HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2005-04-11 Item 4A - Resolution - Reject All Bids for Allentown / Foster Point Water and Sewer Improvement Co UNCIL A GENOA Siwosis
Initials ITEM No.
_r �11,� Meeting Date Prepared by I Mayor's review Council review
�r t1.1 r 4/11/05 BG V 1 5
rsoa I C
1 1 1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 05-061 ORIGINAL AGENDA DAIE: APRIL 11, 2005
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Reject all Re -bids for Allentown /Foster Point Water Sewer Improvement Project
CA 1'EGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award n Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Date Mtg Date 4/11/05 Mtg Date llitg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adth Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PTV
SPONSOR'S All three bids submitted for the re -bid of the Allentown /Foster Point Water Sewer
SUMMARY Improvement Project were over the budgeted amount. This resolution will reject all bids.
Propose to apply for additional Public Works Trust Fund money in May with results in
August. Project would be delayed until 2006.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. n CA &P Cmte n F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. (l Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 4/5/05
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPoNsoR /ADMIN. Reject all bids by resolution.
COMMI11'EE To COW with recommendation to reject all bids by resolution
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
$6,401,536.00 $6,000,000.00
Fund Source: 403.01 Water, 403.02 Sewer 412 Surface Water
Comments: Expenditure Required is only the lowest bid amount and does not include contingency or construction
management costs.
MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
4/11/05
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
4/11/05 Information Memo dated March 25, 2005
Bid Opening from March 17, 2005
Article on Double -Digit Inflation
Budget Analysis
Attachments E (3 options on connection fees) and Attachments D F
Map of Allentown Phase II and Foster Point
Resolution rejecting all bids
1 Utilities Committee Minutes from April 5, 2005
INFOR1\1ATION MEMO
To:
Mayor Mullet
Public Works Director~
March 25, 2005
Allentown/Foster Point Water & Sewer Improvements
Project No. Ol-SW02
BID RESULTS
From:
Date:
Subject:
ISSUE
All three bids for the Allentown/Foster Point Water & Sewer Improvements came in over budget, even
with a reduction in scope from the October 2004 bids.
BACKGROUND
In October 2004, the City bid the Allentown/Foster Point Water & Sewer Improvements project and the
project came in over budget by $917 ;088.80. The City Council directed staff to reduce the project
scope and re-bid the project.
ANALYSIS
The City received three bids for the reduced scope of work for the Allentown/Foster Point project. All
three bids were higher in cost than the October 2004 rejected low bid. The project now has a shortfall
of $1.546 million dollars.
The higher project costs are attributed to the steep rise in costs of basic construction commodities:
~ The cost of diesel fuel since January 2005 has gone up 60 cents a gallon, and most
construction equipment runs on diesel fuel.
~ Ductile iron pipe has gone up $4.00 per foot. The project has over 10,000 feet of ductile pipe.
~ PVC plastic sewer pipe has risen in cost by 20.9% per the March 14, 2005, Engineering
News-Record (ENR) construction cost survey. The project has over 12,000 feet of PVC
sewer pipe and 6,000 feet of PVC storm pipe.
~ Steel used in construction has risen in cost by 18.5 % per the March 14, 2005, ENR cost
survey. Steel is used in the construction of the two sewer lift stations.
OPTIONS
1) Postpone the project and apply for more Public Works Trust Fund loan money to complete
the project. Construction would start in 2006 with completion in 2007, if the loan were
approved.
2) Contact PWTF to determine if we can split the project and keep the existing loan.
3) Split the project into numerous phases, yet we would still need a PWTF loan.
4) Use other City monies to make up the shortfall funding to get the project completed in early
2006. Raise the proposed connection fee of $10,000 to $12,000 to cover the increased
project costs.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Reject all bids by resolution and pursue additional funding, including applying for a new Trust Fund loan.
MC:lw
(p:Projec!S\A. SW ProjeclS\OISW02\memo032505 AJlemown Foster Point Bids)
CITY OF TUKWILA
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
Jane E. Cantu. CMC. City Clerk
Allentown/Foster Point Water & Sewer Improvements
Project No. 01-SW02
BID OPENING
March 17, 2005 - 10:00 a.m.
