Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2009-05-11 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET5. REPORTS Monday, May 11, 2009, 7:00 PM Tukwila City Hall; Council Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE to be led by Seahurst Child Care Group from the YMCA. 2. SPECIAL Update on the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) 2040 Plan; PRESENTATIONS Ben Bakkenta, Principal Planner. 3. CITIZEN At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included on this agenda COMMENT (please limit your comments to five minutes per citizen). To comment on an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is presented for discussion. 4. SPECIAL a. Minor Home Repair Program. Pg.1 ISSUES b. Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Pg.15 c. Contract Amendment with Commercial Development Solutions. Pg.91 d. King County Animal Control options. Pg.97 6. MISCELLANEOUS 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION 8. ADJOURNMENT w Tukwila City Council Agenda f�z COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE J im Haggerton, Mayor Councilmembers: Joe Duffie Pamela Linder k2 Rhonda Berry, City Administrator Dennis Robertson Verna Griffin Joan Hernandez, Council President Kathy Hougardy De'Sean Quinn a. Mayor b. City Council c. Staff d. City Attorney e. Intergovernmental Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible. Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice to the City Clerk's Office 206 433- 1800/TDD 206 248 -2933. This notice is available at www.ci.tukwila.wa.us, and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities. Tukwila Council meetings are audio taped. CAS Nu mm C ;On Dh.cussion Si' c )NSOR'S 'L'i; \I \RY RI l l \'I J BY illtg Date 05/11/09 illtg Date 05/18/09 tbltg Date I I MTG. DATE 05/11/09 0 05£ 1 COW Mtg. Utilities Cmte COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Meeting Date Prepared by 1 Maya' review 1 Council review 05/11/09 EBty6 1L 05/18/09 EB 1 J CA &P Cmte Arts Comm. ITEM INFORMATION Initials ORIGINAL AGI.ND,\ D,\TI;: MAY 11, 2009 A(I :ND.\ h ?\I Trrl,i. 2010 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) application for Minor Home Repair Program Motion 1 'Resolution I I Ordinance I Bic/Award Altg Date tldtg Date SPONSOR Council Nyor I 4dm Svcs I I DCD 1 Finance I 1 Fire I I Legal n PAR Police U PlV F &S Cmte Parks Comm. Altg Date RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION Public Hearing n Other ITEM NO. 4. tlltg Date Council approval is being requested to authorize the Mayor to sign the 2010 application for Community Development Block Grant funds to be used for Minor Home repair for the cities of Tukwila, SeaTac, Des Moines and Covington. Transportation Cmte Planning Comm. Dr \TE: 04/27/09 RECOMMENDATIONS: S P()NS()R /ADI\IIN. Mayor's Office COMMJI'TEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EIPI .INDyI'URI% RI±QUIRVD AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $91,000* Fund Source: HUMAN SERVICES GENERAL FUND Comments: *Funds are paid upfront by the city and reimbursed by King County MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 05/11/09 Informational Memorandum dated 04/20/09 CDBG application Minutes from the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting of 04/27/09 INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Community and Parks FROM: Evelyn Boykan, Human Services Manager DATE: April 20, 2009 SUBJECT: Authorization to submit Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Application for 2010 Minor Home Repair Program ISSUE The Council is being asked to authorize the Mayor to sign an application for Community Development Block Grant funds for the Minor Home Repair Program. For 2010, we propose serving as the fiscal administrator for minor home repair in the cities of Tukwila, SeaTac, Des Moines, and Covington. This program successfully assists low and moderate income homeowners in maintaining their homes. BACKGROUND The Office of Human Services has been administering this program in -house since 2005. In 2008 our contractors completed 23 repair jobs with over 200 hours of labor. RECOMMENDATION We seek Council support for this application and consideration at the May 11, 2009 Committee of the Whole Meeting and subsequent May 18, 2009 Regular Meeting. ATTACHMENTS City of Tukwila Grant Application to King County. W:12009 InfoMemos\InfoMemoCDBG2010.doc Jim Haggerton, Mayor PART I GENERAL INFORMATION Title Page 2010 CDBG Capital Application No. 1. Applicant Agency Name City of Tukwila 2. Title of Proposed Project Tukwila /SeaTac /Des Moines /Covington Minor Home Repair 3. Project Site Street Address Sites are the individual homeowners within the cities of Tukwila, SeaTac, Des Moines and Covington Zip Code (Required) 3.1 Provide boundaries of service delivery area in narrative form (describing natural boundaries, site street names, roads, etc).and provide a map outlining the area that will be served. Projects will take place in the natural city boundaries. 4. Proposed Use of CDBG Funds (Briefly summarize in one or two sentences how CDBG funds will be used.) Funds will be used to fully subsidize the cost of repairs and housing maintenance for income eligible homeowners within the cities of Tukwila, SeaTac, Des Moines and Covington. Funds address low /moderate income housing preservation and maintenance. 5. 2010 CDBG Funds Requested: In -Kind Match: Other Fund Sources Total Project Cost: 91,000 undetermined hours of staff time in each city 91,000 6. Can your project be funded at a reduced level if necessary? x_ yes no. If yes, what is the minimum amount of CDBG funding will be needed to still have the project go forward? 82,000 What will be changed to address the reduction of funds? On a first come, first serve basis, residents will be assisted until funds are depleted. We may choose to only prioritize emergency repairs. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THE INFORMATION INCLUDED IN THIS APPLICATION HAS BEEN CAREFULLY EXAMINED. APPLICANT UNDERSTANDS AND AGREES TO COMPLY WITH THE POLICIES, RULES AND REGULATIONS REFERENCED IN THE APPLICATION IF FUNDING IS AWARDED. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD THAT INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THIS APPLICATION WILL BECOME A PART OF ANY SUBSEQUENT FUNDING CONTRACT. Applicant Contact Information: X Authorized Signature of Applicant Print or Type Contact Name and Title Print or type Name and Title E -mail Address Phone and Fax Assigned Project No: C10 HUD Matrix Code: Eligibility Citation: 570. Consolidated Plan Strategy Assigned Application No: Amount of Funding Request: National Objective Citation: 208. North /East Sub Region So. Sub Region Regional PART I General Information and Part II Federal Requirements Agency Information Page 1 of 9 PART II Federal Requirements A. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 2010 CDBG Application If your project activity involves planning, human services, engineering /design fees or permitting costs and intended actions would not make any alterations to the physical environment, or to any buildings or other structures now, or in the future, it may be an exempt activity. You may state that as a response to these questions. If you are unsure, please contact Randy Poplock at the contact information provided below. A.1 Identify the nearest natural waterbody (stream, lake, etc.). How far is it from the project site? NA A.2 What are the current site conditions, including ground surface (grass, asphalt, etc.) and natural features (trees, etc.)? NA A.3 Describe the area surrounding the project site, i.e. commercial, residential, heavily wooded, etc. NA A.4 What is the current use of the site? NA A.5 How developed is the site and its adjacent properties? Please explain. NA A.6 Does a current stormwater system exist at the project site? NA A.7 Is the project located in a(n): A.7.1 FEMA- designated floodplain? (CDBG funds may not be used for any projects located in an area defined by FEMA to be a floodway [area of highest water velocity]). Consult with Randy Poplock if you feel this may be a factor regarding the location of your project. A.7.2 Wetland? A.7.3 Ecologically- sensitive area? A.7.4 Designated Historic neighborhood? A.8 How much impervious surface (example: concrete, etc.) will be added (if applicable)? NA A.9 Will the project excavate or otherwise disturb soil? If so, to what depth and horizontal dimensions? Will any previously- undisturbed soil be impacted? Please explain. NA A.10 Do any underground storage tanks (used to store oil /fuel) exist on, or adjacent to, the property? Did any exist in the past? If yes, please explain, include size of the tank(s). NA A.11 Identify any environmental records or studies completed related to this site. Types of Studies: Title Date Completed: Phase I Title Date Completed: Other: Title Date Completed: A.12 Provide and label pictures of project site as follows: A.12.1 North A.12.2 East A.12.3 South and A.12.4 West. A.13 Attach a site plan. *Choice- Limiting Activities: From your application submittal date until the ER completion date, no "choice limiting" activities (such as property acquisition, clearing, grading, site prep, etc.) may occur. Undertaking such activities after application submittal could void the proiect's eli>?ibility. If you need assistance with the Environmental Review Details section, please contact Randy Poplock at (206) 263 -9099 or Randv.Poolock a(�kingcountv.gov. Page 2 of 9 PART I General Information and Part II Federal Requirements Agency Information PART II Federal Requirements B. RELOCATION DETAILS 2010 CDBG Application B.1 Will this project involve: Residential tenant relocation? Commercial tenant relocation? move 0/7 to the next section of the application. If your answer is No for B.1 B.2 Type of Relocation Residential: Commercial: I I II B.11 Attach Tenant Relocation Plan Permanent B.6 Have you provided notices to the tenants indicating the type of displacement and benefits provided to tenants? B.7 Have you identified replacement or temporary units for those who will be displaced? B.8 Have you determined the tenants' relocation benefits? B.9 Have you included the total relocation budget in the development budget under relocation? C 2010 CDBG Capital Application No. Temporary Permanent Temporary n Yes xn No Yes ❑x No Briefly describe anticipated relocation needs and how they will be addressed B.3 What requirements or guidelines govern your relocation plan? (check all applicable) n Uniform Relocation Act Section104 [d] Washington State Department of Transportation Other (please specify): B.4 Have you developed a relocation plan for this project? Yes 1 1 No B.5 How many tenants will need to be relocated in this project? Residential Commercial II LI Yes No Yes n No Yes 1 I No n Yes I I No Attachments (use colored separator sheets between documents) B.10 Attach copies of notices required indicating the type of displacement and benefits provided to the tenants If you feel your project activity is a planning or human service activity and does not trigger the Uniform Relocation Act, please indicate such. If you are unsure, please contact Wendy DeRobbio for technical assistance at the following contact information and for documentation concurring with your interpretation. If you need assistance with the Relocation Details section, please contact Wendy DeRobbio, Relocation Specialist, 206 263 -9070; or wendy.derobbio @kingcounty.gov. PART I General Information and Part II Federal Requirements Agency Information Page 3 of 9 C AGENCY INFORMATION 2010 CDBG Capital Application No. C.1 APPLICANT AGENCY CONTACT SHEET AND ORGANIZATION INFORMATION AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION: General (Offices) Executive Director Financial Staff Fiscal Information C.2 AGENCY SERVICE INFORMATION Agency Name: City of Tukwila Mailing Address: 6200 Southcenter Blvd City /State /Zip: Tukwila, Wa 98188 Phone and Fax 206 433 7180- 433 -7181 Web Site Address: www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Name/Title: E -Mail: Phone and Fax Name/Title: E -Mail: Phone and Fax Rhonda Berry rberry@ci.tukwila.wa. us 206 433 -1851 433 -7191 Shawn Hunstock shunstock @ci.tukwila.wa. us 433 -1838, 433 -1833 Applicant's Federal Taxpayer ID No. 91- 6001519 Applicant's Federal DUNS Number: King County Vendor contract(s) with King County) (Only Applicable if you currently have a C.2.1 What services does your agency provide? Describe the need or problem your program is designed to meet. What is the problem /need you are addressing? Quantify this need, using local or regional data that confirm or describe the problem or need. How much of the need are you currently serving? The City of Tukwila provides municipal services to a residential population of about 17,000. The Human Services division supports programs that assist residents in meeting basic needs. Housing issues are our number one request for assistance. Throughout all 4 cities identified in this application, poorly maintained single family home ownership is a concern identified through multiple departments within the cities. Tukwila's housing units for our lowest income populations are in need of maintenance and repair work in order to both preserve the housing and assist the homeowners in being able to live safely and independently. We expect that we are serving about 10% of the need. Most of our clients are in the 30% of median income bracket and are either senior citizens or adults with disabilities. The Des Moines Minor Home Repair program serves a diverse population, and over 14.8% of the residents are older than 65. They partner with their Senior Center to identify specific housing repair needs. 33.3% of the population is substantially under median household income and 7.6% live well below the poverty level. Many of their clients are senior citizens and disabled adults, who require minor home repairs to sustain independent living. According to the 2000 Census, 6.8% of SeaTac residents are 65 or older. The per capita income for the city is $19,717. 11.5% of the population and 9.8% of families are below the poverty line. Out of the total population, 15.5% of those under the age of 18 and 8.1% of those 65 and older are living below the poverty line. 90% of SeaTac homes were built between 1956 and 1980 meaning homes range in age between 25 and 50 years old. As people age, so do many of their homes and the need for even minor home repairs can become a threat to the homeowner's health and safety. But often, due to financial limitations, these home repairs cannot be addressed and as a result, an older adult's safety may be compromised. A fall, injury or even just the threat of PART I General Information and Part II Federal Requirements Agency Information Page 4 of 9 such an incident can affect an older person's ability to remain in his /her home. 95% of the SeaTac minor hope repair applicants have been seniors and /or disabled, living well below the poverty line and with minimal repairs have been able to remain living independently. The City of Covington has a population of 17,900 with 5,259 housing units. With only one apartment complex in the city, there is a high percentage of owner occupied homes. Current demographics indicate that 32% of the households show an income below the HUD moderate income level and 4.4% are over the age of 65. The housing units for our lowest income population were built 40 -45 years ago resulting in many homes in need o minor repair work to maintain the value of the community and increase the quality of life to homeowners. However, due to financial limitations, home repairs are being neglected which leads to further deterioration and safety issues. C.2.2 How do you determine eligibility (income screening, location of residence, eligibility in other government programs? Are you familiar with current CDBG income screening requirements? Cities are familiar with income screening requirements and each homeowner is required to submit substantiating income data. Tukwila has managed a minor home repair program since 2005, so we are well familiar with income screening requirements. C.3.2 Describe the process your agency uses to a) assess community needs, b) obtain input from clients on service delivery and c) ensure the services are delivered by culturally competent staff in a culturally competent manner. How often is this completed? Assessing community needs occurs on an on -going basis, through communicating with residents, non- profits, collecting relevant data through a multitude of sources including school district, DSHS, county, United Way and other data. Client follow -up and satisfaction surveys give us feedback on service delivery related to this program. We also work with specialized agencies to ensure that we have support in addressing some needs of our culturally and language diverse population. C.3 AGENCY PROGRAM EXPERIENCE C.3.1 Describe the length of time the agency has operated, date of incorporation, the purpose of the agency, and the type of corporation. Describe the type of services provided, the agency's capabilities, the number and characteristics of clients served, and required licenses to operate (if applicable). The City of Tukwila, incorporated in 1908 servies the residential and business population with standard municipal services. C.3.2 Briefly describe the agency's existing staff positions and qualifications, its capacity to carry out this activity, and state whether the agency has a personnel policy manual with an affirmative action plan and grievance procedure. Evelyn Boykan, Human Services Manager has managed CDBG funds since 1991 and a minor home repair program since 1999. in 2005, the program was taken in house. She has served in her position for 18 years. The City maintains a personnel policy manual and is an equal opportunity employer and assures equal employment regardless of race, creed, color, ethnicity, etc. The City also maintains a grievance policy and procedures. C.4 BACKGROUND INFORMATION If you are a government or municipal agency, C.4.1 and C.4.2 need not be answered. C.4.1 Provide current list of Agency Board of Directors: Include name, position /title, city residence, length of time on the Board, and expiration of terms. Note any vacant positions. Insert text here C.4.2 Provide Agency's current adopted Mission Statement: Insert text here C.4.3 Required Attachments (required only with hard copy submittal): PART I General Information and Part II Federal Requirements