or geotechnical engineer from Landau Associates will supervise the explorations, obtain soil samples from the borings, and prepare field logs of conditions encountered in the explorations. Soil samples will be obtained from the borings on about a 2 1 /2- or 5 -ft depth interval using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) procedure, and returned to our laboratory for further classification. Soil samples obtained from the exploration will be held in our laboratory for 30 days after submittal of the final report. After that date, the soil samples will be disposed of, unless arrangements are made to retain them. Landau Associates plan to install a standpipe piezometer in two of the three borings advanced along the trail alignment. The standpipe piezometers will be constructed in accordance with Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173- 160 and will be protected at the ground surface with a flush mounted monument. Landau Associates propose to monitor the groundwater level in the piezometers twice during the rainy season (typically November to May). Upon completion of drilling and sampling, the boreholes not completed with a standpipe piezometer will be abandoned in accordance with WAC 173 -160 and capped with a minimum 1 -ft thick plug of quick- setting concrete. Abandonment of the standpipe piezometers is not included with this proposal and should be made part of the contract documents. Drill cuttings will be placed in steel drums and transported to WM Dickson's facility in Tacoma, Washington for disposal. Prior to drilling, a representative of Landau Associates will mark the boring location in the field and arrange for an underground utility locate (1- 800... call before you dig). Landau Associates will also arrange for a private utility locate at each of the boring locations. Three U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Falling Head Percolation tests will be completed adjacent to the three trail borings described above to determine the measured infiltration rate for porous pavement or biofiltration swale. The EPA Falling Head Percolation tests will be completed approximately 1 ft BGS. The hollow -stem auger drill rig will be used to core through the pavement section at the EPA Falling Head Percolation test locations. Upon completion of the in situ infiltration test, the PVC pipe will be removed and the hole will be backfilled with quick- setting concrete. Landau Associates will conduct geotechnical and analytical laboratory testing on representative soil samples obtained from the exploratory borings to aid in their classification and determination of engineering properties. Laboratory testing completed in our laboratory is expected to consist of 8 natural moisture content determinations, 6 fines content determinations, 10 index tests (either mechanical sieve analysis or Atterberg limit determinations), and 6 combined analyses (mechanical sieve and hydrometer). A total of six soil samples will be submitted to Analytical Resources, Inc. (ARI) of Tukwila, Washington for determination of the organic content and the Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC). The organic content testing will be completed in accordance with ASTM D 2974 and the CEC testing will be completed in accordance with EPA laboratory Method 9081. I:, Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 7 In developing this proposal, it was assumed that work would commence during daylight hours between Monday and Friday and that traffic control would consist of traffic cones. Task No. 4.02 Geotechnical Evaluation, Reporting, and Meetings Based on the results of our previous explorations for the TSL design phase and the field investigation and laboratory testing program completed for this task, Landau Associates will complete geotechnical engineering analyses to develop recommendations to support the design of the bridge, including: Recommendations for earthwork and site preparation including: clearing, stripping, and grubbing; the suitability of onsite soils for reuse in structural fill; import structural fill requirements, subgrade preparation; and placement and compaction of structural fill. Pavement subgrade preparation. Porous asphalt and porous concrete pavement sections (asphalt or Portland cement concrete and base course thickness) required for structural support of the proposed traffic. Conventional asphalt and Portland cement concrete pavement design. Design infiltration rate for porous pavement. The infiltration rate will be determined in accordance with the Simplified Method outlined in Section 5.4.1 of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual. Seismic design criteria, including an evaluation of liquefaction and lateral spreading potential. An evaluation of the stability of the riverbanks and recommended stabilization measures. Recommendations for approach embankment structural earth wall including: embedment depth, foundation subgrade preparation, design parameters, nominal bearing pressure, anticipated foundation settlement, and wall backfill and drainage considerations. Estimated settlement of the approach embankments. Recommended foundation type (driven piles /drilled shafts); recommended tip elevations; expected range of nominal axial capacity; uplift capacity; downdrag loads; estimated settlements of bridge foundations; additional lateral loads caused by lateral spreading; soil parameters for input into L -Pile (or equivalent) lateral pile capacity software. Construction considerations for the recommended foundation type. Discussion of the impacts of constructing the bridge abutment and approach embankment on the existing dike located at the west side of the bridge and any recommended mitigation measures. 181 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 8 Deliverables: The results of our field explorations and geotechnical engineering analyses will be summarized in a geotechnical report. The report will include a site plan showing the exploration locations, summary logs of conditions observed in the boring, results of the geotechnical and analytical laboratory testing, results of the in situ infiltration tests, and a discussion of subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the explorations. Two copies of the report will be submitted as a draft for review by the project team. Upon receipt of comments, Landau Associates will prepare and submit four copies of a final geotechnical report. An electronic PDF copy of both the draft and final geotechnical report will be provided to the design team. Landau Associates have also budgeted to attend one meeting in the Tukwila area with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer (USACE) and the local Dike District to discuss the impacts of the proposed project on the existing dike, and a project kick -off meeting at KPFF's Seattle office. Task 5.0 Hydraulics The Corps of Engineers (COE) has recertified the Green River Levee. The recertification is only for the west bank, so the 100 -year flood plain on the east side will be estimated at an elevation consistent with that determined by the COE. The following is proposed for the hydraulic evaluation: Task No. 5.01 Meet with Agencies Meet with the Corps of Engineers and King County River and Floodplain Management to obtain the best understanding of the ongoing studies and work along Green River. Task No. 5.02 Establish 100 -year Floodplain Based on existing COE data of the Green River, establish the current elevation of the 100 -year floodplain within the banks of the Green River. No work is currently scoped to identify 100 -year flood boundaries within properties beyond the west bank of the Green River or east of West Valley Highway. Task No. 5.03 Establish Structural Clearance Confirm vertical clearance defined within preliminary documentation with King County River and Floodplain Management and document negotiated vertical clearance requirements for the bridge. .i Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 9 Deliverables Draft Hydraulic Technical Memorandum (six hardcopies, one electronic copy) Final Hydraulic Technical Memorandum (six hardcopies, one electronic copy) Task 6.0 Environmental and Permitting Services This task covers consulting services to coordinate with regulatory agencies and to provide required permit applications and associated environmental documentation to obtain agency approvals for the proposed project. Task No. 6.01 Team, Agency, and Pre Application Meetings Landau Associates will assist in scheduling and participating in pre application meetings with the City, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), USACE, and Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to coordinate permit conditions and easement requirements for the project. Time is included to respond to agency comments on application materials prepared in Tasks 6.02 through 6. 10, as presented below. This task includes participation in at least two scoping meetings with WSDOT Local Programs /FHWA and /or other potential state /federal funding agencies to coordinate environmental documentation requirements associated with project funding. This task includes participation in up to six design team meetings and two project workshops as identified in Task 1.05. Assumptions Five agency meetings at the project site are included in this subtask. The six design team meetings and two project workshops will be held at KPFF's offices in Seattle. All time budgeted for meetings and workshops include travel time and the deliverables mentioned in this task. No additional studies will be required as part of the response to agency comments. Deliverables Meeting summaries will be provided in e -mail correspondence. Response to agency comments will be provided in e -mail correspondence and within the associated documentation. 183 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 10 Task No. 6.02 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist Landau Associates will prepare the SEPA Checklist for the project in conformance with WAC 197 -11 -960 and City standards. The SEPA Checklist (Checklist) will briefly describe the project and address the project's effects on elements of the environment, as outlined in the Checklist. The Checklist will include a list of permit requirements for the proposed project. To prepare the Checklist, Landau Associates will use project design information and other available studies prepared for the project, such as the documentation prepared for the additional tasks /subtasks included in this proposal. As necessary to complete the SEPA Checklist, Landau Associates will review additional City documents such as the comprehensive plan, zoning code, and other development regulations. Assumptions Additional studies for impacts associated with traffic, air, noise, or housing are not included in this subtask. Figures to be included with the checklist will be limited to those prepared under other tasks in this scope of work. The project will not require preparation of a SEPA Environmental Impact Statement. Either a Determination of Non Significance (DNS) or a mitigated DNS will be issued for the project. City of Tukwila staff will prepare and publish the DNS (or mitigated DNS). Landau Associates staff will not attend a public hearing should one be necessary. Information to prepare the SEPA Checklist will be gathered from interviews with agency /utility provider representatives and from readily available public documents; no additional field work or other primary investigations will be required. Landau Associates will provide a draft copy of the SEPA Checklist to the City and KPFF for review. KPFF will provide one set of consolidated comments to Landau Associates, and Landau Associates will prepare a final SEPA Checklist for publication by the City based on those comments. Should additional rounds of review and comment be requested by KPFF and /or City, a scope and budget amendment will be required. This proposal does not include time for Landau Associates to respond to any public or resource agency comments on the SEPA Checklist after the Checklist has been published for public comment. ;.I Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 11 Deliverables An electronic (MS Word) copy of the draft SEPA checklist. An electronic (Adobe PDF) and one paper copy of the final SEPA Checklist. Task No. 6.03 WSDOT Local Programs Environmental Classification Summary/ Documented Categorical Exclusion Landau Associates will prepare a WSDOT Local Agency Environmental Classification Summary (ECS) with supporting documentation as required for projects that receive federal funding through WSDOT (Environmental Procedures Manual, Section 310.07). The ECS will include the recommended National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) determination (assumed to be a Class II, Documented Categorical Exclusion). Landau Associates will document this assumption according to the WSDOT Local Agency Guidance (LAG) manual. Task 6.01 includes participation in scoping meetings with WSDOT Local Programs /FHWA regarding documentation requirements associated with federal funding. At a minimum, this scope of services assumes that the ECS will include a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (see Task 6.04), effect determination for species listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) evaluation (see Task 6.05), a determination of project impacts on cultural resources (see Task 6.06), and documentation of a wetland /waterway delineation and mitigation sequencing (see Task 6.08 and 6.09). The ECS will also require a discussion of stormwater treatment and detention, which will be based on design and information provided by KPFF. Assumptions The proposed project will receive funding from FHWA administered through WSDOT Highways and Local Programs. The budget outlined for this task may be used for completion of similar NEPA categorical exclusion documentation required if funding is provided by other federal agency. The proposed project will be determined to be a Class II Documented Categorical Conclusion (DCE) and neither a NEPA Environmental Impact Statement nor an Environmental Assessment will be required. Air Quality, Noise, Section 4(f)/6(f), Floodplain, and Environmental Justice analyses will be documented in the ECS. Individual discipline reports and modeling efforts will not be required for these elements of the environment. Wetlands/ waterways impacts will be avoided. 185 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 12 Deliverables An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the draft ECS. An electronic (Adobe PDF and FileMaker Pro) copy of the final ECS. Task No. 6.04 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Landau Associates will conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the residence located on a portion of King County Parcel number 0005800033 "residential property and a Screening -Level Environmental Assessment for the approximately 600 -foot trail alignment that extends east through the parking lot of Riverview Plaza from Baker Boulevard to the Green River "easement property;" to include up to four parcels). Additionally, a limited Phase II task will be performed for the residential property, consisting of a pre demolition Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) and Lead -Based Paint (LBP) Survey of the existing building on the residential property. These efforts will document the history of use and current conditions of the residential property and the easement property, and will identify and evaluate environmental conditions that may represent liabilities to the City. Landau Associates will conduct the Phase I ESA and Screening -Level Environmental Assessment in general accordance with the ASTM International (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, E 1527 -05 (as currently applied in the State of Washington), and with the scope of work as modified for this project. The ASTM standard, while subject to changes (as are all ASTM standards), is recognized as generally meeting the due diligence provisions of the federal statute [Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) 42 USC 9601(35) (B)] and the Washington State Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) (RCW 70.105D.040) at the time this proposal was prepared. ASTM E 1527 -05 was published in November 2005 to satisfy the elements of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) rule. This rule establishes requirements that purchasers must meet to limit their environmental liability under CERCLA and qualify for protections, including the "Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser" and "Contiguous Property Owner" defenses that were added by the amendments to CERCLA passed by Congress in 2002. The goal of the assessment process outlined in ASTM E 1527 -05 is to identify recognized environmental conditions, which are defined as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the residential property and the easement property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 13 enforcement action if brought to the attention of the appropriate governmental agencies. Elements not included in ASTM E 1527 -05 (e.g., identification, sampling, and analysis of asbestos, radon, lead paint, and lead in drinking water and /or wetlands; regulatory compliance; cultural and historic resources; indoor air quality and vapor intrusion, including the potential presence of mold or other biological contaminants; industrial hygiene; health and safety; ecological resources; and endangered species) are not included in this task, except for the Asbestos and Lead -Based Paint Survey discussed below, which will be performed for the existing building on the residential property. It is important to understand that Phase I ESAs are not a means of finding "everything there is to know about a property." Rather, they are attempts to determine the environmental liabilities of a property or properties based on reasonably available documentation (both oral and written) within the budget and schedule limitations. This approach will be applied to this task for the Phase I ESA for the residential property, which will include: Reviewing available aerial photographs, historical fire insurance maps, topographic maps, city or county maps and street directories, and local historical information to assess past uses of residential property and adjacent properties from the present back to their first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. Reviewing listings from a subcontracted database service (Environmental Data Resources, Inc.) of confirmed and suspected contaminated sites abstracted from EPA, tribal, and Ecology environmental databases, as prescribed by ASTM. ASTM requires that these databases be searched for confirmed and suspected contaminated sites within various distances up to a 1 -mile radius of the residential property. Contacting the local health and fire departments for information they may have on environmental conditions at and immediately adjacent to the residential property. Conducting a site reconnaissance of the residential property to visually and physically observe current land use activities and environmental conditions. Conditions at the residential property will be documented with notes and photographs. We will assess current uses at adjoining properties from the residential property and public rights -of -way to the extent that they are visually and /or physically observable. Preparing a draft written report presenting the results of the Phase I ESA for City review. The report will identify data gaps in our assessment, our efforts to fill them, and comments on whether the data gaps are significant and affect our overall findings. Preparing a final report incorporating City comments, as appropriate. 187 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 14 Additionally, an ACM and LBP survey will be conducted of the existing building on the residential property by RGA Environmental, Inc. (RGA), as a subconsultant to Landau Associates, to identify ACM and LBP, if present. ACM will require removal prior to demolition of the structure. The presence of LBP will require special work practices during demolition and lead containing building materials will require characterization prior to disposal. The survey of the existing building on the residential property will include the following activities: Inventory of suspect ACM within the residence by a building inspector accredited under the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act of 1986 including: o Identification of approximate quantities and locations of suspect ACM o Collection of up to 35 samples of visible suspect ACM o Submittal of samples of suspect ACM to a laboratory accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for analysis of asbestos by polarized light microscopy. Collection of up to 12 samples of painted surfaces from throughout the residence and submittal of samples to an accredited laboratory for analysis of lead by Flame Atomic Absorption (AA) for Total Lead reported in parts per million (PPM) Collection of one bulk building material sample for lead analysis for waste disposal characterization (using the toxicity leaching procedure analysis) The results of the ACM and I memorandum. Attached to tl provided by RGA including the locations of ACM and LBP in 1 and /or LBP identified, and considerations based on the analysis. Assumptions BP survey will be summarized in a technical e technical memorandum will be information analytical results, figures showing the specific ze residence, the estimated quantities of ACM worker protection and materials disposal results of the ACM and LBP sampling and The residential property consists of a 0.28 -acre parcel that consists of two pieces; the existing residential building occupies the southern -most portion, and undeveloped land occupies the northern -most portion. The northern -most portion of the parcel is not included in the Phase I ESA for the residential property. The City will provide copies of available environmental information about the residential and easement properties including any previous investigations or surveys. Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 15 The City will provide Landau Associates a completed copy of the "User Provided Information Request Form" prior to completion of the Draft Phase I ESA report. Landau Associates will provide the blank form. The City will arrange for access and any necessary rights -of -entry to the residential and easement properties. The City will provide access to individuals /owners /tenants familiar with historical operations at the residential and easement properties. Conditions at immediately adjoining properties may not be observable from accessible roads on the residential and easement properties or from public access areas and, as a result, may not be identified during the site reconnaissance. Deliverables An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the draft Phase I ESA and Screening Level Environmental Assessment report and the draft ACM and LBP Survey technical memorandum. An electronic (Adobe PDF) and three paper copies of the final Phase I ESA and Screening -Level Environmental Assessment report and the final ACM and LBP Survey technical memorandum. Task No. 6.05 Biological Assessment (BA) Section 7 Endangered Species Act (ESA); Magnuson- Stevens Act Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Evaluation Landau Associates will prepare a BA for selected species federally listed as threatened or endangered in the action area under the ESA and EFH Evaluation for the proposed project. Landau Associates will obtain updated species lists from agency websites, request site specific species and habitat information from the WDFW priority habitats and species database, and review information from the Washington Natural Heritage Program. Evaluation of specific project details, such as construction techniques and equipment used, timing of construction, and best management practices (BMPs) will be based on information provided by KPFF. The report will establish the project action area, which incorporates the furthest extent of both aquatic and terrestrial impacts. Appropriate environmental baseline information and species history will be summarized in the BA. A determination of "no effect' (NE) or "may effect, not likely to adversely affect' (NLAA) is anticipated. The project is not expected to impact EFH. Landau Associates will prepare a draft BA and EFH for review and comment by KPFF and the City, and then a final document. W e Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 16 Assumptions The BA will be drafted using the current WSDOT template. 30% to 60% level of design will be sufficient for preparation of the BA and EFH Evaluation report. The project will have a NE or NLAA determination on listed species or their designated critical habitat and a formal Biological Opinion will not be required. The project will have no adverse impact to EFH. WSDOT BA procedures for calculating the extent of aquatic impacts will be used. At the request of the Federal funding agency, this task includes participation at two meetings with agency staff from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries. The meetings are assumed to be at the agency offices in Olympia, and include travel to /from Landau Associates' Edmonds office. The proposed project does not include in -water pile driving or blasting. This task includes efforts to perform one 6 -month update review of species listings. These efforts do not include analysis of project impacts to additional species. Design and construction details required for permit applications that are not directly related to a critical areas determination will be provided to the Landau Associates biologist. Such elements include, but are not limited to, stormwater drainage report; temporary sediment and erosion control plan; proposed construction timing, sequencing and duration; and primary types of construction equipment to be used. The budget and scope does not include monitoring of any federally listed or state listed species during construction activities. Should any monitoring of these species be required, an addendum to this scope and budget can be prepared. Deliverables An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the draft BA and EFH Evaluation report. An electronic (Adobe PDF) and three paper copies of the final BA and EFH Evaluation report. Task No. 6.06 Cultural Resources Investigation Landau Associates will obtain the services of Equinox Research and Consulting International Inc. (ERCI) to support the City in determining cultural resources in the project area in compliance with Section 106 of the Historic Preservation Act and the Governor's Executive Order 05 -05. ERCI will perform the following activities under Task 6.05: ims Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 17 Assist the client in developing an Area of Potential Effects (APE). Prepare for and participate in project related meetings as requested. Carry out background research on the project and study area including reviewing the research previously carried out by Landau Associates. Design and implement archaeological field testing for prehistoric and historic period sites Landau Associates estimate 40 or fewer shovel tests will be required to test the areas of the project that are not covered with asphalt or otherwise inaccessible. Fill out archaeological site /isolate inventory forms for all sites encountered during testing. Determine eligibility (National Register of Historic Places) on all sites encountered during testing. Analyze survey results and prepare recommendations in a report in compliance with tribal, federal, or /and state regulations. Landau Associates will assist ERCI in identifying the Area of Potential Effects, provide coordination of field services, and provide report review for consistency with other project documents. Assumptions Human remains will not be found during field testing. A Memorandum of Agreement (federal process for disturbing an archaeological site) or State Permit Application for site disturbance is not included in this scope. Preparation of Historic Property Inventory Forms is not included in this scope. Deliverables Draft and final Cultural Resources Assessment report, including required digital and up to 5 paper copies of final report required for agency review/ approval. 191 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 18 Task No. 6.07 Shoreline Permit Submittal Landau Associates will prepare additional documentation as required by the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) for a shoreline substantial development permit. Landau Associates will complete the City's Shoreline Permit, application and associated documentation, including a SEPA Checklist (see Task 6.02), two sets of mailing list labels and a figure for property owners within 500 ft of the project. Information required as part of the application also includes five copies of the following: Description of project consistency with decision criteria Vicinity map Shoreline Site plans (top of bank, landward catch point toe of levee, riverbank toe, mean high water mark, and 100 -year base flood elevation, appropriate setbacks, maintenance easements, limits of construction) Sensitive area study documentation and plans Cross sections Landscape plans Civil plans Landau Associates will prepare the City of Tukwila Tree Clearing Permit application, which will be included with the Shoreline Permit application package. The "description of project consistency with decision criteria" listed above will include reference to the City's tree regulations. Assumptions The City will pay all the applicable permit application fees. Landau Associates staff attendance at a Hearing Examiner meeting is included in this scope of services. A tree survey will be completed by KPG and incorporated into the plans. Trees to be identified are (Cottonwood excluded) 4 inches or more in diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade and cottonwoods 12 inch dbh (diameter breast high) or greater within 100 ft of the river. Construction will begin within two years of permit approval and be completed within five years. 30% design plans will be suitable for the permit application, and the City will waive the requirement that civil plans be stamped, signed and dated by a licensed professional engineer as part of the permit application. 192 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 19 Deliverables An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the draft Shoreline Permit application submittals. An electronic (Adobe PDF) and required paper copies of the final Shoreline Permit application submittal(s). Task No. 6.08 Wetland /Waterway Delineation Landau Associates will conduct wetland delineations in accordance with the 2010 USACE Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region. The ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of waterways, including the Green River, will be delineated using guidance provided in Ecology's Determining The Ordinary High Water Mark on Streams in Washington State. Landau Associates will compile and review environmental information from readily available public domain resources to gain a general understanding of potential wetland issues at the site. Public domain resources include, but are not limited to: Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey data National Wetlands Inventory mapping Local Critical Areas mapping U.S. Geological Survey topographic mapping Recent aerial photography The field investigation will include an examination of vegetation, soils, and hydrology within the study area between the Baker Boulevard/ Christensen Road intersection to the west shoulder of West Valley Highway. Flagging will be placed along the wetland /waterway boundaries and will be confined to the project footprint. Any wetland /waterway habitat that extends beyond the project footprint, and within 200 ft, will be estimated both visually and using public domain resources to assess wetland extent. Included in this task is time to provide the project surveyors with a hand sketch of wetland /waterway boundaries to assist the surveyors to locate project flagging. We also included time to review the survey map and request any necessary changes to accurately represent existing wetland /waterway conditions. Wetlands within the study area will be rated in accordance with Ecology's Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington, and buffer widths will be determined in compliance with the Critical Areas Regulations. Stream typing and buffer widths are based on Chapter 18.45 of the TMC, and the water typing system presented in Chapter 222 -15 -131 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC). 193 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 20 Landau Associates will prepare a draft Wetland and Waterway Delineation Report in a format acceptable to the City and other regulating agencies that will include: A summary of the methodology used The size and rating of each wetland and waterway; a characterization of wetland vegetation, soils, and hydrology; and field data sheets A scaled site map showing the locations of wetland /waterway boundaries and buffers, locations of wetland data plots, and site topography Supporting photographs The draft report will be provided to KPFF and the City for review. Comments will be reviewed and incorporated into a Final Wetland and Waterway Delineation Report. The delineation report will be used in pre- application meetings for the purposes of discussing potential project impacts and determination of agency jurisdiction. Assumptions Flagging will be placed only within the project boundaries where accessible. KPFF will supply survey information in AutoCAD format to Landau Associates pertaining to the delineation and project plans. The results of the delineation and delineation report will be used in developing the 30% design. Avoidance of impacts to wetlands and the Green River is an integral part of the design to avoid the need for USACE permits for in -water work. Deliverables An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy the draft and three paper copies of final Wetland and Waterway Delineation Report Task No. 6.09 Critical Areas Report Landau Associates will support the project team in the calculation of the area of impacts to wetlands, waterways, and /or their buffers based on the 30% project plans. Areas of impact will be calculated in AutoCAD and will be summarized in the Critical Areas Report described below. Landau Associates will support the project team in determining adequate wetland /waterway impact avoidance measures. A conceptual compensatory mitigation plan will be developed by Landau Associates for unavoidable impacts to buffers. The conceptual compensatory mitigation will include a planting plan. 194 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 21 Landau Associates will prepare a draft Critical Areas Report in accordance with Chapter 18.45 of the TMC, and to meet standards of other state regulatory agencies. The report will include information from the Wetland and Waterway Delineation Report, and incorporate any necessary mitigation. This will include: A summary of the methodology used A description of impacts to wetland buffers and /or shoreline buffers A conceptual buffer mitigation planting plan (equivalent to 30% level) including: mitigation goals, objectives, and performance standards; a timeline for mitigation monitoring and reporting; and contingency plans, as necessary The draft report will be provided to KPFF and the City /agencies for review. Comments will be reviewed and incorporated into a Final Critical Areas Report for Wetlands and Waterways. Assumptions Impacts to wetlands and below the OHWM of waterways will be avoided. Project impacts will be limited to buffers only. Formal specifications will not be required as part of the report and /or conceptual design. Buffer mitigation can be accommodated on site (within the project limits). If offsite mitigation is required, the City will identify a suitable site to accommodate the required mitigation and potential out -of -scope work will be determined at that time. Conceptual mitigation plans and notes will not be incorporated into the overall plan set until the 60% level (see Task 6.10). KPFF will be responsible for coordination with the City and Landau Associates during review and finalization of the document bid package. 30% design plans will be suitable for impact calculation and development of conceptual mitigation plans. Deliverables An electronic (Adobe PDF) and paper copy of the draft Critical Areas Report for Wetlands and Waterways. An electronic (Adobe PDF) and three paper copy of the Final Critical Areas Report for Wetlands and Waterways. 195 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 22 Task No. 6.10 -Mitigation Construction Documents This task consists of the design services necessary to prepare and complete the construction documents for the mitigation design discussed in the Critical Areas Report. Landau Associates will be responsible for submitting construction documents at the 60 percent, 90 percent, and 100 percent levels. Landau Associates will prepare Divisions 2 through 9 of the Special Provisions (or equal sections if in a different specifications format) for the mitigation component of the proposed project. It is understood that only those divisions that are necessary for work related to the mitigation component of the proposed project will be included. The format will be the Washington State Department of Transportation's standard format. Landau Associates will prepare estimated quantities and associated costs for the mitigation planting design. The estimate will be based on the plans and specifications and will be prepared in accordance with the format established by the City. It is assumed that KPFF will provide examples of the most current specifications, estimated quantities and associated costs, bid tabs, and any AutoCAD base files needed to complete the plan set. Assumptions It is assumed that the mitigation planting area will not exceed 1 acre. Permanent irrigation design is not included in this task. Grading design and grading plans are not included in this task. A Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan is not included in this scope. Some erosion control design is anticipated, but any erosion control elements are expected to be minor and be coordinated with KPFF for incorporation into the TESC plan(s) done by others. A Notice of Intent, a Construction Stormwater General Permit and /or a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan is not included in this task. The CAD drawings produced will be based on Landau Associates standard in -house format. If specific CAD standards beyond this are needed, that information will be provided to Landau Associates. Deliverables Plans, specifications, and estimated quantities and associated costs for the mitigation planting design each at 60 percent, 90 percent, and 100 percent submittals (up to 3 sheets, 22- x 34 -inch sheets at full size). Items included in each submittal are as follows: Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 23 30 Percent Submittal (conceptual plan as part of Task 6.09) o Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (in Microsoft Excel and /or PDF format). 60 Percent PS &E Submittal: o 60% level plan set (3 sheets in PDF format) o Specification Outline (in Microsoft Word and /or PDF format) o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (in Microsoft Excel and /or PDF format) o Response to City 30% Comments (via email or Microsoft Word format) 90 Percent PS &E Submittal: o 90% level plan set (3 sheets in PDF format) o Draft Specifications (in Microsoft Word and /or PDF format) o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (in Microsoft Excel and /or PDF format) o Response to City 60% PSE Comments (via email or Microsoft Word format) Final PS &E Submittal: o Final plan set (3 sheets in PDF format and one signed original full sized set) o Final Specifications (in Microsoft Word and /or PDF format) o Finalized Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (in Microsoft Excel and /or PDF format) o Response to City 90% PSE comments (via email or Microsoft Word format) Task No. 6.11 Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (DARPA) The JARPA will include project specific information including a list of adjacent property owners. This task includes time for coordination and revisions with KPFF, the City and /or agencies, as needed, to provide accurate information on the DARPA, including a narrative of project information. The DARPA will be suitable for submittal to reviewing agencies, including but not limited to WDFW for the Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA), DNR, and the City. Full- or half -size project drawings will be provided with submittal to reviewing agencies. The SEPA threshold determination issued by the City (DNS or mitigated DNS) must be included as part of the submittal package to WDFW. Coordination with reviewing agencies regarding the DARPA is in included in Task 16.01. 197 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 24 Assumptions The project will not include any dredge /fill activity in any waters of the U.S. and will not require a Section 404 permit from the USACE. The Green River is not a navigable waterway subject to regulation under Section 10 of the Rivers Harbor Act. Project plans will include a survey of the OHWM. Deliverables An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the draft DARPA for review and approval. An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the final DARPA and three paper copies of the final DARPA. Task No. 6.12 Aquatic Lands Easement DNR will require an Application for Authorization to Use State -Owned Aquatic Lands for the bridge crossing over the Green River. Landau Associates will complete the application form and include a copy of the DARPA as a component of the submittal to DNR. Coordination with DNR regarding Application for Authorization to Use State -Owned Aquatic Lands in included in Task 16.01. Assumptions The project will not include any dredge /fill activity in any waters of the U.S. and will not require a Section 404 permit from the USACE. The Green River is not a navigable waterway subject to regulation under Section 10 of the Rivers Harbor Act. Project plans will include a survey of the OHWM. All other agency permits will be included with the application. Deliverables An electronic (MS Word) copy of the draft Application for Authorization to Use State -Owned Aquatic Lands for review and approval. An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the final Application for Authorization to Use State -Owned Aquatic Lands. Task 7.0 Project Workshops Task No. 7.01 Internal Team PSE Kick -Off Meeting The team shall meet to discuss the previous work completed on the project and develop an approach to move forward to be shared and discussed in a project kick off meeting with the City. Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 25 Task No. 7.02 TSL Review Project Kick Of Meeting The team shall meet with the City to review the work completed for the TSL Study and discuss the preferred alternative being advance through construction documents. Task No. 7.03 Tied Arch Concept Workshop The team shall meet with the City to discuss tied arch concepts. Task No. 7.04 West and East Approach Concept Workshop The team shall meet with the City to discuss approach concepts. Task No. 7.05 Final Concept Selection Workshop The team shall meet with the City to finalize the tied arch and approach concepts. Task No. 7.06 Public Outreach KPFF and LMN shall support the City by attending and supplying the following graphics for a single public outreach meeting. Workshop Graphics o Tied Arch Alternative Sketches o West Approach Sketches o East Approach Sketches o Connection Detail Sketches o Surface Finish Examples o Color Examples 199 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 26 Deliverables Preferred Alternative Graphics o (1) One physical Study level model, scale to be determined. o (6) Six "Sketch -Up" quality renderings Attendance at the TSL Review Project Kick -Off Meeting including the creation of the agenda and graphics. Attendance at the Tied Arch Workshop including the creation of the agenda and graphics. Attendance at the West and East Approaches Workshop including the creation of the agenda and graphics. Attendance at the Final Overall Concept Workshop including the creation of the agenda and graphics. Attendance at a one (1) Public Outreach meeting including creation of graphics. Task 8.0 Civii Engineering KPFF shall perform the civil engineering support work necessary to finalize the concept and complete construction documents for the project. Task No. 8.01 Concept Workshops and Preferred Alternative Selection KPFF will assist in the development of approach alternatives for presentation in the workshops outlined in Task No. 7.0. Upon completion of the selection of the preferred alternative, KPFF shall move the following civil engineering tasks forward through complete construction documents. Task No. 8.02 Site Preparation and Demolition KPFF shall identify demolition and other site preparation work necessary for the construction of the pedestrian facility. 200 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 27 Task No. 8.03 Horizontal and Vertical Layout KPFF shall establish a construction horizontal and vertical alignment for the pedestrian trail and bridge based on project control points and benchmarks. This work shall also include design and layout of other related facilities such as ADA ramps, curb ramps, etc, necessary for the pedestrian trail to tie to existing grade and necessary grades established for the pedestrian bridge. This work shall also include design and layout for accommodating vehicular crossing of the pedestrian trail, and design of features to address safety for this issue. Work shall also include rechannelization of Baker Boulevard. to reconfigure the roadway from four lanes to two lanes and bike lanes and parking. Work includes reconstruction of curb returns for curb bulbs for development of parking. KPFF shall develop plans for new vehicular accesses identified within the parking lot circulation study, task 8.08. Task No. 8.04 Grading and Paving KPFF shall develop the necessary typical sections and proposed terrain model, and establish finish grade and grading limits for the improvements. KPFF shall develop cross sections at a 25 -foot interval showing the existing and proposed grades. KPFF will meet with and coordinate with King County Flood District and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) personnel to coordinate, protect, and address their concerns with the project and anticipated construction and disturbance within the western Levee of the Green River. (Assume 2 meetings). Assumptions No finish grade contours are included in this work. All grades will be established with the proposed horizontal alignment, vertical alignment, and typical section. Detail sheets are not included in the 30% submittal. City will obtain necessary permits with the (USACE) for abutment work in the Levee. Task No. 8.05 Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control KPFF shall prepare temporary erosion control plans and details. Plans will be prepared to a format consistent with the KCSWDM and the City's standard details. 201 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 28 Assumptions Detail sheets will only include special construction. Standard details for the City of Tukwila and /or the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) will be referenced on the Plans, but will not be included in the plan set detail sheets. Detail sheets are not included in the 30% submittal. General notes are not included in this work. Task No. 8.06 Surface Water KPFF shall prepare a storm drainage technical information report (TIR) following general format of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) to identify runoff volumes. TIR shall not address all core requirements for the project improvement. It will, however, address decisions regarding stormwater impacts and verification of existing conveyance capacities. Draft TIR shall be submitted with the 30% design documents. Final TIR will be submitted during the completion of the PSE package, incorporating City comments. KPFF shall also study to find if any areas will be suitable for infiltration of storm water runoff, and integrate infiltration facilities to the extent determined by the City. Storm drainage plans will be developed to show necessary modifications to the existing drainage facilities. Assumptions Water quality facilities will not be required due to the non pollution generating characteristics of pedestrian facilities. Detention is required. The project site currently drains to the Green River. Work includes plans showing storm drainage profiles. Pipe lengths, types, and invert elevations will be shown. Detail sheets will only include special construction. Standard details for the City of Tukwila and /or the Washington State Dept. of Transportation (WSDOT) will be referenced on the Plans, but will not be included in the plan set detail sheets. Detail sheets are not included in the 30% submittal. Terrain model information for off -site runoff assessment will be provided by the City. 202 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 29 Task No. 8.07 Utilities KPFF shall design necessary relocations for City owned or privately owned utilities disturbed by the project. KPFF shall coordinate identification of utility relocations for any franchise utilities being disturbed within public Right of Way (R /W). KPFF shall meet and coordinate with Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) to coordinate, protect, and address their concerns with the project and their existing 60 -inch waterline. (Assume 3 meetings). Assumptions Private utilities shall be located by survey, and are not included within this task. Detail sheets will only include special construction. Standard details for the City of Tukwila and /or the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) will be referenced on the Plans, but will not be included in the plan set detail sheets. Detail sheets are not included in the 30% submittal. Potholing for determining utility depths is not included in this work. The City will be responsible for coordinating with the utility companies to perform any required potholing. Necessary utility relocations will be shown on the Storm and Utility Plans. Due to the small amount of anticipated work, separate utility plans are not included at this time. Work addresses existing utilities. No new utility construction is currently included in this work. Task No. 8.08 Channelization and Signing KPFF shall design necessary channelization, roadway signing, and striping work for the proposed construction and to address impacts to the existing parking layout on site. Work shall also include a study to identify alternative driveway relocation and internal circulation for Riverview Plaza's parking lot. Work shall also include rechannelization of Baker Boulevard from Andover Park W. to Christensen Road. to change configuration from four lanes to two lanes with bike lanes and parking, per configuration provided and negotiated with the City. This work will also include turning movement assessment for reconstruction of the curb returns. 203 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 30 Assumptions Detail sheets will only include special construction. Standard details for the City of Tukwila and /or the Washington State Dept. of Transportation WSDOT) will be referenced on the Plans, but will not be included in the plan set detail sheets. Detail sheets are not included in the 30% Design submittal. Pedestrian trail facilities and wayfinding signs are not included in this task. Temporary traffic control and temporary pedestrian route plans are not currently included in this work. City will facilitate coordination of rechannelization of Baker Boulevard with the other City departments. Task No. 8.09 Cost Estimate KPFF shall compile construction quantities for work identified on the Plans. The cost estimate shall be based upon WSDOT Standard Specifications and Standard Item Table. These quantities and costs shall be updated for each submittal and shall include backup documentation for each item quantity. Assumptions City shall provide copies of their latest bid tabulations for recent public works contracts. City shall provide unit cost for easements needed, including acquisition, appraisal, etc. Task No. 8.10 -Specifications KPFF shall compile specifications for civil work. 60% submittal shall be an outline of identified sections within WSDOT Standard Specifications and identified Special Provisions. 90% and 100% shall include all special provisions required for the bid items identified. Assumptions City shall provide all front end documents and Contract Boilerplate for specifications. Deliverables (Electronic and Hard Copies) Anticipated Civil Plan Sheets (Sheet Count: ±23) o Site Preparation (3 sheets) o TESC Plans (2 sheets) o TESC Detail (1 sheet) 204 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 31 o Roadway Sections (1 sheet) Plan /Profile sheets (3 sheets) Paving Detail (1 sheet) o Drainage (3 sheets) o Drainage Detail (1 sheet) o Utility (3 sheets) Utility Detail (1 sheet) Channelization and Signing (3 sheets) o Channelization Detail (1 sheet) 30% Submittal o Draft Technical Information Report (Drainage Report) o Site Preparation (3 sheets) o TESC Plans (2 sheets) o Roadway Sections (1 sheet) o Plan/Profile sheets (3 sheets) o Drainage (3 sheets) o Utility (3 sheets) o Channelization and Signing (3 sheets) o Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies) 60 Percent PS&.E Submittal: o Final Basis of Design 0 60% level plan set (3 sets 11x17) o Specification Outline (3 copies) o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies) o Response to City 30% PSE Comments (3 copies) 90 Percent PS &E Submittal: 0 90% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17) o Draft Specifications (3 copies) o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies) o Response to City 60% PSE Comments (3 copies) Final PS&,E Submittal: o Final plan set (3 sets 11x17) o Final Specifications (3 copies) 205 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 32 o Finalized Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies) o Response to City 90% PSE comments (3 copies) Task 9.0 Structural Engineering KPFF shall perform the structural engineering work. KPFF shall provide structural engineering for the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PSE) design phase of the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian/ Bicycle Bridge. Task No. 9.01 Basis of Design KPFF shall submit a written basis of design to summarize the design process and criteria. Task No. 9.02 Bridge Design KPFF shall provide structural engineering for the PSE design for the pedestrian bridge. The design shall include the bridge superstructure and foundations from the Green River levee on the river's west side to the triangular property on the river's east side. Components of the bridge design shall include the following items: Deep foundations such as piles or shafts for support of the abutments. West and east abutment substructures Arch design o Arch steel pipes o Arch connection to the abutments o Arch tension ties and tie connections o Arch connections Deck superstructure framing Deck slab Deck safety railings Arch suspension hangers and associated connection O Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 33 Task No. 9.03 West Approach Ramp Design KPFF shall provide structural engineering for the PSE design of the west landing ramp. The design shall be ADA compliant and include the ramp superstructure and foundations. Components of the west approach ramp design shall include the following items: Approximately 200 feet of ramp structure Four (4) shaft foundations Four (4) concrete columns Structural earth walls Steel superstructure Deck slab Hand railing Task No. 9.04 East Approach Ramp Design KPFF shall provide structural engineering for the PSE design of the east landing ramp. The design shall be ADA compliant and include the ramp superstructure and foundations. Components of the east approach ramp design shall include the following items: Approximately 100 feet of ramp structure Four (3) shaft foundations Four (3) concrete columns Structural earth walls Steel superstructure Deck slab Hand railing 207 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 34 Task No. 9.05 Miscellaneous Structures KPFF shall provide structural engineering for the PSE design of miscellaneous structures such as way finding signs, retaining walls, etc. Miscellaneous structures shall include the following items: Wayfinding sign supports and foundations Protective structures for existing utilities Structural retaining walls Lighting supports and foundations Deliverables (Electronic and Hard Copies) Anticipated Structural Plan Sheets (Sheet Count: t58): o General Notes Abbreviations o General Plan Elevation o Horizontal Control Plan Construction Sequence (2 Sheets) Foundation Layout o Pile Details o West Abutment Plan Elevation o West Abutment Details o East Abutment Plan Elevation o East Abutment Details o Superstructure Layout o Arch Plan Elevation Arch Sections (2 Sheets) Arch Details (3 Sheets) Arch Tension Ties o Arch Tension Tie Details Deck Framing Plan Elevation (2 Sheets) Deck Framing Plan Deck Sections (2 Sheets) Deck Details (2 Sheets) Arch Connection Details (3 Sheets) Deck Vertical Support Layout (2 Sheets) W Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 35 o Deck Vertical Support Sections (2 Sheets) o Deck Vertical Support Details (3 Sheets) o West Approach Plan Elevation o West Approach Foundation Plan Elevation o West Approach Superstructure Sections o West Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets) o West Approach Deck Sections West Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets) East Approach Plan Elevation o East Approach Foundation Plan Elevation o East Approach Superstructure Sections o East Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets) o East Approach Deck Sections o East Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets) o Main Span Handrail Layout Details (2 Sheets) West Approach Handrail Layout Details East Approach Handrail Layout Details o Miscellaneous Structures (2 Sheets) 30 Percent PS &E Submittal: o Draft Basis of Design 0 30% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17) o Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies) 60 Percent PS &E Submittal: o Final Basis of Design o 60% level plan set (3 sets 11x17) o Specification Outline (3 copies) o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies) o Response to City 30% PSE Comments (3 copies) 90 Percent PS &E Submittal: 0 90% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17) o Draft Specifications (3 copies) o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies) o Response to City 60% PSE Comments (3 copies) 209 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 36 Final PS&,E Submittal: Final plan set (3 sets- 11x17) Final Specifications (3 copies) Finalized Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies) Response to City 90% PSE Comments (3 Copies) Task 10.0 Bridge Aesthetics Collaboration LMN will collaborate with the team on overall bridge approach structure aesthetics, and will provide documentation supporting the PSE effort. Task No. 10.01 Design Development and Coordination (30% PSE) LMN shall submit a written Draft Basis of Design to summarize the architectural design process and criteria, and shall provide design option graphics for design workshops. LMN shall document, in drawings, the Draft Basis of Design for the 30 Percent PS&E Submittal. In addition to Preferred Alternative Graphics included in the deliverables below, LMN shall coordinate the development of presentation renderings. Architectural coordination will be conducted for the following components: Bridge Structure Arch geometry coordination Arch color Arch connections to: Suspension cables Bridge deck West /East abutments o Arch ties o Arch -to -arch lateral support Suspension cables Bridge deck Handrail system Light Fixture Coordination Approach Ramps Column treatments Superstructure treatments 210 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 37 Deck treatments Structural earthwall treatments Handrail system Creation of 30 Percent PS &E Submittal: Draft Basis of Design 30% level plan set (3 sets- l lx17) Task No. 10.02 Design Development and Coordination (60% -100 LMN shall provide architectural design and documentation services for the pedestrian bridge and east and west approaches for the 60, 90, and 100 Percent PS &E Submittals. Work shall include refinement of the Draft Basis of Design, coordinating the architectural design with associated engineering disciplines, construction documentation of the architectural components of the design, and preparation of architectural specifications. Deliverables Workshop Graphics: Tied Arch Alternative Sketches West Approach Sketches East Approach Sketches Connection Detail Sketches Surface Finish Examples Color Examples Preferred Alternative Graphics: o (1) One physical Study level model, scale to be determined. o (6) Six "Sketch -Up" quality renderings. Architectural Plan Sheets (Assume a sheet count of 10 sheets): o Codes, Notes And Symbols o Enlarged Elevations o Enlarged Bridge Sections (2 Sheets) o Enlarged Arch Miscellaneous Details (2 Sheets) o Lighting/ Electrical Routing Details o Enlarged East Approach Sections o Enlarged West Approach Sections o Bridge Handrail Sections 211 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 38 60 Percent PS &E Submittal: o Final Basis of Design 0 60% level plan set (3 sets 11x17) o Specification Outline (3 copies) o Response to City 30% PSE Comments (3 copies) 90 Percent PS &E Submittal: o 90% level plan set (3 sets 11x17) Draft Specifications (3 copies) Response to City 60% PSE Comments (3 copies) Final PS &E Submittal: Final plan set (3 sets- 11x17) Final Specifications (3 copies) Response to City 90% PSE comments (3 copies) Task 11.0 -Urban Design and Wayfinding Task No. 11.01 Illumination KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE for lighting for walkway, bridge approaches, and bridge. Work includes aesthetic fixtures, conduits, wiring and coordination of electrical power connection services with local power company. The Consultant shall evaluate lighting performance throughout the project using the AG132 illumination model. Task No. 11.02 Wayfinding and Furnishings KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE for wayfinding signage, and potential pedestrian furniture (i.e. litter receptacles, benches, trail railings (outside of bridge if required), etc.). Area for wayfinding includes Christensen Road at Baker Blvd. east leading to Green River and West Valley Highway to the a designated pathway on the east side of WVH (which also leads to the Tukwila Station). Task No. 11.03 Landscape and Irrigation KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE for planting design and irrigation design (including irrigation controller, water source point of connection) 212 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 39 Task No. 11.04 Walkway Section/ Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE aesthetic details for walkway section (note Civil Engineering by KPFF) and 30%/60% parking lot layout concepts for trail alignment studies through private property (Christensen Road to Green River Trail (note after alignment has been selected KPFF will provide Civil Engineering of Trail to Final PSE.) Deliverables Trail Alignment Alternatives and Selected Alternative Plan (including conceptual parking lot reconfigurations Anticipated Sheets: West Approach Landscape Plans and Details and Hardscape Details West Approach Enlarged Landscape Plans and Details and Hardscape Details East Approach Landscape Plans and Details and Hardscape Details East Approach Enlarged Landscape Plans and Details and Hardscape Details Trail and Bridge Lighting Plan and Details Wayfinding Signage /Site Furnishing/ Trail Railings Plan and Details o Survey Basemap in two phases 30 Percent PS &E Submittal: o Draft Basis of Design 0 30% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17) o Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies) 60 Percent PS&,E Submittal: o Final Basis of Design o 60% level plan set (3 sets 11x17) o Specification Outline (3 copies) o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies) o Response to City 30% PSE Comments (3 copies) 90 Percent PS8,E Submittal: o 90% level plan set (3 sets 11x17) Draft Specifications (3 copies) Updates Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies) Response to City 60% PSE Comments (3 copies)Final PS &E Submittal: o Final plan set (3 sets- 11x17) 213 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 40 o Final Specifications (3 copies) o Finalized Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies) o Response to City 90% PSE comments (3 copies) Task 13.0 Signal Design KPG shall provide pedestrian signal design for the crossing of West Valley Highway (SR 181), approximately midway between Strander Blvd. and Longacres Way and signal modifications at the intersection of Andover Park E and Baker Boulevard. This work will include coordination with WSDOT to obtain WSDOT approval. Depending on selection criteria(warrants) the signal could be Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (Hawk) signal. The location assumes no driveway /street intersection. Also coordination with Tukwila Signal Maintenance Department shall be required at the intersection of Andover Park E and Baker Boulevard. The following additional assumptions were made to provide direction to the design: No property acquisition will be required and the project will be designed within the existing public right -of -way with no additional right -of -way required. Verification of aerial and underground conflicts at signal foundation locations, will be required. Any permitting will be a part of the larger project and not tied to the signal design. Survey will be provided for both sides of WVH and the needed approaches for the intersection of Andover Park E and Baker Boulevard. Electrical connections and potential trenching will be drawn schematically to closet source, unless it is in vicinity of the signal. Geotechnical for the project will be the basis for foundation /pole design. Task 13.01 WSDOT Coordination KPG shall coordinate with WSDOT an approval process for the signal installation, including warrant analysis. Work includes preparing signal plans and specifications for WSDOT review and approval, including final plan and specifications approval for the city records. Task 13.02 Pedestrian Signal Across West Valley Hwy Design KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE for pedestrian signal design. Works includes coordinating with the City including any decorative and urban elements for the signal pole design, channelization and signing plans, center 214 Exhibit A Scope of Work Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9 Page 41 median/ crosswalk design, etc. Signal design shall meet WSDOT /City of Tukwila standards. Task 13.03 Signal Modifications at Andover Park E and Baker Boulevard KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE for Andover Park E and Baker Boulevard intersection signal modifications. Works includes coordinating with the City for temporary video detection installation, junction box loop splicing, channelization and signing plans, etc. Signal design shall meet City of Tukwila standards. Task 14.0 Right -of -Way Services This task will include the preparation of right -of -way plans and legal descriptions. It is assumed at this time that determining property values and conducting land acquisition negotiations is not a part of this scope of work and will be added at a future date as necessary. Task 14.01 Legal Description KPG shall provide legal descriptions and exhibit maps for three parcels. Task 14.02 Right -Of -Way Plan KPG shall provide right -of -way plans including existing right -of -way research and calculations, proposed alignment calculations, including a draft plan. Task 14.03 Title Reports KPG shall order title reports, review reports for legal descriptions and easements. KPG will also obtain legal description for DNR lease, determine ordinary high water line and prepare record of survey per DNR specifications. Task IS. 0 Construction Support Services The project team can provide construction support to the City as the project design is completed and the project goes to advertisement and then construction. Tasks could include attending preconstruction meetings, answering contractors' requests for information (RFI), submittal review and site visits. The scope and fee for this task will be determined at a later date. 215 Exhibit E -1 Consultant Fee Determination Sheet Summary (Lump Sum, Cost Plus Fixed Fee, Cost Per Unit of Work) Project: Tukwila Urban Center, Ped /Bicycle Bridge PSE Direct Salary Cost (DSC): Classification Man Hours Principal (Structural) 112.0 x Principal (Civil) 34.0 x Project Manager (Structural) 606.0 x Project Manager (Civil) 683.0 x Senior Engineer (Structural) 1468.0 x Senior Engineer (Civil) 40.0 x Project Engineer (Civil) 418.0 x Design Engineer II (STR) 1020.0 x Design Engineer I (STR) 0.0 x Design Engineer (Civil) 663.0 x CAD Tech (Structural) 1326.0 x CAD Tech (Civil) 668.0 Project Coordinator (CIV) 114.0 Project Coordinator (STR) 158.0 Admin 0.0 x Overhead (OH Cost including Salary Additives): OH Rate x DSC of Fixed Fee (FF): FF Rate x DSC of Reimbursables: Itemized SubConsultant Costs (See Exhibit G): Grand Total Prepared By: KPFF Consulting Engineers DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit E -1 Revised 06/05 Rate 65.00 65.00 60.00 50.00 45.00 50.00 42.00 40.00 40.00 38.00 35.00 35.00 22.00 20.00 18.00 Total DSC 128.46 x 307,068.00 Cost 7,280.00 2,210.00 36,360.00 34,150.00 66,060.00 2,000.00 17,556.00 40,800.00 0.00 25,194.00 46,410.00 23,380.00 2,508.00 3,160.00 0.00 307,068.00 394,459.55 30 x 307,068.00 92,120.40 0.00 573,932.16 1,367,580.11 Date: November 15, 2011 216 Exhibit G -1 Subconsultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet (Mandatory when Subconsultants are utilized) Project: Tukwila Urban Center, PedBicycle Bridge PSE Sub Consultant: KPG Direct Salary Cost (DSC): Classification Man Hours Senior UD/LA 197.0 X Project Sury 90.0 X Designer LA /Survey 549.0 X CAD Technician 701.0 X Survey Crew 184.0 X Office Admin 0.0 X X X X 64.90 56.56 40.13 31.25 47.66 23.08 Total DSC Overhead (OH Cost including Salary Additives): OH Rate x DSC of 163.1745 x Fixed Fee (FF): FF Rate x DSC of 25 x Reimbursables: Itemized SubConsultant Total Grand Total Prepared By: KPG DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit G -1 Revised 01/09 70,582.76 70,582.76 Cost 12,785.30 5,090.40 22,031.37 21,906.25 8,769.44 0.00 70,582.76 115,173.07 17,645.69 7,450.00 210,851.52 Date: November 15, 2011 217 Exhibit G -1 Subconsultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet (Mandatory when Subconsultants are utilized) Project: Tukwila Urban Center, Ped /Bicycle Bridge PSE Sub Consultant: LMN Architects Direct Salary Cost (DSC): Classification Man Hours Partner Project Manager Project Designer Project Architect Intern Admin Specs QA /QC 156.0 322.0 404.0 378.0 467.0 37.0 68.0 52.0 X X X X X X X X X Raw 72.84 39.42 44.23 34.86 23.56 18.75 39.42 38.42 Total DSC Overhead (OH Cost including Salary Additives): OH Rate x DSC of 190.47 x Fixed Fee (FF): FF Rate x DSC of 25 %X$ Reimbursables: Itemized SubConsultant Total Grand Total Prepared By: LMN Architects DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit G -1 Revised 01/09 71,476.95 71,476.95 Cost 11,363.04 12,693.24 17,868.92 13,177.08 11,002.52 693.75 2,680.56 1,997.84 71,476.95 136,142.15 17,869.24 230,488.33 Date: November 15, 2011 218 Exhibit G -1 Subconsultant Fee Determination Sheet Summary (Mandatory when Subconsulatnats are utilized) Project: Tukwila Urban Center, Ped /Bicycle Bridge PSE Sub Consultant: Landau Associates Direct Salary Cost (DSC): Classification Man Hours Rate Cost Principal 12.0 x 65.00 780.00 Senior Associate 10.0 x 56.00 560.00 Associate 67.0 x 47.00 3,149.00 Senior 350.0 x 40.00 14,000.00 Senior Project 68.0 x 36.00 2,448.00 Project: 104.0 x 32.00 3,328.00 Senior Staff 16.0 x 30.00 480.00 Staff 98.0 x 25.00 2,450.00 Senior CAD 78.0 x 31.00 2,418.00 CAD /GIS Tech 7.0 x 24.00 168.00 Project Coord. 