HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2008-07-14 Item 4I - Agreement - Membership Audit Acceptance with Cascade Water Alliance COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
J�.TfILA
0 i 12 Il i11/1 No.
t Meeting Date f Prepared by 1 ilVIayor'.r review I Council review
w; lip= 1 7/14/08 P-
a,[ p. 1
I 7/21/08 1 PBC .~i 14
1
1 1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 08-091 I ORIGI IAL AGENDA DATE: JULY 14, 2008
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Cascade Water Alliance Membership Audit Acceptance Agreement
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date 7/14/08 Mtg Date 7/21/08 Meg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date !vItg Date:
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adrn Svcs DCD Finance Fire Le P&.R Police PW
SPONSOR'S Cascade Water Alliance (CWA) has completed each member's water audit agreement. These
SUMMARY water audits outline the supply relationship between CWA and its members. The City of
Tukwila does not have an independent supply source for water as we purchase all of our
wholesale water from CWA (currently Seattle water through the Cascade Block). Tukwila's
audit documents the specific parameters of all of Tukwila's water delivery points in different
locations throughout the City.
REVIEWED COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
BY U tilities Cmte
❑Arts Comm. ❑Parks Comm. El Planning Comm.
DATE: 07/07/08
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Authorize Mayor to sign Agreement with CWA.
CotiMirIn E Unanimous approval; forward to COW.
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
N/A N/A
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE J RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
07/14/08
I
07/21/08
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
07/14/08 Information Memo dated July 1, 2008 (revised after UC meeting)
Agreement with CWA with Exhibit A (audit)
Utilities Committee Meeting Minutes from 7/07/08
07/21/08
Highline water district intertie
Water district 75 intertie
Water district #75 intertie
INFORMATION MEMO
To: Mayor Haggerton
From: Public Works Director
Date: July 1, 2008 (J
Subject: Cascade Water Alliance (CWAI Member Water Audit Agreement
ISSUE
Cascade Water Alliance's Water Audit Agreements are to be approved and executed by each
member agency.
BACKGROUND
After many long years of negotiation and hard work by member staff and elected officials who
serve on Cascade's Resource and Planning Committee, each member's water audit agreement, as
required by the interlocal contract, is ready for execution. Tukwila's contract with CWA
specifies the parameters at all of Tukwila's delivery points, including the minimum and
maximum hydraulic gradient (in feet) that can be supplied from the wholesale system, as shown
in the attached Member Water Audit (Exhibit A).
Compared to other wholesalers, the City of Tukwila's long -term drinking water supply is in very
good shape. This is due, in part, because our water system is intertied with Kent, Renton and
Highline Water Districts. Other options are being analyzed, such as wheeling, which is when
water is conveyed from one system to another, such as if we purchase water from Tacoma and it
has to pass through Kent's water system to arrive in Tukwila.
Another initiative that will slow Tukwila's demand for potable water is our partnership with
King County Department of Natural Resources via the Renton Wastewater Treatment Facility in
the form of Class A reclaimed water. This is a very unique situation when compared to the
remainder of King County.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the Mayor to sign CWA Water Alliance Member Audit Agreement.
Attachment: Membership Audit Acceptance Agreement with Exhibit A City of Tukwila Member Water Audit
P: \Utilities Info Memo\Info Memo UC 070208 Cascade Audit Agreements.doc
MEMBERSHIP AUDIT ACCEPTANCE AGREEMENT
Between
CASCADE WATER ALLIANCE
And
CITY OF TUKWILA
MEMBER
May 23, 2008
Cascade Water Alliance "Cascade and the City of Tukwila "Tukwila enter into this
Membership Audit Acceptance Agreement (the "Audit Agreement with respect to Tukwila's
public water system.
Article I: Authority Audit Predicate Audit Definitions
Section 1.1 Authority. Article V, Section 5.2.2 of the Cascade Water Alliance
Amended and Restated Interlocal Contract, dated December 15, 2004, (the "Interlocal requires
an audit of each Member's water system and Independent Supply, if any, for the purposes of (1)
determining Cascade's supply obligation to that Member, (2) recognizing when the Member has
lost Independent Supply, and '(3) allocating credits against the Member's Regional Capital
Facility Charge for its Independent Supply.
