HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2004-11-22 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET
Monday, November 22, 2004; 7 PM
11. CALL TO ORDER IPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CITIZEN At this time, you are.invitedto comment on items not included on this agenda. To
COMMENT comment on an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is
presented for discussion.
Proposed 2005 Budgetand Financial Planning Model.
3. PUBLIC
HEARING
4. SPECIAL
ISSUES
Tukwila City Council Agenda
StevenM. Mullet,Mayor
Rhonda Berry, CityAdministrator
Jim Haggerton, Council President
Councilmembers: · Pam Carter · Joe Duffie
· Dave Fenton · Joan Hernandez
· Pamela Linder · Dennis Robertson
.:. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE .:.
Tukwila City Hall; Council Chambers
I'g.5
a. A resolution updating and clarifying the non-represented employees'
compensation, and adopting the non-represented salary schedule and benefits
summary effective January 1, 2005.
b. Appoint a representative and an alternate to the Metropolitan Solid Waste
Management Advisory Committee.
c. 2005 property tax ordinances:
(1) An ordinance levying the general taxes for the City of Tukwila for the fiscal
year commencing January 1, 2005.
(2) An ordinance increasing theregular levy from the previous year, commencing
January 1, 2005, onall property, both real and personal.
d. Conceptual Code Amendment to allow Mixed Use Residential development
within the designated Transit Oriented Development Area.
Pg.9
Pg.19
Pg.41
Pg.51
e. Tukwila International Boulevard Phase 2 & 3 scope and budget alternatives.
Pg.63 I
Pg.71
;::~~~
f. Interurban Avenue South Consultant's Agreement with KPG, Inc.
g. Southcenter Parkway Extension Consultant's Supplement.
h; Continued review of Proposed 2005 Budget.
)> Please brinK your2005 Proposed BudKet. <
- 5. REPORTS a. Mayor c. Staff , e. Intergovernmental
b. City Council d. City Attorney
6. MISCELLANEOUS
. 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION
8. ADJOURN TO SPECIAL MEETING
I
.:. SPECIAL MEETING .:.
I~
· Ord #2069
· Res #1567
Monday, November 22,2004
1. CALL TO ORDER I ROLL CALL
-
-~~~---...
i
.......,~'.-...............~
.:..,.,_r_"::..':~.~_.w~'",, """-~'~.;J;;l~~"- .~,~< ............,................."h"- ""_"''''''''::",:_ _~~
j SPECIAL MEETING (Continued)
: Monday, November 22,2004
i Page 2
j
J 2.
CONSENT
AGENDA
; 3. UNFINISHED
BUSINESS
I
i
I
,I
:1
I
114.
'\
ADTOURNMENT
,-
a. Approval of Minutes: 11/15/04 (Regular).
b. Approval of Vouchers.
c. Approve the appointment of Frank lriarte, Public Works Deputy Director, as the
City's representative to the Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Advisory
Committee, and Jim Morrow, Public Works Director, as alternate (see item 4b
above).
a. A resolution updating and clarifying the non-represented employees'
compensation, and adopting the non-represented salary schedule and benefits
summary effective January I, 2005 (see item 4a above).
b. An ordinance amending zoning on the zoning map from LDR to MIC/L at the Pg.131
property located at the western terminus of South 126th Street and between
Tukwila International Boulevard and 34th Avenue South.
c. An ordinance amending the City's Comprehensive Plan in compliance with the
requirements of the Growth Management Act.
d. An ordinance amending TMC Chapter 18.80, "Amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations."
)> Please bring your ordinance notebook. '~
e. 2005 property tax ordinances (see item 4c above):
(1) An ordinance levying the general taxes for the City of Tukwila for the fiscal
year commencing January 1, 2005 (see item 4c(1) above).
(2) An ordinance increasing the regular levy from the previous year,
commencing January I, 2005, on all property, both real and personal (see
. item4c(2) above).
f. Authorize Mayor to sign a contract with KPG, Inc. in the amount of $434/)71..00
for the provision of engineering design services for roadway improvements on
Interurban Avenue South from South 143rd Street to Fort Dent Way (see item 4f
above).
g. Authorize Mayor to sign Contract Supplement #1 with David Evans &
Associates, Inc., in the amount of $79,615.00 for additional roadway design and
sanitary sewer plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) for the Southcenter
Parkway Extension project (see item 4g above).
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
II
Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible.
Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice by calling the
CityClerk's office206-433-1800/TDD 206-248-2933. This notice is available at www.ci.Tukwila.wa.us.
and also in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities.
, Tukwila Council meetings are audio taped.
- jl
j
J
j
!
1
L
1
. ~--:. '~.-~~-...:.:::, ~'.;~-:"-':'::-:
."'... .,.,
,"__~_J
. ._--.-_...---._...--..
_.~..._. ,.....,....__._~.."-,-.:....~..~. _.....~ ~.-
........".""
N►LA COUNCIL A GENDA SYNOPSIS
9sZ!, Initials ITEM No.
'AO 1 21'!: 1 Pre pared 1
1 i 0 1 Meeting Date by 1 Mayor's review Council review
cn I e.`A 2 1 11 -22 -04 1 B. Baker
7908
I I I I 3
CAS NUMBER: 04-162 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 2004
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Public Hearing to consider the proposed 2005 budget
Public
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Hearing El Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 11 22 04 Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor Human Services
Adm DCD Finance Fire Legal PAR Police PW
Svcs
SPONSOR'S
SUMMARY
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
El Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE:
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Hold a public hearing on the proposed budget to consider written and /or
(O
C N S /0DM TNT oral comments and ask questions ding the 2 n 5 budget.
.,P.,.1.,OR, 1,,..�JIu.. co t
�u�ut..��w ui�u uon questions rcyarwiiy t��c proposed uuuyC1..
COMMITTEE Same as sponsor.
IM AC FUND SOUR
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source:
Comments: Budget Summary for funds 000,100, 200, 300, 400, 500 600, equals $118,066,166.00
11-22-04
i At'TACHUIENTS
C t s
11 -22 -04 Copy of Notice of Public Hearing
c../.....-t........ ....~ 'l''''':''lk .z
<.t>yO) ... u" Wt. a
NO'l'ICEOF.PUHLIC HEARlNG
Notice is herebygiventhat the Tukwila City Council will hold a Public Hearing on
Mondav. November22. 2004. beginning at 7 V.m. in the Council Chambers at Tukwila
- - - -
City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, Washington, to consider the following:
THE PROPOSED 2005 BUDGET
. BudgetSummal"Y:
000 ................General Fund .................... $41,923,000
100 ...............special Revenue .................20,923,000
200...~.._.. ........ Deb t S eryice .............. ....... ..... 2,981,000
300 .........~..... Capital Proj ects..................... 8,913,000
400 ...............Enterprise ... ......................... 32,326,166
500 ...............Intemal Service..................... 9,645,000
600 ...............Trust and Agency............... 1.355.000
TOTAL ALL FUNDS....... $118,066,166
L
'i
,-
Copies of the proposed budget may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk
during normal business hours. Citizens are invited to provide written and oral comments
and ask questions concerning the budget. Those unable to attend the meeting in person
may submit written testimony to the City Clerk's office until 5 p.m. on Monday,
November 22,2004.
The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate people with disabilities. Please contact
the City Clerk's office by noon on Monday, November 22, if we can be of assistance (206-
433-1800 OR TDD 1-206-24~933).
Dated this j( I?8tYOf .~
,2004.
City of Tukwila
~. CAf~~~
J ailE: Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
Date of Publication: Seattle Times, November 5 and 12, 2004
_.~-'
w COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Of J �s2 Initials ITEM NO.
1 4) 14 1 Meeting Date Prepared by 1 Mayor's review I Council review 1
,fl 2 11 22 04 V. Jessop ,1 /iii /f 1
1908 �1 I
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 04-163 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 2004
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Proposed resolution updating and clarifying non represented employees' compensation
and adopting a salary schedule (with COLA) and benefits summary.
CATEGORY 111 Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award 1:1 Public Other
Hearing
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 11 -22 -04 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Council Mayor Human Services
Adm DCD Finance Fire Legal PAR Police PW
Svcs
SPONSOR'S With past Council direction, City staff has reviewed the Seattle- Tacoma Bremerton Semi
SUMMARY Annual Average of the Consumper Price Index. In odd numbered years, City staff members
are to receive 90% of the aforementioned CPL For 2005, such figures have been calculated
and are now proposed for implementation.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte 11 -15 -04 Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE:
RECOMMENDATIONS
Review and approve proposed resolution at the November 22, 2004 COW
meeting; and for action, consider the proposed resolution at the Special
SPONSOR /ADMIN. meeting g t1'
111VV 4111 on the Jalllt. evening.
COMMITTEE Same as sponsor.
I s I' /FUN SO l EI
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source: 2005 General Fund
Comments:
G
11-22-04 I
h as �s' 'e V
11 -22 -04 Memorandum dated 11 -17 -04
Proposed draft resolution
I Minutes Finance Safety Committee meeting November 15, 2004.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor Mullet & City Council
FROM:
VikiJessop, Administrative Services Director
DA TE:
Novembe(17,' 2004
RE:
Non-Represented Wage/Benefit Schedule for 2005
In December2003,Council approved a resolution providing for a cost
of living adjustment (COLA) for non-represented employees on odd-
numbered. calendar ',. years. The resolution provided a start date of
January 1, 2005.
When<discussing the COLA, Council agreed it would be based upon
the Consumer Price Index (CPI) Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton Area
Semi-Annual, Average (first half of calendar year to first half of
fo II owi ng calendar year.
The CIPaverage fortheabove-stated period is .740/0; and 900/0 of the
CIPwou!d providea.660/0 wage increase. The external market for
non-represented employees is approximately 20/0 and 'internal
bar'" n ....'" "n'+ e-....loyee.... h~'!.-.: h"''"''...... "'''''''''''''';'v';'''g :......"'..........,....--- _.&
' ~ai.i,.~u .;L iiitJl ","'. aye IJCCII ICvCI II IIlvICCI;:'C;:' UI
approximately 2.50/0.
Inorderto avoid further salary compression and in anticipation of the
impacts to the wage schedule when the market analysis is done in
the summer of 2005, the City Council has made a determination that
the wage increase for non-represented employees for calendar year
2005 shall be .660/0 COLA (90% of the CIP), and a 1.340/0 general
wage adjustment, fora total wage scheduie increase of 20/0.
> '.',-. - ,-_,_,
'.
n,! D) f~
l! JJ L~
"2 CJ
r
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 1537, UPDATING AND
CLARIFYING THE NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION
AND ADOPTING THE NON-REPRESENTED SALARY SCHEDULE AND
BENEFiTS SUMMARY EFFECTiVE JANUARY 1,2005.
WHEREAS, ,the Tukwila City Council approved Resolution No. 1537, dated
December 1, 2003, which provided that starting on January 1, 2005, a COLA would be
provided to non-represented employees on odd-numbered calendar years; and
WHEREAS, the COLA would be based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) Seattle-
Tacoma-BremertonArea Semi-Annual Average (first half of calendar year to first half of
following calendar year); and
WHEREAS, the CPlaverage for the above-stated period oftime is .74%; and
WHEREAS, 90% of the CPI would provide for a .66% wage increase; and
WHEREAS, the external market for non-represented employees as a whole in
comparable jurisdictions is approximately 2% and internal bargaining unit employees
have been receiving increases of approximately 2.5%; and
WHEREAS, in order to avoid further salary compression and in anticipation of the
impacts to the wage schedule when the market analysis is done in the summer of 2005,
the City Council has made a determination that the wage increase for non-represented
employees for calendar year 2005 shall be .66% COLA (90% of the CPI) and a 1.34%
general wage adjustment, for a total wage schedule increase of 2%;
NOW, THEREFORE" THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The following statements are established for the purpose of adopting
,the non-represented employees' wages for 2005 and consideration for future years.
1. The following basic plan elements remain the same:
a. Decision Band Methodology for creating classifications.
b. Market analysis using comparable jurisdictions' top step wages.
c. Regression line analysis to establish the Control Point for each DBM rating
with a range of 12.5% and 30% used to establish the steps.
d. Steps below the Control Point are automatic as individL!a!s mo'!e thrOL!gh
the system.
e. A market adjustment may be applied to a position when the wage survey
results establish a new control point which is ten percent (10%) or more below the
market; and internal compression exists within the career ladder or where there is
difficultyin recruiting and/or retaining qualified employees. The integrity of the Decision
Band Method (DBfVI) is maintained, while recognizing a wage gap based on market
conditions for a specific position. The market adjustment shall be calculated by taking
the difference between the newly-established control point and the market average
Non-rep salary 1l.04.doc
wage for the, position, and applying it on top of the established salary range for tile
positions. This market adjustment shall be reviewed every two years as part of tile
salary study and may be eliminated or changed based on the results of the survey.
2. The current wage plan includes a COLA for tho~,e employees that remain
above the newly ,established control point, based on 90% of the Seattle-Tacoma-
Bremerton Area Semi-Annual Average (first half of 2003 to first half of 2004, which is
.74% plus 1.34%, for a total of 2%) for calendar year 2005. All employees who remc.in
above the. control point will receive a COLA increase, which is calculated on the salcry
, schedule's control point.
3. "The current wage plan provides a minimum increase of 2% to those employei3s
who were previously above the control point, and are now placed onto the new salcry
schedule.
4. A COLA shall be applied each January 1 during odd--numbered years based on
the Seattle-Tacoma..Bremerton Area Semi-Annual Average (first half of calendar year to
first half of following calendar year). .
5., The City shall conduct an in-house market analysis of the non-representBd
compensation system during the summer of odd-numbered years. The results of the
analysis will be implemented on January 1 of the following eVI~n-numbered year.
G.The, Decision Band method of job evaluation will be used to establish the
relative internal value and relationship of all non-represented jobs within the City of
Tukwila.
7.", Merit will continue to be eliminated from the plan at this time due to economic
conditions as well as' a desire that the wage schedule for non-represented employees
better reflect the wages offered by those jurisdictions determined to be comparable, and
may be reconsidered as a plan element in subsequent years.
8. Step increases from the minimum to the control point for all positions shall be
annually on the employee's performance review date. Thew will be no step increases
during 2005 for any employee at or above the control point.
Section 2. Non-represented salary schedule and benefits summary.
A. The non-represented salary schedule, attachment "N hereto, shall be
approved, effective January 1,2005.
B. The non-represented benefits summary. attachm3nt "B" hereto, shall be
approved, effective January 1 , 2005.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUI<WILA, WASHINGTON, at
a Special Meeting thereof this day of
2004.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
Jim Haggerton, Council President
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Filed with the City Clerk: /
Passed by the City Council:_1
Resolution Number:
I
/_-
Office of the City Attorney
Non-rep salary ll-O+.doc
-:-::
C~TY OF TUK\lViLA
NON..REPRESENTED SALARY SCHEDULE -- 2005
-------
Classification Title
Administrative Support Technician
Office Technician
Office Specialist
Administrative Assistant
--
"--~-~-
Program Coordinator
Management Coordinator
Management Analyst
Program Administrator
Program Manager
Administrative Manager
r
-oepartm.entMa~'--r
Department AdministratJr 1-
Assistant Director
Department Head
Department Director
City Administrator
----~~--
Non-repsalary 11-04.doc
I
Job Title
Administrative Support Technician
Personnel Technician
I
L
Administrative Secretary
Civ. Svc....S,ecretary/Exam.
Deputy City Clerk
Executive Secretary
Legal Assistant
Systems Administrator
Personnel Assistant
City Clerk
Court Administrator
Police Records Manager
Legislative Analyst
Personnel Analyst
Public Works Analyst
Safety & Risk Analyst
Internal Ooerations Mar. ---'-=--'--1
___ Public WorkS; Coord~a-tor___~l
Asst. City Administrator
Police Lieutenant
Senior Engineer
BuildinQ Official
Asst. Parks & Rec. Dir.
Maint. Operations Mgr.
Planning Mgr.
Police_Captain
Deputy Community Dev. Director
Deputv Public Works Director
Asst. Fire Chief
City Engineer
Economic Development Administrator
Admin. Services Director
DCD Director
Finance Director
Parks & Rec. Director
Fire Chief
Police Chief
PW Director
City Administrator
I
I
1
Rang~'
A12 J
I
I
821
B22
-~-~
!
B23
I
l--(;41-------1
. . C42 !
I,
il
I
I
--061-\
I
J
l
I
C43
D62
063
D72
E81
E83
E91
F102
,.
Attachment A-1
2005. Salary Structure (Monthly)
DBM (Minimum)
Rating Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7
1 A11 1 3,0281 3,1231 3,2181 3,3121 3,407 1
I A12 1 3,2471 3,3491 3,451 I 3,5531 3,6551
1 A13 1 3,4711 3,5791 3,6871 3,7951 3,9031
I 821 1 3,6091 3,745 3,881 I 4,0161 4,1521
! 822 I 3,8241 3;968 4. 11? I tI. ?&;R I A ~()() I
.,"- I .,---.... I ., ......... I
1 823 I 4,040 I 4,192 4,3441 4,496 1 4,6481 1
I 831 1 4,2201 4,405 4,5891 4,7741 4,9591 1
1 832 1 4,5351 4,734 4,9331 5,1321 5,331 1 1
I 041 I 4,6981 4,886 5,0751 5,2641 5,452 1 5,641 1
I C42 1 4,9061 5,103 5,2991 5.496 I 5,6931 5,8901
1 043 1 5,1131 5,318 I 5,5231 5,7281 5,9331 6,1381' .
I 051 1 5,2651 5,5011 5,7381 5,9751 6,211 I 6,448 I
I 052 1 5,5661 5,8171 6,0671 6,3181 6,5691 6,820 I
I 061 1 5,7031 5,9891 6,2751 6,5601 6,8461 7,131 1
1 062 5,905 6,2001 6,495 I 6,7901 7,0841 7,3791
1 063 6,102 6,407 1 6,7121 7,0171 7,3221 7,6271
I ~-.. 6,230 .... ro--r/ . 6,-913 i 7,255 i 7,5961 7,938 i
I UI I 0,:;)11 I
072 6,525 6,8821 7,239 I 7,5961 7,9531 8,3101
E81 6,632 6,9631 7,2951 7,6261 7,9581 8,2891 8,621
E82 6,818 7,1601 7,5021 7,8431 8,185 I 8,5271 8,868
E83 7,012 7,3631 7,7141 8,0651 8,415 1 8,7661 9,117
E91 7,249 7,6121 7,9751 8,3381 8,701 1 9,0641 9.427
E92 7,535 7,913 I 8,290 I 8,6671 9,0451 9,422 I 9,800 I
F101 7,822 8,2141 8,6051 8,9971 9,3891 9,780 I 10,1721
F102 8,108 8,5141 8,920 I 9,3261 9,7321 10,138 I 10,5441
Non-rep sala:-y 1l-04.doc
.
ATTACHMENT B
NON-REPRESENTED EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
~~OCIAL SECURITY (FICA): Social Security benefits shall be provided as contained in Section
2.,52.010 ofthe Tukwila Municipal Code.
STATE-WIDE EMPLOYEE: RETIREMENT SYSTEM (PERS): Retirement shall be provided as
Gontained ihSection 2.52.020 of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
HOLIDAYS: Holidays shall be provided as contained in Section 2.52.030 of the Tukwila
hAunicipal Code.
SICK LEAVI;: Sick leave shall be provided as contained in Section 2.52.040 of the Tukwila
IlI1unicipalCode. '
MEDICAL INSURANCE: The City shall pay 100% of the premium for the regular full-time
employee and all dependents under the City of Tukwila self-insured medical/dental plan or
Group Health Cooperative. Regular part-time employees shall be entitled to benefits on a pro-
rata basis.
[)ENTAL!NSURANCE: The City shall provide 100% of the premium for the regular full-time
E~mployee and all dependents under the City of Tukwila self-insured medical/dental plan.
Regular part-time employees shall be entitled to benefits on a pro-rata basis.
LIFE INSURANCE: For renular full-time employees, the City shall pay the premium for Plan C
(Multiple of annualearninHs) or similar group life and accidental death and dismemberment
insurance policy. Said plan shall be at 100% of annual earnings rounded up to the next $1,000.
VISION/OPTICAL/HEARING CARE: The City shall provide coverage for eye examinations,
vision, optical, and hearin!j care to non-represented regular full-time employees and their
dependents at the, rate of $200 per person, to a maximum of $400 per family unit, each year.
Hegular part-time employe'9s and their dependents shall be entitled to benefits on a pro-rata
basis.
()!SABILllYINSURANCE: The City shall provide 100% of the premium for regular full-time
employee$ for a comprehensive long-term disability policy.
VACATION: Following the 5th month of continuous employment, annual vacation leave of 6 full
days (six, 8-hour periods) !;hall be granted. Thereafter, an additional day of annual leave shall
nccrue each month, up to a total of 12 days. Three additional days of annual leave shall be
wanted on the employee's anniversary date after the 3rd, 4th, and 5th years. After 6 years, the
E!mployee shall be granted 1 day per year additional annual leave to a maximum of 24 days per
year. The maximum number of accrued hours is 384, or 48 days.
Years, Vacation Years Vacation
or Service Accruai or Service, Accrual
0-1 years 12 days* 10 years 19 days
1-2 years 12 days 11 years 20 days
3-6 years 15 days 12 years 21 days
7 years 16 days 13 years 22 days
8 years 17 days 14 years 23 days
9 years 18 days 15 years 24 days (maximum)
*Six (6) full days will be granted following the 6th month of continuous employment.
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE: An annual uniform allowance of $350 shall be granted to the
following employees: Assistant Fire Chief; Police Lieutenant, Police Captain, Fire Chief, Police
Chief.
Non-rep salaryl1-04.doc
Finance and Safety Committee
November 15,2004
Present:
Dave. Fenton,< Chair; Joan Hernandez, Dennis Robertson
AlanDoerschel, Viki Jessop, Kevin Fuhrer, Rhonda Berry, Nick Olivas, Lucy
Lauterbach
1. 2005 BudQ'et Review The Committee reviewed Administrative Services. They asked Viki
what information would be available for public access on the web. Dave asked where
connectivity wason the City's agenda. He wanted it to be kept alive even ifthere cannot be
action now. Viki said she might do some reclassifications of positions next year, and asked
whether they should be budgeted. Alan said he generally pays those on the year-end budget
adjustments, since the changesusuallydon't start until midyear.
In the Fire Department they learned the Department has not been able to staff the aid car more
than 5%a year because of having to cover for vacation, Kelley days and days off. The
Committee talked about considering the cost of overtime versus an extra worker. They also
talked about the potential for very large future costs for taking care of health care costs for
LEOFF I firefighters their whole lives.' There is a fund to pay for it" though future costs may take
much of or more than the budget.
The Committee recommended some clarifications and needed changes, and approved their
budgets. Budeetreview complete.
\V 2. Non-Reo COLA Increases Every even-numbered year (such as 2004) non-represented
-""employee salaries are !ffialyzed for an in,house market !ffialysis. Iu odd years non-rep employees
receive a Cost of Living (90% of the Seattle-Tacoma-Bremerton Semi-Annual Average.
Employees who are above the control point in the study receive a COLA in even years. A
resolution to pass the annual increase was passed out at Committee. Recommend issue to
November 22 COW and Soecial MeetinQ'.
3. Animal Control Issues Dennis raised the issue of the City's current approach to animal
control by paying for 12 hours extra patrol in Tukwila each week may not be achieving our goal
of providing the best animal control. He thoughtit would be better to contract for some amount
like $10,000 for animal control responding to calls of dangerous dogs. This could be done with
either Des Moines or King County., The Committee thought this might have merit. The idea will
need further research. Information.
Committee chair approval
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
4 +I Initials ITEMNO.
Q S S I Meeting Date I Prepared by I Mayor's review I Cowl! review
O
1 11/22/04 I FBI
I I 1 1 i
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 04-164 'ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 2004
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 11 /22/04
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PW/
SPONSOR'S The Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee was recently created to
SUMMARY advise the King County Executive, the Solid Waste Interlocal Forum, and the King County
Council in all matters relating to solid waste and participate in the development of the
waste export system plan. Cities participating in the King County solid waste system are
requested to appoint a representative and an alternate to the Committee.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 11/16/04
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Appoint Frank Iriarte as City's representative Jim Morrow as alternate
COMMI "I 1EE Same as Sponsor forward to COW for discussion
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED CITY FUNDS REQUIRED
n/a
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
11/22/04 1
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
11/22/04 Information Memo dated November 8, 2004 (revised from 11/16 UC)
King County Solid Water Division Letter and Ordinance
Utilities Committee Meeting Minutes from November 16, 2004
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor Mullet
Public Works Director
November 8,2004
MetroDolitanSolid Waste Mana2"ement Advisorv Committee
ISSUE
King County Solid Waste Division requests City's participation on a newly established
Metropolitan Solid W asteManagement Advisory Committee (MSWMAC) - see attachment.
BACKGROUND
The MSWMAC (Committee) was recently created by King County Ordinance 14971 to advise
the Executive, the Solid Waste InterlocalForum, and the King County Council in all matters
relating to solid waste and to participate in the development of the waste export system plan.
The Committee will facilitate, the resolution of solid waste issues and improve communications
between King County and cities. Until the Committee convenes in 2005, the inter jurisdictional
group consisting of representatives from cities (including Tukwila) will serve in lieu of the
Committee.
DISCUSSION
Cities participating in King County 's solid waste, system are requested to appoint a representative
and an alternate to the Committee.' City representatives could be staff personnel, council
members, or a combination of staff/council members. To date, eleven cities have appointed
represefltatives to the Committee. Six cites have appointed staff and five have appointed city
council members. Appointment to the Committee is an informal process and does not require
council approval.
Given the significance of the work that the Committee will have to accomplish and the impact
that the Committee will have in shaping this region's future solid waste system, it is important
for the City 'to have representation in the Committee. Jim Morrow and Frank lriarte have been
working withthe'interjusrisdictional technical staff group for several months. Recommend that
they be allowed to continue representing the City in the newly created Committee.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the Mayor to appoint Frank Iriarte as the City's representative and Jim Morrow as
the City's alternate to the Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee.
attachment: KC Solid Waste Division letter dated August 23,2004
(p:a1iccllnfo Memo-MSWMAC)
-
.~.#~~_:~::-~-~;~.\
{"""\"~'
f /- ...-\"
,; .1
, '~t'~;c,;:;,;;0l.
(~;;) \j:;l t~/
Solid Waste Dhiision
Department ofNatoralResources and Parks
Ki-~ Street Center ,,',
201 ~outh Jackson Street, Suite 701
Seattle, WA9.B104-3855
206-296-6Sd
711 TlY Relay!
RECEIVEO-
4 AUG 2 5 2004
CITY OF
MA YOA'STOUK WI LA
FF1CE
August 23, 2004
The Honorable Steve Mullett
Mayor, City of Tukwila ,',
6200 SouthcenterBlvd, Suite '100
Tukwila, WA 98l88-2544
Dear Mayor Mullett:
King County Solid Waste Division would like to request your city's participation on a newly
created Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee (committee). The committee
was created by Ordinance Number l4971, which was approved by the King County Council on
July 26,2004.
