HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2008-09-08 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET w�► ��w Tukwila City Council Agenda
0 aaa COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
JF 1 a
133 k Jim Ha erton Ma or Councilmembers• J oan Hernandez Pamela Linder
Y J
*0 Rhonda Berry, City Administrator Dennis Robertson a Verna Griffin
1908
Joe Duffie, Council President a Kathy Hougardy a De'Sean Quinn
MONDAY, September 8, 2008, 7.•00 PM Tukwila City Hall; Council Chambers
1. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CITIZEN At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included on this agenda
COMMENT (please limit your comments to five minutes per citizen). To comment on
an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is presented
for discussion.
3. SPECIAL a. Tukwila Village Developer Proposals continued discussion. Pg.1
ISSUES Please bring the two proposals from the developers, distributed in July and
your Council packets from the 8/18/08 Regular and 8/25/08 CO. W.
b. Seismic Evaluation Results. Pg.13
Please bring your copy of the Seismic Report, distributed previously. Q
4. REPORTS a. Mayor c. Staff e. Intergovernmental
b. City Council d. City Attorney
5. MISCELLANEOUS
6. EXECUTIVE SESSION
7. ADJOURNMENT
Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible.
Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance
notice to the City Clerk's Office 206 433- 1800/TDD 206 -248 -2933.
This notice is available at www.ci.tukwila.wa.us. and in
alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities.
Tukwila Council meetings are audio taped.
1 LA ‘,,4-14:i.14‘,
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials
ITEmNo.
Q i P1 1 Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor's review (1 �enuncil review 1
�'j I I
t -1 3
08/18/98 I DCS P�
i 08/25/08 DCS 1 10CS
0 DCS I O( J
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 08-109 I ORIGINAL. AGENDA DATIi: AUGUST 18, 2008
AGENDA I ENITrnm: Tukwila Village: Discussion of developer proposals
C. \"I'E.GO N Discussion U _Motion n Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
liig Date 09/08/08 lft,g Date lltg Date ill! Date R& Date i1itg Date Kitg Date
1 SPONSOR n Council Mayor Arlin Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal n P &R Police PIY/
SPONSOR'S Two developers have submitted proposals to develop Tukwila Village. At the August 18
SUMMARY Council meeting, the developers presented information regarding their proposals.
At this meeting Council will discuss the proposals. No action is required.
RI WI PAVED BY COW Mtg. [1 CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte n Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte its Comm. n Parks Comm. 1 1 Planning Comm.
DATE:
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ ADMIN. Discussion
CO \IIMITfEE
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
ExP1 iND ITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$0 $0 $0
Fund Source:
Comments:
1 MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
08/18/08 Developer proposals were presented to the Council
08/25/08 Discussion and questions and answers; forward to 9/8/08 Council Meeting
MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS
08/18/08 Informational memo providing a basic statistical comparison of the proposals dated 8/12/08
Informational memo comparing statistics for proposed housing dated 8/14/08
Informational memo comparing developer experience dated 8/14/08
08/25/08 Informational memo evaluating the proposals to the City's criteria dated 8/21/08
09/08/08 Informational memo providing a revised evaluation of the proposals dated 9/5/08
....(Please bring the 2 proposals from the developers distributed in July)
(And your Council packets from 8/18/08 and 8/25/08)
q s'' City of Tukwila }y f Jim Haggerton, Mayor
Q 'J zap- t�
113.,; O Office of the Mayor
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
,'1,4 Tukwila, WA 98188
1908 www.ci.tukwila.wa.us
Date: September 5, 2008
To: City Council
Copy: Mayor
City Administrator
Legislative Analyst
From: Economic Developmen As .11 stra r
Re: Tukwila Village Proposals: Significant Differences
In order to help the Council compare the Tukwila Village development proposals, staff has
created a comparison of the significant differences (see below). Also, we have attached an
update of the worksheet that compares the two developer proposals to the evaluation criteria.
We are waiting for an outside consultant's report comparing the two proposals. The consultant's
report will attempt to identify any significant differences between the proposals that we have not
yet recognized. It will also attempt to quantify (within an order of magnitude) if the proposals are
economically feasible.
This worksheet and memo are based on preliminary discussions with the consultant. The final
report should be available by September 12.
