Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTIS 2026-05-28 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCITY OF TUKWILA Transportation & Infrastructure Services City Council Committee Special Meeting Thursday, May 28, 2026 at 5:30 p.m. Location: City Hall, Council Conference Room, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Join remotely: 1-253-292-9750, Access Code: 252508487# or click here to join virtually AGENDA 1. BUSINESS AGENDA a. Amendment 3 to Contract 24-028 with Herrera Consultants for the Enhanced Management Plan (EMP) Project. Sherry Equid, Levee Project Manager b. Legislation to Update Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 9.48 & 9.50 and Transportation Impact Fees (1) Ordinance to Repeal/Replace Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 9.48, Concurrency Standards & Transportation Impact Fees and TMC 9.50, Concurrency Management (2) Resolution to Amend Transportation Impact Fee Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager - Transportation c. Resolution Adopting Six -year Transportation Improvement Program (2027-2032) Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager - Transportation 2. MISCELLANEOUS Recommended Action Forward to 06/01 Pg. 2 Regular Meeting Forward to 06/08 COW & 06/15 Regular Meeting Pg. 10 Pg. 12 Pg. 39 Forward to 06/08 Pg. 97 COW & 06/15 Regular Meeting City of Tukwila Thomas McLeod, Mayor Marty Wine, City Administrator AGENDA BILL ITEM NO. 1.A. Agenda Item Sponsor Enhanced Maintenance Plan — Amendment #3 Sherry Edquid, Levee Project Manager Legislative History May 28, 2026 Transportation & Infrastructure Services Committee June 1, 2026 Regular Meeting Recommended Motion ❑ Discussion Only ❑x Action Requested MOVE TO authorize the mayor to sign Amendment #3 to Contract # 24-028 with Herrera Environmental Consultants for the increased scope of work for the Enhanced Management Plan in the amount of $19, 989.00. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Council action is requested to authorize the City to amend the existing professional services agreement with Herrera Environmental Consultants (Contract 24-028). Staff is requesting this item be moved to the June 1, 2026 Regular Meeting Consent Agenda. DISCUSSION In 2023, the City received a Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) grant that included the design of a decant facility. The grant requires us to develop an Enhanced Maintenance Plan (EMP) that demonstrates the need for a decant facility and ways that it would improve water quality. Herrera Environmental Consultants is writing a report that identifies ways that water quality can be improved by exceeding standard stormwater maintenance requirements as part of our municipal stormwater permit (NPDES). Ecology is asking for additional information to be included in the report The original contract was authorized by the Council on March 4, 2024. Since that date two amendments have been executed including: Amendment 1 to extend the term length and Amendment 2 included both a term extension and increase of $10,000.00. The proposed Amendment 3 is to add the additional scope to the project and increased compensation of $19,989.00. FINANCIAL IMPACT Complete for all items with fiscal implications Disclaimer: Final terms and scope of work subject to review by the City Attorney © Expenditure - Budgeted Expenditures: Fund Source: $19,989.00 (Amendment 3) $16,990 (Ecology Grant) $2,999 (Surface Water Enterprise Fund) • Expenditure - Unbudgeted In Expenditure - Grant -Funded • Revenue — One -Time (e.g. asset sale, surplus equipment) • Revenue - Ongoing 2 Contractor (if applicable) Herrera Environmental Consultants Scope of Work Further research, updating the report, responding to Ecology comments, and possibly meeting with Ecology. Amount New Contract total of $147,041.00 Duration 12/31/26 Additional Comments: ATTACHMENTS Amendment #3 Scope Amendment 3 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 Agreement Number: 24-028 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES Amendment # 3 Between the City of Tukwila and Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. That portion of Contract No. 24-028 between the City of Tukwila and Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. is hereby amended as follows: Section 2: Scope of Services Section 2 is hereby amended to read as follows: The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies Section 4: Payment Section 4A is hereby amended to read as follows: Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit A attached hereto, provided the total amount of payment to the Consultant for the work shall not exceed $19,989 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. The maximum amount payable under this contract as amended inclusive of all fees and other costs shall not exceed $147,041.00 without express written modifications of the Agreement signed by the City. All other provisions of the contract shall remain in full force and effect. Dated this 5th day of May, 2026. 4 CA Reviewed May 2020 Page 1 of 2 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 ** City signatures to be obtained by City Clerk's Staff ONLY. ** CITY OF TUKWILA Thomas McLeod, Mayor ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Andy Youn, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney Agreement Number: 24-028 ** Contractor signature to be obtained by sponsor staff. ** CONTRACTOR: Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. By: Printed Name: Title: Theresa M. Wood Vice President CA Reviewed May 2020 Page 2 of 2 5 EXHIBIT A �HERRERA Science + Planning + Design SCOPE AMENDMENT CITY OF TUKWILA ENHANCED MAINTENANCE PLAN On April 13, 2026, the City of Tukwila (City) authorized Herrera Environmental Consultants (Herrera) to prepare a scope, budget, and schedule amendment for the Enhanced Maintenance Plan (EMP) in accordance with the grant agreement between the City and the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) to help inform the City's future operational approach to stormwater management with the overall goal of improving water quality by removing sediment and pollutants from roadway runoff. This scope of work includes a discussion of the activities, assumptions, deliverables, and a schedule associated with the following tasks for this project: • Task 1 — Project Management • Task 2 — Stormwater Maintenance Program Evaluation • Task 3 — Enhanced Maintenance Program Development Task 1 - Project Management Herrera will be responsible for ongoing administration of the project, including preparing invoices and progress reports, as well as coordination of work efforts with the City project manager (Sherry Edquid). Herrera's project manager (Rebecca Dugopolski) and contract manager will have phone and e-mail contact with the City project manager and other City representatives on an as -needed basis with regard to scope, schedule, budget, and invoicing issues. Herrera's project manager will be responsible for ongoing administration of the project, including preparing invoices and progress reports, as well as coordination of work efforts with the City and subconsultants. Assumptions • This task does not include routine project management check -in meetings. Working meetings are included as part of Task 3. Deliverables • Monthly progress reports and invoices (PDF) April 27, 2026 se tukwila_emp_scope_amendment3 Page 1 of 3 (.4fr HERRERA 6 SCOPE AMENDMENT Task 2 - Stormwater Maintenance Program Evaluation Subtask 2.4 — Prepare Data Gaps and Needs Assessment The Herrera team will finalize the Data Gaps and Needs Assessment technical memorandum. The technical memorandum will document the City's existing stormwater program and identify gaps in the program as defined by the 2024-2029 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II municipal stormwater permit (Phase II permit). Assumptions • Herrera will update the Data Gaps and Needs Assessment technical memorandum based on any updates to the EMP in Task 3. • This task does not include a review by the City or any working meetings. • This task does not include assistance with code amendments, policy updates, or design standard updates necessary to implement new programs (if applicable) or to meet new Phase II permit requirements. Deliverables • Final gap analysis and needs assessment technical memorandum for Subtask 2.4 (Word and PDF) Task 3 - Enhanced Maintenance Plan Development The Herrera team will work with the City to develop an EMP that addresses Ecology's comments from March 2026 that is focused on the following topics: • Lifecycle costs for the street sweeper, vactor truck, and decant facility • Elaboration on how the street sweeper, vactor truck, and decant facility will provide additional water quality benefits Assumptions • Two virtual working meetings will be scheduled with the City (up to 1 hour each) to develop the draft EMP and discuss Ecology's comments. • The draft EMP will be reviewed by the City. The revised draft EMP will be reviewed by Ecology (per the City's grant agreement with Ecology). May 4, 2026 se tukwila_emp_scope_amendment3 2 of 3 (4i HERRERA 7 SCOPE AMENDMENT • The City will be responsible for posting the revised draft and final EMP to EAGL for Ecology's review. • Ecology will provide an acceptance letter once their review of the EMP has been completed. Deliverables • Draft (Internal Review Draft), revised draft (Ecology Review Draft), and final EMP (Microsoft Word and PDF) • Responses to Ecology's comments on the revised draft EMP (Microsoft Excel) Project Schedule Task Deliverable/Meeting Timeline Task 1— Project Mana ement lg Monthly invoices and progress reports May — Nov. 2026 Task 2 — Stormwater Maintenance Program Evaluation Subtask 2.4 — Prepare Data Gaps and Needs Assessment Final gap analysis and needs assessment technical memorandum Nov. 2026 Task 3 — Enhanced Maintenance Plan Development Draft EMP (for City review) July 2026 Virtual working meeting #1 July 2026 Revised draft EMP (for Ecology review) Aug. 2026 Virtual working meeting #2 Sept. 2026 Responses to Ecology's comments on revised draft EMP Oct. 2026 Final EMP Oct. 2026 a The proposed project timeline assumes that the notice to proceed will be issued on May 18, 2026 or sooner. May 4, 2026 3 of 3 se tukwila_emp_scope_amendment3 (.4fr HERRERA 8 (4HERRERA Cost Estimate for City of Tukwila Enhanced Maintenance Plan - Amendment 3 Herrera Project No. 23-08291-000 4/27/2026 Herrera Labor based on: Schedule Burdened Labor Rates Task No. Task Start Date Task End Date Staff Labor Category 2026 Burdened Labor Rates Dugopolski, Rebecca Engineer VI Chechanover, Julianne Engineer IV Jackowich, Pamela Administrative Coordinator IV Maloof, Charles Project Accountant III $293.07 $192.59 $150.50 $145.56 Total Hours per Task Subtotal Labor Subtotal Herrera Labor Grand Subtotal Grand Total 1 Project Management 2 Stormwater Maintenance Program Evaluation 3 Enhanced Maintenance Plan Development 5/18/2026 11/30/2026 2 4 4 10 $1,939 $1,939 10/1/2026 11/30/2026 5/18/2026 11/30/2026 Ain 2 14 18 4 56 64 4 10 $1,959 $1,959 8 12 4 78 98 $16,092 $19,989 $16,092 $19,989 $1,939 r $1,959 $16,092 [ $19,989 $19,989 Note: Herrera adjusts labor rates annually in January unless contract specifies otherwise. 9 City of Tukwila Thomas McLeod, Mayor Marty Wine, City Administrator AGENDA BILL ITEM NO. 1.B. Agenda Item Sponsor Legislative History May 28, 2026 Transportation & Infrastructure Services Committee June 8, 2026 Committee of the Whole June 15, 2026 Regular Meeting Recommended Motion ❑ Discussion Only ❑x Action Requested MOVE TO adopt an ordinance repealing and replacing Chapters 9.48 and 9.50 of the Tukwila Municipal Code. Adopt a resolution updating the Citywide Consolidated Permit Fee Schedule for 2025 and 2026. Transportation Impact Fees & Concurrency Updates Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager - Transportation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY New growth projections and transportation level of service standards, adopted in December 2024 as part of the Comprehensive Plan update, introduced a new multi -modal element required by changes in state law as well as Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). These changes require both updates to the Tukwila Municipal Code, chapters 9.48 and 9.50, and updates to the Transportation Impact Fee and Concurrency Review Fee. Upon reviewing the code section, additional changes are proposed to address inconsistencies between code language and actual practice, clarification of some sections, and general housekeeping. DISCUSSION As part of the most recent update to the City's Comprehensive Plan, and specifically the Transportation Element (TE), growth models predicting changes in population and employment were updated to the 2044 horizon year. The TE modeled the impacts to the City's current transportation network as well as introduced a new requirement to measure multi -modal level of service (MMLOS) — a way to determine existing and future congestion/available capacity for more growth in trips. Adopting this new MMLOS has expanded Tukwila's transportation network to include pedestrian and bicycle capacity as stand- alone needs instead of focusing solely on vehicular transportation. This significant change in approach along with accommodating future growth in the transportation network created a new list of needed capital improvement projects. A new Transportation Impact Fee schedule (TIF) has been developed to include the new capital project needs and updated project cost estimates. Needed projects on the TIF project list include streets, sidewalks, and bicycle facilities. The TE update established some boundary changes to the TIF zones. When Tukwila first established impact fees in 2005, a zone map was created dividing the City into four zones with a fifth zone overlaying the entire City providing for signal interconnectivity. The zones ensure that the TIF is funding projects that are reasonably related to new development, a key requirement in the 1990 Growth Management Act and subsequent legal challenges to the definition of what is a reasonable nexus. Over time, the first zone map has worked well, but changes in some boundaries between the zones for clarity and to better reflect travel within and between zones warranted some boundary changes. The new TIF zones were established in the TE updated and the TIF project list has been revised to reflect the new boundaries. 10 In the past, the TIF schedule has been adopted via ordinance modifying Table 9-1 in TMC 9.48. The attached proposed ordinance removes the 9-1 Table and delegates authority to the Public Works Director to establish administrative rules and procedures to implement TIFs, including routine updates. The attached proposed resolution incorporates the updated TIF schedule into the Citywide Consolidated Permit Fee Schedule and updates the Concurrency Review Fee table. Additional changes to TMC 9.48 and 9.50 have also been incorporated such as updating language to reflect current state law and actual City practice, remove unnecessary language, and clarify unclear language. Because the changes to the two chapters became significant, a "repeal and replace" approach is recommended. The attached redline version shows the changes between the existing code and the proposed code. Routine monitoring of the City's transportation network has been done in the past, but will be required to be done more frequently with the advent of the MMLOS standard. The first Concurrency Report, covering 2025 through 2031 is attached. The report is an important tool for Tukwila to ensure the City is maintaining the transportation network at an acceptable level of service as well as to aid in planning and funding necessary capital projects to accommodate new growth. With the exception of the Southcenter Boulevard/I-405 SB Off Ramp intersection, the vehicle level of service standard is being met. By 2031, two more intersections are projected to fail: Klickitat Drive/SR 518 EB Ramps and S 133' Street/SR 599 SB Ramps. All three intersections are within WSDOT limited access and are technically not subject to the City's MMLOS standard, but all three have already been identified as needs for Tukwila. The future Lake to Sound trail under design by King County Parks may address the Southcenter Boulevard intersection within the next few years but the other two will require coordination with WSDOT. Non -motorized level of service standards are also currently being met and will continue to do so by 2031 with construction of some high -priority projects included on the new TIF project list. FINANCIAL IMPACT Revenue associated with collection of Transportation Impact Fees charged to new development is restricted funding only projects on the TIF list. Revenue associated with the Concurrency Review Fee is intended to be used only for future Transportation Element updates and routine Concurrency Reports. ATTACHMENTS A. Draft Ordinance B. Draft Resolution C. Rate Study D. PowerPoint Slides 11 Attachment A DRAFT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTERS 9.48 AND 9.50 OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE; UPDATING AND REVISING LANGUAGE TO REFLECT CHANGES IN STATE LAW AND THE CITY'S 2024 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Washington State updated the 1990 Growth Management Act (GMA) with new requirements for cities and counties required to plan under the GMA; and WHEREAS, via Ordinance No. 2753, approved by the City Council on December 16, 2024, the City of Tukwila ("City") adopted a significant update to the City's Comprehensive Plan, including an updated Transportation Element; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a new multimodal level of service standard as part of the Transportation Element; and WHEREAS, a new transportation impact fee and transportation concurrency standard is required to be codified in the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC); and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to repeal and replace chapters 9.48 and 9.50 of the Tukwila Municipal Code as set forth in this Ordinance and Exhibits A and B attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Repealer. Ordinance 2111 as codified in TMC Chapter 9.48 "Concurrency Standards and Transportation Impact Fees", is hereby repealed, thereby eliminating this chapter in its entirety. CHAPTER 9.48 CONCURRENCY STANDARFDS AND TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES 12 2026 Legislation: Replace TMC 9.48 & 9.50 TMC Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Page 1 of 4 Sections: 9.48.010 Authority and Purpose. 9.48.020 Definitions. 9.48.030 Imposition of Transportation Impact Fees. 9.48.040 Calculation of Impact Fees. 9.48.050 Credit. 9.48.060 Time of Payment of Impact Fees. 9.48.070 Adjustments. 9.48.080 Establishment of Impact Fee Amount. 9.48.090 Use of Impact Fees. 9.48.095 Transportation Impact Fee Deferral. 9.48.100 Plan and Fee Update. 9.48.110 Refunds. 9.48.120 Appeals. 9.48.125 Exemptions. 9.48.130 Residential Impact Fee Deferral. 9.48.150 Authority Unimpaired. 9.48.160 Relationship to SEPA. Section 2. Replaced. TMC Chapter 9.48, "Transportation Impact Fees" of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby reenacted to read as follows: CHAPTER 9.48 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES Sections: 9.48.010 Authority and Purpose. 9.48.020 Purpose. 9.48.030 Imposition of Transportation Impact Fees. 9.48.040 Calculation of Impact Fees. 9.48.050 Credit. 9.48.060 Adjustments. 9.48.070 Time of Payment of Transportation Impact Fees. 9.48.080 Establishment of Transportation Impact Fee Amount. 9.48.090 Use of Transportation Impact Fees. 9.48.100 Plan and Fee Update. 9.48.110 Refunds. 9.48.120 Appeals. 9.48.130 Applicability. 9.48.140 Residential Transportation Impact Fee Deferral. 9.48.150 Authority Unimpaired. 9.48.160 Relationship to SEPA. 9.48.170 Delegation. 2026 Legislation: Replace TMC 9.48 & 9.50 TMC Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Page 2 of 4 13 Section 3. Chapter Established. All chapters of TMC Chapter 9.48 are hereby established to read as referenced in Exhibit A. Section 4. Repealer. Ordinance 2635 as codified in TMC Chapter 9.50 "Concurrency Standards and Transportation Impact Fees", is hereby repealed, thereby eliminating this chapter in its entirety. CHAPTER 9.50 CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT Sections: 9.50.010 Purpose. 9.50.020 Definitions. 9.50.030 Concurrency Test. 9.50.040 Test Criteria. 9.50.050 Concurrency for Phased Development. 9.50.060 Exemptions. 9.50.070 Vesting. 9.50.080 Improvements to Concurrency Facilities. 9.50.090 Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program. 9.50.100 Intergovernmental Coordination. 9.50.110 Administrative Rules and Procedures. 9.50.120 Appeals. 9.50.130 SEPA Exemption. Section 5. Replaced. TMC Chapter 9.50, "Concurrency Management", of the Tukwila Municipal Code hereby reenacted to read as follows: CHAPTER 9.50 CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT Sections: 9.50.010 Purpose. 9.50.020 Definitions. 9.50.030 Transportation Concurrency Review. 9.50.040 Review Criteria. 9.50.050 Transportation Concurrency for Phased Development and Rezones. 9.50.060 Development Accounted for in the Model. 9.50.080 Improvements to Transportation Facilities. 9.50.090 Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program. 9.50.110 Administrative Rules and Procedures. 9.50.120 Appeals. 9.50.130 SEPA Exemption. 14 2026 Legislation: Replace TMC 9.48 & 9.50 TMC Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Page 3 of 4 Section 6. Chapter Established. All chapters of TMC Chapter 9.50 are hereby established to read as referenced in Exhibit B. Section 7. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser Authorized. Upon approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this Ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering and section/subsection numbering. Section 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 9. Effective Date. This Ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City and shall take effect and be in full force effective October 14, 2026, after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2026. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Andy Youn-Barnett, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney Thomas McLeod, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: Exhibit A — TMC Chapter 9.48, Transportation Impact Fees Exhibit B — TMC Chapter 9.50, Concurrency Management 2026 Legislation: Replace TMC 9.48 & 9.50 TMC Version: 05/18/26 Staff: C. Knighton, H. Greenwood Page 4 of 4 15 Exhibit A CHAPTER 9.48 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES § 9.48.010. Authority and Purpose. A. Authority. The City of Tukwila's transportation impact fee financing program has been developed pursuant to the City of Tukwila's police powers, the Growth Management Act as codified in Chapter 36.-70A of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), the enabling authority in RCW Chapter 82.02; RCW, Chapter 58.17 RCW relating to platting and subdivisions and the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), and RCW Chapter 4243.12C RCW. B. Purpose. The purpose of the financing plan is to: 1. Develop a program consistent with Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan, the Six -Year Transportation Program and the Capital Improvement Program, for joint public and private financing of transportation improvements necessitated in whole or in part by development within the City of Tukwila; 2. Ensure adequate levels of transportation and traffic service consistent with the level of service identified in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan; 2,3. Create a mechanism to charge and collect fees to ensure that new development bears its proportionate share of the capital costs of transportation facilities necessitated by new development; and 3:4. Ensure fair collection and administration of such transportation impact fees. WC. The provisions of the City of Tukwila's transportation impact fee ordinance shall be liberally construed to effectively carry out its purpose in the interests of the public health, safety and welfare. § 9.48.020. Definitions. The words and terms contained in this chapter shall have the following meanings for the purposes of this chapter, unless the context clearly requires otherwise. Terms or words not defined herein shall be defined pursuant to RCW 82.02.090 when. Terms not defined herein and RCW 82.02.090 shall be given their usual and customary meaning. 