Section 1.2 Audit Predicate. Cascade's supply obligations (water quantity and
quality) and related supply obligations and the Member's obligations concerning planning,
conservation, shortage management, Independent Supply, and payment of Rates and Charges
are established by the Interlocal. This Audit Agreement is intended to implement, not modify the
Interlocal, and nothing herein shall change the benefits or obligations of a party to the Interlocal.
Section 1.3 Audit. This Audit Agreement incorporates and adopts the audit of
Tukwila's public water system, dated May 23, 2008, performed by Cascade Water Alliance (the
"Audit The Audit was performed according to a methodology adopted by the Board of
Directors of Cascade (the "Board") in Resolution No. 2008 -04. The original Audit is on file with
Cascade. A true and accurate copy is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 1.4 Definitions. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Agreement
shall have the meaning assigned to them in the Interlocal. The following words have the
following meanings when used in this Agreement:
a) Production Requirement The quantity (seasonal and annual) of water a
Member is required to supply from its Independent Supply as established by
the Audit and set forth in Section V of Exhibit A.
b) Failure to meet Production Requirement A Member's voluntary or
involuntary failure to meet Production Requirements and so declared by a
resolution of the Board.
c) Loss of Supply A Member's permanent Failure to Meet Production
Requirements, or a portion thereof, and so declared by a resolution of the
Board.
Article II: Independent Supply
The Audit accurately identifies and quantifies Tukwila's Independent Supply for the
purpose of establishing Cascade's supply commitment to Tukwila.
Audit Acceptance Agreement Page 2 of 7 May 23, 2008
Article 111: Supply Commitment
Cascade's supply commitment, as provided in the Interlocal and further defined by the
Audit, shall be implemented through the Points of Delivery that are identified in Exhibit A.
Article IV: Wheeling
All existing wheeling arrangements between Members or between Members and non-
members as described in Exhibit A shall remain in effect. For future wheeling arrangements,
Cascade shall pay wheeling charges when, in the judgment of the Board, a wheeling
arrangement represents a cost effective way to provide water to a Member or non member.
Article V: Points of Delivery
Section 5.1 Cascade shall either own, or by contract with Seattle, have wholesale
master meters at all points of delivery of the regional transmission system as set forth in Exhibit
A.
Section 5.2 Costs related to installation of future wholesale master meters initiated
by Cascade shall be borne by Cascade. The cost of installing any future wholesale master
meters not initiated by Cascade and not listed in Exhibit A shall be charged pursuant to
Cascade's fiscal policies to the entity (Member or non member) receiving the water.
Section 5.3 The hydraulic gradients for the points of delivery are established in
Exhibit A. A Member may request changes to such hydraulic gradient(s) to avoid adverse
impacts to their distribution system. Cascade shall assume the initial cost of any adjustments
required at the Member supply connection to match the defined range. Cascade shall also
assume the initial cost of any adjustments (within the Member's distribution system) resulting
from changes to the defined hydraulic gradient range caused by Cascade. Thereafter, the cost
of any subsequent adjustments shall be bome by each individual Member. Under emergency
conditions or other unusual short -term operating situations, Cascade shall not be obligated to
meet minimum hydraulic gradients.
Article VI: RCFC Credits Independent Supply Production Requirements Loss
Section 6.1 Award of Credits. According to the Audit, Tukwila is entitled to and
shall have 0 credits against the Regional Capital Facilities Charge.
Section 6.2 Production Requirements Waiver
6.2.1 Tukwila accepts the Audit and the Production Requirement established by the
Audit and set forth in Exhibit A, and agrees to produce water from its Independent Supply in an
amount at least sufficient to meet its Production Requirements.
