HomeMy WebLinkAboutReg 2005-12-05 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET q Tukwila City Council Agenda
RD: REGULAR MEETING
I Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Councilmembers: Joe Duffie Joan Hernandez
f Rhonda Berry, City Administrator Pam Carter Jim Haggerton
i Pamela Linder, Council President Dennis Robertson Dave Fenton
December 5, 2005; 7:00 PM Ord #2108 Res #1597
1. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL
2. SPECIAL Report from BuRSST (Burien, Renton, SeaTac, Skyway and Tukwila),
PRESENTATIONS m association with Northwest Area Foundation:
Bill Hopper and Caren Adams.
3. APPOINTMENTS Appointment to the Lodging Tax Advisory Board:
Craig O'Neill (fills Bill Hayes' unexpired term).
Appointment to the Civil Service Commission:
Anna Bernhard; term expires 12 -31 -11 (reappointment).
Appointments to the Library Advisory Board:
Mac McDonald, Pos. #3; term expires 12 -31 -07 (reappointment).
Sue King, Pos. #4; term expires 12 -31 -07 (reappointment).
Steve Schneider, Pos. #5; term expires 12 -31 -07 (reappointment)
4. CITIZEN At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included on
COMMENT this agenda. To comment on an item listed on this agenda, please
save your comments until the issue is presented for discussion.
5. CONSENT a. Approval of Minutes: 11 -21 -05 (Regular) and 8 -29 -05 (Special).
AGENDA b. Approval of Vouchers.
6. PUBLIC HEARING Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element Amendments.
1 Please bring your bound Transportation Plan document.
7. UNFINISHED a. An ordinance amending the Transportation Element of the
BUSINESS Comprehensive Plan (see public hearing, item 6 above)
(Note: Action may b. An ordinance adopting the Proposed 2006 Budget.
be taken on each c. A resolution approving the Proposed 2006 -2011 Financial
of these.itezns.) Planning Model and Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
8. NEW BUSINESS a. Proposed lease agreement with the Way Back Inn for Foster
House, 14239 42nd Avenue South.
(Note: Action may b. An ordinance regarding Concurrency Management.
be taken on each c. An ordinance regarding Transportation Concurrency Standards
of these items.) and Impact Fees.
d. An ordinance amending the 2005 Budget.
9. REPORTS a. Mayor c. Staff e. Intergovernmental
b. City Council d. City Attorney
10. MISCELLANEOUS
11. EXECUTIVE SESSION
12. ADJOURNMENT
Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible.
Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice to the
City Clerks Office 206 433 1800 /'1'JD 206 248 2933. This notice is available at www.ci.tukwila.wa.us
and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities.
Tukwila Council meetings are audio taped.
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
s bands ITEM No.
Q P1� I tbfc�ttrrgDate P>rJlniEfll7y 1 ill awls i2ZZe W Cotrixtl it�ze�u
o
'I a' emu/ 1 12/05/05 I so' 1 1 r L
='�c 1 I r 1
'9oa 1
1 1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER 05-158 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: DECEMBER 5, 2005 1
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Appointment to Lodging Tax Advisory Committee; Reappointments to Civil Service
Commission and Library Advisory Board
CATEGORY Dasarsswn Motion Resdutwn [1 Ordinanx Bu Alenrd Public He,,, u i Ocher
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
1 SPONSOR Carnal Mayor AdmSus DCD f l Firma. Fut. Legal P6 R Pdue PW 1
SPONSOR'S Appointment of Craig O'Neill to Lodging Tax Advisory Board.
SUMMARY
Reappointments: Civil Service Commission Position #2, Anna Bernhard term expires
12/31/2011. Library Advisory Board Position #3, Mac McDonald; Position #4, Sue King
and Position #5, Steve Schneider all three terms expire 12/31/2007.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA&P Cante F&S Cmte Transportation Cmte
f] Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm
DATE:
RE COMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADMIN. Confirm appointment /reappointments.
COMMITTEE
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source.
Comments
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
12/05/05 1
I
MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS
12/05/05 1 Memo from Mayor to Council dated 11/17/2005.
1 1
1 i
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard. Tukwila, Washington 98188
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Date:
City Council
Mayor Mullet <;;;.....\1...." '"
Appomtment to Lodging Tax Advisory Board, Reappomtments to CIVIl SerVice
CommISSIOn and Library AdvIsory Board
November 17,2005
To'
From.
Re:
I am pleased to forward to you the applIcatIOn of Craig O'NeIll. Mr O'Neill IS the current
Director of Marketing and Sales for the Museum of FlIght. He will fill the vacancy created when
BIll Hayes left the Museum.
vVe also have a number of people to reappomt. Anna Bernhard's term on the CIVIl Service
CommisSIOn expires 12/31/2005. She would like to be reappomted, her new 6-year term will
expire 12/31/2011. On the Library AdvISOry Board we have three terms expmng: PosItIOn #3 -
Mac McDonald, PositIOn #4 - Sue King, and PosItIOn #5, Steve Schneider. They would all lIke
to be reappomted. Their new 2-year terms will expire 12/31/2007.
Unless I hear otherwise from members of the CouncIl by November 28th, I will be askmg that
these appointments be confirmed at the Regular City Council meetmg on Monday, December
5th.
Thank you.
Iso
encl.
cf: Derek Speck
Bev WIllIson
Kimberly MateJ
Lucy Lauterbach
Phone: 206-433-1800 · City Hall Fax: 206-433-1833 · WtAlw.ci.tukwila.wa.us
.
Q1y of Tukwila
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
Type or pnnt clearly and retum completed 1'01111 to' Office of the Mayor; 6200 Southcenter Blvd; Tukwila WA 98188
I wish to be considered for appomtment to the followmg board or commission.
o Arts CommissIOn ~odgmg Tax. AdvIsory Committee
o Equity and Diversity Commission 0 Human Services Board
o Civil Service Commission 0 Library Advisory Board
o Community-Oriented PolIcmg Citizens Advisory Board (COPCAB)
Name: C~ir-, O;,'-'EILi
Address:
Phone, Day'
Night:
Please check all that apply to you within the Tukwila City limits:
o School Distnct Representative [E(Business Owner/Manager
Available to attend meetings: [2(Evenings GY'Daytime
Present employer/occupation (ifretJred, please mdicate fOffi1er occupatIOn)'
o Park Commission
o Plannmg Commission
o Sister City Committee
o Other'
Date: II /14-/'1 ,-
Zip Code:
Ematl: C OV1 ~; 1I€;....... <-1) e'<..1.,,-.., c.f'p I'JvJ
o Resident
o High School Student
c'.)
1:-\[ ;v\VH v.-'\.y::. Ft.. i(",-<.j.
Phone:
Occupational hlstorylbackground. AvIAJh~r-f ~~Kc:" rl,-'e.
-
Professional/community activities (orgs., clubs, service groups, etc.)' PvC,':'j Sc 'JO'"D .1 J'T" A. 71",.....5 C;:'v...\(([
Hobbies/interests: Pi 'i '~\6) ,'V'c.-<; i r /ltLl.') ,~~
QualIfications related to this position. C vt2 '1t:,.(j ,IJCj/T ,....-/
If you have previously served on one of the above boards/commissions, please provide details:
MfA
Describe why you are interested in serving on this board/commission/committee: II'to ;v1 "') j-"..., 1 ~ PlFA>p/) :-:> ,iF PA.'!..J- ~ ., H,-
<:>E'lbiuo ~U7t\<;ll)f i-L")Pn',H 1"( <;t;(;c/t _ !. Ftc\. w~ CII""" 0.-.....T..."u\lJ7f. 1\ (,>Q..{;AT f>t:3/J( ~ -H,;. nt-vii .-"^"-b-';'
cF -;1-1c:' Iri/JtJ;7tLf IH ?".- /1{!!'/'I
Signature:
Date:
111/4-(0'
( I
Note: Upon sub lssioll, all information Oil this form becomes public record. For further clarification regarding this
applicatioll or more information regarding the boards or commissions, please call the Mayor's office at 206-433-18~O.
1~/2ID5 c.v..to-Ln p6rli~ of .+'-~
~ ~/~~/L)
M<LOC'-o.:tu1ru wdJL -flY- ~. Sf.
QlWn -PLLhlic ~~Ac::f. 0cfr/;akL
,--' I /
Application for Appointment 6'20,03
,.
".TI1LA,
COUNCIL A GENDA SYNOPSIS
p,
ITEM No.
A PN/ R 1 0 Meeting Date I Prepared by 1 Mayor's n'view I Council anew
SQ p1S
ms `s 1 11/28/05 R 1
OR; 1 12/05/05 RF' 1.� 1;
„4,7
1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER. 05-154 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE. November 28, 2005
AGENDA I IEM TITLE Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments Update Transportation Element
CA 1'EGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bad Award Public Hearzng Other
Mfg Date lltg Date lltg Date rlltg Date Mg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mgyor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal Pea Police n PIV
SPONSOR'S Briefing on Planning Commission's recommended Transportation Element. Hearing
SUMMARY scheduled on 12/5/05.
REVIEWED BY COW AItg CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 11/14/05
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN.
COMB IITTEE (Transportation: Refer to C.O.W.)
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source:
Comments.
MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
I 11/28/05 Forward to hearing on 12/5/05
MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS
12/5/05 Memo from Jack Pace dated 11 /29/05
1. Ordinance (with Transportation Element)
(Exhibit B to ordinance is bound Transportation Plan document
provided separately at 11/28/05 meeting.)
City of Tukwila
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Development
Steve Lancaster, Director
To.
From.
Subject:
Date.
TukwIla CIty CouncIl ~
Jack Pace, Deputy DIrector DCD ~..
ComprehenSIve Plan Amendment TransportatIon Element
November 29,2005
BACKGROUND
The City Council held a public meeting on proposed changes to the ComprehensIve Plan
TransportatIon Element on July 18, 2005, and forwarded the amendments to the Plannmg
CommIssIon for review. The Plannmg CommissIon and CIty Council were bnefed Jomtly on
the background materials and new policies on June 9, September 8, and October 12,2005
The Planning CommIssIon held a public heanng on October 27,2005. Followmg the
heanng, the CommIssion made recommendations and forwarded the Issue to the CIty
Council. The TransportatIon CommIttee was bnefed at ItS meetmg on November 14, 2005,
and forwarded the Issue to the COW for a bnefing on November 28,2005, a publIc hearing
on December 5,2005 and a decIsIOn.
TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT POLICIES
Per your direction on November 28, 2005, staff has mcorporated comments from the
Planning Commission (10/27/05) and the TransportatIon CommIttee (11/14/05) into the
recommended ComprehensIve Plan Transportation Element. (Attachment A wIth
Ordmance ).
At the November 28 meeting, Councilmember Robertson requested a new polIcy on traffic
calmmg measures. Please note that the ComprehensIve Plan ResIdentIal NeIghborhoods
element currently contains the followmg polIcies with nnplementatIOn strategIes for traffic
calming:
Policy 744 Design residential local access streets to provide the minimum capacity for
emergency access andfor slow traffic
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
. ReqUIre sidewalk and landscape planter for both sIdes of resIdentIal streets
. Street desIgn critena
. Traffic cahmng program
. Require sidewalk and landscape planter m front of all multI-famIly developments
. Pnonty for neIghborhood qualIty design features (e.g. removal of one lane or parkmg
before removal of sIdewalk) when reducing street facIlItIes
. Rights-of-way mcorporatmg desIred design features
. Encourage sidewalks and planters where appropnate on 2-lane Improvements
. Emergency vehIcle purchasing cntena that accommodate street desIgn standards
"TUK2\VOLJ.HOMEREBECCA;2005 Comp Plan am~nd!l1~nts..CC memo 12.5 OS.doc
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 · Tukwila, Washington 98188 · Phone: 206-431-3670 · Fax: 206-431-3665
. Alternatives to cIrcular cul-de-sacs to mmimIze paved area
. SIdewalks can be mcluded wIthm the reqUIred emergency vehIcle turnmg radIUs
. Sidewalks whIch include handIcap cutouts for handIcap access
Policy 7545 Design collector arterials for slow but steady speeds
IMPLEMENT A nON STRATEGIES
. Use a two travel lane, local access road desIgn as the basIc collector artenal desIgn to
encourage safe speeds
. New mmor and principal artenals routed around resIdentIal neighborhoods
. Traffic calmmg program
The following new policy addressing traffic calming has been added to the TransportatIOn
Element:
13.1.3 Balance travel efficiency, safety and quality-of-life in residential areas through
creative roadway design..
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
. Traffic Calmmg Program
COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
After holding its heanng on December 5, the CIty CouncIl will make a final decisIOn on the
recommended changes to the TransportatIon Element. The CIty CouncIl may'
. Adopt the proposed amendments
. Adopt a modIfied version of the proposed amendments; or
. Reject the amendments.
\\TUK2\V0L3\HOME\REBECCA\2005 Camp Plan <lmendments\CC memo 12.5.05.doc
[IDOOill~1J
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT OF
THE CITY OF TUKWILA'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND E~TABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Tukwila's Co~prehensive Plan and development regulations are to be
reviewed and updated as appropriate; and
WHEREAS, per RCW 36.70.A, amendments to the Comprehensive Plan shall not be
considered more frequently than once every year, except in cases of emergency or to
amend the Shoreline Master Program; and
WHEREAS, work on updating the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive
Plan has been in progress for several years, and an application to amend the
Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan was submitted in December 2004, and
WHEREAS, after draft amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Transportation
Element were sent to the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and
Economic Development on September 20, 2005, no comments were received, and
WHEREAS, on October 17, 2005, the draft amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
Transportation Element were determined to have no significant environmental effects;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila Planning Commission, held a public hearing on
October 27, 2005, and after having received and studied staff analysis and comments from
the public, has recommended the adoption of amendments to the Transportation Element;
and
WHEREAS, notices of a public meeting and a public hearing were published in the
Hazelnut, and the Seattle Times; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held the public meeting on July 18, 2005 and the public
hearing on December 5, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the amended Transportation Element adopts by reference new
background information, including a Transportation Plan and a Transit Plan, and policies
that ensure that the City-wide impacts of growth are assessed and mitigated in a timely,
systematic manner; and
WHEREAS, after due consideration, the City Council believes that certain
amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan are necessary;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
C:\Documents and Senings\A1I Users\Desk'1op\Kelly\MSDA T A\Ordinan=\Comp Plan Amend 2005.doc
RF:ksn 12f'.12005
Page 1 0[2
Section 1. The Transportation Element of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan, as
adopted by Ordinance No. 1757, is hereby amended to read as shown in Exhibit A
(attached), and adopts by reference Tukwila's Transportation Plan and Transit Plan
(Exhibit B, attached).
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be
invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in
the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after
passage and publication as provided by law
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at
a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2005
AITEST/ AUTHENTICATED:
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council.
Published:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number'
Office of the City Attorney
, :
C:\Document5 and SeningslAJl Users\Desktop\KellyIMSDAT AlOrdinances\Comp Plan Amend 2005.doc
RF:ksn 121212005
Page 2 of2
EXHIBIT A
~:. :::' ~
-;- :-;~
TRANSPORTATION
PURPOSE
The Transportation Element establishes Tukwila's transportation goals and policies for the 20-year
planning period. It provides direction for transportation decisions regarding annual plan updates including
the Comprehensive Transportation Plan, the six-year Transportation Improvement Plan, the six-year
Capital Improvement Plan, and the annual budget. It also provides guidance for development review and
approval, land use and zoning decisions, and continuing transportation programs.
..-
The Transportation Element also establishes a basis for decision-making that is consistent with
Washington's Growth Management Act requirements and assures concurrence with other agencies.
These specific requirements are fulfilled by the City of Tukwila's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, and
summarized herein. The Comprehensive Transportation Plan, Tukwila Transit Plan, and the annually
updated six-year Transportation Improvement Plan, six-year Capital Improvement Plan, and the budget
are all adopted by reference in the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan.
ISSUES
Tukwila's diverse transportation system includes freeways, highways, arterial streets, access streets, bus
and commuter rail transit service, Amtrak passenger rail service, sidewalks, trails, and neighborhood
footpaths. In addition, Boeing Field provides air transportation for a combination of primarily general and
business aviation. The Duwamish River provides water access to Elliott Bay and beyond. Significant
commercial freight transportation is provided by trucking and railroads throughout the City. Future Tukwila
transportation system additions include light rail (slated to open in 2009) and possibly Bus Rapid Transit.
LEVEL OF SERVICE
The capacity of a transportation facility reflects its ability to accommodate a moving stream of people or
vehicles. It is a measure of the supply side of transportation facilities. Level of service (LOS) is a
measure of the quality of flow. Capacity and LOS calculations are needed for most traffic engineering and
transportation planning decisions and actions.
Traffic Level of Service
In this instance, Level of s.ervice is used to describe and define capacity of a corridor or intersection. A
grading system, defined in the Highway Capacity Manual, published by the Transportation Research
Board, ranges from A (best) to F (worst).
Table 1 - Traffic Level of Service Standards
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Transportation
LOS Delay per Vehicle Delay per Vehicle
Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections
A Less than or equal to 10 seconds Less than or equal to 10 seconds
B Greater than 10 and less than or Greater than 10 and less than or equal to 15
equal to 20 seconds seconds
C Greater than 20 and less than or Greater than 15 and less than or equal to 25
equal to 35 seconds seconds
D Greater than 35 and less than or Greater than 25 and less than or equal to 35
equal to 55 seconds seconds
E Greater than 55 and less than or Greater than 35 and less than or equal to 50
equal to 80 seconds \ seconds
. Greater than 50 seconds
F Greater than 80 seconds
Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 2000.
Transit Level of Service
Transit service, both frequency and time-span of service, is an important aspect of a healthy transportation
network. The Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, also published by the Transportation
Research Board, establishes level of service standards for transit.
Table 2 - Service requency . r an c e u e ransl ervlce
.
Headway Vehiclel
LOS (min) hour Comments
A <10 >6 Passenqers don't need schedules
B 1 0-14 5-6 Freauent service, passenqers consult schedules
C 15-20 3-4 Maximum desirable time to wait if bus/train missed
0 21-30 2 Service unattractive to choice riders
E 31-60 1 Service available durinq hour
F >60 <1 Service unattractive to all riders
no
F
LOS U b S h did T
'tS
Source: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2 Ed, 2003
Table 3 - Hours of Service LOS
LOS Hours er Da
A 19-24
B 17-18
C 14-16
o 12-13
E 4-11
F 0-3 Ve limited or no service
Source: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2n Ed,,2003
service
Non-motorized Level of Service
A level of service for pedestrian and other modes of non-motorized transportation is much more difficult to
establish. Various methodologies exist but none are yet considered industry standards.
December 5, 2005
2
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Transportation
Streets and Highways
-'-~
Tukwila is divided into three areas of distinct traffic patterns and roadway needs. The largest volume of
traffic, as well as the area with the largest needs for infrastructure, is in the Tukwila Urban Center (TUG)
To the north, the Manufacturing and Industrial Center (MIC) has a large amount of existing infrastructure,
but has unused capacity due to a change in land uses and building tenants since 1995. The central and
southwestern areas of Tukwila are predominately residential in nature, criss-crossed with residential
streets funneling traffic onto large north-south arterials such as Interurban Avenue Sand Tukwila
International Boulevard.
..
The TUC has a very unique traffic pattern due to its predominately commercial nature. Unlike the rest of
the city, the traditional commuter p.m. peak hour is not always the peak of congestion. Oftentimes, the
peak weekday volumes of traffic ocyur around the lunch hour, and the true peak of weekly volumes occurs
on Saturday. Holiday shopping increases the daily volumes as much as 25-50% above the rest of the
year. Since 1990, daily traffic volumes in the TUC have risen nearly 17%. For the most part, existing
travel speeds of motorists in the TUC average around 20 m.p.h., and is a Level of Service C (LOS C).