1. "Act" m ans the Growth Management Act, Chapter 17, Laws of 1990, First Extraordinary Session, Chapter 36.70A RCW et seq., and Chapter 32, Laws of 9-94 First Special Sec ion as now in ce or h inafter am�Fed���,�c��s,�,T-�-„�-�,Te�casten �-�,Terer�-��,T 2 A. "Building permit" means an official document or certification of the City of Tukwila issued by the City's building official which authorizes the construction, alteration, enlargement, conversion, reconstruction, remodeling, rehabilitation, erection, placement, demolition, moving, or repair of a building or structure. 16 B. "City" means the City of Tukwila, Washington. 3:C. 4 "Development" means theany construction, reconstruction, conversion, structural alteration, relocation or cnlargementexpansior of anya building, structure, or any changes in the use of the land that requires a building permit "Development activity' means any construction of a building or structure that and creates additional demand and need for transportation facilities. "Development apnreyal earni-ss an—ca wr--iitten authrnTzation fir rrGna-the--City w ich au rizes the commencement" does not include: (a) buildings or structures constructed by a regional transit authority or (b) buildings or structures constructed as shelters that provide emergency housing for people experiencing homelessness or emergency shelters for victims of the "development activity."domestic violence as defined in RCW 70.123.020. 6,D. "Early learning facility" is defined consistent with RCW 43.31.565(3) as now enacted or hereafter amended. E. f'Fee payer"" is a person, corporation, partnership, an incorporated association or governmental agency, municipality, or similar entity commencing a land development activity, which requires a building permit and creates a demand for additional facilities. activity pursuant to this chapter as a condition of granting development approval, in order to pay for the transportation facilities needed to serve new growth and development that is a proportionate share of the cost of the capital facilities that is used for facilities that reasonably benefit new development. 'Impact fccs aro administrative fcc for collecting and handling impact fees or cost of reviewing independent fee calculations. F. 10. "Letter encumbered"" means to reserve, set aside, or earmark the transportation impact fees in order to pay for commitments, contractual obligations, or other liabilities incurred for the provision of transportation facilities. G. 1-1-"Low-income housing"" means housing where monthly costs, including utilities other than telephone, do not exceed 30% percent of the resident's household monthly income and where household monthly income must be 80 percent or less of the King County Median family income adjusted for family size as reported by the U.-S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. H. 12"Owner"" means the owner of record of real property, as found in the records of King County, Washington, or a person with an unrestricted written option to purchase property; provided, that if the real property is being purchased under a recorded real estate contract, the purchaser shall be considered the owner of the property. I 4-Proportionate fair sharee' means that portion of the cost for transportation facility improvements that are reasonably related to the service demands and needs of new development. 17 §9.48.030. Imposition of Transportation Impact Fees. The City hereby authorizes the assessment and collection of transportation impact fees on development activity at the rates set forth in Figure 9 12_ § 9.48.040. Calculation of Transportation Impact Fees. A. The method of calculating the transportation impact fees in this chapter incorporate, among other things, the following: F1 impact fees imposedThe cost of public streets, roads, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities necessitated by this chapter.the development; 1. Shall only be imposed for system improvcmcnts that arc reasonably related to the new development; 2. Shall not exceed the proportionate fair share of the costs of system improvcmcnts that are reasonably related to the new development; 2. Shall be used for the systemAn adjustment to the costs of the public streets, roads, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities for past mitigation payments made by previous development on the property to pay for the same required transportation system improvements that would be covered by the transportation impact fee. 3. The availability of other means of funding public street, road, pedestrian, and bicycle facility improvements; and 4. The methods by which public streets, roads, and pedestrian and bicycle improvements that will reasonably benefit neware financed. 5. The current edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual and other city information, including, but not limited to, rate studies. 3,6. Information provided by the applicant and any publicly available information regarding the development;. The City may request additional information in order to properly assess the transportation impact fee. /I. May be collected and spent only for system improvements, which are provided for in the transportation element of the Capital Improvement Plan and Comprehensive Land Use Plan; 5. Shall not be used to correct existing transportation system deficiencies as of the date of adoption of this chanter• anrd e B. ShallFees for development shall be calculated based on their net new "daily person trip" generation rates as determined by the Public Works Director, or designee. If the development concerns an existing use on the same parcel, the fee shall be based on net -new trips generated by the development. 6 C. Impact fees shall be collected only once for each development, unless changes or 18 modifications to the development are proposed which result in greater direct impacts on transportation facilities than were considered when the development was first approved. § a 4Q 04n Calculation of Impact Fees among othcr things, the following: 1. The cost of public streets and roads necessitated by new development; 2. An adjustment to the costs of the public streets and roadways for past or futurc mitigation payments made by previous development to pay for a particular system improvement that was prorated to the particular street improvement; 3. The availability of other means of funding public street and roadway improvements; and 4. The methods by which public street anrd roadwa„ improvements were financed ITE Trip Generation Manual. If the proposed development activity concerns an existing use, the fee shall be based on net new trips generated by the redevelopment. If an existing building has not been used for its intended purpose or has been vacant for twelve months or more preceding application, no credit for existing trips shall be given. § 9.48.050. Credit. A credit, not to exceed the transportation impact fee otherwise payable, shall be provided for the fair market value of any dedication of land for, improvement to, or new construction of any system improvements provided by the developer; to facilities that are identified in the Capital Improvement ProgramTransportation Impact Fee project list and that are required as a condition of approving the development activity. The determination of !_"valuee_" shall be consistent with the assumptions and methodology used by the City Engineer in estimating the capital improvement costs._ § 9.48.060. Time of Payment of Impact fees A. The impact fees imposed pursuant to this chapter shall be assessed by the City at the time of the application for the development permit and shall be due and payable in full f pursuant to TMC Section 9.48.095. The fee paid shall be the amount in effect as of the date of the permit issuance. B. Impact fees may be paid under protest in order to obtain a permit or other approval of development activity. § 9.48.070. Adjustments. TheFor developments with land uses not included in the Transportation Impact Fee Schedule, the amount of fee to be imposed on a particular development may be adjusted by the Public Works Directorgiving. The adjustment, if granted, will give 19 consideration to studies and other data submitted by the developer demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that an adjustment should be made in order to carry out the purposes of this chapter. The Public Works Director shall review the study to determine if the adjustment request- 1. Is based on le City'F accepted impact fee assessment practices and methodologies; 42. Uses acceptable data sources and if the data used is comparable with the uses and intensities planned for the proposed development activity; 2,3_Complies with the applicable State laws governing impact fees; 3:4. Is prepared and documented by professionals who are mutually agreeable to the City and the developer and are qualified in their respective fields; and 45. Shows the basis upon which the independent fee calculation was made. In reviewing the study, the Public Works Director may require the developer to submit additional or different documentation. C. If the Public Works Director agrees with the study's findings,developer has not demonstrated through clear and convincing evidence that an adjustment to the impact fee willshould be made.. I compell-' Ease has Rot been made, the developer shall pay the full transportation impact fee amount. 9.48.070 impact fees imposed by this chapter to obtain a building permit while the City determines whether to partially reimburse the developer by making an adjustment or accepting the independent fee calculation. Time of Payment of Transportation Impact Fees. Transportation impact fees shall be due and payable in full at the time of issuance of a building permit unless deferred pursuant to TMC 9.48.130. The fee paid shall be the amount calculated by the Public Works Director, or designee, including any adjustments made pursuant to TMC 9.48.060, as of the date the permit is issued. § 9.48.080. Establishment of Transportation Impact Fee Account. ImpactTransportation impact fees received pursuant to this chapter shall be rmarked dedicated revenues and retained in a special interest -bearing accounts . All interest shall be retained in the account and expended for the purpose or purposes for which the transportation impact fees were collected. § 9.48.090. Use of Transportatic Impact Fees. A. Pursuant to this chapter, transpui wool I impact fees shall be used for transportation 20 facilities that will reasonably benefit the City and its residcntsdevelopment. B. FcccTransportation impact fees shall not be used to make up for existing deficiencies in City facilities serving an existing development_. C. Feet -)Transportation impact fees shall not be used for maintenance and operations, including personnel. D. TrafficTransportation impact fees shaf4may be used for., but not limited to land acquisition, site improvements, engineering and architectural services, permitting, financing, administrative expenses and applicable mitigation costs, and capital equipment pertaining to transportation systems and facilities. E. TrafficTransportation impact fees may also be used to recoup public improvement costs incurred by the City to the extent that new growth and development will be served by the previously constructed improvement. F. In the event bonds or similar debt instruments are or have been issued for transportation system improvements, transportation impact fees may be used to pay the principaldebt service on such bonds. G. Transportation impact fees shall be expended or letter encumbered for a permissible use within ten years of receipt, unless there exists an extraordinary or compelling reason for fees to be held longer than ten years. The Public Works Director may recommend to the Council that the City hold fees beyond ten years in cases whcrcwhen extraordinary or compelling reasons exist. Such reasons shall be identified in written findings by the Council. H. The Finance Director shall prepare an annual report on the transportation impact fee account showing the source and amount of all moneys collected, earned or received and projects that were financed in whole or in part by transportation impact fees. § 9.48.095 Transportation Impact100. Plan and Fee Defvc�crrraalUpdate. A. In order to encourage residential and mixed use development withinThe transportation impact fee schedule may be updated annually by applying the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Oriented Development (TUC TOD) zoning district, fee deferrals of all or a portion of the required transportation impact fees Mortenson Construction Cost Index for a project may be granted providcd the following criteria are met: 1. The property owner must submit a technically complete building permit application clearly depicting the project for which the fee deferral agreement would apply. 2. Before issuance of the building permit, the property owner must submit a written letter requesting that the transportation impact fee be deferred. The City will not consider any fee deferral requests from a tenant contractor or other third party, The request must be submitted to the City no later than December 31, 2016. 8T-he project m be Iocafed west of the Green r and be within the T C�v TOD zoning district per Figure 18 16, District Map, in Title 1 8 of the Tukwila Municipal Code. 21 /1. The project must include at least 100 residential units and at least 50 percent of the gro-s building square footage must be used for residential purposes. For purposes of this section, the term "residential" does not include hotels, motels, bed and breakfasts or other similar transient accommodations. 5. A fee deferral agrccmcnt between thc City and thc property owncr must be executed prior to issuance of the building permit. The Mayor is authorized to execute such agreementsSeattle. Once every two years, projects on behalf of thc r't.Droyi s mi-rut be—in--c tided rtheee agrermenr-to secure payment ef- the deferred impact fees, plus accrued interest, in the case of default by the property owner. Provisionsthe Transportation Impact Fee list may incl„do b„t are n„t limited to, a lien against subject property, letter of credit and/or surety bond. 6. As part of the agreement, the property owner must agree to waive any appeals under TMC Section 9/18.120. B. The Mayor maw -consider other relevant information in approving fee deferral requestsbe updated to address changed conditions including, but not limited to, the ability of thc property owner to satisfy thc obligations of thc agreement and pay the deferred act fees e Mayor isauthorized tear ode anyother prov,sions or requirements in the deferral agreement that he/she deems necessary to meet the intent welfare. C. Transportation impact fees may be deferred up to 1 0 years from the date of building permit issuance. The property owner shall make 8 equal, annual installment payments to the City, with the first payment due to the City no later than 3 6 months after issuance of the building permit, with the final payment being due no later than 1 20 months from issuance of the building permit. The property owner may pay off the entire balance any time prior to the end of the 1 0 year deferral term. D. Interest shall be charged on deferred transportation impact fees. The interest rate shall be the same as the stated interest rate on thc Tcn Y r US Trc,sury Note on thc date annually and shall begin to accrue upon issuance of the building permit. E. The transportation impact fee deferral agreement may be consolidated with any agreements to defer fire, parks, or building permit fccs as outlined in TMC Chaptcrs 16. 26 6 and tho lida4 n , ee resolution adopt by y Ganro. ��Eer�se„�� �en� �o,�,—��� —�+t� Council. § 9/18.1 00. Plan and Fee Update. The impact fee may be updated annually to evaluate the consistency of development density assumptions estimatedgrowth patterns, project costs, and grant funding, if any. Updates that result in a change in transportation impact fees will be reviewed by the City Council. Impact fee changes will only occur through an ordinancca resolution requiring Council action. § 9.48.110. Refunds. 22 A. A developer may request and shall receive a refund when the developer does not proceed with the development activity for which transportation impact fees were paid, and the developer shows that no impact has resulted. The developer must submit a request for a refund to the City in writing within one year of the expiration of the development permit as defined in TMC 9.50.020 or the building permit. B. Any transportation impact fees that are not expended or encumbered within the time limitations established, and for which no application for a refund has been made within thisa one-year period of the notice required by RCW 28.02.080 as amended, shall be retained and expended on any project identified in the Capital Improvement PlanTransportation Impact Fee Project List. C. In the event that transportation impact fees must be refunded for any reason, they shall be refunded with interest earned to the applicant. § 9.48.120. Appeals. A. Any fee payer seeking to appeal a transportation impact fee imposed by the City may file an appeal as provided in Chapters 18.104 and 18.116 TMC for Type 2 decisions. A. Any fee payer may pay the impact fees imposed by this chapter under protest in order to obtain a building permit- B. Appeals regarding traffic impact fees imposed on any development activity may only be taken by the fee payer of the property where such development activity will occur. No appeal shall be permitted unless and until the impact fee at issue has been paid. C. Determinations of thc Public Works Dircctor or his dcsigncc, with respect to the applicability of traffic impact fees to a given development activity, or the availability of a crcdit, can be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner. Such appeal shall be a closed record while an appeal- D. An appeal shall be taken within 1 0 working days of payment of the impact fees under protest or within 1 0 working days of the City's issuance of a written determination of a nic•ion by filing with the C' y Cl a noti l w ith an c� +�-e�e�cere� e�� �+t� �n ea� accompanying app al fcc, as set forth in thc existing fcc schedule for land use de isions. E. Notices of appeal shall contain the following information: 1. The name of the appealing party; 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in that decision. The notice of app al shall state spccific crrors of fact or errors in the application of thc law to thc facts presented and shall also state the relief sought. The scope of the appeal shall be limited to issues raised in the notice of appeal. B. §this section is pending. Should the appeal be successful, the City will refund any overpayment per TMC Section 9.48.125. Exemptions110. 23 § 9.48.130. Applicability. A. The transportation impact fees are generated from the formula for calculating thc fees as set forth in this chapter. The amount of thc impact fccs is dctcrmincd by the information depicted on Figure 9 1 herein.3calculated as set forth in the Citywide Consolidated Permit Fee Schedule. All development activity located within the City shall be charged a transportation impact fee, consistent with this chapter, provided that the following exemptions shall apply. B. The following shall be exempt from transportation impact fees: 1. Replacement of a structure with a new structure having the same use, at the same site, and with -the same -gross floor area, when such replacement is within 4224 months of -demolition or destruction of the previous structure. 2. Alteration, expansion, or remodeling of an existing dwelling or structure where no new unitsperson-trips are createdgenerated and the use is not changed. 3. Construction of an accessory residential structure, such as a garage, carport, shed or greenhouse, that does not generate additional person -trips. 4. Miscellaneous improvements including, but not limited to, fences, walls, swimming pools and signs that do not impact the transportation system. 5. Demolition of or moving an existing structure within the City from one site to anothersame parcel. 6. Transportation impact fees for the constructionConstruction of low-income housing mairnay be red{ ced at the �cr�on of the Dublin Worl� Diro r when -army vrr-vr-crlc-r-avrtv�rrn�c�vrrc requested by the property owner in writing prior to permit submittal and subject teunits will reduce the transportation impact fee per the following criteria: a C Submittal of a fiscal impact analysis of how afee reduction in impact fees for the project would contribute to the creation oftable. Impact fees for mixed -use or combined market rate and low-income development that includes low-income housing will be prorated based on the table below. 197 Fee reduction table. Unit Size Affordability Target' Fee Reduction 2 or more bedrooms 80%2 40% 2 or more bedrooms 60%2 60% Any size 50%2 80% Notes: Units to be sold or rented to a person or household whose monthly 24 housing costs, including utilities other than telephone, do not exceed 30% of the household' s monthly income. Percentage of King County Median family income adjusted for family size as reported by the U. S . Department of Housing and Urban Development. The developer must record a covenant per RCW 82.-02.-060(3-4) that prohibits using the property or the portion of the property that had reduced fees for any purpose other than for low-income housing at the original income limits for a period of at least 1 0 y arson a form approved by the City Attorney. At a minimum, the covenant must address price restrictions and household income limits for the low-income housing, and that if the property is converted to a use other than low-income housing within 1 0 years, the property owner must pay the City the applicable transportation impact fees in effect at the time of conversion. 7,D. Change of Use, or Occupancy. A development permit far a change of use or occupancy that has less impact than the —existing use shall not be assessed a transportation impact fee. &E. A fee payer required to pay for system improvements pursuant to RCW 43.21C.060 shall not also be required to pay aria transportation impact fee for the same improvements under this ordinance.. 9,F. An Early Learning Facility is exempt from paying 80 percent of the required Transportation Impact Fee. G. A fee payer is required to pay 50% of the transportation impact fee that is imposed for a single-family residence when constructing an accessory dwelling unit as defined in RCW 36.70A.696 as amended. § 9.48.430140. Residential Transportation Impact Fee Deferral. A. Purpose. amended by ESB5923 , Chapter 241 , Laws of 201 5 , to provide an impact fee deferral process for single family residential construction in order to promote economic recovery in the construction industry. B. Applicability. 1. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all impact fees established and adopted by the City pursuant to Chapter 82.02 RCW, including transportation system impact fees assessed under Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 9.48. 2. Subject to the limitations imposed in the Tukwila Municipal Code, the provisions of this chapter shall apply to all building permit applications for single family detached and single family attached residential construction. For the purposes of this controlled by the named applicant, or is under common control with the named applicant. C. Impact Fee Deferral. 25 A. Deferral Request Authorized.