Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit D97-0180 - OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE - BUILDINGCity of Tukwila Community Development / Public Works • 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WARNING: IF CONSTRUCTION BEGINS BEFORE APPEAL PERIOD EXPIRES, APPLICANT IS PROCEEDING AT THEIR OWN RISK. Streams: Parcel No: 262304 -9127 Permit No: 097 -0180 Address: 16510 SOUTHCENTER PY Status: ISSUED Suite No: Issued: 09/18/1997 Location: DOUBLETREE SUITES PARKING LOT Expires: 03/17/1998 Category: NRST Type: DEVPERM Zoning: TUC Const Type: V -N Occupancy: RESTAURANT Gas /Elec.: UBC: 1994 Units: 001 Fire Protection: SPRINKLERS Setbacks: North: .0 South: .0 East: .0 West: .0 Water: TUKWILA Sewer: TUKWILA Wetlands: Slopes: Y (206) 431- 3670;' Contractor License No:. TOBBCl223KD OCCUPANT OUTBACK:'STEAKHOUSE' 16510'SOUTHCENTER PY,..TUKWILA', WA 98188; OWNER SOUTHCENTER MOTEL HOTEL LTD C /O "POER':MARVIN F & COMPANY, 500 108TH AVE NE" #780,. BELLEVUE WA CONTRACTOR TQBB CONSTRUCTION 'Phon`e: 206 525 -1902 • 3016 NE BLAKELEY #1000, SEATTLE WA 98105 CONTACT ':.JIM 'HOLTZ .. Phone : 425,7,47-3177 1800 136TH PLACE'.N.E. #100, BELLEVUE, WA 98005 r************ r:*.*'*************** r************************* ******** *** ** *** *7k *** * *** * *• ** Permit Description: CONSTRUCT NEW RESTAURANT (6,163 S.F.) INSIDE THE EXISTT!NG'DOUBLE TREE SUITES. PARKING LOTAND PROVIDE:UTILITY CONNECTIONS: 1.5" PERM WM, DDCVA, SANITARY SIDE SEWER INCLUDING GREASE INTERCEPTOR AND STORM DRAINAGE. F****** * * * **r*** * * * ** * * * * * * ***r * * * * *** Mfr**************• k******* ** -k'k * * * **r * ** * * * **r * ** * **** Construction Valuation: $ 405,155.62 PUBLIC WORKS. PERMITS:. *(Water Meter Permits Listed Separate) Eng. Appr: JJS Curb Cut /Access /Sidewalk /CSS: N 'fire Loop Hydrant: Y No: Size(in) .00 Flood Control Zone: N Hauling: N Start Time: . End Time.: Land Altering: Y Cut: 300 Fill: Landscape Irrigation: Y Moving Oversized Load: N Start Time: End,. Time: Sanitary Side Sewer: Y No: Sewer Main Extension: N Private: N Public: N Storm Drainage: Y Street Use: N Water Main Extension: N 'Private:. N Public: N ************** r*•**************************** r************ * ** * * **r * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **c* * ***k TOTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FEES: $ 13,378.96 **** t******************************************** r****** * * * * *** * * * * * ** * * * * * * **-* ** ** * ** Permit Center Authorized Signature�11=9, Date: A:A I hereby certify that I have read and examined this permit and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of law and ordinances governing this work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provision of any other state or local laws regulating construction or the performance of work. I am authorized to sign for and obtain this development pe it.� Signature:_ Print Nam : __/ %) ‘iec4 ! This permit shall become null and void if the work is not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance, or if the work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days from the last inspection. Date rA Project Namefreunt: Date application expires: Value of Construction: Site Address: 5 . J 16 � 5a47H City State/Zip: G Airg.e. tilf9 ,(k 9g 1 �e kk:CG —L, L- co. 'ftt .S lfJ►Js. 11,1C . Tax Parcel Number: Phone:, n 2?4` 4- � 1 Zo 575 • go1 -O Property Owner: �4T.HC6)4TEt? M01n� Street Address: b 00 Soy - City State/Zip: — tom. • u.3 'r tc-W1 Fax #: Zob Contact Person: I'VP2.14.t� l P1JTz Ik q8I :f: 1TF.T - Q qa <, lM -‘icxx -. Phone: 0-12.G) 1 SI '7 Street Address: F4^- P 1.. ( City State/Zip: C IE 5 Fax #: (`-/z5 - g 7 7/ L/ 9 Contractor: —k C s,,- - euc low Co, Phone'/ ( ZeL) 52S• 1902 Street Address: i fs 1 ln PS,t L City State /Zip: l *lot) c9ATM bill} 9Z/0(0 Fax #: C 2- 0 25.1 to i Architect: Akee.�Gt- LE.4.nZ. R 41T Phone: Nz s) 7` 7.30 7 Street Address: City State /Zip: ker0 l3(0" a lie �t , .too BeAt 11uk - Wit 9S�ooc, Fax #: /' " i ( c2- S) 7 y 7- a L 7 Engineer: UCE .2 Coql lr phone: ( 2s') 3 a . ? .019 Fax #: � y z51 DS( • 3o i9 Street Address: 1 211 f�M21C� S • City State/Zip: k o b q god Description of work to be done: Ale.to ,e6S7,41-Ike.4AJY- (G,i 3 SF m l Date application expires: Exi�t;ng use: CI Retail fl Restaurant ❑ Multi - family • ❑ Warehouse ❑ Church ❑ Manufacturing ❑ MoteUHotel ❑ Office ❑ School/College/University ® Other {'iZ.k.1.1(s1 LSJ'j El Hospital Proposed use: ❑ Retail 51 Restaurant ❑ Multi- family ❑ Warehouse ❑ Church ❑ Manufacturing ❑ MoteUHotel ❑ Office ❑ School /College /University ❑ Other Hospital Will there be a change of use? ❑ yes lgi no If yes, extent of change: Existing fire protection features: fi=t sprinklers ❑ automatic fire alarm ❑ none ❑ other (specify) Building Square Feet: /5 existing (., tlow new Area of Construction: /a619 &? Will there be storage of flammable /combustible hazardous material in the building? Attach list of materials and storage location on separate 8 1/2 X 11 paper indicating ❑ yes VI no quantities & Material Safety Data Sheets Date application accepted: , r, (� Date application expires: I (� Application to y; (initials) 51 Channelization/Striping ❑ Flood Control Zone ❑ Moving an Oversized Load: El Sanitary Side Sewer #: 7 1 Storm Drainage ❑ Water Meter /Exempt #: NCPERMIT.DOC 7/9/96 CITY OF Ti 'KWILA Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 ❑ Curb cut/Access /Sidewalk ❑ Fire Loop /Hydrant (main to vault) #: ❑ Hauling M Land Altering 0 Cut 5oc. cubic yds. Start Time: End Time: ❑ Sewer Main Extension 0 ❑ ❑ Water Main Extension 0 0 Deduct Street Use Size(s): ❑ Water Meter /Permanent # Size(s): I 1 /,," ❑ Water Meter Temp # Size(s): Est. quantity: gal Schedule: ❑ Miscellaneous New Commercial / Addition / Multi - Family Permit Application Application and plans must be complete In order to be accepted for plan review. Applications will not be accepted through the mall or facsimile. APPLICANT :REQUEST FOR PUBLIC WORKS SITE /CIVIL PLAN REVIEW: OF.THE-FOLLOWING: (Addltlonal reviews may deternilned by thePublic'Works Department) Private 0 Public Private 0 Public 0 Water Only Size(s): 0 Fill cubic yds. Value of Construction - In all cases, a value of construction amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be reviewed and is subject to possible revision by the Permit Center to comply with current fee schedules. Expiration of Plan Review - Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the applicant as defined in Section 107.4 of the Uniform Building Code (current edition). No application shall be extended more than once. BUILD G • WNER OR AUT. . - 1 ED , GENT: Siynatur ∎�_ ���� Date: c-c-/ qq Print na e: J I I M 1 /nuTZ _ / �� Phone rvos 74173/77 City/State/Zip: ie&l /E UUG. Fax #: ( Cam- c c 3 S /? Address: L 6 0 O 1, vo Pe, ivv , e ALL NEW COMMERCVAL /ADDITION /I. ❑ al Topographical and Boundary Survey I� ❑ Tree Coverage Analysis (Multifamily only ) NCPERMIT.DOC 7/5/96 I- FAMILY PERMIT APPLICATIONS M BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FOLLOWING: ALL DRAWINGS TO BE STAMPED BY WASHINGTON STATE LICENSED ARCHITECT, STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OR CIVIL ENGINEER ALL DRAWINGS SHALL BE AT A LEGIBLE SCALE AND NEATLY DRAWN • BUILDING SITE PLANS AND UTILITY PLANS ARE TO BE COMBINED N/A SUBMITTED ❑ p3 Complete Legal Description gr ❑ Certificate of water /fire flow availability (Form H -11a). Contact the Public Works Department (206) 433- 0179 for servicing district. PI ❑ Certificate of sewer availability (Form H -11). Contact the Public Works Department (206) 433 -0179 for servicing district. ❑ ❑ Metro: Non - Residential Sewer Use Certification if there is a change in the amount of plumbing fixtures (Form H -13). Business Declaration required (Form H -10). Five (5) sets of working drawings, which include : ❑ '� Site Plan 1. North arrow and scale. " 2. Existing and proposed utilities and existing hydrant location(s). 3. Property lines, dimensions, setbacks, names of adjacent roads, any proposed or existing easements. 4. Parking Analysis of existing and proposed capacity; proposed stalls with dimensions. 5. Location of driveways, parking, loading & service areas, with parking calculations & location & type of dumpster recycling screening. 6. Location and screening of outdoor storage. 7. Limits of clearing /grading with existing & proposed topography at 2' intervals extending 5' beyond property's boundaries, erosion control measures & three buffer protection measures. 8. Identify location of sensitive areas slopes 20% or greater, wetlands, watercourses and their buffers (TMC 18.45.040). 9. Identify location and size of existing trees, note by size and species those to be maintained and those to be removed. 10. Landscape plan with irrigation: Existing trees to be saved by size and species. Proposed: Include size, species, location and spacing. Location of service areas and vault with proposed screening. 11. Location of high water mark of the Green /Duwamish River if site is located within 200' of the high water mark. 12. Lowest finished floor elevation (if flood control zone permit required). 13. Civil plans to include size of water supply to sprinkler vault with documentation from contractor stating supply line will meet or exceed sprinkler system design criteria as identified by the Fire Department. 14. See Public Works Checklist for detailed civil /site plan information required for Public Works Review (Form H -9). Vicinity Map showing location of site r• p ❑ P Building Elevations (Include dimensions of all building facades and major architectural elements) ❑ gl Mechanical Drawings ❑ p Structural Drawings (detail of sprinkler hangers, pipe, duct & vent penetrations in structure) ❑ Architectural drawing$ ❑ Specifications (if separate document) ❑ it Structural Calculations ❑ Ca Sprinkler structural calculations indicating load of water - filled sprinkler piping ❑ xi Height Analysis ❑ pn Soils Report stamped by Washington State licensed Geotechnical Engineer ❑ Washington State Energy Code Data and Non - Residential Energy Code Compliance Form H -7 )71 ❑ Completed Land Use Applications if not previously submitted (i.e. SEPA, BAR, Variance, Shoreline or Tree permit) ❑ Attach plans, reports or other documentation required to comply with Sensitive Area Ordinance or other land use or SEPA decisions ❑ ggi Food service establishments require two (2) sets of stamped approved plans by the Seattle -King County Department of Public Health prior to submitting for building permit application. The Department of Public Health is located at 201 Smith Tower, Seattle, WA or call (206) 296 -4787. (Form H -5) ❑ TEI Copy of Washington State Department of Labor and Industries valid Contractor's License. If no contractor has been selected at time of application a copy of this license will be required before the permit is issued OR submit Form H -4, "Affidavit in Lieu of Contractor Registration ". Building Owner /Authorized Agent if the applicant Is other than the owner, registered architect/engineer, or contractor licensed by the State of Washington, a notarized letter from the property owner authorizing the agent to submit this permit application and obtain the permit will be required as part of this submittal, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER` BOULEVARD,' SUITE 100 TUK;WILA, WASHINGTON 98188 THIS CERTIFICATE ISSUER PURSUANT, TO: :THE REQUIREMENTS OFSECTIOU. 109 Of THE 'UNIFORM'' BUILDING CODE CERTIFYING THAT AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE THIS STRUCTURE WAS IN COMPLIANCE WItH' THE,; VARIOUS.: ORDINANCES OF; THE. =CITY :REGULATING BUILDING ' CONSTRUCTION" OR USE = -AND ALL.'- APPLICABLE CITY FIRE CODES FOP ::THE FOLLOWING cuparlt OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE Bcri ldin�x. Address... 1651O 'SOUTHCENTEP PY 0Otupanc '= RESTAURANT Occup nc.V' Group . A=.3 BUILDIN OFFICIAL 2.62304 = 9127.,.;. tiOUTHCENTER:: MHTEL HOTEL LTD CONSTRUCT NEW' RESTAURANT (6,163 a. :F..) INSIDE THE EXISTING DOUBLE TREE SUITE'S PARKING LOT AND PROVIDE UTILITY ' CONNECTIONS: 1.5" ; PERM WM, DDCVA, SANITARY SIDE SEWER INCLUDING GREASE INTERCEPTOR AND . S ORM DRAINAGE. Permit No: 097, -0180 Suite No: Oct'upan.t. Load: 220 . Type of Const :. V -N THIS CERTIFICATE MU',T BE,.CONSPICUOUS.LY POSTED ON THE PREMISE'S • Address 16510 SOUTHCENTER PY Tenant: Type: DEVPERM ' Parcel It: 2623049127 • .-. CITY OF TUKWILA Permit No: D97-0180 Status: ISSUED Applied: 06/09/1997 Issued: 09/18/1997 Permit Conditions: work will be inspected bx.that agency (-24 ***********************k*************************kh**********: *** *** County DepartmentqU:RublicHealth. Plumbing will be inspected by that agency, including all gas piping 1. No changes will be made to the plans unless approved by the State Division of Labor and Industries and all electrical (296-4722). Architect or Engineer and the, Tukwila Building Division 2 Plumbing permits shall be obtained through the Seattle- 4. All mechanical work shall be .under separate permit issued by 3. Electrical permits shall obtained through the Washington . , ' , Kin , , , • ,. . . the City .'cif Tukwila 5. All permits, inspection records, and approved plans shall be available at the job site prior to the start at any Con struction. - documents are to be maintained and ,avail-, able until final inspection approval is granted. _, 6. All structural concrete shall be special inspected -(UBC - Sec.x'506(a)1). 7. Bolts installed in .concrete shall be special inspected, (UBC Sec 1701 . . 2 B. When special Inspection is required either the owner, , , . architect or engineer shall notify the Tukwila Building Division of appointment of the inspection agencies prior to thefIrst :building inspection. Copies of all special inspection reports shall be submitted to the Building Division in 'a timely manner. Reports shall contain address - project, name, permit number and type at inspection being ,. per The special inspector shall submit a final signed report stating whether the work requiring special inspection was, to the best of the inspector's knowledge, in conformance ' with approved plans and specification and the applicable workmanshivprovisions of the UBC. 10. Any new ceiling grid and light fixture installation is required to meet lateral bracing requirements for Seismic Zone 3. 1.1. Suspended ceiling system is scheduled_on to be in stalled in accordance bracing requir- ements of UBC Standard 25-2, Part Light fixtures weigh ing < 56 pounds shall have, in adddition to the required support wires, two No. 12 gage hangers connected from the fi xture housing to the structure above. These wires may be slack; Lighting fixtures weighing 56 pounds or more shall be supported directly from the structure above by approved hangers. 12. Any exposed insulations backing material shall have a Flame Spread Rating of 25 or less, and material shall bear identi fication showing the fire performance rating thereof. 13. Subgrade preparation .including drainage, excavation, compaction, and fill requirement shall conform strictly with recommendations given in the soils report. 14. A statement from the roofing contractor verifying fire retardant class of roof will be required prior to final inspection (see attached procedure). All construction to one in conformance wit proved plans and requireme of the Uniform Building e (1994 Edition) as amended, Uniform Mechanical Code. (1994 Edition), Washington State Energy Code (1.994 Edition). 16: All food preparation establishments must have Seattle -King County Department of Public Health sign -off prior to opening or doing any food. processing. Arrangements for final Health Department inspection should be made by calling Seattle -King County Department of Public Health, 296-4787, at least three working days prior to desired inspection date. On work requiring Health Department approval, it is the contractor's responsibility to have a set of plans approved by that agency on the job site. . Notify the .City of Tukwila Building Division prior to placing any concrete : This';'procedur e; is in addition to any requirements for special : inspection. 18. All wood to remain in placed: concrete shall be treated wood. 19. There shall be no occupancy of the building(s) until the final inspection has been completed by the Tukwila Building inspector . A` CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL BE REQUIRED THIS PERMIT. 21. Temporary:,erosion.:;,control measures, shall be implemented as the tirstr order: of business to prevent sedimentation . , site or ;into existing storm drainage.. facilities. The site shall have permanent erosion control measures in place soon as possible after, final grading has been completed and prior to the Final Inspection. 23. Work affecting flows shall. be, closely coordinated, wiWithe City Utilities Inspector Traffic Control Plans, shall � be submitted-to the '�Inspector for ..prior approval • It h`al.l be verified in wait °,ing to :the' 'City Utilites Inspector that the fire loop for .the ' building; con a State?Depar,tmentof Health approved detector " '' double check valve:;as:embl ':`,This sha°ll., be done prior to the' °F#i na l Inspect ion" 25. All F, ub.l valve assemblies -- sha l l `"be app = roved by.the State ° Department of Health. 26. The Land Altering Permit fee is based upon. an , estimated: 300 `cy; of' f i l l . If the final quantity exceeds this amount, the developer shall ' be required to calculate' the final quantity and pay the difference in permit fee prior to: Final Inspection. 27. Hauling over50'cy shall require application fora Hauling Permit prior to any associated activity. 28. It shall be verified in writing: to the Utilities Inspector that the landscape,;irrigation system. contains a State Department of Heal.h: approved double check valve assembly. This shall be done\prior, to the Final Inspection. 29. All private storm drain pipe shall be either concrete or reinforced ADS pipe. Treated corrugated metal pipe may be used for detention facilities. 30. The exempt meter work shall include a State Department of Health approved double check valve assembly. 31. Contractor shall follow all the recommendations and conditions of the geotech report including the "Supplemental Geotech Letter" dated Sept 5, 1997. 32. DEVELOPER SHALL CONTACT PW UTILITY INSPECTOR TO SCHEDULE A PRECON MEETING; DETAILS OF THE SANITARY SEWER CROSSING SHALL BE DISCUSSED. DEVELOPER SHALL SUBMIT SCHEDULE (DAYS & HOURS OF CONSTRUCTION) , METHOD OF SANITARY SEWER PI- PE CROSSING TO ASSURE THAT THE SEWER PIPE WILL MAINTAIN THE DESIGNED GRADE. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FOR CORE DRILLING SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL. ALL GEOTECH STATUS REPORTS SHALL BE 'SUBMITTED TO PUBLIC WORKS IN A TIMELY: MANNER . • PRIOR TO FINAL' • THE GEOTECH ENGINEER OF: HAS +`TQ. °CER;TIF,Y'.TH.AT E: `SANITARY • `CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROVED PLAN ,PR•IOR : TO FINAL SIGN`.OF:F' APP.LICANT`.; SHALL, SUBMIT UTILITY. S`ITE•. PLAN TO: PUBLIC` WORI•S FOR CIT.Y;: RECORDS ** * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * .* * ** * * * * ** * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * *fr ** CITY , OF TUKWILA, WA. — ( { TRANS,MIT **.**************.**** * * *� * * * * * * * * * * * * *k * * * * * * * * * * *.* TRANSMIT° ;Number: R9700644 Amount: 23,064.75:09/18 /97 10:3;7 ;Payment Method: CHECK. Notation: EVERGREEN REST Init KJP Permit No: D97-0180 Type UEVPERM DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Parcel No: 262304 -9127. Site Address: 16510 SOUTHCENTER PY Location: DOUBLETREE SUITES PARKING LOT Total Fees: 24,635.96 This Payment 23,064.75 Total ALL Pmts: 24,635.96 Balance: .00 *********** k****** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Account Code Description ' Amount 000/322.100 BUILDING- NONRES 2,4 000/345.830 PLAN CHECK - UTILITY 30.00 000/345.830 PLAN CHECK - WATER METER 20.00 000/386.904 STATE BUILDING SURCHARGE 4.50 401/342.400 INSP FEE - FLH /LI /WME 30.00 412/342.400 INSP FEE - STORM DRAIN 15.00 402/342.400 INSP - SME /SSS 20.00 402/388.102 SEWER HOOK -UP 8,600.00 401/388.102 WATER CONNECTION 450.00 401/386.520 WATER INSTALLATION (DEP) 700.00 401/342.400 WATER INSPECTION FEE 30.00 401/343.405 WATER TURN -ON FEE 50.00 104.367.000 TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEES 10,632.00 000/322.100 LAND ALTERING PERMIT FEE . 43.50 000/345.830 LAND ALTERING PLAN CHECK 22.50 4232 09/19 9717 TOTAL 23064.75 * * * * ** * ** * * * * * * ** ** CITY OF TUKWILA. WA ***** *fir ** * * * * ** Ao1 ** TRANSMIT Number: R Payment Method: C Permit No: Parcel 'No: SiteAAddress: * * ** *. * * *r'.*** * Q9 - 1 - ** 9700594 Amou HECK Natati 097 -0180 Ty 262304 -9127 16500 SOUTHCE pe: DEVPERM NTER ,PY Total F Total ALL P [JalR ************ * * * * * * * * * * * ** *3 * ** * * * ** * * * * * * *3 This Payment 1.571.21 Account Code Descript 000/345.830 PLAN CHE •A * *Ikt Ask * **** ** ** *A7VA k*,* AA** *:. *. TRANSMIT * * * *k * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *1� *k *. * * ** nt: 1.571 .21 06/09/97 13:45 on: EVERGREEN STATE Init:.SLR ion CK - NONRES DEVELOPMENT PEkMIT mts: 3092.96 1.;;71.21 nee: 2.421.75 * * * *: * * * * * * * * * *! *d * *. ** Amount" 1.571.'1. 1167 06/09 9717 TOTAL. 1571.21 Project: j Type of inspecti rr~� A 1 Address: ` 0 6C Pew &Date called: .! , . Special instructions: Date wanted: /2_—/2...q? : a.m. R Phone No.: . INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: Inspector: I Receipt No.: INSPECTION RE.ORD Retain a copy witiermit t 7- 0/ PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. Date: $42.00 REINSPECT! N FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: Project: I Type of inspection: Address: I 1 0 5 0 . � 1 Pa -, a? ry Date called: ► -11 -' Special instructions: Date wanted: ! 1 �v�`] �ac / P.m. Requester ice - ( Phone No.: ` " _7 13)? INSPECTIO NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 COMMENTS: f s id hu Approved per applicable codes. $42.00 REINSPECTIONVFEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. I Receipt No.: INSPECTION R RD Retain a copy Wit ermit ,• ��. , `:. ^.* PERMIT NO., (206). 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. Date: Project: Type of inspection: �� Address: Date called: Special `instructions: Date wanted: Requester: ' / Phone No.: INSPECTION R F RD Retain a copy wit„,ermit INSPECT I• NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 9818 Approved per applicable codes. I , ] Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 3 r-t7-76be 4,01 Inspector: Iwo feinowt ' , AV ' Id ( $42.00 R NSPECTI • N FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Date: PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Project: 0 Ac k ... � � ,. , l/t` =�` � I , 0 , F of inspe i r i ct /�, v � ( ss: se, Date j Special instructions: p, AST 11 QG Date wanted: (,i,,,$ .c.. m. Requester: j ' n f c1 Phone No.: 5-7S- , r t Approved per applicable codes. COM MENTS: Inspector: I 1 Receipt No.: INSPECTION R RD Retain 'a copy net ermit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Dr1-0l g o✓ PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. Date: / $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: Project ! v ()l.t. &4C.�C JcZL6r Type of inspection: (1.et.Ltir) Ccye -Co dit �..� pct A I i o . `ti �.. Z Date called! �1A . L+ _97 Special instructions: 2.--60 I�, � Date wanted: 1 2_5_9 - 1 _ Requester: / w �(� Phone No.: INSPECTION R RD 7 2- 7 7 Retain a copy w► , hermit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. $42.0 ' EINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: COMMENTS: l-c1 C 1 / 41.- 9 in.6V Aran Eli a— -- 1 I w(1 yz___ )1 fl._ - Nt� --, r ill t- 5!' 6 etv (406_ ( t f t iQ jt 11 7 j4( ,C. z 'r t ,I us, rta .6.1'• /"1/.., . 5 IA PP L l RS ' rite oi"3?.1 p'7 Gl:1V I ' fA-rt t. i t ill 7� c�NO/7 t NA 2 4,(24, j fG SuG4' 14. /Ltror` 1.0 & 2 6C 5 e e14- wA 14J I fJSuc pr ... TL r /-0.} -o I r i t 14 OS r•101 nk.D SPi -c_ ( CAN OS t k +,T' 900— fi-i1. Lu- 1 f )iL !m 117 rJ 6 NazL. Iu t jtb i - 7,J . A-- t) / P rw vt D " ( , S .,n a usrl..v/.1 Ai IL- S: (tcC"S ti r-MC, 1-4- -.. (...v,1 t,J t T 14-t►l (72 ' CIC (:/-6tl l+— it* o C4.. Ut N-CO N 14 1 /ES. Pro ect: WJlC Type of insp c Ion: Ad ress: �L,sio �)Al) C ht L f Date called: C_ Pc.� -e.,L. !-�N - � ,c, \,1„, Special instructions: Date wanted: a.m. )Z. Requester: Phone No.: 595.0L p r I I Approved per applicable codes. [Receipt No.: INSPECTION R * RD Retain a copy wi - rmit • . INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter. Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date: PERMIT NO.. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. Inspector: J 4 .��. Date: 1. $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Project: Project: ,‹ Fsac , Type of inspection: 0o_di) & )\ W\ Address: cip.irI Date calle 9 Special instructions: _paNe.t .0,t,, = ( .S.S Date wanted: 1) i - 97 a. . Requester: k / , j , I (Q.UM Phone No.: .") J 7S-t I L, INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 1 Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RF„FQRD Retain a copy wi rmit i it 1 PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: Inspector: 1 (:S4 .t. j....... Date: 11 I $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Project: 6 (" 1 . Type of inspec 1 / .. C04 LA Aa411-4-Tx Addrelt: 40Al Date called : 1\4 m Special instructions: I ..10 LLi 7.11 ,_<113,(e Date wanted: a.m. )1 P.m. Requester: Phone No.: 57-0 f. , • . , • . . • • ' • . , ..•. • • •• • ' „. ."." • . • ' , . ' - • b Retain a copy wifiejermit INSPECTION RVQIRD INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 DVApproved per applicable codes. I Receipt No.: I I PERMIT NO. (206) 431-3670 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: *I • Date: ( 1,(1 (, ) $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: • 'Is. Project: te.' AC<<- -S" -- a Type of inspection: - "rk % C,S Address: ) (i61 S.(.-. PK....i1 Date called: Special instructions: Date wanted: V 1 a.m. Cn Requester: ,/' ,�JJG . � r Phone No.: INSPECTION RC 'QRD Retain a copy wi1&,,,.,, ermit O. . CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION . 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date: 19_) o' PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. I I Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: i yo(S)� ( i 1 1 Inspector: Date: ►'I2.S. f `!) $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Project: • Type of inspection:, Address: . j_ 11PS10,: GIAV1CC -Atrl 1 Date called: r r�-1-' I1 3. • •. .r,1N,?a,,. Special instructions: (: Date wanted: • •I1 = , - 7 a.ma . Requester: Phone No.: 575 t INSPECTION NO.' CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: Receipt No.: INSPECTION RF'QRD Retain a copy wiermit b97-0 Fd / j PERMIT NO. (206) 431- 3670.: Corrections required prior to approval. C CARS I -frh9 Wta S t4M 1 S �v IffAC, al - IG��� -•1 wA -�,u.4 Inspector: Date: 11 2 S /�j I $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: Project: t c U.(T7 C-r -.�C K.— Type of inspection: nI niG Address: he sro S.C. px Date called: Special instructions: Date wanted: Z 5/� / ? a.m. P.m. Requester: t iii Phone No.: INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RVQRD Retain a copy wit .,,,, rmit PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 [ Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: T o�� r– G, — C `kqt s t e ■a A. U i $J Inspector :(' Date: /t 2 [1 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED: Prior to Inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Project a of inspec 'on: ; Addres : C/ � . ((1 ..(U so, ?4-IN Date called: ail'1cj ,- i Special instructions: Date wanted:. / a.m. ii 10 Requester: Phone No.. 5 Oq &Cp INSPECTION R'QRD Retain a copy wi& krmit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION \` 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 N r Approved per applicable codes. bl %Q PER MIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 COMMENTS: 1- ,4/ Date: //4 Corrections required prior to approval. Inspector el" pi $42.00 REINSPECTION EE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. f Receipt No.: Date: 4 INSPECTION NO. • CITY OF.TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300. Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 9818 Project: , Type of inspection: Address: Date called: k Special instructions: Date wanted: a.m. " ° 1 ` 1 p.m. Requester: Phone No.: 515 �1� I COMMENTS: Inspector: Approved per applicable codes. $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: INSPECTION. R Retain a copy wi RD .' 'rmit PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. Project: S Type of insp Ion: Address: l c $ i o s C gfai Date called h 3 Special instructions: Date wanted: / / S�!r (a:m? p.m. Requester: Phone No.: INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION R RD Retain a copy wi k rmit • rir S PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. MMENTS: Inspector: Date: /r / 3/ (] $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: • u Project: � LA C _ � `J 1� Type of inspeptio — n�. � 1 1 . N Address: � � 5� 1 S.0 . �I(� r� Date called: I ` f t_ Special instructions: Date wanted: \ j (2 q7 ,a m p.m. Requester: \H Phone No.: I � • INSPECTION NO. • CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 981 Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION R .. RD Retain a copy wifk PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 OMMENTS: Inspector: Date: ( l b 2 1 (1? Corrections required prior to approval. $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Project: Type of inspection: Address: kR i S.C. e rA4 . \ Date called: h i ( ti Special instructions: Date wanted: 1% I r 2441 a.m. p.m. Requester: I Phone No.: PERMIT NO. INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: Inspector: Date: al(2(g1 Receipt No.: INSPECTION RRD Retain a copy Wi rmit (206) 431 -3670 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: Project it1/44 %'(fi' � + 1 . T e of inspectioGW Al , Address 0 piwA Date called: Special instructions: Date wanted: '' / fT - 1 - 1. Requester: K am_ Phone No.: 575 04 gco INSPECTION NO. • CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 CO MENTS: Approved per applicable codes. h ififq7 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. f Inspector: L eceipt No.: INSPECTION REC`RD Retain a copy with..irmit Date: PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. Date: Project: A- ac.... Type of inspe hon. pt-L-1 LAA146 Address: , c . e Date called: Date wanted: / /U i /IMI Special instructions: 1 Requester: Phone No.: INSPECTION NO. CITY 'OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION • 6300.SoUthcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 CK Approved per applicable codes. Receipt No.: INSPECTION RE D Retain a copy with rmit I I PERMIT NO. (206) 431-3670 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: ).11 A . 4 ._ r. $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection,'fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: 4 Project: �r�0 G Type of inspection: Address: Date called: //_ G Special instructions: . t-r-. Date wanted: / a m. // 0 Requester: Phone No.: INSPECTION NO. CITY OFTUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 [ - . - Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: &vr fit-o7(51-7 1 T7t-6 -rov j Ge►O Lc -.. Awla t ors --rc+c , /mo p [InsPector: I I Date: r �)/ 0 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. L eceipt No.: INSPECTION RE Retain a copy wit Date: (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. .f Project: O of inspection: G . Address: Date called: Special instructions: 2 /v.i' Date wanted: `A f G -'/ Requester: Phone No.: INSPEC 0 0. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 - 3670 I Approved per applicable codes. Inspector: !Receipt No.: INSPECTION RED Retain a copy rmit ( 9 . . 1 - 4 0 , 6 / /e/' C.t> C • 5 i atao PERMIT NO. Corrections required prior to approval. MMENTS: cs:7 /3 r � it. „,m (A A WP Date: I iek Ads $42.00 REINSPECTIO r FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, f must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: Project: t ,Type of inspect' 11;,... Address: //jam ��00 Date called: Special instructions: Date wanted:1 17 a.m. Requester: r Phone No.: INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: F L . Inspector: - [Receipt No.: INSPECTION RED Retain a copy witi,,Jrmit r� $42 � REINSPECTIO FEE EQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: Date: (206) . 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. Project: 0 Type of inspecti•n: -�'� . L- Address: �. /� s. �d Lsr. eey Date called: Special instructions: Date wanted: / / J '" 5 2 Requester: Phone No.: CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 INSPECTION NO. Approved per applicable codes. [Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: e ,- L/ca ,-h Inspector $42.00 REINSPECTIO FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: /VHF (6 INSPECTION RED Retain a copy witl* ) mit Date: Date: PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Project: - p t3T $(�C K `jam E A K Hu uF Type of inspection/sf jt/ 14-4 6 S ��� : 4�f Address: 1X516 5)1A ee,Ct42 i/ Date called: 11 t - 1 - `\1 Special instructio s: - C \0 � wanted: w Date an \1 -5 -cfl a.m. Requester: 211 Phone No.: oto 6 1S L I3to INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RE D Retain a copy wit rmit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. CCiMMENTS: I .404.cio . c.✓w // c 5 - 4.0.0•4 /? sak-a 9r- Inspector r eceipt No.: 1 b91 PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Date: REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: Project:.. >� / U. CA dC Type of ' spe Kcz>i J h Ca -�lurn c Address: Date called: Special instructions: ELy . a l Date wanted: a.m. I 3I "97 Requester: s k.elly Phone No.: .s INSPECTION RE Retain a copy,wit mit INSPECTION O. CITY OF TWO/VILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300' #100, Tukwila, WA .98188 .Inspector: Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. ti bps) 0.10 V PERMIT NO: El $42.00 REINSPECTIO FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. [Receit No.: Date: (206) 431 -3670 Date: COMMENTS: Type of inspectio : Root l ac•,M1.... /414..ic ar l t t,P/OCLJS rill- tic,-0 Anc 1.40 vv1/4A t1 w i OF n K x'1+1' G I4 tit) (".earl 5 9 -.ii C S r t ''" 714-IS IS A- Grt1 RC tA- 19 A Ct t C.. f R.'W cr ok (mu- t.M1r`o 71 R._ R zseic sc -wr 'It c ti i"ti-,S Pp, .0 16:F o- Amt SP�'LS , Date wanted: rani) Requester v. 0\y Phone No.: 5-15 - ug a Project: D LT' &Ic1L 576A Kfiot�1 Type of inspectio : Root Address: Address: 00516 . 0 C tom/ Date called: Jd a9 - 77 Special instructions: 1°' Date wanted: rani) Requester v. 0\y Phone No.: 5-15 - ug • • INSPECTION RE D Retain a copy. wittmit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. XISorrections required prior to approval. Inspector: Date: - $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to Inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: • Project: LAA 1 A Ck..- C - Type of in ection: ac1F ZYKI - ) - C, Address: s. C p Date called: / O 1 Special instructions: Date wanted: ,A a.m. Requester: Phone No.: tY7 INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 9818 COMMENTS: 0(31 A Cc.� Inspector: Date:) 04,c Approved per applicable codes. ` required prior to approval. $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: INSPECTION RE Retain a copy witii,,Irmit Date: PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Yf i�3 Project: / / ,1 r � J Type of inspection ! Address: 5/, Sp .2r /may Date called: Special instructions: ` l , . /1490d f - , /-t3 Date wanted: /��'� a.m. r7 Requester: Phone No.: Inspector: INSPECTION NO. COMMENTS: r eceipt No.: INSPECTION RE Retain a copy wit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. D mit Date: J PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. ( $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: Project: all 4 Type of inspecf • '"!a-7 Address:. d A� ;7a /3 , Date called: /07o — y� Special instructions: ` ? a) Ar -, Date wanted: /C7/47 �. Requester: / r /7 Phone No.: s ... 7 76 7 r'°, I'. PERMIT NO. fl L ct No.: INSPECTION RE Retain a copy wit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 9818 Approved per applicable codes. (206) 431 -3670 MMENTS: Sear..- t Ns ec� OF 9S 111- -F iS 014 .SITL - N\ Pa-66G0 SLA.6 114Sc1C44'v *4 IS APfL.AIN . Date: J 4 0 1 9 , 7 Corrections required prior to approval. $42.00 REINSpECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: ,,oject: vykr T ` e of i s setion: ddr , s: D S , C n' n r c` , 1"t Qi called: Special instructions; ! t Date mated: R e q u ester: ` ' • I I Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTIO NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 COMMENTS: 1 j Oh S - , ,oz2 f 4 4 4 Receipt No.: Date: INSPECTION RE D Retain a copy wit mit PERMIT (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. - $42.Is ION F E REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. t o C il sit wn0v-se Gple`"tol.! v-e4`) ,tf _r s sen+r , R Date called:, V P1 ,3 - Special instructions: Oei, • 30 . r Gvf Date wanted:t 0 „co ^ q.-7 Requester: e\ \ � Phone Noqq q 3 . INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. 'COMMENTS: Inspector: INSPECTION RED Retain a copy wit :nit I1 ,/1 /4". Corrections required prior to approval. Date: (206) 431 -3670 $42.00 REINSPECTIO FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: >.E 5 ect: Ty • - , inspection: WSW A Addr s : • 1� �n �= C�,x��n -� � {�L 1.... � '1( �L Special instructions: gS a R u�c� esterQ t 0—i-9 ' Phone.tlo S .t; Approved per applicable codes. [Receit No.: INSPECTION RE Retain a copy wit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: t4- 1 f'T /Pn.. jk L w r.l " �a Date: I /0 11 )q-i n $42.00. REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6$00 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection, Date: 1 -algo • PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 ,. • ..,. Project: Type of.inspection: •Z — C " Address: 6 S /b SC � Date called: 9 0-Z -- ,7 Special in tructions: /0 00 .;; ' VC_ � Date wanted: Requester: // fr:</ EC- Phone No.: 9 / f - . 33 0 3 .l INSPECTIO NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 V tii.A Approved per applicable codes. C MENTS: Inspector INSPECTION RE D Retain a copy with ,.. it 0 , PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. Date: 1 /4 ( - 1 $42.0 � ' EINSPECTIO FEE RE UIRED. Prior to inspection, fee ust be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Authorized Signature °Iw,...... ��:',iti: , : a �,.• 1'. �i.• tiv. t�� .i'�T°.'�'� City of Tukwila Fire Department TURWILA FIRE DEPARTMENT. FINAL APPROVAL FORM Project Name OL L -- 7 -621 q Address / e S / S/ I Retain current inspection schedule \,/ Needs shift inspection \ Approved without correction notice Approved with correction notice issued J Sprinklers: 7o011 Fire Alarm: / 9R, "21? FA /�-7 S l:v F � ///,./.4e., Hood & Duct: LI. ' / Halon: Monitor: P c. wiekii c. 7/e • JAi Pre -Fire: /i Permits: p*' t Permit No. /.. �7 C • / C) Date FINALAPP.FRM T.F.D. Form F.P. 85 !"w4.:. rwee:'V. usi.YC?' °try x?rs John W. Rants, Mayor Thomas P. Keefe, Fire Chief Suite # / / Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 5754404 • Fax (206) 575-4439 e. PACIFIC TESTING LABORATORIES Nir December 5, 1997 Certificate No. 712- 71540. Dave Larson CITY OF TUKWILA Building Department 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Subject: Project Name Project Address Permit No. Outback Restaurant 16 - _ . - nter Pkwy. • We have completed the requested special •inspections on the subject project. Our final report, dated October 14, 1997, is numbered CR 255215. WORK REQUIRED WORK INSPECTED Reinforced concrete (cast in place) Reinforced concrete (cast in place) To the best of our knowledge, all work inspected conformed to approved plans, specifications, UBC, and related codes, and /or verbal or written instructions from the Engineer of Record. Reviewed by: John F. Vicente, E.I.T., Project Manager, Seattle Construction Services Sincerely, cc: Mark Drewry EVERGREEN STATE RESTAURANT CORPORATION 3650 131st Avenue SE, Suite 520 Bellevue, WA 98006 A Division of f Irlh e; T B° ; ao, . : c o 9 •1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMC NT Professional Services Industries • 3257 16th Avenue, West • Seattle, WA 98119 • Phone 206/282-0666 • Fax 206/282 -0710 LODERG ROOFING Fax : 206-775-7887 Dec 10 '97 10:51 P.01 LOBERG ROOFING TChieviikfiAsthr-ad FROM • ATTN:_alaus: PHONE: (425)775-2276. FAX: 2Lo) FAX: (425)775-7887' DATE: pievrbek/o. COMMENTS:' TOTAL PAGES INCLUDING THIS ONE: k •■■■■11P LODERG ROOFING' Fax • 206-775-7887 LOBERG ROOFING Coi< P.O. Box 6386 • Lynnwood, WA 98036 • (425 ) 7754216 �MD • commtacnon, Inc. u.. LOS!RC1O1 December 10, 1997 Tobb Construction Co., Inc. Attn: Dave Larson Sr. Building Inspector 3016 NE Blakeley Street Seattle, WA 98105 • RE: Outback Steakhouse • 16510 South Center Parkway Tukwila, WA 98188 Permit #D97-0180 Dear Mr. Larson: Dec 10 '97 10:51 P.02 The roof on the above mentioned project is a UL, Class B Rated System. See enclosed information. Please call me at (425)775-2276 fyou have any questions regarding this project. Sincerely, Rytth Siinthons Vice President RS/ma _ LOBERG ROOFING FIRESTONE. SPECIFICATION 3=407,3(m. ui.cv.. B Type File 89516 (N)• —I —1 — 1— I — — —I —I -1 — "I--1 I — — I— I— I— I— I— 1 I— 1— I— 1 — I — WasutL —De'ek — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — 1 — I 1 — r — I — I — I — I — 1 — 1— 1- — 1— 1— r— 1— I— I— I— 1- 1— l - 1-- 1- 1- 1 —I —I —I — 1— 1— 1— 1— 1— 1— 1 I- 1 • 1— I— I— I— I— I— I— I • 1 1 — 1 — 1— 1— 1— 1— 1- 1— '1- 1 - -1 -1 — 1— 1— 1— 1— 1— I — I— 1— 1— 1— 1 — 1— 1— 1— I— 1- 1— 1— 1— I— 1— 1 — 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 — l ' . I — I — I — 1 — I - 1 - 1 - 1 — I — I — This specification 31- 102.3(#) is applicable for the Firestone APP -160 membrane applied to the following substrate: Decks: Wood Slope: 1/4',1/2'" 1'max. Insulation: A. Wood Fiberboard 40 • B. Paulite sr C. Isocyanurats D. Fiberglass • F. Gypsum • Base Sheet: U.L. labeled G2 • Fasteners: A. I.C.B.O.or F.M. approved Wig: A. Karnak Type 1I ® 1 gal. per 100 B. Karnak Type III ® 1.5 gal. psi 100 1/2' min. 1/2' min. 1' . min. 11/16' min. 1/2' min Fax : 206 -775 -7887 Dec 10 '97 10:51 P.03 NEW ROOFING INSULATED ASSEMBLY .: .I p.tk brand.. peadasss s m be w al or ublastioss rosy ss ary 10 lose oc siki 11111311111111111 .os Ars U.L. ads/ owl dope. May esquire multipls. lamest inriniso sosritisati.r or double ban alma alosabiisa r rose ILL. mirk. PloTti: flw iiluo ration. ors to saws a estrosi Mo/snreliog, Ala basis slw.ts of tbo modal apeman. Ms slops tsatkaioa is tot tits firs mini only. The application procedure, general requirements and other information in the Firestone APP sp- ecification manual are an integral part of this specification. 1. Faatan the recommended insulation over the property pcepatod roof deck following insulation maaufactaarer's apecifleatione. 2. Fasten a layer of bus sheet over immolation board using the approved screws, plane and fastening pattern. 3. Ioetalk the membrane onto the surface using the stan- dard installation method. Side laps shall be a. minimum of 3' and end laps a minimum of 6'. 4. Complete all Hashing details. S. Prepare membrane followingthe coating manufacturer's specifications. ioaa. 6. Spread coating uniformly over the roof sues faire awing jam direction. Cate. should be taken. not to over work the coating. 9/90 Project: yt r ,t �M 17f Type of inspection: Address: Ito ci 0 . PKW Date called: 1 2 17 Special instructions: Date wanted: 1,--) i z_ig7 a.m. P.M. Requester: Phone No.: INSP ION N O. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION • 6300. Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes.' COMMENTS: INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with pern Inspector: [Receipt No.: ' Date: Date: PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. tZ I $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Yi • hi 3 • t„ Project: Type of inspection: Address: Date called:' `. Special instructions: Date wanted: a.m.. p.m. Requester: -.. Phone No.: INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION -. 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: 1115 ��c /� U lkt�Z Q w Q S `/'�'j(//�• 1.4.4, TLI pc J- s II/1QI c2 sx.c p 5,4 c 0 - 4 4 CCU Tye 2- • l b INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit 97 •dr PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670. Corrections required prior to approval. Y Date: 1 1 ! Jq 7 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Inspector: Receipt No.: Date: 1� Project: Type of inspection: D Address: r I(�'4�j SC e Date called: Date wanted: II / am. P.m. Special instructions: Requester: / DO W6 Phone No.: •rn.a:'rkcyt.4 INSPECTION. RECORD Retain a copy with permi INSPECT c '' `O. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDINGDIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Inspector: Approved per applicable codes. f Receipt No.: r dti.k' "•i .r`L+e; c':�a;� • C O 7018A— PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670' Corrections required prior to approval. tl / 'r/ s Act -E Sal cps V-,w 1 r `'`' Co N N 2ah 0-0m • S -ca c_05 0 A-Lf te L I�l� COMMENTS: i. Date: I . J $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Call to schedule reinspection. Date: Project: Ou +11nrk C SteaKhouse. Type of inspection: S,t), Yritiork. nPs +t n►1C_ Address: t( 10 &,uf cenfelr rkw Date called: 10-27- 0 Special instructions: Date wanted: U y 2 $,, ,, . p.m. Requester: bar MC Ca Ida Phone No.. ( 3o b_600 INSPECTION NO`S CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 ,._ INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit Approved per applicable codes. PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: pi* 6,471.4-04 ka - 2 IMN It y , • a k c' /l.izs.e. 6 u. Inspector: N u Date: to12f [1 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: .i4 COMMENTS: Type of inspection: 5 SS I/319? (3-41 o 4 ( c aT Sov Address: I iv (.i� S .C Pew Y \ I r l eJ C. it ,1 Akc aQ^, . p j 0i1.0 GLA SS L). L &A J`2A Q I(vA.) , Date wanted: 1(/ 1`q7 ,/ I.. vt ` /.: Requester: 1). AN / (b() (lob S __PLA9.___A . iv' C-Q (r ).ti _Q�Q___ Phone No.: __6,,tazid S6 t, (a 0 • Na� 0J AAAA t 5 i 1,,-0.,,,J4, c.Q 5-el �� -0 - tv eaT kt\L q VI N L1 0 e 1/4dL Q0 6 - -e ti .Lv�Q k C-041/b 0 I wAAA • .,; fA.I (<, l Project: so. ,at STe+AKkOk Type of inspection: 5 SS Address: I iv (.i� S .C Pew Y Date called: i()/3? � Special instructions: Date wanted: 1(/ 1`q7 a.m. (Pp? Requester: 1). AN / (b() (lob S Phone No.: Inspector: I Receipt No.: Approved per applicable codes. ti INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO' CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date: PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to'approval. Date: V57 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to insp ction, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. 41 ' tLAi OW; • Inspector: PERMIT NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECT' O. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Address: i(PsY3 se er , y Special instructions: Project: ' Type of inspection: Date called: Date wanted: a.m. c. -2 ) / -i p.m. Requester: OA-AN. / - ' oo CoieV Phone No.: Approved per applicable codes. I I (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: c f) it 2— at? 12) o ( ^a4) eLaksh to -ci/41, h( S A1-0_ -r c l� l c � - -reek '.0 I I Receipt No.: Date: c i7 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: Project: 0 ^ r k ` 1 � / r 1` � Type of inspection: SD Address: 1(0 5 5. (. ,Qr_Wy Date called: IC) /2-+ /q7 Special instructions: Date wanted: 1 207 a.m. p.m: Requester: I DO 0 Phone No.: INSPECTIOI UNO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 tt.> Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: ( CAT �r Inspector: Receipt No.: I I INSPECTION RECORD D^ v jb0 Retain a copy with perm PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. X21 �7 fig# SST v-J/ 321 F c 1\1-p C�i�1 tiJ t cva,5 wt a CSC Q 3 k ) . N c_8 t ,.4". ..ti Date: Date: ) I $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. • , } 0 Project: Vu __A9( Address: Special instructions: V. 5c 1 Inspector: Receipt No.; App oved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD,. Retain a copy with perm INSPEC'RON NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Type of inspection: Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: N . C '2; t Q L ,S1 C 3 6 (4 Date: Date: bq7 -o)z sD PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspbctio ; fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. • !.i Project ^ . �;. Reecr Type of inspection: 54 Address: Date called: lo iY�I S ecial instructions: Sp Date wanted: .�O J G'� �? a.m.: p.m.: Requester: Phone No.: 0..•:r. :.�.:... CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 1 INSPECTION NO. Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with per .1)97--(196 PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 7 L4-(29 cst ca Ski-L04) Loo, �:b P rIe .. -47) POf SkIA Sul rha,t 4Acii Inspector: J I 1 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. 'Receipt No.: Date: I , ` Date: Project: Oui bask S +ea K hou pe of inspection: Ty se - E hrtt5+ bl ocK Address: 1l0 53 50 (r� J tl� ate called: ' O— 13 _ ql Special instructions: \ . Date wanted: t arm 10 13 -cii p.m: Requester: K e I t y Phone No.: 5 O 75 14&c INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 COMMENTS: Inspector: Date: FT $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. [Receipt No.: Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with per PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670. Corrections required prior to approva Date: �;t INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA.BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Project: s Address: ko.S Sz Special instructions: TypeinSpection: r rt Date called: /v /q / jn 7 Date wanted: Requester: Phone No.: 57s � ()Lcs , / Approved per applicable codes. Inspector: INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with per, Date: D97 -0 PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670' Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: L-47 , SSA 5 out 70- -4 Itim4 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt_No.: Date: Project: Type of inspection: 55 5 Address: e/e 1 '1 Date called: 1 2.... ? . Date wanted: a , ap. I 1,7 ( P.m. Special instructions: Requester: � 7UOR Cct Phone No.: INSPECTION. RECORD Retain: a copy with permit ° UT °0 INSPECTION iNw CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: Inspector: fl I Date: Corrections required prior to approval: hlt �f G u/ g 0 ' �..�. K� r (' PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 $42,00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. L R0t No.: Date: • Y' Project: " ? Type of -- t lion: S53 Address: (Data' called: " IV t I /q7 Special instructions: Date wanted: I I R .2g7 1 a.m. p.m. Requester: ' paw. /(op S Phone No.: tagENINEWSMOCIPVIMEIIMIlattstaaturaswernemssauslucvab INSPECTION- RECORD Retain a gopywith permit INSPECTION NO. "1 - , CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION' 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukvkfla,3WA 981 Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: , 2./q-7 ot W►.14 . 9,0,c. 24zy Oki Cflad Oulift,/g Wiam Inspector 6, ki Date: / /1 ri $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection, Receipt No.: Date: PERMIT NO. • (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 0 Cowl A...0- tAllk.4 c cWI-1 W 12) I . M.wNslle 9-4. Q.N� /lJ.-< -■ CA - --f-t p 4 v `„ ' - i a C, Ai 1 -di "D (, ciatAJ S c-o,,t r% 4 t el ue .___s24._Y < 11 £- % ril-t o. '.P.L._ CM Ca. Date wanted: 1-r--eil--". nI 4 .9-x a SLQ.- P G 4;1 54 4 NA . , �` , � n , `n' c,, J 17_ a 36 N 0 J2 i r L�JL 3 Jam' �-c cLr - KIT t t$ n . ___. :a■ . _ Cr. Ill... ILLlr r., i►ar..L 4 C 6 ` tt.s..,,. C) C�4.. , s Project: I Type of inspection 5S " Address: Date called: t i f(ij Special instructions: Date wanted: ( /r"?2 p.m: Requester: D t - 7 Phone No.: AI Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT NO, (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. Inspector: 6 Date: it I ‘24i7 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: COMMENTS: Type of inspection: r Address: Date called: ' 1/77 4 I/0119 -: AIM T Q`' (ONAP-4 U/N �.Oai, • S 4(o 54 r k)�YL`PAA��J) d{ i 1yt✓1 f ` • cwJ Lt t (CAN- '. C Y-A'■1•••• cs,,J No '` t i7 q 3o,.*60,-Jici=i):\ e c J DNS 0..,wd( . j ! ct cr t 6.-.12A4A, 1 (1 47/1 N wJ( 0-'6,...,4 ((u . c ii p U / V. L' ll. i ... A- L., I Project: 0 6 96 A Type of inspection: r Address: Date called: ' 1/77 Special instructions: Date wanted: f t(�0� a.m. P.m. Requester: Phone No.: Approved per applicable codes. Inspector: f14'..LTmLil6d4 R'1 . �.ZL Z r.N.ritral: o� '7M M1anrikterza INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date: Date: c7-ol8a 1t PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. El $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: COMMENTS: 11/110? — A4-0 Le__ CcTilt-0 1 LA.-■ %Al 5 - .2 •- 1 .. r um, 1:BEE5m. ■,,..,e, (,.9.. wc)40,,,_ .i,,,y_, ,os) fA., 5 -f A ,,,,,J, 7,,ILT,„. -ci,t, _e.,,,,),L, Ci ,D / 1 Aft6c4-1t.. kJ c )6(. 44 4J z: -n) I 50,,IL ka, 0-afik. tifritcl pEA_As -),' Iv k cm. gv iv 4 )5 tAii . - 11A; ,, ) scA wo-i 4iii 4_3" . i' f5 00IT soab Project: 26.4, Type of inspection: Date called: V 5 a.m. p.m. Address: Special instructions: Date wanted: IliNir Requester: 0-4, / I 00 t.4.- 5 Phone No.: graCSWEI2=StlatMOVZZOM21137 INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. 211PMV5t31000110307161014MICtINI Corrections required prior to approval. Inspector: e ., \I [ I Receipt No.: a Date: Date: PERMIT NO. (206) 431-3670 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inpectr6n, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Project: oc d _ _ p� - ll� ���I C�'�ti�- Type of inspection: 5D • Address: 16535 St. fl y D ate called: 11/( Special instructions: Date wanted: u r� -7 1� /� /1 / a.m. p.m. Requester: Phone No.: a y;`.- i' t.. tri , ;'.,h`'''ik`'J...r';, f i,'+�.` ' 1: a+ T, S!! RiaY: i* 2.`' k?; s�tc� ..t.'�t:41:4ar•},;.�- •Y.�ae :! INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. .. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION . 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, 'Tukwila, WA 9818£0:, Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: L c!t No.: au. i..h. PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. 11 47 tto F CO") 3 to 0) o (- -tv (s v , Date: `[ k 1 + 19) $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Inspector: 6 Date: ; ! - COMMENTS: /057V____/ � 1I lam- l l9 iV ' /t/+L 04 / / 4 1 c,4 7'`/e4 dax I»i-i■ ilk Crc,c, n, : rj) tt s cr, 4 7 —A- j7 k/ ' s67 - 1 -i E 7 buct;.i.d 6 h 4 /6&j( 71A-0 9_ _ - .r • l r tUA S 6416114. t f A y h - t 4774 vn ci n- ex C t,- 4. - i-tv— A , ? r>U-'1/4 r� .a4 C • . a.m. p.m: Requester: l `` gy, p �O t 5 a Project: ( n ' �.- ('fit Type of inspection: C 7 Address: Date called: li tif9 Special instructions: Date wanted: g (5 /t) a.m. p.m: Requester: l `` gy, p �O t 5 Phone No.: INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. A . CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter. Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 I I Approved per applicable codes. Inspector: 6 Date: Corrections required prior to approval. 1 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. [Receit No.: Date: (206) 431 - 3670. COMMENTS: Type of inspection: S S S rF 11/6/f7 73C ko ) aF c nit-t141/4C / ' oM AT g4)-1 Poc 7v tlx -c: e- ,D E -,A Flo/ 6( r or ,e,,zIc / Q X . (i)w 72) Date wanted: ((I /519) p.m. 7t /t�F w i4 Ault ,l /l/� 7 dos s /-t:zz) . y , r T �14 'l /A -(-. i:/e--.9 m- ,)r,-re,e 73 r Min a f /) co N izfe.44) to l!l Air Di/ loo lv «ck r/ Act ot t J f ��K 6 F ( � 1/a1 L4- hw) 7A G, Do) )74 14:- OF AA Z). 7t4/S u,u Ids Au iiitviti`earvid ivy At Ai ‘G W • I L r W a •* gel 1 A / At. , -4 � , » r Ir/ 4) /; l 6e / ..., sid, Project: 0 � t 6 L IC... Type of inspection: S S S rF Address: Date called: I 1''/g7 Special instructions: Date wanted: ((I /519) p.m. Requester: r� 00.9._ JOOl k ( Phone No.: tl• INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 n Approved per applicable codes. PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. Inspector: 7j Date: ik l(5-A7 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: . • COMMENTS: Type of inspection: SS S ,11,E /k C.0N� P B S oM,-� c sc ,,, �= Address: � G tl.. : ..,? m t4 oc. in 1 / < 4 ./ ' r4 b ■ Date wanted: ill1'1cI'1 a.m. p.m:. i _.. .r...._' _ 1A A F I . • • ,f - • Phone No.: Ib '." --(.„ u. S (nl -Qij 11' W D vat i.J -.1( G . U iid.�ttv --J 0± 2c S C ' VKwy a A.A■. L_ . C r r /4�' (1,(0 i 1 1 I) c c) cliv,j M rA-w,A (lr,a J`f nvs, Irv,,.., .+ .o., r ,......, , Project: 0 . .,L 6 Type of inspection: SS S Address: Date called: l Special instructions: Date wanted: ill1'1cI'1 a.m. p.m:. Requester: Phone No.: Inspector: INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. CU INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit Date: � PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule relnspection. Receipt No.: Date: Project: ac t. , , A, , %�� Type of inspection: C-SS Address: Date called: II/ ? Special instructions: Date wanted: 11114efg7 , a.m. p.m. Requester: ONA, :CIL- r. Phone No.: l n Approved per applicable codes. IraFtra0M200Sarcerreleveu INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 I (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: L iii\4 L*s we S SS Tv Inspector: eiL) Date: ( J i s i $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. ' Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: COMMENTS: Type of inspection: 5 s 5 igh 7 Pi u-it6i,t c ock I k .....l. . ■ / ■ L.: ' Date wanted: am. 1 I 1 C i - / P f Requester: r , VCUA if DO vik- S -to c4 51/4tb S S (44 , ) , b 01 , Situvi As ■etcdt cA-2)\14. 50,A4JL /2-40,.. W{1 PAC iv C.44A± 5.1 , 4 i f■L, A...4.EL 11 in - 1 - 6 t.I.Q...tni ON cls.. CS vul 6.) LI . CI AA:" t o I cbt.c. , 4 ,. P roject: eltrp Type of inspection: 5 s 5 Address: Date called: i 0 t 1 0 li /97 Special instructions: Date wanted: am. 1 I 1 C i - / P f Requester: r , VCUA if DO vik- S Phone No.: • INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. I 1 Inspector: Ll Date: PERMIT NO. (206) 431-3670 Corrections required prior to approval. uI I 9/ $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: 6 COMMENTS: 11/ 0 04-0.61+ A03 - lo'N , Type of inspection: SSc 6-a65S 5, I pr Lt.. .1..,1 , a___.4.6. A ,. ry of ciam . i ltokt -t____vAekr ii- 02 .. I .4 . ! . .1411 I . Special instructions: &At 1141illA ‘ A.99 Lift_ yw24\4- 4 . steh ffrbi--12 tru44 o-4 poi i--6 Requester: Oa dKii D 19 (Ak9 s .!..! _- A.L._6...,..... , . Ut • i_.1 -Pa-LIAAP ( ktkt e L c-04AA a e 111 fte,w-ovJ 4 st_AQ 14-64 r (1..loal v,:)(TIA/Afx s n/04 Q oc pet 4 r ui o.t..e of c cuA...4/..to .e... TA-6w\ /L4 um . 4 V t ARSfiNg . \ _ TAA teL L-0\i'Ao,k a ft Project: ou lt z e . Type of inspection: SSc Address: Date called: , / 2xy _ t I q 7 Special instructions: / . Date wanted: / I a.m. 11 p--) 1 17 / p.m. Requester: Oa dKii D 19 (Ak9 s Phone No.: ....' INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit Ccp-0120 PERMIT NO. (206) 431-3670 Corrections required prior to approval. Inspector: Date: t 112)07 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED.' Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspectlon. Receipt No.: Date: tf; ^ A m . hYN a .. ,. ... r,. .... ..a. ..Ski . at zazatiiigra . i.. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Project: ©r ` n _ k Address: Special instructions: Type of inspection: F / 14 Date called: Date wanted: ' � / �� a.m. U� "f p.m. Requester: Phone No.: Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 11 JAt1(t) PI.&L1 - 4 6 010 Lk) 4,t t c p-443 fi- 4 Ow 7 wk rk,u3 p 141 afL t-i-^ IS wtv, dk. o k , 5) P rt.P. +. L Sew•, eZ II 2,101co Inspector: 8 ` ) Date: PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: CORRECTION NOTICE The following items are found to be deficient and not in accordance with the approved plans CITY OF TUKWILA '' PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 431 -3674' PERMIT NO. oUr3ik - I D 9 - 0/6k) DATE: / V/97 TIME: TIME: or City standards: JOB ADDRESS: /(05 /d $6 ,Qiewy IP uti /fry ) 7li 7et.. of e" wEic `fit P- lnl et= Tw,6F U Sew,E'� 16/6 ' do ANT df C4,-,j ef7c /2 4flt cry l O / u.C7` A SS (Thy,- .v7'FC ,472/-'4",./.4y WAS /Z4?Ui,26:0 70/,5 (1' &) 'nl r S/ 2 ' !_vn/.tWeT i . /4l (J-77A -0 /1 ,4 ,p//Lric, 411 .r w r 2 M/Oh MD& /2 6 4 l 4 / - N 11- Ote f o f , ) of ex/ ,57 d l i7/ce4 / Cvw6 7�l/ Ulcf a1'` )41/014 Tat- rt4I 7 / # ,w /i ,U�al r t4 4 mi -- /�T if G400 iL iM�n� o h ,�- lli4,u/rWet iTvp rwzl b tts cilLE6 • SIGNED: �( `� /! VL "GC.yt'ltAc/%- i PUBLIC WORKS•INSPECTOR . l 'li.:i.:. 'ii::t�•�'' - ;ir���� n a�..�'.+1�i'..'ii.i: i.�. <:.�tl.;.. iN Project: o ` Type of inspection: 95. Address: Date called: l ( ?� 7 Special instructions: Date wanted: a.m. 11, ).c �(7 p.m. Requester: D VP.I1 DDcnk - S Phone No.: INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. Inspector: PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: tp319-2 4u2-64-e LKtp, 2, c.otu Date: —/ ? n $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Project: Type of inspection: s n V Address: Date called: �;� Iil Special instructions: Date wanted: ( /2,_ ? a.m. p.m. Requester: 1, b / IDQ kicky Phone No.: INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 f Inspector: lI Approved per applicable codes. Receipt No.: INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 11 Asmm-ov&A 2 4 77 AP Vi ( Dot ti1/4k ry2 Se- U.) N Ct> r. Date: 114c /q-) $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Date: ii • I Project: © A Type of inspection C A. s Address: Date called: � f IZw C 1? Special instructions: Date wanted: �7 it/ - c a.m. P.m. l Requester: �{n l S Phone No.: ,..a+.voacmraurabmand=r.oamonracn wanwuextaszmar.ia tms INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. Inspector:.....:. I Date: 1C PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: -11/7-1?? c (-1 Pty trt Ib eft Qu I I : 21 Avn . 1 T L unitk ()EC ST NA CZ It: 3ZfkvIA $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt, No.: Date: ja COMMENTS: Type of inspection: :....L , gr , ,, �,c it) Lo tai c.,} -f 5, ,O/(._ r A— , /D 'q) -` c E LA-6, e 11 /Utz 7 f• ____ 5 .474 ce...c a.m. p.m: Requester: F . 9 (Uf) / • "c.f /law T{57T ,o 1 X. y 11 vt FA/ �' ,L'k Uhi- , d u Type of inspection: :....L , Address: Date called: / S . - / 7 Special instructions: Date wanted: , / 41 a.m. p.m: Requester: F . 9 GvtzsT Phone No.: INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. I Inspector: I $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to' inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: .... } .. ,,,. 1%4: AN. Aa3' 7.1'VA3i.7f . ULt SIP; INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit Date: Date: Corrections required prior to approval. Project: o Type of inspection: y r � M Address: / 5•/0 J C ^ G G _ / I t � Date called: i r t y y S ecial instructions: P Date wanted: + / V/ 7-07 a.m. p.m. Requester: At '- /' © � -/I GN 5 / { Phone No.: INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: lI INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit ■.till C4Sti4n e Aa i,ry, Corrections required prior to approval. I t/ / c- W '-Q t.S Inspector: Date: 11 / 2 0 $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. I Receipt No.: Date: - Project: o . q Type of inspection: c L 14 Address: /! O st i,A7 Date called: 11 -7-4' �� Special instruL ns. Date wanted: j Iy �7 a.m. P.m. Requester: .�. s tzi Phone No.: $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspectlon. I Receipt No.: Date: 1/ ? + +: Date: INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. [ ] Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit 8ft ("otAl al (206) 431 -3670 COMMENTS: /1/2 IM t r r P cv/ 6,6X y WlATYP ,1 � , 7 TKO Yowl. 43004 4/ 6.V. TL) p.", v i2 of / c l - pi vtll'c: Tv ?4�vA t sl (�J y (k s t d fLo --- 7 �i 14)orC_ ,Gc /ow, CX . 12.0 I) fJ w 1 /316 y 7' / 6(/ o /C — ex - 7iir rzfrt (r /u1.o(..&, ///p . ..��� mc.. i e � 1 l � Special instructions: qa t f Q , U , co ofect• `• T pe of in pec�'on: ; � 5 C'\ IrL/,1 - .,C?L ms ,,,, . p D I c l t o� ed: ..��� mc.. i e � 1 l � Special instructions: qa t wanted: Q , U , co p.m. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. I Inspector: L ct No.: $42.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspe' ion, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Corrections required prior to approval. Date: Date: ,...;... :-t-i-Dsc `•" PERMIT NO, (206) 431 -3670 • rl 4:c Kx likaszz.kak;.:1,74 VA.G."e: ''3Xii344+F57: "0 17311.135th Avenue NE, A -500 Woodinville, WA 98072 (425) 486-1669 • Fax 481 -2510 September 5, 1997 P gV'kti ;E Mr. Rick Lentz Merrick Lentz Architects 1800 - 136th Place NE, Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Dear Rick: an . ... NELSON- COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS Snohomish County (425) 337 -1669 Wenatchee /Chelan (509) 784.2756 RECEIVED CITY OF TUt4NIlA SEP 0 81997 PERMIT CENTER RECEIVED Supplemental Geotechnical Letter ,�� �/ SEP 0 Outback Steakhouse ( G'L O So c _ { �- �' tl 1 ' Tukwila, Washington TUKWILA NCA File No. 197997 PUBLIC WORKS INTRODUCTION This letter presents our review of the planned sewer line for the proposed Outback Steakhouse. The site is located in the west parking lot of the DoubleTree Hotel at 16500 Southcenter Parkway, in the city of Tukwila, Washington. You have requested that we review existing geotechnical information and prepare a letter providing our opinions on the adequacy of the planned casing. We have previously written a geotechnical report for the Outback Steakhouse, dated March 19, 1997. You have provided us with faxed copies of the site plan and profile of the sewer line and a copy of letters from Rittenhouse -Zeman & Associates, Inc, (RZA) dated June 10, 1988 and July 29, 1988. The plan is to install an 80- foot -long by 24- inch - diameter steel casing under Southcenter Parkway. This casing will be used to house a 6 -inch PVC sewer line extending through the casing and connecting to the existing sewer system in the middle of the road. The top of the steel casing will be 6 to 8 feet below the ground surface, as shown on the plans. We understand that the casing will be Vz- inch -thick with a yield strength of at least 45,000 pounds per square inch (psi). The new Outback Steakhouse will be located to the east of the Southcenter Parkway and sewer alignment. Our geotechnical report described the site to be overlain by a heterogeneous mixture of loose to medium dense, brown to blue -gray, silt, sandy silt and silty fine sand with clay and gravel. These soils bq1.OLO Supplement Geotechnical Letter Outback Steakhouse September 5, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 2 ::::Y.'A= '•ai:'.h:YJeC�Cl4b2M1t Ch=+nv > *vv. „n e.e... �..,.,....,n.- ,..., »aen .. <:n nn....'v Mir rt+.v.�rN extend to a depth of about 17 feet in the restaurant area, and have been interpreted to be fill. Below the fill, we encountered a medium dense, dark gray to black, very fine sand to very fine sand with silt. The sand is interpreted to be alluvial deposits that range from the bottom of the fill to about 27 feet in depth. The ground water elevation encountered in our explorations were 17 feet below the surface on February 17, 1997. This reported water table seems somewhat deep and is expected to be closer to the surface. The RZA reports address the installation of an open- trench sewer line under Southcenter Parkway from Strander Boulevard to Minkler Road. The subsurface conditions near the pipe elevation consist of very loose to medium dense sand with varying silt content and medium stiff sandy silt. Some peat was encountered below the elevation of the sewer line, but is expected south of the planned sewer alignment. Ground water levels range from 3 to 7 feet below the ground surface. The RZA reports interpreted the subsurface conditions to be fill or alluvial deposits near the elevation of the sewer line. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS We expect loose to medium dense fill or alluvial deposits will be encountered within the sewer alignment. The road crossings will require trenchless methods to install the sewer line as requested by City of Tukwila. Trenchless methods can include pipe jacking or borings. These methods will require a pit to be constructed outside of the roadway. Depending on the location, the pit may extend below the ground water level and will require some type of shoring and/or dewatering. The high ground water and sand could cause "running" conditions and may present a problem. There are a number of ways the potential "running" ground conditions can be handled. This is typically a construction problem handled by the contractor, based on the actual soil and ground water conditions and his methods. It is important to notify the potential contractors before bid time, so that if these conditions are encountered, the contractor is prepared to deal with them. If a high ground water table were encountered, we would expect that some dewatering may be required to complete a successful pipe jacking installation. We have evaluated the vertical deflection of the planned pipe section using the Modified Iowa Formula or Spangler's Equation. To use this equation, we have assumed a soil modules of elasticity of 400 psi, a maximum vertical deflection of 5 percent, and 18,000 pounds per axle truckload. It is our opinion that the pipe is adequately sized to support the planned loads based on the above assumptions and the site parameters. The casing parameters are also above minimum standards established by American Railway Engineering Association Specifications. NELSON COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. c tri.; 3�i' i:. v7 tti. tAs.'. i:+ i» tl�t.;'. x.,<! i„ 1?,. J. A< 5+; 6? !`x+,�. %,.:; .r * Giza: Yt��t;; wn entna!; rr+. t wr.. at- ��rny. anrs+ rur.+..... wwx« a. sr rr•.. e+ e m rx: r• � � w.. e.+ a+.. r � n+»•.•,• x.,•...,. w+.r.., r ........ »w.... • Supplement Geotechnical Letter Outback Steakhouse September 5, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 3 It is our opinion the pipe casing thickness will be controlled by the pipe jacking stresses: In other words, if the contractor has a sufficient casing strength to withstand installation, then the casing should support the vertical loads after it is installed. The contractor should provide an adequately sized casing to satisfy the stresses that may develop during installation. The most import construction comment is that the contractor should be cognizant of the amount of material removed as the casing is advanced. The amount of yardage withdrawn from the pipe should be equal to the amount displaced with the casing. This will allow your contractor to calculate if loss of ground conditions is occurring around the casing. Loss of ground can create voids on the peripheral of the casing may cause settlement of the overlying roadway and utilities. If loss of ground occurs, grouting measures should be considered to fill these voids. USE OF THIS LETTER We have prepared this letter for Mr. Rick Lentz of Merrick Lentz Architects, for use in planning and design of this project. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding and estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions. The scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations • are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions. We recommend that project planning include contingencies in budget and schedule, should areas be found with conditions that vary from those described in this report. We should be retained to provide on -site consultation if conditions encountered during installation are different than those described in this letter. It is our opinion full time observation is not needed unless conditions are different or as directed by the City of Tukwila. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget for our services, we have strived to take care that our work has been completed in accordance with generally accepted practices followed in this area at the time this report was prepared. No other conditions, expressed or implied, should be understood. NELSON- COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. FETPIRES / 1G / 97 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions concerning this report . . . . or if we can provide additional services, please call. , • - Rick B. Powell, PE Project Engineer RBP:CPC:kmn Three Copies Submitted NELSON-COUVRETTE. & ASSOCIATES, INC. • -. • ••■••• • RECEIVED • CITY OF TUKWILA • JUN 09 1997 PERMIT CENTER NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS , AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS Dctl I SO _ GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FOR MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECTS NELSON- COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 17311.135th Avenue NE, A -500 Woodinville, WA 98072 (206) 486.1669 • Fax 481.2510 March 19, 1997 Rick Lentz Merrick Lentz Architects 1800 - 136th Place NE, Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse Tukwila, Washington NCA File No. 197997 ` ( ,, 6td tei`10 Dear Rick: CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS Snohomish County (206) 337.1669 WenatcheelChelan (509) 784.2756 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the planned Outback Steakhouse. The site is located in the west parking lot of the DoubleTree Hotel at 16500 Southcenter Parkway, in the city of Tukwila, Washington. You have requested that we prepare this report to provide geotechnical recommendations for the foundations of the new building. You have provided us a faxed copy of the site showing the building footprint. We have also obtained a geotechnical report prepared for the DoubleTree Hotel, by Roger Lowe Associates Inc., dated October 20, 1978. The planned building will be an approximately 6,000 square foot, single -story restaurant, located in front of the DoubleTree Hotel. We are not aware of the planned slab elevation, but expect that it will be 1 or 2 feet above the parking lot elevation. The structure will be a wood - framed building without masonry veneers. Entry porches will be on the north and west sides of the building. You expect typical foundation loading conditions. The existing hotel structure is supported by a deep pile system. Our investigation found on the order of 17 feet of moderately compact fill. We discussed potential settlements and foundation systems. You have indicated that "floating" the structure is preferred over the use of pile foundations. ( Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 2 SCOPE The purpose of this study is to evaluate soil conditions in the area of the planned building to provide recommendations for the building foundations. Specifically, our scope of services includes the following: 1,. Review the available previous reports for the DoubleTree properties. 2. Explore the subsurface conditions with two geotechnical borings. 3. Perform laboratory analyses of samples obtained in the borings. 4. Provide recommendation for foundation design. 