Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2007-07-09 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET Tukwila City Council Agenda o J` 9 s�' COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE f i t 11 r% O Steven M. Mullet Mayor Councilmembers: Joe Duffie Joan Hernandez `n Rhonda Berry, City Administrator Pam Carter Jim Haggerton isos Verna Griffin, Council President Pamela Linder Dennis Robertson MONDAY, July 9, 2007; 7:00 PM Tukwila City Hall; Council Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. CITIZEN At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included COMMENT on this agenda (please limit your comments to five minutes per citizen). To comment on an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is presented for discussion. 3. SPECIAL ISSUES a. Bid rejection for Green River Pedestrian and Utility Bridge Repairs Pg.1 and Sealing. b. Tukwila International Boulevard Phase 2 and 3 Improvements Pg.9 right -of- way /condemnation ordinance. c. Emergency Advisory AM Radio System. Pg.99 d. Code Amendments: 1) An ordinance to raise the threshold for SEPA environmental Pg.113 review to 12,000 square feet and 40 parking stalls for commercial /industrial construction and nine dwelling units for residential construction, and adopt the Optional Determination of Non significance (DNS) Process under WAC 197 -11 -355. 2) An ordinance to create a process for determining the number of Pg.123 wetland mitigation credits required for off -site mitigation. 3) An ordinance to restrict expansion of houses into non- Pg.141 conforming setbacks. 4) An ordinance to allow retaining walls up to four feet high in Pg.146 setbacks, under certain conditions. 5) An ordinance to provide an Administrative Lot Area Variance Pg.153 in the LDR Zone and update the permit classification table. 4. REPORTS a. Mayor c. Staff e. Intergovernmental b. City Council d. City Attorney 5. MISCELLANEOUS 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION 7. ADJOURNMENT Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible. Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice to the City Clerk's Office 206 433 1800 /WD 206 248 2933. This notice is available at ww and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities. Tukwila Council meetings are audio taped. w COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS ti Initials ITEM NO. 0 Y 1� Meeting Date 1 Prepared by Mayor's review 1 Council review Q= 14'9' •:r 7/09/07 1 BG AMA AfrY vo rr fi r_" 7/16/07 1 BG `ekf1' I a rsoa 1 I u 1 1 1 1 ITEM INFORMATION CAS NUMBER: 07-087 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: JULY 9, 2007 AGENDA ITEM TITLE Reject all bids for Green River Pedestrian and Utility Bridge Project CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other Mtg Date 7/09/07 Mtg Date Mtg Date 7/16/07 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PW/ SPONSOR'S Four bids were submitted for the repair and sealing of the Green River Pedestrian and SUMMARY Utility Bridge. The bids were within the budget however all of the bidders were non responsive to the experience requirement. None of the submitters had worked on wood bridges over water, which requires special expertise to protect the bridge and the environment. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F&S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DAZE: 6/25/07 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPoNsoR /ADMIN. Reject all bids by resolution. colvDdri rEE Unanimous approval; forward to COW. COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 104.01 Bridges (page 31, 2007 CIP) Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 7/09/07 7/16/07 MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS 7/09/07 Information Memo dated June 19, 2007 Map of bridge location Bid Tabulation Resolution rejecting all bids Transportation Committee Minutes from June 25, 2007 7/16/07 INFORMATION MEMO To: Mayor Mullet From: Public Works Directod Date: June 19, 2007 Subject: Green River Pedestrian and Utility Bridge No. 0000TUK18 Project No. 07 -RWO2 BID REJECTION ISSUE Reject all bids for repairs and sealing the Green River Pedestrian and Utility Bridge. BACKGROUND This project was designed to provide repairs and sealing of the Green River Pedestrian Bridge on the Green River Trail near South 180 Street and Andover Park East. The repairs include replacement of the wooden deck and repairs to deteriorating sections of the bridge truss. The sealing includes coating the entire bridge with a stain/sealant to preserve the wood from further deterioration. The project was advertised for bids on May 31 and June 7 and bids were opened June 15, 2007. Four bids were received with the apparent low bid of $209,500.00 from Cadence Construction. The engineer's estimate was $192,100. ANALYSIS The bids were reviewed and tabulated and no errors or irregularities were found in the bids. However, the apparent low bidder and the other bidders, are non responsive to the experience requirement. Cadence Construction has worked primarily on residential renovation projects up to $55,000 with no experience working on a wooden truss bridge over water. Further, the remaining three bidders have worked on similar size projects, but none with wood bridges over water. Working with wood bridges and work over the river requires special expertise to protect the bridge and the environment. RECOMMENDATION Reject all bids for the construction bid for the Green River Pedestrian and Utility Bridge and re- design and re- advertise in two packages. The first package will be bridge repair and the second will be bridge painting. attachments: Vicinity Map Bid Tabulation Bid Rejection Resolution (P- Projxts\A- RW RS Projxcs \OTRWO2 Gr Riv Pod BiGr Riv Ped Br Bid Rcjewo¢ Info Memo) ibu 4 Evans! 1 Black Dr s u, St D° a S S 161 Baker Blvd 1 �°St b2 °�P t S 164 I v w S trander Blvd ���i��� S 164 St a -0 c R Q a (.1 T reck '`t S 166S Dr J Q� c n );//t ro S 168 St 4; 4 c Corporate -5 Drive N Corporate Drive S Mink -er B vd s i l Ct ~z?a �5 U land Dr Upland Y Te Q Q 3 r Mi dland Dr r, i r Sa xon s ti 'Drive l s' Q p D c f q) St Triland Dr i in ro VI S 180 St h Q SW43St to Segale Pk Dr x S 18i r------. %Ri vers i de /'J 5 4 Q. -3-:- 4 I C') Dr .7/ ft) je a Q Q n, a P �O a To `Z dd Q is Q S P 9a/ �QO� Bl ve- a j 3 Low Dion h e park ltr t A C l ,.y� S Glacier St 6-1 le B 2 cu ,65 ti I 5 Q �4 Green River Ped Utility Bridge 364 L4 Repairs and Maintenance 1. City of Tukwila Vicinity rf z Map d M ay 8 2007 ms s iso8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 co 0 0 0 0 coor- 000 0 -a: m 0 0 (O to 6) N O L() 00 a L N CO 0) N 0 m n a) 0 c W 0 0 0 0 0 0 V o o 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 07-rw02 0 N. 0 0 0 0 C_ Q a C7 O 1` O O O C- O W 1- N 1n M� 0 1.6 Z r o o o oo o 0 0 V o oo_ D o_ o D o_ oo oo 0 0 0 N N 0 M CO L y- N a) W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 N a0 N 0 O 10 Z r o O o 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO N 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 r` CO to CO O O to U jr coon) o C r N 0 o W 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co (O 0 o Ti ocfloo O e a N. co Lc)c) co 1- Q C I� O to t Z N d' T J 0 Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 o 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 0 1- 00o cc) 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (n o o o in 0 0 10 E 0 rtnO Lc) oO o o o00r`oo r` 0 W U M CO O 0)) of 0 co U M CO O to 0 CO i W 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C O O Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q d 0 0 0 1` 0 0 M 'a a r to O to O O 0 0 N 0 to C W Z M Tt co o Z 0 co r co Tr r Z Z J -1 -1 J LL u. 0 I- Z J J J J L1 LL 0 I- f m a Z 2 a Z Z o 0 0 M N a m Q a) Q V u) CC a) co E a) m c r 0 0 ca 0 rn_ cc d v) L c U (1) k c U Q J n LD a a y n i m d d Q to 'L C O Q y C O co 10 it tC O` 0 RS O c 0 6 O i O N- fa Y dN. x «it W o 0_ �•�1- o 6 _c a 0 o N C 2 U o N L C` 0 1.1-, Z W a aa) c W a c 0 W a) H 2 H m 0 0 F- m R. m U o 4) 0 0 2 N 2 O N 4- H L p 'C H Z N ch NI D 1_17' I- Z 0 0 UCDO.m 00 �cqco oo DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, REJECTING THE BIDS SUBMITTED FOR THE GREEN RIVER PEDESTRIAN AND UTILITY BRIDGE PROJECT #07 -RW02, AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO RE- DESIGN THE PROJECT AND RE- ADVERTISE FOR BIDS. WHEREAS, sealed bids were solicited for the Green River Pedestrian and Utility Bridge Project #07 -RW02; and WHEREAS, all the bids received from four bidders were publicly opened, examined and declared by the City Clerk's Office on June 15, 2007; and WHEREAS, the engineer's estimate for this repair and sealing project was $192,100.00, and the budgeted amount was $270,000.00, and the bids received ranged from $192,100 to $307,753; and WHEREAS, none of the bids were responsive to the requirement for ten years of similar experience for the type and size of this project; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.23.352 provides for the rejection of any or all bids by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, staff recommends the rejection of all bids, and further recommends re- designing the work and re- advertising for bids; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. All bids for the Green River Pedestrian and Utility Bridge Project are hereby rejected. The bid deposits received by the City shall be returned to the bidders with notification of the rejection. Section 2. City staff is hereby authorized to re- design the work and re- advertise for bids. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2007. ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED: Verna Griffin, Council President Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Office of the City Attorney Resolution Number: C:1Documents and Settings\All Users\ Desktop \Kelly\MMSDATA\Resoluuons \Green River Bridge Bid Reject.doc GL:ksn 7/2/2107 Page 1 of 1 f o t TA City of Tukwila 9 u Transportation Committee o 0:4;f\..:0" ,V 1909 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes June 25, 2007- 5:00 p.m. PRESENT Councilmembers: Pam Carter, Chair; Pam Linder and Joe Dune Staff: Jim Morrow, Gail Labanara, Robin Tischmak and Kimberly Matej Guests: Chuck Parrish CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Carter called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m. I. PRESENTATIONS No presentations. II. BUSINESS AGENDA A. Green River Pedestrian and Utility Bridge Repairs and Sealing Bid Reiection Staff is seeking approval to reject all bids received for the Green River Pedestrian and Utility Bridge Repairs and Sealing project. Staff is requesting the bid rejection because no bidder was found to meet the criteria for i experience as set forth in the bid packet. The project will be re -bid in two separate packages one for bridge repair and the second for bridge painting. This decision to re -bid the project into two packages is based on a short survey of vendors who are willing and experienced to complete only one task but not the other. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JULY 9 COW FOR DISCUSSION. B. SR -518 Route Development Plan Proposed Modifications Sea -Tac International Airport desires to develop a parcel of land north of SR -518. In order to do this, Washington State Department of Transportation WSDOT) needs to amend the Route Development Plan (RDP) for SR -518 and 24 Ave. S. /S. 154 /SR -99. The Airport and City of SeaTac would like to offer two additional alternative scenarios for this interchange in the RDP; however, in order for WSDOT to make modifications to their RDP, they require concurrence of all effected parties. At this time, effected parties include: the Cities of SeaTac, Burien and Tukwila; Port of Seattle and the WSDOT. After reviewing the two additional alternative scenarios, and determining that either option is more advantageous to the City of Tukwila in comparison to the current route, the Committee authorized Jim Morrow, Public Works Director, to sign his concurrence with modifying the WSDOT RDP to reflect these alternatives as options. The Committee authorized Jim's signature based on the following: the concurrence of the additions do not endorse a specific option or lock the City into any commitment; there are no decisions being made regarding the interchange or RDP; and both alternatives are advantageous to the City of Tukwila. Finally, staff will return to Committee and full Council once these modifications require action by the City of Tukwila. INFORMATION ONLY. III. ANNOUNCEMENTS No announcements. IV. MISCELLANEOUS Meeting adjourned at 5:36 p.m. Next meeting: Monday, July 9, 2007 5:00 p.m. Conference Room 1 Committee Chair Approval Minutes by KAM. Review by GL. COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS r ti Initialr ITEM Ara 0 ii Meeting Date 1 Prepared by 1 Mayor's review Council review us t 10 7/9/07 1 RT ft 3 7/16/07 1 RT 1 1 I rocs 1 I 1 I 1 I ITEM INFORMATION CAS NUMBER: 07-088 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: JULY 9, 2007 AGENDA ITEM TITLE Tukwila Int'1 Blvd Phases II III Condemnation Ordinance CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance El Bid Award Public Hearing Other Mtg Date 7/9/07 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 7/16/07 Mtg Date Mts Date Mtg Date: SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PW/ SPONSOR'S Final design of the Tukwila International Blvd Phases II III is near completion. Right -of- SUILMARY way and easements are needed along the project route in order to construct the proposed improvements. This condemnation ordinance is the most expedient way to ensure certification of right -of -way and stay on the project's schedule. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 4/23/07 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Approve ordinance. COrMIITTEE Unanimous approval; forward to COW. COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED N/A N/A Fund Source: Comments: MTG. DATE 1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 7/9/07 1 7/16/07 1 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 7/9/07 1 Information Memo dated July 3, 2007 Ordinance with Exhibits Transportation Committee Meeting Minutes from April 23, 2007 7/16/07 INFORMATION MEMO To: Mayor Mullet From: Public Works Director n Date: July 3, 2007 Subject: Tukwila International Boulevard Phases 2 3 Road Improvements S 139 St to S 116 St Right -of- Way /Condemnation Ordinance Project Nos. 95 -RWO3 95 -RWO4 ISSUE Prepare for actions that may be necessary for the City to secure right -of -way and easements for the Tukwila International Boulevard Phases 2 3 Road Improvements project in order to advertise for construction bids in 2007. BACKGROUND Final design for Tukwila International Boulevard Phases 2 3 is nearing completion. Right -of -way and easements are needed along the project in order to construct the proposed improvements. The project is scheduled for advertisement in late third quarter or the fourth quarter of 2007. The parcels affected are indicated in the following table with approximate right -of -way needs: ROW Required by Parcel Slope/UtiIity Temp. Constr. Sidewalk ROW Parcel No. Owner Easment (SF) Easement Wall Required (SF) Easement (SF) (SF) 1886400 -0910 ((Reeder, Blaine P. Rhiannon L. 105 205 0 1170100 -0000 (((Colony Square Condominium) 0 483 0 1734060 -1040 (Wiseman Craig 0 2138 0 734060 -1027 (Robbins Properties LLC 0 7741 0 0 734060 -1024 (Fleischman, Steven S. 221 303 214 0 1734060 -1021 (Spagnole, Barber Lillian 682 451 518 0 1734060 -0940 (SCI Management Corp (not Group) 0 1,922 0 0 1142260-0210 (Dream Catcher Homes LLC 0 3,693 0 0 1735960 -0855 'Mettler, Nathaniel M. 186 1666 0 0 735960 -0810 1Sibrian, Agnes K. 146 408 0 0 735960 -0815 !Boun,Phanny 54 685 0 0 735960 -0635 !Salle, Bernardo Lucy 0 0 0 190 735960 -0625 1Souvatdy, Khamphy Souliphone 715 1,090 0 1,001 1735960 -0310 1Loiselle, Leroy C. 0 1,729 0 0 1735960 -0195 (Loiselle, Leroy C. 352 0 0 0 1735960 -0875 1Aniold, Jerry D 0 525 0 0 1734560 -0916 (Koch Daniel 0 509 0 0 1734060 -0602 (International Gateway East LLC 10,985 0 0 0 092304 -9394 'Gipson, James E. 277 0 0 0 102304 -9080 (International Gateway East LLC 689 0 0 0 1092304 -9367 (International Gateway West LLC 169 0 0 0 c:h docume— Probinllocak— Nemp\xpgrpwisetinfomation memo condemnation 7 -3 -07 orig from city.doc 7 Mayor Mullet Page 2 July 3, 2007 The negotiations with the property owners are on going. Most of the property needs are for temporary construction easements. A few small right -of -way acquisitions are needed. It is critical for the project that negotiations are completed in a timely fashion. If negotiations fail, condemnation proceedings will be necessary to obtain the properties needed. Condemnation must be authorized by the Council and can be a lengthy process. ANALYSIS Due to the current schedule's time limitation for property acquisition, it is recommended to begin condemnation proceedings as soon as possible for all properties identified as being a "take" for construction of the project. Condemnation would then be under way for any properties unable to be acquired through the negotiation process. Then, as successful negotiations and acquisitions occur, those properties would be removed from the condemnation process. It is felt that this is the most expedient way to ensure certification of right -of -way given the current schedule. A draft condemnation ordinance has been prepared for the subject properties. The plans exhibit (Exhibit "B is attached and the legal description exhibits (Exhibit "A will be attached to the final version. RECOMMENDATION Take draft document to Committee of the Whole for review and discussion. Forward the condemnation ordinance to the City Council for adoption. attachments c- \docume -l' robin locals- 1\temp'apgrpwise\ information merro condemnation 7 -3 -07 orig from city.doc P A ET AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTING THE TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD, PHASES 2 3 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR CONDEMNATION, APPRO- PRIATION AND TAKING OF LAND AND PROPERTY RIGHTS NECESSARY THEREFOR; PROVIDING FOR THE COST THEREOF; DIRECTING THE INITIATION OF APPROPRIATE PROCEEDINGS IN THE MANNER PROVIDED BY LAW FOR THE CONDEMNATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EITLCTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on December 11, 2006, by Ordinance No. 2148, the City Council adopted the 2007 City budget and provided therein for a transportation program that included funding for Tukwila International Boulevard, Phases 2 3 road improvements; and WHEREAS, the Capital Improvement Program provides for the acquisition of land and property for improvement of Tukwila International Boulevard, Phases 2 3; and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila Capital Improvement Program provides for the City's roadway reconstruction and safety improvements, which coordinates road projects with other elements of the larger transportation system; abutting land uses; and business, industry, government, and residential processes; and WHEREAS, the City needs to acquire the property and property rights necessary to facilitate reconstruction of the widened road with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and other amenities within the time constraints set forth by outside funding sources; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that public health, safety, necessity, and convenience demand that Tukwila International Boulevard be improved within the City of Tukwila, in accordance with the Capital Improvement Program, and that certain properties, property rights, and rights in property be condemned, appropriated, taken and damaged for public use, subject to the making or paying of just compensation to the owners thereof in the manner provided by law; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized by RCW 35A.64.200 and Chapter 8.12 RCW to initiate eminent domain proceedings for the condemnation of the property; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council deems it necessary and in the best interest of the citizens of Tukwila that lands, described in the attached Exhibit "A" and shown in Exhibit "B," and other property rights and /or rights in property be condemned, appropriated, taken and damaged for the purpose of completing the Tukwila International Boulevard, Phases 2 3 road improvements. The extended reconstruction of the widened road will include curb, gutter, sidewalks, retaining walls, landscaping, illumination, drainage, channelization, and related improvements. The project will C: \Documents and Setting \All Users \Desktop Kelly \MSDATA Ordinances \Condemnation Tr&.doc RT:ksn 7/5 /2007 Page 1 of 2 require significant reconstruction of the roadway as well as relocation /reconstruction of utilities, subject to the making or paying of just compensation to the owners herein in the manner provided by Iaw. Section 2. Compensation shall be made for the land taken and damaged. The costs and expenses for acquiring all interests and rights in said property shall be paid for from the City's Arterial Street 104 Fund. Section 3. Condemnation proceedings are hereby authorized to acquire property and property rights and /or rights in property, together with the right to construct and maintain slopes for cuts and fills on certain abutting properties, described in the attached Exhibit "A" and shown in Exhibit "B," for the purpose of the Tukwila International Boulevard, Phases 2 3 road improvements. Section 4. The attorneys for the City of Tukwila are hereby authorized and directed to begin to prosecute the proceedings provided by law to condemn, take, and appropriate the land and other property and property rights necessary to carry out the provisions of this ordinance. Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2007. ATTEST AUTHENTICA LED: Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk Filed with the City Clerk: APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Office of the City Attorney Ordinance Number: Attachments: Exhibit A Index and Legal Descriptions Exhibit B Right -of -way Plan Sheets C: \Documents and Settings \All Users Desktop Kelly MSDATA Ordinances Condemnation TIB.doc RT:ksn 7/5/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 EXHIBIT "A" 2 3 INDEX ORDINANCE 4 5 Tukwila International Boulevard Phases 2 3 6 7 DOCUMENTS FOR RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION 8 9 10 PARCEL DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION EXHIBIT NO 11 12 886400 -0910 Reeder Slope/Utility Easement A -1.1 A -1.2 13 Reeder Temp. Const. Easement A -2.1 A -2.2 14 15 170100 -0000 Colony Square Condominium Temp. Const. Easement A -3.1 A -3.2 16 17 734060 -1040 Wiseman Temp. Const. Easement A -4.1 A -4.2 18 19 734060 -1027 Robbins Properties LLC Temp. Const. Easement A -5.1 A -5.2 20 21 734060 -1024 Fleischman Slope/Utility Easement A -6.1 A -6.2 22 Fleischman Temp. Const. Easement A -7.1 A -7.2 23 Fleischman Sidewalk/Wall Easement A -8.1 A -8.2 24 25 734060 -1021 Spagnole Slope/Utility Easement A -9.1 A -9.2 26 Spagnole Temp. Const. Easement A -10.1 A -I0.2 27 Spagnole Sidewalk/Wall Easement A -11.1 A -11.2 28 29 734060 -0940 SCI Management Corp. Temp. Const. Easement A -12.1 A -12.2 30 31 142260 -0210 Dream Catcher Homes LLC Temp. Const. Easement A -13.1 A -13.2 32 33 735960 -0855 Mettler Slope/Utility Easement A -14.1 A -14.2 34 Mettler Temp. Const. Easement A -15.1 A -15.2 35 36 735960 -0810 Sibrian Slope/Utility Easement A -16.1 A -16.2 37 Sibrian Temp. Const. Easement A -17.1 A -17.2 38 39 735960 -0815 Boun Slope/Utility Easement A -18.1 A -18.2 40 Boun Temp. Const. Easement A -19.1 A -19.2 41 42 735960 -0635 Salle Right -of -Way A -20.1 A -20.2 43 44 735960 -0625 Souvatdy Slope/Utility Easement A -21.1 A -21.2 45 Souvatdy Temp. Const. Easement A -22.1 A -22.2 46 Souvatdy Right -of -Way A -23.1 A -23.2 47 48 735960 -0310 Loiselle Temp. Const. Easement A -24.1 A -24.2 49 50 735960 -0195 Loiselle Slope/Utility Easement A -25.1 A -25.2 51 52 735960 -0875 Arnold Temp. Const. Easement A -26.1 A -26.2 53 Job No. A00084 4 O: /Ordinance.doc 1 1 734560 -0916 Koch Temp. Const. Easement A -27.1 A -27.2 2 3 734060 -0602 Int'l Gateway East LLC Slope/Utility Easement A -28.1 A -28.2 4 5 092304 -9394 Gipson Slope/Utility Easement A -29.1 A -29.2 6 7 102304 -9080 Int'l Gateway East LLC Slope/Utility Easement A -30.1 A -30.2 8 9 092304 -9367 Int'l Gateway West LLC Slope/Utility Easement A -31.1 A -31.2 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Job No. A00084 5 O: /Ordinance.doc SW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. 38TH AVE. S. 1111111111111100611........ N.T.S. -3 A o -0 \31 Z� rn TAX LOT NUMBER 886400 -0905 m LOT 7, BLOCK 8 VAL —VUE ADDITION VOL. 40, PG. 4 TAX LOT NUMBER TAX LOT NUMBER 886400 -0910 886400 -0915 SLOPE UTILITY EASEMENT 105 S. F.± s 10' O O P.O.B.- 10' EX!S77NG ROW 14.76' T. P.O. B. o 0 cc 0 TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH) EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE 8' N 1428'59" W April 4, 2007 ACAD No. 886400 -0910 s u esmt K EXHIBIT A I -I Licadscape Architecture PARCEL 886400 -0910 Urban Design SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT A t l PARCEL NO, 886400 -0910 SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL 'A DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL A" BEING ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE NORTH 14° 28' 59" WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 14.76 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 75° 31' 01" WEST, 10.50 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 10.50 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY MARGIN; THENCE NORTH 14° 28' 5.9" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 75° 31' 01" EAST, 10.50 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 14° 28' 59" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 10.