Agency Information Page 5 of 9 C.4.3.i Current Bylaws; Articles of Incorporation (Non- Profit only) C.4.3.ii Copy of Non Profit IRS Letter of Designation (Non- Profit only) C.4.3.iii Organization Chart (Non- Profit only) C.4.3.iv A copy of most recent Audit (Required of all Applicants) C.4.3.v If Community Based Development Organization (CBDO), updated information demonstrating current CBDO eligibility status. C.5 PROJECT PARTNER SPONSOR INFORMATION: (King County Housing Authority and King County Department Sponsored Projects) C.5.1 GeneralAgency Name: Mailing Address: City /State /Zip: Phone and Fax Web Site Address: C.5.2 Executive Director Name/Title: E -Mail: Phone and Fax C.5.3 If King County: (Division Director) Name/Title: Department: E -Mail: Phone and Fax Assigned Staff Contact Name: E -Mail: Phone and Fax ATTENTION: Applications submitted by cities or towns must be sianed, not stamped, by your Mayor or City Manager and authorized by your City Council. Applications submitted by nonprofit organizations or special districts must be sianed by an authorized representative and authorized by your board. A copy of City Council or board minutes authorizing submittal of your application must be submitted with the application. If more than one application is submitted, the City Council or board minutes authorizing the applications must indicate priority order of proposal request. PART I General Information and Part II Federal Requirements Agency Information Page 6 of 9 C.6 CULTURAL COMPENTENCY ADVISORY SECTION ON CULTURAL COMPETENCY IN PROVISION OF SERVICES Purpose: Please note that this section is strictly advisory to the applicant. The purpose of this page is to call attention to a trend still in development, but that is receiving considerable discussion nationwide and for which standards will likely be developed in the future. This the trend to achieve cultural competency in the delivery of social services to populations of diverse ethnic, racial, religious, linguistic and other backgrounds. Most local agencies are already serving the needs of these diverse populations with great success. The concept of cultural competency seeks to extend these efforts to even better serve the diversity of people in our communities. Definition of Cultural Competency: An ongoing and evolving process that comprises knowledge attainment and the development of behaviors, attitudes, policies, and practices that come together in a system of care enabling agencies, programs, and individuals to increase access to services and to develop or adapt services that are appropriate to specific cultural needs. Cultural competency implies a process, rather than a single point in time. Further, it requires the attainment of knowledge and skills that will help providers and programs work more effectively with people who have diverse backgrounds and experiences. Finally, cultural competence requires action to increase access and cultural adaptation based on what is learned about individuals and communities. Cultural competency denotes a commitment to social change, accessibility to opportunity, and delivery of services that are relevant to the details of a household's particular cultural background. Please respond to the following questions: (Please answer all three questions one single page.) C.6.1 To the best of your ability please describe the diversity of people your agency currently serves in terms of the following categories: race, ethnicity, religious affiliations, language groups, sexual orientation, and disability (physical and psychiatric), Our diverse community is represented by over 65 languages and a wide range of faiths. Our school district is the most diverse in the nation. Greater than 26% of the population speaks a language other than English. 59% of residents are Caucasisan, 13% African American, 11% Asian /Pacific islander and 14% Hispanic. Thirty percent of our population receives some medical assistance benefits through DSHS. Over 32% receive some economic services through DSHS. From July 2005 -2006, 135 resdients were identified as receiving state developmental disability services. C.6.2 How are your agency's services constructed to meet the needs of its clients based upon their identity as a member of one or more of these groups? (Examples: give #'s of bilingual staff, access to interpreter services, or collaborations with specialized expertise from agencies that serve minority populations.) City departments seek to meet the needs of specialized client populations through advance notice of the need for interpreters or modifications for those with disabilities. Additionally, interpretation is provided for situations where it is mandated; police and court functions. We maintain an internal list of staff people within the city who are available for short, non mandated, activities. Departments also continue to take steps to translating documents. We work with bilingual /bicultural school district staff on issues related to client needs. Our contracted services also assist us in serving specialized populations; i.e. Refugee Women's Alliance, Somali Community Coalition Services. The City makes the workplace accessible for staff that need special consideration due to disabilities. City benefits include domestic partner coverage for city employees. The City continues to support an Equity and Diversity Commission to help understand the diversity in the community and celebrate the richness of our differences. C.6.3 Do you have a training strategy in place to achieve cultural competency? Please describe. PART I General Information and Part II Federal Requirements Agency Information Page 7 of 9 We continue to participate in and promote training for our staff and contracted providers. We also provide opportunities for our board and other city members, regarding sensitization to cultural competence. The Equity and Diversity Commission sponsors programs, education and training around equity and fairness. Resources: The following resources are available to increase your agency's ability to serve people of diverse backgrounds in a culturally competent manner: Training opportunities are available through: minority Executive Directors Coalition (206) 325- 2542, or University of Washington School of Social Work. On the web: www.air.org /cecp /cultural. PART I General Information and Part II Federal Requirements /Agency Information Page 8 of 9 COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PARKS COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes April 27, 2009 5:00 p.m.; Conference Room #3 City of Tukwila Community Affairs and Parks Committee PRESENT Councilmembers: Verna Griffin, Chair; Joe Duffle and Kathy Hougady Staff: Evie Boykan, Jack Pace, Rebecca Fox, Derek Speck, Rhonda Berry and Kimberly Matej Guests: Beth Dwyer, GGLO Architecture CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Griffin called the meeting to order at 5:02 p.m. I. PRESENTATIONS No presentations. H. BUSINESS AGENDA A. Minor Home Renair Program for 2010 Staff is seeking Council authorization to submit the 2010 Community Development Block Grant application to King County requesting $91,000 for the Minor Home Repair Program. The City's application proposes to continue the Human Services Minor Home Repair Program for Tukwila as well as the fiscal management of similar programs for the cities of SeaTac, Des Moines and Covington. This is the first year that Covington has requested participation in the program. As with past applications, incorporation of multiple cities into one application makes our request more competitive against other projects. The funding for this program is not a guarantee. Evie answered some questions relative to program specifics and those who are served through the program. The program only serves single family homeowners up to moderate income standards, but the majority of the clients are at 30% of median income. The program has an annual limit of $2,000 and lifetime cap of $5,000. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MAY 11 COW FOR DISCUSSION. B. 2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Staff is seeking full Council determination of whether or not to forward the proposed 2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendments to the Planning Commission for further consideration, review and public hearing. Staff summarized and provided a brief overview of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments annual review process. Two applications have been submitted for the City's consideration as described below (one from the City and one from the public): An application seeking to create an overlay district for commercial, commercial redevelopment and multifamily zoned properties within the urban renewal area. The proposed renewal overlay district lies between the following areas: South 140 Street, 37 Avenue South, South 146 Street and 42r Avenue South. Staff mentioned that this areas known as Tukwila Village has been identified as the second highest priority in the City. An application to redesignate a portion of land from medium density residential (MDR) to high density residential (HDR) at 3421 South 144 UNANIMOUS APPROVAL FOR BOTH APPLICATIONS. FORWARD TO MAY 11 COW FOR DISCUSSION. CAS NUMBER: SPONSOR'S SUMMARY Fund Source: Comments: 1 MTG. DATE 1 05/11/09 MTG. DATE 05/11/09 cl D 1 EXPENDITURE REQUIRED COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials Meeting Date I Prepare 1 Mayor's review Council review 05/11/09 R 1 i,.- ?,l'i 05/18/09 RF\ 1 M ITEM INFORMATION ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: MAY 11, 2009 ITEM No. AGENDA ITEM TITLE 2009 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment /Rezone applications and review process CATEGORY Discussion Motion U Resolution n Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other Mtg Date 5/11/09 Mtg Date 05/18/09 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal n P&R Police PW A briefing will be provided on two Comprehensive Plan amendments /Rezone requests for 2009. Comments will be taken in Public Meeting format at the May 18 Regular Meeting. After the public meeting, the City Council will be asked to take action on whether to forward the requests to the Planning Commission for analysis and recommendation. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. n Parks Comm. n Planning Comm. DATE: 4/27/09 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Department of Community Development COMMITTEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION ATTACHMENTS A. Informational Memorandum dated May 1, 2009 B. Minutes from Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting of 4/27/09 C. Chart-- Review Process D. Map Locations of Comprehensive Plan amendment requests E,F,G- Map Applications Osterly Pk.Townhome MDR to HDR (Files #L08 -077 &109- H,I,J- Map&Applications- -Urban Renewal Overlay District (Files #L08 -081 L08 -082 1 TO: ISSUE BACKGROUND City of Tukwila FROM: Jack Pace, Community Development Direct DATE: May 1, 2009 INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM Mayor Haggerton Tukwila City Council SUBJECT: ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS ATTACHMENT A After the public meeting and discussion, the City Council will make a threshold /screening decision on whether to forward the proposed amendments to the Planning Commission for further consideration at this point. It is not necessary to consider the specific merits or substance of the request to make this decision. The Washington State Growth Management Act limits the City of Tukwila to amending the Comprehensive Plan once a year, unless it is an emergency. Two applications for Comprehensive Plan amendment/Rezone that were received by the December 31, 2008 deadline are being considered for review during 2009. The Community Affairs and Parks Committee was briefed on the applications on April 27, 2009 (Attachment B). Jim Haggerton, Mayor On May 11, 2009 there will be a briefing on this year's requests for Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezones, and the review process. On May 18, 2009 a public meeting will be held to receive comments from the public on the potential amendments. Review Process: The procedure for City Council review is illustrated by Attachment C. The Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone review process has several steps, and takes several months with opportunity for public comment at each point. The process involves two separate reviews by the City Council, with intermediate review by the Planning Commission. The first step in Council's consideration is to take comments and evaluate the proposed amendment at a public meeting that will be held on May 18, 2009. After the public meeting, the Council will evaluate each proposed amendment according to the following review criteria: Is the issue already adequately addressed in the Comprehensive Plan? If the issue is not adequately addressed in the Comprehensive Plan, is there a public need for the proposed change? Is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? Will the proposed change result in a new benefit to the community? After evaluating the applications based on the review criteria, the Council shall make a threshold /screening decision consisting of one of the following actions: Refer the proposal to the Planning Commission for further review; Modify the proposal and refer it to the Planning Commission for further review; Defer consideration for one year to get additional information; or, Reject the proposal INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 The threshold /screening decision to be made is not whether to approve the request, but whether to forward it to the Planning Commission for analysis and a public hearing. The Planning Commission will analyze any application that is forwarded from the City Council, hold its own public hearing, and make a recommendation based on the substance of the request. Afterwards, the issue will return to the City Could for a briefing, public hearing, deliberation and final action. At that point, the Council may: Adopt a proposed amendment by ordinance; Adopt a modified version of a proposed amendment by ordinance; or Reject the amendment. Consideration of a site specific amendment is a quasi judicial decision. Consideration of a policy amendment is a legislative decision. DISCUSSION Applications- Attachment D shows the location of both requests. Osterly Park Townhomes Redesignate property from Medium Density Residential (MDR) to High Density Residential (HDR) (File #L08- 077 Comprehensive Plan File #L09 -002 Rezone) The applicant, Mike Overbeck, is requesting to redesignate one parcel from Medium Density Residential (MDR) to High Density Residential (HDR) at 3421 S. 144th. The .25 acre property had been the subject of a long -term code enforcement action, and is the site of a former meth house that was recently demolished. The site's current Medium Density Residential (MDR) allows up to 14.5 units per acre. High Density Residential (HDR) would allow up to 22 units per acre. The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment/Rezone area is part of a multi parcel proposal for a 31 unit townhome project which will be developed in phases. The rezone property would be part of phase 2 of Tukwila's first townhome project. (Attachments E, F, G) 1. Is the issue already adequately addressed in the Comprehensive Plan? The proposed Comprehensive Plan change /Rezone from MDR to HDR is not currently addressed in the Comprehensive Plan, although the need for a variety of housing stock and healthy neighborhoods is. It would allow new development to occur with an efficient site plan. 2.If the issue is not adequately addressed in the Comprehensive Plan, is there a need for the proposed change? The proposed Comprehensive Plan change would enable the property to become part of a townhome development proposal, whose first phase is now under staff review. 3. Is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? The proposed change from MDR to HDR will permit additional housing to be built as part of a townhome proposal, and will result in more housing construction and ownership options. C:ITempIXPGrpWiselcompPlan. doc INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 3 4. Will the proposed change result in a net benefit to the community? The proposed change will create the opportunity for an increased supply of new townhome housing, and allow development on a former nuisance property that was recently demolished. Urban Renewal Overlay District (File #L08- 081 Comprehensive Plan Amendment File# L08- 082 Zoning Code Amendment). The applicant Derek Speck/City of Tukwila seeks to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code to create a new "Urban Renewal Overlay District" for commercial, commercial redevelopment and multifamily zoned properties within the existing Urban Renewal Area. The Urban Renewal Area was originally designated in the January, 2000 "Tukwila International Boulevard Plan." The proposed Urban Renewal Overlay District is comprised of approximately seven blocks, and generally lies between S. 140 Street, 37 Avenue South, S. 146 Street and 42n Avenue S. It includes the Tukwila Village site, and has long been the focus of community planning efforts and public improvements. (Attachments H, I, J) The intent of the Urban Renewal Overlay District is to encourage a compact, transit oriented development pattern with neighborhood- oriented services, redevelopment of distressed property, and more lively and pedestrian friendly site design. Existing zoning would remain in place by the proposed overlay district would provide alternative development standards that could be applied to developments upon the property owner's request, and if certain qualifying criteria were met. A policy would be added to the Comprehensive Plan. Alternative development standards would be added to the Zoning Code, and the Zoning Map would be amended. As now proposed, alternative development standards in the proposed Urban Renewal Overlay District would allow: 1. Increased building heights up to 65 feet in certain areas; 2. Reduced multi family parking standards, including one parking space per dwelling unit for units that contain up to one bedroom plus 0.5 spaces for each additional bedroom; 3. Maximum number of dwelling units to be determined by the building envelope, rather than setting a specific limit on the number of residential dwelling units; and, 4. Live /work space on the ground floor in Neighborhood Commercial Center to meet the requirement for ground floor retail or office. In order to use the alternative standards, developers would need to meet criteria designed to create an attractive, pedestrian and transit friendly neighborhood, such as: 1. Provide significant covered parking; 2. Provide active uses on the ground floor, except garage entrances; 3. Provide leases that prohibit on- street residential parking; 4. Protect adjacent residential uses with building setbacks; 5. Provide pedestrian amenities, and other requirements designed to create a healthy, attractive neighborhood. C:ITempIXPGrp WiselcompPlan.doc INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 4 Review Criteria: 1.1s the issue already adequately addressed in the Comprehensive Plan? Redevelopment along Tukwila International Boulevard is addressed in the current Comprehensive Plan and associated documents: Plan Objective #2 "To redevelop and reinvigorate the Pacific Highway Corridor" Goal 8.2 "A Pacific Highway that is an attractive, safe and profitable place to live, do business, shop and work, and is a positive reflection of the City as a whole and of the surrounding residential and business community" Policies 8.2.1 through 8.2.21— Address intentions for Tukwila International Boulevard improvements "Tukwila International Boulevard Plan (1 /00)— Revitalization and Urban Renewal Designates the Urban Renewal Area "Tukwila International Boulevard Design Manual (2/99)" —Sets design guidelines for new development and redevelopment 2.If the issue is not adequately addressed in the Comprehensive Plan, is there a need for the proposed change? The proposed amendment is needed to supplement policies and development standards that relate to Tukwila International Boulevard. It provides specific and targeted guidance to encourage redevelopment of underutilized properties that are included in the designated Urban Renewal Area, and allows the maximum opportunity for private enterprise, such as Tukwila Village, that is consistent with City of Tukwila goals and public needs. This will enhance the overall desirability of the area with high quality, compact, pedestrian and transit oriented development. 