HomeMy WebLinkAboutTrans 2013-11-26 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila
Transportation Committee
Kate Kruller, Chair
• Joe Duffie
• Dennis Robertson
Distribution:
K. Kruller
J. Duffle
K. Hougardy
D. Robertson
Mayor Haggerton
D. Cline
K. Matej
L. Humphrey
B. Giberson
F. I riarte
R. Tischmak
G. Labanara
P. Brodin
S. Kerslake
Clerk File Copy
2 Extra
e -mail pkt pdf to A. Le
e -mail cover to: C.
O'Flaherty, D. Almberg,
B. Saxton, S. Norris,
M. Hart, A. Le
AGENDA
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2013
Time: 5:15 PM Place: Conference Room #1 (6300 Building)
Item
Recommended Action
Page
1. PRESENTATION(S)
2. BUSINESS AGENDA
a) Showalter Middle School Traffic Management Issues
a) Information only
Pg. 1
b) Bridge Program Grant Applications
b) Committee Approval
Pg. 5
c) Beacon Ave South Bridge Load Limit Signs
c) Information only
Pg. 7
d) TUC Transit Center /APW Street & Water
d) Forward to 12/02/13 Regular
Pg. 13
Construction Management Contract AECOM &
Consent Agenda
Supplement No. 21 with IBI Group
e) TUC Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge
e) Forward to 12/09/13 C.O.W
Pg. 59
Supplement No. 10 with KPFF
and Special
f) Street Vacation of 41St Ave S
f) Forward to 12/09/13 C.O.W
Pg. 99
Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Date
and Special
g) Growing Transit Communities
g) Forward to 2014 C.O.W
Pg. 105
Resolution Approving Compact
3. SCATBd
h) SCATBd 10/15/13 Meeting Summary
h) Information Only
Pg. 121
SCATBd Draft Operating Procedures
SCATBd Draft Letter to Ron Pate, Rail Director
SCATBd 11/19/13 Meeting Agenda
4. MISCELLANEOUS
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS
Future Agendas:
Next Scheduled Meeting: To be determined per 2014 Committee Calendar
The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
Please contact the Public Works Department at 206 - 433 -0179 for assistance.
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
DATE: November 22, 2013
SUBJECT: Showalter Middle School
Traffic Management Issues
ISSUE
Discuss options for improving traffic flow in and around Showalter Middle School.
ANALYSIS
City of Tukwila and Tukwila School District staff has met to discuss changes to drop -off
traffic signage and markings for Showalter Middle School. Changes for drop -off traffic
include improving signage on 46th Ave S to clearly indicate no drop -offs (which will match the
current signage on S 144th St). Signage and markings will be changed on Showalter school
property over the school district's winter break and Public Works will then install the
additional signage on 46th Ave S. Spot enforcement of drop -offs and pick -ups in the right -of-
way will be coordinated with the Police Department beginning in early January 2014.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The initial cost to Tukwila for the new signage on 46th Ave S is estimated to be $500.
Additional Police enforcement will be accomplished with existing forces. The long -term goal
is to upgrade the crosswalk at S 144th St and 46th Ave S to include a "Rectangular Rapid
Flash Beacon" enhanced crosswalk, which could cost from $20,000 to $40,000. City staff will
pursue grant funding for the enhanced crosswalk as grant opportunities arise.
RECOMMENDATION
For discussion only.
Attachment: Federal Highway Administration Brochure on Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons
W: \PW Eng \OTHER\Tukwila School District \Info Memo Showalter MS Traffic Issues.docx
1
1
US.Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
This summary is one in a series
describing Innovative Intersection:
Safety Treatments. Thie summaries..;
identify new technologies and
techniques to improve intersection
Report 50 0,Volumes5and 12,
were published irj 2003 and 2004,
respectively. These treatments
show promise for improving safet
but comprehensive effectiveness
evaluationsare not yet available:
Safe Roads fora Safer future
Inuestment'in roadway safety saves Hues
Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacon
(RRFB)
Purpose
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, there were a total of
14,340 pedestrian fatalities and 193,000 pedestrian injuries resulting from pedestrian -
vehicle crashes nationwide during the 2004 -2006 period. Rectangular Rapid Flash
Beacons (RRFB) can enhance safety by reducing crashes between vehicles and
pedestrians at unsignalized intersections and mid -block pedestrian crossings by
increasing driver awareness of potential pedestrian conflicts.
Alternative Names
Light Emitting Diode (LED) Rapid -Flash System, Stutter Flash or LED Beacons.
Operation
RRFBs are user - actuated amber LEDs that supplement warning signs at unsignalized
intersections or mid -block crosswalks. They can be activated by pedestrians manually by
a push button or passively by a pedestrian detection system.
RRFBs use an irregular flash pattern that is similar to emergency flashers on police vehicles.
RRFBs may be installed on either two -lane or multi -lane roadways.
Potential Benefits
RRFBs are a lower cost alternative to traffic signals and hybrid signals that are shown to
increase driver yielding behavior at crosswalks significantly when supplementing standard
pedestrian crossing warning signs and markings.
An official FHWA- sponsored experimental implementation and evaluation conducted in
St. Petersburg, Florida found that RRFBs at pedestrian crosswalks are dramatically more
effective at increasing driver yielding rates to pedestrians than traditional overhead beacons.
The novelty and unique nature of the stutter flash may elicit a greater response from drivers
than traditional methods.
The addition of RRFB may also increase the safety effectiveness of other treatments, such as
the use of advance yield markings with YIELD (or STOP) HERE FOR PEDESTRIANS signs. These
signs and markings are used to reduce the incidence of multiple- threat crashes at crosswalks
on multi -lane roads (i.e., crashes where a vehicle in one lane stops to allow a pedestrian to
cross the street while a vehicle in an adjacent lane, traveling in the same direction, strikes the
pedestrian), but alone they only have a small effect on overall driver yielding rates.
May 2009
FH WA -SA -09 -009
2
Figure 1: Activated,solarpowered RRFB on
a center island at an unsignalized intersection
beacons flash using an irregular flash pattern that
is sirnilarto emergenr y flashers on police vehicles
Figure 2: Activated, solarpowered, roadside RRFB'.
at a mid-block crosswalk
Figure 3: Combined roadside and median system
of solar powered RRFB
Learn More
Michael Frederick, st. Petersburg Pdeicjhborhood
Transportation r \ %ra rages
727.893.7843
michael.frederick @stpete.org
Ed Rice, Intersection Safety Team Leader
FH!" A Office of Safety
202.366.9064
ed.rice @dot.gov
See Also:
http: / /mutcd.fhwa.dotgov /resources/
interim_approvalhall/stpetersburgrpt/intro.htm
http : / /www.stpete.org /pdf /ite_paper 07.pdf
Agency Experience
"An Analysis of the Effects of Stutter Flash LED Beacons to Increase Yielding to Pedestrians
Using Multilane Crosswalks," along with "The Use of Stutter Hash LED Beacons to Increase
Yielding to Pedestrians at Crosswalks' presented at the Transportation Research Board
Annual Meeting in 2008, summarized the results of two studies on the effects of RRFBs
when used to supplement standard pedestrian crossing warning signs at crosswalks'.
The former found that going from a no- beacon arrangement to a two - beacon system,
mounted on the supplementary warning sign on the right side of the crossing, increased
yielding from 18 percent to 81 percent. There was a further increase in yielding behavior,
with a four - beacon system (with two beacons on both the right and left side of the
crossing) to 88 percent. "An Analysis of the Effects of Stutter Flash LED Beacons to Increase
Yielding to Pedestrians Using Multilane Crosswalks" also evaluated the sites over a 1 -year
period, and found that there was little to no decrease in yielding behavior over time.
Implementation Considerations
Including RRFBs on the roadside increases driver yielding behavior significantly. Including RRFBs
on a center island or median as well can further increase driver yielding behavior, although with
a lower marginal benefit than roadside beacons.
RRFBs can use manual push- buttons or automated passive (e.g., video or infrared) pedestrian
detection, and should be unlit when not activated.
RRFBs typically receive power by standalone solar panel units, but may also be wired to a
traditional power source.
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) Specifications
The MUTCD gave interim approval to RRFBs for optional use in limited circumstances in July
2008. The interim approval allows for usage as a warning beacon to supplement standard
pedestrian crossing warning signs and markings at either a pedestrian or school crossing; where
the crosswalk approach is not controlled by a yield sign, stop sign, or traffic - control signal; or at
a crosswalk at a roundabout.
The MUTCD interim approval memo also contains other provisions for the implementation of
the device and should be reviewed (http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/resources/interim_approval/ia7 1/
fhwamemo.htm).
Costs
Cost is approximately $10,000 to $15,000 for purchase and installation of two units (one on
either side of a street). This includes solar panels for powering the units, pad lighting, indication
units (for both sides of street) with RRFBs in the back and front of each unit, signage on
both approaches, all posts, and either passive infrared detection or push buttons with audio
instructions.
Costs would be proportionately higher for additional units placed on a median island, etc.
Bi Srutt
hweabolt 'i'Ced 'rhricia. e Morn r eocn,a,? one
C/d e:
eahutt .: Hon tea, and S!. er A,1 .1r; �... of the _`rtt.O f Stuttcr rah /ID b'eacons 0! fl ea Y14(1,77(,/ r PEfts.r. s ti.:.ig
.'u t rrra rr. ,,1., ks.'P.: :ceder the Troosportatfoo qi.okoorch .'s,r,rd Doi °, _ernrj, Wo5tif ogtoo, DC, 2008.
Von `?; -ute fi RSi! ad E ,IGrmr r "The iit_afttart_rtr 80 /3eaconso)/oue(Ee YicloO'ng to :peciestrions ,
the km5portation .Rase? 1r 5Q5rd Annual r� kV ::irrat r, t'. 2008.
3
4
TO:
FROM:
BY:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
Grant Griffin, Senior Program Manager
November 22, 2013
Boeing Access Road over BNRR Bridge Rehabilitation
Project No. 99410408
Grant Applications for Local Agency Bridge Program
ISSUE
Authorize the submittal of funding applications for federal bridge funds through the Local Agency Bridge
Program commonly known as Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee (BRAC) Funding.
BACKGROUND
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is scheduled to make a Call for Projects for the
Local Agency Bridge Program in late November 2013. A number of City bridge projects have been identified for
potential grant funding and are listed below. Current City policy requires approval by the appropriate committee
before applying for grants.
DISCUSSION
The Local Agency Bridge Program consists of the following sub - programs:
• Replacement • Seismic Retrofit • Paint for Steel Bridges
• Rehabilitation • Scour Repairs • Deck and Joint Repairs
The Boeing Access Road over BNRR Bridge was funded for rehabilitation in 2012 and is currently in design. It
has been recognized that the nearby Airport Way Bridge is also a good candidate for rehabilitation funds and
the project estimates show that significant savings could be realized if the two bridges were rehabilitated at the
same time. The City would like to submit a BRAC grant application for the Airport Way Bridge and request an
early decision from WSDOT in order to obtain rehabilitation funds and construct the projects concurrently. If
successful for the Airport Way Bridge, only the Design Phase local match of $40,277.00 would be immediately
necessary and funds are available in the 2014 Annual Bridge Inspection and Repairs Project.
Airport Way Bridge Project Estimates:
Rehabilitation Federal Funds (80 %) Tukwila Match (20 %)
$1,633,000.00 $1,306,400.00 $326,600.00
Other BRAC grant funding applications include:
Seismic Program
• Grady Way Bridge
• Frank Zepp (S180th St)
Paint Program
• Beacon Avenue S Bridge
• Frank Zepp (S180th St)
Deck and Joint Program
• Frank Zepp (S180th St)
The Seismic Retrofit, Paint for Steel Bridges, Scour Repairs, and Deck and Joint Repairs Programs have
historically been funded at 100% with no City local match required.
RECOMMENDATION
Committee approval to submit BRAC grant applications for the four bridges listed above.
w: \pw eng \projects \a - rw & rs projects \hoeing access rd bridge rehab (99410408) \pe \airport way bridge funding \info memo brac grant applications 2013.docx
5
6
TO:
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director'
By: Grant Griffin, Senior Program Manager
DATE: November 22, 2013
SUBJECT: 2013 Annual Bridge Inspections and Repairs
Project No. 91310402
Bridge Load Rating Review and Update
Posting Load Limits on Beacon Ave S Bridge
ISSUE
Load Posting the Beacon Ave S Bridge in accordance with the National Bridge Inspection
Standards (NBIS), 23 CFR 650C.
BACKGROUND
Review of the official bridge files for City of Tukwila owned bridges in the summer of 2013
revealed several deficiencies with respect to bridge Toad ratings. As a result, a contract with
Sargent Engineers was executed for a Load Rating Review and Update on July 31, 2013 as
part of the 2013 Annual Bridge Inspections and Repairs Program.
DISCUSSION
Sargent Engineers provided an analysis of several existing bridge load ratings and updated
these documents using current load rating standards. The result of applying these current
standards resulted in a calculated capacity reduction and the need to post load limiting
warning signs on the Beacon Ave S Bridge. The load limit posting for the Beacon Ave S
Bridge will state "One Truck At A Time On Bridge ". It would be uncommon for more than one
truck to be on the bridge at one time as Beacon Ave S is a residential street. This change will
cause the least service impact for bridge users.
FISCAL IMPACT
The new signs for the Beacon Ave S Bridge should cost less than $500.
RECOMMENDATION
Information only.
Attachments: Load Rating Summary Sheet
Sign Choice Email from Sargent Engineers
WSDOT Standard Sign
W:iP W Eng1PROJECTS'A- RW & RS Projects \Bridge Inspection Programs \Bridge Inspections 2013 (91310402y Sargent Load Rating,Info Memo Beacon Ave Posting.docs
7
Bridge Name:
Bridge Number: Tuk 11 - 08001800
Span Types:
Bridge Length: 182
Design Load:
Rated By:
Checked By: JSS
Date:
Bridge Rating Summary
Boeing Access Road Bridge (Airport Way)
4 Span RC Girder
H 20
MJS
Sept. 2013
Inspection Report Date
4118/2013
Substructure Condition
6
Rating Method
LFR
Deck Condition
6
Overlay Thickness
3"
Superstructure Condition
6
Truck
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
NRL
OL-1
OL-2
RF (INV)
1.08
1.11
1.16
0.00
0.62
0.51
RF (OPR)
1.81
1.85
1.94
0.00
1.03
0.85
Controlling Point
Shear in girder
Shear in girder
Shear in girder
Shear in girder
Shear in girder
Shear in girder
NBI Rating RF Tons Controlling Point
Inventory (HS-20) 0.79 29 Shear in girder
Operating (HS-20) 1.33 48 Shear in girder
Remarks:
This updates the previous rating. Ratings were not performed on NRL vehicles.
8
Trucks
NRL
Single-Unit 4
Single-Unit 5
Single-Unit 6
Single-Unit 7
Bridge Rating Summary
(Single-unit Trucks)
RF (INV) RF (OPR) Controlling Point
0.00 0 If the NRL is less than 1 for operating, the below
trucks shall be evaiu ted
0.00 0.00 Shear in girder
0.00 0.00 Shear in girder
0.00 0.00 Shear in girder
0.00 0.00 Shear in girder
WSBIS Coding Recommendations:
Design Load (WB75-50) 4
Operating Rating:
Type (WB75-51)
Tons (WB75-52)
Inventory Rating:
Type (WB75-54)
Tons (WB75-55)
F
48
F
29
Operating Level (WB76-60) 5
Recommended Posting:
There is no recommended posting at this time.
9
Grant Griffin
From: Monte Smith <montes @sargentengineers.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 11:14 AM
To: Grant Griffin
Subject: Beacon Avenue Bridge
All elements of the bridge have rating factors above one except for the girders. If we restrict the bridge to one
lane then the number of wheel lines going to one girder is 1.60. The bridge was rated with two lanes with 2.59
wheel lines going to the girders. So if we restrict the bridge to one lane the ratings increase by 2.59/1.60 =
1.62. This will raise all of the ratings to above legal loads.
Monte Smith
Sargent Engineers, Inc.
320 Ronlee Lane NW
Olympia, WA 98501
(360) 867 -9284
Fax (360) 867 -9318
ww sargente i_0i
1
10
R12 -1101
11/97
C
4,
G
B
ONE TRUCKI
AT ATIMEI
ON BODGE
A
DIMENSIONS (MILLIMETERS)
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
900
900
16
22
125C
78
56
DIMENSIONS (INCHES)
A
B
CD
E
F
G
36
36
5/8
7/8
5C
3 1/8
2 1/4
COLORS
LEGEND - BLACK (NON -REFL)
BACKGROUND - WHITE (REFL)
E
F
E
F
E
11
12
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director/
BY: Peter Lau, Senior Program Manager
DATE: November 22, 2013
SUBJECT: TUC Transit Center Project; Andover Park West Street and Water Projects
Project Numbers 90610402, 98810404 and 99840105
1) Construction Management Contract with AECOM Technical Services, and
2) Supplemental Agreement No. 21 to Contract No. 06 -019 with IBI Group
ISSUE
Approve Construction Management (CM) contract with AECOM Technical Services and Supplemental
Agreement No. 21 to Contract No. 06 -019 with IBI Group for the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Transit Center;
Andover Park West Street and Water Improvement Projects (Transit Center Project).
BACKGROUND
The Transit Center Project is scheduled for construction in early 2014 as the bid was awarded by Council on
November 18, 2013 for $6,037,510. While in -house City staff will provide lead CM for the project, a significant
amount of additional CM resources is required to supplement the in -house capabilities. The City solicited for
consulting services and received eight CM proposals. The top three firms were then interviewed and included;
AECOM, URS and WHPacific. AECOM was rated the highest by the cumulative scores of the selection panel.
Along with AECOM's CM support, a new Supplemental Agreement is also needed from IBI Group, the design
consultant, to provide design support during the construction phase.
DISCUSSION
The AECOM contract will include field engineering and inspection documentation compliance support, as well
as on -call specialty sub - consultants. The fee of $739,350.06 is reasonable for the scope of work provided by
AECOM for this complex project. For the IBI Group, Supplemental Agreement No. 21 for $80,000.00 will supply
on -call engineering support. The construction management budget is $1,022,460.00.
CM Expenses Budget
AECOM Contract CM & Inspection $739,350.06 $1,022,460.00
IBI Sup No. 21 - Construction Eng Support 80,000.00
City CM Staff, WSDOT & Misc. Expenses 200,000.00
Total Contract and Budget $1.019.350.06 $1,,022.460.00
RECOMMENDATION
Council is being asked to approve the Construction Management contract with AECOM in the amount of
$739,350.06 and Supplemental Agreement No. 21 to Contract No. 06 -019 with IBI Group in the amount of
$80,000.00 and consider these items on the Consent Agenda at the December 2, 2013 Regular Meeting.
Attachments: CM Consultant Selection Scoring Sheet
CM Consultant Contract with AECOM
IBI Group Supplemental Agreement No. 21 to Contract No. 06 -019
W:IPW EngIPROJECTSIA- RW & RS Projects\Transit Center (90610402)1Construction - City use only\CM Consultant Selectionllnfo Memo for AECOM CM & IBI CM support, 11 -19 -13 gl.doc
13
Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Project; Andover Park West Street and Water Improvement Projects
Rankings
Cyndy (Proposal)
Cyndy (Interview)
Mike (Proposal)
Mike (Interview)
Peter (Proposal)
Peter (Interview)
Final Ranking
Translated Final Ranking
40%
60%
40%
60%
40%
60%
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.6
1.2
1.2
0.8
1.8
1.2
1.2
0.4
1.8
1.2
1.2
0.4
1.2
0.8
0.6
NOTE: The lowest ranking is the highest qualified.
Local Agency
Standard Consultant
Agreement
Consultant/Address /Telephone
AECOM Technical Services
710 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1000
Seattle, WA 98004
206.624.9349
@ Architectural /Engineering Agreement
❑ Personal Services Agreement
Agreement Number
Project Title And Work Description
Tukwila Urban Transit Center, Construction
Management Services
Federal Aid Number
FTA Grant No. WA040081
Agreement Type (Choose one)
❑ Lump Sum
Lump Sum Amount $
°'°' ° ° ° ° ° °`°
%
%
@ Cost Plus Fixed Fee
Overhead Progress Payment Rate
Overhead Cost Method '
❑ Actual Cost
DBE Participation
• Yes 0 No
Federal ID Number or Social Security Number
95- 2661922
• Actual Cost Not To Exceed
❑ Fixed Overhead Rate
Fixed Fee $ 81,328.27
❑ Specific Rates Of Pay
Do you require a 1099 for IRS?
Completion Date
March 1, 2015
CI Yes • No
Total Amount Authorized $ 739,350.06
Management Reserve Fund $
Maximum Amount Payable $ 739,
Y 739,350.06
• Negotiated Hourly Rate
• Provisional Hourly Rate
❑ Cost Per Unit of Work
Index of Exhibits (Check all that apply):
® Exhibit A -1 Scope of Work
❑ Exhibit A -2 Task Order Agreement
❑ Exhibit B -1 DBE Utilization Certification
Exhibit C Electronic Exchange of Data
❑ Exhibit D -1 Payment - Lump Sum
® Exhibit D -2 Payment - Cost Plus
❑ Exhibit D -3 Payment - Hourly Rate
❑ Exhibit D -4 Payment - Provisional
❑ Exhibit E -1 Fee - Lump/Fixed/Unit
❑ Exhibit E -2 Fee - Specific Rates
Exhibit F Overhead Cost
❑ Exhibit G Subcontracted Work
❑ Exhibit G -1 Subconsultant Fee
❑ Exhibit G -2 Fee -Sub Specific Rates
❑ Exhibit G -3 Sub Overhead Cost
® Exhibit H Title VI Assurances
® Exhibit I Payment Upon Termination of Agreement
® Exhibit J Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedures
® Exhibit K Consultant Claim Procedures
❑ Exhibit L Liability Insurance Increase
® Exhibit M-la Consultant Certification
® Exhibit M -lb Agency Official Certification
® Exhibit M -2 Certification - Primary
® Exhibit M -3 Lobbying Certification
® Exhibit M -4 Pricing Data Certification
❑ App. 31.910 Supplemental Signature Page
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 2013 ,
between the Local Agency of City of Tukwila , Washington, hereinafter called the "AGENCY" ,
and the above organization hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT ".
DOT Form 140 -089 EF
Revised 09/2013
Page 1 of 8
15
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the AGENCY desires to accomplish the above referenced project, and
WHEREAS, the AGENCY does not have sufficient staff to meet the required commitment and therefore deems it
advisable and desirable to engage the assistance of a CONSULTANT to provide the necessary services for the PROJECT;
and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that he /she is in compliance with the Washington State Statutes relating to
professional registration, if applicable, and has signified a willingness to furnish Consulting services to the AGENCY,
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms, conditions, covenants and performance contained herein, or attached
and incorporated and made a part hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows:
I General Description of Work
The work under this AGREEMENT shall consist of the above described work and services as herein defined and
necessary to accomplish the completed work for this PROJECT. The CONSULTANT shall furnish all services, labor, and
related equipment necessary to conduct and complete the work as designated elsewhere in this AGREEMENT.
II Scope of Work
The Scope of Work and projected level of effort required for this PROJECT is detailed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT.
III General Requirements
All aspects of coordination of the work of this AGREEMENT with outside agencies, groups, or individuals shall receive
advance approval by the AGENCY. Necessary contacts and meetings with agencies, groups, and /or individuals shall be
coordinated through the AGENCY. The CONSULTANT shall attend coordination, progress and presentation meetings
with the AGENCY and /or such Federal, State, Community, City or County officials, groups or individuals as may be
requested by the AGENCY. The AGENCY will provide the CONSULTANT sufficient notice prior to meetings requiring
CONSULTANT participation. The minimum required hours or days notice shall be agreed to between the AGENCY and
the CONSULTANT and shown in Exhibit "A."
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a monthly progress report, in a form approved by the AGENCY, which will outline in
written and graphical form the various phases and the order of performance of the work in sufficient detail so that the
progress of the work can easily be evaluated.
The CONSULTANT, and each SUBCONSULTANT, shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or
sex in the performance of this contract. The CONSULTANT, and each SUBCONSULTANT, shall carry out applicable
requirements of 49 CFR Part 26 in the award and administration of USDOT- assisted contracts. Failure by the
CONSULTANT to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this AGREEMENT that may result in the
termination of this AGREEMENT.
Participation for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE), if required, per 49 CFR Part 26, or participation of Minority
Business Enterprises (MBE), and Women Business Enterprises (WBE), shall be shown on the heading of this
AGREEMENT. If D/M/WBE firms are utilized, the amounts authorized to each firm and their certification number will be
shown on Exhibit `B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT. If the Prime
CONSULTANT is a DBE firm they must comply with the Commercial Useful Function (CUF) regulation outlined in the
AGENCY'S "DBE Program Participation Plan ". The mandatory DBE participation goals of the AGREEMENT are those
established by the WSDOT'S Highway and Local Programs Project Development Engineer in consultation with the
AGENCY.
All Reports, PS &E materials, and other data furnished to the CONSULTANT by the AGENCY shall be returned. All
electronic files, prepared by the CONSULTANT, must meet the requirements as outlined in Exhibit "C."
All designs, drawings, specifications, documents, and other work products, including all electronic files, prepared by the
CONSULTANT prior to completion or termination of this AGREEMENT are instruments of service for this PROJECT,
and are the property of the AGENCY. Reuse by the AGENCY or by others, acting through or on behalf of the AGENCY
of any such instruments of service, not occurring as a part of this PROJECT, shall be without liability or legal exposure to
the CONSULTANT.
Page 2 of 8
16
IV Time for Beginning and Completion
The CONSULTANT shall not begin any work under the terms of this AGREEMENT until authorized in writing by the
AGENCY.
All work under this AGREEMENT shall be completed by the date shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT under
completion date.
The established completion time shall not be extended because of any delays attributable to the CONSULTANT, but
may be extended by the AGENCY in the event of a delay attributable to the AGENCY, or because of unavoidable
delays caused by an act of GOD or governmental actions or other conditions beyond the control of the
CONSULTANT. A prior supplemental agreement issued by the AGENCY is required to extend the established
completion time.
V Payment Provisions
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and services rendered under this
AGREEMENT as provided in Exhibit "D" attached hereto, and by reference made part of this AGREEMENT. Such
payment shall be full compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies,
equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the work. The CONSULTANT shall conform to all applicable
portions of 48 CFR Part 31.