92.0 x 29.00 2,668.00 Support Staff 22.0 x 17.00 374.00 Total DSC 32,823.00 Overhead (OH Cost including Salary Additives): OH Rate x DSC of 200.87 x 32,823.00 65,931.56 Fixed Fee (FF): FF Rate x DSC of 25 x 32,823.00 8,205.75 Reimbursables: Itemized 25,632.00 SubConsultant Total 0.00 Grand Total 132,592.31 Prepared By: Landau Associates Date: November 15, 2011 DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit G -1 Revised 01/09 219 KPFF Consulting Engineers All Companies Task 1 SCOPE OF WORK FEE ESTIMATE City of Tukwila Tukwila Urban Center. PedestrleNBicycle Bridge KPFF Prime Management Structural Total Fee l $517,100.92 1 KPFF CMI KPG Inc. LMN Architects Landau Associates Grand Total $276,547.03 1 $210,851.52 1 $230,488.33 1 $132,592.31 1 $1.387,680.11 10 Project Management and Administration 1 1.01 Project Schedule 1 $4,962 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,514 1 $0 1 $6,476 1.02 Design Team Supplemental Agreements 1 $1,241 1 $O 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 I 1 $1,241 1.03 Progress Reports 1 $3,102 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,202 1 $0 1 $5,304 1.04 Invoices 1 $3,102 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,202 1 $0 1 $5,304 1.05 Team Meetings (Assume 12 meetings 3 City Workshops) 1 $0 1 $0 1 $12,469 1 $11,535 1 $0 1 $24,003 Consultant Meetings W/ City (Assume 12 meeting 1 $6,513 1 $2,326 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $8,839 Consultant Internal Meetings (Assume 12 meetinp. 1 $6,513 1 $3,102 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $9,615 Reimbursabli3O $0 1 $0 1 $250 1 $0 1 $0 1 $250 1 1 I: I I I Subtotal) $25,432 1 $5,428 1 $12,719 1 $17,452 1 $0 $61,031 2.0 Design Crlteda Document 2.01 Design Criteria Draft 1 $3,102 1 $4,094 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $7,196 2.02 Design Criteria Final 1 $1,241 1 $2,998 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $4,239 Reimbursablesl $O 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $O I I 1 1 1 1 '1 subtotals $4,342 1 $7,092 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 $11,434 .si. 3.0 Topographic and Boundary Survey (KPG KPFF CMI) 3.01 Topographic Mapping Phase 1 1 $0 1 $0 1 $18,210 1 $O 1 $0 1 $18,210 302 Topographic Mapping Phase 2 1 $0 1 $0 1 $9,967 1 $O 1 $0 1 $9,967 3.03 Survey Base Review 1 $0 1 $4,528 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,528 Reimbursablesl $0 1 $0 1 $3,500 $0 1 $0 1 $3,500 Subtotal) #ii i3' a:!^w««M I_ ,»„w«.a» fi nical esee and ecommenceffl 461 1- eid E><ploraiions anti Laboratory I eating I au 1 bu I $0 1 $u 1 $4,246 1 $4,24J 4.02 Geotethnical Evaluation, Reporting and Meetings 1 $0 I $0 I $O 1 $O 1 $10,148 1 $10,148 4.03 Review of Report and Comments 1 to 1 $2,181 1 70 I $O I $0 1 12,181 Reimbursablesl $0 1 $0 I g 0 1 $0 1 $14,156 1 $14,156 Subtotals 1 1 bU .L0,.4b 5.0 'Hydreu Ics KPFF CMII 5.01 Meetwith Agencies 1 bu 1 $J,515 1 $u 1 $u 1 $u 1 b3.515 5.02 Establish 100 -Tear Floodplain 1 $0 1 $3,949 1 so 1 $0 1 $0 1 63,949 5.03 Establish Structural Clearance l $0 I $1,489 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 I $1,489 Reimbursablesl $0 I $0 1 to I $0 I $0 I $0 l I 1 1 r i Subtptall 1 ;u 1 1 u si w7,m„ `3( B� nv ronmen an rm n ces n bbl iaaRr, Agency, and Yre- APphclmon meetings bU 1 bu 1 so 1 $U 1 $19,188 1 b19,168 6.02 SEPA Checklist 1 Yo I $2,688 1 $0 1 $O 1 52,966 1 $6P44 6.03 WSDOT Local Programs ECS 1 $0 I 4385 1 to 1 $0 I $3,594 1 $4,980 6.04 Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment l $0 1 I $0 1 $0 1 $8,434 1 $8,434 6.05 Biological AssessmenVEFH I $o 1 $3,701 1 $0 1 $0 1 611,467 1 $15,169 6.06 Cultural Resources Investigation l to 1 b0 1 $0 1 $0 1 31,421 1 11,421 6.07 Shoreline Permit l $O I $2.109 1 $0 1 $o I $7,290 1 $4399 6.08 wet la nd/Waterway Delineation l to I $0 1 $0 1 to I $9,251 1 $9,251 6.09 Critical Areas Report I b0 I $3,JS0 1 to 1 $u 1 $10,988 1 $14,J35 6.10 Mitgabon Construebon Documents 1 $0 1 1 $o 1 $0 1 $14,061 1 $14,061 6.11 JARPA l $0 1 $1,241 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,369 I $3,610 6.12 Aquatic Lands Easement l $0 1 $o I to 1 $0 I $1,594 1 $1,594 Reimbursablesl $u I $u 1 bu 1 to 1 41" 1 ill,b ib h 1 Y s Subtatell 1 1 1 u 1 I aiir,uau 1 7.0 Project Workshops 7.01 Internal Team PSE Kick-Off Meeting I $2,378 1 $1,034 1 $1,211 1 $1,477 1 $0 1 $6,100 7.02 TSL Review& Project Kick-Off Meeting 1 $2,378 1 $1,034 1 $1,211 1 $1,477 1 $0 1 $6,100 7.03 Tied Arch Concept Workshop I $2,895 1 $1,034 1 $748 1 $1,477 1 $0 1 $6,154 Tied Arch Alternatives Graphics 1 $0 1 1 $0 1 $3,608 I $0 1 $3,608 7.04 West and East Approach Concept Workshop 1 $2,895 1 $1,034 1 $1,211 1 $1,477 1 $0 1 $6,617 West Approach 1 3o 1 $0 1 $O 1 $2,419 1 1 $2,419 East Approach 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $2,419 1 $0 1 $2,419 7.05 Final Concept Selection Workshop I $3,618 I $1,034 1 $1,211 I $1.477 1 $0 1 $7,340 Connection Detail Sketches 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O I $3,014 1 $0 1 $3,014 Surface Finish Examples I $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $1,737 1 $O 1 $1,737 Color Examples 1 $0 I SO 1 $O 1 $1,737 1 $O 1 $1,737 Study Model Development I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,368 1 $0 1 $4,368 Sketch Up Quality Renderings (6) 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 I $2,305 1 $0 1 $2,305 7.06 Public Outreach I $3,618 1 $1,034 $0 1 $1,477 1 $0 1 $6,130 Graphics 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $12,110 I $0 1 $12,110 Reimbursablesl $0 1 $0 1 $200 I $2,500 1 $0 1 $2,700 Subtatell $17,782 1 $6,203 1 $5,791 1 $45,081 1 $0 1 $74,857 8.0 CMI Enlrineedno 8.01 Concept Workshop and Preferred Alt Selection 1 $0 1 $5,479 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,479 8.02 Site Prep and Demofition 1 $0 1 $4,342 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,342 8.03 Horizontal and Vertical Layout 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 Route Layout 1 $0 1 $1,902 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $1.902 Horizontal Control 1 $0 I $1,385 1 $0 I $0 I $O I $1,385 Ramp transitions 1 $0 1 $2,605 1 $0 I $0 I $0 I $2,605 Vertical Alignment I $0 I $1,861 I $0 I $0 I $0 I $1,861 Vehicular Crossing of Trail I $0 1 $2,688 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $2,688 1 Rechannelization Baker St 1 $0 I $6,038 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $6,038 7 Riverview Plaza Dnveway Reconstruction 1 $0 I $6,823 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $6,823 8.04 Gradingand Paving I $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 Terrain Model I $0 I $2,957 1 $0 1 $0 I SO 1 $2,957 Typical Section 1 $0 I $1,820 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $1.820 Colod with KCFD and USACE 1 $0 I $2,988 1 $O 1 $O 1 $0 1 $2,988 8.05 TESC 1 $0 1 $5,211 I $0 1 $O 1 $O 1 $5,211 8.06 Surface Water 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 TIR 1 $0 1 $8,571 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $8,571 Site Drainage 1 $0 I $4,197 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,197 Infiltration I $0 1 $4,280 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,280 8.07 Utilities 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 City and Private Relocations 1 $0 1 $2,605 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,605 220 Page 1 of 4 KPFF Consulting Engineers FEE ESTIMATE: City of Tukwila Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestdan/Blcycle Bridge KPFF Prime a. All Companies Management KPFF Chill KPG Inc. LMN Architects Landau Associates Grand Total Structural a: SCOPE Total Feel $517,100.92 1 $276,547,03 1 $210,851.52 1 1230,488.33 1 $132,592.31 1 $1.367,580.11 Teak OF WORK h .s X41" �if; Franchise Utility Coordination $0 $1,820 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 I $1,820 Seattle Public Utility Coordination I $0 I $5,314 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,314 8.08 Channellzatlon and Signing I $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 Parking Lot Revisions l $0 I $7,175 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $7,175 Roadway Signing I $0 I $196 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $196 Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Circulation Study I $0 I $6,100 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $6,100 Rechannelization Baker St I $0 1 $4,197 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 I $4.197 8.09 Cost Estimate I $0 I $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 I $0 30% I $0 I $2,941 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $2,941 60% I $0 I $5,030 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $5,030 90% I $0 I $3,810 l $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $3,810 Final I $0 1 $3,642 I $O 1 $0 1 $0 I $3,642 8.10 Specifications I $0 1 $0 I $0 I $0 I $O I $0 60% Outline I $0 1 $1,034 I $0 1 $0 1 I $1,034 90% Special Provisions I $0 1 $3,993 I $0 1 $0 I I $3,993 Final Special Provisions I $0 1 $3,727 l $0 1 $0 I $0 I $3,727 8.11 Plansheote 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 I $O 1 $o 30% 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 Site Preparation (4 sheets) I $0 1 $3,536 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $3,536 TESC Plans (4 sheets) I $0 1 $3,277 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $3,277 Roadway Sections (1 sheet) I $0 1 $2,243 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,243 Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I $0 1 $3,231 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $3.231 Drainage (4 sheets) 1 $0 1 $4,218 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,218 Utility (3 sheets) 1 $0 1 $1,856 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,856 Channelization and Signing (3 sheets) l $0 1 $3,148 I $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $3,148 QC Review I $0 1 $5,355 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,355 I $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 Y $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $O Site Preparation (4 sheets) 1 $0 1 $2.884 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $2,884 TESC Plans (4 sheets) 1 $0 1 $2,755 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,755 TESC Detail (1 sheet) 1 $0 1 $2,362 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $2.362 Roadway Sections (1 sheet) I $0 1 $1,768 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $1,768 Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I $0 1 $4,016 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $4,016 Paving Detail (I sheet) 1 $0 1 $2,026 1 $O 1 $0 I $0 1 $2,026 Drainage (4 sheets) l $0 1 $3,701 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $3,701 Drainage Detail (I Sheet) I $0 1 $1,851 1 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,851 Utility (3 sheets) I $0 1 $1,768 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,768 Utility Detail (1 sheet) I $0 1 $1,768 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,768 Channelization and Signing(4 sheets) 1 $0 1 $3,536 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $3,536 Channelization Detail (1 sheet) 1 $O 1 $1,639 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 I $1,639 QC Review 1 $0 1 $5,717 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,717 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 90% 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 Site Preparation (4 sheets) I $0 1 $2,393 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,393 TESC Plans (4 sheets) 1 $0 1 $2,362 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,362 TESC Detail (1 sheet) 1 $0 1 $1.246 1 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,246 Roadway Sections (1 sheet) 1 $0 1 $1,639 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,639 Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) 1 $0 1 $3,148 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $3,148 Paving Detail (I sheet) 1 $0 1 $1,639 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,639 Drainage (3 sheets) 1 $0 1 $2,011 1 $0 1 $0 $0 1 $2,011 Drainage Detsil(1 Sheet) 1 $0 1 $1,851 1 $O 1 $0 I $0 1 $1,851 Utility (3 sheets) 1 $0 1 $1,768 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,768 Utility Detail (I sheet) 1 $0 1 $1,768 I $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,768 Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) 1 $0 1 $3,536 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 I $3,536 Channelization Detail (1 sheet) 1 $0 1 $1,639 1 $0 1 $0 I I $1,639 QC Review I $0 1 $5,262 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $5,262 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 I $0 100% 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $o Site Preparation (4 sheets) 1 $0 1 $507 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $507 TESC Plans (4 sheets) 1 $0 1 $507 I $0 I $O 1 $0 1 $507 TESC Detail (1 sheet) 1 1 $703 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $703 Roadway Sections (1 sheet) 1 1 $507 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $507 Plan /Profile Sheets IS sheets) 1 $0 1 $1,639 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,639 Paving Detail (I sheet) 1 $0 I $1.639 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,639 Drainage (4 sheets) 1 $0 I $708 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $708 Drainage Detail (1 sheet) I $0 I $1,416 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $1,416 Utility (3 sheets) 1 $0 I $1,768 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $1,768 Utility Detail (1 sheet) 1 $0 1 $1.768 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,768 Channelization and Signing i4 sheets) I $0 1 $1,768 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,768 Channelization Detail (1 sheet) 1 $0 1 $408 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $408 QC Review 1 $0 I $1,825 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,825 I $0 I $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 Final Bid Set 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 Site Preparation (4 sheets) 1 $0 1 $401 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $401 TESC Plans (4 sheets) 1 $0 1 $310 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $310 TESC Detail (1 sheet) 1 $0 1 $220 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $220 Roadway Sections (1 Sheet) 1 $0 1 $220 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $220 Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) l $0 1 $401 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $401 Paving Detail (I sheet) I $0 1 $220 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $220 Drainage (4 sheets) I $0 1 $401 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $401 Drainage Detail (I sheet) I $0 1 $349 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $349 Utility (3 sheets) 1 $0 1 $530 I $O I $0 1 $0 1 $530 Utility Detail (I sheet) 1 $0 1 $349 I $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $349 Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) 1 $0 1 $801 I $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $801 Channelization Detail (1 sheet) 1 1 $220 I $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $220 QC Review l $0 1 $1060 1 $0 $O I $0 1 $1,060 Reimbursablesl $0 I $0 1 $0 $0 I $0 I $O Subtotall $0 1 $228,287 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $228,287 9.0 Structural EnQneedng(KPFF) 9.01 Basis of Design 1 $879 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $879 9.02 Bridge Design 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 Deep Foundations 1 $20,056 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $20,056 West Abutment 1 $10,028 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $10,028 East Abutment I $10,028 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $10,028 Arch Steel Pipes I $15,921 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $15,921 Arch Abutment Connections I $5,634 I $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $5,634 Arch Tension Ties I $11,269 I $0 1 $0 1 $O I $0 1 $11,269 Arch Miscellaneous Connections 1 $5,634 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $5,634 Page 2 of 4 221 KPFF Consulting Engineers FEE ESTIMATE: CWI of Tukwila Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrlan/81uycle Bridge Page 3 of 4 222 KPFF Prime All Companies Management KPFF CIVII KPG Ina LMN Architects Landau Associates Grand Total Structural Total Feel $517,100.92 1 $276,547.03 1 $210,851.52 1 $230,488.33 1 $13 ?592.31 I 51,387,580.11 Task SCOPE OF WORK Deck Superstructure Framing $7,702 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $7,702 Deck Slab 1 $7,702 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $7,702 Deck Hand Railing l $7,702 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $7,702 Arch Suspension Hangers l $20,056 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $20,056 903 WeSt Approach Ramp Design I $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 Shaft Foundations l $11,269 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $11,269 Concrete Columns l $10,028 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $10,028 Structural Earth Walls l $10,028 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $10,028 Steel Superstructure l $11,269 1 $0 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $11,269 Deck Slab l $10,028 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $10,028 Hand Railings l $10,028 1 $0 1 $O 1 1 $O 1 $10,028 9.04 East Approach Ramp Design l $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 Shaft Foundations 1 $5,634 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 $0 I $5,634 Concrete Columns Y $5,634 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,634 Structural Earth Walls 1 $5,634 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $5,634 Steel Superstructure 1 $10,028 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $O 1 $10,028 Deck Slab 1 $5,634 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $5,634 Hand Railings 1 $5,634 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,634 9.05 Miscellaneous Structures 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O I $0 Wayfinding Sign Supports and Foundations 1 $8,167 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $8,167 Utility Protection Structures 1 $10,028 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 I I $10,028 Miscellaneous Retaining Walls 1 $8,167 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $8,167 Lighting Supports and Foundations 1 $8,167 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 $0 1 $8,167 9.06 AMclpated Structural Plan Sheets (Sheet Count 258) 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 I $0 General Notes and Abbreviations 1 $2,404 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $O 1 $2,404 General Plan and Elevation 1 $2,946 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 1 $2,946 Horizontal Control Plan 1 $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946 Construction Sequence (2 Sheets) 1 $5,893 $O I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,893 Foundation Layout 1 $2,404 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $2,404 Pile Details l $2.404 1 $0 i $0 1 $O 1 $O 1 $2,404 West Abutment Plan and Elevations I $2,946 I $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $O 1 $2,946 West Abutment Details I $2,404 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $2,404 East Abutment Plan and Elevations 1 $2,946 I $0 I 1 $0 1 $O 1 $2,946 East Abutment Details 1 $2,404 I $O I $0 1 $O 1 $O 1 $2,404 Superstructure Layout 1 $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $2,946 Arch Plan and Elevation Y $2,946 1 $0 I $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $2,946 Arch Sections (2 Sheets) I $4,807 I $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $4,807 Arch Details (3 Sheets) I $8,839 I $O I $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $8,839 Arch Tension Ties 1 $2,946 I $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946 Arch Tension Tie Details 1 $2,946 I $0 I $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $2,946 Deck Framing Plan and Elevation (2 Sheets) 1 $4,807 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,807 Deck Framing Plan 1 $2946 I $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946 Deck Sections (2 Sheets) 1 $4,807 I $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,807 Deck Details (2 Sheets) 1 $5,893 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 I $5,893 Arch Connection Details (3 Sheets) 1 $8,839 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 $0 I $8,839 Deck Vertical Support Layout (2 Sheets) 1 $5,893 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,893 Deck Vertical Support Sections (2 Sheets) 1 $5,893 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,893 Deck Vertical Support Details (2 Sheets) 1 $5,893 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,893 West Approach Plan and Elevation 1 $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946 West Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation 1 $2,946 1 $O I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2946 West Approach Superstructure Sections 1 $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946 West Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets) 1 $5,893 1 $0 I $O 1 $0 1 $0 I $5,893 West Approach Deck Sections 1 $2,946 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 I $2,946 West Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets) 1 $5,893 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $5,893 East Approach Plan and Elevation 1 $2,404 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $2,404 East Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation 1 $2,404 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,404 East Approach Superstructure Sections 1 $2,404 1 $0 I $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,404 East Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets) 1 $4,807 1 $0 I $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,807 East Approach Deck Sections 1 $2,404 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $2,404 East Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets) 1 $4,807 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,807 Miscellaneous Structures (2 Sheets) 1 $5,893 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,893 9.07 Deliverables 1 $O 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 30% PSE Submittal 1 $0 1 $0 I $O 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 30% PSE Plan Set 1 $724 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $724 Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Costs 1 $2,998 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $2,998 30% PSE QA/QC 1 I $10,545 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 I $0 1 I $10,545 60% PSE Submittal I $0 I 1 1 $0 I $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 60% PSE Plan Set 1 $724 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $724 Specification Outline I $1,137 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $1,137 Updated Quantities and Costs 1 $2,998 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 2,998 Responses to City 30% PSE Comments 1 $672 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $672 60% PSE OA/OC I $10,545 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $10,545 90% PSE Submittal I I $O I 1 I $0 1 I $0 1 1 $0 1 I $0 1 $0 90% PSE Plan Set 1 $724 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 $0 1 $724 Draft Specification 1 $6,410 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $6,410 Updated Quantities and Costs 1 $3,929 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $3,929 Responses to City 60% PSE Comments 1 $672 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $672 90% PSE QA/QC 1 $9,201 1 $0 1 $O 1 I $0 I 1 $0 1 I $9,201 Final PSE Submittal 1 I $0 I I 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 Final PSE Plan Set I $724 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $724 Final Specification 1 $2,223 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,223 Final Ouantbes and Costs I $1,602 1 I 1 $0 1 1 $1,602 Responses to City 90% PSE Comments I $207 1 $0 I $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $207 Final PSE QA/QC 1 $6,720 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $6,720 Reimbursablesl $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 Subtotal$ $469,544 1 $0 I $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $469,544 Matt 10.0 Bridge Aesthetics Collaboration (LMN) 10.01 Bridge Structure I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 Arch Geometry $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $19,342 1 $0 1 $19,342 Arch Color I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,012 1 $O 1 $1,012 Connections Susp Cables 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,012 1 $0 1 $1,012 Connections Bridge Deck $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,012 1 $0 1 $1,012 Connections Abutments 1 $0 $0 1 $0 1 $1,012 1 $0 1 $1,012 Connections Tied Arch 1 1 $0 1 $1,012 1 $0 1 $1,012 Page 3 of 4 222 KPFF Consulting Engineers FEE ESTIMATE: Co of Tukwila Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge KPFF Prime All Companies Management KPFF Civil KPG Ine. LMN Archhects Landau Associates Grand Total Structural Total Feel $517,100.92 1 $276,547,03 1 $230,851.52 1 $230.488.33 1 $132,592.31 1 $1.387,580.11 Task SCOPE OF WORK Connections Lateral Support l $O I $0 I $0 1 $1,012 1 $0 I $1,012 10.02 Approach Romps l $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 $0 Column Treatments Y $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,012 1 $0 1 $1,012 Superstructure Treatments 1 $O I $0 1 $0 1 $1,012 1 $0 1 $1,012 Deck Treatments 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1.012 1 $O 1 $1.012 Earthwall Treatments 1 $0 1 $0 1 1 $1,012 1 $O I $1,012 Handrail System 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $1,136 1 $O I $1,136 10.03 Draft Basis of Design Document 1 $0 I $0 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 10.04 30% Plan Set 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $4,482 1 $0 1 $4,482 10.05 30% PSE Debrief (with city) Y $O I $0 1 $0 1 $1,515 1 $0 1 $1,515 10.06 Architectural Sheets Design 1 $O I $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 Code Sheet 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,292 1 $0 1 $2,292 Elevations 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $4,844 1 $0 1 $4,844 Sections (2 sheets) 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $7,079 1 $0 1 $7,079 Connection Details (2 sheets) 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $7,079 1 $0 1 $7,079 Lighting Coordination 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $3,129 1 $0 1 $3,129 Approach Sections, East 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $5,054 1 $0 1 $5,054 Approach Secions, West 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $5,054 1 $0 1 $5,054 Handrail Details 1 $0 I $0 1 1 $5,333 1 $0 1 $5,333 Study Model Development 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $6,568 1 $0 1 $6,568 10.07 Final Basis of Design Document 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 10.08 60%Submtttal 1 $0 1 $0 I $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 60% Plan Set 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $9,446 1 $0 1 $9,446 Outline Specs 1 $O 1 $O 1 $0 1 $7,104 1 $0 1 $7,104 60% PSE Debrief (with city) l $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,955 1 $0 1 $1,955 City Comment Review /Response to 30% l $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,708 1 $0 1 $4,708 10.09 90 %Submittal l $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 90% Plan Set l $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $25,870 1 $0 I $25,870 Draft Specs Y $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $8,204 1 $0 1 $8,204 90% PSE Debrief (with city) 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,397 1 $0 I $1,397 City Comment Review /Response to 60% 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,331 1 $0 I $5,331 10.10 IDO%Submittal 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 100% Plan Set 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $10,484 1 $0 1 $10,484 Final Specs 1 80 1 $O 1 $0 1 $3,367 1 $O 1 $3,367 City Comment Review Response to 90% 1 $O $O 1 $0 1 $4,567 1 $O 1 $4,567 Reimbursablesl $O 80 1 $0 1 $2,500 1 $0 1 $2,500 1 1 r I I 1 Subtotall $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $167,955 1 $O 1 $167,955 ci rr 1 i1.0 Urban Dsslgn and Way Finding 11.01 Illumination 1 $0 I $0 1 $42,607 1 $0 1 $0 1 $42,607 11.02 Wayfinding Furnishings Signal 1 $0 I $0 1 $19,382 1 $0 1 $0 1 $13,382 1103 Landscaping and irrigation 1 $0 1 $0 1 $27,879 1 $0 1 $0 1 $27.879 11.04 Walkway Select ion /Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies 1 $0 1 $0 I $17,217 1 $0 I $0 1 $17,217 Reimbursablesl $0 1 $0 l $500 l $0 l $0 1 $500 Subtotall $0 1 $0 1 $101,586 1 $0 1 $0 1 $101,586 diiw v, w,w,l 12.0 Types, Size. and Location Report (Complete) 1 $0 I $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 ReimbursableM $0 1 $0 I $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 1 Y 1 1 Y Subtotall $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 is,.,i,�, ..:,,s a„ „a,,,A11.A'.1,,,,,, „w. E i m u 13.0 S!Pal Design n 13.01 VJSDOT Coordination 1 $0 I $0 1 $8,496 1 $0 1 $0 1 $8,496 13.02 PetlesVian Signal Across West Valley Highway Design 1 $0 I $0 1 $21,855 1 $0 1 $0 1 821,855 13.03 Signal Modifications at Andover Park E &Baker Blvd 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,283 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,283 Reimbursablesl $0 l $0 l $1,000 $0 1 $0 1 $1,000 1 1 1 1 1 I Subtotall $0 1 $0 1 $35,634 Y $0 1 $O 1 $35,634 14.0 Rlghtof -Way Services 14.01 Legal Description I $0 1 $0 I $1,551 1 $O 1 $O 1 $1,551 14.02 Right-of-Way Plan I $0 I $0 1 $9,776 1 $O 1 $O 1 $9,776 14.03 Title Reports 1 $0 1 $0 I $10,119 1 $O 1 $O 1 $10.119 Reimbursablesl $0 1 $0 I $2,000 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,000 eubtotall $0 1 $0 l $23,446 1 $0 1 $O 1 $23,446 M :.�3�. ,:,..:.i 3' _.}°#h -aii .:�t 15.0 Construction Support Services 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 Y $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $o Reimbursablesl $0 l $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O Subtotall $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 Total $517.100.92 1 $275,547.03 1 $210.851.52 1 $230.488.33 1 $132.592.31 1 $1.367,580.11 Page 4 of 4 223 FEE6TIMATE CByef Tukwla Tukwila Urben Center, Pedastlan/allyAe Bridge prima Management 6 Struohmal EngInearina OGIM Task [.COPEOFVARK LO Proisct Menelfemard ark Adminiatratron 101 Prolecl Schedule 102 Design Team Supplemental Agreements 103 Progress Reports 104 lnvmces 105 Team Meebngs(Msume 12 meetings& 3 City WOrWhops) Consultant Meetings w/ Cm, (Assume 12 meebng) Consultant Internal Meetings (ASSUme 12 meeting) cse!Sc is Coalment 201 Uesi¢n Criteria Cm, 2.02 Design Criteria Final 3.0 Tommgqraphlo erM BOYndatL 'Survey (KKa &KPFF GMp oPVg_apfiie maPPing.n;,e f 302 Topograpmc Mapping Phase2 303 Survey Base Review »L. rielduWuWL�'n�r;d�o' aiury ile �l�g 402 cal tvaivauon. nepbrting. and Meeungs 403 newewm neponan. --me o. MVdrp.".1 -i- Chn" 501 Meetwith AFenc 5.02 Establish SOOyear Floodplaln 5.03 Establish S[huRUral Clearance oti, Ner ,e�ry.an�.re�,.burz�e�>„�a�,�x�, arvrru.rn 602 Scrn �liecsirsr 603 Wswi local rrograms cw 604 Aires, E- mrimen.ai SK. m in um enc 605 diologicar usessmonisN 6.W Guiwrai rcesources irivesugau0n 607 inoreirn Leann 609 Wo,, /waterway) ouneauon 6.09 nepon 6.10 m wcumencs 6.11 NA- 612 Aquzlic canas casement 7.0 PrObeIWOrWIwpe 1.01 Intemat Team PSE Kick-0tf Meetng 702 TSL Review &Project Kok -Off Meeting 703 Tied Arch Concept Workshop Tied Arch Alternatives Graphics T04 West antl East Approach Concept Workshop West Approach East Approach 7.05 Final Concept Selection Workshop Connection Detail Sketches Suface Finish Examples Color Examples Study Model Development Sketch Up OuaIm, Renderings (6) 706 Public Outreach Graphics 8.0 CMI En�Jneei 8.01 Concept Workehopand PreferredMSeleellon 8 02 Site Pap and Demolition 803 Xorlsordel and VerUsal Layout Route Layout Horizontal Control Ramptransaions Vertical Alignment vehicular Crossing of Trail Rechannelization Baker St Riverview Plata C,weway ReconSlrucDOn 804 Shading and Pcving Terrain Model Typical Sec2inn Codid with KCFD and USACE 8.05 TTSO 806 Surface Water TIR Site Drainage Infiltratron 807 Utlitiee Ciryand Rel Private oca tlorls Franchise UDldy Co, dma- Seatbe Public Utility Coordination 908 Caannellsationand Siding Parking Lot Revisions Roatlway Signing Riverview Plaza Panting Lot Circulabon Study Rechann¢lization Sake, St 8.09 Coat EStrmele 30% 6096 90% Final 8.10 Spedficartmx 60960unins 9096 Special Provisions r I I I, IE I ReimDUrsables• 1 i Y E I E I i i r 1 Suldatal- O.0 r Ut r U.0 0.0 00 O.O I 0.0 r 00 a r E 1 8.0 I Project Senior Design I Design 1 I 8.0 I Prot I I I Mu1501ier I 1$ 1 8.0 I Principal Manager Engineer Engineer ll Engineer) 1 Technician Coorcmator I 1 1$ 1 I 80 I 80 I I I 80 I I 1 1E 1 I 1 1 I I I I 2.5846 l I I I 65W I fi0.00I 45.001 40001 E 40001 35001 20.001E 1800 Reimb. 8.0 I Cantrell krestunt 1 I 240 I I I I 24.0 I I 1$ 4.962.a3 1 I 40 I I I I 120 I I 1 1E i$ 1240.61 1 I 120 I I 1 24.0 I I$ I 3.101.52 1 I 120 I I I 240 I I I I I 3.101.52 1 8.0 80 I I I 160 1 1 1 E 1 I 24.0 240 1 I 1 1$ Ralmbursabl,,F 6513.19 1 I 240 240 I I I I I 1 I I I$ 6,513.19 ReimbursablesFr 1 1 i 1 rl 1 1 1$ 0.0 is 1 I I I I I 1 I I i Suhtalelr 0.0 1 100.0 1 48.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 84.0 1 0.0 I S I E 2543246 r l 2.0 I 14.0 I l 1 I 1 5 3.10151 ReimDUrsaDl¢s.. 2.0 1 8.0 1 I 1 1 t I b I E 1 E 1.24061 1 Subtotal• UU 40 r 32.0 I 00 r 00 r U.0 I OU I 00 r� 1 a 4.14113 I i l I r IE r Reimbursabl W Su s,aal• l I I i i O.O I 0.0 r U,O I I 0.0 I 1 r r I r I I I I I I I I l I r r r r 1E 1$ HeimDursablesh Subotal• r,Y `i i„ U.O r 00 I U.O i.. ...�.iinl U.0 r 00 I 1 U.0 1 U.0 1 r I I I I I 1E I I HeimbursaDlesr SuMatal• 1 i U.0 I 00 I O.0 I 1 UU r 00 r r r U.0 I 1 a 0.0 I 00 r E I r I E 1 I I l 1E r I I I 1E I I I I I I I I l 1E 1E r 1 I I l i I I 1 l I IE 1E r I I I, IE I ReimDUrsables• 1 i Y E I E I i i r 1 Suldatal- O.0 r Ut r U.0 0.0 00 O.O I 0.0 r 00 a r E 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 2.377.83 2.377.83 2894 75 2894.75 3.618 44 3,61844 1 17.78205 224 Page, pro 1 8.0 I 8.0 I I I 4.0 1 1 1$ 1 I 8.0 I 8.0 I I I 4.0 1 I 1$ 1 1 8.0 I 8.0 I I 8,0 I I 1 I$ 1 I I I I I I 1 1$ 1 I 80 I 80 I I I 80 I I 1 1E 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 1E l I I I I I I I 1 IE 1 I 8.0 I 8.0 I I 1 16.0 I I 1 1 E 1E 1 I I I I I I 1 1E I I I I I 1 I$ 1 I I I I 1 1$ 1 I I I I I I 1 1 IE 1 8.0 80 I I I 160 1 1 1 E I I I I 1 1$ Ralmbursabl,,F I I I I 1 1 Subtotal 0.0 1 480 1 480 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 48.0 1 8.0 1 0.0 is 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 2.377.83 2.377.83 2894 75 2894.75 3.618 44 3,61844 1 17.78205 224 Page, pro FEEE:51MATE CladTukwila Tukwila Urben CerMer. PedeelMin Bipyale Bridge Prime Management A Strup4nel Engineedryl (KPM Task SCOPEOFWORK Final Special Provisions 811 Raroheeb 3D96 Site Prepar (4 sheets) TESC Ran. (4 sheers) Road., Sections (1 sheet) Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) Drainage (4 sheets) Utility 13 sheers) Channellzation and Signing (3 sheeb) QC Review 60% Site Preparation (4 sheets) TESC Plans (4 sheets) TESL Detail (1 sheet) Roadway Sectons (1 sheet) Plan /Prohle Shell. (3 sheets) Paving Detail (1 shell) 0ralnage (4 sheets) Dramage Detail (1 sheet) Utility (3 sheets) Utillry Detail (1 sheet) Channellzation and signing (4 sheets) Channellzation Detail (1 Sheer) QC Review 9096 Site Preparabon (4 sheets) TESC Plans (4 sheets) TESC Detail (1 sheet) Roadway Sections (1 sheet) Plan /Prohle Sheets (3 sheets) Paw Deta (1 sheet) Drainage (3 sheets) Drainage Detail (1 sheep Utility (3 sheets) UVlity Detail (1 sheet) channel Ration and signing (4 sheets) Ch an Detail (1 Sheet) QC Review 1009 Site Prap.nR.n (4.heets) TESL Plans (4 sheets) TESC Detail (1 sheet) Roadway Sections (i sheet) Plan /Prohle Sheets (3 sheets) Paving Detail (1 sheet) Drainage (4 sheets) Drainage Detail (1 sheet) Wiry (3 sheets) Utillry Detail (1 sheep Channellzation and Signing (4 sheets) Channehzatmn Detail (1 sheet) QC Review Final Bid Set Site Preparation (4 sheets) TESL Plans (4 sheets) TESC Detail (1 sheet) Roadway sections (i sheet) Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheeb) Paving Detail (1 sheet) Drainage (4 sheeb) Drainage Detail 4 sheet) UVliry(3.he..) Utillry Detail (1 sheet) Channelizah" and Signing (4 sheets) Channelization Detail (1 sheet) QC Reriew Pro9ect Senior Design Design Proj -U"P"' Principal Manager Engineer Engineer ll Engineer) CADTe hnician Coortlinator Atlmin 2.5846 E 65001 60.001 S 45001 40,001 40001 35.001 20.001 1800 Rentals. I I I I I I I r h I i I I I I I E I I I I I I I F M I I I 1 I I I r Y I i I I I I I r 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 4 I I I I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I M 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Reimbursablesl M I I Subta ll 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 I F I 1 I F 1 15 r 1 0.0 1$ Contract Amsum 19S 1E 1s IE 1$ {E 1$ {E IE 1$ {E 1$ E {E 1$ {E 1$ 1$ 1$ 1$ l$ 1S !E Is 1E IE I$ I$ IS IE 1$ 1$ 1E 1E 1$ {E 1$ I$ 1E I$ 1E IE I$ IS l$ 9$ 7$ 1$ 9$ !E 15 is IS 1$ 1$ IS IE {g 1$ f$ 1S Is IS 9.0 Stn bal Ehfneedna(KPFFI 901 Seeks a-to 1 I 20 40 I I I 20 I 1' 1E 878,76 902 Bridge Dealgn DeeDFOUndatlOnS Y I 16.0 800 I 80.0 1 I I I 1$ 20,056.50 West Abutment I I 80 I 400 I 400 I I I 1 1$ 1002825 East Abutment 1 I 80 I 40.0 40.0 I I I 1 I -1 10.02825 Arch Steel Pipes I 1 160 1 80.0 1 40.0 1 1 I I 1 1$ 15.92116 Arch Abutment Connectmns I 1 8.0 1 20.0 I 200 1 1 1 I i1 5634.43 1 Tension T­ 1 I 16.0 1 40.0 1 40.0 1 I I I$ 11.268.86 Arch Miscellaneous COnnecbons I I 8.0 I 20.0 I 200 I I I IE 5.634 d3 Deck Superstructure Framing I 1 8.0 I 20.0 1 400 I I I I 1 I S 7.702.11 Deck Slab I I 80 1 20.0 I 400 I I I 1 I S 7.702.11 Deck Hantl Railing I I 8.0 1 200 I 400 I I I I 1 1 E 7.702.11 Arch Suspension Hangers 1 I 160 1 800 1 800 I I I I 1 1$ 20.05650 903 West Approach Ramp Deeign I I I I I I I I 1 1E Shaft F- cl.wn. I I 160 I 400 I 400 I I I 1 1 IE 11.26886 Concrete COW- I I 80 400 I 400 I I I 1 1$ 10.028.25 SVUpturai Earth Walls 1 8.0 I 400 I 400 i I I I 1 I$ 10.02825 Steel Su perstructurs I 160 1 400 1 400 I 1 I I 1 11.26886 Deck Slab I 80 I 400 I 40.0 I I I I 1 1 E 10.028.25 Hand Railings I 80 400 I 400 I I I I 1 1$ 10.028.25 9.04 ErMAppmach Ramp Deeigrl Shaft Foundations 1 8.0 1 20.0 I 20.0 1 I I I 1 -1 5.634.43 Concrete COlumne 1 I 8.0 1 200 1 200 1 1 I I 1 7$ 5.634.43 Slrpct I Earth Wall. 1 8.0 200 1 20.0 I 1 1 I 1 'I S 5.634.43 Steel Superstructure 1 8.0 1 400 I 400 I I I 1 1$ 10.028.25 Deck Slab 1 I 8,0 I 200 I 20.0 I 1 I 1 1 S 5.634.43 Hand Railings 1 I 8.0 200 I 20.0 I 1 1 1 1 E 5.634.43 905 Mlecellerroous smzeorm 1 I I I I I I l I S WayfndingSignSUpp orts and F- dations 1 1 8.0 240 I 400 I 1 1 1 1 1E 8.167.34 tmkry ProteRion SVUCturea 1 I 8.0 I 400 1 400 I 1 I 1 1 I I IE 10.02825 Miscellaneous Retaining Walls I I 8.0 1 24.0 400 I I I 1 1$ 8.167.34 lighting Supports and Fountla[ions I I 8.0 I 24.0 40.0 I 1 I I 1 .1 E 8.167.34 9.06 4welpaled Structural Ransheela( Sheet COUnt258) 1 I I I I I 1 1 1$ Generalti -and Abbre,heams I 1 2.0 I 40 I I I 18.0 1 1 q 1$ 2.40368 Page 2 of 4 225 FEEESTIMATE Cltyaf Tukwila Tukwila urban Centx. Pedw1TarVBkxla Bridge Pd.. Management& ShicMel BV-dng(KPFF) Mojad Senior Design Design Proj. Multiplies Principal Manager Engineer CAD Engineer'' Engineer' Technician Coonlinatar Atlmin 25846 Task SCOPEOFMORK E 65001 E 60.001E 45001 E 40.001E 40001 35001 20.001E 1800' Re'mb. General Plan and Elevabon I 20 40 1 1 1 240 I I t Horitontal Control Plan 1 I 2.0 40 1 I 1 240 I I F Constuctlon Sequence (25heets) I I 4.0 I 80 I 480 Layout Foundation t 1 1 2 0 4.0 I I I 18.0 Pile Details 1 1 2 0 4.0 I I I 18 0 Abutment ati West ent Plan and Eleons M 1 20 I 40 I I I 24.0 West Abutment Details M 1 20 I 40 I I I 180 East AW-1: Plan and Elevations M 1 20 40 I I I 24.0 East Abutment Details I 1 1 4 0 I I I 180 I I 1 Superstructure L-1 I 1 2.0 1 4o I 1 I 240 Arch Plan and Elevation h 1 20 1 40 I 1 I 240 I I 1 Arch Sections (2 Sheets) 1 I 40 I 8 0 I I I 36.0 I I I Ar Details(3Sheets) 1 I 6 0 12.0 I I I 72.0 I I 1 Arch Tension Ties 1 1 2.0 40 I I I 240 1 I t Arch Tension Tie Details 1 2.0 40 I I I 240 1 1 1 Deck Framing Man and El (2 Shee6) 1 1 40 80 I I 1 360 I I t Deck Framing Man I I 2 0 4.0 I I I 24 0 I I 1 Deck Sections (2 Sheets) 1 1 40 1 80 1 I 1 360 I 1 1 Deck Details (2 Sheets) 1 1 4.0 80 I 1 I 4 I 1 1...... Arch Connection Data8(3Sheets) 1 1 60 1 120 I I I 72.0 I I U Deck Vert cal Support layout (2 Sheets) 1 I 40 80 I 1 1 480 I I 1 Deck Vert cal SUppod Sections l2 Sheets) 1 I 40 80 I 1 480 Deck Velical Support Dtert. (2 Sheets) 1 I 4.0 80 I I I 480 I I 1 West Approach Plan and Elevabon 1 I 20 I 40 I 1 I 24.0 I I 1: West Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation 1 1 20 4 I I 1 240 West Approach Superstructure Sections 1 1 2 0 1 4, 0 I I I 24.0 1 I I West Approach Superstructure Claris(25hele) I I 40 1 80 I 1 I 48.0 I 1 1 West Approach Deck Sections 1 1 2 0 1 4 0 I I I 24.0 I I 1 West Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets) 1 1 4 0 1 8 0 I I I 48.0 1 I 1 East Approach' Plan and Elevation 1 I 20 40 I I I 180 I 1 1 East Approach Fountlati- Plan and Elevation 1 I 20 40 I I I 180 I I 1 East Approach Superstructure Sections 1 20 d0 I 1 1 180 I 1 t East Approach Superstrucure Deta'IS (2 Sheets) 1 1 40 80 I 1 I 36.0 I I East Approach Deck Sections 1 1 2.0 4 0 I I I 18.0 I I 1 East Approach Deck Estella (2 Sheets) 1 I dO 1 80 I I I 36.0 I Mecellaneous Structures(2Sheets) 1 I 40 80 I I 480 907 Dallvarables 306 ME SUbmkN 30%3E Plan Set M I I I I I 80 Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Costs h 1 I 24.0 I I I I 4,0 1 F' 30%3E QA/QC I 320 I 240 I 1 I 16.0 I I k 606 ME SUbmbtal 1 I I 1 I I I P 60% 3E Plan Set Spec'bcation Outline 1 I 8 0 1 I 1 I 4 0 1 I Updated Quantities and Costs 1 1 2 I I I I 40 1 1 Responses to City 30% ME Comments 1 1 1 4 0 I I I I 4.0 1 1 60%PSE QA/QC 1 320 1 240 1 I I 1 tS0 I 1 1 W% ME SUbmltal 90463E Plan Set I I I I I 8.0 I I Dr aft Specibcaton M 1 I 480 1 I 1 I 16.0 Updated Quantities and Costs M 1 1 320 1 i 1 I dO I F Rasp me, W City 60% 3E Comments I I 40 I I I 40 I k 90%3E QA/QC 1 240 24.0 I I I 1 160 1 I F` 1 I I I I I I I 1 Fl al ME Submittal I I I I I I I I F Final ME Plan Set I I I I I I 8 0 I I 1 Final Spec, /icabon I 1 12.0 I 1 I 1 16.0 I 1 Final Quantities and Costs 1 I 120 1 I 1 I 4.0 I 1 Responses to City 90ei ME Comments 1 I I I I 1 4.0 1 f Final ME QA/QC 1 240 1 8.0 1 I I 1 160 1 I ReimbursablesY _:.1 1 I A 1 1 E I Subtotal l 112 0 1 454.0 I I 1 1340.0 1 1020.0 1 0.0 I 278 1.0 1 I 66.0 1 0.0 I S 10.0 Bridge Aaemateas Qllawmw (LMN7 10.01 Brldgs SbucNfe A Glens" 1 I I I 1 I I I k Arch Color Connections Susp cables 1 I 1 I I I I 4 Connections Bridge Deck 1 I I I I I I t Connections- Abutments 1 I I I I I I 1 connections red Arch Connection s. Lateral support M I I I I 1 f 10.02 Approseh Ramps I I I I I I I 6 Col amn T-tmenta SupemtruRUre Treatments I I I I I I I 1 Deck rrno -sts I I I I I I I k Earthw WI reatments 1 I I I I I I f Handrail S»em 10.03 Dreeeeslaof Design Cim 10.04 3 Filanset 1005 30%3EDebrM (wlM elp9 I I I I I I I C: 1006 Artl'hacW.lSheets /Design Code sheet I I I I I I Elevations I I I I I I k Sections l2 sheets) I I I I I I I f cpnnect'on Decals (2 sheets) I I I I I I 1 1 L'ghtng COO rd' -tion I I I I I I I 1 F Approach Sections. East 1 1 I 1 I I I I I Approach secitons, West Handrail Details 1 1 I I I I I I Study Model Development I I I I I I I I 1 1007 Flnel Bae1e of Das1gn Document I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1006 6 Submmal 1 I I I 1 I I I F 60% Ran Set I 1 I I 1 I I I I- 0bt1mescees 6063E Debrief swim city) Ciry Comment Review/Responsetc30e6 1009 9o%submktal I I I I I I I I F 90%Plan set 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 D.an specs 1 I I I I I I I 1 9063E Debrief(wsh city) Ciry Comment Review Response to 606 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 06 10.10 10 sulanl6el I I I I I I I I 1 ID Plan at 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 Final Specs 1 I I I I I I I f orltreQAmount 2.94644 1 2.946 44 5.89289 2.40368 2.403.68 2.946.44 2.403.68 2.946.44 2.403.69 1 2.946 44 2.946 44 4.807.36 8.839.33 2.94644 294644 777 4,807.36 2.946 44 4,80].36 5.89289 8.839.33 5.892.89 5.892 89 5.892.89 2.946.44 2.946.44 294644 5.892.89 2 946 44 5,892 89 2,403 68 240368 2 403 68 4.80] 36 2.403 68 4.80] 36 5.892.89 ]2369 2.99814 10.54517 72369 1.13].22 2.99814 672.00 10 545.17 72369 6.409.81 3.928.59 672.00 9 201.18 72369 2222,76 1,602.45 206.77 6719.96 469,544.28 Page 3 of 4 226 FEEESTIMATB Cltyct Tukwga Tukwila Urban Center. Petlmbtar4/Bicycle Mega Prime Management& Stmobrtel Eaginaadng(KPFF) Project 1 Senior Design Design Proj. Mu1t101"" I I P(InclPai Maineer ,age, Engineer Eng ll En GAD I Engineer Technician Coordinator 2.5946 r Tmk ISCOPEOF WORK T-1 I E 65.001E 60.00 S 45001 S 40001 40001 E 35001 20.00 S 1800 Reimb. C nt SAm.m On, Comment Review/Response W 9096 I I I I I I I 1':y" 1E Reinnti. -blesn 1 I 1 1 ^'LS I Subtlrfal 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 Is 1 E 110 Urban Design and Way Finding 11.01 Ili"m neon 1 I I I I I 1 I E 11.02 Wayfnd'nR Furnishings Sgnal 11.03 Landscaping and Irrigation 1 I I I I 1 I I D 1E 1104 Walkway Selection /Perking Lot Trail Man- Studies r I I 1 I i I I w 1E Reimbursabksl 1 1 SuMOm lr 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 i 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 S 120 T9oes. Size. and loee8on RePOt (COMPlate) 1 I I I I I I I w 1E Rdmbursabl.lM E IS Subtetall 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 t 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1$ Is 13.0 Signal Design 1301 WSDOTCOOrdination 13.02 Pe des toan Signal Across Welt 1 "Ileyllighwayl3eagn 1303 Signal Modticannns at And Park E& Baker BIM. E R- bursablesl Subtatelt 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 S IS 14.0 RlpMafWay SeMOee 1401 Legal Description 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1. 1E 1402 Rightof -Way Plan 1 1 I I I I I F: IE 1403 Title Reports Reimbursablesl s:��: I 7 1 1 1� 1 A E I E r I I I Y 1 Subtotel 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 is 15.0 Combustion Support SeMcse Reimbursablesr 1 t 1 a r 1 1 E s 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 Subtotal 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 00 is is Tall Hours 1120 GM.0 1458.0 1020.0 0.0 1328.0 558.0 0.0 S E 517.10092, 1 S 517100.82 I Page 4 of 4 7 2 21 FEEESTIMATE C@rofTukwlla Tukwila Urban Carter. Pede tnan/Bicycie Bridge Chru Englneming(KPFF) Project Senior Project Design Fro7, Multiplier Pnncipal Manager Engineer Engineer CAD Engineer Technidan ite,dinator Achill 2.5846 Task SOOPEOFWORK 66001 50.001 5000 42.001E 38001 S 35001' 22.001 1800 Reimb. ConIrolS AmourR ai mm�n 4nm41 v tit ume�i II'kl fyouuuS IIJ UUa .9sq :In TI'aa.T sava 1.0 Prolex Management am Administration 1.01 Proiex Schedule I I 1 I I I `I 102 Design Team Supplemental Agreements I I I I I I I I;. '1 E I 103 Progress Reports I I 1 I I I I I II 1.04 Invoices 1$ 1.05 Team Meetings (Assume 12 meetings 3 City Workshops) CpnsvltentMeetings w City(Assume 12 meeting) 1 I 18.0 1 I I I I li 1$ 2.326.14 Consultant Internal Meetings( Assume 12 meeting) 1 I 24.0 I I I 1 I 1 i$ 3.10152 Reimbursables, r�I i �i I 1'E 1'E i I I I I 1 z Subtotal) 0.0 I 420 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 00 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 is I 5.427.66 20 Beall Criteria Document 2.01 Design Criteria Draft 1 8.0 I 1 240 1 I 80 I A$ 4.09401 202 Design Cnteria Final M 1 8.0 1 16.0 I 1 40 I 1 _i$ 2.998.14 Reimbursabtesk, I 1: r I 1 I E 1 Subtotell 0.0 1 16.0 1 0.0 1 40.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 120 1 0.0 I S I 7.092.14 °4°°^';;a�x °px,. ,v�,,,.,,���� °e „��n,m,.,w tu U a 3.0 Topogzapldc and Boundary Survey(KPG&KPFF Clyi6 301 Topographic Mapping Phase l I I I I I 1 I 1 IS 302 Topographic Mapping Phase 2 y I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1$ 303 Survey Base Review M 1 16.0 1 I 160 I 8.0 1 I 1 1$ 4528.22 Fall ..sables# I _.1 i, 1 S 1 I I I I I I I I 1 Subtotal( 0.0 1 180 1 0.0 I 16.0 1 0.0 1 8.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 S I 4,528 22 4.0 Geotechnlcal Research and RecanmeMatlom 4.01 Field Explorations and Laboratory Testing I I I I I 1, 'IS 4.02 Geotechnical Evaluation. Reporting. and Meetings 4.03 Review of Report and Comments M I 16.0 I I I 1 20 I I 1$ 2.181.40 Reimbursablesl 1$ 1 I 1 1 1 Subtastai 0.0 I 16.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 20 I 0.0 1 l 2.181.40 ^,9 „u �o,a. .T°;�: k ���.�'�a6= ����m: ��p„� „��az ����'1#4 5.0 Htdnullm(KPFFCIVll7 501 Meet with Agencies 1 I 16.0 I I I 160 1 1 1'E 351506 5.02 Establish 100 -year Floodplain I I 16.0 I 40 I 1 16.0 1 1 1$ 3949.27 503 Establish Structural Clearance 1 I 8.0 1 1 I I I 8.0 I 1 J$ 1.48873 Reimbursableslli;:r'; 1 J ,.P .,.__f 1 ig I$ Subtotal) 0.0 I 40.0 I 0.0 I 4.0 0.0 I 32.0 I 8.0 I 0.0 1'E I 8.953.05 6.0 Emlronmental end Penngting Serdom(Landeu& KPFFCIvID II „,°3° 6.01 Team. Agency, and Pre Application Meetings E 6.02 SEPA Checklist I I 40 I I I 16.0 1 I 1 I$ 2088.36 6.03 WSDOT Local Programs ECS 1 I 4.0 I 1 8.0 I I 1 I 1 1$ 1.385.35 604 Phase l Env'_ anal Site Assessment 1 I I I I I I 1 I$ 605 Biological Assessmenf/EFH 1 1 40 I 160 I I 160 I I 1'E 3.701.15 6.06 Cultural Resources Investigation I I 1 I I I 1 J$ 6.07 Shoreline Permit I I 40 I 80 I I 8.0 1 1$ 2.10903 608 Wetland/Waterway Delineation I I I I I I 1 J 6.09 Critical Areas Report I 1 80 I 80 I I 160 1 1'E 3.34964 6.10 Mitigation Construction Documents 611 IARPA I I 4.0 I I I 80 I I 1 E 1.240.61 6.12 Aquatic Larks Easement 1 1 1 Reimbursablesl I 1 J- .I I ..................1 I Subtotal1 0.0 I 28.0 0.0 1 40.0 1 16.0 1 48.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 S 1 13.874.13 .,l 'i,w ,�uzj, 7.0 ProlxtWOrWhom OS Internal Team PSE Kick -0K Meeting M I 8.0 I I I I 1 I 1' E 1.033.84 ].02 TSL Review& Project K,l Meeting I I 8.0 I I I I I 11$ 103384 7.03 Tied Arch Concept Workshop y I 8.0 1 1 I 1 I 1$ 1.033.84 Tied Arch Alternatives Graphics I I I I 1 I I I 1$ 7.04 West and East Approach Concept Workshop N I 8.0 1 I 1 1 I 1$ 1.033.84 West Approach I I I I I I I I 1$ East Approach 7.05 Final Concept Selection Workshop I 1 8.0 I 1 I I I 1 J$1 1.033.84 Connexion Detail Sketches I I I I I I E I I 1$ Surface Finish Examples I I I I I I I I 1'$ Color Examples I I I I I I I 1 1$ Study Model Development J I I I I 1 1 I 1$ Sketch Up Quality Rendering, (6) I I 1 1 1'E I 706 Pubkc Outreach I I 8.0 1 I I I 1 I$ 1,03384 Graph,. I I 1 I 1 I I 1$ RembursablesMi.. 1 I I 1 1$ 1$ 1 I I I Subtomll 0.0 1 48.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 S I 6.20304 8.0 CMI Englnear 8.01 Concept Workshop and Preferred Aft Selection 1 I 160 16.0 I I 16.0 I 40 I 1$ 5.479.35' 8.02 She Prep and Demolition 1 I 8.0 I 16.0 I 160 I I I 1 4.342.13 8.03 Horizontal and Vertical layout 1 I I I I I I 1 Roule Layout 1 I 8.0 1 80 1$ 1.902.2] Horizontal Control 1 1 4.0 1 8.0 I I I I 1$ 1,385.35 Ramp transitions 1 I 8.0 I I 1 16.0 I I I I 1'E 2,60528 Vertical Alignment J 1 8.0 I 4.0 I 40 I I I I IS 186091 Vehicular Crossing of Tree J 1 8.0 80 I 80 I I I$ 2.68798 Rechannelization Baker Sit 1 I 160 I I 160 I 8.0 I 160 1 I 1$ 6,037.63 Riverview Plaza Driveway Reconstruction J 1 160 I 160 1 160 I 16.0 I I 1 :1$ 6.823.34 804 Greding end Paving J I I I I 1 I I I 1$ Terrain Model I I 4.0 I 80 I 160 I I 1 1$ 2.956.78 Typealsexion 1 I 80 I 8.0 I I 1 '1$ 1.819.56 Cocrd with KCFD and USACE 1 I 160 I 20 I 8.0 I 1 1 l$ 2.987801 8.05 TESC 1 I 160 1 I 32.0 1 I 1 1$ 5.210.55 8.06 Surface Weter I I I I I I 1 1$ TI R I 40 1 160 I 320 1 1 16.0 16.0 1 I 1$ 8,570.53 Site Drainage I 1 160 I 160 1 4.0 1 I t 1'E 4.197 ,391 Infiltration 1 I 8.0 1 1 160 I 8.0 I 80 I I 1 E 4,280.101 807 Wlrom I dry antl Private Relocations 1 I 8.0 1 1 I 160 1 I I I 1$ 2.605.281 Franchise Utility Coordination 1 I 8.0 I I I 80 I I 1 1$ 1.81956 Page 1 of 4 228 FEEESTIMATE C10'of7ukwlls Tukwila Urban Center. PedeeWaryBlcyde Bridge Civil Enginmdng(KPFF) P Project Senior o ove .sign C Multiplier I I I Principal 1 1AS P E ng a E CAD T Technician Coordinator A Adrnin M 25846 Teak 8COPEOFWORK S S 65.001 50.001 50001 4 42.001 38.001 3 35001 E 2 22001 E 18.00 R Reimb, I I Corrtm2Amoulrt Seattle Public Utility Coordination I I 1 1 160 I I I 160 I 1 16.0 I 4 4.0 I 1 1; I I$ 5.313.94 Boa Channdkstion and signing 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1! I I$ P ParkingLotRevisions I I I I 160 I I 1 16.0 I I 320 I I I 4 40 I F F 1 1$ 7.174.85 Roadway Signing 1 1 I I I 1 I I 2.0 I I I 1 1$ 196.431 Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Circulation Study I I I I 160 1 I 1 160 I I 160 I 8 8.0 I I I I$ 6,099661 Rechannelization Baker St I I I I 8.0 1 I 8 80 I I 16.0 I 8 8.0 I I y y 1 1 4.197.391 I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1$ 1 8.09 Coat F bmate I 1 2 20 1 1 80 I I I I 16o I I I N N 1 1$ 2.941271 60% 1 1 2 2.0 I I 12.0 I I I 320 I I I I I E E 5.029.63 g0y6 I I 2 2.0 I I 80 I I 8 80 I I 16.0 I I I I I I II 3.809.70 Final 1 1 1 1.0 I I 8.0 I 8 80 I I 16.0 I I I I I 1 1. 