One of the most important points to consider is that both of these developers are highly qualified
and very capable of developing Tukwila Village. Either of these developers would be a good
choice. There is no easy choice because both proposals have strengths and will be a benefit to
the community. Of course, their approaches are different and come with different trade -offs.
Please contact me at 206 433 -1832 or dspeck @ci.tukwila.wa.us if you have any questions.
Tukwila Village Developer Proposals
Comparison of Significant Differences
Legacy Tarragon
Advantaaes Advantaaes
1. More feasible 1. More retail space
Less risk of market demand Offers more welcoming atmosphere
Fewer unknowns Better ability to "grow" with Tukwila
80% of development in phase 1 (retail types can flex and upgrade
2. Indoor commons area for formal and over time)
informal gathering Additional retail offers approx.
3. Entire project offers $1 to $3 million $100,000 in sales tax to City
higher payment to City annually
4. 50 senior apartments (low income) 2. Many citizens prefer the extra retail,
5. 25 for -sale townhouses (moderate larger plaza, and aesthetic appearance
income, first -time homebuyers) 3. 60 apartments set -aside for moderate
income tenants
Challenaes Challenaes
1. Architecture, plaza, and landscaping 1. Locating a 15,000 square foot drug
need to be "warmer" and more store at the corner of TIB and 144
welcoming. separates the plaza from the rest of
2. Would need to structure a the community and is challenging to
partnership between property owner make attractive along TIB.
and City to manage indoor commons.
Risks Risks
1. May be challenging to find apartment 1. May not be financially feasible to build
tenants willing to pay $1.45 to $1.80 project for projected rents of $1.35
per square foot per month rent. per square foot.
2. Proposed density of residential on
phase 2 may not be palatable to City.
3. A large portion of commercial space
may be services instead of retail.
Version dated 9/5/08
cn
ca C cn
to
Q) Q) a) 4- cc a)
O •0 LO v) 2 .(1) O O O a)
U�, c+p- LL =j O N v 4-- C C O N Q7 to
O i U O Q) O
o x 3 o
4-• Y a
a) C L
CU (r) ca ca a) p a O o
c :3 c
cti Cr)
c o L c
p t3 '<n O O xc a)O o Q c c w •c aJ n
0
U ca ca ca Q) v) (a
Q�J ca b p p ca N L as LT) Q b
C x F— ca c t] Fa
Q. as O 0 i (a pOj CAR p O f a X C
c ca cI—'3 p o O 13 W 'ti 3 4._ v
o X 0
ai 1 Cr) C) ca o V Quo >4. L
ca I 1 C O U ca O a= (a a) 0
c L Q i Q a) 4= L O C a) O C
Q L ra N 0 a, C Q Q M O N L Cn (a O O C L a) a) a) E -o C ,i-• S U [o
r Q CT) 1 -C 7- UO C 4 a'
vi ca t!) v cn O 1- ca
U 0) U C
1- C N 0 C C
0 (a CS p 0 as L Ql Q) Y C C O
V) C a) C f N O ca Q E co p O O p
CO c i Q x oQ a' o a co
L a 1_ T" 't O O L J Q1 U O i Q) d M Q ca C
i 0
O CO OC a) O
w
't' o o U c s a �a c U E cn c3 L
Q v o W o a s ci E ca c a) a) o
Q H M
0 O cm o Cn co "5 X a) aJ ra N a)
Q L v) a) c L Cn a a) �O ca Q)
O O c0 Q C Q) U co -1,-
cn L O C O
1 N Q v) C to L C O r= O s 6) c c a) v) a) O
0 a.) Q} ra a te 7 -0 U l7 c 1-J U 1p -C O V ca c in O k' Q
CU -0 L v) :c` in C N a) 0 U v p a) rO-
Q) _a o m CO a c o a)a) 0 roo
V Q E a i ca °Q �o� n
u
0
0 o
C
Y QJ
O .L ro
L
O.
Qi.� o r:
cm C V v
n
L a) a) .ro C
MI 0 O a 4 J c a g
t X
CU L a) V.