Although there are some intersections that operate poorly during peak hours, for the most part, the TUC
area intersections also average at LOS C.
--
.;.:;..
Safety in the TUC is generally good from a motorist point of view. Major South center Parkway
intersections have the largest number of accident occurrences, though none are above the King County
average for accidents on similar streets.
Throughout the remainder of Tukwila, the traditional p.m. peak hour is the peak traffic volume. The
average level of service is LOS B at key intersections but there are some specific locations where the
capacity of the intersection is being approacred. Accident-occurrences are generally at lesser rates than
the TUe area.
There are four classes of streets: principal arterials, minor arterials, collector arterials, and access streets
(Table 3 and Figure 1) These four classes of street were developed in recognition of a transition in street
use from strictly access to properties to pure mobility. The differences result in different street widths,
access control, speed limit, traffic controls, and other similar design and operation features While the
street sections and speed limits shown are generic for the each functional classification, current City
codes and specific sub-area plans will govern.
T bl 3 F f
1St tS t St d d
a e - unclona ree jYS em an ar s
Functional Classification Right of Way Curb-to-Curb Speed Limit
Local Access Streets 50 to 60 ft. 28 to 36 ft. 25 mph
Collector Arterials 60 ft. 36 to 40 ft. 30 mph
Minor Arterials 60 - 80 ft. 36 to 48 ft 30 to 35 mph
Principal Arterials 80 to 100 ft. 60 to 84 ft. 35 to 50 mph
*Standards above are typical; see current City codes for actual standards
The TUC area is projected to see the most growth in traffic by 2020. Without needed capacity
improvements, LOS problems will develop, with an average of LOS ElF for the area and many locations
projected to operate extremely poorly. The rest of the city fares better with an average of LOS D.
However, many intersections will operate at severe LOS F conditions without improvements.
December 5, 2005
3
TUKVVILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Transportation
Access streets in residential areas are not projected to experience LOS problems by the year 2020.
However, the occasional problem of "too much traffic, too fast" can occur and measures to address safety
and access would be determined based on studies and measures to reduce the volumes and speed.
The City maintains an annually updated Capita! Improvement Plan (CIP) identifying projects that will
address current and future system deficiencies. A full reporting and discussion of the data on traffic
forecasts and present and future levels of service is included in the Comprehensive Transportation Plan.
Trans it
King County Metro provides bus service throughout the City of Tukwila. Fourteen different routes provide
intra-Tukwila service and direct service to Burien, Kent, Auburn, Seattle, Renton, and West Seattle. At
this time, Sound Transit does not serve' any destinations in Tukwila with Regional Express Bus service.
Sounder, the regional commuter rail service, has a stop in Tukwila at Tukwila Station, as does Amtrak
regional and national passenger rail service.
The City of Tukwila strives to collaborate and cooperate with the region's transit providers in order to
improve and support these systems. The goal of increasing overall transit ridership within the City of
Tukwila drives the need for both service and capital improvements. Transit speed and reliability, improved
passenger amenities, and access to transit service are all crucial for attracting and maintaining transit
riders.
Tukwila desires quality transit service to support and complement adjacent land uses. To achieve this, a
multi-hub system and Transit Priority Corridor Classifications were developed. This classification system
was created with the goal of establishing several different focal points for service in Tukwila. These
include the S. 154th Street Link Light Rail Station, the Tukwila Commute:- Rail/Amtrak Station, an improved
Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center, and a new link connecting the Tukwila Commuter Rail/Amtrak
Station to areas near Westfield Mall at Southcenter. Improved routes and frequency feed into this multi-
hub concept. Some changes in route alignments or schedules are recommended to meet a system-wide
need.
Transit Priority Corridor Classifications (Table 4 and Figure 2) were developed which identify transit
corridor types by function, ideal transit operational characteristics, optimal adjacent land uses, and
supporting physical design features of the public infrastructure. This tool is designed to be flexible and
assist quality decision-making. An inventory of present transit routes are contained in the Tukwila Transit
Plan. Full details on the recommendations for service changes and infrastructure needs are also included
in that document. King County-Metro and Sound Transit control changes to routes.
Table 4: Transit Corridor Classifications
Classification Functional Purpose Typical Adiacent land Use
TRANSIT WAY Provides frequent, high speed, high capacity service Major private and public developments of regional
and interregional transit trips. siqnificance, Should not be adjacent to residential areas,
TRANSIT PRINCIPAL Provides frequent, moderate speed, high capacity Major private and public developments of regional or local
CORRIDOR service, connections between major activity centers, significance; adjacent to commercial, industrial, and high-
and some interreqional trips density residential land uses,
TRANSIT MINOR Provides connections between local transit Major private and public developments. Generally are
CORRIDOR destinations, concentrated to connect and reinforce located adjacent to high and medium.density residential
major activity centers and residential areas. areas as well as commercial areas,
TRANSIT LOCAL Provides connections between neighborhoods and Neighborhood activity centers such as schools,
ACCESS STREET area attractions. . businesses, recreational facilities, and single-family
neighborhoods
POTENTIAL Roadways without existing transit service or service Depends on location.
TRANSIT ROADWAY but are potential future transit roadway
December 5, 2005
4
Map Legend
.-.- Freeway
- - - Principal
.......... Minor
- Collector
CJ City Limits
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Transportation
~ City of
'QJI Tukwila
Functional Classification Map
Figure 1
lIotto Scale
ram
Date: P-ugust 7. 2002
Figure 1 -Functional Classification Map
December 5, 2005
5
TUK\j'VILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Transporlation
Figure 2: Transit Priority Corridor Classifications
Transit Priority
Corridor Classification
-TransitWay
- Transit Principal Conidor
- Trnnsit MinorCorri(for
- Transit Local Access
- potential Transit Roadway
N
\
..
i
)
ViF
December 5, 2005
6
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Transportation
Non-motorized Transportation
A non-motorized transportation plan is included in this Comprehensive Transportation Plan and has been
coordinated with the King County Non-motorized Plan. It differentiates two categories of non-motorized
trips: Category I trips are "through" trips for bicycle commuters using trails, bikeways, and bicycle-friendly
streets. Category II trips are "within neighborhood" trips, for example between homes and schools or
between home and play-field, park, or market.
Category I improvements include completing the Interurban and King County Green River trails, which will
provide access to the GreenIDuwamish high-employment corridor for bicycle, combined bicycle and bus,
and combined bus and walking trips, as well as for recreation and exercise The Category I improvements
include incorporating bicycle, pedestrian, and other non-motorized transportation elements in other
transportation improvement designs.
Category II improvements include neighborhood footpaths, sidewalks, and the pedestrian path program of
paving shoulders and paths for non-motorized travel.
Both Category I and II improvements involve the cooperation of King County Metro, the Tukwila Parks
Department, and other agencies including King County, neighboring jurisdictions, and the Washington
State Department of Transportation.
A non-motorized transportation plan specific to the TUC inventories existing pedestrian and bicycle
facilities in the urban center. Recommendations improvements to link and support pedestrian and bicycle
activity in the TUC are included in the TUC Subarea Plan.
LE\lEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
'.
Level of service standards for all local arterials and transit routes are necessary in order to ensure
mobility, vitality, and quality of life for the city. The standard, coordinated with surrounding jurisdictions, is
to judge the performance of the system against what the community is willing to accept and what can be
financed.
Traffic
Projected growth in Tukwila, and surrounding areas, was used in the Comprehensive Transportation Plan
to project traffic volumes and levels of service in 2020. In order to develop an LOS standard and
determine the improvements needed to maintain capacity, consideration was given to projected demands
and projected income. The City must have a fiscally constrained financing plan that is balanced with
planned growth and existing and future needs Significant new capacity will be required to accommodate
future growth throughout the city. The majority of the project needs are in the TUC area.
In general terms, the City's LOS standard for arterials is LOS E in commercial areas and LOS D in
residential areas. Within the TUC area, level of service is calculated by averaging defined key
intersections to obtain a corridor standard, elsewhere in the city, the level of service is calculated on
individual key intersections.
The TUC area and key arterial corridors throughout Tukwila will continue to be monitored to assure that
the LOS standard is maintained. The Tukwila Comprehensive Transportation Plan identifies improvements
that would maintain adopted level of service standards around the City. Projects necessary to maintain
the minimum level of service standard will be built, as needed, to accommodate projected growth. In the
December 5, 2005
7
TUK'NILA COrj1PREHENSIVE PLAN
Transportation
event of a funding shortfall or unexpected growth, the City must re-evaluate planned land uses and
explore alternate funding sources to assure continuing concurrency with transportation system
improvements.
Transit
At this time, Tukwila is not the owner/operator of a transit service, therefore a minimum level of service
standard cannot be enforced. However, Tukwila encourages all transit providers to achieve and maintain
a minimum LOS C and work within Tukwila's Transit Street Classification System.
GOALS AND POLICIE~
Goal 13.1
Overall
Safe and efficient movement of people and goods to, from, within, and through Tukwila.
Policies
13.1.1
13.1.2
13.1.3
13.1.4
Focus on safety as the first priority at an ongoing and continuous monitoring program.
Focus on highest possible transportation efficiency, while balancing the needs to provide
streets that maximize traffic movement with streets that are designed to be consistent with
existing and desired land uses.
Balance travel efficiency, safety, and quality-ot-lite in residential areas through creative
roadway design.
Support, encourage, and implement transportation programs and improvements that promote
water quality and regional air quality.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
A. Ongoing monitoring of accidents and level of service
B. Traffic Calming Program
Goa113.2 Transportation System
Expansion of the existing public street network into a hierarchy of street designs that serve pedestrian and
vehicle safety, traffic movement, and adjacent land use.
Policies
13.2.1
Develop a street network plan that augments the existing system of streets, breaks up super-
blocks in non-residential areas, and provides functional separation of traffic through new
streets on new alignments
8
December 5, 2005
13.2.2
13.2.3
13.2.4
13.2.5
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Transportation
Require street improvement projects and development improvements to be in accordance with
the general Functional Street System Standards or subarea plan and require an engineering
study of specific conditions.
Require all new streets, street improvements, property developments and property
improvements to provide sidewalks consistent with adopted standards and subarea plans.
Property developments and improvements in commercial areas will provide direct pedestrian
access from sidewalks to buildings
Continue to improve residential streets and coordinate with utility improvements.
Regional or non-local traffic will be discouraged on residential access streets.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
A. Sidewalk ordinance
B. Subdivision ordinance
C. Street Network Plan
Goal 13.3 Level-of-Service
Traffic levels-of-service that provide safe and efficient movement of people, bikes, cars and buses and
incorporate evolving land use and traffic patterns.
Policies
13.3.1
In general, Level of SeNice Standards shall vary by differing levels of development patterns,
desired character of streets, and growth management objectives. Use the following LOS
standards to guide City improvement and development approval decisions:
The Tukwila Urban Center corridor average is not to exceed LOS E, except for the
Strander Boulevard and a portion of the Andover Park E corridor. Methodology for
computing the average LOS is described in the Comprehensive Transportation Plan and is
updated annually in the Concurrency Ordinance.
The Strander Boulevard corridor average is not to exceed LOS F with an average delay
not to exceed 120 seconds. The Andover Park E, between Tukwila Parkway and Strander
Boulevard, is not to exceed LOS F with an average delay not to exceed 120 seconds.
All other non-residential arterial intersections are not to exceed LOS E.
The LOS of minor and collector arterials in predominantly residential areas is not to
exceed LOS D for each specific arterial.
West Valley Highway (SR 181), as a state highway of regional significance, is not to
exceed LOS E/Mitigated, as defined by PSRC.
SR 599, as a state highway of regional significance, is not to exceed LOS E/Mitigated, as
defined by PSRC.
9
December 5, 2005
133.2
13.3.3
13.3.4
13.3.5
13.3.6
13.3.7
13.3.8
13.3.9
TUK'NILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Transportation
Use adopted LOS standards to guide City improvement and development approval decisions:
Maintain adopted LOS standards in planning, development, and improvement decisions.
Provide capacity improvements or trip reduction measures so that the LOS standard is not
exceeded.
When reviewing private development proposals, apply the Concurrency Ordinance to
determine mitigation, if required, that will provide capacity or traffic generation control.
Include as a priority increased transportation choices such as transit use; rideshare measures
such as carpooling as capacity mitigation measures; and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. After
consideration of these priority improvements, consider signal improvements, other street
capacity improvements, and street widening as a last resort.
Establish a program to monitor congestion and evaluate the effectiveness of the LOS
standards.
Highways of Statewide significance (HSS), including Interstate 5 (/-5), Interstate 405 (1-405),
and State Route 518 (SR-518), are exempt from concurrency requirements.
Regionally Significant State Highways, including SR 181 (West Valley Highway) and SR 599
are subject to a Regional Level of Service Standard established by the Puget Sound Regional
Council and WSDOT.
- LOS standard for Regionaily Significant State Highways within. Tukwila's boundaries is
LOS E/Mitigated.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
A. Concurrency Ordinance
B. Ongoing monitoring of traffic volumes and levels of service
Goa113.4 Public Transportation, Transit, Rideshare
Efficient transit capacity that will reduce singIe-occupancy-vehicle trips to, from, and through TukwiIa and
provide public transportation for TukwiIa residents who depend on it.
Policies
13.4.1
13.4.2
13.4.3
Recommend and pursue a bus route along Interstate 405 connecting a Tukwila multi-modal
center, located at Interstate 405 and Interurban, with Everett (Boeing) and serving the freeway
stations, such as the Bellevue Transit Center.
Recommend and pursue a regional multi-modal center in conjunction with the Tukwila
Commuter Rail/Amtrak Station and secondary pedestrian/bicycle/transit hubs elsewhere in the
City.
Pursue amenities and funding in support of a pedestrian/bicycle route linking Westfield Mall at
Southcenter to the Tukwila Commuter Rail/Amtrak Station.
December 5, 2005
10
TUK'NILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Transportation
13.4.4 Continue to provide Commute Trip Reduction Program service to Tukwila employers and to
provide assistance to Metro, Washington State Department of Transportation, King County,
and adjacent agencies in increasing people-carrying capacity of vehicles and reducing trips,
13.4.5 Continue to encourage the use of rideshare, transit, bicycle, and evolving technological
transportation improvements.
13.4.6 Continue to support, participate in, and encourage the development and implementation of
regional/rapid rail with service to the Tukwila Urban Center, and other emerging efficient-
capacity technologies that will serve people traveling to, from, and within Tukwila.
13.4.7 Support and encourage the extension of regional light rail facilities to serve the Urban Center.
The preferred route can be cpnceptually described as running South from the vicinity of 1-405,
to a station located east of Southcenter Mall and west of the eastern edge of Andover Park
West and in proximity to the TUC Transit Center, then turning east running adjacent to or
parallel to Strander Boulevard, across West Valley Highway and north to a second station
adjacent to the Tukwila Sounder Station at Longacres.
13.4.8 Support forming a partnership with Metropolitan King County, Westfield Mall at Southcenter,
and surrounding businesses to locate a pedestrian-friendly transit center on Andover Park
West, between Baker Boulevard and Strander Boulevard.
13.4.9 Research and pursue a TUC circulator service that would connect the Tukwila Station, the
Transit Center, businesses, and attractions in the TUC with frequent service to encourage
reduction of single-occupant vehicle trips, enhance the Southcenter area's image as a lifestyle
ce"7ter, and bring more customers tp all businesses.
13.4.10 Encourage and support public transportation services including expanded dia/-a-ride and fixed-
route van service, to areas that do not produce transit ridership warranting a bus route,
transportation system management (TSM) program, the continued development of commuter
and light rail particularly with service to the Tukwila Urban Center area, and continue to provide
and support Commute Trip Reduction service.
13.4.11 Establish mode-split goals for all significant employment centers which will vary according to
development densities, access to transportation service and levels of congestion.
13.4. 12 The development of any light rail or commuter rail system should meet the following objectives:
Any commuter or light rail system serving Tukwila, Seattle, South King County and/or Sea-
Tac Airport should be located in a manner which promotes the coordinated short-term and
long-term use of alternative transportation systems, such as carpools, buses, commuter
rail, and light rail.
Such systems shall be located so as to aI/ow for future extensions to commuter and/or
light rail service to East King County and Southeast King County.
Such systems shall be located in a manner that serves the Tukwila Urban Center and the
Tukwila Multi-modal Center, so as to encourage the development of these Centers in the
manner contemplated by this Plan and the Countywide Planning Policies.
13.4.13 Encourage transit-oriented uses, development patterns and pedestrian amenities in the vicinity
of high-capacity transit stations.
December 5, 2005
11
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Transportation
134. 14 Require that parking facilities developed in conjunction with transit facilities be adequately
sized and managed to prevent spillover parking onto private property, public property, or public
streets.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
A. Commute Trip Reduction Program
B. Encourage transit providers to meet minimum level of service standards
C. Tukwila lead on construction of Transit Center in TUC area
Goal 13.5 Non-motorized Transportation
Bicycle and walking capacity for regional Category I and local Category II
trips.
Policies
13.5.1
13.5.2
13.5.3
13.5.4
13.5.5
13.5.6
13.5.7
13.5.8
Implement specific improvements that provide safe bicycle and
walking capacity for regional (Category I) and local (Category II)
trips.
Continue the access street improvement program that provides sidewalks on access streets.
Include bicycle improvements in stieet improvement projects on designated bicycle-friendly
streets.
Continue to pursue grants to construct pedestrian and non-motorized improvements,
Continue to coordinate with adjacent agencies on the development of regional non-motorized
transportation improvements.
Provide additional sidewalks and foot trails as opportunities and development occur.
Pursue converting railroad and other easements to pedestrian and bicycle trails.
Require secure bicycle racks in appropriate locations.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
A. Adopt a non-motorized transportation plan for the City
B. Pursue connections between existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities
C. Pursue additional pedestrian and bicycle amenities
12
Oecember 5, 2005
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Transportation
Goal 13.6 Freight, Rail, Water, and Air Transportation
Geometric capacity for commercial freight transportation located in and serving
Tukwila.
Policies
13.6.1 Include trucking design parameters in principal and minor arterial
improvements as well as in commercial areas.
13.6.2 Include bus design considerations in street improvements on streets
with existing or potential bus service.
13.6.3 Allow truck traffic on al/ principal and minor arterials as well as on
commercial area local access streets. Consider using load limit restrictions on
residential col/ector arterials and residential local access streets, fol/owing a traffic study and
meetings with residents and businesses.
13.6.4
Participate with King County and the Port of Seattle in updating airport master plans for all
airports affecting Tukwila, to ensure that airport operations and development:
Goal 13.7
Enhances Tukwila goals and policies.
Incorporates Tukwila land use plans and regulations.
Minimizes adverse impacts to !ukwila residents.
Funding Sources and Mitigation Payment System
Funding through grants, mitigations, general funds, and other sources for safety and capacity measures to
maintain adopted LOS standards.
Policies
13.7.1
Continue to pursue grants.
13.7.2
Use an impact fee system that identifies:
Capacity improvements based upon the long-term 2020 LOS needs but also
accommodates a realistic financing plan.
Costs of improvements needed to mitigate growth is ref/ected in the annual Capital
Improvement Plan update and annual update to the Concurrency Ordinance and Impact
Fee Schedule.
Costs to be shared between new development and existing users.
Impact Fee assessments, determined by the number of new development trips in the p.m
peak hour.
Additional mitigation, in accordance with the Concurrency Ordinance when development
affects locations not meeting Concurrency standards.
December 5, 2005
13
13.7.3
13.7.4
13.7.5
TUK"VILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Transportation
Study and pursue funding sources such as Local Improvement Districts (LIDs) to pay for
improvements not fully funded by grants, impact fees, and general funds.
Update the Capital Improvement Plan annually, adding new projects and deleting completed
projects.
