HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 2033 - Tecton CompanyA!
BUILDING PERMIT
DATE OF ISSUANCE
February 4, 1981
JOB ADDRESS
16000 Christensen Rd.
LEGAL LOT NO.
DESCR.
OWNER
The Tecton Co.
ADDR
lM0 Christensen Rd.
CONTRACTOR
Same
ADDRESS
PERMIT
CITY OF TUKWILA NUMBER
6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188
EXPIRES
August 4, 1981
BLOCK
TRACT
9 0 3- 7
fl SEE ATTACHED SHEET
PHONE
246 -7674
%188
PHONE
246 -7674
ZIP
LICENSE NO. SST NO.
223- 01 -TE -CT OTS
BUILDING USE
Offices X
CLASS OF WORK 2
[XNEW 0 ADDITION ❑REMODEL OREPAIR OOTHER (Specify)
BLDG. 1st FL. I 2nd FL. I BASEMENT I GARAGE I DECK I MEZZANINE I OF STORES I TOTAL S.F. I VALUATION
AREA k
13,000 14,000 16,000 43,000 1,720,000.00
I CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT FEE BUILDING I 2107.00
THAT THE APPLICABLE CITY OF TUKWILA REQUIREMENTS WILL BE DISTRIB. PLAN RVW. 1370.00
MET, AND HAT I AM UTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROJECT DEMOLITION I
BOND
OTHER
OWNER AGENT SIGNATURE
TOTAL 3477.00
COMMENTS:
TYPE CONST, I OCC. GROUP I OCC. LOAD I FIRE ZONE I USE ZONE I AUTO SPRINKLERS REQ.
VN B2 400 Cy OYES ONO
THESE INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED BY LAW
1. Driveway 2. OK to 3. Roof 4. OK to 5. Wall- 6. Structure
approach and pour footing sheathing enclose board complete and/
slope and /or and nailing framing nailing or OK to
foundation OK OK occupy
FOR INP,TION CALL 433 -1849
BUILDI OFFI AL, CITY OF TUKWILA
THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED CONSPICUOUSLY ON BUILDING
:I
al
BUILDING PERMIT
DATE OF ISSUANCE
I'i'4a rtrlr}r
1 1, .I W1
JOB ADDRESS
],(i00Gt t:11213teDS ,1 d.
LEGAL LOT NO.
DESCR.
OWNER
f`t3C•L`07l Co.
ADD Clai. a1~f3J see nd
CONTRACTOR
saine
ADDRESS
CITY OF TUKWILA
6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188
EXPIRES
u1pust 4, 1981
LICENSE NO.
BUILDING USE
I���:IfrOS .�i1�
CLASS OF WORK
PERMIT
NUMBER���1
;Zl SEE ATTACHED SHEET
❑NEW ❑ADDITION ❑REMODEL ❑REPAIR ❑OTHER (Specify)
BLDG. 1st FL. I 2nd FL. I BASEMENT -I GARAGE I DECK I MEZZANINE I OF STORES I TOTAL S;F.'
AREA
1:5,5)5)0 14,00o 16,130() 43,000
I CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT BUILDING I FEE
THAT THE APPLICABLE CITY OF TUKWILA REQUIREMENTS WILL BE DISTRIB. PLAN RVW.
MET, AND�,THAT I AM AN /jUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROJECT. DEMOLITION I
BOND
f l,�Crt OTHER
OWNER AGENT SIGNATURE
VALUATION
L,720,000-00
x:107.00
1370.00
TYPE CONST. I OCC. GROUP I OCC. LOAD I FIRE ZONE USE ZONE I AUTO SPRINKLERS REO:
Mri; 5)U 1,��' DIY YES El NO
THESE INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED BY L,�W
1. Driveway 2. OK to lC� 3. Roof �/V OK to 5. Wall- 6. Structure
approach and pour footing sheathing enclose board complete and/
slope and /or n and nailing framin nailing or OK to
foundation OIL OK occupy
FOR INSPECTION ff/fi FM4 W-4
BUILDING OFFI 'IAL, CITY OF TUKWILA
THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED CONSP .I000USLY:O.N..BU.1,LD.ING::.
t
ti
t:ounty executwe Janes W Guenther, Director
King County Courthouse 500 King County Admin. Bldg.
Seattle, Washington 98104 Seattle, WA 98104
(206) 344.4040 (206) 344 -2517
January 29, 1981
Herman Huggins
Northwest Regional Office
Department of Ecology
4350 150th N.E.
Redmond, WA. 98052
Re: State Flood Control Zone Application #2 -1390
Dear Mr. Huggins:
We are enclosing a State Flood Control Zone Application and plans submitted
to this office by the Tecton Company for construction of a fire lane, park-
ing lots, and office buildings in Section 25, Township 23 North, Range
4 East,
We have reviewed the application and are submitting the following comments:
1) The water surface elevation for the Green River, with a controlled
discharge from the Howard Hanson Dam of 12,000 cfs as measured at
Auburn (Porter Gauge), is 26:0 feet (Mean Sea Level Datum) at the
subject site. The proposed finished floor elevations are shown to
be at or above elevation 26.5 feet.
2) King County must be notified at least 48 hours prior to doing any
work adjacent to or on the existing river bank.
3) The proposed rock work along the existing river bank must be con-
structed to the satisfaction of King County Surface Water Mgmt. Div.
If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact
Larry Gibbons of this office at 344 -4036.
Sincerely,
G.E. WANNAMAKER, P.E.