3.1s the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? The proposed overlay zone will encourage desired development in the area that has been identified as being the highest priority for acquisition, redevelopment and rehabilitation. 4, Will the proposed change result in a net benefit to the community? The proposed Urban Renewal Overlay District will benefit the community by making new, compact design more economically feasible and by requiring pedestrian and other amenities that will make a more attractive and interesting neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION After holding a public meeting and discussion on May 18, 2009, the Council is being asked to decide by motion from among the following: Refer the proposal as is to the Planning Commission for further review; Modify the proposal and refer to the Planning Commission for further review; Defer consideration until a later time to get more information; Reject the proposal. It is not necessary to consider the specific merits or substance of the request to make this decision. C:\Temp1XPGrpWiselcompPlan.doc INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 5 ATTACHMENTS A. (Information Memo) B. Minutes, Community Affairs and Parks Committee (4/27/09) C. Chart Comprehensive Plan amendment process D. Map —Comp Plan amendment locations E. Map Osterly Park Townhome MDR to HDR F. Application Osterly Park Townhome MDR to HDR— Comprehensive Plan Amendment (File #L08 -077) G. Application Osterly Park Townhome MDR to HDR— Rezone (File #L09 -002) H. Map —Urban Renewal Overlay District location I. Application —Urban Renewal Overlay— Comprehensive Plan Amendment (File #L08 -081) J. Application —Urban Renewal Overlay— Rezone (File #L08 -082) C:ITemp\XPGrpWiselcompPlan.doc COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PARKS COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes April 27, 2009 5:00 p.m.,. Conference Room #3 I. PRESENTATIONS No presentations. City of Tukwila Community Affairs and Parks Committee PRESENT Councilmembers: Verna Griffin, Chair; Joe Duffle and Kathy Hougady Staff: Evie Boykan, Jack Pace, Rebecca Fox, Derek Speck, Rhonda Berry and Kimberly Matej Guests: Beth Dwyer, GGLO Architecture CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Griffin called the meeting to order at 5:02 p.m. II. BUSINESS AGENDA A. Minor Home Repair Program for 2010 Staff is seeking Council authorization to submit the 2010 Community Development Block Grant application to King County requesting $91,000 for the Minor Home Repair Program. The City's application proposes to continue the Human Services Minor Home Repair Program for Tukwila as well as the fiscal management of similar programs for the cities of SeaTac, Des Moines and Covington. This is the first year that Covington has requested participation in the program. As with past applications, incorporation of multiple cities into one application makes our request more competitive against other projects. The funding for this program is not a guarantee. Evie answered some questions relative to program specifics and those who are served through the program. The program only serves single family homeowners up to moderate income standards, but the majority of the clients are at 30% of median income. The program has an annual limit of $2,000 and lifetime cap of $5,000. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MAY 11 COW FOR DISCUSSION. B. 2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Staff is seeking full Council determination of whether or not to forward the proposed 2009 Comprehensive Plan Amendments to the Planning Commission for further consideration, review and public hearing. Staff summarized and provided a brief overview of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments annual review process. Two applications have been submitted for the City's consideration as described below (one from the City and one from the public): An application seeking to create an overlay district for commercial, commercial redevelopment and multifamily zoned properties within the urban renewal area. The proposed renewal overlay district lies between the following areas: South 140 Street, 37 Avenue South, South 146 Street and 42' Avenue South. Staff mentioned that this areas known as Tukwila Village has been identified as the second highest priority in the City. An application to redesignate a portion of land from medium density residential (MDR) to high density residential (HDR) at 3421 South 144` UNANIMOUS APPROVAL FOR BOTH APPLICATIONS. FORWARD TO MAY 11 COW FOR DISCUSSION. Options for Council Review Threshold Review Actions 1 Refer to Planning Commission COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS Environmental Review /SEPA Planning Commission Hearing /Recommendation City Council Public Hearing City Council Decision /Action Attachment C i Defer Proposal IIIEi337Efl1► Legend Tukwila Village Project Area Zoning Lines x Tukwila City Limits Proposed Urban Renewal Overlay District Commercial Redevelopment Areas Proposed Commercial Redevelopment Areas f ever Townhome Project Area Proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) to !y High Density Residential (HDR) Proposed Renewal O v Osterly Park Townhome MDR to HDR (L08 -077 L09 -002) Urban Renewal Overlay District (L08-081 L08 -082) Attachment OSTERLY PARK TOWNHOMES MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (MDR) TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (HDR) File L08 -077 Comprehensive Plan Amendment File #L09 -002 Rezone Zoning Lines MEIM;g1 Townhome Project Area L09-002 Rezone-Medium Density Residential (MDR) to High Density Residential (HDR) MCC L08-077 Comprehensive Plan Amendment-Medium Density Residential (MDR) to High Density Residential (HDR) I Proposed Medium Density Residential (MDR) to High Density Residential (HDR) Oster ly Park Townhomes Attachment E e. Planner: c Application Complete Application Incomplete CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us APPLICATION FOR ST4FF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P -CPA 1 I File Number: y2 '7' 4 (Date: cap (Date: i NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: OS( C'e i LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. T3 7: Pf Wit" 77 4, f c' /6 J 2O /L /L 2 `i Li 26' 3 Y /II nY( 7 /V% 474 7g/CE LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). U O c t odv 7 3. 06 (6)c)t e3 Cy) vo/IC)L'C) 00 61 6 0 yo 07, 6 7/0 0000 6 3 /11 O CC7() DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR The individual who: has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: /l1 y V u cr B ec- Address: 5--f- A E6 i G (VA Phone: 9 C 3 Ct 2 FAX: 2 -6 6 (3 E -mail: N/? j (V /4l'� %11 e' (2.6:;41 I f Signature: Bate: /Gj ci ATTACHMENT F ,c ,ED CONIMUNiTT OFVFLOPMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS Project File Number: Other File Numbers: 0341 OO' `L j,., A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: M R' Proposed: H OR B. ZONING DESIGNATION: Existing: PI 0 R Proposed: t C. LAND USE(S): Existing: S.PZ --P477'3 r� Proposed: rlo f-/- 1 7 (for proposed changes in land use designations or rezones) D. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING LAND USES: Describe the existing uses located within 1,000 feet in all directions from the property or area for which a change is proposed. LL J 1 A1/24 r -7, 01 4 /i /y lie A044 f /Li /41-44,74/ .ko Pe 5 7L-- STATE OF WASHINGTON CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tula; t∎ u, AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly swoin and upon oath states as follows: I. 1 am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the hest of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, a ents _engineers, contractors r other representatives the ri ht to enter upon Owner's real property, located at 3Y 2 /7 Q 5 (/i AA i 1h/�.. 4 7 �0 r� for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at gd eri°_ eU (city), lA 4- (state), on G 'ev- (0 r� Print Name 14 I Ir C L° L Address 1 -2062. 6 20 S. /g fi 2'/ /.,�il No 9g/ e Phone Number 71 7 i <o 5 Signature On this day personally appeared before me Al) Z. cY )C f5 E- C to me known to he the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS 16 tex DAY OF CD"') c(L 20 t').j NO1 resi My P Planning Forms Applications \2007 Applications\ BARApp -12 -07 doe, 12/07/07 1 RY PUBLagglrntf Washingt MONRHEA R LONG g�Y Appofntmeht �+p4 21 2W 1 0 1n sl Pl "S ,20 Yl STATE OF WASHINGTON EXECUTED at sJ R 4e✓" CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, FVA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E- mail.: tuknlanru ci tukwila.\la.uS AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its em loyees, agents, e gineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at 1 y ea 3 y A. S. To g for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. (city), Ejli (state), on P G 4' 6e r- 'M Print Name 4 IK_- ()V el e Qc_/ Address 1 16 2 0 f o' 7 5 Phone Number 2 0 (0 2 q 3. 635'1, 5'1, Signature �j /�G NOTARY residing My Co P. \Planning Forms \Apphca ttons \2007 Applications \DARAp0 -12 -07 doe, 12/07/07 On this day personally appeared before me Mt krz co to me known to he the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. per_ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS 1 DAY OF Y� r n `-Q- 20 y /v 20 a Notary Public Stot t ,b1,lq$o t iAJ MONTREA R 1ONG i ttytFte0MrAnt Explreatab•1- 2,12Q11 7r/1 birth 0/64 i /G R Comprehensive Plan Amendment Criteria Comprehensive Plan Amendment Criteria (TMC 18.80.050) The Application shall specify, in format established by the department: 1. Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comprehensive plan. If the issue is not adequately addressed, is there a need for the proposed change? The Proposal to redesignate and rezone the property to HDR is not currently addressed in the comprehensive plan. The existing Comprehensive plan designation for the property is MDR. I am seeking a Comprehensive Plan amendment to change the Land Use designation to HDR concurrent with an application to rezone the Property to HDR. The proposal is supported by many factors' that meet the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan as the Neighborhood has grown. Many examples of this are given in the concurrent submitted applications and their discussions. There is a public need for the proposed change. The concurrently submitted Townhouse proposal will occupy 6 tax parcels of which one is the subject property in this report. The subject lot has had a condemned single family residence that has been unoccupied for eight years and sits on a thoroughfare that is being revitalized. Currently the house is being used by transients and is creating a public hazard and urgently needs to be removed. The adjoining property has sat vacant for several years, the property in the rear of the proposed development also has a house and a mobile home, both are beyond repair and need to be removed. Due to some of Tukwila's narrow lots and the requirements set forth by public works, developing all of these lots with a common road has emerged as the best option. In the current comprehensive plan, the six lots are zoned for 33 units however, this project is only 31 units. The focus of this request is to meet the objective in the Townhouse Design Manual that spells out how a recreation area should be located in the center of the development. In this case, the only way to meet that design criteria and make this project financially feasible for the four land owners in the project is to change the Comprehensive plan and the zoning classification of the subject property. 2. Why is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? What other options are there for meeting the identified Public need? Redevelopment of the property is best suited by allowing it to become part of the submitted Townhome development as mentioned because of the size and shape of the lot. Also, there are issues with surface water drainage that can be compensated for by consolidating. The public has a need to get this property in line with the revitalization of the neighborhood to help support the comprehensive plan of the city. In order to achieve this, redevelopment of the land will be necessary. There have been no other options proposed for allowing this property to be a contributing part of the neighborhood in the past 8 years. 3. Why will the proposed change result in a net benefit to the community? The proposed change will result in a net benefit to the community by playing a key roll in allowing the Townhouse Development to be built. Some of the benefits include: Cleaning up an area that is in great need of revitalization, removing an existing Public Hazard and attraction for crime or transients, drastic aesthetic improvements to the thoroughfare, and the pride of 31 new homeowners that can contribute to the growth of the community in an area that is concentrated with renters. Comprehensive Plan amendment Criteria (TMC 18.80.0101 1. A detailed statement of what is proposed and why: The proposal is to change the Comprehensive Plan on the subject property to HDR, allowing for a zero lot line townhouse to be built on a 2000 sq ft lot instead of a 3000 sq ft lot as the previous MDR zoning allows for. As mentioned in this report it is necessary in order to make this subdivision a possibility and is the best option proposed at this time. 2. A statement of the anticipated impacts of the change, including the geographic area affected and the issues presented by the proposed change: Economic impact- this property has been a weight on the Property values in the neighborhood for the past 8 years. Not only are the existing property owners going to benefit from the new Townhouse units as they add a new standard of living in the area but the addition of 31 new home owners with their families will contribute to the retail growth in the area as well. This project in conjunction with other projects in the immediate area, such as the Tukwila Village, create an added bonus for small business growth. Transportation Impact- Please refer to the Transportation Concurrency notice for the specifics of impacts on the area. This property is served by Metro and is located ten blocks from the Light rail station on TIB. Aesthetic Impact- the development of this property will meet and or exceed the zoning requirements for landscaping and building setbacks. In addition, the professionally designed landscape plan, by Studio 342, state licensed landscape architect, will add to the appearance of the Project that will include a completely different look along the 144 Ave. street front. This is a positive for the community. Public Safety This property, for the past 8 years, has been a condemned property and has been a safety and health problem for the community. We are taking the best option proposed in order to develop and revitalize this lot as well as the lots next to it. There is a need to change the current condition of this lot. Comprehensive plan- this proposal will be in compliance with the comprehensive plan of the city if it is accepted. 