A post audit may be performed on this AGREEMENT. The need for a post audit will be determined by the State
Auditor, WSDOT External Audit Office and /or at the request of the AGENCY'S PROJECT Manager.
VI Sub - Contracting
The AGENCY permits sub - contracts for those items of work as shown in Exhibit "G" attached hereto and by this
reference made part of this AGREEMENT.
Compensation for this sub - consultant work shall be based on the cost factors shown on Exhibit "G."
The work of the sub - consultant shall not exceed its maximum amount payable unless a prior written approval has been
issued by the AGENCY.
All reimbursable direct labor, overhead, direct non -salary costs and fixed fee costs for the sub - consultant shall be
substantiated in the same manner as outlined in Section V. All sub - contracts shall contain all applicable provisions of
this AGREEMENT.
With respect to sub - consultant payment, the CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable sections of the Prompt
Payment laws as set forth in RCW 39.04.250 and RCW 39.76.011.
The CONSULTANT shall not sub - contract for the performance of any work under this AGREEMENT without prior
written permission of the AGENCY. No permission for sub - contracting shall create, between the AGENCY and sub-
contractor, any contract or any other relationship. A DBE certified sub - consultant is required to perform a minimum
amount of their sub - contracted agreement that is established by the WSDOT Highways and Local Programs Project
Development Engineer in consultation with the AGENCY.
VII Employment
The CONSULTANT warrants that they have not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide
employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, to solicit or secure this contract, and that it has not paid or agreed to
pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the CONSULTANT, any fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or
making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the AGENCY shall have the right to annul this
AGREEMENT without liability or, in its discretion, to deduct from the AGREEMENT price or consideration or
otherwise recover the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
Any and all employees of the CONSULTANT or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or
services required of the CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT, shall be considered employees of the
CONSULTANT only and not of the AGENCY, and any and all claims that may arise under any Workmen's
Compensation Act on behalf of said employees or other persons while so engaged, and any and all claims made by a
Page 3 of 8
17
third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of the CONSULTANT'S employees or other persons
while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole obligation and
responsibility of the CONSULTANT.
The CONSULTANT shall not engage, on a full- or part -time basis, or other basis, during the period of the contract, any
professional or technical personnel who are, or have been, at any time during the period of the contract, in the employ
of the United States Department of Transportation, or the STATE, or the AGENCY, except regularly retired
employees, without written consent of the public employer of such person.
VIII Nondiscrimination .
During the performance of this contract, the CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees, and successors in interest agrees
to comply with the following laws and regulations:
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(42 USC Chapter 21 Subchapter V Section 2000d through 2000d -4a)
Federal -aid Highway Act of 1973
(23 USC Chapter 3 Section 324)
Rehabilitation Act of 1973
(29 USC Chapter 16 Subchapter V Section 794)
Age Discrimination Act of 1975
(42 USC Chapter 76 Section 6101 et seq.)
Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987
(Public Law 100 -259)
American with Disabilities Act of 1990
(42 USC Chapter 126 Section 12101 et. seq.)
49 CFR Part 21
23 CFR Part 200
RCW 49.60.180
In relation to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the CONSULTANT is bound by the provisions of Exhibit "H"
attached hereto and by this reference made part of this AGREEMENT, and shall include the attached Exhibit "H" in
every sub - contract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations or
directives issued pursuant thereto.
IX Termination of Agreement
The right is reserved by the AGENCY to terminate this AGREEMENT at any time upon ten (10) days written notice to
the CONSULTANT.
In the event this AGREEMENT is terminated by the AGENCY other than for default on the part of the
CONSULTANT, a final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT as shown in Exhibit "I" for the type of
AGREEMENT used.
No payment shall be made for any work completed after ten (10) days following receipt by the CONSULTANT of the
Notice to Terminate. If the accumulated payment made to the CONSULTANT prior to Notice of Termination exceeds
the total amount that would be due when computed as set forth herein above, then no final payment shall be due and the
CONSULTANT shall immediately reimburse the AGENCY for any excess paid.
If the services of the CONSULTANT are terminated by the AGENCY for default on the part of the CONSULTANT,
the above formula for payment shall not apply.
Page 4 of 8
18
In such an event, the amount to be paid shall be determined by the AGENCY with consideration given to the actual
costs incurred by the CONSULTANT in performing the work to the date of termination, the amount of work originally
required which was satisfactorily completed to date of termination, whether that work is in a form or a type which is
usable to the AGENCY at the time of termination, the cost to the AGENCY of employing another firm to complete the
work required and the time which may be required to do so, and other factors which affect the value to the AGENCY
of the work performed at the time of termination.
Under no circumstances shall payment made under this subsection exceed the amount, which would have been made
using the formula set forth above.
If it is determined for any reason that the CONSULTANT was not in default or that the CONSULTANT'S failure to
perform is without the CONSULTANT'S or it's employee's default or negligence, the termination shall be deemed to
be a termination for the convenience of the AGENCY. In such an event, the CONSULTANT would be reimbursed for
actual costs in accordance with the termination for other than default clauses listed previously.
In the event of the death of any member, partner or officer of the CONSULTANT or any of its supervisory personnel
assigned to the PROJECT, or dissolution of the partnership, termination of the corporation, or disaffiliation of the
principally involved employee, the surviving members of the CONSULTANT hereby agree to complete the work under
the terms of this AGREEMENT, if requested to do so by the AGENCY. This subsection shall not be a bar to
renegotiation of the AGREEMENT between the surviving members of the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY, if the
AGENCY so chooses.
In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in the previous paragraph, should the surviving members of the
CONSULTANT, with the AGENCY'S concurrence, desire to terminate this AGREEMENT, payment shall be made as
set forth in the second paragraph of this section.
Payment for any part of the work by the AGENCY shall not constitute a waiver by the AGENCY of any remedies of
any type it may have against the CONSULTANT for any breach of this AGREEMENT by the CONSULTANT, or for
failure of the CONSULTANT to perform work required of it by the AGENCY. Forbearance of any rights under the
AGREEMENT will not constitute waiver of entitlement to exercise those rights with respect to any future act or
omission by the CONSULTANT.
X Changes of Work
The CONSULTANT shall make such changes and revisions in the complete work of this AGREEMENT as necessary
to correct errors appearing therein, when required to do so by the AGENCY, without additional compensation thereof.
Should the AGENCY find it desirable for its own purposes to have previously satisfactorily completed work or parts
thereof changed or revised, the CONSULTANT shall make such revisions as directed by the AGENCY. This work
shall be considered as Extra Work and will be paid for as herein provided under Section XIV.
XI Disputes
Any dispute concerning questions of fact in connection with the work not disposed of by AGREEMENT between the
CONSULTANT and the AGENCY shall be referred for determination to the Director of Public Works or AGENCY
Engineer, whose decision in the matter shall be final and binding on the parties of this AGREEMENT; provided,
however, that if an action is brought challenging the Director of Public Works or AGENCY Engineer's decision, that
decision shall be subject to de novo judicial review. If the parties to this AGREEMENT mutually agree, disputes
concerning alleged design errors will be conducted under the procedures found in Exhibit "J ", and disputes concerning
claims will be conducted under the procedures found in Exhibit "K ".
XII Venue, Applicable Law, and Personal Jurisdiction
In the event that either party deems it necessary to institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any right or
obligation under this AGREEMENT, the parties hereto agree that any such action shall be initiated in the Superior
court of the State of Washington, situated in the county in which the AGENCY is located. The parties hereto agree that
all questions shall be resolved by application of Washington law and that the parties to such action shall have the right
of appeal from such decisions of the Superior court in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. The
CONSULTANT hereby consents to the personal jurisdiction of the Superior court of the State of Washington, situated
in the county in which the AGENCY is located.
Page 5 of 8
19
XIII Legal Relations
The CONSULTANT shall comply with all Federal, State, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work to be
done under this AGREEMENT. This contract shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Washington.
The CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold the AGENCY and the STATE and its officers and employees harmless
from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands, or suits at law or equity arising in whole or
in part from the CONSULTANT'S negligence or breach of any of its obligations under this AGREEMENT; provided
that nothing herein shall require a CONSULTANT to indemnify the AGENCY or the STATE against and hold
harmless the AGENCY or the STATE from claims, demands or suits based solely upon the conduct of the AGENCY or
the STATE, their agents, officers and employees; and provided further that if the claims or suits are caused by or result
from the concurrent negligence of (a) the CONSULTANT'S agents or employees, and (b) the AGENCY or the
STATE, their agents, officers and employees, this indemnity provision with respect to (1) claims or suits based upon
such negligence (2) the costs to the AGENCY or the STATE of defending such claims and suits shall be valid and
enforceable only to the extent of the CONSULTANT'S negligence or the negligence of the CONSULTANT'S agents
or employees.
The CONSULTANT'S relation to the AGENCY shall be at all times as an independent contractor.
The CONSULTANT shall comply with all applicable sections of the applicable Ethics laws, including RCW 42.23,
which is the Code of Ethics for regulating contract interest by municipal officers. The CONSULTANT specifically
assumes potential liability for actions brought by the CONSULTANT'S own employees against the AGENCY and,
solely for the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the CONSULTANT specifically waives any immunity under
the state industrial insurance law, Title 51 RCW.
Unless otherwise specified in the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall be responsible for administration of construction
contracts, if any, on the PROJECT. Subject to the processing of a new sole source, or an acceptable supplemental
agreement, the CONSULTANT shall provide On -Call assistance to the AGENCY during contract administration. By
providing such assistance, the CONSULTANT shall assume no responsibility for: proper construction techniques, job
site safety, or any construction contractor's failure to perform its work in accordance with the contract documents.
The CONSULTANT shall obtain and keep in force during the terms of the AGREEMENT, or as otherwise required,
the following insurance with companies or through sources approved by the State Insurance Commissioner pursuant to
Title 48 RCW.
Insurance Coverage
A. Worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as required by the STATE.
B. Commercial general liability written under ISO Form CG 00 01 12 04 or its equivalent with minimum limits of
one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrences and two million dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate for each
policy period.
C. Vehicle liability insurance for any automobile used in an amount not less than a one million dollar ($1,000,000)
combined single limit.
Excepting the Worker's Compensation Insurance and any Professional Liability Insurance secured by the
CONSULTANT, the AGENCY will be named on all policies as an additional insured. The CONSULTANT shall
furnish the AGENCY with verification of insurance and endorsements required by the AGREEMENT. The AGENCY
reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Washington. The
CONSULTANT shall submit a verification of insurance as outlined above within fourteen (14) days of the execution of
this AGREEMENT to the AGENCY.
No cancellation of the foregoing policies shall be effective without thirty (30) days prior notice to the AGENCY.
The CONSULTANT'S professional liability to the AGENCY shall be limited to the amount payable under this
AGREEMENT or one million ($1,000,000) dollars, whichever is the greater, unless modified by Exhibit "L ". In no
case shall the CONSULTANT'S professional liability to third parties be limited in any way.
Page 6of8
20
The AGENCY will pay no progress payments under Section V until the CONSULTANT has fully complied with this
section. This remedy is not exclusive; and the AGENCY and the STATE may take such other action as is available to it
under other provisions of this AGREEMENT, or otherwise in law.
XIV Extra Work
A. The AGENCY may at any time, by written order, make changes within the general scope of the AGREEMENT in
the services to be performed.
B. If any such change causes an increase or decrease in the estimated cost of, or the time required for, performance of
any part of the work under this AGREEMENT, whether or not changed by the order, or otherwise affects any other
terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall make an equitable adjustment in the (1) maximum
amount payable; (2) delivery or completion schedule, or both; and (3) other affected terms and shall modify the
AGREEMENT accordingly.
C. The CONSULTANT must submit any "request for equitable adjustment ", hereafter referred to as "CLAIM ", under
this clause within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of the written order. However, if the AGENCY decides
that the facts justify it, the AGENCY may receive and act upon a CLAIM submitted before final payment of the
AGREEMENT.
D. Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a dispute under the Disputes clause. However, nothing in this clause
shall excuse the CONSULTANT from proceeding with the AGREEMENT as changed.
E. Notwithstanding the terms and conditions of paragraphs (A) and (B) above, the maximum amount payable for this
AGREEMENT, shall not be increased or considered to be increased except by specific written supplement to this
AGREEMENT.
XV Endorsement of Plans
If applicable, the CONSULTANT shall place their endorsement on all plans, estimates, or any other engineering data
furnished by them.
XVI Federal and State Review
The Federal Highway Administration and the Washington State Department of Transportation shall have the right to
participate in the review or examination of the work in progress.
XVII Certification of the Consultant and the Agency
Attached hereto as Exhibit "M -1(a and b)" are the Certifications of the CONSULTANT and the AGENCY, Exhibit "M
-2" Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters - Primary Covered Transactions,
Exhibit "M -3" Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying and Exhibit "M -4"
Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data. Exhibit "M -3" is required only in AGREEMENTS over $100,000 and
Exhibit "M -4" is required only in AGREEMENTS over $500,000.
XVIII Complete Agreement
This document and referenced attachments contain all covenants, stipulations, and provisions agreed upon by the
parties. No agent, or representative of either party has authority to make, and the parties shall not be bound by or be
liable for, any statement, representation, promise or agreement not set forth herein. No changes, amendments, or
modifications of the terms hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and signed by the parties as an amendment to
this AGREEMENT.
XIX Execution and Acceptance
This AGREEMENT may be simultaneously executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an
original having identical legal effect. The CONSULTANT does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representations,
warranties, covenants, and agreements contained in the proposal, and the supporting material submitted by the
CONSULTANT, and does hereby accept the AGREEMENT and agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof.
Page 7 of 8
21
In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year shown in the
"Execution Date" box on page one (1) of this AGREEMENT.
By
Consultant F -C-0/1j
DOT
By
Agency
Page 8of8
22
Tukwila Transit Center Project
City of Tukwila
Exhibit A -1
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Construction Management and Contract Administration Services for the
Tukwila Transit Center Project
City of Tukwila
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. ( "Consultant ") proposes to provide to the City of Tukwila, Washington
( "Client ") construction management services for the Tukwila Transit Center Project (hereinafter called
"Project "). These services will include inspection, construction management, and contract administration
assistance during the construction of the project as detailed in the following:
I. INTRODUCTION
The following scope of services is based upon the assumptions outlined herein. Associated costs are
detailed in EXHIBIT E -1.
Assumptions:
• The proposed project team will include a part-time resident engineer and document administrator;
and a full -time assistant resident engineering and construction inspector. Allowances for materials
testing and surveying are included in this scope.
• A standard working week for project staff is 40 hrs. Should the Client direct fewer hours, the
Consultant will not guarantee to perform all of the scope items included in the corresponding subtask
during the time spent off the project.
• Services will be performed in accordance with the Local Agency Guidelines (LAG) and the WSDOT
Construction Manual. The man -hours proposed by the Consultant are an estimate only and are
subject to change based on the actual construction schedule and working hours of the Contractor.
• Mileage charges will be invoiced at the current USGAO rates.
• Design by Others: It is understood and agreed that the Consultant did not prepare the Contract
Documents for the project, and the Client will provide the Consultant the support of the Engineer -of-
Record during the course of the Consultant's work.
I. DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK
Subtask 1 — Administration /Quality Control
Consistent with the hours shown in EXHIBIT E -1, the Consultant shall provide overall project
management and contract administration associated with the service agreement between the Consultant
and the Client. This effort will include the following elements:
1.1 Prepare of Consultant invoicing and progress reporting to the Client.
1.2 Perform internal administration of the Consultant's Task Order.
1.3 Prepare any supplements to the Consultant's Task Order.
1.4 Attend pre- construction conference.
1.5 Make periodic field visits and conduct project reviews for the quality of services provided by
AECOM and consistency with AECOM's project quality plan.
Page 1 of 5
Updated: 11 /18/2013
23
Tukwila Transit Center Project
City of Tukwila
Subtask 2 — Document Control
Consistent with the hours shown in EXHIBIT E -1, the Consultant shall provide document control services
including the following elements:
2.1 Process; track and archive construction records including: Inspectors Daily Reports (IDR's);
Requests for Information (RFI's); Submittals; Requests for Approval of Materials (RAM's);
Statements of Working Days. Consultant shall maintain submittal and RFI logs to track when
documents are received and returned to the contractor.
2.2 Compile and review inspector pay quantity and force account records, and prepare monthly
contractor progress estimates.
2.3 Review and archive project record documentation associated with prevailing wage reporting,
including Requests to Sublet, Intents to Pay Prevailing Wage, Certified Payroll, Affidavits of
Wages Paid, and Contractor employee wage interviews.
2.4 Review and archive Certificates of Materials Origin tracking and reconcile against the Projects
Record of Materials.
2.5 Review and archive DBE participation and training goals documentation.
2.6 Prepare and assist with 1 mid - project audit and 1 final regulatory audit of the construction
project record.
2.7 Attend and provide minutes for the preconstruction conference and up to 40 weekly contractor
construction progress meetings.
2.8 Maintain a material testing log that tracks the test date, type of material test, test result,
specification requirement and action taken if a failed result is received from the material testing
consultant.
2.9 Maintain a list of approved change orders and potential change orders. Potential change orders
will have a force account estimate of the extra work related to that item(s), until an approved
change order is executed.
Subtask 3 — Field Inspection
The Consultant shall provide construction inspection services for up to 280 full -time days, consistent
with the hours shown in. EXHIBIT E -1. This effort will include the following elements:
3.1 Prepare daily construction reports recording the contractor's operations performed for each day
the Consultant is on site; measure the quantities of materials installed, log equipment and staff
present, weather conditions, and any observed problems or construction issues.
3.2 Prepare Daily Payment Notes, Statements of Working Days, and Force Account Records (if
necessary).
3.3 Respond to contractor questions which may arise as to the quality and acceptability of
furnished materials or work performed.
3.4 Respond to general questions raised by adjacent property owners, businesses, or general
public. Complaints or detailed questions shall be referred to the Client.
3.5 Prepare field records and documents in accordance with Projects Record of Materials.
3.6 Coordinate with Resident Engineer and Client for changes and updates to the ROM.
3.7 For each day the Consultant is on site, provide photographs of traffic control set -up and work
activities during the course of construction. Photographs will be in digital format and cataloged
by date.
3.8 Facilitate coordination with property owners, businesses, King County Metro, and other project
stakeholders.
3.9 Facilitate the Contractor's coordination of existing utilities within the project boundaries.
Page 2 of 5
Updated: 11/18/2013
24
Tukwila Transit Center Project
City of Tukwila
3.10 Review the Record of Materials (ROM) against the material testing results provided by the
Project's material testing consultant, and advise the Contractor accordingly.
3.11 Monitor the Contractor's compliance with water quality permits and the requirements of the
TESC and SPCC Plans.
3.12 Attend weekly construction meetings up to 40 weekly meetings.
3.13 The Construction Inspector shall review monthly pay estimates with the Contractor and provide
recommendations to the Resident Engineer and Client.
3.14 Review the Contractor's construction record drawings on a weekly basis. Upon project
completion, verify Contractor provided markups accuracy and forward to the Client. The
Consultant Inspector will track and record field changes on drawings and use this information to
verify the Contractor's construction record drawings.
3.15 Participate in the Project's final inspection and assist in developing a list of any remaining
deficiencies.
3.16 Attend pre- construction conference.
3.17 For the days present on site, the construction inspector shall observe day -to -day construction
activities. By providing inspection oversight, the Consultant shall assume no responsibility for
proper construction techniques or job site safety but will report to the Contractor and Client any
known public safety concerns immediately. The presence of the Consultant's personnel at the
construction site is for the purpose of providing to the Client a greater degree of confidence that
the completed work will generally conform to the Contract Documents and that the integrity of
the design concept as reflected in the Contract Documents has been implemented and
preserved by the Construction Contractor.
3.18 The Consultant will endeavor to protect all parties against defects and deficiencies in the work
of the Contractor, but cannot guarantee the Contractor's performance and shall not be
responsible for construction means, methods, measurements, techniques, sequences of
procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work performed by
the Construction Contractor and any subcontractors.
Subtask 4 — Construction Management
Provide construction management services, consistent with the hours shown in EXHIBIT B. This effort
will include the following elements:
4.2 Supervise the Consultant's field personnel assigned to the project.
4.3 Liaison between the Contractor's management and the Client's management personnel, acting
as the direct point of contract for both parties.
4.4 Organize and chair the Pre - construction conference
4.5 Review and approve daily construction reports prepared by the construction inspector.
4.6 Respond to contractor questions which may arise as to the quality and acceptability of
furnished materials, work performed, and to general questions raised by adjacent property
owners or general public.
4.7 Respond to Contractor RFI's, and defer to the Engineer of Record for a response when
appropriate.
4.8 Review Contractor submittals, and defer to the Engineer of Record for a review when
appropriate.
4.9 Coordinate off -site fabrication inspection by others.
4.10 Review ROM and material testing results and advise the Contractor accordingly.
Page 3 of 5 Updated 11/18/2013
25
Tukwila Transit Center Project
City of Tukwila
4.11 Review the Contractor's baseline project schedule, and then monitor that schedule throughout
the course of the project for compliance with the provisions of the Contract. Monitoring shall
include review of periodic schedule updates submitted by the Contractor.
4.12 Facilitate coordination between the Contractor, Client and project stakeholders regarding status
and issues of construction activities.
4.13 Facilitate utility coordination for existing and new utility improvements.
4.14 Chair up to 40 weekly construction meetings.
4.15 Prepare official correspondence to the Contractor and issue upon the Client's approval.
4.16 Issue field directives and stop work notices to the Contractor when necessary, with the Client's
approval.
4.17 Issue Correction Notices when appropriate.
4.18 Review monthly pay estimates with the Contractor and provide recommendation to the Client
for release of payment.
4.19 Supervise contract close -out activities including as -built drawings, final payment, and
completion notices. Consultant shall provide the Client, at contract close -out, construction
records to the all applicable funding agencies.
4.20 The Consultant shall assume no responsibility for proper construction techniques or job site
safety but will report to the Contractor and Client any observed public safety concerns
immediately. The presence of the Consultant's personnel at the construction site is for the
purpose of providing to the Client a greater degree of confidence that the completed work will
generally conform to the Contract Documents and that the integrity of the design concept as
reflected in the Contract Documents has been implemented and preserved by the construction
Contractor.
4.21 The Consultant will endeavor to protect all parties against defects and deficiencies in the work
of the Contractor, but cannot guarantee the Contractors' performance and shall not be
responsible for construction means, methods, measurements, techniques, sequences of
procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work performed by
the construction contractor and any subcontractors.
Subtask 5 — Public Outreach / Client Meetings
The Consultant's construction inspector shall provide limited assistance with project outreach consistent
with the following:
The Consultant shall, under direction of the Client, assist with delivering informational flyers for the
upcoming construction activities, road closures, temporary traffic controls, and other pertinent information.
The Consultant shall also assist the Client in responding to questions and issues raised by private
citizens and local businesses relative to the Project.
Subtask 6 — Materials Testing
The Consultant will retain a materials testing subconsultant to perform soil and concrete testing which
includes: gradations, in -place density, Proctor compaction tests, concrete air entrainment, concrete test
cylinders, and asphalt composition. These services are budgeted as an allowance and the actual costs of
the testing effort may vary. The Consultant shall advise the Client regarding the status of the materials
testing budget to allow funds to be added or removed as necessary.
Page 4 of 5
Updated 11 /16/2013
26
Tukwila Transit Center Project
City of Tukwila
Subtask 7 - Survey Verification
The Consultant will retain a surveying subconsultant to perform verification surveys of two existing
permanent benchmarks and temporary benchmarks established by the Contractor. These services are
budgeted as an allowance and the actual costs of the surveying effort may vary. The Consultant shall
advise the Client on the surveying budget status to allow funds to be added or removed as necessary.
Subtask 8 — Change Order Resolution
The Consultant shall provide services up to 80 hours for preparing change order packages, this includes
independent cost estimates (ICE), change order forms; and, force account records.
Subtask 9 — Claims /Disputes Support
No services are provided under this section.
III. Consultant Deliverables; including but not limited to:
Inspector Daily Reports
ii. Construction Photographs —1 Set
Weekly Meeting Minutes and Agendas
iv. Submittal, RFI, and Material Testing Logs
v. Change Order and Potential Change Order Log
vi. Declaration of Substantial Completion
vii. Monthly Contractor Pay Requests with field note record and quantity documentation
viii. Punch -lists and tracking documentation
ix. Physical Completion Letter and Recommendation of Final Acceptance Letter
x. All Project Records received from the Contractor described under Subtask 2
xi. Other records generated as a result of this Contract, when demanded by the Client, or as
deemed necessary by a public record request.
IV. Responsibilities of the Client
Provide CM oversight and approval authority for all construction activities.
ii. Manage the Designer -on- Record team as part of the Project Designer's on -call design
support and architectural submittal review.
Process all contract documents through the City's approval process (e.g. CM services
invoices, construction contract, monthly pay estimates, change order execution, cost
reduction proposals, time extensions, etc.).
iv. Provide preferred forms and formats, and filing structure to the Consultant.
v. Oversee the Consultant on conducting schedule evaluation, monitoring, and evaluate Time
Impact Analysis for changes.
vi. Provide and assist the Consultant in utility coordination with third -party utilities under project
specific or franchise agreements.
vii. Review the Pre - Construction Conference agenda and all hand -out materials, before the
Consultant conducts the Pre - Construction Conference.
viii. Coordinate and schedule any public meetings required before, during and after construction.
ix. Provide operations & maintenance interface with other City Staff for ongoing project issues.
x. Provide CM tools for Team use including: Project ROM, IDR, Project File Index, Change
Order, Force Account tracking and Pay Estimate forms.
Page 5 of 5 Updated 11/18/2013
27
Exhibit C
Electronic Exchange of Engineering and Other Data
In this Exhibit the agency, as applicable, is to provide a description of the format and standards the
consultant is to use in preparing electronic files for transmission to the agency. The format and standards to
be provided may include, but are not limited to, the following:
I. Surveying, Roadway Design & Plans Preparation Section
A. Survey Data
B. Roadway Design Files
C. Computer Aided Drafting Files
D. Specify the Agency's Right to Review Product with the Consultant
E. Specify the Electronic Deliverables to Be Provided to the Agency
F. Specify What Agency Furnished Services and Information Is to Be Provided
II. Any Other Electronic Files to Be Provided
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit C
Revised 10/2013
28
III. Methods to Electronically Exchange Data
A. Agency Software Suite
B. Electronic Messaging System
C. File Transfers Format
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit C
Revised 10/2013
29
Exhibit D -2
Payment (Cost Plus a Fixed Fee)
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY for completed work and services rendered under this
AGREEMENT as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or
services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the
work specified in Section II, "Scope of Work." The CONSULTANT shall conform to all applicable portions of
48 CFR Part 31.
A. Actual Costs: Payment for all consulting services for this PROJECT shall be on the basis of the
CONSULTANT'S actual cost plus a fixed fee. The actual cost shall include direct salary cost,
overhead, direct non -salary costs, and fixed fee.