Development Review Section
Surface Water Management Division
GEW:LRG:dk
Enci: SFCZA #2 -1390 Plans
cc: ie e City of Tukwila
�tDon Williams, City of Tukwila
Tecton Company
herman huggins
nrothwest regional office
deartment of ecology
state flood control zone application
r
M
r
RECEIVED
CITY OF TUKMLA
s;
NOV 2 0 1980
BUMN3 OEM
Geoteehnical Engineering and Geology
305 136th Place N.E., Suite 101, Bellevue, Washington 98005
Phone: (206) 643 -3780 Seattle (206) 464 -1 S94
r
August 20, 1980 E- 1363 -1
Tecton Company
16040 Christensen Road
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Attention: Mr. Sid Paul
Subject: Geotechnical Engineering Study
Phase II Office Building
Christensen Road
Tukwila, Washington
Gentlemen:
In accordance with your request we have conducted a geotech-
nical evaluation of the subject project. The purpose of this
study was to determine the subsurface conditions at the site and
to provide recommendations for site preparation and foundation
design. This report presents the results of our study for the
Phase II construction. A subsurface exploration was also con-
ducted for the.Phase III construction. The results will be pre-
sented in a separate report.
Our study indicates that the proposed site is underlain by 13
to 20 feet of loose sandy silt to silty sand and medium stiff to
stiff clayey silt. The structure may be planned with conventional
spread footings bearing on a 2.5 foot thick structural fill mat.
The following sections describe our study and explain our
recommendations in detail.
greater
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
We understand the project will involve the construction of
two office buildings approximately 60 by 265 feet in plan dimen-
sion. The anticipated exterior column loads will be on the order
of 60 kips. The interior column loads are expected to be on the
order of 90 kips. Perimeter wall loads will be on the order of 2
to 3 kips. The finished floor of the building is planned to be
at E1. 26.5. This will of to
require placement up 4 feet of fill.
r
4�
4�
AL
Tecton Company
August 20, 1980
FIELD INVESTIGATION AND TESTING
E
F
Our field investigation was performed on August 5 and 8,
1980. The subsurface conditions were explored by excavating five
test pits to a maximum depth of 15 feet below the existing sur-
face. In addition, 2 borings were drilled to a maximum depth of
29 feet below the existing grade. The borings were drilled using
a truck mounted drill rig with continuous flight hollow stem
augers which were used to advance the boreholes and provide hole
support during sampling.
The field investigation was continuously monitored by an engi-
neering geologist from our firm who classified the soils encoun-
tered, maintained a log of each test pit and boring. Obtained
representative samples and observed pertinent site features.
Soils were classified visually in the field according to the
Unified Soil Classification System which is.presented on Plate 2.
Logs of the individual test pits and borings are presented on
Plates 3 through 9.
In each boring, Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were per-
formed at selected intervals in accordance with ASTM Test Desig-
nation D -1586. In addition, a 2.42 inch I. D. ring sampler was
used to obtain relatively undisturbed soil samples at selected
depths. Blow counts for this sampler were correlated to the SPT
values.
I
Representative SPT, undisturbed ring samples and soil samples
from the test pits were placed in closed containers and returned
to our laboratory for further examination and testing. Visual
classifications were supplemented by index test such as sieve
analyses on representative samples. Field moisture determina-
tions, together with classifications, are shown on the test pit
and boring logs included in this report. The results of the sieve
analyses are illustrated on Plate 10.
SITE CONDITIONS
Surface
The site is located east of Christensen Road in Tukwila,
Washington. The area under investigation is bounded by undevel-
oped land to the north and south and Phase I of the project pres-
ently under construction, to the east.
i
At the time of our investigation, the site had been cleared
of all surface vegetation. Fill had been stockpiled in the north-
west corner of the proposed building area prior to our test pit
investigation but was being removed.
1'
Earth Consultant, Inc. d
1 1
Tecton Company E- 1363 -1
August 20, 1980 Page Three
No standing water or surface seepage was noted at the time of
our investigation.
Subsurface
As indicated by our test pits and borings, variable condi-
tions occur within the proposed building area.
In boring B -4 and Test Pits TP -12 through TP -14 and TP -16.,
7 to 10 feet of loose fill consisting of sandy clayey silt and
native soils consisting of silty fine grained sand were found
immediately below the surface. The loose sands and silts were
immediately underlain by 3.5 to 6.5 feet of soft to stiff clayey
silt and silty clay. The silt and clay unit was directly under-
lain by medium dense silty sand grading to a dense sand with silt.
Boring B -5 and Test Pit TP -15 encountered approximately 2
feet of medium dense gravelly, silty sand fill directly below the
surface. The fill unit was immediately underlain by approximately
18 feet of loose silty fine grained sand to sandy silt. The loose
sand to silt is underlain by dense silty sand grading to slightly
silty sand as indicated by Boring B -5.
All of our test pits were terminated in the loose to medium
dense silty sands at depths ranging from 14 to 15 feet below the
t existing grade. The borings were terminated in the dense slightly
t M silty sand at a depth of 29 feet below the existing grade.
Groundwater was encountered in both borings at approximately
16 feet below the existing grade.
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
General
N Based on our study, it is our opinion that the site is
suitable for the construction of the project provided our recom-
mendations are incorporated into the development plans.
The primary soil engineering feature at the site is the
presence of 13 to 20 feet of loose and soft to medium stiff soils
beneath the site. These materials will undergo settlements in the
range of 3 to 4 inches when subjected to the fill and building
loads. However, most of these settlements will be caused by the
fill loads, hence post- construction settlements under the building
loads should be low provided settlements under the fills are
allowed to stabilize prior to starting building construction.
Loose soils present immediately beneath the surface are also
expected to undergo some differential settlements under foundation
loads. To create uniform conditions below the footings and to
Earth Consuhanb, Inc.
Tecton Company
August 20, 1980
E- 1363 -1
Page Four
reduce these differential settlements, the foundations should be
supported on a structural fill mat extending at least 2.5 feet
beneath footing bottoms.
The following sections of this report present more detailed
recommendations for various geotechnical engineering aspects of
the project which should be incorporated into the project design
and construction. This report has been prepared for specific
application to this project in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering practices for the exclusive use of
Tecton Company and their representatives. No other warranty,
expressed or implied, is made.