The role of the committee is to advise the King County Executive, King County Council and Solid
Waste InterlocalForum on all solid waste management issues. Each component city with a signed
interlocalagreementparticipatingin King County's solid waste system is requested to appoint a
representative andaltemate to the committee.
The committee will be modeled after the Metropolitan Water Pollution Abatement Advisory
Committee (MWPAAC), which advises the King County Council and King County Executive 011
matters related to reduCing water pollution. MWPAAC was created by state law (RCW 35.58.210)
and consists of representatives from cities and sewer districts that operate sewer systems in King
County.
The committee is scheduled to begin meeting on or after January 2, 2005. Until the committee
convenes, an interjurisdictional technical staff group will serve in lieu of the committee and shall
assist the committee at least until December 31, 2005. "The staff group will provide a report of its
findings and recommendations by December3l, 2004 to all cities, the King County Executive, the
King CountyCouncil,theSolid Waste Advisory Committee and the Solid Waste Interlocal Forum
on the structure, function and responsibilities of the committee.
In addition to creating the committee, Ordinance Number 14971 also sets out the process and timing
for planning for waste export. Attached for your information are copies of the legislation, a
summary of the legislationprepared by City of Redmond staff person Nina Rivkin, and a table
containing the names and contactinforrnation for the interjurisdictional technical staff group.
TheHonorable Steve Mullett
'.', August23,' 2004
Page 2
Please transmit the name of yom city's representative and alternate by December 1,2004 to
. Diane Yates, Intergovernmental Relations Liaison, Solid Waste Division, at 206-296-4406 or
diane.vates(CV,metrokc.gov. If you have any questions about the new committee or the legislation,
please contact, Diane Yates.
If you have any other questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at 206-296-4385.
Enclosures
Sincerely,
~WJq
Theresa J enni s
Division Director
cc: City ofTukwila Councilmembers
ATTN: Jane Cantu,CityClerk
RhondaBerry, Acting City Administrator, City of Tukwila
Jim Morrow, Public Works Director, City of Tukwila
Judy Stenberg, Chair, King County Solid Waste Advisory Committee
Metropolitan King CountyCouncilmembers
A TTN: 'Scott White, Chief of Staff
Anne Noris, Clerk of the Council
,Shelley Sutton, Policy Staff Director
Ron Sims, King<CountyExecutive
Ryan Bayne, Council Relations Director, Executive Office
Pam Bissonnette, Director, Department ofNatmal Resources & Parks
Diane Yates, Intergovernmentai Reiations Liaison, Solid Waste Division
'Ordinance14971(Proposed Ordinance 2004-0125.2 as adopted)
Planning for Future Solid Waste System- Waste Export and Transfer System
Section 1. Findings
Findings of fact have been revised to reflect:
1. transfer station svstem mustbe planned for as an integral part of the waste export plan
and transfer ,system and waste export system must both be part of a system plan
2. reauirement bvordinance for independent third-partv review of competitive alternatives
to the Fisher Mill Flour property as a potential site for an intermodal facility
3. identification of work thatwill be performed to develop the waste export svstem plan,
including processes providing forinput from all stakeholders and interested parties
4. KinaCountvintends to establish an advisory committee of representatives from each
city with a solid waste interlocal agreement, forcity input into development of plan, to
improve communication between KC and cities, and facilitate resolution of issues
Section 2. Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee
. An advisory committee is established, consisting of a representative and alternate from
each city with a solid waste interlocal agreement with King County
~ modeled after MWPAAC , Metropolitan Water Pollution Abatement Advisory
Committee
. Committee will conduct its first meetina on or after Januarv 2. 2005
~ provides time for cities to designate representatives/alternates to the committee
. Purpose of committee is to advise the executive, SWIF, and council on all matters
relating to solid waste, and to participate in development of the waste export system plan
. Committee will review and make recommendations on the waste export system plan
prior to transmittaloftheplan from the executive to the council
. Interiurisdictional technical staff aroup (group of staff currently convened to make
recommendations on this legislation) will serve in lieu of the advisory committee until the
committee is convened, and will advise the committee during its first year of work
~ each.citymay participate in interjurisdictional staff group
~ ensures transition and continuity of work performed in 2004 and 2005
. inieriurisdiciional siaff aroup wiil provide recommendations bv December 3;.2004 on
the structure, function and responsibilities of the advisory committee
. Interiurisdictional staff aroup will provide report/recommendations bv December 31. 2005
on (1) modification/replacement of SWIF, (2) dispute resolution options, (3) framework
for financial policies, (4) impact of waste export system plan on solid waste interlocal
agreement between King County and cities,and (5) potential amendments to the
interlocalagreement
. SWIF will make a recommendation bv December 31. 2005 on the continuing role of the
interjurisdictional staff group
. Solid waste division will provide staff support to the advisory committee and
interjurisdictional staffgiOup and council will provide staff support in deveioprneni of
solid waste planning legislation
Section 3. Informal Discussions between King County and Cities
King County and cities may engage in informal discussions re: potential changes to solid
waste interlocal agreement Cities will not lose any right to review and re-negotiate the
interlocalagreement, pursuant to re-opener provision contained in the current agreement
~
(citi~s may choose to postpone negotiations until after the waste export system plan is
submitted to the counciland SWIF in December 2005). Informal discussions are not binding
in future negotiations .unless discussions are formalized in a properly executed agreement.
Section 4. Amendrnentto current King County Code .
Changes the, date from September to April when the solid waste division submits their annual
report to the council, so the report can be used to plan for the budget for the following year.
SectionS. Solid ,Waste System Planning
A. Plannina Process- fon:fev,elopment of solid waste export plan - interjurisdictional staff
group and advisory committee work with solid waste division to develop waste export
system plan
B. Business Plan- will address issues such as emergency capacity, system reliability,
impacts of future system choices on employees, strategies to encourage competition,
and 'preserving service levels " .
C. Scope of Work and Analvsis of Technical Issues.
~ Develop level of service (LOS) standards and criteria for transfer system
.~ Identify needed transfer system improvements, replacements andlor additions and
estimated costs based on LOS standards
~' Analyze public and private transfer station ownership and operational options
~ Developlevelofservice (LOS) standards and criteria for intermodal capacity needs
~ Analyze public and private intermodal facility ownership and operational options
~' Analyze waste transport costs and feasibility
,~ Analyze landfill capacity
D. Independent Evaluation of Waste Exoort Svstem Plan - county provide for independent
evaluation of transfer and waste export system alternatives and recommendations;
council, after consultation with SWIF, will define scope of evaluation and guide selection
of independent review panel, experts
Section 6. Schedule
. Waste export svstem plan due December 15. 2005
. Solid waste division will report regularly to the council and SWIF throughout
development of plan
. Four milestones, when solid waste division must submit reports to council and SWIF, for
council approval by motion
1. Level of Service (LOS) standards and criteria for transfer system - report due
October 15, 2004
2. Analysis of system needs and capacity
3. Analysis of options for public and private ownership and operations
4. Preliminary transfer and waste export facility recommendations, and estimated
system costs, rate impacts and financial policy assumptions
. Motionapprovina milestone reports will include timeline for submittal of next milestone.
report (i.e. the motion approving the first milestone report on transfer system LOS
standards/criteria will include the timeline for submittal of the second milestone report on
analysis of system needs and capacity)
. 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Manaaement Plan ucdate will begin December 1,
2005, per King County Code (update must occur every three years), with completion of
update anticipated by December 2007; waste export system plan will be basis for
formulating recommendations on waste transfer and disposal for this update
Solid.Waste Staff Group
f~.~9$N3.mg_~i.i~~~n11~plt1:i~i~I~~~t~i$fJ1Bii6'<<~~\\~ ~~~.i~~1.~t:~l&~~m~iE}I_~-
Carolyn Armanini KC SWAC! Lake Forest 206-365-1747 carmanini@earthlink.net
Park City Council
Jim Arndt I Kirkland
Ryan Bayne I KCExecutive
I Alison Bennett I. Bellevue
I Elaine Bodeson I Kirkland
I Bill Brandon ISnoqualmie Valley Citie~
I Mark Buscher I KC SWD
I Diane Carlson I Bellevue
Rika Cecil I Shoreline
Sharon Conroy I Auburn
Damon Diessner I Bellevue
I Peggy Dorothy I KC Council Staff
I PaufHaines . I Shoreline
I Lys Hornsby I Renton
I Michael Huddleston I KC Council. Staff
I Frank Iriarte I Tukwila
I Valarie Jarvi IWoodinville
Theresa Jennings I KC SWD
Kevin Kiernan I KC SWD
Linda Knight I Renton
Paul Krauss I Auburn
Patrick Lynch I Woodinville
Beth Mountsier I KC Council Staff
Mike Reed IKC Council Staff
Dave Rhodes I Redmond
Nina Rivkin 'I Redmond
Carolyn Robertson I Auburn
Jerry Shuster I Shoreline
Rob Van Orsow I Federal Way
Rick Watson. I Bellevue
Diane Yates I KC SWD
Diane/swsg/swsg contact list
I 425-828-7240
I 206-296-4140
1425-452-2808
425-828-l205
425-333-4192
206-296-4360
425-452-4225
206-546-0460
253-931-5103
I 425-452-4480
1206-296-1658
I' 206-546-3578
I 425-430-7239
I 206-296-1672
1206-431-2445
I 425-489-2700
1206-296-4385
1206-296-4419
I 425-430-7397
1253-931-3090
I 425-489-2700
I 206-296-0319
1 206-296-l627
I 425-556-2701
I 425-556-2l03
I 253-93l-3096
I 206-546-l700
I 253-66l-4l4l
I 425-452-4896
I 206-296-4406
I iarndtcmci.kirkland.wa.us
I Rvan.b-avne@metrokc.Qov
I abennett@ci.bellevue.wa.us
I ebor.ieson@ci.kirkland.wa.us
I billbcmci.carnation. wa. us
I Mark buscher@metrokc.gov
I dcarlson@cLbellevue.wa.us
I rcecilUl2cf.shoreline. wa.us
I sconrovUl2ci.auburn.wa.us
IddiessnerUl2ci. bellevue. wa. us
I PeggY.dorothYUl2metrokc.gov
I DhainesUl2ci.shoreline.wa.us
Ilhornsb;Ul2ci.renton. wa. us
I Michae1.huddlestonUl2metrokc.gov
I firiarteUl2ci.tukwila.wa.us
I valariei@ci.woodinville.wa.us
I Theresa. ienningsUl2metrokc.gov
Kevin.kiernanUl2metrokc. gOY
lknightUl2cLrenton. wa. us
DkraussUl2cLaubum. wa. us
DatricklUl2ci. woodinville. wa. us
Beth.mountsierUl2metrokc. QOV
Mike.reeduv.metrokc.Qov
drhodesUl2ci .redmond. wa. us
nrivkinUl2ci.redmond. wa. us
crobertsonuv.ci.auburn. wa. us
i shusterUl2ci . shoreline. wa. us
robv{atcitvoffederalwav.com
rwatsonUl2ci. bellevue. wa. us
Diane. vatesuv.metrokc. QOV
1200 King County Courthouse
516 Third Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104
Signature Report
July 27, 2004
Ordinance 14971
Proposed No. ,2004-0125.2
Sponsors Ferguson, Edmonds, Lambert,
Patterson and Irons
1
AN ORDINANCE relating tothe timing for planning for
2
wastee~port and annually reporting the solid waste
.3
division's progress toward objectives identified in the
4
comprehensive solid waste management plan; amending
5
Ordinance 7737, Section 2, as amended, and
6
K.C.C.10.24.020 and adding a new section to K.C.C.
7
chapter 10.25.
8
9
10 BE ITORDAINbu BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY:
11 SECTION 1. Findings.
12 A. In Ordinance 14236 and the 2001 Final Comprehensive Solid Waste
13 ManagementPlan, the council made the policy determination to export the county's solid
14 waste to one or more landfills after the county's Cedar Hills regional landfill reaches
15 capacity and must close.' The council rejected alternatives to waste export, including.
16 development of a new. landfill in King County or incinerating the county's waste.
1
Ordinance 14911
17 B. In Ordinance 14236, the council directed the county executive to begin to
18 irriplernentthe P()licy to export the county's waste by developing a waste export
19 coordination and implementation plan ("the waste export system plan").
C.,The2001 Final Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan also included
21 policies 011 transfer.stationsandthe future transfer station system. The majority of the
22 CUrrent transfer stations were planned for and developed in the 1960s. The most-recent
23 . reviewofthetransfer station system was conducted for the 2001 Comprehensive Solid
24 Waste Management Plan update. The future transfer station system must be planned and
25 developed asanintegralpartof the waste export system plan.
26 D. 'Waste export may require the county to secure intennodal capacity to transfer
27 sealed containers of solid waste from trucks to rail cars.
28 E., The 2001 Final 'Solid Waste Comprehensive Management Plan Policy DSW-8
29 . directs th~ county executive to'undertake a siting study process for any necessary
30 intermodal facilities that involves all affected jurisdictions and interested parties in the
31 siting study and in the development of site evaluation criteria regarding environmental,
32 technical, financial. and cOullllunity needs.
33 F. An environmental review process for the siting analysis portion of the waste
34 export coordination and implementation plan is required by chapter 197 -11 WAC.
35 . G. The solid waste division became aware of the Fisher Flour Mill property as a
36 potential site for anintermodal facility, and upon King County council approval,
37 purchased the. property in 2003. Ordinance 14710, authorizing the purchase of the Fisher
38 Flour Mill property, requires an independent third-party review of competitive
39 altemativesto the Fisher Flour Mill property as a potential site for an intermodal facility.
2
." ,-,-,,-",
,'.
40
H.To develop the waste export system plan, the county shall:
- .<
41
1. condudacomprehensive evaluation of:
42
43
b.public and private alternati ves for transfer capacity;
44
c.public and private alternatives for waste export;
46
d. site evahlation criteria; and
45
,"
47 2. Performertvironmentalreview for any siting analysis; and
48 3. Obtainindependentthird-party review of competitive alternatives to the
49 FisherFlour Mill property as a potential site for an intermodal facility.
50 I. The waste export system plan must be developed with processes that provide
51 forinput f.l....ulall stakeholders and interested parties.
52 J. King County intends to establish an advisory committee for city input into the
53 development of the\Vaste export system plan~ to improve the communication of
54 infv.l.l.l.lation between King County and cities and to facilitate the resolution of solid waste
55 managementissues with city partners and customers. The advisory committee wili
56 consist of representatives from each city with a signed"solidwaste interlocal agreement
57 'participating in the county solid waste management system.
58 NEW SECTION. SECTION 2. There is hereby added to K.C.C. chapter 10.25 a
59 new section to read as follows:
60 Metr.opolitan solid waste management advisory committee.
61 A. A metropolitan solid waste management advisory committee is established.
62 Each component city with a signed interlocal agreement participating in the county solid
._,.~ .....-"...-. ....-...- ,..-..".---.
3
63 wastemanagemenfsystem shall identify representatives and alternates to the solid waste
64 division for appointment to the advisory committee. The committee shall conduct its first
65 meeting on or after January 2, 2005. The solid waste division shall notify each
66 component city with a signed interlocal agreement participating in the county solid waste
67 managementsysternofcommittee meeting ~imes and locations. At the first meeting, the
68 committee shall elect a chair. The members of the committee shall serve at the pleasure
69 of the appointing bodies and shall receive no compensation from KingCounty other than
70 reimbursement fotreasonableexpenses actually incurred in the perfonnance of their
71 duties.
72 B. The metropolitan solid waste management advisory committee shall advise the
73 executive, the solid wasteinterlocal forum established in the solid waste service contracts
74 betweenthecourity and cities, and the King County council in all matters relating to solid
75 wastemanagementandparticipate in the development of the solid waste management
76 system and waste export system plan.
77 ~. The metropolitan solid waste management advisory 'committee shall review
78 ^nd ~,",1,.,",,- -~~_......._"......:I~...;_........- -- ...t...~ '!'!.1...........~ 60....--...... .............+....- Pl^_ be~--;'3 ..._...._...._.:........1 _.c...t....~
"1 U1C11\." L","VIUIU\JUUClL1VU<) VU UL" yya<)L\,o \J.I\.pVIL i))<)L\JHl iau . LVi.... LLaUi)iHLLLC11 VA. Ul"
79 plan from the King County executive to'the King County council.
80 D.l. Until the metropolitan solid waste management advisory committee first
81 co~venes,an inter jurisdictional technical staff group presently assembled shall serve in
82 lieu of the metropolitan solid waste management advisory committee. The
83 interjurisdictionaltechnical staff group shall advise the metropolitan solid waste
84 management advisorycorruriittee. through December 31, 2005, to assist the committee
85 during its first year of work. Each city with a solid waste interlocal agreement with King
4
.' ' '.', ''-,',,_'
Ordinance 14971
86 County may participate in theinterjurisdictionaltechnical staff group. The group shall
87 provide a report>of itsfindingsand recommendations by December 31, 2004, to all cities
88 participating in the county solid waste management system, the King County executive,
89Kirig County council, the solid Waste advisory committee and the solid waste interlocal
90 forum, or its successor, on the structure, function and responsibilities of the metropolitan
91 solid wa~te management advisorycommittee. The staff group shall provide a report of
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
.102
103
104
105.
106
107
its' findings andrecommeridations. by December 31, 2005, to all cities participating in the
county solid waste management system, the metropolitan solid waste management
advisory .committee, the King County executive, King County council, the solid waste
advisory committee and the solid waste interlocal forum, or its successor.
2. The inter jurisdictional technical staff group report shall address at least the
following issues:
a. potential modification or replacement of the solid waste interlocal forum, to
identify membership, decision-making responsibilities and scope of duties;
b. identi.ficationofdispute resolution options;
c. development ofaftamework for financial policies and host city mitigation,
including compensation agreements;
d. evaluation of the impact of the proposed waste export system plan on each
of the provisions ofthe.solid waste interlocal agreement between King County and cities;
and
e. identification ofpotential amendments to the solid waste interlocal
agreement.
..~,.' "., ,~. ....
.... ...,~ ..--.... .. .... ,.... .
5
108
109
110.
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
1"'1
,/,oJ
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
3. The solidwasteinterlocal forum, orlts successor, shall make a
recoI1lmendation to the King County executive and King County council on or before
December 31, 2005, on the efficacy of the continuing role of the interjurisdictional
technical staff group.
B.The solid waste division shall provide staff support to the metropolitan solid
waste manageIIlent advisory committee and theinterjurisdictional technical staff group.
. ' The King County council shall provide staff support in the development of solid waste
planning legislation.
SECTION 3. King County and any city exercising its right under Section 5.1 of
its solid waste interlocal agreement with the county may engage in infonnal discussions
regarding potential changes to any of the ,provisions of the interlocal agreement. A city's
decision to engage or not to engage in such infonnal discussions shall not constitute a
waiver of the city's exercise of its rights under Section 5.1 to either review or renegotiate,
or both,. the solid waste interlocal agreement. This authorization to engage in infonnal
discussions does not constitute consent to negotiate any provision under Section 5.2 of
'+1.."'^gre~-~-+-o~c~'n. ...+:+.,,+'" ^ ."^:..,,,~ '"'f +1..e ~e~"li.~e-~-" _& -U..__~1 ~-ns--" &_- ..'--_
un;.. a ~~H~~ln 11 J. VI inu."n... a ""at. VI,;,J. V ~H I. "iU ,UI.CIU VI III ~Uc11 '"'Vi CU~ IVI ~UC
. negotiation of any provision under Section 5.2 of the agreement. Any informal
discussions shall not be binding on any party in any future negotiations and shall not be
relied upon by any party, unless the discussions or agreements have been formalized in a
properly executed agreement.
SECTION 4. Ordinance 7737, Section 2, as amended, and K.C.C.I0.24.020 are
each herehy amended to read as follows:
Responsibilities.
6
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
.144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
'. 'Oralnancet4971
A.Thedivision shall maintain the plan in a current condition and shall propose
necessary plan revisions, to the council at least once every three years.
B. The King County solid waste advisory committee shall review and comment
upon the proposed plan prior to its submittal to the council for adoption.
C. The designated interlocal forum, or its .successor, shall have the following
responsi t:iili ties:
1. .Advise the King County council and executive and other jurisdictions as
appropriate on all policy aspects of solid waste management and planning and consul~
withimd advise the King County solid waste division on technical issues;
.2. Review and comment on alternatives and recommendations for the county
comprehensivesolidwast~ management plan and facilitate approval of the plan by each
jurisdiction;
3. Review'proposed interlocal agreements between King County and cities for
planning, recycling and waste stream control;
4. Review disposal rate proposals; ,
5 Rp'vjpm c:!t~h1!C! rpT\nrtg nn Ul.1<!t.. <!tr....m r..~11..t."" ......."..1........ ............"'y""....r1
..__~. _'-ITI ......_.._i,.,o .....-1:'-.....0 .........,.;- ". _u....,..........__......... ...____......"'......, ..._"")"'..&.1.......0' "'.......""'.L6 ",".au.
resource recovery;. and solid waste operations with interjurisdictional impact;
6. Promote information exchange and interaction between waste generators,
local govenunents with collection authority, recyclers and county-planned and operated
disposal system;
7. Provide coordination opportunities between the King County solid waste
division, local,governments, private operators and recyclers; and
7
-
153 8. Aidcitiesinrecogriizingmunicipal solid waste responsibilities, including
154 collection andrecycling, and effectively carrying out those responsibilities.
155 ((f3;)}D. The council shall hold a public hearing on the draft plan and another
156 public hearing on the final planbefore adoption of the plan. Any city using county
157 disposal sites shall be notified of these public hearings and shall be requested to comment
158 on the plan.
159 ((F;)) E. ,The division shall submit to the council by ((September)) A!>rill of each
160 year an annual reportofitsprogress toward objectives identified in the plan.
161 ((G:))F. Interlocalagreements between the county and cities wishing to plan
162 jointly with the county orto authorize the co~nty to plan for it shall identify which party
163 is responsible for city solid waste operational' plans, tonnage forecasts( (,)) and recycling
164 goals.
165 G. The division shall Drovide staffsuDoort to the metroDolitan solid waste
166 manalZement advisorv committee and the interiurisdictional technical staff erOUD.
167 SECTION 5. Solid waste system planning. The develvpment ofthe waste
168 export system plan, inCluding comprehensive analysis of public and private transfer
169 station and system capacity, transfer system efficiency and waste export for the next
170 comprehensive solid waste management plan update, shall include, but not be limited to,
171 the following:
172 A. The process for developing the waste export system plan shall be guided by
173 the adopted 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan that directs the county
174 to involve all affected jurisdictions and interested parties in siting process decisions, and
175 by Ordinance 14710. Theinterjurisdictional technical staff group and the metropolitan
8
- .-,
Ordinance 14971
176 solid waste managementaclvisory committee shall work with the solid waste division to
177 develop the waste export system plan, including development of the business plan, future
178 transfer station systemaltematives and waste export system alternatives;
179 B.Preparingabusiness plan, which should at a minimum address:
180 1. Emergency capacity;
181 2. System reliability;
182 3. Efforts to coordinate planning and operations with other jurisdictions;
183 4. Possible impacts of future system choices on employees;
184' 5. Strategies to encourage competition;
185 6. Preserving service levels and value for customers;
186 7. Integrationofwaste export activities with the transfer network;
187 8. Environmental protection; and
188 9., The potential benefits ofa federated system; and
189 C. Scope of work and analysis of technical issues for development of a waste
190 export system plan shall consider the solid waste handling system as a whole. Major
191 technical elements shall include, but not be limited to:
192 1. . DevelvJ:'utent of transfer system level of service standards and criteria, such
193 as evaluation of traffic flow impacts and queuing, that provide objective measures for
194 when a transfer station needs to be upgraded in place, relocated to a more appropriate
195 location, or additional transfer stations need to be built to adequately serve the region's
196 growing population;
9
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
'Ordinance14971
2. Identification of needed transfer system improvements, replacements or
additionss or any combination thereof, and their respective estimated costs based on level
of servicestandafds;
3. Analysis of both public and private transfer station ownership and operational
options;
4. Development of level of service standards and criteria that provide objective
measures for a solid waste intermodal capacity needs analysis;
5. Analysis of both public and private intennodal facility ownership and
operational options;
6. Analysis of waste transport cost and feasibility;
7. 'Analysis of landfill capacity; and
8. Ip.dependent evaluation of waste export system plan. Consistent with
Ordinance 14710,the county shall provide for an independent evaluation of the transfer
and waste export system alternatives and recommendations to inform the county's
decision-making on the waste export system plan, by convening an expert independent
review Danel. The council. after consultation with the solid waste inteflocal forum, or itc;
.&. - .- -.- - . - - - - -
successors shall defiqethe scope of the evaluation to be conducted and guide the selection
of independentreviewpanel experts.
SECTiON 6. Reporting.
A. The solid Waste division shall submit a waste export system plan to the
council and solid waste interlocal forum or its successor by December 15, 2005. The
division shall also regularly report back to the council and solid waste interlocal forums
or-its successor, throughout the system plan development process.
10
220 B.Majorririlestonesforreportsto be submitted by the solid waste division to the
221 council and solidwasteinterlocalforum, or its successor, for review and council approval
222 by motion shall include, but are not Hmited to:
223 1. 'Transfersystem level of service standards and criteria;
224 2. Analysis of system needs alJdcapacity;
225 3. Analysis of options for public andprivate ownership and oper~tion;
226 4. Prelimin,ary transfer and waste export facility recommendations, and
227 estimated systelllCosts, rate impacts and financial policy assumptions.
228 C.Thecouncilshall,if approving subriritted solid waste division reports for
229 major milestones, make the approval by motion. Each motion shall also include a
230 timeline for submittaloffuture mj1estone reports still pending. The first milestone report
231 pertaining to level of service standards and criteria for future system needs shall be
232 suhmitted to tl1ecouncil and solid waste interlocal forum on or before October 15, 2004.
233 D. In accordance withK.C.C. 10.24.020.A, the solid waste division shall begin
234 updating the · adopted 2001 'Comprehensive. Solid Waste Management Plan by December
235 1, 2005, with completion of the update process anticipated by December 2007. The
236 waste export systernplan shall be used as the basis for fomlUlating recommendations for
11
~
Ordinance 14971
237 solid waste transfer and disposal fortheupdate of the 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste
238 Management Plan.
239
Ordinance 14971 was introduced on 3/15/2004 and passedby the Metropolitan King
County Council" on 7/26/2004, by the following vote:
YeS: 13-Mr. Phillips, Ms, Edmonds, Mr. van Reichbauer, Ms. Lambert, Mr.
" Pelz, Mr..McKenna,.Mr. Ferguson, Mr. Hammond, Mr. dossett, Ms. Hague,
.Mr. IrQns, Ms. Patterson and Mr. Constantine
No: 0
Excused: 0
AlltST:
.P~
Anne Nods, Clerk of the Council '
APPROVEDthis A day Of~, 2004.
()
k<~
Ron-Sims, Coun~Executiv~
Attachments None
.~
~ ~
::.~ ~
~ .3:Ia
C> ~.:o
s C") . Gj r-r-.
