HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2008-06-23 Item 4E - Grant Application - Boeing Access Road Bridge with Federal Highway Program COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
44 7-alip Initialr ITEM NO.
Q IVY Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor's review Council review I
9 t i z 06/23/08 1 3M--73r0 Ocr
1908
1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 08-078 ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: JUNE 23, 2008
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Boeing Access Road over BNRR Bridge Replacement Project
Federal Highway Bridge Program Grant Application
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date 06/23/08 Mtg Date 06/23/08 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date:
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PW7
SPONSOR'S The Boeing Access Road Bridge over the Burlington Northern and Union Pacific railroads
SUMMARY needs to be replaced in the near future and qualifies for grant funding. Grant applications for
the Federal Highway Bridge Program are due June 30, 2008. Committee approval is needed
for grant applications and full Council approval is required before accepting any grant. The
revised replacement costs for the bridge are now $31 million with the City match at
approximately $6.2 million.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F&S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 06/10/08
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Forward to full Council for discussion
COMivll1TEE More information needed; forward to COW.
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$0.00 $0.00
Fund Source: 104.01 Bridges (page 34, 2008 CIP)
Comments:
1 MTG. DATE 1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
06/23/08
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
06/23/08 Information Memo dated June 17, 2008 (revised after Transportation Committee)
Finance Information Memo dated June 18, 2008
Vicinity map
Bridge Inspection Report
Federal Highway Bridge Program Grant Application
Transportation Committee Meeting Minutes from June 10, 2008
INFORMATION MEMO
To: Mayor Haggerton
From: Public Works Director
Date: June 17, 2008
Subject: Boeine Access Road Bridte over BNRR Replacement Project
Project No. 94 -RWO8
Grant Application
ISSUE
Should the City apply for a Bridge replacement grant for the Boeing Access Road over BNRR
Bridge?
BACKGROUND
The Boeing Access Road Bridge was originally constructed in 1945. It has been inspected on a
regular basis in accordance with WSDOT standards. The bridge is currently classified as
"structurally deficient" and deteriorating. Since 1990, the City has performed repairs and
maintenance on the bridge that includes: two (2) separate bridge deck overlays, painting of the
structure, repair of a separating joint, and other minor repairs. In 2004 the substructure's rating
was downgraded due to concrete spalling, misaligned support beams/bearings, and exposed,
rusting rebar in several support columns.
The sufficiency rating dropped from 50.2 to 21.86 out of a possible score of 100 (see attached
inspection report), making it eligible for replacement or repair funding. At the current rate of
deterioration and without significant rehabilitation or replacement, it is anticipated that the bridge
would more than likely be posted with load restrictions within 5 to 7 years and possible closure
within 10 to 15 Y ears. What would this mean?
Boeing Access Road (see map), is an East -West principal arterial that crosses over I -5 just south
of Boeing Field. It is a regional transportation corridor that carries an average of 40,000 vehicles
per day to and from the manufacturing/industrial center on East Marginal Way as well as King
County International Airport. Trucks account for approximately 10% of the traffic using Boeing
Access Road. If a weight restriction were to go into effect, approximately 4,000 trucks a day
would have to find alternate routes.
ANALYSIS
The 2008 Capital Improvement Program, Page 34, has the replacement project in the "out years,"
beyond the 6 -year budgeting window. If the decision were made to accelerate the replacement,
What options are available?
Option Result
Do nothing The bridge will continue to deteriorate, weight restriction within 5 -7 years;
closure could happen within 10 -15 years.
P:\PROJECTS A- RW RS Projects\94RW08 BAR Br Repl\Grant Application TC 6-17 -08 Rev..doc
Options Continued Result
Rehabilitation Work would require repair /replacement of the substructure, deck, bridge rails,
and a seismic retrofit. Rehabilitation costs would approach full replacement
costs in order to meet all the current design standards and requirements.
Replacement Most cost effective alternative, would provide a structure for the next 50- years.
