HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2006-05-22 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET
~~~~~~ Tukwila City Council Agenda
&~\\ +++ COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE +++
+ +
-li l!G>
: '-1 Steven M. Mullet, lVfayor COlmcilmembers: · Joe Duffie. Joan Hernandez
<~ I EO
,#>\ !~
... '\ ~. Rhonda Berry, CitJ} Administrator . Pam Carter. Jim Haggerton
... .......~._._./"
1908 Dennis Robertson, Council President · Pamela Linder . Verna Griffin
Monday, May 22, 2006; 7:00 PM Tukwila City Hall; Council Chambers
1. CALL TO ORDER I PLEDGE OF ALLEGIA1'\TCE
2. SPECIAL a. A proclamation designating the period of May 21-27, 2006
PRESENTATIONS as National Public Works Week.
b. Presentation by Kimberly Resor, Kent Fire Department,
on Commullity Emergency Response Teams (CERTS) (15 mins.)
3. CmZEN At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included
COMMENT on this agenda. To comment on an item listed 011 this agenda, please
save your comments until the issue is presented for discussion.
4. SPECIAL a. Community Emergency Response Teams (CERTS).
ISSUES b. Concurrency Modeling consultant agreement.
c. Interlocal agreement for cooperation in acceptance and use of
Department of Justice/Cops More grant funds.
d. Contract with Securitas Security Services for court security
e. Volunteer Coordinator position.
f. Interlocal agreement with the City of Seattle for Hearing
Examiner Services.
g. Subdivision Code Changes ordinance.
5. REPORTS a. Mayor c. Staff e. Intergovernmental
b. City Council d. City Attorney
6. MISCELLANEOUS
7. EXECUTIVE SESSION
8. ADJOURN TO SPECIAL MEETING
++. SPECIAL MEETING .+.
+ +
· Grd # 2124 . Res #1606
1. CALL TO ORDER I PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CONSENT Approval of vouchers.
AGENDA
3. ADJOURNMENT
Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible.
Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice
to the City Clerk's Office 206-433-1800fTDD 206-248-2933. This notice is available at www.ci.tukwiIa.wa.us
and in alternate formats with advance notice for those ,,~th disabilities.
Tukwila Council meetings are audio taped.
.;.~~::'-':
;)
t~~i ti~~.
.~...rq~
'=-{*f
tl
ltfi ~~~~.
'~~~ir*1-
'~!.7;f;f;..
.~~~ff.t~~~~} l~?;~~':;:j. ..:~,.:.;."l,f:~.',~,',~:.f,.'~"';';"';.'.;,',;,'.',:.'.:~.'.:\i.:,;,;.':',:.:.'..,~,',',;,'"~,,,-~,~,:'}"'.t::,.:.~....
:~t::~~.t:~H:~i,~~;..,U~~~~ ".~ _"
..;::~~"i" ,~~~~~~~~;;.
~t~~~~H~E ~&}~~.~~!t~
,..i:~"1~~~", ~11~;~f~;i.
~\~~i.iil~~ ~~~;{~Uk::Jt
?;~\r,[~I~iJ~;jf~!j~
Office of the Mayor
Tukwila, Washington
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the Public l(Vorks services provided in our community are
an integral part of the daily lives of our citizens; and
WHEREAS, the efficient and effective provision of these services greatly
enhances the health, safety, and welfare of our community; and
WHEREAS, quality and effectiveness in the design and construction of
public facilities and in the provision of public services is vitally dependent on
the knowledge, skills, and dedication of the Public Works staff and officials in
the City of Tukwila, and
WHEREAS, the support of the community and the understanding of the
importance of the work performed by Public Works staff materially
influences their ability to respond to the needs of the citizens,
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Steven M. Mullet, Mayor of the City of Tukwila,
do hereby proclaim May 21 through May 27, 2006, with this year's theme
"Publk Works: The Heart of Every Community," as
National Public Works Week
in the City of Tukwila, and I invite all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint
themselves with the challenges confronted in the daily provision of public works
services in our community and to recognize the daily contributions our Public
Works Department staff ~e to our health, safety and quality of life.
Signed this 9 day of tv) ~! 2006.
Q.'<.~, ~'v'\. \v"'.v.1..l.....\-
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor of Tukwila
~ ~<~"""",.",,
..-: :::1i...:;~~. ,t,:i;~~: :~.
',-;';_ -11:'~' ~.~ ~,:-' t ~ ~t~. .:;:
':'1;;~ :.~ .i!;.:...:;~~.:: .\~W
~I""',','i'i~' "{\",,,tl:~'
.t~\~~,,~y; ':'~{:~~J!'
-,'~"'I!>',::' :~.,~:,';:'
;~.:::!:;'~I,,\\': WiiE!:~'..ii.
",':_, .~":~h:"" ..,,\,.
~,:.~",j~~~" "I~\'\':':f: .
"~~~~!-!,F ':~{~~h!"
:i~;i~r\\~t:r!?1!~~~%
J~:,~,,*~,,~,.~ ~~N\':':'~!'
'~~~~;j.~' "\\~l~~~'
II
'~~'~1;,:;.
II
11
t~\
!Iff.. ",.1)"1.\
'~ft{!~
,~~~ :~:~;\
'~lli:~1
.~i~w~'
',!::;jp..
w;:*~\
~i~ :::&
\i{i~ {~~~
,~:~; ::::~~~~
...~'\.....~ ::,~:
~~
W COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
I
vttak ITEMNo.
a 1 e\feetias Date 1 Prepared by 1 la„ ret
r't 'e� G
1 u m
rui /i w I
Nl. f J El 1 5/22/06 1 JM (M1 iC r1_ I EJ.U� I
I I V 1 1 Q
isas I I I 1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 06-059 1 ORIGThiAL AGEaNDA DATE: MAY 22, 2006
AGENDA TITLE Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT)
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resoluiion Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing p Otbsr
Mtg Da e 5/22/06 Mfg Date Mtg Da e lftg Da✓ 3fttg Dat \ftg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Financa Fire Legal P &R Police PTY/
SPONSOR'S Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT) are members of the neighborhood who
SUNBURY are trained to respond to immediate needs after a disaster. CERT members augment
emergency service's capabilities and have been extremely helpful in other parts of the
country after earthquakes, hurricanes and large forest fires. Discussion on the need for a
Public Education Officer who can train and certify our citizens, who can then help
themselves.
REVIEWED BY COW bltg CA&P Cmte F&S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte At. Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 5/1/06
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPO•SOR /ADMIN.
COMMITTEE Unanimous approval to forward to COW for discussion.
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPEND1TUREREQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$0.00 $0.00 $65,000.00
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
5/22/06
MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS
5/22/06 Information Memo dated April 24, 2006
Finance Safety Committee Meeting Minutes from May 1, 2006
Informational Memorandum
From:
Mayor and City Council
Director Emergency Management~
April 24, 2006
Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT)
To:
Date:
Subject:
Are You Ready?
ISSUE:
Should Tukwila establish a CERT Program?
BACKGROUND:
Disasters, whether natural or manmade, have several things io co=on. First, they are relatively
unexpected and certainly unplanned. Secondly, even though your first responders - Fire, Police, and
Public Works - will work to provide response, they will be overwhelmed io a major event and damage
to the infrastructure may further restrict their operations. Thirdly, lives, public health, and the
environment will be endangered. Disaster victims may be killed or iojured and public health issues
may arise.
As we saw io New Orleans, LA, Gulfport, MS, and Biloxi, MS power was virtually nonexistent (still
is), co=unications did not work, and transportation corridors were cut off. In the hours immediately
followiog Hurricane Katrina, iodividuals had a feeling of relief because they survived. However, those
positive moments gave way to feelings of helplessness - '\Vhere to go; What would tomorrow bring;
How to start to rebuild their lives; How to get water, food, and shelter.
Co=unity Emergency Response Teams (CERTs) may respond to immediate needs io their
neighborhoods or workplaces. Members of a neighborhood who want to better prepare for the hazards
that threaten their communities fonn CERTs. After training, CERT members augment emergency
services capabilities, when called upon.
. During the Northridge earthquake, CERTs participated io search and rescue, medical treatment,
patient transport, fire suppression, and utility control.
. During Hurricane Floyd, CERTs io Florida were called upon by the Emergency Operations
Center (EO C) to contact special-needs residents to determine whether they would need shelters
and transportation.
. About a dozen CERTs were used during the Hidden Lake and Lake Louise fires to provide
food for the firefighters, move supplies, and assist ,vith the preparation io the area.
H:WUBWORKS\Emergency Operations\CERT Memo gldoc
Page 1 of2
DISCUSSION:
Besides disaster-related activities, CERTs have the potential to become a known and trusted volunteer
resource that can actively support the response community in many ways. The following quotes from
CERT members says it best:
"I think that we're a backup to emergency services that are overwhelmed. I also see us in
building upon, within the community, of learning, of meeting your neighbors, or people on
other parts of your community and becoming more comfortable with them and sharing
knowledge and resources. It feels good knowing other people in the community and that
they care as much as you do about the community "
"The idea for CERT is to prepare yoprself for anything that might happen to you. In other
words, if you're able to take care of yourself, and each person is able to take care of
themselves, and they're prepared to do so, then overall everybody cooperatively has
worked toward the same goal and it lessens the burden on the actual emergency personneL"
When first response resources are inadequate for the situation, emergency services must focus on the
highest priority needs. Police will be engaged with incidents that have a grave impact on public safety
Firefighters will be involved with suppressing major fires. Public Works will be restoring utility
systems to operation. Additionally, it could be that our response capability has been decimated by a
pandemic flu (Bird Flu). Lower priority needs \vill have to be met in other ways. In these instances,
CERTs may become responders in their neighborhoods or workplaces.
A good CERT training program encompasses:
. Level 1 17 Yz hours (2 Yz hour sessions a week) - Preparing for emergency response,
earthquake awareness, disaster fire suppression techniques (CERT members do not suppress
large fires), disaster medical operations, light search and rescue - CERT members do not enter
heavily damaged structures, team organization and management, utility shutoffs,
communications, damage assessment, terrorism awareness, etc.
. Level 2: l2 hours - Introduction to disaster services, mass care, shelter operations.
. Level 3 50 hours - Emergency response advanced first aid.
The courses need to be taught by a full-time, trained professional and refreshed on a regular basis.
Levell would be Tubvila's responsibility The logical assignment for this training responsibility is
Tukwila's Fire Department requested Public Education Officer. This would be an annual expense of
$65,000. The American Red Cross usually teaches Level 2 and 3
Those members of our community who rely most on government services will suffer the most and
need even greater support after a disaster. CERT can help them help themselves.
RECOMMENDATION:
Tubvila establish a CERT Program to be taught by a full-time, trained professional.
Are Yon Ready?
H:\PUBWORKS\Ernergency Ope.rations\CERT :Memo g1.doc
Page2of2
~
Finance and Safety Committee
May l, 2006, Conference Room #3, S'OOpm
Minutes
Present:
Pam Carter, Chair; Jim Haggerton, Vema Griffin
Rhonda Berry, Lori Sutter, Kevin Fuhrer, Nick Olivas, Jim Morrow,
Mary Miotke, Chuck Parrish, ShelJey O'Keefe
As Jim Morrow had not yet arrived, the meeting began with discussion of the second item
on the agenda.
,-~
OLD BUSIi\'ESS: COUNCIL TECHNOLOGY - CounciJmember Carter stated that at
a previous meeting email and records retention were discussed, and tonight's discussion
will be about devices and what staff should be researching. Items were: laptops,
desktops, blackberries and other handheld PDA devices. The committee discussed
various issues such as cost, training requirements, and maintenance/support needs.
Functions needed include email and document creation, calendar, spreadsheet and
powerpoint capabilities along with internet access. Mary Miotke noted that the cost of
peripheral devices also needs to be addressed, such as printers and associated
consumables (ink, paper, etc.) and their associated maintenance costs.
Councilmember Haggerton asked about voice capabilities and various configurations
were discussed (phone or no phone, city pays for phone or city doesn't pay for phone).
Councilmember Carter mentioned the need for and cost of insurance on these items. This
was folJowed by discussion of the need for policies regarding the use of these items.
\,
After further discussion it was detennined that staff will need to provide the information
requested. Mary Miotke will be coming to COW on the 8th with information regarding
email. It was requested that she provide information on devices to the Committee at their
next meeting on the lSth
>{-
COl\-IMUl\'lTY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAlvl (CERT) PROGRAlv1.
Nick Olivas distributed some handouts and Jim Morrow began the discussion describing
the CERT program. This is a program where we (the City) would undertake an education
program to "train the trainers" in the community We would train community members
who would then train others.
This would be a rigorous program of anywhere from l8 to 28 hours of training taught by
a full-time education officer from the Fire Department. We would be teaching all kinds
of skilJs from the proper way to use a fire extinguisher to first aid, search and rescue, and
how to perform initial damage assessments after a disaster. "This is probably the best
thing we can offer residents and businesses so that they can take care of themselves."
There would be no economic or ethnic boundaries. These trained citizens could become
another set of eyes and ears for our Emergency Management team after a disaster.
',
"
-/
./
,
Finance and Safety ~-tinutes
May I, 2006
Page 2
~
Nick Olivas stated that we would be using our trainer to pass on a lot of information to
the schools, also. They would help educate the kids who would then go home and talk to
their parents, and the information would flow that way, also. Jim Morrow stated that the
federal government has set up basic guidelines that we can tailor any way we want.
Rhonda Berry asked about program costs, and was told that we could apply for
reimbursements through grant funding.
Councilmember Carter stated that the Council would like to do this, that they had asked
the Committee to look at it, get some questions answered, and fmd a way to make it run.
Jim Morrow said that if the committee endorses it, the concept could then go to COW
and then administration could be asked to build it into the budget and look at funding
options. Rhonda Berry stated that this is similar to the Groupwise upgrades, it surfaced
in preliminary budget discussions, but was not funded for 2006.
,
Jim Morrow stated that we should strongly endorse a full time person. This person would
be very involved with the community - having 8-l 0 groups going throughout the week.
This person would work with all departments. Rhonda Berry asked would it be helpful to
have someone rrom another city that currently has a CERT program come to address us.
They currently have CERT programs in Kent, Kirkland, SeaTac, Federal Way, Renton
and Auburn. Nick Olivas and Jim Morrow have spoken with all of them. They all have
full time trainers. Councilmember Carter stated that we would need to fmd out about
costs and liability issues. Jim Morrow stated that liability would not be an issue, the
trainer would be covered like any other employee. We could partner with the schools to
help with costs, along with seeking grants. We would have the challenge of many
cultures in our city - but this person would be a public educator First we need to get this
position funded, then we can work with other cities and the County and we haven't even
begun to talk to businesses yet.
After further discussion it was decided that staff will seek a trainer and a trained citizen
rrom another city to attend the COW on May 22nd to speak to the full council regarding
this program.
Meeting was adjourned at 6.l Opm
p. e. Committee Chair Approval
Minutes prepared by Shelley O'Keefe, Executive Secretary, Mayor's Office
Appoved by Pam Carter, Chair, Finance & Safety Committee
-
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
�J�qS
O j �y Iritiak ITEYSNo.
f `P I i Afeeting Dau I Pr pared by i la;or''s, thw 1 eg nal ret w 1
ustk 5/22/06 1
/06 li t Y gr)i/N
1 1 1
ITEM INFORMATION
I CAS NUMBER: 06-060 I ORIGLNAL AGENDA DATE: MAY 22, 2006
AGENDA ITEM TTIZE Concurrency Modeling Consultant's Agreement with Mirai Transportation
Planning and Engineering.
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Pu blicHearin
g Otkr
JUg Dau 5/22/06 Mfg Date 6/5/06 AN Date 2lftg Date ]Ug Date Aftg Die Mtg Date:
'SPONSOR Council Me or Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire p Legal P&R Polire PIY/
SPONSOR'S The contract is for the transportation modeling services in conjunction with the City's
SUMMARY concurrency management program. At least once per year, a traffic model update will be
done with existing and projected levels of service calculated. Mirai will validate the new
base year model with 2006 traffic counts and prepare a concurrency status report. WIG
Properties at the IC Penney warehouse location is our first applicant and they have paid
$33,383.03 for traffic analysis.
REVIEWED BY COW hftg CA &P Cmte F&S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 5/8/06
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADM IN. Authorize Mavor to sign the agreement with Mirai.
COMMrrrEE Unanimous approval; forward to COW.
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
E%PENDrrURE REQUIRED A OUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$38,364.00 See Revenue noted below $0.00
Fund Source: 000.13.532.200.41.00 Engineering Professional Services (page 126, 2006 Budget)
Comments: Traffic Impact Analysis fee of 533, 383.03 from WIG Properties was receipted on 5 /12/06.
MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
5/22/06
6/5/06
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
5/22/06 Information Memo dated May 2, 2006
Consultant Agreement with Scope of Work
Transportation Committee Meeting Minutes from May 8, 2006
6/5/06 1
INFOR1\lATION MEMO
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor Mullet
Public Works Directo~
May 2, 2006
Concurrency Modeline:
ISSUE
Authorize the Mayor to execute an agreement with Mirai Transportation Planning aud Engineering in
the amount of $38,364 to provide ~nsportation modeling services in conjunction ",~th the City's
Concurrency Management Program. .
BACKGROUND
In December 2005, the City updated its Transportation Element as part of the state-required update to
the Comprehensive Plan. In the Transportation Element, level of service standards are established
which Tubvila is required to implement and maintain. One tool to assist the City is the emme/2 traffic
model that was used to develop the Transportation Element. Mirai Associates, now called Mirai
Transportation Planning and Engineering, was the consultant retained by Tubvila in 2002 to develop
the city-wide transportation model.
ANALYSIS
Regular and continuing maintenance of the City's traffic model is beneficial in several ways. First, in
2015 when the City must again update the Comprehensive Plan, a much smaller expense and effort
will be required to model transportation needs. Second, by using the model to support concurrency
management, the City will be assured that adequate transportation facilities will be available to support
growth in a timely manner. It is a powerful tool in scientifically assigning priorities and planning
capacity-related road projects. Thirdly, the City by assuming this responsibility ,viII speed up the
development process and shorten approval times for new applications.
The scope of work is set up to allow for flexibility At least once per year a model update will be done
with existing and projected level of service calculated. Should there be a lot of new development or
growth, an option of a second update within the same calendar year could be done to verifY adequate
capacity remains.