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 105 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL A" LOT 7, BLOCK 8, VAL -VUE ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 40 OF PLATS, PAGE 4, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 3t -'err: �r 'l4S _.'i. w ,3 fl. V I i -,11..P 33 54 a E'n°;t� S 10 -C1- O 1 4-'1 8 °-7 886400 -0910 S U esmt.doc 1 KP G T; \C :OMA• SFATT.F SW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N. R. 4 E. W.M. 38TH AVE. S. ti N.T.S. o a cn 7 4 \ri TAX LOT NUMBER y� 886400 -0905 LOT 7, BLOCK 8 VAL —VUE ADDITION VOL 40, PG. 4 TAX LOT NUMBER TAX LOT NUMBER 886400 -0910 886400 -0915 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 205 S.F.f 0' 3_, P.O.B. 5' 5' EXISTING ROW 9.76' T.P.O.B. SLOPE U77LITY EASEMENT 0 cc 0 co TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH) EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE N 1428'59" W April 4, 2007 ACAD No. 886400 -0910 TCE ICING EXHIBIT A-Z -1 Landscape ,r, PARCEL 886400 -0990 Cell Enghletalag TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT EXHIBIT A 2 -2_ PARCEL NO. 886400 -0910 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL "A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A”, BEING ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE NORTH 14° 28' 59" WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 9.76 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 75° 31' 01" WEST, 15.50 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 15.50 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY MARGIN THENCE NORTH 14° 28' 59" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 20.00 FEET,' THENCE NORTH 75° 31' 01" EAST, 15.50 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 14° 28' 59" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 5.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75° 31' 01" WEST, 10.50 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 10.50 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY MARGIN THENCE SOUTH 14° 28' 59" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 10.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 75° 31' 01" EAST, 10.50 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 14° 28' 59" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 5.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 205 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "A" LOT 7, BLOCK 8, VAL -VUE ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 40 OF PLATS, PAGE 4, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ,1G 1\4, Y t d v„ 4 331 it —f':''' A" a `i-, a „Y«gs 10-67- 0 i 886400 -0910 TCE dog 1- KP G TACO,'vt• SEATTLE SW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. N.T.S. THE COLONY SQUARE CONDOMINIUM VOL. 26, PG. 3 -5 TAX LOT NUMBER 170100 -0000 1 v ck. Q O /51.8 10' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 483 S.F.± o o b o j3 V 91.68' 44.84' P.O.B. T.P.O.B. EXISTING ROW 0 0 ce 0 0 Ln e EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE N 1428'59” W TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH) Rev. June 13, 2007 ACAD No. 170100 -0000 tce K EXHIBIT h,- -1 PARCEL 170100-0000 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION Urban Design EASEMENT EXHIBIT 4 �j Z PARCEL NO. 170 00 -0000 THE COLONY SQUARE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL "A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A", BEING ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 14° 28' 59" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 91.68 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 14° 28' 59" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 44.84 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID WESTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 40° 30' 56" WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 12.21 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID WESTERLY MARGIN THENCE NORTH 14° 28' 59" WEST ALONG A LINE THAT IS 10.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 51.84 FEET, THENCE NORTH 75° 31' 01" EAST, 10.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 483 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "A" COMMON AREAS OF THE COLONY SQUARE, A CONDOMINIUM, ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 7811160863, AND AMENDMENTS THERETO, IF ANY, AND IN VOLUME 26 OF CONDOMINIUMS, PAGES 3 THROUGH 5, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ye(AEM. l ea_ ;t I 33154 a IREs 1 10 ot 7 170100 -0000 TCE.doc 1 Kr) C4 TACOMA- SEATTLE NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. ii! m x TAX LOT NUMBER 734060 -1027 0 e' C 73 1 n —T1 N.T.S. n irri._.25.90' PROPERTY LINE crl G7 73 2 Z 0 Z tn O D C r Z co p uo o CA CO_ IV TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 2138 S.F.± z rn 0 0 PORTION OF TRACT 66 RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS VOL. 10, PG. 74 m 50 RO TAX LOT NUMBER o 19,0 734060 -1040 4 6 EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE 70' ROW Rev. June 19, 2007 ACAD No. 734060 -1040 TCE rev NEM EXHIBIT A y I Landscape Architecture PARCEL 734060 -1040 czwil Engineering 'Urban Design TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT EXHIBIT A-4- PARCEL NO. 734060 -1040 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL "A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 'A", BEING ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE NORTH 88° 55' 00" EAST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED TRACT 66, A DISTANCE OF 25.90 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 25.00 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 16° 11' 00" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 80.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73° 49' 00" WEST, 19.00 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 6.00 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 16° 11' 00" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 6.00 FEET TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 73° 49' 00" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 6.00 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTH 16° 11' 00" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 93.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 2,138 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "A" THAT PORTION OF TRACT 66, RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 248.81 FEET WEST FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 89° 43' 00" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 60.13 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1; THENCE FOLLOWING THE MARGIN OF SAID HIGHWAY NORTH 16° 11' 00" WEST 14.73 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73° 49' 00" WEST 40 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16° 11' 00" WEST 250 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73° 49' 00" WEST 20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16° 11' 00" WEST 137 FEET; THENCE EAST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 66 TO A POINT FROM WHICH THE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS SOUTH 01° 05' 00" EAST; THENCE SOUTH 01° 05' 00" EAST, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THE NORTH 42 FEET THEREOF 74. y jig ..4, 4 ->'-z- j O ~j154 ib± 0 xi.," 1-ii.s 1 ra.--:..../ 33 734060 -1040 TCE rev.doc 1 4 S 10 -01- D t 7 KPG- TACOMA- SEATTLE Z� NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. 70 5.24' TAX LOT NUMBER RO W 142260 -0210 P.O.B. PROPERTY LINE N c co (-0 O 0 t 6 O O N O O p 0 5' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 449 S.F.± 5' rrx X g0' N _5 RO 0 1 71 0 N. T.S. C 20' 0 1 1 T1 V,-, PARCEL B 0 Z TUKWILA BLA NO. 90 -3 -BLA REC. NO. 9005030538 -C3-73 TAX LOT NUMBER 734060 -1027 --C O Z cA O dJ cn N 1 v s TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION z N EASEMEN 7,292 S.F.f oz r O O 5.00' Ro W OA/1.3. PROPERTY LINE P.O.B. 25.90 TAX LOT NUMBER 734060 -1040 June 4, 2007 ACAD No. 734060 -1027 TCE IC.Pa. EXHIBIT A- -1 landscape Ireldtectare PARCEL 734060 -1027 aril Engineering Urban Design TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT EXHIBIT A- 5-.1 PARCEL NO. 734060 -1027 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL 'A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A", BEING ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 89° 18' 39" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL A 5.24 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 5.00 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 73° 18' 39" WEST, 2940.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 89.00 FEET TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 75° 02' 44" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 5.00 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT, THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 75° 02' 44" WEST, 2935.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 90.42 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 449 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF SAID PARCEL "A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL A" BEING ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE NORTH 14° 28' 59" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 356.62 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT THENCE NORTH 75° 31' 01" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 20.00 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 20.00 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 14° 28' 59" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 341.16 FEET; THENCE NORTH 75° 31' 01" EAST, 5.00 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 25.00 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 14° 28' 59" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 22.14 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL A THENCE NORTH 89° 18' 39" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 25.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 7,292 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. TOTAL EASEMENT AREA CONTAINING 7,741 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "A" PARCEL B, CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 90- 3 -BLA, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9005030538, BEING A PORTION OF TRACTS 65 AND 66, RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN PACIFIC HIGHWAY \t M. SOUTH, NOW KNOWN AS TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD. 's °'IM° F X 33154 734060 -1027 TCE.doc 1 `4.L LA1- 0 KPG ExP:;t S 10-01 °7 TACOMA- SEA \TTLF 6/-07 NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., WM. 3�T q VE oos4 osy F N.T.S. POR770N OF TRACT 65 RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS VOL. 10, PG 74 r� TAX LOT NUMBER 734060 -1024 0 TAX LOT NUMBER SLOPE UTILITY 734060 -1021 EASEMENT 221 S.F. f R= 2805.00' 14.55' L= 30.33' 5.00' 1 J 5.20' 5.00' 14.55' 5.20' P.O.B. EXISTING ROW R= 2810.00' SIDEWALK WALL L =28.97 EASEMENT TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH) EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE N 1428'59" W R= 2865.00_ Rev. June 28, 2007 ACAD No. 734060 -1024 s u esmt rev $P EXHIBIT Pt L i PARCEL 734060 -1024 Urban Desdan SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT A (D- PARCEL NO. 734060 -1024 SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL 'A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL A" BEING ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE NORTH 89° 18' 39" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A", 5.20 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 5.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY MARGIN AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 74° 55' 35" WEST, 2810.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 28.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14° 28' 59" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 14.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75° 31' 01" WEST, 5.00 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 10.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY MARGIN; THENCE NORTH 14° 28' 59" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 14.55 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 75° 31' 01" WEST, 2805.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 30.33 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 'A"; THENCE SOUTH 89° 18' 39" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 5.20 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 221 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "A" THE NORTH 193 FEET OF THE SOUTH 320.5 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF TRACT 65, RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY OF PRIMARY STATE NO. 1; EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET CONDEMNED FOR ROAD PURPOSES IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 169127; AND EXCEPT THE WEST 48.00 FEET OF M yF THE SOUTH 43.00 FEET THEREOF. 04 As1ll ii t ea 734060 -1024 S U esmt rev.doc ‘EXPIRES 10 0'! Revised 6 -28 -07 1 k..... 3,x41 KPc Z '1,© TACOMA. SFATTLF NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. 3,T 4 frF. S °s4 °6° F h N.T.S. PORTION OF TRACT 65 RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS 2 VOL. 10, PG 74 TAX LOT NUMBER k 734060 -1024 t O Q� TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TAX LOT NUMBER EASEMENT 303 S.F.t 734060 -1021 R= 2800.00' R= 2805.00' L= 31.69' L= 30.33' 19.55' 1 0 14.55' o SLOPE UTILITY EASEMENT O 5' 14.55' R= 2815.00' P.O.B. EXISTING ROW L= 27.61' T.P.O.B. SIDEWALK WALL EASEMENT 3 e. ce TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. Lo (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH) EXISTING ROW C ENTERLINE N 1428'59" W R=2865.00' Rev. June 28, 2007 ACAD No. 734060 -1024 TCE rev K P C 4 EXHIBIT A F l Landscape Architecture PARCEL 734060 -1024 Civil Engineering Urban Design TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT EXHIBIT 11-1- Z PARCEL IVO. 7340604024 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL A DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A", BEING ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 74° 57' 18" WEST, 2815.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 27.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14° 28' 59" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 14.55 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 14° 28' 59" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 5.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75° 31' 01" WEST, 15.00 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 15.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY MARGIN; THENCE NORTH 14° 28' 59" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 19.55 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 75° 31' 01" WEST, 2800.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 31.69 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL A THENCE SOUTH 89° 18' 39" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, 5.20 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 10.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 74° 53' 51" WEST, 2805.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 30.33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14° 28' 59" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 14.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 75° 31' 01" EAST, 10.00 FEET TO THE PO /NT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 303 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "A" THE NORTH 193 FEET OF THE SOUTH 320.5 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF TRACT 65, RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY OF PRIMARY STATE NO. 1; EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET CONDEMNED FOR ROAD PURPOSES IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 169127; AND EXCEPT THE WEST 48.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 43.00 FEET THEREOF. M. k, e 1 t a s. w 734060 -1024 TCE.doc 1 E"PiFIES 10 1 KPG 4- la -°1 TACOMA SFATTI.F NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. 3,T'' 4 VE S \OOS 4O6 "E t. N.T.S. POR770N OF TRACT 65 Z RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS VOL. 10, PG 74 7 TAX LOT NUMBER ti 734060 -1024 OQ Q. TAX LOT NUMBER 734060 -1021 SIDEWALK WALL EASEMENT 214 S.F.f R= 2810.00' I 0 14.55' L= 28.97' u0 )i 7 5.20' 14.55' R= 2815.00' P.O.B. EXISTING ROW L= 27.61' 0 ct TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. Lo (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH) tr EXIS77NG ROW CENTERLINE N 1428'59" W R= 2865.00' June 28, 2007 ACAD No. 734060 -1024 sw wall esmt NEM EXHIBIT IA v- t landacape Architecture PARCEL 734060 -1024 Urban Desi,gn SIDEWALK AND WALL EASEMENT EXHIBIT A PARCEL NO, 7340604024 SIDEWALK AND WALL EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL "A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 'A", BEING ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 74° 57' 18" WEST, 2815.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 27.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14° 28' 59" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 14.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75° 31' 01" WEST, 5.00 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 5.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY MARGIN; THENCE NORTH 14° 28' 59" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 14.55 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 75° 31' 01" WEST, 2810.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 28.97 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A"; THENCE SOUTH 89° 18' 39" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 5.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 214 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "A" THE NORTH 193 FEET OF THE SOUTH 320.5 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF TRACT 65, RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WESTERLY OF PRIMARY STATE NO. 1; EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET CONDEMNED FOR ROAD PURPOSES IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 169127; AND EXCEPT THE WEST 48.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 43.00 FEET THEREOF. 0 y. a0,3_3154 f4, EXPMES 10 -01- 734060 -1024 sw wall esmt doc 6 -d 7 1 KP TACOMA- SFATTLF NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. N.T.S. ..3,77-7_, A VE �0 5 6 E S, M TAX LOT NUMBER 734060 -1024 .1 PORTION OF TRACT 65 RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS VOL 10, PG 74 Q TAX LOT NUMBER c 734060 -1021 Q SLOPE UTILITY a EASEMENT 682 S.F.f Q o 0 Co R= 2805.00' L= 120.02' �c ^i 5.20' o Q n 5.20' SIDEWALK WALL EASEMENT R= 2815.00' 1 R= 2815.00' EXISTING ROW L= 104.46' L= 15.52' R= 2810.00' 10.00' L= 102.87' 0 a TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH) EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE R= 2865.00' Rev. June 28, 2007 ACAD No. 734060 -1021 s u esmt IC EXHIBIT I-ct- 1 PARCEL 734060 -1021 aril Magiustaing Urban D.mieln SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT A-q-z PARCEL NO. 734060 -1021 SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THE EASTERLY 10.00 FEET OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL A° EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID PARCEL "A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A", BEING ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE NORTH 89° 18' 39" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A", 5.20 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 5.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY MARGIN; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 74° 55' 35" WEST, 2810.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 102.87 FEET; THENCE NORTH 72° 49' 44" EAST, 5.00 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 72° 49' 44" WEST, 2815.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 104.46 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 682 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL A" THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 114.8 FEET OF TRACT 65, RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WEST OF PRIMARY STATE NO. 1; EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR ROAD PURPOSES IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 169127. 0, t: s V 1 AA/.1S:74.1(/,/1/_^ 7 ea t% f 4 0 s ,p_'-_.•-.3' 5' CS 10 -01 -07 734060 -1021 S U esmt rev.doc Revised 6 -28 -07 1 KPG TACOMA SFATTLF NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. N.T.S. 3,r "4VE s N O TAX LOT NUMBER 734060 -1024 1 PORTION OF TRACT 65 RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS VOL. 10, PG. 74 TAX LOT NUMBER 734060 -1021 TOTAL EASEMENT AREA 451 S.F.± k. p TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION 'TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION v 1. 7 EA 213 S.F.± EASEMENT 238 S.F.± m o a R= 2800.00' 5.27' Q p 5.20' R= 2800.00' 5.02' 5.00' L=48.32' O L 41.555' R= 2805.00 L= 29.71' M o o R= 2805.00' L= 43.54' POINT "A" R= 2805.00' L= 46.77' P.O.B. h Q 15 o SIDEWALK AND WALL EASEMENT o EXISTING ROW SLOPE UTILITY EASEMENT C. TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH) f u) EXTI ROW CEN TERLINE R= 2865.00' Rev. June 28, 2007 ACAD No. 734060 -1021 TCE rev MPG EXHIBIT A- 10-1 PARCEL 734060 -1021 aril Eaghtneriag Urban Dasiga TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT EXHIBIT A -10 PARCEL NO. 734060 -1021 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL A" DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL A" WITH A LINE THAT IS 10.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE SOUTHERLYALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 72° 26' 45" WEST, 2805.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 46.77 FEET TO POINT "A"; THENCE SOUTH 73° 28' 58" WEST, 5.00 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 15.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARAI I FL WITH SAID WESTERLY MARGIN; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 73° 24' 03" WEST, 2800.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 48.32 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A"; THENCE SOUTH 89° 18' 39" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, 5.27 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTA /NING 238 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL "A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT SAID POINT A THENCE SOUTHERLYALONG A LINE THAT IS 10.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH), ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 73° 24' 03" WEST, 2805.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 29.71 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHERLYALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 74° 00' 29" WEST, 2805.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 43.54 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A"; THENCE NORTH 89° 18' 39" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 5.20 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 15.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY MARGIN; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 74° 52' 07" WEST, 2800.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 41.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 68° 19' 02" EAST, 5.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 213 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. TOTAL EASEMENT AREA CONTAINING 451 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. q PARCEL 'A" z c I; THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 114.8 FEET OF TRACT 65, v 3 RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE y P THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, 1 PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WEST it. OF PRIMARY STATE NO. 1; ,�,53 EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR ROAD ,1 PURPOSES IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 169127. M` 3 4 VASES 10 -01- 07 a 734060 -1 02 1 TCE rev.doc 1 z- P G z2 -v 7 K T.AC T'i t'\ SFATTI.F NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. N. T. S. 3�r 4 frF S N O OS \6ry o TAX LOT NUMBER 734060 -1024 Ic"/ PORTION OF TRACT 65 RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS VOL. 10, PG 74 <1., TAX LOT NUMBER 2 734060 -1021 ma SIDE WALL t 2O EASEMENT 518 S.F.t 4 W o (0 O vO R= 2810.00' L= 102.87' Q. h Q n� 5.20' 777 7\7 5.00' P.O.B. R= 2815.00' EXISTING ROW L= 104.46' 5.00' 0 c h TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH) EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE R= 2865.00' June 28, 2007 ACAD No. 734060 -1021 sw wall esmt KID EXHIBIT P} -1\- 1 Landscape Archnecbxre PARCEL 734060 -1021 Civil Enenealing Urban Design SIDEWALK AND WALL EASEMENT EXHIBIT A 11. Z PARCEL NO, 734060 -1021 SIDEWALK AND WALL EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL "A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A", BEING ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE NORTH 89° 18' 39" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 'A", 5.20 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 5.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY MARGIN; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 74° 55' 35" WEST, 2810.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 102.87 FEET; THENCE NORTH 72° 49' 44" EAST, 5.00 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 72° 49' 44" WEST, 2815.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 104.46 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 518 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL A" THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 114.8 FEET OF TRACT 65, RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING WEST OF PRIMARY STATE NO. 1; EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR ROAD PURPOSES IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 169127. 7 c\ 1 .4 E I 4 ,K 1 r gWASF. 14-N; /1 X 33 1 E XPIRES 1 o -o1 -p' Ca -2q ©1 734060 -1021 sw wa /I esmt.doc 1 KPG TACOMA- SFAT(LF NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. N. T.S. to 3y 4 VE S OO 4 0 6' 3 to TAX LOT NUMBER 734060 -1021 RIVER IDE O INTERURBAN T TRACTS VOL. 10, PG 74 PROPERTY TAX LOT NUMBER LINE 734060 -0940 N R =2815.0 L =109.35' EXISTING ROW TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 1,922 S.F.