~:..-~ '"
--r ~...!. 0
-..~ ~I J
:;]~ ~ !!]
~ .. '"
.f:! '::> Ti'r
.-"... .c-- r::;;
CO
12
.'
Present:
Utilities Committee
November 16, 2004
Pam Carter, Chair; Pam Linder, Dennis Robertson
Jim Morrow, Gail Labanara,Mike Cusick, Bob Giberson, Frank Iriarte, Pat
Brodin, LucyLauterbach
)~ L Metropolitan SrrUilWasieMana2ementAdvisorv Committee A new group is being
\ fonned, anditsJongnamehasresulted in calling it MSWMAC, pronounced Mishmak. King
County Solid Waste Division has asked for all cities including Tukwila's participation in the
group. They will advise the King County Executive as well as the Solid Waste Interlocal Forum
and County Council about solid waste issues. Our garbage franchise with the County runs until
2028. Eleven.cities have appointed representatives and alternates appointed to the MSWMAC
thus far. Six have been,staffrepresentatives, andfive have been elected officials. The
Committee wanted to offer the chance to be on the Committee to any Council Member who was
interested.,lfno Council Of Mayor volunteers, Jim Morrow and Frank Iriarte will serve as
member and alternate.
One of the issuesaroundsolidwaste is mandatory garbage pick up. The County may want
everyone to have this service when it starts to export its waste when Cedar Hills closes in eight
years. Tukwila,h~sthe highest percentage of self-haulers 'in the area. This may change as the
County makes it more difficult to self-haul with shorter hours and higher costs. For people who
visit the dump once or twice a year, this could hurt them. The Committee wanted to talk about
mandatory garbage at their Council retreat. Recommend issue of representation to MSWMAC
to COW.
2. Cascade Water Alliance Pat Brodin updated the Committee on Cascade Water Alliance
(CW A). The budget has been proposed at $29.9 million for 2005. Pat said Tukwila will get a
$106,877 refund from the purveyor balance accountfrom the previous contract. CW A is buying
the Bellevue/lssaquahpipeline for the Sammamish plateau for $13 million. They're negotiating
with Seattle to use Sea.ttlepipes for the Tacoma Second Supply line water, but Seattle wants too
much money for that so far. The status of Lake Tapps water is that CW A is working with Puget
Sound Energy (PSE) to buy facilities and .real estate. The pipeline is on schedule, though there is
some issue with the Native American tribes now suing about water use. PSE has stepped away
from the dam there, and CWA may acquire it for controlling water flows. Update information.
3. Other Sound Transirhas paid half oftheir construction permit funds to the City. That fee
amounts to $887 ,000 for this year, and a similar amount will be paid again next year. They have
a1..", P"I'd' a'b","t <1:"50 ""0.....0,. undp"O!"o"nr'li"g JI'mal"'''' 'tallrprJ ahout hl"\TY1pl",,,r'I "pf',n-ity i""up" T-Tp
J.~V U. -, V"'_" _1toV""'- _ "VV, 114', _.4 """...~.... _ !o.&. ..u..u.J.... . - J. _.,,)V _ ..L~.....u. V '" ..........,...............4_............. ...............-......... ...""''"'''' ........... .....-
will brief the Committee further on this issue in the future.
C? ~ Committee chair approval
1L w COUNCIL AGENDA SvNoPsIs
fJ �sti2 Initials ITEM No.
1 Meeting Date 1 Prepared by 1 Mayor's review 1 Council review 1
I �4N►, 1 11/22/04 1 ARD 1 A I 6 1
C
r soa I 1 1 1
INFORMATION
6
CAS NUMBER: 04-165 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 11/22/04
AGENDA ITEM TITLE 2005 Property Tax Ordinances: (1) Setting the Regular Levy
(2) Increasing the Regular Levy from Previous Year
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 11/22/04 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR El Council Mayor El Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police El PWI
SPONSOR'S These two attached Property Tax Ordinances are required per RCW in order to receive
SUMMARY .revenues in 2005. See attached memorandum.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. El CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 11/1/04
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Please pass as presented
COMMITTEE Preliminary worksheet presented at 11/1/04 Finance Safety meeting
T0 MPAC UND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source: N/A
Comments:
rt :e ^sae -�.F Y 3 +s zs .d
COED OF xGOdg ACTION.-
1
1
$1111 -G DA Eril O` .ATTACHIVIENTS
11/22/04 1 Staff Report dated November 16, 2004
1 King County Assessor Worksheet
1 Finance Safety minutes from November 1, 2004 meeting
1 Ordinance !eying the General Taxes and Attachment
1 Ordinance increasing Levy from Previous Year
1
To:
Mayor & City Council
a~j)
From:
Alan Doerschel, Finance Director
Date:
November16,2004
Subject:
2005 Property Tax Ordinances
The attached Ordinances allow the City to receive Property Tax revenues for 2005. The
estimatedrevertues shown in the Ordinance setting the Levy for 2005 is based on the
most current worksheetftom the Assessor's Office. See attachment. The only
adjustment remaining is the Public Utility number, which comes ftom the State. The
budgeted property tax amountof$1O,530,000 will remain as our actual budget projection
for 2005. This is based on historical uncollectible taxes in previous years.
L.EVYL.IMITWORKSHEET - 2005 Tax Roll
TAXINGDISTRICT: City of Tukwila
Thefollowing determination of your regular levylimitfor 2005 property taxes is provided by the King County
Assessor pursuant to RCW84. 55. 100..
A1ll1exed to Library District
Using Limit Factor
For District
10,482,453
1.0100
10,587,278
19,700,202
o
19,700,202
3.10754
61,219
10,648,497
6,308
10,654,805
3,442,955,284
3.09467
,0
o
o
10,654,805
10,654,805
55,292
10,710,097
10,710,097
3.11073
10,490,175
97,103
0.93%
(Note 1)
Estimated Library rate: 0.48239
Calculation of Limit Factor Levy
Levy basis for calculation: (2004 Statutory) (Note 2)
x Limit Factor
= Levy
Local new construction
+ Increase in utility value (Note 3)
= Total new construction
x Last year's regular levy rate
= New construction levy
Total Limit Factor Levy
Using Implicit
Price Deflator
1 0,482,453
1.0239
10,732,984
19,700,202
o
19,700,202
3.10754
61,219
10,794,203
Annexation Levy
Omitted assessment levy (Note 4)
Tptal Limit Factor Levy + new lid lifts + omits
+ Regular levy assessed value less annexations
= Annexationrate (cannot exceed statutory maximum rate)
x Annexation assessed value
= Annexation Levy
6,308
10,800,511
3,442,955,284
3.13699
o
o
Lid lifts, Refunds and Total
+ First year lid lifts
+ Limit Factor Levy
= Total RCW 84.55 levy
+ Relevyfor prior year refunds (Note 5)
= TotalHCW 84.55 levy + refunds
o
10,800,511
10,800,511
55,292
10,855,803
1 0,855.803 ~
. ..
ALLOWABLE LEVY (Note 6)
Increase Information (Note 7)
Levy rate based on allowable levy
Last year's ACTUAL regular levy
Dollar increase over last year other than N/C - Annex
Percentincrease over last year other than N/C - Annex
3.15305
10,490,175
242,809
2.31%
Calculation of statutory levy
Regular levy assessed value (Note 8)
x Maximum, statutory rate
= Maximum statutory levy
+ Omitted assessments levy
= Maximum statutory levy + omits
Limit factor needed for statutory levy
3,442,955,284
3.11761
10,733,792
6,308
10,740,100
Not usable
ALL YEARS SHOWN ON THIS FORM ARE THE YEARS IN WHICH THE TAX IS PAYABLE.
Please read carefully the notes on the reverse side.
11/16/04 11:35 AM
LevyLimitWS.doc
Notes:
'1) Rates for fire districts and the library district are estimated at the time this worksheet is
produced.' Fire district and. library district rates affect the maximum allowable rate for cities
annexed to them. These rates will change, mainly in response to the actual levy requests
from thefire and library districts. Hence, affected cities may have a higher or lower
allowable levy rate than is shown here when final levy rates are calculated.
2) This figure shows the maximum allowable levy, which may differ from any actual prior levy
if a district has leviedJ~ss than its maximum in prior years. The maximum allowable levy
excludes any allowable refund levyifthe maximum was based on a limit factor. The
maximum allowable levy,excludes.omitted assessments if the maximum was determined by
your district' sstatutoryrate limit. If your district passed a limit factor ordinance in the year
indicated, that limitfactor would help determine the highest allowable levy. However, ifthe
statutory rate limit was:morerestrictive than your stated limit factor, the statutory rate limit is
controlling.
3) Any increase in value in state-assessed property is considered to be new construction value
for purposes of calculating the respective limits. State-assessed property is property
belonging to inter-county utility and transportation companies (telephone, railroad, airline
companies andthe.like).
4) An omitted assessment is property value that should have been included on a prior year's roll
but willbe included on the tax roll for which this worksheet has been prepared. Omits are
assessed and taxed atthe rate in effect for the year omitted (RCW 84.40.080-085).
5) Administrative refunds under RCW 84.69.020 were removed from the levy lid by the 1981
legislature.
6) A district is entitled to the lesser of the maximum levies determined by application ofthe
limit underRCW 84.55 and the statutory rate limit. Levies may be subject to further
proration if aggregate rate limits set in Article vn ofthe state constitution and in RCW
84.52.043 are exceeded.
7) This seCtion is provided for your information, and to assist in preparing any Increase
Ordinance that maybe required by RCW 84.55.120. The increase information compares the
aIlo.vable levy for the next tax year with your ACTUAL levy being collected this year. The
actual levy excludes any refund levy and expired temporary lid lifts, if applicable. New
construction, annexation and refund levies, as well as temporary lid lifts in their initial year,
are subtracted from this year's allowable levy before the comparison is made.
8) Assessed valuations shown are subject to change from error corrections and appeal board
decisions recorded between the date of this worksheet and final levy rate determination.
11/16/04 11:35AM
LevyLimitWS.doc
Finance and Safety Committee
November 1, 2004
Present:
Dave Fentou,Joan Hernandez, Dennis Robertson
Judge Kimberly Walden, Darlene Heskett, Alan Doerschel, Kevin Fuhrer, Peter
Beckwith, Rhonda Berry, Lucy Lauterbach; Walt Washington- Animal Control
1. Walt Washington. KinQ County Animal Control Dave noted the City pays $38,000 a year for
enhanced service from King county Animal ControL He wondered if the City was getting its
money's worth from the contracLDennisadded that he had an issue with how animal control applied
King County law whenTukwila law is more ,strict. He also said it's hard to reconstruct what
happened on calls, and trying totec:oncile the calls and the monthly reports is very difficult. Another
issue he pointed out was that people can't get hold of animal controL
Walt said barking dogs area low priority for response, and vicious dogs are a high priority. He said it
takes a largeamountoftime to coverTukwila, Bunen, White Center, and Skyway. Officer manage
both 9-1-1 animal service calls, and calls , from citizens. He said the unions have strict work rules,
and officers 'generally have four days on and four days off. With two shifts per day, Tukwila could
have up to four officers responding. With an aging work force, several animal control officers have
recently been unab leto work due.Jo illnesses and broken limbs. Since April he's had four of his
eighteen officers off work. He did say when a city and King County ordinance differ, officers
enforce the KingCounty law. He said that is something that could be worked out with Tukwila.
Dennis asked if people are contacted about the results ofa vicious dog complaint, and Walt said there
should be a phone call, if not a letter. 'Dave said Tukwila would work to dovetail our ordinance with
King County. Information.
2. Resolution Allowin!! EXDenseRecovervfor TVS Bonds Hugh Spitzer, the City's bond counsel,
has drafted a resolution that would allow the City to recover expenditures from TVS if we issued
bondsto pay for projects there. Alan said it allows us to capture costs as we get ready to spend money
there this year. Recommend Resohition to COW.
.
3. ' 2005 PrODertv T2.X Levy Th~' County Assessor requires a good deal of information from cities
before he gets them their allowed tax rate for the new year. Alan said he has submitted the necessary
information with an October 15 deadline letter, levy limit worksheet, and a blank ordinance with the
language required to enact the property tax increase. Because the County gets Alan the information
so late, he asked and got pennission from the Committee to bring the ordinance straight to Council
for adoption in November or December when it's ready. Send DroDertv tax ordinance to ReQular
MeetinQ when ready.
4. BudQet Review The Committee reviewed the budgets that will be discussed at Council that
evening. Police, Council, Mayor, Court, Finance, City Attorney, some Commissions, and Fund
D"la-c"'s 'W~-'" ...ll-;..Hl....H.~rl ""'av'" ...,,1......--1 ..t..~ O..h~.. ....."'.....1..0..,.. "'-b"''''' ,.."......p"'....;nn ti-.", ...i-.",,,,l"';n "'I'no
ua. 11 _.\; .\..fJ.\J.a. 1\...1v,,",vv,,",u.J..J ""'. ""..l\..""u. U.1""&'J.J.\",I'J. _U~"''''J..1U''''J.'':) U '-1\.1.&. ~y..P V.L"'" 1..5 t.i._ "'.I."''"''.,p....''''''... ....i L
serves the Police and Fire Departments. He said Sea Tac uses a foundation to support a chaplain. Joan
asked what expenses we'd be paying for. Dennis wanted to make sure we weren't crossing any
religion/government separation line. Dave will check with the other Council members to see ifthey
want to support this. Bud!!et review Dartiallv comDleted.,
. .;
1l rr) ! fJ.:\ "2 CJ
I r \ f
uu u.,
-- .' LJ
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, LEVYING THE GENERAL TAXES, FOR THE CITY OF
TUKWILA, INKING COUNTY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING
JANUARY 1, 2005, ON ALL PROPERTY, BOTH REAL AND PERSONAL, IN
SAIDCITl' Vv"HICH IS SUBjECT TO TAXATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF
PAYING SUFFICIENT REVENUE TO CARRY ON THE SERVICES OF THE
SEVERAL,DEP ARTMENTS OF SAID CITY FOR THE ENSUING YEAR AS
REQUIRED BYLAW; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila has considered the City's anticipated
financial requirements for 2005 and the amounts necessary and available to be raised by ad
valorerritaxeson real, personal and utility property; and
WHEREAS, the final assessed valuation calculation has been determined;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section1.Regular Tax Levy.
A. ,There shall be and hereby is levied on all real, personal, and utility property in the City
of Tukwila, in King County, whose estimated assessed valuation is $3,442,955,284, current taxes
for the ensuing year commencing January 2005, in the amount and at the rates specified below:
Rate Amount
Regular Tax Levy 3.13 10,800,000
B. The said taxes herein provided for are levied for the purpose of payment upon the
general bonded indebtedness of the City of Tukwila, the General Fund, and for the maintenance
of the departments of the municipal government of the City of Tukwila for the fiscal year
beginning January 1,2005.
Section 2. Collection. This ordinance shall be certified to the proper County officials, as
provided by law, and taxes here levied shall be collected to pay to the Finance Director of the
City of Tukwila at the time and in the manner provided by the laws of the State of Vvashington
for the collection of taxes for nonchartered code cities.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase
of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or
unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of
this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the
official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force and effect January 1, 2005.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a
Special Meeting thereof this day of , 2004.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Jane E. Cantu,CMC, City Clerk
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number:
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Office of the City Attorney
General Tax Levy 11/19/04
-
ByOrdinance2t520fthe Metropolitan King County Council,
Taxing Districts are required annually
to submit the, following information regarding their
tax levies for the ensuing year as cart of a
formalresolution of the District's governing body.
THE KING COUNTY ASSESSOR HAS NOTIFIED THE GOVERNING BODY OF
City, of ,Tukwila THAT THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF PROPERTY
LYING WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID DISTRICT FOR THE ASSESSMENT
YEAR 2004 IS:
$ 3,442,955,284
REGULAR (STATUTORY) LEVY (AS APPLICABLE):
EXPENSE FUND $
- TEMP. LID NAME $
-TEMP. LID NAME $
- TEMP. LID NAME $
RESERVE FUND $
OTHER (SPECIFY) , $
OTHER (SPECIFY) $
10,800,000
'-
EXgESS.(VOTERAPPROVED) LEVY:
(Please list authorized bond levies separately.)
G.O. BONDS FUND LEVY
G.O. BONDS FUND LEVY
G.O. BONDS FUND LEVY
$
$
$
SPECIAL LEVIES (INDICA tE PURPOSE AND DATE OF ELECTION AT
WHICH ,APPROVED):
$
$
TOT AL'TAXES REQUESTED:
$
10.800.000
THE ABOVE IS ATRUEAND COMPLETE US-TfNG OF LEVIES FOR SAID DISTRICT
FOR TAXYEAR 2005 AND THEY ARE WITHIN THE MAXIMUMS ESTABLISHED BY
LAW.
(AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE)
(DATE)
I~&F
LJ
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, INCREASING THE CITY OF TUKWILA REGULAR
LEVY FROM THE PREVIOUS YEAR, COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 2005,
ON ALL PROPERTY, BOTH REAL AND PERSONAL, IN COMPLIANCE
WITHRCW 84.55.120; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila has properly given notice of the public hearings held
on Novem.ber 22, 2004, to cOnsider the City's current revenues and expenses budget for the
2005calendar year, pursuant to RCW84.55.120; and
VvncREAS,the City, after hearing and duly considering all relevant evidence and
testimony presented, has determined that the City requires an increase in property tax
revenue nom the previous year, in addition to the increase resulting from the addition of
new construction and improvements to property and any increase in the value of State-
assessed property, in order to discharge the expected expenses and obligations of the City;
and.
WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is in its best interest and necessary to
meet its expenses and obligations for the property tax revenue to be increased for 2005, and
thefinal assessed valuation calculation has been determined;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An increase in the regular property tax levy, in addition to any amount
resulting nom the addition of new construction and improvements to property and any
increase in the value of state-assessed property, is hereby authorized for the 2005 levy in the
amount of $97,103, which is a percentage increase of .93 percent nom the previous year.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be
invalidoruncoristitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
$ection3. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in
the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force and effect
January 1,2005.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at aSpecial Meeting thereof this day of , 2004.
A TTESTj AUTHENTICATED:
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Jane E. Cantu, CMC,City Clerk
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number:
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Office of the City Attorney
Regular TaxLcvy Ilf19/04
.�IILA, COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
.�J �V 5 Initials ITEM NO.
o
i l P1t, %0 19 Meeting Date Prepared s review et iewV I Council r viey
a= m p I 11.22.04 I SL 'fl a�'�� I (-5/ H.
,,(P AKu I I I a, 1 I
O\
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 04-166 'ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: November 22, 2004
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Transit Oriented Development Area Conceptual Code Amendment to Allow Mixed Use
Residential Development
CATEGORY X Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Pub /ic Hearing Other
Altg Date 11.22.04 tldtg Date ;11tg Date Altg Date A'Itg Date t11tg Dale <11tg Date
SPONSOR Council IVlayor
Adrn Svcs X DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PW
SPONSOR'S Amending the Zoning Code to allow mixed use residential development adjacent to the Sounder Comuter Rail Station
SUMMARY in advance of TUC Plan approval will allow a proposed "pilot project" to move forward now. Conceptual approval
will allow staff to draft the amendments for review by the Planning Commission, followed by COW review and
Council Adoption.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. X CA &P Cmte El F &S Cmte El Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 11.09.04
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMiN. Recommend conceptual approval of amendment to Title 18.
COMMITTEE Support conceptual amendment and forward to COW
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURI REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
0 0 $0
Fund Source: N/A
Comments: Preparation of amendment can be completed in- house.
MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
11.22.04 Staff memo to COW RE: Code Amendment for TOD Area, November 16, 2004
11 -22 -04 Minutes from CAP Meeting November 9, 2004
11 -22 -04 Staff Memo to CAP RE: Code Amendment for TOD Area, Novemebr 4, 2004
City of TukWila
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Department of Community Development
Steve Lancaster, Director
TO:
From:
Date:
Committee()f the Whole , v-f./
Steve Lancaster, DCDDirector )(",......,
November 16,2004 --/
Subject:
Transit Oriented Development Area - Code Amendment to Allow Mixed Use
Res i dentialDevel opment
Back!!round
Recently, a developer approached DCD with a proposal for a mixed-use residential project, to be
constructed within the designated TaD area. Tukwila Station, a 350 unit multifamily
. development with 7,000 square feet of retail, would be located on the property north of
LongacresWay and the Sound Transit commuter rail/Amtrak station, between the UP and BNSF
fCtilroadtracks(See Figures 1&2). This ~~pilot" project would constitute a significant first step
towards achieving our lancluse and transportation goals for the TaD area and the TUC subarea
plan.
The project's primary obstacle is that residential development on this property is currently not
allowed by Tukwila's land use regulations. While the projectis consistent with pending
amendments to Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Plan and the proposed TUC subarea plan
allowing for the development of residential uses within walking distance of the Sound Transit
commuter rail/Amtrak station, it is being proposed prior to their adoption.
On November 9, the Community Affairs and Parks Committee supported the concept of
amending Chapter I 8, Tukwila Urban Cehter District, as follows to allow the project to move
forward:
Use:
Allow multifamilydwellingsin a mixed-use development on parcels within 200
,feet of Sound Transit's commuter rail property.
Conditional Use Perrnit and Design Review
TUC Basic Development Standards and General Design Review Criteria (since
the specific multifamily design'guidelines are for suburban versus urban forms of
development)
Process:
Standards:
Other provisions of Chapter 18, Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) District, will remain the same.
Outions:
1. Council,chooses hot to adopt the recommended amendments. The proposal would need to
wait until the TUC subarea plan is adopted in late 2005.
U">VVJVULILt:t:HLt::r~UULt:Va.ru,..>UtLC; rr 1 VV ".1 UKWLtd" rvdi>HIIll:$LUIl '/0100 . ,HUH/::; L.UU-<fJ1 -JU/ V . rdX; L.VU-<fJl -JUUJ
'.-,"'-,.;"".-: :
2. Council adopts therecommended amendments. The project can immediately move
forward.in the permit process.
Staff Recommendations:
Staffrecommendsthat the Committee of the Whole support the concept of amending Chapter 18,
TukwilaUrbanCenter (TUC) District. This allows staff to draft the amendments for review by
the Planning Commission, followed byC0W review and Council action.
Figure 1 Tukwila Station
A mixed used residential project for Pacific Commercial Properties
tl�tll!�Illmlrtlitltltlp'k
4l111113INIn(
r 4.
I(IIIII11II:IiII1)IIIIF)
nillli'w_i YImNiIOm9iii�
Atchlechje & Plarwng
rma
Rutledge Maul Architects P.S. Inc.
19330 47th Ave. N.E.
Seattle. WA 98155
(205)440.0330 FAX 3024381
Fwe. Z
TUKWILA STATION
A mixed used residential project
for Pacific Commerical Properties
4 C IC If' IC
South Elevation
001 13. 2m4
Community and Parks Committee
November 9,2004
Present: Pam Linder, (:hair; Dave Fenton, Joe Duffie
Jack Pace, Lynn Miranda, Bruce Fletcher, Kevin Fuhrer, Alan Doerschel, Lucy
'., 1/ Lauterbach
7",-1. Transit Oriented DevelonmeDtStaffhadmet with a developer who is interested in building
a 350 unit residential building, with room for retail on the first floor just north of the Sounder
. Station. As this is inthe TransitOriented Development (TOD) area, residential uses are not now
allowed there. The TukwilaUrban Center Plan is not due until late 2005, so amendments to the
Tukwila Urban Center section in Chapter l8 could be coupled with the Comprehensive Plan
provisions toallowthedevelopmentto work toward getting a permit. Jack said staff had tried to
think ofa way to aid this development, as it brings us toward our goal of enhancing the TOD to
make it a viable living and working area. The developer has an option of buying land from
McCleod. The Committee supported moving to adopt an amendment to the Tukwila Urban
Center uses by a116wingmultifamily dwellings ina mixed use development on parcels within
200 feet of Sound Transit's commuter rail property. If approved in concept by the Council, it will
go to the Planning Commission. Recommend amendment to Nov 22 meetine.
2. Park and EauiomentAcceotance Bruce had used some 2004 CDBG funds to buy
replacement playgroundequipmentforboth Crystal Springs and Duwamish park. New swings
and the new stylejunglegyms were installed at Duwamish Park for a total of$38,976.78. The
total forthe Crystal Springs project was $49,153.07. Recommend acceotance of both
contracts and release of retainaee to consent aeenda.
3. Final Budeet lleviewThe Committee completed their committee budget reviews. The
~ommittee discussed possible proactive code enforcement using the international property
maintenance code to strengthen and upgrade both single family and multi family hOlJsing. This
item will be discussed at Council's retreat. Budeet review finished.
4. Third OuarterRenorts Committee members were satisfied with the reports. No action.
tS L'Committee chair approval
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Depa. tUtent of Community Detlelopment
Steve Lancaster, Director
TO:
From:
Date:
Community Affairs and Parks Committee Members
Steve Lancaster, DCD Director
Novernber4, 2004
Subject:
Transit Oriented Development Area- Code Amendmentto Allow Mixed Use
Residential Development
Backe:round
Recently, a developer approached DCDwith a proposal for a mixed-use residential project, to be
constructed within the designated TOD area. Tukwila Station, a 350 unit multifamily
development with 7,000 square feet of retail, would be located on the property north of
Longacres Way and the Sound Transit commuter rail/Amtrak station, between the UP and BNSF
railroad tracks (See Figures 1&2). This "pilot" project would constitute a significant first step
towards achieving our land use and transportation goals for the TOD area and the TUC subarea
plan. The project's primary obstacle is that residential development on this property is currently
not allowed by Tukwila's land use regulations. This memo outlines Staff recommendations that
willallo'N the City to capturethis key development opportunity now, prior to the adoption of the
TUC subarea plan.
. Discussion
Policy issues that need to be addressed are as follows:
. Residentialdevelopmenton the property is currently not allowed by Tukwila's land use
regulations.
. The project is consistent with pending amendments to Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use
Plan and the proposed TUCsubareaplall allowing for the development ofresidentiaJ usee;
within walking distance of the Sound Transit commuter rail/Amtrak station.
. The project is being proposed prior to adopting Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Plan
amendments andthe TUC subarea plan.
Staff recommends amending Chapter 18,Tukwila Urban Center District, as follows to allow the
project to move forward:
Use:
Allowmultifamily dwellings ina mixed-use development on parcels within 200
feet of Sound Transit's commuter rail property.
Conditional Use Permit andDesign Review
TUC Basic Development Standards and General Design Review Criteria (since
the specific multifamily design guidelines are for suburban versus urban forms of
development)
Process:
Standards:
u.)uu ,.;WUUl(;."t:;/tLt:/'DUULI:;V(1IU, vULLf{tt1 VV -1UJ\.VVLta, YVi:1.:i/ttlt15LVIL '/0100' - nwltt;; ~UU-'fJ1 -JU/ V - rd}(; ~UU-'fJ1 -JUUJ
,.-, ---'-.-. .-.- ".--': -,'
" ..-. -. .." .