E p C o
■sm C O Q OD
r.J
2 i___, 3 O o 0
fa (1)
z co O
C
FEN 7
O.
a_`O,
o o
c co
a) o 1._ c E o 0
n -t7 u- N 4--' 4--- C '(n C O
o V a) C C v) O f� cn i -0
v 0 a o a,
c C {6 L a 0 1.. 0 a) U n v O co
0 o a a)
CD. s N3 �c� 1-.3 0
a
sfs _c a) 0 _0 C 0 v a C O
a 0
a3 co
O V) 0 E-0 N ¢Q) U 0 O 0 Oz c
L 4.:, C O u-- -a a) L 0. a) O a `1' 0;3 c' N c0
6 a) o o c o 0 n c= E a s E o Q
4- (I) O O C O a) _c 0 0 E 0 n 0 a) 0 p
C C i� Q1 F' 0 0 C 0 n v O a a. a O -N c0
0 r) N Q 0 'a) 0 o t_ L 0_C (0 S] a
N E O a)
Mr- 1 `i a) a. 0 0 0 ca
cv Q Q) L c j ca C cis ,n -fl O H
O
Q U C
1.-- -o 3 t-
(a C a-
0 (As_ C 0 Cn C =3 01 al
0 a) (0 (0 C i 0 O C _0
o a c0 v
U a. O �4-- i a) C "[7 E C U O
4- o O .N .0) cn fl a) c6 L
o c v, a) `n o 4 a
c tea+' -0 -m o Fd
c0 Cll a Q C C O U
to
E },co (0� m Ic n
-0 0 C (3.) 71- 4-' a) c� a c a) 4 1 ca
ro co
a a L- a) a Q) c (f) N
c�
a v fL O+ 1-- .0 0 O O C
i. a) 0) 0) E 0 -0 0 o 0 0) c
v C C O 0 0 0 O 0 -0 0 0 0_ v O 0 •r "C c0
CO O a) Q 0 (0 Q N 0 E a C i c L 0 c a .4 U O V O N
a). (0 cr) c o E °moo
cn a) �a���+� a)ca
O
c a) a�
o C
•N c e 4-
r
o E o
a 0 a; a)
2. o N ro
0 0 o
a C V e 4) o S
0u o c (0 c
i n Q v U U O
o
O a. C as (n
O Vl C 0 to LE cn o co
C 0 QJ 0 CO _c (0 Q co C n
(0 O 0 0 s_ MS 0 am
0- Q C U 0 r. w
C co 0 -o 0 C
r.
0- a_ �Q
CO CO
Ce a. v c.
Cr)
c
nu c c c c 7r-) o c T, (n
r c J a) c v) o o v 'o a Z' n3 �a
i+ c v 0> a v L Q C
v
ra Lr) L E 5- c o �m C L o m 4-• o
LO
L ct3 t= -a v c v a cv v c
Ts v
-C no !O a) j rII �a a) n3 L 1 cu.
O L
t E cr.'a w ago a L" a v c E o
4_ u) c 0 0 Q CO a) cn E E Y sn a 0 o -Q
L 'O a) 0 0 CU 9-- 3 c v_c .c o v ru v ra c v to its o
c Ql U C c 0 CA c c a J a 71- E Q v N c
E v 'E c o v o Q U c E m a a, v L cu
L s 0) v rp Vii arts N [O tr v E t Q a)
W v d 0 m -o 0.) E L m v fa -N
4-, r6 4- f If v° O 0 nu c Q
I— c
a)
to v N c v a)
L (n U v Z L
rp 3 1 ca C 4 O
3
co (n c 03 S� E-) c 4_ y. v cn v O
c o a) 43 v) ti c o a) p LC
C C L O Q) cn
w
a (Q a O c U o co
c c co L r i 0 a�i rzr
m v o c a) V a) a' c D c o
v o 'U c—iw •v, cn o c o f v o v 073
c L c a •L a E o g
c c v cc o p ca. co E c -E 03 L o
v c 0 c o c" a) 1_. c c c r n a o
v L .E-, O i v L O O v O ct3
o c c o E 3 o ro E u o E cp
c o a r o �o (n
O g 4_ c�ii 2 R `n o 2 its
U c U L a O c N -Q Q a r0 co
Un.rr (1.)