1 1$ 3.641.70 5.1D Specifications 1 1 I I I I I I I I, I I I II 60 %OUthne 1 1 I I 80 1 1$ 1.033.84 90% Special Provisions I I 1 1.0 I I 160 I I 1 120 I I I I I 9 90 I I II 3.993.21 Final Special Provisions 1 1 2 2.0 1 1 16.0 1 8 8.0 I I I I I 8 8.0 I 1 1 {E 3,72699 8.11 Plarobee, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II 1 1$ 30% I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1$ Site Preparation (4arcane) I I I I 4 0 I 1 1 160 I 1 160 I I I 3.53573 TESL Plans (4 sheets) 1 1 I I 2.0 I I I I 160 I 1 160 I I 1 1 E 3.277.27 Roadway Sections (I sheet) I I 1 1 4.0 I I 2 20 8 8.0 I S SO I I I F F 2.24343 Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I I I I 10 I I 8 80 I I 80 I 1 16.0 I I I f f$ 3 3,23075 Drainage (4 sheets) 1 1 I I 80 I I 1 16.0 1 1 1 160 I I f f 4,218.07 Utility (3 sheets) 1 1 I I 1.0 1 I 2 2.0 8 80 8 80 I I I F F {E 1,85574 Channehzation and Signing (3 sheets) 1 1 I I 1.0 I I 1 16.0 I 1 16.0 I I I N N I I$ 3.14804 QC Review 1 1 8 80 1 1 160 I 8.0 I 1 1 1 160 1 5.355.29 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IE '60% I I I I I I I I I I I I F F I I1$ Site Preparation (4 sheets) 1 1 I I 20 I I I 12.0 I 1 16.0 I I I 1 1 I I E 7 TESC Plans (4 sheets) 1 1 I I 1.0 I I 1 1 120 I 1 16.0 I I I I 7 2 TESC Detail (1 sheet) 1 1 I I 1.0 I 1 1 1 81 I 1 16.0 I I I 1 1 E 2.36232 Roadway Sections(1 sheet) 1 1 I I 2.0 I I I I 8.0 I a a.0 I I I F F 1 1$ 1.767.87 Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) 1 1 I I 1.0 I I 8 8.0 I I 160 1 1 16.0 I I I P P 1 1$ 4.01647 Paving Detail (1 Sheet) 1 1 I I 4.0 I I I I 8.0 I 8 8.0 I I I F F I IE ?026.33 Drainage (4 sheets) 1 1 I I 4.0 I 1 160 1 1 1 16.0 I I I 1 1 3.70115 Drainage Detail (1 sheet) 1 1 I I 2.0 I I 8 80 1 1 8 80 I I f f 1 1$ 1.850.57 Utility (3 sheets) y y I I 2.0 I I 8 80 1 8 80 I I I 1 1 I IE 1.16181 Utikly Detail (1 sheet) 1 1 I I 2.0 I I 8 80 1 8 8.0 I I I F F I I E 1.767.87 Ch such and Signing (4 sheets) I I 4.0 I I 1 16.0 1 16.0 I I I 1 1 1 1E 3535.73 Channehzation Detail (1 sheet) y y I I 1.0 I I 8 80 1 8 8.0 I I I 1.638.64 QC Review 1 1 4 4.0 1 1 160 I 160 I I I 1 160 I 1 1 {E 571714 M I I I I I I I I 1 1 90% Y Y I I I I I I I I 1 1$ Site Preparation (4 sheets) I I 1.0 I I 1 12.0 1 120 I I I F F 1 1 2.393.34 TESC Plans (4 sheets) 1 1 I I 1.0 I I 8 8.0 1 16.0 I I I F F. d d E 2,362 32 TESC Dated (1 sheet) Y Y I I 10 I I 4 4.0 8 8.0 I I I F F' d d 1.245781 Page 2 of 4 229 FEEESTIMATE CeyefTukwlle Tukwile Urban Comer. PedesbletyBlcycle Bridge CMI Englneerirlg(KPFF) Task SCOPEOFWORK Shale Foundations Concrete Columns Structural Earth Walls Steel Superstructure Deck Slab Hand Railings 9.04 East Approach Ramp Design Shaft Foundations Concrete Columns Structural Earth Walls Steel Superstructure Deck Slab Hantl Railings 9.05 Meeallaneous Structures Wayfinding Sign Supports and Foundations unlay Protection Structures Miscellaneous Retaining Walls Lighting Supports and Fountlations 9.06 kntldpated Struduml Plan Shama(Sheet Couch: t58) General Notes and Abbreviatigns General Plan and Elevation Horizontal Control Plan Construction Sequence (2 Sheets) Foundation Layout Pile Details West Abutment Plan and Elevations West Abutment Details East Abutment Plan and Elevations East Abutment Details Superstructure Layout Arch Plan antl Elevation Arch Sections (2 Sheets) Arch Details (3 Sheets) Arch Tension Ties Arch Tension Tle Details Dad Framing Plan and Elevation (2 Sheets) Oed Framing Plan Deck Sections (2 Sheets) Deck Details (2 Sheets) Arm Connection Details (3 Sheets) Deck Vertical Support Wyout(2 Sheets) Deck Vertical Support Sections (2 Sheets) Deck Vertical Support Detnis(2 Sheets) West Apo roach Plan and Elevation West Approach Foundation Plan and Fla such W est Approach Superstructure Sections W esl Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets) W est Approach Deck Sections West Approach Deck Details (2 Sheers) East Approach Plan and Elevation East Approach Foundation Plan antl Elevation East Approach Superstructure Sections East Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets) East Approach Deck Sections East Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets) Miscellaneous Slruc[ures(2 Sheets) 907 Dellverables 30% PS Submittal 30% PSE Plen Set Preliminary Estimated Quantaies and Costs 30% PSE QA/DC 60% PSE Submittal 60% PSE Plan Set Specification Outhns updated Quantities and Costs Responses to City 30% PSE Comments 60% PSE QA/QC 90%PSE Submittal 90 PSE Plan Set Draft Sperfication Updated Quantities and Costs Responses to City 60% PSE Comments 90% PSE QA/QC F1 a] PSE Submittal Final PSE Plan Set Final Specification Final Quantities and Costs Responses to Clty 90% PSE Comments Final PSE QA/QC 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 Reimbursablest Subtotal I Project Senior Project Desgn CAD TTechnician Atlmin Proj. Mulbpliei Principal Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer Coordinator 2 5846 S 65 DO I 50.00 I 50.00 I 4200 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I It 38,00 I I I I I I I 35,001 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 22.00 1800 Reimb. k 1_ I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I P P$ 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.0 I 0.0 I I 1 0.0 I 0.0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 pmre2 Amount I I 10.0 BridgeAasthebn Collabombon(LMN) 10.01 Bridge Structure I I I I I I I I P P$ Arch Geometry I I I I I I P$ Arm COior I I I I I I I P Connectons-Suso cables I I 1 I I I I P P$ Connections- Britlge Dack I I I I I I I 9E Connecions Abutments I I I I I I I E.. Connexions -Tied Arm I I I I I I F` I$ Connexions Lateral Support 1002 gpproam Real" I$ Column Treatments 1 I I I I I I I E I$ Superstructure Treatments I I I I I I I I 1 Ded Treatments t I I I I I I P I$ Eanh- 11Treatments 1 1 I I I I I E 1$ Handrail System I 1 I I I I 1$ 1003 Draft Besis of Design Document 1 I I I I I 1 1$ 10.04 30%Plan Set 1 I I I I I I I$ 10.05 3Q%PSE Debrief (whh dtY) I I I I I I I 1 1$ 2 30 Page 3 of FFEESTIMATE CldofTukwlla TukvAle Urban Carper, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Chill Englneedng(KPFF) P Project Senior P Protecttr E Prq A Multiplier I 1 Principal P Engineer C Coortlmet., C Admm M 2.5846 Task SCOPEOFWORK 65001 50.001 50001 4 42M 38.001 a 3 35.001 2 22001 S 18.00 R Reimb. C ComtaGAmoun[ 1006 Archgeablral Sheets /Dealgn I I I I I I I I I I I F F 1 1$ Coda Sheet I I I I I I I I I I F F I I$ Elevabons I I I I I I, I I I 1 1 l l$ Sections (2 sheets) I I I I I I I I I I I F F- 1 1 S Connection Details (2areal I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I k k= I Is Ligh6ngCOOrdlnatlon I I I I I I I I I I E E 1 11$ Approach Sections. East ApproachSecitons. West Handrail Details Study Model Development I I I I I I I I I I I C C 1 1$ 1 10,07 Flnel Basis of Design Document I 1008 60%Submittal 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I t t I I$$ 60 %Plan Set Outline Specs I I I I I I I I F F I I$ 1 6D% PSE Deb, af(with city) "it yCOmment Respo to 30% M M I I I I I I I I I I E E._.,:. I I$ 10.09 90%SubmlOal M M I I I I I I I I l l$ 90% Plan Set M M I I I I I I I I F F I I$ DraftSpecs M M I I I I I I I I I I F F l l a 90 %PSE Debrief (with city) I I I I I I I I I I$ City Comment Review /Response to 60% M M I I I I I I I I 1 1 10.10 100%Submroel M M I I I I I I I I G G.. 1 1$ 100"'m at I I$ Final Specs Y Y I I I I 1 1 I I I l l:- l l$ C City CommentReview /Response to 90% I I 1 r I I I I t t$ Reimbursablesl i 1 1 i i I I$ 1 1$ h I I SubiNai 0 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 1 0 0.0 1 0.0 1 1 S I I i.„m....�v.,a: ...,...t°I.1 ....ee,.,:. :..'I:,e :::::,a,®..ad irtin 'oei...:.... M M-:.,:'. ,...,....e.m.... I I I I Reimbursable.( j= t I SubtomiN 0.0 1 0.0 Total Hours 34.0 883.0 I I I 1 I I G 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 IE la 0.0 40.0 1 418.0 663.0 888.0 114.0 0.0 E 276.547.03 r E 278.647.03 Page 4 of 4 231 FEEESTIMATF CKyofTukydla Tukwila Urban Center, Pedeetrlan/Bloyde Bridge KPG Senior Project Designer CAD Survey Office I Multiplier UD /LA I Bury LA/Survey I Technician] Crew I Admin 2881745 Task (SCOPEOF WORK S 64.90 I 56.561 40.13 I 31.25 1 1 47.6 23.08 Reimb. I CorltraetAmoum 1.0 Protect Management and Administration_ 1.01 Project Schedule I I I I I I I$ 1.02 Design Team Supplemental Agreements I 1 I I I I 1' I$ 103 Progress Reports I I I I 1 I I$ 1.04 Invoices I I I 1 I I 1 1.05 Team Meetmgs (Assume 12 meetings 3 City Workshops) 1 450 I I I 45.0 I I 1:... 1 12,468.59 Consultant Meetings w/ City (Assume 12 meeting) I I I I I I 1 I$ Consultant Internal Meetings (Assume 12 meeting) 1 Reimbursabiesl i I I 1 S 250.001 250.00 I Subtotal) 45.0 4 0.0 1 0.0 I 45.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 250.001 12,718.59 20 D-1111 Criteria Docum rrt 2.01 Design Criteria D ft I 1 2.02 Design Criteria Final I I I I I 1 I S Reimbursableslr Subtotal o.o I o.0 1 0.o I O.o I 0.0 I 00 I s 1 30 Topofaphicend Boundary Sur w(KPG &KPFFCINB 301 Top ographc Mappng Phase l 1 1 40 1 60 1 500 1 90.0 1 1 1$ 18,209.52 3.02 Topographic Ma pp inA Phase 2 1 1 2.0 1 3.0 I 30.0 1 480 1 1 I$ 9,967.06 3.03 Survey Base Review I I I 1 I I 1:'.I' I$ Reimbursablesl I' i 1 t '1 3,500.001 3,500.00 Y I 1 I I 1 f P Subtotal) 0.0 1 6.0 1 9.0 1 80.0 1 136.0 1 0.0 1 S 3.500.00 1 31,676.581 4.0 Geoteehnleal Research and Recommendations 4.01 Field Explorations and Laboratory Testing 1 I 1 I I I I I$ 4.02 Geotechnical Evaluation, Reporting and Meetings I I 1 I I I 1 I$ 4.03 Review of Report and Comments I I 1 I I I I$ Relmbursablesl _..1 i 1'. 1 S 1 I I I I I I r 1 subtotal 0.0 i 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 j 0.0 1 I Bill 5.0 H1Mrautics 1KPFF ChIl) 501 Meet with Agencies I I I I I 1 1$ 502 Establ sh 300year Flootlplain 5.03 Establish Structural Clearance 1 I I I 1 t I I$ Reimbursablesl I I 1: 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 r I Subtota 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 1 a.- W 6.0 Environmental and Permitting Services (Landau KPFF CM6 601 Team, Agency, and Pre Application Meetings 6.02 SEPA Checklist 6.03 WSDOT Local Programs ECS 6.04 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment I I I I I I 1 1$ 6.05 Biological AssassmenVEFH I t I t I 1 I$ 6.06 Cultural Resources Investigation I I I 1 I I I I$ 6.07 Shoreline Permit I 1 I 1 I I':.::. I$ 6.08 Wetiand/WaterwayDelineation I I I I I I I$ 6.09 Critical Areas Report I I I I I I I I$ 6.10 Mitigation Construction Documents I I I I I I I ':1 6.11 IARPA 1 I I I I 1 1 1$ 6.12 Aquatic Lands Easement Reimbursablesl 1 :S' :[I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 subtotal I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 is 1 7.0 Project Work how 7.01 Internal Team PSE Kick-Off Meeting 1 40 t 1 4.0 1 1 1 1 1 1,210.68' 7.02 TSL Review Project Kick Off Meedng 1 4.0 1 1 4.0 I I I 1 1 1,210.68 7.03 Tied Arch Concept Workshop I 4.0 1 I 1 1 1 1.. I$ 748.10 Tied Arch Alternatives Graphics I I I I I I 1' I$ 7.04 West and East Approach Concept Workshop 1 4 0 1 I 4.0 1 1 1 1 I$ 1,210.68 West Approach 1 I I I I I 1 1 EastApproacn I I I I I I 1:.. I$ 7.05 Final Concept Selection Workshop I 4.0 I I 4.0 I I I I$ 1,210.68 Connection Detail Sketches 1 I I 1 1 I I 1$ Surface Finish Examples I I I 1 I I 1 CelorExamplea I I I 1 I I L I$ Stud Model Development I I I I I F- I$ Sketch Up Quality Renderings (6) I I 1 1 1 1 1 1$ 7.06 Public Outreach 1 I I I I I 1 1$ Graphics I I I I I I I 1$ Reimbursablesl 1 1::.. 1 I:._. 1 200.001 200.00, I I I I I I E 1 Subtotal] 20.0 1 0.0 1 16.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 S 200.001$ 5,790.82 8.0 CMI Enigneering 8.01 Concept Workshop and Preferred Alt Selection I I I I I I F I$ 8.02 Site Prop and Demolition I I I I I I :1 8,03 Horizontal and Vertical Layout I I I I I I I Route Layout 1 i 1 I I II'• I HorizontelControl 1 I I I I I 1..., 1$$ Ramp transitions I I I I I I 1 I Venical Alignment 1 I I I I I 1 1$ VehicularCrossingofTrail 1 I I I I I 1 1$ Rechannelization Baker St 1 I I I I 1 1' 1$ Riverview Plaza Driveway Reconstruction 8.04 Grading and Paving Terrain Model Typical Section Coord with KCFD and USACE 8.05 TESL 8,06 Surface Water 1 i$ 1 73 F, 1 1$ 1 I$ I 1$ f._ 1 E° 1 Page 1 of 4 232 FEEESTIMATE: C4ofTukwila Tukwila Urban Center, PedesbiaNBicycie Bridge Kp0 Senior Project Designer CAD Survey Office Multiplier De UD LA Sury Surve Technician Crew Admin 28131745 I I I I I Task SCOPEOFWORK 64.901 56.561 40.131 31.251 47.661 2309 Reimb. I Cor&.dAmourd Site Drainage M I I I I I I$ Infiltration 8.07 UUlides City and Private Relocations I I I I I I I$ Franchise utility Coordination 1 I I I I I I I$ SeatUe Public Utility Coordination I I I I I I 18 8.05 Ch. nnelization and Signing 1 I I I I I IS ParkingLotRevisions 1 I I I I I I IS Roadway Signing I I I I I I 1 I S Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Circulation Study I I I I I I 1 1$ Rechannelization Baker St I I I I I I I 1$ 8.09 CoetEetlmate I I I I I I I I 30% I I I I I I 1 1$ 60% I I I I I I 1 1$ 90% I I I I I I I I$ Final I I I I I I I 1$ 8.10 Specifications I I I I I I 1 1$ 60 Outline I I I I I I I 1 90% Special Provisions I I I I I 1 1 Final Special Provisions I I I I I I 8.11 Pleruheets I I I I I I '1 30% I I I I I I 1 I$ Site Preparation (4 sheets) I I I I I I I I$ TESC Plans (4 sheets) 1 I I I I I 1 I$ Roadway Sections (lshea0 Pian /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) Drainage (4 sheets) I 1 I I I 1 1$ Utility (3sheets) I I I I 1 I I 1$ Channelization and Signing (3 sheets) I I I I I I 1 1$ QC Review I I I I I I I I$ I I I I I I I$ '60% I I I I I I I I f Site Preparation (4 sheets) I I I I I I$ TESC Plans (4 sheets) I I I I I I 1$ TESC Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I I 1$ Roadway sections(1sheet) I I I I I I I I$ Plan /Profile Sheets sheets) I I I I I I I PavingDetail(lsheet) 1 I I I I I 1$ Drainage (4 sheets) 1 I I I I I 1 1$ Drainage Detail (1 sheet) 1 I I I I I I$ Utility (3 sheets) I 1 I I I 1 1$ Utility Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I I 1 1$ Channelization and Signing (4sheets) ChannelizaLOnDetail(1sheet) I If QC Review I I 1 I I I I 1$ I I$ 90% I I I I I I Site Preparation (4 sheets) I I I I I I TESC Plans (4 sheets) TESC Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I I I 1$ Roadway Sections() sheet) I I I I I I 1 I$ Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I 1 I I I I I I$ Paving Detail (1sheet) Dremage (3 sheets) I I I I I I I$ Drainage Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I 1 I$ Utihi (3 cheats) I I I 1 I I I$ Udliry Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I I 1$ Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) I I I I I I I$ Channelization Detail() sheet) I I I I I I 7 i I$ QC Review I I I I I I 1 1$ I I I I I I I I$ 100% I I I I I I 1 1$ Site Preparation (4 sheets) I I I I I I 1 1$ TESC Plans (4 sheets) I I I I I I 1 I$ TESC Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I I I I$ RoadwaySections(isheet) 1 I I I I I I 1$ Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) 1 I I I I I 1$ PavingDetail(lsheet) I I I I 1 I 11$ Drainage (4 sheets) I I I f I I 9$ Drainage Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I I 1 1$ Utility (3 sheets) 1 I I I I 1$ Utility Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I I$ Channelizatio n and Signing (4 sheets) I f I I I i$ Channelization Derail (1 sheet) I I I I I I 1$ QC Review I I I I I I I$ I I I I I I I I$ Final Bid Set I I I I I I 1$ Site Preparation (4 sheets) I I I I I I I$ TESC Plans (4 sheets) I I I I I I I$ TESC Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I I 1. 1$ RoadwaySections(Ssheet) I I I I I I 1 1$ Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I I I I I I 1 I$ Paving Detail (lahear) I I I I I I 1 I$ Orainage (4 sheets) 1 I I I I I 1 I$ Orainage Detail (I sheet) 1 I I I I I 1 I$ utifity(3snasts) I I I I I I 1 I$ Utiliry Detail (1 sheet) 1 I I I I I I I$ Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) 1 I I I I I 1 1$ Channelization Detail (1 sheet) 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I$ QC Raview 1 I I I I I 1$ Reimbursablesl �1. 1- i I i 1 I I Subtotal) I I I I I I 0.0 1 0.0 I O.O t O.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I S z a:= 9.0 Structural Entinsedng(KPFF) 9.01 Baels of Design I I I I I I I I$ 9.02 Bridge Design I I I 1 1 I I Y$ Deep Foundations I I I I I I I 1$ Page 2 of 4 233 FEEESTIMATE ClyaTularlle Tukella Urban Carder, PedestriarVElayyele Bridge KPO Senior Project I CAD Survey I Omce Multiplier UD LA Sury SuNe Technician Crew Admin I LA/ I I 2881745 3 Teak SCOPEOFWORK 64.901 56.561 40.131 31.251 47.661 23.08 Reimb. I Contract Amount West Abutment I I I I I I I 9$ East Abutment I I I I I I I I$ Arch Steel Pipe. I I I I I I 1 I$ Aroh Abutment Connections I I I I I I I Arch Tension Ties 1 I I I I 1 I Arch Miscellaneous Connections I I I I I 1 I$ Deck structure Framing 1 I I I I 1 I$ Deck Slab I I I I 1' I$ Deck Hand Railing J 1 J 1 I I I I 1 I$ Arch Suspension Hangers I I I I I I 1 I$ 9.03 WedApp.aeh Ramp Dei lgn I I I I I I I I$ Shaft Foundations I I I I I I 1 I$ concrete Columns I I I I I I I I$ Structural Earth Walls I I I I I I 1 I$ Steel Superstructure I I I I I I I I$ DeckSlab I I I I I I 1 I$ Hand Railings I I I I I I I I$ 9.04 East Approach Ramp Design I I I I I I I I f Shaft Foundations If Concrete Columns I I I I I I 1 I$ SVuctural Earth Walls Steel Superstructure I I I I I I I I$ DeckSlab I I I I I I I$ Hand Railings I I I I I I I I$ 9.05 MleceilleneousStructurea I I I I I I I I$ WayfindingSign Supports and Foundations 1 I I I I I I I$ Utility Protection Structures Miscellaneous Retaining Walls I I I I I I I$ LightingSupports and Foundations 1 I I I I I I I$ 9.06 Anticlpated Structural Plan Sheet. (Sheet Count 358) I I I I I I 1 General Notes and Abbreviations I I I I I I. I$ General Plan and Elevation I I I I I 1 I$ Horizontal Control Plan I I I 1 I 1 Construction Seouence (2 Sheets) I I I I I I I Foundation Layout I I I I I 1 I$ Pile Details I I I I I 1 I$ WestAbutmentPlan and Elevations I I I I I I 1 I$ WestAbuVnentDetails I I I I I I 1 I$ EastAbuVnent Plan and Elevations I I I I I 1 1 I$ East AbutmemDetaire I I I I I I 1 I$ Superstructure Layout I I I I I I 1 I$ Arch Plan and Elevation I I I I I I 1 I$ Arch Sections (2 Sheets) I 1 I I I I 1 I$ Arch Details (3 Sheets) I$ Arch Tension Tie. I I I I I I I I$ Arch Tension Tie Details I I I I I I I$ I Deck Fram in g Plan and Elevation (2 Sheets) I 1 I I I I 1 I$ I Deck Framing Plan I I I I I I I$ I Deck Sections (2 Sheets) I I I I I 1 I$ Deck Details (2 Sheets) I I I I I 1 I$ Arch Connection Detail. (3 Sheet.) I I I I I I I I$ Deck Vertical SupportLayout(2 Sheets) I I I I I I I$ DeckVerticalSupport Sections (2Sheets) Deck Vertical Support Details (2Sheets) West Approach Plan and Elevation I I I I I I I I$ I West Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation I I I I I I I I West Approach Superstructure Sections I I I I I I, 1 1$ I West Approach Superstructure Details l2 Sheets) I I I I I I 1 I$ I West Approach Deck Sections I I I 1 I 1 I$ West Approach Deck Do ile(2Sheets) I 1 I I 1 I$ East Approach Plan and Elevation I I I I I 1 I$ East Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation I I I I 1 I East Approach Superstructure Sections I I I I I I I$ EastApproachSup erstructureDetails(2Sheets) I I I I I I 1 I$ EastApproachDeckSections I I I 1 I 1 I$ East Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets) I I I i I 1 1$ Miscellaneous Structures (2Sheets) I I I I I I 1 I$ 9.07 Deliverables I I I I I I- I$ 30%PSESubmltrel I I I I I I I$ 30%PSE Plan Set I I I 1 I I 1$ Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Costs I I I I I I 30%PSEQA/QC I I I I I I 1 1$ I I I I I I 1 IS 60%PSESubmittal I I I I I I I I$ 60 %PSE Plan Set I I I I I 1 I$ Specification Outline I I I I I 1 1$ Updated Quantities and Costs I I I 1 I I I$ Responsesto City 30 %PSEComments I I I I 1 I$ I 60 %PSE QA/QC I I I I I 1 1$ I I I I I I I$ I 90%PSE Submittal I I I I I 1 I$ I 90 %PSE Plan see I I I I I I I$ Draft Specuicatlon I I I I I I I$ UpdatedQuantitiesandCosts I I I I I I I I$ Responses to City 60 %PSE Comments I I I I I I 1 I$ 90 %PSEQA/QC I I I I I I 1 1$ I I I I I I 1 I$ FInaIPSESubmittal I I I I I I 1 I$ Final PSE Plan Set Final Specific bon Final Quantities and Cost. 1 I I I I I I$ ResponsestoCRy90 %PSEComments 1 I I I I I 1- I$ Final PSE QA/QC I I I I I I L I$ Reimbursablesl I I I I I I 1 1 Subtotal) 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 is 10.0 Bridge'.. ....Collaboratlon(LMN) Page 3 of 4 234 FEEESTIMATE Chyof Tukwila Tukwlia Urban Center, Pedeetzlan/Blcyde Bridge KPG Senior Project Designer CAD Survey Office I Multiplier 0 UD /LA I Bury 11,Vsurvey l Technician) Crew Admit 2881745 H Task SCOPEOF WORK 64.901 56.561 40.131 31251 47.66 I 23.08 Reimb. I GentlestAmourd 1001 Bddge Structure I I 1 I I I 1 I$ Arch Geometry I I I I I 1 1$ Arch Color I I I I 1 I I I$ Connections Susp Cables Connections Bridge Deck 1 I I I I 1 1$ Connections Abutments I I 1 I i I 1 I$ Connections T ied Arch Connections Lateral Support 1002 Approach Ramps I I 1 I I I 1 I$ Column Treatments I I 1 I I I 1 I$ SuPerstructure Treatments I I I I I I i, 1$ Deck Treatments I I I I I I L I$ Earthwall Treatments I I I I I I I S Handrail System I I I I I I i 11$ 1003 Dreg Basle of Dealgn Document I I I I I I 1 I$ 1004 30% Plan Set I$ 10 05 30%PSE Debrief (with crM I I I I I I 1 1$ 10.06 Archltectural Sheers /Design I I I I I I I "1 Code Sheet I I I I I I l I$ Elevetlons I$ Sections 12 sheets) I I I I I I I 1$ Connection Details (2 sheets) I I I I I I I I$ Lighting Coordination 1 I I 1 I I I I$ Approach Sections, East I I I I I I I I$ Approach Secitona, West I I I I I I 1 1$ Hantlrail Details I I I I I I i I$ Study Model Development I I 1 I 1 I 1 'I 1007 Flnel Beals of Design Document I I I I I I 1 'I 3008 SO%Submihal Y I I I I I I 1$ 60 Plan set 1 I I I I I I$ OuUineSpecs 1 I I I I I I$ 60 %PSE Debrief (with city) 1 I I I I I I$ City Comment Review Response to 30% I I I I I 1 I$ 10.09 90%SubmlltaI I I I 1 I 1 1 I$ 90 %P Ian Set 1 I I I I I l I$ Draft Specs 1 I I I I I I 'l$ 90 %PSE Debrief (with city) 1 1 I 1 I I l I$ City Comment Review Response to 60% I I I 1 I I l I$ 10.10 100%Submitial I I I I I l I$ 100% Plan Set I I I I I l I$ Final Specs I I I I I I 1$ City Comment Review Response to 90% I Reimbursablesl 1 'f` >I 1 I I I I I I I I Subtotal: 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 I S 11.0 Urban Design and Way Finding 11.01 Illumination 1 40.0 I I 148.0 I 200.0 1 I l I$ 42,607.29 11.02 Wayfinding, Furnishings &Signal 1 16.0 I I 40.0 I 64.0 1$ 13,381.67 1103 Landscaping and Irrigation 1 30.0 I 1 96.0 I 124.0 1 I l 1$ 27,879.38 11.04 Walkway Selection/ Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies I 24.0 1 1 54.0 72.0 _1 1 17,217.33 Reimbursablesl 1 I 500001 500.00 1 1 Subtotal) 310.0 1 0.0 I 938.0 480.0 0.0 I 0.0 1 800.00 I 101.585.68 12.0 Twee. Size, aM Lncatlon Report ICOmplrnel i$ Relmbursables: i t 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 Subtotal) 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 I I I Tu �0 6 13.01 WSDOT Coordination WSDOT 1 6.0 I 20.0 I 20.0 I 20.0 I I 1 I 8,495.96 esign 1303 14.0 l 3 21.855.15 Signal ions atAndover Park E� &Beker 20 6A 1 16.0 I I I 1 aM„v, S 4,282.96 Reimbursablesl 1 1 1 1 I 1.000.0013 1,000.00 Subtotal: 22.0 I 68.0 I 112.0 I 72.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 S 1.000.00 I S 35.634.08 14.0 RIRV -Wa S.,A- 14.01 Legal Description I I 1.0 I 12.0 I I I 1 l$ 1,550.72 14.02 Right- of-Way Plan I 1 7.0 I 26.0 I 32.0 I 20.0 I 1 IS 9,776.32 14.03 Title Reports 1 1 8.0 1 36.0 1 12.0 I 26.0 1 I I 10,118.73 Reimbursablesl 1 1 1 1 I$ 2.000.001$ 2,000.00 Y N mg Subtotal) 0.0 1 16.0 I 74.0 I 44.0 1 46.0 1 0.0 1 S 2.000.00 I$ 23.44517 t 15.0 Conatru.11 .0PPRServiese Y I I I I I Y I1$ I I I I I I t IS Reimbursablesl I. 1 T 1 (S I 1 I I I I I 1 Y Subtotal) 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 I 1 j Tab d Hours 197.0 90.0 549.0 7010 184.0 0.0 S 7.450.00 I 210,851,5271 Page 4 of 4 235 FEEESTIMATE Cltyof Tukwlla Tukwila Urban Center, Pedeatrlan/Blgde Bridge 236 LMN Architects Partner Project I Project I Project I Intern Admin I Specs I QA/QC Multiplier Manager Designer Architect 3.1541 r I SCOPE OF WORK I I I I I I I I ComrectAmoum Task 72.84 39.42 44.23 34.86 23.56 1835 S 39.42 38.42 Rsirrb. s:.., :;,,:ere ^ea:«,- a::.:« ^:a:::.:a. .,...w.,...».,,» e.a..,.»,. a:- ....:a:ca::ar.::r:.aa .'..M..,.. 1;.. {..3e..,;:3:i ik; kik3iia aiSzi? ;;.I....?E5 »....»m. 2,202.11 Proje t TcR 2.0 d ine Supplemental greements 1.03 120 I 1 1 0 '••v I 1 I 1.04 Invoices 1 I 12.0 I I I I 12.0 I I 1 I 2,202.11 1.05 Team Meetings (Assume 12 meetings 3 City Workshops) 1 180 I 18.0 I 18.0 1 18.0 I 9.0 11,534.66 Consultant Meetings w/ Ciry (Assume 12 meeting) Consultant Internal Meetings (Assume 12 meetinP,) Reimbursablesl' I I I I I 1$ Subtotal: 20.0 I 50.0 I 18.0 I 18.0 I 9.0 I 25.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 1 Y 17 452.46 2.0 Design Criteria Document 201 Design Criteria Draft 1$ 2.02 Design Criteria Final M I I I I I I I 1$ Reimbursablesl I I I I 1 II 1 1. 1 I Subtotal M 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 1 I I »,.......M Ni,i 3.o Topofraphle and BourMa!v Survey (KPG 6KPFFCivin 3.01 Topographic Mapping Phase) I I I I I I I I I`i: 3.02 Topographic Mapping Phase 2 M I I I I i I I I$ 3.03 Survey Base Review I I 1 I I I$ ReimbursablesM J I I I 1. 7 E' 6 1 I I I I I I I I G 1 Subtotal M 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 4.0 Geotachnicel Research and Recomme idatioro 4.01 Field Explorations and Laboratory Testing I I I I I I I I I$ 4.02 Geotechnical Evaluation, Reporting and Meetings M 1 I I I I I I 1 1$ 4.03 Review of Report and Comments I I 1 I 1 1 I 1$ ReimbursablesM I I I I r I 1 I$ I$ I Subtotal y 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I I 5.0 Hydroulics(KPFF Civil 5.01 Meet with Agencies M 1 I I I I I I 1$ 5.02 Establish 100 -year Floodplain I I I I I I I I 1 I$ 5.03 Establish Structural Clearance M 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 :I Reimbursablesk. t I I 1 I I I J$ I$ 1 Subtotal) 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 S 1 t.:...:....- 's °:^u•IUrc2.f E`:,;..._ >:::::w 6.0 Environmental and PermittingSenrim (Landau KPFF Civil) 6.01 Team, Agency, and Pre Application Meetings I I I I I I I I I$ 6.02 SEPA Checklist 6.03 ASCOT Local Programs ECS I I I I I I I I 1':::.... I$ 6.04 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment I I I I I I I I 1 1$ 6.05 BiologicalAssessment/EFH 1 I I I I I I I I$ 6.06 Cultural Resources Investigation I I I I I I I I 1 I$ 6.07 Shoreline Permit I I I I I I I I I.. I$ 6.08 Wedand /Waterway Delineation I I I I I I I I f- 6.09 Critical Areas Report 6.10 Mitigation Construction Documents I I I I 1 i 1 1:. I$ 6.11 DARPA I 1 I I 1 I 1... 1$ 6.12 Aquatic Lands Easement I I I i I Reimbursablesl I I I Subtotal) 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 I 1 7.0 Project: Workshop- 7.01 Internal Team PSE Kick -Off Meeting 1 4D 1 I 40 1 I 1 1 1 I I$ 1,477.28 7.02 TSL Review& Project Kick Off Meeting I 40 I I 40 1 I I I I I I$ 1,47728 7.03 Tied Arch Concept Workshop I 40 I I 40 1 I I 1 I I$ 1.47728 Tied Arch Alternatives Graphics I 2.0 I 2.0 I 8.0 I I 24.0 I I I II J 1$ 3608.35 7,04 West and East Approach Concept Workshop I 40 I I 4 0 I I I i I 1 1$ 147728 West Approach 1 2.0 I 2.0 I 8.0 1 1 8 0 1 1 1 t 1 2,419.15 East Approach 1 2.0 I 20 I 8.0 I 8.0 I I I S 2,419.15 7.05 Final Concept Selection Workshop 1 4.0 I I 4 0 1 I I I I 1 1,477.28 Connection Detail Sketches I 2.0 1 2.0 I 8.0 I I 160 I I I 1 1$ 3,013.75 Surface Finish Examples 2.0 I 1.0 I 40 I I 8.0 I I I 1.736.66 Color Examples I 20 I 1.0 I 4.0 I I 8.0 I I I 1 'I$ 1,736.66 Study Model Development I I I 10.0 I I 40.0 I I I I 4,368.31 Sketch Up Quality Renderings (6) I I I 8.0 I I 16.0 I I I 1 2,305.45 7.06 Public Outreach I 40 I I 4.0 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1,477.28 Graphics I 16.0 I 8.0 I 32.0 I I 40.0 I I I 1 12,109.51 Reimbursablesr': 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 2,500.00 1$ 2,500.00 Subtotal) 52.0 1 18.0 1 114.0 1 0.0 1 168.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 S 2.500.00 1 45,080.69 8.0 CKA1 EroneeIN 8.01 Concept Workshop and Preferred Alt Selection I I I 1 I I I I" 1 8.02 Site Prop and Demolition 8.03 Horizontal and vertical Layout Route Layout I I I I I I I Fs 1 Horizontal Control Ramp uansitions I I I I I I I I Ei Vertical Alignment Vehicular Crossing of Trail Rechannelization Baker St I Riverview Plaza Driveway Reconstruction 8.04 Grading and Paving I Terrain Model I I I I I I I F 1 Typical Section I I I I I I I I f Ccord with KCFD and USACE 8.05 TESL I I I I I I 1 I I 8.06 Surface Water I I I I I I I I 1 1 Page 1 of 4 FEEFSTMATE Cttyar Tukwila Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestriart/Blcycle Bridge WIN Archltecfi Teak SCOPE OF WORK TIR Site Drainage Infiltration 8.07 Utilities City and Private Relocations Franchise Utility Coordination Seattle Public Utility Coordination 8.08 Channelization and Signing F Parking Lot Revisions F Roadway Signing F Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Circulation Study F Rechannelization Baker St 8.09 Cost Estimate 30% 60% 90% Final 8.10 Specifications 60 %Outline 90% Special Provisions Final Special Provisions 8.11 Planaheete 30% Site Preparation (4 sheets) TESC Plans (4 sheets) Roadway Sections (1 sheet) Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) Drainage (4 sheets) Utility (3 sheets) Channelization and Signing (3 sheets) QC Review '60% Site Preparation (4 sheets) TESC Plans (4 sheets) TESC Detail (1 sheet) Roadway Sections (1 sheet) Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) Paving Detail (I sheet) Drainage (4 sheets) Drainage Detail (1 sheet) Utility (3 sheets) Utility Detail (1 sheet) Channelization and Signing(4 sheets) Channelization Detail (1 sheet) QC Review 90% Site Preparation (4 sheets) TESC Plans (4 sheets) TESC Detail (1 sheet) Roadway Sections (1 sheet) Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) Paving Detail (1 sheet) Drainage (3 sheets) Drainage Detail (1 sheet) Utility (3 sheets) Utility Detail (1 sheet) Channelization and Signing(4 sheets) Channelization Detail (1 sheet) QC Review 100% Site Preparation (4 sheets) TESC Plans (4 sheets) TESC Detail (I sheet) Roadway Sections (1 sheet) Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) Paving Detail (1 sheet) Drainage (4 sheets) Drainage Detail (1 sheet) Utility (3 sheets) Utility Detail (1 sheet) Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) Channelization Detail (1 sheet) QC Review Final Bid Set Site Preparation (4 sheets) TESC Plans (4 sheets) TESC Detail (I sheet) Roadway Sections (1 sheet) Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) Paving Detail (1 sheet) Drainage (4 sheets) Drainage Detail (i sheet) Utility (3 sheets) Utility Detail (I sheet) Channelization and Signing(4 sheets) Channelization Detail (1 sheet) QC Review 9.0 Structural Ertl 9.01 Basle of D"g 9.02 Bridge Deaign Partner 72.84 I M I I I I I I I r I I M I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I Reimbursables$ I Subtotal I 0.0 Project r I Project Project I Intern I Ad-in Mans Designer Architect 39.42 I 44.23 I 34.86 I 23.56 I 18.75 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I i I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 d 1 I I I I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 Specs I QA/QC Multiplier 3.154 39.42 I 38.42 Reimb, I 0.0 1 0.0 CorltractAmount I Page 2 of 4 237 FEEESTIMATE Cltyof Tukwila Tukwila Urban Center, PadesVlar /Bicycle Bridge 'LMN Architects Partner Project I Project Project Intern Admin Spea I QA/QC Multiplier Manager Designer Architect 3 .1b4f h I I I I I C ntractAmurt Teak SCOPE OF WORK 7284 I 3942 I 44.23 I 34.86 23.56 18.75 39.42 3842 Reimb. I I I Deep Foundations West Abutment M I I I I I East Abutment M I I I I I I I 1$ I I I I I I I I I$ Arch Steel Pipes M I I I I I I I$ Arch Abutment Connections Y I I I I I I I 1$ Arch Tension Ties ArchMiscellaneousConnections I I I I I I I I I I I$ Deck Superstructure Framing I I I I I I I I DeckSlab Deck Hand Railing I I I I I I I I 1 ArchSuspensionHangers 1 I I I I I I I I I$ 903 West Approach Romp Design I I I I I I I I 1 Shaft Foundations I I I I I I I I 1 I$ Concrete Columns 1 I I I I I I I I I$ Structural Earth Walls M I 1 I I I I I I Steel Superstructure M I I I I I I I 1 I$ Deck Slab M I I 1 I I I I 1 1$ Hand Railings M I I I I I I I 1 1$ 904 Eeat Approach Ramp Design M I I I I I I I I Shaft Foundations M I I I I I I F Concrete Columns M I I I I I I I I Structural Earth Walls M I I 1 I I I I$ Steel Superstructure M I I I I I I I 1$ Deck Slab M I I I I I 1 I 1 1$ Hand Railings N I I I I I I I -.1 905 Mlecelleneouastrueturea M I I I I I I I 1$ WayfindingSignSupportsandFoundations I I I I I I I 1$ utility Protection Structures M I I I I I I I I$ Miscellaneous Retaining Walls N I I I I I I I 1$ Lighting Supports and Foundations 1 I I I I I I 1 I$ 9,06 Anticipated Structural Plan Sheets (Sheet Count t58) I I I I I I I I 1$ General Notes and Abbreviations 1 I I I I I I I General Plan and Elevation 1 1 I I I I I I I Horizontal Control Plan 1 I I I I I I I 1$ Construction Sequence (2 Sheets) I I I I I I I I 1 1$ Foundation Layout 1 I I I I I I I 1 I$ Pile Details 1 I I I I I I I 1$ West Abutment Plan and Elevations 1 1 I I I I I I WestAbutmentDetails 1 I I I I I I I 1 1$ East Abutment Plan and Elevations 1 I I I I I I I East Abutment Details M I I I I I I I I '1 Superstructure Layout 1 I I I I I I I I 1$ Arch Plan and Elevation 1 I I I I I I I I 1$ Arch Sections (2 Sheets) 1 I I I I I I I I$ Arch Details (3Sheets) 1 1 I I I I I I I$ Arch Tension Ties M 1 I I I I I I I 1$ Arch Tension Tie Details M I I I I I I I I 1$ Deck Framing Plan and Elevation (2 Sheets) M I I I I I I I Deck Framing Plan Deck Sections (2 Sheets) M I I I I I I I I I$ Deck Details (2 Sheets) I I I I I I I I$ Arch Connection Details (3 Sheets) M I I I I I I I Deck Vertical Support Layout (2 Sheets) M I I I I I I I Deck Vertical Support Sections (2 Sheets) M I I I I I I I I 1$ Deck Vertical Support Details (2 Sheets) M I 1 I I I I I 1$ West Approach Plan and Elevation M I I I I I I I I$ West Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation M I I I I I I I 1 '1 West Approach Superstructure Sections M I I I I I I I I I$ West Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets) I I I I I I I I. West Approach Deck Sections M I I I I I I I I I$ West Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets) I I I I I I I 1 1$ East Approach Plan and Elevation I I I I I I I, 1 1$ Eaat Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1$ East Approach Superstructure Sections M I I I I I I I 1 s1 East Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets) I I I I I I I I$ East Approach Deck Sections I I I I I I I I 1$ East Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets) M I I I I I I I I 1$ Miscellaneous Structures (2 Sheets) M I I I I I I I 1 1$ 9.07 Dellverablas I I I I I I I I 1 1$ 30% PSE Submittal I I I I I I I 1 i$ 30% PSE Plan Set I I I I I I I I 1$ Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Costs 1 I I I I I I I$ 30% PSE QA/QC 1 1 I I I I I I I 1$ Y I I I I I I I I 1$ 60% PSE SubmKal 1 I I I I I I I F I$ 60% PSE Plan Set I I I I I I I I I 1$ Specification Outline 1 I I I I I I I 1 1$ UPdated Quantities and Costs 1 I I I I I I I 1$ Responses to City 30% PSE Comments 1 I I I I I I I 13 60% PSE QA/QC I I I I I I I 1 =11$ I I I I I I 1 9$ 90% PSE Submittal 1 I I I I 1 I I I I$ 90% PSE Plan Set 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1$ 1 Draft Specification M I I I I I I I 1 1$ I Updated Quantities and Costs I I I I I I I I 1 1$ I Responses to City 60% PSE Comments 1 I I i I I I I i 1$ I 90 PSE QA/QC 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 1$ 1 I I I I I I I 1 1$ Final PSE Submittal I I I I I I I I 1 1$ Final PSE Plan Set 1 I I I I I I I 1 Final Specification M I I I I I I I 1 I$ Final Quantities and Costs Responses to City 90% PSE Comments M I I I I I I I 1 1$ Final PSE QA/QC I I I 1 I I I I I 1$ Reimbursablesl I I i I I I$ I$ Y I I I I I I I Subtotal( 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 I I Page 3 of 4 238 FEE ESTIMATE City of Tukwila Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrlan/Bluyce Bridge LMN Architects Partner Project I Project Project I Intern I Admin I Specs I QA /QC Multiplier I I Manager Designer Architect 3.1b47 1 I I I I I I DarnraCt Anloum Task SCOPE OF WORK 72.84 I $39.42 I 44.23 I 34.86 23.56 18.75 39.42 $38.42 Reimb. 10.0 Bridge Aesthetics Collaboration(I.MN) 10.01 Bridge Structure I I I I I I I I 1 I$ Arch Geometry 1 14.0 I 16.0 I 80.0 I I 40.0 I I I I$ 19,342.35 Arch Color I 2.0 I 1.0 I 2.0 I I 20 I I I I I$ 1,011.65 Connections Susp Cables 1 2.0 I 1.0 I 2.0 I I 2.0 I I I I 1 1 1 Connections Bridge Deck l 2.0 I 1.0 1 2.0 1 I 2.0 I I I 1 IS 1,011.65 Connections Abutments h 2.0 I 1.0 I 2.0 I I 2.0 I I I 1 i f 1,011.65 Connections Tied Arch 1 2.0 I 1.0 1 2.0 I 1 2.0 I I I 1 I f 1,011.65 Connections Lateral Support h 2.0 I 1.0 I 2.0 I I 2.0 I I I 1: l 5 11011.65 10.02 Approach Ramps M I 1 I I I I I 1 1$ ColumnTreatments 2.0 I 1.0 I 2.0 I I 20 I I I 1 I Y 1,011.65 Superstructure Treatments 2.0 I 1.0 I 2.0 I I 2.0 I I I I 1$ 1,011.65 Deck Treatments 1 2.0 I 1.0 I 2.0 I I 2.0 1 I I 1$ 1,011.65 Earthwall Treatments 1 2.0 I 1.0 1 2.0 I I 2.0 1 I I I 1$ 1,011.65 Handrail System i 2.0 1 2.0 I 2.0 1$ 1,136.01 10.03 Draft Basis of Design Document 1 I I 10.04 30%Plan Set 1 I 10.0 1 6.0 1 1 16.0 1 I I 10.0 I 1$ 4,482.01 10.05 3O%PSEDebrid(withcp0 1 2.0 I 4.0 I 4.0 I I I I I I I$ 1,515.14 10.06 ArchReetural Sheets /Deelgr 1 I I I I I I I 1 I$ Code Sheet 1 1 6.0 I 1 10.0 1 6.0 I I 1 I 1$ 2.291.83 Elevations 1 10.0 1 100 1 16.0 1 6.0 I I 1 1 I$ 4,844.42 Sections (2 sheets) 1 I 10.0 1 16,0 1 26.0 1 10.0 1 I I I$ 7 078.64 Connection Details (2 sheets) I I 100 1 16.0 1 26.0 1 10.0 1 I I I 1$ 7,07864 I ing Coordination I 6.0 1 6.0 1 10.0 1 6.0 1 1 I I I$ 3,129.02 Approach Sections, East I I 8.0 1 8.0 I 20.0 1 10.0 I 1 I I I$ 5,053.83 Approach Secitons'West I I 8.0 1 8.0 I 20.0 1 10.0 I 1 I I I$ 5,053.83 Handrail Details 1 1 8.0 1 10.0 I 200 1 10.0 I 1 I I I$ 5,332.89 Study Model Development 1 1 1 10.0 I 20.0 1 40.0 I 1 I 1$ 6,567.77 10.07 Final Basle of Design Document 10.08 SOXSubmktal 60% Plan Set 1 16.0 I 10.0 1 I 100 1 200 1 1 I 160 I'. 9,445.68 Outline Specs 1 100 1 4.0 I 100 1 1 1 260 1 8.0 1: 1 7,10438 60% PSE Debrief (with city) 2.0 I 4.0 I 4.0 I 4.0 1 I I I E I 1,955.03 City Comment Review/ Response to 30% h 4.0 I 20.0 1 4.0 1 I 100 1 I I 1 I$ 4,707.70 10.09 BO %Submittal M I I I I I I I i 1$ 90 %Plan Set 10.0 1 50.0 1 26.0 80.0 1 500 1 I 1 10.0 1 1 25,869.74 Draft Specs I 10.0 1 4.0 I 200 1 I I 26.0 1 8.0 l$ 8,204.11 9C %PSE Debrief (With city) 20 I 40 1 I 4.0 1 1 I 1 I 1$ 1,396.90 City Comment Review/ Response to 60% 2.0 I 10.0 1 10.0 I 16.0 1 I 80 1 1 I I 5,331.25 10.10 100%Submmal M I I I I I I I 1 I$ 100% Plan Set 8.0 I 16.0 1 16.0 1 24.0 1 24.0 1 1 1 I:' 1 10,483.70 Final Specs 1 I 4.0 1 8.0 1 1 1 16.0 1 1$ 3,366.95 City Comment Review Response to 90% 2 0 8.0 1 8.0 I 16.0 j 1 4.0 1 1 I _1 4,566.87 Reimbursablesl t I 1 t I 1 1 1$ 2,50000 1$ 2,50000 1 1 I I I 1 I I Subtotal y 84.0 1 254.0 1 272.0 I 360.0 1 290.0 I 12.0 68.0 I 52.0 1 2,500.00 1 167,955.18 11.0 Urban Design and Way Finding 11.01 Illumination I I I I I I I I I$ 11.02 Wavfinding, Furnishings Signal I I I I I I I I I 1$ 11.03 Landscaping and irrigation 1 I I I I I 1 1$ 11.04 Walkway Selection/ Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies I I 1 I I E 1 Reimbursablesl T I 1 t' F .I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I Subtotal) 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 I 12.0 Types. Size. and Location Report (Complete) I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I Y I Reimbursablesl Ill i 1 t: 1 i i i$ I$ I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 Subtotal 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 1 13.0 Slf.rel Design 1301 WSDOTC dination A I I I I I I 1$ 13.02 Pedestrian Signal Across West Valley Highway Design I I I I I I 1 I 13.03 Signal Modifications at Andover Park E Baker Blvd. I I I I I 1 1 1 Reimbursablesl r 1 l I I I I$ I$ M Subtotal 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 O.0 I 14.0 RlgitbFWeyServicas 1401 Legal Description l I I I I I I I 1 I$ 14.02 Riga -of -Way Plan 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1$ 14.03 Title Reports 1 I I_ I I I I F 1$ Reimbursables I 1 1 i I 1I I I I I I I I I 1 1 Subtotal 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 I 1 15.0 Construction Support Services I I I I I I I 1 1 1$ Reimbursablesl 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 Subtotal) 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 I 1 1 j Total Hours 156.0 322.0 404,0 378.0 467.0 370 68.0 520 6,000.00 1 230,488.33 Page 4 of 4 239 FEEFSTIMATE ClyofTUkwlle Tukwila Urban Center, Pedeetalan/Bluyele Bridge landau Aa4oelatea Senior Staff S('A0r SStpa! I_D/hlSl iPrincipall IASSOCia[el Senior I POf- I Protect I Staff I I /rc! Coots I 3�58]r Task I Sl701E.1 -11N 5 6500 1 E S6.00 I S 4] OO I E 40 00 I 3600 3200 1 E 3000 1 5 2500 1 E 31.W 2400 1 5 2900 1 5 1700 1 R b I Coma tit 1.0 Prolate Manegementend Admalatraden 101 Project Schedule 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I$ 102 Design Team Supplemental Agreements I I I I I I 1 1 I I I$ 103 Progress Reports 104 Invoices 105 Team Meetings (Assume 12 meetings 3 City Workshops) Consultatit Meetings w Crty(Aesume 12 meetings conaUhantlnternalMeetings (Assume 12meetng) Reimbursabiesl 1 1 1 1 S I E 1 I I I I I Subtotal1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 I r I 0.0 I 0.0 is I 2.0 Design "ntede Dacu ant 201 Des gn Crits, a Draft 1 I I I I I I I I I S 2.02 Design Criteria Final I I I I I I I I$ Reimbursables@ i 1 t 1 k I i f I S IS 1 I I I I I I I I I I P 1 Subtotal 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 I S :,w,ul�vn�nmwwu v� ,,.s..,:M:' d'., >m,m a, ;.o 3.0 Topoqraphk end Bounderi.u- (KPD &KPFFCMB 3.01 Topographic Mapping Phase 1 I I I I I I I S I 3.02 Topographic Mapping Phase 2 1 I I I I I I I I I P I S 1 303 5urvey Base Review I I I I I I I I I I Reimbursables$ I I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 Subtotal: 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 is t7mssmaa lFxras�rxamsir,'al� vwlaxsi�arci �ase� Jsaxi u,�rxanaw rsysu^.rl RMvii ania�ixEaaa x €I lia ilnaaau all rnewltiis lirminnn xu ia,�a i ass is v amine I l> ar 40 QeoteMnioal Reseereh and Recommended 4.01 Field Explore [ions and Laboratory Testing I I I I 40 I I 1 44.0 I I 20 I K 513.956.001E 4,242831 4.02 Geotechm,,a Evaluation, Reporting and Meetings I 80 1 1 I 1 640 I I I I 1 2.0 1 60 1 4.0 k $2000015 10,147.59 4.03 Rewewof Reportand Comment I I I I I I I I I I k I$ Reimbursables: F 1 I I i• 1 1 14.156.001 14,15600 I I Subtotal: 8.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 I 68.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 44.0 1 0.0 1 2.0 l 8.0 I 4.0 IS 14.158.00 1$ 28,546 42 se 4 1 5.0 Hydraulim(KPFF CIMR 501 Meetwth Agances 1 I I I I I I I 1 5.02 Estbl sh 100year Floodplan 503 Es[abl sh SGUCturel Clearance 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I Reimbursables@' E Suletnell 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I, 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 I$ I$ "0 E arts Pomalaing Serdoe. (landau& 1<PFF.0 601 Team. Agency. and Pre- Application Meetings 1 I I 6.0 1 1400 I I I I I I I I I $49015 19.1676]" 602 SEPA ChecklistI I I 20 1 110 I I I 80 1 I I 40 I 10 1$1 2,95564 603 WSDOT LO.. I Programs E. I I I 3.0 I 140 I I I 80 I 1 I I 50 10 1 1$ 3.594.35 604 Phase: Environmental Slte Assessment 1 I 10.0 I I I I I 1 540 1 40 I 1 150 I 70 $3.72215 8.433.52 605 Biological A...ssment/EFH I I I 6.0 1 400 I 1 360 I I 1 1 5.0 1 120 I 10 52401 11,467.37 606 Cultural Re sources l egation I I I I 80 I 1 I I 1 1 I 40 1 1 $6,63915 1420.79 607 Shoreline Permit 1 I I 3.0 I 360 I I I I 40 I I 16.0 I 40 51351E 289 ]ll 608 We rd/W,t -a, Delineation I I I 2.0 1 260 I 34.0 I I 1 10.0 I 1 10.0 I 1.0 $801 S 9.25145 609 Cnbcal Areas Report 1 I I 60 I 30.0 1 1 26.0 1 1 I 240 I I 10.0 1 10 I 5201E 10,965.53 6.10 Mitigation C,P -ction Document 1 40 1 1 360 1 29.0 I I I I 1 36.0 1 I 30 I II Is 14,061.291 611 IARPA 1 I I 10 1 8.0 1 I 80 1 1 1 I I 30 I 1.0 $501 2369.07 612 An uatc Lands Easement 1 I I 2.0 80 I I I 1 I 1 2.0 I 1.0 1: $501E 1.593.501 Reimbursables$ 1 1 i I'' I 1 I J 11 t _...._I 11476001 11.476.00 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 8 I Subtotal l 4.0 I 10.0 I 87.0 I 350.0 I 0.0 I .0 I 16.0 1 54.0 I 76.0 I 5.0 I 84.0 1 18.0 I 11476.00 1 104045.89 7.0 Protect Iselin., 701 Internal Team PSE Kick -0! /Meeting I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 6 1 S 702 TSL Review &Project Nick -0ff Meeting 703 Tied Arch Concept Workshop I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1$ Tied Arch Alternatives Graphics 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 IE 704 West and East Approach Concept Workshop 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I i IE West Approach 1 I I I I I I I I I 1$ East Approach 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I$ 705 Final Concept Selection Worwhoo I I I I I I I I I I 1 i 1$ Connacbon Detail sketches 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I IE SUnaca Finish Examples 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1$ Color Examples I I I I I I I I I I 1 1$ Study Model Development I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1$ Sketch Up Quality Renderings (6) 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 E 706 Public Outreach Graphics Reimbursables$' I 1 I I 1 I C Subtotal: 00 I 00 1 00 I 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 I 00 I 00 I 00 1 00 is IS u:r4 8.0 CMI Er�n eed n& 801 Dan cey[Workehopand Preterled Ah Selection I I I I I I I 1 1$ 802 Sib Prep and Demolition I I I I I 1 I I I 11$ 803 Horizontal and Verds" layout I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I S Route Layout Horiz 1 Ccnhol I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1$ Ramp vansmona I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I$ Vertical Alignmen of Trail VehicUlaraassg I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I Rechannelization Baker St I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1$ Rivervlew Plaza Driveway Reconstrucbon I$ 8.04 aneding and Paving I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I$ Terrain Model I I I I I I I I I I I I I Typical Seobon Coord wen KCFD and USACE 805 TES" 806 Surface Water Sus Drainage InfilVdtian 807 11b1idea Cgy and Private Relocations Franchise Utiliry Coordination Beetle Public utility Coordination 808 Glenlizationand Signing Parking Lot Revisions Roadway Signing Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Circulation Study Rechannelization Baker St IE IS 1$ IE IE IE IE IS IE IS 1$ IE IS IE I$ i$ 2 4 0 Page i of 4 FEEESTIMATE Chyof Tukwila Tukwila Men Center. Pedeetr in Bridge landau Aeaxlete. I Senior Stag Senior S p rt er I Principal) c I Associate Ilusocia[el Senior I Project I Project I Staffr I I C D S[aff l Tech Good 3.2581 1 Task SCOPE OF YARN I 65 DD 15 5 (E 4700 I E 40.00 I 36,00 3200 1 E 3000 1 E 25 DO I E 31 DO I E 2400 1 E 29.00 I E 1700 P—le C hbwcd Amount I I I I I I I I 1 E 809 coat EeBmaee I 60% 1 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 E so% Final I I I I I I I I I I I E B .ID SPaciff -di as 60%Outine I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 4 s I 90 Special Provisions Final Special Provisions 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I IE I 811 Planeheeb 30% Site Preparabon (4 sheets) I I I I I I I I 1 I E TESL Plans (4 sheets) Roadway Sectons(I Sheet) I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 7E Plan/Profile Sheets (3 sheets) Drainage (4 sheets) uti(ity(3sneetc) channefzaton and Signing (3 sheets) I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1E I QC Review I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 E I 1 I I I I I I I I I {e I Site Preparation (4 sheets) I I I I I I I I I I I E I TESC Plans (4 sheets) TESC Detail (1 sheet) 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 S Roadway Sections (I sheet) Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) Paving Detall (1 sheet) I I I I I I I I 1 I I N E Drainage (4 sheets) Drainage Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I I I I I I I I N 1 E Uulity(3 sneers) I I I I I I I I i I I I I iE uUliry Detail (1 sheet) 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 E cnanneNZaton and Signing (4 sheets) Channelization Demil (I heet) I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I N. E QC Review I I I I I I I I I I I I E I IE so% 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I E Site Preparation (4 sheets) I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 E I TESC Plans (4 sheets) I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 E I TESC Detail (1 sheets I I I I I I I I I I 1 E I Poadway Sens (1 sheet) Plan /Profle Sheets (3 sheets) Paving Decal (I Sheet) Drainage (3 sheets) I I I I I I I I 1 I E Drainage Detail (1 sheet) ubury(3 sheers) utliry Detail (1 sheet) enanneli :atom and Signing (a sheets) I 1 I I I I I I C 1E ChannelizaUOn Detail (lshect) I I I I I I I I I N IE QC Review I 100% Site Preparation (4 sheets) TESL Plans (4 sheets) I I I I I I I I I I I I C 1 E TESC Detail (1 sheet) RoadwaySec[ions Plan Prohle Sheets (3 sheets) Pavi ng Detail(' S heat) 1 I I I I I I I I' 'IE Drainage (4 sheets) DrainageDetail(ISheet) Utnry (3 sheets) I I I I I I I I I I I I N IE Utilityy Wil(I sheet) I I I I I I I I I I I p IE I Cl,t iizaton and Signing (4 sheets) I I I I I I I I I I N IE 1 Chi iization Detail (I sheet) I I I I I I I I I I I p 1 E 1 QC Review 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I' IE Finel Bid Set Site Preparabon (4 Tl S Plans (4 sheers) 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 E TESL Detail (1 sheet) I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I Roadway Sec (teheet) Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sneers) Pavmg Detail (I Sheet) I I I I I I I I I I 1 IE Drainage (4 sheets) 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 9 E Drainage Detail (I sheet) I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 E uti(iry(3sheets) I I I 1 I I I I I 1 iE Utility Detail (1 sheet) Channel- and Signing sheets) I I I I I I I I I I 1 I$ 1 channei�zabon Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I I I I I I I I i E I QC Review I I I 1 II I I I I I I I E Relmbursablesl �I 1 1 i I t I E. I E 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 f Sulmatai 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 is 1 E 9.0 Structural Enfneedng(KPFF) 901 Basleof —Ign I I I I I I I 1 IE 902 Biggs Deelgn I 1 I I I I I I i E Deep Foundations I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I E west Abutment I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1E East Abutment Arch Steel Pipes Arch Abutment Connections Arch Tension Ties Arch Miscellaneous Connections Deck Superstructure Framing Deck Slab Deck Hand Railing Arch Suspension Hangers 903 West Appmech Ramp Design Shaft FOUndat —e Concrete Columns Structural Earth Walls Steel Superstructure Deck Slab Hand Railings 904 EastAPPhwah Ramp Daelgn Shaft Foundatwns Concrete Columns Structural Earth Walls Steel Superstructure Deck Slab qE 1E IE jE IS IE IE IE �E 7S {S �E aE {E 1 E iE 1S 1E {E 1E IE Page 2 of 4 241 FEEESTIMATE Clyof TUkMle Tukwlle United Center. PedmtrleR/Blcycle Bridge Lentlau Aluocmtm senmr Senior Senor Senior Starr CAD /GIS Protect Support Multiplier Principal) IASSOCiatel Senior I Project Projett I Staff I I fAD Tech Coord. Staff Associate 3.258'! S Task SCOPE OF WVRN 65.00 S 5600 1 47W 1 $40,001 36W 32 00 I S 3000 25.00 1 S 3100 1 S 2400 1 29.00 1] DO Reimb. Co ec[AmouM Hand Railings 9,05 Mbmllaneeua S ruqurm Wayrinding Sign Supports end Foundations I I I I I IS I Utility Pro teaionstructures I I I I I I I I I I I f 1$ I Mlsceltaneous Retaining Walls 1 I I I I I I I I I Lighting Support and Foundations 9.06 MBcipeed Btruatu lPlen Sheets(Sheet COUnt358) t I I I I t I I I I I I I I I General Notes antl Abbreviations 1 I I I I 1 I I !1 Plan Elevation General and I I I 1' I Hoh—tal Control Plan Construction Sequence (2Sheers) I I I I 1 I t I I I I I I IS Foundation Larout 1 I I I I I I 1 I$ 1 I I I I I I I f S Pile Details west Abubnent Plan and Elavabons West AbuvnentDetails EmtAbutinent Plan and Elevations East Abutment Details Layout I I I I I I I I I I I I 1$ superstructure Arch Plan and Elevation ArchSections(2sneess) Details Sheets) Arch (3 AmhTendonTies I I I I I I I I I I I P Arch Tension Tie Details Deck Framing Plan and Elevation (2 Mesta) I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 f peck Framing Plan 1 I I I I I I I I I I p {E Deck Sac tian. (2 Shed.) 1 I I I I I I I F 1 E Deck Details (2 Sheets) Arch connect— Octal, (3 Sheets) I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I 6 I$ Deckvertical Support '-1'2 Sheets) 1 I I 1 I I f 1$ Deck vertical SupportSections (2 Sheers) 1 I I I I I I f I$ Cook Vertical Support Details (2She 1 I I I I I I I IE I West Approacn Plan and vation Ele West Approacn Foundaton Plan and Elevation 1 I 1 I I I I I I I f I$ West Ap proacn Superstructuresecbons 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1" IS I West Approacn Super structure Details (2 Sheets) West Approacn Deck Sect ions West Approach Deck Details (2 Sheers) East Approach Plan and Elevation 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I f I E East Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation 1 I I I I I I I I I I I f' I$ East Approach Superstructure Sections 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I$ East Approacn Superstructure Detahs(2Sneets) I I I I I I I I I I I I t 1$ East Asp Deck Sections I I I I I I I I 1 I I I f iE ,set Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets) 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I f Miscellaneous Structural (2 Shasta) 9.07 Dellverebim 30%PSESUbraftl 1 I I I I I I E I E 30% PSE Plan Set 1 I I I 1 I I I I I f I$ Prellminary Estimated Quantities and Costs I I I I I I I I I I$ 30s6 PSE QA/QC 1 1 I 1 I I I I I E- IS 609aPSESubmittal 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I S' I$ 6 PSE Plan Set 1 I I I I I I I I P I$ Specification outline 1 I I I I I E updated Quantities and Costs I I I I I I I E Responses to City 30% PSE Commenh 6o %PSE QA/QC I I I I I I I I I I I: I$ 1 I I I I I I I I I I I f I$ 9D%PSE Submittal 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I$ 90% PSE plan set 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I Draftspeaecation I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 A S Updated Quanbnea and Costs I I I I I I I I I I I 1 -IS Responses to City 60 PSE Comments 90%PSE QA/QC 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 15 1 Flnal PSE SUbmltlal 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 3$ 1 Final PSE Plan Set I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 It Final Specircaton I I I I I I I I I I 1 IS Final Quantities and DOSra 1 I I I 1 I I I I I IE Responses to Cary 90% PSE Comments Final PSE QA/QC t I I I I I I I I 1 I$ Reimbursablml Subtetal1 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 j 0.0 I 0.0 1I„a 1 M z" 10.0 Bdtlge Asemetlm Collabored- fl-MN) 10.01 Bridge St ucbae Arch GeometN I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1$ Arcn Color t I I I I I I I I I 1 '1 Connections -Susp Cables 1 I I I I I I I I f I$ Connections Bridge Deck Connect ions Abutments Connections -Tied Arcn Connections *LateralSupport 10.02 Anomech Reines Column Treatments SupersvucmreTreatmenss 1 I I I I I I F IS Deck Treatmenss t 1 I I I I I I I 1 7S Eartnwall Treavnents HandrailSystem 1 I I I I 1 I I I 1 15 10,03 DaiftBml -f Design Dsoummg 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 ^1 10.04 30%Pien set t I I 1 i 1 1 I I I F -1$ 10.05 30% PSE Debrief (wim all 10.06 hrrAtimcmrel Sheets /Design I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1?:. 1 Code She.[ 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I$ Elevations Sections (2 sheets) I I I 1 I I I I I 1 9$ Conneotion Details (2sheers) t I I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 +I$ Lighti at Coordination I I I I 1 I I I I 1,. 1$ I Approacn sections. East Approach Secitons, west 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 E Hantlrail Details t I I I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I$ Study Motlel Development 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 :1 10 07 Rnal Best of Death Doo —art 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 'I 10.06 80%But, Ittal 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 1 S I 60% Plan Set 1 I I I I I I I I f IS Ouuine Specs 1 I I I I I I I I I 1- 1 1 I S 6o% PSE Debner(with city) t I I I I I I I 1$ I City Comment Review /Response to 3o% 1009 909e Submtttsl I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I$ 90%PlanSet Draft Specs 90% PSE Debnet (wnh ciM {E 242 Page 3 of 4 FEEESTIMATE Cityof Tukwila Tukwila Urban Gender, Paeae tan/Baycls Brklge undau Aeaaahb4 Senior Senior Senior Stag /G6 Protect SCnDr SupPOrt I Multiplier Princi oa ICAD Associate Senior proles[ pro act SteH Coortl. I Associate Tech I I I I I I Staff I 1 3.258] j Teak I PEOFNORH 6500 1 E 56001 1147 M 4000 1 36001 $3200 1 3000 1 25.001 E 3100 I 24.00 E 2900) S 17.001 Reimb. I CgrNectAmoura City Comment Review Response to 60% 10.10 S0submleal 0% 1o0 Plan at 1$ Final Soecs 1 I I I I I I I I 4 1$ City Comment Review /Response to govt IE I$ I I I I I I I I I a 1 Subtatell 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 IS ..,...m::..'W ''..:.,9R°,.R 11.0 Urban Oeeign oral Way Floding 1101 Illumination 1102 Wayfmdina. Furnishings Signal 1103 Landssaping and Irrigation 11.04 Walkway Select ion /Parking LPt Trail Alignment Studies I I I I I I I I I I I AE Reimbursablesl 1 1 "4' I I 7 1 I I 1$ I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 subtntal: 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.o I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 j 0.0 I 0.0 I S MT 12.0 Twee. Sue. end Woadon Report (Complete) 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 IS I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1$ rs Reimbuableaf i _I 'i 1 3 t I 1 I 1 1 E I$ I I I� I I I I I I I I I Y I Subbtel1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 Is 1 13.0 Signal Deetgn 1301 WSDOT Coortlination 1302 Pedestrian Signet ACross West Valley Highway Design 1303 Signal Modifications at Andover Park E& Raker Blvd. I 1 I$ Reimbursablesr t 1 +t: I r 1 1 t 1 g T 1$ I I I I I I I I I I I k subtotal: 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 Is :l. G"!- luwaam °i': nmmuru eaarigiamm, +ilmaT:ai'rc liawaaxxa-l: la'r�nn I n aax�xtsxaaliadagaaall q..w64mn iRrza- �s; srcrrnsn l Q 14.0 RIRMCf- WeYSeMoea 14.01 Legal Desc"Po 14.02 R,5ht -of -Way Plan 14.03 Title Reports I I I I.... ..I Reimbursablesa ti I- 1 r I r r 1 1 1 I ..1E I S 1 Subtotal: 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 is ;laa.,.�44,,....,.,.. ,,,a^.a,,,.:..e,..,. Conabuetlon SUpponseMpee I I I I I I I I 1 I I 6 IS Relmbursablese ,_.""_,,,,,,,_,_7 I Subtotal: 0.0 j 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 is I Total Houm 120 10.0 67.0 350,0 68.0 104.0 18.0 98.0 78.0 7.0 920 220 25,6320D 1 132.592.31' Page 4 of 4 243 ME Transportation Committee Minutes November 21, 2011— Pape 2 Statewide Transportation Enhancement Program. This is Washington State Department of Transportation Grant in the amount of $500,000. The City applied for the grant in July 2010, and was awarded funding in 2011. No matching funds are required. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. D. Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge: Supplemental Agreement No. 9 with KPFF Staff is seeking Council approval for Supplemental Agreement No. 9 of Contract No. 07 -123 with KPFF Consulting Engineers in the amount of $1,367,580.11 to: Complete design and environmental permitting for the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Design of a new pedestrian signal across West Valley Highway Trail design connecting bridge users to the Tukwila Longacres Sounder Station Design along Baker Boulevard to add bike lanes and on- street parking KPFF conducted the Type, Size and Location (TSL) study and resulting report for the Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge. Funding for the Supplemental Agreement will come from the grants described in Item C above, including matching funds. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. E. Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Supplemental Agreement No. 13 with IBI Groun Staff is seeking Council approval for Supplemental Agreement No. 13 with the IBI Group for completion of the final design and PS &E documents for the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center in the amount of $429,000. Funding for this Supplemental Agreement will come from the TOD grant and the WSDOT Regional Mobility grant. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. F. Andover Park West Street Water Improvements Sunolement No. 14 with IBI Group Staff is seeking Council approval for Supplemental Agreement No. 14 with the IBI Group for completion of the final design and PS &E documents for the Andover Park West widening and water main replacement in the amount of $313,037 (widening $167,693 water main $145,344). Funding for this Supplemental Agreement will come from mitigation and traffic impact fees. The City was recently awarded $1,420.000 in grant funds for construction from the State Transportation Improvement Board. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. G. Ordinance: Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Staff is seeking Council approval to acquire property /condemnation authority as required for right -of -way and easements need for the Tukwila Urban Transit Center Project as follows: One right -of -way dedication Three temporary construction easements One permanent easement It is standard for City staff to request condemnation authority at the beginning of a property acquisition process for public projects. Although it is highly unlikely that any parcel of land within this area will require condemnation, establishing the ordinance prepares the City for condemnation proceedings, if required. Four parcels with three separate owners are included in the project area. The agenda packet provides specific details on ownership. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. 245 246 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS CAS NUMBER: Initials Meeting Date Prepared by /1 ,Eryor's review 11/28/11 1 BG4�1M 12/05/11 BG ITEM INFORMATION STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON Council review ITEM NO. 4.H. IORIGINALAGEN.DA DATE: 11/28/11 AGI -NDA ITEM TITLE Resolution updating the Public Works Fee Schedule for the 2012 Water, Sewer, and Surface Water Rates CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance BidAward Public Hearing ❑Other Alt g Date 11/28/11 Mtg Date Mtg Date 12/05/11 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date t14tg Date (SPONSOR Council Mayor .HR DCD .Finance .Fire IT P &R Police PW SPONSOR'S The City's water, sewer, and surface water rates need to be increased to meet operational SUMMARY and capital expenditures for their corresponding enterprise funds. The single and multi- family minimum water meter charge will increase from $10.00 to $12.00. The sewer fund's monthly residential flat rate will increase from $16.06 to $19.26. King County will not be increasing their sewer fees in 2012, which are currently $36.10 per month. The surface water fees will increase from $93.00 to $102.00 for residential parcels. RF,VIE;WED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 11/15/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: DE'SEAN QUINN RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Public Works COMMITTEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole. COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fund Source: WATER, SEWER, AND SURFACE WATER FUNDS Conments: MTG. DATE 11/28/11 12/05/11 MTG. DATE 11/28/11 12/05/11 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION ATTACHMENTS Informational Memorandum dated 11/10/11 Exhibit A Rate Matrix Exhibit B King County Ordinance No. 17102 Exhibit C Comparison of Rates with adjoining cities Draft Resolution Public Works Fee Schedule Minutes from the Utilities Committee meetings of 11/15/11 247 x City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM To: Mayor Haggerton UTILITIES COMMITTEE From: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director. Date: November 10, 2011 Subject: Water. Sewer. and Surface Water Rates for 2012 ISSUE Adopt 2012 water, sewer, and surface water rate increases. WATER Public Works has analyzed the needs of the water enterprise fund. Cascade Water Alliance's (CWA) wholesale water rates are projected to increase 9.2% for 2012. A rate increase on the minimum water meter charge (see Table 1) is being proposed to maintain the current level of service and lessen the impact of future increases for purchased water. A portion of this increase will provide the funds necessary for continuing operational and capital needs. Exhibit A is an overview of all of the proposed utility rate increases for residential customers. Exhibit C -1 shows a comparison of adjoining cities and their water rates. Exhibit D is the Resolution which updates the Public Works Fee Schedule. SEWER King County Ordinance No. 17102 has no sewer rate increase listed for King County sewage disposal fees in 2012 and the rate will remain $36.10 per residential customer equivalent per month. The King County sewage treatment capacity charge (for any new sewer connections) will increase from the current $50.45 to $51.95 per month for fifteen years for any sewer connection occurring between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012. Exhibit B is King County Ordinance No. 17102. Tukwila's sewer base rate is scheduled for an increase (see Table 2) in accordance with the rate model which analyzes the City's operational and capital needs. The City's sewer rate will increase from $16.06 to $19.26 per residential connection and from $28.12 to $33.74 for up to 750 cubic feet or fraction thereof for commercial /industrial customers. Exhibit C -1 shows a comparison of adjoining cities and their sewer rates. SURFACE WATER Tukwila's surface water base rate is scheduled for an increase in 2012. The City's surface water rate will increase from $93.00 to $102.00 per residential parcel, per year and will range from $12.31 to $102.90 per 4,356 square foot for all other parcels. Exhibit C -2 shows a comparison with other cities and their surface water rates. 