The following does NOT represent a Bid Award
Clerical Notes:
1. Bids. are opened in order of time received.
2. Basis of bid award will be on Schedule A.
3. Schedule C - Additive Alternative - mayor may not be awarded, depending upon difference between base
bid and City budget. (Page P-3).
4. One open, unsealed bid for a Caterpillar Model D40P1S was submitted by NC Power Systems, Co. and is on
file with the City Clerk's Office.
BIDDER NAME .
DATE/TIME...
RECEIVED ... ...
. . n_. ...____.. __._ .-"n__ ____..._______m""__..__..
...... . m_._. _.____....___.. ...._. p_
. ... _ .._ ._____'___.__m__...._..... .......__...........n
. ._________mn.__. ....... _
. . _,n_ '___H__'__ ......_............_____.
. . _.... '__m.Un ___________.__um.m._____...... dO.
.. ..... .. ...
. ._. ....n_.-u._,_.._... ...._.__.__..________.____.
.. ..... .............
. .... . _._, _.. _. u__ _.___m _.__. _____._m___n.....
. - __ __nn.____nn___m_._..........
..___. ___________.n___n_...
._,_.____ - ___.__n..........._....... _. ..... .._ .
. ....
. ... ... -,- - --_...-.--- .-., -...
.. .. ... .... . . ... . .
......... ...- . ......
. ..-. - ._._-.--.. .--...---- ------.----------.
.. ...... -----...--.--.-.
. ... . -. - ..-.
. .... -- ---- .-------- ------- ----- --.--------.--. .
. ......---.---- -""---. ..-..-. ..-. ...
. . .."" ..-.....- ..-..
. .----- -----------------------.---..-- .--.-----.
. . ... ..... . .
... . ....
... -. ----------------------....--.-.-...----..-------.--.
. -- ---..-...... ...-......-..
. ...... . .. - -...... ---.----..
.. ... . .. . . -..
. . -.. ... -..-. -.---. ----..- -- --.
..... ..-P-------------.------.--- ...
. .. . . . .. . .
..BI[)$i:c:U IUTY .....
p I.tE~EN.-r:?$r.nn
1 ADDENDUM
ACKNOWI..ED(;E.D ..
SCHEDULEC-
.BASEBID
(Inc. WSST)
James W. Fowler Co.
03-17-05 @ 3:38 p.m.
YES
YES
$7,752,000.00
$196,384.00
3
R. L. Alia Co.
03-17-05 @ 4:50 p.m.
YES
YES
$6,401,536.00
$532,560.00
1
MidMountain
Contractors, Inc.
03-17-05 @ 4:53
The above figures appear as written within bid documents; and as read aloud at bid opening.
THEY DO NOT however, REPRESENT ANY BID AWARD; apparent low, or otherwise.
DATED this 17th day of March, 2005.
/s/
Robert H. Baker, CMC, Deputy City Clerk
-
!
-----
. Cost Report Economics
By Tim Grogan and Tudor Hampton
--<
Double-Digit Inflation Takes .Hold
Stronger energy prices and a weaker dollar prop up higher prices
Inflation found a niche market in
construction, maintaining a double-
digit pace while remaining moderate
in the overall economy. Higher
energy prices and a weaker dollar
are helping to consolidate last year's cost
gains. But rising interest rates IIlay offer
some relief as .they cool off the record
housing market, easing price pressure on
some building materials.
The good news during the first quar-
ter is that the pricing volatility that made
estimating a dangerous game in 2004
eased, but not before inflicting consider-
able damage. Of 29 construction-related
producer price indexes compiled by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics, only four
began the year with annual increases of
less than 5 %. Half of the products have
double-digit price gains, including four
with annual increases of more than 20%.
Oil prices near record levels are help-
ing inflation spread from steel and other
commodities to petroleum-based prod-
ucts. The average price of \Vest Texas
intermediate crude ended last year 55%
higher than the previous year. Those ris-
ing prices held through the first quarter
of 2005, averaging $48 per barrel or $26
more than the same period in 2002 when
inflation was not a factor.
Higher oil prices are just starting to
show up in some construction materials.
BLS reported a 1.5% increase in asphalt
paving prices in January, with prices now
6.2 % higher than a year ago. Plastic con-
struction products now cost 7.6% more
Rising interest
rates should cool
off large price
11ik.es for lumber
and wallboard.
. High oil prices
are inlpacring
asphalt, PVC
and insulation
products.