Update the Impact Fee Schedule annually, adding new projects, deleting projects as
necessary, and keeping project costs at current dollar value.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
A Adopt and annually update a Concurrency Ordinance and Impact Fee Schedule.
i
B Aggressively pursue gtant opportunities.
December 5, 2005
14
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
�gsti rrrtttals ITEM No.
Q Q 1 G tivleetur� Date Prepared by Ma_ }•or'.r review Council review 1
12/05/05 KAF L/ 1
I I 1
3
ITEM INFORMATION
ICAS NUMBER: 05-136 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE. DECEMBER 5, 2005 (Ref. 10/17/05)
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Review of Final Adjustments to the 2006 Proposed Budget
CATEGORY Dtscztsston Motion Resolutton Ordinance BtdAward PublicHearzng Other
illtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 12/05/05 Aitg Date Mtg Date tlitg Date ilitg Date
SPONSOR [s] council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P &R Police PW
SPONSOR'S Attached for review are the final changes to the 2006 Proposed Budget.
SUMMARY
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utihttes Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planting Comm.
DAME:. October 3, 2005 through November 21, 2005
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Review Final Changes for Adoption of the 2006 Budget.
COMMITTEE Same
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$0 $0
Fund Source:
Comments
MTG. DATE 1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
12/5/05 1
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
12/ 5/05 Cover Memo from Finance Director
Detail of Final Adjustments for the 2006 Proposed Budget
Draft Ordinance Adopting the 2006 Budget
To:
Mayor and City Council
From:
Kevin A. Fuhrer, Finance Director
It-
Date:
December 1, 2005
Subject:
2006 Budget
One of the final steps remaining prior to adopting the 2006 Budget is to
review the changes that were identified during nearly 2 months of review
and deliberation. I have also identified 2005 Budget carry over which we
will need to accommodate in the 2006 Budget.
Attached to this memorandum is a detail of adjustments by fund. As an aid
in your review of the information, please note that I have specifically
distinguished the CIP page reference; otherwise the page is referencing the
budget document. The adjustments will be reviewed at the Finance
Committee preceding the Council meeting.
I look forward to reviewing this information with you on Monday,
December 5.
2006 Budget Adjustments
General 000
Revenues'
Page 2 Estimated Beginning Fund Balance 291 740 $ 235,720
Page 2 Economic Development Grant - Growth Management 334 $ 35,000
Total Revenues $ 270,720
Expenditures:
Council
Page 26 Travel 40 $ 6,000
Page 26 Consultant Services - Retreat 40 $ 3,000
Mayor
Page 38 Arts Commission TIB Art Work Carryover 60 $ 10,000
DCD
Page 74 Economic Development Grant - Growth Management 40 $ 35,000
Page 74 Commute Trip Reduction Grant 40 $ 21,325
Page 78 Transfer to Equipment Rental - Sedan Carryover 40 $ 22,000
Recreation
Page 62 TCC Fitness Equipment Carryover 60 $ 19,720
Page 62 Backyard Wildlife Fair 40 $ 10,000
Police
Page 86 Transfer to Equipment Rental - Police Car Cameras 60 $ 150,000
Page 90 Transfer to Equipment Rental - Seizure Funds Unit 1185 60 $ 17,000
Fund Balance
Page 22 Estimated Ending Fund Balance 291 840 $ (23,325)
Total Expenditures $ 270,720
►-Iotellitotel Tax 101
Expenditures
Page 135
Page 135
Arterial Street 104
Revenues.
CIP Page 38
CIP Page 39
CIP Page 39
C1P Page 40
CIP Page 43
CIP Page 48
Page
Expenditures.
CIP Page 33
CIP Page 37
CIP Nevv Page
C19 Page 38
CIP Page 39
CIP Page 40
CIP Page 43
CIP Page 48
Page 139
Salaries & Benefit Fund Balance
Estimated Ending
Total Expenditures
T Grant Carryover
se 11 Fed. G P Ill Fed Grant Carryover
TI B Phase ase
T1B Phase III State Grant Carryover
State Grant Grant
S 144th Sign Interconnect Carryover
Traffic Sin Ave Fed Grant
inning Fund Balance
Interurban Ben
Estimated
Revenues
Bridge Carryover
Boeing Access Rd
TUCjKlickitat Carryover
TIB Phase I over
T1B Phase II Carryover
1.16 Phase 111 Carryover
S 144th
Carryover Interconnect Carryover
Traffic Sigr\p%J carryover
Intern Ending Fund Balance
Estimatat ed
Total Expenditures
ent Cumulative Re$erve 107
Fire Eauipm
Expenditures,
Page 143
Page 143
Fire Pump
er Replacement
Fund Balance
Estimated Ending
Total Expenditures
28,871
10 20
291 g40
$ 440,000
333.202.21 2 640,000
333.203.23 $
334 03183 (2,830,000)
70 000
334 031 $4 $ 143,000
333.203.24 $ 172,000
333.203 21 802,000
291 740 $ 1 4
59510141
20,000
90,000
595 101 41 650,000
595 300 3 $ 440,000
595101 30,000
595101 41 500,000
595 640 63 $ 157 ,000
595 101 41 $ 200 000
595 650,000)
2g1 840 $ 1
450,000
291 840 (450,000)
Land Acquisition, Rec. & park Development 301
Revenues.
Page 12
Expenditures.
CIP Page 10
l Government Improvements 303
Genera
Revenues.
Page 14
Expenditures
CIP Page 71
COP Page 71
Poster Golf Course 411
Expenditures.
CIP Page 167
Page 164
Surface Water 412
Revenues�
CIP Page 141
page 18
Beginning Fund Balance
Total Revenues
ues
Winter Garden Carryover
Macadam
Total Expenditures
e inning Fund Balance
Estimated B g
Total Revenues
ineering Carryover
r Facilities - Eng Carryover
Minor Construction
Minor Facilities
Total Expenditures
Add brig anon Pump Replacement
Working Capital
Total Expenditures
Estimated Ending
36,000
2g1 740 36 0 00
36,000
594 760 63 36 000
291 740 $ 83
$ 830,000
Cascade
Trust Fund Loan
View Drainage Carryover
e inning Working Capital
Estimated B g
Total ReVenues
80,000
594 190 41 $ 750,000
594 190 62 830,000
35 000
594 760 31 $ 35,0001
293 800 $$ _
382 805 00 $ 1,049,000
293 700 $ 362,000
$ 687,000
Expenditures.
CIP Page 140
CIP Page 140
CIP Page 141
CIP Page 145
Equipment Rental 501
Revenues.
Page 20
Page 20
Page 20
Page 20
Annual Drainage Program - Design Carryover
Annual Drainage Program - Construction Carryover
Cascade View Drainage Carryover
Gilliam Creek Carryover
Total Expenditures
Operating Transfer In - General 000 (Police Cameras)
Operating Transfer In - General 000 (Unit 1185)
Operating Transfer In - General 000 (DCD Sedan)
Estimated Beginning Working Capital
Total Revenues
594 381 41 $ 40,000
594 383 63 $ 122,000
594 383 63 $ 500,000
594 381 41 $ 25,000
$ 687,000
397 00 $ 150,000
397 00 $ 17,000
397 00 $ 22,000
293 700 $ 88,000
$ 277,000
Expenditures.
Page 173 Aid Car Replacement 60 $ (160,000)
Page 173 Police Car Cameras 60 $ 150,000
Page 173 Water Department Service Truck Carryover 60 $ 17,000
Page 173 Street Chipper Carryover 60 $ 32,000
Page 173 TAC Van Carryover 60 $ 11,000
Page 173 Equipment Rental Service Truck Carryover 60 $ 22,000
Page 173 Equipment Rental Diagnostic Tool Carryover 60 $ 6,000
Page 173 DCD Sedan Carryover 60 $ 22,000
Page 173 Estimated Ending Working Capital 293 800 $ 177,000
Total Expenditures $ 277,000
DRAFT
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2006; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the preliminary budget of the City of Tukwila for the year was timely
submitted to the City Council, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing on the proposed budget was advertised and held on
November 21, 2005;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The budget on file with the City Clerk entitled "City of Tukwila Budget, 2006,"
is hereby adopted by reference as though fully set forth in accordance with RCW 35A.33,075
Section 2. The totals of the estimated revenues and appropriations for each separate fund,
and the aggregate totals are as follows:
FUND
000
101
103
104
105
107
207
208
209
210
301
302
303
401
402
404
405
411
412
501
502
503
611
General
Hotel/Motel Tax
City Street
Arterial Street
Contingency
Fire Equipment Cumulative Reserve
Limited Tax G.o. Bonds, 1999
Limited Tax G.O Bonds, 2000
Limited Tax G.O. Bonds, 2003
Limited Tax G.O. Refunding Bonds, 2003
Land Acquisition, Recreation & Park Develpmt.
Facility Replacement
General Government Improvements
Water
Sewer
Water/Sewer Revenue Bonds
Bond Reserve
Foster Golf Course
Surface Water
Equipment Rental
Insurance Fund
Insurance - LEOFF 1 Fund
Firemen's Pension
TOTAL ALL FUNDS COMBINED
EXPENDITURES
$45,538,544
1,525,189
663,827
21,913,000
798,364
793,721
973,403
402,358
565,221
702,254
3,654,999
5,963,244
1,800,936
11,042,333
9,480,498
690,054
577,587
2,213,059
7,526,396
5,309,801
4,082,105
1,074,504
1,385,595
$128,676,992
C\ Documents and Setlings\All Users\ Desktop \ Kelly\MSDA T A \Ordinances\BudgeI2006.doc
KF:k,n 121112005
REVENUES
$45,538,544
1,525,189
663,827
21,913,000
798,364
793,721
973,403
402,358
565,221
702,254
3,654,999
5,963,244
1,800,936
11,042,333
9,480,498
690,054
577,587
2,213,059
7,526,396
5,309,801
4,082,105
1,074,504
1,385,595
$128,676,992
Pa2:e 1 of 2
Section 3, A complete copy of the final budget for 2006, as adopted, together with a copy
of this adopting ordinance shall be transmitted by the City Clerk to the Division of Municipal
Corporations of the Office of the State Auditor and to the Association of Washington Cities,
Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase
of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or
unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of
this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the
official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force and effect five (5) days
after passage and publication as provided by law
PASSED BY THE CITY COlfNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a
Regular Meeting thereof this day of . 2005.
A TrEST I AUTHENTICATED:
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY'
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published.
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number'
Office of the City Attorney
')
C. \Documents and Settings\All Users\Desktop\Kelly\MSDATA \Ordinances\Budget 2006.doc
P",,,p? nf?
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
r „trrals ITEIvr No.
a I A”) 't tlleett* Date I Prepared by Mayor's review 1 Council review
i s k J t =s 12/05/05 KAF 1 t 1 rS
t o 1 l v
1 1 1 I
ITEM INFORMATION
ICAS NUMBER. 05-136 'ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE. DECEMBER 5, 2005 (Ref. 10/17/05)
AGENDA ITEM Trrr_.E Review of Final Adjustments to the 2006 -2011 Financial Planning Model and CIP.
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance BzdAward Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Altg Date 12/05/05 Altg Date 'Wig Date Altg Date dl Date
SPONSOR ►1 Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PIP'
SPONSOR'S A Resolution adopting the 2006 -2011 Financial Planning Model and CIP.
SUMMARY
REVIEWED BY COW Yitg CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE. October 3, 2005 through November 21, 2005
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Review Final Changes for Adoption.
COMMITTEE Same
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$0 $0
Fund Source.
Comments.
MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
I 1
MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS
1215:/05 1 Cover Memo from Finance Director
1 1 Detail of Final Adjustments for the 2006 Proposed Budget
Draft Resolution Adopting the 2006 -2011 Financial Planning Model and CIP
I I
1
To:
Mayor and City Council
From:
Kevin A. Fuhrer, Finance Director
\Ut-
Date:
December I, 2005
Subject:
Adoption of the 2006-2011 Financial Planning Model and CIP
One of the final steps remaining prior to adopting the 2006-2011 Financial
Planning Model and CIP is to review the changes that were identified during
nearly 2 months of review and deliberation, I have also identified 2005
Budget carry over amounts.
Attached to this memorandum is a detail of adjustments by fund. As an aid
in your review of the information, please note that I have specifically
distinguished the CIP page reference; otherwise the page is referencing the
budget document. The adjustments will be reviewed at the Finance
Committee preceding the Council meeting. In addition, I have included a
revised Attachments A, Band C that incorporate the proposed changes.
I look forward to reviewing this information with you on Monday,
December 5.
2006 Budget Adjustments
~ 0-
..- ..- 00 00 000 0 000000000 0 0
I'- I'- 00 00 000 0 000000000 0 0 0
CO CO I 0000 000 0 000000000 0 0 0
CO CO 0 000 C<)NN I'- 666666r--:66 I'- 6 0
N ~ ..q-..q-c<)1'- ..q-I'-O c<) NO>LO..q-c<)OLOOLO c<) LO LO
..q- <0_ CO_ ..- ..- co ..q- <o..q- LO..--N<O ..q- ..q-..q-
N~
f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 -f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7 f/7
..- c<) c<) ..q- ..q- ..- ..- ..- c<) ..- ..- c<) ..- ..-
N N co co N N ..q-..q- <O..q-..q- <0 ..q- ..q-
0 N c<) ..- ..- c<) C0 0 ..- ..- 0 ..- ..- 0 ..-- ..- 0 0
..q- 0 0 c<) c<) 0 0 ..q- 0 0 0 0 0 ..q- 0 0 ..q- ..q-
0 co "! "! 0 0 N N I'- ..- c<) ..- <0 ..-- ..- co co
N ..- c<) c<) ..q- ..q- (Y) c<) ..-- LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO ..- ..-
0 0> c<) c<) c<) c<) c<) ~ 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0 0>
..- N c<) c<) c<) c<) c<) N LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO N <0 N
L-
Cl)
>
o
~
L-
CU
U
Cl)
U
c::
CU
ro
CC
-0
c:: en
::J Cl)
en LL L-
~ 0>.3
~ ,!: '6
Cl)-gffi
ccWa.
~-OX
en2~
Cl) CU CU
'C Eo
J!!:.;::::;I-
CU en
U)W
+-' L-
c:: Cl)
~ > Cl)
<.9ou
~c::
-oroJ!!
~U~
+-'+-'-0
+-' u~c::
cc::~ ~L-LL::J
cucu..... c::<.9
L- (5 <.9 +-' 0 -0 0>
<.9 Cl) c:: ~ c::
. -0 +-' CU Cl) LLCl) 'c en
-oCl)CUL-+-, c::Cl)
Cl) LL U5 <.9 c:: Cl) '01 E
LL =Cl)->Cl)Cl)
ro~<(cc>
+-'O>C::-oCl)
U) .- CU Cl) 0::
.s::.U)..Q+-'-
~ ,~ :J CUE +-'ocu
..q-:t=L-
cccccc..-cu2:g1-
i=i=i=U)~C::w
L-
ID Cl)
> >
o 0
~~
L- CU
<3u
Cl) Cl) Cl)
en en en
CU CU CU
.s::. .s::. .s::.
0....0....0....
.....
o
.....
><
n:I
I- en
Q) Cl)
'O~~~
~-o..-..-
- c:: Cl) Cl)
Q)Cl)0>0>
'0 ~~~
:J:W
<:t
o
.....
-
Q)
Q)
...
-
(J)
n:I
.;:
Q)
1:
<(
co 0> 0> 0 c<) co
c<)c<)C0..q-..q-..q-
ui~~~~~~
Cl)cucucucucucuco
Eo....o....o....o....o....o....Cl)
g;e::e::e::e::e::e::g>
&UUUUUUo....
L- L-
Cl) Cl)
> >
o 0
~ ~ Cl)
L- L- U
CU CU c::
U U CU
Cl) +-'L-ro
0> uCl)CC
-OL- L- Cl)>-o
'C Cl) ID Cl) c:: 0 c::
cc> >> 5~::Jen
~~ ~~L-~roLL~
~ L- L.- L- Cl) Cl) U 0> ::J
0:: CU L- CU >0 C ..!: '6
enU <3u -Cl)-OC::
en+-, ~ro<(> c:: Cl)
~J9 roc:: wa.
u:s2 Cl) Cl) Cl)u O>C::-O x
<( ,~ en en en U5 CU Cl) W
o>S2~~~:Su-eroro
c:: -- 0.... 0.... 0.... ..q- .- ::J E 0
'w U ..q- :t= ID .- I-
0:J~~~"-~+-'U)
CCI-I-I-I-U)I-C::w
Cl)
U
c::
J!!
C CU
Cl)oo
E-g
~ ::J :n
cuLLL-
- o>::J
a.c:::t=
Cl) ._ -0
o::-oc::
L- c:: Cl)
Cl) W a.
a.-o x
ECl)w
::Jroro
0.... Eo
Cl):.;::::;1-
.~ en
LLW
r--
o
.....
Q)
~
Q)
en
Q)
0::
Q)
>
+:::
.!!!
::s
E
::s
U
Cl)
.. c<) I'- 0> co 0> 0 c<) co
:nC0C<)~C0C<)..q-..q-..q-
~~~~~~~~~~
'6CUCUCl)cucucucucu..-
c::o....o....zo....o....o....o....o....Cl)
~ e:: e:: e:: e:: e:: e:: e:: e:: g>
lijUUUUUUUUo....
-
t:
Q)
E
c..
::s
0-
W
Q)
...
u:
en
Cl)
:Jc<)c<)
:t=..q-..q-
-0"-"-
c:: Cl) Cl)
Cl)0>0>
a.cucu
xo....Q..
W
0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 '6 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 I 00 O.
c.s5 c.s5 c.s5 c.s5 c5 c5 c5c5 0 00 ~~ ~
(f) (f) (f) (f) (f) C0 colf) C0 (f)(f)
co co I- co --" o_~ r.D
'<'""
tFT tFT tFT tFT tFT tFT tFTtFT tFT tFTtfttFT tFTtFT tFT
C0 ...... C'J ...... 0
r.D .q- r.D (f) 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 If) 0
.q- r.D --r (j) (j) r.D 0 0 0
l- I- r- '<'"" ...... I-CO co r-
...... -.;t ...- .q- .q- -.;t(f) ~ (f)
(j) 0'> (j) (j) 0'> (j)(j) co 0'>
C'J If) C'J If) If) LOC'J (f) C'J
8
c:
~
~
cD
"
c:
::;:!
U-
~
,- II>
c: 0>
.~ ::;:!
g>~
0)'"
-00>
0>0::
m~
EO
.~ I-
I.l1
~
Q)
'"
o
~
~
ro
o
c:
0>
-0
'cU~
G~
~.a
2"6
C e
,- 0>
sa.
f6)
~-
"'O~
~ 0
rol-
~
....
o
C')
....
t:
Q)
E
C-
o
0)
::>
Q)
o
~
...
CIS
0-
~
"
ti
c
o
'';:>
'iij
'5
f:1'
~
-0
t:
~
U)C'J
~'<'""
e 0>
Q)O)
'" ro
~o..
mO
0>'<'""
~ 0>
.a 0)
.- ro
~a..
~9::
6)0
Q)
(.)
e
ro
(U
co
-0
e
::;:!
U-
0)
,~ II>
e 0>
-~ ::;:!
O)e
a> 0>
co~
-00:::
2-
ro~
E 0
.~ I-
UJ
C')
o
C')
.1!l
t:
Q)
E
Q)
~
...
0-
g
~
Q)
E
t:
...
Q)
~
C)
(6
....
Q)
c
Q)
C>
~Q)
'" "'0
o
~~
'cUro
00
O)~
.~ '+'
~g
0>';:;
.~ II>
~~
1.l10
II>
Q)
'-
.a
II> :n "6
0> 0> C
~:8g.
'~~~
u..u..~
>-.........
000
e c r-
~~
U).q-
~'<'""
C 0>
0>0)
'" ro
~o..
, '<'"" '<'""
~I-I-
~Q)Q)
.a 0) 0)
._ ro ro
~a..a..