6
v
c
C o
w_c
o
m c a n O
L v)
a) c c
cii O
[p -I-,
CO U 'C O X
(1) a) v Q
Oc Q (T3
ro
U) U co U c Ms a o
o
rs,
in
0)
Gm
M a g i
(j o c
a, y
a.
rn�
a�
a) a) .7... a)
1 a) -E .Q
a) Q. N co a) N O
a) e a) t6 a) co o -d T
y O L V t, -N CS N a) N
co O -0 -C N O O vy co 6 O 13
Q N -0 01 C a) -0 o a) 0 O
4
s ue Of CO a) C) O a) 'El.. 9 c 1
0 0-co N N O C 0 0 O v co E
Fp co q) N O i? c E" O
N N 7 4--3 o T 0 co 'n -o v O U I� C
-0 a o c 4' N a) m� e- L 'Es..
7T G as y- O O O 'r-- 0 co N o.. cn
CO O O Q p u 0 a -0 t w o -0 c
a) a E 7 j a) Vf a) C J 2. O 0 5 T V Q�7 a1 -0 O a
a)
a) O c:U 6� Q co T o o o,
Q- A
G N O 'V N o
O Q 4) O 0 7� a)
t Q N C 2
0 a) 0
ctf Q -0 in
7 'cr.! 't. O
0 a) a) c o a)
C u) O _o 3
v Cr O co O co 0 -0 --(C) N O a) c4 O m u- a)
O C O f 0- 0 N O 0 fl Us oz)
>G O to O O T 0 co us O
a) a)
v N i 1 a) T •L N .s--, x O N N U O-
1 o v N Ti` U 0 7 -0
T C v cc) .N 4-'
1 N 0 d J co
co
1 1 L
N
o V 1
-c-' o ca
e v_ o
0 2 Fa r—
o 15 E o
o a) O
0 1 E 4--.) c- 0 Q fl
a Sa
o o
0 0
ca
c 1�
1
c o a)
-o Q C- E c °5 ca D a) N o c 4 1
a) 2 c c a a a c a) a ca a� a a) LL o p° 4-,
p E t 0) 0 O O C L O c- p o 0
1 L O L o -c 03 U C3) O C 4 Q t- i (a Q) co C U O L C ('J O O L 4 o Q)
1_ (1) co O ca (O -0 Cr) .x L O C O O O U O C O (n Q
C (a v O a O 0 0 (a 4J ..0 -0 Ln m 2 Q
o *V 4 0 to L -0 i a a- N (O
(n r C
U .i C7 O- O 1-- [a co c- C '4-- C> I- -O a) O O O E l a Z C E N Q Q) 6.-0 L O a c 0 O 0 C O a (a 1(
O X O (a a)_c v C O O (a U O• 4) N p
E. _p E y 2 C a) cr, CO C L O
C a C C O (O 'L -0 C L N n
O O U C L O' O U C Q) O C
A ca 0 O
Y C 4J E(
r. a O a c c L Q= c v) X c cn p Q u- i
(a a L L 0) 5 O 1 O o 0- (a o a) o a) a) o c a) a> zi_ 0 0 a-) o o o Q 0 (a o-0 v O V) CI� -0N� 1- H co
L
ON -C t0 O O E
L 4---. 0
O O E L Q)
O QJ O O Q N d) Q
R3 kr> O y_ 01 a L) Q O QO X O-
w ca CD N p 2 (a N or a) r-4 ate- (a O a te
L Ca 4- a� (=a L (a C
0 C N> O c O O d) c n
p C C (1 73 C 0) (a c ,O cn
r 4 Q- 4-, u) -o Y -C O' o L
Q 4.' V) c o c E C c c c c c
1-- C E (a .(1) 2 (a 03 (n ca O c
(a o o o (a 3 1 (1) L_ Ill a•
(a v) U
Q C O ca C c C o 4i LO P_-
(n O4 o C co 4-' m 0 _C'LL 0)' >QQQQ
,-1 O C O 3 (O O O 0) U aj U a
a) o)
Q) Ti CO Ti n-.) t--1 0 4) a) N ,-1 O C _C fl)
J �fl -o 1 Q) -EA- -c -69- 'O J
>--0 C (n
4-' Q)
Y
1 L
c
4-, E c,.
