The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOW 2008-07-14 Item 4C - Discussion - 2008 Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Rezone Review Process CO UNCIL A GENDA SYNOPSIS 'i J .rIILA Q 4 :y Initials ITEM NO. y O Pest i ly Meeting- Date Prepared by 1 Mayor's review nnciI review Q1 e/// sI 07/14/08 1 RF 1 �"i a 07/21/08 1 RF 1(1 7808 Lo ITEM INFORMATION I CAS NUMBER 08-085 I ORIGINAL, AGENDA DATE: JULY 14, 2008 AGENDA ITEM TI17,1'. 2008 Comprehensive Plan amendments CATI i (X )RY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Meeting Other Altg Date 7/14/08 tlltg Date 07/21/08 Altg Date Altg Date Altg Date Altg Date 07/14/08 Altg Date 1 SP )NSC )R 1 1 Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PW SPONSOR'S Briefing and public meeting on a 2008's Comprehensive Plan amendment rezone review SUMMARY process. The City of Tukwila has received a request to change the designation of 1.4 acres in the eastern portion of a property located at 152xx 65th Avenue South from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Medium Density Residential (MDR) RI .\'II .WED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte U Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte n Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DA 1'E: 6/9/08 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Consideration and Discussion COMMI1TEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EYPI?NDrruRI: Rl ,`UIRI sD AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED Fund Source: Comments: MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 7/14/08 MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS 7/14/08 1 Informational memorandum dated 7/8/08, with Attachments 1 9 Minutes from Community Affairs Parks Committee meeting of 6/9/08 are Attachment 1 of memo Mme y tt 1,� l City of Jim Haggerton, Mayor E Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director 1908 MEMORANDUM July 8, 2008 To: Tukwila City Council From: Mayor Haggerton SUBJECT: ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR 2008 ISSUE On July 14, 2008, there will be briefing on a request for a Comprehensive Plan amendment/rezone, and the review process. A public meeting will be held to receive comments on the potential amendment. After discussion and public meeting, the City Council will make a threshold decision whether to forward the proposed amendment to the Planning Commission for further consideration at this point. It is not necessary to consider the specific merits or substance of the request to make this decision. BACKGROUND Three applications for Comprehensive Plan amendments were received by the December 31, 2007 deadline for review during 2008. One file was closed due to incompleteness, and the second was withdrawn. One remaining proposal for Comprehensive Plan amendment will be considered for review. The Community Affairs and Parks Committee was briefed on this issue on June 9, 2008. (Attachment 1) REVIEW PROCESS The procedure for City Council review is illustrated by Attachment 2. The Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone process has several steps, with opportunities for public comment at each point. The first step in Council's consideration is to take comments and evaluate the proposed amendment at a public meeting. After holding its public meeting, the Council will evaluate each proposed amendment according to the following review criteria: Is the issue already adequately addressed in the Comprehensive Plan? Rf 1 07/09/2008 0 \Como Plan 2007- 2008 \Woodland View 107 -096 L07- 097\CCmeetino memo .7.14 0803 doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 431 -3670 Fax: 206 431 -3665 If the issue is not addressed in the Comprehensive Plan, is there a public need for the proposed change? Is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? Will the proposed change result in a new benefit to the community? Following its initial consideration