Much, if not ultimately aU, of the costs of this service will be borne by the development community in
the fonn of a fee. This cost to the developer, though not yet finally detennined, is expected to be a
savings of both time and money due to the dramatic change in Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA)
requirements. The fee amount and structure ,viU be brought forward at a future time for approval.
Contributions by the developer of the JC Penney site (Wig Properties) ,viII offSet most of this contract
amount. The remainder of the costs wiU be reimbursed by other development using the fee structure to
be developed.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the Mayor to execute an agreement with Mirai Transportation Planning and Engineering in
the amount not to exceed $38,364 to provide transportation modeling services to maintain the City's
model and support the Concurrency Management Program.
k:'~~.I~&~"='~=_~J:~oX,d~
CONSULTANTAGREE~mNTFOR
TRA1~SPORTATION MODELING SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City ofTukwila, Washington, herein-after referred
to as "the City", and Mimi Transportation Planning and Engineering, hereinafter referred to as "the
Consultant", in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified.
1 Project Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to perform transPortation
modeling services in connection with the project titled Concurrencv Mangement
2. Scope of Services. The Consultimt agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A"
attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies.
3. Time for Performance. Work under this contract shall commence upon the giving of written
notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and
provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement by December 3l, 2006, unless
an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City
4 Payment. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services
rendered under this Agreement as follows:
A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit
"B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not
exceed $38.364 \vithout express written modification of the Agreement signed by the
City
B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress of
the work for partial payment for that portion of the project completed to date. Such
vouchers will be checked by the City and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be made
to the Consultant in the amount approved.
C. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract price earned will be
made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the completion of
the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City
D Payment is provided in this section shall be full compensation for work performed,
services rendered, and for all materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to
complete the work.
E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept
available for inspection by representatives of the City and state for a period of three (3)
years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon request.
/ ,5 J;; f;l tJ /? /6/1\J1J1.-j
5. Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, drawings, specifications and other
materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this
Agreement shall be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is
executed or not. The Consultant shall be pennitted to retain copies, including reproducible
copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with
the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said
documents, drawings, specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than
the project specified in this Agreement.
6. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by
this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws,
ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services to be rendered under this Agreement.
7 Indemnification. The Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its
officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims, losses or liability,
including attorney's fees, arising from injury or death to persons or damage to property
occasioned by any act, omission or failure of the Consultant, its officers, agents and
employees, in performing the work required by this Agreement. With respect to the perform-
ance of this Agreement and as to claims against the City, its officers, agents and employees,
the Consultant expressly waives its immunity under Title 5l of the Revised Code of
Washington, the Industrial Insurance Act, for injuries to its employees, and agrees that the
obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless provided for in this paragraph extends to
any claim brought by or on behalf of any employee of the Consultant. This waiver is mutually
negotiated by the parties. This paragraph shall not apply to any damage resulting from the
sole negligence of the City, its agents and employees. To the extent any of the damages
referenced by this paragraph were caused by or resulted from the concurrent negligence of the
City, its agents or employees, this obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless is valid
and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the Consultant, its officers, agents and
employees.
8. Insurance. The Consultant shall secure and maintain in force throughout the duration of this
contract comprehensive general liability insurance, with a minimum coverage of $500,000 per
occurrence and $l,OOO,OOO aggregate for personal injury; and $500,000 per occurrence!
aggregate for property damage, and professional liability insurance in the amount of
$l,OOO,OOO.
Said general liability policy shall name the City of Tubvila as an additional named insured
and shall include a provision prohibiting cancellation of said policy except upon thirty (30)
days prior written notice to the City Certificates of coverage as required by this section shall
be delivered to the City within fifteen (15) days of execution of this Agreement.
9 Independent Contractor. The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an inde-
pendent contractor \vith respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing
in this Agreement shalll;Je considered to create the relationship of employer and employee
between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the Consultant shall
2
be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services provided under
this Agreement. The City shan not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting
federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state industrial insurance
program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to the Consultant, or any
employee of the Consultant.
10. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or
retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the
Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any
company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any
fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon
or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant,
the City shan have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion to
deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the fun amount of such
fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
11 Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it under
this Agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin, religion,
creed, age, sex or the presence of any physical or sensory handicap in the selection and
retention of employees or procurement of materials or supplies.
l2. Assignment. The Consultant shan not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this
Agreement without the express written consent of the City
13. Non-Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation
provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision.
l4. Termination.
A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10)
days written notice to the Consultant.
B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its
supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant
hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do
so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement
between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses.
15. Attorneys Fees and Costs. In the event either party shall bring suit against the other to
enforce any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such suit shall be entitled to
recover its costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred in such suit ITom the losmg
party
3
l6. Notices. Notices to the City ofTukwila shall be sent to the following address:
City Clerk
City ofTukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
Notices to Consultant shall be sent to the following address:
Mimi TransPortation Planning and Engineering
1l41O NE l22nd Way. Suite 320. Kirkland. W A 98034-6927
17 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda, represents
the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and supersedes all
prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. This Agreement may be
amended only by written instrument signed by both the City and the Consultant.
DATED this
day of
,20
CITY OF TUKWILA
CONSULTANT
BY'~~~
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Printed Name: Tom Noguchi
Title: Principal. Mirai Associates. Inc.
Attest! Authenticated:
Approved as to Form:
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
Office of the City Attorney
4
EXHIBIT A
Tukwila Model Update and Bi-Annual Concurrency Analysis (2006)
Scope of Work
1 The City will work with Mirai to identify traffic count locations.
2. The City will provide traffic count raw data to Mirai. Mirai will review the raw data
and adjust the counts for\PM peak hour Mirai will calculate levels of service
using Synchro.
3. Mirai will prepare an existing condition report (Technical memo for staff use)
4 The City will provide existing land use database to Mirai. Mirai will convert the
land use data for modeling.
5. Mirai will develop a base year model by updating the existing Tukwila model to
be reflective of the new PSRC model. Mirai will validate the new base year model
with 2006 traffic counts.
6. The City will provide the City's CIP and 6 year growth projections. Mirai will
develop 2012 concurrency model.
7 Mirai will post-process the model volumes and calculate 2012 concurrency levels
of service for all designated intersections in the City
8. Mirai will prepare a concurrency status report. (1st Technical memo for staff use)
Mirai will complete the Tasks 1 through 8 by July 2006.
Optional Service
The City may ask Mirai additional concurrency model update and level of service
calculations. The following tasks are possible serves that Mirai may provide:
. Update the concurrency model based on new baseline projects.
. Post-process the volumes from the second model and calculate 2012
concurrency levels of service for all designated intersections in the City
. Prepare a concurrency status report. (2nd Technical memo for staff use)
The City will decide whether the concurrency model should be updated by August 30,
2006. Mirai will not initiate the optional tasks until the City gives a supplemental notice to
proceed.
A~IV-d D
Mirai Proposal for Tukwila Model Update and Bi-Annual Concurrency Analysis
(2006)
Model
Principal Specialist Planner Sucport Total
$160 $126 $85 $60
Tasks Hours Hours Hours Hours
1. The City will work with Mirai to identify traffic
count locations, 2 2 4 0 $912
2. The City will provide traffic count raw data to
Mirai. Mirai will review the raw data and adjust
the counts for PM peak hour Mirai will calculate
levels of service using Synchro. 4 2 48 8 $5,452
3. Mirai will prepare an existing condition report
(Technical memo for staff use) 2 18 10 $2,450
4. The City will provide existing land use
database to Mirai. Mirai will convert the land use
data for modeling. 0 16 8 0 $2,696
5. Mirai will develop a base year model by
updating the existing Tukwila model to be
reflective of the new PSRC model. Mirai will
validate the new base year model with 2006
traffic counts. 10 40 40 0 $10,040
6. The City will provide the City's CIP and 6 year
growth projections. Mirai will develop 2012
concurrency model. 8 24 40 0 $7,704
7 Mirai will post-process the model volumes and
calculate 2012 concurrency levels of service for
all designated intersections in the City 4 8 56 0 $6,408
18. Mlral WIll prepare a concurrency status report.
(Technical memo for staff use) 2 2 18 10 $2,702
Total 32 94 232 28 $38,364
Octional Tasks
9. Mirai will update the concurrency model
based on new baseline projects. 4 12 25 0 $4,277
10. Mirai will post-process the second model
volumes and calculate second 2012
concurrency levels of service for all designated
intersections in the City 2 4 30 0 $3,374
11 Mirai will prepare a concurrency status
report. (Technical memo for staff use) 2 2 18 10 $2,702
Optional Tasks Total 8 18 73 10 $10,353
Transportation Committee
r;fay 3, 2006
Present:
Joe Duffie, Chair; Pam Carter, Joan Hernandez
Jim Morrow, Fran.lc Iriarte, Bob Giberson, Gail Labanara, Chuck Parrish
Paul Lavallee from IBI Group, David Hull & Jack Lanem2ili, rrom KC r,-retro
Presentations
A. Tuln,ila Transit Center
Paul Lavalle presented the PSRC grant submittal of S2.3 million for construction funds and
\vhat is envisioned for the Transit Genter at .A..P\V and B2k~r Blvd. It v.in be an on-street fac11itj
'''lith expanded capacity From the t\vo 'workshops \vith local businesses the main message \vas
safety and security The ne\v amenities \vill be 5 bus bays \"lith a capacity of over I 00 buses Fer
hour, new crosswaLles, improved lighting, cameras mId emergency call buttons, and I I sheltecs
with individual seating as opposed to benches. Right-of-v,ay acquisition is included in t.!Je gIant
for the northbound stop. Joan suggested that the Chamber OfCOIIlGlerCe be given a brieTh.lg and
Pam would like a display at Tubvila Days on July 8. Joe asked that the cover sheet with the site
plan be given to all Council members (attached io minutes). Information Onlv.
:B. "Transit Now" bv King County i'detro
David Hull and Jack Lattemann presented TransIt Now, a new four-point initiative that will exp21lG
transit by up to 20% over lO years. The revenue proposal is to increase sales tax revenue by one-
tenm of one percent (0.1 %) and me average cost to every household is $25 per year in sales ta:\:.
For Tukwila, mey are looking to exp21ld ~e service to Longacre's Tukwila Station to all chy rather
than just during rush hour. Joe had an example of a Tukwila employee who could take the t:;-ain
from Sumner but then is unable to go the last mile and get to the school. David said t.'Iat there are
25 VanS hare vans at the Tu1.'wila Station to help co=uters and the Transit Now plan would
double the current program. Route 150 is scheduled to increase to IS-minute intervals and all day
service. There would also be an additional eastlwe.st route along Southcenter Blvd to serve the li~r.t
rail Tu..1c\vila lnt'l Blvd Station. Jim asked about user fees and ocly 25% of revenue is collected
from fares, winch is a natiomvide average. Joan Was told mat no park and ride lor improvements
are included ill the mitlatlve and there is still a long list for shelters, even if they qualify
Information Onlv.
~
Business Agenda
A. Concurrency iVIodeling. Consultant A!!reement
Jim explained mat v,ith Council's adoption of the Tramportation Element lasT year, ,-\-tere was a
change in how a developer pays for concurrency and impact fees. Tile City will contract for the
transportation impact analysis and it will establish a concurrency fee sheet, similar in form to
the impact fee sheet based on the size and type of development in order to determine the iinpact
on our system. \VIG Properties at the JC Penney warehouse location is our first applicant and
they have already paid 533,383.03 for traffic analysis. WIG wants to move fonvard quickly a:ld
the j'yfirai contract is the first step. Pam was told that the tr>..nspor12tion modeling would have iO
be updated every year and that there would be a neVi CIP page in 2007 for approximately S40-
60,000 Unanimous anoroval. forward to CO'V.
C:\1)c.curr..~:1lS :J.IIU S:=!ti.'1.g5:.GaiI\.~[y Cocurr~ts\W[\1"\VORD\TC tfin:..::es 2c-C6-0S-DS.Jo-.:
?:;g::-l cf::
CO UNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Or s S 2. lnitiaL- ITEMNo.
M> ttn: Dats
C t-1 Z 1 Prepared by 1fa; pr's rsrev f�'rmznlr
N` eta 'a 1 05/22/06 1 mini
1 1 1 P
rsoa 1 1 1 1
1 1 1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 06-061 I ORIGENAI.AGRNDA DATE: MAY 22, 2006
AGENDA ITEMTITIE Interlace' agreement for cooperation in acceptance and use of Department of
Justice /COPS More grant funds.
CATEGORY Disausion Motion Resolution Ordiname BidAward Public Hearing Otbfr
Aftg Dat. 05/22/06 AUg Dat. 06/05/06 Mfg Date kftg Date AUg Date Aft Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Lecgal PesR Police PW
SPONSOR'S The grant allocation of $98,723.00 is earmarked for a valley cities regional wi -fi network
SUMMARY feasibility study. The study will focus on public safety usage as well as economic
development and general public access. The interlocal agreement must be signed in order
to release the funds to the Valley Cities group, which includes the cities of Tukwila, Kent,
Auburn, Renton, Algona, Pacific, Fife, Sumner, and Puyallup.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg CA&P Cmte FR'S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 05/15/06
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Authorize Mayor to sign agreement on 6/5/06 Consent Agenda
ComDU EE Unanimous approval, forward to COW.
COST IMPACT/ FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
so $0 $0
Fund Source: GRANT FUNDED
Connnents: This agreement allows the city to receive funding; therefore, there will be no cost impact.
MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
05/22/06 1 I
I I 1
1
1 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
05/22/06 Information memo dated 5/22/06 from IT Manager
Tukwila PD Grant Funding History 5/22/06 from Darrell Baskin, Asst. Chief
Interlace! Agreement to include Project Abstract
1 Finance Safety Committee Minutes 5/15/05
1
I 1
1 1
To.
From:
Date:
Subject:
Finance & Safety Co=itt~
Mary :tvliotke, IT Manager (lYlifnrI
May 22, 2006
Valley Cities Regional Wireless Network Project
Issue
An interlocal agreement is proposed for cooperation among valley cities in acceptance and use of
a Department of Justice I COPS More Grant allocation. These funds are earmarked for a
regional wi-fi network feasibility study
Backl!round
In early 2005, representatives from the valley cities met to discuss several regional issues that
affect all of our cities. A co=on interest was wireless technology as a solution for public
safety co=umcations and as a possible tool for economic development. Instead of each city
developing individual wireless solutions, a regional approach seemed logical. Several meetings
ensued, approaching the subject from both a technical and economic development viewpoint.
In February 2005, Representative Adam Smith's office contacted the City of Auburn about the
possibility of an earmark grant for funding a valley cities regional \vi-fi network. The valley
cities include Tukwila, Kent, Auburn, Renton, Algona, Pacific, Fife, Sumner and Puyallup. In
recognition of greater interaction between these cities, each city passed a resolution supporting
the formation of a Valley Cities' Association. To this end, Tukwila Resolution #l593 was
signed on November 7,2005 On behalf of the group, an application was made through
Representative Adam Smith's office to request initial funding for a feasibility study for this
project. For greater detail, the project abstract submitted with the grant application is attached
for your review In February 2006, the Valley Cities Association was awarded grant funding in
the amount of $98, 723.00 from the Department of Justice I COPS More Grant.
Over the past few years, the City of Tukwila PD has obtained funding through several federal
grant programs, including the COPSlMore grant fund, which has provided additional employees,
equipment, and technological improvements. For further information and additional clarity, also
attached is an informational memo from Darrell Baskin, Assistant Police Chief, regarding
previous Tukwila PD grant awards.
Discussion
The grant funding is earmarked to answer the follmving questions:
. What fiber, both City-owned and vendor-owned, is available in our cities for large
businesses, especially high tech businesses?
. "Vhat connectivity is currently missing in the downtown cores and through the
industriallco=ercial sectors?
. What is each city currently doing with wi-fi and how could we build a common wi-fi
network to securely meet our business/public safety needs as well as the needs of
economic development?
. What would be the costs for a wi-fi network through the downtown cores and through
industrial/commercial sectors?
. What economies of scale could we get by connecting the entire valley with a combination
fiber and wi-fi network and could it be centrally managed (possibly through
ValleyComm)?
. What other wi-fi initiatives are currently planned for this region?
In order to receive these funds, each member city of the Valley Citie.s Association must assign a
representative for management of the, grant; designate a staff person as the main contact to
receive notices and payments; and agree to and sign the Interlocal Agreement.
Recommendation
Authorize the Mayor to enter into an Interlocal Agreement to accept and appropriate the
Department of Justice I Cops More Grant funds for a Valley Cities Association regional wi-fi
feasibility study
Attachments: Proposed Interlocal Agreement, Initial Project Abstract, Tuk\vila PD Grant
Funding History
To:
From.
Date:
Subject:
tl
Council r:~..,b
Darrell Baskin, Assistant Chief, Tukwila P U
May 22, 2006 '
Informational: Tu1.'wila PD Grant Funding Risto
The Tukwila Police Department strives to seek out and participate in grant funding
opportunities, whether they are federal, local or through private parties.
Over the past few years the department has obtained the following federal grants. This
list is not all-inclusive, but is illustrative of our commitment in this area. The grants are a
mix of COPSlMore, Local Law Enforcement Block Grants (LLEBG), and Byrne
Memorial Grants I Justice Assistance Grants (JAG). These grants have provided us with
additional employees, equipment and technological improvements.
YearlID Agency # Grant Date Closing Date Amount
1995CFWX2679 916001522 03101/1995 07131/2000 $808,512
1996LBVX3833 916001522 10/01/1996 09/30/1998 $54,377
1997CKV\IXK037 916001522 09/30/1997 03/31/2000 $49,924
1997PRWX0012 916001522 05101/1997 04/30/1999 $121,875
1999CMWX2487 916001522 04/01/1999 03/31/2001 $152,679
1999LBVX8590 916001522 10/20/2000 10/31/2002 $63,090
2000LBBX2756 916001522 02106/2001 02128/2003 $38,392
2001LBBX1355 916001522 10/05/2001 10/0412003 $54,236
2002LBBX2701 916001522 10/07/2002 10/06/2004 $38,237
2003LBBX0748 916001522 10/23/2003 10/2212005 $24,457
2004LBBX1023 916001522 11/0212004 11101/2006 $10,631
2005DJBX1715 916001522 10/01/2004 09/30/2008 $23,740
2006 Pending
Of the grants listed above, grants from 1995 through 2003 have been expended and
closed out. Purchases are currently being made using the 2004 grant and it will be closed
out shortly
The 2005 grant is partially expended. The department is currently evaluating our needs
to determine how the remaining funds will be spent.