3. An explanation of why the current comprehensive plan or development regulations are deficient or should not continue in effect. The current designation and zoning was placed on the property under different circumstances during a different time and usage of the land. The area has been primarily developed with multifamily dwellings that were built to provide housing for Boeing employees during the early 60's and 70's. The surrounding 5 lots in the concurrently submitted townhouse project already have the zoning HDR. As for reasons already discussed in this report combining these 6 lots is the best option proposed. The previous owner of the adjacent lot was unable, after two years of design attempts with his architect, to construct an eight -unit apartment building site plan that was acceptable to the City of Tukwila planners (ref Mr. Obrien). The apartment design would have been less beneficial for the neighborhood when compared to the Townhome project, for many reasons. All of these adjoining lots because of the size and shape face those same challenges and 3 of the lots are negatively impacting the community in their current state. The best usage of this lot at this time that is in compliance of the objectives of the comprehensive plan is to rezone and redesignate the MDR zoning to HDR zoning as well as changing the comprehensive plan in conjunction with this. 4. A statement of how the proposed amendment complies with and promotes the goals and specific requirements of the Growth Management Act. Urban Growth The Growth Management act encourages compact urban growth in areas served by urban Infrastructure. This proposal will further these goals by allowing development of not only this property but five adjoining lots that all face challenges because of their size and shape. This property was condemned eight plus years ago and has been a public hazard ever since. The properties that were built after and around this property on three sides are multifamily high density residential. Development of the property in HDR zoning is appropriate. Transportation with the addition of the light rail and currently being serviced by metro, the property does not propose a negative impact on the area. Housing the Growth Management Act encourages the availability of affordable housing and the proposal is directly in line with achieving this goal. These townhouses will be setting a new standard for entry level housing for families that would other wise be renting. This proposal will also help promote the goal of having a variety of residential housing in a zoning classification that does not have much ownership. HDR is mostly multifamily rentals owned by investors. Most owner occupied housing in Tukwila is in the MDR and LDR zones. This clearly is in line with the objectives of the Growth Management Act as well as a benefit to this community. Economic development because of the aesthetic impact as well as adding the pride of homeownership to this neighborhood that is mostly multifamily rental units we will have a continued enhancement of the community's economic well being. By immediately raising property values as well as promoting the retention and expansion of businesses and recruitment of new ones. Open space and recreation The Townhouse Design Manual complies with the Growth Management Act and in this case requires 400 square feet combined recreation space per dwelling unit. This project has exceeded that requirement and includes a centralized open recreation space in the center of the development. This complies with the Growth Management Act. Environment As discussed in this report this project contributes to the states high quality of life, in addition many green built type features such as permeable pavement, radiant heating and energy efficient appliances are incorporated into this project. The builder, architect, and civil engineer are making every effort possible to contribute to the environment as well. The systems that provide water and sewer to the site are being designed by Pace engineering to have as little impact as possible on the site. Any concessions to improve the air quality in the area will be considered, if applicable. 5. A statement of how the proposed amendment complies with applicable Countywide Planning Policies: I believe that by achieving most of the goals of the city's Comprehensive plan and the Growth Management Act that most of those reasons listed in this report by default make this proposed amendment in compliance with most of the Countywide Planning policies. Some sections of the CPP's that would apply include: LU -25 Insure for adequate zoning in the 20 year growth plan LU -28 Growth shall be directed toward areas with existing infrastructure facilities, as this property would do. LU -66 Provide for housing opportunities and a mix of housing types, there are very few Townhomes in Tukwila, this property is a great addition to the mix of housing options in the city. LU -69 Focusing on infill development; this property must be rezoned in order to allow the concurrently submitted townhome development to be built. Because of the fact that there are 5 property owners and one of them has to give up their land for recreation space, this does not make financial sense without rezoning. The 6 lots are currently zoned for 33 units and this plan involves building only 31. By allowing this amendment, not only this lot, but 5 others will be redeveloped as single family housing instead of multi family apartments. FW -24 creating diversity by adding a type of housing that there is very little of and by adding good quality housing which includes great open and recreation spaces in HDR. FW -25 Adding superior urban design in the immediate neighborhood, this area is in dire need of revitalization in the housing sector, this amendment will allow for a development that will show an example of quality living as well as adding to the ascetic's of the area. FW -28 by providing a variety of housing for all economic sectors of the population. This type of housing will be at an entry level price point and would provide an option for low income housing. AH -1 The city should have policies in place that allow them to review development standards and revise codes to provide the opportunity for diversity in types of dwelling units. AH -2 Achieving a rational and equitable distribution of affordable housing to meet the housing needs of low and moderate income residents in King County would certainly apply. ED -3 The city's comprehensive plan is to include economic development policies, the proposed amendment would contribute to the city's economic well being. ED -10 The project is trying to use all affordable green materials that help protect natural resources and try to provide green housing while still contributing to the economic growth of the area. RF -3 The jurisdiction shall adopt policies to stimulate construction of affordable housing in infill and redevelopment areas, this amendment would directly contribute to this goal. 6. A Statement of what changes, if any, would be required in functional plans if the proposed amendment is adopted: The proposal is not anticipated to affect the City's Functional Plans. The property will have a water and sewer mainline system that is going to be designed by Pace engineering and reviewed by Val Vue sewer and Water district #125. The storm water system was designed by civil engineer Bruce Macveigh and reviewed by Public Works. There are no shoreline issues with this property. 7. A statement of what capital improvements, if any, would be needed to support the proposed change, and how the proposed change will affect the capital facilities plans of the City: No capital improvements are anticipated in connection with this plan -level action. The proposal is not anticipated to affect the city's capital facilities plans. 8. A statement of what other changes, If any are required in other City codes, plans or regulations to implement the proposed change. The proposed Comprehensive Plan change requires a concurrent rezoning of the lot to HDR. PRO aid :A EI,EVATJ Q s ral. 11111 Lili 1',111 sly n: .1) JEW al stas !I 1111 UM Iiut Hill s Mill 11111 11111 IMMO lrttnlali IHu al ti s r3s 11 t 4 t 8111 P ti u i`:.:[i1 t l n I[lstr ot mut N/IIr1 ii u multi 7 7 I ll��:.11' l�il{ n 1111 .1 nsi:nrI 111 1't 111111111111 311 F :I! iH- 41!11 1!111! X 1 11 t rut t tt Nei 7., t rimy I: sli 1111 irit ►1 t. r s i I Ywfik 11► j r t 1 Sl` 1111,0.,„„ "LI U 3 �1 I W� mum 111 i 1 ®fit r 11 1111. m t 11! 111111 Ir I81! lu u 11111 0111 wW �a rf mai t: 1 JQfl. fi 13- 0- c(Rafed TA14 C RFAM 1'7 EA EVA 0 N iY:71`-oLl UtNLA, Al .00 ..611 Al I ,b;1! 1 HE Eirlirgr ragq lir': VI 111' IN1 II I 1 Emus EN 1111111111 VI 1111111111111 h ...111111111 1 virissmommu I I 1 !I 4Z fillin!!!ft! sii if hill Imm i i il a f...pr: Irli 1- I. 1:1:: pj.. i 11,1....... i.. i'illf'ilirit.7 u Il 2 i 1 t icsill i lilt t ri ll .1. 1 11i t iT111;f 1 i Ii t e li f l 11111 lif 171 r 1 El 1 Oil 1111 il IN r .:■:;!.11.1 um _I__ 1111 F ELEVATJO [1_ Yer.-( I- a'' 4411 II 1.1,11• t 11I i £ifl1 i f 1 ITLII.V.31011111 mrliqw%fivird ITN: 1!1: ip! !MI!! ircnpa ii ,41,41 11-1 1:1 III All I 1111 11111 1 II T LEVAT,Lart NMI MEN ir,.. t 1111111 i..1111.• tq II 1). It. rti 'el ill At li"' '1 BUSSE sinerul 1111111MilitellINSW011111 N., let It. 41 hill hill, •t1 I 1 I. I 101 .E[Lif [11 NI rjuiu llilil 1 Mil ISM gill rti IP PRII 'UT a ?ii,11,4)...a.itmi:111f Hilt 111 1:1 7' :Alum 4pItitfi cfsegi tri nrs t li h,... Ari ptin a it., a HII i 14 riairi i 1 ;;17...1 NIIIIIIIL. ......1 ?;.1: AM muniselt 1111, IA! keff ELEV./ 6 \D o N 10= Lo" LIIT4 elyv& Sm. 0— ,r. Cr- CITY OF TUKWILA ATTACHMENT G APPLICATION Planner: Application Complete (Date: 3/5/ t: Application Incomplete (Date: /2101 Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P ZCA LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). P: \Planning Forms \Applications \2007 Applications \ZoneChng- 12- 07.doc 12 -07 L-vf3 071 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR The individual who: has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: M l 1\'r QVC Cf" h' Address: I -)(ir r- 4 J f 1 ii Phone: :k.(o Sic: I: gI i E -mail: 110 t kre _P) IRO al L.e� /l■ Signature: Date: 120� /00 ZONING, CQDE AMENDMENTS File Number: 7 4 Cf Project File Number: Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: O e f P r 1: o( -)A i1oA1 e S LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. `1 20 (y .f 2 Z `7''-/ Z y n 'ti /9- S v>rw/ /4- _.64[)000rrc1 J o oci 000oOb3 OC) cX)edo►0 09 631 11l oeoO 631 11 boo 0 0 OCL OOOo 7d& G'J)k 1 I Lo e FAX: 7c& `t' 3/ S6t i Z topf- A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: MO Q. Proposed: I O (Z- B. ZONING DESIGNATION: Existing: Proposed: Existing: Proposed: C. LAND USE(S): (for pro changes in land use designations or rezones) P: \Planning Forms Applications \2007 Applications \ZoneChng- 12- 07.doc 12 -07 fi Loaf 5 COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted at a later date for use at the public hearing (e.g. colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vest the applicant's rights. However, the City may require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 431 -3670 (Depai went of Community Development) and 206 -433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). Check items Information Required. May be waived in unusual cases, upon approval of both Public Works submitted and Planning with application APPLICATION MATERIALS: 1 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. 1 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (4 copies, if applying for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment do not duplicate materials). 7 3. Completed and notarized Affidavit of Ownership and Hold Harmless Permission to Enter Property (1 copy attached). 1 4. One set of any plans reduced to either 8 1/2" by 11" or 11" by 17 1 5. Application Fee —$615 1 1 6. Comprehensive Plan Amendment with fee if requesting a map change, do not duplicate materials. 7. SEPA Environmental Checklist with fee once application is referred by the City Council to the Planning Commission for review. 9eS t i its S PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 9 e 1 8. Provide a strikeout /underline version of the proposed code change, if applicable. 9. Provide any other information such as drawings, economic analysis or other material that may be helpful to the Planning Commission and City Council in evaluating your reauest. 1 10. Provide a written response to the criteria listed at 18.84.030 (included in packet). P: \Planning Forms \Applications \2007 Applications \ZoneChng- 12- 07.doc 12 -07 EXECUTED at f7J E14— 6 On this day personally appeared executed the foregoing instrument purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, IVA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E- mail.' tuknlan4rci.tukl iI 1. u.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: I. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, a ents engineers, contractors r other repreee tatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at �j 64, r)4 U/1 AA 1,1 t.✓pf CJ 916, 0 for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. ss (city), 1, 6 (state), on Print Name Address Phone Number rest P \Planning Forms \Applications \2007 Applications 11ARApp -12 -07 doc, 12/07/07 1 14 (!r C QJ•'f r 1- f 20 S. 7c) 57 Tdh. :/4 9i/G 20in. 21 7 (o 5 Signature before me NI to me known to be the individual who and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his /her voluntary act and deed for the uses and BEFORE ME ON THIS 16 tk DAY OF D�C-ESv1 (L. 20 C NOT RY PUBLli �h1 t Washingt MOKHEA R LONG g ntjy Appointmeptt d3 p86� 2I 2W 1 My oThrrIl§sti s ,20O On this day personally appeared executed the toregoing instrument purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tubnlan'u 6.1.111: ila. ul.us STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its e J m loyees, agents, ej, sneers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at l y _I 2 3 `1 r A u c. S- 1 U 1 1 !7 16 g for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at ICJ re✓' (city), Litt I (state), onL L`�'' 20 Print Name 6 IKe 0 e Eck-- Address Phone Number Signature before me Y r t no ET__ (3 co to me known to be the individual who and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and BEFORE ME ON THIS 1U11 DAY OF }'EC_L to (72,Z(2._ 20 C= tS NOTAR residing My Co P:\ Planning Forms Applications \2007 Applications\ BARApp- 12- 07.doc, 12/07/07 1-1620 S l f r" -t<, 20(0.21'3. 6357 w v w w w w T w w 1 t/ C4!- `j e 8 Notary Public Stattasbio (A) MONTHEA R LONri micgrl Expires 2,12Q11 2 n I November 14, 2008 To: City of Tukwila From: Mike Overbeck, Osterly Park Townhomes 4620 S 148 St. Tukwila, WA 98168 Re: Zoning code Amendment Criteria (TMC 18.84.030) Each deteiniination granting a rezone shall be supported by written findings and conclusions, showing specifically that all of the following conditions exist: 1. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to redesignate the property (3421 S. 144 St) from MDR to HDR is proposed concurrent with this rezone request. With this amendment the Comprehensive Plan land use map and the zoning will be consistent. In addition, the proposal is consistent with numerous goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. These include improving and sustaining the residential neighborhood quality and livability, contributing to a developing and thriving neighborhood community as a true regional concentration of housing, providing home ownership to support local retail businesses and promote economical growth. This proposal will also contribute in other ways to various small objectives of the Compressive Plan. 2. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is consistent with the scope and purpose of this title and the description and purpose of the zone classification applied for. The purpose of MDR zoning through standards provided by this district are set forth in TMC 18.12.010. The reason for this rezone was derived from the need to place the common recreation space in a center location of the submitted development to adhere to the guidelines of the Townhouse Design Manual, as well as recommendations by the planning staff of the city. By changing the zoning to HDR this will allow this goal to be accomplished. Due to all of the other regulations and staff recommendations already adhered to in the design, by default, not only does this lot but the other five HDR lots as well conform to the goals listed in TMC 18.12.010. The only exception needed is to increase the number of units on this lot from three to five units. Also, please note that this project is 5 HDR lots and only 1 MDR lot (subject of rezone) and is currently allowing for 33 units. This project is only 31 units. 3. There are changed conditions since the previous zoning became effective to warrant the proposed amendment to the zoning map. At the time of the last zoning map as well as appears to be the case when the original map was created around pre- existing structures in this area, the last four lots starting on the south side of 144 Ave South at the intersection of South 144th and 34 Ave South going back towards TIB were single family houses. Three of these parcels are zoned MDR (including the subject of this request, 3421 South 144 St.) and the last of which is zoned HDR. The HDR zoned lot as well as 3421 South 144 St., an MDR zoned lot are in the townhouse development submitted at the same time as this rezoning request. Since the year 2001 however, the single family dwellings on these two lots have not been lived in. The house located at 3421 has been condemned by the health Department of King County since 2000 and the house located at 3429 S. 144 St. was removed a few years later and has been a vacant lot since then. At this time the most productive use proposed has been to include this parcel in the townhouse development and allow all six lots to be an addition to sustaining the neighborhood quality and livability. The previous owner of the lot located at 3429 S 144 St. tried to build an 8 unit apartment complex and was unable to come up with a design to fit the narrow lot. A problem all 6 of these lots would have if not joined together. As this neighorhood has gone through changes the need for a rezone is beneficial to the communities rebuilding. 4. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map will be in the interest of furtherance of the public health, safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare, and will not adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood, nor be injurious to other properties in the vicinity in which the subject property is located. The benefits to the public associated with the proposal have been discussed in connection with the Comprehensive Plan amendment. In addition, analysis shows that the proposal will have no significant adverse impacts on the neighborhood or the future development of lots in the area. The proposed amendment is in the public interest, as has been discussed and demonstrated by the drawings and narratives given in support of this proposal. In addition the amendment will in no way be injurious to the surrounding Neighborhood/ Vicinity it is located in. c( R TAt� Coon q 1 1 Ei 0J- in rff ii i i piut !1#I1Tf!E Y `iltf 1Id' I 111111111111111 V fil' I rP {ir I/ {l il tii %ll E' Run !Tr 45 4nt 'ifJt ::tm:tYlU1:1if _tl9H72 :r Y %'Ii i i 1 I1 1 1 raf IG'.11i 1r MIN uiii: 11111 MN ISM t i Mil W 1 lei 1,- -A, .Kr 1 1er 1 Lo" 0= Ye)" L a- TAd COREL 'eV 1 1.11111111111 rrErrFriirtm 3, ”talsirmr: gitt t r nu sj in mu Id uIa mum Ea 41 41k1 !I 1 MO 111 UM 1 Lim- a Lot: um in tr El 14, v i-tri Fai in in i M' filtrflIIII nummdrituristErstiin wpm trukri ilt NII4i i' iii I :i II ill Emmi u `!i PInlj p'101 11,1f!!!!!r !fip 1 i. i„,,,,,„„„. I NEW!, na l to o I 1' i. inp rara 11 Illi II 1 1 ill 1 III I 'll -2 INE11111 I align' arnalsa....