Q v
C
C O u up 2 a3
O (O .0
u Q) O U
c a) a-, a) U
O cn Q. v-
C 0. 00 CO
D 0 o
N
LO
ni
',..--3, .Y
w
O C
C
Ln D_
CO m v1
CL CO
1
0 m ti
I�u
0 i 9 f 3
t� (n 4—' s N O
i
i- 0- 0- O s. ca Q a> a) 0- N d U O 'i. -c3 0 a
1 u a) O C o O c j j cts
I co L
0 c a ,.o
G c a ai et.) a c�a a2. v
O fl 'C N N G C CO N N qtr 09
N p v t0 cCS i I o N o
ca U Li" O O c� O O O C fl 1 3
O 1
N V N COy f1 O� 0 0 1
7 �3 c 0) d 03 9 U fl
1 C p-c3 "E. 0 .N co So O
Q) d V 4 Q, co O O t— I O
a) 0 d 7 I 1 -0 C to
a Z U N
q) t ?ca. ca
as
`y o II as
I.: 4— O -0 3 1
0- 1 1 U
4 T� ca
X 0
co CJ j o a
cr) To
N p r} o y d s
CO N (0 N I
IQ v t I o L o E�? O
t6 ,.n N 0
f1 C O N O
y ar a) 4? Q} T N ca LS
p1 0 d c J 03,. --1(
ccs a ',5_
cn d
7 p 0
1r) 0
L
r
1 0 1 a N I Q o V o
Q i C C
0
0� 0 d O I�
0 Q
N its 0) c6 C
co E
E N 4 a? 0 0 J 0 7
I Q o r 9 3 co u co
I \P-0-
u- O
d'
r
1
0.
C cn
L
a) a) E 4-
C o C 0
f o x E> L
no 3+�+ X a) Q0 w
0 O V N
1 L
1 L E Q C ro L o
D a) X a) Q C O •(j 4_,
E Q O (II rB Q C a te 1
O Q O40, co 4-, C 0) Q
V) Q Q (_J rB a-.1 O r±- c a)
C C (o a) L C L N -c
CD O i 0) 4- C a) O
0.).) 0 U a) rE3 0 p y o N C
-E O (o C a'ra no
a) 13) U N Q C 0 E
L x C ,-i 0 a) O ro 0 a�I
m X— 2 O 0)U0 Q L C +3- -ac _C a (c, oO O E E H a) L C
c O v V C E (o c) (n _c E a 2 o
C13 roa) e n 0 vo 0Q� Cl
CO L Q>,C 1-00 rod O (o L a)
L O a) L 01 O co a---, Q) _c +-1
F Q 0 4- F d a l -Eft U 0 0 O
c
O 0 (n
ra L a) E 4- C
Q CO (U (n
0_ 4_ C O (o 4- a„_,
(3) .0 Q X a) C
O O= O Cr) O 0
a-, E O Q) L J _el E (L) v wa
2 Q) M C 0 LL
4- 0 a) a)
1 E O O 0 (n
C U a) E 2 _O s (f))
0y Q) no no O X a) 4 -0 a
C E J L
Q) Q)
L (n a-, (n (J L
a) Q) Q O O 0 Q) co co a 0
p (0 0" 0 a n
vi L) �O D O Q 0 o z
O a) p-
dj p 0...c 0 a) O Q a Q)
C
0 0 0 E W i Q (o o a)
(II 0
C ((1) (C) Q) a) O (o C A w-.
O c0 0) X U 0) co no (n O
0 Q a) (13 Jt co 0
CL X
'0
2 C
a)
n.
CL
V Q
(o O C
E 0 0
cm Q c
(o �C Q) (a
(n L 4--
Li i C
o L O
(C) (6 a)
C (n
U L C
L
Q) a) C O
C o
a N
v0 QC) 0
U Qom) 4 a
QJ
L o c
ate, N n
Z 5 a
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
[t i y Initials ITEM No.
g Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor's review l Council review
1 09/08/08 1 3M MC
1 1 I1 iv
rsoa b
ITEM INFORMATION
I CAS NUMBER: 08-110 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 2008
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Seismic Evaluation Results Presentation
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance ❑Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date 09/08/08 Mtg Date Mtg Date i11tg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date ivitg Date:
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PW
SPONSOR'S Reid Middleton was contracted to provide Seismic Evaluations for eleven City buildings;
SUMMARY City Hall, 6300 Bldg, 4 Fire Stations, Tukwila Community Center, George Long, and Minkler
Shops (three buildings). All of the buildings, with the exception of Fire Station 53 (built in
1995) do not meet the Immediate Occupancy Objective. Concept -level seismic upgrade
designs will be presented along with cost estimates.
REVthWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DA'Z'E: 09/03/08
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMI\N. Information only at this time.
COMfIrTEE Unanimous approval; forward to COW for discussion.
COST IMPACT 1 FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Fund Source:
Comments:
1 MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
I 09/08/08 1
MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS
09/08/08 1 Information Memo dated September 3, 2008 (revised after 9/3/08 F&S meeting)
I 1 Power Point Presentation
Finance Safety Committee Meeting Minutes from September 3, 2008
(Please bring your copy of the Seismic Report distributed previously)
1 1 COPIES OF THE PRESENTATION SLIDES TO BE PROVIDED SEPARATELY
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor Haggerton
From: Public Works Director
Date: September 3, 2008
Subject: Seismic Hazards Screening Report
PLEASE BRING YOUR COPY OF THE EVALUATION REPORT
ISSUE:
Review the results of the Seismic Hazards Screening Evaluation.
DISCUSSION:
After a preliminary evaluation, Reid Middleton was contracted to provide Seismic
Hazard Screening and Reporting services, using FEMA 154 and ASCE 31 -03 screening
criteria for nine City buildings (Minkler Maintenance Shops were divided into three
separate buildings). Reid Middleton's effort evaluated the building's structural
performance for the Immediate Occupancy objective. The Immediate Occupancy
performance objective was chosen because each of the buildings being evaluated provide
a critical function or service that will be needed by the community either during a disaster
or the long recovery period immediately following the disaster.
All of the buildings, with the exception of Fire Station 53, were found to have serious
seismic deficiencies, do not meet the Immediate Occupancy Objective, and more than
likely would not be able to provide the service or function required. Concept -level
seismic upgrade designs have been completed and are included in the report. These
designs describe the options to mitigate structural deficiencies. Cost estimates for the
concept -level upgrades have also been developed.
RECOMMENDATION:
Present to the Committee of the Whole for consideration.
PLEASE BRING YOUR COPY OF THE EVALUATION REPORT
City of Tukwila
a: ce'
a Finance Safety Committee
isoa
FINANCE AND SAFETY COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes September 3, 2008 5:00 p. nz.
PRESENT
Councilmembers: Dennis Robertson, Chair; Pam Linder and Kathy Hougardy
Staff: Jim Morrow, Bob Noland, Chris Flores, David Haynes, Chris Flores, Rhonda Berry,
Christy O'Flaherty and Kimberly Matej
Guests: Corbin Hammer, Project Engineer and Dave Swanson, Principal with Reid Middleton, Inc.
CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Robertson called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS No presentations.
II. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Seismic Evaluation Results Presentation
Committee Chair Robertson stated that due to the size and complexity of the Seismic Hazards Screening
Report, he would like to have the Committee focus on the basic report and its content. After that
information has been presented, the Committee can move forward to a discussion of recommendations of
from the consultant as well as staff.
Representatives from Reid Middleton, Inc. gave a PowerPoint presentation to discuss the seismic
evaluation results with the Committee. Dave Swanson discussed the extreme uncertainty of earthquake
engineering, but stated that the seismic study results are fairly certain. The overall intent of the report will
explain the current condition of the assessed facilities today. The presentation will lay the groundwork for
actual seismic report.
The presentation included an overview of the following:
e Facilities and Importance
o Considered facilities that provide critical services or functions to the City.
o Assessed 11 City buildings.
o Function and operational compared to immediate occupancy.
o Threat potential of three types of earthquakes.
e Project Approach
Displacement- based, which is a standard approach used for existing buildings.
o Applied Technology Council 21 Visual Screening Procedure
Basic, conducted in between 1 -3 hours.
Results caused the City to move further into seismic evaluation.
o American Society of Civil Engineers 31 -03 Detailed Seismic Evaluations
Minimum standard.
Three tiers, each of which gets more complex.
o American Society of Civil Engineers 41 -06 Performance Based Design
Determining objectives, establishing a budget and designing a building for
upgrade.