Finally, paperwork is in place seeking the 2005 JAG grant. More information on this
grant will be available at a later date.
The Tukwila Police Department will continue to seek out funding opportunities in our
continuing effort to reduce crime and improve public safety
r;-\ r;." f71 ~ q
11'1 !r.1 J!,\ ~ luJ
L-J Ut.... lS\.J.
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AMONG GREEN RIVER, WHITE
RIVER AND PUYALLUP RIVER VALLEY CITIES FOR
COOPERATION IN ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE I COPS MORE GRANT
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT made and entered into pursuant to the
intertocal cooperation act, chapter 39.34 of the Revised Code of Washington on this
day of , 2006, by and between the cities of Algona, Auburn,
Fife, Kent, Pacific, Puyallup, Renton. Sumner, and Tukwila each municipal corporations
of the State of Washington
WHEREAS, for the last number of years, there has been a greater interaction
between the cities of Algona, Auburn, Fife, Kent, Pacific, Puyallup, Renton, Sumner, and
TukwiJa, relative to a number of different issues with which they each contend, and on
which they have very similar common or very similar positions; and
WHEREAS, one of those issues is law enforcement; and
WHEREAS, in order to more effectively address law enforcement needs of the
cities, they have joined together in seeking monies to enhance their law enforcement
needs, and have worked with congressman Adam Smith in becoming eligible to receive
grant funds in the amount of ninety eight thousand seven hundred and twenty three
dollars and no/100 ($98,723.00); and
WHEREAS, in order to receive those funds and utilize them in support of their common
and cooperative needs, the parties have reached agreement in connection therewith.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL COVENANTS,
CONDITIONS, PROMISES AND BENEFITS HEREIN, THE PARTIES HERETO
HEREBY AGREE as follows:
1 RECEIPT OF GRANT FUNDS
Each of the cities, as parties hereto, agree to work cooperatively towards the
expenditure of the grant funds received from the Department of Justice / Cops More
Grant, in the total dollar amount of ninety eight thousand seven hundred and twenty
three dollars and no/100 ($98,723.00) which funds shall be received by the City of
Auburn for and on behalf of the parties hereto and which shall be used for the following:
Development of a strategic plan to meet community and public agency
needs through potential uses of fiber optic and wireless broadband infrastructure
and services
Determine the specific operational relationship between a new wire-
linelwireless broadband network and the current local govemment-owned
emergency communications and wide area networks.
Implement a prototype network that demonstrates interoperability by
securely allowing police computer systems from one jurisdiction to route through
another jurisdictions wireless network back to their home agency
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE I COPS MORE GRANT
Page 1
Other wireless network components and or services that will allow
interoperability between public safety entities in the Valley Cities region.
2. DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES
The Mayor or designee of each of the cities hereto shall be designated as each
cities representative to meet, confer, evaluate and administer expenditure proposals in
connection with the Department of Justice I Cops More Grant Funds. The Mayors or
designees shall meet as warranted at dates and times determined by them to be most
convenient. They are also empowered to designate, identify and develop procedures
and processes for their interaction in connection with the administration and use of said
grant funds.
3. INSURANCE
Each of the cities hereto shall be responsible for maintaining, during the term of
this agreement, and at its sole costs and expenses, insurance coverage in amounts
determined to be sufficient, as determined by the Mayors or their designees.
4 INDEMNIFICATION
Each city shall indemnify and hold the other cities, their agents, employees and
officers harmless from and shall defend at its own expense all claims, damages, suits, at
law or equity, actions, penalties, losses, damages or costs of any kind or nature brought
against these cities or any of them, in connection with actions of the individual city
responsible for indemnifying, defending and holding harmless. Any liabilities, claims,
actions, penalties, etc., stemming from the actions of multiple cities shall be addressed
through cooperative efforts of the Chief Administrative Officer of each city or their
designees.
5. WAIVER OF SUBROGATION
The cities hereby mutually release each other from liability and waive all rights of
recovery against each other for any losses by fire or other peril which can be insured
against under fire insurance contracts including extended coverage endorsements which
are customarily available from time to time in the State of Washington.
6. COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS AND LAWS
The parties shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations pertaining to them
in connection with the matters covered herein.
7 ASSIGNMENT
The parties shall not assign this Agreement or any interest, obligation or duty
therein without the express written consent of the other party
8. ATTORNEYS' FEES
If either party shall be required to bring any action to enforce any provision of this
Agreement, or shall be required to defend any action brought by the other party with
respect to this Agreement, and in the further event that one party shall substantially prevail
in such action, the losing party shall, in addition to all other payments required therein, pay
all of the prevailing party's reasonable costs in connection with such action, including such
sums as the court or courts may adjudge reasonable as attorney's fees in the trial court and
in any appellate courts.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE I COPS MORE GRANT
Page 2
9. NOTICES
All notices and payments hereunder may be delivered or mailed. If mailed, they
shall be sent to the following respective addresses:
CITY OF AUBURN CITY OF ALGONA
(name) (name)
(address) (address)
(address) (address)
(phone number) (phone number)
(Fax number) (Fax number)
CITY OF FIFE CITY OF KENT
(name) (name)
(address) (address)
(address) (address)
(phone number) (phone number)
(Fax number) (Fax number)
CITY OF PACIFIC CITY OF PUYALLUP
(name) (name)
(address) (address)
(address) (address)
(phone number) (phone number)
(Fax number) (Fax number)
CITY OF RENTON CITY OF SUMNER
(name) (name)
(address) (address)
(address) (address)
(phone number) (phone number)
(Fax number) (Fax number)
CITY OF TUKWILA
(name)
(address)
(address)
(phone number)
(Fax number)
or to such other respective addresses as either party hereto may hereafter from time to
time designate in writing. All notices and payments mailed by regular post (including first
class) shall be deemed to have been given on the second business day following the date
of mailing, if property mailed and addressed. Notices and payments sent by certified or
registered mail shall be deemed to have been given on the day next following the date of
mailing, if properly mailed and addressed. For all types of mail, the postmark affIXed by the
United States Postal Service shall be conclusive evidence of the date of mailing.
10. NONDISCRIMINATION
Each of the parties, for itself, its heirs, personal representatives, successors in
interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and
agree that it will comply with pertinent statutes, Executive Orders and such rules as are
promulgated to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, national
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE I COPS MORE GRANT
Page 3
origin, sex, age, or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap be
discriminated against or receive discriminatory treatment by reason thereof.
11 MISCELLANEOUS
A. All of the covenants, conditions and agreements in this Agreement shall
extend to and bind the legal successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
B. This Agreement shall be deemed to be made and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Washington jurisdiction and venue for any action arising out of
this Agreement shall be in of the county in Washington State in which the property or
project is located, and if not site specific, then in King County, Washington.
C. The captions in this Agreement are for convenience only and do not in any
way limit or amplify the provisions of this Agreement.
D. The duration of this Agreement shall be for or for the period of time it
reasonably takes for the performances by the parties as completed herein.
E. Unless otherwise specifically provided herein, no separate legal entity is
created hereby, as each of the parties is contracting in its capacity as a municipal
corporation of the State of Washington. The identity of the parties hereto is as set forth
hereinabove.
F The purpose of this Agreement is to accomplish the objectives of this
Agreement.
G. The funding of the respective obligations of the parties shall be out of the
respective general funds/current expenses of the parties, except as otherwise specifically
provided.
H. The performances of the duties of the parties provided hereby shall be done
in accordance with standard operating procedures and customary practices of the parties.
I. Unless a joint oversight and administration board is created as provided
herein, the oversight and administration of the Agreement shall be by the respective named
representatives identified in Paragraphs 2 and/or 9 hereof, or their designees.
J. Unless otherwise specifically provided herein, any real property to be held in
connection herewith, if applicable, shall be held as the separate property of the party or
parties in whose name(s) the property islwas acquired.
K. No provision of this Agreement shall relieve either party of its public agency
obligations and or responsibilities imposed by law.
L. If any term or provision of this Agreement or the application thereof to any
person or circumstance shall, to any extent, be held to be invalid or unenforceable by a final
decision of any court having jurisdiction on the matter, the remainder of this Agreement or
the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to
which it is held invalid or unenforceable shall not be affected thereby and shall continue in
full force and effect, unless such court determines that such invalidity or unenforceability
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE I COPS MORE GRANT
Page 4
materially interferes with or defeats the purposes hereof, at which time the City shall have
the right to terminate the Agreement.
M. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties.
There are no terms, obligations, covenants or conditions other than those contained herein.
No modifications or amendments of this Agreement shall be valid or effective unless
evidenced by an agreement in writing signed by both parties.
N. Copies of this Agreement shall be filed with the Auditor's Office of the
county in Washington State in which the property or project is located, and if not site
specific, then in the King County Auditor's Office; the Secretary of State of the State of
Washington; and the respective Clerks of the parties hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF AUBURN
By'
Its:
ATTEST
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attomey
CITY OF FIFE
By'
Its:
ATTEST
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attomey
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE I COPS MORE GRANT
CITY OF ALGONA
By'
Its:
ATTEST
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attomey
CITY OF KENT
By'
Its:
ATTEST
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attomey
Page 5
CITY OF PACIFIC
By'
Its:
ATTEST
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
CITY OF RENTON
By'
Its:
ATTEST
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
CITY OF TUKWILA
By'
Its:
ATTEST
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE J COPS MORE GRANT
CITY OF PUYALLUP
By'
Its:
ATTEST
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
CITY OF SUMNER
By'
Its:
ATTEST
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Page 6
Project Abstract: Valley Cities Regional "Wireless Network
The cities of the Valley, from Fife to Tukwila, account for more than 65 percent of all
industrial, distribution and warehousing in the Puget Sound Region, and combine to
function as what has become known as the Green River Valley Distribution Hub, an
important and highly effective economic engine for the Puget Sound Region and the
entire state of Washington. Currently, the Valley cities employee more than 85,000
people and have a population of over 250,000. There are more than l2,400 acres of
industrial lands, 164 miles of truck routes and 8,432 acres of commercial land in this
econormc regzon.
Infrastructure is a major compon~nt oftoday's economy We continue to work on
transportation issues but cannot leave out the need for a robust Information Highway
The Internet has become a normal part of daily life for all businesses. From banking to
procurement to customer sales and support and all of the other functions of business, the
internet has become the primary information highway Fast, round the clock, online
communications is a requirement for all industry to support quicker time to market, better
gove=ent services, higher education and public safety
Cities in the Valley, like Auburn, are looking at the feasibility ofa regional wireless
broadband network that would support these initiatives. We have warehouse space that is
not served by mainstream communications vendors. This space goes un-leased due to the
limited availability of reasonably priced high-speed internet services. By making such a
network available where current c.ommercial services are lacking, the Valley Cities would
be encouraging economic development in those areas and improving the communication
and technology infrastructure for future development.
The benefits of such a network are not limited to the business c.ommunity Imagine the
police .officers with the entire regional crime database at their fingertips in their patrol
car, making the valley region safer. Imagine a contractor that can request a building
inspection from the field and, in turn, the building inspector that can file the inspection
report and approve a pennit from the job site, allO\ving immediate continuation of the
project. A wireless network throughout the valley would accommodate these and other
functions by providing an on-demand communications infrastructure.
Technology changes quickly and as such a cancise plan is required to maximize the
investment. The Valley cities are proposing that this grant fund a feasibility study and
strategic plan that would help us establish the short and long term strategy for
implementing a wireless broadband network. Of prime concern is the ongoing
maintenance and operations of such a network. It is well know that successful
infOnnatiOD technology projects are those in which the time and effort is spent up front to
plan. We expect that the cost to produce such a plan would be up ta $100,000. We
would also propose that the grant fund the initial start up of the wireless network and
service environment. We anticipate that cost to be 3.5 million dollars.
A1;, a region, this infonnatioD highway is of extreme economic importance and the Valley
cities of Renton, Tukwila, Kent, Auburn, Algona, Pacific, Sumner, Fife and Puyallup are
committed to working tagether to provide this required resource to our citizens and
economic partners.
Finance and Safety Committee
May IS, 2006, Conference Room #3, 5:00pm
Minutes
Present:
Pam Carter, Chair; Jim Haggerton, Vema Griffin
Rhonda Berry, Bruce Fletcher, Kimberly Walden, Trish Kinlow. Kevin
Fuhrer, Mary Miotke, Chuck Parrish, Shelley O'Keefe
Contract with Securitas Security Services for Court: The previous contract for court
security expired December 3l, 2005. The new contract is essentially the same as the
previous one, except it incorporates a cost of living increase. The Judge noted that she is
very pleased with the company and the security officer that is working here. He has done
a great job dealing with the diverse clientele he experiences on a daily basis. The total
extra cost comes to $3,000 - which can be absorbed by the Court's budget. Increase
would start May 26 of this year. Contract will be identical with just the dollar difference.
Memo should be revised to incorporate changes to contract. Forward to COW with
unanimous endorsement.
Volunteer Coordinator Position: The 2006 budget provides for a 1.0 FTE
Volunteer/Special Events Coordinator. The Y2 FTE Special Events Coordinator has
already gone through the selection process, and Bruce announced that Shannon Fisher
will fill this position. Now they are ready to move forward with the Volunteer
Coordinator position. Bruce has made proposal to Mayor's office to expand this position
from V2 to % time. This would be paid for with salary savings this year - but would
require a budget increase in 2007 There was discussion about what this person would
accomplish - having a database of all city volunteers, spending significant time recruiting
- the committee questioned if a % time person would be enough. What would the
financial impact be? Bruce said it would probably be $20klyear. The committee noted
that the information memo needs to be revised to include the dollar impacts. Forward to
COW with unanimous approval.
~
Interlocal Agreement for cooperation in acceptance and use of Department of
Justice/Cops More Grant Funds: An interlocal agreement is proposed for cooperation
among Valley Cities in acceptance and use of a Department of Justice/Cops More Grant
allocation - the funds being earmarked for a regional wi-fi network feasibility study
Adam Smith's office was the backer for this as a regional group - thought it would be
good for economic development in the valley A selling point is to have wireless
available all up and down the valley The first phase will be public safety - second phase
for business core - third phase would be public access. The money has been secured; the
grant was given; now we need to sign the interlocal. This will not cost the City anything.
The monies will not come to us directly - will go to consultants. The monies will pay for
work being done by IT reps from various cities and possibly some consultants. Rhonda
noted that we have received Cops More dollars in the past, and Mary will find out what
we used those monies for and incorporate that into the information memo. Forward to
COW with unanimous endorsement of Committee.
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
p 1 1 Tritia/t IT&wNo.
E Vi 1 1 Mzelir,,2 Date 1 Pretiared at y T
.11v�,r' r •r Gx:atresre
N'•• i e.' 1 05/22/06 1 kaw /ab 1 �i �i 1.1,4k
1908 I 1 I 1
I
1 1 1 I
ITEM INFORMATION
I CAS NUMBER: 06-062 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 5/22/06
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Contract with Securitas Security services for court
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Volution Ordinance Bid Award Pub& Hearing 0 Other
1Ug Date 5/22/06 :lftg Date 6/5/06 Aftg Date AftgDate Mtg Date MUg Date 3ftg Date
I SPONSOR Conncil Major Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal Petit Police PIV
SPONSOR'S Approval of contract renewal for Securitas
SUMMARY
REVIEWED BY COW Nftg. CA &P Cmte ®5 &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
p Utilities Cmte Arts Comm Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 5/15/06
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADAMS. Approve and forward to Regular Meeting
COMMITTEE Forward to Committee of the Whole and Regular Meeting for approval
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGE APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Snot to exceed $45,000 2006 $45,000
Fund Source: COURT SECURITY 523.300.41.04
Comments:
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 1
5/22/06 1
I MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS
5/22/06 Information memo dated 5/11/06 from Judge Walden to F&S Cmte
Copy of Securitas Contract
i 1 Finance and Safety Minutes dated 5/15/06
1
Tukwila Municipal Court
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188-2599
206-433-1840 . Fax: 206-433-7160 . E-mail: http://l'lww.tuk.l'la.gov/court
v,,-"'i_Q,. '1.J~,
-"~~~:::;: ..;;g0
i~~\
~. :: -=- .:.:. ~
~{~S' ~o>~/"
Kimberly A. Walden
Presiding Judge
LaTricia R. Kinlaw
Court Administrator
From.
Finance & Safety Committee
Judge Kimberly A. walden-fSfj
May 11, 2006
To'
Date:
Subject:
Court Security Services Contract Renewal with Cost of Living
Addendum
Issue: Securitas Security provides continuous daily security services for Tukwila
Municipal Court. Their services were contracted in May of 2005 and the contract
expired December 31, 2005. The expiration of the contract was brought to our
attention when we received the attached contract addendum from Securitas
requesting a cost of living adjustment. The court administrator, LaTricia Kin/ow,
contacted Securitas immediately. The Securitas Branch Manager will forward a
current contract to the City by May 12th
Backaround: The contract between the City of Tukwila and Securitas came
about when the court and police departments determined they lacked necessary
resources to screen individuals seeking entry into the court are for unlawful
weapons, items that may be used as a weapon, and contraband. After receiving
three bids for service, and determining the proposal submitted by Securitas met
the needs of our organization, the City entered into this agreement.
Over the past year, Securitas has provided exceptional service to our
organization. The primary security officer, Richard Eastwood, is here on a
regular basis and is a great asset to the court team.
Recommendation: Because Securitas has met the stipulations of the previous
agreement, and the court is pleased with the service provided by Securitas, it is
the court's recommendation the contract be approved as long is it keeps with the
specifications of the previous agreement with the minor change in costs due to
the cost of living increase. The court budget can accommodate the associated
costs.
~2-06-'06 B6 16 F~1-
T-829 P02/07 U-836
COntract No.
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
This Agr."mont is entered into by and be"v",," lhe City of Tukwila, Washington, a non-charter
optional municipal code city hereinafter reftrred to as "the City", and SECURITAS SECURITY
SERVICES USA, Inc , hereinafter refe.'Ted to as "the Contractor", whose principal oftice is !cc~t<<J
at BeJlevne, Washington.