1. Direct Salary Costs: The Direct Salary Cost is the direct salary paid to principals,
professional, technical, and clerical personnel for the time they are productively
engaged in work necessary to fulfill the terms of this AGREEMENT. The
CONSULTANT shall maintain support data to verify the direct salary costs billed
to the AGENCY.
2. Overhead Costs: Overhead Costs are those costs other than direct costs, which are
included as such on the books of the CONSULTANT in the normal everyday
keeping of its books. Progress payments shall be made at the rate shown in the
heading of this AGREEMENT under "Overhead Progress Payment Rate." Total
overhead payment shall be based on the method shown in the heading of the
AGREEMENT. The two options are explained as follows:
a. Fixed Rate: If this method is indicated in the heading of the AGREEMENT the
AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSULTANT for overhead at the
percentage rate shown. This rate shall not change during the life of the
AGREEMENT.
b. Actual Cost: If this method is indicated in the heading of the AGREEMENT the
AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSULTANT the actual overhead costs
verified by audit, up to the Maximum Total Amount Payable, authorized under
this AGREEMENT, when accumulated with all other Actual Costs.
A summary of the CONSULTANTS cost estimate and the overhead
computation is shown in Exhibit "E" attached hereto and by this reference made
part of this AGREEMENT. When an Actual Cost method is used, the
CONSULTANT (prime and all sub - consultants) will submit to the AGENCY
within six (6) months after the end of each firm's fiscal year, an overhead
schedule in the format required by the AGENCY (cost category, dollar
expenditures, etc.) for the purpose of adjusting the overhead rate for billing
purposes. It shall be used for the computation of progress payments during the
following year and for retroactively adjusting the previous year's overhead cost
to reflect the actual rate.
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit D -2
Revised 6/08
30
Failure to supply this information by either the prime CONSULTANT or any of their sub -
consultants shall cause the AGENCY to withhold payment of the billed overhead costs until
such time as the required information is received and an overhead rate for billing purposes is
approved.
The AGENCY, STATE and/or the Federal Government may perform an audit of the
CONSULTANT'S books and records at any time during regular business hours to determine
the actual overhead rate, if they so desire.
3. Direct Non -Salary Costs: Direct Non -Salary Costs will be reimbursed at the Actual Cost to
the CONSULTANT. These charges may include, but are not limited to, the following
items: travel, printing, long distance telephone, supplies, computer charges and sub -
consultant costs.
a. Air or train travel will be reimbursed only to economy class levels unless
otherwise approved by the AGENCY. The CONSULTANT shall comply with
the rules and regulations regarding travel costs (excluding air, train, and rental
car costs) in accordance with the AGENCY'S Travel Rules and Procedures.
However, air, train, and rental car costs shall be reimbursed in accordance with
48 CFR Part 31.205 -46 "Travel Cost
b. The billing for Direct Non -Salary Costs shall include an itemized listing of
the charges directly identifiable wh the PROJECT.
c. The CONSULTANT shall maintain the original supporting documents in their
office. Copies of the original supporting documents shall be supplied to the
AGENCY upon request.
d. All above charges must be necessary for the services provided under this
AGREEMENT.
4. Fixed Fee: The Fixed Fee, which represents the CONSULTANT'S profit, is shown in the
heading of this AGREEMENT under Fixed Fee. This amount does not include any
additional Fixed Fee, which could be authorized from the Management Reserve Fund. This
fee is based on the Scope of Work defined in this AGREEMENT and the estimated person -
hours required to perform the stated Scope of Work. In the event the CONSULTANT
enters into a supplemental AGREEMENT for additional work, the supplemental
AGREEMENT may include provisions for the added costs and an appropriate additional
fee. The Fixed Fee will be prorated and paid monthly in proportion to the percentage of
work completed by the CONSULTANT and reported in the Monthly Progress Reports
accompanying the billings. Any portion of the Fixed Fee earned but not previously paid in
the progress payments will be covered in the final payment, subject to the provisions of
Section IX entitled "Termination of Agreement."
5. Management Reserve Fund: The AGENCY may desire to establish a Management Reserve
Fund to provide the Agreement Administrator with the flexibility to authorize additional
funds to the AGREEMENT for allowable unforeseen costs, or reimbursing the
CONSULTANT for additional work beyond that already defined in this AGREEMENT.
Such authorization(s) shall be in writing and shall not exceed
31
the lesser of $100,000 or 10% of the Total Amount Authorized as shown in the heading
of this AGREEMENT. The amount included for the Management Reserve Fund is
shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT. This fund may not be replenished. Any
changes requiring additional costs in excess of the Management Reserve Fund shall be
made in accordance with Section XIV, "Extra Work. "6. Maximum Total Amount
Payable: The Maximum Total Amount Payable by the AGENCY to the
CONSULTANT under this AGREEMENT shall not exceed the amount shown in the
heading of this AGREEMENT. The Maximum Total Amount Payable is comprised of
the Total Amount Authorized, and the Management Reserve Fund. The Maximum
Total Amount Payable does not include payment for Extra Work as stipulated in
Section XIV, "Extra Work." No minimum amount payable is guaranteed under this
AGREEMENT.
B. Monthly Progress Payments: The CONSULTANT may submit billings to the AGENCY for
reimbursement of Actual Costs plus the calculated overhead and fee on a monthly basis during the
progress of the work. Such billings shall be in a format approved by the AGENCY and
accompanied by the monthly progress reports required under Section III, "General Requirements"
of this AGREEMENT. The billings will be supported by an itemized listing for each item including
Direct Salary, Direct Non - Salary, and allowable Overhead Costs to which will be added the
prorated Fixed Fee. To provide a means of verifying the billed salary costs for CONSULTANT
employees, the AGENCY may conduct employee interviews. These interviews may consist of
recording the names, titles, salary rates, and present duties of those employees performing work on
the PROJECT at the time of the interview.
C. Final Payment: Final Payment of any balance due the CONSULTANT of the gross amount earned
will be made promptly upon its verification by the AGENCY after the completion of the work
under this AGREEMENT, contingent upon receipt of all PS &E, plans, maps, notes, reports,
electronic data and other related documents which are required to be furnished under this
AGREEMENT. Acceptance of such Final Payment by the CONSULTANT shall constitute a
release of all claims for payment, which the CONSULTANT may have against the AGENCY
unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the AGENCY by the
CONSULTANT prior to its acceptance. Said Final Payment shall not, however, be a bar to any
claims that the AGENCY may have against the CONSULTANT or to any remedies the AGENCY
may pursue with respect to such claims.
The payment of any billing will not constitute agreement as to the appropriateness of any item
and at the time of final audit, all required adjustments will be made and reflected in a final payment.
In the event that such final audit reveals an overpayment to the CONSULTANT, the
CONSULTANT will refund such overpayment to the AGENCY within thirty (30) days of notice of
the overpayment. Such refund shall not constitute a waiver by the CONSULTANT for any claims
relating to the validity of a finding by the AGENCY of overpayment. The CONSULTANT has
twenty (20) days after receipt of the final POST AUDIT to begin the appeal process to the
AGENCY for audit findings.
D. Inspection of Cost Records: The CONSULTANT and their sub - consultants shall keep available for
inspection by representatives of the AGENCY, STATE and the United States, for a period of three
(3) years after receipt of final payment, the cost records and accounts pertaining to this
AGREEMENT and all items related to or bearing upon these records with the following exception:
if any litigation, claim or audit arising out of, in connection with, or related to this contract is
initiated before the expiration of the three (3) year period, the cost records and accounts shall be
retained until such litigation, claim, or audit involving the records is completed.
32
Exhibit E -1
Consultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet
City of Tukwila - Tukwila Transit Center
ACOM
AECOM Labor - Home Office
Employee Classification Hours Rate Cost
Mike Horton PM / QC 188.00 $ 72.43 $13,616.88
188.00 $13,616.88
$13,616.88
Overhead (OH Cost — Including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC of 156.22% x $13,616.88 $21,272.29
Fee
Fee Rate x DSC of 30.00% x $13,616.88 $4,085.06
Labor Subtotal - Home Office $38,974.23
AECOM Labor - Field Office
Employee Classification Hours Rate Cost
Jim Fillis RE 800.00 $ 82.02 $65,614.56
Janet Lee ARE 1,712.00 $ 42.84 $73,342.08
Tom Bowers Field Lead 1,600.00 $ 52.31 $83,688.96
Silvia Manescu Documentation 300.00 $ 39.92 $11,976.84
Leroy Clark Inspection 320.00 $ 49.66 $15,892.42
Jesse Rogers Arch. Inspection 200.00 $ 34.81 $6,962.52
Jim Mulhearn Scheduling 0.00 $ 70.00 $0.00
4,932.00 $257,477.38
Total DSC $257,477.38
Overhead (OH Cost — Including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC of 122.43% x $257,477.38 $315,229.56
Fee:
Fee Rate x DSC of 30.00% x $257,477.38 $77,243.21
Labor Subtotal - Field Office $649,950.15
Labor Subtotal $688,924.38
Reimbursable
Vehicles - Mileage
Expenses
Subconsultant
Materials Testing Allowance
Surveying
Cost
$ 16,000.00
$ 6,425.68
$22,425.68
Cost
$20,000.00
$8,000.00
$28,000.00
Agreement Total (including fee)
$739,350.06
Fixed Fee Total
$81,328.27
33
Exhibit F
Breakdown of Overhead Cost
Please see the attached sheets.
34
71f
Washington State
Department of Transportation
Paula J. Hammond, P.E.
Secretary of Transportation
July 17, 2012
John McNamara, Government Accounting & Cost Compliance
AECOM
701 Edgewater Drive
Wakefield MA 01880 -6242
RE: Aecom Technical Services, Inc. Overhead Schedules
Fiscal Year End September 30, 2011
Dear Mr. McNamara:
Transportation Building
310 Maple Park Avenue S.E.
P.O. Box 47300
Olympia, WA 98504 -7300
360 - 705 -7000
TTY: 1- 800 - 833 -6388
www.wsdot.wa.gov
We have completed a desk review of your overhead schedule for the above referenced
fiscal year. Our review included the documentation provided by Aecom Technical
Services, Inc.
The schedule was audited by the Cleary & Gill, LLC for compliance with Part 31 of the
Federal Acquisition Regulations. Cleary & Gill, LLC accepted an overhead rate for the
year ended September 30, 2011, home office rate at 156.22% of direct labor and a field
office rate at 122.43% of direct labor.
The reviewed data included, but was not limited to; the schedule of the indirect cost rate,
a description of the company, basis of accounting and description of Aecom Technical
Services, Inc. accounting system and the basis of indirect costs.
Based on our work, we are issuing this letter of review establishing Aecom Technical
Services, Inc. overhead rate for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2011. The
Company Wide Rate (Composite Rate) is 147.66% of direct labor. Included within this
rate are the Home Rate of 156.22% of direct labor, and the Field Rate of 122.43% of
direct labor. Costs billed to actual agreements will still be subject to audit of actual costs.
Please check with the WSDOT Consultant Services Office (HQ) and /or the WSDOT
Area Consultant Liaison to determine when this reviewed rate will be applicable to your
WSDOT agreement(s).
Also, remember that when you provide next year's overhead schedule to our office, you
will also need to submit either your internally prepared Compensation Analysis for our
review, or use the National Compensation Matrix (NCM) format to prepare your
alternate analysis and we will review that. The NCM is a tool that establishes
compensation amounts presumed reasonable for certain executive positions. The
35
Mr. McNamara
July 17, 2012
Page 2
Compensation Analysis and NCM are described further in the AASHTO Audit Guide,
Chapter 7. We will need your Compensation Analysis, or alternative analysis based on
use of the NCM, in order to complete our review of your overhead schedule.
If you, or any representatives of Aecom Technical Services, Inc., have any questions,
please contact Martha Roach, Jeri Sivertson, or Steve McKerney at (360) 705 -7003.
Sincerely,
'G?Z plate yi;?�i.�l/L
Martha S. Roach
Agreement Compliance Audit Manager
MR:ds
Enclosure
cc: Steve McKerney, Director of Internal Audit
Jeri Sivertson, Assistant Director of Internal Audit
Larry Schofield, MS 47323
Jessica Goldsberry, Aecom US West Region Finance & Accounting
File
36
Exhibit H
Title VI Assurances
During the performance of this AGREEMENT, the CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees, and successors in
interest agrees as follows:
1. Compliance with Regulations: The CONSULTANT shall comply with the Regulations relative to non-
discrimination in federally assisted programs of the AGENCY, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part
21, as they may be amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the "REGULATIONS "), which
are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this AGREEMENT.
2. Non - discrimination: The CONSULTANT, with regard to the work performed during the
AGREEMENT, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in the selection
and retention of sub - consultants, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The
CONSULTANT shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by
Section 21.5 of the REGULATIONS, including employment practices when the AGREEMENT covers a
program set forth in Appendix B of the REGULATIONS.
3. Solicitations for Sub - consultants, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations
either by competitive bidding or negotiations made by the CONSULTANT for work to be performed
under a sub - contract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential sub -
consultant or supplier shall be notified by the CONSULTANT of the CONSULTANT'S obligations under
this AGREEMENT and the REGULATIONS relative to non - discrimination on the grounds of race, color,
sex, or national origin.
4. Information and Reports: The CONSULTANT shall provide all information and reports required by the
REGULATIONS or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access to its books, records,
accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by AGENCY, STATE or
the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such
REGULATIONS, orders and instructions. Where any information required of a CONSULTANT is in the
exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the CONSULTANT shall
so certify to the AGENCY, STATE or the FHWA as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has
made to obtain the information.
5. Sanctions for Non - compliance: In the event of the CONSULTANT'S non - compliance with the non-
discrimination provisions of this AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall impose such AGREEMENT
sanctions as it, the STATE or the FHWA may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limited to:
Withholding of payments to the CONSULTANT under the AGREEMENT until the
CONSULTANT complies, and/or;
• Cancellation, termination, or suspension of the AGREEMENT, in whole or in part
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit H
Revised 6/05
37
6. Incorporation of Provisions: The CONSULTANT shall include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through
(5) in every sub - contract, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by
the REGULATIONS, or directives issued pursuant thereto. The CONSULTANT shall take such action
with respect to any sub - consultant or procurement as the AGENCY, STATE or FHWA may direct as a
means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for non - compliance.
Provided, however, that in the event a CONSULTANT becomes involved in, or is threatened with,
litigation with a sub - consultant or supplier as a result of such direction, the CONSULTANT may request
the AGENCY and the STATE enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the AGENCY and the
STATE and, in addition, the CONSULTANT may request the United States enter into such litigation to
protect the interests of the United States.
38
Exhibit I
Payment Upon Termination of Agreement
By the Agency Other Than for
Fault of the Consultant
(Refer to Agreement, Section IX)
Lump Sum Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made shall
total the same percentage of the Lump Sum Amount as the work completed at the time of termination is to the
total work required for the PROJECT. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra
work completed.
Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT which when added to any payments previously made, shall
total the actual costs plus the same percentage of the fixed fee as the work completed at the time of termination is
to the total work required for the Project. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall be paid for any authorized extra
work completed.
Specific Rates of Pay Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual hours charged at the time of termination of this
AGREEMENT plus any direct nonsalary costs incurred at the time of termination of this AGREEMENT.
Cost Per Unit of Work Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSULTANT for actual units of work completed at the time of
termination of this AGREEMENT.
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit!
Revised 6/05
39
Exhibit J
Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedures
The purpose of this exhibit is to establish a procedure to determine if a consultant's alleged design error is of a
nature that exceeds the accepted standard of care. In addition, it will establish a uniform method for the resolution
and/or cost recovery procedures in those instances where the agency believes it has suffered some material damage
due to the alleged error by the consultant.
Step 1 — Potential Consultant Design Error(s) is Identified by Agency's Project Manager
At the first indication of potential consultant design error(s), the first step in the process is for the Agency's
project manager to notify the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer regarding the potential
design error(s). For federally funded projects, the Region Highways and Local Programs Engineer
should be informed and involved in these procedures. (Note: The Director of Public Works or Agency
Engineer may appoint an agency staff person other than the project manager, who has not been as
directly involved in the project, to be responsible for the remaining steps in these procedures.)
Step 2 - Project Manager Documents the Alleged Consultant Design Error(s)
After discussion of the alleged design error(s) and the magnitude of the alleged error(s), and with the
Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer's concurrence, the project manager obtains more detailed
documentation than is normally required on the project. Examples include: all decisions and
descriptions of work; photographs, records of labor, materials and equipment.
Step 3 — Contact the Consultant Regarding the Alleged Design Error(s)
If it is determined that there is a need to proceed further, the next step in the process is for the project
manager to contact the consultant regarding the alleged design error(s) and the magnitude of the alleged
error(s). The project manager and other appropriate agency staff should represent the agency and the
consultant should be represented by their project manger and any personnel (including sub - consultants)
deemed appropriate for the alleged design error(s) issue.
Step 4 — Attempt to Resolve Alleged Design Error with Consultant
After the meeting(s) with the consultant have been completed regarding the consultant's alleged design
error(s), there are three possible scenarios:
• It is determined via mutual agreement that there is not a consultant design error(s). If
this is the case, then the process will not proceed beyond this point.
It is determined via mutual agreement that a consultant design error(s) occurred. If this
is the case, then the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer, or their
representatives, negotiate a settlement with the consultant. The settlement would be
paid to the agency or the amount would be reduced from the consultant's agreement
with the agency for the services on the project in which
the design error took place. The agency is to provide H &LP, through the Region
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit J
Revised 6/05
40
Local Programs Engineer, a summary of the settlement for review and to make
adjustments, if any, as to how the settlement affects federal reimbursements. No
further action is required.
There is not a mutual agreement regarding the alleged consultant design error(s). The
consultant may request that the alleged design error(s) issue be forwarded to
the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer for review. If the Director of
Public Works or Agency Engineer, after review with their legal counsel, is not able
to reach mutual agreement with the consultant, proceed to Step 5.
Step 5 — Forward Documents to Highways and Local Programs
For federally funded projects all available information, including costs, should be forwarded through the
Region Highways and Local Programs Engineer to H &LP for their review and consultation with
the FHWA. H &LP will meet with representatives of the agency and the consultant to review the
alleged design error(s), and attempt to find a resolution to the issue. If necessary, H &LP will
request assistance from the Attorney General's Office for legal interpretation. H &LP will also
identify how the alleged error(s) affects eligibility of project costs for federal reimbursement.
If mutual agreement is reached, the agency and consultant adjust the scope of work
and costs to reflect the agreed upon resolution. H &LP, in consultation with FHWA,
will identify the amount of federal participation in the agreed upon
resolution of the issue.
If mutual agreement is not reached, the agency and consultant may seek settlement
by arbitration or by litigation.
41
Exhibit K
Consultant Claim Procedures
The purpose of this exhibit is to describe a procedure regarding claim(s) on a consultant agreement. The following
procedures should only be utilized on consultant claims greater than $1,000. If the consultant's claim(s) are a total
of $1,000 or less, it would not be cost effective to proceed through the outlined steps. It is suggested that the
Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer negotiate a fair and reasonable price for the consultant's claim(s)
that total $1,000 or less.
This exhibit will outline the procedures to be followed by the consultant and the agency to consider a potential
claim by the consultant.
Step 1 — Consultant Files a Claim with the Agency Project Manager
If the consultant determines that they were requested to perform additional services that were outside of the
agreement's scope of work, they may be entitled to a claim. The first step that must be completed is the
request for consideration of the claim to the Agency's project manager.
The consultant's claim must outline the following:
• Summation of hours by classification for each firm that is included in the claim;
• Any correspondence that directed the consultant to perform the additional work;
• Timeframe of the additional work that was outside of the project scope;
• Summary of direct labor dollars, overhead costs, profit and reimbursable costs associated with
the additional work; and
• Explanation as to why the consultant believes the additional work was outside of the
agreement scope of work.
Step 2 — Review by Agency Personnel Regarding the Consultant's Claim for Additional Compensation
After the consultant has completed step 1, the next step in the process is to forward the request to the
Agency's project manager. The project manager will review the consultant's claim and will met with
the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer to determine if the Agency agrees with the claim. If
the FHWA is participating in the project's funding, forward a copy of the consultant's claim and the
Agency's recommendation for federal participation in the claim to the WSDOT Highways and Local
Programs through the Region Local Programs Engineer. If the claim is not eligible for federal
participation, payment will need to be from agency funds.
If the Agency project manager, Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer, WSDOT Highways and
Local Programs (if applicable), and FHWA (if applicable) agree with the consultant's claim, send a
request memo, including backup documentation to the consultant to either supplement the agreement,
or create a new agreement for the claim. After the request has been approved, the Agency shall write
the supplement and/or new agreement and pay the consultant the amount of the claim. Inform the
consultant that the final payment for the agreement is subject to audit. No further action in needed
regarding the claim procedures.
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit K
Revised 6/05
42
If the Agency does not agree with the consultant's claim, proceed to step 3 of the procedures.
Step 3 — Preparation of Support Documentation Regarding Consultant's Claim(s)
If the Agency does not agree with the consultant's claim, the project manager shall prepare a summary
for the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer that included the following:
• Copy of information supplied by the consultant regarding the claim;
Agency's summation of hours by classification for each firm that should be included in the
claim;
• Any correspondence that directed the consultant to perform the additional work;
• Agency's summary of direct labor dollars, overhead costs, profit and reimbursable costs
associated with the additional work;
Explanation regarding those areas in which the Agency does /does not agree with the
consultant's claim(s);
• Explanation to describe what has been instituted to preclude future consultant claim(s); and
• Recommendations to resolve the claim.
Step 4 — Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer Reviews Consultant Claim and Agency
Documentation
The Director of Pubic Works or Agency Engineer shall review and administratively approve or
disapprove the claim, or portions thereof, which may include getting Agency Council or
Commission approval (as appropriate to agency dispute resolution procedures). If the project
involves federal participation, obtain concurrence from WSDOT Highways and Local Programs
and FHWA regarding final settlement of the claim. If the claim is not eligible for federal
participation, payment will need to be from agency funds.
Step 5 — Informing Consultant of Decision Regarding the Claim
The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer shall notify (in writing) the consultant of their final
decision regarding the consultant's claim(s). Include the final dollar amount of the accepted claim
(s) and rationale utilized for the decision.
Step 6 — Preparation of Supplement or New Agreement for the Consultant's Claim(s)
The agency shall write the supplement and /or new agreement and pay the consultant the amount of the
claim. Inform the consultant that the final payment for the agreement is subject to audit.
43
Exhibit M -1(a)
Certification Of Consultant
Project No.
Local Agency
I hereby certify that I am ,co`�� and duly authorized
representative of the firm of AECOM Technical Services, Inc. whose address is
710 Second Avenue, Suite 1000, Seattle, WA 98104 and that neither I nor the above
firm I here represent has:
(a) Employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee, or other
consideration, any firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the
above CONSULTANT) to solicit or secure the AGREEMENT;
(b) Agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or retain the
services of any firm or person in connection with carrying out this AGREEMENT; or
Paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee
working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT) any fee, contribution, donation, or
consideration of any kind for, or in connection with, procuring or carrying out this AGREEMENT;
except as hereby expressly stated (if any);
(c)
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be available to the Washington State Department of
Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation in
connection with this AGREEMENT involving participation of Federal -aid highway funds, and is
subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
/9/3
Date
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit M -1(a)
Revised 6/05
44
Exhibit M -1(b)
Certification Of Agency Official
I hereby certify that I am the AGENCY Official of the Local Agency of City of Tukwila
Washington, and that the consulting firm or its representative has not been required, directly or indirectly as an
express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this AGREEMENT to:
(a) Employ or retain, or agree to employ to retain, any firm or person; or
(b) Pay, or agree to pay, to any firm, person, or organization, any fee, contribution, donation, or
consideration of any kind; except as hereby expressly stated (if any):
I acknowledge that this certificate is to be available to the Washington State Department of
Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in
connection with this AGREEMENT involving participation of Federal -aid highway funds, and is
subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
Date
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit M -1(b)
Revised 6/05
Signature
45
Exhibit M -2
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility
Matters - Primary Covered Transactions
I. The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its
principals:
A. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or
voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any federal department or agency;
B. Have not within a three -year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil
judgment rendered against them for commission or fraud or a criminal offense in connection with
obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (federal, state, or local) transaction or
contract under a public transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statues or commission of
embezzlement. theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false
statements, or receiving stolen property;
C. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental
entity (federal, state, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (I)
(B). of this certification; and
Have not within a three (3) year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more
public transactions (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default.
H. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this
certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
Consultant (Firm): AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
(Date) (Signatur President or Authorized Official of Consultant
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit M -2
Revised 6/05
46
Exhibit M -2 Attachment
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility
Matters - Primary Covered Transactions
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (ATS) performs thousands of contracts each year. From time to
time, occasions arise when ATS does not complete the performance of an awarded contract resulting
in its termination. These situations include (i) where a client is unsuccessful in securing funding for a
particular project that is then terminated, (ii) where a client terminates a contract for convenience, (iii)
where ATS ceases performance for nonpayment or other breach of contract in accordance with
contract terms, or (iv) for default.
Within the past three (3) years, ATS (i) has not failed to complete a contract where the other party to
such contract was not in breach unless the contract afforded ATS that right, and (ii) ATS has not had a
contract terminated by a client wherein that termination was ultimately determined to be other than for
convenience with the exception of the following instance:
a) In November of 2012, AECOM received a notice from the City of Sarasota, Florida, notifying
AECOM that it has terminated its contract with AECOM for the design of a sewer lift station
for default. AECOM disagrees with the termination and will look to contest it. Meanwhile,
AECOM is working with the City to resolve any issues in an amicable manner.
47
Exhibit M -3
Certification Regarding The Restrictions
of The use of Federal Funds for Lobbying
The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her
knowledge and belief, that:
1.No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to
any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal
agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member
of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal
grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the
extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan,
or cooperative agreement.