Foundations
Based on the design parameters outlined in the Project Des-
cription section of this report, it is our opinion the proposed
structures may be supported on continuous and individual spread
footings bearing directly on at least 2.5 feet of structural
fill placed in accordance with the Site Preparation section of
this report. The structural fill should extend'2.5 feet beyond
footing perimeters.
Footings should extend to a minimum depth of 18 inches
below the lowest adjacent final grade and may be designed for an
allowable soil bearing pressure of 2500 pounds per square foot
(psf), for dead plus live loads. A one -third increase is permis-
sible when considering lateral loads due to wind and earthquakes.
All footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches.
We recommend that all footing excavations be examined by a
representative from Earth Consultants, Inc. to observe compliance
with the design concepts presented in this report.
Settlements
For the anticipated building and fill loads, we expect that
settlements on the order of 3 to 4 inches will occur. Most of
these settlements should occur within 30 days after placement of
the fill. Hence, we recommend that building construction not be
started until settlements under the fill loads have stabilized.
The post- construction settlements under building loads are then
expected to be between 1 and 1.5 inches, with about half this
amount occurring as differential settlements between interior and
exterior columns.
We recommend that several settlement markers be placed on the
existing grade prior to any fill placement. Settlement reading
should be taken every other day while the fill is being placed and
approximately once a week thereafter. These readings will permit
Earth Consultants, Inc.
f
t;
t.
Tecton Company
August 20, 1980
E- 1363 -1
Page Four
reduce these differential settlements, the foundations should be
supported on a structural fill mat extending at least 2.5 feet
beneath footing bottoms.
The following sections of this report present more detailed
recommendations for various geotechnical engineering aspects of
the project which should be incorporated into the project design
and construction. This report has been prepared for specific
application to this project in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering practices for the exclusive use of
Tecton Company and their representatives. No other warranty,
expressed or implied, is made.
Foundations
Based on the design parameters outlined in the Project Des-
cription section of this report, it is our opinion the proposed
structures may be supported on continuous and individual spread
footings bearing directly on at least 2.5 feet of structural
fill placed in accordance with the Site Preparation section of
this report. The structural fill should extend'2.5 feet beyond
footing perimeters.
Footings should extend to a minimum depth of 18 inches
below the lowest adjacent final grade and may be designed for an
allowable soil bearing pressure of 2500 pounds per square foot
(psf), for dead plus live loads. A one -third increase is permis-
sible when considering lateral loads due to wind and earthquakes.
All footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches.
We recommend that all footing excavations be examined by a
representative from Earth Consultants, Inc. to observe compliance
with the design concepts presented in this report.
Settlements
For the anticipated building and fill loads, we expect that
settlements on the order of 3 to 4 inches will occur. Most of
these settlements should occur within 30 days after placement of
the fill. Hence, we recommend that building construction not be
started until settlements under the fill loads have stabilized.
The post- construction settlements under building loads are then
expected to be between 1 and 1.5 inches, with about half this
amount occurring as differential settlements between interior and
exterior columns.
We recommend that several settlement markers be placed on the
existing grade prior to any fill placement. Settlement reading
should be taken every other day while the fill is being placed and
approximately once a week thereafter. These readings will permit
Earth Consultants, Inc.
1i
r
0
r
Tecton Company E- 1363 -1
August 21, 1980 Page Five
continuous monitoring of settlement under the fill loads and will
be used to determine when building construction can be started.
Site Preparation
In all areas that will receive buildings or pavements, the
subgrade should be proofrolled under the observation of a repre-
sentative of Earth Consultants, Inc. This procedure should indi-
cate the presence of any exceptionally loose or unstable areas
which, if present, should be overexcavated and replaced by crushed
rock. Generally, about 1 to 2 feet of rock may be required to
"bridge" any soft yielding soils.
All structural fill should be placed in 8 to 10 -inch thick
loose lifts and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative
compaction as determined by ASTM D- 1557 -70 (Modified Proctor).
If any of the grading is to be conducted during wet weather, we
recommend that granular materials with a maximum size of 3 inches,
containing less than 5 percent fines, be used for structural
fill. During dry weather, other granular materials may be used
provided they can be properly compacted. Imported fill samples
should be submitted to Earth Consultants, Inc. prior to bringing
on the site. The placement of the structural fill should be
monitored and tested by Earth Consultants, Inc.
To compensate for settlement that will occur under the fill
loads, an additional 6 inches of fill compacted to the require-
ments for.structural fill should be placed above the finished
subgrade elevation.
Pavement Areas
All parking and roadway areas should be underlain by a mini-
mum of 12 inches of structural fill placed in accordance with
the Site Preparation section of this report. A greater thick-
ness may be necessary to stabilize soft unstable areas. The
upper 12 inches of pavement subgrade should be compacted to at
least 95 percent of the maximum density. Below this level a
compactive effort of 90 percent would be adequate. The pavement
section for lightly loaded traffic or parking areas should con-
sist of 2 inches of asphalt surfacing over 4 inches of crushed
rock base or 3 inches of asphalt base (ATB). Heavier
loaded traffic areas will require thicker sections. We suggest
that a CBR value of 10 be used for design of heavy traffic areas.
Additional Services
It is recommended that Earth Consultants, Inc. be retained
to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is
Earth Consultants, Inc.
i
IN
TP-12
r
JAME
E
r
r
l
Ow
property
Line
c RF
4 ev
V -14
a
I
g'3
TP
Z TP'1 3
ROAD
t
CHRISTENSEN
eAKO
earth consultant
test pit and boring location plan
tecton office
soil classification chart
t
TEST PIT NO. 12
Logged By --U
Date 815180 E lev.
