The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOW 2005-11-14 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET w 9 Tukwila City Council Agenda O o COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Council;nembers Joe Duffle Joan Hernandez t /908 Rhonda Berry, City Administrator Pam Carter Jim Haggerton Pamela Linder, Council President Dennis Robertson Dave Fenton Monday, November 14, 2005 Tukwila City Hall 7 :00 PM Council Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER/ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. SPECIAL a. Tukwila Youth Council: Marius Larsen, Recreation Coordinator, PRESENTATIONS Parks Recreation Department b. Proclamation regarding Soka Gakkai International (David Hams) 3: CITIZEN At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included COMMENT on this agenda. To comment on an item included on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is presented for discussion. 4. SPECIAL a. An ordinance to remove the City Council from certain quasi judicial ISSUES decision- making processes (administrative appeals process) b Amendment #2 to AG 04 -063, Commercial Development Solutions (Lisa Verner) contract. c. Amendment #1 to AG 00 -080, Watershed Basins withm Water Resources Inventory Area 9 (WRIA 9) interlocal agreement. d. A resolution ratifying the Green /Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed (WRIA 9) Salmon Habitat Plan. e. Storm and surface water rates and charges: (1) An ordinance relating to storm and surface water rates and charges (2) A resolution adopting a Public Works Fee Schedule. f. Continued review of the Proposed 2006 Budget and CIP Please bring your copy of the Proposed 2006 Budget/CIP. Q 5. REPORTS a. Mayor b. City Council c. Staff d. City Attorney e. Intergovernmental 6. MISCELLANEOUS 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION 8. ADJOURNMENT Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible. Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice to the City Clerk's Office: 206 433- 1800/TDD 206 248 -2933. This notice is available at www.ci.tukwila.wa.us and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities. Tukwila Council meetings are audio taped. J J 1LA �1, �•n0 tA4i •v� o M G Office o the Mayor w ��.s, Tukwila, Washington Yi s f is 1908 v� t Tl* N P ROCLA. WHEREAS, Soka Gakkai International (SGI) is a culturally diverse Buddhist association whose community -based activities foster world citizens and an awareness of humanity's relationship to the environment; and WHEREAS, under the leadership of Dr. Daisaku Ikeda, SGI promotes individual develop- ment and societal harmony, focusing particularly on the growth of young people who will become global citizens, treasuring and respecting the dignity of each person's life, and contributing to the prosperity of their communities; and WHEREAS, Dr. Ikeda and his wife, Mrs. Kaneko Ikeda, have devoted over 50 years to human well -being on a global scale, transcending national and state boundaries in their tireless efforts for peace dialogues; and WHEREAS, Dr. Ikeda has founded several educational, peace and cultural institutions, including Soka University of America (California), Toda Institute for Global Peace and Policy Research (Hawaii), and the Boston Research Center for the 21st Century; and WHEREAS, SGI has been engaged in worldwide activity for peace, cultural understanding and education for 75 years and in particular in the United States for 45 years; and WHEREAS, SGI has been a good neighbor and friend to the Tukwila community; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Steven M. Mullet, Mayor of the City of Tukwila, do hereby proclaim Friday, November 18, 2005, in the city of Tukwila: SGI DAY Signed this 14th day of November, 2005. l Steven M Mullet, Mayor of Tukwila COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS 7 ITEItINo. O �1 �1 )Yleetzng Date Prepared by 1 Mayor's review I Council revzem cti �h► :l. 11/14/05 PO 908 I ITEM INFORMATION. CAS NUMBER: 05-143 ORIGINAL' AGENDA DATE. NOVEMBER 14, 2005 AGENDA ITENI TITLE Administrative Appeals Process CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other Aft Date 11 -14-05 Mtg Date illtg Date ltg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Alltg Date SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD ['Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PIV SPONSOR'S Under this proposed ordinance, ac ;inistrative decisions would be appealed to the City's SUMMARY hearing examiner. Depending on the type of appeal, the examiner will hold a hearing and create the record and make a decision. If it is a closed record hearing, the examiner will review the record and make a decision based on the law as applied to the record developed below. Appeals from the Examiner will go directly to Superior Court. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utihties Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE. RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN City Attorney's Office COMMIYrEE CA &P recommended to send to COW for discussion. COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED -0- -0- -0- Fund Source: Comments MTG. DATE 1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 1 1 MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS I 11 -14 -05 Memorandum to CA &P Cmte. dated 10 -06 -05 Proposed Ordinance 1 CAP Minutes October 11, 2005 1 1 1 CITY OF TUK"VILA lVIElVI 0 RAl~D UIYr TO: Community Affairs and Parks Committee . / / _ ~' /1 //;/ Shelley /r~~.4CttYAtiorney ~ . October 6, 2005 FROM: DATE: RE: Administrative Appeals Issue Whether the City sh4)uld streamline the process for appeals of various administrative matters and send more land use matters to the hearing examiner for adjudIcation, Background As you know, the City has recently had several quasi- judIcial proceedmgs that have come before the council. Following the most recent appeal hearing, It was suggested by several council members that we explore the process that we use to adjudicate land use matters. Discussion Attached please find a draft ordinance, which removes the City Council from the quasi-judicial land use appeal process in all but a few CIrcumstances. Under this proposed ordinance, administrative decisions would be appealed to the City's heanng exammer, Depending on the type of appeal, the examiner will hold a hearing and create the record and make a decision, If it is a closed record hearing, the examiner will review the record and make a decision based on the law as applied to the record developed below, Appeals from the examiner will go directly to Superior Court. Most cities have long ago moved to this system ofland use appeals, They have done this for several reasons: (1) the complexity of the issues related to land use continue to increase; (2) the stakes for making errors is higher, with attorney's fees provisions in the Land Use PetitIOn Act as well as damage claims that can arise from making deCiSIons based on impennissible cnteria; and (3) it removes the council from politically awkward or difficult situations, The restrictIOns placed on council members in a quasi-judicial setting cut off contact and communication wIth cItizens This ordinance increases the opportunity for council members to interact with their constItuents on vital land use issues. G:'.City Anomey\Tu.....wila'CAS REPORTS\[nfom",lion ~[emo Re Adminislrative Appeals.dociP/IO/06i05 Options After discussion of this issue last spring with the Finance and Safety Committee, it was recommended that we explore moving the majority ofland use hearings to the examiner. However, the Council certainly has the option of detennining whIch matters it would like to retainjurisdlCtion over and the draft ordinance can ~e modIfied accordmgly. Recommendation Adoption of the ordinance. -2- G:\City Attomey\Tukwila\CAS REPORTS\fnfomJ3tion :-'!emo Re Administrative Appeals.docIP/IOf06/05 DRAFT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING TMC 18.;1.04,010 TO REMOVE THE CITY COUNCIL FROM CERTAIN QUASI-JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES; REPEALING ORDINANCE NOS, 1768 ~2 (PART), 1796 ~3 (PART), 1841 ~2, 1857 ~7, 2005 ~20, 2066 ~2, 2097 ~22, AND 2098 ~4; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to remove itself from certain quasi-judicial processes; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. TMC 18,104.010, Amended. Tukwila Municipal Code Section 18.104,010, Classification of Project Permit Applications, is hereby amended, to read as follows: 18.104.010 Classification of Project Permit Applications A, Project permit decisions are classified into five types, based on the degree of discretion associated with each decision, as set forth in this section, Procedures for the five different types are distinguished according to who makes the decision, whether public notice is required, whether a public meeting and/or a public hearing is required before a decision is made, and whether administrative appeals are provided. B, Type 1 decisions are made by City administrators who have technical expertise as designated by ordinance, Type 1 decisions may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner who will hold a closed record appeal hearing based on the information presented to the City administrator who made the decision. Public notice is not required for Type 1 decisions or for the appeals of those decisions. TYPE 1 DECISIONS TYPE OF PERMIT DECISION MAKER Development Permit Building Official Sign Permit, except for those sign permits Community Development specifically requiring approval of the Planning Director Commission or denials of sign permits which are appealable Boundary Line Adjustment, including Community Development Lot Consolidation Director Minor Modification to PRD Community Development (TMC 18.46.130) Director Minor modification to BAR approved design Community Development (TMC 18,60,030) Director Any land use permit or approval issued by the As specified by ordinance City, unless specifically categorized as a Type 2, 3,4, or 5 decision by this Chapter C.