Audit Acceptance Agreement Page 3 of 7 May 23, 2008
6.2.2 The Board may temporarily modify or waive Production Requirements when:
a. the modification or waiver will not result in any increased demand upon
CnQrr•la nr any increased Cost to Cascade;
b. the modification or waiver is based upon unforeseen events such as
equipment failure, natural disaster, or other situation that could not have
been reasonably foreseen by Member(s);
c. the modification or waiver is based upon a planned temporary interruption
of production as might be needed to perform routine maintenance or
modification to a Member's system, the impacts of which have been
coordinated in advance with Cascade;
d. the modification or waiver is warranted by considerations of equity and
fairness as determined in the sole discretion of the Board;
e. the modification or waiver is based upon an agreed demand mitigation
plan submitted by a Member and accepted by the Board; or
f. The modification or waiver is in effect only for a specified and limited (not
to exceed one year) period of time.
Section 6.3 Production Requirements Administration and Enforcement.
Production Requirements shall be administered and enforced as follows:
6.3.1 Cascade will monitor Members' Independent Supply and Cascade's supply to
Members through the collection of necessary reports and data. Cascade will evaluate
Independent Supply production relative to Production Requirements and periodically report to
Members on status. The frequency of such reports will be determined by practical timeframes
for receipt and compilation of necessary data from regional and local sources. If a Member fails
to meet Production Requirements, Cascade will notify the Member and the Board as soon as
practical.
6.3.2 Each year, Cascade will periodically assess the supply and demand situation to
determine whether Production Requirements may be waived or reduced based on a finding of
surplus in water supply capacity or capability relative to demands. In the event of shortage
conditions invoking shortage response, Cascade will work with Members to maximize those
Members' reliance on Independent Supply while recognizing that concurrent demand reductions
may cause de facto reductions in the ability to put Independent Supply to full productive use.
6.3.3 The Production Requirement shall be reduced pro rata to reflect a reduction in
demand levels in any year. For this purpose, Cascade shall determine the actual Cascade
usage per CERU for its collective Members, divide this usage by the standard usage per CERU
established and used by Cascade, and multiply this ratio times the Production Requirement.
This shall be done separately for annual and peak season demands and Production
Requirements.
6.3.4 Shortfalls in production that are not waived by the Board or otherwise satisfied by
any of the foregoing shall be documented by a resolution of the Board that shall impose
penalties according to a graduated series of financial surcharges and operational sanctions, as
follows:
Audit Acceptance Agreement Page 4 of 7 May 23, 2008
Cascade Actions for Member Shortfall in Independent Supply Production
Financial Response
Frequency (applies to volume of shortfall) Operational Response
Peak Season Annual Shortfall
Shortfall
9 occurrence in None None Cascade notifies Member and
20 -year rolling Board adopts resolution
period declaring production failure
2nd occurrence in Surcharge equal Surcharge equal Cascade notifies Member and
20 -year rolling to 25% of to 5% of Board adopts resolution
period Cascade's Cascade's declaring 2 production failure,
average cost per average cost per imposing penalties, and
ccf delivered* ccf delivered* detailing consequences of
further failures
3' and subsequent Surcharge equal Surcharge equal Cascade notifies Member and
occurrences in 20- to 200% of to 80% of Board adopts resolution
year rolling period Cascade's Cascade's declaring 3` production failure,
average cost per average cost per imposing penalties, and
ccf delivered* ccf delivered* warning that a.fourth failure will
be deemed a Member
declaration of "loss of supply"
"average cost per ccf delivered" is defined as total annual Cascade Demand Share revenue divided
by total annual Cascade volume delivered.
Provided that only one occurrence of a shortfall in Independent Supply Production may
be declared per year, and provided further that in the event of multiple shortfalls in the same
year (e.g. both peak season and annual shortfalls), the financial penalty shall be the greater of
the calculated penalties.
6.3.5 A resolution declaring a permanent Loss of Supply shall be adopted by the Board
upon the 4 occurrence of a Failure to Meet Production Requirements in a 20 year rolling
period.