of a proposed amendment, the Council shall make a threshold decision consisting of one of the following actions: Refer the proposal as -is to the Planning Commission for further review; Modify the proposal and refer to the Planning Commission for further review; Defer consideration for one year to get additional information; Reject the proposal. The threshold decision is not whether to approve the request, but whether to forward it to the Planning Commission for more review and a public hearing. Consideration of this year's site specific amendment is a quasi judicial decision. The Planning Commission will consider any application that is forwarded from the City Council, hold a public hearing, and make a recommendation based on the substance of the request. Afterwards, the issue will return to the City Council for briefings, a final public hearing, deliberation and a decision. At that point, the Council may: Adopt a proposed amendment; Adopt a modified version of a proposed amendment; or Reject the amendment. DISCUSSION /ANALYSIS /ALTERNATIVES The application is as follows: Redesignate property from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Medium Density Residential (MDR) at 152xx 65 Avenue South Applicant: Raymond Carlstedt (File #L07 -096 and L07 -097) The applicant seeks to redesignate approximately 1.41 acres in the eastern portion of a 5.8 acre site located at 152xx 65 Avenue South from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Medium Density Residential (MDR). (Attachment 3) Site: The entire site is wooded and contains two separate wetlands and their associated buffers. MDR is proposed only for the eastern part of the property nearest to 65 Avenue South. The rest of the site would remain as LDR, leaving the wetlands and their buffers unaffected by the rezone. Future development would occur on the eastern edge of the property. (Attachment 4) Although this is not a factor in considering the Comprehensive Plan amendment/Rezone request, the applicant proposes to donate that portion of the property that is not part of the proposal (approximately 4.4 acres) to the City of Tukwila. Rf 2 07/09/2008 Q: \Comp Plan 2007 2008 \Woodland View L07 -096 L07- 097 \CCmeeting.memo.7.14.08#3.doc Vicinity: A mix of single family and multi family dwelling units is in the vicinity. 14 single family homes are directly north in the Maple Tree subdivision, while approximately 260 units of apartment and condominium units are east across 65 Avenue South (Maple Leaf, Canyon Estates, Park View) on land that is zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR). There are several single family homes to the south, as well as the 60+ unit San Juan South apartments. The Sunwood Condominiums are in the HDR zone to the west. Single- family homes are to the west of the site. Tukwila Park is approximately one block from the site along 65 Avenue South. The property has been the object of several development proposals in the past. In the late 1980s, the entire site, including both wetlands, was considered for a subdivision proposal that was eventually dropped. The current proposal is different from the earlier project since it affects only to the eastern area along 65 Avenue South. All wetlands and associated buffer areas are excluded from the rezone, and would be retained. The applicant has submitted a proposed, sample site plan. (Attachment 6). Medium Density Residential (MDR) zoning allows a maximum of 14.5 units /acre as duplex, triplex or fourplex buildings. This site plan has not been formally reviewed by staff. Any future multi family development would require a separate application, would need to meet zoning requirements and would trigger design review. The site is constrained by slopes, wetland and wetland buffer, and could be appropriate for development through a Planned Residential Development (PRD). The PRD permits greater flexibility in zoning requirements in order to encourage