249 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 TABLE 1 WATER RATES PROPOSED FOR 2012 Current 2011 CATEGORY Minimum Meter Proposed for C 20 12 Sing Fa 10. 00 12.0 0 Multi Family (ea co ndo, p a t o dwelling uni $1 $1 Commercial /Industrial I 30.0 0 $48 $40. $57 5.00 TABLE 2 SEWER RATES PROPOSED FOR 2012 CATEGOR Curren 20 11 Rates P rop ose d for 2 012 Residential Sewer Service Flat rate of $16.06 Flat rate of $19.26 (single dwelling unit) per month per month Residential Sewer Service Flat rate of $16.06 per Flat rate of $19.26 per (multiple dwelling u nit, p erman ent type) m for each d wellin g u nit month for eac dwelli unit Commercial /Industrial Sewer Service Flat rate of $28.12 per month and, any usage over 750 cubic feet of water per month shall be at the rate of $28.12 per 750 cf Flat rate of $33.74 per month and, any usage over 750 cubic feet of water per month shall be at the rate of $33.74 per 750 cf RECOMMENDATION The Council is being asked to adopt the City's 2012 water, sewer, and surface water proposed rate increases in accordance with the Public Works Fee Schedule Resolution and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole Meeting and subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular Meeting. Attachments: Exhibit A Rate Matrix Exhibit B King County Ordinance No. 17102 for 2012 Exhibit C -1 C -2 Comparison of Rates with Adjoining Cities Exhibit D Public Works Fee Schedule Resolution W:\PWEng\OTHER\Gail Labanara \Water Sewer Documents \Info Memo Water Sewer SWM Rates 11 -10 -11 docx 250 EXHIBIT A 10 N In t0 O o r m O Cl) v 'o o m o r n o 'ti m v (o V> C9 m N m N o N L O O Cl) o O o v C9 N co to O m N N c� m v M m 69 m v> m V N f` 0+ 6 m r o m N 4> f9 v n N m o N h O m N r Cl) m N_ H M l`7 N iR N N m (O 6%N 64m O O m N o to N H vi m M m (Yi N ff> fA m Q O O N N e7 Cl) O 49 m f9 O (0 O co 0 Cl) m o �r O N 0 0 w N 7 O m 0 0? (o 64 Cl) Cl) 6% f; rn 0 V> N U) o ri O 'D V> O m m t 2 N N O O UJ O 0 v m n o 69 v> N_ O O O 6% o O f9 H m m O m O o N m m o Co o n O O CO c o o p 'O C9 b N E N t0 N y a) m U) 0 0 U- 3 LL `m ,e 3 o H 5 C 0 w V o `o o C L N Y v U N o O O r O F m m o m ci o N N V� to 0 o E 0 u U v? a p m I o Zvi V m N NJ to V> r m w n r0 m 10 o e 0 V C N p 6 O W (O N N W F O m N p N V m N N fA of Iq N 02 Le) n m 6% M 0 N N uJ 1-s N M 6% 0 0 U c 0 N (o r M N T o oV o o) v 44 rn c H ff> r cn p N O Lo 0 0 co H O m cN H o rn w Vk &9. 6% r N o m N m O e O m M o e 0 O O 0? N O o O O N m M m N O N N o N m m O O N m o f9 n cl) m c N o> L'i M O tq r fA m m t'f r O c O O N N 'n 'O N j N F9m O 0) o o 0 N m o o 8 CV N o fy O N O o O O O m v O m C O d' to Vi 0 n m iR N O N O y Z C y fo o N _N U Of o 4' LT U C m y 6, m E c o 0 O o o o Nvyo 0 m e O O N m O m r n o o m m o C9 O r t o m 0 0 m o N +�y L m V M m r N 00 ti f9 0 C N r o r-+ O Y N 7 no r U cC m v o C e 00? o oG C m rn w N y N d O w 0.L w O U U L 4-- a N Wt m 0 a 3 3 E� LL m m E T m w m L a. L N m C C N F m o i E o a E E Y E w O 2 a rn n o E U¢ U¢ U v 10 N In t0 O o r m O Cl) v 'o o m o r n o 'ti m v (o V> C9 m N m N o N L O O Cl) o O o v C9 N co to O m N N c� m v M m 69 m v> m V N f` 0+ 6 m r o m N 4> f9 v n N m o N h O m N r Cl) m N_ H M l`7 N iR N N m (O 6%N 64m O O m N o to N H vi m M m (Yi N ff> fA m Q O O N N e7 Cl) O 49 m f9 O (0 O co 0 Cl) m o �r O N 0 0 w N 7 O m 0 0? (o 64 Cl) Cl) 6% f; rn 0 V> N U) o ri O 'D V> O m m t 2 N N O O UJ O 0 v m n o 69 v> N_ O O O 6% o O f9 H m m O m O o N m m o Co o n O O CO c o o p 'O C9 b N E N t0 N y a) m U) 0 0 U- 3 LL `m ,e 3 o H 5 C 0 w V o `o o C L N Y v U I m N m o N L z`! n O m O r No r o I wig° m m m M ci o N N V� to I 4'Y E O th N N O_ u U v? a p m I o Zvi V m m O O V> r m w n 6q y W W (O N N W F O m N p r 'o r o o co co j of Iq N 02 Le) O N 6% M IA m FA 0 0 U c 0 N (o r M N 44 rn c H ff> r cn LO m m O O a H o rn w Vk m r N o m N m a o m N N m N o o a O m N m m O O N m o f9 n m O o O r o> L'i M O tq r fA m m t'f r O m 'n 'O N j h m F9m m 0 0) m o O N O o O O O m v O N d' to Vi 0 n m iR I m N m o m< use> o r N 'a N 0 m C9 E�9 C9 tq N to m o O o c m co w to N T L T U m m E m L E n u U v? a p y y m m L U S n v y C y 9 p N W (O N N W F O m N p O C o o Q m ca U o f U F m m o 0 0 U c 0 w` Q Q p Y fA U 251 L King County Metropolitan King G. Anne Noris, Clerk of the L, King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room 1200 Seattle, WA 98104 -3272 Tel: 206 296 -1020 Fax: 206 -205 -8165 TTY/TDD 206 296 -1024 Email: anne.noris @kingcounty.gov Web: www.kingcounty.gov /council /clerk June 27, 2011 Mr. Pat Brodin, Operations Manager City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Brodin, Monetary Reauirements for 2012 EXHIBIT The Metropolitan King County Council approved the sewer rate for 2012 and the sewage treatment capacity charge for 2012 with the adoption of Ordinance 17102 on June 13, 2011. A copy of Ordinance 17102 is enclosed for your information. If you have any questions, please call the Clerk of the Council's Office at 206 296- 1020. Sincerely, Anne Noris Clerk of the Council Enclosure 252 KING COUNTY 1200 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Signature Report King County June 14, 2011 Ordinance 17102 Proposed No. 2011-0211.1 Sponsors Patterson 1 AN ORDINANCE determining the monetary requirements 2 for the disposal of sewage for the fiscal year beginning 3 January 1, 2012, and ending December 31, 2012, setting 4 the sewer rate for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2012, 5 and ending December 31, 2012, and approving the amount 6 of the sewage treatment capacity charge for 2012, in 7 accordance with RCW 35.58.570; and amending Ordinance 8 12353, Section 2, as amended, and K.C.C. 4.90.010, and 9 Ordinance 11398, Section 1, as amended, and K.C.C. 10 28:84.055. 11 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: 12 SECTION 1. Ordinance 12353, Section 2, as amended, and K.C.C. 4.90.010 are 13 each hereby amended to read as follows: 14 A. Having determined the monetary requirements for the disposal. of sewage, the 15 council hereby adopts a ((2414)) 2012 sewer rate of thirty -six dollars and ten cents per 16 residential customer equivalent per month. Once a sewer rate ordinance becomes 17 effective, the clerk of the council is directed to deliver a copy of that ordinance to each .18 agency having an agreement for sewage disposal with King County. 1 253 Ordinance 17102 19 B. The King County council approves the application of Statement of Financial 20 Accounting Standards No. 71 (FAS 71) to treat pollution remediation obligations ((ate 21 flie fifst staA tip eosts n° eenst etion ne" plant as regulatory assets, and 22 establish a rate stabilization reserve for the purpose of leveling rates between years. 23 C. As required for FAS 71 application, amounts are to be placed in the rate 24 stabilization reserve from operating revenues and removed from the calculation of debt 25 service coverage. The reserve balance shall be an amount at least sufficient to maintain a 26 level sewer rate between 2011 and 2012, and shall be used solely for the purposes of: 27 maintaining the level sewer rate in 2012; and if additional reserve balance is available, 28 moderating future rate increases beyond 2012. ((l- €Ahe)) The estimated amount of the 29 reserve, as shown in the financial forecast, Attachment A to this 30 ordinance. shall be revised in accordance with the 2012 adopted budget and financial 31 plan. If the reserve needs to be reduced to meet debt service coverage requirements for 32 ((249)) 2011, the county executive shall notify the council of the change by providing 33 an updated financial forecast. 34 D. The executive shall provide monthly cost reports to the council on Brightwater 35 as outlined in K.C.C. 28.86.165. 36 SECTION 2. Monetary requirements for the disposal of sewage as defined by 37 contract with the component sewer agencies for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 38 2012, and ending December 31, 2012. The council hereby determines the monetary 39 requirements for the disposal of sewage as follows: 40 Administration, operating, maintenance repair and replace (net of other income): 41 $65,103,007. 2 254 Ordinance 17102 42 Establishment and maintenance of necessary working capital reserves: 43 423,087,057. 44 Requirements of revenue bond resolutions (not included in above items and net of 45 interest income): $264,193,203. 46 TOTAL: $306,209,153. 47 SECTION 3. Ordinance 11398, Section 1, as amended, and K.C.C. 28.84.055 are 48 each hereby amended as follows: ((The amount Vl LIIV 1994 metrop 50 adopted by-I��i .ncn n sh e seve d o ll ars n th r esidential e .V. J11Rll VV JVYVfI L1V 11RLJ IJC� 51 52 B. The amount of the 1995 meir-epelitan sewage f6eility eapaeity ehar-ge adopted 53 b3�.C.C28.84.050. h a �r"r a nm r- oc- o ci 'crroir a c- Jr�zcntrcr rccx'acvrrrcrvr 54 a V tial eu a l er t r fif aoo I VJ1Q 55 56 residential customer or equivalent for fifteen years fef sewef eefmeetiens ee 58 59 1. 050.0. shall be seven dollars per- month per residential euste alent fe 60 fifteen years fer sewer-eenneetions eeetiming between and ineluding jantiaFy 1, 1997, a 61 Deeembef 3 62 63 2 1 F.S1. 050.0. shall be ten dollars and fifty eents per menth pef residential eustemer- e 3 255 Ordinance 17102 T Th f t r ea t me n t 't 1, rte adop 1� Y C 1` 66 r— rnc umvci the se �c c rraibv ccavPrca o� -rc.�� N OW 70 G. Th of the sewag t :ea t,,, „t eapa eity 1,. ge adopted I,..7I1 .0 ..Erg S 72 equivalent for fifteen years for- sewer- eenneetio between and ineludifig K III U Th t he t:. b d te b TIC C 74 r�rnv �cr` iirsc t n b�� °P`�° °J i��c� ffW TYMIM, 76 equivalent for fifteen years fof sewer- eenneefie between and ineluding 78 1. Th .,....,....t of the sewage t ...,,.;t„ ,.1,.. ne a d o pt e d by K C Q 79 2: ^.050.0 s h a ll be seventeen dolt.. and twent ee to ntb residential 80 oustemer- er- equivalent fef fifteen year-s for- sewer- eenneetie between and it.17s!!��:R'.si[iltiTiTiTr� 82 j. The ameunt ef the sewage tfeatment eapaeity eharge adopted by K.C.C, Mm 84 eu equ i v aleti t f or- f; flee years f or- eenn eetio :n- _bePA,een aiu or- NO Ordinance MO2 I 88 71st-- Hf7tt1 j 89 4ec 90 91 92 93 94 95 U 94 96 97 98 99 7 100 fe r 1 01 An 102 103 104 105 106 The--w 2,141:31HAll 107 5 2F 86` 87 2-9 �4 I 88 71st-- Hf7tt1 j 89 4ec 90 91 92 93 94 95 U 94 96 97 98 99 7 100 fe r 1 01 An 102 103 104 105 106 The--w 2,141:31HAll 107 5 2F Ordinance 17102 108 eurr -inn between an 109 110 K.C.C. 111 2F.? -050.0. al 112 eustomer- or- equivalent for fifteen years for sewer eenneetie between and 113 2014. 114 115 28.84.050.0. shall be fifty dollars and fbAy five eents per- menth per- residential eustomer- 116 E)r- equivalent fef fifteen years for- sewer- eenneeti I—tween and- ineluding 117 The amount of the metropolitan sewap-e 118 facilitv capacity charee adopted by K.C.C. 28.84.050.0. that is charp-ed monthlv for 119 fifteen vears per residential customer or residential customer equivalent shall be: 120 1. Seven dollars for sewer connections occurring between and includine Januar",I 121 1. 1994, and December 31, 1997; 122 2. Ten dollars and fiftv cents for sewer connections occurrine between and, 123 includinp- January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2001, 124 3. Seventeen dollars and twentv cents for sewer connections occurrinp- between 125 and includine January 1, 2002, and December 31. 2002; 126 4. Seventeen dollars and sixtv cents for sewer connections occurring between 127 and includine January 1, 2003, and December 31.2003; 128 5. Eip-hteen dollars for sewer connections occurring between and includin! 129 January 1. 2004, and December 31, 2004; 0 W Ordinance 17102 130 6. Thirtv -four dollars and five cents for sewer connections occurring between 131 and including January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2006: 132 7. Forty -two dollars for sewer connections occurrine between and includine 133 January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2007, 134 8. Fortv -six dollars and twentv -five cents for sewer connections occurriniy 135 between and includinp- January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2008: 136 9. Fortv -seven dollars and sixty -four cents for sewer connections occurrine 137 between and includine January 1. 2009. and December 31.2009: 138 10. Fortv -nine dollars and seven cents for sewer connections occurrins between 139 and includinp- January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2010: 140 11. Fifty dollars and forty -five cents for sewer connections occurrine between 141 and including January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2011: and 142 12. Fiftv -one dollars and ninetv -five cents for sewer connections occurrine 143 between and including January 1. 2012. and December 31. 2012. 144 B.1. In accordance with adopted policy FP- 15.3.d. in the Regional Wastewater 145 Services Plan, K.C.C. 28.86.160.C., it is the council's intent to base the capacity charge 146 upon the costs, customer growth and related financial assumptions used in the Regional 147 Wastewater Services Plan. 148 2. In accordance with adopted policy FP- 6 in the Regional Wastewater Services 149 Plan, K.C.C. 28.86.160.C, the council hereby approves the cash balance and reserves as 150 contained in the attached financial plan for ((2044)) 2012. 151 3. In accordance with adopted policy FP- 15.3.c., King County shall pursue 152 changes in state legislation to enable the county to require payment of the capacity charge 7 259 Ordinance 17102 153 in a single payment, while preserving the option for new ratepayers to finance the 154 capacity charge. 155 Ordinance 17102 was introduced on 5/2/2011 and passed by the Metropolitan King County Council on 6/13/2011, by the following vote: Yes: 8 Mr. Phillips, Mr. von Reichbauer, Mr. Gossett, Ms. Hague, Ms. Patterson, Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Dunn and Mr. McDermott No: 0 Excused: 1 Ms. Lambert KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON /arryssett, Chair ATTEST: T Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council i v f APPROVED this t day of V N fF— 2011. w Dow Constantine, County Executive Attachments: A. Wastewater Treatment Division Financial Plan for the 2012 Proposed Sewer Rate H. M.1 _Q) NN� 6L L 3 d d CL 0 L a _N N W r.+ L 0 a v C V.. C 0 C C G V d L 3 as Q Z W 2 U H Q N O_ ti r rNo CO V m O N M t` u U t` 69 O W N O tL J M to o 0) tD M t0 N N M c M fD U t� O N 0 3 O N O N O Cl) 10 to `t U f` FA O W N U t` tb O M M N r H V Gi c O U f` (A M O N N O LL F-- N OD 00 M N N O m O tD to 0 r M M U t 69 to O N N O LL r-- O 0 N N OO O to N U 0 6H m N N lL h O to 00 N (D M V N O 6 r C.) cD N O W O N M CD V O .0 0 0 V LO o E N y a M O O m CD m O l0 M to N O V (D to t` W (3) to O M r M M (D f` to V m Oct (O 00 tD Or rN" V V M v 00 M V N C :s 00 O V O O V• O O O 0) O V• N 00 o O a mv o my o morn 0) N N O O' to Cl n N V O O r O r r V V to O N M M O N r to l0 N N O O (0 N 00 V O O V to O R OD 00 Cl) to M N W W M M r N M 0 0 M N t` M tD O m tD to V to 1n N M r O n O O N 00 M r W V M N t- m m 00 M G O G (0 N (D n(n (Dh M 0ON Mr on 0 0003 O to O' r Oo oc V N r r tf) f` m M (D it V N M M v V r r M V v N rnMtnomo c) oM Mtn 0) v Mm to V 03 O to t0 m 0 (n M V't Om r co O n O O 0 t0 V t7) N M CIJ 04 Cl) to N N N N N V Cl) V v N MOto0 0 V Mtn 0RG OOO N V f` O Cl) h O m N M r 00 O f� O M O (0 f` (0 N v m O O O LO to (D r 03 tD O N r r r O r N M Cl) V N r N N N N v N r M Cl) V v (D V O m O t0 n m to to to 0 t� O 0000 r h m 0 t (0 t` V -It Cl) r ED O O N N t0 (0 O V V O: N M V r to O (0 t0 Mr N(000N CO t-- (D r C) N NrM O V N O m r v v 'IT r to Cl) t) v (D N N O w (0 (D M Cl) t� V (0 O N N V CO O M m (0 O m V m 0 OD M r r N (v 00 V r In M N m t: tl to m V O m 00 r m O M M M tD r v (D r r- M M M V M' O (0 to N t` m W V�t O to (n Cl) V (D N M N i m 04 M N V In t() O (D (D tn m MOnt- t0 V V rO O VV m N to m h V (0 N r r O v M O to V r O O V r N N In r t0 N v M CD m w p F u a z D z U N LL w 2 t w w w Z w w w N a z 0 z 0 m W w 0 V Z w w w 0 12 a) a w g m° a X W p N W X�y 0 0U oa 0 J c z E E Z 3 c F w a ZZ O~ m H u a uF m F-O inz 0 w C mrp w mm U 2 m O U U a O F 0 a y z z m LU o< IL J F a 0 CL F- F F a W w wIx U U w w U U w w W to m m o 0 w U 2 W O m z Z >IrQ w w m F w m 0 a p Q w a a w w a Z w Z 000 U p 5 z Oy0 NaLL J z�, m (9 Z Z LL p N m z wam z d a a a ?J� w 00 O O O V V O O r O O O O O O tD O 00 V O N N to O to O tf) tr) O O' to It O N M to O O r O r lf') (p fD N M N r to M 00 M V (D (D M r O r N N O 00000(D V O V O O N t- O Cl) O O n r O h M to O N O N N O O O to t` N to CO h O O (D O (D W U') toT N M V ry N M Go M 00 V tl') V m r O r N N O V O V O V• N 0) tD h O h 0 t- h O 00 O M M V N to O 00 O 00 to O r) t- W (D N 0i t` Ui O t O n t� to to M h m r v N to r (D tp V T N lq O O v N N NOOO mr W (D f` O OOO O h N O O 00 (D m 00 O M O M Cl) tfi OON(n 13 i G O0 Oc pl O NON N (O N r N (D r l(v to to t0 O r M W z r m O N N OO-OoN W LO -q MOM V V O O N W t0 M M t M' W 't O't O to 00L� NN N r0 (D to N f` M t0 M N M M O O O N O t` V N t0 O M V (D (D O N O 000 tf)O(0O 00 mm0 N MOM N O OMmtn tOn O (0 V V O V t`O h N LO to 00 to m m 00 r h m M to m to N N O O (D O O h n N In V V O O t0 (D O OO VO N mO0 V O c 0 O O O Om MN tq(D V (DN V V O Nto t` U•) O to M N o v m to a) to N N V m 0 0 w w N w of F- tn W W zZ w v O p z W j F W LL J U U ttj w 2 O+ m a J a' N m c W N N W z< to K M Z F Z z u LLJ z D m uN 0�< g p t p LLJ Z z 0 O 7 z w w U m Z u N Z 0 7 m e E w U >UJCO Oa 4N)� O U C7 fA �O LL x <w >z z z w O y ep 2 i J M W w 2r U O J a) O 7 7 m J N a. N Ur tl U) C7 m �L `mp a mzmn a z o'a� z c m wa> Uot` -F c 0030< w 0ma0 L) 261 262 Exhibit C -1 Residential Water Rate Comparison as of Oct 2011 2011 TOTAL 56.05 54.84 52.78 I 51.091 50.951 50.901 48.90 46.32 44.75 44.50 N 44.36 44.23 43.78 42.26 42.15 39.06 37.50 37.47 37.01 36.05 32.36 31.15 30.68 27.13 24.21 2010 RATE 54.36 53.07 51.24 51.09 46.25 1 I 46.90 1 43.69 1 33.00 40.75 40.80 42.35 2012 Difference TOTAL 1.69 61.10 1.77 59.21 2011 Summer Ranking CITY 1 ISEATTLE 2 BELLEVUE 3 KENT 4 ISSAQUAH 5 HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT 6 TUKWILA 2012 7 TUKWILA 2011 8 SKYWAY (CWA) 9 1KING COUNTY WD #20 10 I KING COUNTY WD #125 11 1COVINTON (CWA) (every 2 mos.) 12 WOODINVILLE 13 COAL CREEK 14 DUVALL 15 SOOS CREEK 16 EDMONDS 17 WATER DISTRICT 119 (Duvall) 18 REDMOND (CWA) 19 RENTON 20 KIRKLAND 21 AUBURN 22 1MERCER ISLAND 23 I TACOMA 24 I LYNNWOOD 25 LLAKEHAVEN (FEDERAL WAY) Residential Sewer Rate Comparison as of July 2011 2011 Summer 36.32 City Base Rates Consumption Rate Per CCF Assume 10 CCF 1 13.00 3.98/4.63 43.05 1 27.44 2.74 27.40 1 11.99 3.77/4.80 40.79 1 23.45 1.51 /3.60 27.64 1 12.15 3.88 1 38.80 1 12.00 3.89 38.90 10.00 3.89 1 38.90 13.88 1 3.08/3.90 1 32.44 19.75 1 2.50 25.00 12.50 3.20 32.00 16.50 2.53/3.81 27.86 13.43 3.08 30.801 16.88 2.69 26.901 22.61 4.33 19.65 9.65 3.25 32.50 19.16 1.99 19.90 37.50 2.90 0.00 12.67 1.55/3.10 24.80 13.76 1.98/2.67 23.25 16.40 1 3.93 19.65 10.38 2.06/2.52 21.98 9.25 2.19 21.90 16.03 1.30/1.63 14.65 12.63 1.45 14.50 13.11 1.11 11.10 Residential Sewer Rate Comparison as of July 2011 2011 0.70 36.32 2.74 I 2011 City Ranking CITY 31.36 2010 Charge 1 SEATTLE KC 67.35 40.781 2 LAKEHAVEN 58.58 28.81 3 VASHON SEWER KC 56.00 26.34 1 4 IDUVALL 62.35 5 SKYWAY KC 56.22 25.05 6 RENTON KC 48.72 23.88 7 SAMMAMISH PLATEAU KC 52.17 23.00 8 WOODINVILLE KC 54.451 23.79 9 NE SAMMAMISH KC 51.93 1 20.63 10 BELLEVUE KC 41.84 20.33 11 1TUKWILA 2012 KC 19.26 12 CEDAR RIVER W S KC 49.65 18.64 13 BOTHELL KC 49.56 18.171 14 ISSAQUAH KC 48.18 18.01 15 COAL CREEK KC 48.96 17.40 16 1KENT KC 48.26 16.61 1 17 1TUKWILA 2011 KC 45.29 1 16.06 18 MERCER ISLAND KC 46.56 16.05 19 SOOS CREEK KC 47.45 16.05 1 20 BLACK DIAMOND KC 51.06 15.29 1 21 LAKE FOREST PARK KC 46.66 14.76 22 AUBURN KC 44.051 13.36 23 ALDERWOOD KC 46.031 12.57 24 REDMOND KC 44.221 12.32 25 KIRKLAND KC 47.65 12.03 26 VALLEY VIEW SEWER KC 40.90 10.00 27 NORTHSHORE KC 44.00 10.00 28 ALGONA KC 41.02 9.12 29 SOUTHWEST Suburban Sewer 25.50 25.50 30 MIDWAY 22.00 22.00 1AVERAGE 45.661 W \PW Eng \OTHER \Gail Labanara \Water Sewer Documents \Utility Rate Surveys Water, Sewer SSWM.xlsx King County Sewer 36.10 36.10 36.10 36.10 37.26 36.10 33.97 36.10 36.10 36.10 36.10 1 36.10 1 36.10 1 36.10 36.10 36.10 36.10 36.10 36.10 36.10 36.10 36.10 36.10 36.10 36.10 36.10 36.10 0.00 0.00 1.541 0.00 4.70 2.00 I 2.00 2.63 11.75 3.75 3.56 1.88 50.90 46.40 41.45 0.70 36.32 2.74 I 35.72 N 1.75 N 31.36 5.65 42.91 36.86 30.31 2.05 28.45 2.70 29.43 1.25 30.69 18.62 1 5.59 2011 Total 2012 76.88 64.91 62.44 62.35 61.15 61.14 62.34 59.10 57.76 56.73 1 56.43 I 55.36 IT 54.74 54.27 54.11 53.50 52.71 52.16 52.15 52.15 51.39 50.86 49.46 48.67 48.42 48.13 46.10 46.10 45.22 25.50 22.00 52.64 1 48.79 263 Exhibit C -2 SINGLE FAMILY SURFACE WATER RATES AS OF OCTOBER 2011 N L T Ili N r1 'O T O j i M �n C C C rH O r6 ci 4! C M 7 In N O O O O M y 6 r0 N C W N N 3 N on U N Z N Y Y J Y C O a) (n ]G 7 7 U- 7 E 5; H H H -6 CITY Seattle (range of fees) Duvall Redmond (range, minimum shown) Mercer Island Auburn Issaquah Newcastle Sammamish King County Shoreline Renton Kent Tukwila 2012 Tukwila 2011 Lynnwood Federal Way Tukwila 2010 $250.00 $200.00 $150.00 $100.00 $50.00 Monthly Rate 19.58 I 16.92 16.56 14.96 14.95 14.08 13.28 12.50 11.08 11.50 10.37 10.06 8.50 I 7.75 I 7.20 I 7.10 I 7.08 I 2011 Yearly Rate 234.96 203.04 198.72 179.52 179.40 168.96 159.36 150.00 133.00 138.01 124.44 120.72 102.00 93.00 86.40 85.15 85.00 2012 Yearly Rate 261.72 138.12 102.00 Seriesl N 4J N 90.24 WAPW Eng \OTHER \Gail Labanara \Water Sewer Documents \Utility Rate Surveys Water, Sewer SSWM.xlsx 264 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A NEW PUBLIC WORKS FEE SCHEDULE; AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 1728. WHEREAS, each year the City analyzes the rate model for the three utility enterprise funds, which are water, sewer and surface water, to ensure revenues keep pace with expenses, to update the traffic model, and to analyze the transportation network to ensure continued compliance with the Growth Management Act and the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized to impose fees to recoup the costs of services rendered, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Public Works fees will be charged according to the following schedule, which shall supersede any previously adopted Public Works Fee Schedule: PUBLIC WORKS FEE SCHEDULE PERMIT DESCRIPTION Type A (Short-Term Nonprofit) Type B (Short -Term Profit) Type C (Infrastructure and Grading on Private Property and City Right -of -Way and Disturbance of City Right -of -Way) Type D (Long -Term) Type E (Potential Disturbance of City Right -of -Way) Type F (Blanket Permits) Additional Inspections Franchise Telecommunications Franchise Cable Street Vacation FEE 50.00 $100.00 $250.00 application base fee, plus four components based on construction value: 1) Plan Review 2) Construction Inspection 3) Pavement Mitigation 4) Grading Plan Review $100.00 $100.00 $250.00 processing fee, plus $5,000.00 cash deposit, withdraw $100.00 per instance for inspection $60.00 per inspection $5,000.00 administrative fee $5,000.00 plus 5% of total revenue $1,200.00 WAWord Processing- City\Resolutions \PW Fee Schedule -2011 10 -27 -1 Ldocx Page 1 of 5 265 PERMIT DESCRIPTION Latecomer's Agreements Flood Zone Control Copy of City of Tukwila's Infrastructure Design and Construction Standards WATER RATES Water Meter Installation .75 inch 1 inch 1.5 inch 2 inch 3 inch 4 inch 6 inch Water Meter Deduct Water Base Charge (Monthly) Single Family (one dwelling unit) Multi Family (more than one dwelling unit) Commercial /Industrial Customers: 3/4 inch Service 1 inch Service 1 -1/2 inch Service 2 inch Service 3 inch Service 4 inch Service 6 inch Service 8 inch Service 10 inch Service 12 inch Service Water Rates (Monthly) Single and Multi Family (Jan -May) Single and Multi Family (Jun -Sept) Single and Multi Family (Oct -Dec) Commercial /Industrial (Jan -May) Commercial /Industrial (Jun -Sept) Commercial /Industrial (Oct -Dec) Fire Protection Service Charges (Monthly) 2 inch Service 3 inch Service 4 inch Service 6 inch Service 8 inch Service 10 inch Service 12 inch Service FEE $500.00 processing fee, plus 17% administrative fee, plus $500.00 segregation fee $50.00 $50.00 600.00 1,100.00 2,400.00 2,800.00 4,400.00 7,800.00 $12,500.00 FEE $25.00 In addition to the monthly water base charge, each 100 cubic feet of water used will be charged as shown in "Water Rates (Monthly)." Current 2011 Proposed 2012 10.00 12.00 10.00" 12.00* *each dwelling unit 30.00 40.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 75.00 80.00 $100.00 $120.00 $145.00 $160.00 $195.00 $240.00 $290.00 $320.00 $385.00 $400.00 $480.00 $480.00 $575.00 In addition to the monthly water base charge listed above, each 100 cubic feet of water will be charged at the following rates: $2.79 $3.89 $2.79 $3.62 $4.98 $3.62 Per month based on size of service. 9.00 20.00 35.00 80.00 $120.00 $200.00 $260.00 W: \Word Processing -City \Resolutions \PW Fee Schedule -2011 10 -27 -1 l.docx Page 2 of 5 WATER SERVICES Water Turn On After Hour Water Turn On additional fee for customer requested after hours water turn on Unauthorized Water Usage after shut -off for non payment Special Meter Read customer requested meter read outside normal read schedule Shut -off notice Change in owner, tenant, and /or third party paying agent Fire Hydrant per month Emergency Conservation Sanction Temporary Water Meter Deposit .75" and 1" water meter 2.5" water meter Temporary Water Meter Rental per minimum 60 days expiration .75" and 1" water meter 2.5" water meter WATER INTEREST CHARGE On all water accounts 30 days in arrears from the date of delinquency until paid SEWER RATES Residential Sewer Service (single dwelling unit) Residential Sewer Service (multiple dwelling unit, permanent type) Commercial and Industrial Sewage Service SEWER INTEREST CHARGE On all sewer accounts 30 days in arrears from the date of delinquency until paid FEE 50.00 $100.00 $100.00 30.00 30.00 20.00 20.00 $100.00 300.00 $1,500.00 75.00 150.00 RATE 8% per annum computed on a monthly basis FEES Flat rate of $16.06 $19.26 per month [TMC 14.16.030 (1)] Flat rate of $16.06 $19.26 per month for each dwelling unit [TMC 14.16.030 (2)] Flat rate of $33.74 per month and, in addition, any usage over 750 cubic feet of water per month shall be at the rate of $23.1-2 $33.74 per 750 cubic feet [TMC 14.16.030 (4)] 1:7319 8% per annum computed on a monthly basis SURFACE WATER RATES FEE PER YEAR Surface Water Utility Rates Per Year Service Charge Per Acre Cateaorv: Current 2011 Proposed 2012 1. Natural $111.98 123.17 2. 0 20% Developed Surface $243.43 267.77 3. 21 50% Developed Surface $446.16 490.77 4. 51 70% Developed Surface $665.72 732.29 5. 71 85% Developed Surface $802.01 882.21 6. 86 100% Developed Surface $935.55 $1,029.10 7. Single Family Residential Parcels 93.00 per parcel 102.00 per parcel W: \Word Process ing City \Reso1u ions\PW Fee Schedule -2011 10- 27- 11.docx Page 3 of 5 267 SURFACE WATER INTEREST CHARGE RATE On all surface water accounts 30 days in arrears OTHER from the date of delinquency until paid 8% per annum computed on a monthly basis TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY TEST FEE SCHEDULE Fees for Residential Use $1,000 UNIT ALL TYPES OF RESIDENTIAL' Between 1 and 3 300.00 Between 4 and 5 600.00 Between 6 and 10 1,200.00 Between 11 and 15 2,000.00 Between 16 and 20 3,500.00 Between 21 and 25 5,000.00 Between 26 and 30 6,500.00 Between 31 and 40 8,000.00 Between 41 and 60 $10,000.00 Greater than 60 $12,000.00 All residential uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 200 -299, including single family, multi family, mobile home parks, and shared housing $4,000 I $7,200 Fees for Non Residential Use INSTITU- ALL GROSS FLOOR AREA TIONAL OTHER INDUSTRIAL OFFICE RETAIL EATERY PORT USES Less than 5,000 $1,000 $1,800 $2,700 $5,400 $500 $1,500 Between 5,001 and 10,000 $1,500 $2,700 $4,050 I $8,100 $1,000 $2,000 Between 10,001 and 20,000 $2,000 $3,600 $5,400 $10,800 $1,500 $2,500 Between 20,001 and 30,000 $3,000 $5,400 $8,100 $10,800 $2,000 $2,500 Between 30,001 and 40,000 $4,000 I $7,200 $10,800 $10,800 $2,500 $2,500 Between 40,001 and 50,000 $5,000 $9,000 $13,500 $10,800 $3,000 $2,500 Between 50,001 and 70,000 $6,000 $10,800 $16,200 $10,800 $4,000 $2,500 Between 70,001 and 90,000 $7,000 $12,600 $18,900 $10,800 $5,000 $2,500 Between 90,001 and 150,000 $8,000 $14,400 $21,600 $10,800 $6,000 $2,500 Between 150,001 and 200,000 $9,000 $16,200 $24,300 $10,800 $7,000 I $2,500 Greater than 200,000 $10,000 I $18,000 $24,300 $10,800 $8,000 $2,500 Z All industrial /agricultural uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 100 -199, including light and heavy industrial, manufacturing, and warehousing 3 All office, medical, and service related uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 600 -699, 700 -799, and 900 -999, including general office, medical facilities, and banks 4 All retail and recreation uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 400 -499, 800 -830 and 837 -899, including retail sales, rental sales, athletic clubs, and theaters 5 All food service uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 831 -836, excluding accessory (stand alone) drive through espresso stands (or similar) under 250 sq. ft. which are assessed $300 6 All institutional and transportation uses defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual Land Use Codes 000 -099 and 500 -599, including schools, places of worship, day care, terminals, and transit W: \Word Processing- City\Resolutions \PW Fee Schedule -2011 10- 27- 11.docx Page 4 of 5 i Section 2. Repealer. Resolution No. 1728 is hereby repealed. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 1 2011. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney WAWord Processinb City\ResolutionsTW Fee Schedule -2011 10- 27- 11.docx Allan Ekberg, Council President Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Resolution Number: Page 5 of 5 269 MCI Utilities Committee Minutes November 15 2011- Paoe 2 C. 2012 Water. Sewer and Surface Water Rates Staff is seeking Council approval of a resolution adopting a new Public Works Fee Schedule which will reflect increased water, sewer, and surface water rates for 2012. Water. In order to maintain current levels of service and lessen the impact of future increases to purchased water, staff is recommending an increase to the minimum water meter charge from $10.00 to $12.00 for residential customers and for commercial /industrial, from $30.00 $480.00 to $40.00 $575.00 (see draft resolution for specific service charges). Water revenue remains flat due to the economic downturn and decreased consumption. Increasing the base rate is the most logical cost increase implementation since consumption levels are not changing. A portion of the increase provides for continuing operational and capital needs. Additionally, Cascade Water Alliance rates are projected to increase 9.2% in 2012. Sewer. King County will not be increasing their monthly sewer rate; however, there will be an increase in their sewer capacity charge for new sewer connections made in 2012 for next 15 years. Staff is proposing a 20% increase for City sewer fees with residential customers increasing, from $16.06 to $19.26 and commercial /industrial increasing from $28.12 to $33.74. The Sewer Enterprise Fund still remains low with the impact of the interfund utility tax and the working capital reserve fund. However, with the rate comparison with adjoining cities, Tukwila remains in the middle of the range. Surface Water. Staff is proposing a 10% increase to surface water fees in 2012. Surface Water fees would increase from $93.00 to $102.00 per year for residential parcels. Commercial /industrial properties would increase from $111.98 $935.55 to $123.17 to $1,029.10. Even with the increase, Tukwila surface water rates remain low compared with other cities. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. III. MISCELLANEOUS Meeting adjourned at 5:26 p.m. Next meeting: Per pending 2012 Committee Calendar A Committee Chair Approval Minutes by KAM. Reviewed by GL. 271 272 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials ITEM NO. Meeting Date Prepared by e 1 Mayor's review I C un it review 11/28/11 BG .1.*& C- 12/05/11 BGW 4 1 ITEM INFORMATION I CAS NUMBER: ST'AI F SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON ORIGINALAGENDA DATE: 11/28/11 AGI NDA I'rEMTrrI,E 2012 Annual Small Drainage Program Design Consultant Agreement with KPG, Inc. CA'I'I?GORY ®Discussion ®Motion E] Resolution F Ordinance ❑Bidflavard F Public Hearing Other 111tg Date 11/28/11 Mtg Date 12/05/11 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Aft Date Mtg Date SPONSOR Council E] Ma HR DCD .Finance Fire IT P &R Police PIFI SPONSOR'S This contract is for design of the 2012 Small Drainage Program. Three consultant firms SUMMARY were short- listed from the Consultant Works Roster and KPG was chosen as the most qualified. This year five sites are being designed and seven sites are scheduled for construction (two were designed in 2011). Council is being asked to approve the design contract with KPG, Inc. in the amount of $64,945.76. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 1 1/15/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: DE'SEAN QUINN RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Public Works COMMIT "rEI? Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole. COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURIH R1-:QUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $64,945.76 $80,000.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 412 SURFACE WATER (PG 138, 2012 PROPOSED CIP) Comments: MTG. DATE 11/28/11 12/05/11 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS 11/28/11 I Informational Memorandum dated 11/10/11 vicinity Map Qualification Ratings Contract with KPG, Inc with Scope of Work and Fee Minutes from the Utilities Committee meetings of 11/15/11 12/05/11 273 274 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Utilities Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director DATE: November 10, 2011 SUBJECT: 2012 Annual Small Drainaqe Proqram Project No. 91241201 Consultant Selection and Agreement ISSUE Approve KPG, Inc. to design the 2012 Annual Small Drainage Program. BACKGROUND The Annual Small Drainage Program repairs surface water projects that are identified through maintenance activities as well as citizen complaints. This year, we are proposing the design of five projects for construction in 2012. Construction of these five projects will be combined with two projects designed in 2011 which were delayed. DISCUSSION Public Works staff reviewed the list of known system deficiencies and compiled a list of five projects for design in 2012. The five projects selected are: 1. Gilliam Creek, Southcenter Blvd Crossing 4. Ryan Hill Pipe Repairs 2. S 128th Street/37 Ave S Pipe Repair 5. Fort Dent Outfall Improvements 3. Tukwila Parkway Outfall The Fort Dent Outfall Improvements will rebuild a failing riverbank and outfall and retrofit the system with a secondary floodgate to reduce the risk of flooding within Fort Dent Park. Since this park drainage system is not part of the City's surface water system, funding from the City's share of the King County Flood District Opportunity Fund will be used for design and construction (approximately $45,000.00). The current Consultant Roster was reviewed and three firms were short- listed to design the selected five projects. The firms were: KPG, Inc., PACE Engineers, and CH2M Hill. The Summary of Qualifications was evaluated for each firm and KPG, Inc. was selected as the firm that best met the requirements. KPG has designed the Annual Small Drainage Program since 1991 and Public Works staff continues to be very satisfied with their work. KPG has an excellent working relationship with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, is knowledgeable of City requirements, remains flexible to design changes, and continues to complete designs within the contracted amount. It is recommended that KPG, Inc. design the 2012 Annual Small Drainage Program for a fee of $64,945.76. BUDGET SUMMARY FROM 2012 PROPOSED CIP Design RECOMMENDATION Contract Budqet 64,945.76 80,000.00 Council is being asked to approve this design agreement with KPG, Inc. in the amount of $64,945.76 for the 2012 Annual Small Drainage Program and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular Meeting. Attachments: Location Map Qualification Review Consultant Agreement W: \PW Eng \PROJECTSW- OR Projects \91241201 (2012 SDP) \Design \INFORMATION MEMO -2011 doc 275 W 2012 Annual Neighborhood Drainage Program Site 2 Site 1 1 AE Site 4 s S,MI�SI� s, `3 £I S130N5 3511 SI a a �rU 1 �a —h St Site 3 E A 'f m r mie�„eo- camo of rniam o. s zoous Date: November 9, 2011 277 2 O Not to Scale Site 5 n T sue IIIs1 rr —�1 a s ,�4m J aT f h s,soeY sr a ms'��1�� �a —h St Site 3 E A 'f m r mie�„eo- camo of rniam o. s zoous Date: November 9, 2011 277 2 O Not to Scale Site 5 MKI c1r) r C r M r N J r N N r N .�J r N cy r r c9 r r r r r o'� r N N d 1 r N U a Q ki N T o u W t d 1 o o 'd Jr 0 W N ?X G SC a Cl. a N N 4 a N r N N N d 'o a 0 N U w -s d rn W a x CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR DRAINAGE DESIGN SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, Washington, herein -after referred to as "the City and KPG, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified. 1.. Project Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to perform drainage design services in connection with the project titled 2012 Annual Neighborhood Drainage Program. 2: Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies. 3. Time for Performance. Work under this contract shall commence upon the giving of written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement within 365 calendar days from the date written notice is given to proceed, unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City. 4. Payment. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services rendered under this Agreement as follows: A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed $64,945.76 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress of the work for partial payment for that portion of the project completed to date. Such vouchers will be checked by the City and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be made to the Consultant in the amount approved. C. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract price earned will be made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the completion of the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City. D. Payment is provided in this section shall be full compensation for work performed, services rendered, and for all materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City and state for a period of three (3) years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon request. 281 5, Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, drawings, specifications and other materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this Agreement shall be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is executed or not. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said documents, drawings, specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than the project specified in this Agreement. 6. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services to be rendered under this Agreement. 7. Indemnification. The Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims, losses or liability, including attorney's fees, arising from injury or death to persons or damage to property occasioned by any act; omission or failure of the Consultant, its officers, agents and employees, in performing the work required by this Agreement. With respect to the perform- ance of this Agreement and as to claims against the City, its officers, agents and employees, the Consultant expressly waives its immunity under Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington, the Industrial Insurance Act, for injuries to its employees, and agrees that the obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless provided for in this paragraph extends to any claim brought by or on behalf of any employee of the Consultant. This waiver is mutually negotiated by the parties. This paragraph shall not apply to any damage resulting from the sole negligence of the City, its agents and employees. To the extent any of the damages referenced by this paragraph were caused by or resulted from the concurrent negligence of the City, its agents or employees, this obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless is valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the Consultant, its officers, agents and employees. Insurance. The Consultant shall secure and maintain in force throughout the duration of this contract comprehensive general liability insurance, with a minimum coverage of $500,000 per occurrence and $1,000,000 aggregate for personal injury; and $500,000 per occurrence/ aggregate for property damage, and professional liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000. Said general liability policy shall name the City of Tukwila as an additional named insured and shall include a provision prohibiting cancellation of said policy except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. Certificates of coverage as required by this section shall be delivered to the City within. fifteen (15) days of execution of this Agreement. 9. Independent Contractor. The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an inde- pendent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the Consultant shall 2 M:i be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to the Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant. 10. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 11. Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it under this Agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin, religion, creed, age, sex or the presence of any physical or sensory handicap in the selection and retention of employees or procurement of materials or supplies. 12. Assignment. The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. 13. Non Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 14. Termination. A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant. B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses. 15. Attorneys Fees and Costs. In the event either party shall bring suit against the other to enforce any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such suit shall be entitled to recover its costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred in such suit from the losing party. 3 MR, 16. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Notices to Consultant shall be sent to the following address: KPG, Inc. 753 9th Avenue N. Seattle, WA 98109 17. Integrated Agreement. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the City and the Consultant. DATED this day of 2011 CITY OF TUKWILA Jim Haggerton, Mayor CONSULTANT By' Nelson Davis, KPG Principal Title: Attest/Authenticated: Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney 4 MEI Exhibit A City of Tukwila 2012 Annual Small Drainage Program Scope of Work November 8, 2011 KPG The Consultant shall prepare base maps, final plans, specifications, and estimates for the following small drainage projects: Site 1: Gilliam Creek, S 154 Street crossing Finalize wall design developed in 2011 Small Drainage Program and provide pipe liner rehabilitation of existing pipe crossing 42 Avenue S. This site will require a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) from Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). Site 2: S 128 Street 37 Avenue S Pipe Repairs Provide replacement and /or pipe liner rehabilitation on 6 pipe reaches in the vicinity of S 128 Street intersection with 37 Avenue S and the adjacent Wells Trucking parcel. This site will require an HPA from WDFW. Site 3: Tukwila Parkway Outfall Provide realignment and replacement of the outfall pipe that discharges north of the recent Klickitat project. This site will require an HPA from WDFW. Site 4: Ryan Hill Pipe Repairs Provide manhole and pipe replacement and /or pipe liner rehabilitation on 3 pipe reaches in the vicinity of S 109 Street intersection with 41 Avenue S and repair the existing outfall on 49 Avenue South. This site will require an HPA from WDFW. Site 5: Fort Dent Outfall Improvements Install new manhole in levee, flap gate on 15 -inch outfall pipe, and repair outfall area as necessary. This project is included as a stand -alone design task (Task 2) due to grant funding from King County Flood District Operations Fund. This site will require an HPA from WDFW. Work on these projects shall include any necessary survey, alternative analyses, quantity estimating and cost estimating to complete the projects. Surveyed base maps and horizontal utility locations will be provided for all sites. Right of way will be indicated on the base maps based on available assessor information. City of Tukwila 2012 Annual Small Drainage Program 1 of 2 KPG November 8, 2011 285 Exhibit A The Consultant shall prepare a SEPA checklist and JARPA application to obtain the HPA. The checklist and JARPA will cover all project sites in a single document. Geotechnical review of Site 1 will be provided to document soil conditions for design of the deep pipe crossing liner and recommendations for wall design parameters to be included in the specifications. It is our understanding that none of the projects will require biological assessments, additional permits, detention facilities, or water quality treatment facilities. The budget assumes a straightforward approval process with no special studies or extensive coordination. It is anticipated that the projects will be bid as one package for the 2012 Small Drainage Program. The Consultant shall perform base mapping, permit agency coordination, utility coordination, and preliminary design and cost estimating for each of the project sites to assist the City with prioritization for the bid package based on available funding and other considerations. For the 2012 Small Drainage Program, the Consultant shall submit 50% (plans and estimate only) and 90% plan, specification, and estimate submittals for City review prior to bidding. The City may reprioritize the projects based on estimated costs and available budget. Deliverables: The Consultant shall provide the following deliverables: Distribution of 50% Plans to utilities SEPA checklist JARPA application 2012 Small Drainage Program: 10 copies, 50% Plans and Estimates 5 copies, 90% Plans, Specifications and Estimates Full size mylar copy of Final Plans 10 copies,' /2 size Final Plans (Bond) 10 copies, Final Specifications 1 copy, Final Engineers Estimate Coordination and upload to BXWA.com The City shall provide the following items: Property owner contact information Plan reviews and comments Easement negotiations, if required. Fees associated with advertisement on BXWA.com city of Tukwila KPG 2012 Annual Small Drainage Program 2 of 2 November 8, 2011 i► dwG d x0 LL u�C �<q H oa �U •a• o U (n CD U m H CO 2 X W R Im O a` d Cri ett c t0 Q W 3 W w W N W c LL V N Z CC V d p o a` CD N d' co �t CD co �N O co N N O co co CD co O 00 (p co Mr*- U) 't to 'It r h CO r r N of.. t7 ;tt) O O CT) r to M 16 ui :CA to _M" co co O N w m It O ti ,M O 00 to 00 r to to O 0) O r O 'O O 0) "T M d' M t() CD to O CD N 0) N t` t0 N Co co iti� r` tp V O O CA N Q) N N .re M m O N -(D C i Sfl N N N N N Lf N c9 d' LL S V) h aQ) 7 C m 9J iA b O (a w co :E to C a) F.. t0 C A M U c a) d U E y 30 w mo Uo C :3 a r U) N LL to O a`) t Q) 0) M 9. T CD CL C T. W t o LO 0 a) Ca ,L LL co r b3 tfss»� ist»4»61) ds qqw e» to te t/3 tniflt� i A :Q 'D d CR tu N O y 3 V O O O O O O O N It N O 11 V N O N N d' LL S V) h aQ) 7 C m 9J d iA b O (a w co :E to C a) F.. y 0: a) a) H C A. N a W C N N �C d .a) C) U U U 'y F M IL Q W y F, (D a 0 0 Ca U °.:U y q E O M r M N co N o0 O -a0 co a0 O r- N O t y to i .N a) L ca r W 4 c It N v a -5 Qco1�ctrt E4JC7tLU R O O 6 Q N �`m C.Q.A`Q E O F LL O_ F- O 0 000000 00000 t c000 co y O ao CO N 00 N CO N d' CO CO CC) v M 'O co N O r r rt O N N N N N N V O N N -O N N le O N 287 ca A :Q 'D CR tu N O y 3 3 c U 0 o 0 0 CL S V) h aQ) 7 C m 9J d iA b O (a w co :E to C a) F.. y 0: a) a) H C A. N a W C N N �C N Y at r C/) .a) C) U U U 'y F M IL Q W y F, (D y C m a 0 0 Ca U °.:U y q p C b v y CJ C`0 N X _U M Z C� V y to i .N a) L ca a) 3 4 c It N v a -5 Qco1�ctrt E4JC7tLU o� 7 O O 6 Q N �`m C.Q.A`Q E f: F LL O_ N Ir N 0: 0- a a: Y y r N C+') "It to y r N M y CV N F- 287 �j ao {1111' Q fII r X LU N L w O a o� r �1 m Z5 1 U �G t' m r 30 T TN m J G C 'p "fir I fl uJ ke v m a O cp4 r t0 Q D1 c O tb Ul W o N W o ti zg N 0 a O V a '4 of 0 011 0 O ui N U 1 o. �o 111 'n r 1 to 1 1 r T I O_ d fl 1 N R r ID y N V 1 o t R %1 0 o N 0 t N 1 w t r r r11 N N� w c. c O des a o y- `1 N t N r UTILITIES COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes November 15, 2011— S: 00 p.m. Conference Room 1 Citv of Tukwila Utilities Committee PRESENT Councilmembers: De'Sean Quinn, Chair; Dennis Robertson and Kathy Hougardy Staff: Bob Giberson, Frank Iriarte, Robin Tischmak, Pat Brodin, Ryan Larson, Mike Cusick, David Cline, Gail Labanara and Kimberly Matej CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:02p.m. I. PRESENTATIONS No presentations. II. BUSINESS AGENDA A. Consultant Selection and Agreement: 2012 Annual Small Drainage Program, Staff is seeking approval to enter into a consultant agreement with KPG, Inc. in the amount of $64,945.76 for design services for the City's 2012 Annual Small Drainage Program. KPG was chosen from the City's consultant roster (Municipal Research and Services Center Rosters), and j has designed the Annual Small Drainage Program since 1991. Staff commented that construction of two /f 2011 Small Drainage projects were delayed, and the construction of these 2011 projects will be combined with construction of the 2012 projects. The five projects listed below have been identified for construction in 2012 through maintenance and citizen concerns: Gilliam Creek Southcenter Boulevard Street crossing Pipe repairs near the intersection of South 128` Street and 37` Avenue South Tukwila Parkway Outfall Pipe Ryan Hill Pipe repairs Fort Dent Outfall improvements Through this design services agreement, KPG, Inc. will be able to tell the City the most cost effective way to approach and construct these projects. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL.FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. B. Interlocal Contract Amendment: Cascade Water Alliance Staff is seeking Council approval to amend the current interlocal agreement with Cascade Water Alliance (CWA) which changes the calculation of administrative dues /costs from $1,000,000 or 5% of CWA's annual revenue requirement to 9 It also allows this limit to be amended by a 65% dual majority vote of the CWA Board. A dual majority requires a majority of votes according to two separate criteria in this case it refers to a vote of the members and a vote based on demand shares. As mentioned above, this amendment essentially reallocates member costs based on demand shares. Tukwila will see an increase of approximately $60,000 in annual administrative costs which is a pass through directly onto the ratepayers. The Committee requested that staff include the original administrative costs along with the new costs in the memo that goes to full Council. They also requested additional information from CWA that would explain the implications of the amendment in greater detail. It was suggested that the Committee consider reviewing CWA Board minutes when information and /or decisions pertain to Tukwila. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. 290 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS CAS NUMBER: AGENDA ITEA2 TI CATEGORY Discussion Initials Meeting Date Prepared by I I Mayor's review 11/28/11 I BG l/1/,� 12/05/11 BG� ITEM INFORMATION STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON Council review U N ITEM NO. 4.J. ORIGIN.ALAGE DA'Z'E: 11/28/11 Cascade Water Alliance Interlocal Contract Amendment Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing ❑Other Mtg Date 11128111 17tg Date 12/09111 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mfg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date SPONSOR Council Mayor HR DCD Finance Fire IT P &R Police PW SPONSOR'S Cascade Water Alliance's (CWA) forecasts anticipated the region's growth, but now with SUMMARY the economic slowdown, the revenue model needs to be updated. The equity redistribution needs to maintain member parity so costs are more stable. This contract amendment to the Interlocal shows administrative dues increasing from 5% to 9% of annual revenue requirements. For Tukwila, CWA administrative dues will increase from $69k to $126k and the overall rate model shows an increase of 9.4% in 2012. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 1 1/15/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: DE'SEAN QUINN RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONsoR /ADMIN. Public Works COMMIT TEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole. EYPENDIT'URI REQUIRED $0.00 Fund Source: 401 WATER FUND Comments: MTG. DATE 11/28/11 12/05/11 COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE AMOUNT BUDGETED $0.00 APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0.00 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION MTG.DATEI ATTACHMENTS 11/28/11 Informational Memorandum dated 11/18/11 (revised after 11/15 UC) CWA Letter to Mayor Haggerton dated 11/4/11 CWA Memo Documentation of 2012 Member Charges Amended and Restated Interlocal Contract Minutes from the Utilities Committee meetings of 11/15/11 12/05/11 1 291 292 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton UTILITIES COMMITTEE FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director q4 DATE: November 18, 2011 (Revised after 11115 Utilities Committee meeting) SUBJECT: Cascade Water Alliance Interlocal Contract Amendment ISSUE The Cascade Water Alliance Board has adopted Resolution 2011 -17 to amend the 2004 Amended and Restated Interlocal Contract. This Contract is to be further ratified by each of the member agencies. BACKGROUND The Tukwila Water Utility receives its wholesale water supply as a member of the Cascade Water Alliance (CWA). The initial Interlocal Agreement was first signed in 1999. Since then Cascade's administrative needs have changed. Members pay administrative dues based on the number of Cascade Equivalent Residential Units (CERUs) they serve. The economic slowdown in the region's growth has affected forecasts anticipated among the growth agencies. This has caused the revenue from the Regional Capital Facilities Charge (RCFC) to be materially below forecasts. In response to the overall CWA revenue model, an equity redistribution and reallocation was completed to maintain member parity so that member costs are more stable and less likely to be affected by future new water surcharges. DISCUSSION The Board of Directors of CWA which represents the 8- member agencies has unanimously voted to make changes in the Interlocal Agreement. Section 4.7 of the Amended and Restated Interlocal Contract (second paragraph) is to be amended in the following format: Each Member must pay annual dues to defray part or all of Cascade's administrative costs based on the number of CERUs served by its water system, regardless of water usage or capacity, and regardless of whether those units are served by the Supply System or by Independent Supply. Total administrative dues collected from all Members may not exceed the greater of $1,000,000 oF 5 9% of Cascade's annual revenue requirement less debt revise This limit may be amended in the budget by a 65% Dual Maioritv Vote of the Board. The Board may establish minimum annual dues per Member and may provide that less than all of the Member's CERUs be taken into account in establishing dues. From the 9% annual revenue requirement and the CERU reallocation, Tukwila's administrative dues will increase from $69,895.00 to $126,558.00, or an increase of $56,663 (Table 4, page 4, of attached Cascade memorandum). Adding some perspective, Tukwila's annual expense, including administrative dues, conservation fees, and water demand charges was $2,010,047.00 in 2011 and will be $2,198,189 in 2012 representing a 9.4% increase. RECOMMENDATION The Council is being asked to approve the Amended and Restated Interlocal Contract with Cascade Water Alliance and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular Meeting. Attachments: CWA Letter to Mayor Haggerton dated 11 -4 -11 Memo Documentation of 2012 Member Charges Amended and Restated Interlocal Contract W: \Shared Copy Only \TC -UC \Info CWA Amended Interlocal 11- 18- 11.docx 293 [P•.I November 4, 2011 SE 8` "Street Suite 4417 Be3ievue_ VVA 98004 Phone: 425.453.0930 Far.: 425.453.0953 Vvebsiie wwovcascadewate;.org 295 Jim Haggerton Mayor City of Tukwila Board of Directors 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Chair Tukwila, WA 98188 Lloyd Warren Comm =ss one- Sammamish PiateaL Dear Mayor Haggerton: Ijater Sev fer District Vice chair At its regular meeting on October 26, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Cascade John r ar Redmond r ?ayor: City of Rst,tf Water Alliance unanimous) adopted Resolution No. 2011 -17 for the u ose of y p purpose adopting an Amended and Restated Interlocal Con tract. A copy of the Board's ecretaryr`Treasurer Jinn Haggerton approval Resolution is enclosed. Ilklayor, City of Tukwila Grant Degginger Adoption of the Amended and Restated Interlocal Contract is a two -step process. Coundimcmber, City of Once adopted by a 65% Dual Majority Vote of the Board, amendments to the Bellevue Interlocal Contract must be ratified by 65 as measured by Dual Majority Vote of David Knight the Members' legislative authorities, within one hundred and twenty (120) days. er "m'S'ia "er: Cev €notch `Nate- District Cascade relied upon the amended language in establishing its 2012 Rates and p g Charges, therefore, we respectfully request that your legislative authorities ratify the °t r' r`"yer Cnuncil President, Cit o f Amended and Restated Interlocal Contract by December 31, 2011. Issaquah Penny sweet Also enclosed for presentation to, and ratification by your legislative body are two Deputy Mayor, City of originals of the Amended and Restated Interlocal Contract, dated October 26, 2011, Kirkland executed by Cascade. Once your legislative body has acted to ratify the Amended Jost Ault and Restated Interlocal Contract, please have both copies executed. Return one Cormn ssioner, Skyway W''at{ r Sevver District executed copy and the resolution or official action of your legislative body approving the agreement to Cascade. Once Cascade has received all the signature pages, which are being executed in counterparts, Cascade will send each Member a fully executed document. Chief Executive Officer There are a series of memorandum available that summarize the changes made to Chuck Clarke the Amended and Restated Interlocal Contract, as well as other actions taken by the Board on October 26, 2011, related to Cascade's Rates and Charges. If these documents would be useful in providing your legislative body with additional background on the nature of the amendments, please let me know and I will provide any additional material you require. SE 8` "Street Suite 4417 Be3ievue_ VVA 98004 Phone: 425.453.0930 Far.: 425.453.0953 Vvebsiie wwovcascadewate;.org 295 296 6� /,�`e CA S CA D E MEMORANDUM WATER ALLIANCE DATE: October 25, 2011 TO: Cascade Member Agencies FROM: Ed Cebron, Economist SUBJECT: Documentation of 2012 Member Charges A key product of Cascade's budget process is an established set of Member Charges for the upcoming year. With the adoption of a biennial budget in 2010, the rate setting process for 2012 focuses on introduction of actual 2010 data for Member customer base and demands. In addition, this summary reflects the results of structural changes in member charges based on a year -long review of member equity. The charges contained in this summary are based on Board approval of the recommended package of actions on October 26, 2011 and contingent on subsequent ratification by Member legislative bodies. The 2012 revenue increase (prior to adjustments) is set at 6.0% by prior Board action. After adjustments, the year -to -year increase in revenues is 3.2 Cascade Eauivalent Residential Units (CERUs) Discussed in the Interlocal and the RCFC Methodology, the CERU is one of the key metrics that Cascade uses to allocate costs to its Members. It is relevant in several ways: Administrative Dues are based on projected January 1�` CERU counts, and are expressed in terms of a charge per CERU. Members pay Administrative Dues based on the number of CERUs that they serve. With the package of member charge revisions, the contractual limit on administrative dues is increased from 5% of revenue requirements net of debt service to 9% of total revenue requirements. For 2012, the charge is below this limit. Conservation Charges are also based on projected January 1'` CERU counts, but have historically been discounted for Members that are not within the 15 -year supply commitment horizon. In 2008, Cascade made the policy decision to phase out this discounting by 2012. Effective with the 2012 fiscal year, all members make fully proportional payments toward conservation based on CERU counts. The 2012 Conservation Charge includes a revision to the applicable costs which derived from the member equity review. Roughly $100,000 of conservation program salaries were removed from the administrative budget and assigned to the conservation program for rate setting purposes. New Water Surcharges expire at the end of 2011, and are not a part of the 2012 member charge structure. However, reconciliation of historical years continues, with 2012 charges reflecting adjustments based on 2010 usage. This will continue in 2013, with adjustments based on 2011 actual usage. Beginning in 2014, there would be no further reconciliation adjustments related to New Water Surcharges. Demand Share Charges are initially based on a rolling three -year demand history and adjusted for CERU growth occurring between the midpoint of the three -year period and the most recent actual data available. Because Demand Share Charges account for the majority (roughly 80% to 90 of Cascade's rate revenue, the Rate Methodology explicitly establishes a Demand Share calculation that is solely based on actual historical data. Per Table 1 of the RCFC Methodology, CERU counts are based on an inventory of water meters and flow equivalency factors established by the American Water Works Association. Table 1 summarizes the calculation of CERUs based on water meter counts as of 12/31/09 and 12/31/10: 297 Table 1: CERU Calculations Water Meter Size 3/4" 1" 1 -1/2" 2 3 4" 6" 8" 10" Total Number of Meters Total Number of CERUs Water Meter Size 3/4" 1" 1 -1/2" 2 3 4" 6 8" 10" Total Number of Meters Total Number of CERUs 1.0 32,648 15,971 5,033 10,659 13,608 2.5 3,529 103 438 1.0 32,692 16,129 5,127 10,712 13,900 14,916 3,144 1,261 97,881 2.5 3,545 105 439 503 808 485 111 268 6,264 5.0 2,149 77 410 519 1,264 752 31 328 5,530 8.0 956 38 264 328 632 133 12 182 2,545 16.0 160 23 24 32 65 22 8 34 368 25.0 80 3 10 10 68 6 0 27 204 50.0 29 0 5 0 11 0 0 18 63 80.0 6 0 0 0 5 0 0 10 21 115.0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 1.0 32,648 15,971 5,033 10,659 13,608 2.5 3,529 103 438 516 804 5.0 2,129 76 404 520 1,262 8.0 945 38 262 321 631 16.0 156 18 23 30 63 25.0 77 3 8 10 68 50.0 29 0 4 0 11 80.0 6 0 0 0 5 115.0 1 0 0 0 0 345 1s'2U9 6.T L2.05!i SPW pY TukW la total 14,771 3,146 1,392 97,228 484 111 315 6,300 750 32 334 5,507 132 11 192 2,532 22 8 36 356 6 0 26 r 198 0 0 18 62 0 0 9 20 0 0 3 4 It is worth noting that the water meter and resulting CERU counts shown in Table 1 reflect several adjustments to the meter counts reported by Members on the Member Data Form. Section 2.2 of the RCFC Methodology explicitly states that fire sprinkler and exempt/deduct meters are not counted as CERUs because they do not increase system demand. Section 2.3 requires Members to report total connected CERUs to Cascade on a quarterly basis for the purpose of collecting RCFCs for this reason, meters that are not actually connected to the water system are not counted as CERUs either (they will be counted once they are connected to the system). Several Members (Redmond, Sammamish Plateau Water Sewer District, and Skyway Water Sewer District) reported some combined domestic /fire meters. These meters are generally 1 -inch meters that were oversized from 3/4 -inch meters to provide fire flow capacity —these meters are included in Table 1 as 3/4 -inch meters and assigned 1 CERU per meter. Because the City of Kirkland does not impose charges on irrigation (sprinkler) meters based on meter size, it has a limited amount of data available regarding the size of its irrigation meters. It was able to develop an approximate breakdown by size for 12/31/09 based on a sampling of its irrigation meters Table 1 uses the same proportionality to estimate a breakdown for 12/31/10. 