Replacement Project Costs
Phase Year 1 1 Year 2 1 Year 3 Year 4 Total 1
Design
Grant Funds 1,400,000 1 1,400,000 1 2,800,000 1
City Funds 350,000 350,000 700,000
Construction
Grant Funds $11,000,000 $11,000,000 $22,000,000
City Funds 1 1 2,750,000 2,750,000 5,500,000
Totals 1,750,000 1,750,000 1 $13,750,000 $13,750,000 $31,000,000
Project total is $31 million and includes: Design, Environmental, Right -of -Way, Construction,
Contingency, and Construction Management. CIP costs have been updated and escalated to
begin in late 2010.
The Federal Highway Bridge Program has placed a call for eligible bridge projects. This is the
first time in three years that the Bridge Program has had available funds. If a project receives
grant funding, a 20% local match is currently required (approximately $6.2 million in City
Funds). City bonding for $6 million would create an annual debt service of approximately
$480,000. The City could also apply for a Public Works Trust Fund Loan and depending upon
the City's contribution to the project, the PW "IF interest could be as low as 1
An analysis of bridges statewide indicates a significant number are eligible for replacement grant
funding. It is unknown how the condition of Tukwila's Boeing Access Road Bridge and its
importance as a regional transportation asset compares to the other bridges. However, it is
considered prudent for the City to submit a grant application in order to establish a position
within the funding queue and to bring attention to the seriousness of the bridge's condition. The
City may not be successful with this first submission, but at least we have begun the process of
replacing the bridge.
RECOMMENDATION
Council authorizes the submittal of a grant application for the Boeing Access Road over BNRR
Bridge.
Exhibits: Vicinity Map
Inspection Report
Project Application
P:\PROTECTS\A- RW RS Projects\94RW08 BAR Br RepRGrant Application TC 6-17 -08 Rev..doc
4 ‘sy City o Tukwila
,f 0 y �y 10 f 6200 Southcenter Boulevard A Tukwila, Washington 98188
V .5).. 5).. jag
r
908
MEMORANDUM
To: Jim Morrow, Public Works Director
From: Robert F. Noland, Interim Finance Director /1
Date: June 18, 2008
Subject: Grant Application Boeing Access Road Bridge Replacement
You asked for my comments regarding required City matching funds associated with a potential
grant. The grant application is for the replacement of the Boeing Access Road Bridge. Your
memo of June 17 details the scope of the project and the required 20% City match of
approximately $6 million.
It has been my experience that, when an opportunity arises to receive a grant of this magnitude, it
is incumbent on us to modify our priorities accordingly and find a way to meet the matching
requirements. As noted in your memo, either limited tax G.O. bonds or a Public Works Trust
Fund loan would be viable options.
Please let me know if I can provide any additional information regarding this proposal.
RFN
3
a
3
a
f' 1
27- a
a
.s per"'
