Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit D2000-009 - COSTCO - GAS STATION ADDITIONINSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila,' WA 98188 PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 Project: (-\11- Type of Inspection: Address: i 'S l Ott.{% t..\/, {1 / ' i? . Date calle i �' 03 OS 0. -N,r t,--1 t "t:''L•.) 1 Special instructions: Date wanted: /7 1,0. a.m. p.m. Requester: Phone: 204,, - 4 L1e- 4/13 f,:(i ti ,..• -..,.. Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: L•at,A,ISI. t/y0✓ ,s ..,eiGreA 6. `tE'Ltd!f.. OS 0. -N,r t,--1 t "t:''L•.) 1 Inspector: 4,/e14, •i Dater / n $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: i_ ::i. �. ,�. '; ..sx,..a'+`ic.l,q.,r „'t 'w ;c'.::k..s < i,;,,! c�. z.;` ucei�xc. 5s� .n'3S�nisr's'a.�n�Gliadir4'�'u� �k'au'.�r• . . ,'r acdAiext ' :. = xtzAita. ” ". rri 7yn ,.::"tee s'xE Fi SCsw 454, vde %LF i.: ,t 11,14' , COMMENTS: - TO-4 . i i'....ili. . 5- DO' .,. • t 0 . i -5 . AAA. — • VICA-t4 � tUc.tfa. L- '-1,1 o --, I c:_'.,?,eE 4 °- ✓ - / /0 (3 u:.'( ).Qdz l a 54 rl E -C.•n i>1 -7 1 0141'1 01 - 11-4 1 S 4,A-1/(42 ( OVA °Vitt i-J. 3 .. ,. -- ,L.t_(. vr.:::�c__ / Phone: fo — ei 1 1 'y — 5 13 cn._.Z. Project: ( "› T7..c) (7i'i Vs tt,t�_Q, , Type of Inspection: y i _ OA.. -:i :.I /i , el V . Address: - .11 . . 1 : : y,9'^N 1 � ;f: Date called: I 6 — 2 — .2 z3 Special instructions: Date wanted: • (,+-- .", --..2 "1..:) C.E' p.m. Requester: 6t lice\ Phone: fo — ei 1 1 'y — 5 13 cn._.Z. INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. t :) PERMIT NO. (206)431 -3670 $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Corrections required prior to„approval. Inspector: Date: Receipt No: Date: Z Z . CC W QQ � W = u. WO g Q W Z = Z I U • � CI W W H H • • (I) ce z COMMENTS: Type of Inspection: f 1.—cmesc p .. c. Address 1 51 &A X/1"k 1)Y. . 40^6.0. 1 kr) cuA4- A / bi : "r‘ t 41,:vel 1oJte. of .&11..ti 0," ON ttRt, a.m. P.m. Requester: .}-vjtikl 4 .7.401J(.? 1 (1) JA v; t ri",... 3 -wlitrvelu. , wf .A„ ? . y • At JACAkn tolltiv- 3 ( 0-Q (...tWa-beit.k. trul t•: 3 ° ( • Ptottai L.,r,t-e.A. - . Project:C 54(.0 6,, scA i ,,,.e... Type of Inspection: f 1.—cmesc p .. c. Address 1 51 &A X/1"k 1)Y. Date called: 5 - 1 1 00 Special instructions: . , ,., . : Mt^ Date wanted: S — 1)- - 00 a.m. P.m. Requester: .}-vjtikl 4 .7.401J(.? 1 Ph Phone: eAvK- z6..2-,2.4/S"- INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Iwo() - 00 PERMIT NO. (206)431-3670 V Approved per applicable codes. n Corrections required prior to approval. Inspector: Date: A.- I i2 ) 0D El $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: • *; ..titaA44•Ziftifaik,a Afr OSird.A. 4t0 L c:\carohgeneral\c12000-009.doc City of Tukwila Steven M..Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director DATE: January 24, 2000 APPLICANT: Costco Gas Station RE: D2000-009 ADDRESS: 1141 Saxon Drive PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS Please review the following comments listed below and submit your revisions accordingly. If you have any questions on the requested revision, Carol Lumb is the planner assigned to the file and can be reached at 206-431-3661. • 1. The landscape plan for D2000-009 must be consistent with the landscape plan approved by the Board of Architectural Review under L97-0032, the design review for the original gasoline station. In those plans, Honey Locust trees are used in the internal landscape islands in the parking lot, not Red Maples. Please see the attached marked- up plan. 2. The eight-foot high electrical shack on the concrete slab must be screened the same as the controller approved under L97-0032, a continuation of the osmanthus shrubs 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 January 21, 2000 City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director TO: Jack Pace, Pl g anager FM: Carol Lum , ssociate Planner RE: Costco Gas Station Addition: Minor Modification to BAR Approved Design We have received a building permit application from Costco (D2000-009) to add a fourth fuel island to the existing site on Saxon Drive. In order to add the new fuel 'island, several revisions to the current site plan approved by the BAR are proposed: move the driveway entrance on Saxon approximately 50 feet to the west; move the exit from site to Christensen Drive to the south approximately 25 feet; add a planting island to help direct on -site traffic; and remove several parking stalls and re- establish the landscape planter island. I have reviewed the site plan approved by the BAR for the original proposal, (L97 -0032) and compared it with the revised plan submitted under D2000 -009. I believe that the proposed addition of the fuel island and revised circulation plan for the site, with subsequent landscaping changes is a minor modification of the original proposal. Removed landscaping is being replaced or relocated, and any lost parking stalls do not affect the required number of parking stalls for the Costco Optical Lab. Several corrections are needed to the trees proposed by the landscaping plan to make it consistent with the landscaping approved by the BAR in 1997. These corrections will be addressed through review of the building permit application. TMC 18.60.030 D authorizes the Director to approve minor, insignificant modifications that have no impact on the project design. Attached are copies of the original landscaping/site plan approved by the BAR and the site plan proposed by D2000 -009. If you agree that D2000 -009 represents a minor modification, please sign below and return this memo to me. If you have any questions, please call me at 431 -3661. Attachments: Exhibit F and H, L97 -0032 Proposed Site Plan, D2000 -009 q: \carol \general\L97 - 0032- minonnod.doc MEMORANDUM Pace, Planning Manager 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 LF,.• e 4. . t. Nm �a, ici(: t�? 7bt.,.. w.:: tu... t+ilit::J:.�efiiiGCl�:•irOitit: th.lr1i $:i4c7+.da3 Y zi 't`+?:S`ra.e'rxTe`r,'✓.'s';e Vr6wrSu';YW:1itSiiY`d�Js. ail cc ~ w U 0 cn w J = CO U. w o ' D Cy . w z �., I— o Z �— ur R w w . I U` o wz , . U -I F=� 0 c DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office, 3190 - 160th Ave S.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98008 -5452 • (206) 649-7000 October 14, 1997 Kathy Nishihira Costco Wholesale 999 Lake Drive Issaquah WA 98027 Dear Ms. Nishihira: STATE OF WASHINGTON Re: City of Tukwila Permit # L97 -0032 COSTCO WHOLESALE - Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit # 1997 -NW -40091 The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit, to construct a 2,240 sq. ft. high canopy over 6 pump islands, install three 20,000 gallon underground fuel tanks and landscaping within existing parking lot, has been filed with this office by the City of Tukwila on September 29, 1997. The development authorized by the subject permit may NOT begin until the end of the 21 -day appeal period, October 20, 1997. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if this permit is appealed. Other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to the subject permit. If this permit is NOT appealed, this letter constitutes the Department of Ecology's final notification of action on this permit. Sincerely, Ann E. Kenny, Shorelands Specialist Shorelands and Water Resources Program AEK:aek SDP.DOC cc: Jack Pace, City of Tukwila RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA OCT 1 ,1997 PERMIT CENTER !i? z = H: , . z; mo w!. • • JU, 00 I co f:3 w to co tL w o J u.<' ° d. I z �:. o: !w w= X V , o' U 0 ■ rr"""E'''' Dr. Gail Thompson Historical Research Associates, Inc. 119 Pine Street, Suite 207 Seattle, WA 98101 STATE OF WASHINGTON October 1, 1997 Log No: 091897 -04 -KI Project: Costco Wholesale Sincerely, Robert G. Whitlam, Ph.D. State Archaeologist DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY, TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION 111 21st Avenue S.W. • P.O. Box 48343 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -8343 • (360) 753-41)11 Dear Dr. Thompson; Thank you for contacting our office regarding the proposed monitoring plan for the Costco Wholesale underground gasoline storage tanks in Tukwila. We concur with your plan. bFa } HRA HISTORICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. SEATTLE MISSOULA WASHINGTON D. C. 119 Pine Street Suite 207 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 343-0226 FAX (206) 343 -0249 Dear Rob: I"Cc w /enc.): Mr. Vernon Numetsu, City of Tukwila 6500 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 R.ECE1VED SEP 19 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Dr. Robert G. Whitlam State Archaeologist State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation P.O. Box 48343 Olympia, WA 98504 -8343 Sincerely, Gail Thompson, Ph.D. Vice President Building & Planning Dept. September 16, 1997 As we discussed on September 5, Costco Wholesale is planning to install underground gasoline storage tanks at 1160 Saxon Drive in Tukwila, a location that is close to the Green River. The site's current cover of asphalt and fill makes archaeological survey impractical but its proximity to the Green River means that buried archaeological resources could exist. You have requested archaeological monitoring of the excavation and recommended preparation of a monitoring plan. I am enclosing an archaeological monitoring plan for the project. Could you please review it and let me know your comments as soon as practical? If I don't hear from you by October 13, I'll assume that you don't have any comments. The Mulvanny Partnership, architects for the project and agent for Costco, are providing review copies of the plan to the Muckleshoot and Duwamish Indian Tribes. Thank you very much for your review of this plan; I look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions or need more information, please contact me at 206 -343- 0226. ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE COSTCO WHOLESALE UNDERGROUND GASOLINE STORAGE TANKS TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Prepared for COSTCO WHOLESALE C/O MULVANNY PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS 11820 NORTHUP WAY, SUITE E300 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98005 By Gail Thompson, Ph.D. HISTORICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. 119 Pine Street, Suite 207 Seattle, Washington 98101 September 16, 1997 HRA# 569CIS '"rin.�.'J�'�'.'?.�� �l;l h:4v v���u�it�if &fl: Ar' r; F';-" sT .t.'..'�.'ii:,::�:i: %ci'i��:fi�2 •p ;. }— Z J V ! . U 0 N os. vo Ili MI W O g J. LL Q. = Z Z 0: ILI al 2 Di ;C3 'W W ' O ~' S TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 ETHNOHISTORY AND PREHISTORY 4 2.1 Ethnohistory 4 2.2 Prehistory 5 3.0 MONITORING PLAN 7 4.0 SCHEDULE 8 5.0 REFERENCES CITED 9 Figure 1 Figure 3 ....,. �.: xek' f� ?:;e��;�- ii+ "F52ri�t%�e�variric. �:•::.'+"aS,'i�re ; "!r';;i- §i;.`A?; >'irn`v ^:�;v:•,� :„su�z':44�;1cit`i� 1:�''; ?ru'. LIST OF FIGURES Location of Proposed Costco Wholesale Underground Gasoline Storage Tanks Figure 2 Underground tanks to be located beneath parking lot in center of photograph. Green River levee located behind fence east of parking lot. . Underground tanks to be located beneath pavement in left center of photograph. Green River levee located beyond vegetation at left. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Costco Wholesale plans to construct a facility at 1160 Saxon Drive in Tukwila, Washington, that will include an excavation for underground gasoline storage tanks (Figure 1). The site, which lies in the floodplain adjacent to the Green River just north of where S. 180th Street /S.W. 43rd Street crosses it, is currently capped with three to five feet of fill, paved, and used as a parking lot (Figures 2 and 3). A number of prehistoric and early historic Indian archaeological sites have been found buried partly or completely beneath flood sediments in the area, particularly along the Black River to the north, suggesting that the Costco site has the potential for buried archaeological deposits. Unfortunately, the presence of pavement and fill materials onsite makes it impractical to conduct an intensive archaeological survey. The State Archaeologist, State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP), has requested that construction monitoring'take place to assure that excavation. does not damage significant archaeological remains. This report provides a plan for monitoring excavation activities at the site. Section 2.0 presents information on the ethnohistory and prehistory of the Costco Project Area. The monitoring plan is contained in Section 3.0, and Section 4.0 discusses the work schedule. A list of references cited is included in Section 5.0. 1 rt 111 n U 0 { CO o' CO w ,w = J CO LL w 0 , to D = a I- o Z w W. D o: OI ,w w 0 Z` U Z oject Location - Figure 1 Location of Proposed Costco Wholesale Underground Gasoline Storage Tanks (USGS 7.5 -min. Renton and Des Moines, Washington, Quadrangles). 2 31 i�' 14,11 c exi+t$fffoMiE '+.! §'t, 5ii�'sitz''�,.rs`isa%3'• rr's�rJi%C.t°e5a�:v�;i�." iii, °a.�2i�'�i;'��t.';`ivuiir� , .......----.. ' - : • - Figure 2 Underground tanks to be located beneath parking lot in center of photograph. Green River levee located behind fence east of parking lot. _ Figure 3 Underground tanks to be located beneath pavement in left center of photograph. Green River levee located beyond vegetation at left. 3 2.0 ETHNOHISTORY AND PREHISTORY Information on the ethnohistory and prehistory of the Costco Site area indicates its potential for containing archaeological deposits. The following sections summarize Indian land use and past archaeological excavations in the vicinity of the Project Area. 2.1 Ethnohistory The Costco Project Area is located within the aboriginal territory of the Duwamish, who spoke a Coast Salish language, and occupied an area that extended from the northern end of Lake Washington east around Lake Sammamish, south to the lower Green (formerly White) River and the Duwamish River valleys, and along the shoreline of Puget Sound from near Three Tree Point north to the present Richmond Beach (Haeberlin and Gunther 1930; Smith 1940; Spier 1936). The territory of the Green and White River Indians was located nearby in the drainages of those rivers. The descendants of these latter groups are now federally recognized as the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, with fishing rights extending through the Costco Project Area, while the Duwamish tribal organization is not currently recognized by the federal government. The valley where the historic Black River entered the Duwamish River contained abundant natural resources and supported a number of Duwamish villages before 1916 when engineers completed the Chittenden Locks and lowered Lake Washington, eliminating the Black River. The Duwamish Indians' economy emphasized several species of salmon and steelhead, which filled the waters of the Duwamish River and its tributary streams. The people also used plants, other fish and shellfish, waterfowl, and land game, all of which they obtained from various environmental settings along the rivers, valleys, surrounding uplands, and the Puget Sound shoreline. Several families occupied parts of large plank houses in permanent winter villages. From spring through fall, smaller family groups dispersed to camps in various locations to fish, gather, and hunt resources, which they used fresh and preserved for use in winter. Researchers recorded ethnohistoric sites to the north and south of the Project Area (Waterman 1920). About two miles north was the Duwamish village of Sqoa'l -qo or "meeting of rivers," located at the confluence of the Green (formerly White) River and the Black River. About two miles to the south was a village called StEq, "a log jam," where Chief Seattle was born. The aboriginal territories of the Duwamish and nearby Indian groups provided the bulk of their subsistence foods, technological materials, and medicines as well as surpluses for trading with other groups. A number of geographical locations in their territory figured into the legends and spiritual life of the Duwamish. Both the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and the Duwamish Tribal Organization value the archaeological sites located within their aboriginal territories. These tribal organizations are concerned about the disturbance of such sites; they are especially concerned about the disturbance of any burials or isolated human bones. 4 % ;r; VA-4 ‘AA ,.q`4,4aulott f ivw∎ fm, 2.2 Prehistory Archaeologists have recorded a number of archaeological sites in the valleys of the lower Green River, the Black River, and the Duwamish River (OAHP Files), and excavations have focused on some of these sites. These include the Tualdad Altu Site (45KI59, Chatters 1988; Chatters et al. 1990), the Allentown Site (45KI431, Lewarch et al. 1996), the White Lake Site (45KI438 & 438A, Lewarch et al. 1996), and the Sbabadid Site (45KI51, Chatters 1981). The archaeological deposits called Tualdad Altu (45KI59) were located on a north terrace of the Black River about three miles northeast of the Costco Project Area. The deposits occurred on a surface between 1.0 and 1.2 meters beneath the present ground surface (Chatters 1988; Chatters et al. 1990). Four stratigraphic levels of midden with clusters of hearths made up the site, { which also contained a number of dwelling structures interpreted as longhouses. The archaeologists concluded that the houses had been built at least four times between AD 200 and 400 and that the uppermost house had been occupied by at least. two families who emphasized different economic activities. For a King County Department of Natural Resources, Water Pollution Division facilities project, archaeologists conducted data recovery investigations at two archaeological sites in the Duwamish River drainage: the Allentown Site (45KI431), located along the Duwamish River about four miles northwest of the Costco Project Area, and the White Lake Site (45KI438 & 45KI438A), located at the confluence of the Green (formerly White) and Black Rivers (Lewarch et al. 1996). The researchers concluded that both sites were occupied during the past 500 years, although each site appears to represent different activities. Indian people camped at the Allentown Site during the latter part of the summer and fall to net chum salmon and steelhead, collect and process berries, and hunt birds and mammals. By contrast, three episodes of occupation at the White Lake Site reflected activities at various seasons to process and consume immediately plant products and fish. Researchers concluded that the White Lake site formed a part of the large Duwamish Indian village called Sqoa'l - ( Lewarch et al. 1996). At the Sbabadid Site (45KI51), located near Tualdad Altu, Chatters (1981) identified several areas of midden, consisting of shell fragments; charcoal; fish, bird, and mammal bones; stone debitage; and historical beads and flat glass fragments, at depths between 0.5 and 1.0 meter below the present ground surface. Features included fire hearths with ash, charcoal, and burned soil and bone; plant material; and small layers of pebbles. The researcher investigated some structures, which he interpreted as single - family dwellings and a longhouse. He concluded that these remains were associated with fishing, gathering, and hunting activities dating between about AD 1790 and 1845, based on the analysis of historical artifacts. Later work at the Sbabadid Site encountered human remains, possibly from tree burials associated with a large oak tree on the property (Lewarch et al. 1996; Stump 1990). In addition to a human bone, the materials included fragments of cedar wood, woven cedar bark and twisted cedar thread, cloth, trade beads, and buttons. Based on the age of the historical artifacts, the remains were judged to date to the mid -1800s (Stump 1990). 5 ?,; ..+C•i�1e;L� ::%'Ar15- Y.:�,:a: i eefi kstEv 'ttivW.le.'tkLN14i{ `.44'+'3,' `:1 #L�6sai� i ',61;is1guti£7di..�FC;15; ∎.v'`i ii/kAi z Iz re tu J U 0 0 0 : cow U) L L w 0 Q a Z _ z � o '. z n • 0 oN ; = U . 0 w z. ~ z The types of archaeological deposits known to occur in area sites include thick, stratified midden deposits with hearths and postmolds that formed at the locations of reoccupied houses or temporary structures, thin midden deposits sometimes containing hearths, pits, and other features that formed outside of living structures, and burials and isolated human bones. 6 1 3.0 MONITORING PLAN The State Archaeologist, Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, has recommended archaeological monitoring of excavations for the Costco Wholesale underground gasoline storage tank. HRA staff will work with representatives of the Costco Wholesale, the Mulvanny Partnership Architects, and the construction contractor to schedule the excavation as soon as practical after construction permits have been issued. Early detection of any buried archaeological deposits will allow more time to evaluate them, and determine and implement appropropriate treatment in consultation with the State Archaeologist. HRA anticipates using one archaeologist to monitor construction. The archaeologist will coordinate his /her work with the construction supervisor and equipment operators, and will follow safety procedures set forth by construction personnel. When practicable, the HRA staff member will request equipment operators to remove sediment matrix in 20 -cm scrapes using toothless buckets /blades. The archaeologist will observe excavation in designated areas from a safe, but effective distance. He /she will watch as equipment operators deposit excavated sediment in backdirt piles. If trenches are excavated, the construction contractor will shore the walls for safety if it becomes necessary to enter a trench. The archaeologist will document his /her activities in field notebooks, photograph relevant archaeological remains and construction activities, and coordinate on a daily basis with HRA's Principal Investigator. If potentially significant archaeological deposits are discovered during construction, including stratified midden, sheet midden lenses, or features, HRA will redirect construction away from the immediate vicinity of the find, evaluate the character, extent, and apparent significance of the remains, and contact Costco Wholesale. If necessary, HRA will recommend a plan for more detailed evaluation of discovered archaeological remains and develop measures to mitigate potential adverse effects. If human remains are encountered during monitoring, the HRA archaeologist will request that the construction supervisor stop ground disturbing activities in the immediate area, and the archaeologist will immediately notify the State Archaeologist and offices of the Duwamish tribal organization and the Muckleshoot Tribe. The tribes will determine the treatment and disposition of human remains and associated grave goods. Costco Wholesale will provide security and protection for the burial site, as needed. 1 4.0 SCHEDULE HRA will provide Costco Wholesale with an archaeologist for construction monitoring within several days of receiving authorization. HRA generally requires two days notice to provide field personnel. A monitoring cost estimate and a budget to manage the project and prepare .a report has been provided to Costco Wholesale under separate cover. 5.0 REFERENCES CITED Chatters, James C. 1981 Archaeology of the Sbabadid Site, 45KI51, King County, Washington. Office of Public Archaeology, University of Washington. On file at State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. 1988 Tualdad Altu: A Fourth Century Village on the Black River, King County, Washington. Report submitted to First City Equities, Seattle. On file at State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Chatters, J.C., D.E. Rhode, and K.A. Hoover 1990 Tualdad Altu (45KI59): A Prehistoric Riverine Village in Southern Puget Sound. Archaeology in Washington 2:23 -48. Haeberlin, H. and E. Gunther 1930 The Indians of Puget Sound. University of Washington, Publications in Anthropology 4(1):1 -84. Lewarch, D.E., L.L. Larson, L.A. Forsman, G.F. Moura, E.W. Bangs, and P.M. Johnson 1996 King County Department of Natural Resources, Water Pollution Control Division, Alki Transfer /CSO Project, Allentown Site (45KI431) and White Lake Site (45KI438 and 45KI439) Data Recovery. LAAS Technical Report #95 -8. Submitted to HDR Engineering, Inc., by Larson Anthropological /Archaeological Services. On file at State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP) n.d. Files of information on recorded archaeological sites. Department of Community and Economic Development, Olympia, Washington. Smith, M.W. 1940 The Puyallup - Nisqually. Columbia University Contributions to Anthropology 32. Spier, Leslie 1936 Tribal Distribution in Washington. General Series in Anthropology No. 3, "George Banta Publishing Company, Menasha, Wisconsin. Stump, S. 1990 Letter report on the Ozbolt Property. Submitted by BOAS, Inc., to Gregory Development Company, December 31. On file at State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. 9 % : .z . = H. W: 00 • cnw • w =' CO I 0. 2 i a ,. _. 1-0 Z • D Dom: • .H V ; W Z4. v = . .O ~ • .z !'.. Waterman, T.T. 1920 Puget Sound Geography. Ms. on microfilm, Suzzallo Library, University of Washington, Microfilm #A3435. 10 97809 978O9(1 1)M is (09117/97 ): s s CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Page 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 Road Network 1 Traffic Volumes 4 TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS 5 Trip Generation 5 New Project Trip Distribution 9 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 11 MITIGATION 12 SUMMARY 12 APPENDIX A - LOS Concept B - LOS Calculations FIGURES Page 1. Project Vicinity 2 2., Site Plan 3 3. Existing Traffic Volumes 1989 -1997 6 4. Project Net New Trip Distribution 10 TABLES 1. Study Intersection Count Dates 2. Typical Costco Gas Station Trip Generation Study History 7 3. Trip Generation Summary 9 4. 1997 Intersection Level of Service Analysis 12 5. Mitigation Costs Page 4 13 U O • of wo • J • =I, • • z �.. :Z • , tA = W , Z`. •U co • : - • • INTRODUCTION This report documents the traffic impact analysis performed for the proposed Costco Gas Station to be located in Tukwila, Washington. The following report documents the trip generation estimate and trip distribution for the proposed gas station. The proposed Costco Gas Station will be located south of Saxon Drive and east of Andover Park East (figure 1). The site is currently a portion of the Costco Optical Lab parking lot (figure 2). The James Christensen Pedestrian /Bicycle Trail and the Green River are adjacent to the site on the east side. At the time of the Costco Gas Station's planned opening in early 1998, the site will consist of 12 fuel pumping stations. There are no other vending facilities planned for the gas station. It is designed as a fully automated operation. The Costco gas station is a new concept for the Costco Wholesale Corporation. There are currently not any such gas stations in the State of Washington, although one is currently being planned for the Federal Way Costco, and there are a handful in other parts of the country. The gas station to be located in Tukwila will only be available to Costco members —a non - Costco member cannot get fuel at the station, even at a slightly higher rate. The most direct driveway leading into the site is Saxon Drive, which provides ingress from and egress to Andover Park East. Saxon Drive is currently a private road primarily serving the existing Costco Wholesale Store and Optical Lab. This driveway is signalized at Andover Park East. The gas station could have been accessed via Christensen Road from South 180th Street by driving through the Home Depot parking lot; however, Home Depot has requested that this roadway be chained off so that access between Costco and Home Depot will no longer be possible. EXISTING CONDITIONS Road Network The major access streets to the proposed Costco Gas Station site are South 180th Street, West Valley Highway, and Andover Park East. West Valley Highway (SR 181) is a five -lane north -south principal arterial with two through lanes in each direction and a two -way left -turn lane. It provides a link to the west Kent area south of the project site and northeast Tukwila north of the project site. It also provides a connection to the City of Renton via its interchange with Interstate 405 (1 -405). South 180th Street is a five -lane east -west minor arterial with two through lanes in each direction and a two -way left -turn lane. This roadway provides a major connection from Tukwila's central business district to the West Valley Highway and Kent. 97809\(01)uia(09117/97):ss 1 B020 97609 -11 Costco (7/10/97) AGT ( I, VFP Q a /4(0 S T 6i eaN Q ' ay NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. O lt 1 /i cn 57th Ave. S. 58th Ave. S. z A 0 8020 97809-11 Costco (7/10/97) AGT NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. mm Drawing# . • Andover Park East is a four -lane north -south collector arterial with two through lanes in each direction and left -turn pockets at the critical intersections. It serves as an alternative northbound route to West Valley Highway. It is also a potential route to 1 -5 via Southcenter Boulevard and Tukwila Parkway and to 1 -405 via Southcenter Boulevard. Traffic Volumes Existing traffic volume data for the arterial street network and intersections were provided by the City of Tukwila Engineering Department, City of Renton Engineering Department, and supplemented by additional intersection turn movement counts by Entranco. The count information was gathered between 1989 and 1997 for the study intersections as shown in table 1. Average daily traffic (ADT) was measured on Andover Park East in the vicinity of Costco on Saturday July 13, 1996 and Tuesday, July 16, 1996. Northbound ADT on Saturday was 2,955 and 5,290 on Tuesday. Southbound ADT on Saturday was 4,252 and 6,713 on Tuesday. Intersection Table 1 Study Intersection Count Dates Saturday A.M. P.M. Peak Peak Peak 11 South 180th St/Southcenter Pkwy 10/92 12 South 180th St/Andover Park West 10/92 13 South 180th St/Andover Park East 7/96 6/97 7/96 15 South 180th St/Sperry Dr 7/96 6/97 7/96 16 South 180th St/West Valley Hwy 12/93 8/93 10 Andover Park East/Minkler Blvd 8/91 17 Andover Park East/Saxon Dr 7/96 6/97 7/96 14 Andover Park East/Baker Blvd 3/90 3/90 5 Andover Park East/Tukwila Pkwy 3/90 4 Andover Park West/Tukwila Pkwy 3/90 6 Strander Blvd /Southcenter Pkwy 8/95 3/90 7 Strander Blvd /Andover Park West 4/91 8 Strander Blvd /Andover Park East 3/90 3/91 9 Strander Blvd/West Valley Hwy 3/91 1 Interurban Ave /I -405 SB Ramps 12/94 12/94 3 West Valley Hwy /I -405 NB Ramps 12/94 12/94 2 Southcenter Blvd/West Valley Hwy 12/94 12/94 97809 \(11) \tia(09 /17/97):ss 4 } Avzia..grawsriro.N2 .ttra�1i' s&v..tmoro gf!ksznr`v i S ;:l*G:'+R`aYI'I�."S;I..+^. - Entranco performed turn movement counts at the intersections of South 180th Street/Sperry Drive, Andover Park East/Saxon Drive, and South 180th Street/Andover Park East during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours, and the Saturday peak hour. These counts were performed on June 19 and 21, 1997. However, the counts at these intersections reflect inter - development traffic movement on Christensen Road between Costco and Home Depot. Entranco also performed weekday p.m. peak hour and Saturday peak hour counts in July 1996 with the development of the Costco Optical Lab. The July 1996 counts were performed prior to the opening of Christensen Road to Home Depot and Costco; therefore, these counts were used for analysis purposes. Figure 3 shows the existing weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour and Saturday peak hour traffic volumes on primary access routes in the study area based on Entranco's counts and data from the cities. TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS Trip Generation The City of Tukwila requested trip generation estimates for the weekday daily, a.m. peak hour, and p.m. peak hour; and Saturday daily and peak hour. Trip generation rates also have been provided for the weekday noon peak hour for comparison. Typically, trip generation rates used to estimate the number of new trips from a gas station are obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, February 1995 Update to the Fifth Edition. However, due to the unique characteristics of a Costco gas station, the trip generation for the proposed site was based on trip generation rates derived from data at four existing Costco gas stations located around the country. The following data were collected at the four existing Costco gas stations between November 1996 and February 1997: • number of gas station transactions during the p.m. peak hour • total daily gas station transactions on a weekday and weekend day • survey data documenting the number of gas station transactions that also included a visit to the Costco Wholesale Store (internal trips) In addition, noon peak hour gas station transactions were obtained from the four existing gas stations on July 10, 1997. Transaction data used to develop trip generation data will be provided to the City separately from this report. 97809\(11)uia(09n 7 /97):ss 5 Z • D J U ;. '0 0; • 0: W =. CO IL 'W 0 • g a. cy Cn 1 _. I . z � w w 2 o ' ;0 1 -].• .w W' �W H 0:. z, . 