3/4" 230 232 1" 62 63 1 -1/2" 78 79 2" 76 77 Table 2 summarizes the CERU growth projections assumed for 2012: 2 M•: Table 2: CERU Proiections by Member Total The distribution of estimated 2012 growth between Members is broadly based on year -to -date growth through 9 months of 2011, extrapolated to a full year projection. In addition: The CERU count at the beginning of 2012 reflects a shift of 196 CERUs from Redmond to Kirkland resulting from an annexation of the Kingsgate area effective June 1, 2011. Sammamish Plateau has a request in process to serve the Overdale service area, which contains 153 homes. It is assumed that this service is formally accepted for the 2012 service year. These are added to the District's total CERUs. Administrative Dues Administrative Dues are imposed on Members to recover the various administrative costs that Cascade incurs in its day to -day operations examples of relevant expenses include salaries and benefits of administrative personnel, office space rental, and public process. Members pay Administrative Dues annually, according to the number of Cascade Equivalent Residential Units (CERUs) that they serve and the prevailing Administrative Dues rate per CERU. The Administrative Dues rate is generally derived for a given year by dividing that year's projected administrative expenses by the number of CERUs at the end of the prior year (for example, the 2012 Administrative Dues rate is based on the projected 2011 year -end CERU count, which is assumed to be the same as the CERU count as of January 1, 2012). Cascade policy imposes constraints on the amount that Cascade can collect in Administrative Dues annual collections are limited to nine percent of the Member Charge revenue requirement. Given these requirements, Table 3 shows the derivation of the 2012 Administrative Dues rates: Table 3: Derivation of 2012 Administrative Dues AdministMtive Dues Rate Calcula Projected Administrative Expenses: CERU Growth Forecast MGM r amm 930,791 Bellevue 66,553 187 0 66,739 Covington WD 17,524 197 0 17,720 Issaquah 11,271 158 0 11,429 Kirkland 17,951 57 196 18,204 Redmond 30,986 318 (196) 31,108 Sammamish Plateau WSD 21,455 205 153 21,813 Skyway WSD 3,801 6 0 3,807 Tukwila 8,291 3 0 8,294 Total The distribution of estimated 2012 growth between Members is broadly based on year -to -date growth through 9 months of 2011, extrapolated to a full year projection. In addition: The CERU count at the beginning of 2012 reflects a shift of 196 CERUs from Redmond to Kirkland resulting from an annexation of the Kingsgate area effective June 1, 2011. Sammamish Plateau has a request in process to serve the Overdale service area, which contains 153 homes. It is assumed that this service is formally accepted for the 2012 service year. These are added to the District's total CERUs. Administrative Dues Administrative Dues are imposed on Members to recover the various administrative costs that Cascade incurs in its day to -day operations examples of relevant expenses include salaries and benefits of administrative personnel, office space rental, and public process. Members pay Administrative Dues annually, according to the number of Cascade Equivalent Residential Units (CERUs) that they serve and the prevailing Administrative Dues rate per CERU. The Administrative Dues rate is generally derived for a given year by dividing that year's projected administrative expenses by the number of CERUs at the end of the prior year (for example, the 2012 Administrative Dues rate is based on the projected 2011 year -end CERU count, which is assumed to be the same as the CERU count as of January 1, 2012). Cascade policy imposes constraints on the amount that Cascade can collect in Administrative Dues annual collections are limited to nine percent of the Member Charge revenue requirement. Given these requirements, Table 3 shows the derivation of the 2012 Administrative Dues rates: Table 3: Derivation of 2012 Administrative Dues AdministMtive Dues Rate Calcula Projected Administrative Expenses: Salaries Benefits 1,001,204 930,791 Professional Services 659,500 647,500 Communications Intergovernmental 727,000 617,000 Office Rent 124,000 126,000 Other Administrative Expenses 219,900 211,900 Operating Budget Contingency 200,000 200,000 Total 2,931,604 2,733,191 Administrative Dues Revenue Cap 1,444,763 2,915,663 Projected CERU Count as of January 1 177,829 179,113 Administrative Cost per CERU 16.49 15.26 Administrative Dues Rate per CERU The administrative expenses shown reflect a re- assignment of labor costs related to the conservation program out of the administrative budget, estimated at $100,000. Table 4 shows the projected 2012 Administrative Dues payment for each Member: 299 Table 4: Proiected 2012 Administrative Dues Pavments by Member Administ Dues T Fig Bellevue Covington WD Issaquah Kirkland Redmond Sammamish Plateau WSD Skyway WSD Tukwila Total Conservation Charges 539,117 140,921 90,583 146,818 251,439 17S,041 30,949 69,895 1,018,414 270,403 174,395 277,784 474,696 332,855 58,086 126,558 Conservation Charges were introduced in 2005 as a means of recovering the costs of Cascade's conservation program. Like Administrative Dues, Conservation Charges are imposed on Members on a CERU basis. Table 5 shows the derivation of the Conservation Charge for 2012: Table 5: Derivation of 2012 Conservation Charges Conserva Char Ra Calc ulation Projected Conservation Expenses: Bellevue Salaries Benefits 116,645 220,145 Rebates 825,000 825,000 Fixture Replacement Supplies 90,000 90,000 Audits 30,000 30,000 Communications Public Information 175,000 175,000 Other 46,000 46,000 Total 1,282,645 1,386,145 Applicable Number of CERUs 177,829 179,113 Conservation Charge per CERU The 2012 conservation expenses reflect the addition of related conservation program labor that had been previously budgeted under administrative expense. Given the proposed Conservation Charge rates discussed above, Table 6 shows the projected 2012 payments for each Member: Table 6: Proiected 2012 Conservation Charge Pavments by Member QQnservation Charms Bellevue 482,150 516,491 Covington WD 116,578 137,136 Issaquah 81,011 88,445 Kirkland 131,304 140,879 Redmond 224,870 240,743 Sammamish Plateau WSD 156,545 168,809 Skyway WSD 27,679 29,458 Tukwila 62,510 64,184 Total difference in total due to rounding New Water Surcharges The New Water Surcharge expires on December 31, 2011 and does not apply for 2012. However, there remains a reconciliation adjustment in 2012 and 2013 for all members subject to the New Water Surcharge. The calculation of New Water Surcharges for a given budget cycle requires an estimate of wholesale water demand for that year Cascade must reconcile each Member's payments when their actual demand data is available. There is 4 1 1� generally a two -year lag in this reconciliation. For example, actual 2010 demands were not available until a few months into 2011- the information is available in time for the 2012 Budget, two years after the 2010 New Water Surcharges were actually paid. Table 7 reconciles the 2010 New Water Surcharges: Total 1 11,928,186 1,882,964 1,412,223 2,695,978 (1,283,756) For 2010, actual demands for Kirkland and Redmond had been adjusted to reflect the transfer of 52 customers in the Bridle Trails area from Redmond to Kirkland, shifting 5,204 ccf of demand from Redmond to Kirkland. For this reconciliation, the related data revision was reversed to reconcile actual usage to the appropriate agency. Demand Share Charges The Demand Share Charge recovers costs that are not otherwise recovered through the other Member Charges or other sources of revenue, and is computed by dividing the Demand Share cost basis by the number of Demand Shares. A member's Demand Share in a given year is based on a three -year rolling average -the 2012 calculations are based on data from 2008 -2010, since 2012 rates are determined in 2011. Each member's Demand Share is initially established as the greater of: Average daily demand (in mgd) from Cascade during the peak season (June September) Average daily demand (in mgd) from Cascade for the entire calendar year To account for the lag factor from using a three -year rolling average, this basis is adjusted to reflect relative growth in customer bases. Based on CERU counts, each Member's adjustment is computed from the midpoint of the three -year period to the most recent data available. The 2012 adjustment can be expressed as follows: Midpoint Adjustment 2011 CERU Count (CERUs as of 12/31/10) 2009 CERU Count (CERUs as of 12/31/08) The Demand Share is calculated by multiplying the Demand Share basis defined above by the midpoint adjustment. Table 8 summarizes the 2012 Demand Share calculations (more detailed calculations are attached as an appendix): Table 8:2012 Demand Share Calculations Bellevue Covington WD Issaquah Kirkland Redmond Sammamish Plateau WSD Skyway WSD Tukwila Table 7: Reconciliation of 2010 New Water Surchames 5.1984 14.3% 6.5158 17.9% 20.3121 54.6% 0.0000 New Water 0 New 5.3359 20 New .w Water Surcharge Water Actual 2010 Actual New Surcharge Water Charges Water Surcharge Impo Bellevue 6,339,344 6,727,553 388,209 291,157 1,080,684 (789,528) Issaquah 282,165 282,165 211,624 276,969 (65,345) Kirkland 1,467,881 1,679,781 211,900 158,925 329,507 (170,582) Redmond 1,152,275 1,901,747 749,472 562,104 867,808 (305,704) SPWSD 251,217 251,217 188,413 141,010 47,403 Skyway WSD 349,165 165,794 Tukwila 1,375,836 919,928 Total 1 11,928,186 1,882,964 1,412,223 2,695,978 (1,283,756) For 2010, actual demands for Kirkland and Redmond had been adjusted to reflect the transfer of 52 customers in the Bridle Trails area from Redmond to Kirkland, shifting 5,204 ccf of demand from Redmond to Kirkland. For this reconciliation, the related data revision was reversed to reconcile actual usage to the appropriate agency. Demand Share Charges The Demand Share Charge recovers costs that are not otherwise recovered through the other Member Charges or other sources of revenue, and is computed by dividing the Demand Share cost basis by the number of Demand Shares. A member's Demand Share in a given year is based on a three -year rolling average -the 2012 calculations are based on data from 2008 -2010, since 2012 rates are determined in 2011. Each member's Demand Share is initially established as the greater of: Average daily demand (in mgd) from Cascade during the peak season (June September) Average daily demand (in mgd) from Cascade for the entire calendar year To account for the lag factor from using a three -year rolling average, this basis is adjusted to reflect relative growth in customer bases. Based on CERU counts, each Member's adjustment is computed from the midpoint of the three -year period to the most recent data available. The 2012 adjustment can be expressed as follows: Midpoint Adjustment 2011 CERU Count (CERUs as of 12/31/10) 2009 CERU Count (CERUs as of 12/31/08) The Demand Share is calculated by multiplying the Demand Share basis defined above by the midpoint adjustment. Table 8 summarizes the 2012 Demand Share calculations (more detailed calculations are attached as an appendix): Table 8:2012 Demand Share Calculations Bellevue Covington WD Issaquah Kirkland Redmond Sammamish Plateau WSD Skyway WSD Tukwila 2012 Sh re o #T�rat 19.7 900 0.0000 1 0.0% 0.9412 2.6% 5.1984 14.3% 6.5158 17.9% 20.3121 54.6% 0.0000 0.0% 1.0359 2.8% 5.3359 14.4% 6.9109 18.6% 0.4232 1.1% 0.4260 1.1% 2.7244 7.3% 2012 Sh re o #T�rat 19.7 900 0.0000 1 0.0% 0.9412 2.6% 5.1984 14.3% 6.5158 17.9% 1.0000 I 2.7% 1 0.4010 I 1.1% 2.5865 7.1% Wli. The Demand Share calculation summarized in Table 8 incorporates the transfer of 248 CERUs from Redmond to Kirkland through two annexations (52 CERUs from the Bridle View area and 196 CERUs from the Kingsgate area). For the purpose of computing 2012 Demand Shares, both the historical demands and CERU counts are adjusted to reflect the transfer. 301 Historical demands are adjusted using Cascade's standard CERU demand assumptions (241 gpd of average day demand; 371 gpd of peak season demand). For Issaquah and Sammamish Plateau, minimum demand shares of 0.75 and 1.00, respectively, have been set by Board action, and the above table reflects these minimums when applicable, while the appendix also illustrates calculated demand shares based on historical usage. Table 9 shows the Demand Share Charge calculation for 2012: Table 9: Derivation of 2012 Demand Share Charge Dem and Share Charge Calculation Total Prior -Year Member Charge Revenue Excluding RCFCs $28,832,552 $30,562,505 Planned Member Charge Revenue Adjustment 6.00% 6.00% Projected Member Charge Revenue $30,562,505 $32,396,255 Less: Projected Administrative Dues 1,444,763 2,733,191 Less: Projected Conservation Charges 1,282,645 1,386,145 Less: Projected New Water Surcharges 2,220,211 0 Demand Share Cost Basis $25,614,886 $28,276,919 Projected Demand Share Basis 37.1662 36.4329 Demand Share Charge Corresponding Charge Per Demand Share Table 10 shows the Demand Share Charge payments for each Member. Table 10: 2012 Demand Share Charees By Member Demand Share Charts Bellevue Covington WD Issaquah Kirkland Redmond Sammamish Plateau WSD Skyway WSD Tukwila Total Existing 2011 2012 JLT6 t51; T I.Pa went 13,999,098 713,913 3,711,447 4,727,490 291,661 293,634 1,877,642 Table 11 summarizes the 2012 Member Charges for each Member: 15, 359, 764 730,481 4,034,694 5,057,142 776,136 311,256 2,007,447 Table 11: Summary of 2012 Member Charges ICovin¢ ton Water District I 140,921 1 5 116.578 1 5 1 1 5 257,499 1lssaquah 1 90,583 1 81,011 1 S 277,324 1$ 713.913 1 5 1.162,831 1 1Kirkland 1$ 146,818 1$ 131,304 1 S 323,218 1 S 3.711,447 1 5 4.312,787 1Redmond 1 251,439 1 224,870 1 710,794 1 4,727,490 1 5 5,914,593 ISammamish Plateau WSD 1 175,041 1 156,545 1 190,323 1 S 291.661 1 5 813,570 Skyway Water Sewer I 30,949 27,679 I 293,634 I 352,262 District Tukwila 69,895 1 62,510 1 I 1,877,642 1 2,010,047 0. I Bellevue 1Covington Water District Ilssaquah 1Kirkland IRedmond ISammamish Plateau WSD Skyway Water Sewer District I$ 1,018.414'5 1 S 270.403 1 5 1 174.395' I 277,784 1 1 474.696 1 332.855 1 58,086 516,491 I 137,136 1 88,445 1 140,879 I 240,743 1 168,809 1 29,458 I 1 $15.359,764 I $16,894,670 I 1 5 1 407,539 1 1 730.481 1 S 993,320 1 1 4,034,694 I 4,453,356 1 S 5.057,142 1 5,772,581 1 1 S 776.136 1 1,277,800 1 PJ 7.3% 58.3% -14.6% 3.3% -2.4% 57.1% Member Total With Charge justments (200,084)l $15,538,833 1$ 1 5 257,499 1 1 66.895 1 5 1,229,726 1 1 5 (3,552)1 5 4.309,235 1 1 (59,294)1 5,855,299 1 1 (213,854)1 599,716 1 I 352,262 2,010,047 Member Total With Increase Charge Adjustments 2011 Over Charges Adjustments (789,528)1 $16,105,142 1 3.6% 1 1 407,539 1 58.3% 1 1 (65,345)1 927,974 1 -24.5% 1 1 (170,582)1 4,282,775 1 -0.6% 1 1 (305,704)1 5,466,877 1 -6.6% 1 1 47,403 1 1,325,203 I 121.0% 1 I 398,800 13.2% 2,198,189 9.4% 302 0)Cil R'a 0)" R'd O1 (N N 00 N l0 N O M O (7) m oq O n O w D a/ O 0 1, of 00 00 0 w O N VI N E N N C N N m N O 0 a) l R w n O Ql O Q Ln 0 r O O 7 m E m x m 75 m n 2' N O N O U V m m o n oo m Ln m C V O V1 L D Ql Ol Ol cn r-4 wo •--I N oo N VI Ln N M W ID Q1 iD O n 00 a0 N ul O oo oo O 4 00 N Il (7) m O ao O n oo ri a/ O ai N N of C c 00 N O N VI N E N N a 0 L Ln N Q O O v a) l R n O f0 Ql 7 C C O O N 0 I� L oo E y to 7 E E x O 75 m n 2' N O N O U V m m �o oo m m ui 0 m V oo L ca oo m o v O N 01 m r i O V A\ N M m N c1 v Q> n 0 c Q) C O O C O Q a E (n U v o to 3 in E E E r LL ll ll N VI Ln N M W ID Q1 iD O n 00 a0 N ul O oo oo O 4 E m E m m a/ O Q N N C c O O N VI N E N N a 0 L 0• 3 Q N E U U DD f0 y 7 C C O Q L Q U U U 0 3 L o N— E y p w w m U U— 7 E E x O o C Q m n 2' N O N O U r- 303 After recording, ret to: GordonDerr LLP 2025 First Avenue, Suite 500 Seattle, Washington 98121 (206) 382 -9540 WASHINGTON STATE RECORDER'S Cover Sheet (RCW 65.04) 1 DOCUMENT TITLES) (or transactions contained therein): INTERLOCAL CONTRACT REFERENCE NUMBER(S) OF DOCUMENTS ASSIGNED OR RELEASED: N/A Additional reference #s on page of document(s) GRANTOR(S) (Last name first, then first name and initials) Cascade Water Alliance/Members of Cascade Water Alliance Additional names on page of document GRANTEE(S) (Last name first, then first name and initials) Cascade Water Alliance/Members of Cascade Water Alliance Additional names on page of document LEGAL DESCRIPTION (abbreviated: i.e., lot, block, plat or section, township, range) N/A Additional legal is on page of document ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL /ACCOUNT NUMBER N/A Asse ssor Tax no ey t as 304 INTERLOCAL CONTRACT Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 Cascade Interlocal Contract i Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 305 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE1. AGREEMENT ..............................1 ARTICLE2. DEFINITIONS ..............................1 ARTICLE 3. FORMATION OF ENTITY; PURPOSE AND POWERS 7 Section3.1 Formation ..............................7 Section3.2 Membership 7 Section 3.3 Conversion to Municipal Corporation Status ..............................9 Section3.4 Purposes ..............................9 Section3.5 Powers .............................10 ARTICLE 4. ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE; BOARD .............................11 Section 4.1 Composition, ByLaws and Meetings .............................11 Section 4.2 Powers of the Board .............................12 Section4.3 Voting .............................12 Section 4.4 Officers and Committees .............................12 Section 4.5 Executive Committee .............................13 Section 4.6 Staff, Consultants and Contractors .............................14 Section 4.7 Budget; Dues; Financial Management .............................14 ARTICLE 5. ASSET DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPLY COMMITMENT .............................15 Section 5.1 Property Acquisition, Ownership and Disposition .............................15 Section5.2 Supply Commitment .............................16 Section 5.2.1 Commitment to Members .............................16 Section 5.2.2 Additional Rules for Members Retaining Independent Supply .....................18 Section 5.2.3 Additional Rules for Source Exchange .............................19 Section5.3 Financing of Assets 20 Section5.3.1 Issuance of Bonds .............................20 Section 5.3.2 Pledge of Revenues 21 Section 5.33 Continuing Discl osure .............................23 Section 5.3.4 Preservation of Tax Exemption for Interest on the Bonds .............................23 Cascade Interlocal Contract Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 OR Section 5.3.5 Additional Certificates 23 Section 5.4 Supply Expansions and System Extensions .............................23 Section 5.5 Regional Capital Facilities Charges 24 Section 5.6 Transfer Upon Mergers, Consolidations and Assumptions 26 ARTICLE 6. NEW INDEPENDENT SUPPLY 27 ARTICLE7. ASSET MANAGEMENT .............................27 Section 7.1 Supply System Management .............................28 Section7.2 Conservation Section 7.3 Shortages and Emergency .............................29 Section7.3.1 Shortages 29 Section7.3.2. Emergency Section7.4 Water Quality .............................30 Section 7.5 Water Supply Rates and Charges 31 Section 7.6 New Water Surcharge .............................3 Section 7.7 Franchises and Easements 33 Section 7.8 Sales of Water to Non Members .............................33 Section 7.9 Payment Procedures; Default; Step -Up Provisions 34 Section 7.9.1 Invoice and Payment 34 Section7.9.2 Default and Step- Up 35 ARTICLE8. PLANNING .............................36 Section8.1 Water Supply Plan 36 Section 8.2 Watershed Management Plan 37 Section 8.3 System Reliability Methodology .............................37 ARTICLE9. FILINGS .............................37 ARTICLE 10. DURATION AND DISSOLUTION; WITHDRAWAL 37 Section10.1 Duration 38 Section10.2 Withdrawals .............................38 Section10.3 Dissolution 40 Section10.4 Successor Entity 40 ARTICLE11. AMENDMENTS 41 ARTICLE 12. APPLICABLE LAW AND VENUE .............................41 Cascade Interlocal Contract Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 307 ARTICLE 13. NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES 41 ARTICLE14. SEVERABIL TTY 41 ARTICLE15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT 42 ARTICLE16. EXECUTION .............................44 Cascade Interlocal Contract iv Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 1: CASCADE WATER ALLIANCE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT Recitals WHEREAS, the Cascade Water Alliance, an intergovernmental organization created by Interlocal Contract effective April 1, 1999 (as amended July 2000 and November 2002) to further the interests of its Members with respect to water supply and to work cooperatively with other water supply entities in the region; and WHEREAS, Members of the Cascade Water Alliance have determined to amend the Cascade Water Alliance's Interlocal Contract to better facilitate the purpose of the Cascade Water Alliance; NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: .ARTICLE 1. Agreement The Cascade Interlocal Contract, effective April 1, 1999, and entered into under authority of the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 39.34 RCW is amended and re- stated as provided herein. ARTICLE 2. Definitions "Asset Transfer Agreement" means an agreement between Cascade and a Member by which the Member transfers title to Water Supply Assets to Cascade, with or without monetary consideration, to be operated and maintained as part of the Cascade Water System. "Authorized Issuer" means either: (a) Cascade (or a successor entity); or (b) a Member or other entity authorized to issue Bonds for the benefit of Cascade approved by Resolution of the Board. "Board" means the Board of Directors of Cascade. Cascade Interlocal Contract 1 Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 309 "Bonds" means short-term or long -term bonds, notes, warrants, certificates of indebtedness, or other obligations issued by, or on behalf of Cascade. "ByLaws" means the ByLaws of Cascade, as adopted and amended by the Board. "Cascade" means Cascade Water Alliance. "Cascade ERUs" "CERUs means equivalent residential units, calculated according to the Regional Capital Facilities Charge Methodology. "Cascade Source Exchange Program" means a program adopted by Resolution of the Board for the replacement of all or a portion of a public water systems existing water supply to benefit stream flow and fish without serving growth or increasing that system's water supply. A program utilizing Lake Tapps Water Supply shall include the terms and conditions for source exchange contained in the Lake Tapps' Water Right Report of Examination. "Cascade Source Exchange Program Agreement" means an agreement between Cascade and a Member or another public water supplier to implement the Cascade Source Exchange Program. "Cascade Supply Date" means the date for the Founding Members and each new Member, established by Resolution of the Board, upon which Cascade undertakes a Supply Commitment. "Contract" means this Cascade Water Alliance Interlocal Contract. "Demand Share" means either a Member's current share of water provided through the Supply System, or estimated share of water to be provided through the Supply System, Cascade Interlocal Contract -2- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 310 whether Full Supply or Interruptible Supply, expressed in millions of gallons per day. Demand Share is calculated according to the Rate Calculation Methodology. "Dual Majority Vote" means Board approval of a proposal on the basis of a simple majority of all Members, allowing one vote per Member, together with a simple majority of all Members on the basis of each Member's Weighted Vote. A "simple majority" means a majority of all Members of Cascade, not just the Members present and voting. 11 65% Dual Majority Vote" means Board approval of a proposal on the basis of a 65% supermajority of all Members, allowing one vote per Member, together with 65% supermajority of all Members on the basis of each Member's Weighted Vote. A supermajority" means 65% of all Members of Cascade, not just the Members present and voting. "Founding Member" means the City of Bellevue, Covington Water District, the City of Issaquah, the City of Kirkland, the City of Redmond, Sammamish Plateau Water and Sewer District, Skyway Water and Sewer District, and the City of Tukwila. "Gross Cascade Revenue" means all of the earnings and revenues received by Cascade from any source whatsoever including but not limited to: (a) Member Charges; (b) revenues from the sale, lease or furnishing of other commodities, services, properties or facilities; (c) the receipt of earnings from the investment of money in any maintenance fund or similar fund; (d) and withdrawals from any rate reserve or rate stabilization fund or account. However, Gross Cascade Revenue shall not include: (a) principal proceeds of Bonds or any other borrowings, or earnings or proceeds from any investments in a trust, defeasance or escrow fund created to defease or refund obligations relating to the Water Supply System Cascade interlocal Contract -3- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 311 (until commingled with other earnings and revenues included in Gross Cascade Revenue) or held in a special account for the purpose of paying a rebate to the United States Government under the Code; (b) taxes and other income and revenue which may not legally be pledged for revenue bond debt service; (c) improvement district assessments; (d) federal or state grants allocated to capital projects; (e) payments under Bond Insurance or other credit enhancement policy or device; (f) insurance or condemnation proceeds used for the replacement of capital projects or equipment; (g) earnings in any construction fund or bond redemption fund; (h) deposits to any rate reserve or rate stabilization fund or account; or (i) any revenues generated by any Independent Supply except those amounts that are payable to Cascade pursuant to this Contract or another interlocal agreement. "Independent Supply" or "Independent Supplies" means a Member's Water Supply Assets that are not part of the Supply System. "Member" or "Members" means one or more member agencies of Cascade. "Member Charges" means all payments that Cascade Members are required by this Contract to make to Cascade, including but not limited to all Rates and Charges, RCFCs, dues, assessments and other payments from Members. "Net Cascade Revenue" means Gross Cascade Revenue less Operations and Maintenance Costs. "Non- Member" means any person or agency that is not a party to this Contract. "Operations and Maintenance Costs" or "O &M Costs" means all expenses incurred by Cascade to operate and maintain the Supply System in good repair, working order and condition, including without limitation, payments made to any other public or private Cascade Interlocal Contract -4- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 312 entity for water or other utility service. Except as approved by the Board, Operations and Maintenance Costs shall not include any depreciation, capital additions or capital replacements to the Supply System. "Rates and Charges" means the rates and charges (not including RCFCs) chargeable to each Member using the Rate Calculation Methodology plus any late payment or other charge that may be due. "Rate Calculation Methodology" means the method of setting Rates and Charges adopted by the Board in accordance with Section 7.5 "Regional Capital Facilities Charges" "RCFCs means the charges to each Member for new CERUs connected to that Member's water distribution system. "Regional Capital Facilities Charge Methodology" "RCFC Methodology means the method of determining the RCFCs adopted by the Board in accordance with Section 5.5. "Satellite Systems" means water supply facilities identified as such by the Board, including but not limited to facilities that serve a portion of a Member's customers but that are not part of the Member's main water system. "Seattle Contract Purveyor" or "Seattle Contract Purveyors" -means a Member that is or was a party to The City of Seattle Water Purveyor Contracts, Version A or Version B, dated November 1981 (as amended) executed prior to July 1, 1998. "Supply Commitment" means the obligation undertaken by Cascade, established by Resolution of the Board to supply water to a Member. With respect to Members, that Cascade Interlocal Contract -5- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 313 obligation shall be characterized as "Full Supply Commitment," or an "Interruptible Supply Commitment" defined as follows: "Full Supply Commitment" for any or all of a Member's water needs means that those needs, as projected in the Member's lawfully adopted water supply plan, shall be met from the Supply System, net of independent supply and subject to the other limitations established in this agreement, on an equal parity with all other Full Supply Commitments, and with a guaranteed priority no lower than for any other Supply Commitment made by Cascade; provided that no Member is guaranteed any given amount of supply or capacity. "Interruptible Supply Commitment" means a supply of all or part of a Member's water needs from the Supply System on an as- available basis on a lower priority than any Full Supply Commitment. The Supply Commitment for a Member shall be defined by this Interlocal Contract, the terms and conditions of membership, and the Supply Commitment resolution. "Supply System" means the Water Supply Assets owned or controlled by Cascade. "Water Supply Assets" means tangible and intangible assets usable in connection with the provision of water supply, including without limitation, real property, physical facilities (e.g., dams, wells, treatment plants, pump stations, reservoirs, and transmission lines), water rights, capacity and/or contractual rights in facilities or resources owned by other entities, and investments in conservation programs and facilities. "Watershed Management Plan" means a plan adopted by Cascade for purposes of regional water supply, water transmission, water quality or protection, or any other water- related purpose, including but not limited to the plans identified in RCW 39.34.190(3). Cascade Interlocal Contract -6- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 314 "Water Supply Plan" means the Cascade Regional Water Supply Plan (which may include the Cascade Watershed Management Plan) adopted by the Board as provided in Section 8.1 and 8.2. "Weighted Vote" means a vote in which each Member's vote is counted according to the Member's Demand Share, but no Member shall have a Weighted Vote of less than one. ARTICLE 3. Formation of Entity; Purpose and Powers Section 3.1 Formation. The Cascade Water Alliance was created on April 1, 1999 as a public body and an instrumentality of its Members, which exercises essential governmental functions on its Members' behalf as authorized by the Interlocal Cooperation Act (RCW 39.34). Cascade is incorporated under RCW 39.34.040(3) as a public nonprofit corporation in the manner set forth in RCW 24.03 or 24.06 and it may, with Board approval, be incorporated as a partnership in the manner set forth in RCW 25.04, or the Board may organize the form of Cascade in any other manner permitted by law. In addition to its status under any other applicable law, Cascade shall constitute a "watershed management partnership" as provided in Chapter 39.34 RCW. The Board may approve the filing of Articles of Incorporation or similar documents in connection with incorporating Cascade or organizing it in some other manner. Section 3.2 Membership. Subject to restrictions on future Cascade water rights, or to limitations upon water's place of use imposed by contract or permit, any municipal water utility serving within the Central Puget Sound Region may be admitted to Cascade. The decision to admit new Members rests with the sole discretion of the Board, which shall Cascade Interlocal Contract -7- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 315 determine whether to extend a membership offer taking into consideration the audit findings, Cascade water resources, and any other factors the Board deems advisable. When a municipality applies for membership, Cascade shall conduct a water supply audit according to the methodology and within the period determined by the Board. Audit results shall be provided to the Board and to the applicant. If a membership offer is extended, it shall address the nature of the Water Supply Assets being transferred or retained and the "value" of those assets in terms of the calculation of an applicant's Demand Share, RCFCs and other matters relating to the rights and obligations of the applicant and Cascade, which must be recorded in the form that the Board determines and which will constitute, along with this Contract, the conditions under which an applicant becomes a Member of Cascade. An applicant for membership shall be admitted by adoption of a Resolution of the Board accepting the application for membership and incorporating the terms and conditions of membership. Each membership application must be accompanied by a nonrefundable application fee based on the cost of the audit and other costs related to the admission of a new Member or a request for new supply. The Board shall set the application fee for each applicant based on the estimated cost of processing the application, including the cost of the audit. As a condition of membership, each new Member admitted to Cascade shall, in addition to any other applicable fees, rates, charges or assessments, pay to Cascade the membership fee, as established by the Board. Cascade Interlocal Contract -8- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 316 If an applicant's planning process or plans are materially out of compliance with the requirements of the Growth Management Act, the Board may condition an offer of membership upon the applicant's compliance with that act. Section 3.3 Conversion to Municipal Corporation Status. In accordance with Section 10.4, Cascade may be converted into a separate municipal corporation if, and as permitted by law. Upon the creation of such a separate municipal corporation, all Cascade rights and obligations and all Member rights an obligations under this Contract shall transfer to that new municipal corporation. Section 3.4 Purposes. Cascade's purposes include only those related to water resources, and do not include the provision of other general services to the public, and are to: a. provide a safe, reliable and high quality drinking water supply to meet the current and projected demands of Cascade Members serving the Central Puget Sound Region, and for non Members as determined by Cascade, and to carry out this task in a coordinated, cost effective, and environmentally sensitive manner; b. develop, contract for, manage, acquire, own, maintain and operate Water Supply Assets, including without limitation, surface water supplies, groundwater supplies, reclaimed water supplies, and other water supply resources as determined by the Board; c. contract with Seattle to transfer to Cascade and to modify Seattle's rights and duties with respect to Seattle Contract Purveyors; d. contract for, or assume certain contractual rights and duties related to the Tacoma Second Supply Pipeline project; e. purchase and provide water supply, transmission services, treatment facilities and other related services; f. provide conservation programs to promote the wise and efficient use of resources; g. carry out emergency water supply and shortage management programs for its Members when demands exceed available supply; Cascade Interlocal Contract -9- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 317 I coordinate and plan cooperatively with other regional or local water utilities and other entities to maximize supply availability and to minimize system costs; develop a Water Supply Plan addressing the needs of its Members and develop a Watershed Management Plan serving the needs of its Members and Cascade itself and develop a regional water supply plan with other water providers as Cascade may find convenient or necessary to meet regional, state and federal planning requirements, and to take a leadership role in developing and coordinating those supply plans; j. share costs and risks among Members commensurate with benefits received; and k. carry out, or to further other water supply purposes that the Members determine, consistent with the provisions of this Contract. Section 3.5 Powers. To further its purposes, Cascade has the full power and authority to exercise all powers authorized or permitted under RCW 39.34 and any other laws that are now, or in the future may be, applicable or available to Cascade and to engage in all activities incidental or conducive to the attainment of the purposes set forth in Section 3.4 of this Contract, including but not limited to the authority to: a. acquire, construct, receive, own, manage, lease and sell real property, personal property, intangible property and other Water Supply Assets; b. operate and maintain facilities; c. enter into contracts; d. hire and fire personnel; e. sue and be sued; f. exercise the power or eminent domain (through its Members at their individual discretion, unless and until Cascade has that power under applicable law); g. impose, alter, regulate, control and collect rates, charges, and assessments, h. purchase and sell water and services within and outside the geographical boundaries of its Members; Cascade Interlocal Contract -10- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 i. borrow money (through its Members or other entities at their individual discretion or as authorized by Chapter 39.34 RCW now or in the future), or enter into other financing arrangements; J. lend money or provide services or facilities to any Member, other governmental water utilities, or governmental service providers; k. invest its funds; 1. establish policies, guidelines, or regulations to carry out its powers and responsibilities; m. purchase insurance, including participation in pooled insurance and self insurance programs, and indemnify its Members, officers and employees in accordance with law; n. exercise all other powers within the authority of, and that may be exercised individually by all of its Members with respect to water supply, conservation, reuse, treatment and transmission, or any of the other purposes set forth in Section 3.4; o. exercise all other powers within the authority of, and that may be exercised individually by all its Members with respect to watershed planning and management; and p. exercise all other corporate powers that Cascade may exercise under the law relating to its formation and that are not inconsistent with this Interlocal Contract or with Chapter 39.34 RCW or other applicable law. ARTICLE 4. Organization Structure; Board Section 4.1 Composition, ByLaws and Meetings. Cascade is governed by a Board of Directors consisting of one individual representative appointed by Resolution of the Member's legislative authority. Members may similarly appoint Alternate Board Members. Each Board Member and each Alternate Board Member must be an elected official of the Member. Cascade Interlocal Contract Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 319 The Board shall adopt ByLaws consistent with this Interlocal Contract that specify, among other matters, the month of Cascade's Annual Meeting, Board powers and duties and those of the Executive Committee, Standing Committees, Officers and employees. The Board shall meet as required by the ByLaws, but not less than quarterly. Section 4.2 Powers of the Board. The Board has the power to take all actions on Cascade's behalf in accordance with voting provisions set forth in Section 4.3. The Board may delegate to the Executive Committee or to specific Cascade Officers or employees any action that does not require Board approval under this Contract. Section 4.3 Voting. All Board actions must be approved by Dual Majority Vote of all Members, except where this Contract requires either a 65% Dual Majority Vote, as provided in Sections 5.2, 5.5, 7.1, 7.3, 8.3, 10.3, 10.4, and Article 11; or ratification by the Members' legislative authority, as provided in Section 10.4 and Article 11. The Board may act by voice votes, as set forth in the ByLaws. Any Member may require a recorded tabulation of votes either before or immediately after a voice vote is taken. Although voting is, in part, based on Weighted Vote, the Members expressly agree that there is only one class of voting membership, and voting occurs within that single class. Any Member that has been declared to be in default of its obligations under this lnterlocal Contract by the Board shall lose its right to vote until the Board has declared the default to be cured. Section 4.4 Officers and Committees. Cascade Officers shall include a Chair, a Vice Chair, a Secretary and a Treasurer. The Chair serves as the chair of the Board (and may Cascade interlocal Contract -12- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 320 be known as the "President if the ByLaws so designate) and performs those duties set forth in the ByLaws. The Vice Chair shall perform the duties of the Chair in the Chair's absence and shall perform other duties as set forth in the ByLaws. The Secretary shall be responsible for Cascade records and performs other duties as set forth in the ByLaws. The Treasurer shall be responsible for Cascade accounts and financial records and performs other duties as set forth in the ByLaws. Consistent with the provisions of this Contract, the Board may, in the ByLaws, establish additional Officers and set forth their duties. The Board may create and appoint Members to Standing Committees and special committees as it deems appropriate. Committee Members need not be elected officials or employees of Members, but Standing Committee Chairs must be Board Members or Alternate Board Members. Section 4.5 Executive Committee. The Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary, Treasurer and chairpersons of Standing Committees together constitute Cascade's Executive Committee. The Chair (or acting Chair) shall vote on matters before the Executive Committee only if necessary to break a tie. The Executive Committee's duties and responsibilities are set forth in the ByLaws. The Executive Committee shall not have the power to: a. approve any contract for a term longer than three years; b. approve any contract involving expenditure by, or revenue to Cascade in excess of such amounts and under such circumstances as set forth in the ByLaws; Cascade lnterlocal Contract 13- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 321 C. retain or dismiss the chief executive officer or determine the chief executive officer's compensation; or d. take any actions expressly reserved to the Board by this Contract or the ByLaws. The Executive Committee shall have the authority, if necessary, to avoid default on any Bond, to withdraw from any capital reserve fund or rate stabilization fund, an amount equal to the amount necessary to avoid a default and to authorize payment of that amount to avoid default. Section 4.6 Staff, Consultants and Contractors. Cascade staff shall consist of a chief executive officer and other positions established by the Board. The Board shall appoint, designate the title of, and establish the compensation range of the chief executive officer. The Board shall hire or retain legal counsel and independent accountants and auditors for Cascade. The authority to hire other consultants may be delegated to the Executive Committee. The chief executive officer appoints persons to fill other staff positions, and those appointments may be subject to ratification by the Board or the Executive Committee if the ByLaws so provide. The Board may also provide that administrative, professional or technical services be performed by contract. Section 4.7 Budget; Dues; Financial Management. The Board must approve an annual budget determining Cascade's revenues and expenditures no later than sixty (60) days before the beginning of the fiscal year in which that budget will be in effect. The budget will be developed and approved according to a schedule established by the ByLaws. The budget must identify the levels of Member Charges on which revenue projections are based. The Board may amend the budget. Cascade lnterlocal Contract -14- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 322 Each Member must pay annual dues to defray part or all of Cascade's administrative costs based on the number of CERUs served by its water system, regardless of water usage or capacity, and regardless of whether those units are served by the Supply System or by Independent Supply. Total administrative dues collected from all Members may not exceed 9% of Cascade's annual revenue requirement service. This limit may be amended in the budget by a 65% Dual Maiority Vote of the Board. The Board may establish minimum annual dues per Member and may provide that less than all of a Member's CERUs be taken into account in establishing dues. All Cascade books and records shall be open to inspection by the Washington State Auditor. ARTICLE 5. Asset Development and Supply Commitment Section 5.1 Property Acquisition, Ownership and Disposition. Cascade may construct, purchase, rent, lease, manage, contract for, or otherwise acquire and dispose of Water Supply Assets and other assets. Cascade may control and manage both the assets it owns and the assets that are owned by Members that have transferred control and management of those assets to Cascade. This Contract does not vest in Cascade any authority with respect to Members' other facilities or assets, such as Water Supply Assets retained by Members as Independent Supply. Subject to Cascade's agreement, a Member may transfer to Cascade its title to, or operational control and management of Water Supply Assets. Water Supply Assets may also be fully retained Members as Independent Supply, subject to the provisions of Article 6. At the discretion of the Board, Cascade may accept title to, or operational control and Cascade Interlocal Contract 15 Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 323 management of Water Supply Assets offered by Members or accept supply assets that constitute all or part of a Member's Satellite System(s). The Board may accept supply assets subject to the terms and conditions arrange between Cascade and the Member, based on the result of the audit process and mutual needs. Cascade may enter into Asset Transfer Agreements which shall provide for the terms and conditions of. (a) Cascade's operation of the transferred Water Supply Asset with respect to the Member transferring the asset; (b) Cascade's operation, maintenance and replacement of the Water Supply Asset as part of the Supply System; (c) return or disposition of the Water Supply Asset if Cascade terminates its existence or the Member withdraws; (d) continuation of service (if appropriate) to Members or former Members by the Member receiving the Water Supply Asset at reasonable rates and charges or payment to Cascade of the cost of replacing the Water Supply Asset; and (e) such other conditions as the Board and the Member agree upon. Members shall not be deemed to hold legal ownership rights in any Water Supply Assets owned by Cascade whether those Water Supply Assets have been developed by, purchased by, or transferred to Cascade, and regardless of the accounting treatment of RCFC payments and other payments made to Cascade. Section 5.2 Supply Commitment Section 5.2.1 Commitment to Members. Beginning on the Cascade Supply Date, Cascade shall provide a Fully Supply Commitment to each Founding Member. Thereafter, Cascade shall provide a Full Supply Commitment to meet all current and future water supply needs of a Member that joins with Water Supply Assets sufficient to provide for Cascade Interlocal Contract -16- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 324 its needs during the following fifteen (15) years (whether or not those Water Supply Assets are transferred to Cascade or retained as Independent Supply) commencing on the Member's Cascade Supply Date. When a supply contract is negotiated with Seattle, any Member that is a Seattle Contract Purveyor shall relinquish its rights under its Seattle Water Purveyor Contract to Cascade and execute such documents as may be necessary to transfer those rights to Cascade. Cascade shall accept those rights and a corresponding obligation to provide a Fully Supply Commitment (net of Independent Supply). The approval of a contract with the City of Seattle providing for the initial acquisition of rights to substantial Water Supply Assets, and any material amendment to that contract, shall be effective upon a 65% Dual Majority Vote, Any Full Supply Commitment shall be subject to water shortages, to Cascade's ability to implement the Water Supply Plan, and to the portion of the Member's needs that can be served by the audited capacity of its Independent Supply. If the needed supply is not available, the shortage shall be shared by all the Members in accordance with Cascade's shortage management plan, except as otherwise provided in Section 5.5. Cascade is not obligated to provide water supply to service area expansions in or outside the urban growth boundary, unless Cascade agrees to such expanded service area. However, Cascade shall be obligated to provide water supply to the entire service area of each Member (as that service area is defined in terms under which the Member was admitted), whether or not some of that service area is within the Member's current jurisdictional boundaries and/or within the current urban growth boundary. Cascade is not obligated to provide increased water supply to any Cascade Interlocal Contract -17- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 325 Member if it is determined that the Member's planning process or plans are materially out of compliance with the requirements of the Growth Management Act. A Member that joins with Water Supply Assets insufficient to provide for its needs for fifteen (15) years receives the Fully Supply it desires only if, when, and to the extent it is available within reliability standards determined by Cascade's system reliability methodology. If sufficient Full Supply is not available within reliability standards determined by Cascade's system reliability methodology, the Member receives partial Full or Interruptible Supply, and Full Supply must be provided within fifteen (15) years. Cascade shall then undertake to include in Cascade's Water Supply Plan, and to acquire the facilities or other assets necessary in the Board's determination to provide for that deficit. If Cascade fails to develop sufficient assets to timely provide the increased Full Supply, the commitment becomes a Full Supply Commitment at the end of that fifteen -(15) year period, and any shortage shall be shared by all Members in accordance with Cascade's shortage management plan. If multiple Members request new Full Supply, requests must be honored in the order received (i.e., in the order in which application is made accompanied by the application fee). With respect to new Members, requests for Full Supply "vest" no earlier than the date that membership is effective. In cases of conflict or ambiguity, the Board may determine the order of requests. Section 5.2.2 Additional Rules for Members Retaining Independent Supply. Whenever Cascade has a Supply Commitment to a Member that retains Independent Supply, Cascade shall provide Full Supply for all of that Member's water supply needs minus Cascade Interlocal Contract Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 326 the amount of water that an audit determines may be provided by that Member's Independent Supply. Members are not required to share shortages resulting from the loss or all or part of Independent Supply, although Cascade may make Interruptible Supply available to a Member that loses Independent Supply at prices that are consistent with the price of Interruptible Supply being made available to others at that time. Cascade may at any time and at its cost and expense carry out audits of a Member's Independent Supply. A Member requesting an additional Full Supply Commitment due to loss of Independent Supply shall make that request by Resolution of the requesting Member's legislative authority. When and as determined by the Board, the Member shall pay an amount equal to the RCFCs allocable to the number of CERUs that can be served by the replacement supply provided or to be provided by Cascade. Cascade shall then include the supply in its Water Supply Plan, and provide the supply when it becomes available, but in any event within fifteen (15) years. If, within fifteen (15) years the supply is not available, Cascade's commitment becomes a Full Supply Commitment and any shortage with respect to that supply must be shared by all the Members in accordance with the Shortage Management Plan, except as otherwise provided in Section 7.3. Section 5.2.3 Additional Rules for Source Exchange. The Board may, at its sole discretion, authorize a Cascade Source Exchange Program Agreement with a Member or Non Member. The terms and conditions of a Cascade Source Exchange Program Agreement shall be developed from a source exchange proposal submitted to the Board. The agreement shall identify: (a) the water right (instantaneous and annual) to be augmented or replaced; (b) the Water Supply Assets to be utilized; (c) mechanisms and arrangements for delivery of Cascade Interlocal Contract _19- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 327 regional water; (d) characteristics of supply obligation (for example, peak and average quantities, seasonal or annual delivery duration, interruptibility and shortage management); (e) reporting requirements; (fl changes in operation needed to benefit stream flow and fish; (g) rates and charges; and (h) such other conditions as the Board and the Member or public water supplier agree upon. The agreement may or may not provide for adjustments to a Member's RCFC payments or credits and whether or not the source exchange is a loss of a Member's Independent Supply that would be subject to the provisions of Section 5.2.2. Section 5.3 Financing of Assets. The acquisition of new capital facilities and other Water Supply Assets may be financing using RCFCs, transfers or Water Supply Assets, Rates and Charges, the issuance of revenue Bonds and such other sources as the Board may deem appropriate. Section 5.3.1 Issuance of Bonds. An Authorized Issuer may issue Bonds payable from and secured solely by all or a portion of Net Cascade Revenue, evidencing indebtedness up to an amount approved by Resolution for the Board in order to provide financing or refinancing to acquire, construct, receive, own, manage, lease or sell real property, personal property, intangible property and other Water Supply Assets, to establish debt service reserves, to provide for capitalized interest and to pay the costs of issuance of, and other costs related to the issuance of the Bonds. Such Bonds shall be payable solely from all or a portion of the Net Cascade Revenue or (if the Authorized Issuer is other than Cascade) from payments to be made by Cascade out of all or a portion of Net Cascade Revenue, and such Bonds shall not pledge the full faith and credit or taxing power or, except as expressly provided by contract, the revenue, assets or funds of any Member. Cascade Interlocal Contract -20- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 MVI Members serving as Authorized Issuers may conduct the financing through "separate systems" permitted by their applicable bond resolutions, or in some other appropriate manner, and Cascade may compensate those Members for all costs associated with the financing. Bond related documents of Authorized Issuers other than Cascade must expressly permit the Bonds to be refunded or prepaid without penalty prior to their stated maturity, on and after such dates as are approved by the Authorized Issuer and the Board, to allow for a transfer of the obligation to Cascade or to Cascade's successor entity, including without limitation a joint operating agency or similar entity, as may be permitted by law. Section 5.3.2 Pledge of Revenues. For as long as any Bonds payable from Net Cascade Revenue (or any portion thereof) are outstanding, Cascade irrevocably pledges to establish, maintain and collect all Member Charges in amounts sufficient to pay when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds (and, if the Authorized Issuer is other than Cascade, in addition to the foregoing pledge, to pledge to make timely payments to that Authorized Issuer for the payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds), together with amounts sufficient to satisfy all debt service reserve requirements, debt service coverage requirements, and other covenants with respect to the Bonds. Each Member hereby irrevocably covenants that it shall establish, maintain and collect rates, fees or other charges for water and other services, facilities and commodities related to the water supply it receives from Cascade and/or its water utility at levels adequate to provide revenues sufficient to enable the Member to: (a) make the payment required to be made under this Contract; and (b) pay or provide for payment of all other charges and obligations payable from or constituting a charge or lien upon such revenues. Each Member hereby Cascade Interlocal Contract -21- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 329 acknowledges that this covenant and its covenant in Section 7.9 of this Contract may be relied upon by Bond owners, consistent with this Contract. Each Member shall pay the Member Charges imposed on its whether or not the Water Supply Assets to be financed through the issuance of Bonds are completed, operable or operating, and notwithstanding the suspension, interruption interference, reduction or curtailment in the operation of any Water Supply Assets for any reason whatsoever, in whole or in part. Member Charges shall not be subject to any reduction, whether by offset or otherwise, and shall not be conditioned upon the performance or nonperformance of any Member, or of any entity under this or any other agreement or instrument. However, credits against future RCFCs and Rates and Charges described in Sections 5.5 and 7.5, respectively, for development or addition of excess capacity that is either transferred to Cascade or retained as Independent Supply, shall not be considered "offsets" or "reductions" for the purposes of this Section. If, in connection with the issuance of obligations, any Member establishes a new lien position on revenues relating to its water utility, that Member shall covenant in the relevant documents that the amounts to be paid to Cascade as Member Charges shall be treated either: (a) as part of that Member's internal operation and maintenance costs payable prior to debt service on those obligations; and/or (b) for any portion of those Member Charges that is allocable to capital costs, as a contract resource obligation payable prior to debt service on those obligations. If any Member has existing outstanding revenue obligations relating to its water utility, it shall include substantially similar "springing covenants" in the documents relating to any new parity obligations. Cascade Interlocal Contract -22- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 330 Section 5.3.3 Continuing Disclosure. To meet the requirements of United States Securities and Exchange Commission "SEC Rule 15c2- 12(b)(5) (the "Rule as applicable to a participating underwriter for any Bonds and any obligation of each Member as an "Obligated Person" under the Rule, Cascade and each Member agree to make an appropriate written undertaking, respectively, for the benefit of holders of the Bonds consistent with the requirements of the Rule. Section 5.3.4 Preservation of Tax Exemption for Interest on the Bonds. Each Member covenants that it will take all actions necessary to prevent interest on tax- exempt Bonds from being included in gross income for federal income tax purposes, and it will neither take any action nor make or permit any use of proceeds of tax exempt Bonds or other funds treated as proceeds of those Bonds at any time during the term of those Bonds that will cause interest on those Bonds to be included in gross income for federal income tax purposes. Section 53.5 Additional Certificates. Each Member further agrees to provide such certificates or verifications as are reasonably requested by an Authorized Issuer in connection with the issuance of Bonds under this Section. Section 5.4 Supply Expansions and System Extensions. Cascade must provide for Supply System expansions and extensions to meet the needs of additional water customers of Members, subject to consistency with applicable growth management plans and comprehensive plans, Cascade's water supply plan, orderly asset development, reasonable cost and financing capacity. The Board shall establish a water supply development process, including criteria governing the evaluation of new projects, and that process must promote Cascade lnterlocal Contract -23- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 331 equality of costs and services (other than direct local services), regardless of geographic location. The results of the water supply planning process must be reflected in Cascade's Water Supply Plan. The Board shall have the authority to undertake new projects identified in Cascade's Water Supply Plan for the expansion of Water Supply Assets and regional transmission system extensions to meet Members' projected needs. To reduce costs, Cascade may, to the extent that the Board deems advisable, enter into agreements with Members to wheel water through their existing systems. When facilities are constructed that are used partially by Cascade for wheeling water and partially by Members or other entities for their purposes, the Board may determine an appropriate Cascade contribution to the cost of those facilities. Existing arrangements among Members (and between Members and Non Members), in place when a Member joins Cascade, remain unaffected except as otherwise agreed between Cascade and the other entities concerned. Section 5.5 Regional Capital Facilities Charges. To allocate growth costs to those Members that require capacity increases, each Member shall pay to Cascade an RCFC for each new CERU connected to its water distribution system. Growth in water usage by existing CERUs is not subject to RCFCs unless that growth constitutes as CERU increase as provided in the RCFC Methodology. Members with a supply deficit must pay an RCFC commensurate with that deficit. To the extent that a Member transfers to Cascade or retains as Independent Supply water supply in excess of its needs, it receives a corresponding credit against future RCRCs. Cascade ]nterlocal Contract -24- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 332 Subject to the provisions of Section 5.2.2, a Founding Member pays no RCFCs with respect to the number of CERUs served as of January 31, 2003, or other such later date as determined by Resolution of the Board. A new Member with adequate supply shall commence paying RCFCs fifteen (15) years prior to the date that its Water Supply Assets are projected to be insufficient to provide for its needs as determined by the Board (taking into consideration the results of the Water Supply Audit). A Member that joins with Water Supply Assets that are projected to be insufficient to provide for its needs for fifteen (15) years shall immediately pay RCFCs for the number of CERUs representing the deficit as determined by the Board. RCFCs shall be calculated according to the RCFC Methodology, which shall define the analytical steps required to calculate the RCFCs according to the greater o£ (a) the incremental difference between the average unit cost of expanding the system (i.e., the marginal cost of new capacity) and the average unit cost of the existing system; or (b) the average unit cost of past construction of the existing system plus then- planned Supply System improvements. The methodology shall provide for an annual escalator, recalculation and update not less frequently than every fifth year, and a methodology for determining CERUs. The RCFCs shall be imposed on the Member for each new CERU of that Member in accordance with the terms of this Contract. Amendments to the RCFC Methodology shall require a 65% Dual Majority Vote. If a Founding Member owns Water Supply Assets or transfers Water Supply Assets to Cascade under Section 5. 