Depth USCS Soil Description 1161 Lab Data
0
ML grown sandy clayey SILT, loose, moist with 20
minor amounts of wood and lumber debris. (FILL)
5
i
24
c =.3
10 FIL Mottled brown -tan grading to blue gray silty 52 tsf
CL CLAY to clayey SILT, medium stiff, wet. c
47 tsf
SI.1 grown silty fine SAND, loose to medium 14
dense, moist.
15
Test pit terminated at 14 feet below the existing
Vade.:
No groundwater encountered.
(Minor caving from 7.5 to 8.5 feet.
Eaetb
Consultants Ins.
GtOTiCNNICAL RNGINCCRING GCOLOGr
TEST PIT LOGS
TECTON OFFICE PHASE II
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
PrOj. NO, 1363 -1 DateAugust'80 t Plate 3
f
Logged By
Daft R/qjRn Elev.
Depth W
USCS Soil Description Lab Data I.
0
Brown clayey SILT to SILT with clay, soft, moist. 39
ML 59
grades sand y and loose below 4 feet.
10 ML Blue-gray clayey SILT with organic debris, m' 38
ffiedfuwgtiff to stiff, moist' to wet.
39 C=.5
tsf
SM Blue-gray silty fine grained SAND, medium 30
15 dense, moist (with pockets of clayey SILT)
Test pit.terminated at 15 feet below the existing
grade. rade.
No groundwater encountered
Minor caving from 8 to 9 feet.
20
TEST PIT LOGS
TECTON OFFICE PHASE 11
Earth TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
Ckmsultmts Ineoft
-01COTECHNICAL CNGINCCRING GICOLOGY
Pro l. N DateAugustSO Plats 4
0-1363-1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Logged B BT
Date 8/5/ Elev.
Depth W
1ft,1 LISCS Soil Description 1961 Lib Date
Tan gravelly silty SAND, medium dense,
SP1 moist. (FILL)
4 11.
SM
f
ML Y Y Brown silt fine SAND to sand SILT loose moist. 10
ML
10 1 11
Blue -gray with pockets of tan clayey SILT 43 c =.35
ML with organic debris, medium stiff, moist to wet.
38
:ti
Brown silty SAND with pockets of blue -gray c =.45
SM
15
clayey SILT, medium dense, moist. 25
Te4t pit terminated at 15 feet below the existing
grade.
No groundwater encountered.
20
TEST PIT LOGS
Earth TECTON OFFICE PHASE II
Consu)tanti Inc. TUKW I LA, WASHINGTON
•090TLCMNICAL RNGINRCRING R 0i01.OGY Pro). N o. 1363 -1 DahAugust'80 �Plete 5
i
e
e
t
Q
A
?.0
Test pit terminated at 14.5 feet below the
existing grade.
No groundwater encountered
15
2a
9 .I'm
Earth Consultants IncO'N-
•GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING A GEOLOGY
TEST PIT LOGS
TECTON OFFICE PHASE II
T1,11"WILA, I4ASNINGl'0.',
Proj. No. 1363 -1 Date August' 80 Plate 6
r r r
R
C. A
r•. r: w�"::.'.: n u µn M:: 1.'if '•Ar
TEST PIT NO. 5
Logged By
BT
Date 8/5/80
Elev.
Depth
W
(n,)
USCS
Soil Description (96) Lab Data
SM
Tan gravelly silty SAND, medium dense, moist.
(FILL)
f.1....
17
SM
Brown silty fine SAND to sandy SILT with an
5
ML
increasing amount of organic debris, loose grading
medium dense, moist.
6
10 -4
i
e
e
t
Q
A
?.0
Test pit terminated at 14.5 feet below the
existing grade.
No groundwater encountered
15
2a
9 .I'm
Earth Consultants IncO'N-
•GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING A GEOLOGY
TEST PIT LOGS
TECTON OFFICE PHASE II
T1,11"WILA, I4ASNINGl'0.',
Proj. No. 1363 -1 Date August' 80 Plate 6
r r r
4 .�t4 r.,�i•'f M "..r,.,r'� -'i wYY"- S.. Lt^' ,.,,:'�.cc .o....:.- e�.i.�#l��
1 \J i
f
`TEST PIT N4. 16 Loomed By 13
Date 8 7 5 0 Elev.
Depth W
(ft.) USCS Soil Description (961 Lab Data
0
tr sm Brown silty fine SAND to sandy SILT (with roots 12
11L in upper area), loose grading medium dense, moist.
5
25
40
10
i ML Blue -gray clayey SILT, medium stiff, wet.
40 c =4.5
tsf
Blue -gray silty SAND with lenses of t
SM clayey SILT, medium dense, moist. 34
Test pit terminated at 15 feet below the existing
grade..
No groundwater encountered.
Minor caving from 7.5 to 9 feet.
20
rJ
TEST PIT LOGS
TECTON OFFICE PHASE It
Earth TUK� I LA WASHINGTON
1
Consultants Inc.
•GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING A GEOLOGY
Proj, No.1363 -1 Date August' BO Plate 7
-r., mow" 6 ri` '"w.. '7naw ...r ...�M". ,.i. y :d: Y.... o.a"•'.. "+rCk`fkt+Ax
1
BORING NO. 4
Logged By BT
Date -3 below ton of
8�8�80 ELEV.
V. H.
US Depth (N) W
I Graph CS Soil Description (f Sample Blows M
Brown sandy SILT grading to sandy,
1,1 ML clayey SILT, loose, moist with 5
f some organic material below 4 feet. 32
,�1 5 3 38
qu =1.0 tsf
Brown to tan mottled clayey SILT, 1 6
ij�i{ I ML moist to wet, medium stiff to 46
stiff. 10
12 32
41
12
23
SP1 Black gray SAND with silt, medium dense
SP grading dense, moist. 15
x v 1/8 13 27
l)
22
25
3
37 25
Boring terminated at 29 feet on August 8, 1980
BORING LOG
TECT014 OFFICE PHASE 11
r�
Earth TUM I LA, WASHINGTON
Consultants Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING e, GEOLOGY Pfoj• No. 1363 -1 Date Auqust'80 Plate 8
e
'BORING NO. 5
Logged By BT
Date 8/3/80 ELEV, -3.5' Below top of
F.H.