0 u _. z • All four existing gas station sites have 12 pump locations, although some of the sites allowed non - Costco members to obtain gas at the pumps at a higher cost than Costco members, while transaction data were collected. The effect this will have on using this data to estimate trips at the Tukwila site is that a more conservative trip generation rate will be used. Data for the four existing Costco gas stations and an average of the four sites are shown in table 2. Weekday p.m. peak hour trip rates range between 10.67 and 35.33 trips per pump, with an average of 22.31 trips per pump. When the p.m. peak hour trip generation rate is compared to the ITE Trip Generation Manual rate (15.76 trips per pump), it is shown that the Costco rate is higher (and therefore more conservative) than the ITE rate. Although transaction counts were not obtained for the weekend peak hour, it was estimated by multiplying the weekend daily total by the ratio of the weekday p.m. peak hour total to the weekday daily total for each site. The average weekend peak hour trip rate, therefore, was estimated as slightly higher than the weekday p.m. peak hour trip rate at 24.57 trips per pump. The average weekday and weekend daily rates of the four existing gas station sites were estimated at 138.54 and 143.11 trips per pump, respectively. Table 2 Typical Costco Gas Station Trip Generation Study History Costco Gas Station Location Oxnard, CA Albuquerque, NM Santa Clara, CA Tucson, AZ Average Number of Pumps 12 12 12 12 12 Trips Noon Peak Hour 244 234 292 280 263 P.M. Peak Hour 128 364 424 155 268 Weekday Daily 734 2,124 2,478 1,314 1,663 Weekend Daily 750 2,140 2,262 n/a 1,717 Rate Noon Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Weekday Daily Weekend Pk. Hour Weekend Daily Percent Internal Trips 77% 73% 20.33 19.50 24.33 23.33 21.88 10.67 30.33 35.33 12.92 22.31 61.17 177.00 206.50 109.50 138.54 10.90 30.56 32.25 n/a 24.57 62.50 178.33 188.50 n/a 143.11 70% 1. Trips are associated with gas station only, and do not include trips to wholesale store only. 2. Rates are given as trips per gas pump. 3. Internal trips are trips in which the patron went to both the gas station and the wholesale store. 68% 72% 978O9k(11)\tia(09/ 17/97):ss 7 The noon peak hour trip generation rates for the four existing sites ranged between 19.50 and 24.33 trips per pump, with an average trip rate of 21.88 trips per pump. The average noon peak hour trip rate is slightly lower the average p.m. peak hour trip rate. The City also requested a trip generation analysis for the a.m. peak hour. Because Costco Wholesale stores are not open during the typical a.m. peak period, and because most of the trips generated by the gas station are considered internal trips (therefore the gas station is expected to generate fewer trips during the a.m. peak hour than at any F- w rt other time during the day), Costco has not conducted trip generation studies for the gas station during the a.m. peak hour at the four sites listed in table 2. However, Costco has . v 0 0 : collected trip generation counts at one existing gas station for the period from 6:30 to w 0 mow; 10:30 a.m., which is when the gas station was open, but the Wholesale store was not 1 1 open. The study did not break down the data by the hour or the peak hour; however, the study concluded that 5 percent of the daily trips at the gas station occurred during this w o four -hour morning period. g u. Q To estimate a trip generation rate for the gas station during the a.m. peak hour, it was CO ca , conservatively assumed that half of the trips observed during the a.m. four -hour study F' _ period occurred during the a.m. peak hour. Therefore the weekday a.m. peak hour trip i- ~ o generation rate was estimated to be 2.5 percent of the average weekday daily total trip w rate, or 3.46 trips per pump. > O • N Based on survey data provided by Costco Wholesale Stores at the four existing gas :0 H- station sites, it was found that on average, 72 percent of the patrons using the gas station - cw�. are also going to the wholesale store, which is known as an internal trip. These are vehicle trips that are, and will be, on the road network, whether or not the Costco gas — z station is constructed. Therefore internal trips are not considered new trips. v The average trip generation rates and internal trip percentage were used to estimate the z number of net new trips associated with the proposed Costco gas station to be located in Tukwila. The trip generation for the Tukwila Costco gas station is documented in table 3. The total trips generated by a project can sometimes be reduced by a pass -by trip factor. Pass -by trips are defined as trips made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination. Based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual February 1995 Update, the percentage of gross project generated trips classified as pass -by trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour for a gas station is 52 percent, and 58 percent during the weekday a.m. peak hour (see table 3). Accounting for internal and pass -by trips, the net new trips generated by the Tukwila Costco gas station in the weekday noon and p.m. peak hour is 36 trips, while the weekend peak hour will experience 40 net new trips. 97809 \(11)\tia(09 /17/97):ss 8 • Z.ri.`44LAW C . -' ' Table 3 Trip Generation Summary Number of Trip Generation Trips Trips Total Pumps Rate In Out Trips Weekday A.M. Peak Hour 12 3.46 21 21 42 Less Pass -by Trips (58 %) 12 12 24 Net New Trips 9 9 18 Weekday Noon Peak Hour 12 21.88 131 132 263 Less Internal Trips (72 %) 94 95 189 Less Pass -by Trips (52 %) 19 19 38 Net New Trips 18 18 36 Weekday P.M. Peak Hour 12 22.31 134 134 268 Less Internal Trips (72 %) 97 96 193 Less Pass -by Trips (52 %) 19 20 39 Net New Trips 18 18 36 Weekday Daily Total 12 138.54 831 831 1,662 Less Internal Trips (72 %) 598 598 1,196 Less Pass -by Trips (52 %) 121 121 242 Net New Trips 112 112 224 Weekend Peak Hour 12 24.57 148 147 295 Less Internal Trips (72 %) 106 106 212 Less Pass -by Trips (52 %) 22 21 43 Net New Trips 20 20 40 Weekend Daily Total 12 143.11 858 859 1,717 Less Internal Trips (72 %) 618 618 1,236 Less Pass -by Trips (52 %) 125 125 250 Net New Trips 115 116 231 1. The trip generation rates are given as trips per gas pump. Pass -by trip reduction percentages were obtained from the ITE Trip Generation Manual , February 1995 Update to the Fifth Edition. Pass -by trip reduction percentages for this time period are not provided in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, February 1995 Update to the Fifth Edition, therefore, the p.m. peak hour pass -by trip reduction percentage was assumed. New Project Trip Distribution The trip distribution and assignment for the proposed development's trip generation was based on the existing travel patterns (figure 3), access to the major arterials, and access to 1 -5 and 1 -405. Figure 4 depicts the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour and weekend peak hour trip assignment of the net new project - generated volumes on the surrounding street network. 97909\(11)uta(09mi97):ss 9 S TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS The City of Tukwila requested a level of service (LOS) analysis at the intersection of Saxon Drive /Andover Park East during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours and the weekend peak hour. This signalized intersection is the primary access point for the proposed gas station to and from the City's network. In addition, the City requested that the operations of the South 180th Street/Andover Park East and the South 180th Street/Sperry Drive intersections also be analyzed. A planning level LOS analysis was conducted using the principles of the Transportation Research Board's Circular 212, through a computer software package, NCAP. The concept of planning level LOS is to rate intersections operationally based on the ratio of the volume of traffic going through the intersection to the capacity of the intersection (v /c ratio). The LOS of an intersection is ranked from "A" (low v/c ratio) to "F" (v /c ratio exceeding 1.0). The LOS concept is discussed in greater detail in Appendix A. As mentioned previously, traffic counts at the analyzed intersections were obtained in 1997 prior to the decision to restrict through traffic on Christensen Road between Home Depot and Costco. As a result of Home Depot's request to restrict through traffic on Christensen Road, travel patterns will significantly change. Counts obtained in July 1996 for the weekday p.m. peak hour and Saturday peak hour reflect traffic patterns before Christensen Road was open. Therefore, the 1996 counts were used for the LOS analysis for the weekday p.m. peak hour and the Saturday peak hour. It was thought that the 1997 a.m. peak hour counts could be used to determine the existing LOS conditions only, because the Costco Store is not yet open during the a.m. peak hour. In addition, Costco gas station trip projections for the a.m. peak hour are half of the p.m. peak hour and the 1997 weekday a.m. peak hour counts are lower than the 1996 weekday p.m. peak hour counts, making the weekday p.m. peak hour the worst case scenario in terms of operational analysis. To determine 1998 (projected year of opening for the gas station) traffic volumes, a one - percent per year growth in traffic was applied to the 1996 counts, which the City confirmed as a conservative yearly growth factor for this area. In addition, projected new trips from the Costco Optical Lab (obtained from July 1996 Entranco Report) were also added to the project- impacted intersections. The results of the LOS analysis are presented in table 4, with LOS calculations presented in Appendix B. The LOS conditions currently experienced at the three intersections range between LOS "A" and LOS "C ". By 1998, the LOS at the three impacted intersections will range between LOS "A" and LOS "D ", with a maximum increase in the v/c ratio of 0.02. The LOS of the three intersections remains unchanged when the new project trips are added to the 1998 network, with a maximum 0.02 increase in the v/c ratio during some peak hours at some of the intersections. 97809\(11)uia(09mi97):ss 11 z JU U O• • � 0 III z: J CO Lt., w 0, 2 <. •D � r z �. I- O. .z I-: • w af 'D 0 N, :0 F- O • z; • U co: O z .. Table 4 Intersection Level of Service Analysis Existing 1998 Without 1998 With Conditions Project Project v/c LOS v/c LOS Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Saxon Drive /Andover Park East 0.12 A S 180th Street/Andover Park East 0.39 A S 180th Street/Sperry Drive 0.38 A Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Saxon Drive /Andover Park East 0.41 A 0.42 A 0.44 A S 180th Street/Andover Park East 0.79 C 0.81 D 0.82 D S 180th Street/Sperry Drive 0.61 B 0.62 B 0.62 B Saturday Peak Hour Saxon Drive /Andover Park East 0.38 A 0.39 A 0.41 A S 180th Street/Andover Park East 0.52 A 0.53 A 0.54 A S 180th Street/Sperry Drive 0.46 A 0.47 A 0.48 A Planning level of service calculations were based on principles of the Transportation Research Board's Circular 212. MITIGATION The mitigation for the proposed project is based on the Mitigation Proportionate Fair Share Costs for various intersections as presented in the Transportation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The amount to be submitted for mitigation is based on the total project -trips entering the intersections from the project at rates proportionate to the cost of projected improvements per trip. The mitigation associated with the proposed development is summarized in table 5 and totals $21,388. SUMMARY The proposed Costco gas station will be located in the existing parking lot of the Costco Optical Lab just south of the existing Costco Wholesale Store on Saxon Drive. Based on the trip generation rates developed from transaction counts at existing Costco gas station locations in California and Arizona, the proposed Tukwila Costco gas station will generate 36 net new trips during both the weekday noon and p.m. peak hours, and 40 net new trips during the Saturday peak hours. Through a Costco survey, it was determined that more than 70 percent of the trips generated by the gas station are internal trips, or trips made between the Costco Wholesale Store and the gas station. 978091(11)Uia(09/17/97):ss 12 a t z w -J 0: U .(n w; w •J �. a _. z1...; Z o; w . :0F . SP W' = U ` • z . F 's z .... .. � • Intersection Table 5 Mitigation Costs Cost Per Trip Number Mitigation of Trips Payment South 180th Street/West Valley Highway Andover Park East/Baker Boulevard Strander Boulevard /Southcenter Parkway Strander Boulevard /Andover Park West Strander Boulevard /Andover Park East Strander Boulevard/West Valley Highway Interurban Bridge Total Mitigation Cost $475 $377 $140 $317 $135 $283 $1,122 1. Mitigation proportionate fair share cost per peak hour trip as presented in of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. Mitigation payment was based on the weekend peak hour trip generation this time period generated the highest number of trips. 13 8 7 10 20 7 3 $6,175 $3,016 $980 $3,170 $2,700 $1,981 $3,366 $21,388 the Transportation Element and distribution, because A planning level LOS analysis was conducted at the intersections of Saxon Drive /Andover Park East, South 180th Street/Andover Park East, and South 180th Street/Sperry Drive during the weekday p.m. peak hour and the weekend peak hour. The existing LOS conditions currently experienced at the three intersections range between LOS "A" and LOS "C ". By 1998, when the Costco gas station opens, the LOS at the three impacted intersections will range between LOS "A" and LOS "D ", with a maximum increase in the v/c ratio of 0.02. The LOS of the three intersections remains unchanged when the new project trips are added to the network, with a maximum 0.02 increase in the v/c ratio during some peak hours at some of the intersections. The mitigation defined at this time consists of a mitigation payment of $21,388 for project traffic entering specified intersections with required improvements as identified in the City's Transportation Element. 978091(11)Mia(09!17197):ss 13 ` u�� U O. U) W: W z' CA w o g Q: in D ' .f- W: z t-.. Z o` O D I- ;W W� I U !L - O; .z LIJ N ' O. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. • Because intersection capacity and traffic flow performance, or "level of service ", are prime factors in the process of developing and evaluating alternatives, a brief description is presented here for the benefit of the lay reader. The ratio of existing traffic volume to available capacity provides a measure of intensity of traffic loading relative to the ability of the street intersection to accommodate the traffic. The number of lanes, presence of turn lanes, type of traffic control, signal phasing, etc., are important factors determining capacity. As the volume /capacity (v /c) ratio approaches a value of 1.0, extreme congestion sets in, with long backups at signalized intersections and the passage of several complete changes of the signal cycles before a motorist can proceed. Motorists at stop -sign controlled intersection approaches face extremely long delays. As traffic queues lengthen, this congestion can also impede access to and from upstream abutting property. The term "level of service" is used to describe traffic flow at intersections. For signalized intersections, the level of service is essentially based on v/c ratios (see table A -1). Table A -1 Level of Service and Volume /Capacity Ratio Relationships for Signalized Intersections Level of Stopped Delay Intersection Service General Description (seconds /vehicle) V/C Ratio A Free flow <_ 5.0 <_ 0.60 B Stable flow (slight delays) 5.1 to 15.0 0.61 to 0.70 C Stable flow (acceptable delays) 15.1 to 25.0 0.71 to 0.80 D Approaching unstable flow 25.1 to 40.0 0.81 to 0.90 (tolerable delay - occasionally wait through more than one signal cycle before proceeding) E Unstable flow (intolerable delay, 40.1 to 60.0 0.91 to 1.00 intersection operating at capacity) F Forced flow (jammed) > 60.0 > 1.00 1. For detailed operational analysis method 2. For planning level analysis method Source: "Highway Capacity Manual ", Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 1994; and "Interim Materials on Highway Capacity ", Circular212, Transportation Research Board, 1980. 97809- 111appa- los.doc (07/14/97)\ kp LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPT A.1 z • w. 6 J tJ O 0 N 0 • 'W i J ~; CO' w:. O • =: (O • 1- w` z �. t- z t-: .) ; 0 —. w W, til Z . cn 0 F. z Level of service "A" is a condition of unimpeded flow, while level of service "C" is often used in the design of new urban streets as the lowest acceptable level for peak periods. Congestion begins to occur at level of service "D" (v /c from 0.81 to 0.90). Because of funding and/or environmental constraints for improvements, this level of service is being used by more and more cities as an adequate level, particularly for improvements to congested existing facilities. Increasingly unstable traffic flow with excessive delay and congestion occurs as level of service "E" (capacity) is approached (v /c = 0.91 to 1.00). For v/c > 1.00, level of service "F" (forced flow) is obtained, and the intersection is overloaded or is jammed due to traffic backups from overloaded downstream intersections. Table A -2 shows daily traffic volumes corresponding to peak -hour level of service C, D, and E (capacity) applicable to suburban arterial roadways of various numbers of lanes and configurations. Table A -2 Guidelines for Relating Average Weekday Daily Traffic Volumes to Peak -Hour Level of Service for Suburban Arterials of Various Roadway Lane Configurations Total Number of Lanes Lane Configuration Daily Two -Way Traffic Volume for Various Levels of Service! E C D (capacity) Two -Way Streets 2 Two Lanes 3 Two Lanes with Left-Turn Lane 4 Four Lanes 5 Four Lanes with Left-Turn Lane 6 Six Lanes 7 Six Lanes with Left-Turn Lane 8,000 10,000 16,000 21,000 25,000 31,000 11,000 14,000 23,000 29,000 36,000 45,000 13,000 16,000 26,000 32,000 39,000 49,000 One -Way Streets 2 Two Lanes 3 Three Lanes 4 Four Lanes 5 Five Lanes Signals per Mile 0.50 -2.49 Over 4.5 multiply by: multiply by: LOS C 1.55 Not Possible 12,000 19,000 23,000 29,000 1. The volumes represent maximums for the daily volume that will result in levels hours, with an average spacing of 2.5 to 4.5 signalized intersections per mile. signal spacings, multiply the above service volumes as follows: LOS D 1.16 0.87 17,000 27,000 33,000 42,000 19,000 29,000 36,000 45,000 of service indicated during peak For approximations at other LOS E 1.06 0.99 Prepared by Entranco based on data in the Florida Department of Transportation "Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual ", April 1992. 97809.11 kappa- los.doc (07114/97)1. kp A.2 a try 6 J U: U { 0) p. to w' w ='. J t` w O: g a` -d F =. w . z : F-0. z t w w ;O co .0 I—. I . V . U. O; LL! c o , O ': ;Z - It should be noted that equal v/c ratios at several locations do not necessarily indicate equal overall performance of intersections, since one location may experience a high v/c ratio for a considerable period of the day while at another the peak period is of short duration. In addition, a low level of service is more tolerable at a low- volume intersection than a high - volume location. The general level of service concept also holds for stop -sign controlled intersections, although the capacity of the stop -sign controlled approaches is less than that of the signalized intersection approach. Table A -3 shows the level of service criteria for unsignalized intersections. Capacity analysis for two -way stop -sign controlled intersections is based on the assumption that major street traffic is not affected by the minor street movements, and left -turns from the major streets to the minor streets are influenced only by opposing major street through flow. The level of service calculated for two -way stop intersections is therefore based on delay experienced by only the minor street movements and the major street left-turn movement. 97809- 11\appa- los.doc (07/14/97)\ kp Table A -3 Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections Average Total Delay (d) Level of Service d <_5 5 <d510 10 <d_ <20 20 <d <_30 30 <d <_45 d > 45 A.3 A B C D E F • Average total delay is measured in seconds per vehicle. • For level of service F, when demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. This condition usually warrants improvements to the intersection. Source: "Highway Capacity Manual ", Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 1994. z w 0' oO; CO C W w N w w o` • = d t- 0 z uj U I iQ --; w Id U. t.. z. U ' O z NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 1 Approach 31 3: LT= 28 I I 1 2:RT= 6 - TH= 173 I I I TH= 0 RT= 0 I v 1 LT= 8 ptersection: Saxon Drive /Andover Park East Problem Statement: CPF / SAXANDOA.NCP _ = = = = =L= = ==i===Z=2= Step 1. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY 1 Approach 3:Andover Park 1 2 1 1 I R L I N (a IRTTTLI THHHT Approach 1 < < I > > A - -RT 1 LT-- v v v < -RTH LTH-A> <--TH TH - -> <v-LTH RTH-v> A A A v--LT 2 RTH-v < < I > > Approach 2 L L T R R I T T H T T ISaxon Dr. 1K H I I 11 I I Approach 4:Andover Park 1 - Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph _.1 ._J Npproach 1 - -> - 1:LT= 0 1 A 14: RT= 13 TH= 0 I I I TH= 279 I RT= 0 I 1 1 LT= 0 I Approach 41 Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING _J J �1 - -> A3 1 v A • ) I I A3B4 ✓ > 1 A A3A4 ✓ I < -- A2B1 v -- A <-- Approach 2 81 v -- B3 <1 II A2 < -- A4 1 B2 - -A B4 1> Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK Approach : -1- -2- -3- -4- a.No. of change : 60 0 0 60 intervals /hour b.LT capacity on : 120 change (vph) c.G /C ratio : .5 d.Opposing volume : 6 in vph e.LT capacity on : 594 green (vph) f.LT capacity in : 714 vph (b+e) g.Left turn volume : 0 0 0 0 in vph h.Is volume > cap. : NO (g >f) ? Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph I I I I 882 778 III vv Approach 1 11 4311 6 3 3 I Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) 1 Approach 31 I I I I I I See Step 6b. I I 1 Approach 41 A- 6 v- 4 v- 4 Approach 2 NO: Design Hour: A.M. Peak Without Projec COMMENTS == ====== i= Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Possible Volume Adjusted Prob- Critical Carryover Critical able Volume to next Volume 0 0 120 Phase in vph phase in vph 0 0 .5 A384 28(84) 87- 28= 59(A3) 28 0 0 173 A3A4 146(A4) OR 59(A3) 146 A2B1 4(81) OR 0(A2) 4 0 0 427 0 0 547 Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 174(B4A4) +4(B1) +0() +0() = 178 vph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: IAI Step 9. RECALCULATE Exclusive right turns reduced 100 X V/C Ratio = .12 Intersection: Saxon Drive /Andover Park East Problem Statement: CPF / SAXAND6P.NCP __ Step 1. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY 1 Approach 3:Andover Park 1 2 1 1 1 R L 1 IRTTTLI THHHT Approach 1 < < 1 > > " - -RT 1 LT- v v v < LTH - ^ > <--TN TH - -> <v -LTH RTH-v> ^ ^ " v - -LT 2 RTH-v < < (i > Approach 2 LLTRR 1 T T H T T (Saxon Dr. ( H H I 1 11 1 1 Approach 4:Andover Park n/a Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph 1 Approach 31 3: LT= 226 1 1 1 2:RT= 61 TH= 452 1 1 I TN= 0 RT= 0 1 v 1 LT= 194 Approach 1 - -> 1 :LT= 0 1 " 1 4: RT= 202 TH= 0 1 1 1 TH= 302 RT= 0 1 1 1 LT= 0 1 Approach 41 Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING 1 1 A384 ✓ > 1 A A3A4 ✓ 1 < -- A281 v -- Al --> A3 1 81 v -- V A A2 < -- A4 I 82 --A A <-- Approach 2 63 <1 I I 84 I> Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK Approach : -1- -2- -3- -4- a.No. of change : 60 0 0 60 intervals /hour . b.LT capacity on : 120 0 0 120 change (vph) • c.G /C ratio : ▪ .5 0 0 .5 d.Opposing volume : 61 0 0 452 in vph e.LT capacity on : 539 0 0 148 green (vph) f.LT capacity in : 659 0 0 268 vph (b+e) g.Left turn volume : 0 0 0 0 in vph h.ls volume > cap. : NO NO (g >f) 7 Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph I I 1222 222 666 III VV> Approach 1 See Step 6b. I I I I I I 1 Approach 41 2 2 550 2021 Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) 1 Approach 31 I I I I I I A- 61 v- 87 v- 107 Approach 2 Design Hour: 1996 PM EXISTING Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Possible Volume Adjusted Prob- Critical Carryover Critical able Volume to next Volume Phase in vph phase in vph A3B4 226(84) 226- 226= 0(A3) 226 A3A4 252(A4) OR 0(A3) 252 A281 107(81) OR 43(A2) 107 Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 478(B4A4) +107(81) +0() +0() = 585 vph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: COMMENTS IAI Step 9. RECALCULATE Exclusive right turns reduced 30 X V/C Ratio = .41 Intersection: Saxon Drive /Andover Park East Problem Statement: CPF / SAXAND6S.NCP == Step 1. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY Approach 3:Andover Park 2 1 1 R L 1 N R I T T L I T H H H T Approach 1 < < I > > LT-- v v v N/A 1:LT= TH= RT= Al -> LTH-A> TH - -> RTH-v> Approach 1 - -> A A A == ______:__ Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING v-- A3 1 vA A2 < -- A4 1 A384 A3A4 A261 82 --A A A - -RT 1 <A -RTH < - -TH <v -LTH v - -LT 2 RT --v < < 1 > > Approach 2 LLTRR I T T H T T (Saxon Dr. I H H I 11 I 1 Approach 4:Andover Park Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph 1 Approach 31 3: LT= 218 1 1 1 2:RT= 82 TH= 212 I I I TH= 0 RT= 0 1 v 1 LT= 171 <-- Approach 2 0 1 A 1 4: RT= 227 0 1 1 1 TH= 164 G 1 1 l LT= 0 1 Approach 41 81 v -- B3 <1 II 84 1> Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 _ Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK Approach : -1- -2- -3- -4- a.No. of change : 60 0 0 60 intervals /hour . b.LT capacity on : 120 0 0 120 change (vph) c.G /C ratio : .5 0 0 .5 d.Opposing volume : 82 0 0 212 in vph e.LT capacity on : 518 0 0 388 green (vph) f.LT capacity in : 638 0 0 508 vph (b+e) g.Left turn volume : 0 0 0 0 in vph h.Is volume > cap. : NO NO (g >f) ? Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph 1 1112 001 668 III Vv> Approach 1 See Step 6b. I I I I 1 Approach 41 1 2 6 21 4071 Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) 1 Approach 31 A- 82 v- 77 v- 95 Approach 2 Design Hour: 1996 SATURDAY EXISTING Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Possible Volume Adjusted Prob- Critical Carryover Critical able Volume to next Volume Phase in vph phase in vph A384 218(84) 106- 218= 0(A3) 218 A3A4 227(A4) OR 0(A3) 227 A281 95(81) OR 57(A2) 95 Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 445(B4A4) +95(81) +0() +0() = 540 vph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Step 9. RECALCULATE Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: COMMENTS IAI Exclusive right turns reduced 30 X V/C Ratio = .38 Z Z ` 6 W. UO .NC CO W •. W S: 1 1 W LL < I- W Z � I O Z F— W W '. I— r '— — O .. Z;. - - O F* Z } tersection: South 180th Street /Andover rroblem Statement: CPF / 180ANDOA.NCP -- step 1. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY I Approach 3:Andover Park I1 1 A I R L I N 180th St. I RTTTL I T H H H T Approach 1 1 > > " - -RT 1 LT--A v v v <" -RTH 1 LTH- "> <- -TH 1 2 TH - -> <v -LTH RTH-v> v - -LT RTH-v < < I > > Approach 2 L L T R R T T H T T IS. 180th St H H Approach 4 :n /a r ^ f _ step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph Approach 31 5: LT= 99 I I 1 2:RT= 268 TH= 0 I I I TH= 573 RT= 35 I v I LT= 0 { " 1pproach 1 - -> ``1:LT= 70 TH= 621 -} RT= 0 step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING --> A3 I v " A2 < -- A4 I A A A < -- Approach 2 I " 14: RT= 0 I I I TH= 0 I I I LT= 0 I Approach 41 - -" A1B2 - -> < -- A1A2 I I A3B4 v > 81 v -- 83 <I I I 82 - -" B4 I> Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 Park East Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK a.No. of change intervals /hour b.LT capacity on change (vph) c.G /C ratio d.Opposing volume in vph e.LT capacity on green (vph) f.LT capacity in vph (b+e) g.Left turn volume in vph h.Is volume > cap. (g >f) ? 70 - " 311 -> 311 -> 1 I I Approach 1 See Step 6b. I i I I I I I Approach 41 Approach : -1- -2- -3- -4- 0 60 0 60 Prob- able 0 120 0 120 Phase 0 .5 0 .5 0 621 0 35 . 0 0 0 565 . 0 120 0 685 : 0 0 0 0 NO NO Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph I I 1 39 63 61, 1 5 9 c <+ 253 1 1 # <+ 153 < > <- 421 Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) I Approach 31 Approach 2 Design Hour: A.M. Peak Without Projec _ Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Possible Volume Adjusted Critical Carryover Critical Volume to next Volume in vph phase in vph A1B2 70(62) 311- 70= 241(A1) 70 A1A2 421(A2) OR 241(A1) 421 A3B4 99(84) OR 35(A3) (01' Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES (P1 491(B2A2)+0Q(64) +0() +0() Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Step 9. RECALCULATE Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: COMMENTS vph 55% IAI Exclusive right turns reduced 0 % V/C Ratio 0 . 3 ..: } Intersection: South 180th Street /Andover Park East Problem Statement: CPF / 180AND6P.NCP Step 1. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY 1 Approach 3:Andover Park I 1 I I R L I S. 180th St. (RTTTL I T H H H T Approach 1 < < 1 > > " - -RT 1 LT --" v v v <" -RTH 1 LTH - "> < - -TH 1 2 TH --> <v -LTH RTH-v> " " " v --LT RT - -v < < 1 > > Approach 2 L L T R R (T T H T T IS. 180th St I H H 1 I 1 1 Approach 4:n/a Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph 1 Approach 31 3: LT= 477 I I 1 2:RT= 372 TH= 0 I I 1 TH =1002 RT= 172 1 v 1 LT= 0 Approach 1 - -> 1:LT= 119 TH= 788 RT= 0 Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING - < -- A1A2 1 A3B4 A182 A N <-- Approach 2 1 " 1 4: RT= 0 I I I TH= 0 I I I LT= 0 1 Approach 41 81 v-- B3 <1 II Al - -> A3 1 v " A2 < -- A4 1 82 - -" 84 1> Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK Approach : -1- -2- -3- -4- a.No. of change : 0 60 0 60 intervals /hour b.LT capacity on : 0 120 0 120 change (vph) c.G /C ratio 0 .5 0 .5 d.Opposing volume : 0 788 0 172 in vph e.LT capacity on : 0 0 0 428 green (vph) f.LT capacity in : 0 120 0 548 vph (b+e) g.Left turn volume : 0 0 0 0 in vph h.Is volume > cap. : NO NO (g >f) 7 119 - 394 -> 394 -> Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph I 1 4 ' �1 •C I 2 7 J, 27 II Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) 1 Approach 31 Approach 1 See Step 6b. I I I I I I 1 Approach 41 "+ 372 <+ 315 <- 687 Approach 2 Design Hour: 1996 PM EXISTING COMMENTS _ Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Possible Volume Adjusted Prob- Critical Carryover Critical able Volume to next Volume Phase in vph phase in vph A182 119(B2) 394- 119= 275(A1) 119 A1A2 687(A2) OR 275(A1) 687 A3B4 477(B4) OR 120(A3) Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 3Z) 806(82A2)+ 84) +0() +0() Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: = vph f 13 I Step 9. RECALCULATE I C Exclusive right turns reduced 30 X V/C Ratio = Q ,i 37S Step 1. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY 1 Approach 3:Andover 11 11 I R L 1 N S. 180th St. I RTTTL 1 THHHT <<I>> • Intersection: South 180th Street /Andover Park East Problem Statement: CPF / 180AND6S.NCP Approach 1 1 LT - -" LTH - "> 2 TH - -> RTH -v> RT - -v vvv A A A <<1 > L L T R R 1 T T H T T IS. 180th St. I H H I 1 Approach 4:n /a A " - -RT <" -RTH 1 < - -TN 1 <v-LTH v --LT Approach 2 Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph 1 Approach 31 3: LT= 299 1 1 1 2:RT= 282 TH= 0 1 1 1 TH= 614 RT= 88 1 v 1 LT= 0 Approach 1 - -> 1:LT= 105 TH= 573 RT= 0 Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING A182 AIA2 Park <-- Approach 2 1 " 1 4: RT= 0 I 1 1 TH= 0 I 1 1 LT= 0 1 Approach 41 1 1 A384 v > Al - -> A3 1 81 v -- 83 <1 v I I A2 < -- A4 1 B2 --" B4 1> Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK Approach : -1- -2- -3- -4- a.No. of change 0 60 0 60 intervals /hour b.LT capacity on 0 120 0 120 change (vph) c.G /C ratio 0 .5 0 .5 d.Opposing volume : 0 573 0 88 in vph e.LT capacity on : 0 27 0 512 green (vph) f.LT capacity in 0 147 0 632 vph (b+e) g.Left turn volume : 0 0 0 0 in vph h.Is volume > cap. : NO NO (g >f) 7 Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, 1 8 9 113 11 4-- 105 -" 287 -> 287 -> Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) 1 Approach 31 I I I I I I Approach 1 See Step 6b. I I I I I I 1 Approach 41 in vph "+ 282 <+ 166 < 448 Approach 2 Design Hour: 1996 SATURDAY EXISTING Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Possible Volume Prob- Critical Carryover able Volume to next Phase in vph phase A182 A1A2 A3B4 Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: Step 9. RECALCULATE COMMENTS _ 105(82) 287- 105= 182(A1) 105 448(A2) OR 182(A1) 448 39904) OR 62(A3) 9'I Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES ( 553(B2A2) +29(84) +0() +0() _t5'f-vph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) I AI Exclusive right turns reduced 30 X V/C Ratio = , () , �j •Z Adjusted Critical Volume in vph J ltersection: South 180th Street /Sperry Drive Problem Statement: CPF / 180SPEOA.NCP _ _ itep 1. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY { Approach 3:Oriveway ) 1 1 ) A ) R L ) N ' 180th St. ) RTTTL ) T H H H T Approach 1 < <) > > A - -RT 1 LT--A v v v <A -RTH 1 LTH-A> <- -TH 1 1 TH--> <v -LTH 1 RTH A A A v - -LT 1 RT --v < <) > > Approach 2 L L T R R { T T H T T )S. 180th St ) H H ) )1 11) _j ) Approach 4:Sperry Dr. t tep 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph j 1 Approach 31 is LT= 31 I ) ) 2:RT= 67 TH= 0 ) ) { TH= 886 RT= 7 ) v ) LT= 25 Ipproach 1 - -> 1::LT= 10 { A 1 4: RT= 4 _i TH= 696 ) { I TH= 0 1 RT= 21 ) ) ) LT= 4 ) Approach 41 ?tep 3. IDENTIFY PHASING - -" v -- B281 --A AND < -- A1B2 AND --> OR v-- /OR A2B1 - -> < -- A1A2 _ ) ) AND < " A3B4 AND V > OR { ) /OR A483 <-- Approach 2 --> A3 ) 81 v -- 83 <) A I A2 < -- A4 ) B2 - -" 84 )> Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK Approach : -1- -2- -3- -4- a.No. of change 0 0 60 60 intervals /hour b.LT capacity on 0 change (vph) c.G /C ratio 0 0 .5 .5 d.Opposing volume : 0 0 4 7 in vph e.LT capacity on 0 0 596 593 green (vph) f.LT capacity in 0 0 716 713 vph (b+e) g.Left turn volume : 0 0 31 4 in vph h.Is volume > cap. : NO NO (g >f) Z Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph { { 10 - 359 -> 338 +> 21 +v Approach 1 { 3 701 ) ++ <v> < A > > ) + + ) 4022) 0 120 120 Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) { Approach 3) { { { { { { See Step 6b. { { { { Approach 41 Approach 2 Design Hour: A.M. Peak Without Projec z= s ==sam= A+ 67 <+ 410 <- 477 v- 25 Prob- able Phase Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Adjusted Critical Volume in vph COMMENTS Possible Critical Volume in vph Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: { A ) Step 9. RECALCULATE Volume Carryover to next phase B2B1 10(82) 25- 10= 15(81) 10 A2B1 15(81) 477- 15= 462(A2) 15 A1A2 462(A2) OR 359(A1) 462 A4B3 33(A4 +84) OR 9(A3 +B3) 33 Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 25(8281) +462(A2) +33(A4134) +0() = 520 vph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Exclusive right turns reduced 30 % V/C Ratio = .38 Z re W om ; W � JO '0 0. .N W: W =: W; W 0: u_ D di I Z . I— 0 Z I—; .111 ut : I- V; O : • Z: •U = 0 ~; Z } Intersection: South 180th Street /Sperry Drive Problem Statement: CPF / 180SPE6P.NCP Step 1. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY 1 Approach 3:Driveway 11 1 1 I R L 1 S. 180th St. IRTTTL I T H H H T Approach 1 < < 1 > > ^ - -RT 1 LT-- v v v <" -RTH 1 LTH - "> < - -TH 1 1 TH - -> <v -LTH 1 RTH -v> " " " v - -LT 1 RT - -v < < 1 > > Approach 2 LLTRR 1 T T H T T IS. 180th St I H H I 11 11 . 1 1 Approach 4:Sperry Dr. A N Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph 1 Approach 31 3: LT= 102 1 1 1 2:RT= 96 TH= 0 1 1 1 TH =1259 RT= 31 1 v 1 LT= 11 Approach 1 - -> 1:LT= 37 TH =1228 RT= 3 == Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING - v -- 8281 --A AND < -- A182 AND --> OR v -- /OR A281 - -> < -- A1A2 1 1 AND < " A384 AND v > OR 1 1 /OR A483 Al - -> A3 1 vA A2 < -- A4 1 <-- Approach 2 I " 1 4: RT= 33 1 1 1 TH= 4 1 1 1 LT= 48 1 Approach 41 81 v -- 83 <1 11 82 - -" 84 1> Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK a.No. of change intervals /hour b.LT capacity on change (vph) c.G /C ratio d.Opposing volume in vph e.LT capacity on green (vph) f.LT capacity in vph (b+e) g.left turn volume in vph h.Is volume > cap. (g>f) ? Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph 37 -A 616 -> 613 +> 3 +v 1 1 1 3 0 102 + + <v> Approach 1 : - 1- : 0 0 : 0 0 : 0 0 0 See Step 6b. < I + +I 4 111 84591 Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) 1 Approach 31 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Approach 41 Approach -2- -3- -4- 0 60 60 0 120 120 O .5 .5 0 37 31 0 563 569 o 683 689 0 102 48 NO NO "+ 96 <+ 582 <- 678 v- 11 Approach 2 Design Hour: 1996 PM EXISTING Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Possible Volume Adjusted Prob- Critical Carryover Critical able Volume to next Volume Phase in vph phase in vph B261 11(81) 37- 11= 26(82) 11 A182 26(82) 616- 26= 590(A1) 26 A1A2 678(A2) OR 590(A1) 678 A483 121(A4 +84) OR 69(A3 +83) 121 Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 37(8182) +678(A2) +121(A4B4) +0() = 836 vph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) IBI Step 9. RECALCULATE Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: COMMENTS Exclusive right turns reduced 33 X V/C Ratio = .61 z l Z re Wes' —J C.) 00 N W = '. J N LL; W D. _ a , i... W. _. Z Z 0 .. uj C .) ) 0 ; 0 I - WUJ I Z .. W co o � z '� ;� _ -- Intersection: South 180th Street /Sperry Drive Problem Statement: CPF / 180SPE6S.NCP Step 1. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY 1 Approach 3:Driveway Ii 1 1 I R L 1 N S. 180th St.,I R T T T L I T H H H T Approach 1 < < 1 > > 1 LT-- v v v LTH - ^> 1 TN - -> 1 RTH -v> RT--v < < 1 > > Approach 2 L L T R R 1 TTHTT 1S. 180th St 1 H H I 11 111 1 Approach 4 :Sperry Dr. Approach 1 - -> 1:LT= 54 TH= 807 RT= 2 A A A Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING - B281 =s== === --^ AND < -- A182 AND --> OR v-- /OR A281 - -> < -- A1A2 ' 1 1 AND < ^ A384 AND v > OR 1 1 /OR A4B3 A A_-RT < -RTH 1 < - -TH 1 <v-LTH v - -LT 1 Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph 1 Approach 31 3: LT= 104 1 1 1 2:RT= 119 TH= 1 1 1 I TH= 827 RT= 74 1 v 1 LT= 0 <-- Approach 2 1 ^ 14:RT= 8 1 1 1 TH= 5 1 1 1 LT= 5 1 Approach 41 Al - -> A3 1 81 v -- 83 <1 I I A2 < -- A4 1 82 - -^ 84 1> _ Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK Approach -1- -2- -3- -4- a.No. of change : 0 0 60 60 intervals /hour b.LT capacity on : 0 0 120 120 change (vph) c.G /C ratio : 0 0 .5 .5 d.Opposing volume : 0 0 13 75 in vph e.LT capacity on : 0 0 587 525 green (vph) f.LT capacity in 0 0 707 645 vph (b+e) g.Left turn volume : 0 0 104 5 in vph h.Is volume > cap. : (g >f) T Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph 54 - 405 -> 403 +> 2 +v 1 7 0 4 14 I ++ < v > Approach 1 See Step 6b. I I i I I I 1 Approach 41 55271 Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) 1 Approach 31 ^+ 119 <+ 354 <- 473 v- 0 Approach 2 Design Hour: 1996 SATURDAY EXISTING Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Possible Volume Adjuster Prob- Critical Carryover Critical able Volume to next Volume Phase in vph phase in vph 8281 A182 AIA2 A4B3 NO NO Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 54(8182) +473(A2) +111(A484) +0() = 638 vph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Step 9. RECALCULATE Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: COMMENTS 0(81) 54- 0= 54(82) 0 54(82) 405- 54= 351(A1) 54, 473(A2) OR 351(A1) 473; 111(A4 +84) OR 57(A3 +83) 111 I AI Exclusive right turns reduced 30 X V/C Ratio = .46 • Z W WO : VO: (0 'WILY J H. N W W J • U- =. 1W Z I-', I- O •Z I' 2 D. D O. +O N' W u). H • .. Z. U N` O • Z _ — 1 Approach 31 3: LT= 231 1 1 1 2:RT= 62 TH= 461 1 1 1 TH= 0 RT= 0 1 v 1 LT= 198 Intersection: Saxon Drive /Andover Park East Problem Statement: CPF / SAXAND8P.NCP Step'1. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY 1 Approach 3:Andover Park I 2 11 A I R L 1 N n/a 1RTTTL I T H H H T Approach 1 < < 1 > > A - -RT 1 LT - -A v v v < -RTH LTH -A> < - -TN TH - -> <v -LTH RTH -v> A A A v - -LT 2 RT - -v < < 1 >.> Approach 2 L L T R R I T T H T T (Saxon Dr. 1 H H 1 I 11 I 1 Approach 4:Andover Park Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph Approach 1 - -> Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING 1 1 A3B4 v > A A3A4 v i < -- A2B1 v -- A2 < -- <-- Approach 2 1 :LT= 0 1 A l 4: RT= 206 TH= 0 1 1 1 TH= 308 RT= 0 I I I LT= 0 1 Approach 41 A3 1 81 v -- 83 <1 V A I I A4 1 82 - -A B4 1> + Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 Design Hour: 1998 PM 11/0 PROJECT Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR Approach MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP -1- -2- -3- -4- Possible Volume Adjusted a.No. of change : 60 0 0 60 Prob- Critical Carryover Critical intervals /hour able Volume to next Volume b.LT capacity on : 120 0 0 120 Phase in vph phase in vph change (vph) c.G /C ratio : .5 0 0 .5 A384 231(84) 231- 231= 0(A3) 231 d.Opposing volume : 62 0 0 461 A3A4 257(A4) OR 0(A3) 257 in vph A281 109(51) OR 43(A2) 109 e.LT capacity on : 538 0 0 139 green (vph) f.LT capacity in : 658 0 0 259 vph (b+e) g.left turn volume.: 0 0 0 0 in vph h.ls volume > cap. : NO NO: (g >f) ? 1 + - Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph I I 1222 I 333 1 1 1 A- 62 I I I v- 89 vv v- 109 Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) 1 Approach 31 Approach•1 See Step 6b. I I I I I I 1 Approach 41 2 2 5 5 0 1 71 "61 Approach 2 Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 488(B4A4) +109(81) +0() +0() = 597 vph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: COMMENTS IAI Step 9. RECALCULATE Exclusive right turns reduced 30 X V/C Ratio = .42 .......`...-- ...�:�.` �;.. -, Et W QQ D . U CO 0 W = —I F. CO IL W O Q .: Nd . H =, Z I- 0 Z I— uj co, 0 I — '" 11JWl z , co i 0 I- z Intersection: Saxon Drive /Andover Park Problem Statement: CPF / SAXAND8S.NCP = = = ==s = == ==________ = = = = =ss=s = == Step 1.. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY 1 Approach 3:Andover Park 1 . 2 11 R L I N IRTTTLI T H H H T Approach 1 < < I > > LT - -" v v v N/A _ Approach 1 - -> 1:LT= TH= RT= Step 3. LTH - "> TH - -> RTH -v> RT - -v v V < - -TH <v -LTH " A " v - -LT 2 < < I > > Approach 2 L L T R R I T T H T T Saxon Dr. I H H I 11 1 1 Approach 4:Andover Park ________________________ Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph 1 Approach 31 3: LT= 222 1 1 1 2:RT= 84 TH= 216 1 1 1 TH= 0 RT= 0 1 v 1 LT= 174 0 I " 1 4: RT= 232 0 1 1 1 TH= 167 0 1 1 1 LT= 0 1 Approach 41 == = = === == === =__= = === = = = ==== = = == IDENTIFY PHASING A3B4 A3A4 A2B1 A "--RT 1 <^ -RTH <-- Approach 2 Al - -> A3 1 81 v -- B3 <1 V " I I A2 < -- A4 1 82 - -" 84 1> East Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 __ _____ Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK a.No. of change intervals /hour b.LT capacity on change (vph) c.G /C ratio d.Opposing volume in vph e.LT capacity on green (vph) f.LT capacity in vph (b+e) g.left turn volume in vph h.Is volume > cap. (g >f) ? __ = = =__= = = = =_____ Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph 1112 002 882 _ 111 Vv> Approach 1 See Step 6b. Approach : -1- -2- -3- -4- : 60 0 0 60 Prob- able : 120 0 0 120 Phase .5 0 0 .5 : 84 0 0 216 : 516 0 0 384 : 636 0 0 504 : 0 0 0 0 NO NO I I I I I I 1 Approach 41 1 2 6 3 1 7021 Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) 1 Approach 31 A. 84 v- 78 v- 96 Approach 2 Design Hour: 1998 SATURDAY W/0 PROJEC _ Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP COMMENTS Possible Critical Volume in vph A384 222(B4) 108- 222= 0(A3) 222 A3A4 232(A4) OR 0(A3) 232 A2B1 96(61) OR 59(A2) 96 Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 454(B4A4)+96(B1) +0() +0() = 550 vph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: IAI Step 9. RECALCULATE Volume Carryover to 'next phase Adjusted Critical Volume in vph Exclusive right turns reduced 30 X V/C Ratio = .39 '. Z = i • : 0 c co 0 W UJ , J H' 05 U_ q u. 512 d _ ' Z _ i .. H 0 •. Z I—; LLI w; U 0; ,0 H; = V . o: z; 0 L Z C } • � Approach 1 - -> 1:LT= 121 TH= 804 RT= 0 Step 1. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY 1 Approach 3:Andover Park 1i. 1 1 I R L I N S. 180th St. I'R.T T T L 1 THHHT Approach 1 < < 1 > > A - -RT 1 LT -- v v v < -RTH 1 LTH- ^ > <--TH 1 2 TH - -> <v -LTH RTH-v> A ^ ^ v - -LT RT - -v < < 1 > > Approach 2 LLTRR 1 T T H T T IS. 180th St. I H H I 1 I 1 Approach 4:n /a Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph 1 Approach 31 3: LT= 487 1 1 1 2:RT= 379 TH= 0 1 1 1 TH =1022 RT= 175 1 v 1 LT= 0 1 ^ 1 4: RT= 0 I 1 1 TH= 0 1 1 1 LT= 0 1 Approach 41 __________________________ Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING A182 - -> < -- A1A2 1 1 A364 v > <-- Approach 2 Al --> A3 1 81 v -- 83 <1 v ^ A2 < -- A4 1 82 84 1> I I Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 Intersection: South 180th Street /Andover Park East Problem Statement: CPF / 180AND8P.NCP _______________________________ ____________ ___ __________= Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK a.No. of change intervals /hour b.LT capacity on change (vph) c.G /C ratio d.Opposing volume in vph e.LT capacity on green (vph) f.LT capacity in vph (b+e) g.Left turn volume in vph h.Is volume > cap. (9 >f) ? 121 A 402 -> 402 -> 114 78 57 Approach 1 331 331 See Step 6b. Approach MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP -1- -2- -3- -4- Possible Volume Adjusted 0 60 0 60 Prob- Critical Carryover Critical able Volume to'next Volume . 0 120 0 120 Phase in vph phase in vph 0 .5 0 .5 AIB2 121(82) 402- 121= 281(A1) 121 A1A2 701(A2) OR 281(A1) 701 A384 (84) OR 123(A3) . 0 804 0 175 0 0 0 425 . 0 120 0 545 0 0 0 0 NO Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) 1 Approach 31 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Approach 41 ^+ 379 <+ 322 <-701 Approach 2 NO Design Hour: 1998 PM W/0 PROJECT Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR '?3I Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 33) 822(82A2)+ 84)+00+00 X53 =vph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Step 9. RECALCULATE Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: COMMENTS I >I Exclusive right turns reduced 30 % V/c Ratio = 3pKI 0.3 ) ._......��. ...... Intersection: South 180th Street /Andover Problem Statement: CPF / 180AND8S.NCP Step 1. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY 1 Approach 3:Andover Park 1 1 1 1 R L I N S. 180th St. I RTTTL 1 •THHHT Approach 1 c < 1 > > ^ - -RT 1 LT - -^ v v v <^ -RTH 1 LTH - < - -TH 1 2 TH--> <v-LTH RTH -v> ^ ^ ^ v - -LT RT - -v < < 1 > > Approach 2 LLTRR 1 TTHTT IS. 180th St I H H I 1 Approach 4 :n /a Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph 1 Approach 31 3: LT= 305 1 1 1 2:RT= 288 TH= 0 1 1 1 TH= 626 RT= 90 1 v 1 LT= 0 Approach 1 --> 1:LT= 107 TH= 585 RT= 0 Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING Al - -> A182 - -> < -- A1A2 1 1 A3B4 v > A3 1 v^ A2 < -- A4 1 A < -- Approach 2 I ^ 1 4: RT= 0 I 1 1 TH= 0 I 1 1 LT= 0 1 Approach 41 81 v -- 83 <1 II 82 - -^ B4 1> Park 107 -^ 293 -> 293 -> Calculation Form 1 East Design Hour: 1998 SAT W/0 PROJECT Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK Approach : -1- -2- -3- -4- a.No. of change 0 ,60 0 60 intervals /hour : b.LT capacity on 0 120 0 120 change (vph) c.G /C ratio : 0 .5 0 .5 d.Opposing volume in vph e.LT capacity on green (vph) f.LT capacity in vph (b+e) g.Left turn volume in vph h.Is volume > cap. (g >f) 7 Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph I I 3 90 01 ( . II L ^+ 288 <+ 169 <- 457 Approach 2 Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Possible Volume Adjusted Prob- able Phase A1B2 107(82) 293- 107= 186(A1) 107 A1A2 457(A2) OR 186(A1) 457 A3B4 84) OR 63(A3) >35: Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 564 (82A2) +)' 05 84) +0 () +O( ) _KvPh Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Step 9. RECALCULATE Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: COMMENTS Critical Volume in vph Carryover to next phase I Critical Volume in vph Exclusive right turns reduced 30 % V/C Ratio = 0. S Z Q • m'. J U .0 O' co of W =; -� I —: N LL ? w O , Z 1- U U, O a 0 H W W' O: v co: . Intersection: South 180th Street /Sperry Problem Statement: CPF / 180SPE8P.NCP Step 1. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY 1 Approach 3:Driveway II 1 1 1 R L 1 N S. 180th St. (•R,T T T L 1 T H H H T Approach 1 < < ( > > A - -RT 1 LT - - v v v < ^ -RTH 1 LTH- ^ > < - -TH 1 1 TH--> <v -LTH 1 RTH-v> ^ ^ ^ v- -LT 1 RT --v < < 1 > > Approach 2 LLTRR I T T H T T IS. 180th St I H H I 1 1 111 1 Approach 4:Sperry Dr. Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph 1 Approach 31 3: LT= 104 I I 1 2:RT= 98 TH= 0 1 1 I TH =1284 RT= 32 1 v 1 LT= 11 Approach 1 - -> 1:LT= 38 TH =1253 RT= 3 ^ 1 4: RT= 34 1I TH= 4 I 1 1 LT= 49 1 Approach 41 Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING - v-- 8281 --A AND < -- A1B2 AND --> OR v-- /OR A281 - -> < -- A1A2 1 1 AND < ^ A384 AND v > OR 1 1 /0R A483 ^ <-- Approach 2 Al - -> A3 1 81 v -- 83 <1 (I A2 < -- A4 1 82 - 84 1> Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 Drive Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK Approach -1- -2- -3- -4- a.No. of change : 0 0 60 60 intervals /hour b.LT capacity on : 0 0 120 120 change (vph) c.G /C ratio - 0 0 .5 .5 8281 11(81) 38- 11= 27(82) 11 d.Opposing volume : 0 0 38 32 A1B2 27(62) 628- 27= 601(A1) 27 in vph - A1A2 691(A2) OR 601(A1) 691 e.LT capacity on : 0 0 562 568 A463 123(A4 +B4) OR 71(A3 +B3) 123 green (vph) f.LT capacity in : 0 0 682 688 vph (b+e) g.Left turn volume : 0 0 104 49 in vph h.Is volume > cap. : (g >f) ? Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph 38 -^ 628 -> 625 +> 3 +v 1 1 3 0 204 Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) 1 Approach 31 I I I I I I Approach 1 I + + < v > See Step 6b. I I I I I I I Approach 41 < ^ > > 1 + + I _ 4 111 94591 NO NO: I ^+ 98 <+ 593 <- 691 v- 11 Approach 2 == Design Hour: 1998 PM W/0 PROJECT Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Possible Volume Adjusted Prob- Critical Carryover Critical able Volume to next Volume Phase in vph phase in vph _ I Step 9. RECALCULATE Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: COMMENTS Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 38(6182) +691(A2) +123(A4B4) +0() = 852 vph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Exclusive right turns reduced 32 % V/C Ratio = .62 } 1:LT= 55 1 A 1 4: RT= 8 } TH= 823 1 1 1 TH= 5 RT= 2 ( 1 1 LT= 5 - 1 Approach 41 Intersection: South 180th Street /Sperry Drive Problem Statement: CPF / 180SPE8S.NCP Step 1., IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY 1 Approach 3:Driveway 1 1 I I R L 1 N S. 180th St. IRTTTL 1 T H H H T Approach 1 < < 1 > > ^ - - RT 1 LT - -^ v v v < ^ -RTN 1 LTH - ^> < - -TH 1 1 TN - -> • <v -LTH 1 RTH -v> A A A v - -LT 1 RT - -v < < 1 > > Approach 2 L L T R R ITTHTT IS. 180th St 1 H H 1 1 1 I I I 1 Approach 4:Sperry Dr. Approach 1 --> ^ Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph 1 Approach 31 3: LT= 106 1 1 1 2:RT= 121 TH= 1 I I I TH= 844 RT= 75 1 v 1 LT= 0 Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING - -^ v -- 8281 - AND < -- A1B2 AND - -> OR v -- /OR A281 -> < -- A1A2 1 1 AND < ^ A384 AND v > OR 1 1 /OR A4B3 <-- Approach 2 Al - -> A3 1 81 v -- 83 <1 v ^ A2 < -- A4 1 82 - -^ 84 1> == zz= zszze= zasazezza= azzas = =az= I I Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK Approach -1- -2- -3- -4- a.No. of change 0 0 60 60 intervals /hour b.LT capacity on 0 0 120 120 change (vph) c.G /C ratio 0 0 .5 .5 d.Opposing volume : 0 0 13 76 in vph e.LT'capacity on 0 0 587 524 green (vph) f.LT capacity in 0 0 707 644 vph (b+e) g.Left turn volume : 0 0 106 5 in vph h.ls volume > cap. : NO NO (g >f) ? Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph I I 1 7 0 5 1 6 55 -^ 413 -> 411 +> 2 +v 1+ Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) 1 Approach 31 I I I I Approach 1 See Step 6b. I I I I 1 Approach 41 < ^ >> I + + I 55271 ^+ 121 <+ 362 <- 483 v- 0 Approach 2 Design Hour: 1998 SAT W/0 PROJECT Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Possible Volume Adjusted Prob- Critical Carryover Critical able Volume to•next Volume Phase in vph phase in vph 8281 0(81) 55- 0= 55(82) 0 A162 55(82) 413- 55= 358(A1) 55 A1A2 483(A2) OR 358(A1) 483 A4B3 113(A4 +84) OR 6(A3 +B3) 113 Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 55(B182) +483(A2) +113(A484) +0() = 651 vph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: COMMENTS IAI Step 9. RECALCULATE Exclusive right turns reduced 100 % V/C Ratio = .47 Intersection: Saxon Drive /Andover Park East Problem Statement: CPF / SAXANOWP.NCP Step 1.. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY Approach 3:Andover Park 2 11 n/a Approach 1 LT - -^ LTH - ^> TH - -> RTH -v> RT --v A A R L 1 R T T T L T H H H T < < (> > ^ - -RT 1 v v v <^ -RTH < - -TH <v -LTH v - -LT 2 < < 1 > > Approach 2 LLTRR T T H T T 1Saxon Dr. H H 11 Approach 4:Andover Park N Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph Approach 31 3: LT= 244 1 1 1 2:RT= 74 TH= 461 1 1 1 TH= 0 RT= 0 1 v 1 LT= 210 Approach 1 - -> Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING I A384 • A A3A4 ✓ I Al - -> A3 v A2 <-- A4 < -- A281 v -- <-- Approach 2 1:LT= 0 1 ^ 1 4: RT= 217 TH= 0 1 1 1 TH= 308 RT= 0 1 1 1 LT= 0 Approach 41 81 v -- B3 <1 B2 - -^ 84 1> Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK Approach : -1- -2- -3- -4- a.No. of change : 60 0 0 60 intervals /hour . b.LT capacity on : 120 0 0 120 change (vph) c.G /C ratio . .5 0 0 .5 d.Opposing volume : 74 0 0 461 in vph e.LT capacity on : 526 0 0 139 green (vph) f.LT capacity in : 646 0 0 259 vph (b#e) g.Left turn volume : 0 0 0 0 in vph h.ls volume > cap. : NO (g >f) ? Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph 2 2 2 334 114 III vv> Approach 1 See Step 6b. I Approach 41 1+ 2 2 641 3 6 7 Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) Approach 31 I I I I ^- 74 v- 95 v- 116 Approach 2 Design Hour: 1998 PM W/ GAS & OPTICAL Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Prob- able Phase NO Possible Critical Volume in vph Volume Carryover to'next phase A364 244(64) 231- 244= 0(A3) 244 A3A4 263(A4) OR 0(A3) 263 A261 116(61) OR 52(A2) 116 Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 507(84A4) +116(81) +0() +0() = 623 vph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Step 9. RECALCULATE Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: COMMENTS A Exclusive right turns reduced 30 X V/C Ratio = .44 Adjusted Critical Volume in vph Z 1 W ; 6 U O uj W O ; g u. CO d I— W . I Z0 LIJ U • 0` 'CI I— 2 W H -- W Z ` 0 �' C Intersection: Saxon Drive /Andover Park East Problem Statement: CPF / SAXANOWS.NCP Step 1._IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY I Approach 3:Andover Park 1 2 1 1 I R L I N/A I R T T T L I T N H N T Approach 1 < < 1 > > ^ - -RT 1 LT - -A v v v <A -RTH LTH - ^> < - -TH TH - -> . <v-LTH RTH -v> A A A v--LT 2 RT - -v < < 1 > > Approach 2 LLTRR I T T H T T 1Saxon Dr. I H H I I 11 I 1 Approach 4:Andover Park Approach 1 - -> Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING 1 1 A384 ✓ > I A A3A4 ✓ 1 < -- A2B1 v -- Al - -> A3 1 81 v -- v ^ A2 < -- A4 1 82 - -^ A N Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph 1 Approach 31 3: LT= 233 1 1 1 2:RT= 98 TH= 216 1 1 1 TH= 0 RT= 0 1 v 1 LT= 184 <-- Approach 2 1:LT= 0 1 A 1 4: RT= 244 TH= 0 1 1 1 TH= 167 RT= 0 1 1 1 LT= 0 1 Approach 41 B3 <I I I 84 1> + Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 = =L= = = = = =_ ____ ________ ___ Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK Approach : -1- -2- -3- -4- a.No. of change : 60 0 0 60 intervals /hour b.LT capacity on : 120 0 0 120 change (vph) • c.G /C ratio : ▪ .5 0 0 .5 d.Opposing volume : 98 0 0 216 in vph e.LT capacity on : 502 0 0 384 green (vph) f.LT capacity in : 622 0 0 504 vph (b+e) • g.Left turn volume : 0 0 0 0 in vph h.Is volume > cap. : NO (9 >f) ? Step S. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph I I 1112 I 003 883 III .VV 1 2 6 4 1 7041 Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) 1 Approach 31 I I I I I I Approach 1 See Step 6b. A- 98 v- 83 v- 101 Approach 2 NO: I Design Hour: 1998 SAT W/ GAS 8 OPTICA == === Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Possible Volume Adjusted Prob- Critical Carryover Critical able Volume to , next Volume Phase in vph phase in vph A384 233(84) 108- 233= 0(A3) 233 A3A4 244(A4) OR 0(A3) 244 A281 101(81) OR 69(A2) 101 Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 477(B4A4) +101(81) +0() +0() = 578 vph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) IAI Step 9. RECALCULATE Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: COMMENTS Exclusive right turns reduced 30 % V/C Ratio = .41 - z. ~ W W 0', _J 0 C)0: U) W J N LL: W 0. co D. = C3 . O' .z1- L1J w: !O N; 0 I— W W H ; u-O • •0 H . z 1 Intersection: South 180th Street /Andover Park East ProblemiStatement: CPF / 180ANDWP.NCP Step 1.. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY I Approach 3:Andover Park 1I A R L I N T T T L I I I I I H T Approach 1 < < I > > A - -RT 1 LT - -A v v v <A -RTH 1 LTH- ^> < - -TH 1 2 TH - -> <v-LTH RTH-v> v - -LT RT - -v < < 1 > > Approach 2 L L T R R I T T N T T IS. 180th St I H H I I 1 S. 180th St. I R T A A A I Approach 4:n /a Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph I Approach 31 3: LT= 496 1 1 1 2:RT= 387 TH= 0 1 I I TH =1022 RT= 178 1 v 1 LT= 0 Approach 1 - -> 1:LT= 124 TH= 804 RT= 0 Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING A182 - -> < -- A1A2 1 1 A364 v > <-- Approach 2 I A 1 4: RT= 0 I I I TH= 0 I I I LT= 0 I Approach 41 Al --> A3 I v^ A2 < -- A4 1 82 - -^ 81 v -- 83 <I II 84 I> Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK Approach : -1- -2- -3- -4- 0 60 0 60 a.No. of change intervals /hour b.LT capacity on 0 120 change (vph) c.G /C ratio 0 d.Opposing volume : 0 in vph e.LT capacity on 0 green (vph) f.LT capacity in 0 120 vph (b+e) g.Left turn volume : 0 0 in vph h.ls volume > cap. : NO (g >f) ? Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph 124 402 -> 402 -> 1 1 1 4 79 86 3 33 } 1 -) .5 0 .5 804 0 178 0 0 422 Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) 1 Approach 31 i I I I I I Approach 1 See Step 6b. I I I I I I I Approach 41 0 120 0 542 0 0 NO ^+ 387 <+ 318 <- 705 Approach 2 Design Hour: 1998 PM W/ GAS It OPTICAL Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Possible Volume Prob- Critical Carryover able Volume to next Phase in vph phase Adjusted Critical Volume in vph A182 124(82) 402- 124= 278(A1) 124 A1A2 705(A2) OR 278(A1) 705 A364 ;96(B4) OR 125(A3) COMMENTS 33R- 733- Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 331 - 829(B2A2) + X84) +0() +0() i t' Step 9. RECALCULATE Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: Ph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Exclusive right turns reduced 30 X V/C Ratio = 0, $ L ..... c • Intersection: South 180th Street /Andover Park East Problem Statement: CPF / 180ANOWS.NCP Step 1. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY I Approach 3:Andover Park I 1I I R L I N S. 180th St. I RTTTL I •THHHT Approach 1 < < ( > > " - -RT 1 LT - -" v v v < " -RTH 1 LTH -"> < - -TH 1 2 TH- -> <v -LTH RTH-v> " " " . v - -LT RT - -v < < I > > Approach 2 LLTRR ITTHTT IS. 180th St IHH1 I Approach 4:n/a Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph I Approach 31 3: LT= 314 I I 12:RT= 296 TH= 0 I I I TH= 626 RT= 93 I v I LT= 0 Approach 1 - -> 1:LT= 110 TH= 585 RT= 0 Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING I I A384 v > v " A182 A1A2 " <-- Approach 2 I " 1 4: RT= 0 I I I TH= 0 I I 1 LT= 0 I Approach 41 Al - -> A3 I 81 v -- B3 <1 I I A2 < -- A4 I B2 - -" 84 I> Calculation Form 1 Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK Approach : -1- -2- -3- -4- a.No. of change 0 60 0 60 intervals /hour . b.LT capacity on 0 120 0 120 change (vph) c.G /C ratio 0 .5 0 .5 d.Opposing volume : 0 585 0 93 in vph e.LT capacity on 0 15 0 507 green (vph) f.LT capacity in 0 135 0 627 vph (b4e) • g.Left turn volume i in vph h.Is volume > cap. : (g >f) 7 Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph I I 3 9 1 ?.v3 0 4- 34 ,i, 110 " 293 -> 293 -> I I Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) I Approach 31 Approach 1 See Step 6b. I I I I I I I Approach 41 0 0 0 0 NO NO "+ 296 <+ 165 <- 461 Approach 2 Design Hour: 1998 SAT W/ GAS & OPTICA Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Possible Volume Adjusted Prob- Critical Carryover Critical able Volume to next Volume Phase in vph phase in vph A182 110(82) 293- 110= 183(A1) 110 A1A2 461(A2) OR 183(A1) 461 A384 )Z84) OR 65(A3) COMMENTS 7c4— . 20q- Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 7c4 571(B2A2) +j64) +0() +0() ) � Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Step 9. RECALCULATE Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: Exclusive right turns reduced 30 V/C Ratio = c). S4 Z c4 W QQ �. JCY C) o W = '_ 1... CO LL: W O g Q: Z0 1— _ Z Z� UJui O '0 I— . 11/ W Lit i'. O ▪ Z AU 0 ▪ ~; Approach 1 - -> 1:LT= 38 TH =1262 RT= 3 Al - -> A2 <-- A3 1 v A A4 1 " A A Intersection: South 180th Street /Sperry Problem- Statement: CPF / 180SPEWP.NCP Step 1.. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY 1 Approach 3:Driveway 11 1 I I R L I N S. 180th St. I RTTTL I T > " - -RT <^ -RTH 1 < - -TH 1 <v -LTH v - -LT 1 Approach 2 A T H H N Approach 1 < < 1 > 1 LT - -A v v v LTH - "> 1 TH - -> 1 RTH -v> RT--v < < 1 > > LLTRR I T T H T T IS. 180th St. ( H H 1 II 111 1 Approach 4:Sperry Dr. Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph 1 Approach 31 3: LT= 104 1 1 1 2:RT= 98 TH= 0 1 1 1 TH =1292 RT= 32 1 v 1 LT= 11 Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING - v -- 8281 --" AND < -- A182 AND - -> OR v -- /OR A2B1 - -> < -- A1A2 1 1 AND < ^ A384 AND v > OR I I /OR A483 <-- Approach 2 1 " 1 4: RT= 34 1 1 1 TH= 4 1 1 1 LT= 49 1 Approach 41 81 v -- B3 <1 I1 82 - -^ 84 1> Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 Drive Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK Step Approach -1- -2- -3- -4- a.No. of change 0 0 60 60 intervals /hour b.LT capacity on 0 change (vph) c.G /C ratio 0 d.Opposing volume : 0 in vph • e.LT capacity on 0 green (vph) f.LT capacity in 0 vph (b+e) • g.Left turn volume : 0 in vph h.Is volume > cap. : (g >f) ? Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph 1 1 I 3 0 204 38 -" 633 -> 630 +> 3 +v statt =s =sit=s= == = =tts =sta == =s= ==sass= I+ + < V > Approach 1 See Step 6b. I I I I I I 1 Approach 41 4 1 1 1 94591 0 120 120 Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) 1 Approach 31 I I I I 1 I 0 .5 .5 8261 0 38 32 A162 A1A2 0 562 568 A483 0 682 688 0 104 49 NO NO "+ 98 <+ 597 <- 695 v- 11 Approach 2 Design Hour: 1998 PM W/ GAS & OPTICAL Prob- able Phase COMMENTS t = =a ===s= = == ta■s = ■= = sa == =es= 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Possible Volume Adjusted Critical Carryover Critical Volume to next Volume in vph phase in vph 11(81) 38- 11= 27(82) 27(82) 633- 27= 606(A1) 695(A2) OR 606(A1) 123(A4 +84) OR 71(A3 +B3) Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 38(8182) +695(A2) +123(A484) +0() = 856 vph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) 1 Step 9. RECALCULATE Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: Exclusive right turns reduced 32 % V/C Ratio = .62 11 27 695 123 . Q W • UO J I W 0 : � N • a Zi Z 0 • !O N ;p H W ` Z: c iy • I O y Z Intersection: South 180th Street /Sperry Drive Problem•Statement: CPF / 180SPEWS.NCP Step 1. IDENTIFY LANE GEOMETRY 1 Approach 3:Driveway 1 1 1 1 I R L 1 N S. 180th St. I BTTTL 1 T H H H T Approach 1 < < 1 > > 1 LT-- LTH - ^> 1 TH- -> 1 RTH-v> RT - -v A - -RT v v v < 1 < - -TH 1 <v -LTH ^ ^ ^ v - -LT 1 < < 1 > > Approach 2 L L T R R 1 T T H T T IS. 180th St I H H I 11 111 1 Approach 4:Sperry Dr. Step 2. IDENTIFY VOLUMES, in vph 1 Approach 31 3: LT= 106 1 I 1 2:RT= 121 TH= 1 I I 1 TH= 852 RT= 75 1 v 1 LT= 0 Approach 1 --> 1:LT= 55 TH= 831 RT= 2 Al - -> A3 1 v^ A2 < -- A4 1 <-- Approach 2 I ^ 1 4: RT= 8 I 1 1 TH= 5 1 1 I LT= 5 1 Approach 41 Step 3. IDENTIFY PHASING - -^ v -- 6281 --^ AND < -- A162 AND - -> OR v -- /OR A281 - -> < -- A1A2 1 1 AND < ^ A384 AND v > OR 1 1 /OR A483 % 81 v -- 83 <1 II 82 --^ 84 1> Critical Movement Analysis: PLANNING Calculation Form 1 Step 4. LEFT TURN CHECK a.No. of change intervals /hour b.LT capacity on change (vph) c.G /C ratio d.Opposing volume in vph e.LT capacity on green (vph) f.LT capacity in vph (b+e) g.left turn volume in vph h.ls volume > cap. (g >f) ? 55 417 -> 415 +> 2 +v Approach 1 Approach : -1- -2- -3- -4- 0 0 60 60 Prob- able 0 0 120 120 Phase 0 0 .5 .5 6281 : 0 0 13 76A182 A1A2 0 0 587 524 A483 0 0 707 644 . 0 0 106 5 NO NO Step 5. ASSIGN LANE VOLUMES, in vph 1 1 1 1 7 0 5 1 6 ^+ 121 1 + + <+ 366 < v > <- 487 v- 0 See Step 6b. I I 1 1 Approach 41 55271 Step 6a. CRITICAL VOLUMES, in vph (two phase signal) 1 Approach 31 1 1 1 1 Approach 2 Design Hour: 1998 SAT W/ GAS & OPTICA Step 6b. VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPHASE SIGNAL OVERLAP Possible Volume Adjusted Critical Carryover Critical Volume to next Volume in vph phase in vph 0(81) 55- 0= 55(82) 0 55(82) 417- 55= 362(A1) 55 487(A2) OR 362(A1) 487 113(A4 +B4) OR 6(A3 +83) 113 Step 7. SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 55(8162) +487(A2) +113(A4B4) +0() = 655 vph Step 8. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (compare step 7 with table 6) Step 9. RECALCULATE Geometric Change: Signal Change: Volume Change: COMMENTS IAI Exclusive right turns reduced 100 % V/C Ratio = .48 ■ .Z 1 1 rt 111 • _10! • : W = W W } O . u. • = a Z 1.-; I— O' Z LU 2 j •U i0 1--'. . LL O: w O • Z A F F I D A V I T LI Notice of Public Hearing fl Notice of Public Meeting O Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: was mailed to each of the following addresses on ► )Q ,Q ,F) ) 1GOcr/ c , cb E-c-- &Q-06 . 3\c∎0 1 � - a C,0)(4 po oDoN, Umo fl Planning Commission Agenda fl Official Notice Packet fl Short Subdivision Agenda IN Other N LUL A - b ��I�CJ�1 9d1 Packet O Notice of Application for LI Other Shoreline Management Permit Q Shoreline Management Permit Name of ProjectCtf`d_1) C2CAS kltiblignature File Number LCV1 -(tea 1 �� � ODetermination of Non - significance O miti Determination of Nonsignificance Li Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action . ..•. .u6n: -J 0, o o: co o ! . w uJ • J = N LL w o w' _. :z i z � U Ca? o H ;w Oi w Z: U 1. z ■ A September 4, 1997 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development • Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF DECISION To: Applicant State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division King County Assessor, Accounting Division State Department of Ecology Shoreline Division The Planning Commission, in a consolidated hearing, has issued a shoreline substantial development permit and Board of Architectural Review design approval with conditions. This letter serves as a notice of decision for both approvals. It is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approvals. This notice begins the local 21 day appeal period (see Item h). After expiration of the local appeal period, the shoreline substantial development permit will be sent to the Washington State Department of Ecology Shoreline Division and State Attorney General's Office to begin the State review and appeal period pursuant to RCW 90.58. Selected project plans have been attached. PROJECT BACKGROUND a. Project file number: L97 -0032 Shoreline Permit for COSTCO Gas Station. L97 -0033 Design Review for COSTCO Gas Station. Applicant: COSTCO Wholesale, Inc. c. Project Description: Construct a 2,240 sq. ft., 17.5 ft. high canopy over 6 pump islands, 3 - 20,000 gallon underground fuel tanks and landscaping. All development will be within an existing parking lot. Total development area is about 27,000 square feet. d. Project location: 1160 Saxon Drive; Tukwila, WA; in the NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23N, Rge. 4E. (King Co. Assr. No. 362304 - 9107). 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 * Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 z 1 1- ~w U O N om: W = W 00 co J a_ a: = d; mo w, ' z I— • O z U • O . ;w w' 0 . w z : 0C 0 H O z Notice of Decision for COSTCO Gas Station L96 -0049 (Design Approval) and L96 -0049 (Shoreline Permit) e. The permits submitted concurrently with this application: E97 -0015 (SEPA Environmental Checklist.) MDNS issued on July 29, 1997. f. Environmental threshold determination: A SEPA Mitigated Determination of Non - significance was issued on July 29, 1997. h. APPEALS Page 2 Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. 1. Administrative appeals for the shoreline permit shall be made directly to the State of Washington Shorelines Hearings Board per RCW 90.58. 2. Administrative appeal of the design approval shall be made to the Tukwila City Council. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials shall contain: Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permit(s) are available for inspection at the Tukwila Dept. of Community Development; 6300 Southcenter Blvd.; Suite 100; Tukwila, WA; from Monday through Friday, between 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM. The project planner is Vernon Umetsu. He may be contacted at 206 - 431 -3684, for further information. Fi Ie:q \97\costgas\ntcdsn.doc I. The name of the appealing party, II. The address and phone number of the appealing party, and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to received notices on the appealing party's behalf, and III. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in that decision. The Notice of Appeal shall state specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed, the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. z i • rc w U O t Co . CO w = I-- wo w : _. z � I- 0 Z I--: mo C • ) : 0- CI I-' w` , H U . LL O Z . U O � z :+:.:: • < HEARING DATE: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER(s): APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: LOT SIZE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN /ZONING DESIGNATION: SEPA DETERMINATION: STAFF: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development August 28 1997 COSTCO Wholesale, Inc. Steve Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION & BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Prepared August 20, 1997 Public Notice Posted on site and mailed to property owners and businesses within 500 ft. of the site on July 29, 1997. L97 -0032: Shoreline Permit for COSTCO Gas Station■■• L97 -0033: Design Review for COSTCO Gas Station Approval of a shoreline substantial development permit per and project design for a gas station and associated landscaping changes. 1141 Saxon Drive; Tukwila, WA Parcel size is 4.28 acres. Development area is 0.6 acre. Tukwila Urban Center E97 -0015 SEPA Mitigated Determination of Non - significance issued on July 29, 1997 Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner John W. Rants, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 Staff Report to the L97 -0032 & L97 -0033 Planning Commission/BAR Costco Gas Station ATTACHMENTS: A Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application B Shoreline Site Plan C Shoreline Cross - Sections D Architectural Site Plan E Building Elevations F Proposed Landscape Plan for Gas Station Area. G Grading and Drainage Plan H Existing Site and Landscape Plan I Staff Recommended Interior Landscape Island Modifications Materials to be presented at the hearing: J Colors and Materials Board K Rendering of Proposed Facility L Photograph of Similar Facility M Photograph of Existing Optical Facility On the Same Site. . . , �. •z a• = f-; • W; :re 2-i • JU; '0 0; ` co w W S= Wo u- • d; • f- W; I-; • I-- • W wf. D . o1- ' •. • :w W U N ; O. :Z .' Staff Report to the L97 -0032 & L97 -0033 Planning Commission/BAR Costco Gas Station FINDINGS z 1. Project Description: COSTCO Wholesale, Inc. (hereafter referred to as = l.: COSTCO) proposes to build a gas station for its members on a site which is w currently a parking lot with interior landscape islands. The facility would include: 6 re R J U • a 2,240 sq. ft., 17.5 ft. high canopy over 6 pump islands (to serve 12 , CD o vehicles at a time) w w al • 3 - 30,000 gallon underground fuel tanks, N t=~i • significant changes to interior landscaping in the development area and w O loss of 62 parking spaces out of the existing 264. 2 J The total development area is about 27,000 square feet. The proposed project is u. < shown in attachments A through M. CO 0 F- i l4 A high volume of traffic is projected, although few new trips (e.g., those not z I-. already going to the adjacent COSTCO facility) are expected. Traffic levels are z 0 0 estimated at about 500 peak hour trips with 40 new trips, and 2,950 daily trips w w' with 220 new trips. n o U 2. Existing Development: The site is part of a 264 space parking lot as shown in 0 H Attachment D. This parking lot supports a 34,544 s.f. optical manufacturing = v ai facility on site, and the COSTCO bulk sales facility on a separate lot to the „f=' immediate north. Parking to be converted to gas station use is not required to z satisfy Zoning Code minimum parking requirements. o O I 3. Surrounding Land Use: The gas station would share the site with the COSTCO z optical manufacturing facility, and is surrounded by a combination of retail and warehousing uses. To the immediate east is the Green River and associated recreation trail. 4. Topography: The vicinity is flat, with no significant grade changes except for a 10 ft. high flood control dike to the immediate east (Attachment. G). 5. Access: Site access from the west is via Andover Park East, through Saxon Drive (a private road). Site access from the south is via S. 180th Street, through Christensen Road (a private road). (Attachment D). 6. Relationship to Shoreline: The project improvements are all located between 100 and 200 ft. of the Green River. Christensen Road and the flood control dike, physically separate the improvement area from the river. 3 Staff Report to the L97 -0032 & L97 -0033 Planning Commission/BAR Costco Gas Station SHORELINE DECISION CRITERIA, EVALUATION, AND RECOMMENDATION The proposed gas station requires a shoreline substantial development permit as it lies within the 200 ft. wide, Green River shoreline zone, has a value over $2,500 and is an expansion of an existing use (TMC 18.44.080). The Planning Commission is the decision making body under the consolidated permit review provisions of TMC 18.104.010(E). A consolidated review with the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) for design approval has been scheduled and discussed in the following section labeled: "BAR DESIGN REVIEW DECISION CRITERIA." Staff has no additional findings to present beyond those in the applicant's shoreline substantial development permit application (attachments A, B and C), except to note the site design changes from the original shoreline application, which are now reflected in the proposed design: Approve as proposed. FINDINGS • the two Saxon Drive driveways have been consolidated into a single, new driveway, and • substantially increased landscaping has been provided on the west, south and north east corner. CONCLUSIONS Staff concurs that the project is consistent with the policies identified in the applicant's application for a shoreline substantial development permit. RECOMMENDATION z tu': J C)' U0 : { N CO w uj g a. • —a . • x _ : . • Z E- 2 w w u i • ,F V • • • O • • • iii •z F-: Z' Staff Report to the Planning Commission/BAR Costco Gas Station BAR DESIGN REVIEW DECISION CRITERIA, EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS This project is subject to BAR review and approval due to its need for a shoreline substantial development permit and as a significant modification of a previous BAR approved design (TMC 18.60.030). BAR review criteria are shown below in bold, along with a staff discussion of relevant facts. The applicant has not provided textual responses to the specific criteria, but relied upon the submitted drawings. 18.60.050: General Review Criteria. L97 -0032 & L97 -0033 (1) Relationship of Structure to Site. a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movements b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. The development area is the northeast corner of the site. It is bounded by Saxon Drive on the north and Christensen Road on the east. No changes to the existing frontage plant materials is proposed. Transition from Saxon Drive is provided by an existing 5 ft. curbline sidewalk and an 8 ft. landscape strip. Frontage landscaping is characterized by pear trees (about 25 ft. at maturity) and a low shrub hedge. A landscape island at the site driveway and at the midpoint of the Saxon frontage would be removed. Perimeter landscaping at the Saxon Christensen intersection would visually soften the transition from both roadways. Overall site landscaping is shown in Attachment. H, while gas station landscaping adjustments are shown on Attachment. F. Transition from Christensen Road and the Green River Trail is provided by the existing 5 ft. curbline sidewalk and landscaping which varies from 10 to 25 ft. wide. Frontage landscaping is characterized by Red Maple trees (40 ft. high at maturity) which continues the Christensen Road street tree pattern set by Home Depot on the south (see Attachment F and H). Several existing landscape islands within the parking lot would be removed. Additional interior landscaping would be provided at the perimeter of the gas station development area on the south and west (Attachment F). Relocating the Saxon driveway eastward will result in an unbroken row of 32 parking spaces along the street, (i.e., for the length of the optical building) (Attachment. D). Past design approvals have reflected a landscape island every 10 -12 parking spaces in order to reduce the visual impact of large paved areas. The only above ground structure is the gas pump canopy (Attachment. E). The canopy is 80 ft. long by 28 ft. wide and 17.5 ft. high. It is set upon six masonry columns which are 5 z a Z" ~ w rt 6 M U O w o. = w J H CO U. w 0 • gQ a . H = '. Z Z 0 . w al U O 0 H w Lu ' u' O LLi UN z Staff Report to the L97 -0032 & L97 -0033 Planning ComntissionBAR Costco Gas Station above. (3). 6 a matching red with optical facility's vertical accents. The canopy is metal with a neutral gray color. The gray canopy and the red columns, mirror the optical facility design. The canopy's 17.5 ft. height compares with the 23+ ft. high optical facility on site to the east, the 30+ high buildings to the north and south, and the 10 ft. high, landscaped river z dike. The canopy is sited 20 ft. from the property line and 27 ft. from the Saxon Drive = Z curb (Attachment. D). This compares with a minimum front yard setback of 15 feet. ce g The canopy is a series of gray metal panels which sit atop red brick columns. The 0 o columns match the red brick vertical accents on the adjacent optical facility, while the w tu gray canopy color matches the optical facility's gray brick.. The COSTCO signage on , J 1._ the gray metal is a complementary red and blue. w O (2) Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. LL Q a. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged. CO D b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. 2 W ' c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood ,_ _ character. ? '— d. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in z O terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. 2 W e. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be U p ; encouraged. O N ;0 H The relationship of the canopy structure with the adjoining area has been discussed H v �O Z . The previously approved vehicle and circulation systems are relatively unchanged. There 0 N will be significantly increased traffic to and from the site. This traffic must be traversed ~ 1 o by COSTCO shoppers parking on site (see "Project Description above). The Public z Works Dept. has approved the driveway location and not identified a significant safety hazard in the SEPA process. DCD staff note that there is no pedestrian/shopping cart route to the interior parking area, without moving through the high volume eastern driveway. A sidewalk connection could provide this. Landscaping and Site Treatment a. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced. b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. f. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination. g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. ' .�.•.�� -+. C Staff Report to the L97 -0032 & L97 -0033 Planning Commission/BAR Costco Gas Station Proposed landscaping is shown in attachments. F and H. It has generally be discussed in Criteria 1 above. The applicant will revise the pear trees on the new landscape island south of the canopy, to the Honey Locust trees found in all other parking area landscape planters, and will confirm this at the hearing. Exterior lighting was previously limited by prohibiting direct illumination of areas beyond the property line and a maximum of 2 ft. /candles at the property line. The sign would be free standing letters with no internal illumination. Sign illumination would be with a shielded neon tube, lighting the sign from above (Attachment. E). No illumination levels have been specified, but using a maximum 1 ft. /candle on a vertical curtain at the property line has been found as appropriate in many other cases. ( h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided Building Design a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. Building components- such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. f. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. b. c . d. e. g. The gas pump canopy is of a standard, rectangular design. Colors and materials have been discussed in Criteria 1. There only mechanical equipment is a 6 ft. by 8 ft. by 8 ft. high controller. The controller is located in a landscape island to the south of the canopy, behind the tree line. There is no significant screening. (5) Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture There are no above ground miscellaneous structures or street furniture. CONCLUSIONS The proposed design satisfies the BAR design criteria with the following modifications. A. The development moves the existing driveway onto Saxon Drive increases the uninterrupted front parking row from 24 spaces to 32 spaces, and removes two landscape islands in the gas station area. This front area is a very prominent location and should reflect a high degree of 7 Staff Report to the L97 -0032 & L97 -0033 Planning Commission/BAR Costco Gas Station design quality. Adding two landscape islands as shown in Attachment I, would increase the perceived depth of landscaping in key locations. The two new islands would help to restore the relationship between streetfront landscaping and front parking both in this specific location and in the gas station area. The landscaping would also significantly enhance a desirable transition between the project and the streetscape (Criteria la), moderate the visual impact of the parking area(Criteria lb), and provide and appropriate transition to adjoining properties. B. The proposed design would require parking lot users to traverse a heavily used driveway with shopping carts and children. COSTCO should work with DCD staff to develop a sidewalk connection from Christensen Road to the interior parking area in order to provide for adequate pedestrian movement (Criteria la). The general area for a sidewalk location is shown in Attachment I. C. Exterior lighting should be limited to no direct illumination beyond the property line, maximum property line light levels not to exceed 2 ft. /candles at grade, and sign lighting not to exceed 1 ft. /candle on a vertical' curtain at the property line. These limits would help to ensure that lighting was restrained and not excessively bright (Criteria 3h). D. The 8 ft. high controller should be screened with a continuation of the osmanthus shrubs to the access walkway and its east and west sides per Criteria 4e (see Attachment I). RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Two landscape islands shall be located in the Saxon Drive front row of parking as shown in Attachment I. 2. COSTCO shall work with DCD staff to develop a sidewalk connection from Christensen Road to the interior parking area. 3. Exterior lighting shall be limited to no direct illumination beyond the property line, maximum property line light levels not to exceed 2 ft. /candles at grade, and sign lighting not to exceed 1 ft. /candle on a vertical curtain at the property line. 4. The 8 ft. high controller shall be screened with a continuation of the osmanthus shrubs to the access walkway and its east and west sides (Attachment. I). 8 z Z -J c-) 0 0 CO W = NI.- to 0; J u. co z � z i-- 2 o w W 0. u. ~O I " z CO 1 11 O z ■ FA A F F I D A V I T 'Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting O Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Q Board of Appeals Agenda Packet El Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Q Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit Name of Project ( CA File Number. IA e7 6b 3 O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: _ Determination of Non - significance 0 Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance fl Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action Official Notice Other 0 Other was mast to each of the following addresses on Signatur -t T z-s fhAb. 04A, - f - • �w. .J U U O; • cn w: w r: • N LL w O' l J • O; • z I— w w, D o, 0 N' i- H u. O Zs U N. OF • Z Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Board of Architectural Review and Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing on August 28, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd, to discuss the following: OLD BUSINESS: Distribution: City of Tukwila PUBLIC NOTICE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: L97 -0028 APPLICANT: Desimone Shell Station REQUEST: Renovate the facade of the convenience store and construct a new pump station canopy. LOCATION: 15060 Pacific Hwy S, Tukwila NEW BUSINESS: CASE NUMBER: L97 -0032 APPLICANT: Price- Costco REQUEST: Design review approval to build a 2,300 sq. ft. canopied gas station in an existing parking lot with underground fuel tanks. LOCATION: 1141 Saxon Dr, Tukwila PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING CASE NUMBER: L97 -0033 APPLICANT: Price - Costco REQUEST: Approval of a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to build a 2,300 s.f. canopied gas station in an existing parking lot with underground fuel pumps. LOCATION: 1141 Saxon Dr, Tukwila CASE NUMBER: L97- 0030/L97 -0031 APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum REQUEST: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for an 80 -foot monopole with supporting equipment for Personal Communications System (PCS) Base Station. LOCATION: 12400 51 PI S, Tukwila CASE NUMBER: L97 -0045 APPLICANT: Western Wireless REQUEST: Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for 4 antennae with supporting equipment for a Personal Communications System (PCS) Base Station. LOCATION: 6100 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. .Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: August 15, 1997, Seattle Times Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. Z � Z • CC w ` 6 J 00: co o W =, • • w g Q ; cs • • D = d: Z. . I- 0: 'Z !- .ww • moo O N ' .wW . H V ! • O: Z. H H ONFIDENTIAL NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE PRICE COSTCO GAS STATION RECEIVED JUL 181997 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS Addendum to Traffic Impact Study Data Used for Trip Generation Determination Tukwila, Washington Prepared for Price Costco Prepared by ENTRANCO 10900 NE 8th Street, Suite 300 Bellevue, Washington .98004 (206) 454 -5600 July 1997 To: MEMORANDUM Date: July 14, 1997 City of Tukwila, Public Works Department From: Torsten Lienau, P.E. Entranco Subject: Trip Generation Data for Costco Gas Station t:\ wp\boilerpPIemplate\discrpt.doc (10/8/92) lb 1 ...'.- The data following this memorandum is a collection of trip generation /sales information provided by Costco Wholesale Stores at four of their gas station locations in California and Arizona. This data has been summarized in the Traffic Impact Study (dated July, 1997) for the Costco Gas Station in Tukwila. The trip generation rates provided in that report were obtained from the following data, which contains summary reports from other traffic engineers on internal trip percentages, survey data, and sale transaction data. Costco considers this data confidential, and should be used for City of Tukwila review only. Costco requests that this data not be made available to the public without prior consent from Costco. • 1-z: W :V No cn W I". W O' 2 J; • al; Mc Z ,O N W I V '' Z'. =i. • 017: z Nib pity f 1 -1 • CONFIDENTIAL ENTRANCO JUL 1 5 1997 RECEIVED (( GPI-ES al 5 L)7 q- CL4-R f � - Z92 �'r�p5 7(G ti *140 = 28o Trjp5 6k7(..)/f-I6) 1 22 = 244 Try 5 /1",61 -ig • 1)5 /17 = 234- Tr ;9 S C u %oT F SAVE ! TR* t siicn DAIS FLW ,1UTO c PR1A7- oa r; ., Z . • ~: JV • 0 ID 0 N W W =, ;J H, : :N W 0; • a; . cam ▪ w ,z �. z �. w 10 C 10 1H w w` F.- u"O wz` O F" Z 1• 440 • o NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. z 1- W Ir 2 U O: W = . to W O: U. _' • 1 ... W z' z � 1— 0: z W W' = • .. Z . .0 O 1 .z PROP.MNGMNT /LICENSING- TEL:206- 313 -6922 PriceCostco Employee Name: Location: Date: Time: NOTES: Thls survey is directed towards members who may NOT be purchasing gasoline. It can be administered within the warehouse or just aftor the member exits. Assuming the member has no issues, ask the following questions. 1. Have you purchased gasoline from our gas station? 2. Do you plan on purchasing gasoline from us today? 3. Do you have a PriceCostco credit card? If no, ask if the member would like an application and then give them one, 4. What grade of gas do you usually buy? Regular n Mid- grade•( +). -Q Premiums 5. How many miles do you live from the warehouse? If no to questions #1 and #2, continue Interview with the following questions. • EXIT SURVEY GAS STATION QUESTIONNAIRE Make eye contact with the member then say, "Excuse me, I'm with PriceCostco Marketing Could I ask you a few questions regarding our gas station?" Jun 23'97 11:22 No.002 P.02 Yes= No El Yes= No CE Yes= No E miles. 6. Were you aware we had a gas station? Yea= No ri Yes= No LJ 7. Will you be purchasing gasoline from us in the future? If no, skip to question #11. Do you plan on , purchasing gasoline from our station when you shop at the warehouse? Yes[{ No El Would you also purchase gasoline here when not shopping at the warehouse? Yesn No El 10. How often do you shop at this warehouse? times per month. 1 1 1. If no to question #7, please explain / comment on why you do not intend to purchase gasoline from us. Z 1=— w 6 � 0 0' CO 0: CO W , w 0 : LL Q. : = d: w l— 0 .Z H: U 0, 0 H'. 2 w. Z 0—. • .O Z MEMORANDUM 3. How does our gasoline quality compare with major brands? Same 80.5% Better Less .9% Jun 239? 11:22 No.002 P.03 DATE: December 16, 1996 TO: Mike Casebier, Tucson #407 Ron Vachris, Scottsdale #427 Robbie 7.ipp, Santa Clara' 1/129 Greg Scheid, Oxnard #420 Shertn Ryan #116 FROM: Jack Gedncy RE: Gas Station Survey Results CC: Dave Loge, Dennis Zook, Joe Portera, Craig Jelinek, Bob Hicok, Dennis Hoover, Bruce Greenwood, Roger Peterson, Shawn Parks, Norm Straley, John Booth, Jeff Long, Ginnie Roeglin The following recaps the significant findings from our recent Gas Station Questionnaires (778 responses): 1. Previous Gas Station was closest to your: Work 12.5% I lome 68.3% Neither 19.2% Equidistant, or gas up as needed with no real pattern. Finding: Two-thirds typically gas up closer to home. 2. Are you interested in a mid-gradc gasoline? Yes 27.4% Finding: In a related question, see #5, 14.3% said they usually purchased mid- grade gasoline. Mid-grade is of interest to a significant percentage of our members. Finding: 99.1 % perceive our quality to be as good or better than major brands. 4. Are you more likely to 'renew your Caste° membership duc to thc gas station? Yes 54.4% No 45.6% Finding: More than half our members said they would be more likely to renew now that we also sold gasoline. • • • ...+ ' } • PROP.MNGMNT /LICENSING- TEL:206- 313 -6922 5. What grade of gas do you usually buy? Our Members Regular 62.1 % Mid -grade 14.3% Premium 23.6% 100% Finding: Our members demographics and oct i4 e- buying patterns are higher than the US average. 6. Do you have a PriceCostco Credit Card? Yes, by location was: After: ALRQ. 34.0% ALBS.. Santa Clara 58.3% 79.7% AIbuquerq. Not Shopping: 27% Santa Clara Tucson 18.0% 31.1% Finding: Warehouses with gas stations have a higher percent credit card penetration than average. 7. Have you purchased gasoline at our station? Ycs, by location was: NOTE: These percentages are of relative usage only, since almost half of the surveys were done at the pumps. 8. Are you buying gas today before shopping the warehouse, after shopping the warehouse or are you just buying gas without shopping the warehouse? . Santa Clara Before: 44.2% 41.9% 28.9% 28.1% 30% Jun 23'97 '.1`ucson Oxnard 91.5% 52.9% ztt 9 -, 4 Al or PRczaviot 11:23 No.002 P.04 CONFIDENTIAL US 68.0% 12.0% 20.0 ° /Q 100% 4I and 26.7% Tucson Oxnard 51.1% 29.5% 16,9% 47.5% 32% 23% VAR. (5.9 %) +2.3% +3.6% 0% Collectively, 72% buy gas ind shop at our warehouse the same day. The majority of this group buys gas before they shop the warehouse. Also of note is that an average 28% are just buying gas and not shopping the warehouse on the same day. :� z JU o • .U) : W I N � w u < • ± _. • Z I - a LLI U � . w w '. H V : • • u. ~O 0. ~. .z } PROP.MNGMNT/LICENSING- TEL:206 -313 -6922 Tucson, AZ. 32 % Santa Clara; CA. 30 % Oxnard, CA. 23 % Albuquerque, NM. 27 % Average = 28 % Mar 21'97 13:26 No.005 P.03 CONFIDENTIAL GAS STATIONS SURVEY DECEMBER 12, 1996 SAMPLE OF 750 QUESTIONNAIRES QUESTION: Are you buying gasoline and not shopping the warehouse? Percentage of Gasoline Purchasing Members Not Shopping at the Warehouse that Visit We feel that this percentage is high given that it was peak period in the warehouses and the activity level could influence some members to just shop the convenience item and avoid the crowds of the warehouse. • 6 .J U U o "s . NU cn w • W =' g'-j! •u. �w • • z • moo. ,w W UN: I—:. .z R• 452 /21 375 /22 394 /23 387 R4 404 /25 407 R6 268 TAL 2,687 1/27 379 1/28 355 1/29 372 U3• 346 1/31 365 U1 409 1/2 368 TOTAL _ 2,594 1/3 342 1/4 340 1/5 343 1/6 340 124 372 1/a 378 1/9 350 TOTAL 2,465 R0 1,093 /21 924 /22 914 /23 913 124 1,019 /25 1,064 126 812 OTAL 6,739 /27 952 /2E 1,034 /29 1,007 /30 1,022 /31 1,196 /1 1,184 /2 1,012 OTAL _ 7,407 /3 1,135 /4 1,021 /5 1,087 /6 1,076 /7 1,224 /8 1,216 /9 1,053 OTAL 7,812 /20 1,154 R1 1,143 /22 984 /23 1,177 R4 1,245 /25 1,279 R6 923 OTAL 7,905 , /27 1,298 /28 1,187 /29 1,192 /30 1,225 /31 1,358 /1 1,260 /2 1,081 OTAL , 8,601 /3 1,316 /4 1,332 /5 I,252 /6 1,266 /7 1,437 /2 1,256 /9 1,061 OTAL 8,920 /1• 1,241 11 1,176 /12 1,219 • DAfiLy Tre-4-Als"/Icrioni cousors OXNARD, CA V eek 1 # of Date Trans. 11 1/12 1/13 1/14 1/15 1/16 TOTAL 400 247 387 378 399 474 346 2.631 k 5 : 311 (c v .. ` 7i 1 d ` . CONFIDENTIAL # of Trans. ALBUQUERQUE 1917 Week 1 Date 1(12 1/13 1/14 1/15 1/16 TOTAL 1,143 1,033 1,076 1,052 1,312 1,171 1,050 7,837 �q • 1064 i � � . " � da � 5 t 01 ENTRANCO MAR 1 1 1997 RECEIVED SANTA CLARA, CA 7919 W eek 1 D ate # of Trans. 1,155 /13 /14 /15 /16 " OTAL 8,410 1,430 1,218 -971 , O5,,113I � do PR NAM fgrolex, orioni ge ceve pInae ,PEtfi¢Se, , +%�: TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT CARLSBAD PRICE CLUB, GASOLINE FACILITY ADDITION CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Prepared by:, LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN E N G I N E E R S 8989 Rio San Diego Drive, Suite 135 San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 299 -3090 February 20, 1997 JPK/JAB /jh 3- 970710 CONFIDENTIAL I- Z �. . 00; 3 : N 0 ', w W 0 ' J- tL Q' . co a a 1 �.= : . Z I— 0 Z F- W uw: 0 W W' • Z; Au Z • LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN E N G I N E E R S INTRODUCTION Included in this traffic assessment is the following: 1 CONFIDENTIAL TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT CARLSBAD PRICE CLUB, GASOLINE FACILITY ADDITION CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA This traffic assessment has been prepared to determine the potential impacts of adding a self serving fueling station to the existing Carlsbad Price Club. The Price Club is located on the south side of Palomar Airport Road just east of 1 -5, as shown on Exhibit 1. The site is served by .one right -turn only unsignalized access driveway and one signalized full access driveway. The proposed project is a fully automated, self serving fueling station. The proposed station includes three islands with two double sided gasoline dispensers each, allowing for twelve automobile fueling positions. The gas pumps will be located on the east side of the site. Exhibit 2 shows the proposed site plan. Gasoline dispensing is activated by a debit or credit payment card and no cash is accepted at the islands. Except for daily start up at opening and shut down at closing, the facility is designed to operate without manpower. However, the station will be opened only when employees are on duty at the Price Club. Only Price Club members will be allowed to purchase gasoline. • Existing conditions description • Traffic generation determination • Analysis of the two project driveways with additional traffic • On -site circulation assessment • Conclusions EXISTING CONDITIONS , The following is a brief description of the roadways in the area surrounding the Price Club. Exhibit 3 shows an existing conditions diagram. Palomar Airport Road is a six lane divided roadway in the project vicinity, Traffic signals are provided at the 1 -5 ramps, Paseo del Norte and the main Price Club entrance. Curbside parking is not allowed and the speed limit is posted at 45 mph west of Palomar Airport Road and 55 mph east of Palomar Airport Road. The Price Club LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN E N G I N E E R S entrance is currently a "T" intersection at Palomar Airport Road. Construction is on- going which will add the north leg to the intersection leading to Carlsbad Ranch. Paseo del Norte is a four lane roadway in the project vicinity divided by a two -way left- turn lane. Bike lanes are provided and the speed limit is posted at 40 mph. Exhibit 4 shows the existing traffic volumes. The daily (ADT) traffic volumes were obtained from City of Carlsbad records and represent 1996 conditions. Linscott, Law & Greenspan conducted PM peak hour turning movement counts at the project driveways on February 5,1997. Appendix A contains these count sheets. TRAFFIC GENERATION There are no published traffic generations rates for adding gasoline facilities to Price Club type facilities. The SANDAG generation rate for stand along gas stations is not considered to be applicable, especially since you must be a Price Club member to purchase gasoline. There are, however, several Price Clubs to which gasoline facilities have been recently added. The nearest one is located in Oxnard, California. The gasoline facility at the Oxnard Price Club is identical to what is proposed at the Carlsbad Price Club. Therefore, it is assumed that the proposed project will generate a similar amount of traffic as the Oxnard gasoline facility. However, it should be noted that the Oxnard facility had a sales volume 48% greater than the Carlsbad facility in 1996, thereby making this traffic analysis conservative. A two day count of the amount of the traffic generated by the Oxnard gasoline facility was conducted from 3:30 - 6:30 PM on December 18th and 19th, 1996. Additionally, in order to determine patrons who were coming to Price Club only to purchase gasoline, each patron was asked if they were also going into the Price Club Warehouse itself. All patrons participated in the survey. The results of the traffic count and survey is shown in Appendix B and is summarized in Table 1. This table shows that during the PM peak hour an average of 64 patrons utilized the gasoline facilities at the Oxnard Price Club and 49% of these patrons were also going to the Price Club Warehouse itself. Therefore, the development of gasoline facilities at the Carlsbad Price Club is expected to result in 64 vehicles utilizing the gasoline facilities during the PM peak hour. However, 31 of these vehicles would have entered the site anyway, since 49% of the patrons would also be going to Price Club itself. Therefore, an additional 33 new vehicles are expected to enter the site during the PM peak hour. 2 CONFIDENTIAL Time Period Wednesday, December 18th Thursday, December 19th Total Purchasing Gasoline Yes' No Total Purchasing Gasoline Yes' No 3:30-3:45 3:45-4:00 ........................................................ 4:00-4:15 4:15-4:30 -- :iraTaiTzg ---- 4:45-5:00 5.66:5:15 ... 5:15-5:30 5:30-5:45 5:45-6:00 600-6: ----- 6715-6:35 •-• 11 8 13 14 16 16 14 16 13 17 .12 - - 14 7 5 6 9 10 6 5 7 5 10 3 7 4 3 7 5 6 10 9 9 8 7 9 .:..... 7 15 14 19 15 15 16 15 14 17 12 6 11 ... 10 7 9 8 8 9 ....... 11 . 9 6 9 2 4 ..... ..... 5 7 10 7 7 7 4 5 11 3 4 ........... .... 