6.3.6 Whenever a resolution declaring a Loss of Supply has been adopted by the
Board, (a) the Member shall concur in the declaration of Loss of Supply and formally request an
additional Full Supply Commitment from Cascade in accordance with Section 5.2.2 of the
Interlocal; (b) Cascade shall, at the Member's expense, perform an audit according to the
approved audit methodology to quantify Cascade's additional Full Supply Commitment to the
Member; and (c) Cascade shall impose, by resolution of the Board, the applicable annual
financial penalties provided for in Section 6.3.4 of this agreement for that Loss of Supply, until
the Member submits to Cascade a formal request for an additional Full Supply Commitment
according to the Interlocal.
6.3.7 Whenever a Member experiences a Loss of Supply, that Loss of Supply shall be
documented in a resolution of the Board and copy provided to the Member. The resolution shall
Audit Acceptance Agreement Page 5 of 7 May 23, 2008
state the basis for the Board's declaration. A resolution declaring a Loss of Supply may be
rescinded upon a showing satisfactory to the Board of replacement of lost supply consistent with
the requirements of the Interlocal.
ARTICLE VII: General
Section 7.1 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement implements provisions of the
Interlocal and shall be construed and interpreted to that effect; otherwise, this document and all
attachments integrates all prior oral and written representations between the parties and is the
complete agreement between Cascade and Tukwila concerning the Audit of Tukwila's public
water system.
Section 7.2 Amendment. Except as otherwise provided, this Audit Agreement may
be amended only in writing and only if such writing is signed by the Member and by Cascade;
provided, however, an approved water system plan that modifies the Member's service area
shall amend the service area described in Section 2.1 pending a further Audit of the Member's
public water system in accordance with the Interlocal.
Section 7.3 Interpretation and Venue. This Audit Agreement shall be interpreted
and construed according to the laws of the State of Washington; provided that the Interlocal, the
Audit, and applicable Cascade resolutions may be consulted as aids to interpretation and
construction. Any action to enforce this Agreement shall be brought in King County,
Washington.
Section 7.4 Effective Date. This Audit Agreement shall be effective on the date that
it is approved by resolution of the Board.
CASCADE WATER ALLIANCE
By:
Date
Chair, Board of Directors
Attest:
Date
Secretary, Board of Directors
Audit Acceptance Agreement Page 6 of 7 May 23, 2008
MEMBER
By:
Date
Mayor or City Manager or President of Commissioners
Attest:
Date
Audit Acceptance Agreement Page 7 of 7 May 23, 2008
EXHIBIT A
MEMBER WATER AUDIT
CITY OF TUKWILA
PREPARED FOR CASCADE WATER ALLIANCE
May 23, 2008
Section I: Purpose Background
This water audit outlines the supply relationship between Cascade Water Alliance
(Cascade) and its Members, documenting each Member's official service area and
independent supply sources. As a condition for membership in Cascade, Members with
independent supply sources participated in a water system audit in 1999. The audit
included a review of Member -owned independent supplies, which resulted in an award
of independent supply credits for use against future Regional Capital Facilities Charge
(RCFC) payments. The prior audits were conducted on the premise that Cascade would
commence operation and supply delivery in 2000 however, Cascade did not begin
delivering water until 2004.
Cascade has recognized the need to update the prior audits for Members with
independent supply sources to establish Member obligations to produce water from
independent supplies, and to define RCFC credits (redeemable beginning in 2008). This
document has been prepared in accordance with Article V, Section 5.2.2 of the
Amended and Restated Cascade Interlocal Contract (dated December 15, 2004), which
authorizes Cascade to conduct audits of the independent supplies of its Members at any
time. Given that the City of Tukwila does not have any independent supply sources of
its own, the primary purpose of this audit is to document the supply relationship between
the City and Cascade.
Section II: Utility Description
The City of Tukwila is a municipal corporation that owns and operates a public water
system serving customers inside its water service area. Table 1 summarizes information
pertinent to the City's water system:
Table 1: General Water System Information City of Tukwila
Water System Name: City of Tukwila
Water System ID No: 89500F
Water System Classification: Group A Community Type
Type of Ownership: Local Government
Owner No:
Address: 600 Minkler Boulevard
System Contact Person: Operations Manager
CERU Count as of 12/31/04: 8,732
Sources of Information: Cascade City Records
Section 2.1 Service Area
The City of Tukwila is bounded by the City of Seatac on the west, the City of Seattle on
the north, the City of Renton on the east, and the City of Kent on the south. Tukwila's
current and future service area, city boundary, and other adjacent purveyor service
areas are shown on Figure 1.