\Documents and Seltings\All Users\Desktop\Kelly\MSDATA \Ordinances\Quasi-Judicial Decision-Making.doc <:K_PR.hn 11/1()/?M, p~(TP 1 nf4 C. Type 2 decisions are decisions which are initially made by the Director or, in certain cases, other City administrators or committees, but which are subject to an open record appeal to the Hearing Examiner, Planning Commission, or, in the case of shoreline permits, an appeal to the State Shorelines Hearings Board pursuant to RCW 90.58. TYPE 2 DECISIONS INITIAL APPEAL BODY TYPE OF PERMIT DECISION MAKER (open record appeal) Administrative Design Review Community Development Board of (TMC 18.60,030) Director ' Architectural Review Administrative Planned Short Plat Committee Hearing Residential Development Examiner (TMC 17.08,040) Short Plat Short Plat Committee Hearing (TMC 17,08.060) Examiner Binding Site Improvement Plan Short Plat Committee Hearing (TMC Chap,17,16) Examiner Shoreline Substantial Community Development State Shorelines Development Permit Director Hearings Board (TMC Chapter 18.44) Decision regarding Sensitive Community Development Planning Areas (except Reasonable Use Director Commission Exception) (TMC 18,45 125) Special Permission Parking, Community Development Hearing and Modifications to Certain Director Examiner Parking Standards (TMC 18.56,060 and ,070) Parking standard for use not Community Development Hearing specified Director Examiner (TMC 18.56,100) Code Interpretation Community Development Hearing (TMC 18,90.010) Director Examiner Special Permission Sign, except Community Development Planning "unique sign" (various sections Director Commission of TMC Title 19) Sign Permit Denial Community Development Planning (TMC Chapter 19.12) Director Commission Sign Area Increase Community Development Planning (TMC 19.32,140) Director Commission Placement of Cargo Container Community Develpment Hearing (TMC 18.50,060) Director Examiner Exception from Single-Family Community Development Planning Design Standard Director Commission D Type 3 decisions are quasi-judicial decisions made by the Hearing Examiner following an open record hearing, Type 3 decisions may be appealed only to Superior Court, except for shoreline variances that may be appealed to the State Shorelines Hearings Board pursuant to RCW 90.58, C\Documents and Se!tings\AIl Users\Desktop\Kelly\!v1SDATA \Ordinances\Quasi-Judicial Decision-Making.doc SK-PB:ksn 11/1012005 Pa2:e 2 of 4 TYPE 3 DECISIONS TYPE OF PERMIT DECISION MAKER Variance (zoning, shoreline, sidewalk, Hearing Examiner land alteration, sign) Resolve uncertain zone district boundary Hearing Examiner E, Type 4 decisions are quasi-judicial decisions made by the Board of Architectural Review or the Planning Commission, following an opeI1 record hearing, Type 4 decisions may be appealed to the Hearing Exan:uner, based on the record established by the Board of Architectural Review or Planning Commission, except Shoreline Conditional Use Permits, which are appealable to the State Shorelines Hearings Board pursuant to RCW 90,58, TYPE 4 DECISIONS INITIAL TYPE OF PERMIT DECISION APPEAL BODY MAKER (closed record appeal) Shoreline Conditional Use Permit Planning State Shorelines (TMC 18.44.050) Commission Hearings Board Reasonable Use Exceptions under Planning Hearing Examiner Sensitive Areas Ordinance Commission (TMC 18.45 115) Public Hearing Design Review Board of Hearing Examiner (TMC Chapter 18,60, 18.56.040 Architectural and Shoreline Master Program) Review Modifications to Certain Parking Planning Hearing Examiner Standards Commission (TMC Chapter 18,56) Conditional Use Permit Planning Hearing Examiner (TMC Chapter 18,64) Commission Unique Signs Planning Hearing Examiner (TMC 19,28,010) Commission Variance from Parking Standards Planning City Council Over 10% (TMC 18,56,140) Commission F, Type 5 decisions are quasi-judicial decisions made by the Hearing Examiner or City Council following an open record hearing. Type 5 decisions may be appealed only to Superior Court. TYPE 5 DECISIONS TYPE OF PERMIT DECISION MAKER Subdivision - Preliminary Plat Hearing Examiner (TMC 17,12,020) Subdivision - Final Plat City Council (TMC 17.12.030) Planned Residential Development Hearing Examiner (PRD), including Major Modifications (TMC Chapter 18,46) Unclassified Use Hearing Examiner (TMC Chapter 18,66) Sensitive Area Master Plan Overlay City COlmcil (TMC 18.45,160) C:\Documenls and Settings\All Users\Desktop\Kelly\M5DATA \Ordinances\Quasi'Judicial Decision-Making.doc SK.PB:ksn 11/10/2005 Page 3 of 4 TYPE 5 DECISIONS (continued) TYPE OF PERMIT DECISION MAKER Rezone City Council (TMC Chapter 18.84) Shoreline Environment Redesignation Hearing Examiner (Shoreline Master Program) Section 2, Repealer. Ordinance Nos. 1768 ~2 (part), 1796 ~3 (part), 1841 ~2, 1857 ~7, 2005920, 2066 ~2, 2097 ~22, and 2098 ~4 are hereby repealed., Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 4, Effective Date, This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2005 ATIEST / AUTHENTICATED' Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City CIerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council. Published. Effective Date: Ordinance Number: Office of the City Attorney C\Docurnel1ts al1d Senings\AU Users\Desktop\Kelly\MSDATA \Ordinal1ces\Quasi-Judicial Decision-Making.doc SK-PB:ksn 11/10/2005 Page 4 of 4 Community and Parks Committee October II, 2005 Present: Joe Duffie; Chair; Joan Hernandez, Pam Linder Steve Lancaster, Jack Pace, Ryan Larson, Peter Beckwith, Derek Speck, EVle Boykan, Stacy Hanson, Kevin Fuhrer, Gall Labanara, Lucy Lauterbach; Gordon Thompson , 1. WRIA-9 Salmon Habitat Program Gordon showed a power point program about Kmg County's WRIA 9(\Vater Resource Inventory Area 9) program, It showed the salmon habitat plan overview of what kinds of programs are envisioned for improving habitat, and a ratification plan for adopting the WRIA Plan, a~ well as the local role in implementing the Plan, The area extends from Puget Sound below M~gnolia in the north past Vashon Island and Maury Island in the South, and down the DuwamishlGreen River. Tukwila is in a transition zone where small fish acclimate between fresh and salt water, so it plays an important role in fish survival. Information. -* 2. Administrative Appeals Process Based on discussions at Council some months ago, a draft ordinance had been drafted which removed the City Council from most quasi-judicial decisions, Most administrative appeals that have gone to Council would instead go to a hearing examiner. The ~ast quasi-judicial decision by Council concerned a new development of\Vinners, and an appeal from JoAnn Fabrics about the new building obscuring the view of JoAnn's. Committee members were generally supportive of the changes, but had some hesitation about giving up all the decisions. They agreed to send the ordinance to the COW and then to the Planning CommIssion. Recommend ordinance to CO\-V. -- 3. Resolution Ratifving WillA 9 Habitat Plan The Plan has been put together with the help of IS WRIAjurisdictions, and would lead to protecting habitat for salmon, Though it does not require jurisdictions to do projects, it is a guideline for shoreline development. The Committee requested that this item be brought back for consideration when Council Member Robertson returns. Reschedule. 4. Amendment to \-VRIA-9 \-Vatershed Planning A proposal has been made to extend the current \VRIA-9 Interlocal Agreement for one year. This will allow development of an implementation plan for the recently completed Habitat Plan. This extension will require member cities to again pay a \VRIA fee, though it will be lower than previous years. Tukwlla's portion will be $13,359, and it is in the budget. Recommend interlocal to COW. 5. Zoning Code Updates New language has been added to the zoning code regarding application for rezones. It gives better criteria for making decisions about rezones, and gives the DCD director more weight in making decisions on interpretations, The design review approval standards were also changed. Recommend changes to Planning Commission, then to CO\-V. 6. Relocation Assistance of Tenants In July, 2005 a provision in State law became available to require landlords to relocate tenants who have been displaced due to substandard housing conditions, No relocation is required if the tenant caused the condition by their illegal conduct, if Go UNCIL A G NDA SEVOPSIS t i Up N. y 5 Luttalr ITEAf NO. o -41 �l i Meeting Date 1 Prepared by 1 Mayor's r 1 Council review 1 7 4 1 11/14/05 1 sjlA 1 h�.�.- I I 1 1 k ib. ITEM INFORMATION I CAS NUMBER. I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE. November 14, 2005 AGENDA ITEM TITLE Amendment #2 to Contract with Commercial Development Services CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance 11113u I Award Public Hearing Other 11/14/05 Mtg Date Mtg Date A'Itg Date iltg Date Altg Date Altg Date Alltg Date SPONSOR Council Mayor Adin Svcs DCD ['Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PIV SPONSOR'S Commercial Development Solutions (Lisa Verner) provides project management services SUMMARY for the Tukwila South development proposal. The original term of the contract was one year, "not to exceed" $94,000. This contract was amended in July, 2005 to extend through November, 2005 with an additional allocation of $40,000. We are proposing to extend the current contract through April 30, 2006, for an addional amount not-to exceed $60,000. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utihties Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DA'1E. 10 -25 -05 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Approve contract amendment COMMrrTEE Approve contract amendment COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $60,000 Fund Source: 2005 ENDING FUND ($20,000); 2006 BUDGET ($40,000 PROPOSED) Comments MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 11 -14 -05 1 1 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 11 -14 -05 Draft Amendment #2 to Contract for Services AG04 -063 1 1 Contract for Annexation and Development Services AG04 -063, July 13, 2004 Amendment #1 to Contract for Services AG04 -063, July 22, 2005 CAP Minutes, October 25, 2005 meeting \IcMemo from Steve Lancaster dated November 1, 2005 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM: Committee of the Whole yHlAI Steve Lancaster ~. TO: DATE: November 1,2005 SUBJECT: Amendment to Commercial Development Solutions contract ISSUE Should our contract with Commercial Development Solutions for project management services related to the Tukwila South Project be extended? BACKGROUND Commercial Development Solutions (Lisa Verner) has been providing project management services for the Tukwila South development proposal since July of 2004. The original term of the contract was one year, with an amount "not to exceed" $94,000, This contract was amended in July, 2005 to extend through November, 2005 with an additional allocation of $40,000. We anticipate needing Lisa's services for several more months, and are proposing a contract amendment. The proposed amendment would extend the current contract through April 30, 2006. The proposed additional compensation for this extension would be "not to exceed" $60,000, bringing the total for the contract up to $194,000, The proposed contract amendment would commit more money than was budgeted for 2005 (DCD line item 000.08.558.100.41.00). A budget amendment would be required to cover the remainder of2005. The proposed 2006 budget includes $40,000 (DCD Administration Professional Services line item), This amount would cover the January through April period of the amended contract. Q'\PAA\TVS Segale\CDS_Extension2COW,doc-sjl-Created on 1l/0l/2005 9 34 AM Page I of2 ALTERNATIVES I. Extend the contract with Commercial Development Services through Apnl 2005, in an additional amount not to exceed $60,000, 2. Extend the contract for a shorter or longer period of time, and adjust the amount accordingly. 