$lbol
50
43
36
29
22
15
Oil Prices
10 20 30 40 10 20 30 40 10 20 30 4010 20
2002 2003 2004
SOURCE: GLOBAL INSIGHTS. AVERAGE PRICE OF WEST TEXAS INTERMEDIATE CRUDE 2005 RRST QUARTER ESTIMATE ANO SECOND QUARTER FORECAST.
Index
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.6
. The U.S. Dollars Value
i\ vveak dollar is'
pllShing up the.'" .'
price of import...;
ed materials
and equipment.
10 20 30 4010 20 30 40 10 20 30 40 10 20
2002 2003 2004
SOURCE: GLOBAL INSIGHTS. U.S. DOllAR TRADE-VlEIGHTED EXGHAtlGE RATE WITH MAJOR TRADING PARTNERS INDEX.
is the primary reason gypsum wallboard
prices showed an annual increase of
19.7% in January, says Halickman. But
those gains are coming off depressed lev-
els, she adds. "Prices fell significantly
after the industry brought on major new
capacity in 2001," Halickman explains.
Unseasonably strong housing demand
in the fourth quarter of 2004 reduced
lumber inventories to very low levels, says
Paul] annke,vice president of wood prod-
ucts for Resource Information Systems
Inc., Bedford, Mass. The resulting inven-
tory build-up led to a large jump in prices
at the end of the first quarter.
"When you break down the core in-
crease for the producer price indexes, the
real strength was in agricultural, mining
and construction equipment, which
all posted very strong increases,"
says John lvlothersole, principal at
Global Insight. "The weak dollar
has given some pricing power to
domestic producers, which face
lesser import competition and
stronger export markets."
Caterpillar Inc. is using some of
this leverage to support price hikes
SOURCE: NATIONAl ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS_ ANNUAl AVERAGE RATES FOR ADJUSTABLE RATE MORTGAGES AND COMMERCIAL BANK PRIME RATE.
32 . ENR · March 21 J 2005 enr.com
while insulation prices rose 10% during
the same period.
Last summer's regional shortages for
cement also are starting to be reflected in
BLS data. In January, the index for ready-
mix concrete waS up 11.2 %, while cement
prices showed a 9.7% annual increase.
These are historically very large hikes for
such products. "We see cement prices
increasing 2.5% in the first quarter, fol-
lowed by another 2.4% in the second
quarter," says Michele Halickman, an ana-
lyst for Global Insight Inc., Washington,
D.C. "Cement usually sees a 0.6% quar-
terly increase."
Record housing starts also have con-
tributed to the resurgence of inflation.
Strong demand from the housing market
% Interest Rates
7.0 ... Prime Rate
6.5
6.0 .. ARMs
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
2006
2002
2003
2005
2004
--", ~--: "",,---~.,...--- -- +
a
ranging from 1 to 5% that it announced
March 1 and will take effect later this Construction Materials Price Movement in 2004 -05
spring. Manufacturers typically raise
p g p y JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOY. DEC. JAN. i
prices only once a year, but the upcoming AGGREGATES htonthly __chg +0.5 +0.1 +0.2 +0.1 +0.2 +0.2 +1.5
Annual chg 3.9 +3.9 +3.8 +3.8 +3.9 +4.2 +4.7
increase will be the fourth in two years ALUMINUM SHEET Monthly %chg. 0.0 0.0 +2.9 na na na +0.7