Q)a..a..
0..--
(J500
c~
(1)'-
Eg-
(1)0
(.) 0)
~ C
0.. .-
a>-c
0:::011>
o..S (j)
E O)~
::;:! c'-
a.. .- "0
-oC
c e (j)
.g I.l1 ~
ro"OUJ
0)0>
"E ro ~
-EO
:g .~ r-
<(UJ
....
....
oo:t
Q)
~
~
o
()
I-
" CD
~'<'""
....o>.q-
.3 0> CD
.- ro ......
~a..o>
(1) a.. 0)
0.. - ro
6)00..
~
o
C)
...
Q)
~
o
\.L.
e
ro
3
-0
e
::;:!
u..
.....
II>
::;:!
\=-
I~
~ 'Q.
0> ro
60
~O)
ro .~
o-c
(j) 0
~s
e 0)
'~.~ II>
..... C 0>
a.~ ::;:!
~ 0) e
_~ S <g
>"a>
O>Q)oc
~~~
(.) E 0
~'~\-
01.l1
N
.....
qo
...
~
CIS
~
Q)
(J
~
~
(/)
'<'""
-.;t
...-
., (j)
II> 0) co
~ro""'"
e 0.. (j)
(I) 0.. 0)
::> _ ro
0>00-
((.
~
00000
00000
00000
.. .. .. ..
ONOLOf'-
'<tNONCO
T""" LO CO
00000
00000
00000
ci~NcOf'-
LOT"""NCOf'-
T""" N
tf7 tf7 tf7 tf7 tf7
tf7 tf7 tf7 tf7 tf7
T""" C") C") T"""
'<tCOCO'<t
T""" C") C") T"""
CO CO CO CO
C")C")C")C")
'<t'<t'<t'<t
0) 0) 0) 0)
LOLOLOLO
o
0000
000f'-
f'- f'- f'- C")
0) 0) 0) 0)
C")C")C")N
.....
a>
>
o
..... ~
a> ro
~U
C:'c:
..... 0
8:g
:J
c: ..... .....
.2> U; a>
I/) c: >
a> 0 0
ou ~
I I ro
EEU
ro ro a> .....
..... ..... 0> a>
o>O>ro > I/)
e e .s ~ ~
c..c..ro.....:J
a> a>o ro::::
0>0> u-u
roro~~C:
,s .s a> a> ~
~~>~x
ooa>Uw
roro16E]i
:J :J U ro 0
EE~~I-
<{<{UC)
(j)
ro
.....
a> "'2
E_ro
roLO-U
UCOa>
a>T"""OO
.~ ~ 0
oc:U
c..::JO
'-"'-"'-'ro
000::::
000 a.
OOOro
rororoU
IDWW~
c: c: c: ,-
a>a>a>~
C)C)C)O
c:c:~s
0>
L... L.. '- c
2a>a>c:1/)
I/)c: 'in 'in .s ~
roffiffio>c:
..... ..... ..... a> a>
I-I-I-CO~
g> g> g> -g cr:
.-.-.- ~
......,............coro
~~~Eo
~~~:;::;I-
OOOtYj
0'0
00
00
00
COLO
T""" T"""
---
00000000
00000000
00000000
.. .. .. .. .. .. -
f'-NT"""NCONf'-f'-
T"""C")T"""N Nf'-f'-
T"""N
tf7tf7tf7tf7tf7tf7tf7tf7tf7tf7
o
o
CO
C")
000000000)
CO CO CO CO COCO CO CO N
.....
ID '- Q.)
> a> >
o > 0
":>.. O~
1:... ~.....
..... '- ro
ro roU
U Uo ro
~ ~O +-'
g g I- .~
~ ~~ U
~'- a>~ g>
-,.a> Uc: :.5Z
.~ > .~ ~ a>'- '-
C a> 0 a> ,~ 0 I/)
a> 1/)00 ~'-OOO ~S ~
E ~c ro ~ roro ~0>.2
~ E EO> U 0 +-' c ro ,s '6
'- ~C:a> a>u-u c:
%816 ~rocr:cr: c: a>
a> '- a.a.u +-' ffiW 5t
cr:roa>:!::c:ffiffi-u-gw
,-uou>ro E EJ5roro
Uro a> +-' a. a. E +-'
U Q) a> U .- ,- 0 0
~~g~<{ 5-5-u'gl-
............>ooI-WWOW
.....
C
10
~
....
c
0 o T""" LO Q)
Uj '<t '<t'<t'<t a:: en
a> T""" T""" T""" T""" .... a>
'- a> a> 0> a> c en '- C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C")
~ 0)0)0)0) Q) 0> 0000 ~ f'- f'- f'- f'- f'- f'- f'- f'- f'-
ro ro ro ro E N NN N T""" T""" T"""
-gc..c..c..c.. :J -u
a. c: 0> 0> 0> a> c: a> 0> a> 0> a> a> a> 0> 0>
~Q:Q:Q:Q: :::I a> 0) 0) 0> 0> a> 0>0)0>0>0>0>0)0)0)
> ro ro ro ro a.ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro
JjUUUU C'" a> c..CLCLCL JjCLc..CLCLCLCLCLc..c..
w cr:
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF TUKWILA
TOTAL REVENUES & EXPENDITURES
2006-2011 Analysis in OOO's
REVENUES (see A-1) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Totals
General Revenues
Sales Tax 16,674 17,662 18,332 19,132 19,893 20,689 112,382
Property Taxes 10,660 10,937 11,123 11,553 11,784 12,020 68,077
Utility Taxes 3.095 3,861 4,015 4,176 4,343 4,517 24,007
Gambling Taxes 2,300 2,300 2,400 2,400 2,500 2,500 14,400
Franchise Agreement - SCL 1 ,430 1,784 1,856 1,930 2,007 2,087 11,094
Charges/Fees for Services 2,642 3,420 3,037 3,158 3,284 3,415 18,956
Transfers In - Other Funds 2,049 2,131 2,216 2,305 2,397 2,493 13,591
Intergovernmental Revenue 2,265 \ 615 640 665 675 702 5,562
Other Taxes/Miscellaneous 3,130 1,261 1,311 1,364 1,418 1,475 9,959
Cash Carryover 0 300 300 300 300 300 1,500
Subtotal 44,245 44,271 45,230 46,983 48,601 50,198 279,528
Dedicated Revenues (Capital)
Real Estate Taxes 700 750 750 800 850 910 4,760
Motor Vehicle Taxes 405 435 435 455 460 470 2,660
Investment Interest/Misc. 230 230 230 230 230 230 1,380
Property Taxes 130 130 130 130 130 130 780
Parking Taxes 175 175 175 175 175 175 1,050
Transfers from Golf Course 0 100 100 150 150 150 650
Subtotal 1,640 1,820 1,820 1,940 1,995 2,065 11 ,280
TOTAL REVENUE AVAILABLE 45,885 46,091 47,050 48,923 50,596 52,263 290,808
EXPENDITURES
Operations & Maintenance 39,061 40,296 41,890 43,550 45,273 47,059 257,129
(See Attachment B)
Debt Service - 1994 490 490 490 490 490 490 2,940
Debt Service - 1999 & 2000 1,085 1,085 1,085 1,085 1,085 1,085 6,510
Bond Issue - 2003 492 492 492 492 492 492 2,952
Admin/Engineering Overhead 1,038 1,080 1,122 1,168 1,214 1,263 6,885
Subtotal Available 3,719 2,648 1,971 2,138 2,042 1,874 14,392
Capital - Attachment C
Neighborhood Revitalization
Residential Streets 480 350 350 350 350 375 2,255
Parks & Trails/ESA 690 343 88 118 118 218 1,575
Economic Development
Bridges 320 100 100 100 120 120 860
Commercial Streets 7,047 3,547 2,071 3,066 2,161 1 ,460 19,352
General Government
General Improvements 1,690 1,000 800 800 800 800 5,890
Facilities (2,690) 0 0 0 0 0 (2,690)
Subtotal Capital 7,537 5,340 3,409 4,434 3,549 2,973 27,242
Balance by Year (3,818) (2,692) (1,438) (2,296) (1,507) (1,099) (12,850)
Carryover from 2005 16,576 0 0 0 0 0 16,576
Accumulated Totals 12,758 10,066 8,628 6,332 4,825 3,726
VII
12/112005
ATTACHMENT 8
City of Tukwila
General Fund Operations & Maintenance Expenditures
2006-2011 Analysis in OOO's
EXPENDITURES 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Totals
City Council 250 251 261 271 282 292 1,607
Mayor, Boards 1,539 1,590 1,654 1,720 1,789 1,860 10,152
Administrative Services 1,551 1,613 1,678 1,745 1,814 1,887 10,288
Finance 1,547 \ 1,609 1,673 1,740 1,810 1,882 10,261
City Attorney 406 422 439 457 475 494 2,693
Recreation 2,889 2,973 3,092 3,216 3,345 3,478 18,993
Parks 905 941 979 1,018 1,059 1,101 6,003
Community Development 2,513 2,532 2,634 2,739 2,849 2,963 16,230
Municipal Court 982 1,021 1,062 1,105 1,149 1,195 6,514
Police 11,297 11,575 12,038 12,520 13,021 13,541 73,992
Fire 8,871 9,226 9,595 9,979 10,378 10,793 58,842
Public Works 3,407 3,543 3,685 3,832 3,986 4,145 22,598
Street Maintenance 2,407 2,503 2,603 2,708 2,816 2,928 15,965
Dept. 20 Miscellaneous 497 497 497 500 500 500 2,991
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 39,061 40,296 41,890 43,550 45,273 47,059 257,129
Notes:
Most departments are limited to an increase of 4,0% for 2006 and a 4.0% increase is anticipated for
the years 2007-2011 due to the expected increases in healthcare, retirement rates, and general
inflationary pressures. Most of the increases will be related to salaries and benefits Moderate COLAS
are projected along with the normal annual step increases
The Rainy Day contingency and the estimated ending fund balances are not shown here as budgeted
amounts because they are considered reserves to be used in emergencies.
x
12/112005
Attachment C
City of Tukwila
Capital Improvement Program
General Government Project Costs 2006 - 2011 in 000's
12/1/2005
Project
Residential Streets
Page
No. City
1
Neighborhood Enhancements 2
Neighborhood Traffic Calming_ 3
Other Residential Improvements 4
40-42 Ave S(S 160 - S 131 PI) 5
2006 2007
Other City
280
200
Neighborhood Revitalization
2008 2009
Other City Other
350
350
Subtotal by Source 480 0 350
SUBTOTAL Total 480 Total
Parks & Trails/ESA
Parks & Trails
Cascade View Community Park
Tukwila City Pool
Duwamish River Bend Hill Park
Macadam Winter Garden
Fort Dent Park
57th Ave S Park Extension
Tukwila Pond Park
Water Spray Park
Greenbelt Trails
Southgate Park Improvements
Log House Park
Wilcox River Park
Ryan Hill Park
Page
No.
6
7
8
9
10
0 350
350 Total 350
0
2006 2007
City
Other City
50
180
241
11 _ 150
_
12
13 15
14
15
16 _
17
18
19
Endangered Species Act
WRIA 9 - King Conservation Distri 20
Codiga Farm Park & Boat Ramp 21
Riverton Creek Upper Watershed 22
Southgate Creek Park Habitat II 23
Gilliam Crk Fish Barrier Removal 24
Nelson Salmon Habitat 25
Southgate Creek Park Habitat III 26
Riverton Side Channel 27
Southgate Creek Habitat IV 28
Foster Golf Course Riverbank 29
Lower Gilliam Creek Channel 30
Subtotal by Source
SUBTOTAL
14
40
235
605
150
2008
City Other
L.
350
350
Total 350
0
2009
Other City Other City
--■
60
40 360
100
(100) . 100
225
24 18
85
690
Total
24
70
18
2010
City Other
350
2011
City Other
375
Totals After Six
City Other Years
280
1,975 0 375
0 0 1,623
O 0 2,895
350 0 375 0 2,255 0 4,893
Total 350 Total 375 Total 2,255 4,893
2010 20 1
Other City
100
24
18
Other
100
24 18
1,099 343 484
1,789 Total 827
88
Total
24 118 24
112 Total 142
24
118
Total 142
City
Totals After Six
Other City Other Years
100
100
18
100
24
50 0
610 0 100
40 595
241 0
350 705 1,600
O 150 150
(85) 100 2,547
225 0
O 0 30
O 0 90
0 0 200
0 0 150
O 0 650
104 144 42
40 85
0 0 197
0 0 217
0 0 675
0 0 645
0 0 253
0 0 325
O 0 287
0 0 434
O 0 248
24 218 124 1,575 1,779 8,840
Total 342 Total 3,354 8,840
Attachment C
Tukwila
City ° cement Pr °gr6m20�� in 000's
Capital Improvement
mp °°, I ect Costs 2��
Government pr
General ne�elo meet �oo other
page
So.
Project 31 _.� -
grld.es �Rep�irs ""' 32 �,
Annual Bridge Insp B� dge BNRR 33
34
6oe1ng AcceR Access ._ . _. -... _
BASF Reg_ center . Source
Subtotal by
SUBY0TAL
Attachment C
City of Tukwila
General Government Project Costs 2006 201i in 000's
Capital Improvement Program
2010
onornicDe0 Ott
2009
Other
CI
Other
2011
Other
Ts After
otal Six
Other years
25,491
15,608
n7
732_
Tuk Intl Blvd Phase il 016 -1'32) - -39 ... ...--- .
- 645 -17:440- _-_-__-...;. 3,893 1,170 8,333
Project Page
No. Ci
7_ c, 2007
_ c c•
200B -_-_-_--, , ...
S 144th St Phase I (TIB - IvIrlitarY) , 41 " - ' f,084 _ -___ . ......,. .... ---- -., ._ _.., - ..... _
.-. .....- \ 11,303682640 6352866
753 \ I
2006 - -- - --- - --- °ther
Commerciat Streets 35 I
144th St Phase 11(42nd -T1I3) 42 , , rin --''' "1, ... : ij-',
---St3g- 1- - fg •---,1-,Z6.6 -"1,-. " i,6 1,250
-Tukwila Urban Center (Kliddiat.). \ - - .- - _066- ----64' -ii-,06- \-- 296...--1?76_\ _
•...._______ ___ .. .•.... __
Annual Ove ay an Repair 43 j , 2v.,0 1.-A-._ ..„... - - - '•:.:. ,.. I 8.250
1,098 1 , Z400
Southcenter Pkwy (S180.-
S20° 36 521 18,215
"Tukvilla Urban Center nsit Cnti 45 200 210_ _ „ ._. .---. 200 3,350
'Tukwila Urban Center Ped Bridge 46 . loci. _ _ ti•oo , loo .. : 1,20o4o0 1,500 1
Annual-Traffic Signal Program** 47 -- .... _
50 _ . 185, ' I --1-9
.. 200 - 20_0_ 210 0 210
BARIEMW Intersection Paving 48 16 - 1 16 100
Tuk lal Blvd Phaie ill (132 -136) 40 525_ _ 2189_ ..... "..4_ 10,6
-To, irs, Ewa' Phase I 66'6'..
- ..
Interurban (S 143-fort Dent Wy) 49 40 _ .... _2620i, _ -1442 -4750 , I 1,482 5,010
Green RWer Valley Signal Coor 5,0 , - . ._ __ ... .
...-_-_-_. , . .. - 25
,3 22 j
0 1
Southcenter Blvd (1-5 tol1B) 52 \ --600-
.....- ..... - - '4-0.0 I o 7600
l'uk lal Blvd (BAR - S116th Wy) 53 ' - __ , 4 176 ' - 5561 -2,224 600 2,400
Traffic Sig al interconnect . 44 j \ 1098 ., _ 1,5_31: L __
Andover PkElMinkler Blvd .10-6._ ........_ 200 0 ,
Andover Pk V \I (WI( Pkwy - Str ) 55 :_l ,. ._ 100 .....„ .. 100 0 \ 700
E. Marginal Wy (BAR -S112 St) 56 j 3 .__ ..--
35 0
W Valley 1-kwylS 156th Intersectiot 57 ___ 125 '06' \
- - - I 125 600
S 144th Stl3ridge - Sidewalks _ . 51 25 _ -- -- -
tilinIder B APW - SIC Ploivy) 59 425 500 34101905;0 \II\
APEI Industnj Or lnterse • n 60 ,,, _ 190 30
S 133rd StISR599 Intersection . 58 - - ... 45 _ _
s AsotAndover Pk W 1ntersectlon 61 80 - 130 80 0 I 1 13,750
Southcenter Blvd (1-5 - 1st Ave B 63 ■ I 0 0 j j 11;1260705
S168th t (SIC PON - PP- I 62 , I 0
I& Int BlvdIS •116th On Ramp 64 I 0 0\\
Valley (-405-Strander Blvd) 65 I -_-:. .. 0. \ \ \ 580
ROCkerV Replacement Program 66 I I I j 0
0 0 \ 525
Nelsen Place (S 158th - S 156th) 67 , 0 ‘ 200
‘
S 143 Si (lnterurbanZuwarnish) 68. , 0 0 j 100
S 134 St (S133 St - 48 Ave S) 69 j o o I 100
Strander Sd. to SW 27 St , 70 I 0 0
Subtotal by Source 7,047 14,419 3,547 41,802 2071 15,239 3,066 5,551 2 161 3,244 ,460 0 19,352 80 255 37,610
SUBTOTAL. Total 21,466 Total 45,349 Total 17,310 Total 8,617 Total 5,405 Total ,460 Total 99,607 37,610
Attachment C
Page
No.
Project
General Irn rovements
Minor Facilities Irnoroverne
Subtotal by Source
SUBTOTAL
project
Facilities
Tukwila Village
Solid Waste Study
Subtotal by Source
SUBTOTAL
71
SUMMARY
'Totals by Source
PROPOSED-TOTALS
" On-going Projects
City of Tukwila
Capital improvement Pr ogram
General Government Prof ect Costs 20i1 in 000's
2010
2006
Ci
Page
73
74
-16
1 690
Total 1,690
2006
Ci
0
Ci
(2,7ig
Total 810 Total 0
2,690 3,500 0 Total 0
7,537 19,018 5 340 42 286 3,409 15,263 4,434 5575 3,549 3,268 ___1_\_Q97
Total 26,555 Total 47,626 Total 18,672 Total 10,009 Total 6,817 Total 3,
2007
001
1,000
Total 1,000
2007
I
0
Other
Other
800
800
Total 800
CI
2008
Other
2009
Ci
miO-6"
Other
800
Total 800
Ci
2009
C
Other
0
Total 0
0
800
Other
Total 800
C
2010
Other
0
Total 0
Ci
2011
800
800
Other
Total 800
Ci
2011
otter
0
Total 0
CI
Totals After Six
Other Years
800
0 800
5,890
800
Total 5,890
5,890
Ci
Totals
Other
124
After Six
Years
3,500 I 6,100
0 \
6100
3,500
6,100
2,690
Total 810
27,242 85,534
Total 112,776 72,738
ww&~u
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2006-2011 FINANCIAL
PLANNING MODEL AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FOR GENERAL GOVERNMENT AND THE CITY'S
ENTERPRISE FUNDS.
WHEREAS, when used in conjunction with the annual City budget, the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) and the Financial Planning Model for the period 2006-2011 are
resource documents to help plan directions the City will consider for the future; and
WHEREAS, the Financial Planning Model and CIP are not permanent fixed plans, but are
rather guidelines or tools to help reflect future goals and future resources at the time annual
budgets are being planned; and
WHEREAS, the commitment of funds and resources can only be made through the
annual budget process;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The 2006-2011 Financial Planning Mod~i and accompanying Capital
Improvement Program are hereby adopted.
Section 2. The assumptions, revenues and expenditures will be reviewed and updated
annually or as necessary by the City Council.