imaginative site design, retain the natural environment and create greater open space on sites with environmentally sensitive areas, such as this one. PRD development could potentially allow more units to be built on the site than if standard zoning were applied to a site with environmentally sensitive areas. Discussion Criteria: 1. Is the issue already adequately addressed in the Comprehensive Plan? Plan Objective #1 —To improve and sustain residential neighborhood quality and livability Goal 3.1 Continue to provide the City's fair share of regional housing Policy 3.1.1 Provide sufficient zoned housing potential to accommodate future single- and multi family households. Policy 7.6.3 Allow Planned Residential Developments (PRDs) for multi- and single family use on properties with wetlands or Rf 3 07/09/2008 Q: \Comp Plan 2007- 2008\Woodland View L07 -096 L07- 097 \CCmeeting.memo.7.14.08#3.doc watercourses, or within the Tukwila South Master Plan Area in conjunction with the City Council's approval of a master plan. 2. If the issue is not addressed in the Comprehensive Plan, is there a public need for the proposed change? The issue is addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Is the proposed change the best means for meeting the identified public need? Changing the zoning from LDR to MDR would allow additional multi- family housing to be built. 4. Will the proposed change result in a new benefit to the community? The proposed change would create opportunity for an increased supply of multi family housing, either owner or renter occupied. It would reduce the land available for single family housing. Public Comments: In response to a meeting notice that was sent to properties within 500' of the project site, three Tukwila residents sent letters for consideration at the July 14 public meeting. (Attachments 7, 8 and 9) Next Steps: After holding a public meeting and discussion, the City Council will decide by motion among the following alternatives: Refer the proposal as is to the Planning Commission for further review; Modify the proposal and refer the Planning Commission for further review; Defer consideration until a later time —to get more information; Reject the proposal. If the application is referred by the Council to the Planning Commission, it will return before the Council for briefings, a final public hearing, deliberation and a decision Attachments 1. C.A.P. minutes (6/9/08) 2. Amendment Review Process Chart 3. Applications 4. Zoning Map 5. Aerial Map with 10' contours 6. Proposed Site Plan 7. Letter —David and Gloria Yoshino 8. Letter —Jeff Anderson 9. Letter —Maria C. Notch Rf 4 07/09/2008 Q: \Comp Plan 2007 2008 \Woodland View L07 -096 L07- 097 \CCmeeting.memo.7.14.08#3.doc Community Affairs Parks Committee Minutes June 9. 2008 Paige 2 C. 2008 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Staff summarized and provided a brief overview of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments annual review process. One application has been submitted for the City's consideration. The application is seeking to redesignate a portion of land from single family residential (LDR) to medium density residential (MDR) near 152XX 65 Avenue South. Staff is seeking full Council determination of whether or not to forward the proposed amendment to the Planning Commission for further consideration. The Committee requested staff make some corrections in the analysis section of the informational memo clarifying the accuracy of residential density designation of surrounding properties. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JULY 14 DISCUSSION. D. Draft Walk and Roll Plan This item was brought forth to the Community Affairs Parks Committee as information only; the Transportation Committee will serve as the recommending committee for full Council action. Staff provided an overview of the draft Walk and Roll Plan which was previously distributed to Council. The following six recommend actions were highlighted as tools for building a connected non motorized transportation network in Tukwila: 1. Adopt Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure Designs Upgrade /update design standards for bicycle and pedestrian facilities. 