WHEREAS, tho City has determined the ne"d to have certain servic.os pcrfomlod for its
citizens but does not have the personnel or expertise to perform such service,; and
WfiEREAS, the City desires to have the Contractor perlOW such selYices oursuant to
certain terms and conditions; now, therefore, .
IN CONSlDERA TION OF tho mutual bonefits and conditions hereinafter contained, the
parties bereto agree as foHows:
1. Sco 0 and cbedulo of Services to be Perfornted bv Contractor The Contractor
shall perform those servie<;s describ" on Exhibit A att<:ched hereto and incorporated herein by Ihis
reference as if fully set forth. ' In performing such servires, the Contractor shaH at aH times comply
with aI1l'ederal, State, and local statutes, rules and ordinances applicable to the p~rfonnance of sucb
service."S and the handling of any funds u.e<! in connection therewith. The Contractor shaH request
and obtain prior written approval from the City iflbe scope Or schedule is to be modi lIed in an)' way
2. Comoensation and Method of 'paYment. The Cil)' shall pay the Contractor for
services rendered acoording to the rate and method set forth on Exhibit B attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this rderence. YDe total amount to be paid shan not exceed S 45,000.00.
3. Contractor Bnde.t. The Contractor shall apply the funds re<:elved nnder this
Agreement within the maximum limits s<>t forth in Ihis Agreement. The Contractor shall re<\ue~t
prior approval from me City wheneyer the Contractor desires to amend its budget in any way
4, Dnration of A""eement. This Agreement shan be in fun force and effect for a
period commencing _Jl.lay 26, 2006_ and ending December 31, 2006 unles~ SOOner terminated under
the provisions hereinaila specified.
5. Independent Contra.tor, Cont=tor and City agree that Contractor is an
independent contractor with re.sp..."Ct to the servi= provided pursuant (O this Agreement. Nothing in
this Agreement shaH be oonsidcre<! to create the relationship of employer and employee between the
pmies herolo. Neither Contractor nC>r any employee of Contractor shall be emitl<<J to any benefits
acrorded City employees by virtue of the services provided under this Agreement. The City shan not
be rosp<:>osibJe fOr wil\iliolding Or otherwise deducting federeI Income tax or social security or
contribUting to the State Industrial Insurance Program, or otherwise assuming thc duties of an
employer with respect to the Ccntrac!or, or any omployeo of the Contractor.
6, Indemnification. The COntraCtOr shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the
City, its offic:eN, agents and employees, rrom Md against any and all c/mms, losses or liability,
including attorney's f=, arising from injury or de1Uh to persons or damage to property occasioned by
any act, omission or failure of the Contractor, its officers, agents and employees, in performing the
work required by this ~ment With respect to the performance of this Agreement and as to
claims against the City, its office;>, agents and employees, the Contracror expressly waives its
immunity \D1derTitle 51 of the Revised Code of Washington, the Industrial Insurance Act, for injuries
to its employees, and agrees that the obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless provide<! for
in this paragraph extends to any claim brought by or on behalf of any omployee of the Cont",ctor.
This waiver is mutually negotiated by the parties. This paragraph shall nOI apply to any damage
resulting from the sole negligence of the City, its agents and employees. To the extel1t an)' of the
damages referenced by this paragraph Wcre C<!use<l by Or resulted from the COncurrent negligence of
the City, its agents or employe^", this obligation to indemnify, d.f.nd and hold hannless is valid and
enfol'Ce3b!e only to lhe extent of the negligence of the Contractor, its officers. agents, and employ=.
7. Record K.eQin" and Report\ne',
A. The Contractor shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel,
property, financial and pmgrammatic =ortis which sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and
indirect costs of any nature expended and services p"rfonned in the p"rformance of this Agreemenr
and other such records as may be deeme<l ne=sary by the City to ensure the performance of this
Agreement.
B. These r<C<Jrds shaIl be maintained for a p"riod of seve>} (7) years after
termination htrcof uniess permission to destroy them is granted by the offire of the archivist in
acrordancewirh RCW Chapter 40.t4 and by the City
02-06-'06 06 16 FFOCX1-
T-829 P03/07 U-836
8. Audits aDd IDsp~tions. The records and docum~nts \I;"ith respcc.t to all matt~rs
covc-rcd b)" this Agreeme-nt shall M. subject at all times to insp-cction, review Or audit by law during
the perfonnenc<: OfIhis Agreemenr.
9. Termination. This Agreement may at any time be tem1inated by the City giving to
the Contractor thirty (30) days \\Tittcn notico of the City's intention to ttrrninatc th~ same. Failure to
provido products on schcdut~ ma)' ft.sult in cvntract tcnnmatic>n.
10. Discrimination Prohibited. The Contractor shall not discriminate againsI an)'
employee, applicant for emplo}menr, or any person seeking the services of ule Contractor to b~
provided uncer this AgreemenI on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, sex, age, national origin,
mariraJ st1\!Us or presence of any sonsOiy, montal Dr physical handicap.
11. Assienment and SUbcoDITact. The Contractor shall nOI assign Or subcontract any
portion of the servic<s COnt<rnplated by Ihis AgreemenI withoUI Ihe writIen COnsent ofthe City
12. Entire A!!reement. This Agreement wntains the enlire i\greement between !be
parties hereto and no other Agreements, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this
Agreement. shall be d.emed to exist or bind any of the parties hereto. Ellher part)' ma)' request
chang..s in th~ agreement. Propo~M changes which are mutually agreM Upon shall be incorporatcd
by Mitten amendments to this Agreemenr.
13. No/iw. Norices to the City ofTukwHa shall be s.nt to the foUowing address:
City Clerk
City ofThkwila
6200 South center Blvd.
TukwiJa, Washington 98188
Wotices to the Contractor shall be sent to the address provided by the COntractor upon toe
signature line below
14. AnuIicabl. Law; Venue: Attornev', };"ees. This Agreement ,hall be governed by
and conSIl'Ued in acwrdance witlJ the laws of the Stato of Washington. In the event any suit,
arbitration, or other proceeding is in,tituted to enforce any te-rm of this Agreemen~ the parties
specific;Uly understand and agrc" that venue shaH be properly laid in King County, Washington. The
prevailing pari}' in any' such action shoJI be entitle" ro its alTOmey's fl>>s and costs of suit.
DATED this
day of
,20_
CITY OF TUKWILA
Mayor, Steven M. Mullet
CONTRi\.CTOR: Securitas Securit)' SeNlces _
BY:~
Title: A Vice- dent
ATI'ESTIA UJRENTICA TED:
Print<d Narr~; Georg. Stbo,ftor
Jane E. Cantu, CiviC, City Clerk
ADDRESS:12600 Se 38'" Street. Suite 205
BeUe''IIe, W ^ 98006
42~S3-1454
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Office ofthc City Att<Jmey
BY
02-06-'06 06 17 FRrn1-
T-829 P04/07 U-836
f=y.u it;;iT It
ATTACHMENT 'A'
l-ScoDe of Services to be Performed bv Contractor.
The Contractor will provide a qualified, trained individual to perform Security Services to the
Tukwila Municipal Court, This individual will be referred to as the Security Officer on Duty
The Contractor assures that each Security Officer sent to the Tukwila Municipal Court to perform
security services is free of felony pending charges or convictions, gross misdemeanor pending
charges or convictions, diagnosed mental illness, registered sex offender or has personal ties with
any "Gang' or groUp that participates in or promotes crimes against persons.
The Contractor assures that se~urity services will not be inteITUpted due to illness, absenteeism,
unexplainable unavailability, vacation, layoff or termination of the Contractor designated &curity
Officer.
The Security Officer on Duty will provide security services Monday through Friday/8:30 to 4:30
(16:30 ills).
The Security Oft1cer on Duty will be responsible for searching persons and the belongings of the
persons seeking to gain entrance to aU areas of the TukwiIa Municipal Court.
The Security Officer on Duty will not detain nor use force in the search of any person
attempting to pass through hislher the security checkpoint.
The Security Officer on Duty will deny any individual entrance to all areas of the TukwUa
Municipal Court if that individual is found to possess any of the follo\\~ng:
Guns
Knives of any size
Box Cutters-Utility Knives-Xacto Knives-RazorbIades
Pepper spray-Mace
Drugs- Marijuana, Cocaine, Mefuamphetarnines, Heroin or any non-prescription
Medication
Drug Paraphernalia-syringes, pipes ete
Brass knuckles or any device or implement capable of doing bodily harm
The Security Officer on Duty will not confiscate any of the above listed contraband.
The Security Officer on Duty will deny any individual entrance to all areas of the Tukwila
Municipal Court that appears or is determined to be:
Under the Influence of alcohol
Under the influence of drugs
Combative
Disorderly
Suggests bodily harm to another individual
Perceives to be stalking another individual
1
02-06-'06 06 17 F~1-
T-829 P05!07 U-836
2- Schedule of Services and Duties to be Perfonned bv Contractor.
The shift for the Security Officer on Duty will be:
Monday through Friday 8:30 to 4:30 (16:30brs).
A 'working lunch' will be taken from 12:0Opm to 12:3Opm.
The Security Officer on Duty will notifY Court Staffwhen relief breaks are needed. The security
checlqJQintwilI be closed for the duration of the break.
The Security Officer on Duty will grant Court accegs to all Law Enforcement and Court and City
Personnel possessing visible identification. These individuals will not be searched Of wanded.
The Security Officer on Duty will notifY Court Staff of parcel and legal messenger deliveries.
The Security Oft1cer on Duty will perform a general area security sweep of the lobby and
courtroom prior to admitting the public into any court area. Court area includes the lobby,
courtroom, hallway to the Court Clerks office, Probation Officer's office, Administrator's office
and Judge's office.
The procedures for security search will be performed as follows using courtesy and discretion in
looking through personal items:
Purses, backpacks, briefcases, diaper bags, sacks etc. are to be placed On the workstation counter
and passed to the Security Offic-er by the client. These containers will be searched prior to
allowing any individual passage through the Metal Detector Arch.
The client will walk into the Metal Detector Archway, turn sideways, then turn forward to pass
through.
The Security Officer will wand shoes.
Any individual claiming to have artificial joints such as hips, knees, spinal rods etc. must produce
medical identification prior to being granted admittance into the Tukwila Municipal Court area.
The Security Officer on Duty wm keep a Daily Activity Report (DAR) including a daily log
of all contraband bonnd and submit the DAR to the Court Administrator at the close of
business each day.
3- Euuinment Drovided bv the City of TukwiIa
Phone
Panic Alarm
Cmnera monitoring Security Station
Metal Detector Archway
Metal Detector Wand
Keys for operation of Metal Detwtor Archway
Locking Storage Bays (4)
Ergonomic Barstool Chair
Theatre Stanchions
Rubber gloves
Plastic containers for pocket contents and loose items
2 chairs for shoe removal
Limited access trash container
2
02-06-'06 06 17 FRQ~-
T-829 PG6/07 U-836
4- Uniform and Presentation of Contractor
The S.x:urity Officer is to appear in full dress uniform with a tie. The Security Officer on
Duty is to conduct themselves In a professional and courteous manner
The Security Officer will not fraternize with the public.
The Security Oft1cer will not provide legal advice.
5- City Resuonsibillties
The City ofTukwila personnel will be responsible for the locking and unlocking of aU entrance
doors.
The Municipal Court staff ,viii be responsible for dropping off, retrieving and opening mail.
The Municipal Court staffwill acc-ept package deliveries and messenger deJiveries.
The City ofTuJm.ila personnel will be responsible for turning off lights.
~
"
02-06-'06 06 18 FROM-
T-829 P07!Z7 U-836
f'?- Ui~iT '6
~
ADDENDUMlAMENDl'vIENTIRENEW AL
to
SECURITY SERVICES AGREEMEr>.'T
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC,
,
With the exception of the following changes, all of the terms and conditions of the
previously entered into Security Services Agreement remain in full force and effect and
are incorporated herein by reference.
Security Services Agreement is between Securitas Security Services USA, inc. and The City of
1\Ikwila.
Securitas Contract #
Service Location:
Tukwila Municipal Court
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, W A 98188
Servicing Office Location:
Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
l2600 38111 Street, Suite 205
Bellevue, W A 98006
Tel. (425) 653-l454 Fa.x: (425) 653.1568
The following rates would be in effect from 5/26/06 to l2l3112006:
$11.00 Wage and $16.33 Bill Rate for a new assigned Officer
$l2.00 Wage and $l7.8l Bill Rate for an Officer with over l80 Days on site
40 Hours Per Week is the Baseline Schedule
Overtime rates will be charged as incurred for all hours in excess of the Baseline Schedule at 1.5
times the Bill Rate.
City of Tukv"la
Client
Secutlta$ Security 5<lrvlCQS USA, Inc.
By: c:b-;:r Set.Nc:Y1"0
,
TItle: A lif UAs-II \ jQ /..<hM
Dale: Cf1../D0
By:
Tille:
Date:
SSA(ADDEN) - (6103)
:i} 2003 S~riw S~curit). Stl\i~ US;\, Inc.
2006 2006
Account Number Budget Line Item Appropriation Expenditures Balance as
as of 3/31106 of 3/31106
523.300.41.04 Court Security $45,000.00 4,935,34 $40,064.66
Securitas Contract
Cost of Living Increase
2006
Cost of Living Increase Budget Impact
2005 Billing Rate I 16.331 $33,966.40
2006 Billing Rate I 17.811 $37,044.80
Projected Increase
$3,078.40
Finance and Safety Committee
May 15, 2006, Conference Room #3, 5:00pm
Minutes
Present:
Pam Carter, Chair; Jim Haggerton, Vema Griffin
Rhonda Berry, Bruce Fletcher, Kimberly Walden, Trish Kinlow, Kevin
Fuhrer, Mary Miotke, Chuck Parrish, Shelley O'Keefe
~ Contract with Securitas Security Services for Court: The previous contract for court
-/" security expired December 31,2005. The new contract is essentially the same as the
previous one, except it incorporates a cost of living increase. The Judge noted that she is
very pleased with the company and the security officer that is working here. He has done
a great job dealing with the diverse clientele he experiences on a daily basis. The total
extra cost comes to $3,000 - which can be absorbed by the Court's budget. Increase
would start May 26 of this year. Contract will be identical with just the dollar difference.
Memo should be revised to incorporate changes to contract. Forward to COW with
unanimous endorsement.
Volunteer Coordinator Position: The 2006 budget provides for a 1.0 FTE
V olunteerlSpecial Events Coordinator. The V2 FTE Special Events Coordinator has
already gone through the selection process, and Bruce announced that Shannon Fisher
will fill this position. Now they are ready to move forward with the Volunteer
Coordinator position. Bruce has made proposal to Mayor's office to expand this position
from Y2 to % time. This would be paid for with salary savings this year - but would
require a budget increase in 2007 There was discussion about what this person would
accomplish - having a database of all city volunteers, spending significant time recruiting
- the committee questioned if a % time person would be enough. What would the
fmancial impact be? Bruce said it would probably be $20klyear. The committee noted
that the information memo needs to be revised to include the dollar impacts. Forward to
COW with unanimous approval.
Interlocal Agreement for cooperation in acceptance and use of Department of
Justice/Cops More Grant Funds: An interlocal agreement is proposed for cooperation
among Valley Cities in acceptance and use of a Department of Justice/Cops More Grant
allocation - the funds being earmarked for a regional wi-fi network feasibility study
Adam Smith's office was the backer for this as a regional group - thought it would be
good for economic development in the valley A selling point is to have wireless
available all up and down the valley The first phase will be public safety - second phase
for business core - third phase would be public access. The money has been secured; the
grant was given; now we need to sign the interlocal. This will not cost the City anything.
The monies will not come to us directly - will go to consultants. The monies will pay for
work being done by IT reps from various cities and possibly some consultants. Rhonda
noted that we have received Cops More dollars in the past, and Mary will find out what
we used those monies for and incorporate that into the information memo. Forward to
COW with unanimous endorsement of Committee.
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
O? VI% karat .il amNo.
PG 1 y t 1 Meaiinj Date 1 Prpar-d G; S.
I fa'er's renew I G.arrit rcair
ark, 05/22/06 1 BF ')r) tK
rsos I I I I I
1 I 1
ITEM INFORMATION
! CAS NUMBER: 06-063 I ORIGLVALAGENDA DATE: 5/22106
AGENDA ITEMTITLE Volunteer Coordinator Position
CATEGORY Discussion Motion liesolulthn Ordinance Bid Award PullicHearing Other
Attg Dan 5/22/06 clog Date 05/05/06 3fig Da:e Mtg Dote Mrs Date Affiliate Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Ma Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal PeR Polia Pik/
SPONSOR'S The Parks and Recreation Department would like to move forward with the recruitment
SUMBLARY process for a 0.75 FTE Volunteer Coordinator Position. To implement the volunteer
program it is the recommendation to increase the Council approved 0.5 FTE position to a
0.75FTE position.
REVIEWED 13Y COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F&S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 5/15/06
RECOMIMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Approve and forward to Regular Meeting
Co\LMITPF.E Approve and forward to COW
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$16,800 $30,000 $N /A
Fund Source: 2006 ADPOTED BUDGET (SALARY WAGES)
Comments: No additional expenditure in 2006; 0.25 FTE increase in 2007 will require $17,000 benefits.
MTG. DATE 1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
1
MTG.DATE1 ATTACHMENTS J
5/15/06 I Memo from Bruce Fletcher dated 5/11/06
Finance and Safety minutes dated 5/15/06
i 1
I I
I I
I I
I I
~
~,,"HLA. v'-
J! .(".~~.JU'~~
:;6j ~ :Z~
~~!~'''I;~' ~Q~
;.-. <; "./1,'1 "- _ :0',.
~Uh - ,..-- ! ;i
~ytfl
.'i:...--~<~~
1908
Parks and Recreation Department
Bruce Fletcher, DIrector
MEMORANDUM
TO'
Mayor Mullet
Finance and Safety Committee , iJ -r?,!'lO-
L.{;>~ ~---0Z
Bruce Fletcher, Director of Parks and Recreation
Rhonda Berry, City Administrator
Viki Jessop, Director of Administrative Services
Kevin Fuhrer, Director of Finance
May 11, 2006
Volunteer Coordinator (memo revised as of May 16,2006)
FROM:
CC:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ISSUE
The Parks and Recreation Department would like to move forward with the recruitment process for
the 0.75 FTE Volunteer Coordinator position.