5. Present our findings, conclusions and recommendations in a written report. SITE CONDITIONS Surface Conditions We observed the conditions around the existing pile supported hotel building to evaluate if the non -pile supported areas around the building have settled relative to the pile supported foundation. We did not observe significant settlement around the building. Minor amounts of movement were observed between the pile supported concrete sidewalks and those concrete sidewalks that were not pile supported. This movement was less than 0.5 inch, where observed. The site in the area of the planned structure is currently being used as a parking lot for the hotel. The parking lot has an average slope of about 2 percent downward toward the east. We observed some minor cracks and very shallow depression areas. Some of these depression areas were collecting water and forming puddles in the drainage path areas. The pavement section has been covered with a seal coat in the past. It is difficult to determine if the asphalt is settling, or if it placed on poor quality sub -base. The grading for the entire parking lot seems unordinary, and has drainage grates at high spots in the parking lot. However, this appears to be due to the original grading, rather than settlement based on the overall slope and shape of the parking lot surface. Geology The geologic units mapped for this area are shown on the Geologic Map of the Seattle and Vicinity, King County. Washington, by Howard H. Waldron, Bruce A. Liesch, Donal R. Mullineaux, and Dwight R. Crandell (U.S.G.S., 1961). The surface soils are classified as alluvial deposits. The Roger Lowe Associates Inc. geotechnical report describes the native soils at depth to be alternating shoreline and NELSON- COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 3 swamp deposits, above glacial till. Our explorations encountered similar materials, but we did not extend into the glacial till. Subsurface Conditions Subsurface conditions were explored at the site by drilling two borings using a hallow -stem auger drill rig. The borings were Located on the east and west sides of the building footprint to obtain soil samples for analyses. Samples in the borings were obtained using a 2.5 -inch, inside diameter, "California" ringed sampler. The sampler was driven beyond the bottom of the auger to obtain relatively undisturbed samples, using a 140 -pound hammer dropped 30 inches. A 2 -inch, outside diameter, Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler was used in the native soils in Boring 2 (B -2) for liquefaction evaluation. The borings were located in the field by a geologist with this firm, who classified the soils encountered and maintained logs of the explorations. The boring locations are shown on Figure 2. A detailed explanation of the field exploration program and the exploration logs are presented in Appendix A. The site is overlain by a heterogeneous mixture of loose to medium dense, brown to blue -gray, silt, sandy silt and silty fine sand with clay and gravel. These soils extend to a depth of about 17 feet, and have been interpreted to be fill. The fill was identified in the boring logs for the hotel, therefore, it has been in place for more than twenty years. Below the fill, we encountered a medium dense, dark gray to black, very fine sand to very fine sand with silt. The sand is interpreted to be alluvial deposits that range from the bottom of the fill to about 27 feet in depth. Below the sand, we encountered a medium stiff to stiff, dark gray to brown silt with some fine sand seams. The silt deposit is approximately 12.5- to 25.0 -feet- thick and appears to pinch out towards the west or the valley wall. Underlying the silt deposit and to the bottom of our explorations, we encountered a dark gray to black, medium dense to very dense, fine to medium sand with silt, clam shells and gravel. This type of soil appears to be some type of shoreline material. The top of the sand with shell layer was encountered in B-1 and B -2 from 52 and 42 feet below the surface, respectively. The previous geotechnical report for the hotel shows that a glacial till material underlies the sand with shells layer. We did not extend to these soils. Hydrologic Conditions We encountered ground water at about 17.5 feet in both of the borings. This water is expected to represent a regional ground water table. The ground water levels will fluctuate some during the year. NELSON - COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 4 DISCUSSION ON SETTLEMENT POTENTIAL OF THE EXISTING FILL We did not observe significant distress in the parking lot area, and noticeable settlement is not occurring between the surrounding surface features and the pile supported hotel structure. The existing fill appears to be somewhat compact in its existing condition, with minor amounts of surface settlement. These observations, along with our drilling information, indicate that the fill is not significantly consolidating. For the type of structure planned, we do not expect significant settlement contribution from the underlying native soils. Our concern with the existing fill is that it is difficult to confidently characterize its engineering properties. Even if the two borings were representative of the range of fill characteristics across the site, potential settlement could not be estimated with standard geotechnical procedures. Instead, it would be estimated empirically, based on experience with past performance of other uncontrolled fills and existing conditions. For this case, total settlement could be estimated empirically, but it would not be known how much of the total potential settlement had already taken place since the time that the fill was initially placed. If the two borings were not representative of the existing fill, additional unknowns would be realized. These include: • the areal extent of fill • the range of total depths of fill • the material type and consistency • depth to, and thickness of, compressible zones • possible existence of voids, debris or highly organic zones • possible existence of well compacted fill, or dense native soil Accordingly, it is difficult for us to estimate an amount of maximum potential settlement because of the many unknowns that exist. Normally, when we evaluate settlement potential of uncontrolled fill, we provide a reasonable estimate based on our experience with other fills. A common fill situation used for such estimates is uncompacted soil placed behind retaining or subsurface walls. We have observed consolidation of these fills of up to 1 to 2 inches for 8- foot -high walls. Extrapolating this settlement performance relationship to conditions observed in the two borings at your site, we estimated that up to 2 to 5 inches of settlement could occur with, or without foundation loads. However, the fill on site seems more compact than fill observed to settle at the 2 -inch value. If the borings were not representative, greater or lesser settlements could be experienced. Our evaluation of the consistency of the borings is NELSON - COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. _ Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 5 based on our observation of the differential settlements of the surrounding features. We do recognize that since the fill has been in place for a number of years, some of the settlement is expected to have already occurred. The risk of settlement could be reduced by excavating some of the existing fill and replacing it with structural fill. For preliminary evaluation of foundation support alternatives, we estimate that for overexcavation of existing fill to a depth of about 2 to 4 feet and replacement with structural fill, a "realistic" design settlement for this site would be on the order of about 1 to 2 inches. There is a potential that this settlement estimate could be exceeded. The need to overexcavate the fill 3 to 4 feet could be evaluated during construction, based on the near - surface soil conditions observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General It is our opinion that the building can be constructed with conventional shallow spread foundations, provided the owner assumes the risk of settlement. The settlements can be reduced by overexcavating the existing one footing width or 2 feet below the footing, whichever is greater, and replacing the excavated soil with a imported granular structural fill. This will create a compacted fill pad under the building. The process will remove some of the compressible soil, and provide a compacted mat that will promote more uniform (lower differential) settlement. We estimate the potential settlements to be on the order of 1 to 2 inches with this overexcavation alternative, based on the thickness, age of the fill and the consistency found in our borings. We would expect that the impact of this settlement could be reduced by constructing a suitably reinforced foundation system, that would spread out differential movement within the structure. It is our opinion that it would be best to support the entire structure, including slabs, on this foundation. If the risk of settlement can not be accepted, then the foundation should be supported by a deep foundation system. We expect that piles will be on the order of 50 to 60 feet in depth. Design recommendations for a pile foundation system could be provided, if needed. Support of slabs -on -grade (if used) will be dependent to a certain extent on settlement tolerance. The least amount of settlement would be associated with the removal of a large portion of the underlying fill and replacement with structural fill. The highest risk of settlement would be to place the slabs on the existing grade. In our opinion, a good intermediate solution would be to remove at least 2 feet of fill in the underlying slab areas and compact the resulting surface to 90 percent of the maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557). A layer of structural fill would be placed on the compacted surface. The excavated fill NELSON - COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 6 soils could be reused, provided they are of suitable moisture content to be compacted to acceptable standards. If these soils are to be reused, we recommend the stockpiles be covered with plastic to protect it from rainfall. One option to be considered is using a heavily reinforced foundation system that supports both building structure and slab loads. Foundations, prepared as recommended in this report, could be excavated leaving the existing pavement in place. The future capillary break could be placed on the asphalt, thus having a cleaner site. This would be especially advantageous during wet season construction. The Puget Sound region is classified as a Zone 3 by the Uniform Building Code. Seismic considerations for this type of site include liquefaction potential and attenuation of ground motions by soft soil deposits. The liquefaction potential is highest for loose sand and silty sand with a high ground water table. The effects of a liquefaction event could result into settlement of the structure. A detailed liquefaction analysis has not been conducted, however, because of the medium dense, sandy soils and the fill cap across the site, we expect the liquefaction potential to be low to moderate. On a nearly level site such as this, liquefaction damage is related to settlements. Placing the structure on foundations reinforced to withstand potential settlement of the fill will, in effect, also reduce the impact of liquefaction, if it were to occur. Site Preparation and Grading The near - surface fill soils are considered moderately to highly moisture sensitive, and will be difficult, if not impossible to work with when wet. If construction takes placed during wetter months, additional cost will be incurred from the need of importing rock spalls and select fill. Footings should be prepared in accordance with our recommendations in the Foundations sub - section of this report. We expect that import material such as "pit run" will be needed in the overexcavation areas below all footings. If site conditions are wet, a layer of 2- to 4 -inch rock spalls may be needed on the exposed subgrade. Using the slab preparation of removing 2 feet of existing fill, we recommend that the bottom of the excavation be compacted to a firm condition, and to 90 percent of its maximum dry density. Areas that are observed to weave under the compaction equipment should be repaired, as determined necessary. Most likely, repairs would consist of removal and replacement with a suitable material. If site conditions are wet, the most suitable material would be 2- to 4 -inch rock spalls or another similar product. The use of existing fill in the slab areas will depend on the quality of the material and if the soil can be kept dry. NELSON - COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 7 This could be better evaluated at the time of construction. Even during the summer, some drying may be necessary. This fill would need to be removed from the building area if it is too wet for compaction. If the heavily reinforced floating foundation is used and the slabs are designed to span across the footings, specific slab preparation will not be necessary. Structural Fill General: All fill that is placed beneath buildings, pavements or other settlement sensitive features should be placed as structural fill. Structural fill, by definition, is placed in accordance with prescribed methods and standards, and is monitored by an experienced geotechnical professional or soils technician. Field monitoring procedures would include the performance of a representative number of in -place density tests to document the attainment of the desired degree of relative compaction. Materials: Imported structural fill should consist of a good quality, free draining granular soil, free of organics and other deleterious material, and should be well graded to a maximum size of about 3 inches. Imported all weather fill should contain no more than about 5 percent fines (soil finer than a U.S. No. 200 sieve), based on that fraction passing the U.S. No. 4 sieve. It may be more appropriate to use a gravel or rock spall backfiil. These types of materials do not require compaction, and can be placed in wet environments. The near - surface fill soils contain a significant amount of fine- grained particles, and are considered highly moisture sensitive. The use of these soils as structural fill should be limited to extended periods of dry weather. Even during periods of dry weather, some discing for drying and watering may be necessary to achieve the desired moisture content. We recommend that these soils be considered for fill only if construction takes place during the drier summer months. Fill Placement: Following subgrade preparation, placement of the structural fill may proceed. All backfilling should be accomplished in 8- to 10- inch -thick uniform lifts. Each lift should be spread evenly and be thoroughly compacted prior to placement of subsequent lifts. All structural fill underlying building areas should be compacted to at least 95 percent of its maximum dry density. Maximum dry density in this report refers to that density as determined by the ASTM D 1557 compaction test procedure. The moisture content of the soils to be compacted should be within about 2 percent of optimum, so that a readily compactable condition exists. It may be necessary to overexcavate and NELSON- COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 8 remove wet soils in cases where drying to a compactable condition is not feasible. Because of the total depth of fill on site and the relative thickness of the structural fill, some relaxation of compaction may be appropriate, based on observations by the geotechnical engineer during construction. If the solution of removing 2 feet of the underlying fill is used, it is our opinion that the compaction criteria could be reduced to 90 percent in slab areas without significantly impacting the performance of the slabs. We recommend that all slabs that are supported on these conditions have some minimal reinforcement. Foundations Based on our discussion, we consider that it is feasible to support the 'structure on shallow spread footings. These footings should be founded on a zone of imported, granular structural fill which replaces a portion of the existing fill. The zone of structural fill should extend a minimum of one footing width or 2 feet below the bottom of the footing, whichever is greater. The excavation should extend outside of the footings a minimum of 0.5 foot for every 1.0 foot of the depth of the overexcavation. For example, the width of the trench for an overexcavation of 2 feet should extend a minimum of 1 foot on each side of the footings. Footing areas should be free of ponded water and sloughed or water loosened soils, prior to placement of footing concrete. We recommend an allowable design soil bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) for footings that are constructed as described above. All footings should be sized according to the anticipated wall or column loads, and the above soil bearing values. Minimum footing widths of 18 and 24 inches are recommended for all continuous and isolated footings, respectively. A one -third increase in the above allowable bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term transitory wind or seismic loads. For the recommended site preparation, fill placement and foundation support, we estimate that a realistic potential settlement for this site would be on the order of about 1 to 2 inches. It is possible that this estimated settlement value could be exceeded. Although observation of the site features indicates that this is a low probability. Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between the foundation and subgrade, or the passive earth pressure acting on the below -grade foundation. For the latter, the foundation must be placed "neat" NELSON - COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 9 against the undisturbed soil, or backfilled with a clean, free draining, compacted structural fill. We recommend that a lateral soil pressure of 200 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) equivalent fluid density be used. An allowable coefficient of friction between footings and the subgrade of 0.35 may be used. These values include a factor of safety of 1.5. Slabs - on - Grade All slab areas should be constructed on subgrade prepared as described previously. Where subgrade fill exists that is not compacted to the 90 percent criteria, additional reinforcing should be used to resist differential settlement. Where moisture control is important, we recommend that all floor slabs be underlain by 6 inches of free draining sand or gravel, for use as a capillary break. We recommend that the capillary break be hydraulically connected to the footing drain, to allow free drainage from under the slab. A suitable vapor barrier, such as heavy plastic sheeting, should be placed over the sand or gravel. The vapor barrier is very important, and a conscious effort should be made to place it correctly. A 2- inch -thick sand blanket may be used to cover the vapor barrier to aid in curing of the concrete. The capillary break and vapor barriers should be used regardless if the slab is supported on grade or designed to span between foundations. Drainage We recommend that runoff from impervious surfaces such as roofs, driveway and access roadways be collected and routed to an appropriate storm water discharge system. It is also recommended that perimeter footing drains be installed at the base of exterior footings for moisture control. The ground surface adjacent to the building should be sloped to divert surface water away from the structure. If footing drains are incorporated into the design, they should consist of a 4- inch - diameter, perforated plastic pipe located adjacent to the footing. The pipe should be embedded in 12 inches of washed rock or pea gravel. The washed rock should be covered with a suitable geotextile fabric before the excavation is backfilled. The roof drains should be tightlined separate of the footing drains, until the tightline is a minimum of 1 foot vertically down gradient from the footing drains. USE OF THIS REPORT We have prepared this report for Mr. Rick Lentz of Merrick Lentz Architects, for use in planning and design of this project. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for their NELSON - COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Geotechnical Engineering Report Outback Steakhouse March 19, 1997 NCA File No. 197997 Page 10 bidding and estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions, and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions. The scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for consideration in design. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions. We recommend that project planning include contingencies in budget and schedule, should areas be found with conditions that vary from those described in this report. We should be retained to provide monitoring and consultation services during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork and foundation installation activities comply with contract plans and our recommendations. As part of our services, we would evaluate conditions at the time of construction and provide recommendations specific to those conditions. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget for our services, we have strived to take care that our work has been completed in accordance with generally accepted practices followed in this area at the time this report was prepared. No other conditions, expressed or implied, should be understood. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions concerning this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. Sincerely, NELSON- COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Rick B. Powell, PE Project Engineer DJB:RBP:CPC:dfr Three Figures One Appendix Three Copies Submitted Charles P. Couvrette, PE Principal Engineer NELSON - COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, 'INC. N NELSON-COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULT7NG GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND EWIRONAIENTAL SCIENTISTS VICINITY MAP FILE NO. Outback 197997 I FIGURE 1 I DATE FEBRUARY 1997 PARKING a B - STEAKHOUSE PARKING NELSON- COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS FILE NO. Outback B -1 Reference: Site Plan was created from an untitled, undated drawing provided by the owner. 197997 Site Plan LEGEND NUMBER AND APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SOIL BORING 13 NUMBER AND APPROXIMA LOCATION OF BORING #1 FROM ROGER LOWE ASSOC. INC. REPORT I FIGURE DATE March 1997 wilfungzivrwrcar ^ 20 18 16 14 12 B -2 Building Location Fill Sand Silt to Silty Sand Assumed ground surface datum of 200 feet. B -1 -- NELSON- COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS Sand with Shells Cross Section A -A' (Not to Scale Horizontal, 1"=20' Vertical) Silty Sand FILE NO. Hotel (on piles) Outback 197997 B -1 Roger Lowe Assoc. (1978) Silty Sand (Glacial Till) l FIGURE DATE 3 March 1997 Or.tl.g71t91i.. W/ , APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS AND LABORATORY TESTING The soil conditions were evaluated by drilling two borings. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the Site Plan. A geologist from this firm was on site during the explorations. The geologist • located the explorations approximately, and maintained logs of the soils encountered. The soils were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, a copy of which is presented as Figure A-1. Representative soil samples were collected for further review and classification. The boring logs are shown in Figures A-2 through A-5. We have also included in this appendix boring B-1 from the Roger Lowe Associates report. The borings were drilled using a hollow stem auger drill rig.. Samples in Boring 1 (B-1) and the top 14 feet of B-2 were obtained using a 3-inch, outside diameter, split spoon (California type) sampler. Representative, relatively undisturbed ring samples were obtained for further evaluation and testing in our laboratory. The samples at depth in B-2 were obtained using a 2-inch, outside diameter, split spoon sampler. Both samplers were driven using a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. The sampler was driven 18 inches when possible. The blow count to drive the sampler the last ,12 inches is shown on the boring logs. The 2-inch sampler with the above driving criteria is called the Standard Penetration Test (SPT). The purpose of our laboratory testing program is to establish the engineering properties of the subsurface soils. The testing included moisture content and dry density tests. The results are shown on the boring logs. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DMSIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME COARSE - GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON NO. 200 SIEVE GRAVEL MARE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL - GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GP POORLY GRADED GRAVEL GRAVEL WITH FINES GM SILTY GRAVEL GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION PASSES NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN SAND SW WELL GRADED SAND FINE TO COARSE SAND SP POORLY - GRADED SAND SAND WITH FINES SM SILTY SAND SC CLAYEY SEND FINE - GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% PASSES NO.200 SIEVE SILT AND CLAY LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 50% INORGANIC ML SILT CL CLAY ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY LIQUID LIMIT 50% OR MORE . INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS 1) Field classification Is based on visual examination of soil in general Dry- Absence of moisture, dusty, dry accordance with ASTM D 2488 -83. to the touch Moist- Damp, but no visible water 2) Soil classification using laboratory tests Is based on ASTM D 2487 -83. Wet - Visible free water or saturated, 3) Descriptions of soil density or usually soil Is obtained from consistency are based on below water table interpretation of blowcount data, visual appearance of soils, and/or test data. ' NELSON- COWRETTE & ASSOCIATES, CONSULTING GEOTEC,INICAL ENGINEERS, - �ANO INC. GEOLOGISTS SCIENTISTS UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FIGURE A -1 ENVIRONMENTAL B -1 Surface Elevation: Asphalt (2.5 ") Heterogenous mixture of brown to blue -gray silt, sand silt, and silty fine sand with clay and gravel (loose to dense or stiff to hard, moist) (Fill) • "15a7k gray very line sand with at ancrtrace roots (medium dense, wet) —No Recovery— Dark gray to brown silt with fine sand seams and organics (stiff, wet) U vi MUSM SP MUSP NELSON- COWRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS. GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS II a IL I II a a w 1 -- Penetration Resistance (140 lb. weight, 30" drop) • Blows per foot 5 10 50 100 me -11.1% DD=91.3 mc20.8% 5 D0 :110 mc15.0% 10 00119 mcl.5% 2/17/97 15 mc= 27.1 % — DD=98.4 20 — me =53% DD =70.0 25 30 maw • On Rock LEGEND I 2" O.D. split spoon sample * Liquid limit 31 3" O.D. split spoon sample + Plastic limit Moisture content ( %) DD Dry density (Ib/ft3) Impervious seal P Sample pushed Water level TV Torvane reading, tons/ft Piezometer tip PP Pocket penetrometer reading, tons/ft NOTE: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types and the transition may be gradual. Outback I FIGURE I A -2 FILE NO. 197997 DATE February 1997 Dratunipt97997 cot B-1 (cont.) Surface Elevation: Dark gray to brown silt with fine sand seams and organics (medium stiff, wet) —No Recovery— Dark gray to black, fine to medium sand with silt, clam shells, gravel, and trace silt seams (medium dense to very dense, wet) —No Recovery— Boring was completed at 63.5 feet on 2/17/97 Ground water was enountered at 17.5 feet LEGEND 1 2" O.D. split spoon sample IC 3" O.D. split spoon sample * Liquid limit + Plastic limit U vi ML/SP S M NELSON- COWREITE & ASSOCIATES, INC CONSULTING GEOTECHNJCAL ENGINEERS GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS W CZ to 0 3 0 FILE NO. 35 40 1' of heave 50 55 60 2.5' of heave mc-49% — DD 77.3 45-- Moisture content ( %) Impervious seal Water level Plezometer tip NOTE: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types and the transition may be Outback 197997 Penetration t (140 Ib. weight, • Blows pert. 5 10 gradual. DATE DD Dry density (Iblft P Sample pushed TV Torvane reading tons/ft PP Pocket penetrorr reading, tons/ft FIGURE A -3 February 1 aanwagif B -2 Surface Elevation: Asphalt (2.5 ") Heterogenous mixture of brown to blue -gray silty fine sand with clay and gravel (loose to dense or stiff to hard, moist) (F111) Dark gray to black very fine sand with silt and trace organics (loose to medium dense, wet) Dark gray silt interbedded with organics (medium stiff to stiff, wet) SM /ML SP -SM ML co p 0. o < o.. co�3 w II IC IC IC IMO i L I NELSON- COWRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS. GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS 1 Penetration Resistance (140 Ib. weight, 30" drop) • Blows per foot 5 10 50 100 n 24.4% 5 - - Disturbed - Disturbed mt 16.2% DN96.7 Q 4/17197 mc:327% 2.5' of Heave 10 --- !Results from 3" O.D. Sampler — 15 20 25 omme MON 30 --- mc:57% — 0 i f Results from SPT Sampler • • • • LEGEND 1 2" O.D. split spoon sample * Liquid limit ( Dash Line) a 3" O.D. split spoon sample + Plastic limit ( Solid Line) me Moisture content ( %) DD Dry density (Ibffb) Impervious seal P Sample pushed Water level TV Torvane reading, tons/ft Pfezometer tip PP Pocket penetrometer reading, tons/ft NOTE: The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types and the transition may be gradual. Outback I FIGURE A-4 FILE NO. 197997 DATE February 1997 W I C4, t1 AVV,5,4,1 B -2 (cont.) Surface Elevation: 0 0) Dark gray silt interbedded with organics (medium stiff to stiff, wet) Gray fine to coarse sand with gravel, silt, clam shells, and cobbles (dense to very dense, wet) Boring was completed at 53.3 feet on 2/17/97 where there was refusal on cobbles Ground water was encountered at 17.5 feet ML SP -SM L__ w 0 i Standard Penetration Resistance ii n p Z I•- (140 Ib. weight, 30" drop) 0 Q IL • Blows per foot co 0 0 I II 11 NELSON- COUVRETTE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHN1CAL ENGINEERS. GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS 1 5 10 50 100 40 - Disturbed - 45 -- ft 35 --- _ 50 55 60 • ` • • 1 50(6") t 50(3 ") ill LEGEND 1 2" O.D. split spoon sample * Liquid limit 31 3" O.D. split spoon sample + Plastic limit me Moisture content ( %) DD Dry density (Ibift3) Impervious seal P Sample pushed Water level TV Torvane reading, tonsltt Piezometer tip PP Pocket penetrometer reading, tons/ft NOTE; The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types and the transition may be gradual. Outback I FIGURE A -5 FILE NO. 197997 I DATE February 1997 DrM"p■197997 Wr , Ooubletree Lodge DEPTH DRY BLOWS "IN MOISTURE DENSITY PER F (F ET 1 15 20 25 30 35 40 BORING ONE ELEVATION 36 (LOCAL DATUM) GRAPHIC LOG ROGER LOWE ASSOCIATES INC. • t • October 2n_ 147A SOIL DESCRIPTION LOG OF EXPLORATION Plate A - GRAY TH ANEOUS ET) N UNDER- MATERIAL TRACE H LAYERS , MOIST) I miffi DI SOD AT 3 INCHES HETEROGQCUS MIXTURE OF BROWN AND 22.1 100 28 1111) SILT, SANDY SILT ANO SILTY SAND WI GRAVEL, ORGANIC MATTER AND MISCELL DEBRIS (SOFT TO DENSE) (MOIST TO W (FILL) 29.7 94 9 11111 15.8 126 40 IIIIJ OCCASIONAL SEEPAGE FROM PERCHED GROUNDWATER 29 APPROXIMIMATE PIEZOMETRIC HEAD I 16.4 116 36 11111 LYING SAND LAYERS • 10.5 130 46 11111 OCCASIONAL LAYERS OF VERY DENSE 17.9 • 93 38 11111 SM DARK GRAY VERY FINE SILTY SAND WITI OF ORGANIC MATTER (MEDIUM DENSE, WI 34.6 87 16 11111 • ,01. DARK BROWN ORGANIC SILT TO SILT WI' 99.0 44 14 Hui ML OF SILTY PEAT (SOFT TO MEDIUM ST I FI OCCASIONAL SILT ZONE 44.5 76 11 11111 f` � , Ooubletree Lodge DEPTH DRY BLOWS "IN MOISTURE DENSITY PER F (F ET 1 15 20 25 30 35 40 BORING ONE ELEVATION 36 (LOCAL DATUM) GRAPHIC LOG ROGER LOWE ASSOCIATES INC. • t • October 2n_ 147A SOIL DESCRIPTION LOG OF EXPLORATION Plate A - GRAY TH ANEOUS ET) N UNDER- MATERIAL TRACE H LAYERS , MOIST) • .Doubletree Lodge October 20, 1918 OE IN BLOWS M MOISTURE DENSITY PER GRAPHIC FEET CONTENT (PCF) FOOT LOG 40 45 50- 55 60-- 65 - 70- 75 80 52.6 26.9 21.6 15.2 25.4 70 96 89 125 101 OCRING ONE CONTINUED 11 1110 • 38 11111 35 11111 84 11111 100/5" 11111 136 11111 SM SP SW ML SOIL DESCRIPTION GRADES WITH SOME CLAY GRAY SAND TO SILTY SAND WITH SHELLS AND OCCASIONAL ORGANIC MATTER (MEDIUM DENSE TO DENSE, WET) GRAY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH TRACE OF SILT AND SHELLS (DENSE, WET) GRAOES WITH GRAVEL GRAY FINE TO COARSE SAND WITH SOME SILT AND GRAVEL (VERY DENSE, WET) GRAY SANDY SILT TO SILT WITH OCCASIONAL GRAVEL (VERY STIFF. MOIST) ROGER LOWE ASSOCIATES INC. 1 LOG OF EXPLORATION Plate A - DEPTH ____ DRY BLOWS MOISTURE DENSITY PER FEET CONTENT (PCF) FOOT ao ROGER LOWE ASSOCIATES INC. I LOG OF EXPLORATION (9 CA T ° 1 - C 5.7g H O E RZA •, :o r esivi RITTENHOUSE-ZEMAN & ASSOCIATES, liVC. Geotechnical & Hydrogen logical Consultants Bellevue. Mishingum 98005 1400 140,11 Avenue N. E. it a ‘Zt4ilekiA:46r- 0061 746-8020 10'June 1988 C City of Tukwila c/o Fujiki & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 965 22617 - 76th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention: Mr. Don Williams Subject: Geotechnical Considerations Sewer Extension Southcenter Parkway L.I.D. 32 Tukwila, Washington Gentlemen: A -i This letter presents the results of a review of our files to characterize the subsurface condition that may be encountered and to provide considerations of the geotechnical aspects of the sewer installation for the above referenced project. This study was verbally authorized by Mr. Don Williams of Fujiki Associates, Inc. on 7 June 1988. We understand the proposed project is to consist of the installation of a sanitary sewer line under Southcenter Parkway from just south of Strander Boulevard at the north end extending to Minkler Road'at the south end, a distance of approximately 1200 feet. The depth of the sewer line will range from approximately 7 feet on the north end to approximately 11 feet on the south end. We understand that the proposed line will be installed under one traffic lane and a second lane will be closed to accommodate the contractor's operation. W -5718 Fujiki & Associates, Inc. /City of Tukwila W -5718 10 June 1988 Page 2 The general geological history of the Southcenter Parkway area includes near - surface, hard and dense, glacially consolidated soils underlying the north end of the South Center Parkway resulting from large cuts made during the construction of Interstate 5 to the west. These hard and dense soils dips steeply down to the south and east. To the south, these hard and dense soils are overlain by alluvial soils consisting of interbedded sands, silts and organic layers. These soils are typically loose and soft and are often saturated as a result of a near - surface ground water table. Our files include borings from the recent addition to Nordstroms and the original construction of the J. C. Penney store. Nordstroms is at least partially founded on near - surface competent soils, while J. C. Penney is founded on piles extending to depths on the order of 80 feet in the northeast corner to 180 feet in the southeast corner. This indicates the steeply dipping hard and dense stratum that is present a great depth in the area. Our experience also includes the Double Tree hotel complex on the east side of the street just south of Strander Boulevard. This development is founded on a pile foundation extending through the soft and loose' alluvial soils. Also,we have recent explorations performed for the retail store buildings planned for development by Bob Schofield. Our boring for this development, (our job number W -5437) located nearest the street, encountered loose alluvial sand to a depth of approximately 30 feet. In summary, although there is a small possibility that competent near - surface soil may exist at the extreme north margin of the project, at pipe invert elevation, we expect that the entire alignment will largely encounter loose, soft, alluvial soils consisting of interbedded sand, silt, and possibly peat stringers, lenses and layers. Also, a near - surface ground water table should be expected along the alignment. In our opinion, excavation of the utility trench in the saturated, alluvial soils will be possible but difficult. The contractor should be prepared to control the A -2 Fujiki & Associates, Inc. /City of Tukwila W -5718 10 June 1988 Page 3 stability of the trench walls consisting of loose and soft soils with potentially rapid ground water seepage into the trench excavation. Some temporary, localized dewatering may be necessary to reduce ground water seepage and increase the trench wall stability. Any dewatering efforts carried out by the contractor should be maintained for as a minimal length of time, as possible to limit the areas affected by the dewatering. Any peat stringers, lenses or layers located within the dewatered area will settle drastically upon dewatering, thereby effecting nearby ground surfaces, utilities or buildings not founded on piles. In addition to dewatering to increase the trench wall stability, a trench box should be used to protect the workers and provide a minor amount of additional wall support, if movement occurs. Backfilling of the trench after the pipe has been installed should be immediate in a manner described subsequently. We estimate that trench widths may be on the order of 3 feet at the bottom, widening to 6 feet at the top. However, if ground water seepage is not adequately controlled, the trench may widen due to wall instability. If the subgrade at the pipe elevation consists of peat or organic silt, this material should be overexcavated until non - organic material is encountered or to a maximum depth determined in the field at the time of construction. Any overexcavation below the pipe should be backfilled with bedding gravel. We expect that the material excavated, will consist of silty sand, sandy silt and various organic soils in a saturated condition. We recommend that these saturated, silty soils not be used for backfill of the trench as they cannot be consistently compacted properly. The suitability of soils used for structural fill depends primarily on the soil particle size gradation and moisture contents of the material, when it is placed. As the amount of fines (that portion passing the U.S. No. 200 sieve) increases, the soil becomes increasingly sensitive to small changes in moisture content and adequate compaction becomes more difficult or impossible to achieve'. Any soil containing more than about 5 percent fines by weight, such as the site soils, cannot be consistently compacted to a firm, non - yielding condition when the moisture content is more than 2 percent above optimum. A -3 • �.' � �:{;" f' :.: �s dl' UArxrw , :!wkvxnA,,,.w�.o.....,..... as construction progresses. A -4 Fujiki & Associates, Inc. /City of Tukwila W -5718 10 June 1988 Page 4 We recommend that the utility trench be backfilled with imported, clean, granular soil, such as a "Class A" pit run. The imported, granular fill should contain no more than 5 percent by weight passing the U.S. No. 200 standard sieve when measured against the minus No. 4 sieve fraction. Soil used for structural fill should have a maximum particle size on the order of 6 inches and be free of organics, roots, debris or any other deleterious material. All fill placed within the utility trench for backfill, should be placed in accordance with the recommendations herein for structural fill. Structural fill should be placed in loose lifts not exceeding 8 inches in thickness. However, as an exception, we recommend that the first lift above the pipe be placed in a 2 -foot thickness above the top of the pipe to protect the pipe upon subsequent compaction. Individual lifts should be compacted so that a density of at least 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM:D 1557) is achieved, to within the upper 2 feet. We recommend that the last 2 feet below final subgrade elevation be compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density. We recommend that a representative of our firm be present during placement of structural fill to observe the work and perform a representative number of in- place density tests. In this way, the adequacy of the backfill may be evaluated The upper several feet below the roadway may consist of imported fill material used for the original construction of the Southcenter Parkway. It is possible that this material may consist of silty, gravelly sand or roadway ballast. If this material can be economically separated out during the excavation, it may possible to reuse this material for backfill of the trench above any zone of seepage. As described above, this material will likely contain at least some silt and, therefore, will be moisture - sensitive. Some drying of the soil may be required, if it is several percent over its optimum moisture content for proper compaction. Fujiki & Associates, Inc. /City of Tukwila 10 June 1988 Although no traffic studies or pavement design analysis has been performed as part of this study, we were asked to provide comments regarding the pavement replacement. We recommend that the new pavement is at least as thick as the pavement removed. We understand that asphalt- treated base (ATB) may be used for a temporary (one to two months) roadway surface. If ATB is to be used, we recommend an equivalency be used where 1 inch - of existing Class B asphalt equals 1.25 inches of new ATB. We recommend a minimum thickness of new Class B asphalt pavement wearing- course of 3 inches, in accordance with Asphalt Institute guidelines. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this letter are based on previous explorations performed in the area by us. .No site - specific explorations were performed for this study. The integrity and the performance of the utility depends on proper site preparation and construction procedures. Rittenhouse -Zeman & Associates, Inc. would be available to provide construction observation and geotechnical engineering services during earthwork and pavement construction phases of the project. If 'variations in the subsurface conditions are observed at that time from the conditions assumed, we would be able to provide additional geotechnical recommendations to minimize delays as the project develops. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully submitted, RITTENHOUSE -ZEMAN &.ASSOCIATES, INC. ln Mark J. Amr ejn, P.E. Project Eng, er A - s W -5718 Page 5 RZA Fifirv4 RITTENHOUSE- ZEMAN & ASSOCIATES. INC. Geotechnical & Hydrogcologica! Consultants /400 Nlhh .lrrnne N. E. � Renew. IIitshinttnn 98005 w� i.0A17468020 Gentlemen: 29' July 1988 City of Tukwila c/o Fujiki & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 965 22617 - 76th Avenue West Edmonds, Washington 98020 Attention: Mr. Don Williams Subject: Limited Geotechnical Engineering Study Sewer Extension Southcenter Parkway L.I.D. 32 Tukwila, Washington This letter report presents the results of our subsurface exploration and limited geotechnical engineering study conducted for the above referenced project. In addition to the field.explorations, the scope of work for this study was limited to recommendations regarding the sewer installation. This letter report is an addendum to our original letter addressing the geotechnical considerations of the project dated 10 June 1988. Verbal authorization to proceed with this study was granted by Mr. Don Williams of Fujiki & Associates, Inc. on 13 July 1988. This letter report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the City of Tukwila, Fujiki & Associates, Inc. and their agents, for specific application to this project in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. A - � W- 5718 -1 Fujiki & Associates, Inc. /City of Tukwila L.I.D 32 29 July 1988 PROJECT DESCRIPTION We understand the proposed project is to consist of the installation of a sanitary sewer line under Southcenter Parkway from just south of Strander Boulevard at the north end, extending to Minkler Road at the south end, a distance of approximately 1800 feet. A side sewer extension of approximately 300 feet will also be installed towards the Toys 'R Us store from manhole #8. The depth of the sewer line will range from approximately 7 feet on the north end to approximately 11 feet on the south end. We understand that the proposed line will be installed under one traffic lane and a second lane will be closed to accommodate the contractor's operation. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS In our original letter, we anticipated that the subsurface conditions likely to be encountered would consist of several feet of imported fill over alluvial soils consisting of loose and soft, saturated, sand and silt with potentially interbedded organic peat. For this phase of the study, two backhoe- excavated test pits were dug by the City of Tukwila and observed by us, and four hollow -stem auger borings were drilled in the roadway by a local drilling company under subcontract to our firm. The approximate exploration stations are indicated on the attached boring or test pit logs. The exploration logs are presented at the end of this letter report. The relative soil densities indicated on the exploration logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions observed during the exploration. The borings consisted of advancing a 4 -inch inside diameter, hollow -stem auger with a truck - mounted drill rig. During the drilling process, samples were obtained at 2 -1/2 foot depth intervals. The borings were continuously observed and logged by a geotechnical engineering from our firm. Disturbed samples were obtained by using a Standard Penetration Test Procedure as described in ASTM:D 1586. This test and sampling method consisted of driving a standard 2 -inch outside diameter split - barrel sampler a distance of 18 inches into the soil with a 140 -pound hammer free - falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows for each 6 -inch interval A -' W- 5718 -1 Page 2 "+.;KJ:) >.W • Fujiki & Associates, Inc. /City of Tukwila L.I.D 32 29 July 1988 W- 5718 -1 Page 3 is recorded. The number of blows required to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is considered the Standard Penetration Resistance ( "N ") or blow- count. The blow - count is presented graphically on the boring logs in this appendix. The resistance, or "N "- value, provides a measure of the relative density of granular soils or the relative consistency of cohesive soils. Our borings conducted for this study encountered 6 inches of asphalt pavement over gravelly, fine to medium sand, interpreted to be the road base fill. This road base fill ranged in thickness from 2 -1/2 to 6 -1/2 feet, but was generally on the order of 3 feet thickness. We anticipate that although some areas of deeper road base fill were encountered, this material 3 -1/2 feet or more below the pavement surface may be siltier and wetter and would be difficult to use as backfill. Deeper material which contains only some silt (i.e. less than 5 percent) and is within several points of its optimum moisture content may be attempted to be used as "structural fill" as described in our original letter. Below the fill, our borings and the test pit observed revealed alluvial soils consisting of very loose to medium dense, silty, fine sand and medium stiff, fine sandy silt with organic peat stringers and lenses. A layer of very soft, fiberous peat was encountered below a depth of 12 feet in boring B -1 at STA 15 +78. This peat layer was below the proposed sewer invert elevation. Proposed sewer invert elevations are shown on the boring logs and 'the invert elevation at all of our exploration locations are located within these alluvial soils. Ground water was encountered in our borings at depths ranging from 3 -1/2 to 7 feet below their existing pavement elevation. The proposed sewer invert elevation at our boring locations extends below the ground water table. In our opinion, based on our previous experience in the area and the coloration and weathering of the samples obtained in our borings, the level of the ground water table fluctuates little over the course of the year. However, it should be noted that fluctuations Fujiki & Associates, Inc. /City of Tukwila L.I.D 32 29 July 1988 in the ground water table may occur due to on -site and off -site utilization (such as dewatering), and to a lesser degree, season, precipitation and other factors. CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS In summary, our borings generally revealed 6 inches of asphalt pavement over 3 feet of potentially usable, road base fill which may be re -used as trench backfill. Some deeper areas of usable road base fill may also be encountered. Below the fill, alluvial soils were encountered consisting of very loose to medium dense, silty, fine sand and medium stiff, fine, sandy silt with peat stringers and lenses and occasional peat layers. The proposed sewer invert elevation will be located within these alluvial soils below the existing ground water table. The upper fill soils can be expected to stand open during the utility trench excavation relatively well provided, the underlying soils stand open. We anticipate that temporary cuts into the underlying alluvial medium stiff silts will also stand open for a short time. However, we anticipate that excavations into the silty, fine sand below the water table will become rapidly unstable due to seepage into the trench and that caving of the trench walls is highly likely. Any peat layers below the water table are capable of carrying very large volumes of water and therefore should be considered potentially unstable. Some temporary, localized dewatering may be necessary to reduce ground water seepage in these areas and increase the trench wall stability. Any dewatering efforts carried out by the contractor, including pumping from the trench in the areas of rapid seepage into the trench, should be maintained for as minimal length of time as possible, to limit the areas affected by lowering of the ground water table. Any peat stringers, lenses or layers located within the dewatered area will settle rapidly and drastically upon dewatering, thereby effecting nearby ground surfaces, utilities or buildings not founded on piles. As mentioned in our previous letter, a trench box should be used to protect the workers and provide a minor amount of additional wall support, if movement occurs. The trench should be backfilled in accordance with our recommendations provided in our original letter for "structural fill ". To reiterate, we recommend that the A W- 5718 -1 Page 4 ,: «Eiift:F 4Y. Y .^Ya"Ak.tMti'i.YtpC:'i+.- nrear*, Ae.r w... .... +.. a.. e..+..... ei,. c.... ...ws.✓...we...n�.+..w..w.�...w Fujiki & Associates, Inc. /City of Tukwila L.I.D 32 29 July 1988 Arlo W- 5718 -1 Page 5 utility trench backfill for the zone of alluvial soil spoils be replaced by imported, clean, granular soil, such as a "Class A" pit -run. The upper 3 -foot thickness of existing road base and fill may be separated and saved for re -use as utility trench backfill provided it is at a proper moisture content during placement. Some deeper areas of existing road base sand fill may also be encountered along the alignment during excavation and could be stockpiled for re -use. All structural fill should be compacted such that a density of at least 90 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM:D 1557) is achieved to within 2 feet of the finished subgrade elevation. We recommend that the upper 2 feet below final subgrade elevation be compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor maximum dry density. We recommend that a representative of our firm be present during placement of the structural fill to observe the work and perform a representative number of in -place density tests. In this way, the adequacy of the backfill may be evaluated as construction progresses. CLOSURE The conclusions and recommendations presented in this letter report are based on the explorations accomplished by us and others for this study. The number, location and the depth of the explorations were completed within the site and proposal constraints so as to yield the information to formulate our recommendations. The successful construction of the proposed sewer line will depend on a great extent on the contractor's expertise to operate effectively in difficult soil conditions in a timely manner and proper backfill placement. It is recommended that RZA be retained to provide geotechnical engineering services during the excavation and backfill placement phases of the project. ' Fujiki & Associates, Inc./City of Tukwila L.I.D 32 29 July 1988 We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If, after reviewing this letter report you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully submitted, :RITTENHOUSEZEMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC kp • • , !i • • Lt .. %(■•■;/ •S / ONAt. tI* Project' Engineer .•. t ; .., ....,.‘ . ........ q ;:-. . ,-zs 4 f -- e s /o f, • • • . ,.. • - :..-; ,: ‘. 1.-1;,, . .; ... • by :k Jr . - A 0 '. REGIS1tV•\„‘ . c , .... a, _Az14 • I tt i :YSIONAN. 4 ,... , . Borings, Logs .8 -1 through -4 Test Pit Logs' TP -1. and TP-2 . . Li) Kurt W. Groesch, P.E., Associate Enclosure: A — H # .0011111111Mmh _,/,.. J. A i ...4 •••0 1, vl . *c;•• ‘e. 4 •,* . * N. • W-S718-1 • Page 6, .RZA I U LISE-ZEMAGi ASSOC., INC. Gootechnica1 / Hydrogeological Consultants SAMPLING IC I r 00 SPLIT SPOON SAMPLE 3' OD SHELBY SAMPLE t 2.5'10 RING SAMPLE B BULK SAMPLE * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED SOIL DESCRIPTION 1// U- X 1- STATION 15 4 78 I a. Lai Ground Surface Elevation Approximately 23 Feet WATER LEVEL AT TIME OF DRILLING z a. 2 GROUND WATER A A- ) 7—. BORING NUMBe, W 0. W.71.1 PROJECT NAME Southcenter Parkway Sewer 2 cr O • r•• CC *C SEAL DATE OBSERVATION WELL TIP STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE A BLOWS PER FOOT (140 lb. hammer, 30 Inch drop) 0 10 20 30 40 LABORATORY TESTS • % WATER CONTENT NP NON PLASTIC F---1111-4 LIQUID LIMIT / PLASTIC LIMIT b ‘--- NATURAL WATER CONTENT 50 _ 5 . - 10 -15 -20 . -25 -30 -35 40 21 I 4I . _ _ . . — ... . .._... — Sewer . - ... ........_ .... — -- _ Invert -- • Elevation --- . - - .. .. .— ... . •.,., 6" Asphalt Pavement Dense, moist, brown, gravelly, fine to medium SAND with some silt (Road base) Medium dense, saturated, gray, gravelly, fine to coarse SAND with some silt to silty (Fill) ) ATD Interbedded: Medium dense, saturated, gray, silty, fine SAND; Medium stiff, fine sandy SILT and organic PEAT stringers Very soft, saturated wnTlitieroi — Total depth = 14 feet Boring completed 20 July 1988 ....... _, ._... .. ._ . . _. .. . . . .RZA I U LISE-ZEMAGi ASSOC., INC. Gootechnica1 / Hydrogeological Consultants SAMPLING IC I r 00 SPLIT SPOON SAMPLE 3' OD SHELBY SAMPLE t 2.5'10 RING SAMPLE B BULK SAMPLE * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED SOIL DESCRIPTION 1// U- X 1- STATION 15 4 78 I a. Lai Ground Surface Elevation Approximately 23 Feet WATER LEVEL AT TIME OF DRILLING z a. 2 GROUND WATER A A- ) 7—. BORING NUMBe, W 0. W.71.1 PROJECT NAME Southcenter Parkway Sewer 2 cr O • r•• CC *C SEAL DATE OBSERVATION WELL TIP STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE A BLOWS PER FOOT (140 lb. hammer, 30 Inch drop) 0 10 20 30 40 LABORATORY TESTS • % WATER CONTENT NP NON PLASTIC F---1111-4 LIQUID LIMIT / PLASTIC LIMIT b ‘--- NATURAL WATER CONTENT 50 -. Asphalt t-0 - - - -15 -20 -25 -30 -35 40 6" Pavement /-- — . — ° °- ..... .... ....° ... - •_ - Very dense to medium dense, moist, brown, gravelly, 'fine to medium SAND with some silt (Road base) . _... --- ion ___ .____ ._ ATD _.. -- Very dense, saturated SAND -Medium stiff, saturated, gray, fine sandy SILT with PEAT stringers Loose, saturated, brown, silty, fine SAND 4I - r _ — 4 --- Sewer Invert Eleva -- — Total depth = 14 feet Boring completed 20 July 1988 -- -- -- :r .1 t I 1 t I I RZA f PJTTENJIOIISE -ZEA9 & ASSOC., INC. r � Geotechnical / HI/rlro enlogical Consultants SOIL DESCRIPTION STATION 11 + 66 Ground Surface Elevation Approximately SAMPLING 2 2' OD SPLIT SPOON SAMPLE ]r 3' OD SHELBY SAMPLE C 2.5' ID RING SAMPLE B BULK SAMPLE * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED 24 Feet GROUND WATER DATE WATER LEVEL AT TIME OF DRILLING Al p OBSERVATION WELL TIP A - r BORING NUMI. 8 ' 2 PROJECT NAME Southcenter Parkway Sewer 0 � 3 SEAL yy 0 W-5718-1 STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE A BLOWS PER FOOT (140 lb. hammer, 30 Inch drop) 0 10 20 30 40 LABORATORY TESTS • 16 WATER CONTENT NP NON PLASTIC --- -•-- -' -- LIQUID LIMIT L— NATURAL WATER CONTENT PLASTIC LIMIT 0 :1 i t t t J 1 •RZA SOIL DESCRIPTION STATION 1 + 77 Ground Surface Elevation Approximately SAMPLING I 2' OD SPLIT SPOON SAMPLE IC 3' OD SHELBY SAMPLE 2.5' ID RING SAMPLE B BULK SAMPLE * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED rfais: R1TTENHOLISE -ZEA? „ :' & ASSOC., INC. C:ratrchnical / 11itrlrngenlogica! Consultants 21 Feet GROUND WATER WATER LEVEL AT TIME OF DRILLING AI Dr 1 , OBSERVATION WELL TIP A- t4 BORING NUMl1, ,• 8 -3 w 0 N- 5718 -1 PROJECT NAME Southcenter Parkway Sewer z O c 3 SEAL DATE STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE A BLOWS PER FOOT (140 lb. hammer, 30 inch drop) 0 10 20 30 40 50 LABORATORY TESTS • % WATER CONTENT NP NON PLASTIC ► —• —a +— LIQUID LIMIT '-- NATURAL WATER CONTENT PLASTIC LIMIT 6" Asphalt Pavement /-- -- -• -- --- Sewer -.. -... w_.... .__ .. Elevatior ....... ..,.... ...... -- . .. ..... • - .... - Medium dense, moist, brown, gravelly, fine to mediun SAND with some fill (Road base) - Medium dense to loose, moist to saturated, brown and gray, silty, gravelly SAND (Fill) - 1T 2 3 1 - Invert A TTD I Interbedded: Very loose to loose, saturated, silty, fine SAND and organic, fiberous PEAT lenses and - stringers -10 • Total depth = 14 feet -15 Boring completed 20 July 1988 -20 ` -25 -30 -35 40 .... .—..— --- ..... • -_. ' -_. ._.. _. ..... _._.._. ._.._. .. _. - __ .... :1 i t t t J 1 •RZA SOIL DESCRIPTION STATION 1 + 77 Ground Surface Elevation Approximately SAMPLING I 2' OD SPLIT SPOON SAMPLE IC 3' OD SHELBY SAMPLE 2.5' ID RING SAMPLE B BULK SAMPLE * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED rfais: R1TTENHOLISE -ZEA? „ :' & ASSOC., INC. C:ratrchnical / 11itrlrngenlogica! Consultants 21 Feet GROUND WATER WATER LEVEL AT TIME OF DRILLING AI Dr 1 , OBSERVATION WELL TIP A- t4 BORING NUMl1, ,• 8 -3 w 0 N- 5718 -1 PROJECT NAME Southcenter Parkway Sewer z O c 3 SEAL DATE STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE A BLOWS PER FOOT (140 lb. hammer, 30 inch drop) 0 10 20 30 40 50 LABORATORY TESTS • % WATER CONTENT NP NON PLASTIC ► —• —a +— LIQUID LIMIT '-- NATURAL WATER CONTENT PLASTIC LIMIT Loose to medium dense, saturated, gray, silty, fine SAND with organic PEAT stringers RZA y � RITTENIIOLISE -ZEMAN F ;;SOC., INC. Gernerlcrrir ll / hllplrogc'olot;irnl Consultants SOIL DESCRIPTION STATION 5 + 80 Ground Surface Elevation Approximately 0 6" Asphalt Pavement Dense, moist, brown, fine to medium SAND with some silt (Road base) Very loose, moist to wet, brown and gray, gravelly, silty SAND (Fill) Total depth = 14 feet Boring completed 20 July 1988 SAMPLING = 2' OD SPLIT SPOON SAMPLE E 3' OD SHELBY SAMPLE g 2.5' ID RING SAMPLE B BULK SAMPLE * SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED 21 Feet w z a. w O -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -35 40 z a . . 2 N GROUND WATER 20 0 O o ATD SEAL DATE WATER LEVEL AT TIME OF DRILLING A o OBSERVATION WELL TIP BORING NUMBER B 1N.b. ' PROJECT NAME _4 hcenter Parkway Sewer STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE ♦ BLOWS PER FOOT (140 lb. hammer, 30 Inch drop) 10 20 30 40 50 S wer Invert Ele n LABORATORY TESTS • % WATER CONTENT NP NON PLASTIC 0----- -4 .--- LIQUID LIMIT ti-- NATURAL WATER CONTENT PLASTIC LIMIT Depth (feet) Soil Classification 0 - 2 2 - 6 6 - 8 • TEST PIT LOGS Test Pit TP-1 STA 16+75 (offset 55 feet) Test Pit TP-2 STA 16+75 (offset 75 feet) 14-1G ASPHALT PAVMENT Medium dense, moist, brown, silty, gravelly SAND (Fill) Medium dense, moist, bluish-gray, silty, fine to medium SAND and sandy silt Olympic pipeline encountered at 3i feet Medium dense, moist, brown, silty, gravelly SAND (Fill) Medium dense to dense, moist, gray, silty SAND with some gravel (Fill) Soft to medium stiff, wet, brown, sandy SILT with some organics No seepage No caving _ t..•, awxet c�rtuue# wv' n. YA.f 4+ tvRNV n• ee+ rf. vnv�rn..... w�. u.....•,..... w.x....•. x.........,... ur:...,..... .•r..w.+.x..••. +w..c....u_..... • •11 W �l CL ti ;(9 �. � ... `" H . t> __ix_ — J _ __ - 1 - -- - "144,1 "144,1 - -T I - T-- .3-_ 2--- . , -a - '-,9 -- f,: ,.1 ; • •- - --� _.. 1.�___�.. _ ._�>l C� 3 t-�Y-- - t- -• -••_ • i I I i 0 J • ' ' , • y . , '• odd► • } _• 1 -- - r ---+? j ._ Y .1.. id _ . lii T i , 1 ; 4 - V : 1 ... __. + r — ' p . — __ i ill ... . _. _�. 1__ . _ i W p LP. i G ' ei6J�! 1 05 1 1 _.1_ •� / wooly ... . , _� __ I ' ^ fT rl QQQ } . t _- - -:•J•• -•� __-. .t ",--: 0 . �` 1 1 r _ 1 µ.... .. I. _ ... -1-- _ _ _ �� t — t 1 ! : : -it U O � . .•• .qS9 'S ' - - _ -C — 1— L _ ' . s: I • W 1 i ' ; i 1 • • • APPENDIX B ) • 1 • Z;n r-' (•J PROFILE OF CABLE /DUCT /CASING UNDER SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TAKEN FROM COPY OF PUGET POWER WORK SKETCH DATED 1 -9 -73 FURNISHED TO CITY OF TUKWILA : � i _" `��• fi �i - •— � .�� : .... i • -• a• -- • - 1 !t1 ti; "j' ~ ' • ...: a7 • . . '(:.• • • 69 • '• •.* .'" otbktia3.doc Traffic Impact Analysis for the Outback Steakhouse July 20, 1997 Trunk En8ineers e Transportation Planners Christopher Brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A-201 Penton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 Fax 772-4321 RECEVED JUL 2 4 1997 TUKWLA • PUBLICWORK6.:- . Traffic Impact Analysis for the Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila, Washington RECEIVED JUL .24 199 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Purpose 1 Existing Road Network 4 Existing Traffic 4 Population and Traffic Growth 4 Trip Generation 5 Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment 5 Adjacent Land Uses 9 Levels of Service Description 9 Level of Service Analysis 11 Discussion 11 Mitigation Proportionate Fairshare 12 Conclusions 13 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1, Vicinity Map 2 Figure 2, Site Plan 3 Figure 3, Current Traffic Volumes 6 Figure 4, Future Traffic Volumes Without Project 7 Figure 5, Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment 8 Figure 6, Future Traffic Volumes With Project 10 LIST OF TABLES Table I, Trip Generation 5 Table II, Level of Service Criteria 9 Table III, Results of Level of Service Analysis 11 Table IV, Mitigation Proportionate Fairshare Costs 12 Table V, Developer Proportionate Share Contribution 13 Christopher Brown 4 Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., quite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 Purpose 1 Traffic Impact Analysis for the Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila. Washington Introduction The proposed Outback Steakhouse is a "high- quality, sit down" restaurant and will be located on the east side of Southcenter Parkway approximately 500 feet south of Strander Boulevard in front of the Double Tree Suites hotel. It will have seating for 238 patrons and its hours of operation will be limited to the evenings only. Since such a facility may increase vehicular traffic demands and potentially affect operations of adjacent roads during the p.m. peak hour, it is appropriate to review current and future traffic operations, identify potential impacts, and identify any appropriate mitigation measures. The location of the Outback Steakhouse relative its surroundings is shown in Figure 1, Vicinity Map on the following page. The purpose of this traffic impact analysis is to: o describe the road system serving the proposed development and assemble a database of current traffic operations; o identify an horizon year by which the proposed Outback Steakhouse development could be constructed and generating traffic; o develop an appropriate population growth rate for the surrounding area and estimate traffic volumes that might reasonably exist in the horizon year; o determine the trip generation rates or the amount of traffic likely to be produced by the development; o identify the primary directions of travel within the subject area and, based on this, assign site generated traffic to the surrounding road network; o compare current traffic operations with what is expected to exist in the future both with and without the proposed development; o identify any roadway capacity or other deficiencies that given construction of the proposed development would necessitate subsequent modification or improvement; o identify roadway improvements currently planned in the vicinity of the project; o determine appropriate mitigation measures to safely accommodate additional site generated traffic and compute fair share mitigation costs. RECEIVED JUL 2 41997 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS Christopher Brown i Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., (Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 r rrulul.Si I I S1 - - 'J.,' .9.:v 1 S 156TH ST 4 .71. _ TN ■ 4 400 = = i Q CRYSTAL ` '�r�� SPRINGS PARK . ..1 y ' <I y S � ; ST , RESlY/EY =tt > 16151 ..t> \ PARK r S'1164NDm ST SI .- ` g am} 5 163RD (FL r e JS' s 4. s " S 16sM s4-77/ N 9 h .< 1166M STj 2 I 168TH LN 6T S 167Th ST ST ST S "' 172ND PL ST ST 700 ST ry� L S Sar — •v 1 ST N 5100 179TH 1 LP ST *IR \ SOrN LAKE , 178TH T �kWI PKWY � \ 5 0UTHCENTER ' ` / / _ ®: EvANS BUCK 0 __ BAKER BL 0' y STRANDER d BLVD N'Ct "1I'' a sT 0 0 CC S0UrHCENTER PLA 1 ` DRCK LJ. l.3 I I % )51 BY MARRIOTT . 5 1. a- FS CORPORAT OR N •- -- • CORPORATE HINKLER DR PARKWAY PLAZA MI LAND O(R TRILAND JR • PAVILION MALL z W 0 0 0 SA +N DR BLVD ,wN10r, e(SIO NG CAIS(TNS N GNSCNNL( /IRR a rn N .181ST ST 168TH 2ND 5TH ST 7TH ST 4 300 178TH ST S 179TH _ 90TH ST IDIST ST, /� N •C ° N N Figure 1, Vicinity Map S 164 1 S__l5 ( S rr11P{ , / m l E s� ° m IV__ ST 1 t_ _ 1r u I 1 ‘`'.1 i L y l 1 157110 P1 1,,, `^ r, a S 153RD 6400 ENTF'� CH ` 5600 S 180TH 04 0 ' • ST TUKWILA Christopher Brown a Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 3 Christopher Brown U Associates 879 [rainier Avenue N.. quite A -201 Qenton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 4 Existing Road Network The road system serving the proposed Outback Steakhouse primarily includes Southcenter Parkway, Strander Boulevard, Klickitat Drive, and the freeway ramps. Other roads that may carry some site generated traffic include Minkler Boulevard and South 180th Street. Key elements of the roadway network are described as follows: o Southcenter Parkway is a five -lane arterial with a center, two -way, left -turn lane and numerous curb -cuts along its length. It has a posted speed limit of 35 mph is illuminated and has curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. Traffic signals and protected left -turn channelization exist at South 180th Street, the 17500 block, the 16700 block, Minkler Boulevard, Strander Boulevard, and at the I -5 on and off ramps. o Strander Boulevard is a five -lane arterial with a center, two -way, left -turn lane along most of its length. Left -turn channelization exists at intersections and major access drives. Traffic signals and protected left -turn channelization exist at the East Valley Highway (SR -181), Andover Park East, Andover Park West, the south access drive to South Center Mall, and Southcenter Parkway. It has a posted speed limit of 35 mph, is illuminated and has curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. o Minkler Boulevard is a lightly traveled two -lane collector with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. It is illuminated, with curbs and gutters, and sidewalks in places. posted speed limit of 35 mph is illuminated and has curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. Traffic signals and protected left -turn channelization exist at Southcenter Parkway, Andover Park West, and Andover Park East. Existing Traffic Current turning movement data for this study was obtained in April of 1997 in clear, dry weather conditions. No adverse weather or other conditions existed that might skew the data. These data are shown in both the level of service computations included in the appendix to this report as well as Figure 3, Current Traffic Volumes on page 6. Population and Traffic Growth Historic traffic volume data was analyzed to identify an historic growth rate in vehicular travel demand. Once determined, this rate was extrapolated to a future horizon year and uniformly applied to existing traffic volumes to estimate expected future volumes. In this study, the horizon year was taken to be the year 2010 since the Outback Steakhouse can reasonably be expected to be constructed, occupied, and generating traffic by this time. Historic traffic volume data made available by Tukwila Department of Public Works staff has been collected and compiled from 12 "control count" stations located throughout the City of Tukwila. Between 1986 and 1996 the annual rate of growth in traffic volumes was 1.5 percent. Taken from the present to the year 2010 this amounts to a compounded overall growth rate of 21.4 percent. / Christopher Brown 1 Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., buite A -201 Renton, (206) 772 -1188 WA 98055 -1380 Year 2010 traffic volumes, shown in Figure 4, Future Traffic Volumes Without Project, were estimated by applying the growth rate to those volumes shown in Figure 3, Current Traffic Volumes. Trip Generation The proposed Outback Steakhouse is a quality restaurant with a turnover rate likely to exceed at least one hour or longer. It will operate only between the hours 4:00 p.m. and midnight. The 5th edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual refers to this kind of facility as a Quality Restaurant and has published trip generation data under land use code (LUC) 831. The trip generation characteristics for the proposed development are given below. Table I, Trip Generation 5 Time Period Traffic Volumes A.W.D.T. 610 A.M. Inbound N/A A.M. Outbound N/A Noon Inbound N/A Noon Outbound N/A P.M. Inbound 34 vehicles per hour P.M. Outbound 14 vehicles per hour Note that land use code 831 contains no data on morning or noon -time trip generation. Morning and noon -time trip generation estimates are therefore not included. Their impacts are insignificant and have no effect on subsequent level of service analyses. Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment Given the generally north -south orientation of traffic in the area near the proposed development, the trip distribution is based on the north -south distribution of traffic at the most proximate major intersection, Southcenter Parkway and Strander Boulevard. Site generated traffic was assigned to the surrounding road network using the analogy method. That is, the assignment was based on current turning movement counts at intersections through which 10 or more site generated trips will likely pass. A description of the analogy method is given on pages 54 and 55 of the ITE publication Transportation and Land Development, by Vergil Stover and Frank Koepke. The trip distribution and traffic assignment for the Outback Steakhouse is shown on pages 8 of this report. Christopher brown g Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772-1188 z:l0C1Ickltot IDriv / 205 Strondor. Boulovord Figure 3, Current Traffic Volumes South 1180th Strout UV NOT TO SCALE Christopher Brown a Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055-1380 (200 772 -1188 I Figure 4, Future Traffic Volumes Without Project 7 South isOth Str..t INI NOT TO SCALE Christopher Brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 J MickItot Drive 5 — r1 0-5 Off *amp, Moll Entrance 8 I. S } r u r Figure 5, Trip Distribution and Si L t- 2 MInkI.r Boulevard dfic Assignment South 1180th Stra•t U V NOT TO SCALE Christopher Brown a Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., (Suite A-'201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 9 Adjacent Land Uses Apart from the Double Tree Suites hotel, land uses in the immediate vicinity of the Outback Steakhouse are primarily retail. There are also a variety of restaurants, a professional office building, gas station, a major distribution center, and a city park to the east. The proposed Outback Steakhouse is will not introduce any new divergent land uses or land use conflicts. It is a compatible land use. Levels of Service Description Level of service (LOS) describes the quality of traffic flow. Level of service ranges from LOS "A" to LOS "F." LOS "A" reflects ideal driving conditions where one can select speed and change lanes at will and expect delays of less than 5 seconds. LOS "F" represents severely constrained operations characterized by excessive delays. Level of service as a function of delay is shown in Table II. Table II, Level of Service Criteria sets forth the standards by which levels of service are determined. This, along with a detailed discussion on how levels of service are computed is contained in the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209 published by the Transportation Research Board. • Table II, Level of Service Criteria Signalized Levels of Service Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A 555.0 B >5.0 and 515.0 C >15.0 and 525.0 D >25.0 and 540.0 E >40.0 and 560.0 F >60.0 Unsignalized Level of Service Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A 555.0 B >5.0 and 510.0 C >10.0 and 520.0 D >20.0 and 530.0 E >30.0 and 545.0 F >45.0 There are several PC based software packages available to compute levels of service. Two programs, the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) and Signal -94, were used in this report. They were developed by the McTrans Center at the University of Florida and Strong Concepts, respectively and are used under license to Christopher Brown & Associates. Outputs from these software packages are included in the appendix of this report. In order to determining the level of service of signalized intersections, one must first have signal timing and phasing information. Signal -94 however, contains a routine by which optimum signal timing and phasing information is computed. Since optimal settings may Christopher Brown Co Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 ICllckltat Drive I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance Stranddr Boulevard Figure 6, Future Tr;tllir Volumes With Project 10 Mlnkler Boulevard South 9eoth Street UV NOT TO SCALE Christopher Brown a Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1580 (206) 772-1188 A not be in effect in actual practice, there may be some difference between actual and computed settings. Such difference however, are typically minor. This notwithstanding, the same signal phasing and timing settings are used in all three of the "Current," "Future Without Project," and "Future With Project" scenarios and thus provide a common basis for comparison. Level of Service Analysis As shown in the table below, neither background growth nor the development itself are expected to degrade operations of the adjacent road network to unacceptable levels through the year 2010. While this is primarily due to the adequacy of the existing road network it should be noted that there is a significant difference between the peak period of operation of the road system and the Outback Steakhouse. While the former tends to be between 3 :15 and 4:15, the latter tends to occur much later in the evening when there is an abundant supply of reserve capacity. Accordingly, only the p.m. peak hour is included in this analysis and those intersections through which fewer than 10 site generated trips would pass have been excluded. Table III, Results of Level of Service Analysis 11 Signalized Intersections on Southcenter Parkway @ Minkler Boulevard @ Strander Boulevard @ Klickitat Drive I -5 Off Ramp at Mall Entrance Current 1997 Year 2010 Conditions w/o Project LOS B B C B Delay 8 9 20 8 LOS Delay B 15 B 18 E 55 B 15 Year 2010 w/ Project LOS Delay B 15 B. 18 E 56 N/A The table above shows that only the intersection at Klickitat Drive will experience any significant reduction in level of service due to the addition of background growth traffic. Notwithstanding, this reduction is from LOS "C" to LOS "E" and, according to City of Tukwila standards, LOS "E" is an acceptable level of service. It should also be noted that this degradation takes place over a 13 year period and that the Outback Steakhouse will have been constructed and in full operation long before the year 2010. In summary, no adverse traffic flow consequences can be associated with full implementation of the Outback Steakhouse. Increases in vehicular traffic will be minimal and the road system as it currently exists is well able to handle the minor, additional traffic. Discussion With the addition of site generated traffic and with no changes in geometry or traffic controls, adequate levels of service and safe traffic operations will continue beyond the year 2010 at all impacted intersections. No need exists to change current roadway geometry or traffic controls. Christopher Brown i Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Denton. WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 At the project site access to Southcenter Parkway, good levels of service and excellent entering sight distances exist suggesting that no remedial measures are necessary through the year 2010. As currently proposed and with future forecast traffic conditions and roadway geometry, the access will operate very well. It may be discerned that the reason there will be no traffic impacts is that the peak hour of the site does not coincide with that of the arterial and freeway systems. These tend to be in the 3:15 to 4:15 interval, essentially before the opening time of the restaurant. Indeed, for this reason no reduction in traffic for "pass -by" trips has been used, rather all site traffic is considered to be associated with "primary" or destination trips. Mitigation Proportionate Fairshare The City of Tukwila has a number of transportation improvements programmed for the next six years that are partially funded by developer contributions or mitigation proportianate fairshare costs. The following is a list of these projects as provided by Ms. Joanna Spencer. Table IV, Mitigation Proportionate Fairshare Costs Southcenter /Strander 3,899 4,853 954 $ 134,000 $ 140 - widen for WB left turns Andover Park E /Strander 3,211 3,905 694 $ 94,000 $ 135 - widen for n/s left turns Andover Park W /Strander 3,082 4,016 934 $ 296,000 $ 317 - widen for n/s left turns S 180th St. /SR181 5,236 7,760 2,524 $ 1,200,000 $ 475 - widen n/s and e/w Andover Park EBaker 790 1,453 663 $ 250,000 $ 377 - n/s lefts, signal Andover Park W/Minkler 2,441 3,078 637 $ 250,000 $ 392 - n/s lefts, signal Southcenter Parkway /168 2,425 3,327 902 $ 150,000 $ 166 - signal W Valley /Strander 3,433 4,316 883 $ 250,000 $ 283 - NB dual left turns lanes Interurban Bridge 2,831 3,945 1,114 $ 1,250,000 $ 1,122 - widen for dual lefts Southcenter Parkway/Minkler 2,666 3,573 907 $ 123,900 $ 137 12 Intersection or Link Year 1990 Year 2010 Difference Improvement Cost/Trip Volume Volume Cost Christopher Brown Cs Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 A comparison between Figure 5, Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment and Table IV, Mitigation Proportionate Fairshare Costs shows how access to the Outback Steakhouse could be enhanced by improvements programmed by the City of Tukwila. From this, it is apparent that only those improvements at Southcenter Parkway /Strander Boulevard and Southcenter Parkway/Minkler Boulervard pertain. Fairshare mitigation costs are therefore appropriatly computed as follows: Table V, Developer Proportionate Share Contribution Project Cost per Trip Number of Trips Fairshare Cost Southcenter /Strander $ 140 4 $ 560 - widen for WB left turns Southcenter Parkway/Minkler $ 137 3 $ 411 Conclusions The following conclusions may be drawn. 1. The project will generate some 610 vehicular trips per day with 48 of these in the evening peak hour. 2. Including this project with background traffic growth does not appear to alter arterial levels of service during the morning, noon, or evening peak hours. 3. On the strength of the trip generation data included herein, the analogy method based distribution adds little traffic to key area intersections. 4. No intersection through which 10 or more site generated trips pass will experience any reduction in level of service as a direct result of site generated traffic. Adequate levels of service will remain through the horizon year of 2010. 5. Existing roadway and associated traffic controls are adequate to accommodate potential future site related traffic with no need for modification or revision. 6. Given continued adequate operations, no mitigation measures are needed as a direct result of the Outback Steakhouse. It may be appropriate however, to contribute, on a proportionate fairshare basis, to proprammed future improvements. 7. Finally, there is a significant difference between the peak hours of operation of the adjacent street system and the Outback Steakhouse. The former tends to be in the 3 :15 to 4:15 interval while the latter occurs much later in the evening. Adequate reserve capacity will therefore remain available to Outback patrons well beyond the horizon year of 2010 and there will be no need for infrastructure improvements as a direct result of the Outback Steakhouse. 13 Recommended Total Developer Contribution = $ 971 Christopher Brown Cs Associates 879 12ainier Avenue N.. Suite A -201 Renton. WA 980554380 (206) 7724188 Traffic impact Analysis • for the Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila. Washington Appendix Capacity and Level of Service Computations along Southcenter Parkway Minkler Boulevard. Current 1997 Conditions 1 Future 2001 Conditions without Project -- 6 Future 2001 Conditions with Project 11 Strander Boulevard Current 1997 Conditions Future 2001 Conditions without Project Future 2001 Conditions with Project Klickitat Drive Current 1997 Conditions Future 2001 Conditions without Project Future 2001 Conditions with Project @ 1-5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance : • Current 1997 Conditions ' 40 Future 2001 Conditions without Project 45 @ Site Access / On Site Queuing 50 16 20 24 28 32 • • 36 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. / • \ North G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 0 .0 0 0 12.0 1 36 .0 0 615 24.0 2 + v G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% 48 12.0 1 \ 0 .0 0 / + / 55 .0 0 0 .0 0 + + ++ v 648 24.0 2 G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% 90 .0 0 / 18 .0 0 0 12.0 1 04/24/97 09:29:35 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES / \ North Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .66 .50 0- Y Y. Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .70 .90 .65 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .66 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Sq 21 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 * * / ** G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 0 1 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph vph vph vph N-RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N-TH 615 .66 932 TH 932 2 1.05 979 .00 .00 N-LT 48 .50 96 LT 96 1 1.00 96 1.00 .00 E-RT 90 .70 129 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E-TH 0 .90 0 LT+TH+RT 214 1 1.00 214 .40 .60 E-LT 55 .65 85 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S-RT 18 .64 28 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S-TH 648 .66 982 TH+RT 1010 2 1.05 1060 .00 .03 S-LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W-RT 36 .64 56 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W-TH 0 .90 0 TH+RT 56 1 1.00 56 .00 1.00 W-LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 04/24/97 09:29:35 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 E-LT+TH+RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .819 .890 1.00 1357 S- TH+RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .996 1.000 1.00 3710 W- TH+RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .765 1.000 1.00 1425 0 :: • Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions C - Cycle Length G - Actual Green Time g - Effective Green Time go - Opp. Effective Green Time N - Number of Lanes No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate PLT - Proportion of LT PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate tL - Lost Time LTC - Left Turns per Cycle Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio gf - First LT Effect. Green ,qro - Opposing Queue Ratio gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green fs - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) 'PL - Proportion of LT (9 -17) n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) EL1 - TH Equivalent for LT EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) fmin - Minimum Value for fLT fm - LT Factor for LT (9 -17) fLT - LT Factor for Lane Group W- TH +RT Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 56 1425 .039 .281 401 .140 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Approach Input /Calculation N -LT E -LT S -LT 60.0000 15.8802 16.8802 16.8802 1 .0000 1 .0000 85.0000 . 3972 .0000 56.0000 3.0000 1.4167 .9333 1.0000 2.4435 .7187 .3032 14.4367 .8400 . 3972 .0000 1.0000 1.3720 .0000 . 1655 .8899 .8899 Sum(v /s) = .498 Xc = .585 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp vph vphg vph -- - N- TH 979 3725 .263 .619 2305 .425 N- LT Pri. 96 1770 .054 .142 251 .382 * E- LT +TH +RT 214 1357 .158 .281 382 .560 * S- TH +RT 1060 3710 .286 .427 1584 .669 * 04/24/97 09:29:36 W -LT .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .04/24/97, 09:29:36 Outback Minkler Current SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1.L1.4] - HCM Level - of-- Service Worksheet Ap Lane pr Group ch . Mvts N- TH N LT E- LT +TH +RT S TH +RT Steakhouse - Tukwila Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway 1997 Conditions Vol Ratio v /c W TH +RT .140 Cycle= 60:' Int Total .536 Green Ratio g/C Unif Delay Delay Fact d1 DF sec /v -- .425 .619 4.5 .85 .382 .142 17.8 .85 . 560 .281 14.0 .85 . 669 .427 10.5 .85 .281 12.3 .85 Lane Cal Incr Group Term Delay Capac m . d2 vph - sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v Lan Grp. Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v 2305 16 .08 . 3.9 A 251 16 .49 15.6 C+ > 4.9 382 16 1.41 1 B > 1 1584 16 .78 9.7 B+ > 9.7 401 16 .01 10.4 : B > 10.4 B 7.9 B+ 0 4 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 21 1 Phase 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 * * / ** / North v MVMT TOTALS 'Param:Units AdjVol: vph 'Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v To Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft * * *> G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% N Approach RT TH LT 0/0 24/2 12/1 0 28 8 0 62 14 0 2305 251 A C+ .00 .43 .38 .0 6.4 25.7 0 26 10 0 127 22 0 12 3 0 157 69 N Approach 1075 A .42 8.1 36 149 15 157 v + + ++ v G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0 OFF =66.9% E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 129 0 85 29 1031 0 56 0 0 2405 0/0 12/1 0/0 0/0 24/2 0/0 0/0 12/1 0/0 0 20 0 0 30 0 0 6 0 0 28 0 0 43 0 0 28 0 0 382 0 0 1584 0 0 401 0 4923 B .00 .56 .0 22.1 0 20 0 46 B+ .00 .00 .67 .0 .0 15.0 0 0 66 0 0 213 0 5 0 0 20 0 130 0 0 256 E Approach S Approach 214 B .56 22.1 20 46 5 130 1060 B+ .67 15.0 66 213 20 256 B B+ .00 .00 .14 .00 .54 .0 .0 16.8 .0 12.6 0 0 4 0 126 0 0 10 0 418 0 0 0 0 1 0 41 34 0 256 Int W Approach Total 56 B .14 16.8 4 10 04/ 09:29:37 2405 B+ .54 12.6 126 418 1 41 34 256 05 / .\ North Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions w/o Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Area Location Type: NONCBD 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 12.0 1 -- 44 .