2.1f any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in
connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall
complete and submit Standard Fonn -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance
with its instructions.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this
transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making
or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who
fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and
not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall
require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts which
exceed $100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
Consultant (Firm): AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
( ate)
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit M -3
Revised 6/05
(Signature resident or Authorized Official of Consultant
48
Exhibit M -4
Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data
This is to certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the cost or pricing data (as defined in
section 15.401 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and required under FAR subsection 15.403 -4)
submitted, either actually or by specific identification in writing, to the contracting officer or to the
contracting officer's representative in support of Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Project
are accurate, complete, and current as of November 18, 2013 * *. This certification includes
the cost or pricing data supporting any advance agreements and forward pricing rate agreements between
the offeror and the Government that are part of the proposal.
Firm AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Name
Ci,geni 4,5 es4tp -- -tom/ 7;;45 //4rgy 4'1
Date of Execution*** / /
* Identify the proposal, quotation, request for price adjustment, or other submission involved,
giving the appropriate identifying number (e.g., RFP No.).
Insert the day, month, and year when price negotiations were concluded and price agreement
was reached.
**
* **
Insert the day, month, and year of signing, which should be as close as practicable to the date
when the price negotiations were concluded and the contract price was agreed to.
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit M -4
Revised 6/05
49
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NUMBER 21
TO
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT NUMBER 06 -019
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila,
Washington, herein -after referred to as the City ", and MI Group, hereinafter referred to as "the
Consultant ", in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified.
The City desires to supplement the agreement entered into with the Consultant and executed on,
February 23, 2006 and identified as Agreement No. 06 -019. All provisions in the basic
agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
1. Scope of Services, is hereby changed to include work described in Attachment B for On-
Call Construction Support services on the Tukwila Transit Center, Andover Park West
Street and Water Improvement project.
2. Payment, shall be amended as follows:
A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on
Exhibit "C" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant
shall not exceed $80,000 without express written modification of the Agreement signed
by the City. The maximum amount payable under this agreement as supplemented
inclusive of all fees and other costs is now $1,790,922.
3. Time for Performance, shall be amended as follows:
The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant
to this Agreement by December 31, 2014, unless an extension of such time is granted in
writing by the City.
DATED this
day of , 20
CITY OF TUKWILA CONSULTANT
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
By:
Printed Name: cku L ce u (1 e
Tide: 1 "e-C-4-0 t/ 11 / 17 2.015
50
IBI
GROUP
ATTACHMENT B
Scope of Work
Agreement No 06 -019; City Project No 90610402, 98810404, 99840105
Tukwila Transit Center; Andover
Park West & Water Improvement
Project
On -Call Construction Support
Services
Prepared for City of Tukwila
by IBI Group
November 18, 2013
51
IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER; ANDOVER PARK WEST & WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
ON -CALL CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES
Prepared for City of Tukwila
Document Control Page
CLIENT:
City of Tukwila
PROJECT NAME:
REPORT TITLE:
Tukwila Transit Center; Andover Park West & Water Improvement
Project
On-CaII Construction
Support Services
IBI REFERENCE:
24735
VERSION:
DIGITAL MASTER:
[File Location]
ORIGINATOR:
Erin King
REVIEWER:
Lee Ann Mangin
AUTHORIZATION:
Paul Lavallee
CIRCULATION LIST:
HISTORY:
Final to Client
November 18, 2013
52
IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER; ANDOVER PARK WEST & WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
ON -CALL CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES
Prepared for City of Tukwila
Table of Contents
Introduction 1
Task 16: Construction Administration Support Services 1
Assumptions 1
Work Activities 1
November 18, 2013
53
IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER; ANDOVER PARK WEST & WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
ON -CALL CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES
Prepared for City of Tukwila
Introduction
This scope of work includes services to provide on -call construction phase support services on
design and architectural fronts, defined in the following sections and necessary to accomplish
the work by the City.
The following scope describes the work to be conducted and assumptions and deliverables to be
provided. The term "Consultant" or "Consultant Team" refers to IBI Group and its team of sub -
consultants including KPFF, Shannon & Wilson, Nakano Landscape Architects, and Tres West
Engineers. "City" refers to the City of Tukwila, the client organization responsible for the project.
Task 16: Construction Administration Support Services
This supplemental agreement includes services related to On -Call Construction Support
services. The Consultant conducts these services at the request of the City to support
construction of the project. Support services shall include but not be limited to architectural,
urban and landscape design and aesthetic elements of the project as well as environmental
hazards, geotechnical review and other specialty expertise by the design team. Special
Provisions sections are included in the work activities below for reference to more detailed
information about the support services and areas of work to be performed.
Assumptions
Work under this task shall consist of providing support to the City's Construction Team during
the construction phase for the project as described below. We will work under the direction of the
City's Construction Project Manager.
Work Activities
16.1 Project Management
Work under this task includes the following:
• Consultant shall submit monthly invoicing and progress reports
• Consultant shall execute all sub - consultant supplemental agreements
• Consultant shall coordinate and manage all sub - consultant work, including ad hoc
meetings as necessary to resolve RFIs (Requests for Information)
• Consultant shall communicate proactively with the City including calls and ad hoc
coordination meetings as necessary
• Consultant shall conduct all necessary quality management activities such as
checking and coordinating all design reviews and review of all submittals to the City
16.2 Submittal Review
The following design elements identified within the Special Provisions for this project require
specialized review and approval:
November 18, 2013
54
IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER; ANDOVER PARK WEST & WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
ON -CALL CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES
Prepared for City of Tukwila
• Shop drawings of architectural and landscape architectural elements related to
custom transit shelter, transit center planters, and transit plaza areas (see Sections
8 -26, 8 -27, 8 -30 through 8 -53)
• Submittals for all attachments to the transit shelters including but not limited to
electrical and communication access points, CCTV cameras, light fixtures.
• Samples for architectural and landscape architecture elements related to custom
transit shelters (see Sections 8 -26, and 8 -30 through 8 -53)
• Selection of stone features for the transit plaza areas (see Section 8 -27)
• Mockups of architectural elements related to custom transit shelter, transit center
planters, and transit center features (see Sections 8 -26, 8 -27, 8 -30 through 8 -53)
Additional civil, electrical and structural submittals as requested by City's
Construction Project Manager
16.3 Pre - installation Conferences
The following products are identified within the Special Provisions for this project as requiring
pre - installation /pre- construction conferences with the City and Contractor(s):
• Architectural elements related to customer transit shelter, transit center planters,
and transit center features (see Sections 8 -30, 8 -32, 8 -33, 8 -35, 8 -50, 8 -51, and 8-
53)
Work under this task may include the following:
• Attendance at pre - installation conferences with installers, manufacturers or
fabricators as required for the particular activity to review progress or other
construction activities, preparations and coordination requirements
• Coordination with City on scheduling of pre - installation conferences, review of
Contractor's proposed attendees, agenda, and participation in the meeting
16.4 General Construction Support Services
Work under this task shall include performing construction support for the architectural, urban
and landscape design, and other engineering support services as requested during construction.
Specific items of work may include the following:
• Responding to Contractor's requests for Information
• Provide design review and recommendations on proposed Contractor change
orders, substitutions or other construction changes
• Provide design support and recommendations for Field Directives to the City
Construction Team
• Review tests results to confirm compliance with requirements specified when
requested by the City to assist with solutions to problems.
• Review shop and site mockups to demonstrate aesthetic effects, verify material
selections from Sample submittals, to review installation coordination and to confirm
compliance with specified installation requirements
• Support the City in preparation for Disputes Review Board meetings as needed.
• Support the City in schedule review and updates, as needed.
• Support the City in public outreach, as needed.
November 18, 2013
55
IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER; ANDOVER PARK WEST & WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
ON -CALL CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES
Prepared for City of Tukwila
16.5 Construction Meetings
The Consultant will attend various Project related meetings for this task. Work under this task
may include the following:
• Attend the Pre - construction Conference
• Attend coordination and progress meetings with the Contractor, City staff, project
stakeholders or utility providers, when requested by the City
• Attend construction meetings and field reviews when requested by the City
16.6 Deliverables
Items provided by the Consultant may include:
Documentation from site meetings, changes, RFI responses and field directives
• Sketches and drawings to support change requests
November 18, 2013
56
EXHIBIT C
Fee
The Consultant shall provide on -call services on a Time and Materials basis for the not -to-
exceed amount of $80,000. The Consultant shall invoice the on -call construction support
services for each of the City's project numbers to comply with the funding sources of the project.
November 18, 2013
57
58
TO:
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director/ -.
BY: Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager
DATE: November 22, 2013
SUBJECT: Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge
Project No. 90510403, Contract No. 07 -123 with KPFF
Supplement No. 10
ISSUE
Approve Supplement No. 10 with KPFF for the TUC Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge design in the
amount of $221,419.54.
BACKGROUND
Since 2005, KPFF has been under contract with the City to design the Pedestrian /Bicycle
Bridge over the Green River. A Type, Size, and Location (TS &L) report was approved by
Council in 2011 with the direction to design a Twin Tied Arch bridge with no accommodation for
a future bridge crossing over West Valley Highway. Since then, the design has proceeded
through the 30% level. Staff continued efforts to obtain grant funds to build the project and
earlier this year an award from the WSDOT Regional Mobility Office was made in the amount of
$6.87M over two state biennial budget cycles. These funds were originally identified to complete
right of way acquisition and construction but a change at the Regional Mobility office allows
these funds to be spent on any phase of the project.
DISCUSSION
As the design has progressed and consultation with outside permitting agencies has
commenced, additional work beyond the original scope of work has been identified that must be
completed in order to obtain all required environmental approvals and non -city permits. For
example: Department of Fish and Wildlife has requested the City consider redesigning portions
of the east bridge landing to preserve two large Douglas firs; the U.S. Coast Guard maintains
some jurisdiction over the Green River and maintains permit approval, necessitating additional
work; and the King County Flood Control District (KCFCD) and Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) require additional study to document the project does not
negatively impact river hydraulics. This additional work (task 5 and 6) adds approximately $44K
to the fee.
The original scope of work did not include a right -of -way acquisition phase. With the WSDOT
Regional Mobility grant award, this project has funding to proceed with acquiring the necessary
property. This supplemental agreement adds the negotiation and acquisitions as a separate
task. Should the City end up in contracted negotiations or need to pursue acquisition through
eminent domain, additional scope and fee may be required. Discussions with one affected
property owner, the Riverview Plaza office site, have been challenging. Staff originally
requested right of entry to conduct surveying in mid -2012. At this time, the owner has not
granted the City the right to enter onto the property and is concerned with the impacts. This
scope of work includes additional design efforts to study more bridge landing and trail
w: \pw eng \projects \a - rw & rs projects \tuc ped bicycle bridge (90510403) \info memo supp #10 final design kpff 11- 25- 13.docx
59
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
connection options on and around the property. The fee associated with these two related tasks
(task 3 and 8) is about $131K.
Lastly, a small amount of additional work, administration for the new work and extended
contract time is required to supplement the original scope of work and fee in the amount of
about $47K. A small amount of additional survey work is required (task 2) to support the design
and additional civil design (task 4) is required for necessary wall design and coordination with
utilities and WSDOT. The additional scope and fee will complete the design, environmental
permitting and right -of -way acquisition (unless protracted negotiations or eminent domain
proceedings are ultimately required) for the TUC Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge project.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The $130,845 associated with the ROW acquisition is budgeted in 2014 in the draft CIP sheet
(attached). The remainder of the additional fee is not budgeted in the design phase but funds
from the ROW phase in the amount of $90,574 can be reallocated to the design phase. The
WSDOT Regional Mobility Grant reimbursable amount is $147,613.03, with a required 33%
match of $73,806.51.
RECOMMENDATION
Council is being asked to approve Supplement No. 10 to Contract No. 07 -123 with KPFF in the
amount of $221,419.54 and consider this item at the December 9, 2013 Committee of the
Whole Meeting and subsequent Special Meeting that same night.
Attachments: Contract 07 -123 Supplemental Agreement No. 10
Draft CIP Sheet
W:1PW EngIPROJECTSIA- RW & RS Projects\TUC Ped Bicycle Bridge (90510403)IINFO MEMO Supp #10 Final Design KPFF 11- 25- 13.docx
60
,== Washington Slate
-/r itaparimont Twassportalicsi
Supplemental Agreement
pp g
Number 10
Organization and Address
KPFF Consulting Engineers
1601 Fifth Ave, Suite 1600
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone:
Original Agreement Number
07 -123 (k)
Project Number
05 -RWO3
Execution Date
Completion Date
12/31/2014
Project Title
Tukwila Urban Center, Ped/Bicycle Bridge PSE
New Maximum Amount Payable
$ 1,833,856.32
Description of Work
Modification of existing contract for incorporation of additional tasks, as identified in the Exhibit A -1 Scope of
Work.
The Local Agency of the City of Tukwila
desires to supplement the agreement entered into with KPFF Consulting Engineers
and executed on and identified as Agreement No. 07 -123
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read:
See Exhibit A -1, Scope of Work_
11
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for
completion of the work to read: Contract completion date is extended to December 31 7014
111
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows:
This supplement increases the contract value by S771 419 39 increasing the previously authorized Maximum
Amount Payable of S1 617 436 93 to S1 833 856 17
as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement.
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces
below and return to this office for final action.
By: David K McMullen, PR By: City of Tukwila
DOT Form 140 -063 EF
Revised 9/2005
Consultant Signature Approving Authority Signature
Date
61
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 1
Exhibit A -1
Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge
Supplement No. 11 - Additional Hydraulic, Surveying, Permitting,
and Right of Way Acquisition Services
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
KPFF is currently under contract with the City of Tukwila (City) for the Plans,
Specifications and Cost Estimate (PSE) Phase of the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian
and Bicycle Bridge project. This supplement provides additional services related to:
• Incorporation of Trail Alignment Alternatives and Parking Lot
(re)Configuration, including associated Surveying and Utility Locating
• United States Coast Guard (USCG) Permitting Requirements outside the
initial scope
• Hydraulic Analysis of the Green River, and associated Surveying
• Permitting Assistance associated with Design and Construction of an
undercrossing of the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) at the Tukwila
Commuter Rail Station
• Right of Way Acquisition, and associated Surveying
• Management and Coordination associated with incorporation of the above
listed modifications into the project.
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The overall objectives of this supplement include:
• Obtain technical data necessary for completion of the PSE Phase
• Acquire right of way necessary for project construction
• Obtain USCG bridge permits, and
• Obtain UPRR permits for and undercrossing at the Tukwila Commuter Rail
Station.
During and /or at the conclusion of the PSE Phase, the City can exercise the option to
supplement KPFF's contract to include design documents for the undercrossing at
the Tukwila Commuter Rail Station or for support during the Construction
Management Phase.
62
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 2
PROJECT TEAM
This supplement includes effort by the following project design team members:
Prime Consultant
Structural Engineering
Civil Engineering
Surveying
Environmental and Permitting Services
River Hydraulics
Right of Way Acquisition
KPFF Consulting Engineers
KPFF Consulting Engineers
KPFF Consulting Engineers
KPG Inc.
Landau Associates
Watershed Science 85 Engineering
Universal Field Services
63
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 3
SCOPE OF WORK
The following is a scope of work for additional hydraulic, surveying, permitting, and
right of way acquisition services in support of this project's PSE Phase. In addition to
the basic services scoped in this document, the Consultant has included additional
services that can be performed at the City's request.
TASK NO. 1.0 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
Task No. 1.10 - Monthly Invoices and Coordination
PSE design team members prepare monthly invoices for work completed,
which are then compiled by KPFF into a single invoice for the City. This task
incorporates efforts for including Universal Field Services and Watershed
Science 85 Engineering in this process. This task also includes incorporation of
changes made in this supplement to the design team invoices.
Because the City has a separate funding source for Right of Way services,
charges associated with this task will be identified separately on invoices.
KPFF does not anticipate providing a separate invoice for Right of Way services.
Task No. 1.20 - Design Team Supplemental Agreement Preparation
KPFF shall prepare contracts for Universal Field Services and Watershed
Science 85 Engineering, and supplemental contracts for KPG, Inc. and Landau
Associates.
Task No. 1.30 - Project Schedule Updates
The PSE Phase project design schedule shall be revised to incorporate the
modifications made by this supplement. The schedule shall continue to be
updated on an as needed basis.
Task No. 1.40 - Design Team Meetings and Coordination
The consultant team anticipates needing an additional six (6) internal meetings
to coordinate modified project tasks and incorporate scope changes into the
project design.
Additionally, KPFF will perform general coordination and be the main point of
contact for the multidiscipline team. KPFF will collect and disseminate
information for the team.
Task No. 1.50 - Project Team Meetings with City
An additional two (2) meetings with the City will be required to coordinate
tasks associated with this scope of work.
64
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 4
Deliverables:
• Monthly progress reports and invoices
• As- needed Project Schedule Updates
• Team meetings
o Participation in internal consultant team meetings (assume 6
meetings)
o Participation in project meetings with the City (assume 2
meetings)
65
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 5
TASK No. 2.0 - TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY
The following is a scope of work for additional survey items needed as design
proceeds on this project.
KPG has included time and expense for project meetings, management of
surveying and drafting efforts, professional review and quality control in our
proposal.
Task No. 2.10 - Additional Survey and Mapping
Subtask No. 2.11 - Locate Catch Basins
Locate catch basins in west side of West Valley Highway.
Subtask No. 2.12 - Extend Survey of Green River Trail
The survey of the Green River Trail shall be extended northerly
approximately 100 -feet to the limit of proposed improvements.
66
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 6
TASK No. 3.0 - ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Task No. 3.10 - Survey at Riverview Plaza Parking Lot
KPG shall provide the field survey and mapping to augment the Riverview Plaza
parking lot, including studies and alignments of alternative routes.
Subtask No. 3.11 - Utility Locating
A separate cost for private utility locating services has been included, which
assumes 24 hours of underground utility sensing and locating.
Task No. 3.20 - Walkway Section/ Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies
KPG shall provide alternative layouts and improvements to the Riverview Plaza
property, including parking lot reconfiguration. This work will include
additional design studies for proposed improvements, meetings with property
owners of Riverview Plaza, and coordination with the property owner's
consultants.
KPFF civil will review alignment alternatives and parking configuration /
reconfiguration, and attend coordination meetings with property owners and
City staff.
Deliverables
• Trail Alignment Alternatives and Selected Alternative Plan
(including conceptual parking lot reconfigurations.)
KPFF civil shall provide cost estimates for two (2) alternative alignments,
compare the estimated costs to the current alignment, and identify changes to
project cost as a result of alignment revisions.
Task No. 3.30 - 30% Plans
KPFF civil will progress selected alternative alignment to 30% design.
Anticipated work includes preparation of new plan sheets for horizontal
alignment, vertical alignment, site preparation, utility relocation, storm
drainage, pavement markings and signing, and paving plans.
Task No. 3.40 Update Storm Drainage Report
Storm Drainage report will need to be revised to assess impacts due to revised
alignment. This may trigger stormwater detention requirements, and will also
change basin delineation.
Task No. 3.50 - Update Cost Estimate
Cost estimate will be revised to integrate quantities for preferred alignment.
67
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 7
TASK No. 4.0 - CIVIL ENGINEERING
Task No. 4.10 - Grading and Paving
KPFF shall develop preliminary wall profile for grading of sidewalk facilities for
Christensen Road, adjacent to Riverview Plaza, to accommodate grading. Work
will include assessment of retaining wall type, and then development of PS&E
for selected retaining wall.
KPFF shall develop preliminary wall profiles for miscellaneous walls along the
pedestrian facility west of the west bridge landing to accommodate grading.
Wall type is anticipated to match selected wall type chosen for the Christensen
Road section.
Task No. 4.20 - Utilities
KPFF shall coordinate with SPU to show the Cedar River Pipeline No. 4 on the
basemap. Facilities will be located based on existing structures. Limits of
concrete encasement will be shown. Encasement for wet end located by
centerline of original alignment of West Valley Highway will be located by
offsets from west end, since West Valley Highway alignment has been
redefined. Records research will be done with WSDOT for SR181 (West Valley
Highway) to define any improvements done to protect record gaps between
protection for river crossing and protection for SR181.
68
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 8
TASK No. 5.0 - ENVIRONMENTAL AND PERMITTING SERVICES
Landau Associates will provide supplemental environmental and permitting
services for this project. The scope of services is based on discussions with and
information provided by the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) regarding bridge permitting
requirements, a City of Tukwila (City) Shoreline Planner and a Washington State
Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Area Habitat Biologist regarding impacts
to trees adjacent to the Green River, and 30 percent plan review documentation
referencing an illumination study associated with proposed bridge lighting.
Project Background
The City plans to construct a pedestrian /bicycle pathway between the
intersection of Baker Boulevard and Christensen Road on the west side of the
Green River to the west shoulder of West Valley Highway. During our initial
site review to support project scoping in 2011, it was determined that the
Green River was not a Section 10 Rivers and Harbors Act navigable waterway
subject to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) regulatory oversight. After
further research and initial agency coordination during contract review,
however, it was determined that the Green River is considered a navigable
waterway subject to USCG bridge permit (General Bridge Act). The initial effort
for addressing the USCG bridge permit application anticipated that the
application would be made with the JARPA based on review of the Governor's
Office of Regulatory Assistance (ORA) website in 2011, which would be a
typical and cost - effective approach, particularly since preparation of the JARPA
is included in the design teams approved scope of work.
Based on recent discussion with the USCG, a project- specific decision is being
made to require a Navigation Survey as part of the permitting process. The
Navigation Survey is identified as a recommended, but not required, element of
the bridge permit application in the USCG Bridge Permit Application Guide.
The purpose of the Navigation Survey is to identify the type and clearance
requirements for watercraft that utilize the waterway in the project area. In
addition, the USCG has indicated that the application should include a cover
letter formatted to the USCG Bridge Permit Application Guide, which is
presented similar to a checklist form.
In addition, pre- application coordination with a WDFW Area Habitat Biologist
and a City Shoreline planner has identified the need to assess impact to
riparian vegetation on the 16113 West Valley Highway property as a result of
the proposed project. The City shoreline code specifically references retention
of non - invasive trees, particularly those that provide shading to the river. A
project survey has been completed to identify tree location and diameter,
however tree height and crown spread needed to determine extent of shading
has not been determined. Furthermore, the project survey provides
identification of trees as either conifer or deciduous, but does not appear to
indicate species needed as part of determination of invasive species. Landau
Associates understands support is needed in determining characteristic of
trees in the vicinity of the proposed project.
69
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 9
Bridge lighting concepts are indicated as being under consideration in the 30
percent design review submittal, and the submittal acknowledges further study
is needed to determine how proposed lighting would impact the river and
surrounding properties. The results of such a study will be required to be
incorporated into SEPA and shoreline permitting. Determination of lighting
impacts is not included in Landau Associates existing contract, and it is
understood that support in completing the study will be required.
Task No. 5.10 - USCG Navigation Survey and Bridge Permit Application
The purpose of this task is to conduct the required Navigation Survey and
prepare the General Bridge permit application materials to USCG standards.
To conduct the Navigation Survey, Landau Associates will contact local
waterway users /managers to determine the type and characteristic of
watercraft common to the stretch of the Green River affected by the proposed
project. Contact with local waterway user groups /managers will include:
• City officials
• City Chamber of Commerce
• WDFW
• USACE
• Port of Seattle and select number of tenants.
Landau Associates will document findings into a memorandum format that will
include a summary of methods and results. Landau will also prepare the
application cover letter formatted to the USCG Bridge Permit Application
Guide.
Landau will prepare draft documentation for review and comment by KPFF and
the City, and then final documentation.
Assumptions:
• No team meetings or onsite meetings with waterway user groups
are included in this scope of services.
• Contact with no more than three Port tenants will be required as
part of the Navigation Survey.
• Waterway user group survey will be limited to email /phone
correspondence.
• Vessel traffic from the Port does not pass downstream of the
Duwamish River Turning Basin (i.e., approximate River Mile 6).
Deliverables:
• An electronic (MS Word) copy of the draft Navigation Survey
memorandum and application cover letter.
• An electronic (Adobe PDF) and one paper copy of the final
Navigation Survey and application cover letter.
70
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 10
Task No. 5.20 - Tree Assessment
Landau Associates will conduct a tree assessment on the 16113 West Valley
Highway property within 50 feet of the proposed bridge alignment and bridge
landing. For the assessment, Landau Associates will identify the species,
approximate height and crown spread, and general age class and health of
trees identified on project survey. Landau will also conduct an assessment of
the approximate extent of shade provided by identified trees. The shade
assessment will be based on analysis of the height and crown spread of trees
and altitude of the sun at 8:00 a.m., 10:00 a.m., and noon, on the Winter
Solstice (i.e., altitudes with potential to provide the maximum extent of shade
over the Green River). The extent of shade for each identified tree will be
modeled using AutoCAD software.
Landau will amend the project survey to identify tree species, required tree
protection zone, approximate extent of shading provided by identified trees.
Methods and results of the tree assessment will be summarized in shoreline
permitting documentation included in Landau Associates' existing contract.
Assumptions:
• Determination of age class will be made following shoreline
permitting requirements (i.e. young, mature, over mature).
• Tree assessment field effort will require a single site visit by two
Landau Associates staff members and will take no more than 8
hours to complete.
• The City will arrange for any necessary right of entry to complete
the tree assessment.
• Landau Associates will be provided with AutoCAD survey files,
including LandXML files.
Deliverables:
• Draft and final tree assessment documentation to be incorporated
into shoreline permitting documentation included under existing
contract.
Task No. 5.21 - Biological Assessment
KPFF civil engineers shall establish revised bridge alignments to
accommodate WDFW request to save two large Douglas -Fir trees located
along the east bank of the Green River. Two alignments will be created, one
to clear only the tree located furthest to the south, and another to clear
both large trees.
71
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 11
Task No. 5.30 - Lighting Study Support
Landau Associates will provide support to KPFF in developing the lighting
study associated with proposed bridge illumination. Because lighting concepts
are under development, the needs for completing the lighting study are yet to
be determined. As a result, Landau Associates is including a level of effort to
include no more than 2 hours of Associate, 16 hours of Senior, and 8 hours of
Senior CAD support as a placeholder budget for this to -be- determined scope.
As requirements of the lighting study are developed, Landau Associates will
communicate the anticipated level of effort associated with delegated tasks and
will identify any need for budget modification when the scope is better defined.