The City purchases wholesale water from Cascade (currently Seattle water through the
Cascade Block) to serve its customers. In addition to this, the City holds agreements
with several non Members that allow it to acquire additional supply in the event of an
emergency.
2
Section 2.2 Pre Existing Service Commitments to Non Members
The City does not have any pre existing service commitments to non members.
Section 2.3 Distinguishing Characteristics Considerations
The following considerations are unique to the City of Tukwila's water system:
The City holds a surface water right, but that water right is used exclusively for
golf course irrigation and is not part of Tukwila's drinking water distribution
system. In addition, the City has a reclaimed water program for irrigation and
industrial uses. This program has value to Cascade, as it mitigates potable water
demand during peak periods.
Section 11I: Supply Commitment
Section 3.1 Delivery Points
The specific Points of Delivery are identified in Figure 1 (see page 2). The location of
each Point of Delivery is listed in Table 2 and is the Points of Delivery as defined by the
Member agency at the time the water audit was finalized.
TABLE 2
TABLE OF DELIVERY POINTS
HYDRAULIC
GRADIENT (Ft)
LOCATION JURISDICTION STA NO TYPE
Minimum Maximum
South Center
Parkway Tukwila
Parkway Tukwila 13 460 490 SUPPLY
Christensen Road
Baker Rd. Tukwila 15 460 490 SUPPLY
53rd Avenue S S
160th Street Tukwila 16 460 490 SUPPLY
E Marginal Way S
112th Street Tukwila 168 445 490 SUPPLY
51st Avenue S S
Leo Street Tukwila 169 455 490 SUPPLY
W Marginal Place
S 102nd Street Tukwila 170 300 490 SUPPLY
eJ�w19sz, City of Tukw
s y'. o a Utilities Committee
OP rsos
UTILI'T'IES COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
July 7, 2008 5:00 p.m. Conference Room #1
PRESENT
Councilmembers: Verna Griffm, Chair; Joan Hernandez, and Kathy Hougardy
Staff: Jim Morrow, Frank Iriarte, Mike Cusick, Bob Giberson, Ryan Larson, Gail Labanara and
Kimberly Matej
Guests: Chuck Parrish
CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Griffm called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS
No Presentations.
II. BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Cascade Water Alliance Member Audit and Audit Acceptance Agreement
Staff is seeking full Council approval to enter into a Member Water Audit Agreement with Cascade
Water Alliance (CWA).
As a member of Cascade Water Alliance, this audit agreement is required as part of our existing interlocal
agreement with CWA. Since the City of Tukwila does not have an independent water supply source of its
own, the main purpose of the audit agreement is to identify Tukwila's water delivery points which
document the supply relationship between the City and CWA.
i
r Staff clarified that in the original Committee agenda packet, two copies of the agreement were
inadvertently included. Additionally, page 3 and 4 of the agenda packet were inserted incorrectly. Those
pages are actually Exhibit A as referenced on page 6 of the packet, Section 1.3. All items will be inserted
in the correct order for the packet that goes to full Council.
Committee members have suggested providing the definition of wheeling in the informational memo
submitted to full Council. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JULY 14 COW FOR
DISCUSSION.
B. Utility Policy Issues
In a recent Council meeting, Mayor Haggerton (see Council minutes dated June 23, 2008) suggested
that policy should drive the budget; the budget should not be driving policy. He recommended that
Council outline their short term and long range policies. Based on these suggestions, staff has
identified a list of possible policies relative to utilities that could impact both the budget and Capital
Improvement Program.
After a lengthy discussion, Committee members identified three areas for further staff research and
analysis:
Enterprise Fund Budget Water, Sewer and Surface Water
o Establish reserve amounts for project contingencies and emergencies.
o Consider basing sewer rates on actual consumption.