Graph C3 Soil Description de p t h Sample Blows W
23 14
it
5
Gray brown silty fine SAI4D with 4 20
:.y::.r•'.• S14 lenses of sandy SILT, medium dense
grading loose, moist.
5 18
10
4 13
79 pcf
1/6" 34
15
3/8/80
4 40
t. ?0
Sfi 11I at:k �1r� wit aY SANII h si] t, dense
i Ino s t
47 28
25
43 24
Boring terminated at 29 feet on August 8 1980
i
ti
k BORING LOG
TECTON OFFICE PHASE II
Earth TUKIJILA, 'HASHMGM1
Consultants Inc.
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING e! GEOLOGY
,g L Proj. No. 1363 Date August'80 Plate g
grain size analysis
t
L A Z
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
�N 20
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Public Works Department 433 -1850
7908
November 3, 1980
Mr. Glen Schultz
SEA Engineers
33811 9th Avenue S.
Federal Way, WA 98003
Re: River Park Professional Building
Building "C"
Dear Mr. Schultz:
The Public Works Department has reviewed your plan for Building "C"
Plan 2 of 2 (dated October 7, 1980) and is returning it for resubmittal
so that you will have the opportunity to address the following comments:
1) The drainage plan shall show completed permanent drainage
facilities at the north end of the property and provide
drainage throughout the site with a minimum 0.5% slope.
2) All sanitary sewers on private property shall be provided
at a 2% minimum grade (including pump station, force main,
if necessary).
3) Provide valves to hydrants three feet to ten feet from each
hydrant on the site.
4) Indicate blocking for all watermains 3" in diameter or greater
at ends, bends, and junctions.
5) All watermains shall be 52 D.I.P.
6) Send the attached hydraulic calculations with your resubmittal
and have plans stamped by the insurance underwriters and
Tukwila Fire Department before submittal to Public Works
(via Building Department).
Your plans are being returned for re,submittal at this time.� If you
have any questions regarding this review, do not hesitate to call me (433- 1856).
Sincerely,
F<ev
M� i r ip Fraser
Engineer
cc: ,Al Pieper, Building OfficialC
Tukwila Maintenance Shops
Attachment
x
1) 1. F'a.�� }:,c:'r 1
Bt..li,l. XI eP"'iii r''t; ment
C::I, 't:'.:: tof t ukw :i.:l e
R e V Riverview P ii3Y lC {1.dg, 02
1 V
Sepr Al.'
In revie the a lcove m Pr P n is v t•: note
the following items!
It Repr«l:i.rer:,i fire dampers shall be installed Pot US:,C:
Standard 043
24 Per U C: S ectio n 12.1 .1:::X:1:'1• doors s, b or-6 f'rii3 ble
fr(:)m vthe inside without 't:he use of a- I..e..3 or iiif'1.:3 special
k now :I, e to tip e or (i•?'f �f C3 r't, a
a P er U1"{:: Se ction a. 2 a :1.1.:3 1:,1 9 at C.'v e r u r e n r,.l :I. r ei d exit
iJ an wh ta't;her'wi reo to c :I, e ar'1.5:3 in d ic at e
too 01 r (::t c't; :i,o l'•i o 6 0 r e a s v on E X 1: T sign with 1. e't.'t. e r 4s .Fort. l e ast
'1 <i 1. t� is
«s :I..i :i t'1chle ('h:i.1h an r t: a d :i• :L 3 r:.i :i s't.:i: sh b 1.t' iii•ha b
6 d
Wiii:l"1. <.i; a re t 'f':i. rc•;• •<s't,op P'��er,f Pet t.1BC; Section 2517 i'f'.} o
iii t ra t:.
1 t
t. ct t« 'f' a.1, 3 i P' r :i r'r l :I. s:: r i
1 h :L S5 i:� 1.1 a..l: t:i a. l'1'iS ':L Ss' t 1„ t; sprinkler(,)
r
'ze s ���:a 'k ;i, o n <s iit rc reor.!:i.rt::+d Per C;:i.'t:r:3 {:1rr..i:i.rr'3 tc:t:i
I t:r is
t 1 1. <is l"r t:� m r..l to •t• t', t r I•, l rr 'i 'l; •l• c:.'r:i No-the I i 1 M i:3 r ss i t for
a;:-proviiia. r: to installation (L "ow.:& as shown is
J.1 "r i3 �.:i f• t:i i:J ia'l; ti! e
Ss p r` i n k, l e r ri r` iii i r' o 4s s h a ll t t; '1 t. com
n a; :i w r I•t C3 .L 1. L: t. r•• t:•. i3 r c::.1 t« 3
l ic e ns ed 'la:I PF+ 't.t'1is tube of wor Drawin sh all first
r,rt. i:3 }:•frovet:.i bw the Washington ft..t.rvt•:'i:3:inm Rating. Burer".3u!
i:3 r'{, )•rya M .a't...! <E3 a. h: r' o a. r'r e:. t•« f i. r' m or Industri R isk In ..(r c:: r K 'l, t•t r•.'r r•r
t: t:3 tt7cat '1`r..!(�.wa. :L 3 °:i. r't:r X:!c::�P <str tn'tt•:•rn t: t No work shall comm
w.a.'t hoy't i:3g;• aved r:. iriilw:LP'rf.:ls4 (NO f°X {::IiLI "'T,IONS).