- 1. Applicants for single-family attached or single-family detached residential building permits may request to defer payment of required transportation impact fees until the sooner of: a. Final inspections or_ b. The closing of the first sale of the property occurring after the issuance of the applicable building permit which request shall be granted so long as the requirements of this chapter are satisfied. B. Method of Request.- 2,1. A request for transportation impact fee deferral shall be declared at the time of preliminary plat application (for platted development) or building permit application (for non -platted development) in writing on a form or forms provided by the City, along with applicable application fees. 2. 3—Calculation of Transportation Impact Fees. — The amount of transportation impact fees to be deferred under this chapter shall be determined as of the date the request for deferral is submitted. DC. Deferral Term. 1. The term of aria transportation impact fee deferral granted under this chapter may not exceed 18 months from the date the building permit is issued "Deferral Term" . If the condition triggering payment of the deferred transportation impact fees does not occur prior to the expiration of the Deferral Term, then full payment of the transportation impact fees shall be due on the last date of the Deferral Term. €D. Deferred Transportation Impact Fee Lien. 1. 1 . Appl+sa tIsApplicant's Duty to Record Lien. :An applicant requesting a deferral under this chapter must grant and record a deferred transportation impact fee lien, in an amount equal to the deferred transportation impact fees, against the property in favor of the City in accordance with the requirements of RCW 82.-02.-050(3-)(c). 2. Satisfaction of Lien. -Upon receipt of final payment of all deferred transportation impact fees for the property, the City shall execute a release of deferred transportation impact fee lien for the property. The property owner at the time of the release is responsible, at his or hertheir own expense, for recording the lien release. 1 E. Limitation on Deferrals. 1. The deferral entitlements allowed under this chapter shall be limited to the first 20 single-family residential construction building permits per applicant, as identified by contractor registration number or other unique identification number, per year. 26 § 9.48.150. Authority Unimpaired. Nothing in this chapter shall preclude the City from requiring the fee payer to mitigate adverse and environmental effects of a specific development pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, Chapters 43.21C RCW and/or Chapter 58.17 RCW, governing plats and subdivisions: provided, that the exercise of this authority is consistent with Chapters 43.21C and 82.02 RCW. § 9.48.160. Relationship to SEPA. A. All development shall be subject to environmental review pursuant to SEPA and other applicable City ordinances and regulations. B. Payment of the transportation impact fee pursuant to this chapter shall constitute satisfactory mitigation of those traffictransportation impacts related to the specific improvements identified on the project list. C. Further mitigation in addition to the transportation impact fee shall be required for identified adverse impacts, appropriate for mitigation pursuant to SEPA, that are not mitigated by an impact fee. D. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to limit the City' sCity's authority to deny development permits when a proposal would result in significant adverse traffictransportation impacts identified in an environmental impact statement and reasonable mitigation measures are insufficient to mitigate the identified impact. § 9.48.170 Delegation. The Public Works Director shall be authorized to establish administrative rules and procedures for administering the transportation impact fee program. The administrative rules and procedures shall include but not be limited to application forms, necessary submittal information, processing times, and calculation of transportation impact fees consistent with this chapter. 27 CHAPTER 9.50 CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT § 9.50.010. Purpose. Exhibit B A.Pursuant to the State Growth Management Act, RCWChapter 36.70A RCW, after the adoption of its Comprehensive Plan, the City of Tukwila is required by RCW 36.70A.070(6)(b) to ensure that transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of development are provided concurrent with the development. Further, the City is bound by the planning goals of RCW 36.70A.020 to adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards, hereinafter "concurrency." B. The intent of this chapter is to establish a transportation concurrency management system to ensure that transportation facilities and services needed to maintain minimum level of service standards can be provided simultaneous teconcurrent with, or within a r conable time after, development occupancy or use. Concurrency facilities adopted by the CityT s Comprehensive Plan are roads, potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water management. This chapter furthers the goals, policies and implementation strategies and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. A. six years of development. The transportation concurrency management system provides the necec•sary regulatory mechanism for evaluating requests for development to ensure that adequate concurrency facilities can be provided within a rgiasonable time of the_devel n ' pact The eeneurrenn y management system also provides a framework for determining transportation facilities and services needs and provides a basis for meeting those needs through capital facilities planning. DB. For water, sewer, and surface water, the facilities must be in place at the time of development approval and for roads, the facilities must be in place within six years of thetime-ef the development approval nppli an+t wiirh dey pmentasDevelopments that would cause the level of service en conc„rreneyfor transportation facilities to decline below City standards can have their developments may be approved byprovided they include implementing measures that offset t eifthe impacts and would maintain the City's standard for transportation level of service. § 9.50.020. Definitions. The definitions contained in TMC Section 9.-50.-020 apply throughout this chapter unless, from the context, another meaning is clearly intended. 1,A. "Adequate" means equal to or better than the level of service standards specified in the current adopted capital facilities elementplan. 28 2,B. "Applicant" means a person who applies for anya transportation concurrency certificate of concurrency under this chapter and who is the owner of the subject property or the authorized agent of the property owner. 3. "Available water, sewer, and surface water capacity" m ans thcrc is adequate capacity, based on adopted level of service standards, for water, sewer, and surface water facilities currently existing without requiring facility construction, expansion, or modification. /1. " "Building permit" refers to any permit issued under the Uniform Building Code. 29 Exhibit B 57C. "Certificate of concurrency" means the statement accompanying the Public Works Department' s development standards that are issued with an approved development permit or the Public Works Department' s conditions of approval that are issued with an approved Washington state adopted building permit. The statement shall state that a certificate of concurrency issued and indicate:code. arc available and reserved for thc specific uses, densities and intcnsitics as intensities ac described in the development permit or building permit• and d. An effective date; and c. An expiration date. "Concurrency" means transportation facilities or strategies that achieve the CiitCity's level of service standards an4or that: a. For water, sewer, surface water, and roads: facilities that cxist at thc time development is approved by the Public Works Department; or b. For roads: 041_Are included in the City's Capital Improvement Plan and on the Transportation Impact Fee project list at the time development is approved by the Public Works DepartmentCity; or (2)2. Will be available and complete no later than six years after completion of the development, and the applicant and/or the City provides a financial commitment which is in place at the time the development is approved by the Public Works Department. 7. ""Concurrency facilities" mean facilities for which nonnurrency is regi sired in e e , and surface water facilities. 8. "Concurrency testreview" means ,a For ter sewer and surface water, the comparison of a development' s demand to the available capacity of each concurrent y facility and 0 b. For roads, thc comparison of thc development' sthe development's impact on the level of service standards of each effected subarea. 30 E. subareas and the available capacity of the transportation facilities. A transportation concurrency testreview must be passed for roads, when applicable, and a notice issued by the Public Works Department in order to obtain a certificate ofwith the development permit or building permit as proof of transportation concurrency. 9,F. "Development permit" means a land use permit and include including short plat, preliminary or final rezone/reclassification, zoning permit, master plan, shoreline substantial development permit/conditional use permit, planned unit development, subdivision, or any other permit or approval under the Zoning Code or Subdivision Code or Shoreline Master Program. ""Financial commitment'commitment" means: a:1. Revenue sources are budgeted or anticipated to be available and designated for facilities in the Comprchcnsivccurrent Capital Improvement Plan; b. Unanticipated revenue from federal and state grants for which the City has received notice of approval; c 2.Funding that is assured by the applicant in a form approved by the Public Works Department. H. 11 ""Level of service ctandard'standard" means those standards specified in the adopted transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan. For water, sewer, and surface water, "level of service standard" also means those standards defined in TMG Title 1 . 12. "Non city managed facilities' include any non city provider of water or sewer. I. 13. ""Planned capacity'capacity" means roadtransportation facilities that do not currently exist but for which the necessary facility construction, expansion, or modification project is contained in the current capital facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan and is necessary for meeting the level of service standard. The improvements must be scheduled to be completed within six years and the financial commitment must be in place at the time of approval of the certificate oftransportation concurrency certificate to complete the improvements within six years. J. 14. ""Public works department'department" means the Public Works Director or designee. K. "Transportation concurrency certificate" means the statement accompanying the Public Works Department's development standards that are issued with an approved development permit or the Public Works Department's conditions of approval that are issued with an approved building permit. The statement shall state that a transportation concurrency certificate is issued and indicate: 1. The specific use(s), densities and intensities as described in the development permit or building permit are adequate; and 2. Conditions of approval, if applicable; and 3. An effective date; and 31 4. 15. "An expiration date. L. "Transportation strategies'concurrency facilities" means facilities for which concurrency is required in accordance with the provision of this chapter and includes roads, streets, sidewalks, and other transportation demand management strategies and other techniques or programs that reduce single occupant vehicle travelfacilities. M. 16. "Vested"'Vested" means the right to develop or continue development in accordance with the laws, rules, and other regulations in effect at the time the building permit application is deemed complete. § 9.50.030. Transportation Concurrency TestReview. A. A —Timing. All applicants must apply for the be issued a transportation concurrency test and receive notice of passing the test certificate before the City will approve an application for any development permit or building permit-, if no development permit is required. An application for a transportation concurrency testcertificate may be submitted with other development submittals. B. —Procedures. 4 Applications for a transportation concurrency testcertificate shall be submitted on forms provided by the Public Works Department. The transportation concurrency test shall be donccertificate review will be completed in order of ':first in, first out," once once the Public Works Department determines the application is complete. 2. The applicant shall provide to the Public Works Department a certificate of availability for watcr and sewer with the application submittal if the property is serviced by a non City managed utility. For City managed utilities, a determination n iill he made en availability and a certifi to of availability shall he issi i This ccTm�C-a an�c-r�vc�rnv certificate of availability shall suffice as meeting the concurrency test for water and sewer utilities. 1. The applicant shall submit a detailed project description of the development, including location, vehicular circulationsite plan, and gross floor area by use, as part of the transportation concurrency certificate application. 3.A transportation concurrency application and shall pay the concurrcncy tcst fcc as adoptcd by motion or resolution of the Tukwila City Council. 42. A concurrency testreview shall be performed only for specific property, uses, densities and intensities based on the information provided by the applicant. The applicant shall specify densities and intensities that are consistent with the uses allowed for the property. If the concurrency testreview is being requested in conjunction with an application for rezone, the applicant shall specify densities and intensities that are consistent with the proposed zoning for the property. Changes to the 312 uses, densities and intensities that create additional impacts on concurrency transportation facilities shall be subject to an additional transportation concurrency testreview. 5:3. The Public Works Director or designee shall perform the concurrency testreview. The project must pass thcreceive a transportation concurrency testcertificate prior to approval of the development permit or building permit. 6 4. The Public Works Director or designee shall notify the applicant of the testreview results in writing. The date of written notification to the applicant shall be the date of issuance of the transportation concurrency certificate. 7,5. The transportation concurrency certificate, other than a transportation concurrency certificate for a phased development or a rezone, shall expire within one year of its issuance unless the applicant submits a building permit application, a SEPA environmental checklist and all required documentation pursuant to TMC Chapter 21.04 TMC, or an extension is granted within one year from the date of issuance of the transportation concurrency certificate. 8,6. If the deadline for submittal of a complete building permit application, SEPA environmental checklist and all required documentation, is met as described in TMC Section 9.50.030. B.7, or other submittal as determined by -the Public Works Director or designee, thctransportation concurrency certificate, other than a certificate for a rezone or phased development, shall be valid for two years from the date of issuance of the building permit, SEPA Determination, or other City -issued approval. If the building permit, SEPA environmental checklist, or other submittal is withdrawn by the applicant prior to approval by the City or expires, the transportation concurrency certificate shall expire one year after the date of issuance. 9,7. An applicant must apply for a new transportation concurrency testcertificate if the certificate expires or an extension is not granted. 1-0—The Public Works Director may approve anone extension of up to one year if; a8. The the applicant submits a letter in writing requesting the extension before the expiration date. The applicant must show that they arcthe applicant is not responsible for the delay in obtaining a building permit, SEPA approval, or other City -issued approval, and has acted in good faith to obtain the permit or approval, and b. If the property is serviced by a non City managed utility, then the applicant must submit a letter from the utility approving the extension before the expiration date. 9. 11. The Public Works Department shall be responsible for accumulating the impacts created by each application and removing any impacts from the CitCity's concurrency records for an expired transportation concurrency certificate, an expired development permit or building permit, or other action resulting in an applicant no longer causing impacts that have been accounted for in the City records. 33 12. The Public Works Department shall be responsible to coordinate with applicable non City managed utility operators for maintenance and monitoring of available and planned capacity for these utilities. 10. 13 . A certificate oftransportation concurrency certificate shall apply only to the approved specific land use, density and intensity described in the application fora development permit er building permit _ No development shall be required to obtain more than one certificate oftransportation concurrency certificate for each building, unless the applicant or subsequent owner proposes changes or modifications to the property location, density, intensity, or land use that creates additional impacts on concurrencytransportation facilities. 11. 1 /1. A transportation concurrency certificate of concurrency is not transferable to other land but may be transferred to new owners of the original land. § 9.50.040. TestReview Criteria. Development Transportation concurrency certificate applications that would result in a transportation level of service reduction below the adopted standard shall not be approved. 1. For water and sanitary sewer conveyance systems, a certificate of availability must be i'sued to pates the concurrency test. For surface water conveyance systems, the water quality and detention standards described in the currently adopted King County Surface Watcr Design Manual must be mct to pass thoThe transportation concurrency test. IA. For roads, the concurrency testreview compares level of service at intcrsections or corridors, as defined in the transportation element, both with and without thcconsidering the transportation demand generated by the proposed development at a time 6 years after the estimated occupancy of the development.. If the level of service is equal to or better than the level of service standard, the transportation concurrency testreview is passed. 3,B. If the concurrency test isCity does not passedissue a transportation concurrency certificate for water, sewer, surface water, or roads, then proposed development, the applicant may retest forrequest additional review for transportation concurrency after doing one or both of the following: a 1. Modifying the application to reduce the need for the non existent concurrencytransportation facilities that do not meet the level of service standard. Reduction of need can be through the reduction of the size of the development, reduction of trips generated by original proposed development, or phasing of the development to match future concurrencytransportation facility construction; or 1372.Arranging to fund the improvements for the additional capacity required for the concurrencytransportation facilities, as approved by the Public Works Director. § 9.50.050. Transportation Concurrency for Phased Development and Rezones. A. An applicant may request transportation concurrency for a phased development if the 34 Public Works Director or designee determines that the two criteria described in TMC Section 9.-50.-050.-B are met. An applicant may request transportation concurrency for rezoning if the Public Works Director or designee determines that the criteria described in TMC Section 9.50.050.0 are met. The application for transportation concurrency must be accompanied by a schedule for construction of the buildings, parking and other improvements and by a written request for the development to be considered in phases. B. B-The Public Works Director or designee may approve transportation concurrency for phased development if both of the following criteria are met: 1. 4No associated development permit is required before building permit applications can be submitted; and 2. 2—The application is for an integrated development site plan with multiple buildings that are interdependent for vehicular and pedestrian access and parkingoparking. C. C. AThe Public Works Director or designee may approve transportation concurrency for rezoning a parcel or parcels if all the criteria are met: 1. All the parcels are contiguous and have common ownership. 2. The rezone will not require a comprehensive plan amendment or, if a comprehensive plan amendment is needed, the comprehensive plan amendment is completed. 3. The rezone is part of a larger project that is sufficiently defined so that the City may reasonably determine the project's transportation impacts. D. A transportation concurrency application for phased development or rezone shall follow the same timing and procedure as set forth in this chapter, except that: 1. 1—Only one transportation concurrency certificate shall be issued for all buildings proposed for phased development or rezone; 2. 2The transportation concurrency certificate for an approved phased development or rezone shall be valid for five years from the date of its issuance; provided that a building permit is issued for a building within one year of the date of issuance of the transportation concurrency certificate or within two years if an extension is timely requested and the request is granted. E. The Public Works Director or designee may approve anone extension of up to one year of the transportation concurrency certificate for the phased development or rezone, consistent with the terms of this chapter. F. R—In no case shall the transportation concurrency certificate be valid for more than six years from the date of issuance of the certificate0certificate. The applicant must apply for a new transportation concurrency testreview for any building approved for phased development that has not been issued a building permit within six years from the date of issuance of the concurrency certificate. 35 § 9.50.060. ExemptionsDevelopment Accounted for in the Model. Applications for single-family dwelling unit building permits, multi -family building permits for projects containing four or fewer units, short plats, any non-residential project that is categorically exempt from SEPA pursuant to TMC Section 21.04004.080, .100, or .110, or any other project that will generate less than 30 net new PO MO peak hourdaily person trips a shall be considered as exempt from meeting concurrency requirements and shall bo automatipaily granted a transportation concurrency certificate. The applicant is required to submit upon application because such developments are accounted fora concurrency certificate, along with in the associated fee, but is not subject to receiving a passing grade in order to obtain other development approvals.City's system -wide transportation concurrency modeling. § 9.50.070. Vesting. effective date of this chapter if they have, prior to the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter: 1. Submitted a building permit application that the City has deemed complete; or 2. Entered into formal negotiation ^wit�e—City for a rle„elopment agreemei rr�i4 accordance with RCW 36.70B.170 through 36.70B.210; or 3. Have a signed agreement with the City that is still in effect. § 9.50.080. Improvements to ConcurrencyTransportation Facilities. A. The City shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, adequate transportation facilities through construction of needed capitalrransportation improvements in implementing strategies which do the following: 1, Achievcachieve level of service standards for anticipated future development and redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development and building permitsd, and improvements to the facilities shall be consistent with the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Repa Teplacce-obsolete-or deteraccating faccilities. B. Improvements to the facilities shall be consistent with the Transportation Element, I Itilitias Element and Capital Improvement Program of the Comprehensive Plan § 9.50.090. Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program. The City shall include in the capital appropriations of its budget for expenditure during the appropriate fiscal year financial commitments for all capital improvement projects required for adopted level of service standards, except the City may omit from its budget any capital improvements for which a binding agreement has been executed with another party to provide the same project in the same fiscal yearbiennium. § 9.50.1 00. Intergovernmental Coordination. A. The City may enter into agreements with other local governments, applicable non City managed utilities, King County, the state of Washington, and other facility providers to 36 coordinate the imposition of level of service standards and other mitigations for concurrency. B. The City may apply standards and mitigations to development in the City that impacts mitigations that are imposed by other jurisdictions on development in their jurisdiction that impart the City § 9.50.1 1 0. 110. Administrative Rules and Procedures. The Public Works Department shall be authorized to establish administrative rules and procedures for administering the transportation concurrency testcertificate system. The administrative rules and procedures shall include but not be limited to application forms, necessary submittal information, processing times, and issuance of the transportation concurrency certificatccertificates. § 9.50.1-20 . Appeals. A. Procedures. The applicant may Any party seeking to appeal the results of thca transportation concurrency test based on three grounds: 1. A technical error; 2. The applicantdecision may file an appeal of a Type 2 decision as provided alternative data pro traffic mitigation plan that �e ias rejected by the Cit y; or 3. Delay in reviewChapters 18.104 and approval caused solely by the City that allowed capacity to be given to another applicant. The applicant must file a notice of appeal with the Public Works Department within 15 days of the notification of be submitted on the foorm authorized by the Public Works Depa ��Caach� v��cc err- �-n--R�crrvrrc `"'NN app al -must be submitted with the appeal fee set forth in18.116 TMC Section 18.90.010. B. Hearing Schedule and Notification. When the appeal has been filed within the time prescribed, in proper form, with the appropriate data and payment of the required fee, the Public Works Department shall transmit the appeal to the hearing examiner for scheduling. Notice of the public hearing shall be given to the applicant at least 1 5 days prior to the hearing date. C. Record. The Public Works Department shall transmit to the Hearing Examiner all papers, calculations, plans and other materials constituting the record of the concurrency test, at least 7 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. The Examiner shall consider the app I upon the record transmitted, supplemented by any additional competent evidence, which the parties in interest may desire to submit. D. Burden of Proof. The burden of proof shall be on the appellant to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the Public Woncs Director was in error 37 § 9.50.130. SEPA Exemption. A determination of transportation concurrency shall be an administrative action of the City of Tukwila that is categorically exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act. 38 Attachment B DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2105; TO UPDATE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES IN ALIGNMENT WITH RECENT CHANGES TO THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, Washington state updated the 1990 Growth Management Act (GMA) with new requirements for cities and counties required to plan under the GMA; and WHEREAS, via Ordinance No. 2753 approved by the City Council on December 16, 2024, the City of Tukwila ("City") adopted a significant update to the City's Comprehensive Plan, including an updated Transportation Element; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a new multimodal level of service standard as part of the Transportation Element; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2105 in 2024, establishing the City' s current consolidated permit fee schedule; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2124 in 2025, updating certain sections under the Land Use Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, a new Transportation Impact Fee Schedule has been established to implement the Transportation Element and in accordance with Ordinance ; and WHEREAS, Ordinance requires adoption of the Transportation Impact Fee Schedule to be set via a City Council approved resolution; and WHEREAS, the consolidated permit fee schedule is the logical vehicle for including the Transportation Impact Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, the City's consolidated permit fee schedule needs to be updated to reflect these changes. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 2026 Legislation: Update TIF Schedule Version: 05/20/2026 Staff: C. Knighton Page 1 of 2 39 Section 1. Resolution No. 2105 is hereby amended to revise Section 4, " Public Works Fee Schedule," of the Consolidated Permit Fee Schedule deleting the "Transportation Concurrency Test Fee Schedule" table in its entirety. Section 2. The Transportation Impact Fee Schedule (Exhibit A) is added to the Public Works Fees section and will be charged according to the schedule and take effect on October 14, 2026. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2026. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Andy Youn-Barnett, CMC, City Clerk Armen Papyan, Council President APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney 2026 Legislation: Update TIF Schedule Version: 05/20/2026 Staff: C. Knighton Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Resolution Number: Page 2 of 2 40 Exhibit A Transportation Impact Fee Schedule Land Use Group ITE Code Ci Unit y of Tukwila Rates by Daily Vehicle Trip Rate' Multimoda Daily Person Vehicle -to- Person Trip Ratio TIF Program Trip Daily Person Trip Rate Passby, Diverted Link % Net Ne Person T per Unit* Residential 210 Single Family Detached Housing dwelling 9.09 1.45 13.18 0% 13.18 $ 963.99 $ 3,191.52 $ 6,414.98 $ 1,302.13 215 Single Family Attached Housing dwelling 6.57 1.45 9.53 0% 9.53 $ 696.75 $ 2,306.74 $ 4,636.57 $ 941.14 - Accessory Dwelling Unit (50% SF Detached) dwelling - - - - - $ 482.00 $ 1,595.76 $ 3,207.49 $ 651.07 220 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) dwelling 6.21 1.45 9.00 0% 9.00 $ 658.57 $ 2,180.35 $ 4,382.51 $ 889.57 221 Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) dwelling 4.46 1.45 6.47 0% 6.47 $ 472.98 $ 1,565.92 $ 3,147.50 $ 638.89 240 Mobile Home Park dwelling 7.87 1.45 11.41 0% 11.41 $ 834.61 $ 2,763.18 $ 5,554.00 $ 1,127.37 251 Senior Adult Housing (Single Family) dwelling 4.16 1.45 6.03 0% 6.03 $ 441.17 $ 1,460.59 $ 2,935.79 $ 595.91 252 Senior Adult Housing (Multifamily) dwelling 3.25 1.45 4.71 0% 4.71 $ 344.66 $ 1,141.08 $ 2,293.58 $ 465.56 253 Congregate Care Facility* dwelling 2.43 1.45 3.52 0% 3.52 $ 257.70 $ 853.18 $ 1,714.90 $ 348.09 254 Assisted Living* bed 4.14 1.45 6.00 0% 6.00 $ 439.05 $ 1,453.56 $ 2,921.67 $ 593.05 Lodging 310 Hotel* room 5.84 1.45 8.47 0% 8.47 $ 619.33 $ 2,050.44 $ 4,121.40 $ 836.57 320 Motel room 3.35 1.45 4.86 0% 4.86 $ 355.27 $ 1,176.19 $ 2,364.16 $ 479.88 Auto Services 944 Gasoline/Service Station VFP 172.01 1.25 215.01 60% 86.01 $ 6,290.23 $ 20,825.22 $ 41,858.83 $ 8,496.62 945 Gas Station w/Convenience Market VFP 211.05 1.25 263.81 58% 110.80 $ 8,103.78 $ 26,829.37 $ 53,927.22 $ 10,946.30 Recreational 411 Public Park* acre 0.78 1.25 0.98 19% 0.79 $ 57.58 $ 190.64 $ 383.19 $ 77.78 432 Golf Driving Range* employee 55.57 1.25 69.46 0% 69.46 $ 5,080.34 $ 16,819.62 $ 33,807.56 $ 6,862.35 491 Racquet/Tennis Club* court 27.71 1.25 34.64 0% 34.64 $ 2,533.32 $ 8,387.11 $ 16,858.15 $ 3,421.91 495 Recreational Community Center* 1,000sf 28.82 1.25 36.03 19% 29.09 $ 2,127.60 $ 7,043.89 $ 14,158.26 $ 2,873.88 Institutional 520 Elementary School student 2.27 1.26 2.86 0% 2.86 $ 209.19 $ 692.57 $ 1,392.07 $ 282.57 522 Middle/JR High School student 2.09 1.26 2.63 0% 2.63 $ 192.60 $ 637.65 $ 1,281.68 $ 260.16 525 High School student 1.94 1.26 2.44 0% 2.44 $ 178.78 $ 591.89 $ 1,189.70 $ 241.49 540 Junior/Community College student 1.15 1.26 1.45 0% 1.45 $ 105.98 $ 350.86 $ 705.23 $ 143.15 560 Church* 1,000sf 6.78 1.26 8.54 0% 8.54 $ 624.80 $ 2,068.55 $ 4,157.80 $ 843.96 565 Day Care Center 1,000sf 39.3 1.26 49.52 44% 27.73 $ 2,028.12 $ 6,714.55 $ 13,496.29 $ 2,739.51 590 Library 1,000sf 72.05 1.26 90.78 20% 72.63 $ 5,311.75 $ 17,585.73 $ 35,347.44 $ 7,174.92 Medical 610 Hospital 1,000sf 10.7 1.26 13.48 0% 13.48 $ 986.05 $ 3,264.53 $ 6,561.72 $ 1,331.92 620 Nursing Home* bed 3.06 1.26 3.86 0% 3.86 $ 281.99 $ 933.59 $ 1,876.53 $ 380.90 Restaurant 931 Fine Dining Restaurant* 1,000sf 79.03 1.25 98.79 44% 55.32 $ 4,046.06 $ 13,395.40 $ 26,924.86 $ 5,465.28 932 High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant 1,000sf 103.75 1.25 129.69 43% 73.92 $ 5,406.49 $ 17,899.41 $ 35,977.95 $ 7,302.90 933 Fast Food w/o Drive-Thru* 1,000sf 413.41 1.25 516.76 53% 242.88 $ 17,763.63 $ 58,810.47 $ 118,209.46 $ 23,994.48 934 Fast Food w/ Drive-Thru 1,000sf 448.12 1.25 560.15 53% 266.07 $ 19,459.91 $ 64,426.39 $ 129,497.49 $ 26,285.76 937 Coffee/Donut Shop w/ Drive-Thru 1,000sf 600.5 1.25 750.63 76% 177.01 $ 12,946.50 $ 42,862.29 $ 86,153.51 $ 17,487.68 938 Coffee/Donut Shop w/ Drive-Thru (no indoor seatidrive-thru lane 179 1.25 223.75 91% 20.88 $ 1,527.36 $ 5,056.68 $ 10,163.97 $ 2,063.11 970 Wine Tasting Room 1,000sf 111.85 1.25 139.81 0% 139.81 $ 10,225.60 $ 33,854.14 $ 68,047.06 $ 13,812.38 971 Brewery Taproom* 1,000sf 61.69 1.25 77.11 0% 77.11 $ 5,639.85 $ 18,671.99 $ 37,530.83 $ 7,618.11 Retail 813 Free -Standing Discount Superstore 1,000sf 50.52 1.25 63.15 29% 44.84 $ 3,279.25 $ 10,856.69 $ 21,822.03 $ 4,429.49 815 Free -Standing Discount Store 1,000sf 53.87 1.25 67.34 20% 53.87 $ 3,939.94 $ 13,044.06 $ 26,218.65 $ 5,321.93 816 Hardware/Paint Store* 1,000sf 8.07 1.25 10.09 26% 7.46 $ 545.96 $ 1,807.51 $ 3,633.11 $ 737.46 820 Shopping Center (>150k) 1,000sf 36.39 1.25 45.49 29% 32.30 $ 2,362.07 $ 7,820.17 $ 15,718.60 $ 3,190.60 821 Shopping Plaza (40-150k) -Supermarket* 1,000sf 101.43 1.25 126.79 29% 90.02 $ 6,583.81 $ 21,797.20 $ 43,812.51 $ 8,893.18 821 Shopping Plaza (40-150k) - Not Supermarket 1,000sf 65.38 1.25 81.73 35% 53.12 $ 3,885.18 $ 12,862.76 $ 25,854.23 $ 5,247.96 822 Strip Retail Plaza (<40k)* 1,000sf 54.45 1.25 68.06 40% 40.84 $ 2,986.77 $ 9,888.38 $ 19,875.71 $ 4,034.43 840 Automobile Sales (New) 1,000sf 27.84 1.25 34.80 0% 34.80 $ 2,545.20 $ 8,426.46 $ 16,937.24 $ 3,437.97 841 Automobile Sales (Used) 1,000sf 27.06 1.25 33.83 0% 33.83 $ 2,473.89 $ 8,190.37 $ 16,462.71 $ 3,341.65 848 Tire Store 1,000sf 28.54 1.25 35.68 28% 25.69 $ 1,878.62 $ 6,219.60 $ 12,501.44 $ 2,537.58 850 Supermarket 1,000sf 92.29 1.25 115.36 24% 87.68 $ 6,412.41 $ 21,229.71 $ 42,671.87 $ 8,661.65 851 Convenience Store* 1,000sf 651.94 1.25 814.93 51% 399.31 $ 29,204.95 $ 96,689.55 $ 194,346.68 $ 39,449.02 857 Discount Club 1,000sf 40.34 1.25 50.43 34% 33.28 $ 2,434.07 $ 8,058.53 $ 16,197.70 $ 3,287.85 862 Home Improvement Superstore 1,000sf 30.65 1.25 38.31 42% 22.22 $ 1,625.22 $ 5,380.64 $ 10,815.13 $ 2,195.29 863 Electronics Superstore* 1,000sf 41.05 1.25 51.31 40% 30.79 $ 2,251.73 $ 7,454.87 $ 14,984.35 $ 3,041.56 880 Pharmacy/Drug Store w/o Drive-Thru 1,000sf 90.08 1.25 112.60 53% 52.92 $ 3,870.61 $ 12,814.51 $ 25,757.26 $ 5 228 28 881 Pharmacy/Drug Store w/ Drive-Thru 1,000sf 107.2 1.25 134.00 49% 68.34 $ 4,998.25 $ 16,547.82 $ 33,261.24 $ 6,751.46 890 Furniture/Flooring Store 1,000sf 6.32 1.25 7.90 53% 3.71 $ 271.56 $ 899.06 $ 1,807.13 $ 366.82 Services 912 Drive -In Bank 1,000sf 98.85 1.25 123.56 30% 86.49 $ 6,325.98 $ 20,943.56 $ 42,096.71 $ 8,544.90 941 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop* service bay 40 1.25 50.00 28% 36.00 $ 2,632.97 $ 8,717.03 $ 17,521.28 $ 3,556.52 942 Automobile Care Center* 1,000sf 33.89 1.25 42.36 20% 33.89 $ 2,478.65 $ 8,206.11 $ 16,494.34 $ 3,348.07 945 Convenience Store/Gas Station VFP 211.05 1.25 263.81 56% 116.08 $ 8,489.67 $ 28,106.96 $ 56,495.19 $ 11,467.55 Office 710 General Office Building 1,000sf 7.83 1.22 9.55 0% 9.55 $ 698.66 $ 2,313.06 $ 4,649.27 $ 943.72 715 Single Tenant Office Building* 1,000sf 12.3 1.22 15.01 0% 15.01 $ 1,097.51 $ 3,633.55 $ 7,303.45 $ 1,482.48 720 Medical/Dental Office Building 1,000sf 34.03 1.22 41.52 0% 41.52 $ 3,036.44 $ 10,052.81 $ 20,206.22 $ 4,101.51 732 Post Office* employee 27.17 1.22 33.15 20% 26.52 $ 1,939.47 $ 6,421.04 $ 12,906.33 $ 2,619.76 Industrial/Port 110 General Light Industrial 1,000sf 3.6 1.08 3.89 0% 3.89 $ 284.36 $ 941.44 $ 1,892.30 $ 384.10 &Terminal 130 Industrial Park 1,000sf 2.68 1.08 2.89 0% 2.89 $ 211.69 $ 700.85 $ 1,408.71 $ 285.94 140 Manufacturing 1,000sf 4.27 1.08 4.61 0% 4.61 $ 337.28 $ 1,116.65 $ 2,244.48 $ 455.59 150 Warehouse 1,000sf 1.38 1.08 1.49 0% 1.49 $ 109.00 $ 360.88 $ 725.38 $ 147.24 151 Mini -Warehouse 1,000sf 1.29 1.08 1.39 0% 1.39 $ 101.90 $ 337.35 $ 678.07 $ 137.64 ' ITE Trip Gene ation Handbook, 12th Edition: Daily Weekday Vehicle Trip Generation R tes 1The ratio of vehicle trips to person trips as extracted from the PSRC Household Travel Survey 'Excludes pass -by trips: see "Trip Generation Handbook: An ITE Proposed Recommended Practice" (2014). For Restaurant: sit-down uses, percentage of new trips based on peer studies with higher pass -by trip levels to be more consistent with trends expected in Tukwila. ° PM Peak Person Trip Rate multiplied by the Passby, Diverted Link percentage 5 dwelling = dwelling unit, sq ft = square feet, pump = vehicle servicing position/gas pump, room = available hoteUmotel room, window = number of drive through teller windows/ATM drive through positions * ITE Land Use Category has five or fewer studies for daily vehicle trip rates. 41 Impact Fee Zones (2026) 1 Seattle -Tacoma international !Airport Sci slay S Boeing Adtti4., 5-433rdSt 3 rn twirl 41 O a �� a N vs r 1 j ; 5144li, - . G �F 3 2 P ry \ Southcehter,Blwl 0 GradY"N�y, Tulavila Pkwy S 160th St S 164th St +`d 55rander Blvd w 181 � + o ▪ r Q 1 rt 1 r ca 1 A W � P:.r� 0 .,fie. t/ S 200th st�i An do ver S t80th St 0 0S 1 !Niles Impact Fee Zones 4 Source: Transportation Element December 2024 42 Attachment C Transportation Impact Fee Rate Study Date: May 2026 To: City of Tukwila From: Fehr & Peers Introduction Since 1990, Washington State law (RCW 82.02.050) has allowed jurisdictions to utilize transportation impact fees (TIF) to fund capacity projects needed to support growth in lieu of relying solely on the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The City of Tukwila adopted a TIF schedule in 2005. The most recent update to the TIF schedule in 2020 included a revised project list with updated project costs. The current schedule includes 17 projects with an estimated capital value of $57 million. These projects consist of intersection improvements and roadway widenings to add vehicular capacity. The current TIF rate, averaged across the four zones, comes to $4,176.24 per PM peak hour trip, which has not increased since the 2020 update. Building on the recently adopted Transportation Element (TE) and Background Report, the City is updating its TIF program to reflect the new multi -modal level of service standard. The adopted TE and Background Report include a wide variety of projects enhancing multimodal capacity, including intersection improvements, complete streets upgrades, bike facilities, and sidewalks. This TIF program introduces significant changes to Tukwila's existing TIF program, with the most notable being the shift from a primary focus on adding vehicle capacity to a program that adds capacity for all modes. As such, there is also a shift from vehicle trips to person trips as a measure of transportation impacts and the basis for assessing fees. This shift better links trip generation from new development to the need for expanding the multimodal transportation network. State law requires jurisdictions to allow independent fee calculations, enabling any development to submit justification for a reduced fee based on trip data specific to its proposal. The remaining sections of the report describe the proposed impact fee changes and methodology, the analyses performed, and the resulting recommendations. 43 Structure and Methodology The multimodal transportation impact fee structure for the City of Tukwila was designed to determine the fair share of multimodal transportation improvement costs that may be charged to new development. Growth in residents, workers, and visitors related to new development will increase travel demand on public facilities. Therefore, the City of Tukwila must expand its multimodal transportation network as the City grows. The basis for calculating a proportionate share of building new transportation facilities stems from understanding how many "person trips" a development generates and how many of those trips use new capacity added through the TIF program. Different calculations are made for people driving, walking, and bicycling. The following key points summarize the City's impact fee structure (see Figure 1). A multimodal TIF project list was developed from the TE and Background Report. These projects were evaluated for impact fee eligibility; impact fees can only fund new capacity. Non -capacity investments, primarily maintenance and safety improvement projects, are not eligible for inclusion in the TIF project list. A calculation was made to subtract the cost of fixing any "existing deficiencies" from the project cost estimates on the TIF project list. Figure 1. Impact Fee Structure List of Projects 1 Capacity Projects Safety/ Maintenance/Other Portion Due to Portion Due to New Growth Existing Deficiency " lel Growth Outside City Cost Allocated to Cost Paid by Impact Fees City or Others Eligible Casts Growth in Trips Cost Per Trip Allocated to Impact Fees Fehr & Peers 44 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 12 Of the remaining eligible projects, the portion of the project's cost that supports non -City growth was subtracted from eligible costs to determine the total eligible impact fee program cost. The total eligible cost per project was divided by the total projected growth in daily person trips. This calculation was carried out for each of the City's four TIF zones. After determining the allowable cost per daily person trip, a land use - based fee schedule was developed for the City to ease administration of the program. Person trip rates for multiple land use categories were estimated using vehicle trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and the ratio of person trips to vehicle trips based on the PSRC Household Travel Survey. TIF Zones This program assesses fees based on a cost per daily person trip, rather than PM peak vehicle trip. The conversion from vehicle trips to person trips is described in the following sections. Given the shape of Tukwila and the topographical conditions, travel can be isolated to separate areas of the City. Accordingly, the City has a long history of using a zone system for TIFs, such that the costs are allocated across zones. The TIF zones are mapped in Figure 2. Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 1 3 45 Figure 2. Map of Impact Fee Zones (2026) dt 411. Seyttle-Tacoma Interttattoltal d Airport son ..___. Lit}, Eourdary rks Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 513'trd St rY 6^zlny Ac Rd_ 51finth St 164th Si w 4' Strander Blvd 71t trr <<.ir 41 'a s Both $t eft X T S 200th A Impact Fee Zones 4 0 0.5 1 Miles The TIF program includes three project types based on which mode is gaining new capacity as part of the project: vehicle/intersection projects, bicycle projects, and pedestrian projects. Additionally, two other citywide programs are included, signal interconnect, and Fehr & Peers 46 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 14 data and engineering studies to support capital projects. The methodology for allocating costs to each zone for the project types is described in Table 1. Table 1. Allocation of Project Costs to Zones by Project Type Project Type or Citywide Program Cost Allocation Methodology Vehicle/Intersection Apply proportional share of project fee to each zone based on model trip data. Bicycle Pedestrian Signal Interconnect Data and Engineering Studies to Support Capital Projects Apply proportional share of project fee to each zone based on percentage of 1.5-mile bike shed that falls within the zone. Fees associated with pedestrian projects apply only to the zone where the project is located. If the project falls on the border, the fee is proportionally distributed between adjacent zones based on length. Cost of signal interconnect is distributed among zones based on the proportion of trips in each zone as calculated by the 2044 model. The costs associated with data and engineering studies in support of capital projects are distributed among zones based on the proportion of trips in each zone as calculated by the 2044 model. Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 1 5 47 Project List Washington State law (RCW 82.02.050) specifies that transportation impact fees are to be spent on transportation "system improvements."1 Transportation system improvements include "public streets, roads, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities that were designed with multimodal commuting as an intended use"2 and can include physical or operational changes to existing transportation facilities, as well as new transportation connections that are built in one location to benefit projected needs at another location. Projects on the TIF list must add new multimodal capacity (new streets, additional lanes, sidewalks, bike lanes, low -stress bike routes, signalization, roundabouts, etc.). Transportation projects that cannot be included in the TIF program include facilities that only benefit a single development or property owner (typically local streets that are necessary to connect to the larger network), improvements that correct an existing deficiency (e.g., projects to address an existing traffic congestion issue that exceeds the LOS standard), or other projects that do not expand the capacity of the transportation system (e.g., a project to address a safety concern or a maintenance project). The 2026 TIF project list was based on the City's Transportation Element and Background Report (adopted December 2024) and identified multimodal transportation projects needed to accommodate growth, meet the adopted multimodal policies, and ensure that adequate facilities are provided for all travel modes. The list includes 21 capital projects as well as citywide signal interconnect, data and engineering studies to support capital projects, and carry-over costs for completed TIF projects that have not yet been collected. Fehr & Peers worked with the City to develop the TIF project list using only capacity - improving projects eligible for TIF funding. Other non -capacity improving projects that were identified in the Transportation Element and Background Report must use funding sources other than the TIF. The resulting project list is mapped in Figure 3 and described in Table 2. The TIF project list has a total grant -adjusted capital cost of approximately $30 million3 anticipated between now and 2044. i https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=82.02.050 2 https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=82.02.090 3 Note: The cost of Signal Interconnect was derived from the previous impact fee program. Fehr & Peers 48 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 16 Figure 3. Map of TIF Projects A r i 1 , City Boundary Parks Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 4 5 Boeing :cRd e4 5133rd St Seattle -Tacoma International +Airport 1 .r� 5124th 5t ���� s rzyth st a "a 4es P ``s 3 2 5 144th St 5 147th St Soulhced't. r e Blur} N • 5 160th st 4� SW 2th st 51641h Sr °Q 112 " Minkrer Blvd 1 7 e°ik 5 200th St\i. Impact Fee Zones Project Type Bicycle Project 2 o Complete Streets Project 3 Pedestrian Project 4 Vehide Project (corridor) Vehicle Project (intersection) 5 180th 5t1 0 OS 1 CIO Miles Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 1 7 49 Table 2. TIF Project List and Descriptions ID4 Project Name Description A C F H J L M P Q S T Buffered Lane on 42nd Ave S Section 3 S Norfolk St Bike Facilities 42nd Ave S Bridge Replacement SR 518 EB Off -ramp / Klickitat Drive Intersection Improvements S 115th Street / E Marginal Way Intersection Improvements Andover Park E/Minkler Blvd Intersection Andover Park E/Industry Dr Intersection S 152nd St Safe Routes to School 46th Ave S Safe Routes to School Macadam Rd S Section 1 Sidewalk S 146th St Sidewalk Remove parking on one side and widen sidewalk to create a 12ft shared use path 8ft parking lane, 2- 11ft lanes and 8ft sidewalk. Add bike facilities on S Norfolk St. If this project moves forward, need to update bike network. Design and construct a replacement structure for the existing 42nd Ave S Bridge near the Tukwila Community Center. Design and construct a new traffic signal, lighting, and pedestrian facilities including crosswalks and pedestrian push buttons. Design and construct a new traffic signal, lighting, and pedestrian facilities including crosswalks and pedestrian push buttons. Coordinate the new traffic signal with the Interurban Ave / E Marginal Way signal. Design and construct left turn lanes on Andover Park East and reconstruct traffic signal. Improve safety and provide needed capacity. Design and construct traffic signal with Andover Park East left turn lanes and crosswalks. Install curb, gutter, and sidewalks on both sides of S 152nd St, including widening pavement width. Install curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the west side of 46th Avenue South. Install a curb bulb -out at the southeastern corner of 46th Ave S and S 144th St and a raised crosswalk on S 144th St with pedestrian -activated flashing beacons. Construct sidewalk on west side of 42nd Ave S from S 124th St to entrance of 42nd Ave S Bridge, construct sidewalk on both sides of 42nd Ave S from entrance of 42nd Ave S Bridge to Interurban Ave S. Construct sidewalk on both sides of Macadam Rd S from Interurban Ave S to S 130th St. Construct sidewalk on south side of entire segment, and extend the sidewalk on the north side to the project extents 4 IDs align with IDs established in the TE and Background Report 50 V Strander Blvd Sidewalk X Minkler Blvd Section 2 Sidewalk Y - North Tukwila International Blvd Section Section 2 Sidewalk Y - South Tukwila International Blvd Section Section 2 Sidewalk E Marginal Way S Section 2 Sidewalk AB S 142nd St Sidewalk AC S 141st St Section 1 Sidewalk AD Ryan Way Road Diet AE AJ SI S 144th Street Complete Street Southcenter Boulevard Road Diet Signal Interconnect ENGINEERING Data and Engineering Studies to STUDIES Support Capital Projects Construct sidewalk on south side of Strander Blvd from Christensen Rd to W Valley Hwy. Construct sidewalk on both sides of Strander Blvd from W Valley Hwy to east boundary of Tukwila city limits Construct sidewalk on both sides of road segment Construct sidewalk on east side of Tukwila International Blvd from S 112th St to the HW 99 Exit Ramp. Construct sidewalk on both sides of Tukwila International Blvd from the HW 99 Exit Ramp to 12400 Block. Construct sidewalk on both sides of road segment Construct sidewalk on both sides of road segment Construct sidewalk on both sides of road segment Resurface and re -channel S Ryan Way to improve failing pavement and improve safety. Add pedestrian and bicycle facilities where appropriate. Signalize intersection with 47th Avenue S to accommodate future growth and improve safety. Restripe and remove parking on one side to accommodate 2-10ft lanes, 1-2ft buffer, and 1-10ft two- way cycle track. Construct sidewalk facilities on the south side of the street. Re -channel Southcenter Boulevard to increase multimodal options and improve safety. Add pedestrian and bicycle facilities where appropriate. Citywide Signal Interconnect Costs associated with data and engineering studies, as well as regular TIF updates (full TIF update for every comp plan cycle, concurrency report every 2 years) Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 12 51 Person Trip Growth Determining the existing travel demand, as well as growth in travel demand caused by new development is a key requirement for a TIF program. Trip generation rates by land use category are the most common approach to quantify travel demand. In short, trip generation represents the desire for mobility by residents, visitors, and workers to access homes, jobs, shopping, recreation, and other activities. For the purposes of the analysis, trip generation represents the movement by one person on a typical weekday from one activity to another regardless of travel mode (driving, riding transit, biking, or walking). Fehr & Peers developed a method to calculate growth in daily person trips using data from Tukwila's TE and Background Report, the City's 2018 travel demand model,5 trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), and household survey data from the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). Person trips are defined as travel between an origin and a destination. Each person trip has two trip ends, one each at the origin and destination. The specific steps to calculate person trips from the Comprehensive Plan land use growth assumptions are listed below: 1. Translate the land use data in the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan into a format used for impact fees: a. Total household dwelling units were converted to single-family and multi -family units based on Tukwila housing statistics: i. Currently, 58% of all housing units in Tukwila are multi-family6 ii. In 2044, 77% of all housing units in Tukwila will be multi -family b. Next, employees were converted by different land use sectors into square footage using standard estimates of square feet per employee, listed below: i. 400 square feet per retail employee ii. 300 square feet per office/government service employee iii. 500 square feet per manufacturing/warehouse employee iv. 300 square feet per all other employees Table 3 shows the resulting growth estimates for each land use by zone. For more detail on the calculations computed for each zone, see Appendix A. Growth Estimations in Dwelling Units (DU) and Square Footage (1000 sq ft) by Zone Calculations. 5 At the time the project was started, the calibrated base year for the Tukwila version of the regional PSRC Model was 2018. Base years are only recalibrated every few years, so they typically lag behind the current year. 6 Table DP04 Selected Housing Characteristics, Tukwila City, 2023 ACS 5-Year Estimates 52 Table 3. Growth Estimations in Dwelling Units (DU) and Square Footage (1000 sq ft) by Zone Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Citywide Total Households Office Education Industrial Retail 3,516 2,720 1,337 -1,054 1,656 DU = dwelling unit; sq ft = square feet Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 265 593 8 -668 68 2,678 563 -53 -483 34 270 372 400 -795 699 6,729 4,249 1,692 -3,000 2,457 2. Estimating the trip ends associated with the land use using a ratio of the person trip rate to vehicle trip rates from the PSRC Household Travel Survey and vehicle trip rates from the ITE. This approach of using ITE vehicle trip generation rates and then converting them to person trip rates is the most defensible approach as of the time this rate study was prepared. While ITE and other sources are beginning to calculate person trip generation rates directly, the person trip generation dataset is not nearly as robust as the vehicle trip generation dataset. PSRC has strong travel survey data on how many person trips and vehicle trips are generated for different trip purposes and this information is combined with the ITE vehicle trip generation rate to create a more detailed depiction of person trip generation rates than any other source available. a. Daily vehicle trip rates for each land use category were taken from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition. b. Apply the vehicle -to -person trip generation rate factors from the PSRC household travel survey to the associated ITE land use category. Table 4 outlines the ratios used in developing person trip rates for the impact fee, organized by generalized ITE land use category. Each of the unique vehicle -to -person trip ratios in the table below can be multiplied by the associated ITE vehicle trip rate to reach a person trip rate, unless the applicant proposes another vehicle -to -person trip ratio from a credible data source. Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 12 53 Table 4. Vehicle Trip to Person Trip Ratios Land Use Category Land Uses' Vehicle -to - Person Trip Ratio Port and Terminal Industrial Residential Lodging Recreational Institutional Medical Office Retail Services 000-099 100-199 200-299 300-399 400-499 500-599 600-699 700-799 800-899 900-999 1.08 1.08 1.45 1.45 1.25 1.26 1.26 1.22 1.25 1.25 1. Vehicle -to -person trip generation rate factors from the PSRC household travel survey Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 3. Total daily person trips within the city were ultimately calculated by multiplying the daily person trip rate by the total growth in dwelling units and non-residential square footage, depending on the land use. This calculation also includes a pass -by adjustment to account for these types of trips.? Table 5 and Table 6 outline the existing person trips by zone and the growth in person trips by zone resulting from the calculations described above. For more detail on the calculations computed for each zone, see Appendix B. Existing Person Trips by Zone Calculations and Appendix C. Growth in Person Trips by Zone Calculations. 7 A pass -by trip is any person trip that may go to a land use, but is part of a larger overall "trip tour." The defining feature of the pass -by trip is that it is an interim stop that did not initiate the overall need to travel. Typical examples are people stopping on their way to work to get coffee on the route they were already traveling on or someone buying gas on their trip between home and a store along the route they were already traveling on. Fehr & Peers 54 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 1 3 Table 5. Existing Person Trips by Zone Generalized Land Use Category Citywide Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Total Single Family Multi -Family Office/Government Education Industrial Retail Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 359 12,266 26,838 943 40,406 244 8,364 18,300 643 27,552 22,439 9,791 13,678 1,186 47,094 4,516 3,317 8,726 2,552 19,111 18,071 4,691 5,851 10,947 39,560 58,493 24,640 14,356 7,664 105,153 Table 6. Growth in Person Trips by Zone Generalized Land Use Category Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Citywide Total Single Family Multi -Family Office/Government Education Industrial Retail Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 463175 1,765 178 2,581 2,581 22,511 1,628 16,453 1,659 42,250 23,388 5,099 4,840 3,202 36,529 34,121 196 -1,363 10,198 43,161 -4,099 -2,596 -1,879 -3,090 -11,664 45,204 1,860 920 19,077 67,062 These total daily person trip estimates will be used in the calculation of transportation impact fees rate in each zone. Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 14 55 Impact Fee Eligible Costs To meet GMA requirements, the TIF methodology must separate the share of project costs that address existing deficiencies from the share of project costs that add multimodal capacity and serve new growth. The resulting growth -related improvement costs are then further separated to identify the share of growth related to land development in Tukwila versus growth from outside of the city. New development in Tukwila cannot be charged a fee to pay for the capacity needs generated by development outside of the City. Figure 4 shows the general calculation steps for determining the total impact fee eligible cost. For Tukwila's program, existing deficiencies are calculated using the concept of "existing system value." This concept calculates the value of the existing transportation system, accounting for depreciation of pavement, and then determines the value per existing person trip generated. In other words, the existing system value is based on the cost of replacing the current transportation system divided by the number of current person trips generated in Tukwila. This provides a general approximation of the per-capita/per- employee value of the current system. This existing system value is used to ensure that the future TIF rate does not exceed the value of the current per trip value of the existing system. The concept that an impact fee cannot exceed the value of the current level of investment in a system is common for parks, schools, and fire impact fees and is thus translated to transportation for Tukwila's program. Should the TIF exceed the existing system value per person trip, the TIF would be capped at this value. Therefore, with this cap in place, there are no existing deficiencies that need to be accounted for in the TIF program. Figure 4. Impact Fee Eligible Cost Equation Project Cost Percentage of Growth within City Percent of Growth in Tukwila Not Existing Deficiency Impact Fee Eligible Cost Neighboring jurisdictions' growth may also use the new multimodal capacity that Tukwila has committed to building. Tukwila does not have the authority to charge growth in neighboring jurisdictions for their share of building new transportation infrastructure without an interlocal or interagency agreement. To account for this statutory limitation, adjustments were made for trips that pass -through Tukwila or only have one end of the trip starting or ending in Tukwila. The current tools to calculate the share of growth in trips that can be attributed to Tukwila are limited to vehicle and bicycle trips. The percentage of pedestrian trips attributed to city growth are defined based on engineering judgement. For Fehr & Peers 56 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 1 5 this program, we assumed an internal -trip generation proportion of 100% for pedestrian projects, as the Tukwila zones are constrained and the vast majority of new trips using upgraded pedestrian facilities in Tukwila will be generated by new growth within the City (as opposed to pedestrians from SeaTac or Renton walking through Tukwila to reach their destination, for example). For motorized projects, Fehr & Peers analyzed traffic forecasts generated by Tukwila's travel model in areas of the city where the vehicular TIF projects are located to calculate the portion of trips related to growth in each of the four zones, as well as outside of the city. Considering the share of trips, each vehicle has a different share of growth that can be related to the City of Tukwila. A similar process was conducted to calculate the share of trips that are attributed to each TIF zone for bicycle TIF projects. Fehr & Peers created 1.5 mile buffers around each bicycle project segment. A 1.5 mile buffer was used to capture a general bike shed that may utilize the bicycle facility given topography and connectivity. The percentage of the buffer that falls within each zone is used to determine the share of growth attributable to each zone and is applied to the project cost. The percentage of the buffer that falls outside of Tukwila city limits is removed from the portion of the project cost eligible for the TIF program. After applying these percentages to the TIF project list, the total eligible impact fee program cost is $23,611,465 which breaks out to the following total costs per zone: 1. Zone 1: $8,892,688 2. Zone 2: $1,540,612 3. Zone 3: $10,092,686 4. Zone 4: $3,085,478 The overall project list cost (grant adjusted) totals $30,364,801, so the cost that is attributable to internal Tukwila growth is 78% of the total grant adjusted cost of the TIF project list. Accordingly, the TIF program is not the sole funding source for project development. In areas with more pedestrian projects, where 100% of the fee is attributed to the zone, there may be a higher reliance on TIF to fund project development. The City has invested in roadway projects over the years to accommodate vehicular capacity and a key piece of meeting person -trip demand will be expanding the pedestrian network. Developments that may be constructed are already benefiting from excess roadway capacity; therefore, the City is planning to invest a greater share of funding than it has in the past to build out the pedestrian and bicycle networks to ensure people using any mode can connect to their destinations. Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 16 57 Existing Deficiencies Tukwila has a surface transportation network that provides rights -of -way (streets, sidewalks, and off-street bicycle and pedestrian paths) for nearly all types of travel within the city (excluding I-5, I-405, SR-518, SR-599). The City is responsible for maintaining, improving, and expanding this infrastructure to support transportation services for people traveling by all modes, including walking, biking, transit, and private vehicles. This impact fee program is based on the existing system value, which ensures that new development does not pay a higher rate than existing residents and developments have paid into the City's current transportation system. This methodology sets the maximum allowable impact fee rate at the existing level of investment per existing person trips. In Tukwila's most recent Pavement Conditions Report (received June 2025), the City determined the average replacement cost for a typical roadway of approximately $305 per square yard, not including the value of the land. The City maintains about 160 centerline miles of roadway, and the existing level of investment is $474.3 million for the paved roadway network. This includes depreciation of the existing system based on the Pavement Condition Index across the city. This existing system value is then divided by the existing person trips to determine the existing level of investment per person trip. Dividing the existing system value by the existing person trips results in the maximum legal amount that new development could be required to contribute to maintain the existing level of investment, or maximum allowable cost, of $1,701 per daily person trip. Maximum Allowable Cost per Daily Person Trip = Existing Person Trips Existing System Value Table 7 summarizes the impact fee eligible costs, and maximum allowable cost per person trip. Table 7: Existing System Value per Person Trip Existing System Value Existing Daily Person Trip Ends Maximum Allowable Cost per Person Trip (Existing System Value / Existing Daily Person Trip Ends) $474,296,340 278,876 $1,701 Fehr & Peers 58 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 1 7 It is important to note that the $1,716 cost per daily person trip represents the maximum TIF amount that can be charged based on legal and technical requirements related to existing deficiencies. This can be used as check to ensure that new development is not paying more than the existing deficiency limit into the City's transportation system. The total eligible impact fee program cost in each zone (the cost after removing growth not attributable to the city) was divided by the growth in person trips attributed to that zone and compared against the existing system value. Table 8 outlines the cost per daily person trip by zone. Table 8. Calculation of Impact Fee Cost per Daily Person Trip by Zone Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Total Eligible Impact Fee Program Cost Growth in Daily Person Trip Ends (2018-2044) Cost per Daily Person Trip Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 $8,892,68 121,588 $73.14 $1,540,612 $10,092,686 6,362 20,737 $242.14 $486.70 $3,085,478 31,232 $98.79 As evident in the table above, Zone 3 has the highest maximum fee per daily trip, and Zone 1 has the lowest maximum fee per daily trip. This is reflective of the heavy investment in projects within Zone 1 over recent years. Zone 3 is anticipated to have extensive growth over the plan horizon, and more projects are necessary to accommodate that growth in transportation needs. Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 18 59 Developing Fee Estimates When the City is estimating an impact fee for a development or land use change, the following procedure can be used to estimate daily person trips and associated impact fees. Note that while this methodology is intended to be applied consistently, it may not always address all project -specific situations and in some cases, it may be reasonable for a fee payer to provide an independent fee calculation per TMC 9.48. 1. Review the most recent version of the ITE Trip Generation Manual for the estimated number of daily vehicle trips, selecting the most appropriate land use for the proposed development based on sound engineering judgement and land uses available from the ITE Manual. 2. Reduce the estimate using the pass -by rate in the most recent version of the ITE manual. a. The use of pass -by rates from the ITE Trip Generation Manual applies to select land uses from the following land use categories: i. Institutional ii. Retail iii. Services. 3. Apply internal capture rates for mixed -use developments. a. Internal capture adjustments apply to mixed -use developments. These calculations identify the number of internal trips (those within a mixed -use development) and external trips (those starting or ending outside of the mixed -use development). 5. The project team is responsible for performing the internal capture rate calculations. a. ITE resources on internal capture, including documented steps and a calculation spreadsheet can be found in Chapter 6 of the ITE Manual and are summarized here: https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/trip-and- parking-generation/other-resources/ 4. Use the vehicle -to -person trip ratio to convert the estimated daily vehicle trips to daily person trips. See 5. Table 9 for the vehicle -to -person trip ratios by land use categories. Fehr & Peers 60 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 1 9 Table 9. Vehicle -to -Person Trip Ratios Land Use Category Land Uses Vehicle -to - Person Trip Ratio Port and Terminal Industrial Residential Lodging Recreational Institutional Medical Office Retail Services 000-099 100-199 200-299 300-399 400-499 500-599 600-699 700-799 800-899 900-999 1.08 1.08 1.45 1.45 1.25 1.26 1.26 1.22 1.25 1.25 6. Multiply the resulting estimate for new daily person trips by the adopted rate for the zone in which the project is located (see Table 10). Table 10. Final Fee per Daily Person Trip by Zone Fee per Daily Person Trip Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 $73.14 $242.14 $486.70 $98.79 6. If calculating the fee for a land use with an exemption or reduction, apply the exemption/reduction percentage from the resulting fee. The current exemptions/reductions are outlined below: a. Early Learning Facility: 80% exemption 7. Accessory Dwelling Units: 50% exemption a. Low Income Housing: variable reduction Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 110 61 Periodic TIF Review and Updates To ensure that the impact fee program remains relevant to funding projects that are important to the community and support growth needs, Fehr & Peers recommends updating the impact fee program every six to ten years to reflect the changing project list, funding, and growth assumptions. This program will be updated in full aligning with the regular Comprehensive Plan updates. Furthermore, the City shall consider updating the per -person impact fee rates annually to account for inflation. The following steps can be taken to update the impact fee program: 8. Review and update impact fee eligible project list a. Remove projects that are completed or no longer priorities for the city b. Add new projects that were not previously included and are eligible for impact fees i. For any added projects, update the percentage of Tukwila growth (eligible percentage) 9. Update the cost per person trip rate by dividing total eligible project cost in each zone by the daily person trips associated with the zone, using the existing growth estimates by zone, or an updated 20-year person trip growth estimate, if available. 