for the Peor Ill. -based equipment com- Annual chg. +2.6 +2.6 +5.6 na na +11.2
ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURE Monthly chg. +0.4 +0.3 +0.3 +0.5 +0.3 +0.3 +1.5
pang Annual chg. +2.2 +2.1 +2.9 +3.6 +4.0 +4.3 +6.2
Cat says higher prices are the result of BRICKS Monthly chg.. 0.0 +0.2 -0.1 +0.1 -0.2 +0 .4 4 +1.6
raw material cost spikes that are cutting ���a! chg. +1.6 +2.3 +2.1 +2.3 +2.0 +2.4 +3.4 F
CEMENT Monthly %chg. +0.3 +2.1 +1.7 -0.2 +0.3 +0.2 +1.9
into profits. "Our plan is to more than Annual chg. +2.3 +4.7 +6.8 +7.0 +7.3 +7.6 +9.7
offset material cost increases with price COPPER, PIPE AND TUBE Monthly -4.0 +0.6 -1.2 +3.6 -1.1 +0.6
UB +4.8
realization in 2005," the manufacturer Annual chg. +20.5 +19.9 +18.0 +21.8 +15.6 +12.7 +10.7
DIESEL FUEL Monthly %chg. +7.7 +9.8 +4.3 +18.3 -4.1 -15.3 +4.3
said in a recent filing with the U.S. Secu- Annual tiro chg. +32.6 +39.9 +54.5 +64.7 +66.6 +37.9 +29.1 I
rides and Exchange Commission. DUCTILE IRON Monthly chg. 0 .0 +7.1 0.0 0.0 +5.4 -2.0 +3.7
Annual chg. +7.9 +15.5 +15.5 +13.7 +19.9 +17.5 +22.2
The weak U.S. dollar, coupled with FABRICATED STEEL, BLDG. Monthly chg. +0.8 +1.2 +1.2 +1.4 0.0 -0.4 +1.2
strong global demand, has exports on the Annual chg. +16.1 +17.3 +18.9 +20.6 +20.0 +18.7 +1 S
GLASS, FLAT Monthly chg. +0.2 +0.9 -0.1 -0.1 +0.9 +1.5 -1.0
rise. Last month, the Association of
Annual %chg. -3.2 -2.0 -1.7 -1.5 0.0 +1.1 0.0
I Equipment Manufacturers reported that GYPSUM PRODUCTS Monthly chg. +2.4 +2.4 +1.2 -0.4 -0.8 +0.6 +0.8
i Annual chg. +19.0 +23.3 +19.3 +19.7 +18.8 +18.7 +19.7
U.S. construction machinery exports INSULATION monthly chg. +5.4 -414 -0.2 +0.7 -1.0 -0.8 +0.2
were up 30% in 2004. The Milwaukee- Annual chg. +13.3 +13.5 +12.9 +11.8 +8.7 +9.1 +10.0 G
LUMBER SOFTWOOD Months ch -0. +6.9 --0.3 -8.6 -8.0 +0.7 +2.4
r. based trade group says exports to Aus- ij
Annual chg. +26.9 +34.7 +25.7 +18.7 +9.2 +9.6 +10.3
tralia and New Zealand grew the most, PAINT Monthly chg. +0.3 +0.2 +0.2 +0.8 +0.8 +0.1 +1.2 (t
Annual ch +2.5 +2.5 +2.9 +3.7 +4.0 +4.1 +4.9 1 1
i ncreas i ng 63 to $785 m S out h g I
PIPE PIPE FITTING Monthly chg. +0.3 +1.1 +0.1 +0.8 +1.6 -0.9 +0.5
America was in second place, with a Annual 4, chg. +24.8 +26.0 +25.5 +26.8 +29.8 +27.1 +26.6
1 60% annual gain to $1.1 billion; and Asia PLYWOOD Monthly chg. -11.1 +13.7 +2.6 -9.2 -8.0 +6.5 +0 .8 8
Annual chg. +10.0 +22.1 +7.4 -7.2 -15.6 -3.4 +7.2
ranked third, with a 3 5 increase to $1.3 READY-MIX CONCRETE Monthly chg. +0.3 +1.2 +2.1 +0.5 +1.0 +0.3 +3.4
billion. A nnual chg. 4.4 +5.4 +7.8 +8.2 +8.5 +8.9 +11.2
Construction trucks made giant leaps SHEET METAL Monthly 9, c hg. +1.3 +1.0 +0.5 =o.3 +0.7 +0. 0.
Annual chg. +12.5 +13.8 +14.0 +13.8 +14.4 +14.4 +13.2
last year as well. Total truck exports shot WIRE AND CABLE Monthly o chg. -0.1 +1.0 +0.2 +0.9 +1.0 +1.5 +0.8
up 28 according to Stephen Latin- Annual %chg. +12.8 +13.4 +13.5 +14.6 +13.8 +13.4 +12.4
Kasper, research director for the Nation SOURCE: BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, NA= NOT AVAILABLE
al Truck Equipment Association, Farm- k
ington Hills, Mich. He notes that Russia's
f.