■ 'Hi t: UM 1r FRb EL,,EVADoN 'Yr/ Lou 0117: fflrI Yecl- 0' o- Ljqtq- MA-L4V 131440..., 1 ALL r iti■ XIS= HMV Ullt 1 0111 E••• Wit t 11111111 .11 011 141 II1I .1: -I- 111111.11111 1 I Ell 11 '911 1.1111111 itgylm 1 kz...÷-zwo,cfrzi =wt.. 717 111 1_1J 33133 _WM 11. 3310 111i 1u 1 •111111I 11 1 lama 111 r n ti iiiinwanint EVAT1 oN 1.1p/ITA ELT IATtOrt qy. 0- 0- L.1414 -T ci RV w Wit orrnIn .ti Lout', .ar ttt Illliil -1 Ai "F t 3,11; I. ilHa� tl i,l r; 1!r.' t iii �ii� ®lip i X1 r 11111111113 gg 171 111115, 1111UMIEW131111 U'i 1.111 :31111]( 11' 3itt SYi7: 3.iHW; Ft11t31/ '11 1F ;1 11, 111_111 )1111 ill 1 I: e lill 111 ti iI!1 [�u 11 11111'1 ,t 1 I Hilt ra:i_r E is tt. kb MI -aus' I. 1111E aim Intl 1M1! 11111 Ul 11 RlHI; 1111 Hill ll' 1111111 1 ;f 111 r Pq 1 f il'w imi vile, 1;11 "91 ii:( Yw11killt.: 1 1,.111 liana i r 1111111 NOM Ir■■l�1 r ■11IILu.rn ret .wi 111A' 1#11 Ft. Ott`' i t. 1 1 6 A tti .41 6 i r ti.,,EVATIaN /Or- 11 cr- r.1 00 0- 2. 1 14 i\)r %NCr--) 1 Nmi u Lt.. 1 34:1: 4. .r. 0, D i :r r e 17 7 r 1 1' I V.' .14 f :A: ;4 P.'e, I f ,1 W r• 'I' I 1 ir ..•••'1 4 F.,,.. ....'F fiorkR 1 l'r U 9 1 Il. r. Uieili. •7 r t I .;',..;A: rr.:_: v A I ,cd if:14 2.: Y Et ....L 1. l 1", i .,4,_.- r.. ...1 .i::.., .1., a I 1 tj 1 ,t1" 1.__ 1 IL' 41 'Po 6 V. 41!',. ;::F, L :10: ,2...:. A 4.• 'Ir. 15, 0 if .1' 4t ..1';''' 4 ,9 1.. AZ, "5 7 ri ...l... a A A r: r A ;1,- x I I Arl Pk...:.• tf L 1 n.' k.:1 1.,' crl A,■ ,..r.,., A Y. :5 21, 2 T t. 4.44 ;.4 1.4 :-1' 'IP "Ir. '4" n e..4. I) 1 4 ,,,..4 Ir.: 1'V. L r; f N+4 dio 1 I. .-4 2 NO 1 111 2 1i licl! I 111 11 l o.'•= 1 1 I LI.___ i i _I::: i:- .v. vit I I 411 t• Lit 11! It I I 1. I) t I- 1 I I lIi 11 Utt II: t-., 1 ..9f 1 1 Le.sam AC. Sou e' 4 4/ _S 1 i i.) 115ce11.% 1 I Immu lc.;:;•, 'r 4,-(.■••-■4“ al „aik •T I. 1 1 .P. T,1 .f. 2. K■ ;.,-.7!4...;4,7:,...;77-:-717.!4 I au, YU IP 1 .1-7... L1. -71 "A i.;,..... p'1,-IL, C7coro nn 17. Cana II 1 6.71 31 ret .1.1.. ro crap 1 .,I;i0' 1 I r e I J. 1 1 LISGAL DESCRIPTION I 45 I! 1 r• 1 1 1 I I( I ,i la 3 i i I ,,,•:..3, ICI 2. 113017.. 3 0301>1!> 0 nal,. LS 300 3131 1 i NI r030.1 li srA.... 11 Or- 7 .1, on01. a.. FCCOCCIEN VOI. AN' 11 PLLIS. Oa.: .2 3.07 Of <11 QS I „r1 ;77: 1 .7 yr olil 10 ,r1 10.:Or CON, TVI: 30 INNG CrIUNIV 0 A 13.-:' I i 9, 1 -s, 7: I 1 loE .91M -la. V LOf a. Ir., C. :CA. nnwc MSC, S. ACCOR10111, IN I, Pc, 1,217.3 P.31.07177) O ,11 l■ rra FSLIC SI, IN ONI. C.SINIY. /rf 1 1 C.-;:a Ll' rt72 L‘,r 7 .,:-.:74 4 r,-„Ora, 3 OLCIS, ACI.11.112 70 ITE TKOs, NECOr10. 31 I, 1.1.1.0, L1:(. 1•E rlr•711 IS rE, SI.Or, L0L o 1 PIJOS 1.3r. te-3.7. REC., I:{ ioriC TO! EASI IS ICIII NCO I, SIC 0.• 2. .31.1. WV: Ir .22 11113 III r 0,11, SO.- MO, 3..0. 31 O IC. 1 Or WM,. Z220 --1 _L. GRAPIIIC FC ALF. 00 S*7 0.7.7o Nat C,N71 rr 6:1 Caner.. laor..men1 n Cc. ent .774 lead ca 5, .0, ./7 1 1. 7 7.7 pIot 7r WU 4,3 33 SA 130,0400n Ire. 000 '1041> 0c-en Sam. Orrroro 1,0 1.11,11 C.1 cetpt- e.rml Sl.:1 eying 1,.. 1 ....4.1 1.!1,,, ?.17,7-,-,,,, 1 .,,.3 2 ,.U.1,, 1...,!. r'' -,1 i .1 ...1., i. 1 1, ir.:' 1; :..i.r. i' tc.,. I 6", „i z 4 r,..-11 LICotr.f.c; i ti 0 I,; .!J Lf e. t 1 1 1 tIO Lip; i f 4 4 1 1 ,4 1 i r I 1 i .4 4 4 I: 1 i I k• .;"1' -4 i 1 1 .',11: ^1 r 0 4 4 1 4. 7:11 11 LPL 1.111 1' 1,, 1...1 ,,sq...., re1-1,.0 1•01.19 ,47.k: rr r.'''' i 1 ‘LI/III...c f;';' 1,1,, •1;1 ',u...,,,, K i k...-3•1 i r HP:, ...,17.-/-, ...Pe: Vf....", prri, K6k,14.:".I. P r L. 4.,.••• 1. 'IL. Jr...es L. ifi; it! 1,.r. FIJ-1, L. L. L 1..• p k •C12GtflI4 ,k 1..‘o,.., N. ?•LaelLL. pr...: 00 ,L.. /.1 ,..k I-I :rep kILsra, /.1,..10. 11 it. k" '.1 .f 1J T -,...,-,y.,1, F.- g.,,,,,,7,,,, ',fr. 1.1... V,. al' ..lfir .II.,LI. _.;''.41,... .114 IL/. L. ;•:,?.1-f, 1.; •!!45 'hi. 11 f At, f.. 1 1 ....If, 1 1:.' 19r AI 1 W Y ,r, 4g. ,fr. ...cf. M. 3 ;CI .I. .17 11 1:11 k ',IT r,I c411 AV), IPA,,,I. ,k k.;.;.; c, f 1 1 A 11 ,iri. ,f,, ,n r.l. 44 .4,1 411.1. 11* ZE7 ■-..4 ';'4 1 i. r'.,...4. 4,1e• c!Y 41 ;•1 11 1 I ;flir• 1 01 ll 2 1I M C,.,Pr 12 11 14 1. ,1 ."V1. to,:;Ati.T i 4q17 7 .'7:7(...7■0.17.17'EP11',7 l'. 10 711 12 01, 0..• 1.4.2 V 17? ivo.7 :7,1, 1 7 1 70- L''1 1 1. 1 1 :17 0 7... 10 7 —11 7 11 1 .7 1 7 1 1 1' 1 n A Df .d.: 7 0 0-4; 1 C.7 1 1 7 i .1 .1,1• 7 ,7.,,......,., Ja..-711...1/116,77, :1.7 ...T., LE:17-1P71,- 7 7-4,.... -1 20 if. .11,.,. ...1... 1 DJ ......,,As N OE 4 ,c, 1 k'll.;.l'ii.7;':,.., i EL" '1:40,, .::::'.':1 11 i iC NI,I.:-.. 17,,,,,,ig 07,/v v LUI. 1 1 I 1! 0."'' ill• V) 1 0, F- RF tr.—.4., 3 2.)Pi,flie LW ,,..i, 11 1 0 !id:j P■... ...1 ,o.ac 44r /...i. li.:?. 4 ':■1''. 5,5, 5,5, :i /ail fig .7. ;1 ;t 1r. 1 0 NO 0 2 0 r, ‘4 ,7,;:,: E j w i Liii ii Ai; T V, ej Al% ■1 lf, ■L'o.',1. P ow Fel-, ,0'.7... I i .:■■■774' ,7 2 "TT:. yf. 7 705. !:7•-• fi] 1 0 4 1A1413Sri1PE PLAN CALCULA11015. Ro1Lied__Tygl:andauoing1per TMC to t�20301 npp: a0 Wabeons Muds Mora phase al development) Tctal Lineal Feel d Ropey L110 Perimeter 1.504 U. Tcal linen) Feel N Padmo0r Curb CrCS 4811. Tole] Unod Feet of Perim., for Landscape Cab/edam 1,004-48 Tdd lineal Feet of Pe nmw lot Wtlscipo CYala0Ona -1,]58 Ra1Wea Tress 1 oar 301heal lea of req. pesnahr (esdWlnp 04064,) Rep,ded Trees 125815/30 00Wmd Trees 42 Regdrod Faapre6n Treat T5%d Req Tres Requlmd Everyman Irmo ?SS a 42 Reg,. Eamgroan Trace 32 Rq(gea netlduow Trees Roo Tleas 004. Emrysvn Tram Required Deaduous twee 42.32 Rory4r03 Dedduow Twos -10 Required ;Mims 1 pet K1eel lad al 43 pa1rma (6411068 ant 444 Rquaad Shrubs 185811 Required 61,400 -100 RSairod Eerproon lyxubs 75% 01 850(0 Shuts Rep1rad E.erpreon Slots 7631 150 Required Eva4140n %vim 135 Regorged Drrnduuus 50mos Reg 6h ib5 -Req. Ewrpreee %nix Ranked 50002aus Shrum 110.135 P.NNLI D0cldmus Shr106 -45 Perimeter Evergreen Imes Required 32 Perimeear Ewrprool boo. 1004081 30 PO 6nater Dedduae Trees Required. 10 PDMtaa Dodducus Twee Howled -14 Perim.. Ewrpmel SMrbs Ragdred 135 Perimeter Ewrgoon SI•nam Prwked -115 Pa1m8er Ded0uats 5 Rqulrsd 45 Psdmetu Dedd,rau Siwbs Provided 58 LANOSCAPF. MAN LEGEND: E :::I Mae 01 TN. I lars4cepo Patmerar Ipar TMC 1662030) 2 Proposed 1065reen Tree ,X P,004603548030603106 0 Prop08ed 611ub l Iron Am al ammsnul 0040,3)14100008 j i1 5 :I Pd.!. Romanian Area (w/square loc< Punta. Pewg 1,615 plume d development A20 penmerer lalca (lrp.) B24 r-- a play eq(10411 00 wlrea4 aspepd J 11 nd WI moo mahml wnWtp Iron bd;vd mva J r I! 1 n 4nalloo tupani4J. area r -1 I- r 11 ,4cIIT� s K 7_9.1 A5 1�1 AT "•rJL Lam_ 50001144th 55601 Inca 72p.) I A16 0' (D AI4 A15 y I I I Al2 811 Osterly Park Townhomes 3429 South 144th Street Tukwila, Washington pm3ct number: 200810:5 drawn: JAF checked: Sindo 342 data issue /mJsun 0/192305 PgeSm Renew Landscape Plan L -1 0 14 k 40 SCALE NORp1 0540005,-e,oa.- a. -aue 20 aem S,FN =Rn nFCIf.N ..D,FS 1. ALL UTILIDES TO BE UNDERGROUND. 2. PRIMARY IRTUTY LINES ARE SHOWN. STUBS ARO SERVICES TO INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS ARE OMITTED FOR CLARITY. 3. SEPARATE DESIGNS FOR THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM AND THE WATER MAIN SYSTEM WILL BE PREPARED AND APPROVED 1311AL VUE SEWER DISTRICT AND WATER DISTRICT 125 RESPECTIVELY AS WELL AS THE CITY OF TUKWILA 4. SIZES Of UTILITY LINES ANO DETENTION STORAGE, AS WELL AS LOCATORS, AS SHOWN ARE PRELIMINARY ONLY AND NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. 5. THE SOILS OF THE 5(TE ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR DRAINAGE INFILTRATION COLLECTED RUNOFF FROM THE SITE WILL BE DETAINED IN UNDERGROUND STORAGE AND RELEASED TO THE STREET SYSTEM IN 8.11470 STREET. TOP001V+P100 NOTES 1. THE IDOSTNO TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE 19 SHOWN ON THIS CONCEPTUAL PLAN. THE NORTHERN LEG OF THE PROPERTY IS VERY LEVEL THE WESTERN LEG SLOPES UPWARD SLIGHTLY TO THE WEST. 2 THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL ALTER THE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY VERY LITTLE FOR CLARITY, PRELIMINARY 2 FOOT DESIGN CONTOURS ARE SHOWN. 3. THE BUILDING GROUND FLOOR FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS ARE CONCEPTUAL AT THIS POINT AND FINAL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON FORMAL DESIGN PUNS MAY VARY FROM THOSE SHOWN. THOSE SHOWN SHOULD NOT SE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. f I R r' q 1 I e N1 ♦n It O c +Et is•rr _l I L� j 541,E f t y ,s 119. w 30' 25' I 3 PROJECT PNA51N4 80180' 1. D IS PROPOSED TO CONSTRUCT THE PROJECT W ONE EXTENDED PHASE 2. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE COMMON INFRASTRUCTURE WILL BE COORDINATED INTEGRALLY WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW HOMES. THE INTENT IS TO PROVIDE COMPLETED COMMON INFRASTRUCTURE SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH HOME COMPLETION. 3. THE FNIAL PAVING OF THE ACCESS ROAD IS RECOMMENDED FOR DIFFERAL TO THE LATER STAGES OF HOME CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT DAMAGE BY CONCRETE TRUCKS AND OTHER HEAVY CONSTRUCTION EOUIPMENT. 4 CONSTRUCTOR OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND NEW HOMES ON PARCEL NUMBERS 004000-0087, 630110.0000 AND 570111 -0000 WOULD BE COORDINATED WITH THE SEPARATE OWNER OF THOSE THREE PARCELS TO PROVIDE AN UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT EFFORT. 254 EARTHWORK ESTIMATES: CUT 2,030 CY FILL 3,040 CY TOTAL 0,570 CY 441558510418 RLRiFar... 0861188 21,790 SF 050 AC PROPOSED 40,790 SF 1.12 AC 70 84 I 210. SITE FL.Ati s o u1H I _4( lOA4: 00270000.00 f44100µ ,01 -1S JIY. 45,5_ KEG. :S30 S t•.rr' i 0S I.S 10 0 0 •1 Fr 5 5-4. n I X 9 51' 6 0F. 1,1 I 11 ca ir I r A[ I f f 10 ,08 Z. 956 351. 804 8,55. S X5 90.0 4 10 .0' ti ipf "t- 1 --22- T t 3 -f- T--1 6P f 8 ss1.5I I t /i' I t I X e I I a I I Ii ,m fp T 1 I I ff I 1 02 L 3s b I 1 6 1SA 1 61 •!r J I I -1 I E• sr e r• oL goof if Ste, 7 8 I j" 6 h N 101 T 11- j{ 4s Z 5 R p p �GL. SAC jt6 f p A 64 11 Ti 4 r d 10 Ij 0. A.-31 46 Of- S f f 251 .d SA 1 48.75' N h C KN. SOIL LOGS MIKE OVERBECK BETE 21 APR DT D 1 r windy CUY v./cobbles and oo+u5. 6.bt. s, nlode+••tl dn..) 1e 410 sandy CIA? wlwbbr .nd constr. d.bd. DIA dams) 44 -Pr mean.BAHD*one 4.1.84* d.n Mown) 96 7010+ CUY (pry, md0ed) WATER AT 84 0 sandy CLAY wkobbl.s and m1*. d.18b L •,0d•1••4 don.) 12.70 sandy CUY wbobbles wld owes.. debt. OF dn..) 30 TT n1.d.Fn SAND wimp l.I.endy don (O••N 72 -108• CUY (m, mo0.d) WATER AT 72 00. 110 8984y CLAY n400bbbs nd mast. d.bt1. 0111. modr..Ndn1..) 15 -55 **My CLAY rioobb.. con*. d.bt. (H,d.1�.) 30 84• sandy d..y LOAM (poly one) M -7010. CLAY Gm. moltl.4) WATER AT 84• 0 tr .ndy CUrwaobb 0. and con*. debit dn. moMnW Ones) 14 •Tr sandy CLAY .4 801.. and an*. d41444 (IN&IN.) 72 -1010 .ndy d•Y•Y LOAM (peaty 108. CLAY (pry, n..d) WATER AT 124 2 -R fi n• 57aRH Dr7'ri477IN V/Rra'bl 5.71Y Cf eF 1 4- I I plwrU .•wI '41" 8.0 Incremental Storage Volumes a•• ee•••••e +.•w..•.., f— !D k r lr*Inemin0 of animis 12.0 Detail Drawings Tees e. Y•4„DM _.,eeM W1M CI.Wr On a rJy 1 V9 _U.�; r _IL .Qa L J It u WTI! ■00110,015,041/14 wwsry e 3� 1 5 MOS L1_ M Y +—a 1•1191:4•171,4•911(11•17 I VERTICAL CURB TYPE ROADWAY I te 1 w �1 unm .n..r (1 00=1, M RAM Rip a.er.,•1•1111• 3.•L• 1 muss CURB DETAILS w PIE IMMINI118•1•111101, LEE' CURB CUTTER SECTION DRIVEWAY I Zt 2 f 2 SOIL LOGS MIKE OVERBECK SITE 21 APR 07 SL 1 0 18" sandy CLAY w /cobbles and constr. debris (fill, moderately dense) 18 48" sandy CLAY w /cobbles and constr. debris (fill, dense) 48 96" medium SAND w /some silt, relatively clean (brown) 96 108 CLAY (gray, mottled) WATER AT 84" SL 2 0 12" sandy CLAY w /cobbles and constr. debris (fill, moderately dense) 12 30" sandy CLAY w /cobbles and constr. debris (fill, dense) 30 72" medium SAND w /some silt, relatively clean (brown) 72 108 CLAY (gray, mottled) WATER AT 72" SL 3 0 16" sandy CLAY w /cobbles and constr. debris (fill, moderately dense) 16 36" sandy CLAY w /cobbles and constr. debris (fill, dense) 36 84" sandy clayey LOAM (peaty smell) 84 108 CLAY (gray, mottled) WATER AT 84" SL 4 0 18" sandy CLAY w /cobbles and constr. debris (fill, moderately dense) 18 72" sandy CLAY w /cobbles and constr. debris (fill, dense) 72 108" sandy clayey LOAM (peaty smell) 108 132 CLAY (gray, mottled) WATER AT 120" URBAN REI■ EWAL AREA OVERLAY DISTRICT File #L08 -081 Comprehensive Plan Amendment File #L08 -082 Rezone •EMNON! O St 1 J MD RM HDR I® HDR MDR 1 Tukwila Village Project Zoning Lines r A Commercial Redevelopment Areas NCC Proposed Commercial Redevelopment Area Proposed Urban Renewal Overlay District 172 rb: !ICC S142St (b. i s 146 St 141 DR MDR RC e:Na®9ftmanaa mivaar a�ama®ai�aeli6 ikiii iiii'iiiiii6 la LepRI 1 1 1 1 6 .1 1 250 feef L08 -081 Comprehensive Plan Amendment- Urban Renewal Overlay District L08 -082 Rezone /Overlay District -Urban Renewal Overlay District Attachment H Planner: �Zebe CCA— Application Complete (Date:3 -3-0d1 Application Incomplete (Date: CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us arming For Applications \CompPlanChg 6 -06 .doc FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P -CPA Fos File Number: ATTACHMENT 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS Log oSI Project File Number: Other File Numbers: Lo o m o' L NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Tukwila International Boulevard Transit Oriented Development Overlay Zone ris LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. All properties within OO feat of Tukwila International Boulevard between South 140th Street and SouLh 160th Stutht LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). List to be provided at later time due to extent of area under _consideration. DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR The individual who: has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Derek Speck Address: 6200 Southcenter Blvd: Tukwila WA 98188 Phone: 206 433 1832 FAX: 206 433 7 191 E mail: dspec ci. ukwiila.wa. Signature: Date: r December 4, 2006 A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: HDR, NCC, RC Proposed: Same designations except with adcHt.icn of an overlay zone. B. ZONING DESIGNATION: Existing: HDR, NCC, RC Proposed: :.Same designations except with addition of an overlay zone. LAND USE(S): Existing: Hotels /motels, retail, apartments, auto sales, religious Proposed: Same uses except encourages mixed -use with residential over commercial. D. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING LAND USES: Describe the existing uses located within 1,000 feet in all directions from the property or area for which a change is proposed. In addition to land uses described above, surrounding land uses include office, light industrial, warehouse,auto repair, multi- family residential and single family residential_ P: \Planning Forms Applications \CompPlanChg- 6- 06.doc (for proposed changes in land use designations or rezones) December 4, 2006 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING EXECUTED at Tukwila P-` Tanning Forms Applications \ZoneChng- 6- 06.doc CITY OF T UK LA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 1 AX (206) 431 3665 E mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us, AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at North= t =nd soh orn ^r^ of r=1. r 1 44th for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non responsiveness t� a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. (city), WA (state), on December 26 20 08 Print Name Derek Speck (1) Owner Representative Address Phone Number Signature 6200 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila, WA 206 -433 -1832 On this day personally appeared before me 0 e r e- �c,. 519 c L to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged thatrhdshe signed the same as(1islher voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. ��JJ SUBSCRIBED AND S,lkd,,6fl l�lti�' BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF �J-� I- U'vv- b Q 1 ate of Whington NOTARY PUBLIC in and for t �3c.r lo on W 1 3 2_1 —t7) ,20 0 residing at My Commission expires December 4, 2006 Summary Tukwila International Boulevard Urban Renewal Area /Transit Oriented Development Overlay District Comprehensive Plan Amendment This application proposes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code to create an overlay district for commercial, commercial redevelopment area and multi- family zoned properties within the Urban Renewal Area along Tukwila International Boulevard. The Urban Renewal Area was designated in the January, 2000 "Tukwila International Boulevard Plan— Revitalization and Urban Renewal" as part of the redevelopment planning process. Chapter 35.81 RCW required the designation of an Urban Renewal Area and plan for City partnership in private development. The proposed overlay district generally lies between S. 140 Street, 37 Avenue South, S. 146 and 42 Avenue S. The LDR -zoned properties on the west side of 42 Avenue South between S. 146 and S. 144 will be excluded from the overlay since recent redevelopment and the presence of wetlands make them unsuited for higher intensity development. The LDR -zoned property north of S 144 will be designated a Commercial Redevelopment Area and, if redeveloped as part of a project in the overlay district, would be permitted to apply the uses and standards of the adjacent commercial district (TMC 18.60.060). The intent of the overlay district is to encourage the redevelopment of distressed areas (i.e. the Urban Renewal area on Tukwila International Boulevard) with a compact, transit oriented development pattern including neighborhood serving services and retail, more pedestrian friendly site design, high quality materials and attractive projects. The proposed overlay district would leave the existing zoning in place and would not change development standards for the underlying zones including Medium Density Residential (MDR), High Density Residential (HDR), and Neighborhood Commercial Center (NCC). However, the overlay would provide some additional alternative development standards that could be applied to developments within the overlay district upon request of the property owner and if the developments meet certain qualifying criteria. The proposed overlay district's basic alternative development standards include: 1) allowing building heights of up to 65 feet; 2) reducing the required parking spaces for multi family development; 3) deteiniining the maximum number of dwelling units by the building envelope; and 4) allowing live /work space on the ground floor of the Neighborhood Commercial Center