1, to the extent the audited capacity of those assets (including Seattle Cascade Interlocal Contract -25- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 333 Contract Purveyor rights) exceeds the Member's needs, that Member shall receive a credit against future RCFCs. If a Member seeks to transfer assets substantially in excess of its foreseeable needs, Cascade may negotiate appropriate compensation arrangements for the transfer. Members that develop new Independent Supply that is approved by the Board in accordance with Article 6, similarly receive a credit effective when the Independent Supply is placed in service as determined by the Board. A Member that accepts ownership of a Satellite System that Cascade agrees to serve shall pay an RCFC for the amount of supply needed to serve that system in excess of its rated capacity. Members that experience a net reduction in the number of CERUs served shall receive a CERU- for -CERU credit against future RCFCs. RCFC credits may not be transferred among Members without Board approval. Members shall not be required to pass RCFCs to their customers as capital facilities charges, but may provide for the payment of RCFCs in whatever manner. they deem appropriate. For Members joining with an unmet net supply need, Cascade may, under circumstances determined by the Board, require the prepayment of RCFCs allocable to the full amount of the requested supply, i.e., when funds are needed to begin the construction of facilities immediately. Section 5.6 Transfer Upon Mergers, Consolidations and Assumptions. If: (a) two or more Members merge or consolidate; (b) a Member or a Non Member assumes Cascade Interlocal Contract -26- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 334 jurisdiction of part or all of a Member; or (c) a Member assumes jurisdiction of part or all of a Non Member, the jurisdictions' water supply rights from and obligations to Cascade must be transferred or assumed under applicable law and consistent with the requirements of this Contract and the obligations of Cascade. ARTICLE 6. New Independent Supply Members may not bring new Water Supply Assets on -line as Independent Supply without Board approval. That approval may be granted or denied following an evaluation process, based on whether the Board determines that development of the proposed Independent Supply will benefit or be adverse to the interests of the Members as a whole. Recognizing that in certain circumstances the acquisition of additional Independent Supply might benefit (or cause no material harm to) the Members, new supplies under one (1) MGD may be approved by the Board regardless of the provisions of the Water Supply Plan and without a formal evaluation process. New supplies in amounts greater than one (1) MGD must be described in and be consistent with the Water Supply Plan. Members that have invested in the development of new Independent Supply assets may offer to sell their interest in such assets to Cascade. Cascade may, in its sole discretion and subject to mutually agreeable terms and conditions, purchase the Member's interest in such Independent Supply asset by reimbursing or otherwise compensating the Member for its investment in the project to the extent that investment has been capitalized. Once Cascade has purchased a Member's interest in a project, the project will be considered a Water Supply Asset of Cascade and be incorporated into the Water Supply Plan. ARTICLE 7. Asset Management Cascade Interlocal Contract -27- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 335 Section 7.1 Supply System Management. Cascade is responsible for managing, on behalf of all Members, the Supply System. Cascade is not responsible for managing Independent Supply unless it has expressly agreed to do so. Supply System management responsibilities shall be governed by Cascade's system management plan adopted by the Board. Cascade's system management plan concerns, without limitation, matters such as daily system operations and maintenance, interface with other supply providers, contractual obligations, water quality, billing, management and administration. Cascade may delegate and/or contract out its Supply System responsibilities. Cascade must manage the Supply System in compliance with applicable laws, regulations and Cascade's minimum service standards. Adoption and amendments to the minimum service standards shall require a 65% Dual Majority Vote. Section 7.2 Conservation. Cascade shall develop and carry out, and Members must participate in, water conservation programs that are uniform among Members. The Board shall develop and implement a Cascade conservation management plan that provides a mandatory base conservation program that functions to reduce both average and peak demands and may establish a charge or assessment to fund development and implementation of the program. Members may implement additional conservation programs. The Board may adopt wholesale charges in addition to normal Demand Share charges to encourage resource conservation. The Board may also provide or contribute to additional local conservation programs that are not offered to all Members, and these local programs may be locally funded or funded by Cascade. Members that fail to comply with base programs as set forth in Cascade Interloeal Contract -28- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 336 Cascade's conservation management plan may be required to assume a disproportionate reduction in water supply or to pay penalty charges, or both. Section 7.3 Shortages and Emergency. Section 7.3.1 Shortages. Members must respond to water shortages in a collective, shared fashion under a Cascade shortage management plan adopted by the Board. Resources must be shared in a manner that reduces the risk of severe shortages to each Member. Cascade's shortage management plan may include without limitation, a definition and classification of shortages, a shortage contingency plan including mandatory programmatic actions among all Members in the event of shortages, allocation of authority for determining and responding to shortages, and a communications and outreach program for the public. Members shall not be required to implement Cascade's shortage management plan in areas not served by the Supply System. In the event of shortages, Cascade shall reduce or halt Interruptible Supply before invoking the Shortage Management Plan with respect to all Members with a Full Supply Commitment. However, the Board may, by 65% Dual Majority Vote, continue service in the amounts it deems appropriate to one or more Members receiving Interruptible Supply. The Board may require that Members failing to comply with mandatory shortage management programs implemented under Cascade's shortage management plan assume a disproportionate reduction in supply or pay penalty charges, or both. In the event of a Cascade -wide water shortage, Members with Independent Supply may, without penalty, decline to participate in the shortage management program for that shortage by foregoing all supply from Cascade for the duration of the emergency or shortage. Cascade Interlocal Contract -29- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 337 To avoid shortages resulting from emergencies or the inability to develop sufficient supplies, the Board may, by 65% Dual Majority Vote, establish moratoria on connections or additional commitments for future water services by the Members. A moratorium may be discontinued by a Dual Majority Vote of the Board. Section 7.3.2. Emergency. The Board shall include in Cascade's shortage management plan policies and procedures for addressing short-term disruptions of water supply, transmission or water quality, and it may delegate to the General Manager authority to address such disruptions according to such policies and procedures. Section 7.4 Water Quality. Cascade shall be responsible for water quality that meets or exceeds all federal or state requirements at the point of delivery from Cascade to the Member, consistent with applicable laws and regulations. Cascade assumes source water quality responsibility and liability with respect to Water Supply Assets under its ownership or control (including water wheeled to a Member through another Member's facilities). Cascade is also responsible for preparing and carrying out water quality activities compatible with the water quality requirements of regional water suppliers integrated with Cascade's system (e.g., Tacoma, Everett and Seattle). Cascade may, in its sole discretion, determine and adjust the appropriate method and level of treatment of water that it supplies, so long as that water meets applicable state and federal requirements. If water that it supplies meets those requirements, Cascade shall not be obligated to adjust the method or level of treatment so that the water can be more readily blended with a Member's Independent Supply or more readily transmitted through a Member's internal system. Each Member shall remain responsible for water quality within its Cascade Interlocal Contract -30- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 338 respective distribution system, assuming that adequate water supply quality is provided by Cascade at the point of delivery from Cascade. Each Member shall be responsible for all costs related to making water supplied by Cascade compatible with that Member's internal system, including but not limited to, costs of additional treatment. Section 7.5 Water Supply Rates and Charges. The Board shall set Rates and Charges according to a Rate Calculation Methodology adopted from time to time by the Board. The Rate Calculation Methodology for Members' Supply Commitment shall provide for the definition and calculation of Demand Shares and for a uniform pricing structure with a commodity charge and fixed charges allocated by Demand Share. Cascade may sell water to a Non Member under terms and conditions established by the Board. The terms and conditions shall not be more favorable than the terms and conditions under which water is sold to Members. Revenue received from the sale of water to Non Members shall be used to offset or reduce Rates and Charges to Members to the extent practicable, except that such revenue need not be treated as reducing or offsetting those amounts that are necessary for the payment of debt service on Bonds and for the provision of reserve and coverage requirements for the Bonds. A Member shall be assigned a Demand Share based on the Board's best estimate of capacity to be used by that Member. Initially, the Board may base its estimate on a Seattle Contract Purveyor's use of water from Seattle. For a Member that joins without a supply history as a Seattle Contract Purveyor, or for a Member that has received only part of its water from Seattle, the Demand Share shall be established based on an audit of that Member's past Cascade Interlocal Contract 31 Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 339 three (3) years of water use. After three (3) years as a Member, the baseline demand and capacity obligation for that Member shall be fixed based on actual experience as a Member. Specific Demand Shares may be set by the Board to account for circumstances, such as (by way of example and not by limitation) costs of extending the Supply System to a Member, or when Independent Supplies affect regional demand patterns. When water supply from Cascade is wheeled through a Member to another Member, Cascade may presume that the first Member receiving the water is the "User" for calculation of Demand Shares unless the Members concerned instruct Cascade to use a different allocation. Rate credits for Water Supply Asset transfers are not deducted in the calculation of Demand Shares but are applied to reduce what a Member would otherwise pay. The Board must set Member Charges at levels it determines to be sufficient, together with other available revenue sources, to provide adequately for Operation and Maintenance Costs, Bond debt service, coverage and other covenants, replacement and renewal of facilities, reserves and other costs that the Board deems appropriate. The Board may provide that a Member's failure to participate in the planning process may result in penalty charges. A Member that has transferred Water Supply Assets shall receive a credit, determined when those assets are audited and transferred, based on the useful life of those facilities and on the Member's use of the water produced by those assets or an amount of water equivalent to the amount of supply from them. The Board may implement wholesale charges (additional to Demand Share -based charges and variable commodity charges) to reduce extreme peak use (e.g., "peaking -off of the pipe Cascade Interlocal Contract -32- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 340 Water Rates and Charges must be the same for all Members receiving the same class of service (subject to credits, surcharges and penalty charges). Section 7.6 New Water Surcharge. A new water surcharge of $0.75 per 100 cubic feet (ccf) shall be imposed, effective on the Cascade Supply Date, and continue through December 31, 2011. It shall be applicable to all water purchased by Members over and above each Member's Old Water Allowance in the Seattle Purveyor Contract, if applicable, or to all water purchased by non Seattle Purveyor Members. New water surcharge revenues shall be used to offset or reduce Rates and Charges to Members to the extent practicable, except that such revenue need not be treated as reducing or offsetting those amounts that are necessary for payment of debt service on Bonds and for the provision of reserve and coverage requirements for the Bonds. Section 7.7 Franchises and Easements. Except to the extent otherwise required by state law, each Member shall provide franchises and rights of way on, under or across that Member's streets or other property, to Cascade and to other Members for Water Supply Assets, without charging any fees, rent or charges other than the customary and usual right -of- way permit and inspection fees. Section 7.8 Sales of Water to Non Members. Unless approved by the Board, a Member shall not sell water, including source exchange water, supplied by Cascade, nor shall a Member sell Independent Supply offset by water supplied by Cascade to a Non Member. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Member may sell water supplied by Cascade to a Non Member to the extent required by a contract in effect as of the date the Member joins Cascade. Cascade Interlocal Contract -33 Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 341 Section 7.9 Payment Procedures; Default; Step -Up Provisions. Section 7.9.1 Invoice and Payment. (a) Cascade shall provide each Member with periodic invoices showing the Member Charges payable by that Member for the billing period and the due date. Invoices shall be provided monthly or on other such periodic schedule as determined by the Board, but no more frequently than monthly nor less frequently than once every six months. The Board will determine a due date for all invoices. (b) Payment of any and all invoices shall be due and payable on or before the due date, and shall be made by wire transfer or such other means as are agreed to by Cascade and the Member. If a treasurer, trustee, fiscal agent or escrow agent is appointed in connection with the issuance of Bonds, Cascade may require, and specify on the invoice, that certain amounts be provided directly to that person or entity, and the Member shall pay those amounts in the manner and to the person so specified. (c) If full payment of any invoice is not received on or before the due date, such payment shall be considered past due and a late payment charge shall accrue for each day that the invoice remains unpaid. The late payment charge shall equal the product of the unpaid amount and an interest rate established by the Board. Late payment charges shall continue to accumulate until the unpaid amount of the invoice and all late payment charges are paid in full. Further, if an invoice or any portion thereof remains unpaid for more than sixty (60) days after the due date, Cascade may pursue any legally available remedy at law or equity for the unpaid amount, including without limitation, specific performance and collection of the late payment charge. Cascade's right to enforce payments in this regard may be assigned to a Cascade Interlocal Contract .34. Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 342 treasurer, trustee, credit enhancement provider or other entity. Furthermore, upon written notice, Cascade may reduce or suspend delivery of water until the invoice and late payment charges are paid. (d) If any Member disputes all or any portion of an invoice, it shall notify Cascade immediately upon receipt. If Cascade does not concur, the Member shall remit payment of the invoice in full, accompanied by written notice to Cascade indicating the portions of the invoice that the Member disputes and the reasons for the dispute. The Member and Cascade shall make a good faith effort to resolve such dispute. If the Member fails to remit payment of the invoice in full pending resolution of the dispute, the prevailing party in an action relating to the collection of that invoice shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs. Section 7.9.2 Default and Step -Up. (a) If any Member fails to make any payment in full for more than fifty (50) days past the due date, Cascade shall make written demand upon that Member to make payment in full within ten (10) days of the date that the written demand is sent by Cascade. If the failure to pay is not cured within the ten (10) day period, the Member shall be deemed to be in default. (b) Upon an event of default as described in subsection 7.9.2(a), the other Members shall pay Cascade (in addition to Member Charges otherwise due) the defaulting Member's Member Charges in proportion to each remaining Members' Demand Share in accordance with a schedule established by Resolution of the Board. (c) The payment of a proportionate share of the existing defaulted Member's Member Charges by Members shall not relieve the defaulting Member of its liability for those Cascade Interlocal Contract -35- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 343 payments. Cascade shall have a right of recovery from the defaulting Member on behalf of each Member. Cascade may commence such suits, actions or proceedings at law or in equity, including but not limited to suits for specific performance, as may be necessary or appropriate to enforce the obligations of this Contract against any defaulting Member. Cascade's right to enforce payments in this regard may be assigned to a treasurer, trustee, credit enhancement provider or other entity. Amounts recovered by Cascade as payment of amounts due shall be passed through to each Member in proportion to the share that each assumed, in cash or in credit against future Member Charges as the Board shall determine. (d) The prevailing parry in any such suit, action or proceeding, shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney fees and costs against the defaulting Member. ARTICLE 8. Planning Section 8.1 Water Supply Plan. Cascade must plan for its Members' water supply needs. That planning shall be to be compatible with the equivalent planning responsibilities of other wholesale water providers and with state, county and city planning responsibilities under the Growth Management Act. The Board must adopt, and may from time to time amend, a Water Supply Plan that must be based on no less than a twenty- (20) year planning horizon. Cascade shall coordinate its planning effort with local and regional utilities and other appropriate agencies and work to encourage cooperative region -wide planning and coordination. Each Member shall actively participate in Cascade's water supply planning and shall provide to Cascade accurate data regarding its facilities and operations together with good- faith estimates of future needs and a description of any involvement in the development of Cascade Interlocal Contract -36- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 344 new Independent Supplies. Each Member's water comprehensive or system plan shall be consistent with any plans adopted by Cascade, and shall be consistent with applicable requirements of the Growth Management Act and comprehensive plans. Section 8.2 Watershed Management Plan. Cascade may adopt Watershed Management Plans, as appropriate, for the watersheds within its service area provided that a Watershed Management Plan may take the place of, or may be incorporated into a Cascade Water Supply Plan. In fulfilling its responsibilities for watershed management, Cascade may enter into interlocal agreements with Non Member municipalities to engage in watershed management, including development of Watershed Management Plans and the implementation and financing of such plans. Section 8.3 System Reliability Methodology. Cascade shall develop and adopt a system reliability methodology for planning, operation and management purposes. Adoption and amendments to the system reliability methodology shall require a 65% Dual Majority Vote. ARTICLE 9. Filings This Contract must be filed with the King County Office of Records and Elections or with any other applicable county auditor, in accordance with RCW 39.34.040, and must be submitted for review by the Washington State Department of Health and the Washington State Department of Ecology, in accordance with RCW 39.34.050. ARTICLE 10. Duration and Dissolution; Withdrawal Cascade lnterlocal Contract 37 Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 345 Section 10.1 Duration. Except as provided in Section 10.3, Cascade shall remain in existence for the longer of the following: (a) the period it holds any assets; (b) the period during which Bonds are outstanding; or (e) the period it continues to include Members. Section 10.2 Withdrawals. A Member may notify Cascade of its intent to withdraw by delivery to Cascade of a Resolution of its legislative authority expressing such intent. Upon receipt of such Resolution, the Member shall lose its right to vote and the Board shall determine (a) the withdrawing Member's allocable share of the cost of the then existing obligations of Cascade; and (b) the withdrawing Member's obligations to Cascade. "Then existing obligations of Cascade" means obligations or costs incurred by Cascade as of the date the Member's withdrawal notice is received, including but not limited to Bond obligations, contract obligations and cash financed capital projects; provided that a withdrawing Member's allocable share shall in no event include an obligation for future expenses for which Cascade has not incurred a legal obligation; and provided further, that to the extent the Member's obligation (with respect to such costs) is re -paid over time, the Member shall be entitled to a credit for supply abandoned by the Member and is otherwise used by Cascade. A "withdrawing Member's obligation to Cascade" includes but is not limited to, the Member's share of fixed operating costs, any other expenses contained in Cascade's adopted budget for that year, and any assessments or other similar charges lawfully imposed by Cascade. For purposes of the preceding sentence, "fixed operating costs" shall be determined in the year of withdrawal, and the Member's obligation with respect to such costs shall be limited only to that amount required to pay for supply abandoned by the Member and not otherwise used by Cascade. Cascade Interlocal Contract -38- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 346 The allocable share of cost or obligations shall be determined by the Board, taking into consideration as deemed applicable by the Board: (a) the ratio of the Member's Demand Share to total Member demand; (b) the ratio of the Member's contribution to Cascade revenue to total Cascade revenue including RCRCs; (e) the cost or a portion of the cost of capital projects or facilities specially benefiting the Member; and (d) and any other factor the Board deems appropriate to consider. The Member's withdrawal shall be effective on payment of such allocable share or provision for arrangements to pay such allocable share that are satisfactory to the Board. Until the effective date of withdrawal, the Member shall continue to comply with all applicable provisions of this Interlocal Contract. Upon withdrawal, except as provided in an Asset Transfer Agreement, the withdrawing Member shall have no right to, or interest in any Water Supply Assets owned by Cascade. The withdrawing Member shall be deemed to have abandoned any and all rights to service, to the use of Cascade Water Supply Assets or other rights with respect to Cascade (except as otherwise expressly provided in this Contract). Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 10.2, Cascade will, upon the withdrawal of a Member that has transferred operational control and management of (but not title to) an Independent Supply Asset to Cascade under Section 5. 1, return operational control of such asset to the withdrawing Member. Return of operational control and management will be subject to: (a) continued use by Cascade, to the extent and for such time as the Board deems such use necessary for Cascade to continue providing service to its Members; and (b) payment or provision for payment of any Cascade costs, including but not limited, to those associated with the withdrawing Member's Independent Supply Asset. Cascade Interlocal Contract -39- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 347 The Board may establish additional generally applicable conditions and requirements for withdrawal. Section 10.3 Dissolution. Cascade may be dissolved by a 65% Dual Majority Vote. Upon dissolution, except as provided in an Asset Transfer Agreement, Cascade's assets initially shall be held by its then current Members as tenants in common. Each Member's ownership interest must be based on that Member's Demand Share as of the time of the dissolution. Cascade's liabilities (including Bonds and other contractual obligations) initially shall be distributed based on Members Demand Shares as of the time of the dissolution. Assets and liabilities must be distributed in accordance with agreement or contract, under a voluntary mediation process, or by a court of law. A court may appoint an arbitrator or special master. Distribution shall be based on the best interests of efficient and economic water supply in the entire area served by the Members, subject to a rebuttable presumption that Water Supply Assets will be returned to the Member that originally transferred them to Cascade. That presumption may be overcome by a showing that another asset distribution is in the best interests of efficient and economic water supply. The proceeds of any sale of assets must be distributed among the then current Members based on the Demand Shares at the time of dissolution. Section 10.4 Successor Entity. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 10.3, upon a 65% Dual Majority Vote (ratified within one hundred and twenty (120) days by 65 as measured by Dual Majority Vote of the Members' legislative authorities, all assets, liabilities, and obligations of Cascade may be transferred to any successor entity (including without limitation, a joint operating agency or other municipal corporation, as permitted under Cascade Interlocal Contract -40- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 iI state law), and all obligations of Members and parties contracting with Cascade become obligations to the successor entity. ARTICLE 11. Amendments. Amendments to this Contract shall be effective upon approval by 65% Dual Majority Vote (ratified within one hundred and twenty (120) days by 65 as measured by Dual Majority Vote of the Members' legislative authorities. ARTICLE 12. Applicable Law and Venue. This Contract is governed by the laws of the state of Washington. The venue for any legal action arising from a dispute under this Contract is the Superior Court for King County. ARTICLE 13. No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no third -party beneficiaries to this Contract except for the rights of Bond owners as provided in Section 5.3.2, no person or entity other than an agency signatory to this Contract shall have any rights hereunder or any authority to enforce its provisions, and any such rights or enforcement must be consistent with and subject to the terms of this Contract. ARTICLE 14. Severability. If any provision of this Contract or its application is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid, or void, the validity of the remaining provisions of this Contract or its application to other entities or circumstances shall not be affected. The remaining provisions continue in full force and effect, and the parties' rights and obligations must be construed and enforced as if the Contract did not contain the particular invalid provision. But if the invalid provision or its application is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be substantive and to render performance of the remaining provisions Cascade Interlocal Contract -41- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 i! unworkable and infeasible, is found to seriously affect the consideration, and is inseparably connected to the remainder of the contract, the entire Contract is deemed void. ARTICLE 15. Entire Agreement. This Contract constitutes the entire and exclusive agreement between the parties relating to the specific matters covered in this Contract. All prior or contemporaneous verbal or written agreements, understandings, representations or practices relative to the foregoing are superseded, revoked and rendered ineffective for any purpose. This Contract may be altered, amended or revoked only as set forth in Article 11. No verbal agreement or implied covenant may be held to vary the terms of this Contract, any statute, law, or custom to the contrary notwithstanding. Cascade Interlocal Contract -42- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 350 Cascade Water Alliance B 2 Title: Chair Attest: Title: Chief Executive Order Authorized by: Resolution No. 2011 -17 Date: Cascade interlocal Contract Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 October 26, 2011 Cascade Water Alliance -43- Date: /o /./W Date: 1 1 0 351 ARTICLE 16. Execution. This Contract may be executed in one or more counterparts. Signatory Aeencv By: Title: Attest: Title: Authorized by (Resolution or Ordinance): Date: City of Bellevue Cascade Interlocal Contract -44- Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 Date: Date: 352 ARTICLE 16. Execution. This Contract may be executed in one or more counterparts. Sienatory Aaencv By: Title: Attest: Title: Authorized by (Resolution or Ordinance): Date: Covington Water District Cascade Interlocal Contract Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 Date: Date: 353 ARTICLE 16. Execution. This Contract may be executed in one or more counterparts. Sisnatory A2encv, By: Title: Attest: Title: Authorized by (Resolution or Ordinance): Date: City of Issaquah Cascade Interlocal Contract Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 Date: Date: 354 ARTICLE 16. Execution. This Contract may be executed in one or more counterparts. Signatory Agencv By: Title: Attest: Title: Authorized by (Resolution or Ordinance): Date: City of Kirkland Cascade Interlocal Contract Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 Date: Date: 355 ARTICLE 16. Execution. This Contract may be executed in one or more counterparts. Sisnatory Aeenev By: Title: Attest: Title: Authorized by (Resolution or ordinance): Date: City of Redmond Cascade Interlocal Contract Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 Date: Date: 356 ARTICLE 16. Execution. This Contract may be executed in one or more counterparts. Ski natory A encv Title: Date: Attest: Title: Date: Authorized by (Resolution or Ordinance): Date: Sammamish Plateau Water Sewer District Cascade Interlooal Contract Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 357 ARTICLE 16. Execution. This Contract may be executed in one or more counterparts. Signatory Agency By: Title: Attest: Title: Authorized by (Resolution or ordinance): Date: Skyway W &S District Cascade Interlocal Contract Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 Date: Date: ARTICLE 16. Execution. This Contract may be executed in one or more counterparts. SignatorvAgencX By: Title: Attest: Title: Authorized by (Resolution or Oidinance): Date: City of Tukwila Cascade lnterlocal Contract Amended and Restated October 26, 2011 Date: Date: 359 .f UTILITIES COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes November 15, 2011— 5: 00 p.m. Conference Room 1 Citv of Tukwila Utilities Committee PRESENT Councilmembers: De'Sean Quinn, Chair; Dennis Robertson and Kathy Hougardy Staff: Bob Giberson, Frank Iriarte, Robin Tischmak, Pat Brodin, Ryan Larson, Mike Cusick, David Cline, Gail Labanara and Kimberly Matej CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:02p.m. I. PRESENTATIONS No presentations. II. BUSINESS AGENDA A. Consultant Selection and Agreement: 2012 Annual Small Drainage Program, Staff is seeking approval to enter into a consultant agreement with KPG, Inc. in the amount of $64,945.76 for design services for the City's 2012 Annual Small Drainage Program. KPG was chosen from the City's consultant roster (Municipal Research and Services Center Rosters), and has designed the Annual Small Drainage Program since 1991. Staff commented that construction of two 2011 Small Drainage projects were delayed, and the construction of these 2011 projects will be combined with construction of the 2012 projects. The five projects listed below have been identified for construction in 2012 through maintenance and citizen concerns: Gilliam Creek Southcenter Boulevard Street crossing Pipe repairs near the intersection of South 128`" Street and 37` Avenue South Tukwila Parkway Outfall Pipe Ryan Hill Pipe repairs Fort Dent Outfall improvements Through this design services agreement, KPG, Inc. will be able to tell the City the most cost effective way to approach and construct these projects. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL.FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. B. Interlocal Contract Amendment: Cascade Water Alliance Staff is seeking Council approval to amend the current interlocal agreement with Cascade Water Alliance (CWA) which changes the calculation of administrative dues /costs from $1,000,000 or 5% of CWA's annual revenue requirement to 9 It also allows this limit to be amended by a 65% dual majority vote of the CWA Board. A dual majority requires a majority of votes according to two separate criteria in this case it refers to a vote of the members and a vote based on demand shares. As mentioned above, this amendment essentially reallocates member costs based on demand shares. Tukwila will see an increase of approximately $60,000 in annual administrative costs which is a pass through directly onto the ratepayers. The Committee requested that staff include the original administrative costs along with the new costs in the memo that goes to full Council. They also requested additional information from CWA that would explain the implications of the amendment in greater detail. It was suggested that the Committee consider reviewing CWA Board minutes when information and /or decisions pertain to Tukwila. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. 361 362 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials ITEM NO. Meeting Date I Prepared by Mayors review C n 'l review 11/28/11 B 12/05/11 B i 4.K. ITEM INFORMATION CAS NUMBER: I STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 11/28/11 AGENDA I rEI\4 TITLE Purchase Street Department's Thermoplastic Striper CATI3GORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance BidAward Public Hearing ❑Other Mtg Date 11/28/11 Mtg Date 12/05/11 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date SPONSOR Council Mayor HR DCD .Finance Fire IT P &R Police PW SPONSOR'S This purchase will replace a roadway paint striper with a thermoplastic striper. The 501 SUMMARY Fund has a current budget of $80,000.00 for a paint striper, but the thermoplastic striper will cost $92,896.52. For the budget shortfall of $12,896.52, we are proposing to use $4,840.00 from the Street department's 501 depreciation balance and the remaining $8,056.52 from the Street's roadside budget, 000.16.542.700.31.00. Council is being asked to approve the purchase in the amount of $92,896.52. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 11/21/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: JOAN HERNANDEZ RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADI\4IN. Public Works CoMMrI`rl r_. Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole. COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDI "PURE R-QUIRI -D AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $92,896.52 $80,000.00 $12,896.52 Fund Source: 501. EQUIPMENT RENTAL (FLEET) AND 000.16. STREETS Comments: IMTG.DATEI RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 11/28/11 12/05/11 MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS 11/28/11 Informational Memorandum dated 11/18/11 Page 299, 2011 -2012 Biennial Budget Thermoplastic Striper Brochure Minutes from the Transportation Committee meetings of 11/21/11 12/05/11 363 364 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Transportation Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director DATE: November 18, 2011 SUBJECT: 2011 501 Fund Equipment Rental Budqet Purchase of a Thermoplastic Striper ISSUE Purchase pavement marking equipment listed in the 2011 Budget. BACKGROUND The existing paint striper was purchased in 2000 and total depreciation was achieved in 2010. A new unit was budgeted in 2010; however, all equipment purchases were put on hold due to the economic downturn. The budget funds were then included in the 2011 Budget as a carryover, Line 18 on page 299 for $80,000.00. ANALYSIS As paint usually begins to fade within 6 -12 months after application, we are proposing to purchase a thermoplastic striper. Using Thermoply instead of paint will increase efficiency of operations significantly by increasing the life expectancy of the pavement markings. The Thermoply application normally lasts several years. Alpine Products of Auburn was the low bidder for King County's system and the City of Tukwila can piggy back on their bid for the same system. The Thermoply system includes a trailer, melter, and an applicator. BUDGET SUMMARY The purchase price for a new thermoplastic striper is $92,896.52 and with the $80,000.00 budgeted; a balance of $12,896.52 is still needed. We are proposing to use $4,840.00 liquidated from the 501 fund from a Street Department's Line Locator that has been completely depreciated and will not be replaced. The remaining funding difference of $8,056.52 can be funded from the Streets Department's roadside budget line 000.16.542.700.31.00. RECOMMENDATION Approve purchase in the amount of $92,89.6.52 per King County bid for a Thermoplastic Striper from Alpine Products and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular meeting. Attachments Page 299, 2011 -2012 Biennial Budget Photo of Thermoply application Thermoplastic Striper Brochure W: \Shared Copy Only \Gail \Info Memo Thermo Pavement Markings 11- 18- 11.doc 365 366 2011 -2012 Biennial Budget City of Tukwila, Washington TOTAL CARRYOVERS 151,100 1 GRAND TOTALS 943,100 1 Page 299 367 NEW REPLACEMENT PURCHASES IN 2011 -2012 EST. PURCHASE REPLACEMENT DESCRIPTION UNIT COST YEAR YEAR UNIT POLICE: 1 Patrol Car 1117 53,000 2011 2014 Patrol Car 2 Patrol Car 1716 53,0001 2011 2014 Patrol Car 3 Patrol Car 1718 53,0001 2011 2014 Patrol Car 4 Patrol Car 1719 53,000 2011 2015 Patrol Car 5 Patrol Car 1720 53,000 2011 2015 Patrol Car 6 Patrol Car 1721 53,000 2011 2015 Patrol Car 7 Patrol Car 1127 53,0001 2011 2015 Patrol Car 8 Patrol Car, K -9 1 1722 57,0001 2011 2015 Patrol Car, K -9 9 Patrol Car, K -9 1 1728 57,0001 2011 1 2015 Patrol Car, K -9 10 Detective Admin Sedan 1145 25,0001 2012 I 2019 Detective Admin Sedan 11 Detective Admin Sedan 1157 25,000 2012 1 2019 Detective Admin Sedan 12 Major Crimes ER Adm Sedan 1122 27,000 2012 2019 Mjr Crms ER Adm Sedan 13 Major Crimes ER Admin Sedan 1163 27,000 2012 2019 Mjr Crms ER Adm Sedan FIRE: 14 Command Car, BC 1281 85,000 2012 2019 Command Car, BC* *Note: Per TMC 3.80, FD must fund cost above 10% variance (estimated to be approx. $41,200) STREET: 15 Lift Truck (Manlift) 1278 90,0001 2012 2022 Lift Truck (Manhft) PARKS: 16 1 /2 -Ton Pickup 1205 28,000 2012 2019 3 /4 -Ton Pickup TOTAL BUDGETED PURCHASESI 792,000 1 I BUDGETED CARRYOVERS I 17 Utility vehicle w/ Spray Tank 1 1653 $63,600 2011 2021 Utlty veh w/ Spray Tank 18 Paint Striper 1 1445 80,0001 2011 2021 Paint Striper 19 Arrowboard 1427 7,5001 2011 2018 Arrowboard 20 TBD TOTAL CARRYOVERS 151,100 1 GRAND TOTALS 943,100 1 Page 299 367 Equip. Index Page 1 of I CH220m BASIC SPECIFICATIONS 220 lb. Material Tank: Removable /Interchangeable 75.000 BTU Heating System: Highest in the industry. All Steel Extrusion Dies: Heat treated Steel, no drip, clean cut on/off operation. Improved pusl-/pull mechanism eliminates die springs. Variable Width Glass Bead System: 4 6 8 12" and dual 4" lines with the turn of a dial. Hand Torch: Standard equipment for numerous requirements. Lockable Rear Caster: Straight track locked position or 360 degree swivel. Size: Weight: 240 Ibs. (I 10 kgs.) Length: 48 in. (1205 mm) Width: 30 in. (760 mm) Height: 39 in. (980 mm) http:// www. trantexinc .com/equip /egpindx.htm 11/9/2011 368 "lick here for a detailed specification City o f Tukwila Transportation Committee TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes November 21, 2011— 4:00 p.m. Conference Room I `NOTE: Special Start Time PRESENT Councilmembers: Joan Hernandez, Chair; Joe Duffie and Verna Seal Staff: Bob Giberson, Robin Tischmack, Stan Anderson, Jack Pace, Nora Gierloff, David Cline, Gail Labanara and Kimberly Matej Guests: Chuck Parrish CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 4:04 p.m. I. PRESENTATIONS No presentations. II. BUSINESS AGENDA A. Purchase: Thermoplastic Striver Staff is seeking Council approval to purchase a thermoplastic striper from Alpine Products of Auburn in the amount of $92,896.52. Alpine Products was the low bidder for King County, and the City of Tukwila can add to the King County bid for the same striper system. The thermoplastic striper will replace a paint striper, and is expected to significantly increase the life expectancy of pavement markings. The striper includes a trailer, meltor and applicator. $80,000 is budgeted for this purchase in the 501 Fund Equipment Rental Budget as a carry -over from 2010. The additional $12,896.52 needed for the striper will come from monies set aside for a Line Locator ($4,840.00), which will not be replaced, and the Street Department's roadside budget ($8,056.52). UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. B. Purchase: 250 LEOTEK LED Luminaries Staff is seeking Council approval to purchase 250 LED roadway lighting luminaires from LEOTEK Electronics of Milpitas, CA in the amount of $106,488.75. LED lighting provides the following benefits: Reduced power consumption (up to 50 Greater reliability Longer life expectancy Reduced maintenance Lower utility costs Funding for this purchase will come from 2011 Traffic Control in the Streets Division, the Annual Traffic Signal Program, and possibly funds from the Energy Efficiency grant being administered through the Department of Community Development. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. C. Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian /Bicvcle Bridge: Federal and State Grant Acceptance Staff is seeking Council approval for the formal acceptance of the two grants listed below in a total amount of $1,250,833 for design of the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestria/Bicycle Bridge. Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Grant. This is a federal grant which was awarded through the PRSC Contingency List this past August in the amount of $750,833. The grant requires a 13.5% City match ($117,182). Park impact fees are anticipated to be utilized as matching funds. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. 369 370 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials ITEM NO. Meeting Date Prepared by A Mayor's review Coundl review 11/28/11 BG 4. L. 12/05/11 B CAS NUDIBER: AGENDA ITEM TITLE CATEGORY Discussion ITEM INFORMATION STAFF SPONSOR: BO GIBERSON I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 11/28/11 Street Department's Purchase of 250 LEOTEK LED Luminaires Mtg Date 11/28/11 Motion Resolution Ordinance ❑Bid Award Public Hearing Other Mt g Date 12/05/11 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&'R Police PW SPONSOR'S This purchase is for 250 LEOTEK LED roadway lighting luminaires. The latest advances in SUMMARY roadway LED lighting will reduce the power consumption by nearly 50 and provide more reliability and longer life to the light fixtures. The cost of LED fixtures is now only 20 higher than traditional light fixtures. With the remaining budget in Streets and the Annual Signal Program, Council is being asked to purchase 250 LED luminaires in the amount of $106,488.75. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 11/21/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: JOAN HERNANDEZ RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. Public Works COMMITTEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDTTURL, REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $106,488.75 $107,000.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 000.16 STREET DEPARTMENT AND 104. ANNUAL SIGNAL PROGRAM Comments: MTG. DATE j RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 11/28/11 12/05/11 MTG. DATE j ATTACHMENTS 11/28/11 Informational Memorandum dated 11/18/11 Quote Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 11/21/11 12/05/11 371 372 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: FROM DATE: Mayor Haggerton Transportation Committee Bob Giberson, Public Works Director November 18, 2011 SUBJECT: 2011 Street Department's Traffic Control Devices Purchase of 250 LEOTEK LED Luminaires ISSUE Purchase in the amount of $106,488.75 for the acquisition of 250 LED roadway lighting luminaires from LEOTEK Electronics of Milpitas, CA. BACKGROUND Currently, roadway illumination costs the City of Tukwila as much as $190,000 each year in electrical utility costs. The latest advances in roadway LED lighting technology can reduce the power consumption for lighting fixtures by nearly 50 while providing more reliability and longer life to the fixtures. Also, the cost of LED fixtures has been going down over the years and is now only 20% higher than traditional light fixtures. We should expect to see lower utility costs and reduced maintenance calls as we begin to convert the older lighting fixtures that are on metered accounts throughout the City. The 2011 traffic control budget in Streets 000.16 and 104 Fund's Annual Traffic Signal Program both have remaining balances that can be utilized for this purchase. The Department of Community Development's (DCD) Energy Efficiency grant may also be available for this purchase. The Energy grant's timeline is being extended and given that some cities are not using all of their grant funds, we have requested additional funds. Rebates from Puget Sound Energy are also being pursued. This purchase was bid by 2 vendors and LEOTEK Electronics was selected based on LED unit cost per fixture. BUDGET SUMMARY 000.16.542.630.31.01 Street Lighting Supplies 000.16.542.640.31.01 Traffic Control Supplies 104.98.595.800.64.00 Annual Traffic Sianal Proaram Total RECOMMENDATION 9,000.00 75,000.00 23.000.00 107.000.00 Approve purchase in the amount of $106,488.75 for the acquisition of 250 LED roadway lighting fixtures from LEOTEK Electronics and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular meeting. attachment: Quote W: \Shared Copy Only \Gail \Info Memo LED Purchase 11- 18- 11.docz 373 374 QUOTE EAR11 -0002 DATE: 11 -08 -11 PAGE 1 TxLET'G Sea -Tac Lighting controls, LLC. 4439 S. 134th Pl. Bldg E Tukwila, WA 98168 www.seataclighting.com Phone 206 -575 -6865 Fax: 206 -575 -8013 Quotes Fax: 206- 575 -1557 To: Scott Bates Proj: TUKWILA ROADWAY LED 80C City Of Tukwila TUKWILA, WA Tukwila, WA 98188 Bid Date: 11/08/11 433 -186? Vnrrr c Remarks: Qty lType lMfg (D escription I Unit Pricel Extd.Pricel I I I 1 3521 1LEOTIGCI- 80C- MV- NW -2M -GY I 389.001 $136928.001 80LED ARRAY- -REBEL SERIES LED -TYPE 2 MEDIUM I I I4000K I I 1 i INOTE ILEOTIFULL FREIGHT ALLOWED 1 INOTE ILEOTICAN SHIP IN 24HRS AS LONG AS STOCK IN CA OTHERWISE INOTE ILEOTILEAD TIME IS 6 -8 WEEKS Total I 1 $136928.001 IF.O.B. Per MFG (Terms: Net 30 Days (Lead time: 6 -8 Weeks I (Prices firm for entry by: 45 Days IShipment by: 60 Days 1 Subject to manufacturer's published terms and conditions of sale. Quotation is void if changed. Complete quote must be used, no partials unless otherwise noted. No hardware or accessories are included, unless noted. ALL ballast quoted are not brand specific and are chosen at the factories discretion,unless noted. Verification of voltages, mounting methods,row information ceiling style, finishes, etc. is the responsibility of Distributor /Contractor and is reouired at time of order. (Printed 11/08/11 12:59:27 Per: NORA SCHULTZ 375 376 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes City Of Tukwila Transportation Committee November 21,2011-4:00 p.m. —Conference Room I `NOTE: Special Start Time PRESENT Councilmembers: Joan Hernandez, Chair; Joe Duffie and Verna Seal Staff: Bob Giberson, Robin Tischmack, Stan Anderson, Jack Pace, Nora Gierloff, David Cline, Gail Labanara and Kimberly Matej Guests: Chuck Parrish CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 4:04 p.m. I. PRESENTATIONS No presentations. II. BUSINESS AGENDA A. Purchase: Thermoplastic Striver Staff is seeking Council approval to purchase a thermoplastic striper from Alpine Products of Auburn in the amount of $92,896.52. Alpine Products was the low bidder for King County, and the City of Tukwila can add to the King County bid for the same striper system. The thermoplastic striper will replace a paint striper, and is expected to significantly increase the life expectancy of pavement markings. The striper includes a trailer, meltor and applicator. $80,000 is budgeted for this purchase in the 501 Fund Equipment Rental Budget as a carry -over from 2010. The additional $12,896.52 needed for the striper will come from monies set aside for a Line Locator ($4,840.00), which will not be replaced, and the Street Department's roadside budget ($8,056.52). UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. B. Purchase: 250 LEOTEK LED Luminaries Staff is seeking Council approval to purchase 250 LED roadway lighting luminaires from LEOTEK Electronics of Milpitas, CA in the amount of $106,488.75. LED lighting provides the following benefits: Reduced power consumption (up to 50 Greater reliability Longer life expectancy Reduced maintenance Lower utility costs Funding for this purchase will come from 2011 Traffic Control in the Streets Division, the Annual Traffic Signal Program, and possibly funds from the Energy Efficiency grant being administered through the Department of Community Development. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. C. Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian /Bicvcle Bridle: Federal and State Grant Acceotance Staff is seeking Council approval for the formal acceptance of the two grants listed below in a total amount of $1,250,833 for design of the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestria/Bicycle Bridge. Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Grant. This is a federal grant which was awarded through the PRSC Contingency List this past August in the amount of $750,833. The grant requires a 13.5% City match ($117,182). Park impact fees are anticipated to be utilized as matching funds. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. 377 378 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS CAS NUMBER: AGENDA ITEM TITLE Initials Meeting Date I Prepared by Mayors review 11/28/11 1 BGIV C 12/05/11 B ITEM INFORMATION STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON Couni'l review i ITEM NO. 4.M. ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE 11/28/11 Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Consultant Supplemental Agreement No. 13 with IBI Group CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance .Bid Aivard Public Hearing ❑Other ,A/It Dale 11/28/11 Mtg Date 12/05/11 Mtg Date Mtt Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance .Fire Legal P &R Police PWI SPONSOR'S This supplemental agreement will complete the final design of the Transit Center and SUMMARY prepare the bid documents. With the WSDOT Regional Mobility grant of $4.7 million, the Transit Center is funded and scheduled to begin construction in 2012. This supplement is one of two being presented with the Andover Park W street improvements. Council is being asked to approve Supplemental Agreement No. 13 in the amount $429,000.00. RI- VIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 1 1/21/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: JOAN HERNANDEZ RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Public Works Commi'ITT -i- Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EYPEND1'1'URI3 RI QUIRI�-'D AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $429,000.00 $738,000.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREETS (NEW PAGE 16, PROPOSED 2012 CIP) Comments: MTG. DATE I 11/28/11 12/05/11 MTG. DATE 11/28/11 12/05/11 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION ATTACHMENTS Informational Memorandum dated 11/18/11 New page 16, Proposed 2012 CIP Supplemental Agreement No. 13 with IBI Group Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 11/21/11 379 :1 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Transportation Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director DATE: November 18, 2011 SUBJECT: Tukwila Transit Center Project No. 90610402, Contract 06 -019 Supplemental Agreement No. 13 ISSUE Supplement to the IBI Group on the combined Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center and Andover Park W design contract in the amount of $429,000.00. BACKGROUND In February 2006, IBI Group was retained by the City to begin the design of the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center on Andover Park W. The Transit Center's Concept Plan was completed in December 2006. Due to the overlapping design needs of Transit Center and the Andover Park W widening project (98810404), the two projects were combined under the IBI Group contract. The design of the Tukwila Transit Center is at 30% and is coordinated with the design work on Andover Park W. DISCUSSION With the Regional Mobility grant award earlier in 2011, completion of the design and ultimately construction of the Transit Center is estimated to be fully funded. This supplemental agreement is to complete the design work through the final design and PS &E documents. Another supplemental agreement (No. 14) to complete the design effort on Andover Park W, including design of the water main replacement, is being presented to the Transportation Committee at the same time. The supplemental agreements are presented separately to aid in the ease of billing and tracking expenditures by project Fiscal Impact: A new CIP page is attached to represent the additional funds needed for design, with the right -of -way costs reduced (page 16, Proposed 2012 CIP). RECOMMENDATION Approve Supplement No. 13 to Contract No. 06 -019 with the IBI Group in the amount of $429,000.00 and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole and subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular meetings. Attachments: New Page 16, Proposed 2012 CIP Supplemental Agreement #13 WAPW Eng \PROJECTSW- RW RS Projects \06RW02 Transit Center \INFO MEMO Supp #13 IBI Transit Center Design 11- 18- 11.docx 381 *6 CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY 2012 to 2017 PROJECT: Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Project No. 90610402 DESCRIPTION: Design and construct a Transit Center for the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) FUND SOURCES Awarded TOD Grant High transit ridership and bus operations warrant conversion of the existing bus stops on Andover Park West 40 428 468 to a Transit Center. The current facilities are inadequate in size and location to serve Metro operations and JUSTIFICATION: transit riders. City policy encourages the use of transit, and mitigation dollars and parking supply decisions Mitigation Actual 500 have been made based upon the expected improvements to the transit center. 500 STATUS: Design began in 2006. Construction schedule is linked to milestones identified in the State Mobility grant. MAINT. IMPACT: Minimal to moderate, depends on final maintenance agreement with King County Metro. (229) 0 1,376 329 0 0 0 TOD grant of $468k with mitigation from Westfield SIC Mall of $500k for parking variance. WSDOT Regional TOTAL SOURCES COMMENT: Mobility Grant of $4.7m with $3.9m in 2011 -2013 and $835k in 2013 -2015 with a required match of 20% that 0 0 7,522 can include past expenditures, other grants, and ROW value of land dedicated by Westfield. FINANCIAL Through Estimated (in $000's) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 BEYOND TOTAL EXPENSES Design 271 40 738 1,049 Land(R/W) 343 916 1,259 Const. Mgmt. 250 300 550 Construction 2,300 2,364 4,664 TOTAL EXPENSES 614 40 4,204 2,664 0 0 0 0 0 7,522 FUND SOURCES Awarded TOD Grant 40 428 468 Awarded Mob Grant 2,400 2,335 4,735 Mitigation Actual 500 500 ROW Donation 343 343 City Oper. Revenue (229) 0 1,376 329 0 0 0 0 0 1,476 TOTAL SOURCES 614 40 4,204 2,664 0 0 0 0 0 7,522 Project Location 2012 2017 Capital Improvement Program 16 F o i e e i GIs 383 ME SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NUMBER 13 TO CONSULTANT AGREEMENT NUMBER 06 -019 THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, Washington, herein -after referred to as "the City and IBI Groun, hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified. The City desires to supplement the agreement entered into with the Consultant and executed on, February 23, 2006 and identified as Agreement No. 06 -019. All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Scope of Services, is hereby changed to include work described in Attachment A for additional design work on the Tukwila Transit Center Project. 2. Payment, shall be amended as follows: A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit "C" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed $429,000 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. The maximum amount payable under this agreement as supplemented inclusive of all fees and other costs is now $1,221,815. 3. Time for Performance, shall be amended as follows: The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement by December 31, 2012, unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City. DATED this day of 20 CITY OF TUKWILA Jim Haggerton, Mayor CONSULTANT By: Printed Name: Title: 385 x k City of Tukwila TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASES 3 AND 4 NOVEMBER 11TH, 2011 IBI GROUP 387 /a/oxoup SCOPE opWORK PHASE 3: FINAL DESIGN ADDITIONAL SERVICES 1 TaskD: ROW ACquisiUoO.. 1 PHASE4: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 5 Task Project Management o Task 6: Stakeholder Coordination 7 Task 7: Design Documents 0O% and 1U0%i B Task 8:Cost Estimates K0% and 1UU%L-- 11 Task 9:Assistance with Building Permit 11 PHASE S: BID AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT (OPT|ONAL) 12 Task10: Bid Support. 12 Task11: Construction Support 12 SCHEDULEAND FEE 13 November I/th,on1 Page IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK City of Tukwila TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASES 3 AND 4 PHASE 3: FINAL DESIGN ADDITIONAL SERVICES The following additional task has been added to support the Phase 3, Task 3 Right of Way Acquisition work. The objective of this task is to assist the City in ROW acquisition. Work to be performed includes preparation of legal documents detailing the ROW acquisition necessary along Andover Park West to accommodate the new Transit Center, assist with purchase offers, and negotiate final agreements. The general approach will be as follows: Obtain a Right of Entry for no compensation. The area would be from the right of way line to the front of the Firestone building. The purpose would be to obtain information needed to finalize the plan for demolition and remediation of the site after demolition is complete. A request for right to do environmental tests to determine if there are any hazardous materials on site should also be included. Activities for this effort would include detailed topographical survey work, soil testing for hazardous materials and the right to have project personnel enter the property to complete the survey and soil testing. This should be completed as soon as possible. Obtain a Temporary Construction Easement (TCE). Compensation to be determined during an appraisal of the property. The area would be from the existing right of way line to the front of the Firestone building as wide as is needed to allow project personnel and equipment access to demolish the existing canopy, as well as to remediate any damage done to the property during demolition. Remediation should include input from the property owners regarding their wishes for what the site would look like after the canopy is removed and would likely include work such as paving, parking striping, landscaping, irrigation, and lighting. This TCE should show on the right of way plans. Obtain a Permanent Easement. This type of restrictive easement will likely cost the same as a fee simple acquisition if the City were paying for the entire easement. CERTIFIED Land Services (CLS) will also sub contract with an appraisal firm to perform the initial appraisals needed. CLS recommends obtaining at least two bids from qualified WSDOT- approved appraisers that will include costs and delivery schedule. CLS will make a recommendation for the hiring of the appraiser that the City can review and make a final decision on. Assumptions This work will be performed by Certified Land Services, as sub consultant to IBI Group. All forms and conveyance documents will be based on WSDOT templates. CLS will hire and manage a WSDOT- approved Appraiser for both the Southbound stop permanent easement and the Northbound stop right of way assessments. Note that in the Phase 3 scope it was assumed that the City would hire a WSDOT- approved Appraiser. This has been added to Phase 4 scope to move forward with the acquisitions /easements November 11 th, 2011 IBI GROUP 9-1 IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK City of Tukwila TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASES 3 AND 4 with the Phase 3 WSDOT- approved appraiser assumed to be hired by the City representing appraisal of the completed project. There are no relocations for this project. Sign relocations will be considered cost to cure items addressed in appraisals and negotiations. All utilities easements, permits and clearing will be handled by the City. Transactions will be closed in escrow. Agents will prepare escrow agreements for each parcel to clear all encumbrances and parties in interest from each parcel. Commercial parcels typically have multiple parties in interest. All parties in interest will be addressed in clearing title. The City will record all documents and will pay property owners and /or lien holders /encumbrances for any property or property rights acquired for this project. CERTIFED will provide certification prep and review. Acquisition documents for one parcel will be prepared. The acquisition of the parcel assumes that parking will not be impacted. Additional fees will be negotiated for the preparation of a Parking Impact Study. The City of Tukwila will provide title reports for parcels if additional reports are necessary. The task does not include resolving boundary issues should the title reports have conflicting information. Work Activities 3.3. Permanent Easement Firestone The project involves one parcel which is known as the Firestone property (KC Tax ID NO. 92 -247- 0070) which is a commercially zoned property. We anticipate the acquisition of a right of entry for design and environmental assessment of the parcel. Upon completion of final design and right of way plans, the project may require the acquisition of a strip of land in fee simple and improvements located in that strip of land. State and /or federal funds are involved in this project requiring strict adherence to Federal Highways Administration policies and procedures as well as all applicable federal, state and local laws including, but not limited to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and its amendments, 49CFR Part 24, and state Revised Statutes. Work will be in accordance with the WSDOT Local Agencies Guidelines and by reference the WSDOT Right of Way Manual. 