3, Allow the current contract to expire. COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PARKS COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION Forward to Committee of the Whole with a recommendation to extend the contract with Commercial Development Services through April, 2006, in an additional amount not to exceed $60,000. Q:\PAA\TVS Segale\CDS_Extension2COW.doc-sjl-Created on I 110112005 9,34 AM Page 2 of2 Contract No, City of Tukwila Contract for Services Amendment # 2 Contract No, AG04-063 dated July 13,2004, as amended by Amendment #1 dated July 22,2005, between the City of Tukwila and Commercial Development Solutions is further amended as follows: Section 2, Compensation and Method of Payment, is amended to add $60,000 to the amount of the contract. The total amount of funds to be paid shall not exceed $194,000. \ Section 4, Duration of Agreement, is amended to extend the contract to April 30, 2006. All other provisions of the Contract shall remain in full force and effect. day of ,2005. DATED this CONTRACTOR CITY OF TUKWILA Commercial Development Solutions Steven M. Mullet, Mayor FORM ATTEST / AUTHENTICATED Jane E, Cantu, CMC, City Clerk ~ty/ Q:\P AA \TVS Segale\CDS amend2 doc-sJI-Created on 10/1912005 2 30 PM Page I of 1 ~ -----~----------- ~--.~---~- ._----~ ,- Contract No 04- D& 3 CONTRACT FOR ANNEXATION At'ill DEVELOPMENT SERVICES This Agreement is entered into by and between the City of Tukwila, Washington, a noncharter optional municipal code city hereinafter referred to as "the City", and Commercial Development Solutions, hereinafter referred to as "the Contractor," whose mailing address is PO Box 70372 Seattle, Washington 98127. ' WHEREAS, the City has detennined the need to have certain services performed for its citizens but does not have the personnel or expertise to perfonn such services; and .WHEREAS, the City desires to have the Contractor perform such services pursuant to certain tenns and conditions; now, therefore, IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual benefits and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties heI;eto agree as follows: 1. Scope and Schedule of Services to be Performed bv Contractor, The Contractor shall perform those services described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth. In performing such services, the Contractor shall at all times comply with all Federal, State, and local statutes, rules and ordinances applicable to the performance of such services and the handling of any funds used in connection therewith, The Contractor shall request and obtain prior written approval from the City if the scope or schedule is to be modified in any way 2, Compensation and Method ofPavment. The City shall pay the Contractor for services rendered according to the rate and method set forth on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The total amount to be paid shall not exceed $94,000.00. Invoices listing work perfonned and hours worked shall be submitted by Contractor to the City at the end of each calendar month. The City shall pay invoices within 35 days of receipt. 3. Contractor Budget. The Contractor shall apply the funds received under this Agreement within the maximum limits set forth in this Agreement. The Contractor shall request prior approval from the City whenever the Contractor desires to amend its budget in any way 4, Duration of Agreement. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing July 13, 2004, and ending July 12, 2005 unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified, 5. Independent Contractor. Contractor and City agree that Contractor is an independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and employee between the parties hereto. Neither Contractor nor any employee of Contractor shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or contributing to the State Industrial Insurance Program, or otherwIse assuming the duties of an employer with respect to the Contractor, or any employee of the Contractor. 6. Indemnification. The Contractor shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims, losses or liability, including attorney's fees, arising from injury or death to persons or damage to property occasioned by any act, omission or failure negotiated by the parties. This paragraph shall not apply to any damage resulting from the sole negligence of the City, its agents and employees, To the extent any of the damages referenced by this paragraph were caused by or resulted from the concurrent neglIgence of the City, its agents or employees, this obligation to indemnify, defend and hold hannless is valid ':~:.~ ::;..:;:~: "-'.. " ~---------- - - B, These records shall be maintained for a period of seven (7) years after tennination hereof unless pennission to destroy them is granted by the office of the archIvist in accordance with RCW Chapter 40.14 and by the City - 8. Audits and Inspections. The records and documents with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement shall be subject at aB times to inspection, review or audit by law during the perfonnance of this Agreement. 9, Termination. This Agreement may at any time be tenninated by the City or Contractor giving to the other party thirty (30) days written notice of the City's or Contractor's intention to tenninate the same, In the event of such tennination, Contractor shaH be entitled to compensation for services rendered through the date oftennination, 10. Discrimination Prohibited. The Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee, applicant for employment, or any person seeking the services of the Contractor to be provided under this Agreement on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, sex, age, national origin, marital status or presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap, 11, Assignment and Subcontract. The Contractor shall not assign or subcontract any portion of the services contemplated by this Agreement without the written consent of the City 12, Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement between the parties hereto and no other Agreements, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement, shall be deemed to exist or bind any of the parties hereto, Either party may request changes in the agreement. Proposed changes which are mutually agreed upon shall be incorporated by written amendments to this Agreement. 13. Notices. Notices to the City ofTukwila shall be sent to the following address: City Clerk City of TukwiIa 6200 Southcenter Blvd. TukwiIa, Washington 98188 Notices to the Contractor shall be sent to the address provided by the Contractor upon the signature line below 14, Applicable Law; Venue; Attornev's Fees, This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. In the event any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is instituted to enforce any tenn of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be properly laid in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs of suit. DATED this /3t5-- day of ,20ft Ck.illcr U CONTRACTOR.C&rv/~ 7).0}eJp?)l71"~ <;;~ /'07-- BY ~0-: V(2/~ Tit!: flrc..~ c:71 c-t.. CITY OF TUKWILA sj.,-~ iV\ I"'~ @ Mayor, Steven M, Mullet ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED' 7 (jy t5- <) t/ er /l.V,r' Printed Name: ADDRESS. UJS f' /) 13:&{C 7 () 3 7L.- ~-(;JA-- '7?(27 l APPROVED AS TO FORiy!: Office of the City Attorney BY, ~/=- rJ-..~ . . '. CQ}- -'ACT NO. A Go Lf - rJ 0.5 0) < City of Tukwila Contract for Services Amendment # J Between the City of Tukwila and Commercial Development Solutions. That portion of Contract No. AG04-063' between the City of Tukwila and Commercial Develo-pment Solutions is amended as follows: Under Section 2., Compensation and Method of Payment, is amended to add $40,000 to the originkl amount of the contract. The total amount of funds to be paid shall not exceed $134,000. Under Section 4., Duration of Agreement is extended to November 30, 2005, All other provisions of the contract shall remain in full force and effect. ftd ~ n 1/ I", DATED this JZ,;? day o~, 2005. . ~ ~ CONTRACTOR rfitt(ri~~ ~E[Y... OFTUKWILA ~~\V)W\~ Steven M. Mullet, Mayor ATIEST / AUTHENTICATED ORM /J /~..// ~ 1 t<- ' >--- Community and Parks October 25, 2005 Page 2 of2 * 4. Amendment to Commercial Development Solutions Contract The TVS work is stretching out longer than anticipated, and Lisa Verner's work-is needed for some time into 2006, A contract extensIOn would run though Apnl 30, 2006 for up to $60,000. The Committee supported extending the contract. Recommend contract to CO\V. 5. Budget and CIP The Recreation budget review went quickly, but the Golf review raised questions, Past estimates of revenues for the course were overly optImistic, and the golf course will be about $600,000 short of revenues to pay back the bond In 2006, Pumps for the irrigation system are now badly worn out but there is not any money scheduled to be spent in 2006 on the golf course, Kurt said if the pump goes, it could have serious consequences in the golf clubhouse. It appears the golf course may need general fund support for several years, Budget Review. \ Minutes by LL ~ommittee chair approval G o UNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials ITEM No. r 0I 0 C+) IvIeetlri� Date Prepared by I Mayor's review Council review W's (I r 1 11/14/05 RL 7908 I 1 C ITEM INFORMATION I CAS NUMBER. 05-145 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE. NOVEMBER 14, 2005 AGENDA ITEM TITLE Interlocal Agreement with WRIA 9 One year Extension CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance ['Bid Award Public Hearing Other Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date illtg Date Illtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date: 11 14/05 SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire 111 Legal P&R Police ®PIV SPONSOR'S The City entered into an Interlocal Agreement with 15 other cities within the Water SUMMARY Resource Inventory Area 9 (WRIA 9) to fund a five -year habitat assessment plan through December 31, 2005. The plan is now complete and ready for adoption and the proposed one -year extension would allow for the development of a detailed implementation plan and begin to pursue funding sources. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utihties Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DA'Z'E. 10/11/05 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIIN Authorize Mayor to sign extension to the WRIA 9 Interlocal Agreement. COMMITTEE Forward to COW and then Regular with approval. COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $13,569.00 $18,000.00 Fund Source: 301 Parks Trails (page 22, 2005 CIP) Comments 1 MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 11/14/05 1 1 MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS 11/14/05 I Information Memo dated October 4, 2005 I 1 Supplement to the WRIA 9 Interlocal Agreement 00 -080 1 WRIA 9 Forum Approved 2006 Cost Shares Community Parks Committee Meeting Minutes from October 11, 2005 1 I I INFORMATION l\tIEl\tIO To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor Mullet Public W orks Direct~ October 4,2005 WRIA 9 Watershed Planning Interlocal A2feement One-Year Extension Project No. OO-DR04 ISSUE Approve a one-year extension to the WRIA 9 Watershed Planning Interlocal Agreement, BACKGROUND The City of Tukwila entered into an Interlocal Agreement with 15 other WRIA 9 jurisdictions to fund a five-year habitat assessment plan through December 31, 2005. This plan, GreenlDuwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Chinook Salmon Plan, is now complete and ready for adoption from the participating jurisdictions. This proposed one-year extension would allow for the development of a detailed implementation plan and begin to pursue funding sources. ANALYSIS The WRIA 9 Watershed Planning Interlocal Agreement was established to draft a habitat recovery plan to guide local jurisdictions in the recovery of Chinook salmon. With the completion of the plan, the participating jurisdictions are now faced with how best to implement the plan and how to fund the recommended actions. The City has budgeted $18,000 annually through 2010 for Watershed Planning. Tukwila's cost share for this one-year extension is $13,569, ACTION Approve a one-year extension of the WRIA 9 Watershed Planning Interlocal Agreement, RL:ad attachments' Extension Agreement WRIA 9 Forum 2006 Cost Shares (p:Proje.."tSlOOdrQ.IIWRIA 9 Info Memo) AG CO-080(c~) EXTENSION TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT For the Watershed Basins within Water Resources Inventory Area 9 This Extension to Interlocal Agreement for the Watershed Basins within Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 9 ("Agreement"), entered into by King County and the Cities of Algona, Auburn, Black Diamond, Burien, Covington, Des Moines, Enumclaw, Federal Way, Kent, Maple Valley, Normandy Park, Renton, SeaTac, Seattle, Tukwila, and Tacoma ("Original Parties") extends the original term of the Agreement through December 31, 2006, ("Extension") to allow all or some portion of the Original Parties additional time to pursue initiation of activities related to implementation of the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Chinook Salmon Plan ("Plan"). Through the Agreement, the Original 'Parties completed the drafting of the Plan in 2005 and are engaged in the process of Plan approval and ratification through their individual legislative bodies, The parties to this Extension ("Parties") wish to extend the Agreement through December 31 , 2006, in order to obtain such approval and ratification and to pursue initiation of activities related to implementation of the Plan. Section 3 of the Agreement allows the term of the Agreement to be extended through written agreement of the Parties. This Extension is effective upon execution by a sufficient number of the Original Parties meeting the condition for effectiveness for the original Agreement, Le., pursuant to Section 3 of the Agreement, execution by at least five (5) of the eligible jurisdictions within WRIA 9 representing at least seventy per cent (70%) of the affected population, Only the Original Parties signing this Extension shall be bound by the terms of the Agreement as extended by this Extension, The Agreement term is hereby extended through December 31,2006, except that billing for services provided by the Service Provider and payment for such services by the Parties executing this Extension may extend beyond December 31, 2006, until all such billings have been paid. This Extension may be executed in counterparts, All other terms of the Agreement shall remain unaffected by this Extension and shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Extension is executed by the entities so signing on the dates indicated below: Approved as to form' CITY OF ALGONA By: BY' Title: Title: Date: Date. I Approved as to form: By: Title' Date, Approved as to form: By: Title: Date: Approved as to form: By: Title: Date: Approved as to form: By: Title: Date: Approved as to form: By: Title: Date: CITY OF AUBURN By: Title: Date: CITY OF BLACK DIAMOND By: Title: Date: CITY OF BURIEN By: Title: Date: CITY OF COVINGTON By: Title' Date: CITY OF DES MOINES By: Title: Date: 2 Approved as ta farm' By: Title: Date: Approved as ta form: By: Title: Date: Approved as ta form: By: Title: Date: Approved as ta farm: By: Title: Date: CITY OF ENUMCLAW By: Title: Date: CITY OF FEDERAL WAY By: Title: Date: CITY OF KENT By: Title: Date' KING COUNTY By: Title: Date: 3 Approved as to form: By: Title: Date. Approved as to form: By: Title: Date: Approved as to form: By: Title: Date: Approved as to form: By: Title: Date: Approved as to form: By: Title: Date. CITY OF MAPLE VALLEY By: Title: Date: CITY OF NORMANDY PARK By: Title: Date: CITY OF RENTON By: Title: Date: CITY OF SEATAC By: Title: Date: CITY OF SEATTLE By: Title. Date' 4 Approved as to form. By: Title. Date: Approved as to form. By: Title: Date: CITY OF TUKWILA BY' Title: Date: CITY OF TACOMA By' Title: Date. 5 WRIA 9 Forum Approved 2006 Cost Shares Proposed REDUCED 2006 Jurisdiction Cost Shares WRIA9 City of Alaona 0,09% $ 317,19 WRIA9 City of Auburn . 462% $ 16,282,27 WRIA9 Black Diamond 0.99% $ 3,489,06 WRIA9 City of Burien 4.01% $ 14,132.44 WRIA9 City of Covinaton 1,87% $ 6,590 44 WRIA9 Cltv of Des Moines 2,97% $ 10,467,17 WRIA9 CItY of Enumclaw 0,91% $ 3,207.11 WRIA9 CItY of Federal Way 2.27% $ 8,000.16 WRIA9 City of Kent 11.95% $ 42,115,39 WRIA9 KinQ CountY 37,72% $ 132,936.60 WRIA9 City of Maple Valley 1,56% $ 5,497.91 WRIA9 City of Normandy Park 1,10% $ 3,876.73 WRIA9 City of Renton 2,95% $ 10,396,69 WRIA9 City of SeaTac 4.40% $ 15,506,92 WRIA9 City of Seattle 18.75% $ 66,080,63 WRIA9 City of Tukwila 3.85% $ 13,568,56 WRIA9 City of Tacoma $ 16,17000 $ 368,635.24 :- Community and Parks Committee October II, 2005 Present: Joe Duffie; Chair; Joan Hernandez, Pam Linder Steve Lancaster, Jack Pace, Ryan Larson, Peter Beckwith, Derek Speck, EVle Boykan, Stacy Hanson, Kevin Fuhrer, Gail Labanara, Lucy Lauterbach, Gordon Thompson -t- 1. \VRIA-9 Salmon Habitat Program Gordon showed a power point program about Kmg County's \VRIA 9(\Vater Resource Inventory Area 9) program. It showed the salmon habitat plan overview of what kinds of programs are envisioned for improving habitat, and a ratification plan for adopting the WRIA Plan, as well as the local role in implementing the Plan. The area extends from Puget Sound below M~gnolia in the north past Vashon Island and Maury Island in the South, and down the DuwamishlGreen River. Tukwila is in a transition zone where small fish acclimate between fresh and salt water, so it plays an important role in fish survival. Information. 2. Administrative Appeals Process Based on discussions at Council some months ago, a draft ordinance had been drafted which removed the City Council from most quasi-judicial decisions. Most administrative appeals that have gone to Council would instead go to a hearing examiner. The last quasi-judicial decision by Council concerned a new development of Winners, and an appeal from JoAnn Fabrics about the new building obscuring the view of JoAnn's, Committee members were generally supportive of the changes, but had some hesitation about giving up all the decisions. They agreed to send the ordinance to the CO\V and then to the Planning Commission, Recommend ordinance to CO\V. 3. Resolution Ratifving 'VIDA 9 Habitat Plan The Plan has been put together with the help of IS WRIAjurisdictions, and would lead to protecting habitat for salmon. Though it does not require jurisdictions to do projects, it is a guideline for shoreline development. The Committee requested that this item be brought back for consideration when Council Member Robertson returns, Reschedule. 4. Amendment to WRIA-9 \Vatershed Planning A proposal has been made to extend the current WRIA-9 Interlocal Agreement for one year. This will allow development of an implementation plan for the recently completed Habitat Plan, This extension will require member cities to again pay a WRIA fee, though it will be lower than previous years, Tukwila's portion will be $13,359, and it is in the budget. Recommend interlocal to COW. 5. Zoning Code Updates New language has been added to the zoning code regarding application for rezones. It gives better criteria for making decisions about rezones, and gives the DCD director more weight in making decisions on interpretations, The design review approval standards were also changed. Recommend changes to Planning Commission, then to COvV. 6. Relocation Assistance of Tenants In July, 2005 a provision in State law became available to require landlords to relocate tenants who have been displaced due to substandard housmg conditions, No relocation is required if the tenant caused the condition by their illegal conduct, if ~ COUNCIL AGE DA Szvosis Irrttrals ITEM IV O. ._I i 1� h i S 1G) 1 111eettng Date Prepared b_y Mayor's review Council review til‘ ,f0/ 11/14/05 RL AAJ'' I t Jt 1 3 -"Ale ITEM INFORMATION I CAS NUMBER. 