± cc TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BLVD. (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH) EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE R= 2865.00' April 6, 2007 ACAD No. 734060 -0940 TCE MPG. EXHIBIT f landscape PARCEL 734060 -0940 Urban Dc.lia TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT EXHIBIT A IZ' PARCEL NO. 734060 -0940 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF TRACT 61, RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF STATE ROAD NUMBER 1; EXCEPT THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF CONDEMNED FOR ROAD KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NUMBER 169127, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. CONTAINING 1,922 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. I .4 i e nPAU 10 -01- 0 i 4 -16 -01 734060 -0940 TCE.doc 1 KPG TACOMA SFATTI.F NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. TAX LOT NUMBER 734060 -0926 PROPERTY LINE 30' ROW o� ro N al! P.O.B. O �E \8 (A. G k Q0 1 5 4O 73 1-3 A up t NJ 9' 'o o_ N.T.S. o o_ f� N o I J 93 '�1 CP_ N''''.. o 12' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION rt EASEMENT 3,500 S F.f EXISTING ROW p° CENTERLINE z 50 ROW TRACT A CASCADE GLEN C VOL. 214, PG. 15 -18 TAX LOT NUMBER y 142260 -0210 12'p0� TOTAL EASEMENT AREA n 1O ROW 3,693 S.F. f 1-6 I rn -k Q =Z I EXISTING J 5.00' --G 0 ROW \f7 -5, TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 193 S.F. f O C R= 2935.00' -k CO L= 37. R= 2940.00' �f L= 39.40' 1 0 P.O.B. 5.24' Rev. June 19, 2007 ACAD No. 142260 -0210 TCE rev KID EXHIBIT A- I 'S- m:Lampe Irchiteetare PARCEL 142260-0210 Urban Design TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT EXHIBIT A- Z PARCEL NO. 1422 60- 0210 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL 'A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH) AND THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 37 AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 00° 54' 06" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN OF 37 AVENUE SOUTH, 27.80 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 12.00 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ONA CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 65° 04' 49" WEST, 2927.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 304.75 FEET TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 71° 02' 45" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 12.00 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 71° 02' 45" WEST, 2915.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 278.48 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 3,500 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF SAID PARCEL "A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 'A", BEING ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 73° 16' 49" WEST, 2935.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 37.77 FEET, THENCE NORTH 72° 32' 35" EAST, 5.00 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 5.00 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 72° 32' 35" WEST, 2940.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.40 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL A THENCE NORTH 89° 18' 39" WEST ALONG SAND SOUTH LINE, 5.24 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 193 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. TOTAL EASEMENT AREA CONTAINING 3,693 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL 'A" \E M. y TRACT A, CASCADE GLEN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT s Q "S THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 214 OF PLATS, PAGES J J il 15 THROUGH 18, INCLUSIVE, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. y' t. I 4,f may! Y txpiRE$ 10-01 0 142260 -0210 TCErev.doc 1 KPG 20 21 TACOMA SEATTLE NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E, W.M. a I 5 6 al! o s� LA 2� s. N.T.S. I LOT 5 POR. 3 4, BLOCK 9 ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION TO RIVERTON, VOL. 16, PG. 57 (A TAX LOT NUMBER G 735960 -0855 j �.z Q T� o -Z Lu Gy o I OZ o c-, y SLOPE AND J 4 5 UTILITY EASEMENT 15* 186 S.F.t 30' ROW o. R= 2915.00' R= 2930.50' L= 12.06' 5 L= 11.99' T.P. O. B. •5. R= 2915.00' I EXISTING ROW\ L =28.16' PROPERTY LINE CENTERLINE P.O.B. 50 R6 TAX LOT NUMBER 735960 -0870 EXISTING ROW Mo 15, 2007 ACAD No. 735960 -0855 S U Esmt Ir...Elle EXHIBIT ►`k landacape Irchttectore PARCEL 735960 -0855 Civil ZagEnearing Urban Napa SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT -14 PARCEL NO. 735960 -0855 SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL 'A'; DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A", BEING ON THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 60° 28' 16" WEST, 2915.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 28.16 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 59° 55' 03" WEST, 2915.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 12.06 FEET; THENCE NORTH 60° 04' 02" EAST, 15.50 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 15.50 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 59° 40' 57" WEST, 2930.50 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 11.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 59° 47' 56" WEST, 15.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 186 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL 'A" LOT 5 AND THAT PORTION OF LOTS 3 AND 4, LYING EASTERLY OF STATE ROAD NO. 1, ALL IN BLOCK 9, ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION TO RIVERTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 57, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED ALLEY ADJOINGING SAID LOTS 3 AND 4 LYING EASTERLY OF STATE ROAD NO. 1. 0 v 4� g a s L x 4 :A 3 i /�t 331`A v Xlnds 10-01- Di y 5� z2 -0 7 735960 -0855 S U esmt.doc 1 KPG TA( 0114A- SFATTLF NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. C I rLd 5 67: s cs 2 ui N. T.S. I k 15 O LOT 5 POR. 3 4, BLOCK 9 ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION TO RIVERTON, VOL. 16, PG. 57 (./j TAX LOT NUMBER G l 735960-0855 Li N 2 13' TEMPORARY CONSTRUC S 7. EASEMENT 1,248 S.Ft LJ 0 y a(5' o f --i— 0 c.S) 0 SLOPE AND z G I UTILITY EASEMENT \\9 03‘.90. -7-4:6 J Q O p R= 2930.50' 3 L= 11.99' 15 g 30' ROW b() 13' TEMPORARY 1 f CONSTRUCTION R= 2915.0 p0 EASEMENT L= 12.06' 1 3 -p r 418 S.F.th EXISTING ROW\ PROPERTY LINE CENTERLINE 15.16' 50 R6 TAX LOT NUMBER 735960 -0870 EXISTING ROW May 15, 2007 ACAD No. 735960 -0855 TCE KM EXHIBIT 1‘y1S Landscape Architecture PARCEL 735960 -0855 Mil Ingicteartog Urban Design TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT EXHIBIT 1\ "IC PARCEL NO. 735960 -0855 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THE SOUTHWESTERLY 13.00 FEET OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL A EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF SAID PARCEL "A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A", BEING ON THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 60° 28' 16" WEST, 2915.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 28.16 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 59° 55' 03" WEST, 2915.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 12.06 FEET; THENCE NORTH 60° 04' 02" EAST, 15.50 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 15.50 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 59° 40' 57" WEST, 2930.50 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 11.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 59° 47' 56" WEST, 15.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 1,666 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL A LOT 5 AND THAT PORTION OF LOTS 3 AND 4, LYING EASTERLY OF STATE ROAD NO. 1, ALL IN BLOCK 9, ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION TO RIVERTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 57, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF VACATED ALLEY ADJOINGING SAID LOTS 3 AND 4 LYING EASTERLY OF STATE ROAD NO. 1. 1V17:2N 33154 Exe•IRES 10 01 Pi 735960 -0855 TCE. doc 5-- Zz -1 KPG TACOMA- SFATTI.F NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. TAX LOT NUMBER 'W 735960 -0815 c a LOT 14, BLOCK 8 o R OBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION cx TO RIVERTON, VOL. 16, PG. 57 1 a TAX LOT NUMBER 735960 -0810 N.T.S. 0� 50 0 ad a 5' SLOPE UTILITY G-_, -I:\ EASEMENT 146 S.F.f -o .y a EXIS7ING ROW v o 5 03 O S -C �32 S• .__i 0 0 ,...„----(:----H1 0 X 0 EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE May 15, 2007 735960 -0810 s u esmt IC-PM EXHIBIT A- Iko" 1 Architecture PARCEL 735960 -0810 Lsiutecepe Architecture Urban Deeig. SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT p PARCEL NO. 735960 -0810 SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THE SOUTHWESTERLY 5.00 FEET OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL A. CONTAINING 146 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL 'A" LOT 14, BLOCK 8, ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION TO RIVERTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 57, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 14, THEREOF CONVEYED TO STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER 1, BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2028175, 2014235 AND 2028176. �Nti ji7 ti �r3fv1e y °V1 L ExP:aes 1 o -c7 0 5, Z2 e7 735960 -0810 S U esmf.doc 1 \CCO: \l\ F: \TTLF NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. gi TAX LOT NUMBER 735960 -0815 w Z -J LOT 14, BLOCK 8 ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION w TO RIVERTON, VOL. 16, PG. 57 1 o TAX LOT NUMBER ct 735960 -0810 0 1s. N.T.S. D p L l l 43 °o. to �r 10' TEMPORARY CONSTRUC770N S EASEMENT 408 S.F.t S. 2 'G G <<a S Cli 5 7 I \u' C� -A EXISTING ROW Z 1 O -_-.1 O 6 *o o_ 6 Zp p EXISTING ROW CENTER LINE May 15, 2007 ACAD 735960 -0810 tce EXHIBIT 1) Archttectare /andscape Archttectare PARCEL 735960-0810 aril Englasaring TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT EXHIBIT A -11 "Z PARCEL NO. 735960 -0810 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THE NORTHEASTERLY 10.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY 15.00 FEET OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL A" CONTAINING 408 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL 'A" LOT 14, BLOCK 8, ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION TO RIVERTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 57, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOT 14, THEREOF CONVEYED TO STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER 1, BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2028175, 2014235 AND 2028176. �.0+ d Ems _4 !1 '-'2 q-*-- '1- t: t _.:,,.:_,:537 WI i 0 1 j .q:4-S, 0 1 PA €XP R 10-01 0 .--,--------',-----'<,-.4-----,---7-'-x------(,'7' s ue 5 -Z2 ©7 735960 -0810 TCE.doc 1 KPG TACOMA SFATTLF NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. z 41!11 LOTS 15 16, BLOCK 8 ROBBINS LOT SPRING BROOK ADDITION 11 TO RIVERTON, VOL. 16, PG. 57 L TAX LOT NUMBER o 735960 -0815 a ec I TAX LOT NUMBER 735960 -0810 N. TS. R= 2920.00' Q 7 L =7.13' e SLOPE UTILITY EASEMENT 54 S.F.± R= 2915.00' i 6d Rpll L= 14.29' co' N. P.O.B. G C -57 �n2� 0 2 EXISTING ROW G CENTERLINE EXISTING ROW cs o_ May 15, 2007 ACAD No. 735960 -0815 s u esmt W P M EXHIBIT 1 I droattschere PARCEL 735960 -0815 Urban Dtwiga SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT A 1' PARCEL NO. 735960 -0815 SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL A', DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A", BEING ON THE NORTHEASTERLY MARG /N OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 56° 06' 19" WEST, 2915.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 14.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55° 49' 28" EAST, 5.00 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 5.00 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 55° 49' 28" WEST, 2920.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 7.13 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 15 OF SAID PARCEL A THENCE SOUTH 00° 54' 06" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 8.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 54 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL A" LOTS 15 AND 16, BLOCK 8, ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION TO RIVERTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 57, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOTS 15 AND 16 THEREOF CONVEYED TO STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER 1, BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 2014235 AND 2028176. 0\2.-Z? 4� v\ 4 j. i,,_ ;1 ti r., J 3 k 1 A 7 f i i- �1 c.r.t... i C 38 1 5 4 E k EXPIRE3 10 01, 07 735960 -0815 S U esmt.doc 1 MPG F C \i SFATTLF NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. TAX LOT NUMBER 735960 -0825 PROPERTY LINE LOTS 15 16, BLOCK 8 30' ROW ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADD1770N u TO RIVERTON, VOL. 16, PG. 57 w_ TAX LOT NUMBER W 7.35960-0815 v -4 m 4' US PROPERTY LINE N.T.S. N EX1S71NG ROW i TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION o EASEMENT 685 S.F.± rn L TAX LOT NUMBER 7.35960-0810 R =2915.0 [kJ 2 L= 144.82 R= 2919.00' L= 151.71 w a_ a. EXIS ROW cc CENTERLINE G P- R= 2920.00' G y y L =7.13' i‘ A06 -A -IT -7 "P T.P. 5 ,r7,-- 8.75' 2 SLOPE cP0�< R= 2915.00' U17LITY G G L= 14.29' P.O.B. EASEMENT Q May 15, 2007 ACAD No. 7.35960-0815 TCE ir..F1G. EXHIBIT A ,Td.``"`` PARCEL 735960 -0815 Civil Extgittlxviag Urban Design TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT EXHIBIT A- (ci PARCEL NO. 735960 -0815 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL "A', DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A", BEING ON THE NORTHEASTERL Y MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 56° 06' 19" WEST, 2915.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 14.29 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 55° 49' 28" WEST, 2915.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 144.82 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF 37 AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 20° 56' 58" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN, 14.33 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 4.00 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ONA CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 52° 42' 28" WEST, 2919.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 151.71 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55° 41 08" EAST, 11.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 15 OF SAID PARCEL A THENCE SOUTH 00° 54' 06" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 17.40 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 5.00 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS SOUTH 55° 57' 52" WEST, 2920.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 7.13; THENCE SOUTH 55° 49' 28" WEST, 5.00 FEET TO THE TRUE PO /NT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 685 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL A" LOTS 15 AND 16, BLOCK 8, ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION TO RIVERTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 57, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LOTS 15 AND 16 THEREOF CONVEYED TO STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER 1, BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBERS 2014235 AND 2028176. Vim 1, Q��a� y;‘ iti, ►�f s Expip.ES 10 01 07 T 735960-0815 TCE. doc 1 KPG TACOMA. SEATTLE 0, IN ,N 2 ,1; x5._ s s o 0^ 3 o o f a m 1 t N is 04 0 r tvO co 3r ,c) '81 N ...c, 1Z6 f a„ 1 \i/ S 4 F 42 c i 1 J 0 09. 1 Q 0 ...t I i h'� ,1 10 le- O In 1 O O 00_0 a eIk 5° m 0 1 O,, Y C t F .l..1 oN 43. 12 a c o- §I. O '18 (4 $O ��G cq a ''t• 6 el' al ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION PARCEL 735960-0635 RIGHT-OF-WAY ra M a 2 T 0 54 CV a RI r 4 rti w o c cy N 19 o S I l,i N A 9 a �l 9a 13.8 p� F, I A m a p i b m L',1 I o °s la le r 54•1k a s r Cr- v e fl I c iv n I. n in N s" �+.n V M Q V r C 4 tY. Z tti r �i`t N 4 ....1. ....1. r S 6", N 0 'Ef °s or �t o r 35`.3 Ct� S P y (JS rtai f V y a r( VI ss' o z a) m (a. to d' r r o U \/j Y r r w�' q o v 0 w r' $00Q `o 0 t-v 6>b1 os ICI s r h C x Q 8 0 Q h V e 4'L9 PS C L v :7 0 o 0 r w J N IZ °pow m `A W �i P p c E L )C 7 3 59 Co 2 3 S �til 1 I2€ PPI PCEL That portion of Lot 6, lying easterly of State Road Number 1, Block 7, Robbins Spring Brook Addition to Riverton, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 57, in King County, Washington. Co'TA i ti Ir.) C77 190 5 t..J A FEET- 1 L S 1 NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. </e>‘,/ N 89'00'11" E yi EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE ii! rc S. 130TH ST. \z CD. 7 EXISTING ROW 0' 9.15' 6.54' cis LOTS 4 5, BLOCK 7 ROBBINS SPRING BROOK '<x ADITION TO RIVERTON VOL. 16, PG. 57 TAX LOT NUMBER 735960 -0625 3fl SOW N. T.S. 5' SLOPE UTILITY �A\ EASEMENT c Ei 0 715 S.F.f (.3-1 715 \X C. G 12.00' l' 5.00' S i� C 1'), c., V. --55_01, 9.16' 6.55' 0 ec EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE TAX LOT NUMBER 735960 -0635 May 15, 2007 ACAD No. 735960 -0625 S U Esmt WPM EXHIBIT PI' t 1 landscape Architecture PARCEL 735960 -0625 Urban Dccign SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT A 71 PARCEL NO. 735960 -0625 SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THE NORTHEASTERLY 5.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY 12.00 FEET OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL `4. CONTAINING 715 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL A" LOTS 4 AND 5, BLOCK 7, ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION TO RIVERTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 57, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF HERETOFORE CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER 1, BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2014239. E j f♦ 7.,- 2 ,l o f 5 f Y f l i 11115. LY3� �i� rf E 331 5I.3 j EXPIRES 10'01, 0 krl f5 -z2- 735960 -0625 S U esmt.doc 1 KPG T \CON11• SMITH' NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W. M. N 89'00'11" E EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE S. 130TH ST. z N 0 EXISTING ROW c 9.15' i LOTS 4 5, BLOCK 7 ROBBINS TO RIVERTON SPRING VOL. BROOK 16 ADDITIOPG. 57 N °11 TAX LOT NUMBER 3� N.T.S. 735960 -0625 4 W Z 7'= 1 S.F.f ROW x s 7. 00' Y ./N G ,/l>. -7 9.16' s o -5- o EXISTING ROW cc CENTERLINE TAX LOT NUMBER 735960 -0635 May 15, 2007 ACRD No. 735960 -0625 row MPG- EXHIBIT f i2 Landscape PARCEL 735960 -0625 c1711 Ingineerimi Orb= Dedgn RIGHT OF WAY EXHIBIT -77 PARCEL NO. 735960 -0625 RIGHT OF WAY THE SOUTHWESTERLY 7.00 FEET OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL "A CONTAINING 1,001 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "A" LOTS 4 AND 5, BLOCK 7, ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION TO RIVERTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 57, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF HERETOFORE CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER 1, BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2014239. 74 E- M. 4 )mac:, Q L 1 33154 u `fin ,,"�."'j`��'�s EXP ES 10 -01 -11 v 5 -2_-o7 735960 0625 row.doc 1 KPG TACO \A SF: \T 11.F NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. N 89'00'11” E EXISTING ROY/ CENTERLINE ce S. 130TH ST. \Z. 0 7- EXISTING ROW 9.15' 6.54' 10.46' Co, illr 8 LOTS 4 5, BLOCK 7\ OOK ROBBINS SPRING BR s. 73 ADD1 VOL. O 16 PG. TO RIVERTON 57 TAX LOT NUMBER 5960 0625 3o Ru� O �f A� 8' TEMPORARY N. T. S. G CONSTRUC11ON EASEMENT C O 1,09 S.F.± ::3 w uk \jam �L pp� f T V I G 20.00' 2 /s 2 6 y 8.00' ssz i 0 <:\,....,1 C F 49, 0 1.-- s Ls 9 0 S 9 9.16' 6.55' 3.27' o ce lo o -5J L EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE TAX LOT NUMBER 735960 -0635 May 15, 2007 ACAD No. 7.35960-0625 tce KP EXHIBIT A- `Z3 1 PARCEL 735960 -0625 aril `ar'" TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT Urban Design EXHIBIT A Z73 _-L PARCEL NO. 735960 -0625 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THE NORTHEASTERLY 8.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY 20.00 FEET OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL "A. CONTAINING 1,090 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL 'A" LOTS 4 AND 5, BLOCK 7, ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION TO RIVERTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 57, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON,' EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF HERETOFORE CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR STATE HIGHWAY NUMBER 1, BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2014239. p. sue Ai 1 y;:". 4 1:1 0,,-i, yij u ,,it or `k �A-?r X 3V e °17. sit E8 10 -01 5- 2Z -o 7 735960 -0625 tce.doc 1 KP G TACOMA SFATTLF NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E, W.M. IP TAX LOT NUMBER 735960 -0875 N I Jili EXISTING ROW w o� i0' TEMPORARY 0 CO NSTRUCTION 0 EASEMENT 1,729 S.F.t z LOTS 5 6, BLOCK 3 o. ROBBINS SPRING BROOK �6o ADDITION TO RIVERTON VOL. 16, PG. 57 N.T.S. o. 's TAX LOT NUMBER 30' ROW 6 735960 -0310 rn. G .-1) Z Vi 02 Q \15% 0 I o Gj 10.00' o. S t ,1 (2. s EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE 5 EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE May 15, 2007 ACRD No. 735960 -0310 tce ir..PQ EXHIBIT A-2- 1 ,rte PARCEL 735960-0310 Civil Engineering Urban Design TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT EXHIBIT M PARCEL NO. 735960 -0310 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THE SOUTHWESTERLY 10.00 FEET OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL "A CONTAINING 1,729 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL A" LOTS 5 AND 6, LYING EASTERLY OF STATE ROAD NUMBER 1, BLOCK 3, ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION TO RIVERTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 57, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. \��.s. y Fi1 c, i, LA f O c -w O 'A 4 v �1 S�, '4f' 4 c.;31'r J �`�'AL LA EX?iRES 10 -01- O? 5 -22-07 735960 -0310 tce.doc 1 MCP G T \CC~ \L° SF A\ r 11.F NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. LOTS 6 -12, BLOCK 2 ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION TO RIVERTON, VOL 16, PG. 57 TAX LOT NUMBER 735960 -0915 1 0 R= 1842.00' 0 L= 11.95' R= 1850.00' SLOPE UTILI7Y L= 12.00' p 0 EASEMENT 96 S.F.th T.P.O.B. B R= 1850.00' N.T.S. L= 12.13' TOTAL EASEMENT AREA 352 S.F.± o 0� R 6 y p 0 SLOPE UTILITY EASEMENT 256 S.F.± EXISTING ROW \-0 p�/� o- 16' ROW 66 P OINT "A LL '9 0 \6. Z T.P.O.B. \"')-66,.. s. SO .(9' c'? EXISTING ROW 4 L O CENTERLINE P.O.B. June 21, 2007 ACAD No. 735960 -0915 s u esmt Kam'` EXHIBIT ft 1,5 landscape Arrisitectare PARCEL 735960-01 95 ctwil Engineering 'Urban Design SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT 1 PARCEL NO. 735960 -0195 SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL "A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 'A", BEING ON THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE NORTH 41° 06' 59" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN, 22.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 41° 06' 59" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN, 16.00 FEET TO POINT A'; THENCE NORTH 48° 53' 01" EAST, 16.00 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 16.00 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 41° 06' 59" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 16.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 48° 53' 01" WEST, 16.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 256 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORT/ON OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL "A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT SAID POINT A THENCE NORTH 41° 06' 59" WEST ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH), 40.30 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE SOUTH 48° 53' 01" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN, 5.00 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT, THENCE NORTH 41° 06' 59" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN, 49.60 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS NORTH 48° 53' 01" EAST, 1850.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 12.13 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS NORTH 49° 15' 34" EAST, 1850.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 12.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 49° 37' 52 "EAST, 8.00 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 8.00 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS NORTH 49° 37' 52" EAST, 1842.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 11.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49° 15' 34" WEST, 8.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 96 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. TOTAL EASEMENT CONTAINING 352 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL'A' M.6 LOTS 6 THROUGH 12, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 2 ROBBINS SPRING r(\A-■,E. Oi wAS BROOK ADDITION TO RIVERTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT Oo THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 57, IN r ri a KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE STATE OF tt mss WASHINGTON FOR STATE ROAD NO. 1, BY DEED 33154 RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2014241.'O 5� 7 735960 -0195 S U esmt.doc 1 EXPISES 1 `01; 01 6 KPG Zz TACOMA- SEATTLE NW 1/4 SEC. 15, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. s"x\ TAX LOT NUMBER TAX LOT NUMBER N� 734560 -0916 734560 -0917 0 z 0 8.65' PROPERTY LINE v- 8' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 319 S.F.± 5d R 41! R=1860.00' R= 1852.00' L= 41.55' L= 38.08' A PORTION OF TRACT A G ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION O TO RI VERTON, VOL. 16, PG. 57 1 TAX LOT NUMBER 37 735960 -0875 n 2 S N.T.S. -37 O 2 AREA 525 S.F.± O�� s o� O 60 R .5.° 8' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 206 S.F.