3.3.1. CERTIFIED staff will review all documents, files, maps, legal descriptions and other information provided. Errors, questions and clarifications will be reviewed and discussed. 3.3.2. Appraisal Assumptions It is assumed that the Rights of Entry will be obtained for no compensation. 390 November 11 th, 2011 Page 2. IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK City of Tukwila TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASES 3 AND 4 In accordance with funding source requirements and the Agency's approved right of way procedures, CERTIFIED will advise if the acquisition may be acquired with appraisal waiver or if a full narrative appraisal is required. Appraisal tasks include the following: 3.3.2.1. CERTIFIED will prepare a preliminary funding estimate (PFE) for the one (1) fee take parcel describing the parcel, its ownership, the estimated cost of acquisition, labor, escrow, condemnation, and summary of total right of way project costs. 3.3.2.2. An Administrative Offer Summary (appraisal waiver) will be written if the acquisition is valued under $25,000 in the PFE. 3.3.2.3. CERTIFIED will hire and manage the appraiser. 3.3.3. Appraisal Review Assumptions Appraisal Reviews are not necessary for acquisitions valued under $25,000 according to state and federal funding source requirements, and the Agency's approved right of way procedures. If required, the City will hire a WSDOT- approved appraisal reviewer who will provide appraisal review services. Appraisal Review tasks include the following: 3.3.3.1. CERTIFIED will manage the appraisal reviewer hired by the City, and the City will set just compensation from which the offer will be made. 3.3.4. Administrative Assumptions The City will provide a preliminary title commitment for each parcel with Schedule B showing exceptions listed; copies of vesting deeds and supporting documents for all liens and encumbrances of record will be included. PACE will provide all legal descriptions. PACE will provide an exhibit map for the fee acquisition the rights of entry on the project. CERTIFIED staff will maintain all records, files, documents, and reports in accordance with statutory and WSDOT guidelines and regulations. Administrative tasks include the following: 3.3.4.1. CERTIFIED will provide signature ready legal documents that will be used to convey fee or temporary construction easement rights for all parcels. 3.3.4.2. CERTIFIED will provide written status reports on a weekly basis, or as agreed upon, and will provide verbal status reports on demand, as requested. 3.3.5. Negotiation Assumptions CERTIFIED agents will act in good faith at all times. November 11 th, 2011 Page 3. 391 IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK City of Tukwila TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASES 3 AND 4 CERTIFIED staff will never coerce owners in an attempt to settle parcels. CERTIFIED will provide the City with an Administrative Settlement letter for all requested administrative settlements. CERTIFIED staff will work whatever hours are necessary, including evenings and weekends, to make themselves available to owners and their representatives. Negotiation tasks will include the following: 3.3.5.1. CERTIFIED will prepare an offer letter for the parcel. 3.3.5.2. CERTIFIED agents will make at least three (3) personal contacts with the owner with the intent of reaching settlement for the conveyance of property needed. As many contacts as needed to reach settlement will be made, until it is mutually agreed between the City and CERTIFIED that negotiations should be suspended or given to the City Attorney to pursue eminent domain actions. 3.3.5.3. CERTIFIED staff will explain the City's offer verbally and in writing. 3.3.5.4. CERTIFIED staff will provided detailed written diaries for each parcel. 3.3.5.5. CERTIFIED staff will transmit organized parcel files containing all pertinent information, documents, forms, diaries, and Disclaimer Statements. 3.3.5.6. CERTIFIED staff will prepare a condemnation summary memo if the City deems it is necessary to acquire the property through the exercising of its power of eminent domain. 3.3.6. Closing and Conveyance Closing and Conveyance tasks include the following: 3.3.6.1. CERTIFIED staff will review title for each parcel. 3.3.6.2. CERTIFIED will clear all encumbrances on title that are in conflict with the acquisition areas of the partial taking parcel. 3.3.6.3. CERTIFIED will prepare any documents needed for clearing any liens or encumbrances as noted above. 3.3.6.4. CERTIFIED will provide the City with complete files at the close of negotiations for each parcel. Included in our transmittal packages will be conveyance documents ready for the City to record and all documents related to lien and encumbrance removal. Deliverables Updated Right of Way Acquisition Table Legal documents for property acquisition Weekly status reports Detailed written diary for the parcel Documents required to clear any liens or encumbrances A complete record including all files will be provided at the close of negotiations 392 November 11 th, 2011 Page 4. IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK PHASE 4: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS City of Tukwila TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASES 3 AND 4 The Transit Network Plan for the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Subarea' includes as one of its key recommendations the construction of a new transit center in the immediate vicinity of the existing focal point of bus service on Andover Park West and Baker Avenue. A new transit center in this location is expected to act not only as a replacement for the existing bus stop(s); it will also serve the new King County Metro RapidRide F Line that will begin service in 2013. In addition, the new transit center is an important step in the redevelopment of the area, building from current initiatives to redevelop the Southcenter Mall and future plans to redevelop the Tukwila Urban Center. The objective of this Phase of the project is to develop a construction documents package (60% and 100 for the Tukwila Transit Center that provides design documentation, cost information and environmental and geotechnical information to the City that allows for future bidding of the project. This phase will begin from the work completed during Phase 3 described in the Tukwila Transit Center Final Design scope of work dated June 15, 2011 and continue the design process and stakeholder coordination in preparation of bid documents that will include the ability to meet the Regional Mobility grant requirements. A work breakdown structure of five primary tasks has been developed for this Phase of the work, recognizing an overall design timeline of six months. This includes a two -week City Design Review period after both the 60% and Draft 100% submittals. Primary tasks, in general, include the following: Review and assembly of relevant information, including geotechnical and environmental appropriate to completing the design phase of the project including the Firestone Property, Northbound and Baker transit stops. 2. Preparation of stakeholder presentation materials and meeting summaries and participation at meetings. 3. Preparation of construction documents (60% and 100% Draft and Final) plans and specifications. 4. Construction cost estimates for the Transit Center (60% and 100 5. Assistance to the City in preparation of a building permit for the shelters. The following scope describes the work to be conducted, and assumptions and deliverables to be provided. Task 5: Project Management This task includes the day -to -day activities to be performed by the Consultant to manage and administer the work to deliver quality work products that meet the needs of the City. Final Transit Network Plan, Tukwila Urban Center Subarea, Perteet, Inc., December 2004. November 11 th, 2011 Page 5. 393 IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK City of Tukwila TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASES 3 AND 4 ASSUMPTIONS Primary project management coordination will be through the Consultant Project Manager and City Project Manager. All Consultant requests for meetings with City staff shall come from the Consultant Project Manager. Such requests will be issued to the City Project Manager. All sub consultant requests for meetings will be coordinated through the Consultant Project Manager or Consultant Design Coordinator (the latter if a design related issue). Steps will be taken to schedule meetings as far ahead as reasonable to secure participation of invitees, City assistance may be requested from time -to -time to expedite design or information collection related meetings. The City will be responsible for providing meeting space and issuing invites to City staff and other stakeholders for all stakeholder and city council meetings and presentations. The City will be responsible for providing base information such as existing plans, previous studies, land surveys, GIS data, etc. The Consultant will coordinate with the City to make sure that information requests are reasonable and do not overly burden City staff. The Consultant will be responsible for all work products delivered, and commits to providing staff and resources to complete the work in a timely manner. WORK ACTIVITIES 5.1. Contract Administration This activity covers basic administration of the work including: 5.1.1. Preparation of a Project Schedule in MS Project, ongoing tracking of that schedule, and reporting of any variances on a monthly basis. Issues identified during the course of the work that have the potential to affect schedule will be promptly identified for the City Project Manager (this is in addition to regular monthly reporting). 5.1.2. Cost and project team time control. 5.1.3. Monthly invoicing and project progress reporting (report to be included with invoice). 5.1.4. Sub consultant administration. 5.2. Meetings and Coordination This includes general coordination and project management meetings; stakeholder meetings are covered in Task 6. Meeting and coordination are expected to include the following: 5.2.1. Design Review meetings with City staff (3) (At the start of 60% design, during 60% design and during 100% design tasks). 5.2.2. Internal design team coordination meetings 5.2.3. Client coordination calls and ad -hoc coordination (Up to 6). 394 November 11 th, 2011 Page 6. IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK City of Tukwila TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASES 3 AND 4 5.3. Quality Control 5.3.1.All work products will be subject to internal quality review before issuance per IBI Group quality control procedures. DELIVERABLES Project schedule Invoices and monthly progress reports Meeting agendas Meeting notes This task will continue the stakeholder coordination efforts from the work completed earlier during schematic and final design phases through the construction document phase by assisting the City with communication with key stakeholders. Key stakeholders include the City project team, King County Metro, adjacent property owners and businesses, council committees, review boards and commissions. The Consultant will prepare presentation materials as defined below. ASSUMPTIONS The City will be responsible for publicizing stakeholder meetings and for arranging meeting logistics. The Consultant will be responsible for the preparation one set of presentation materials for the City's use at stakeholder meetings. IBI will lead one (1) presentation for the Adjacent Property Owners and Tenants. Meeting notes will be prepared for the meeting. WORK ACTIVITIES 6.1. Preparation for Stakeholder Workshops 6.1.1. Stakeholder meeting agendas will be developed through collaborative planning sessions involving the City Project Manager, Consultant Project Manager, and other key staff. 6.1.2. The Consultant will prepare one set of graphics and a rendering that will be used at all of the stakeholder meetings listed above. Presentation material will be focused on the transit stations, urban design and landscape features. The graphics prepared will reflect the reviewed and approved design plans. 6.2. Documentation of Stakeholder Workshops 6.2.1. The Consultant will provide the City with copies of meeting materials and meeting notes for stakeholder events (paper and electronic). November 11th, 2011 Page 7. 395 IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK City of Tukwila TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASES 3 AND 4 6.3. Public Art Program Identification and Coordination 6.3.1. The Consultant will work with the City to incorporate public art into the project. The Consultant will coordinate the location of the art into the project site. The Consultants effort is limited to coordination of the art piece and is limited to 16 hours as identified in the fee proposal. The work does not include any additional design services or design modifications of the art to accommodate the piece into the project. Additional design and coordination services if required will be negotiated with the City prior to providing the services. DELIVERABLES One set of stakeholder meeting graphic materials and renderings Stakeholder meeting notes /documentation This task will prepare construction documents (60% and 100 design plans and specifications for landscape architecture, civil, architectural, urban design, structural, ITS /communications and electrical systems for the Northbound, Southbound and Baker Transit Stops. ASSUMPTIONS A Value Engineering Study is not included as part of this scope of work. If required, additional scope and fee will be negotiated with the City. A building permit will be required for the shelter only. The City will prepare all other permits. Information will be prepared in CSI format for Lump Sum bidding. The City will provide Division 00 and 01 sections meeting federal and state funding requirements. Detention and water quality is required for this project. The areas requiring water quality treatment and pervious and impervious area changes will be documented in a technical memo. The work required for this requirement will be combined with proposed improvements within the Andover Park West improvement project. Canopies and planter walls will be founded on conventional spread footings. The design of pile foundations would be considered additional scope. A single canopy design would be applied to all canopies at the Northbound and Southbound transit stations. Baker Blvd. transit station will not include a shelter. 100% Draft Design Plans will be utilized for the Building Permit submittal no additional plans will be prepared for the Building Permit The City will provide comments for the 60% and Draft 100% Design submittals within 2 weeks of receiving the documents. The City will provide consolidated comments that are non conflicting to the Consultant for incorporation into the next submittal. November 11th, 2011 Page 8. IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK City of Tukwila TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASES 3 AND 4 WORK ACTIVITIES 7.1. 60% Design Plans and project specifications will be prepared to a 60% design level. One design review meeting will be held during the 60% design task with key City staff. Progress design drawings will be reviewed and key design issues and decisions discussed. 7.1.1. Civil The Consultant will develop 60% design documents covering drainage facilities. The 60% design for utilities will include relocation; new utility services that may be required for project. The plans will include the following: the final grading of existing and installation of plans; pavement layout will include extent of the new pavement for bus pullouts and /or plaza areas, and will include pavement cross sections. The Consultant will also prepare 60% demolition drawings for the Firestone canopy foundations. 7.1.2. Landscape Design 60% plans for landscape design documentation will be developed for both the pedestrian plaza and transit center locations. 7.1.3. Urban Design The Consultant will develop 60% urban design project site plans and details including Transit Center, Pedestrian Plaza and Crosswalk design. 7.1.4. Architecture Design 60% design architectural documentation of planters, railing, signage, lighting, seating, plaza and shelter will be developed for the transit center. 7.1.5. Structural The Consultant will develop 60% designs for structural elements (planter walls, a single trellis, feature signs, unique light standards and a standard canopy). The structural design for the transit center will include foundation, planter wall, and framing plans and details for all sites. 7.1.6. Electrical The Consultant will develop 60% designs for site electrical power service and distribution, and receptacle locations. The Consultant will coordinate any required discussions between the City, service utility, and design team members to determine power availability and access. The Consultant will develop 60% design lighting plans and coordinate lighting system standards with the City. 7.1.7. ITS The Consultant will develop 60% designs for video surveillance cameras for the transit center. The cameras will be an expansion of the City's existing system and will not include a new operating system. The Consultant will develop 60% designs for a conduit layout for a future VMS display and connection to the Rapidride technology pylon. November 11th, 2011 Page 9. 397 IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK 7.2. 100% Design City of Tukwila TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASES 3 AND 4 Plans and project specifications will be prepared for a complete design. One design review meeting will be held during the 100% design task with key City staff. Progress design drawings will be reviewed and key design issues and decisions discussed. A draft 100% design submittal will be prepared and submitted to the City for Review. The draft 100% design documents will be utilized for the submittal of the Building Permit to the City of Tukwila. A final 100% bid ready set of plans and specifications will be prepared. This set will incorporate the final comments from the City's review and the Building Permit Review. 7.2.1. Civil The Consultant will develop 100% design documents covering drainage facilities. The 100% design for utilities will include relocation; new utility services that may be required for project. The plans will include the following: the final grading of existing and installation of plans; pavement layout will include extent of the new pavement for bus pullouts and /or plaza areas, and will include pavement cross sections. The Consultant will prepare 100% demolition drawings for the Firestone canopy foundations. 7.2.2. Landscape Design —100% plans for landscape design documentation will be developed for both the pedestrian plaza and transit center locations. 7.2.3. Urban Design The Consultant will develop 100% urban design project site plans and details including Transit Center, Pedestrian Plaza and Crosswalk design. 7.2.4. Architectural Design 100% design architectural documentation of planters, railing, signage, lighting, seating, plaza and shelter will be developed for the transit center. 7.2.5. Structural The Consultant will develop 100% design plans for foundation, planters, and shelter structure. 7.2.6. Electrical The Consultant will develop 100% design plans for site electrical power service and distribution, and receptacle locations. The Consultant will coordinate any required discussions between the City, service utility, and design team members to determine power availability and access. The Consultant will develop final design lighting plans and coordinate lighting system standards with the City. 7.2.7. ITS The Consultant will develop 100% design plans for video surveillance cameras for the transit center. The Consultant will develop final designs for a conduit layout for a future VMS display and a connection to the RapidRide technology pylon. DELIVERABLES 60% Design Plans and Specifications submittal for all disciplines Draft 100% Design Plans and Specifications submittal for all disciplines (will also be used as the submittal for Building Permit) Final 100% Design Plans and Specifications (Bid- ready) submittal for all disciplines November 11th, 2011 Page 10. Ml IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK City of Tukwila TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASES 3 AND 4 Cost estimates will be developed for the 60% and 100% submittals with a level of accuracy commensurate with the level of design. The cost estimates will include the cost of construction for the design and include any potential risks that have been identified as a result of the conceptual engineering and design tasks. The cost estimate will be subdivided into costs for each of the disciplines listed below. ASSUMPTION(S) Information will be prepared in CSI format for Lump Sum bidding WORK ACTIVITIES 8.1. 60% Cost Estimating 8.1.1. The Consultant will develop an 60% cost estimate based on the civil, landscape, urban, architectural, structural, ITS /Communications, mechanical and electrical design. 8.2. 100% Cost Estimating 8.2.1. The Consultant will develop a 100% cost estimate based on the civil, landscape, urban, architectural, structural, ITS /Communications, mechanical and electrical design. DELIVERABLE(S) Lump sum construction cost estimates for 60% and 100% documentation. Task 9: Assistance with Building Permit ASSUMPTIONS: City staff has indicated that the only City permit required will be the building permit for the station canopies. The Consultant will communicate with the City on corrections or other issues that arise during review, up to the level of effort identified in the Cost Estimate. All permit fees will be paid by the City directly and are not included in the cost estimate. The City will lead the submittal and tracking of the building permit and coordinate with the reviewers during the review and approval process. The Consultant team effort for this task is limited to 20 hours as defined in the attached fee proposal. November 11th, 2011 Page 11. IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK City of Tukwila TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASES 3 AND 4 WORK ACTIVITIES 9.1. Building Permit The Consultant team will assist the City in obtaining the building permit for the station canopies by assembling the building permit application materials which include drawings prepared for the 100% Draft Design plans and specifications. Additional drawings will not be prepared for the permit submittal. The Consultant will prepare required forms and assemble a draft application package for City review. The City will lead the submittal of the application and track the progress of the permit package through the approval process and coordinate with the Consultant Team on questions and revisions during the approval process. The Consultant team effort for this task is limited to 20 hours as defined in the attached fee proposal. DELIVERABLES Building permit application (draft, final) PHASE 5: BID AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT (OPTIONAL) ASSUMPTIONS The City will be responsible for all aspects of the procurement not spelled out specifically below. No Conformed set of documents including addenda will be prepared. DELIVERABLES The Consultant will make a "camera ready" or digital record of the Final bid documents available to the City for their use in the copying and dispersal of documents to prospective bidders. The Consultant will respond to bidder questions forwarded by the City with Addenda information in the form of text and drawings necessary and appropriate to obtain bids. Task 11: Construction Support ASSUMPTIONS The City will retain personnel as required to manage the day -to -day administration of the construction. No budget is included for this work. Final Budget and Scope will be determined at a later date. DELIVERABLES Review and comment on submittals Review and comment on requests for information November 11th, 2011 Page 12. W1 IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK Review and respond to owner questions City of Tukwila TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASES 3 AND 4 Issue clarifications, including supplemental drawings Maintain a log of all submittals, requests for information, owner questions, supplemental drawings and issued clarifications The consultants will make site visits to review progress SCHEDULE AND FEE The Consultant team will conduct the work described in Phase 4 Construction Documents in an overall timeline of six months with two additional 2 week periods for City review of the design deliverables after 60% and 100% draft design. The additional services work for Phase 3 described in this document will be conducted simultaneously with the Phase 4 tasks and will continue as described to completion of the acquisition tasks. A definitive timeline for this work cannot be estimated; however, the work will be coordinated with the City and regular status reports will be provided. CLS sub contracting of the WSDOT- approved appraiser has been included at an estimated maximum cost of $5,000; however, this is going out to bid per Task 3.3 so this cost is not exact. The estimated fee for the Phases 3 and 4 work is summarized below: Phase 3 Additional Services and Phase 4: Construction Documents $429,000 Phase 5: Bid and Construction Support TBD Additional Services not included in this Scope of Work Hazardous Materials November 11th, 2011 $16,386 Page 13. 401 p N N M M K w 00 0000 000 0� o00 oo oo° N a w N R a U J a a a 3 N op N o00 0 0000 000 00!��°,ry b N o n N -.!o 0 0 0 00 0000 000 0 000o a a w oo�'�o o owo M r O L yy O N.r wN 2 vN �o °N V N M U Y ILL la y i O D OOO 0 000 O o 0 00 000 0 p yi»N Q a W J N f N O M w O n N 9 G e 'm LLz a O N L N o a e mM O "c 'oU_ x m° m j9a �`o= �`o da oaf° L°Eo a F a ul O'vQ 2Ti $U' u od �u l w a N��vA "°AVM 2g 3 w, Q N n N i0 b b m Qi m EXHIBIT O LL x a� k m N KIM Transportation Committee Minutes November 21. 2011— Pape 2 Statewide Transportation Enhancement Program. This is Washington State Department of Transportation Grant in the amount of $500,000. The City applied for the grant in July 2010, and was awarded funding in 2011. No matching funds are required. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. D. Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge: Supplemental Agreement No. 9 with KPFF Staff is seeking Council approval for Supplemental Agreement No. 9 of Contract No. 07 -123 with KPFF Consulting Engineers in the amount of $1,367,580.11 to: Complete design and environmental permitting for the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Design of a new pedestrian signal across West Valley Highway Trail design connecting bridge users to the Tukwila Longacres Sounder Station Design along Baker Boulevard to add bike lanes and on- street parking KPFF conducted the Type, Size and Location (TSL) study and resulting report for the Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge. Funding for the Supplemental Agreement will come from the grants described in Item C above, including matching funds. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. E. Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Supplemental Agreement No. 13 with IBI Group Staff is seeking Council approval for Supplemental Agreement No. 13 with the IBI Group for completion of the final design and PS &E documents for the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center in the amount of $429,000. Funding for this Supplemental Agreement will come from the TOD grant and the WSDOT Regional Mobility grant. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. F. Andover Park West Street Water Improvements Supplement No. 14 with IBI Group Staff is seeking Council approval for Supplemental Agreement No. 14 with the IBI Group for completion of the final design and PS &E documents for the Andover Park West widening and water main replacement in the amount of $313,037 (widening $167,693 water main $145,344). Funding for this Supplemental Agreement will come from mitigation and traffic impact fees. The City was recently awarded $1,420.000 in grant funds for construction from the State Transportation Improvement Board. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. G. Ordinance: Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Staff is seeking Council approval to acquire property /condemnation authority as required for right -of -way and easements need for the Tukwila Urban Transit Center Project as follows: One right -of -way dedication Three temporary construction easements One permanent easement It is standard for City staff to request condemnation authority at the beginning of a property acquisition process for public projects. Although it is highly unlikely that any parcel of land within this area will require condemnation, establishing the ordinance prepares the City for condemnation proceedings, if required. Four parcels with three separate owners are included in the project area. The agenda packet provides specific details on ownership. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. 403 M COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS CAS NUMBER: AGENDA ITEM TITLE CATEGORY Discussion Initials Meeting Date Prepared 6y Mayo; s review 11/28/11 I B I ""k 12/05/11 I B I I I ITEM INFORMATION STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON Council review t� ITEM NO. 4.N. ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 11/2 Andover Park West Street Improvements Consultant Supplemental Agreement No. 14 with IBI Group Motion Resolution Ordinance BidAwatd Public Hearing Other Mtg Date 11/28/11 Mtg Date 12/05/11 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date (SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P &R Police Plr SPONSOR'S This supplemental agreement will complete the final design of the Andover Park West SUMMARY street improvements as well as the design of the APW water main replacement. Combining these two projects with the Transit Center into one design and construction project will reduce costs. With the State TIB grant of $1.42 million, the project is funded and scheduled to begin construction in 2012. Council is being asked to approve Supplemental Agreement No. 14 in the amount $313,037.00. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 11/21/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: JOAN HERNANDEZ RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. Public Works COMMTITEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $313,037.00 $530,000.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREETS &401 WATER (NEW PAGE 17 AND 89, PROPOSED 2012 CIP) Comments: $167,693000 for APWStreet and $145,344.00 for APW New Water Main MTG. DATE 11/28/11 12/05/11 MTG. DATE 11/28/11 12/05/11 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION ATTACHMENTS Informational Memorandum dated 11/18/11 New page 17 and 89, Proposed 2012 CIP Supplemental Agreement No. 14 with IBI Group Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 11/21/11 405 E1. City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Transportation Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director DATE: November 18, 2011 SUBJECT: Andover Park West Project No. 98810404, Contract 06 -019 Supplemental Agreement No. 14 ISSUE Supplement to the IBI Group on the combined Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center design and Andover Park West in the amount of $313,037.00. BACKGROUND In August 2011, the City modified the agreement with IBI Group to add in the design of the Andover Park W water main replacement to the previously existing contract to design the Andover Park W widening project. Combining these design efforts is a prudent use of public funds, intended to capitalize on related work, much as the Andover Park W widening project was combined with the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center design work. All three projects are logically interconnected. Design of the road widening and the water main replacement is currently at 30 DISCUSSION This supplemental scope of work adds new scope and fee associated with final design and PS &E for the Andover Park W widening and water main replacement projects. Design work associated with the road widening and water main replacement has been separated for project accounting. Fiscal Impact: Supplement No. 14's fee amount associated with the Andover Park W Widening Project is $167,693.00 and the fee for the Andover Park W Water Main Replacement project is $145,344.00 for a total supplement amount of $313,037.00. New CIP pages are attached to represent the funds needed for design in 2012, with right -of way costs reduced (page 17 and 89, Proposed 2012 CIP). This project is dependent on successful grant funding of $1,420,000.00. Results from the State Transportation Improvement Board will be released Friday, November 18, 2011, so an update will be given at the November 21 Transportation Committee on the status of the grant funding. RECOMMENDATION Approve Supplement No. 14 to Contract No. 06 -019 with the IBI Group in the amount of $313,037.00 and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole and subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular meetings. Attachments: Page 17 and 89, Proposed 2012 CIP Supplemental Agreement #14 WAPW Eng \PROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects \06RW02 Transit Center \INFO MEMO Supp #14 IBI APW Water Design 11- 18- 11.docx 407 K1: CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY FUND SOURCES Awarded TIB Grant 355 1,065 Proposed Grant Mitigation Actual 316 Impact Fees 101 5 City Oper. Revenue (340) 5 444 253 0 0 0 0 TOTAL SOURCES 77 10 799 1,318 0 0 0 0 Project Location 2012 2017 Capital Improvement Program 0 0 n GIS 1,420 0 316 106 362 2,204 17 409 2012 to 2017 PROJECT: Andover Park West (Tukwila Pkwy Strander Blvd) Project No. 98810404 Zone 1 DESCRIPTION: Study and implement revised channelization. JUSTIFICATION: Revising left turn lanes will reduce accidents and lessen congestion. Major portion of Andover Park W at intersections are complete. Next phase is to revise turn lanes along STATUS: length of project. To be coordinated with Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center and APW water improvements. MAINT.IMPACT: Negligible. Project is on impact fee list and goal is to begin project by 2011. Design report completed in 1991 was updated COMMENT: in 2009. ACME Bowling mitigation of $111 k and Westfield Mall of $205k in 2007. Received State TIB grant of $1.42m. Partial match from APW water overlay for $346k (see page 89). FINANCIAL Through Estimated (in $000's) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 BEYOND TOTAL EXPENSES Design 77 10 278 365 Land(R/W) 80 80 Const. Mgmt. 41 122 163 Construction 400 1,196 1,596 TOTAL EXPENSES 77 10 799 1,318 0 0 0 0 0 2,204 FUND SOURCES Awarded TIB Grant 355 1,065 Proposed Grant Mitigation Actual 316 Impact Fees 101 5 City Oper. Revenue (340) 5 444 253 0 0 0 0 TOTAL SOURCES 77 10 799 1,318 0 0 0 0 Project Location 2012 2017 Capital Improvement Program 0 0 n GIS 1,420 0 316 106 362 2,204 17 409 CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY 2012 to 2017 PROJECT: Andover Park W /Strander New Water Main Project No. 99840105 DESCRIPTION: Design and construct 2,100 LF of a 12" pipe along Andover Park West from Tukwila Pkwy to Strander Blvd JUSTIFICATION: Aging cast iron pipe and deficiencies under fire flow conditions. STATUS: Coordinated with the Transit Center and Andover Park West street improvements MAINT. IMPACT: Improved service would reduce maintenance liability. COMMENT: FINANCIAL Through Estimated (in $000's) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 BEYOND TOTAL EXPENSES Design N ee 165 L A 165 Land (R/W) W# E Sflmn 0 Const. Mgmt. 177 177 Construction 1,212 1,212 TOTAL EXPENSES 0 0 1,554 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,554 FUND SOURCES Awarded Grant 0 Proposed Grant 0 Mitigation Actual 0 Mitigation Expected 0 Utility Revenue 0 0 1,554 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,554 TOTAL SOURCES 0 0 1,554 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,554 Project Location -7 y GIs ollia 410 2012 2017 Capital Improvement Program 89 Y rcc�ur m 9 6 N ee UPI-d D. L A Mltllfl tl Dr W# E Sflmn r� rmflntl Dr s, S sieos GIs ollia 410 2012 2017 Capital Improvement Program 89 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NUMBER 14 TO CONSULTANT AGREEMENT NUMBER 06 -019 THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, Washington, herein -after referred to as "the City and IBI Groum hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified. The City desires to supplement the agreement entered into with the Consultant and executed on, February 23, 2006 and identified as Agreement No. 06 -019. All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Scope of Services, is hereby changed to include work described in Exhibit A for additional design work on the Andover Park West project. 2. Payment, shall be amended as follows: A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit B attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed $313,037 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. The maximum amount payable under this agreement as supplemented inclusive of all fees and other costs is now $1,534,852. 3. Time for Performance, shall be amended as follows: The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement by December 31, 2012, unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City. DATED this day of 20 CITY OF TUKWILA Jim Haggerton, Mayor CONSULTANT By: Printed Name: Title: 411 412 City of Tukwila ANDOVER PARK WEST IMP_ ROVEMENTS PHASE 2: FINAL DESIGN ANNAMMM IBI GROUP 413 IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK PHASE2: FINAL DESIGN 1 Task 9: Project Management.... 1 Task 10: Stakeholder Coordination 2 Task 11: Construction Documents (60% and 100 3 Task12: Cost Estimates (60% and 100%). 5 PHASE 3: BID AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT OPTIONAL) 5 Task13: Bid Support 5 Task14: Construction Support...... 6 SCHEDULEAND FEE 6 November 11, 2011 414 Page i IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK City of Tukwila ANDOVER PARK WEST IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 2: FINAL DESIGN PHASE 2: FINAL DESIGN The objective of this Phase of the project is to develop final design documents (60% and 100 for Andover Park West improvements that provide design documentation, cost information and environmental and geotechnical information to the City that allows for future bidding of the project. A work breakdown structure of five primary tasks has been developed for this Phase of the work, covering in general: 1. Conduct and management of the work. 2. Preparation of stakeholder presentation materials and meeting summaries and participation at meetings. 3. Review and assembly of relevant information and investigation, including geotechnical and environmental appropriate to completing the design phase of the project. 4. Preparation of construction documents (60% and 100 plans and specifications Construction cost estimate for Andover Park West Improvements (60% and 100 The following scope describes the work to be conducted, assumptions and deliverables to be provided. Task 9: Project Management This task includes the day -to -day activities to be performed by the Consultant to manage and administer the work and deliver quality work products that meet the needs of the City. ASSUMPTION(S) Primary project management coordination will be through the Consultant Project Manager and City Project Manager. All Consultant requests for meetings with City staff shall come from the Consultant Project Manager. Such requests will be issued to the City Project Manager. All sub consultant requests for meetings will be coordinated through the Consultant Project Manager or Consultant Design Coordinator (the latter if a design related issue). Steps will be taken to schedule meetings as far ahead as reasonable to secure participation of invitees, City assistance may be requested from time -to -time to expedite design or information collection related meetings. The City will be responsible for providing meeting space and issuing invites to City staff and other stakeholders for all stakeholder and city council meetings and presentations. The Consultant will be responsible for all work products delivered, and commits to providing staff and resources to complete the work in a timely manner. November 11, 2011 IBI GROUP 415 IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK WORK ACTIVITIES 9.1 Contract Administration This activity covers basic administration of the work including: 9.1.1 Preparation of a Project Schedule in MS Project, ongoing tracking of that schedule, and reporting of any variances on a monthly basis. Issues identified during the course of the work that have the potential to affect schedule will be promptly identified for the City Project Manager (this is in addition to regular monthly reporting). 9.1.2 Cost and staff time control. 9.1.3 Monthly client invoicing and project progress reporting (report to be included with invoice). 9.1.4 Sub consultant administration. 9.2 Meetings and Coordination This includes general coordination and project management meetings. Meeting and coordination are expected to include the following, with the number of required meetings determined when the overall schedule has been developed: 9.2.1 Monthly meetings with City staff. 9.2.2 Internal design team coordination meetings. 9.2.3 Bi- weekly client coordination calls and ad -hoc coordination. 9.3 Quality Control 9.3.1 All work products will be subject to internal quality review before issuance per IBI Group quality control procedures. DELIVERABLES Project schedule Invoices and monthly progress reports Meeting agendas Meeting notes Task 10: Stakeholder Coordination This task will continue the Stakeholder coordination efforts through final design by assisting the City with communication with key stakeholders. Key stakeholders include the City project team, council committees, review boards and commissions and adjacent property owners. In each case, the Consultant will prepare one set of presentation materials for all stakeholder workshops and generate notes /documentation of the outcomes. ASSUMPTION(S) The City will be responsible for publicizing stakeholder meetings and for arranging meeting logistics. The Consultant will be responsible for producing one set of stakeholder meeting presentation materials, and for producing meeting notes for the stakeholder meeting. November 11, 2011 Page 2 M IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK WORK ACTIVITIES 10.1 Preparation for Stakeholder Workshops 10.1.1 Stakeholder meeting agendas will be developed through collaborative planning sessions involving the City Project Manager, Consultant Project Manager, and other key staff. 10.1.2The Consultant will prepare one set of graphics and a rendering for the stakeholder meetings. The graphics prepared will reflect the Draft Final Design. 10.2 Documentation of Stakeholder Workshops 10.2.1 The Consultant will provide the City with copies of meeting materials and meeting notes for all stakeholder events (paper and electronic). DELIVERABLE(S) One set of stakeholder meeting graphic materials and rendering. Stakeholder meeting notes /documentation. Task 11: Construction Documents (60% and 100 This task will include the design development (60 and final (100 design plans and specifications for civil, urban design, landscape architecture, ITS /communications and electrical systems. ASSUMPTION(S) A Value Engineering Study is not anticipated as part of the work. Per conversations with the City, the previously scoped Phase 1 B work that included sewer line improvements is no longer required. This work has been removed from this phase of the scope and fee. Information will be prepared in CSI format for Lump Sum bidding. City shall provide Contract boilerplate, and Divisions 0, and 1, and all City General Special Provisions in this format. Proposed contours are not included for the Plans. All grading information will be conveyed with typical section and control line profile. Storm water runoff assessment and report will be based upon 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual and will follow requirements of the City. Stormwater assessment shall include areas disturbed with the Tukwila Transit Center project. Water quality and detention facilities, if required, will be designed to address needs for both projects. City shall lead public outreach effort to coordinate utility service transfer issues with all adjacent properties. Structural design and layout of retaining walls for roadway excavation is not included within this work. Waterline improvement plan details will include only special details necessary for the work. City and State standard plans are not included within the planset. City and State standard plans will be referenced only within the Plans. Contract specifications may include City and State standard plans within appendix. November 11, 2011 Page 3 417 IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK WORK ACTIVITIES 11.1 Civil 11.1.1 The Consultant will develop final design documents covering drainage facilities. Work includes storm drainage technical report showing tributary areas and calculations for required detention and water quality. Report will loosely follow King County report format, but will be abridged, and will not include assessment of downstream analysis, offsite analysis, Construction stormwater pollution prevention worksheet forms, dedication and indemnification clause, bond quantities, or any covenants or easements. 11.1.2The final design for utilities will include relocation and new utility services that may be required for project. These include both public utilities being disturbed as well as private utilities requiring relocation. 11.1.3The final design for roadway improvements for widening to accommodate five (5) lanes and two -inch asphalt grind and overlay, including design of grading and pavement markings for the speed table at the intersection with Baker. Plans include removal plan, typical sections paving plans, channelization plans and temporary erosion control plans. 11.1.4Waterline Design: the Consultant shall develop final plans from schematic water main design to replace the existing eight -inch waterline with a 12 -inch waterline. The design shall include proposed service connections to existing services, fire hydrant placement, service connections, and other necessary appurtenances. The design shall include critical construction staging sequences. Plans shall include plan and profile, and miscellaneous detail sheets as necessary. Work shall also include cost estimate and contract specifications. 11.1.5 Sewer Line: this work is no longer required and has been removed from this project. 11.2 Landscape Design 11.2.1 Final landscape design documentation will be developed for the roadway. 11.3 Urban Design 11.3.1 The Consultant will develop final urban design project site plans and details including for the Streetscape Design for Andover Park West. 11.4 Electrical 11.4.1 The Consultant will develop final designs for site electrical power service and distribution, and receptacle locations. The Consultant will coordinate any required discussions between the City, service utility, and design team members to determine power availability and access. 11.4.2The Consultant will develop a final design lighting plans and coordinate lighting system standards with the City. 11.5 ITS /Signals 11.5.1 The Consultant will develop final designs for communication system requirements to maintain the existing signalized intersections and provide for future ITS requirements through installation of conduit. November 11. 2011 Page 4 i l IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK DELIVERABLE(S) Design Development (60 documentation submittal for all disciplines. Buoyancy calculations shall be included under separate cover. Final Design (100 ready- for -bid design documentation submittal for all disciplines. Cost estimates will be developed for the 60% and 100% submittals with a level of accuracy commensurate with the level of design. The cost estimates will include the cost of construction for the design and include any potential risks that have been identified as a result of the conceptual engineering and design tasks. The cost estimate will be subdivided into costs for each of the disciplines listed below. ASSUMPTIONS) Information will be prepared in CSI format for Lump Sum bidding. WORK ACTIVITIES 12.1 60% Cost Estimating 12.1.1 The Consultant will develop a 60% cost estimate based on the civil, landscape, urban, ITS /Communications, mechanical and electrical design. 12.2 100% Cost Estimating 12.2.1 The Consultant will develop a 100% cost estimate based on the civil, landscape, urban, ITS /Communications /Signals, and electrical design. DELIVERABLE(S) Lump sum construction cost estimates for 60% and 100% documentation. PHASE 3: BID AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT (OPTIONAL) Task 13: Bid Support ASSUMPTIONS) The City will be responsible for all aspects of the procurement not spelled out specifically below. No Conformed set of documents (including addenda) will be prepared. No budget is included for this work. Final Budget and Scope will be determined at a later date. DELIVERABLE(S) 13.1 The Consultant will make a "camera ready" or digital record of the Final bid documents available to the City for their use in the copying and dispersal of documents to prospective bidders. 13.2 The Consultant will respond to bidder questions forwarded by the City with Addenda information in the form of text and drawings necessary and appropriate to obtain bids. November 11, 2011 Page 5 419 IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK ASSUMPTION(S) The City will retain personnel as required to manage the day to day administration of the construction. No budget is included for this work. Final Budget and Scope will be determined at a later date. DELIVERABLE(S) 14.1 The Consultant shall provide the following: Review and comment on submittals. Review and comment on requests for information. Review and respond to owner questions. Issue clarifications, including supplemental drawings. Maintain a log of all submittals, requests for information, owner questions, supplemental drawings and issued clarifications. The consultants will make site visits to review progress. SCHEDULE AND FEE Phase 2 work will begin upon completion of Phases 1A and 1 B. Phase 3 work will be refined during Phase 2 work and finalized with the City prior to the development of a fee proposal. In order to meet strict City budgeting requirements, this work will be split into two discrete budgets for the roadway improvements and waterline replacement. These efforts will be shown clearly on invoicing under the correct City budget line items. The fee for the project has been prepared for the tasks outlined in this document for Phase 2. The estimated fee for the work is summarized below: Phase 2 Roadway Improvements: Phase 2 Waterline Replacement November 11, 2011 $167,693 $145,344 Page 6 I EXHIBIT m H N d LL Y S O Q P r fA fA O O H r W W m I-- 7 5 r a O O 0 000 0 00 000 oP, oo 't r I M MM im O N p O Os t0 M 1A y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C LL N O O c C R L O- U m U c 0 co Ol° o p 0 CD d O K a H J F c K F r c a H O O O N L 0 c c l0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m N m I-- 7 5 r a O O 0 000 0 00 000 oP, oo 't r I W w Q Q t0 N O O w 0 co MM im O N x c y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O c C R L O- 0 0 0 0 W w Q Q t0 N a a 0 r� N O X K N N d m CL 3 N 421 O O w 0 co O f O O N W i0 O O c0 O O N Oi Oi N N to tN O O- m m F- c o N L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m N o N v v m U m m O N o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O t0 �O O N to 7 (H /A LL LL LL LL N d Y d 7 M o- N Q N N N w c) CO N N Q O O o 0 m 0 m M 6 N O m N N N 6 O _E T d C7 O F p g o F c ca o o 0 3 d o y w h a a v R a o L Y o a O O m L a o C cn y V O e t0 y U R W O C O p y U O C O o c d m N m y n a LL a` a c n E E o d° p m a) o o a s a>Nm 1 d cz m� o 0 E U o n`o p O E E� O o C L N .G O O O O O C N' N N w O U O y C 0 K Q a w W L Q O O m> 4) 0 c m d) O n N m v w f o ci t' O m 0 2 Q C- t 4 D N C (n j U c a 7 N Z d p N 3• Y N O C N N (n NR H O O u) C C O CL f L) C7 �A„ d 4 o D Lu f' p f0 (p 9 LL m p U N a N v V N M m N U Q Lu N Cl) O O O r Lt1 M r a� a a 0 r� N O X K N N d m CL 3 N 421 f_ ca LU EXHIBIT T) O Y at O O r q N IL l�6 N h U Y Y o j tY t L p O O 00 00 p U. U F N N _�z.. O O O lA M 1A I OO O O 1p N 1 N 11 O O O O U a c 1m m oti lYE vLL N M V O A fi N rnigo? MOOp 0 sstt v o 0 o m 1 cJ •y d O O Q N co 00 co O r M I— I C7 m d Q A R x 9 G 3 E oN �m A IL m p N Im a� C i 3 r'n n a G N n O O Q N 3 a a N d V N O y, ;.O ryI 7 O L H O C N m a o� m ,I m C o o r LL. 7 Y m ti N N a dR I° 7 Yi6 m o c tY N ,IE �m E 2 a O N C p aLLD; Gm o O c t$ G �W W U C G 3 u N m o£ c v o o G d N m E N o g G m d N vs u, v@ o y o E 4� O u rn "y, t Q% of o m E I E 0 w u LL' a o Ul c c V itl Lk N y O w m O M a N O M O N c N O N N a 4 m N Transportation Committee Minutes November2l, 2011 —Paae2 Statewide Transportation Enhancement Program. This is Washington State Department of Transportation Grant in the amount of $500,000. The City applied for the grant in July 2010, and was awarded funding in 2011. No matching funds are required. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. D. Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridle: Supplemental Agreement No. 9 with KPFF Staff is seeking Council approval for Supplemental Agreement No. 9 of Contract No. 07 -123 with KPFF Consulting Engineers in the amount of $1,367,580.11 to: Complete design and environmental permitting for the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Design of a new pedestrian signal across West Valley Highway Trail design connecting bridge users to the Tukwila Longacres Sounder Station Design along Baker Boulevard to add bike lanes and on- street parking KPFF conducted the Type, Size and Location (TSL) study and resulting report for the Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge. Funding for the Supplemental Agreement will come from the grants described in Item C above, including matching funds. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. E. Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Supplemental Agreement No. 13 with IBI Group Staff is seeking Council approval for Supplemental Agreement No. 13 with the IBI Group for completion of the final design and PS &E documents for the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center in the amount of $429,000. Funding for this Supplemental Agreement will come from the TOD grant and the WSDOT Regional Mobility grant. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. F. Andover Park West Street Water Improvements Supplement No. 14 with IBI Grout) Staff is seeking Council approval for Supplemental Agreement No. 14 with the IBI Group for completion of the final design and PS &E documents for the Andover Park West widening and water main replacement in the amount of $313,037 (widening $167,693 water main $145,344). Funding for this Supplemental Agreement will come from mitigation and traffic impact fees. The City was recently awarded $1,420.000 in grant funds for construction from the State Transportation Improvement Board. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. G. Ordinance: Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Staff is seeking Council approval to acquire property /condemnation authority as required for right -of -way and easements need for the Tukwila Urban Transit Center Project as follows: One right -of -way dedication Three temporary construction easements One permanent easement It is standard for City staff to request condemnation authority at the beginning of a property acquisition process for public projects. Although it is highly unlikely that any parcel of land within this area will require condemnation, establishing the ordinance prepares the City for condemnation proceedings, if required. Four parcels with three separate owners are included in the project area. The agenda packet provides specific details on ownership. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. 423 424 CO UNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials ITEM NO. Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor's review Council review 11/28/11 BG 1 WXC 12/05/11 BG 4.0. ITEM INFORMATION CAS NUMBER: STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON ORIGINA], AGENDA DATE: 11/28/11 AGENDA ITEMTITI-r_. Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Ordinance for Acquisition of Right -of -Way, Permanent Easements, and Temporary Construction Easements CATEGORY N Discussion Motion Resolution N Ordinance .Bid Award Public Hearing ❑Other Mtg Date 11/28/11 Mt g Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 12/05/11 Mt Date Mtg Date Mtg Date SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal PAR E] Police N PW SPONSOR'S The final design of the Transit Center is underway and construction is scheduled to begin in SUMMARY 2012. This Ordinance provides the authority to acquire the needed property for the Transit Center and includes acquisition of right -of -way, permanent easements, and temporary construction easements. Four parcels are being impacted. Council is being asked to approve the Ordinance authorizing acquisition of the properties for the Transit Center. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte N Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 11/21/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR .LOAN HERNANDEZ RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Public Works COM.MI1 "T17B Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREETS (NEW PAGE 16, PROPOSED 2012 CIP) Comments: MTG. DATE 11/28/11 12/05/11 I MTG. DATE 11/28/11 12/05/11 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION ATTACHMENTS Informational Memorandum dated 11/18/11 Draft Ordinance with Exhibits Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 11/21/11 425 426 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: FROM DATE: Mayor Haggerton Transportation Committee Bob Giberson, Public Works Director 4-W November 18, 2011 SUBJECT: Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center, Project No. 90610402 Ordinance for Acquisition of Right -of -Way, Permanent Easements and Temporary Construction Easements ISSUE Approve Ordinance to acquire property for the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Project. DISCUSSION Final design for Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center is underway. Right -of -way is needed along the project in order to construct the proposed improvements. A permanent easement from Westfield Mall is necessary and the parking variance granted to Westfield covers most of the easement area. Some additional easement area is required to allow for the fully expanded Transit Center. Four temporary construction easements and one dedication of right -of -way are also necessary. The project is scheduled for advertisement in mid -2012 in accordance with the Transit Mobility Grant, once the right -of -way (ROW) is secured. The details are shown in the following table with approximate property square footage: Parcel Nos. 'Owners Parcel G, BSP Temporary Permanent ROW Required; Construction Easement Easement (SF) Required (sf) Required (sf) #L10 -032 :WEA Southcenter (Firestone 1,817 Parcels A G, BSP #L10 -032 ;WEA Southcenter 6,119 18,318 0226100010 :Open Frame, LLC (Calif Pizza) ......