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 746 24.0 2 + v G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% 58 12.0 1 \ 0 .0 0 + + ++ v 786 24.0 2 . * * ** G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% \ 109 .0 0 0 12.0 1 / 67 / 22 .0 0 07/18/97 12:46:21 Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES / \ .0 0 North. Phasing: SEQUENCE 21. PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y.Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .66 .50 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .70 .90 .65 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .66 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Sq 21 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 I Phase 5 Phase 6 * * / ** G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 000 ~ Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Gou hoeoter Parkway Future 3010 Conditions w/o Project N-RT 0 .90 0 N-TH 746 ,66 1130 0-LT 58 .50 116 • ''^ ' `` • TH LT ''�'`�� �� SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 I'1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Dtil Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - ' vph 0 0 1.00 0 .00 ,00 1130 2 1.05 1186 .00 .00 116 1 1.00 116 1.00 .00 E-RT 109 ,70 156 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 IC-TB 0 .90 0 LT+TB+RT 259 1 1'00 259 .40 ,60 }I-LT 67 .65 103 -- 0 0 1'00 0 .00 .00 S-RT 22 .64 34 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 8-TB 786 .66 1191 TB+8T 1225 2 ' 1.05 1286 .00 ,03 S-LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 '00 .00 W-RT 44 .64 69 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W-TH 0 .90 0 TB+BT 69 1 1.00 69 .00 1.00 W-LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 07/18/97 13:46:21 SI00AL94/TEAPAC[\/1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet "Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat- oh Mvmts Satfl Loa Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loo Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TB 1900 2 1.000 .980 1,000 1'000 1'000 1,0 1.000 1.000 1,00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 1'008 ,980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1'008 .950 1,00 1770 E-LT+TH+RT 1900 1 1.000 '980 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .819 .865 1,00 1319 S- TH+RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .996 1.000 1.00 3710 ��� c/ ,v x/ W- T8+BT 1900 1 1.000 ,980 1.008 1.080 1.000 1.0 .765 1.000 1,00 1425 i •-■ E- LT +TH +RT S- W- .x:L`.'n.:er „pvCT'arMM.a`T.su w. nv. a.. n= wn ...u..+wne..n....�na�.e.m..�+. run TH +RT TH +RT 1286 69 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions w/o Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Approach Input /Calculation N -LT E -LT S -LT C - Cycle Length G - Actual Green Time g - Effective Green Time go - Opp. Effective Green Time N - Number of Lanes No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate PLT - Proportion of LT PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate tL - Lost Time LTC - Left Turns per Cycle Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio gf - First LT Effect. Green qro - Opposing Queue Ratio gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green fs - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) PL - Proportion of LT (9 -17) n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) EL1 - TH Equivalent for LT EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) fmin - Minimum Value for fLT fm - LT Factor for LT (9 -17) fLT - LT Factor for Lane Group SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp vph vphg N- TH 1186 3725 .318 .619 2305 .515 N- LT Pri. 116 1770 .066 .142 251 .462 * 259 1319 .196 .281 371 .698 * * 3710 1425 .347 .048 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 60.0000 15.8800 16.8800 16.8800 1 .0000 1 .0000 103.0000 . 3977 . 0000 69.0000 3.0000 1.7167 1 . 1 500 1.0000 1.7442 .7187 .8727 15.1358 . 8319 . 3977 . 0000 1.0000 1.4467 .0000 .1656 . 8647 .8647 vph .427 1584 .281 401 .812 .172 Cycle Length, C 60 sec Sum(v /s) = .609 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = .716 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 07/18/97 12:46:21 W -LT .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 000 I . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions w/o Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol. Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C d1 DF Capac .m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- sec /v vph - sec /v sec /v - sec /v - N- TH .515 .619 4.9 .85 2305 16 .17 4.3 A N- LT .462 .142 18.0 .85 251 16 .99 16.3 C+ > E- LT +TH +RT .698 .281 14.7 .85 371 16 3.90 16.4 C+ > 16.4: C+ S- TH +RT .812 .427 11.5 .85 1584 16 2.36 12.1 B Cycle= 60" Int Total .652 5.4 B+ > 12.1 B 1 W- TH +RT .172 .281 12.4 .85 401 16 .02 10.5 B > 10.5 B 0009 North + v MVMT TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl :LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft * * * > G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 1302 B+ .51 8.8 48 193 v Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions w/o Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 21 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 * * / ** G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% + + ++ v G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% N Approach RT TH LT 0 1186 11 0/0 24/2 12/1 0 33 9 0 62 14 0 2305 251 A C+ .00 .51 .46 .0 7.0 26.7 0 35 13 0 166 27 0 15 3 0 191 84 N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 156 0 0/0 12/1 0 24 0 28 0 371 C+ .00 .70 .0 26.2 0 28 0 58 0 6 0 157 E Approach 259 C+ .70 26.2 28 58 103 36 1250 0 69 0 0 2916 0/0 0/0 24/2 0/0 0/0 12/1 0/0 0 0 36 0 0 8 0 0 0 43 0 0 28 0 0 0 1584 0 0 401 0 4912 B .00 .00 .81 .0 .0 17.8 0 0 96 0 0 282 0 0 25 0 0 311 S Approach 1286 B .81 17.8 96 282 18 6 25 191 157 311 07/18/97 12:46:22 B B+ .00 .00 .17 .00 .65 .0 .0 17.1 .0 14.5 0 0 5 0 177 0 0 13 0 546 0 0 2 0 51 0 0 42 0 311 Int W Approach Total B .17 17.1 5 13 69 2916 B+ .65 14.5 177 546 2 51 42 311 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPACCV1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection 0 - / \ North G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 0 . 0 0 .0 0 0 12.0 1 38 .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 661 24.0 2 v Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .66 .50 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .70 .90 .65 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .66 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Sq 21 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 ( Phase 5 Phase 6 * * / ** G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% 53 12.0 1 0 .0 0 + + ++ v 722 24.0 2 G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% 19 .0 0 100 .0 0 / •\ 0 12.0 1 58 .0 0 North 07/18/97 13:14:36 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > 1 WIDTHS v LANES Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 001 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph - vph vph - vph -- N -RT 0 .90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 661 .66 1002 TH 1002 2 1.05 1052 .00 .00 N -LT 53 .50 106 LT 106 1 1.00 106 1.00 .00 E -RT 100 .70 143 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -TH 0 .90 0 LT +TH +RT 232 1 1.00 232 .38 .62 E -LT 58 .65 89 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -RT 19 .64 30 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -TH 722 .66 1094 TH +RT 1124 2 1.05 1180 .00 .03 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -RT 38 .64 59 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -TH. 0 .90 0 TH +RT 59 1 1.00 59 .00 1.00 W -LT 0 .90. 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 07/18/97 13:14:36 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 E- LT +TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .817 .888 1.00 1350 S- TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .996 1.000 1.00 3711 W- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .765 1.000 1.00 1425 001; W- TH +RT Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Approach Input /Calculation N -LT E -LT S -LT C - Cycle Length G - Actual Green Time g - Effective Green Time go - Opp. Effective Green Time N - Number of Lanes No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate PLT - Proportion of LT PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate tL - Lost Time LTC - Left Turns per Cycle Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio gf - First LT Effect. Green qro - Opposing Queue Ratio • - Opp. Queue Effect. Green gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green fs - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) -PL - Proportion of LT (9 -17) n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) EL1 - TH Equivalent for LT EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) fmin - Minimum Value for fLT fm - LT Factor for LT (9 -17) fLT - LT Factor for Lane Group Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 60.0000 15.8800 16.8800 16.8800 1.0000 1.0000 89.0000 .3836 .0000 59.0000 3.0000 1.4833 .9833 1.0000 2.2751 .7187 .4372 14.6049 .8381 .3836 .0000 1 .0000 1.3893 .0000 .1639 .8876 .8876 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp vph vphg vph -- - N- TH 1052 3725 .282 .619 2305 .456 N- LT Pri. 106 1770 .060 .142 251 .422 * E- LT +TH +RT 232 1350 .172 .281 380 .611 * S- TH +RT 1180 3711 .318 .427 1584 .745 * 59 1425 .041 .281 401 .147 Sum(v /s) = .550 Xc = .647 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 07/18/97 13:14:37 W -LT .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 0013 Outback Steakhouse.- Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway. Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service. Worksheet_ Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay pr Group Ratio 'Ratio Delay Fact ch Mvts v /c . g /C, d1 DF - -. sec /v TH N- LT .456' .619 4.6 .85 2305 16 .422 .142 17.9 .85 251 16 Lane Cal Group Term Capac m ..vph - E- LT +TH +RT .611. .281 14.2 .85 .380 16 S- TH +RT .745 .427 11 .85 1584 16 W- TH +RT .147 .281 12.3 .85 401 16 Incr ' Lane Delay Group d2 _Delay sec /v . sec /v Lan .Grp,..Appr Appr LOS Delay_ LOS.. sec /v . .10 4.0 A .70 15.9 C+ > 5. B+ 2.04 14.1 B > B > 1 B 1.38 10.7 B .01 10.5 B Cycle 60" Irit . Total . 591 10. B 8.5 B+ 0014 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 21 **/** / North MVMT TOTALS -Param:Units AdjVol: vph Wid/Ln:ft/# g/C Rqd@C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v/c Avg Del:s/v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v/c Avg Del:s/v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft G/C= .125 G= 7.5" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% C= 60 sec 1158 Phase 2 v G/C= .410 G= 24.6" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=19.2% N Approach RT TH LT 0 1052 106 0/0 24/2 12/1 0 30 9 0 62 14 0 2305 251 A C+ .00 .46 .42 .0 6.6 26.2 0 29 12 0 140 24 0 13 3 0 169 77 N Approach B+ .45 8.4 41 164 16 169 Phase 3 + + + + v 143 0 0/0 12/1 0 21 0 28 0 380 B .00 .61 .0 23.2 0 22 0 50 0 6 0 141 232 B .61 23.2 22 50 141 G/C= .265 G= 15.9" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=66.9% G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y=12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% E Approach S Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT E Approach 89 31 1149 0/0 0/0 24/2 0 0 33 0 0 43 0 0 1584 .00 .00 .75 .0 .0 16.2 0 0 80 0 0 248 0 0 23 0 0 285 S Approach 1180 B .75 16.2 80 248 6 23 285 W Approach Int RT TH LT Total 0 59 0 0 2629 0/0 0/0 12/1 0/0 0 0 7 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 401 0 4921 .00 .00 .15 .0 .0 16.9 0 0 4 0 0 11 B+ .00 .59 .0 13.4 0 147 0 473 0 0 1 0 46 0 0 36 0 285 Int W Approach Total 59 2629 B B+ .15 .59 16.9 13.4 4 147 11 473 1 46 36 285 0015 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1.L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - / North .0 0 / 0 .0 0 / + / 279 24.0 2 0 .0 0 -- 0 .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. + + + ▪ * * ** + +> v G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 665 24.0 2 + v G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% 385 24.0 2 0 .0 0 84 24.0 2 G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% 547 12.0 1 / 294 12.0 1 0 .0 0 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES / \ North 04/ 09:45:05 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type RT TH LT.Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .89 .90 .77 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .88 .88 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Sq 21 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 * * / ** G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% - Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 N -TH 665 .88 756 TH 756 2 1.05 N -LT 385 .93 ' 414 LT 414 2 1.03 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow vph -- vph -- vph - vph Prop.of LT RT 0 .00 .00 794 .00 .00 426 1.00 .00 E -RT 547 .89 615 RT 615 1 1.00 615 .00 1.00 E -TH 0 .90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -LT 279 .77 362 LT 362 2 1.03 373 1.00 .00 S -RT 294 .88 334 RT 334 1 1.00 334 .00 1.00 S -TH. 841 .88 956 TH 956 2 1.05 1004 .00 .00 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 04/24/97 09:45:06 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet ?Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 E- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 E- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 S- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 S- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 1'( Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity. Analysis Worksheet Ap pr ch Lane Group Mvts N- TH 794 3725 N- LT Pri. 426 3539 E- RT .. .. 615 1 583 E- LT Pri. 373 3539 S- RT 334 1583 S- TH 1004 3725 Cycle Length, C. 60'sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec Ap pr ch Lane Group Mvts N- TH N- LT E- RT E- LT S- RT S- TH LT Phase Type Cycle= 60" Int Total .541 Adj Flow Rate vph Adj Satfl Rate vphg Vol Green Unif Delay Ratio Ratio Delay Fact v/c g/C d1 DF -- -- sec /v .317 .673 3.1 .85 . 480 .251 14.5 .85 .736 .528 8.3 .85 . 465 .227 15.2 .85 . 325• .649 3.6 .85 .724 .372 12.3 .85 Flow Ratio v/s Green Ratio g/C . 213 .673 2508 .317. . 120 .251 888 .480 .388 .528 Lane Group Capac vph 836 .105 .227 803 .465 . 211 .649 1028 .325 . 269 .372 1387 .724 Sum(v /s) = .658 Xc = .731 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet • • Lane Cal Group Term Capac m V /C. Ratio v/c Incr Lane Delay Group d2 Delay vph sec /v sec /v Crit Lane Grp .736 04/24/97 09:45:06 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS sec /v - 2508 16 .03 2.7 A 888 16 .33 12.7 B > 6.2 836 16 2.38 9.4 B+ 803 16 .32 13.3 B > 10.9 B 1028 16 .07 3.1 A 1387 16 1.33 11.8 B > 9.6 B+ > 8.8 B+ 13 • Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 21 1 Phase 1 * * / ** / North + v MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft +" + * * ** +> G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 0 794 426 615 0 373 334 1004 0 0 0 0 3546 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 24/2 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 23 14 42 0 13 25 29 0 0 0 0 0 67 25 53 0 23 65 37 0 0 0 0 0 2508 888 836 0 803 1028 1387 0 0 0 0 7450 A B B+ .00 .32 .48 .74 .0 4.4 20.0 14.9 0 15 36 38 0 82 91 119 0 9 11 10 0 109 135 245 N Approach E Approach 1220 B+ .37 9.8 51 173 20 20 25 135 Phase 2 Phase 3 G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% B A B .00 .47 .32 .72 .0 20.9 5.5 17.9 0 33 8 75 0 81 37 216 988 B .63 17.2 71 200 245 0 10 0 122 S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 1338 B+ .62 14.8 83 253 266 B+ .00 .00 .00 .00 .54 .0 .0 .0 .0 13.7 0 0 0 0 205 0 0 0 . 0 626 4 21 0 0 0 0 65 99 266 0 0 0 0 266 Int S Approach W Approach Total 0 .00 .0 0 0 0 0 04/24/97 09:45:07 3546 B+ .54 13.7 205 626 65 266 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM.Input Worksheet Intersection # • 0 - .0 0 /. 0 .0 0 / + / 339 24.0 2 0 .0 0 -- 0 .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. Sq 21 * * / ** / North 807 24.0 2 Phase 1 Phase 2 + + + + * * * + +> V G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% v G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% 467 24.0 2 0 .0 0. 1021 24.0 2 G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% 664. 12.0 1 357 12.0 1 0 .0 0 07/1 12 :51:42 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES / North. Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT . N .0 2. 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .89 .90 .77 0- Y Y Y 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .88 . .88 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 Phase 3 Phase 4 ( Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 0 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 807 .88 917 TH 917 ' 2 1.05 963 .00 .00 N -LT 467 .93 •502 LT 502 2 1.03 517 1.00 .00 E -RT 664 .89 746 RT 746 1 1.00 746 .00 1.00 E -TH 0 .90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -LT 339 .77 440 LT 440 2 1.03 453 1.00 .00 S -RT 357 .88 406 RT, 406 1 1.00 406 .00 1.00 S -TH 1021 .88 1160 TH 1160 2 1.05 1218 .00 .00 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet -Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr .Group Ideal of Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow - -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.0001.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 E- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 158 E- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 S- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 S- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 0021 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap pr ch N- N- E- E- Ap pr ch Lane Group Mvts S- RT S- TH Lane Group Mvts LT Phase Type TH 963 3725 LT Pri. 517 3539 RT 746 1583 LT Pri. 453 3539 Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 Vol Ratio v/c N- TH .384 N- LT .582 E- RT .892 E- LT .564 S- RT .395 S- TH .878 Cycle= 60" Int Total .656 Adj Flow Rate . vph Adj Satfl Rate vphg 406 1 583 1218 3725 Green Unif Delay Ratio Delay Fact g/C d1 DF -- sec /v .673 3.3 . 251 15.0 . 528 9.6 . 227 15.6 .649 3.8 . 372 13.4 Flow Ratio v/s . 258 . 146 . 471 .128 Green Lane Ratio Group g/C Capac -- vph ..673 2508 .384 . 251 888 .582 . 528 836 V/C Ratio v /c .892 .227 803 .564 . 25 .649 1028 .395 . 327 .372 1387 .878 Sum(v /s) = .798 Xc = .887 L1.4] - HCM Level-of-Service Worksheet Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph - Incr Delay d2 sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v Crit Lane Grp Lan Grp LOS 07/18/97 12:51:42 Appr Delay LOS sec /v - .85 2508 16 .05 2.8 ' A .85 888 16 .73 13.5 B > 6.6 B+ .85 836 16 8.49 16.7 C+ .85 803 16 .70 14.0 B > 15.7 C+ .85 1028 16 .14 3.3 A .85 1387 16 4.83 16.2 C+ > 13.0 B > 11.5 B 0122 Outback Steakhouse Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 21 1 Phase 1 * * / ** North MVMT TOTALS 'Param:Units AdjVol: vph - Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft + + * * ** +> G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% v Phase 2 1 Phase 3 G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 0 963 517 746 0 453 406 1218 0 0 0 0 4303 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 24/2 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 28 17 49 0 15 29 34 0 0 0 0 0 67 25 53 0 23 65 37 0 0 0 0 0 2508 888 836 0 803 1028 1387 0 0 0 0 7450 A B C+ .00 .38 .58 .89 .0 4.7 20.9 26.2 0 19 45 81 0 106 113 167 G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% 0 10 13 12 0 12 5 25 0 0 0 0 77 0 133 163 297 0 148 120 322 0 0 0 0 322 N Approach E Approach 1480 B+ .45 10.4 64 219 23 163 B A C+ .00 .56 .40 .88 .0 21.8 6.0 23.7 0 41 10 121 0 100 48 284 1199 C+ .77 24.5 122 267 24 297 S Approach 1624 B .76 19.3 131 332 30 322 0 12:51 :43 B .00 .00 .00 .00 .66 .0 .0 .0 .0 17.7 0 0 0 0 317 0 0 0 0 818 Int W Approach Total 0 4303 B .00 .66 .0 17.7 0 317 0 818 0 77 0 322 0023 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM .Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 -- 0 .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. Sq 21 * * / ** / North Phase 1 + -I- ** + +> V G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% .0 0 818 24.0 2 + v * * * +> + G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% 467 24.0 2 0 0 1028 24.0 2 G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% 664 12.0 1 343 24.0 2 North 659 12.0 1 0 .0 0 Area Location. Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES / \ 07/18/97 13:15:59 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated - $ RT TH LT.Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT . N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .89 .90 .77 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .88 .88 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Phase 2 Phase 3 I Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% X024 ...... Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Ap pr ch Lane LT - Adj Group Phase Flow Mvts Type Rate -- -- vph N- TH .976 3725 .262 N- LT Pri. 517 3539- .146 E- RT 746 1583. .471 E- LT Pri. . 458 3539 .129 S- RT 749 1583 .473 S- TH 1226 3725 .329 Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4],- HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Ap pr ch Lane Group Mvts. N- TH N- LT E- RT E- LT S- RT S- TH Vol Ratio v/c Cycle= 60" Int Total .693 Adj Satfi Rate vphg Green Unif Delay Ratio Delay Fact g/C d1 DF -- sec /v -- Flow Ratio v/s Analysis Worksheet Green Ratio g/C Lane Group Capac vph v/c Ratio v/c .673 2508 .389 .251 888 .582 .528 836 .892 .227 803 .570 .649 1028 .729 .372 1387 .884 Sum(v /s) = .800 Xc = .889 Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph Incr Delay d2 sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v Crit Lane Grp 07/18/97 13:15:59 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS sec /v - .389 .673 3.3 .85 2508 16 .05 2.9 A .582 .251 15.0 .85 888 16 .73 13.5 B > 6.5 B+ .892 .528 9.6 .85 836 16 8.49 16.7 C+ .570 .227 15.7 .85 803 16 .73 14.0 B > 15.7 C+ .729 .649 5.3 .85 1028 16 1.85 6.4 B+ .884 .372 13.4 .85 1387 16 5.11 16.5 C+ > 12.7 B > 11.5 B 0026 Outback, Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 21 1 Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 * * / ** / North + + ^ + + * * ** + +> v G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% +. + + v G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% 07/18/97 13:16:00 C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% -MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 0 976 517 746 0 458 749 1226 0 0 0 0 4672 Wid /Ln:ft /# 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 24/2 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 g/C Rqd @C:% 0 28 17 49 0 15 50 34 0 0 0 0 g/C Used: % 0 67 25 53 0 23 65 37 0 0 0 0 SV @E: vph 0 2508 888 836 0 803 1028 1387 0 0 0 0 7450 Svc Lvl:LOS A B C+ B B+ C+ B Deg Sat:v /c .00 .39 .58 .89 .00 .57 .73 .88 .00 .00 .00 .00 .69 Avg Del:s /v .0 4.8 20.9 26.2 .0 21.8 10.3 24.3 .0 .0 .0 .0 17.7 Tot Del:min 0 19 45 81 0 42 32 124 0 0 0 0 343 # Stops:veh 0 108 113 167 0 102 125 287 0 0 0 0 902 Max Que:veh 0 11 13 12 0 12 9 26 0 0 0 0 83 Max Que: ft 0 135 163 297 0 149 222 325 0 0 0 0 325 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 1493 1204 1975 0 4672 Svc Lvl:LOS B+ C+ B B Deg Sat:v /c .46 .77 .82 .00 .69 Avg Del:s /v 10.4 24.5 19.0 .0 17.7 Tot Del:min 64 123 156 0 343 # Stops:veh 221 269 412 0 902 Max Que:veh 24 24 35 0 83 Max Que: ft 163 297 325 0 325 0027 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Sq 31 * * / ** North 725 12.0 1 268 12.0 1 0 .0 0 -- 406 12.0 1 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type RT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 Phase 1 <* + + + ++ * + v * + G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT 434 24.0 2 Phase 2 v G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% .0 0 \ 1066 24.0 2 322 24.0 2 \ 0 .0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .86 .90 .93 0 .90 .90 .90 0 .90 .92 .88 0 .77 .90 .92 Phase 3 G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% Phase 4 0- Y Y Y 3 0- Y Y Y 3 0- Y Y Y 3 0- Y Y Y 3 Phase 5 / \ North 04/24/97 09:56:21 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES Phasing: SEQUENCE 31 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT 3 3 3 3 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% 3 3 3 3 C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane . Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph vph - vph -- N -RT 725 .86 843 RT 843 1 1.00 843 .00 1.00 N -TH 434 .90 482 TH 482 2 1.05 506 .00 .00 N -LT 0 .93 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -TH 322 .92 350 TH 350 2 1.05 367 .00 .00 S -LT 1066 .88 1211 LT 1211 2 1.03 1247 1.00 .00 W -RT 406 .77 527 RT 527 1 1.00 527 .00 1.00 W -TH 0 .90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -LT 268 .92 291 LT 291 1 1.00 291 1.00 .00 04/24/97 09:56:21 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 'Pip Lane No. Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block.Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 S- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 S- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 W- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 25 Outback. Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 Ap pr ch Lane LT Group Phase Mvts Type Adj Flow Rate vph N- RT 843 N- TH 506 S- TH 367 S- LT Pri. 1247 W- RT W- LT L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Adj Satfl Rate vphg 527. 1 583 Pri. 291 1770 Cycle Length, C 90 sec Lost Time. Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec Flow Ratio v/s Green. Lane Ratio Group g/C Capac vph 1583 .532 .559 886 .951 3725 .136 .234 873 .580 3725 .099 .641 2390 .154 3539 .352 .374 1323 .943 .333 .699 1107 .476 .164 .292 Sum(v /s) = 516 .564 Xc = .948 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Ap pr ch Lane Group Mvts Vol Ratio v/c N- RT .951 N- TH .580 S- TH .154 S- LT .943 W- RT .476 W- LT .564 Cycle= 90" Int Total .725 Green Unif Delay Ratio Delay Fact g/C d1 DF -- sec /v .559 14.2 .234 23.2 . 641 4.9 . 374 20.7 .699 4.6 . 292 20.5 Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph Incr Delay d2 sec /v V/C Ratio v/c .885 Lane Group Delay sec /v Crit Lane Grp 04/24/9.7 09:56:22 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - .85 886 16 14.29 26.4 D+ .85 873 16 .72 20.4 C > 24.1 C .85 2390 16 .00 4.1 A .85 1323 16 9.80 27.4 D+ > 22.1 C .85 1107 16 .26 4.2 A .85 516 16 1.08 18.5 C+ > 9.3 B+ > 20.1 C Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 31 I Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 * * / ** / North AdjVol: vph -Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del :s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft <* + + + ++ * + v * + G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% * * <* MVMT TOTALS N Approach 'Param:Units RT TH LT D+ C .95 .58 31.0 31.5 109 66 199 112 19 19 470 245 G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% N Approach 1349 C .81 31.2 175 311 38 470 v .00 .00 .0 .0 0 0 0 0 G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% E Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT 843 506 0 0 0 0 0 367 1247 527 12/1 24/2 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 56 19 0 0 0 0 0 15 38 39 56 23 0 0 0 0 0 64 37 70 886 873 0 0 0 0 0 2390 1323 1107 A D+ .00 .00 .00 .15 .94 .0 .0 .0 6.6 44.9 0 0 0 10 233 0 0 0 36 301 0 0 0 0 0 7 39 8 0 0 0 0 0 83 494 201 E Approach 0 .00 .0 0 0 0 S Approach S Approach 1614 C .76 36.2 243 337 0 46 494 W Approach Int RT TH LT Total 0 291 3781 0/0 12/1 0 23 0 29 0 516 7095 A C+ .48 .00 .56 7.4 .0 29.4 16 0 36 59 0 62 B+ .51 15.2 52 121 04/24/97 09:56:22 C .73 29.9 470 769 0 10 102 0 261 494 Int W Approach Total 818 3781 C .73 29.9 470 769 18 102 261 494 3i Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 325 12.0 1 0 .0 0 493 12.0 1 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. - % RT / North <* + + + ++ * + v * + 880 12.0 1 G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% / i N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO * * <* 527 24.0 2 v G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% .0 0 1294 24.0 2 TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT 391 24.0 2 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type 0 0 .86 .90 .93 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0 0 .90 .92 .88 0 0 .77 .90 .92 G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% 0- 0- 0- Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y / \ North. Y 3 Y 3 Y 3 Y 3 07/18/97 13:02:05 Area Location Type:.NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES Phasing: SEQUENCE 31 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT 3 3 3 3 Sq 31 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 * * / ** G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% 3 3 3 3 C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 0032 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes vph -- vph -- vph - N -RT 880 .86 1023 RT 1023 N -TH 527 .90 586 TH 586 N -LT 0 .93 0 0 S -RT 0 .90 0 S -TH 391 .92 425 S -LT 1294 .88 1470 W -RT 493 .77 640 W -TH 0 .90 0 W -LT 325 .92 353 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Lane Adj Prop.of Util Flow LT RT vph 1 1.00 1023 .00 1.00 2 1.05 615 .00 .00 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 TH 425 2 1.05 446 .00 .00 LT 1470 2 1.03 1514 1.00 .00 RT 640 1 1.00 640 .00 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 LT 353 1 1.00 353 1.00 .00 07/18/97 13:02:06 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of ' Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 S- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 S- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 W- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 0033 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj pr Group Phase Flow ch Mvts Type Rate -- vph N- RT 1023 N- TH 615 Ap . pr ch S- TH 446 S- LT Pri. 1514 W- RT 640 W- LT Pri. 353 N- N- S- TH. S- LT W- W- Lane Group Mvts Vol Ratio v/c RT 1.155 TH .704 RT .578 LT .683 Adj Satfl Rate vphg Cycle Length, C 90 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, . L 6.0 sec Flow Ratio v/s 1583 .646 3725 .165 3725 .120 3539 .428 Green Unif Delay Ratio Delay Fact g/C d1 DF -- sec /v . 559 15.1 .85 . 234 24.0 .85 .187 .641 5.0 .85 1.144 .374 21.4@ .85 . 699 5.2 .85 .292 21.4 .85 Green Lane Ratio Group g/C Capac -- vph . 559 886 1.155 .234 873 .704 . 641 2390 .187 .374 1323 1.144 1583 .404 .699 1107 .578 1770 .199 .292 517 .683 Sum(v /s) = 1.074 Xc.= 1.151 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service. Worksheet Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph 2390 Incr Delay d2 sec /v 886 16 84.46 873 16 1.81 16 .00 1323 16 70.64@ 1107 16 .57 517 1.6 2.56 V/C Ratio. v/c Lane Group Delay sec /v Crit Lane Grp 07/18/97 13:02:06. Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS sec /v - 97.3 F 22.2 C > 69.1 F 4.3 A 88.8@ F > 69.6@ F 5.0 A 20.8 C > 10.6 B Cycle= 90" @ expect more delay due to extreme v /c's (see EVALUATE) Int Total .880 > 56.7@ E 0034 AdjVol: vph - Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s/v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF = .0% 54 24 1360 298 78 1360 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 31 1 Phase 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 * * / ** / � North <* + + + + ++ * + + v * + G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% + + ++ v G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y+R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int " Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 1023 615 0 0 0 0 0 446 1514 640 0 353 4591 12/1 24/2 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 66 21 0 0 0 0 0 17 45 45 0 26 56 23 0 0 0 0 0 64 37 70 0 29 886 873 0 0 0 0 0 2390 1323 1107 0 517 7096 F C 1.15 .70 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 82.5 33.4 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 352 86 0 0 0 0 0 255 141 0 0 0 0 0 APPR TOTALS Param:Units N Approach E Approach AdjVol: vph 1638 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 89 10 0 12 197 0 0 0 0 0 101 1128 244 0 316 1360 F F B E .99 .00 .93 .62 .88 64.1 .0 67.3 16.9 55.3 438 0 550 70 1058 396 0 423 159 978 0 0 07/18/97 13:02:06 A F A C E .19 1.14 .58 .00 .68 .88 6.7 85.2 8.6 .0 32.0 55.3 13 537 23 0 47 1058 45 378 81 0 78 978 Int S Approach W Approach Total 1960 993 4591 97 22 197 1128 316 1360 003 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 N E, W Sq 31 * * / ** /\ North 880 12.0 1 325 12.0 1 0 .0 0 -- 498 12.0 1 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. - % RT 533 24.0 2 . 0. 2.0 2.0 2.0 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 . 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 . 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 <* + + + ++ * + v * + G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% * * <* v G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% .0 0 \ \ 1299 24.0 2 393 24.0 2 TH LT.Loc Nm Nb RT G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 .0 0 NO 0 0 .86 .90 .93 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 NO 0 0 .90 .92 .88 NO 0 0 .77 .90 .92 07/18/97 13:19:58 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key:. VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES / \ North Phasing: SEQUENCE 31 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT 0- Y Y Y 3 0- Y Y Y 3 0- Y Y Y. 3 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 3 3 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% 3 3 3 3 C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 36 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate .Group. Flow Lanes .Util Flow LT RT vph vph -- vph - vph -- - -. N -RT 880 .86 1023 RT 1023 1 1.00 1023 .00 1.00 N -TH 533 .90 592 TH 592 2 1.05 622 .00 .00 N -LT 0 .93 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -TH 393 .92 427 TH 427 2 1.05 448 .00 .00 S -LT 1299 .88 1476 LT 1476 2 1.03 1520 1.00 .00 W -RT 498 .77 647 RT 647 1 1.00 647 .00 1.00 W -TH 0 .90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 ..00 .00 W -LT 325 .92 353 LT 353 1 1.00 353 1.00 .00 07/18/97 13:19:58 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 'Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 S- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 S- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.01:000 .950 1.00 3539 W- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Ap pr Lane Group Mvts N- RT N- TH S- TH S- LT W- RT W- LT LT Phase Type Adj Flow Rate vph Adj Satfl Rate vphg Cycle Length, C 90 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec Flow Ratio v/s 1023 1583 .646 622 3725 .167 647 1583 .409 Pri. 353 1770 .199 Analysis Worksheet Green Ratio g/C Lane Group Capac vph .559 886 1.155 .234 873 .712 448 3725 .120 .641 2390 .187 Pri. 1520 3539 .429 .374 1323 1.149 .699 1107 .584 .292 517 .683 Sum(v /s) = 1.076 Xc = 1.152 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Ap Lane pr. Group ch Mvts Vol Ratio v/c Green Unif Delay Ratio Delay Fact g/C d1 DF -- sec /v N- RT 1.155 .559 15.1 .85 N- TH .712 .234 24.1 .85 S- TH .187 .641 5.0 .85 S- LT 1.149 .374 21.4@ .85 W- RT .584 .699 5.2 .85 W- LT .683 .292 21.4 .85 Cycle= 90" @ expect more delay due to Int Total .883 Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph - V/C Ratio v/c Incr Lane Delay Group d2 Delay sec /v sec /v Crit Lane Grp 886 16 84.46 97.3 F 873 16 1.92 22.4 C 2390 16 .00 4.3 A 1323 16 70.64@ 88.8@ F 1107 16 .59 5.0 B+ 517 16 2.56 20.8 C extreme v /c's (see EVALUATE) 07/18/97 13 :19:59 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - 69.0 F 69.6@ F 10.6 B 56.6@ E 0038 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 31 Phase 1 * * / ** / \ North <* + + + ++ * + v * + G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% * * <* V G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% MVMT TOTALS N Approach -Param:Units RT TH LT AdjVol: vph .Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param :Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft 1023 622 12/1 24/2 66 21 56 23 886 873 F C 1.15 .71 82.5 33.6 352 87 255 143 54 24 0 1 360 301 0 N Approach 1645 F .99 64.0 439 398 78 1360 Phase 2 I Phase 3 * * <* G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% E Approach S Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT 0 0 0 0 0 448 1520 647 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0 0 0 0 0 17 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 64 37 70 0 0 0 0 0 2390 1323 1107 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E Approach 0 .00 .0 0 0 0 0 A F .19 1.15 6.7 86.5 13 548 46 380 0 0 8 91 10 0 0 102 1147 246 S Approach 1968 F .93 68.3 561 426 07/18/97 13:19:59 Ped= .0 sec = .0% W Approach Int RT TH LT Total B+ .58 8.7 23 82 0 353 4613 0/0 12/1 0 26 0 29 0 517 7096 C E .00 .68 .88 .0 32.0 55.6 0 47 1070 0 78 984 B .62 16.9 70 160 0 12 199 0 316 1360 Int W Approach Total 1000 4613 E .88 55.6 1070 984 0039 99 22 199 1147 316 1360 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway. Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - / 157 12.0 1 5 .0 0 .0 0 89 12.0 1 -- LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. Sq 11 * * / ** / \ North Phase 1 G /C= .449 G= 27.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 911 24.0 2 v + + ++ v + + + +> + + ++ G /C= .417 G= 25.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =51.6% 45 12.0 1 + / 243 12.0 1 0 .0 0 776 24.0 2 \ 52 .0 0 /. 71 .0 0 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 0 12.0 1 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES / \ North 04/24/97 10:16:06 Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type $ RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT . N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .81 .90 .84 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .80 .95 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .50 .66 .58 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% 40 C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph - vph -- vph - vph N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 911 .88 1035 TH 1035 2 1.05 1087 .00 .00 N -LT 45 .93 48 LT 48 1 1.00 48 1.00 .00 E -RT 52 .81 64 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -TH 0 .90 0 TH +RT 64 1 1.00 64 .00 1.00 E -LT 243 .84 289 LT 289 1 1.00 289 1.00 .00 S -RT 71 .80 89 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -TH 776 .95 817 TH +RT 906 2 1.05 951 .00 .10 S -LT 0 .90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -RT 5 .50 10 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -TH 89 .66 135 TH +RT 145 1 1.00 145 .00 .07 W -LT 157 .58 271 LT 271 1 1.00 271 1.00 .00 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 04/24/97 10:16:07 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .143 1.00 266 E- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .657 1.00 1224 S- TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .985 1.000 1.00 3671 W- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .990 1.000 1.00 1843 W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 41 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Input /Calculation C - Cycle Length G - Actual Green Time g - Effective Green Time go - Opp. Effective Green Time N - Number of Lanes No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate PLT - Proportion of LT PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate tL - Lost Time LTC - Left Turns per Cycle Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio gf - First LT Effect. Green qro - Opposing Queue Ratio gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green fs - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) PL - Proportion of LT (9 -17) n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) EL1 - TH Equivalent for LT EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) £min - Minimum Value for fLT fm - LT Factor for LT (9 -17) fLT - LT Factor for Lane Group N -LT 60.0000 26.9690 27.9690 27.9690 1.0000 2.0000 48.0000 1.0000 .0000 951.0000 3.0000 .8000 7.9250 1.0000 .0000 . 5339 8.4992 19.4697 .2806 1.0000 4.2496 1.0000 5.6855 .0000 . 1430 .1430 . 1430 Approach E -LT S -LT 60.0000 25.0310 26.0310 26.0310 1.0000 1.0000 289.0000 1.0000 . 0000 145.0000 3.0000 4.8167 2.4167 1.0000 . 0000 . 5661 . 0000 26.0310 . 7844 1.0000 . 0000 1.0000 1 .5213 . 0000 . 1537 .6574 . 6574 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 04/24/97 10:16:07 W -LT .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter.Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] Ap pr N- N- Lane Group Mvts LT Phase Type TH 1087 LT Pri. 48 E- TH +RT 64 E- LT Pri. 289 S- TH +RT 951 W- TH +RT 145 W- LT Pri. 271 Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet 'Ap • pr ch N- N- Lane Group Mvts Vol Ratio v/c Cycle= 60" Int Total .530 Adj Flow Rate vph Green Ratio g/C TH .626 .466 LT .387 .466 E -• TH +RT .093 .434 E- LT .544 .434 S- TH +RT .556 .466 W- TH +RT .181 .434 W- LT .353 .434 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Adj Satfl Rate vphg 3725 .292 .466 1737 .626 266 .180 .466 124 .387 1583 .040 .434 687 .093 1224 .236 .434 531 .544 3671 .259 .466 1711 .556 1843 .079 .434 800 .181 1770 .153 .434 768 .353 Unif Delay Delay Fact d1 DF sec /v Flow Ratio v/s Green Ratio g/C Sum(v /s) = .528 Xc = .586 Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph Lane Group Capac vph Incr Delay d2 sec /v V/C Ratio v/c Lane Group Delay sec /v Crit Lane Grp * 04/24/97 10:16:08 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - 9.2 .85 1737 16 .52 8.3 B+ 7.9 .85 124 16 1.02 7.8 B+ > 8.3 B+ 7.6 .85 687 16 .00 6.5 B+ 9.6 .85 531 16 .90 9.0 B+ > 8.6 B+ 8.8 .85 1711 16 .31 7.8 B+ > 7.8 B+ 7.9 .85 800 16 .01 6.8 B+ 8.6 .85 768 16 .12 7.5 B+ > 7.2 B+ > 8.0 B+ 43 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 11 1 Phase 1 Phase 2 * * / ** North MVMT TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft G /C= .449 G= 27.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .417 G= 25.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =51.6% C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% N Approach RT TH LT 0 1087 0/0 24/2 12/1 0 31 0 0 47 47 0 1737 119 B+ B+ .00 .63 .39 .0 13.1 18.9 0 59 4 0 205 8 0 19 1 0 245 25 N Approach B+ .62 13.3 63 213 20 245 E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 64 0 289 93 858 0 10 135 271 2855 0/0 12/1 12/1 0/0 24/2 0/0 0/0 12/1 12/1 0 7 28 0 28 0 0 11 19 0 43 43 0 47 0 0 43 43 0 687 531 0 1711 0 0 800 768 6353 B+ 8+ .00 .09 .54 .0 10.3 15.6 0 3 19 0 9 54 0 1 5 0 31 138 E Approach 1135 353 951 416 2855 B+ .46 14.6 22 63 6 138 B+ .00 .56 .0 12.4 0 49 0 171 0 17 0 0 3 5 51 0 214 0 0 69 129 245 S Approach 8+ .56 12.4 49 171 17 214 8+ B+ .00 .00 .18 .35 .0 .0 10.9 12.4 0 0 7 14 0 0 22 45 Int W Approach Total B+ .29 11.9 21 67 8 129 04/24/97 10:16:08 B+ .53 13.0 155 514 B+ .53 13.0 155 514 4 4 51 245 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow. Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- vph -- vph vph - vph -- N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 1106 .88 1257 TH 1257 2 1.05 1320 .00 .00 N -LT 55 .93 59 LT 59 1 1.00 591.00 .00 E -RT 63 .81 78 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -TH 0 .90 0 TH +RT 78 1 1.00 78 .00 1.00 E -LT 295 .84 351 LT 351 1 1.00 351 1.00 .00 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 07/18/97 13:10:06 S -RT 86 .80 107 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -TH 942 .95 992 TH +RT 1099 2 1.05 1154 .00 .10 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -RT 6 .50 12 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -TH 108 .66 164 TH +RT 176 1 1.00 176 .00 .07 W -LT 191 .58 329 LT 329 1 1.00 329 1.00 .00 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .143 1.00 266 E- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .600 1.00 1118 S- TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .985 1.000 1.00 3671 W- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .990 1.000 1.00 1844 W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 Outback'Steakhouse - Tukwila I -S Off Mall Entrance on Southcenter. Parkway ,. Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM'Supplemental.LT- Factor Worksheet Input /Calculation C Cycle Length G - Actual Green Time g - Effective Green Time go - Opp. Effective Green Time N - Number of Lanes No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate PLT - Proportion of LT PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate tL - Lost Time LTC - Left Turns per Cycle Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio gf - First LT Effect. Green qro - Opposing Queue Ratio gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green fs - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) PL - Proportion of LT (9 -17) n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) EL1 - TH Equivalent for. LT EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) fmin - Minimum Value for fLT fm - LT Factor for LT (9 -17) fLT - LT Factor for Lane Group N -LT 60.0000 26.9700 27.9700 27.9700 1.0000 2.0000 59.0000 1.0000 .0000 1154.0 3.0000 .9833 9.6167 1.0000 . 0000 .5338 12.1115 15.8585 . 1538 1.0000 6.0557 1.0000 9.4340 ▪ 0000 .1430 .1430 .1430 Approach E -LT_ • S -LT 60.0000 25.0300 26.0300 26.0300 1.0000 1.0000 351.0000 1.0000 . 0000 176.0000 3.0000 5.8500 2.9333 1 .0000 .0000 . 5662 . 6815 25.3485 .7650 1.0000 . 3407 1.0000 1 .6220 . 0000 .1537 . 6004 .6004 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 07/18/97 13 :10:06 0046 W -LT .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 11 * * / ** North MVMT TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph 'Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft Phase 1 G /C= .449 G= 27.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% +> Phase 2 G /C= .417 G= 25.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =51.6% C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% N Approach RT TH LT 0 1320 59 0/0 24/2 12/1 0 37 0 0 47 47 0 1737 119 B+ B+ .00 .76 .48 .0 15.0 22.6 0 83 6 0 273 10 0 23 0 297 N Approach 1379 B+ .75 15.3 89 283 78 0 351 0/0 12/1 12/1 0 8 36 0 43 43 0 687 485 B+ B .00 .11 .72 .0 10.4 20.6 0 3 30 0 12 72 1 0 1 7 27 0 37 168 E Approach 429 B .61 18.7 33 84 112 1042 0/0 24/2 0 33 0 47 0 1711 B+ .00 .67 .0 13.7 0 66 0 225 0 21 0 260 E Approach S Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT S Approach 1154 B+ .67 13.7 66 225 07/18/97 13:10:07 W Approach Int RT TH LT Total 0 12 164 329 3467 0/0 0/0 12/1 12/1 • 0 0 13 22 0 0 43 43 0 0 800 768 6307 B+ B+ .00 .00 .22 .43 .0 .0 11.2 13.2 0 0 8 18 0 0 28 57 B+ .65 14.8 214 677 0 0 3 6 62 0 0 84 157 297 Int W Approach Total 505 3467 B+ B+ .36 .65 12.5 14.8 26 214 85 677 24 8 21 9 62 297 168 260 157 297 0047 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I-5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 Ap pr ch Lane Group Mvts N- TH N- LT S- TH+RT Ap Lane pr Group ch Mvts N- TH N- LT E- TH+RT E- LT • LT Phase Type E- TH+RT E- LT Pri. W- TH+RT W- LT Pri. Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec S- TH+RT .674 W- TH+RT .220 W- LT .428 Cycle= 60" Int Total .650 Vol Green Ratio Ratio v/c g/C L1.4) - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Adj Flow Rate vph Adj Satfl Rate vphg 1320 3725 .354 .466 1737 .760 Pri. 59 266 .221 .466 124 .476 78 1583 .049 .434 687 .114 351 1118 .314 .434 485 .724 1154 3671 .314 .466 1711 .674 176 1844 .095 .434 800 .220 329 1770 .186 .434 768 .428 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Level-of-Service Worksheet .760 .466 10.1 .85 . 476 .466 8.3 .85 Unif Delay Lane Cal Delay Fact Group Term d1 DF Capac sec/v vph - . 114 .434 7.7 .85 687 16 .00 6.5 .724 .434 10.7 .85 485 16 3.65 12.7 . 466 9.5 .85 .434 8.1 .85 . 434 9.0 .85 Flow Ratio v/s Green Ratio g/C Lane Group Capac vph Sum(v/s) = .668 Xc = .742 Incr Delay d2 sec/v V/C Ratio v/c Lane Group Delay sec/v 1737 16 1.41 10.0 124 16 2.18 9.3 1711 16 .75 8.8 800 16 .02 6.9 768 16 .25 7.9 Crit Lane Grp * Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec/v - B+ B+ > 9.9 B+ B+ B > 11.6 B B+ > 8.8 B+ B+ B+ > 7.5 B+ > 9.4 B+ 07/18/97 13:10:07 0048 . • Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - /• North .0 0 1106 24.0 2 . 191 '12.0 1 / + / 295 12.0 1 North 108 12.0 1 -- 6 .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 'Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type - $ RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 81 .90 .84 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 80 .95 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 50 .66 .58 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Sq 11 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5 Phase 6 * * / ** G /C= .449 G= 27.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% + + ++ + + ++ v + + + +> + + ++ v G /C= .417 G= 25.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =51.6% 55 12.0 1 0 . 0 942 24.0 2 63 .0 0 86 .0 0 0 12.0 1 07/18/97 13:10:05 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > 1 WIDTHS v LANES ./ Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 0049 No. Lanes Stop /Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's ( %) SU /RV's ( %) CV's ( %) PCE's Queuing Comments HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611 -2083 Ph: (904) 392 -0378 Streets: (N -S) Southcenter Pkwy (E -W) Site Access Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst Date of Analysis 4/25/97 Other Information Future 2001 Conditions Two -way Stop - controlled Intersection Northbound L T R 0 2 < 0 N 1205 19 .95 .95 0 Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road Southbound L T R 1 2 0 15 .95 1.10 Release 2.1c OTBK- P5.HC0 501 .95 0 N Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow -up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) 5.50 5.50 6.50 7.00 Eastbound L T R 0 0 0 � Page 1 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 5 0 9 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 The level of service analysis indicates that some queuing will take place. On site it will amount to not more than a single vehicle since the 95 percent probability queue length is computed to be 0.2 vehicles which can be rounded up to one (1). In the southbound 2 -way, left turn lane the LOS is at 'C' and the 95 percent probability queue length is computed to be 0.0 vehicles which, for a worst case, can be also rounded up to one (1) although for the majority of the time there will be no vehicles waiting. HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c OTBK- P5.HCO Page.2 I Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: Step 2: LT from Major Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: Step 3: TH from Minor Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1821 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 94 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.95 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 89 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street 644 653 653 0.98 1288 349 349 0.95 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1821 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 73 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.95 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.95 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.95 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 69 WB EB SB NB WB EB WB EB Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec /veh) (veh) (sec /veh) WE L 6 69 > WB T 0 89 > 156 25.7 0.2 D 25.7 WB R 10 653 > SB L 18 349 10.9 0.0 C Intersection Delay = 0.3 sec /veh 0.3 5. Christopher Brown as Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., (Suite A-201 Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 Fax 772-4321 in Tukwila, Washington otbkiin2.doc RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 0 9 1997 PERMIT CENTER Traffic Engineers Transportation Planners DC:11 • 0 lio TABLE OF CONTENTS Traffic Impact Analysis for the Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila. Washington Introduction 1 Purpose 1 Existing Road Network 4 Existing Traffic 4 Population and Traffic Growth 4 Trip Generation , 5 • Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment 5 • Adjacent Land Uses 9 Levels of Service Description 9 Level of Service Analysis 11 Discussion - Mitigating Measures 11 • Conclusions 12 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1, Vicinity Map 2 Figure 2, Site Plan 3 Figure 3, Current Traffic Volumes 6 Figure 4, Future Traffic Volumes Without Project 7 Figure 5, Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment 8 Figure 6, Future Traffic Volumes With Project 10 LIST OF TABLES Table I, Trip Generation 5 Table II, Level of Service Criteria 9 Table III, Results of Level of Service Analysis 11 Christopher Brown a Asiociates 879 12ainier Avenue N.. Suite A-201 Penton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188, Purpose Traffic Impact Analysis for the Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila. Washington Introduction The proposed Outback Steakhouse is a "high- quality, sit down" restaurant and will be located on the east side of Southcenter Parkway approximately 500 feet south of Strander Boulevard in front of the Double Tree Suites hotel. It will have seating for 238 patrons and its hours of operation will be limited to the evenings only. Since such a facility may increase vehicular traffic demands and potentially affect operations of adjacent roads during the p.m. peak hour, it is appropriate to review current and future traffic operations, identify potential impacts, and identify any appropriate mitigation measures. The location of the Outback Steakhouse relative its surroundings is shown in Figure 1, Vicinity Map on the following pave. The purpose of this traffic impact analysis is to: o describe the road system serving the proposed development and assemble a database of current traffic operations; o identify an horizon year by which the proposed Outback Steakhouse development could be constructed and generating traffic; o develop an appropriate population growth rate for the surrounding area and estimate traffic volumes that might reasonably exist in the horizon year; o determine the trip generation rates or the amount of traffic likely to be produced by the development; o identify the primary directions of travel within the subject area and, based on this, assign site generated traffic to the surrounding road network; o compare current traffic operations with what is expected to exist in the future both with and without the proposed development; o identify any roadway capacity or other deficiencies that given construction of the proposed development would necessitate subsequent modification or improvement; o identify roadway improvements currently planned in the vicinity of the project; o determine appropriate mitigation measures to safely accommodate additional site generated traffic and compute fair share mitigation costs. Christopher Brown i Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 '• 7TH 168TH LN ST S ST N 6 N ST 700 S 167TH ST ST ST s Sr ST X14 %Piano 801i lu S N = In F f> cc Al Illil N C SOUTHCENTER PLAT C's COURTYA Z BY MARRIOII? -I M 70 o CORPORAT; d CORPORATE ` _NIBBLER DR S AP PARKWAY/ "'77'"` PLAZA ' -v 9 MI LA Ai TR1L4AND )R • PAVILION MALL 5600 180TH1 w0 T < � i BLVD W el I:1 VI 4 i TRECK 1NN/ d FS SA 2 N DR BLVD /1 4ISrrau rM r .477 oats rru M GRID, (I PAU 181ST ST 2 .1 ..qSu 1' � S. 1 Sr I x - GI NI ,n y 5 tis ?NU vi : 4� �� ,n� ,n, ,� J' c , y ,i + s e .,, [7 Q \ N o $ _ S_ 153RD ImuL � . v �' S 64 0U S 156TH ST \ QU \C � lit:. T£R�_I 3�' _ .1I � � �w CH �—� IH 4400 =) = � ' 1 EY 1 vj CRYSTAL: : *, ?9, , / �T� kwl PKWY SPRIN8S C T . S 160►N v, l t/, N �� PARK a iS9TM P , 1. ST . _ SOUTHCENTER } S ."3t , I R fSTY/ _ 11{{ } I = 161ST \! PARK S1lND�[ST si `^ '�) S 163 iPL r Ny` � h 1� ST v_ l y §,,..._...=.4 §,,..._...=.4 TRANDER 1641HSy60.a ST � �51661N sr S in ' / 168TH 1 I x 26 DR S 164 I m ST1 5100 � 7 2ND 5TH VI 4300 178TH ST S 17� _ISOTN sr 181ST Sr s LAKE PP 178TH IMMO s +I S Z` o. Figure 1, Vicinity Map S ? Y gigs \� a \ s ac. -- ;;" 111 r� 5 solo Emu star L , L K, Christopher brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 3 Christopher Brown CI Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A-201 Qenton. WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 4 Existin2 Road Network The road system serving the proposed Outback Steakhouse primarily includes Southcenter Parkway, Strander Boulevard, Klickitat Drive, and the freeway ramps. Other roads that may carry some site generated traffic include Minkler Boulevard and South 180th Street. Key elements of the roadway network are described as follows: o Southcenter Parkway is a five -lane arterial with a center, two -way, left -turn lane and numerous curb -cuts along its length. It has a posted speed limit of 35 mph is illuminated and has curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. Traffic signals and protected left-turn channelization exist at South 180th Street, the 17500 block, the 16700 block, Minkler Boulevard, Strander Boulevard, and at the I -5 on and off ramps. o Strander Boulevard is a five -lane arterial with a center, two -way, left -turn lane along most of its length. Left -turn channelization exists at intersections and major access drives. Traffic signals and protected left -turn channelization exist at the East Valley Highway (SR -181), Andover Park East, Andover Park West, the south access drive to South Center Mall, and Southcenter Parkway. It has a posted speed limit of 35 mph, is illuminated and has curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. o Minkler Boulevard is a lightly traveled two -lane collector with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. It is illuminated, with curbs and gutters, and sidewalks in places. posted speed limit of 35 mph is illuminated and has curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. Traffic signals and protected left-turn channelization exist at Southcenter Parkway, Andover Park West, and Andover Park East. Existin2 Traffic Current turning movement data for this study was obtained in April of 1997 in clear, dry weather conditions. No adverse weather or other conditions existed that might skew the data. These data are shown in both the level of service computations included in the appendix to this report as well as Figure 3, Current Traffic Volumes on page 6. Population and Traffic Growth Historic traffic volume data was analyzed to identify an historic growth rate in vehicular travel demand. Once determined, this rate was extrapolated to a future horizon year and uniformly applied to existing traffic volumes to estimate expected future volumes. In this study, the horizon year was taken to be the year 2001 since the Outback Steakhouse can reasonably be expected to be constructed, occupied, and generating traffic by this time. Historic traffic volume data made available by Tukwila Department of Public Works staff has been collected and compiled from 12 "control count" stations located throughout the City of Tukwila. Between 1986 and 1996 the annual rate of growth in traffic volumes was 1.5 percent. Taken from the present to the year 2001 this amounts to a compounded overall growth rate of 6.2 percent. Christopher Brown g Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 Year 2001 traffic volumes, shown in Figure 4, Future Traffic Volumes Without Project, were estimated by applying the growth rate to those volumes shown in Figure 3, Current Traffic Volumes. Trip Generation The proposed Outback Steakhouse is a quality restaurant with a turnover rate likely to exceed at least one hour or longer. It will operate only between the hours 4:00 p.m. and midnight. The 5th edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual refers to this kind of facility as a Quality Restaurant and has published trip generation data under land use code (LUC) 831. The trip generation characteristics for the proposed development are given below. Table 1, Trip Generation Time Period Traffic Volumes A. W.D.T. 610 A.M. Inbound N/A A.M. Outbound N/A Noon Inbound N/A . Noon Outbound N/A P.M. Inbound 34 vehicles per hour P.M. Outbound 14 vehicles per hour Note that land use code 831 contains no data on morning or noon -time trip generation. Morning and noon -time trip generation estimates are therefore not included. Their impacts are insignificant and have no effect on subsequent level of service analyses. Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment Given the generally north -south orientation of traffic in the area near the proposed development, the trip distribution is based on the north -south distribution of traffic at the most proximate major intersection, Southcenter Parkway and Strander Boulevard. Site generated traffic was assigned to the surrounding road network using the analogy method. That is, the assignment was based on current turning movement counts at intersections through which 10 or more site generated trips will likely pass. A description of the analogy method is given on pages 54 and 55 of the ITE publication Transportation and Land Development, by Vergil Stover and Frank Koepke. The trip distribution and traffic assignment for the Outback Steakhouse is shown on pages 8 of this report. 5 Christopher Brown i Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 KlIckitat Drive 1-3 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance Strander Boulevard •. • , • *, • 6 Figure 3, Current Traffic Volumes South moth str••t NOT TO SCALE Christopher Brown a Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A-201 Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 Off ftanth Mall Strander Boulevard • - .• • • • •• , Figure 4, Future Traffic Volumes 7 Vithout Project South 180th Street NOT TO SCALE Chrigtopher Brown (it Aaaociatei 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A-201 Renton, WA 98055-L380 (206) 772-1188 Orly• 71, Strander Boulevard I-3 Off Ramp, Mall. Entrance C • 3 Figure 5, Trip Distribution and 3s 8 • I. • • 1. L L MInkler Boulevard tine Assignment South moth Street INI NOT TO SCALE Christopher Brown a Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. (Suite A-201 Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 Adjacent Land Uses Apart from the Double Tree Suites hotel, land uses in the immediate vicinity of the Outback Steakhouse are primarily retail. There are also a variety of restaurants, a professional office building, as station, a major distribution center, and a city park to the east. The proposed Outback Steakhouse is will not introduce any new divergent land uses or land use conflicts. It is a compatible land use. Levels of Service Description Level of service (LOS) describes the quality of traffic flow. Level of service ranges from LOS "A" to LOS "F." LOS "A" retlects ideal driving conditions where one can select speed and change lanes at will and expect delays of less than 5 seconds. LOS "F" represents severely constrained operations characterized by excessive delays. Level of service as a function of delay is shown in Table 11. Table 1I, Level of Service Criteria sets forth the standards by which levels of service are determined. This, along with a detailed discussion on how levels of service are computed is contained in the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209 published by the Transportation Research Board. Table II, Level of Service Criteria Signalized Levels of Service Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A 555.0 B >5.0 and 515.0 C > 15.0 and 525.0 D >25.0 and 540.0 E >40.0 and 560.0 F >60.0 Unsignalized Level of Service Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A 5_5.0 B >5.0 and 510.0 C >10.0 and 520.0 D >20.0 and 530.0 E >30.0 and 545.0 F >45.0 There are several PC based software packages available to compute levels of service. Two programs, the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) and Signal -94, were used in this report. They were developed by the McTrans Center at the University of Florida and Strong Concepts, respectively and are used under license to Christopher Brown & Associates. Outputs from these software packages are included in the appendix of this report. In order to determining the level of service of signalized intersections, one must first have signal timing and phasing information. Signal -94 however, contains a routine by which optimum signal timing and phasing information is computed. Since optimal settings may 9 Christopher Brown Associates 879 Painier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 Mickitat Drive • Strandar Soulovard Figure 6, Future Traffic Volumes 'ith Project 10 South 110th Strut Christopher Brown ( Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. (Suitt A -201 Renton. WA 98055-1380 (206) 772 -1188 not be in effect in actual practice, there may be some difference between actual and computed settings. Such difference however, are typically minor. This notwithstanding, the same signal phasing and timing settings are used in all three of the "Current," "Future Without Project," and "Future With Project" scenarios and thus provide a common basis for comparison. Level of Service Analysis Neither the background growth expected in the vicinity of the proposed Outback Steakhouse nor the development itself are expected to have any significant impact on the adjacent road network through the year 2001. The results of this level of service analysis are tabulated below. Since the Outback Steakhouse will operate during evening hours exclusively, only the p.m. peak hour is included in this analysis. Also, only those intersections through which 10 or more site generated trips would pass are included. Table 111, Results of Level of Service Analysis @ Minkler Boulevard • Strander Boulevard @ Klickitat Drive @ I -5 Off Ramp at Mall Entrance Note that only the intersection at Klickitat Drive will experience a reduction in level of service due to the addition of background growth traffic. However, this reduction is due only to a modest increase in delay of six seconds per vehicle and, of some importance, the LOS "D" is still acceptable. In summary, there will be no adverse traffic flow consequences associated with the full implementation of the Outback Steakhouse development. Increases in traffic will be minimal and the road system as it currently exists is well able to handle the minor, additional traffic. Discussion - Mitigating Measures With the addition of site generated traffic and with no changes in geometry or traffic controls, adequate levels of service and safe traffic operations will continue beyond the year 2001 at all impacted intersections. No need exists to change current roadway geometry or traffic controls. At the project site access to Southcenter Parkway, good levels of service and excellent entering sight distances exist suggesting that no remedial measures are necessary through 11 Signalized Intersections Current 1997 on Southcenter Parkway Conditions LOS Delay LOS Delay B 8 B 8 B 9 B 9 C 20 D 26 B 8 B 8 Year 2001 w/o Project Year 2001 w/ Project LOS Delay B 8 B 9 D 27 Not Impacted Christopher Brown a Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 the year 2001. As currently proposed and with future forecast traffic conditions and roadway geometry, the access will operate very well. It may be discerned that the reason there will be no traffic impacts is that the peak hour of the site does not coincide with that of the arterial and freeway systems. These tend to be in the 3:15 to 4:15 interval essentially before the opening time of the restaurant. Indeed, for this reason no reduction in traffic for "pass -by" trips has been used, rather all site traffic is considered to be associated with "primary" or destination trips. Conclusions The following conclusions may be drawn. 1. The project will generate some 610 vehicular trips per day with 48 of these in the evening peak hour. 2. The inclusion of this project with background traffic growth does not appear to alter the levels of service on the arterial system in the noon and evening peak hours. .3. On the strength of the trip generation data of this study and the assumed distribution based on the analogy method, the project adds little traffic to the key intersections in the area. 4. None of the intersections through which 10 or more site generated trips pass will experience any deterioration in level of service due to the addition of site generated 'traffic. Adequate levels of service are forecast to the horizon year of 2001. 5. Given continued adequate operations at all impacted intersections, no mitigation measures are needed. 6. The existing roadway and associated traffic signal systems are entirely adequate for accommodating site related traffic with no modification or revision being required. 7. The reason the project produces negligible traffic impacts is due to its peak hour demand arriving much later than the peak hour of the street system which tends to be in the 3:15 to 4:15 interval. Essentially, the operation of this restaurant is not coincident with the peak operation of the street system and therefore, there is adequate reserve capacity. 12 Christopher Brown a Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 for the Appendix Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila, Washinaton Capacity and Level of Service Computations along Southcenter Parkway gMinkler Boulevard Current 1997 Conditions 1 Future: 2001 Conditions without Project 6 Future 2001 Conditions with Project 11 tr , Strander Boulevard Current 1997 Conditions 16 .: Future 2001 Conditions without Project 20 Future 2001 Conditions with Project 24 ti Klickitat Drive Current 1997 Conditions 28 Future 2001 Conditions without. Project 32 Future 2001 Conditions with Project 36 @ 1 -5 Off Ramp; Mall Entrance Current 1997 Conditions 40 Future 2001 Conditions without Project 45 @ Site Access / On Site Queuing 50 • • utback Steakhouse - Tukwila inkier Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway urrent 1997 Conditions IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet ntersection # 0 - CSTTIME = 3.0 sec. / forth 0 .0 0 0 12.0 1 36 .0 0 G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 0 .0 0 615 24.0 2 v G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% 48 12.0 1 \ \ 0 .0 0 648 24.0 2 \ 90 .0 0 / 0 12.0 1 / 55 .0 0 North 18 .0 0 04/24/97 09:29:35 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD .ppr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .66 .50 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .70 .90 .65 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .66 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 ;q 21 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 I Phase 5 * / ** + + ++ v G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 01 • ti )utback Steakhouse - Tukwila Iinkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway :urrent 1997 Conditions :IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet .ppr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - vph N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 615 .66 932 TH 932 2 1.05 979 .00 .00 N -LT 48. .50 96 LT 96 1 1.00 96 1.00 .00 E -RT 90 .70 129 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -TH 0 .90 0 LT +TH +RT 214 1 1.00 214 .40 .60 E -LT 55 .65 85 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -RT 18 .64 28 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -TH 648 .66 982 TH +RT 1010 2 1.05 1060 .00 .03 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -RT 36 .64 56 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -TH 0 .90 0 TH +RT 56 1 1.00 56 .00 1.00 W -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 04/24/97 09:29:35 ;IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet kp Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj )r Group Ideal of -- Sat - ;h Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 E- LT +TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .819 .890 1.00 1357 S- TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .996 1.000 1.00 3710 W- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .765 1.000 1.00 1425 0 )utback Steakhouse - Tukwila linkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway :urrent 1997 Conditions ;IGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Approach N -LT E -LT S -LT :nput /Calculation - Cycle Length - Actual Green Time - Effective Green Time to - Opp. Effective Green Time l - Number of Lanes Jo - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) rLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate ALT - Proportion of LT ?Lao - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) �o - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate :L - Lost Time ,TC - Left Turns per Cycle lolc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle tpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio jf - First LT Effect. Green In? - Opposing Queue Ratio ;q - Opp. Queue Effect. Green ;u - Unsaturated Effect. Green - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) ?L - Proportion of LT (9 -17) - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) ?THo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) 3L1 - TH Equivalent for LT 3L2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) :min - Minimum Value for fLT °m - LT Factor for LT (9 -17) =LT - LT Factor for Lane Group 3IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] 'p Dr :h N- N- Lane Group Mvts LT Phase Type Adj Flow Rate vph TH 979 LT Pri. 96 E- LT +TH +RT 214 S- TH +RT 1060 W- TH +RT 56 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Adj Satfl Rate vphg Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Flow Ratio v/s .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 Green Ratio g/C 60.0000 15.8802 16.8802 16.8802 1 .0000 1.0000 85.0000 .3972 .0000 56.0000 3.0000 1.4167 .9333 1.0000 2.4435 .7187 . 3032 14.4367 .8400 .3972 .0000 1.0000 1.3720 . 0000 . 1655 .8899 . 8899 Lane Group Capac vph V/C Ratio v/c 3725 .263 .619 2305 .425 1770 .054 .142 251 .382 1357 .158 .281 382 .560 3710 .286 .427 1584 .669 1425 .039 .281 401 .140 Sum(v /s) = .498 Xc = .585 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 Crit Lane Grp * * 04/24/97 09:29:36 W -LT . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 03 utback. Steakhouse - Tukwila inkier Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway urrent 1997 Conditions IGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level-of-Service Worksheet p Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan r Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr h Mvts v/c g/C d1 DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- sec/v vph sec/v sec/v sec/v N- TM .425 .619 4.5 .85 2305 16 .08 3.9 A N- LT .382 .142 17.8 .85 251 16 .49 15.6 C+ > 4.9 A E-LT+TH+RT .560 .281 14.0 .85 382 16 1.41 13.3 B > 13.3 B S- TH+RT .669 .427 10.5 .85 1584 16 .78 9.7 B+ > 9.7 B+ TH+RT .140 .281 12.3 .85 401 16 .01. 10.4 B > 10.4 B W- , :ycle= 60" nt Total .536 > 7.9 B+ 04 71: WIX.Vi61^P. r. ^u' :G:TNKw,Y+.Mn4twwuw . t utback Steakhouse - Tukwila inkier Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway urrent 1997 Conditions IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection. Performance q 21 I Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 * / ** / `orth IVMT TOTALS iaram:Units ,djVol: vph ►id /Ln:ft /# r/C Rqd @C:% r/C Used: % :V @E: vph rvc Lvi:LOS )eg Sat:v /c ,vg Del:s /v 'ot Del:min Stops:veh lax Que:veh lax Que: ft ,PPR TOTALS 'aram:Units ,djVol: vph ;vc Lvl:LOS )eg Sat:v /c ►vg Del:s/v 'ot Del:min Stops:veh lax Que:veh lax Que: ft G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% v G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% N Approach RT TH LT 0/0 24/2 12/1 0 28 8 0 62 14 0 2305 251 A C+ .00 .43 .38 .0 6.4 25.7 0 26 10 0 127 22 0 12 3 0 157 69 N Approach 1075 A .42 8.1 36 149 + + ++ v G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y+R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% B B+ .00 .56 .00 .00 .67 .0 22.1 .0 .0 15.0 0 20 0 0 66 0 46 0 0 213 0 5 0 0 20 0 130 0 0 256 214 B .56 22.1 20 46 1060 B+ .67 15.0 66 213 04/24/97 09:29:37 E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 129 0 85 29 1031 0 56 0 0 2405 0/0 12/1 0/0 0/0 24/2 0/0 0/0 12/1 0/0 0 20 0 0 30 0 0 6 0 0 28 0 0 43 0 0 28 0 0 382 0 0 1584 0 0 401 0 4923 15 5 20 157 130 256 B B+ .00 .00 .14 .00 .54 .0 .0 16.8 .0 12.6 0 0 4 0 126 0 0 10 0 418 0 0 1 0 41 0 0 34 0 256 Int E Approach S Approach W Approach Total 56 B .14 16.8 4 10 2405 B+ .54 12.6 126 418 1 41 34 256 05 ,itback Steakhouse - Tukwila inkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway .iture 2001 Conditions w/o Project IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet ntersection # 0 - q 21 * / ** / orth 0 .0 0 0 12.0 1 -- 38 .0 0 OSTTIME = 3.0 sec. G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% .0 0 653 24.0 2 v Phase 2 G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% 51 12.0 1 .0 0 + + ++ v \ 96 .0 0 0 12.0 1 / 58 .0 0 / 688 19 24.0 .0 2 0 Phase 3 Phase 4 G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES / North 04/24/97 09:26:51 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD ppr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .66 .50 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .70 .90 .65 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .66 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 06 utback Steakhouse - Tukwila (inkier Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway 'uture 2001 Conditions w/o Project IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet .ppr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - vph N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 653 .66 989 TH 989 2 1.05 1038 .00 .00 N -LT 51 .50 102 LT 102 1 1.00 102 1.00 .00 E -RT 96 .70 137 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -TH 0 .90 0 LT +TH +RT 226 1 1.00 226 .39 .61 E -LT 58 .65 89 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -RT 19 .64 30 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -TH 688 .66 1042 TH +RT 1072 2 1.05 1126 .00 .03 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -RT 38 .64 59 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -TH 0 .90 0 TH +RT 59 1 1.00 59 .00 1.00 W -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 04/24/97 09:26:52 ;IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet ►p Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj )r Group Ideal of Sat - :h Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 E- LT +TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .818 .885 1.00 1349 S- TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .996 1.000 1.00 3710 W- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .765 1.000 1.00 1425 07 utback Steakhouse - Tukwila inkier Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway uture 2001 Conditions w/o Project IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Approach N -LT E -LT S -LT nput /Calculation - Cycle Length - Actual Green Time - Effective Green Time o - Opp. Effective Green Time - Number of Lanes o - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) LT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate LT - Proportion of LT LTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) o - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate L - Lost,:.Time TC - Left Turns per Cycle olc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle Do - Opposing Platoon Ratio f - First LT Effect. Green ro - Opposing Queue Ratio q - Opp. Queue Effect. Green u - Unsaturated Effect. Green s - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) •L - Proportion of LT (9 -17) - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) THo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) ,L1 - TH Equivalent for LT ,L2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) 'min - Minimum Value for fLT m - LT Factor for LT (9 -17) 'LT - LT Factor for Lane Group IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] ,p )r :h N- N- Lane Group Mvts LT Phase Type Adj Flow Rate vph TH 1038 LT Pri. 102 E- LT +TH +RT 226 S- TH +RT 1126 W- TH +RT 59 Adj Satfl Rate vphg ;ycle Length, C 60 sec Jost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Flow Ratio v/s .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 Green Ratio .g /C 60.0000 15.8802 16.8802 16.8802 1.0000 1.0000 89.0000 .3938 . 0000 59.0000 3.0000 1.4833 .9833 1 .0000 2.2751 . 7187 .4372 14.6050 .8381 .3938 .0000 1.0000 1.3893 . 0000 .1651 .8850 . 8850 HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Lane Group Capac vph V/C Ratio v/c 3725 .279 .619 2305 .450 1770 .058 .142 251 .406 1349 .168 .281 379 .596 3710 .304 .427 1584 .711 1425 .041 .281 401 .147 Sum(v /s) = .529 Xc = .622 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 Crit Lane Grp * * 04/24/97 09:26:52 W -LT . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 06 utback Steakhouse - Tukwila inkier Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway uture 2001 Conditions w/o Project IGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM p Lane r Group h Mvts N- TH N- LT E-LT+TH+RT s- w- :ycle= 60 .ht Total Vol Ratio v/c .596 TH+RT .711 TH+RT .147 .450 .619 4.6 .85 .406 .142 17.8 .85 .569 Green Unif Ratio Delay g/C d1 sec/v .281 14.1 .427 10.7 .281 12.3 Delay Fact DF .85 Level-of-Service Worksheet Lane Cal Group Term Capac ill vph 2305 251 1584 16 16 16 Incr Delay d2 sec/v .10 .61 1.06 Lane Group Delay sec/v 4.0 15.8 . 85 379 16 1.85 13.9 10.2 . 