Section 3. The detail of CIP projects will be reflected in the published Financial Planning
Model and Capital Improvement Program 2006-2011.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a
Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2005
ATIEST/ AUTHENTICATED:
Pamela Linder, Council President
Jane E. Cantu, CMC City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council.
Resolution Number:
By
Office of the City Attorney
c,\tccu"~.ents and Settings\.l\li users\r:eskt.op\Kelly\....sD~.'i';.\Resolutions\Pinanclal Planning fJ'..odel &. elP 200S-2010.dcc
K:',ksn 12/2/2Q05
Page 1 of 1
�,N ii; CO U1NIL A GENDA SYNOPSIS
s p i VI Initials ITEM No.
Q '�1, 0 i I Meeting Date Prepared by 1 Mayor's review Council review
S; re j 1 12/05/05 SH 1 A, 1 L- I
rsoa
S a
1 1
ITEM INFORMATION
I CAS NUMBER: 05-159 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 12/05/05
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Proposed lease agreement with the Way Back Inn Foster House 14239 -42 Ave. S.
CATEGOR Discussion ['Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award E Public Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date gtg Bat Mtg Date
SPONSOR Mayor Adm DCD Fire Legal PAR Police n PW
SPONSOR'S ounc i Svc ce
lease agreement allowing nonpro it Back Innmanage house on 14239- 42 Ave. S.
SUMMARY Way Back Inn provides three months of free transitional housing to pre- screened,
qualifiying homeless families. In return for use of the house, the Way Back Inn and their
extenstive volunteer base will clean up and rehab the property for program use. The city
proposes to pay up to $1200.00 per year of electrical bills.
REVIEWED BY El COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 11/29/05
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR/ADMIN. Approve proposed lease agreement.
COMM I1 LEE Same as sponsor I
COST MR FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$1,200.00 per year max. $1,200.00 per year
Fund Source: GENRAL FUND
Comments:
MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
I MTG. DATA I= ATTACHMENTS
12/c5/05 1 Informational memo dated 11 -15 -05
Proposed lease agreement
Minutes CA &P Meeting 11 -29 -05
I
INFORMATION MEMO
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor Mullet
Stacy Hansen, Human Service Speciahst
11/15/05
Way Back Inn Lease for Foster House
Project No.
ISSUE: Lease Agreement approval for the Way Back Inn referencing, "Foster House" at 14239
42nd Ave. South.
BACKGROUND: A lease agreement for the Way Back Inn referencing, "Foster House" at
14239 42nd Ave. South. This city owned house, North of Foster Library, is currently boarded up.
This lease allows the Way Back Inn, for the term of two years (unless Tukwila Village
development occurs sooner) to maintain, screen and then place qualifying homeless families into
the house for three months of free housing. During their stay, the family works to become self-
sufficient, so they are able to secure stable housing once their three-month stay is up.
We have been funding ($6,000 per year) the Way Back Inn for more than eight years. Currently,
they manage two city owned houses (Hartnett Manor and Kennedy's Cottage) and have been
good stewards of our property. The funding we provide to the Way Back Inn covers the cost of
utilities and materials for needed repairs on those houses. Since Foster House has become
available in the midst of a funding cycle, the city is proposing to cover the electrical costs, as
long as they do not exceed $1200.00 per year.
DISCUSSION/ANAL YSIS/ ALTERNATIVES
RECOMMENDATION: Having a nonprofit agency manage the house allows it to be used
for much needed transitional housing for families, but it also protects the property from squatters,
vandals and keeps it attractive for the rest of the neighborhood.
Attachments: Please note lease is attached.
RESIDENTIAL LEASE - Foster House
,'. " W r-1
I r: i f' I I I r-'
'~I . I.. 'I .
! I.. I <; I ,. I .,
;"j ."/ "\ r'
L., iJ L.. L'L. L
v
II
U
The following agreement identifies a relationship between the Way Back Inn and
the City of Tukwila for the purpose ofprovidmg emergency housing assistance to elIgible
homeless families.
This Lease is made on, between the City of Tukwila, a city, as "Lessor", and The
Way Back Inn, a Washington nonprofit, as "Lessee", as follows:
1. PREMISES, Lessor leases to Lessee the Residence currently situated at 14239
42nd Avenue South, Tukwila, Washington.
2. TERM, The term of this lease shall be for two years, commencing on December
19,2005, and shall terminate in two years, on December 19,2007, in accordance with the
tennination provisions set forth in paragraph 19, unless sooner terminated as a result of
Lessee's default hereunder. The Lessor reserves the right to terminate the lease pnor to
the completion of the two-year time lease at any time for any reason with 60 days notice.
If early termination occurs, the Lessor will reimburse the Lessee for actual cost of
improvements Lessee made to the property up to $5,000.00 maximum with appropriate
receipts. After the initial time frame has expired, Lessee use of property would continue
on a three-month basis,
3. POSSESSION, Lessee shall be deemed to have accepted possession of the leased
premises in an "as-is" condition. Lessor has made no representations to Lessee
respecting the condition of the lease premises.
4. RENT, During the Term hereof, Lessee may occupy the leased premises rent free;
provided, however Lessee shall make all improvements at its sole expense; provided,
such improvements shall be subject to final inspection and the approval of the Lessor,
prior to the occupancy ofthe leased premises, and pay all costs associated with or arising
out of the maintenance and operation of the leased premises as set forth herein.
5. USE, Lessee shall use the leased premises to provIde free, temporary smgle
family dwellings for homeless families with at least one child under fourteen years of
age, and all current uses incidental thereto, and for no other purpose without first
obtaining Lessor's prior written consent.
6. LESSEE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR RESPONSIBILITY, Lessee shall,
when and if needed, at Lessee's sole expense, make repairs to the leased premises and
every part thereof; and Lessee shall maintain the lease premises in neat, clean, sanitary
condition. Tenant shall surrender the leased premises to Lessor in good condition upon
the termination of this Lease, reasonable wear and tear expected.
7. UTILITIES, Lessor shall pay prior to delinquency for all electrical services
supplied to the leased premises, as long as tenant follows energy conservation and
amount doesn't exceed $1,200.00 annually,
8. ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS BY LESSEE, After obtaining the prior
consent of Lessor, Lessee may make, at its sole expense, such additional improvements
of alterations to the leased premises, which it may deem necessary or desirable. Any
repairs or new construction by Lessee shall be done in conformity with plans and
specifications approved by Lessor. All work perfonned shall be done in a workmanlike
manner and shall become the property of the Lessor.
9. LIENS, Lessee shall keep the leased premises free from any hens arising out of
any work perfonned, materials furnished, or obligations incurred by Lessee.
10. INSURANCE, Prior to commencing any improvements and prior to occupancy
under this lease, at no expense to the Lessor, the Lessee shall obtain and furnish to the
Lessor, a certificate of insurance showing general liability insurance coverage including
blanket contractual coverage, which certificate (1) shall be subject to approval of the
Lessor, (2) must fully protect the Lessor from any and all claims and risks in connections
with any activity perfonned by the Way Back Inn and tenant by virtue ofthis Lease, and
(3) must specifically name the L'essor as an additional insured shall be attached to the
certificate of insurance. Such policy must provide the following minimum coverage:
a. Liability insurance written on an occurrence bases with limits no less than
$1,000,000.00 combined single limit per occurrence and $2,000,000.00
aggregate for personal injury, bodily injury and property damage.
Coverage shall include but not limited to blanket contractual;'
products/completed operations; broad fonn property damage; and fire
legal to $100,000.0
b. Lessee shall be responsible for obtaining their own property insurance for
Lessee's personal property,
Any payment of deductible or self-insured retention shall be the sole responsibility of the
Lessee.
The Lessee's insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the Lessor and the Lessor
shall be given 30 days prior written notice of any cancellation, suspension or material
change in coverage.
11. INDEMNIFICATION, The Way Back Inn hereby releases, discharges, defend,
indemnifies and hold hannless the Lessor, and its agents, contractors, and others from
any and all claims, costs (including attorney fees), and liability, arising in any manner,
including, but not limited to, those arising from injury or death to persons or damage to
property occasioned by any act, omission or failure of the Way Back Inn, its officers,
agents employees, whether they be direct or indirect.
12. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING, Lessee shall not assign this lease or any
part thereof, either by operation oflaw or otherwise, without first obtaining the pnor
written consent of Lessor,
13. DEFAULT, Failure by Lessee failure to observe or perfonn any ofthe covenants,
conditions, or provisions of this Lease, where such failure shall contmue for a period of
ten (10) days after written notice from Lessor to cure the default, shall constItute a default
and breach ofthe Lease by the Lessor. Lessee shall notify Lessor promptly of any
default not by its nature necessarily known to Lessor.
14. ACCESS, Lessee shall permit Lessor to enter the leased premises at reasonable
times for the purpose of inspecting the leased premises and ascertaining compliance wIth
the provisions hereof by Lessee, but nothing herein shall be construed as imposing any
obligation on Lessor to perform any such work or duties. Lessor reserves the nght to
property inspection and testing for the Lessor's future development purposes. Lessor will
give Lessee 48 hour notice in the event of access needed for property testing.
15, COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS, Lessee shall, at
its sole cost and expense, promptly comply with all laws, statues, ordinances, and
governmental rules, regulations or requirements now in force or which may hereafter be
in force relating to or affecting the conditions, use, or occupancy of the leased premises.
Lessee shall faithfully observe and comply with the rules and regulation that Lessor shall
from time to time promulgate, including, without limitation, those regulations affecting
signage on the Property. \
16. PERMITS, Lessee shall, at its sole cost and expense, be responsible for obtaining
any permits or licenses that are necessary to perform the work and covenants of this
Lease Agreement.
17. PROPERTY TAXES, Lessor shall be responsible for keeping all property taxed
paid and up to date.
18. NOTICES, All notices under this lease shall be in writing and shall be effective
when mailed by certified mail or delivered to Lessor at the address below stated, or to
Lessee at the address below stated or to such other address as either party may designate
from time to time:
LESSOR:
CITY OF TUKWILA
ATTN: Mayor's Office
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, W A 98188
LESSEE:
Way Back Inn
Post Office Box 621
Renton, WA 98057
19, TERMINATION, Either party has the right to terminate this Agreement if the
other party is in default of any material obligation or representation ofthis Lease which
default is incapable of cure, or which being capable of cure, is not cured within 10 days
after receipt of written notice of such default.
20. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
a. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE OF TillS LEASE.
b. In the event of any action or proceeding brought by either party against the
other under this Lease, the Prevailing party shall be entitled to recover for
the fees of its attorneys in such action or proceeding, including costs of
appeal, if any, in such amount as the court may adjudge reasonable
Attorneys' fees for the purposes of this provision, the terms "action" or
"proceeding" shall include arbitration, administrative, bankruptcy, and
judicial proceedings including appeals therefrom.
c. This Lease shall be construed and governed by the laws of the State of
Washington.
d. Upon termination of this Lease, Lessee shall surrender all keys to the
Resident to Lessor at the place then fixed for notice.
21. AUTHORITY OF LESSEE, Lessee and each individual executing this Lease on
behalf of Lessee represent and warrant that the or she is duly authorized to execute and
deliver this lease, and that this Lease is binging upon Lessee in accordance with Its terms.
22. WAIVER AND FORBEARANCE, No waiver by Lessor of any breach or default
by lessee of any of its obligations or agreement or covenants herein, shall be deemed to
be a waiver of any subsequent breach or default of the same or any other covenant,
agreement or obligation, nor shall forbearance by Lessor to seek remedy for any breach
or default of Lessee be deemed a waiver by Lessor it its rights and remedies wIth respect
of such breach or default.
THIS LEASE IS SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BY LESSOR.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Lease the date
and year above written.
LESSOR:
By:
Its:
Date:
LESSEE:
By:
Its:
Date:
Waybadcinnpropertylease.fosterhouse
Community and Parks Committee
November 29,2005
Present.
Joe Duffie, Chair; Joan Hernandez, Dennis Robertson
Rhonda Berry, EVIe Boykan, Stacy Hansen, Bruce Fletcher, Lucy Lauterbach
;;1<
1. 'Way Back Inn Lease A2reement 'Nay Back Inn currently manages three homes 111 TukwIla:
a duplex (Hartnett Manor) near the Macadam wetlands, and Kennedy's cottage. Another Clty-
owned house IS now being proposed for use by the Way Back Inn group The home IS Just north
of Foster Library on 42nd. The lease allows Way Back Inn to use the house for two years. It
needs some repairs before it can be u,sed as a home, and vVay Back Inn will make those
improvements. The City has a very good relatIonship wIth Way Back Inn, whIch has one part-
time famlly screener staff person and is otherwise staffed by volunteers. The lease agrees to pay
the electnc bills for the house if the bIlls do not exceed $1,200 per year
Joan said the Hartnett Manor had some plIed up junk on its porch for up to six months. There
was also a sofa under a tarp in the yard. Stacy saId this was not usual practice for the group. They
keep furniture to give to familIes when they move out, but the shed they keep the furnIture 111 IS
fairly small. Because the group is eager to begin work on the Foster House, the Comrmttee
recommended the agreement to the December 5th agenda. Recommend authorizin2 mayor's
si2nature on agreement to December 5 meeting.
2. Land Donation on Macadam Land adjacent to the fence for 1-5 is being offered to the City
as a land donation. The 1.34 acres will be kept as a greenbelt. ThIS IS the area that has been the
site of parking and car repairs prevIOusly, and concrete bamers now prevent parking, Bruce and
Rhonda commented that CIty ownership of the property will allow better control of It 111 contrast
to the time when ownershIp was dIfficult to locate. Recommend land acceptance to COW.
~~ Committee chair approval
L L- "lv"-' J.-v""ky
COUNCIL AGENDA Siwosis
-1 4 Marais ITEM No.
-t, k 61 M eeting Date 1 Prepared by Mayor's review 1 C ouna l review 1
a� r 1 11/28/05 1 CK 1
te` t om,
12/5/05 CK
I
L
7908 I 350) I
1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: REF 05-155 IORIG tNALAGENDADATE. NOVEMBER 28, 2005
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Concurrency Ordinance
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearzng Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 11/28/05 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date:
SPONSOR Council Ma Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PW
SPONSOR'S A Concurrency Ordinance is required to implement the level of service (LOS) policies
SUMMARY contained in the Comprehensive Plan update. This ordinance codifies the proposed LOS
standards contained in Tukwila's existing Comprehensive Plan and the proposed update to
the Transportation Element. The steps new development must take in order to receive a
certificate of concurrency for transportation, water, sewer, and surface water are clearly
defined.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 11/14/05
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Forward to COW for discussion and then adoption.
CoMMIIYIEE Forward to COW.
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE 1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
Joint City Council Planning Commission Meetings 6/9/05, 9/8/05, 10/12/05.
11/28/05 1 Rescheduled to 12/5/05.
12/5/05 1
MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS
11/28/05 I Information Memo dated November 18, 2005
1 Ordinance
1 Transportation Committee Meeting Minutes from November 14, 2005
12/5/05 1 Information Memo dated November 30, 2005
1 Ordinance (updated after 11/28/05)
Attachment A -New Project Application Flowchart
1 (Please bring large bound City of Tukwila Transportation Plan)
Transportation Cmte meeting minutes of 11/14/05
P \Cyndy\Concurrency Impact Fees \CAS Concurrency Ord 1I- 28 -05.doc
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor Mullet
Public W orks Directo~
November 30, 2005
Concurrency Ordinance
ISSUE
A Concurrency Ordinance is required to implement the level of service polices contained within
the Comprehensive Plan.
DISCUSSION
State law requires the City of Tukwila to plan under the Growth Management Act (GMA). One
significant update in the City's Comprehensive Plan's Transportation Element is the level of
service (LOS) standard and the methodology used to calculate it. LOS standards for water,
sewer, and surface water are already identified within the existing Comprehensive Plan and are
reiterated in the attached ordinance.
Level of Service measures the quality of traffic flow on the City's roadways. For water, sewer,
and surface water is a measurement of the capacity. Level of service is the guiding principle
behind the City's Concurrency program.. The GMA requires that an adopted LOS standard be
maintained concurrent with growth. Through the planning process, specific new development
and normal background growth are projected over a twenty-year period. For traffic, the
increased volume of trips is then modeled to determine the impacts upon the City's roadways.
From the modeling process, roadway improvements are identified that will maintain the City's
adopted LOS standard. For water, sewer, and surface water systems, increases in flows are
determined through engineering analysis and compared to the system's current capacity.
The proposed ordinance codifies the proposed LOS standards contained in the City's existing
Comprehensive Plan and the proposed update to the Transportation Element. It also clearly
defmes the steps new development must take in order to receive a certificate of concurrency for
transportation, water, sewer, and surface water systems. Attachment A delineates the process
for an applicant seeking a transportation certificate of concurrency,
A new section addressing "vesting, " Section 8, has been added. Applicants who have
submitted either a building permit, entered into "formal" negotiations with the City for a
development agreement, or have a signed agreement in place that addresses traffic concurrency
shall be vested under the laws, rules, and other regulations in effect prior to the date of the
proposed ordinance. The proposed ordinance has been updated to include received comments.
RECOMMENDATION
Refer to the next regular meeting for adoption.
p:\jim\concurrency memo.doc
,.....
I r ,
di'
cJ
Q r\\ ,-]
L~ 0L\ ~
u
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, REGARDING CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act requires that the City adopt and enforce
ordinances "which prohibit development approval if the development causes the level of
service on a locally owned transportation facility to decline below the standards adopted
in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan, unless transportation
improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of development are made
concurrent with the development." (RCW 36.70A070(6)(b); and
WHEREAS, experience implementing the prescribed procedures has indicated a
need to revise the evaluation procedures to ensure concurrency is achieved,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Intent,
A Pursuant to the State Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A, after the adoption
of its Comprehensive Plan, the City of Tukwila is required- by RCW 36,70A070(6)(e) to
ensure that transportation improvements or strategies to accommodate the impacts of
development are provided concurrent with the development. Further, the City is bound
by the planning goals of RCW 36.70A.020 to ensure that public facilities and services
necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time
the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service
levels below locally established minimum standards, hereinafter "concurrency."
B. The intent of this Ordinance is to establish a concurrency management system to
ensure that concurrency facilities and services needed to maintain minimum level of
service standards can be provided simultaneous to, or within a reasonable time after,
development occupancy or use, Concurrency facilities adopted by the City's
Comprehensive Plan are roads, potable water, sanitary sewer, and storm water
management. This Ordinance furthers the goals, policies and implementation strategies
and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
e. The concurrency management system provides the necessary regulatory
mechanism for evaluating requests for development to ensure that adequate concurrency
facilities can be provided within a reasonable time of the development impact. The
concurrency management system also provides a framework for determining facilities
and services needs and provides a basis for meeting those needs through capital facilities
planning,
D For water, sewer, and surface water, the facilities must be in place at the time of
development impact; and for roads, the facilities must be in place within six years of the
time of the development impact. Applicants with developments that would cause the
level of service on concurrency facilities to decline below City standards can have their
developments approved by implementing measures that offset their impacts and would
maintain the City's standard for level of service.
C:\Documents and SeuingslAlI UsersIDesktop\Kellyl.....iSDA T AIOrdinanceslConcurrency.doc
GL:ksn 121212005
Page 1 of8
Section 2, Definitions. The definitions contained in this Ordinance apply
throughout this Ordinance unless, from the context, another meaning is clearly intended,
1. "Adequate" means equal to or better than the level of service standards
specified in the current adopted capital facilities element.
2. "Applicant" means a person who applies for any certificate of concurrency
under this Ordinance and who is the ovmer of the subject property or the authorized
agent of the property
3 "Available water, sewer, and surface water capacity" means there is adequate
capacity, based on adopted level of service standards, for water, sewer, and surface water
facilities currently existing without requiring facility construction, expansion, or
modification,
Code.