05-146 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE. NOVEMBER 14, 2005 AGENDA ITEM TITLE Resolution Ratifying the WRIA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan. CATEGORY Dtscusszon AVIotzon Resolutzon Ordinance Btd Award Public Heanng Other Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 11/14/05 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Artg Date: SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PIV SPONSOR'S The Green /Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Water Resource Inventory Area SUIN MARY 9 Salmon Habitat Plan is now complete and ready for adoption. The finished Salmon Habitat Plan, "Making our Watershed Fit for a King is intended as a guide for use in habitat restoration and City procedures. Cooperation among Federal, state, and local agencies, tribes, etc, is essential to plan for and implement a salmon recovery plan. REVTIEI.VED BY COW Mtg CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DA'Z'E: 10/11/05 10/25/05 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. Approve Resolution. Commrr EE Forward to COW and then Regular with approval of resolution. COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED Fund Source: 301 Parks &Trails (page 22, 2005 CIP) Comments MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 11/14/05 1 MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS 11/14/05 I Information Memo dated October 11, 2005 1 Resolution Community Parks Committee Meeting Minutes from October 25, 2005 INFORMATION ME~MO Date: Subject: Mayor Mullet Public W orks Directo~ October 11, 2005 Green/Duwamish and Central Pue:et Sound \Vatershed Chinook Salmon Plan Habitat Plan Adoption ' Project No. OO-DR04 To: From: ISSUE Approve the GreenJDuwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Plan through Council resolution. BACKGROUND The City of Tukwila entered into an Interlocal Agreement with 15 other WRIA 9 jurisdictions to develop a salmon habitat plan. This plan, Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, is now complete and ready for adoption by the participating jurisdictions, ANALYSIS The WRIA 9 Watershed Planning Interlocal Agreement was established to draft a habitat recovery plan to guide local jurisdIctions in the recovery of Chinook salmon, With the completion of the plan, the participating jurisdictions can now decide whether to formally adopt the plan, The plan does not obligate jurisdictions to complete any particular project or program but is intended as a guidance document for use in habItat restoration and City procedures. It is intended that jurisdictlOns will review the plan's recommendations and implement the recommendations as each City sees appropriate. The adoption of this plan is exempt from SEP A environmental review under provisions of WAC 197-11-704(2)(b)(iii), ACTION Forward the resolution to Council to formally adopt this plan, RL:ad attachment: draft resolution (P:Projects\OOdrlJ4\WRIA 9 Info Memo - Plan Adop'ion Revised) DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, RATIFYING THE GREENIDUWAMISH AND CENTRAL PUGET SOUND WATERSHED, WATER RESOURCE INVENTORY AREA (WRIA-9) SALMON HABITAT PLAN, "MAKING OUR WATERSHED FIT FOR A KING." WHEREAS, in March 1999, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) listed the Puget Sound Chinook salmon evolutionary significant unit as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA); and WHEREAS, in November 1999, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) listed the Puget Sound buH trout distinct population segment as a threatened species under the ESA, and WHEREAS, significant areas of the GreenlDuwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water Resource Inventory Area 9, are designated by the Federal government as critical salmon habitat; and WHEREAS, coordination and cooperation among Federal, state, and local agencies, tribes, businesses, non-governmental organizations, landowners, citizens, and other interests are essential to plan for and implement a salmon recovery plan, and WHEREAS, the City supports cooperation at the WRIA level to set common priorities for actions among partners, efficient use of resources and investments, and distribution of responsibility for actions and expenditures; and WHEREAS, 17 local governments in WRIA-9 entered into an interlocal agreement in 2001 to Jointly fund development of the Green/Duwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, "Making our Watershed Fitfor a King," published August 10,2005; and WHEREAS, the WRIA-9 Salmon Habitat Plan, developed by a steering committee comprised of multiple interests, includes a wide variety of actions that focus on habitat recovery for Chinook salmon, bull trout, and other salmonids for the next ten years, and prioritizes them to guide efforts to recover the Green River Chinook salmon population; and WHEREAS, the WRIA-9 Salmon Habitat Plan is based upon a sound scientific foundation, and includes an adaptive management approach and funding strategy for implementation, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City hereby ratifies the GreenlDuwamish and Central Puget Sound Watershed, Water Resource Inventory Area 9 Salmon Habitat Plan, "Making our Watershed Fit for a King," dated August 2005 Section 2. This resolution does not obligate the City Council to future appropriations beyond current authority RFSOL VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of . 2005 ATIESTj AUTHENTICATED' Pamela Linder, Council President Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORlv! BY Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council. Resolution Number Office of the City Attorney C:IDocuments and SeUingst<\1I UsersIDesktoplKellylMSDA T AIResolutionsl IVRIA-9 Salmon Plan.dGc RL:ksn )]11012005 Page 1 of 1 Community and Parks Committee October 25,2005 Present: Joe Duffie, Chair; Joan Hernandez, Dennis Robertson Steve Lancaster, Bruce Fletcher, Ryan Larson, Kathryn Kertzman, Tracy Galloway, Brandon rv'Illes, Gall Labanara, Kevm Fuhrer, Paul Surek, Kimberly Matej, Kurt Chandler, Marty O'Bnen, Malcolm Neeley, Lucy Lauterbach, Jessica Breznau, J. Paul Blake-All NatIOns Cup 1. All Nations Cup Jessica explamed that All Nations Cup began when she realized many Immigrants played soccer m the Puget Sound region. Three years ago she asked some of them to put together teams that compnsed players from their home country, and twelve teams came together to play m a tournament. Now that has grown to national teams from 34 countries, and will also include women teams m 2006. She said the tournament features soccer games, but also includes a festlval wIth booths, dances, smgmg, costumes from native lands, and a general celebration of cultures. People come together, share, and generally have a good time, She asked if the CIty would be willmg to donate S15,000 to the effort. She had asked Seattle and a variety of other commumtIes, but they would not donate because It wasn't a neighborhood event, but rather a regional event beIng played in Tukwila. The Committee recommended funding the f:vent. Recommend $15,000 additional budget to Council. * 2. Resolution Ratifying \-VIDA 9 Salmon Habitat Plan Denms and Ryan explained how Tub-vila and 15 other commumties spent five years developing a plan for Improving salmon habitat in Puget Sound, The Plan recommends strategIes for encouragmg the fish. An example applicable to Tub-vila would be removing the flap gate on Gilham Creek. Although not every strategy can be fulfilled, the region and Tuhvila should make strides toward improvmg habitat to support a viable population of salmon. The mix of salt and fresh water m Tukwlla and Just north of the City make thIS an important area in the regIOn, as fish can spend valuable lengths oftlme in these waters. Recommend resolution to CO\V. 3. Pre-1937 Lots in the City Steve L explamed there are many very small lots that existed prior to 1937 when State law allowed citIes to regulate division of land and lot sizes, The pre- 1937 lots have never been examined for consistency with land use regulatIOns, and development of some of these lots in Allentown has resulted in homes that did not meet our standards. An ordinance was passed to regulate these small lots for the first time. Steve said the ordmance put a halt to the current development of these small lots for the tlme being, although some lots that were bought with the intention of development may be allowed some leeway As thmgs stand now, an owner could put together several of these lots to make a 6,500 foot lot to develop one home on. Steve asked the Committee if they supported DCD mvestlgation ofincentlves that could be given for redevelopment of the lots in a manner more supportive of current development standards, Some examples given were reducmg minimum lot sizes, using zero lot lines, or having alleys m the back for garages To do tl11s work would take several months, so would come back next year. The CommIttee supported domg research hke thIS, Information only. r w`.. GO UNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS f S%' Inrtral� ITEM No. t �1 6 I Meeting Date 1 Prepared by 1 Mayor's review Council review u, 1 11/14/05 JM a 7908 I 1 1 ITEM INFORMATION CAS NUMBER. 05-147 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE. NOVEMBER 14, 2005 AGENDA ITEM TITLE Resolution for Public Works Fee Schedule; Amend Ordinance No. 1932 for Storm and Surface Water Rates and Charges. CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance ['Bid Award Public Heating Other Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 11/14/05 Mtg Date 11/14/05 itftg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date: I SPONSOR Council illa Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R El Police PTY/ SPONSOR'S This City's sewer rate was last increased in 2004 and a rate change is needed to meet SUMMARY operational and capital expenditures. The monthly residential flat rate will increase from $7.00 to $8.00. The Storm and Surface Water Fund last had an increase in 2000. Again a rate change is needed for operating budget and capital expenses. The annual single family residential rate will increase from $52.00 to $62.00. The ordinance will change the rate structure so that it is included in the Public Works Fee Schedule Resolution. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utihttes Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE. 11/08/05 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN Approve PW Fee Resolution and Storm Surface Water Ordinance. CONMIIFIEE Forward to COW and then Regular with approval of resolution and ordinance. COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED Fund Source: 402 Sewer and 412 Storm Surface Water Comments 1 MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 11/14/05 1 MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS 11/14/05 I Information Memo dated November 1, 2005 with Rate Matrix TMC Chapter 14.32 Storm and Surface Water Rates Charges Ordinance Resolution Utilities Committee Meeting Minutes from November 8, 2005 VTUK2WOL1\ PUBWORKS \USERS1Gai11GAIL \CAS\Sewer SSW 3.4 Fee Resolution Ordin 11- 14- 05.doc INFORlvIATION l\1EMO To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor Mullet Public W arks Directo~ November 1, 2005 Sewer & Surface Water Rates for 2006 ISSUE Adopt an updated utility fee schedule that would include rate increases for both sewer and surface water to become effective January 1, 2006. BACKGROUND The last sewer rate increase was adopted under Resolution No. 1531, which became effective January 1, 2004. The Public Works Department has analyzed sewer and surface water rates in order to meet both operational and capital needs through the year 201 O. The rate model information (table attached) has a gradual sewer increase each year starting in 2006. The residential sewer rate would increase from $7,00 to $8,00 per month (the residential equivalent fee also has the Metro pass-through of $25.60). Surface water annual fees would increase from $52.00 to $62.00. An increase in surface water would occur every two years. Tukwila's surface water rate is still nearly the lowest among comparable cities in King County. Normandy Park recently formed a Surface Water Utility just a year ago and charges $10.00/month, or $120,OO/year. The information used to assemble the rate model includes data from treatment and operational needs as well as providing the funds necessary to keep the Capital Improvement Program on track. Some of this is to service the debt load for the low interest loans from the Public Works Trust Fund that will fulfill the completion of the Allentown & Foster Point Sewer Project. RECOlVIMENDATION Adopt the Surface Water Ordinance and the Public Works Fee Schedule Resolution. attachments: Rate Comparison Rate Matrix TMC 14,32 Surface Water Ordinance Public Works Fee Schedule Resolution (P:alice\UC 110805 Sewer & SSWM Rates 2(06) Sewer Rates for selected Neighboring Jurisdictions: Name of Community Single Family (monthly) Renton $ 39.03 Auburn 34.85 Seattle 34,22 Tukwila ($1.00 increase) 33.60 Kent 33.47 Val Vue Sewer District 32,60 Tukwila (Current)' 32,60 Friday Harbor $ 71.36 Surface Water Rates for selected Western Washington Cities: Name of Community Annual Rate Monthly Rate Bellevue $ 156,00 $ 13,00 Everett 138.00 11,50 Seattle 121,64 10.14 Tacoma 120.00 10,00 Normandy Park 120,00 10,00 Puyallup 108.00 9,00 Covington 108.00 9,00 King County 102,00 8,50 Des Moines (KC) 102,00 8,50 Kirkland (KC) 102 00 8,50 Mill Creek (KC) 102,00 8,50 Woodinville (KC) 102.00 8,50 Lakewood 9600 8.00 Edmonds 72,00 6.00 Mountlake Terrace 72.00 600 Tumwater 72,00 6.00 Kent 60,00 5,00 Tukwila 52.00 to 62.00 4.33 Algona 36,00 3,00 Lynnwood 30,00 2,50 (P:alice\UC 110805 Sewer & SSV&1 Rate Comparisons) City of Tukwila proposed Utility Rate Increases Monthly nthl Fees for Residential Customers WATER Purchased Pass-through (Average 1othtY rate with 10 ccf) +4% $2.98 to $3 10 $t20 +4% $3.29 to $3 42 $1.30 $3 19 to $3.29 $3 42 to $3 52 $1.00 $1.00 $3 52 to $3 63 $1.10 $4.00 City of Tukwila Wate e with 10 ccf) (Average monthly $1.00 City of Tukwila Water (Minimum Monthly Meter Charge) $4.60 +15% $7 to $8 $1.00 +10% $8 to $8 80 $0.80 +10% $970to$1070 $1.00 $4.80 SURFACE WATER City of Tukwila Surface leJan e& July) Annual Charg e divided monthly Annual Charge increase for chart $5.05 $3.30 $3.36 q:gail \cip \rate matrix $2.20 $19.65 11/9/2005 Chapter 1432 STORl\1 Al'JD SURFACE WATER RATES A.l'\J"D CHARGES Sections: l4.32,010Purpose 14.32.020 Definitions 14.32,030UtilIty Rates and ServIce Charges 14,32,040 Special Rates 14.32,050 Service Charge Adjustments 14.32,060Billing and Collectmg 14.32,070 Service Charge Revenues C 14.32 14.32.010Purpose A. The purpose of this chapter is to provide for revenue to construct, reconstruct, replace, improve, operate, repair, maintain, manage, administer, inspect, enforce facilities and activities for the stonn and surface water utility plan and utility. B. This chapter creates a system of rates and charges pursuant to RCW 35.67 for the stonn and surface water utility. (Ord, 1932 ~ l(part), 2000) 14.32.020 DefInitions The following words, when used in TMC Chapter 14,32 shall have the meaning identifIed below: 1. "Billing year" means the calendar year in which bills are sent, 2, "Developed Swface" means those surfaces whIch have altered the natural infiltratIOn or runoff patterns that are charactenstic of natural land as it existed prior to development and are not green and growing, landscaped, or submerged, Such surfaces shall mclude hard surfaces that prevent or retard the entry of water into the sOlI; to mclude, but not limIted to' roof tops, asphalt or concrete paving, driveways, parking lots, patio areas, storage areas, or other compacted surfaces, Such surfaces shall further include porous surfaces WhICh may accelerate the infiltration or transfer of surface or ground water; to include, but not limited to' infiltration pits, piles of rock or quarry spalls, constructed surface water drainage channels, or similar surfaces, 3, "Natural land" means parcels that have not been disturbed from theIr natural state in the last 25 years. 100% of the parcel must be natural land for the parcel to be classIfied as natural land, 4, "Parcel" means the smallest separately segregated unit or plot of land havmg an identified owner(s), boundaries, and area as defmed by the King County assessor and recorded in the Kmg County assessor's real property file or in the King County assessor's maps, 5, "Percent developed surface" means the quotient of the total area of developed surface on a parcel divided by the total area of the parcel. For purposes of determining the rate category, the resultmg percentage shall be rounded to the nearest whole percent. 6. "Undeveloped surface" means any surface area that is green, growing, or landscaped and supporting vegetation and shall include land which is totally submerged, 7. "Property owner of record" means the person or persons recorded by the county assessor to be the owner(s) of property and/or to whom property tax statements are dIrected, 8 "Rate category" means the classification of properties, based upon the estImated percentage of developed surface on the parcel, for purposes of establishing UtIlIty Service Charges, 9, "Service charge" means that charge Imposed on all parcels within the CIty by the storm and surface water utility, and shall be the rate category to which the parcel IS assIgned multiplIed times the total area of the parcel rounded to the nearest 4,356 square feet (lIlOth of one acre) P:\Ryan L\TMC 14.32 Updated 2005,doc 10. "Singlejamily residential parcel" shall mean any parcel which contams one, two or three smgle-family UllltS. A "duplex" is equal to two single-family UllltS A "tnplex" is equal to three smgle- family units, 11. "Utility" means the City storm and surface water management utility. (Ord. 1932 ~ 1 (part), 2000) 14.32,030Utility Rates and Service Charges A, A utility rate and service charge is imposed on every parcel within the City and the owner(s) thereof. This includes but is not limited to'parcels owned by the City, by the State, by the County, and all other parcels, B. The rate category established herein shall be based upon the contribution of surface and storm water from a parcel to the system. The amount of contribution to the system shall be measured by the estimated percentage of developed ;surface area on the parcel. The service charge imposed on each parcel shall be equal to the rate category into which the parcel fits multiplied times the total area of the parcel rounded to the nearest 4,356 square feet (1/10 of one acre), Single-family residential parcels are grouped together into one rate category and will pay one service charge per parcel. This rate category and service charge is determined by estimating the average percent devel- oped surface and the average total area of all single-family parcels in the City, C. Utility rate categories and annual service charges shall be as follows, charged in accordance with the fee schedule to be adopted by motion or resolution of the Tukwila City Council, Servicc Charge Category per acre per 1,356 sq. f+.. 1. Natural $61.20 ~ 2. 0 20% $139.10 $13.91 , . . ~ 3. 21 50% $255,60 $25.56 . , , '" 1. 51 70% $381.10 $38.11 . . 1 ~ ~~ 5, 71 85% $159.10 $15.91 . , , '" ~ 6. 86 100% $536.00 $53.60 , , , '" ~~ ,n --rn ,n, ~1 b 7. Singlc family . , , $52.00 NIA D. Pursuant to RC\V 90.03,525, all parcels within a limited access highway owned by the State Department of Transportation shall be subject to service charges that are equal to 30% of that which would result ifthe service charges were calculated according to section 14.32.030C of the Tukwila Municipal Code. E. Each annual bill will be rounded up to the nearest number of cents. The minimum annual service charge shall be $6.'12. This charge is equal to the annual charge for a 4,356 square foot parcel in the lowest rate category (1, Natural). (Ord, 1931 ~ 1 (part), 2000) P,\Ryan L\TMC 14.32 Updated 2005 doc 14,32.040 Special Rates Every person 62 years of age or older (if married, then either spouse) and every person totally and permanently disabled and who is paying directly for such separately bIlled surface water service either as owner, purchaser or renter and whose individual disposable income, if a smgle person, or whose combined disposable income, if a married couple, from all sources is less than $26,000 $32,000 per year, shall pay a rate equal to 50% of surface water service charges. Every such person shall file with the Finance Department their affidavit that he or she IS qualified to be charged the special rate, Such affidavits are to contain infonnation as required by the Fmance Director in order to establIsh eligibility, Each affidavit will also include an unqualified promise to infonn the City of any changes in financial condition that would disqualify the person for special rates. The Finance Director may require affidavits on an annual basis if deemed necessary. In addition, the applicant J,llust own and live on a single-family parcel subject to the utility charge. Only one parcel o\ovned by an applicant may receive a low-income, semor citizen or disabled person credit. If eligible for a credit, the applicant shall be billed at one-half of the service charge applicable to each single-family residential parcel. (Ord, 1932 ~ I (part), 2000) 14,32.050Service Charge Adjustments A. Any person receivmg a utility service charge may apply in writing to the utility for a service charge adjustment. Filing such a request does not extend the period for payment of the charge. Requests for adjustments on delinquent accounts will not be acted upon until paid in full. B. A request for a billing adjustment may be based on one or more of the following' 1. The total area of the non-single-family residential parcells Incorrect; 2. The percent of developed surface on the non-single-family resIdential parcel(s) for the billing year for which the servIce charge is imposed is incorrect and the actual percent of developed surface on the parcel places it in a rate category different than that used for calculation of the service charge; 3. The parcel or portion of it is outside the CIty and the service charge is calculated on that portion outside the City; 4, The service charge calculated IS erroneous In applying the tenns of this chapter. C, Application for adjustments may be made to the utility. The burden of proof shall be on the applicant to show