Deliverables:
• To be determined
72
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 12
TASK No. 6.0 - HYDRAULICS
Watershed Science 85 Engineering (WSE) shall provide hydraulic support to the
bridge design as necessary, and shall perform a no -rise evaluation. Specific tasks
proposed for this investigation are described below.
Task No. 6.10 - Site Inspection and Meeting
WSE will visit the site of the proposed bridge. It is assumed access will be
available along the east bank of the river, at the present homestead on West
Valley Highway (WVH) and where the east abutment and connection to WVH
will be located. Budget is also included for one meeting with KPFF staff and /or
City personnel as needed.
KPFF civil engineers shall Meet with City Shoreline Permit representative and
discuss city requirements for establishment of survey needs, river cross
sections and 100 -year flood plain delineations necessary for permit review.
Task No. 6.20 - Review Existing Data
WSE will obtain the latest King County 100 -year HEC -RAS hydraulic model of
the Green River, and become familiar with the model layout and assumptions
in the reach of the proposed bridge. WSE will also obtain the latest project plan
set from KPFF and any other data necessary to adequately represent the layout
and elevations of the bridge alternative(s). Any basemap or topographic data
acquired or collected by KPFF will also be provided to WSE.
Task No. 6.30 - Update Baseline Hydraulic Model
Available topographic data will be used, either from County LiDAR or KPFF
surveys, to update the hydraulic model at the site of the proposed bridge.
Additional cross - section(s) will be added to the model to establish reliable
hydraulic results at this location. Channel bathymetry from upstream and
downstream cross - sections will be interpolated and adjusted to establish
reasonable bed data for the river channel. Roughness values at the new cross -
sections(s) will be selected based upon the site visit and such that the
established upstream profile in the existing King County modeling is not
changed significantly.
Task No. 6.40 - Simulate Bridge Alternatives
Budget is allowed for simulating and evaluating two distinct alternatives for
the proposed bridge design, under 100 -year flood conditions. These can either
be evaluated simultaneously as part of an alternatives selection process, or as
a single preferred alternative followed if necessary by a revised design should
the original simulation result in unacceptable rise or impact.
73
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 13
Task No. 6.50 - Evaluate Impacts
WSE will process the results of the model runs, including determining the
design water surface profile and the with - project profiles under each bridge
alternative. WSE will consult with and present the results of the model runs to
KPFF. As budget allows, slight refinements to each bridge alternative will be
tested with the model, as needed to establish no -rise.
Task No. 6.60 - Summary Memorandum
A brief technical memorandum or letter will be drafted to summarize the
hydraulic analysis and the modeling results. Assuming the results
demonstrate no -rise, this will also be reported in a format as needed by the
City of Tukwila. Upon KPFF review and comment on the draft memo, a final
document will be prepared and submitted.
Task No. 6.70 - Survey for Hydraulics
KPG shall provide the following survey tasks related to river hydraulics:
Subtask No. 6.71 - River Cross Sections
Mapping shall be provided at the proposed river crossing location. This
information will be provided to the hydraulics consultant for incorporation
into the hydraulic model, and to generate cross sections. One (1) day of 3-
man field crew is allocated for this task. KPG will survey 2 sections for the
bridge, one south and one north of the proposed crossing. The northerly
cross section will be near the storm drain outfall at the north end of the
Nelson Parcel. Shots for an additional cross section or along the toe of the
bank can be obtained if time permits.
Subtask No. 6.72 - Convert 85 Add FEMA 100 Year Flood Line to Base Map
Placement of the 100 year flood plain shall be established as defined by
FEMA mapping in the base map correlated to the project datum. No field
work is anticipated in this effort. 100 year flood plain will be obtained from
current Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), or other available resource.
Task No. 6.80 - Establish 100 -Year Floodplain (KPFF Civil)
KPFF civil engineers shall obtain the 100 -year floodplain elevation based on
FEMA mapping and cross sectional data on the Green River, and convert
data to current survey datum. The FEMA floodplain elevation shall be
shown per FEMA river section data on Nelson Parcel. The FEMA floodplain
elevation of Riverview Plaza site shall be shown. KPFF shall also work with
the City to clarify applicability of FEMA floodplain elevation for the
Riverview Plaza site, as FEMA mapping does not show the current levee
around the site.
74
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 14
TASK NO. 7.0 - NOT USED
TASK No. 8.0 - RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION
It is assumed federal funds are participating in the project, particularly the Right
of Way phase, therefore Universal Field Services, Inc. (UFS) will complete all Right
of Way services in accordance with the City of Tukwila (City) and Washington
State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) approved Right of Way Acquisition
Procedures, the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisitions Policies Act (URA), WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines - Section 25
(Right of Way Procedures), and the Washington Administrative Code (WAC 468-
100) state Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition.
The project primarily consists of business use properties. Based on schematic
drawings and exhibits, and discussions with KPFF, it is assumed up to eight (8)
separate tax parcels (includes City of Tukwila) will require various real property
rights, as shown in Table A. It is assumed there will be one (1) residential
occupant displaced by this project. According to the City, the owner (Nelson) of
the residential site recently purchased another residence, possibly because of the
pending project. Relocation eligibility and entitlements are subject to discussions
with the City and the owner. This scope of work will assume the property owner is
displaced by the project. Additional parcels or real property rights other than
those shown in Table A will require an amendment to this scope of work and
related fee estimate. Right of Way plans are not available for review and use at
this time.
This scope of work is based on the following:
• Discussions with the City's design team KPFF.
• Recent tour of the project limits.
• Review of limited public on -line information (mapping / ownership
information).
• Preliminary Schematic Drawing and Exhibits - Right of Way plans not
available.
Task No. 8.10 - Preparation and Administration
Discuss, strategize and plan overall process with the City, KPFF and UFS staff.
Attend project kickoff meeting and up to six (6) progress meetings at the City's
office. Progress meetings can be facilitated by conference calling if preferred.
Provide up to twelve (12) monthly progress reports indicating the work
completed for the invoiced month, anticipated work for the following month,
and identify issues requiring the City's input or assistance. UFS will provide
sample acquisition and relocation documents for the City's review and approval
for use. The City's pre- approved forms will be used when provided. When
appropriate, prepare parcel files to include fair offer letters, acquisition and
ancillary documents, a standard diary form indicating all contacts with
owner(s), and other items necessary for negotiations.
75
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 15
Deliverables:
• Attend Project Kickoff Meeting - City office
• Attend six (6) Progress Meetings
• Provide twelve (12) Progress Reports
• Coordinate City approval of Acquisition and Relocation forms for
project use
• Prepare parcel acquisition files for negotiations
Task No. 8.20 - Title /Ownership Review
Subtask No. 8.21 - UFS Title /Ownership Review
Obtain title reports from the City or KPFF and perform reviews of existing
right of way and ownership information. (If requested, UFS will order title
reports or any updates). Review special exceptions described in each title
report to determine the City's acceptance of title at closing. Provide the City
with a parcel summary memo listing ownerships, title exceptions, etc.
Deliverable:
• Prepare parcel summary memo listing ownerships, title
exceptions, etc.
Subtask No. 8.22 - Review 10 Additional Title Reports, Plot Easements
The original scope included 3 title reports comprised of two Riverview Plaza
parcels and the Nelson property. Additional title reports for KPG review
include:
• Four (4) title reports for two additional Riverview Plaza parcels,
City trail parcel, and the Seattle Public Utilities right of way. Any
plotable easements shall be added to the base map.
• Four (4) title reports for parcels at all four corners of the
intersection of Baker Boulevard and Andover Park East to verify
easement. Review of title reports to verify easements for
sidewalks that appear to extend past the right of way. Any
plotable easements shall be added to the base map.
• Two (2) title reports for parcels at the northwest and southwest
corners of the intersection of Baker Boulevard and Christensen
Road. Review title reports to verify easements for sidewalks that
appear to extend past the right of way. Any plotable easements
shall be added to the base map.
76
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 16
Task No. 8.30 - Data Collection and limit Identification
Subtask No. 8.31 - Determine Right of Way (KPG)
The east right of way line of West Valley Highway and the south boundary
of Seattle Public Utilities right of way south of the Nelson parcel will be
determined and added to the base map.
Subtask No. 8.32 - Right of Way Limits and Easements (KPFF Civil)
KPFF civil engineers will identify limits of right of way takes, as well as
temporary and permanent easements for the project. Limits will be
provided to the survey team, and the right of way acquisition team, for legal
description and exhibits for use by the right of way acquisition team.
Subtask No. 8.33 - Temporary Right of Entry /Access Permit
As part of the feasibility planning and preliminary design phase for the
project, the City and the consulting team may require temporary access to
gather pertinent information for investigational geotechnical, environmental
studies, hydrology, and land survey purposes, etc. It is intended Right of
Entry (ROE) Permits will be inclusive of all purposes as stated in this task.
It is assumed property owners will not be compensated for the temporary
grant of access and all properties will be left in the same condition as was
prior to entry. See Table A below for parcels requiring ROE Permits. The
City or KPFF will provide exhibits as attachments to each permit depicting
the extents of the ROE area.
Deliverable:
• Obtain one (1) Right of Entry Permit due to common ownership.
Subtask No. 8.34 - Legal Description and Exhibits for Acquisition
Eight (8) Legal descriptions and exhibits shall be prepared for right -of -way
acquisition.
• Prepare legal descriptions and graphic exhibits for temporary
easements as well as for permanent easements for each of the
four Riverview Plaza parcels (8 legal descriptions).
• Provide staking or painting of easements for viewing purposes.
Deliverables
• Updated Survey Project Base Map (two hardcopies, one electronic
copy)
• Copies of title reports
• Acquisition legal descriptions with graphic exhibits
77
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 17
Task No. 8.40 - Public Outreach
Assist City in preparation of a boilerplate "Introduction Informational Letter"
for delivery to all impacted property owners. The letter will describe the
purpose of the project, the project schedule, identify the City's consultants
(Engineering, Land Survey, Right of Way Acquisition /Appraisal) and the
purpose of each.
Deliverable:
• Boilerplate "Introduction Letter" for delivery by City to all
impacted property owners via regular U.S. Mail. UFS will assist
with delivery if needed.
Task No. 8.50 - Project Funding Estimate
UFS will sub - contract and manage completion of the Project Funding Estimate
(PFE) with our WSDOT approved project appraiser. Generally, the PFE is a tool
to be used for confirming estimated Right of Way costs and primarily for
consideration of utilizing the Appraisal Waiver process when the estimated
amount of just compensation to property owners is at or below the City's
WSDOT approved Appraisal Waiver limit and when the acquisition is
uncomplicated.
The PFE will be prepared in accordance with the City's WSDOT approved Right
of Way Acquisition procedures, and WSDOT's Local Agency Guidelines -
Section 25 (Right of Way Procedures). As part of the PFE, individual parcel
worksheets will be prepared to estimate the amount of just compensation
using comparable sales data and information obtained from project Right of
Way plans. Estimated amounts of just compensation from each parcel
worksheet will be entered into a project summary worksheet to include other
items of right of way related costs for review and use by the City. UFS will
coordinate with the City to determine which parcels qualify for the Appraisal
Waiver process.
Based on discussions with KPFF and review of preliminary schematic maps
and exhibits, up to eight (8) separate tax parcels may be impacted by the
project. Subject to completion of the PFE, it is assumed up to three (3)
Appraisal and Appraisal Review reports, and five (5) AOS worksheets may be
required. Total number of Appraisals is subject to change based on project
design revisions, confirmation of the larger parcels, complexity of each
acquisition, estimated amounts of just compensation determined in the PFE,
and upon requests from property owners when administrative offers are
presented. Upon completion of the PFE, UFS will coordinate with the City and
submit to WSDOT for review.
78
Exhibit A — Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge — Supplement #10
Page 18
It is recommended the City complete all Environmental Site Assessments (ESA)
prior to completion of the PFE to better estimate the potential related project
risks and costs. Estimated clean-up costs for contaminated parcels should be
ascertained prior to commencing Appraisal and Appraisal Reviews as
discussed in the Appraisal and Appraisal Review task.
Deliverables:
• Project Funding Estimate (PFE)
Task No. 8.60 - Relocation Plan
A relocation plan will be developed based on WSDOT's Right of Way Manual
and LAG Manual Section 25. According to the City, the owner (Nelson) of the
residential site recently purchased another residence, possibly because of the
pending project. Relocation eligibility and entitlements are subject to
discussions with the City and the owner. This scope of work assumes the
property owner is displaced by the project. It is assumed there will be one (1)
residential owner - occupant of a single family home displaced as a result of this
project (see Table A). UFS will develop a relocation plan resulting from
personal assessment interviews with the occupant(s) to determine their needs
for replacement sites; research potential replacement sites through discussions
with local real estate brokers, search the multiple listing service, local
newspapers, internet sites and publications; prepare initial pre -move
inventories and estimates for moving costs and relocation entitlements. Upon
completion of the Relocation plan, UFS will coordinate with the City and
submit to WSDOT for review and approval. If additional displacements are
subsequently discovered, the Relocation Plan will be amended by UFS and
submitted to WSDOT for review and approval. Additional relocations will
require an amendment to this scope of work and related fee estimate.
Deliverable:
• Relocation Plan
Subtask No. 8.61 - FHWA Funds Authorization for ROW
Shortly after the Right of Way Plans (prepared by KPFF), the PFE, and
Relocation Plan have been submitted to WSDOT and assuming NEPA
clearance has been obtained, the City would typically receive a letter from
FHWA through WSDOT Highways and Local Programs authorizing the use
of federal funds to acquire Right of Way. This letter of authorization is
required in order for the City to receive federal funding participation and
reimbursement for costs incurred with Appraisal, Appraisal Review,
Acquisition Negotiations, and Relocation Assistance services.
Deliverable:
• For informational purposes only
79
Exhibit A — Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge — Supplement #10
Page 19
Task No. 8.70 - Appraisal & Appraisal Review
Upon completion of the PFE and the City's receipt of authorization from FHWA
to use federal funds for Right of Way acquisition, UFS will coordinate with the
City to determine which parcels will require Appraisal and Appraisal Reviews.
Universal will subcontract and manage the Appraisal and Appraisal Review
process with appraisal firms previously qualified by WSDOT and certified by
the State of Washington. Appraisal reports will be completed by the Appraiser
discussed in the Project Funding Estimate task. The Appraisal and Appraisal
Review reports will be prepared in accordance with the Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practices, Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) Local Agency Guidelines, current WSDOT Right of
Way Manual (in particular, Chapters 4 and 5), and the URA.
Subject to completion of the PFE and City direction, it is assumed up to three
(3) Appraisal and Appraisal Review reports may be required. Total number of
Appraisals and Appraisal reviews is subject to change based on project design
revisions, confirmation of the larger parcels during the PFE process, complexity
of each acquisition, estimated amounts of just compensation determined in the
PFE and at the request of property owners when administrative offers are
presented.
UFS staff to attend all appraisal inspections (3 each) to ensure the property
owner understands the real property rights being appraised, ascertain what is
personal property and real property, and to help build the trust and rapport
needed during negotiations and to assist in reaching amicable agreements.
Appraisal scope of work and expenses thereof for specialty studies exclude:
hazardous materials research, testing and estimating (ESA Phase 1, 2, or 3),
parking modification estimates, irrigation modifications, business sign
relocates, etc.
UFS will prepare Administrative Offer Summary (AOS) worksheets for
qualifying parcels, in lieu of Appraisals. Offers to property owners that are
based on AOS worksheets are considered Administrative offers (see note
below) .
80
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 20
Note: For offers exceeding S 10,000 and less than 525,000, property owners
must be informed if the offer is not based on an Appraisal and that one will be
prepared if requested. If the property owner elects, an appraisal report
together with a corresponding appraisal review report must be completed and a
revised offer considered. This requirement may have an impact on the
approved right of way budget and project schedule.
Deliverables:
• Three (3) Appraisal reports in accordance with the Uniform
Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices, Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Local Agency Guidelines,
current WSDOT Right of Way Manual (in particular, Chapters 4
and 5), and the URA.
• Three (3) Appraisal Review reports in accordance with the
Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practices,
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Local
Agency Guidelines, current WSDOT Right of Way Manual (in
particular, Chapters 4 and 5), and the URA.
• Five (5) Administrative Offer Summary (AOS) worksheet
Task No. 8.80 - Acquisition Negotiation, Relocation and Closeout
Subtask No. 8.81 - Acquisition Negotiation
Acquire real property rights from up to eight (8) separate tax parcels
(including City of Tukwila) as shown in Table A below. Appraisals,
Appraisal Reviews, and AOS worksheets completed in the Appraisal 85
Appraisal Review task will be submitted to the City for written approval
establishing the amount of Just Compensation to the property owner.
Upon written approval from the City, UFS will prepare the offer package(s)
and promptly present offers to purchase all the required real property
interests and negotiate in good faith to reach a settlement with each
property owner(s). Offers will be presented in person when at all possible.
Negotiations will be conducted in accordance with statutory and regulatory
requirements and will include: Coordinate administrative settlement
approvals with the City; Negotiate as necessary with lien holders, assisting
escrow in the closing process; Prepare and maintain parcel files to include
fair offer letters, acquisition documents, a standard diary form indicating all
contacts with owner(s), and other items necessary for negotiations.
Negotiations shall not be deemed to have failed until at least three
significant meaningful contacts have been made and documented with each
owner and /or their representative through direct personal contacts. Out -
of -area owner(s) will be contacted by telephone and by certified mail. If
negotiations reach an impasse, UFS will provide the City with written
notification. The filing and cost of condemnation proceedings shall be the
responsibility of the City.
81
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 21
Deliverables:
• Acquisition Negotiation services with owners of up to eight (8)
separate tax parcels.
• Completed parcel files including necessary records of all Right of
Way Acquisition services.
Subtask No. 8.82 - Relocation
According to the City, the owner (Nelson) of the residential site recently
purchased another residence, possibly because of the pending project.
Relocation eligibility and entitlements are subject to discussions with the
City and the owner. This scope of work assumes the property owner is
displaced by the project. It is assumed there will be one (1) residential
owner - occupant of a single family home displaced as a result of this project.
Universal will provide Relocation Assistance and Advisory Services under
the guidelines of the federal URA, WSDOT LAG Manual - Section 25 and
the City's approved Policies and Procedures, as directed. Relocation
services are generally outlined as follows:
• Inform displaced occupants, in writing, of their potential displacement,
eligibility, entitlements, and provide an explanation of their relocation
benefits.
• Assist in search of replacement site(s).
• Assist displaced occupant(s) in filing relocation claims for payment.
• Maintain a current relocation diary for each displaced occupant.
• Maintain necessary records to support state audit of the relocation
services portion of the project.
Deliverables:
• Relocation Advisory and Assistance Services for one (1) residential
owner - occupant.
• Completed relocation assistance files.
Subtask No. 8.83 - Parcel Closeout - Escrow Closing
Upon securing required acquisition agreements, UFS will submit the
necessary acquisition documents and closing instructions to the designated
Title /Escrow Company. Work with the Title /Escrow Company in order to
obtain release documentation from the encumbrance(s) of public record
that are not acceptable to the City in order to provide clear title to the
property being acquired, subject to the City's title clearing guidelines. The
Escrow Company shall prepare and obtain the owner(s) signature on the
necessary closing documents. UFS will coordinate signatures on closing
documents for submittal to the City and payment(s) to the owner(s);
coordinate with the Escrow /Title Company in filing documents with King
County.
82
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 22
Deliverable:
• Deliver completed original Acquisition and Relocation parcel files
to the City
Task No. 8.90 - Right of Way Certification
Since there are federal funds participating in the project, Right of Way
Certification will be coordinated and completed through WSDOT. Right of Way
acquisition and relocation files will be prepared and completed to the
satisfaction of a WSDOT Right of Way review to support federal aid
participation. UFS will further coordinate right of way activities with WSDOT's
Local Agency Coordinator, Mr. Tom Boyd, as needed throughout the project.
Additional Work
If other tasks are required to be performed or there are changes in pertinent
information or if negotiations exceed the industry standard for a good faith
effort to negotiate (three "in- person" landowner contacts), UFS reserves the
right to request additional compensation as an equitable adjustment. UFS
shall not be responsible for delays caused beyond its control.
Assumptions:
The City / KPFF will provide the following:
• Exhibit maps to accompany Right of Entry Agreements
• Preliminary Commitments (Title Reports) for all parcels shown in
Table A. If requested, UFS will order title reports or any updates.
The title company will bill the City directly for each report.
• Approve designation of the escrow company used for this project.
The escrow company will bill the City directly for all escrow
services provided.
• Right of Way Plans and Drawings, Maps, Exhibits, Right of Way
Staking, etc., as necessary.
• The necessary Environmental Site Assessments prior to
commencing the PFE as discussed in the Project Funding
Estimate task.
• Legal descriptions in electronic format for all real property rights
to be acquired.
• Form approval, in electronic format, of all legal conveyance
documents prior to use (i.e. offer letters, purchase and sale
agreements, escrow instructions, easements, deeds, leases and
permits).
• Review and approval of all determinations of value, established by
the project appraisers. Provide written authorization prior to
offers being made to property owners.
83
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 23
• Review and approval of all relocation entitlements prior to
presentation to the displaced person.
• Payment of any and all compensation payments to property
owners, recording fees, relocation payments, legal services and
any incidental costs which may arise necessary to complete each
transaction.
• Send "Introduction Letters" to property owners as necessary.
84
Exhibit A - Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge - Supplement #10
Page 24
TABLE A - PARCEL ACQUISITION
No.
Tax Parcel No
Taxpayer / Owner
Current Use
Right of Entry
Permit
Total Fee
Simple
Partial Fee
Simple
Perm Trail
Easement
Temp. Const.
Easement
AR / AOS
(See Note 3)
1
000580 -0033
Nelson
Single Family
Residence
X
(See Note 1)
AR
2
252304 -9081
City of Tukwila
River Trail
To Be Determined
AOS
3a
252304-9039
(north)
BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC
Office Building
X
X
X
AR
3b
252304-9039
(south)
Office Building
X
X
4a
252304-9077
(north)
BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC
Office Building
To Be determined
AR
4b
252304-9077
(south)
Office Building
X
X
5
252304 -9078
BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC
Office Building
X
AOS
6
252304 -9048
Seattle Public Utilities
Water Utility
X
X
AOS
7
022310 -0040
Park East Real Estate LLC
Office /
X
X
AOS
8
022310 -0099
Andover Plaza LLC
Retail
X
X
AOS
Notes:
1. According to the City, the owner (Nelson) of the residential site recently purchased another residence, possibly
because of the pending project. Relocation eligibility and entitlements are subject to discussions with the City and
the owner.
2. It is assumed parcels 3a/ 3b and 4a/ 4b are correctly identified as larger parcels.
3. AR (Appraisal and Appraisal Review) / AOS (Administrative Offer Summery - in lieu of Appraisal)
EXHIBIT E -1
KPFF Consulting Engineers
CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
SUMMARY OF COST
Classification
Overhead (OH) Cost
OH Rate x DSC of
Fixed Fee (FF)
Reimbursables
FF Rate
Mileage
Reprographics
Subcontract
Subtotal
Total Hours X Rate
22.00 X
0.00 X
272.00 X
40.00 X
236.00 X
180.00 X
10.00 X
0.00 X
DSC Subtotal
Cost
$1,375.00
$0.00
$13,809.44
$1,730.80
$7,762.04
$6,334.20
$248.10
$0.00
$31,259.58
$31,259.58
$45,376.41
$31,259.58 $9,377.87
Subconsultant Costs (See Exhibit G)
$0.00
$135,405.53
GRAND TOTAL:
$221,419.39
Date: 11/20/2013
86
EXHIBIT G -1
KPG
CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
SUMMARY OF COST
Tukwila Urban Center - Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge, Supplement No. 10
Classification
Senior UD /L /E
P: roject;E /S
Designer UD /L/E
CAD Technician
Survey Crew
OfFice Admin
Total Hours X Rate = Cost
14.00 X $64.;90 = $908.60
6.00 X : $56.56 = $339.36
96.00 X $40.13 = $3,852.48
100.00 X $31.25 = $3,125.00
36.00 X $47.66`: = $1,715.76
0.00 X $23.08 = $0.00
DSC Subtotal $9,941.20
Overhead (OH) Cost
OH Rate x DSC of 163.17°x/0 $9,941.20 $16,221.50
Fixed Fee (FF)
FF Rate 30.00% $9,941.20 $2,982.36
Reimbursables
Utility Locates (LS - Add'I Survey & Mapping)
Title Reports (LS Add'I ROW Services)
Subcontract (Utility Locate)
(Blank) (Blank)
Subtotal
$640.00
$6,000.00
$120.00
$6,760.00
Subconsultant Total:
$35,905.06
Date: 11/20/2013
87
EXHIBIT G -1
Universal Field Services
CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
SUMMARY OF COST
Tukwila Urban Center - Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge, Supplement No. 10
Classification
Quality Assurance:
Project Manager
Acquisition Specialist
Relocation Specialist
Sr, Administrative Specialist
Overhead (OH) Cost
OH Rate x DSC of
Fixed Fee (FF)
FF Rate
Reimbursables
Mileage
Mapping, Photos Parking,
Parking, Printing, Long
Distance Calls
Project Funding Estimate
Appraisal Sub
Appraisal Review Sub
Administrative Fee
Subtotal
Total Hours X Rate
25.00 X
84.50 X
329.00 X
89.00 X
86.00 X
2.1;
0
5.0.00%
DSC Subtotal
Cost
$1,256.00
$3,549.00
$12,502.00
$3,382.00
$2,494.00
$23,183.00
$23,183.00
$23,183.00
piles x $0.565 /mile)
Strickland eischman & Hoss (LS)
Strickland Heischman & Hoss (LS)
The Granger, Company
2.0% (B &O Taxes, etc.)