BACKGROUND
The 2006 Budget included appropriations for a 1.0 FTE Volunteer/Special Events Coordinator
position (0.5 FTE Volunteer Coordinator/0.5 FTE Special Events Coordinator). The responsibilities of
this new position(s) include reimplementation of the City's volunteer program as well as the
coordination of new and current special events within the City
The Parks and Recreation Department has developed an implementation process for the
recruitment of these positions that has been reviewed and approved by the Administrative Services
Director, Finance Director and Mayor's Office. The 0.5 FTE Special Events Coordinator position is
currently in the selection process; an internal recruitment has been conducted and a tentative
candidate offer is forthcoming.
In the processes of identifying the position responsibilities of the 0.5 FTE Volunteer Coordinator
position, the broader vision includes community outreach, work with Tukwila service organizations
(Rotary and Tukwila Children's Foundation), businesses and nonprofits, as well as individuals. Other
volunteer partnerships may include the Tukwila Community Schools Collaboration and the school
district.
Additionally, the Parks and Recreation Department desires for this position to create a large bank of
volunteers, individual as well as organizations, which are interested in giving back to the community
A large database including an inventory of volunteers' skills, abilities and interests will be developed
to track volunteer service, evaluate efforts and recognize accomplishments. Potential volunteers will
go through a screening process and background checking.
RECOMMENDATION
It does not appear that the current 0.5 FTE Volunteer Coordinator position will allow for appropriate
time and opportunity to accomplish the expanded vision of this position. Staff recommends a 0.25
FTE increase in the position (bringing the Volunteer Coordinator position to a total of 0.75 FTE) in
order to carry out these responsibilities. This position is classified as a Program Coordinator with a
pay range at C42. The increased 0.25 FTE would be paid for by the 2006 salary savings, but would
require an increase of approximately $17,000 plus benefits in the 2007 Budget.
Finance and Safety C01IlI1l1ttee
May l5, 2006, Conference Room #3, 5:00pm
Minutes
Present:
Pam Carter, Chair; Jim Haggerton; Verna Griffin
Rhonda Berry, Bruce Fletcher, Kimberly Walden, Trish Kinlow, Kevin
Fuhrer, Mary Miotke, Chuck Parrish, Shelley O'Keefe
Contract with Securitas Security Services for Court: The previous contract for court
security expired December 31,2005. The new contract is essentially the same as the
previous one, except it incorporates a cost of living increase. The Judge noted that she is
very pleased with the company and the security officer that is working here. He has done
a great job dealing with the diverse clientele he experiences on a daily basis. The total
extra cost comes to $3,000 - which can be absorbed by the Court's budget. Increase
would start May 26 of this year. Contract will be identical with just the dollar difference.
Memo should be revised to incorporate changes to contract. Forward to COW with
unanimous endorsement.
;y;- Volunteer Coordinator Position: The 2006 budget provides for a 1.0 FTE
V olunteerlSpecial Events Coordinator. The V2 FTE Special Events Coordinator has
already gone through the selection process, and Bruce announced that Shannon Fisher
will fill this position. Now they are ready to move forward with the Volunteer
Coordinator position. Bruce has made proposal to Mayor's office to expand this position
from 'h to % time. This would be paid for with salary savings this year - but would
require a budget increase in 2007 There was discussion about what this person would
accomplish - having a database of all city volunteers, spending significant time recruiting
- the committee questioned if a % time person would be enough. What would the
financial impact be? Bruce said it would probably be $20klyear. The committee noted
that the information memo needs to be revised to include the dollar impacts. Forward to
COW with unanimous approval.
Interlocal Agreement for cooperation in acceptance and use of Department of
Justice/Cops More Grant Funds: An interlocal agreement is proposed for cooperation
among Valley Cities in acceptance and use of a Department of Justice/Cops More Grant
allocation - the funds being earmarked for a regional wi-fi network feasibility study
Adam Smith's office was the backer for this as a regional group - thought it would be
good for economic development in the valley A selling point is to have wireless
available all up and down the valley The first phase will be public safety - second phase
for business core - third phase would be public access. The money has been secured; the
grant was given; now we need to sign the interIocal. This will not cost the City anything.
The monies will not come to us directly - will go to consultants. The monies will pay for
work being done by IT reps from various cities and possibly some consultants. Rhonda
noted that we have received Cops More dollars in the past, and Mary will find out what
we used those monies for and incorporate that into the information memo. Forward to
COW with unanimous endorsement of Committee.
tt_A N COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
e J
(Di Iritialr Item No.
b G O 1 l Meeti, g Date 1 Prepared by l Mayor''reeii 1 ;er.:6l rsz;✓ 1
W i I 05/22/06 I Ps I,t.� I�.1
rsoa
I I I I I
ITEM INFORMATION
CaS NumBER: 06-064 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 5/22/05
AGENDA ITEM TrrLE Interlocal Agreement for Hearing Examiner Services
CATEGORY Discussion Motion ha Ordinance Bid Award Public Heating Otu''r
M(g Date 5 /22/06 lBg Date 06/05/06 Mfg Date Aft1 Date \Ug Date .lUg Dete Mg De:e
I SPONSOR Council Mayor Adin Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P &R Police ply
SPONSOR'S The City of Tukwila's interlocal agreement with the City of Seattle for Hearing Examiner
SUMMARY services is up for renewal. This proposed agreement renews the agreement for two years
with some minor modifications.
REVIEWED BY COW Aftg. CA &P Cmte FRS Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning g Comm.
DATE: 5/9/06
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMEN'. Forward to Council meeting for approval
COMMITTEE Forward to COW meeting
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGE IED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$5,000.00
Fund Source: MAYOR /HEARING EXAMINER: 513.100.49.53
Comments:
I MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
I I
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
05/22/06 f Staff report (to CA&P Cmte) from Peter Beckwith dated 5/3/06
Proposed agreement with and without track changes
Minutes from CA &P Cmte dated 5/9106
I I
f I f
KENYON DrSEND, PLLC
THE Afm.7CIPALL-l w FE..}.!
11 FRO"T STREET SOUTH
ISSAQGAH, WASfIDlGTON 98027-3820
WVl\V.KENYONDIsEsD.cm',I
(425) 392-7090 . (206) 628-9059
FAX (425) 392-7071
PETER B. BEC<,WITH
THO'.L~S J GUILFOIL
RENEE G. W~LLS
JOSEPH B. LEVA-,
KARl L. S..\SD
;\IO"IC.~ A, Bue<
KATHRr::: J HARDY
l\lICHAEL R. KE..~YO~
BRUCE L. DISEND
S~-\';''1DR..J,. S. ~1E.~WCROFT
SHELLEY M. K.ERsLAXE
HEIDI L. BROSIUS
KERR! A. J ORGR."\'SE..'1
L-\CEY L. M-\DCHE
INFORl\IATION MEMO
To:
From:
Date:
Re:
Community Affairs aJid Parks Committee
Peter Becbvith, Assistant City Attorney
May 3, 2006
Hearing Examiner Interlocal Agreement
ISSUE
Whether the City should renew its Interlocal Agreement with the City of Seattle for Hearing
Examiner services.
BACKGROUND
The Interlocal Agreement for Hearing Examiner services that the City entered into last year is up
for renewal.
DISCUSSION
The City of Seattle is willing to continue providing the City with Hearing Examiner services but
has requested some modifications to the Interlocal Agreement. The substantive changes are as
follows. Seattle has requested an increase in its Hearing Examiner charges from $70 to $75 per
hour. Seattle has also requested comperu;ation for its travel time and experu;e. In lieu of
charging the City $75 per hour for travel, Seattle has requested a $15 flat fee and mileage
reimbursement.
Seattle has also agreed to handle the City's drug forfeiture hearings. The previous Hearing
Examiner who handled these hearings, Park Eng, resigned from his position this past year. For
these types of hearings, Seattle is requesting a one-hour minimum Hearing Examiner charge
unless the City is able to provide Seattle with 24 hours notice of the hearing cancellation. This is
due to the fact that individuals requesting this type of hearing usually do not appear.
G:\.APPS\CNYruKV"IL.\.\1.femo\~.!EMO-HEJL\Info.oo="'KD~5;03J}5 em S 1993
.)ERV~G h ASHINGTO}.:; ES INCE
Additional changes to the Interlocal Agreement have been made and appear in track changes.
RECOi\IMEl\'DATION
Authorize the Mayor to enter into an Interlocal Agreement for Hearing Examiner Services with
the City of Seattle,
Attachments: Proposed Interlocal Agreement with and v.ithout track changes.
-2-
G:\APP~.CIV\l1JKWIL.\~~e-TIW'~mm - HE llA Info,doc/KIJP:05iO};t5
L~TERLOCALAGREE~mNTBET~~ENTHE
CITY OF TUK\VILA Al'\'D THE CITY OF SEATTLE FOR
HEARING EXAi'UNER SERVICES
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEME1\TT ("Agreement") is made and entered into pursuant
to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 39.34 of the Revised Code ofWashmgton, by
and between the City of Tukwila ("Tu1..'wila") and the City of Seattle, acting through its
Office of Hearing Examiner ("Seattle"), for Tu1..",'ila's utilization of Seattle's hearing
examiner services.
WHEREAS, Tubvila is in need of the services of a hearing examiner; and
WHEREAS, Seattle has the experience, personnel, and willingness to provide hearing
. .
exanuner servIces;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and provisions herein, it is agreed by
and between Tukwila and Seattle as follows:
1 Statement of Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is for Seattle to provide
hearing examiner services to Tukwila.
2. Scope of Services. Seattle shall provide hearing examiner services and flliW
providcaccompany1ng support services for Tukwila as required by Tukwila.
TukY..ila shall be Primarily responsible to Pl'O'.ide all support se!Tices which
mclude, but are not lirnitcd to, sending out notices to aftected parties and
copying and distributing the hea11flg c:;aminor's decision.
3 Compensation. Tukwila shall pay Seattle 5+975.00 per hour for Seattle's
hearing examiner services and a S 15 flat fee for round trip travel to Tukwila.
Seattle shall not bill for travel time between Seattle and Tukwila. Seattle shall
be compensated for mileage at the cunent government reimbursement rate
(cunentlv 44.5 cents per mile). Tukwila shall pav Seattle 520.00 per hour for
anv support services requested by Tulmila. Seattle shan be reimbursed for
anv direct expenses advanced on Tukwila's behalf including mailing and
copying charges. If Seattle is required to provide any copying services in the
perfonnance of this Agreement, Tukwila shall pay Seattle $.15 per page for
the copies.
Drug asset forfeiture hearings shall have a one-hour mnmnum hearing
examiner service charge unless Tukwila notifies Seattle of the hearing
cancellation at least 4&24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing time.
4. Method of Payment. Seattle shall bill Tukwila on a monthly basis for work
perfonned. Within 30 days of receiving Seattle's invoice, Tu1.'wila shall issue
a check to Seattle for service.s rendered.
-l-
G."Citv Att(}rl1e\'~-PETEKCol!nciHmer1o...<3.1- f-Ieznng Exarnint. Au~c;;d 06.DOCF:-_\:::i3:".C:'.--::..:!? -:~:. (':::;::.~:: I:::'~~;:;:::
H::::.:.-:::::: !:\::ff"':7.~. ~\R:::':-.::::-::! ~E.DOC~:'_\p~:;Di\ 1T:":~f: .i!-:;'CQ;:..._,::'k:J;;J;':~ !!-~,.:;,:, ::..:'i7.:::~"7.::-OC
5 Scheduling: Services. Seattle's hearing examiner services shall be scheduled
on a case-by-case basis. Tukwila shall contact Seattle to schedule appropriate
dates and times.
6. Hearing Location. Hearings shall be held at Tukwila City Hall. Tu!cy;ila
Seattle shall provide the necessary recording equipment io order to record the
heario@. The hearings may be held io the day or evening as required by
Tul-wila.
7 Hearing: Decision. Hearings shall be conducted in compliance with the
Tukwila Municipal Code. Upon conclusion of the hearing, Seattle shall issue
a wTitten decision. This decision shall make findings of fact and conclusions
of law based on the Tukwila Municipal Code. The written decision shall be
issued within l5 business days of the hearing unless unusual circumstances
exist.
8. Duration. This Agreement shall take effect upon execution of the Agreement
by both parties, and the appointment of the hearing examiner by the Mayor of
Tukwila and the approval of the Tukwila City Council. Tbis Agreement shall
remain in effect for ene-two ye~ and shall be subject to renewal every year
by mutual agreement.
9 Tennination. Either party may tenninate this Agreement by giving thirty (30)
days written notice of tennination to the other party
lO. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. Seattle shall defend, indemnify, and
hold harmless Tukwila and its officers, agents, and employees rrom any and
all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any
nature whatsoever, by reason or arising out of any negligent action or
omission of Seattle, its officers, agents, and employees in relation to tbis
Agreement. Likewise, Tukwila shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless
Seattle and its officers, agents, and employees rrom any and all claims,
actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature
whatsoever, by reason or arising out of any negligent action or omission of
Tukwila, its officers, agents, and employees in relation to tbis Agreement.
Except as provided below, io the event the parties are detennined jointly liable
to any claimant or litigant, each party shall bear responsibility for its own
defense, iocluding the payment of all attorney fees and costs associated
therewith, and shall satisfy any judgment or settlement to the extent fault is
allocated to such party
Seattle does not assume liability or responsibility for, or in any way release
Tul-wila rrom, any liability or responsibility that arises, in whole or io part,
rrom the existence or effect of Tukwila's ordinances, code, policies, rules, or
regulations. If any cause, claim, or action of any kind is commenced in wbich
-2-
Go Citv AtlOrnc,,/'PETEKCo>.mcil\lrHcr~o...<ll- Hi:.2ring EX2mir:er A.......,;T!cw. 06_DOC!,,":'-~\::;:-'C:'''-T::~-''"iI:::'C::-.;:''~::'.J:::.::~z.::::~
Hz::..-:..:: .L:::....:::::- ~~""..:::::!,,~ 'Js3_~CF:"_' p;:.::'-C; ..'\Tr:r~,::1;-~~:.T:J;;~_,:"k:':;~J"~-J n~-.::::,=, E..:::m:::::-.DOC
the enforceability and/or validity of any Tubvila ordinance, code, policy, or
regulation, including its constitutionality, is at issue, Tubvila shall defend the
same at its sole cost and expense, and if judgment is entered, or damages are
awarded against Seattle, or against Seattle and Tu1.'wila jointly, Tukwila shall
promptly satisfy the same.
l2. Applicable Law This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. In the event any suit,
arbitration or other proceeding is instituted to enforce any term of this
Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be
exclusively in King County, \Vashington.
13 Administrator. No administrator is needed for this Agreement.
14. Records Retention and TransferenceMaaaer of J',eqHirin~. HolElim:. and
Disj3osffi~ of Real and Personal Pi"Oj3orty No property is nooded for this
Agreement. Seattle may retain records UP to one year rrom the date of final
disposition after which Seattle shall transfer the records to Tukwila,
15 Notices. All notices required or pennitted pursuant to this Agreement shall be
addressed as follows:
City of Seattle Office of Hearia:; E:~aminer:
City ofTukwila:
Office of Hearing Examiner
618 Seoond .',yenae, Room 1320P.O. Box 94729
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Seattle, WA 9&W498l24
Office of the City Clerk
Tubvila, WA98l88
IN \VlTI\'ESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed.
CITY OF TUKWILA
CITY OF SEATTLE
OFFICE OF HEARING EXA1vill,TER
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Dated:
Sue A. Tanner, Hearing Examiner
Dated:
Approved as to Form:
Tukwila City Attorney
~
-.)-
G.':Cii\' AtiQmc-..-PETEK-CO!...'11ciI'Inteolo..--al- H~n2: Ex:=.rr.ir:;;r A.iT~ded 06_DOC::'-~.L.:::~:'C:';-::'::: -;:::-(':::::;__:::'J?;~~.;::::::!
R:;:.-::::: ~~;::...:;-.[; ~\.._:;:~~;; e::.DOCF:'_ \p;;:'.c: .-'.T:..;~:" ~::.'c:;-;~_:t'l:::z;;:::::::~ ~~::; ~.::,,,;;::;-.D~C
r:--, r;j ,f{) ~ CJ
I"
II! .< Ii
~ j,,<" (
UJ U-,\. "
u
INTERLOCAL AGREEIHENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF TUK\VILA Ai"\'D THE CITY OF SEATTLE FOR
HEARING EXAl\III'i'ER SERVICES
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMEJ\'T ("Agreement") is made and entered into pursuant
to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 39.34 of the Revised Code of Washington, by
and between the City of Tu1..vila ('Tu1.'wiIa") and the City of Seattle, acting through its
Office of Hearing Examiner ("Seattle"), for Tu1..vila's utilization of Seattle's hearing
. .
exammer servIces.
WHEREAS, Tukwila is in need of the services of a hearing examiner; and
WHEREAS, Seattle has the experience, personnel, and willingness to provide hearing
examiner services;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the tenns and provisions herein, it is agreed by
and between Tukwila and Seattle as follows:
1. Statement ofPllIPose. The purpose of this Agreement is for Seattle to provide
hearing examiner services to Tukwila.
2. Scope of Services. Seattle shall provide hearing examiner services and
accompanying support services for Tukwila as required by Tukwila.
3 Compensation. Tubvila shall pay Seattle 87500 per hour for Seattle's
hearing examiner services and a S l5 flat fee for round trip travel to Tukwila.
Seattle shall not bill for travel time between Seattle and Tub\<ila. Seattle shall
be compensated for mileage at the current government reimbursement rate
(currently 44.5 cents per mile). Tukwila shall pay Seattle $20.00 per hour for
any support services requested by Tukwila. Seattle shall be reimbursed for
any direct expenses advanced on Tubvila's behalf including mailing and
copying charges. If Seattle is required to provide any copying services in the
performance of this Agreement, Tub\<ila shall pay Seattle S.l5 per page for
the copies.
Drug asset forfeiture hearings shall have a one-hour I!11lliD1um hearing
examiner seI\<ice charge unless Tubvila notifies Seattle of the hearing
cancellation at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing time.
4 Method of Pavment. Seattle shall bill Tubvila on a monthly basis for work
performed. Within 30 days ofreceiving Seattle's invoice, Tub,<ila shall issue
a check to Seattle for seI\'ices rendered.
5 Scheduling Services. Seattle's hearing examiner seI\<ices shall be scheduled
on a case-by-case basis. Tubvila shall contact Seattle to schedule appropriate
dates and times.