"rapidly growing market" bought $62.5 ENR's Materials Price Index (1984 -2005)
million of U.S. -made trucks in 2004, an I
1913=100 JAN. FEB. MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. NOV. DEC.
annual increase of 137%. i
1984 1622 1628 1632 1646 1639 1626 1614 1613 1616 1606 1606 1602
Latin- Kasper also mentions China, 1985 1603 1608 1604 1610 1610 1616 1645 1637 1619 1619 1623 1611
Brazil and Australia as regions of strong 1986 1607 1609_ 1612 1621 165_4 1655 1643 1633_ 1639 1648_ 1645 1_644
export growth last year. "The weak dol- 19 1646 1638 1648 16551650 1646 1655 1665 1665 16751_664 1701
1988 1686 1686 1693 1701 1698 1699 1697 1708 1698 1688 1689 1685
lar certainly will have an effect going for 1999 1 689 1675 1676 1681 1683 1684 1691 1706 1710 1709 1708 1708
ward," he says. "These countries already 1990 1700 1707 1711 1714 1728 1743 1742 1729 1727 1723 1718 1700
like U.S. products. The weak dollar al- 1991 1701 1695 1693 1682 1686 1691 1708 1753 1735 1726 1724 1712
1992 1712 1704 _1738 1751 1774 1787 1777 1771 1768 1784 _1777 1788 r
lows them to afford more of it. 1993 1807 1806 1846 1944 2098 2092 2010 1972 1946 1952 1970 1995
Back home, many U.S. contractor 1994 2036 2093 21092120 2113 2083 2064 2055 2048 2039 2029 2029
executives report that the export mode is 1995 2031 2024 1999 _1989 1987 1996 199_3 1965 1968_ 1979 1974
I translating into more expensive imported 1996 1973 1977 1985 2000 2013 2028 2039 2062 2094 2139 2168 2 07 2
1997 2206 2207 2189 2254 2262 2293 2269 2238 2225 2207 2166 2195
mac$inery and tools. "It hurts the com- 1 998 2185 2186 2177 2189 2187 2178 2169 2172 2192 2177 2174 2165
petition in the North American market," 1999 2173 2161 2151 2158 _2156 2157 2184 2208 2230 2228 2211 2192
says Thad Pirtle, vice president of equip- 2000 2197 2224 2228 2225 2241 2219 2198 2191 2177 2163 2151 2127
2001 2122 2108 2116 2104 2105 2120 2189 2152 2097 2097 2088 2056
ment management for Traylor Bros. Inc., 2002 2045 2045 2062 2039 2063 2070 2070 2049 2044 2029 2016 1992
Evansville, Ind. European -made machines 2003 1987 1981 196_1 1960 1970 _1961 1954 1976 1974 2003 203_1 2011
are costing 10 to 20% more than in re- 2004 200_8 2056 2_139_2219 2295 2345 2361 2376 2431 2452 2448 2420
2005 2402 2399 2417
cent years, he notes. a
enr.com March 21, 2005 ENR 33
Allentown/Foster Point
Water/Sewer/Surface Water Improvement Project
Water Sewer SSWM Total
29 ok 55 ok 16% 100%
Low Bid 3/17/05 $ 1,856,445.44 $ 3,520,844.80 $ 1,024,245.76 $ 6,401,536.00
100/0 Contingency 185,644.54 352,084.48 102,424.58 640,153.60
Total $ 2,042,089.98 $ 3,872,929.28 $ 1,126,670.34 $ 7,041,689.60
CE in house, this is only
assistance and testing 72,500.00 137,500.00 40,000.00 250,000.00
$ 2,114,589.98 $ 4,010,429.28 $ 1,166,670.34 $ 7,291,689.60
Add 2004 Expended 53,348.00 192,544.00 8,895.00 254,787.00
Total $ 2,167,937.98 $ 4,202,973.28 $ 1,175,565.34 $ 7,546,476.60
City Revenue 87,000.00 165,000.00 48,000.00 300,000.00
PWfF Loan 1,653,000.00 3,135,000.00 912,000.00 5,700,000.00
$ 1,740,000.00 $ 3,300,000.00 $ 960,000.00 $ 6,000,000.00
Total Shortfall $ (427,937.98) $ (902,973.28) $ (215,565.34) $ (1,546,476.60)
2005 Budget $ 1,687,000.00 $ 3,107,213.00 $ 951,000.00 $ 5,745,213.00
Bid & CE 2,114,589.98 4,010,429.28 1,166,670.34 7,291,689.60
Difference $ 427,589.98 $ 903,216.28 $ 215,670.34 $ 1,546,476.60
Current CIP 2,966,000.00 3,575,000.00 7,057,000.00
New CIP $ 3,393,589.98 $ 4,478,216.28 $ 7,272,670.34
Increase 2005 CIP to: 3,393 4,477 7,272
ATTACHMENT E
City of Tukwila
000
$10, fee
GtioJ'l
GDI'I116
SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
2005-2010 Analysis in OOO's
REVENUES 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Totals
Monthly Sewer Charges (1)
King County Metro Sewer 2,640 2,640 2,680 2,750 ' 2,750 2,775 16,235
Regular City Sewer 1,000 1,165 1,195 1,363 1,383 1,546 7,652
Other Misc. Revenue (2) 125 '130 130 135 140 145 805
Public Works Trust Fund (3) 2,508 0 0 0 0 0 2,508
Bond Proceeds (4) 0 0 0 0 0 3,500 3,500
. .