Rapid Visual Seismic Screening Results
o Provides relative rank and structural scores for each assessed building based on very
basic visual screenings. Detailed report leads to different ranks and assessments.
e Detailed Seismic Evaluation Results
o Overviewed each building individually. Significant detail provided in full report.
e Concept -Level Seismic Upgrades
o Provided structural upgrade /retrofit or replacements recommendations for each facility.
e Cost Estimates
Finance Safety Committee Minutes Seotember 3, 2008 Pace 2
After a lengthy discussion regarding the study, the Committee recommended forwarding the presentation
to the September 8 COW as an information only item. Due to the complexity, relative importance and
potential costs associated with the seismic report, the Committee recommended the item be discussed at
two separate Council meetings. The first meeting would focus on presentation of the report material
followed by a second meeting which would focus on the recommendations resulting from the report.
Several suggestions were made by Committee members to make the presentation material easier to
understand at full Council.
The Committee determined it will be clearer to separate the Facility Report (page 61 of the Committee
Agenda packet) into two separate charts. One chart will concentrate on the Reid Middleton
recommendations focusing only on retrofit, upgrades and replacement recommendations and costs. The
second chart will add other factors for consideration elaborating on staff recommendations based on
identified facility improvement needs, overall cost and timing issues. The inclusion of this additional
information is essential in providing a big picture/high level view of encompassing the needs of the
assessed City facilities.
This item will return to Committee at a later date for presentation and discussion of staff's
recommended actions, and will then return to full Council. FORWARD TO SEPTEMBER 8
COW FOR PRESENTATION AS INFORMATION ONLY AT THIS TIIIE. ITEM WILL
RETURN TO COMMITTEE FOR FURTHER/ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATION.
F. 2008 Second Ouarter Reports
Item removed from current agenda per Committee Chair.
III. ANNOUNCEMENTS
No announcements.
IV. MISCELLANEOUS
Meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m.
Next meeting: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 5:00 p.m. Conference Room 3
Committee Chair Approval
Minutes y KAM.
Tentative Agenda Schedule
MO Fi l�G v I� 3' T _2 EETI G 3
MEETING 4
RtGULAR C C7 V REGULAR- C QW.
September 2 (Tuesday) 8 15 22
1st —Labor Day Special Presentations: Special Presentation:
(City offices closed) See agenda packet Wellness Tukwila School District I
cover sheet for this presentation— report on student
29"° week's agenda Well City Award achievement
Fifth Monday of the (September 8, 2008 American Heart Dr. Linda Elman,
month —no Council Committee of the Whole Association "Fit Director of Research
meeting scheduled Meeting) City" award Evaluation, and
Dave Larson, Board i
Update on All Director
Nations Cup
(Sam Hassan) Special Issues:
Tukwila Village
Proclamations discussion
Appointments:
Mayor's Day of
Concern for the
Hungry CONLvit 1 EE OF THE
Appointment to WHOLE MEETING TO
Human Services BE FOLLOWED BY A
Advisory Board SPECIAL VI1 E1ING
Unfinished Business: Unfinished Business:
Seismic evaluation Authorize the Mayor
results to enter into exclusive
negotiations with a
developer for the
Tukwila Village project
October 6 13 20 27
Special Presentation:
Update on Duwamish
Riverbend Hill project
(Bruce Fletcher)
November 3 10 17 24
11th Veterans Day Public Hearing:
(City offices closed) 2009 proposed budget
27Th
Thanksgiving Day
(City offices closed)
28th Day after
Thanksgiving
(City offices closed)
c o m� g �Ylee e
SEPT I ER 2008
8th (Monday) 9th (Tuesday) 10th (Wednesday) 1Sth: Thursdaay) 12th (Friday) 13th (Saturday)
Gomintinity Transportation D Sister City D Sign Code
Affairs Cmte, Cmte, Advisory Sanctioned Centennial
community event:
Parks Conte 5:00 PM 5:30 PM Committee,
CANCELLED (CR (CR 43) 6:00 PM Corvette Club Car Show
Please note (Council Albert Lee Appliance
ty change in Chambers) (404 Strander Blvd.)
Committee of meeting 9:00 Am 12:00 NOON
the Whole location this
week
Mtg.,
7:00 PM SUNDAY, SEPT. 14
(Council Highway 99 Sanctioned Centennial
Chambers) Action Cmte, community event:
7:00 PM
(Community "Healing the Land
Center) Gathering"
(formerly known as the
Peace Potlatch)
Attendance at this event is
by invitation only.