-l-
G.TiI)' Attome:y-\PETER'Councifumerlocill- Hearing Examiner A.Irended 06.00C
6. Hearing Location. Hearings shall be held at Tuk.'wila City Hall. Seattle shall
provide the necessary recording equipment in order to record the hearings.
The hearings may be held in the day or evening as required by Tubvi]a.
7 Hearing Decision. Hearings shall be conducted in compliance with the
Tukwila Municipal Code. Upon concJusion of the hearing, Seatt]e shaH issue
a wTitten decision. This decision shall make findings of fact and conclusions
of law based on the Tukwila Municipal Code. The written decision shall be
issued within 15 business days of the hearing unless unusual circumstances
exist.
8. Duration. This Agreement shall take effect upon execution of the Agreement
by both parties, and the appointment of the hearing examiner by the Mayor of
Tukwila and the approval of the Tukwila City Council. This Agreement shall
remain in effect for two years and shaH be subject to renewal by mutual
agreement.
9 Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement by giving thirty (30)
days written notice of termination to the other party
10. Indemnification and Hold Hannless. Seattle shaH defend, indemnify, and
hold harmless Tukwila and its officers, agents, and employees from any and
all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any
nature whatsoever, by reason or arising out of any negligent action or
omission of Seattle, its officers, agents, and employees in relation to this
Agreement. Likewise, Tukwila shall defend, indemnify, and hold hannless
Seattle and its officers, agents, and employees from any and all claims,
actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature
whatsoever, by reason or arising out of any negligent action or omission of
Tukwila. its officers, agents, and employees in relation to this Agreement.
Except as provided below, in the event the parties are determined jointly liable
to any cJaimant or litigant, each party shall bear responsibility for its own
defense, incJuding the payment of all attorney fees and costs associated
therewith, and shall satisfy any judgment or settlement to the extent fault is
allocated to such party
Seattle does not assume liability or responsibility for, or in any way release
Tukwila from, any liability or responsibility that arises, in whole or in part,
from the existence or effect of Tukwila's ordinances, code, policies, rules, or
regulations. If any cause, cJaim, or action of any kind is commenced in which
the enforceability and/or validity of any Tukwila ordinance, code, policy, or
regulation, including its constitutionality, is at issue, Tukwila shall defend the
same at its sole cost and expense, and if judgment is entered, or damages are
-2-
G:~City Attomey\PETER\CouncWInte-rloc.al- Hearing EX2Ininer An:-ended G6.DOC
awarded against Seattle, or against Seattle and Tukwila jointly, Tukwila shall
promptly satisfY the same.
l2. Applicable Law This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of \Vashington. In the event any suit,
arbitration or other proceeding is instituted to enforce any tenn of this
Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be
exclusively in King County, Washington.
13 Administrator. No administrator is needed for tbis Agreement.
14 Records Retention and Transference. Seattle may retain records up to one
year rrom the date of final disposition after which Seattle shall transfer the
records to Tukwila.
15 Notices. All notices required or permitted pursuant to this Agreement shall be
addressed as follows:
City of Seattle:
Office of Hearing Examiner
P O. Box 94729
Seattle, WA 98124
City of Tukwila:
Office of the City Clerk
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA98188
IN WlTI\'ESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed.
CITY OF TUK\VILA
CITY OF SEATTLE
OFFICE OF HEARlNG EXAlvITl\'ER
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Dated:
Sue A. Tanner, Hearing Examiner
Dated:
Approved as to Fonn.
Tukwila City Attorney
~
-j-
G:'.Cit)' Attomei'PETER',CounciNnterlocal. Hearing Examiner Amended 06.DOC
Community Affairs and Parks Committee
May 9, 2006
Present:
Joan Hernandez, Chair; Joe Duffie, Pamela Linder,
Steve Lancaster, Jack Pace, Sandra Whiting, Bruce Fletcher, Derek Speck, Peter
Beckwith, Kimberly Matej, Bill GOIjance, Brian Kennedy, Chuck Parrish
1. Till Artwork Update. Bill GOIjance and Brian Kennedy from the Arts Commission
presented the Art Commission's proposal for three permanent art locations on TIB. The
artist, Mara Smith, is a renowned artist who did the Tukwila Gateway carvings. The TIE
artwork consists of three separate carvings done in raw brick reflecting Tukwila's natural
beauty, one a panoramic sk~tch of Mt. Rainier, another of a heron, and another of an
Eagle in flight. The artist's process involves carving the raw brick, which takes
approximately one month, then fIring the brick and drying the brick, which takes another
month, followed by inserting the sketch into one of the panels. The Art Commission
carried over funding from the 2005 budget to complete this artwork and it is within the
budgeted amount. According to Bruce, the installation of the art work will cost another
$10,000 and will be taken from another budget. We are currently waiting for the formal
contract to be signed before work can begin. Presentation was on the agenda for
information only. No action requested at this time.
'*
2. InterIocal Agreement with City of Seattle for Hearing Examiner services. The
Interlocal Agreement with the City of Seattle for Hearing Examiner services has been in
effect for one year and will need to be renewed if Tukwila wants to continue using Seattle
for Hearing Examiner Services. Peter Beckwith presented a draft of the proposed
Interlocal Agreement with the recommendation that the agreement be renewed for two
years rather than one year. An increase of $5.00 per hour is being proposed making the
compensation $75 per hour, plus mileage and a $15 flat fee for round trip travel to
Tukwila. Also, due to the high incidents of failure-to-appear for drug forfeiture hearings,
the draft agreement contains a clause that drug asset forfeiture hearings shall have a one-
hour minimum hearing examiner service charge unless Tukwila notifies Seattle of the
hearing cancellation at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing time. DCD is the
primary consumer of these services and Steve Lancaster said his department is pleased
with the services and the fact that the hearing examiner is willing to travel to Tukwila to
conduct the hearings. Forward to CO\V with committee recommendation for
approval at the next Regular Meeting.
3. Off-site wetland mitigation program. Sandra Whiting, Urban Environmentalist,
explained the objectives of the off-site wetland mitigation program and what it will
accomplish. In cases where small wetland fIlls cannot be avoided, and where on-site
mitigation for wetland impacts is not feasible, the program would provide alternatives for
developers by identifying potential sites where they could carry out off-site wetland
mitigation. After investigating three alternatives, staff is recommending the consolidated
mitigation approach at designated sites. Consolidated mitigation would direct off-site
mitigation to designated sites where the mitigation would be carried out by the developer
under the City's supervision. After careful analysis, staff is proposing three initial sites
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
�y I „r ay _IEMNO.
I
;ul;
1 ,::1(4 49 y 1 1 Met Da
ing b Prepared by Major's r,. w C,ra,at rc few I°
f 1 04/10/06 I JM S\ 1 1
%,,4, A. 1 05/22/06 1 s�J 1
1sos I 1 I I 1
1 1 I 1 I
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER 06-039 (ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE. APRIL 10. 2006
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Subdivision Code Changes
CATEGORY Disnrsion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Alt Date 5/22/06 3Itg Date k Date Mfg Date Mt2 Da Mfg Date 6/5/06 11g Date
SPONSOR Council •IIg Adm Slit DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PIP'
SPONSOR'S Two sets of changes to the Subdivision Code have been included in the draft ordinance.
SUM?.LARY The first is a clarification of City policy regarding completion of infrastructure
improvements prior to final short plat or subdivision approval. The second implements the
Council's decision to have the Planning Commission take over as the hearing body for
subdivision preliminary plats.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F&S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Pig nfling Comm.
DATE: 3/28/06 CA&P, 4/27/06 PC
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/AMEN. Authorize Changes; Refer to public hearing 6/5/06
GIBBER Forward to COW for discussion and endorsement
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
FCPENDTTURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$0 $0 $0
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
4/10/06 1 Forward item to the next regular meeting (however PC recommendation also needed) I
5/22/06 1
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
5/22/06 Staff Memo dated May 16, 2006
PC Staff Report dated 4/12/06 with attached Draft Ordinance
1 Strikeout /Underline version of Subdivision Code Changes
Draft 4/27/06 PC Minutes
4/10/06 Information Memo dated March 22, 2006
1 TMC 17.24 with updates
1 CA&P Committee Meeting Minutes from March 28, 2006
Th'"FORMATION MEMO
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor Mullet
City Council Y. ,~
Steve Lancaster, DCD Director~
May l6, 2006
Subdivision Code Changes
To:
ISSUE
Clarification ofTMC 17.24 to more clearly defme City policy regarding installation of
infiastructure improvements.
Implementation of Planning Commission review of subdivision preliminary plats.
BACKGROUl\'D
An ordinance amending the Subdivision Code, TMC Chapter l7, to address both of the above
issues was reviewed by the Planning Commission at a public hearing on April 27, 2006. The PC
endorsed the changes and recommended that the City Council approve the changes.
DISCUSSION
See the staff report to the Planning Commission for a discussion of the changes.
RECOJHMENDATION
Hold a public hearing on the ordinance June 5th and adopt as proposed or amended.
NG
Q:'CODEA;\fND\5-22COWSubdi\'Changes.doc
-1-
\{ay 15,2006
City of TukWila
Steven kf. klullet, Mayor
Depa.rtment of Community Development
Steve Lancaster, Director
STAFF REPORT
TO THE PLAl'\'l\'ING COMMISSION
Prepared April 12, 2006
HEARING DATE.
April 27, 1006
NOTIFICATION:
Notice of Public Hearing published April 14, 2006.
FILE NUMBERS.
L05-06l Code Amendments
E06-002 SEP A Checklist
REQUEST
Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council
about the proposed amendments to the Subdivision Code.
LOCATION.
City wide
SEPA
DETERMINATION:
DNS
STAFF
Nora Gierloff, Planning Supervisor
Jim Morrow, PW Director
ATTACHMENT
A. Draft Ordinance Amending the Subdivision Code
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 . Tukwila, Washington 98188 . Phone: 206-431-3670 . Fax: 206-431.3665
BACKGROUND
Two issues are being addressed in this set of amendments to the Subdivision Code, TMC
Chapter 17 The first is that as part of their review of decision making bodies for quasi-judicial
matters the City Council chose to make subdivision preliminary plats a Type 4 decision made by
the Planning Commission rather than a Type 5 decision made by the City Council. The second
issue is a clarification of what inftastructure improvements may be bonded for completion after
fmal approval of a short plat, subdivision or binding site improvement plan.
Staff presented these issues to the Cpmmunity Affairs and Parks (CAP) Committee on March 28,
2006. The Committee discussed the' changes and chose to forward them to the City Council.
The COW discussed the changes and sent them to the PC for a recommendation.
Each proposed change is discussed below and the actual changes to the code language are shown
in draft ordinance form at Attachment A.
DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED CHANGES
Planning Commission Review of Preliminary Plats
During their review of the quasi-judicial decision making bodies the COW recommended that
subdivision preliminary plat approvals be decided by the Planning Commission as a Type 4
decision rather than by the Council as a Type 5 decision. The Planning Commission did not
consider the issue of delegating preliminary plat approvals to the Planning Commission, due to a
staff misunderstanding concerning statutory requirements for such decisions. Before passing the
ordinance making this change in the Zoning Code the COW asked staff to informally poll
Planning Commission members on this matter All members contacted supported delegation of
preliminary plat decisions to the Planning Commission.
The proposed changes to the Subdivision Code are housekeeping needed to implement the
Council's earlier decision.
Infrastructure Bonding Policy
City policy has been to require an applicant to construct any required inftastructure
improvements (roads, sewer, water, surface water drainage, street lights, sidewalks, etc.)
associated with a proposed short plat or subdivision before the approval for the final plat is
granted. The City has allowed the applicant to submit a bond for the completion of certain
improvements (final lift for the roadway, sidewalks, punch list items, etc.) and if the bond is
satisfactory, final plat approval has been granted.
At the March 7111 meeting of the Community Affairs and Parks Committee, Jvlr David Tully of
Tully Homes raised an issue of possible conflict between the City's code, specifically TMC
NG
Q='.CODEA.\fN1J>$uWi\'AmendPCDOC
-2 -
April 12, lQC6
17.24 030, and the aforementioned policy for bonding of subdivision plat improvements. Mr
Tully felt that the TMC l7.24.030 would allow him to bond for all of the actual construction
work in lieu of actually perfonnmg the work. When apprised of City policy, Mr Tully requested
a review of the code and the policy to ensure that both are in alignment.
The proposed changes to the existing language are shO\Vll at Attachment A. This clarifYing
language comes from RCW 58.l7 130 and has been endorsed by the City Attorney The City's
existing policy follows the options provided by the RCW and the proposed clarifying language
should clear up any ambiguity
REOUESTED ACTION
Hold a public hearing on these proposed changes and make a recommendation to the City
Council.
NG
Q;'.CODEA~P.<D"SuMi"Am'ndPC.DOC
-3 -
April 12, 2006
rr:,G)fi\R~
il!J ~u L~ If U
At"! ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF TMC TITLE 17,
'SUBDIVISIONS AND PLATS: TO CLARIFY ACCEPTANCE OF
INFRASTRUCTURE BONDS, AND CHANGE PRELIMINARY PLATS FROM
A TYPE 5 TO A TYPE '4 LAND USE DECISION; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, it is City policy to have all infrastructure improvements required by a
subdivision, short plat, or binding site improvement plan completed prior to finaI
approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to have the Planning Commission serve as the
hearing body for preliminary plats; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to be the appeal body for preliminary plats;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. TMC 17.14.020, Amended. TukwiIa Municipal Code Section 17.14.020,
Pre1iminary plat, is hereby amended to read as follows:
17.14.020 Preliminary plat
A. DECISION PROCESS: Applications for preliminary plat approval shall be
processed as a Type 4 decision subject to the provisions of ThIC 18.108,050.
B. APPUCATION: The following items are required, in quantities specified by
DCD, for a complete application for preliminary plat approval. Items may be waived, if
in the judgment of the DCD Director, the items are not applicable to the particular
proposaI:
1. Completed Pre1irninary Plat Application Form and fee, as identified in
TMC Chapter 18.88.
2. Completed Application Checklist.
3. A complete SEP A Checklist application if project is not exempt from SEP A.
4. Complete applications for other required land use approvals.
5. A vicinity map showing location of the site.
6. A survey prepared to the standards identified in TMC 17.04,060.
7 All existing conditions shall be delineated, Site and development plans
shall provide the follo\\wg information:
a. Owners of adjacent land and the names of any adjacent subdivisions.
C;~.Doc>~g-d&:tl:i.!:.g1'_.!ill u~'~...xcll:(..'.{SDATA'~='.S"c:Mhis:k~COC~.J:~..:JC
~G:bn5flll1:OO6
Page I of!
b. Unes marking the boundaries of the existing lot(s) (any existing lot to
be eliminated should be a dashed line and so noted),
c. Approximate names, locations, widths and dimensions of existing and
proposed public street rights-of-way and easements and private access easements~
parks and other open spacesl reservationsJ and utilities.
d. Location, floor area and setbacks of all existing structures on the site,
e. Lot area, dimensions and average widths for each lot.
f. Location of proposed new property lines and numbering of each lot.
g. Location, dimension and purpose of existing and proposed easements.
Provide recorded documents that identify the nature and extent of existing easements,
h. Location of an..) proposed dedications.
i. Existing and proposed topography at two-foot contour intervais
extending to five feet beyond project boundaries.
j. Location of any sensitive areas and sensitive area buffers (slopes 15%
or greater, wetlands or watercourses) on the site.
1<. Location, size and species of any trees located within a sensitive area
or its buffer or the shoreline zone unless none of these trees are to be removed and their
location is not likely to create undue hardship on individual lots with respect to Th!C
Chapter 18.54, 'Tree Regulations."
1. Source of water supply, method of sewage disposal, and manner of
surface runoff control.
m. Location of existing and proposed fire hydrants to serve the project.
n. Description, location and size of existing and proposed utilities, storm
drainage facilities and roads to serve the lots.
o. A survey of existing trees and vegetation with a retention/removal
pian for the preservation of significant trees and vegetation.
p. Expected location of new buildings, their driveways and finished floor
elevations.
8. Letter of water and sewer availability if the provider is other than the City
of TukwiIa.
9. Two sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents or
businesses) within 500 feet of the subdivision.
10. Items required by TMC 18.104.060 not already listed above.
C. REVIEW PROCEDURES:
1. ReIerraI to Other Offices: Upon receipt of a complete preliminary plat
application, the Department of Community Development sha1I transmit a notice of
application and one copy of the preliminary plat to each of the following offices, where
appropriate: Public Works, Building Division, Fire Department, Police Department,
King County Health Department, the appropriate school district, and each public utility
agency serving the area in which the property proposed for subdivision is located.
C:'.I).:,..--U=13 cd S$ri~..o\Il U!.<:rS\Ik>~O?'Kcll)~':\{sD.-\TA'~;S~b&-E:O:1 eo.....~Co:
XG:h:::1S!l7/2(l..'6
Page 2 of2
2, Public Notice and Public Hearing: The process for public notice, hearings,
decisions and appeals shall be as provided for Type 4 decisions as identified in TMC
Title 18, Zoning Code,
D. CRITERIA FOR PREUMINARY PLAT APPROVAL The Planning Commission
shall base its decision on an application for preIirninary plat approval on the foliowing
criteria:
1. The proposed subdivision is in conformance ,,~th the TukwiIa
Comprehensive Plan and any other City adopted plans,
2. Appropriate provisions have been made for water, storm drainage, erosion
control and sanitary sewage disposal for the subdivision that are consistent with current
standards and plans.
3. Appropriate provisions have been made for road, utilities and other
improvements that are consistent with current standards and plans.
4. Appropriate provisions have been made for dedications, easements and
reservations.
5. The design, shape and orientation of the proposed lots are appropriate to
the proposed use for which the lots are intended and are compatible with the area in
which they are located,
6. The subdivision complies with the relevant requirements of the TukwiIa
Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances, and all other relevant local regulations.
7 Appropriate provisions for maintenance of privately owned common
facilities have been made.
8. The subdivision complies with RON 58.17.110.
Section 2. TMC 17.14.050, Amended. TukwiIa Municipal Code Section 17.14.050,
'Expiration: is hereby amended to read as follows:
17.14.050 Expiration
The subdivision shall expire unless a complete application for IinaI plat approval is
submitted within five years from the date of pre1irninary plat approval. The Planning
Commission may approve one extension not to exceed one year.