Sewer Connection Fees (5) 50 70 ":100 .\ ...1qO.. . 150 150 670
__0 __ ..
Beginning Working Capital 2,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,000
Total Revenues 8,323 4,005 4,105 4,398 4,423 8,116 33,370
EXPENDITURES I
Sewer Operations & Maintenance
King County Metro Sewer (6) 2,648 2,648 2,688 2,775 2,775 2,785 16,319
Regular City Sewer (7) 881 921 962 1,005 1,050 1,097 5,916
Debt Service (8) 36 150 250 250 250 250 1,186
Subtotal 3,565 3,719 3,900 4,030 4,075 4,132 23,421
Sewer Capital- CIP Program(9) . : 4;477 670 270 555 355 3,650 9,977
Total Expenditures 8,042 4,389 4,170 4,585 4,430 7,782 33,398
Cash Flow Year by Year 281 (384) (65) (187) (7) 334 (28)
Accumulated Totals 281 (103) (168) (355) (362) (28)
XIV
3/3112005
ATTACHMENT E
City of Tukwila
000
$1Jf fee
Gti 0 1'1
,ol'll'le
SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
2005-2010 Analysis in ODD's
REVENUES 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Totals
Monthly Sewer Charges (1)
King County Metro Sewer 2,640 2,640 2,680 2,750 2,750 2,775 16,235
Regular City Sewer 1,000 1,165 1,195 1,363 1,383 1,546 7,652
Other Misc. Revenue (2) 125 ; 130 130 135 140 145 805
Public Works Trust Fund (3) 2,508 0 0 0 0 0 2,508
Bond Proceeds (4) 0 0 0 0 0 3,500 3,500
..
Sewer Connection Fees (5) 50 .84. ....A20.. :180 . 180 . 180 ......7~4
Beginning Working Capital 2,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,000
Total Revenues 8,323 4,019 4,125 4,428 4,453 8,146 33,494
EXPENDITURES I
Sewer Operations & Maintenance
King County Metro Sewer (6) 2,648 2,648 2,688 2,775 2,775 2,785 16,319
Regular City Sewer (7) 881 921 962 1,005 1,050 1,097 5,916
Debt Service (8) 36 150 250 250 250 250 1,186
Subtotal 3,565 3,719 3,900 4,030 4,075 4,132 23,421
Sewer Capital - CI P Program(9) . 4;477 670 270 555 355 3,650 9,977
Total Expenditures 8,042 4,389 4,170 4,585 4,430 7,782 33,398
Cash Flow Year by Year 281 (370) (45) (157) 23 364 96
Accumulated Totals 281 (89) (134 ) (291 ) (2G8) 96
XIV
3/3112005
11110"
19 .... 1-0""
f'~'
ATTACHMENT E
City of Tukwila
000
$1S, fee
.1011
.."C;1-
'0"."