± o A o o_ O R= 1852.00' 50 R R= 1860.00' L= 30.18' L= 21.52' EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE L= 11.88' June 19, 2007 ACAD No. 735960 -0875 TCE IEPG EXHIBIT A-' 2).0-1 architecture PARCEL 735960 -0875 Cbril Engineering Urban Design TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT EXHIBIT A" ZL° Z PARCEL NO. 735960 -0875 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL "A", LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF A LINE THAT IS 58.00 FEET NORTHEASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH. CONTAINING 525 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL 'A" THAT PORTION OF TRACT A, ROBBINS SPRING BROOK ADDITION TO RIVERTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 16 OF PLATS, PAGE 57, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF STATE ROAD NO. 1 (PACIFIC HIGHWAY). r ,,E. A47);> 1 .00 i y 0 1 Q X3154 d iztzELmes 10 -o1 -Di 29'° 7 735960 -0875 TCE.doc 1 KPG TAC.ONL 5FATTI.F TAX LOT NUMBER SW 1/4 SEC. 10, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. 3.18' 734560 -0910 V I k PROPERTY LINE 0 ir i 0 3' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 509 S.F.± X )e, V;11 N. T.S. al n f p 'o T 0 0 6 Z r \J A call LOT 7, 8, &9 Z m 1 BLOCK 12, RIVERTON Z Z VOL. 13, PG. 36 N e A TAX LOT NUMBER -3 734560 -0916 U Z \C 1 G fl EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE "XI 0 o_ 50 R.014 PROPERTY LINE 3.24' TAX LOT NUMBER 735960 -0875 June 4, 2007 ACRD No. 734560 -0916 TCE K1NC EXHIBIT A- Z laadseaps PARCEL 734560-0916 Urban Design TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT EXHIBIT PARCEL NO, 734560 -0976 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THE SOUTHWESTERLY 3.00 FEET OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL A". CONTAINING 509 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "A" LOTS 7, 8 AND 9, BLOCK 12, RIVERTON, A REPLAT OF A PART OF RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 13 OF PLATS, PAGE 36 IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR A PUBLIC ROAD BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2104244; AND EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 125 FEET OF LOTS 7 AND 8; AND EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 105 FEET OF LOT 9. _ice 40 rt 33154 5APss: 1 D, 10 0 7 07 734560 -0916 TCE.doc 1 G TACOMA- SEATTLE SE 1/4 SEC. 9 SW 1/4 SEC. 10, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. ROW EXISTING ROW VARIES 1011 PROPERTY LINE rn 1 x 1 Z N -1 Z N Z, c) N v C Z7 P V, m �th PROPERT LINE 4} C D n N t 1 SLOPE AND UTILITY 41! --k m EASEMENT 10,985 S.F.± 2. Z ro LOT S Z °rn m TUKWILA BLA NO. L02 -057 f w REC. NO. 2 C. TAX LOT NUMBER CO 734560 -0602 N.T.S. v— t 10.00' J 1 N cm R =1840.00' 6 L= 13.34' 40.00' R= 1800.00' L =15.00' 0," 50, 40'p R R=1840.00' L =1 R= 1860.00' L =135.00' 0 o_ PROPERTY LINE P.O.B. 21.01' June 19, 2007 ACAD No. 734060 -0602 S U Esmt MPG EXHIBIT A l (S -1 Landscape PARCEL 734060 -0602 CITE Engineering "Orb= Design SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT PARCEL NO. 734060 -0602 SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL "A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A", BEING ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WHOSE CENTER BEARS NORTH 73° 27' 46" EAST, 1860.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 135.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12° 22' 44" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 408.67 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT, THENCE NORTH 07° 51' 48" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 229.45 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER SAID PARCEL A THENCE SOUTH 89° 17' 51" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A", 10.11 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 10.00 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 07° 51' 48" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 227.55 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE SOUTH 12° 22' 44" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 281.73 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76° 58' 20" EAST, 10.00 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 20.00 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY MARGIN THENCE SOUTH 12° 22' 44" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 126.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS NORTH 77° 37' 16" EAST, 1840.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 13.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76° 58' 20" EAST, 40.00 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 60.00 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY MARGIN THENCE SOUTHERLYALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS NORTH 77° 12' 39" EAST, 1800.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 76° 58' 20" EAST, 40.00 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 20.00 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY MARGIN THENCE SOUTHERLYALONG SAND PARALLEL LINE ONA CURVE TO THE LEFT WHOSE CENTER BEARS NORTH 76° 44' 19" EAST, 1840.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 111.60 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL "A"; THENCE NORTH 88° 48' 18" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 21.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 10,985 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL 'A ,.,_,.;u LOT 8, CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT ®E A L02-057, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 4 O O 20030327900002, SAID PREMISES LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 11 "Y NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., AND THE SOUTHWEST r QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, 1f 0 T RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 3` 154 2. 41 41, DOD ExP+R S 10-o1- 0 7 734060 -0602 S U esmt. doc 1 KPG T1CONt' 5FJ\TT.F SE 1/4 SEC. 9, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. TAX LOT NUMBER 092.304-9367 PROPERTY LINE 5.13 P.O.B. EXISTING ROW .1!r j CENTERLINE 5' SLOPE UTILITY EASEMENT 277 S.F.t U o rn co cp o \:1 50' ROW 5.00 o _C 5.00 p n D N.T.S. l TAX LOT NUMBER n Z m 092304 -9394 z O Z O >I- o 2 CO l I 10 I PROPERTY LINE EXIS77NG ROW TAX LOT NUMBER PROPERTY LINE 092304 -9116 PROPERTY LINE TAX LOT NUMBER 092.304-9102 May 1, 2007 092.304-9394 s u esmt KID EXHIBIT A Li--t I Lmclacape Arch7 .:W PARCEL 092304-9394 Urban Dadga SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT A c PARCEL NO. 092304 -9394 SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL W, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A", BEING ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE SOUTH 13° 58' 10" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 54.86 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 76° 01' 50" WEST, 5.00 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 5.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY MARGIN; THENCE NORTH 13° 58' 10" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 56.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL A'; THENCE NORTH 89° 01' 13" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, 5.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 277 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "A" THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT INTERSECTION OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (PACIFIC HIGHWAY) WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 89° 01' 13" WEST 105 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10° 18' 47" EAST 135 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 01' 13" EAST 33 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 58' 47" EAST 15 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89° 01' 13" EAST 85 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF SAID STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY 13g1.N.A19RTI1S,1Q S ST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 1 r L 4WM. Ra' w F ice;: S' r te: exPIAES 10 -01- 0 7 092304-93.94 S U esmt.doc 5 1 KPG TACOMA SFATTLF SE 1/4 SEC. 9 SW 1/4 SEC. 10, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. m x 1 LOT 7, TUKWILA BLA NO. L04 -060 c REC. NO. 20041008900012 z1 TAX LOT NUMBER 0 102304 -9080 iill C n 10.00' n Z V iii N.T.S. co •._.0 Z co O r- co c C CO 10' SLOPE AND UTILITY v EASEMENT 689 S.F.f z Q Ot N t3 N P O B 1 PROPERTY LINE 1 10.11' z v di EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE o• co TAX LOT NUMBER 734060 -0602 t t ROW VARIES June 19, 2007 ACAD No. 102304 -9080 S U Esmt icitia EXHIBIT R''0 k r PARCEL 102304-9080 Urban Design SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT 1, 30 PARCEL NO. 102304 -9080 SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL 'A", DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 'A", BEING ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE NORTH or 51' 48" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, 68.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 82° 08' 12" EAST, 10.00 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 10.00 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID EASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 07° 51' 48" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 69.68 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 'A"; THENCE NORTH 89° 17' 51" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, 10.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 689 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL 'A" LOT 7, CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. L04 -060, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20041008900012, SAID PREMISES LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. t L 4 1 t... ..te p, 4, p 6 33154 p h mses 100 &-20- 102304 -9080 S U esmt.doc 1 KPG TAC=OMA. SEATTLE SE 1/4 SEC. 9, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. --t 1 el C nr 1 PARCEL A D TUKWILA BLA N0. 98 -0033 0 Z 1 REC. NO. 9810059013 TAX LOT NUMBER 092304 -9367 Z N.T.S. �o z SLOPE UTILITY c� EASEMENT 169 S.F. f 10.00' r 1 z Vir d ,4 cn o 4; PROPERTY LINE 10.26' P.0.8. 1 EXISTING ROW CENTERLINE 1 TAX LOT NUMBER t 1 092304 -9394 50� ROW 1 i EXISTING ROW June 27, 2007 ACAD No. 092.304-9367 s u K I D EXHIBIT l 3 l 1 e Arobltaaturo PARCEL 092304 936 7 SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT 1I 31 PARCEL NO. 092304 -9367 SLOPE AND UTILITY EASEMENT THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL A DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL "A", BEING ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF TUKWILA INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD (PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH); THENCE NORTH 89° 30' 27" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL 'A", 10.26 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS 10.00 FEET WESTERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WESTERLY MARGIN THENCE NORTH 12° 22' 44" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL. LINE, 15.71 FEET; THENCE NORTH 77° 37' 16" EAST, 10.00 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY MARGIN THENCE SOUTH 12° 22' 44" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY MARGIN, 18.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 169 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL `A" PARCEL A, CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 98 -0033, RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9810059013, BEING A PORTION OF THE FOLLOWING: THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. s`1 40 j 7 1 i ill yA 331 4 4 dpi, LAI49 EXPIRES 10- 01 -cil 092304-.9367 S U esmt.doc 1 KP G T\COMA• SFATTLF EXHIBIT "B" RIGHT -OF -WAY PLANS 110110 al 1'1 c-----\ v 461 411 I1 �A Awe+4 it -11° 4 f „r„, ll. ,err 0.....1, k4 1 1--,=. 0 `a w ul d 6 s e!Fa Q 0 TCS io 2 _it: -wie,---r4 A, ii f t I Q cc sir, Z o CC F a a IAA 4 Z a U ti.. [GZ„S0 O �4 t .,.k V QUp y�Z 0 :r. Z�w a4w Ca Ce) CIA O U IZA f 3 A U cc 2 N Q z 0 a c tit 4 Z o o cd ta Z r tit U k Z p U ■t Q Z r a List T d+ p' J r Z U= I� 'i O�j q c4 0 co W v m N NZ a re# .J\ 5 ii woo (1) C:=1 ,s lit vil we didiaa i 2--- 1 'Ali J z oti 1331S 0D+Stt 'CIS 3N11 MYR ---1 4 TF i• I 1 f. 7f Ca t S ir 1 1; i J r, z c; Z Lt 0 .1 CL )ti cn EP,.E15gg Z o 11111 V 1 I li.1 IL o o 1 1 i 1 I 1 I 1 I I- 1 5111.11i 0 1- --------1 ...i .1 I JO 1— r----- 1. 5 i i t 1 I I: I I bill! 1l T pluzi I i 2 2 t ai 4,1 cl A 1 S 133 T g V.' C 4 4 1.1 0 ,U2 P CI c) r2 Ga 3 2 ).4. a l e I v i 330 t all i in 1 VW 11 111 e, 1 t 4 v{5t Y15 WI 1Yfl Q C 110 4 13316 r i S 1\; I r i z Q I Q pJ.. 4 I mnt —i— I 3 1 1 W O I o 1 i 1 1 i.,. I\ ....1 I B T_ I g I kf \R t11111 H!, 1 I i\.9.., 1 MOUS 4 ti o aa1 I Y I t. l 1 r I Ott t, x I z og. A 5 't i Vici Ir V 1 T:: V, 1, 1 1 1 .,;_il -1- z, r' m x ga m nt O I s 1 I „,c> s I '1 04 133x5 44 +6t1 Y15 3>t� $401:0 1 f h 7 1 livai op 1 6 i 1 0 0 .4 8 CL M mii 1 t MO 1331G 00+6i V1S 35I1 HOOT( i •A I 1 ',1 F. 1 1 1.12 i I I "1 ,-i., 0 ■I i .03% 1 2 i 03 0 _1 9 i 4.1, 1 0 !I 1 Z 0) I I Z <CP. 0 I k, i I ,1 7 40 Si 1 li 2 g 0 i 11.1111 et 1 1 LU L. :Hi 1 1 i i 1 i ,,4- 1 ir:„,-__ I ii,,III <C E s r,•; k 1 (7) -2 I s i fl t: D P. i 1 1" 1.1.1 'et i _..1 r i- -k\ 1 ri .__L] 1 pol I T 2 1, 8 c,3 1 j ill!! .T 1 if naquil i L 4 2 t'..S 11 1 1 j I .1 i 11 ,00 L. g 1 i 3 co e E4 g i 0 OgIN CII -1--5 i ki Sg- 6 q a uf r A T 1 1 i -""•Tr; 41 R- i 1 i e l'- ti, w I 1: 4 Q 1 lw 0 if :k4 1 zw L tu i CD v 0 ea -1 s d Eg v„,, L-- o L 1..1 LI z ht7a imms 00+55 Ivrim_ill 4 0 4 gin: f o Id" M 0 0 g5 5 e *O 133 same YLS 3 n tcu'm 1 „0,3-g--- g CO tO !Dig m rol� 1 I OZ J Q N``:I l a I I I I I I- J .V I 1 W L f�, N I I I I o ImY 1 i. Ii` I Z �1 1� 4s �I I Q c� L I J a 1 IL L +zyl i l Y. xx CC tL pDYI f r C� m I, c Y g rt pro, o 0 3 —TJ I k j M �j Iv `t= l I L I e gi t l p.< .`4 ill 8'-.. 1 .g-.1i..... I� ©1 j k E ill 1 i 1 7 5 m'LQ T/\ C 'i ti s A L a p. s 'J I ri d w am 11:--'--- m re 3.s 0 f AN 13 0 +6S1 YLS 314,1 MILYH XQ rO 3 f a 6 w m ii. We 'ilia.' ,r, t-,-- 1 J v g 6 J 0 q .0,, f3313S tlI 5 91 V1 5 f�l t 8 J i 1,Igg 0 Q a 1I'1['I HO i L s t f I f j l l9 LO 1 S 1 Q a 4 F- 1 Y n� ti m 1 2 ii 1 t 3._ I 1 iII o 11111 1 1 flI j 1 1 i 1 i e.i :i .,St 1 rig a t i -5;i: 1 a a 1 1 oo. N �1 r f 4 7 2 y y Z l 1 I g 7 I 1 lt I W silt 1 t NAH 133HS 5L +Y91 YLS Wi Fgivn (E.? 1 li Ct', 3 1 4 a ihuirie 1611 -\\c-s, 1 2 `=s 0 1 1 a 1 CO o t` s Q zo. t S V i 1 1 1 ,g' 1-- 0 1 1 i 111 o° 1 1 t I''' V..- a I l I lr1 1 ;111 1 l Q E— 1I t 3 t t til 1 patt lit \_1_*414 .4 A si$i j y I .s E. 9 Z.1" -1- I Om I if.. q 5 it iii° g Tfil 71 -Axel-- F t r-ti a g 3 r: f s MI DRS 00+6% 'OS �n w>.rn ,\___,-.,,d 6 8 B�S�V i I is r z. al I 4 Si til iiii N -'R 1 10 16 m et° h m s (.tf g a _r 7----- 03 0 ��e ,as ral erg:/ 1 -1 o n o i 1 a <t 0 ili lit 1 z .'..c. d `s a Cc. .t t_ :_c i i t a j 1 ;i jar \1 v* 1 s• alp, 1 ,,t1� 1 v t *c..1, 11 Al 1 tlii kl 1 Vitt 0 nnetit r‘ C% I t I I f I A t" ri \IA! i --I i,,,-,fi 11 .i d I 1 t C 1 1 -,1,.y, all 1 1 5�c5 ,1' a l i v \n a> p su�i g 0= `i Ci7 m 35 C c 1 t Cli 1, 1 j' l z y s 0 VI A i i v a p i /1 X M1 6 00-14L! Y1.3� Fb1Y(i a is 461 itaiblit° ,.'-i-- 9 .a, r 1'gal I s AU ins m }rai US 3N11 Faun Q 2 41 N I i a Z Q- i I Fl i 1 1 1 W 6' Q 1 �1 1 1 Q F 41 -440 Ln i V t:ifi I vl _a ic t12%1 r 1 I, 1 8 oap1 I i` F r j J 1 II% A 4 n C I I a 1 1 �z 1 C4 F l,.f 1 t 1 6 i I a r t `pl y. \I: 1. 1 t sae 1.' w, E SL 5- I ms' J w' c7 I 4 '14, i 1 :.-7---,N 'it 'it V4 J l s i� rq t 1 i'' L L 7 1 li►•I :iik 19111 W iii dila:a 3 3 �t o �g 0= cc ---r- of ioi 1334is 00+681 Y1s 3Ni Rum 1 E )-.I I i t I r o muz s J I i m o L J h b Z Q 92 p s I _r i son 2 Q a r A l I I i E2E Q Q i o I I I I z r I I 1 I l l l i Q o I II 3 N II 1-- II g I g 11 X a 411 t` 1 a1 r o a�$i8 I p .E53 ,I' 1 m9 R o f W ti A 2 1E0000. a 1 a d 1 tiz Cr4 It' 8 ppy 133F6 00 +1 e 1 YSS 3 X A R Cl i pr i, s ,A i MM mfr al l ill &;yam:` 1 o 44 1 1033 i3#5 VV. VSS 3hT i m 0 ii, 14 ..1 t _14-_---,.., R N I 4 S I 1 0 O I 4 1 1 1 Z m I o 4 it' �i 1 t ii 1 g 1 Awl ke s s 1 i11111 I x ��xQO� 4 DD 'I Frat. I I /1\ r I -i A m 1 1 s y• I 8 13 f 11 I I Y trio a g. m i R �G f`� 4 H Z 1 Y A ♦al J t 1 sss �av ter- s a I 4 I 1 W'7t 4. I c :„...,1 'i 1 1 I 1 j" i 00454 VSS 3M NaNit C 10 "I`iilawrioi W Si is AB'S r---- i CW I 1 s n AU1 4 01m 0S 00+56,Y153101 1 1 0 i 1 1 1 t •J I 1 Lis 0 1 1 o 4, A 1 i i -J I t I Z �m 0 4. 1 1 Zu Q Q I 1 F R 9 Z 0 1 W r 1 I �t w 1 1 1 I p iE— o I I 1. i 1 z r+ 1 1 1 I I I r 1 d 1 1 1 1 4 I I 1 I I m it 1 1 ,x ..,,,,,,L tt ----\4"'"I -1 7 1, 11.......-". ig p tAiii silus ti 1 1 \II h lc 1 c.e, .1. .1. 1 1 i, is \ti,S.1,,, Ds \i ll:1 L 1 I �s tilt 1`P I 1 1 1 w I o 8 3 W o j z -it 17- I R P I m yz PZ2 i I b pain I W ii R R3 I 1 t 13 315 001 Y15 7 m Film o, us 7 +o .tA iii►n:rrrani Nil rrth:W 1 vigil l 0 o a r y .1 1 YIt Lt MOti 13325 000"°4 pE Y15 F■L 1 1 1 1 1 1 f Q 1 1 1 1 1 i J I I 1 i m O 1 1 O J p 11a. r Y� 3 Q z 1 Z Q N 4 g NI 1 Z Q I I 1 3 i 1 1 1 1 1 w I 1 1 2I II Z i 1 I 1 I I I EE 1 5 1 1 I 1 .-1 1 1 1 3 1 o I Y 1 n 1 1— I 1' s t J 1 1 s i I R o s I :g- a�QIII o� E E: 'M F i /1 g 5 E EN I` A I I 0 :i° 1n $bC+661 q U R I n ti x W 11 M08 1336 00 +661 YJS 3N1 1t71Y11 Q 1 w milieliNflob Nil 6 Iii:N 1 M i Cc 11` Alg 1 1.1 E IDS 00 +60Z Y1S Nfl I431YR I i 1 Q 1 m o o J a g Z QN tL a E N W R g a H. 1-- I 1 ti i W o0 I §l o ij 4C tz (NI —1 a 3 N 01 I- I 1 :I o s W c i i L o 11111 1 f IO 0oo ©s l I. t 1 ip EN I A S 1 1: CO s 9ZTY+9 X id y w 1 y.� I G gv r/1 a 1 t 1 I: I II m Jl 1 1 1 Is) 1 F 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 0 t n I I 1 I; I I m 1 1 I_ V 1 I j Z I' V a 1 1 s r 1: E `I 1: m z 1 i ^I 1 Ij gF 1 i I I I I It 1, .0 e ZI ,lpN 13365 Oo+YOi: Y15 31n min+ 4e 3 1 St MOS 13345 OO+tIZ KIS 3171 MKS m o 0 1 4 1 Q aN t i rt e a >-N 1 j X. 1 I G i j I 1 Z i6' 1. 1 z� I 1 1 t (?0 t 1 1 1 1 I t J a s t Y 1 u- I H o t Est- u t 1 7 t N n 1 1 1 t g R 1 1 R 11 g 1 I 1 lit:, S 15 II 1 t 1 t 1 1 1 o H I 1 N 1 1 I 1 1 E 1 1�t. A. l I l r t 1 7 1 N 1 1 N 1 1 1 t 1 I O E t 1 0 t 1 I' 1 N t 1 v 1 t z I• V a I 1 1 m 1' W 1 1 1 t_ `l i 1 11 l 1 t 11 a IS 1 i 1 i y t7 {t�1YI1 E) xx1 00 cc cr 4 y x I sl Mori 00+61Z rls 181 Fnim s CI Iii m o g J o 8 u z 0) 2 a ka 2 as N F- 2 8 ix In 8. F W g a i I I I I I I W I- L o I I i 00 Z 'o I I I I I i =I- N J D H n 7 u)) 0 isinsi 5 1 a l o E o tI. xxx� 11 U 17fI7©I i 1 \i 1 1 a 1 1 i i 41 i ii z A i 14 1 to 1 Cl 1 k t 1 N 1 l C 1 1 N N j O k 1 1 F 1 1 y{ 1 1 1 1 }i a i 1 1 V m iii is `�1iz i i ^I vz 1 i s I.J 1 1 1 r i \i a µ•rn I 1 Vi CA i Li 4 021 L33t• W+rtt VLS An HOW! i N J oC3 0 .t o Z ZN N O da i Q 4 cn W 30 w s c G 00 Z O I o N W I i I is i 1 t 1 i 1 1 I l t11 I Stgi t t 1 t CM I t OS 1 1 1 U at t t a VI ti 1 t t 1 1 1 M 1 I a 1 1 t 1 i 4 I I I t 1 1 1 U t 1 it le w yl MZ t .t t ti +w r- es 1�°a 1334 °41 vss y ,01-114 Cli e S •0 V, -1 a •1' o o.$ 6 3 I a a Nike. I Q s J S R m 0 W ._i 0 lig ..cc z O Q N Z a 0 00 Z z cj- Q 0 N _J 41$4,9 (1) rg 41 11 7 fth oaQal 7 RI A; v— a u w "F Mal r�'t w fa ,1,;f! �w 1 IJ i gu z i 1 I 9,04 1 3asoo -fw v15 3tY1 tAlYfl J !1 1 t)^fll a r 0 SA J o i y. City of Tukwila zl Transportation Committee rsos TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes April 23, 2007- 5:00 p.m. PRESENT Councilmembers: Pam Carter, Chair; Pam Linder and Verna Griffin (sitting in for Joe Duffie) Absent: Joe Duffie (excused) Staff: Jim Morrow; Frank Iriarte; Bob Giberson; Pat Brodin; Robyn Tischmak and Kimberly Matej CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Carter called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. I. PRESENTATIONS No presentations. II. BUSINESS AGENDA A. Resolution Sunnortina the Integrated Roads and Transit Plan Jim Morrow presented the Committee with a resolution establishing the City's general support of the adoption of the Integrated Roads and Transit Plan. This Plan was developed through the collaborative efforts of the Regional Transportation District and Sound Transit. The Plan provides an integrated set of highway and transit improvements for the Puget Sound region. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO COW FOR DISCUSSION. B. Tukwila International Blvd Phases 2 3 Road Improvements Right- of -Wav /Condemnation Ordinance In order to move forward on Tukwila International Boulevard Phase 2 and 3 Road Improvements certain properties /parcels in the area require right -of -way or easements. Although it is highly unlikely that any parcel will require condemnation, due to time constraints, the establishment of this ordinance will prepare the City to begin the condemnation proceedings for any parcel which is not acquired through the negotiation process. This process was utilized in Phase 1 of the same project and the City did not need to condemn any property. If the City were to wait to establish this ordinance until after negotiations with property owners, the time consuming condemnation proceedings could cause a delay in the project. Another advantage of establishing this process beforehand is that is assists the City in negotiations with the property owners. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO COW FOR DISCUSSION. C. 2007 First Ouarter Report 2007 First Quarter Reports were reviewed for the Public Works Depaitment. Committee Chair Carter complimented Public Works for completion of Budget Program Goals, Equipment Rental, Performance, No. 1, almost three months in advance of the originally stated date. INFORMATION ONLY. COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS ITEM No. 1, ,1 =41 Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor's review cowl/ review 2 s 7/9/07 FI L i) t 7/16/07 1 Ff�-Y) 1 C/ 1 iso 1 U 1 ITEM INFORMATION 1 CAS NUMBER: 07-089 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: JULY 9, 2007 AGENDA ITEM TITLE Authorization to Purchase Emergency Advisory AM Radio System and Resolution of Sole Source Purchase from Information Station Services (ISS) CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other Mtg Date 7/9/07 Mtg Date Mtg Date 07/16/07 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date iVltg Date SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P Police PIS SPONSOR'S The City recently leased a portable 10 watt, AM Radio System to conduct a feasibility study SUMMARY and determine whether the system could be used to broadcast emergency and non emergency information to Tukwila residents, businesses, and visitors. Based on the results of day and nighttime studies, staff determined that the Emergency Advisory AM Radio System would serve as an excellent venue for information on emergency situations or events affecting the community. Due to the technical nature of the AM Radio equipment, staff recommends ISS as a sole source vendor. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. ['Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DA'Z'E: 7/02/07 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. Authorize purchase and approve resolution. COMffrriE Unanimous approval; forward to COW. COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $32,000.00 $50,000.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 000.13.525.100.49.00 Emergency Operations Comments: Funds for EOC Phase I and Public Information for $50, 000 was approved by Council on 5/21/07. MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 7/9/07 7/16/07 j MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 7/9/07 Information Memo dated July 03, 2007 with 3 attachments Resolution Finance Safety Committee Meeting Minutes from July 2, 2007 1 7/16/07 INFORMATION MEMO To: Mayor Mullet From: Jim Morrow Date: July 03, 200 Subject: Emergency Advisory AM Radio System ISSUE Should City establish an emergency AM radio station? BACKGROUND Many local and state governments, departments of transportation, private industry, points of entry (customs, and border patrols), schools and universities, military, and federal entities throughout the United States operate FCC- licensed Emergency Advisory Radio Stations to inform motorists and the public what to do during amber alerts, school incidents, earthquakes, flooding, major fires, and other types of emergencies. Through public safety managed radio broadcasts, listeners can receive current reports and alerts regarding road closures, detours, and construction delays. During non emergencies, communities can use the Emergency Advisory AM Radio Station to inform the public about upcoming events and visitor information. DISCUSSION The City recently leased a portable 10 watt, AM Radio System from Information Station Specialist (ISS) to conduct a feasibility study and determine if the system could provide adequate coverage throughout the City. Shortly after the portable unit arrived, staff conducted day and nighttime tests. Attachments 1 -3 depict the test results. Attachment 1 depicts coverage from the reservoir and the EOC using the initial frequency assigned by the FCC (1650 KHz). As indicated in the map, coverage was woefully inadequate despite several system adjustments. Although signal distances could be reduced depending on several factors such as hilly terrain, high voltage overhead power wires, and building structures, these systems are designed to cover approximately 3 -5 miles during daylight hours. As a result of the issues encountered during the initial test phase, the FCC through ISS changed the City's frequency to 1660 KHz. As noted in attachments 1 -2, the new frequency provided significantly improved the coverage throughout the City. Based on the results of the day and nighttime testing, staff has concluded that with the exception of high voltage line interference, and potential in- building reception issues due to building structure and distance from the AM transmitting antenna, the Emergency Advisory AM Radio Station will provide coverage to almost the entire City. Should the City decide to purchase an Emergency Advisory AM Radio Station, the cost for a standard system plus signs placed strategically throughout the City is approximately, $32,000 plus tax. Due to the technical nature of the radio equipment, staff recommends sole source procurement from ISS (Draft Sole Source Resolution is attached). Other Advisory AM Radio systems are designed strictly for the traffic industry and have limited capabilities. The Advisory AM Radio Station will serve as a venue to broadcast official, timely and critical emergency /non- emergency public information. RECOMMENDATION Present to Committee of the Whole for discussion and approval. Attachments: 1. 1650 KHz Coverage 2. 1660 KHz Coverage Daytime 3. 1660 KHz Coverage Nighttime 4. Draft Sole Source Resolution (P:Users\Frank\2.007\Emergency Management\Info Memo, Alert AM Emergency Radio System) Reservoir ot.