Section 3. Regulations Adopted. TukwiIa Municipal Code Section 17.22, 'Purpose,"
is hereby adopted to read as follows:
17.22.010 Purpose
It is the intent to have all infrastructure improvements required by a subdivision,
short plat, binding site improvement pian, or boundary line adjustment completed
prior to IinaI approval of the proposed land action. The City realizes that there may be
instances where the completion of the improvement may not be the best course of
action, including. but not limited to: IinaI lift for the roadway, completing sidewalks
while development construction is ongoing, minor punch list items, etc. In those
instances, the Director of Public Works may accept a bond or other financial security in
lieu of the completion of the infrastructure improvements.
Section 4. TMC 17.24, Amended. TukwiIa Municipal Code Section 17.24,
"Procedures for Public Improvements: is hereby amended to read as follows:
C:1~~,;r,dSettbg>'."ill~\~'.Ke".LY.\{SD.-\TA'~\S~-i.-i=~~&.:
XG:ba smllOO6
Page 3 of3
17.24.010 Plans and permits required for public improvements
A. Approval of a preliminary plat, short plat, binding site improvement plan or
bound"'}' line adjustment shall constitute approval for the applicant to develop
construction plans and specifications, for all facilities and improvements, in substantial
conformance to the preliminary approval, design standards, and any special conditions
required by the Short Subdivision Committee, Planning Commission or City Council; to
obtain permits and complete installation for said improvements; and to prepare a finaI
plat, plans, surveys and other documents for recording,
B. Prior to installing improvements, the developer shall apply for all required
permits for those improvements. The applications shall include development plans as
specified on the application fOl1IL See TMC 11.08 and 11.12 for additional guidance on
standards and permit requirements for improvements in the public right-of-way
17.24.020 Process for installing public improvements
Improvements installed by the developer of the subdivision or short plat, either as a
requirement or of the subdividers own option, shall conform to the requirements of this
title and improvement standards, specifications, inspections and procedures as set forth
by the Department of Public Works, and shall be installed in accordance ,,~th the
following procedures:
1. Work shall not be commenced until plans have been checked for adequacy and
approved by Public Works to the extent necessary for the evaluation of the subdivision
or short plat proposal. Plans shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of
the City
2. Work shall not commence until Public Works has been notified in advance and
if work has been discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until Public
Works has been notified.
3. Public improvements shall be constructed under the inspection and to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The City may require changes in typical
sections and details if unusual conditions arise during construction to warrant the
change.
4. All underground utilities, sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in the
streets by the developer of the subdivision or short plat shall be constructed prior to the
surfacing of streets. Stubs for service connections and underground utilities and
sanitary sewers shall be placed to a length obviating the necessity for disturbing the
street improvements when surface connections are made.
5. Plans showing all improvements as built shall be filed with the City upon
completion of the improvements.
17.24.030 Improvement agreements and financial guarantees
A. REQWRED IMPROVEMENTS: Before any finaI subdivision, short plat,
binding site improvement plan or boundary line adjustment is Iinally approved, the
subdivider shall install required improvements and replace or repair any such
improvements which are damaged in the development of the subdivision. In lieu of the
completion of the actual construction of all required improvements (public and private)
and prior to the approval of a finaI plat, the Public Works Director may accept a bond in
an amount and with surety and conditions satisfactory to the Director, or other secure
method, providing for and securing to the City the actual construction and installation
of all required improvements. This is in addition to the requirements of TMC 11.08
requiring a performance bond for all work being done in the public right-of-way If the
Public Works Director accepts a bond for the completion of the work, the subdivider
C!~~Se!tmgs\.o\llU~~?'.KdI;o'.MSDATA~~\&:.dr.i,-:-c.:J.Cod:..c.x
N"Q:fi.n 5!l1/2OO(j
Page 4 of4
shall execute and file ,,~th the City an agreement guaranteeing completion of such
improvements together "lith any needed replacement or repair. The agreement shall:
1. Specify the period of time ,,~thin which all work required shall be
completed. The time for completion shall not exceed one year from the date of final
approval of the subdivision. The agreement may provide for reasonable extensions of
time for completion of work Extensions must be requested, approved by the Public
Works Director, and properly secured in advance of the required initial completion
date.
2 Require notice by the subdivider to the Public Works Director promptly
upon completion of all required improvements.
3. Provide for notice of approval or disapproval by the Public Works Director
of the improvement within a reasonable time after receiving notice of completion.
4. Require financial security to be provided by the subdivider pursuant to
TMC 17.24.030C.
5. Provide that if the subdivider fails to complete all required work within the
period specified, the City may take steps to demand performance of the developer's
obligation within a reasonable time not to exceed 90 days from the date of demand.
6. Provide that if the required improvements are not completed within that
time, the City may take action to require the subdivider forfeit the financial security
7 Provide that the City shall be entitled to recover all costs of such action
including reasonable attorney's fees.
8. Provide that following recovery of the proceeds of the financial security,
those proceeds shall be used to complete the required improvements and pay the costs
incurred.
9. Provide that should the proceeds of the financial security be insufficient for
completion of the work and payment of the costs, the City shall be entitled to recover
the deficiency from the subdivider.
B. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT: Regardless of whether all required improve-
ments are completed prior to finaI approval of any subdivision of land, as a condition of
such approval the subdivider shall execute an agreement to assure successful operation
of said improvements. See TMC 11.08.110 for details. The agreement shall:
1. Require the subdivider to post a bond or other financial security to secure
successful operation of all required improvements and fu1I performance of the
developer's maintenance obligation. Such financial security shall be effective for a two-
year period following approval of instaIIation of all required improvements.
2 Require the subdivider to perform maintenance functions on drainage
improvements for a period of time not to exceed two years from approval of their
completion or finaI plat approval, whichever is later. Such maintenance functions shall
be specified by the Public Works Director and shall be reasonably related to the burdens
that the subdivision will impose on drainage facilities during the time maintenance is
required. The City Council may agree to accept and perform maintenance of the
improvements, in which case the subdivider's obligation to perform maintenance
functions shall terminate.
3. Not relieve the subdivider of liability for the defective condition of any
required improvements discovered following the effective term of the security given.
C;t~~Settii:Jg;;1_-'i1IL'='D=>tl.op'.'<dJ}>_"5DATA'o.'~-=c:.'~O:K:=-6x
NG:ksn 5.../17/2iX}fj
Page 5 of5
4. Provide a waiver by the subdivider of all claims for damages against any
governmental authority, which may occur to the adjacent land as a result of
construction, drainage, and maintenance of the streets and other improvements.
C. PERFORMANCE B01VD' To assure full performance of the agreements
required herein, the subdivider shall provide one or more of the follovling in a form
approved by the City Attorney'
1. A surety bond executed by a surety company authorized to transact
business in the State of Washington.
2 An irrevocable letter of credit from a financial institution stating that the
money is held for the purpose of development of the stated project.
3. An assignment of account with a financial institution which holds the
money in an account until such'tirne the City signs a written release. The assignment of
account will allow the City to ,,~thdraw the funds in the event the pro\~ions of the
agreement are not met
4. A cash deposit made with the City of Tukwila.
D. Amount of Financial Security: The financial security provided shall be 150% of
the estimated cost of the improvements to be completed and all related engineering and
incidental expenses, fina1 survey monurnentation and preparation of reproducible
Mylar or electronic records in a format approved by Public Works and meeting current
Public Works drawing standards of the "as_built" improvements. The subdivider shall
provide an estimate of these costs for acceptance by the Public Works Director.
E. DeIective Work: The acceptance of improvements by the City shall not prevent
the City from making a claim against the developer for any deIective work if such is
discovered within two years after the date of completion of the work.
Section 5. TMC 17.28.010, Amended. TukwiIa Municipal Code Section 17.28.010,
Exceptions, is hereby amended to read as follows:
17.28.010 Exceptions
A. EXCEPTION CRITERIA. Exceptions from the requirements of this code may be
granted when undue hardship may be created as a result of strict compliance with the
provisions of this code. Any authorization for exception may prescribe conditions
deemed necessary or desirable for the public interest.
An exception shall not be granted unless:
1. There are special physical circumstances or conditions affecting said
property, such that the strict application of the provisions of this code would deprive
the applicant of the reasonable use or development of his land; and
2 The exception is necessary to insure such property rights and privileges as
are enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under similar circumstances; and
3. The granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to other property in the vicinity
B. PROCEDURES: An application for any exception from this code shall be
submitted in writing by the subdivider, as part of the application for short subdivision,
binding site improvement plan, or preIiminary plat. Such application shall fully state all
substantiating facts and evidence pertinent to the request.
C:'l~ end Scnb~'AI1lli=',De$kw?'Kcll/~,iSDATA'.~=~~+-'"'i'S::b.fu>>:...;:). COC:.fu=
XG.:bn 5Jl712OO6
Page6of6
1. Slwrt subdivision: A short subdivision or binding site improvement plan
exception shall be reviewed by the Short Subdi\~ion Committee in conjunction ,,~th
review of the short subdivision or binding site improvement plan application. The
decision of the Short Subdivision Committee shall be final and conclusive unless
appealed in accordance with the appeal procedure for Type 2 decisions set forth in TMC
18.108.020.
2. Preliminary plat: A pre1irninary plat exception shall be considered by the
Planning Commission at the same time the public hearing is conducted for the
pre1iminary plat.
Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 7 Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published
in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days
after passage and publication as provided by law
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a ReguIar Meeting thereof this day of .2006.
ATIESTj AUTHENTICATED:
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, Oty Oerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Filed with the City OerIe:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number:
Office of the City Attorney
C;~ttend&tri:J:i>'AlJL~~'XeLY..MSDATA'~\S'..b&.is:.;;.;lCc.:!-e.60:
KG:bn Sll7;20')6
Page 7 of7
Subdivision Ordinance StrikeoutfUnderline Version
Section 1. TWIC 17.14.020, Amended. TuJnviJa Municipal Code Section J 7 14 020,
Preliminary plat, is hereby amended to read as follows:
17.14.020 Preliminary plat
A. DECISION PROCESS: Applications for
preliminary plat approval shall be processed as Type ~ decision subject to the provisions of
TMC l8.108.0~.
B. APPLICATION- The following items are required, in quantities specified by DCD, for a
complete applieation for preliminary sheff-plat approval. Items may be waived if in the judgment
ofthe DCD Director the items are not applicable to the particular proposal:
I Completed Preliminary Plat Application Fonn and fee as identified in TWIC Chapter 18.88.
2. Completed Applieation Checklist.
3. A complete SEP A Checklist application if project is not exempt tram SEP A.
4 Complete applieations for other required land use approvals.
5. A vicinity map showing location of the site.
6. A survey prepared to the standards identified in TMC 17.04.060.
7 All existing conditions shall be delineated. Site and development plans shall provide the
following infonnation:
a. Owners of adjacent land and the names of any adjacent subdivisions.
b. Lines marking the boundaries of the existing lot(s) (any existing lot to be eliminated
should be a dashed line and so noted).
c. Approximate names, locations, widths and dimensions of existing and proposed, public
street rights-of-way and easements and private access easements, parks and other open
spaces, reservations, and utilities.
d. Location, floor area and setbacks of all existing structures on the site.
e. Lot area, dimensions and average widths for each lot.
f. Location of proposed new property lines and numbering of each lot.
g. Location, dimension and purpose of existing and proposed easements. Provide
recorded documents which identify the nature and extent of existing easements.
h. Location of any proposed dedieations.
i. Existing and proposed topography at two foot contour intervals extending to five feet
beyond project boundaries.
j. Location of any sensitive areas and sensitive area buffers (slopes ~15% or greater,
wetlands or watercourses) on the site.
k. Location, size and species of any trees loeated within a sensitive area or its buffer or
the
shoreline zone unless none of these trees are to be removed and their location is not likely
to create undue hardship on individual lots with respect to TWIC Chapter 18.54, Tree
Regulations.
\. Source of water supply, method of sewage disposal, and manner of surface runoff
control.
m. Location of existing and proposed fire hydrants to serve the project.
n. Description, location and size of existing and proposed utilities, storm drainage
facilities
KG Page I of6
C:'DOCU~ffi-l \.kel1r-n\LOCAl.S-l\Temp\Sl.i13DIV-I.DOC
May 18,2006
and roads to serve the lots.
o. A survey of existing trees and vegetation with a retention/removal plan for the
preservation of significant trees and vegetation,
p. Expected location of new buildings, their driveways and finished floor elevations.
8. Letter of water and sewer availability ifthe provider is other than the City ofTukwila.
9 Kin; Cennty ;\S3cssor's n1ap' which show the locat;en sf each property v..;th;n SOO feet sf
tfle subdiyisien; threeTwo sets of mailing labels for all property owners and tenants (residents
or businesses) within 500 feet of the subdivision.
10. Items required by TMC 18.104.060 not already listed above.
C. REVIEW PROCEDURES.
I Referral to Other Offices: Upon receipt of a complete preliminary plat application, the
Department of Community Development shall transmit a notice of application and one copy
of the preliminary plat to each I'fthe following offices, where appropriate: Public Works,
Building Division, Fire Depanment, Police Department, King County Health Department, the
appropriate school district, and each public utility agency serving the area in which the
property proposed for subdivision is located.
2. Public Notice and Public Hearing: The process for public notice, hearings, decisions and
appeals shall be as provided for Type 1!> decisions as identified in TMC Title 18, Zoning
Code.
D CRITERIA FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPROVAL. The Planning Commission Cit:,. Calmc;1 shall base its decision on an application for
preliminary plat approval on the following criteria:
1. The proposed subdivision is in confonnance with the Tubvila Comprehensive Plan
and any other City adopted plans.
2. Appropriate provisions have been made for water, stonn drainage, erosion control and
sanitary sewage disposal for the subdivision which are consistent with current standards and
plans.
3 Appropriate provisions have been made for road, utilities and other improvements which
are consistent with current standards and plans,
4 Appropriate provisions have been made for dedications, easements and reservations.
5. The design, shape and orientation ofthe proposed lots are appropriate to the proposed use
for which the lots are intended and are compatible with the are-a in which they are located.
6. The subdivision complies with the relevant requirements of the Tubvila Subdivision and
Zoning Ordinances, and all other relevant local regulations.
7 Appropriate provisions for maintenance of privately owned common facilities have been
made.
8. The subdivision complies with RCW 58.17 110.
Section 2. TMC 17.14.050, Amended. Tukwila Municipal Code Section 17 14050,
Expiration, is hereby amended to read as follows:
17.14.050 Expiration
The subdivision shall expire unless a complete application for final plat approval is submitted
within five ye-ars from the date of preliminary plat approval. The Planning Commission Gity
Council may approve one extension not to exceed one year
Section 3. A new section, Th1C 17.24.010 is created to read as follows:
17.24.010 Purpose
It is the intent to have all infiastmcture improvements required bv a subdivision. short
plat. binding site improvement plan. or boundarv line adiustment completed Prior to final
NG Page 2 of6
C:\DOClThIE-llkelly-niLOCALS-I\TempISUBDIV-I.DOC
May 18,2006
approval of the pl'Oposed land action. The City realizes thar there mav be instances where
the completion of the improvement may not be the best course of action. includim!, but
not limited to. final lift for the roadway, completing sidewalks while development
construction IS ongoing, minor punch list items. etc. In those instances. the Director of
Public \VorJes may accept a bond or other financial secuntv in lieu of the completion of
the infrastructure improvements.
Section 4. TMC 17.24.010, Amended. Tuh.'wila Ivlunicipal Code Section l7.24 020,
Plans and permits required for public improvements, is hereby amended to read as follows:
17.24.0~l-O Plans and permits required for public improvements
A. Approval of a preliminary plat, short plat, binding site improvement plan or boundary line
adjustment shall constitute approval for the applicant to develop construction plans and
specifications, for all facilities and improvements, in substantial conformance to the preliminary
approval, design standards, and any special conditions required by the Short Subdivision .
Committee. Planning Commission or City Council; to obtain permits and complete installation
for said improvements; and to prepare a final plat, plans, surveys and other documents for
recording.
B. Prior to installing improvements, the developer shall apply for all required permits for those
improvements. The applications shall include development plans as specified on the application
form. See TMC I 1.08 and II. I 2 for additional guidance on standards and permit
requirements for improvements In lhe public right-or.wav.
Section 5. TMC 17.24.020, Amended. Tuh.".vila i\-funicipal Code Section l7.24.030,
Process for installing public improvements, is hereby amended to read as follows:
17.24.030 Process for installing public improvements
Improvements installed by the developer of the subdivision or short plat, either as a
requirement or of the subdividers own option, shall confonn to the requirements of this title
and improvement standards, specifications, inspections and procedures as set forth by the
Department of Public \Vorks, and shall be installed in accordance with the following
procedures:
I Work shall not be commenced until plans have been checked for adequacy and
approved by Public Works to the extent necessary for the evaluation of the subdivision or short
plat proposal. The pla"s may se require" sefore appreyal of the fiual plat, if improyemeRt3 are te
be defcrrer!. Plans shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements ofthe City
2. Work shall not commence until PubJic Works has been notified in advance and if
work has been discontinued for any reason, it shall not be resumed until Public Works has been
notified.
3 Public improvements shall be constructed under the inspection and to the satisfaction
ofthe Director of Public Works. The City may require changes in typical sections and details if
unusual conditions arise during construction to warrant the change.
4 All underground utilities, sanitary sewers and storm drains installed in the streets by
the developer of the subdivision or short plat shall be constructed prior to the surfacing of streets.
Stubs for service connections and underground utilities and sanitary sewers shall be placed to a
length obviating the necessity for disturbing the street improvements when surface connections
are made.
5 Plans showing all improvements as built shall be filed with the City upon completion
of the improvements.
NO Page3of6
C:\DOCU~1E~ 1 \kelly-n\LOCALS-l\Temp\SUBDIV-l.OOC
~fay 18,2006
Section 6. TMC 17.24.030, Amended. Tub\ila Ivlunicipal Code Section 17.24.040,
Improvement agreements and financial guarantees, is hereby amended to read as follows:
17.24 040 Improvement agreements and financial guarantees
A. REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS - Before any final subdivision, short plat, binding site
improvement plan or boundary line adjustment is finally approved, the subdivider shaH
install required improvements and replace or repair any such improvements which are
damaged in the development of the subdivision. In lieu of the completion of the actual
construction installationof al1 required improvements (public and private) and prior to the
approval of a final plat. the Public Works Director mav accept a bond In an amount and with
surety and conditions satisfactory to the Director. or other secure method. providinQ for and
securing to the City the actual construction and Instal1ation of al1 required Improvements.