SEWER ENTERPRISE FUND
2005-2010 Analysis in OOO's
REVENUES 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Totals
Monthly Sewer Charges (1)
King County Metro Sewer 2,640 2,640 2,680 2,750 2,750 2,775 16,235
Regular City Sewer 1,000 \,165 1,195 1,363 1,383 1,546 7,652
Other Misc. Revenue (2) 125 130 130 135 140 145 805
Public Works Trust Fund (3) _2,508 0 0 0 0 0 2,508
Hond Proceeds (4) 0 0 0 0 0 3,500 3,500
Sewer Connection Fees (5) 50 105 150 225 225 225 980
Beginning Working Capital 2,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,000
Total Revenues 8,323 4,040 4,155 4,473 4,498 8,191 33,680
EXPENDITURES I
Sewer Operations & Maintenance
King County Metro Sewer (6) 2,648 2,648 2,688 2,775 2,775 2,785 16,319
Regular City Sewer (7) 881 921 962 1,005 1,050 1,097 5,916
Debt Service (8) 36 150 305 305 305 305 1 ,406
Subtotal 3,565 3,719 3,955 4,085 4,130 4,187 23,641
Sewer Capital - CI P Program(9) 4,4 77 670 270 555 355 3,650 9,977
Total Expenditures 8,042 4,389 4,225 4,640 4,485 7,837 33,618
Cash Flow Year by Year 281 (349) (70) ( 167) 13 354 62
Accumulated Totals 281 (68) (138) (305) (292) 62
XIV
4/6/2005
ATTACHMENT D
City of Tukwila
WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
'2005-2010 Analysis in ODD's
REVENUES 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Totals
Monthly Water Charges (1) 3,975 4,000 4,100 4,100 4,150 4,150 24,475
Other Miscellaneous Revenue (2) 154 160 165 165 170 170 984
Public Works Trust Fund (3) 1,322 0 0 0 0 0 1,322
Mitigation 0 ; 215 75 0 0 0 290
Water Connection Fees (4) 20 30 30 100 100 100 380
Beginning Working Capital 4,990 0 0 0 0 0 4,990
Total Revenues 10,461 4,405 4,370 4,365 4,420 4,420 32,441
EXPENDITURES I
Water Operations & Maintenance(5) 2,889 2,976 3,065 3,156 3,200 3,250 18,536
Debt Service (6) 709 740 487 495 500 500 3,431
Subtotal 3,598 3,716 3,552 3,651 3,700 3,750 21,967
Water Capital - CIP Program (7) .H ..3,$9$. 450 1,659 1,400 698 95 7,695
Total Expenditures 6,991 4,166 5,211 5,051 4,398 3,845 29,662
Cash Flow Year by Year 3,4 70 239 (841 ) (686) 22 575 2,779
Accumulated Totals 3,470 3,709 2,868 2,182 2,204 2,779
XII
3/3112005
ATTACHMENT F
City of Tukwila
SURFACE WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
2005-2010 Analysis in OOO's
REVENUES 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Total
Annual Billings (Current) (1) 1,820 2,184 2,200 2,550 2,575 3,100 14,429
Other Revenues (2) 108 70 70 75 75 75 473
Public Works Trust Fund (PWTF) (3) 3,902 210 0 0 0 0 4,112
Sale of Surplus Property (4) 670 0 0 0 0 0 670
Transfer from 103 & 104 Funds (5) 720 1,280 0 0 0 0 2,000
Beginning Working Capital 3,006 0 0 0 0 0 3,006
Total Revenues 10,226 3,744 2,270 2,625 2,650 3,175 24,690
EXPENDITURES I
Operations & Maintenance (6) 1,041 1,082 1,125 1,170 1,217 1,265 6,900
Debt Service (7) 114 250 370 380 380 380 1,874
Engineering Labor (8) 0 0 90 90 95 100 375
Subtotal 1,155 1,332 1,585 1,640 1,692 1,745 9,149
SSWM Capital - CIP Program (9) '7/2,72 . 2,196 1,257 1,134 1,617 690 14,166
Total Expenditures 8,427 3,528 2,842 2,774 3,309 2,435 23,315
Cash Flow Year by Year 1,799 216 (572) (149) (659) 740 1,375
.
Accumulated Totals 1 ,799 2,015 1,443 1,294 635 1,375
XVI
313112005
-
MaP Legend
.. p.llantownIFo.ta, Pt. poe.a 2
@ NoO_sewered Area
A\\eotoWOlfoster poiot
sewer \t't\provet't\eots
Phase 2
--
~
NOi iO SCp.\.E
~
SKyWAY
,
,,,"I. "UE
"
\
~.