(:i f(:i. c:. •t: c) t: r• c: t:) rt •t; <;3 cr •t,, c•, i to witness flush of
r t'..•i 9 200 P s P r t:.cts <.;r b rss t f (a a :1
to h r „i c� r'st r't:) r rf t��- :i. l and c.:S p r� t, a ll
t�� r 1, r•r I a. rt r ti, rs •1', c:•) !rr r:. :i. r'r t;.t
e 1' 7 ':1.r o t .:'l:ii. I "iMUISsI 6 be Provi i:ier:i r: N f'•f''A :p..J•O a a
City of Tukwila Fire Department, 444 Andover Park East, Tukwila, Washington .981,88 (208) 575-4404
x
Hauling Hauling permits must be applied for when'any hauling
is done on City streets.: A $2,000-bond must be posted along
with a copy of the hauler's certificate. of insurance. Permit
fee is $25.00.unless the hauler has a City Business License
where the fee is waived.
r .:ft -•r "s, a `-•i�
ILA
qs City of Tukwila .0200 Southcenter. Boulevard
o ukwila Washington 98188 ;:.�r;i;
1908 Frank Todd, Mayor
July 16, 1980
Tecton Company
16040 Christensen Road
Tukwila, WA 98188
Re: Public Works Review of,
Foundation'
Gentlepersons:
The review of the site plan 1 of 1 has been provided by the' Public
Works Department with the following comments.
Required permits by this department.to be applied for and obtained
24 -hours prior to construction are as follows:
Sanitary Side Sewer Sanitary sewers shall be of P.V.C. (schedule
#35 minimum) with Class B bedding. Provide -clean -out at midpoint
in 1% sanitary line. Sanitary sewer permit fee:' $230.00 connection
and $20.00 inspection Total Permit $250.00.
Curb 'Cut /Access /Sidewalk Provide sidewalk at.. width designated (6
per sidewalk ordinance and City of Tukwila Standard. Plan. A minimum
twenty -four .foot wide curb apron required *at entrance. Permit'
fee $25.00...
Storm Drainage /Retention This plan shall be approved and inspected
through King County Hydraulics. Per this plan, all drainage from the
site goes directly into the Green River. No. p6 mitrrequired *by Tukwila.
Domestic Water Meter /Service Plans shall be submitted for Public
Works Department review and approval.
Fire Hvdrant /Loop /Sprinkler System Fire services shall be provided
per the requirements of insurance underwriters•and the Tukwila Fire
Department prior to Public Works approval. Please submit these plans
i
Ilk
yw,
Tecton Company
Page 2
16040 Christensen Road
July 16, 1980'
For Tukwila Fire Department's review and approval and resubmit to
the Public.Works Department. A sprinkler vault for the fire. loop
hydrant /sprinkler system shall be per Tukwila Public Works Department
Standard Plan •and.Water Department requirements. This fire sprinkler
vault must be located in private right -of -way, but not in the. driveway
due to the'P.Z.V. post above ground. All piping shall be D.I.P. class.,,
$52•. Provide thrust blocks at all.junctions, bends, hydrants, and ends
of pipe for fire protection system. Provide valving to hydrants per
Tukwila Standard Plan for Hydrants. Permit fee $25.00.
Fire Protection Meter Per Tukwila Municipal Code 14.04.250, -fire
protection sprinklers must be separately metered from domestic water
meter. Fee based on -size of meter.
Landscape irrigation, if..any, shall be reviewed per future plan
submittal. Provide six (6) sets of water irrigation plans for Public Works
review and approval* prior• to issuance of irrigation permit. Permit fee $25.00.
All pipe shall be constructed with a minimum Class B bedding.
Provide all pipes with minimum cover.
Sincerely,
Phillip R. Fraser
Senior Engineer
PRF/ jai
cc: Al Pieper, Building Official"'.'
t
Tukwila Maintenance Offices
Al Pieper
Quildind Department
C'ty CO Tukwila
Re' Riverview Plaza, Bldg^ #2 (Foundii�tion Permit Only)
Dear A1
Althou�-.11 permit is for a foundation only, I wish to
m�ke comments relative t� the t�tal boildin� at this time^
Hopefully this will help to eliminate subsemuent problems�
1^ Reouired fire dampers shall be instal1ed per UBC
Standard #43-7~ (one-hour corridor)
y
2~ Per UFC
Section 12,104(b)v
EXIT doors
«-ihall bm openable
from thg inside
without the u�g
of mket:j Or
�Iny special
knowled�e or
effort,
3, Per UFC
Section 12°113(b),
at every reouired
exit
doorwa�-i, and
wherever otherwise
reouiped to
clea7ly indicate
the directioh
of
sisJn with
letA.r at lea�t
six inche� hiE-+1h
arid
be
m�:intained^