This Is In addition to the requirements ofT"'IC 11.08 reQuirinQ: a perfonnance bond for all
work being done In the pubJic right-of-w'av. If the Public Works Director accepts a bond for
the completion of the work, the subdivider shall Fffi!J' execute and file with the City an
agreement guaranteeing completion of such improvements together with any needed
replacement or repair. The agreement shal1:
1 Specify the period of time within which all work required shal1 be completed, The
time for completion shall not exceed one year from the date of final approval ofthe subdivision.
The agreement may provide for reasonable extensions of time for completion of work.
Extensions must be requested, approved by the Public Works Director City COllncil, and properly
secured in advance of the required initial completion date.
2. Require notice by the subdivider to the Public Works Director promptly upon
completion of all required improvements.
3 Provide for notice of approval or disapproval by the Public Works Director of the
improvement within a reasonable time after receiving notice of CQmpJetion,
4. Require financial security to be provided by the subdivider pursuant to TMC
l7.24.030C.
5 Provide that if the subdivider fails to complete all required work within the period
specified, the City may take steps to demand perfonnance of the developer s obligation within a
reasonable time not to exceed 90 days trom the date of demand.
6. Provide that if the required improvements are not completed within that time, the
City may take action to require the subdivider forfeit the f'mancial security
7 Provide that the City shaH be entitled to recover all costs of such action including
reasonable attorney's fees.
8. Provide that following recovery of the proceeds of the financial security, those
proceeds shall be used to complete the required improvements and pay the costs incurred.
9 Provide that should the proceeds of the financial security be insufficient for
completion of the work and payment of the costs, the City shall be entitled to recover the
deficiency trom the subdivider.
B. ,1"fAINTENANCEAGREE}JENT - Regardless of whether all required improvements are
completed prior to final approval of any subdivision of land, as a condition of such approval
the subdivider shall execute an agreement to assure successful operation of said
improvements. See TMC 11.08.] 10 for details. The agreement shall:
I Require the subdivider to post a bond or other financial security to secure successful
operation of all required improvements and full performance of the developer s maintenance
obligation. Such fmancial security shall be effective for a two-year period following approval of
installation of all required improvements.
2. Require the subdivider to perform maintenance functions on drainage improvements
for a period of time not to exceed two years from approval of their completion or final plat
NG Page4of6
C:\DOCtThlE-I\kelly-n\LOCALS-1ITemp\SUBDIV-I.DOC
\fay IS, 2Q06
approval, whichever is later. Such maintenance functions shall be specified by the Public Works
Director and shall be reasonably related to the burdens which the subdivision will impose on
drainage facilities during the time maintenance is required. The City Council may agree to accept
and perform maintenance of the improvements, in which case the subdivider s obligation to
perfoon maintenance functions shall teoninate.
3 Not relieve the subdivider of liability for the defective condition of any required
improvements discovered following the effective teon of the security given.
4. Provide a waiver by the subdivider of all claims for damages against any
governmental authority which may occur to the adjacent land as a result of construction. draina!!e
and maintenance of the streets and other improvements. . -
C. PERFOR,1,-fANCE BOND - To assure full perfonnance of the agreements required herein,
the subdivider shall provide one or more ofthe following in a fonn approved by the City
Attorney'
I A surety bond executed by a surety company authorized to transact business in the
State of \V ashington,
2. An irrevocable letter of credir from a fmancial institution stating that lhe money is
held for the purpose of development of the stated project.
3 An assignment of account with a financial institution which holds the money in an
account until such time the City signs a written release. The assignment of account will allow the
City to withdraw the funds in the event the provisions of the agreement are not met,
4. A cash deposit made with the City of Tub vila.
D Amount of Financial Security' The financial security provided shall be 150% of the
estimated cost of the improvements to be completed and all related engineering and
incidental expenses, fInal survey monumentation and preparation of reproducible mylar or
electronic records in a fonnat approved by Public Works and meeting current Public Works
drawing standards of the "as-built" impro\'ements. The subdivider shall provide an estimate
of these costs for acceptance by the Public Warks Director
E. Defective Work: The acceptance of improvements by the City shall not prevent the
City from making a claim against the developer for any defective work if such is discovered
within two years after the date of completion ofthe work.
Section 7. TMC 17.28.010, Amended. Tu1.'wiIa Municipal Code Section 17.28.010,
Exceptions, is hereby amended to read as follows:
17.28.010 Exceptions
A. EXCEPTION CRITERIA. Exceptions from the requirements ofthis code may be granted when
undue hardship may be created as a result of strict compliance with the provisions of this code,
Any authorization for exception may prescribe conditions deemed necessary or desirable for the
public interest.
An exception shall not be granted unless:
I There are special physical circumstances or conditions affecting said property, such that
the strict application of the provisions of this code would deprive the applicant of the
reasonable use or development of his land; and
2. The exception is necessary to insure such property rights and privileges as are enjoyed by
other
properties in the vicinity and under similar circumstances; and
3. The granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other
property in the vicinity
KG Page 5 of6
C:\DOCU~fE-l\kelly-n\LOCAI.S-l \Temp\SUBDIV~I.DOC
May 18. 2C06
B. PROCEDURES. An application for any exception from this code shall be submitted in writing
by the subdivider, as part of the application for short subdivision, binding site improvement plan,
or preliminary plat. Such application shall fully state all substantiating facts and evidence
pertinent to the request.
I Short subdivision. A short subdivision or binding site improvement plan exception shall be
reviewed by the Short Subdivision Committee in conjunction with review ofthe short
subdivision or binding site improvement plan application. The decision of the Short
Subdivision Committee shall be final and conclusive unless appealed in accordance with the
appeal procedure for Type 2 decisions set forth in Tj'vlC 18.108.020.
2. Preliminary plat: A preliminary plat exception shall be considered by the Planning
Commission City CSBneil at the same time the public hearing is conducted for the
preliminary plat. The decisioR ofthe Cit'o' CouRcil shall b~ (.nal and conclusi';e.
NG Page 6 or6
ODOCU'!E_I\~elly_n\LOCALS_l\Temp\5UBDlV-l.DOC
~fay 18.2006
DRAFT
PLAJ.'\'NIl~G COlVIMISSION
PUBLIC HEARING MI]\T{JTES
APRIL 27, 2006
The Public Hearing was called to order by Chair Ekberg at 7:00 PM
Present:
Chair, Allan Ekberg, Commissioners, Bill Arthur, Hemy Marvin, Lynn
Peterson, and Chuck Parrish.
Absent:
Vice Chair, George Malina and Commissioner Margaret Bratcher
Representing
City Staff:
Steve Lancaster, Nora Gierloff, and Wynetta Bivens
CO;\Il\USSIOl'o'ER PARRISH MADE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE PUBLIC HEARING
.MTh'UTES FROM ;\IARCH 23, 2006. CO;\Il\IISSIOl'o'ER ~IARVIN SECONDED THE
MOTION; THE MOTION WAS UNAi,\'IMOUSLY APPROVED.
Chair Ekberg swore in those wishing to give public testimony
LOCATION:
L05-061
City ofTukwila
Subdivision Code changes clarifying inITastructure bonding policy
and making the Planning Commission the decision making body for
preliminary plats.
City "ide
CASE NillvIBER.
APPUCAl'IT
REQUEST
Nora Gierloff, Planning Manager, Department of Community Development, gave the
presentation for staff. Ms. Giedoff provided some background on proceedings from 2005
regarding re-examining the decision making bodies for quasi judicial appeals. There was a
misunderstanding whether the City Council was allowed by State law to delegate Preliminary
Plats or Sub-divisions to be heard by the Planning Commission instead of the City Council. After
further research is was determined the delegation could be allowed. Staff is returning to the
Planning Commission to request implementation of the proposed delegation. The implementation
of this change would allow administrative appeals to be heard by the City Council.
Ms. Gierloff also provided information on the City policy for infrastructure construction during
the sub-dhision process. The issue is what percentage of infrastructure can be bonded versus
constructed. The proposed change would clarify the City's position that only minor items may be
bonded for completion after final plat approval.
Staff is requesting that a public hearing be held on the proposed changes and that the Planning
Commission forward a recommendation to the City Council.
Planning Commis.:.ion
April 27. 2006
Page 2 of2
There were no public comments
REBUTIAL: None.
There were no further comments.
The Public Hearing was closed.
The Planning Commission Deliberated.
COM;VIISSIOl\'ER PARRISH MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE STAFF'S
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 'THE PROPOSED A,\IEi'o'D;VIEi'o'TS ON THE SUB-
DIVISION CODE A,'lD TO FORWARD THEM TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
COM;VIISSIONER EKBERG SECOi'o'DED THE MOTION. ALL VOTED IN FAVOR.
Snbmitted By:
\Vynetta Bivens
Secretary
Tentative Agenda Schedule
MONTH MEETING 1 - MEETING 2 - MEETING 3 - MEETING 4 -
REGULAR C.O.W. REGULAR c.O.W.
May 1 8 15 22
29'"-
Memorial Day See agenda packet
(City offices closed) cover sheet for this
(also 5th Monday- 'weekls agenda
no Council meeting (May ??, 2006
scheduled) Committee of the
Whole meeting),
CO~!MITIEE OF THE
WHOLE 1viEEIL'-'G TO BE
FOLLOWED BY A Sl'ECI-'.L
MEETEG
June 5 12 19 26
Special Presentation: Special Presentation:
Update on the 1-405 uThe Health of King
Corridor Program (as Countyu
it relates to Tukwila) (Julin Patterson, King
Unfinished Business: Cml1lh) Cmmal)
Revision to the Code Special Issues:
of Ethics Resolution regarding
the Off-site Wetland
I....Iitigation Program
July 3 10 17 24
4'"_
Independence Day CO~ThITITEE OF THE
(City offices closed)
WHOLE MEETEG TO BE
31st - FOLLOWED BY A SPECIAL
Fifth Monday of the MEETIKG
month-no Council
meeting scheduled
Upcoming Meetings & Events
MAY & JUNE 2006
I 23rd (Tuesday)
I". Ca::-'="l'li:::
.\ffak-.: &. "?&f.;.:;
I 24th (WednesdaY)
I Apartment ~1angers
i Xernorking Meeting
f 25th (Thursday) f 26th (Friday)
I :> OPE:\" HOL'SE '"
I Informario;1al
27th (Saturday)
Highwa)" 99
22nd (.\londav)
I ,. T ransportarion
Crnte.
5:00PM Gm;o , 12:00 to 1:00 P!,t rash Pickup Day
I meeting abour
(CR #/j CA.....CElllD Mee-tingatTon-IJ~& : CIllRnship das~~ 9:00 - IO:OG .-\.\1 I
! For !c,.:;al,on call
Country Suites in Tu...........\ila... I DOTJ;!lQ!
~ City Council PUBLIC l\IEETU'iG (1-:8&'] IrJU'..iTc"2I1 A~-",- S-J Meet ct 6:30 P!.t in I I
Committ~e of 1-405 Corridor th~ libf21}'2.t Foster I 206-],;]-5556
tho;: \V'nole Program: Tu1.'\\ila FAR:.''IERS MARKET High School I I
Mtg., to Renion Seoping Corr<<:TofU-tthSL ara (4241S. /44fhSl) / " I
7:00p.M Meeting TuJ:uila bit 'I. Bf>..d. CclI2Q6-.t.33-1800 ,
(Cow,.cil Co solid! public Every Wednesda)- for ffi()re into1'r122.<1oEl. ~41 I
Chambers) COfl11r,ents regarding (now through Sept 27) Sparu<>rC'd b., t~.z
(c.o.w. environ-m~ntal issues 3:00 to 7:00 P:'>I C!l)'ofTu.bda s I
MEEITSG TO BE 4:00 to 7:00 PM ~ Equity & Di....a-siry
~l\!EDL-\1ELY r~nH014ef(jTC"'~!j CO!':'.l"1wior: I I
I I
FOliOWED BY Renton Communit)' _Memorial Day I
A SPECIAl Center I observance: I
MfE1r<G) (17i5Y~V"'-~Jlf,oy} > Planning Three days: of I
PUBLIC MEETING Commission, I special programs
Sound Transit ~ COPCAB, 7:00p:\{ i at the 1-1useum
construction noise 6:30PM (Cour,cil of Flight
,"'ariauce ,.equ~t fCR ~j) Chmnbers) (May 27-28-29)
6:30 PM www.museumof
I (Cour..-cil Chambers) 'iiii'Court i flight.erg
29thG\londau) I 30th /TuesdaY) I 31st "\'ednesda"'} !lst-IThursday) I-2nd (Friday) ! 3rd (Saturday)
, >~ I
~IEMORUL DAY FAR'IERS MARKET
CGrr2r of /44rh Sf. and ~ I
Of)' offices closed C-em."E;-'icn ,
TukHila fnJ'!. B/yd I
EYer). Wednesday REscHEDVLED I
MrQJori21 Day TO JL~"E 81H
ceremony at the (no\'\' through Sept 27) , I
3:00 to 7:00 P:'>f I
Museum of Fligbt ~"'-~ii I I
Salute to PliBUe I
!..,:\~'" I
America's Armed '~{~j.:t~_ ]\iEETL'iG
Tuskegee Ainnen Lin.\: Light Rail I
ofWWII ~~~1Jl ;
CQnstruction I
2:00 to 3;30 PM \....y.-w.ci.tul...Vi-il~..wa.1Jsf Updzte
~ F)IIC:lT/nenmarkeLbtm 5:30 P~,f !
" , I (FO~t2T Library) i
!
>> >> May 15 through 26: Free disposal passes for Tuktrila ,.esidents 8...ailable for pickup at City HaU. ';]. I
Passes n-iJ1 be: \..wd.at Bow Lake TfMSfer Station May 19 through 29 ONLY
T
., Apartment Managers' Networking Lunch: Periodically as scheduled. CorJa':t Robbie Bwru at 206-431-2197
>- Arts Commission: 1st TUe3., 5:00 PM, Tukv.iIa Community Center. Contact K{m!;:;rly Matej aJ 206-767-2J.12.
,Chamber of Commerce's Tul....'.-ila Goyemment and Commnnit)' Affairs Committee: 1st Tues., 12:00 Noon, Chmlber Officcs.
ConJacl Narq Damon or 206..575./611.
,Chipper Da)'s, sponsored b)' tbe Wash. State Dept. of Agriculture: 3rd Sa., 10:00 ..s....\t to 1:00 P!-.{, Foster HS main par.<ing IOL
Dispose of pnmings and plant IIl3.terials &om the longhorned beetle quarantine c.rea. Dri'. e your truck1~d of ma!eria15 to the lot and
help will be pro....ided to unload. chip. and dispo5C of materials fr~e of cbErge. :& sure to bring JD \\ith quarantine area addre.is.
, City Council Committee of Wbole (C,O.W.) Meeting: 2nd & 4th Mon.. 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall.
);> City Council Regular Meeting: 1st & 3rd Mon.. 7:00 PM. Council Chambm at City Hall.
,.CMI Service Commission: 2nd ~{on., 5:00 p~t. ConE Room #3. CorJa::t Be'>-' Willison at 206-433-J84..f
? Cornmunil}. Affairs & Parks Committee: 2nd & 4th Tues., 5:00 P~t, Conf. Room #3. 5/23/06 meeting has been cane,dled
)>COPCAB (CommuDity Oriented Policing Citl:uns Ad.... Board): 4th Wed., 6:30 P~f, Conf. Rm #5. I,!arja JfW7ay (206--/33-7/75j.
):> Crime Hot Spots Task Force: 3rd Wed., 10:00 A..\f, Conf. Room #5. Contact ~f(Uja \1!UTay at 206-133-7 J 75.
,.. Domestic Violence Task Force: 3rd Thtrni., I2:00 Noon, Canr. RooIn #5. Conract E}.ie Boyj-.il12 orSta-cy HarlSe.n at 206-..133-7180.
)> Equity & Di'.'ersil}' Commission: 1st Thurs., 5:00 P~f, Sbo\\:-alter Middle Schoo] iib12I)'.
):> Finance & Safety Committee: 1st & 3rd 11on., 5:00 PM, Conr. Room #3.
,Higbwaj' 99 Action Committee: 2nd TUe$., 7:00 P.\f, Tuk\\iJa CommwtityCenter. ConlixtChiifDa....e Haynes at 206-:33-1812.
,Human Services Ad\isoT)' Brd: 2nd Fri. ofe\'en mont:hs, 10:00 A.\1. Hum2Il Set\ices Office. CorJaCl Evie Bayr..t111 ar 206-433-7180.
,. Human Sen.ices Proyiders; Qumterly. 11:30 .~'i. TCC (2006 schedule to be derennine.d). COnJacl Sta....'}' Hansen at 206-:33-7 181.
)> Library Adyisot), Board: 3rd Wed.. 1:00 PM, Foster Library. Conrad Bruce Fletcher at 206.767-2343.
}> Lodging Tax Ad...isory Committee: Every other month (or as scheduled), 12:00 ~OO~. Contact Kiltherir.e Ker~man at 206-575.2-189.
, Parks Commission: 3rd Wed., 5:30 PM, Senior Game Room at Community Cent~r. Contact Kunberly 1,latej at 206-767-1].f}.
Planning CommissionJBoard or Architectural Re,,'iew: 4th Thurs., except 2nd Thursday in Nov. & Ikc., 7:00 p~~.
Council Chambers at City Hall. Cordact ft):rceita Bivem at 206--131-3670.
, Sister City Committee; Ig Wed., 5:30 PM, Cant. Room -;;:3. Contact B?~ Willtson at 20fi...-.!33-18.f.f.
,Transportation Committ~: 2nd & 4th Mon.. 5:00 PM, Conf. Room #1. Ager.daitemsfcr 5/22/06 n;<3~ing: fA)Su--}2iu Trar~"por-
ta/ion fmprO\'ement Program (2007-2012). (Ej 2005 Overlay ar.d Repair Progra!1J project comp/eli(Jn and acap!an-:e. rc) Turnu~'2T
documents for Foster'.'iev? Esfates
, Utilities Committee: lst& 3rdTue:s., 5:00 P~1. Conf. Room #1.