85 401 16 .01 10.5 Lan Grp LOS A C+ B B B 5.1 13.9 10.2 10.5 04/24/97 09:26:52 Appr Appr Delay LOS sectv - B B B > 8.2 B+ 09 B+ • utback Steakhouse - Tukwila inkier Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway uture 2001 Conditions w/o Project IGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance q 21 1 */** / orth VMT TOTALS aram:Units vph 'id/Ln:ft/# /C Rqd@C:% /C Used: % V @E: vph vc Lvl:LOS 'eg Sat:v/c .vg Del:s/v 'ot Del:min Stops:veh lax Que:veh lax Que: ft ,PPR TOTALS 'aram:Units vph :vc Lvl:LOS )eg Sat:v/c mg Del:s/v 'ot Del:min Stops:veh lax Que:veh lax Que: ft G/C= .125 G= 7.5" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% Phase 2 G/C= .410 G= 24.6" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=19.2% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y=12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% N Approach RT TH LT 0 1038 102 • 0/0 24/2 12/1 0 29 9 0 62 14 0 2305 251 A C+ .00 .45 .41 .0 6.6 26.0 0 28 11 0 137 23 0 13 3 0 167 74 N Approach 1140 B+ .45 8.3 39 160 Phase 3 + + + + G/C= .265 G= 15.9" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=66.9% E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 137 0 89 32 1094 0 59 0 0 2551 0/0 12/1 0/0 0/0 24/2 0/0 0/0 12/1 0/0 0 21 0 0 32 0 0 7 0 0 28 0 0 43 0 0 28 0 0 379 0 0 1584 0 0 401 0 4920 B 00 .60 .0 22.9 0 22 0 49 0 5 0 0 22 0 137 0 0 272 E Approach 226 B .60 22.9 22 49 B B .00 .00 .71 .00 .00 .15 .0 .0 15.6 .0 .0 16.9 0 0 73 0 0 4 0 0 232 0 0 11 B .71 15.6 73 232 04/24/97 09:26:53 B+ .00 .57 .0 13.0 0 138 0 452 0 0 1 0 44 0 0 36 0 272 Int S Approach W Approach Total 1126 59 2551 B B+ .15 .57 16.9 13.0 4 138 11 452 16 5 22 1 44 167 137 272 36 272 10 .itback Steakhouse - Tukwila inkier Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway .iture 2001 Conditions IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet ntersection # 0 q 21 * / ** / orth 0 .0 0 0 12.0 1 -- 38 ' .0 0 OSTTIME = 3.0 sec. G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 657 24.0 2 1 0 .0 0 / + ppr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .66 .50 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .70 .90 .65 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .66 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Phase 2 v G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% 52 12.0 1 \ \ 1 0 705 .0 24.0 0 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 + + ++ v * * ** G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% 19 .0 04/24/97 09:23:15 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES \ 98 .0 0 / \ 0 12.0 1 / 58 .0 0 North Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0 "• G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% utback Steakhouse - Tukwila inkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway uture 2001 Conditions IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet ppr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - vph N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 657 .66 995 TH 995 2 1.05 1045 .00 .00 N -LT 52 .50 104 LT 104 1 1.00 104 1.00 .00 E -RT 98 .70 140 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -TH 0 .90 0 LT +TH +RT 229 1 1.00 229 .39 .61 E -LT 58 .65 89 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -RT 19 .64 30 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -TH 705 .66 1068 TH +RT 1098 2 1.05 1153 .00 .03 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -RT 38 .64 59 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -TH 0 .90 0 TH +RT 59 1 1.00 59 .00 1.00 W -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 04/24/97 09:23:15 IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet p Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj r Group Ideal of Sat - h Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow - -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 E- LT +TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .817 .886 1.00 1350 S- TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .996 1.000 1.00 3710 W- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .765 1.000 1.00 1425 ' utback Steakhouse - Tukwila inkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway uture 2001 Conditions IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Approach N -LT E -LT S -LT nput /Calculation - Cycle Length - Actual Green Time - Effective Green Time o - Opp. Effective Green Time - Number of Lanes o - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) LT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate LT - Proportion of LT LTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) o - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate L - Lost Time TC - Left Turns per Cycle olc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle po - Opposing Platoon Ratio f - First LT Effect. Green ro - Opposing Queue Ratio q - Opp. Queue Effect. Green u - Unsaturated Effect. Green s - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) L - Proportion of LT (9 -17) - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) THo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) ,L1 - TH Equivalent for LT ;L2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) min - Minimum Value for fLT - LT Factor for LT (9 -17) 'LT - LT Factor for Lane Group ;IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] ,p 1r :h N- N- Lane Group Mvts LT Phase Type Adj Flow Rate vph TH 1045 LT Pri. 104 E- LT +TH +RT 229 S- TH +RT 1153 W- TH +RT 59 Adj Satfl Rate vphg ;ycle Length, C 60 sec Jost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Flow Ratio v/s .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 Green Ratio g/C 60.0000 15.8802 16.8802 16.8802 1.0000 1.0000 89.0000 .3886 . 0000 59.0000 3.0000 1.4833 .9833 1.0000 2.2751 . 7187 .4372 14.6050 .8381 . 3886 .0000 1.0000 1 .3893 . 0000 . 1645 .8863 .8863 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Lane Group Capac vph V/C Ratio v/c 3725 .280 .619 2305 .453 1770 .059 .142 251 .414. * 1350 .170 .281 380 .603 * 3710 .311 .427 1584 .728 * 1425 .041 .281 401 .147 Sum(v /s) = .539 Xc = .634 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 Crit Lane Grp 04/24/97 09:23:16 W -LT .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 13 p , Lane r. Group h Mvts N - N - utback Steakhouse - Tukwila inkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway uture 2001 Conditions IGNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 TH LT Vol Ratio v/c .453 .414 E-LT+TH+RT .603 S- TH+RT .728 w- yc].e= 60 nt Total TH+RT .147 .281 12.3 .580 L1.4] - HCM Level-of-Service Worksheet Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Ratio Delay Fact Group Term' g/C d1 DF Capac m -- sec/v vph - 619 4.6 :142 17.8 . 281 14.2 . 85 .85 ▪ 85 . 427 10.9 .85 2305 251 380 1584 16 16 16 Incr Delay d2 sec/v .10 .66 1.93 16 1.21 Lane Group Delay sec/v 4.0 15.8 14.0 1 0.4 .85 401 16 .01 10.5 Lan Grp LOS A C+ B B B 04/24/97 09:23:16 i Appr Appr Delay LOS sec/v - 5.1 14.0 10.4 10.5 > 8.4 B+ B B B B+ r utback Steakhouse - Tukwila :inkier Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway uture 2001 Conditions IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance q 21 I Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 * / ** / \ orth IVMT TOTALS 'aram:Units 1djVol: vph lid /Ln:ft /# r/C Rqd @C:% r/C Used: % Of @E: vph Ivc Lvl:LOS )eg Sat:v /c ►vg Del:s /v 'ot Del:min `• Stops:veh lax Que:veh lax Que: ft ►PPR TOTALS 'aram:Units idjVol: vph G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% v G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% ;vc Lvl:LOS )eg Sat:v /c ovg Del:s/v ?ot Del:min Stops:veh lax Que:veh lax Que: ft N Approach RT TH LT 0 1045 10 0/0 24/2 12/1 0 30 9 0 62 14 0 2305 251 A C+ .00 .45 .41 .0 6.6 26.1 0 29 11 0 138 24 0 13 3 0 168 75 N Approach 1149 B+ .45 8.4 40 162 16 168 + + ++ v G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 140 0 89 32 1121 0 59 0 0 2590 0/0 12/1 0/0 0/0 24/2 0/0 0/0 12/1 0/0 0 21 0 0 32 0 0 7 0 0 28 0 0 43 0 0 28 0 0 380 0 0 1584 0 0 401 0 4921 B .00 .60 .0 23.0 0 22 0 50 0 5 0 139 E Approach 229 B .60 23.0 22 50 139 B .00 .00 .73 .0 .0 15.9 0 0 76 0 0 240 1153 B .73 15.9 76 240 5 22 279 B 00 .00 .15 .0 .0 16.9 0 0 4 0 0 11 59 B .15 16.9 4 11 04/24/97 09:23:16 B+ .00 .58 .0 13.2 0 142 0 463 0 0 22 0 0 1 0 44 0, 0 279 0 0 36 0 279 Int S Approach W Approach Total 2590 B+ .58 13.2 142 463 1 44 36 279 15 utback Steakhouse - Tukwila trander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway urrent 1997 Conditions IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet ntersection # 0 - 0 .0 0 / + / 279 24.0 2 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 -- 0 .0 0 1OSTTIME = 3.0 sec. .ppr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .89 .90 .77 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .88 .88 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 ;q 21 . * / ** / forth + + + + * * ** + +> v G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 665 24.0 2 v Phase 1 Phase 2 G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1 % 385 24.0 2 \ 0 .0 0 841 24.0 2 \ 547 12.0 1 G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% 294 12.0 1 0 .0 0 Phase 3 Phase 4 / \ North 04/24/97 09:45:05 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% �V utback Steakhouse - Tukwila trander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway urrent 1997 Conditions IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet ppr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - vph N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 665 .88 756 TH 756 2 1.05 794 .00 .00 N -LT 385 .93 414 LT 414 2 1.03 426 1.00 .00 E -RT 547 .89 615 RT 615 1 1.00 615 .00 1.00 E -TH 0 .90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -LT 279 .77 362 LT 362 2 1.03 373 1.00 .00 S -RT 294 .88 334 RT 334 1 1.00 334 .00 1.00 S -TH 841 .88 956 TH 956 2 1.05 1004 .00 .00 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 04/24/97 09:45:06 IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet p Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj r Group Ideal of Sat - h Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 E- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 E- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 S- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 S- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 17 utback Steakhouse - Tukwila trander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway urrent 1997 Conditions IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] p Lane LT Adj r Group Phase Flow h Mvts Type Rate -- vph N- N- E- E- p Lane r Group h Mvts TH 794 LT Pri. 426 RT 615 LT Pri. 373 ycle Length, C 60 sec ost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec Vol Ratio v/c N- TH .317 N- LT .480 E- RT .736 E- LT .465 S- RT .325 S- TH .724 ycle= 60" nt Total .541 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Adj Satfl Rate vphg Flow Ratio v/s 3539 .120 Green Unif Delay Ratio Delay Fact g/C d1 DF -- sec /v . 673 3.1 .85 . 251 14.5 .85 .528 8.3 .85 . 227 15.2 .85 .649 3.6 .85 .372 12.3 .85 Green Ratio g/C Lane Group Capac vph V/C Ratio v/c 3725 .213 .673 2508 .317. .251 888 .480 1583 .388 .528 836 .736 3539 .105 .227 803 .465 S- RT 334 1583 .211 .649 1028 .325 S- TH 1004 3725 .269 .372 1387 .724 Sum(v /s) = .658 Xc = .731 IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph 2508 16 888 16 836 16 803, 16 1028 16 1387 16 Incr Delay d2 sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v Crit Lane Grp * 04/24/97 09:45:06 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - . 03 2.7 A .33 12.7 B > 6.2 B+ 2.38 9.4 B+ .32 13.3 B > 10.9 B . 07 3.1 A 1.33 11.8 B > 9.6 B+ > 8.8 B+ 13 utback Steakhouse - Tukwila trander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway :urrent 1997 Conditions :IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance .q 21 ( Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 • * / ** / forth IVMT TOTALS 'aram:Units LdjVol: vph lid /Ln:ft /# 1/C Rqd @C:% 1/C Used: % �V @E: vph >vc Lvl:LOS )eg Sat:v /c ►vg Del:s /v 'ot Del:min 1 Stops:veh lax Que:veh lax Que: ft ►PPR TOTALS 'aram:Units �djVol: vph ivc Lvl:LOS )eg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s/v 'ot Del:min / Stops:veh lax Que:veh lax Que: ft + + + + * * ** + +> v G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% v G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% N Approach. E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 0 794 426 615 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0 23 14 42 0 67 25 53 0 2508 888 836 A B B+ .00 .32 .48 .74 .0 4.4 20.0 14.9 0 15 36 38 0 82 91 119 0 9 11 10 0 109 135 245 N Approach E Approach 1220 B+ .37 9.8 51 173 20 135 G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% 0 373 334 1004 0 0 0 0 3546 0/0 24/2 12/1 24/2 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 13 25 29 0 0 0 0 0 23 65 37 0 0 0 0 0 803 1028 1387 0 0 0 0 7450 B A B B+ . 00 .47 .32 .72 .00 .00 .00 .00 .54 .0 20.9 5.5 17.9 .0 .0 .0 .0 13.7 0 33 8 75 0 0 0 0 205 0 81 37 216 0 0 0 0 626 988 B . 63 17.2 71 200 245 0 10 4 21 0 122 99 266 20 S Approach 1338 B+ .62 14.8 83 253 25 266 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 266 Int W Approach Total .00 .0 0 0 3546 0 0 0 04/24/97 09:45:07 B+ .54 13.7 205 626 65 266 1� utback Steakhouse - Tukwila trander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway uture 2001 Conditions without Project IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet ntersection # 0 - OSTTIME = 3.0 sec. q 21 * / ** / \ 'orth 0 .0 0 / + / 296 24.0 2 0 .0 0 -- 0 .0. 0 G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% .0 0 / 706 24.0 2 I Phase 2 v G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% 409 24.0 2 \ 0 .0 0 893 24.0 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 * * ** +> G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% 581 12.0 1 312 12.0 1 0 .0 0 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > 1 WIDTHS v LANES / \ North 04/24/97 09:41:58 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD ppr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type - RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .89 .90 .77 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .88 .88 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 20 utback Steakhouse - Tukwila trander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway uture 2001 Conditions without Project IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet .ppr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - vph N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 706 .88 802 TH 802 2 1.05 842 .00 .00 N -LT 409 .93 440 LT 440 2 1.03 453 1.00 .00 E -RT 581 .89 653 RT 653 1 1.00 653 .00 1.00 E -TH 0 .90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -LT 296 .77 384 LT 384 2 1.03 396 1.00 .00 . S -RT 312 .88 355 RT 355 1 1.00 355 .00 1.00 S -TH 893 .88 1015 TH 1015 2 1.05 1066 .00 .00 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 04/24/97 09:41 :59 IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet .p Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj 'r Group Ideal of Sat - th Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow - -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 E- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 E- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 S- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 S- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 utback Steakhouse - Tukwila trander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway uture 2001 Conditions without Project IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] p Lane r Group h Mvts LT Phase Type Adj Flow Rate vph N- TH 842 N- LT Pri. 453 E- RT 653 E- LT Pri. 396 S- RT 355 S- TH 1066 ycle Length, C 60 sec ost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec p Lane r Group h Mvts N- N- E- E- S- S- Vol Ratio v/c ycle= 60" nt Total .574 • - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Adj Satfl Rate vphg 3725 .226 .673 2508 .336 3539 .128 .251 888 .510 1583 .412 .528 836 .781 3539 .112 .227 803 .493 1583 .224 .649 1028 .345 3725 .286 IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Green Unif Delay Ratio Delay Fact g/C d1 DF -- sec /v TH .336 .673 3.1 .85 LT .510 .251 14.7 .85 RT .781 .528 8.6 .85 LT .493 .227 15.3 .85 RT .345 .649 3.6 .85 TH .769 .372 12.6 .85 Flow Ratio v/s Green Ratio g/C .372 1387 .769 Sum(v /s) = .699 Xc = .776 Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph - 1028 Lane Group Capac vph Incr Delay d2 sec /v 2508 16 .03 888 16 .42 836 16 3.36 803 16 .40 16 .08 1387 16 1.88 V/C Ratio v/c Lane Group Delay sec /v 2.7 12.9 10.7 13.4 3.2 12.6 Crit Lane Grp * 04/24/97 09:41:59 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - A B > 6.3 B+ B B > 11.7 B A B > 10.2 B > 9.3 B+ • / orth v VMT TOTALS aram:Units djVol: vph id /Ln:ft /# /C Rqd @C:% /C Used: % V @E: vph vc Lvl:LOS eg Sat:v /c vg Del:s /v ot Del:min Stops:veh ax Que:veh ax Que: ft PPR TOTALS aram:Units djVol: vph vc Lvl:LOS eg Sat:v /c vg Del:s /v 'ot Del:min Stops:veh lax Que:veh Mx Que: ft utback Steakhouse - Tukwila trander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway uture 2001 Conditions without Project IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance q 21 I Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 * / ** + " + * * ** +> G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 1295 B+ .40 10.0 54 186 v N Approach RT TH LT G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% 0 842 453 653 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0 24 15 44 0 67 25 53 0 2508 888 836 0 9 11 10 0 116 143 260 G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% A B B B A B .00 .34 .51 .78 .00 .49 .34 .77 .0 4.5 20.3 16.5 .0 21.2 5.6 18.8 0 16 38 45 0 35 8 83 0 89 97 131 0 86 40 234 N Approach E Approach E Approach S Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT 0 396 355 1066 0 0 0 0 3765 0/0 24/2 12/1 24/2 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 13 26 30 0 0 0 0 0 23 65 37 0 0 0 0 0 803 1028 1387 0 0 0 0 7450 B .67 18.3 80 217 0 10 4 22 0 129 105 282 1 049 1 421 S Approach B .66 15.5 91 274 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Approach Int RT TH LT Total .00 .0 0 04/24/97 09:42:00 B+ .00 .57 .0 14.4 0 225 0 677 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 282 Int W Approach Total 0 3765 B+ 57 14.4 225 677 20 20 26 0 66 143 260 282 0 282 23 utback Steakhouse - Tukwila trander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway uture 2001 Conditions with Project IGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet ntersection # 0 - q 21 * / ** / \ orth 0 .0 0 G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 -- OSTTIME = 3.0 sec. + + + + * * ** + +> v 717 24.0 2 v 0 .0 0 / + / 300 24.0 2 G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1$ 409 24.0 2 0 .0 0 900 24.0 2 G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% \ 581 12.0 1 / \ North 314 12.0 1 0 .0 0 G /C= .000 G= .0" .Y+R= .0" OFF= .0% Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD ppr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type - $ RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .89 .90 .77 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .88 .88 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 I Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% 04/24/97 09:40:08 G /C= .000 G= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 24 tback Steakhouse - Tukwila rander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway ture 2001 Conditions with Project GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet pr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - vph -- -- -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 -TH 717 .88 815 TH 815 2 1.05 856 .00 .00 -LT 409 .93 440 LT 440 2 1.03 453 1.00 .00 :-RT 581 .89 653 RT 653 1 1.00 653 .00 1.00 : -TH 0 .90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 : -LT 300 .77 390 LT 390 2 1.03 402 1.00 .00 : -RT 314 .88 357 : -TH 900 .88 1023 : -LT 0 .90 0 RT 357 1 1.00 357 .00 1.00 TH 1023 2 1.05 1074 .00 .00 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 04/24/97 09:40:09 :GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj Group Ideal of Sat - 1 Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Left Adj flow -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg I- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 1- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 ;- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 ;- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 25 tback Steakhouse - Tukwila rander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway ture 2001 Conditions with Project 3NAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Lane Group Mvts Lane Group Mvts LT Phase Type - TH 856 LT Pri. 453 RT 653 - LT Pri. 402 - RT 357 TH 1074 cle Length, C 60 sec st Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec Vol Ratio v/c - TH .341 - LT .510 - RT .781 - LT .501 - RT .347 - TH .774 cle= 60" t Total .577 Adj Flow Rate vph Green Ratio g/C Adj Satfl Rate vphg Flow Ratio v/s 3725 .230 3539 .128 1 583 .412 3539 .114 Green Ratio g/C .528 1583 .225 .649 1028 .347 3725 .288 .372 Unif Delay Delay Fact d1 DF sec /v .673 3.2 .85 .251 14.7 .85 .528 8.6 .85 .227 15.4 .85 .649 3.6 .85 .372 12.6 .85 . 673 2508 .341 .251 888 .510 . 227 803 .501 Sum(v /s) = .701 Xc = .779 GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph - 2508 16 888 16 836 16 803 16 1028 16 1387 16 Lane Group Capac vph 836 .781 1387 Incr Delay d2 sec /v V/C Ratio v/c Lane Group Delay sec /v Crit Lane Grp * .774 04/24/97 09:40:09 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - . 03 2.7 A .42 12.9 B > 6.2 B+ 3.36 10.7 B . 43 13.5 B > 11.8 B . 09 3.2 A 1.97 12.7 B > 10.3 B > 9.3 B+ 2G Y?3ki v?,kaffWlii.vt fib. M ee..t 9p w:;:.w: a ..arnmv.n4.4.,....:..•,..,..,..w . w. ew..,•w.....,. w •.w,...1>.r.w....•.114..w14∎404•4 ............ ............._..... tback Steakhouse - Tukwila rander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway ture 2001 Conditions with Project GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance 21 1 Phase 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 / ** rth v MT TOTALS .ram:Units jVol: vph d /Ln:ft /# C Rqd @C:% C Used: % @E: vph c Lvl:LOS Sat:v /c 'g Del:s /v it Del:min Stops:veh :x Que:veh :x Que: ft 'PR TOTALS tram:Units ljVo1: vph 'c Lvl:LOS Sat:v /c .g Del:s /v )t Del:min Stops:veh ix Que:veh ix Que: ft + " + * * ** +> G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% v G /C= .356 G =. 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% N Approach RT TH LT 0 856 453 653 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0 25 15 44 0 67 25 53 0 2508 888 836 A B B .00 .34 .51 .78 .0 4.5 20.3 16.5 0 16 38 45 0 91 97 131 0 9 11 10 0 118 143 260 B+ .40 10.0 54 188 G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% N Approach E Approach E Approach S Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT 0 402 357 1074 0 0 0 0 3795 0/0 24/2 12/1 24/2 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 14 26 30 0 0 0 0 0 23 65 37 0 0 0 0 0 803 1028 1387 0 0 0 0 7450 B A B .00 .50 .35 .77 .0 21.2 5.7 18.9 0 36 8 85 0 88 40 237 0 10 4 22 0 131 106 284 S Approach 1309 1055 1431 0 3795 B B .67 .67 18.3 15.6 81 93 219 277 20 20 26 143 260 284 04/24/97 09:40:10 W Approach Int RT TH LT Total B+ .00 .00 .00 .00 .58 .0 .0 .0 .0 14.4 0 0 0 0 228 0 0 0 0 684 0 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 284 Int W Approach Total .00 .0 0 0 B+ .58 14.4 228 684 0 66 0 284 27 tersection # 0 - 725 12.0 1 268 12.0 1 0 .0 0 - 406 12.0 1 STTIME = 3.0 sec. • 31 irth 434 24.0 2 Phase 1 Phase 2 <* + ++++ * + v * + G/C= .363 G= 32.7" Y+R= 4.0" OFF= .0% < * + v G/C= .223 G= 20.1" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=40.7% 0 .0 0 1066 24.0 2 tback Steakhouse - Tukwila ickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway rrent 1997 Conditions GNAL94/TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] HCM Input Worksheet 322 24.0 2 G/C= .281 G= 25.3" Y+R= 4.0" OFF=67.5% 0 .0 0 Phase 3 Phase 4 04/24/97 09:56:21 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- I WIDTHS v LANES 0 .0 0 / 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 North Phasing: SEQUENCE 31 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD • pr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .86 .90 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .92 .88 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .77 .90 .92 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Phase 5 Phase 6 G/C= .000 G/C= .000 G/C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= .0" Y+R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y=12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% tback Steakhouse - Tukwila ickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway rrent 1997 Conditions GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet pr Mvt Flow Mvt Vol PHF Rate vph -- vph - RT 725 .86 - TH 434 .90 - LT 0 .93 - RT 0 .90 0 -TH 322 .92 350 - LT 1066 .88 1211 - RT 406 .77 - TH 0 .90 - LT 268 .92 Lane No Group Ideal of Mvmts Satfl Lns -- pcphg - 843 RT 482 TH 0 TH LT 527 RT 0 -- 291 LT Lane Group Group Flow -- vph 843 482 0 No.of Lane Lanes Uti1 1 2 0 527 1 0 0 291 1 GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation 1.00 1 .05 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 350 2 1.05 367 .00 .00 1211 2 1.03 . 1247 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adjustment Factors RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1 TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1 - LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1 RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1 Adj Prop.of Flow LT RT vph 843 .00 1.00 506 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 527 .00 1.00 0 .00 .00 291 1.00 .00 Flow Adjustment Worksheet Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Left Adj Turn Fact 04/24/97 09:56:21 Adj Sat - flow vphg . 850 1.000 1.00 1583 . 000 1.000 1.00 3725 . 000 1.000 1.00 3725 .000 .950 1.00 3539 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 . 000 .950 1.00 1770 tback Steakhouse - Tukwila ickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway rrent 1997 Conditions 3NAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] Lane Group Mvts RT TH TH 367 LT Pri. 1247 RT - LT Pri. 291 cle Length, C 90 sec st Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Lane Group Mvts - RT .951 - TH .580 TH LT LT Adj Phase Flow Type Rate -- vph Vol Ratio v/c .154 .943 - RT .476 - LT .564 cle= 90" t Total .725 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Adj Satfl Rate vphg 843 1583 .532 .559 886 .951 506 3725 .136 .234 873 .580 3725 .099 .641 2390 .154 3539 .352 .374 1323 .943 527. 1583 .333 .699 1107 .476 1770 Green Unif Delay Ratio Delay Fact g/C d1 DF -- sec /v . 559 14.2 .85 . 234 23.2 .85 .641 4.9 .85 . 374 20.7 .85 .699 4.6 .85 .292 20.5 .85 Flow Ratio v/s Green Ratio g/C .164 .292 Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph 886 873 Lane Group Capac vph V/C Ratio v/c 516 .564 Sum(v /s) = .885 Xc = .948 Incr Delay d2 sec /v 16 14.29 16 .72 2390 16 .00 1323 16 9.80 1107 16 .26 516 16 1.08 Lane Group Delay sec /v Crit Lane Grp * 04/24/97 s3 09:56:22 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - 26.4 D+ 20.4 C > 24.1 C 4.1 A 27.4 D+ > 22.1 C 4.2 A 18.5 C+ > 9.3 B+ > 20.1 C 30 st rth <* + + + ++ * + v * + C= 90 sec jVol: vph d /Ln:ft /# C Rqd @C:% C Used: % @E: vph c Lvl:LOS g Sat:v /c g Del:s/v t Del:min Stops:veh x Que:veh x Que: ft PR TOTALS ram:Units jVol: vph c Lvl:LOS g Sat:v /c g Del:s /v t Del:min Stops:veh x Que:veh x Que: ft tback Steakhouse - Tukwila ickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Trent 1997 Conditions 3NAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance 31 1 Phase 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 / ** G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% MT TOTALS N Approach ram:Units RT TH LT 843 506 12/1 24/2 56 19 56 23 886 873 D+ C .95 .58 31.0 31.5 109 66 199 112 G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% 19 19 470 245 N Approach 1349 ' C .81 31.2 175 311 c G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% E Approach S Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT 0 0 0 0 0 367 1247 527 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0 0 0 0 0 15 38 39 0 0 0 0 0 64 37 70 0 0 0 0 0 2390 1323 1107 .00 .00 .00 .0 .0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 39 8 0 0 0 0 0 83 494 201 E Approach .00 .0 0 0 .00 .0 0 A D+ .00 .15 .94 .0 6.6 44.9 0 10 233 0 36 301 S Approach 0 1614 C .76 36.2 243 337 38 0 46 470 0 494 04/24/97 09:56:22 Ped= .0 sec = .0% W Approach Int RT TH LT Total 0 291 3781 0/0 12/1 0 23 0 29 0 516 7095 A C+ C .48 .00 .56 .73 7.4 .0 29.4 29.9 16 0 36 470 59 0 62 769 W Approach 818 B+ .51 15.2 52 1 21 0 10 102 0 261 494 18 261 Int Total 3781 C .73 29.9 470 769 102 494 31 tback Steakhouse - Tukwila ickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway ture 2001 Conditions without Project GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet tersection # 0 - 285 12.0 1 0 .0 0 -- 431 12.0 1 STTIME = 3.0 sec. - $ RT 'rth <* + + + ++ * + v * + 770 12.0 1 G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% * * <* 461 24.0 2 v G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% 0 .0 0 1132 24.0 2 N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 * * <* 342 24.0 2 G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .86 .90 .93 0 .90 .90 .90 0 .90 .92 .88 0 .77 .90 .92 / North 04/24/97 09:54:27 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES Phasing: SEQUENCE 31 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD pr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT 0- Y Y Y 3 0- Y Y Y 3 0- Y Y Y 3 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 3 3 31 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 I Phase 5 Phase 6 / ** G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y+R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% 3ti 3 3 3 3 C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% tback Steakhouse - Tukwila ickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway ture 2001 Conditions without Project 3NAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet pr Ylvt Mvt Flow Vol PHF Rate vph -- vph - RT 770 .86 - TH 461 .90 - LT 0 .93 895 RT 512 TH 0 -RT 0 .90 0 - TH 342 .92 372 TH -LT 1132 .88 1286 LT -RT 431 .77 560 -TH 0 .90 0 - LT 285 .92 310 Lane No Group Ideal of Mvmts Satfl Lns -- pcphg - RT TH TH LT RT LT Lane Group Group Flow -- vph RT LT 895 512 0 0 372 1286 560 0 310 No.of Lane Lanes Util 1 2 0 0 2 2 1 0 1 1.00 1.05 1 .00 1 .00 1.05 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adjustment Factors Adj Prop.of Flow LT RT vph 895 .00 1.00 538 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 391 .00 .00 1325 1.00 .00 560 .00 1.00 0 .00 .00 310 1.00 .00 GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact 04/24/97 09:54:28 Adj Sat - flow vphg 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1. 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 33 tback Steakhouse - Tukwila ickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway ture 2001 Conditions without Project GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] Lane Group Mvts RT TH Lane Group Mvts LT Phase Type - TH 391 - LT Pri. 1325 - RT 560 1583 - LT Pri. 310 1770 cle Length, C 90 sec st Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Vol Ratio v/c - RT 1.010 - TH .616 TH .164 LT 1.002 - RT .506 - LT .601 cle= 90" t Total .770 Adj Flow Rate vph Adj Satfl Rate vphg - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet 895 1583 .565 .559 886 1.010 538 3725 .144 .234 873 .616 3725 .105 .641 2390 .164 3539 .374 .374 1323 1.002 Green Unif Delay Ratio Delay Fact g/C d1 DF -- sec /v . 559 15.1 .85 . 234 23.4 .85 .641 4.9 .85 .374 21.4 .85 . 699 4.8 .85 . 292 20.8 .85 Flow Ratio v/s .175 Green Ratio g/C Lane Group Capac vph V/C Ratio v/c .354 .699 1107 .506 .292 516 .601 Sum(v /s) = Xc = Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph Incr Delay d2 sec /v .940 1.007 Lane Group Delay sec /v 886 16 25.70 38.5 873 16 .95 20.9 2390 16 .00 4.2 1323 16 19.36 37.6 1107 16 .33 4.4 516 16 1.42 19.1 Crit Lane Grp * 04/24/97 09:54:28 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - D C > 31.9 D+ A D > 30.0 D+ A C+ > 9.6 B+ > 26.2 D+ 3 y tback Steakhouse - Tukwila ickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway ture 2001 Conditions without Project GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance 31 I Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 / ** rth <* + + + + ++ * + + + + ++ v * + + v C= 90 sec MT TOTALS .ram:Units .jVol: vph d /Ln:ft /# C Rqd @C:% C Used: % ' @E: vph •c Lvl:LOS :g Sat:v /c 'g Del:s /v )t Del:min Stops:veh ix Que:veh ix Que: ft 'PR TOTALS Lram:Units • ljVol: vph 'c Lvl:LOS !g Sat:v /c 'g Del:s /v )t Del:min Stops:veh ►x Que:veh ix Que: ft * tback Steakhouse - Tukwila ickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Lure 2001 Conditions with Project 3NAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet tersection # 0 - 31 / ** \ r th 770 12.0 1 0 .0 0 -- 436 12.0 1 STTIME = 3.0 sec. Phase 1 <* + + + ++ * + v * + G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 467 24.0 2 d G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% 0 .0 0 285 12.0 1 / + \ 1137 24.0 2 pr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .86 .90 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .92 .88 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .77 .90 .92 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Phase 2 Phase 3 344 24.0 2 G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% \ 0 .0 0 / \ 0 .0 0 / 0 .0 0 North 0 .0 0 Phase 4 04/24/97 09:52:55 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > 1 WIDTHS v LANES Phasing: SEQUENCE 31 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 30 • tback Steakhouse - Tukwila ickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway ture 2001 Conditions with Project GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet pr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - vph -- -RT 770 .86 895 RT 895 1 1.00 895 .00 1.00 - TH 467 .90 519 TH 519 2 1.05 545 .00 .00 -LT 0 .93 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 - TH 344 .92 374 TH 374 2 1.05 393 .00 .00 -LT 1137 .88 1292 LT 1292 2 1.03 1331 1.00 .00 - RT 436 .77 566 RT 566 1 1.00 566 .00 1.00 -TH 0 .90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 -LT 285 .92 310 LT 310 1 1.00 310 1.00 .00 04/24/97 09:52:55 GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj Group Ideal of Sat - Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg - RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 - TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 - LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 - RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 - LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 37 tback Steakhouse - Tukwila ickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway ture 2001 Conditions with Project GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Lane Group Mvts LT Adj Phase Flow Type Rate vph - RT 895 - TH 545 - TH 393 - LT Pri. 1331 - RT 566 - LT Pri. 310 cle Length, C 90 sec st Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec Lane Group Mvts Vol Ratio v/c - RT 1.010 - TH .624 - TH .164 - LT 1.006 - RT .511 - LT .601 cle= 90" t Total .773 HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Adj Satfl Rate vphg Flow Ratio v/s 1583 .565 3725 .146 3725 .105 3539 .376 1583 .357 1770 .175 Green Unif Delay Ratio Delay Fact g/C d1 DF -- sec /v .559 15.1 .85 .234 23.5 .85 . 641 4.9 .85 .374 21.4 .85 . 699 4.8 .85 . 292 20.8 .85 Green Ratio g/C .559 . 374 Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph 1107 16 516 16 Lane Group Capac vph V/C Ratio v/c 886 1.010 . 234 873 .624 .641 2390 .164 1323 1.006 .699 1107 .511 . 292 516 .601 Sum(v /s) = .941 Xc = 1.009 GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Incr Delay d2 sec /v 886 16 25.70 873 16 1.01 2390 16 .00 1323 16 20.40 Lane Group Delay sec /v Crit Lane Grp * 04/24/97 09:52:56 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - 38.5 D 21.0 C > 31.9 D+ 4.2 A 38.6 D > 30.8 D+ .34 4.4 A 1.42 19.1 C+ > 9.6 B+ > 26.6 D+ 38 :back Steakhouse - Tukwila ickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway :ure 2001 Conditions with Project 3NAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance 31 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 / ** rth jVol: vph 3 /Ln:ft /# • Rqd @C:% C Used: % @E: vph c Lvl:LOS g Sat:v /c g Del:s /v t Del:min Stops:veh x Que:veh x Que: ft PR TOTALS ram:Units jVol: vph c Lvl:LOS g Sat:v /c g Del:s /v t Del:min Stops:veh x Que:veh x Que: ft <* + + + ++ * + v * + G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% C= 90 sec * * <* 22 21 551 264 G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% MT TOTALS N Approach ram:Units RT TH LT 895 545 12/1 24/2 59 20 56 23 886 873 N Approach 1440 D+ 86 38.4 231 345 43 551 + v c * * <* G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% E Approach RT TH LT 0 0 0 0 0 393 1331 566 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0 0 0 0 0 16 40 41 0 0 0 0 0 64 37 70 0 0 0 0 0 2390 1323 1107 D C 1.01 .62 .00 .00 .00 42.3 32.0 .0 .0 .0 158 73 0 0 0 223 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E Approach 0 .00 .0 0 0 0 0 S Approach W Approach Int RT TH. LT RT TH LT Total A D A .00 .00 .16 1.01 .51 .0 .0 6.6 46.2 7.8 0 0 11 256 18 0 0 39 332 66 0 0 7 43 9 0 0 89 549 215 S Approach 1724 D+ .81 37.2 267 371 50 549 04/24/97 09:52:56 0 310 4040 0/0 12/1 0 24 0 29 0 516 7095 C+ .00 .60 .0 30.1 0 39 0 67 W Approach 876 B+ .54 15.7 57 133 278 D+ .77 33.0 555 849 0 11 113 0 278 551 20 Int Total 4040 D+ 77 33.0 555 849 33 113 551 tback Steakhouse - Tukwila 5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway rrent 1997 Conditions 3NAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet tersection # 0 - .0 0 157 12.0 1 / + / 243 12.0 1 North 89 12.0 1 -- 5 .0 0 STTIME = 3.0 sec. G /C= .449 G= 27.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 911 24.0 2 Phase 1 Phase 2 + + ++ + + ++ v + + + +> + + ++ v G /C= .417 G= 25.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =51.6% 45 12.0 1 \ \ 0 .0 0 776 24.0 2 \ 52 .0 0 / • \ 71 .0 0 0 12.0 1 Phase 3 Phase 4 04/24/97 10:16:06 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD pr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type $ RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .81 .90 .84 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .80 .95 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .50 .66 .58 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 40 - LT 1900 tback Steakhouse - Tukwila 5 Off Ramp, Mali Entrance on Southcenter Parkway rrent 1997 Conditions GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet pr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT - vph -- vph -- vph - vph - RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 - TH 911 .88 1035 TH 1035 2 1.05 1087 .00 .00 - LT 45 .93 48 LT 48 1 1.00 48 1.00 .00 -RT 52 .81 64 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 - TH 0 .90 0 TH +RT 64 1 1.00 64 .00 1.00 - LT 243 .84 289 LT 289 1 1.00 289 1.00 .00 - RT 71 .80 89 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 -TH 776 .95 817 TH +RT 906 2 1.05 951 .00 .10 - LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 - RT 5 .50 10 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 - TH 89 .66 135 TH +RT 145 1 1.00 145 .00 .07 -LT 157 .58 271 LT 271 1 1.00 271 1.00 .00 04/24/97 10:16:07 GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj Group Ideal of Sat - Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg - TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .143 1.00 266 - TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .657 1.00 1224 - TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .985 1.000 1.00 3671 TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .990 1.000 1.00 1843 LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 41 aback Steakhouse - Tukwila 04/24/97 5 Off Ramp, Mali Entrance on Southcenter Parkway 10:16:07 rrent 1997 Conditions GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Approach N -LT E -LT S -LT put /Calculation W -LT Cycle Length 60.0000 60.0000 .0000 .0000 - Actual Green Time 26.9690 25.0310 .0000 .0000 - Effective Green Time 27.9690 26.0310 .0000 .0000 - Opp. Effective Green Time 27.9690 26.0310 .0000 .0000 - Number of Lanes 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) 2.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 T - Adjusted LT Flow Rate 48.0000 289.0000 .0000 .0000 T - Proportion of LT 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 To - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 - Adjusted Opp. Flow 'Rate 951.0000 145.0000 .0000 .0000 - Lost Time 3.0000 3.0000 .0000 .0000 C - Left Turns per Cycle .8000 4.8167 .0000 .0000 lc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle 7.9250 2.4167 .0000 .0000 o - Opposing Platoon Ratio 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 - First LT Effect. Green .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 o - Opposing Queue Ratio .5339 .5661 .0000 .0000 - Opp. Queue Effect. Green 8.4992 .0000 .0000 .0000 - Unsaturated Effect. Green 19.4697 26.0310 .0000 .0000 - -LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) .2806 .7844 .0000 .0000 - Proportion of LT (9 -17) 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) 4.2496 .0000 .0000 .0000 'Ho - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 1 - TH Equivalent for LT 5.6855 1.5213 .0000 .0000 .2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 in - Minimum Value for fLT .1430 .1537 .0000 .0000 - LT Factor for LT (9 -17) .1430 .6574 .0000 .0000 al - LT Factor for Lane Group .1430 .6574 .0000 .0000 tback Steakhouse - Tukwila 5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway rrent 1997 Conditions GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - TH 1087 - LT Pri. 48 - TH +RT - LT Pri. 289 - TH +RT - TH +RT - LT Pri. 271 cle Length, C 60 sec st Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM TH +RT .093 Lane Group Mvts Lane Group Mvts LT Phase Type Vol Ratio v/c TH .626 LT .387 LT .544 TH +RT .556 TH +RT .181 LT .353 •cle= 60" It Total .530 Adj Flow Rate vph 64 145 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Adj Satfl Rate vphg 3725 .292 .466 1737 .626 266 .180 .466 124 .387 1583 .040 .434 687 .093 1224 .236 .434 531 .544 951 3671 .259 .466 1711 .556 1843 1770 Green Unif Ratio Delay g/C d1 -- sec /v Delay Fact DF .466 9.2 .85 . 466 7.9 .85 .434 7.6 .85 . 434 9.6 .85 . 466 8.8 .85 .434 7.9 .85 .434 8.6 .85 Flow Ratio v/s Green Ratio g/C .079 .434 .153 .434 Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph 1737 16 124 16 687 16 531 16 1711 16 800 16 768 16 Lane Group Capac vph V/C Ratio v/c 800 .181 768 .353 Sum(v /s) = .528 Xc = .586 Level -of- Service Worksheet Incr Delay d2 sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v . 52 8.3 1.02 7.8 .00 6.5 .90 9.0 . 31 7.8 .01 6.8 .12 7.5 Crit Lane Grp * 04/24/97 10:16:08 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - B+ B+ > 8.3 B+ B+ B+ > 8.6 B+ B+ > 7.8 B+ B+ B+ > 7.2 B+ > 8.0 B+ 43 tback Steakhouse - Tukwila 5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway rrent 1997 Conditions 3NAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance 11 1 Phase 1 / ** th * * * v +> G /C= .449 G= 27.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% Phase 2 G /C= .417 G= 25.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =51.6% 04/24/97 10:16:08 C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MT TOTALS ram:Units jVol: vph d /Ln:ft /# C Rgd @C:% C Used: % @E: vph c Lvl:LOS g Sat:v /c g Del:s /v g Del:min Stops:veh x Que:veh x Que: ft PR TOTALS ram:Units c Lvl:LOS g Sat:v /c g Del:s /v t Del:min Stops:veh N Approach E Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT 0 1087 0/0 24/2 12/1 0 31 0 0 47 47 0 1737 119 B+ B+ .00 .63 .39 .0 13.1 18.9 0 59 4 0 205 8 0 19 0 245 N Approach B+ .62 13.3 63 213 64 0 289 0/0 12/1 12/1 0 7 28 0 43 43 0 687 531 B+ B+ .00 .09 .54 .0 10.3 15.6 0 3 19 0 9 54 1 0 1 5 25 0 31 138 E Approach jVol: vph 1135 353 B+ .46 14.6 22 63 x Que:veh 20 6 x Que: ft 245 138 S Approach RT TH LT 93 858 0/0 24/2 0 28 0 47 0 1711 B+ .00 .56 .0 12.4 0 49 0 171 0 17 0 214 S Approach 951 B+ .56 12.4 49 171 17 214 W Approach Int RT TH LT Total 0 10 135 271 2855 0/0 0/0 12/1 12/1 0 0 11 19 0 0 43 43 0 0 800 768 6353 B+ B+ B+ .00 .00 .18 .35 .53 .0 .0 10.9 12.4 13.0 0 0 7 14 155 0 0 22 45 514 0 0 3 5 0 0 69 129 W Approach 416 B+ .29 11.9 21 67 8 129 51 245 Int Total 2855 B+ .53 13.0 155 514 4 4 51 245 tback Steakhouse - Tukwila 5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway ture 2001 Conditions without Project 3NAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4) - HCM Input Worksheet tersection # 0 - 167 12.0 1 95 12.0 1 -- 5 .0 0 STTIME = 3.0 sec. Phase 1 Phase 2 G /C= .449 G= 27.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 0 .0 0 967 24.0 2 v • * * ** + + ++ v + + + +> + + ++ G /C= .417 G= 25.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =51 . 6% 48 12.0 1 \ 55 .0 0 + / 258 12..0 1 0 .0 0 824 24.0 2 75 .0 0 Phase 3 Phase 4 0 12.0 1 04/24/97 10:11:51 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > 1 WIDTHS v LANES / North Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD pr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type - RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .81 .90 .84 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .80 .95 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .50 .66 .58 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 45 r.....- .s....» :back Steakhouse - Tukwila 5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway :ure 2001 Conditions without Project 3NAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet )r Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of 9vt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - vph -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 -TH 967 .88 1099 TH 1099 2 1.05 1154 .00 .00 -LT 48 .93 52 LT 52 1 1.00 52 1.00 .00 -RT 55 .81 68 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 -TH 0 .90 0 TH +RT 68 1 1.00 68 .00 1.00 -LT 258 .84 307 LT 307 1 1.00 307 1.00 .00 -RT 75 .80 94 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 -TH 824 .95 867 TH +RT 961 2 1.05 1009 .00 .10 -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 -RT 5 .50 10 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 -TH 95 .66 144 TH +RT 154 1 1.00 154 .00 .06 -LT 167 .58 288 LT 288 1 1.00 288 1.00 .00 04/24/97 10:11:51 3NAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj Group Ideal of Sat - Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .143 1.00 26'6 TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .641 1.00 1193 TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .985 1.000 1.00 3671 TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .990 1.000 1.00 1845 LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 4 u tback Steakhouse - Tukwila 5 Off Ramp, Mali Entrance on Southcenter Parkway ture 2001 Conditions without Project GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4) - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Approach N -LT E -LT put /Calculation S -LT 04/24/97 10:11:52 W -LT - Cycle Length 60.0000 60.0000 .0000 .0000 - Actual Green Time 26.9690 25.0310 .0000 .0000 - Effective Green Time 27.9690 26.0310 .0000 .0000 - Opp. Effective Green Time 27.9690 26.0310 .0000 .0000 - Number of Lanes 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) 2.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 T - Adjusted LT Flow Rate 52.0000 307.0000 .0000 .0000 T - Proportion of LT 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 To - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate 1009.0000 154.0000 .0000 .0000 - Lost Time 3.0000 3.0000 .0000 .0000 C - Left Turns per Cycle .8667 5.1167 .0000 .0000 lc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle 8.4083 2.5667 .0000 .0000 o - Opposing Platoon Ratio 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 First LT Effect. Green .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 o - Opposing Queue Ratio .5339 .5661 .0000 .0000 - Opp. Queue Effect. Green 9.4737 .1781 .0000 .0000 - Unsaturated Effect. Green 18.4953 25.8529 .0000 .0000 - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) .2444 .7788 .0000 .0000 - Proportion of LT (9 -17) 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) 4.7368 .0891 .0000 .0000 Ho - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) 1.0000 1.0000 .0000 .0000 1 - TH Equivalent for LT 6.3890 1.5505 .0000 .0000 2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 in - Minimum Value for fLT .1430 .1537 .0000 .0000 - LT Factor for LT (9 -17) .1430 .6405 .0000 .0000 T - LT Factor for Lane Group . .1430 .6405 .0000 .0000 47 tback Steakhouse - Tukwila 5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway ture 2001 Conditions without Project 3NAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Lane Group Mvts - TH +RT - TH +RT - TH +RT Lane Group Mvts - TH .664 LT .419 - TH +RT' .099 - LT .593 - TH +RT .590 - TH +RT .192 - LT .375 cle= 60" t Total .564 LT Adj Adj Phase Flow Satfl Type Rate Rate -- vph vphg - TH 1154 - LT Pri. 52 68 - LT Pri. 307 1009 154 - LT Pri. 288 cle Length, C 60 sec st Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec Vol Ratio v/c Flow Ratio v/s 3725 .310 266 .195 1583 .043 1193 .257 3671 .275 1845 .083 1770 .163 Green Unif Delay Ratio Delay Fact g/C d1 DF -- sec /v .466 9.4 .85 . 466 8.1 .85 . 434 7.6 .85 . 434 9.8 .85 . 466 9.0 .85 .434 8.0 .85 . 434 8.7 .85 Green Ratio g/C . 466 1737 .434 518 Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph Worksheet Lane Group Capac vph . 466 124 .419 . 434 687 .099 . 466 1711 .590 .434 800 .192 .434 768 .375 Sum(v /s) = .567 Xc = .630 GNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Incr Delay d2 sec /v 1737 16 .69 124 16 1.36 687 16 .00 518 16 1.33 1711 16 .40 800 16 .02 768 16 .15 V/C Ratio v/c .664 .593 Lane Group Delay sec /v Crit Lane Grp 04/24/97 10:11:52 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - 8.7 B+ 8.2 B+ > 8.7 B+ 6.5 B+ 9.7 B+ > 9.1 B+ 8.0 B+ > 8.0 B+ 6.8 B+ 7.6 B+ > 7.3 B+ > 8.3 B+ 48 : back Steakhouse - Tukwila 5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway :ure 2001 Conditions without Project 3NAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance 11 I Phase 1 Phase 2 / ** th C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% NIT TOTALS ram:Units jVol: vph 3 /Ln:ft /# • Rqd @C:% Used: % @E: vph c Lvl:LOS g Sat:v /c g Del:s /v t Del:min Stops:veh x Que:veh x Que: ft PR TOTALS ram:Units c Lvl:LOS g Sat:v /c g Del:s /v t Del:min Stops:veh G /C= .449 G= 27.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% N Approach E Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT 0 1154 52 0/0 24/2 12/1 0 32 0 0 47 47 0 1737 119 B+ B+ .00 .66 .42 .0 13.5 20.1 0 65 4 0 223 9 0 21 0 260 G /C= .417 G= 25.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =51.6% 68 0 307 0/0 12/1 12/1 0 7 30 0 43 43 0 687 518 B+ B+ .00 .10 .59 .0 10.3 16.5 0 3 21 0 10 59 1 0 1 6 25 0 32 147 N Approach E Approach jVol: vph 1206 375 B+ .65 13.8 69 232 B+ .50 15.4 24 69 x Que:veh 22 7 x Que: ft 260 147 S Approach RT TH LT 99 910 0/0 24/2 0 29 0 47 0 1711 B+ .00 .59 .0 12.7 0 53 0 186 0 18 0 227 S Approach 1009 B+ .59 12.7 53 186 18 227 04/24/97 10:11:53 W Approach Int RT TH LT Total 0 10 144 288 3032 0/0 0/0 12/1 12/1 0 0 11 20 0 0 43 43 0 0 800 768 6340 B+ B+ .00 .00 .19 .38 .0 .0 11.0 12.7 0 0 7 15 0 0 24 49 0 0 3 5 0 0 74 138 W Approach 442 B+ .31 12.1 22 73 8 138 B+ .56 13.4 168 560 55 260 Int Total 3032 B+ .56 13.4 168 560 55 260 S HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c OTBK- P5.HCO Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611 -2083 Ph: (904) 392 -0378 Streets: (N -S) Southcenter Pkwy (E -W) Site Access Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst Date of Analysis 4/25/97 Other Information Future 2001 Conditions Two -way Stop - controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop /Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's ( %) SU /RV's ( %) CV's ( %) PCE's Queuing Comments Northbound L T R 0 2 < 0 N 1205 19 .95 .95 0 Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road Southbound L T R 1 2 0 15 501 .95 .95 0 1 .10 N 5.50 5.50 6.50 7.00 Eastbound L T R 0 0 0 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 5 0 9 .95 .95 .95 0 1.10 1.10 1.10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow -up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 The level of service analysis indicates that some queuing will take place. On site it will amount to not more than a single vehicle since the 95 percent probability queue length is computed to be 0.2 vehicles which can be rounded up to one (1). In the southbound 2 -way, left turn lane the LOS is at 'C' and the 95 percent probability queue length is computed to be 0.0 vehicles which, for a worst case, can be also rounded up to one (1) although for the majority of the time there will be no vehicles waiting. So Step 1: RT from Minor Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: Step 2: LT from Major Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: Step 3: TH from Minor Street Step 4: LT from Minor Street SB L 18 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c OTBK- P5.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection 644 653 653 0.98 1288 349 349 0.95 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1821 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 94 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.95 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 89 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1821 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 73 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.95 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.95 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.95 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 69 WB EB SB NB WB EB WB EB Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec /veh) (veh) (sec /veh) WB L 6 69 > WB T 0 89 > 156 25.7 0.2 D 25.7 WB R 10 653 > 349 10.9 0.0 C 0.3 Intersection Delay = 0.3 sec /veh S � STORM DRAINAGE REPORT for OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE Tukwila, Washington Project No. 97002 Prepared for: Evergreen State Restaurant Corporation 2451 - 152nd Avenue N.E. Redmond, Washington 98052 (206)885-7570 Prepared by: Pacific Engineering Design, Inc. 130 Andover Park East, Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98121 (206)431-7970 June 9, 1997 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 0 9 1997 PERMIT CENTER ben -0(80 Outback Steakhouse Storm Drainage Report PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project site is a located in the southwest corner of the Doubletree Guest Suites hotel property, on Southcenter Parkway, just south of Strander Boulevard. The proposed project consists of a 6,500 sf restaurant building with associated parking, utility and landscaping improvements. It will be constructed on a portion of the hotel's west parking lot. Approximately 42,000 sf of existing parking area will be redeveloped for the project. Water, gas, electricity and drainage utilities already exist onsite to serve the project. Sanitary sewer service will be provided via extension from the existing main in Southcenter Parkway. The site will be accessed via an existing driveway from the Parkway. EXISTING DRAINAGE: 2 Presently, the project site drains to existing parking lot catchbasins located at low points on the north and west sides of the redevelopment area. The parking lot is graded at an average slope of approximately 3 %. Runoff sheet flows over asphalt pavement into the catchbasins and enters a conveyance system comprised of 12" and 15" corrugated metal pipe. This system receives drainage from the entire hotel site, which is approximately 7.7 acres in size. The system conveys runoff to the southwest corner of the hotel property, where it is discharged to a 24" storm sewer draining south under the east edge of the Parkway right -of -way. According to plans prepared by Triad Associates for the original hotel project, runoff passes through an oil -water separator (Tee -riser without bottom plate) located at the bottom end of the system, just prior to the discharge. Downstream System: As the project will not increase the amount of impervious surface which currently drains to the existing 24" receiving system (total impervious area will actually be reduced as a result of new landscaping areas being added), the downstream system was not evaluated for redevelopment impacts. PROPOSED DRAINAGE: Storm Water Detention Design: Detention is not required for this redevelopment project. •;N'2+P a*A00i0.^roiS van..,,...... Outback Steakhouse Storm Drainage Report Water Quality Treatment Design: 3 Collection and Conveyance Design: The proposed drainage improvements necessary for this project system are minimal. A portion of an existing 12" cmp line which drains west under the proposed building pad will be relocated to skirt around the south side of the building. Four new catchbasins and connecting pipe will be installed to accomplish this. Building roof and footing drains will connect to one of the new catchbasins. Project parking areas will be graded and paved to maintain existing drainage patterns. Other than the oil -water separator structure noted above, there are no water quality treatment facilities onsite. City of Tukwila drainage code requires redevelopment projects to meet current water quality treatment standards. To comply with the code, the project must treat runoff using either a biofilter swale or a coalescing -plate oil -water separator (CPS). As there is insufficient available site area for a swale, the latter option was selected. According to Mr. Phil Fraser, City of Tukwila Drainage Engineer, the CPS should be sized to treat 2 -year storm runoff from the redevelopment area (or its equivalent). It should then be inserted into the existing drainage system at a point where it will provide the greatest benefit - i.e.: where it will treat the largest site area. Flows in excess of the 2 -year (or rated capacity of the selected CPS) should bypass the CPS. Based on a calculated 2 -year storm runoff rate (for the redevelopment area) of 0.38 cfs, a CPS equivalent to a model 577 -6 -SA, manufactured by Pacific International Pipe Enterprises, Inc., is required. This model will treat up to 0.45 cfs. A "flow- splitting structure" is provided upstream of the CPS to bypass flows in excess of this amount. The CPS will be inserted into the existing drainage system at a point receiving runoff from more than 60% of the total hotel property. The "flow- splitting structure" consists of a 54" manhole inserted into the existing 15" conveyance system. Discharge to the CPS will be limited to 0.45 cfs using a 6 -inch orifice with a maximum driving head of 0.21 feet. WATER QUALITY TREATMENT CALCULATIONS, CPS AND FLOW- SPLITTER SPECIFICATIONS FOLLOW • TOW /// •1 f H 11 Reoeveufwar Ara ik 7 t t *Joel r 42,o*, Aeiothrie. to" tmpetvutx45 (cce4Ser-WAVO ASSchme Te.z c (tosscaiaTio Fog. cr4 pioliscoks 6)v I: 0.313 cfs Oe•tig r4E i t- liseTosraE c .1=101• • • ..•••••' 449.37 illo5748* w AJP PARKWAY ---• 1i.0504 9 f.;U 41 43 1 4', 1 4 41111•1• 3 7 1 3 ' 1 3° I Arqsx rtle. ft -.••••• Jb&OTSte 1007 AP" MAN!, 1 __L 7,3 1 zi L .. 0. v " ' I r." .3 - Ts. eoe -z A . . .....",\...... I N.:.• . ,.. .. , • _:',.....".' '-"._ .•:., . " ._ . — Cif , File dAta Hydrograph Storage Discharge Level pool 3MMMPINMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMI1M!'1MMMM /13 3 INPUT, MODIFY OR BROWSE. DATA 3 3 BASIN ID REDEV SBUH HYDROGRAPH 3DESCRIPTION • REDEVELOPMENT AREA 2YR 3AREA (acres) 0.964 3RAIN ,PRECIP (in) ..: 1.95 3TIME INTERVAL(min ): 10.00 3TIME OF CONC (min): 5.00 .RAINFALL SELECTION: 1 3ABSTRACT COEFF... 0.20 3BASE FLOW (cfs) ...: 0.000 3STORM DUR (hrs)...: 24.000 3PERVIOU.S PARCEL IMPERVIOUS PARCEL 3AREA: 0.000 acres AREA 0.964 acres 3CN ..: 92.00 CN 98.00 3 3 SUMMARY DATA 3PEAK HYDROGRAPH TIME: 8.00 hrs SPEAK HYDROGRAPH FLOW: 0.3797 cfs :'TOTAL HYDROGRAPH VOL: 0.1380 ac -ft 3 HOME END F1:Find F2 :New F3:Get 3 Pgup Pgdn F6 :Compute F7: F8:Method STORM Peak Factor: 484.00 RAINFALL CHOICES 1 TYPE IA 2. TYPE I 3. TYPE I I 4. TYPE IIA 5. TYPE 3 6. USER 1 7. KC 7 DAY 8. CUSTOM • 3 SAY 0.38CFS = AR_ 3 memoirLop T F4:Tc -Calc F5:Delete 3 F9:Ternplate F10:Exit 3 TMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMI`I MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM? outpLTV 'Fr-0 tvt •• Wk )o? ' N` PizolV 9 Sort wA U 3 3 3 ' 3 3 3 . 3 3 3 3. 3 `, COALESCING PLATE STORMWATER SEPARATORS At . 1.11 ASP ,,00:41riet g few �� • Water Outlet Separator Vault Mfg. by PIpck. Incline Corrugated Plate Separator Media 1. Above Capacities are Based On 55 Degree Angle of Inclination 2. Larger Capacities are Available 3. Differing Design Flow Conditions May Alter Capacity P'1oPEL 3- I1 -�•5A 4��5 CAPAcr r or ZDo 4PI1 ^ O.4� 9 4.k • 4601 S. Orchard P.O. Box 9156 Tacoma, WA 98409 (206) 475-8888 (TAC) (206) 623.7772 (SEA) ( (206 ) )474.7631 ( ) (FAX) 755 N.E. Columbia Blvd. P.O. Box 11305 Portland, OR 97211 (503) 285-8391 (800) 634.0139 (WATS) (503) 286.0603 (FAX) Skimmer Outlet (Optional) Sludge Outlet C Water Inlet Flow Battle Pacific International Pipe Enterprises, Inc. This Is our most effective product for separating 'Free' oil from discharged water. The equipment generally consists of a precast vault, an Inclined corrugated plate separator module, settled sludge withdrawal piping and other associated piping. The usual application is the separation of 'tree' oil from stormwater runoff, equipment yard drains, wash down operations and similar events where oil may be present. 'Free' oil is present when simple gravity drainage occurs. When pumping of the oily water occurs, the oil present may be mechanically emulsified oil. Whenever detergents are employed for cleaning, the oil present may be chemically emulsified oil. Emulsified all removal (both mechanical and chemical) can be obtained by adding an optional floculator and other accessories to this unit. DESIGN FLOW CONDITIONS • Oil Specific Gravity = .85 • Operating Temperature = 50° F • Influent Oil Concentration =1500ppm • Effluent Concentration = 15ppm • Minimum Oil Droplet Removed = 60 microns Refer to the Design Manual for further information. 5032 Dallas Hwy. N.W. P.O. Box 5249 Salem, OR 97304 (503) 585-7350 (800) 452 -0339 (WATS) (503) 362-8526 (FAX) 55A. 1 P,65 ALL FLo to AP.x VE o • S 4 c.rs Sq. Ft. of Ellective Separation Capacity at AIO,S3 GPM/S0. FT. Model "A" "8" "C" Water Inlet Size Water Outlet Size 011 Outlet Size Sludge Outlet Size 25-SA 33 11 GPM 27' 62.1/2" 30" 4" 4" 2" 2" 466-SA 200 67 GPM 48" 72' 66" 4" 4" 2" 2" *77•SA 300 100 CPM 56" 84" 72" 6" 6" 2' 2" 577.6 -SA 3 600 200 GPM 56" 84" 72" 6" 6" 3" 3" 61 A 1200 400 GPM 82" 154" 89" 10" 10" 3" 3" 712 -SA 2400 800 GPM 92" 152" 98" 12" 12" 3" 3" 814 -10 -SA 3200 1066 GPM 115" 187" 128" 15" 15" 4" 4" 818 -10 -SA 4800 1367 GPM 138" 186" 129" 15" 15" 4" 4" COALESCING PLATE STORMWATER SEPARATORS At . 1.11 ASP ,,00:41riet g few �� • Water Outlet Separator Vault Mfg. by PIpck. Incline Corrugated Plate Separator Media 1. Above Capacities are Based On 55 Degree Angle of Inclination 2. Larger Capacities are Available 3. Differing Design Flow Conditions May Alter Capacity P'1oPEL 3- I1 -�•5A 4��5 CAPAcr r or ZDo 4PI1 ^ O.4� 9 4.k • 4601 S. Orchard P.O. Box 9156 Tacoma, WA 98409 (206) 475-8888 (TAC) (206) 623.7772 (SEA) ( (206 ) )474.7631 ( ) (FAX) 755 N.E. Columbia Blvd. P.O. Box 11305 Portland, OR 97211 (503) 285-8391 (800) 634.0139 (WATS) (503) 286.0603 (FAX) Skimmer Outlet (Optional) Sludge Outlet C Water Inlet Flow Battle Pacific International Pipe Enterprises, Inc. This Is our most effective product for separating 'Free' oil from discharged water. The equipment generally consists of a precast vault, an Inclined corrugated plate separator module, settled sludge withdrawal piping and other associated piping. The usual application is the separation of 'tree' oil from stormwater runoff, equipment yard drains, wash down operations and similar events where oil may be present. 'Free' oil is present when simple gravity drainage occurs. When pumping of the oily water occurs, the oil present may be mechanically emulsified oil. Whenever detergents are employed for cleaning, the oil present may be chemically emulsified oil. Emulsified all removal (both mechanical and chemical) can be obtained by adding an optional floculator and other accessories to this unit. DESIGN FLOW CONDITIONS • Oil Specific Gravity = .85 • Operating Temperature = 50° F • Influent Oil Concentration =1500ppm • Effluent Concentration = 15ppm • Minimum Oil Droplet Removed = 60 microns Refer to the Design Manual for further information. 5032 Dallas Hwy. N.W. P.O. Box 5249 Salem, OR 97304 (503) 585-7350 (800) 452 -0339 (WATS) (503) 362-8526 (FAX) 55A. 1 P,65 ALL FLo to AP.x VE o • S 4 c.rs File ''''dAta HYdrograph Storage Discharge Level pool pmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmvoirimmtvivvivItoovomfmtvomitimmitimpimplyoffivimmmmmmmmma 3 MULTIPLE ORIFICE 3 3 DISCHARGE STRUCTURE ID:DIVTR 3 3 3 3Name: 2YR RUNOFF DIVERTER 3 3Peak Dsgn Release Rate: 0.00 cfs Orif /flow/elev 3 30rifice Coefficient...: 0.62 Dia (in)/cfs/ ft 3 3Lowest Orifice Dia (in)..: 6.00 6.00 0.45 cfs 3 3 3Second Orifice Dia (in)..: 0.00 3 3h2: 2nd to 3rd Orifice...: 0.00 3 3Third Orifice Dia (in)..: 0.00 3 3h1 Outlet to 2nd Orifice: 0.00 ,3h3: 3rd to 4th Orifice...: 0.00 3 31- Orifice Dia (in)..: 0.00 3 3h4: 4th to 5th Orifice...: 0.00 3 3Top Orifice Dia (in). 0.00 3 3 3Elevation of Lowest Orifice....: 24.293 Lai (1 , v . z ..2 4 . 04 ) 3 30utlet Elevation.. . ..... . • . 24 . 29 CE131114)" 3 M 2440 _24, , I ax Elev Above Outlet • 24 SO 3 3Stage Increment.. ...... 0.10 ' 3 3 Av3PGUP PGDN F3 Get F6 Delete F10: Exit 3 C u Tlitlfrititititilitlift0114MMIVIIIIMMNfrITINMMM1411MMMtititikititlfrIMMIIMMtltIMPINtilltititititititIMPlilkitIMMil.> 3 • V441 ge 12fals4) Ltw:rr t)1Se-4404- (0 4 rtr - ro 4f5 OiLl • PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS 14=0421 1 I 9 CALCULATED BY 710111ictos DATE &I-T/41- I I I • I I 1 ; 1 1 I : ; • ; I I 1 I I i ! i , .. I • i 1 1 I i ,................. t t " i i I i I JOS DMAct. 5re • q700Z SHEET NO. OF r - ; , I ■ . I : i I . ■ ; .: ' 4 0 C ..p .24.017.1'.. ..,... : i 1 To 0'5 , , , , • , 1 , . : • : , • i i , ... 1 . .. .i.. .. . I i .)( 130 ANDOVER PARK EAST, SUITE 300 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 (206) 431-7970 FAX: 431-7975 ! . .. : ft, x".", at " ,• ,•••••" •••• - • !! i • ' i- —;---i-_=7:74: ; 7 . 7, . 57 fetVae- • --7 , I -1. - 1 - - ... i ::i::::: , .1 ' .4) t 1 034 ? 't6',4-e..61).TW Project Info Project Address sovTBCrnsER minx Date 5/23/97 =WILL WA For Budding Department Use RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 0 1997 PERMIT CENTER OUTBACK lTEA1mODSE RESTAURANT Applicant Name: Merrick Lents Archit.ct Applicant Address: 1soo - 136th Place, suit. 100, Bellevue, WA Applicant Phone: (42S) 747 -3177 g g g Location Allowed (floor /room no.) Occupancy Description Watts per ft Area in ft Allowed x Area Restaurant /Bar 1.00 4491.0 4491.0 6303 OF Total - 1611 OF rood Prep Exempt Area Allowed Watts Area in ft Allowed Watts Location Description per ft or per If (or If for perimeter) x ft (or x If) Covered Parking 0.2 W/ft rroposea Lignung wattage (Interior) tmay not 'mono 1 01121 NIIUWVU vvtuw run nunnun) Location Number of Watts/ Watts (floor /room no.) Fixture Description Fixtures Fixture Proposed Type A3 2x4 (3 -TS lamp.) Fluorescent Trotter- Elect. Ballast 2 93.0 186.0 Type A4 2x4 (4 -TS lamp.) Fluorescent Troffer- Elect. Ballast 1 114.0 114.0 Type e2 4' (2 -TS lamps) Fluor. Wraparound- Elect. Ballast r 5 62.0 310.0 Type C and C2 12• RLM Incandescent reflector, pendant and arm mount J . 34 25.0 850.0 Type D 16• RLM Incandescent reflector, pendant and ass mount 13 40.0 520.0 Type E (30) 40 watt Incand. Wall Nastier - Exempt Display Lts. Type F 40 watt rated Incandescent Downlight 37 40.0 1480.0 (27) 40 watt Inoand. Downlight in exempt Food Prep Area Type F1 13W PL Lamp Compact Fluorescent Downlight 17 18.0 306.0 Type 0 2' (2-TO lamp.) Fluorescent Mirror Light -Elec. Ballast 2 33.0 66.0 Type (1 Paddle Fan - No lamps � Type I Illinated Exit Signs with Battery Back -up - Exempt Type Y Emergency Egress Dual Spots with Battery Back -up - Exempt Type Y2 Emergency Egress Dual Spot. with Battery Back -up - Exempt Type EL Emergency Egress Single Spat with Meter Battery - Exempt Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior Total Proposed Watts 3832.0 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Fort C EI VE0 JUN Lighting Summary LTG -SUM 1994 Washington NarnNidsI u Fmm Energy Cod. Comperrs Maximum Allowed Lihtin Watta (Interior From Table 15-1 (over) - document all exceptions on form LTG -LPA • Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) • 1 1997 June. (995 Project Description I ® New Building ❑ Addition ❑ Akeration Compliance Option l O Prescriptive Lighting Power Allowance 0 Systems Analysis (See Qualification Checldist (over). Indicate Prescriptive & LPA spaces clearly on plans.) Alteration Exceptions (check appropriate box) ❑ No changes are being made to the lighting ❑ Less than 60% of the fixtures are new, and installed lighting wattage is not being increased otal Allowed Watts 4491.0 Allowed Watts Area in ft Allowed Watts Location Description per ft or per If (or If for perimeter) x ft (or x If) Covered Parking 0.2 W/ft rroposea Lignung wattage (Interior) tmay not 'mono 1 01121 NIIUWVU vvtuw run nunnun) Location Number of Watts/ Watts (floor /room no.) Fixture Description Fixtures Fixture Proposed Type A3 2x4 (3 -TS lamp.) Fluorescent Trotter- Elect. Ballast 2 93.0 186.0 Type A4 2x4 (4 -TS lamp.) Fluorescent Troffer- Elect. Ballast 1 114.0 114.0 Type e2 4' (2 -TS lamps) Fluor. Wraparound- Elect. Ballast r 5 62.0 310.0 Type C and C2 12• RLM Incandescent reflector, pendant and arm mount J . 34 25.0 850.0 Type D 16• RLM Incandescent reflector, pendant and ass mount 13 40.0 520.0 Type E (30) 40 watt Incand. Wall Nastier - Exempt Display Lts. Type F 40 watt rated Incandescent Downlight 37 40.0 1480.0 (27) 40 watt Inoand. Downlight in exempt Food Prep Area Type F1 13W PL Lamp Compact Fluorescent Downlight 17 18.0 306.0 Type 0 2' (2-TO lamp.) Fluorescent Mirror Light -Elec. Ballast 2 33.0 66.0 Type (1 Paddle Fan - No lamps � Type I Illinated Exit Signs with Battery Back -up - Exempt Type Y Emergency Egress Dual Spots with Battery Back -up - Exempt Type Y2 Emergency Egress Dual Spot. with Battery Back -up - Exempt Type EL Emergency Egress Single Spat with Meter Battery - Exempt Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior Total Proposed Watts 3832.0 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Fort C EI VE0 JUN Lighting Summary LTG -SUM 1994 Washington NarnNidsI u Fmm Energy Cod. Comperrs Maximum Allowed Lihtin Watta (Interior From Table 15-1 (over) - document all exceptions on form LTG -LPA • Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) • 1 1997 June. (995 Project Description I ® New Building ❑ Addition ❑ Akeration Compliance Option l O Prescriptive Lighting Power Allowance 0 Systems Analysis (See Qualification Checldist (over). Indicate Prescriptive & LPA spaces clearly on plans.) Alteration Exceptions (check appropriate box) ❑ No changes are being made to the lighting ❑ Less than 60% of the fixtures are new, and installed lighting wattage is not being increased otal Allowed Watts 4491.0 rroposea Lignung wattage (Interior) tmay not 'mono 1 01121 NIIUWVU vvtuw run nunnun) Location Number of Watts/ Watts (floor /room no.) Fixture Description Fixtures Fixture Proposed Type A3 2x4 (3 -TS lamp.) Fluorescent Trotter- Elect. Ballast 2 93.0 186.0 Type A4 2x4 (4 -TS lamp.) Fluorescent Troffer- Elect. Ballast 1 114.0 114.0 Type e2 4' (2 -TS lamps) Fluor. Wraparound- Elect. Ballast r 5 62.0 310.0 Type C and C2 12• RLM Incandescent reflector, pendant and arm mount J . 34 25.0 850.0 Type D 16• RLM Incandescent reflector, pendant and ass mount 13 40.0 520.0 Type E (30) 40 watt Incand. Wall Nastier - Exempt Display Lts. Type F 40 watt rated Incandescent Downlight 37 40.0 1480.0 (27) 40 watt Inoand. Downlight in exempt Food Prep Area Type F1 13W PL Lamp Compact Fluorescent Downlight 17 18.0 306.0 Type 0 2' (2-TO lamp.) Fluorescent Mirror Light -Elec. Ballast 2 33.0 66.0 Type (1 Paddle Fan - No lamps � Type I Illinated Exit Signs with Battery Back -up - Exempt Type Y Emergency Egress Dual Spots with Battery Back -up - Exempt Type Y2 Emergency Egress Dual Spot. with Battery Back -up - Exempt Type EL Emergency Egress Single Spat with Meter Battery - Exempt Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior Total Proposed Watts 3832.0 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Fort C EI VE0 JUN Lighting Summary LTG -SUM 1994 Washington NarnNidsI u Fmm Energy Cod. Comperrs Maximum Allowed Lihtin Watta (Interior From Table 15-1 (over) - document all exceptions on form LTG -LPA • Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) • 1 1997 June. (995 Project Description I ® New Building ❑ Addition ❑ Akeration Compliance Option l O Prescriptive Lighting Power Allowance 0 Systems Analysis (See Qualification Checldist (over). Indicate Prescriptive & LPA spaces clearly on plans.) Alteration Exceptions (check appropriate box) ❑ No changes are being made to the lighting ❑ Less than 60% of the fixtures are new, and installed lighting wattage is not being increased otal Allowed Watts 4491.0 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Fort C EI VE0 JUN Lighting Summary LTG -SUM 1994 Washington NarnNidsI u Fmm Energy Cod. Comperrs Maximum Allowed Lihtin Watta (Interior From Table 15-1 (over) - document all exceptions on form LTG -LPA • Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) • 1 1997 June. (995 Project Description I ® New Building ❑ Addition ❑ Akeration Compliance Option l O Prescriptive Lighting Power Allowance 0 Systems Analysis (See Qualification Checldist (over). Indicate Prescriptive & LPA spaces clearly on plans.) Alteration Exceptions (check appropriate box) ❑ No changes are being made to the lighting ❑ Less than 60% of the fixtures are new, and installed lighting wattage is not being increased otal Allowed Watts 4491.0 - Location - Fbture Descripbon Number of Fbtures Watts/ Figure Watts Proposed Deers Type D2.16• PLY Ineend. reflector. aria mount 5 40.0 200.0 Soffit Type 12.40w rated Taceadesoent toconalt w/ dew label 28 40.0 1.120 .0 Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exterior Total Proposed Watts 1320 .0 .1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form Open Panting outdoor Ames Bldg: (by facade) Bldg. (by perim) Note: for building exterior, choose either the facade area or the perimeter method, but nct both) 0.2 WM!, : o.2wift 0.25 Wift 7.5 Wilt 320.0 Total Allowed Writs 240040 2400.0 Proposed Lightin Wattage (Exterior) (May not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exterior) Lighting Permit Plans Checklist LTG -CHK 1 N/ Washington spar Energy Cede Comeenc. Fame Jur. 11S5 Project Address sovtacENrsta rraaRSaxr rate 5/23/97 The following information is necessary to check a lighting permit application for compliance with the lighting requirements in the 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code. Applicabilky (yes, no, n.a.) I Code Section 'Component ,Information Required ( I Location Plans on Building Notes Department LIGHTING CONTROLS (Section 1513 yes 1513.1 Local control/access Schedule with type, indicate locations E -2 yea 1513.2 Artie controls Maximum Limit per switch E-2,3 1513.3 Daylight zone control Schedule with type and features, indicate locations y.. vertical glazing Indicate vertical glazing on plans E -3 overhead glazing Indicate overhead glazing on plans yes 1513.4 Dlspiay /eiib/specisl Indicate separate controls E -2, 3 1513.5 Exterior shut -off Schedule with type and features, indicate location y.. (a) timer w/backup Indicate location E -2 (b) photocell. ` Indicate location 1513.6 Inter. auto shut -off Indicate location 1513.6.1 (a) occup. sensors Schedule with type and locations - 1513.6.2 (b) auto. switches Schedule with type and features (back -up, override capability); Indicate size of zone on plans Yes Lighting Sum. Form Completed and attached. Schedule with future types, lamps, ballasts, watts per fixture E -2 — I IElec motor efficiency IMECH -MOT or Equipment Schedule with hp, rpm, efficiency If "no" is circled for any question, provide explanation: Building Permit Plans Checklist ENV -CHK Ma UL .. Siam fervan war Enemy Gov C.waue. Poses Sense Eaw, - ass t al a Prolert /bores Oal• The foliating informatlan Is necessary to check a building permit application for compliance with me baiting envelope requirements in the Washington Slats Nonresidential Energy Code. Appacabay (dice) Cats Setdlort Component Information Required Location cn Plans Buiding Department Noes GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (Sections 1301 -1314) 1301 Scope unconaitionea spaces identified on plans if allowed 1312 Space neat type yes m a.a. 'Electric rnce yes no a.a. Omer Indicate on plans that eiecnc resistance neat is not allowed y.e no n.a. 1310.2 Semi - netted spaces Semi- neaten spaces iaenufiea on plans rf allowed 1311 Insulation Yea ao a.a. 1311.1 Instil. utsrallation Imamate Densities and clearances yes no a.a. 1311.2 Roof /ceiling in t. Inacate A -value on roof sectons for attics and other roofs; Indicate clearances for attic insulation; Indicate baffles if save vents installed; Indicate face stapling of faced bans yes no n.a. 1311.3 ' Wall insulation Inacate A -value on wail secions; Indicate face stapling of Laced bans; Indicate above grade exterior insulation is prcocted; Indicate loose -fill core insulation for masonry walls as netts; Indicate heat capacity of masonry walls if masonry option is used or it credit taken in ENVSTD; yea to a.a. 1 11.4 oor rnsutaftn Inacate - -value on floor sections; Indicate substantial contact with surface; Indicate supports not more than 24' o.c.; Indicate that insulation does not block airflow through foundation vents yes no n.a. 1311.5 S4taon -gra0e floor Inaicam R -value on wail seAOn or foundanon oetalt Indicate slab insulation extends down vertically 24' from top; Indicate above grade exterior insutadon is protec'ed Yon no a.a. 13114 Radiant floor Inmate A -value on wall sec on or fourtaanon meat Indicate slab Insulation extends down verUcaNy 36' from ttie top1 Indicate above grade exterior Insuladon Lt prafrac Irldiate irtsulatlan atso under ent re slab where regld. by Ofbciai y.. ao a.a. 1312 Glaang and doors Prtmde caicutacon of glaang area (I naudtng vertical and ovemead) as percent of grass wail area yes no n.a. 1312.1 U factors Indicate glaang and door U fa ctors on gtaang ono door schedule (provide area - weighted caiaia a1s as necessary); Indicate 11 values are NFRC or default if vaiuee ate default then specfy frame type, glazing layers, gapwiddi, low-e coatings, gas fillings yam ao a.a. 13122 SHGC & SC Innate glaang solar neat gain coetflaent or snaking coetffcent on glazing schedule (provide are.- weighted calartations as necessary) 1313 Masai rs control yes no :i.e.. 1313,1 Vapor tarenlera I nmcate vapor retafders on warm side yes no a.a. 1313.2 Root/ceiling vacant. inalata vapor retarder on root sector; Indicate vap, retard. with sealed seams for rani -wood strut yes no n.a. 1313.3 Wall vapor retarder I nalate vapor retarder on wall section yap no a.a. 1313.4 Floor vapor reorder Indicate vapor retarder on floor section yes no n.a. 1313.5 Crawl spa00 vap. ref. Inocate six mil beck poryetnyiene ovenapped 12' on ground 1314 Air teaiage Yew no a .a. 1314.1 BWg. envd. seeiing i ndicate sealing, caulking, gasxeang, and wearttersmtxxng yes no a.a. 13142 Glaztngrcioorswing Inacateweatherstripping yes no a.a. 1314.3 Assernd. as ducts Inacate sealing, caulking and daunting PRESCRIPTIVE/COMPONENT PERFORMANCE (Sections 1320 -23 or 1330-34) y.. no Envelope Sum. Form Completed ano attacnea. Provide component performance worksheet if necessary Provide ENVSTD screen 1 output if necessary 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form RECEIVED JUN 1 1 1997 If ° no''Ts circled for any question, provide explanation: RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN a `) 199? PERMIT CENTER Envelope Requirements (enter values as applicable) Fully tweremilcooied space Minimum irisuielion R-valuee Roots Over Attic Glazing Area Calculation Now arrow grade sale may be included In aso Gross Extorior Wall Area if they are Inseam to the level orquired for opaque wins. Total Glazing Ms.. (rough oPonki9) (verdial a averhd) Gross Exterior divided by Wall Area All Other Roofs 4731- r15' R2.1 Opaque Walls Concrete/Masonry Option R•19 Below Grade Walls Floors Over Unconditioned Space Slate-on-Grade R I 0 Radiant Floors Maximum U-fa Opaque Doors , 60 Vertical Glazing • 90 Cvertieed Glazing Maximo! SHGC (or SC) Venical/Cverheed Glazing 1 I. 0 Space Heat Type CI Sectric Resistance la AM other (see over for ciedinitions) Glazing Area Calculation Now arrow grade sale may be included In aso Gross Extorior Wall Area if they are Inseam to the level orquired for opaque wins. Total Glazing Ms.. (rough oPonki9) (verdial a averhd) Gross Exterior divided by Wall Area times 100 Gouts % Glazing 4731- r15' -i-. 35 3 41 x 100 = 7.4 Concrete/Masonry Option CIChere here if using this option and II pronlet mots ail roquirannras for the Conzataaamonry Colon. Son Dodzion Flowchart(over) for Ervirer tor each weerebtr in ire obi. brim. quelliceions. ',outsmarts queNying 1994 Washington State Nonresidents' Energy Code Compliance Form Envelope Summary Climate Zone 1 ENV-SUM tow woronfoo Ss. morwoorponso &'' CI Comossor hoop swam EMI= -Amur leMI Project Info ForMect Address Appicant Name Appecant Addis= Applicant Phone For Budding Department Use Project Description At New Building C3 Adam C3 Alteration [I Change ot Use Compliance Option A Prescripdve Comment Perlomtance (See Decision Flowchart (over) for qualifications) ENVSTD CI Systems Analysis Semi-hosted spaar Minimum Insuielion A-values Roots Over Sone-Heated Spaces' *Rater to Section 1310 for quaificadons and requirements Notes: Opaque ConcredelAasomy Wan Requirements Insulation on Interior - maximum U-betor Is 0.19 Insulator+ an eidetic( or Integral maim= U-factor is • 25 If project qualifies for ConavtatMesortry Option. with HC 9.0 Citu/IPeff below (other walls must Opaque Wall requirements). Use from Table 20-5b in the Code. Wail Description (Including Insulation R-value NA II-factor Cooling Equipment Schedule E p. ID Brand Name' - Model No.' T Capedty Total CFM OSA CFM Eno SEER or EER IPLV t ocatlon ,4 C - 1 LUx4 IR3 QUC '30,000 33..0:3 eccrr -. 