$16,714.94
$6,954.90
$1,762.80
$450.00
$6,000.00
$11,000.00
$2,250.00
$385.00
$21,847.80
Subconsultant Total:
$68,700.64
Date: 11/20/2013
88
EXHIBIT G -1
Landau Associates
CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
SUMMARY OF COST
Tukwila Urban Center - Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge, Supplement No. 10
Classification
Overhead (OH) Cost
OH Rate x DSC of
Fixed Fee (FF)
FF Rate
Reimbursables
Mileage
Reprographics
Field Equipment/Supplies
(�) nf),
Subtotal
Total Hours X Rate
0.00 X
8.00 X
86.00 X
12.00 X
8.00 X
20.00 X
7.00 X
48.00 X
Cost
DSC Subtotal
$0.00
$376.00
$3,440.00
$432.00
$248.00
$500.00
$203.00
$1,152.00
$6,351.00
$6,351.00 $12,439.70
$6,351.00 $1,905.30
ssment)
dge Permitting)
essment)
$40.00
$14.77
$49.27
$104.04
Subconsultant Total:
$20,800.04
Date: 11/20/2013
89
EXHIBIT G -1
Wa hed Scie a 1=1 � n
CONSULTANT FEE DETERMINATION
SUMMARY OF COST
Tukwila Urban Center - Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge, Supplement No. 10
Classification
Overhead (OH) Cost
OH Rate x DSC of
Fixed Fee (FF)
Reimbursables
FF Rate
Mileage
Reprographics
Subcontract
Subtotal
ter
Total Hours X Rate
7.00 X
32.00 X
0.00 X
38.00 X
0.00 X
2.00 X
Cost
DSC Subtotal
$3,365.25
$3,365.25
$448.48
$1,726.46
$0.00
$1,153.22
$0.00
$37.09
$3,365.25
$5,605.17
$1,009.58
$19.78
$19.78
Subconsultant Total:
$9,999.78
Date: 11/20/2013
90
2,1 *t.
2.12'.
rate catch basins in west side of W. valley I- Iwy'..
:tend survey of Green River Trail
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Survey at Riverview Plaza Parking Lot
Utility Locating
Walkway Section) Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies
Trail ReaI nmest Alternatives For Riverview Plaza
Riverview frontage f property studies
Meetings for Riverview Plasa property owner coordinattan.
Alternative alignments schematic cast estimate comparison
30% Plans
Site Preparation
Utilities
Storrn Drainage and Grading
Paving Plans `.
Pavement Marking Plans <
Update Storm Drainage Report
Update Cost Estimate
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
CIVIL (KPFF)
Grading and Paving.
Utilities
$0
$0
$0
$0
$279
$279
$838
$2,566
$344
$2,057
$1,867
$2,845
$2,057
$2,057
$5,760
$2,566
$23,516
$0
$860
$951
$1,811
$6,640
$3,806
$0
$5,105
$3,168
$1,848
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$13,926
$120
$0
$0
$0
$0
0 $0
$0
$0
0(
$0
$0
$0
$8,451
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
Environmental & Permitting Services
USCG Navigation Survey and Bridge Permit Application
Tree Assessment
Biological Assessment (KPFF Civil)
L'.hting Study Support
Labor Subtotal:
RIVER HYDRAULICS WATERSHED
Reimbursables
. „
$27,538 .•
$7,137
$34,675
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
so
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
so
$0
$0
so
80
80
80
$0
$0
$0
s0
$37,562
$34,675
$0
$0
$4,902
$0
$4,902
$0
$7,485
$10,011
$0
$3,200
$25,702
$20,696
$0
$104
Site Inspection and Meeting
Review Existing Data
Update Baseline Hydraulic Model
Simulate Bridge Alternatives
Evaluate Impacts
Summary Memorandum
Survey for Hydraulics
River cross sections
Convert and add FEMA 100 year flood line to base map
Establish 100 -Year Floodplaln
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
$2,186
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$2,616
$4,802
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,811
$393
$0
$3,203
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$o
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$18,005
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION (UNIVERSAL FIELD SERVICES)
Preparation & Administration
Monthly Invoices and Coordination
Subconsultant Agreement Preparation & Management
Design Team Progress Meetings (Assume 6)
Attend Kick -off Meeting :.
Title /Ownership Review.
UFS Title /Ownership Review
Revleww 10 Additional Title Reports, Plot Easements (KPG)
Data'. Collection and Limit Identification
Determine Right of Way (KPG)
Right -of -Way Limits and Easements
Temporary Right of Entry /Access Permit.
Legal Descriptions and Exhiblts for Acquisition
Public Outreach
Project Funding Estimate (PEE)
Relocation Plan
FHWA Funds Authorization for ROW
Appraisal & Appraisal Review.:
Acquisition Negotiation, Relocation and Closeout
Parcel Acquisition Negotiation
1. Nelson 1. Frohmuth Single Family Residence Parcel (000580.0033) ;..
2 - City of Tukwila River Trail Parcel (252304 -9081)
3A- BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel (252304.0039)
38 - BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC tJffice Building Parcel (252304 -9039)
4A- BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel (252304 -9077)
4B - BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel (252304 -9077)
BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC °fiiee Buytting'Parcel (252304 -9078)
6- Seattle Public Utilities Storm Water Utility Parcel (252304 -9048)
- Park Real Estate LLC Office Bldg /Bank Parcel (002010 -0040)
8 - Andover Plaza LLC Retail Parcel (002310 -0099)
Relocation (Nelson f Frolmuth Parcel)
Parcel Closeout - Escrow Closing
Right -of -Way Certification
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
$14,377
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$6,120
$484
$0
$0
$3,601
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,141
$1,783
$0
$1,274
$0
$2,114
$93,282
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$14,377
$0
Labor Sum i $86,014
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$10,205
$0
$29,145
$4,717
$2,511
$2,511
$2,511
$2,511
$3,097
$3,182
$3,982
$3,982
$6,497
$0
$930
$46,853
$21,848
$46,853
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$20,696 $9,980
2,1 *t.
2.12'.
rate catch basins in west side of W. valley I- Iwy'..
:tend survey of Green River Trail
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Survey at Riverview Plaza Parking Lot
Utility Locating
Walkway Section) Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies
Trail ReaI nmest Alternatives For Riverview Plaza
Riverview frontage f property studies
Meetings for Riverview Plasa property owner coordinattan.
Alternative alignments schematic cast estimate comparison
30% Plans
Site Preparation
Utilities
Storrn Drainage and Grading
Paving Plans `.
Pavement Marking Plans <
Update Storm Drainage Report
Update Cost Estimate
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
CIVIL (KPFF)
Grading and Paving.
Utilities
$0
$0
$0
$0
$279
$279
$838
$2,566
$344
$2,057
$1,867
$2,845
$2,057
$2,057
$5,760
$2,566
$23,516
$0
$860
$951
$1,811
$6,640
$3,806
$0
$5,105
$3,168
$1,848
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$13,926
$120
$0
$0
$0
$0
0 $0
$0
$0
0(
$0
$0
$0
$8,451
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
Environmental & Permitting Services
USCG Navigation Survey and Bridge Permit Application
Tree Assessment
Biological Assessment (KPFF Civil)
L'.hting Study Support
Labor Subtotal:
RIVER HYDRAULICS WATERSHED
Reimbursables
. „
$27,538 .•
$7,137
$34,675
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
so
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
so
$0
$0
so
80
80
80
$0
$0
$0
s0
$37,562
$34,675
$0
$0
$4,902
$0
$4,902
$0
$7,485
$10,011
$0
$3,200
$25,702
$20,696
$0
$104
Site Inspection and Meeting
Review Existing Data
Update Baseline Hydraulic Model
Simulate Bridge Alternatives
Evaluate Impacts
Summary Memorandum
Survey for Hydraulics
River cross sections
Convert and add FEMA 100 year flood line to base map
Establish 100 -Year Floodplaln
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
$2,186
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$2,616
$4,802
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,811
$393
$0
$3,203
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$o
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$18,005
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION (UNIVERSAL FIELD SERVICES)
Preparation & Administration
Monthly Invoices and Coordination
Subconsultant Agreement Preparation & Management
Design Team Progress Meetings (Assume 6)
Attend Kick -off Meeting :.
Title /Ownership Review.
UFS Title /Ownership Review
Revleww 10 Additional Title Reports, Plot Easements (KPG)
Data'. Collection and Limit Identification
Determine Right of Way (KPG)
Right -of -Way Limits and Easements
Temporary Right of Entry /Access Permit.
Legal Descriptions and Exhiblts for Acquisition
Public Outreach
Project Funding Estimate (PEE)
Relocation Plan
FHWA Funds Authorization for ROW
Appraisal & Appraisal Review.:
Acquisition Negotiation, Relocation and Closeout
Parcel Acquisition Negotiation
1. Nelson 1. Frohmuth Single Family Residence Parcel (000580.0033) ;..
2 - City of Tukwila River Trail Parcel (252304 -9081)
3A- BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel (252304.0039)
38 - BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC tJffice Building Parcel (252304 -9039)
4A- BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel (252304 -9077)
4B - BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel (252304 -9077)
BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC °fiiee Buytting'Parcel (252304 -9078)
6- Seattle Public Utilities Storm Water Utility Parcel (252304 -9048)
- Park Real Estate LLC Office Bldg /Bank Parcel (002010 -0040)
8 - Andover Plaza LLC Retail Parcel (002310 -0099)
Relocation (Nelson f Frolmuth Parcel)
Parcel Closeout - Escrow Closing
Right -of -Way Certification
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
$14,377
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$6,120
$484
$0
$0
$3,601
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,141
$1,783
$0
$1,274
$0
$2,114
$93,282
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$14,377
$0
Labor Sum i $86,014
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$10,205
$0
$29,145
$4,717
$2,511
$2,511
$2,511
$2,511
$3,097
$3,182
$3,982
$3,982
$6,497
$0
$930
$46,853
$21,848
$46,853
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$20,696 $9,980
2.1 1 locate catch be
Z12 Extend su
y
ins in we
Green RI
side of W. Valley H
Trail
ry
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
$0
$0
$0
ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT G MENT PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Survey at Riverview Plaza Parking Lot
Utility Locating
Walkway'Secticdl Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies
Trail Rc allgnment Alternatives For Riverview Plaza
Riverview frontage 1 property studies
Meetings for Riverview Plaxa property owner coordination.
Alternative alignments schematioicost estimate comparison
30% Plans
Site Preparation
Utilities
Storm Draklage and Grading
Paving 1Plans
Pavement Marking Puns
Update Storm Drainage Report
Update Cost Estimate
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
CIVIL (KPFF)
Grading and Paving.
Utilities `.
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
80
40
0 120 0
S14 '1-mr
80 80
16
80 96 0
$279
$279
5838
$2,566
$344
$2,057
$1,867
$2,845
52,057
$2,057
55,760
$2,566
$23,516
$0
$27,538
$7,137
$34,675
$o
Environmental & Permitting Services
USCG Navigation Survey and Bridge Permit Application
Tree Assessment
Biological Assessment (KPFF CMI)
Lighting Study Support.
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
$0
$0
$4,902
$0
54,902
$0
RIVER HYDRAULICS WATERSHED
Site Inspection and Meeting
Review Existing Data
Update Baseline Hydraulic Model
Simulate Bridge Alternatives
Evaluate Impacts
Summary Memorandum
Survey for Hydraulics
River cross sections
Convert and add FEMA 100 year flood tine to has
Establish :100 -Year Floodplain
Labor Subtotal:
$2,186
50
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2,616
$4,802
Reimbursables
NOT USED
Reimbursables
RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION (UNIVERSAL FIELD SERVICES)
Preparation & Administration
Monthly Invoices and Coordination'
Sub consuttantAgreement Preparation & Management
sign Team Progress Meetings (Assume 6)
Attend Kick -off; Meeting
Title /Ownefship Revi
UFS TittelOwnershlp Review
Review 10 Additional Title Reports, Plot Easements (KPG)
Data Collection and Limit Identification
Determine Right of Way (KPG
Right -of -Way Limits and Easemet
Temporary Right of Entry /Access Penni
Legal Descriptions and Exhib!
Public Outreach
Project Funding Estimate (PFE)
elocati0n Plan
FHWA Funds Authorizatic
Appraisal & Appraisal Review,
Acquisition Negotiation, Relocati
Parcel Acquisition! Negotiati
1 Nelson 1 Frohmuth Single Family Residence Parcel (000580-0033)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
0
40
80
16
$0
514,377
Aci7ulsitlon
or RS
and Closeou
$0
0
$0
$0
0
$0
$0
2 € City 0f Tukwila River Trail Parcel (292304 - 90810
3A- BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office: Building Parcel (252304 -9039
B - BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel (252304 - 9039).
4A - BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office: Building Parcel (252304 - 9077):
48 • BRCP Rivervi ew Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel
252304 -8077
5 - BRCP Rvervtew Plaza LLC 0 c Building Parcel (252304 -9078)
6 - Seattle Public Utilities Storm Water Utility Parcel (252304. 9048).
- Park Real Eutate LLC Office 81
8- Andover Plaza LLC Retail Parcel (002310 -0099)
k- Parcel(002310- 0040),1
8.82 Relocation ((Nelson 1 Frohmuth: Parcel)
8.83 Parcel Closeout - Escrow Closin
.90',' Right -of -Way Certification'
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Labor Subtotal: 0
Reimbursables
0
40
0
80
16
0
0
Labor Sum 22
272
40
236
180
10''
0
$0
50
$0
50
$0
$0
0
$14,377
0
$86,014
2.11
,ocate'catch basins in west side of W. Valley Hwy
2.12
Extend; survey of Green River Trail
Labor Subtotal:
0
2
Reimbursables
5
8
$860
$951
0
$1,811
3.0
ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT PRELIMINARY DESIGN
10
Survey' at Riverview Plaza Parking Lot
Utility Locating
Walkway Section/ Parking Lot Trail Alignment 5
3.21
Trail
Alternatives For Riverview Plaza
12
12
16
$6,640
$3,806
$0
32
$5,105
3.22
Riverview frontage / property studies
3,23
Meeall
Piave property o
$3,168
$1,848
3.24
Alternative alignmenisschematic cost mate comparison
$0
3.30
30% Plans
$0
Site Preparation
$0
3.32
Utilities,
$0
torm Drainage and Grading
$0
3.34
Paving Plans
$0
Pavement Marking Plans
$0
3.40
Update Storni Drainage Report
$0
.50
Update Cost Estimate
$0
Labor Subtotal:
14
30
60
16
$13,926
Reimbursables
4.0
4.1
4.20
5.0
CIVIL (KPFF)
Grading and Paving.
Utilities
Environmental & Permitting Services
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
5.10 `-
USCG Navigation Survey and Bridge Permit Application
Tree Assessment
5.21
Biologioni Assessment (KPFF Civil)
5.30
Lighting Study Support i.
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
6.0
RIVER HYDRAULICS (WATERSHED)
6.10
Site Inspection and Meeting
FN:� 5..0454
Rl:
0
0
SE,
0
0
0
0
$120
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$0_c
$0
3.20'
Review Existing Data
$0
Update Baseline Hydraulic Model
$0
6.40
Simulate Bridge Alternatives
$0
Evaluate )mpac
$0
Summary Memorandum
$0
.70
Survey for Hydraulics
50
6.71
River cross Sect°
$2,811
Convert and add FEMA 100 year flood line to base map
$393
6.80
Establish 100 -Year Floodplain ,.
7.0
NOT USED
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
11
12
0
.............
$0
$3,203
$0.
$0
$0
Labor Subtotal:
0
0
0
0
0
0
$0
Reimbursables
8.0
8.11
RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION (UNIVERSAL FIELD SERVICES)
Prepare tion& Administration
Monthly Invoices and Coordination
5
$01
$0
SUtconsultant Agreement Preparation & Management
8.13
Design Team Progress Meetings (Assume 6):'
$0
$0
8.14
id Kick -off Meeting
$0
8.20
8.21
Title /Ownership Rev
UFS Tide /Ownership Review
$0
8.22
eview 10 Additig
Title Reports, Plot Easements (KPG)
40
10
$6,120
Data Collection and Limit Identification
8.31
Determine Right of Way (KPG)
$484
8.32
Right -of -Way Limits and Easements..
$0
8.33
Temporary Right
Enb
'AC
ass Permit
$0
8.34
Legal Descriptions and Exhibits for Acquisition
20
10
$3,601
8.40
Public Outreach
$0
8,50
Project Funding Estimate(PFE),;
$0
8.60
Relocation Plan
$0
8,61
FHWA Funds Au
zation for RO W
$0
8.70
Appraisal & Ap
I Review
$0
8.80
Acquisition Negohatio
loseout
Parcel Acgi
ion Negoti
Nelson / Frohmuth Single Family Residence Parcel (000580.0033)
$0
- City of Tukwila River Trail Parcel (282304 -9081)
$0
3A RCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel (252304 -9039)
$0
38 -BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel (252304 -9039)
$0
4A -BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel. (252304 -9077)
$0
48.- BRCP Rivervi
Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel (252304. 9077)
$0
BRCP Riverview PI;
LL
1ceBuitding Parc4
$0
6- Seattle Public Utlliti
Storm Water Utility Parcel (252304. 9046)
$0
Park Real E
Office SIi
/Bank Parcel
72310- 0040).; ,.
$0
Andover Plaza LLC Retail Parcel (002310-0099)
$0
a82,
Relocation (Nelson ;x Frohmu th Parcel)
$0
Parcel Closeout - E5cr
Closing'
$0
8.90'
Right -of -Way Certification
$0
Labor Subtotal:
61
24
0
$10,205
Reimbursables
Labor Sum
14 ,,
96
100
36
$29,145
2.
1
2,12
Catch
rin
Extend survey of G
Nr� y
in west side of W. Valley H
'eon River Trail
Labor Subtotal
Reimbursables
ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Survey at Riverview Plaza Parking Lot
Utility Locating.
Walkway Section/ Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies;
TralI Realignment Alternatives For Riverview Plaza
Riverview frontage 1 property studies
Meetings for Rive view Plaza property owner coordination.
Altemative alignments schematic cost estimate comparison
30% Plans
Site Preparation
Utilities
Storm Drainage and Grading
Paving Plans:
Pavement Marking Plans
Update Storm Drainage Report
Update Cost Estimate
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
0
0
0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
CIVIL (KPFF)
Grading and Paving.
Utilities
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
Environmental & Permitting Services
USCG Navigation Survey and Bridge Permit Application
Tree Assessment
Biological Assessment (KPFF Civil)
Lighting StudySUpport
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
RIVER HYDRAULICS WATERSHED
Site Inspection and Meeting}
Review Existing Data
Update Baseline Hydraulic Model
Simulate Bridge Alternatives i.
Evaluate Impacts
Summary Memorandum
Survey for Hydraulics
River crass sections
Convert and add FEMA 100 year flood line ti
Establish 100 -Year Ftbodplain
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
NOT USED
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
8.0 RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION (UNIVERSAL FIELD SERVICES)
.10 Preparation & Administration
Monthly Invoices and Coordination
SubconsultantAgreement Prepar
Man.
en
.14
20
Titi
Design Team Progress Meeting
Attend Kick-off Meeting
0wnership Review
(AS
la
Um
6)
21 UFS Tifle/Ownership Revien
8.22 Review90 Additional Title Reports
Plot Ea
ements (KPG).
8.30 Data
loltectiion
8.
Determin
Ind Limit Identification?
61951 of Way (KPG)
8.32
Right -o
y Limits and Easements
8.33
Tei
P
any R
iht of Entry/A
Pe
8.34
Legal Descr
ions
nd Exhibit
fo
Acquisition
8.40
8.50
8.60
Public Outreacfr`
Project Funding Estim,
Relocation P
n;
PFE)
61 :FHWA Funds Authoriz
8.70 Appraisal & Appraisal R
8.80
iew
n for ROW
Acquisition Negotiation, Relocatic
Parcel Acquisition Negotia
nd
eau,'
0
0
0
0
3
3
6
21
3.5
3.5'
10
1
24
05
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1
141
$837
$1
783
$566
$1
812
0
$0
$0
274
$0
$143
$288
$2
114
0
$806
1
Nel
on / Frohmuth Sin
le Family Residence Parcel
00
80.0031
50
- City
Tukt
River Trail P
3A -RR
P Ric
le
arc
Plaza LLI
el(252304 -9081)
Office Building Parcel (25230
2
4
39)
3
25
4
8 - BRCP
Live
111
4A - BRCP Rivei
ie
4B
BRCP River
Plaza LLC'Offce Building Parcel (252304-9039)
Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel (252304 -9077)
LLC Office Building P
Plaza LLC Once B
Plaz
BRCP River
Ild
col (252304-9077)
3
25
4
1'
3
25
4
3
4
ng.Parcel
(2
7
}
11
4
30
6
6 - Seattle Public Utilities Storm Water Utility Parcel (25230
Park Real Estate LLC Office Bldg /Bank Parcel (002310-
Andover Plaza LLC Retail Parcel (002310 -0099)
-9t
5
30
6
140.
4
40
8
40
8
32 :Reioca ion (Nelson / Frohmuth Parcel
Parcel Closeout - Escrow Closin
83
10
65 'c
8.90
Right-of-Way Certification
2
4
6
4,717
$659
$2,511
$2,511
$2,511
$2,511
$3,097
$3,182
$3,982
$3,982
$6,497
$0
$930
Labor Subtotal:
25
84.5
329
89
86
Reimbursables
Labor Sum
25
85
329
8
86
1
$46,853
$21,848;
$46,853
cY ,oNY' tl
Locate catch basins in west side of W. Valley Hwy
Extend survey of Green River Trail
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
3.0
3.10
3.11
3.20
3.21
3.22
3.23
3.24
3.30
3.31
3.32
3.33
3.34
3.35
3.40
3.50
ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT PRELIMINARY DESIGN
Survey at Riverview Plaza Parkng Lot
Utility Locating
Walkway Section/ Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies
Trail Realignment Alternatives For Riverview Plaza
Riverview frontage / property studies
Meetings for Riverview Plaza property owner coordination.
Alternative alignments schematic cost estimate comparison
30% Plans
Site Preparation
Utilities
Storm Drainage and Grading
Paving Plans
Pavement Marking Plans
Update Storm Drainage Report
Update Cost Estimate
0
Labor Subtotal: 0
Reimbursables
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$o
$0
$o
$0
$0
$0
$0
4.0
4.10
4.20
CIVIL (KPFF)
Grading and Paving.
Utilities
Labor Subtotal: 0
Reimbursables
5.0
5.10
5.20
5.21
5.30
Environmental & Permitting Services
USCG Navigation Survey and Bridge Permit Application
Tree Assessment
Biological Assessment (KPFF Civil)
Lighting Study Support
Labor Subtotal: 0
Reimbursables
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7,485
$10,011
$0
$3,200
$20,696
$104
6.0
6.10
6.20
6.30
6.40
6.50
6.60
6.70
6.71
6.72
6.80
RIVER HYDRAULICS (WATERSHED)
Site Inspection and Meeting
Review Existing Data
Update Baseline Hydraulic Model
Simulate Bridge Alternatives
Evaluate Impacts
Summary Memorandum
Survey for Hydraulics
River cross sections
Convert and add FEMA 100 year Flood line to base map
Establish 100 -Year Floodplain
$0
$0
$0
$0
00
so
00
$0
$0
Labor Sub
Reimburse
NOT USED
8.10
8.11
8.12
8.13
8.14
8.20
8.21
8.22
8.30
8,31
8.32
8.33
8.34
8.40
8.50
8.60
8.61
8.70
8.80
8.81
Labor Subtotal:
Reimbursables
RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION UNIVERSAL FIELD SERVICES
Preparation & Administration
Monthly Invoices and Coordination
Subconsultant Agreement Preparation & Managemen
Design Team Progress Meetings (Assume 6)
Title/Ownership Review
UFS Title/Ownership Review
Review 10 Additional Title Reports, Plot Easements (KPG)
Data Collection and Limit Identification
Determine Right of Way (KPG)
Right -of -Way Limits and Easements
Temporary Right of Entry/Access Permit
Legal Descriptions and Exhibits for Acquisition
Public Outreach
Project Funding Estimate (PFE)
Relocation Plan
FHWA Funds Authorization for ROW
Appraisal & Appraisal Review
Acquisition Negotiation, Relocation and Closeout
Parcel Acquisition Negotiation
8.82
8.83
6.qt)
1 - Nelson / Frohmuth Single Family Residence Parcel (000580 -0033)
2 - City of Tukwila River Trail Parcel (252304 -9081)
3A - BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel (252304 -9039)
36 - BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel (252304.9039)
4A - BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel (252304 -9077)
4B - BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel (252304 -9077)
5 - BRCP Riverview Plaza LLC Office Building Parcel (252304 -9078)
6 - Seattle Public Utilities Storm Water Utility Parcel (252304 -9048)
7 - Park Real Estate LLC Office Bldg/Bank Parcel (002310 -0040)
8 - Andover Plaza LLC Retail Parcel (002310 -0099)
Parcel Closeout - Escrow Closing
Right -of -Way Certification
abor Subtotal:
Reimbursable!
Labor Sum 0.0 8.0
86.0 12.0 8.0 20.0 7.0 I 48 .0
$0
so
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$20,696
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2014 to 2019
PROJECT: Tukwila Urban Center - Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Project No. 90510403
DESCRIPTION: Construct a new pedestrian /bicycle bridge over the Green River.
JUSTIFICATION: Pedestrian /bicycle connection between Tukwila's Urban Center and commuter rail /Amtrak station.
Supports local and regional goals and policies regarding land use and transportation in Urban Center.
Pedestrian System Report identified the optimal location for bridge crossing to be south of the Best
STATUS: Western Hotel. Type, Size, and Location Report was completed in 2011. Council approved a design of
a twin -tied arch bridge with no accommodation for a future bridge crossing over West Valley Highway.
MAINT. IMPACT: To be determined.
Design grants: State Enhancement for $190k & $500k, Transit Oriented Development (TOD) planning grant
COMMENT: of $55k, and Federal CMAQ grant of $751 K. WSDOT Regional Mobility construction grant of $6.870M.
Project is on Park Impact Fee list with funding of $2 million with an 80 %/20% split for $1.6M. Interfund loan
of $665k from the Water Enterprise fund will be repaid with future park impact fees.
FINANCIAL Through Estimated
in $000's
2012 2013 2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
BEYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Design
585
748
300
1,633
Land (R/W)
1,100
1,100
Const. Mgmt.
1,000
1,000
Construction
6,485
6,485
TOTAL EXPENSES
585
748
1,400
7,485
0
0
0
0
0
10,218
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant
540
713
243
1,496
Awarded Reg Mobility
870
6,000
6,870
Park Impact Fees
!