2. Designate and Adopt Bicycle Friendly Routes Update the City's Non Motorized Transportation Plan. 3. Continue Construction of Neighborhood Links —Prioritize unimproved rights -of -way. 4. More than the Minimum for Pedestrian Safety Include extra details for improving walkability designs. 5. Railbanking Use of abandoned railroad spurs for trails. 6. Biking and Walking Programs Provide education, promotion and participation in such programs. The draft Plan is currently available on the City's website, and staff has been gathering suggestions from the public as well as the City's Planning Commission. Additional review of the Plan will take place at the Transportation Committee meeting scheduled for June 10, 2008. INFORMATION ONLY. M. MISCELLANEOUS Meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Next meeting: Monday, June 23, 2008 5:00 p.m. Conference Room #3 -f Committee Chair Approval M "11utes by KAM. Attachment 2 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process Options for Council Review Threshold Review Process Reject Refer to Defer Proposal Planning Proposal Commission Environmental Review T Planning Commission Hearing/Recommendation City Council Review/Discussion Attachment 3 4-‘ -NIP CITY OF TUKW COMPREHENSIVE Department of Community Development 1 r 1f It 10_,%,, O 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 PLAN --ar% Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 N i 2: E -mail: tukplan@atukwila.wa.us Ian tukwila M wa.us AENLl�'1L' �m��{�+ NTS 1903 APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P -CPA Planner: (eig f x I File Number: h U Q Application. Complete (Date: E 1'6) Project File Number: y •Z u Application Incomplete (Date: Other File Numbers: L. 1 c)(-1(0 I NAME OF PROJECT/DE VELOPI`/IENT: \100-4 [acid t 2 c J Lo,NPre,l' e:LAs i u z 1)lav, AAvoci `t LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL-TAX LOT-NUMBERS-(this information may be found on your tax statement). 760 C,) CO '07 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR The individual who: has decision making authority on behalf of the owner /applicant in meetings with City staff, has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Ph. r3 :-,.f/ �_r i /51 Sr l t 9(iv Address: g 5 tom 162. T Phone: ?.0,e; --'13 2- '25/C FAX: E -mail: Signature: /C ,irt z J L ,Date: 2/ 7 12 P: \Planning Forms\ Applications \CompPlanChg- 6 -06.doc December 4, 2006 A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Existing: Z l) Proposed B. ZONING DESIGNATION: Existing: Proposed: z'f f' 12 C. LAND USE(S): Existing: e l r- r Proposed: 1 cc 114 T (for proposed changes in land use designations or rezones) D. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING LAND USES: Describe the existing uses located within 1,000 feet in all directions from the property or area for which a change is proposed. l n i� -e C' rr 4z 7Z h- I �QL ro f l�r it ir_ ED% r Cc Aizei t't i s t' h s f�' CL:s 1A.)-e_ilci etc l ca P: \Planning Forms\ Applications \ConnpPlanChg- 6.06.doc December 9, 2006 1 3 .EG I\ MO 08 2c. AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DES OPT M T WE WILL ATTEMPT TO EXPLAIN YOUR REASONS TO CHANGE THE ZONING ON KING COUNTY PARCEL #3597000260. CRITERIA QUESTIONS: 1. A DETAILED STATEMENT OF WHAT IS PROPOSED AND WHY; THE PROPOSAL IS TO CHANGE TUIE ZONING TO MATCH THE SURROUNDING DENSITY. WE PROPOSE TO REQUEST EITHER HIGH DENSITY FOR APARTMENTS OR MEDIUM DENSITY FOR DUPLEXES. 2. A STATEMENT OF THE ANTICIPATED IMPACTS OF THE CHANGE, INCLUDING THE GEOGGRAPHIC AREA AFFECTED AND ISSUES PRESENTED BY THE PROPSED CHANGE; THIS PARCEL IS LOCATED AT THE HIGHEST POINT IN THE AREA. A 35,000 S. F. WETLAND IS ON SITE. THE IMPACT OF THIS PROPOSAL WILL BE MINAMUL WITH PROPER BUFFERS TO PROTECT THE WETLAND. 