C S ti 2517 (f)
4. 'Walls, are�to be fire~stopP�d pGr UM on
5, Thii:� building is to be sPriDklered,
Hose �re recvuire pgr City Ordinar�g 1141^
(Plans must be submittgd to the Fire Marsh4� 1. for
appyoval prior to i�stal�ati�n^) (Lay�ut as sh#wn is
J, nademVate)
6^ All whall be prepared bu comPaPie1:
licensed to perform this type of Work^ i t-1 1:� shall firs�
be apProvgd b9 the Surveying a R@ti Bu11eau,
Factorg MUtua1 En�ine�rin� or Ind.Str�i-3l Risk IDs/ rGrSv then
by �h� Tukwila Fire D�p�rtmeDt^ Nu work ghall comNence
withoVt aPproVgd dr8wiri�.1s, {No /X�ePtion��
This offioe ia tc) bc.? c to witDeSs flushin� �f
un.er�r�Und piPin� zind 200 Presmure l
s� inklersy�tem pipin�+
mm
aty of Tukwila Fire Department, 444Andoyer Park East, Tukwila, Washington 981,88 (M) 575-4404
f
Frank Todd
J o b f Tukwila
d Mayor
I Hubert H. Crawley
Fire Department Fire Chief
i
I "I I,.11D b c..) T' 2
i
t"
7, l" .:I. T` C? (i? t'1.:1. I'15, I..I J. iii h e Y` S:! 9:• G' v 0 I "1 i3 1 "I'(; J. 'I', �•3 i3 I" 1 d p :1. iii C.` e In e r'I't: ii; 1'1 i3 1.1. L:1 e
N FVIA 0:1.0
n 1 J. 1 "1'1, c? T` :i. C) Y' W e 1. to c) v e Y` J. r1 .'A III u.t 1, e r J. z.3 :1. iii 11; iE3 :1.':i. be
T J. r iii" T` e ii) :I. i. i'1i J. V e or 19 1'1 ri l 1. b e 'Ii r e e l', e d b e
n
4D S '1: T` Cs 1;1..1 '1: J.1 "I c3 'r :I. r.31T1 C? Si P"' Y` iB ra T 13'1; :1. I "I fib Of' iii 1. e iii C3't. C::1, iii .i
C.I. r.31i iii :1: 1: Ca T` t: b( :L.'1: 4J iii f iii) A ti:' Y`'t. t I e '1' 1. iii ITI -2 1i P: T` ts? ii3 ci
f• Y` ii3'�, :L 1 "I Sit
:1.1:i m c I,.I :i..r e d '1: c). be 'd e :I.:i. v e Y� e ri' '1'. c) t'1 c:? 1" J. T` e
9 Prc)'1.c.-w'1: :i.ve i31..Iii3 d r t, ti oY c`I..IY`t.:1iii i.tT i d E;y i.Ir'Iri
Sid <3 m Ca 'i. (a Y' iii v 4a' :l. e '1: Y' J. c! iii 1. 't: r ii31 "1 1: 4 1` t:) Y` ITI e T` iii Y t:i) r :l. I "1 i <..i. T` V iii :l. v c. iii ii11 "1 d
1'1 !:3 (.1 T` 131'1'1: i i 1 (:)iii' is 13 I "I d c i..1 Y` b iii ri Y` c? '1. 1.7 i:3 J. I "1't: e I:.i
:I.U. 1= ?Y` Sec. :I.0o.309(c c)'1'. 'Uie., tJr1:i.'1'(aY'In f :'J. 1:•3:1.:1.
�f
5F Y` :I. I "I l "•.1. e T` ":i !:3 i a'I: t� IYI i W J. 1'1 ITI Y'(-'! 't',1'1 a 1 "1 :1.0 0 11 k! i3 ci iii to 1'1 iii :L 1. b e
i is 1 "I P c.) Y` V J: is a I:.i L:1 !i -i:) r i F3 P: f: r c) v e C:i C.) T`
i:i'I: ei I I "I ii G? T` V J. C.: (i? C) Y` <3 1, t:) C ?.iii, .L ii) 1. i3 Y` ITI W 1'1:1. c 1'1 w :i. :1. :1. S :1. v e 1:) r*i iE31"1 d A. b 1. e
n ai, 1, a l: a3 c? t:)1'•1 iii'I; r 31 "I't: a. !:1 ii3't:'1: G? 1 "I r.:i (a' C1 1. C) c` Fi3'1.:I. (a 1 "I (n F:' T (a v e d c e I "I'1: T` 1.11.
U 1 011 1: %3 Y` (i? '1:1'1 t:) iii t t: i'' L" i, b c) T` i.3't' J. a t.
L:� 3 L! r1 r:i c. r w r :i. 'l; c, r• i r r
u.
I '1',1'1C!,5s(i? "(?(:)IYIITLC'I "1'1.51. J. I' Y` "'T`c!va.ti ?w. c)'1' '1.1' e
i.' b c) v m L I U. i:) r e (.i P Y1(:) ..i c:� r., 't,
t I.J T`
1
r 1'1 e T k. W :L :I, i3 F :i. r t w "1 't, J. (a r'I D hI Pe i;31„1
C: C. a 1" 1".X.1 '1' J. :1.
t
I Gty.ot Tukwlla Fire, Department, 444 Andover Park Last, Tukwila, Washington 981 88"(208) 5754404
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CITY of TUKWILA
6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188
433 -1849
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT
DATED NO d I g f O (PERMIT NO. WHEN VALIDATED
JOB ADDRESS
LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT
DESCR.
OWNER rz�e TEG ri G o
ADDRESS G o
CONTRACTOR
ADDRESS
LICENSE NO ZZj Q/ 7-E G T o T S SST NO.
BUILDING USE O/° r-1 c S rF. U tib* 71/ U4,,J TENANT
RECEIVED
CITY OF 'TUK"L.A
NOV 2 01580
BULDW DEPT.
EXPIRES
X SEE ATTACHED SHEET
I PHONE Z 6 7 v
I �ZIP
PHONE Z 71 7 t/
ZIP
CLASS OF WORK ti Cor
XNEW ADDITION REMODEL REPAIR OTHER (Specify) t
BLDG. 1st FL. I 2nd FL. I BASEMENT I GARAGE I DECK I MEZZANINE I OF STORES I TOTAL S.F. VALUATION
AREA 6 /000kylto ko /1
00 I I'�j/3.�J�1 o, 00(l,Oa
NAME OF APPLICANT (PLEASE PRINT)
ADDRESS Z f 4/�-,4 yj�- TTe C_/L
L/ r-,4 vE: r G-A I PHONE Y/ r Ljy` S/? 9(
I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY MLISUE AND CORRECT AND THAT THE APPLICABLE CITY OF
TUKWILA REQUIREMENTS WILL BE MET.
SIGNATURE OF P NT
I 'TYPE CONST. I
N
PLAN PLANS:
RVW.
FIRE DEPT.
PLANNING/
SEPA
PUBLIC WKS.
OCC. GROUP
...3.