4. "Building permit"i refers to any permit issued under the Uniform Building
5. "Certificate of concurrency" means the statement accompanying the Public
Works Department's development standards that are issued with an approved
development permit or the Public Works Department's conditions of approval that are
issued with an approved building permit. The statement shall state that a certificate of
concurrency is issued and indicate:
a. For water, sewer, and surface water, the capacity of the concurrency
facilities that are available and reserved for the specific uses, densities and intensities as
described in the development permit or building permit; and
b For road facilities assigned to the development for the specific uses,
densities and intensities as described in the development permit or building permit;
and
c. Conditions of approval, if applicable; and . ,
d. An effective date; and
e. An expiration date.
6. "ConcurrenClf means facilities or strategies that achieve the City's level of
service standards and that:
a, For water, sewer, surface water, and roads: facilities that exist at the
time development is approved by the Public Works Department; or
b, For roads:
(1) Are included in the City's Capital Improvement Plan at the time
development is approved by the Public Works Department; or
(2) Will be available and complete no later than six years after
completion of the development, and the applicant and/ or the City provides a financial
commitment which is in place at the time the development is approved by the Public
Works Department.
7 "ConcurrenClj facilities" means facilities for which concurrency is required in
accordance with the provision of this Ordinance. They are roads, water, sanitary sewer,
and surface water facilities.
8. "ConcurrenClj test" means:
a. For water, sewer, and surface water, the comparison of a
development's demand to the available capacity of each concurrency facility; and
C:\Documents and Seltings\A1I Users\Desl,:top\Kelly\!vlSDA T AIOrdi nances\Concurrency.doc
GL:ksn 121212005
Page 2 of8
b For roads, the comparison of the development's impact on the level of
service standards of each effected subarea.
A concurrency test must be passed for water, sewer, surface water, and roads,
and a notice issued by the Public Works Department in order to obtain a certificate of
concurrency The concurrency test notice shall be valid for one year
9 "Development permit" means a land use permit and includes short plat,
preliminary or final rezone/reclassification, zoning permit, master plan, shoreline
substantial development permit/conditional use permit, planned unit development, or
any other permit or approval under the Zoning Code or Subdivision Ordinance or
Shoreline Master Program.
10. "Financial commitment" means:
a. Revenue sources anticipated to be available and designated for
facilities in the Comprehensive Plan,
b Unanticipated revenue from federal and state grants for which the City
has received notice of approval,
c. Funding that is assured by the applicant in a form approved by the
Public Works Department.
11. "Level of service standard" means those standards specified in the adopted
transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan. For water, sewer, and surface
water, "level of service standard" also means those standards defined in TMC Title 14.
12. "Non-City managed facilities" include any noncity provider of water or
sewer
13 "Planned capacity" means road facilities that do not exist but for which the
necessary facility construction, expansion, or modification' project is contained in the
current capital facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan, The improvements must be
scheduled to be completed within six years and the financial commitment must be in
place at the time of approval of the certificate of concurrency to complete the
improvements within six years.
14. "Public Works Department" means the Public Works Director or his/her
designee will perform the concurrency test.
15 "Transportation strategies" means transportation demand management
strategies and other techniques or programs that reduce single occupant vehicle travel.
16. "Vested" means the right to develop or continue development in accordance
with the laws, rules, and other regulations in effect at the time the building permit
application is deemed complete,
Section 3. Concurrency Test.
A. Timing. All applicants must apply for the concurrency test and receive notice of
passing the test before the City will consider an application for any development permit
or building permit to be complete.
B Procedures,
1, Applications for concurrency shall be submitted on forms provided by the
Public Works Department. The concurrency test shall be done in order of "first in, first
out," once the Public Works Department determines the application is complete.
2. The applicant shall be responsible to provide to the Public Works
Department a certificate of availability for water and sewer with the concurrency
application submittal if the property is serviced by a non-city managed utility
C:\Documents and SettingsWI Users\DesJ...'1op\KeHyWSDA T A\Ordinances\Concurrency.doc
GLksn 121212005
Page 3 of8
3 The applicant shall submit a detailed project description of the development,
mc!uding location, vehicular circulation, and gross floor area by use, as part of the
concurrency application and concurrency test fee,
4, A concurrency test shall be performed only for specific property, uses,
densities and intensities based on the information provided by the applicant. The
applicant shall specify densities and intensities that are consistent with the uses allowed
for the property If the concurrency test is being requested in conjunction with an
application for rezone, the applicant shall specify densities and intensities that are
consistent with the proposed zoning for the property Changes to the uses, densities and
intensities that create additional impacts on concurrency facilities shall be subject to an
additional concurrency t€st.
5. The Public Works Director or his designee shall perform the concurrency
test. TIle project must receive a passing grade prior to approval of the development
permit or building permit.
6. The Public Works Director or his designees shall notify the applicant of the
test results in writing and shaH notify other City departments of the test results. The date
of written notification to the applicant shall be the date of issuance of the concurrency test
notice.
7 The concurrency test notice shall expire within ninety calendar days of its
issuance unless the applicant submits a SEP A environmental checklist and all required
documentation pursuant to TMC 21,04, together with the site plan, the traffic impact
analysis prepared in accordance with the City's traffic impact analysis guidelines and
containing the traffic information derived from the concurrency test outcome, and the
SEPA review fee. No extensions may be granted for submittal of a complete SEPA
environmental checklist and all required documentation.
8. If the deadline for submittal of a complete SEP A environmental checklist and
all required documentation is met as described above in subsection (7) of this section, the
concurrency test notice shall be valid for one year from Iljhe date of issuance of the
concurrency test notice,
9 The concurrency test notice shall expire unless a certificate of concurrency is
issued or an extension of the notice is granted within one year from the date of issuance of
the concurrency test notice.
10 An applicant must apply for a new concurrency test if the notice expires or
an extension is not granted.
11. The Public Works Director may approve an extension of up to one year if:
a. The applicant submits a letter in writing requesting the extension before
the expiration date. The applicant must show that he/ she is not responsible for the delay
in issuing the certificate of concurrency, and has acted in good faith to obtain a certificate;
and
b. If the property is serviced by a non-City managed utility, then the
applicant must submit a letter from the utility approving the extension before the
expiration date.
12. Once the associated development permit or building permit is approved, the
Public Works Department shaH issue a final certificate of concurrency The concurrency
certificate is valid for a period of 2 years or as long as the developer possesses a valid
building permit for the development.
13 The Public Works Department shall be responsible for accumulating the
impacts created by each application and removing any impacts from the City's
concurrency records for an expired concurrency test notice, an expired development
permit or building permit, a discontinued certificate or other action resulting in an
applicant no longer causing impacts which have been accounted for in the City records.
C:\Documents and Seuings\AII UsersIDesktop\Kellyl1>lSDAT A\Ordinances\Concurrency.doc
GL:ksn 121212005
Page 40[8
14. The Public Works Department shall be responsible to coordinate with
applicable non-City managed utility operators for mcUntenance and monitoring of
available and planned capacity for these utilities,
15. A certificate of concurrency shall apply only to the specific land use, density
and intensity described in the application for a development permit or building permit.
No development shall be required to obtain more than one certificate of concurrency for
each building, unless the applicant or subsequent owner proposes changes or
modifications to the property location, density, intensity, or land use that creates
additional impacts on concurrency facilities.
16. A certificate of concurrency is not transferable to other land, but may be
transferred to new owners of the original land,
Section 4. Test. Development applications that would result in a level of service
reduction below the established standard shall not be approved, For potable water and
sanitary sewer, available system capacity will be used in conducting the concurrency test.
For surface water, the water quality, amount of detention needed, and the system's
conveyance capacity will be used in conducting the concurrency test.
1. For water, sanitary sewer, and the surface water conveyance system, if the
capacity of the concurrency facilities with the development application added is equal to
or better than the capacity required to maintain the established level of service standard,
then the concurrency test is passed. In addition for surface water, the water quality and
detention standards described in the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual
must be met.
2, For roads, the concurrency test compares level of service at intersections or
corridors, as defined in the transportation element, both with and without the
development at a time 6 years after the estimated occupancy of the development. If the
level of service is equal to or better than the level of service standard, the concurrency test
is passed.
I,
i
3. If the concurrency test is not passed for water, sewer, surface water, or roads,
then the applicant may retest for concurrency after doing one or both of the following:
a. Modifying the application to reduce the need for the non-existent
concurrency facilities. Reduction of need can be through the reduction of the size of the
development, reduction of trips generated by original proposed development, or phasing
of the development to match future concurrency facility construction, or
b. Arranging to fund the improvements for the additional capacity
required for the concurrency facilities, as approved by the Public Works Director.
Section 5. Concurrency for Phased Development.
A An applicant may request concurrency for a phased development if the Public
Works Director determines that the two criteria described below in Subsection B of this
Section are met. The application for concurrency must be accompanied by a schedule for
construction of the buildings, parking and other improvements and by a written request
for the development to be considered in phases.
B. The Public Works Director or his designee may approve concurrency for phased
development if both of the following criteria are met:
1. No associated development permit is required before building permit
applications can be submitted, and
2, The application is for an integrated development site plan with multiple
buildings that are interdependent for vehicular and pedestrian access and parking.
C. A concurrency application for phased development shall follow the same timing
and procedure as set forth in this Ordinance, except that:
C:\Documents and SettingslAlI UserslDesktoplKellyl/l.-!SDA T A\Ordinances\Concurrency.doc
GL.ksn 121212005
Page 5 of8
1 Only one concurrency test notice shall be issued for all buildings proposed
for phased development;
2. Each building approved for phased development shall be issued a certificate
of concurrency at the same time as the building permit;
3, The concurrency test notice for an approved phased development shall be
valid for five years from the date of its issuance; provided that a certificate of concurrency
is issued for a building within one year of the date of issuance of the concurrency test
notice or within two years if an extension is timely requested and the request is granted.
D The Public Works Director or his designee may approve an extension of up to
one year for obtaining the first certificate of concurrency and the final certificate of
concurrency for the phased development, consistent with the terms of this Ordinance.
E. In no case shall the cqncurrency test notice be valid for more than six years from
the date of issuance of the notice. The applicant must apply for a new concurrency test for
any building approved for phased development that has not been issued a building
permit within six years from the date of issuance of the concurrency test notice.
Section 6. Public Notice of Concurrency Test.
A. The Public Works Director or his designee shall cause notice of issuance of the
concurrency test notice to be given in the same manner and at the same time as the SEP A
public notice of TMC 21.04.
B The notice shall include the name of the applicant, the City file number, the
address and description of the development and the procedures for filing an appeal.
Section 7. Exemptions. The requirement for a concurrency test shall not apply to
single family building permits, multi-family building permits for projects containing four
or fewer units, short plats, or any non-residential project that is categorically exempt from
SEPA pursuant to TMC 21.04.080, 100, or .110. The Public Works Department shall also
waive compliance for a traffic concurrency test for other prdjkts which will not generate
more than 30 net new "p.m, peak hour" traffic trips.
Section 8. Vesting. Applicants shall be vested under the laws, rules and other
regulations in effect prior to the effective date of this ordinance if they have, prior to the
effective date of this ordinance:
1. Submited a building permit application that the City has deemed complete;
or
2. Entered into formal negotiations with the City for a development agreement
in accordance with RCW 36,70B 170 through 36.70B.21O; or
3 Have a signed agreement with the City that is still in effect.
Section 9. Improvements to Concurrency Facilities.
A. The City shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, adequate facilities
through construction of needed capital improvements in implementing strategies which
do the following:
1. Achieve level of service standards for anticipated future development and
redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development and building permits;
and
2. Repair or replace obsolete or deteriorating facilities.
B Improvements to the facilities shall be consistent with the transportation element,
utilities element and Capital Improvement Program of the Comprehensive Plan.
C:\Documents and Settings\A1I Users\Desktop\Kelly\MSDA T A\Ordinances\Concurrency.doc
GL:ksn 121212005
Page 6 of8
Section 10. Capital Facilities Plan and Capital Improvement Program. The City
shall include in the capital appropriations of its budget for expenditure during the
appropriate fiscal year financial commitments for all capital improvement projects
required for level of service standards, except the City may omit from its budget any
capital improvements for which a binding agreement has been executed with another
party to provide the same project in the same fiscal year.
Section 11. Intergovernmental Coordination.
A. The City may enter into agreements with other local goverrunents, applicable
non-City managed utilities, King County, the state of Washington, and other facility
providers to coordinate the imposition of level of service standards and other mitigations
for concurrency
B The City may apply standards and mitigations to development in the City that
impacts other local jurisdictions. The City may agree to accept and implement conditions
and mitigations that are imposed by other jurisdictions on development in their
jurisdiction that impact the City
Section 12. Administrative Rules and Procedures. The Public Works Department
shall be authorized to establish administrative rules and procedures for administering the
concurrency test system. The administrative rules and procedures shall include but not
be limited to application forms, necessary submittal information, processing times, and
issuance of the concurrency test notice and the certificate of concurrency
Section 13. Appeals.
A. Procedures. The applicant may appeal the results of the concurrency test based
on three grounds:
1. a technical error;
2, the applicant provided alternative data or a traffic mitigation plan that was
rejected by the City; or I J
3. delay in review and approval caused solely by the City that allowed capacity
to be given to another applicant. The applicant must file a notice of appeal with the
Public Works Department within 15 days of the notification of the test results. The notice
of appeal must specify the grounds thereof, and must be submitted on the form
authorized by the Public Works Department. Each appeal must be submitted with the
appeal fee set forth in TMC 18.108.020,
B. Hearing Schedule and Notification. When the appeal has been filed v.rithin the
time prescribed, in proper form, with the appropriate data and payment of the required
fee, the Public Works Department shall transmit the appeal to the hearing examiner for
scheduling. Notice of the public hearing shall be given to the applicant at least 15 days
prior to the hearing date.
C. Record. The Public Works Department shall transmit to the Hearing Examiner
all papers, calculations, plans and other materials constituting the record of the
concurrency test, at least 7 days prior to the scheduled hearing date. The Examiner shall
consider the appeal upon the record transmitted, supplemented by any additional
competent evidence, which the parties in interest may desire to submit.
D Burden of Proof. The burden of proof shall be on the appellant to show by a
preponderance of the evidence that the Public Works Director was in error
Section 14. SEP A Exemption, A determination of concurrency shall be an
administrative action of the City of Tukwila that is categorically exempt from the State
Environmental Policy Act.
C:\Documents and Seltings\A1I Users\Desktop\Kelly\MSDATA\Ordinances\Concurrency.doc
GL:ksn 121212005
Page 7 of8
Section 15. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 16. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published
in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days
after passage and publication as provided by law
PASSED BY THE CI1Y COUNCIL OF THE CI1Y OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of .2005
ATIEST/ AUTHENTICATED'
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council.
Published:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number:
Office of the City Attorney
, ,
C:\Documenls and Settings\i\.1t Users\Desktop\Kell)'\.l\fSDATA\Ordinan~\Concurrency.doc
GL:ksn 121212005
Page 80f8
ATTACHMENT A
New Project Application
Concurrency
test required
No concurrency
test needed
_0- --<i5f~~~{~~-~ -~ ~~}t~~;<lz~'t ~~ --
Proceed wiur"
:::~;--:,O>-'_ ~ ___ _ __
.~~reVi~wP!oce~~
Reduce impacts
· smaller development
· reduce number of trips
· phase development
Mitigate impacts
0'_.,..- n.....'_... ,,-___c. ,
i~l\i~~I.
Transportation Committee
November 14,2005
Present:
Jim Haggerton, Chair; Joe Duffie, Pam Carter
Jim Morrow, Jack Pace, Rebecca Fox, C)-TIdy Kmghton, Derek Speck, LIsa
Verner, Lucy Lauterbach; Chuck Parrish, Steve DiJulIo-Foster Pepper &
Shefelman, Dave Markly, Brent Carson- Buck & Gordon, Sue Carlson, Dave
Kautz, Mark Segale
1. Transportation Element Rebecca explained the process of how the Transportation Element
IS updated as part of the Comprehensive Plan. Updates can only occur once a year. A Transit
Plan and Comprehensive Transportation Plan wIll be included in thIS update. The Planning
Commission held a public heanng 011 the Element. The TransportatIOn Element will gUIde the
City's transportation needs 111 the next few years, and will provide a framework for imp lementing
ordinances on concurrency and impact fees. Recommend Transportation Comprehensive
Plan Element to COW.
*'
2. Concurrency Ordinance The State Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that an
adopted Level of Service standard be mamtained as growth occurs. This is done through a
Concurrency Ordinance. Concurrency will be required in transportation, water, sewer, and
surface water. Not only capacity IS required to keep up with growth, but in water, water qualIty
must also be considered.
The mayor told representatives ofTukwlla South (TS) and the Westfield Shoppingtown(the
Mall) that the City would address their traffic mitigation though th~Ir Developer Agreements and
the proposed Impact Fee ordinance would not be applied to their developments. Both developers
had suggested language that could be added to the Concurrency and Impact Fee ordmances. JIm
Morrow had reservations about naming developments in ordmances that implement the
Transportation Element of the Comp Plan. Three options were suggested: inserting language to
exempt TS, the Mall, and the Penney's redevelopment; delaying adoption of the two
implementing ordinances; or having a transition time for the new ordmance to be put into full
effect. The Concurrency and the Impact Fee ordmances would go into effect at year's end unless
a change is made. JIm H expressed concern about the number of "must" and "shall" provIsions
throughout the Concurrency ordinance. Pam asked that a provIsion under the Concurrency Test
procedures be clarified. The Committee members asked that the CIty Attorney give a clear
explanation of how this and the Impact Fee ordinance related to the developer agreements that
are in process now, and optIons for addressing that issue Recommend ordinance and options
to CO\V.
3. Impact Fee Ordinance Impact fees were discussed in the joint meetings of the Plmming
Commission and CouncIl. Cyndy Said they had decided finally on having four areas for impact
fee levels. Zone 1 is the Urban Center; Zones 2 & 3 are residential (though they mclude TIB and
Interurban busmesses), and Zone 4 includes Ryan Hill and the industnal area in the north part of
the City. Ryan Hill was included m Zone 4 because their main access is through the industnal
area. Because most of the projects III the SIX coming years are known about, Cyndy IS able to
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
�y butzak ITEM NO.
p 1� t Cil 1 ttileettng Date 1 Prepared by 1 Mayor's review Council reutew
cci iii r I 11/28/05 I CK 1
t :tr 12/5/05 A� 1 1
I I CUM) C
1 1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER. REF 05-156 IORIGINALAGENDADATE: NOVEMBER 28, 2005
AGENDAITEMTITLE Impact Fee Ordinance
CA I'EGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Btd Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 11/28/05 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date:
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PIV
SPONSOR'S This Ordinance repeals TMC 9.48 regarding Transportation Impact Fees and establishes a
SUMMARY new TMC 9.48 regarding Transportation Concurrency Standards and Impact Fees. This
new impact fee program has been developed in line with GMA and SEPA. The impact fee
schedule has been developed through identification of future roadway improvements
necessary to maintain Tukwila's adopted concurrency standard along with a fiscally
constrained funding mechanism.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DA'T'E: 11/14/05
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Forward to COW for discussion and then adoption.
Comma EE Forward to COW.
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE 1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
(Joint City Council Planning Commission Meetings 6/9/05, 9/8/05, 10/12/05.
11/28/05 1 Rescheduled to 12/5/05.
12/5/05 I
1 1
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
11/28/05 Information Memo dated November 18, 2005
Ordinance
Map of Impact Fee Zones Impact Fee Schedule
Transportation Committee Meeting Minutes from November 14, 2005
12/5/05 Same Information Memo dated November 18, 2005
1 Ordinance (updated after 11/28/05) plus map of fee zones Impact Fee Schedule
1 Transportation Cmte meeting minutes of 11/14/05
1 (Please bring large bound City of Tukwila Transportation Plan)
H:\PUBWORKS\Cyndy\Concurrency Impact Fees \CAS Impact Fee Ord 12-05-05.doe
INFOR1V1ATIONAL MEMORUNDUI\tl
To:
Mayor Mullet
Public Works Directo~
November 18, 2005
Impact Fees
From:
Date:
Subject:
ISSUE
Proposed ordinance modifying the Impact Fee ordinance and establishing a new impact fee schedule.