3. AN EXPLANATION OF WHY THE CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ARE DEFICIENT OR SHOULD NOT CONTINUE IN EFFECT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT REQULATIONS NOT DEFICIENT. WE WANT TO CONFORM TO THE SURROUNDING ZONING. 4. A STATEMENT OF HOW THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT COMPLIES WITH THE AND PROMOTES THE GOALS AND SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT. THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT TAKES INTO ACCOUNT ENVIROMENTAL GOALS AND REQUIREMENTS. IT IS OUR PLAN DEDICATE THE MAJORITY OF THIS PROPERTY TO THE CITY SO THAT THE Ni TAGRITY OF THE WETLANDS CAN BE PRESERVED. 5. A STATEMENT OF HOW THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT COMPLIES WITH APPLICABLE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICI r:S. 14 PLANNING POLICS USALLY SUPPORT THE CREATION OF PARKS AND PLACES THAT PROVIDE THE PUBLIC WHT RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES. THIS WETLAND WITH WALKING TRAILS AROUD THE BUFFER IS SUCH AN ACTIVITY. 6. A STATEMENT OF WHAT CHANGES, IF ANY WOULD BE REQUIRED IN FUNCTIONAL PLANS IF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT IS ADOPTED. THE SITE HAS ALL THE UTILITY SERVICES LOCATED IN THE STREET. STORMWATER WILL HAVE TO BE CHANNELED AWAY FROM THE WETLANDS. THIS WILL BE ENGINNERED BY A LICENSED CIVIL ENGINER. 7. A STATEMENT OF WHAT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS, IF ANY, WOULD BE NEEDED TO SUPPORT THE PROPOSED CHANGE, AND HOW THE PROPOSED CHANGE WILL AFFECT THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN. NO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE NEEDED FORM THE CITY. THE THE DEVELOPER OF THE SITE WILL INCUR AL THE COSTS. THE WILL BENEFIT FROM THE TAXATION ON THE FINISHED PROJECT. 8. A STATEMENT OF WHAT OTHER CHANGES, IF ANY ARE REQUIRED IN IN THE CITY CODES, PLANS OR REGULATIONS TO IMPLEMENT THE PROPOSED CHANGES. THE CITY CODES WILL NOT HAVE TO BE CHANGED. THE PROJECT WILL BE BUILT TO ALL CITY CODES. D 15 cL,a,�.,,, CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 1 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA J 98188 tat v;� O Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 7�'; ep L E -mail: tukvlan@ci.tukwila.wa.us 1908 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON ss COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I'the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contain°.d in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grams the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contra tors or er representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at t Xk C o r D C 5 A for the purpose of application review, for the Limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. Non responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. S 4 EXE D at e (city), `k A (state), on 20 07 W ct m a 1 0 5c-4 -1 R Print Name ei y c. /5Y c /A 9,6 r t. K j t.i `tJ Address Z2 4i„ ,k/6 r'a c%L'c/ Phone Number /J)(< 232- l2(-16 c= S ignature //1'.. On this day personally appeared before me i'tn �c�3c.c to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknoarll;dged that he/she signed the satrte as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. .SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS a:I r D Y OF yY- 20 T 15; NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington 'f. PA-4/`1"1"%- 1 t: residing at t W it u My Commission expires on 3 --2- 3 -1 0 December 4, 2096 1 6 P: \Planning Forms\ �Yppltations \CnmpPlanChg- 6.06.doc CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development ZONI NG CODE j 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila WA 98188 7i EN 1 ATE-+ t 4'111N. O', Tele (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 AMENDMENTS S i 2 E-mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us 