7 3 HOUR TOTAL 164 80 84 169 92 77 PEAK HOUR 62 28 (45%) 34 (55%) 65 34 (52%) 31 (48%) , • 1. Yes = Patron also entering Price Club Warehouse itself 2. No = Patron not entering Price Club Warehouse 3. Peak hour numbers shown bold faced tab1.710 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS TABLE 1 TRAFFIC COUNT & PATRON SURVEY OXNARD PRICE COSTCO CONFIDENTIAL Overall Summary Average = 64 entering during peak hour Overall = 52% also going into Price Club ' During Peak hour = 49% also going into Price Club "': COSMO WffOLESALE COSTCO GASOLINE The proposed project is the development of a fully automated, self serve fueling station for members only as an accessory use to the existing Costco. The proposed station includes 3 islands with 2 double sided gasoline dispensers each, allowing for 12 automobile fueling positions. Each fuel hose shall be installed with a break -away device that will stop the flow of fuel at both ends when pulled from the dispenser. The facility would be covered by a canopy with color and signage to coordinate with the main Costco building. The computerized controller, which runs the payment, dispensing, and turbine activation systems, is housed by a 6 ft. by 8 ft. steel unit painted to coordinate with the Costco building colors. The enclosure houses the TLS350 fuel system monitor and main power sub- panel. Fuel is to be stored in 3 double walled fiberglass underground storage tanks Gasoline dispensing is activated by debit or credit payment card, no cash is accepted at the islands. Except for daily start up at opening and shut down at closing, the facility is designed to operate without manpower. However, the station will be opened only when employees are on duty at the Costco and regular maintenance checks will be made throughout the day. A video monitor, direct phone, and alarm systems connect the gas station to the main facility. The TLS350 monitor system to be installed includes leak and spill detection systems which provide positive shutdown of the flow of gasoline if a loss of pressure or leak is detected . An emergency shut -off switch which is wired directly into the main Costco building, will be installed on the control enclosure unit and on a canopy column so that immediate notification will take place should the emergency switch be activated. The fueling facility will be equipped with a spill clean -up kit and an emergency response plan located in the control enclosure. All equipment to be installed is of the latest technology to prevent environmental mishaps and will be installed by professionals in the field according to code or better than code requirements. The gas station is proposed as an added benefit to our members by providing a fast, convenient alternative to purchase gasoline at a fair price. updated 4/14/97 999 tale Drive, Issaquaih. WA 98027 • 206, 3 13.8100 z Et w U0 CO o WI CO LL, w O g J: u. D a �._ w i- 0 D o; o N = U ` U = _; O ~` 4. Determine and consider the visual impact that the commercial /industrial development will have on the surrounding area. 5. Encourage provisions for public access, especially visual and pedestrian, as an integral part of commercial /industrial waterfront development. 6. Design new commercial /industrial facilities and improve existing ones in such a way as to minimize wasteful use of the shoreline. 7. Encourage multiple use types of commercial /industrial development to provide public access and promote round - the -clock utilization of the shorelines. 8. Short -term economic gain or convenience in developments should be evaluated in w relation to long -term and potential impairments to the desirable biological features of 6 = the river and its shoreline. -J v 0 B. PUBLIC ACCESS ELEMENT w = 1. Public access to and along the water's edge should be provided in new developments. u a. Water- dependent economic activities should be designed to allow substantial public wO access to the shoreline. b. For non -water dependent economic activities, where permitted, the entire water's edge N should be available for public access, consistent with private property rights. w c. For multi - family residential developments, the water's edge should be kept free of z buildings and fences with public access made possible. Z 0. d. For a new single - family dwelling unit, the water's edge should be kept free of buildings and w fences. R o e. For other non - specified development, the water's edge should be available for public o access. = uL` f. All public shorelands, except as noted in other policies, should be available for public i = access to the water's edge. =. z 2. Any modifications or extensions to existing development should be designed to allow public v D' access. 0 1` z 3. A trail system should be developed along the river. a. Trails should be developed for linear access through public shoreline areas. b. Access points to and along the river should be linked by a system of trails. c. The connection of other trails in the region to the shoreline trail system should be encouraged and developed. d. To assist in developing a trail system, incentives should be offered to property owners for utilizing set -back areas. C. CIRCULATION ELEMENT 1. Roadways adjacent to the shoreline should be designed primarily for slow - moving traffic that would provide for recreational activities. 2. Parking facilities should be located upland with provisions for adding pedestrian access to the shoreline. 3. Public transportation should be designated to facilitate access to and along the shoreline. 4. Railroads should be encouraged to offer their rights -of -way for multiple use consistent with a shoreline location and with public safety. D. RECREATIONAL ELEMENT 1. Publicly owned recreational uses should be enhanced and, when feasible, enlarged. SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 7 1 a. The public should have first option to buy shoreland as it becomes available for sale, based on an acquisition plan with clear public intent. b. The opportunity for sport fishing in the river should be enhanced. 2. Recreational uses should be incorporated with other shoreline activities. 3. Those unique or fragile areas of the shoreline which cannot be maintained in a natural condition under human uses should be designed and maintained as open space for passive forms of recreation. 4. Views of the shoreline and water from shoreline and upland areas should be preserved and z enhanced. re 2 a. New shoreline development should not significantly obstruct views of the shoreline or o o the water. o b. Enhancement of views shall not be construed to mean excessive removal of vegetation. co x E. SHORELINE USE ELEMENT w O 1. Shoreline activities identified as being appropriate shoreline uses should be planned for and g encouraged. u- < a. Short-term economic gain or convenience in developments should be evaluated in = w ' relationship to long -term and potential impairments to the desirable biological and I-- aesthetic features of the river and its shoreline. z H.O b. Preference will be given to those activities which protect and enhance the desirable w features of the river, depend on a shoreline location, and /or provide public access to the n o shoreline. o — c. Shorelines particularly suited for a specific and appropriate use or activity should be l— planned for and designated. 0' . d. Multiple use of shorelines should be planned for locations where integration of �- p compatible uses is feasible. w w U 2. Relocation of those activities identified as being inappropriate should be planned for and N - encouraged. 0 3. Aesthetic considerations should be encouraged when contemplating a new development, redevelopment of existing facilities or for general enhancement of shoreline areas. 4. Planning, zoning, capital improvements and other policy and regulatory standards should not tend to increase the density or intensity of activities on the shoreline. F. CONSERVATION ELEMENT 1. Determine and consider the visual impact a commercial /industrial development will have on the surrounding area. 2. Develop regulations requiring the maintenance of a buffer of permanent vegetation between developed areas and associated water bodies to improve the aesthetic qualities of the river, retard surface run -off, maintain constant water temperature and reduce siltation. 3. Promote linear shoreline access, especially pedestrian and other non - motorized types, in the areas close to population centers; such areas would also serve as buffer between water and developed areas. 4. Develop regulations for site coverage, building height, set -backs and density to insure visual access to water, promote interesting development and prevent encroachment over water. 5. Provide facilities for intensive recreational activities where the sewage disposal and vector control can be accomplished to meet public health standards without adversely altering the natural features attractive for recreational uses. SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 8 •z 6. Evaluate the effect cm' proposed recreational developments on environmental quality and natural resources of an area. 7. Develop standards for preservation and enhancement of scenic views and vistas. 8. Outfalls and surface run -offs should be controlled to minimize adverse effects on the river. 9. Open space should be distributed along the river. G. HISTORICAL/CULTURAL ELEMENT z 1. Protect and restore areas having historical, cultural educational or scientific values. z 2. Access to such sites should be made available to the general public. cc w ' 6 3. Visitors should be provided with clear identification and interpretation of historicaVcultural _10 sites. co 4. Public and private cooperation should be encouraged in site preparation and protection. w Li! 5. Suspected significant sites should be retained. N w` w 6. Newly discovered sites should be kept free from other intrusions until their value is 2 �. determined. ga d . I- w Z = A. ALL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT z o 1. The development minimizes impacts on wildlife & significant vegetation, sandbars, wetlands, 2 D watercourses, and other important habitat features are maintained through the proper . n location, construction, management of shoreline uses (5.9.1). ;o - 2. The development protects riverbank vegetation and, where feasible, restores degraded w w riverbanks (5.9.2). 3. The development mitigates unavoidable disturbances of significant vegetation or habitat .� Z` • through replacement of habitat & provision of interpretive features (5.9.3). cn 4. Streets, flood control, surface water drainage and sewer system projects, clearing/grading p '— activities and landscaping are designed, located and managed in a manner that minimizes water pollution, provides erosion control, and protects water quality (5.10.1) 5. The proposed development does not appear to cause significant adverse impacts on flooding, erosion & natural resources in Determine and consider the visual impact a commerciaVindustrial development will have on the surrounding area. Determine and consider the visual impact a commercial /industrial development will have on the surrounding area. within & outside of Tukwila's jurisdiction (12.1.6). 6. Capital improvement projects & private development are designed, located and managed in a manner which does not endanger public health, safety, welfare or capacity of river to provide long -term community benefits (5.11.1). 7. The development is designed and located to minimize impacts to habitat, vegetation, access, recreation, historical resources and flood control (5.3.2). 8. Where over -water structures or structural reinforcement of the riverbank is proposed, it is necessary for a significant Tong -term public benefit or water dependent use (5.3.3). 9. The proposed development reflects the river's historical role and protects the Tong -term public use of the river as historical resource, by providing for the identification, protection & interpretation of unique historic/archaeological features (5.8.1). 10. The public development is designed to reflect the river's natural features & community traditions (5.8.2). COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHORELINE DESIGN POLICIES SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 9 11. (EXCEPT. FOR T' and MIC) The development is de: led and located to provide for multiple uses; provide water enjoyment uses as transitions between river & non -water dependent uses; & to encourage efficient use of land through clustering, shared parking, mixed use, etc. (5.3.8). 12. (EXCEPT FOR MIC) The development reflects high - quality site planning, architecture and landscaping; and includes setbacks, buffers, height/bulk provisions for open space (5.5.1). 13. (EXCEPT FOR MIC) Areas included in Green River Trail Plan: The development provides a trail for public access along the river (5.6.6). 14. (EXCEPT FOR MIC) Areas not included in Green River Trail Plan: The development provides public access or a private natural area in lieu of physical public access (5.6.6). 15. (EXCEPT FOR MIC) The development maintains views of the water from the shoreline and from upland areas, through building height, bulk, modulation, windows, breezeways & outdoor spaces (5.6.8). 16. Where public access is provided: a) Access is designed and located appropriately in relation to the particular site conditions and private property concerns (5.4.2). b) Access is designed to be safe and convenient, and includes amenities such as benches, drinking fountains, and parking lighting (5.6.7), (5.6.10). c) Access is designed and located for diverse types and variable levels of intensity to minimize impacts on natural environment & private property (5.6.3); where there are issues of safety, security, personal privacy or wildlife habitat preservation, public access to the river is limited to appropriate levels (1.5.5). 17. Where: appropriate, the commercial development provides a connection between concentrations of commercial activity and the trail network (1.11.4). PROJECTS WITHIN TUKWILA URBAN CENTER (TUC): (Meet this additional) The development is designed and located to encourage water enjoyment uses; to rovide for multiple uses; to provide additional benefits such as riverbank restoration, fishing piers, boat launches, views, interpretation; and to encourage efficient use of land through clustering, shared parking, mixed use, etc. (5.3.7). SSDPMT.DOC . 7/3/96 .PROJEC WITHIN MANUFACTURING /INDUSTRIAL CENTER (MIC • (Meet these additional) 1. The develo • ent maintains or enhances existing vi - - quality; provides trees and landscaping as puffers; and provides amenities that e ance employees' enjoyment of river (5.5.2). 2. The non -water depe sent development pr • des for multiple shoreline uses or provides mitigation for loss of mu '.le use opportu ' es (5.3.9). 3. The development emphasi -s restor- on of riverbank vegetation (11.1.8). 4. Development on the east side • e river improves employee access (11.1.8). 5. MIC properties included i • Gre River Trail Plan: The development provides a trail for public access along river here pr • ision of a public trail would jeopardize site security or lot coverage needed fo successful indu- rial operations, the development provides either a public trail, priv- - natural area, pub access elsewhere along the river, or other commensurate •ff -site mitigation (5.6.9). 6. MIC prop- ies not included in Green River it Plan: The development provides public access a private natural area in lieu of public cess, or otherwise mitigates the loss of publi ► access (5.6.11). 10 z = z r4 2 ~ w. U0' t N wi J H CO U- lu 0 g a w a : I- z � I- 0 Z F- n o O = 0 I- LL! W, U F- LL o Ui U N' 0 1- z SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 7. Development on the west side of the river improves public access, protecting owner's rights to reasonable use and enjoyment (11.1.8). 8. Development supports the Duwamish River becoming a natural feature amenity in the MIC (11.1.7). D. FLOOD CONTROL USES (Meet these additional) 1. Where feasible, the flood control project mitigates impacts on other shoreline uses, through restoration of trees & riverbank vegetation, public access, interpretive features, or other mitigation for loss of shoreline multiple uses (5.10.3). 2. The flood control project is designed and managed to minimize impacts on trees, riverbank vegetation, public access /recreation and fish habitat (5.10.2) 3. Where feasible, flood control structures are set back from the river, with land areas between the water and levee set aside as open space for recreation or habitat (5.10.2). E. TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS (Meet these additional) 1. Where the transportation project is located within the shoreline zone or within corridors identified as river cross - connections, it provides safe /convenient/attractive pedestrian, bicycle & boater access facilities for public transportation (5.7.2). 2. The transportation project is designed and located to provide for multiple shoreline uses, such as trees, habitat, public parking, boat ramps, biofiltration swales, public art or interpretive signs (5.7.1). 3. The transportation project minimizes impacts on the natural environment, such as noise, odors and pollution (5.7.3). ........+.,... � 11 CITY OF TU: VILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (P- SHORE) APPLICATION FOR STAFF'USE ONLY Planner: J?>;t e77Tcv . . Receipt; Number : El Application complete (Date: Application" incomplete: (Date: File Number:: . :'Project File' #: T7a . el 1' ' SEPA File #: cI'7 • c , I. PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: 06ur/ii'd 40 fZ G C'4 S72717'A/ B. LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: STREET ADDRESS: I� l %4 1W/Y PA'/VFW , t G/ /C%U /( 4,1 /J/• ' &M 6 ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 36 4 " %l a '7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Quarter: A/a) Section: X 36 Township: Q 2 ?AfRange:Q4 . (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) NAME: CO 7 �i L�i �, i`- Y �Jy A/ 61 / / i/r /�A ADDRESS: � G 4' /G tV /2. ! 6te. 7S s /Th 4/4//, i(),1 ‘ &-e . PHONE: 31 3 - � 1 SIGNATURE: DATE: RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT CENTER z 1-w 6 J U UO . co 0 w =' J CO LL W O, co ci 1- W Z � : Z Off ;O N '. 0 H` Ui lL, O . Z U co , Z F. ro D. PROPERTY OWNER DECLARATION The undersigned makes the following statements based upon personal knowledge: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. I understand that conditions of approval, which the City and applicant have jointly agreed may not be completed prior to final approval of the construction (e.g., final building permit approval) will be incorporated into an agreement to be executed and recorded against the property prior to issuance of any construction permits. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington and the United States of America that the foregoing statement is true and correct. EXECUTED at XS 94<W 41 (city), /J)l-$J/iA/t' TOA( (state), on y ,P-AE) , 199 7 . Oosreo J2/hL ,gS/it View 7-Pp siD jA )7 / 44P1-6,J (Print Name) f?? L41e ,r5:5'490/1//,W, 9B4 (Address) (Phone Numb.er) (Signature) Use additional sheets as needed for all property owner signatures. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 051997 PERMIT CENTER z � '6 2: D! •.0 O 4. 0 CO w w= U) w o: • Q` a. I- la z I- o Z w w: U N' • :0 w w ` - O; w Z H =' 0 z c E. CURRENT ZONING OF PROPERTY: 7 - ti C. % u/c_.,oi (-,4 UR.6/144 CP•A/rE:,e. F. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: GI asTe0 ()Pr/ d/7-Z_ G Q /-Q / //(i(a / • G. SHORELINE ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATION: S' /b.G 6 L//(/E. S'i iee 15 0A✓ Pole)r"- &i of 72- pir2opreini H. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING LAND USES: (Within 1,000 feet in all directions from the development site.) A) : a fp, E F,,c > i e. / 11 F R. 172/H6._ i() .' ,,.1 ..¢1( 0A) D2A1 Et Cos re o F46 /( /Ty E ; P/12/G11ve..0 44sn t 1i /u6 bE.Po r P412,161 A) eo 4-,2 F 4 ( & &s Cc o PT( C.. I. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST & FAIR MARKET VALUE of the proposed development: (Include additional future phases of development contemplated but not included in current proposal.) f -©O - e � J. BRIEF NARRATIVE DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: PO tf/J 0---4 JL / ry pc) _ FULLY 4- a TO i-t A-7,D '' ,�q Cc :ST9 / {' c v-L e 4 ` fS O/ t /O s ik)et t F 6 4,is L, /A)E. f PFA 3 /4 e1/Oo/Y /G/cSee )2/2 r'Oi/MZS 1157s. 7)R e2S K. PORTION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY ALREADY COMPLETED: (If any portion or phase of the proposed activity is already completed on subject site, indicate month and year of completion.) - I L /-/ a., 'TO – r 7f ---, l�X /: T / /.i (o CADS - r e_e) . L. PROPOSED STARTING DATE: S'. PT. /2 r 7''7 . ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: 4ft'7.', J? l`^ 7 . (If project will be constructed in stages, indicate dates:) • M. TYPE AND EXTENT OF RECONSTRUCTION OF RIVERBANK (IF ANY) AND PROPOSED RIVERBANK VEGETATION: WO R /i/M, -.o/e• Go/us77 N. IF PROPOSED ACTIVITY TO CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS, INDICATE IMPACTED AREA (acres): SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 3 ' '. z W O 0 co 0 WI. w 0 2 J • w z 1- 0 Z I- uj O • — 0 H w w H u' 0 LLI O ''. z c O. TYPE AND EXTENT OF PUBLIC ACCESS PROPOSED (if any): S2 C. € '` -) i / ` F ► t ( &s S (5A 9'Z) P //2/5 i Fo S,, Al ?> del iJ , P. SETBACK OF PROPOSED PARKING/LOADING /STORAGE AREAS AND PROPOSED SCREENING: (setback measured from mean high water mark.) 4 PP/204 .16o ' Pi( J4 Oil AM-i z_//0(c:, Q. HEIGHT AND SETBACK OF ALL PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES: (height measured from average grade level to the highest point of the structure, or mid -point of pitched roof; setback measured from mean high water mark) (. l9 F,2 4i (IIL R. MEASURES PROPOSED TO PROTECT WILDLIFE AND FISH HABITAT IN AND ALONG RIVER: Alinio f pA b i3y P. P S*, II. TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL SHORELINE OFFICIAL A. NATURE OF EXISTING SHORELINE: (Describe type of shoreline, such as stream, lake, marsh, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as erosion, high bank, low bank or dike; type of material, such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any.) B. RESIDENTIAL VIEWS OBSTRUCTED BY STRUCTURES OVER 35' IN HEIGHT: (In the event that any proposed buildings or structures exceed a height of 35' above average grade, indicate the approximate location of, and number of, residential units, existing and potential, that will have views of the shoreline obstructed by the proposed development.) C. CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE REQUIRED: (If a conditional use is required, state in full that portion of the Master Program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, if a variance is required, that portion from which the variance is being sought. SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 4 III. OTHER PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT Indicate permits for which you have applied or will apply to the federal government, the State, City of Tukwila and other agencies; include permit application date, whether the permit is pending, approved or denied, and the permit number. ❑ Tukwila Conditional Use Permit ❑ Tukwila Variance Permit ZKrukwila SEPA Environmental Checklist SEPA Lead Agency: SEPA decision date: 'ukwila Design Review ❑ Tukwila Preliminary Plat Approval "P Tukwila Flood Control Zone Permit (per Flood Ord. #1462) ❑ Tukwila Storm Drainage Permit (per Ord. 1755) ❑ Tukwila Land Altering Permit (per Ord. 1591) ❑ Archaeological Excavation Permit (WA DCD /Office of Public Archaeology) ❑ Section 106 Review (WA DCD /Office of Public Archaeology) ❑ Coastal Zone Management Certification (WA Dept. of Ecology) 0 Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) (WA Dept. of Fish & Wildlife) ❑ Approval to Allow Temporary Exceedance of Water Quality Standards (WA Dept. of Ecology) ❑ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit (WA Dept. of Ecology) (Nationwide Permit) (WA Dept. of Ecology) ❑ Aquatic Lease (WA Dept. of Natural Resources) ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification Nationwide Permit (WA Dept. of Ecology) ❑ Section 404 or Section 10 Permit (Army Corps of Engineers) ❑ Other: SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 PERMIT # APPLICATION DATE DATE APPROVED 5 w ' 6 0 O I N o ' W = , H w. w 0 . g Q. S. D. I — w z �. 1- O Z I- 111 uj U O N ` w W ` H IL O w z 0 H z IV. IMPACTS ON SHORELINES POLICIES B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES APPLICABLE TO PROJECT: (List the Comprehensive Plan sections, goals and/or policies; including page numbers, which apply.) 42. 9, A.1-10 3 I2, I', I5 -I , t7 A. SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES APPLICABLE TO PROJECT: (List the Tukwila or King County Master Program sections, goals and/or policies, including page numbers, which apply.) V. SHORELINES DESIGN POLICIES All projects in the Shoreline Zone must be consistent with Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan and Shoreline Master Program policies (or King County's Shoreline Master Program if project located north of the 42nd Avenue bridge). In addition, all structures requiring a building permit (except single family development of 4 or fewer lots) located in the Shoreline Zone must undergo design review with the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review (BAR). The BAR's decision is based on design guidelines contained in the Zoning Code (TMC 18.60.050) and the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan (see DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION). The SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES and Comprehensive Plan's SHORELINE DESIGN POLICIES are summarized below. Note that more than one category may apply. In some cases, the goal for the use or area is noted to provide context for the design policies. NOTE: a) If your project requires a building permit you must meet additional criteria in DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION. b) If your project requires a variance, you must meet additional criteria in VARIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION. c) If your project requires a conditional use permit, you must meet additional criteria in CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION. TUKWILA SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES (King County shoreline policies follow) A. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT 1. Commercial /industrial development along the shorelines should not favor outside interests at the expense of the local population. 2. Locate commerciaVdevelopment in areas with low potential for recreation or other public uses. 3. Preference should be given to commercial /industrial development that will provide an opportunity for a substantial number of people to enjoy the shoreline. SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 6 z ▪ Z Ee J U '. U 0 CO U CO w W I J F— N LL: W 0 J u. co = W z � Z o I- W W ;. U � •0 -. 0 1- W w` • U' U N: E- _. O . z CITY OF TI.,:WILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (P- SHORE) APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Department of Community Development (DCD). Please contact the DCD if you feel certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not begin until the application is determined to be complete. The initial application materials allow project review to begin and vesting of the applicant's rights. However, submittal of these materials in no way limits the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. The DCD Planning staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431 -3670. APPLICATION FORMS: ❑ Application Checklist (1 copy), indicating items submitted with application in Shoreline Permit Application (6 copies) ❑ Shoreline Permit Application Fee ($550) ❑ SEPA Environmental Checklist (6 copies) ❑ SEPA Environmental Checklist Fee ($325) ❑ Design Review Permit Application (if building permit required) (6 copies) ($900) ❑ Utility Permit Application for Flood Control Zone (4 copies) ❑ Utility Permit Application for Storm Drainage Review (4 copies) PLANS [Six (6) copies of the following]: ❑ Vicinity map showing location of the site. ❑ Surrounding area map showing existing land uses within a 1000 -foot radius from the site's property lines. ❑ Survey at a scale of 1" = 20' or 1"=30', with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the surveyor with surveyor's original signature. The following information must be contained on the survey: O Property dimensions, lot size and names of adjacent roads O Existing top of bank, landward catch -point of levee, riverbank toe, Mean High Water Mark and base flood elevation (100 -year flood) O For work riverward of the Mean High Water Mark: - Distance work extends into the river beyond Mean High Water Mark - Distance to federal projects and navigation channels O Limits of the 40 -foot River Environment and 60 -foot Low Impact Environment O Existing watercourses and wetlands (if any), with required buffers (TMC 18.45.040) O Existing grades at 2' contours, extending at least 5' beyond subject property's boundaries, with a notation of the slope of areas in excess of 20% O Existing trees over 4" in diameter by size and species, and any trees to be saved • .:�.. �.;�.,:` ? z z w JU O 0 1 W w O g w ? i . d _ '. Z zo w o N, o t-' S V . O w z. c 0 z ❑ Shoreline profile cross -sr Ions at minimum 75 -foot intervals alon' .. ite's shoreline, showing: O Existing top of bank, landward catch -point of levee, riverbank toe, Mean High Water Mark and base flood elevation (100 -year flood) O Proposed structures /improvements O For work riverward of the Mean High Water Mark: - Distance work extends into the river beyond Mean High Water Mark - Distance to federal projects and navigation channels O Limits of the River Environment, 60 -foot Low Impact Environment and High Impact Environment O Existing and proposed ground elevations O Plan view location of shoreline profile cross - sections ❑ Site plan at same scale as survey, with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the architect. The following information must be contained on the site plan: O Property lines and names of adjacent roads O Existing top of bank, landward catch -point of levee, riverbank toe, Mean High Water Mark and base flood elevation (100 -year flood) O Limits of the .40 -foot River Environment and 60 -foot Low Impact Environment O Existing watercourses and wetlands (if any), with required buffer widths (TMC 18.45.040) O Proposed grades at 2' contours, extending at least 5' beyond the subject property's boundaries, with a notation of the slope of areas in excess of 20% O Construction limit lines, and areas of clearing/grading /filling Notations identifying source, composition, volume (cu. ft.) and extent (acres) of any fill material - Notations identifying composition, volume (cu. ft.) extent (acres) and proposed disposal site of any extracted material O Erosion control measures and tree /buffer protection measures (e.g. barricades, fencing). O Location and gross floor area of existing and proposed structure(s) with required setbacks O Lowest finished floor elevation O Location of driveways, fire lanes, parking, loading and service areas, with parking calculations and location and type of dumpster /recycling area screening O Location and type of site lighting, including parking and pedestrian areas O Location of site furniture, such as benches, bike racks; location and type of any proposed public outdoor art O Location and type of any trails, parks, plazas or other outdoor open space provided for employees or the public; existing and proposed open space easements and dedications, including any trail easements O Dike /riverbank maintenance easement (min. width: 30' riverward from catch -point of levee) O Location of closest existing fire hydrant; location and size of utility lines; location and size of utilities or street/sidewalk easements or dedications O Conceptual storm drainage plans with storage, detention and water - quality improvements (see Utility Application requirements for Storm Drainage Review) O Other relevant structures or features, such as rockeries, fences ❑ Landscape /planting plan at same scale as site plan, with north arrow, graphic scale, and date; and the license stamp of the landscape architect. The following information must be contained on the plan: O Existing trees to be saved by size and species O Proposed landscaping, including size, species, location and spacing O Location of service areas, vaults and mechanical units with proposed screening. : .. �. .. _ .... z iz 6 U O U) J �. cnu-. w u. • J • i �.w z � I— O. Z H 0. O N• w LL • z iu 0H z ❑ Building elevations and' or plans at a scale of 1/4" = 1' or 1/8 -- 1' with graphic scale and date. Each sheet shall have the license stamp of the architect. Include on the elevations: O Dimensions of all building facades and major architectural elements O Location and type of exterior building lighting O Location of mechanical units with proposed screening O Floor plan and square footage for uses ❑ One (1) high quality 8 1/2" x 11" reduction of the above plans. If the project undergoes significant changes, an additional set of reductions may be required. ❑ APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO SHORELINE PERMIT QUESTIONS & DESIGN POLICIES Written responses to attached Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application questions and Shoreline Design Policies (6 copies). ❑ OTHER MATERIALS Other documentation and graphics in support of the proposal may be included as appropriate, such as color renderings, perspective drawings, photographs or models. If other materials are to be considered, eight (8) copies of each must be submitted (except models). Color drawings or photos may be submitted as 8.5 x 11 -inch color photocopies. ❑ PUBLIC NOTICE: O • King County Assessor's map(s) which shows the location of each property within 500 feet of the subject property. • O Two (2) sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents and businesses) within 500 feet of the subject property. (Note: Each unit in multiple - family buildings - -e.g. apartments, condos, trailer parks —must be included.) See Attachment A. O A 4' x 4' public notice board will be required on -site within 14 days of the Department determining that a complete application has been received. See Attachment B. z z'. re J U :U O • W= 'W O` u. mo w:. Z �.. • 1-O •z moo; O , • '0I-: • :w g O w O .z 10D-2 I SittinflASOUra MU LVf1 I1Y PfIRTIIERSH I P , ■C•i■f t kl. HerCurnum A uouva9TAI A Cow Topa, on 11:t1,,,,, Wu: •( 3J:. rw...e.,... , 6.45 0:0!2: i.. 1A,2..... 47: ....,.........._...0., ....,,...,..............., ''.. ,..,, COSTCO WHO EEEEEE CIAO STATION ADDITION 1160 SAXON DRIVE TUKWILA. WA 96186 — ...„........ - .....- - 7- - fi .......,,,••••••• A 4 O m z • 0 m cn 0 c mm z 0-i --I - 2 0 - c ( l) 0 M : a r . m m s ' 0 0 C E Z -1 5 . ' • relocin Ve5rei't /I 0'11 tro Lti . • -014 um■ .01,1.4e PCTAIL 511'2 AN 12 STALLS * q'-0" 108 I STALL 10'-0" 10'-0" r 1 1 1 0 STALLS * q'-0" 81'-0" 502.c16' NE,a 22'151 nina.cat wet. - 11 ' • 25' 20' 1 I KVNOTES 0 s PALOM,le Lai. p mo Lome mom mom. mem am re me 0e p .170 a. El mme mom ammo mo one non omeo 0..0m msrm nommen. 0.,.. 0 ,:. .,.... 