BACKGROUND
State law requires the City of Tukwila to plan under the Growth Management Act (GMA). A substantial
update to the Transportation Element has been proposed for adoption this year that includes an updated
transportation impact fee schedule. The impact fee schedule has been developed through identification of
future roadway improvements necessary to maintain the City's adopted concurrency standard and a fiscal
analysis on how much funding capability Tukwila will have. Impact fees are one tool allowed under GMA to
finance necessary roadway improvements.
RCW 82.02.909 defines Impact Fees as ".. a means of payment of money imposed upon development as a
condition of development approval to pay for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development,
that is reasonably related to the new development that creates addItional demand and need for public facilIties,
that is a proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities, and that is used for facilities that reasonably
benefit the new development."
Basic information on concurrency and impact fees was presented at Transportation Committee meetings on
1/24,2/14, and 2/23. Additionally, there have been three joint briefmgs with the City Council and Planning
Commission on the proposed Transportation Element, with the last briefmg of 10/12 focusing on the impact
fee topic.
ANALYSIS
The first attached matrix shows the prt>jects per zone, which are identified in the proposed 2006 CIP as
having funds, expended within the next 6 years. Since impact fees must be calculated after all other sources
of funding have been accounted for, the amount being collected under Impact Fee Cost. Further, since the
City must pay for the impacts of existing volumes as well as regional growth utilizing city facilities, only
those trips which are new to each zone which are associated with new growth in the zone has been identified
using the City's EMME/2 model.
The second matrix shows the cost per trip amount by zone that can be collected through new development.
This matrix also shows adjustments made for new trips associated with development and trip length. By using
these adjustments, staff believes the most accurate and true evaluation of actual impacts to the City's street
network is achieved.
A new section addressing "vesting," Section 16, has been added. Applicants who have submitted either a
building permit, entered into "formal" negotiations with the City for a development agreement, or have a
signed agreement in place that addresses traffic concurrency and impact fees shall be vested under the laws,
rules, and other regulations in effect prior to the date of the proposed ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION
Refer on to the next regular meeting for adoption.
p:\jim\impact fee memo. doc
r;-j f;\ '^\ R IT
iliJ U J lY-d If U
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, REGARDING CONCURRENCY STANDARDS AND
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 2043;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila has adopted a Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the
Growth Management Act of the State of Washington and RCW 36.70A, which includes as
part of the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan elements relating to traffic
impacts and necessary mitigation; and
WHEREAS, RCW 82,02.050 authorizes cities to impose impact fees on development
activity as part of the financing for public facilities, including transportation facilities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila has adopted a Transportation
Element of its Comprehensive Plan, including transportation facilities, and desires to
provide funding for said plan through the imposition of development impact fees;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Concurrency Standards and TransportatiQn Impact Fees Amended.
Ordinance No. 2043, as codified at Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 948, is hereby
amended to read as follows:
sP('tinnc:~
9 48,010
9 48.020
9 48.030
9.48.040
9 48.050
9 48.060
9 48.070
9 48.080
948.090
948.100
948.110
948.120
9 48.130
9.48.140
948.150
948.160
CHAPTER 9.48
CONCURRENCY STANDARDS AND
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES
Authority and Purpose
Definitions
Imposition of Transportation Impact Fees
Calculation of Impact Fees
Credit
Time of Payment of Impact Fees
Adjustments
Establishment of Impact Fee Account
Use of Impact Fees
Plan and Fee Update
Refunds
Appeals
Exemptions
Vesting
Authority Unimpaired
Relationship to SEP A
C:\Documents and Seltings\A1I Users\Desl,top\Kelly\MSDA T A\Ordinance>\Jmpact Fees.doc
GL:ksn 12/212005
Page 1 of7
9.48,010. Authority and Purpose,
A. Authority The City of Tukwila's impact fee financing program has been
developed pursuant to the City of Tukwila's police powers, the Growth Management Act
as codified in Chapter 36,70A of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), the enabling
authority in RCW Chapter 82.02, RCW Chapter 58.17 relating to platting and subdivisions
and the State Environmental Policy Act (SEP A), and RCW Chapter 42.12C.
B Purpose. The purpose of the financing plan is to:
1. Develop a program consistent with Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan, the Six
Year Transportation Program and the Capital Improvement Program, for joint public and
private financing of transportation improvements necessitated in whole or in part by
development within the City of Tukwila, and
2. Ensure adequate, levels of transportation and traffic service consistent with
the level of service identified ill the Comprehensive Plan, and
3 Create a mechanism to charge and collect fees to ensure that new
development bears its proportionate share of the capital costs of transportation facilities
necessitated by new development; and
4. Ensure fair collection and administration of such transportation impact fees,
C. The provisions of the City of Tukwila's impact fee ordinance shall be liberally
construed to effectively carry out its purpose in the interests of the public health, safety
and welfare.
9.48.020. Definitions. The following words and terms shall have the following
meanings for the purposes of this Ordinance, unless the context dearly requires
otherwise, Terms or words not defined herein shall be defined pursuant to RCW
82.02.090 when given their usual and customary meaning.
1. The" Act" means the Growth Management Act, Chapter 17, Laws of 1990,
First Extraordinary Session, Chapter 36.70A RCW et seq., and Chapter 32, Laws of 1991,
First Special Session, as now in existence or hereinafter amended.
2, "Building permit" means an official document or certification of the City of
Tukwila issued by the City's building official which authorizes the construction,
alteration, enlargement, conversion, reconstruction, remodeling, rehabilitation, erection,
placement, demolition, moving, or repair of a building or structure.
3 "City" means the City of Tu1.'Wila, Tukwila, Washington,
4. "Development" means the construction, reconstruction, conversion,
structural alteration, relocation or enlargement of any structure that requires a building
permit.
5. "Development activity" means any construction of a building or structure
that creates additional demand and need for transportation facilities.
6, "Development approval" means any written authorization from the City,
which authorizes the commencement of the "development activity "
7 "Letter encumbered" means to reserve, set aside, or earmark the impact fees
in order to pay for commitments, contractual obligations, or other liabilities incurred for
the provision of transportation facilities,
8. "Fee payer" is a person, corporation, partnership, an incorporated
association or governmental agency, municipality, or similar entity commencing a land
development activity, which requires a building permit and creates a demand for
additional facilities.
C:\Documents and Seuings\A1I Users\Desktop\Kelly\MSDATA\Ordinancesllmpact Fees.doc
GL:ksn 121112005
Page 2 of7
9 "Impact fee" means the payment of money imposed by the City on
development activity pursuant to this Ordinance as a condition of granting development
approval in order to pay for the transportation facilities needed to serve new growth and
development that is a proportionate share of the cost of the capital facilities that is used
for facilities that reasonably benefit new development. Impact fees are independent of a
permit fee} an application fee} a concurrency test fee} and the administrative fee for
collecting and handling impact fees or cost of reviewing independent fee calculations.
10. "Owner" means the owner of record of real property, as found in the records
of King County, Washington, or a person with an unrestricted vvritten option to purchase
property; provided} that if the real property is being purchased under a recorded real
estate contract, the purchaser shall be considered the owner of the property
11. "Proportionate fair share" means that portion of the cost for transportation
facility improvements that are reasonably related to the service demands and needs of
new development.
12. "Vested" means the right to develop or continue development in accordance
with the laws} rules, and other regulations in effect at the time the building permit
application is deemed complete,
9.48.030. Imposition of Transportation Impact Fees.
A. The City hereby authorizes the assessment and collection of impact fees on
development activity at the rates set forth in attachment A incorporated herein by this
reference.
B Transportation impact fees imposed by this Ordinance:
1. Shall only be imposed for system improvements that are reasonably related
to the new development;
2, Shall not exceed the proportionate fair s~e of the costs of system
improvements that are reasonably related to the new development;
3. Shall be used for the system improvements that will reasonably benefit new
development;
4. May be collected and spent only for system improvements, which are
provided for in the transportation element of the Capital Improvement Plan and
Comprehensive Land Use Plan}
5 Shall not be used to correct existing transportation system deficiencies as of
the date of adoption of this Ordinance; and
6. Shall be collected only once for each development unless changes or
modifications to the development are proposed which result in greater direct impacts on
transportation facilities than were considered when the development was first approved.
9.48.040. Calculation of Impact Fees.
A. The method of calculating the transportation impact fees in this Ordinance
incorporate} among other things, the following:
1. The cost of public streets and roads necessitated by new development;
2. An adjustment to the costs of the public streets and roadways for past or
future mitigation payments made by previous development to pay for a particular system
improvement that was prorated to the particular street improvement;
3. The availability of other means of funding public street and roadway
improvements; and
C:\Documents and Senings\A1I UserslDesk!opIKelly\MSDATA\Ordinances\Impact Fees.doc
GL:ksn 121112005
Page 3 of7
4. The methods by which public street and roadway improvements were
financed.
B Fees for development shall be calculated based on their net new p,m. peak hour
trip generation rates as determined by the Public Works Director, or designee, applying
the lTE Trip Generation Manual, If the proposed development activity concerns an
existing use, the fee shall be based on net new trips generated by the redevelopment. If an
existing building has not been used for its intended purpose or has been vacant for twelve
months or more preceding application, no credit for existing trips shall be given.
9.48.050. Credit. A credit, not to exceed the impact fee otherwise payable, shall be
provided for the fair market value of any dedication of land for, improvement to, or new
construction of any system improvements provided by the developer, to facilities that are
identified in the Capital Improvement Program and that are required as a condition of
approving the development activity The determination of "value" shall be consistent
with the assumptions and methodology used by the City in estimating the capital
improvement costs.
9.48.060. Time of Payment of Impact Fees.
A. The impact fees imposed pursuant to this Ordinance shall be assessed by the City
at the time of the application for the development permit, and shall be due and payable in
whole at the time of issuance of such permit. The fee paid shall be the amount in effect as
of the date of the permit issuance.
B Impact fees may be paid under protest in order to obtain a permit or other
approval of development activity
9.48.070. Adjustments.
A. The amount of fee to be imposed on a particular development may be adjusted
by the Public Works Director giving consideration to studies and other data submitted by
the developer demonstrating by clear and convincing eviden<;e that an adjustment should
be made in order to carry out the purposes of this Ordinance. '
B The Public Works Director shall review the study to determine if the adjustment
request:
1. Is based on accepted impact fee assessment practices and methodologies;
2. Uses acceptable data sources and if the data used is comparable with the
uses and intensities planned for the proposed development activity;
3 Complies with the applicable state laws governing impact fees;
4. Is prepared and documented by professionals who are mutually agreeable to
the City and the developer and are qualified in their respective fields; and
5 Shows the basis upon which the independent fee calculation was made,
C. In reviewing the study, the Public Works Director may require the developer to
submit additional or different documentation. If the Public Works Director agrees with
the study's findings, an adjustment to the impact fee will be made, If a compelling case
has not been made, the developer shall pay the full impact fee amount.
D A developer requesting an adjustment or independent fee calculation may pay
the impact fees imposed by this Ordinance to obtain a building permit while the City
determines whether to partially reimburse the developer by making an adjustment or
accepting the independent fee calculation.
9.48.080. Establishment of Impact Fee Account. Impact fees received pursuant to
this Ordinance shall be earmarked and retained in special interest-bearing accounts. All
C:\Documents and Scttings\A1I Users\Desktop\Kelly\1"!SDATA\Ordinancesllmpact Fees.doc
GL:ksn 12/112005
Page 40[7
interest shall be retained in the account and expended for the purpose or purposes for
which the impact fees were collected.
9.48.090. Use of Impact Fees.
A. Pursuant to this Ordinance, impact fees shall be used for facilities that will
reasonably benefit the City and its residents.
B. Fees shall not be used to make up deficiencies in City facilities serving an existing
development.
e. Fees shall not be used for maintenance and operations, including personnel.
D Traffic impact fees shall be used for but not limited to land acquisition, site
improvements, engineering and architectural services, permitting, financing,
administrative expenses an<?- applicable mitigation costs, and capital equipment
pertaining to transportation systems and facilities.
E. Traffic impact fees may also be used to recoup public improvement costs
incurred by the City to the extent that new growth and development will be served by the
previously constructed improvement.
F In the event bonds or similar debt instruments are or have been issued for system
improvements, impact fees may be used to pay the principal on such bonds,
G. Transportation impact fees shall be expended or letter encumbered for a
permissible use within six years of receipt, unless there exists an extraordinary or
compelling reason for fees to be held longer than six years. The Public Works Director
may recommend to the Council that the City hold fees beyond six years in cases where
extraordinary or compelling reasons exist. Such reasons shall be identified in written
findings by the Council,
H, The Finance Director shall prepare an annual report on the transportation impact
fee account showing the source and amount of all moneys 'cbllected, earned or received
and projects that were financed in whole or in part by transportation impact fees.
9.48.100. Plan and Fee Update. The impact fee may be updated annually to evaluate
the consistency of development density assumptions, estimated project costs and adjusted
for awarded grant funding, if any Updates that result in a change in impact fees will be
reviewed by the City Council. Impact fee changes will only occur through an ordinance
requiring Council action.
9.48.110. Refunds.
A. A developer may request and shall receive a refund when the developer does not
proceed with the development activity for which transportation impact fees were paid,
and the developer shows that no impact has resulted,
B. The developer must submit a request for a refund to the City in writing within
one year of the date the right to claim the refund arises. Any transportation impact fees
that are not expended or encumbered within the time limitations established, and for
which no application for a refund has been made within this one-year period, shall be
retained and expended on any project identified in the Capital Improvement Plan.
e. In the event that transportation impact fees must be refunded for any reason,
they shall be refunded with interest earned to the applicant.
9.48.120. Appeals.
A. Any fee payer may pay the impact fees imposed by this Ordinance under protest
in order to obtain a building permit.
C:illocuments and Seuings\r'\1I Usersillesktop\Kelly\MSDA T A\Ordinanees\Impaet Fees.doc
GL:ksn 12/1/2005
Page 5 of7
B. Appeals regarding traffic impact fees imposed on any development activity may
only be taken by the fee payer of the property where such development activity will
occur No appeal shall be permitted unless and until the impact fee at issue has been
paid.
C. Determinations of the Public Works Director, or his designee with respect to the
applicability of traffic impact fees to a given development activity, or the availability of a
credit, can be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner pursuant to this Section.
D An appeal shall be taken within 10 working days of payment of the impact fees
under protest or within 10 working days of the "City's issuance of a written determination
of a credit or exemption decision by filing with the City a notice of appeal giving the
reasons for the appeal with an accompanying appeal fee as set forth in the existing fee
schedule for land use decisions.
E. Appeals under this, Ordinance will be processed in accordance with the
procedures set forth in TMC 1~U08.020,
9.48.130. Exemptions. Impact fees are generated from the formula for calculating the
fees as set forth in this Ordinance. The amount of an impact fee is determined by the
information contained in the adopted transportation element, as appended to the City's
Comprehensive Plan, All new development located in the City that generates net new
p.m. peak hour trips will be charged a traffic impact fee. The following exemptions shall
apply'
1. Any non-residential project that is categorically exempt from SEP A pursuant
to TMC 21.04,080, 100, or 110.
2. Projects that will not generate net new traffic trips;
3 Should the City reduce or waive any impact fees, not subject to Section 9.0 of
this Chapter, as part of a negotiated developer's agreement, those waived or reduced fees
shall be paid from the City's funds.
, J
9.48.140. Vesting, Applicants shall be vested under the laws, rules and other
regulations in effect prior to the effective date of this ordinance if they have, prior to the
effective date of this ordinance:
2. Submitted a building permit application that the City has deemed complete;
or
3 Entered into formal negotiations with the City for a development agreement
in accordance with RCW 36.708.170 through 36.70B.210; or
4, Have a signed agreement that is still in effect with the City addressing traffic
concurrency and impact fees.
9.48.150. Authority Unimpaired. Nothing in this Ordinance shall preclude the City
from requiring the feepayer to mitigate adverse and environmental effects of a specific
development pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, Chapters 43.21C RCW
and/ or Chapter 58,17 RCW, governing plats and subdivisions; provided, that the exercise
of this authority is consistent with Chapters 43.21C and 82.02 RCW
9.48.160. Relationship to SEP A.
A. All development shall be subject to environmental review pursuant to SEP A and
other applicable City ordinances and regulations.
B. Payment of the impact fee pursuant to this Ordinance shall constitute satisfactory
mitigation of those traffic impacts related to the specific improvements identified on the
project list.
C:\DocumenlS and SetlingslAlI Users\Desktop\KeIlY""ISDA T A\Ordinancesl/mpact Fees.doc
GL:ksn 121112005
Page 6 of7
C. Further mitigation in addition to the impact fee shall be required for identified
adverse impacts appropriate for mitigation pursuant to SEP A that are not mitigated by an
impact fee.
D Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed to limit the City's authority to deny
development permits when a proposal would result in significant adverse traffic impacts
identified in an environmental impact statement and reasonable mitigation measures are
insufficient to mitigate the identified impact.
Section 2. Repealer. Ordinance No. 2048, as codified at Tukwila Municipal Code
Chapter 9 48, is hereby repealed in its entirety
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published
in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days
after passage and publication as provided by law
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of .2005.
A ITEST / AUTHENTICATED'
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council.