_s ......................6 ,429 2,121 0223100075 OB Fife Property Il, LLC (Acura) 891 The attached ordinance provides the authority to acquire the needed property. As with previous projects that have involved acquiring additional property, the City will do everything within its power to work cooperatively with the property owners. However, should the City not be successful in these efforts, condemnation of the property would be required. Letters have been mailed to the owners notifying them of this potential condemnation and the Council's schedule for ordinance approval. RECOMMENDATION Approve Ordinance authorizing acquisition of the properties for completion of the TUC Transit Center and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole and subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular meetings. Attachment: Ordinance with legal descriptions and maps WAPW Eng \PROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects \06RW02 Transit Center \INFO MEMO ROW Ordinance 11- 18- 11.docx 427 El PSI 1"Al AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ACQUISITION OF INTERESTS IN LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPLETING THE TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR CONDEMNATION, APPROPRIATION, TAKING OF LAND AND PROPERTY RIGHTS NECESSARY THEREFORE; PROVIDING FOR PAYMENT THEREOF, AND DIRECTING THE INITIATION OF APPROPRIATE PROCEEDINGS IN THE MANNER PROVIDED BY LAW FOR SAID CONDEMNATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on December 6, 2010, the City Council adopted the 2011 -2016 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), by Resolution No. 1730; and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2005, the City Council amended the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan, by Ordinance No. 2108, which included the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Project as a high priority project necessary to provide quality transit service and complement adjacent land uses; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found that the public health, safety, necessity and convenience demand that said project be undertaken at this time and that in order to carry out the project it is necessary at this time for the City to acquire interests and rights to the properties described herein; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and declares it necessary and in the best interest of the public that interests in the land and property rights hereinafter described be condemned, appropriated, and taken for public use, subject to the making or paying of just compensation to the owners thereof in the manner provided by law; and WHEREAS, notice of the planned final action was handled in accordance with RCW 8.25.290 to include publication in "The Seattle Times" and "Daily Journal of Commerce" on November 21 and November 28, 2011; W: Word Processing \Ordinances\Aquisition of land- Transit Center project 11 -16 -11 SK:bjs Page 1 of 3 429 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The land and property rights within the City of Tukwila, King County, Washington, commonly known as a portion of Andover Park West near Baker Boulevard and further described in the attached Exhibits A through D, are necessary for construction of the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Project described above, subject to making or paying just compensation to the owners thereof in the manner provided by law. Section 2. The City of Tukwila specifically finds construction of the project to be a public use, specifically the lengthening of the existing bus pull -out on the west side of Andover Park West, widening a portion of Andover Park West to accommodate a new bus pull -out, and construction of an improved on- street transit center including the improvement or installation of custom bus shelters, street furniture, pedestrian plazas, and the related construction or addition of curb, gutter and sidewalk, signalization, illumination, landscaping, irrigation, storm drainage and storm detention. The City Council specifically finds construction of the project to be necessary and in the best interests of the citizens. Section 3. The cost and expense of acquiring said property rights shall be paid from the 2011 -2013 Regional Mobility Grant awarded to the City of Tukwila by the Washington State Department of Transportation, from general funds of the City of Tukwila, and from other monies applicable thereto that the City may have available or may obtain. The Director of the Public Works Department or his designee is hereby authorized to negotiate with and make offers to the owners of said land or property for the purposes of making or paying just compensation, and to approve the payment of just compensation as negotiated with said owners or as ordered by the Court. Section 4. In the absence of negotiated purchases with the affected property owners, the City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to undertake proceedings provided by law to condemn, appropriate, and take the property necessary to carry out the provisions of this ordinance. The City Attorney is further authorized to approve and enter into any and all such agreements, stipulations, and orders necessary to carry out the provisions of this ordinance, including for the payment of just compensation as agreed to with the property owners or as ordered by the Court. Section 5. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering and section /subsection numbering. Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such W: Word Processing \Ordinances\Aquisition of land- Transit Center project 11 -16 -11 SK:bjs Page 2 of 3 BU invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2011. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A Jim Haggerton, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: Andover Park West Right -of -Way Take Legal Description and Map Northbound Transit Temporary Construction Easement Legal Description and Map Exhibit B Southbound Transit Easement Legal Description Southbound Transit Center Temporary Construction Easement Legal Description and Map (2 pages) Exhibit C Canopy Easement Legal Description and Map Exhibit D Temporary Construction Easement Legal Description and Map W: Word Processing \Ordinances\Nquisition of land- Transit Center project 11 -16 -11 SK:bjs Page 3 of 3 431 432 EXHIBIT A City of Tukwila Tax Parcel No. 0223 1000010 Andover Park West Right of Way Take That portion of Lot 2 of City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment No. L05 -025, recorded under Recording No. 20050928900006, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 2; Thence South 00° 11'38" East, along the west line thereof and the east margin of Andover Park West, a distance of 12.04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing along said east margin through the following courses: South 00 °11'38" East a distance of 23.21 feet; Thence South 89 °48'22" West a distance of 5.50 feet; Thence South 009 1'38" East a distance of 250.50 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the northeast and having a radius of 50.00 feet; Thence southeasterly along the are of said curve through a central angle of 55 °28'55" a distance of 48.42 feet; Thence leaving said east margin, North 00 °11'38" West a distance of 314.91 feet; Thence South 89 °48'22" West a distance of 16.17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington, The above described easement areas contain 6,429 square feet, more or less. B Al. L A1 PAP09 \09603.13 Final Design \docs\IBI Tukwila APW Right of Way Take.doc 433 EXHIBIT MAP I PAR 0 223100020 TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER NW COR. LOT 2 ANDOVER PARK WEST POB P L35 RIGHT OF WAY TAKE CONC. DR. o) PARCEL 0223100010 LINE TABLE LINE I BEARING I LENGTH h L34 S00'11'38 "E1 12.04 L351 S89'48'22 "Wi 16.17 L36 S00'1 1'38 "E 1 23.21 mo o, L371 S89'48'22 "Wi 5.50 P Q-� CURVE TABLE i CURVE i LENGTH i RADIUS i DELTA C211 48.421 50.001 55'28'55" ASPH. B LDG. AREA OF RIGHT OF WAY TAKE a f7 U q .q Y F FEUk� 1 i BAKER 589 "E BL VD. 11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300 Kirkland, WA 98033 p. 425.827.2014 1 f. 425.827.5043 SCALE: 1" 50' PACE FILE: D ATE: /11 B T FW Civil I Structural I Planning I Survey DATE: O NO.: BY: FW PROJ. N0.:09603.13 An Engineering Services Company paceengrs.com 434 EXHIBIT MAP TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER ANDOVER PARK WEST RIGHT OF WAY TAKE I CURVE TABLE I I CURVE I LENGTH RADIUS 1 DELTA I C211 48.42 50.001 55 AREA OF RIGHT OF WAY TAKE nlh It r I PAR 0223100020 I_NW COR. LOT 2 POB— 1 ;L35'� CONC. DR. 137 PARCEL 0223100010 LA O O i M Z O x/� C i ASPH. BLDG. CONC 1 I I BAKER S89'42'31 "E BL VD. 11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300 Kirkland, WA 98033 p. 425.827.2014 I f. 425.827.5043 SCALE: t" T 50' PACE FILE: DATE: /11 B FW Civil Structural Planning Survey DATE: 11 /16/11 BY: FW An Engineering Services Company paceengrs.com PROJ. NO.: 09603.13 435 LINE TABLE LINE BEARING LENGTH L34 S00'1 1'38 "E 12.04 L351 S89'48'22 "W I 16.17 L361 S00'11'38 "E1 23.21 L371 S89'48'22 "WI 5.50 I CURVE TABLE I I CURVE I LENGTH RADIUS 1 DELTA I C211 48.42 50.001 55 AREA OF RIGHT OF WAY TAKE nlh It r I PAR 0223100020 I_NW COR. LOT 2 POB— 1 ;L35'� CONC. DR. 137 PARCEL 0223100010 LA O O i M Z O x/� C i ASPH. BLDG. CONC 1 I I BAKER S89'42'31 "E BL VD. 11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300 Kirkland, WA 98033 p. 425.827.2014 I f. 425.827.5043 SCALE: t" T 50' PACE FILE: DATE: /11 B FW Civil Structural Planning Survey DATE: 11 /16/11 BY: FW An Engineering Services Company paceengrs.com PROJ. NO.: 09603.13 435 City of Tukwila Tax. Parcel No. 02231000010 Northbound Transit Temporary Construction Easement. Description That portion of Lot 2 of City of Tukwila Boundary Line AdjIustnient No. L05 -025, recorded under Recording No. 20050928900006, records of K ing County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 2; Thence South 00 °I 1'38" East, along the west line thereof and the east margin of Andover Park West, a distance of 12.04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the easement herein described; Thence North 89 °48'22" East:, at right angles to said east margin, a distance of 16.1.7 .feet; Thence South 00 °11'38" East, parallel with the west line of said Lot 2 and east margin of Andover Park West a distance of 31.4.91 feet to the south line of said Lot 2, and the beginning of a non- tangent curve concave to the northeast from which the radius point bears North 34'19'27" East a distance of 50.00 feet; Thence southeasterly along the arc of. said curve through a central angle of 32 °45'54" a distance of 28.59 feet; Thence North 00 °.1.7'29" East a distance of 20.00 feet; Thence North 89 °42'31 West, parallel with said south line of Lot 2 a distance of 3.39 feet to the beginning: of a tangent curve concave to the northeast and having a radius of 30.00 feet; Thence northwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 38 °24'04" a distance of 20.1.1. feet; Thence North 00 °11'38" West, parallel with said west line of Lot 2 and east margin of Andover Park West, a distance of 302.03 feet; Thence South 89 °48'22" West, at right angles to said west line, a distance of 21.17 feet to said west line of said Lot 2 and east margin of Andover Park West; Thence South 00 °11'38" East, along said west line and east margin a distance. of 5.00 feet tothe POINT OF BEGINNING. Situate in the City of Tukwila, Countv of King, State of Washington, The above described easement areas contain 2;121 square feet, more or less. 32 P:\1 \09603.13 Final Desigu\docsUl `Ilukivila Northbound Transit Tcmp Esint.doc M EXHIBIT MAP I PAR 0223100020 TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER I A �—N COR. LOT 2 NORTHBOUND TEMPORARY L35 CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT I L CONC. DR. LINE TABLE PARCEL 0223100010 Zt LINE BEARING I LENGTH I 5.00' L341 SOO 11'38 "E 1 12.041 U) L351 S89'48'22 "W I 16.171 o L361 S00 11'38 "E 1 23.211 I l L37 S89'48'22 "WI 5.501 o L38 S89'48'22 "W I 21.171 L391 N89 "W I 3.391 I N y��'+ L401 N00 17'29 "E 1 20.001 I 1 o 0� �q'_ i m CURVE TABLE I CURVE I LENGTH I RADIUS I DELTA 1 1 C211 48.421 50.001 55 "1 I y Ct y /W/4 C221 20.111 30.001 38 C231 28.591 50.001 32 ASPH. y BLDG. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AREA DETAIL 1---- 20_ CONC 1 I I 10 I SEE DETAIL Q J 1 OPPOSITE BAKER BL J BLVD. 11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300 Kirkland, WA 98033 p. 425.827.20141 f, 425.827.5043 SCALE: 1" 50' rPA�E FILE: D EASEMENT /11 B FW Civil 1 Structural 1 Planning (Survey DATE: O NO.: BY: FW An Engineering Services Company paceengrs.com PROJ. N0.:09603.13 437 Ml EXHIBIT B City of Tukwila Parcel A and G— Binding Site Plan #L 10 -032 Tax Parcel No. 9202470010 and 9202470070 Southbound Transit Easement Description That portion of Parcels A and G of City of Tukwila Binding Site Improvement Plan No. L10 -032, recorded in volume 256 of Plats, Pages 1 through 9, under Recording No. 20101021000765, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Parcel G; Thence North 00 °11'38" West along the east line of said Parcels G and A, and the west margin of Andover Park West, a distance of 288.32 feet, Thence South 89 °46'20" West a distance of 29.76 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the south and having a radius of 125.00 feet; Thence westerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 3 °47'32" a distance of 8.27 feet; Thence South 009 1'3 8" East a distance of 14.75 feet to the beginning of a non tangent curve concave to the south from which the center point bears South 05 0 48'17" East a distance of 95.00 feet; Thence westerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 27'43'16" a distance of 45.96 feet; Thence South 33 °53'21" East a distance of 35.87 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the northeast and having a radius of 8.00 feet; Thence southeasterly along the are of said curve through a central angle of 56 0 20'23" a distance of 7.87 feet; Thence North 89 0 46'16" East a distance of 18.79 feet; Thence South 00 0 04'14" East a distance of 219.23 feet; Thence South 00'19'53" East a distance of 163.62 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the east and having a radius of 8.25 feet; Thence southerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 44 °07'53" a distance of 6.35 feet to the beginning of a compound curve concave to the north and having a radius of 13.00 feet; Thence easterly along the are of said curve through a central angle of 48 °2727" a distance of 10.99 feet; Thence North 89 °48'22" East a distance of 23.40 feet to the east line of said Parcel A and west margin of Andover Park West; Thence North 00'11'38" West along said east line of Parcels A and G and west margin of Andover Park West, a distance of 167.81 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Together with that portion of said Parcel A described as follows: Commencing at northeast corner of said Parcel G; Thence North 00° 11'38" West along the east lines of said Parcels G and A and said west margin of Andover Park West, a distance of 317.54 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the easement area herein described; Thence continuing North 00 °11'38" West along said east line of Parcel A and west margin, a distance of 36.26 feet; Thence North 89'10'47" West a distance of 29.17 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the southeast and having a radius of 1.80 feet; Thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 88 °21'16" a distance of 2.78 feet; Thence South 02 °27'57" West a distance of 17.42 feet; Thence South 00 °46'46" West a distance of 17.67 feet; PAP09 \09603.13 Final Design \does \IBI Tukwila Southbound Transit Easement.doc 439 '['hence North 89'48'22" East a distance of 32.11 feet: to the :POINT OF BEGINNING; Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington The above described easement areas contain 18.3 18 syuat'e feet, nun'e ut' Ies5. v V PiT09 \09603.13 Final Design \does \B[ -Tukwila Southbound Transit Easement.doc M City of Tukwila Parcel A and G Binding Site Plan #L10 -032 Tax Parcel No. 9202470010 and 9202470070 Southbound Transit Center Temporary Construction Easement Description That portion of Parcels A and G of City of Tukwila Binding Site Improvement Plan No. L10 -032, recorded in volume 256 of Plats, Pages 1 through 9, under Recording No. 20101021000765, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Parcel G; Thence North 00 °11'38" West along the east line of said Parcels G and A, and the west margin of Andover Park West, a distance of 288.32 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the easement herein described; Thence South 89 °46'20" West a distance of 29.76 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the south and having a radius of 125.00 feet; Thence westerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 3 °47'32" a distance of 8.27 feet; Thence South 00 °11'38" East a distance of 14.75 feet to the beginning of a non tangent curve concave to the south from which the center point bears South 05'48'17 East a distance of 95.00 feet; Thence westerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 27 a distance of 45.96 feet; Thence South 33 °53'21" East a distance of 35.87 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the northeast and having a radius of 8.00 feet; Thence southeasterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 56 °20'23" a distance of 7.87 feet; Thence North 89'46'16" East a distance of 18.79 feet; Thence South 00'04'14" East a distance of 219.23 feet; Thence South 00'19'53" East a distance of 163.62 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the east and having a radius of 8.25 feet; Thence southerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 44 °07'53" a distance of 6.35 feet to the beginning of a compound curve concave to the north and having a radius of 13.00 feet; Thence easterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 48 °27'27" a distance of 10.99 feet; Thence North 89 °48'22" East a distance of 23.40 feet to said west margin of Andover Park West; Thence South 00 °11'38" East along said west margin a distance of 5.00'; South 89 °48'22" West a distance of 23.40 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the northeast and having a radius of 18.00 feet; Thence northwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 48 °27'27" a distance of 15.22 feet to the beginning of a compound curve having a radius of 13.25 feet; Thence northerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 44 °07'53" a distance of 10.21 feet Feet; Thence North 00 °19'53" West a distance of 6.27 feet; Thence South 89 °40'07" West a distance of 4.00 feet; Thence North 00 °19'53" West a distance of 15.88 feet; Thence North 89 °40'07" East a distance of 4.00 feet; Thence North 00 °19'53" West a distance of 112.51 feet; Thence South 90 °00'00" West a distance of 13.00 feet; Thence North 00 West a distance of 243.16 feet to the beginning of a non tangent curve concave to the northeast from which the radius point bears North 00 °13'44" West a distance of 13.00 feet; Thence northwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 56 °20'23" a distance of 12.78 feet; PAP09 \09603.13 Final Design \docs\IBI Tukwila Southbound Temp Easement.doc 441 Thence no.r heasterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 2800'04" a distance of 411.87 feet; Thence North 00'11 '38" West a distance of 14.60 feet to the beginning of a non tangent curve concave to the south from which tile center point bears South 07 °28'49" East a distance of 130.00 feet; Thence easterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 5 °48'36" a distance of 13.18 feet; Thence North 89 °46'20" East a distance of 29.76 feet to said west margilt..of Andover Park West; Thence South 00° 1 1'38" .F.,ast „along said west margin, a distance of 5:00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Together with that portion of said Parcel. A. described as follows; Commencing at northeast corner of said Parcel G.; Thence North 009 1.'3 8” West along the cast lines of said Parcels G and A and said west margin of Andover Park West, a distance of 353.80 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the easement area herein described; Thence North 8990'47" West a distance of 29.17 feet to the beginning. of a tangent curve concave to the southeast and having a radius of 1.80 feet; Thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 88 °21'16" a distance of 2.78 feet; Thence South 02 °27'57" West a distance of 17.42 feet; Thence South 00 °46'46" West a distance of 17.67 feet; Thence North 89 °48'22" East a distance of.32.11 feet to said west margin of Andover Park West; Thence South 00°11'38" East along said west margin a distance of 5.00 feet; Thence South 89 °48'22" West a distance of 37.1.9 feet; Thence North 00 °46'46" East a distance of 22.75 feet; Thence North 02 °27'57" East a distance of 17.42 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the southeast and having a. radius of 6.80 feet; Thence southwesterly along the are of said curve through a central angle of 88 °21'16" a distance of 10.49 feet; Thence South 8.9" 10'47" East a distance of 29.08 feet to said west margin of Andover Park West; Thence South 009 1'38" East along said west margin a distance of 5.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Situate in. the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington, The above described easement areas contain 6,809 square feet, more or less. P'U \09603.13 Final DesignWocsllBI -Tukwila Southbound Temp Easement.doc i i A 32429 P'U \09603.13 Final DesignWocsllBI -Tukwila Southbound Temp Easement.doc i i A PAGE 1 EXHIBIT MAP TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER EASEMENT WESTFIELD PARCEL CONTINUED ON PAGE 2 LINE TABLE I M LINE I BEARING I LENGTH 1 L21 S00'11'38 "E1 14.751 N L3 S33'53'21 "E I 35.87 CC o/ o� q r2 L41 N89'46'16 "EI 18.791 L71 N00'11'38 "W1 36.261 W L81 N89'10'47 "W I 29.171 L91 S02'27'57 "W I 17.421 UZ- c �x I a I L101 S00'46'46 "W 1 17.671 1 L121 S89'46'20 "W I 29.761 Q- I L131 N89'48'22 "EI 23.401 L14 N89'48'22 "E 32.111 L151 N89'46'20 "E I 29.761 E L161 N00'1 1'38 "W I 14.601 30' I L171 N33'53'21 "WI 40.781 301 L18 S89'46'16 "WI 13.771 L19 S89'59'26 "WI 12.011 EL G L 2� AREA L20I SOD'00'00 "E 1 21.871 PRG 1 L211 N89'59'37 "El 3.66 P 5.0' TYP. I L221 SO4'20'21 "EI 63.36 L231 S00'00'34 "W I 53.58 f N co L241 590'00'00 "W I 13.00 w 1 L251 N89'40'07 "E 1 4.00 00 L261 N00'19'53 "W I 15.88 N� N l l I I t j L271 S89'40'07 "WI 4.00 L281 N00'19'53 "W I 6.27 0 L291 589'48'22 "WI 23.40 Z 1 L301 S89'1 0'47 "E 1 29.081 1 Q L311 NO2'27'57 "E 1 17.42 1 0 Z L321 S00'46'46 "WI 22.75 a QC I L331 S89'48'22 "WI 37.19 0 L ',o 1 'I N Q SEE PAGE 2 FOR CURVE TABLE Q L2 Z N L i/ C7 TRANSIT EASEMENT PA RCEL CI8- L2 TEMPORARY. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT C8 I I 30.00 11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300 Kirkland, WA 98033 rP ACE p. 425.827.20141 f. 425.827.5043 Civil I Structural I Planning I Survey An Engineering Services Company paceengrs.com SCALE: 1" 50' FILE: \EASEMENT EXHIBIT.DWG DATE: 11/15/11 BY: FW PROJ. NO.: 09603,13 443 EXHIBIT MAP TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER EASEMENT WESTFIELD PARCEL LEGEND: HORIZONTAL DATUM CITY OF TUKWILA BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN NO. L10 -032 NEW TRANSIT EASEMENT HATCHED AREAS BSIP PARCEL LINES CENTERLINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE 11l a C20 A .J J C14ti PAGE 2 30.00 i4.50'— 1 -L7 POB NORTHI AREA BAKER 30.00' L 30.00 ",I:\ to l 04 col c, I Q �Z7 CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 r PACE 112 55 Kirkland Way, Suite 300 Kirkland, WA 98033 p. 425.827.20141 f. 425.827.5043 v 11 Structural P,. lanning ...nin- g-- 1 1 1 P Survey An Engineering Services Company paceengrs.com SCALE: 1" 50' FILE: \EASEMENT EXHIBIT.DWG DATE: 11/15/11 BY: FW PROJ. NO.: 09603.13 CURVE TABLE I CURVE I LENGTH I RADIUS I DELTA 1 C31 45.961 95.001 27'43'16" I C4 7.87 8.001 56'20'23 "1 C7 6.35 8.251 44'07'53 "1 C81 10.991 13.001 48 C111 2.781 1.801 88'21'16 "1 C141 8.271 125.001 3'47'32 "1 C151 13.181 130.001 5 C161 48.871 100-001 28'00'04" 1 C171 12.781 13.001 56'20'23 "1 C181 10.211 13.251 44 C191 15.221 18.001 48 C201 10.491 6.801 88 LEGEND: HORIZONTAL DATUM CITY OF TUKWILA BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN NO. L10 -032 NEW TRANSIT EASEMENT HATCHED AREAS BSIP PARCEL LINES CENTERLINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE 11l a C20 A .J J C14ti PAGE 2 30.00 i4.50'— 1 -L7 POB NORTHI AREA BAKER 30.00' L 30.00 ",I:\ to l 04 col c, I Q �Z7 CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 r PACE 112 55 Kirkland Way, Suite 300 Kirkland, WA 98033 p. 425.827.20141 f. 425.827.5043 v 11 Structural P,. lanning ...nin- g-- 1 1 1 P Survey An Engineering Services Company paceengrs.com SCALE: 1" 50' FILE: \EASEMENT EXHIBIT.DWG DATE: 11/15/11 BY: FW PROJ. NO.: 09603.13 EXHIBIT C City of Tukwila Parcels A and G Binding Site Plan #1,10 -032 Tax Parcel No.'s 9202470010 and 9202470070 Canopy Easement Description That portion of Parcels A and G of City of Tukwila Binding Site Improvement Plan No. 1,10 -032 recorded in volume 256 of Plats, Pages 1 through 9, under Recording No. 2010 [021000765, records of King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Parcel G; Thence South 00 °11'38" East along the east line thereof and the west margin of Andover Park. West a distance of 42.73 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence continuing South 00 °11'38" East along said west margin a distance of 68.17 .feet; Thence North 89 54'34" West a distance of 62.85 feet; Thence North 00 1.9'59" East a distance of 68.15 feet; Thence South 89 56'07" East a distance of 62.27 feet; to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington, The above described easement areas contain 4,264 square feet, more or less PAP09t09603.13 Final Design[ mIJBI -Tukwila Canopy EasementIdoc 445 EXHIBIT MAP FIRESTONE CANOPY EASEMENT PARCEL G BSIP L10 -032 I NE COR. PARCEL G j CANOPY 1 N89'56'07 "W 62.27' �II 7 r POB W 0 0 o �I N lO ww rn o 56'31" o C'm 45.00' 0 ,y 2.31' Z 11 z f J 1 N89'54'34 "W 62.85 I' PARCEL G WEA SOUTHCEN 30 00' I a N M w 00 0 0 Ln LLC BSIP L 249/77 -84 30. )0' PARC A LEGEND: HORIZONTAL DATUM CITY OF TUKWILA BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN NO. L10 -032 NEW CANOPY EASEMENT HATCHED AREA W W O Q i i Ij i i i i BSIP PARCEL LINES CENTERLINE RIGHT OF WAY LINE SCALE: 1" 30' rPACE DATE: 11/15/11 BY: FW An Engineering Services Company PROJ. NO.: 09603.13 11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300 Kirkland, WA 98033 p. 425.827.2014 1 f. 425.827.5043 Civil I Structural I Planning I Survey paceengrs.com iii EXHIBIT D City of Tukwila Tax Parcel No. 0223100075 Temporary Construction Easement Description That portion of Tract 7, Andover Industrial .Park No. 2, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 71 of Plats, Page 68, in King County, Washington, lying north of a line drawn parallel with the south line of Baker Boulevard, and 459 feet south thereof, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of said parcel; Thence North 00° l 1.'38" West, along the west line of said parcel and east margin of Andover Park West, a distance of 396.59 feet; Thence North 89 48'22" East, at right angles to said east .margin, a distance of 10.00 feet to the east line of an existing 10.00 wide easement as shown on said plat, and the POINT O.F .BEGINNING of the easement herein described; Thence continuing North 89 °48'22" East a distance of 5.00 :feet; Thence North 00 l 1'38" West, parallel with said margin, a distance of 12.69 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the southeast and having a radius of 35.00 .f.'eet; Thence northeasterly along.the are of said curve through a central angle of 90 °29'07" a distance of 55.27 feet; Thence.South 89 42'31" East, parallel with the south margin of said Baker Street,, a distance of 106.48 feet; "Thence North 00 °17'29" East, at right angle to the south line of said Balser Street, a distance of 5.00 feet to the south line of said existing easement; Thence along said easement line, and parallel with said south and east margins, through the following courses: North 89°42'31" West a distance of 106.4.8 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the southeast and having a radius of 40.00 feet; Thence southwesterly along the are of said curve through a central angle of 90 0 29'07" a distance of 63.17 feet; Thence South 00 °11'38" East a distance of 12.69 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of ling, State of Washington, The above described easement areas contain 891 square feet, More or less. PATIM09603.13 Final Design\does \1131 Tukwila Temporary Construction Esmt.doc 447 EXHIBIT MAP TUKWILA TRANSIT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT o BAKER o S89 "E BLVD. o =so 29'07" 'g x=40.00' o L= 63.17' M 30.00' 106.48' N00'17'29 "E A =90'29 07 I I 0 5.00' POB -1 R= 35.00' vi L= 55.27' UJI i 2.69' 9 I PARCEL 02231000751 30.00 ICI' 5 822 E 00' Z 3 N89 "E 10.00' 0 M m EXISTING 0 0 EASEMENT Zt a, o PER PLAT I I� Q Z CAR LOT SW CORNER tx z.-- PARCEL SCALE: 1 50' FILE: \EASEMENT EXHIBIT.DWG DATE: 11/11/11 BY: FW PROJ. NO.: 09603.13 11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300 Kirkland, WA 98033 PACE p. 425.827.2014 I f. 425.827 Civil I Structural I Planning I Survey An Engineering Services Company paceengrs.com i i Transportation Committee Minutes November 21, 2011— Pape 2 Statewide Transportation Enhancement Program. This is Washington State Department of Transportation Grant in the amount of $500,000. The City applied for the grant in July 2010, and was awarded funding in 2011. No matching funds are required. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. D. Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian Bicvcle Bridge: Supplemental Agreement No. 9 with KPFF Staff is seeking Council approval for Supplemental Agreement No. 9 of Contract No. 07 -123 with KPFF Consulting Engineers in the amount of $1,367,580.11 to: Complete design and environmental permitting for the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Design of a new pedestrian signal across West Valley Highway Trail design connecting bridge users to the Tukwila Longacres Sounder Station Design along Baker Boulevard to add bike lanes and on- street parking KPFF conducted the Type, Size and Location (TSL) study and resulting report for the Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge. Funding for the Supplemental Agreement will come from the grants described in Item C above, including matching funds. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. E. Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Supplemental Agreement No. 13 with IBI Grout') Staff is seeking Council approval for Supplemental Agreement No. 13 with the IBI Group for completion of the final design and PS &E documents for the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center in the amount of $429,000. Funding for this Supplemental Agreement will come from the TOD grant and the WSDOT Regional Mobility grant. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. F. Andover Park West Street Water Improvements Supplement No. 14 with IBI Group Staff is seeking Council approval for Supplemental Agreement No. 14 with the IBI Group for completion of the final design and PS &E documents for the Andover Park West widening and water main replacement in the amount of $313,037 (widening $167,693 water main $145,344). Funding for this Supplemental Agreement will come from mitigation and traffic impact fees. The City was recently awarded $1,420.000 in grant funds for construction from the State Transportation Improvement Board. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. G. Ordinance: Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Staff is seeking Council approval to acquire property /condemnation authority as required for right -of -way and easements need for the Tukwila Urban Transit Center Project as follows: One right -of -way dedication N I--,' Three temporary construction easements One permanent easement It is standard for City staff to request condemnation authority at the beginning of a property acquisition process for public projects. Although it is highly unlikely that any parcel of land within this area will require condemnation, establishing the ordinance prepares the City for condemnation proceedings, if required. Four parcels with three separate owners are included in the project area. The agenda packet provides specific details on ownership. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. M e I COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS CAS NUMBER: AGENDA ITEM TI "TLE Initials Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor's review 11/28/11 I BG ��&1f 12/05/11 B r ITEM INFORMATION STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON Cote ITEM NO. ORI G INA], AGENDA DATE-: 11/28/11 Tukwila Urban Center Access (Klickitat) Right -of -Way Transfer between WSDOT and Tukwila CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other Mtg Date 11 /28 /11 Alt Date 12/05/11 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance .Fire Legal PAR Police PIT/ SPONSOR'S With the completion of the TUC Access (Klickitat) Project, the Southcenter Parkway right SUMMARY of -way needs to be ultimately turned back to Tukwila for maintenance responsibilities. First, we must convey the ROW to WSDOT by Quit Claim Deed, which includes an after acquired title clause (for ROW originally conveyed from Westfield Mall). Second, WSDOT will adjust the limited access line and convey the entire ROW back to Tukwila by means of the Turnback Agreement. RI= w1EWED 13Y COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 11/21/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: JOAN HERNANDEZ RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Public Works C0M1\II "1 "TEFs Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDI"I'URE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREETS (PAGE 13, PROPOSED 2012 CIP) Conmwnts: MTG. DATE 1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 11/28/11 12/05/11 MTG. DATE 1 ATTACHMENTS 11/28/11 Informational Memorandum dated 11/18/11 Letter of Understanding dated 4/5/10 Quit Claim Deed with After Acquired Title Clause from Tukwila to WSDOT Turnback Agreement from WSDOT to Tukwila Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 11/21/11 12/05/11 451 452 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Transportation Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director DATE: November 18, 2011 SUBJECT: Tukwila Urban Center Access (Klickitat) Project Project No. 98410419 ROW Transfer between Washington State Department of Transportation WSDOT) and Tukwila ISSUE Conveyance of Right -of -Way (ROW) to WSDOT and subsequent acceptance of ROW Turnback to Tukwila. BACKGROUND In April 2010, a Letter of Understanding (LOU) was signed by both Tukwila and WSDOT, which outlined the process of how both agencies were intending to transfer ROW ownership and adjust the limited access lines along Southcenter Parkway for the Klickitat Project. There are three components related to the LOU: 1) Tukwila is to convey a portion of the ROW dedicated by Westfield to WSDOT. 2) WSDOT will relocate the limited access lines from their current location to include the ROW conveyed by Tukwila. 3) WSDOT will then convey back to Tukwila all of the underlying ROW. Southcenter Parkway will then be under the City of Tukwila's ROW for maintenance responsibilities. DISCUSSION The ROW dedication was conveyed to Tukwila from Westfield in June 2009 using one of the City's standard processes, a Right -of -Way Dedication. It was our understanding that a Warranty Deed would convey the ROW to WSDOT. WSDOT is unwilling to accept a Warranty Deed from the City as conveyance for the Westfield dedication since it was conveyed to Tukwila through a Right -of -Way Dedication. Instead, WSDOT is requesting that the City execute a Quit Claim Deed to convey the property. Staff and the City Attorney have been negotiating with WSDOT on the manner to best achieve this property transfer. WSDOT and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) have indicated concurrence with this approach. The first step is to convey the necessary ROW to WSDOT using a Quit Claim Deed, including an after acquired title clause. Council is being asked to authorize the Mayor to sign the Quit Claim Deed. The City Attorney will be requesting Westfield to re- convey their ROW dedication using a Quit Claim Deed. It is this step that necessitates the after acquired title clause. In the second step, WSDOT will adjust the limited access line to include the property conveyed to WSDOT by Tukwila. After this adjustment is executed, WSDOT will convey the entire ROW width on Southcenter Pkwy back to Tukwila. The Council is being asked to authorize the Mayor to accept the ROW Turnback Agreement (as part of step 3). RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to authorize the Mayor to sign the Quit Claim Deed to convey the ROW to WSDOT and also authorize the Mayor to accept the ROW Turnback Agreement from WSDOT and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole and subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular Meeting. Attachments: Letter of Understanding dated April 5, 2010 Quit Claim Deed with After Acquired Title Clause from Tukwila to WSDOT Turnback Agreement from WSDOT to Tukwila W: \PW Eng \PROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects \98410419 TUC Access (Klickitat) \INFORMATION MEMO -ROW Transfer 11- 15- 11.docx 453 454 L aty of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tubvila, lashington 98188 Jirn Haggenon, Mayor April 5, 2010 Russell S. East, P.E. Assistant Regional Administrator for SnoKing Washington State Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Ave N, NB82 -101 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133 -9710 RE: Tukwila Urban Access Improvement Project Letter of Understanding Dear Mr. East: Negotiations between the Washington State Department of Transportation WSDOT) and the City of Tukwila (CITY) around the Tukwila Urban Access Improvement Project (PROJECT) have been ongoing since 2005. Those discussions have resulted in this Letter of Understanding (LOU). It is agreed by all parties that the following conditions, obligations, and requirements shall apply, and that each party is bound by the following: Issue The CITY has taken lead on a roadway design project predominately along Southcenter Parkway. While a portion of the PROJECT falls under Limited Access control, the larger corridor functions as a CITY street. The CITY has acquired all necessary right -of -way (ROW) for the PROJECT; all new ROW is currently under CITY ownership. The CITY has been coordinating with WSDOT for the PROJECT design and is working toward finalization of the design and advertising the PROJECT for construction. The CITY has acquired the funding for the PROJECT design and construction from multiple sources including CITY funds, federal and local grants, and private funds. No WSDOT funds have been committed to the PROJECT. Several of the grants awarded to the PROJECT are time sensitive and could be revoked by the granting agency should the PROJECT be unreasonably delayed. It is in the best interest of both the CITY and WSDOT to work cooperatively to complete the PROJECT as it is mutually beneficial to both agencies. WSDOT Responsibilities 1. WSDOT will work with the Federal Highways Administration (FHWA) to gain approval of the Limited Access deviation. 2. WSDOT agrees to accept conveyance of ROW from the CITY for the portion Southcenter Parkway which is currently CITY-owned ROW (see attached ROW Exhibit). art of the ROW conveyance and Certification, WSDOT agrees to relocate the Limited Access delineation 455 Letter of Understanding Tukwila Urban Access Improvement Project Limited Access March 31, 2010 Page 2 of 2 to the easterly side of the Southcenter Parkway ROW. The CITY and WSDOT agree there is no meaningful benefit at this time as part of this project to extending the Limited Access control further north or south than the existing north/south boundaries along Southcenter Parkway. 3. Upon PROJECT close -out, as defined by the CITY's acceptance and close -out of the PROJECT, WSDOT agrees to turn -back VaIO �VAZ_ wnership of Southcenter Parkway to the, CI TY through a Turn -Back Agreement a K c 6 l R o w W4 �J 4. WSDOT agrees that all transactions agreed upon as part of this LOU is done so without any exchange of cash or any other item of tangible value, other than the mutual benefits achieved through the PROJECT. 5. WSDOT agrees to continue working with the CITY on all remaining design issues, to be detailed in a separate Letter of Understanding. CITY Resnonsibilities 1. The CITY will submit documentation for the deviation of standard Limited Access requirements for WSDOT and FHWA approval. 2. The CITY will convey to WSDOT that portion of the ROW which will be incorporated into the revised Limited Access area as described above. The CITY will submit appropriate documentation for the conveyance of ROW and the revision to the Limited Access area as part of the normal ROW Certification process for the PROJECT. 3. The CITY agrees to continue all normal maintenance activities within the PROJECT area, exclusive of the interstate facilities, through PROJECT close -out. 4. The CITY agrees to accept the ROW turn -back from WSDOT at PROJECT close -out. 5. The CITY agrees that all transactions agreed upon as part of this LOU is done so without any exchange of cash or any other item of tangible value, other than the mutual benefits achieved through the PROJECT. 6. The CITY agrees to continue finalizing the project design to incorporate the remaining design issues verbally agreed upon, the details of which will be documented in a separate Letter of Understanding. By signing the spaced provided below, the CITY and WSDOT acknowledge and agree to the terms and commitments outlined above. Concurrence by: Bob Giberson, P.E. Public Works Director City of Tukwila Concurrence by: Russell S. East, P.E. Assistant Regional Administrator SnoKing WSDOT Date: 4 /�s/ 0 456 r l;? if L F• is Zg Q 1 it it 1 1 ±-4 z N t° u 1 m r 1•' 1 a t y I ��1 ��1 1 1 r 1 1� vuiV .a u 11 J C i� x f 0• 3 W v a z M N t— Q. y O fi W e l t o Q yy O Se N AFTER RECORDING, PLEASE RETURN TO: City Clerk City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 QUIT CLAIM DEED Grantor: City of Tukwila, a Washington municipal corporation Grantee: State of Washington, Department of Transportation Document Reference Number(s): N/A Section/Township/Range: SEC. 26, T 23 N, R 4 E W.M. Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(s): Property Legal Description (abbreviated): Ptn. of NE 1 /4 of NW 1 /4 of Sec. 26; and Ptn. of SE I /4 of SW' /4 of Sec. 23, Twp. 23 N, R4 E W.M. Additional Legal: Attached hereto as Exhibit A The GRANTOR, City of Tukwila, a Washington municipal corporation, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO /100 ($10.00) DOLLARS, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the parties, hereby conveys and quitclaims to the State of Washington, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, Grantee, the real property situated in King County, State of Washington and legally described in Exhibit "A" and shown in "Exhibits B -1 and B -2," herewith attached and made a part hereof, and any after acquired interest therein. It is understood and agreed that delivery of this deed is hereby tendered and that the terms and obligations hereof shall not become binding upon the State of Washington unless and until accepted and approved hereon in writing for the State of Washington, by and through its Department of Transportation, by its authorized agent. Page 1 of 5 459 DATED this day of 2011. GRANTOR: CITY OF TUKWILA Mayor Attest/Authenticated: City Clerk STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. County of King Approved as to Form by: City Attorney On this day of 2011, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Jim Haggerton, known to me to be the Mayor of CITY OF TUKWILA, the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged it to be the free and voluntary act of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year above written. NAME: (Print Name) Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at My Commission Expires: [THIS PART INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] Page 2 of 5 U- �0 DATED this day of 2011. GRANTEE: STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSORTATION Accepted and Approved STATE OF WASHINGTON Department of Transportation IC Real Estate Services Program Administrator Page 3 of 5 461 Exhibit A That portion of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 26, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, and of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, and of the Interurban Addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington, and in Brookvale Garden Tracts, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 47, in King County, Washington, and of the W.H. Gilliam Donation Land Claim No. 40, lying between the existing limited access line of State Route 5 and the following described line: Commencing at the intersection of Southcenter Parkway and Strander Boulevard (S 164 Street) monumented with a 2 inch brass cap in a monument case; thence along the monumented centerline of Strander Boulevard South 88 °08'47 "East 431.28 feet; Thence North 01'51' 13" East 30.00 feet to a point on the northerly right of way margin of Strander Boulevard; Thence North 81 °07'29" West 76.22 feet; Thence North 86 °28'41" West 108.58 feet; Thence North 88 °10'49" West 135.10 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right with a radius 35.31 feet; Thence following said curve in a northerly direction through a central angle of 88 °28'02" 54.52 feet; Thence North 00° 17' 13" East 18 1.9 8 feet; Thence North 89 °42'47" West 38.84 feet, to the intersection with the existing limited access line of SR 5, said intersection being at Highway Engineer's Station Lw 2525 +08.60 and 455.08 feet right, on the Lw line survey shown on plan sheet 18 of 26 of SR 405, SR 5 Interchange Vic., approved September 16, 2005, said intersection also being the point of beginning; Thence South 89 °42'47" East 38.84 feet, to the east line of Southcenter Parkway as dedicated by deed recorded under recording number 20090720001730 in King County Records; Thence along said deed line the following courses, North 00'17'13" East 141.51 feet; Thence North 02 °55'32" East 67.60 feet; Thence North 00 °06'34" West 177.97 feet; Thence North 02 °24'31" West 177.98 feet; Thence North 02 °42'27" West 130.20 feet; Page 4 of 5 E.i Thence North 01'00'12" West 130.19 feet; Thence North 26 °33'54" East 42.44 feet; Thence North 8710'22" East 4.06 feet; Thence North 01 19'12" East 61.64 feet; Thence North 859 9'l 0" West 3.43 feet; Thence North 43 °05'40" West 17.49 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right with a radius of 19.10 feet; Thence following said curve in a northerly direction through a central angle of 45 °26'46" 15.15 feet; Thence North 02 °21'06" East 72.93 feet; Thence leaving said deed line, North 87 °38'54 "West 13.40 feet, to an angle point in the existing limited access line of SR 5, said angle point being at Highway Engineer's Station Lw 2535 +53.16 and 515.05 feet right, on the Lw line survey shown on plan sheet 20 of 26 of SR 405, SR 5 Interchange Vic., approved September 16, 2005, said point also being the terminus; Also, the Grantor herein conveys and grants to the State of Washington all rights of ingress and egress (including all existing, future or potential easement of access, light, view and air) to, from and between SR 405, SR 5 Interchange Vic. and the remainder of said Property legally described in Exhibit C. The lands herein described, the specific details concerning all of which are to be found on sheets 18 and 20 of that certain plan entitled SR 405, SR 5 Interchange Vic., now of record and on file in the office of the Secretary of Transportation at Olympia, and bearing date of approval September 16, 2005, and as revised. Page 5 of 5 463 M. E N89'03'25"W 17,04' N89'03'25 "W 46,24' -NOl 37'31"E 42;04' CORPORATION 4841V41"E 10:03' INC. N 22,78' 6= 44' R=32.40' TL# 115720 -0250 L=25.18' 100 50 0 100 SC ALE C 'LE IN.. FEET Nuz lei Ub L /Z.1 6=45'26' N2'12`46"E 177A R=19�10' 7', 1 ll� WESTFIELD TO SECTION LINE L=15.15' CORPORATION. N43'05'40"'Wl 7 49' INC. N85'19 1 0"W .3,43 61.64` LU 48710'22'E 4.06' N26'3Y54"E 42.44' N01 *001 2*W-1 ol NEW DEDICATED N �n LIMITED ACCESS ARE'A SEE SHEET 1 FILENAME: LIMITED, ACcEss.bw(G CITY OF WKWILA PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY LIMITED ACCESS,.DEDICATTION EXHIBIT SCALE: 1'=100' JOB# 05725.13 DATE:., 04/02/10 :SHEET 2 OF 2 465 EXHIBIT B MAP SEE SHEET 2_ FILENAME: LIMITED ACCESS.DWG I DATE: 04/02/10 SHEET 1 OF ,2 TL# 537920 -0240 1\102'42'27 "W 130.20'. WESTFIELD CORPORATION INC. NO2'24'311'`W 177.98' NEw- DEDICATED LIMITED .ACCESS AREA j in o; N00'06'34 "W 177: 0' I! o: 6", NO2'56'32 E 67:60' ,6 AR LINE TLS( 537920= 0241. TPOS I V N00'17'1.3 "E 139.58' WESTFIELD CORPORATION C. N 589 09'07 "E 38.91' S89 09 07 "E' r. u 40.00' w 0 w DEDICATED 12r RIGHT -OF -WAY Zo 100 5.0 0 1 O0 uj I w I I Z SCALE IN FEET !_T 588'08'47 "E o STRANDER BLVD; 1 36' 42.5' MONUMENT CM of TuxwIIIA PUBLIC ti'VORKS DEPT.' SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY PAC E- LIMITED ACCESS DEDICATION EXHIBIT SCALE: 1 =100' JOB$ 05725,13 E•- Amk Washington State Department of Transportation TURNBACK AGREEMENT Agreement Number: TB 1 -0215 State Route Control Section Region SR 405 1743 NWR Organization and Address: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Section/Location: SR 405 SR 5 Interchange Vicinity Tukwila Urban Access Improvement This Agreement is between the STATE OF WASHINGTON, Department of Transportation, hereinafter the "STATE," and the CITY OF TUKWILA, hereinafter the "CITY," collectively hereinafter the "PARTIES." WHEREAS, the CITY, proposed to design and construct the Tukwila Urban Access Improvement Project, hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT and WHEREAS, a portion of the PROJECT on Southcenter Parkway falls within the STATE owned limited access right -of -way, and WHEREAS, the PARTIES agree the PROJECT is mutually beneficial to both, and WHEREAS, the PARTIES entered into a Letter of Understanding last dated April 15, 2010, as attached hereto in full as Exhibit B, and made a part hereof, to establish the conditions, obligations, and requirements of each PARTIES responsibilities to complete the PROJECT, and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Letter of Understanding, the reconstructed state route and city street, hereinafter referred to as the "Roadway Facilities shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto and made part hereof, will be transferred from the STATE to the CITY, and WHEREAS, the STATE and CITY enter into this Agreement to identify the process of Roadway Facilities and right -of -way operation, maintenance, and ownership transfer, NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to RCW 47.52.210, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. TRANSFER OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Page 1 of 3 467 1.1 The CITY agrees upon execution of this Agreement, to accept the responsibility for the maintenance and operation of the Roadway Facilities and right -of -way, as shown on Exhibit A until such time as the full ownership of the right -of -way and Roadway Facilities are conveyed by deed pursuant to Section 2. 1.2 The CITY agrees to accept ownership of the right of way and Roadway Facilities as shaded, on Exhibit A, as follows: Blue (light) Indicates Roadway Facilities and right -of -way to be conveyed in fee to the CITY. Except the STATE retains access control and access rights in the areas denoted in in red. 2. RECORDED CONVEYANCE 2.1 Within thirty (30) calendar days following the STATE's written transfer to the CITY of the responsibility for maintenance and operations as provided in Section 1, the STATE will furnish the CITY a recordable conveyance of right -of -way, including the Roadway Facilities constructed thereon, as shown on the plans marked Exhibit A. The conveyance will be recorded pursuant to RCW 65.08.095. 2.2 It is understood and agreed that the above referenced property is transferred for road /street purposes only, and no other use shall be made of said property without the prior written approval of the STATE. It is also understood and agreed that the CITY, its successors or assigns, shall not revise either the right -of -way lines or the access control without prior written approval from the STATE, its successors, or assigns. Revenues resulting from any vacation, sale, or rental of this property or any portion thereof, shall (1) if the property is disposed of to a governmental entity for public use, be placed in the CITY road/street fund and used exclusively for road/street purposes; or (2) if the property is disposed of other than as provided in (1) above, be shared by the CITY and STATE, their successors or assigns, in the same proportion as acquisition costs were shared; except that the CITY may deduct the documented direct costs of any such vacation, sale, or rental. 2.3 The CITY agrees to comply with, and require its successors or assigns to comply with, all civil rights and anti- discrimination requirements of chapter 49.60 RCW, as to the right -of- way and Roadway Facilities to be conveyed. 2.4 The CITY understands and agrees that the STATE is retaining ownership of all rights of ingress and egress, to, from and between the above referenced state highway route and/or Roadway Facilities and the properties abutting said state highway route and/or Roadway Facilities, including all rights of access, light, view and air, and access control as shown by the access prohibition symbol along the above referenced state route and /or Roadway Facilities right -of -way and along abutting properties on the right -of -way access plans marked as Exhibit A. The CITY, its successors or assigns, shall have no right of ingress or egress between the above referenced state route and abutting properties, or the state route and the lands herein conveyed that show the access prohibition symbol. The CITY, its successors or Page 2 of 3 assigns, shall not be entitled to compensation for any loss of access, light, view, or air occasioned by the location, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, or operation of the above referenced state route and/or Roadway Facilities. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By: By: Print name: Print name: Date: Date: Approval as to Form Approval as to Form City Attorney Date: Date: Page 3 of 3 Assistant Attorney General O 0 3 v G= LLJ O O z e g t 6x ^St 2 z r Rif a�.�� a ��a r :�e n g s s "$fir y a C s °`s z °'s. a Z SQ� Y ^6Y�. ap.icsz +1 0 N e I IJ I i r� li J I r 1 I 1 i t r •�N 133N5 335 3NIl J17N, o� t u l LI11YQ4 i 670 2M..._ t i 1 c �t 2A F �F e €Q s 3 w ox W i t a N a r Y w gS N O r tr a? W Q N 4w 9:6 471 I O v Ire' x t R n is, sl iii f�l t to &Z a kid' N 16- 0 C �O��v ax gi K Ala 1% la n is, sl iii f�l t to &Z a kid' N 16- 0 C �O��v ax City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 April 20, 2010 Ramin Pazooki, Manager WSDOT NWR SnoKing Development Services PO Box 330310 15700 Dayton Avenue N Seattle, Washington 98133 -9710 RE: Tukwila Urban Access Improvement Project Letter of Understanding #1 Dear Mr. Pazooki: .Jim fiaggerton, Mayor Enclosed you will find two copies of the Letter of Understanding between the City of Tukwila and WSDOT which have been initialed by Bob Giberson, Public Works Director. The City has accepted your changes to the original letter. However, on the advice of the City Attorney's office, we have amended Attachments A and B to include the language "For Illustrative Purposes Only." Additionally, the original Exhibit A, which was the full legal description and drawing of the area to be conveyed to WSDOT, has been removed to eliminate confusion between the two Exhibit A's. Please initial the change made on the two new exhibits and return one copy back to me at: Cyndy Knighton Senior Transportation Engineer City of Tukwila 6300 Southeenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Thank you for your continued cooperation on getting this project through the necessary reviews and approvals. Sincerely, A vv: Cynd� Kni t ri 4_ k.� Senior Transportation Engineer Encl.: Letter of Understanding (2 originals) TB 1 -0215 Exhibit B sheet 1 of 5 473 April 5, 2010 6200 ;Southcenter Boulevard* Tukwila, Washington 48188 Russell S. East, P.E. Assistant Regional Administrator for SnoKing Washington State Department of Transportation 15700 Dayton Ave N, NB82 -101 PO Box 330310 Seattle, WA 98133 -9710 RE: Tukwila Urban Access Improvement Project Letter of Understanding Dear Mr. East: Jim Ilaggerton, Mayor Negotiations between the Washington State Department of Transportation WSDOT) and the City of Tukwila (CITY) around the Tukwila Urban Access Improvement Project (PROJECT) have been ongoing since 2005. Those discussions have resulted in this Letter of Understanding (LOU). It is agreed by all parties that the following conditions, obligations, and requirements shall apply, and that each party is bound by the following: Issue The CITY has taken lead on a roadway design project predominately along Southcenter Parkway. While a portion of the PROJECT falls under Limited Access control, the larger corridor functions as a CITY street. The CITY has acquired all necessary right -of -way (ROW) for the PROJECT, all new ROW is currently under CITY ownership. The CITY has been coordinating with WSDOT for the PROJECT design and is working toward finalization of the design and advertising the PROJECT for construction. The CITY has acquired the funding for the PROJECT design and construction from multiple sources including CITY funds, federal and local grants, and private funds. No WSDOT funs have been committed to the PROJECT. Several of the grants awarded to the PROJECT are time sensitive and could be revoked by the granting agency should the PROJECT be unreasonably delayed It is in the best interest of both the CITY and WSDOT to work cooperatively to complete the PROJECT as it is mutually beneficial to both agencies. WSDOT Responsibilities 1. WSDOT will work with the Federal Highways Administration (FHWA) to gain approval of thi Limited Access deviation. 2. WSDOT agrees to accept conveyance of ROW from the CITY for the portiaXit t hcenter Parkway which is currently CITY-owned ROW (see attached ROW Exhib)of the ROW conveyance and Certification, WSDOT agrees to relocate the Limited s delin eatio W rA cD N 0 t� WAPW Eng\Old P drivelCyndy \Klickitat\Letter of Understanding WSDOT Tukwila 4- 5- 10.doc 474 Letter of Understanding Tukwila Urban Access Improvement Project Limited Access and ROW March 31, 2010 Page 2 of 2. to the easterly side of the Southcenter Parkway ROW. The CITY and WSDOT agree there is no meaningful benefit at this time as part of this project to extending the Limited Access control further north or south than the existing north/south boundaries along Southcenter Parkway. 3. Upon PROJECT close -out, as defined by the CITY's acceptance -and close -out of the PROJECT, WSDOT agrees to turn -back al O ownership of Sou center Parkway to the, CITY through a Tian Back Agreement.. 4. WSDOT agrees that all transactions agreed upon as part of this LOU is done so without any exchange of cash or any other item of tangible value, other than the mutual benefits achieved through the PROJECT. 5. WSDOT agrees to continue working with the CITY on all remaining design issues, to be detailed in a separate Letter of Understanding. CITY Resuonsibilities I The CITY will submit documentation for the deviation of standard Limited Access requirements for WSDOT and FHWA approval. 2. The CITY will convey to WSDOT that portion of the ROW which will be incorporated into the revised Limited Access area as described above. The CITY will submit appropriate documentation for the conveyance of ROW and the revision to the Limited Access area as part of the normal ROW Certification process for the PROJECT. 3. The CITY agrees to continue all normal .maintenance activities within the PROJECT area, exclusive of the interstate facilities, through PROJECT close -out. 4. The CITY agrees to accept the ROW turn -back from WSDOT at PROJECT close -out. 5. The CITY agrees that all transactions agreed upon as part of this LOU is done so without any exchange of cash or any other item of tangible value, other than the mutual benefits achieved through the PROJECT. 6. The CITY agrees to continue finalizing the project design to incorporate the remaining design issues verbally agreed upon, the details of which will be documented in a separate Letter of Understanding. By signing the spaced provided below, the CITY and WSDOT acknowledge and agree to the terms at commitments outlined above. Concurrence by: 1_&K fu-�� Bob Giberson, P.E. Public Works Director City of Tukwila Date: A�� 6 "2o1 Concurrence by: Russell S. East, P.E. Assistant Regional Administrator SnoKing WSDOT Date: �q W W 475 Xf io\' 3y 7� :I!;I 4 f! I C� -f rn I f y Jam. J NI uj rsf� 1 -021 5 tieet 4 of Exlhibit B s r D CL uj rsf� 1 -021 5 tieet 4 of Exlhibit B s �YJ q t i 1 TMR N j `•ti ii t .zs{ f I i t i t I 1• j ar i t J: t' g a 1 aS 0 ti ll Q• j W VI Tj3 A -()2A �t e W Transportation Committee Minutes November 21, 2011— Paoe 3 H. Tukwila Urban Center Access Klickitat) Project Riaht of Wav Transfer Staff is seeking Council authorization for: 1. Quit Claim Deed that conveys a right -of -way (ROW) to the Washington State Department of Transportation WSDOT) from the City of Tukwila along Southcenter Parkway for the Klickitat Project; and 2. Acceptance of a ROW Turnback Agreement which transfers ownership of the above roadway, operation and maintenance from WSDOT back to the City of Tukwila This process is necessary for appropriate transfer of roadway, and allows for the adjustment of a limited access line which will include property conveyed to WSDOT by Tukwila. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. III. SCATBd The Committee reviewed and briefly discussed the October 18 SCATBd minutes, noting the update of the Tukwila Longacres Sounder Station. Sound Transit expects to complete design of the Station in 2012. SCATBd minutes have been delayed due to King County staff shortages. INFORMATION ONLY. Meeting adjourned at 4:32 p.m. Next meeting: Per Tentative 2012 Committee Calendar Committee Chair Approval Minutes by KAM.. Reviewed by GL. 479 .;l Upcoming Meetings Events November /December 2011 28th (Monday) 29th (Tuesday) 30th (Wednesday) 1st (Thursday) 2nd (Friday) r'^� ^ity Utilities Cmte, Aff n w n w,. 5:00 PM C—nIte (CR #1) (Cancelled) Equity Diversity Commission, 5:15 PM (CR #3) City Council Committee of the Whole Mtg., 5:00 PM (Council Chambers) Please note earlier start time for this week's meeting. 5th (Monday) 6th (Tuesday) Transportation Chamber of Cmte, Commerce 5:00 PM Gov't. (CR 91) Community Affairs Cmte, Civil Service 12:00 NOON (Chamber Commission, Office) 5:00 PM (CR 93) Finance Safety Cmte, City Council 5:00 PM (CR #3) Executive Session, Arts 6:00 PM Commission City Council 5:30 PM Regular Mtg., (Community 7:00 PM Center) (Council Chambers) 7th (Wednesday) 8th (Thursday) 9th (Friday) COPCAB, 6:30 PM (CR #5) (Rescheduled from 11123111) 3rd (Saturday) Holiday Gift and Food Drive Westfield Southcenter Mall North Parking lot 7:00 AM 4:00 PM The Tukwila Police Department will be collecting food, gifts or monetary donations to help support the Tukwila Food Pantry and the Tukwila Community Center's Holiday Giving Program! The new Police Command Vehicle will be there, and the Tukwila Police Fxplorers will be doing fingerprinting to help keep kids safe! Breakfast with Santa 9:00 to 11:30 AM Tukwila Community Center Pancake breakfast and holiday entertainment (Children can get a professional photo with Santa for an additional fee). Cost of breakfast is $5.00 at the door (seating is limited). 10th (Saturday) Council Coffee Chat 10:00 AM to 12:00 NOON Stop by and informally talk with a Tukwila City Councilmember about anything on your mind regarding Tukwila. Friendz Cafe (12930 E. Marginal Way) Arts Commission: 1st Tues., 5:30 PM, Tukwila Community Center. Contact Stephanie Gardner at 206 767 -2342. Chamber of Commerce's Tukwila Government and Community Affairs Committee: 1 st Tues., 12:00 Noon, Chamber Offices. Contact Lynn Wallace at 206 -575 -1633. City Council Committee of Whole (C.O.W.) Meeting: 2nd 4th Mon., 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall. ➢City Council Regular Meeting: 1st 3rd Mon., 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall. ➢Civil Service Commission: 1st Mon., 5:00 PM Conf. Room 43. Contact Human Resources at 206 433 -1831. ➢Community Affairs Parks Committee: 2nd 4th Mon., 5'00 PM, Conf. Room #3 11128111 meeting cancelled. ➢COPCAB (Community Oriented Policing Citizens Adv. Board): 4th Wed., 6:30 PM, Conf. Rm #5. Phi Huynh (206- 433 7175). ➢Equity Diversity Commission: Ist Thurs., 5:15 PM, Conf. Room #3. Contact Joyce Trantina at 206- 433 -1850. ➢Finance Safety Committee: Ist 3rd Tues., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room #3. ➢Utilities Committee: 2nd 4th Tues., 5:00 PM, Conf Room #I 11129111 meeting cancelled. i Tentative Agenda Schedule �MO x e 0 5 l TH VIE�TING 1 M$EEf 6 2 EETING�� MEETING REGULAR C 41 REGULAR In �IM tea..._ November 7 14 21 28 See agenda packet cover sheet for this week's agenda (November 28, 2011 Committee of the 1Nhole Meeting) December 5 Soecial Presentations: Valley Swat Award. 3rd Quarter Financeil Status Report. Unfinished Business: Budget Amendment Ordinance and CIP resolution. A resolution adopting a new Public Works fee schedule. An agreement for the 2012 Small Drainage Program. An amendment to agreement with Cascade Water Alliance. An ordinance refunding the LTGO 2003 Bonds. 12 19 Aonointments: Equity and Diversity: Confirm the appointment of Charlie Penor to Position #7 on the Equity an Diversity with a term expiring 7/31/2013 Civil Service: Confirm the reappointment of Ronald Johnston to POsition #2 on the Civil Service Commission, with a term expiring 12/31/2017. Library Advisory: Confirm the reappointment of Marie Parrish to Position #3 on the Library Advisory Board, with a term to expire 12/31/2013. Confirm the reappointment of Linda McLeod to Position #5 on the Library Advisory Board, with a term to expire 12/31/2013. Unfinished Business: A briefing on Tukwila Village draft deal terms. New Business: A resomlution thanking Joan Hernandez for her years of service. 27 (Tuesday) OVA