4� ® ,,.a,.,.o,.C..... s ,,.m GENERAL NOTES APPOCRLI 1 1 �t. —� NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 0 0 i 9 U DD -3 9 F 3 CL N cc 1 W ' ¢5 � I— Ra k G .. C-1s C s t 74 z 0 00 4 0 z D W D � 0 r OD 00 Q X ; 0 • D Y 0 uu 0 u • :: ;•1 PROJECT NO. 15.011 SATE PL.'JJ REGIONAL OPTICAL FACILITY NU PION CMG SOUTHCENTER — TUKWILA. WASHINGTON MULVftlf1Y PARTf1ERSHIP A 1 1 i 1 1 1 t 1 1 t i Deuyr M Svr,. JwV QJrt 1r • M0011 ktYRla Co. lampoon IE30M•••w•¢!W.' w WA WIPE t10EIEJ1044 1AVV!a u/ D 174 (AMC n�1�Ke 1 • l - • • ' ••'- .... 1 . 1 r411 ... .L .. 7 .82*1. .17C. .611 • ne 111/.11 IWO .1.041.0. rid, 001.7,..11.17 81.1...1117 mCAST-IN-PLACE CONC. CURB I WY. °GUARD POST DETAIL ® TRENCH DRAIN DETAIL 1.00111‘4.11.1.1 40116 carat 0 EDGE OF SIDEWALK ri\ HANDICAP USE SIGN N..1./ • • • • • • • ■ • • •. • • • • • • • r ...we e Pure • , TICK DOCK CURB DTL 0 CURB AT ENTRY 414 ® HANDICAP USE SYMBOL \t/' rar, ®coNc. APRON • PAYING j 1.•,• • .• 4-7•13'1, 1;••••• ®CONCRETE ISLAND DETAIL ■•■• ••• ••■•• PONIC .12..../.06 4 PARKING STALLS t • ••■•}T .1■1••■ CPO %Y. 0 I ,••• I RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 0 5 1997 PERMIT CENTER NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO 'THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. *IAA or 1.4.11...••■ 1.71. • W. CY, nn. 11.43 CC 1•11.4.4.0 P[1,10 71.1. G.UARD RAIL DETAIL °DIRECTIONAL ARROW @CONC. CURB 1 GUTTER DETAIL 1 0 3 ;al SD-2 EXISTING abND g41 I :6 P OPTICLL BUILDING 8 • .„ . . ISAMMAI. ••-•: (T PLANTIG I ; I ; • . i -mama Aum... • TREE RANI,JG - :i • . . • . • • . • - . • • • • 1. na.M. • • IS _Ma M KOMI. DAME- 5" EVERGREEN TREE FLOITTC I 7 : °Yow° • 0ERMIT7CENTER__ &IND . C. mTIMAT Ear 1.0MMOM a am. :ACM Mt ...a LaMar a • SCALE 1"= RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 05 1997 • • • EXISTING • THE HOME DEPOT LANDSCAPE LEGEND Skeet 001AHCA COLAICN NNE 0 .515 • a O. MM. •••. * Ma SAM. m At ACES GSM.: m• ao• mt.m. mt. raD 1.7.11.■ 0.1...• 12 2•02.5,00,27 222 •12 ,2 4.1. 2121..X. 24.2 C..7124.112 EOM. E.COACEC 111,CCUMMa MACEIMMI ErEVEINS.GEEPIE s'' 2 O ar.■ •••coaac NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT _ VI/ COPOIVNABANYS Mr•O ALA- EM uo mao m.o. A, 5E-L E.A.MOM 130 L.M.M.E. VIM AC.. array MM WY, we. CAL 1,24 ..ro 5MA. lataerMO0 E. • • O , MIMEC .C.C1CIAME a ••• •• • m ....TO _ .110.17,50A MEM. M alan MOD •=m* MM. M. MA, 0, . v.: arawe• aa., 0. YAM. A• Mom M• m M10 E YROAC. EMSC YEM OM OR O....TAMS EAS .Mrasca • 4 6 ••.:• a • Ematc came • 1.11,0•36.10. VOMMIS YE Ca C.MRAPCM O .''....•."....•••••• EMMOMISft Oa O !AMY. MAYA CoMM, caracraocen 2/ .44 of.1 0.5, Me Oa CC,. YAM. M MMA O ea ateva .....c ■•••••• ..2.• , • ••••••./.., CV. ...ECK. Oath M....0 ....• 11( ....55■5 5 M Me O.C.........0 AS MOM 0 CM mum !a 2 I D .202 T. 44.222 ••• 4 2.• 3.422.1 ct ......A M. Cam., - 4••: , .... , .:Car YEMOMI1 ArArta.. Ea CM Ca EMMA.. :MC.. MY.. O MY MS, M.G. A OY 0. YMAC EIMA 'WC ...4 YO.O..105 ME ft• 22221,12., e •••••..C............. mt 51 , ...WY. OM. VMM MCM 5a.. -Mr, C M at E.O. YAM. M MM. O .. mt. • -:••, 4 Yam. ECM YEMMY OtriMME ME Ca KY 5.44.4.5....M. O .....1" LIalare....... to 4. - oh. a . ree..D.cone seer,. DM Mt CaMaml.til..... M MO. MEM 'CYO .15 , • SMOM ECM 5.2 OT LLEALM EM COMM.. *MCA. AO • MM. • •:•- 1-st ••••••6. YOM.1.6 OMEA.Ita 11.11C205.3 0. ECYANIA 2 ''' LIMOLIOCO '. YOMMO Mt C.. 244 GI3G/LV...V.AR P 22 .L - . 2.2,••••12112 2■••■ -V. 4••••tre•••• ce ,,,....• 6,...--... 0 ,AN11 Ei ..c...1-....c. '''c' .• - ....• • • LC •2 222422 6,21, MaiMMOMMIC.A.MOMMOO• B.C.ITRAIION SINS 2026 01 01 gnu F I.,::,71 SOXED L•••••■ Mr IMO.EYAMS ITPRIPY/ E.41:12 [..,[4:/, • .14 C-2. -2 2.22.2 V•24.4 • MT MO. y ma. smo oft moo MMS...0.$ • SU C...M nu. • MS, 2,1422.1 • ?CA CI, MAYA Alm.M. MA.. LYVE•51.-0_111 ct...':"'",,I.....,."." „. 0 ••414. 222 • 61. .27.22 S .. ' ....'....'• . • • ''''''',..,.. 4,24* 21,1.0•21 O ...., ...T .....o.,... e..71 . 72 . ........... O 1.....C......AME A.M. . Imaerene YOE.... MB m omm.D. a , • ... ' MA, M.......MMTM • LAMM atocm:MAIL. • • ::::1: : -_-_, • ) a 1.5 M.4.00 sx MIMMI ECM, Ma... Li44) LANDSCAPE NOTES 2 11 1..MMAELD AMM Et MA.M.CE mr.: C. YOMME MAL. ' O S MAMMAMO Uri An•larC • aa....1 2 . •• Li . • M EC AMMED AO 1. REMY EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 1 8 COSTCO CO 1I;HOLES2,L E WHOLESALE • RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUN 0 5 199? PERMIT CENTER IRRIGATION LEGEND V 44 .41 PONT OF CONNECTION r34 4.110. 1 0 1 41 1 ccms. 9. • ....1..+a wa 5..cc ac.• +xe. 1.,141 4[1 WA.. Pew ClrAz- 0 1.41. Se NV L.7-47.74 Al SACSIP po 41.4 IRRIGATION NOTES 422.413 ALL 'SRG<rGA' S0, rC •'4OlLE Lrta"4Y G:.fCKi — �:'."it CF_CRRLT LJw.: N�.YS %: YrtU5 m4E.rs .:?' 122,4E4 . S.06.0.0".:OU! .6400 S.T :t.P4 THE I ...FEW .EC"E'E43 ...610`E !ET 4 ERG, 50.6611 .46.0.01 M Trt 4 :CC C1 TAE 0411 .05 •{ 5.00 �'� 060.00 y:4f'T 10>TO'T10 1.24X42.11.... rytC'K LATESA,S. 400 4-E0.. LCD SG+EMLTC 00.11 AN • 3141 0 ^, 01114 0RE03 .4554 SLEEVE:'! SC E LCE 00C4021.153004 401,.4 L5 -M.: 01166900 420 0001045 3 FEM., TO...2.'.TL YECFC.TK1 40011040 E303006N09 MAWAL DRAW NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. if, LAWN / 9i7LE F€AD MS REMOTE CONTROL VALVE NTS it n4V.na1 • _ 3 '7" RAH t 4'} QUO( COPIER 8 11 ; EF a I ..Z, 11 tl a 4 iyA . EXISTING CONDITIONS • , • • ... ' -) • Irt111.3 IMMO' orry J4jN 5 199 PRICE COSTCO OPTICAL LAT' CENTER SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON t• • , - - - SAXON DRIVE • Minn I . AMITY BASS OF BEARING MUM el 9.1•47 I suluuo, Or PAWL, 00 10 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Us M. co cr. uo Cm.. 040 . It4 IC. 0 Itir , OKI.51 RI z. 90000 RI PT VP USP 000.0.100 0 MP 4.4. /17. ... 00 . CNN 40 lot 100 WIN VIII. 0.0. a0C0 CP* 4 10 0 0403I t7041t Of 040[11 v. PO 0. PI BENCHIOARK ■Irro •P Ili/ tio. S0 IMO 00 CVO. 1 DIC 07 PI 70.0 447 OP WAD 0 IL1004 0 PP L0.0 pro 40 0. arfotert: . ...." • 1 -StEE r t C 0 WM E £ r 1 .'4€3i 0 0.11[1.0.3111011.(tRAM 1 MIA AYR., (0•01 NO IIIATEN•el OREM. RAI 4 03.11.4,01101E• MO INT•11.• 3 1241.11131■• RAMO MOSE • 60011 CRE N. Ate /70114E 7. UMW OW teCTOM L.SCAL.DESCFIFT)ON 11..* t. ....Pt • 00 • IC 0 4 0400. 30 t 010 X 0.••• 23 40 4 .4. • 00 • .• C011000 10 Ir.. gar* Owens+. LW 1. 1.11 TM. Isset AC ac 00 00 0 tol 000 73 • P.n. 4 Ms 47 04 M.' 0. or or of og.ou. r. alas u. u itrolr .1 emu., 104 it.0 pr 2t 04 • 00.• KS 0.1 t• .100 .0 0 .0 000.to Ct.*. 1.0 00) 0404 00 0.0 0 000 DOSS wery .• 00. 000 000 00 PT SP pp StIO 04 7440 IP 1 to' tll 1.007.00..! ma., 00 //4 pr •04 3.0 he to • 04 el OM., Wila U.* • Ca MI 00. • 00 . 'IP 00 0. • 101. wet MP* .41 a >no or roc. so 2.0 0.1. 114. 00 Or ■••. ■• • Irom. St... OP of PLIC Koff fIr rm., or Pl N L. MY 01 u our row Or Kraus 2 a n) .3 t z ' I 4-- W e ; Z w Z < 0 4 3 § I ; LXIS I ltit, LUND]. I ..UNJ Cr" 1-* O IT c-14. • 050% IS If IS Mal C-1..11 7 • OVA t•rtrt Walk 1 25- 20- ~Nu r-e VMS .1 h•a• rte crt.1 \ u .r. unrtrt \ ru.ro512 OWE 10 IMMO I SW • xr r • • • . - • 20 - so:r cCer cacao nartrt arts rt• Srt IECO:14f113=8 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN I II I PERMIT CENTER .., • — Ca.... . I ,.• .../ ••,7.6 Cll :::;—,,.;..,...,, F:Iiir 15. ._ • , . E.t.a: 'Pa \ b. ... , . „•• r • • t!' reVisss __ , ., r:•-• — , .: .., , . 1.__..r...3_ - ____‘,-•-•—•.------- --••••—• -4 .. ....... : ...;;;. 7 '4 -'7: r --".— " •• II • III I ''. ' °I .'''‘ II I --'--1 • 47_ ...... • -..4.i.,,... 1 / I .. 1 .1 1 talos• ••• • :a. warm 71110 irtrt I ;:z7; 8Axor tent' -• --:- - - - - I —1 7:i : . I : • ! ! I I '.... - ..• c ., .1:-. I !, 1 ,,,..-...s ...-. -... • 0 LL SKER 5 • III, ..........-•••■■ I it . . . : k 1 ; -. 1112 ifiiii.e7W a 2illiPMBRIFilialffilWear .! .■ - ; 1 I 4-irilpr- , - •Iiii....:--=-0.-?;„ • c Ica I ,• 111 ' •sn..... • , t, . "a4,; I • 1,. I • I , ', 1 I 1 • I , 1 1 II I ITT) trt.7130 ••■• •.005 r4 - - • =W 0,8 •. --/---111:04.1.1.TrAMOR ECISIDOCIDCW:EV - ft ; 1 gal a•lert . 1r tort MOM. 0.40. O • • . ••••.• / •MS1•347 SmON , /-19,5114010.rtarrtreutrart-/ FF-15.00 • (1117. 0. • SIrffle SECTION C - C , . .. . cA Y3 . • 1 ., e.r1O0 ....Z., ■ .I, V \\ ‘... S"------.---'"I" _CLX-Prt ■ 11_11,2_1 . .r ....... ....— .....- .. • la, . c , ..'" • : .•, . .'iS,.., ., 4...i.... t, • sae 30- 4* C CrtC. rrtrto:o %NB rt• Yd. • 25' • 'cr."... ZEG.T1PN 0 - • 1`11.s • II • IQ/ / : 1 1 I ; ii • wt. UK. sow. KR CO. Ito.. srts nrtli acrtIr CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 till-01.9ZELP2/19TE cat4Ola ORMS •••1 rea•Mout %TM. LT.. 1•10 .1 MS 7.1.1 00011 0.0[171.1.......1.1•DX-SMIS 1%.• .0 Cs /AM Mt ara:YR •S form •C't 0 1M1. tr /M0 •MmoTiaMX 1,..0 C0Olt. M.16 .04 /0 .04 M Mar. ••• n(01204. •M 10,R0a NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. RECE: CITY OF 05 1997 110715 #.1.221:61 WM bo•1 Of MCI MT SMCD CI 1.1 1pgrift;1' tXISI Mb LUNUI1LUNS •1 11111111 • REGIONAL OPTICAL: FACILITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 111111' RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA jUN 05 1997 PERMIT CENTER VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION = 7,771120,7.077777 * IL 077 • 710 Wrom••••••• ABBREVIATIONS ms. Amoco. mo Emus. rt. .00. s07 777.0 API ........... FM 0000 .0, ry.....,91... 0920 •taA•so ...u. ...ma% S7 ■•••■••YetA rem ,..7.4-70/0 sus 1771 ong.7a ..co 4.....a. art. mtEms DD Rm.. WM 4007. 7747 .97971A. •0 moss Dm D., oMrs m woo C0/0 /17 •cur.....• .19 .00911.01t00 O. .01 • 120 0070 I. , .7,97 .7.7 00 1711.7 Demo so &ea.. a .X. Mos ma am MAD M. Da MOSIIII I 01.1. Ara A. 2 h C • 26PRIES215 MN. M.K. 111.000 R RM. ME. Mame MAO. 8 Dcmocm mon son vs• m.o. o Mom= DO RM. MOO MOM s o ....., P.m MD MOW= MAO. mr.. 1.0T .• COPIIICT ... *rm. .A., ...ye 7 WA. O ▪ Go m FM .70.1 D.7* . man 10 IMES ms. • momo GM. MO• o..... 7 0.1.7 GU 99 77. GE a.m. OMR GM 007799 99 . Mel. MMT mOME MOM. M. Cla. es eA,...110 ma% G. ann... a.. 077019 .• 70 ano....1.0.0. cm mcm• WM ovIDOI i 779 9, 09 909.102 0777 Mr. emon Goo RM. MS ED.. CR COAM ... Ors. ros emmo• Do ...MT. COG OTC.V. , .1.6. •Pif MO IV. Mem. • 070. ccomm. m ' sms..... in........ Dirmole TO M. *11,1100.1 0107. 010079 ' morn. 1.•70.0VAI. 1,10 ALIMCC, p la 'RPM, CLAN 01 CM. 0.• at mon MO Rama TT tn.., M. Dm. DOOM Pm Irt. ovs• 00,9 .97 74071007 P. p..4 KW,. J14,II• IONTJCAM 1. .0.... L• 1.11071901.4.07.0(91 7 na711 71,2 l■ EMU 2.,* . e••••. pry. 1...2 0.20 a. cum T. us CCP E." ...........• 0, ,......... OM .... MI Mo• . mom or. M• .....7 Om onsmoo i..zr ar•Anotaavorm .... m.o.,. ..., msg..... s. OAR. INIAAO N. 4.5c. =screw., Ka. p.m...awe .....n.e. su. nu..., . ....... ...2 . IICS. MM. MO4 rICP.A.CAL R99 M90.9 re. ...Erse ...• Am......e0. L.. MUM ...... •O ...... GENERAL NOTES INDEX OF DRAWINGS ALL 99 C07:110111901,171.4.21.090..S.11 /010719C0010.077.0C I ME IMMO 19 SMO9 01111.901110313.60‘,0 2.1011T 01 /100019 29/19' 0,0110141C700. 70 /000202 IRVIAITOMS 2 111,2111990070111101 01 1 ALL WC. 0.111 TOIN DOME 111.1.2 MAW. 111992 001 1 , • RILE ARK A WIWI& C PAWL. CANNOT Mt IlOpti. 0.00.1 0 01M70 MEM A 77 MERL VIM MSS 1 11/0.11119,0107. All DOA 1.10001 ISE A MO. 07 M.A. .1 ME 1.4.770.171.117.. OM MEMO ▪ OCLUMOGO MM. .4 FOREDO MILD1000. 7 07.70/ TO C00.0.17 ALL 0.717.11. VAT. .....01.717000.7.107 MOM. TO •100 2909 AAIDAMMIECT A0 0 SM. //E DE40 APPLICAKE ▪ MOMMOLOGGEMOCODE. 00... MGM. TO KM .01710 ciao-now ma caw REM .0 NOWT 7002/0 MALI 00910170111 70 ✓ u.a. 0.1711.11.1 MOM. DOGEMMA M. TO COMM. • SO IMIMRS MO. DE 00.107 Cr MOO MORI. um1121 MM. MOM... TISE MOCOMSDEMODY7 • MONI.0.11.7011.40.1. TOW. 0•07.1.771. 11 GEM.. MGM. MU SUM GOV CONSTRCII. 11011.112.onechworarzsrolo ossotenom Awn a MS. 0.7.700 MM.. RD TOMMY MOD M.O. ROM caaaucno“ MODCAMO TO Me. COOTMOOD 10 E. DORM fOCID .1•74.100•71.10.... 1.1 DO 107 MOOMMI MOM. • .0.0 mom. 1. 00.0.07.7.17. TO MK SM.... MO No MVO 7.7 OM. ma oaamaa,,, Doo om 070*07000*1. MG. 0 COMO 0010.70. TO WAY WM LOC. MES 77.70 10 WM CO MOMS MO M. MOM la 0094. comma. anal. vuu, MAT ME fr.10017 OLD.. mos OG OE MGM MO MD. MOME011. COMM 7.1710 NE SO. MD. .7 .. .00.9•1ANS LEGEND OF SYMBOLS 0..... x ..........:. i ..1717 r 217 l_.-- ---C--..-, MO.- ...--, ''''' ... 2, :,.. . , I ot -" - O a - • ..• OrOt We MI t.ter • wolfs FEA vow ''''' if---..:= ° ■L WM ;:r• r C3 - . EZZ- .. ,,,,“ 9 7 4. r ... .. ...../....• SMDDLER bai 1 ..... . =I. .... '.7. 0771. MO ci--- ,,,■ci0 ® um •--- - 0.---• .,--- ..,..... / 0,-,... - *- - ,...,,,.." 4-- -L-- .1 I ''''''' • . -.... m - ea - `I'''-----.7 4,-:;,- ,---7-,-.....,...,, -- - ... MO ..... OA I OMER APODOCT ...SEA SOLS [MOM STREW. EsOm.SE. MESMER SVC PLAN 91101:909 7.4.931109 COVER INEET G RA009.0117017110.00E 11U7 7199E1711.0 SENYVIA.01/09.1111701E92.9...1 oadaracmoanmAra ova" LUtC0 DEM 1 SO. SWF 0.7.01410 57.9 9E7200 E01.77/0 RAN 01.79291.0.190.11.1.1111,90 9271910 .7111.41C707.015.1.111 DM. E SCUA101100111101191. .01 11.1.1.2. 7.*177)464100 .0111144*520 C01110007. TOMIGMAN MG IMMO. OMOADON FIMPOSECTIO. MOM ESIVATMO MOE Mo. DIMAL SDOC CS 979111101,41 WOG ecuPuNel 50.A.I.DLICALS, pt. pt.. 01.010.1.0. ■AO Orr A. • OsELNE.G. MIGGIOTURE MUM. LEG. MO Laa.azuursoas • • 0.7.00. . IRMO ECG.. P.M MD • 70.30.00.1177MOD MT MCGEE . OPE SYMMS, MU E.CAGY CONSULTA. CONSULTANTS COVED M.S. SOME MO GOD. . sem am memo MLIMM OS 0. MIRME.V. STE MIEN. 01C7 9011920.• 19,...73019309. 94.699 E9 1015 0 90177 01111, . 792 (.1771•01 GEOMMEERS 1S,AVE MM. 70.1.1 MI MOOD 0r...00.11079.9 001,010■Ae. AVE E 10711./..4 01 19..0 909 95,50, IMSOMEPOOM SOUG .01 WEI Oft ..7717 *7 41774* MI MM. SOTE L.M.O. M.1.77 MEMO. KI Loa PULD.MODATIOD =Di IGO AVOIDE. .7.310 DM 00.77010 SITE & BLDG. STATISTICS <cm 0e 1'1'1 W. 14 • ta.....Pro •••••• 0 •- rY/113,1Y Prd%C",%,e. 4317 32 . 7a+17.. , ,LCMP 4,' • SIALZ....ma = • • 110 •■■•■•■■ ••• owe • •■••■• ••••••••• • 2,0117.11■01 j.Z1.7 • 7.11 DOMED MO. 1073 woe _112- .■ a. VOW> I J. ',MOO MOO. e..,,c1A.. • Al_ ••••••• p.m moo warm .01 Low:um.= • 2. _•••cArA••••o war. mac. 101.. leActs • 0 ••••.x..•••= APPONAL )o& SFg.riraig 5•iv? rir..E. fri 507p Doc6, 7 . CAlbilnla 401101 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. a 9 TI OVERALL SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN QD SCALE: I " =80' -O" ACOL5. ACOUSTICAL ADJ AD.BJSTABLE, ADJACENT ALUM ALLMINM MOO. ANODIZED APPROX. APPROXIMATE BD. BOARD BLDG. EUILDING BLK. BLOCK BLK'&. BLOCKING BM. BEAM SOT. EO TOM • BTU. BETWEEN CB CATCH BASIN • G.I. CAST IRON • G.I.P. CAST IN PLACE • CI.. CENTER LINE, CLEAR, GL6. CEILING, CM4' CONCRETE MA60NRY UNIT COL. COLL. • CDNG. CONCRETE CONT. GOMINLOLS ° CONSTR. CONSTRUCTION • CONTR. CONTRACTOR ▪ G.T. CERAMIC TILE • MI DOUBLE DTL DETAIL D.F. DRINKING FOUNTAIN D.S. DOWNSPOUT • DRW6. DRAWING, EA. EACH ,.; E.F.S. EXTERIOR FINISH SYSTEM E.I F.S. EXTERIOR INSULATION 6 FINISH SYSTEM ELEV. ELEVATION, ELEVATOR ELEC. ELECTRICAL ENCL. ENCLv'SL'RE EQ. EGM.'Al. EXH. EXHAUST EXIST. EXISTING EXP. EXPANSION EXT. EXTERIOR FD. FLOOR DRAIN PDN. FOUNDATION FACTORY FINISH 'NHS FLAT HEAD SCREW EL. FLOOR FF.1.0. FURNISHED 6 INSTALLED BY OWNER E R.P.P. FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC PANEL() FT6. , OOTIN& G.A. GALES &ACV. 6/.vANIZED G.J. GALVANIZED IRON &LP GYPSUM LATH 6 PLASTER .95 GYPSUM WALLBOARD, bY1.5.1 BOARD NB. HOSE B. H.C. HANDICAPPED H.M. HOLLOW METAL HORIZ. HORIZONTAL WEIGHT HTR. HEATER IHSUL. INSULATION JTJJTS. JOINTJOINTS L. LONG. LENGTH LAM. LAMINATE, LAMINATED IF. LINEAR FOOT, LINEAL FOOT LIQ. LIQUID L'rwr. LIGHT WEIGHT MAS. - MASONRY MAX. MAXIMUM M.B.S. METAL BUILDING, SUPPLIER MECH. MECHANICAL MEZZ. MEZZANINE LOCATION MAP - SITE PLAN 507 CX ABBREVIATIONS MTL. METAL READ. MFG,. MANUFACTLRIING R.O. MFR. MANUFACTURER SCHET2. M.H. MANHOLE S.C. MIN. MINIMUM ENT. MISC. MISCELLANEOUS SIM. M.O. MASONRY OPENING, S.I.O. M.R. MOISTURE RESISTANT S.O.IL. MULL. MULLION MTV. MOUNTED SPECb. MTS. MOUIdTIN& 53. N.I.C. NOT IN CONTRACT 55. NOM. NOMINAL 557 N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE - STD. O.A. OVERALL. STL. 0L. ON CENTER STRICT. O.H. OVERHEAD SSP. OP'6. OPENING, SYS. OPP. OPPOSITE PM. PARTITION TSB PERT. PERPENDICULAR TEL. PL. PLATE, PROPERTY LINE TEMP. PLASL.AM. PLASTIC LAMINATE TIG PLYWD. PLYWOOD TS. PL.. PLR.. TYE. P.. PANEL, PANEL. UTIL. PR. PAIR UBL. PRO.. PROJECT PRV PRESSURE REDUCING VERT. VALVE PT. POINT W/O Q.T. QUARRY TILE WD. QTR. QUARTER NOW. RADIUS WP. RD. ROOF DRAIN WR. R1. RAIN LEADER WT. RECD. RECEIVED KKK REF. REFRIGERATOR W1VF. REINF. REINFOR INS YD. 80' 180' TCO GMOUNE COSTCO WHOLESA GAS STATION ADDITION l � 1 151 SAXON DRIVE X � �� TUKWILA, WA 98188 Dd600 '60? REQUIRED ROSH OFcNIN6 SOLED CURE SHEET SIMILAR SUPPLIED 1 INSTALLED BY OWNER SUPPLIED BY OWNER INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR SPECIFIED SOJARE SERVILE SINK, SANITARY SEWER STAINLESS STEEL STANDARD STEEL STRUCTURE, STRUCTURAL SUSPENDED SYSTEM TREAD, TOP TOP t BOTTOM TELEPHONE TEMPERED TONGUE t 5ROOVE TEMPERED 6L.. TYPICAL UTILITY UNIFORM BUILD. CODE VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VERTICAL WITH WITHOUT WOOD WINDOW WATERPROOF WATER RESISTANT WEIGHT NEEDED WERE MESH WELDED WERE FABRIC YARD DRAIN 360' HE EET WHERE DRAWS BUILDING SECTION 7 ' SHEET L MERE T DRAIN TIDN COLUMN GRID 120' LEGEND OF SYMBOLS O I MEWS ION INCANDESCENT GrasAl NORTH ARROW /T DOOR MARK LIGHT FIXTURES C E aF YASSIaY ,y ..©. CONCRETE BOARD 23 TO SCHEDULE CONCRETE i T CV LINO WONTED TO SCREOOIIELE - RE I..� EE L 0 , L iaUMEO GRAVEL o E TA I o WI NDOW/ T AIL ENT I FIUTIaN 12 SCREEN /LOUVER GRADE ELEVATION RECESSED PLASTER 4 LATH MARX N. FINISH GRADE aura BRIM SHEET WHERE FLUORESCENT ROOM 2K ^ 'r ? E,,,„ LNG GRADE O LIGHT FIXTURES ® AL.WDDD WALL SECT ION ROOM - .ON NA. !NISH. �../ CONTOURS ELEVATION DETAIL IDEXT IF ICATION / 'f' EXISTING RE DRAxN 50' O" WORK, CONTROL / 1st FL. OR DATUM P01 NT / CONTOURS REVISION ® ACM. AANEL RIGID INSULATION SPRINKLER MAIN ® �swALV 'FFUSER am I NSULAT Z , c9 meER PROPERTY LINE ETUxN xECISrEx FENCE p SAEAX R u W,pD BtaxING O SD SORE DETECTOR ZES FINISHED WOOD STEEL ALLAIINLii ® EXIT SIGN • SARIN/M. HEAD - ) XISTIHG SPAIN%LER HEAD OWNER ARCHITECT CIVIL ENGINEER AND SURVEYOR GEuiE:GHNICAL ENGINEER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER MECHANICAL/ ELECTRICAL/ ENGINEER VICINITY MAP PROJECT DIRECTORY COSTCO WHOLESALE 994 LAKE DRIVE ISSAQUAH, NIA 98027 ph. (425) 315.6100 t1LVANNY ARCHITECTS 11820 WORTH, WAY, 0E -300 BELLEME, NIA 99005 ph. (425) 822 -0444 PROJECT MSNA6ER: RISA YUK1 DE USN DEVELOPMENT GROUP 8100 BALBOA PLACE VAN NUYS, CA 91406 ph. (918) 192 -6494 0E0 ENGINEERS, INC. 8410 154TH AVENUE NE. REDMOID, WA 98052 ph. (425) Bbl -6000 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT GROUP 8100 BALBOA PLACE VAN WWS, CA 91406 ph. (918) 1826464 SPAN CONSTRUCTION AND ENSINEERIN6, INC. 1941 HOWARD ROAD MADERA, CA 93631 ph. (559) 661 -8196 DESISN DEVELOPMENT CROP 8100 BALBOA PLACE VAN NJYS, GA 91406 ph. (818) 182 -6494 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT I, IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANEE 4 EAST, W.M.; AND OF GOVERNMENT LOT I IN SECTION 3b, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, ,W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT I IN SAID SECTION 35; THENCE NORTH 8-1° 44' 08" WEST, ALONG' THE NORTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT I IN SAID SECTION 35, A DISTANCE OF 165.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH OI° 51' 39" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 53.55 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88° 08' 21" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 693.41 FEET TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF THE JAMES CHRISTENSON ROAD (ALSO KNOWN AS 10TH AVENUE SOUTH) AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 1539551; AND AS SHOWN ON THE RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 941049001; THENCE ALONE' SAID WESTERLY MARGIN THE FOLLOWING COURSES: SOUTH O1° 38'20" WEST, 51.00 FEET; SOUTH 10° 52'' 40" EAST, 19'1.12 FEET; THENCE LEAVING. SAID MARGIN NORTH 88° 22' 15" WEST, 302.95 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 115.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40 28' 55° AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 21.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88° 48' 41" WEST, 33421 FEET TO A POINT WHICH SEARS SOUTH 01° 51' 39" WEST FROM THE TRUE PINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 01 51' 39" EAST, 283.98 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 60VERNIN6 BUILDING GORE: 2. ZONING: 517E AREA: 4. E XISTING SAUDI. AREA: Optical Cantor: Gas Station. INDEX OF DRAWINGS TS I TITLE SHEET C =I PRELIMINARY 517E PLAN G�2 6RRDIN6 AND D INAGE PLAN G =3 G NS'�GTION D AILS ,\ G-4 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS C=5 EROSION CONTROL PLAN 5/IS/00 01.15=I , WATER SEPARATO PIPING AND PROFILE L =I IRRIGATION PLAN L -2 LANDSCAPING PLAN A =I.I DETAIL SITE PLAN A -2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS d DETAILS A =3.I CANOPY REFL. GL6.PLAN/DETAILS A=4.I DETAILS B-1 CANOPY CONSTRUCTION DETAILS T=1 PIPING SITE PLAN AND DISPENSER DETAILS T =2 MATERIALS LIST/ VENT STACK DETAIL 5 =1 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN, CANOPY LIGHTING 5 -2 PANEL. SCHEDULES SITE & BLDG. STATISTICS 1997 NHL. T.U.G. 4.28 ACRES 086231 5.F) 34344 sq.R. 2,916 sgft. (Lhdar bas Station Canopy) S. BUILDING AREA OF EXPANSION: 1024 sq.)t. (1..dar bas Station Canopy Expansion) 6. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION, SIN NOT RATED) 1. OCCUPANCY 616.0JP(51: 53 8. BUILDING HEIGHT: 11' -6' (TO TOP OP CANOPY) 9. PARKING REQUIRED. 2511000 salt, x 54344 salt. TOTAL • 81 PARKIN& SPACES REMO 10. PARKING PROVIDED: Existing Parking, Deleted Perkins:, TOTAL, PARKINS RATIO: RE OW C L O ft`/ A BUILDING, ENV1JON 200 stalls -I8 stalls 182 stalls 23/1000 Wt. FILE COPY SCOPE OF WORK I undersla, that LI, Cher, Tppromals are coh1eot to errors BrICI 5O -1 opproval Of IoI :InD t1U35 not ^ :Y.'. .._ pre..to toe I of con- s , .Nedyed U ..I, , In THE PROJECT INCLUDES A FOURTH ISLAND EXPANSION WITH TWO DOUBLE SIDED GASOLINE DISPENSERS, ALLOWING FOR FOUR ADDITIONAL FUELING POSITIONS. THE FACILITY CANOPY WOULD BE EXPANDED WITH COLOR AND 516NASE TO COORDINATE WITH THE EXISTING. FACILITY. TWO DRIVEWAYS WILL BE RELOCATED RESULTING IN AN ADDITIONAL RELOCATION OF AN EXISTING VENT STACK FOR IMPROVED ACCESS INTO THE SITE AND CIRCULATION. THIS GAS STATION EXPANSION ALSO INCLUDES AN INSTALLATION OF AN APPROVED OIL/WATER SEPARATOR. AN EXISTING COMPUTERIZED CONTROLLER, WHICH RUNS *HE PAYMENT, PUMFIN6, AND MONITORING SYSTEMS, THAT 15 HOUSED BY A 51X FOOT BY EIGHT FOOT 576EL UNIT PAINTED TO COORDINATE WITH THE MAIN WAREHOUSE WILL REMAIN. FUEL WILL CONTINUE TO BE STORED IN THE EXISISN THREE DOUBLE WALLED, FIBERGLASS UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS. THE EXISTING SYSTEM INCLUDES AN ALARM TIED INTO THE COSTCO OFFICES, LEAK DETECTION SYSTEMS TO AUTOMATICALLY STOP THE FLOW OF GASOLINE, AN INTERCOM TO THE MAIN WAREHOUSE TO CALL FOR ASSISTANCE, AND A CONTINUOUS TANK MONITORING SYSTEM TO CHECK FOR FLUID LEAKS WHICH COULD HARM THE ENVIRONMENT. DZAoD-Cbei SOLIM WAREHOUSE. No. 6 TUKWILA, WA MU LVANNY A R C H I T E C T S ARCHITECT: 1/13/00 2/25 /DO srz5 /oe Ni 5/00 > oRREc PROJECT NUMBER: 1 PFOJECT ni4Ne• - ..� : :,WING DATE: DRAW WG FILENAME; Cc WH COST( TI JERRY Cl . LEE SUBMITTED FOR PERM :T RESLEMITSED FOR PERMIT SUBMITTED FOR 910 A RESUBMITTED FOR PERMIT COS7C0 WAREHOUSE. No. TUKWILA, WA MULV,A4IY A R C H I T E C T S ARCHITECT: JERRY O. LEE 1/13/00 PROJECT NUMBER: 95 -074C PROJECT MANAGER: RY DRAWING DATE: 314.99 DRAWING FILENAME: 6111A. 00 O COSTCO WHOLESALE WHSE. No. 6 1151 SAXON DRIVE TUKWILA, WA 98188 COSTCO GASOLINE TITLE SHEET JAN 1 3 Inn 7 PERMIT, , TS -1 SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT C - . COSTCO WHOLESALE GAS STATION ADDITION X red G e 1 151 SAXON DRIVE TUKWILA WA. 98188 ° LOCATION MAP - SITE PLAN 1 VICINITY MAP 1 INDEX OF DRAWINGS T5-I TITLE SHEET G-I PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN C-2 AND DINAGE o-3 GRNS I TRUGTION DETAILS PLAN OW -I OIL, WATER SEPARATOR PIPING AND PROFILE L -I IRRIGATION PLAN L -2 LANDSCAPING PLAN A-I.1 DETAIL SITE PLAN A -2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS d DETAILS A -3.1 CANOPY REFL. GLG. PLAWDETAILS DETAILS 5-1 I CANOPY CONSTRUCTION DETAILS T -I PIPING 517E PLAN AND DISPENSER DETAILS MATERIALS CANOPY I GHTING E -1 ELECTRICAL L SITE PLAN, E-2 PANEL SCHEDULES III 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I _ = 1 11 1 I I 11 1 I 1 1 I 1 _ _ I I I 1 1 I If I 1 1 III I I I 1 U NI I I I I I i I I I III I 1 1 II 1 TUKWILA PKWY . I I 1 I I F I I i I I G I/ _ (J I I HIM I 1 I I III III ) I I I I I I 11 I I I I I�7 y I - y SOUTH Cry a _ r I I I + l l l .III % I J I I I I I 1 I I I I (1 I _ I I/ %n -- _ V v Q T K OO � „, z q . . -.. t 1 s D I II I TUKWILA COSTCO )- 9 a SAXON DR. 3... II 6 1 ! 0 1.000 Si. r J PROJECT DIRECTORY SITE & BLDG. STATISTICS 1 �^W a kh 841 VII 1P k §f_i ih lilt Mi dhPh h� •. GOVERNING EXIILDIN6 CODE: 1497 U.B.G. 2 ZONINS: T.U.G. S. SITE AREA: 4;;:i: . EXIS BUILDING AREA: 461 Canker: St 5 - BUILDING AREA OF EXPANSION: 1,24 sc Pt. (Under 6as Station Cow, ExpanslmJ b TYPE OF CONSTRUG R DIN (NOT RATm) 7. OCCUPANCY GROU 53 a. BUILDING HEI6FPT: 17'-6' ho TOP OF CANOPY') q. PARKING REQUIRED: 2,1000 so" X 30. sqx. Tor, - al PARKING SPAGg REG. OF WORK IS PERMIT I 1= i -, _. _.. __... - .. OWE 'p p 1. ' 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 a 1 1 1 $_.- I ® £ _ it- _ P.,.. LEI' LL - 1 rr t �y 10- P N6 KJ. PROVIDED: 200 Il> Dela. crklnq: LIB s II> CM \ F - __ REGIONAL OPTICAL 1 I 4 TOTAL: 182 stalls It r ` F PARKING RATIO: 25/1000 sgPt. NV, 5 L ' ■ ACUITY -' .. • r I L I I REVIEWED 1 rnla plaD w w<d for general conformance with the following: I ❑ 8nucru.al rrn.;sinv pf nc� UniTOr:o B°aXUag Codc .. " - :, ..,nt Provisip : of rle Un':Ep:m building CDae I ❑ !t'ashingwn Sracc Barr cr-Frcc (Chap Cw R<eular;pns (Chap, -r StvO WAC) ❑ Wuhingron Snce vnec r 51 -11 W'A C rc ) I'.be Prvittr applrcurir respuvr: vr:ovfirmwre:vi,b all appli ®b�.46. m,Mi,ivvs vl K7: I � cw EOe a rel ve �oArcAim owNCU,d of NCm f y m° au,LOCry. � arcwS.vc f We.avem vv v»f Wcn ¢of W 6 11 ti I - I (1 : 1 1 L '' -; q 0 80 180 360' 120' OVERALL SGHEMATIG SITE FLAN , I a Dare SCALE: 1 "=80'-0" 5074CX1 . , „, ..°. ".,.z „X e. ABBREVIATIONS LEGEND OF SYMBOLS LEGAL DESCRIPTION I SCOPE OF WORK P40115. ACOUSTIC, EXH- EXHAUST MTL. METAL REVD. RE)LIRED ADJ AD...TABLE, ADJACENT EXIST. EXISTING MFG. It AILFACTURM6 O. ROUGH OPEN1N6 A ANODIZE EXP. EXPANSION MFR. MANUFACTURER MAN1FAGn'R 5GH®. SCHEDULE ANO ,.---- D. ANODIZED EXT. EXTERIOR MN. MANHOLE SL. SOLID CORE ED. APPROXIMATE FD. FLOOR DRAIN MIN MINIMS SHr. SHEET ED. BOARD FM FOJPd7ATION MSG. MSCELIAPEOUG SUM. SIMILAR BLDG. BUDDING FF FACTORY FINISH MD. MASONRY =a :NT L'ZIED INSTAL, ei''''''' BJ C BOCK F. FLAT HEAD 5GRB7 MR M015 711RE RESIS TANT SAJ.G. SUPPLIB BY OrdlBR B'G K. BLOCKING FL FLOOR MI. MILLION INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR B4. BEAM FJ.o. FLRNI5.D 116 ALJFD MID. MOUNTED SPEED: SPECIFIED DOT. BOTTOM BY 099:ER MFG. MO(MT1N6 SO. 501)ARE 5TH. BEDREEN F.RPP. FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC N.I.G. NOT IN CONTRACT S.S. SERVICE SINK, SANITARY SE,. ce CATCH BASIN PANL(5) NOM. NOMINAL ssr GTM LF55 STEEL G.I. GAST IRON FIG. FOOTING N.TS NO . T TO SCALE 57D. STANDARD 011 CAST IN PALACE G0. 6AlJ6E OA OVERALL 5, 5X8 CL CENTER LI., CLEAR, 6,V. 6ALVANIZIED O.G. ON CENTER 57 RUGT. 57RUCT.RE, STRUCTIIRN_ CLG. CEILING 6.1. GALVANIZED IRON O. OVERHEAD 915P. SUSPENDED GM CONCRETE MASONRY 6LP 6YF'B.M LATH 6 PLASTER OP'6. OPENING 575. SYSTEM UNIT 6. 6Y1 WALLBOARD, OPP. OPPOSITE r TREAD, TOP COL COLUMN WSW EN BOARD P. PARTITION TSB TOP a BOTTOM coluG. CONCRETE HB. HOSE Bee PERP. PERPENDICULAR TEL TEFYHO. I VT GO. GONTINUOIJS H.G. HANDICAPPED PL. PLATE, PROPERTY LIFE TEMP. TEMPERED CONSTR. CONSTRUCTION HM. HOLLOW METAL AR AL PLJ.AM. PLPGn 66 G LAMINATE 7 TONS 6 GROOVE • CONTR. CONTRACTOR HO HORIZONTAL FLYPND. PLYWOOD T. TEMPERED GLAD G.T. CERAMIC TILE HT. HEIGHT PLB6. PLUM51N6 TYP. TYPICAL DBL DOUBLE HIR HEATER PNL. PANI3, PA.LIN6 UTIL UTILITY DTL. DETAIL INSLL INSULATION PR. PAIR UR, UNIFORM BUILDING CODE F. DRINKING FOUNTAIN JTl.TT5..IOINT,.IOIN15 PROD. FRO.IECT V.C.T. VINYL COMPOSITION TILE D5. ABJ5 Jr L LANG, LENGTH PRV PRA RmUGiNe vEfc1 AL OR EA. EACH L WEAR DRHG. P AWING LAM LAMINATE, R FOOT, LINEAL NS, FOOT VALVE W WITH WITH QUID FOOT, Q.T. POINT WO hiOOD JT EFS. EXTERIOR FINISH SYSTEM LIQ LIQUID Q. QUARRY TILE MD. WLt7D EIFS. EXTERIOR INSULATION 6 LT14T. LIGHT WEIGHT GTR QUARTER VIM. WINDOW FINISH SYSTEM OAS. MASONRY R RADIUS ALP. WATERPROOF PLE, E.EVATION, ELEVATOR MAX MAXIMUM RD. ROOF DRAIN ERR WATER RESISTANT ELEC. BS RAIN LEADER WT. WEIGHT L. ELECTRICAL M. METAL BUILDING SUPPLIER RL ENCL ENGLOBIRE M.H. MECHANICAL R.ECID RECEIVED 141494. 143.0® WIRE MESH BO. EQUAL NEII. .72ANINE REP. REFRIGERATOR HU F. WELDED WIRE FABRIC REIN. REINFORGIN6 YD. YARD DRAIN -- NORTH ARROW ��l DOOR MARK DIMENSION INCANDESCENT 1 � �,,. BDABD LIGHT FIXTURES THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT I, IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., AND OF GOVERNMENT LOT I IN SECTION 36, RANGE 4 EAST, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, ,W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ST RNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT I IN COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEA CO SAID SECTION 35; THENCE NORTH 87° 44' OS" WEST, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT I IN SAID SECTION 35, A DISTANCE OF 136.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01° 51' 39° WEST, A DISTANCE OF 8355 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 OS' 21 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 643.41 FEET TO THE Y.ESTERLY MARGIN OF THE JAMES CHRISTENSON ROAD (LSO KNOWN AS - TOTH AVENUE SOUTH) AS CONVEYED TO KING, COUNTY BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING Na 1534561; AND AS SHOWN ON THE RECORD.' OF SURVEY RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. /4104 THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN THE FOLLOWING COURSES: SOUTH 07° 33' 20 WE5T, 51.00 FEET; SOUTH 10° 52' 40' EAST, 197.12 SOUTH r tt I; HENCE LEAVING. SAID MARGIN NORTH 88° 22 ' IS" WEST, 302.45 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO. THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 05.00 1 I, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 40° 28' 55" AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 21.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 83° 48' 41° WEST, 33421 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 01° 51' 39° WEST FROM THE TRUE PINT OF BEGINNNG; THENCE NORTH OI° 51' 39 °EAST, 2 83.9E FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PROJECT INCLUDES A FOURTH ISLAND EXPANSION WITH TWO DOUBLE SIDED GASOLINE DISPENSERS, ALLOWING FOR FOUR ADDITIONAL FUELING POSITIONS. THE FACILITY CANOPY WOULD BE EXPANDED WITH COLOR AND SI6NAGE TO COORDINATE WITH THE EXISTING FACILITY. TWO DRIVEWAYS WILL BE RELOCATED RESULTING IN AN ADDITIONAL RELOCATION OF AN EXISTING VENT STACK FOR IMPROVED ACCESS INTO THE SITE AND CIRCULATION. THIS GAS STATION EXPANSION ALSO INCLUDES AN INSTALLATION OF AN APPROVED OIL/WATER SEPARATOR. AN EXISTING COMPUTERIZED CONTROLLER, WHICH RUNS THE PAYMENT, PUMPING, AND MONITORING SYSTEMS, THAT 15 HOUSED BY A SIX FOOT BY EIGHT FOOT STEEL UNIT PAINTED TO COORDINATE WITH THE MAIN WAREHOUSE WILL REMAIN. FUEL WILL CONTINUE TO BE STORED IN THE EXI516N THREE DOUBLE WALLED, FIBERGLASS UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS. THE EXISTING SYSTEM INCLUDES AN TIED INTO THE COSTCO OFFICES, LEAK DETECTION SYSTEMS TO AUTOMATICALLY STOP - O- - Dan CODE - REFER ro =o'FOrfE WINDOW/ D ETAIL 0 D ET "'E 'DENTIF'GTIDN 2 SCREEN /LOUVER MARK OF CONCNCre F.COus6nY _c> MILO,: w,wTm _ DE ,,, Q , ER E r �> B ,,,, W„rm Ng GRAVEL GRADE ELEVAT ION 0 ..ism Ma "' ^' ' TER ° LATH N. w w F1H1� ®6W aR BRIM vnAnE FLUORESCENT s' EET " HERE DRAW d`'3 ROOM MARK ap _� EXISTIN """E ® WALL SECT ION ROOM -..' Br.< ( Q L IGHT F IXTURES .xoro ETA IL IDENTIFICAT aN ZEN -NCO" NUIRER 3 -3 -qq 1 REVISION If] P..- 161 I'�„EAT'o' i�D SHEET WERE DRAWN ® BA w Y DIFFUSER mat BATT imsAAT' SPR INKLER MAIN E " a " ST R o's,ER W0°O NOR. BUILDING SECTION COLUMN GRID PROPERTY LINE MT - - .00 SLOSHING 2 Qs FENCE SPEAK. SHEE"'DE'T'F'a`T'o" :,---- DT. - rA'ER Dw,aB - .< x . ., , DCO Oa".. DETECT. - I /� I 2t --------- I N I SHED Iz1 "musnrx TILE /�/ ELEVAi 1 ON 7 CONTOURS �, 'T'EL 1 DEM. BPN "`X1°"�"° 3 'f' EXISTING """'"' FLOW OF GASOLINE, AN INTERCOM TO THE MAIN WAREHOUSE TO GALL FOR ASSISTANCE, AND A CONTINUOUS TANK MONITORING SYSTEM TO CHECK FOR FLUID LEAKS 3114103 COULD HARM THE ENVIRONMENT. n /\ /� � / f I ®® 20�V-� E E 0 SHEET WHERE DRANK . 50'-0° WORK, CONTRO / CONTOURS '.ER g7/74P1 '¢AD 1st FL OR DATUM POINL T f.'.F.S. / • (� J 4 JAN 2 5 REID M10Dl ("/ // COS7C0 WAREHOUSE. No. TUKWILA, WA MULV,A4IY A R C H I T E C T S ARCHITECT: JERRY O. LEE 1/13/00 PROJECT NUMBER: 95 -074C PROJECT MANAGER: RY DRAWING DATE: 314.99 DRAWING FILENAME: 6111A. 00 O COSTCO WHOLESALE WHSE. No. 6 1151 SAXON DRIVE TUKWILA, WA 98188 COSTCO GASOLINE TITLE SHEET JAN 1 3 Inn 7 PERMIT, , TS -1 SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT 0 E1 • O R -28' � ` I n CONCRE a DETAIL PER CITY OF TUKWILA CURB RAMP DETAIL RS -12 (2 PLCS) i R =3' -3' , \ R =28' at IL>H.�t �® .i N EW 0© I VV :: PLANTER 6 • 0 O 0 0 0 0 �.J v 0 0 0 O o EXISTING CANOPY ABOVE ' 0 0 11' uc EXISTING CONCRETE FUEL DISPENSER ISLAND NEW PLANTER 17' -8' R =2' DETAIL PER CI CURB RAMP ai 1 3-13-00 'P. @ • • CONCRETE WALK I 6'6S(?V6)6. 4i3(Pve# I ,-NEW 48° MANHOLE e' ss- EXISTING PRICE COSTCO OPTICAL LAB 33,100 S.F. n L 3, SAXON DRIVE 0 0 EXISTING STREET UGHT 27 -9' D MAINTAIN EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT NEW ENTRY 17 -1 R =2' SSA - - ss - -- •� Y 6 ' NEW / Ole CLEAN OUT 8' -9' DETAIL PER 01Y OF TUKBILA PRIVATE COMMERCIAL STREET OPENING RS-15 7' -10' NEW B' CLEAN OUT R -3' NEW PLANTER R =3' EMOVED ENTRY 11' -4' EXISTING 51Ktt1 LIGHT .� EXISTING CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE NEW PLANTER T � . NEW 8° I NEW OWS OUT -II NEW GATE VALVE RELOCATED VENT STACK 21' 3 -3' 17' -4 . 