g
aaa aaaa= as aa_ n. s3 XAF.1.a t1a twt
(C
I t
0 kS\
eV
h
fl:/15,
q 7
52-
1-
S
a
a
a
a
a h
57;2( ?7 ,0
o��a Project
s
4 r
G Location
St
102
s„,,
i S
`°s tr /Q� S Ip
04 St .i St Ti9 HA ^HM.04 3% :EN ki .22:22.i -22 2 1 2 II i9- 93:95:22 a B:C E.
s VI
c° C. S I Ft 1
c o cess Rd S
2> B
I
6 8
'N P
S108St` --.....j 'ainier \7014:),v)
ro
iolf r" 3
.ountr i l J
:lub Y 111 P1 2 St S
tz-----(/ S 113 St
AI
a� LA Boeing Access Road
Tukwila Bridge Replacement
a C2t2 of
i 'l z Vicinity
o� June 11, 2008 Map
s 1908
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
BATS I 0 1 2 I Status: Complete Ver Date 11 20 2006 9 y
A enc TUKWILA
Bridge No. 0000TUK12 Page 1 of 6 Structure Type
Bridge Name BOEING ACCESS RD Route 90705 Intersecting BNRR AND UPRR
Structure ID 08002500 MilePost 1.97 Location NW JCT 1 -5
I Inspection Date: 12/16/2006
Irfector'sSi nature JP IDent# G0117 n Si nature DEO
g P� it BATS Hours: 7.00
4 Structural Adqcy (657) 1945 Inspections Performed:
N Pier/Abut/Protect (679) Year Built IT OF NF Date Report Type
2 Deck Geometry (658) N Scour (680) 1966 Year Rebuilt Y 24 12/16/06 Routine
9 Underclearance (659) 8 Approach Rdwy (681)
Level (660) F 35 Operating Rating Fracture Critical
5 Operating 9 9 Retaining Walls (682)
F 21 Inventory Rating Underwater
8 Alignment Adqcy (661) 9 Pier Protection (683)
9 Waterway Adqcy (662) 0 Bridge Rails (884 A Open Close Posted Special
5 6 Deck Overall (663) 0 Transition (685) 99 99" Vertical Over Deck Y 12 12/16/06 Interim
5 Drains Condition (664) 1 Guardrails (686) 23' 10" Vertical Under Equipment
6 Superstructure (671) 1 Terminals (687) R Vertical Under Code
Damage
0 Number Utilities (675) N Revise Rating (688) 0.00 1.50 Asphalt Depth Safety
Short Span
4 Substructure (676) D Photos Flag (691) 35 Speed Limit
9 Chan/Protection (677) Soundings Flag (693)
9 Culvert (678) Measure Clearance(694) Suff Rating: 21.86SD I 22.86 SDI
v BM ST00fneri
I Element I Element Description Total I Units Env State) I State State3 State4
12IConcrete Deck 24,264 SF 3 24,251 6 7 0
90ISteel Rolled Girder 2,736 LF I 3 2,436 300 0 0
110IConcrete Girder 1,344 LF I 3 1,337 5 2 0
205IConcrete Pile /Column 24 EA 3 12 9 3 0
210'Concrete Pier Wall 162 LF 3 160 2 0 0:
215 Concrete Abutment 81 LF 3 81 0 0 01
234 Concrete Pier Cap Crossbeam 138 LF 3 118 0 10 10
266IConcrete Sidewalk Supports 2,191 SF 3 2,182 0 9 0
311 (Moveable Bearing (roller, sliding, etc) 48 EA 3 21 18 9 0
313 'Fixed Bearing 12 EA 3 6 6 0 0
321 (Concrete Approach Slab 1 EA 3 1 0 0 0
330IMetal Bridge Railing 457 LF 3 427 0 30 0
331 Concrete Bridge Railing 674 LF 3 424 250 0 0
408ISteel Sliding Plate 144 LF 3 141 3 0 0
800 'Asphaltic Concrete (AC) Overlay 6,066 SF 3 6,066 0 0 0
802 !Thin Polymer Overlay <1 in.) 1 18,321 SF 3 18,308 6 7 0
901 )Red Lead Alkyd Paint System 1 21,888 SF 3 21,705 171 12 0
0 Bridge is oriented from west to east.
For the purpose of this report the lanes are designated from the right in the direction of traffic.
An approach slab spans between the roadway and back of pavement seat at the west abutment. See element 321.
SW bridge delineator post is broken and leaning against concrete bridge rail. See photo #31. REPAIR 13337.
Spans 1 and 2 have concrete girders, and Spans 3 through 5 have steel rolled girders. See attached File #1 for Bridge Layout.
Below Spans 3 through 5 are BNSF railroad tracks.
Track layout: Span 3 (gravel road and one railroad track); Span 4 (five railroad tracks); Span 5 (one railroad track)
Tracks are controlled by BNSF with an agreement to provide railroad flagging for Union Pacific trains.
12 Top of deck: Westbound lane 1 is a widened section of bridge and is covered with ACP. See element 800.
Westbound lanes 2 and 3 and eastbound lanes 1 to 3 are covered with a thin epoxy overlay. See element 802.
At Pier 3, bridge centerline, the raised curb has a broken section 5 ft. long with 18° exposed longitudinal rebar. See photo #42.
REPAIR 13339.
Printed On 1/8/2007
Federal Highway Please send copies of the latest inventory and inspection
reports, load ratings summary, accident data, any other
Bridge Program pertinent information, and electronic photos (640 x 480
pixels minumum .jpg) with this questionnaire by the due date
Project Application specified in the cover letter.