- . _"->_ _~>- ' -~..,
Other provisions ofChapter18,TukwilaUrban Center (TUC) District, will remain the same.
ODtions '
1. Council choosesnottoadopt therecommended amendments. The proposal would need to
. wait until the TUC subareaplanis adopted in late 2005.
2. Council adopts the recommended amendments. The project can immediately move
forward in the pertnitprocess.
Staff Recommendations:
AmendChapterl8, Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) District, as described, to allow the proposed
project to move forward.
Next steps:
Forward the proposed amendment on to the COW for review at their November 22nd meeting. If
the COW agrees with Staff recommendations, Staff will draft the actual amendments for review
by the Planning Commission, followed by COW review and Council adoption.
Figure 2 Tukwila Station
Figure 1 Tukwila Station
--, D) f7\
[I I .j~U:' Il\ \
..:J Lr"d
-;J L,J
r l
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY OF
TUKWILA'S ZONING MAP FROM LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(LDR) TO MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIAL CENTER/LIGHT
(MICjL) AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE WESTERN
TERMINUS OF SOUTH 126TH STREET AND BETWEEN TUKWILA
INTERNATIONAL BOULEVARD AND 34TH AVENUE SOUTH;
PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN
, EFFECTIVE DATE.
.'
WHEREAS, in 1995 the City of Tukwila adopted the Zoning Map, based on
consideration of existing conditions and long-term community-wide goals, and these
policies may bereviewed, and updated as appropriate; and
WI-lEREAS, Sabey Corporation has requested amendments to the Zoning Map for
the property located at the western terminus of South 126th Street and between
TukwilaInternational Boulevard and 34th Avenue South; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on March 15, 2004, and
forwarded the Sabey Corporation's request for rezone to the City of Tukwila Planning
Commission for further review; and
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila Planning Commission, after having received and
studied staff analysis and comments from members of the public at a public hearing
held on May 20,2004, recommended denial of the applicant's request for the rezone;
and
vvtiEREAS, fue City Council has held its own duly advertised public hearings on
the aforementioned request, at which time the Council took testimony including all
written and oral comments, statements and arguments submitted tothe Council; and
'.
WHEREAS, the City Council evaluated this rezone request based on the analysis
contained within the staff memo to the Council dated August 10,2004, which included
four staff reports to the Planning Commission as exhibits dated March 15, 2004, May 20,
2004, June 16, 2004 and July 14, 2004, which are hereby incorporated by this reference;
and
WHEREAS, this rezone request is in conformity with the adopted Comprehensive
Land Use Policy PI!:1n, Tukwila Municipal Code Title 18, and the puhlic interest; and
WHEREAS, this rezone request is supported by an architectural site plan showing
the proposed development and its relationship to the surrounding areas; and
WHEREAS, this rezone request meets the criteria for granting zoning map
reclassifications listed under Tukwila Municipal Code 18.84.030; and
'.AmendZo11U1g:.:>abey 1l/19/U41'age 1 of 2
WHEREAS,the Committee of the Whole, after due consideration, and after taking
public testimony at the public hearing held on October 4, 2004, believes that certain
amendments to the City's Zoning Map are necessary;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUIG\TILA,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Zoning Map change set forth in Section 2 of this ordinance is found
to be necessary and desirable for the reasons presented in staff reports, previously
referenced,. and at, public hearings. The City Council specifically finds that the
proposed zone change conforms to all relevant criteria set forth in TMC 18.84.030.
Section 2. The City's Zoning Map is hereby amended to designate the entire parcel
#740600602, ,generally located at the western terminus of South 126th Street and
between Tukwilalnternational Boulevard and 34th Avenue South, as Manufacturing
Industrial CenterjLight, , rather than having split zoning designations of Low-Density
Residential" Commercial Light Industrial, and Manufacturing Industrial Center jLight,
as shown on Exhibit A.
Section3. TheZoning Map change shall be allowed upon approval and execution
of the Covenant attached hereto as Exhibit B, which Covenant is incorporated herein as
part of Uli&ol'diHiUlLeby ihisreferellCe, and ..11 Jeveiopment of Ule site by me appiicani:
or its successors in interest shall be in strict conformity with the provisions of Exhibit B.
Any change in the provisions of Exhibit B shall require rezone proceedings.
Section 4. In the event that the property is developed in violation of the Covenant
attached hereto as Exhibit B, said Covenant shall be deemed null and void and the
zoning designation for the property shall revert to the zoning designations which
existed prior to the date of adoption of this ordinance.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published
in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days
after passage and publication as provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Special Meeting thereof this day of . 2004.
ATTEST j AUTHENTICATED:
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Jane E.Cantu, CMC, CityClerk
Office of the City Attorney
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number:
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
;-;:;(;/~"-~ P::-,8';-:" ") nf?
~-,.~." -:'_'--_' - FCo- ,.~" -' .
Subject property (Parcel 73406-0602) zoning designation for the entire
parcel is cflangedtoMIC/L
\11 CI _
I
r-_u_. ._.
I
,
I
I
I
.
!
:~
N
50
, . .
1 (\f)1:" cu;:)t
~ '.-,-.>,.;.' ";\ -~ '..--' ~.
~
T
s. 126th st.
--.----.----
EXHIBIT A
...-- - ,- --.-- ----..-- _...-
CONCOMITANT AGREEMENT AND
COVENANT RUNNING WITH THE LAND
This agreement. is entered, into this day of
2004, by and between International Gateway East III, LLC, a Washington limited
liability company,hereinafter referred to as the" Applicant" and the City of Tukwila,
Washington, a municipaLcorporatiori,hereinafter referred to as the "City."
, WHEREAS, the City has authority to enact laws and to enter into agreements to
promote the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens and thereby control the
development of property within its jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has applied for a rezone of certain property described
below within the, City'sjurisdictionfrom LDR district to C/U district, consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan adopted by the City pursuant to the Growth Management Act
(RCW36.70A); and
WHEREAS, the City and the Applicant are both interested in complying with the
ordinances of the City of Tukwila relating to the development of the property situated
in the City described as follows:
Lots 1,2 and 3 in Block120f Riverton Addition, as per the Plat recorded in
Volume 13 of Plats, Page 36 records of King County, Washington, together with
the entire 40 foot width of vacated South 126th Street adjacent and contiguous
thereto (also being known as Lot C of Boundary Line Adjustment Number 89-
6-BLA, recorded un.der King County Recording Number 8908161260), situated
in the City of Tukwila, County. of King, State of Washington.
hereinafter sometimes referred to as the "Site"; and
WHEREAS, the City desires toeIlforce the rights and interests of the public by this
Concomitant Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in the event the site is rezoned from LDR to MIC/L district,
the Applicant covenants to the City and agrees on behalf of itself and each of its
successors and assigns, that during the entire period that the property is zoned MIC/L,
the Site will be developed only in accordance with this Covenant and subject to the
conditions provided herein. The Applicant specifically agrees that this Covenant
touches, concerns, enhances, benefits and runs with the property.
1. Title., Applicant is the sole and exclusive owner of the property.
2. Conditions. The Applicant promises to comply with all the terms and
conditions, of this agreement in the event the City, as full consideration herein, grants
the rezone relating to the Site. The Applicant hereby agrees to be bound by and to
comply with the following conditions:
Concomitant Sabey 11/18/04 Page 1 of 3
EXHIBITB
-.;.-..:.:," ,'..' . . ,--->,;- ','
a; The Applicant shall install ten Douglas Fir trees that are 12 to 14 feet in
height and five Douglas Fir ,trees that are 6 to 8 feet in height, along the south property
line as shown in the clouded area on the attached Exhibit 1. The fifteen Douglas Fir trees
shall be,. installed within '180 .'days of, the. approval of this agreement. All other
landscaping shown on Exhibit I, except the fifteen Douglas Fir trees, was approved as
part of theConq.itionalUse Permit (File Number L02-055) and Design Review
Application (File Number,L02-056) for the Department of Homeland Security building
by the Planning Commission on February 27,2003. Also, prior to the approval of this
agreement,theapplicantshalLprovide a performance bond or other financial security as
approved by the City Attorney, guaranteeing the completion of such improvements.
b. No access to the site Will be allowed from 34th Avenue South.
c. All uses of this ,property shall be consistent with zoning designation
MIC/L.
3. Binding. No modifications of this agreement shall be made unless mutually
agreed upon by the parties in writing.
4. Remedies. Violations of this Covenant shall be enforced by the City according
to ertforcementproceduresapplicableto zoning code violations. In addition to other
remedies available to the City by law, the City reserves the right to revoke the rezoning
of the Site should the Applicant fail to comply with any of the to;;HUS and conditions of
this agreement.
5. Successors.., This Covertant'.shall,remain in full force and effect, and be
binding upon the Owner and his successors and assigns until amended, modified or
~o;;Huinated by an ordinance adopted by the Tukwila City Council.
6. Filing. The' applicant shall file' a copy of this covenant for record with the
King County Records and Elections Division within 30 days of approval of this
agreement so as to appear within the chain of title to the property.
7. Reversion. In the event that the property is developed in violation of the
conditions set forthin this agreement, then this covenant shall be deemed null and void
and the zoningdesignationfor the property shall revert to tl1e zoning designations that
existed prior to the rezone contemplated herein.
8. Attomey.Fees. . In the event that, legal action is instituted to enforce or
interpret any provision of this Covenant,including any appeal thereof, the substantially
losing party 'shall reimburse the substantially prevailing party for all costs and
reasonable attorney fees incurred in connection therewith.
9. Severability. In the eventthat any tt::HU or clause of this agreement conflicts
with applicable law, such conflict shall not affect other terms of this agreement, which
canbe given effecfwithoutthe conflicting terms or clause, and to this end, the terms of
this agreement are declared to be severable.
ConcomitaI1t ~abeY/111181Mpage2of3
, .."...." "";'" ' , ,'...,.. "
EXHlI:UT H
IN WITNESS WHEREOF; the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of
the day and year firstabovewritlen.
APPLICANT
International Gateway:EastIII, LLC,
By Sabey Corporation Manager
CITY OF TUKWILA
By James N.Harmon, Treasurer&Secretary
By Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Shelley Kerslake, City Attorney
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) 5$.
)
I certify that I know orhave satisfactory evidence that Tames N. Harmon to me known to be
the Treasurer & Secretary of the corporation which executed the above instrument, appeared
before me and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument and acknowledged it
to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this
instrument.
DATED:
By
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Name as cormnissioned:
Residing at:
My commission expires:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
)
) 55.
)
I certify that lknow- or have satisfactory evidence that Steven M. Mullet. Mavor. City of
Tukwila, appeared before me and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument and
acknowledged it to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes
mentioned in this instrument.
DATED:
By
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Name as commissioned:
Residing at:
My commission expires:
ConcomiIllJ.1t Sabeylli18i04rag~ 30! 3
EXHiB11~ 11
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials
ITEM NO.
.r; P 1 �,t�� j Meeting Date 1, Prepared by I Mayor's review 1 Council review 1
a 11/22/04 RT I
rso$ I I I I
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 04-012 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 2/2/04
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Tukwila International Blvd Phase 2 3 Scope and Budget Alternatives
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 11122/04
SPONSOR Council El Mayor Adm Svcs DCD El Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PTV
SPONSOR'S The City has received additional federal grant funds and working with WSDOT to receive
SUMMARY state funds from the "nickel package The new scope of work with these funds include
undergrounding, illumination and sidewalks. Question is to design the roadway with full
10' sidewalks (6' concrete 4' planter) for the length of the project or reduce to 8'
sidewalk sections with no planters where necessary.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte El F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
El Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 11/8/04
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Provide direction on desired scope of project
CommirrEE Recommend 8' sections forward to COW for discussion
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED CITY FUNDS REQUIRED
$16.15 million $16.2 million $2,430,000
Fund Source: 104.02 Commercial Streets (page 44 45, 2005 CIP)
Comments: City Funds also includes $225, 000 from 412 Surface Water for the High Flow Bypass (pg 125 Prpsd 2005 CIP)
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
Complete roadway from S 138 St north to Sabey development
Budget restrictions limited scope to not include undergrounding
11/22/04 1
MTG. DATE I ATTACHMENTS
11/22/04 Information Memo dated November 3, 2004
Spreadsheets on Scope and Budget Alternatives
Transportation Committee Meeting Minutes from November 8, 2004
. INFORMATION MEMO
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor Mullet
Public Works Director
N ovemberJ, 2004
TukwilaInternational Blvd - Phases 2 & 3 (S 116 tb St toS 138tb St)
Scope, and Budget Alternatives
Project No. 95..RW03
ISSUE
Present scope' alternatives based on updated funding and ,potential funding, from WSDOT.
BACKGROUND
This project was presented to the Transportation Committee in February 2003 where project
limits were discussed. Thereslllting consensus was the preference to camplete roadway
improvements from the ,north limit of Phase 1 (S 13Stb St) to' as far north as possible with the
available funding (just north of the Sabeydevelapment). This would eliminate having a "gap"
in, improvements where" Phase' 3 is currently identified.
In January 2004, scope and budget alternatives were presented to the City Council for
discussion regarding the available budget (at that time) campared with the estimated
canstruction costs. far three different alternatives (see attached spreadsheet). The Council
provided directionontheir preferred scope items. Staff has since prepared 30% design plans
that have been reviewed by .a Value, Engineering team.
The, City ,has subsequently applied for and received additianal federal grant funds for
constructian of the praject. Staff is also warking with WSDOT to transfer state funds to the
City's project from a "Nickel Package"praject that is identified within the City's project
limits .
KPO, Inc., is under contract with the City to design Phase 2 of T .I.B. improvements. They
have developed revised scope and budget alternatives far the project limits fram S 13Stb St to S
116tb 8t based on the currently anticipated funding scenario. The estimated casts with
descriptions of included and excluded scope items are shown in an attached spreadsheet.
ANALYSIS
All alternatives are based on the same project limits from S 13Stb St to S 116tb St. The new
scopes and estimated costs are based on: 1) the original information developed within the
design report including the scope items desired from input by the City Council and 2) the
current secured funding and the anticipated state funds. The description shown for each
funding alternative identifies both 'included and excluded scope items for that particular
alternative.
Mayor Muliet
Page 2
November 3, 2004
RECOMMENDATION
Discuss the alternatives presented and provide direction to staff on desired scope items in
order to proceed with final design of improvements.
Funding Source
Preliminary Engineering.
State Transportation Improvem.entBoard
Federal Hwy TEA-21.Grant
State DOT Funds
Construction
State Transportation Impr()vement Board
Federal Hwy TEA-21 Grant
State "Nickel Package" Funds
TukwilaCityRevenue{104&412 Funds)
Total
Total
$ 660,000.00
440,000.00
400,000.00
$1,500,000.00
$4,200,000.00
6,681,008.00
2,900,000.00
2,430,000.00
$16,211,008.00
attachments:SCQpe and Budget Alternatives (from November 2004)
Scope and Budget Alternatives (from January 2004)
(P:ProjeclS\A- RW & RS ProjeclS\9SRW03 TIB2\Memo phase 2 AIlS - Round 2)
New $400,000
New $2,995,020
New $2,900,000
Tukwila International Boulevard, Phase 2 and 3
South 139th Street to South 116th Street
Scope and Budget Alternatives
i'onsinc
meets,: Phase-2 and 3 combined
ithir
$�1615�Milhon.
10'Sidewalkkwith Planters and.
8' ,sidewalk at certain locations
Underground all aerial utilities
-Seattle City Light to pay for any expansion
New Illumination system
- Pedestrian lighting only at key locations
10' Sidewalk with Planters
Underground all aerial utilities
- Seattle City Light to pay for any expansion
New Illumination system
- Pedestrian lighting only at key locations
Pedestrian Illumination
-$50,000 to $100,000
5 lane roadway section,
- Transition to 4 lane section at Southgate and
Riverton Creek crossings to reduce wall costs
Reduce sidewalk to 8' with no planters in some
locations to reduce wall costs.
10' = 6' Sidewalks with 4' Planters
(Preserve existing sidewalks)
5 lane roadway section,
-Transition to 4 lane section at Southgate and
Riverton Creek crossings to reduce wall costs
10' = 6' Sidewalks with 4' Planters
(Preserve existing sidewalks)
Landscaping
- $200,000 to $300,000
Bus Pullouts with Bus Shelters
- 4 Locations
Provide medians where left turn access
is not required
Curb or planter separation for
pedestrian connection to the Green River Trail
Bus Pullouts with Bus Shelters
- 4 Locations
Provide medians where left turn access
is not required
Curb or planter separation for
pedestrian connection to the Green River Trail
Bus Shelters
- $45,000 to $180,000
Cross WSDOT Ramp and continue
sidewalk along West side of TIB
- $30,000 to $50,000
Current Project In formation - November 2004
Tukwila International Boulevard, Phase 2 and 3
South 139th Street to South 116th Street
Scope and Budget Alternatives
December 12, 2003
Comparison of major scope items for 3 different funding scenarios - Phase 2 and 3 combined
Original design report scope
$19.5 M +
Current Funding
$9.5 Million
Funding with WSDOT contribution
$12.8 Million
Underground all aerial utilities
New Illumination system
(Owned and maintained by City) '
5 lane roacway section
4' planters with 8' sidewalks, both sides
Provide medians where left turn access
is not required
4' planter with 8' sidewalk on west side for
pedestrian connection to the Green River Trail
No undergrounding - pole relocations only
Illumination on relocated utility poles
(Owned and maintained by Seattle City Light)
Transition to 4 lane section at Southgate and
Riverton Creek crossings to reduce wall costs
Typically 4' planters with 6' sidewalks,
reduce to 6' sidewalk and no planter in some
locations to reduce wall costs
Minimal medians
Use roadway shoulder for pedestrian
connection to Green River Trail
No undergrounding - pole relocations only
Budget would allow a new illumination system
(Owned and maintained by City)
5 lane roadway section
4' planters with 6' sidewalks, both sides
Provide medians where left turn access
is not required
Curb or planter separation for pedestrian
connection to Green River Trail
Previously Submitted - January 2004
"
Transportation Committee
November 8, 2004
Present:
JoanlIernandez, Chair; Pam Carter, Joe Duffie
Pat Brodin, Robin Tischmak, Jim Morrow, Kevin Fuhrer, Alan Doerschel, Frank
Iriarte, Gail Labanara, Lucy Lauterbach
1. Interurban Avenue South Design Thecityhas received a $396,000 federal grant for funding
the design of road improvements on Intemrban Avenue S. from 143rd to Fort Dent "Vay. After
interviewing five of the fourteen firms that were interested, staff chose KPG by a wide margin.
They scored higher than other companies on every rating criterion. The design and engineering
costs of $434,710.24 are within the, project budget, although Joan noticed that in the CIP there is
not money for constmctionuntil after 2010. She asked if the design work being done now would
still be useful if construction didn't occur until that many years ahead, and Jim assured her it
wQuld;The Comrpitteeapproved the scope of work that was included.. Authorize mayor to
si2'llcontract with KPG for design services for Interurban.
2. SouthcenterParkwav Extension Supplement David Evans already has a $35l ,000 contract
to design the extension of South center Parkway to the south city limits. Additional design work
is needed for thesewerline from Minkler to S. 200th and the additional 1,400 feet of roadway to
reach the city'ssouthernboundary,soa supplement to the contract has been prepared. Segale did
some preliminary designwork on the sewer, but the majority of design still remains to be done.
A supplement has beennegotiated in the amount of $70,615, and is within budget. Advertising
for construction is included in the work. Jim said the City cannot afford to build the road or
sewer withoutbonds;iand we couldn't pay the bond payments with()ut assistance from the TVS
project. Pam pointed outthat the only reason forthe sewer project is to serve the TVS project.
The seWer money is within the S. 180th Street project in the CIP. Recommend authorizin!!
mavortosi2'n sUODlement for extension.
.~
3. TukwilalnternationalBoulevard (TIB) Phases 2 and 3 of the TIB project were previously
discussed in late 200Jandearly 2004, but there was not enough money to do both phases, so the
southern section thatwould continue the previous improvements north, had been chosen. Since
the first oftheyeartheCjtyhas received more funding, and is now able to do both phases, if
some savings are found. The Committee considered the$16.5m and $16.15m versions and
recommended the $16.15 million dollar version, and also considered other savings that could be
made if necessary. Move discussion to CO\V,
4. Cascade View Park Cascade View Community,Park constmction is complete, and the city is
ready to release theretainage of the contractor. Though the contract was largely done in 2003,
there were a number of landscape issues that have remained open. Those are now resolved, and
the.proj~ct can be closedouLJoan asked what the $8,571.20 cost overruns were for and ....vas
informed they were partly for gravel, asphalt and the sidewalk extension. Recommend Droiect
accentance and release of retainage to consent agenda of a Regular Meeting.
.~::-
COUNCIL AGENDA Swosis
J�f' wg s y Init ITEM No.
�1�,��� Meeting Date 1 Prepared by 1 Mayorr,.teview 1 Council review
a r 2 11/22/04 1 RT_< tYh L 7I,W 11
��t` U I
rsos 1 1 1
1 1 1
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 04-167 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 2004
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Interurban Ave South Consultant's Agreement with KPG Inc.
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 11 /22/04
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police ®PW/
SPONSOR'S The contract is for the engineering design services for the roadway improvements on
SUMMARY Interurban Ave South from S 143 St to Fort Dent Way. The roadway improvements
include minor widening, adding curb, gutter and sidewalks on both sides of the street,
utility undergrounding, storm drainage and slope stabilization.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 11/8/04
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Authorize Mayor to sign agreement with KPG Inc.
COMMI Approve agreement and forward to COW and then Regular Council
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED CITY FUNDS REQUIRED
$434,671.00 $458,000.00 $62,000
Fund Source: 104.02 Commercial Streets (page 44 2004 CTP)
Comments: Federal Hwy Surface Transportation Program grant of $396,000.
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
11/22/04
NI TG. DATE ATTACH'
I I M. r1 IVI C IV I S
11/22/04 1 Information Memo dated November 3, 2004 (revised from 11/8 TC)
Consultant Selection
Consultant's Agreement with Exhibits
Transportation Committee Meeting Minutes from November 8, 2004
1
From:
Mayor Mullet
Public Works Director
November 3, 2004
Interurban AvtmueSouth - S 143rd St to Fort Dent Wav,
Consultant Selection and Contract Scope & Fee Estimate
To:
Date:
Subject:
ISSUE
Approve the Consultant selection and authorize the Mayor to execute a contract in the amount of
$434,671.00 to provide engineering design services for roadway improvements on Interurban
Avenue SouthfromS 143rd St to Fort Dent Way.
BACKGROUND
The City has received Federalgrantfunding for the design of roadway improvements on
Interurban Avenue South from S 143rd 8tto Fort Dent Way. The process of selecting a
ConsultanUo provide engineering designservices included soliciting written proposals and
follow-up interviews with the finns that scored the best on the proposals. Fourteen (14)
proposals were received and five (5) firms were interviewed.
ANALYSIS
Of the five firms interviewed, KPG, Inc., was rated the highest by the selection panel. KPG, Inc.,
demonstrated that they possess the expertise to provide quality design services for th,is project.
A scope ofwork fu'1d fee estimate has been prepared by KPG, Inc., to provide the preliminary
engineering as requested by the City. The design fee is within the project budget. The project
budget includes a federal grant in the amount of$396,000.
Contract amount has been revised since presented to Transportation Committee. The
contract has been reduced from $434,710.24 to $434,671.00 due to a mathematical error.
Preliminary Engineering
Contract
$434,671.00
Budget
$458,000
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the selection ofKPG, Inc., and authorize the Mayor to execute a contract to provide
engineering design services for Interurban Avenue South in the amount of $434,671.00.
attachments: Consultant Rating Fonn
Scope and Fee Estimate
(P:ProjectslA- RW & RS Projectsl03R W021consult select memo)
INTERURBAN'AVENUE SOUTH
S143RD SrTO FORT DENT WAY
Consultant Selection
Approach to Completing 'Objectives
13
Discuss Storm Drainage Issues
13
12
Environmental Process
27
Project Team
15
Similar Project Experience
15
Special Consideration
7
13
12
12
25
13
12
6
TOTALS
. 102 I 93
Highest total score is best.
10
13
12
21
10
8
6
80
10
11
10
20
10
10
4
75
9
7
6
18
10
10
2
62
LocalAgency ,
Standard Consultant
Agreement
Agreement Number
. _...~..--_.._.' .~----- '--
.-..,.....--.........-"-.....
Federal Aid Number
..' _, ~." ",~,.", n, ~ ,_,_, _,_," "'_'_'_"~"'~_>'_
Agreement Type (Choose one)
o Lump Sum
Lump'Sum Amount, $
-..---,--. --.....,. ..~ ..
~ Cost Plus Fixed Fee
Overhead Progress Payment Rate
Overhead Cost Method
D Actual Cost
OActual Cost Not To Exceed
153.8%
-~..._._-- '.~-...-
%
~- _... -'-.-_._---- -~'. -_..~.
~ Fixed Rate
Fixed Fee, $ 28,823.00
o Specific Rates Of Pay
D Negotiated Hourly Rate
D provisional Hourly Rate
153,8 %
o Cost Per Unit of Work
Consultan U Addressrr elephone
KPG, Inc
753 9th Avenue
Seattle, W A 98109
206-286-1640
.---..-.-.--.-...0---....-.- ________,. ___ _~_______..__
.._ .___. ......___..._.... ~__hw'.__~~..
Project Title And Work Description
City ofTukwila
Interurban Boulevard
S l43rd Streetto Fort Dent Way
Prepare plans, specifications and estimates
_._--~--------_..__._- ...-
DBE Participation
D Yes ~ No
%
WBE Participation
DYes ~No
%
~----- -~------
.-.--- ------.-... ~-.-- .--_...
FederallD Number or Social Security Number
91-1477622
_'-..._..._....__........__. h._.
Do you require a10g9 for IRS?
DYes D No
Completion Date
December 31, 2005
_.._-,,---~_._-...--,_._.~
Total Amount Authorized $
434,671.00
-~_.._._--~_..._..~._--
Management Reserve Fund $
---,..-~_._.__._.~--- -._-- .----.-- .-._.-...-...
Maximum Amount Payable $
434,671.00
-_.._._~.._---~-------_.._._-.-
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
-------.. -- -.. ----~._._-----.
between the Local Agency of City ofTukwila , Washington, hereinafter called the
._~ ~__~,. _",_,.,,_o_~_ "_~_..,_____._.~.'__~,,_,__.__,._..~___.__.._,
"AGENCY" ,and the above organization hereinafter called the "CONSULTANT".