SENT
TOTAL F 7 V 7
COMMENTS:
I RECEIPT NO. I
APPROVED FOR INSURANCE BY:
noql
35'7'
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
4z=
OCC. LOAD I
FIRE ZONE I USE ZONE
AUTO SPRINKLERS
RqO. /Sr%,jWe 6tter
you I
I C �j
I YES NO
toe
D yes L7 Kes I
RETURNED I
APPROVED FEE
BUILDING
r�
0 /i U 0
DISTRIB.
PLAN RVW.
O to
I
DEMOLITION
BOND
OTHER
TOTAL F 7 V 7
COMMENTS:
I RECEIPT NO. I
APPROVED FOR INSURANCE BY:
noql
35'7'
r A DESCRIPTION REVISED LOT Z
That portion of the W.H. Gilliam Donation Land Claim No. 40 AND of the SW 1/4 of
the SW 1/4 of Section 24, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M., AND of Government Lot 1 in
Section 25, T. 23 N., R. 4 E.; W.M., in King County, Washington, more parti:ularly
described as follows!
BEGINNING at the SW corner of Parcel 1 of City of Tukwila Short Plat No.
78-16-SS as recorded under King County Recording No. 7906050098;
THENCE
N
00'14
W,
188.41 feet;
THENCE
S
89
E,
10.00 feet;
THENCE
N
00
W,
6.52 feet;
THENCE
N
10
W,
17.37 feet;
THENCE
S
63
E,
88.05 feet;
THENCE
S
42 0 04 1 00"
E,
70.22 feet;
THENCE
S
57 0 57 1 21"
E,
102.40 feet;
THENCE
S
84 °35
E,
121.50 feet;
THENCE
N
71 04 1 07"
E,
25.00 feet;
THENCE
S
02 °13
W,
106.77 feet;
THENCE N 87 0 46'23" W, 6.67 feet;
THENCE S 02 0 13 1 37" W, 0.99 feet to a point of curvature;
THENCE Southwesterly 25.15 feet along the are of a tangent curve to the right,
having a radius of feet, through a central angle of 72 03'23" to a point
of reverse curvature;
THENCE Southwesterly 6.86 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left,
having a radius of 62.00 feet, through a central angle of 06'20 to a point
on said curve;
THENCE S 06 W, 66.28 feet to a point of curvature;
THENCE Northwesterly 146.87 feet along the arc of a non tangent curve to the
right, having a radius of 935.00 feet, the radius point of which bears
N 06'32 E, through a central angle of 09 00 1 01" to a point on said curve;
THENCE S 15'32 W, 33.50 feet to a point of curvature;
THENCE Westerly 9.43 feet along the arc of a non tangent curve to the right,
having a radius of 968.50 feet, the radius point of which bears N 15'32 E,
through a central angle of 00'33 to a point on said curve;
THENCE• S 16 W, 20.97 feet;
THENCE
S
00'14
E,
34.00
feet;
THENCE
N
89'46
E,
29.50
feet;
THENCE S 00 E, 127.50 feet;
THENCE S 89'46 W, 69.00 feet;
THENCE S 00'14 E, 25.50 feet;
THENCE S 89'46 W, 115.50 feet to Point 'A';
THENCE N 00 W, 341.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT that portion thereof lying within the 30 foot City of Seattle Pipeline
Right- of- as recorded under King County A.F. No. 4106155.
Containing 2.47 acres, more or less.
Continued
..••1 Iy7e•r r. v. n,�h.w
SHEET 5 OF 8
LEGAL DESCRIPTION POR ISED LOT 2 CONT.
TOGETHER WITH a 24 foot ingress, egress and utilities easement, lying 12
feet on each side of the following described centerline:
COMMENCING at Point 'A' as described above;
THENCE S 00 E, 73.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of this centerline
description;
THENCE N 89 E, 46.50 feet to Point 'B';
THENCE continuing N 89'46'00" E, 69.00 feet to Point 'C';
THENCE continuing N 89 46'00" E, 69.00 feet to Point 'D';
THENCE continuing N 89 46 1 00" E, 12.50 feet to the end of this centerline
description.
ALSO TOGETHER WITH the following 25 foot ingress, egress and utilities
easements, lying 12.5 feet on each side of the following described center-
lines:
BEGINNING at Point 'B'; THENCE N 00 14 1 00" W, 73.00 feet to the end of this cen-
terline description.
BEGINNING at Point C' THENCE N 00 °14' 00" W, 98.50 feet to the end of this cen-
terline description.
BEGINNING at Point 'D'; THENCE N 00 14 1 00" W, 226.00 feet to the end of this
centerline description.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION REVISED LOT 3
That portion of Government Lot 1 in Section 25, T.23 N., R. 4E. W.M., in King
County, Washington, more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the SW corner of Parcel 4 of City of Tukwila Short Plat No.
78 -16 -SS as recorded under King County Recording No. .7906050098;
THENCE N 00'14 W, 210.00 feet to a point of curvature;
THENCE Northerly 104.72 feet along the arc of a non tangent curve to the left,
having a radius of 40.00 feet, the radius point of which bears N 00'14 W,
through a central angle of 150 00'00" to a point of reverse curvature;
THENCE Northerly 41.89 feet along the are of a tangent curve to the right,
having a radius of 40.00 feet, through a central angle of 60'00'00" to a point
of tangency;
THENCE N 00 W, 121.31 feet;
THENCE N 89'46 E, 115.50 feet;
THENCE N 00 W, 25.50 feet;
THENCE N 89 E, 69.00 feet;
THENCE S 00 E,' 17.00 feet;
THENCE N 89'46 I 29.50 feet;
THENCE N 00'14.00" W, 8.50 feet;
THENCE N 89'46 E, 24.61 feet;
THENCE S 60 E, 17.19 feet to Point 'E';
SHEET 6 OF 8
Continued
w u ..r �v .v.. M�r.x x�n.r rr ♦I..M w+� yr r...,... .n. .nr..w...w......e,.. rw✓• ✓w..w.r +v.I w.I wH.n .n M.....w......
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x