zone. The applicant would request to use the alternative development standards and the project would be required to meet specific criteria, such as providing structured parking, requiring leases that prohibit on- street parking, and others. Specific development standards are proposed in the accompanying rezone application (File #L08 -082). Rf 1 04/22/2009 H: \COMP PLAN 2008 2009 \L08 -081& 82 T.O.D. Overlay.Tuk.Intl.Blvd\TOD-TIB-- CPA- Application #3.rev.4.19.09.doc A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Criteria (TMC 18.80.0501 Demonstrate how each of the following circumstances justifies a re- designation of your property or a change in existing Plan policies (1) Describe how the issue is addressed in the Comorehensive Plan. If the issue is not adequately addressed. is there a need for the proposed change? Per Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan, "To redevelop and reinvigorate the Pacific Highway Corridor" is the #2 priority of the four major objectives. An additional goal and policies to redevelop Tukwila International Boulevard are spelled out in the "Transportation Corridors" element, including Goal 8.2 and Policies 8.2.1 through 8.2.21. Goal 8.2 Pacific Highway Corridor Goal provides a sense of the importance of Tukwila International Boulevard redevelopment as follows: "A Pacific Highway corridor that is an attractive, safe and profitable place to live, do business, shop and work, and is a positive reflection of the City as a whole and of the surrounding residential and business community." Policy 8.2.1. Mitigate transportation impacts associated with regional travel by the use of extensive amenities, transit service, and appropriate siting and design of new uses, including the highway itself. The Urban Renewal Area overlay is needed to supplement and strengthen the Comprehensive Plan policies relating to Tukwila International Boulevard, as well as the adopted "Tukwila International Boulevard Plan" (January, 2000) and the Tukwila Intemational Boulevard Design Manual (January, 1999) by providing guidance to spur redevelopment and to take full advantage of bus routes along Tukwila International Boulevard, and Sound Transit light rail located at S. 154 The proposed overlay district will encourage redevelopment of underutilized properties that are included in the designated Urban Renewal Area, and would provide the maximum opportunity for private enterprise that is consistent with City of Tukwila goals and public needs. This will enhance the general desirability of the area with high quality, compact and transit oriented development. (2) Whv is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? What other options are there for meeting the identified public need? The Comprehensive Plan and Tukwila International Boulevard Revitalization and Urban Renewal Plan (2000) identify a public need for an "attractive, safe and profitable place to live, do business, shop and work" along Tukwila International Boulevard. The Urban Renewal Area between South 140 Street and South 146 has Rf 2 04/22/2009 H: \COMP PLAN 2008 2009 \L08 -081& 82 T.O.D. Overlay.Tuk.Intl.Blvd\TOD-TIB-- CPA- Application #3.rev.4.19.09.doc been a special focus. The City has taken many steps to foster a vibrant neighborhood, including installing new streets, curbs, wide sidewalks and gutters, undergrounding utilities, creating a new park, cleaning up trash, instituting design guidelines, working with community groups, and strongly emphasizing policing measures to improve safety. The Comprehensive Plan encourages excellent design with pedestrian and other amenities but the height and parking requirements make those projects economically infeasible. An overlay district provides a targeted means to address this identified need and to spur redevelopment in a specific location. The overlay zone makes compact development more feasible with additional pedestrian amenities, structured parking, reduced residential parking requirements and taller structures. This type of development would create opportunities for additional commercial and residential opportunities to address the identified public need for community revitalization. Alternate methods could be to: 1) change the requirements of the underlying MDR, HDR and NCC zones; 2) prepare individual development agreements for new development along Tukwila International Boulevard; or 3) designate a Transit Oriented Development overlay along the length of Tukwila Boulevard to the Sound Transit Station at S. 154th. (3) Why will the proposed change result in a net benefit to the community? If not. what type. of benefit can be expected and whv? The proposed changes will foster a more vibrant and cohesive community by making compact design more economically feasible; allowing more dwelling units which bring more people into the neighborhood to walk, shop, eat, and play; and by requiring development amenities that make a more attractive, interesting neighborhood. B. Comnrehensive Plan Amendment Criteria (TMC 18.80.010) (1) A detailed statement of what is proposed and whv The applicant proposes to amend the Comprehensive Plan to add the following policy: Policy 8.2.22 Establish an overlay district in the designated urban renewal area, generally between S. 140 42 Avenue South, S. 146 Street and 37 Avenue South, that may allow increased building heights, reduced residential parking requirements, and other alternative development standards, subject to specific criteria, in order to encourage well designed, compact, transit oriented and pedestrian friendly redevelopment to activate the community along Tukwila International Boulevard." Rf 3 04/22/2009 H: \COMP PLAN 2008- 2009 \L08 -081& 82 T.O.D. Overlay.Tuk.Intl.Blvd\TOD-TIB-- CPA Appli can on #3 rev.4. 1 9.09. doc The intent of the proposed Urban Renewal Overlay District is to create a more vibrant neighborhood with neighborhood- oriented services and retail, redevelopment of distressed properties, more pedestrian friendly site design with high quality materials and attractive design. The overlay district is intended to be a specific tool to help implement the priorities of the Tukwila International Boulevard Plan, and is consistent with the desired direction of redevelopment projects in the area. The specific development standards such as reduced parking requirement, higher height limit, greater number of dwelling units make the economics of compact, mixed -use development, such as the Tukwila Village project, more feasible. Specific qualification criteria ensure that public interests are served and high quality amenities are provided. The Urban Renewal Overlay District's specific proposed development standards are described in the accompanying Zoning Code amendment (File #L08 -082). (2) A statement of the anticipated impacts of the chance. including the eeoaraphic area affected and the issues presented by the proposed change The proposed overlay district generally lies in the Tukwila International Boulevard Urban Renewal Area between S. 140 Street, 37 Avenue South, S. 146 and 42 Avenue S. The LDR -zoned properties on the west side of 42 Avenue South between S. 146 and S. 144 shall be excluded from the overlay since recent redevelopment and the presence of wetlands make them unsuited for higher intensity development. The LDR -zoned property north of S 144 shall be designated a Commercial Redevelopment Area and if redeveloped as part of a project in the overlay district, would be permitted to apply the uses and standards of the adjacent commercial district (18.60.060). New development is likely to be the primary impact of the proposed change. There has been little new development in this district for several decades. Vacant lots and underutilized parcels such as auto sales lots would be likely to redevelop to mixed -use buildings with residential units above ground -floor commercial. Some older apartments may be replaced with new mixed use structures that include residential units above commercial uses. The most visible impact would be taller buildings in the NCC zone (the current maximum height of 45 feet would increase to 65 feet.) This would be mitigated with the required stepping back of buildings adjacent to residential units. Because the eligibility criteria include mechanisms to prohibit tenant parking in the neighborhoods, the reduced parking requirement will not have a visible impact in the neighborhood, although it makes the project economics more viable. Enclosed structures would be required for 75% of residential parking. With less parking provided and a requirement for shared car parking (ZipCar), there could be fewer automobiles, and a greater focus on transit use. Requirements for pedestrian- friendly features should result in better design and added pedestrian activity. Rf 4 04/22/2009 H: \COMP PLAN 2008- 2009 \L08 -081& 82 T.O.D. Overlay.Tuk.Intl.Blvd\TOD -TIB CPA- Application #3.rev.4. l 9.09.doc (3) An explanation of why the current comprehensive elan or development regulations are deficient or should not continue in effect The current Comprehensive Plan and Tukwila International Boulevard Redevelopment Plan make redevelopment along Tukwila International Boulevard a priority. The proposed overlay district implements alternative development regulations for the Urban Renewal Area, which has been a long -time focal point for redevelopment and includes the Tukwila Village project. The Urban Renewal Overlay District's development standards are intended to address deficiencies in current development standards in order to spur redevelopment in a compact, transit friendly pattern that will encourage pedestrian activity and enliven the street area. The current multi- family and mixed -use development regulations that set maximum building height and minimum parking requirements assume significant reliance on automobiles. These development standards are less applicable for neighborhoods, such as the area along Tukwila International Boulevard, with good transit availability, services and amenities within walking distance, and pedestrian activity. In this neighborhood people can walk to a grocery store and drug store for daily necessities, and can also access a park, library, schools, and restaurants without requiring a car. Residents can walk to a bus line that provides service to downtown Seattle, Tukwila's transit station in the urban center, and other destinations. In 2009, Sound Transit's light rail station will open at S. 154 Street, providing additional service to downtown Seattle, the SeaTac Airport, and other destinations. As the neighborhood continues to improve in its appearance and amenities, it will become more desirable for compact development and transit oriented living. Tukwila's current multi family parking standards are deficient and problematic for some multi family residential development because the costs of providing the number of required parking spaces per unit makes the economics of redevelopment and new development very difficult. Current city -wide development standards stipulate two parking spaces per dwelling unit up to three bedrooms. A studio or one bedroom unit requires two parking spaces as well, although most people who live in studios that are in pedestrian and transit friendly neighborhoods only have one car. Providing one parking space in structured parking can range from $20,000 to $30,000 per space, and add 10% to 20% to the total cost of multi family residential development. An overlay district that allows additional dwelling units and building heights subject to specific criteria is needed to help defray the costs of the desired structured parking and make the new development workable financially. (4) A statement of how the proposed amendment complies with and promotes the goals and specific reauirements of the Growth Management Act Among its objectives, the Growth Management Act attempts to encourage growth and development in urban areas in order to preserve farm, rural and resource lands within Rf 5 04/22/2009 H: \COMP PLAN 2008 2009 \L08 -081& 82 T.O.D. Overlay.Tuk.Intl.Blvd\TOD -TIB CPA- Application #3.rev.4.19.09.doc close proximity to these urban lands. By encouraging compact urban areas, public facility costs are more efficiently supported by higher densities and tax dollars. Specific goals are as follows: RCW 36.70A.020 Planning Goals- (1) Urban Growth. Encourage growth in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner... (4)Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock... (5) Economic Development. Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizens of this state, especially for unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, promote the retention and expansion of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses, recognize regional differences impacting economic development opportunities, and encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the state's natural resources, public services, and public facilities... (10) Environment. Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including air and water quality, and the availability of water. (5) A statement of how the proposed amendment complies with applicable Countywide planning policies According to applicable Countywide Planning Policy, infill development should be in keeping with existing development patterns. Compact development is encouraged. LU -69 All jurisdictions shall develop neighborhood planning and design processes to encourage infill development and enhance the existing community character and mix of uses (6) A statement of what chances, if anv. would be reauired in functional plans (i.e. the Citv's water. sewer. storm water. or shoreline plans) if the proposed amendment is adopted The proposed overlay district would not require the City to change any functional plans at this time. As development occurs, the City would make the same sorts of improvements to transportation, water, sewer, and stomi water infrastructure that it would make for any development. Rf 6 04/22/2009 H: \COMP PLAN 2008-2009\L08-081& 82 T.O.D. Overlay.Tuk.Intl.Blvd\TOD-TIB-- CPA -Appl ication #3 .rev .4.19.09. d oc (7) A statement of what capital improvements, if any, would be needed to support the proposed change. and how the proposed change would affect the capital facilities plans of the city The proposed overlay district would not require the City to make capital improvements at this time. As development occurs the City would make the same sorts of improvements to capital facilities that it would make for any development. (8) A statement of what other changes, if any, are required in other City codes, plans or regulations to implement the change. Implementing the proposed overlay district would not require changes in other City codes, plans or regulations. Rf 7 04/22/2009 H: \COMP PLAN 2008-2009\L08-081& 82 T.O.D. Overlay.Tuk.Intl.Blvd\TOD-TIB- CPA -Appl icati on #3 .rev.4.19.09. d oc Planner: Application Complete (Date: 31251 01) Application Incomplete (Date: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Tukwila International Boulevard Transit Oriented Development Overlay Zone LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. All properties within 500 feet of Tukwila International Boulevard between South 140th Street and South 160th Street. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). List to be provided at later time due to extent of area under consideration_ DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR The individual who: has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Address: Phone: E -mail: Signature: Derek Speck 6200 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila, 206-433--1832 dspec ci tukwila.wa. P' zing Forms Applications \ZoneChng- 6 -06.doc CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: t ukplan @ci. tkwila, wa. us RSCEIVED i."!;i74 OP' UKWR t E; 7 9: I a ZONING CODE 98188 ATTACHMENT J WA 98188 FAX: 206 433 -7191 Date: /2/, 4 r AMENDMENTS FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits PI r s Type: P -ZCA I File Number: Iwo `3 0 (C.e Z Project File Number: 1 Other File Numbers: j i3 —0 rw pJ December 4, 20D6 A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: HDR NCC r RC Proposed: Same designations except with addition of an overlay zone. B. ZONING DESIGNATION: Existing: Proposed: C. LAND USE(S): Existing: Hotels /motels, retail, apartments, auto sales, religious Proposed: Same uses except encourages mixed -use with residential over commercial. P: Planning Forms Applications \ZoneChng- 6- 06.doC HDR, NCC, RC Same designations except with addition of an overlay zone. (for proposed changes in land use designations or rezones) secovim cmf orToymnA OK, 2 December 4, 2006 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the c(i i nt owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at _.0 —0- a. R r 144th for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the Loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. EXECUTED at Tukwila Print Name (1) Owner Representative Address Phone Number Signature lanning Forms Applications \ZoneChng- 6- 06.doc CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E mail: tukplan ©ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ss (city), WA (state), on Derek Speck R r' P 11111 3i! December 26 2008 6200 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila, WA 206 -43,3-1832 On this day personally appeared before me 0 a r e_ 5 'mac_ L executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that(hashe signed the same a and purposes mentioned therein. v SUBSCRIBED ANDQ{AI ,'�'P BEFORE ME ON THIS °2- DAY OF C.-G k.-v\.