1908 APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Permits Plus Type: P -ZCA Planner: 6 GC A. f G File Number: 1_01 v ti t Application Complete (Date: 1 Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: Other File Numbers: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Gt 4th -.4 frtl l �sn LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. rte. YX Z% Ax. UST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS (this information may be found on your tax statement). (O e 6n —0'7 )EVELOPMENT COORDINATOR 'he individual who: has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. ame: Ze, t.‘ 41 G' X 7c-el,' ddress: 2, ''7 2 7012 "'Y tone: ZL% `i L4'6 FAX: mail: ;nature: Alf lf 9../r, -.7 e Date: 2.A/k) 1 7 ng Forms \Applications \ZoneChng- 6- US.doc December 4, 2006 December 28, 2007 3 Ray Carlsted C 3921 SW 102 St. Seattle, WA 98146 RE: Estate of Al White Property 65 Street, City of Tukwila Dear Ray: The above referenced site was evaluated for wetlands. The site contains what appears •to be two wetlands. A western Category 2 wetland that will be far from any development and the eastern Category 3 wetland. The eastern wetland determines the extent of development. The eastern edge of the east wetlands was flagged and surveyed. The wetland has been previously determined to be a Category 3 wetland with a standard 50 foot buffer. This letter serves as a preliminary report to assist the estate in marketing the property. A final report with all the necessary information will be provided when needed. The east edge of the eastern Category 3 wetland will have a 50 foot buffer, The land between the edge of the buffer and the street is developable with regards to wetlands. Buffer averaging my be used for a final lot layout. If you have any questions please feel free to call me. Sincerely, J /1 AJ Bredberg PWS, CPSS, CPSC 4369L2 1 8 3303 43rd St. NW Gig Harbor, WA 98335, USA 253.858.7055 Fax: 253.858.2534 ajb @wa.net A w, .e P•41 rtA d el 7' ,--,7 I ./V0 e+ t. '51- 2 1 5,...:„.1.1. i--- et /-45./.._rs cl-ef. 5/ i X pi-.0/) e ri 1)/ 1 •C ---e i 6 t. 1 17, ,e e c/ Li2/4 0 ii e px 50 A151 11s/ Ft' r 3 -7 i DOL.i. 1 A. .E.:_A57-, 01,tic2: .at 0/iv/ sib A .,..x7e,ti,)t-eki .Z. 6 J•% -.S 4 X C. CV -e *4 fiAl a Al 0 pi A i /-0 7LA t /0 e,734 0 F 44-e.. C; n t.14,11 7 (r 1 9 gttachme -at 4 a' ----1 -,(1) -A )\\\\I ill\Pft Act j Lc) 1 --g 19i c 11 '1 '1 V.-- R S 51 S LD j \\SvA, s\--s,%.,,,,,,,ts.„%ii 1 1 M° ii,4. \\\\t\— molt ,.`Z S ubject.Pr4Pe `1 0 Asiyt DR 1. H 1 LpR HDR R 1 f• 4p `pRtoH (5- Propose oo d�and View 497 city r 1.07496 10 ORTH FF tt r ---116 —r r Attachment S '7-.4-417- R t 0 r F n ai y t. rt. =-:1-.0-1-' -a: _._--:.:f' .4/ ,1-,:,,,,,,, 7-:_:," 1 ,r-it .f=i j-r: iill't:&t.- -t. it:-;5-!,i.. i.. t 11 ,..it;XiVi .,1,* jj:__;f:-__-i:s,-':-%;:;-_e- _A-7,1- J. 16' 1 A- .v F E 3- R 'fi r 5 tc r A r Or 7 s t p r f X15 a .r te Y� e y� r f �z A „i!,0::'- iit_ltr_:'..-(44-r-,tlii;W.- ___.."---re..:":,-.*:grt-L-T- 1-$.-,r7,4'.k.,_t f&M,e_'-. i7711,1_-_--.4W--_ .-1"-4--- A r_j.kiF ,!.,,,,_:.a._i.___,„..:.,,,......,:*,...,;:_,:_,,„_,a-i!..7-c.,,;,":111-17,-,,,p:lei-,.._,,,,a,5-,:-IT,t4-; wtz-iy..,t,z:- lig 4:,-:: 4 t i rg 5=-:';.:- 4--tft. 4/1. -i t----- •=4" q=k1: fi --1 t =';f-...-,T.T.,-A--k----:`,K=,,N -."'14,-;-_:.7- .4 „,zi- 7 4., iN I .;!F:4 I _{.4!";4:- .1: 4.1 Ave 0) i aim 41-41r 1,, l J y lF i� 3' c Fi` 'F n +c. fi i� i'a- .--5 P c� z t 3 J` F cam• v R 4-* "s F. r L sue Q 4 A -c, a� t r im` +Yi.r s e .r r T S- �7 .i ce a E EQJ w S vue- a te --A.-P4--- £f x ___q g137-i- 22 ,tr"- -Iii.j.--_- 2:2,- iiiT472-: :-,:-,7::,-4. i:,--mVi'::--,7Z---N-"--` '-4""--'1---:' -4--- F Q -T Fes, `:�4gt:=" bc-! r Z y T' r s _X 5 g T s' B. t om it i te! -z 3- "ti i E r �-c_ 2 s r.X i; +tea.-- t c ",e rte E sy I a f r r r r2 •mss r t� {_.,.tea.- a t 1.1 ma y E .fi t ttf- L1 r ::Y-'-,,S.''. s. -..7,5--,T; -T'Cl"2:-.1W5:1:1.-,--. .7 i i a <.-k--.,■4 •,0 ...;.