Agency Name: City of Tukwila 'Pick one of the following:
Bridge Name: Boeing Access Road °Replacement Candidate
Bridge Number: 000 0TUK12 0 Rehabilitation Candidate
Contact Person: Robin Tischmak 0 Preventative Maintenance
Phone: 206) 431-2455
Sufficiency Rating: 21.86 SD I Scour Mitigation Electrical Mechanical
Seismic Retrofit Bridge Strengthening
Structure ID: 08002500 I Deck Repair Painting
Brief Project Description (including bridge replacement type)
Rep] arP t Ping r.rPaa_?cac3 hri daP over rai 1 roacIR (hnt:h
=RR TTPRR) w t-h a rxrPPt conr.ret-P csi rdPr hri daP
Proposed Length: 364 Width (Curb to Curb) 88
Rehabilitation Replacement /Preventative Maintenance Projects
PE Costs (approx 25% of total) $3,500,000
(Soils, Environmental, Design Documents, Plans Preparation, etc.)
Right of Way Costs
(Purchases, Relocation and Construction Easement)
Construction Costs $17,800,000
(Environmental mitigation, approach costs (15 structure costs, etc.)
Construction Engineering (18 $3,204,000
Contingency (15 $2,670,000
Mobilization (10 $1,780,000
Inflation Factor 5% per year, based on projected Ad date below) $1,780,000
Total Rehabilitation /Replacement/Preventative Maintenance Project Costs:*
$30,734,000
If a Rehabilitation, what would be the Replacement cost for that same structure
(including PE, Right of Way, and Construction)?
Realistic Start Dates (Month, Year):
Preliminary Engineering (Right of Way Purchases 1 Construction 1
Apr 2010 Jan 2011 Apr 2012
Proiected Advertising Date (Year): 2012
Project cost estimates may be updated on this form until October 31, 2008.
Provide comments below
SOS -5
City of Tukwila
o
.G a--I
y;a Transportation Committee
rsoa
TRANSPORTATION CO1VIiVIITTEE
Meeting Minutes
June 10, 2008 5:00 p.m. Conference Room #1
PRESENT
Councilmembers: Pam Linder, Chair; Dennis Robertson and De'Sean Quinn
Staff: Jim Morrow, Frank Iriarte, Robin Tischmak, Bob Giberson, Gail Labanara, Moira Bradshaw,
and Kimberly Matej
CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Linder called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m.
I. PRESENTATIONS
No presentations.
IL BUSINESS AGENDA
A. Boeing Access Road Bridge Grant Annlication
Staff is requesting approval from the Transportation Committee to submit a grant application to the Federal
Highway Bridge Program for partial funding to replace the Boeing Access Road Bridge. There is a required
20% local match for funded projects. The grant application is due June 30.
This is the first time in approximately three years that new grant funding has been available for bridges
through this program. Submitting an application will allow the City to gauge our competitive rank status as
well as identify our need for bridge replacement with the Federal Highway Bridge Program.
V\...)?r) Committee members expressed concern regarding the budget constraints of identifying local match funds
which are approximated at $4 million if the grant is successful. As a result of a detailed discussion, the
Committee determined that this request should be forwarded to full Council for discussion. Committee
members believe that the number of considerations for this project as well as the respective policy level
decisions that may need to be made make this a most prudent discussion and decisions for the Council.
Additionally, the Committee has requested detailed information regarding the bridge replacement project
being discussed, including but not limited to: identified problem statement, historical bridge information,
critical rank for bridge use and repair, regional importance, funding options and priority among other City
projects. This information is crucial in order for full Council to discuss this request and reach a decision.
Committee would also like to see a memo from Interim Finance Director, Bob Noland, stating his financial
opinion on this matter.
In closing, Committee Chair Linder stated that she would like to meet with Jim Morrow next week to review
the information being forwarded to full Council. FORWARD TO JUNE 23 COW FOR DISCUSSION.
B. Review of Draft Walk Roll Plan (continued from Mav 28 Transportation Committee)
Staff and Committee members continued conducting a broad review of the draft Walk Roll Plan from the
May 28 Transportation Committee meeting. In addition to making some smaller scale suggestions, the
Committee recommends the following significant modifications:
1. Addition of a seventh Recommended Action (see pages 8 -9 of the draft document) creating a
dedicated CIP fund for the Walk Roll Plan.
2. Research alternative presentation options for maps included in that Plan that will be easier to view
and interpret.