that the rate adjustment sought should be granted. All decisions of the Director of Public Works shall be final. D, Applications for service charge adjustments shall be filed within 90 days ofthe billing date. E. The Director of Public Works shall establish processes and procedures for reviewing requests for adjustments. (Ord. 1932 ~I(part:), 2000) 14.32.060Billing and Collecting A. All parcels subject to a service charge shall be billed twice a year based upon the rate category and acreage applicable to such parcels as of November I ofthe year prior to the billing year, B. Each bill shall be equal to one-half of the total annual service charge applicable to the parcel. C. Bills will be sent to the property owners during the months of January and July. D. Property owners shall be responsible for all bills not paid. E. The total amount of the bill shall be due within 60 days of the date of the bill. After that period the bill shall be considered delinquent. P:\Ryan L\TMC 14.32 Updated 200S.doc F. The service charge or any part thereof which becomes delinquent shall bear interest as provided in RCW 35.67.200 at the rate of 8% per annum, or such rate as may hereafter be authorized by law, computed on a monthly basis from the date of delinquency until paid, Q, The City shall have a lien for all delinquent and unpaid service charges, including interest thereon, against any parcel for which the service charges are delinquent, as provided by RCW 35.67.200. /... fee of$16,OO or The current charges imposed by the King County Records and Elections division shall be charged to allliened parcels to recov.er the cost of placing and removing the lien on the parcel. Pursuant to RCW 35.67.215, the hen is effective for up to one year's delinquent service charges without the necessIty of any writing or recordmg of the lien with the King County Records and Elections Division. In the case of foreclosure actions to collect delinquencies, the City shall seek also to collect reimbursement of reasonable costs of collection including, but not limited to, attorney's fees, staff time and filing fees. (Ord. 1932 ~ I (part). ~OOO) 14.32.070 Service Charge Revenues All moneys obtained pursuant to TMC Chapter 14,32 shall be credited and deposited in the storm and surface water management utility fund created by TMC Chapter 14.28. Moneys so obtained shall be spent for the purposes allowed in that chapter. (Ord. 1932 ~ 1 (part), 2000) P,\Ryan L\TMC 14.32 Updated 2005 doc fO!rQjmR~ [lU Ud L~ tr u AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1932, AS CODIFIED AT SECTION 14,32 OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO STORM AND SURFACE WATER RATES AND CHARGES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to have in place an equitable and adequate rate structure to finance the operation and maintenance of the storm and surface water utility; and WHEREAS, the City needs additional revenues to adequately fund the storm and surface water utility and capital improvements; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1, Ordinance No. 1932, as codified at TMC 14,32.030, is hereby amended to read as follows: 14,32,030 Utility Rates and Service Charges A. A utility rate and service charge is imposed on every parcel within the City and the owner(s) thereof, This includes but is not limited to parcels owned by the City, by the State, by the County, and all other parcels, B The rate category established herein shall be based upon the contribution of surface and storm water from a parcel to the system. The amount of contribution to the system shall be measured by the estimated percentage of developed surface area on the parcel. The service charge imposed on each parcel shall be equal to the rate category into which the parcel fits multiplied times the total area of the parcel rounded to the nearest 4,356 square feet (1/10 of one acre), Single-family residential parcels are grouped together into one rate category and will pay one service charge per parcel. This rate category and service charge is determined by estimating the average developed percent surface and the average total area of all single-family parcels in the City C. Utility rate categories and annual service charges shall be charged in accordance with the fee schedule to be adopted by motion or resolution of the Tukwila City Council. D Pursuant to RCW 90,03.525, all parcels within a limited access highway owned by the State Department of Transportation shall be subject to service charges that are equal to 30% of that which would result if the service charges were calculated according to section 14,32.030C of the Tukwila Municipal Code. E. Each annual bill will be rounded up to the nearest number of cents, The minimum annual service charge shall be equal to the annual charge for a 4,356 square foot parcel in the lowest rate category (I, Natural). C:IDocuments and Seuings\All UsersIDesktop\Kelly\!vfSDATA\Ordinances\Storm and Surface Water Rates.doc RL:ksn 1111012005 Page 1 of 3 Section 2, Ordinance No. 1932, as codified at TMC 14.32.040, is hereby amended to read as follows: 14.32,040 Special Rates Every person 62 years of age or older (if married, then either spouse) and every person totally and permanently disabled and who is paying directly for such separately billed surface water service either as owner, purchaser or renter and whose individual disposable income, if a single person, or whose combined disposable income, if a married couple, from all sources is less than $~2,000 per year, shall pay a rate equal to 50% of surface water service charges, Every such person shall file with the Finance Department their affidavit that he or she is qualified to be charged the special rate. Such affidavits are to contain information as required by the Finance Director in order to establish eligibility Each affidavit will also include an unqualified promise to inform the City of any changes in ftnancial condition that would disqualify the person for special rates. The Finance Director may require affidavits on an annual basis if deemed necessary In addition, the applicant must own and live on a single-family parcel subject to the utility charge, Only one parcel owned by an applicant may receive a low- income, senior citizen or disabled person credit. If eligible for a credit, the applicant shall be billed at one-half of the service charge applicable to each single-family residential parcel. Section 3, Ordinance No. 1932, as codified at TMC 14.32,060, is hereby amended to read as follows: 14,32.060 Billing and Collecting A. All parcels subject to a service charge shall be billed twice a year based upon the rate category and acreage applicable to such parcels as of November 1 of the year prior to the billing year B. Each bill shall be equal to one-half of the total annual service charge applicable to the parcel. C. Bills will be sent to the property owners during the months of January and July D Property owners shall be responsible for all bills not paid. E. The total amount of the bill shall be due within 60 days of the date of the bill. After that period the bill shall be considered delinquent. F The service charge or any part thereof which becomes delinquent shall bear interest as provided in RCW 35,67,200 at the rate of 8% per annum, or such rate as may hereafter be authorized by law, computed on a monthly basis from the date of delinquency until paid, G, The City shall have a lien for all delinquent and unpaid service charges, including interest thereon, against any parcel for which the service charges are delinquent, as provided by RCW 35,67.200. The current charges imposed by the King County Records and Elections division shall be charged to allliened parcels to recover the cost of placing and removing the lien on the parcel. Pursuant to RCW 35,67,215, the lien is effective for up to one year's delinquent service charges without the necessity of any writing or recording of the lien with the King County Records and Elections Division. In the case of foreclosure actions to collect delinquencies, the City shall seek also to collect reimbursement of reasonable costs of collection including, but not limited to, attorney's fees, staff time and filing fees, C:iDocuments and SettingsWI Users\Des~~op\Kell}'\MSDATA\Ordinances\Stonn and Surface Water Rates.doc RL:ksn 1111012005 Page 2 of3 Section 4. Severability, If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 5, Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force and effect on January 1, 2006. , PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of . 2005 ATTEST / AUTHENTICATED. Steven M, Mullet, Mayor Jane E, Cantu, CMC, City Clerk Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council, Published, Effective Date: Ordinance Number APPROVED AS TO FORM BY Office of the City Attorney C:IDocuments and Seuings\A1I UsersIDesklop\Kelly\MSDATA\OrdinanceslSlOnTI and Surface Weter Retes.doc RL:ksn \III 012005 Page 3 of 3 -If~ ~f~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING A PUBLIC WORKS FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, Tukwila's Public Works Department's surface water rates have not been increased since 2000, and WHEREAS, Tukwila's fees are significantly lower than the average of neighboring jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, the City needs to recoup a greater percentage of the cost of operating and maintaining its infrastructure, and sewer and surface water utilities; and WHEREAS, adopting the fees in a separate document will allow them to be more easily updated in the future; NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Tukwila, Washington, hereby resoves as follows: li'ublic Works fees will be charged according to the following schedule: Public Works Fee Schedule Permit Description Cost Type A (Short-Tenn Nonprofit) $50 Type B (Short-Tenn Profit) $100 $250 Application Base Fee, plus four components based on construction value Type C 1) Plan Review (Disturbance of City Right -of-Way) 2) Construction Inspection 3) Pavement Mitigation 4) A Grading Plan Review Type D (Long- Tenn) $100 Type E $100 (Potential Disturbance of City Right -of-Way) $250 Processing Fee, plus $5,000 cash deposit, Type F (Blanket Pennits) withdraw $l OO/instance for inspection Additional Inspections $47.00 per inspections Franchise- Telecommunications $5,000 Administrative Fee Franchise - Cable $5,000 plus 5% of total revenue Street Vacation $1,200 $500 Processing Fee, plus 17% administrative fee, Latecomer's Agreements plus $500 segregation fee Flood Zone Control $50 C"\DOCUME-l\iane\LOCALS-1 \Temp\RESOLU- I .DOC Public \Vorks Fee Schedule Continued Permit Description Water Meter Installation ,75" I" 1.5" 2" 3" 4" 6" Water Meter Deduct Copy of CIty of Tukwila's Inrrastructure Design and Construction Standards \ ResIdential Sewer Service (single dwelling unit) Residential Sewer Service (multiple dwelling umt, peilllanent type) Commercial and Industrial Sewage Service Sewer Late Charge Surface Water Utility Rates per year Category 1. Natural 2, 0 - 20% Developed Surface 3, 21- 50 % Developed Surface 4. 