„...: 7. s 0 is, Coverage 1 Daytime Test Date: TWeaertae Weather 2 p7 1 a0 J r u u y n June Cloudy Frequency: 1650 KHZ SI'S. '4 t s '-n. i 6 .g 1 S 1 elk 4 -L.. Inillif'.9 --------7 r 1.7° s M It a, 0-4,4( --__=,-.1, tt l it* e "6 I =7 _,:-.1: 7-'---- ■A i'.-,,;j.—' :-1 .___;-,J -_,T,f,_:: -.,9L- WO- z -_;-g, iii =-__f_, W Zi mfr., _ii Ai, zs.. i, 1 o -----7---m-- Pt- 7-14- 2 _L717 1 i r = ---.:----,_AFEL-- ---o--,—a—,W. 3 A 771 7--- NOT TO SCALE i Map Legend Reservoir pr 2 mile buffer e Good Coverage z: r: u Limited Coverage el Bad Cove-rage F-71 Waterbody Gis A ,,mi „,..f 3 City Limits 1 y g Reservoir Coverage 2 yr Daytime Test T� Date: 26 Pa June y 20 y _i_ s Weath rtl Clud g Temp: 68-78 e Frequency 16601Q-1Z rasc gsra' v. Vmn'. -1 -t1._ -1 ovt 3,. r ya e- w 1 ti: y s -�-4, -f7r �7 a tea J fit,, l gal: "te -i 4 ice■ t i m (i) rga:=-7:-.____.,_-__--- NOT TO SCALE Map Legend l Reservoir 2 mile buffer I M Good Coverage /L Limited Coverage Bad Coverage Fi Waterbody �d Ci Limits TuloAdlicr ..T._ f GIS 1 ee*-- Reservoir 111 Coverage 3 1 .ili Night Test z.n D re a m p: 2 6 8- 8_ 2 7 9 June 2007 t Weather: Rain, Windy Frequency 1660 KHZ ----f 1 P 1-_-7A-A.-',-='---..rA: LimoN 4 t l E.A.;, r-__. .,c, s, t ........„..„...„„:_* Lii lag 4 ,1-=_ E La n a! ,_:-,A c___ ..V',. ip*.N I\ 1 zi---- mi:::-., go:: 1„,.... .4 4 s a -----,,,,,A. N A -----w E -----a-w---------,- -1- _„---_---,-,---r, f -4 7 A ,V_W .--EL ,•3- 1 -A -FW: .=-1,77 W atly -----0-- s ,,m-- 5 7= ---_-m c 7 A ;;Iii7r, 7 "A, 7_ N tk......„A -.4 .Z t i -4,- I 7 A '5 47 _4 EDT 1 ar! 5s ,--,a -r•-_- g fi --2= --4-7 1 ___:-i i 7.--_,Tre= -0;,....4. 1 Z- -7 roic7i, Fs.: a, 7== :-.s: z ,t4 =7 i 7...k4 Z Z- --i ;i 7 Z':_- (ill) ----7-----T- -------14---i L' s- 13,.. v p __=T it- NOT TO SCALE Map Legend 11 -7,-, ,F 0 Reservoir 2 mile buffer Good Coverage Limited Coverage El Bad Coverage F1 Waterbcdy C) City Limits GIS Tukwila i /7 //-ii,-% II DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, WAIVING THE BIDDING REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF AN EMERGENCY ADVISORY A.M. RADIO STATION FROM INFORMATION STATION SPECIALISTS, INC. WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila has determined a need to enhance communications to residents, businesses and visitors in the event of emergencies; and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila has leased a portable AM Radio System to conduct a feasibility study and determine if the system could adequately broadcast emergency and non emergency information throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the Alert AM Emergency Advisory Radio Station from Information Station Specialists, Inc. (ISS) provides the best technology, technical support structure, system flexibility, nonproprietary designs and proven experience; and WHEREAS, other Advisory AM Radio systems are designed strictly for the traffic industry and have limited capabilities; and WHEREAS, several cities and government entities within the State of Washington have purchased Alert AM Emergency Advisory Radio Systems from ISS for emergency preparedness and broadcast of official and current public information; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The bidding requirement for the purchase of the ISS Alert AM Emergency Advisory Radio Station is hereby waived. Section 2. The Public Works Department is authorized to purchase the Alert AM Emergency Advisory Radio Station from Information Station Specialists, Inc., in the amount of $32,000. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2007. AI TTEST/ AUTHENTICATED: Verna Griffin, Council President Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Office of the City Attorney Resolution Number: C :tDocuments and Settings\All Users' DesF. op \Kelly\MSDATAAResolutions\Sole Source ISS.doc GL:ksn 7/5/2007 Page 1 of 1 City of Tukwila al •w: Finance Safety Committee �r`sos j FINANCE AND SAFETY COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes July 2, 2007- 5:00 p.m. PRESENT Councilmembers: Jim Haggerton, Chair; Joan Hernandez and Dennis Robertson Staff: Jim Morrow, Frank Iriarte, Shelley Kerslake, Rhonda Berry and Kimberly Matej Guests: Chuck Parrish CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Haggerton called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Committee Chair Haggerton amended Section 11, Business Agenda, with the addition of Item B, Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims with Yakima County Depaitment of Corrections. City Attorney Shelley Kerslake will discuss the item. I. PRESENTATIONS No presentations. II. BUSINESS AGENDA A. Status Renort of First Phase of Emergency Management Initiative Staff has returned to Committee to present a progress update on the implementation of the emergency management initiatives which were approved by Council approximately month ago. A proposal was received on Friday (June 29) from a design consultant for standby power. Staff will review the proposal, and if it meets City standards and needs it will be forthcoming to Council. Preliminary results of the seismic study have been received and are being reviewed by staff. Results of the City's seismic capability will be presented to the Committee at future meeting. The American Red Cross has been contacted for information regarding DERT purchases. Limited vendor availability may result in a sole source purchase. As of June 28, Personnel staff completed the classification work and salary structure for both emergency management positions and provided respective recommendations to Administration. As soon as the positions have been approved, staff can begin recruitment. Staff has been testing an AM radio station for use in broadcasting and improving public information communication throughout the City. AM radio stations are used by many local governments throughout the nation. These radio stations are licensed by the FCC to provide emergency and non emergency information such as amber alerts, severe weather conditions, natural and manmade disasters, terrorist events, traffic delays, road closures and public information and community events. The only restriction is that it should not be used for promotional use. The 10 -watt system staff has been testing does not have wide coverage and is intended strictly for local community use. Staff has performed several coverage tests on the station and has determined that frequency 1660 provides the best overall broadcasting City -wide. The Finance Safety Comm ittee Minutes July 2, 2007 Page 2 system vendor, Information Station Services in Michigan, has stated that a permanent unit will also increase and improve coverage. To date, it has cost the City $900 to test the unit. The purchase of a permanent system which includes antennae, transmitter, receiver, digital recording system and remote telephone transmission will costs approximately $25,000- $32,000. Staff originally brought this item to the Committee for informational purposes only; however, the Committee was impressed by the progress of implementing a local AM radio station as a means to improve public information and recommended forwarding this specific item to the next COW for staff presentation and full Council discussion. The Committee was very complimentary of staff. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JULY 9 COW B. Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims with Yakima County Department of Corrections City Attorney Shelley Kerslake briefed the Committee on this settlement agreement between 33 cities and Yakima County jail which will be brought to tonight's Council meeting as Item 7 under New Business. An item of this type would usually be discussed in executive session but since no strategy is involved in ongoing litigation at this point, an executive session is not necessary. In 2003, we began paying a per bed price to Yakima County for incarceration services. These payments were being made in anticipation of the opening of a new jail. In 2004, it became apparent that the jail was not going to open. Additionally, there were some concerns over the treatment of inmates. In response, a lawsuit was filed against Yakima for breach of contract. After working for a year to resolve the issues, the inmate problems have been addressed and we have monitoring the program, and the County has agreed to open jail in full by December 31, 2007. The settlement does not involve any exchange of funds, and minimal costs were incurred as a result of the settlement of this issue. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JULY 2 REGUALR MEETING. III. ANNOUNCEMENTS No announcements. IV. MISCELLANEOUS Committee Chair Haggerton restated a request for some financial information that the Committee would like to discuss at a future Finance and Safety meeting. The information is listed below. Amount of the City's indebtedness, broken down by amounts of the original loans Amount of the annual debt service payments Amount the City currently owns on the Tukwila Village property Amount of annual debt service payments for Tukwila Village bonded indebtedness Amount of bonding capacity the City has left Additionally, Dennis' records regarding the funding amount that has been spent to date on Tukwila Village does not correspond with the amount listed in the budget. He would like to discuss this further with staff who oversees the CIP budget in order to identify the accuracy of the dollar figure associated with the project. Meeting adjourned at 5:59 p.m. Next meeting: Monday, July 16, 2007 5:00 p.m. Conference Room 3 /41 I Committee Chair Approval Minutes by KAM. COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS o Initials ITEM NO. i iVIeetinn Date Prepar by 1vlayor'r review I Council review F z; 05/14/07 I 7P I 1 07/09/07 1 JP `1 (rvit 1 isoa,�_ I I 1 I J =ITEM INFORMATION CAS NUMBER: 07-056 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: MAY 14, 2007 AGENDA ITEM TITLE SEPA Code Amendment CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other Mtg Date 7/9/07 Mtg Date Mtg Date tbltg Date 07/16/07 Alt Date Mtg Date 07/16/07 Mtg Date SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs -1 DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PW SPONSOR'S The proposal is to raise certain SEPA (State Environmental Policy Act) review thresholds SUMMARY and streamline the review process by combining comment periods. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 4- 10 -07, 6 -26 -07 (CAP), 5 -14 -07 (COW), 5 -24 -07 (PC) RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Forward PC Recommendation to COW COM IIITEE Approve PC Recommendation; Forward to COW COST- MPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0 $0 $0 Fund Source: N/A Comments: MTG. DATE- RECORD OF CO=UNCIL ACTION 5 -14 -07 Forward to Planning Commission for a recommendation -MTG DATE ATTACHMENTS 5 -14 -07 1 Information Memo dated 5/9/07 Minutes from the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting of 4/10/07 7 -9 -07 Information Memo dated 6/28/07 1 Minutes from the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting of 6/26/07 INFORMATION MEMORANDUM To: Mayor Mullet Committee of the Whole FROM: Jack Pace, Acting DCD Directo DATE: June 28, 2007 SUBJECT: Code Amendment SEPA BACKGROUND The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) requires that a standard checklist be filled out by a project proponent to identify the environmental impacts of certain actions. Actions include grading, dredging, paving, construction or demolition of buildings, and adoption or revision of most plans, policies or regulations by a government agency. The intent is to identify environmental impacts that would otherwise "fall through the cracks" and provide a mechanism for public review and mitigation. Jurisdictions have flexibility in setting the thresholds that trigger SEPA review up to the maximum level allowed by the State. If a project is exempt in one category but triggers SEPA in another then SEPA is required. For example a three lot short plat on a hillside would be exempt from SEPA review unless the cut and fill required exceeded 500 cubic yards. Type of Action Tukwila's Maximum PC Proposed Threshold Threshold Thresholds Residential 4 dwelling units 20 dwelling units 9 dwelling units Construction Commercial/Industrial 4,000 sf and 20 12,000 sf and 40 12,000 sf and 40 Construction parking spaces parking spaces parking spaces Parking Lots 1 40 parking spaces 1 40 parking spaces 1 No Change 1 Landfills or 500 cubic yards 500 cubic yards No Change Excavations Jurisdictions can also take advantage of an optional SEPA process that allows them to identify projects where significant adverse environmental impacts are unlikely and combine the comment period on that determination with the notice of application comment period for the underlying permit. The CAP reviewed this proposal on April 10, 2007 and recommended approval of all changes except there was no consensus on raising the threshold for single family construction. At the COW meeting on May 14 the Council opted to send the proposal to NG Page 1 06/28/2007 2:40:00 PM Q: \CODEA IND \SEPAChanges \7- 9COW the Planning Commission and ask for their input on the single family threshold. The PC held a hearing on May 24 and supported raising the threshold to 9 dwelling units for single family construction as well as the changes to the commercial threshold and the optional DNS process. The CAP supported the PC recommendations and forwarded the item to COW. ANALYSIS Tukwila and other agencies with penniitting authority have a comprehensive set of regulations to control negative impacts in the following areas that are subject to SEPA review: 1. Grading, filling, unstable soil and erosion (Tukwila Sensitive Area Ordinance, International Building Code, PW Standards) 2. Air emissions (Puget Sound Clean Air Agency) 3. Surface water (wetlands and watercourses), groundwater, and storm water (Tukwila Sensitive Area Ordinance, King County Surface Water Design Manual) 4. Vegetation and landscaping (Landscape Chapter of the Zoning Code, Tree Ordinance) 5. Animals, endangered species, wildlife habitat (ESA, Tukwila Sensitive Area Ordinance) 6. Energy and natural resources (Building and Mechanical Codes) 7. Environmental health, hazardous waste and noise (Tukwila Noise Ordinance, Hazardous Waste Regulations, Department of Ecology) 8. Land and shoreline use (Zoning Code, Shoreline Master Program) 9. Housing (IBC, Zoning Code, Design Review) 10. Aesthetics, design review (Design Review) 11. Light and glare (IMC, Zoning Code, Design Review) 12. Recreation (Parks Department, Zoning Code recreation space requirements) 13. Historic and cultural preservation (No listed structures in Tukwila, Archaeological and Paleontological preservation requirements) 14. Transportation, traffic and parking (Level of Service Standards, PW Concurrency Requirements, Transportation Impact Fees, Capital Improvement Program, Zoning Code Parking requirements) 15. Public services Concurrency Requirements) 16. Utilities, sewer and water concurrency (Concurrency Requirements) Because these codes and standards are already in place we do not often have to rely on SEPA to impose mitigation conditions. Raising the threshold for number of new NG Page 2 06/28/2007 2:40:00 PM Q:\ CODEA, viND\SEPAChanges \7- 9COW_SEPA.DO C dwelling units to 9 would match the threshold for subdivision review. Raising the threshold for new buildings in commercial/industrial zones to 12,000 sf and 40 parking spaces would streamline review of smaller projects. As an example the Claim Jumper restaurant is approximately 12,000 sf. Because SEPA triggers notice requirements some smaller projects that do not require other approvals such as design review would no longer require public notice if the threshold were changed. Short plats for 5 or more lots are required to provide public notice and raising the SEPA threshold would not change that. 18.104.090 Notice of Application Procedure Notice of Application shall be provided as follows: 1. For all Type 2, 3, 4 and 5 decisions, and Type 1 decisions which require SEPA review, the Notice of Application shall be mailed by first class mail to the applicant and to departments and agencies with jurisdiction, except that a Notice of Application is not required in the case of a Code Interpretation pursuant to TMC 18.96.010 or a Sign Permit Denial pursuant to TMC Chapter 19.12. 2. For Type 1 decisions and Type 2 decisions which require SEPA review, the Notice of Application shall be provided by posting pursuant to TMC 18.104.110, provided that the Notice of Application for a Type 1 decision involving a single family residence need not be posted but shall be published one time in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. 3. For short plats of 5 through 9 lots and Type 3, 4 and 5 applications, the Notice of Application shall be posted pursuant to TMC 18.104.110 and mailed pursuant to pp p p P TMC 18.104.120. Notice requirements for secure community transition facilities shall be in accordance with RCW 71.09.315 as amended. Very few development proposals require a full environmental impact statement (EIS) to analyze impacts and develop mitigation measures. For the vast majority of development in Tukwila the City issues either a determination of non significance (DNS) or a mitigated determination of non significance (MDNS) after review of the SEPA checklist. The City is authorized under WAC 197 -11 -355 to make this determination early in the review process and combine the SEPA comment period with that of the underlying permit, saving about two weeks of processing time. PROPOSAL Raise the flexible thresholds for commercial/industrial and residential new construction as shown on the table above. Take advantage of the optional DNS process that allows for concurrent SEPA and project comment periods, see Attachment A for a draft ordinance. REQUESTED ACTION Send the PC recommended changes to the City Council for a final hearing and adoption of an ordinance. Attachment A Draft SEPA Ordinance NG Page 3 06/28/2007 2:40:00 PM Q: \CODEA ND \SEPAChanges \7- 9COW_SEPA.DOC DRAFT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 1331 AND 1344, AS CODIFIED AT TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 21.04, RAISING CERTAIN THRESHOLD REQUIREMENTS THAT INITIATE SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, ADOPTING THE OPTIONAL DETERMINATION OF NON SIGNIFICANT (DNS) PROCESS UNDER WAC 197 -11 -355; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, jurisdictions have flexibility in setting the thresholds that trigger SEPA review up to the maximum level allowed by the State; and WHEREAS, raising the flexible thresholds for new construction would streamline permit review for smaller projects; and WHEREAS, very few development proposals require a full environmental impact statement to analyze impacts and develop mitigation measures; and WHEREAS, adopting the optional DNS process allows for a more efficient review process; and WHEREAS, on May 24, 2007, the City of Tukwila Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments, and has recommended the adoption of certain environmental regulation changes; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed amendments July 16, 2007, after proper notice; and WHEREAS, after having received and studied staff analysis, the City Council believes that certain amendments to the City's development regulations are desirable; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance No. 1331 §10, as codified at TMC 21.04.080, is hereby amended to read as follows: 21.04.080 Categorical exemptions and threshold determinations Adoption by reference The City adopts the following sections of WAC Chapter 197 -11, as now existing or as may be amended hereafter, by reference as supplemented in this chapter: 197 -11 -300 Purpose of this part 197 -11 -305 Categorical exemptions 197 -11 -310 Threshold determination required 197 -11 -315 Environmental check list 197 -11 -330 Threshold determination process C:'Documents and Settings \A5 Users Desktop Kelly\MSDATA,Grdinances\SEPA Review.dot NG:ksn 7/5/ Page 1 of 2 197 -11 -335 Additional information 197 -11 -340 Determination of Non Significance (DNS) 197 -11 -350 Mitigated DNS 197 -11 -355 Optional DNS process 197 -11 -360 Determination of Significance (DS) /initiation of scoping 197 -11 -390 Effect of threshold determination Section 2. Ordinance Nos. 1331 §11 and 1344 §6, as codified at TMC 21.04.110, are hereby amended to read as follows: 21.04.110 Categorical exemptions Flexible thresholds A. The City establishes the following exempt levels for minor new construction based on local conditions: 1. For residential dwelling units in WAC 197 11-800 (1)(b)(i) up to four nine dwelling units. 2. For agricultural structures in WAC 197 -11 -800 (1)(b)(ii) up to 10,000 square feet. 3. For office, school, commercial, recreational, service or storage buildings in WAC 197 -11 -800 (1)(b)(iii), up to 4,800 12,000 square feet, and up to 20 40 parking spaces. 4. For parking lots in WAC 197 -11- 800 (1)(b)(iv), up to 40 parking spaces. 5. For landfills and excavations in WAC 197 -11 -800 (1)(b)(v), up to 500 cubic yards. B. The responsible official shall send copies of all adopted flexible thresholds to the Department of Ecology, headquarters office, Olympia, Washington. Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2007. ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED: Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk Filed with the City Clerk: APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Office of the City Attorney Ordinance Number: C ?Documents and SettingslAll Users Desk top \KellyiMSDATA Ordinances \SEPA Review.doc NG:Fsn 7/5/2607 Page 2 of 2 o y' City of Tukwila q o Community Affairs Parks Committee 4. rsoa COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PARKS COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes June 26, 2007- 5:00 p.m. PRESENT Councilmembers: Pam Linder, Chair; Pam Carter and Dennis Robertson Staff: Jack Pace, Nora Gierloff and Kimberly Matej Guest: Chuck Parrish CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Linder called the meeting to order at 4:57 p.m. I. PRESENTATIONS No presentations. II. BUSINESS AGENDA A. Sensitive Areas Ordinance The Sensitive Areas Ordinance (SAO) amendment is returning to the Community Affairs and Parks Committee since it was first heard on April 24, 2007. On April 24 the Committee suggested some minor language changes, and chose to forward it to the COW for discussion. The COW, in turn, chose to forward the amendment to the Planning Commission for review. After the Planning Commission held a public hearing, they recommended approval of the SAO amendment as written. With the exception of minor language changes, this is the same amendment that the Committee reviewed previously. In summary, the amendment addresses off -site mitigation and the amount of mitigation built into the value of a credit in a mitigation bank. The current ordinance, as written, does not address the issue of mitigation banks and is not straightforward on mitigation ratios. The proposed changes will allow the DCD Director to establish a ratio for mitigation acreage in comparison to wetland bank credits for off -site mitigation. The process will allow a certain number of mitigation bank credits to be required for impact at a specific mitigation bank in comparison to the impact made by development of the sensitive area in question. The Committee expressed their concern with mitigations occurring outside of the City when there are some sensitive areas within the City that will require funding in the upcoming years. Staff is aware of these concerns and understands the priority of on and off -site mitigation. Staff reminded the Committee that river areas cannot be utilized for wetland mitigation. The Committee is in favor of forwarding the SAO amendment to the COW for discussion. Additionally, the Committee feels that it would be in the best interest of the full Council for DCD to include a brief summary of the status of Type 2, 3 and 4 projects resulting in administrative decisions in their quarterly report. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JULY 9 COW. B. Code Amendment SEPA The amendment in question for SEPA was previously heard by the Committee on April 10, 2007. At that time, the Committee was not in consensus of the portion of the proposal which would A.....-- raise the residential construction from Tukwila's current threshold of four dwelling units to nine dwelling units. The proposal was sent to the COW for discussion. The COW chose to forward the amendment to the Planning Commission for review on the residential as well as commercial Communitv Affairs Parks Committee Minutes June 26. 2007 Paae 2 thresholds and an optional DNS process. After the Planning Commission held a public hearing, they recommended approval of the proposed amendment of increasing the residential construction threshold to nine dwelling units from four dwelling units; increasing the commercial/industrial threshold to 12,000 square feet and 40 parking spaces from 4,000 square feet and 20 parking spaces; and exercising the optional determination of non significance (DNS) process to run concurrent comment periods for the project and SEPA. Staff commented that when the City originally implemented SEPA, we did not yet have an SAO in place. The Committee supports the Planning Commission recommendation. UNANIIVIOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JULY 9 COW. C. Zoning Code Amendments Staff brought forth four proposed Zoning Code amendments. 1. Limitation on single family expansions with non conforming setbacks 2. Retaining wall setback changes 3. Administrative variance for single family lot size 4. Update to Permit Application Table at TMC 18.104.010 These amendments were originally introduced at the April 10, 2007, Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting. They were then forwarded to COW for discussion, and from there to the Planning Commission for a public hearing and subsequent recommendation. After a lengthy discussion, the Committee agreed to forward Amendments 1 and 4 to the COW for discussion, and they are in support of the Planning Commission's recommendations for those amendments. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL FOR AMENDMENTS 1 and 4. FORWARD TO JULY 9 COW. In regards to Amendment 2, Retaining Wall Setback Changes, Dennis expressed concern with the wording of number four of the setback waiver. His concern is that number four will nullify the parameters set forth in numbers one through three if the applicant can attribute their need for a retaining wall to fire access requirements. Dennis would like to draft a proposed wording change for number four that staff can submit for consideration along with the Planning Commission recommendation when the amendment moves forward to the COW for further discussion. FORWARD TO JULY 9 COW. The Committee is not in consensus with Amendment 3, Administrative Variance for Single Family Lot Size. Both Pam Linder and Pam Carter feel that the changes proposed by the amendment do not create provisions that would substantially affect the quality of life for Tukwila's single family home residents; and that the 500 square foot variance will allow for flexibility assisting interested property owners who are minimally under the threshold for subdivision. In contrast, Dennis shared his concern for property owners who bought in a particular location as a result of spatial housing and lot sizes. He does not support this amendment because he feels implementation of such variances for lot subdivisions has the potential to disturb the well -being of neighborhoods with the consideration that the majority of homeowners purchased their home because of the lot size layout and prefer for the lot sizes to be maintained as such. COMMITTEE IS NOT IN CONSENSUS. FORWARD TO JULY 9 COW. COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS �J 9 Initials ITEM No. O j +a �t 7 d Meeting Date Prepared by n 1 Mayor's review 1 Council review 1 Q e y ,u�; 05/14/07 I JP ell 1 07/09/07 I ]P I .4' 1 3 0 (c.)) isos I I I v 1TE M INFORMATION CAS NUMBER: 07-057 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: MAY 14, 2007 AGENDA ITEM TITLE SAO Mitigation Ratio for Wetland Banks CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other Mtg Date 07/9/07 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 07/16/07 Mtg Date Mtg Date 07/16/07 Mtg Date SPONSOR Council Mayor Adnl Svcs ®DCD El Finance El Fire Legal P &R Police PIS SPONSOR'S The proposal is to amend the Sensitive Areas Ordinance (SAO) to allow the Director to SUMMARY establish a mitigation ratio that meets the intent of the SAO for specific wetland mitigation banks. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DA 1'E: 4- 24 -07, 7/9/07 (CAP), 5/14/07 (COW), 5/24/07 (PC), 7/9/07 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMEN. Hold a public hearing on the ordinance CottE\HTrEE Forward to full Council for consideration COST =IMPAGT 1 FUNDSO U RCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0 $0 $0 Fund Source: N/A Comments: 1 =MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 5 -14 -07 1 Forward to Planning Commission for a recommendation 7 -9 -07 1 1 MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS_ 1 5 -14 -07 Information Memo dated 5/8/07 with Attachments Minutes from the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting of 4/24/07 7 -9 -07 Information Memo dated 6/28/07 with Attachments Minutes from the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting of 6/26/07 INFORMATION MEMO To: Mayor Mullet Committee of the Whole From: Jack Pace, Acting Director Department of Community Develop Is Date: June 28, 2007 Subject: Code Amendment Sensitive Areas Ordinance ISSUE Should the Sensitive Areas Ordinance (SAO) be amended to allow the DCD Director to establish a mitigation ratio on a case -by -case basis for off -site mitigation carried out at a wetland mitigation bank? BACKGROUND The CAP discussed this at their April 24 meeting. They had some suggested changes to the code language which have been incorporated into the proposal but did not have a consensus opted The COW discussed this at the May 14 meeting and while they p ted to forward the amendment on to the PC there were concerns about the use of mitigation sites outside of Tukwila and the degree of flexibility granted to the DCD Director's decision. The PC held a public hearing on May 24 and discussed the desirability of mitigation sites within Tukwila and the Director's special permission decision making process, though they ultimately recommended approval of the amendment as written. The CAP reviewed the issue on June 26 and opted to forward the amendment to the COW unchanged. DISCUSSION Only isolated Type 3 wetlands or wetlands in the path of an essential public facility may be filled and mitigated off -site under the City's Sensitive Area Ordinance (SAO). This off -site mitigation requires a Special Permission approval from the DCD Director, and may be inside or outside the city limits of Tukwila as long as the mitigation site is within the same river basin, see criteria at TMC 18.45.090 E listed in Attachment A. The current proposal would not change this process or the criteria that must be met. Tukwila's Urban Environmentalist has investigated the opportunities for off -site mitigation in Tukwila, including establishment of a wetland mitigation bank, and has found them to be limited. Staff's recommendation was to make appropriate City -owned properties available for individual mitigation projects that would be designed and implemented by the developer, see a CL Page 1 of 3 06/28/2007 8:57:00 AM Q:\2007 SAO Amendment \CAP Memo.doc summary of the "Off -Site Wetland Mitigation Program for Tukwila" report at Attachment B. The Council adopted this policy direction in Resolution 1608. However due to the limited area available for creation and enhancement these sites are unable to meet the mitigation needs of larger projects. Wetland mitigation banking as a tool for off setting unavoidable impacts to wetlands is increasingly becoming more important, and the City is starting to see proposals for off -site mitigation at banks. A wetland mitigation bank is the consolidation of small, fragmented wetland mitigation projects into a large contiguous site where creation, restoration and enhancement is carried out in advance of the impacts. Banks are established under a fouifal and rigorous permitting process that establishes how many wetland mitigation "credits" will be available for sale. The mitigation ratios established in the SAO apply to both on -site and off -site mitigation and are used to determine a mitigation area requirement when multiplied by the acreage of fill or impact due to the project. The SAO does not address transferring mitigation to a mitigation bank, which uses credits as opposed to acreage in detemuining the amount of mitigation needed. Determining the number of mitigation bank credits needed to meet the City's mitigation ratios is not straightforward. Credits in a mitigation bank are based on the net ecological benefit provided and are determined on the basis of Department of Ecology mitigation ratios, the kinds of mitigation carried out at the bank (wetland creation, restoration, and/or enhancement), the type (class) of wetland that has been created, rehabilitated or enhanced and the total acreage for each type of mitigation. The number of credits needed for mitigation is based on the type (classification) of the wetland being impacted. The amount of mitigation built into the value of a credit does not directly equate to Tukwila's SAO mitigation ratios, which are based on acreage impacted and do not distinguish between types of wetlands in applying the mitigation ratios. Mitigation ratios applied to projects that are carrying out wetland mitigation in conjunction with a development project are typically higher than those ratios in a mitigation bank, because they factor in the element of risk that the wetland mitigation might fail. In wetland mitigation banks, however, the theory is that the wetland will already be mitigated well in advance of any development proposal thus reducing the risk of mitigation failure (if the bank fails, credits cannot be released). The Springbrook mitigation bank established by the City of Renton and WSDOT was reviewed and approved by the State Department of Ecology, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Federal Highway Administration and underwent rigorous review for compliance with both State and Federal requirements for wetland and stream protection and restoration. This review process is required for the establishment of any mitigation bank. See Attachment C for the relationship between the acreage of mitigation, ratio applied and resulting credit value at the Springbrook Creek Bank in Renton. NG Page 2 of 3 06/28/2007 8:57 :00 AM Q:\CODEAMND\WetlandBank\SA07-9COW.DOC The City recently processed two land use applications submitted by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) seeking approval to transfer mitigation for impacts to wetlands along Hwy 518 and I -405 to the Springbrook Wetland Mitigation Bank, a mitigation bank area of over 125 acres located in Renton. The location of the highway construction on both Hwy 518 and I -405 and the sensitive areas made it difficult to fmd room to adequately mitigate for wetland impacts in the remaining right -of -way. In addition, the size of the remaining sensitive areas available in the right -of -way would limit the effectiveness of any mitigation implemented. Thus off -site mitigation made sense in these two cases. WSDOT proposed withdrawal of a certain number of credits from the bank as the proposed wetland mitigation. This issue will arise again when applications are submitted for the Strander Blvd. extension, which will disturb Type 1 wetlands. The City of Renton will be requesting permission to carry out wetland mitigation in the Springbrook Wetland Mitigation Bank. WSDOT will also likely want to use the bank for future highway construction in Tukwila. Unless our SAO is amended to permit a determination of the equivalency of a specific bank's credits to the mitigation area required per our SAO requirements we will not be able to ensure that the net ecological benefits at the mitigation bank compensate for the wetland impacts. The current proposal would not change the process or the criteria for approval of off -site mitigation. If permission is granted for off -site mitigation the applicant must identify a site capable of providing an equivalent ecological benefit to the filled wetlands. The argument for carrying out the mitigation at a Mitigation Bank is that mitigation is completed in advance of impacts and generally results in improved hydrologic, water quality and habitat functions in a consolidated location. Studies of wetland mitigation banks have shown this to be true as long as the mitigation bank is maintained and monitored. Staff recommends amending the SAO as identified in Attachment A to permit the DCD Director to establish a ratio of mitigation acreage to wetland bank credit for off -site mitigation proposed in wetland mitigation banks that have been approved by appropriate agencies. This would be a Type 2 decision, similar to most of the other discretionary approvals in the SAO. REOUESTED ACTION Send the PC endorsed changes to a final public hearing and adoption of the ordinance as written or amended. Attachment A Draft Ordinance Attachment B Summary of the "Off -Site Wetland Mitigation Program for Tukwila" Report Attachment C Springbrook Creek Mitigation Credit Table NG Page 3 of 3 06/28/2007 8:57:00 AM Q: \CODEAti ND \WetlandBank\SAO7- 9COW.DOC no A r- T AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2074, AS CODIFIED AT TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 18.45, TO CREATE A PROCESS FOR DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF WETLAND MITIGATION CREDITS REQUIRED FOR OFF -SITE MITIGATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City's Sensitive Areas Ordinance does not currently address a method for determining the number of wetland mitigation bank credits needed for a specific off -site mitigation project; and WHEREAS, on May 24, 2007, the City of Tukwila Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendments that would create a decision process and criteria for the determination of the number of wetland mitigation credits required for off -site mitigation, and has recommended the adoption of certain Zoning Code changes; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on these proposed amendments on July 16, 2007, after proper notice; and WHEREAS, after having received and studied staff analysis, the City Council believes these amendments to the City's sensitive area regulations are desirable; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance No. 2074 §1 (part), as codified at TMC 18.45.090, is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.45.090 Wetlands Uses, Alterations and Mitigation A. No use or development may occur in a Type 1, Type 2 or Type 3 wetland or its buffer except as specifically allowed by TMC Chapter 18.45. Any use or development allowed is subject to review and approval by the Director. Where required, a mitigation or enhancement plan must be developed and must comply with the standards of mitigation required in TMC Chapter 18.45. B. Alterations 1. Alterations to wetlands are discouraged and are limited to the minimum necessary for project feasibility. Requests for alterations must be accompanied by a mitigation plan, are subject to Director approval, and may be approved only if the following findings are made: a. The alteration will not adversely affect water quality; b. The alteration will not adversely affect fish, wildlife, or their habitat; c. The alteration will not have an adverse effect on drainage and /or storm water detention capabilities; d. The alteration will not lead to unstable earth conditions or create an erosion hazard or contribute to scouring actions; e. The alteration will not be materially detrimental to any other property; and f. The alteration will not have adverse effects on an other sensitive y ns e areas. 2. Alterations are not permitted to Type 1 wetlands unless specifically exempted under the provisions of TMC Chapter 18.45. 3. Alterations to Type 2 wetlands are prohibited except where the location or configuration of the wetland provides practical difficulties that can be resolved by modifying up to .10 (one tenth) of an acre of wetland. Mitigation for any alteration to a Type 2 wetland must be provided at a ratio of 1.5:1 for creation or restoration and 3:1 for enhancement and must be located contiguous to the altered wetland. 4. Isolated Type 3 wetlands may be altered or relocated only with the permission of the Director. A mitigation or enhancement plan must be developed and must comply with the standards of mitigation required in TMC Chapter 18.45. 5. Mitigation plans shall be completed for any proposals for dredging, filling, alterations and relocation of wetland habitat allowed in TMC Chapter 18.45. 6. Isolated wetlands formed on fill material in highly disturbed environmental conditions and assessed as having low overall wetland functions may be altered and/ or relocated under TMC Chapter 18.45. These wetlands may include artificial hydrology or wetlands unintentionally created as the result of construction activities. The determination that a wetland is isolated is made through the Type 2 permit process. A mitigation or enhancement plan must be developed and must comply with the standards of mitigation required in TMC Chapter 18.45. C. Mitigation Sequencing. Applicants shall demonstrate that reasonable efforts have been examined with the intent to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and wetland buffers. When an alteration to a wetland or its required buffer is proposed, such alteration shall be avoided, minimized or compensated for in the following order of preference: 1. Avoidance of wetland and wetland buffer impacts, whether by finding another site or changing the location of the proposed activity on -site. 2. Minimizing wetland and wetland buffer impacts by limiting the degree of impact on site. 3. Mitigation actions that require compensation by replacing, enhancing, or substitution shall occur in the following order of preference: a. restoring wetlands on upland sites that were formerly wetlands; b. enhancing significantly degraded wetlands; c. creating wetlands on disturbed upland sites such as those with vegetative cover consisting primarily of exotic introduced species or noxious weeds. D. Mitigation Plans. 1. The mitigation plan shall be developed as part of a sensitive area study by a specialist approved by the Director. Wetland and /or buffer alteration or relocation C:\Documents and Settings\Ali Users \Desktop\Kelly\MSDATA \Ordinances \Wetland Mitigation Credits.doc GL:ksn 7/5/2007 Page 2 of 5 may be allowed only when a mitigation plan clearly demonstrates that the changes would be an improvement of wetland and buffer quantitative and qualitative functions. The plan shall follow the performance standards of TMC Chapter 18.45 and show how water quality, wildlife and fish habitat, and general wetland quality would be improved. 2. In order to achieve the City's goal of no net loss of wetland functions and acreage, alteration of wetlands will require the applicant to provide a restoration or creation plan to compensate for the impacts to the wetland and will compensate at a ratio of 1.5 1. 3. Impacts to wetlands may be mitigated by enhancement of existing significantly degraded wetlands; however, in order to achieve the City's goal of no net loss of wetland functions and acreage, mitigation through enhancement must be compensated at a ratio of 3:1. Applicants proposing to enhance wetlands must produce a sensitive area study that identifies how enhancement will increase the functions of the degraded wetland and how this increase will adequately mitigate for the loss of wetland area and function at the impact site. An enhancement proposal must also show whether existing wetland functions will be reduced by the enhancement actions. 4. The DCD Director may approve, through a Type 2 decision, the transfer of mitigation to a wetland mitigation bank using the criteria in 4.a. through 4.d below. The Director must determine the number of wetland mitigation bank credits required to meet the mitigation ratios established in TMC Chapter 18.45. a. Off-site mitigation is proposed in a wetland mitigation bank that has been approved by all appropriate agencies, including the Department of Ecologv. Corps of Engineers, EPA or other regulatory agencies; and b. The applicant provides a iustification for the number of credits proposed; and c. The mitigation achieved through the number of credits required meets the intent of TMC Chapter 18.45; and d. The Director bases the decision on a written staff report, evaluating the equivalence of the lost wetland functions with the number of wetland credits required. E. Mitigation Location. 1. On -site mitigation shall be provided, except where the applicant can demonstrate that: a. On -site mitigation is not scientifically feasible due to problems with hydrology, soils, waves or other factors; or b. Mitigation is not practical due to potentially adverse impact from surrounding land uses; or c. Existing functional values created at the site of the proposed restoration are significantly greater than lost wetland functional values; or d. Established regional goals for flood storage, flood conveyance, habitat or other wetland functions have been established and strongly justify location of mitigation at another site. 2. Off -site mitigation shall occur within the same watershed where the wetland loss occurred. C:\Documents and Settings All Users \Desktop\f elly\MSDATA \Ordinances \Wetland Mitigation CmAits.doc GL:ksn 7/5/2007 Page 3 of 5 3. Mitigation sites located within the Tukwila city limits are preferred. However, the Director may approve mitigation sites outside the city upon finding that: a. Adequate measures have been taken to ensure the non development and long -term viability of the mitigation site; and b. Adequate coordination with the other affected local jurisdiction has occurred. 4. In selecting mitigation sites, applicants shall pursue siting in the following order of preference: a. Upland sites that were formerly wetlands; b. Idled upland sites generally having bare ground or vegetative cover consisting primarily of exotic introduced species, weeds or emergent vegetation; c. Other disturbed upland; d. Existing degraded wetland. F. Mitigation Standards. The scope and content of a mitigation plan shall be decided on a case -by -case basis. As the impacts to the sensitive area increase, the mitigation measures to offset these impacts will increase in number and complexity. The components of a complete wetlands mitigation plan are as follows: 1. Baseline information of quantitative data collection or a review and synthesis of existing data for both the project impact zone and the proposed mitigation site. 2. Environmental goals and objectives that describe the purposes of the mitigation measures. This should include a description of site selection criteria, identification of target evaluation species, and resource functions. 3. Performance standards of the specific criteria for fulfilling environmental goals, and for beginning remedial action or contingency measures. They may include water quality standards, species richness and diversity targets, habitat diversity indices, or other ecological, geological or hydrological criteria. 4. A detailed construction plan of the written specifications and descriptions of mitigation techniques. This plan should include the proposed construction sequence and construction management, and be accompanied by detailed site diagrams and blueprints that are an integral requirement of any development proposal. 5. Monitoring and /or evaluation program that outlines the approach for assessing a completed project. An outline shall be included that spells out how the monitoring data will be evaluated by agencies that are tracking the mitigation project's progress. 6. Contingency plan identifying potential courses of action and any corrective measures to be taken when monitoring or evaluation indicates project performance standards have not been met. 7. Performance security or other assurance devices as described in TMC 18.45.210. G. Mitigation Timing. Mitigation projects shall be completed prior to activities that will permanently disturb wetlands and either prior to or immediately after activities that will temporarily disturb wetlands. Construction of mitigation projects shall be timed to reduce impacts to existing wildlife, flora and water quality, and shall be completed prior to use or occupancy of the activity or development. The Director may C /Documents and SettingsWl Users\ Desk top \Kell}'MSDATA'Ordinances \Wetland Mitigation Credits.doc GL:ksn 7/5/2007 Page 4 of 5 allow activities that permanently disturb wetlands prior to implementation of the mitigation plan under the following circumstances: 1. To allow planting or re- vegetation to occur during optimal weather conditions; 2. To avoid disturbance during critical wildlife periods; or 3. To account for unique site constraints that dictate construction timing or phasing. H. Permitted Uses Subject to Exception Approval. Other uses may be permitted upon receiving a reasonable use exception pursuant to TMC 18.45.180. A use permitted through a reasonable use exception shall conform to the procedures of TMC Chapter 18.45 and be consistent with the underlying zoning. Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2007. ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED: Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk Filed with the City Clerk: APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Office of the City Attorney Ordinance Number: C :\Documents and Settinns\All Users\Desktop lielly\MSDATA \Ordinances \Wetland Mitigation Credits.doc GL:ksn 7!512.007 Page 5 of 5 STAFF REPORT OFF-SITE W M FOR TUKWILA WETLAND MITIGATION PROGRAM N --"..-_:tivt,- ...-4 Jr -T N. 1, -T 7 --N- -P e4 :i' 0 4 L 4 3 i---7r-1 -4-- -1 f 4-- re _1 EIrtiX 4- 0 r A ...I it V_ c.‘ N_ v. i 7 I '''.4.41■2-461._.-v. i- "I‘ il .Yr -"k 'si-f-!` -7- i .4. c k--,.; g r 4 7 A...No 1 Ay --44 k V „Fg ‘:-1- g 1F- V4---. zi ,g- Ng 1 -,_p• _„„r .i._ 4 .1„,-, 1. i A _„.....-1-0 "i.J \s% April 17, 2006 Attachment B EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction In an effort to address the increasing pressure for development in Tukwila on properties that have wetlands, staff is proposing a program for off -site wetland mitigation when on- site alternatives are not adequate. The program has been conceived as a way to help facilitate development, particularly for small developers, while at the same time providing an innovative mechanism for mitigating wetland impacts. It could be beneficial environmentally, by directing mitigation for many small wetland losses to larger or more highly functioning sites. This report summarizes the key points of a study carried out by staff, with the support of a wetland consultant. It also establishes program objectives and components, presents conceptual mitigation plans for selected sites on city -owned properties, and identifies the ess for implementing the program. steps necessary p g ram. p g P Regulatory and Planning Context As part of the study, staff analyzed the regulatory and planning context related to wetland mitigation. Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC18.45) establishes mitigation sequencing that first requires avoidance of wetland impacts, then minimization of impacts, and finally compensation through mitigation. It allows for off -site mitigation under certain circumstances. The proposed program respects the intent of the ordinance. The US Army Corps of Engineers and Department of Ecology also regulate wetland impacts, but the Corps does not have jurisdiction over isolated wetlands (those not "connected" hydrologically to waters of the United States). The proposed program would be limited, at least initially, to wetlands not regulated by the Corps. Tukwila's commitment to implementing the WRIA 9 Salmon Enhancement Plan is also an important consideration when thinking about off -site wetland mitigation, as some wetland mitigation projects could be directed to also enhancing salmon habitat, thus achieving some of the objectives of the plan. Alternative Wetland Mitigation Management Approaches Staff evaluated three alternative wetland mitigation management instruments that could be used to implement the program: 1) Alternative 1: wetland banking; 2) Alternative 2: consolidated mitigation at designated sites; and 3) Alternative 3: in -lieu fee program S. Whiting i 04/24/2006 12:11:00 PM Q: TUK2 \VOL3\HOME\SANDRA \WETLAND MITIGATION BANKING POLICIES \STAFF REPORT \FINAL \WETLAND MITIGATION REPORT Wetland banking (Alternative 1) would require the City to implement mitigation up front at a designated site and later "sell" credits to developers. that need to do off -site wetland mitigation. This approach would require a complicated and lengthy authorization process with the Corps of Engineers and the Department of Ecology. Consolidated mitigation (Alternative 2) would be an informal program that directs off site mitigation to designated sites (both City -owned and privately -owned properties), but the mitigation would be carried out by the developer under City supervision. An in -lieu fee program (Alternative 3) would establish fees to be charged to developers in -lieu of them carrying out wetland mitigation. The City would then use the fees to implement a mitigation plan and to conduct ongoing monitoring and maintenance. The following table summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Instrument Advantages Disadvantages 1 Comments Wetland Consolidates mitigation for Difficult and lengthy No suitable city- Mitigation Bank greater environmental benefit process for set -up owned sites available Mitigation in advance, ensures City (or other sponsor) success, no lag between would have to fund 1 impact and mitigation mitigation up -front Risk of not being able to sell credits /recoup investment Consolidated Consolidates mitigation for Potential adverse Not as feasible for mitigation at greater environmental benefit environmental impacts to Macadam or Green designated sites some existing wetlands due River sites unless a (city and Applicants would prepare and to repeated interventions proposed project privately -owned carry out detailed mitigation over time needed a medium to sites) plans under City oversight large site for mitigation. Minimal lag time between impact and mitigation Actual availability over time of privately Potential for coordinating with owned sites is WRIA 9 projects uncertain In -lieu fee Could consolidate mitigation Possible long period Modification to TMC program at for greater environmental between when impact 18.45 needed designated sites benefit occurs and mitigation takes place Sufficient staff needed Mitigation would be entirely to implement under City control Risk of not receiving (contracting, enough fees to carry out a construction oversight, Would allow for fees to be full mitigation or long -term monitoring, long -term contributed towards WRIA 9 maintenance maintenance) projects with wetland components Risk of cost overruns that would have to be borne by City S. Whiting ii 04/24/2006 12:11:00 PM Q: TUK2 \VOL3\HOME\SANDRA \WETLAND MITIGATION BANKING POLICIES\STAFF REPORT\FINAL \WETLAND MITIGATION REPORT Identification of Potential Wetland Mitigation Sites on City -Owned Land Staff mapped all City -owned sites and overlaid this infomIation on the Sensitive Areas Map to determine possible locations suitable for wetland creation or enhancement. Criteria were applied for evaluating the sites and Public Works, the Fire Department, and the Parks and Recreation Department were consulted in the process to ensure that there were no conflicts with future proposed uses of the sites. The results of the analysis of available sites for wetland mitigation indicate that: feasible sites do not exist for every sub -basin where there is potential demand; it will not be possible to achieve "in- kind" mitigation in every case (i.e. to match wetland classifications between the wetlands impacted and the wetland sites to be used for mitigation); and Tukwila suffers from a shortage of suitable areas on City -owned land (and in general) and there are no large amounts of contiguous acreage that would be suitable as a large bank or mitigation site. As a result of this effort, three sites were initially identified for preparation of conceptual mitigation plans: 1) Macadam wetlands, located on the east side of Macadam Road and just south of S. 144 (mostly south of the proposed Winter Garden). A small amount of wetland creation and considerable wetland enhancement would be possible at this site and would also complement the Winter Garden project. Buffers would not be extended any further on to private property. 2) Fire Station 53 (undeveloped portion), located 4202 S. 115 behind the fire station. This site presents opportunities for wetland enhancement and a small amount of creation, without causing buffers to be expanded. 3) A site on the Green River, located adjacent to and north of the Riverview Plaza development, and across the river from the Best Western Hotel. The site has an upper and lower bicycle trail managed by the Parks Department. The lower trail periodically floods during high water. The site presents an opportunity for wetland creation along the river (while leaving the upper trail in place) that would also provide off channel salmon habitat. An access point for boat launching could also be incorporated into the project. Additional city -owned sites, such as Tukwila Pond, could be candidates for off -site mitigation in the future. S. Whiting iii 04/24/2006 12:11:00 PM Q: TUK2 \VOL3\HOME\SANDRA \WETLAND MITIGATION BANKING POLICIES\STAFF REPORT\FINAL \WETLAND MITIGATION REPORT Potential Wetland Mitigation Sites on Private Property Off -site wetland mitigation on private properties is allowed under the Sensitive Areas Ordinance and is already an established practice in Tukwila. However, with the idea of helping to facilitate off -site mitigation, especially for small developments, staff researched the availability of privately -owned sites in Tukwila. The idea would be to serve as a matchmaker between developers needing mitigation sites and property owners interested in making their sites available for mitigation. Negotiations regarding financial compensation and easements would be between the property owner and the developer. 1 We identified potential wetland mitigation sites on privately -owned properties using the same process and criteria that were used for identifying city -owned sites and began contacting the property owners to see if they would be interested in the program. Staff has been unable to reach all of the property owners as of this writing, but some interest by has been expressed those reached. Recommended Approach Staff recommends the consolidated mitigation approach, using designated City or privately -owned properties, but requiring that the developer be responsible for preparation and implementation of detailed mitigation plans under the City's oversight. The consolidated mitigation approach could work well at Fire Station 53, where there are separate, well- defined small sections of the site that could be mitigated by different applicants at different times. The Macadam site would best accommodate one or two large projects to avoid repeated interventions into the wetland. Smaller projects are not out of the question, but this would require very careful planning and coordination to accommodate small projects. The Green River site would be better suited to large projects (such as a WSDOT or Sound Transit project), where a one -time intervention would be preferable due to costs and to minimize negative impacts. The consolidated approach could lend itself to supporting WRIA 9 projects in some circumstances, where a WRIA 9 project is underway or close to starting up, and an applicant could provide part of the restoration as mitigation (such as purchasing plants, planting, or some other discrete task related to the restoration project). In order to implement the proposed plan staff is seeking CAP Committee approval of program and a Council resolution approving the use of City properties for wetland mitigation under the program and establishing criteria for determining fees on a case -by- case basis. S. Whiting iv 04/24/2006 12:11:00 PM Q: TUK2 \VOL3\HOME\SA 4DRA \WETLAND MITIGATION BANKING POLICIES\STAFF REPORT \FINAL \WETLAND MITIGATION REPORT FINAL Springbrook Creek Wetland and Habitat Mitigation Bank Instrument 4.0 BANK OPERATION 4.1 CREDIT DETERMINATION Credits are the "currency" of a mitigation bank. The value of credits that a mitigation bank generates equals its net ecological benefit. The 129.37 -acre Springbrook Bank includes 116.82 acres that qualify for bank credit. The remaining 12.55 non credit acres have been designated for protection setback and the Trail Zone to minimize disturbances I from adjacent roads, development, and the trail through Unit A. Units D and E each have an existing 20 -foot utility easement inside the parcel boundary that will not generate mitigation credit (see Figures 2 -4 and 2 -3). The 45.12 credits expected to be generated at Springbrook Bank represents the number of acres of impacts to Category II wetlands (Hruby 2004) for which the bank could be used as compensation (Table 4 -1). These mitigation credits will become available as performance standards and other measures are achieved (see Tables 3 -1 through 3 -4 and Table 4 -3). The precise number of credits actually generated by the Springbrook Bank cannot be determined until the project is constructed and the success of restoration and enhancement activities is assessed by the BOC. The final number of credits will be determined by the BOC and will be based on achievement of the performance standards. Table 4 -1. Credit Potential Mitigation Treatment Acreage Ratios* I Mitigation Credits** I Unit A Unit B Unit C I Unit D Unit E Total Wetland Re- Establishment I 17.79 I 1:1 I 0.05 0.12 9.27 I 8.35 I 17.79 Wetland Rehabilitation 52.14 3:1 6.64 10.39 0.35 17.38 I Wetland Enhancement Type 1 I 4.69 4:1 1.17 1.17 Wetland Enhancement Type I I 2.63 I 5:1 0.53 0.53 Forested Wetland Enhancement 25.22 5:1 4.65 0.40 I 5.05 Riparian Upland Enhancement 6.56 I 4:1 0.16 0.37 1.11 1.64 I Upland Habitat Enhancement 7.80 5:1 1.56 1.56 Buffer Enhancement 9.89 Trail Zone I 2.66 I Totals I 129.37 6.85 10.88 17.00 0.93 9.46 45.12 The ratio of acreage to credits is the number of credits established per acre of mitigation activity in first column. The number of mitigation credits that Springbrook Bank will generate for each mitigation treatment. Each credit can compensate for the loss of a typical acre of Category II wetland. 4.2 APPROVING PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR CREDIT RELEASE Springbrook Bank is expected to generate 45.12 credits that will be eligible for release as the associated performance standards are met and approved by the BOC (Tables 3 -1 through 3 -4), with the exception that no credits may be released until a BOC- approved Memorandum of Agreement and Instrument are signed by the Sponsors, Ecology, and the Corps, and until a BOC- approved conservation easement is placed on the property title Chapter 4 i Attachment C Bank Operation <o f V:z'; City of Tukwila i a=� 4 .,�I, o 0t w,` Community Affairs Parks Committee dl► 1908 r COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PARKS COMIVIITTEE Meeting Minutes June 26, 2007 5:00 p.m. PRESENT Councilmembers: Pam Linder, Chair; Pam Carter and Dennis Robertson Staff Jack Pace, Nora Gierloff and Kimberly Matej Guest: Chuck Parrish CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Linder called the meeting to order at 4:57 p.m. L PRESENTATIONS No presentations. II. BUSINESS AGENDA A. Sensitive Areas Ordinance The Sensitive Areas Ordinance (SAO) amendment is returning to the Community Affairs and Parks Committee since it was first heard on April 24, 2007. On April 24 the Committee suggested some minor language changes, and chose to forward it to the COW for discussion. The 4 COW, in turn, chose to forward the amendment to the Planning Commission for review. After the Planning Commission held a public hearing, they recommended approval of the SAO amendment as written. With the exception of minor language changes, this is the same amendment that the Committee reviewed previously. In summary, the amendment addresses off -site mitigation and the amount of mitigation built into the value of a credit in a mitigation bank. The current ordinance, as written, does not address the issue of mitigation banks and is not straightforward on mitigation ratios. The proposed changes will allow the DCD Director to establish a ratio for mitigation acreage in comparison to wetland bank credits for off -site mitigation. The process will allow a certain number of mitigation bank credits to be required for impact at a specific mitigation bank in comparison to the impact made by development of the sensitive area in question. The Committee expressed their concern with mitigations occurring outside of the City when there are some sensitive areas within the City that will require funding in the upcoming years. Staff is aware of these concerns and understands the priority of on and off -site mitigation. Staff reminded the Committee that river areas cannot be utilized for wetland mitigation. The Committee is in favor of forwarding the SAO amendment to the COW for discussion. Additionally, the Committee feels that it would be in the best interest of the full Council for DCD to include a brief summary of the status of Type 2, 3 and 4 projects resulting in administrative decisions in their quarterly report. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JULY 9 COW. B. Code Amendment SEPA The amendment in question for SEPA was previously heard by the Committee on April 10, 2007. At that time, the Committee was not in consensus of the portion of the proposal which would raise the residential construction from Tukwila's current threshold of four dwelling units to nine dwelling units. The proposal was sent to the COW for discussion. The COW chose to forward the amendment to the Planning Commission for review on the residential as well as commercial COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS =4./ ip y Initials ITEM No, 1j ;AV 1 Meeting Date Prepan1 Mayor's review cluncil review `o 07/09/07 1 JP 'C'k A I /ITV d (3 1908 I r f -TEM INFORMATIO=N CAS NUMBER: L t)-{- 7 i O 0 1 ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: JULY 9, 2007 AGENDA ITEM TITLE Zoning Code amendments addressing expansion into non conforming setbacks, retaining wall setbacks, administrative lot area variance in LDR and housekeeping. (3 ORD NcEs CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other Mtg Date 7/9/07 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 07/16/07 Mtg Date Mtg Date 07/16/07 Mtg Date 'SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&2R Police PW SPONSOR'S Staff has grouped four proposed amendments to the Zoning Code together for SUMMARY consideration: 1) Limitation on single family expansions within non conforming setbacks; 2) Retaining wall setback changes; 3) Administrative variance for single family lot size; and 4) Update to Permit Application Table at TMC 18.104.010. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DALE: 4/10/07, 6/26/07 (CAP), 5/24/07 (PC) RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Hold a public hearing on the draft ordinances COMMITTEE Forward to COW COST IM PACT PFUND= SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED S So $0 Fund Source: N/A Comments: MTG. DATE I RECORD OF_COUNCIL ACTION 7 -9 -07 1 I I I MTG. DATE -ATTACHMENTS 7 -9 -07 1 Information Memo dated 6/28/07 with Attachments 1 1 Minutes from the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting of 6/26/07 1 I I I INFORMATIONMEM O RAND UM TO: Mayor Mullet Committee of the Whole FROM: Jack Pace, Acting DCD Direc DATE: June 28, 2007 SUBJECT: Zoning Code Amendments BACKGROUND Staff has grouped four proposed amendments to the Zoning Code together for consideration: 1) Limitation on single family expansions within non conforming setbacks; 2) Retaining wall setback changes; 3) Administrative variance for single family lot size; and 4) Update to Permit Application Table at TMC 18.104.010. Staff presented these issues with various options to the Community Affairs and Parks (CAP) Committee on April 10, 2007. The Committee discussed each item and chose to forward them to the Planning Commission for a hearing and recommendation. The PC made only minor changes and their recommendations are reflected in the strikeout/underline language listed in the attached draft ordinances. The CAP reviewed the issues again on June 26 and recommended forwarding all items to the July 9 meeting. Councilmember Robinson suggested some revised language for item 2, it is listed below. There was not consensus among the Committee on item 3. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS A. Limitation on Additions to Homes that Do Not meet Setbacks TMC 18.70.050 (6) states "single family structures in single or multiple family zone districts, which have legally non conforming building setbacks, shall be allowed to expand along the existing building line(s) if the existing distance from the nearest point of the structure to the property line is not reduced." This provision has been used in ways that significantly increase the area of non conformity and impact upon the neighboring property. The PC recommendation is to allow the structure to be expanded into the setback along the existing building line on the ground floor so long as the existing distance to the property line is not reduced and the square footage of the expansion into the setback does not exceed 50% of the square footage of the current intrusion, see Attachment A for the draft ordinance. Q: \CODEAMND\2007Amend7- 9COW.DOC Page 1 B. Retaining Wall Setbacks There are several different standards for whether retaining walls or rockeries can be located in required setbacks which leads to confusion and in some cases unusable yards. The building code allows most rockeries and retaining walls up to four feet high without a permit, which many people assume is the trigger for meeting setbacks. While the intent may have been to prevent a neighbor from having to look at a tall retaining wall on the property line it sometimes has the effect of creating a yard that is unmaintained and unusable to the property owner because of the grade separation. These rules do not provide for the situations where a retaining wall is perpendicular to a property line across two or more lots or alongside a driveway when the garage is built into the basement of a house on a hillside. Rockeries are rarely allowed to retain more than four feet of earth so their height is less of an issue. The PC recommendation is that retaining walls and rockeries with up to 4 feet of exposed face be allowed in yards to match building code requirements. This could be increased in special circumstances if the property in question is on the lower side of the retaining wall, if the wall benefits the lots on both sides of the property line or if the wall is needed due to R -O -W improvements, see Attachment B for a draft ordinance. The alternate language suggested for item 4 is shown in italics below: 18.50.XXX Retaining Wall Setback Waiver Retaining walls with an exposed height greater than four feet may be allowed in required front, side or rear yard setbacks under the following circumstances: 1. When the applicant's property is on the lower side of the retaining wall and it is not visible from adjacent properties or is screened by landscaping, or 2. When a wall built on a property line or perpendicular to it benefits the lots on both sides and the owners of both properties agree to jointly maintain the wall, or expansion improvements, When a wall in a front yard is required due to roadway p ansion or i p rovements or 4. When a wall or walls are needed to create a vehicular access road that meets Fire Department slope requirements and the exposed face either has a decorative /textured treatment or is screened with landscaping. OR- 4. When a wall or walls are needed to create a vehicular access road to meet Fire Department slope requirements and the exposed face is; (a) not visible from adjacent properties, or (b) screened by landscaping, or (c) owners of both properties agree to the wall or walls." C. Administrative Variance for Lot Size The minimum lot size in Low Density Residential, Tukwila's single family zone, is 6,500 sf. There are areas of the City that were platted prior to current zoning regulations with different lot patterns such as 3,000 sf lots. These substandard lots are no longer considered individual Q:\CODEAMV ID\2007Amend7- 9COW.DOC Page 2 building sites since the passage of Ordinance 2097. This means that a property owner might have to aggregate five or more lots totaling 15,000 sf in order to create two building sites as opposed to the 13,000 sf required by code. Another situation is where an owner wishes to subdivide a lot over 13,000 sf but also wants to retain an existing home that is sited near the middle of the lot so that a new lot cannot be created that meets both setbacks from the existing house and the minimum lot size. There was concern expressed at the CAP meeting about the effect that this might have in allowing for short plats in areas of the City with 12 to 13,000 sf lots. See Attachment C for a map of the approximately 160 lots in the City with area in this range. There may be other factors that would prevent these lots from being subdivided such as location of the existing house, presence of sensitive areas (streams, slopes or wetlands), lack of sanitary sewers or disinterest by the current owner in short platting. The PC recommends creation of an administrative variance to the DCD Director for reductions in lot size of up to 500sf per lot for up to two lots to streamline the process for lots that are just under the threshold for subdivision or where there is an existing house that prevents the lots from being divided equally, see Attachment D for the draft ordinance. Requests for greater reductions through a variance would still require a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. D. Permit Processing Housekeeping There are a few decisions called out in the body of the Zoning Code that are not listed in the table at TMC 18.104.010 Classification of Project Permit Applications. In addition the proposed changes above, if adopted, would add a new decision to the code. For clarity all of the types of decisions should be listed along with the decision maker and appeal body, see Attachment C for the draft ordinance. REOUESTED ACTION Send the PC endorsed changes to a fmal public hearing and adoption of the ordinances as written or amended. Attachment A Draft Non conforming Single Family Expansion Ordinance Attachment B Draft Retaining Wall Ordinance Attachment C Map of Lot Sizes between 12,000 and 13,000 sf Attachment D Draft Administrative Lot Area Variance Ordinance Q: \CODEAMNDL007Amend7- 9COW.DOC Page 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 1819 AND 2077, AS CODIFIED AT CHAPTER 18.70 OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE, TO RESTRICT EXPANSION OF HOUSES INTO NON CONFORMING SETBACKS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, limiting the expansion of single family structures that have legally non- conforming building setbacks will reduce the impact upon neighboring properties; and WHEREAS, on May 24, 2007, the City of Tukwila PIanning Commission held a public hearing on proposed amendments that address non conforming residential setbacks, and has recommended the adoption of certain Zoning Code changes; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on these proposed amendments July 16, 2007, after proper notice; and WHEREAS, after having received and studied staff analysis, the City Council believes that certain amendments to the City's development regulations are desirable; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance Nos. 1819 §1 (part) and 2077 §1, as codified at TMC 18.70.050, are hereby amended to read as follows: 18.70.050 Nonconforming Structures Where a lawful structure exists at the effective date of adoption of this title that could not be built under the terms of this title by reason of restrictions on area, lot coverage, height, yards or other characteristics of the structure, it may be continued so long as the structure remains otherwise lawful subject to the following provisions: 1. No such structure may be enlarged or altered in such a way that increases its degree of nonconformity. Ordinary maintenance of a nonconforming structure is permitted, pursuant to TMC 18.70.060, including but not limited to painting, roof repair and replacement, plumbing, wiring, mechanical equipment repair /replacement and weatherization These and other alterations, additions or enlargements may be allowed as long as the work done does not extend further into any required yard or violate any other portion of this title. Complete plans shall be required of all work contemplated under this section. 2. Should such structure be destroyed by any means to an extent of more than 50% of its replacement cost at time of destruction, in the judgment of the City's Building Official, it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with provisions of this title, except that in the LDR zone, structures that are nonconforming in regard to yard setbacks or sensitive area buffers, but were in conformance at the time of construction may be reconstructed to their original dimensions and location on the lot. C5Documents and Salinas All Users\Desktop Kelly1MSDATA .OrdinancesWon- conforming Setbacks.don NO:ksn 7/5/2007 Page 1 of 3 rr acl„nc A 3. Should such structure be moved for any reason or any distance whatsoever, it shall thereafter conform to the regulations for the zone in which it is located after it is moved. 4. When a nonconforming structure, or structure and premises in combination, is vacated or abandoned for 24 consecutive months, the structure, or structure and premises in combination, shall thereafter be required to be in conformance with the regulations of the zone in which it is located. Upon request of the owner, the City Council may grant an extension of time beyond the 24 consecutive months. 