10. Compare the resulting fee to the maximum allowable rate (existing system value). Example Fee Schedule As part of the TIF update, the City of Tukwila developed a sample rate table as an example of how the calculations would fall under the ITE rates at the time of the rate study development (October 2025). The table should be used as reference and should not be the basis for impact fee calculations, as the ITE trip generation rates may change. outlines each piece of information that is included in the sample rate table (Table 12). Table 12 shows an example of the proposed impact fee schedule based on the maximum fee in each Zone and the final TIF rate (capped at the existing system value) using the ITE 12th Edition trip rates. Fehr & Peers 62 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 111 Table 11. Tukwila Fee Schedule Column Descriptions Column Name Description ITE Land Use Category ITE Code Land use types pulled from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The three -digit numerical code associated with the ITE Land Use Category. ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 12th Edition: Daily Vehicle Trip Generation Rates for the Adjacent Street Vehicle Daily Trip Rate Traffic (Weekday) associated with the ITE Land Use Category. Vehicle -to -Person Trip Ratio The ratio of vehicle trips to person trips as extracted from the 2021 PSRC Household Travel Survey. The daily person trip rate associated with the ITE Land Daily Person Trip Rate Use Category. This is calculated by multiplying the Daily Vehicle Trip Rate by the Vehicle -to -Person Trip Ratio. Pass -by, Diverted Link % Net New Person Trips per Unit Maximum Defensible Rate Exclusion of pass -by trips: see "Trip Generation Handbook: An ITE Proposed Recommended Practice" (2014). The number of new person trips per unit, excluding the pass -by trips. This is calculated by multiplying the Daily Person Trip Rate by the Pass -by, Diverted Link percentage. This is the maximum rate that the City can charge as part of their impact fee program. Unit of Measure Unit of measure for calculating the total fee. Final TIF Rate The TIF rate capped at the existing system value. Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 112 63 Table 12. Tukwila Multimodal TIF Program Rate Table Example by Zone City of Tukwila Multimodal TIF Program Rates by Daily Person Tnp Land Use Group ITE Code Description - Daily Vehicle Trip Rate' Vehicle -to- Person Trip Ratio u Daily Person Trip Rate Passby, Diverted Link % 3 Net New Person Trips per Unit of Measure ° Zone 1 Impact Fee Per Unit Zone 2 Impact Fee Per Unit Zone 3 Impact Fee Per Unit Zone 4 Impact Fee Per Unit Unit Residential 210 Single Family Detached Housing 9.09 1.45 13.18 0% 13.18 $ 964.56 $ 3,194.84 $ 6,416.57 $ 1,298.51 per dwelling unit 215 Single Family Attached Housing 6.57 1.45 9.53 0% 9.53 $ 697.16 $ 2,309.14 $ 4,637.72 $ 938.53 per dwelling unit 220 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 6.21 1.45 9.00 0% 9.00 $ 658.96 $ 2,182.62 $ 4,383.60 $ 887.10 per dwelling unit 221 Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) 4.46 1.45 6.47 0% 6.47 $ 473.26 $ 1,567.55 $ 3,148.29 $ 637.11 per dwelling unit 240 Mobile Home Park 7.87 1.45 11.41 0% 11.41 $ 835.10 $ 2,766.05 $ 5,555.38 $ 1,124.24 per dwelling unit 251 Senior Adult Housing (Single Family) 4.16 1.45 6.03 0% 6.03 $ 441.43 $ 1,462.11 $ 2,936.52 $ 594.26 per dwelling unit 252 Senior Adult Housing (Multifamily) 3.25 1.45 4.71 0% 4.71 $ 344.86 $ 1,142.27 $ 2,294.15 $ 464.27 per dwelling unit 253 Congregate Care Facility 2.43 1.45 3.52 0% 3.52 $ 257.85 $ 854.07 $ 1,715.32 $ 347.13 per dwelling unit 254 Assisted Living 4.14 1.45 6.00 0% 6.00 $ 439.30 $ 1,455.08 $ 2,922.40 $ 591.40 per bed Lodging 310 Hotel 5.84 1.45 8.47 0% 8.47 $ 619.70 $ 2,052.57 $ 4,122.42 $ 834.25 per room 320 Motel 3.35 1.45 4.86 0% 4.86 $ 355.48 $ 1,177.42 $ 2,364.74 $ 478.55 per room Auto Services 944 Gasoline/Service Station 172.01 1.25 215.01 60% 86.01 $ 6,293.92 $ 20,846.89 $ 41,869.22 $ 8,473.02 per VFP 945 Gas Station w/Convenience Market 211.05 1.25 263.81 58% 110.80 $ 8,108.53 $ 26,857.30 $ 53,940.61 $ 10,915.90 per VFP Recreational 495 Recreational Community Center 28.82 1.25 36.03 19% 29.09 $ 2,128.84 $ 7,051.22 $ 14,161.78 $ 2,865.90 per 1,000 square feet Institutional 520 Elementary School 2.27 1.26 2.86 0% 2.86 $ 209.31 $ 693.29 $ 1,392.41 $ 281.78 students 522 Middle/JR High School 2.09 1.26 2.63 0% 2.63 $ 192.71 $ 638.31 $ 1,282.00 $ 259.44 students 525 High School 1.94 1.26 2.44 0% 2.44 $ 178.88 $ 592.50 $ 1,189.99 $ 240.82 students 565 Day Care Center 39.3 1.26 49.52 44% 27.73 $ 2,029.31 $ 6,721.54 $ 13,499.64 $ 2,731.91 per 1,000 square feet 560 Church 6.78 1.26 8.54 0% 8.54 $ 625.17 $ 2,070.70 $ 4,158.83 $ 841.62 per 1,000 square feet 620 Nursing Home 3.06 1.26 3.86 0% 3.86 $ 282.16 $ 934.57 $ 1,877.00 $ 379.85 per bed Restaurant 931 Fine Dining Restaurant 79.03 1.25 98.79 44% 55.32 $ 4,048.44 $ 13,409.35 $ 26,931.54 $ 5,450.10 _ per 1,000 square feet 932 High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant 103.75 1.25 129.69 43% 73.92 $ 5,409.66 $ 17,918.05 $ 35,986.88 $ 7,282.62 per 1,000 square feet 933 Fast Food w/o Drive-Thru 413.41 1.25 516.76 53% 242.88 $ 17,774.04 $ 58,871.69 $ 118,238.81 $ 23,927.85 per 1,000 square feet 934 Fast Food w/ Drive-Thru 448.12 1.25 560.15 53% 266.07 $ 19,471.31 $ 64,493.45 $ 129,529.64 $ 26,212.76 per 1,000 square feet 937 Coffee/Donut Shop w/ Drive-Thru 600.5 1.25 750.63 76% 177.01 $ 12,954.09 $ 42,906.91 $ 86,174.90 $ 17,439.11 per 1,000 square feet 938 Coffee/Donut Shop w/ Drive-Thru (no indoor seating) 179 1.25 223.75 91% 20.88 $ 1,528.26 $ 5,061.95 $ 10,166.49 $ 2,057.38 per drive-thru lane 970 Wine Tasting Room 111.85 1.25 139.81 0% 139.81 $ 10,231.59 $ 33,889.38 $ 68,063.96 $ 13,774.02 per 1,000 square feet 971 Brewery Taproom 61.69 1.25 77.11 0% 77.11 $ 5,643.16 $ 18,691.43 $ 37,540.15 $ 7,596.95 per 1,000 square feet Retail/Service 813 Free -Standing Discount Superstore 50.52 1.25 63.15 29% 44.84 $ 3,281.17 $ 10,867.99 $ 21,827.45 $ 4,417.19 _ per 1,000 square feet 815 Free -Standing Discount Store 53.87 1.25 67.34 20% 53.87 $ 3,942.25 $ 13,057.64 $ 26,225.16 $ 5,307.15 per 1,000 square feet 816 Hardware/Paint Store 8.07 1.25 10.09 26% 7.46 $ 546.28 $ 1,809.39 $ 3,634.01 $ 735.41 per 1,000 square feet 820 Shopping Center (>150k) 36.39 1.25 45.49 29% 32.30 $ 2,363.46 $ 7,828.31 $ 15,722.50 $ 3,181.74 per 1,000 square feet 850 Supermarket 92.29 1.25 115.36 24% 87.68 $ 6,416.17 $ 21,251.81 $ 42,682.46 $ 8,637.60 per 1,000 square feet 857 Discount Club 40.34 1.25 50.43 34% 33.28 $ 2,435.49 $ 8,066.92 $ 16,201.72 $ 3,278.72 per 1,000 square feet 862 Home Improvement Superstore 30.65 1.25 38.31 42% 22.22 $ 1,626.17 $ 5,386.25 $ 10,817.82 $ 2,189.19 per 1,000 square feet 863 Electronics Superstore 41.05 1.25 51.31 40% 30.79 $ 2,253.05 $ 7,462.63 $ 14,988.07 $ 3,033.12 per 1,000 square feet 880 Pharmacy/Drug Store w/o Drive-Thru 90.08 1.25 112.60 53% 52.92 $ 3,872.88 $ 12,827.85 $ 25,763.65 $ 5,213.76 per 1,000 square feet 881 Pharmacy/Drug Store w/ Drive-Thru 107.2 1.25 134.00 49% 68.34 $ 5,001.18 $ 16,565.05 $ 33,269.49 $ 6,732.71 per 1,000 square feet 890 Fumiture/Flooring Store 6.32 1.25 7.90 53% 3.71 $ 271.72 $ 900.00 $ 1,807.57 $ 365.80 per 1,000 square feet 912 Drive -In Bank 98.85 1.25 123.56 30% 86.49 $ 6,329.68 $ 20,965.36 $ 42,107.16 $ 8,521.17 per 1,000 square feet _ Office 710 General Office Building 7.83 1.22 9.55 0% 9.55 $ 699.07 $ 2,315.47 $ 4,650.43 $ 941.10 per 1,000 square feet 715 Single Tenant Office Building 12.3 1.22 15.01 0% 15.01 $ 1,098.15 $ 3,637.33 $ 7,305.27 $ 1,478.36 per 1,000 square feet 720 Medical/Dental Office Building 34.03 1.22 41.52 0% 41.52 $ 3,038.22 $ 10,063.28 $ 20,211.24 $ 4,090.12 per 1,000 square feet Industrial/Port 110 General Light Industrial 3.6 1.08 3.89 0% 3.89 $ 284.53 $ 942.42 $ 1,892.77 $ 383.04 per 1,000 square feet &Terminal 130 Industrial Park 2.68 1.08 2.89 0% 2.89 $ 211.81 $ 701.58 $ 1,409.06 $ 285.15 per 1,000 square feet 140 Manufacturing 4.27 1.08 4.61 0% 4.61 $ 337.48 $ 1,117.81 $ 2,245.03 $ 454.32 per 1,000 square feet 150 Warehouse 1.38 1.08 1.49 0% 1.49 $ 109.07 $ 361.26 $ 725.56 $ 146.83 per 1,000 square feet 151 Mini -Warehouse 1.29 1.08 1.39 0% 1.39 $ 101.96 $ 337.70 $ 678.24 $ 137.26 per 1,000 square feet 1 ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 12th Edition: Daily Weekday Vehicle Trip Generation Rates 64The ratio of vehicle trips to person trips as extracted from the PSRC Household Travel Survey 3 Excludes pass -by trips: see "Trip Generation Handbook: An ITE Proposed Recommended Practice" (2014). For Restaurant: sit-down uses, higher percentage of new trips based on peer studies to be more consistent with expected trends PM Peak Person Trip Rate multiplied by the Passby, Diverted Link percentage dwelling = dwelling unit, sq ft = square feet pump = vehicle servicing position/gas pump, room = available hotel/motel room, window = number of drive through teller windows/ATM drive through positions Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 12 65 Appendix A. Growth Estimations in Dwelling Units (DU) and Square Footage (1000 sq ft) by Zone Calculations Table 13. Zone 1 Growth Estimations in Dwelling Units (DU) and Square Footage (sq ft) 2018 Tukwila Totals (DU and Employees) Totals in DU, Conversion Employees, to Sq Ft and 1,000 sq ft 2044 Tukwila Totals (DU and Employees) Conversio n to Sq Ft Totals in DU, Employees and 1,000 sq ft Households 65 65 Households 3,581 3,581 Office 8,700 300 2,610 Office 17,768 300 5,330 Education 177 177 Education 1,514 -- 1514 Industrial 9,296 500 4,648 Industrial 7,187 500 3,594 Retail 5,358 400 2,143 Retail 9,499 400 3,799 DU = dwelling unit; sq ft = square feet Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 2044 Total minus 2018 Total Table 14. Zone 2 Growth Estimations in Dwelling Units (DU) and Square Footage (sq ft) 2018 Tukwila Totals Conversion (DU and Employees) to Sq Ft Totals in DU, Employees, and 1,000 sq ft 2044 Tukwila Totals Conversion (DU and Employees) to Sq Ft Totals in DU, Employees and 1,000 sq ft Households 2,224 2,224 Households 2,489 2,489 Office 3,796 300 1,139 Office 5,773 300 1,732 Education 130 -- 130 Education 138 -- 138 Industrial 2,413 500 1,207 Industrial 1,078 500 539 Retail 2,257 400 903 Retail 2,427 400 971 DU = dwelling unit; sq ft = square feet Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 2044 Total minus 2018 Total =Total New Growth In DU, Employees and 1,000 sq ft 3,516 2,720 1337 -1,054 1,656 =Total New Growth In DU, Employees and 1,000 sq ft 265 593 8 -668 68 66 Table 15. Zone 3 Growth Estimations in Dwelling Units (DU) and Square Footage (sq ft) 2018 Tukwila Totals Conversion (DU and Employees) to Sq Ft Totals in DU, Employees, and 1,000 sq ft 2044 Tukwila Totals Conversion (DU and Employees) to Sq Ft Totals in DU, Employees and 1,000 sq ft Households 4,866 4,866 Households 7,544 7,544 Office 5,303 300 1,591 Office 7,180 300 2,154 Education 342 342 Education 289 289 Industrial 3,010 500 1,505 Industrial 2,044 500 1,022 Retail 1,315 400 526 Retail 1,399 400 560 DU = dwelling unit; sq ft = square feet Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 2044 Total minus 2018 Total Table 16. Zone 4 Growth Estimations in Dwelling Units (DU) and Square Footage (sq ft) 2018 Tukwila Totals Conversion (DU and Employees) to Sq Ft Totals in DU, Employees, and 1,000 sq ft 2044 Tukwila Totals Conversion (DU and Employees) to Sq Ft Totals in DU, Employees and 1,000 sq ft Households 171 171 Households 441 441 Office 460 300 138 Office 1,701 300 510 Education 100 100 Education 500 500 Industrial 5,631 500 2,816 Industrial 4,042 500 2,021 Retail 702 400 281 Retail 2,450 400 980 DU = dwelling unit; sq ft = square feet Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 2044 Total minus 2018 Total =Total New Growth In DU, Employees and 1,000 sq ft 2,678 563 -53 -483 34 =Total New Growth In DU, Employees and 1,000 sq ft 270 372 400 -795 699 Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 12 67 Appendix B. Existing Person Trips by Zone Calculations Table 17. Zone 1 Existing Person Trips Generalized Land Use Pass -by Category Adjustment Single Family Multi -Family Office/Government 0.9 Education 0.9 Industrial Retail Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 0.6 Person Trip Rate 2018 Land Use in DU, Employees, and 1,000 sq ft Existing Person Trips 13.18 27 359 X 6.47 X 38 = 244 9.55 2,610 22,439 28.35 177 4,516 3.89 4,648 18,071 45.49 2,143 58,493 Total Existing Person Trips 104,123 Table 18. Zone 2 Existing Person Trips Generalized Land Use Pass -by Category Adjustment Single Family Multi -Family Office/Government 0.9 Education Person Trip Rate 13.18 6.47 9.55 0.9 28.35 3.89 Industrial Retail 0.6 45.49 Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 2018 Land Use in DU, Employees, and 1,000 sq ft 931 1,293 1,139 130 1,207 903 Total Existing Person Trips Existing Person Trips 12,266 8,364 9,791 3,317 4,691 24,640 63,069 Fehr & Peers 68 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 1 3 Table 19. Zone 3 Existing Person Trips Generalized Land Use Pass -by Category Adjustment Single Family Multi -Family Office/Government 0.9 Education 0.9 Industrial Retail Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 0.6 Table 20. Zone 4 Existing Person Trips Generalized Land Use Pass -by Category Adjustment Single Family Multi -Family Office/Government 0.9 Education Person Trip Rate 13.18 6.47 9.55 28.35 3.89 45.49 Person Trip Rate 13.18 6.47 9.55 0.9 28.35 3.89 Retail 0.6 45.49 Industrial Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 2018 Land Use in DU, Employees, and 1,000 sq ft 2,036 2,830 1,591 342 1,505 526 Total Existing Person Trips 2018 Land Use in DU, Employees, and 1,000 sq ft 72 99 138 100 2,816 281 Total Existing Person Trips Existing Person Trips 26,838 18,300 13,678 8,726 5,851 14,356 87,749 Existing Person Trips 943 643 1,186 2,552 10,947 7,664 23,935 Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 14 69 Appendix C. Growth in Person Trips by Zone Calculations Table 21. Zone 1 Growth in Person Trips Generalized Land Use Pass -by Category Adjustment Single Family Multi -Family Office/Government 0.9 Education 0.9 Industrial Retail Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 0.6 Person Trip Rate Total Growth in DU, Employees, and 1,000 sq ft Growth in Person Trips 13.18 176 2,317 X 6.47 X 3,340 = 21,601 9.55 2,720 23,388 28.35 1,337 34,121 3.89 -1,054 -4,099 45.49 1,656 45,204 Total Growth in Person Trips 122,532 Table 22. Zone 2 Growth in Person Trips Generalized Land Use Pass -by Category Adjustment Single Family Multi -Family Office/Government 0.9 Education Person Trip Rate 13.18 6.47 9.55 0.9 28.35 3.89 Retail 0.6 45.49 Industrial Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 Total Growth in DU, Employees, and 1,000 sgft Growth in Person Trips 13 175 X 252 = 1,628 593 5,099 8 196 -668 -2,596 68 1,860 Total Growth in Person Trips 6,362 Fehr & Peers 70 Tukwila TIF Rate Study 15 Table 23. Zone 3 Growth in Person Trips Generalized Land Use Pass -by Category Adjustment Single Family Multi -Family Office/Government 0.9 Education 0.9 Industrial Retail Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 0.6 Person Trip Rate Table 24. Zone 4 Growth in Person Trips Generalized Land Use Pass -by Category Adjustment Single Family Multi -Family Office/Government 0.9 Education 13.18 6.47 9.55 28.35 3.89 45.49 Person Trip Rate 13.18 6.47 9.55 0.9 28.35 3.89 Retail 0.6 45.49 Industrial Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025 Total Growth in DU, Employees, and 1,000 sq ft 134 2,544 563 -53 -483 34 Total Growth in Person Trips Total Growth in DU, Employees, and 1,000 sgft 14 257 372 400 -795 699 Total Growth in Person Trips Growth in Person Trips 1,765 16,453 4,840 -1,363 -1,879 920 20,737 Growth in Person Trips 178 1,659 3,202 10,206 -3,090 19,077 31,232 Fehr & Peers Tukwila TIF Rate Study 16 71 Transportation Impact Fee & Concurrency Program Updates Transportation and Infrastructure Committee May 28, 2026 80ILA 6y O e 44' y J a VI Attachment D Jen Tetatzin, PE, PMP Public Works Director and Cyndy Knighton Senior Program Manager The City of opportunity, the community of choice. 72 Agenda • Concurrency Management • Transportation Impact Fee Program Update • Proposed Code Changes 73 Concurrency Management What is Concurrency? Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that public infrastructure and facilities keep pace with development and the adopted level of service (LOS) standards. To comply with the GMA, cities must: • Promote orderly growth and development • Implement the policies of the Comprehensive Plan • Ensure that adequate facilities are available • Ensure that financial commitments are in place • Ensure that impact fees imposed are not arbitrary or duplicative of other fees for the same impact 75 What if we don't meet Concurrency? • Loss of eligibility for transportation grant funding • Options available to comply • Prohibit or limit development • Reduce the scale/impacts of a proposed development • Require developer to construct needed improvements to meet adopted standards • Accelerate capital project delivery timeline • Change the City's standards to accept a lower level of service • Impact Fees ensure the City stays "open for business" NOTE State law requires Concurrency for many types of public infrastructure but failing Transportation Concurrency can have significant financial consequences, forcing cities to take drastic actions to remain eligible for funding. 76 How is Concurrency Measured? Multimodal Level of Service (MMLOS) establishes minimum standards for various modes of travel. Each mode has its own metric that must be monitored. -5 00 1-11�`�� LOS A-C Intersection Operation: Free flow Degree of Delay: Negligible is moderate delays rum Intersection Operation: Less stable flow Degree of Delay: Long delays LOS E Intersection Operation: Unstable flow Degree of Delay: Substantial delays LOS F Intersection Operation: Unpredictable flow/wait through multiple cycles Degree of Delay: Excessive delays Vehicle LOS Standards — Status Quo • Rates traffic congestion by measuring delays at intersections and certain corridors • Most have LOS E as the acceptable level of congestion • Signalized intersections: 55 to 80 seconds • Unsignalized intersections: 35 to 50 seconds • LOS in Southcenter is based on corridor averages • Strander Blvd and S 180th Street: LOS F with average delay not to exceed 120 seconds • Vehicle traffic must now be balanced with the needs of active modes of travel 77 How is Concurrency Measured? Bike / Pedestrian LOS Standards • The 2024 Comprehensive Plan identified a set of projects that need to be completed by 2044 to accommodate pedestrian and bicycle demand generated by anticipated growth. • Concurrency is measured by tracking the rate of active mode project implementation relative to the rate of growth in Tukwila. • The concurrency analysis is verified using a tracking tool that will be maintained by staff. ,are s,zswst Sdttle-Tacoma International Airport e ..I S;33rd St d6 3 2 0 S160th St S164th St C 144th St S14>thSt Impact Fee Zones =27th St • skier Blvd 1 S 180th St Project Type - Bicycle Prop& - Pressman Protect - Vehicle Protect lc edo0 • Vehicle Proles lintersvctionl 0 0.5 1 O � Miles 78 Transportation Impact Fee Program Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) Program • One-time charges paid by new development • Authorized in 1990 by Growth Management Act (GMA) as funding source for transportation improvements • Helps to fund improvements that add capacity to the transportation network • Can only be used for facilities that serve new growth, not to address condition deficiencies or preservation of existing facilities • Tukwila's policy established December 2005 in TMC 9.48 80 How do we currently assess TIF? • Council adopted current Fee Schedule in Jan 2020 • Fee based on expected traffic impacts and costs of identified projects • Fees determined for four geographic zones • Rates charged based on PM peak hour vehicle trips • TIF revenues are restricted and may only be used for approved vehicle capacity projects Current TIF Rates per PM Peak HourVehicle Trip Zone 1 m Zone 2 Zone 3 1 Zone 4 $4,438.73 $4, 863.14 $5,345.42 $2,057.66 o City of Tukwila Impact Fee Zones 0 -....w. 81 TIF Fund Summary • Historic average annual revenue is $813,000 • Zone 1 has generated the most revenues and has received the most investment • It takes years of accumulation of TIF fees to fund a capital project $1,800,000 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $- TIF Fund Revenues and Balance 2022 Revenue 2023 Revenue 2024 Revenue 2025 Revenue Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 —Fund Balance $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $o 82 Why are changes needed? • Cities must now account for multimodal capacity needs • Pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular facilities • New level of service (LOS) standards adopted in 2024 Comprehensive Plan • State legislative changes regarding proportionality and housing types • Refresh TIF project list • Reflect completed work and new needs • Adjust costs for inflation and increasing regulations IS THERE ADEQUATE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE TO MEET TRAVEL DEMAND OF NEW GROWTH? 