-\O 20 0 S e-‘1 S ky s NOTARY PUBLIC in and for t e ate of W hington o �p 5 A.1\ l r ,,,t, ,C) Vim. �U 1 UB'- O_/. h1 1l {t 11 1 10 w ,,'a on to me known to be the individual who er voluntary act and deed for the uses 3 2 tom residing at My Commission expires December 4, 2006 Summary Tukwila International Boulevard Urban Renewal Area/Transit- Oriented Development Overlay District Rezone This application proposes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code to create an overlay district for commercial, commercial redevelopment area and multi- family zoned properties within the Urban Renewal Area along Tukwila International Boulevard. The Urban Renewal Area was designated in the January, 2000 "Tukwila International Boulevard Plan— Revitalization and Urban Renewal" as part of the redevelopment planning process. Chapter 35.81 RCW required the designation of an Urban Renewal Area and plan for City partnership in private development. The proposed overlay district generally lies between S. 140th Street, 37 Avenue South, S. 146 and 42 Avenue S. The LDR -zoned properties on the west side of 42 Avenue South between S. 146 and S. 144 will be excluded from the overlay since recent redevelopment and the presence of wetlands make them unsuited for higher intensity development. The LDR -zoned property north of S 144 will be designated a Commercial Redevelopment Area and, if redeveloped as part of a project in the overlay district, would be permitted to apply the uses and standards of the adjacent commercial district (TMC 18.60.060). The intent of the overlay district is to encourage the redevelopment of distressed areas (i.e. the Urban Renewal area on Tukwila International Boulevard) with a compact, transit oriented development pattern including neighborhood serving services and retail, more pedestrian friendly site design, high quality materials and attractive projects. The proposed overlay district would leave the existing zoning in place and would not change development standards for the underlying zones including Medium Density Residential (MDR), High Density Residential (HDR), and Neighborhood Commercial Center (NCC). However, the overlay would provide some additional alternative development standards that could be applied to developments within the overlay district upon request of the property owner and if the developments meet certain qualifying criteria. The basic alternative development standards include: 1) allowing building heights of up to 65 feet; 2) reducing the required parking spaces for multi family development; 3) determining the maximum number of dwelling units by the building envelope; and 4) allowing live /work space on the ground floor of the Neighborhood Commercial Center zone. Rf 1 04/22/2009 H: \COMP PLAN 2008- 2009 \L08 -081& 82 T.O.D. Overlay.Tuk.Intl.Blvd\TOD-TIB-- Zoning Amendment Application Criteria 43b .doc Proposed Development Standards (1) Allow building heights up to 65 feet in the Urban Renewal Area. The existing Neighborhood Commercial Center (NCC) setback standards shall be followed per TMC 18.22.080. (2) Allow multi family parking standards to be one parking space per each dwelling unit that contains up to one bedroom plus 0.5 spaces for every bedroom in excess of one bedroom in a dwelling unit. (3) Allow the maximum number of dwelling units to be determined by the building envelope thus eliminating a specific limit on the number of residential dwelling units. Additionally, require units to contain at least 500 square feet of interior floor space and allow no more than 50% of the dwelling units to be studios. (4) Allow live /work space on the ground floor to meet the NCC requirement for ground floor retail or office space if the live /work space is built to commercial building code standards with a typical retail store front appearance. (5) Allow ground floor residential uses in the NCC zone in buildings or portions of buildings that do not front on an arterial. Qualification Criteria The Urban Renewal Overlay District's proposed development standards would apply if the owner /developer requests, and if all the following criteria are met: (1) At least 100 feet of the development's perimeter fronts on Tukwila International B oulevard (2) At least 75% of required residential parking is provided in an enclosed structure (garage or podium). The structure must be screened from view from public rights of way. (3) The ground floor along Tukwila International Boulevard must be active uses except for the width of the garage access. (4) Residential and commercial tenant leases must prohibit parking on neighborhood streets. (5) Residential development must encourage tenants to use a car sharing program and make one space available at no charge to a car sharing program (if available) for every 50 spaces on site. (6) Development must provide amenities to enable a high quality pedestrian experience (retail windows, pedestrian scale design along sidewalks, wide Rf 2 04/23/2009 H: \COMP PLAN 2008 2009 \L08 -081& 82 T.O.D. Overlay.Tuk.Intl.Blvd\TOD-TIB-- Zoning Amendment Application Criteria #3b .doc sidewalks, pedestrian access through site, benches, art, landscaping and lighting, quality of materials, etc.) Zoning Amendment Criteria (TMC 18.84.030) Demonstrate how each of the following circumstances justifies a rezone of your property or a change in the existing zoning code. Each deteimination granting a rezone shall be supported by written findings and conclusions showing specifically wherein all of the following conditions exist: (1) That the proposed amendment to the zoning, man is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive elan Of four objectives, the Comprehensive Plan's #2 priority objective is the following: To redevelop and reinvigorate the Pacific Highway corridor. Goal 8.2 Pacific Highway Corridor Goal is the following: A Pacific Highway corridor that is an attractive, safe and profitable place to live, do business, shop and work, and is a positive reflection of the City as a whole and of the surrounding residential and business community. Pacific Highway Corridor policies 8.2.1 through 8.2.21 describe the means to achieve the Pacific Highway Corridor goal (above) and to support positive redevelopment for the Tukwila International Boulevard corridor (renamed from Pacific Highway in 1999) and surrounding area. As indicated above, the second highest priority for the City of Tukwila is the redevelopment of the Pacific Highway Corridor. The goal for Tukwila International Boulevard is a Pacific Highway corridor that is an attractive, safe and profitable place to live, do business, shop and work, and is a positive reflection of the City as a whole and of the surrounding residential and business community." Tukwila International Boulevard with attractive design, transit, activities, and amenities, would encourage people to walk and interact, improve safety with more "eyes on the street and become a vibrant neighborhood. The proposed overlay district will encourage redevelopment of underutilized properties that are included in the designated Urban Renewal Area, and would provide the maximum opportunity for private enterprise that is consistent with City of Tukwila goals and public needs. This will enhance the general desirability of the area with high quality, compact and transit oriented development. (2) That the Proposed amendment to the zoning map is consistent with the scope and purpose of this title and the description and purpose of the zone classification applied for The proposed Urban Renewal Overlay would retain and be consistent with the existing High Density Residential (HDR), Neighborhood Commercial Center (NCC) Rf 3 04/23/2009 H: \COMP PLAN 2008- 2009 \L08 -081& 82 T.O.D. Overlay.Tuk.Intl.Blvd\TOD-TIB-- Zoning Amendment Application Criteria #3b .doc and Regional Commercial (RC). The proposed amendment would create an overlay district that would supplement the current underlying zoning through new development standards that would be applicable only if specific criteria, such as providing covered parking and high quality pedestrian amenities, were met. (3) There are changed conditions since the previous zoning became effective to warrant the proposed amendment to the zoning man Changed conditions warrant the proposed amendment to the zoning map. These include: (a) A new light rail station will open in 2009 providing service to downtown Seattle, the SeaTac Airport, and other locations. (b) Bus rapid transit (BRT) will start in 2010 between Federal Way and the light rail station (c) Metro is proposing additional bus service to the light rail station, including more service along Tukwila International Boulevard between South 144 and the light rail station. (d) There is a nationwide increase in demand by employees and residents to be able to live and work in pedestrian friendly, transit oriented neighborhoods. (e) The City is negotiating with a developer for creation of Tukwila Village at the intersection of South 144 and Tukwila International Boulevard. All of the developers who competed for this project expressed the importance of having the ability to build to 65 feet and meet lower parking standards in order to ensure economic viability for the project. (4)The proposed amendment to the zoning map will be in the interest and furtherance of the public health. safety, comfort. convenience. and Reneral welfare, and will not be iniurious to other properties in the vicinity in which the subiect property is located. The proposed overlay district will encourage new development and revitalization of underutilized properties to improve the appearance, safety, and desirability of the neighborhood along Tukwila International Boulevard. This redevelopment will benefit all properties in the vicinity. The overlay leaves in place many of the existing development standards that protect neighboring properties, such as the proportional setbacks. Alternative development regulations in the proposed overlay district would lessen potential negative impacts on neighboring properties by requiring that residential and commercial tenant leases prohibit parking in the neighborhoods, and by providing structured parking for new development. Pedestrian amenities would be required, and would benefit the neighborhood by encouraging walking and a more positive neighborhood experience. Rf 4 04/23/2009 H: \COMP PLAN 2008 2009 \L08 -081& 82 T.O.D. Overlay.Tuk.Intl.Blvd\TOD-TIB-- Zoning Amendment Application Criteria #3b .doc MEM MEM MDR HMI I J Zoning Lines RC Tukwila Village Project I I__ I m= HDR r Commercial Redevelopment Areas Proposed Commercial Redevelopment Area Proposed Transit Oriented Development Overlay District tiCC S14 St MDR _i gi-:- 4 NCC I p. R 1../ a _4 /S 146 St 4 E a .;st-DOETAFJ rsH IL,COR 1 250 feel L08-081 Comprehensive Plan Amendment- Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay L08-082 Rezone/Overlay District-Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay C NU.\ C )RY Si )NSOR SP( )NS )R'S Sl' \I,\L \RY RI ',V fl'AVI?1D BY MTG. DATE 05/11/09 MTG. DATE 05/11/09 Discussion tlltg Date 05/11/09 Council Mayor U Cow Mtg. Utilities Cmte DATE: 04/27/09 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. C( )NIMI"1"1'1 Ex Pi NID1"1'URI? Ri uI1U D $48,000 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Nleetin� Date Prepared by 1 !Mayor' review I Councilrqiew 05/11/09 RB 1 f I 05/18/09 RB 1 Motion Resolution it Ltg Date 05/18/09 Mtg Date Adm Svcs Fund Source: MAYOR'S OFFICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Comments: Initials ITEM INFORMATION ORIGINAL AGENDA D,' 1'1?: MAY 11, 2009 HEM Contract amendment Commercial Development Solutions CA &P Cmte Arts Comm. Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing n Other illtg Date bitg Date DCD I Finance I I Fire Legal P &R U Police I I PIV n F &S Cmte Parks Comm. COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE AMOUNT BUDGETED $48,000 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION A fig Date ATTACHMENTS Informational memorandum dated 04/06/09 Contract Amendment Minutes from the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting of 4/27/09 ITEM No. 4 C illtg Date The contract with Commercial Development Solutions will expire on June 30, 2009. The City entered into the contract for project management for the Tukwila South project. The Council is being asked to extend the contract to December 31, 2009. n Transportation Cmte n Planning Comm. APPROPRIATION REQUIRED TO: ISSUE: BACKGROUND City of Tukwila INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM Mayor Haggerton Community Affairs and Parks Committee Jim Haggerton, Mayor FROM: Rhonda Berry, City Administrator DATE: April 6, 2009 SUBJECT: Contract Amendment for Commercial Development Solutions (CDS) <Lisa Verner> Professional Services Contract with Commercial Development Solutions (CDS) will expire on June 30, 2009. The City entered into a contract with Lisa Verner in 2006 to serve as Project Manager for the Tukwila South project. Though we now have agreement on "deal points," staff continues to finalize work on getting a Development Agreement ready for Council approval. Once the Development Agreement is approved, additional assistance will be needed to coordinate the annexation and other tasks related to the project. Additionally, it is helpful to have one focal person to serve a liaison role with the property owner. It is anticipated that approval of the Development Agreement can be accomplished within the first half of 2009, and annexation can be accomplished within the second half of 2009. DISCUSSION CDS was hired because there was no staff person available to dedicate solely to the Tukwila South project. The comprehensive institutional knowledge of all aspects of the project resides with Lisa Verner. Transferring these responsibilities to someone else at this point would be extremely unproductive and would probably prolong the amount of time necessary to accomplish tasks critical to beginning construction of the Southcenter Parkway extension. RECOMMENDATION The Council is being asked to approve the contract amendment and consider this item at the May 11, 2009 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent May 18, 2009 Regular Meeting. ATTACHMENT Contract Amendment Commercial Development Solutions ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Cleric Date Approved by City Council CITY OF TUKWILA CONTRACT FOR SERVICES Amendment to #06- 059(efD' That portion of Contract No. AG06- 059(c) between the City of Tukwila and Commercial Development Solutions is amended as follows: Under Section 2, Compensation and Method of Payment: Total amount to be paid shall not exceed $3 (an addition of $48,000 to the previous contract amount of $151,000199,000). Under Section 4, Duration of Agreement: This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing January 1, 2009 and ending June 30, 2009December 31, 2009 unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. All other provisions of the contract shall remain in full force and effect. Dated this day of 20082009. CONTRACTOR CITY OF TUKWILA Jim Haggerton, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney Community Affairs Parks Committee Minutes Aori127, 2009 Paae 2 C. Contract Amendment with Commercial Develop ment Solutions Administration is seeking full Council approval for a contract amendment with Commercial Development Solutions. A draft development agreement and annexation for the Tukwila South project are currently being reviewed at Council work sessions. In an effort to keep the continuity of work moving forward, Administration is requesting Council approval of a contract amendment that will extend the current Commercial Development Solutions contract through December 31, 2009, and add an additional amount of funding for contract services not to exceed $48,000. If the development agreement is approved and moves forward, several items will still require follow through and action. Administration recommends contract extension though the end of the year for continuity. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MAY 11 COW FOR DISCUSSION. D. 2009 1s Quarter Reports The Committee reviewed the status of program goals as outlined in the 2009 1s Quarter Report. INFORMATION ONLY. III. MISCELLANEOUS Meeting adjourned at 5:32 p.m. Next meeting: Monday, May 11, 2009- 5:00 p.m. Conference Room #3 Committee Chair Approval M�1 ite y KAM. Reviewed by E8. CAS M III -1I?R: C. \'1'I SPONSOR SP( )NSOR'S SI'MM Rl' RI :VII AVIA.I) 131' Discussion Motion n Resolution t1ltg Date 05/11/09 t11tg Date 05/18/09 Mtg Date II COW Mtg. Utilities Cmte DATE: RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Police Department Cc )MMITI J COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Lritialr [Meeting Date Prepared by 1 Mayor' review Council revieg2P 05/11/09 MV 1 ./4 05/18/09 MV 1 ITEM INFORMATION A( ;I:ND I'IEnt TrrlE King County Animal Control Option CA &P Cmte Arts Comm. ORIGINAL AGEND Di \T1?: MAY 11, 2009 Mtg Date Ordinance n Bid Award Council 1 I Ma I dm Svcs DCD 7 Finance Fire 1 1 Legal n P&R Police n PW A1tg Date n F &S Cmte Parks Comm. MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 4/20/09 (20) hour enhanced services agreement was not adopted II n Planning Comm. MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 5/11/09 Informational memorandum dated 5/6/09 Amendment to Interlocal Agreement (for 10 hours) in strike through format Interlocal Agreement with the City of SeaTac ITEM NO. Public Hearing Other Aitg Date Mtg Date Currently, King County Animal Control and the City have an interlocal agreement that calls for 12 hours of supplemental animal control services per week. An amendment to the Interlocal for twenty (20) hours of services per week was not approved by Council on April 20, 2009. King County has offered an agreement that would provide ten (10) hours of dedicated animal control services in lieu of the current agreement. Council is being asked to review the city's options and provide policy direction to staff. Transportation Cmte COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE E\PINDITURI? RI ,QU IRI?D AMOUNT B UDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $46,400 $76,000 $0 Fund Source: GENERAL FUND Comments: Expenditure is for 7 months in 2009 and entirety of 2010. TO: FROM: Mike Villa, Assistant Chief of Police DATE: May 06, 2009 SUBJECT: King County Animal Control Services ISSUE City of Tukwila INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM Mayor Haggerton Councilmembers The issue is the need for direction regarding supplemental animal control services in the City of Tukwila. BACKGROUND The City of Tukwila and King County entered into an Interlocal Agreement dated December 15, 1993 relating to the provision of animal control services within the City. In 1994 the Interlocal was amended. King County agreed to provide supplemental animal control service to average twelve (12) hours per week. In August of 2007 the City and King County amended the Interlocal Agreement from twelve hours per week to twenty (20) hours of dedicated animal services. King County was unable to provide the twenty hours of supplemental services during 2007 or 2008. Council revisited the issue during the April 13 and 20 council meetings and the twenty (20) hour amendment did not pass. The twelve (12) hour agreement, although not yet performed during 2009, is still in affect. King County has