WITNESSETHTHA T:
WHEREAS, the AGENCY desires to accomplish the above referenced project, and
WHEREAS, the AGENCY does not have sufficient staff to' meetthe required commitment and therefore
deems it advisable and desirable to engage the assistance of a CONSULTANT to provide the necessary
services for the PROJFCT;and
WHEREAS, the CONSULTANT represents that he/she is in compliance with the Washington State
Statutes relating to professional registration, if applicable, and has signified a willingness to furnish
Consulting services to the AGENCY,
NOW THEREFORE:, in consideration of the terms,conditions, covenants and performance contained
herein,or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, the parties hereto agree as follows:
DOT Form 140-089 EF
Revised 12199
Pa(je10f8
I
GENERALDESCRIPT ION OF WORK
All reports, PS&E materials, and other data, furnished
to the CONSULTANT by the AGENCY shall be
returned. All designs, drawings, specifications,
documents, and other work products prepared by the
CONSULTANT prior to completion or termination of
this AGREEMENT are instruments of service for this
PROJECT and are property of the AGENCY. Reuse
by the AGENCY or by others acting through or on
behalf of the AGENCY of any such instruments of
service, not occurring as a part of this PROJECT,
shall be without liability or legal exposure to the
CONSULTANT.
The work under this AGREEMENT shall consist of
the above described work and servicesas herein
defined and necessary to accomplish thecompleted
work for this PROJECT The CONSUL TANTshall
furnish all services, labor and related equipment
necessary to conduct and complete the work as
designated elsewhere in thisAGREEMENT
1\
SCOPE OF WORK
The Scope of Work and projectlevel of effort for this
projectis detailed in Exhibit"B" attached hereto, and
by this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT
IV
TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COM PLETION
11\
GENERAL REQUIREM ENTS
The CONSULTANT shall not begin any work under
the terms of this AGREEMENT until authorized in
writing by the AGENCY. All work under this
AGREEMENT shall be completed by the date
shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT under
completion date.
All aspects of coordination of the work of this
AGREEMENT, with outside agencies, groups or
individuals shall receive advance approval by the
AGENCY. Necessary contacts and meetings with
agencies, groups or individuals shall be coordinated
through the AGENCY. .
The established completion time shall not be extended
because of any delays attributable to the CONSUL T-
ANT, but may be extended by the AGENCY, in the
event of a delay attributable to the AGENCY, or
because of unavoidable delays caused by an act of
GOD or governmental actions or other conditions
beyond the control of the CONSUL T ANT. A prior
supplemental agreement issued by the AGENCY is
required to extend the established completion time.
The CONSULTANT shall attend coordination,
progress and presentation meetings with the
AGENCY 9f such Federal, Community, State, City
or County officials, groups or indiViduals as may be
requested by the AGENCY. The AGENCY will
provide the CONSULTANT sufficient notice prior
to meetings requiring CONSULTANT participation.
The minimum number of hours or days notice -
required shall be agreed to between the AGENCY
and the CONSULTANT and shown in EXhibit"B"
attached hereto and made part of this AGREEMENT.
The CONSULTANT shall prepare amonthly
progress report, in a form approved by the AGENCY,
thatwill outline in written and graphical form the
various phases and the order of performance of the
work in sufficient detail so thatthe progress of the
work can easily be evaluated. Goals forOisadvan-
taged Business Enterprises (DBE) and Women
Owned Business Enterprises (WBE) if required shall
be shown in the heading of this AGREEMENT
V
PAYMENT
The CONSULTANT shall be paid by the AGENCY
for completed work and services rendered under this
AGREEMENT as provided in Exhibit "C" attached
hereto, and by this reference made part of this
AGREEMENT. Such payment shall be full compen-
sation for work performed or services rendered and
for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and
incidentals necessary to complete the work
specified in Section II, "Scope of Work". The
CONSULTANT shall conform with all applicable
portions of 48 CFR 31.
. .:. -~ -.--' >.-., '" --'
Page2of8
VI
SUBCONT RACTING
The AGENCY permits subcontraCts for those Items
of work as shown in Exhibit G to this Agreement.
Compensation for this subconsultant work shall. be
based on the cost factors shown on Exhibit G, at-
tached hereto and by this reference made a part of this
AGREEMENT.
The work of the subconsultant shall not exceed its
maximum amount payable unless a priorwritten
approval has been issued by the AGENCY.
AI! reimbursable direct labor, overhead, direct non-
salary costs and fixed fee costs for the subconsultant
shall be substantiated in the same ,manner as outlined
in Section V All subcontracts exceeding $10,000 in
cost shall contain all applicable provisions of this
AGREEMENT.
The CONSULTANT shall not subcontrac;tfor the
performance of any work under this AGREEMENT
without prior written permission of the AGENCY. No
permission for subcontractingshall create, between
the AGENCY and subcontractor, any contract or any
other relationship:
VII
EMPLOYMENT
The CONSULTANT warrants that he/she has not
employed or retained any company or person,other
than a bona fide employee working solely for the
CONSULTANT, to solicit or tecurc t~js contract, and
that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or
person, other than a bona fide employee working
solely for the CONSULTANT, any fee, commission,
percentage,brokE3rage fee" gift, or any other consider-
ation. contingent upon or resulting. from the award or
making of this contract.' For breach or violation of this
warrant, the AGENCY shall have the right to annul
this AGREEMENT without liability, or in its discre-
tion"to deduct from the AGREEMENT price or
consideration or otherwise recover the full amount of
such fee, commission, percentage,brokerage fee, gift,
or contingent fee.
Any and all employees of the CONSULTANT or
other persons while engaged in the performance of
a:-,} .....~:.;~ ,:;;'ss;:,,;:.a.s ,.6;.....i;:::;;~
:. ..- --......,.- . -:- .".-
~,'I~ ................".:;;.;;.....; I ,\.\ .
under this .~GR~::rvE=NT.shal! be cD~sidere::i
Page3 of 8
employees of the CONSULTANT only and not or the
AGENCY, and any and all claims that mayor might
arise under any Workmen's compensation Act on
behalf of said employees or other persons while so
engaged, and any and all claims made by a third party
as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of
the CONSULTANT's employees or other persons
while so engaged on any of the work or services
provided to be rendered herein, shall be the sole
obligation and responsibility of the CONSULTANT.
The CONSULTANT shall not engage, on a full or
part time basis, or other basis, during the period of the
contract, any professional or technical personnel who
are, or have been, at any time during the period of the
contract, in the employ of the United States Depart-
ment of Transportation, the STATE, or the
AGENCY, except regularly retired employees,
without written consent of the public employer of
such person.
VIII
NONDISCRIM INATION
The CONSULTANT agrees not to discriminate
against any client, employee or applicant for employ-
ment or for services because of race, creed, color,
national origin, marital status, sex, age or handicap
except for a bona fide occupational qualification with
regard to, but not limited to the following: employ-
ment upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or
any recruitment advertising, a layoff or terminations,
rates of payor other forms of compensation, selection
for training, rendition of services. The CONSULT-
ANT understands and agrees that if it violates this
provision, this AGREEMENT may be terminated by
the AGENCY and further that the CONSULTANT
shall be barred from performing any services for the
AGENCY now or in the future unless a showing is
made satisfactory to the AGENCY that discrimina-
tory practices have terminated and that recurrence of
such action is un!ikely.
During the performance of this AGREEMENT, the
CONSULTANT, for itself, its assignees and
successors in interest agrees as follows:
A. COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS: The
CONSULTANT shall comply with the Regula-
:;:::-.: ~.::;.::::~ ~: :-::,:-:::;:::~;;"';"'.::--,::':::::-. ;~. ::...s ::z:--:r, S
manner as in Federa!--essisted programs of ths
Departmen,tpf Transportation, Title 49 ,Code of
. .. . . ., - .
Federal Regulations, Part21,astheymay be
amended from time to time, (hereinafter referred
to asthe Regulations), which are herein incorpo-
rated by reference and made a partof this
AGREEMENT Theconsultantshallcomply
with the American' Disabilities Act.6f1 992, as
amended.
B. NONDISCRIMINA TION:TheCONSUL TANT,
with regard to the work performed. by it during the
AGREEMENT, shall not discriminate on the
grounds of race,creed, color,sex,age, marital
status, national ol'igin or handicap except fora
bona fide occupational qualification in the selec-
tionand retention of subconsultants, including
procurements of materials' and .leases of equip-
memt. The CONSULTANT shall not participate
either directly or indirectly in the' discrimination
prohibited bySection21.5 of the Regulations,
including employment practices when'the contract
covers a program set forth in Appendix II, of the
Regulations.
C. SOLICITATIONS FOR SUBCONSULTANTS,
INCLUDING PROCUREMENTS OF MATERI-
ALS AND EQUIPMENT: In all solicitations
either by competitive bidding or negotiation made
by the CONSULTANT for work to be performed
under a subcontraCt, including procurements of
materialsor.leasesof equipment, each potential
subconsultant or supplier shall be notified by the
CONSULTANT of the CONSULTANT's
obligations under this AGREEMENT and the
Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the
grounds of race, creed, color, sex, age, marital
status, national ol'igin and handicap.
D. INFORMATION AND REPORTS: The
CONSULTANT shall provide all information
and reports required by the Regulations, or
directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall
permit access to its books,records,accounts,
other sources of information, and its facilities as
may be determined by the AGENCY to be
pertinent to ascertain compliancewith such
Regulations or directives. Where any information
required of the CONSULTANT isin the exclu-
Page 4 of 8
sive possession of another who fails or refuses to
furnish this information the CONSULTANT shall
so certify to the AGENCY, or the United States
Department of Transportation as appropriate, and
shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain
the information.
E. SANCTIONS FOR NONCOMPLIANCE: In the
event ofthe CONSULTANT's noncompliance
with the nondiscrimination provisions of this
AGREEMENT, the AGENCY shall impose
such sanctions as it or the Federal Highway
Administration may determine to be appropriate,
including, but not limited to:
1. Withholding of payments to the CONSUL T-
ANT under the AGREEMENT until the
CONSULTANT complies, and/or
2_ Cancellation, termination or suspension of the
AGREEMENT, in whole or in part.
F. INCORPORATION OF PROVISIONS: The
CONSULTANT shall include the provisions of
paragraphs (A) through (G) in every subcontract,
including procurements of materials and leases of
equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations or
directives issued pursuant thereto. The CON-
SUL T ANT shall take such action with respect to
any subconsultantor procurement as the
AGENCY or the Federal Highway Administra-
tion may direct as a means of enforcing such
provisions including sanctions for noncompli-
ance; provided, however, that, in the event a
CONSULTANT becomes involved in, or is
threatened with, litigation with a subconsultant or
supplier as a result of such direction, the CON-
UL TANT may request the AGENCY to enter
into such litigation to protect the interests of the
AGENCY, and in addition, the CONSULTANT
may request the United States to enter into such
litigation to protect the intcrc5t3 of the United
States.
G. UNFAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES: The
CONSULTANT shall comply with RCW
49.60.180.
IX
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
The right is reserved by the AGENCY to terminate
this AGREEMENT at any time tJpon ten days written
notice to the CONSULTANT.
In the eVent thisAGREEMENT is terrninatedby the
AGENCY other than for default on the part of the
CONSULTANT, a final payment shall be made to the
CONSULTANTas shown in Exhibit F for the type of
AGREEMENT used.
No payment shall be made for any work completed
after ten days following receipt by the, CONSUL T-
ANT of the Notice to terminate. If the accumulated
payment made to the CONSULTANT prior to Notice
of Termination exceeds the total amount that would
be due computed as set forth herein above, then no
tinal paymentshall be due and the CONSULTANT
shall immediately reimburse the AGENCY for any
exc,ess paid.
If the services of the CONSULTANT are terminated
by the AGENCY for default on the part of the CON-
SULTANT. the above formulaforpayment shall not
apply. In such an 'event, the amount to be paid shall be
determined by the AGENCY with consideration
given to the actual costs incurred by the CONSULT-
ANT in performing the work to the date of
termination, the amount of work originally required
which was satisfactorily completed to dateoftermina-
tion, whether that work isin a form or a type which is
usable to the AGENCY at the time of termination;
the cost to the AGENCY of employing. another firm
to complete the work required and the time which
maybe required to do so, and other factors which
affectthevalue to the AGENCYoftheworkper~
formed at the time of termination. Under no
circumstances shall payment made under this subsec-
tion exceed the amount which would have been made
using the formula set forth in the previous paragraph.
If it is determined for any reason that the CONSULT-
ANT was not in default or that the CONSULTANT's
failure to perform is without it or it's employee's fault
or negligence, the termination shall be deemed to be a
termination for the convenience of the AGENCY in
, '" " . '.....- ~ '-.---. .-, .-
.=..::';::,::,:",=,:,;",.:>,,:;' ..',:,'- :: .S_j::";; ~ ..:..:.:--: '::_~;-i;2: .-....;.;-....::::.h._=. "."
Page 5 of 8 '
In the event of the death of any member, partner or
officer of the CONSULTANT or any of its supervi-
sory personnel assigned to the project, or, dissolution
of the partnership, termination of the corporation, or
disaffiliation of the principally involved employee,
the surviving members of the CONSULTANT hereby
agree to complete the work under the terms of this
AGREEMENT, if requested to do so by the
AGENCY. The subsection shall not be a bar to
renegotiation of the AGREEMENT between the
surviving members of the CONSULTANT and the
AGENCY, if the AGENCY so chooses.
In the event of the death of any of the parties listed in
the previous paragraph, should the surviving members
of the CONSULTANT, with the AGENCY's concur-
rence, desire to terminate this AGREEMENT,
payment shall be made as set forth in the second
paragraph of this section.
Payment for any part of the work by the AGENCY
shall not constitute a waiver by the AGENCY of any
remedies of any type it may have against the CON-
SUL T ANT for any breach of this AGREEMENT by
the CONSULTANT, or for failure of the CONSUL T-
ANT to perform work required of it by the
AGENCY. Forbearance of any rights under the
AGREEMENT will not constitute waiver of entitle-
ment to exercise those rights with respect to any
future act or omission by the CONSULTANT.
X
CHANGES OF WORK
The CONSULTANT shall make such changes and
revisions in the complete work of this AGREEMENT
as necessary to correct errors appearing therein, when
required to do so by the AGENCY, without additional
,compensation thereof. Should theAGENCY find it
desirable for its own purposes to have previously
satisfactorily completed work or parts thereof
changed or revised, the CONSULTANT shall make
such revisions as directed by the AGENCY. This
work shall be considered as Extra Work and will be
paid for as herein provided under Section XIV.
XI
DISPUTES
Any dispute concerning questions offactinconnec-
tion with the work not disposed of by AGREEMENT
bew,;een the CONSULTANTand the,AGENCYshall
be referred for determ ination to the Director of Public
Works or AGENCY Engineer, whose decision in the
matter shall be final and binding on the parties of this
AGREEMENT, provided however, that if an action is
brought challenging the Director of public Works or
AGENCY Engineer's decision, that decision shall be
subject to de novo jUdicial review.
XII
VENUE, APPL ICABLE f...A~ AND
PERSONAL JURISDICT ION
In the event that either party deems it necessary to
institute legal action or proceedings to enforce any
right or obligation under this AGREEMENT, the
parties hereto agree that any such action shall be
initiated in the Superior court of the State of Washing-
ton, situated in the county the AGENCY is located in.
The parties hereto agree that all questions shall be
resolved by application of Washington law and that
the parties to such action shall have the right of appeal
from such decisions of the Superior courtin accor-
dance with the'laws of the State of Washington. The
CONSULTANT hereby consents to the personal
jurisdiction of the Su~eribr court oUhe State of
Washington, situated in the county in which the
AGENCY is located in.
XIII
LEGAL RELATIONS AND INSURANCE
The CONSULTANT shall complywithall Federal,
State, and 'local laws and ordinances applicable to the
work to be done under ~is AGREEMENT. This
AGREEMENT shall be interpreted and construed in
accord with the laws of Washington.
The CONSULTANT shall indemnify and holdIhe
AGENCY and the STATE,and their officers and
employees harmless frem and shall process and
defend at its own expense all claims, demands, or
suits at law or equity arising in whole or in part from
the CONSULTANTs ne~ligencebr breach of any of
its obiigations under this AGReelv1eNT; provided
that nothing herein shall require a CONSULTANT to
indemnify the AGENCY and the STATE against and
hold harmless the AGENCY and the STATE from
claims, demands or suits based solely upon the
conduct of the AGENCY and the STATE, their
agents, officers and employees and provided further
that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from
the concurrent negligence of (a) the
CONSULTANT's agents or employees and (b) the
AGENCY and the STATE, their agents, officers and
employees, this indemnity provision with respect to
(1 ) claims or suits based upon such negligence, (2) the
costs to the AGENCY and the STATE of defending
such claims and suits, etc. shall be valid and enforce-
able only to the extent of the CONSUL T ANT's
negligence or the negligence of the CONSULTANT's
agents or employees.
The CONSULTANT's relation to the AGENCY shall
be at all times as an independent contractor.
The CONSULTANT specifically assumes potential
liability for actions brought by the CONSULTANT's
own employees against the AGENCY and:solely for
the purpose of this indemnification and defense, the
CONSULTANT specifically waives any immunity
under the state industrial insurance law, Title 51
RCW. The CONSULTANT recognizes that this
waiver was specifically entered into pursuant to the
provisions of RCW 4.24.115 and was the subject of
mutual negotiation.
Unless otherwise specified in the AGREEMENT, the
AGENCY shall be responsible for administration of
construction contracts, if any, on the project. Subject
to the processing of an acceptable, supplemental
agreement, the CONSULTANT shall provide on-call
assistance to the AGENCY during contract adminis-
'tration. By providing such assistance, the
CONSULTANT shall assume no responsibility for:
proper construction techniques, job site safety, or any
construction contractor's failure to perform its work
in accordance with the contract documents.
The CONSULTANT shall obtain and keep in force
during the terms of the AGREEMENT, or as other-
wise required, the following insurance with
companies or through sources approved by the State
Insurance Comm:sslaner pl1iSL:an: tc ~C\iV 48.
Page 5 of g
A. Worker's compensation andemployer'sliability
insurance' as required by the STATE.
B. General commercial liability insurance in an
amount not less than a single limit of one million
and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily
injury, including death and property damage
per occurrence.
Excepting the Worker's Compensation insurance and
any professionalliabHity insurance secured by the
CONSULTANT, the AGENCYlIViII be named on all
, ,
certificates of insurance as an additional insured. The
CONSULTANT shall furnish theAGENGY with
verification of insurance andendorsementsrequired
by this AGREEMENT. The AGENCY reserves the
right to require complete, certified copies of all
required insurancepoliciesatanytime.
All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance
company ,authorized to do business in the State of
Washington. The CONSULT ANT shall submit a
verification of insurance as outlined above within
14 days of the execution of this AGREEMENT to
the AGENCY.
No cancellation ofthe foregoing policies shall be
effective withouUhirty(30) days prior notice to
the AGENCY.
The CONSULTANT's professional , liabHity to the
. AGENCY shall be limited to the amount payable
under this AGREEMENT or one million dollars,
whichever isthegreater unless modified by
ExhibitH.ln no case shall the CONSULTANT's
professional liability to third parties be limited in
any way.
The AGENCY will paynoprogress payments
under Section V until the CONSULTANT hasfully
complied with this section. This remedyi$ not exclu-
sive; and the AGENCY and the STATE may take
such other action as is available to them under other
provisions of this AGREEMENT, or otherWise in law.
Page 7 orB
XIV
EXTRA WORK
A. The AGENCY may at any time, by written order,
make changes within the general scope of the
AGREEMENT in the services to be performed.
B. If any such change causes an increase or decrease
in the estimated cost of, or the time required for,
performance of any part of the work under this
AGREEMENT, whether or not changed by the
order, or otherwise affects any other terms and
conditions of the AGREEMENT, the AGENCY
shall make an equitable adjustment in the
(1) maximum amount payable; (2) delivery or
completion schedule, or both; and (3) other
affected terms and shall modify the AGREE-
MENT accordingly.
C. The CONSULTANT must submit its "request
for equitable adjustment" (hereafter referred to
as claim) under this clause within 30 days from
the date of receipt of the written order. However, ,
if the AGENCY decides that the facts justify it,
the AGENCY may receive and act upon a claim
submitted before final payment of the
AGREEMENT.
D. Failure to agree to any adjustment shall be a
dispute under the Disputes clause. However
nothing in this clause shall excuse the CON-
SUL TANT from proceeding with the
AGREEMENT as changed.
E. Notwithstanding the terms and condition of
paragraphs (a) and (b) above, the maximum
amount payable for this AGREEMENT, shall
not be increased or considered to be increased
except by specific written supplement to this
AGREEMENT.
xv
ENDORSEM ENT OF PLANS
The CONSULTANT shall place his endorsement on
all plans, estimates or any other enginee~ing data
furnished by him.
XVI
FEDERAL AND ST ATE REVIEW
The Federal Highway fl,dministratiohand the
Washington State Departmentof Transportation
shall have the right to participate in the reviewor
examination of the work in progress.
XVII
CERTIFICATION OF THE CONSULTANT
AND THEAGENCY
Attached hereto as Exhibit "A-1 ", are the
Certifications of the Consultant and the Agency,
Exhibit "A-2" Certification regarding debarment,
suspension and other responsibility matters - primary
covered transactions, Exhibit "A-3" Certifuation
regarding the restrictions of the use of Federalfunds
for lobbying, and Exhibit "A-4" Certifcateof Current
Cost or Pricing Data. Exhibits "A-3">and "A.c.4" are
only required in Agreements over $100,000.
XVIII
COM PLETE AGREEM ENT
This document and referenced attachments contains
all covenants, stipulations and provisions agreed upon
by the parties. No agent, or representative of either
party has authority to make, and the parties shall not
be bound by or be liable for, any statement, represen-
tation, promise or agreement not set forth herein. No
changes, amendments, ,or modifications of the terms
hereof shall be valid unless reduced to writing and
signed by the parties as an amendment to this
AGREEMENT.
XIX
EXECUTION AND ACCEPT ANCE
This AGREEMENT may be simultaneously executed
in several counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed to be an original having identical legal effect.
The CONSULTANT does hereby ratify and adopt all
statements, representations, warranties, covenants,
and agreements contained in the proposal, and the
supporting materials submitted by the CONSUL T-
ANT, and does hereby accept the AGREEMENT and
agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof.
In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year first
above written, . ......... 4,//j,.., /Z,Vl.,.,l
l/l /I/I~/ ,/
By 111/ / ;/,/ ~
//1//1/1-/
cot~ . ~~O~CrtaCOb~,KPG
By
Agency Mayor, City of Tukv;rila
Page 8 of 8
~.
ExhibitA-1
Certification Of Consultant
Project No.
Local Agency Tukwila
I hereby certify thatI am P. Joseph Giacobazzi
representativeofthe finn of KPG,Inc
753 9th Avenue North, Seattle,WA 98109
firm I ~ere represent has:
and duly authorized
whose address is
and that neither I nor the above
(a) Employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent fee or other consideration, any
firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above CONSULTANT) to
solicit or secure this contract.
(b) Agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or to retain the services of
any firm or' person in connection with carrying out the contract.
(c) Paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely
for me or the above CONSULTANT) any fee, cgp.tribution donation or consideration of any kind for, or in
connection with procuring or carrying out the contract; except as here expressly stated (if any):
I further certify thatthefirm I hereby represent isauthorizedto do business in the State of Washington and
that the firm is in full compliance with the requirements of the board of Professional Registration.
I acknowledge that thiscertiicateis to be avallableto the State Department of Transportation and the
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in connection with this contract
involving participation of Federal aid funds and is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal
, and civil.
Jl J>) 1 ,/ O{/-
;/ 'Date
.f/J1/A ~.
II' (/ V 5',,,,,w,.
Certification of Agency Official
I herebycertifythatI am the AGENCY Official ofthe Local Agency of City ofTukwila Washington
and that the above consulting firm or their representative. has not been required, directly or indirectly as an
express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this contract to:
(a) Employ or retain, or agree to employ or retain, any firm or person, or
(b) Payor agree to pay to any firm, person or organization, any fee, contribution, donation or consideration of
any kind, except as here expressly stated (if any).
I acknowledged that this certificate is to be available to the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department
of Transportation., in connection with this contract involving participation of Federal aid highway funds and it
subject to applicable Stae and Federal laws, both criminal and civil.
Date
Signature
Exhibit A-2
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility
. Matters-Primary Covered ,Transactions
1. The prospective primary participant certifies to the best of its lmowledge and belief, that it and its
principals:
(a) Are not presently debarred, ,suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from covered transactions,byany federal department or agency;
(b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment
rendered against them for commission orfraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining,
attempting to, obtain, or performing apublic (federal, state, or local) transaction or contract under a public
transaction; violation of federal or state antitrust statues or, commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery,
bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
(c) Are :not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (federal,
state, or local)with commission of any of the offenses en~erated in paragraph l.b. of this certification;
and
(d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public
transactions (federal, state, or local) terminated for cause or default
2. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification,
such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
Consultant (Firm): KPG, Ine
); l / I j./I}t.V
,/ I (Date)
/J /J
/' ,/
~/ 11/1
/ /1 ,',,' / / ,/
;:/Y//iL
/yure)7rdent o(Kuthorized Official of Consultant
" " ExhibitA-3
Certification Regarding The Restrictions
of The use of Federal Funds for Lobbying
The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her
knowledge and belie:t;,that:
1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid orwill be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a member of
Congress, an officer or empl()yeeof Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with
the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the
entering into of any cooperative agreement, andth~ extension"continuation, renewal, amendment, or
modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
2. If any funds other thanfederalappropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a member of Congress,
an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of-Congress in connection with this
federal contract, grant, lo~, orc09perative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard
Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to ReportL obbying," in accordance with its instructions_
This certification is a material representation offact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction
was made or entered into." SubmiSsion of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this
transaction imposed by SectionB52, T itle31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required
certification shaUbe subject toa civil penalty of not less thim $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each
such failure.
. Theprospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require
that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts which exceed $100,000 and
that aU suchsubrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
Consultant (Finn): KPG, Inc
(Date)
~ /1
// /' /?
/f j;// /l
h / /~ //;//
Ii // //.// ~
(Si;;ifU~~;,~srr/~OriZed Official of Consultant
,'/ ;1 /-/
/'
J
I I / \! .~/L/
~,II / l- /;.;"~,
Exhibit A-4
Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data
This is to verify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the cost or pricing data (as defined in
section 15.401 of the Federal AcquisitionRegulation (Flill.) and required \illder FAR subsection 15.403-4)
submitted, either actually or by specific identification in writing, to the contracting officer or to the
contracting officer's representative in support of Exhibit D-1
* are accurate, complete, andcurreht as of November 11, 2004 **. This certification includes
the cost or pricing' data supporting any advance agreements and forward pricing rate agreements between
the offeror and the Govenunehtthat are part of the proposal.
Firm KPG, Inc
Name P. Joseph Giacobazzi,KPG
Title Prin.cipal
Date ofExecution***
nlll /01&
* Identify the proposal, quotation, request for price adjustment, or other submission involved,
giving the appropriate identifying number (e.g_,RFP No.).
** Insert the day, month"and year when price negotiations were concluded and price agreement
was reached.
*** Insert the day, month, and year of signing, which should be as close as practicable to the date
when the price negotiations were concluded and the. contract price was agreed to.
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF TuKWILJ\.
INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH
S.143RDSTREETTOFORTDENTWAY
KPG, Inc.
