The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOW 2004-11-22 Item 4E - Budget - Grant Funds for Tukwila International Boulevard Phase II and III COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials ITEM NO. .r; P 1 �,t�� j Meeting Date 1, Prepared by I Mayor's review 1 Council review 1 a 11/22/04 RT I rso$ I I I I ITEM INFORMATION CAS NUMBER: 04-012 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 2/2/04 AGENDA ITEM TITLE Tukwila International Blvd Phase 2 3 Scope and Budget Alternatives CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 11122/04 SPONSOR Council El Mayor Adm Svcs DCD El Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PTV SPONSOR'S The City has received additional federal grant funds and working with WSDOT to receive SUMMARY state funds from the "nickel package The new scope of work with these funds include undergrounding, illumination and sidewalks. Question is to design the roadway with full 10' sidewalks (6' concrete 4' planter) for the length of the project or reduce to 8' sidewalk sections with no planters where necessary. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte El F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte El Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 11/8/04 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Provide direction on desired scope of project CommirrEE Recommend 8' sections forward to COW for discussion COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED CITY FUNDS REQUIRED $16.15 million $16.2 million $2,430,000 Fund Source: 104.02 Commercial Streets (page 44 45, 2005 CIP) Comments: City Funds also includes $225, 000 from 412 Surface Water for the High Flow Bypass (pg 125 Prpsd 2005 CIP) MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION Complete roadway from S 138 St north to Sabey development Budget restrictions limited scope to not include undergrounding 11/22/04 1 MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS 11/22/04 Information Memo dated November 3, 2004 Spreadsheets on Scope and Budget Alternatives Transportation Committee Meeting Minutes from November 8, 2004 . INFORMATION MEMO To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor Mullet Public Works Director N ovemberJ, 2004 TukwilaInternational Blvd - Phases 2 & 3 (S 116 tb St toS 138tb St) Scope, and Budget Alternatives Project No. 95..RW03 ISSUE Present scope' alternatives based on updated funding and ,potential funding, from WSDOT. BACKGROUND This project was presented to the Transportation Committee in February 2003 where project limits were discussed. Thereslllting consensus was the preference to camplete roadway improvements from the ,north limit of Phase 1 (S 13Stb St) to' as far north as possible with the available funding (just north of the Sabeydevelapment). This would eliminate having a "gap" in, improvements where" Phase' 3 is currently identified. In January 2004, scope and budget alternatives were presented to the City Council for discussion regarding the available budget (at that time) campared with the estimated canstruction costs. far three different alternatives (see attached spreadsheet). The Council provided directionontheir preferred scope items. Staff has since prepared 30% design plans that have been reviewed by .a Value, Engineering team. The, City ,has subsequently applied for and received additianal federal grant funds for constructian of the praject. Staff is also warking with WSDOT to transfer state funds to the City's project from a "Nickel Package"praject that is identified within the City's project limits . KPO, Inc., is under contract with the City to design Phase 2 of T .I.B. improvements. They have developed revised scope and budget alternatives far the project limits fram S 13Stb St to S 116tb 8t based on the currently anticipated funding scenario. The estimated casts with descriptions of included and excluded scope items are shown in an attached spreadsheet. ANALYSIS All alternatives are based on the same project limits from S 13Stb St to S 116tb St. The new scopes and estimated costs are based on: 1) the original information developed within the design report including the scope items desired from input by the City Council and 2) the current secured funding and the anticipated state funds. The description shown for each funding alternative identifies both 'included and excluded scope items for that particular alternative. Mayor Muliet Page 2 November 3, 2004 RECOMMENDATION Discuss the alternatives presented and provide direction to staff on desired scope items in order to proceed with final design of improvements. Funding Source Preliminary Engineering. State Transportation Improvem.entBoard Federal Hwy TEA-21.Grant State DOT Funds Construction State Transportation Impr()vement Board Federal Hwy TEA-21 Grant State "Nickel Package" Funds TukwilaCityRevenue{104&412 Funds) Total Total $ 660,000.00 440,000.00 400,000.00 $1,500,000.00 $4,200,000.00 6,681,008.00 2,900,000.00 2,430,000.00 $16,211,008.00 attachments:SCQpe and Budget Alternatives (from November 2004) Scope and Budget Alternatives (from January 2004) (P:ProjeclS\A- RW & RS ProjeclS\9SRW03 TIB2\Memo phase 2 AIlS - Round 2) New $400,000 New $2,995,020 New $2,900,000 Tukwila International Boulevard Phase II and III Phase 2 and 3 South 139th Street to South 116th Street Scope and Budget Alternatives November 2004 Tukwila International Boulevard Phase II and III Phase 2 and 3 South 139th Street to South 116th Street Scope and Budget Alternatives December 12, 2003 " Transportation Committee November 8, 2004 Present: JoanlIernandez, Chair; Pam Carter, Joe Duffie Pat Brodin, Robin Tischmak, Jim Morrow, Kevin Fuhrer, Alan Doerschel, Frank Iriarte, Gail Labanara, Lucy Lauterbach 1. Interurban Avenue South Design Thecityhas received a $396,000 federal grant for funding the design of road improvements on Intemrban Avenue S. from 143rd to Fort Dent "Vay. After interviewing five of the fourteen firms that were interested, staff chose KPG by a wide margin. They scored higher than other companies on every rating criterion. The design and engineering costs of $434,710.24 are within the, project budget, although Joan noticed that in the CIP there is not money for constmctionuntil after 2010. She asked if the design work being done now would still be useful if construction didn't occur until that many years ahead, and Jim assured her it wQuld;The Comrpitteeapproved the scope of work that was included.. Authorize mayor to si2'llcontract with KPG for design services for Interurban. 2. SouthcenterParkwav Extension Supplement David Evans already has a $35l ,000 contract to design the extension of South center Parkway to the south city limits. Additional design work is needed for thesewerline from Minkler to S. 200th and the additional 1,400 feet of roadway to reach the city'ssouthernboundary,soa supplement to the contract has been prepared. Segale did some preliminary designwork on the sewer, but the majority of design still remains to be done. A supplement has beennegotiated in the amount of $70,615, and is within budget. Advertising for construction is included in the work. Jim said the City cannot afford to build the road or sewer withoutbonds;iand we couldn't pay the bond payments with()ut assistance from the TVS project. Pam pointed outthat the only reason forthe sewer project is to serve the TVS project. The seWer money is within the S. 180th Street project in the CIP. Recommend authorizin!! mavortosi2'n sUODlement for extension. .~ 3. TukwilalnternationalBoulevard (TIB) Phases 2 and 3 of the TIB project were previously discussed in late 200Jandearly 2004, but there was not enough money to do both phases, so the southern section thatwould continue the previous improvements north, had been chosen. Since the first oftheyeartheCjtyhas received more funding, and is now able to do both phases, if some savings are found. The Committee considered the$16.5m and $16.15m versions and recommended the $16.15 million dollar version, and also considered other savings that could be made if necessary. Move discussion to CO\V, 4. Cascade View Park Cascade View Community,Park constmction is complete, and the city is ready to release theretainage of the contractor. Though the contract was largely done in 2003, there were a number of landscape issues that have remained open. Those are now resolved, and the.proj~ct can be closedouLJoan asked what the $8,571.20 cost overruns were for and ....vas informed they were partly for gravel, asphalt and the sidewalk extension. Recommend Droiect accentance and release of retainage to consent agenda of a Regular Meeting. .~::-