8.9 — Rapp- AC-2 . L11 A IRE. _ DVCO9O 0 ' 3400 E () . 9 _ -- Rom AC-3 Ll1>NA , _0000 90 .9-0,c0 3400 cry,,a , cii ,.9 , -- r •C • . . e DUC12• r 1 P '-' , 4coo , Er-om •,• _ — Ron 1 /4 1 o cV CV Roof= Ce,'1r EF -6 Bvo" /62 7 , /" Fan Epment Schedule Equip. ID Brand Name' Model No.' CFM SP' HP/BHP Flow commis Location of Service EF -1 Sup rerle G G D -182 920 L SI' 3 CV Roo- krt_ :;v ER-a. 1 U 1 3C -182 31 S;7 .7.5 " /• S' C V ROOF- KTcNL EF•3 .1 Ler U I3C -182. z8s'o .75" /•c c for..) - Kt rcfrieDV EF-1 Ten F4t4 19OA =1J13 1D 1000 . 5-11 14 cV Ro0P F F-S T.e;,v, FA-h 120'4 -NOCR 600 ,4" 1 /4 1 o cV CV Roof= Ce,'1r EF -6 Bvo" /62 7 , /" Heating Equipment Schedule Brand Name' Model No.' Capedty Total CFM OSA ctm E,cono Input Stull Output 8tuh Efficiency` Equip. ID AC-1 LUX tKE DOCn0 — 3100 Fccw,v 1E3,000 130,000 /3C,c0; g0l 60 /o AC-? , L»<AleE: Duos) , — 34 3400 Er 1c , 16 3,00 AC L064 11:E Q00090 — 3400 Ercno 4 /63,Cao /30,co0 SOLD AC-4 , LocAIRE 0 VC 120 , — 4000 r4 -xt 2 1,c� /63, 807 Mechanical Summary MECH -SUM t.., rr....rw.r.r sn.a,, cow a...w.. F s Project Info Protect Address Applicant Name Appllarn Address Applicant Phone: Dal For Building Dept. Use Project Description Briefly deecfbe mechanical system type and features. UKT,07 -y 1200P oV' P/tc (C1 ,45 b T6r/ EZ C- (LG ) Compliance Option 1994 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Cale Compliance Form Simple System 0 Complex System 0 systems Analysis (See Decision F1owdts t (over) tor qualifications) saw* soma • Aws ,we Equipment Schedules The following information is required to be incorporated with the mechanical equipment schedules on the plans. For poor without putts, ill In the reputed Irtfomtatlon below. 2 It required. ` COP, HSPF, Combustion Efficiency, or AFUE, as applicable. 'if available. 2 As tested according to Tattle 14-1, 14-2 or 14-3. ' Flow types VAV,_oonstant volume, or variable speed. I EF -7 I t3v -0.-w 1 1 6 - 7 L ft. Ili, C✓ j CQ 111.04 Project Address IOr The bYowirg inlormadon Is necessary to Meek a mechanical wrist application for oompdance with die matu rd + iquker rrfb In the Washington State Nonm s$dential Energy Coda. ef90 (circle) Code Seddon Camoon.nt Information Required Logsdon on Plans [crrtdfrlp Cepertment Notes - ► - - . t - ► ;0 •r 1 - 1 . 4 1411 Eapmt p.m3mlenOe r a.a. 1411.1 Minimum efficiency �E SCUM* sa. wit?) type, N efficiency efficiency . M ye ✓ ✓ ✓ a r 1411.1 Pkg. e. mg. & Cg.. sm. isi neat pumpll on sa1.0wI � 1412 HVAC contras • yen as a.a. 14121 T.mp•fattue MISS 1n0icate IOCaDOIS On plans ...' as a.a. 14 >G •'TiTr- coned r^ - r oag(SS • .. • minIIum M so sera. 1412.3 Hume:sty conttot In0iea1s nurrlaisot -- (yea as a.a. 1412.4 IWIOmatiC MUCK Income o smlostat YAM night WIDOW and 7 cliff. clay types - 1 , as a.a. 1412.4.1 Campers Inalaoa Camper IOQxK111 MO aunllW ni k C Cone M - - yea r al 1412.5 Heat pump 0=01 Int ce etal k:am microprocessor On thermoses' I0 e --- s• yea r 1+. 1412.5 ComousOOn nlq. Indicate moculating or staged COMM -- ;irate se a.a. 1412.7. BalsnCrng Indcate =slang f.MMWea on plans . M - =- yea se i.a) 1422 Th•nnoetit In1u110CX 1n0iate 1t smioait tnanoCK an C Ms '^ y., as a.a. 1423 - Economizers Equipment scrawls wls M i 1413 Alt eoortorrpsers a. a.a. 1413.1 Operation Imitate 100% capa0ity► on schedule M - / se a.a. 1413.2 Cart= InolcatIe 03(1=16 104 tO.valumis C M de arm (-y - 1 you as i.al. - 1413.3. C aacl operation Imitate oaOlity for pear coding a -- 1414 systems ' as a. a. 1414.1 ouot Q �rwlation Maces sealing necessary M -1 a. 4.4. 1414.2 ' � Duo Mow R-vaIus of Insulation on dud Js,-1 as SA, 1415.1 Piping insulation MOONS A-valim Of insulation an doing N1 -I We. an 4.4; 1424 Separate air syz. Indicate seesaw systems on pure —' � ■/ ae Meat. Sum. Font Completed ado attar 1s0. Equipment schedule with types, inpuVoutput. efficiency, dm, hp, economizer SERVICE VATEA HEATING AND HEATED POOLS (Sections 1440 -1454) 1440 Sawa water htp. y.. so all. 1441 Elec. water WINK Indicate R•10 insutat= un0er troll .�.. yes as i ... 1442 Shut -oft =WOW Ingkats automatic Shut -Off - � - ' '-- 1450 Heated pools yea s. l4,,4. 1452 Pod water heaters Indcate not electric resistance " - y.a as a,y. 1453 Pod heater COMMIS Inalcate swoon and 55 degree Conti — y.. as .a.a. 1454 Pod covers Indicate vapor rwroant cover -.-- . yea no a.et 1454 Pools 90► degrees _ Indicate R -12 poolcover -- 1994..Washington State Nonresidential Energy Goth Coat liancs'Farm Mechanical Permit Plans Checklist ,ee wa alion star «r..s...r BIS p Coat Cam msnm Penne MECH -CHK IMMO NOM AVM 1 no we re for any question, provide explanation: I 4.1 Peism,t' ; : Z � �' I �.. _... ... 3. a .. v_.. 1 t ,� t r i i , r M t i • VOELKER ENGINEERING, INC. 1211 Market Street KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 (206) 8274197 FAX (206) 828.3019 .....�I.. w 90,4` ft p1o0o0TtadlSaoMSMsl0001 MOM r 7a ING,aMrum 014/1100010io TOLL NILL1100maa ,OS ChM5ACK- 4.2077.4 C JT Z !7Z r SHEET NO. OF DATE DATE CALCULATED BY CHECKEDSY SCALE G � ST OF CITY TUKWILA JUN 0 91997 PERMIT CENTER rke 541 S A x 2474/10 . ..? - 6 - 71 14 6 es t A / " 297 970440 9 /2o /e 7 ' 5 /2o /q/ 2 las^ 1- )o I EXPIRES 9/2119h 1 Cql VOELKER ENGINEERING, INC. 1211 Market Street KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 (206) 827.0197 FAX (206) 828.3019 101000C1204.11S.44 Pohl 20S 1100k4001( 7.1m. fiats Was 01411 10010w MI IOU 1>rf 1404204M JOB r) 4-04 SHEET NO 2 OF CALCULATED BY G ✓ /ix.1 DATE S/ 20 /T 7 CHECKED BY ST DATE 5/2-0 7 SCALE 1 7 0 9 3 ' ) v . / / • . . i 1 1 1 i : i ti l' e- . ∎ ∎ _ a _... 01. .. ..__ ................ . . .1� .6��10 "r':'. . 1.. ..: .... ...:.... . i i • • . �.: ..... � ` Q - i t t , : .Y b g. f ... .. 385. 5/ :. ...... : • i .._........4 t ....._.._.._ _._.._ A 5 1/ VOELKER ENGINEERING, INC. 1211 Market Street KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 (206) 827-0197 FAX (206) 828.3019 PIVOUCI p.(( S. WrO rb)MI(Mad)r7.rc.WooMass 01111 T.a1I+ IIOU Ix(I- ?1143 ae O"r '4G![- Oac.TN vrtrz -- SHEET NO OF CALCULATED BY G cro+ CHECKED BY SZ DATE l'/w /97 DATE 5 /2a iq 17 SCALE how ; lAadeie 2 . U i t 1 . i i I i a 4 r v i .i i I 1 f i .... i j li I 1 • I i 7 t j i J�OI1 �Z0Zy!' E ' (..'(1 l!�sX �O7 L� G7,p 4e/z- 0 +2- . 145067S1 ✓ L 8C)1, t14;. -, b. P s r • 1 F3,5 w r �k�Z Ca (A✓ 3 J t. / 2 31 27g0 # o,14h 4 7.2 . . ! - 3 - / Lct-0.15) 4 - ;13 „ TL 4 5' �9u P G)y 4►y 6 $ di VOELKER ENGINEERING, INC. 1211 Market Street KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 (206) 827.0197 FAX (206) 828.3019 PROMO 201115•14 Vow XSi hoop AAnw /. Inc Grow Um01111io ROE T t0 ISoomabo Joe 0a eo- Sd eir - - '7 70T SHEET NO 4 OF CALCULATED BY C /17G- CHECKED BY Si- DATE 5 /z'9 7 DATE S /Z 0%1 SCALE i I. f/ , e & - Pc TF4- SlbeS 1 44.444 = 6.671- z r / 3 379 : /3, 3.79 1 9 e 2 - X / 2 7 • x..._........%..7....3,.2 <o /.96 .. /.Zt3 ' ...._. ...._;.... • SPisme ! .: • 4 .6 7 t 571 PGl' zs ,3 • c 1 3: 3• 80� e 4” eze, /1 „ = 706 ft-F v, , VOELKER ENGINEERING, INC. 1211 Market Street KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 (206) 827-0197 FAX (206) 828.3019 PMOUCI 20I 115 Pats1 04i1POddd1/A rlorc.G * Man0111l00dr M*IOU10fI1600 Joe sorirfL,l-tTty. -. 1709 SHEET NO 0 CALCULATED BY e ✓ 11::C1 DATE 5/ ,/'7 1 CHECKED BY ST DATE -S /•°/ - 7 SCALE OF 4v /ea .....:... i i S i r i i «_. i F IJPL -/FT . Ta . �'7=T 4‘4414 3, 75 /wAU. ..:....... 4. /'6 _ 40, B© oT * .3,75 > r 24 Ea ' /307.6. iti/€ t�'7Z. r 7o 7 4- /4 ),e) 4.,) x 3.757 .• /2 37 4' / 6)r„, U- :. ? 121.1g 6K t ... i ii. lit .;GA C.. ... . Go' u. ._ ......... ......:............... . . .. . . .. 4. S :. ,.. I 1 33 . 4 .67 ....� r * _1$ 4. O. _t . �> f ,17 - ` 7 / 37 ¢Z' (ime oN Nrz) c w -5 �Fuow : 5 250 ' d w/ dp8A) • < ... i .. e r/ 246 ' 71-/ ' 7 //b "056 8dC4 ° . 4 40(4-'1) - = 353 P(4= ° '``1 Less 7-m4".1 /c) ' Voeikor Engineering, Inc. 1211 Market Street Kirkland, NA 98033 1994 U.B.C. Section 2308 Wood Stud Design Ver 2.2 CVE1995 INPUT Axial P = 750.0 (lb /ft) Wind w = 12.0 (psf) Stud B = 1.5 (in) Stud D = 5.50 (in) Spacing = 1.33 (ft oc) KL = 14.00 (ft) F'c _ • 361 (psi) P allow = 2978 (lb) Load per Stud: P = 997.5 (lbs) M = 391.0 (lb -ft) Axial Loading OUTPUT Combined Axial and Bending Loads Deflection at midspan = 0.55 (in) L/ 304 2 X 6 HF #2 STUDS ® 16 "o.c. (Full wind /Half snow) E = 1200 (psi) Fc = 880 (psi) Fb = 1009 (psi) Cd = 1.60 % A = 8.25 (in •F *c = 1408 (psi) • KL /D = 30, I = 20.80 (in"4) F *b = 1614 (psi) Fce = 385.84 S = 7.56 (inA3) z = 0.796 Computed Stress: fc = 121 (psi) fb = 620 (psi) fc /F'c = 0.33 < 1 O.K. Axial "2 + Bending = Total 0.11 0.56 0.67 < 1 O.K. fc /Fce = 0.31 < 1 O.K. Job # 97094. Sheet ,O Kce = 0.300 c' = 0.80 141000CIAM 1 13440 SNOW% 1 IPINI•el silpw;Ut&.1 T tsitid ......� ................ t e, = p• - 't (10 (2 VOELKER ENGINEERING, INC. 1211 Market Street KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 (206) 827.0197 FAX (206) 828.3019 i or wick NOW lI LL41Lam) Pew vec, 0041.s F10 .. -t S l. x .. $oyo !_ x .. 4 ...... 4 5o 2 .-1- 6 -i %.5, • x 5d %. • ' i • I (2s ) 1. 414 = { 11° � � i { ?AA- i ., ......y. .......j... _...... Ji . =!.. . . �. + ..6 ......_S....trL) • 1 j .................. . f Mw,avM.vaa . OIjr GAWK. - :::'U" E1'L JOB SCALE 41.4 r � . ` •. NeGL' il..taLs SHEET NO • CALCULATED BY ST CHECKED BY r e., II A� S + roc � Vr • OF 910(01 DATE a . 20 . 1 1 DATE RECEIVED SFP fn 4 1997 m. rte: v I ct;t:`R F rossI H ASSOC. t . s VOELKER ENGINEERING, INC. 1211 Market Street KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98033 (206) 827-0197 FAX (206) 828 -3019 C -1-1C2D` -Foece GNELk T CASE L�F"(' /121GN 1 3 2G 1!00 qa' ) C1 �EGK D94 F0124. ; 240,1k:0 ' - 0./ •• , OV E Z ►s.S 1clek:F1- 2iS odd:. rOIC•. GI- -D ( 1 2 ‘ d ( 12'c p s Ic (' 233'0 Ito TD 12 AA Stt20 2 z 1 144 (: =) ?0:90 Lb.: 1661 it 0 .d39 03/11333 PRODUCT 204.1 1540, SPRI10 205, (P ) (16 r,r,9 JOB OuT5Ae-K 91061 SHEET NO. I CALCULATED BY Sr CHECKED BY DATE ' SCALE • oteA.oe• it, et co6.4■40ia KF 42 $ 1►•wUC SNEillfz, ` Z! ' 13516(1.53 ) '1 , "I L f'geLIcE OF (1'0 tlodk •• (?) C-SIa. i,u o 2)(4= 131-ocw1P.IGI . DATE 8 ' 2 . ° I ACTIVITY NUMBER PROJECT NAME D P TMENT: B ItD G DIVISION ❑ t i i WORKS �� q- ql DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (T,Th) COMPLETE (� NOT COMPLETE ❑ COMMENTS TUES /THURS ROUTING: PLEASE ROUTE E ROUTED BY STAFF n (If routed by staff, make copy to master file & enter Sierra.) REVIEWERS INITIAL REVIEWERS INITIAL REVIEWERS INITIAL C:ROUTE -F ZIiniF cord C �4/ PLAN REVIEW / ROUTING SLIP c c -- cD DATE 9 B 97 N ° • Il�E� El STRU DATE APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) APPROVED n APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS ❑ DATE CORRECTION DETERMINATION: APPROVED ❑ APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS ❑ DATE DUE DATE PLANNING DIVISION 0 E IT COORDINATOR NOT APPLICABLE ❑ (Correc +' NO FURTHER REVIEW REQUIRED ❑ 1 2 DUE DATE q a3 97 NOT APPROVED (attach comments) ❑ DUE DATE NOT APPROVED (attach comments) ❑ (Certification of occupancy required. ) J M1 ACTIVITY NUMBER PROJECT NAME DEPARTMENT: BUILDING DIVISION • PUBLIC WORKS L l'13 ItIZ'a' ,L?y �'.r..AFawx7t kl: ??l�.6 rte `Yy:0 ;i fit 1 ...4; .Vrtiv?rt,fokomar mt ew,.6v,,.<.r, PLAN REVIEW / ROUTING SLIP ocn qo DATE FIRE PREVENTION STRUCTURAL 1 DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (T,Th) COMPLETE 11 COMMENTS TUES /TJ URS ROUTING: PLEASE ROUTE fl NO FURTHER REVIEW REQUIRED ROUTED BY STAFF n (If routed by staff, make copy to master file & enter Sierra.) REVIEWERS INITIAL 1 APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) APPROVED n APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS E NOT APPROVED (attach comments) REVIEWERS INITIAL CORRECTION DETERMINATION: APPROVED n REVIEWERS INITIAL C:ROUTE -F NOT COMPLETE El NOT APPLICABLE El APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS DATE DATE DATE C DUE DATE PLANNING DIVISION 0 PERMIT COORDINATOR Q DUE DATE 9-a3- (Certification or occupancy rcquircd, g-q7 Co rrec +i or) DUE DATE NOT APPROVED (attach comments) 0 to COMPLETE COMMENTS C:ROUTE -F 1 PLAN REVIEW / ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER PROJECT NAME DEPARTMENT: BUILDING DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS REVIEWERS INITIAL REVIEWERS INITIAL REVIEWERS INITIAL L, NOT COMPLETE ❑ CORRECTION DETERMINATION: APPROVED F APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) p nay 9 FIRE PREVENTION • STRUCTURAL DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (T,Th) TUES /THURS ROUTING: PLEASE ROUTE E NO FURTHER REVIEW REQUIRED-1:r ROUTED BY STAFF El (If routed by staff, make copy to master file & enter Sierra,) DATE / q/q7 1 1 APPROVED n APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS . NOT APPROVED (attach comments) q DATE DATE PLANNING DIVISION (Certification of occupancy required. PERMIT COORDINATOR ❑ DUE DATE c fr q NOT APPLICABLE DUE DATE ci d 3. C/7 DUE DATE NOT APPROVED (attach comments) ❑ : i..: .$ ,r; ?:Fr�CL�A��i nff 11 ' i . YSa`a)a.' '.' 4oio::p`i n' ; ;1'?'$:s{F '.: ek ,1t. DEPARTMENT: BUILDING DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS COMPLETE n COMMENTS ' REVIEWERS INITIAL REVIEWERS INITIAL C:ROUTE -F L STRUCTURAL DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (T,Th) NOT COMPLETE C TUES /THURS ROUTING: PLEASE ROUTE C CORRECTION DETERMINATION: APPROVED n APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS DATE APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) APPROVED APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS ❑ DATE PLAN REVIEW / ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER I v l m' �. 5() DATE 997 F 3eLk C:�rr Ouxck ho u e ; FI RE PREVENTION E r 4 ROUTED BY STAFF ❑ (If routed by staff, make copy to master file & enter Sierra.) REVIEWERS INITIAL DATE PLANNING DIVISION PERMIT COORDINATOR I DUEDATE NOT APPLICABLE ❑ NO FURTHER REVIEW REQUIRED ❑ 1 DUE DATE l D93- 97 NOT APPROVED (attach comments) 0 DUE DATE NOT APPROVED (attach comments) ❑❑ (Certification of occupancy required. katg'i7giqiAi:riggf,;'4t PLAN REVIEW / ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER V DATE 91'97 PROJECT NAME 0(WOCA 54eak DEPARTMENT: BUILDING DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS 4 TUES/THURS ROUTING: PLEASE ROUTE 0 NO FURTHER REVIEW REQUIRED Cl ROUTED BY STAFF ri (If routed by staff, make copy to master file & enter Sierra.) • DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (T,Th) COMPLETE ri NOT COMPLETE COMMENTS REVIEWERS INITIAL APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) APPROVED n APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS REVIEWERS INITIAL Ati CP CORRECTION DETERMINATION: APPROVED LJ APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS REVIEWERS INITIAL C:ROUTE-F FIRE PREVENTION E PLANNING DIVISION sTRucruRAL P1 PERMIT COORDINATOR 1:1 DATE DUE DATE ci -a3- 97 NOT APPROVED (attach comments) t z e cei ,Jea \ DATE 7 on cI DATE DUE DATE NOT APPLICABLE El DUE DATE NOT APPROVED (attach comments) El (Certification of occupancy required. 16:3 e ' !C tiV... ',19 ':iF.`krAt'dttr,o Arcs. .4:Kit: rcer+;'VmktoTrr!!a"Alxzavp,4 ....rar 1 BUILDING DIVISION El COMPLETE REVIEWERS INITIAL c APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) APPROVED APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS Mt: <rH•t FIRE PREVENTION E DATE arore,41 ar:r, REVIEWERS INITIAL DATE Cot PLAN REVIEW / ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER lb O WO DATE 49 A•Mt. PROJECT NAME OU SW:W*0S • eeasrevo DEPARTMENT: PLANNING DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS L STRUCTURAL . PERMIT COORDINATOR DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (T, Th) DUE DATE // f /P NOT COMPLETE Sj e NOT APPLICABLE 0 COMMENTS ' R ed )1 � in vm' l) t Q e - 1 { r I lr) C (ec i-tY: �d h\ 1 P.W. 1 - ye t �` 1 id I TUES /THURS ROUTING: PLEASE ROUTE E NO FURTHER REVIEW REQUIRED E ROUTED BY STAFF ri (If routed by staff, make copy to master file & enter Sierra.) DATE 1 1 DUE DATE r2 APPROVED APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS E NOT APPROVED (attach comments) REVIEWERS INITIAL CORRECTION DETERMINATION: DUE DATE NOT APPROVED (attach comments) 0 (Certification of occupancy required. ) IT r 113.1 v.> bW.5.4 <il'.'.R'ml<p+ ILA' 1�5::0't.i.a:tfaw.l.e+v.w•w.n.v PUBLIC WORKS COMPLETE n COMMENTS C:ROUTE -F REVIEWERS INITIAL REVIEWERS INITIAL REVIEWERS INITIAL L� PLAN REVIEW / ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER a lY " CO WO DATE _ _ _ PROJECT NAME OUTBACK 5 € 1Kbe &Mi fig DEPARTMENT: BUILDING DIVISION 421. FIRE PREVENTION C PLANNING DIVISION STRUCTURAL DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (T,Th) DUE DATE 8 + / /f /P TUES /THZJRS ROUTING: PLEASE ROUTE 0 NO FURTHER REVIEW REQUIRED E ROUTED BY STAFF El (If routed by staff, make copy to master file Sc enter Sierra.) APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) APPROVED I I APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS CORRECTION DETERMINATION: NOT COMPLETE NOT APPLICABLE EI DATE DATE DATE C �eav,N•.R1rtMNncYKnnyM!�v wLnMMMn�Vw -rM'�+e�r.�e.�s;w4+�.*Y• .r.imu.K�Y�.- ..�..w.M./�S1C.. TAKC� °• -� . .PERMIT COORDINATOR Q DUE DATE 7 ( NOT APPROVED (attach comments) DUE DATE APPROVED 1 APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS E NOT APPROVED (attach comments) E (C:rtifiadoa of occupancy rcquircd. tr iletA.E '..'lek1 .4.!1'ti.7:10.:a $ ACTIVITY NUMBER Dente' 0 (90 DATE 8 4/4 1` PROJECT NAME OVISACIC 9€b3 E • eetZSP:14 DEPARTMENT: BUILDING DIVISION L_1 FIRE PREVENTION PLANNING DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS STRUCTURAL E DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (T,Th) DUE DATE COMPLETE n NOT COMPLETE COMMENTS • PLAN REVT,W / ROUTING SLIP TUES /THURS ROUTING: PLEASE ROUTE NO FURTHER REVIEW REQUIRE ROUTED BY STAFF n (If routed by staff, make copy to master file & enter Sierra.) REVIEWERS INITIAL) 5 (6 REVIEWERS INITIAL CORRECTION DETERMINATION: APPROVED REVIE'W'ERS INITIAL C:ROUTE -F • ■••■••.. aw a•• vw nristIiin4nr.Yei.+..nn•wr.r•..v ••.•+••9 `Y' APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS DAB 8 (c`?IT) c )/1 , +1' L APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) APPROVED n APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS C NOT APPROVED (attach comments) EI DATE DATE PERMIT COORDINATOR 0 NOT APPLICABLE DUE DATE rz Iq DUE DATE NOT APPROVED (attach comments) fl (Carne rion of occupancy rcquir d. ) 1 PLAN REVIEW / ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER b 1 O DATE _ _ _ PROJECT NAME OUt 9(046104e • eex1wcvJ 1 DEPARTMENT: BUILDING DIVISION E FIRE PREVENTION STRUCTURAL PUBLIC WORKS DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (T,Th) COMPLETE NOT COMPLETE COMMENTS TUES /THURS ROUTING: PLEASE ROUTE ROUTED BY STAFF REVIEWERS INITIAL DATE e ! / ° r / 77 t i APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) C:ROUTE -F APPROVED REVIEWERS INITIAL L4 APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS C CORRECTION DETERMINATION: APPROVED 1 APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS REVIEWERS INITIAL (If routed by staff, make copy to master file & enter Sierra.) DATE DATE C XO PLANNING DIVISION PERMIT COORDINATOR 0 DUE DATE eligis? NOT APPLICABLE NO FURTHER REVIEW REQUIRED DUE DATE /An NOT APPROVED (attach comments) DUE DATE NOT APPROVED (attach comments) (Certification of occupancy rcquircd. l PLAN REVIEW / ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER VP" 0190 DATE 8 k/fa' PROJECT NAME OUD K e ee tarStaft) DEPARTMENT: BUILDING DIVISION Li FIRE PREVENTION PUBLIC WORKS STRUCTURAL DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (T,Th) REVIEWERS INTTIAL APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) APPROVED APPROVED C:ROUTE-F REVIEWERS INITIAL APPROVED WI CONDITIONS CORRECTION DETERMINATION: REVIEWERS INITIAL APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS DATE DATE DATE C PLANNING DIVISION DUE DATE % if? PERMIT COORDINATOR E 1 =DATE el /9 /P 4 ,t,. 442 g .zwdc ! �-. sett 4-0, TUESPrEWKS PLEASE ROUTE fl NO FURTHER REVIEW REQUIRED C ROUTED BY STAFF n (If routed by staff, make copy to master file & enter Sierra.) NOT APPROVED (attach comments) Q DUE DATE NOT APPROVED (attach comments) L (C:rdficacoa of occupancy required. ) COMPLETE n NOT COMPLETE gi • NOT APPLICABLE COMMENTS i 5 17 ÷,2/ Pit 1v odd . Pw , hJ /11? %'L l,, K . '. k�..:' A.e;di:,. amt` 4Yt: Y'= iiiiF::?. ?tS' +'AFA:fy "r.C?Y:a..; ;a�: aCercxnr�wk.:.uNwrox,7; t•1 PROJECT NAME 1g A,INT: II.D i)n , PUBLIC WO RKS REVIEWERS INrPIIAL APPROVED REVIEWERS INITIAL C:ROUTE -F Vali* C r4tnokoy toe PLAN REVIEW / ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER D97 -0180 CORRECTION DETERMINATION: OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE FIRE PREVENTION ktuC. (Dior) STRUCTURAL ct'1 -T 1 I DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (T,Th) w r::.!= bnn .M >r.w'.v�t.wnr':.:'RJtLS.r,. l�'�"uf W! YYf :N "FA +CSW!"rhY4tiF= '*]'.5�w,.,< ' t> r". 4f 5Y SVfM1':".1yt:D'fd.•t�:K "'tLi.: /XF' ;Y�T.ASCS!VStfi••JY •S:S DATE DATE DATE 6/09/97 � G D SION ag=gr DUE DATE 6/10/97 J COMPLETE NOT COMPLETE NOT NOT APPLICABLE Ei COMMENTS -e r of C o nptete_. ( T 1 l c k-f in n inO1/41 w ) TUES /THURS ROUTING: PLEASE ROUTE l l NO FURTHER REVIEW REQUIRED El ROUTED BY STAFF [1 (If routed by stag, make copy to master file & enter Sierra.) APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) DUE DATE 6/24/97 31 cis ) APPROVED 0 APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS n NOT APPROVED (attach comments) lau p% Coce&or\ LkC( 1 may k - REVIEWERS INITIAL DATE 9 , t 1 DUE DATE APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS 4-- NOT APPROVED (attach comments) 0 (Cerdficadon of occupancy required. ) , ACTIVITY NUMBER D97 -0180 PROJECT NAME OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE DEPARTMENT: BUILDING DIVISION • L PUBLIC WORKS L, J DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (T,Th) COMPLETE COMMENTS PLAN REVIEW / ROUTING SLIP TUES /TIIURS ROUTING: PLEASE ROUTE FIRE PREVENTION E PLANNING DIVISION E , STRUCTURAL El PERMIT COORDINATOR NOT COMPLETE ROUTED BY STAFF n (If routed by staff, make copy to master file & enter Sierra.) REVIEWERS INITIAL APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) APPROVED I I APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS C NOT APPROVED (attach comments) REVIEWERS INITIAL APPROVED REVIEWERS INITIAL C:ROUTE -F CORRECTION DETERMINATION: APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS DATE DUE DATE NO FURTHER REVIEW,REQUIRED DATE & " lO^ NOT APPLICABLE n DUE DATE DATE ZE'" 9 1 DATE 6/09/97 6/10/97 6/24/97 DUE DATE NOT APPROVED (attach comments) Q (Certification of occupancy required. ) • r.Arr,S" !ri ?l.' • ■.t ±p i s r. :/ "s K A vgAt ^it-mitk'r invotP3 '1. C, , ACTIVITY NUMBER D97 -0180 /5/D S •G . / 1/ 1 DEPARTMENT: ?to6a. Met" Mdr. BUILDING DIVISION ❑ FIRE PREVENTION a PROJECT NAME PUBLIC WORKS 1 4 DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (T,Th) COMPLETE E COMMENTS REVIEWERS INITIAL PLAN REVIEW / ROUTING SLIP L OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE NOT COMPLETE TUES /TE URS ROUTING: PLEASE ROUTE NO FURTHER REVIEW REQUIRED ROUTED BY STAFF ❑ (If routed by staff, make copy to master file & enter Sierra.) APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) APPROVED I I APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS REVIEWERS INITIAL CORRECTION DETERNIINATION: APPROVED REVIEWERS INITIAL C:ROUTE -F .74-1/1, r1 APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS N 11'x _ fih"5 . t.m. :ro,v4r.anCi rh`,F' yt': r, 74: S;Ya+ DATE DATE DATE DUE DATE DATE 6/09/97 PLANNING DIVISION Q STRUCTURAL ❑ PERMIT COORDINATOR ❑ DUE DATE 6/10/97 NOT APPLICABLE fl 6/24/97 NOT APPROVED (attach comments) fl 1 DUE DATE NOT APPROVED (attach comments) ❑ (Certification of occupancy required. ) 4 ACTIVITY NUMBER PROJECT NAME DEPARTMENT: BUILDING DMSION T PUBLIC WORKS REVIEWERS INITIAL APPROVED n REVIEWERS INITIAL APPROVED C:ROUTE -F T iphl'i . +Mn7''iak,'` i X.:. ! isv. } ' ei#3 .01411FfTS'.'� T, T'v'etWE'7 PLAN REVIEW / ROUTING SLIP L R� D97 -0180 CORRECTION DETERMINATION: OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE FIRE PREVENTION fl STRUCTURAL 4 DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (T,Th) COMPLETE NOT COMPLETE COMMENTS APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS C PLANNING DIVISION ■ PERMIT COORDINATOR DUE DATE NOT APPLICABLE DATE lJ "' ld -CI - 7 • DUE DATE DATE — - REVIEWERS INITIAL DATE DATE 6/09/97 6/10/97 TUES /THURS ROUTING: PLEASE ROUTE Jj NO FURTHER REVIEW REQUIRED El ROUTED BY STAFF El (If routed by staff, make copy to master file & enter Sierra.) 6/24/97 APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS C NOT APPROVED (attach comments) r DUE DATE NOT APPROVED (attach comments) E (Ceniftcadoa of occupancy rcquircd. ) : gahri?i y, Y;I?o.: wa REVIEWERS INITIAL PLAN REVIEW / ROUTING SLIP , ACTIVITY NUMBER D97 -0180 DATE 6/09/97 PROJECT NAME OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE DEPARTMENT: BUILDING DIVISION — 1 FIRE PREVENTION ► 1 PLANNING DIVISION PUBLIC WORKS III STRUCTURAL E PERMIT COORDINATOR Q DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (T,Th) COMPLETE E- NOT COMPLETE E COMMENTS TUES /THURS ROUTING: PLEASE ROUTE NO FURTHER REVIEW REQUIRED E ROUTED BY STAFF n (If rout ' • staff, make copy to master file & enter Sierra.) DATE ( ` APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: (ten days) APPROVED APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS E REVIEWERS INITIAL CORRECTION DETERMINATION: APPROVED C:ROUTE -F APPROVED W/ CONDITIONS P kd to tE}v,.rt' DATE REVIEWERS INITIAL DATE DUE DATE 6/10/97 NOT APPLICABLE El DUE DATE 6/24/97 NOT APPROVED (attach comments) 7/1 DUE DATE NOT APPROVED (attach comments) 0 (Certification of occupancy required. ) •$: TO: FROM: DATE: Attachment a/s JJS /jh City of Tukwila Department of Public Works Kelcie Peterson, Permit Coordinator Joanna Spencer, Public Works Department November 17, 1997 SUBJECT: Outback Steakhouse 46535 Southcenter Parkway Pro' - ► • PRE97 -048 Storm 1 ramage . amtary Sewer Revisions Revision for rerouting of existing drainage line around the new building was received by Public Works on October 29, 1997. Revision for Sanitary Sewer connection with alignment adjusted to avoid conflicts with existing utilities was received by Public Works on November 14, 1997. Both revisions were approved by Public Works on November 17, 1997. Applicant shall incorporate the above revisions in the future "as- built" plans. CF: Applicant (w /copy of plan) Development File (w /copy of plan) City Utilities Inspector (w /copy on plan) John W. Rants, Mayor Ross A. Earnst, P. E., Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 433-0179 • Fax (206) 4313665 35 30 25 ZO 15 — wt . x a Aai 1a ; ii ' 0 +00 STD DTL *53-10 111ti 90 K•ID 1. 2• 0 14 rri4 DJGTILE- iv-au ° -- o&T slot DRrp Ing- - X • J V ✓ t° o o r w t to t`� X 00 0 O o I y J ia ya • = itt 3 F- 3t N 1: 0 m 4, 4 } gy t- ti a / 8i'. rim. /77 es loe47 AY fri•D $& B=ri.D5 • ltISTI►.11.�: _ USING o?I;><r.1 CAT ikcalss sountcra rt4 'PAItic -14 !Flip z3a5 L ttea morE . Mc- z. Gm/ 511$ DTLIt' SS-4 Pdwl z29,00 • IM /(i, " w) InJ (S ot4 =?45oz I - t o a MA COT To UTIL ' TEt'i¢trJUi (Z'To.3' @1>0Tron d i T• 46'e SAworr) BOTH S'a5 OF Tr--(s To Bi sew "art - AT SAHIB Tn•te Te MI JIMJZC PdtzAircia QF 6 aasd26S. 3. Mo.11 sa+ac cm- PEA 4R4 DeoD.u6 To caow op p+ PE 4. AACIcPu.4.- TZ•c -^3 WITH GDF f rodiAdisl MIX • 4rA • o¢. 12o TS; Eau•L 5. Lo tt-N -SEAL *4•41 HOLe AT 130 T14 P•514 bT+L4T4OS of OaTSIDE baO1l . CEU1 t . orJE zo' LE+ui1l� • q t.P, ovb2. K a ca0 $i.. GI. Z. ALL Wro.1t tiff PAcw,l/wt T.- GFJ4s - I.Frac.. ItS ooA.wt. Coots I)I/J /1TI< STMZT 1 g.• 1 Glty pap . These plans have been reviewed by the Public Works Dep- 'tment for conform ^nco with current City st : Acceptant and c ado c: c: for - y oft;:; the. the acct revised Final : . ;.object to field inspection by the uiilities inspector. Date; Nov (7r m'7 By: U L' cuEna ar elm = 3z9o Inn/1,-24,11 1 - CIEF - Ase. J atTGec�t?rc- st._1/�� cuY 5Tc wit_ 4 —IZ. (SIZE ,c,JD Ex,44. LoC.AZ10 To 3E 0 ESIti&161:1 fast o rk,6S. (Baca MEOlh+JlcAt. rt41JS, SkeeT M 3.) z-1-00 NOV - -1.4 1997 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS errors - of th :o .s 3f 1 3UX - aEArJou r WV = ZSAvo Tdk 1 11 OUTOAx.K,, Rc STAr takt� 54K. SEweR- RIcVIS1oti) To sOLvE con)p_te,T Wt114 EXISTING- lz'I PG-r¢o LIJ6 24 STOlzni UAJE RECEIVED . tGl‹.. Fe. u► l ql 35 30 - 25 . -20 15 , r t r r . r . . . . r . . . • �•J�h•L -:Cy ri a77, ,fti C s`r59-4104 71/kw.44 i%r199- 1 -o .v. • LOT 2 OF BINDING S DDCV ASS IN VAULT. DOMESTIC GREASE U TRASH EN Ito yC UN-rt Q swoon% 6' SS SIDE 12' ST 6' DOWN :1 TIGHT UNE .51,x✓ r I114x Q sit 0.'!L' '•7 24•* STEEL RECEIVED < ^,w_ OCT 2 9 TUKWILA 1997 ��c "C �'. .. . t,.. v �.. -.v ., .. <•Y v. ... fit,, r'r ,erv. .tt.'.1:`.. i..a ��5. :, }...., i't:f> Ml: t^.V rt!•.ir,N,'C14Ti ". !"N iT 1y.Srl'...� evfh�}ly'ii 41110 - J7Oi!'1/A r Qz /44 -7/o vs '#t/ .SaRt'e T DP: '.ew/ o ' &A* # 92002 - �d 46a f /■ZJ er;o .. • E T Ae7golar • /o-z9 -f7 r;/s 7 /A/4 024-/A/4-60 . %t/E • ogr.v,c• 431.1)¢. SEWER PIPES Enter up to 10 pipes. Enter <Roturn> only for flowrate and FLOWRATE DIAMETER FRICTION (CFS) (IN) (FT --0■1 .3 S -10-1.16 A2.16 t 306 L' pQoposc'v. 12:00 12.00. 12.00 E>(tisritl'1 5roeen LINE •. bf�C To Kx cr3 " A ( Tetaa Devsr 440 DA 4 -4 s LM ES 4•5 * Am. 73.os /.J✓ S / i y 4 - . q /e/ =' 3.1 V 0.0240 0.0120 0.0120 /7 Grti ln= O.o2y) Ghp.5 (FL#4 Mt) - faL.r. • •1, en : 0, /12 ) GA,00ur7 (, vG- .- &he. ¢ate 4101 eit l Per Saeuerz Frei diameter to SLOPE (z) 0.49 Q.09 0.32 end. VELOCITY (FPS) 1.72 C' 1.47 ■ 2.78 ,'.. /dON s dv.35/ ..00‘./.AA/ SLoPg _ 71412D.3.!4 - O. v 9% spit. sa.¢eo/Af1eGe ' = /035efs 1 SdR✓Eyea „Kr +1p, r 2/• / 9' .LS)./et/Fy& /E J,. G¢ 4gmn4.4LE SLOP m a /•i • '✓Vo .1 4/14446 _ /. /e. t fs .�o '.uTieg.- ; . Gamyl�ca ego sr refer rrco CB ro C E,A A•1 Gill j iff T a 7A.. •(M . .4'• ?he. AV-47 1D %" E /3t -+Ara 4- f/ /•c S 6•a 467 A✓ C.cs 4 A,u G G A-44.. 'A/ vale',s /s 6 7'J-- 6-6A/ Ga M / "pi- 9 a, 4o " - ea ,OeG A"A" 1 pRe101a 4- • $2,0 /✓ - /2 (n :.0, /-0 ruays.10,0 .Arm. /E Ad a aO1.t-Q F94.01 /L1 4- Q .tro SaRG/RegE•) _. .?. /S c M a. 3020 ":71.13 . .w eLs%� " 'm' 116.90 /N . .Um. 1 ° ,..^0.'10 /N ✓ar�rc�w v 19.94• GQ ''�� s 6,i• /o /=sly) • / /✓ �OO� N6•C/i v1- /4/Y .L7 •4•�7 - /E :t/9.10 _ . /2 / /1'f r 4.3248 • •/ ./9 -2o,so - 0 6 32.% • q•. gavisst , !.8 Ca 11ot. r. l ALL LO'LAT Rarnj 1 Teat. DQilyIi.J l.. Past* 14 1.1 90•?0 /At ' ' 20,77 ' -.r /AA o, c,.ati6 -s /44 ...r.✓.9.1 BL• ..J .eOiYt 60 exit RECEIVED OCT 2 9 1997 PUBLIC WORKS CORES .DA1 NO. 1 • i / 2 )( 4 (/4' ilirro/z... .crfr- ,(40Aegrag 4 ,76 — • 9//' la i)eciva-id i294- ,f)67_,0 .A 1)24/ fil~ .'itfe.4.Afgpa24.__ami_dx-L1- . . . RECwD _ ef21+ - TUOVILA 0,11. /000- r 4 Pm vApez. , ATTDITION 4 04 119 Ai-AA/440A ra ^mem prari-ene j ry4xf • PACII=10 ENOINEERINO 'WESSON INC. NE CIVIL ENDINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS 130 ANDOVER PARK EAST. SUITE 300 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98188 • TO (208) 431-7970 FAX: 431-7975 "ease/ p We Are Sending You: ri Blue Prints 0 Copies 0 Other O Mvlars/Vallums 0 Disks 0 Engineering Xerox Printing: 0 IN HOUSE 0 REPROGRAPHICS ' 4 Prtax ,a_____ Sheets Including L 0 Courier Hour Delivery El Other These Are Transmitted As Checked Below: 0 As requested 0 Approved as submitted ,*'For approval 0 For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Returned for correction COPY TO: ELL o a AI Arr. 57.5"-.9571 ■.., Letim 44-4G- ip pre./ "..Aitke, ree- c - F VpAGIIMOVITAL • r of Transmittal O For rev' w and comment o SIGNED: not o nots4 6136 _ 566111663075 6160 If ancieurso ors os May not* 01 us ones FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 6130 ----- 1 :1: 5135 ____{ 0 Mail 1• 4j74L - 70 --t- /s .0 j jr/fAer- ,U66 411,44/6-s* ft4f ,e6a,o)v Ait'r red-ir- eaAr : ' ; • 1211 Market Street, Kirkland, WA 98033 425-827-0197 Fax 828 -3019 Engineering Memorandum Datc November 5, 1997 To Tobb Construction Attn.: Kelly Project: Outback Steakhouse - Southcenter Parkway Subject: Detail C/S3 clarification No 2 x 4 blocking at 48" o.c. is required the "framer's option" detail is used as shown on C /S3, 423 828 3 619 P: 01 (%/Ga RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA NOV 0 5 1997 Charles Voelker, PE PERMIT CENTER k 09/18/97 TUE 15:14 FAX 208 575 4743 DAVID W. WIDE GENERAL MANAGER Septernber 16, 1997 Ms. Joanna Spencer City of Tukwila Public Works 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Ms. Spencer: This is to confirm with you that we have had conversations with the tenant, Evergreen State Restaurant Corporation d.b.a. Outback Steakhouse, and understand that the southwest driveway will be closed for a short duration (approximate)y one week), while the construction is ongoing to connect to the appropriate utilities at the street. If there are any further questions please contact me directly. With Best Regards, David W. Wilde General Manager DWW:ch cc: Craig Edwards, Outback Steakhouse Barry Cunningham, Director of Engineering DOUBLETREE ROTEL Via Facsimile: 431-3665 Qui DOUBLETREE SUITES SEATTLE 16500 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188 206 575-8220 FAX 206 575-4743 TO: Permit Center FROM: Public Works Engineering DATE: September 16, 1997 SUBJECT: Outback Steakhouse 16535 Southcenter Parkway Project No.: PRE97 -048 Permit No.: D97 -0180 Contact Person: Jim Holtz Phone: (425) 747 -3177 JJS /sal NOTIFICATION OF UTILIT PERMIT • CTION THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS HAVE BEEN APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS APPROVED ON SEPTEMBER 16,1997: PERMIT FEE Fire Loop /Hydrant $25.00 Sanitary Side Sewer $20.00 Storm Drainage $25.00 Landscape Irrigation $25.00 Land Altering $66.00 1 1/2" Domestic Water Meter $625.00 (7 1 1/2" Exempt Water Meter (Irrigation - Water Only) $625.00 V TOTAL: $1411.00 Ross A. Earnst, P. E., Director Two copies of the confirmed Utility Permit Application and plans are attached for inclusion in the permit file. CF: Development File (with copy of application and plans) PW Utilities Inspector (with copy of application and plans) Finance Department (with a copy of application) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 433-0179 • Fax (206) 431 SEP 11 '97 20:08 BROWN &f OCIATES Ms. Joanna J. Spencer Department of Public Works City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 • Yours truly, C. V. Brown, P.E. cvb /s encl. cc Mr. Rick Lentz, A.Z.A. Merrick Lentz Architects Traffic Engineers QS Transportation Planners D1io 180 Christopher brown a Associates 879 Qainier Avenue N.. Suite A -201 Denton. WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 Fax 772 -4321 September 11, 1997 Re: Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila • Traffic Mitigation Fees Table V - Proportionate Share Contributions Left Turn Queuing Analysis with S. Driveway Closed P.1 • CHRISTOPHER BROWN P.E. FAX 200. 7724821 P E 206-772.1188 T 1 po PAGES # ` DATE! 9' / /14 L, Dear Ms. Spencer: At the request of Mr. Rick Lentz of the Merrick Lentz Architects I am enclosing a copy of my recent letter, with attachments, to address the issues you have noted in your memorandum dated September 3rd. Concerning the back -to -back center 2 -way left turns at the north site driveway and at McDonald's, when the south driveway is closed, there is no reason to presume any problem will arise. The estimated queues are far too small to suggest any respective access driveway impacts during this brief construction imposed condition. I trust this satisfactorily covers the two issues you have raised in your last memorandum. RECEIVED SEP 1 1 1997 PUBLIC WIORKS ::�'�s�.k�'✓';iic .a�:= li�hik na SEP 11 '97 20:09 BROWN &AC CIATES Mr. Rick Lentz, A.Z.A. Merrick Lentz Architects 1800 - 136th Place N.E. Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 n�' a.. a».•. +.. «.MV.aw.,..._........ ». «a»..r .«a..w iu.«.nam..tY'.m;s nrtaAnxYl� : .w6rvTffn n....naw.rwiuuwaM1nwa. cvnwM��M «!/r. +vYfe.l*arW!y!]nH.v, Christopher Brown Aeaociates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772 -1188 Fax 772 -4321 September 11, 1997 Re: Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Traffic Mitigation Fees Table V - Proportionate Share Contributions Left Turn Queuing Analysis with S. Driveway Closed Dear Mr. Lentz: Thank you for your faxed memorandum from Ms. Joanna Spencer of the City of 'Tukwila, DPW, regarding the proportionate share contributions by the developer as noted under our Table V of page 13 of the traffic study. Please note that in preparing this table we understood that the mitigation fees are related to the actual improvement project. Thus, for the Southcenter /Strander•project, where the westbound left turns are to be enhanced, we took the site's projected 4 . westbound left turns as the requisite volume. We did not take the entire volume of traffic (24 trips) as the parameter. If you use the full 24 trips as noted in the modified Table V per Ms. Spencer's last memorandum, then the table would show: $140 X 24 - $3,360 for the fair share cost. Similarly, at Southcenter /Minkler we again assumed our fair share would reflect the work anticipated and again on the improved leg we are adding.3 trips. As before, if the full 24 trips negotiating all legs of the intersection is the parameter, then, again this will modify the study's Table V per Ms. Spencer's last memorandum and show a fee of: $137 X 24 = $3,288 for the fair share cost. As you can see, the traffic mitigation fee depends on what one considers the proportion to be. Is it based on all trips Traffic Engineers af Transportation Planners P.2 Vast l4t:F?LbA'm xM.?R1'.SYfii /XiGl +'.".tiS�ISit` i.�t'1'S „'ISiY;-: �v +N: '07.4 d,M.. SEP 11 '97 20 :09 BROWN& Mr. Rick Lentz, A.I.A. September 11, 1997 page 2 )CIATES through the entire intersection, on all legs, or is it related to only those trips on the legs that are to be improved? Naturally, we have taken a conservative view; the city has taken the liberal view. Last, we did not include the Southcenter /S. 168th Street signal in our table since that project is a primary benefit to the side (minor) .street traffic. While we acknowledge adding traffic to the through north -south stream, the signal is only justified on the basis of enhancing access for those vehicles associated with the S. 168th Street linkage and, as such, we felt that they would be the primary if not only contributors. In a similar vein as before the full 24 north -south trips negotiating this intersection would add a new line to Table,_,y with its mitigation fee being: $166 X 24 - $3,984 for the fair share cost. In total, taking the liberal view rather than the conservative approach, Table V would be revised to read: TABLE V Cost /Trip Number Fair Share of Trips Project S.Center /Strander Widen for W8 LT S.Center /Minkler S.Cent'er /168th Signal $140 $137 $166 24 24 24 City Requested developer Contribution $ 3,360 $ 3,288 3.984 $10,632 In order to ensure a timely completion I would suggest that: A. The above table be presented to the city for approval. B. You ask for an interpretation as to the correct way to define project impact. Is it the entire intersection, . per se, or is it limited to only the actual intersection legs that are being impacted by site traffic? P.3 SEP 11 '97 20:10 BROWN&At ZIATES Mr. Rick Lentz, A.I.A. September 11, 1997 • page 3 lnn ySWHr�c,R4'. M'HH.b+. The next and last item of the memorandum is to address the queuing associated with the five days of driveway closure, from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. In this regard you may recall we provided you with capacity computations for the north driveway both with and without the project with our last memorandum. Pages 1 and 2 of those computations (attached) deal with the north driveway under current (1997) conditions. As you will see on the attached copies the southbound left turn into the north driveway, under current p.m. peak hour loading, is 27 vph. The queue is only 0.3 vehicles as shown by the "cloud" I have drawn on page 2 of the computations. This is an empty queue. Continuing, I did not calculate the LOS and queue lengths for the McDonald's driveway. It is indeed an off set intersection as Ms. Spencer has observed. The reason Z did not continue with its LOS calculation for the north driveway to McDonald's is because that volume is even smaller (20 vph versus the above noted 27 vph) and, even better, the northbound left turn traffic into McDonald's crosses 1,044 vph in the SB lanes in contrast to the southbound left turn that must cross 1216 vph in the northbound lanes. P.4 In essence, if the SB queue with a higher opposing volume has a length of 0.3 vehicles then the NB queue into Mcdonald's, with an even smaller opposing volume, must be smaller, too. I apologize if this has proven to be unfathomable to the reviewer but, mathematically, I would suggest it is truly the "trivial case" and does not really deserve any further attention. Nonetheless, since the likelihood of a "Mexican Stand -off" always a possibility with these off -set driveways the attached • calculations may provide additional answers. First, I am enclosing a copy of Figure B with its gross volumes • followed by the LOS calculations as originally submitted with Luis. last memorandum. Thie its to saho. than the SB left turn queue is only 0.3 vehicles in length as discussed above. Second, I am attaching a sketch of the revised volumes with the south driveway closed. This sketch indicates the "off -set" intersections (or more correctly, driveways). I have also added the "file numbers" for the next set of LOS computations. SEP 11 '97 20:10 BROWN& '";,1CIATES Mr. Rick Lentz, A.I.A. September 11, 1997 page 4 As shown on the attached sketch file OTBK- D1.HCO is for the "north driveway" with the south driveway closed. Note that the SB left turn queue is now 1 (one) car long. Clearly, this too is minimal. Th4 a Analvsis ..is followed ,by file OTBK -D2 . HCO which is for the , "McDonald's driveway ". Again s wi lz at/yummy t:v the site being closed. Note that the NH left turn queue is 0.1 car in length or, to all intents and purposes, it is an empty queue. This is likewise trivial. Accordingly, on the strength of the highest peak hour of the day the back -to -back queues between McDonald's and the north driveway appear to be insignificant. Again, as noted above, I'd . call this a trivial matter or, perhaps better stated, an insignificant problem. For the•driveway issues raised in Ms. Spencer's last memo, yes, there may be times when some queuing forms and the potential will exist for a "Mexican Stand -off ", so to speak, but the data does not suggest it is an onerous problem or one that needs to be of any concern since it is not predictable. I hope the foregoing explanation and subsequent LOS /queuing analyses will address the issues raised by Ms. Spencer. The issues are certainly valid and I appreciate the Tukwila DPw having them brought to my attention. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance and do keep me posted on how the city answers the matter of fair share mitigation - be it conservative or liberal in a final assessment. Yours truly, C. V. Brown, P.E. cvb /e encl. cc Ms. Joanna J. Spencer SEP 11 '97 20 :11,BROWN&A CIATES North Driveway Note: For site p.m. peak hour volumes and trip assignment see Figure 5, page 8, TIP. dated 7/20/97. FIGURE 'B' Driveway Volumes With Project Christopher brown ar Associates 879 Rsiaicr Avenue N.. Suite A -201 [lentos. WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772.1188 aria No. Lanes Stop /Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's ( %) SU /RV's ( %) CV's (%) PCE's Northbound L T R 0 2 1 N 1207 14 .95 58 1 Southbound T R - -- - - -- - - -- 1 27 1029 .75 .87 -1 0 0, 1 0.96 2 0 N Adjustment Factors SEP 11 '97 20:11 BROWN& XCIATES { P.7 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c ` TBK- P1.HC0 Page 1 mummermasnmeasa.ssassassasss Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611 -2083 Ph: (904) 392 -0378 UUUUUU am= ======= ====== 24====i3=111=2 ===== On= ===== AM= ===== ===1111SOMUMWO Streets: (N -S) Southcenter Pkwy (E -W) North Driveway Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst C. v. Brown Date of Analysis 8/21/97 Other information Current (1997) P.M. Peak Hour Volumes w /o Project Two -way Stop- controlled Intersection p 3 r a m r 0 O r r a=== 0 s a m e === Eastbound L T R 0 0 0 Westbound L T R 1 0. 1 13 55 .65 :73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 0001 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c OT'BK- PI.HCO Page 2 aaaa==s a== = = = =saaaaaawraeaa:aaaae == = =a3 == =sea == =ss== = = =aaaa== =ma=st= =sa Step 1: RT from Minor Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: Step 2: LT from Major Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: Step 4: LT from Minor Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: •Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) Avg. Flow Move Shared Total Rate Cap Cap Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec /veh) 20 24 497.5 WB L WB R SEP 11 '97 20 11 BROWN8ACCIATES Worksheet for TWSC Intersection 75 659 6.2 34 346 11.5 Intersection Delay = WB EB 636 659 659 0.89 1295 346 346 0.90 SB NB WB EB 2490 27 0.90 0.90 0.90 24 Intersection Performance Summary 95% Queue Length (veh) 3.7 F B C 3.0 sec /veh 0.4 Approach LOS Delay (sec /veh) 100.1 0.3 P.8 0 00: • • 1 • • •••••■•••••■•••••••=46•/1 ••■••■■■••■■•■••••■ • ••••••••■•••••••■••••••■•wo.f....orma.... • • ••••••••••.... • • 1 I I •■■•■See V • YU I . • ••• .. . .... • ....• SEP 11 '97 20:12 BROWN&CCIATES ! " ' OW r■) 1/41;TiOtitisra . ^ 45insm.10fo.pr.44.4ii •••••••,••••••• ow. • ••••••••••••■•••••■•••• ....am. 44 wol • !.. ,/40'1 • .t,/ , A/ . '5 ?iert.t4i#-#17, •....•••••• Ale•=9 4 4'e" ce,/‘!0^74 ** A - ' 04/4 P.9 Cluistophie Boma & Associates 879 Wake Avenue N., Sulte A-201 Renton, WA 9805.3.1380 _ • •,.. • SEP 11 '97 2012 BROWN&PCCIATES P.10 HCS:, Untignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Page 1 Amoinumm=====mummma======asms=====sts=mwamm=msw=on= ===s1====la Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 = 55....5=====.5.5=5 ===== 50========.======.==== MMMMMMMMMM === Streets: (N-S) Southcenter Pkwy (E NuLLIA Etrivewey Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst C. V. Brown Date of Analysis 8/21/97 . Other Information Current (1997) P.M. Peak Hour Volume w/o S. Driveway, E. Leg Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection MM11135352115 ==55 ==5====33111115 No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade • MC's (%) • SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) • PCE's • Vehicle Maneuver Northbound L T R •■ 41M■wm..■ . M■■■ 0 2 1 N 1180 52 .95 .58 1 Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road 555 55= = =555= = = =55=55=5=55 = = ===== ===.. Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R ■■■M Imumwm..■ ■M■■ 1 57 .75 ,0 . 0 1 0.96 2 N 1014 .87 -1 Adjustment Factors Critical Gap (tg) 5.50 5.50 6.50 7.00 ■■■■ ■■■•■ ■■■1 0 0 0 ■■■■ ■■■■ .■■01. 1 0 1 34 91 .65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 Follow-up. Time (tf) 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 'SEP 11 '97 BROWN& VCIATES HCS :.Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c OTBK- D1.HCO Page 2 ssas s: amm======== xsass ss= aeaxa=====e== =asanoass == = ==m=musxenesa =oag =a Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: Step 2: LT from Major Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: Step 4: LT from Minor Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) Avg. Flow Move Shared Total Rate Cap Cap Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec /veh) WB 621 671 671 0.81 1332 330 330 0.78 2484 27 0.78 0.78 0.78 21 Intersection Performance Summary WB L 52 21 * 17.1 F WB R 125 671 6.6 0.8 B L 73 330 14.0 1.0 c Intersection Delay = 43.9 sec /veh * The calculated value was greater than 999.9. EB P.11 Approach LOS Delay (sec /veh) 845.4 0 .7 goi lioporn SEP 11 '97 20:1.3 BROWN& ) CIATES HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611 -2083 Ph: (904) 392 -0378 P.12 Page 1 - - = - - = 2 = =O111Q==7=a-===Qa- -c= = =,aa- a¢ ..aena12a--- __rsc =o == go = = 3 = = a- a - n = =ea - = == =_ =--- == = ==-s== = - No. Lanes Stop /Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's ( %) SU /RV S ( %) CV's ( %) PCE's Vehicle Maneuver Northbound L T R 1,25 Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road Southbound L T R 1 2 1 0 2< 0 0 1 0 N N 20 1251 0 1071 28 0 .95 .95 .58 .87 .95 .95 1 -1 0 Adjustment Factors Critical Gap (tg) 5.50 5.50 6.50 7.00 (E -W) North Driveway Streets: (N -S) Southcenter Pkwy Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst C. V. Brown Date of Analysis 8/21/97 Other Information Current (1997) P_ M Hour Volume NO S. Driveway,( Two -way Stop - controlled Intersection Eastbound L T R 1.10 MI AA MN AA = -= == == = === == = = = = = ==- a= == =-- a = == = - == Westbound L T R 0 0 0 Follow -up Time (tf) 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 • ,% •••;; Step 2: LT from Major Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-Free State: Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-Free State: worksheet for TWSC Intersection 0 32 26 361 112.5 10.7 Intersection Delay = SB NB Step 3: TH from Minor Street WB EB Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 595 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Lengt LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (Pcpb)(sec/veh (veh )f (sec/veh) 0.0 F 0.1 sec/veh 1260 361 361 0.93 2584 34 0.93 32 1.00 0.0 0.2 TO: �� , ^ k ia. DATE: ( 9/Nn TITLE: FROM: c)0o,/' 4.- Jp A4'ct COMPANY: M er ' cic. k,,,, Z fprcittje4i TITLE: U. 1 o3 metn O i . DEPARTMENT: DIVISION: 1 f \J s .•• w.,tisYni3„h aJ::vvnss.•. wilt: v: L: wwv. 0.Miv�n, Kf�bJ::V\.4��Ji:HtvJ.L'LwvNwi. L' -vri .,.. ... ••••••••. ••.... '� wS'n'w.v::aY.:<,Vd..a•M., I . ..• w: a: �" sw�< �:�wv:W�ulfin.M•w:iK<�,:LtG�vi3w : FAX NO. CALLED: . v: ttti:. rt. �ttxc�: ax.: �t.: tt.::...._. e[. sn:.+ coammsr. a:.:abs�t..r�o•.:uv.:,�.xsss st: cis. TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES D, INCLUDING SHEET: s�.wttt..ty ...'. ....w.Nw..u:n:•:N,... SENT BY (INITIALS) •. J35 Kt We% VreNN.... 9v: A .:...\14,33.WeTANviNVAWe.: TRANSMI ITI THIS C OVER s� /. aixz x..ve . .w....v,....,,...m,. .•e.rt -• ,r .•1„ w. e.+ v. �: trtttn�;• uaxv��ru .yY6:^. + "+C[.:Y4Cn�fbCMF.S-= XC'.:Fib CITY OF TUKWILA — PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. FAx TRANSMITTAL c FAX NUMBER: (206) 431 -3665 9 7 _0 I �� SUBJECT: COMMENTS /MESSAGE: - 7 -4 & / /DI'M dr/lAud l js ?a .poptdli,. Ja :cae• -- /ree aY& Age-e-5/ /(%i e'eue. c•' 7 k/e dr /veiva !s I Lie GG� feet A.g`r5 t Ar .c cct c(-- .G'�1 -S � d-e•e_ /f %fiz sue 1 ' / l� s V ads s2 e, ar 1//cam � ve,) cre4 e`q GutO e- iegieRe Apt, . Atc 744e, 1. * -��.5j `,v17`zt• �t�t�0" g� yes , ig/ � . is al p � � co-; �� �s to t. - / � / r D 1 �� 5x(`1-4- -e (c. .Cr t oc-4- }-.� Nic,S� i' fi r� ""�-' �• ' E G�o;su -re - � �,. � . G { a -Y e 2,V Y PLC -G-oc. �. /)_,‘ 7ci*. //ma eta rekSree.-C.44,5 /'"o- '1'IGt.eyet • C- ��e.c.- a ,,:,,: n,,,. w. w,:. V.,. M. Sr..,•...,.,..,,, Y..,..Y :.:..,, ,•......: .a» a. ,:v.,.v.,,,,w,...,.o..,.:weene. TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. - 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila WA 98188 - (206) 433 -0179 09/18/92 - 1146 6.1/1,4,(4,6fs ; 1 V -leoelop fliotAdok Yndar& ex1A/6 L(191/6 15 CAlektti kA (-ovverALI 04' Rh or& 514,491,2D b 2 ifies bnit I se d) SDA-Auutti Pieo //8 0i) iA) etect,c, Li,c1ye ntetse, tThOtL1 S'o f(A) /1AA,9ill/ (cL, l/t414,041 Vitt= Ake.Q.cL . youicis okt c4 +Le- 55 c,i,v—.41A, s,?4,42,U, IA-1(2t. •." 1 4 1 . , 6nL44rnC,A`7.`!. % SfY`l: le:V.,4 6 "*Ve+61.N, a1PISA 'xr JSVXRx W4414:unavr r a » ez a rn» rx. rv�w .a:.e�.+ra.:..w+4. "mifxrSaw.uhw Rl x.KMVf,+,2FV. r Ftc_ :;'tPigr SLYsis DWW _) JULY 2o I i=1 A comparison between Figure 5, Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment and Table IV, Mitigation Proportionate Fairshare Costs shows how access to the Outback Steakhouse could be enhanced by improvements programmed by the City of Tukwila. From this, it is apparent that only those improvements at Southcenter Parkway /Strander Boulevard and Southcenter Parkway/Minkler Boulervard pertain. Fairshare mitigation costs are therefore appropriatly computed as follows: Table V, Developer Proportionate Share Contribution Project Cost per Trip Number of Trips Fairshare Cost Southcenter /Strander $ 140 /21:14 $ - widen for WB left turns A Southcenter Parkway/Minkler $ 137 / 3% r $ i1. 1 6ePA68 Conclusions 13 Recommended Total Developer Contribution = $ l The following conclusions may be drawn. 1. The project will generate some 610 vehicular trips per day with 48 of these in the evening peak hour. 2. Including this project with background traffic growth does not appear to alter arterial levels of service during the morning, noon, or evening peak hours. 3. On the strength of the trip generation data included herein, the analogy method based distribution adds little traffic to key area intersections. 4. No intersection through which 10 or more site generated trips pass will experience any reduction in level of service as a direct result of site generated traffic. Adequate levels of service will remain through the horizon year of 2010. 5. Existing roadway and associated traffic controls are adequate to accommodate potential future site related traffic with no need for modification or revision. 6. Given continued adequate operations, no mitigation measures are needed as a direct result of the Outback Steakhouse. It may be appropriate however, to contribute, on a proportionate fairshare basis, to proprammed future improvements. 7. Finally, there is a significant difference between the peak hours of operation of the adjacent street system and the Outback Steakhouse. The former tends to be in the 3:15 to 4 :15 interval while the latter occurs much later in the evening. Adequate reserve capacity will therefore remain available to Outback patrons well beyond the horizon year of 2010 and there will be no need for infrastructure improvements as a direct result of the Outback Steakhouse. Christopher Brown Cu Associate 879 Rainier Avenue N.. Suite A Rcnton. WA 98055-1380 (206) 772 -1188 o. SUBMITTED TO: l` I Bldg. Planning r f — Ceke/Q Fire Jy Cy, CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 'tt�LK7 DATE: Cq-- c71 PLAN CHECK/PERMIT NUMBER: , DYl7 ` 01 v 0 PROJECT NAME: OuTha 51-eal- ha � PROJECT ADDRESS: 16,0 0 ( O ((J :ier Py CONTACT PERSON. I t Ci( L?I'L REVISION SUMMARY: (5Ci pplgInP,n 6a. ( 6e0 / ec L / ccc( leAL-2. AJY) - COoir REVISION SUBMITTAL SHEET NUMBER(S) "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. CITY OF T TUKWILA SEP 08 1997 PERMIT CENTER &n eot. 5ae7rvc CITY USE ONLY Public Works 3/19/96 R 0 B FOSSATTI '1 A S S O C I A T E S CONSULTING ENGINEERS September 8, 1997 Dear Mr. Griffin: Sincerely, R T Crystal Kolke Senior Plan Reviewer CLK:2 a:1RFA\97t11^2.doc Mr. Duane Griffin City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 cc: Mr. Jim Holtz Merrick Lentz Architect 1800 - 136th Place NE, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION 2030 FIRST AVENUE SUITE 203 SEATTLE, W SIIINrrON 911121 • RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWIIA SEP 0 8 1997 PERMIT CENTER TELEPIIONE: (206) 266.11103 • • FAX: (206) 259 -0107 Regarding: 97 -T -11 (Outback Steakhouse) RFA #97102 -11 We have reviewed information for the proposed project with the structural provisions of the 1994 Edition of the Uniform Building Code as adopted and amended by the City of Tukwila. We have no additional comments for this project. Enclosed are the drawings, calculations, geotechnical report, and other miscellaneous information for your use. We have forwarded a copy of this letter to Merrick Lentz Architect for your convenience. If you have any questions or require any additional clarification, please call me directly at (425) 255 -3099. ROBERT FOSSATTI ASSOCIATES, INC., P.S. 08/28/1997 10:59 2067477149 CMA MERRICK • LENTZ ARCHIT DATE: TO: AT N: FAX NO: SUBJECT: FROM: PAGE 01 CITY O E UKW uST 28 AUG 2 8 1997 c.rN Of TUKWIlA PERMIT CENTER - Goa uo You 431 -3(d c Wc'+ N1 h5 Item 001145a. rI - oU.E 7140,4PS ACC. 12104, Ck 3t''L MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT 1800 - 136th Place N. E., Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone: (206) 747 -3177 FAX: (206) 747 -7149 AS 1 111 tot K etrri -Otte 11 m E Nfls ISEacri • A 111$410e_ coNCE fDQ. a Plao Jft'f . eouwycv APSE " E P(s - re; Thy entre peout 're itat5 wl�nl,� - 1m6 Q.1; mfrwI►. mewl t5 f.€5outiev PL toi'rrer m I✓ - rODor - t' ge k OiNc 6:10 ►1zEme , i'o 'sxt1t; ?oo btoE5itok) s 1 ITEM 2!. t4 E, 4 JE AN ofEigirblt te o'' To 1 oN 5 ro , ear IT 15 Not C.e E'e To 06 (40frr Is RMoIP, Q - to SkrI%`( - r cioNlcE SS . 1. to OE P4CED To PE Jb -w ADDo iTi o C 15T Nl , be cep.) - fry S•ot� E�41� C'C DL�TE. 0.1117g ��°►•i N1 6.013.4 - The CAAVADZT Sak,5 IaoeT A ∎10 OE n r punt 'ri>1 ALT Ac 60174K4 W of AS A SPE iAt. IN 5 mcc . 2 . WL 1 'co 17 AfAnnotortu ectax5 tittEtZ W a.k.f3 "euu U k to Ttin► Pacev? 15 IT IS Wvii+1 1 t wr oP - 14)4 1) ao w uE `e 5'60&c. g .o .14 . Qumrrs ? AtSo, I P rrt6 "t1h5 Mum IS tai PowN1 TOE Sit4011.4 SvrE I Yne P-a 1' 'r P(4.1 'ReYi e rr. f leosE Po►SP 'C,o - n-h6 -r r»Y, As The DZI re- mur (AAt1; Wt rr tte N6ze r pRoasivi35 To 6e > - ro 1,0 lie Sit. Maoris fob *a. time ILL s W:tt'C11•Y f"ve. 4ovQ. &3tA. eft ce ilaWEAPC. elas PAGE 1 OF I PAGES. City of Tukwila August 25, 1997 Mr. Rick Lentz Merrick Lentz Architect 1800 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite #100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Dear Mr. Lentz: Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director SUBJECT: LETTER OF INCOMPLETE REVISION Development Permit Application Number D97 -0180 Outback Steakhouse 16510 Southcenter Py John W. Rants, Mayor This letter is to inform you that your revision submittal for the above referenced permit received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center on August 15, 1997, was determined to be incomplete. Before your revision can begin the plan review process all items on the plan reviewer's list must be completed. Upon review by the Public Works Department it was determined that item numbers 17 and 21 were not submitted. Until these items have been submitted your revision cannot be reviewed any further. For your information I have enclosed another copy of Public Work's comments. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. If your revision does not require revised plans but requires additional reports or other documentation please submit four (4) copies of each document. In order to better expedite your resubmittal a Revision Sheet must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions please contact me at the City of Tukwila Permit Center at (206) 431- 3672. Sincerely, -141cte 0 9. , 79,66(5(7 0 Kelcie J. Peterson Permit Coordinator Enclosures File: D97 -0180 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431 �.c DATE: City of Tukwila July 17, 1997 PROJECT NAME: Outback Steak House PERMIT NO.: D97 -0180 AT.V. t , C'. 1 5JT. tricr',C'r» 16 Awl' 4"Mit Department of Public Works Ross A. Earnst, P. E., Director PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer at (206) 433 -0179, if you have any questions regarding the following comments. 1) National Geodetic Vertical Datum (1929) shall be used as the vertical reference. No vertical datum is indicated on the plan. A FEMA approved benchmark shall be utilized. John W. Rants, Mayor 2) Verify Southcenter Parkway right -of -way. Label the centerline shown on the plan. Is the identified centerline the street centerline or the right -of -way centerline? The west property line is shown incorrectly. 3) Location for the irrigation water line tap and size of the irrigation water meter on the landscape plans don't match the civil drawings. Sheet L2 (landscape Irrigation Plan) shows a new irrigation 1" deduct meter tapped of the existing water meter on Southcenter Parkway. Sheet C3 shows a 1 1/2" irrigation water meter on the south side of the proposed building. Specify size and type of the irrigation water meter (deduct water meter or water only water meter). 4) Storm drainage pipe between catch basin #5 and catch basin #6 is specified as 12" on sheet C1 but sheet C3 shows the same pipe as 6 ". 5) On sheets C2 and C3 clarify where does storm drainage from the existing catch basin type II - 48" diameter (rim elevation = 27.64) connects to. Show existing storm drainage system on Southcenter Parkway. 6) Show the domestic water service line from the proposed water meter to the building. Specify pipe material, type of pipe bedding and backfill materials (include percent compaction). The proposed building needs to be protected by a reduced pressure device after the water meter. 7) Cross - reference mechanical plans sheet number for double detector check valve assembly (DDCVA) and the fire line service. Specify the pipe size on the plans. llE= 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 433.0179 • Fax (206) 431.3665 u1C.tii�14 !i h,: xF. a e,4V"ai,ia:.,,emtes :,;r:vs3C.t "-, - 1" 13) Show a cross- section detail of the sanitary sewer casing. 8) Specify size of th " Base interceptor and cross - referent the appropriate sheets of. mechanical plans. La el sewer pipe size leading to and from the grease interceptor. Verify sewer pipe size between the 6" clean -out and sanitary sewer man hole #1. Sheet C1 calls for 6" sanitary side sewer and sheet C3 shows the same pipe as 8" sanitary sewer man hole #1 shows INV. in as 6 ". 9) Show roof drains and foundation drains on the site plan and how they connect to the proposed storm drainage system. 10) Specify size of the existing storm drainage pipe between catch basin #4 and existing catch basin not found in the field. The existing catch basin not found in the field shall be raised to grade. 11) Is the coalescing plate oil water separators invert in and invert out the same. If yes, please indicate which way the storm sewer is flowing and what section of the parking lot is being treated. 12) Revise "CAUTION!!!" note on sheet C -3 to include the existing water main. Also label the size and location of the above water main. 14) Clarify the 2.0' overhang on "monolithic curb and sidewalk," ECC /Pavement Section" and on both sides of the pavement cross - section on sheet C4. What type of overhang is it? 15) Show sanitary side sewer profile all the way to the clean -out. Sanitary sewer manhole is different on plan Sheet C3 and profile on sheet C4 16) PVC pipe material is not allowed for the storm sewer. Revise flow splitter catch basin and call out installation on sheet C4. ccess and pedestrian connection during construction shall be addressed. Describe plans for the southern driveway during construction. An alternative access plan needs to be provided based on apparent closure of the southern driveway. This alternate access will require a separate street use permit from Public Works. Pedestrian access shall be available at all times across the southern driveway. 18) Show a roadway pavement patching and repair detail for the sanitary sewer crossing. 19) Show traffic lanes on Southcenter Parkway. Two southbound traffic lanes on Southcenter Parkway might be lost during the boring operations for the sanitary sewer installation. Night time work from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. will be allowed for boring work in the right -of -way. For potholing operations in the northbound direction, the standard hours of 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. shall be used. Pedestrian connection shall be unrestrained at all times. Only one northbound lane may be closed at any given time. During the non- S, working hours, the pit(s 'all be covered with a steel plate an covered with cold mix asphalt. 20) Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan to Public Works for approval ten days prior to the commencement of any work within the City right -of -way. Sanitary sewer crossing design and construction shall include a geotechnical aluation of existing conditions (see attached reports by RZA dated 7/10/88 and 7/29/88) and provide any additional boring /geotechnical information to satisfy the design and construction requirements. The geotechnical engineer shall make final determination that the design satisfies the construction requirements. 22) Only an outside drop (if needed) can be utilized inside the existing sewer manhole for the proposed sewer. An inside drop will not be allowed. 23) The Traffic Impact Analysis that was prepared by Christopher Brown and Associates, dated April 24, 1997, needs to be revised to include projected horizon year 2010. The April 24, 1997 report calls for 2001. The revised Traffic Impact Analysis shall . also include traffic mitigations per attached Mitigation Proportionate Fair Share Cost information. Ms. Joanna J. Spencer Department of Public Works City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Dear Ms. Spencer: At the request of Mr. Rick Lentz of the Merrick Lentz Architects I am enclosing a copy of my'August 21st memorandum which addresses the issues you have noted in your memorandum dated July 12th of this month. As you will see, the site traffic is forecast to use the southern driveway in toto. Even then and, as such, no measurable nor SEPA significant impacts will be encountered. Indeed, from our observations, to the knowledgeable local driver working in the adjacent office building the southern driveway is the driveway or choice since he is assured easy access to the peak hour traffic stream. Concerning driveway closures there is no need to provide an alternate driveway; rather, a uniformed flagger at the remaining main driveway over the peak hour will be far more beneficial. I believe this covers the issues you have raised. Yours truly, C. V. Brown, P.E. Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Driveway Traffic Operations (North and South Driveways) cvb /s encl. cc Mr. Rick Lentz, A.I.A. Merrick Lentz Architects Mr. Rick Tompkins, P.E. Pacific Engineering Christopher brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., guile A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 Fax 772 -4321 August 21, 1997 Trunk Endinecrs t5 Transportation Planners 01 $0 `RECEIVE€ ik 7 `if Mi. T UKWILr PUBLIC WMI'.. To: From: Date: Re: MEMORANDUM Mr. Rick Lentz, A.I.A. Merrick Lentz Architects Mr. Rick Tompkins, P.E. Pacific Engineering Chris Brown, P.E. August 21, 1997 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Driveway Traffic Operations (North and South Driveways) V The 8/12/97 memorandum from Ms. Joanna Spencer of the City of Tukwila Department of Public Works has identified the need for additional. analyses. This includes the following items. 1. Existing traffic volumes at both north and south driveways. 2. Trip generation and distribution to these driveways. 3. Queuing analysis for Southcenter Parkway, N/B and S/B traffic. In accordance with this request (Item 1) we have obtained the p.m. peak hour traffic volumes for these two driveways. The data is schematically shown on Figure 'A' attached to this memorandum. In addition to the schematic diagram, we are also enclosing the raw field data for the main driveway since it contains additional detailed information with respect to trucks (by axle), buses, pedestrians and also identifies the four (4) consecutive 15- minute intervals that define the actual peak hour. In this case it is from 3:45 to 4:45 pm. You will note that this figure also includes the main driveway data for the hotel as well as the adjacent multi -story office building. Since both facilities are served by this driveway it is an important consideration. Not all driveway volumes originate at the hotel and, also, some office building traffic went to the south and parked at the hotel, no doubt for happy hour or some other late afternoon activity. Indeed, in addition to the above, it is interesting to note the cross traffic (north and south movements) on what is identified RECEIVED AUG 221997 PUBLIC WORKS Christopher Brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. (Suite A -201 Qenton. WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 -/ To: Mr. Rick Lentz, A.I.A. Merrick Lentz Architects Mr. Rick Tompkins, P.E. Pacific Engineering Page. 2. MEMORANDUM as the East Circulation Driveway. On this date, of the 10 v.p.h. southbound trips, five of these (or fifty percent) continued to the south driveway in order to exit onto Southcenter Boulevard by making unencumbered free right turns for the northbound through arterial trip. This movement was apparently deemed necessary by these motorists with local knowledge since from about 4:15 on it is far easier to enter the northbound through traffic stream and then weave over to the second (inner) lane in order to make the left turn at the signal at Klickitat Drive via the southern driveway. Of course, even then with only 5 v.p.h. it is still a very small volume. It is of consequence. Second, the trip generation and distribution is the same as shown on Figure 5 of the Outback Steakhouse TIA, page 8. You will recall the traffic study assumed all traffic from and to the steakhouse would use a single driveway, on completion of the project. Given the easy access the south driveway affords, as borne out by our peak hour observations, we see no reason to alter that assumption. The peak hour data for the project is described on Figure 'B' also attached. In the case of Figure 'B' we have assumed a completion in 1997 although it probably makes little difference if it were taken out to the year 2000. This is because under the ITE assumptions of the original TIA we have not assumed any pass -by traffic or, in this case, that any of patrons at the restaurant would come from the Doubletree Suites hotel or from the office building, an assumption that is extremely conservative given the number of vehicles actually observed driving from the office building to the hotel. Incidentally, I contacted staff at the Doubletree Suites hotel on . the day of these traffic counts. It was fully booked. Thus, the driveway data can be taken as a worst case for the peak hour. The third item requested in the DPW memorandum of 8/12/97 is a queuing analysis with the forecast data. Christopher Brown C4 Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., (Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772 -1188 H0MChM044414WocW:M. O. To: Mr. Rick Lentz, A.I.A. Merrick Lentz Architects Mr. Rick Tompkins, P.E. Pacific Engineering Page. 3. Attached are the computer output sheets for current and future operations. They are numbered pages 1 through 8. Pages 1 through 4 are the current driveway operational status while the "with project" operations are on pages 5 through 8. Briefly the following computational results may be noted. Intersection North Driveway South Driveway MEMORANDUM TABLE I Levels of Service on Southcenter Parkway Current With Year Project LOS Delay Queue LOS Delay Queue sec's Veh. sec's Veh. Westbound Left F 100.1 3.7 F 109.7 3.8 Westbound Right B NA 0.4 B NA 0.4 Southbound Left C 0.3 0.3 C 0.3 0.3 Westbound Left F 39.4 1.8 F 54.2 2.9 Westbound Right B NA 0.0 B NA 0.2 Southbound Left C 0.3 0.0 C 0.7 0.4 In the above table the queue lengths are computed in tenths of a vehicle. Obviously these are to be rounded up to whole numbers. You may note that the data for current traffic conditions is confirmed by actual field observations. For example, at no time were more than four vehicles waiting to exit the north driveway nor did the south driveway have more then three waiting vehicles. Christopher Brown t Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772.1188 To: Mr. Rick Lentz, A.I.A. Merrick Lentz Architects Mr. Rick Tompkins, P.E. Pacific Engineering Page. 4. MEMORANDUM The main concern the city DPW may have is whether or not the project will compromise traffic operations on the through traffic lanes of Southcenter Boulevard. It is recommended that when a driveway is to be blocked for utility work, and such blockage extends over a peak hour (a.m., noon, or p.m.) then a uniformed flagger be engaged to serve traffic at the open driveway on Southcenter Parkway. With the foregoing, I trust the traffic issues have been addressed. xnwuarv.r.n The answer is NO. Mainline traffic operations will not be impacted to any degree. At worst a southbound left turn delay may increase by a tenth of a second, theoretically. In practice it will not be possible to measure the delay. Likewise queuing in the center two way left turn lane will not be altered. What is there today will continue in the future. On the driveways themselves the only change will be an increase in the westbound left turn movement. The increase in delay is from 10 to 15 seconds, in round numbers. With very few vehicles making this turning movement it will not impact the driveways, either. Finally, Comment Item 17 looks to the need for an alternate access when utility work is under way. With rather modest peak hour volumes on either driveway the need for another access when one of these is being closed for sewer work is doubtful. In the heaviest peak hour of the day there will be delay but, if such delay is sufficient to induce some kind of inappropriate driver behavior the easiest and best remedy is to hire a uniformed flagger for the north driveway for only the p.m. peak hour. He will have the ability to produce breaks in the queues that back up from the signal at Klickitat Drive so that driveway traffic can enter either northbound or southbound traffic streams. Christopher Brown CI Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 J South Driveway FIGURE 'A' North Driveway Current P.M. Peak Hour Volumes, August 20, 1997. Current Driveway Peak Hours Volumes /6 ■•■••■•••■710. 24 One-way Driv( 'McDonalds Christopher Brown a Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. Suite A-201 Renton. WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 TIME EG +boynd• �c r7 a jc. r•- ��c —w her- ;-h.boond s'�( f?Ay) Sov-w,+ cvnc! r /�IN I s �i� We ovr• u � / �/! G ' / r i r' - ygo - ys L S I R L S R LH R L[ S R / Q I 2s7 / ..j ,-/ / r A1F(' - -Vg \24 2U' 2 ° , ? 2 / /' - /f //, '5 s/ . / 0 25 3 ..?/ -f y//5"-w G /5 0 26 /2 /g 11--- // 2 70,/5-1 0 2 , /&ri.r C) I rr 4x . 4 • l / MilliI Sal I ___I___I� MENEM 1 0 0 2 0 _ 2 I '‘. G ..SF I . .5' .2-r. •7e /71v /z f° I G/ Ol 07 1 /V °/ I0 (/ o•' I I I I ___I��� I I ���I��� ' . of TOTAL �■.- I a ....._� r� oJ EC7- DATE INTERSECTION O F : , -4l i/'/r' /L /h TIME -��- TO . 5 TRAFFIC VOLUME SUMMARY til'T /C DAY it(i/ A N D J . A C3 -,�f.- ?Ai,/ P= PEAK HOUR ,».�•.. North Driveway FIGURE 'IV South Driveway >1. Et cU 0 r1 4.) 0 1-1 C.) 4-) CO ( TI Note: For site p.m. peak hour volumes and trip assignment see Figure 5, page 8, TIA dated 7/20/97. Driveway Volumes With Project Christopher brown 4 Asiociates 879 Painier Avenue N., (Suite A-201 Penton, WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c OTBK-P1 .HCO Page 1 ,.--- Center For Microcomputers In Transportation .....," .. University of Florida .512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Southcenter Pkwy Major Street Direction..., NS Length of Time Analyzed..: 60 (min) : Analyst C. V. Brown Date of Analysis .8/21/97 Other Information Current (1997) P.M. Peak Hour Volumes w /o Project Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection No Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's Northbound L T R 0 2 1 N 1207 14 .95 .58 1 Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road Southbound L T R 1 2 0 27 1029 .75 .87 -1 0 0 1 0.96 Adjustment +Factors Vehicle - Critical. Maneuver Gap (tg) 5.50 5.50 6.50 7.00 E North Driveway Eastbound L T R 0 0 0 Westbound L T R 1 0 1 13 .65 Follow-up . Time (tf) 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 000i 55 .73 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 L4; Movement WB L' WB R SB L Flow Rate (pcph) .0111■1••• HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c OTBK-P1.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-Free State: Step 2: LT from Major Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-Free State: Step 4: LT from Minor Street • Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 'Movement Capacity: (pcph) Intersection Performance Summary ' Avg. 95% Move Shared Total Queue Cap Cap Delay Length (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) 20 24 75 659 34 346 Intersection 497.5 6.2 11.5 Delay = WB 636 659 • 659 0.89 •SB 1295 346 346 ( 0.90 WB 2490 27' 0.90 0.90 0.90 24 3.7 F 0.4 B 0.3 C 3.0 sec/veh EB NB . Approach LOS Delay (sec/veh) 100. 0.3 000: Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's Vehicle Maneuver Northbound L T R 0 2 1 N 1214 19 .95 .58 .1 Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road Southbound L T R 1 2 0 15 .75 0 0 1 0.96 514 .87 -1 N Adjustment Factors Critical Gap (tg) 5.50 5.50 6.50 7.00 • Eastbound L •T R 0 0 0 IL) HCS: •Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c • OTBK-P2A.HCO Page 1 Streets: (N-S) Southcenter Pkwy • (E-W ) South Driveway Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst • C. V. Brown Date of Analysis • 8/21/97 Other Information Current (1997) P.M. Peak Hour Volumes w /o Project Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection Westbound' L T R 1 0 1 16. • 27 .65 .73 0 1.00 • 1.00 Follow-up Time (tf) 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 0003 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection • Step 1: RT from Minor Street wB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 639 Potential Capacity: (pcph) '657 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 657 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.94 Step 2.: LT from Major Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-Free State: Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) WB L 25 62 WB R 37 657 SB L • 19 339 SB 1311 339 339 0.94 1890 66 0.94 0.94 0.94 62 HCS Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c OTBK-P2A.HCO Page 2 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB'. EB • Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total 'Queue Rate Cap Cap Delay Length Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) LOS 96.0 • 1.8 F 5.8 0.0 B 11.2 0.0 • C Intersection Delay = 1.0 sec/veh Approach Delay. (sec/veh) 39•4 0.3 0004 HCS Unsignalized I'rtersecions Center For Microcomputers In TransportatiOn 'University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 ...Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Southcenter Pkwy .Major Street Direction.... NS Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst C. V. Brown. Date of Analysis 8/21/97 Other Information P M Peak Hour Volumes . . Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection' - ' No Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's Vehicle Maneuver Northbound L T R 0 - - - 2 1 N 1216 14 .95 .58 1 Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road Release 2.1c . 0TBK71-11'.:HC0 Page 1 Southbound L T R 1 2 0 N 27 1044 .75 .87. -1 0 0 1 0.96 Adjustment Factors Critical Gap (tg) 5.50 5.50 6.50 7.00 (E-W) North Driveway. w/ Project Eastbound L T R 0 0 0 • Westbound L T R 13 .65 0 o o o o 0 0 1.00. 1.00 Follow-up Time (tf) 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 1 5.5 .73 HCB: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 lc OTBKH1J4C0 Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-Free State: Step 2: LT from Major Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-Free State: WB 640 656 656 0.89 Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) 2516 26 0.90 0.90 0.90 23 . Intersection Performance Summary WB, L 20 23 547.8 3.8 F WB R 75 656 6.2 0.4 B SB L 35 342 11.7 0.3 C Intersection Delay = 3.3 sec/veh . EB Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) 109.7 0.3 0 0 0 to HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c OTBK-H2A.HCO. Page 1 Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611-2083 Ph: (904) 392-0378 Streets: (N-S) Southcenter Pkwy Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 60 (min) Analyst C. V. Brown Date of Analysis 8/21/97. Other Information P M Peak Hour Volumes w/ Project Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's Vehicle Maneuver Northbound L T R 0 2 1 N 1214 38 .95 .58 1 Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road Southbound L T. R 1 2 0 N 30 514 .75 .87 0 0 1 0.96 -1 Adjustment Factors Eastbound L T R. 0 0 Critical Gap (tg) 5.50 5.50 6.50 7.00 (E-W) South Driveway Westbound L T R 1 0 1 21 36 .65 .73 0 0 1.00. 1.00 Follow-up Time (tf) 2.10 2.60 3.30 3.40 0007 Step 1: RT from Minor Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-Free State: Step 2: LT from Major Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue-Free State: • Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) ff HCS: nsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c OTBK-H2A.HCO. Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection 639 657 657 0.93 1344 326 326 0.88 1909 0.88 0.88 0.88 SB Step 4: LT from Minor Street WB 64 57 WB R 49 657 5.9 0.2 SB L 38 326 12.5 0.4 Intersection Delay = 1.9 sec/veh NB • Intersection Performance Summary • Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) WB L 32 57 137.1 2.9 C 0.7 0 0 0 h F 54.2 YCnl;� ��t+{�v {Y.S:.$i'. is 1fLY. f. Hi' J, oqil/ df !