4 * PEDESTRIAN A BICYCLE OOLt-DT] a 2 TRANSIT 5555 SISS ®®+ ore o SHARED -USE MOBILITY ogA_•\ ma Ga AUTO 83 What is changing? • Zone boundaries • List of TIF projects and TIF fee rates • Method for addressing existing system deficiencies • Method for identifying growth outside City and across zones • Method for assigning fees attributable to zones • Replacing vehicle -trips with person -trips to assess proportional impacts on the multi -modal system 84 Methodology Overview ) ( ) ( ions Zone Designation Grant Project Assumpt List Project Costs TMC Updates Fee Schedule 85 2026 — 2044 TIF Program Costs • Estimated Cost for all TIF Projects: $81M • Assumed Future Grant Funding: $51M • Remaining Funding Need: $30M • TIF Eligible Costs: $24M (Assigned to Zones) • Ineligible Costs: $7M (Attributable to external traffic impacts) • Covers 21 projects and: • City-wide traffic signal network connections • Traffic data collection and engineering • Carryover costs (fees for completed projects not yet collected) • Does not include $4M of projects deferred beyond the program planning horizon 86 TIF Rate Comparison: Existing and Proposed 3 z 1 Example: Hous'ng Comparison Single FamilyHome(Detached)Multi-Family Sin g per dwelling unit* (Mid -Rise) (1-bedroom unit) Existing TIF Proposed TIF Existing TIF Proposed TIF Zone 1 $4,394.34 $963.99 $2,012.22 $472.98 Zone 2 $4,814.51 $3,191.52 $2,204.62 $1,565.92 Zone 3 $5,291.97 $6,414.98 $2,423.26 $3,147.50 Zone 4 $2,037.08 $1,302.13 $932.81 $638.89 *Note: ADUs assessed at 50% of the single-family home rate. 87 TIF Rate Comparison: Existing and Proposed 3 \ 1\2 Example: Retail Comparison Restaurant (High -Turnover, Sit -Down) 10,000sf Retail (Small Grocery) 10,000sf Existing TIF Proposed TIF Existing TIF Proposed TIF Zone 1 $247,200.00 $54,067.90 $262,500.00 $64,124.10 Zone 2 $270,080.00 $178,991.10 $287,600.00 $212,297.10 Zone 3 $297,700.00 $359,779.50 $316,100.00 $426,718.70 Zone 4 $114,600.00 $73,029.00 $121,700.00 $86,616.50 88 TIF Rate Comparison: Existing and Proposed Example: Office Comparison Office Space (General) 10,000sf Existing Proposed TIF Zone 1 $48,337.77 $6,986.58 Zone 2 $52,959.59 $23,130.63 Zone 3 $58,211.62 $46,492.72 Zone 4 $22,407.92 $9,437.22 89 Regional Comparison Jurisdiction 2024/2025 TIF Rates Rates are per SF Dwelling or Equivalent Tukwila (Current) -$4,176 (Average) Based on current PM peak vehicle trip rates (average of all Tukwila TIF Zones). Tukwila (Proposed) $952 - $6,355 Ranging from Zone 1 to Zone 3 based on 13.2 person-trips/unit. SeaTac $4, 355 Recently updated in January 2025 (per PM peak hour trip). Kent recently updated their scaling rate to 55% Kent -$7,000+ of the maximum; effective rates are moderately high. Federal Way -$7,500 Based on 2024 regional TIF rate study comparisons. Auburn -$10,000 Based on 2024 regional TIF rate study comparisons. Renton $11,485 Very high compared to the region 90 Tukwila Municipal Code Changes Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Changes TMC 9.48 and 9.50 chapters are recommended to be repealed and replaced due to the substantial changes to both chapters. Common updates include: • Language updates to align with recent State law changes • Streamline the method for tracking progress • Align appeal process to match other appeals in TMC 18.116 • General housekeeping including removing unneeded language 92 TMC 9.48 Transportation Impact Fees Key changes to this chapter include: • Expand definition of transportation system to include bicycle and pedestrian facilities • Change impact unit of measure from PM vehicle trips to daily person trips • Clarify timing of impact fees and adjustment request process • Clarify process for adjustments and appeals • Clarify low-income housing reduction program • 10-year restriction for low-income covenant removed • RCW requires permanent covenant to qualify for TIF reduction • Process for adopting TIF fee schedule 93 TMC 9.50 Transportation Concurrency Key changes to this chapter include: • Remove water and sewer concurrency because they are addressed in Title 14 • Clarify process to match current practices • Clarify the rezone and phased development process • Clarify what is accounted for in the model 94 Next Steps Ordinance and Resolution Adoption • Repeal and replace TMC 9.48 and TMC 9.50 • Effective 5 days after adoption (standard) • Modify Consolidated Permit Fee Schedule • Recommended effective date 90 days after adoption Communication Plan • Developers and Property Owners • Permit Center staff • Hazelnut Follow On Actions • Concurrency monitoring and reporting • Capital project delivery • TIF Fund balance monitoring 95 The City of opportunity, the community of choice. 96 City of Tukwila Thomas McLeod, Mayor Marty Wine, City Administrator AGENDA BILL ITEM NO. 1.C. Agenda Item Sponsor Jen Tetatzin, Public Works Director, City Engineer Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager - Transportation Legislative History May 28, 2026 Transportation & Infrastructure Services Committee June 8, 2026 Committee of the Whole June 15, 2026 Regular Meeting Consent Recommended Motion ❑ Discussion Only ❑x Action Requested MOVE TO adopt a resolution adopting the Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (2027-2032) Resolution to Adopt Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (2027-2032) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY State law requires cities to approve a resolution adopting the annual update to the Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) after holding a public hearing. The proposed Six Year TIP for 2027-2032 include 22 new projects related to the 2024 Transportation Element, the 2025 Local Road Safety Plan, and the proposed Transportation Impact Fee updated schedule. Staff is requesting the Committee forward this item to the June 8, 2026 Committee of the Whole Meeting for a Public Hearing. DISCUSSION The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is updated annually as required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 35.77.010. The TIP is adopted by resolution after a public hearing at the local agency level and incorporated into regional and state TIPs. The TIP is primarily a financial planning document for projects competing for grants. Any project submitted for federal grant funding must be included in the local, regional, and state adopted TIPs. The TIP is a rolling plan showing various funding sources: grants, developer, and local funds. Projects "roll" as funds or stages occur (design report, final design, and construction). Tukwila's Six Year TIP, the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), the Transportation Element, and the Local Road Safety Plan list many of the same transportation -related projects. The TIP typically lists only those transportation -related projects planned within the next six years that are deemed regionally significant or that have grant funding awarded or expected. The attached Draft 2027 - 2032 TIP and was created by modifying the 2026 - 2031 TIP to add or remove projects and adjust project costs. With the current budget cycle beginning and the proposed Transportation Impact Fee schedule being discussed along the same timeline as the TIP update, the draft TIP also includes many more new projects than a typical year. The list of projects is presented in alphabetical order. Prioritization of projects is reflected in the current CIP but new projects added are not prioritized at this point. During the current budget cycle, Council priorities will be established along with budget projections, which will help identify the top priority projects to consider over the next 6 years and beyond. The TIP can be modified at any time throughout the year to rearrange project schedules or the Council can simply wait until next year's annual update to add, remove, or modify projects based on the final biennial budget adopted this year. 97 Two projects were removed and 22 new projects were added. The majority of new projects added are identified as top priority projects in the Transportation Element and the Local Road Safety Plan. All new projects added to the proposed Transportation Impact Fee schedule are included as they are the majority of the top priority projects in the Transportation Element. The Draft 2027-2032 TIP summary identifies all the new projects and where they originate from, as well as the current projects with the page number of the current CIP. Deleted Southcenter Boulevard Road Diet S 144t" Bridge Sidewalks King County is taking lead and project is included in their TIP Grant was returned, project can be added back in once funding is identified ATTACHMENTS • Draft 2027-2032 TIP Summary • Draft Resolution & 2027-2032 Draft Transportation Improvement Program • Current Adopted 2025-2030 TIP 98 https://tukwilawa.sharepoint.com/sites/clerksintranet/Council Agenda Items/05-28 TIS Committee/Resolution Adopting Annual TIP/1.Agenda Bill TIP 2027.docx DRAFT 2027 - 2032 TIP SUMMARY Source' or 2025-2030 CIP Sheet PROJECT TITLE Project Costs in Thousands of Dollars Funding Sources Unsecured 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 TOTAL Federal State/TIB City/Local Grant City* 39 42nd Avenue S Bridge Replacement 600 17,500 17,500 35,600 23,600 17,000 4,500 47 42nd Avenue S Bikeway 295 295 295 30 46th Avenue Safe Routes to School 325 2,070 2,395 1,895 500 1,725 420 New Airport Way Overlay 574 3,424 3,998 3,988 10 49 ADA Improvements 61 61 61 61 61 61 366 54 APE/Minkler Blvd Intersection 375 2,400 2,775 1,900 875 1,900 500 58 APE/Industry Drive Intersection 265 2,400 2,665 2,665 2,400 New Andover Park W (Strander to Tukwila Pkwy) 923 923 923 923 45 Annual Bridge Inspections and Repairs 232 237 242 242 247 247 1,447 1,447 35 Annual Overlay and Repair Program 2,520 2,520 2,720 2,720 3,155 3,155 16,790 16,720 43 Annual Traffic Signal Program 160 160 170 190 190 1 1,060 1,060 38 Boeing Access Road Overlay 3,526 3,526 3,990 TE, TIF Buffered Shared Path on 42nd Ave S Sect. 3 550 550 550 550 57 E Marginal Way S (BAR - S 112th St) 75 75 75 75 TE, LRSP E Marginal Way S (N City Limit to BAR) 6,917 917 6,917 6,917 New E Marginal Way S Overlay 685 5,058 3 5,743 TE, TIF E Marginal Way S Section 2 Sidewalks 03 803 803 LRSP Interurban Avenue S (140th St to S 144th St) 1,484 1,4 1,484 1,484 52 Interurban Avenue S Overlay 356 356 356 TE, LRSP Klickitat Dr (53rd Ave S to Southcenter Pkwy) 582 582 582 582 31 Macadam Road S Complete Streets 300 200 3,100 3,600 3,160 350 3,160 350 TE, TIF Macadam Road S Sect. 1 Sidewalk 992 992 992 TE, TIF Minkler Blvd Sect. 2 Sidewalk 1,4 1,430 1,430 1,430 44 Orillia Road S Overlay 1,204 1,204 1,204 TE, TIF S 115th SUE Marginal Way Intersection Impr 2,00 2,000 2,000 2,000 41 S 119th St Pedestrian Bridge Painting 200 200 200 55 S 124th St/50th PI S Reconfiguration 50 1,022 1,072 898 254 59 S 133rd St/SR 599 SB Intersection 2,700 3,250 1,620 1,630 1,620 1,630 TE, TIF S 141 st St Sect. 1 Sidewalk 510 510 510 510 TE, TIF S 142nd St Sidewalk 541 541 541 541 TE, TIF S 144th St Complete Streets 869 869 869 LRSP S 144th St Improvements (Military Rd to TIB) 580 580 580 28 S 152nd Street Ped & Bike Improvements 530 5,480 3,960 1,520 3,960 990 LRSP S 180th St (Sperry Dr to IU Trail) 806 806 806 806 TE, TIF S Norfolk St Bike Facilities 497 497 497 497 37 S Ryan Way 1, 13,0: 14,335 8,850 55,606 8,850 4,231 48 Southcenter Blvd Bike and Ped Xing U. -s 352 352 352 352 TE, TIF SR 518 EB Off Ramp/Klickitat Drive Im. ents 850 850 850 850 TE, TIF Strander Boulevard Sidewalk 467 467 467 467 TE, TIF TIB Sect. 2 Sidewalk (north) 377 377 377 377 TE, TIF TIB Sect. 2 Sidewalk (south) 1,673 1,673 1,673 1,673 - TDM Implementation 52 52 52 52 52 312 312 - Tukwila and South King County TDM d 260 130 650 832 208 - South King County Regional TDM 59 159 159 159 636 550 56 LRSP Tukwila Int'I Blvd (S 152nd St to S 144th St) 4,347 4,347 TOTAL 14,356 56,738 34,911 11,769 6,984 10,622 135,380 39,431 40,483 111,118 21,215 33,799 PROJECTS REVISED FROM 2025-2030 TIP New List out all new projects, ID as LRSP or TE Deleted/Completed: Modified Southcenter Boulevard Road Diet (King County lead) I don't think any were modified S 144th Bridge Sidewalks TE: Transportation Element, TIF: Transportation Impact Fee Schedule, LRSP: Local Road Safety Plan * Unsecured City funding includes all funds necessary outside of the current biennial budget cycle May 13, 2026 99 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A SIX -YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2027- 2032), AND DIRECTING THE SAME TO BE FILED WITH THE STATE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BOARD. WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of RCW Chapters 35.77 and 47.26, the City Council of the City of Tukwila has previously adopted a Transportation Improvement Program and thereafter periodically modified said Transportation Improvement Program by resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the work accomplished under said program, determined current and future City street and arterial needs and, based upon these findings, has prepared a Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program for the ensuing six calendar years (2027-2032); and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2026, a public hearing was held regarding the City's Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Program Adopted. A Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program for the calendar years 2027 to 2032, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby adopted. Section 2. Filing of Program. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a copy of this resolution, together with the exhibit attached hereto, with the Secretary of Transportation and the Transportation Improvement Board of the State of Washington 2026 Legislation: 2027-2032 TIP Version: 04/30/2026 Staff: C. Knighton Page 1 of 2 100 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2026. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Andy Youn-Barnett, CMC, City Clerk Armen Papyan, Council President APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Resolution Number: Office of the City Attorney Exhibit A: City of Tukwila Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program for 2027 to 2032 2026 Legislation: 2027-2032 TIP Version: 04/30/2026 Staff: C. Knighton Page 2of2 101 ANL Viashin atan state 'I Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D a Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 05 / 1037(004) TUK-62 42nd Ave S Bridge Replacement 42nd Ave S over the Duwamish River Interurban Ave S to Northern end of bridge Replace the existing 42nd Ave S steel truss bridge. The replacement will require preliminary engineer design, and construction phases. The new structure will meet current road and bridge design standards. The replacement structure configuration will be two through -lanes, possibly a turn pocket, and include sidewalks. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 11 0.100 DCE Yes Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Feder- S Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PE 2027 AO 0 500,000 500,000 S RW 2027 r 0 100,000 100,000 P CN 2028 BR 0,000 0 0 13,000,000 S CN 2028 BR 10, ' 16 MAW 17,000,000 3,900,000 31,499,306 T ,599, 06 17,000,000 4,500,000 45,099,306 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd Nif 4th 5th & 6th PE 500,000 0 0 0 0 RW 100,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 17,500,000 17,500,000 0 0 Totals 600,000 17,500,000 17,500,000 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 1 102 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D a Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 05 WA-15812 42nd Avenue S Bikeway 42nd Avenue S Southcenter Blvd to S 150th Street Develop a traffic -calmed bikeway along 42nd Ave S between S 150th St and Southcenter Blvd. On the west side of the street, add striped southbound bike lane between Southcenter Blvd and S 150th St. On the east side of the street, add striped bike lane between Southcenter Blvd and S 151st St. Remove on -street parking to widen the sidewalk on the east side of the street between S 151 st St and S 150th St, creating a shared path; add shared lane markings to the roadway Aill l‘› 06/08/26 0 /15/26 28 C G P S T W No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) S CN 2027 Federal Fund Code Fed un e Fund Code Tota 0 0 State Funds Local Funds Total Funds 0 295,000 295,000 0 295,000 295,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th CN 295,000 0 0 0 0 Totals 295,000 0 0 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 2 103 ANL Vieshin atan state 'I Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number L A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 19 WA-11113 46th Avenue Safe Routes to School 46th Avenue S S 150th Street to S 144th Street Designland construct curb, gEr ancorner r of 46th otke west 1 e4 oh 4tith with e s, including curb bulb -out at the SE corner of 46th Avenue S/S 144th Street with raised crosswalk across S 144th Street with RRFB. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 05 C G P S T W 0.370 Yes Funding Status S P P Phase PE RW CN Phase Start Year (YYYY) 2027 2027 2028 Federal Fund Code T Federa 0 0 Fund Code ARTS SRTS SRTS State Funds 170,000 65,000 1,660,000 1,895,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 250,000 0 0 0 0 RW 75,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 2,070,000 0 0 0 Totals 325,000 2,070,000 0 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Local Funds 80,000 10,000 410,000 500,000 Total Funds 250,000 75,000 2,070,000 2,395,000 Page 3 104 ANL Viashin atan state 'I Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 03 TUK-71 Airport Way Overlay Airport Way S Boeing Access Road to North Tukwila City Limit Plane, pavement repair, pave; channelization, and repair of curb and gutter, sidewalk, and guardrail, as necessary. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 05 0.380 CE No Funding Status S S Phase PE CN Phase Start Year (YYYY) 2027 2028 Federal Fund Code NHFP NHFP Totals Federal Fun and Core State Funds 0 0 0 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 4th 5th & 6th PE 574,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 3,424,000 0 0 0 Totals 574,000 3,424,000 0 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Local Funds 10,000 0 10,000 Total Funds 574,000 3,424,000 3,998,000 Page 4 105 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 00 WA-05405 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvements Various locations to Design and construct ADA compliant upgrades to City infrastructure in conjunction with a City developed plan. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 06 No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Fun and Core State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S ALL 2027 0 366,000 366,000 Totals 0 366,000 366,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 61,000 61,000 61, 61,000 122,000 Totals 61,000 61,000 61,000 61,000 122,000 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 5 106 ANL 1117washingtan state 417 Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 16 WA-07746 Andover Park E/Minkler Blvd Intersection Andover Park E Minkler Blvd to Construct left turn lanes on Andover Park East and reconstruct traffic signal _ 06/08/26 0 /15/26 03 C G O P S TW No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Fun and Core State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PE 2027 0 275,000 275,000 S RW 2027 0 100,000 100,000 P CN 2028 TIB 1,900,000 500,000 2,400,000 Totals 0 1,900,000 875,000 2,775,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 275,000 0 0 0 0 RW 100,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 2,400,000 0 0 0 Totals 375,000 2,400,000 0 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 6 107 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D a Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 04 WA-15107 Andover Park East/lndustry Dr Intersection Andover Park E Industry Drive to Design and construct traffic signal with Andover Park East left turn lanes and crosswalks. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 03 C G P S T W 0.100 Yes Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal F Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PE 2027 0 190,000 190,000 S RW 2027 0 75,000 75,000 P CN 2028 0 0 2,400,000 2,400,000 TotalsA 0 0 2,665,000 2,665,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 190,000 0 0 0 0 RW 75,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 2,400,000 0 0 0 Totals 265,000 2,400,000 0 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 7 108 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 05 WA-17047 Andover Park W (Strander to Tukwila Parkway) Andover Park W Strander Boulevard to Tukwila Parkway Construct driveway access improvements, provide bus lanes, install RRFB's, and improve signal timing 06/08/26 0 /15/26 04 0.390 No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Fun and Core State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2030 0 923,000 923,000 Totals 0 923,000 923,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 923,000 0 Totals 0 0 0 923,000 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 8 109 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 14 WA-03731 Annual Bridge Inspections and Repairs Various City Street to Perform load ratings and bi-annual inspections as well as construct necessary repairs and maintenance 06/08/26 0 /15/26 06 No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Fun and Core State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S ALL 2027 0 1,447,000 1,447, 000 Totals 0 1,447,000 1,447,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd4th 5th & 6th ALL 232,000 237,0001(142, 242,000 494,000 Totals232,000 237,00042,000 242,000 494,000 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 9 110 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 16 WA-03733 Annual Overlay and Repair Program Various City Streets to Repair, rehabilitate, and overlay City streets as needed in an annual program 06/08/26 0 /15/26 06 C G O P S TW No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Fun and Core State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S ALL 2027 0 16,790,000 16,790,000 Totals 0 16,790,000 16,790,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 2,520,000 2,520,000 720, 2,720,000 6,310,000 Totals 2,520,000 2,520,000 20,000 2,720,000 6,310,000 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 10 111 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number L A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 00 WA-15104 Annual Traffic Signal Program Varies to Design and construct traffic signal upgrades and repairs of signals that exceed routine maintenance work;loop replacement, head replacement, and controllers. Replace direct bury cable for existing lighting system. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 44 P No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal F Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S ALL 2027 0 1,060,000 1,060,000 Totals 0 1,060,000 1,060,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3 4th Sth & 6th ALL 160,000 160,00 70,00 190,000 380,000 Totals 160,000 160,000 70,000 190,000 380,000 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 11 112 ANL Viashin atan state 'I Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 03 / 1380(005) TUK-68 Boeing Access Road Overlay Boeing Access Road East Marginal Way S to Martin Luther King Jr Way S Grind and overlay roadway, replace concrete overlay of bridge deck over BNSF railway. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 05 0.560 CE No Funding Status S S Phase PE CN Phase Start Year (YYYY) 2027 2027 Federal Fund Code NHPP NHPP Totals Federal Fun and Core State Funds 0 0 0 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd • 4th 5th & 6th PE 100,000 0 1110 0 0 0 CN 3,426,000 0 0 0 0 Totals 3,526,000 0 0 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Local Funds 0 0 0 Total Funds 564,000 3,426,000 3,990,000 Page 12 113 ANL Vieshin atan State 'I Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number L A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing a Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 05 WA-17026 Buffered Shared Path on 42nd Ave S Section 3 42nd Ave S S 150th St to S 144th St Remove parking on one side and widen sidewalk to create shared -use path 06/08/26 0 /15/26 28 No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds Villillat State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2030 0 550,000 550,000 Totals ,111% 0 550,000 550,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd d 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 550,000 0 Totals 0 550,000 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 13 114 ANL Viashin atan state 'I Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 04 WA-15109 E Marginal Way S (BAR - S 112 St) E Marginal Way S Boeing Access Road to S 112th St . Goaad ito design and construct ikefull Planning proves ta determine project parameters. Could street improvements and traffic control. Could include additional lanes and bike lanes to support the new Sound Transit Link Light Rail infill station. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 03 C G O P S TW 0.270 Yes Funding Status P Phase PL Phase Start Year (YYYY) 2028 Federal Fund Code Totals Federa Fund Code State Funds 0 0 Expenditure Schedule N/ Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PL 0 75,000 0 0 0 Totals 0 75,000 0 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Local Funds 75,000 75,000 Total Funds 75,000 75,000 Page 14 115 ANL 1117washingtan state 417 Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number L A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 03 WA-17053 E Marginal Way S (N City Limit to S Boeing Access Rd) Boeing Access Road to Northern City Limit Widen and extend asphalt paving on E Marginal Way S north of S Boeing Access Road. Bike facilities may be desired here, pending BAR Infill station and area redevelopment, could connect to bike facilities on Airport Way if Seattle/Tukwila install, connecting via Norfolk to EMWS If this project moves forward, need to update bike network. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 04 C P S 1.900 CE No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Fed: St and Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2032 0 6,917,000 6,917,000 Totals 0 0 6,917,000 6,917,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 0 0 6,917,000 Totals 0 0 0 0 6,917,000 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 15 116 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 03 TUK-70 E Marginal Way S Overlay E Marginal Way S Interurban Avenue S to MP 2.27 Plane, pavement repair, pave, channelization, and repair of curb and gutter and sidewalk, as necessary. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 05 0.960 CE No Funding Status S S Phase PE CN Phase Start Year (YYYY) 2027 2028 Federal Fund Code NHPP NHPP Totals Federal Fun and Core State Funds 0 0 0 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd • 4th 5th & 6th PE 685,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 5,058,000 0 0 0 Totals 685,000 5,058,000 0 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Local Funds 0 0 0 Total Funds 685,000 5,058,000 5,743,000 Page 16 117 ANL Vieshin atan State 'I Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number L A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing a Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 05 WA-17043 E Marginal Way S Section 2 Sidewalk E Marginal Way S Interurban Ave S to S 120th PI Construct sidewalk on both sides of road segment. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 28 0.140 No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds Villillat State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2031 0 803,000 803,000 Totals ,111% 0 803,000 803,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd d 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 0 803,000 Totals 0 0 803,000 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 17 118 ANL 1117washingtan State 417 Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number L A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project DescriptionG. Structure ID03 Hearing icD. Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required WA-17049 Interurban Ave (140th St to S 144th St) Interurban Ave S 140th St to 144th St Construct two landscape medians, install RRFB's, and a new pedestrian crossing 06/08/26 28 0.270 No Funding illillP Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds V State Funds Local Funds Total Funds ALL 2031 0 1,484,000 1,484,000 Totals ,111% 0 1,484,000 1,484,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd d 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 0 1,484,000 Totals 0 0 1,484,000 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 18 119 ANL Vieshin atan state 'I Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number L A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing a Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 03 1391(004) TUK-66 Interurban Avenue S Overlay Interurban Avenue S E Marginal Way S to S 143rd Street Complete pavement repairs, overlay, and curb and gutter repair. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 05 2.250 CE No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds iiii V State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S CN 2027 NHPP 0 0 4,561,000 Totals 4,561, 0 0 4,561,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd d 4th 5th & 6th CN 356,100 0 0 0 Totals 356,100 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 19 120 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 05 WA-17054 Klickitat Dr (53rd Ave S to Southcenter Pkwy) 53rd Ave S to Southcenter Pkwy Multimodal improvements to improve connectivity and accessibility of existing path wayfinding, signage, width improvements, etc. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 28 0.410 CE No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Fun and Core State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2029 0 582,000 582,000 Totals 0 582,000 582,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0le\82, 0 0 Totals0 082,000 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 20 121 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number L A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 17 WA-11110 Macadam Rd S Complete Streets Project Macadam Road S 150th Street to S 144th Street Design and construction of a complete street on Macadam Road. Road widening and rechannelization to add 5-foot bike lanes and 5-foot sidewalks on both sides of the roadway. Includes illumination, curb, and storm drainage. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 04 0.350 CE No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal F Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P PE 2027 P ike Program 350,000 50,000 400,000 P RW 2028 ike Program 10,000 0 10,000 P CN 2029 0 ed/Bike Program 2,800,000 300,000 3,100,000 Totals 0 3,160,000 350,000 3,510,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 300,000 100,000 0 0 0 RW 0 100,000 0 0 0 CN 0 0 3,100,000 0 0 Totals 300,000 200,000 3,100,000 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 21 122 ANL 1117washingtan state 417 Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number L A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 05 WA-17028 06/08/26 Macadam Rd S Section 1 Sidewalk 42nd Ave S and Macadam Rd S S 124th St to S 130th St Construct sidewalk on west side of 42nd Ave S from S 124th St to entrance of 42nd Ave S Bridge, construct sidewalk on both sides of 42nd Ave S from entrance of 42nd Ave S Bridge to on Interboth ides Ave a Construct fromVP both sides of Macadam Rd S from Interurban Ave S to S 130th St. 0 /15/26 28 0.340 No Funding NW Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federa State Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2031 0 0 992,000 992,000 T 0 0 992,000 992,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3r 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 0 0 992,000 Totals 0 0 0 0 992,000 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 22 123 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 04 WA-17027 Minkler Blvd Section 2 Sidewalk Minkler Boulevard Andover Park W to Andover Park E Construct sidewalk on both sides of road segment 06/08/26 0 /15/26 28 No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Fun and Core State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2029 0 1,430, 000 1,430,000 Totals 0 1,430,000 1,430,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0le\30, 0 0 Totals0 030,000 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 23 124 ANL Vieshin atan state 'I Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number L A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 03 / 1230(007) TUK-67 Orillia Road South Overlay Orillia Road S S 200th Street to S 188th Street/WSDOT ROW Complete pavement repairs; overlay; and curb and gutter, sidewalk, and guardrail repair. Make minor improvements to channelization and improve safety near the 188th street intersection. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 05 0.640 CE No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal F Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S CN 2027 NHPP 1,204, 0 0 1,204,000 Totals 1,2 0 0 1,204,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3 4th 5th $ 6th CN 1,204,000 0 0 Totals 1,204,000 0 0 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 24 125 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 03 WA-17025 S 115th SUE Marginal Way Intersection Improvements E Marginal Way 300' South of S 115th St to 300' North of S 115th St Design and construct a new traffic signal, lighting, and pedestrian facilities, including crosswalks and pedestrian push buttons. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 03 0.000 No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Fun and Core State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2029 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 Totals 0 2,000,000 2,000,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0le\00, 0 0 Totals0 000,000 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 25 126 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number L A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 00 WA13494 S 119th St Pedestrian Bridge Painting S 119th Street Bridge West bank Duwamish River to East bank Duwamish River Ongoing maintenance of the S 119th Street Pedestrian Bridge in the Allentown/Duwamish neighborhoods. Painting of bridge is outstanding maintenance needed. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 2117 06 0.040 No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal F Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S CN 2027 0 200,000 200,000 Totals 0 200,000 200,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3 4th 5th $ 6th CN 200,000oi<1.1 0 0 Totals 200,000 0 0 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 26 127 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D a Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 05 WA-16476 S 124th St/50th PIS Reconfiguration S 124th Street 49th Ave S to 51 st PI S Reconfigure intersection to remove EB slip lane, new c/g/s on S 124th from 49th to 51 st, new paved shoulder walkway on south side of 124th connecting to existing walkway on west side of 50th Pk, new stormwater treatment/rain garden in old slip lane ROW. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 21 0.140 No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Feder- S Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PE 2027 TIB 101,000 29,000 130,000 S CN 2028 r TIB 796,300 225,200 1,021,500 Totals 0 897,300 254,200 1,151,500 Expenditure Schedule _ Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 50,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 1,021,500 0 0 0 Totals 50,000 1,021,500 0 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 27 128 ANL Vieshin atan state 'I Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D a Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 03 WA-15108 S 133 St/SR599 Southbound Intersection S 133rd Street SR 599 SB Ramp to Design and construct intersection improvements, which could include a new traffic signal orr aa roundabout, lighting, pedestrian facilities, and drainage. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 03 C G O P S TW 0.100 Yes Funding Status P P P Phase PE RW CN Phase Start Year (YYYY) 2028 2028 2029 Federal Fund Code T Federa 0 0 Fund Code TIB State Funds 0 0 1,620,000 1,620,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 0 400,000 0 0 0 RW 0 150,000 0 0 0 CN 0 0 2,700,000 0 0 Totals 0 550,000 2,700,000 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Local Funds 400,000 150,000 1,080,000 1,630,000 Total Funds 400,000 150,000 2,700,000 3,250,000 Page 28 129 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 07 WA-17045 S 141 st St Section 1 Sidewalk S 141st 37th Ave S to Tukwila International Boulevard Construct sidewalk on both sides of road segment 06/08/26 0 /15/26 28 0.120 No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Fun and Core State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P PE 2029 0 510,000 510,000 Totals 0 510,000 510,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0le\10, 0 0 Totals0 010,000 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 29 130 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 07 WA-17044 S 142nd St Sidewalk S 142nd St 37th Ave S to Tukwila International Boulevard Construct sidewalk on both sides of road segment 06/08/26 0 /15/26 28 0.130 No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Fun and Core State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2029 0 541,000 541,000 Totals 0 541,000 541,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 01(1141, 0 0 Totals0 041,000 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 30 131 ANL Vieshin atan state 'I Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure IDic Hearing Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 05 WA-17041 S 144th St Complete Street 42nd Ave S to 51 st Ave S accoewamfacdate on t lanes, side bof ter, and 1i 1 and-wayremove parking . one side tosidewalk and 1-10ft two-way cycle track. Construct sidewalk facilities on the south side of the street. 04 C G P S T W 0.500 CE No Funding Status P Phase ALL Phase Start Year (YYYY) 2030 Federal Fund Code Totals Federa Fund Code State Funds 0 0 Expenditure Schedule N/ Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 0 869,000 0 Totals 0 0 0 869,000 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Local Funds 869,000 869,000 Total Funds 869,000 869,000 Page 31 132 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 05 WA-17046 S 144th St Improvements (Military to TIB) S 144th St Military Rd S to Tukwila International Boulevard Construct sidewalk improvments, curb and gutter, install RRFB's, and a pedestrian refuge island 06/08/26 0 /15/26 28 0.310 No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Fun and Core State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2028 0 580,000 580,000 Totals 0 580,000 580,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 580,000 NN1 0 0 Totals 0 580,000 0 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 32 133 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D a Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 19 WA-11112 S 152nd Street Pedestrian and Bike Improvements S 152nd Street Tukwila International Blvd to 42nd Avenue S Install curb, gutter, sidewalks on S 152nd Street, including widening pavement and construction of a buffer between the roadway and sidewalk on the south side. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 05 C G O P S TW 0.300 CE Yes Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal F Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PE 2027 0 300,000 300,000 S RW 2027 0 230,000 230,000 P CN 2028 0 TIB 3,960,000 990,000 4,950,000 TotalsA 0 3,960,000 1,520,000 5,480,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 300,000 0 0 0 0 RW 230,000 0 0 0 0 CN 0 4,950,000 0 0 0 Totals 530,000 4,950,000 0 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 33 134 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 04 WA-17048 S 180th St (Sperry Drive to Interurban Trail) S 180th St Sperry Drive to Interurban Trail Construct shared use path on the north side and stall no turn on red phasing at 180th and Sperry Dr. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 28 0.280 No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Fun and Core State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2030 0 806,000 806,000 Totals 0 806,000 806,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 806,000 0 Totals 0 0 0 806,000 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 34 135 ANL 1117washingtan State 417 Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number L A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing a Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 05 WA-17021 S Norfolk St Bike Facilities S Norfolk Street E Marginal Way S to East city limit Add bike facilities on S Norfolk St 06/08/26 0 /15/26 28 P S T W 0.140 CE No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Funds Villillat State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2029 0 497,000 497,000 Totals ,111% 0 497,000 497,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd d 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 49 0 0 Totals 0 97,0 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 35 136 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D a Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 04 WA-15829 S Ryan Way SR 900 to 51 st Ave S pavement and intense rechannel S Ryan Way to improve appropriate. Resursafety. safety. Add pedestrian and bicycle facilities where appropriate. Signalize intersection with 47th Avenue S to accommodate future growth and improve safety. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 06 C G P S T W 0.500 No Funding Status S P P Phase PE RW CN Phase Start Year (YYYY) 2027 2028 2028 Federal Fund Code T Federa 0 0 Fund Code TIB TIB State Funds 0 200,000 8,650,000 8,850,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PE 1,275,000 0 0 0 0 RW 0 300,000 0 0 0 CN 0 12,760,000 0 0 0 Totals 1,275,000 13,060,000 0 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Local Funds 1,275,000 100,000 4,131, 000 5,506,000 Total Funds 1,275,000 300,000 12, 781, 000 14,356,000 Page 36 137 ANL wesrrin atan state 'I Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D a Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 04 WA-15813 Southcenter Blvd Bikeway and Pedestrian Crossing Upgrades Southcenter Boulevard International Boulevard to 42nd Avenue S Improve the existing bike lanes and crosswalks on Southcenter Blvd within a half - mile of Tukwila International Boulevard Station (TIES). Re-channelize to 11 ft general purpose lanes to accommodate separated bike lanes. Tighten intersection with 40th Ave S to shorten crossing distance. Add bike channelization and upgrade to high -visibility crosswalk markings at Southcenter Blvd/TIBS station entrance and Southcenter Blvd/42nd Ave S intersections. Aill l‘› 06/08/26 0 /15/26 28 C G P S T W No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) S CN 2027 Federal Fund Code Fed un e Fund Code Tota 0 0 State Funds Local Funds Total Funds 0 325,000 325,000 0 325,000 325,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th CN 325,000 0 0 0 0 Totals 325,000 0 0 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 37 138 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 05 WA-17022 SR 518 EB Off-ramp/Klickitat Dr Intersection Improvements Klickitat Drive 51 st Ave S to Klickitat Drive Design and construct a new traffic signal, lighting, and pedestrian facilities including crosswalks and pedestrian push buttons. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 03 P S W 0.020 CE No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Fun and Core State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2030 0 850,000 850,000 Totals 0 850,000 850,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 850,000 0 Totals 0 0 0 850,000 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 38 139 ANL wesr�in atan state 'I Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number L A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 04 WA-17029 Strander Blvd Sidewalk Strander Blvd and SW 27th St Christensen Rd to Interurban Trail Construct sidewalk on south side of Strander Blvd from Christensen Rd to W Valley Hwy. Construct sidewalk on both sides of Strander Blvd from W Valley Hwy to east boundary of Tukwila city limits ...iiimi.... 06/08/26 bailliP 0 /15/26 28 0.200 No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Fe Fund to and Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2029 0 0 467,000 467,000 TotalsA011111111L 0 0 467,000 467,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 467,000 0 0 Totals 0 0 467,000 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 39 140 ANL Viashin atan state 'I Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 03 WA-17039 TIB Section 2 Sidewalk (North) Tukwila International Blvd S 112th Ave to SR99 Construct sidewalk on east side of Tukwila International Blvd from S 112th St to the HW 99 Exit Ramp. 28 C G P S T W 0.260 CE No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal F Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2029 0 377,200 377,200 Totals 0 377,200 377,200 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 77,20 0 0 Totals 0 0 77,200 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 40 141 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 03 WA-17040 TIB Section 2 Sidewalk (South) SR 99 to 12400 Block Construct sidewalk on both sides of Tukwila International Blvd from the HW 99 Exit Ramp to 12400 Block. 28 C G P S T W 0.440 CE No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal F Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2029 0 1,672,800 1,672,800 Totals 0 1,672,800 1,672,800 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 72,8 0 0 Totals 0 0 72,800 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 41 142 ANL Viashin atan state 'I Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D a Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 00 WA-13491 Transportation Demand Management Implementation to Provision of TDM services to Commute Trip Reduction -affected employment sites. Facilitate employer reporting and records associated with biennial CTR survey. Engage CTR employment sites with opportunities for improvement and remain connected via technical meetings with other CTR jurisdictional representatives. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 44 0.000 No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Feder- S Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S ALL 2027 SDOT 103,200 0 103,200 P ALL 2028 r WSDOT 258,000 0 258,000 Totals 0 361,200 0 361,200 Expenditure Schedule _ Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 51,600 51,600 51,600 51,600 103,200 Totals 51,600 51,600 51,600 51,600 103,200 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 42 143 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number L A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 00 WA-17063 Tukwila and South King County TDM to Provide TDM services to help people use sustainable transportation options that increase access to opportunity, and reduce drive -alone travel and traffic congestion in Tukwila and South King County. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 18 No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal F Fund Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PL 2027 THER 832,000 208,000 1,040,000 Totals 832,000 208,000 1,040,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3 4th 5th & 6th PL 260,000 260,00 30,00 0 0 Totals 260,000 260,000 30,000 0 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 43 144 ANL 1117washingtan state 417 Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number L A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D c Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 00 TUK-69 Tukwila and South King County TDM Tukwila and South King County N/A to N/A This project will provide TDM programming and services to help people access sustainable transportation options that reduce drive -alone travel and traffic congestion in Tukwila and South King County. Tukwila's TDM Program reaches people regionally at employment centers, community hubs, multifamily housing complexes, and educational institutions. 06/08/26 0 /15/26 24 0.000 CE No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Fed St and Code State Funds Local Funds Total Funds S PL 2027 CMAQ SDOT 85,838 0 635,838 Totals , 0,000 85,838 0 635,838 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th & 6th PL 158,959 158,959 58,960 158,960 0 Totals 158,959 158,959 158,960 158,960 0 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 44 145 ANL washingtan state Departmental Transportation Agency: Tukwila County: King MPO/RTPO: PSRC Y Inside Six Year Transportation Improvement Program From 2027 to 2032 N Outside Functional Class Priority Number A. PIN/Project No. B. STIP ID C. Project Title D. Road Name or Number E. Begin & End Termini F. Project Description G. Structure ID Hearing D a Amendment Resolution No. Improvement Type Utility Codes Total Length Environmental Type RW Required 03 WA-17042 Tukwila International Boulevard (S 152nd St to S 144th St) S 152nd St to S 144th St Construct landscape median, refine corridor access, roadway diet, and multimodal lanes. 04 C P S W 0.530 CE No Funding Status Phase Phase Start Year (YYYY) Federal Fund Code Federal Fun and Core State Funds Local Funds Total Funds P ALL 2030 0 4,347,000 4,347,000 Totals 0 4,347,000 4,347,000 Expenditure Schedule Phase 1st 2nd 4th 5th & 6th ALL 0 0 4,347,000 0 Totals 0 0 0 4,347,000 0 ede, unds State Funds Local Funds Total Funds Grand Totals for Tukwila 43,635,306 40,561,338 65,774,200 149,970,844 Report Date: May 13, 2026 Page 45 146