,..
I
I
.....-.-
RENTON
oate: Mr\1 2005
DiSclaimer. ihe loCauoo ot teature: aod
~ouodar\es are apprOXImate and
are ioteoded tor retereoce ooW.
KENT
.
\
=------ -------
pES
MOINeS
Allentown and Foster Point Improvement Phase 2 Vicinity Map
FT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, REJECTING ALL BIDS
SUBMITTED FOR THE ALLENTOWN/FOSTER POINT
WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
RESOLUTION NO.
WHEREAS, sealed bids were solicited for the Allentown/Foster Point Water and
Sewer Improvements Project; and .,
WHEREAS, bi~s wer~ opened and read aloud by the City Clerk on March 17, 2005;
and
WHEREAS, a budget was set for the construction of the water and sewer
improvements, and
WHEREAS, all responsive bids were over the budgeted amount for the construction of
the Allentown/Foster Point Water and Sewer Improvements Project;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
All bids are hereby rejected due to budget limitations.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of . 2005.
Pam Linder, Council President
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Office of the City Attorney
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
Filed with the City Clerk:
~
Passed by the City Council:
Resolution Number:
(P:Projects\A- SW Projects\OlSW02\Resolution 2005 Rejecting Allentown Foster Point Bids)
Utilities Committee
April 5, 2005
Present: Dave Fenton, Chair; Joan Hernandez, Jim Haggerton
Frank Iriarte, Mike Cusick, Bob Giberson, Pat Brodin, Gail Labanara, Lucy
Lauterbach; citizens Eric Rinehart and Todd Heistuman
....*1. Allento\vn/ Foster Point 'Vater and Sewer Proiect Bids The committee learned more
about the bids that came in for the Allentown and Foster Point water/sewer upgrade project last
month. :NUke explained staff had carefully re-calculated cost of items that those \vho bid in
October had said raised the cost of the project. vVhen sidewalks and imported fill requirements
were removed staff hoped bids in March would be lower. Only three bids were received on this
re-bid, and all three were at least $1.5 million over the engineer's estimate. :NIike had talked to
the contractors after this bid and discovered that the cost of ductile pipe had been raised $4.00
per foot, and with over 10,000 feet needed those cost increases add $40,000. PVC pipe has also
risen 200,.10, and steel is 18.5% .b-igher than last year. Diesel fuel increases of $.60 per gallon also
increased hids.
Staff explained the options available to the city. The first option was to postpone the project,
apply for more Public Works Trust Funds (PWTF) and re-bid it in 2006. Staffhas determined
that on the second option the PWTF board will not allow the city to split the project up and keep
the loan we have. Splitting the project into many phases would increase the cost, yet we would
still need to borro\v more money. Finally, on the fourth option there are not sufficient city funds
to cover the shortfall. The first option seemed most viable to the committee members.
Committee members asked about the funds needed to complete the project. Mike estimated it
would cost $3.3 million above the $5.7 million we've already bOITo\ved. Poverty Hill will be
removed from the proj ect. The committee members \vere concerned about the cost, but expressed
interest in funding a total project including sidewalks and other citizen amenities removed
previously. They thought the project should be done as a full city project. Jim H noted that even
if current residents say they don't want sidewalks, future homeowners there might benefit from
sidewalks, and could miss them if they were not built.
Todd said city zoning of 6,500-foot lots has encouraged very dense development, and that there
will be many more people living in Foster Point and Allentown in the future. He supported
putting in sidewalks. Also, as developers in Foster Point they have planned for side\valks by
donating easements, cutting trees, and moving poles to accommodate sidewalks.
Mike said if the city asks P\VTF for more funds the first of May, the city \vill hear in October.
The funds would come in Mayor June 2006, with construction starting in spring, 2006. Gail will
calculate connection fees and compare them to our neighbors, but she said the sewer fund
couldn't afford to subsidize anyone. She will need to calculate the increase, but a first look
sho\ved a $15,000 connection fee. The same rules that governed previous sewer construction
prQjects will also apply to this improvement. No one will be forced to connect unless they sell
their home, add bedrooms or other large improvements to their house, or build a new home.
Recommend issue to Co,v.
.,/ .-//
/~/
//" / -- ---
L/~ C . h . 1
c' " ommlttee C air approva
wIinutes by L. Lauterbach