#'dti >fAt[{�'. >D`.9f4rA:LilklM S)N:wyK'pi£!'iIAYS?K REVISION SUBMITTAL DATE: V6 r 15 l oion PLAN CHECK/PERMIT NUMBER: D 91 `" O ISO PROJECT NAME: O(kHCX1CA S khoc_j€ rf'. I °4 PROJECT ADDRESS: I (D ` 1 10 + ( (- U R l CONTACT PERSON: tCt U JTL PHONE: (4Z5) 147 -- 311/ REVISION SUMMARY: 'I /1S1OtJS PR, ttikhl allThil CO6N101 U SHEET NUMBER(S) "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. SUBMITTED TO: CITY USE ONLY Bldg. tt. rb ta ........✓m.Ww+ Mittlbplw.YLLL4174”. nowYI CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 Planning Fire vM�.MtwewiM1rAM �rw�tnf�NYdN ;Mm11T1NdIbA;M }4�11t`fIMR.Y: Public Works CIT RECEIVED OF TUKWILA PERMIT CENTER 3/19/96 / • ;Date:. 8/14/97 P roject ' Tukwila Outback Restaurant . ' Rick Lentz Company: Merrick Lentz Architects From: Rick Tomkins ti Memo PACIFIC ENGINEERING DESIGN, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS 130 Andover Park East, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98188 Phone: (206) 431 -7970 Fax: (206) 431 -7975 ,Subject: Response to Review Comments Project No.: 97002 "Phone No.: 747 -3177 i.Faic No:: 747 -7149 Sent Via... Fax ❑ Mail ❑ Other Rick, as requested we have revised our civil drawings to address city Public Works Department design review comments. The following is a summary of our responses referencing the city's comment letter dated 7/17/97: 1. An assumed datum is still referenced on our plans. This datum is based on the documented invert of the sanitary sewer manhole which the project will connect to. Permission to use the assumed datum was given to the surveyor (John Knowles) by Robert Tischmak with the city Public Works Department. A review of flood insurance maps indicates that the site lies within Zone "X" which is outside the 500 year floodplain (panel 959 of 1725, Map # 53033C0959 F). 2. The Plans have been revised to show the correct right-of-way for Southcenter Parkway and property line locations based on the boundary survey prepared by John Becker. 3. The size irrigation water line tap has been revised to agree with the landscape plans. The location of the irrigation meter will be revised on the landscape plan to agree with the civil plan. 4. The call -out for the storm pipe downstream of CB #5 has been corrected to show 6" N -12 on both sheets C1 and C3. 5. The plans have been revised to show the existing storm sewer in Southcenter Parkway, thus clarifying where site drainage discharges to. 6. The domestic water service line has been more clearly labeled and reference is made to the city standard detail for material and construction specifications. A pressure reducing valve has been added downstream of the domestic meter and clearly labeled. 7. The fire protection system is "Design Build" by others under separate permit. There is no design on the current Mechanical plans to cross - reference. DCVA and fire service lines are shown on the civil plans and clearly labeled with city standard details referenced. A note has been added stating size and location of these fixtures to be verified by certified sprinkler contractor. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT CENTER 8. Notes have been addd referencing the appropriate Mechanical plan sheet for grease interceptor details. The side sewer label on sheet C3 has been corrected to read 6 ", which is consistent with the other plan sheets. 9. Roof and foundation drains are shown connecting to CB#4, but labels have now been added to more clearly indicate them. 10. The size of the existing storm drain pipe which CB#4 is constructed over is noted on the plans as 12 ". A note has been added to the plans to raise the existing catchbasin which was not found in the field. 11. The CP oil /water separator's invert in and out are the same. Flow arrows have been added to all pipes to indicated flow direction. Treatment area is specified on the "Redevelopment Area Exhibit" included in our original Storm Drainage Report. This exhibit and the rationale for location of the separator are discussed in the report. 12. The "Caution" note has been revised to include the existing city water main. The existing water main has been labeled. 13. A cross - section detail has been added to sheet C4 showing the sanitary sewer casing. 14. The "overhang" referenced in our cross - section details refers to car bumper overhang beyond the wheelstop /curbing. This has been verbally clarified to Joanna Spencer. 15. The sanitary sewer profile has been extended to include the 6" side service (black water portion) all the way to the building. The sanitary manhole rim elevation has bee corrected and is consistently labeled in plan and profile. 16. The plans have been revised to delete any reference to PVC storm pipe. The 6" pipe through the CP oil /water separator has been revised to specify N-12. 17. Notes have been added to the drawings to require pedestrian access be maintained across the southern driveway at all times, and that only one northbound lane may be closed at any time. Permissible nighttime working hours are specified. The Double Tree Suites hotel has two other points of access in addition to the driveway that will be impacted by sewer extension. Considering the limited length of time during which vehicular access will be restricted by the proposed work, the fact that the sewer will be bored and not "open- cut ", and the availability of existing alternative accesses, requiring the construction of an additional temporary access is inappropriate. I have submitted a written request to Joanna Spencer, asking her to rescind any such requirement. 18. The revised plans specify the city standard detail for the pavement patching and repair required as a result of the sewer extension. 19. The plans have been revised to show existing traffic lane delineation. Notes have been added to specify permitted working hours and provide pit cover requirements. 20 A note has been adki to the plans requiring the contractto submit a traffic control plan prior to commencement of construction. ai `p'U4° 21. An addendum to the Geotechnical Report has been ordered which will address the sanitary sewer extension design: 22. A note has been added to the plans requiring the use of an outside drop (if needed) at the connection to the existing sewer manhole. 23. The Traffic Impact Analysis is being revised by Chris Brown to respond to city comments: Attached, please find 4 sets of prints of our revised . drawings for your use in resubmitting to the city. If you have any questions, please give me a call. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Voice: (200,431-3670 • Outback Steakhouse Restaurant - 16510 Southcenter Parkway Permit #.D97 -0180 . Review Comments Response The following are responses to your Planning and Building Division's Review Comments dated July 23, 1997 (response numbers reflect the same comment numbers): PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS . Please review sheet A -l. Raised (3") walkways have been added connecting the hotel and restaurant. In addition, the same treatment has been added to the walkway • between the restaurant and the sidewalk at Southcenter Parkway. • 2. Please review sheet L - 1. Larger trees have been added particularly the east side. • 3. As indicated, our signage consultant will work with the city to resolve any design issues. Please inform me if this will delay issuance of a "Building " permit. BUILDING DIVISION COMMENTS 1. Please review sheet A -1. Additional dimensions and property, lines have been added to the Site Plan for specific building location. 2. Please review sheet A -0. A note which states: "Fire extinguishing systems shall comply with UBC standards 9 -1 and 9 -2." has been added after the construction classification. 1800 - 136th Place N,E., Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 206/747 -3177 • FAX 206/747 -7149 RECEIVED CITY. OF TUKWILA ; 1 PERMIT CENTER Please review sheet A -1. Detectable warning areas have been added to the Site Plan, in four (4) locations: In addition, a curb is indicated for the walkway passing through the landscaping area prior to the connection to the sidewalk along Southcenter Parkway. Also please note that handrails to both sides of the "less than 1:12" ramp have been added with respect to UBC 1106.8.5 4. Please review sheet A -4. Draftstops and a construction note has been added to the Roof Plan at a distance of 60' -0" (maximum) there by offering the option to the General Contractor to sprinkler the mansard or not This is in respect to UBC. 708.3.1.2.2. Please review the Typical Wall Sections an sheet A -5. Wall vents have been .added 'and spacing indicated to promote cross ventilation of the mansard space. Please review sheet FS -1. The seating summary is corrected. However the seat count has since been revised at the bar area. I must admit I too was unsure of the total seat count and had requested calculation formula for future reference and perhaps my oversight was the same as ,yours. The six (6) 36" table tops located South of the Lounge are counted as a two (2) person table not four (4) as I previously assumed. I hope the helps in your calculations. If not, please do not hesitate to call. 7. Please review sheet A -10. I have placed a "One -hour fire resistive shaft assembly" detail on this sheet. After printing I noticed that I did not place a detail bubble on sheet FS -1 indicating the location of the detail. Therefore, I have noted on bluelines (in black ink on sheet FS -1) this bubble and have since made the change to our CAD drawings • insuring that future plans will be correct. Please contact me should you have any' additional comments or concerns. Sincerely, Jim Holtz cc: Doug Franz .'.. �: �" t��tt*. �;BctYX:YM.a.vxen>vnCs�.vcw:.r; art:.: a�xm++c�riw.s�+uMa.rav�a�cw'.r rt�a+w.YN - n•f✓n +w.m +rwM.Vormw.....201. WARMVAW.1 OLVI .! July 23, 1997 Dear Mr. Lentz: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Mr. Rick Lentz Merrick Lentz Architect 1800 - 136th Place Northeast, Suite #100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 SUBJECT: CORRECTION LETTER #1 Development Permit Application Number D97 -0180 Outback Steakhouse 16510 Southcenter Py John W. Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your application for development permit can be approved. All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the same time and reflected on your drawings. I have enclosed review comments from the Building Division, Public Works Department and the Planning Division. At this time the Fire Department has no comments regarding your application for permit. The City requires that two (4) complete sets of revised plans be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal a Revision Sheet must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Corrections /revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions please contact me at the City of Tukwila Permit Center at (206) 431 -3672. Sincerely, t?2 Kelcie J. Peterson Permit Coordinator Enclosures File: D97 -0180 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431.3670 • Fax (206) 431.3665 DATE: June 25, 1997 BUILDING DIVISION PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS PROJECT NAME: Outback Steakhouse PLAN CHECK NO.: D97- 0180 PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Bob Benedicto at (206) 431 -3670, if you have any questions regarding the following comments. Page 1 of 1 1. A specific description for the location of the proposed restaurant is required. Provide dimensions on the Site plan to locate building in relation to at least one property line and provide the proposed dimension between the restaurant building and the nearest projection of the Double Tree Suites hotel. UBC 106.3.3 2. Building construction type is classified as Type V -N, sprinklered. Provide a note following this classification which states: "Fire extinguishing systems shall comply with UBC Standards 9 -1 and 9 -2." UBC 904.1.2 3. The accessible route of travel from the main building entrance to the public way includes a ramp from the the front walkway down to the parking lot level. Detail or otherwise note the maximum slope requirements for this ramp on the plan, and specify the method for providing edge protection per UBC 1106.8.7. In addition show a curb ramp per UBC 1106.4.7 at the point that the accessible route of travel crosses the existing curb and the landscape strip. UBC 1103.2.2 4. Provide draftstop(s) at the mansard roof space in accordance with UBC 708.3.1.3. Provide said draftstop(s) such that the distance between draftstops will not exceed 100 feet. UBC 708.3.1.2.2 5. Cross ventilation is required for the mansard roof areas. Plans show a continuous vent opening at the soffit of the mansard roof but no form of ventilation for the upper portion of said roof space. Note or otherwise detail the method for providing cross ventilation of this space. UBC 1505.3 6. The seating summary on sheet FS -1 lists an occupant load which is less than the seating indicated by plan. This seating count will be referenced on the certificate of occupancy and will be the basis for posting of the occupant load for the dining room and the lounge. Please clarify. UBC 1002.1 & 1002.3 7. A one hour fire resistive shaft assembly is required to be provided to enclose the exhaust duct from the Type 1 kitchen exhaust hood. Provide a detail for a proposed listed shaft assembly or note on plans that this is to be a deferred submittal per UBC 106.3.4.2. Note: deferred submittals will require additional review and, depending on the complexity, may require additional plan check fees. RSB. City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director June 17, 1997 Department. of Community Development Planning Division Comments The Board of Architectural Review adopted the staff report to build an Outback Steakhouse Restaurant (May 22, 1997) with the following conditions, to be addressed prior to issuance of their building permit: 1. Add a three (3) inch raised sidewalk for pedestrians connecting the restaurant and hotel. Should the sidewalk interfere with storm drainage, a clearly delineated crosswalk may be substituted. 2. Mods landscape requirements to augment landscaping around the restaurant building in place of along Southcenter Parkway. Specifically, add larger trees around the building base, particularly on the east side of the restaurant facing the hotel. 3. Staff will work with applicant to modify the design of the pole sign to reflect the architectural character and theme of the restaurant. Prepared By: Alexa Berlow 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 41313670 • Fax (206) 4313665 tk it Y;? ib. 4 ? *e457.��..w..•aruw:(.o::.. n..n.. „ .T: a;. s...,.. e.. v.., we•. rua:. _rrv...xr�...n.r+Knr'�e.wxwtm,. arww .r,�.x.,tae..n.+�...,....,.. .........r,�. w.... .,,,,.. uR.t., rtw.t 49: •:7''4etq)roohv'f:Ysd!2 sm': th:' trx+ o*«:ct!1.7N7w/%tVitnpr'OtY:;:'I ;e.tm'a?: DATE: l: City of Tukwila July 17, 1997 PROJECT NAME: Outback Steak House PERMIT NO.: D97 -0180 Department of Public Works Ross A. Eamst, P. E., Director PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer at (206) 433 -0179, if you have any questions regarding the following comments. 1) National Geodetic Vertical Datum (1929) shall be used as the vertical reference. No vertical datum is indicated on the plan. A FEMA approved benchmark shall be utilized. John W. Rants, Mayor 2) Verify Southcenter Parkway right -of -way. Label the centerline shown on the plan. Is the identified centerline the street centerline or the right -of -way centerline? The west property line is shown incorrectly. 3) Location for the irrigation water line tap and size of the irrigation water meter on the landscape plans don't match the civil drawings. Sheet L2 (landscape Irrigation Plan) shows a new irrigation 1” deduct meter tapped of the existing water meter on Southcenter Parkway. Sheet C3 shows a 1 1/2" irrigation water meter on the south side of the proposed building. Specify size and type of the irrigation water meter (deduct water meter or water only water meter). 4) Storm drainage pipe between catch basin #5 and catch basin #6 is specified as 12" on sheet Cl but sheet C3 shows the same pipe as 6 ". 5) On sheets C2 and C3 clarify where does storm drainage from the existing catch basin type II - 48" diameter (rim elevation = 27.64) connects to. Show existing storm drainage system on Southcenter Parkway. 6) Show the domestic water service line from the proposed water meter to the building. Specify pipe material, type of pipe bedding and backfill materials (include percent compaction). The proposed building needs to be protected by a reduced pressure device after the water meter. 7) Cross - reference mechanical plans sheet number for double detector check valve assembly (DDCVA) and the fire line service. Specify the pipe size on the plans. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 433.0179 • Fax (206) 431.3665 (eG:n;ac:' + »,o;r:nz. r. rrn.: �xa:..:,i.. .......r r. ae +"^A"". �YN whrT.S:^y:`aCY: ar 8) Specify size of tl( grease interceptor and cross- refere> t t the appropriate sheets of mechanical plans. Label sewer pipe size leading to and from the grease interceptor. Verify sewer pipe size between the 6" clean -out and sanitary sewer man hole #1. Sheet C1 calls for 6" sanitary side sewer and sheet C3 shows the same pipe as 8" sanitary sewer man hole #1 shows INV. in as 6 ". 9) Show roof drains and foundation drains on the site plan and how they connect to the proposed storm drainage system. 10) Specify size of the existing storm drainage pipe between catch basin #4 and existing catch basin not found in the field. The existing catch basin not found in the field shall be raised to grade. 11) Is the coalescing plate oil water separators invert in and invert out the same. If yes, please indicate which way the storm sewer is flowing and what section of the parking lot is being treated. 12) Revise "CAUTION!!!" note on sheet C -3 to include the existing water main. Also label the size and location of the above water main. 13) Show a cross - section detail of the sanitary sewer casing. 14) Clarify the 2.0' overhang on "monolithic curb and sidewalk," ECC/Pavement Section" and on both sides of the pavement cross - section on sheet C4. What type of overhang is it? 15) Show sanitary side sewer profile all the way to the clean -out. Sanitary sewer manhole is different on plan Sheet C3 and profile on sheet C4 16) PVC pipe material is not allowed for the storm sewer. Revise flow splitter catch basin and call out installation on sheet C4. 17) Access and pedestrian connection during construction shall be addressed. Describe the plans for the southern driveway during construction. An alternative access plan needs to be provided based on apparent closure of the southern driveway. This alternate access will require a separate street use permit from Public Works. Pedestrian access shall be available at all times across the southern driveway. 18) Show a roadway pavement patching and repair detail for the sanitary sewer crossing. 19) Show traffic lanes on Southcenter Parkway. Two southbound traffic lanes on Southcenter Parkway might be lost during the boring operations for the sanitary sewer installation. Night time work from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. will be allowed for boring work in the right -of -way. For potholing operations in the northbound direction, the standard hours of 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. shall be used. Pedestrian connection shall be unrestrained at all times. Only one northbound lane may be closed at any given time. During the non- :•. working hours, the pitUthall be covered with a steel plate ."-zi covered with cold mix asphalt. 20) Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan to Public Works for approval ten days prior to the commencement of any work within the City right-of-way. 21) Sanitary sewer crossing design and construction shall include a geotechnical evaluation of existing conditions (see attached reports by RZA dated 7/10/88 and 7/29/88) and provide any additional boring/ geotechnical information to satisfy the design and construction requirements. The geotechnical engineer shall make final determination that the design satisfies the construction requirements. 22) Only an outside drop (if needed) can be utilized inside the existing sewer manhole for the proposed sewer. An inside drop will not be allowed. 23) The Traffic Impact Analysis that was prepared by Christopher Brown and Associates, dated April 24, 1997, needs to be revised to include projected horizon year 2010. The April 24, 1997 report calls for 2001. The revised Traffic Impact Analysis shall also include traffic mitigations per attached Mitigation Proportionate Fair Share Cost information. eake xwnczaaae xa «at R 0 fi E R T FOSSA'I°I't A S S O C I A T E S CONSULTING ENGINEERS July 3, 1997 Mr. Duane Griffin City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Griffin: Regarding: 97 -T -11 (Outback Steakhouse) vm.rca sft,u.. tm-t'tCL i' '} SStimg.' fif!xta z A PROFESSIONAL 2030 FIRST AVENUE SERVICES SUITE 203 CORPORATION SEA11 LE. 1%ASI IINUTON 118121 6. Calculations should be provided that evaluate chord forces. TEl EPIIONE: (206) 250.1003 FAX: (206) 250.01117 CITY RECEIVED JUL 0 3 1997 PERMIT CENTER RFA #97102-11 We have reviewed information for the proposed project with the structural provisions of the 1994 Edition of the Uniform Building Code as adopted and amended by the City of Tukwila. The following comments should be addressed by the permit applicant: 1. The Timber Section of the Structural Notes, Sheet S4, should reference UBC Table 23 -I -Q, not 31 -I -Q. 2. The Trusses Section of the Structural Notes requires that the roof joists be designed considering snow drift. The snow drift design loads should be noted on the drawings for the truss manufacturer's design information. 3. The drawings should clarify the connection of the walkway posts to the foundation. 4. Page 5 of the calculations shows an uplift force of 7056# at the four front shear walls. An HD8A through two Hem -Fir studs would only be good for 5590 #. Please refer to the Simpson publication "Holdowns for Hem -Fir Lumber" (Form F- HemFir). A sufficient holdown must be provided. 5. Page 5 of the calculations shows 54 feet of shear wall at the left shear wall. It appears that there is more like 42 feet of shear wall available. This will effect the uplift force at these walls. The calculations show that an HTT22 Tension Tie will be provided; however, considering the reduction in capacity for the Hem -Fir studs, the specified tension tie will not be sufficient. The appropriate reduction factor as recommended by the manufacturer must be applied. 7. Material specifications should be provided for the CMU trash enclosure. Since the wall is 8 feet high, calculations should be provided to evaluate structural adequacy. Refer to Sheet A1.1. C ryst 1 Kolke CLK :1 a: AVni 1 ^1.aoc Sincerely, ROBERT FOSSATTI ASSOCIATES, INC.; P: cc: Mr. Jim Holtz Merrick Lentz Architect 1800 - 136th Place NE, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 The above listed review comments should be responded to in itemized letter form. We; therefore, recommend that the permit applicant have the Structural Engineer of Record, Voelker Engineering, Inc:, respond and resubmit two copies of revised drawings and one copy of supplemental structural calculations directly to our office, as required. We have forwarded a copy of this letter to Merrick Lentz Architect for your convenience. If you have any questions or require any additional clarification, please call me directly at (425) 255 - 3099. . 11:4∎1 .Z41i ben W!+ Svc,' t ; zRaiS :at�S+tvaau.•.n.�.;: Fire Department Review Control #D97 -0180 (511) Dear Sir: City of Tukwila Fire Department Thomas P. Keefe, Fire Chief June 13, 1997 Re: Outback Steakhouse - 16510 Southcenter Parkway The attached set of building plans have been reviewed by The Fire Prevention Bureau and are acceptable with the following concerns: 1. The total number of fire extinguishers required for your establishment is calculated at one extinguisher for each 3000 sq. ft. of area. The extinguisher(s) should be of the "All Purpose" (2A, 10B:C) dry chemical type. Travel distance to any fire extinguisher must be 75' or less. (NFPA 10, 3 -1.1) Portable fire, extinguishers shall be securely installed on the hanger or in the bracket supplied, placed in cabinets or wall recesses. The hanger or bracket shall be securely and properly anchored to the mounting surface in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The extinguisher shall be installed so that the top of the extinguisher is not more than 5 feet above the floor and the clearance between the bottom of the extinguisher and the floor shall not be less than 4 inches. Extinguishers shall be located so as to be in plain view (if at all possible), or if not in plain view, they shall be identified with a sign stating, "Fire Extinguisher ", with an arrow pointing to the unit. (NFPA 10, 1 -6.3) (UFC Standard 10 -1) Clear access to fire extinguishers is required at all times. They may not be hidden or obstructed. (NFPA 10, 1 -6.5) John W. Rants, Mayor Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 5754404 • Fay (206) 575.4439 City of Tukwila Fire Department Page number 2 Fire extinguishers require monthly and yearly inspections. They must have a tag or label securely attached that indicates the month and year that the inspection was performed and shall identify the 'company or person performing the service. (NFPA 10, 4 -3, 4 -4 and 4 -4.3) Every six years, dry chemical and halon type fire extinguishers shall be emptied and subjected to the applicable recharge procedures. (NFPA 10, 4 -4.1) If the required monthly and yearly inspections of the fire extinguisher(s) are not accomplished or the inspection tag is not completed, a reputable fire extinguisher service company will be required to conduct these required surveys. (NFPA 10A -4 -4) 2. Commercial -type food heat- processing equipment from which grease -laden vapors emanate in normal cooking application shall be protected by an approved automatic extinguishing system. The extinguisher system shall be interconnected to the fuel and current supply so that the fuel or current is automatically shut off to all equipment under the hood, when the system is actuated. (UFC 1006) A sodium bicarbonate or potassium bicarbonate dry - chemical -type portable fire extinguisher having a minimum rating of 40 -B shall be installed within 30 feet (9144 mm) of commercial food heat - processing equipment, as measured along an unobstructed path of travel. (UFC 1006.2.7) Maintain fire extinguisher coverage throughout. 3. No point in a sprinklered building may be more than 200 feet from an exit, measured along the path of travel. (UBC 1003.4) Exit doors shall swing in the direction of exit travel when serving any hazardous area or when serving an occupant load of 50 or more. (UBC 1004.2) 4. Exit doors from a group A, E or I occupancy having an John W. Rants, Mayor Thomas P. Keefe, Fire Chief Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone (206) 5754404 • Fax (206) 5754439 . %+y?•a a4pA thind.,:io,Vz sntr . :40;W roAvavaraSH,. Page number 3 City of Tukwila Fire Department occupant load of 50 or more shall not be provided with a latch or lock unless it is panic hardware. Aisles leading to required exits shall be provided . from all portions of buildings. Aisles located within an accessible route of travel shall also comply with the Building Code requirements for accessibility. (UFC 1204.1) 5. When two or more exits from a story are required, exit signs shall be installed at the required exits and where otherwise necessary to clearly indicate the direction of egress. (UBC 1013.1) When two or more exits from a story are required and when two or more exits from a room or an area are required by U.B.C. Section 3303, exit signs shall be illuminated. (UBC 1013.3) Internally illuminated exit signs shall have both bulbs working at all times. (UBC 1013.3) 6. Exits shall be illuminated any time the building is occupied with light having an intensity of not less than 1 foot candle at floor level. Fixtures required for exit illumination shall be supplied from separate sources of power for Group I, Divisions 1.1 and 1.2 occupancies and for all other occupancies where the exiting system serves an occupant load of 100 or more. (UBC 1012.1, 1012.2) The power supply for the exit pathway illumination shall normally be provided by the premise's wiring system. In the event of its failure, illumination shall be automatically provided from an emergency system. Emergency system shall be supplied from storage batteries or an on -site generator set and the system shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Electrical Code. (UBC 1012.2) 7. An approved automatic fire sprinkler extinguishing system is required for this project. (City Ordinance John W. Rants, Mayor Thomas P. Keefe, Fire Chief Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 5754404 • Fax (206) 57$4439 Page number #1742) City of Tukwila Fire Department Sprinkler protection shall be extended to all areas where required, including all enclosed areas, below obstructions and under overhangs greater than four feet wide. (NFPA 13 -4- 4.1.3.2.1) 8. All new sprinkler systems and all modifications to existing sprinkler systems shall have fire department review and approval of drawings prior to installation or modification. New sprinkler systems and all modifications to sprinkler systems involving more than 50 heads shall have the written approval of the W.S.R.B., Factory Mutual, Industrial Risk Insurers, Kemper or any other representative designated and /or recognized by The City of Tukwila, prior to submittal to the Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau. No sprinkler work shall commence without approved drawings. (City Ordinance #1742) All sprinkler system plans, calculations and the contractors Materials and Test Certificates submitted to The Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau must be stamped with the appropriate level of competency seal. (WAC 212 -80) 9. Maintain hose station coverage per City Ordinance #1742 and N.F.P.A. 14. Addition /relocation of walls or partitions may require relocating and /or adding hose stations. An approved hose station requires plans review. (Plans must be submitted to the Fire Marshal for approval prior to installation.) (City Ordinance #1742) 10. The fire department connection (FDC) shall be equipped with a 5" Storz fitting(s). (UFC 1003.1.1) 11. An approved manual fire alarm system is required for this project. The fire alarm system shall meet the requirements of the Americans With Disabilities' Act, John W. Rants, Mayor Thomas P. Keefe, Fire Chief Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Part East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 575.4404 • Fax (206) 5754439 Page number 5 City of Tukwila Fire Department chapter 51 -20 WAC (Chapter 31 Accessibility), N.F.P.A. 72 and the City of Tukwila Ordinance #1742. In areas that are not continuously occupied, automatic smoke detection shall be provided at each control unit(s) location to provide notification of fire at that location. (NFPA 1 -5.6) 12. H.V.A.C. units rated at greater than 2,000 cfm require auto - shutdown devices. These devices shall be separately zoned in the alarm panel and local U.L. central station supervision is required. (City Ordinance #1742) 13. Local U.L. central station supervision is required. (City Ordinance #1742) 14. All new fire alarm systems or modifications to existing systems shall have the written approval of The Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau. No work shall commence until a fire department permit has been obtained. (City Ordinance #1742) (UFC 1001.3) 15. All electrical work and equipment shall conform strictly to the standards of The National Electrical Code. (NFPA 70) 16. When walls and ceilings are required to be of fire resistive or noncombustible construction, interior finish materials shall meet the requirements of Uniform Building Code 803. The maximum flame spread class of finish materials used on interior walls and ceilings shall not exceed that set forth in Table No. 8 -B of The Uniform Building Code. (UBC 804.1) 17. Your street address must be conspicuously posted on the building and shall be plainly visible and legible from the street. Numbers shall contrast with their background. (UFC 901.4.4) John W. Rants, Mayor Thomas P. Keefe, Fire Chief Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone (206) 575.4404 • Fax (206) 5754439 _/ City of Tukwila Fire Department a �G1 +Y' ..go „ 5':i 'p bfd %.Gqv. _ •s < ;+"u : { John W. Rants, Mayor Page number 18. Fire hydrants shall conform to American Water Works Association specifications C- 502 -54; it shall be compression type, equipped with two 2 1/2” N.S.T. hose ports and one 5" Storz pumper discharge port, and shall have a 1 1/4" Pentagon open -lift operating nut. Contact The Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau to witness all required inspections and tests. (UFC 10.503) (City Ordinance #1742) This review limited to speculative tenant space only. - special fire permits may be necessary depending on detailed description of intended use. Any overlooked hazardous condition and /or violation of the adopted Fire or Building Codes does not imply approval of such condition or violation. Yours truly, The Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau cc: TFD file ncd Thomas P. Keefe, Fire Chief Headquarters Station: 444 Andover Park East • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 57544404 • Fax (206) 5754439 _/ June 11, 1997 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Crystal Kolke Robert Fossatti Associates Consulting Engineers 2212 Camas Circle S.E. Renton, WA 98055 Regarding: 97 -T -11: Outback Steakhouse (D97- 0180) John W Rants, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Dear Crystal Kolke: Please do structural review per U.B.C., 1994 Edition. Sincerely, \-J.h.6.1)19- g. ' Mt:29 Shellie L. Bates Permit Technician N 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 4313665 J une 10; 1997 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Mr. Jim Holtz Merrick Lentz Architect 1800 136th Place N.E., Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 Dear Mr. Holtz: SUBJECT: Development Permit Application Number D97 -0180 Outback Steakhouse 165XX Southcenter Py This letter is to inform you that your permit application received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center on June 9, 1997, was reviewed at the June 10, 1997 plan review meeting. Your application was determined to be complete. Your permit has begun the plan review process, you will be notified of any required corrections or when your plan is approved. If you have any concerns or questions please contact me at the City of Tukwila Permit Center at (206) 431 -3672. Sincerely, P oi 11 0 Kelcie J. Peterson Permit Coordinator File: D97 -0180 John W. Rants, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax-(206) 4313665 .. - Clryotsaule King Coun ry Mnn w�a -. N+p M7+� . , Seattle -King County Department of Public Health Alonzo L. Plough, Ph.D., MPH, Director May 19, 1997 Merrick Lentz, Architect 1800 136` Place NE, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 Re: Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Dear: Rick We have approved the plan for your food service establishment. Your establishment has been assigned the following business identification number (BID #) HB- 50045.. Please use this BID# in all future contact with us. Before you open for business, you must complete the attached application for a permit and return it with the correct fee. If you open before you obtain your permit, your permit fee will be double. Before you open you need to have an inspection by the Health Department. If you open without the health inspection, you may be closed. Please contact the District Health Office indicated below to schedule the preopening inspection. Be sure all other business inspections are done (plumbing, building, etc.) before you call for your Health Department inspection. Sincerely, onn x. 1Vr • e n Plans Examiner JKM:js Enclosure Eastgate 14350 SE Estgate Way Bellevue, WA 98007 296 -4920 DISTRICT HEALTH CENTERS Northshore North 10808 NE 145th Street 10501 Meridian Ave N Bothell, WA 98011 Seattle, WA 98133 296 - 9787 296 -4838 Alder Square 1404 Central Ave. S, Ste 101 Kent, WA 98032 296 -4708 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 0 9 1997 PERMIT CENTER DT1-OlBb Central 172 - 20th Avenue Seattle, WA 98122 296 -4632 BUSINESS NAME AND ADDRESS: �t Atr4..." 4 4 07aum # I•wsvantemm.e..anh:m.,w¢ wrnev:xr+: rvretr :feIr4!7°C?is;tr!f?IMPY* `f9 Seattle -King County Department of Public Hea. h En , nmcntal Health Division - Licenses and Peryp?ts 999 - 3 ve., Suite 700, - Seattle, WA 98104 - (206) -4727 APPLICATION TO OPERATE A PERMANENT FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT MAILING ADDRESS (if different from above): Signed Date OFFICE USE ONLY �I . BID# 5� t/ PERMIT # APPROVED / / SIGNED DATE DISAPPROVED / / FEE SCHEDULE - SEE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM FEE $ PRORATION (PERIOD - 10 /1 THRU 3/31 ='/2 annual fee) S PENALTY S TOTAL FEE DUE S ESTABLISHMENT INFORMATION PLEASE CHECK ALL BOXES THAT APPLY: / / Change of Ownership / / Permit Renewal / / Sole Owner / / New Operation / / Corporation / / Change of Name* / / Partnership *If name change, what was previous name? WHAT CLASSIFICATION ARE YOU APPLYING FOR? (See reverse) A` If a restaurant or tavern, what is seating capacity? If a restaurant, is establishment 100% non - smoking? / / Yes / / No If a grocery store, # of checkout stands? MANAGER/OPERATOR NAME Name OWNERSHIP INFORMATION NAME OF OWNER (if partnership, list names of all partners. Attach additional sheets if necessary) Address Phone 1• 2 IMPORTANT MESSAGE TO APPLICANT: Please complete all information requested above and return this form and your check to the address at the top of this form. Failure to fully complete form may result in it being returned for completion. All permanent food establishment permits expire on March 31st of the permit year. Renewal applications are mailed each year in late February. This office should be notified of any change in your mailing address. If you do not receive a renewal application by February 28th, please notify this office at the phone number listed above. Late fees are charged if permits are not renewed prior to expiration. CLASS CODE 1.A. RESTAURANTS ((2)) Scating Capity 1 - 7 a S190 (3) Scating Capacacity 76.150 $300 (( )) $430 $555 4 Seating Capacity 151 -250 (5) Scating Capacity over 250 1.B. CATERERS (if not part of another food - service establishment) 1.C.'• FOOD- PROCESSING ESTABLISHMENTS 1.15. SNACK BARS (no food preparation) I.E. MOBILE FOOD - SERVICE UNITS 1) Mobile Food Carts, base fee $185 IA) Additional locations, each S65 2) Restricted Mobile Food Vehicle, base fee $185 2A) Additional vehicles, each S65 3) Unrestricted Mobile Food Vehicle, base fcc $215 3A) Additional vehicles, each $65 1.F. TEMPORARY FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENTS - Food service establishment operating at a fixed location for not more than twenty-one (21) consecutive days in conjunction with a single event or celebration. See fee schedule on Temporary Food Service Application 1:G.1. FOOD DEMONSTRATORS $1 15 1.G.2. FOOD PROMOTERS $250 1.H. T! MS (no food preparation) $90 2.A. 'Y STORES than 4 checkout devices S65 trout devices 5140 ::.ckout devices 5250 2.: ,, BREAKFAST itinental Breakfast 565 ) ku11 Service Breakfast 5155 3 !:TAIL BAKERIES 5155 4. REDUCED FEE ESTABLISHMENTS Religious, charitable, or educational organization or institution with an Internal Revenue Scrvicc 501(C)(3) nonprofit tax - exempt status operating a food - service establishment 550 School lunchroom A fee for applicable category above Vending facility under the supervision of the Washington State Commission for the Blind 'A fee for applicable category above PLAN REVIEW AND REINSPECTION FEES New construction 5200 Remodel 5150 Multiple permits in one facility (2 +) (each) 5100 Cost of service Resubmittal (per hour) Subsequent pre - occupancies, on -site inspection prior to plan submittal, or on -site inspection when no plan review is required 575 Temporary establishment (see Temporary Application Form) Second reinspection :4 fee for applicable category above Permit reinstatement fee following permit suspension Full annual permit fee for applicable category LATE FEES Annual permits, 10 -30 days 25% Annual permits, more than 30 days 50% School lunchroom -0- Seasonal permit MISCELLANEOUS FEES Duplicate permit 525 Change of name, no other change 525 Request for variance $ 150 Check returned by the bank 525 Processing of a refund 525 After hours inspections requested by food establishment owner . Cost of scrvicc Provided, that if the application pertains to a seasonal food - scrvicc establishment or a food - service establishment that is to be operated only after October 1st, in any year, the applicable permit fee shall be one -half (1/2) the annual fee specified above. food/misclfccsched/January 23. 1997 $190' 5190 565 525 • ' - . • • • . . ; • . . • .. ..• . • . • t• 4 ;.; • 4 at "$ it;•1 1,•ke', .•■•• • z ;-• . - • . '•••• 1.4 • • • • L./ R - I 09' t • , - . • .• • ... SIGNATURE ISSUED BY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES 71 i3c,L4 22 I< 1) tEc 0M102119F 5 1:•41.5 > p cr) • otbktia3.doc Christopher brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., (Suite A -201 Penton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 Fax 772 -4321 Traffic Impact Analysis for the Outback Steakhouse RECEIVED in JUL 2 4 1997 Tukwila, Washington TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS July 20, 1997 TraRlic F.n8ineers 61 Transportation Planners D91Ot5 o JUL 2 9 1997 ,Y:►�"4'Jxr : 4gP�2% L'. uYI+ 7?. t' ::'�„:4ii? "2u'a.f.:Y.�:4.'3fK�^ MDR. wi* x.rtnVx'+cxrr..:2R�:"y:.n�1:�?M. �.`•i`r'b,'4�.'.i; =;;i Traffic Impact Analysis for the Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila, Washington TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Purpose 1 Existing Road Network 4 Existing Traffic 4 Population and Traffic Growth 4 Trip. Generation 5 Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment 5 Adjacent Land Uses 9 Levels of Service Description 9 Level of Service Analysis 11 Discussion 11 Mitigation Proportionate Fairshare 12 Conclusions 13 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1, Vicinity Map 2 . Figure 2, Site Plan . 3 Figure 3, Current Traffic Volumes 6 Figure 4, Future Traffic Volumes Without, Project 7 Figure 5, Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment 8 Figure 6, Future Traffic Volumes With Project 10 LIST OF TABLES Table I, Trip Generation 5 Table II, Level of Service Criteria 9 Table III, Results of Level of Service Analysis 11 Table IV, Mitigation Proportionate Fairshare Costs 12 Table V, Developer Proportionate Share Contribution 13 RECEIVED JUL 2 4 1997 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS Christopher Brown g Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., quite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 : "ilr%C"•rr:ii , '•'Qr'::'' t• �' "^• v "�i'af f,1�Q',R."i:`. 7 t��iE n'51njvt r1? J" Y. l.. Ox: �Y 'SFL�Y!GFt.riAW:F0H17:ht4ry - .+. .... - -. . s:•�` - . Y.rs Traffic Impact Analysis for the Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila. Washington Introduction The proposed Outback Steakhouse is a "high- quality, sit down" restaurant and will be located on the east side of Southcenter Parkway approximately 500 feet south of Strander Boulevard in front of the Double Tree Suites hotel. It will have seating for 238 patrons and its hours of operation will be limited to the evenings only. Since such a facility may increase vehicular traffic demands and potentially affect operations of adjacent roads during the p.m. peak hour, it is appropriate to review current and future traffic operations, identify potential impacts, and identify any appropriate mitigation measures. The location of the Outback Steakhouse relative its surroundings is shown in Figure 1, Vicinity Map on the following page. Purpose The purpose of this traffic impact analysis is to: o describe the road system serving the proposed development and assemble a database of current traffic operations; o identify an horizon year by which the proposed Outback Steakhouse development could be constructed and generating traffic; o develop an appropriate population growth rate for the surrounding area and estimate traffic volumes that might reasonably exist in the horizon year; o determine the trip generation rates or the amount of traffic likely to be produced by the development; o identify the primary directions of travel within the subject area and, based on this, assign site generated traffic to the surrounding road network; o compare current traffic operations with what is expected to exist in the future both with and without the proposed development; o identify any roadway capacity or other deficiencies that given construction of the proposed development would necessitate subsequent modification or improvement; o identify roadway improvements currently planned in the vicinity of the project; o determine appropriate mitigation measures to safely accommodate additional site generated traffic and compute fair share mitigation costs. RECEIVED JUL 2 41997 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS Christopher brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton. WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 168TH 2ND 5TH S 179TH Jeci,ip ST 1111ST ST. 4 , ..: „-,.. V - — .1 al xi Figure 1, Vicinity Map 2 J JVIgi .51 N 15_2t10 ST 1 I . ' S 153 -9. • - I Z 711 Ln 1?111) PI 1146 :D. -„c s sr. 1111 111 VINIL TUKWILA 4 . ST < I CRYSTAL' ‘11,14*"'-ipm P Kw Y CH x; • ST s Now N. SPRINGS PARK 4: 0 4 , r fi. SOUTHCENTER A S 168Th LN S 172ND PL 700 ST S 167TH ST ST tr ST ST ST 17 +1 111 -.1 • S s. - ST 19 4 S 1681N 178TH ST Sswm ;172TH ST 1 5100 t ..n sant BOW r 7 TH sr , . .. , < • LAKE 4300 PK 178TH i Lis 7 9. • STRANDER CORPORATE — OR N CORPORA MINKLER DR S PARKWA t i MID LAN D DR PLt TR RANO .. • • EVANS 8LACK _R _ BL BLVD A CHNISIENS GRIME! I • ■LLCS110 At 510 Mt 01 L7' AICLAU AL A . Cil kg cc 4 TRECK INDo •'-. . CI SOUTHCENTER PLAT = . DR = 26 / ..< rr1 By C iii . i CI —1 (// Z r rl ---( _ 70 zz PARA el- FS ce ••.t a. BLVD OR lottfiivsiv pen gla S .taisT ST R ". ESTVIEW 1 5 61si .S \; 9114-n-r • st • PARK 7 S ST al ST t. S 163RD PC • ST -1i T 77: _ a c ut 0. 2 " = I 164111 ST 99 ST < -5-1.661N ST/ sterti) • PAVILION PALL 5600 S 180TH! 1 1 FUG ciI) 3 \ • ...now* Christopher Brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A-201 Renton. WA 98055-1380 (206) 772-1188 • z 2 LL/ 6 = —1 - 0 (/) W , W --I 1.- CO !J- ut 0 1 g u. (,) — 11 Z t.- I— 0 Z I— LL! tu 2 0 ILI u j: 0 r U- Z: 0 92: 0 z ulvorssi • 046rd PLAIN) • TO DC INDD cduers rum= vt‘serArice■ TO De RO.2,11D n.• .0 / "mu C • M4N MAO.. R T0'1\ , or ..1 5OUTHGENTER PARKWAY DOUBLETREE UEST SUITES vusre KrOPIANT NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. [MST'S KrOLVIT 3^ -•• MAW. 14ft WOK.. " 1 Existing Road Network The road system serving the proposed Outback Steakhouse primarily includes Southcenter Parkway, Strander Boulevard, Klickitat Drive, and the freeway ramps. Other roads that may carry some site generated traffic include Minkler Boulevard and South 180th Street. Key elements of the roadway network are described as follows: O Southcenter Parkway is a five -lane arterial with a center, two -way, left -turn lane and numerous curb -cuts along its length. It has a posted speed limit of 35 mph is illuminated and has curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. Traffic signals and protected left -turn channelization exist at South 180th Street, the 17500 block, the 16700 block, Minkler Boulevard, Strander Boulevard, and at the I -5 on and off ramps. O Strander Boulevard is a five -lane arterial with a center, two -way, left -turn lane along most of its length. Left -turn channelization exists at intersections and major access drives. Traffic signals and protected left -turn channelization exist at the East Valley Highway (SR -181), Andover Park East, Andover Park West, the south access drive to South Center Mall, and Southcenter Parkway. It has a posted speed limit of 35 mph, is illuminated and has curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. o Minkler Boulevard is a lightly traveled two -lane collector with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. It is illuminated, with curbs and gutters, and sidewalks in places: posted speed limit of 35 mph is illuminated and has curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. Traffic signals and protected left -turn channelization exist at Southcenter Parkway, Andover Park West, and Andover Park East. t^ i s 3 a;6 yic i;;4 ss . ,. ?+y iv, EU ?watt 14;Wi.',!i i: i��d u':� ni2iwYi Existing Traffic Current turning movement data for this study was obtained in April of 1997 in clear, dry weather conditions. No adverse weather or other conditions existed that might skew the data. These data are shown in both the level of service computations included in the appendix to this report as well as Figure 3, Current Traffic Volumes on page 6. Population and Traffic Growth Historic traffic volume data was analyzed to identify an historic growth rate in vehicular travel demand. Once determined, this rate was extrapolated to a future horizon year and uniformly applied to existing traffic volumes to estimate expected future volumes. In this study, the horizon year was taken to be the year 2010 since the Outback Steakhouse can reasonably be expected to be constructed, occupied, and generating traffic by this time. Historic traffic volume data made available by Tukwila Department of Public Works staff has been collected and compiled from 12 "control count" stations located throughout the City of Tukwila. Between 1986 and 1996 the annual rate of growth in traffic volumes was 1.5 percent. Taken from the present to the year 2010 this amounts to a compounded overall growth rate of 21.4 percent. Christopher Brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. Suite A -201 Renton. WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 . . - uvsruy+wow Year 2010 traffic volumes, shown in Figure 4, Future Traffic Volumes Without Project, were estimated by applying the growth rate to those volumes shown in Figure 3, Current Traffic Volumes. Trip Generation The proposed Outback Steakhouse is a quality restaurant with a turnover rate likely to exceed at least one hour or longer. It will operate only between the hours 4:00 p.m. and midnight. The 5th edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual refers to this kind of facility as a Quality Restaurant and has published trip generation data under land use code. (LUC) 831. The trip generation characteristics for the proposed development are given below. Table I, Trip Generation Time Period Traffic Volumes A.W.D.T. 610 A.M. Inbound N/A A.M. Outbound N/A Noon Inbound N/A Noon Outbound N/A P.M. Inbound 34 vehicles per hour P.M. Outbound 14 vehicles per hour Note that land use code 831 contains no data on morning or noon -time trip generation. Morning and noon -time trip generation estimates are therefore not included. Their impacts are insignificant and have no effect on subsequent level of service analyses. Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment Given the generally north -south orientation of traffic in the area near the proposed development, the trip distribution is based on the north -south distribution of traffic at the most proximate major intersection, Southcenter Parkway and Strander Boulevard. Site generated traffic was assigned to the surrounding road network using the analogy method. That is, the assignment was based on current turning movement counts at intersections through which 10 or more site generated trips will likely pass. A description of the analogy method is given on pages 54 and 55 of the ITE publication Transportation and Land Development, by Vergil Stover and Frank Koepke. The trip distribution and traffic assignment for the Outback Steakhouse is shown on pages 8 of this report. Christopher Brown I1 Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. Suite A -201 Renton. WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 z i-i • • �w J U ' oo coo' • (Dui "tux: w O. 2 u. Ca CS z �: I- o, Z af : 2 U u i 0 0 I- w I -- 0 L - 1 - 1 O z o o ~. ti Kllck!tat Drive 205 Figure 3, Current Traffic Volume • 0 - Off Ramp, Mall Entrance Strander Boulevard MInkler Boulevard South 1180th Street IN1 NOT TO SCALE Christopher Brown a Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 rs rb.u;a�k +S'," ? yt� tii:i tiFrk � ' ir? ik <s 34e a'z� , 4.2 1 , , liAk"i ;i z w J U U N W;. • W =� W 0' 2 g J . • IL Q s d .1-.W Z �. 1-.0. • p •U . N . :W W� H -` Z• • tll N . z r.�l'. ' "�%73.:.1i�^., ..,•a. ... .; iTiA�rfi: 1d''. wir.{ iN. ud;. C: sri. L�iY," aS; �' i' y! b' �S: h'. �. ittihC" dX74fi; K�iiG:. x" i7A4: 3� 4. i4: w`+`.' Ea` 110,`% x�fitr:+,+ 7�' i, % `�$rax.u-GMnY',ii','✓.:l06 klIckltat Drive 249 E a 3 O V) e • u t 3 0 a 0 -3 Off Ramp. Mall Entrance Strand•r Boulevard Mlnkl•r Boulevard South 130th Str••t Figure 4, Future Traffic Volumes Without Project NOT TO SCALE Christopher Brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 : I-Z: • w. W J U; .0 0; co U. v) w N w 0 1 u- Q w, . . _. z 1-: . 0 co l , ui = U; LLD' W Z, 'U —. H �? z CCIIckltct Drive 5 —141 to I L.' r A d G d Figure 5, Trip. Distribution and grz4 50A I -3 Off Romp, Moll Entrance n flic Assignment Stronder Boulevard L 2 Afilo cl.r Boulevard South 980th Street fl NOT TO SCALE Christopher Brown g Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton. WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 ....- ,_..�:::f�. .. �r�4�": 1J.rs'r,'i tit: 9; a.. nu�I: u�': ?wd: 1' viS. tii�t� :dfYs�:Y2�'d.E.`.�i"•'ui.i4i riw";w33:fifLSi:S- tiil'�",�tCd, s�29'F;eFil v zar,:. �i N' :.�4�a+•.�Ii'. 'JQ. +)KA'..v w s;:. iii�USt�+ = H • • „ w: •- U ; • U O; :C0 W' • W =: CO LL: ui •O I • I I z itu • gy C73 ; ;0 . 011 W lll O Adjacent Land Uses Apart from the Double Tree Suites hotel, land uses in the immediate vicinity of the Outback Steakhouse are primarily retail. There are also a variety of restaurants, a professional office building, gas station, a major distribution center, and a city park to the east. The proposed Outback Steakhouse is will not introduce any new divergent land uses or land use conflicts. It is a compatible land use. Table II, Level of Service Criteria iil,;(yi� ^' ii:: t�l1:' :. :;tK> ".��1:: +(��wri+t.4S +.ry e�i; .1%SC:GM . i n+ . �/M1.Hwwl..row.www Levels of Service Description Level of service (LOS) describes the quality of traffic flow. Level of service ranges from LOS "A" to LOS "F." LOS "A" reflects ideal driving conditions where one can select speed and change lanes at will and expect delays of less than 5 seconds. LOS "F" represents severely constrained operations characterized by excessive delays. Level of service as a function of delay is shown in Table II. Table II, Level of Service Criteria sets forth the standards by which levels of service are determined. This, along with a detailed discussion on how levels of service are computed is contained in the Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209 published by the Transportation Research Board. Signalized Levels of Service Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A 555.0 B >5.0 and 515.0 C >15.0 and 525.0 D >25.0 and 5_40.0 E >40.0 and 5.60.0 F >60.0 Unsignalized Level of Service Delay per Vehicle (Seconds) A 5 B >5.0 and 5.10.0 C >10.0 and 5.20.0 D >20.0 and 5_30.0 E >30.0 and 5A5.0 F >45.0 There are several PC based software packages available to compute levels of service. Two programs, the Highway Capacity Software (HCS) and Signal -94, were used in this report. They were developed by the McTrans Center at the University of Florida and Strong Concepts, respectively and are used under license to Christopher Brown & Associates. Outputs from these software packages are included in the appendix of this report. In order to determining the level of service of signalized intersections, one must first have signal timing and phasing information. Signal -94 however, contains a routine by which optimum signal timing and phasing information is computed. Since optimal settings may Christopher Brown g Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. Suite A -201 Renton, WA 980554380 (206) 772 -1188 z a = - Z � 6 -J C.) 0 { co W= J w 0 g -J a w _. Z �. Z o ` o ( w w '. .z 0 O ~ z ti M1 218 a . ft 3 y � Y O Z h i • c • V Z 3 O U) Figure 6, Future Traffic Volumes With Project 1 -5 Off Ramp, Mail Entrance Strander Boulevard Minkler Boulevard South 9eoth Street INI NOT TO SCALE r,.. ; t.r ..+.. :x.. �: .�, ,• . , ;�� . +: �a.,.� eye+++:'p� fart =�, i a ; t .. .•.f .. .� .. ��a .� r.�.:�Nsr5 °;� ..:sr�w,t.ry�:.�.ttf�c;.::s•�; ::, �. r�' �.:i':;.;•c�r� ..�s`vuc.rS`,7? .ri�a,`:�s.:t.�ie:�iaHa:c ��'ln >ttr;kdai ? Christopher Brown Associates 879 12ainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Penton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 N C: J C)� • 0O CO !co uk LL • w0',. .¢ —J! u_ a: •f- 0; • ZF wu. W W ', • • Z'. l li 0 • Table III, Results of Level of Service Analysis 11 Signalized Intersections Current 1997 on Southcenter Parkway Conditions @ Minkler Boulevard a Strander Boulevard a Klickitat Drive @ I -5 Off Ramp at Mall Entrance not be in effect in actual practice, there may be some difference between actual and computed settings. Such difference however, are typically minor. This notwithstanding, the same signal phasing and timing settings are used in all three of the "Current," "Future Without Project," and "Future With Project" scenarios and thus provide a common basis for comparison. Level of Service Analysis As shown in the table below, neither background growth nor the development itself are expected to degrade operations of the adjacent road network to unacceptable levels through the year 2010. While this is primarily due to the adequacy of the existing road network it should be noted that there is a significant difference between the peak period of operation of the road system and the Outback Steakhouse. While the former tends to be between 3:15 and 4:15, the latter tends to occur much later in the evening when there is an abundant supply of reserve capacity. Accordingly, only the p.m. peak hour is included in this analysis and those intersections through which fewer than 10 site generated trips would pass have been excluded. Year 2010 w/o Project LOS Delay LOS Delay B 8 B 15 B 9 B 18 C 20 E 55 B 8 B 15 Year 2010 w/ Project LOS Delay B 15 B . 18 E 56 N/A The table above shows that only the intersection at Klickitat Drive will experience any significant reduction in level of service due to the addition of background growth traffic. Notwithstanding, this reduction is from LOS "C" to LOS "E" and, according to City of Tukwila standards, LOS "E" is an acceptable level of service. It should also be noted that this degradation takes place over a 13 year period and that the Outback Steakhouse will have been constructed and in full operation long before the year 2010. In summary, no adverse traffic flow consequences can be associated with full implementation of the Outback Steakhouse. Increases in vehicular traffic will be minimal and the road system as it currently exists is well able to handle the minor, additional traffic. Discussion With the addition of site generated traffic and with no changes in geometry or traffic controls, adequate levels of service and safe traffic operations will continue beyond the year 2010 at all impacted intersections. No need exists to change current roadway geometry or traffic controls. Christopher Brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Renton, WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 z � re w J U U CO 0 �n w w = u_ w u. ift �w . Z Z �. 1— 0 Z I 11J uj, O U .. 0 I— • w F- ■ i60 ui z ' = . 0 z ^ ,a 1 2.:4\ a' . X...ea, , +l'nlPM.Ci. �.y ilki iri x- r«,.K -�.�.. . s":. c�7.^. b33f. E1�! uiZ" n£,' e". �Sr /aSi.t��a.kA�'c'Jni�•'5�. 7V�, c�ri3ilUnrat?6�sa` "410-01e63>'r$. At the project site access to Southcenter Parkway, good levels of service and excellent entering sight distances exist suggesting that no remedial measures are necessary through the year 2010. As currently proposed and with future forecast traffic conditions and roadway geometry, the access will operate very well. It may be discerned that the reason there will be no traffic impacts is that the peak hour of the site does not coincide with that of the arterial and freeway systems. These tend to be in the 3:15 to 4:15 interval, essentially before the opening time of the restaurant. Indeed, for this reason no reduction in traffic for "pass -by" trips has been used, rather all site traffic is considered to be associated with "primary" or destination trips. Mitigation Proportionate Fairshare The City of Tukwila has a number of transportation improvements programmed for the next six years that are partially funded by developer contributions or mitigation proportianate fairshare costs. The following is a list of these projects as provided by Ms. Joanna Spencer. Table IV, Mitigation Proportionate Fairshare Costs Intersection or Link Year 1990 Year 2010 Difference Improvement Cost/Trip Volume Volume Cost Southcenter /Strander 3,899 4,853 954 $ 134,000 $ 140 - widen for WB left turns Andover Park E /Strander 3,211 3,905 694 $ 94,000 $ 135 - widen for n/s left turns Andover Park W /Strander 3,082 4,016 934 $ 296,000 $ 317 widen for n/s left turns S 180th St. /5R181 5,236 7,760 2,524 $ 1,200,000 $ 475 widen n/s and e/w Andover Park EBaker 790 1,453 663 $ 250,000 $ 377 - n/s lefts, signal Andover Park W/Minkler 2,441 3,078 637 $ 250,000 $ 392 n/s lefts, signal Southcenter Parkway /168 2,425 3,327 902 $ 150,000 $ 166 - signal W Valley /Strander 3,433 4,316 883 $ 250,000 $ 283 NB dual left turns lanes Interurban Bridge 2,831 3,945 1,114 $ 1,250,000 $ 1,122 - widen for dual lefts Southcenter Parkway/Minkler 2,666 3,573 907 $ 123,900 $ 137 12 h;eso 10i44 +.5K2 Christopher Brown ( Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N.. Suite A -201 Renton. WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 A comparison between Figure 5, Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment and Table IV, Mitigation Proportionate Fairshare Costs shows how access to the Outback Steakhouse could be enhanced by improvements programmed by the City of Tukwila. From this, it is apparent that only those improvements at Southcenter Parkway /Strander Boulevard and Southcenter Parkway/Minkler Boulervard pertain. Fairshare mitigation costs are therefore appropriatly computed as follows: Table V, Developer Proportionate Share Contribution Project Cost per Trip Number of Trips Fairshare Cost Southcenter /Strander $ 140 4 $ 560 - widen for WB left turns Southcenter Parkway/Minkler $ 137 3 $ 411 Conclusions The following conclusions may be drawn. 1. The project will generate some 610 vehicular trips per day with 48 of these in the evening peak hour. 2. Including this project with background traffic growth does not appear to alter arterial levels of service during the morning, noon, or evening peak hours. 3 On the strength of the trip generation data included herein, the analogy method based distribution adds little traffic to key area intersections. 4. No intersection through which 10 or more site generated trips pass will experience any reduction in level of service as a direct result of site generated traffic. Adequate levels of service will remain through the horizon year of 2010. 5 Existing roadway and associated traffic controls are adequate to accommodate potential future site related traffic with no need for modification or revision. 6. Given continued adequate operations, no mitigation measures are needed as a direct result of the Outback Steakhouse. It may be appropriate however, to contribute, on a proportionate fairshare basis, to proprammed future improvements. 7. Finally, there is a significant difference between the peak hours of operation of the adjacent street system and the Outback Steakhouse. The former tends to be in the 3:15 to 4:15 interval while the latter occurs much later in the evening. Adequate reserve capacity will therefore remain available to Outback patrons well beyond the horizon year of 2010 and there will be no need for infrastructure improvements as a direct result of the Outback Steakhouse. :b$'M'.Xf'+21Ci 13 Recommended Total Developer Contribution = $ 971 Christopher Brown Associates 879 Rainier Avenue N., Suite A -201 Penton. WA 98055 -1380 (206) 772 -1188 z HZ W 6 U 0 No wz J i- W < . w z � I- o z I- w w U O. . w w` LL ..z w U N: '~ H: 0 z c 011 Traffic Impact Analysis for the Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila. Washington Appendix Capacity and Level of Service Computations along Southcenter Parkway Minkler Boulevard Current 1997 Conditions Future 2001 Conditions without Project Future 2001 Conditions with Project Strander Boulevard Current 1997 Conditions Future 2001 Conditions without Project Future 2001 Conditions with Project Klickitat Drive • Current 1997 Conditions Future 200 Conditions without Project Future 2001 Conditions with Project 1-5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance Current 1997 Conditions • Future 2001 Conditions without Project @ Site Access / On Site Queuing 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 45 50 ; Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. •j Sq 21 * * / ** / \ • North { 0 .0 0 36 .0 0 Phase 1 + • *> v G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% .0 0 0 12.0 1 -- 615 48 24.0 12.0 2 1 Phase 2 + V 1 G /C= . 41 0 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% \ 0 .0 0 648 24.0 2 18 .0 0 04/24/97 09:29:35 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES \ 90 .0 0 / \ 0 12.0 1 / 55 .0 0 North Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .66 .50 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E . .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .70 .90 .65 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .66 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W. .0 . 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Phase 3 Phase 4 + + ++ V G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= 000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 01 1 z JU 00 .0 w • J N LL, w o J. LL= U-2 X au •Z .1- O' ILI Ili O .0 F-' W• O . w N. O ~ z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph 04/24/97 09:29:35 Z Z F - ` I Z Jo 0 0. N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 , CO O N -TH. 615 .66 932 TH 932 2 1.05 979 . 00 .00 ' w Ws N -LT 48 .50 96 LT 96 1 1.00 96 1.00 .00 : - i u) u. E -RT 90 .70 129 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 w O. E -TH 0 .90 0 LT +TH +RT 214 1 1.00 214 .40 .60 2 E -,LT 55 .65 85 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 g 5 S -RT 18 .64 28 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 Z S -TH 648 .66 982 TH +RT 1010 2 1.05 1060 .00 .03 Z S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -RT 36 .64 56 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 aluj W -TH 0 .90 0 TH +RT 56 1 1.00 56 .00 1.00 2a. W - LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 0 o, ,O N O I- W W' SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet �F= - O, Z ; Ap, Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj Li d u i pr, .Group Ideal. of Sat- v =, . ch' Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow p H - -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn. Turn Fact vphg 'Z . N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 E- LT +TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .819 .890 1.00 1357 S- TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .996 1.000 1.00 3710 TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .765 1.000 1.00 1425 U7:�"'.i. i�'X�fv''R.J'aw". "c `tea .`fi4C3�1 h"iii:sda`L3J[rff.c:2� L'�i4CR :1fYy 'at %iG S. ii .MtiS'yrif.�?bSiirtSl. +c�jwt":i ?,r: :•=h ` 144. Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Approach Input /Calculation N -LT E -LT S -LT C - Cycle Length G - Actual Green Time g - Effective Green Time go - Opp. Effective Green Time N - Number of Lanes No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate PLT - Proportion of LT PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate tL - Lost Time LTC - Left Turns per Cycle Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio gf - First LT Effect. Green qro - Opposing Queue Ratio gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green fs - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) PL - Proportion of LT (9 -17) n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) EL1'- TH Equivalent for LT EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) fmin - Minimum Value for fLT fm - LT Factor for LT (9 -17) fLT -.LT Factor for Lane Group . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 60.0000 15.8802 16.8802 16.8802 1.0000 1.0000 85.0000 . 3972 . 0000 56.0000 3.0000 1.4167 . 9333 1.0000 2.4435 . 7187 .3032 14.4367 . 8400 . 3972 . 0000 1.0000 1.3720 .0000 . 1655 .8899 .8899 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- vph vphg vph N- TH 979 3725 .263 .619 2305 .425 N- LT Pri. 96 1770 .054 .142 251 .382 E- LT +TH +RT 214 1357 .158 .281 382 .560 S- TH +RT 1060 3710 .286 .427 1584 .669 W- TH +RT Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec 56 1425 .039 .281 401 .140 Sum(v /s) = .498 Xc = .585 04/24/97 09:29:36 W -LT . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 03 .. ,. L�:G., ,u; i .-: �xkrr ••,t'�t:t`'N.:;s' >Eti�u,i�.Y, 'G:::bi..'' a�3i.:: i�iiitfltr'zf:;:+r :yl`..:iSSi3t : U' tiv3� &,",1h.}7i%i3.3:i ": kil it;* „ W'l IfL13,d t '_ Ap pr ch N- N- Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Lane Group Mvts Vol Ratio v/c TH .425 LT .382 E- LT +TH +RT .560 S- TH +RT .669 W- TH +RT .140 Cycle= 60" Int Total .536 Green Unif Delay Ratio Delay Fact g/C dl DF -- sec /v . 619 4.5 .85 . 142 17.8 .85 . 281 14.0 .85 . 427 10.5 .85 . 281 12.3 .85 Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph Incr Lane Delay Group d2 Delay sec /v sec /v 04/24/97 09:29:36 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - 2305 16 .08 3.9 A 251 16 .49 15.6 C+ > 4.9 382 16 1.41 13.3 B > 13.3 1584 16 .78 9.7 B+ > 9.7 B+ 401 16 .01 10.4 .B > 10.4 B > 7.9 B+ 0 4 C Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 21 I Phase 1 * * / ** / North C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s/v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS t Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh 1 Max Que: ft G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 0 979 96 0/0 24/2 12/1 0 28 8 0 62 14 0 2305 251 A C+ .00 .43 .38 .0 6.4 25.7 0 26 10 0 127 22 Phase 2 Phase 3 +. V G /C= .410 G =. 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% N Approach RT TH LT 0 12 3 0 157 69 N Approach 1075 A .42 8.1 36 149 + + ++ V G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0 OFF =66.9% E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 129 0 85 29 1031 0 56 0 0 2405 0/0 12/1 0/0 0/0 24/2 0/0 0/0 12/1 0/0 0 20 0 0 30 0 0 6 0 0 28 0 0 43 0 0 28 0 0 382 0 0 1584 0 0 401 0 4923 B B+ B B+ .00 .56 .00 .00 .67 .00 .00 .14 .00 .54 .0 22.1 .0 .0 15.0 .0 .0 16.8 .0 12.6 0 20 0 0 66 0 0 4 0 126 0 46 0 0 213 0 0 10 0 418 0 5 0 130 E Approach . S Approach 21 4 B .56 22.1 20 46 0 0 20 0 0 256 1060 B+ .67 15.0 66 213 04/24/97 09:29:37 0 0 1 0 41 0 0 34 0 256 Int W Approach Total 56 2405 B B+ .14 .54 16.8 12.6 4 126 10 418 15 5 20 1 41 157 130 256 34 256 a r ii ls T:ii"3:u.selxi%iT" ii z QQ � W 60 0 0 N O W J LL w -73 �d . H _ ; z I- Z F- ' O - 0 t- W UJ X U; F. LI z U� Z' O ~` z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions w/o Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Sq 21 * * / ** North 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 12.0 1 -- 44 .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type - $ RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .66 .50 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .70 .90 .65 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S' .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .66 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Phase 1 Phase 2 G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 746 24.0 2 v G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% 58 12.0 1 \ 0 .0 0 + + ++ V 786 24.0 2 G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% \ 109 .0 0 0 12.0 1 / 67 .0 0 22 .0 0 07/18/97 12:46:21 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES / North Phasing: SEQUENCE 21. PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Phase 3 Phase 4 I Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 000 � cvsv a8�,' rs'.[ axx°.:•% Fii�, �,�r.�iiN'wF.e*5�C 1a §C�i�ib ? «s `�^'s`'i ;':: �•`'.' F; ik; S!: t�°•. i( i�' tS�`. s: i+ 2�i: it�rriii��'i.':.�;i+i�- `F,i»fi?: vd4x44 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions w/o Project (Th ti p 07/18/97 12:46 :21 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT z vph -- vph -- vph vph a H z N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 w N -TH 746 .66 1130 TH 1130 2 1.05 1186 .00 .00 tO g; : N -LT 58 .50 1 1 6 LT 1 1 6 1 1 . 0 0 1 1 6 1.00 .00 00 i co p: E -RT 109 .70 156 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 .w w E -TH 0 .90 0 LT +TH +RT 259 1 1 .00 259 .40 .60 . . i- E -LT 67 .65 103 0 0 1 . 00 0 .00 .00 N w' w O S -RT 22 .64 34 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 2 -' ? . S -TH 786 .66 1191 TH +RT 1225 2 1.05 1286 .00 .03 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N W--RT . 44 .64 69 0 0 1 .00 0 . 00 .00 _ . W. -TH 0 .90 0 TH +RT 69 1 1 .00 69 . 00 1 .00 z F- W -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 t- O; z t- w w, V SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet g 9. = w W Z UN T. 1900 2. 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .1.000 1.00 3725 p ~ - LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 z ' Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- - pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact, vphg E- LT +TH +RT 1900 1 .1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .819 .865 1.00 1319 S -. TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .996 1.000 1.00 3710 W- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .765 1.000 1.00 1425 0007 ♦ 1.. ; +4r �n�. tf..rl3:MA4ViS.'Si ��+� _;;.>. � ��.: Gtr'��'arria��as.U>:.:.aaL:'Y,: - v, ��x> rraz�iaiva� ..:,:r�e,!3:�1ti�.�U:,.,,;,�` .5� �.x'r, ax✓kh,�w.,11�b`.i ���i�f�:. ?�!5.'! ?.±aY:Stiy�`.s, ivit� �Y:ii+y7^ki+�i {er'; S Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions w/o Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Approach Input /Calculation N -LT E -LT S -LT C - Cycle Length .0000 60.0000 .0000 G - Actual Green Time .0000 15.8800 .0000 g - Effective Green Time .0000 16.8800 .0000 go - Opp. Effective Green Time .0000 16.8800 .0000 N - Number of Lanes .0000 1.0000 .0000 No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) .0000 1.0000 .0000 vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate .0000 103.0000 .0000 PLT - Proportion of LT .0000 .3977 .0000 PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) .0000 .0000 .0000 vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate .0000 69.0000 .0000 tL Lost Time .0000 3.0000 .0000 LTC - Left Turns per Cycle Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio } gf - First LT Effect. Green qro - Opposing Queue Ratio gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green fs - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) PL - Proportion of LT (9 -17) n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) EL1 - TH Equivalent for LT EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) fmin - Minimum Value for fLT fm - LT Factor for LT (9 -17) fLT - LT Factor for Lane Group E- LT +TH +RT W- TH +RT Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 1.7167 1 .1500 1.0000 1.7442 . 7187 . 8727 15.1358 . 8319 . 3977 . 0000 1.0000 1.4467 . 0000 .1656 . 8647 . 8647 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch. Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- vph vphg vph - N- TH 1186 3725 .318 .619 2305 .515 N- LT Pri. 116 1770 .066 .142 251 .462 259 1319 .196 .281 371 .698 S- TH +RT 1286 3710 .347 .427 1584 .812 69 1425 .048 .281 401 .172 Sum(v /s) = .609 Xc = .716 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 07/18/97 12:46:21 W -LT . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 000 ° ,4/ •'CRi7,:a:2 .I: r6,; s;:±+J;3• C } Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions w/o Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 Ap pr ch E- LT +TH +RT .698 Lane Group Mvts Vol Ratio v/c TH .515 LT .462 TH +RT .812 TH +RT .172 Cycle= .60" Int:Total .652 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Green Ratio g/C Unif Delay Delay Fact d1 DF sec /v . 619 •4.9 . 142 18.0 . 281 14.7 . 427 11.5 . 281 12.4 Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph Incr Delay d2 sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v Lan Grp LOS Appr Delay sec /v 07/18/97 12:46:22 Appr LOS . 85 2305 16 .17 4.3 A .85 251 16 .99 16.3 C+ > 5.4 B+ . 85 371 16 3.90 16.4 C+ > 16.4 C+ . 85 1584 16 2.36 12.1 B > 12.1 B . 85 401 16 .02 10.5 B > 10.5 B > 9.4 B + 0009 ..... i,44:,. i.t"i ..:... r<L':..`q -a•.. y1Mt W Ait n �i tY 7 t a�1 " LJ.;^». �: srr� i;; Y�nS: t� w .• SR: � u t G�«: �i i r �' i �:• �1 .•• 4 L 3 r n�• ii> e r ;- • . ' + L' ,. �'€ 4� 1 2 A . s :: s � ttleN` i!' r a1. !wi Z, • W. Jo o O: t N ; ._. • w =:. J _ W O. H W. Z °` o uy • o F.. . :u. W N. Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions w/o Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 21 i Phase 1 * * / ** /•\ North MVMT TOTALS Param•Units AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 0 1186 0/0 24/2 0 33 0 62 0 2305 Phase 2 Phase 3 G /C= . 41 0 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.20 C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% N Approach RT TH LT A C+ .00 .51 .46 .0 7.0 26.7 0 35 13 0 166 27 0 15 3 0 191 84 N Approach 1302 B+ .51 8.8 48 193 v 116 12/1 9 14 251 + + ++ v G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 156 0 0/0 12/1 0 24 0 28 0 371 C+ .00 .70 .0 26.2 0 28 0 58 0 6 0 157 E Approach 259 C+ .70 26.2 28 58 103 36 1250 0/0 0/0 24/2 0 0 36 0 0 43 0 0 1 584 B .00 .00 .81. .0 .0 17.8 0 0 96 0 0 282 0 0 25 0 0 .311 S Approach 1286 B .81 17.8 96 282 0/0 0 0 69 0/0 0 0 0 12/1 8 28 401 B 00 .00 .17 .00 .0 .0 17.1 .0 0 0 5 0 0 0 13 0 07/18/97 12:46:22 0 / 0 0 2916 0 0 0 4912 B+ .65 14.5 177 546 0 0 2 0 51 0 0 42 0 311 Int W Approach Total 69 2916 B B+ .17 .65 17.1 14.5 5 177 13 546 18 6 25 2 51 191 157 311 42 311 O fH r it,s1.:67iciab :y 3w:4M 6 's l:;y =c,35 ; $4. Ma kx.L a SerrrA ;. t r 3 r r Ku r xa x+F 10;:&44:: Z f W , U 0 c C `. W I w w o: L Q N d = w 1- _ Z F- 0. Z i- w U '0 0 E-. w w I iii Z 0 co, O ~ z } i Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Sq 21 * * / ** / \ . North .0 0 661 24.0 2 53 12.0 1 0 .0 0 / + 0 12.0 1 -- 38 .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% +, v G /C= .410 G= 24.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% \ 0 . 0 + + ++ v 722 24.0 2 G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% \ 100 .0 0 / 0 12.0 1 / 58 .0 0 North 19 .0 0 07/18/97 13:14:36 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type - % RT. TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .66 .50 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3_ E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .70 .90 .65 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S ... .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .64 .66 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W . .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO. 0 0 .64 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Phase 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 0011 z •Q w. J U. 00' t CO CI ' cn w : • w =. JI-i L w � Q ! = d: 1- _ I•- 1-0: Z I- 2 D. �. = 1110 .I- - O. 0.52' Hs; 0 1 '" z 3su16 -;,4 ftdi.,4 :, M * dtav41si i. r"AS s» vw xi$ 3. i 14sc it,144:4zi '3N, e4.91, stir..'t Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes [3til Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph N -RT 0 .90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 661 .66 1002 TH 1002 2 1.05 1052 .00 .00 N -LT 53 .50 106 LT 106 1 1.00 106 1.00 .00 E -RT 100 .70 143 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E-TH 0 .90 0 LT +TH +RT 232 1 1.00 232 .38 .62 E -LT 58 .65 89 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -RT 19 .64 30 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -TH 722 .66 1094 TH +RT 1124 2 1.05 1180 .00 .03 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -RT 38 .64 59 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -TH 0 .90 0 TH +RT 59 1 1.00 59 .00 1.00 W -LT. 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 07/18/97 13:14:36 1 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 E- LT +TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .817 .888 1.00 1350 S- TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .996 1.000 1.00 3711 W- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .765 1.000 1.00 1425 Z i-- w r4 2 O' U) I J f' w 0 J. ll. ' ; SI C7 Z �. � Z1- W U 0 1 - ' . W W . 