5. Residential structures and uses located in any single family or multiple- family residential zoning district and in existence at the time of adoption of this title shall not be deemed nonconforming in terms of bulk, use, or density provisions of this title. Such buildings may be rebuilt after a fire or other natural disaster to their original dimensions and bulk, but may not be changed except as provided in the non- conforming uses section of this chapter. 6. Single family structures in single- or multiple family residential zone districts, which have legally nonconforming building setbacks, shall be allowed to expand the ground floor only along the existing building line(s), so long as the existing distance from the nearest point of the structure to the property line is not reduced, and the souare footage of new intrusion into the setback does not exceed 50% of the souare footage of the current intrusion. 7. In wetlands, watercourses and their buffers, existing structures that do not meet the requirements of the Sensitive Areas Overlay District chapter of this title may be remodeled, reconstructed or replaced, provided that: a. The new construction does not further intrude into or adversely impact an undeveloped sensitive area or the required buffer; b. The new construction does not threaten the public health, safety or welfare; and c. The structure otherwise meets the requirements of this chapter. 8. In areas of potential geologic instability, coal mine hazard areas, and buffers, as defined in the Sensitive Areas Overlay District chapter of this title, existing structures may be remodeled, reconstructed or replaced, provided that: a. The new construction is subject to the geotechnical report requirements and standards of Section 18.45.080E and 080F; b. The new construction does not threaten the public health, safety or welfare; c. The new construction does not increase the potential for soil erosion or result in unacceptable risk or damage to existing or potential development or to neighboring properties; and d. The structure otherwise meets the requirements of this chapter. 9. A nonconforming use, within a nonconforming structure, shall not be allowed to expand into any other portion of the nonconforming structure. Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. C1Documents and Settings\A1I UserslDesktop \Kelly\MSDATA \Ordinances'Non- conforming Setbacks.doc NG:ksn 7/5/2007 Page 2 of 3 Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2007. A Tl'EST/ AUTHENTICA IED: Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk Filed with the City Clerk: APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Office of the City Attorney Ordinance Number: C\Documents and Senna:51 I] Users' Desktop \Kell}WSDATA \OrdinancesWon-conforming Setbacls.doc NG:ksn 7/52007 Page 3 of 3 ET AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1758, AS CODIFIED AT TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTERS 18.06 AND 18.50, TO ALLOW RETAINING WALLS UP TO FOUR FEET HIGH IN SETBACKS, AND ALLOW RETAINING WALLS OVER FOUR FEET HIGH IN SETBACKS UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, several different standards exist for determining whether retaining walls can be located in required setbacks, which leads to confusion and in some cases unusable yards; and WHEREAS, allowing retaining walls and rockeries with up to- four feet of exposed face in setbacks would align zoning and building code requirements; and WHEREAS, allowing retaining walls higher than four feet in setbacks may be appropriate in certain circumstances; and WHEREAS, on May 24, 2007, the City of Tukwila Planning Commission held a public hearing on proposed amendments addressing the retaining wall issue and has recommended the adoption of certain Zoning Code changes; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on these proposed amendments July 16, 2007, after proper notice; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after having received and studied staff analysis and comments from members of the public, believes that certain amendments to the City's development regulations are desirable; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance 1758 §1 (part), as codified at TMC 18.06.800, is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.06.800 Structure "Structure" means a combination of materials constructed and erected permanently on the ground or attached to something having a permanent location on the ground, but excluding all forms of vehicles even though immobilized. Not included are residential fences uu to six feet in height. retaining walls or rockeries with uu to four feet of exposed face. and similar improvements of minor character. Section 2. TIvMC Chapter 18.50, "Supplemental Development Standards," is hereby amended to add the following section: C:'Documents and Setnn0All UserssDesl top` Kell }AMSDATA',Ordinances'Retaining Vialls.doc GL:ksn 7/5/2007 Page 1 of 2 J���C J J� TMC 18.50.150 Retaining Wall Setback Waiver Retaining walls with an exposed height greater than four feet may be allowed in required front, side or rear yard setbacks under the following circumstances: 1. When the applicant's property is on the lower side of the retaining wall and it is not visible from adjacent properties or is screened by landscaping; or 2. When a wall built on a property line or perpendicular to it benefits the lots on both sides and the owners of both properties agree to jointly maintain the wall; or 3. When a wall in a front yard is reauired due to roadway expansion or improvements; or 4. When a wall or walls are needed to create a vehicular access road that meets Fire Department slope requirements, and the exposed face either has a decorative /textured treatment or is screened with landscaping. Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2007. ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED: Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk Filed with the City Clerk: APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Office of the City Attorney Ordinance Number: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\ Desktop\ Kelly \MSDATA \Ordinances\Retaining \Valts.doc GL:ksn 7/5/2007 Page 2 of 2 S .La FCh S i r r k c ren e st 7n r 1`a6th Sti E i 3 i z -4 1- Tilt.,_ x r; y t 1 i� 1U 7,t Sk �r 0 2 ,c f_; t 5` F sr .CC ti it 5 t3an s 4 'ra r t 42 -3 E�3C.V d ry Ab s_ f t 4!r„ s L-4.-,1-: m ich k} 4t�Y mo t'- o it i 1 y s 4 F 11 5[ e 118kh'S' tit 9 -6 r ,Y Sam a h St t etk v f l Ili -i 5i21t!PC 3 t C Ns„---__,--,,,„_,,,,,,,,,, K add 5 a r•. w p-- *Ei 7 2 '-6ChSt -d? fix O -6:;: e: +wry r i- 9t_ Y i In S ;77[h St_ 4 ;z rrt 7515 1 e11.1.-f ."P t �9 Fp s e t- i�9ih Pl S �r� '3 .Y .c P met n�so n?t a Q1 `3 °re�,f �-r ss a -.r te w e ms s_ cur 5 ti t r I 3 Fl 3 t 9 SP ft'.n %r 7 h L rt� F tr [h ,t t i rh9 Y G °a 1. 4_13. a 5' t?. fi r v r i-'s f Q1.1.' m {1i1sF`� s- a' s f f S1�t2dd 5 leg, g e s` q 4 71- k r r=-•- r 1 ,1 .11 A�- tF S ty x rnit. is 4, 1A -i t -le- Da t�dal A 'Y k q to -b r e_ f i t e o ,t t s i s 4 Ei sr 2 t 1 8� r .1` 3- T t u i 513 t sa 1-1': fit -t---.. J Y fi r =-s -a 3 t- t i g 23 ,1-_ s c.,_-_--_ 'r` -tea ".7£ At r s I 1 t G Sl .11N 15- iy'. 'S .}II --L =s issy z 0. k►v l la Pkvry r hlo Er �frg Dr o t ice/ id 'F m -s e r L` t trerdet Bldd r S t t i s t sett- T t 3- I- i! T.._ g rc b F1 1-F F E y r_ f t 3 °,--0.„5-'---f,, I'70kh S i u- e-;,..,,' P. 4 ?11tk14.�tlt r 72eid 5 te z LDR Lots 12 to 13,000 s 0.6mi t,; CityGIS N X sao Copyright d 2006 All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is the propri property of the contributor supplied under license and may not be approved except as licensed by Digital Map Products. Attachment C C AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 2119 AND 2135, AND CHAPTERS 18.50 AND 18.104 OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE, TO PROVIDE AN ADMINISTRATIVE LOT AREA VARIANCE IN THE LDR ZONE THAT WOULD BE PROCESSED AS A TYPE 2 DECISION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, creating an administrative variance for lot size for up to 500 square feet could relieve material hardship in specific circumstances; and WHEREAS, on May 24, 2007, the City of Tukwila Planning Commission held a public hearing on proposed amendments to regulate applications for these variances and has recommended the adoption of certain Zoning Code changes; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the proposed amendments July 16, 2007, after proper notice; and WHEREAS, after having received and studied staff analysis and comments from members of the public, the City Council believes that certain amendments to the City's development regulations are desirable; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. TMC Chapter 18.50, "Supplemental Development Standards," is hereby amended to add the following section: TMC 18.50.140 Administrative Lot Area Variance in LDR A property owner in the LDR zone may apply for a reduction in lot size of up to 500 square feet per lot for up to two lots. This shall be processed as a Type 2 decision concurrent with the short plat or boundary line adjustment application and approved only if all of the following criteria would be met: 1. The current or past property owner has not reduced the area of the lot in question by BLA, short plat or sale of adjacent lots under common ownership, after the effective date of Ordinance No. 2097 (August 6. 20051. 2. The new lots would be able to meet all other development standards including setbacks, maximum building footprint. and parking. 3. Lots that have received a reduction in size through the PRD process are not eligible for further reductions through this variance process. 4. The lot must not contain a multi- family structure or an accessory dwelling unit. 5. The variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location or surrounding of the subject property, in order to provide C:1Documents and Settins'AR Users\ Desktopl Kell}WISDATA\OrdinanceslAdmin Lot Variance.doc NUaan 7/5/2007 Page 1 of 5 it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subiect property is located. 6. The variance permitted is the minimum variance necessary to relieve a hardship which cannot be relieved by any other means. 7. The granting of the variance will not cause a substantial detrimental effect to the public interest. 8. The lot size reduction approved must result in a development that is compatible with and meets the spirit of Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan, and will not adversely affect the character of the neighborhood and the rights of the neighboring property owners. Section 2. Ordinance Nos. 2119 §1 and 2135 §19, as codified at TIvIC 18.104.010, are hereby amended to read as follows: 18.104.010 Classification of Project Permit Applications A. Project permit decisions are classified into five types, based on the degree of discretion associated with each decision, as set forth in this section. Procedures for the five different types are distinguished according to who makes the decision, whether public notice is required, whether a public meeting and /or a public hearing is required before a decision is made, and whether administrative appeals are provided. B. TYPE 1 DECISIONS are made by City administrators who have technical expertise as designated by ordinance. Type 1 decisions may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner who will hold a closed record appeal hearing based on the information presented to the City administrator who made the decision. Public notice is not required for Type 1 decisions or for the appeals of those decisions. TYPE 1 DECISIONS TYPE OF PERMIT 1 DECISION MAKER 1 Any land use permit or approval issued by the As specified by Ordinance City, unless specifically categorized as a Type 2, 3, 4, or 5 decision by this Chapter Boundary Line Adjustment, including Lot Community Development Director Consolidation (TMC 17.08) 1 Development Permit Building Official Minor modification to BAR- approved design Community Development Director (TMC 18.60.030) 1 Minor Modification to PRD (TMC 18.46.130) Community Development Director 1 Sign Permit, except for those sign permits Community Development Director specifically requiring approval of the Planning Commission, or denials of sign permits that are appealable 1 Tree Permit (TMC 18.54) 1 Community Development Director 1 Wireless Communication Facility, Minor Community Development Director (TMC 18.58) C. TYPE 2 DECISIONS are decisions which are initially made by the Director or, in certain cases, other City administrators or committees, but which are subject to an open record appeal to the Hearing Examiner, Planning Commission, City Council, or, in the case of shoreline permits, an appeal to the State Shoreline Hearings Board pursuant to RCW 90.58. C:\Documents and Settinas\All Users1Deslc top \KelIydv1SDATA\OrdinancestAdmin Lot Variance.doc NG 7/5/2007 Page 2 of 5 TYPE 2 DECISIONS INITIAL APPEAL BODY TYPE OF PERMIT DECISION MAKER (open record appeal) Administrative Design Review Community Board of (TMC 18.60.030) Development Director Architectural Review Administrative Lot Area Community Hearin Examiner Variance in LDR Development (TMC 18.50.140) Director Administrative Planned Short Plat Committee Hearing Examiner Residential Development (TMC 18.46) Binding Site Improvement Plan Short PIat Committee Hearing Examiner (TMC Chapter 17.16) Cargo Container Placement Community Hearing Examiner (TMC 18.50.060) Development Director Code Interpretation Community Hearing Examiner (TMC 18.90.010) Development Director Commercial Redevelopment Community Board of Architectural Area waiver of certain setback Development Director Review and landscape standards (TMC 18.16.080, 18.22.080, 18.24.080) Exception from Single Family Community City Council Design Standard (TMC 18.50.050) Development Director Parking standard for use not Community City Council specified (TMC 18.56.100) Development Director Sensitive Area decision (except Community Planning Commission Reasonable Use Exception) Development Director (TMC 18.45) Shoreline Substantial Community State Shoreline Development Permit Development Director Hearings Board (TIvIC Chapter 18.44) 1 Short Plat (TMC 17.12) 1 Short Plat Committee 1 Hearing Examiner 1 Sign Area Increase Community Planning Commission (TMC 19.32.140) Development Director Sign Permit Denial Community Planning Commission (TMC Chapter 19.12.020) Development Director Special Permission Parking, and Community Hearing Examiner Shared, Covenant or Development Director Complimentary Parking (TMC 18.56.065 and .070) Special Permission Landscape Community Board of Architectural Approvals (TMC 18.52.020) Development Director Review Special Permission Sign, except Community Planning Commission "unique sign" (various sections Development Director of TMC Title 19) Structures over public R -O -W Community Hearing Examiner (TMC 18.50.130) Development Director Variance from Parking Standards Community Hearing Examiner less than 10% (TMC 18.56.140) Development Director Wireless Communication Community Hearing Examiner Facility, Minor (TMC 18.58) Development Director D. TYPE 3 DECISIONS are quasi judicial decisions made by the Hearing Examiner following an open record hearing. Type 3 decisions may be appealed only to Superior Court, except for shoreline variances that may be appealed to the State Shoreline Hearings Board pursuant to RCW 90.58. C:\Documents and Settings■All Users Desktop \Kelly W1SDATA \Ordinance \Admin Lot Variance.doc NG:ksn 7/5/2007 Page 3 of 5 TYPE 3 DECISIONS TYPE OF PERMIT 1 DECISION MAKER J 1 Resolve uncertain zone district boundary 1 Hearing Examiner Variance (zoning, shoreline, sidewalk, land alteration, sign) 1 Hearing Examiner E. TYPE 4 DECISIONS are quasi judicial decisions made by the Board of Architectural Review or the Planning Commission, following an open record hearing. Type 4 decisions may be appealed to the City Council, which will hold a closed record appeal hearing based on the record established by the Board of Architectural Review or Planning Commission, except Shoreline Conditional Use Permits, which are appealable to the State Shoreline Hearings Board pursuant to RCW 90.58. TYPE 4 DECISIONS INITTIAL DECISION APPEAL BODY TYPE OF PERMIT MAKER (closed record appeal) Commercial Redevelopment Area Board of Architectural Hearing Examiner waiver of certain setback and Review landscape standards (TMC 18.16.080, 18.22.080, 18.24.080) Conditional Use Permit Planning Commission City Council (TMC Chapter 18.64) Modification or Waiver to Loading Planning Commission Hearing Examiner Zone or Bicycle Parking Requirements (TMC 18.56.060 or .130) Public Hearing Design Review Board of Architectural City Council (TMC Chapter 18.60, 18.56.040 and Review Shoreline Master Program) Reasonable Use Exceptions under Planning Commission City Council Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45.180) Shoreline Conditional Use Permit Planning Commission State Shoreline (TMC 18.44.050) Hearings Board Subdivision Preliminary Plat Planning City Council (TMC 17.14.020) Commission Unique Signs Planning Commission City Council (TMC 19.28.010) Variance from Parking Standards Planning Commission City Council Over 10% (TMC 18.56.140) Wireless Communication Planning City Council Facility, Major or Waiver Request Commission (TMC 18.58) F. TYPE 5 DECISIONS are quasi judicial decisions made by the City Council following an open record hearing. Type 5 decisions may be appealed only to Superior Court. TYPE 5 DECISIONS TYPE OF PERMIT DECISION MAKER Planned Residential Development (PRD), including Major City Council Modifications (TMC Chapter 18.46) Rezone (TMC Chapter 18.84) City Council Sensitive Area Master Plan Overlay (TMC 18.45.160) 1 City Council Shoreline Environment Re- designation (Shoreline Master City Council Program) Subdivision Final Plat (TMC 17.14.030) City Council Unclassified Use (TMC Chapter 18.66) City Council C:\Documents and Settings \All Users Desktop \Kelly\MSDATA` Ordinances \Admin Lot Variance.doc NG:Isn 7158007 Page 4 of 5 Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2007. ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk Filed with the City Clerk: APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Office of the City Attorney Ordinance Number: C5Doeuments and Setting: Mil User\ Deskt op \Kelly'MSDATA \OrdinancesNAdmin Lot Variance.doc NG:ksn 7/5/2007 Page 5 of 5 Communitv Affairs Parks Committee Minutes June 26, 2007 Pace 2 thresholds and an optional DNS process. After the Planning Commission held a public hearing, they recommended approval of the proposed amendment of increasing the residential construction threshold to nine dwelling units from four dwelling units; increasing the commercial/industrial threshold to 12,000 square feet and 40 parking spaces from 4,000 square feet and 20 parking spaces; and exercising the optional determination of non significance (DNS) process to run concurrent comment periods for the project and SEPA. Staff commented that when the City originally implemented SEPA, we did not yet have an SAO in place. The Committee supports the Planning Commission recommendation. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO JULY 9 COW. C. Zoning Code Amendments Staff brought forth four proposed Zoning Code amendments. 1. Limitation on single family expansions with non conforming setbacks 2. Retaining wall setback changes 3. Administrative variance for single family lot size 4. Update to Permit Application Table at TMC 18.104.010 These amendments were originally introduced at the April 10, 2007, Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting. They were then forwarded to COW for discussion, and from there to the Planning Commission for a public hearing and subsequent recommendation. After a lengthy discussion, the Committee agreed to forward Amendments 1 and 4 to the COW for discussion, and they are in support of the Planning Commission's recommendations for those amendments. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL FOR AMENDMENTS 1 and 4. FORWARD TO JULY 9 COW. In regards to Amendment 2, Retaining Wall Setback Changes, Dennis expressed concern with the wording of number four of the setback waiver. His concern is that number four will nullify the parameters set forth in numbers one through three if the applicant can attribute their need for a retaining wall to fire access requirements. Dennis would like to draft a proposed wording change for number four that staff can submit for consideration along with the Planning Commission recommendation when the amendment moves forward to the COW for further discussion. FORWARD TO JULY 9 COW. The Committee is not in consensus with Amendment 3, Administrative Variance for Single Family Lot Size. Both Pam Linder and Pam Carter feel that the changes proposed by the amendment do not create provisions that would substantially affect the quality of life for Tukwila's single family home residents; and that the 500 square foot variance will allow for flexibility assisting interested property owners who are minimally under the threshold for subdivision. In contrast, Dennis shared his concern for property owners who bought in a particular location as a result of spatial housing and lot sizes. He does not support this amendment because he feels implementation of such variances for lot subdivisions has the potential to disturb the well -being of neighborhoods with the consideration that the majority of homeowners purchased their home because of the lot size layout and prefer for the lot sizes to be maintained as such. COMMITTEE IS NOT IN CONSENSUS. FORWARD TO JULY 9 COW. Tentative Agenda Schedule �C3T I�� 1YTG �1G 1V EETING4 July 2 9 16 23 4th Special Presentation: Special Presentation: Independence Day See agenda packet Tukwila Community WSDOT 1-405 (City offices closed) cover sheet for this Schools Collaboration construction update year -end report 30th week's agenda Deborah Salas, Executive Fifth Monday of the (july 9 2007 Director month no Council Committee of the Whole meeting) Public Hearings: meeting scheduled An ordinance raising COMMITTEE OF THE the threshold for WHOLE MEETING TO BE SEPA environmental FOLLOWED BY A SPECIAL review, and to adopt MEETING the Optional DNS process under WAC 197 -11 -355. Zoning Code amendments (4) Unfinished Business: A resolution rejecting the bids submitted for the Green River Pedestrian and Utility Bridge Project An ordinance authorizing and providing for the acquisition of land for the purpose of constructing the Tukwila International Boulevard Phases 2 and 3 road improvements A resolution waiving the bidding requirements and authorizing the purchase of an emergency advisory AM radio station Tukwila Village review August 6 13 20 27 Special Presentation: All Nations Cup update: Jessica Breznau, All Nations Cup Upcoming Meetings Events JULY 2007 9th (Monday) 10th (Tuesday) 11th (Wednesday) 12th (Thursday) 13th (Friday) 14th (Saturday) Transportation Arts FREE CONCERTS! Water Carnival at Artists' Reception TUKWILA DAYS Cmtc, Commission, Cascade View Tukwila City Pool 6:00 to 7:00 PM COMMUNITY 5:00 PM 4:00 PM Community Park 3:00 to 4:00 PM at the Tukwila FESTIVAL CANCELLED (Community (14211 37th Ave. S.) AND Community Center (at the Tukwila Center) Children's Concert Family Movie Community Center) YCivil Service PLEASE NOTE 12:00 NOON Night at Tukwila SPECIAL DAY C---' Featuring Steve City Pool AND TIME. H comedy y 7:30 to 9:30 PM 4" s a f L FOR JULY 16TH magic! 7 7 Both pool events Ti Community "Music in the Park" r C` Affairs Parks 6:30 7:30 PM are FREE but City Council canned food will be C.A.S.T.T. Pancake Cmte, Featuring One World Committee of collected at the performances Breakfast: 5: the Whole 00 PM Taiko, a Japanese drum door for the (Community 8:00 10:00 AM (CR 43) ensemble Mtg., Tukwila Food Actors' Summer 7:00 PM Pantry. Theatre in Kids Parade: (Council Highway 99 Sister Cities Spaghetti For more Tukwila) Starts at 10:00 AM Chambers) Action Cmte, Dinner Silent rma in otion call Auction f July 13 and 14 Vendor Fair, 7:00 PM 5:00 to 8:00 PM 206 -267 -2350. 7:00 PM Art Show, and (Community (Community Center) 4 Foster Performing Family Fun and Center) Adults -510; Arts Center Enterlaiameat: child/student -S5 3 Admission is 10:00 AM to FREE, but canned 3:00 PM food will be /to collected at the door for the Y Tukwila Food C.A.S.T.T. r r` Pantry. performances For more info call 7:00 PM Sports for Hunger 206 768 -2822. Foster Performine Volleyball Tourney Starts at 6 :00 PM Arts Center (Community Center) Call 206-768-2822 for information k..-) All Nations Cup 2007! Events held at Starfire Sports complex, Fort Dent Park (except the Championship Games on July 29, which will be at Memorial Stadium in Seattle). Visit ti vAv.allnationscup.org or call 206 -267 -9000 for info. This is a two-week soccer toumament and cultural festival like no other. FREE gala Opening Ceremony on July 13! 16th (Monday) 17th (Tuesday) 18th (Wednesday) 19th (Thursday) 20th (Friday) 21st (Saturday) Finance Utilities Cmte, Crime Hot Spots Domestic Pedal with the Safety Cmte, 5:00 PM Task Force Mtg., Violence 5:00 PM (CR 41) 10:00 AM Task Force, President (CR 43) (CR 45) 12:00 NOON Bike ride on the (CR 45) Duwamish Trail with Council Civil Service FREE CONCERTS! Commission, Cascade View Tukwila President Verna 5:00 PM Community Park Historical Griffin. Meet at (CR 43) (14211 37th Ave. S.) Society the Community RESCHEDULED Children's Concert CANCELLED Center at 9:00 AM. FROM JULY 91H 12:00 NOON (next meeting For more Featuring Turk the August 16th) information call City Council Magic Genie! 206- 433 -1834. Regular Mtg., "Music in the Park" 14th Annual 7:00 PM 6:30 -7:30 PM Community (Council Featuring The Popoffs Garage Sale Chambers) July 21 22 Parks Commission, Our website will 5:30 PM have a list of sale (Community Center) locations at www.ci.tukwila. Library Advisory wa.us /yardsale.htm Board, Or, just drive 7:00 PM around Tukwila's (Foster Library) neighborhoods on Sat. Sun. looking for the bright yellow signs! Community Affairs Parks Committee: 2nd 4th Tues., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room #3. Agenda item for 7/10/07 meeting: Reinvesting in Youth Transportation Committee: 2nd 4th Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room 41. 7/9/07 meeting has been cancelled