35
55
55
145
Interfund Loan (Water)
665
665
City Oper. Revenue
45
0
232
765
0
0
0
0
0
1,042
TOTAL SOURCES
585
748
1,400
7,485
0
0
0
0
0
10,218
0 Project Loca
2014 - 2019 Capital Improvement Program
12
97
98
TO:
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
BY: Derek Speck, Economic Development Administrator
DATE: November 22, 2013
SUBJECT: Street Vacation of 41st Avenue South
Resolution Setting a Public Hearing Date
ISSUE
Council is being asked to approve a resolution setting a Public Hearing date of January 27, 2014 to consider vacating
the portion of 41st Ave S that adjoins S 144th St.
BACKGROUND
Since 1999 the City has been acquiring and clearing property at the intersection of Tukwila International Blvd and S
144th St for the Tukwila Village redevelopment project in order to eliminate blight and to revitalize the neighborhood.
A portion of 41St Ave S lies within Tukwila Village project boundaries. Early in its inception, the Tukwila Village project
included the possibility of vacating 41st Ave S in order to enable better site planning and more efficient development.
DISCUSSION
The City owns all of the parcels along the east and west sides of this portion of 41st Ave S. If the street is vacated, the
title of the land would then belong to the City as land, but not "right of way ". The City could then sell this property in
combination with the land that is part of the Tukwila Village development.
41st Ave S is the only public road providing access to the parking lot that is on Normandy Court property. As such, the
City is legally bound to ensure the Normandy Court property continues to have reasonable access to a public road
such as S 144th St or Tukwila International Blvd. Since 2012 the City, Tukwila Village developer and owners of
Normandy Court have discussed ways to provide easements such that Normandy Court has continuous access to
public streets. Currently, the owners of Normandy Court are considering a binding letter proposal offered by the
Tukwila Village developer as an incentive to fully support the project. If the Council decides to approve an ordinance
to vacate 41st Ave S, the ordinance would include a condition requiring those easements to be put into place.
The Samara Apartments have a 25' wide easement across the Normandy Court parking lot from the Samara property
to 41st Ave S. Although the City is not legally bound to provide public access to the Samara property since it already
has good access on 42nd Ave S, the Samara and City desire to have continued access for emergency vehicles.
Therefore, the Tukwila Village site plan has anticipated roadways that will allow emergency vehicle access to
Samara's easement.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
As the City owns the street and adjacent parcels, there will be no cost or budgetary impact.
RECOMMENDATION
Council is being asked to approve the resolution setting a Public Hearing date of January 27, 2014 to consider
vacating the portion of 41St Ave S that adjoins S 144th St and consider this item at the December 9, 2013 Committee
of the Whole meeting and subsequent Special Meeting that same night.
Attachments: Draft Resolution
Legal Description
Survey Map
Normandy Court Location Map
Z:1Tukwila Villagellnfo Memo Resolution Setting PH 41st Ave S Street Vacation - sb.doc
99
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, FIXING THE TIME FOR A
PUBLIC HEARING FOR VACATION OF RIGHT -OF -WAY
WITHIN THE CITY OF TUKWILA DEDICATED FOR
STREET PURPOSES, GENERALLY DESCRIBED AS
PORTIONS OF 41ST AVENUE SOUTH.
WHEREAS, since 1999 the City has been acquiring and clearing property at the
intersection of Tukwila International Boulevard and South 144th Street for the Tukwila
Village redevelopment project in order to eliminate blight and revitalize the surrounding
neighborhood; and
WHEREAS, the portion of 41st Avenue South adjoining South 144th Street is
situated within the boundaries of the Tukwila Village properties and is necessary to be
redeveloped for the efficient site planning and development of Tukwila Village; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.79.010, a public hearing on the street vacation
must be set by resolution;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A public hearing regarding the vacation of that portion of 41st Avenue
South adjoining South 144th Street, as more particularly described on the attached map
and legal description, shall be held before the Tukwila City Council in the City Council
Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, on
January 27, 2014, which is not less than 20 nor more than 60 days from the date of
passage of this resolution, at which time all persons interested in said right -of -way
vacation are invited to appear and be heard.
Section 2. The City Clerk is directed to post written notice of pendency of the
public hearing in three public places in the City of Tukwila and in one additional
conspicuous place on the right -of -way sought to be vacated at least 20 days prior to the
date set for the public hearing.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at
a Special Meeting thereof this day of , 2013.
100
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk Kathy Hougardy, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney
Attachments: Map and Legal Description
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Resolution Number:
101
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION
That portion of 41st Avenue South as dedicated by the Plat of Cherry Lane, recorded in Volume 48
of Plats, at Page 21, records of King County, Washington, Lying North of a line parallel with and
30.00 feet North of the South line of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 15,
Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian.
Containing approximately 23,967 square feet.
Project Name: Tukwila Village
May 31, 2012
Page 1 of 1
BDG
15255L.001.doc
Exhibit: 1 5255 EXH01 -VAC. dwg
102
,
1"=80,
PARCEL L o
P. boo 900 —9 -66
GEC o.Uvloe
e009002400314
RIGHT -OF -WAY
VACATION
23,967± S.F.
O M
- N O
S. 144TH ST
. S' LINE SE1/ W� /4 SEC.15
File:P: \15000s\ 15255 \survey \15255tEXH01 — VAC.dwg Date /Time:5/31/2012 2:49 PM BRIAN GILLOOLY
SCALE:
HORIZONTAL 1 " =80' VERTICAL N/A
18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH
KENT, WA 98032
(425)251-6222
Z (425)251 -8782 FAX
CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND
• PLANNING, SURVEYING,
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
For:
TUKWILA
VILLAGE
JOB NUMBER
15255
15255L.001.DOC
Title:
RIGHT -OF -WAY
VACATION
SHEET
DESIGNED XXX 'DRAWN
1 0f 1
STM (CHECKED BDG (APPROVED BDG l DATE 05 -31 -12 ,
103
Normandy Court Property
The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or
warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended for use as a survey product. King County
shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the
information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County.
Date: 11/19 -2013 Source: King County iMAP - Property Information (http://www.metrokc.gov/GISiiMAID)
L.A1 King County
TO:
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton
Community Affairs and Parks Committee
Transportation Committee
FROM: Jack Pace, DCD Director
BY: Nora Gierloff, Deputy DCD Director
DATE: November 19, 2013
SUBJECT: Growing Transit Communities Compact
ISSUE
The Puget Sound Regional Council has invited the City of Tukwila to partner with a regional
coalition of governments, non - profits and community stakeholders in supporting the Growing
Transit Communities Strategy by signing the Growing Transit Communities Compact.
BACKGROUND
In October 2010, the region was awarded a $5,000,000 regional planning grant from the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Sustainable Housing and
Communities. These grant funds supported a multi -year PSRC program called Growing Transit
Communities. The Council was given an overview and status report on this program at your
March 25, 2013 meeting.
The Growing Transit Communities Partnership, a broad coalition of stakeholders from the
public, private and nonprofit sectors including the City of Tukwila, came together in 2010 to
identify what will be needed to create the sustainable, equitable communities envisioned in
adopted regional plans and supported by the region's commitment of nearly $20 Billion in high -
capacity transit investments. These plans and investments present a once -in -a- lifetime
opportunity to shape the region and ensure that transportation improvements support
sustainable development and foster vibrant, healthy neighborhoods for all.
DISCUSSION
This summer, following an extensive 18 -month collaborative process, the Partnership adopted
the Growing Transit Communities Strategy. This document presents consensus approaches to
developing the region's high- capacity and high frequency transit areas, and what tools and
resources are needed to implement the region's adopted plans with a focus on three
overarching goals:
• Attract more of the region's residential and employment growth near high- capacity transit
• Provide housing choices affordable to a full range of incomes near high- capacity transit
• Increase access to opportunity for existing and future community members in transit
communities
The goals and recommendations in the Growing Transit Communities Strategy are wide -
ranging, developed with the recognition that some approaches may work in some locations but
not in others, and that each partner retains flexibility to pursue the actions most appropriate to
105
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
local needs and conditions. The region's continued success will require an ongoing, dedicated
partnership of a wide variety of public, private, non - profit, and community stakeholders.
The full text of the Growing Transit Communities Strategy as well as more detailed summaries
of work program elements are available at http: / /www.psrc.orq /growth /growing - transit-
communities. For more information, please contact Michael Hubner at (206) 971 -3289 or at
mhubnerpsrc.org.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Signing the Compact would have no direct budget impact.
RECOMMENDATION
The Council is being asked to approve the resolution and consider this item in January 2014.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Draft Resolution
B. Growing Transit Communities Compact
C. Growing Transit Communities Strategy Executive Summary
11deptstore \City Common\DCD n Clerk 's \GrowingTransitCommunities 111- 25- 13_GTC_CommitteeMemo.docx
106
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AFFIRMING
THE CITY OF TUKWILA'S SUPPORT FOR THE
GROWING TRANSIT COMMUNITIES COMPACT.
WHEREAS, the central Puget Sound region has adopted VISION 2040, a long -
range strategy to advance the ideals of our people, our prosperity and our planet by
integrating land use, economic and transportation decisions in order to meet the needs
of current and future generations, achieve economic prosperity with social equity, and
support a healthy environment, including addressing global climate change; and
WHEREAS, VISION 2040 includes among its goals: (1) maintaining a prosperous
and sustainable regional economy by supporting businesses and job creation, investing
in all people, sustaining environmental quality, and creating great central places,
diverse communities, and a high quality of life; (2) focusing growth within already
urbanized areas to create walkable, compact, and transit - oriented communities; and (3)
meeting housing needs through preservation and expansion of a range of affordable,
healthy and safe housing choices; and
WHEREAS, the voters of the central Puget Sound region have committed to a $15
billion investment in light rail, commuter rail, bus rapid transit and local streetcar service
that creates a once -in -a- lifetime opportunity to plan for and support the growth of
communities near high- capacity transit; and
WHEREAS, transit - oriented development is a land use pattern with many social,
economic, and environmental benefits, including more sustainable and efficient use of
urban land, support for regional and local economies, reduced combined housing and
transportation costs per household, and improved access and mobility for residents;
and
WHEREAS, the Growing Transit Communities Partnership was formed as a diverse
coalition of governmental and nongovernmental partners that was funded by a grant
from the federal Partnership for Sustainable Communities for the express purpose of
leveraging regional transit investments to create thriving and equitable transit
communities around light rail and other high- capacity transit stations; and
Attachment A
107
WHEREAS, progress toward creating equitable transit communities will depend on
active participation from a full range of partners over the long term, including transit
agencies, businesses, and non - profit organizations, as well as local jurisdictions and
the Puget Sound Regional Council; and
WHEREAS, the Growing Transit Communities Partnership has developed the
Growing Transit Communities Strategy, which recommends adoption of specific actions
and tools by regional and local governments, by both public and private stakeholders, in
order to create, grow, and enhance equitable transit communities throughout the region;
and
WHEREAS, it is in the interest of elected officials; public agencies; and leaders of
and for affordable housing, communities and neighborhoods, business, education, the
environment, philanthropy, finance, real estate, and transportation to cooperatively
engage in the work related to the Growing Transit Communities Strategy for its
successful completion; and
WHEREAS, the Growing Transit Communities Strategy will be managed by the
Puget Sound Regional Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. This resolution is established to acknowledge the support and need for
coordinating efforts to successfully implement the Growing Transit Communities
Strategy, and to authorize execution of the Growing Transit Communities Compact on
behalf of the City of Tukwila.
Section 2. The undersigned individual hereby executes this resolution on behalf of
her respective agency and authorizes a designee to sign the Growing Transit
Communities Compact.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2013.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk Kathy Hougardy, Council President
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Resolution Number:
108
Growing Tran Co unities Compact
Preamble
VISION 2040 was approved as the central Puget Sound region's plan for sustainable development following a broad -
based, collaborative planning process. Central Puget Sound region voters also approved a series of high- capacity
light rail and transit projects —a commitment of approximately $15 billion —that will serve the region's most densely
populated and diverse communities for decades to come. These investments present a once -in -a- lifetime opportunity
to shape the region's urban form and ensure that transportation improvements support sustainable development and
foster vibrant, healthy neighborhoods for all.
Recognizing what this unprecedented opportunity means for the region and its residents, a broad coalition of
stakeholders came together to identify what will be needed to create the sustainable, equitable communities
envisioned in the region's plans. The result was the Growing Transit Communities Partnership.
The Growing Transit Communities Partnership produced the Growing Transit Communities Strategy as a tool to
implement VISION 2040 and local comprehensive plans adopted under the state Growth Management Act, and
which is supported by this Compact. Its goals and recommendations are wide - ranging, developed with the
recognition that some tools and approaches may work in some locations but not in others, and that each partner
retains flexibility and discretion in pursuing the strategies most appropriate to local needs and conditions. However,
the envisioned outcomes, consistent with VISION 2040, require an ongoing dedicated partnership of many interests,
including cities, counties, transit agencies, businesses and employers, housing authorities, public health agencies,
affordable housing providers, educational institutions, community -based organizations, and development interests.
And while the Compact is not legally binding and does not mandate adoption of any particular policies or actions, it
expresses the need for many and diverse partners to work together over time to achieve its goals, recognizing that
opportunities for success cannot be achieved unless we work together.
Therefore, as signatories to the Compact, we commit ourselves to working in partnership to achieve the goals and
strategies in this Compact, while respecting the diversity of interests, perspectives, and responsibilities throughout
the region.
Attachment B
Growing Transit Communities Compact 1 August 23, 2013 1
109
Whereas the central Puget Sound region has adopted VISION 2040, with the following vision statement:
Our vision for the future advances the ideals of our people, our prosperity, and our planet. As we work toward
achieving the region's vision, we must protect the environment, support and create vibrant, livable, and
healthy communities, offer economic opportunities for all, provide safe and efficient mobility, and use our
resources wisely and efficiently. Land use, economic, and transportation decisions will be integrated in a
manner that supports a healthy environment, addresses global climate change, achieves social equity, and is
attentive to the needs of future generations.
and;
Whereas the central Puget Sound region is expected to add 1.3 million people and 1.1 million jobs by the year 2040;
and
Whereas VISION 2040 includes among its goals (1) maintaining a prosperous and sustainable regional economy by
supporting businesses and job creation, investing in all people, sustaining environmental quality, and creating great
central places, diverse communities, and a high quality of life, and (2) focusing growth within already urbanized areas
to create walkable, compact, and transit oriented communities, and (3) meeting housing needs through preservation
and expansion of a range of affordable, healthy and safe housing choices; and
Whereas the voters of the central Puget Sound region have committed to a $15 billion investment in light rail,
commuter rail, bus rapid transit and local streetcar service that creates a once -in -a- lifetime opportunity to plan for and
support the growth of communities near high capacity transit; and
Whereas in 2010 the region adopted Transportation 2040, a long -range transportation plan designed to implement
VISION 2040 that calls for implementation of an aggressive transit strategy to keep up with increasing population and
employment growth, including completion of Sound Transit 2 projects, additional Link light rail extensions to Everett,
Tacoma, and Redmond, and local transit service increases of more than 100 percent in peak periods and over 80
percent in off -peak periods; and
Whereas The Regional Economic Strategy recognizes that transportation investments must address the diverse
needs of the region's economy and support key employment sectors, provide more convenient and varied
transportation options, and improve travel reliability to maintain and enhance quality of life in the region for workers
and support local businesses; and
Whereas approximately 45% of households currently residing in proximity to existing and planned light rail corridors
are moderately or severely housing cost burdened; and
Whereas current income distribution for the region shows 13% of households earn between 0 -30% of the area
median income, 12% of households earn between 30 -50% of the area median income, and 18% of households earn
between 50 -80% of the area median income; and
Whereas new market -rate housing trends and subsidized housing resources are not providing sufficient housing
choices in transit communities for households earning under 80% of the area median income; and
Growing Transit Communities Compact 1 August 23, 2013 2
110
Whereas the combined cost burden of housing plus transportation can be substantially reduced by locating
affordable housing opportunities in proximity to transit; and
Whereas the report "Equity, Opportunity, and Sustainability in the Central Puget Sound Region" identifies a
widespread pattern within the region of unequal household access to educational, economic, transportation,
environmental health, and neighborhood resources; and
Whereas many communities that are now or may be served by high- capacity transit are home to low- income and
minority households and small locally- and minority -owned businesses that are at a potentially higher risk of
displacement due to a range of factors; and
Whereas transit - oriented development is a land use pattern with many social, economic, and environmental benefits,
including more sustainable and efficient use of urban land, support for regional and local economies, reduced
combined housing and transportation costs per household, and improved access and mobility for residents; and
Whereas the Growing Transit Communities Partnership, a diverse coalition of governmental and nongovernmental
partners, was funded by a grant from the federal Partnership for Sustainable Communities for the express purpose of
helping to implement VISION 2040 by leveraging regional transit investments to create thriving and equitable transit
communities around light rail and other high- capacity transit stations; and
Whereas the Equity Network Steering Committee has defined equity to mean that all people can attain the resources
and opportunities that improve their quality of life and enable them to reach their full potential; and
Whereas the Growing Transit Communities Partnership defines equitable transit communities as follows:
Equitable transit communities are mixed -use, transit - served neighborhoods that provide housing and
transportation choices, and greater social and economic opportunity for current and future residents.
Although defined by a half -mile walking distance around high- capacity transit stations, they exist
within the context of larger neighborhoods with existing residents and businesses.
These communities promote local community and economic development by providing housing
types at a range of densities and affordability levels, commercial and retail spaces, community
services and other amenities integrated into safe, walkable neighborhoods.
Successful equitable transit communities are created through inclusive planning and decision -
making processes, resulting in development outcomes that accommodate future residential and
employment growth, increase opportunity and mobility for existing communities, and enhance public
health for socially and economically diverse populations
Whereas Growing Transit Communities Partners recognize that transit communities throughout the region will have
unique roles, functions, and opportunities, and will develop with different uses at varying intensities; and
Whereas creating vibrant transit - oriented communities can be substantially advanced through the development of
additional tools and funding for infrastructure improvements in communities along transit corridors; and
Growing Transit Communities Compact 1 August 23, 2013 3
111
Whereas Growing Transit Communities Partners believe that progress toward creating equitable transit communities
will depend on active participation from a full range of partners over the long term, including transit agencies,
businesses, non - profit organizations, as well as local jurisdictions and the Puget Sound Regional Council; and
Whereas the Growing Transit Communities Partnership has developed a Toolkit of Strategies and Actions that
recommend adoption of specific actions and tools by regional and local governments, by both public and private
stakeholders, in order to create, grow, and enhance equitable transit communities throughout the region; and
Whereas updates to local comprehensive plans and development regulations, transit agency plans, and the
refinement of regional growth and transportation plans present continuing opportunities to implement the Toolkit of
Strategies and Actions;
Now, therefore, the signatories to this Regional Compact:
Agree that the region's long -range growth management, economic, environmental, and transportation goals depend
heavily on continued investment in more and better public transportation services ; and
Acknowledge the acute need for additional resources and tools to create and preserve affordable housing throughout
the region; and
Recognize that cities and counties will require new resources to create the critical physical and social infrastructure
that will support growth, including transportation, utilities, recreation, and public services; and
Agree that progress toward equitable transit communities requires a cooperative, regional approach with diverse
partners across governmental and nongovernmental sectors that supports and builds upon existing and ongoing
planning efforts by regional and local governments and transit agencies; and
Commit to build upon the work of the Growing Transit Communities Partnership through the promotion of equitable
transit communities in light rail station areas and transit nodes located within the region's three long -range light rail
transit corridors, and around transit nodes outside these corridors in other parts of the region; and
Recognize that each corridor is at a different stage of high- capacity transit system development, and that future
stations may be identified and sited that should also be considered under this Compact; and
Understand that this Compact is designed to express the intent of diverse partners to work together toward common
goals, with specific actions identified by partners appropriate to their roles and responsibilities; and
Recognize that the policies and programs promoted by the Growing Transit Communities Partnership may also
benefit community development around other transit investments and corridors, including but not limited to bus rapid
transit, streetcar, commuter rail, intercity express bus, and ferries; and
Support a continuing process of collaboration and coordinated action to advance the development of equitable transit
communities, as guided by the following goals, signatories to this Compact will strive to:
Growing Transit Communities Compact 1 August 23, 2013 4
112
Attract more of the region's residential and employment growth to high capacity transit communities.
VISION 2040 calls for a compact pattern of growth within the Urban Growth Area, particularly in
regional and subregional centers served by high capacity transit. The Growing Transit Communities
work program has demonstrated that the region's light rail corridors alone have the potential to
support this vision by attracting at least 25% of the housing growth and 35% of the employment
growth expected in the region through the year 2040. Attracting additional TOD market demand to
other regional corridors that are served by other types of high capacity transit is also essential. To
advance the Regional Growth Strategy adopted in VISION 2040, promote economic development,
and realize the multiple public benefits of compact growth around rapid transit investments, the
signatories to this Compact will strive to:
• Use a full range of tools, investments, and economic development strategies, to attract the
potential demand for residential and commercial transit oriented development within transit
communities consistent with and in furtherance of regional policies and plans, and
• Plan for and promote residential and employment densities within transit communities that
support ridership potential and contribute to accommodating growth needs within each high -
capacity transit corridor.
Additional transit communities along the region's other high- capacity transit mode corridors will also
attract significant portions of future residential and employment growth.
Provide housing choices affordable to a full range of incomes near high- capacity transit.
Adopted regional policy recognizes housing as a basic human need and calls for local policies and
tools that provide for an adequate supply of housing affordable at all income levels, to meet the
diverse needs of both current and future residents. Region -wide, affordable housing need is defined
by current household incomes, where 18% of households earn between 50% and 80% of AMI, 12%
earn between 30% and 50% of AMI, and 13% earn less than 30% of AMI. In transit communities,
projected need for affordable housing is higher, especially for households in the lowest income range
due to their greater reliance on transit. Depending on local market conditions, efforts to meet that
need will focus on new housing, housing preservation, or combined strategies.
In order to meet a substantial portion of this need within walking distance of rapid transit services,
the signatories to this Compact will strive to:
• Use a full range of housing preservation tools to maintain the existing level of affordable housing
within each transit community, and
• Use a full range of housing production tools and incentives to provide sufficient affordable
housing choices for all economic and demographic groups within transit corridors, including -new
housing in the region's transit communities collectively that is proportional to region -wide need or
greater to serve transit - dependent households.
Growing Transit Communities Compact 1 August 23, 2013 5
113
These goals apply to the region's transit corridors collectively, and do not suggest a specific desired
outcome for any individual transit community. Further, fully attaining these goals will require new
tools, resources, and subsidies beyond those that exist today.
Increase access to opportunity for existing and future residents of transit communities.
Adopted regional policy recognizes the need to address the diverse housing, transportation and
economic needs of current and future residents so that all people may prosper as the region grows.
This requires special attention to communities that lack access to transportation choices, quality
schools, and other social and physical neighborhood components that allow community members to
thrive and succeed.
In order to more equitably meet the needs of all residents of the region, the signatories to this
Compact will strive to:
• Improve access to opportunity in the transit corridors through targeted investments that meet the
needs of residents and businesses in communities with limited access to opportunity, targeted
affordable housing investments in communities with good access to opportunity, and transit
connections linking areas with good access to opportunity and areas with limited access to
opportunity.
• Use a full range of community engagement strategies to increase the involvement of diverse and
historically under - represented groups in transit community development, empower communities
to influence decisions at all levels of government, and ensure opportunities for participation
throughout decision - making processes.
In order to maximize this historic opportunity, show regional leadership, and act as a national model of how diverse
stakeholders can make transformative decisions that advance a region's goals for its people, its prosperity, and the
planet, the signatories to this Compact pledge to work individually and collaboratively toward the goals described
above, and toward the implementation of the Growing Transit Communities Strategy, as appropriate to each
jurisdiction and organization. PSRC will periodically convene representatives of Compact signatories as an Advisory
Committee to evaluate the region's progress over time toward achieving equitable transit communities. PSRC's
regional monitoring program will track progress of implementing and achieving the goals described in this compact.
Growing Transit Communities Compact 1 August 23, 2013 6
114
Signatories to the Growing Transit Communities Compact
Name, Title, Organization Date
Name, Title, Organization Date
Name, Title, Organization Date
Name, Title, Organization Date
Name, Title, Organization Date
Name, Title, Organization Date
Name, Title, Organization Date
Name, Title, Organization Date
Name, Title, Organization Date
For more information on the Growing Transit Communities Partnership, please contact Program Manager
Ben Bakkenta (bbakkenta@psrc.org or 205 - 971 -3236) or visit. the Growing Transit Communities website at
http: / /www.psrc.org /growth /growing- transit- communities/
Growing Transit Communities Compact 1 August 23, 2013 7
115
Crowing Transit Communities Strategy
Executive Summary
Our region has a shared vision for a sustainable future that will benefit our people, our prosperity, and our planet. VISION
2040, the central Puget Sound region's long -range plan for growth, transportation, and economic development, describes
the commitments, actions, and stewardship needed over many decades by many stakeholders to achieve far- reaching
goals. As the region grows to 5 million people —a more than 30 percent increase —by the year 2040, a key goal calls for
growth within existing urban areas and especially in compact, walkable communities that are linked by transit.
The region's recent commitments to invest over $15 billion in high- capacity transit (light rail, bus rapid transit, express bus,
streetcar, and commuter rail) present an once -in -a- lifetime opportunity to locate housing, jobs, and services close to these
transit investments, and to do so in a way that benefits surrounding communities. A region -wide coalition of businesses,
developers, local governments, transit agencies, and nonprofit organizations —the Growing Transit Communities
Partnership —spent three years working together to create solutions that will encourage high - quality, equitable development
around rapid transit,
The Challenges
Growth, as envisioned in VISION 2040, should benefit all people by increasing economic development and access to jobs,
expanding housing and transportation choices, promoting neighborhood character and vitality, and improving public health
and environmental quality. But, this is easier said than done. In particular, this growth may magnify several challenges
currently facing the region:
Living in and working in walkable, transit - served communities. Recent market studies show that there
is significant unmet demand for housing and jobs located within walking distance of transit. Many people
want to live and work in compact, complete, and connected communities, but investments in transit and in
transit station areas have fallen behind. Attracting growth to transit communities will require policies to
encourage more housing and jobs near transit along with investments in the infrastructure and services for
a growing population.
Housing choices for low and moderate income households near transit. Forty -three percent of the
region's households make less than 80 percent of the area median income. However, most new market -
rate housing that is accessible to transit is unaffordable to these households. With new investment in
transit communities, many lower -cost units are at risk of displacement. For the lowest income households,
many of whom are transit dependent, the supply of subsidized housing is far short of the need. Building
mixed - income communities that meet these needs will require improved strategies to minimize
displacement, and preserve and produce diverse housing types affordable to a full range of incomes.