0 Z Ill Z } Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Approach Input /Calculation N -LT E -LT S -LT C - Cycle Length G - Actual Green Time g - Effective Green Time go - Opp. Effective Green Time N - Number of Lanes No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate PLT - Proportion of LT PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate tL - Lost Time LTC - Left Turns per Cycle Volc - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio gf - First LT Effect. Green qro - Opposing Queue Ratio gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green fs - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) PL - Proportion of LT (9 -17) n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) EL1 - TH Equivalent for LT EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) fmin - Minimum Value for fLT fm - LT Factor for LT (9 -17) fLT - LT. Factor for Lane Group E- LT +TH +RT W- TH +RT Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 60.0000 15.8800 16.8800 16.8800 1.0000 1.0000 89.0000 .3836 . 0000 59.0000 3.0000 1.4833 . 9833 1.0000 2.2751 .7187 .4372 14.6049 .8381 . 3836 . 0000 1.0000 1 .3893 .0000 .1639 . 8876 . 8876 N- TH 1052 3725 .282 .619 2305 .456 N- LT Pri. 106 1770 .060 .142 251 .422 232 1350 .172 .281 380 .611 S- TH +RT 1180 3711 .318 .427 1584 .745 59 1425 .041 .281 401 .147 Sum(v /s) = .550 Xc = .647 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp vph vphg -- vph 07/18/97 13:14:37 W -LT .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 0013 z � r ,w -J 00 N vo w X J ~` wO . g - LLQ COD H = z�. I- 0 Z t- O 0 O g 0 1- ,w • w` U. F' O , • ill z F= • _ 0~ z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Ap pr ch N- N- E- LT +TH +RT .611 S- TH +RT .745 Lane Group Mvts Vol Ratio v/c TH .456 LT .422 Green Unif Delay Ratio Delay Fact g/C d1 DF -- sec /v TH +RT .147 .281 12.3 Cycle= 60" Int Total .591 Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph Incr Delay d2 sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v 07/18/97 13:14:37 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v . 619 4.6 .85 2305 16 .10 4.0 A . 142 17.9 .85 251 16 .70 15.9 C+ > 5.1 B+ . 281 14.2 .85 380 16 2.04 14.1 B > 14.1 B . 427 11.0 .85 1584 16 1.38 10.7 B > 10.7 B .85 401 16 .01 10.5 B > 10.5 B > 8.5 B+ 0014 Z' C4 W J 0 U0 CO 0 ; WI CO LL w 0 < = a , w , Z 0 ' Z ►- , U.1 Lu V 0 N O I- 2 z5 — 0. tii Z 0 V. Z c Sq 21 .I * * / ** / North Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Minkler Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance C= 60 MVMT TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft Phase 1 + *> V G /C= .125 G= 7.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% Phase 2 V G /C= .410 G= 24.6 " Y +R= 4.0" OFF =19.2% sec G= 48.0 sec N Approach RT TH LT 0/0 24/2 12/1 0 30 9 0 62 14 0 2305 251 A C+ .00 .46 .42 .0 6.6 26.2 0 29 12 0 140 24 0 13 3 0 169 77 N Approach 1158 B+ .45 8.4 41 164 Phase 3 + + ++ V G /C= .265 G= 15.9" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =66.9% = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% E Approach S Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT 143 0 0/0 12/1 0 21 0 28 0 380 B .00 .61 .0 23.2 0 22 0 50 0 6 0 141 E Approach 232 B .61 23.2 22 50 89 31 1149 0/0 0/0 24/2 0 0 33 0 0 43 0 0 1 584 B .00 .00 .75 .0 .0 16.2 0 0 80 0 0 248 0 0 23 0 0 0 285 0 S Approach 1180 B .75 16.2 80 248 07/18/97 13:14:37 Ped= .0 sec = .0% W Approach Int RT TH LT Total 0 59 0 0/0 0/0 12/1 0 0 7 0 0 28 0 0 401 B .00 .00 .15 .0 .0 16.9 0 0 4 0 0 11 0 2629 0/0 0 0 0 4921 B+ .00 .59 .0 13.4 0 147 0 473 0 1 0 46 0 36 0 285 Int W Approach Total 59 2629 B B+ .15 .59 16.9 13.4 4 147 11 473 16 6 23 1 46 169 141 285 36 285 0015 z Z . W U a Np. W =. W O 2 u- a w O ; z � tu U CI 1- Z U � : 1 O z • ■ Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - .0 0 0 .0 0 -- 0 .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 665 24.0 2 0 .0 0 / + / 279 24.0 2 Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N :0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .89 .90 .77 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .88 .88 .90 0- Y Y Y 3, 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Sq 21 * * / ** North Phase 1 Phase 2 + + + * * ** + +> v G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% v G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% 385 24.0 2 \ \ 0 .0 0 841 24.0 2 G/ C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% / 294 12.0 1 547 12.0 1 Q .0 0 04/24/97 09:45:05 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES / .\ North Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Phase 3 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 1V ` S! rt.;; C'=..; V'.. :..3':F`44./_'S:{��:= F' >+ij;% �:tii:S ate:. ., f .. ; y , . QU,�ifw�r'.did�•S ,Sw,.n;ticf� �3:. L" reYa'+' �a '3 AS�Y t�ti tta.r." i � 4 �sr x ;iY :rS: „�»;:.•��r%t�1;�aJ1.4::tdiu' :s .�:�.- 6� &a�'s..w''�.`•irr era:: iS�„ � iF# 15 {�Sl�L'r`d:+iriiiU z 1 J o O 0 N D cn w W I J al Q = d F = , Z �. H Z 1 ON D F- I H li • Z U- O ▪ F " S 1 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions 1 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph vph - -- vph N -RT 0 .90 0 N -TH 665 .88 756 TH N -LT 385 .93 414 LT E -RT 547 .89 E -TH 0 .90 E -LT 279 .77 S -RT 294 .88 S -TH 841 .88 S -LT 0 .90 N- TH N- LT E- RT E- LT S- RT S- TH 615 0 362 RT LT 0 756 414 334 RT 334 956 TH 956 0 0 0 2 2 615 1 0 0 362 2 1 2 0 1 .00 1 .05 1 .03 1 .00 1 .00 1.03 1 .00 1 .05 1.00 0 .00 .00 794 .00 .00 426 1.00 .00 615 .00 1.00 0 .00 .00 373 1.00 .00 334 .00 1.00 1004 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 04/24/97 09:45:06 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow - -. pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1 . 000 1.00 3725 .950 1.00 3539 . 000 1.00 1583 .950 1.00 3539 . 000 1.00 1583 . 000 1.00 3725 • C 1 N- TH N- LT E- RT E- LT S RT S- TH Ap Lane pr Group ch Mvts N- TH N- LT E- RT E- LT S- RT S- TH Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp vph vphg vph 794 3725 .213 Pri. 426 3539 .120 615 1583 .388 Pri. 373 3539 .105 334 1583 .211 1004 3725 .269 Vol Green Unif Delay Ratio Ratio Delay Fact v/c g/C d1 DF -- sec /v .317 .673 3.1 .85 .480 .251 14.5 .85 . 736 .528 8.3 .85 . 465 .227 15.2 .85 . 325 .649 3.6 .85 . 724 .372 12.3 .85 . 673 2508 .317 . 251 888 .480 . 528 . 227 803 .465 .649 1028 .325 . 372 Sum(v /s) _ .658 Xc = .731 Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph - 2508 16 888 16 836 16 803 16 1028 16 1387 16 836 .736 * 1 387 .724 04/24/97 09:45:06 Incr Lane Lan Delay Group Grp Appr Appr;. d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS' sec /v sec /v sec /v . 03 2.7 A . 33 12.7 B > 6.2 B+ 2.38 9.4 B+ . 32 11.3 B > 10.9 B . 07 3.1 A 1.33 11.8 B 9.6 B+ Cycle= 60" Int Total .541 > 8.8 B+ Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance North N Approach. E Approach Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT i MVMT TOTALS AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Delis /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Queveh Max. Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft Phase 1 + + + + * * ** + +> V G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% Phase 2 v G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% 0 794 426 615 0 373 334 1004 0 0 0 0 3546 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 24/2 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 23 14 42 .0 13 25 29 0 0 0 0 0 67 25 53 0 23 65 37 0 0 0 0 0 2508 888 836 0 803 1028 1387 0 0 0 0 7450 A B B+ .00 .32 .48 .74 .0 4.4 20.0 14.9 0 15 36 38 0 82 91 119 0 9 11 10 0 109 135 245 N Approach E Approach 1220 B+ .37 9.8 51 173 20 135 Phase 3 G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF=72.3% B A B .00 .47 .32 .72 .0 20.9 5.5 17.9 0 33 8 75 0 81 37 216 988 B .63 17.2 71 200 20 245 S Approach RT TH LT 0 10 4 21 0 122 99 266 S Approach 1338 B+ .62 14.8 83 253 25 266 04/24/97 09:45:07 Ped= .0 sec = .0% W Approach Int RT TH LT Total B+ .00 .00 .00 .00 .54 .0 .0 .0 .0 13.7 0 0 0 0 205 0 0 0 0 626 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 266 Int W Approach Total 0 3546 B+ .00 .54 .0 13.7 0 205 0 626 0 65 0 266 1i Z = H: tZ J U U CO 0 0 W W J W `, W 0 gQ D. d . 1- W Z1.- 1- 0. Z I- O �, W w H U w • Vi • z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. N`. S Sq 21' * * / ** North G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 0 .0 0 -- 0 .0. .0 .0 0 + + + + * * ** + +> v 807 24.0 2 0 .0 0 / + / 339 24.0 2 G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% 467 24.0 2 \ 0 . 0 1021 24.0 2 \ 664 12.0 1 357 12.0 1 0 .0 0 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES / North 07/18/97 12:51:42 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 . 0 . 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .89 .90 .77 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 . 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .88 .88 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 . 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .210 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= 12.6" G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= 4.0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF =72.3% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 0 02 0 v *.:aziu - .1te'd? meek tn`- N. is �dl/ 4w ir�a t:74c ii. ric;.` s%..,: ' ? til+�:i z re 2, 00. co o. cn w w =: CO IL, w 0 u - O a . H Z �.... I- 0 '. Z ILI D U O N; 0 E-.. w: U . � F- O. w z.. - O ~ z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph vph -- vph - vph N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 807 .88 917 TH 917 2 1.05 963 .00 .00 N -LT 467 .93 502 LT 502 2 1.03 517 1.00 .00 E -RT 664 .89 746 RT 746 1 1.00 746 .00 1.00 E -TH 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -LT 339 .77 440 LT 440 2 1.03 453 1.00 .00 S -RT 357 .88 406 RT 406 1 1.00 406 .00 1.00 S -TH 1021 .88 1160 TH 1160 2 1.05 1218 .00 .00 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 07/18/97 12:51 :42 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj { pr Group Ideal of Sat - ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow j -- pcphg . - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 E- RT, 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 E- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 S -. RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 S- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 0021 z I- z . w 2 U O" 0 . w = J N w: w O w ¢; ul Z Z I-0: z I- U CI; -; ww V! LL O, w ;V N : z c Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane pr Group ch Mvts N- TH N- LT E- E- S- RT S- TH Ap Lane pr Group ch Mvts LT Phase Type Adj Flow Rate vph Adj Satfl Rate vphg 963 3725 Pri. 517 3539 RT 746 1583 LT Pri. 453 3539 406 1 583 1 218 3725 Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet N- TH .384 N- LT .582 E- RT .892 E- LT .564 S- RT .395 S- TH .878 Cycle= 60" Int Total .656 Vol Green Unif Delay Ratio Ratio Delay Fact v/c g/C d1 DF -- sec /v .673 3.3 .85 . 251 15.0 .85 . 528 9.6 .85 . 227 15.6 .85 . 649 3.8 .85 . 372 13.4 .85 Flow Ratio v/s Green Ratio g/C V/C Ratio v/c .258 .673 2508 .384 . 146 .251 888 .582 . 471 .528 Lane Group Capac vph 836 .892 . 128 .227 803 .564 .256 .649 1028 .395 . 327 .372 Lane Group Capac vph Sum(v /s) = .798 Xc = .887 Cal Term m 2508 16 888 16 836 16 803 16 1028 16 1387 16 1 387 .878 Incr Delay d2 sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v Crit Lane Grp * > 11.5 07/18/97 12:51:42 Lan Grp Appr Appr LOS Delay LOS - sec /v - . 05 2.8 A .73 13.5 B > 6.6 8.49 16.7 C+ .70 14.0 B > 15.7 . 14 3.3 A 4.83 16.2 C+ > 13.0 B 0022 favetooytviamswerVIMMEMEMEM } Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 21 I Phase 1 * * / ** / North MVMT TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph. Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s/v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh v Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% N Approach E Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT 0 963 517 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0 28 17 49 0 67 25 53 0.2508 888 836 A B C +. .00. .38 .58 .89 .0 4.7 20.9 26.2 0 19 45 81 0 106 113 167 0 10 13 12 0 133 163 297 N Approach E Approach 1480 B+ .45 10.4 64 219 Phase 2 I Phase 3 v 163 G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.3% 0 453 406 1218 0/0 24/2 12/1 24/2 0 15 29 34 0 23 65 37 0 803 1028 1387 B A C+ 00 .56 .40 .88 .0 21.8 6.0 23.7 0 41 10 121 0 100 48 284 1199 C+ .77 24.5 122 267 297 S Approach RT TH LT 0 12 5 25 0 0 148 120 322 0 S Approach 1624 B .76 19.3 131 332 23 24 30 322 0 0 07/18/97 12:51:43 Ped= .0 sec = .0% W Approach Int RT TH LT. Total 0 0 0 0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 4303 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7450 B .00 .00 .00 .00 .66 .0 .0 .0 .0 17.7 0 0 0 0 317 0 0 0 0 818 0 0 0 77 0 0 0 322 Int W Approach Total 0 4303 B .00 .66 .0 17.7 0 317 0 818 0 77 0 322 0023 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. • Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Appr Grade •% Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type E • . S W North 0 .0 0 / + / 343 24.0 2 0 .0 0 -- 0 .0 0 RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT . 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0 Y Y Y 3 3 3 . 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .89 .90 .77 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 . 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .88 .88 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 . 0 2.0 2.0. 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Sq 21 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 * * / ** + + + +. * * ** + +> V G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% 0 .0 0 818 24.0 2 + v G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% 467 24.0 2 \ 0 .0 0 1028 24.0 2 G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF=72.3% \ 664 12.0 1 659 12.0 1 0 .0 0 / North 07/18/97 13:15:59 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 0024 ^i 5' 'w tid .3.niz3 ds�w'w` as :;ovsua s ' i c�"er. W. lsi�i r : } Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph vph - -- vph N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 818 .88 930 TH 930 2 1.05 976 .00 .00 N -LT 467 .93 502 LT 502 2 1.03 517 1.00 .00 E -RT 664 .89 746 RT 746 1 1.00 746 .00 1.00 E -TH 0 .90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -LT 343 .77 445 LT 445 2 1.03 458 1.00 .00 S -RT 659 .88 749 RT 749 1 1.00 749 .00 1.00 S -TH 1028 .88 1168 TH 1168 2 1.05 1226 .00 .00 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 07/18/97 13:15:59 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet :Ap. Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr. •Group Ideal of Sat ch " Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy .Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 E- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 E- LT 1900 2. 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 S RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 S- TH 1900 .2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 0025 z Z I- LU J 0, O 0 ' t. 0 , vo w I J H w u_ -J 22 a H z � 1- o; LIJ D a • y, UJ U` tL O Z ; z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane 1 ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp P vphg vph TH 976 3725 .262 .673 2508 .389 N- LT Pri. 517 3539 .146 .251 888 .582 E- RT E -. LT S- RT S- TH Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay pr .Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact ch.: Mvts v/c g/C d1 DF -- -- sec /v N- TH N- LT E- RT. E_ LT. • ;S- , RT S TH Cycle= 60" Int Total •.693 746 1583 .471 .528 836 .892 Pri. 458 3539 .129 .227 803 .570 749 1583 .473 .649 1028 .729 1226 3725 .329 .372 Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph - . 389 .673 3.3 .85 2508 16 .582 .251 15.0 .85 888 16 . 892 .528 9.6 .85 836 16 . 570 .227 15.7 .85 803 16 .729 .649 5.3 .85 1028 16 .884 .372 13.4 .85 1387 16 1 387 .884 Sum(v /s) = .800 Xc = .889 * 07/18/97 13:15:59 Incr Lane Lan Delay Group Grp Appr Appr d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS sec /v sec /v - sec /v - .05 2.9 A .73 13.5 B > 6.5 B+ 8.49 16.7 C+ .73 14.0 B > 15.7 C+ 1.85 ' 6.4 B+ 5.11. 16.5 C+ > 12.7 B > 11.5 B 0026 r�1Y; 1"+ w 'l t." Ji'" ti!« sY.". s' sI' �F�l+' ttiFl.+ a' i/".*:\:'; iSi' Nacrry2n3�kidtn4}'- k+ ti,"{ fiYL' i° ht` Jl iTtivtY:fi.Y�i"L.�il`r::Wi�i:''; L:ti:u.�a `i�n<ti,''�'tis(.'A'k':� " "k mow u6 U o '. o: CD 11.1 J 1- w O, U � a _ z �. o ' z uj U . U. -O. Z: U W' O Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Strander Boulevard on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAP'AC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 21 * * / ** / North Phase 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 + + + + * * ** + +> V G /C= .234 G= 14.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% + + V G /C= .356 G= 21.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =30.1% G /C= .210 G= 12.6" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =72.30 07/18/97 13:16:00 C= 60 sec G= 48.0 sec = 80.0% Y =12.0 sec = 20.0% Ped= .0 sec = .0% MVMT TOTALS N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Int Param:Units RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total AdjVol: vph 0 976 517 746 0 458 749 1226 0 0 0 0 4672 Wid /Ln :ft /# 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0/0 24/2 12/1 24/2 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 g/C Rqd @C:% 0 28 17 49 0 15 50 34 0 0 0 0 g/C Used: % 0 67 25 53 0 23 65 37 0 0 0 0 SV @E: vph 02508 888 836 0 803 1028 1387 0 0 0 0 7450 Svc Lvl:LOS A B C+ B B+ C+ B Deg Sat:v /c .00 .39 .58 .89 00 .57 .73 .88 .00 .00 .00 .00 .69 Avg Del:s /v .0 4.8 20.9 26.2 .0 21.8 10.3 24.3 .0 .0 .0 .0 17.7 Tot Del:min 0 19 45 81 0 42 32 124 0 0 0 0 343 # Stops:veh 0 108 113 167 0 102 125 287 0 0 0 0 902 Max Que:veh 0 11 13 12 0 12 9 26 0 0 0 0 83 Max Que: ft 0 135 163 297 0 149 222 325 0 0 0 0 325 APPR TOTALS Int Param:Units N Approach E Approach S Approach W Approach Total AdjVol: vph 1493 1204 1975 0 4672 Svc Lvl:LOS B+ C+ B B Deg Sat:v /c .46 .77 .82 .00 .69 Avg Del:s /v 10.4 24.5 19.0 .0 17.7 Tot Del:min 64 123 156 0 343 # Stops:veh 221 269 412 0 902 Max Que:veh 24 24 35 0 83 Max Que: ft 163 297 325 0 325 0027 .. :::i;.; s 4*['�ISiY.`..0 { :Yh+�4il�k +.�{7aT%Y�XJ1Y`.Un�tt�1�1.k�i �Ni. �41: 4v�. �axY.". TdC� W.tN14.elLChvl9 %?Wt %y1Yle.s.T!' "lTIORT H.+' f��. �' 10,Ai4 %*'n�F�`OipVe: i.tlf Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. N : E S . W S 31 • ** / ** / North 725 12.0 1 / 268 12.0 1 0 .0 0 -- 406 12.0 1 $ RT: TH LT Loc •Nm Nb . 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 . 0 2.0. 2.0 2.0 NO 0 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 . 0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 <* + + + ++ * + v * + G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% C= 90 sec 434 24.0 2 Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% .0 0 1066 24.0 2 * * <* 322 24.0 2 0 . 0 RT TH 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 .86 .90 .93 0 .90 .90 .90 0 .90 .92 .88 0 .77 .90 .92 G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.50 G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= / North 04/24/97 09:56:21 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES Phasing: SEQUENCE 31 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% .0 sec = .0% 2 Z Q W 00 moo.. W = w 0 . - CO d . w. z � H- 0 Z t- U O N o w w. I-- = p - Z z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions t z Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of :. H w -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT 6 -- vph -- vph -- vph - vph mot) 00 N -RT 725 .86 843 RT 843 1 1.00 843 .00 1.00 N 0 ' N -TH 434 .90 482 TH 482 2 1.05 506 .00 .00 w = N -LT 0 .93 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 ' -I S-RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 w ° 2 S -TH 322 .92 350 TH 350 2 1.05 367 .00 .00 g 5 . S -LT 1 066 .88 1 21 1 LT 1 21 1 2 1.03 1 247 1.00 .00 u.< W -RT 406 .77 527 RT 527 1 1.00 527 .00 1.00 1 : i ,.._; W -TH 0 .90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 z H W -LT 268 .92 291 • LT 291 1 1.00 291 1.00 .00 F- O : z i-; SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet 04/24/97 09:56:21 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet p N I- Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj = W; pr .. Group Ideal • of Sat- • 1- c• ch, Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow ~O`, i -- pcphg Width. Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg Z • U N ; N- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 H; N TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 0 S- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 S- LT 1900. 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 W- RT 1900 1 1.000. .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 W- LT 1900. 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 2 5 Ap pr ch • • Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Lane Group Mvts N- RT N- TH S- TH S- LT W- RT W- LT LT Phase Type ,Cycle= 90" Irit'' Total :725 Adj Flow Rate vph Adj Satfl Rate vphg Flow Ratio v/s 843 1583 .532 506 3725 .136 367 3725 .099 Pri. 1247 3539 .352 Pri. 291 527. 1583 .333 Cycle Length, C 90 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec N- RT .951 .559 14.2 N- TH .580 .234 23.2 S- TH .154 .641 4.9 S LT .943 .374 20.7 W RT .476 .699 4.6 W -. LT: .564 .292 20.5 1770 .164 Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact ch Mvts v/c g/C d1 DF -- -- sec /v Green Ratio g/C Lane Group Capac vph V/C Ratio v/c Crit Lane Grp . 559 886 .951 . 234 873 .580 . 641 2390 .154 .374 1323 .943 . 699 1107 .476 . 292 516 .564 Sum(v /s) .885 Xc = .948 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Lane Cal Group Term Capac m. vph Incr Delay d2 sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v Lan LOS Delay A LOS - sec /v - .85 886 16 14.29 26.4 D+ . 85 873 16 .72 20.4 C > 24.1 C . 85 2390 16 .00 4.1 A . 85 1323 16 9.80 27.4 D+ > 22.1 C .85 1107 16 .26 4.2 A . 85 516 16 1.08 18.5 C+ > 9.3 B+ > 20.1 C 04/24/97 09:56:22 30 ;:,%f_i:u�a;.:::�:" • �r:. 3C. r` 5 li:: isx.' Y':':' w '1 ^:lii ^;i::4 .>' 6' ��i. a? psiit�ti• � _ �ii:^:4�:'."L`s➢it{ ".a��:�s'vi t� .. ���lr.�'r`li:Gr: :f;iCfirlfsii�ii:C:Ja:i.•�•. z H IX 2 0 O co o' cn w • LL w= w0 g Q , co _° . ▪ w z �: 0 . Z E- g � . U CI H w w `. - 0 LL• Z 0 H '. O z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 31 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 Phase 3 * * / ** North <* + + + ++ * + v * + C= 90 sec MVMT TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:.ft /# g/C Rgd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% * * <* 843 506 12/1 24/2 56 19 56 23 886 873 D+ C .95 .58 31.0 31.5 109 66 199 112 19 19 470 245 1349 C .81 31 .2 175 311 v G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% G= 78.0 sec N Approach RT TH LT N Approach 38 470 * * <* G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% = 86.7% Y =12.0 E Approach RT TH LT 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A D+ .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .15 .94 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 6.6 44.9 0 0 0 0 0 10 233 0 0 0 0 0 36 301 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E Approach 0 .00 .0 0 0 0 sec = 13.3% S Approach RT TH LT 0 367 1247 0/0 24/2 24/2 0 15 38 0 64 37 0 2390 1323 S Approach 1614 A .48 7.4 16 59 7 39 8 83 494 201 C .76 36.2 243 337 04/24/97 09:56:22 Ped= .0 sec = .0% W Approach Int RT TH LT Total 527 0 291 3781 12/1 0/0 12/1 39 0 23 70 0 29 1107 0 516 7095 C+ C .00 .56 .73 .0 29.4 29.9 0 36 470 0 62 769 0 10 102 0 261 494 Int W Approach Total 818 3781 B+ C .51 .73 15.2 29.9 52 470 121 769 46 18 102 494 261 494 31 w !, ':i` ^i':i., ?'..:...,. f i�l:::'ti 'S^.j s'•e' vet.: * :., '��ia ss'ro�i�l¢+cY >i7stssiit ka'4t4Lii:+ t�r3aa� 3`- '':�?TSr z W : re J 0 0 CO C W = J H N LLi w 0 2 gQ fit a _ .. z � O : z 2 • p. o CO CI W W - LJ - O w Z : 0 W F= O C Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - • Sq 31 . * * / ** /•\ North 880 12.0 1 325 12.0 1 0 .0 0 493 12.0 1 'LOSTTIME =' sec. Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type RT TH N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO Phase 1 <* + + + ++ * + v * + G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% C= 90 sec / 527 24.0 2 V G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% .0 0 \ 1294 24.0 2 391 24.0 2 \ Q .0 0 0 .0 0 / 0 .0 0 0 .0 0 LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT 0 0 .86 .90 .93 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0 0 .90 .92 .88 0 0 .77 .90 .92 * * <* G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% 0- 0- G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= North Y Y Y Area Location Type:. NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES / \ Phasing: SEQUENCE 31 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Y Y Y Y 07/18/97 13:02:05 3 3 3 3 _. :... :.. vn* ane. �iJS1L•::::::{l Sx" 3% 4C:,,? n^. ri ^,iwika+:'u:.:f:'k114�{»iSati:i 'rL1r�:.'3:S.iywY.'FC! Vi t��,.,ss'. itiiAlr 3 3 3 3 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% 003:2 3 3 3 3 .0 sec = .0% Z w: 65.• 0 0 CO C V) al' J � w 0; 1 w•Q. • a. 1-- la Z I- 2 j U �. • ;01. w W; I- U ILA .Z • Z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph -- vph - vph N -RT 880 .86 1023 RT 1023 1 1.00 1023 .00 1.00 N -TH 527 .90 586 TH 586 2 1.05 615 .00 .00 N -LT 0 .93 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -TH 391 .92 425 TH 425 2 1.05 446 .00 .00 S -LT 129 .88 1470 LT 1470 2 1.03 1514 1.00 .00 W -RT 493 .77 640 RT 640 1 1.00 640 .00 1.00 W -TH 0 .90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -LT 325 .92 353 LT 353 1 1.00 353 1.00 .00 07/18/97 13:02:06 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of Sat - ch' Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow - . pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 S- TH 1900 . 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 S- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 W- RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 0033 •,:'iP:S::.' "r.ti:l` IS;. !ti.S.i: �' ' 4 Gl:.� Y T 2 ar : "::Cn��.:S. . 'i4�;�+::5`'ui; :fin d'< i". J. !is:"kl:�^'�I.&Uitat.k'mm' aavta;axnir'f MfX,i'{wR34:�9; Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap pr ch Lane Group Mvts N- RT N - TH S- TH S- LT W- RT W- LT LT Adj Phase Flow Type Rate vph Pri. 353 Adj Satfl Rate vphg 1023 1583 .646 615 3725 .165 446 3725 .120 Pri. 1514 3539 .428 640 1583 .404 Cycle Length, C 90 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 Ap Lane ,pr Group ch Adyts N- RT 1.155 N- TH .704 W- RT W- LT Cycle= 90" Int.. Total Vol Green Ratio Ratio v/c g/C 1 770 .199 Unif Delay d1 sec /v Delay Fact DF . 559 15.1 .85 . 234 24.0 .85 S TH .187 .641 5.0 .85 S LT. 1.144 .374 21.4@ .85 .578 .699 5.2 .85 .683 .292 21.4 .85 Flow Ratio v/s @ expect more delay due to .880 Green Ratio g/C . 559 886 1.155 .234 873 .704 . 641 2390 .187 . 374 Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph Lane Group Capac vph 1 323 1 . 1 44 .699 1107 .578 .292 517 .683 Sum(v /s) = 1.074 Xc = 1.151 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Incr Delay d2 sec /v V/C Ratio v/c Lane Group Delay sec /v Crit Lane Grp * Lan Grp LOS Delay sec /v 07/18/97 13:02:06 Appr 886 16 84.46 97.3 F 873 16 1.81 22.2 C > 69.1 F 2390 16 .00 4.3 A 1323 16 70.64@ 88.8@ F > 69.6@ F 1107 16 .57 5.0 A 517 16 2.56 20.8 C > 10.6 B extreme v /c's (see EVALUATE) > 56.7@ E 0031 I I- ~ W 00 cn w W I: J w O. g ¢ . N a ~ I HO Z ILI W . • 0 ' , CI I- I ▪ V t~ 0, ui z w F O z c 1 1 North AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft / # g/C Rqd @C:% I g/ Used: v vph P Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 31 1 Phase 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 * * / ** / <* + + + ++ * + v * + C= 90 sec MVMT TOTALS N Approach Param:Units RT TH LT Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del :min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh f Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh .Max Que:veh Max Que: ft G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% F C 1.15 .70 82.5 33.4 352 86 255 141 G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 1023 615 0 0 0 0 0 446 1514 640 0 353 4591 12/1 24/2 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 66 21 0 0 0 0 0 17 45 45 0 26 56 23 0 0 0 0 0 64 37 70 0 29 886 873 0 0 0 0 0 2390 1323 1107 0 517 7096 54 24 1360 298 N Approach 1638 F .99 64.1 438 396 78 1360 0 0 0 0 * * <* G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R 4.0" OFF =67.5% E Approach S Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT A F A C E .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .19 1.14 .58 .00 .68 .88 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 6.7 85.2 8.6 .0 32.0 55.3 0 0 0 0 0 13 537 23 0 47 1058 0 0 0 0 0 45 378 81 0 78 978 E Approach .00 0 0 0 8 89 10 0 0 0 101 1128 244 0 .0 0 0 0 0 S Approach 1960 F .93 67.3 550 423 07/18/97 13:02:06 W Approach Int RT TH LT Total 0 12 197 0 316 1360 Int W Approach Total 993 4591 B E .62 .88 16.9 55.3 70 1058 159 978 97 22 197 1128 316 1360 0037 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Area Location Type: NONCBD LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .86 .90 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO ' 0 0 .90 .90 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .92 .88 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .77 .90 .92 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 / \ North 498 12.0 1 0 .0 0 -- <* + + + ++ * + v * + 880 12.0 1 G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% * * <* 533 24.0 2 325 12.0 1 / + $ RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 V G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7$ .0 0 1 299 24.0 2 * * <* 393 24.0 2 .0 0 Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES \ 0 .0 0 / \ 0 .0 0 / 0 .0 0 North 07/18/97 13:19:58 Phasing: SEQUENCE 31 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .281 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= 25.3" G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= 4.0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF=67.5% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% CaP.1∎ P?� z H Z ' • W 6 • 2 -J U W I J ~ w O g Q w. z � I- o Z F- D p. 0 F w -• H V ; { ti = .. ~ O ~ z. Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Appr Mvt Flow Lane -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group vph -- vph N -RT 880 .86 1023 N -TH 533 .90 592 N -LT 0 .93 0 S -RT 0 .90 0 S -TH 393 .92 427 S -LT 1299 .88 1476 W -RT 498 .77 647 W -TH 0 .90 0 W -LT 325 .92 353 .Ap • pr.. ch Lane Group Mvmts No Ideal of Satfl Lns pcphg - RT ' 1023 TH 592 -- 0 TH LT RT LT Group Flow vph 1 2 0 0 0 427 2 1476 2 647 0 353 Adjustment Worksheet No.of Lane Lanes Util 1 0 1 1 .00 1 .05 1.00 1.00 1 .05 1.03 1 .00 1 .00 1 .00 Adjustment Factors Adj Prop.of Flow LT RT vph 1 023 .00 1.00 622 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 448 .00 .00 1 520 1.00 .00 647 .00 1.00 0 .00 .00 353 1.00 .00 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Left Adj Turn Fact 07/18/97 13:19:58 - RT 1900 1 1.000. .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 TH 1900 2 1.000: .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 • S- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 S- LT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 3539 1900 . 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 W- RT W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 Adj Sat flow vphg N- RT N- TH S- TH S- LT W- RT W- LT Ap Lane pr Group ch Mvts N RT N- TH S- TH W- ..RT W LT Cycle= 90" Int Total Pri. 353 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp P vphg vph 1583 .646 622 3725 .167 448 3725 .120 Pri. 1520 3539 .429 647 1583 .409 Cycle Length, C 90 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec 1770 .199 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Vol Green Unif Delay Ratio Ratio Delay Fact v/c g/C dl DF -- -- sec /v 1.155 .559 15.1 .85 . 712 .234 24.1 .85 . 187 .641 5.0 .85 1.149 .374 21.4@ .85 . 584 .699 5.2 .85 . 683 .292 21.4 .85 . 559 . 374 Sum(v /s) Xc = Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph - 886 1 . 1 55 . 234 873 .712 . 641 2390 .187 .699 1107 .584 .292 517 .683 886 16 84.46 873 16 1.92 * 1323 1.149 1.076 1.152 Incr Lane Lan Delay Group Grp Appr Appr d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS sec /v sec /v - sec /v 97.3 F 22.4 C > 69.0 expect more delay due to extreme v /c's (see EVALUATE) 07/18/97 13:19:59 2390 16 .00 4.3 A 1323 16 70.64@ 88.8@ F > 69.6@ F 1107 16 .59 5.0 B+ 517 16 2.56 20.8 C > 10.6 B .883. > 56.6@ E iskb4r if;kditAG 0038 re al J U. U O : N p, W W • • LL WO -j - a � z = . 1- O z Lij W O O W W : 1^ • O ui z . U 5 : O z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila Klickitat Drive on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions with Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 31 ( Phase 1 * * / ** / North <* + + + ++ * + v * + MVMT TOTALS N Approach Param:Units RT TH LT AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rgd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max'Que•veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft G /C= .363 G= 32.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% * * <* C= 90 sec G= 78.0 sec = 86.7% Y =12.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 1023 622 12/1 24/2 66 21 56 23 886 873 V G /C= .223 G= 20.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =40.7% F C 1.15 .71 82.5 33.6 352 87 0 255 143 0 54 24 0 1360 301 0 N Approach 1645 F .99 64.0 439 398 Phase 2 I Phase 3 78 1360 * * <* G /C= .281 G= 25.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =67.5% E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 0 0 0 0 0 448 1520 647 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 24/2 24/2 12/1 0 0 0 0 0 17 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 64 37 70 0 0 0 0 0 2390 1323 1107 A F .00 00 .00 .00 .00 .19 1.15 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 6.7 86.5 0 0 0 0 13 548 0 0 0 . 0 46 380 0 0 0 0 0 0 E Approach 0 .00 .0 0 0 0 0 8 91 10 0 12 199 0 102 1147 246 0 316 1360 S Approach 1968 F .93 68.3 561 426 B+ .58 8.7 23 82 07/18/97 13:19:59 0 353 4613 0/0 12/1 0 26 0 29 0 517 7096 C E .00 .68 .88 .0 32.0 55.6 0 47 1 070 0 78 984 Int W Approach Total 1 000 4613 B E .62 .88 16.9 55.6 70 1070 160 984 99 22 199 1147 316 1360 0039 iJi ..1; :r,5 .I.'. �;'��'%C+:f; Cvilr.V A:tiS;t lki :ti "' : « , .t ,, ti•.r q 7tv 1 4 it ��;, x;i � .:;3 �, r3�' a�« l�f�; �ZS�' �at, �: iF: �: Sa:' z. ctt:; k. ri: iuu: ��t� .,uuna�fi��i'��:'+h�oF`�. mew^ �Gk �.- i�"'' a' 1 z. �' �., �, N�. �" ��. �ct��{ 3�ri�" �` wiY�us; 6; a, `� .s;.Yrx�, �`�%'.��iYeA;�'`a. k Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Area Location Type: NONCBD North 157 12.0 1 / + 89 12.0 1 -- 5 .0 0 0 .0 0 LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 911 24.0 2 Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type $ RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 E .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .81 .90 .84 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .80 .95 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 3 W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 .50 .66 .58 0- Y Y Y 3 3 .3 Sq 11 Phase 1 * */ ** G /C= .449 G= 27.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% Phase 2 + + ++ v + + + +> + + ++ v 45 12.0 1 \ \ 0 .0 0 776 24.0 2 \ 52 .0 0 0 12.0 1 / 243 12.0 1 71 .0 0 Phase 3 Phase 4 r^1 Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES / \ North 04/24/97 10:16:06 Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .417 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= 25.0" G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= 4.0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF=51.6% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 40 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet 04/24/97 10:16:07 Q Z I- Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of 1. 1 -- Z -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT cell vph -- vph vph - -- vph 6 t=i U O N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 to 0 `N -TH 911 .88 1 035 TH 1 035 2 1.05 1 087 .00 .00 ' u) w, Ill N -LT 45 .93 48 LT 48 1 1.00 48 1.00 .00 -J � . ta LL E -RT 52 .81 64 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 w O : E -TH 0 .90 0 TH +RT 64 1 1.00 64 .00 1.00 2 E E -LT 243 .84 289 LT 289 1 1.00 289 1.00 .00 u.< S -RT 71 .80 89 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 H W S-TH 776 .95 817 TH +RT 906 2 1.05 951 .00 .10 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 ? F H O z f-' W -RT 5 .50 10 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W W -TH 89 .66 135 TH +RT 145 1 1.00 145 .00 .07 W -LT 157 .58 271 LT 271 1 1.00 271 1.00 .00 U ° 'o H ;: =w H U SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet u. 1- O, Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj LLi� pr Group Ideal of Sat- �? _ ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow pf -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg z.. N- TH 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .143 1.00 266 E- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .657 1.00 1224 S- TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .985 1.000 1.00 3671 W- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .990 1.000 1.00 1843 W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 41 c LTC - Left Turns per Cycle Voic - Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle Rpo - Opposing Platoon Ratio gf - First. LT Effect. Green qro - Opposing Queue Ratio gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green gu.- Unsaturated Effect. Green fs LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) PL - Proportion of LT (9 -17) n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) EL1 - TH Equivalent for LT EL2 - Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18). fmin - Minimum Value for fLT fm LT Factor for LT (9 -17) fLT - LT Factor for Lane Group • t Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Approach Input /Calculation N -LT E -LT S -LT C - Cycle Length G - Actual Green Time g - Effective Green Time go - Opp. Effective Green Time N - Number of Lanes No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate PLT - Proportion of LT PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate tL - Lost Time 60.0000 26.9690 27.9690 27.9690 1 .0000 2.0000 48.0000 1.0000 . 0000 951 .0000 3.0000 .8000 7.9250 1.0000 . 0000 . 5339 8.4992 19.4697 . 2806 1.0000 4.2496 1 .0000 5.6855 . 0000 • 1430 . 1430 . 1430 60.0000 25.0310 26.0310 26.0310 1 .0000 1 .0000 289.0000 1.0000 .0000 145.0000 3.0000 4.8167 2.4167 1.0000 .0000 . 5661 . 0000 26.0310 . 7844 1.0000 . 0000 1.0000 1 .5213 . 0000 . 1537 . 6574 . 6574 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000. .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 04/24/97 10:16:07 W -LT .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 000.0 . 0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 ...•Y r... ... L .,.,..: t.. :; t;r 1h'�9:^u...;CJ3iteiriY�A: iN saavi:; 5L�..(: A' 4:: n.• 1ii�* 1Li+.", ku•.'#::[ AO..( Sa;` �K"..-•{"! ? ;�td4.�i�?ii,}YS:A.t:9MManw.•.. _..... �. - .. ........... z „ W. QQ om:. J 00 : CO CI W I J 1 ur 0 . J . LL • a H w. z 1._ z 0 , wW 2 n o. o ,o) - w W '. Z ▪ f •u. ~0 !, tii o r • Outback - " Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Z Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit H w; • pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane • 6 =, • ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp _.10: -- vph vphg vph - 0 O: Et Au J NV„, WI 0 ; S TH+RT 951 3671 .259 .466 1711 .556 . cy = ' w F- _. Z f- F- 0 Z I-. Ua • `O N• JO F-. ..wuj .1 V; , O . 0 FH O Z N- TH 1087 3725 .292 .466 1737 .626 * N- LT Pri. 48 266 .180' .466 124 .387 E- TH +RT 64 1583 .040 .434 687 .093 E- LT Pri. 289 1224 .236 .434 531 .544 W- TH +RT 145 1843 .079 .434 800. .181 W- LT Pri. 271 1770 .153 .434 768 .353 Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec Sum(v /s) _ .528 Xc = .586 04/24/97 10:16:08 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Ap,. Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts 'v /c g/C d1 DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS vph - sec /v sec /v - sec /v - sec /v N TH .626 .466 9.2 .85 1737 16 .52 8.3 B+ N - LT .387 .466 7.9 .85 124 16 1.02 7.8 B+ > 8.3 B+ E - TH +RT .093 .434 7.6 .85 687 16 .00 6.5 B+ E- LT .544 .434 9.6 .85 531 16 .90 9.0 B+ > 8.6 B+ S- TH +RT .556 .466 8.8 .85 1711 16 .31 7.8 B+ > 7.8 B+ W- TH +RT .181 .434 7.9 .85 800 16 .01 6.8 B+ W- LT .353 .434 8.6 .85 768 16 .12 7.5 B+ > 7.2 B+ Cycle= 60" Int Total .530 > 8.0 B+ ..�n.':; i,� =;i F � Ci•;,�'�.ikfi:� _'� JS'n.' �+. �& SS: nA. Yixi;< iti1k. 1 ' 1 ,+ r. G.. i�wv��; ri�.:; v�rk�i '.ti:� +xb::reiC.a�.n:Jr,.i:s� :�xws.,e., Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Current 1997 Conditions SIGNAL94 /TEAPACEV1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 11 1 Phase 1 * * / ** / North MVMT TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat :v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s/v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh r Max Que: ft G /C= .449 G= 27.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% Phase 2 G /C= .417 G= 25.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =51.6% C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% N Approach RT TH LT 0 1087 0/0 24/2 12/1 0 31 0 0 47 47 0 1737 119 B+ B+ .00 .63 .39 .0 13.1 18.9 0 59 4 0 205 8 0 19 1 0 245 25 N Approach 11 35 B+ .62 13.3 63 213 E Approach S Approach RT TH LT RT TH LT 64 0 289 93 858 0 10 135 271 2855 0/0 12/1 12/1 0/0 24/2 0/0 0/0 12/1 12/1 0 7 28 0 28 0 0 11 19 0 43 43 0 47 0 0 43 43 0 687 531 0 1711 0 0 800 768 6353 B+ B+ B+ B+ B+ B+ .00 .09 .54 .00 .56 .00 .00 .18 .35 .53 .0 10.3 15.6 .0 12.4 .0 .0 10.9 12.4 13.0 0 3 19 0 49 0 0 7 14 155 0 9 54 0 171 0 0 22 45 514 0 1 5 0 31 138 E Approach 353 B+ .46 14.6 22 63 0 17 0 214 S Approach 951 B+ .56 12.4 49 171 04/24/97 10:16:08 W Approach Int RT TH LT Total 0 0 3 5 51 0 0 69 129 245 Int W Approach Total 416 2855 B+ B+ .29 .53 11.9 13.0 21 155 67 514 20 6 17 8 51 245 138 214 129 245 4 '1144aahot '4;41 2 UO N 0 w= Jam ID O g N a . 1- Ili Z Z 0 U� O w w , Z I- U w - 0 z c Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT vph -- vph vph - -- vph N -RT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 N -TH 1106 .88 1257 TH 1257 2 1.05 1320 .00 .00 N -LT 55 .93 59 LT 59 1 1.00 59 1.00 .00 E -RT 63 .81 78 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 E -TH 0 .90 0 TH +RT 78 1 1.00 78 .00 1.00 E -LT 295 .84 351 LT 351 1 1.00 351 1.00 .00 S -RT 86 .80 107 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 S -TH 942 .95 992 TH +RT 1099 2 1.05 1154 .00 .10 S -LT 0 .90 0 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -RT 6 .50 12 0 0 1.00 0 .00 .00 W -TH 108 .66 164 TH +RT 176 1 1.00 176 .00 .07 W -LT 191 .58 329 LT 329 1 1.00 329 1.00 .00 SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors . Adj pr Group Ideal of .. Sat - ch Mvmts. Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH. 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N LT. 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .143 1.00 266 E- TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .850 1.000 1.00 1583 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .600 1.00 1118 S TH +RT 1900 2 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .985 1.000 1.00 3671 W TH +RT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 .990 1.000 1.00 1844 W- LT 1900 1 1.000 .980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 .950 1.00 1770 • 07/18/97 13:10:06 0, zz u Q ) D Joi oo 0: . CO =; J H w 0 ` I L i d! Z c o O z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC(V1 L1.4] - HCM Supplemental LT- Factor Worksheet Approach Input /Calculation N -LT E -LT S -LT C - Cycle Length G - Actual Green Time g - Effective Green Time go - Opp. Effective Green Time N - Number of Lanes No - No. of Opp. Lanes (9 -17) vLT - Adjusted LT Flow Rate PLT - Proportion of LT PLTo - Prop. of Opp. LT (9 -18) vo - Adjusted Opp. Flow Rate tL - Lost Time LTC -.Left Turns per Cycle Volc'- Opp. Flow /Lane /Cycle Rpo = Opposing Platoon Ratio gf - First LT Effect. Green qro - Opposing Queue Ratio gq - Opp. Queue Effect. Green gu - Unsaturated Effect. Green fs - LT Satur. Factor (9 -17) PL - Proportion of LT (9 -17) n - Max. Opp. Vehicles (9 -18) PTHo - Prop. TH in Opp. (9 -18) EL1:- TH Equivalent for LT EL2 -.Opp. TH Equiv. (9 -18) fmin - Minimum Value for fLT fm,- LT Factor for LT (9 -17) fLT - LT Factor for Lane Group 60.0000 26.9700 27.9700 27.9700 1.0000 2.0000 59.0000 1.0000 .0000 1154.0000 3.0000 . 9833 9.6167 1.0000 . 0000 . 5338 12.1115 15.8585 .1538 1.0000 6.0557 1.0000 9.4340 . 0000 .1430 .1430 .1430 60.0000 25.0300 26.0300 26.0300 1.0000 1.0000 351.0000 1.0000 . 0000 176.0000 3.0000 5.8500 2.9333 1 .0000 . 0000 . 5662 . 6815 25.3485 . 7650 1.0000 . 3407 1.0000 1.6220 . 0000 . 1537 .6004 . 6004 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 07/18/97 13:10:06 W -LT . 0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 F c sri ;r: C i NA i ''� +% v i'fa'4 k iPKi' wauiX3ls; ti a ! /ruXw£' `6u i v'aSEL:t v 1cisivr„aahzd•41 gfin?,dRk A' iu i;.,14 .0000 . 0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 .0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 0000 . 000 . 0000 • Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila 1-5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - Evaluation of Intersection Performance Sq 11 Phase 1 * * / ** / North MVMT TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Wid /Ln:ft /# g/C Rqd @C:% g/C Used: % SV @E: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft APPR TOTALS Param:Units AdjVol: vph Svc Lvl:LOS Deg Sat:v /c Avg Del:s /v Tot Del:min # Stops:veh Max Que:veh Max Que: ft G /C= .449 G= 27.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% Phase 2 C= 60 sec G= 52.0 N Approach RT TH LT 0 1320 59 78 0 351 0/0 24/2 12/1 0/0 12/1 12/1 0 37 0 0 8 36 0 47 47 0 43 43 0 1737 119 0 687 485 B+ B+ B+ B .00 .76 .48 .00 .11 .72 .0 15.0 22.6 .0 10.4 20.6 0 83 6 0 3 30 0 .273 10 0 12 72 0 23 0 297 G /C= .417 G= 25.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =51.6% N Approach 1379 B+ .75 15.3 89 283 24 297 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% E Approach S Approach W Approach Int RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total 1 0 1 7 27 0 37 168 E Approach 429 B .61 18.7 33 84 8 168 112 1042 0/0 24/2 0 33 0 47 0 1711 B+ .00 .67 .0 13.7 0 66 0 225 0 21 0 260 S Approach 1154 B+ .67 13.7 66 225 21 260 0 07/18/97 13:10:07 0 12 164 329 3467 0/0 0/0 12/1 12/1 0 0 13 22 0 0 43 43 0 0 800 768 6307 B+ B+ B+ .00 .00 .22 .43 .65 .0 .0 11.2 13.2 14.8 0 0 8 18 214 0 0 28 57 677 0 0 3 6 62 0 0 84 157 297 Int W Approach Total 505 3467 B+ B+ .36 .65 12.5 14.8 26 214 85 677 9 62 157 297 0047 Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 Ap pr ch N- N- Ap pr ch Lane Group Mvts LT Phase Type TH 1320 LT Pri. 59 E- TH +RT E- LT Pri. S- TH +RT 1154 W - TH +RT 176 W - LT Pri. 329 Cycle Length, C 60 sec Lost Time Per Cycle, L 6.0 sec SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Level -of- Service Worksheet Lane Vol Group Ratio Mvts v/c N- • 'TH, .760 N- LT .476 E- TH +RT .114 E- LT .724 S- TH +RT .674 W- TH +RT .220 W- LT • ..428 Cycle= 60" Int Total .650 L1.4] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Adj Flow Rate vph Adj Satfl Rate vphg 78 1583 .049 .434 687 .114 351 1118 Green Ratio g/C 3725 .354 .466 1737 .760 266 .221 .466 124 .476 3671 .314 .466 1711 .674 1844 .095 1 770 .186 Unif Delay d1 sec /v Delay Fact DF .466 10.1 .85 . 466 8.3 .85 . 434 7.7 .85 .434 10.7 .85 .466 9.5 .85 .434 8.1 .85 .434 9.0 .85 Flow Ratio v/s Green Ratio g/C Lane Group Capac vph V/C Ratio v/c .314 .434 485 . .724 .434 800 .220 .434 768 .428 Sum(v /s) = .668 Xc = .742 Lane Cal Group Term Capac m vph - Incr Delay d2 sec /v Lane Group Delay sec /v 1737 16 1.41 10.0 124 16 2.18 9.3 687 16 .00 6.5 485 16 3.65 12.7 1711 16 .75 8.8 800 16 .02 6.9 768 16 .25 7.9 Crit Lane Grp * Lan Grp LOS 07/18/97 13:10:07 Delay Appr sec /v - B+ B+ > 9.9 B+ B+ B > 11.6 B B+ > 8.8 B+ B+ B+ > 7.5 B+ > 9.4 B+ 0048 z ~Z : 5 oo (0 o' W = J u_ wo LLQ I w Z Z1- W gy p. O N ; ww H - Li. - Z ui ~ _ 0 F .. z Outback Steakhouse - Tukwila I -5 Off. .Ramp, Mall Entrance on Southcenter Parkway Future 2010 Conditions without Project SIGNAL94 /TEAPAC[V1 L1.4] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - Area Location Type: NONCBD Sq 11 * * / ** North 6 .0 0 G /C= .449 G= 27.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= .0% .0 0 191 12.0 1 / + 108 12.0 1 -- LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 1106 24.0 2 Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds /hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO E. .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO S .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO W .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 + + ++ v + + + +> + + ++ v G /C= .417 G= 25.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =51.6% 55 12.0 1 0 .0 0• 942 24.0 2 \ 63 .0 0 0 12.0 1 / 295 12.0 1 86 .0 0 / \ North 07/18/97 13:10:05 Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES Phasing: SEQUENCE 11 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD 0 0 .90 .88 .93 0- Y Y Y 3 3 0 0 .81 .90 .84 0- Y Y Y 3 3 0 0 .80 .95 .90 0- Y Y Y 3 3 0 0 .50 .66 .58 0- Y Y Y 3 3 G /C= .000 G= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% Phase 4 1 Phase 5 Phase 6 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G /C= .000 G= .0" G= .0" G= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" Y +R= .0" OFF= .0% OFF= .0% OFF= .0% C= 60 sec G= 52.0 sec = 86.7% Y= 8.0 sec = 13.3% Ped= .0 sec = .0% 004 9 .w...•+.0 ...iwuw...ia['+ - ....Y « faY.i�YIYG.nY1.. . z Z ' W J U. O O` CO U- u) W W Z: W O ' co ▪ Q z �-. E- a z i- . � � t".:1 W W U LLi z. O •Z i .r• HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Center For Microcomputers In Transportation University of Florida 512 Weil Hall Gainesville, FL 32611 -2083 Ph: (904) 392 -0378 Streets: (N -S) Southcenter Pkwy (E -W) Site Access Major Street Direction NS Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min) Analyst Date of Analysis 4/25/97 Other Information Future 2001 Conditions Two -way Stop - controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop /Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's ( %) SU /RV's ( %) CV's ( %) PCE's Northbound L T R 0 2 < 0 N 1205 19 .95 .95 0 1 .10 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Maneuver Gap (tg) Left Turn Major Road Right Turn Minor Road Through Traffic Minor Road Left Turn Minor Road Queuing Comments The level of service analysis indicates that some queuing will take place. On site it will amount to not more than a single vehicle since the 95 percent probability queue length is computed to be 0.2 vehicles which can be rounded up to one (1). In the southbound 2 -way, left turn lane the LOS is at 'C' and the 95 percent probability queue length is computed to be 0.0 vehicles which, for a worst case, can be also rounded up to one (1) although for the majority of the time there will be no vehicles waiting. Southbound L -- - T -- - R 1 2 0 15 .95 501 .95 0 N Eastbound L -- - T -- - R 0 0 0 OTBK- P5.HCO Page 1 z -J0 0 N 0 ! w Westbound L T R W 0 0 > 1 < 0 2 . 5 0 9 co 3 .95 .955 _ .95 i- 0 Z 1.10 1.10 1.10 D O N 0 H W W IL o.. Follow -up � v Time (tf) O F- 5.50 2.10 5.50 2.60 6.50 3.30 7.00 3.40 r L HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c Worksheet for TWSC Intersection Step 1: RT from Minor Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: Step 2: LT from Major Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Movement Capacity: (pcph) Prob. of Queue -Free State: Step 3: TH from Minor Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1821 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 94 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.95 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 89 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 .Step 4: LT from Minor Street Conflicting Flows: (vph) Potential Capacity: (pcph) Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: Adjusted Impedance Factor: Capacity. Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements Movement Capacity: (pcph) SB L 18 349 WB ; EB 644 653 653 0.98 1 288 349 349 0.95 SB NB WB EB 1 821 WB EB 73 0.95 0.95 0.95 69 Intersection Performance Summary OTBK- P5.HCO Page 2 Avg. 95% Flow. Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap • Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec /veh) (veh) (sec /veh) WB L 6 69 > WB T 0 89 > 156 25.7 0.2 D 25.7 WB R 10 653 > 10.9 0.0 C 0.3 Intersection Delay = 0.3 sec /veh 51 . r L� .'S.Ii7P zAtg�,.�i7,••S:(1154a :i %AIVI UYak, ,+'�F,7}Z'' 4:J YAI�C+'C�il I7oW `�.Yid'a.0 ` ' A, , 'a� .• - - : ,.., , ., • ,rn._r�- r,, r, ^t Ci� rx4F5 x � ; Nk '�3i�+}? .' LG/' i. u:f.,. §#iili+GM �S�fU3�n C DATE: City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Public Works Ross A. Earnst, P. E., Director July 17, 1997 PROJECT NAME: Outback Steak House PERMIT NO.: D97 -0180 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer at (206) 433 -0179, if you have any questions regarding the following comments. 1) National Geodetic Vertical Datum (1929) shall be used as the vertical reference. No vertical datum is indicated on the plan. A FEMA approved benchmark shall be utilized. 2) Verify Southcenter Parkway right -of -way. Label the centerline shown on the plan. Is the identified centerline the street centerline or the right -of -way centerline? The west property line is shown incorrectly. 3) Location for the irrigation water line tap and size of the irrigation water meter on the landscape plans don't match the civil drawings. Sheet L2 (landscape Irrigation Plan) shows a new irrigation 1" deduct meter tapped of the existing water meter on Southcenter Parkway. Sheet C3 shows a 1 1/2" irrigation water meter on the south side of the proposed building. Specify size and type of the irrigation water meter (deduct water meter or water only water meter). 4) Storm drainage pipe between catch basin #5 and catch basin #6 is specified as 12" on sheet C1 but sheet C3 shows the same pipe as 6 ". 5) On sheets C2 and C3 clarify where does storm drainage from the existing catch basin type II - 48" diameter (rim elevation = 27.64) connects to. Show existing storm drainage system on Southcenter Parkway. 6) Show the domestic water service line from the proposed water meter to the building. Specify pipe material, type of pipe bedding and backfill materials (include percent compaction). The proposed building needs to be protected by a reduced pressure device after the water meter. 7) Cross- reference mechanical plans sheet number for double detector check valve assembly (DDCVA) and the fire line service. Specify the pipe size on the plans. • 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 433 -0179 • Fax (206) 431.3665 f ' C 8) Specify size of thet "�'.ase interceptor and cross - reference the appropriate sheets of mechanical plans. Label sewer pipe size leading to and from the grease interceptor. Verify sewer pipe size between the 6" clean -out and sanitary sewer man hole #1. Sheet C1 calls for 6" sanitary side sewer and sheet C3 shows the same pipe as 8" sanitary sewer man hole #1 shows INV. in as 6 ". 9) Show roof drains and foundation drains on the site plan and how they connect to the proposed storm drainage system. z w re 2 O 0: U U. W = ' U) ti. wO J : z a F-. w. 13) Show a cross - section detail of the sanitary sewer casing. g z D. w 14) Clarify the 2.0' overhang on "monolithic curb and sidewalk, ",ECC /Pavement 0. Section" and on both sides of the pavement cross - section on sheet C4. What type of , is it? ° overhang g wa • U 15) Show sanitary side sewer profile all the way to the clean -out. Sanitary sewer L ! - o; manhole is different on plan Sheet C3 and profile on sheet C4 al to U =• O ~ 10) Specify size of the existing storm drainage pipe between catch basin #4 and existing catch basin not found in the field. The existing catch basin not found in the field shall be raised to grade. 11) Is the coalescing plate oil water separators invert in and invert out the same. If yes, please indicate which way the storm sewer is flowing and what section of the parking lot is being treated. 12) Revise "CAUTION!!!" note on sheet C -3 to include the existing water main. Also label the size and location of the above water main. 16) PVC pipe material is not allowed for the storm sewer. Revise flow splitter catch basin and call out installation on sheet C4. 17) Access and pedestrian connection during construction shall be addressed. Describe the plans for the southern driveway during construction. An alternative access plan needs to be provided based on apparent closure of the southern driveway. This alternate access will require a separate street use permit from Public Works. Pedestrian access shall be available at all times across the southern driveway. 18) Show a roadway pavement patching and repair detail for the sanitary sewer crossing. 19) Show traffic lanes on Southcenter Parkway. Two southbound traffic lanes on Southcenter Parkway might be lost during the boring operations for the sanitary sewer installation. Night time work from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. will be allowed for boring work in the right -of -way. For potholing operations in the northbound direction, the standard hours of 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. shall be used. Pedestrian connection shall be unrestrained at all times. Only one northbound lane may be closed at any given time. During the non- . Vg4'k Lt2.j. 1 d�i Giix!il' ?� iii2kS , R:iP.4:4k24 , ii' .n'°oK lbit, working hours, the pit(s, fall be covered with a steel plate arLu covered with cold mix asphalt. 20) Applicant shall submit a traffic control plan to Public Works for approval ten days prior to the commencement of any work within the City right -of -way. 21) Sanitary sewer crossing design and construction shall include a geotechnical evaluation of existing conditions (see attached reports by RZA dated 7/10/88 and 7/29 /88) and provide any additional boring /geotechnical information to satisfy the design and construction requirements. The geotechnical engineer shall make final determination that the design satisfies the construction requirements. 22) Only an outside drop (if needed) can be utilized inside the existing sewer manhole for the proposed sewer. An inside drop will not be allowed. 23) The Traffic Impact Analysis that was prepared by Christopher Brown and Associates, dated April 24, 1997, needs to be revised to include projected horizon year 2010. The April 24, 1997 report calls for 2001. The revised Traffic Impact Analysis shall also include traffic mitigations per attached Mitigation Proportionate Fair Share Cost information. July 16, 1997 Merrick D. Lentz 1800 136th Place NE, Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION RE: Application for Binding Site Improvement Plan ( #L97 -0036) Outback Steakhouse Restaurant Dear Mr. Lentz Your application for a Binding Site Improvement for the Outback Steakhouse Restaurant, at 17510 Southcenter Parkway has been found incomplete on July 16,1997. The following items are missing from your application: a. Per Binding Site Improvement Plan Application Checklist, a copy of all recorded easement agreements, identified on the proposed plan with appropriate recording numbers. �, �� �� "IP b. Per TMC 17.16.030, the plan must identify the location and dimensions of all existing and o P \Z \\ proposed utilities c y This determination of Incomplete Application does not preclude the City to request further revisions to your proposal to insure that it meets the substantive requirements of the zoning code and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Once your application has been found complete, your application will be routed to appropriate departments for internal review, and any revision comments made back to you within 21 days. If you have any questions about the missing items, please contact me as planner -in- charge of your project at 431 -3673. Sincerely, Alexa Berlow Associate Planner • encl. cc: Reviewing City Departments 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 fikrr ;.�i�fiY's':rd rr en r:»[:wa V.i: ';; '+•,'::':: :'2544e tir i4Ott.:dci'r*rra.:: t�v`: trae,�ea�tfih.. >xf Date: 26- Jun -97 16:39:44 From: CELIA (CELIA SQUARE) To: ARLINE,BETTY,BEV, CATHY, CHRIS- CARLSON, CHRIS- COLLINS,CINDY,DOROTHY,HEINO -E, KIM,MMARY, MURRAY -M, PENNY, RHONDA, SHELLEY- O,SYLVIA- S,TRISH,ATTORNEY,AL -S, ALAN -D ,BOB -G, BRIAN ,CELIA,CHRISTY,DON,DOUG,DUANE ,EVIE- KAREN,JACK,JANE,JOANNA, JOHN - M,KEEFE- T,KELCIE,KROWS- R,LUCY, PAT, PHIL,RANDY,ROBIN,ROSS- E,ROSS -H, STACIA,STEVE, TED- FREEMIRE ,VIKI,WALDNER- R,WESTBY -C Subject: DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR RECORDING Message -id: 519BB23301000000 Application -name: MHS Re- sent -by: STEVE; on 27-Jun-97 17:09:00 Celia YOUR ATTENTION PLEASE I I I I King County has returned several documents to us because the 1 inch margins on pages following the first page were obstructed with signatures, page numbers, footers, notary stamps, etc. PLEASE NOTE: ALL PAGES AFTER PAGE ONE MUST HAVE ONE INCH MARGINS - -TOP, BOTTOM, AND BOTH SIDES OF DOCUMENTS. Margins must be 1" and COMPLETELY CLEAR of any type of markings -- even signatures cannot invade the one inch sacred margin. If your documents do not comply with these King County standards, you may as well keep the document in your office because King County WILL NOT record them. As a result of our "non- compliance," each document that was returned to us will have to be reduced in size. This means we will have to record copies that might not be as legible and our file copy will not be an original. A REMINDER OF THE GUIDELINES: 3 INCH TOP MARGIN AND 1 INCH MARGINS ON SIDES AND BOTTOM OF FIRST PAGE. 1 INCH "CLEAR" MARGINS ON ALL SIDES OF REMAINING PAGES. Please call me if you need further explanation. Thank you for your cooperation. • a greater sense of responsibility for property maintenance by clearly differentiating between public and private property through public street improvements that clearly demarcate public and private land. • a better appearance of the Highway by undergrounding of major utilities, and requiring undergrounding for private utility connections. z a • decreased 'visual noise' in the corridor by supporting the amortization of non - conforming signs in the ~ z corridor, and the removal of illegal signs. ce 6 I • improved appearance of the corridor by continuing to support privately initiated clean -up programs. v 0 cn • improved comfort of transit facilities along the corridor by initiating an improvement project with the w = ; Metropolitan King County Department of Transit. co w O :. • a decrease in the appearance of an automobile- dominated landscape by providing raised curbs, encouraging driveway consolidation, and requiring minimum driveway widths through street improvements, 4 a design guidelines, and public works standards. N �, = d: The Pacific Highway Design Manual translates the desired physical character for Pacific Highway into design review I- i criteria and design review guidelines that will guide property owners, developers, engineers, architects, landscape z architects, City staff and the City's Board of Architectural Review. In conjunction with Pacific Highway guidelines z O are modifications to City development standards to create incentives and to support the desired physical and w w functional character for the area. (The Manual is available to readers as a separate document, please request a p copy) 0 to (31— I nfrastructure o , A significant capital investment is recommended to bring this area up to a level commensurate with other areas of z . the City and with other commercial and housing areas in the region with whom the community would like to see t u it compete. For a city of 15,000 residents and 8 square miles, Tukwila has a considerable annual budget. Its F- 1997 budget expenditure will be over $23.5 million. Within the last six years, it spent over $54.5 million on z capital construction costs; 73% of that amount was from City funds and the remainder from grant and developer contributions. A phased upgrade of the infrastructure on Pacific Highway and on adjacent streets to an urban level is recommended. Incorporated into the street reconstruction plans are safety, mobility, and utility upgrades for storm water, water, sanitary sewer and fire hydrant infrastructure that may not meet current City standards. As important as providing safe infrastructure is the integration of the design of the street and streetscape improvements with the development character envisioned for the surrounding businesses and residential areas. The Conceptual Streetscape Plan Critical to the overall success of the area is the street's ability to function effectively by providing a safe circulation system for pedestrians and vehicles; by allowing vehicular access to businesses; by providing a civic and social environment for residents and the area's commercial patrons; and by maintaining circulation efficiency for the state highway system. Recognition of these multiple roles has led to a street and streetscape concept that calls for: • Four through lanes and one two -way turning lane; • Curb, gutter, landscaping and sidewalks; • On- street parking in specific locations; • Lighting improvements and undergrounding of overhead utilites; and Page 23 06/25/1997 08:58 2067477149 MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT CMA PAGE 01 DATE: JVIJE 25,11 TO: C. of iuK.l..► ►LA ATTN: • A t.ex for?-Lo z FAX NO: 431 - 31otb�" SUBJECT: car TP J Ansr . g►NOtt Ire. Reinl FROM:. e•ft ..loan?. MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT 1800 - 136th Place N. E., Suite 100 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone: (206) 747 -3177 FAX: (206) 747 -7149 �JE AfPuPO F - rom SW 00.4 SrrE imegoVernew p o ( . # LA1 0031) kr - rl-!e -rvme I ur'J' T w . 4 t -ale. 1k- - Awl or - nit eapofJse ?o ec"11tew OetzuWereletZt AND no N D NJLWDE 04E W 1 - We AMIOATiarJ . ( 06C.10612 't'v rk on•S E /}w NAT ‘ Artb AM MokosA IT W I(rj4 rds Go . Gb 1 NEB) - , 51�J '9' Lot' et), D d. C ii-i 1 0# 1 ( ) t<�-tCE ? Off ACA - r oN 4PP1 5 To 6€ i S T G arb Fryi.J 0 - w 41, 'feu - rAYrE 20 . X94 -t'S To Lorh IFtarn �.�'r eom PtetJ . 5, o CAI 'T1 -'1'S 6E pvpiE gc1 t.e.etc. wE /tee CoN 'we° "f I-J i LoN STAX:ri CA+J'T nehrr Ut tk, MI 5 15 A9PVc J V, 0 Woixt0 Lcr,E To Ro ngtrvin44 cdE -tom Hula Way rte T1tt bra• fix. Ler rnn 41111.1 tf `ti`eE' 15 SO/1+er-Inm4 I . tipple -1' oe. S* o a a . 113firlt Yak RECEIVED J UN 2 5 1997 DEV�EL OP`MENT PAGE 1 OF .PAGES. .St1 6 . : r+ip2i? Sri , ia43RI:zaP.F„SF3 P- 1:YtitM ia9M:L'barY' ifi`�4i".4q'.. , Y{ rnv.n.anr+r�x i:`•A�. �irrixvaciai+a,.- ..,..- c 06/25/1997 08:58 206747714 . cK ... . • . • . LENTZ ARC _P ECT' • • Response :to . .... V[RQt:9!tr2 CMA 1 - `136tH' Place'N,E:; Suite.100 Bellevue, Velligaugtoa -98005 • 206!747- 317 ?. VA:1C;06/747 -7149 • • OUTBACK STEAROUS RESTAURANT ' ' • • '. BINDING' SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN .: • Permit Number •L97- •0036 • .• June 24,1997 • PAGE 02 • ,1.•The•Binding Site Improvement Plan defines two parcels that will °comply •wi :allknown : • applicable: regulations affecting the- land, including zoning, health;: building, ;fir and.gafet ' : ' . • : and•the like: ' • • 2. •The access from the • parcels to the public roads is: existing. and as such provides . ...:, .' . adequate :access•from each parcel to the public.road :as •well as effective cross:-'Circulation: ••; • • • between the two : parcels. , The.ownership• of both parcels will •remain;with S•outhcentor : ; • . . • s " ' • Motor Hotel Ltd : is•na change the existing. conditions• prior rior•. to• this:'' ;• • ' �; } ATTACHMENT TO OL °`ACK STEAKHOUSE BINDING SI PLAN APPLICATION CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON EXISTING PARCEL PARCEL II OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 77 -51 -55 (REVISED) RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7904180861, A REVISION OF SHORT PLAT NO. 77 -51 RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7710130634; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA FOR SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8005080433, SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. NEW PARCEL "A" THAT PORTION OF PARCEL II OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 77 -51 -55 (REVISED) RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7904180861, A REVISION OF SHORT PLAT NO. 77 -51 RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7710130634, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL II; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 424.92 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING IN A WESTERLY DIRECTION ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 199.96 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA FOR SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8005080433; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 211.53 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL H A DISTANCE OF 201.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF PARCEL H A DISTANCE OF 211.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. NEW PARCEL "B" PARCEL II OF CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. 77 -51 -55 (REVISED) RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7904180861, A REVISION OF SHORT PLAT NO. 77 -51 RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 7710130634; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA FOR SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8005080433. AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL II; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF A DISTANCE OF 424.92 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING IN A WESTERLY DIRECTION ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 199.96 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THAT CERTAIN TRACT CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA FOR SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 8005080433; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 211.53 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF PARCEL II A DISTANCE OF 201.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF PARCEL H A DISTANCE OF 211.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO AND TOGETHER WITH EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 2 It 1997 PERMIT CENTER Z a =- w et 2 0 W I J N LL WO 2 LL Q . co = W H =. Z � I- O '. Z f- n p` U O — . F- V_ IL O .. Z U �' O z fi DECLARATION: AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP Know all men by these presents that we, the undersigned, owner(s) in fee simple of the land herein described do hereby make a boundary line adjustment. The undersigned further declare this boundary line adjustment to be the graphic representation of said boundary line adjustment and the same is made with the free consent and in accordance with the desire of the owner(s). In witness whereof we have set our hands and se s. t ouths�:� -r Mot •r H� ►1. , �. Y: s, .nc. , � Name: By: Name: r &2 . G/PL 4 Name: Name: Name: STATE OF N -1 ZMN. Countyof King /1J I d) /8 On this day personally appeared before L 3-O \ Y P Y PP a me � -�I� to me known to be the individual described in and who exec�fted the within and foregoing instrument, _ 9 9 and acknowledge that SH signed the same as /f fee and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this o� - day of 31m_ , 19 STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King Signature: Name as commissione Title: On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledge that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of BLAAP.DOC 8/5/96 z W . u6 JU ; U 0 : N o. CO z ' • LL W O g 5 :. LL ', �w M. Z I-0 Z F- L u U0 O co a f- w uj LL z . My appointment exp � & cn O Name: Name: Name: ,19 Partner .. v.i.�....'.�;.c••:^ }' ?. +_. t +— ai,:>.hx:.�v:,ar'.tia ��. 3d+` Tin' K�N�t'+. 3! �;? i�: tui�.:; i;' xi%? ��cYJ ^..n�:+'sri�v''9;:e;<:f�x�Y 404..fszF r. rt,ed3:. tzYZua rnr; za& wi kcat?A'k30*@ 'i% rte!: Signature: Name as commissioned: Title: My appointment expires: RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 2 4 1997 PERMIT CENTER _ .. : -r. t-.,i:c �� .u::; ,a* _ter.,, ...�,;.. .,�� {: e�., �.: i'••.;.',;.i.,.. �.�: \:�'; <o `'f �t+� n� °.:�:z�, �.,!'Ff.`i?'F�ta�i:`4ic�nl�)�2 ..i. .0 , .� .. 1�n(`. i. !.. ,.,r'.5.....tT. 1'. Y' N. A•:?: t1 al3�, R. n�t3iv7. �i�:. �Nt bi1' i:.' iiS: cb'. SY..` aa c�3a4w. r�. c�. �: �r '1'�':rt�,.o�:�'.:f,� >.F'k�4mYV . �:'.+ G�.: eK r��' fa :..�, «.�c.,.!'.ri•.G'rRC;H�'s.� .. �n. s��in."��rS....�.�r::�.r.,...�c �.'S ,:a� LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS (Attach additional sheets if necessary): BEFORE THE ADJUSTMENT: SEE ATTACHED AFTER THE ADJUSTMENT: SEE ATTACHED BLAAP.DOC 7/3/96 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT /LOT CONSOLIDATION &'ITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON FILE NO. Filed for record at the request of: Name APPROVAL Department of Community Development: Examined and approved this day of , 19 Director, Dept. of Community Development Department of Public Works: Examined and approved this day of Director, Department of Public Works Return to: Dept. of Community Development Planning Division City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Page ,19 of -- ;*IVED OITY OF TUKWILA JUN 241997 PEr or OENTER Z; . `J '0 0'; CI; ' .CO w • w =; J ~; N LL•• u i ti. �.I. • ..x• ? • 0' . Z CIJ .2 D't ; CO; O w ir • Z. U z , :-� MAP (Attach on separate sheet if necess.., y) SEE ATTACHED 18" x 24" SITE PLAN Land Surveyor's Certificate: BINDING SITE PLAN This SaiN XXXitxxA4j10U tx) fUl ikirX correctly represents a survey* made by me or under my direction in conformance with the requirements of appropriate State statute. Name: JOHN W. BECKER Map on File in Vault Direction: Scale: Stamp: Date: 12 JUNE 1997 Certificate No. P.L.S. 13670 *Many Boundary Line Adjustments and all lot consolidations do not Page of require a survey. BLAAP.DOC 8/5/96 CITY OF RECEIVED JUN 2 4 1997 PERMIY CENTER RECVE CITY OF Tl1I 3UN2 PERMIT C D. PARCELS: A B C D ZONING DISTRICT T . U . C . T . U . C . EXISTING USE PARKING HOTEL PROPOSED USE RESTAURANT HOTEL PROPOSED LOT SIZE 42495 s.f. 291927 s.f. DATE OF LAST PLAT: B.L.A. 7 9 0 418 0 8 61 IL. d1 _1 . LL CITY O TIJKCWIIA CITY OF - `UKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT OR LOT CONSOLIDATION (P -BLA) APPLICATION FOR.STAFF'USE .ONLY` Planner:`:;: Num pplication :Complete ate ;`Application "Incomplete (Dat File`Num Project Flie #: Other File Other File #: I. PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: OUTBACK STEAKHOUSE B. LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: (give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection; if proposal applies to several properties, list the streets bounding the area.) ADDRESS: • fl S i O So T r� ia-- P ASSESORS PARCEL NO.: 262304-9127 Quarter: NW Section: 26 Township: 23 Range: 4 E (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) NAME: MERRICK D. LENTZ ADDRESS: 1800 136th PLACE N.E., SUITE 100 BELLEVUE, WA 98005 PHONE: SIGNATURE: .1 ( 20 747 -31 FAX (206) 747 -7149 DATE: 6/2/g7 ,D Js1 2 Li 1997 PERMIT CENTER 7 t } l' r '; :'1 ' « s GV t as�+sw 4i tt,° t iS YiGii ��»f i' " k S IWI is APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Department. Please contact the Department if you feel certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. The initial application materials allow starting project review and vesting the applicant's rights. However, they in no way limit the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. Department staff are available to answer questions about application materials at (206) 431 -3670. APPLICATION FORMS: m Application Checklist Application Form (4 copies) and $200 non - refundable fee (no fee for Lot Consolidation) Legal Description (existing and proposed) Page (4 copies) Affidavit of Ownership Page Map of Boundary Line Adjustment or Lot Consolidation (4 copies) APRD application (if your site has a wetland, stream, or their buffers, or a Class 2 or higher slope) The map should be a scaled drawing on paper no larger than 8 -1/2" by 14" (unless otherwise approved) and should include the following elements: Giq 1'4 ria BLAAP.DOC 1/16/97 CITY OF --` JKWILA BOUNDARY LINE Department of Community Development ADJUSTMENT OR LOT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 CONSOLIDATION Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 CK IST WITH YOU APP, LICATI A survey of the site may be required if that level of detail is needed to ensure zoning standards are met. Northpoint, scale and date. Dashed lines showing location of existing lot line(s) and solid lines showing proposed lot line locations. Location and dimensions of all easements existing and proposed. Means of access to each lot, including width, name and condition of adjacent streets. Dimensions of all lines and total lot or parcel sizes. Mean lot width of all residential lots. Existing contours at two -foot intervals. (This may be waived if no portion of subject property exceeds grades of 20 %.) Location of septic tank drain field or sewer lines and water mains. Existing structures and distance to existing and proposed property lines. Existing trees over 4" in diameter by species. Parking and circulation plan for affected lots. Parking calculations for affected lots. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA DU 2 1 1 1997 PERMIT CENTER z re w J O U O to O CO W W = w d zF. I— O z I- U � O D- 0 I— w w . H — `Io U 0 z 44,5 44410 `d',Itk"c':1 qi, t ii jleri. ".&41£1Cl Aci'Fo' i va: `, 4.",1 Sikhs FlrM t ' G44, ti OTHER REQUIREMENTS (4 pies): Response to Boundary Line Adjustment review criteria (see first page). Any sensitive areas studies required by TMC 18.45. A list of any existing environmental documents known to the applicant that evaluate any aspect of the proposed project. A list of any permits or decisions applicable to the development proposal that have been obtained prior to filing the application or that are pending before the City or any other governmental entity. A storm water design which meets the requirements set forth in the Surface Water Design Manual if required by TMC 16.54.060(d). Proof that the lots are recognized as separate lots pursuant to the provisions of TMC Title 17 and RCW ch. 58.17. BLAAP.DOC 1/16/97 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 2 I; 1997 PERMIT CENTER } x - Parcel (Lot) 1A: Parcel (Lot) 1B: Parcel (Lot) 2A: Parcel (Lot) 2B: Owner(s) signature(s) (print) ,owners of the following described tract(s) of land; See attached legal description. See attached legal description. See attached legal description. See attached legal description. des 1, , / '6 I;re wl/' f JU L.6 )+A I Acrrd 13. JOINT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Notice is hereby given that / iG , {1477 ei do hereby establish this Agreement and convey unto all present and future owners, their heirs and assigns, of all or any of the foregoing described tract(s) of land, the maintenance of the easement(s) granted and conveyed in Tukwila Short Subdivision # L95 -0059 described below. 1. Sewer Line: It is agreed that the cost of any repair or maintenance for the 6 inch sewer line shell be the joint responsibility of all parties except Lot 2B. Water Line: It is agreed that it shall be the responsibility of all parties except Lot 2B to pay the cost of any repair or maintenance of the main water line. 3. Access Roadway: It is agreed that it shell be the joint responsibility of all parties to pay the cost of any repair or maintenance of the access roadway. 4. Storm Drainage For Roadway: It is agreed that it shell be the joint responsibility of all parties to pay the cost and maintenance of storm drainage for roadway. This Agreement shall be binding upon all present and future owners of the parcels created under the aforementioned document. Date 5- /3 s -- /3 -q6 x. +:;-i : .'.ti.�:�xS a. rli' J�= tX�'. Ke1i':'( h; h 'C- fi.m�;A�"vld:i��.l'.'ti .. �c &'h.. �' iritrklia tY ?i�'+i�kt�'aik:tiejs�i.'nU�Aiw�� :4..h5 +S:�Ri+k 1 }S`,t•.f?'r�'tikiiY..a14" dii:� "�r'.�"`,1%er: 3tr ,'kedmi x '.:44 c.' efg MAY 1 3 1996 C�Tr• ••L.rl,:al I�11c Fr• AdJ FND. 4 CONC. MON. W/ 1 1/2" B.C. ..• / .-• , A 11 %III 11 .1 Cnnr, z 2 _10 0 O N w = J H; W O g J; = a: W . z O z � 2 D o. O 0 I— ID w W O : Z' U O ~' z } ■ File: MINIS Smm Drawing# *mow ADDITION - TO EXISTS PLANTER EXISTS PARKING STALLS TO BE QED 3y ST'6- PLANTER AND VEGETATION TO BE REMOVED LIGHT POLE TO - - EE TYP. 3 LOG. TRASH ENGL E-- EXISTING SIDEWALK — EX ST'S POWER VAULT l F 'r E " PLA TER T. g I IN P TE 51Sis� LINE Or OVERHANG ABOVE COVERED WALKMYAY NEW ACCESSIBLE PARKING' STALL, TYP. 3 LOG. AIN 5LD6 `...... ENTRY NEM PLANTER TYP. SHADED AREAS NEW SIDEWALK - EXISTINS PARKINS B/ NO.GHANAE, B CGEPT -. AS NOTED OTHERWISE SUITMS EXISTING PARKING TO. REMAIN eTYP) ■ EXISTS G.B. EXISTS HYDRANT S 1890 - 198th P1 Bellevue. 208/747 -■8177 PROJECT NAME u,_ EXISTS LT. POLE TO REMAIN NEW ADDITION. TO EXISTS PLANER HEM PLANTER —EA. SIDE OF DUMPSTER 5' TALL 1.40 011) FENCE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE EXISTS HYDRAN EXISTING TREE AND PLANTER. TO REMAIN 00I -1 l ET13EE WEST M. SITE P1-AN NORTH SCALE: 1 "1.20' -0" APPROVED SUBJECT TO ORDINANCE MAY 1 9 1997 'VAR A°. BUC HERLTH O. ECEIVED CITY R of TUKWIL JUN 0 91997 PERMIT CENTER BOUT IC'ENTER PAR WAY 111KWLA, WA DRAIF NG TI 611111 P ty DATE NovErtESEl4 12, 19cs0t, DRAWN BY ML CHECKED BY REVISIONS ?gm- 0 lialigMBMWE itd4NSINingigi 'Ws IMMINIUMNIE ..iz.ININIIMINIMWEMVEMEMMEIREE mann annigain 0 VW os , 70 0 4 X 2 fill OVORIN,O.to. 4 13:1§ , LoRXIE.48folifLIFANCN,T • FR SUPPLY I " STA,TION . CO2 FILL I L 54ATIN6 101 smaern46: LoOte.e: Dims*, ECIUFNENT / SEATIN6 PLAN AL 14 220 10 ' I. OONTRAGTOK,',TO 'WOE itmkot 41 5. WALL SAR ALL SECt -1N rASS INON4 ANT, SACK -KITOSEN MALL TO St LtrT OW' ihOOtSSMACK Or 14011...pJNO EtPM 11.. SAK F.6tutp1eNT HAS SE4S1 iNSTALLSO. 