Scope of Work
October 27, 2004
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The CityofTukwila intends to improve Interurban Avenue South between South 14yd
Street and Fort Dent Way. Recent funding for this project includes the preparation of
plans, specifications and estimate, and right-of-way plans to improve the corridor.
Improvements will include:
· Minor widening to provide for standard lane widths.
.' Installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk on both sides of the road
· Pavement rehabilitation and overlay
· New lighting
· Interconnect and CCTV
· Signalmodificatibnsasnecessary at Fort Dent Way
· Aerial utility undergrounding
· Storm drainage improvements including detention and water quality treatment
· Landscaping,and irrigation
· Slope stabilizatioIi of the exposed scarp above the road near Fort Dent Way
· Possible retaining walls to contain the wider roadway section
· New channelization and 'signing
Project design and right-of-way plans will comply with federal funding requirements
outlinedintheWSDOTLocal Agency Guidelines Manual. It is anticipated the project will
require an Environmental Classification Summary and that the project will fall under the
1:JEPA Categorical Exclusion CCE) with documentation. This scope of work assumes that
the documented CE will meet NEP A requirements.
In addition it is anticipated that the project will require SEP A approval, Shoreline
Approval and a Biological Assessment.
B. DELIVERABLES
The Consultant shall provide the following deliverables with this project:
· Digital files of base mapping
· 2 copies preliminary geotechnical report
· 2' copies final geotechnical report
· 2 copies of draft pavement report
Page 10f6
EXHIBIT B
.
2 copies offinal pavement report
File copyof SEPA checklist
File copy of all perrnitapplications
5 copies Drainage Design Report
· . 10c6pies30%plans and estimate (11"x1?,,)
10 copies 60% plans, specifications, and estimate (11"x17")
10 copies 90% plans, specifications, and estimate (11 "x17")
2copies preliminaryright-of-way needs plans (11 "xl?")
File copy of Final right-of-way plan (22",04" Mylar)
Digital copies of all deliverables, in requested format
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The City ofT ukwilashall provide the following:
· GIS aerial mapping information in digital format
· Existing survey ahdright-of-way information
· Any required traffic counts
· Previous roadway design studies
· Plan reviews, COmments, and approvals
· Property owner mailings, if required
· Meeting room arrangements
· Survey right-of-entries, ifrequired
· Environmental Classification Summary
· Biological Assessment
C. SCOPE OF WORK
TASK1- MANAGEMENT / COORDINATION / ADMINISTRATION
1.1 The Consultant shall provide continuous project management for the project
duration (estimate 12 months).
1.2 The Consultant shall prepare a comprehensive schedule and provide updates as
necessary.
1.3 The Consultant shall ,prepare monthly progress reports identifying work in
progress, upcoming work elements, and a reporting of any delays, problems or
additional information needs.
1.4 The Consultantshall provide management and administration of all subcontractors
included inrhisscope or work.
1.5 The Consultant shall prepare for and attend coordination meetings with City staff
at regular intervals in the design process to discuss key issues and track progress
(estimate 10 meetings).
Page 2 of6
EXHIBIT B
1.6 The ConsultaIltshallprovidequality assurance/quality control (QNQC) reviews
of all work products prior to submittal for City review.
TASK 2--SURVEYAND BASE MAPJ?mG
2.1 The Consultant shall prepare design base maps of the corridor that includes the
100 yeadloodplainandrwo river crOss sections of the Duwamish River and the
slopescaxpn.ear Fort Dent Way. EarthTech will provide survey, base mapping and
right of way plans.
2.2 The Consultant shall coordinate field locates of all existing utilities in the corridor
for incorPoration into the updated base maps. Field locates will be prepared by
APS,Inc. A budget of $4,000 is included for use in field locates and potholing.
PotholingIleedswill be identified following completion of the 30% design and
City review.
TASK 3 - PUBLIC INvOLVEMENT
3.1 The Consultant shallpn:pare for and attend one (1) community open house
meeting. Meeting locations will be secured by the City.
3;2 The "Consultant shall attend one-on-one meetings with affected property owners
along the. corridor to discuss the project, private property impacts andlor right-of-
way and easement needs (estimate 6 meetings).
3.3 The Consultant shall prepare one newsletter to invite residents to community open
house meeting. Preparation of distribution lists and mailing will be by the City.
TASK 4- WSDOT COORDINATION
4.1 The Consultant shall attend one coordination meeting with WSDOT to obtain
review and apprbval of the project design at the Fort Dent Way intersection.
4.2 The Consultant shall prepare, submit, and respond to WSDOT comments for plan.
reviews;
4.3 The Consultant shall document meeting notes and phone correspondence with
WSDOT.
Page 3 of6
-
EXHIBITB
5.1 The Con$ultantshall dis6:ibutemailings and preliminary plans to franchise utility
purveyors along the corridor in order to facilitate relocation and adjustment
coordination
5.2 The Consultant shall coordinate with franchise utilities to incorporate the
necessary relocations, adjustments or upgrades into the project design.
5.3 TheConsult:mtshallcoordinate with Seattle City Light and'PSE for utility
undergrounding improvements along the corridor (estimate 2 meetings).
5.4 The Consultant shall complete undergrounding civil conversion design based on
conduit, vault and slab information provided by the utility purveyors. This scope is
based on the assumption that the Seattle City Light system will be transferred over
to PSE and that the utility undergrounding electrical design will be completed by
PSE.
5.5 The Consultant shall document meeting notes and phone correspondence with all
franchise utility purveyors,
TASK 6 - GEOTECHNlCAL Th.TVESTIGATION
6.1 The Consultant shall obtain previous geotechnical information from past studies
thatrnay have been prepared by the City, METRO,WSDOT or others in the
project vicinity.
6.2 Based on previous studies. and field reconnaissance, the Consultant shall prepare a
preliminary geotechnical'.review of the project. Preliminary geotechnical review will
be performed by Landau Associates.
6.3 The Consultant shall complete field explorations to support pipeline design, slope
stabilization, retaining wall design and pavement design based on the approved
30% plans. Field eA'})loration will be under the supervision of Landau Associates.
Existing pavement sections willbe confirmed by rota-hammer exploration at up to
8 locations.
6.4 The Consultant shall compile previous geotechnical findings with the results of
field explorations to develop geotechnical engineering results and conclusions.
Geotechnical analysi$Vi>i.ll be performed by Landau Associates in accordance with
this scope of work.
Page4of6
~'
TASK 7 -P AVEMENTI1\T\TESTIGATION
7.1 The Consultant sh.all field test the existing pavement section using a falling weight
deflectometerand existing pavement data to develop a pavement
reconstruction/overlay plan for the corridor based on traffic composition data
provided by the City.
7.2 The Consultant shall compile the results of field explorations to develop a
pavement reconstruction report. Pavement testing and report preparation will be
performed by Pavement Engineers.
TASK 8 - PERlvu.l'lli~G
8.1 The Consu.lta.ntshallcoordinate with the King County Rood District for
acceptanceo{ the, project scope (estimate 2 meetings).
8.2 TheConstiltantshallprepare and submit a SEPA checklist for review and
processing by the City,
8.3 The Consultant sha.ll Prepare and submit a Shoreline Permit for review and
processing by the City.
8.4 The Consultant shall document all meeting notes and phone correspondence with
resource agencies.
TASK 9 - PREPARE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE
9.1 The Consultantshall review alignment options and recommend minor variations
to thealignrnent, channelization, median locations, etc. as appropriate. The
variations willbe prepared in collaboration with City staff with the preferred
alternative used for the basis of final design.
9.2. The Consultant shall prepare 30% plans based on the preferred alternative for City
review and approval.
9.3 The Consultant shall prepare a Drainage Report for the project that outlines
drainage basins, flow rates, detention and water quality facilities.
9.4 The Consultant shall prepare structu.ral design based on the preferred alternative.
Strucmral design will be by CivilT echo It is assumed that the project structural
elements will include 4,000:!: squ~re feet of structural wall and 25,000:!: square feet
of soil stabilization slope' covering.
PageS of6
, -
-,
EXHIBIT B
9.5 The,Conslllta.ntshall prepare 60% plans,and cost estimate for the roadway
corridoLTheplahs shalLbe in sufficient detail to allow review and confirmation of
plannedroaciway,pedestrian, channelization, drainage, and illumination system by
the City during review.
9.6 The Consultant shall prepare 90% Plans (estimate 90 sheets) for review and
approval by the City. Plans shall be formatted to provide sufficient detail for
convenient field layout of all proposed facilities. City standard details and WSDOT
standard plans will be supplemented with project specific details as required. Plan
information shall include:
· Centerline control information
· Limits of construction
· Typical sections and details
· Roadwayplan and profiles
· Temporary erosion and sediment control plans
· Drainage system plan and profiles
· Wall plan and profiles, and slope stabilization plans and details
· Channelization and Signing plans
· Signatthodification plans and details
· Illumination plans
· Civil undergrounding design
· Urban Design plans and details
· Landscape/restoration plans
· Irrigation plans and details
9.7 The Consultant shall prepare 60% (outline only) and 90% specifications for review
and approval by the City. Specifications shall be based on 2002 WSDOT / APWA
standard specifications, using contract boilerplate and general special provisions
provided by the City.
9.8 The Consultant shall calculate quantities and prepare a construction cost estimate'
in support of the 30%, 60%, and 90% plans and specifications.
TASK10- RIGHT-Of-WAY
10.1 The Consultant shall prepare preliminary right-of-way plans to document existing
conditiotl$ based on existing Assessor and WSDOT information.
10.2 The Consultant shall finalize right-of-way plans based on the 60% design. The final
right-of-way plans will identify all necessary easements and right-of-way acquisition.
Page 6 of6
.'--"',:-
Exhibit C-2
Payment
(Cost Plus Fixed Fee)
The CONSUL TA.1\JT shall be paid by the AGE NCYfor completed work and services rendered under this
AGREEMENT as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full compensation for all work performed or
services rendered and for all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals necessary to complete the work
specified in Se:ctionII, "Scope ofW.ork."The CONSUL TANT shall conform with the applicable portion of 48
CFR 31.
A. Actual Costs
Payment for alfconsu.lting services for this project shall be on the basis of the CONSUL T ANT's actual cost
plus a fixed fee. T he actual cost shall include direct salary cost, overhead, and direct nonsalary cost.
1. Direct Salary Costs
The direct salary cost is the:. direct salary paid to prinCipals, professional, technical, and clerical personnel
for the time: they are productively engaged in work necessary to fulfill the terms of this AGRE EMENT.
2. Overhead Costs
Overhead costS are those costs other than direct costs which are included as such on the books of the
CONSUL T ANT in the normal everyday keeping of its books. Progress payments shall be made at the
rate shown in the heading ofthisAGRE EMENT, under "Ove:rhead Progress Payment Rate_" Total
overhead payment shall be based on the method shown in the heading of the AGRE EMENT. The three
options are explained as follows:
a. Actual Cost Not T 0 Exce:ed Maximum Percent If this method is indicated in the heading of this
AGREEMENT, the AGENCY agrees to reimburse the CONSUL TANT at the actual overhead rate
verified by audit up to the maximum percentage shown in the space provided. Final overhead payment
when aCcumulated with all other actual costs shall not exceed the total maximum amount payable
shown in the heading of this AGRE EMENT.
b. Fixed Rate: If this method is indicated in the heading of the AGRE EMENT, the AGENCY agrees to
reimburse the CONSUL T ANT for overhead at the percentage rate shown. T his rate shall not change
during the life of the AGREEMENT.
A summary of the CONSULTANT's cost estimate and the overhead computation are attached hereto as
Exhibit D-l and by this reference made part of thisAGRE EMENT. When an Actual Cost method, or the
Actual CostNot T o Exceed method is used, the CONSUL TANT (prime and all subconsultants) will
submit to the AGE NCYwithin three months after the end of each firm's fiscal year, an overhead
schedule in the format required by the AGE NCY (cost category, dollar expenditures, etc.) for the purpose
of adjusting the overhead rate for billing purposes. It shall be used for the computation of progress
payments during thefoHowingyear and tor retroactively adjusting the previous year's overhead cost to
reflect the actual rate.
Failure to supply this inform ation by either the prim e consultant or any of the sub consultants shall
cause the agency to withhold paym ent of the billed overhead costs until such fun e as the required
information is received and an overhead rate for billing purposes is approved.
~\" "\::~(;. "-;
The STATEand/orthe Federal Governrh.ent mayperfol11l an audit of the CONSUL TANT's books and
recmds at any time during regular business hours to determine the actual overhead rate, if they so desire.
3. DirectNc.msalary Costs
Direct nansalary costs will be reimbursed at the actual cast to the CONSUL TANT. These charges may
include, but are nat limited to the fallawingitems: travel, printing, long distance telephone, supplies,
camputer charges"and fees afsubcansultants. Air ar,iTain travel will 'only be reimbursed ta economy
class levels Unless athelWise approved by the AGE NCY. Autamobile mileage far travel will be
reimbursed at the current rate app' avedfar AGE NCY emplayees and shall be supparted by the date and
time 'of each trip with 'origin and destination 'of such trips. Subsistence and ladging expenses will be .
reimbursed at the same rate as far AGE NCY employees. T he billing far nansalary cast, directly
identifiable witb.thePraject, shall be an itemized listing 'of the charges supparted by copies 'of 'original
bj1ls, invaices, expense accounts, and miscellaneous supporting data retained by the CONSUL T ANT.
Capiesaf the 'original supparting dacuments shall be provided ta the AGE NCY upan request. All 'of the
above Cl1arges must be necessary for the services ta be pravided under this A GRE EMENT.
4. Fixed Fee
The fixed fee, which represents the CONSUL TANT's profit, is shown in the heading 'of this
AGREEMENT under Fiied Fee. This am aunt daes not include anyadditianal fixed fee which cauld be
autharized from the Management Reserve Fund. T, his fee is based an the scape 'of wark defmed in this
AGREEMENT and the estimated man-manths required ta perfarm the stated scape ofwark. In the event
a supplemental agreement is entered inta faradditianal wark by the CONSUL TANT, the supplemental
agreement may include provisians far the ,added casts and an appropriate additional fee. T he fixed fee
will be prorated and paid manthly in proportionta the percentage 'of wark completed by the
CONSUL TANT ,and reparted in the manthly progress reparts accampanying the invaices.
Any partian of the fixed fee earned but not previausly paid in the progress payments will be covered in the
fuialpayment, subject ta the pravisians 'of Sectian IX, T enninatian 'of Agreement.
5. Management Reserve Fund
The AGENCY may desire ta establish a Management Reserve Fund to pravide the Agreement
Administrator the flexibility 'of autharizing additianal funds ta the AGRE EMENT for allawable
unfareseen casts, or reimbursing the CONSUL T ANT far additianal wark beyand that already defined in
this AGREEMENT., Such autharizatian(s) shall be in writing and shall nat exceed the lesser 'of $50,000
'or 10% 'of the Total AmauntAuthorized as shawn in the heading of this AGRE EMENT. The amount
included far the Management Reserve Fund is shown in the heading of this agreement. T his fund may be
replenished in a subsequent supplemental agreement. Any changes requiring additional costs in excess 'of
the "Management Reserve Fund" shall be made in accordance with Section XIV, "E xtra Work."
6. Maximum Total Amaunt Pa:yable
The maximUI1l total amount payable, by the AGE NCY ta the CONSUL TANT under this AGRE EMENT,
shall not exceed the amount shown in the heading of this A GRE EMENT.
The Maximum T atal Amount Payable is comprised of the Total Amount Authorized, which includes the
Exec! Fee-anc1 the': Management R e<;erv('" Fmv:t T, he" M a"Cimum T 0ta 1 Am0m~t P?vat-k d0e'''' not !nc1uck
paymemfor extra work as stipulated inSectionXI\ .,-'E xtra W ork:-
B. MonthIfProgr-ess Pa)'ments
The CONSUL TANT may submit invoices to the AGE .NCY for reimbursement of actual costs plus the
calculated overhead and feenot more often than once per month during the progress of the work. Such
invoices shall iJe in a fonnat approved by the AGE NCY and accompanied by the monthly progress reports
required under Section III, General Requirements, of this AGRE EMENT. The invoices will be supported by
an itemizedlisting fqreach item including direct salary, direct nonsalary, and allowable overhead costs to
which will be added the prorated Fixed Fee. . T 0 provide a means of verifying the invoiced salary costs for
CONSULTANT employees, the AGE NCY may conduct employee interviews. These interviews may consist
of recording the narnes,titles, and present duties of those employees perfonning work on the PROJE CT at the
time of the interview.
C. Final Payment
FinalpayIXlentofany balance due the CONSUL T ANT of the gross amount earned will be made promptly
upon its verification by the AGE NCY after the completion of the work under this AGRE EMENT,
contingent uponreceipt of all PS&E,plans, maps, notes, reports, and other related documents which are
required to be furnished under thisAGREEMENT. Acceptance of such final payment by the
CONSULTANT shall constitute a release of all claims for payment which the CONSUL T ANT may have
against theAGE NCY unless such claims are specifically reserved in writing and transmitted to the
AGENCY by the CONSUL TANTpriorto its acceptance. Said final payment shall not, however, be a bar
to anyclaims that the AGE NCYmayhave against the CONSUL TANTor to any remedies the AGE NCY
may pursue with respectto such claims.T he payment of any billing will not constitute agreement as to the
appropnateneSsof any item and thaJ atthe time of final audit, all required adjustments will be made and
reflected in a final payment In the event that such final audit reveals an overpayment to the
CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT will refund such overpayment to the AGE NCY within ninety (90)
days of notice of the overpayment Such refund shall not constitute a waiver by the CONSUL T ANT for
any claims relating to the validity ofa finding by the AGE NCY of overpayment
D. Inspectlonof CosfRecords
The CONSUL T.A.NTand the sub consultants shall keep available for inspection by representatives of the
AGENCY and the United States, for a period of three years after final payment, the cost records and
accounts pertaining tothis AGRE EMENT and all items related to or bearing upon these records with the
following exception: ifanylitigation, claim, or audit arising out of, in connection with, or related to this
contract is initiated before the expiration of the three-year period, the cost records and accounts shall be
retained until such litigation, claim, or audit involving the records is completed.
HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE EXHIBIT D-1
Project: City of Tukwila
interurban Avenue South
S. 143rd Street to Fort Dent Way
]Eic. JP 4G-
• Architecture •
Landscape Architecture
• Civil Engineering •
Task
Description
Task1 - Mana ement/coord
*Project
Manager
$ 136.42
Labor Hour Estimate
*Project
Engineer *Engineer *Technician
$ 102.31 $ 75.04 $ 61.39
*Admin
$ 54.58 Fee
Total Fee
Task 2 - Survey and base maoDlna
_
2.1 Coordinate survey work
1.1 Management and administration (estimate 12 months)
36
24
0
0
36
9,331.70
1.2
_ Prepare and update protect schedule
4
12
0
0
0
1,773.41
1.3 Prepare monthly progress reports -
8
8
0
0
8
2,346.54
1.4 Subconsultant coordination
8
12
0
0
4
2,537.44
1.5 City design coordination meetings (estimate 10)
10
10
0
0
0
$ 2,387.33
1.6 QA/QC reviews
Reimbursable
16
0
0
0
0
$ 2,182.76
expenses - see breakdown for details
175.00
Task Totals
82
66
0
0
48
20,734.18
Task 2 - Survey and base maoDlna
_
2.1 Coordinate survey work
4
8
0
0
0
$ 1,364.17
2.2 Coordinate utility locates
0
2
0
0
0
$ 204.62
2.3 Prepare base maps
0
4
8
24
0
$ 2,482.80
Reimbursable expenses - see breakdown for details
20
8
8
8
$ 6,504.87
$ 64,175.00
Task Totals
4
14
8
24
0
$ 68,226.59
Task 3 - Public Involvement
..1.1 Hrepare for and attend (1)_community open house
4
12
6
12
8
0
8
0
4
0
$ 2,469.27
$ 2,864.79
$ _ 695.80
--' -475.00
3.2 One-on-one property owner meetings (est 6)
3.3 Prepare newsletter
2
2
0
0
4
Reimbursable expenses - see breakdown for details
2
0
0
2
Task Totals
18
20
8
8
8
$ 6,504.87
Task 4 - WSDOT coordination
4.1 coordination meeting for design review/approval
2
2
0
0
477.47
4.2 Prepare and submit roadway design information
2
4
8
8
2
1,882.64 _
$ 586.63
4.3 Document meeting notes
2
0
0
2
Reimbursable expenses - see breakdown for details
350.00
Task Total
6
8
8
$ 3,296.74
11/11/2004
HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
Project: City of Tukwila
Interurban Avenue South
S. 143rd Street to Fort Dent Way
EXHIBIT D-1
• Architecture •
Landscape Architecture
• Civil Engineering •
Task
Description
Labor Hour Estimate
*Project
Manager
$ 136.42
*Project.
Engineer
$ 102.31
*Engineer
$ 75.04
Task 5 - Utility coordination
*Technician
$ 61.39
•
*Admin
$ 54.58
Total Fee
Fee
_ 0. i rrepare ana distribute mailings to franchise utilities
0
8
0
0
8
$ 1,255.16
5.2 Coordinate franchise relocations and service_u_p_grades
4
8
8
8
0
$ 2,455.55
• 5.3 Seattle City Light coordination meetings (est 2)
2
4
4
0
0
$ 982.23
_ 5.4 _Complete utility conversion design
8
32
48
64
0
$ 11,895.76
5.5 Document meeting notes
0
2
0
0
2
$ 313.79
$ 275.00
Reimbursable expenses - see breakdown for details
16
0
12
0
$ 27,226.97
Task Total
14
54
60
72
10
17,177.49
4
$ 954.93
$ 1,309.66
Reimbursable expenses - see breakdown for details
Task 6 - Geotechnical investigation
• • •
0. 1 uotarn existinggeotechnical studies
0
4
0
0
0
$ 409.24
$ 927.63
$ 682.08
6.2 Coordinate preliminary geotechnical review
2
4
0
4
0
6.3 Complete gaotechnical field explorations
2
4
0
0
0
6.3 Complete
gaotechnical recommendations
4
4
0
8
0
-
$ 1,446.02
Reimbursable expenses - see breakdown for details
0
$ 954.93
8.4 Coordinatepreparation of SEPA checklist
2
4
$ 23,762.00
Task Total
8
16
0
12
0
$ 27,226.97
Task 7 - Pavement Investigation
7.1 Coordinate Pavement Testing
7.2 Complete pavement reconnections
Reimbursable expenses - see breakdown for details
Task Total
2
4
0
0
4
4
0
0
Task 8 - Permitting
0 $ 682.08
0 Is 954.93
$ 3,915.00
I $ 5,552.02
v. I rietu reviewproject min fri-ivvA / VVSDOT I 4
0
545.69
8.2 Field review project with resource agencies (est 3
8
4
0
0
0
mtgs)
1,500.62
8.3 KC flood district coordination (2 mtgs)
4
4
0
0
$ 954.93
8.4 Coordinatepreparation of SEPA checklist
2
4
4
4
0
$ 1,227.78
8.5 Coordinatepreparation of Shoreline Permit
4
4
0
0
0
8.6 Document meeting notes
2
8
0
0
4
$ 954.93
$ 1,309.66
Reimbursable expenses - see breakdown for details
$ 19,989.00
Task Total
24
24
4
4
4
$ 26,482.61
11/11/2004
HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
Project: City of Tukwila
Interurban Avenue South
S. 143rd Street to Fort Dent Way
EXHIBIT D -1
KG,
• Architecture •
Landscape Architecture
• Civil Engineering •
Task
Description
*Project
Manager
$ 136.42
Task 9 - Prepare final Plans, Specifications, and Estimates
Labor Hour Estimate
*Project
Engineer *Engineer *
$ 102.31 .$ 75.04.
Technician
$ 31.39
*Admin
$ 54.58
Total Fee
Fee
9 1 , Review previous studies and recommend alignment/slope
stabilization /storm drainage
`
8
12
12
24
0
$ 4,692 80
9.2 Prepare 30% plans for preferred alternatives
40
100
120
200
0
$ 36,969.49
9.3 Prepare Drainage Report
8
20
40
60
4
Task Total
9.4 Identify /coordinate structural design elements
8
12
16
40
0
$ 10,040.54
$ 5,975.13
9.5 Prepare 60'% Plans
40
164
316
364
12
$ 68,946.83
9.6 Prepare 90% Plans
30
180
240
300
12
$ 59,588.07
9 7 Prepare project specifications
20
60
20
0
20
$ 11,459.48
9.6 Quantity ca.culations and cost estimating
8
24
30
30
0
$ 7,639.50
— --
$ 40,057.00
Reimbursable expenses - see breakdown for details
Task Total
162
572
794
1018
48
$ 245,368.84
Task 10 - Right -of -Way
ru.1 rrepare preliminary right- of- wayplans
4
8
0
16
0
$ 2,346.34
$ 2,919.34
10.2 Finalize right -of -way plans
Reimbursable expenses
2
8
8
20
0
- see breakdown for details
_
$ 8,835.00
Task Total
6
16
8
36
0
$ 14,100.68
Total Estimated Fee: $ 434,670.98
Hourly rates are based on the following:
Direct Salary Costs
Overhead Rate
Fixed Fee
$ 48.07 I $ 36.05 I $ 26.44 I $ 21.63 I $ 19.23
153.80%
30%
HOUR AND FEE . � EXHIBIT D-1
ProjeCity of
ct: � — ^��"",p
Interurban Avenue South
S. 143rd Street to Fort Dent — '
Way
• Architecture •
Landscape Architecture
• Civil Engineering II
Reimbursable Breakdown ` ' '. � � �� ^ ` �`
Toeh1' -~~^
--~----~�~~~~'
_
' �neogo ' '� � ` ` � ^^� ` . � '
$ 75.00
Reproduction
' -�� i���1OO�O
r..^^ Total .` - $
'""�''""". '. ' �� ` ' '` '' ', $ '' "r�nm~
Task 2~ base mapping - ' - 175.00
Survey
Mileage
Reproduction . � ' --_
---- ' '^p"""^""''� ' �` �' `'°� `� ' ~ ' p '' $ ' 10000 ~�'
Earth Tech - Topographic ^"~....�.-.' ' $ ''-'--
nro'uun�moa�s .-� - �-� ' `'� � '' � - �' '� $ '`�2.00O�O8
"P, Potholing a
Took2~Tmt | ' / � ' ` $ -'"``~~ ` '
Task 3 Public .—— Total ' ' '' $ . , ` ��17�0V�~�-��
, . �
Mileage � � ` ` `� ^ �
Reproduction ' � '�` ' ` ��� � '.`� ` 75.00 $ 400.00
Task 3 - Total �' '� ' ' '` ' ' ` � 'm `' 47500
Task 4 WSDOT coordination
Mileage ' ` ' � �^ 150.00 .