Equitable access to opportunity for all the region's residents. Analysis of indicators across the region
reveals that too many people do not have access to education, employment, mobility, health, and
neighborhood services and amenities. These community resources are the building blocks that create the
opportunity to succeed and thrive in life. Transit communities, with their access to the region's jobs,
institutions, and services are critical focal points for achieving greater equity for the region's diverse
residents. As these communities grow through public and private investment, equitable development will
require targeted community improvements and strategies to connect existing and future residents to
greater regional resources.
Attachment C
116
Why Now?
In the last decade, central Puget Sound voters have approved a series of high- capacity light rail and other transit
investments —a commitment of approximately $15 billion —that will serve the region's most densely populated and diverse
communities for decades to come. These investments present an once -in -a- lifetime
opportunity to support and improve existing communities and meet regional goals
through strategies to make great places for people to live and work. In order to do this,
the region must:
Leverage transit investment to build sustainable communities. Transit investments,
such as light rail, streetcars, commuter rail, and bus rapid transit, create value by
connecting communities to the larger region. Transit communities are the best
opportunity for the region to become more sustainable, prosperous, and equitable.
Create new resources and tools. Current resources available to governmental and
non - governmental agencies alike are not enough. New tools and funding sources will be
necessary to meet infrastructure, economic development, housing, and other community
needs.
Work together across the region and across sectors. It will take collaboration among
a wide spectrum of public, private, and nonprofit agencies and organizations working
together to promote thriving and equitable transit communities. There are roles for
everyone in this process.
The Strategy
How will this all be accomplished? The Growing Transit Communities Strategy calls for regional and local actions that
respond to the challenges and opportunities in transit communities and represent major steps toward implementing the
growth strategy in VISION 2040. The Strategy was developed by the Growing Transit Communities Partnership, an advisory
body of various public, private, and nonprofit agencies and organizations working together to promote successful transit
communities. The Growing Transit Communities Partnership, funded by a three -year grant from the federal Partnership for
Sustainable Communities and housed at the Puget Sound Regional Council, established three main goals for the Strategy:
• Attract more of the region's residential and employment growth near high- capacity transit
• Provide housing choices affordable to a full range of incomes near high- capacity transit
• Increase access to opportunity for existing and future community members in transit communities
Too/kit of Strategies and Actions
Twenty -four strategies, guided by a People + Place Implementation Typology, constitute the "playbook" for the Growing
Transit Communities Strategy. From overarching regional approaches to local and individual actions, together these provide
a set of coordinated steps toward ensuring a prosperous, sustainable, and equitable future.
The Strategy presents 24 strategies recommended by the Growing Transit Communities Partnership and includes specific
actions for PSRC, transit agencies, local governments, and other regional partners. The recommendations address the three
main goals for transit communities. As a whole, the strategies are a call to action for partners across the region to redouble
efforts to create great urban places and build equitable communities around transit. Fully recognizing the strong policy
foundation embodied in regional and local plans, as well as the innovative work in implementing those plans to date, the
Partnership makes these recommendations as a challenge to do more than is being doing today.
117
The Toolkit of Strategies and Actions fall into four groupings:
The Foundation Strategies recommend a regional and local framework for ongoing work to support transit communities.
Modeled on the relationships and values at the heart of the Growing Transit Communities Partnership, these strategies
envision an ongoing regional effort involving a variety of partners and community members in decision making and
implementation at all levels.
The Strategies to Attract Housing and Employment Growth recommend actions to make great urban places that are
attractive to households and businesses, remove barriers to development, and support development in emerging markets.
The Strategies to Provide Affordable Housing Choices recommended actions to define and quantify housing needs,
preserve existing affordable housing and supply new housing choices, and capitalize on the value created by the private
market — enhanced by transit investments —in order to achieve the broadest range of affordability in transit communities.
The Strategies to Increase Access to Opportunity recommend actions to understand regional disparities in access to
opportunity, identify existing and potential new resources and tools to meet community needs, and build support for
equitable opportunities through education, coalitions, and leadership.
1. Establish a regional
program to support
thriving and equitable
transit communities
2. Build partnerships and
promote collaboration
3. Engage effectively with
community
stakeholders
4. Build capacity for
community
engagement
5. Evaluate and monitor
impacts and outcomes
6. Conduct station area
planning
7. Use land efficiently in
transit communities
8. Locate, design, and
provide access to
transit stations to
support TOD
9. Adopt innovative
parking tools
10. Invest in infrastructure
and public realm
improvements
11. Assess current and
future housing needs in
transit communities
12. Minimize displacement
through preservation
and replacement
13. Increase housing
support transit -
dependent populations
14. Implement a TOD
property acquisition
fund
15. Expand value capture
financing as a tool for
infrastructure and
affordable housing
16. Make surplus public
lands available for
affordable housing
17. Leverage market value
through incentives
18. Implement regional fair
housing assessment
Acces
Oppo
19. Assess community
needs
20. Invest in environmental
and public health
21. Invest in economic
vitality and opportunity
22. Invest in equitable
mobility options
23. Invest in equitable
access to high quality
education
24. Invest in public safety
in transit communities
Successful implementation will require shared commitment and collaboration among governments, major stakeholders, and
community members. There are roles for many different regional and local partners, each with a distinct jurisdiction,
authority, and mission. Consistent with those roles, all are asked to use the Toolkit of Strategies and Actions as a "playbook"
118
for taking action to advance the regional vision of creating thriving and equitable transit communities in a manner that is a
best fit to each community.
People f Place Implementation Typology
No two transit communities are alike. Accordingly, there is no one -size-
fits -all approach to the strategies that will help a transit community thrive a plemtation
approaches
and grow with equitable outcomes for current and future community
members. The Strategy presents the People + Place Implementation
Typology as a regional framework for local implementation. Working
with stakeholders from each of three major light rail corridors, the trransFZcorn
Growing Transit Communities Partnership analyzed conditions in 74
study areas as a basis for a set of locally tailored recommendations.
Based on indicators of the physical, economic, and social conditions in
each transit community, the results of this typology analysis suggest
eight Implementation Approaches. Key strategies and investments
address the needs and opportunities in different communities, while also advancing regional and corridor -wide goals. The
Implementation Approaches and typology analysis are intended to complement and inform existing regional and, especially,
local plans as they are implemented, evaluated, and refined in the coming years.
The Next Steps
The Growing Transit Communities Strategy includes a three -part implementation
plan to promote thriving and equitable transit communities in the central Puget
Sound region. The Regional Compact affirms the support of a variety of partners
from throughout the region for the Partnership's work and a commitment to work
toward regional goals by implementing the Strategy. The Toolkit of Strategies and
Actions and the People + Place Implementation Typology, as described above
and detailed in the body of this report, include 24 recommended strategies, eight
implementation approaches, and corridor specific priorities that will guide an evolving
approach to transit communities. The Individual Work Plans are local government,
agency, or organization specific work plans, to be developed individually and in
consultation with PSRC staff, which define short- and medium -term actions that can
implement the Strategy. The nature and format of the Individual Work Plans will vary
to reflect the diversity of public and private partners, legislative and decision - making
processes, and actions adopted.
By working together, the central Puget Sound region can achieve its vision for a sustainable future that advances our
people, our prosperity, and our planet. The Growing Transit Communities Strategy lays out essential tools and actions to get
us there.
September 2013. For more information on the Growing Transit Communities Strategy,
please visit www.nsrc.orq.
119
120
SOUTH COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION BOARD (SCATBd)
October 15, 2013
MEETING SUMMARY
Members
Mayor Pete Lewis (Chair)
Councilmember Marcie Palmer (Vice - Chair)
Councilmember Kate Kruller
Councilmember Wayne Snoey
Councilmember Carol Benson
Mayor Dave Hill
Councilmember Dana Ralph
Stacy Trussler
Andrew Glass Hastings
Councilmember Garry Ladenburg
Brian Ziegler
Rick Perez
Councilmember Bill Peloza
Councilmember Stacia Jenkins
I. Open Meeting
City of Auburn
City of Renton
City of Tukwila
City of Covington
City of Black Diamond (Alternate)
City of Algona
City of Kent (Alternate)
WSDOT
King County Executive (Alternate)
City of SeaTac
Pierce County (Alternate)
City of Federal Way (Alternate)
City of Auburn (Alternate)
City of Normandy Park
After opening comments and introductions the Board approved the meeting summary for
the September 17, 2013 SCATBd meeting.
II. Reports
Chair Lewis asked for volunteers for the nominating subcommittee for SCATBd's 2014
Officers, Councilmembers Kruller, Ladenburg, and Jenkins volunteered to serve on the
nominating subcommittee. Chair Lewis also asked for volunteers for a subcommittee to
review the SCATBd Procedures document, Councilmembers Snoey, Palmer, and Peloza
volunteered to serve on the subcommittee.
Chair Lewis urged members to attend the legislative listening sessions being held though
out the area. Chair Lewis asked that Board members talk about our transportation funding
crisis it terms of it impacting local jobs and the economy. Board members asked the Chair
to send them for 4 or 5 talking points to help highlight this funding crisis message with
State Legislators.
III. City of Kent, South Central Ave Rehabilitation Project Update, Mark Howlett
Mark Howlett, Design Engineer Manager for the City of Kent, briefed the Board on Kent's
Central Avenue South rehabilitation project. Mr. Howlett said that Central Avenue is a
principle arterial that connects the urban centers of Kent and Auburn and carries about
121
27,000 vehicles per day. He said that the closure of the Alvord T Bridge has also increased
traffic volumes on Central Avenue, and it also serves as a relief route for SR 167. He said
the pavement on Central Avenue is failing in many locations and there are substandard and
missing sidewalk sections along the length of the project. The rehabilitation project
includes full width overlay of the entire roadway to add additional service life to the road,
replace the curbs, gutters and sidewalks, and some minor drainage system improvements.
Mr. Howlett said the total project cost was $5 million, and about $4.2 million is unfunded.
IV. King County Snow /Ice Response Plan, Chris Wierzbicki
Chris Wierzbicki, King County Road Services Division Deputy Director, briefed Board
members on King County's snow and ice response plan. Mr. Wierzbicki said in 2010, when
the last major snow and ice event occurred, King County was able to plow about 30% of is
unincorporated area roads. He said that because off current revenue shortfalls, King County
will only be able to plow of 10% of those unincorporated area roads in the event of a snow
and ice storm. King County Road Service Division gets most of its money from property
taxes, and property tax revenues have dropped by 44% since 2009. This drop in drop in
property tax revenues has resulted in a third reduction in King County Road Services
Division funding. He said King County has lost about 50% of its employees, including staff
that are certified to work on snow and ice removal. Mr. Wierzbicki said that unincorporated
area residents will have limited access to and from their homes, and said that they will have
to start planning ahead in the event of a snow and ice storm. He said King County is
working with cities to coordinate snow and ice response efforts.
Board members said that the County and SCATBd jurisdictions should put together a map
that shows cities and county corridors that will be plowed in a snow or ice events. Mr.
Wierzbicki mentioned the King County Road Alert website and said the County received
grant funds to encourage a partnership with cities in sharing road- related information on the
County's Road Alert web page including snow and ice event information. Board members
also mentioned that Metro Transit has developed a countywide map transit snow routes.
Board members also asked their public works staff to discuss possible opportunities to
assist the County to plow arterials in unincorporated islands such as King County's Central
Avenue South between Kent and Auburn.
V. Washington State Rail Plan Update, Keri Woehler. (1.22)
Keri Woehler, WSDOT's Rail Operations Program Manager, briefed the Board on the draft
Washington State Rail Plan. Ms. Woehler said the draft Plan was released for public review
and comments are due to WSDOT by December 2, 2013. She said the purpose of the Rail
Plan is to fulfill federal and state requirements; and provides an integrated plan for freight
and passenger rail, and includes 5 and 20 year rail funding strategies. She said the plan .
builds on previous rail plans and will serve as a strategic blueprint for future public
investment in the state's rail transportation system.
Ms. Woehler highlighted the current strengths of Washington's rail system. She said the
system currently providing good mobility for existing train volumes, provides an extensive
2
122
rail network that connects citizens and industry, and is a fuel - efficient passenger and freight
transportation mode. She said future rail challenges include meeting future demand,
preserving access to national and global markets, short rail line modernization and
compatibility with Class I railroads; increasing ridership on intercity passenger rail, and
maintaining a safe rail system.
The draft Plan identified the rail system needs which included addressing constraints to
ensure that rail capacity meets future demand, preserve the existing rail capacity and
infrastructure, and enhancing the efficiency and reliability of existing services. The draft
plan recommends that State action and investments in rail be based on performance
measures, and continued incremental improvement of intercity passenger rail needs. Ms.
Woehler said the next steps included finalizing the Washington State Rail Plan in
December 2013, incorporate the results into State's Freight Mobility Plan and Washington
Transportation Plan; and to continue collaborative planning with rail stakeholders and
partners to refine and focus investment priorities.
The Board asked staff to draft a SCATBd Rail Plan comment letter that addresses grade
separation projects, the looming freight mobility crisis, and the passenger rail. Board
members recommended that the comment letter be based on the SCATBd letter that was
sent to Governor Inslee in August that highlighting the need for a transportation funding
package.
Other Attendees:
Brandon Carver, Des Moines
Torn Gut, SeaTac
Mark Howlett, Kent
Chad Bieren, Kent
Jeremy Jewkes, WSDOT
Chris Wierzbicki, King County
Susan Oxholm, King County
Dan Anderson, King County
Keri Woehler, WSDOT
Denis Dowdy, Auburn
Cathy Mooney, Kent
3
123
SOUTH COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION BOARD (SCATBd)
OPERATING PROCEDURES
Revised , 2013
The purpose of these procedures is to guide the conduct of business of the South County Area
Transportation Board (SCATBd) and its Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). These
procedures shall be reviewed and revised annually as needed.
I. SOUTH COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION BOARD (SCATBd)
A. Mission:
The Board shall serve as a South County forum for information sharing, consensus
building, and coordination to resolve transportation issues, identify priorities, and
promote transportation plans and programs that benefit the South County area
(Mission Statement adopted January 16, 1996)
B. Goals:
(Goals adopted July 19th, 1994. and subsequently amended)
Goal 1: Develop and promote a transportation system that will provide
personal mobility choices for South County residents consistent with
the transportation goals of the Growth Management Act and
Goal 2 Develop and promote transportation and related actions that
accommodate economic development, through efficient movement
of people, freight, and goods within the South County and
contiguous areas.
C. Role:
The SCATBd is the forum established for the South King County area at which
elected officials may provide input into local, regional, state and federal
transportation- related issues or any other related issues as the members determine.
D. Membership and Voting:
Membership shall be extended to the following local jurisdictions and agencies. The
Board shall operate by consensus whenever possible, but in those matters requiring a
vote, voting shall he assigned as indicated below:
124
2
The voting members of SCATBd and their voting rights shall be as follows:
Full Voting Members
Number of
Reps.
Voting Rights
Sound
Transit
Metro
Transit
Membership
and Dues'
Sound
Transit
Metro
Transit3
Regional
Competition°
Other'
City of Algona
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
City of Auburn
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
City of Black Diamond
1
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
City ofBurien
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
City of Covington
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
City of Des Moines
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
City of Enumclaw
1
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
City of Federal Way
1
Yes
Yes
Yes '.
Yes
Yes
City of Kent
1
Yes
Yes
Yes '
Yes
Yes
City of Maple Valley
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
City of Milton
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
City of Normandy Park
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
City of Renton
1
Yes
Yes
Yes* '
Yes
City of SeaTac
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
City of Tukwila
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
City of Pacific
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
1
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
King County
3
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
The limited voting members of SCATBd and their voting rights shall be as follows:
Limited Voting Members
Number of
Reps.
Voting Rights
Membership
and Dues .
Sound
Transit
Metro
Transit
Regional
Competition
Other
1
Pierce County
1
No
No
No
No
Yes
The non - voting members of SCATBd shall be as follows:
Non - Voting Member
Number of Representatives
Pierce Transit
1
Port of Seattle
1
Port of Tacoma
1
Puget Sound Regional Council
1
South Sound Chambers of CommerceCoalition
1
Sound Transit
1
Washington State Department of Transportation
1
'Administrative issues, such: additional members and use of dues
' Recommendations to Sound :Transit on policies and capital and service plans and implementation
3 Recommendations to King County Metro Transit on policies and capital and service plans and implementation
4 identification of projects for the regional competition, if prescribed by process approved by the King County caucus of the
Transportation Policy Board ( *projects in Renton south of the Cedar River)
Other recommendations including
• Recommendations to WSDOT on policies, programs and projects.
• Recommendations to the PSRC on plans, policies, programs and projects such as the Transportation 2040 update and
regional funding policies, strategies or programs.
• Input to the State Legislature and committees and commissions established by the Legislature on transportation policy,
budget and priorities and legislative proposals and studies.
• Recommendations to the federal delegation on federal legislation including reauthorization and funding priorities and
other transportation - related programs.
2
125
3
Other limited voting and non - voting members may be added as the Board determines. Each
limited voting and non - voting member should appoint one representative and one alternate to the
Board. The limited voting member designated alternate may vote in place of designated limited
voting representatives in the absence of the designated limited voting representative.
E. Officers:
1. Chair: Responsible for 1) conducting and ensuring fair opportunity for
discussion, 2) signing correspondence and speaking on behalf of SCATBd, 3)
providing direction on agenda preparation.
2. Vice - Chair: Responsible to act as chair in his /her absence.
3. Term of Office: One year from January. Elections in. December
4. Officers must be elected officials
F. Meeting Schedule:
The regular meeting date for SCATBd shall be the third Tuesday of the month, from
9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. The meeting location shall be held at an appropriate location
within South King County. The agenda package shall be distributed in advance of the
meeting. Adjustments to the regular meeting schedule and meeting location shall
occur as needed.
G. Board Actions Require a Quorum of Full Voting Members:
1. A quorum is: 50 percent plus 1 full voting members.'
2. Type of Actions Board Can Take: The Board may undertake activities
consistent with its purpose and shall prepare an annual work program for the
following year for submittal to its member jurisdictions by January 31 of each
year.
3. Type of Actions Board Cannot Take: The Board cannot take action to
approve /disapprove or adopt any position on behalf of member
jurisdictions /agencies without authorization to do so from those jurisdictions.
In issuing communication or statements, it should be made clear that the Board
is not acting on behalf of its member jurisdictions /agencies.
4. Schedule for Action Items: Action items will be presented at one meeting and
acted on at a second meeting unless three - quarters of the voting Board members
present agree that the circumstances require action to be taken at that time
PROVIDED that there is a quorum of voting members (at least 50 percent plus
one).
5. Minority Statements: Any individual full voting Board member or limited
voting member -shall have the right at the time of the vote to request that a
statement of a minority position be included in Board communications or
otherwise distributed with an approved Board statement.
11. Subcommittees of the Board:
Subcommittees of the Board shall be established as needed.
3
126
4
II. TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
A. Purpose:
The TAC shall provide technical assistance as requested by the Board and shall
advise the Board on emergent transportation issues for the Board's consideration
including regional project identification and countywide project selection.
B. Membership:
Each SCATBd member (full, limited, or non - voting member) shall appoint an
appropriate representative to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC).
C. Meeting Schedule:
The TAC shall meet when requested by the Board to provide technical assistance and
advise on emergent transportation issues.
III. OTHER
A. Standard Agenda:
'The SCATBd agenda shall follow this standard format unless unusual circumstances
require a different arrangement.
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Minutes
3. Report of the Chair
4. Communications and Citizens Requests to Comment
5. Major Agenda Topics
B. Audience Comments during Meetings:
At the Chair's discretion, comments may be taken from the audience. The Chair
should call on audience members wishing to make comments. SCATBd members
can ask to have audience members speak. Audience comments should be limited to
two minutes.
C. Distribution of Materials:
Letters and documents may be distributed with the agenda at the direction of the
Chair as authorized by the policies and procedures of the jurisdiction providing staff
support.
D. Citizen Involvement:
Interested citizen groups shall be placed on the distribution list for Board meetings to
ensure that those groups are kept informed of Board activities.
4
127
South County Area Transportation Board
MS: KSC -TR -0814
201 South Jackson Street
Seattle, WA 98104 -3856
Phone: (206) 684 -1417 Fax: (206) 684 -2111
Date, 2013
Ron Pate, Rail Director
PO Box 47407
310 Maple Park Avenue SE
Olympia, WA 98504 -7407
Dear Mr. Pate,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Washington State Rail Plan, public review
draft. The South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd) is a collaborative effort of local
elected officials who are committed to improving the region's transportation system. SCATBd
represents an area that encompasses 15 south King County cities including 690,000 city and
county residents, and is home to over 300,000 jobs. The south King County area also has one of
the largest manufacturing and industrial areas in the Pacific Northwest, and our area's
transportation system plays an important role in supporting the economic vitality of the region
and state through the efficient movement of people and goods. The two Class 1 rail lines run
north /south thought the South King County area.
Local Transportation Funding Short -Falls
The draft plan forecasts increasing demand for passenger and freight rail services in Washington
State, and an increase in rail traffic will affect traffic delay and safety at grade crossings in our
valley cities. Table D1 of the draft plan lists a number of partially funded and unfunded grade
separation projects in the south King County area. However, because of mounting funding
shortfalls, SCATBd jurisdictions are unable to fund these needed grade separation projects.
SCATBd members recommend the draft plan highlight the local agency funding shortfalls for
these grade separation projects and the impacts of not building these grade separation projects on
the movement of people and freight. In order to continue and facilitate state -level revenue and
funding discussions, we need to acknowledge our local funding shortfalls in our various local
and state transportation planning documents such as the Washington State Rail Plan and the
Washington State Freight Mobility Plan.
At -Grade Crossings Transportation Impacts to Local Communities
One of the themes that emerged from the draft Washington State Rail Plan stakeholders outreach
efforts included community impacts of rail. Stakeholders identified the need to address traffic
congestion and safety at at -grade crossings, and to evaluate opportunities for freight and
passenger rail to contribute to local economic development. The draft rail plan section entitled
"Challenges and Other Issues Facing Class 1 Rail Roads, Relationships Between Communities
and Class 1 Railroads (page 46)" should be expanded to include a more in -depth analysis on the
impacts of freight rail and passenger rail traffic at grade crossings. The analysis should include a
focus on the impacts of freight and passenger rail operations on surface movement of people and
Algona • Auburn • Black Diamond e Burien • Covington • Des Moines • Enumclaw • Federal Way • Kent • King County • Maple valley
Mucldeshoot Indian Tribe • Normandy Park e Renton • SeaTac • Tukwila • Pacific • Pierce County • Pierce Transit • Port of Seattle • Port of
Tacoma • Puget Sound Regional Council • South Sound Chambers of Commerce Coalition • Sound Transit • Transportation Improvement
Board • Washington State Department of Transportation • Washington State Transportation Commission
128
freight at grade crossings. The analysis should also include the economic and social impacts of
travel delays experienced by travel of emergency vehicles, truck freight traffic, passenger
vehicles, and transit.
Impacts of Potential Increase in Coal and Crude Oil Train Traffic
SCATBd would also like to see an expanded discussion and analysis on the impacts of potential
coal and crude oil train traffic on track availability for freight /trade movement of goods in and
out of our region. Currently, several proposals are under consideration to enhance port capacity,
including a bulk coal export facility at Cherry Point in Whatcom County. If the Cherry Point
bulk export facility were to be developed, it could add up to eighteen, mile- and -a -half long trains
per day. Oil refineries in our state have typically received crude oil shipments from Alaska and
elsewhere by ship, barges or pipelines, but refiners are increasingly turning to trains to take
advantage of a boom in oil from North Dakota's Bakken region. This potential increase in coal
and crude oil trail traffic could result in significant impacts to both current and future freight and
passenger train traffic in our state.
This potential increase in coal and crude oil train traffic is a major concern for SCATBd
members because of the potential impacts to South King County cities and our regional
economy. Our region's economy relies on the rail corridor to move parts and finished projects
and an increase in coal and crude oil train traffic could impact existing and future rail - dependent
economic development. This increase in coal and crude oil train traffic would also have
significant impacts at grade crossings, impacting the flow of freight and goods flowing to and
from our ports to the industrial and warehousing areas in the Green River Valley area.
SCATBd supports the draft rail plan's vision that is guided by the six transportation system
policy goals established by the state legislature which includes: economic vitality, preservation,
safety, mobility, environment, and stewardship. SCATBd members are keenly aware of the
economic importance of Washington's freight and passenger rail system and the key role it plays
in the multimodal transportation system that keeps people, freight and goods moving in
Washington State. Our local transportation systems also provide an important foundation for
Washington's economy. It provides the vital connections that link our homes to our work places
and carry products to Inarkef
Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft Washington State Rail Plan and if
you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Pete Lewis Marcie Palmer
Chair Vice Chair
South County Area Transportation Boar
Algona • Auburn • Black Diamond • Burien • Covington • Des Moines • Enumclaw • Federal Way • Kent • King County • Maple Valley •
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe • Normandy Park • Renton • Seaiac • Tukwila • Pacific • Pierce County • Pierce Transit • Port of Seattle • Port of
Tacoma • Puget Sound Regional Council • South Sound Chambers of Commerce Coalition • Sound Transit • Transportation Improvement
Board • Washington State Department of Transportation • Washington State Transportation Commission
129
SOUTH COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION BOARD (SCATBd)
MEETING
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
9:00 — 11:00 a.m,
SeaTac City Hall
4800 South 188th Street
SeaTac
AGENDA
1.
Open Meeting
• Introductions
• Approve summary of October 15, 2013
SCATBd Meeting (Attachment A)
Action
9:00 a.m.
2.
Reports, Communications and Citizen
Requests to Comment
• Chair or Vice Chair
• Participant Updates from RTC and
Other Regional Committees
• Legislative Update
• Report SCATBd Agreement
Subcommittee (Attachment B)
• Report from the Officers Nominating
Committee
• Citizen Comment
Reports and
Discussion
9:05 a,m.
3.
Washington Rail Plan SCATBd Comment
Letter (Attachment C)
Report and
Discussion
9:40 a.m.
4.
Metro Service Reduction Proposal - Victor
Obeso, Metro Service Development Manager
Report and
Discussion
10:00 a.m.
5.
Sound Transit Long Range Plan Briefing —
Chelsea Levy, Sound Transit
Report and
Discussion
10:30 a.m,
130