4.8EMINPIS TO St 91.J5Pt141;e2 -FROM 2, 00t4.110 OOOKI ATM aft"' 4 Pirr) A 440 _ 9ur9 9 *°P 1 'EGO rktAtter vtap. semm SYSTEM 1N 41m „ INTO KJ ' CITY OF ILA JUN 0 9 1997 PERMIT CENTER MER ARC IT EC _..4.0 1800 - 188th Plop* N.S., Se118vue,_W -3 808/147177 PROJECT NAME SOUTHCMER PARKWAY TLEWLA, WA DRAWING TITLE IEGUltemiNT "SATIN* PLAN 1111■ ■ ,. ■ ■■■COmC� ` ■■ O■iOO ■ ■OM ■Mie ■NCM■ 211 0.0 CCC ■C ■t■ ■■ C�■■■■■■ ■O ■■ ■CCONCC� 1 ®C ■■ C ■ ■ ■CICI ■ CC ■CO ■ ■CC■COOO■ ■i■ ■■ QOM Q OMEMINIMMEMMEN ECM M O x:00 = CI MBLEQa INFO 10= 0110 g90 3:000 00000 1iuIIIIIIuIII Illuhlin 1 III Illinflu111 MOM uu HININIMINI ���iiii i� � � ���■�� �� � N� uuuui r�n w1i��� hhh 11111 1 11111 111 iii i� ��,�i i i �i���n����� �111611111111011 =, i � N �i � � i � � � H111111111 ■ ■■■■■■. . ■ ■■■■■■ ■■■ ■ ■■M ■■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■. ■ ■■■ ■ m ■ ■■.■■�..■ IN gun 711 illem g mionomemommom Tip mg ill 1 III mummilimin Olin 111 III I MI 1 010011O00111 11 1 ill 11 ill II ill I li 11111E1011 III KM I Ilim n1111 1111111 III CO 100 imam 110. I III 111111 ICI V III 0 7011 0■■r■O 1 011111010 1;1 11 InOdNuICIoaNIN NIONCICONININNO aINuCIIMOnocI D0 IIIIALIIICC9 000 OU00001A 0 -d: 8 4 - ‘V ' D 4 < , 0 tk --''''''41 .f1 ranoconnnum anommuntainommono moo nnnooll 11 1111111111111111 1111111111111111 1911111111111111 1111111 AIII 11111011111 N11111110 Iiii 11111111111111 1111111 z. ANIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII 11111 10111100001110111111 111•1•1111 PIN 111101111011111110 111111. 11111011011111110111 IMINNINION 0101 1011111111111101 1111110 011111111101 I 11111101 11111111111 111111 00 i4010000 0 0000000100010000000. 0 111111 II . W m a I IO" 01101 rill mma I 111111111111111111 NO I NINIM11111101r1011 0 111111111 I 111141111111111111 IN 1111111111111110 NM MIONINNINNININIMONNUNINININNIN NI ONNINIMINTIONOIrtN01 III filtlINNINNINNINSINNINNIUMININNI1 111111111WW n 111 INNO ti EIEMIMIIIIIIIIIMINIIIIMMIIIMICUIMMIIIIIINIIIIM till uunuuu 113111111111111111611 11115111171E11111111111111 IA Milli : imilinpuillimi plow oggilimiliiiiimuni 111111 1111111N1111111111111 11111011 ill1111111111111111 IF 1111111 _ 111111 H:iII Immemssmommiti unsei IN OCINICINICONINIMItIBIZ ,INOOVNOCINCONIMOCI i1511Wililiiii rit;nnrinc. t OICIOONNOOOO N11111111111 01211001011111 i 011 ,11101MO =arm NON ON INIONNINIMINNINI 111 111.01 ONINVOIN1111110• Ill • NO . mormiccommico In OW 11111.10011.11 II 01:00 C000 OR 40 WI X333 OUTSIDE SCALE: 3/4" 's I'-0" 2X6 TRIM 7 S "x &" COLUMN ' sm■samir w 2 "x12" CEDAR BASE 36 - aJ B RAKE: 1x4 CAP 1800 - 136th Place =N.Y., Suite 1 Bellevue, Washington 98005 206/747 -3177 FAX 206/747 - 7140 REGISTERED RICK E LE Z STATE OF WASHINGTDR PROJECT NAME lIY ;2 ;'7 4 {u'I _. Sr° '; AS , i c U 6X6 COLUMN ' WC) �Y' a ELEVATION — c ,lL.) ELEVATI c °u,M"1 I_ I J� 2X6 TRIM t ) CORNER BOARDS TYP. NOTE: PROVIDE RAIL ALONG OUTSIDE EDCsES OF PORCH THAT ARE NOT CONNECTED TO SIDEWALKS OR STAIRS. INSIDE OF 2x4 PORCH SEG TION — (RAIL? L L FOUNDATION PER STRICT. 2x2 A 5" O.C. PRESSURE TREATED 1r/2 " SO. STEEL TUBE AT APPROX. 4' -0" O.C. STEEL TUBE SUPPORT - EXP. -BOLT TO CONC. WEST ELEvAT ION EAST ELEVATION 'SCALE: 'a' = I' -.0" SCALE: = D�I1 -ol g0 bs5 CEDAR TRIM ) 6x6 PRESSURE TREATED POST Q SEGTION — (coL.UMN) SCALE. S• = 1'-0' • FOR DOOR 2 E-EAtLB 5E0 SHEET A - 9 FOUNDATION PER STRICT WOOD LOUVER GABLE VENT FINISH TO MATCH WOOD TRIM J 2x2 6 4" O.G. PRESSURE TREATED I!=" SO. STEEL TUBE AT APPROX. 4' -0" O.C. 2X6 TRIM d CORNER BOARDS TYP. BUILDING SIGN CALCULATIONS - EXPOSED BUILDING FACE AREA: 1565 S.F. MAX AREA ALLOWED: (004 x (1365 -500)) *25 = 54.5 5.F. PROPOSED SIGN AREA 52 SF. KEY TO EXTERIOR FINISHES L LOUISIANA PACIFIC SIDING; IxE. w/ DEVOE WONDER- SHIELD ACRYLIC LATEX, (GLOSS) COLOR 2H39F, NICKEL, 2 COATS OF FINISH OVER ONE COAT PRIMER 6" EXPOSURE ON SIDING (TYP) 2. WOOD -RIM,. PAINTED WITH DEVOE WONDER SHIELD ACRYLIC LATEX, (GLOSS) COLOR Ii.+2RP, TWO COATS OF FINISH OVER ONE COAT PRIMER 3. WOOD DOORS ! TRIM, WINDOW TRIM, STAIN AND VARNISH W/ MINIWAX STAIN 50/50 MIX OF GOLDEN OAK. AND PROVINCIAL w/ HIGH GLOSS SPAR VARNISH FINISH. 4. STANDING SEAM. METAL. MANSARD ROOFING. • AND ROOFING TRIM, BERRIDGE, PATINA GR.,- • 5. METAL DOORS AND FRAMES, GUTTERS 4 MISC. METALS, DEVOE WONDER SHIELD ACRYLIC LATEX, (GLOSS) COLOR' 2H39F," TWO COATS FINISH OVER ONE COAT OF METAL PRIMER VERIFY PRIMER TYPE WITH MANUF. FOR GALV. METAL SURFACES. METAL ROOFING METAL GABLE END FLASHING Ixb CONT. TRIM 1D4 BLOCKING 1x4 CONT. TRIM 2x12 CONT. FASCIA DETAIL - (GABLE TRIM) SCALE. 1 1/2" _ l' -0" 354 2X9 TRIM CORNER eCADS L 7 , FOUNDATION PER STRUC., r10 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: WOOD LOUVER, / GABLE VENT FINISH TO MATCH UJOOD TRIM SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: I/4" • LOUISIANA PACIFIC SIDING, lx8 w! DEVOE LLIONDER-SHIELD ACRYLIC LATEX (GLOSS) COLOR 21-139F, NICKEL, 2 COATS OF FINISH OVER ONE COAT PRIMER. 6 EXPOSURE ON SIDING (T•P) 2. UJOOLD TRIM, PAINTED WITH DEVOE WONDER SHIELD ACRYLIC LATEX, (GLOSS) COLOR 11-12131., TWO COATS OF FINISH OVER ONE COAT PRIMER 3. WOOD DOORS 4 TRIM, WINDOW TRIM, STAIN AND VARNISH w/ MINIWAX STAIN 50/50 MIX OF GOLDEN OAK AND PROVINCIAL w/ HIGH GLOSS SPAR VARNISH FINISI4 KE'r TO FINISH MATERIALS a--2X6 TRIM 4 CORNER BOARDS TYP. FOUNDATION PER STRUCT. 4. STANDING SEAM METAL MANSARD ROOFING AND ROOFING TRIM, BERRIDGE, PATINA GREEN 9. METAL DOORS AND FRAMES, GUTTERS MISC. METALS, DEVOE WONDER SHIELD ACRYLIC LATEX, (GLOSS) COLOR 2143SF, TWO COATS FINISH OVER ONE COAT Of METAL. PRIMER VERIFY PRIMER TYPE WITH MANUF. FOR GAL, METAL SURFACES. SEP 1 7 19'97 As No; — BTITEDKC?,DTiii , -5 1 7 1800 - 138th Place Nil., Salle 100 - Bellevue, Teehington.'98008 208/747-3177 - FAx 20074747140: , ... . . ..„.. . _ . . - _ SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKVALA, WA - ' DRAWING TITLE BUIL.DiNG BLEVATIO DATE MAY 23, DRAWN BY CSC-':, CHECKED BY . RECEPJEE V4' f < l i I SLOPE SLOPE n / / EZ� i-' M / I ( 1 �! a RI I DRAFTSTO P �/,-- \ PARAPET A WALL —3:12 SLOPED CRICKET I I MANSARD .1 �/ SLOPE I SLOPE 1/4 : ' i2 SLOPE 1....1.... A � — SLOPE .12 :12 > DRAFTSTOP i� ROOF DRAIN 4 < 1/4 : 12 < 1/ : 12 SLOPE OVERFLOW I i 1 F I J 3:12 SLOPED Q ' ` .A C. UNIT \ ' CRICKET v -;- -. T ILJ WALL � I r n Jl L - 1 + - FOR LOCATION ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT , 1 \ REFER MECHANICAL PLANS NS HATCH %, I RIDGE RIDGE ROOF ACCESS I 30"x30" y El CRICKET � �l ' Ij/' � 3 :12 SLOPED 1d2 \ I SLOPE - SLOPE 1 1 SLOPE •\ j � 4 i< < I/4 : 12 i < 1/4 : 12 i i :� A.G. UNIT -.. RIDGE.. i p : PARAPET - .. • ' WALL ' ' iii \� MANSARD ROOF DRAIN 4 OVERFLOW V r I E.P. N I SLOPE I2:I2 FOR LOCATION OF ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT - _ _ -- / REFER MECHANICAL PLANS . I--- — � - 1 -`\ F MAU . ' I • t SLOPE SLOPE SLOPE I SLOPE DRAFTSTOP SLOPE 12:12. RIDGE r CRICKET - - < 1/412 3:12 SLOPED < I /4: 12 A.G. UNIT. DRAFTETOP MANSARD • I E.F. R 1 ROOF DRAIN 4 ` 60' -O" MAXIMUM BETWEEN DRAFTSTOPS (TYPICAL) OVERFLOW \^ 4' ( / 1 - - 7 . ` DRAP^STOP GONST.. 1I i!2" 6W6 NA LED TG SIDE / OF TRUSS ONE SIDE) . 5Y� /` TO COVER ENTIRE AREA WITH <, YNAtLL I �` \ ` NO OPENINGS OR PENETRATIONS 1 PARAPET 7 7YPIGAL (3) PLACES I / �` �_._ z T e st W " ' r p l � PV V Q il – – — — — E \ I e SLOPE ■I )' � �I Q ry -- — — -- — \ Q za SLOPE ,- 1 j <. % - 1:12 9:12 ti1--01: ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3 /I6" = NORIN CITY OF TUKWILA APPROVED SEP 1 7 1997 AS E T[D BUr D1N D, OI•JN UNPUBLISHED WORK 01997 MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT MERRICK y9 NTZ RC IT CT 1800 - 198th Place N.B., . Suite 100 Bellevue, Weehington 98005 208/747 -3177 FAX 208/747 -7149 MERRICK • : LEN STATE OF WASHINGTON. 3549 PROJECT NAME OUTBACK STEA KHO USE SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA, WA DRAWING TITLE ROOF PLAN DATE - DRAINN BY CHECKED BY REVISIONS APRIL 21, 1991 JEI-1 A JEN, 0 -4 -91 , PER GO. TUKWILA COMMEN TO. 2 !? ' EXT. WALL (2) 256 TOP PLATE 4" DIA.OVE4FLOIN BESIDE DOMSPOUT 4• DIA. DOIAINSPOUT EXTERIOR CONCRETE SLAB- — SEE SITE PLAN FOUNDATION: REFER TO STRUCTURAL 6" DIA. TIGHT-LINE 12 ROOF CONSTRUCTION: FRAMING PER STRUCT., PLY)112. SHEATHING PER STRUCT , 50* BUILDING/ PAPER METAL ROOFING EXTERIOR NALL: 0515 SfINA toi/ 6" EXPOSED, 15* BUILDING PAPER, PLY/ND SHEATHING PER STRUCT., 2X6 STUDS 44 16" 0.G., R-1.1 BATT INSUL., 5/8 GJN.B FIRE BLOCKING R-i0 R16417 INSULATION SCALE: 1, 2° r-0 $ING - -PLY ROOFING FLY - V v LCUVERED WALL VB4TS FROMM, A MK NET N) CLEAR AREA OF 445 Srat 4 SPACE EGUALLY AROND INSIDE PPEER OF PARAPET MALL MC 5053 r •A" • IN j • 4 DIA. OVERPLO (3 LOCATIONS) , SINGLE-PLY ROOFING, 50. BUILDING PAPER. R-25 RI6ID INSUL., PLYAD SHEATHING PER STRIJOT. TOP PLAT ROOF 1 • 1 1,-1555-SEE STRICTURAL SUSPEINDED ACOUSTICAL TILE CEILING Pillow 01%0 4 CONG. FLOOR SLAB OVER 6 MIL VAPOR BARRIER WALL. SECTION 6 TOP PATE b • SUSPENDED AGOUSTICAL—f • • 1 TILE CEILING ROOF TRUSSES-SEE STRUCTURAL BUILDING SECTION A SCALE 1, = 1 SINGLE-PLY ROOFING, 30* euli_vit4s PAPER, R-25 RIGID INSUL., PLYiND. SHEATHING PER STRUGT. 154 PINE TRIM 156 V-JOINT PINE 256 BLOCKING AT 2 A.F.F. AT TABLES k4 BLOCKING 156 PINE BASE SEE ALTERNATE BASE DETAIL 5/A-6 4° CONC. FLOOR SLAB OVER 6 MIL. VAPOR BARRIER R-IO RIGID INSULATION //,\\ SINSLE-FLY ROCFM5 SINGLE-PLY' ROOFING SLOPE I/4 12 INSUL. GLAZING Yi./ 1/2" AIR SPACE EXTERIOR CONCRETE SLAB- SEE SITE PLAN • \ FOUNDATION REFER TO STRUCTURAL EXTERIOR NALL: CUB SIDING IN/ 6" EXPOSED, 15$ BUILDING PAPER. PLYND. SHEATHING PER STRUCT., 2.X6 STUDS * 16" 0.C., R-I4 BATT INSUL, 1 & 5/6" GAB. " 12 WALL SECTION scALE, J a A 1x4 RARING \ \ \ 15.5 (PAINTEPI—N NB V-JOINT PINE-‘ (STAIN N VARNISH;' \ \ ..— N2 BLOCKING N6 (PAINTED) Ix4 (PAINTE 2512 \ 1 - (PAINTED) CONT. 254 (PAINTED) SOFFIT DETAIL CONT. 5' ALUM_ VENT n i ROOF CAP 1: Aj WALE I 1/2 WALE. AILVAILIr VAILOPY ROOF CONSTRUCTION: FRAMING PER 5TRUCT., PLYAD. SHEATHING PER SMUG 50* BUILDING PAPER METAL ROOFING • C:31 SINGLE-PLY ROOMS , PBR T. LOWERED NALL VBITS PROVIDING A MR NET CLEAR AREA OF 495 50.15. 1 SPACE VENTS ECUALLY ARCARO INSIDE PERIMETER OF PARAPET YtALL IBC 5053 SINGLE-PLY ROOFING, 50 BUILDING PAPER, R-25 RIGID IN-SUL., PLYND. SHEATHING PER STRUCT. ROOF TRUSSES-SEE STRUCTURAL — ■GALV. DRIP I FLASHING , SUSPENDED ACOUSTICAL TILE CEILING 154 PINE TRIM 156 V-JOINT PINE SIDING 255 BLOCKING AT 2 A.F.F AT TABLES 1x4 BLOCKING 156 PINE BASE SEE ALTERNATE BASE DETAIL 5/A6 4° CONG. FLOOR SLAB OVER B MIL. VAPOR BARRIER 402-41. R-I0 RIGID INSULATION 3/a" SMOOTH FINISH PLYPID SOFFIT CONT. 5" ALUM. VENT SOFFIT DETAIL rT METAL ROOFING. GALV. DRIP FLASHING 152 BLOCKING b.cf, (PAINTED) 154 (PAINTED) 2512 (PAINTED) CONT. 154 (PAINTED) TO. B EXT lx5 FURRING CONTINUOUS 5 LONERS? KAU 14505 PROVIDING A MIN. NET CLEAR AREA CF 415 SOJN. 4 GAME VENTS EQUALLY AROUND MIRE PERIMETER OF PARAPET HALL. LEE 15053 156 V-JOINT SIDING (STAIN S VARNISH) 454 BRCKETS (SEE DETAIL A 4) HEADER-SEE ROOF CONSTRUCTION: FRAMING PER STRUGT., PLYAD. SHEATHING PER STRUCT., 30* BUILDING PAPER, METAL ROOFING HEADER-SEE STRUCTURAL INSUL. GLAZING VW 1/2" AIR SPACE CITY OF TUKWILA APPROVE5 SEP 1 7 1997 AS NOTED BUILL1N, L VISION EXTERIOR /NALL: 055 SIDING Yr.V B" EXPOSED, •.- 15# BUILDING PAPER, PLYPID. SHEATHING PER STRUCT., 2X6 STUDS S 16' 0.C., R-14 BATT INSUL., 5/5" GAB. EXTERIOR CONCRETE SLAB- 7 — SEE SITE PLAN 1 UNPUBLISHED RORK 01997 MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT, - MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITECT 1800 - 198th Place NE &Lite 100 Bellevue, 'Washington. 98005 208/747-3177 FAX 208/747-7149 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA, WA DRAWING TITLE BUILDING 4 WALL SECTIONS 4 ',ETA I LS DATE DRAWN BY JEI-4 CHECKED BY FOUNDATION: RECEIVED REFER TO STRUCTURODY OF TUKVVILA 1 13'37 PERMIT CENTER WALL ' SCALE : - MAY 23, 11 REVISIONS . • Z\ JEW, 8i4- PER C.O. TUKWILA CERAMIC TILE WAINSCOT (BOTH SIDES) %d" DURA ROCK BACKING FOR TILE BASE 1x4 BLOCKING FOR MOUNTING '4" PLYWOOD TICKET BOX TO BE IN LIQUOR ROOM OR OFFICE. IF IN OFFICE PUT DOOR ON FRONT w/ HANDLE AND LOCK Ix3 w/ BEVELED EDGE 1x4 w/ BEVELED EDGE SCREWED TO FRAMING 1 '2 " PLYWOOD BACK 3 4" PLYWOOD W/ FIR EDGE STRIP FIXTURE TYPE. D - SPERO 512 w/ 15 BRUSHED ALUM. GROUND SOCKET. w/ I- 3120 -3 RAC°. FIXTURE TYPE: M - SPERO 516 w/ I BRUSHED ALUM GROUND SOCKET. w! I- 3120 -3 RACO. SCALE: IIt° = 1' -0' 84" AFF IN DINNG AREA OVER FREE STANDING TABLES/ $P AF F IN DINING AREA OVER BOOTH I I � 1x6 UY>OD FURRING A 1 ' MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP. BD. Q � WOOD PANELING LATICRETE 9235 MOJSTURE BARRIER- LAP P -0` UP WALL + — ROCK I' -0' UP WALL DELETE It° GYP. SD. AT SASE 6° TILE SASE 2X8 PRESSURE TIATED CONT. I BLLOCKING AT SASE ��I[� 1 P T 2x6 FRAMING 424' O.G_ ca4T. NOTE= 2x3 FRAMING w/ PLYWOOD SHEATHINGS MAY USED IN LIEU CF 2x4 FRAMING w/ 2x8 BLOCKING. STL. SURFACE MID. I413 COVER C STONECO CAT NO. 2 NOTE,USE.AT LOCATIONS w /GOOTi4 SEATING CONT. 2x4 HEADER 3 S" OAK FLOORING "HARTCO" 3 4" QTR. RND. MOULDING (NAIL TO BASE- NOT FLOORINGS) 3 4" PLYWOOD SHEATHING FIXTURE TYPE: C - SPED S12 m i l 5 BRUSHED ALUM. GROUND SOCKET. RACO 4" SO SOX '189 w/RAG0 '1611111D RING (IFACO 500 2"x3' BOX FOR WOOD COL rim) CF LIGHT FIXTURE 4 CF TABLE 12" DIA LKSHHT FIXTURE (1541TE SHADE) SI AFC 94 DINING AREA OVER SOOTH x for =I„rl. -'»9 H• P4(M) c151 2E TAIL - (*:.re rIX nJR e. Ma,:rmt = BHE£T A-O 1 "E=3 - FOR cooR6kO *Or TO SCALE. SEE SF*EE7 -A -O t E- 3:FOR,000M'D 44TTi'7N .`';. Qeb' V -JOINT SIDING 2x4 6LOCKING CONT. 2x8 OAK CAP (SEE ALT. PET_ AT BAR PLATFOR T NO SACKING REQ'D 2x4 WOOD FRAMING alb" O.G. 2x8 BLOCKING (DEAD WOOD FOR TABLES) Ix6 v-JOINT PINE 510151 ucb PINE BASE (SEE ALT. DET. 3/A -6) (y" "HARTCO" OAK FLOORING 3 4" B -B PLYWOOD VINYL FACED SHEET ROCK PANELS IN KITCHEN . TYPICAL KITCHEN/ PREP AREA FINISH qa " TYPE "X„ MOISTURE RESISTANT GYP. BOARD Ix4. ANCHORED • TO WALL s4" A- CPLYWOOD r CONT. FIR -EDGE M :4. ANCHORED -TO WALL }x6 `.V-JOINT PINE SIDING (54- +11GRADE) CONT 2x4. P f PLATE, ATTACH w/ POWER ACTUFWED FASTENERS 24'. 0.0 Lx6 PINE BASE (SEE ALT. DETAIL 3/A -6) ,.. "HARTCO" OAK. FLOORING EXIST. CONC. SLAB 3 4" QTR. RND. .. (NAIL TO BASE) SUSPENDED ACOUSTICAL CEILING (PAINTED) MARLITE PANELS (WHITE) fie" TYPE "X" PLASTER BOARD VENEER PLASTER (PAINTED) 2x4 PINE SILL (STAINED 9 SEALED) 2x4 STUDS e IS" O.C. 1x4 SLOCKING Ixb v -JOINT PINE SIDING SILICONE CAULK QUARRY TILE SASE OVER 1 /2" DURA ROCK bob PINE BASE (SEE ALT. DETAIL 3 /A -6) . " OAK FLOORING XIST. CONC.'SLAB " " SECTION - (KITGHLW9ININB MALL.) SCALE: 3 4' : 1' -`0" CITY OF TUKWILA ._ APPROVED SEP 17 297 AS riLl ie11" 1800 136th Piece- s R &1 S e ; Tlaa h1ngtDn o 208/247:-31.77 FAX.'2O6 3•- 0••(TrP) Ix4 V -JOINT OAK BASE SHOE MOLDING OAK BOARDS (TYP) NOTES: 1. WHERE THEM ARE NO BOOTHS. APPLY Ix6 BASE BOARDS OVER SIDING 2. WHERE BOOTHS ADJOIN WALL, INSTALL bl6 BASE FLUSH W/ SIDING 2 x 4 BRACES TOP OF In 4! TO STRUCTURE ABOVE • 4-0" ALT. D112 SUSPENDED CEILING PER PLAN 2x BLOCKING- • WALLS 40' - ®" OR TALLER $!S" GUS EA SIDE 2x STUDS •i6 2x8 OAK CAP (BY GC.) 1x4 PINE .APRON (BY. lxb V -JOINT PINE BOARDS YBY GC.) OAK TRIM (FINISHED THICKNID36 >4 ) STL TABLE SUPPORT REFER TO DETAIL ITEM 5A 3 4" QTR. tram". BETWEEN BOOTHS CBY G.C.) 1)(6 PINE BASE SEE 1/A -6 (BY G.CJ FIN. FLOOR -- 2" LEPE _ - ab a/ '4" RUNGS •12 DC. 11.15:8" OAK PIPE — RAIL SUPPORT AT PANEL SEPARATION I CORER6 PRIOR TO FLUTED TRIM 2 "0 GALV. INSULATED ROOF HATCH It li 2 "4 GALV PIPE RAIL 1x6 PINE BASE (QUARRY TILE (BY MILLWORK. CCNT) BASE AT WAITRESS PICK -UP OR KITCHEN ENTRY) ` QUARRY TILE FLOOR (BY G.C.) 2x6 PLATE ON P.T. PLYWOOD BY MILLWORK CONTRACTOR SECTION - (ISVIC,>= PARTITION} SCALE: ,I" : r- 0• '.. : - NOTE: bc6 V- JOINT .5IDRirs IN AREA UNDER BAR TOP FROM EDGE OF TOP TO BAR WALL (EACH SIDE) BUILT - UP ROOFING WOOD BAR SURFACE STAINLESS STEEL BAR SURFACE CANT STRIP AT WAITRESS PICK -UP ii��'E'ITlO TABLE BASE SEE ITEM .10A (FURNISHED BY - OUNER INSTALLED BY MILLWORK CONTRACTOR - °AT JOB SITE) SCALE. 1 • = I' -0" I" OAK COL. CASING:•ADD 6LK'G AS REQ'D FOR SUPPORTING_ LIGHTS (BY G.C.) CITY 06. TUITIILA APAOV:'J- SEP 171357 AS" TJf L 2xS OAK CAPON PARTITION WALL (BY G.C) 3" POPLAR BORDER / NOSING TYP. Lr (3) SIDES. NOTE: ON FREESTANDING TABLE ALL SIDES HAVE BORDER / NOSING .PROJECT `N A:' 3" FOAM CUSHION W/ NAUGHAHYDE ' COVER WI ZIPPER VERIFY 'COLOR. W/ OWNER L miimm•milms \ F , z" GDX TO TEG i . i 1 1 \\ / MI fiVIIIIIIMMINIIMI NOT TO SCALE VERTICAL STRUT TO RESIST VERTICAL COMPRESSION 4 TENSION FORGES PARALLEL TO MAIN RlK1ER ±12 GA WIRE TYP. 4S' MAX, TYP. NOT ATTACH war) BRACING ASSEMBLY • 12' e.c. MAX START FIELD 4' -0" FROM PERIMETER DEMISING WALL. f. INSTALL PER USG STD. 2E -2. STATE OF 14 ETAI L - aug.1 ANCHOR) SEQJtilga-$T (FOR BEER- 4 NUB:) ccm i. sx4r c r ri NOTE: ENN'EL PAINT ON:ALL SFELvES p SECT ION MECUM 6ToRA4S) SCALE: 348 = 1' -0" NOTE: ENAMEL .PANT :ON ALL'SIAACES 244 VERT. SUPPORT .46 0.C. CONT. 1x4 SCREWED TO METAL FRAMING :(TYP). T 2x6 P1 5i-va AN- SEE CEILING PLAN SE° 17 1 AS, v . L1.i 8UiLDI�I Dt�t�S ?2 1800. - 198th Place -LE SWte Bellevue, lrezhingten 88001x 206/747 - 9177 TAX- ST EA K'H.Ot3SE ~_ SCALE: ab" • I' -0" _ 4'-e O.G. 34" PLYUJOOD SHELVES NOT ENAMEL PAINT ON ALL SHELVES PLAN VIEW CEILING AT S` -0" AFF f 4 - 0 pc NOTE: ENAMEL PANT ON ALL SHELVES ELEVATION ALL WALLS EXCEPT POTATO 51-ELF WALL Ix4 SCREWED TO 2x STUDS 2x4 ETAILS - (DRY STORAGE S-4ELvING) cli-CVS0 l3' 281y" 6U4' -0 NOTE: ENAMEL PAINT ON 'ALL SHELVES 3 h° A -C PLYIU OD (TYP) 244 VERY. SUPPORT .48" OZ. PLAN TOP AND SELF EDGE CONY. 244 (TYP) CONT. 644 SCREWED TO METAL FRAT11 (TYP) 2x6 e16" O.C. CONT. P.T. 2x6 (TYP) CONT. HR EDGE TOLD PRY TILE BASE PLAN VIEW NOTE: ENAMEL PAINT ON ALL SHELVES ELEVATION 4'-0" OL. TOP SHELF: 2x4 FRAMING e24" O.G. SOT SHELF: 2xb P.T. FRAMING elb" O.G. CEILING AT S' -0" AFF NOTE. ENAMEL PAPIT,CN ALL SHELVES - OL. POTATO SHELF WALL ONLY NOTE: ENAMEL PAINT ON ALL SURFACES D ETAILS - (POTATO SHELVING) A -8 SCALE: jb" • 1' -0• CDX PLYWOOD CONT. 2x4 SECTION - (LIQUOR sroRaS) SECTION marATO eu�a am�) SGA I• . P•O• G ALE 1" . I.-O• 3 4" CDX PLYWOOD 2x4 AT 24" OL. CONT. I44 SCREWED TO FETAL FRAMING (TYP) h" CDX PLYWOOD 244 VERT. SUPPORT •4S" 00. CDX PLYWOOD 246 X16" D.C. / CCNT::P.T. 246. try CONT. FIR EDGE MOLD TILE.SASE -0^ gropiAGE 3.-72,X5-5 xl 4 3 . at: = 'dr • I, FICIMMONME NIZZE=MnMEINMENZIMMIIIIM 1115.11EMNIEN MINISMIENIUMENIS SEMBEICEMIMENU P-1 'MEM ukt-leN*6114134W-::' ithq BIZEZ=MEME/21111111112MENZERRIZON 5 APP. 9`-0 AFF. .cfigrct. M-0 comi mai moxf s mem mamonSEMIE sumoremmem maw Immumeanzamon EBORKEIMMIK61010111 wouninkticlumum ommumull ,• • KITCHEN • W-3W4 DISI4tUASHER W-3 ELECT. ROOM W-5 W-3/W-4 • LU-3 ,*70E V-0.:AFF„. NEVMAR5-2-317. • RECEIVED rP4 PROJECT •NAME •• GENERAL NOTES: • . I) LIM. DOOR FRAMES TO BE IS GA. KO. TYPE. . ,.--.; 14OLLOW METAL DOORS TOBEIS GA. FLU. (uLNsivrei"). $7:trTArgRP F,i statu coLoRS. 4 BRANDS 5) ALL oOR FRAMES (0 SINGLE LEAF DOORS) 94441.L BE RIRNI.ED WITH 3 RUBBER SILENCERS PER STRIKE JAMB. PANG ,AcE TO HAYS' A CONCEALE TICAL ROD. • . DOOR MATERIAL ufroor, c4.Ass 2 )..4 METAL le FLUSH CORE • S STAIN CsRADE 7 ® ®® 0® DOOR SCI—EDULE KEY HARDWARE $E.T Na I (DOOR!) (A) 2 PR HINGES (PER LEAF) '(G) 2 CLOSURES (F) I THRESHOLD •(F) ! SET WEATHERSTRIPPING (B) I OUTSIDE CYLINDER/STRIKE (() 2 WOOD PULL HANDLE , (F) I SWEEP 444RDWARE SET NO. 2 (DOOR 4) (4.) PR HINGES -(G) I CLOSURE (14i I EXIT ALARM-PANIC DEVICE (F) I THRESHOLD (F) 1 SET WEATHERSTRIPPING (K) I WOOD FULL HANDLE (F) I SWEEP HARDWARE SET NO. 3 (DOOR 5 4 6) (A) f pR 4INGE3 (G) I CLOSURE (C) I PUSH PLATE (c) I PULL PLATE „(D) 2 KICK PLATES (E) I W4LL BUMPER (A) t-V2 PR HINGES (13) I PRIVACY LOCKSET (G) 1 CLOVWEE (A) /-1/2 F I-IINGES (8) I KEYED LOCKSET (DOOR 7 4) WINDOW SCHEDULE QTY MATERIAL GL.AZING 3r-6" 9 FRAME MATERIAL 0 WOOD CLAD ALUMINIUM 2 HoLLotur-ETAL-wELDED • DOOR HARDWARE SCHEDULE (I-IARDUJARE SET NO. 5 - NOT USED) Fl3B119 4-1/2x4-I/2 NRP x U.510/5 1600 SERIES A x TRI-STYLE BRONZE 513DKI3 x 12" 100NDKB x 6010 BISON x U510B W/ TI42514 PIECE INSIDE . SEE TEMPLATE DRAWING 600DKIE. 6(50E2KB FE43119 4 NRP x U5I0E5 1600 SERIES x x T!-STTLE BRONZE ECL 2200 (NO CYLINDER RECD) 5131,K.15 x 36" 100NDKI3 x 3010 SEE TEMPLATE THIS DRAWING 600DK.F3 FBE3119 4-I/2x4-1/2 x 35144 1600 SERIES x A x TRI-STYLE BRONZE 3-1/235" x RC x U51015 106 x 10 3-1/2)415' x RC x 34108 8" x 34" U510E9 404 HARDWARE SET NO. 4 HARDWARE SET NO. 6 (DOOR 9 4 i0) HARDWARE SET NO. 1 (DOOR It) FBBI13 4-1/2x4-I/2 x 3510B A-SERIES LEvON 440934144 1600 SERIES x DA x TRI-STYLE BRONZE F119 4-1/2x4-1/2 NRP 05100 A-SERJES LEvON ASOFT) 34I015 (A) I-V2 PR LINGES FI/S 4-1/2x4-V2 NRP x 35104 (15) I KEYED LOCKSET A-SERIES LEvON A80PD 35108 (8) 1 CLOSURE 1600 SERIES x 14 x 114-STYLE BRONZE 1 THRESHOLD MARBLE x 36" (F) I SWEEP 600DK8 CM Y.. LPL; DOUBLE U—VALUE 51-4GC 2 viEtYL DOUBLE 054 2 ' Y 411. DOUBLE 054 I vINYL 1204 *43-ED AND/oWCAULKEP AS 4 • DOOR FINISH 0 STAN SEALER . ® 1..IITE ENAMEL ® ENAMEL To MATCH TRIM HARDWARE SET NO. S (DOOR 3) (A) 1-.1/2 PR HINGES (LI) EXIT ALARM (0) I CLOSURE (F) I SET WEATHERSTRIPPING, (F) I T14RESHOLD (C) 2 PULLS (BOTH SIDES) (F) (M) (D) (E) (.1) HARDWARE SET NO. 9 (DOOR 13) (A) (B) (B) (F) (F) (A) (B) (B) (F) SWEEP PIVOT ARMOR PLATE KICK DOWN STOP PANIC DEVICE -1/2 PR HINGES PASSAGE LATCH DEADBOLT SET WEATWERSTRIPPING THRESHOLD (L) 2 SURFACE BC _TS (F) I SWEEP HARDWARE UT NO. 10 (DOOR 12) -1/2 PR HINGES PASSAGE LAID-) DEADE3OLT SET WEATHERSTRIPPING (F) I THRESHOLD (F) SWEEP HARDWARE SET NO. II (DOOR 2) (A) 2 PR WINGES PER LEAF (G) 2 CLOSERS (K) 2 WOOD PULL HANDLES (F) I THRESHOLD 3-0" ED® HARDWARE MANUFACTURERS ItUtiZUOVAIttt 9 CD@ FRAME FINISH 0 STAN 4 SEALER ® 1134ITE ENAMEL ® E3RON38 ENAMEL 0 ENAMEL TO MATCH TRIM ® ENAMEL TO MATCH EXTER/OR FB/3119 4-1/2x4-1/2 NRIF 4425004 1600 SERIES x DA x TRI-STYLE BRONZE 100ND x 3668 513 x 42" 106 x 10 200NA x 42" 253LH 4214 x 4451.1HINSIDE) 460 5515741-4 U5I0B FITS 4-1/574-1/2 NRP A-SERIES ORBIT 4105 13461P 111/ BLANK PLATE INSIDE 100N x 6068 513 x 12" 550 (TOP 4 4011.- INSIDE) 6004 FITS 4-1/2.4-I/2 NRP A-SERIES ORBIT 410534144 8461P WI BLANK PLATE INSIDE 100N x 3065 513 .4 36" 6004 x 36 (A) HINGES (13) KEYED LOCKSETS,PRIvACT LOCKSET, P455308 LATCH, DEAD BOLT (C) PUSH-PULL (0) KicKpLATES - ARMOR PLATE (E) FLOOR STOP - KICK 0034. WALL BUMPER (F) THRESHOLD, U.EATHERSTRIPPING, DOOR SWEEP, ASTRAGAL (0) CLOSER (H) EXIT ALARM - PANIC DEVICE (J) PANIC DEVICE (K) WOOD PULL HANDLE (L) SURFACE BOLTS (M) PIVOT HINGE • Feens 4-I/2x4-//2 35108 1600 SERIES x DA x TRI-STYLE BRONZE SEE TEMPLATE - THIS DRAWING WOOD x 12" STANLEY SCHLAGE ROCKWOOD ROCKWOOD ROCKWOOD NATIONAL GUARD NORTON DET1EXT VON DUPRIN (CUSTOM MADE) ROCKWOOD WAGER P-I F-I C-3 C-4 kg:',71W WALK-IN COOLER, - WALK-IN FREEZER TWO COATS.McCORMICK VINYL LATEX, - GULL WHITE FL OC;;IRIN • NOTE: SEE WALL DETAILS WALLCOvERING NOT USED. 3<4 CROW MOULDING. 6" PINE WOOD BASE. CEILING CELOTEX-53" VANTAGE-IC-COLOR "1211-11TE". ITEM 30" GRAB BAR 42" GRAB BAR • 42736 0648 84 RESTROOM PIxTUIRES DESCRIPTION F-2 F-2 F-2 • -- F-2 • 1,...EGEND - ROOM PINI CHEDULE • AFF, • AFF. p USE SEMI-GLOSS ENAMEL ON ALL PAINTED SURFACES AND PRIMED METAL DOOR FRAMES 8 - 2 S'-e" AFF. USE EPoxr FLOOR GROUT .P-3 ,TEXTURED - PAINTED SUER-WIN-W/LLIAMISPROMAR 100 SEMI-GLOSS ACRYLIC ENAMEL 5W41-10 (TUJO COATS) P-4 STO SYSTEM FINISH MATERIAL OVER DENSGLASS FIBERGLASS BOARD SHEATHING. INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS 4 , REQUIREMENTS B-I 6" WOOD. - 10-2 6" CERAMIC TILECCAEBASE TO MATCH F-2 FLOORING. COVE TO FLOOR AND TO WALL. INSTALL BASE OVER DUROCK CEMENT BOARD 12" HIGH ON WALL. NOTES: (INSTALL, QUARRYTILE BASE OVER LATICRETE 9235 ON INSIDE WALL OF EAR AND KITCHEN/DINNQ WALLS 45 NOTED.) ALL FLOORING, TO SE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. 14ARTCO P4118449-PLUS ACRYLIC IMPREGNATED wool, FLOORING (RANDOM LAID IN IS", 27" 4 36" LENGTHS. COLOR: "GINGER'. NOTE: G.C. RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING-LEVEL SUBSTRATE PRIOR TO WOOD FLOORING INSTALLATION DAL-TILE (OR AMERICAN OLEAN) 6 X 6" ABRASIVE QUARRY TILE FLOOR AND EASE. COLOR "CANYON RED" WITH NATURAL GREY GROUT. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION USE EPDXY FLOOR GROUT IN DISHWASHER AREA. NOTES (INSTALL 042ARR5 TILE SASE OVER LATICRETE 5235 ON INSIDE WALL OF BAR AND KITCHEN/DINING WALLS AS NOTED.) ALL FLOORING TO BE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS. 129-2 4 BRIGHT GLAZE CERAMIC TILE, THIN SET, TO 6 ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR M1DSTATE 808. COLOR "ALMOND" 31/ WHITE GROUT TEXTURED STUCCO (P-3) FROM 6 TO CEILING. 23-3 GLASTEEL-SERIES 1200703 FLAT OR APPROVED EQUAL FRP. (STRUCTO( MARLITE) WITH DIVIDER STRIPS AND INSIDE OUTSIDE COINER MOLDING OVER V:" MR GYP SP. COLOR TOTE OR '13EIGEAS SHOLN CN PLAN, W-4 STAINLESS STEEL tUALL PANELS OVER 45 " FIRE TREATED PLYWOOD (STAINLESS PANELS P(2RN/51-4ED 4 INSTALLED Er FOOD SERVICE CONTRACTOR). 4-5 I ROUGH TEXTURED VENEER PLASTER EQUAL TO GOLD BOND "UNICAL" SAND TEXTURE (P-3) PAINT. PINE PANELING 4 TRIM WAINSCOT. (545-1 GRADE) - SEE WALL SECTIONS AND NOTES BELOW. W-6 PRESTPLATE METAL PANELS PATTERN "201. AA-ABEINGDON AFFILIATES (718) 2E5-9333 OR CHICAGO METALLIC PATTERN •3165 (900)323-1164. 4 - 1 4 i," PAINTED PLYWOOD' SCRELIJED TO METAL STUDS - USE FIRE TREATED PLYWOOD IN NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION TYPES. NOTES: • ALL GYP. SD. IN KITCHEN 4 TOILET ROOMS SHALL BE "GREENBOARD" (UX0.) ' • SEE SPACE FLOOR PLANS AND WALL SECTIONS FOR 191000 WAINSCOT. FINISH SHALL BE: STAIN COAT: IMINUAX."GOLDEN OAK 4 pRovENciAL" NIXED 50/50 FINISH: TWO COATS-SPAR VARNISH, (GLOSS) SANDED BETWEEN APPLICATIONS. • ALL WALLS NOT REFERENCED SHALL BE PAINTED DRYWALL. (P-I) NON C-I CELOTEX-41a" VANTAGE-I0 PRE-FINISHED (SEE NOTE ?BELOW -COLOR: "OUTBACK PURPLE'. GRID, A/C GRILLES, L/04-IT FIXTURE FRAMES TO BE PAINTED OUT8ACK PURPLE. C-2 CELOTEX-4e VANTAGE-I0 P44-FINISHED (SEE NOTE BELOW) -COLOR: "CUTBACK ORANGE" GRID, A/C GRILLES, LIGHT FIXTURE FRAMES TO BE PAINTED 0318406 0449-344. 53" PAINTED PLYWOOD SUPPORTED ON 2x4 JOIST - IS" O.C. - USE FIRE TREATED PLYWOOD IN NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION TYPES. C-5 2x4 VINYL COVERED SHEET ROCK-PANELS (IN ALUMINUM GRID SYSTEM) COLOR "WHITE'. NOTE: PREFINISHED TILES BY THE CEILING MANUFACTURER TO MATCH.OUTBACK COLORS. PRE-FINISHED CEILING TILE TO BE ORDERED AND PAID FOR E3Y THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR FROM, GATOR GYPSUM 3904 E. 4r24110 DRIVE TELE., 513-240-6393 TAMPA, F_ORIDA 33605 FAX SI3-241-2141 PAINTS FOR GRID, A/C GRILLES AND L134 FIXTURE FRAMES ARE CUSTOM COLORS AVAILABLE THROUGH MCI PAINTS IN TAMPA, FLORIDA (513) 933-141I, BOTH ORANGE AND PURPLE ARE 50/50 MIXES OF "450 AND .120 BASED MATERIALS. CEFLIG TILES AND PAINTS ARE NON-UBSTIIIIIE •( OR APPROVED EQUAL) SOAP DISPENSER SUPPLIED BY OUTBACK STEA63NOUSE IN PIENS AND 11109-10 RESTROOMS. TOWEL- DISPENSER 150BRICK . 1,262 SE MIULTI-FoLD., , . TISSUE. DISPENSER e0454906 44740DVAL ROLL.- . , TOILET PARTITIONS AMERICAN SANITARY PARTITIONCORP.- PLASTIC LAMINATE.TYPE FL -P (R)3L FLUSH TYPE U.VTOP RAIL 54'-W 08. . . . . . . SOAP DISPENSER SOORICKB-2111 (ErispLoYEE:TOILET IROOMI ONLY) , _ ,.- TOWEL DISPE7,16. ER EOBRICK,B,26;“Et'IPLOYEE 'TOILET 4DcW - . , -. . . - . . -- . . ' '- - - - 4441,4191444:4494.4401 04.4ROROILEit lE, WOK 0.04,15. TO .. 9.14.34. STIEEL PANELA C.. 8084306- IIII' DIA PROVIDE SOLID WOOD IsLoCKIN0 IN WALLS AS RECOMMENDED BY MPR. FOR SUPPORT. 5094CK- II/2" DIA.- PROVIDE SOLID WOOD BLOCKING IN WALLS AS RECOMMENDED 81 MFR. FOR SUPPORT. 1508RICK- III" DIA ONE PIECE - PROVIDE SOLID WOOD BLOCKING IN WALLS AS RECOMMENDED BY MIFR FOR SUPPORT. EMPLOYEE RESTROOM ONLY - mANLFACTURED titaUC-44 COOLER • Tg mANusacnIRED W.4LK-4 FFEEZER Ygra,,,T,L4 M-Z5, CITY OF Tthvi, SEP 1 7 Ar ,4K.0:4 Li/TONE CASE 0 - . , $00:45.41‹:'CAO5?4 01fr 51 i.) 58074353 . . 504 3 ,644 - 0363. AS RBQUIFziiE,f,,RSUPPO§7.- OF WALL N�W DATE DRAWN By SOUTHCENTER Pt* Turmuk w DRAWINI;(:TME ROOM ANI: SCHEDUL, engem ,rsy* 44 •; I MEM , MIRROR \\ \\\\ • i --,+ - - II [----' I ■ GREASE DUCT VERIFY SIZE TOP oF RATED CEILING CR EXHAUST HOOD 16 GA GALE. METAL CLOSER CTION KJT PSI. VELD TO DUCT =GT 111-1APT SIE NOT TO CERAMIC TILE WAINSCOT (TYP.) TEXTURED VENEER PLASTER (TYP.) BABY CHANCING STATION -- I 1/2” DIA GRAB BAR TYP. 3/4 P.T. PLYWOOD ABOVE ROOF I-OLD TO TOP OF CUT W/2" CANT STRIP ATTACHED TO EXTERIOR WALL 4 ROOF 2 :IV' STEEL STUDS 6 16'' cc. SEAL ALL JOINTS IN GYP. 13D. ILI/GYPSUM r.1.1D /TAPE 1, GA GALE. TOP PLATE WELD TO DUCT VENT ROOF TEED ADAPTER ROOFING, CANT STRIP 4 PT BD. BY OTHERS -ROOF LINE PENETRATION AND BLOCKING BY OTHERS I4AR RATED CMS, TEL STUDS UV 5/8" TYPE "X" ate BOTH SIDES. ELEvATION SCALE: , 2" • r-0" V ELEvATION SCALE: tv3 • V BASE FLASHING AND CANT STRIP. WATER TIDE-rr LEVEL CURB/FLASHING BY OTHERS. I-HR RATED CONST: MTL. STUDS WI 5/8' TYPE 'IX" AVE BOTH AIDES. 12" ROUND MAKE-UP AIR SUPPLY FLEX FROM MU-I 7 j \, (TEMP AIR) ),1 SUPPLY AIR DIFFUSER TO KITCHEN AREA HvD SERIES WI 12, COLLAR TYPICAL APPROVED UL-LISTED FIRE DAMPER PROVIDED , NFPA-SS CLASS I HOOD MAKE: SAFE AIR MODEL: GUC COMPENSATING STYLE CLASS I EXHAUST HOOD TEXTURED VENEER PLASTER (TYP.) BABY CHANGING STATION I I/2' DIA. GRAB BAR TYP NMI ALL WALLS NOT SHOO ARE TO BE SIMILAR TO ELEVATION 21A ROOF L INE IDAIMPER 6 ACCESS I-HOUR RATED T-BAR CEILING FLOOR LINE PANELV COOK L INE Zy r " r1 25 E I L. 1ST= EXLIST kO - PREP KITCHEN -10 SCALE: N.T.S. '.■■■■'/ A / A \ TP HOLDER V17-0(SO 4. 4. ISQ-TEE A WET CHEMICAL EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM WILL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL CLASS I HOODS AND WILL COMPLY TO THE UMC SEC. 2094, FIRE DEPARTMENT AND FIELD INSPECTION PT THE LOCAL JURISDICTION FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDED DETAILED DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATION TO THE LOCAL JURISDICTION FOR REVIEW 3" AIR SPACE 61/ WALL CLOSURE LON, MAINTAIN A CLEARANCE FROM COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS OF NOT LESS THAN 18" FROM THE HOOD. THIS MAY BE REDUCED TO NOT -ESS THAN a° INCHES PROVIDED TN COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL IS PROTECTED WITH ONE HOUR RATED MATERIAL (UMC SEC. 2903D, (REF. TO ARCH. DRAWINGS) NO TILE BEHIND MIRROR WOOD FRAME AROUND MIRROR - - - TO ADJACENT AIR INL T TYPICAL GREASE OUTLET TRUSSES REFER STRUCTURAL AIR SPACE MAINTAIN MIN. 3" TO MAX. CLEARANCE ON ALL SIDES OF DUCT TYP. ALL GREASE DUCT SHAFT ENCLOSURES TO BE SIZE AS NOTED. DUCTWORK TO BE ALL WELDED CONSTRUCTION LIQUID 4 AIR TIGHT CONTINUOUS \, 3 ELEvATION ZVSCALE: • 1'-0 TEXTURED VENEER PLASTER (TYP) 3:3" HOT WATER PIPE 4 DRAIN La/ INSULATION PLAN SCALE t • 1 MI in n IMINIEMMIIIIIINIEWM111111111111•1111 IMIIMM11111111W 1•1111112=61, MUMMA em. m. mrAT . 11111111 .j win • \ MIRROR \\\ - // 30x46 e , NO TILE BEHIND WOOD FRAME AROUND MIRROR 24 DEEP PLAM COUNTER TOP WI PLAN BACKSPLASH AND FRONT. MACHINE PRODUCT50.111-I125) 515 WASTE CHUTE, FRANKLIN j' EvA, T ION SCALE: • P-V MENS - - - cTUU ESTROOM / • WASTE BASKE" SELOW- — 7 EXIT CITY OF .uvIIIL APPROVED SE? 1 7 1:S27 REST ROOM PLAN 4 z;TAE,D4='7ER ELEVATIONS BABY CHANGING STATION DATE MAY 23, I7 1/2 D'A, GRAB BAR TYP REVISIONS PERMIT CFNTE. UNPUBLISHED WORK 01997 MERRICK LENTZ ARCHITEcT PROJECT NAME OUTBACK STEA K HO USE DRAWING TITLE DRAWN BY JEH CHECKED BY . C RECEIVED 4 ITY OF TUKWILA MERRICK LENTZ ARC ITECT 1800 - 196th Place N.E. Suite 100 Bellevue. Washington 98005 208/747-3177 FAX 206/747 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA WA 7 fP, 8-4- PER C.O. TUKWILA ij CI • ■••.1:, • Re Eh±L 6.0°V4LARRY-71LETeoRit-ArfERH- C•40- • ‘SQUARES ' MET FLUSH tu/ rLOOR., ENTRY MATTING, l2 SELF:EDGE' n % ( . 6 ABRASIYE atIARK,T TILE - - AMPACTURER REC.OftERDATION. OORc4JT IN PROJECT NAME INI PLAN scC.E, 1,..EGEN11:) ltl00t, FLOORING R.ANIDOTI LAID IN IS 21" 4 36" HARTCO PATTERN-PLLIS ACRYLIC LENGTH*, COLOR GINGER. IrIPREGKATED ILIOOD FLOORING, REFER SHEET IA LOCATION AND FINISH FOR CONCRETE WALKWAY DOUBLE BULL NOSE QUARRY TILES ' SHOLDS 4 SIDEYIALLS 1E OUAL DISTANCE FROM BOTH CrNTER ENTRY MATTING DIY OF TOOVOLA K-PROVED SE? 17 1C.';? _)V QUARRY TILE 1800 - 188th Ewe ItStdte Be3leeue. Tashiniton:98000 206/747 VAX 208/141 SOUTHCENTER PARK TLE‘Aill..A, WA 7 , . , DRAWING TITLE FLOOR IN ie+4 PLAN • - -,...- ,ReOtilfir6 • . • .. ,..,:•:,-..,...-• • - collgol.li;A. : •-•,..,•... -', 'T • •••••, - •.•,,',(.,::•-•.',...,•'•;.;.'"•'-',,:' - ,. ..,. .. ,.........,-..., .,,......_....,-„..-,,,,•-,,•••., • •,..,..• .. . . iENTER:::' • •,'••-sEE 5f . FOR CocarioN • • - .. ,..„ • •• • ....' ' i ' •;'';' ; ,: " •:''.. ",; ''' ' ' ' . ' '' ''- 1 , '; ': ' '.-•': ; _, • ,......,:._ ,,..1,••511;CTIN.--.,4,4,-.._ ' ,,,-• _...: ,..... -,- .., , ;;;' , :' , :•:;;..;:.:J=.7;- , ..:• - --::: - .-::'• , :::' , ,l , „.. , ..:,.. , , , ,,. - ...: - ...:•.',..• - :.•' - ...:::,..,,.:' ,. - - ,:: - ;;•4.:.•,•. , .. - •::: , ,,•:.•::.H.', ; DATE . M41"." 23, DRAWN BY * CHECKED BY REVISIONS. 1.1ChWTINCI LW = NOTEW 0 COMLi614T COMPACT PLUORZSCZNT 9ONNLI4WIT • 1,- PROM PA ErE Ap WALL (TYP oF A • 0 ,--.., ! 12" PENI7ANT"L(614T — --16"7 44'W wad r TEr Lf6-NT - ' , ....."' 2X4 PLUOReSCENT MIN :41-: .00i.244i.lerr'efiT . - - -. - . ' - ',-. • , yliii.' amen Lammas - • WALL Komiao , . , , . ' C41.1"4'1°V14TW'' • ` ' del 'aiLitib WPPORT ' l' T- 4 41'4 ' 4"11 7 12AP ,..: ''' - ' seE ELZGTIRIGAL. PLANS Falk,P ', * SEE 51-EES r.......pOR rrrgS - • ,. i_ i i xTure bliTtNa rfra 5HOWN . I. TH = i - S A SHEg noN r otii. rd ,4 . e. , s , , ro gg siaiwrep 64° A sea a= FL-m.0 -- • - -. -, • , - -". F41!,:--, , .- -- _ --„ :, .r,.._;- -,,,,,,,,_:, -,,,;:-.., 1111111111111 1 0 m „,.:.:: „‘,,,,......, Elm L' ; ' -"'. ii ' • ' 4 _ -0'!.-CEILINS memigr„ 1,... I ,_ : p agnewureskasailsonminzetanimmir . _,_11.....,5_ , 7 III IBS -. 11111111X :..,„ ... _____ MP 1 lat 0 _. •'- , - ' 0 '' --. '9, '-'' ',' 111 TAININ I 11 i 1111 ' lib ,, II_ , 11 __ oil ili .7-s....-, "." reiv a cir \ - „:„- MN milirati A . '411161111111 0111111 I \---- EEE 'Mill NW 1 IrMiTirglifrel itaill I : • I, 1 7_' 1 ' •I .:; \ (-, , 0 I 'II Mill ffr arfir F — 111111111 .7., . -,------_,----,:: _1111516111 IMMO!! 1 = — I — 11111.111111 sim I m31,..womer --. IIIIIIIIMI ii 'iiiiIMIM... mni' ra illaillE '' 11 ' ''' 11.1111T rili"-:--.- 0 r-.1.1.-.--Im°-----i-il, II Islw • li ir 1, MEN ,( I IIIL, IIIMMIIIME 'Will IIII ME ;1 , 0 I , , ,L____.____j ,1 I M. 1 11111111 IIMFM1-------- r ---, , , , _j IIIM III Mil= EMI IF /IA* imp IEEE MIMI . ,..=. --4 im Ems El li ll anNITIMIMUMMIMUMUMMIMIIMIMUIMIIIIMI. H I .... 11111111r ; 4:3 , 1 , Q it) :Ifr Ls IIIMMIME 1110111“1111=1111Mil =MENN• Lima mimes ex 24" . Araity. ,2x4 CL6 JOIST CLS 24 O.G. {.1/ 5/5“ 6 2x4 CL6 JOIST PROJECT NAME cA o REFLECTED CEILING F'LAN SGftJ 1/4" I '-0" ; 1 SOFF T Ix6 V-JOINT SOFFIT INS V-JOINT SEP 17 SOUTRCENTER TIKVVILA WA DRAWING TITLE REFLECTEIP CEILIN4 PLAN 1 - H - =] 4 Cl.b. I PRY 1,i'-=1", - I IT. I 2-b 1 Lt E 1 1 L C) r • -- i ' -'0 ACC BOARD % LADDER NONE : 1 i SEE NOTE 4 SYSTEM ROOF L__ I _ BEER DELIVER RECESSED 7' 11.1.--N: . 0 1--i\ 2 1-116H / i I I 0 " . 1- i.,: '',1/.--,a .. '- F, I i 7. .11 `gI.'I --Ai T'\' . ..1 ( t , 'i ,i 1 I-I , , 1 . H • , ----- 0ex - 1 ' A §, „ 1 1 I° / 1 1 ,, , ,, K - L K-IN Li ono (13 X VERIFY) DR. RAIL 5 5 15X55. • NKON. 4,Y BOOTH 30X46 P'Logg LIGHT B EACH FOUR FOOT (PHIMAg RACK OF 544_vinis. BOTTOM 21.0 LVES FOR END SUPPLY '1" HOOKS nyzi L roii-oTho Ak !LENT / SEATIN6 PLAN . - NIV SCALE, 1/4" = 220 10 6(6B SO. FT. a t EWE! : • 1• ' REFER To sTRuoT. bx6 POST TYP • I ! TT_ • : L fl CITY OF TUIVILA SE P 1 7 127 ■ 1800 - l'38th Place XL, Stitt6. Bellevue. Waddhigton 08806 , 208/747-3177 YAX 208/747-71*. PROJECT NAME DRAWING TITLE EGUIPMENT SEATING fr PLAN NOTES suPPLIER5 ON NTRAcTOR c.,. ._ LOT COMPLETE TO ALLOW FOR LARSE TRUCXS • AND BACK KITCHEN WALL TO BE LEFT OJT • .1. CONTRACTOR TO HAVE SUB -SASE IN PARKINS • S.SMALL BAP. WALL SECTION'EETWEEN PASS1.INDE TO ACCESS BACK OF BUILDING FOR EQUIPMENT • UNTIL BAR.BDUIPMENT HAS eEEN INSTALLED. P-41.-tvgt EE5. 4 -.. .E.;E1Z-Vklt5 - TO S3E.S USPeND ED . I410 KfT0HN AA VVALL LEGEND - ...• . . •••' ,gRA8T, • SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY •• • • ,...• TUKWILA,' Wk. • • •. • • DATE MAY 23, k3S DRAWN BY CHECKED BY REVISIONS PE2c) TO 48" &FF. ) LOW WALL ( WOOD STUD PARTITION • RECEIVED TO 54 AFF. ) . cn • 1-AGI-k WALL ( WOOD STUD PARTITION - • 14 12 24 20 - ill LL--/ MALL BACKING PLAN q , SCALE: 1/4" = 1)ci'l-C)1 I 1 \ k rtalMeell INR.KROMMONO00 9. NIMBOIVREMO - 681111M1111111111111111111 nernal01•111•111•10Ini, lAlAL_L BACKING SCHEDULE I) MALL ESACKJN6 PROM 6, Arr. DONN TO 42 APF. FOR ITEM MO. AFI 2) MA. BACK. FROM 60" APP. DOWN TO 42 A.F.F. FOR ITEM *45A 91 KAU_ 13,...KINS FROM 46 APP. DOWN TO FIN. FLOOR FOR ITEM 624, 3, 4) MALL BACK). FROM 5, APP. 004.. TO 24 A.FP. FOR ITEM *SI 5) WALL MACKIN& FROM 6 DOM TO 42 AFP FCR ITEM .53 6) WALL BAC.. FRC61 A.F.F. DoriNTO 54 APP. FOR ITDH *51 1) w rIA1.4 2. _ , BACKINS, FROM A11; TO 6 viALL A. FRYERS FALL CONTI). TNE 6 ?V 1/2 DUROCK TO FIN. FLR. 6) 2' MALL SLOCKNS PROM 6 A.PP. DOWN 4'.-0 FOR ITEM .12A AND 6, 6 4) WALL BACK,. FROM 42 Arr. D05.61 TO 10 AFF. FOR ITEM •44 10) 2,ULL. BLOCK!. FROM 11,PP. DOWN TO 42 FOR ITEM .45 4) NALL BACK,. FROM A.F.F. DOM TO 46 AF.F. FOR ITEr•-■*10 I0613, COAT HOOKS WALL BACK. FROM 46 A.F.F. DOWN TO 24 APF. FOR OFFICE SHELVES IS) FULL BACK,. FROM 6 APP. COM TO IV A.F.F. FOR MOP SINK AREA. i4) WALL BACK*. FROM CEILINS TO Fimisoar, FLOOR 6/2 PVC), INSTALL 1/2 PAO CEILINS) FOR 17E51 *104 1 5, YLN.1 BALK!. FROM 30 DOM TO 20 APP. FOR ITEM M 55) WALL EACKINS FROM 1'6' A.FP. DOAN TO *V APF. FOR ITEM 8 /0 IT MALL BAC.. FROM 34 DOAN TO 54 FoR .) MALL SAC.. FROM EYO TO FINISH FLOOR FOR FOR LADDER HU MALL ISACKINS FROM 46 APP. DOWN TO IV AF F. FOR ITEM ASO 20) MALL BACK*. FROM G., 51EIONT DC6.170 AFF. FCR ITEM .16 WATER FILTE3.3 1, AI 21) WALL BACKINS FROM 63 A.F.F. DO*. TO SO' F FoR rrEM FULL SAC.. FROM A.FF DONN TO lee A.F FOR ITEM .06A 25) WALL BACKIN0 FROM LEILIN6 TO FINISH FLOOR 241 FLALL BLOCKIN6 PROM 66 APP. DO. Up AF FOR ITEM MI5 BABY CHANSINS TABLE 24) MALL BACK!. MOM DLO AFF. *arc TO 3 AFF 25) WALL BACK. FROM 5, A, F. DOWN TO FOR ITEM .21, *3I AND ASO 26) AALL BLOCK!. FROM AFF 570Y TO 0 AF F. FOR ITEM *122 AND .223 BEER DELIVERY SYSTEMS 21) WALL BACKINS FROM /3 AP F DOM TO 4 AF.F. FOR AREA /4011E4 .44 OVERNO. 5TO. CABO-E15 (WEN RECD. IN BAR) 26) YU. BACK*. FROM 8Lo A.F F. DOI. TO 6 APP. FOR AIR .FtTAIN NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO USE THIS DRAAIN6 IN CONJUNCION MTN KITCHEN ECUIP*115, 012.115165 BACK!. • I/2 PLYN0057 ELOCICIN6 • 2 X _ _ _SOLID STFRICP.,RAL M00/2 SUPPORT 2) THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A0012 BACKING C., SUFFICIENT SIZE TO ANCI40R ALL TOILET PARTITIONS, LAVATORIES, TABLE TOPS, PAY" PHONES, ETC.. 8) SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR LOCATION OF ALL BACKING FOR TABLE BASES RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWIL4. OUT11 C STEA KHO USE PROJECT NAME SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY, TUKWILA, WA „, , GENERAL NOTES 0 PROVIDE 2 X S BACKING AT ALL TABLE BASES SEE ARCHITECTURAL riALL SECT ONS (TYP * TABLE) DRAWING TI'TLR WALL BACKING PLAN DATE MAY 23,,491 DRAWN BY ... JEN' CHECKED BY REVISIONS : , PECIMITCLaC7 , 1800 - 138th Place N.L. Suite 100 • 1 Bellevue. Washington 98005 N 208/747 -3177 FAX 208/747-7149 - - I r L J D - $o 1' -lo" 28' -t0° F — I r L " L 11' -1U' HTT22 HOLDUP* PER E /S3 11' -la TYPICAL INTERIOR FOOTING 5' -6 X 5 - X 14" { /(8) A4 EACH WAY 8077041 6" SLAB ON GRADE W/ ;4 0 16'o.c EACH WAY OVER 6 MIL VAPOR BARRIER AND DRANAGE ' ATERIAL SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR .SLAB DEPRESSIONS AND STEPS E L ° J k 11' -l0" 32` -2" — r r — 5112 S3 OOM PER / P I I_ J LJ 10' -2 1/2" r Z L O ff �- SLAB JOINTS 7 1° X 1 /8° CONTINUOUS QUICK JOINT OR SAWN JOINT P 1/2 DIA PLAIN ROUND STOCK (436) X ' 3' -0". ®.24" ac GRE¢TE ONE. ENO & CUT **sour FLARE ... L L TYPICAL PERIMETER FOOTING 3" -6" X 3' -6 X B W /(S) /4 EACH WAY BOTTOM SHRINKAGE JOINT (S.J.) CONSTRUCTION' JOINT (C.J.) r L J HTT22 HOLDOWN PER E /S3 l TO' -2 1/2" r L J L i-- 4' -0 X 2 -IC X B° FO00N5 W /(3) /4 LONGITUDINAL & (5)/4 TRANSVERSE BOTTOM 2' -0 X 2' -O' X B° FOOTING W /(2) 4 EACH WAY BOTTOM '.T. RUCTURAL PER UNIFORM BUILDING CODE ❑ _JN- STRUCTURAL PER UNIFORM BU"_DING CODE El WAG 51- 20 BARRIER -FREE REGULATIONS CRof TUKWILA APPROVED SEP 17 1s7 FOUNDATION PLAN N471E SCALE 1/4 = 1'-0 N , ESE DOCUN.E,S REVIEWED FOR CONFORMANCE WITH THE FOLLOWNG ORDINANCES THE APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONFORMANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE ORDINANCES SUBJECT TO REQUIREMENTS AND INi ERPRETATiONS OF THE GOVERNING AUTHORITY. Daum '• I I • 'D Daw00 I. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 6 3/4 X 6 3 4 X 25 1/2 t$ 5 1/6 x 10 1/2 0.8 5 1 BIX 12 634 X2512161:B 6 3/4 X 25 /2 GIB 2,2X.6 63.4X25f12G18 6 3 4X25:: " (66 Voelker rtrr 5 X 101/2 rsaea��a.= ivaaemYZ2�-,� MARK SHEATHING NAIL SPACING EDGE FIELD 5/8. DIA ABOUT SPA S.KG TO TOP PLATE NAILS 7/17 OSB r4 ea sus 4"e.c. 12. 16o;. P4 7/17 058 0 ,,, 0 , • o,c. if o.c. 37o.c. 164 TOP • r 2 x 6. OHORD NOTCH TRUSS OUT FOR LEDGER 2 X 6 16'o.c. 7/16' OSB SECTION SCALE 3/4 = 1'4r PF26A HANGER 164 24"o.c SHIPSEDHT 7/17 OSB 2 X 4 FLAT BLOCKING • 48c W/(8) Ind NAB 2 6 LEDGER W/(2) led EAtii STUD HI S 48 SHEARWALL PER PLAN AND SCHEDULE GM" Sit SINNISON MEM SS SHEARYIALL PER PLAN AND SCHEDULE \-2 X 6 LEDGER W/ (3) 160 EACH STUD AUGN STUD UNDER TJL TRUSS TYPICAL SIMPSON - HIT22 W/(32) 164 SINKERS INTO (3) slum SECTION SCALE 3/e = r-o" (1) 5/7 ABOLT CONCRETE FDt4 WALL 2 X 6 LEDGER WI (2) 164 EACH STUD 7/16 OSB 2 X 4 N 24.c. 1/4 U a• LAG SCREW AT EACH TRUSS SECTION SCALE 3/4" = 2 X 4 FLAT BLOCKING 0 48 W/(6) 104 NAILS (2) ROWS 104 6"o.c. AUGN STUD UNDER 7,1 TRUSS TYPICAL 84 0 7o.c TRUSS MANUFACTURER TO PROVIDE BLOCKOUT FOR LEDGER P.T. PL WI 5/8" DIA MOLTS 0 47o.c. EXCEPT AS NOTED ON SHOIRWAU. SCHEDULE EMBED r H2.5 0 4,7o 2 X 6 LEDGER W/(2) 164 EACH STUD —' , 4! (3) 14 HORIZONTAL MINIMUM. 10"o c MAX SPACING SECTION S3 2 X EILOCKNG / BREORDER TRUSSES. / NAIL TO TOP PLATES 8/ 164 @ 17o.c. 2 X 6 0 17o.c. LUS24 HANGER 2 X 6 COONS JOSTS 0 24 SCALE 3/4" 7-0" #4 47o.c. X "col 7/16" OSB SECTION U24 HANGERS EACH END SECTION SCALE 3/4. = SCALE 1/2' e POST PER PLAN FILL BLOCKOUT W/CONCRETE AFTER SETTING COLUMN 1,91111P-- 1:11 S CYR OSB T.S. cos PER PLAN (4) 5/7 EXPANSION BOLTS BIRD r (2) $/8 EXPANSION BOLTS AT EXTERIOR SECTION HI EACHUIR SS PER PLAN N FTC PER PLAN RASE PI ATE SCALE 3/4' = 1/4" PL EA SIDE 3/e DIA BOLTS- 3/16 1/4 1 1 6 0t• Pliag -tr4Tetre t tI L — R9C.FWV$ Att ROO Sititutic Ni 0 476.. — SECTION SCALE 3/4. = 1 12" 1 12" 3/4" BASE Pl. TW' Ty, 3/( BASE PL Dein T/ 4 BASE PI ATE 1" NONSHRINK GROUT ( 4000 psi) SIB PER PLAN SECTION 3/4. ERG. PL. T.S. PER PLAN SCALE 3/4- = - 0* CONTINUE SHEATHING TO TOP CF WALL 1/2" GLB PER 3/T61\ 2 W 8, 3/16 V 1/4 SECTION SECTION SCALE 3/4. 1.-o. 1/4" FL EA ROE WI (2) 3/4. DIA BOLTS \— 3/4 BRG. PL — T.S. PER PLAN SCALE 3/4' = 1 SHEARW ALL SCHEDULE NOTES, . NAIL ALL OSEt WALLS SDI 8d COMMON (.131" DIA. NAILS. BLOCK AU, 058 SHEARWALL EDGES 3. TYPICAL ANCHOR ea.Ts. 5/7 0b4 0 47o.c. (EMBED n UNLESS OTHERWSE NOTED. 4- ALL FRANDiG H(11;006 ANFI 0.85 TO BE SNIPSON BRAND OR EQUIVALENT. SIMON NM WM) Mr BOLTS THOU 4 X GOP POST, PROVIDE CUT WASTERS (1) 7/8' 04.80.1 CONCRETE FEN WAIL SZ• " r 5. DO NOT OVERDRIVE NAAS INTO SHEATHING. MIA2Whi MONDE HOLDOONS TO FOUNDATION AT MS OF WALLS WHERE SHOWN 64 PLANS. USE AMU= HOIDOMIS ANTH (32) 164 SINKERS INTO TRIPLE STUDS AT ENDS OF WALL AND 0) 5/8" NOM BOLT INTO CONCRETE WALL. EMBED BOLT ix. SET 1, HOEDOWN BASE DIRECTLY CI4 SILL PL41E. =MINA HOLDONNS INTH (3) VT BOLTS THRU,4.OF 00875 AT ENDS OF • E WALL AND (I) 7,18' ASCHOR BOLT INTO CONCRETE WALL EASED BOLT Ur CITY OF TUKWILA • • APPR0vED SEP 1 7 1 .Y.7 aU,LD;i•,3 GABLE END TRUSS NAILED TO COMMOM ss Vi/ 16d NAILS R 16 o c. 7/16" OUR SHEATH1NO ::: LSU26 HANGER 2 X 4* Tro.c. 2 X 6 BLOCKING WI i6d eo.c. TO LEDGER, Rd 0 Roc. TO SHEATHING 8d 0 6'0.c. 16c1 roc. 2 X 6 BLOCKING 2 BLOCKING 2 X 4 (2) 16d EACH- STUD .\) 7/t6 os a7. 2 X 6 0 # 4 0 Wro.c. (2) / # P.T. PL W/ 5/EF DM &BOLTS 0 48Th. EXCEPT AS NOTED ON SHEAPWALL _ SCHEDULE ERRED 7" - (3) #4 HORIZONTAL M:NM 10o.c. MAXIMUM SPOONS BEAM PER PLAN OP 1 P R F SIMPSON GLT / HANGER SIMPSON CY POST CAP 11-i'1 V) I ; SECTION S4) SCALE 3/4' = 0-o* 04 2 X unt4a 4 ALAS COMMON TRUSSES 24-"o.c. CABLE END TRUSS TO COMMOM uss W/ fed NAILS El 16 o.c. 7/16" OSB SIMPSON CC POST CAP — SIMPSON...La POST BASE tr.ICAT.1., 2 X 4 'X BRACING 0 Vo.c NAIL TO BRACES W/(2) 16d 2 X 4 BRACING 0 Ko.c NAILED TO GABLE END TRUSS W/(2) 16d NAILS - A34 CUP EACH END TYPICAL Ef X Er C°F.TE PLINTH 40/(2) 4 VERTICAL FOOTING PER PLAN 2 X 4 PLAT BLOCHRIC, 4ro.c. W/(6) 105 NAILS WALL TOP PLATES TRUSS MANUFACTURER TO PROVIDE BLOCKOUT FOR DODGER 8d 0 H2.5 48 2 X 6 LEDGER W/(2) / 16d EACH STUD 4*-0 MIN SITTER LENGTH Pr (2) ROWS 16d 0 6'oc, AT LAP SPUCE 8d 0 6'o.o. It I6d S To.c. 7/16 0S8 2 X 4 0 16 25 ROOF SHE THING SCALE 3/4. = 1- 3"- PSF 2.54 OuiestERS W 24'o-c. HI Q EACH ouTRIGGER 2 X 4 e 2400. LAP SPLICE TO VERTICAL wf1U4 NAILS PARAPET TO *It Tote alma OUTUNEC H& M ALL OW0206'17E44 aid; SO:/fflatev PER A .ETT ART5f GRADE 40 FOR #4 ot4k SOl OwDs W #5 AND LARGER. LAP cefiliNuOUS,M RAO& 4 0 VAR_DIMEWIRS, ,4060.44 uNLESs ostonis Nor& pl000k coOtto BAR o TOR ALL WALL MBAR EIEOD. TAIL STEEi. AR oSoisOOOttE101it THE ACI'WONIAL OF STANDAR04*4iltE-OF.OtTAtit R'ElNelectti CONCRETE STRUCTURED. REINTERONG. STEEL • cov000w Sowio TO Op,* TO BE: FOOTINGS • • • 3 INCHES FROO,CSOIL ForiNED stilEADEt .‘ 1/2- INCHEG DITERIoR FAcE___314 INCH STRUCTURAL AND MSC. 5ItEt towmtis- ASV- ,,. i 8 ANCHEXT DOLTS-- MITA. - NOTED STEEL MING soLTs=, uottss moos? • Aix 0718W Sot - A* - .DE;- Eye. nttors., OW' Oeologyoot000s, utosso.oka• , . tft- -.040TOorolo Wife , FOR • K PAG S* DEW - 140tOoksoo pacoosenoo ACcORDANcE EMMEPT MO CT(* oF sks. FOR' MOWS' 8111 • - roWNATIO MOP AfTc 58ECIE8ATICMAF,14 ,TON MAPLE VANS, * cAtroktitt-SPAOs -- Powoor w cot TUBER. ALL sw-uol ,ta DIOS rawitrofW itt TOP OPNNEPMS AO. *nit 18E 1 02 , 01 16 SMOG - - E GR* GRACE r .OZ voat waft MD. WR.$o WIRED 10 OE NE 12 Au 00KG sumo doom* To NAP* doom sums coo s1vo4 woOtir - mot tice 40585 MAD - HOTS REARM 0 4M% WO *JILL OE ROWED OM STANDARD CUT WASHERS. ALL 10300 CctITACT NT1N cencikil 08BS810 WALL BE PRE ALL NS AK 'who* wait* O4ois PEW uot r TRUSSES TRUSS WANEWAFARER GRAIL Stag MCP DRAMIGS AND CALCULATIONS sTA4WED slWeED MO DATER IT( 4 wASNINGION stow ucesot MU(R DEsIGN RCOF FOR GALCIAXITONS TO DVSs ptATEs TO BE ICBO 1 1674ja.Laitii , 0470tarAirealk '• , • t APPROVED. BODE TRUSS BRIODUO LINING AND PLOGIONG FLOOR ARO ROOF WOOD INUSS(SS SHALL BE iNsTALLED WITH ALL BRIDGING, 102 NRA rtiCeD WONG M X BRACING REQUIRED BY THE. TRUSS FatiowArno.malrlowatleoloi TITACRIG WOOD TRUSsE8 COMMENTARY PARS REcCAMENDAtixe. Der SHALL NOT BE GODS THAN THE 000F TRUSSES, BOTTOM efotArook maw SHAu. OE CONNECTED TO TRUSS CHOW *TN TEED *its Boom MAY REINSTALLED FLAT (LARGER DNIENSION H010 cHORD eRACING sHALL Nor EXCEED WWI FEET ON CENTER. Mums WHO SIZE IS Up FOR TRUSSES TO 24' WARIER; 22,3 FOR TRuSSEs To Or ON COM PMHEE x WAGER AT malel#64' SATEEN- FEET ON mots. Burr mum come loioNo so LAP JOINT NM FOUR FOOT PIECE OF swots wmotot 001H.S0( TWA HAIRS EACH END. ___1 PARADE ORAexac mERE REQUIRED RAY FAMicATOR. PLYWOOD TIANSAPS) RODE SHEATHING: TAW 058 WA RATED SHEATHING (2410) ENTOsuRE 1 OR ExIERMeGug. LAY NM IMNIUNfir GRAM BETWEEN PANELS TO ALL4FOR MAW RAIL* SAlVED BE Kid OWN) AT ro.c AT PATWL EDGES MD 12 AT INTERNEDIATE BEAM PER PLAN suPPOTIS. MAW OW WARN* 3/4 2/4 DOG NTA RATED POWOOG (48/24) EXpOSURE 1 OR ExTORAte GIRD. PROS T. AT Lam PAWL EDGES RARING TRIVE HE .58 d (.148 OIANEIER) AT roc. AT PANEL EDGES ANO iro.c. AT INTERMEDIATE SupPORTs. 08108 CRARINGs SWOT 4 SETS UP PRINTS FOR WHEW PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR: ReIrcepfiG sTEEL, STRUCTURAL STEEL MISCELLANEOUS STEFL. DER-4.ANINATED REAms 4040 TRUSSES. GENERAL INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PER Mc SEcTION 108 SPECIAL *SPECTERS ARE MIMED FOR PER Mc 1701 AS FOLLOW CONCRETE CO 7 -TAKE CONCRETE CYLINDERS AS REatXRED FOR CONCRETE sTRENGTHS 400mo TO BE GREATER WM 2O00 PSI. Wiry SLUMP N40 %•-,• r• STR84081. _TYPICAL LAP SPLICE , NoTE: spla AND NALL TFP PLATES AS 040584 AT ALL SCNI 1/2" 1 EXTERIOR, PLOWING ANO S14EARWALLS. St1:0:80' - DittFr Lis - .112' 261 "ispopAn cet- 11"°Gs DePECT HOLE SZE, ow, refrot, GERM OW F$R0c/EDuRE, 08010 WING AND GROAT GROWER NieNoR WETS Pa 4EBAR APPuCATToL • STRODeetS ONLY. ' AESPCMIIIRIFT DF _ . ' O MINI MANUAL STATION, DUAL ACTION, +46" AFF. SMOKE DETECTOR, CEILING MOUNT SMOKE DETECTOR, ABOVE T -BAR CEILING WITH REMOTE LED ON T -BAR CEILING: HEAT DETECTOR, 135 F. FIXED TEMP, CEILING HEAT DETECTOR, 200 F. FIXED TEMP, CEILING 0 (NEAT DETECTOR RATE -OF -RISE AND 135 F. FIXED TEMPERATURE, CEILING. HEAT DETECTOR, RATE -OF -RISE AND 200 F. FIXED TEMPERATURE, CEILING. COMBIN4TIC;N HORN AND STROBE, WALL MOUNT, +80" AFF. COMBINATION MINI -HORN AND STROBE, WALL MOUNT, +80" AFF. STROBE ONLY, WALL MOUNT, +80" AFF. 10" DIA. WP RED VIBRATING BELL ON EXTERIOR WALL SURFACE SMOKE DETECTOR ON AIR DUCT WITH SAMP- LING TUBES 4 REMOTE LED ON T -BAR CLG. END -OF -LINE RESISTOR (EOLR) JUNCTION BOX 3 S 2 0 6 2 96 TYPICAL WIRE SIZE THROUGHOUT CIRCUIT 294 TO OTHER HOPoJS, STROBES 4 BELL 2 96 .. WJ, COOLER 4F AI FD LEAD CALCUI BATTERIES. EQUIFi%4T MARFACTURER TO &OMIT BATTERY CALCULATIONS FOR TIEiR SYSTEM TO R MARSHALL FOR REVIEW LED TYPE REMOTE AMAdJJCIATOR N WIRY VESTIBULE C. 20 42 TO OTHER MANUAL STATIONS - ZONE I SPRINKLER FLOW SWITCH - ZONE 2 SPRINKLER TAMPER SWTCN - ZONE 3 ANSUL SYSTEM FOR TYPE I HOODS - ZOE 4 WJ,FREEZER WALK -INS DETECTION FIRE WIIZc '-O`er 5 TO OTHER DUCT DETECTO% - ZONE, 6 120V PULLER CIRCUIT (K2 -16) TO EACH DUCT DETECTOR 3/4 C. TO TELEPHONE TERMINAL DEDICATED 20 AMP, 120 VOLT CIRCUIT (L -39) FIRE .41-ARM ONE -1-NE OUT B CI STEA KHO USE FIR MECHANICAL I� C EEOLR - ZONE 3 II < EOLR - ZONE 2 - E plRRl( A Fri Dori-- 01 tO N TELENCNE TERMINAL n (1 FIRE 141- 4#'?i°°I I SCALE: 1/4" 1' -0" GENERAL NOTES ! L ALL IMRE SHALL BE THEN -CU AND INSTALLED IN COI$+UR. 2. PAINT ALL BOXES RD AND LABEL BLINK COYERALATE°v WITH 41RE', NORTH AMU ''' REMOTE %MLNCIATOR I RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT CENTER MERRICIIK LENTZ ARC ITEC 1800 — 138th Place N.E., Suite 100 Bellevue, Washington 98005 425/747 -9177 FAX 425/747 -7149 PROJECT NAME SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWLA, WA DRAWING TITLE FIRE 41-ARM 1=1-AN DATE May 23, 1997 DRAWN BY O. Greene CHECKED BY M. Whitney REVISIONS F4-1 NORTH 1-041\11::*C4PE NTN S SCALE: 1".. o 6 io 1) Douel_rrffeas G1.4EST SUITES EXISTING PARKING TO REMAIN (TYR'. 5 CCNCFRETE WAL_K • A nil 100V)Ira towngdps 1112183161,"°u" EX 1 R4 AS ROOF OVERHANG PLATER BE I TEG PL SHO LIGHT POLE_ FL ANT L 1ST EXISTING PARKING 1"4/ NO CHABGE—EX PT AS--145r1:17 TED TER ctr. bocanIc sIze,00crepar,girallark5 TREES Exiting trees to be preserved and protected during construction - In islands detached From -- new planting beds, add grouncicover (4" pots, 15" oe., to match existing tinier. shown otherwise csee notes, - provide maintenanc.e pruning as needed to enhance vee t' health and aestne5.1cs Frazinus pensylvanica Pt/ t\ 2" cal. min., E345, space ae shown, Pasnore Green Ash clear trurk to 5' ht., full 4cer rubrum 'Elowha il'/Doulha II A cai. min., 545, space as shown, Red Maple clear trunk to 5 ht., full Si4RUE3S A Abelia grancliflora 'Edward Goucher'l Edward Goucher Abell a 15" ht. mln., o.c., 511 , w Cit 'Hybricla'/Uhlite fRockroee 15" sp. min, 4' oc. P Cletus / rurpurea'/Orchid Rockross G" p. J Juniperus c. 'Toruloeali-bllywood Juniper 24" ht. Mr, 6' 04. 0 Mahonia aquifollum . Compacta . / Compact Oregon-grape 2 gal can min., 2-1/2' ob. Nanclina domestics 'Compacta': Compact Heavenly O Osmanthus delavayiRslavay Oemantkus M Pints mugo mugo/Tlugho Pine. L Prunus lucitamca/Portugal Laurel ✓ Prunus I. 'Mt. Vemon'/Mount Vernon Laurel C...ROUNDCOVER 111j111:1111j11 Arctostaphylos uva-urei/KinnilSnnick Junlperus h 'UJilto5iV5lue Carpet Juniper / ///2, Rubus pentaloba/Takean Creeping Rub. 2 gai. can min., 2-1/2' c.c. 15 ht. 55., 4' o.c. 15" sp. min., 4' oo. 24" ht. R. 5• pc., full 15" sp. mkt, 4' o.c., 4 pot, 15" o.c., plant in triangular pattern j I gal. can, 2' o.c., plant in triangular pattern 4" pot, 15" o.c, plant in triangular pattern j j EXISTING; TREE AND PLANTER To REMA1N , EXISTS ,HYDRANT 5 TALL OMU ?ALL TRASH` ENCLOSURE EXISTS LT. POLE TO REMAIN STAKING PLAN STATE OF . WASHINGTON REGIGTERED LANDSCAPE AFXHITECT HERMINA EHRLICH CERTIFICATE 1411 385 TREE STAKES HOSE TREE WIRE HERMINA '- EHRLICH DESIGNS krdsccpe crctiteckre & site pkrring 713 north 73 street seatte, wa 98D3 • Ph 206-784-8604 Fx, 206-789-8955 TYPICAL ALL PLANTS • PLANTS. PIT TWO TIMES CF ROOT !SALL • PRUNE ALL DISEASED AND ERCKEN BRaNCRES • PLANTS* SOIL MIX 50 55 2/3 TOP 1/3 0554515 HAT V2" SLACK HOSE ill/ 2 STRAND I2GA TWISTED WIRE 3-2"X2"XS-0" STAKES SECURELY DRIvEN INTO GROUND. CCMPACTED PL45TINO S TAMPED PLANTING SOIL MIX UNGLAZED PLANT PIT SURFACE TREES SHRUBS TYPICAL PLANTING ETAILS NOT TO SCALE Dq NOTES t rti - 51 and to soil S In min GI In all planting areas exce ex pt at existing trees accomodate existing grades at root crown I. Ro ot exis ng so p ace p . . eep 2. Fla./t155 4155 e. shall rece,e at least 2 in. of mulch. 3. Dg plant pita a minimum of 2 51555 the size of the rootball or container. Prune all diseased or broken branches. Plants shall conform to the 4. lthere existing 55035/3045'55 covere less than 300 of detached planting areas containing existing tre., plant antire area with Kinnikinnick 5. The Contractor shall maintain the landscape work. from the date of the First Installation until 555/ acceptance tout in no case lees than 90 days, Groundcovers shall be installed continuously under t5555 and shrubs. latest edition of "American Standards for Nursery Stock." It . the Cc5tractor. responelbility to determine duantiti. based on the plant 1St. 6, The Contractor shall provide protection of all property, persons. Sark In progreme, structures, utilities, walks, cure5 and paved surface. during *--).-1.- PERMIT CENTER installation of landscape work. Verify, and protect, the locations of all existing and proposed underground utiliti55 prior to connencernnet of the work. MERRIC LENT ARC ITEC, 1800 — I38th Place NZ., Suite 100 - Bellevue. Washington 98005 208/747-3177 FAX 208/747-7149 • PROJECT NAME SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA, WA DRAWING TITLE LANDSCAPE PL,ANT INC, PLAN DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY REVISIONS . MAY 21, 1991 1. 8-4-91 per City comments CITY L -EXISTING PARKING TO REMAIN (TYP.) — 5" CbNCRETE,WALK Zone ✓ata volume Zone I 20.6 g pm Zone 2 24.1 gpm Zone 3 15.1 gpm Zone 4 IT.e' gpm 0 4 XISTIN&.S�•► IRRIGATION SCHEDULE DOMESTIC WATER METER • Water meter installed by others IRRIGATION WATER METER ■ I" deduct water meter installed by others TIE -IN ASSEMBLY I" Febco 2 double check valve assembly • i" Wilkins 600 Pressure Reducing Waive 3/4" quick coupling valve for winterizaton AUTOMATIC RAN SHUTOFF - Toro Rain Switch and Bypass Switch locate as .directed on roof ZONE VALVES 3 Toro I" Electric Remote - Control Valves- 252 -06 -04 see Zone Data below for sizes . ISTINE o R.EmAliN STATE OF • WASHINGTON REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT HERMINA EHRLICH CERTIFICATE NO. 385 CONTROLLER Toro Vision H 6- Station Interior Controller - 159 -66 -02 kA locate as directed in Electrical Room - HERMiNA EHRLICH DESIGNS landscape ard 8c site pkrnbg 713 north 73 street seat - e. we 98103 Ph, 206- 784 - 8604 Pic, 206- 789 -8955 WRte2 I DIA. REMAIN 25.0 of Gk - 1 ,613 3 RECEIVED SEP 1 6 1997 TUKWjLA PUBLIC wCRKS PIPE - - -2" Schedule 40 PVC main line pipe Class 200 PVC lateral pipe - 3/4" unless otherwise indicated Sleeves Schedule 40 PVC under all pavement (not shown) size to be two pipe sizes larger than pipe contained place bare copper wire in all sleeves I -1/2" wire sleeve (not shown) under all pavement, through walls and where main line not present HEADS - half unless otherwise indicated use PCDs as needed to reduce arcs o Toro 5' Spray - 510Z- 6P- 5 -x -PC ® Toro 6' Spray - 510Z- 61F- S -x -PC A Toro 10' Spray - 510Z- 6P- 10 -x -PC • Toro 15' Spray - 510Z- 6P- 15 -x -PC - VAN.- Toro 510 V -15, 15' variable angle nozzle Operational Data I. DRAWING IS PIAC5RAMATIC. - Common ditch where possible. 2. Available pressure 145 pal (verify) Design pressure = 40 psi. 3: It is the Contractor's responsibility to determine quantities. 4. it Is the _Contr4ctor's. responsibility to conform to the requirements of e overntne .agencies. RECEIVED • - CITY OF TUKWILA PEPMiT'cesrs5 DRAWING TITLE " " -. DATE MAY BY HE CHECKED BY REVISIONS` REVISIONS: REVISED BOUNDARY, UTILITY CALL OUTS, 08 -15 -97 MDK. =B .L T R _E GUEST SUITES 6 " .DOWN SPOUT- TIGHT UNE (TYP.) COALESCING PLATE OIL /WATER SEPARATOR LOT 1 OF PROPOSED BINDING SITE PLAN 1:11 -010 BOUNDARY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY J. BECKER & ASSOCIATES 6108 COMMUNITY PLACE S.W. SUITE 2 TACOMA, WA 98499 PHONE: (253) 9847651 S 0025 ° 5!' E 1500.0E ,z ,0 k _.. RE t+e C1 C2 C3 C4 LOT 2 OF PROPOSED BINDING SITE PLAN DDCV ASSEMBLY IN VAULT. DOMESTIC WATER METER W/PRV GREASE INTERCEPTOR TRASH ENCLOSURE 6" SS SIDE SERVICE 12" ST 6" DOWN SPOUT TIGHT UNE (TYP.) CB #3 SSMH #1 8" SS 24 "0 STEEL CASING SHEET INDEX COVER, SHEET — COMPOSITE UTILITIES DEMOLITION / TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN GRADING, DRAINAGE AND UTIUTIES PLAN DETAILS, SANITARY SEWER PROFILE AND SPECIFICATIONS. These plans have been reviewed by the Public Works Department for conformance with current City standards. Acceptance is subject to errors and omiceens which do not authorize violations of ada22tc0 r.'.andards or ordinances. The responsibility for the adequacy of the design rests total h! with the designer. Additions, deletions or revisions to these drawings after this date will void this acceptance and will require a resubmittal of revised drawings for subsequent approval: Fi ';'ce is subject to field inspection by th d rl ;s utilitie Inspector. Dategtrgcn By. 0—(1 kr SCALE: r - 40' NICINrry MAP W. PACIFIC E ENGINEERINGDESION IOC" .0 tie Aism SEEK EELizr a rea • RILLt BASIS OF BEARING (ASSUMED) 'R, r. «Rn. • .,b 1 er s 7tt B ROS. 1 ',. 1nY mW b rnpXiy,W_by TXlM1AS �BROS. MAPS. tt N ,., w"nn m wvr. W «v.or, ar «. mr : aa,or, .n,Nw far P�^^� uee « rada iHthauf Pmmbeion.' BENCHMARK: NORTH RIM OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE LOCATED ON WEST SIDE OF SOUTH CENTER PARKWAY, APPROX. 60' WEST OF SW COR OF SITE (27.29) BENCHMARK DERIVED FROM MEASURE UP FROM INVERT ELEV. DEPICTED ON PLANS BY FUJKI AND ASSOC. OF "SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION LLD. 32 DATED: 6/10/88 (ASSUMED) UTILITIES LOCATE NOTE THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTIUTIES SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE FIELD AND FROM RECORDS. JCA ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBIUTY FOR EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN HEREON. CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED TO VERIFY THE EXACT SIZE, DEPTH AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTIUTIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL FOR UNDERGROUND LOCATE AT 1—M-424-5555 — 424 -5555 PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. GENERAL NOTES 1. A PRE— CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE CITY OF TUKWILA INSPECTION PERSONNEL SHALL BE HELD PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL SITE WORK IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE APPROVED PLANS. ANY DEVIATION FROM THESE PLANS WILL REQUIRE PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER. ENGINEER AND APPROPRIATE PUBLIC AGENCIES. A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 3. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST W.S.D.O.T. /A.P.W.A. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR MUNICIPAL PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARD STANDARDS, DATED: 12/02/96. 4. ALL LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED BY FIELD SURVEY OR OBTANED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE ONLY AND NOT NECESSARILY COMPLETE IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INDEPENDENTLY VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF THE UTIUTY LOCATIONS SHOWN AND TO FURTHER DISCOVER AND AVOID ANY OTHER UTILITIES NOT SHOWN HEREON WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THIS PLAN. BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION, CALL 1- 800 -424 -5555 FOR FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS, WIDTHS, THICKNESSES, AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING PAVEMENTS AND STRUCTURES THAT ARE TO INTERFACE WITH NEW WORK. PROVIDE ALL TRIMMING, CUTTING. SAW CUTTING, GRADING. LEVELING. SLOPING, COATING. AND OTHER WORK, INC?UDTNG MATERIALS AS NECESSARY, TO CAUSE THE INTERFACE WITH EXISTING WORKS TO BE PROPER, ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF KENNEWWCK, COMPLETE IN PLACE AND READY TO USE. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP EXISTING TRAFFIC LANES CLEAR FOR SAFE PEDESTRIAN/VEHICULAR TRAFFIC FLOW AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ADEQUATE SAFEGUARDS, SAFETY DEVICES, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT, CONFINED SPACE PROTECTION, FLAGGERS, AND ANY OTHER NEEDED ACTIONS TO PROTECT THE UFE, HEALTH. AND SAFETY OF THE PUBIC, AND TO PROTECT PROPERTY IN CONNECTION WWTH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK DEPICTED ON THESE PLANS. 8. EXISTING STORM 'DRAINAGE AND SANITARY SYSTEMS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AT ALL TIMES. NO SILT —LADED RUNOFF IS TO BE DISCHARGED TO THE PUBUC STORM SYSTEM. D ThO!O RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS • lExpom . AUG. 4, 1998 REVISIONS: ADDED CHANNELIZATION IN SOUTH CENTER PARKWAY, 08 -15 -97 MDK. o C , :! co - - PROTECT INLETS WITH FILTER FABRIC DURING CONSTRUTION. - (TYPICAL) oo CV' EX 12' HP 5i2 PETPOLWUI P,•P L, JG 449•7' SAW CUT AND REMOVE EXISTIN A.C. PAVEMENT WITHIN SHADED AREAS, (TYPICAL). PROTECT INLETS WITH FILTER -- FABRIC DURING CONSTRUTION. (TI'PK{AL) I, RELOCATE EX. LIGHT STANDARD. . , PROTECT INLETS WITH FILTER \' ' FABRIC URING CONSTRUTION ( TYPICAL) SAW CUT AND REMOVE EX!STING'A.C: PAVEMENT, EGG AND. PLANTERS. IN SHADED AREAS, (TYPICAL), ;\ N 00'57'48" W �I I I0 I GO . z I *TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BARRIER STRA BALES WIRED TOGETHER END TO EN TO CREATE 200LF(±) CHAIN. (TO B MAINTAINED UNTIL NEW PAVE NT HAS BEEN INSTALLED.) . LIMITS O.F! CLEARING/ • RECONSTR�JC - DON (TYP.) 025'58"1 E EXISTING TREE PLANTER, TO REMAIN. .LIMITS OF CLEARING/ RECONSTRUCTION (TYP.) / RELOCATE EX. UGH *.sr` ARD. PETRCL GAS —_ -- - - t3 SCALE: 1 = 2O In BASIS OF BEARING: Z (ASSUMED) UTILITIES LOCATE NOTE I E PACIFIC ENGINE R NGDESIGN INC. o BENCHMARK: N NORTH RIM OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE LOCATED ON WEST SIDE OF SOUTH CENTER PARKWAY, APPROX. 60' WEST OF SW COR OF SITE (27.29) BENCHMARK DERIVED FROM MEASURE UP FROM INVERT ELEV. DEPICTED ON PLANS BY FUJIKI AND ASSOC. OF "SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION L.I.D. 32 "' DATED: 6/10/88 (ASSUMED) THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM THE FIELD AND FROM RECORDS. JKA ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN HEREON. CONTRACTOR IS ADVISED TO VERIFY THE EXACT SIZE, DEPTH AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL FOR UNDERGROUND LOCATE AT 1- 800 - 424 -5555 PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SAW CUT AND REMOVE EXISTING A.C. PAVEMENT WITHIN SHADED AREAS, (TYPICAL). EX. LIGHT STANDARD TO BE REMOVED. PROTECT INLET WITH FILTER FABRIC DURING CONSTRUTION (TYPICAL) TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES DEPICTED ON SHEET C2 ARE INTENDED TO BE A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT TO MEET ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. AS CONDITIONS DICTATE, THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD ANTICIPATE THAT MORE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL FACILITIES WILL BE NECESSARY TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING THE SITE OR ENTERING THE PUBUC STORM SYSTEM. DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, IT SHALL BE THE OBLIGATION AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO ADDRESS ANY NEW CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE CREATED BY HIS ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FACILITIES, OVER AND ABOVE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS, AS MAY BE NEEDED TO PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND WATER QUAUTY. 2. *BARRIER MAY BE DELETED AT THE DISCRETION OF CITY INSPECTOR IF SITE AND WEATHER CONDITIONS WARRANT IT. NOTES: 1 EXISTING 12" DIA. HIGH PRESSURE STEEL PETROLEUM PIPE IS AT COVER DEPTH OF 3' TO 5' PER TRACEY GREEN OF OLYMPIC PIPELINE COMPANY. OLYMPIC PIPELINE REQUESTS 41 HOURS NOTICE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION NEAR THIS UNE (206- 246 -0247) 2 REFER TO TRIAD ASSOCIATES PLANS FOR EXISTING STORM SYSTEM. CATCH BASIN //1 AS SHOWN ON SHEET C -2 OF DOUBLETREE SOUTH CENTER CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS BY TRIAD ASSOCIATES DATED 4/11/79 WAS NOT FOUND DURING FIELD TOPOGRAPHY BUT IS DEPICTED HEREON AS PER PLANS. 3 ONSITE WATER MAINS DEPICTED HEREON ARE BASED ON 4/11/79 TRIAD PLANS. - TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY INFORMATION PROVDED j yAOFTUKWILA -JOHN KNOWL-ES --&-- ASSOCIATES, INC. 604 - 7TH AVENUE N.W. PUYALLUP, WA 98371 PHONE: (206) 840 -0232 PERMIT CENTER J _ 0 w 2 5. p Ir 2 8 w 0 Z U - 97-02 PROJECT NO. ChM/ DRAWN BY 06 -09-97 ISSUE DATE 08/15/97 SHEET REVISION CIVIL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS CB {)5 (TYPE II -4V0) W/ SOLID. 24-0. LOCKING Lam. FLOW SPUTTER CATCH BASIN (SEE DETAIL, SHEET C4) RIM= 29.80 INV. (6 SE) = 24.04 - INV.(Ex. 15" NE. - SW) - 20.90 (INSTALL OVER EXISTING STORM UNE) 13LF 6' N -12 s= 0.0150 CB 11TYPE 11 =4'0)= RIM= 33.65 INV. 02 S) = 21.29 {INSTALL OVER EX. /STORM LINE) GAS'METER.} MECH. PLANS FOR METER- AND SERVICE SIZE. BLDG. CLEAN OUT p.. INV.= 28.60 GRAY WATER ONLY. I f BLACK - WATER ONLY. 1 J� J BLDG. c ANrOU'F• r INV.= 28.60.1 a ©1UT A6 � I� - -� 0,144 [BOO l d FF- 32.60 REMOVE APPRO)L 132LF OF EX. 12' STORM AFTER INSTALLING I NEW STORM UNE AROUND THE BUILDING AS- SH011N: 4' PVC F00110 co CB': 2 (TYPE 1I -48'0) W/ 19 SCUD, 24'0, LOCKING UD. RIM= 34.E t p INV. (12" N, W) = 21.21 4 6'!I PVC ji i� S 0.01+50 100LF 6' PVC SS S. SVC. S= 0.0606 1331F 8' PVC S= 0.0050 REVISIONS: REVISED CALL OUTS, ADDED CHANNELIZATION, REVISED WATER, 08- 15 - -97 MDK. - 1 Ol 449.37' NJ - o 5748" Ki Ex 72- NP STL PE;Ra:L PIPEL/Nc INSTALL COALESCING PLATE OIL/WATER SEPARATOR VAULT WITH TRAFFIC BEARING UD. (SEE DETAIL„ SHEET C4) RIM= 29.90 INV.= 2186 (IN. OUT) CB #4 (TYPE II -48'0) W/ SDUD, 24'0, LOCKING UD. RIM= 29.55 * INV. (6" N, E) = 23.16 INV (12 " 6. SE) - 20.66 ROOF & FOOTING DRAIN CONNECTION'POINT. OMER STORM UNE)' EXISfiI ACTFOUND f7�LP) L PISF T - _. REPNR/PATCH PAVEMENT PER. CITY OF 7 STD. D R # RS -3. *NOTE __ PE CPCANrPREPARED 5Y �RlAD _ __ ASSOCIATES FOR THE ORIGINAL DOUBLETREE GUEST SUITES HOTEL PROJECT, THIS CB IS EQUIPPED WITH AN-9 - /WATER- SEPARATOR TEE. FIELD VERIFY EXISTENCE OF SEPARATOR. IF NO SEPARATOR IS FOUND, ONE MUST BE INSTALLED PER CITY OF TUKWILA STANDARDS. PETROL _ -,_ - T- GAS-- _-- _ PACIFIC N IN ERINK ESIGN INC. CONNECT NEW 8' SS MAIN AT EX. SSMH, INV.= 18.97. POST INDICATOR VALVE 1 6° FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECT. 1- DETECTOR DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY IN VAULT, PER CITY CF TUKWILA STANDARD DETAIL #WS -11. NOTE DCVA AND FIRE SPRINKLER SUPPLY UNE TO BE SIZED BY OTHERS. (FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM IS A 'DESIGN BUILD' SYSTEM UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT.) 1 -1 1/2' DOMESTIC WATER METER WITH 2 BLDG. SERVICE ( es- 8 T OF TUKWILA STANDARD DETAILS pis 15 AND .) 1 -2' PRV IN GROUND BOX PER CITY OF TUKWILA SIDS. CONNECT TO EXISTING GAS. COORDINATE WITH PUGET SOUND ENERGY FOR SERVICE CONNECTION. TRASH ENCLOSURE GREASE INTERCEPTOR VAULT. PER CITY OF TUKWILA STANDARD DETAIL '/ SS -12. (SEE MECHANICAL PLANS SHEET M3 FOR DESIGN DETAILS.) 6' CLEAN OUT RIM= 32.90 INV.= 25.87 INV. (6") = 24.96 CB t/3 (TYPE IL - 48'0) RIM= 30.70 INV. (12" E. W) = 20.78 1 - 1' IRRIGATION METER. (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET U FOR DETAILS OF IRRIGATION DESIGN.) 32LF 12' N -12 SEE CROSS - SECTION, SHEET C4. S= 0.0039 SSM11 in (TYPE II - 48'0) RIM= 29.15 INV. (6" IN) = 19.81 INV. (a" oUT)= 19.64 These plans have been reviewed by the Public Works Department for conformance with cum.,; City standards. Acceptance is subject to errors and omissions which do not authorize viol'.'. r r of adopted standards or ordinances. The recc. ty for the adequacy of the design rests tot, rash the designer. Additions, deletions or revlu r- . to these drawings after this date will vcid this acceptance and will require a resubc:ltial of revised drawings for subsequent approval. Final ; oceptance is subject to field inspection by the i=_.;;IC Works utilities inspector. Date: l(*/NT? BYt k1 I, 111 CAUTION !H CONTRACTOR TO POT HOLE PETRO UNE AND EX. 10' WATER MAIN CROSSING TO VERIFY DEPTH AND LOCATION PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRLJTIO. PROVIDE 6' MIN. SEPARATION. NOTIFY ENGINEER IF CONFLICTS EXIST. NOTE: SANITARY SEWER CROSSING IOF SOUTH CENTER PARKWAY TO BE BORED. BORE AND JACK FROM UPSTREAM END. WITH 24' DIA. STEEL CASING PIPE. - SEE D71. SHT C4 MIAh ,rMf /mulNf NIGHT TIME WORK FROM 10 P.M. TO 7 A.M. WILL BE OWED FOR BORING NARKI IN THE RIGHT -OF -WAY. FOR POT HOUNG OPERATIONS IN THE NORTHBOUND DIRECTION, THE STANDARD HOURS OF 9 A.M. TO 3 P.M. SHALL BE USED. PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS SHALL BE UNRESTRAINED AT ALL TIMES. ONLY ONE NORTHBOUND' LANE MAY BE CLOSED AT ANY OVEN TIME DURING THE NON - WORKING HOURS, THE PITS) SHALL BE COI,EREDWITH A STEEL PLATE AND COVERED MTH A COLDIMIX ASPHALT. : APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A' TRAFFIC CO•#TROL PLAN TO \ PUBLIC WORKS FOR APPROVAL TEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE t ICEMEINE OF ANY Wf1(YIC NAIHIN THE OTY RIGHT- RECEweo CITY OF TUKWILA OF - WAY. PROJECT - NO. Duw PERMIT CENTER CIVIL ENGINEERING AN PLANNING CONSULTAN REVISIONS: REVISED SEWER PROFILE, ADDED CASING SECTION, 08- 15 -97. MDK. GRADING AND STORM DRAINAGE NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST. EDITION OF THE APWA /WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION, OR. AS MODIFIED BY CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, DATED DATED: 12/02/96. 2. IT SHALL 13E THE. SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN STREET USE AND ANY OTHER RELATED PERMITS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. 3. LOCATIONS OF ROADWAYS, BUILDINGS AND PARKING AREAS SHOWN HEREON ARE APPROXIMATE. FOR DIMENSIONED LOCATIONS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS, REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN. IMPROVEMENT AND STRUCTURE LOCATIONS SHALL BE FIELD SET BY THE SURVEYOR AS REQUIRED. 4. THE FACILITIES SHOWN ON THE APPROVED EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLANS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED /IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO ANY EXTENSIVE GRADING OR LAND CLEARING IN ACCORDANCE - IBTH. THAT PLAN. THESE FACILITIES MUST BE SATISFACTORILY MAINTAINED UNTIL CONSTRUCTION AND LANDSCAPING IS COMPLETED AND THE POTENTIAL FOR ON -SITE EROSION HAS PASSED. 5. DESIGN GRADES SHOWN ON SHT. C3 REPRESENT THE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF APPROXIMATE MINIMUM EARTHWORK AND OTHER GRADING /SOIL CONSIDERATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR MAY ALTER THE GRADES SHOWN TO. BETTER ACHIEVE THESE RESULTS PROVIDED THAT ANY ALTERATION IS SUBJECT TO THE PRIOR APPROVAL IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER, OWNER, AND THE APPROPRIATE CITY OF TUKWILADEPARTMENTS. 6. THE RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED IN THE SOILS REPORT PREPARED BY DATED SHALL BE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. WHERE CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE SOILS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS ANDTHIIS DESIGN APPEAR, THE ENGINEER SHALL BE CONTACTED FOR RESOLUTION. 7. ALL EARTHWORK UNDER PAVING TO BE USED BY VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY ASTM D 1557. 8. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN IN PAVED AREAS ARE TOP OF PAVING. 9. ALL PARKING, DRIVEWAY AND LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST A 1.0% SLOPE TOWARD. THE NEAREST STORM DRAINAGE INTERCEPTION/ CONVEYANCE SYSTEM. PLAN DETAILS•OR FIELD MODIFICATIONS SHALL NOT. SUPERSEDE THIS REQUIREMENT. 10. EXTRUDED CEMENT CONCRETE CURBING, WHERE SPECIFIED, SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA STANDARDS AND DETAILS OR DETAILS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP OFF -SITE STREETS CLEAN AT ALL TIMES BY SWEEPING. WASHING OF THESE STREETS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHOUT PRIOR CITY OF TUKWILA APPROVAL. 12. ALL SURPLUS OR UNSUITABLE MATERIALS CLEARED OR EXCAVATED AND REMOVED FROM THE SITE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN AN APPROVED FILL SITE. IT WILL BE THE PERMITTEE'S RESPONSIBILITY TO LOCATE AN ACCEPTABLE DISPOSAL SITE AND TO ASSURE THAT ALL SURPLUS MATERIAL IS PROPERLY DEPOSITED IN SAME. 13. ALL PIPE SHALL BE LAID ON A PROPERLY PREPARED FOUNDATION ACCORDING TO THE APWA /WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE, AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION SECTIONS 7 -02.3, 7 -03.3, AND 7 -04.3. THIS SHALL INCLUDE NECESSARY LEVELING OF THE TRENCH BOTTOM OR THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION MATERIAL AS WELL AS PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION OF REQUIRED BEDDING MATERIAL TO UNIFORM GRADE SO THAT THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE PIPE WILL BE SUPPORTED ON A UNIFORMLY DENSE NONYIELDING BASE. IF THE NATIVE MATERIAL IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR "GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR PIPE BEDDING," THE FIRST LIFT OF PIPE BEDDING MAY BE OMITTED, PROVIDED THE MATERIAL IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH IS LOOSENED, REGRADED AND COMPACTED TO FORM A DENSE NONYIELDING BASE. 14. ALL PIPE BEDDING FOR RIGID CULVERT AND STORM PIPE (I.E. CONCRETE, STEEL AND ALUMINUM) SHALL CONFORM TO APWA / WSDOT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 9- 03.12(3). ALL OTHER PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE EITHER APWA TYPE "F" FOR FLEXIBLE PIPE (I.E. PVC, CMP OR ADS), OR APWA TYPE "B" FOR DUCTILE IRON PIPE. 15. ALL TRENCH BACKFILL IN AREAS OF FUTURE PAVEMENT OR STRUCTURAL LOADING SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% OF THE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AS DETERMINED BY ASTM D 1557. ALL OTHER AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 9015 16. ALL BUILDING ROOF DRAIN DOWNSPOUTS AND FOOTING DRAINS SHALL BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE MAIN STORM DRAINAGE CONVEYANCE SYSTEM THROUGH AN UNDERGROUND PIPE SYSTEM. ROOF DRAINS AND FOOTING DRAINS SHALL BE SEPARATE SYSTEMS AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF 4" (OR 6" DIAMETER WHERE SHOWN) RIGID PVC PIPE (NONPERFORATED FOR ROOF DRAINS, PERFORATED FOR FOOTING DRAINS). SUFFICIENT CLEANOUTS AND BENDS SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT THE SYSTEM CAN BE EASILY MAINTAINED. THE SYSTEM SHOWN HEREON IS SCHEMATIC ONLY. THE DRAINAGE /GRADING CONTRACTOR OR LANDSCAPER MAY ALTER THE LAYOUT AS REQUIRED TO BETTER DRAIN THE SITE, WITH PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP A DIMENSIONED RECORD OF THE LOCATION OF ALL PIPES AND CLEANOUTS AND SUBMIT SAME TO THE ENGINEER AND OWNER UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK. MONOUTHIC CURB AND SIDEWALK. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET. pq g0 EXTERIOR WALL SEE ARCH. PLANS FOUNDATION WALL -SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS 5 =2.0% MIN 2 "(±) 6. PROVIDE MINIMUM 3' -6" OF COVER , - VER WATERMAIN. 2 "(±) 4" PERF PVC FOOTING DRAIN - (CONNECT TO STRUCTURE PER PLANS) 6.0' - 18.0' (TO FACE OF CURB) :DOWNSPOUT PVC CAP 2 "(±) SANITARY SEWER AND WATER.NOTES 1. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, DATED; .12/02/96, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY BUILDING STRIKING LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS OF WATER AND SEWER SERVICES WITH ARCHITECTURAL /PLUMBING PLANS. ALL SIDE. SEWERS SHALL BE 6" DIAMETER MINIMUM AND LAID. ON A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 2 %. SIDE SEWERS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A CLEANOUT AND TEST TEE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE INVERT ELEVATION OF -THE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE AND 6" MAIN PRIOR TO SIDE SEWER CONNECTION. 5.. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND INSTALL WATER SERVICE LINES FITTINGS AND METER SETTINGS. CITY WILL PROVIDE AND INSTALL WATER METERS. CONTACT CITY WATER DISTRIBUTION SUPERVISOR TO SCHEDULE METER INSTALLATION. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS C-900 PVC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.:. FIRE SERVICE AND DOUBLE -CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY TO BE INSTALLED BY CERTIFIED FIRE PREVENTION CONTRACTOR. 4" PVC (TYP) 6 x 4° TEE INTO TIGHTLINE DOWNSPOUT TO TIGHTLINE 0.5' NEW A.C. PAVEMENT NOTE' ADS N -12 FLEX -PIPE MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF PVC WHERE JURISDICTIONS ALLOW. FINISHED GRADE (PROVIDE POSITIVE SLOPE•AWAY FROM BLDG) -} - /'' 6" PVC TIGHTLINE (SDR 35 •.1 rt UNDER PAVEMENT). -4- - -[ CONNECT 10 PERMANENT • DRAINAGE STRUCTURE OR DAYLIGHT PER GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FREE. DRAINING MATERIAL (AS REQUIRED) CONNECT NEW 8.:SS MAIN AT EX: SSMH, INV:= 18.97. 26.0' (MIN.) DRIVE TO REMAIN CLEAR OF ANY EX:.:10 '.WATER EX :72 0 HIGH: PRESSURE PETRQ LINE- (FIELD VERIFY .DEPTH AND. . LOCATION.) 1 133LF 8" P.V.0 .. S =: 0 0050 2.0' OVERHANG APPROX.:8055: 24 "0 STEEL ;CASING, 1.5" R. 1 +00 PARKING SSMH #1 (TYPE 11:-48"0) . PER CITY OF TU(<WILA STD, .DETAIL .# SS -4 RIM 29:00 -. ... . INV: (6" i6) _ 19.8 GREASE.: I N TERCEPSE R ..VAULT:.: P.. ER - OF TUKWLA• STANDARD ;DETAIL : # SS -12. (SIZE AND :EXACT LOCATION -TO BE DESIGNED 8Y: OTHERS.: SEE : MECHANICAL: PLANS, SHEET M3) .. 2+00 6.0` WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6" CLEANOUT RIM=' 32.90 INV.= 25.87 INV:=' •3.8. 2.0' OVERHANG I PROJECT NO. DJW 06-09-97 ISSUE 0 6-09 -97 ISSUE DATE 08/15/97' SHEET REVISION OVERHANGS OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS 13.0' WIDE DRIVE LANE S =2.0% MN. - rt 2' COMPACTED DEPTH OF CLASS '6' A.C. 4" .COMPACTED DEPTH OF 1" ( -) A.T.B. ALT: 4" COMPACTED DEPTH OF 1" ( -) CRUSHED AGGREGATE. COMPACT SUBGRADE TO 95% OF MAX. DENSITY. PAVEMENT CROSS - SECTION 13.0' WIDE DRIVE LANE SEE SHEET C2 FOR LOCATION OF SAW- CUT UNE. a ss 2.0% MIN. I I 2" COMPACTED DEPTH OF CL. "B ", A.C. 4 COMPACTED DEPTH OF A.T.B. 1 "(-) ALTERNATE: 4" OF CRUSHED AGGREGATE COMPACT SUBGRADE TO 95% OF MAXIMUM .DENSITY ECC / PAVEMENT SECTION 2.0' OVERHANG - 18.0' (TO FACE OF CURB) 9.0' WIDE x 18' LONG PARKING STALL (STANDARD) EXISTING A.C. PAVEMENT 1.0' MONOLITHIC CURB AND SIDEWALK LADDER (PER CITY OF TUKWILA STD. DETAILS) EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEV.= 24.54 H= 0.21' INV. (s• cur = 24.04 UFT ROD (PER CITY OF TUKWLA STD. DETAILS) INV.(Ex.:V INI= 20.90 EXISTING GRADE 8 "0 PVC SANITARY SEWER LINE. GRAS, (TYPE II - 54 "0) WITH SOLID, 24 - 0, LOCKING LID RIM = 29.80 BOTTOM ELEV.= 18.90 FLOW SPLITTER CATCHBASIN 24 "0 STEEL SLEEVE. FILL VOID WITH SAND AND SEAL WITH HIGH DENSITY FILL OR NON - SHRINK GROUT AT BOTH ENDS OF SLEEVE. -- ENCASEMENT CROSS- SECTION 8 a 4 o=d ovo 4" DEPTH OF PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE. 4" COMPACTED DEPTH OF 1'(- )CRUSHED AGGREGATE COALESCING PLATE OIL /WATER SEPARATOR - e==== P ACIFIC E ENGINEERINcDESIGN INC. STRAP TO WALL NEW 6" PVC STORM TO COALESCING PLATE OIL /WATER SEPARATOR. 0 45 CFS ® H= 0.21' 15" CMP RISER WITH OPEN TOP ,111uuilffr Q(WOO = Qcw) - 0.45 CFS INV.(E%. is- an = 20.50 SHEAR GATE (PER CITY OF TUKWILA STD. DETAILS) PERMIT CENTER RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA 97-02 CIVIL- ENGINEERING AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS I rl ✓.,, TEc Z3.a 0 + DO Ir►Je 23,42 I '3 3 ►- s b. t P WITH DJCT«E fVOOJ OrT SIDC DROP P6c STO DTL 114 b" 90 6Er1D IEfX N — 108 4= z3,75 T =ZS.49 I F3= 21.04 b%le• !/nc /7,es Za4 Fa /37" �,'ci� Su�✓�/ 1,-f, 51155 (f sINCs orGO t s�42-o55 Narg.s s r3 tsrR c . rra ?Ai/ ,fir." cLEp,�(rgi,v} x rata 4 i PER. LITf I'D DTL* SS -4 I Z-064 z fl,ofl 5 1 21,19 Ir,Y (5 oarh (t 3D I. 0 E - srt cffr Tu U'Y �.u�t; '72DJ LI-I (Z 3' .213 o'7 *on� 4� Tu4fi , e Saw GJf �) 2 . 6OTO sip's of To ge cdw CQ( ,4T SAoie T, ,E Ta Pit A. WI LE' pd,zA.'tTO,) OF J6 c izowas, PPGo /IO6 O - 0 I'R- PEA GROW r) of pi �E. 4 rNAOLgE, -(__ J t ' t c o (Sro JEwh MO( 4i oo 120 �i E4ua�� 5, LO0e--,J•SEAL INIAU MOLI AT ( P6r) 67∎ , - AT,OA-; of CUTSIUE Deaop. zo' 1 Cab ®F D I,P 0,/ F4O OJzos �, (A, Z . ALL. u1dR+<- uJ PAawoA'Li T o 0-EAS A*, 4 a az L.), JfgT[ 5TACT TIm0 w!TH UTy ;NSPKT, Pcp-r, too mac, Ss2,��. These rhn, have ben V e „ a Public Works f , a^. F t "c z+ � CLEiu�O�)T 7C',90 irNV Zb,l9 (a —se lmT+✓<zLsPTIeu. ✓4U LT PG-it 3 5 p *55 -IZ. (size AoJ E-xAc-T Lo(- - TIoto TO OE DeSi(P.J&o r3{ o r4 (iEE M E krJ(cAt. r1,4 - 1,.)s, SKEET M 5 ) 13L IX, Ct,EAOOJT TJk w i ws, ou 2 es ` av4N. �Eu�le � - ?EVIS10.')) 7 , Dt_■E GOr)FLILT k 5XtSTItj6- jz'' P6r2 LUJ 34 STOg-N1 LJ J �1Gi�TOri, i z p c t( /IO 1 � - l I v i� r- { D91 -DI 3C 2' 15