51 -70% Developed Surface 5. 71- 85% Developed Surface 6, 86 - 100% Developed Surface 7. Single Family Residential Parcels C:\DOCUN!E-I \jane\LOCALS-I \T emp\RESO LV-I.DOC Cost $ 600 1,100 2,400 2,800 4,400 7,800 12,500 $25 $50 Flat rate of$8.00 per month (TMC 14.16.030 No, I) Flat rate $8,00 per month for each dwelling unit (TMC 14.16,030No, 2) Flat rate of$14.00 per month and in addition any usage over 750 cubic feet of water per month shall be at the rate of$14 00 per 750 cubic feet. (TMC 14.16,030 No, 4) $5.00 per month on sewer accounts more than 30 days III arrears. (TMC 14.16.030 No, 5) Service Charge Service Charge Per acre Per 4,356 sq. ft, $ 77.00 $ 7.70 $167.30 $16.73 $306.70 $30.67 $457.70 $45.77 $551.30 $55.13 $643.20 $64.32 $ 62.00 per parcel N/A Utilities Committee November 8, 2005 Present: Dave Fenton, Chair; Joan Hernandez, Jim Haggerton hm Morrow, Gall Labanara, Ryan Larson, Pat Brod111, Lucy Lauterbach ~ 1. Sewer and Surface 'Vater Rates Staff has, wIth Council concurrence, scheduled rate ./C' increases for all three utIlItIes over the next five years The next rate increase wIll be 111 2006, and it will be In both Sewer and Surface Water A list ofJunsdictIons' surface water rates was shown for companson, and Tub-vIla's rates wIll stIll be lower than all other communitIes except Algona and Lynnwood, Another change bemg started'wlth thIS fund is to move rates from reqUIring an ordmance change, to being In a resolutIOn, whIch IS easIer to change more frequently, Recommend rates to CO\V. \ 2. Purchase of a Pre-Owned Generator for Minkler For emergency purposes, a generator has been needed at the Minkler shops. The opportumty to buy a high qualIty generator came up thIS summer when the former "Vade Cook bUIldmg was taken over by Teamsters, and the generator was found to be an extra one, It has been tested by compames that know about generators, and has been found to be powerful enough to easIly supply power needed for the shops and nearby LIft Station #3, It wIll reqUIre replacing the panel at the shops, The generator yosts $15,000, and is worth $40,000. Information. 3. Third Quarter Reports The CommIttee went through the third quarter reports for all the Utilities and complImented Jim on his department and staff for their excellence, Reports approved. ~:r ~ . // " {. 4 CommIttee chaIr approval Minutes by L. Lauterbach COUNCIL AGENDA SIWOPSIS Imirals ITEMNO. -of Q! 0 tlleetznT Date Prepared by Mayor's review Co b. rc�ty v +��k. 10/17/05 .-t, 1 .,,y.- 1 l `�0 1 10/24/05 1 LL 1 Lc 'CI L rsoa 11/7/05 LL 4" 1 11/14/05 1 LL 1 1 ITEM INFORMATION, CAS NUMBER. 05-136 I ORIGINAL' AGENDA DATE. 10/17/05 AGENDA ITEM TITLE 2006 Budget and CIP Review CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bic Award Public Hearing Other Mtg Date 10/17/05 Mtg Date illtg Date rlitg Date rlltg Date Mtg Date rlltg Date SPONSOR Council Mayor Adrn Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PIV SPONSOR'S Review the CIP and budget pages reviewed in committee to this point. SUMMARY i REVIEWED BY COW Mt CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. ['Planning Comm. DATE. 10/10/ 05; 10/11/05; and 10/17/05 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN Review 2006 CIP and budget 1 COMMITTEE As applicable- recommended budgets COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED Fund Source: Comments 1 MTG. DATE 1 RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 1 10/17/05 1 Reviewed portions; review to continue at 10/24/05 meeting. 1 10/24/05 Continued review and forwarded to 11/7/05 mtg. 1 11/7/05 Continued review and forwarded to 11/14/05 mtg. MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS 10/17/05 1 Memo from L. Lauterbach dated October 13, 2005 10/24/05 1 Memo from L. Lauterbach dated October 18, 2005 1 11/7/05 I Memo from L.Lauterbach dated 10/25/05 I 11/14/05 Memo from L. Lauterbach dated 11/9/05 1 1 1 To CIty CouncIl From' Lucy Lauterbach Date November 9, 2005 Subject: Continued Budget Review You have only Parks and Golfleft to review m the ClP, The following are a goal to review at the meetmg November 14th, It's a lot to review, but if you move steadIly, you can finish the lIst. Budget Review 11/14 Street Maintenance p, 132-133 Contributions/Fund Balance p. 134 Hotel/Motel Tax p 135 Residential Streets pp 137-138 Bridges, Commm Streets pp. 139-141 301 Fund Land AcquisItion p. 149 302 Fund Facility Replacmnt p 150 General Government p, 151 Water pp, 153-157 Sewer pp 158-161 Water/Sewer Bonds pp. 162-163 Surface Water pp 168-171 Equipment Rental pp 173-175 Golf Enterprise FundCIP pp. XXI-XXII Parks & Rec 301 Fund pp. 6-19 CIP Golf CIP pp.166-167 Golf Budget Book pp 164-166 Alis Commission pp 38-39 Park CommissIOn pp, 40-41 LIbrary Advisory Bd p, 42 Parks & Rec pp. 60-61 Rec Services pp, 62-65 Aquatics pp 66-67 Park Mamtenance pp 68-69 PolIce Admin pp 81-85 Patrol pp. 86-87 Records/Evidence pp, 88-89 InvestigatIOns pp, 90-91 GamblmglSpecial Ops p 92 Cnme/TrnglTraff/S Ops pp93-96 Tentative Agenda Schedule MONTH MEETING1- MEETING 2- MEETING 3- MEETING 4 - REGULAR C.O.W. REGULAR C.O.W. c_ u November 7 14 , 21 28 SIll _ General See agenda packet Special Presentation, ElectIOn Day cover sheet for this 2006 marketing 11111_ week's agenda initIatIves (Seattle (November 14, 2005 Southside Visitor Veterans' Day Committee of the Services) (City offices closed) Whole Meeting) Appointment: 24111_ Lodging Tax AdvIsory Thanksgiving Day Board (City offices closed) New Busmess: 25111 -Day after lnterlocal agreement with the City of Thanksgiving Des Momes regardmg (City of{ices closed) Seattle Southslde Visitor SerVIces December 5 12 19 27 (Tuesday) 2611- Christmas Day- observed (City offices closed) January 3 (Tuesday) 9 17 (Tuesday) 23 2"d - New Years Day--observed (City offices closed) 3Ull - Fifth This Committee of the Monday of the Whole meeting to be month-no immediately followed Council meeting by a Special j\;leeting scheduled Upcoming Meetings & Events NOVEMBER 2005 14th (Mondav ? Transportation Cmte, 5.00 PM (CR #1) 18th (Fridav) ? Community Affairs & Parks Cmte, 5'00 PM (CR #3) Crime Hot Spots Task Force Mtg., ]O;OOA"I (CR #5) Domestic Violence Task Force Mtg., ]2:00 Noon (TuJ.:wila Community Center, in Aftg. Room A) PLEASE NOTE SPECIAL' MEETING LOCA nON TillS MONTH, Chipper Day ] 0:00 AM to 1:00 PM ,. Civil Service Commission, 5:00 PM (CR #3) )- Parks Commission, 5.30 PM (Community Center) .....:...J 7ijD" }> City Council Committee of the Whole Mtg., 7:00 PM (Council Chambers) 21st Monda }> Finance & Safety Cmte, 4:00 PM (CR #3) PU:.\SE NOTE EARL\' START TIME. }> Library Advisory' Board, 7;00 PM (Foster Library) ? .23rd Wednesda) Thanksgiving Meal for Senior Citizens (Sponsored by Tukwila Rotary and TukwiJa 's Senior Program) II :00 AM to 2:00 PM Tukwi/a Community Center Free! Ticket is required and space is limited. Tickets may be picked up at the Community Center riday) 26th Saturdav) Highway 99 Trash Pickup Day 9:00 - 10:00 A\1 For locatioll call Donna at 206-242-5556 THANKSGIVING DAY DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING City offices closed City offices closed }> City Council Regular Mtg.. 7:00 Pl\1 (Council Chambers) ? COPCAB This month's COPCAB meeting has been rescheduled to Wednesday, November 30, ~ Court > Apartment Managers' Networking Lunch: Periodically as scheduled. Contact Robbie Burns at 206-243-6506. > Arts Commission: ]st Tues" 5:00 PM, Tukwila Community Center Contact Kimberly Afatej at 206-767-2342. > Chamber of Commerce's Tukwila Government and Community Affairs Committee: ]st Tues.. ]2:00 Noon, Chamber Offices. Contact Nalley Damon at 206-575-1633. > Chipper Days, sponsored by the Wash. State Dept, of Agriculture: 3rd Sat., 10:00 A',\to ]:00 PM, Foster HS main parking lot. Dispose ofprunings and plant materials from the ]onghomed beetle quarantine area. Drive your truckload of materials to the parking lot and help will be provided to unload, chip and dispose of materials free of charge. Be sure to bring ID with quarantine area address. > City Council Committee of Whole (C.O,W,) Meeting: 2nd & 4th Mon" 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall. >>City Council Regular Meeting: 1st & 3rd Mon., 7:00 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall. > Civil Service Commission: 2nd Mon., 5'00 PM, Cont: Room #3. Contact Bev Willison at 206-433-1844 > Community Affairs & Parks Committee: 2nd & 4th Tues., 5:00 PM, Cont: Room #3. Agenda items for 11/15/05 meeting: (A) Project completion and acceptance-Tukwila Pool high peiformance coating project. (B) 2005 Third Quarter Report. >COPCAB (Community Oriented Policing Citizens Adv. Board): 4th Wed" 6:30 PM. Conf. Rm #5 Marja Alurray (206-433-7175). > Crime Hot Spots Task Force: 3rd Wed., ]0:00 AM, Cont: Room #5 COlltact Marja Murray at 206-433-7175. }> Domestic Violence Task Force: 3rd Thurs., ]2:00 Noon, Cont: Room #5, Contact Evie Boykall or Stacy Hallsen at 206-433-7180. > Equity & Diversity Commission: ]st Thurs., 5 ]5 PM. Showalter Middle Schoo] Library Contact Lucy Lauterbach at 206-433-1834 > Finance & Safety Committee: ]st & 3rd Mon., 5:00 PM, Conf. Room #3 ? Highway 99 Action Committee: 2nd Tues., 7:00 PM, Tukwila Community Center Contact Chief Dave Haynes at 206-433-1812. ?Human Services Advisory Brd: 2nd FrL of even months, ]0:00 A"I, Hwnan Services Office. COlltact Evie Boykan at 206-433-7180. ? Human Services Providers: I] .30 A',\, TCC, (tentative schedule: 3/]8, 6/] 7,9116, ]212). COlltact Stacy Hansell at 206-433-7181 > Library Advisory Board: 3rd Wed., 7:00 P~I, Foster Library Contact Bruce Fletcher at 206-767-2343 >>Lodging Tax Advisory Committee: Every other month (or as scheduled), ]2 NOON. Contact Katherine Kertzmall at 206-575-2489 > Parks Commission: 3rd Wed., 5.30 PM, Senior Game Room at Community Center Contact Kimberly Matej at 206-767-2342. > Planning CommissionlBoard of Architectura] Review: 4th Thurs., except 2nd Thursday in Nov & Dec., 7:00 P:-'I, Council Chambers at City Hall. Colllact WYlletta BivellS at 206-431-3670. > Transportation Committee: 2nd & 4th Mon., 5:00 PM. Conf. Room # I Agenda items for 11/14/05 meeting: (A) Transportation elemell/ with Plannillg Commission recommendations. (B) Concurrency ordinance. (C) 1mpactfee strUCl/lre. (D) Developer agree- ment ordinance. > Utilities Committee: 1st & 3rd Tues., 5:00 PM, Cont: Room #] ~ Court = Busy Court andlor Jury Calendar (noted to alert employees and citizens of potential parking difficulty).