/5tIvi(Mouday) 1611i: (Tuesday}
17th( 'ednesday)' "I8tir (Thiffsday) I ,19th. (Friday) =20th (Saturday)
D Utilities Cmte, D Finance D Crime Hot Domestic Human
5 :00 PM Safety Cmte, Spots Task Violence Task Services
(CR 41) 5:00 PM Force Mtg., Force, Providers,
(CR 43) 10 :00 AM 12:00 NOON 11:30 AM
(CR 45) (Human (Community
City Council Services office) Center)
Regular Mtg.,
7:00 PM Parks
(Council Commission, Tukwila
Chambers) 5:30 PM Historical
(Community Society,
Center) 7:00 PM
(George Long
D Library facility)
Advisory
Board,
7:00 PM
(Foster Library)
F Annual Curbside Clean -up Event Week of September 15 through 19 4
Available to single-family and duplex home residents who are customers of Allied Waste.
Place items out with your trash on your regular pickup day this week, and they will be collected for free! See brochure
under Special Notices section at www.ci.tukwila.wa.us for restrictions and other guidelines (or call 206 682 9735).
D Arts Commission: 1st Tues., 5:00 PM, Tukwila Community Center. Contact Stephanie Gardner at 206 -767 -2342.
Chamber of Commerce's Tukwila Government and Community Affairs Committee: 1st Tues., 12:00 Noon, Chamber Offices.
Contact Nancy Damon at 206 -575 -1633.
D City Council Committee of Whole (C.O.W.) Meeting: 2nd 4th Mon., 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall.
D City Council Regular Meeting: 1st 3rd Mon., 7:00 Pm, Council Chambers at City Hall.
D Civil Service Commission: 1st Mon., 5 :00 PM, Conf. Room 43. Contact Bev Willison at 206 433 -1844.
D Community Affairs Parks Committee: 2nd 4th Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room 43. 9/8/08 meeting has been cancelled.
D Crime Hot Spots Task Force: 3rd Wed., 10:00 Am, Conf. Room 45. Contact Phi Huynh at 206- 433 -7175.
D Domestic Violence Task Force: 3rd Thurs., 12:00 Noon, Human Services office. Contact Evie or Stacy at 206- 433 -7180.
D Equity Diversity Commission: 1st Thurs., 5:00 PM, Showalter Middle School Library. Contact Kimberly Atatej at 206- 433 -1834
D Finance Safety Committee: lst 3rd Tues., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room 83.
Highway 99 Action Committee: 2nd Tues., 7:00 PM, Tukwila Community Center. Contact Chief Dave Haynes at 206 433 -1812.
Human Services Advisory Brd: 2nd Fri. of even months, 10 :00 Am, Human Services Office. Contact Evie Boykan at 206- 433 -7180
➢Human Services Providers: Quarterly, 11:30 AM, TCC (2008 3/21, 6/20, 9/19, and 12/5). Contact Stacy Hansen at 206 433 -718;
D Library Advisory Board: 3rd Wed., 7:00 PM, Foster Library. Contact Stephanie Gardner at 206- 767 -2342.
D Parks Commission: 3rd Wed., 5:30 Pm, Senior Game Room at Community Center. Contact Stephanie Gardner at 206 767 -2342.
D Planning Commission/Board of Architectural Review: 4th Thurs., except 2nd Thursday in Nov. Dec., 7 :00 PM,
Council Chambers at City Hall. Contact Wynetta Bivens at206- 431 -3670.
D Sister City Committee: 1st Wed., 5:30 PM, Conf. Room #3. Contact Bev Willison at 206- 433 -1844.
D; Transportation Committee: 2nd 4th Tues., 5 :00 PM, Conf. Room #2, Agenda item for 9/9/08 meeting: (A) Tukwila Urban
Center pedestrian/bicycle bridge type, size, and location draft report.
➢Tukwila Historical Society: 3rd Thurs., 7:00 PM (meeting location varies). Contact Pat Brodin at 206 -433 -1860.
D Utilities Committee: 1st 3rd Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room #1.
Court Busy Court and/or Jury Calendar (noted to alert employees and citizens of potential parking difficulty).