proposed an amendment for ten (10) hours of dedicated animal services under the same conditions as set forth under the twenty (20) hour Interlocal Agreement. DISCUSSION W1\2009 InfoMemos \AnimalControl_infomemo to council May 11.doc Jim Haggerton, Mayor The City of Tukwila has three options as follows: 1) Continue under the current Interlocal agreement, 2) sign the ten (10) hour amendment, or 3) discontinue the supplemental services agreement with King County Animal Services. If the City signs the new Interlocal Agreement, King County will provide one full time officer to work within SeaTac, King County licensing, and Tukwila. The City of Tukwila will receive a dedicated ten (10) hours of services per week. INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 The dedicated officer shall have a special emphasis on, but not limited to, off -leash violations, barking dog complaints, potentially dangerous dogs, and provide special presentations at community events such as the Backyard Wildlife Habitat Fair and Tukwila Days. The county fees include the officer's base hourly rate (including benefits) and the use of the King County animal transport vehicle. The fees for the vehicle per year are $3,240. The total costs are not to exceed $30,000 per year under this amendment. The City budgeted $38,000 per year for 2009/2010. RECOMMENDATION The Council is being asked to consider this issue at the May 11, 2009 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent May 18, 2009 Regular Meeting. ATTACHMENTS Amendment to Interlocal Services Agreement with King County in strike through format Interlocal Services Agreement with the City of SeaTac W112009 InfoMemoslAnimalControl _infomemo to council May 11.doc INTERLOCAL SERVICES AGREEMENT AMENDMENT Between the City of Tukwila and King County Regarding Animal Services and Programs This is an Amendment to the standing Interlocal Agreement between the City of Tukwila and King County. The Amendment is for supplemental animal control services between the City of Tukwila, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "City and King County, a home -rule charter county, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "County WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila (City) and King County (County) entered into an Interlocal Agreement dated December 15, 1993 "the Interlocal Agreement relating to the provision of animal control services within the City; and WHEREAS, the City and County wish to amend the Interlocal Agreement to enable the County to continue to provide the City Tukwila with additional animal control services under an enhanced services program; NOW, in consideration of mutual covenants, the City and County hereby agree to amend the Interlocal Agreement by supplementing the Interlocal Agreement with the following provisions contained in each section: Section 1. Service Obligation A. The County shall provide supplemental animal control services in the form of an additional animal control officer dedicated to the City for an additional ten (10) hours per week. This additional ten (10) hours of services per week may be divided into more than one shift /day. This dedicated officer shall have a special emphasis on, but not limited to, off -leash violations, barking dog complaints, potentially dangerous dogs, and to provide special presentations at community events such as the Backyard Wildlife Habitat Fair and Tukwila Days. B. The scheduling of these additional service days will be determined by mutual agreement of the contract administrators of this supplemental service; however, days worked will routinely fall upon Wednesday, Thursday, Friday or Saturday. C. The additional animal control officer will be stationed within the City limits to respond to specific calls for service, perfoiiii routine patrols, communicate with City officials, and handle other related tasks as agreed to by the contract administrators of this supplemental service. D. The additional animal control officer will issue written warnings and citations at the discretion of the contract administrators of this supplemental service. E. The additional animal control officer will appear in court on the City's behalf when necessary. Amendment Interlocal Agreement Between City of SeaTac and King County Regarding Animal Services Page 1 of 3 F. The County shall provide the City with a general monthly calendar of scheduled service in Tukwila, and a monthly report of the types of services offered and performed. G. The County shall submit to the City an invoice and billing voucher at the end of each quarter. During the 4 quarter of 2007, a final invoice shall be submitted to the City no later than December 15, 2007. H. The City may provide the additional animal control officer with a City vehicle to perform the supplemental animal control services or mako a- additional animal control officer to use. the City may contract with the County to provide a vehicle for the additional animal control officer at additional expense to the City. 2009 Base Hourly Rate for 20 hours per $56.72 week 2009 Base Hourly Rate for 25 hours per $51.83 week 2009 Base Hourly Rate for 30 hours per $50.63 week 2009 Overtime Hourly Rate $42.99 2009 Holiday Hourly Rate $56.52 Section 2. Compensation. In consideration for the supplemental services provided by the County as set forth herein, the City promises to pay the County for the hours of animal control officer work at the hourly rate of $30.39 (overtime rate is $57,50; holiday rate is $76.78 plus an additional eight hours of pay at $3 0.39). Not to exceed $35,000 per year. as set forth below: A. Hourly Rates for Additional Animal Control Officer When Total Hours Worked Equal 40 Hours Per Week (Full- Time): The parties agree and anticipate that the City will share the cost of the additional animal control officer with another city(s) or agency(s) so that the additional animal control officer's work schedule will total at least forty (40) hours per week or full time status. The hourly rate for the additional animal control officer at full -time use (40 hours per week) by either Tukwila solely or in conjunction with other city(s) or agency(s) shall be as follows: 2009 Base Hourly Rate $46.75 2009 Overtime Hourly Rate $42.99 2009 Holiday Hourly Rate $56.52 B. Hourly Rates for Additional Animal Control Officer When Total Hours Worked Equal Less than 40 Hours Per Week (Less than Full Time): In the event another city or cities no longer share the cost of the additional animal control officer with Tukwila and thereby causes the additional animal control officer's work schedule to be less than forty (40) hours per week or less than full time status, then the rates for enhanced service to Tukwila will increase. The hourly rates for the additional animal control officer at less than full -time usage are as follows: Amendment Interlocal Agreement Between City of SeaTac and King County Regarding Animal Services Page 2of 3 C. The overtime rates are lower than the base rates because many program costs other than salary are captured in the base rate and are therefore not billed in the overtime rate. D. In addition to the cost of the additional animal control officer as set forth above, the City shall pay the County a monthly rate for the use of the County's animal control vehicles. The monthly rate for use of the animal control vehicle shall be proportionate to the City's usage of the vehicle for enhanced services as set forth in this Amendment. The full 2009 monthly rate for use of the animal transport truck is $1,080; and the full 2009 monthly rate for use of the standard vehicle is $285. At ten (10) hours per week the monthly rate is $270 for the animal transport truck. E. The total annual compensation amount to be paid under this Agreement for the Animal Control Officer and vehicle shall not exceed the total of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) per year. Section 3. Contract Administrators. For purposes of these supplemental services, the contract administrators shall be the City Administrator or a designee and the King County Animal Care and Control Manager or designee. Section 4. Other Portions of the Agreement Unaffected. Except as specifically stated herein, all other portions of the Interlocal Agreement shall remain in place and are unaffected by this Amendment. Further, except as specifically stated herein, all portions of the Interlocal Agreement shall apply to the sections of this Amendment. Section 5. Previous Amendments. All previous amendments to the Interlocal Agreement for enhanced or supplemental animal control services are teiiiiinated. Section 6. Discontinuation of Supplemental Services. The County or City may discontinue the provision of supplemental services authorized by this agreement with or without cause upon providing thirty -days written notice. Jim Haggerton Mayor Section 7. Effective Date. This Amendment shall be effective upon the date last signed below. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement. CITY OF TUKWILA KING COUNTY Date Ron Sims Date King County Executive Approved as to foam: Approved as to form: City Attorney Date Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Date Amendment Interlocal Agreement Between City of SeaTac and King County Regarding Animal Services Page 3of 3 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, THE CITY OF SEATAC, AND KING COUNTY REGARDING ENHANCED ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Tukwila, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington; and the City of SeaTac, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington; and King County, a home rule charter county and political subdivision of the State of Washington, for the purposes of cooperation and coordination regarding enhanced animal control services provided by King County within the jurisdictions of Tukwila and SeaTac. WHEREAS, each of the parties hereto has an interest in responsive and effective animal control services; and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila and the City of SeaTac both contract with King County for standard animal control services and enhanced (additional) animal control services; and WHEREAS, in the event of an animal- related incident that has the potential for significant injury to a citizen or animal, all parties desire the quickest and most effective response from the King County enhanced services animal control officer; and WHEREAS, the city boundaries of Tukwila and SeaTac are directly adjacent and their communities are closely aligned; and WHEREAS, all parties to this Agreement have detennined that it is in the best interests of all parties to set forth guidelines for providing priority animal control response and mutual aid to each city in the case of an animal related incident with the potential for significant injury to a citizen or animal; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. PURPOSE. The stated purpose of the Interlocal Agreement is to provide priority response and mutual aid to the cities for additional /enhanced animal control services in the event of an emergency animal control incident. Section 2. DEFINITION. For the purpose of this Agreement, an emergency animal control incident shall mean an animal related incident with the potential for significant injury to a citizen or animal. Additional /enhanced services Animal Control Officer references the King County Animal Control Officer that shall provide supplemental animal control services in the form of additional hours of service dedicated to the respective City under the provisions of an Amendment to the Interlocal Services Agreement. Section 3. REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE. The Police Chief or his /her designee may request that the additional /enhanced services Animal Control Officer terminate normal service in the other parties' jurisdiction and respond immediately if confronted with an animal related incident with the potential for significant injury to a citizen or animal. Interlocal Agreement Between the City of Tukwila, City of SeaTac and King County Regarding Enhanced Animal Control Services Page 1 of 2 Section 4. COMPENSATION. The City of Tukwila and the City of SeaTac agree that if either city invokes the mutual aid agreement as set forth herein by requesting assistance and taking the additional /enhanced services Animal Control Officer away from contracted service in the other City's jurisdiction, then the requesting City will relinquish an amount of supplemental or enhanced animal control service time to the other city equal to the amount of service time spent on the emergency call or mutual aid request. This reimbursement of additional /enhanced service time shall occur as soon as practical. Section 5. TERMINATION. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until tetntinated by any party. A party desiring to terminate this Agreement shall serve written notice upon all other parties of its intention to terminate this Agreement. Such notice shall be served not less than thirty (30) calendar days prior to the termination date set forth in said written notice. Said written notice shall automatically terminate this Agreement on the date specified therein unless rescinded prior in writing. Section 6. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Agreement shall be effective upon the date last signed below. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement. CITY OF SEATAC KING COUNTY Craig Ward City Manager Approved as to form: City Attorney CITY OF TUKWILA Jim Haggerton Mayor Approved as to foiin: Date Date Date City Attorney Date Ron Sims Date King County Executive Approved as to form: Prosecuting Attorney Date Interlocal Agreement Between the City of Tukwila, City of SeaTac and King County Regarding Enhanced Animal Control Services Page 2 of 2 Ilth (Monday) 12th (Tuesday) 13th (Wednesday) 5' Community Utilities Cmte, Affairs 5:00 PM Parks Cmte, (CR #1) 5:00 PM (CR #3) City Council Committee of the Whole Mtg., 7:00 PM (Council Chambers) City Council Special Mtg. (Work Session on Tukwila South project) 5:30 to 8:00 PM (Council Chambers) Tukwila International Boulevard Action Cmte, 7:00 PM (Community Center) 18th (Monday) 19th (Tuesday) 20th (Wednesday) Transportation 5 Finance t Parks Cmte, Safety Cmte, Commission, 5:00 PM 5:00 PM 5:30 PM (CR #1) (CR #3) (Conununtty TENTATIVE Center) City Council Regular Mtg., 7:00 PM (Council Chambers) City Council Special Mtg. (Work Session on Tukwila South project) 5:30 to 8:00 PM (Council Chambers) Upcoming Meetings Events MAY 2009 Rock `n' Roll Seattle Marathon Community Open House 6:30 to 8:30 PM Tukwila Community Center The marathon on Saturday, June 27, will start in Tukwila! Come sign up as a volunteer or to learn about road closure information, Marathon information at www.rnrseatfle.com City Council Special Mtg. (Work Session on Tukwila South project) 5:30 to 8:00 PM (Council Chambers) 14th (Thursday) Police Department's Tip -a -Cop Fundraiser for Special Olympics 5:00 9:00 PM at Claim Jumper (5901 S. 180th St Y Planning Commission (Work Session on Tukwila Urban Center Plan), 6:00 PM (Council Chambers) 2Ist (Thursday) Crime Hot Spots Task Force Mtg., 10:00 AM (CR #5) Domestic Violence Task Force, 12:00 NOON (Human Svcs. office) Planning Commission (Work Session on Tukwila Urban Center Plan), 6:00 PM (Council Chambers) Tukwila Historical Society, 7:00 PM (Bergquisl House, 14455 58th Ave S) Library Advisory Board, 7:00 PM (Foster Library) NOTE: MEETMG TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY THIS MONTH. 15th (Friday) Tukwila Police Department's National Police Officers Memorial Day Ceremony POLICE,1 9:00 AM Tukwila City Hall (at the flagpole) 16th (Saturday) Residential Recycling Collection Event 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM Tukwila Village site at the corner ofS 144th St. 41st Ave. S. (one block west of Foster High School) See "Headlines" at www.ci.tukwila. wa.us for additional information. Kids Appreciation Day Festival 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM Tukwila Community Center FREE! Fun for the whole family. Sunday, May 17 Rainier Symphony performance (with the Northwest University Chorale) 3:00 PM Foster Performing Arts Center For more information call 206 -781 -5618 or visit www.rainier symphony. org 22nd (Friday) 23rd (Saturday) Community Affairs Parks Committee: 2nd 4th Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room #3. Agenda item for 5/11/09 meeting: Housekeeping code amendments. Utilities Committee: 2nd 4th Tues., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room #1. Agenda items for 5/12/09 meeting (A) tw telecom fralchrse agreement amendment. (B) 2009 1st quarter report MONTH May 4 25th Memorial Day (City offices closed) June Tentative Agenda Schedule 29 Fifth Monday of the month—no Council meeting scheduled 3 Independence Day (observed) (City offices closed) 1 MEETING 1- MEETING 2 REGULAR C.O.W. Public Hearing: Tukwila South street vacation ordinances Unfinished Business: Tukwila South street vacation ordinances Tukwila South surplus property resolution Ordinance authorizing Mayor to enter into Tukwila South development agreement Authorize the Mayor to sign the CERB contract Tukwila South land use ordinances 11 See agenda packet cover sheet for this week's agenda (May 11, 2009 Committee of the Whole Meeting) 8 Public Hearing: Tukwila South annexation July 6 13 20 Public Hearing: Shoreline Master Program update and environmental review (continued from April 20, 2009) MEETING 3 MEETING 4 REGULAR C.O.W. 18 26 (Tuesday) Proclamation /Appt.: Proclamation designating May 17- 23 as National Public Works Week Appointment to Community- Oriented Policing Citizens' Advisory Board Public Hearing: Ordinance authorizing the Mayor to enter into a development agreement with La Pianta, LLC, for the project known as Tukwila South Unfinished Business: Minor Home Repair Program Comprehensive Plan amendment (public meeting fonnat) Contract amendment with Commercial Development Solutions 15 Special Presentation: Update on the Seattle Southside Business Attraction Program (Allison Clark, Economic Development Specialist, Highline Community College) Public Hearing: Tukwila South land use ordinances Special Issues: Tukwila South land use ordinances 22 Special Presentation: YMCA presentation (Claudia Tanis, Executive Director, and Amy White, Financial Development Director) COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING TO BE FOLLOWED BY A SPECIAL MEETING 27