-tA :7 ;t1 ,41 7 ii Z' :.-'.;Ji-IrgIF., 01- •a-f ficl tAt: --r 3 -`-f -fi= r K t �i i t om' -Al :1 J I a��,e At t achmen.t 6 cr) 5 74 A3 c. m g $.1 c• P I ri Q 0 0 1 i I7 g b E I F l 2 I A i• lz p ra n n 4 a Z.5.: 1 =Ma 0 P c• M A c•• P A- 9 P crP• rs, 1 0 tg CI 0 o N. r.. E. g X t g INN C2 44 4 62ND AVE. S. 2 40121197 3..a3r T 40 4 4 6' 70 1 la 0 IR 2 71 r 3... 7 g V) -I g ■11 Ti, e• rn 1 3;\ 4 '4 rT: :71 1411 r .c, 8-' fa E E e b N 1 239.434 I -I PiT.,'ff- g A li c= I A 5 tbse 2 2-PLEX -STORY 1 i r a 1 10 g 4 2 8 i I- Z 1 4 R -q F 2 51 I ti• I K 8 0.5 A 6 2 0 1 316 sA -c 0 it 1' 01' (I it b I 1 CD 140 ft I 4 CI il /7 0 ll) a n o MD ASE S. r n pa o s ,.e 0-■ ....AV c• z ca. r, LI ti) i .5 ,-A A 0 Ef 9 9 i, 8." (.71 r- Fr co o c., i-_ __,_ro g N Ft 'S rn ,a II cn .u. 0 CD 1 .:3 CACENIEZ 312•11 ri• 00 0 CI 61 Er 0 0 z< cs i.e•-...-401 0 CO -I ;S: 0 11:0- Ka 7z, La 131E81-->IK-N.■ Attachment 7 City of Tukwila N 7:8 Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. #100 DEv i" UN/ M EN Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Zoning change requested at 152)(x-65 Avenue So. Dear Sirs: As homeowners in Maple Tree Park (lot #10) for 12 years, we do not want to see two story duplexes built 20 feet from our backyard. We, as well as the homeowners of lots #5 -9, bought our homes because of the greenbelt backing the property. All of the Maple Tree Park homes (valued at $500K or more) would prefer only single family homes built_ in our neighborhood, or at least on our block. We have more than enough rentals on the east side of 65 Avenue South from which we can hear so many parking lot arguments, car alarms, loud sports fans yelling at their tv's, etc. We therefore strongly urge you to keep Parcel #3597000360 zoned as Low Density Residential. Respectfully yours, David Gloria Yoshino 6361 S.151 PL dated June 17, 2008. RECEIVED Attachment 8 'JUN 1 8 Me GOMMUNi DEVELOP NT City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 16 June 2008 To whom it may concern, Hello. I am writing to voice my opposition to the development proposed at the east end of the property located at 152XX 65th Avenue South (Parcel #3597000360). That area along 65th Avenue South is already one of the least attractive areas of Tukwila east of I -5, occupied on the east side of the road by somewhat run -down apartment buildings. Additionally, and perhaps more pertinent, is the fact that 65th Avenue South is lined by parked cars (some that appear abandoned), presumably overflow from the people that live in the apartments. Adding more people and more cars to the area would likely make the situation worse. Currently, the only saving grace for that area is Tukwila Park on the east side of the street and the trees on the west side, where this development is planned. Whatever is done, please ensure that the area is improved, rather than making a bad situation worse. Thank you for your consideration. 7 Jeff Anderson 15115 Sunwood Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 /�C Attachment 9 'JUN 2 6 2M COPritan4i Y DEVELOPMENT 6/25/2008 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd #100 Tukwila, WA Subject: Zoning, Parcel 3597000360 I want to express my objection to the change in zoning of the subject parcel from LDR to MDR. This change is likely for the purpose of constructing condominiums or apartments in an area where there is already an overabundance (east of 65th Ave S and on 62nd Ave S, including Sunwood blvd). The zoning classification MDR is not consistent with the housing west of 65th Ave S and adjacent to S 151st and S 153rd Streets. The housing there is mostly separate, single family residences with medium to large sized lots. I believe this area should be maintained and set aside for separate, single family residences, and not the higher density residences allowed with MDR zoning. Sincerely, 9 /4/6‘t Maria C Notch 1405 Harrington Ave S, Renton, WA 98058 (Owner, Crystal Ridge Condominiums Unit A -304)