24' -6' NEW TRENCH DRAIN r b EXXSTNG UNDERGROUND TANKS NEW CATCH - : : 4 SS • EXISTING VENT STACK TO BE RELOCATED CLEAN NEW Er OUT R =4' EXISTING CANOPY DRAIN, R =3' 33'-O' [I EG 0011 NEW CONC. CURB 0 NEW AREA LIGHT Cu These plans have been reviewed by the Palle W4orks Depa for cnnlonn D' with s ne a City stzndzrds. AccePMn. M sable" ��"'` . of c d not aulhoriz t anus':.., ro rdlAanas- v � ^ns 1�� h o igr `p s ...ds o rest_ ' .1e forth: _ of t deledo design or, r_ -. - n'e des, ::ns. deletkKls ice dte 991 void - a re c a tal of ry : - ::logs b rdsu:- i'nt approval D1°()1 D(r to tie' inai au:= prance M Inspector the Public Works WTI1es EXISTING STREET LIGHT EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALX LC��. Nz' Iw��s 3Ei�,1c vov -414 - SCALE V = 20' 0 20 40 80 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET c- 7)ASPHALT CONCRETE. ASPHALT CONCRETE SHALL CONFIRM TO SPECS. (�l - THE GRADATION OF MINERAL AGGREGATE SHALL BE co d, R =6' ' A fmnA p N �.-n W.�r L.ar an TBM TEMPORARY BENCH MARK ° �� EDGE OF NEW CANOPY NEW CURB PER R =20'. EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN - EXISTING CURB TO BE REMOVED - f CD- NEW CANOPY DRAM'. USE SCH. 40 PVC OR MATCH EXISTING - X -X -X- TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCE CJ CONTROL JOINT PER -- -SS- -- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER- LATERAL O �1 }V 0 "r T11'� Ap ,p�JED - -55- -- NEW SANITARY SEWER- LATERAL y Luud NEW TRENCH DRAIN PER IVY Cif EXISTING LANE STRIPING DIVISIO PUI1_DI GENERAL NOTES 1) VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. CALL ° DIG ALERT' TWO FULL WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION. 2) FURNISH, HAUL AND APPLY ALL WATER REQUIRED FOR COMPACTING AND FOR THE CONTROL OF OUST FROM CONSTRUCTION .ACTIVITY 3 ) COMPACTING SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: MATERIAL PERCENT OF LAB DENSITY SUBGRADE 955 BACKFILL 955 AGGREGATE BASE 955 THOSE AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL ARE TO BE SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF TWELVE (12) INCHES, BROUGHT TO THE PROPER MOISTURE CONTENT, AND COMPACTED TO THE ABOVE DENSITY. 4-)REPAIR OR REPLACE EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS IN THE WORK AREA WHICH HAVE BEEN REMOVED OR DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL REPAIR, REPLACEMENT, OR CLEANUP SHALL BE DONE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. 5) ALL MATERIAL AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL BF. IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE STATE STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR ROAD ,AND- BRIDGETCONSTRUCTION, CURRENT EDITION 19TH SUPPLEMENTS, AS APPUCABLE /1 6) AGGREGATE BASE COURSE GRADATION SHALL BE: ,fr SIEVE'. SIZE PERCENT PASSING 100 3/0' 90 -100 114' 45 -75 /200 0 -10 SIEVE SIZE PERCENT PASSING 3/4 90 3/8' 60 25 -50 #2 2 -6 8)PAVING ASPHALT SHALL BE AC -40 AND SIX (6) PERCENT BY WEIGHT OF TOTAL MIX. U 8) ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE 2800 PSI MIN. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 10) COMPLY WITH ALL APPUCABLE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION REGULATIONS. 11) SEAL COAT SHALL BE POLYMER SLURRY SEAL 'SUPER DRIVE TUFF' AND SHALL BE APPUED EXACTLY PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. LEGEND REMOVE PLANTER / PROVIDE PAVING NEW AC PAVING CONSTRUCTION NOTES NEW CONCRETE 1O RELOCATE EXISTING AREA LIGHT 2 VERIFY LOCATION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCE WITH ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PLACEMENT 3O EXISTING AREA UGHT TO REMAIN 4O RELOCATED AREA UGHT • EXISTING AREA UGHT TO BE REMOVED gO EDGE OF NEW AC PAVING 7O SANITARY SEWER SEE SHEET OW5 -1 gO CANOPY SUMP CLEANOUT PER NEW PLANTER MAR 1 3 2000 ECEIVED CT' R OF TUKW MAR 2 1 20 0 ecnen Lu 1- tz z 2 J W a 1 CONCRETE WALK CONCRETE r F ----EC CONCRETE EXISTING PRICE COSTCO OPTICAL LAB 33,100 S.F. "COSTCO" PARC SAXON DRIVE to t.:1 % 7 - 23 EXISTING CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE NEW 8' ! NEW OWS OUT - 11 NEW GATE VALVE ¢ -- I\-TY se— EXISTING VENT • STACK TO BE. RELOCATED CLEAN NEW a. OUT 4' SS E0ISIfNG CANOPY DR RELOCATED VENT 'STACK \ — i fpl fvi NEW BASIN . p - oDq EXISTING STREET LIGHT J• �4t LEGEND • TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION IS BASED ON TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY 01/29/99— BUSH, ROEO & HITCHING.% INC. SURVEYORS — — — — — EXISTING C ATOURS 24 NEW CONTOURS 76.56 TC 79.16 TP TOP OF ISLAND TOM TEMPORARY BENCH MARK MEET EXISTING GRADES —� DENOTES FINAL DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION'S 1 70.67 1 NEW TOP OF CURB NEW TOP OF PAVEMENT FL = FLOW UNE ELEVATION TC = TOP OF CURB TP = TOP OF PAVEMENT IE = INVERT ELEVATION TE = TOP OF ELEVATION EL = ELECTRICAL CONDUIT WV= WATER VALVE — — — EDGE. OF CANOPY NEW CURB PER EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN EXISTING CURB TO BE REMOVED NEW CANOPY DRAIN USE SCH. 40 PVC OR MATCH EXISRNG - - -SS NEW SANITARY SEWER— LATERAL NEW STRIP DRAIN — — - EXISTING LANE STRIPING CONSTRUCTION NOTES RELOCATE EXISTING AREA LIGHT O EXISTING AREA LIGHT TO BE REMOVED 3 } EXISTING AREA UGHT TO REMAIN LD O EDGE OF NEW AC PAVING Z O NEW TRENCH DRAIN <P Z O CANOPY DRAIN SUMP 7O SANITARY SEWER SEE SHEET OWS-1 0 RELOCATED AREA UGHT These plans have been reviewed by the Ptlble Works Department for conformance with current City standards. Acceptance is sub; - • -- . and omissions r:Yich do not author 1 adopted s orordinance_ for ihc - "_ cf the design rs design_. --; deletions C7 drawl, a date will and er:l _ c resubmittal c: - 7s far sub- - • - -1 approval final accec1cnce is subject t. on by the Public Works utilities hasp:_. Oats: j SCALE 1' = 20' GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET NEW PLANTER RECEIVED cnv of TuKwl MAR 2 1 200 ® 13 Gp ��� 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE, CLASS B SURFACE COURSE i RADIUS TOOL EDGES (TYP.) ALL SLABS 6" MIN. THICK CONCRETE ZIP STRIP/ SEALANT 1/Y R AT . FIRST POUR EDGE OF S COND POUR LAB ( ) CONTINUOUS OCEW CONTROL JOINTS 1' R. (TYP.) 14 CONTINUOUS, r 6 • r CLEAR OF 1 � 1 ' R. - _ —. —___ EARTH FACES p v _ �= '' v 0 o U cv o , >J �. o V u o , 0 0, 0, 0 � v �.p 0 ��.p ��. ° O,3: , ,, ° ° �omo , ° � o . o 1 Q 111 111 III -- 1 III III J �II I il_ v o _ - - v v .. O °o • � Q v- °I� -I o117 III I(I �I 1� = � III —III III III p III 111 I III l 1 I_I 11 III 111 III o v - : R v o CENTER REBAR IN DEPTH OF M Y ABC COMPACTED TO 95% raja o, o o e o 0 0 o v v • �_ ' o =1I -1I -1 8' CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE COURSE TO 95R NOTE SEAL COAT SHALL BE POLYMER SLURRY SEAL "SUPER DRIVE TUFF AND SHALL BE APPLIED EXACTLY PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. AC O 0 0 0 00 000 °� _Q da ' o 0 C p '.. �:� oQ o4�.oV O ' - o o op ° , 0 �Q p �0 6 • 1 O ° ° r / , �'� )' 1i 1 l — 1, I i 1 =1 I I I I I III I I I I - 1 1 1 1 —I 1 I -I EDGE OF ISLAND SLAB '. PLAN DETAIL - CONTROL JOINT AT ISLAND END " I I I b 1 C �..., 1A 11-11 I� 11� . 1 p I .. NEW CONCRETE I 1=1 I I 1 I I 1n 1 1 1= 1J 1 I li I I „I 1 :11 1 II SLAB SECTION AND JOINT WEAKENED PLAIN JOINT 9 70', PANSION �,.. ' EVERY, EX JOINT EVERY 30' PLANTER CURB DETAIL SCALE: N NT O g SCALE: NTS O SCALE: 2221' PLATE ACCESS 2 N0. 1012P DIAMOND PLATE INSPECTION COVERS DIAMOND DOOR 6' NEW CURB 1 -1 /Y MINIMUM GRAVEL AND PLANTER 6 NEW CURB CONCRETE AND PLANTER 3° ASPHALT 6” REINF, 6` AGGREGATE CONC. TRAFFIC 5.1' 6° BASE COURSE ' . • . AC PAVING • ' a — SEPARATION CHAMBER OIL RETAINS' BAFFLE OW DIFFUSER BAFFLE N il , _ � 4 "0 HOLE FOR INLET END, 4"0 HO. FOR OUTLE END o ' L rn 9 O�6\ Qod � m \ \ p 17. . Q d ♦ • '� v___, .. - - 'CI - . '.d p. , t NONWOVEN tea Ua' GEOTEXTILE ' �J° I TYPE 90N PER c ? SSPWC SEC. 213-2 a0 • ' CD PIPE V V O •Q .0 ' ' v C D O O p' Q �: OOl /' ^p o .c0.� U c v _O " ' jO .. �.' I v • • m 1 1 1 -1 I l — 1 I I i II I I I o 0 • o G 11=111=111=11 —1 MERMAN �.. GALVANIZED I = 11 f- 111 111 = 111 -- 111 - 111 - 1 L 11 SECTION 23- Emus 16 _ BAFFLES &LATE 4 1 I I II I II III I I I #4 AT 18 "OCEW 18' GRIT /SLUDGE RETAINER WEIR A - A SECTION B - B CANOPY DRAIN SUMP DETAIL 12' DEPTH , r f OF SUBSOILS COMPACTED TO 95% TRENCH DRAIN DETAIL SCALE: I NTS SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS O Nis O B ~I 6' 6' Works epanment for ceMornlanoe with CURB" City stan Acceptance is Subject to errors and omiss:cn t.33h do not authorize _ - -- :a of adopt.: _ _ __,ds or ordinances- T F.. _;'. forth_ -- - -- of thadeslpnrests' ye d , es . n :_ s, deletions or ro •._se drat " date will void ' ante for �'. ppra>elWNUeI of r r C inspector ..'%'oon b, 0,s Put:... :.cd;subhoes t _' By: I I 31311 - 2 - , , i^" e C[. 23' 21' 16' * 1Y 24 24' 12" SLOPE SIDEWALK AT 4- PER FOOT FROM EDGE OF F ENCLOSURE AWAY ENCLOSURE SLAB TO BACK 1/2- R TOOL AT OF CURB 3,5•.. EDGE OF SLAB x 1 2- ,, , .I{' / ---+t a iO ctry of T 6 14' MAR 7 1 - .•.•'•• l' PERMIT WOES B ND. 222P - - — — r I y Q MAR 1 3 2000 —___ -1 DIAMOND PLATE COVER 2 NO. 10121P DIAMOND PLATE INSPECTION COVERS PLAN BASE PLAN COVER I I l i l 1 1 111 I — 11 l-1 1- 1 111 - 111 I — 111 I E I 11 III 111 11 111. -111 111 2" SAND 1 H I II 1'- �T 1 1— 1 . C e —\ . ' � c NnsN < < ... O ar ,,, t z �: _ _ - 11 a I I -111a i t —III 111 — II I 111- 11 1111 111 -111= 111 =111.- 1 OR GRAVEL _ - :.. 1 1 11 -11( 11 I= I I� I I I I I� I M 11a I I - 111 -111 — III — I 1 I — I I M I — I 1 1-11 111 I I 11-1 I I X11 I 1111- SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS OIL WATER SEPARATOR PCC SIDEWALK/CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE 4 KNOCKOUT E " P> ' EACH END CATCH BASIN DETAIL SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS NTS O 01 flhJIOO9 la..a .'I S.'.y:.... 5/8 X I4• DIAMOND PATTERN WITHOUT FRAME SIDEWALK WIDTHS 5x5' LANDING REQUIRED LOCAL CBD ACCESS ARTERIAL (SEE NOTE 1) � •••o , / I l �� a P - 0 /C /CM C -1 /C -2 - co M -1 /M-2 O•••OJ••OD• • 5 6' 6' • o•••oo••iii0•i0♦ �- • • rn 5' 8' 6' (SEE SIDEWALK rMIL) o • • i • . o ii • • • Oi • ODi o O• • . o i I 1 ❖oo�o ❖• � 6' S' 3• 5' ••••o•o•••••••o♦ • o ODi ♦oiiiiio ♦• • o ❖. ❖. ❖• ••• ••••o•oeo.•o.•••o.♦ O• : •� iiiiiiiii�iiiiiiiii•OS ♦o♦ ♦•�0000••..••o.••• 0 0 0 o o •�• • • • o o •�0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 o /�P�,I/ I.:4, p�. Ri •�• ., iiiiii z O iioioioi•Oi�Oi�i•O• ❖i o Oi o i� � AS PHALT CONCRETE PATCH a .............. • 000••o o•••�•o o •, 150R OF % EXISTING DEPTH • iiii�iiiiii • • • iiiii SAW CUT ••oo•00 00•••••♦ SAW CUT 0 • ♦o••o DOSING ASPHALT •o••oO ••Oi• DOMING ASPHALT EXI < ••o•••o•o••••♦ VE ° - % % PAV�JAENT •••• PAMENT O ii • Oi ii 4 0iiii 4 0• ; :% %/ i i i i % J _ T z .: .. :. ALL OTHER 4 5' S' 5' �••••••••o•••o•♦ _..� ♦ • • • • • o • o • • • • obi •. • i�i • � � • • • o o o o 0 o o ;.••• •• o e o o � � i•iiiiiiiiiiii�iiiii• O• ❖••••••0000O••Oi•OOi•Oioi•O Oiiiii ...............•... r......... CURB RAMP (SEE DETAIL R -12) •i i i•O•oio•�i•• ioioo .. r•••••••••••o o•••• •••iiii a ••iioioiioioiii A o•••o••••o•••o•♦ ♦0000•••♦ SCORE JOINTS EVERY 5' ♦•••.•.••••♦ • •oo•••o•♦ ♦•••••••o♦ ♦ 00000000H •o ••• •o ••••o ♦•o••••••. ♦•• ♦oo•0000•• • �• i �iiii �i o i •o i o i o i o i o i� ♦•••i••4i•e . 1:10 MAX:lit. •••••••••0.4 r• ... JQO X00 AWN 1 �... r�i��� :• :0 4.0• 3/8" FULL DEPTH I 6. JOINT 3 WIDE EDGER FINISH' TYPE "A" CURB 2X MAX. iS MIN. EXPANSION JOINTS EVERY 15 & GUTTER �,� - 2 . 1" WIDE X 3/8 DEEP SCORE JOINTS ` ® T' • 5/8' MINUS COMPACTED • BRUSHED RACK UNLESS _ -- ORDERED OTHERWISE 4• __ -- I' BY THE CITY. J SECTION A - A 3/8" X 3.5" EXPANSION JOINT 5' - 3' -0 MIN. -I-- 5•_0• NOTESe TYPICAL PATCH FOR FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT NOTES: • i" MAX. TO 34" MIN. UP 11 ' 1. RAMP Arm APPROACHES SHALL BE CLEAR OF OBSTACLES INCLUDING HYDRANTS. POLES AND INLETS. NOTE& 2. RAMP CENTER -UNE SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR 6' . - I M 2 1. SIDEWALKS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET WADE AT BUS STOPS AND PULLOUTS, OR WHERE THE SPEED OMIT IS OVER 35 MPH, OR WHERE A - TO OR RADIAL TO CURB RETURNS UNLESS OTHERWISE 1. ALL WORK TO CONFORM TO THE CURRENT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD, BRIDGE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. MAXIMUM SLOPE SHALL BE 12:1. AND MUNICIPAL CONSTRUCTION. TRAIL AND SIDEWALK ARE COMBINED 3. FULL DEPTH EXPANSION JOINTS ARE REQUIRED ON EACH SIDE 2. A MINIMUM OF A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE IS REQUIRED ON ALL PAVEMENT PATCHING AND OVERLAYS 2. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED EVERY 15', SCORE JOINTS EVERY 5'. 4•. p< CEMENT OF RAMP AND SHALL BE PLACED AT 15' SPACING IN GENERAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK SIDEWALK PORTION. 3. CONTROLLED DENSITY FILL IN PLACE OF CRUSHED ROCK MATERIAL MAY BE REQUIRED IN CASES OF RECENT PAVEMENT OVERLAY, OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY ENGINEER. 4. CURB RAMPS SHALL BE PLACED TWO PIER RADIUS ON ARTERIAL STREETS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 18• THICKENED EDGE (IN CURB RETURNS) PAVEMENT PATCHING 3. CEMENT CONCRETE SHALL BE PLACED ON 2 OF 5/8 MINUS CRUSHED ROCK, AND AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE CURRENT APWA/WSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 4. REMOVAL OF EXISTING CONCRETE CURS, GUTTER OR SIDEWALK SHALL BE TO THE NEAREST JOINT; SCORE JOINTS MUST BE SAW CUT AND REPLACED WITH NEW. 6" THICK GUTTER SIDEWALK DETAIL CURB RAMP DETAIL SCALE NTS SCALE NTS 11 ti O _� 3/4" SQUARES SPACED -3/4" / AS INDICATED -HT 1/8 /� ACCESS SEE CITY OF TUK WILA ACCESS DETAIL SCALE: NTS O MANHO'.E RING AND COVER SEE CITY OF TUKIWLA MANHOLE DETAIL SS-8 conformance Dapa FUEL FACIUTY INSTALLATION cOSTCO WHOLESALE COSIcO #:8 1151 SAXON DAVE MP # 95074C TUfYWWA WA 98188 2' ❑ El ■ GRADE `G PL UG I �. 1 ---- - - - -•- ' I City standards Acce tanCe is subect tcc ors an which d Acceptance omissions ado t_ n] rds ormdrtaltces T -II' forth y of the (leelgn rests' d rawl '„ns, ate wi vo ;,t ce drat ..- o s tl on ll r void and t :. - o resuhmltlal of r_ i _ for o_ approval. Final E ., nce is subject to I._., 1- ,sctionby 1be Pub L7orksutilities insp .- C B Date: ,._..1 31 CI ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ,V • ,I' / FINISH .. .�� �� � ja� / I I 1 I - SS= - I I ❑ ❑ ❑ 1' ® JW11 24 I J SEEP SEE CITY OF TUKYALA STEP DETAIL SS -3 4 MIN. MAX 21 FOR 48" M.H. SEE NOTE 1. , 1 12" DIA. 4-3/4 _ SEE CHANNEL DETAIL SS -3 �_l- 1/8" RAISE FIBRE JOINT PACKING 34. WIDE BORDER 1 . 10• � 8 g • I 1--- B 3/4° 8" MIN. 25 MAX. ADAPTER (FOR A PERFECT - 4•MIN. AC PAVING t - SKIRT FIT) RETRIEVAL STRAP • . -. . _r. eL: iti 45 DEG. (1/8) BEND ) - ! • Ay, \�� \��F , \ \ =ma �,'� ' ` 2 7/8" 4 %lol , r \ � �j, OVERFLOW AS (TO EAK STORM 24' i• - 'x d m • • x • - •� • • e • • - • p :•. • •?" • a • r y xtA•0 �' 12" MIN. COVERING FOR SIGH. 40 PVC CEOTEXTILE FABRIC r i r o / / • ' / , r z Il-- I • 7 -3/4• I - 8 r I ���� AGGRAGATE BASE COURSE . CAST .._ L . U II II II II II IT =I1 11 11 II a r � IT II II 11 n n it II n n II n 15" !RON RING AND COVER ! � 1 � '�� . a -1I u u n n •• n n n nn n° �� ;;: ASIN 6 3/B PEA GRAVEL ���������� /// I l L PIPE MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER 8" MIN. AT C.L - 18 MAX. SEE NOTE J - - ----- FOR BEDDING SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION omF MAR 2. 12" MAX: PROVIDE. CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT PROTECTION WITH SEE NOTE 2. STREAMU'UARD BASIN INSERT 83003, FROM FOSS ENVIRONMENTAL van 7440 W. MARGINAL WAY S MAR 1 3 2000 NOTESr SEATLE, WA 98108 -4141 PHONE 1 -800- 909 -3677 0 - 1. MAX. PIPE DIAMETER MAY BE LIMITED BY PIPE - 1 CONFIGURATION OR AS DETERMINED BY ENGINEER. SIDE SEWER A 2. THE MAXIMUM DIMENSION FROM MANHOLE TO PIPE JOINT I i� APPLIES ONLY TO PIPE DIAMETERS 24" AND LESS. ` 3. RUBBER GASKET & GROUT AT ALL JOINTS. GROUT ALL UFTING EYE HOLES. pl CLEAN -OUT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 48" NN PIPE BURIAL DETAIL O INLET SEDIMENT PROTECTION OP lit SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS SCALE: NTS bviro — 24 — 6 °SD(C ��/ ' S. a -� m '�* E')— EXISTING STREET LIGHT CONCRETE WAL sC rt sotncsY NEW 48' MANHOLE II - -- --%"! - - -- - - e' NE 8' CLEAN OU T 0 EXISTING PRICE COSTCO OPTICAL LAB 33,100 S.F. SAXON DRIVE tf3 iY � �0 =vr — +§"sDECP) tc -EC j "COSTCO" P A H ` .J r O _ - :5'55Eca) SIGN EXISTING CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE Fi'4lfE�t — — EXISTING SN2t1 UGHT ♦. — — -24- _ 4!' NEW AREA UGHT EXISTING STREET LIGHT < 0 — K NEW B ® f � O O BASIN �e CLEAN OUT , NEW 8' OWS CLEAN 011T NEW GATE VALVE Q �O ss— EXISTING VENT\ � STACK TO BE RELOCATED NEW 8 INSTALL VENT CLEAN OUT— 4' SS PIPING SUMP PER EXISTING CANOPY ORAT RELOCATED VENT STACK —2 Ah Dzmo Dog' 76.56 TC 79.16 TP CONSTRUCTION NOTES LEGEND • TOPOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION IS BASED ON TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY 01/29/99— BUSH, ROED de HITCHINGS, INC. SURVEYORS — — —23-- — — 0STING CONTOURS 24 NEW CONTOURS 1 70.67 .1 NEW TOP OF CURB NEW TOP OF PAVEMENT FL = FLOW UNE ELEVATION TC = TOP OF CURB TP = TOP OF PAVEMENT IE = INVERT ELEVATION TE = TOP OF ELEVATION EL = ELECTRICAL CONDUIT WV= WATER VALVE TBM TEMPORARY BENCH MARX I ry M E • MEET EXISTING GRADES —> —) DENOTES FINAL DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION NEW AC e PAVING TOP OF ISLAND REMOVE PLANTER PROVIDE PAVING NEW CONCRETE EDGE OF CANOPY NEW CURB PER EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN EXISTING. CURB TO BE REMOVED v —CD — NEW CANOPY DRAIN USE SCH. 40 PVC OR MATCH EXISTING - - -SS -- NEW SANITARY SEWER— LATERAL NEW TRENCH DRAIN - EXISTING LANE STRIPING tO RELOCATE EXISTING AREA UGHT 2O EXISTING AREA LIGHT TO BE REMOVED 0 EXISTING AREA UGHT TO REMAIN O EDGE OF NEW AC PAVING NEW TRENCH DRAIN CANOPY ORAN SUMP SANITARY SEWER SEE SHEET OWS -1 RELOCATED AREA UGHT O ALL OPEN TRENCHES WITH ACCESS TO EXISTING STORM DRAINS SHALL BE ENCIRCLED WITH 1 ROW OF SINGLE SANDBAGS TO KEEP SEDIMENTS FROM ENTERING STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS. 10 PROVIDE SEDJ�IENT PROTECTION AT CATCH BASIN P J \ These plans have been reviewed VA the k' Works Department for conformance with current City standards. Acceptance i$ sublc ^r " "rc: s an adopt r':hich do not RUthoriz� ' .. forth . -. =rds or ordinances. T: tort).: 0t the rest. desi5-.. '101, deletions or r1 drag.'. s date te will will void and resubmh[al of r for s1: - approval. Final z:... -,..- ice is subject to - _cti0n by the Public Works utilities Inspeci, // J ) Oare. _'I��f __ e l •♦A SCALE 1° = 20' NEW PLANTER MAR 1 3 Z00 0 20 40 80 GRAPHIC SCALE 10 FEET Ga'2 223 -13 -c/D � a'1LYII!I1P:11�J•� rT ly!'t•Yi -ti■ !i0 11/1 SrI MM/MIMI LLIa "'jllSVl ilt, I:I.Yr:I. M:gYra_1, �.ur -nil 1i •.91r..1!li- �JrLY�•.M:1/..!•:1. r.rMl/ ∎MI,.I. w.a....., 1 1• rera. vl ., /111.±3sex21Mw� A MINI 4=11..l1[n-1 e ■IMMILI uMMN =.�11111111111.11., 1r'uM. MMH��7�. J\F Ml MN ME .1: q.l =: A11•T.. � . i �� 1 =i • w�MW r. �4r i s•111s0... HAM:■.■ EM�A � try MI 24.0 23.0 22.0 21.0 20.0 25.5 23.0 4.0 II 3.0 20.5 2.0 1.0 18.0 0 20 40 60 80 HORIZONTAL SCALE: 1' =20' -- --tour -9 "8E€0 - M4 n i �W LANE STRIPET32, �, 3 CB TYPE I TE =3037(4'S) �- IE = 20.17(6'S) 20.0712"Er IE = 19.97(12 "W) a 3'13 9 CB = 23.33 IE 19.63(12" E) DETAIL PER CITY OF TUKINLA S.S. MANHOLE DETAIL SS -4 ssaa, ' L. 3 - 13 w it= 14.36 IE = 18.86 (8' N) IE= 18.97(4" E) IE = 18.97 (6' W) SCALE 1' = 20' 20' 40' 60' 80' GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET - PV ' < 7 { (PARKING STALLS) 1 -STORY STONE BLDG SAXON DRIVE 1 t N f �w _,,,,- ---- , e = ve o- �� O - 15 50(Cp) 15 � - - ot eP) b I OF T rDETAIL PER CITY 1W/4U -~ ' µ '' - ,s,,,,,,,,,,__._, ?! y I CLEANOUT DETAIL SS-2, SEE e Z i ( - t - - "; _ _ , TYP. OF ( - u 9, L� , - - _ _ • LANE STRIPE j Uki, - 1 3 - co NEW I _ II ' 8" CLEAN OUT / 1 ' � ' k_ 9 60(AOS) � I I - J-4- n ) s -a' SS- i nn I 3 49' }2 ? os I NEW OIL/WATER SEPARATOR / I NEW 8" CLEAN OUT t,�re -e r ea -ss NEW GATE VALVE 4' SS P8 1160 CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE ---- "so(A - - NEW CATCH BASIN �=X pired 25.0 19.0 18.0 NOTES: 1.TOP - INDICATES TOP OF PIPE INCLUDING THE DIMENSION OF THE COUPLING OVE THE PIPE. 2. 8' SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE 8' PVC SDR 35 SOLVENT -WELC JOINTS 313�c� 3. EC = ELECTRICAL CONDUIT 4. SD = STORM DRAIN (ADS & PVC INDICATE MATERIAL) 5. RE = RIM ELEVATION 6. TC = TELEPHONE CONDUIT 7. TRENCH DRAIN CATCH BASIN, ACO MODEL N0. 650 OR EQUAL 8. INSTALL 1' CONCRETE WALL SECTION TO BRING UFO GRADE 9. OIL /WATER SEPARATOR, UTIUTY VAULT MODEL NO. 660 -SA, 450 GALLON CAPACITY. SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY GAS STATION CONTRACTOR. - zo 8" PIPE 8'04" PVC ECCENTRIC REDUCER 24" CONCRETE VALVE HOUSING BROOKS OR EQUAL OR TO BE CAST ON SITE (24'Wx24'Lx48'D MIN. -ADD RISER SECTION AS REQUIRED TO MEET EXISTING GRADE) GATE VALVE DETAIL SCALE.' NTS These plans have been reviewed by the Palle Works Department for conformance with current City stATdards_ Acceptance I5 subjcc" � ^.rrors and of th ear: - do ordinances. I a ado /: .: rds of a derAgn r es T 1 , for tK - _� e design r'::; de_: , . ss, deletions or drat. date will vo:, resubrnMal cf for _. spproval. FAX .___ - -_nee is subject to the Public Works utilities inspec...r Ode: 20 -Se 'gs onby -RIM 23.65 V.ALTERRA PVC 4" SLIDE GATE VALVE P/N 6601 OR EQUAL 4' PIPE MAR 1 3 2000 pECE1VED CITY OF TUKwItA MAR 2 1 2000 PERMIT CENTCR IRRIGATION LEGEND (NEW) SYMBOL MANUFACTURER NOME BODY DESCRIPTION/REMARKS RADIUS GPM PSI a o RAINBIRD RAINBIRD 15E5T 15SST 1812 1812 ADJUST RADIUS AS REQUIRED ADJUST RADIUS AS REQUIRED 4X15 4015 0.81 38 1.21 38 ODD.. RAINBIRD RAINBIRD RAINBIRD RAINBIRD RAINEIRD 1?; 111 tfl t11 ADJUST RADIUS AS REQUIRED ADJUST RADIUS AS REQUIRED ADJUST RADIUS AS REQUIRED ADJUST RADIUS AS REQUIRED ADJUST RAJ1i1S AS REQUIRED 1 g82 •I>.. RAINBIRD RAINBIRD RAINBIRD RAINBIRD t� 2H4 V.t ADJUST RADIUS AS REQUIRED ADJUST RALIUS' AS REQUIRED ADJUST RADIUS AS REQUIRED ADJUST RADIUS PS RED! IIPED 2.6 30 1.3 30 .87 30 .65 30 • •41.1. RAIN8180 RAINBIRD RAINBIRD RAINBIRD >2 F-0 .9:2:2F2 ADJUST RADIUS AS REQUIRED ADJUST RADIUS AS REQUIRED ADJUST RADIUS AS REQUIRED ADJUST RADIUS. AS REWIRED 2F2:2.9- .75-1.45 30 .79 30 .53 30 .39 30 PVC -CLASS 200 LATERAL =__ PVC -CLASS 200 SLEEVE SLEEVES TWICE THE DIAMETER OF PIPE INSIDE. BURIAL DEPTH. AS REQUIRED FOR PIPES. EXTEND. SLEEVES. 12' INTO PLANTING AREAS: CAP AND FLAG LOCATION': STRAIGHT RUNS ONLY. iM f'1 VALVE No. GPM CC PARCEL - _ _L 435(186) PRICE COSTCO "ICAL LAB ,100 S.F. CONNECT W/ NEW LATERAL SAXON DRIVE -® _ LB "SS_ _ � _ „-LANE STRIPE PLANE STRIPE EXISTING CAP I 3/ EXISRNG CAP EXISTING iS Uls - r II REMOVE EINI a EXIST. :26 P IRRIGATION r fik 1 I �' 3/4' 3/4' I n 11 I itai CONNECT TO r j 3 ` / �\ EXISTING SPRINKLERS TO BE REMOVED - 1 1/4 3/4 3/4' CONNECT TO EXISTING 3/4- REMOVE EXISTING SLEEVES LATERAL NEW 1W LATERAL 234 SLEEVE I REMOVE EXISTING IRRIGATION 3/4' 0 ; 3/4 3/4' 11 i I I i I LAWN I CONNECT TO EXISTING 2 PIPE I I I .4,421-1:3--, s II o o ©c II II - 1' 3/4 3 / `, 1 . 1 1/4 / REMOVE EASING IRRIGATION it -CONNECT TO EXISTING . 2DWOO9 1 1/2' 38.15 EXISTING IRRIGATION TO REMAIN EXIST 1 1/4' UNE IN A SLEEVE TO BE REMOVED 1 1 REMOVE EXISONG SPRINKLERS IN nits SECTION I Th W 3/4' 1 1/2 1 1 /4 IN 3' REMOVE SLEEVE EXIST. SLEEVES LATERAL NEW LATERAL SLEEVE 3/4 1 1/2' CONNECT TO EXISTING 0 20 40 80 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET PLANTER 1 1/2 EXIST.UNE IN A SLEEVE TO BE REMOVED 3/4' CONNECT TO EXISTING CONNECT TO EXISTING IRRIGATION LEGEND (EXISTING) SYMBOL. ITEM LAWN /SHRUB HEAD Oo LAWN /SHRUB HEAD Ma o8. LAWN /SHRUB HEAD LAWN/SHRUB HEAD LAWN /SHRUB HEAD CONTROL VALVE MAINLINE LATERALS SLEEVES MANUFACTURER RAINBIRD 1806 -12 SERIES RAINBIRD 1806 -12 SERIES RAINBIRD 1806 -12 SERIES RAINBIRD 1806 -12 SERIES RAINBIRD 1806 -12 SERIES RAINBIRD 150 -FEB PVC -CLASS 200 PVC -CLASS 200 PVC -CLASS 200 REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS (C- SHEETS) FOR GRADING INFORMATION. DESCRIPTION - REMARKS 30 PSI ADJUST RADIUS AS REQUIRED 30 PSI ADJUST RADIUS AS REQUIRED 30 PSI ADJUST RADIUS AS REQUIRED 30 PSI ADJUST RADIUS AS REQUIRED 30 PSI ADJUST RADIUS AS REQUIRED REMOTE CONTROL VALVE SIZES AS NOTED ON PLAN. (2' MIN.) SIZES AS NOTED ON PLAN OR SAME SIZE AS LARGEST ADJANCENT PIPE • SLEEVES TWICE THE DIAMETER OF PIPE INSIDE. BURIAL DEPTH AS REQUIRED FOR PIPES. EXTEND SLEEVES 12 INTO PLANTING AREAS CAP AND FLAG LOCATION. STRAIGHT RUNS ONLY. IRRIGATION REMODEL NOTES GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE: 1/4' A) RESTORATION OF EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. 8) EXTENSION OF IRRIGATION FROM PRE - EXISTING PLANTINGS INTO NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS. CA,'- 0) INSTALLATION OF SLEEVING- PP P 'I G IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OF PRIOR BUILD. THIS DESIGN IS OF REROUTING AND EXTENSION OF pp? 7 LJ Jl1 1/4 EXISTING COVERAGES CONNECT TO - EXISTING NEW WORK SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING. MATERIALS SHALL BE NEW. � CAP EXISTING THE EXISTING CONTROLLERS AND VALVES SHALL REMAIN IN USE WITHOUT CHANGE OF EQUIPMENT REMOVE OR WATERING SCHEDULE. EXISTING ALL WORK PER LOCAL CODE, INSTALLATION PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTION. IRRIGATION 1 -1/4' NEW PIPE AND 3' SLEEVE UNDER PAVING CAP EXISTING 1 -1/4' ALL VALVES TO BE PLACED IN ° CARSON ° GRADE LEVEL BOXES W/BOLT -LOCK UDS (OR APPROVE) EQUAL). SET BOXES Y HIGHER THAN FINISH GRADE. MAIN UNE PIPE TO BE BURIED 18' (24 WHERE UNDER PAVING) AND LATERALS 12' (18' WHERE UNDER PAVING) BELOW FINISH GRADE. NO ROCKS OR DEBRIS TO BE BACKFILLED OVER PIPE. VALVE, HEAD AND UNE POSITIONING IS DIAGRAMMATIC ON PLAN. ADJUST IN Fl0D AS NECESSARY FOR ADEQUATE COVERAGE. COVERAGE: LOCATE AND ADJUST HEADS SO THAT ALL PLANTER AREAS ARE PROPERLY IRRIGATE AND THERE IS COMPLETE COVERAGE. LOCATE ALL PIPING AND EQUIPMENT IN PLANTING AREAS WHERE POSSIBLE. DURING INSTALLATION OF THE WORK, NOTE ANY LOCATIONS OF EXISTING IRRIGATION INFRASTRUCTURE AND CLEARLY NOTE ON NEW AS- BUILTS TO INCORPORATE ALL IRRIGATION ON THE PROJECT FOR OWNER'S USE. FAMIUARIZE FACIUTY OPERATOR WITH IRRIGATION SYSTEM FUNCTION, CONTROLLER PROGRAMING, SYSTEM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS. AFTER INSTALLATION OF THE NEW IRRIGATION, RUN THE ENTIRE SYSTEM THOUGHOUT THE SITE, FROM THE CONTROLLER, TO MAKE SURE THAT WHERE IS CONTINUITY TO ALL ZONES. FLUSH THE ENTIRE 3/4' SYSTEM, MAKING SURE THAT THERE ARE NO CONTAMINANTS WHATSOEVER IN THE NEW OR EXISTING PIPING. FECEI ED 0116 OFT " 16 ADJUST ALL IRRIGATION HEADS TO PROVIDE MAXIMUM COVERAGE, MINIMUM OVERSPRAY AND NO FOGGING. SET ALL HEADS BACK FROM CURBS, PAVING AND WALLS A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES. MAR 2 1 2000 MAR 1 0 2000 VARIATION OF THEIR LOCATION ON THE PLAN IS ONLY FOR THE SAKE OF GRAPHIC CLARITY. REPAIR ALL PLANTING AREAS DISTURBED BY IRRIGATION MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING SYSTEM AND INSTALLATION OF NEW SYSTEM. VERIFY THE EXISTENCE OF AN AUTOMATIC SHUTOFF DEVICE. IF NONE EXISTS PROVIDE A RAIN BIRD RAIN CHECK SHUTOFF DEVICE. IF NONE EXISTS. PROVIDE A RAIN BIRD RAIN CHECK SHUTOFF DEVICE AT A LOCATION ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER. SUBSTITUTION OF IRRIGATION MATERIAL/EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MADE ONLY UPON WRITTEN APPROVAL OF OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. CAP AND ABANDON (OR REMOVE) ALL IRRIGATION PIPING AND SLEEVING FROM PORTION OF EXISTING IRRIGATOR SYSTEM IRRIGATOR SYSTEM TO BE ABANDONED. EXISTING VALVES AND WIRING MAY BE REUSED PROVIDED THEY ARE FREE FROM DEFECTS OR DAMAGE. SALVAGE USED SPRINKLERS AND OFFER TO OWNER FOR SPARE PARTS 5ER m , z+irtl Q H Z 5 FUEL FACILITY INSTALLATION RRIGATION 8 "SS(CP) - - - - -® L8 "SS_ _ O ✓ LANE STRIPE 0 S � 4 "COSTCO" PARCEL t I II h EXISTING PRICE COSTCO OPTICAL LAB 33,100 S.F. J SAXON DR a iLANE STRIPE ' ss- EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN 1■ 4 k . % yak i -r767 w,. NOV I II EXISTING LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN «000O9 Elpire4 .-o-0- ss- I1 o ID o o , I I Q =1 O I Z T I REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPING - r EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN 110 EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN EXISTING TREES TO BE RELOCATED (TYP) SCALE 1• = 20' EXISTING LANDSCAPE r TO REMAIN 0 20 40 80 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET EXISTING HEADER BOARD BETWEEN LAWN AND PLANTER. NEW HEADER BOARD, MATCH EXISTING NOTES OBTAIN AND PAY FOR ALL SPECIAL PERMITS AND FEES AS REQUIRED FOR LANDSCAPE WORK (PLANTING AND IRRIGATION). PROVIDE PROTECTION OF ALL PROPERTY, PERSONS, WORK —IN— PROGESS, STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, WALKS, CURBS, AND PAVED SURFACES. VERIFY THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO DIOGINC AND PROTECT SAID UTILITIES. REMOVE WASTE ASPHALT PAVING, ROCK AND GRAVEL, CONCRETE , AND OTHER WASTE MATERIALS AND ROUGH GRADE 8 BELOW TOP OF CURBS. COORDINATE AND SCHEDULE ALL LANDSCAPING WITH THE WORK OF OTHER TRADES. SEE THE COMPLETE PROJECT'. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WHICH MAY AFFECT LANDSCAPE WORK, SUCH AS INSURANCE, CLEAN -UP, PROJECT UMITS, ONGOING'. USE. OF THE SITE BY THE PUBLIC, AND GENERAL CONDITIONS. NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT PROMPTLY AND IN WRITING UPON BECOMING AWARE OF ANY ERROR, DISCREPANCY, OMISSION, OR CIRCUMSTANCE(S) WHICH MIGHT PREVENT OR COMPROMISE THE SATISFACTORY COMPLETION OF THE LANDSCAPE WORK. DO NOT PROCEED UNTIL ANY SUCH MATTERS ARE RESOLVED. ALL NEW LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED , .TEE L -1. PROVIDE 6 TOPSOIL (THREE— WAY —MIX OVER ALL AREAS TO BE PLANTED AND AS PLANTING MIX BACK —FILL IN TREE WELLS. PLANT GROUND COVER AS SCHEDULED TO COVER IN ALL PLANTING BEDS, INCLUDING UNDERNEATH ALL TREES AND SCHRUBS. MULCH ALL NEW LANDSCAPED AREAS WITH 2" OF MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING . MAINTAIN ALL LANDSCAPE WORK UNTIL ACCEPTANCE. GUARANTEE ALL PLANT MATERIALS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER. IF EXISTING PLANTS ARE RELOCATED, THEY SHALL BE GUARANTEED AS IF NEW STOCK. PLANT LEGEND SYMBOL BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME All D • 1 Acer rubrum 'Red Sunset' Red Maple Gledltsia triacanthos 1 shade master honey locust Pyres. calleryana Aristocrat' ARISTOCRAT PEAR Pines sylvestris SCOTCH PINE Osmonthus heterophyllus OSMANTHUS ® Prunus L 'Zabellana ZABEL LAUREL ® Rhododendron 'Unique UNIQUE RHODODENDRON ® Abel. grand1floro 'Edward toucher' EDWARD GOUCHER ABEUA O Ilex crenate 'Green Island' GREEN ISLAND JAPANESE HOLLY • Nandlna Domestica 'campacta HEAVENLY BAMBOO A Vince minor VINCA Sodded lawn to match existing EXISTING TREE EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED OTY SIZE / CONDOTON /REMARKS 2 1 -1/2- CA. Min 10' -12' HT., WELL BRANCHED, B/8 4 1 -1/2' Cal. MIn 10' -12' H0, WELL BRANCHED, 8/B 2 1 -1/2" CAL M!N., 10' -12' HT., WELL BRANCHED. B / B 6' -7' Min. HT., FULL TO GROUND 0/8 SPACING AS SHOWTI ON PLAN. 10 MIn. 18 "— 24" HT., SPREAD, DENSE SPECIMENS, B/B OR CONTAINER, SPACING AS SHOWN 23 MIn. 18 24 HT., SPREAD, DENSE SPECIMENS, B/B QR CONTAINER, SPACING AS SHOWN 3 MIn. 18 24" HT., SPRT AD, DENSE SPECIMENS, B/8 OR CONTAINER 10 Min. 15"— 18" SPREAD, DENSE SPECIMENS, B/B OR CONTAINER 60 Min. 18"— 24" HT.,SPREAD, DENSE SPECIMENS, 6/B OR CONTAINER., SPACING AS SHOWN 7 Min. 18" — 24" HT.,SPREAD, DENSE SPECIMENS, 0/B OR CONTAINER., SPACING AS SHOWN 4" POTS 0 18" O.C. TRIANGULAR SPACING FIRST ROW 12" FROM Ca% OR EDGE OF PLANTER Cm OF MAR 2 2000 MAR 1 3 2000 PERMIT ED ER 0 z a N 0 z 0 0 KEYNOTES --x _� '' •' AREHOUSE. No. 6 TU KW I LA WA T 0 EY.ISTIN6 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE DISPENSER ® EXISTING CONCRETE PLANTER CURB TO REMAIN. 2 HEW APm CIV CON IL DW65CRETE CURB AND PLANTER. SEE LANDSCAPE 0 PIF.W CON,, m WALKWAY. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS. 0 NEW PARK. STRIPING. MATCH EXISTING. PARKING STRIPING, DOUBLE STRIPING. 2 U �ATIR6 N OF,,,E9TTORAGEaTFNK5 :ALL P.R. /. (2) 20,00061•L. REGULAR UNLEADED (I) 20,000 6AL. SUPREME UNLEADED . E UNDERGROUND 0 NEW MULTI- •PRL'GT DISPENSER SE STORAGE 7A.NK OD DRAWIH65. 2 NEW b° HIGH CONCRETE ISLAND PER PLAN. C NEW CONCRETE SLAB. THICKNESS AND REINFORCEMENT PER STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL DN.. I0 EXISTING CATCH BASIN. U LVAI ■I NY II NEW CATCH BASIN. S. CIVIL D.S. • R C H I T E C T S El RELOCATED WENT STACK. 13 EXISTING SITE AREA LIGHT TO REMAIN 14 RELOCATED SITE AREA LIGHT. IS NEW 517E AREA LIGHT .�� n _... .•. _ , s ev. .. •..... r 16 EXISTING CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE. IT NEW CANOPY. SEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, SHEET A -2.1, FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, AND DETAIL FOR REFLECTED CEILING PLAN. El EXISTING BOLLARD. I9 IJEW "STOP" SIGN. SEE DEThI: g NEW TRAFFIC CONTROL STRIPING, REPER TO DETAIL, 21 NEW PAINTED TRAFFIC ARROW. SEE DETAIL 22 NEW PAIN7ED TRAFFIC TURN ARROW. SEE MTN ❑23 NEW PAINTED 'DO NUT ENTER SIGN" SEE DETAIL g 24 NEW PAINTED 'STOP SIGN" SEE DETAIL 25 NEW FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH BREAK HAMMER. 26 EXISTING EMERGENCY SHUT OFF SWITCH. g NEW BOLLARD. SEE. DETAIL g EXISTING TRAFFIC COPITROL STRIPING TOO jis REMOVED, SANDBLAST. 29 NEW "DO NOT ENTER'... SEE DETAIL PS, NEW WASTE CAN BOLTED DOPFL SO.i L. B PEW ABSORBENCY CONTAINER CONCRETE PAD. SEE 52 PEW LATTICE SCREEN FENCING. SEE DETAIL u EXISITIN6 PARKING STRIP!. MATCH NEW 5 INS TO THIS. 2 '"i EXISTING MULTI- PROD.CT DISPENSER. 4T EXIST. FIRE EXTIPGUISFER 235 EXISTING 6" HIGH CONCRETE ISLAND. El €X1571. CANOPY. IJ NEW STRIP DRAIN. SEE CIVIL DWG.. g EXIST. H ELR LINE C EXIST. WASTE CAN 38 NEW RAMP. `.SEE CIVIL DRAWIN65. EXIST. SIGN TO 8E REMOVED. EXISTING CONCRETE SLAB. g .., 0!U WATER SEPERATOR SUPPLIED t INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS. 51 iv WIDE "STOP BAR', MECHANICALLY APPLIED PAINT, (2) COATS TRAFFIC 41 NEW CANOPY 'DRAIN SUMP LIPS WHITE 42 NOT USED ® EXISTING PAINTED TRAFFIC ARROW TO BE REMOVED, SANDBLAST . EXISTING PAINTED ° DO NOT ENTER SIGN" TO BE REMOVED, SANDBLAST. g � NOT USED I'__I EXISTING PAINTED TRAFFIC NW 6 STRAIGHT ARROW TO EE SANDBLASTED, THEN REPWNNED OVER. REFER TO GASOLINE SIGNAGE TABLE ON SHEET A -2.1 GENERAL NOTES A. ALL WORK, MATERIALS METHODS, ETC. SHALL CONFORM TO ALL GOVERN. BUILDING CODES, REGULATIONS AND AGENCIES. PROTECTION BARRICADES; B. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN OR VEHICULAR TEMPORARY GUARD RAILS AND /OR CANOPIES AS RLCMIIRED BY FOR PEDESTRIAN L;ITN ill Il.,, :. E D G P (' RI,:) ' '` ' THE LOCAL AUTHORITIES OR A5 NECESSARY AND VEHICULAR SAFETY. C. SEE CIVIL DRAWINEfi FOR ERA ING AND DRAINAGE 5 'nQZ• INFORMATION. PR D. SEE SHEET A-2.1 FOR CANOPY ELEVATIONS, SIGN DETAILS, AND CANOPY MATERIALS. E. SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR PLANTING AND IRRIGATION Psj , INFORMATION. F. THE DEVELOPERS NAME ADDRE_IS AND PHONE NUMBER TO BE . . RCHTCT: JERRY a LEE CONSPICUOUSLY POSTED AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE DURING ALL PHA.S OF CONSTRUCTION. G. 6. REFER TO ENLARGED PLANS AND DETAILS, SHEETS A -2.1, A -9.I, 6 ' A-4.I FOR CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE INFORMATION AND CANOPY REFLECTED CEILING PLAN. MO 'REGISt: NED H. SEE UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK DRAWINGS FOR PETROLEUM PIPING RUNS AND ELECTRICAL CONDUIT RUNS FOR C Gr UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS AND DISPENSERS. ALL ELECTRICAL RUNS ARE SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY. TH° BEST lE QUINN! _Et + Y _ Et CONNECTION ROUTE SHOULD BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD AUTO INSTALLED PER NATIONAL, STATE AND LOCAL CODE GH It' u iNs, Si UP I R €LNIREMENTS. I. ALL ELECTRICAL CONDUIT OR CABLE, WHERE SUBJECT TO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 24" COVER. % n °•_, .. " =s ,«�,,._, • ° a : _- •. "•r M =,2,,. T J. SEE ELECTRICAL DR./.. G FOR SITE ELECTRICAL AND CONTROLLER ENC... ELECTRICAL PANELS K. ITEMS NOTED AS (E) ARE. EXISTING TO REMAIN CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND /OR REPLACE, AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE, /I3/00 SUaM.TTED FOR'ERMN ANY EXISTING FACILITIES TO REMAIN THAT ARE DAMAGED BY •/25/00 RESUBMITTED FOR PERMIT CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS. 25/00 S.,BMITTED FOR BID L. VERIFY DIMENSIONS, LINES, GRADES, ELEVATIONS, AND SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. NOTIFY MULVANNY /15/00 0 RESUBMIT FOR PERMIT IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. M. A CLEARLY LABELED MANUALLY OPLRATED FL. MASTER SWITCH SHALL BE PROVIDED IN AN APPROVED LOCATION, WITHIN SEVENTY -FIVE C15) FEET OF, BUT NOT NEARER THAN TWENTY FIVE (25) FEET TO ANY DISPENSER WHERE SUCH MASTER SWITCH IS NOT VISIBLE FROM ALL DISPENSERS. THE LOCATION THEREOF SHALL BE INDICATED BY APPROVED GS.. N. SIGNS IDENTIFYING THE PUMP MASTER SWITCH SHALL BE LABELED EMERGENCY PROP SHUTOFF. RECEIVED AOJECT NUMBER: CRY OF TUK ITV, 95.0 /aC 0. A FIRE EXTINGUISHER WITH A MINIMUM CLASSIFICATION OF 2A40BC SHALL BE PROVIDED AND SO LOCATED THAT IT WILL ROJCCT kANAGER RY P ' WAR 2 1 2000 NOT BE MORE THAN SEVENTY -FIVE (T5) PEET FROM ANY PUMP, DISPENSER, OR FILL-PIPE OPENING. LOCATE PER FIRE DRAWING DATE 225/00 RE31417 CCHTEA DEPARTMENT. 0111 EMENTS. DRAWING PEENAME 507 .t P. ALL PAVING OR CONCRETE THAT IS DESTROYED OR REMOVED AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION IS TORE REPLACED OR PATCHED BY TIE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER THAT WOULD MATCH C O STC O OR IMPROVE THE CONDITION OP THE EXSTM6 .PAVING SAWCUT ALL PAVEMENT EDGES PRIOR TO INSTALL!. ADJACENT WHOLESALE PAVEMENT. DOWEL CONCRETE SURFACES WITH . DOWSLS AT 18 O.G. SEE DETAILS REFERENCED ON RAN W H$E No. b 1151 SAXON DRVE O. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE AM PROTECTIVE MEASURES TUKWIM, WA 98.88 AND EXERCISE 'EXTREME CAUTION WHEN TRENCHING SITE IN ORDER TO AVOID DAMAO. EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. AI, DAMAGE TO EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S FIELD VERIFICAT A ND CODRDI NATIdN. EXPENSE OSTCO GASOLINE 517E CONDITIONS ARE DETAIL SITE PLAN 1. SLRVEI' DIMENSIONS' DIMENSIONS OF FROM SURVEY BY OTHERS. THE ARCHITECT BEARS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACCURACY OF SAME. 2. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATION: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OP THE SIZE AND LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES. .157. UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN OBTAINED PROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AND ARE SHOWN FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY. T. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL p L '1. TTY LOCATIONS NOT SHOWN. CARE SHOULD BEE TAKEN TO A YOID DAMAGE OR DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING UTILITIES. THE , ^` _ .1 CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING ANY DAMAGE TO THE UTILITY. 12 E 21' DETAIL SITE PLAIN p SCALE: I" IO'�° 5074CX1 L (B) TIP. (TYPJ 0 5 10 20 4B 28 51 (5)TYP. E Y 4 STALLS 119'0 9 STALLS AT q'-0 40' I r LJ T a,11,_Lai ° .E _t E � —tf IJ 15' D&o 9 (2) T. LJ (EXIST) (EXIST) L`J fE: 3fsi■isoeE'AI: LIE imam. Mf Ei XItAMIE f1 S.O.I.C,— GASOLINE SIGNAGE QTY. DESCRIPTION TYPICAL PLACEMENT O b MEMBERS ONLY/ENTER HERE lx/COSTCO L000,.16 11 X24" ALUM. METAL POST EA. SIDE ON ENTRANCE(S) SEE DETAIL I/A -4.1 ® 1 PLEASE PULL TO F ORWARD PUMP 24" x 24" ALUM. END OF NEW ISLAND FACING INCOMING TRAFFIC O NENI POSIT. NUMBER, REFER WRONG WAY 24" x 24" ALUM. END OF NEW ISLAND FACING EXIT ® DEBIT /CREDIT ONLY, NO GASH ACCEPTED 12" x 12" ALUM. 1 TOP OF NEW DISPENSER FACING TRAFFIC ION NEW CANOPY COLUMN FACING TRAFFIC O —5- IICLr LINO ' x G" ALUr1. 3'HRCC SIDES Or CENTER CALL'tit ADOVC r! ONE © 1 NO SMOKING/STOP ENGINE 16" x 24" ALUM, 2 SIDED HUNG FROM BRACKET ON INSIDE OF NEW LEADING COLUMN (CLOSEST TO OUTGOING TRAFFIC) ® + 3GNS- I9" x 21" ,LEE, 2 SIDED ® 19" . 24" ALUt 1, I -, ,!DCD SHUT 0, VISIDLC 7,044 TIC Mt 1rS. ® 4 CLEARANCE SIGN 6 ".x'..IB" ALUM. MOP,. ON CANOPY FASCIA BY CANOPY SUPPLIER EACH SIDE OF CANOPY FOR INGOIN6 6 OUTGOING TRAFFIC O 4 COSTGO GASOLINE LOGO 30" DECALS ON UPPER EDGE OF NEW Y,'HITE METAL DISPENSER PANEL FACING FUELING POSITION II 4 MEMBERS ONLY 1 1/2 x 9/2" PLASTIC ON NEW DISPENSERS TO COVER MID -6RADE FUEL OPTION 0 2 GOSTCO GASOLINE IV x I' -9" VINYL LETTERS CENTER 516NA6E ON SOUTH AND WEST SIDES OF EXPANDED CANOPY FASCIA C> ACCEPTED DEBIT/ CREDIT CARDS DECAL TO LEFT OF 'GRIND' CAW READER ON NEW DISPENSER 4 STATIC ELECTRICIT WARNING 4" x II" DECAL TO RIGHT OP LCD DISPLAYS ON NEW DISPENSER IS HOURS OF OPER., OPEN/CLOSED VINYL BELOW "SELF - SERVICE S16NAGE, ON SIDE OF THE NEW DISPENSER FACING TRAFFIC AT ENTRY. 0 i I V GASH ON PREMISES VNYL MOUNT C CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE, NEAR DOOR KEYNOTES h EI F!EW PAINTED META FASCIA PAPEL, COLOR: t0 MA TLM EX (SEE KEYNOTE II). O EX.I5TIN6 CANOPY FASCIA w rl/,fr,' UBBLE "516NI ITFR ", i0 BF REI_- ELATED BY 6C SEF D`r RAIL --3_ 'H E NEW MULTI - PRODUCT DISPENSER. 36 W Y. 94 X 32D ❑q NEW CONCRETE- FILLED METAL FORMED 6L'A.RD AT END OF ISLAND. TO. GUARD 6 30' ABOVE TRAFFIC SRFACE. PAINT W/ INDUSTRIAL ENAMEL GLOSS BLLE PAINT "LAPIS LAA'LI" (51 NENI POSIT. NUMBER, REFER WAREHOUSE. N o. 6 T U KW I LA, WA ELEC TAIG AL DRAWIN65 FOR'E/.A.GT DISPENSER tUNE. . E6 NEW RAI5ED CONCRETE ISLAND WITH METAL EDGE FORM, PANT THE SIDES ONLY GLO. BLACK (59 1001) E NEW WASTE RECEPTOR, B°✓LT DOWN, CENTER OF EACH ISLAND. S.O.I.C, E9 NEW STEEL TUBE COLUMN WITH SPLIT -FACE MASOF''RY BLOCK -. ' TO MATCH EXISTING. (SEE KEYNOTE 12). SEE STRL'GTiLRAL DRAWINGS AMD DETAiL FOR LMIJ . Y M V LV A ��--II 3. 0 NOT USED. A R C H I" E C T S IO NOT USED. II EXISTING PAINTED METAL FASCA PANEL, COLOR: IPGI06 -910 5-I 3-' -v ''e sums -: uu" sT,",,.e 'osav .. °. ANSI 1O GREY. I2 EXISTING STEEL TUBE .L241 WITH SPLIT -FACE MASONRY BLOCK E CMU COLOR MUTUAL MATERIALS CO. ...OWN. ":'.L .',. "` I3 NOT L.D. 2 EXISITSIG MULTI - PRODUCT DISPENSER TO REMAIN. IS EXISTING CONCRETE-FILLED META_ FORMED GUARD AT END OF ISLAND. 2 EXISTING VIDEO CAMERA TO BE RELOCATED. E RELOCATED VIDEO CAMERA. 19 EXISTING SI0.IAGE TO BE RELOCATED. 19 RELOCATED FASCIA LIGHT FI%TLRE, 14..LE. GENERAL NOTES A. SEE SHEET A -I FOR ADDITIONAL GE ER, ,.OYES. B. SEE ENLARGED SITE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL DETAIL REFERENCES. / I'_0" 3' 6" 4-6 14 -0' 4' -6" 3,... I -0" h r (---- Y ry O EAST SIDE ELEVATIONS (WEST ELEVATION AIM,) SCALE: I/4" _I ■ E O SOUTH END ELEVATION SCALE: I /4" O STANDARD DISPENSER ISLAND LAYOUT FRONT ELEV. SCALE: 1/2". 2 2 2. 3: I4' -O" T k 4s 32, PLEAS! PULL TO ONWAR[ PUMP ENTRANCE ELEV. GASOLINE DISPENSER ELEVATIONS O J m 2 v -/ EXIT ELEV. E gso O .' FRONT ELEV. A STANDARD RED "SAFETY RED SW 4091 SIDE ELEV B O-CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE PLAN WALE: I/4'.1 16'-0' �Il�u !dN�d� nioil�Nl STANDARD EL. "LAPIS LAZULI" SW 1905 OQ�s CANOPY SIGN DETAIL +•/ 3 /b' J -o. 1040303P SIDE ELEV. G -ALL WOOD I , BE REDWOOD WITH O N TRAM ARENT C Y FINIS.!! ONAINI'46 U.V. PROTECTION -ALL FASTENING MATERIAL TO BE STAINLESS STEEL PER PLAN SCREEN FENCE DETAIL AND ELEVATION SCALE: I/2" =PTO SIGN TO BE RELOCATED ON WEST AND BOL. SIDE OF CANOPY ONLY. O 3 EXISTING CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS WITH NEW LATTICE SCREEN SCALE:I /4 ".I 2X6 GAP w/1 /4° EASED Epees LATTICE RECEIVER TOP RAIL - MATERIAL TO BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY 6.C. AND APPROVED BY ARCHITECT LATTICE PANELS ARCHITECTURAL GRADE OTR. ROUND TYPICAL BOTH SIDES LATTICE RECEIVER BASE RAIL x4 POST APP GRADE CONCRETE SLAB 4x4 POST ANCHOR EMBEDDED IN CONS. SLAB WDOO ire.d 4 12'-0" REVISED 1/4/99 ARCHITECT: JERRY O. LEE 2/75/00 2/75/00 3,'15/00 QUINN .EF LSTAT '!E WASHINGTt;: 1/16/00 SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT RESUBMITTED FOR FERMI" SUBMIT' .^. FOR 30 A RES'U'BMITTED FOR PERMIT ECkIVEO PROJECT NUMBER: CfiY OF T:'" PROJECT MANAGER: MAR 2 1 2000 RV DRAWING DATE: 2/75/00 DRAWING FILENAME: 507FC"2 COSTCO WHOLESALE WH..SE. No.6 1151 SAXON DRIVE 'L(WIIA, WA 98188 COSTCO GASOLINE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS & DETAILS A -2.1 • P:pl, -1115, 8 55,1 I.15MYP., "EN SIGN. P3 TYP,` REIOGAIED VIDEO CAMERA IIEW SCOTTSDALE LIGHT FIXTURE WITH FOLK (4) SHIELDS PER FIXTUP.E. F OI, (4) NEW ROOF PANELS PER STRUCTURAL (TYP) NEW BEAM PER STRLK,T. (TYP) HEW DRAIN LATERAL FROM REP.IHRTER 6LRT'R TJ FFLE OF COLUMN, 5,8 HEW TS ON TOP OF R.RLINES, SEE 5-I (TYFF) OUTLINE OF NEW ISLAND AT GRADE BELOW RELOCATED VIDEO CAMERA NEW SCOTTSDALE LIGHT FIXTURE WITH LONE SHIELDS (4 TYP) RELOCATED HASSLE 51. LIGHTER, CENTER OVER NEW SIGN. (3 TYP) NEW RRLE15 WELDED TO BOTTOM OE BEAM, SEE sTRL'Cr O CANOPY ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/4 " =1' -0" (TYP) (TYP) O CANOPY REFLECTED CEILING PLAN SCALE: 1/4 " =1' -0" HABBELL T5ONLITER" FIXTURE HEAVY CONDUIT SUPPORTS AT 96" OL CONNECT TO TOP OF FASCIA • SIGN LETTERS, SEE DET.e9 a. ROLL FORMED GUTTER DECKING 32'_0' NEW CANOPY FACIA SION LIGHTING ENSIFEERIN6 FOR SIZE AND SECTION TO RESIST LOADING BY CANOPY SUPPLIER !650104, 32' J" 21 J" I4 -6' MIN. CLR. VTO PAVEMENT 6 i/2' RF. FASCIA (ROLL FORMED) WATER TIGHT 0 SCREENED GUTTER TO DRAIN CONNECTION BY CANOPY MFG, 4' DIA. P.V.L. PIPE LATERAL, SLOPE 2. BUMPER END 4` DIA. P.V.C. DRAIN SLOPE 2., CONNECT TO NEAREST STORM DRAIN: SEE CIVIL DRW6'S FOR DETAILS/LOCATION FOR PRODUCT PIPING ! CONDUIT, I SEE T 4 E DRW65. 4" DIA. P.V.C. DRAM SLOPE 2., CONNECT TO NEAREST STORM DRAIN. SEE CIVIL DRAGS FOR DETAILS/LOCATI SECTION PLAN rm TLRE SHOWN APPROX. �p\ 5EE SI FOR CALL OUTS P": 1 4" DIA. P.VL. DRAIN • M T5 COLUMN • PER STRUCT. 4 II O 0 0 CANOPY DRAIN PIPE DETAIL \:"../1/4".1 RELOCATED HANLE SIGN LIGHTER, CENTER OVER NEW SIGN. RELOCATED HASSLE SON LIGHTER, FOLD OVER CANOPY REMOVEABLE CLAMP • TOP, BOTTOM, S CENTER OF LEADER ST CM) MAKE comeCTIOH WITH SS. CLAMPS 6 SLEEVE TOP OF ISLAND REINFORCED CO.. FOOTING, SEE SI FOR FOOTING • COLUMN ANCHORAGE 11/2" CLEAR OF SUMP SIDE 32 32 0. 16' -O' HASSLE SIGN LIGHTER. TO BE RELOCATED EXISTING VIDEO CAMERA AND HUBBLE FIXTURE TO SE RELOCATED - -... HABBLE SIGN LIGHTER, TO BE RELOCATED -.. •• Q DO NOT GROUT AT TES 115 VERT. LAP 3O" TO TO DOWELS 113 TIES AT 16b <. 55'-0" EXISTING EST, EXISTING REMOVE SHELL AT THIS CELL As SN0WN DO NOT GROUT PLAN ® COLUMN DETAIL D76030 4M •5 DOV✓EL5 EA. CORNER E! ; { 6 zBX 16 CORNER / /--- RETURN CMU TYP. T5 COLUMN AT .:=:7 -■ f OF MASONRY WRAP A 5. STRUCTURAL —DRAIN PIPE SOLID GROUT ALL CELLS MO. 5F" VEST. FULL NT. OF DOW LAP 30' TO DOWEL DRAIN PIPE TS COLUMN. SEE '.,STRUCTURAL 6•5•16 CORNER RETURN CMU TYP. k5z L .._ EA. CORNER TYP. OF (4) PER COLUMN PROJECT 30" ABOVE TOP OF ISLAND. EMBED. I I' MIN. INTO PAD FOOTING I REMOVE SHELL AT THIS CELL AS SHOWN DO NOT GROUP ALTERNATE COURSE PAD FOOTING SEE STRUCTURAL SCHEMATIC PLAN EXISTING ROOF PANELS PER STRICILRAL T5 ON TOP OF FERLINS, PER 5TRllCT. (TYP) / /.- �EX1571t16 SLOTTSDALE LIGHT FIXTURE EXISTING DRAIN LATERAL FROM PERIMETER SURER TO FACE OF COLUMN. EXISTING HLBBI.F. SI6t1 I� LIGHTER TO REMAIN EXISTING VIDEO CAMERA EXIST. IS ON TOP OF FAUNS, e� EXISTING ROOF PANELS EXISTING BEAM (TYP) OUTLINE OF EXISTING ISLA. AT GRADE BELOW EXISTING H180LE SIGN LIGHTER TO REMAIN EXISTING VIDEO �� CAMERA BELOW EXI5TIN6 FURLING WELDED TO BOTTOM OF BEAM EXISTING DRAIN LATERAL FROM PERIMETER surra2 TO FACE OF COLUMN 7J 2WY() O9 0 WAREHOUSE. No. 6 TUKWILA, WA MU LVANNY A R C H I T E C T S ARCHITECT: PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT MANAGER: DRAWING DATE: DRAWING FILENAME: •:u� 1/13/00 SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT PQQ 225/00 RESUBM,ED FOR PERMIT - / 225/00 SUBMITTED FORBID 3/15/00 Q RESUBMITTED FOR FERMI. 111 OF TUNIV11.5 074C MAR 2 1 2000 '1 =1�un :8,33,3 2/25/00 5074C33 -• COSTCO WHOLESALE WHSE. N'o.6 1151 SAXON DRIVE TUKWILA, WA 98186 !ERRV GLEE SEGTIONA -A COSTCO GASOLINE CANOPY REFL. CLG. PLAN & DETAILS TOTTER ISOMETERIG O CANOPY OVERELGW DETAILS A-3.1 : : N.T.S. 6 • FRONT SIDE STANDARD BALK SIDE COMPACT © "STOP " AND "DO NOT ENTER" SIGNS .ALE In " I' -O' !030005 PARKING STALLS, TYPICAL SCALE, /5'-I' -O' 02760003 PAINTED DETAIL SCALE 3/5 "ENTER ONLY" SIGN DIRECTIONAL ARROW 02760010 O SCALE, V2 -0' 10430006 ONE WAY SIGN WALE, I /2 -0' Magi PROVIDE WHITE PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROW AT ALL LOCATIONS INDICATE" ON SITE PLAN PROVIDE WHITE PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROW AT ALL LOCATIONS INDICATED ON SITE PLAN DIRECTIONAL TURN ARROW MECHANICALLY APPLIED PAJNT (2) COATS TRAFFIC LIFE WRITE ...TER, WTNR WAJELIDU9B MANASBE.. Irr SWIMS SI4CtD BE YELLOW IN SNOWFALL AREAS ^r fi 1M MITI= TRA,C CONTROL STRIPE. AT ALL LOCATIONS INDICATED ON SITE PLAN. REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR RADIUS OF Q1RVID LINE., TRAFFIC CONTROL STRIPING 10430007 SCALE, V2 , I' -0' 51. 6L. TO =aRFl-Y R I INSTALL BRASS 6RDMMET (AS RE2D.) DET. "X" STAINLESS STEEL L.K Ca9 LIIKFAS TEtID1 (BY btJ O SIGN BRACKET DETAIL I4 SCALE: 1 1 /2" 02760011 02760016 CASE OF FIRE OR SPILL 1 Use emergency pump shutoff! 2. Report the occident! Fire . Department: Call 911 `Facilty address: 6L. SHALL . MOUNT SI. BRACKET ON CANOPY COLUMN WITH (6) APPROPRIATE FASTENERS &vireo' D2nou 009 GUARD POST SCALE, 05505002 WAREHOUSE. No. 6 TUKWILA, WA MU LVANNY ARCH' -ECTS ARCHITECT: 1/13/00 2/25/00 JERRY G. LEE SUMMED FOR PERMIT RESUBMITTED FOR PERMIT 2/25/00 SIAM'" . FOR BID 3/15/00 pi RESUBMITTED FOR PERMIT RECEIyC ` PROJECT NUMBER: 949 2 1111 95.0/4C PROJECT MANAGER: Rv MI' DRAWING DATE " ' " 2/25/00 DRAWING FILENAME, 5074Ca. COSTCO WHOLESALE NO5E. No.6 1151 SAXON DRIVE .4WIW, WA 98188 COSTCO GASOLINE DETAILS A -4.1 • ',_ 112x30 ,.... .o-�b I ' -- CEILING JOIST 112x30 i r, /STRUT TO V ` CEILING JOIST -TS 836x5/16 COLUMN TYP. OF (2) .o-,bi r I/6 \TOP FLANGE _ � ), CEILING JOIST � 76 N. 112x30 CEILING 3015T ► BRpG T YV (n! , T ve > < EILIN 12x30 CEILING JOIST N t5F H1 h C.W QV 112x30 H CEILING JOIST IN/1/1/Mr REMOVE (EJ FASCIA 3 / 0• x 9 ' 50. SPLICE RATE EACH DE OF BOLT'S / � I (E) CEILING JOIST SI 13/16 HOLES IN ll CANOPY FRAMING PLAN SCALE . I /4• = 5/16 SECTION SCALE 3 /4' =1' -0' �— PROPOSED 32' -0' LONG \ 112x30 CEILING JOIST CEILING PANEL NOT SHOWN NOTES I. EXISTING CANOPY WAS DESIGNED ORIGINALLY BY GMA FOR THIS PROPOSED EXPANSION ( GMA JOB NO. 47.121 ). 2. DESIGN WADS. ROOF SNOW LOAD = 25 PSF « DRIFT, WIND = 80 MPH, EXPOSI.RE C. SEISMIC ZONE 3, 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. SEE 501L5 REPORT O915-036-IO DATED O7/10/96 AND REPORT * 0975- 046 -10 DATED 0 BY GEO ENGINEERS. ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARN6 WAD = 1500 PSF r I/3 INCREASE, FRICTION = 035, PASSIVE _ 3.00 PGF, SOIL PROFILE TYPE = 5E ASSUMED. 3. CONCRETE. 2500 P51 29-DAY GOMPR - DIVE STRENGTH, 55 SACKS PER CUBIC YARD. (NO SPECIAL INSPECTION). 4. REISFORGIN6 STEEL SHALL BE ASTM A615 GRADE 60 DEFORMED BARS. 5. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE FABRICATED AND ERECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AISG SPE GIFICATION FOR DESIGN, FABRGATON, AND ERECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR BUILDINGS. WIDE FLANGE STEEL SHAPES, PLATES AND - ANGLES SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A3&, FY = 36 K51. STRUCTURAL TUBING SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A5O0, GRADE B. WILDING. SHALL CONFORM TO A1-45 CODE FOR ARC AND 6A5 WELDIt IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION, EIOXX ELECTRODES. A307 ALL- THREAD ANCHOR BOLTS. 6. CEILING PANELS, 22 GAUGE 'GRAN FRIX PANEL BY ALUMET eiJILDINS PRODUCTS, INC. PANELS ARE AFPROX. 32' -0' W. 5EE DTL. II,S -I FOR ATTACHMENT. NT. 7. 5EE ARCHITECTURAL FOR STORM DRAINAGE. HEAT TAPE (BY OTHERS) MUST BE USED IN GUTTERS. ALL BASE RATE ELEVATIONS TO BE THE SAFE. COORDINATE FINAL ELEVATION WITH FABRICATOR / ERECTOR EXISTING CANOPY ! PROPOSED EXPANSION SEE NOTE 1 STEEL EDGE FORMS WITH ROLLED EDGE SECTION PAD FOOTING SCALE 12 = 1' -0' 32-0 TO EXISTING TS COLUMNS OUTLINE OF DECORATIVE MASONRY R 5 GOLIMM WRAP BY OT}{H2 TS COLUMN SEE DETAIL 1/5-1 4'3 PREPARE SUBGRADE PER SOILS REPORT Li SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED FOR THE FOLLOYVING ITEMS I. ALL WEWIN6 2. ALL FOOTING EXCAVATIONS AND FOUNDATION BEARING SOILS FROR TO PLACE—ENT OF STRUCTURAL FILL PER SOILS REPORT. 3. ALL STRUCTURAL. FILL PLACEMENT PER 501L5 REPORT. 12-0• DISPENSER SUMP EDGE OF ISLAND; OUTSIDE LINE 15 ROLLED EDGE 22 GAUGE STEEL 'GRAN PRIX' PAN135 UNDER CEILING JOISTS BY ALIFIET BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. ADDL 4 4x42' TOP, AND BOT. AT ALL ISLAND OP13-71. TYP. (30'x16' AT TOP OF ISLAM) (2) 44x46• DIAGONAL TOP AND BOT. OF SUMP OPENING CONCRETE FILLED METAL FORMED GUARD AT ENDS OF ISLANDS (2) 11 4 TOP AND BOTTOM BUMPER END (4) 4 5x32'14' . DOWELS EEAA FACE OF y BUMPER nl 44x42' AT Ib•os. TOP AND BOT. 1 I -0 .: SCALE'. I2' = 1' -0• ! REINF. GONG. SLAB BY OTHERS FOR PIPE AND CONDUIT, — SEE T AND E DRAWN. SECTION SCALE , 12• = I' -0' 4'-b• (II) 45 SHORT BARS (9) *6 LONG BAR5 4' -6 1 I PLAN DETAIL OF DISPENSER ISLAND 32'— O "x4' —O" 5' -0•x8' -6'x24• THICK PAD FOOTING BELOW ISLAND. LOCATE A5 SHOWN IN DETAIL 6/5-1 14' -0' TO NEXT T5 COLUMN CE COLUMN AND PAD FOOTING TS COLUMN - 5 DTL I/S-I OUTLINE OF DECORATIVE MASONRY COLUMN WRAP BY OTHERS TOP OF PAD FOOTING ml� TS COLUMN SEE DETAIL 1/5-1 NOTE DETAIL 15 ROTATED 40' FROM ORIENTATION SHOWN IN CANOPY FRAMING. PLAN. (4) 44 LON6'L TOP AND WT. ck ISLAND SYMMEIRIGAL NON-COMBUSTIBLE WASTE RECEPTACLE BY GONTRAGTO^ic GONE BENT le 4 232x22 G.A. ACROSS TOP SHEET METAL FASCIA PANELS CONT. BENT le 4 23230_2 G.A. ACROSS TOP SHEET METAL ': FASCIA PANELS D2000-069 11 4 m I FASTEN DECK TO ANGLE H/ d \ (TOTAL OF (6)) - USE H101-1 '1 7E1,5 41 STITCH SCREE 5 o ' 6 In• ROLL FORM® GONTINIOUS FASCIA BY ALLMET F (4) ERECTION BOLTS (OPTIO 1 / rlf■ ''1 SECTION SCALE 3/4 = 1' -0• BEAM NO SCALE 2-6 FASTEN DECK TO ANGLE AT 6 MAX. - SEE DM. 7/5-1 FOR FASTENERS I ` 6 I!2• ROLL FORMED CONTINUOUS FASCIA BY ALLMET SECTION 56,E 3/4' = 1' -0' DETAIL SCALE 3/4' = I' -0• SECTION SCALE 3/4' = 1' -0• CEILING JOIST AIi \ =la (3) 1 /4- 14x7 /5' HWH TEKS KI STITCH SCREWS AT ALL LAPPED JOINTS MIN_ EDGE DISTANCE = 12 - FASCIA WIND BRACE 4 232x22 GA. AT 48'oc. L GRAN PRIX PANEL CEILING JOIST GRAN PRIX PANELS (3) 1/4- 14x7/6' 54/ TEKS 4i STITCH SCREWS AT ALL LAPPED JOINTS MIN. EDGE DISTANCE 12• FASCIA WIND BRACE 232x22 6A. AT 49 — I/4• WEB STIFFENER EA 51 DE OF WEB TYP. AT EA. INTERSECTION SEE DTL. 10/5 -1 FOR FLANGE BRACE (NOT SHOWN) (4) ERECTION BOLTS (OPTIONA) BEAM CEILING JOIST 1/4' WEB STIFFENER EA SIDE OF WEB TYP. AT EA BEAM/JOIST INTERSECTION GRAN PRIX PANELS SEE DTL. II/5 -I FOR ATTACHE -LENT OF ROOF PANELS 5/16 , — (4) 12 -24x1 I2' HWH TEKS 45 SGREw5 w/ COMPOSITE 050' z 5/5• OD. ALUMIN/M- NEOPRENE WASHER r BOTTOM FLANGE OF I CEILING JOIST —4 2x223/16 FLANGE BRACES TYP. AT EA BEAM / CEILING JOIST INTERSECTION TYP. (5) LOCATIONS 1/4 WEB STIFFENERS SEE 12, 8/5-1 r, DLETON, INC. I RRSRI A L 4 Nyjl clTVaF *�uKwn.. JAN 1 3 2000 PERMIT CENT. sheet S- GMA job no. 99229 O z Q D_ x W z z O Q0 H Z Q wQ J � J� O O O V VENT STACK PIPING SUMP RELOCATED VENT STACK u EXISTING UNDERGROUND TANKS • NEW 2' PRIMARY FIBERGLASS VENT LBW INSIDE r'FBERGLASS SECONDARY SLOPE BACK 70 TANKS TANK LOCATIONS AND PIPING PLAN SCALE: 1" = 10' 1 E )( e' rul D2DUYOD9 FASTENERS AS REQUIRED BY DISPENSER MFG. SCALE: NTS DISPENSER SUMP WALL 0 10 20 30 40 GRAPHIC SCALE NEW DISPENSER SEAL DETAIL DISPENSER FRAME SIUCONE SEALANT MIN. 1/4" BEAD CONT. ALL AROUND:. BETWEEN FLANGES TOP OF ISLAND STRUCTURAL REBAR SCALE: NTS SHEAR VALVE MOUNTING PLATE VAPOR UNE SHEAR VALVE DISPENSER FRAME T.O. ISLAND FORM 1' FLEX CONNECTOR M -NPT 2'XETNPT REDUCER BUSHING 2' FIBERGLASS VAPOR RETURN UNE INSIDE 3' FIBERGLASS SECONDARY CONTAINMENT 3" SUMP ENTRY BOOT TIP. OF (1) PER SUMP 3"X2' RUBBER TEST REDUCER DEEP DISPENSER SUMP EXISTING INLINE DISPENSER SUMP DETAIL SCALE: NTS SHEAR VALVE MOUNTING PLATE DISPENSER FRAME T.O. ISLAND FORM VAPOR UNE SHEAR VALVE 1' FLEX CONNECTOR M -NPT EXISTING A.O. SMITH 2' FIBERGLASS VAPOR RETURN UNE INSIDE 3' FIBERGLASS SECONDARY CONTAINMENT NOTES 3" SUMP ENTRY BOOT TIP. OF (1) PER SUMP EXISTING. DEEP DISPENSER SUMP O EXISTING ENVIRON 1 -1/2' GEOFLEX D PRODUCT SUPPLY UNE INSIDE 4" GEODUCT SECONDARY. SLOPE BACK TO TANKS. O2 EXISTING 2' PRIMARY FIBERGLASS VAPOR RETURN / VENT UNE INSIDE 3" FIBERGLASS SECONDARY. SLOPE DOWN TO TANKS 0 EXISTING 3' PRIMARY FIBERGLASS VAPOR RETURN / VENT UNE INSIDE 4' FIBERGLASS SECONDARY. SLOPE DOWN TO TANKS EXISTING DISPENSER DECAL O DISPENSER - TO BE NUMBERED AS INDICATED WITH 3" WHITE DECALS SUMP SIDE SECTION 2'X1' NTP REDUCER BUSHING 3"X2" RUBBER TEST REDUCER SUMP SIDE SECTION TERMINATING DISPENSER SUMP DETAIL DOUBLE POPPET SHEAR VALVE TIP. OF (2) PER SUMP DISPENSER FRAME EXPLOSION PROOF ELECTRICAL J -BOX SEE STRUCTURAL (5 -1) ELECTRICAL SEAL -OFF (TIP.) l� 3/4' & 1" SUMP ENTRY BOOTS TYP. OF (1) EACH PER SUMP ENVIRON 1 -W GEOFLEX 0 PRODUCT PIPING INSIDE 4' GEODUCT (4) ENTRIES PER SUMP 1 -34" SUMP ENTRY BOOT TYP. OF (4) PER SUMP DEEP DISPENSER SUMP DISPENSER FRAME EXPLOSION PROOF ELECTRICAL J -BOX ELECTRICAL SEAL -OFF (TYP.) SEE STRUCTURAL (S -1) 3/4" AND 1" SUMP ENTRY BOOTS TY?. OF (1) EACH PER SUMP SUMP SENSOR DEEP DISPENSER SUMP (TRIM NECK AS REQUIRED) SUMP END SECTION SUMP END VIEW APR 5 3003 gU:MOGU DINSIO N SHEAR VALVE MOUNTING BRACKET TYP. OF 2 PER SUMP DISPEN SEAL EE TOP OF SUMP SENSOR JUNCTION TEE FITTING TYP. OF (2) PER SUMP 1 h' TEST BOOT TYP. OF (4) PER SUMP 1 14' GEOFLEX COUPLING TYP. OF (4) PER SUMP 10' CONNECTOR TUBE TYP. OF (2) PER SUMP DOUBLE POPPET SHEAR VALVE TIP. OF (2) PER SUMP SHEAR VALVE MOUNTING PLATE & BAR TYP. (2) PER SUMP ink DISPENSER SEAL SEE FIRE EATER 40 TOP OF CONC. SLAB 1 34" GEOFLEX COUPUNG TYP. OF (2) PER SUMP ENVIRON 1 -34' GEOFtEX 34VR 1 3 2000 PRODUCT PIPING INSIDE 4" GEODUCT (2) ENTRIES PER SUMP 4" GEODUCT ENTRY BOOT TYP. OF (2) PER SUMP 36' TEST TUBE TYP. OF (2) PER SUMP a F - 2'x1 -1/2' SWIVEL ELBOW TIP. OF (2) PER SUMP 1 -14' TEST BOOT TYP. OF (2) PER SUMP CITV OF !H V D APPP CONC. SLAB MATERIAL LIST AT TANKS/VENT STACKS QTY DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER 3 3 2' WATER COLUMN VENT CAP 3`x30° Fl FTC ROOT OPW M ODEL N0. 523LP -2203 CONTAINMENT TF(`.HNOI OCJFS MOOFl N7. 350030 3 2x18 Fl FX CONNECTOR TELEFLEX MODEL N0. 60 -10477 -0180 6 1 GEOFLEX TEST TUBE - 36 LG. IN I INF PIPING CIIMP 3!1'X30' ENVIRON MODEL NO. GTT -3836 ENOIRON MODEL NO. 195 -3030 1 30" DIA ROUND MANHOLE. WATERTIGHT OPW MQOEL P.'O. 2110 -3GWT 1 6 3/4" RIGID CONDUIT. ELECTRICAL SEAL OFF ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOX 2" SVAVEL PIPE COUPLING KILLARK MODEL NO. GRSSA A OR EQUAL ENVIRON MODEL NO. SPC -0200 6 6 3" FLEXIBLE ENTRY BOOT 2" TEST BOOT ENVIRON MODEL NO. FEB -6300 EN`r1RON MODEL NO. SIB -3200 1 CONTAINMENT SUMP SENSOR. DISCRIMINATING VEEDER -ROOT MODEL NO. 794380 -352 BY G.C. 2 FIBERGLASS VENT UNE INSIDE r FIBERGLASS SECONDARY CONTAINMENT PIPE, FITTING t GLUE KITS A.O. SMITH RED THREAD 11 OR EQUAL 3 3" x 2" RUBBER REDUCER WEAVER MODEL NO. R 3x2 MATERIAL LIST AT DISPENSERS QTY DESCRIPTION, MANUFACTURER 2 BLENDER DISPENSER 3 +0 2 HOSE 1 W/VAPOR VAC. W /CARD READER OPTIONS CdLBARCO ADVANTAGE SEH)ES MODEL', NO. 878XXX 120 VAC 14 FlLLGAR8 SPLASH. GUARD FOR 11A & 118 NOZZLE (RED) OPW MODEL NO. 8R -0300 4 RED VAPOR. RECOVERY BELLOWLE5S ASSIST SYSTEM NOZZLE (UNL GILBARLO HASS) OPW MODEL NO. 11VA1 -0327 4 DOUBLE POPPET SHEAR VALVE, 1/13" M -NPT - TOP STYLE, BOSS MOUNTED OPW M ODEL N0. 108HMP- 58300 2 VAPOR UNE SHEAR VALVE 1'X1 -3N" F -NPT BOSS MOUNTED OPW MODEL N0. 60VSP -1001 4 14 FLEXSTEEL II VAPOR ASSIST FUEL HOSE GOOD AR MODEL NO GYP 3 4" - 14' VACUU ASS\ • .`A• EL HOS BREAKAWAY VALVE W /SNIVEL (VAPOR SEAL) • �.. • i .�. a 2 a •" •" (V.R. GILBARC0 DISPENSER) TELEFLEX MODEL NO. •0- 10345 -0180 2 REDUCER BUSHING FTTP.NG -2" BELL X 1" FEMALE NPT A.O. SMITH RED THREAD 11 OR EQUAL 4 4 GEODUCT ENTRY BOOT " ••a �• 4 STABILIZER BAR ENVIRON MODEL NO. SB0 -1381 6 SHEAR VALVE MOUNTING PLATE ENVIRON MODEL NO. SVP -3050 2 3 ". FLEXIBLE ENTRY BOOT 21,1:•, , 9a: -• ex 2 3 "X2" RUBBER TEST REDUCER WEAVER MODEL NO. R 3,2 4 GEOFLEX TEST TUBE 36' LG 1 -." TEST BOOT ENVIRON MODEL. NO. GTT -3836 �'•.. 1 - -• 4 1 -31' GEOFLEX SWIVEL. PIPE COUPUNG ENVIRON MODEL NO. SPC -0150 4 2 "X1 -," NPT GEOFLEX SWIVEL ELBOW FITTING a VlR•;. ..a ,Q. ._ - 015 _ .]1 09a :F'M /hi,I:MI14•INII- Ir:C•149,11!IIL/ LX_ • • -6• M•.• 3 N0. 79 :0 -208 MIN 3 4 FLEXIBLE ENTRY BOOT ' i �: .1: .•.• ENVIRON MODEL NO. FEB-3075 VIRON MODEL N.. a_ -31.0 BY G. C. 3/4" RIGID .CONDUIT, ELECTRICAL SEAL -OFF, • KILLARK MODEL NO. GRSSA A OR EQUAL BY G.C. 1' RIGID CONDUIT, ELECTRICAL SEAL -OFF, ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOX, EXPL090N PROOF KILLARK MODEL N0. GRSSA A OR EQUAL 6 FIRE EATER 80 ECO SAFE MODEL NO. ASFE - 80 8 FI - ' • a• 40 ECO SAFE MODEL NO. ASFE - 40 EXPLOSION PROOF JUNCTION BOX 3/4" RIGID CONDUIT 3/4" FLEX ENTRY BOOT PIPING SUMP VENT PIPING SUMP DETAIL NIS YOnto. S- VENT RISER 3 x 2• RUBBER REDUCER 3'x WY FLEX BOOT Y PRIMARY PPE Y BO ELBOW SECTION TOP OF GRADE 2 COUPLING Yx iB' FLEX MxM CONNECTOR Y BELL x FEMALE Y 90' ELBOW TO TANK -- fY CONTAINMENT PPE NOTE: GAS STATION CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY BAND CLAMPS ARE SECURELY FASTENED PRIOR TO INSPECTION SUMP SENSOR "HAI 30' ROUND MANHOLE 2" SWIVEL PIPE COUPUNG TYP. OF (6) 3" FLEXIBLE ENTRY BOOT TYP: OF (6) 2 FIBERGLASS' VENT UNE INSIDE 3" FIBERGLASS SECONDARY PIPE 2" TEST BOOT TYP. OF (6) 2" UNION 5CR'D 1504 GALV. STEEL TYP. OF (3) PLAN - 2 VENT CAP TYP. OF (3) GRADE ELEVATION NOTE: LOCATE VENT STACK WORK CLEAR OF EXISTING TREES VENT STACK DETAIL NIS 2 "0 GALV. SCH. 40 VENT PIPE PAINT DARK 5053 TYP. OF (3) GALV. UNI -STRUT SUPPORT BRACKET PAINT DARK GREY 2" UNION SCR'0 1504 GALV. STEET TYP. OF (3) 2" SWIVEL PIPE COUPUNG TYP. OF (6) 2" TEST BOOT TYP. OF (6) 6' - x 4'0 GALV. STEEL POST PAINT DARK GREY TYP. OF (2) 2" GALVANIZED STEEL COUPUNG TYP. OF (3) 2" FIBERGLASS VENT UNE INSIDE 3" FIBERGLASS SECONDARY PIPE SLOPE 0001 TO TANK AT MINIMUM 1/4 PER FOOT 12 "• x 3' CONCRETE POST 60011140 TYP OF (2) RUNE PIPING SUMP TESTING TUBE TYP. OF (6) 3" FLEXIBLE. ENTRY BOOT TYP. OF (6) SUMP SENSOR -N-- --3/4" FT.E< ENTRY BOOT 3/4" RIGID CONDUIT 2" FIBERGLASS VENT UNE INSIDE 3" SECONDARY PIPE D)-060- 00 Ey'red \VISION Tc W 2 T -2 EXISTING PRICE COSTCO OPTICAL LAB 33,100 S.F. NOTES: EXISTING AREA LIGHT TO REMAIN I F 0 ALL INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER N.EC., ARTICLE 514 ® ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE U.L APPROVED 0 INTERCEPT EXISTING WIRING TO AREA LIGHTS. PROVIDE TRAFFIC RATED WATER TIGHT BOXES. RUN CONDUITS TO NEW LOCATIONS. MAINTAIN PRESENT CIRCUITING AND CONTROL. EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS & INSTALLATION NOTES (4) DOSING HUBBELL FS-16 S1GNUGHTER SERIES CANOPY FASCIAUGHT 120V WEATHERPROOF UNITS APPROVED FOR WET LOCATION VA. CONDUIT ADAPTERS, POSITION HORIZONTALLY FROM TOP OF FASCIA. USE FB-22 REMOTE CANISTER BALLAST FOR FS-16. USE F96T12/CW/VHO LAMPS. ADJUST FOR UNIFORM UGHT DISTRIBUTION ON FASCIA. (4) NEW LSI INDUSTRIES SCOTTSDALE SERIES CANOPY DOM UGHT, MODEL NO. SC-S-320-PG-MT-WHT-NO 320 WATTS AS APPROVED FOR WET LOCATIONS, CUT 4 HOLES IN CENTER UNE OF NECKING PIECE. (REF. DRAWING SHT. A-3) (2) EXISTING PELCO WLV2000 SERIES WRELESS VIDEO TRANSMITTER 11-16 VDC (2) EXISTING SANYO VCB-3524 1/2 INCH B/W VIDEO MONITORING CAMERA 24VAC (1) EXISTING INTERCOM PHONE, VIKING 61000-7 CONC. wm, EXISTING AREA LIGHT TO BE REMOVED 10' RADIUS 18" ABOVE GRADE CLASS 1, DIV. 2 VENT sum HAZARDOUS AREA TO BE RELOCATED a l. I 1 Dame AREA LIGHTS TO RE" MING AREA LIGHT TO MAIN EXISTING CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE EXISTING AREA LIGHT TO REMAIN EXISTING AREA LIGHT TO REMAIN 5' SPHERICAL RADIUS GRADE CLASS 1, DIV. 2 HAZARDOUS AREA f\ AREA LIGHTING, SOURCE ELECTRICAL AND COMMUNICATIONS SCALE: 1' = 30' EXISTNG UNDERGROUND TANKS GRAPHIC SCALE NEW AREA USW AREA LIGHT RELOCATED AREA LIGHT 10 REMAIN RELOCATED EXISTING A EA iGHT AREA LIGHT TO BE RELOCATED 0 30 60 90 120 GRAPHIC SCALE DOb - DOI? ctQl( CANOPY LIGHTING AND MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL SCALE: 1' = 10' 0 10 20 30 40 EXISTING AREA LIGHT TO REMAN A T AREA E, rI N T EXISPNG NEW ISLAND EXiSTING (1) 1 C FOR FUTURE VAPOR RECOVERY SYSTEM SlUBOUT RODE CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE. DAMON PROOF SEAL OFF. AND CAP OFF LEGEND - - - EXISTING UNDERGROUND CONDUIT. EXISTING EXPOSED CONDUIT - - - NEW UNDERGROUND CONDUIT NEW EXPOSED CONDUIT EXISTING DISPENSER ISLAND DISPENSER - TO BE NUMBERED AS INDICATED WITH 3 wHnE EC ' ROUTINGS SHOWN ARE SCHEMATIC, FINAL LOCATIONS SHALL BE SHOWN ON AS—BUILT DRAWINGS EXISTING TAMER arl EXPLOSION PROOF SEAL (EPS) AT ALL CONDUITS WITHIN 18" OF THE alCLOSURE AND AT THE BOUNDARY OF A HAZARDOUS AREA, CLASS 1, DIVISION 1, GROUP - 1r HAZARDOUS AREA, (FUEL TANKS AND DISPENSER AREAS) ALL CONDUITS ENTERING OR LEAVING A HAZARDOUS AREA SHALL BE GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL CLASS I HAZARDOUS AREA (PER NEC) n.. • , 4 (2) :tfiLDOIE 82512COAX?9, / \ / VIDEO ONLY N -- - -- -\ K_ --- - --- / - " i ‘bi i , , ; '..1 6Z 1 3". C FOR VENT STACK SUMP 1 BELDON CABLE 1 /12 TRW GRND 11 11 EXISTING 11111 EMERGENCY SHUT-OFF SWITCH EXISTING CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE EXISTING (3) UNDERGROUND TANKS rE FAS:RIA LICF:HT TOBE R TER TYP. OF -kb EXISTING CONDUITS c,°, •L;:, ; - C y „ • L _ _ r r ▪ Z ‘c.5 ?4 NEk CANCeY DOMINO TYP. ()Fp) c ,,"1 /Z-Tgrx;V I - - NT E YraaG,irriR EXISTI EM__GEN _ ,SHUT,OFF u9 r c c r1 ;: i 1F A BO ‘n9 ` C \ANI' R ST:R. L ti ■ EXISal -1 j A ' T, Pl t A r c , D I 13 r D „C z E-1 MAR 2 i 2000 PANEL" A" 120/208 VOLTS 3 4 WIRE OR NO BREAKER LTS. LTS. flEC. MISC. REMARKS 1.-1 VOLT 1,2 -AMPS L3 LCL AMP POLE 1 20 1 1 1 RECEPTACLE 960 180 ✓ 2 - - SPACE 3 20 1 1 RECEPTACLE 180 ✓ 4 20 1 i A/C UNIT 1200 ✓ 5 20 1 1 PHONE MODEM 180 ■ 6 20 1 2 LIGHTING 80 7 - - 1 SPACE 960 8 - 1 SPACE 960 9 - - SPACE 10 - - SPACE 1 - - SPACE - - 12 - - SPACE 20 1 13 - - SPACE - 1 4 - - SPACE - - 15 20 1'' 1 AUTOGAS - 360 ✓. 16 - -. SPACE - - '.. ''. 17 20 1 '.. 1 2 CHANNEL LIGHTING TIMER - - 50 18 - -.. SPACE 20 1 9 15. 3.. 1 2 HP TURBINE TANK 1 1080 1 20 DISPENSER 19413 13 t 14 900 1 2 HP TURBINE TANK 2 1080 - 21 NEUTRAL W/ CKT 19 NEUTRAL W/ CKT 20 - W/ CKT 19 - 080 22 23 - - Y7 CKT 20 SPACE 1080 - 23 24 - - W/ CKT 19 SPACE 1080 - 24 25 20 1 W /'CKT 20 D1SPOISER 11N13 15 & 15 950 1080 25 26 - - i 2 HP TURBINE TANK 1080 26 - - - SPACE NEUTRAL W/ CKT 25 27 15 3 - 1 4 W / 'CKT 25 SPACE SPACE FASCIA LIGHTING 1080 - 800 28 - - 1 4 29 15 3 800' W/ C1(1 100A W/ LUGS ONLY SUB TOTAL 7680 080 1600 30 - - TOTAL SURFACE 9280 MOUNTED TOTAL SPACE 400 9280 9680 1 1 LOCATION INTERIOR WALL 31 - - SPACE 32 - - SPACE 33 - - SPACE 34 - - SPACE 35 - - SPACE - 36 20 i CAMERA CONTROLLER CIRCUIT .100 ✓ 37 20 i 4EEDER -ROOT CONTROL PANEL 600 ✓ 38 20 1 GILBARCO DISTRIBUTION BOX 360 ✓ 39 20 4 CANOPY LIGHTING 1800 ✓ 40 20 4 CANOPY LIGHTING 1800 ✓ 41 20 4 CANOPY LIGHTING 1800 ✓ 42 20 1 4 CANOPY WHIM 1000 ✓ MAIN 225A LUGS W/ LUG KIT SUBTOTAL 4200 5050 7250 103130 55.6 ors, Gunn - ea: i e-u TOTAL 20030 67 8 AMPS. W/LCL SURFACE MOUNTED 25% TOTAL 2590 20030 222620 WA LL 'CAT*" INTERI BREAKER RATING 10,000 AIC LLER ENCLOSURE P ANEL " Al" 120/208 VOLTS 3 W 4 WIRE CIA. NO. BREAKER LTS. REC. MISC. REMARKS VOLT -AMPS AMP POLE L -1 L-2 L3 LCL 1 20 1 1 DISPENSER UNITS 1 &2 960 2 - - SPACE 3 - - NEUTRAL W/ CKT 1 4 - - SPACE 5 - - SPACE 6 - - SPACE 7 20 1 1 DISPENSER UNITS 3& 4 960 8 20 1 DISPENSER UNITS 5 & 6 960 9 - - NEUTRAL W/ CKT 7 10 - - NEUTRAL W/ CKT 8 SPACE - 11 - - i2 - - SPACE 13 20 1 1 DISPENSER UNITS 7 & 8 960 20 1 1 DISPENSER UNITS 9 & 10 960 11 - - NEUTRAL W/ CKT 13 16 - - NEUTRAL W/ CKT 14 17 - - SPACE 18 - - SPACE 19 20 1 1 DISPENSER UNITS 11 & 12 960 20 20 1 1 DISPENSER 19413 13 t 14 900 21 - - NEUTRAL W/ CKT 19 NEUTRAL W/ CKT 20 - 22 - - 23 - - SPACE - 24 - - SPACE - 25 20 1 1 D1SPOISER 11N13 15 & 15 950 26 - - SPACE 27 - - NEUTRAL W/ CKT 25 28 29 - 20 - 1 4 SPACE FASCIA LIGHTING - 800 ✓ 30 20 1 4 FASCIA LIGHTING 800' MAIN 100A W/ LUGS ONLY SUB TOTAL 7680 0 1600 1600 758 AMPS. CONNECTED AMPS. W/LCL RATING 10,000 AIC TOTAL SURFACE 9280 MOUNTED TOTAL 25% 400 9280 9680 1 1 BREAKER LOCATION INTERIOR WALL CONTROLLER ENCLOSURE D •pired * NOTE: 0051940 =RCUITS TO BE CONNECTED FOR ADOIDONAL CANOPY LIOH1010 MD DISPENSER POWER A A A A A A A A A A A A B PANEL SCHEDULE PANEL SCHEDULE -4- ISLAND CONNECTED LOAD - FUEL STATION = 31.97 KVA MAR 3 2000 UO C EIRE- J'.iti 4 1 Z E -2 a AR 211 2000 ;a:ra