_
Reproduction � � 200.00
Task 4 Total ---
---^- Utility -- .� uw ` ' $ 350��'
'pm"�-omonommuon`
Mileage
�
Reproduction �
Task 5 - Tot /
Task 6'Geotechniva|Investigation
Mileage $ 35.00
Reproduction
---' $ 50.00
Landau Associates - Geotechnica engineering $ 23677.00
TmmhG - To� $ Total ' 2378�VV
Task 7' Pavement lnxooUgaUon ' '
Mileage 35.00
Reproduction . 50.00
Pavement Engineers - Pavement Testing $ ' -----jj0
"
Task 7'Tot \
^ $ 3�15O0
Task 8'Pwnn|tUnQ ' '
75.00
200.00
275.00
Mileage $ 150J0
Reproduction $ 250.00
Landau Associates - Permit support $ 14'089.00
Earth Tech - River Cross Sections $ 4,900.00'
Task 7 - Total
$ 19.989.00
11/11/2004
HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE EXHIBIT D -1
Project:
City of Tukwila
Interurban Avenue South
S. 143rd Street to Fort Dent Way
KPG
• Architecture •
Landscape Architecture
• Civil Engineering •
Reimbursable Breakdown
Task 9 - Prepare final Plans, Specifications, and Estimates
Mileage
Reproduction
Civiltech - Structural design
Task 9 - Total
Task 10 - Right -of -Way
Mileage
Reproduction
Earth Tech - Right of Way Plans
Task 10 -- Total
Cost
11/11/2004
$ 150.00
$ 5,000.00
$ 34,907.00
$ 40,057.00
$ 35.00
$ 800.00
$ 8,000.00
8,835.00
Total Reimbursable Costs: $ 162,008.00
EXHIBIT D -1
HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE
Project: City of Tukwila
Interurban Avenue South
S 143rd Street to Fort Dent Way
]EC. IP C4-
• Architecture •
Landscape Architecture
• Civil Engineering •
Task Total fee
Task1 - Management/coordination /administration
Task 2 - Survey and base mapping
Task 3 - Public Involvement
Task 4 WSDOT coordination
Task 5 - Utility coordination
Task 6 - Geotechnical Investigation
Task 7 Pavement Investigation
Task 8 - Permitting
Task 9 - Prepare final Plans, Specifications, and Estimates
Task 10 - Right -of -Way
20, 734.18
68,226.59
6,504.87
3,296.74
17,177.49
27,226.97
5,552.02
26,482.61
245,368.84
14,100.68
Total Estimated Fee $ 434,670.98
11/11/2004
Exhibit E
STATEMENTOFDJRECT LABOR, FRINGE BENEFITS, AND GENERAL OVERHEAD
Based on year end December 31,2004
KPG, INC. P.S.
DESCRIPTION
%Of
Direct
Labor
I
ITotal 2002 Salary
I
IDlRECT LABOR
I
FRINGE BENEFITS
Payroll Taxes
Insurance - Medical/Dental/Disability
Paid Leave Vacation/Holiday/ Sick
401K
Employee Bonus
TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS
12.1%
8.1%
13.8%
5.8%
132%
53.0%
GENERAL OVERHEAD
Indirect Labor
Legal & Accounting Services
Automotive & TravelExpenses
Payroll Service
Donations
Conferences
Training/ Education
Organizations
Publications
Business Retreat
Employee Recruitment
Employee Services
Interest Expense
Equipment Support
Professional Licensing
Meals & Entertainment
Off Road Vehicle
Office Supplies
Postage/Shipping
Printing/ Reprographics
Reimbursed Office Expense
Subconsultants
Rent
Repairs & Maintenance
Business T:3xes & Insurance
Communications
Utilities
Depreciation
Cost of Money
Self Insurance
TOTAL GENERAL OVERHEAD
25.6%
1.4%
1.4%
0.2%
0.1%
0.5%
0.6%
0.4%
0.1%
0.9%
0.1%
0.6%
0.0%
9.2%
0.2%
1.6%
0.0%
6.7%
0.3%
2.8%
0.1%
0.0%
18.5%
7.3%
10,3%
1.8%
0.8%
5.1%
0.4%
4.5%
101.9%
2003
Expense
$1,997,125
$1,118,277
135,370
90,273
154,564
64,815
147,522
$ 592,544
286,304
16,081
15,661
2,577
1,025
6,131
7,239
4,940
1,452
10,067
1,008
7,262
352
103,270
2,080
18,384
75,229
3,116
31,197
1,497
206,640
81,917
115,731
20,211
8,519
57,037
4,472
50,000
$1,139,399
Adjustments
$0
$0
(1,025.00)
(352.00)
(9,192.00)
(1,497.00)
($12,066)
2003
Expense
1$1,118,277
135,370
90,273
154,564
64,815
147,522
I $ 592,544
286,304
16,081
15,661
2,577
6,131
7,239
4,940
1,452
10,067
1,008
7,262
103,270
2,080
9,192
75,229
3,116
31,197
206,640
81,917
115,731
20,211
8,519
57,037
4,472
50,000
1$1,127,333
I
". ,'j n$1;i19,877C
IfoTACO=VERHEAD>EXPENSE:. ,'. "..,'.\{s4.88o/D $1,731,9431\T...,.'. '($12,066) .
. '. _,~.. _,. "".,,':__
% Of
Direct
Labor
12.1%
8.1%
13.8%
5.8%
13.2%
53.0%
25.6%
1.4%
1.4%
0.2%
0.0%
0.5%
0.6%
0.4%
0.1%
0.9%
0.1%
0.6%
0.0%
9.2%
0.2%
0.8%
0.0%
6.7%
0.3%
2.8%
0.0%
0.0%
18.5%
7.3%
10.3%
1.8%
0.8%
5.1%
0.4%
4.5%
1 00.8%
....... .......
15:3.80%
Exhibit F
Payment Upon Termination of Agreement
, .By the Agency Other Than for
Fault of the Consultant
(Referto Agreement, Section IX)
LumpSumContracts
A' final payment shall be made to, the CONSUL. TANT which when added to any payments previously made shall
total the same percentage ofthe.Lump Sum Amount as the work completed at the time of ~(,UHination is to the
total work required for the PROm CT. Tn addition, the CONSUL T ANT shall be paid for any authorized extra
work completed.
Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts
Afinalpayment shall be made to the CONSUL T ANT which when added to any payments previously made, shall
. total the actual cc;>sts plus the same percentage of the fixed fee as the work completed at the time of termination is
to the total work required for ,the Project." In addition, the CONSUL T ANT shall be paid for any authorized extra
workcompleted.
Specific Rates of Pay Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSUL,' TANT for actual hours charged at the time of termination of this
AGREEMENT plus any directnonsalal)' costs incurred at the time of termination of this AGRE EMENT.
Cost Per Unit of Work Contracts
A final payment shall be made to the CONSUL. T ANT for actual units of work completed at the time of
termination of this AGRE' EMENT.
Exhibit G
Subcontracted Work
The AGENCY pennits subcontracts for the following portions of the work of this A GRE EMENT:
F~rtnTp,r:b - Snrvp:v
~
P:wement RnO"il1P:f':1"~ -~~tTf':~lnO" ~nrl T)f':~10il
!..- , ~ ~
Clvl1tec:b - Stmetnr::Jl Rnelnf':F1:in~
A PS - TTtl11tvT.()r.~tp.~ I Potllo11np-
~ -
"
Transportation Committee
Noyember 8,2004
Present: .Joan Hernandez, Chair; Pam Carter, Joe Duffie
Pat ,Brodin, RobinTischmak, Jim Morrow, Kevin Fuhrer, Alan Doerschel, Frank
lriarte, Gail Labanara, Lucy Lauterbach
~the I:::i;:;~~V:;:o~~~~n~:~~~t~~:~~~~~~e~~e::;{~~~~~ i~~~~~~ a~r 1:~ing
interviewing five of the fourteen finns that were interested, staff chose KPG by a wide margin.
They scored higher than other companies on every rating criterion. The design and engineering
costs of $434,710.24 are within the project budget, although Joan noticed that in the CIP there is
not money for constructionuntilafter201O. She asked if the design work being done now would
still be useful if construction didn't occur until that many years ahead, and Jim assured her it
would. The Committee approved the scope of work that was included.. Authorize mayor to
shmcontract with KPG for deshmservices for Interurban.
2. SouthcenterParkwav Extension SUDulement David Evans already has a $351,000 contract
to design the extension ofSouthcenter Parkway to the south city limits. Additional design work
is neededforthe sewer line from Minkler to S. 200th and the additional 1,400 feet of roadway to
reach the city's southern boundary, so a supplement to the contract has been prepared. Segale did
some preliminary design work on the sewer, but the majority of design still remains to be done.
A supplement has been negotiated in the amount of $70,615, and is within budget. Advertising
for construction is included in the work. Jim said the City cannot afford to build the road or
sewer without bonds, and we couldn't pay the bond payments without assistance from the TVS
project. Pam pointed out that the only reason forthe sewer project is to serve the TVS project.
The sewer money is within theS. J 80th Street project in the CIP. Recommend authorizint?;
mayor to si2:n suuplement for extension.
3. Tukwila InternationaIBoulevard(TIB) Phases 2 and 3 of the TIB project were previously
discussed inJate2003 andearly2004, but there was not enough money to do both phases, so the
southern section thatwouidcontinue the previous improvements north, had been chosen. Since
the first of the yeartheCityhasreceivedmore funding, and is now able to do both phases, if
some savings are found. The Committee considered the $16.5 m and $16.l5m versions and
recommended the $16.15 million dollar version, and also considered other savings that could be
made if necessary; Move discussion to CO'V.
4. Cascade View Park Cascade View CommunitY,Park construction is complete, and the city is
ready to release the retainage of the contractor. Though the contract was largely done in 2003,
there wereanumberoflandscapeissues that have remained open. Thoseare now resolved, and
the project can be closed out. Joan asked what the $8,571.20 cost overruns were for and ".vas
infonned they were partly for gravel, asphalt and the sidewalk extension. Recommend proiect
acceptance and release of retaina2:e to consent a2:enda of a Re2:ular Meetin2:.
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
4 w ky Initials ITEM NO.
0 1 iZ
1S-1 Meeting Date 1 Prepared by 1 Mayor review 1 Council review
0 N �o� 11/22/04 1 RT 131M lf
L"
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 04-168 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: NOVEMBER 22, 2004
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Southcenter Pkwy Extension Consultant's Supplement
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 11 /22/04
SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P &R. Police PW
SPONSOR'S David Evans Associates' contract No. 04 -025 was for design of the roadway
SUMMARY improvements on Southcenter Parkway Extension. Additional design work is necessary for
the sewer from Minkler Blvd to S 200 St as well as an additional 1,400 feet of roadway to
reach the southern -most City Limit.
REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE: 11/8/04
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMIN. Authorize Mayor to sign Supplement with David Evans Associates
COMMITTEE Approve supplement and forward to COW and then Regular Council
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED CITY FUNDS REQUIRED
$430,192.00 $461,000.00 $111,000
Fund Source: 104.02 Commercial Streets (page 40, 2005 Proposed CIP)
Comments: Supplement No. 1 for $79, 615 bringing the total contract to $430,192,00.
Federal Hwy Surface Transp. Program grant of $200, 000 and State Arterial Program grant of $150, 000.
MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
11/22/04
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
11/22/04 Information Memo dated November 3, 2004
Consultant's Supplement No. 1
Transportation Committee Meeting Minutes from November 8, 2004
INFORMATION MEMO
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor Mullet
Public Works Director
November 3, 2004
Southcenter Parkway Extension - S 180th St to South City Limit~
P .S. &E. Contract- Supplement #1
ISSUE
Authorize the Mayor to sign Contract Supplement #1 with David Evans & Associates, Inc., to
provide additional roadway design and sanitary sewer P.S. & E. for the Southcenter Parkway
Extension project.
BACKGROUND
The City has contracted with David Evans & Associates, Inc., to provide P.S. & E. for the
extension of South center Parkway from S 180th St to the South City Limits. The project design
is being coordiIiated with the proposed Segale development and annexation. Additional design
work is necessary for design of the sanitary sewer from Minkler Blvd to S 200th St as well as
an additional 1,400 feet of roadway design to reach the City's southern-most City Limit.
Preliminary 'design work on the sanitary sewer was prepared by the Segale design team. This
supplement will allow David Evans & Associates to prepare, fmal plans and the specification
manual for bidding and construction. The current contract, Supplement #1, and budget
amounts are:
Contract
Budaet
Existing Preliminary Engineering Contract
Supplement #1
Total
$ 350,577
79.615
$ 430,192
$ 461,000
ANALYSIS
A contractsupplementforpreparationofP.S. & E. has been negotiated in the amount of
$79,615.00. This contract is within budget and will provide design services for the sanitary
sewer line from S 180th St to S 200th St and approximately 1,400 feet of additional roadway
design including. advertisement for construction bids.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the Mayor to sign Contract Supplement #1 with David Evans & Associates, Inc., in
the amount of $79,615.00.
attachment: Consultant Agreement
(P:ProjectsIA- RW & RS Projectsl84RW37 57 Ave ExtlTCMEMO-Sup 1)
. ~.
....
"II
Washington State
Department of Transportation
Organization and Address
Supplemental Agreement
David Evans & aSSOcLates, Inc.
4l~ llHth Ave SE
Bellevue, WA 98005
Attn: Catherine Mirkin, PE
Agreement Number
04-025
Project Number
Phone
(425) 519-6582
Project Title
Southcenter Parkway Extension Project
New Maximum Amount Payable
$ 430,192.00
Description of Work
The supplemental scope of services includes preparation of plans, specifications
and estimates (PS&E).for 7000 If of sanitary sewer main and 1400 If of roadway
widening onSouthcenter Parkway.
The Local Agency of City of Tukwila
desires to supplement the agreement entered into with David Evans & Associates, Inc.
and executed on April 5, 2004 and identified as Agreement No. 04-025'
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
Section 1 , SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changedto read:
Additional work is described in Exhibit B-2
II
..
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for
completion of the work to read: Completion Date: July 1, 2005
III
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows:
Additional payment in the amount of $79,615 shall be added to the contract
(see Exhi.bi.t D-:lJ
as set forth in the attached Exhibit A,and by this reference made a part of this supplement.
If you concur with this supplement and agree to tt,e changes as stated above. please sign in the appropriate spaces
below and return to this office for final action.
By: (afhi'\"in't' e. t'tlr/t.:". D_JJe-vu", I AJ,ft r; By:
(JHAA~ ,;:7h~ L.-~
Consultant Signature
Approving Authority Signature
DOT Form 140-063 EF
Revised 10/97
Exhibit "A"
Summary of Payments
Total
Basic Agreement Supplement #1 Total
$108,162.00 $2b,088.00 $134,250.00
$183,833.00 $44,340.00 $228,173.00
$ 26,133.00 $ 1,360.00 $ 27,493.00
$ J2,449.00 $ 7,827.00 $ 4O~276.00
$350,577.00 $79,615.00 $430,192.00
Direct Salary Cost
Overhead
(Including Payroll Additives)
Direct Non-Salary Costs
Fixed Fee
DOT Form 140-063 EF
Revised 10/97
CITY OF TUKWILAENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES
SOUTHCENTERP ARKW AY EXTENSION PROJECT
SCOPE OF SERVICES
SUPPLEMENT #1
SECTION 1.00 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND DELIVERABLES
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This supplemental scope ,of services includes preparation of plans, specifications and estimates
(PS&E) 'for the sanitary sewermainJrom South 200th Street to Minkler Boulevard (roughly
10,20010 and 1400 If of roadway widening on Southcenter Parkway from the existing south city
limit to the future south city limit. The roadway section will include a five-lane roadway (two
lanes in each direction with a center two-way left turn lane) with curb, gutter and six-foot
sidewalks onthe both sidesofthe road., Other improvements include an enclosed storm drainage
system, illumination,. utility relocations, channelization and signing. Construction documents for
the sanitary sewer main and the additional'1400 If of roadway widening will be incorporated into
the PS&E documents being prepared under the basic scope of services for the Southcenter
Parkway Extension Project.
It is assumed the sanitary sewer main will be a gravity flow system. If a pump station is required
instead ofa gravity main system it will be considered an extra service to provide that design.
1.02 PROJECT DELIVERABLES FURNISHED BY THE CONSULT ANT
The Consultant shall maintain a project file for pertinent work items. These files win be
delivered to the City at the conclusion of the project. In addition to the project files, the
Consultant shall ,deliver the following documents and products to the City as part of this
agreement:
. PS&E contract plans for review at 60% and 90% submittals (25 sets of half-size plans
and 25 specs) and one final set of signed reproducible contract documents (10 full
size plans and 50 half-size final plans and specs
1.03 ITEMS FURNISHED BY THE CITY
. All available "As-Built" information;
. Any applicable preliminary design, geotechnical or environmental documentation;
. CityofTukwilaComprehensive Plan (sanitary sewer section only);and
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
c:\windows\temp\southcenter - supplemental services #1.doc,
Scope of Services
SECTION 2.00 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL
2.01 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Direction of the Consultant staff and review of their work over the course of the Project shall be
provided. This work element includes preparing the monthly progress reports, invoices,
attending progress meetings, and planning work items for the following month.
Periodic monitoring of the Consultant's design budget will occur over the course of the Proj ect.
Current status, as, well as budget projections, will be developed. This work element is intended
to help monitor costs and budgets and to,propose corrective actions. These actions could include
fonnal requests for scope modifications and respective budget adjustments.
Drawings and documents received and generated over the course of the Project will require
review, coordination and file management to be completed by the Consultant.
2.02 COORDINATION MEETINGS
No additional coordination meetings are anticipated for the roadway widening work.
Coordination meetings for the sanitary sewer design is cover under Section 6.
2.03 QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
This task is for QC/QA review of the Consultant's deliverables by a designated QC/QA staff
member. The review shall cover documents, reports, plans, specifications, cost estimates and
pertinent infonnation on an ongoing basis. The QC/QA program entails the periodic review of
study criteria, design, assumptions,.concepts and presentation of product fonnat and assures that
the overall Project objectives are being fulfilled.
The City will provide additional quality review. This will be coordinated with the Consultant
Project Manager and pertinent staff members. Support groups within the City will review and
provide direction of pertinent work items and will coordinate with the Consultant Project
Manager and pertinent staffmernbers.
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
2
c:\windows\templsouthcenter - supplemental services # \.doc
Scope of Services
3.01 BASEMAPPING
The basemapping for the. 1400 lfofroadway widening has been completed by Segale Business
Park (SBP) and shall be made available to the Consultant.
The Consultant shall prepare the base map for the sanitary sewer design from South 180th Street
to Minkler Blvd usingtheSBP, survey, info and City of Tukwila GIS info. If additional
topographic survey is necessary, to complete the, sanitary sewer design, the survey work will be
covered under Section 3.0l of the basic services agreement for the Southcenter Parkway
Extension Project.
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
3
c:lwindowsltemplsouthcenter - supplemental services #\.doc.
Scope of Services
SECTION 4.00 DESIGN
The Consultant shall design and prepare roadway plan/profiles from the existing south city limit
an additional 1400 ,If to the'so':!thand sanitary sewer main plans from South 200th Street to
Minkler Boulevard.
4.01 REVIEW EXISTING DATA AND ESTABLISH DESIGN STANDARDS
The Consultant shall review the following documents for relevant geometric design criteria and
establish applicable design standards for: the project.
. SouthcenterParkwayExtension Design 'Report;
. City of Tukwila Engineering Design and Development Standards;
. AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of highways and Streets (1994);
. WSDOT Design Manual;
. WSDOT Local Agency Guidelines, and
. Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
Particular emphasis shall be, placed ,on identifying those elements that may be subject to
interpretation, engineering judgment or modification due to adverse field conditions. All
elements shall be reviewed with City staff prior to the start of detailed design.
In preparation of the sanitary , sewer main design the Consultant shall review the following
documents:
. CityofTukwilaComprehensive Plan (Sanitary Sewer Service)
. Department of Ecology Design Criteria for Sewerage Works
. City of Kent Comprehensive Plan (Sanitary Sewer Service)
. SegaleProperty EIS (for sanitary sewer loadings)
The Consultant shall prepare all drawings using AutoCAD R2000 in conformance with City
standards. Project schedules shall be prepared using Microsoft Project, spreadsheets in Microsoft
Excel and text documents in Microsoft Word.
4.02 PROJECT SITE VISITS (2 TOTAL)
The Consultant shall conduct one site visit with City maintenance, design, and construction staff
to review and discuss design considerations. Where appropriate, elements identified by these site
visits will be incorporated into design.
The Consultant shall. conduct one additional site visit with City staff to resolve design questions
and issues.
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
4
c:lwindowsllemplsouthcenler. supplemental services #I.doc.
Scope of Services
, ,...'"
4.03 INTERMEDIATEUESIGN (60% COMPLETION)
The Consultant shalLdevelop the design to a 60% completion level, and participate in a review
coordination meeting to respond to City staff questions and comments (covered under the basic
services). The City will provide one consolidated set of review comments. Review comments
will be responded to and incorporated as applicable into the design. The 60% design will include
the following elements, as a minimum, prepared by the Consultant:
. Roadway plans and profiles (4 sheets);
. Miscellaneous details(l sheet);
. Channelization and signing plans (2 sheets);
. Illumination plans (2 sheets);
. Temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans (4 sheets);
. Sanitary sewerrmiinplanandprofiles (20 sheets);
. Sanitarysewer main details (1 sheet);
. Construction Cost Estimate; ,and
. Specifications
4.04 FINAL DESIGN (90% COMPLETION)
The Consultant shall prepare a complete'design for review by the City and participate in a review
coordination' meeting to respond to 'City, staff questions and comments (covered under the basic
services). The City will provide one consolidated set of review comments. Review comments
will be responded to and incorporated as applicable into the design. The 90% design shall include
the following elements,' asa minimum, prepared by the Consultant:
. Roadwayplans and profiles (4 sheets);
. Miscellaneousdetails (I sheet);
. Channelization and signing plans (2 sheets);
. Illumination plans (2 sheets);
. Temporary erosion/sedimentation control plans (4 sheets);
. Sanitary sewer ma.in plan and profiles (20 sheets);
. Sanitary sewer main details (I sheet);
. Construction Cost Estimate; and
. Specifications
The Consultant shall calculate quantities and prepare a detailed construction cost estimate.
4.05 PREPARE FINAL CONTRACT DOCUMENTS (100% COMPLETION)
The Consultant shall prepare final contract documents in accordance with City's review
comments from the final design coordination meeting and in accordance with regulatory agency
pennit conditions. The following work shall be completed as part of the final contract document
preparation:
. Plan modifications and/or revisions in response to City review comments from the
final design coordination meeting;
. Final design ofproject elements;
DAVID EV ANSAND ASSOCIATES, INC.
5
c:lwindowsltemplsouthcenter - supplemental services #\.doc,
Scope of Services
. SpeciaF>provisionsand listing of City standard specifications, with fill-ins, to be
iIlcorporated.in the construction contract documents, and
. Prepare a final (100% Completion) list of bid items, quantities, and a construction
cost,estimate for a set of signed and reproducible construction contract documents.
The Consultant shall assemble all plan sheets, general and special provisions, cost estimate, and
associated documentation ,for" submittal as an Ad Ready PS&E package. The Consultant shall
prepare the advertisement ,'for ,bid and reproduce the construction documents. The City will
distribute plans and specifications to prospective bidders.
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
6
c;lwindowsltemplsouthcenter - supplemental services #\.doc,
Scope of Services
SECTIONS.OO UTILITY COORDINATION
It is assumed the utility coordination work for the 1400 lf of roadway widening can be completed
under the basic sc:opeofservices. The Consultant shall provide additional coordination and
participate in meetings as required to identify, existing utilities, determine and resolve utility
conflicts with the proposed sanitary sewer design.
5.01 NOTIFICATION.oF UTILITIES
The Consultant shall notify the City and franchise utility companies of the sanitary sewer design
and arrange to have, the utility locations surface marked and request utility as-builts. The City
and Consultarit shall collaborativelydevelopa list of utility companies within the existing City
right-of-way. The Consultant shall contactthe utility companies.
5.02 COORDINATION MEETINGS
It is assumed that no additional coordination meetings will be required for the 1400 lf of roadway
widening, and any coordination ' for the sanitary sewer,main design will be consolidated into the
roadway coordination meetings identified in the basic scope of services.
5.03 UTILITY COORDINATION
The Consultant shall. prepare the, roadway widening and sanitary sewer main design to avoid
known utility conflicts if practical. The Consultant and the City shall identify utilities that need
to be potholed.Potholingwill be completed by an AirN ac System. The Consultant shall meet
with each affected utility company one (1) time in the office and one (1) time in the field. The
City will pothole city-owned , utilities if necessary~ Franchise utilities will pothole their own
utilities if necessary at their own expense.
All utility conflicts shall be identified and potholed prior to submittal of 60% plans.
The Consultantshall provide hard copies and electronic files of proposed plans to the utility
companies. Plan will be provided at the 60% and 90% submittals.
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
7
c:lwindowsllemplsouthcenler - supplemental services 1# \.doc
Scope of Services
SECTION 6.00, AGENCY COORDINATION
The Consultant shall' provide"agency coordination and participate in meetings as required to
ensure full coordination with local agencies.
6.01 COORDINATION WITH CITY OF TUKWILA UTIL TIES
The basic scope of servicesinc1udedConsultant participation in up to two (2) meetings with the
City, of Tukwila Utilities Department to provide coordination for the horizontal and vertical
aligmnent of the proposed sanitary sewer line proposed along the Southcenter Parkway
Extension. It is anticipated an additional two (2) meetings will be required with the City Utilities
Department to complete the design work.
6.02 COORDINATION WITH CITY OF KENT/KING COUNTY
The basic scope of services included Consultant participation in up to two (2) meetings with the
City of Kent and King County regarding potential improvements south of the City of Tukwila
City limits. It is anticipated these two meetings will be sufficient to coordinate the complete
sanitary sewerdesigh.
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INe.
8
c:lwindowsltemplsouthcenter - supplemental services # l.doc,
Scope of Services
~"-
SECTION 7.00 PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNER COORDINATION
The Consultant shall coordinate, the design of the sanitary sewer main with the private property
improvements adjacent to the SouthcenterParkway Extension project.
7.01 COORDINATION WITH LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
The Consultant shall participate in up to two (2) meetings with SBP to coordinate potential
developmenfwith the sanitary sewer main design. The Consultant shall prepare meeting minutes
and distribute them to theCitywithin five (5) days of the meeting.
The Consultant shall also work withiexisting developments between South 180th Street and
Minkler Boulevard that are impacted by the sanitary sewer main design.
7.02 DESIGN ISSUES WITH LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
The Consultant shall address and coordinate design issues that arise between the potential private
developmenLand the SouthcenterParkwayExtension project. The Consultant shall work with
the private' property ownertoprovide sanitary sewer service stub locations and inverts. The
Consultant shall also work with the private property owner to coordinate frontage improvements
along the 1400 If or roadway widening.
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
9
c:lwindowsllemplsoulhcenler - supplemental services #1.doc.
Scope of Services
Task
Exhibit D -2
Southcenter Parkway Extension Project
Supplemental Services #1
Estimated Person -hours Summary
Sr. Des. Sr CAD CAD Sr. Traf Traff. Land. Sr. Env. Sr. Scientist
Env.