Published:
Effective Date: . ;
Ordinance Number:
Office of the City Attorney
C:\DocumenlS and Settings\A1I Users\Desktop\Kelly\!"ISDATA\Ordinances\Impact Fees.doc
GL:ksn 12/112005
Page 7 of7
~
6)
ctW o11U\<'N\\2<
Impact Fee zones
Map
!lOT TO sc.u-E
-
ATTACHMENT A
Impact Fee Schedule 2006
Land Uses Unit of Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
Measure Zone 4
Cost per Trip> $1,424 71 $1,34546 $1,071 73 $807 07
Residential
Single Family dwelling $1,36118 $1,28546 $1,02394 $771 08
Multi Family dwelling $826 33 $780 37 $621 60 $468 10
Retirement Community dwelling $291 10 $27491 $21898 $164 90
Nursing Home/Convalescent Center bed $215 63 $203 64 $162.21 $122.15
Assisted LivinQ , dwelling $183.29 $17309 $13788 $103 83
Commercial - Services
Drive-in Bank sq fUGFA $1898 $17 92 $14.28 $1075
Walk-in Bank sq fUGFA $1532 $1447 $11.52 $868
Day Care Center sq fUGFA $762 $7.20 $574 $4.32
Library sq fUGFA $348 $3.29 $262 $197
Post Office sq fUGFA $530 $500 $3.98 $300
Hotel/Motel room $908 73 $858 19 $683 59 $51478
Service Station VFP $3,81237 $3,60031 $2,867 84 $2,15964
Service Station/Minimart VFP $2,627 55 $2,481 40 $1,976.56 $1,48846
Service Station/Minimart'Car Wash VFP $3,885 36 $3,669.24 $2,922.74 $2.20099
Carwash (Self-Serve) Stall $2,31866 $2,18969 $1,744.20 $1,31348
Movie Theater screen $33,521.55 $31,65697 $25,216 45 $18,98937
Health Club sq fUGFA $385 $364 $290 $2.18
Racquet Club sq fUGFA $1 64 $154 $1.23 $093
Marina Berth $202.92 $191 64 $152 65 $11495
Commercial - Institutional
Elementary School/Jr. High School student $160.18 $151.27 $120 50 $90 74
High School student $107.82 $101 82 $81 1 0 $61.08
University/College student $219 48 $207.27 $16510 $12433
Church sq fUGFA $094 $089 $071 $053
Hospital sq fUGFA $142 $1.34 $107 $0.80
Commercial - Restaurant
Restaurant sq fUGFA $784 $741 $5.90 $444
Fast Food Restaurant wlo drive thru sq fUGFA $1007 $951 $757 $5.70
Fast Food Restaurant w drive/thru sq fUGFA $1289 $12.17 $970 $730
Industrial
Light Industry/High Technoloqy sq fUGFA $1 92 $182 $1.45 $1 09
Industrial Park sq fUGFA $1 81 $1 71 $136 $1 02
Warehousing/Storage sq fUGFA $100 $095 $075 $057
GLA= Gross Leasible Area
GFA= Gross Floor Area
VFP= Vehicle Fueling Positions (Maximum number of vehicles that can be fueled simultaneously)
page 1 of 2
ATTACHMENT A continued
Impact Fee Schedule 2006
Land Uses Unit of Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4
Measure
Cost per Trip> $1,42471 $1,34546 $1,071 73 $807 07
Commercial - Retail
Shopping Center
up to 9,999 sq ft sq fUGLA $343 $3.24 $2.58 $1 94
10,000 sq ft-49,999 sq ft sq fUGLA $3.01 $2,84 $2.26 $1 70
50,000 sq ft-99,999 sq ft sq fUGLA $2,20 $2.08 $165 $1.25
100,000 sq ft-199,999 sq ft sq fUGLA $2.15 $2.03 $1 62 $1.22
200,000 sq ft-299,999 sq ft sq fUGLA $1 96 $185 $147 $1 11
300,000 sq ft-399,999 sq ft sq fUGLA $2.32 $2,19 $175 $1 31
over 400,000 sq ft sq fUGLA $261 $2.47 $1 97 $148
Miscellaneous Retail Sales sq fUGFA $1 19 $1 12 $089 $067
Supermarket sq fUGFA $698 $659 $5.25 $395
Convenience Market sq fUGFA $12.10 $11 43 $910 $686
Nursery/Garden Center sq fUGFA $174 $1 64 $1 31 $099
Furniture Store sq fUGFA $018 $017 $013 $010
Car Sales - New/Used sq fUGFA $3.97 $375 $2.98 $2.25
Auto Care Center sq fUGLA $1 55 $146 $1 17 $088
Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop Service Bay $1,35894 $1,28335 $1,022.26 $769 82
Auto Parts Sales sq fUGFA $2.74 $2.59 $2.06 $1 55
Pharmacy(with Drive Through) sq fUGFA $340 $3.21 $256 $1 93
Free Standing Discount Store sq ftJGFA $240 $2.27 $1 81 $1 36
Hardware/Paint Store sq fUGFA $2.03 $1 91 $1 52 $1 15
Discount Club sq fUGFA $4.10 $387 $308 $2.32
Video Rental sq fUGFA $306 $2,89 $2.30 $174
Home Improvement Superstore sq fUGFA $1 62 $1 53 $1.22 $092
Tire Store Service Bay $1,590.01 $1,501 57 $1 ,196 08 $900 72
Electronics Superstore sq fUGFA $255 $2.41 $1 92 $144
Commercial - Office
Administrative Office
up to 9,999 sq ft sq fUGFA $6.65 $6.28 $500 $376
10,000 sq ft-49,999 sq ft sq fUGFA $665 $6,28 $500 $376
50,000 sq ft-99,999 sq ft sq fUGFA $3.85 $364 $290 $2.18
100,000 sq ft-199,999 sq ft sq fUGFA $2.92 $275 $2.19 $1 65
200,000 sq ft-299,999 sq ft sq fUGFA $2.55 $2.40 $1 91 $144
over 300,000 sq ft sq fUGFA $2.39 $2.25 $1 79 $1 35
Medical Office/Clinic sq fUGFA $566 $534 $4.25 $3.20
GLA= Gross Leasible Area
GFA= Gross Floor Area
VFP= Vehicle Fueling Positions (Maximum number of vehicles that can be fueled simultaneously)
page 2 of 2
Transportation Committee
November 14,2005
Present:
Jim Haggerton, Chair; Joe Duffie, Pam Carter
JIm Morrow, Jack Pace, Rebecca Fox, Cyndy Kmghton, Derek Speck, LIsa
Verner, Lucy Lauterbach; Chuck Parrish, Steve DiJulio-Foster Pepper &
Shefelman, Dave Markly, Brent Carson- Buck & Gordon, Sue Carlson, Dave
Kautz, Mark Segale
1. Transportation Element Rebecca explained the process of how the Transportation Element
is updated as part of the Comprehensive Plan. Updates can only occur once a year. A TransIt
Plan and Comprehensive Transportation Plan wIll be included in thIS update. The Planning
CommIssion held a public hearing 011 the Element. The Transportation Element will guide the
CIty'S transportatIOn needs in the next few years, and WIll provide a framework for implementing
ordinances on concurrency and Impact fees. Recommend Transportation Comprehensive
Plan Element to CO\V.
2. Concurrencv Ordinance The State Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that an
adopted Level of Service standard be maintamed as growth occurs. This is done through a
Concurrency Ordinance. Concurrency will be required in transportatIOn, water, sewer, and
surface water. Not only capacity is required to keep up with growth, but in water, water qualIty
must also be considered,
The mayor told representatives of Tukwila South (TS) and the Westfield Shoppingtown(the
Mall) that the City would address their traffic mItigatIon though th~ir Developer Agreements and
the proposed Impact Fee ordinance would not be applIed to theIr developments. Both developers
had suggested language that could be added to the Concurrency and Impact Fee ordinances. Jim
Morrow had reservations about naming developments m ordinances that implement the
Transportation Element ofthe Comp Plan. Three options were suggested: insertmg language to
exempt TS, the Mall, and the Penney's redevelopment; delaying adoption ofthe two
implementing ordinances; or having a transitIOn time for the new ordmance to be put into full
effect. The Concurrency and the Impact Fee ordinances would go into effect at year's end unless
a change is made. Jim H expressed concern about the number of "must" and "shall" provisions
throughout the Concurrency ordmance. Pam asked that a provision under the Concurrency Test
procedures be clarified. The Committee members asked that the City Attorney give a clear
explanation of how this and the Impact Fee ordinance related to the developer agreements that
are in process now, and options for addressing that issue. Recommend ordinance and options
to CO\V.
*
3. Impact Fee Ordinance Impact fees were discussed in the Jomt meetings of the Planning
Commission and Council. Cyndy said they had decided finally on havmg four areas for Impact
fee levels. Zone 1 is the Urban Center; Zones 2 & 3 are residential (though they include TIB and
Interurban businesses), and Zone 4 includes Ryan Hill and the industrial area in the north part of
the CIty. Ryan Hill was included m Zone 4 because their main access 1S through the mdustna1
area. Because 1110st of the projects 111 the six coming years are known about, Cyndy is able to
TransportatlOn CommIttee
November 14, 2005
Page 2
calculate this mto p.m. peak tnp costs for each of the four zones. The City will study the
Improvements needed in each area each year, and from that a chart \vlll estimate impact fees for
each area. Cyndy had revised the charts smce they were put mto the agenda, and those charts
include some but not all the land uses in a reference book she has. One prOVISIOn in the
ordinance says if anyone development is exempted, the Cl ty must pay what that exempted
company does not pay. The Committee members went through the ordmance and suggested
some clarifications. Pam C asked for a clanfication about using either 6 or 10 years to payoff
project costs. Recommend ordinance to CO\V.
i
4. Developer Agreement Ordinance This ordinance would fonnalize developer agreements in
the City, and would provide guidance about what should be included m them. One section
provided flexibility in requinng adherence to regulations. Steve DIJulio said state law dictates
that any developer agreement that comes after adoptlOn of a code must follow that code. The
Committee did not have comments on the body of the ordinance. Recommend ordinance to
CO\V.
5. South center Parkway Extension The City contracted with David Evans to design
Southcenter Parkway from S. 180th _200th. Comments from Tukwlla South (TS) project were
included at the beginnmg of the contract. That work is now 90% complete, and TS has reviewed
the plans and proposed twelve new addItions such as traffic signals, bus pullouts, new
intersections, a change in the size and level of the roadway, and utIlity work. This would require
additional work from David Evans. NIark Segale reported they are negotiating with the
Schoenbachlers, and expect a final answer from them soon. Jim Morrow said he would come
back to the Committee for additional funding authorization after the Schoenbachlers and Segales
work out right-of-way issues. Information.
6. Proiect Funding Jim M has heard about the federal fundmg for Khckltat and Southcenter
Parkway. The funding for both has been cut 15% for Katrina aid, and the CIty will only be able
to receive 20% reimbursement per year for the promised grant. Therefore, the City will need to
fund the projects up front, and later get paid the grant in annual payments. Information.
9-~ Committee chair approval
tI Minutes by LL
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
h
k J 44A Luttals ITEM NO.
e I41 a tbieeting Date 1 Prepared by 1 Ma} or's review Council review
■SS r t 12/05/05 KAF
is, LP 1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER. 05-160 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE. DECEMBER 5, 2005
AGENDA ITEM TITLE 2005 Proposed Budget Amendments
CATEGORY Discusszon Motzon Resolutzon Ordinance Bzd Award Public Hearzng Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Altg Date 12/05/05 Mtg Date Mtg Date Altg Date Altg Date
SPONSOR Council Maj'or Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PW
SPONSOR'S Attached for review are the proposed amendment to the 2005 Budget.
SUMMARY
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE. December 5, 2005
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN Approve amendment as submitted
COMMITTEE Same
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$370,000 $0 $0
Fund Source
Comments
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS
12/5/05 Cover Memo from Finance Director
Detail of Final Adjustments for the 2005 Budget
Draft Ordinance Amending the 2005 Budget
To:
Mayor and City Council
From:
Kevin A. Fuhrer, Finance Director
,fL
Date:
December I, 2005
Subject:
2005 Budget Amendment
As we near the end of our fiscal year, we customarily assess our actual
financial performance with the adopted budget. On the heels of that
analysis, an amendment to the 2005 Budget is proposed as detailed in the
following attachment. The amendment will be reviewed with the Finance
and Safety Committee preceding the Council meeting,
I look forward to reviewing this information with you on Monday,
December 5.
General Fund 000
2005 Budget Amendment
Revenues:
Sales Tax
Franchise Fees
Total Revenues
313 100 00
321 91000
$ 320,000
$ 50,000
$ 370,000
Expenditures:
Transfer Out to Fund 411
Total Expenditures
597 760 00
$ 370,000
$ 370,000
if/} fD)l; Lm R lr
b" lIO fU If u
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE 2005 BUDGET ADOPTED BY
ORDINANCE NO. 2079, PROVIDING FOR UNANTICIPATED REVENUE
TRANSFERS AND EXPENDITURES IN THE GENERAL FUND; PROVIDING
FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, the General Fund received revenues in excess of anticipated amounts
during 2005, and
WHEREAS, the Foster Golf Course Fund will require a transfer from the General Fund
due to a fund balance shortfall;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The following program categories in the 2005 budget, as adopted by
Ordinance No. 2079, are hereby amended to read as follows:
GENERAL FUND -- 000
Revenues: Sales Tax ................................................... .31310000,.. $320,000
Franchise Fees..............................................321 91000... $ 50,000
Total Revenues...................... .........................,.................. $370,000
Expenditures: Transfer Out to Fund 411...........................597 76000... $370,000
Total Expenditures .............. .................,..,........................ $370,000
.
Section 2, Ordinance No. 2079 is hereby amended by revising the summary of totals of
estimated revenues and appropriations and the aggregate total to reflect the foregoing
increases in revenues and appropriations as set forth in Section 1 of this ordinance.
Section 3. The Finance Director is hereby authorized and instructed to effectuate the
necessary changes in the 2005 budget, and to make all necessary and appropriate line item
entries and adjustments in order to reflect the increases to revenues and appropriations as set
forth in this ordinance.
Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be
invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 5. Effective Date, This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in
the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force and effect five (5)
days after passage and publication as provided by law
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a
Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2005
AITESTj AUTHENTICATED:
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council.
Published.
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number
Office of the City Attorney
C\Documents and Settings\All Users\Desktop\Kelly\MSDATA \Ordinances\Budget Amendment 2005.doc
KEksn 12/2/2005
Page 1 of 1
Tentative Agenda Schedule
MONTH MEETING1- MEETING 2,;;'" MEETING 3 ... MEETING 4-
REGULAR ,CO.W. i-{ REGULAR C.O.W.
December 5 12 19 27 (Tuesday)
26'''_ Special Issues:
Christmas Day- See agenda packet - Way Back Inn lease
observed cover sheet for this for Foster House at
(City offices closed) week's agenda 14239 - 42nd Ave S.
(December 5, 2005 - Authorize Mayor to
Regular Meeting) accept a donation of
land (1.34 acres
valued at $100,000)
\ from the Cascade
Land Conservancy
for open space
(greenbelt)
Special Meeting
(to immediately follow
co W meeting)
- Oath of Office
administered to
recently elected
councilmembers
- An ordinance
amending the
2005 Budget
- An ordinance
adopting the
2006 Budget
- Way Back Inn lease
for Foster House at
14239-42nd AveS.
- Authorize Mayor to
accept a donation of
land from the
Cascade Land
Conservancy for
open space
January 3 (Tuesday) 9 17 (Tuesday) 23
2"d - New Years Public Hearin!J:
Day--observed Developer's
(City offices closed) agreement (Tukwila
uJh - South project)
M.L. King Jr Day This Committee of the
(City offices closed) Whole meeting to be
3d" - Fifth immediately followed
by a Special Meeting
Monday of the
month-no
Coullcilmeeting
scheduled
February 6 13 21 (Tuesday) 27
2if' -
Presidents Day
(City offices closed)
Upcoming Meetings & Events
DECEMBER 2005
5th (Monday) 6th (Tuesdav) 7th (Wednesday) . 8th (Thursday) 9th (Fridav) 10th (Saturday)
:.> Finance & Safety ,. Chamber of ? Planning ~ Human
Cmte, Commerce Clay Jenkinson Commission, Services
5:00 P1\1 Gov't.& performance 7'00 PM Advisory
(CR #3) Community Clay Jenkinson as (Col/ncil Chambers) Board,
Affairs Cmte., Thomas Jefferson and 10:00 AM
~ City Council 12:00 NOON Bill Chrystal as Jolm Clay Jenkinson (Hl/man
Regular Mtg., (Chamber Adams in a debate performance Services
7:00 PM Office) Office)
(Council 7:00 PM Clay Jenkinson as
Chambers) )> Utilities Cmte Tl/kwila Performing Theodore Roosevelt
CANCELLED Arts Center (at Foster 7:00 PM
High School)
)> Arts Call 206-674-4673 for Redmond Performing
Commission more information. Arts Center (at
Redmond High School)
RESCHEDULED Sponsored by TuJ.;wila Call 206.674-4673 for
TO DEC. 13TH RotOlY Club, King County
Journal, and Executive more information.
\ Support Center, Inc. Sponsored by Tukwila
Rotary CII/b. King COWlty
Journal, alld Executive
Support Center, IlIc.
12th (Monday) 13th (Tuesdav) 14th (Wednesday) 15th (Thursday) 16th {Fridav} 17th (Saturdav)
:.- Transportation )> Community )> Domestic Violence
Cmte, Affairs & Parks Task Force Mtg., Chipper Day
5:00 PM Cmte, 12:00 Noon (CR #5) 10:00 AM to
(CR iI/) 5:00 PM 1:00 PM
(CR #3) :ft11.J6!iC:lD 1~~OD ~,
\.':"J
jo- Civil Service 700"
Commission, )> Arts Commission, ChrlmmJs .,pmy
5:00 PM 5:00 PM
(CR il3) Specialmeeti1/g 7:00 to 8:30 PM
date alld locatioll Tl/kwila Community
)> City Council this mOll1h; call Center
Committee of 767-2342 for ~
the Whole Mtg., more illformatioll
7:00 PM
(Council )> Highway 99 Tukwila's Parks &
Chambers) Action Cmte, Recreation Dept.: and the
(COW Mtg. to 7:00 PM Tukwila American Legion
be immediately (I'ukwila Post #235's annual party
followed by a Community for children, with
Special Meeting) Center) entertainment, songs, and
a visit from Santa.
PIense bring a call of
food to donate to the
Tul,;wila Food Pantry,
)> Apartment Managers' Networking Lunch: Periodically as scheduled. Contact Robbie Burns at 206-243-6506.
>- Arts Commission: 1st Tues., 5:00 PM, Tukwila Community Center Contact Kimberly Matej at 206-767-2342.
? Chamber of Commerce's Tukwila Government and Community Affairs Committee: 1st Tues., 12:00 Noon, Chamber Offices.
Contact Nancy Damon at 206-575-/633.
j> Chipper Days, sponsored by the Wash. State Dept. of Agriculture: 3rd Sat., 10:00 AM to 1:00 PM, Foster HS main parking lot.
Dispose of prunings and plant materials from the longhomed beetle quarantine area. Drive your truckload of materials to the parking
lot and help will be provided to unload, chip and dispose of materials free of charge. Be sure to bring 1D with quarantine area address.
j> City Council Committee of Whole (C.O.W.) Meeting: 2nd & 4th Mon., 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall.
:.. City Council Regular Meeting: 1st & 3rd Mon., 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall.
:.- Civil Service Commission: 2nd Mon., 5:00 Pl\I, Conf. Room #3 Contact Bev Willison at 206-433-/844
)> Community Affairs & Parks Committee: 2nd & 4th Tues., 5'00 PM, Conf. Room #3.
>- COPCAB (Community Oriented Policing Citizens Adv. Board): 4th Wed., 6:30 PM, Conf. Rm #5 Marja Murray (206-433-7/75).
)> Crime Hot Spots Task Force: 3rd Wed., 10:00 AM, Conf. Room #5 Contact Marja Murray at 206-433-7/75.
}> Domestic Violence Task Force: 3rd Thurs., 12:00 Noon, Conf. Room #5 Contact Evie Boykan or Stacy Hansen at 206-433-7/80.
)> Equity & Diversity Commission: 1st Thurs., 5 15 PM, Showalter Middle School Library COlltact L!lcy Lauterbach at 206-433-1834
:r Finance & Safety Committee: 1st & 3rd Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room #3. Agenda items for 12/5/05 meeting: (A) Ordinance
amending the 2005 Budget. (B) Ordinance adopting the 2006 Proposed Budget. (C) Resolution approving the 2006-20// Proposed
Financial Planning Model and Capilal/mprovemell/ Program.
:.. Highway 99 Action Committee: 2nd Tues., 7'00 PM, Tukwila Community Center Call/act Chief Dave Haynes at 206-433-/812.
:.. Human Services Advisory Brd: 2nd Fri. of even months, 10:00 AM, Human Services Office. Contact Evie Boykan at 206-433-7/80.
>- Human Services Providers: 11.30 AM, TCC, (tentative schedule: 3/18, 6/17, 9/16, 1212). Contact Stacy Hansen at 206-433-7/8/
)> Library Advisory Board: 3rd Wed., 7:00 PM, Foster Library Contact Bruce Fletcher at 206-767-2343
? Lodging Tax Advisory Committee: Every other month (or as scheduled), 12 NOON. Contact Katherine Kertzman at 206-575-2489
:.. Parks Commission: 3rd Wed., 5.30 PM, Senior Game Room at Community Center Contact Kimberly Matej at 206-767-2342.
>- Planning CommissionlBoard of Architectural Review: 4th Thurs., except 2nd Thursday in Nov & Dec., 7'00 PM,
Council Chambers at City Hall. Contact Wynetta Bivens at 206-43/-3670.
>- Transportation Committee: 2nd & 4th Mon., 5'00 PM, Conf. Room #1
:.. Utilities Committee: 1st & 3rd Tues., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room #1 /2/6/05 meeting has been cancelled.
~ Court = Busy Court and/or Jury Calendar (noted to alert employees and citizens of potential parking difficulty).