Survey Survey
QC PM Engr. Engr. Drftr. Drftr. Engr. Engr. Arch. Plan. Scientist
Tech.
Mang. Office
2.00 Project Administration
2.01 Project management
2.02 Coordination meetings
2.03 Quality assurance review
3.00 Base Mapping
Establish survey control
Perform limited topo survey
Field verify base maps
4.00 DESIGN
4.01 Review existing data / Establish design standards
4.02 Project site visits
4.03 60 %Design
$50 $46 $36 $30 $28 $22 $40 $29 $35 $43 $35 $28
1,. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 14
Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total
hrs hrs hrs ` hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs
$26
$45 $29
12
Roadway plans /profiles 6
Channelization and signing plans 2
Illumination plans
Termporary ESC plans
Landscape and irrigation plans and details 4
Sanitary sewer plans 8 12 40 4 60
Sanitary sewer details 4 8 4 16
2
12
16
8
16
8
8
8
Specifications
Engineer's estimate / quantities
4.04 90% Design
Roadway plans /profiles
4
8
20
15
Total
hrs
16 17
Total
hrs
Survey Suprt
Crew Staff
$40 $20.
18 19
Total
hrs
DEA
Total
Total
hrs.
2
2
22
16
12
46
22
22
22
12
124
32
16
32
Channelization and signing plans
Illumination plans
Temporary erosion control Fans
Engineer's estimate / quantities 2 4 16
Landscape and irrigation plans and details 2
16 16
8 12
2 4
8
Sanitary sewer plans
Sanitary sewer details
Specifications
6
4
24 48
2 8 8 16
4.05
Final Contract Documents (l00 %)
Final roadway plan and profiles
Final sanitary sewer plans
Final Engineer's cost estimate / quantities
Final specifications
4
38
22
14
22
22
14
86
34
16
5.00 Utilities Coordination
5.01 Notification of utilities
2
12
12
8
12
24
28
40
10
4 14
16
6;?
vzi
10
Page 1
11/17/7004
Exhibit D -2
Southcenter Parkway Extension Project
Supplemental Services #1
Estimated Person -hours Summary
Engr.
$36
3
Engr.
$30
4
Sr CAD
Sr. Traf
Traff.
Land.
Drftr.
$28
5
Drftr.
$22
6
Engr.
$40
7
Engr.
$29
8
Arch.
$35
9
Sr. Env.
Scientist
Plan.
$43
12
Scientist
$35
13
Total
hrs
Total
hrs
Total
hrs
Total
hrs
Total
hrs
Total
hrs
Total
hrs
Total
hrs
Total
hrs
Total
hrs
Total
hrs
Total
hrs
Tech.
$26
15
Total
hrs
Mang.
$45
16
Total
hrs
Total
Crew
$40
18
Total
Suprt
Staff
$20
19
Total
hrs
Total
5.02 Coordination meetings
5.03 Utility design/coordination
Total
hrs
32
"x^ 42
6.00 Agency Coordination
6.01 Coordination with City of Tukwila utilties
6.02 Coordination with Cit of Kent/Kin County
7.00 Private Property Owner Coordination
7.01 Meetings w/ property owners
7.02 Design coordination with property owners
Page 2 11/12/2004
EXHIBIT D-2
SOllthcenter Parkway Extension Project.. Estimated Person-hours/Costs Summary
Supplemental Services #1
Summary
Classification Hrs. x Rate = Cost
1 PrincipallQuality Control 6 $50.00 $300
2 Project Manager 116 $46.00 $5,336
3 Sr; Engineer 142 $36.00 $5,112
4 Design Engineer 242 $30.00 $7,260
5 Sr CADD Drafter 8 $28.00 $224
6 CAPD Drafter 276 $22.00 $6,072
7 Sr. Traffic Engineer 4 $40.00 $160
8 Traffic Engineer 16 $29.00 $464
9 Landscape Architect 16 $35.00 $560
12 Senior Environmental Planner 0 $43.00 $0
13 Senior Scientist 0 $35.00 $0
14 Scientist 0 $29.00 $0
15 Environmental Tech 0 $26.00 $0
16 Survey Manager 0 $45.00 $0
17 Survey Office 0 $29.00 $0
18 Survey Crew 0 $40.00 $0
19 Support I Clerical 30 $20.00 $600
Total Hrs. 856
Overhead Cost' @
Net Fee .@
Subtotal
169.96% of Direct Labor
30.00% of Direct Labor
$26,088
$44,340
$7,827
$78,255
Direct Salary Cost
Direct Non..salary Cost
a) Reproduction, Plans
Reports
b) Deliveriesl Mail
c) Travel (Personal Miles)
d) Utility locate (APS)
e) Potholing (APS)
Subtotal
800 Sheets @ $0.75 ISheet $600
o Each @ $45.00 lEach $0
2 Each @ $15.00 lEach $30
100 Miles @ $0.30 IMile $30
2 holes @ $350.00 hole $700
$1,360
Hrs.
$79,615
Total
Updatad 1/8/99
Printed 11/12/2004
"
Transportation Committee
November 8, 2004
Present:
Joan Hernandez, Chair; Pam Carter, Joe Duffie
Pat Brodin, RobinTischmak, Jim Morrow, Kevin Fuhrer, Alan Doerschel, Frank
lriarte,Oail Labanara, Lucy Lauterbach
1. Interurban Avenue South Desi!!nThe cityhas received a $396,000 federal grant for funding
the design of road improvements on Interurban Avenue S. from 143rd to Fort Dent Way. After
interviewingfiveofthe fourteenfirmsthat were interested, staff chose KPO by a wide margin.
Theyscored higher than other companies on every rating criterion. The design and engineering
costs of $434,710.24 are withintheproject budget, although Joan noticed that in the CJP there is
notmoneyfor construction until after201O. She asked if the design work being done now would
still be useful ifconstruction didn't occur until that many years ahead, and Jim assured her it
would. The Committee approved the scope of work that was included.. Authorize mayor to
shm contractwithKPG fordeshm services for Interurban.
2.' SouthcenterParkwavExtension SuoplementDavid Evans already has a $351,000 contract
to design theextensionof~outhcenter Parkway to the south city limits. Additional design work
is needed for the sewer line from Minkler to S.200th and the additional 1 ,400 feet of roadway to
reach the city's southern boundary, so a supplement to the contract has been prepared. Segale did
some preliminarydesignworkonthe sewer, but the majority of design still remains to be done.
A supplement has been negotiated inthe amount of $70,615, and is within budget. Advertising
for construction is included in the work. Jim said the City cannot afford to build the road or
sewer without bonds, and wecouldn't pay the bond payments without assistance from the TVS
project. Pam pointed outthat the only reasonfor the sewer project is to serve the TVS project.
The sewer money is within the S.180th Street project in the CJP. Recommend authorizint!;
mavor tosi!!n supolement for extension.,
3. Tukwila International Boulevard (TIB} Phases 2 and 3 of the TIB project were previously
discussed in late 2003 and early 2004, but there was not enough money to do both phases, so the
southern section that would continue the previous improvements north, had been chosen. Since
the first of the year the City has received more funding, and is now able to do both phases, if
some savings are found.' The Committee considered the $16.5 m and $l6.15m versions and
recommended the $16.15 million dollar version, and also considered other savings that could be
made if necessary., Move discussion to COW"
4. Cascade View Park Cascade View Community ,Park construction is complete, and the city is
ready to release theretainage of the contractor. Though the contract was largely done in 2003,
there were a number of landscape issues that have remained open. Those are now resolved, and
the project canbe closed out Joan a.skedwhat the $8,571.20 cost overruns were for and \vas
informed they were partly for gravel, asphalt and the sidewalk extension. Recommend Droiect
acceDtance and release of retaina!!eto consent a!!enda of a Re!!ular Meetin2,
,'~
VILA, yv COUNCIL JCL AGE A JC ..L `4+ ®�sis
g sti
o y L ITEM NO.
-i i P1) 4 Meeting Date 1 Prepared by 1 Mayor's review Council review
`�I s 0
z 10/25/04 LL /k,o.�i I tom-►. (4. 1
11/01/04 bb for LL 1� %ih I
rsoe I i Q I C Li 1 h am j j /4 14 1
ii X1610 4 41-- tit
1 11/ l�
ITEM INFORMATION
CAS NUMBER: 04-149 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 10/25/04
AGENDA ITEM TITLE Review of 2005 Budget and 2005 -2010 CIP
CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other
Mtg Date 10/25/04 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date
SPONSOR Ei Council .v El Mayor Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal P &R Police P1V
SPONSOR'S
SUMMARY Review of proposed budget and /or CIP (refer to attached memo for
specific items to be reviewed this week).
REVIEWED BY 1 COW Mtg. (10 -25) CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte
Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm.
DATE:
RECOMMENDATIONS:
SPONSOR /ADMI■. Review budgets
CoMMIi Two committees have started their budget reviews
COST IMPACT FUND SOURCE
EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED
Fund Source:
Comments:
MTG. DATE I RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION
10/25/04 I Discussion held. Council consensus existed to forward the item to the Nov. 1
Regular meeting for additional discussion, edits, etc.
11/1/04 I Continued review and discussion.
11/8/04" 1 Continued review and duscussion.
MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS
10/25/04 Memo from Lucy Lauterbach dated October 20, 2004
Minutes from Finance and Safety Committee (10- 18 -04)
Minutes from Utilities Committee (10- 19 -04)
11/01/04 Memorandum to Council from Lauterbach /Doerschel dated November 1, 2004.
11/8/04 Memorandum to Council from Lauterbach /Doerschel dated November 3, 2004_
11/15/04 Memorandum to Council from Lauterbach./t)oerschel dated November 15, 2004
1.1 /22 /na Memo from K FjhrPr, A_ Doerschel I I auterhach bated 11/18/04.
To:
From:
LucyLauterbach
Kevin Fuhrer
Date:
November22,2004~
Subject:
. . FInal Reviewof2005 Bude:et
You're just about fil1ishedwith reviewing the budget. If you can get through these budgets
Monday, you'll be able to relax about budgets and CIPs until next year.
Planning Commission
DCD Administration
Planning
Code Enforcement
Permit Coord., Building
p. 36
pp,71-79
pp. 74-75
p.76
pp. 77.70
Mondav. November 22
Budget Pages
CIP. Pages
Cascade View Drainage Project-Surface Water section
General Govemment-(projects from where Cascade View funding will be taken)
Budget Pages
Public Works
Residential Streets
Bridges and Streets
Water
Sewer
Water/Sewer Construct
Utility Bond & Reserve
Surface Water
Equipment Rental
pp.1l9-133
pp.138-139
pp.140-142
pp.155-157
pp. 158-159
pp. l60-l6l
pp; l62-163
pp.<l68-'l7l
pp. 173-l74
.;~;~.;,-/,'"
#2
r-1 D) Ti:\
JU JJ Ll-J
-;J [J
?
...J -'
AN. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY OF
TUKWILACOMPREHENSIVE PLAN INCOMPLIANCE WITH
THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE GRO\i\'TH MANAGEMENT ACT,
PER .RCW 36.70A.130; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND
ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. .
WHEREAS, per RCW 36.70A.130 (4), the Growth Management Act (GMA) of 1990
requires the City of Tukwila to review and, if needed, revise its Comprehensive Plan
and development regulations by December I, 2004, to ensure that the Comprehensive
Plan and t."I1.e development regulations are in compliance with the req"!!irements of t.."I1.e
GMA;and
WHEREAS, per RCW 36.70A.130, amendments to the Comprehensive Plan shall
not be considered more frequently than once every year, except in cases of emergency
or to amend the Shoreline Master Program; and
WHEREAS, all proposed amendments have been found to be consistent with each
other and to conform overall to the Comprehensive Plan's provisions through the
current planning period; and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act requires each jurisdiction to establish
public participation procedures whereby amendments and updates to the
Comprehensive Plan are considered by the City of Tukwila (RCW 36.70A.130(2); and
WHEREAS, on March 15, 2004, the City of Tukwila passed Resolution No. 1545
adopting a work plan and public participation process for updating the Comprehensive
Plan and development codes per RCW 36.70A.130; and
'WHEREAS" duringt..f1.e Comprehensive Plan and development code update
process,' the City of Tukwila provided a procedure to solicit public input and publicized
the update efforts' through special direct mailings, articles in uThe Hazelnut"
community newsletter, and onthe City's website; and
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila Planning Commission, City Council and staff held
public meetings, public hearings and open houses; and
WHEREAS, the City or Tukwila, in compliance with RCW 36.70A.215, has adopted
reasonable measures to provide sufficient development capacity to accommodate its
targetfor the 2001-2022 planning perlod of 3,200 households; and
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila, in compliance with RCW 36.70A215, has
demonstrated sufficient development capacity to accommodate its target for the 2001-
2022 planning period of 16,000 jobs, as documented in the 2002 King County Buildable
Lands Evaluation Report and determined through subsequent analyses undertaken to
assess the need for adoption of reasonable measures; and
WHEREAS, on May 4, 2004, the City of Tukwila issued an addendum to the
Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statement (previously issued
October 9, 1995) which analyzed the potential impact of various Comprehensive Plan
Comp Plan Amend-GMA 11/18/04
Page 1 on
C:1mendmetlts,. pursuant to SEPA (Chapter 197-11 WAC) and the Tukwila Municipal
Code, Title 21; and
WHEREAS, on August 2, 2004, the City of TukwiIa provided the required 60-day
notification to the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic
Development . (CTED) 'of 'proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan under
RCW 36;70A106; and
WHEREAS, on September 1, 2004, the City of Tukwila provided the required 60-
day notification to ,the Washington State Department of CTED of proposed amend-
ments to the Natural Environment element of the Comprehensive Plan and the
Sensitive Areas Ordinance under RCW 36.70A.I06; and
WHEREAS, on September 9,2004, the City of Tukwila received comments from the
Washington State Department of CTED, which indicated that the proposed update
demonstrated consistency WiUl ihe requirements of the Growth Managemeni: Act and
with the Countywide Planning Policies; and
WHEREAS" the. City of Tukwila analyzed and incorporated best available science
in its'arialysis of the. Natural Environment Element and the Sensitive Areas Ordinance
per the requirements of RCW36.70.A172.. and RCW 36.70.A175; and
WHEREASf the Tukwila Planning Commission held a public hearing on draft
changes to the Natural Environment Element and the Sensitive Areas Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council, held a public hearing on recommended
changes to the Natural Environment Element and the Sensitive Areas Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, on October 4, 2004, the City of Tukwila received comments on the
draft Natural Environment, Element and Sensitive Areas Ordinance from the
Washington Department of Ecology, and responded to the comments on October 15,
2004; and
WHEREAS, on October 21, 2004, the City of Tukwila received comments on the
draft Natural Environment Element and Sensitive Areas Ordinance from the
,Washington State Department of CTED; and
WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila intends to complete its review and to finalize and
adopt revisions to the Sensitive Areas Ordinance as soon as possible and not later than
March31, 2005; and
WHEREAS, at theconc1usion of its review and deliberation on November 8,2004,
the City Council approved the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan as shown in the
attached Exhibits A through L incorporated by this reference;
NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T,UKWILAf
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Transportation Element of the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan
is hereby amended as shown in Attachment A.
Section 2. The Utilities 'Element of the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan,
induding updated figures for Sewer, Water and Electricity Providers, is hereby
amended as shown in Attachment B.
Section 3. The Capital Facilities Element of the City of Tukwila Comprehensive
Plan is hereby amended as shown in Attachment C.
Section 4. The Tukwila Urban Center Element of the City of Tukwila
Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as shown in Attachment D.
,', Se\:tion 5. The Housing Element of the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan is
hereby amended as shown in Attachment E.
Page 2 of 3
.
Section 6. , The Maintenance "of the Plan Element of the City of Tukwila
Comprehensive Plan ishereby amended as shown in Attachment F.
Section 7. The Economic Development Element of the City of Tukwila
Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as shown in Attachment G.
Section 8. The Natural Environment Element of the City of Tukwila
Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as shown in Attachment H.
Section 9. The Tukwila South Element of the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan,
induding a new figure describing the Tukwila South Master Plan area, is hereby
a'lYLellded as- sl-lo\(v~rl iri Atta,cbJTLei-lt 1.
Section ,10. The Residential, Neighborhoods Element of the City of Tukwila
, Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended as shown in Attachment J.
Sedibnl1.The Glossary of the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Plan is hereby
amended as shown in Attachment K.
Section 12. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Legend is hereby amended as
shoWrtinAttachment L.
Section 13. TheComprehensive Plan Map is hereby amended to show revised
Tukwila. South Master Plan area boundary and revised Potential Annexation Area as
shown in Attachment Iv!.
Section 14. The Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map is hereby amended,
as shown in Attachment N, to designate the entire parcel number #740600602, generally
located ,', at' the western' terminus of South 126th Street and between Tukwila
International' Boulevard 'and 34th, Avenue South, as Manufacturing Industrial
Center/Light, rather than having a split designation of Low-Density Residential,
Commercial Light/Industrial, and Manufacturing Industrial Center/Light.
Section 15. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to
be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
reIIlairiing portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 16. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published
in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days
,after passage and publication as provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Special Meeting thereof this day of .2004.
ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED:
Steven M. Mullet, Mayor
Jane E.Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number:
Office of the City Attorney
Comp Plan Amend-GMA 11-04
Page 3 of3
',."
",,' ,.-
,'. " .... - ~~. .-..:
TABB
UTILITIES ELEMENT
(Insert on page 15)
-:-.' "..".;... ,~,;.,..::--:.
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Utilities
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
.... Response plan for water emergencies
.... Ap operations maintenance manual and program
.... Awater qualityrnonitoring program
.... vvater reuse as a water supply source
.... Private wells where approved by the appropriate
authority
.... A water line replacement/enhancement program for
deficient single-family residential areas
....
Sewer Utility
12. 1. 2.a1 Serve all existing and potential residences and
businesses, with a sewer utility.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
.... Aschedule and strategy to prioritize bringing sewer
service to homes and businesses currently on septic
systems
Suriace<Water ivianagement Utility
12.1.2.eQ. Serve all Tukwila's residences and businesses with a
storm and surface water utility.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
.... Atomprehensive surface water management plan
consistent with other regulatory requirements to
improve water quality
15
Planning Commission and City Council Recommendations-November 9, 2004
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Utilities
12. 1.2+9. Providecapital,mainfenance, education, and
enforcementprograms as a function of the storm and
surface water management utility.
. . . -,.
IMPLEMENT ATlONSTRA TEGIES
. Require mitigation approval and funding for wetland
and watercourse impacts prior to development
. A signageprogrClmidentifyingimportant surface
drainage connections and corridors
12. 1.28ZRequfre thatne~"l developmonts IOC3te required storm
wator m3n3gementfacflities on siteun!e~~ ~ rogiona!
f3Ci!fty bonofittln; ~ drainage !:;~~!n fs constructed, or
storagolspro./food fnthe rfvor, or. it !~ ~ ~!ng!{) famf!y
short p!3t orsmal!er resfoontia! dO'.Ie/opment.
Reauireonsite retention and treatment of surface water
forbothdevelooment and redevel60ment oraiects. unless
a reaional facilitv benefitina a drainaae basin is
constructed orstoraae is orovided in the
Green/Duwamish River
12.1.2911 Seek, design, and Implement flood hazard reduction
projects that are permanent, low maintenance flood
protection solutions that meet multiple objectives such as
flood control, water supply storage, water quality,
recreation and fisheries protection.
12.1.;#}29Uso the Department of Eco!ogy stormV'13ter m3nagoment
standardD ~:;' ~,:17infmum for a!! project:;, ~nd where
3ppropri3te, consider utilization of other, mora strfngent
st3nck1rds, suc.f.;~:; portions of KingCou!;t:/~ Stormw3ter
Dosfgn M3nua!
ADDlv an adopted sUrface water desian manual as the
minimum reauirement for all develooment
and other actions that could cause or worsen floodinG,
erosion. water aualitv and habitat Droblems. for both
uDstream and downstream develooment.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
.Stormwater management plan
16
Planning Commission and City Council Recommendations-November 9, 2004
..
',- -. '.
--'.-." -.' _' ':),'._'.,-:..--_-,--,
--"-<"',< ;....'.'.;_
TAB I
TUKWILA SOUTH ELEMENT
(Insert between pages 3 and 4)
.J
, _.:.."~_'- '.'..'_"'_'._'"'.'._"
-'.
~'-/t' U1 (~~
- - ',--.- ~.
i~
~
Ir
r
-
:.
3
~
Figure:
Tukwila South Master Plan "I' :
Boundary Area ·
III I I ,
TAB'M
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
Department of Homeland Security
12500 Tukwila International Boulevard
Department of Homeland Security
12500 Tukwila International Boulevard r i Landscape SchedulE JTAL. SO. PT. OP LANDSCAPE 167,136 SO. FT.
fir+ QUANTITY BIFTl
CfP9C NAAC COtyt•AON NAM 81/IXJrC7ITKJN
F iY O DECIDUOUS TREES SPACING AS 8440444 ON 1
O Acer nbrum 'Mmstreng' Armstrong Rlyd Hap,'. 2' caliper, 1113'-12' ht., full,
I I 616
y 0 Acer clrelnatum 14ns Maple 6' 6' ht, mutttstwm, min (3)
5 p obi 616, nursery grout
illigliF Corms kousa Korea Dogwood BID capper, 6' -1V' I^t.,Nil
SD Fr/minus taltfalla q Ash 7' caliper, 10' -t2' ht,Nlt, w
ems
t— I a Minn calleryana 'Aristocrat' Aristocrat Plea 2 caliper, 10' -12' ht. lull, I
13/6
(-4- ta,.rcus rubes Rod Pak 2' -4' caliper (at owner's
12'44' ht.. Nil, well- brandy
6413
l.lkova serrate 'village Green' dawt.afS.kova 2' caliper, 10'-12' 1•t, NII,
gyp �e
O
0 CE !Abu* EV1i TREES 6PACINc3 AS 614cttN ON F
Mere Auetrlan Bteok /Oils 6' 6' bidet, full and bush 616
b a Psudoteuga mertttesll Doug /as P/r 6' -6' Fright, full and bush
r.-+' PP"��99 0 6/13
a i Pk".0 contorts d',cr. P% bud"
6 hetet, full and bu
h 616
E Ctpressocyparls leylandli Leyland glens., b' -14' height SPECIMENS,
to base, 6/13
6PACNG AS NOTED
S42t,BS
O Taxer media 'Nld.all' Wrote Yea 4 6' hrleht full and bushy
1 1346 or container
Arbutus tr.do 'coepacta' Coslbact Strawberry Bush 24 -30' height. full and bu
1345 or co/Rainer, planted
Cletus ptapureus leockros. M3" -16" height" NII and but
DID or certain/1r, planted
Cams mss Can.11an Cherry 545
height NII, wail-bran isle or container, planted
cid 0 Corals stotonit.ra 1K.Is.yl' lewd Nalg Dogwood 11-13' height, full and bush
6413 or containter, planted
Coitus stolonlf.ra 'Ismail' Rbd T 1g D-„,---'
24 -30' h galFti., 11,11 and bu
616 or conl planted
Cotoneestar lacteu• Pem.y Coicneastw- 24' -30” hatght and spr.a
6113 or contain., planted
Q Euon,f'us stela 'Coepaeta' Dining Moth 24 30' Fright Nit and bu
container, planted 4'oc.
CD O Forsythia interm.dta F o r s y t h i a 24 -30' het. NIl and bu
container, a 6' cc.
0 Lonicera pats P•rnnet Meneysvakke 24 30' height, Nil and bu
o� container, planted D' or..
? 0 tubercle actulfollum Q y drape, 74 -30' height full and bu
container, planted 4' oe.
u 0M Mylce 1 (rc, nIca Pacific Wax 'Vile 24 height full and bu
h'"� contab.r, planted 4' oc.
L, 0 NandMa d. 'Conpacta' Weave* a 1..,... 24 -30' height, full and bu
t"�" container, planted 3' cc.
Q Prunus lusttanlca P!a1uga/ Law/ 74 -30' Fright full and bu
C."1"%. canlatner, planted 4' or;
o Prunus laur ocerasus 'Otto Luykan' Otto Lusaka., Lours,/ 16 -24' sprad, lull and bus
container, planted 3' oz.
v Primus tenroc.erasus 'Zab.ila Zs'.l Lau-sr/ 24 -30' spread, full and b
container, planted 4' one.
0 Florio f=orest Flame' Forest Plane Marra 16 -74" spread, full and bu
cc ntatn.r, planted 3' or.
Phododend c,n 'Anah Kriedi e' Anah k5luc'ike Ahootr 24.30' hi. and spread, NI
616 or container, plantee
O eplr.a nippentca '6n r%o nd' 6 rd Spiro, 21' -24' height MI and bu
container, planted 3' ee,
0 Viburnum pllcatum tomentosun Doubkelle Vibunun 24 -30' ht. and spewed, N
616 or container, Marilee
(1 e/ el O '11 t, n tkus 'bprkng 6oucruet' Opekg Covyw( Vilm.naer 24 -30' N and spread, fu
"I W 0 616 or container, planter
(7 Iv r• W 0 Viburnum davidil [Arvid lnburx•n i6' -I6' hi. and spread, full
(7 616 or container, ptantec
0 F22OtADCOVERS it/ERE Ced OLNOCO -E /a 1/4CVN it S AVULD OE rtAnnED tin
a td
CY
c r��W Minus ealyetnotde. /'a -sable 4' pots at 24' on center
.4 r R•11 Cotoneaster da,n nori 'Lowrast' lsevrborry Coldnwsstr
r L 1r�rL 11 Fragarla chilo.nsis peach Strawberry
L96-0043 Pacific Highway Revitalization
Change 57th Avenue South to Southcenter Parkway
L99-0092 Change East Marginal and Interurban Island from MIC to LDR
L01-075 Change parcels located between South 139th Street South 140th Street from LDR to C/LI
Comprehensive Plan Designations Vicinity Map
Tentative Agenda Schedule
11th;...
Veterans' Day
(City offices
dosed)
25th & 26th -
Thanksgiving
and day after
(City offices
dosed)
Dec.
24th -
Christmas Day
observed
31st - New
Year'sDay
observed
(City offices
dosed)
Jan.
17th - M.L.
King, Jr. Day
(City offices
dosed)
SEE AGENDA PACKET
FOR THIS WEEK'S
AGENDA
23 (Tuesday)
Special Mtg @ 6:30 PM:
Comprehensive
Plan amendments
(Sensitive Areas
Ordinance)
29
5TH MONDAY OF THE
MONTH;
No Council Mtg.
Scheduled
6
Public Hearing:
Street vacation for
Maule Avenue
(Radovich piece between
143rd&144th)
13
Special Meeting to
follow COW...
Unfinished Business:
Ordinance approving
street vacation for
Maule Avenue
(Radovich piece between
143rd& 144th)
20
27
3
10
18 (Tues.)
24
31
5TH MONDAY OF THE
MONTH;
No Council Mtg.
Scheduled
Weelly M vents November/December r/December 2004
22lYIonday f ;23Tuesday 24' Wed 25 Thursday 26 Friday .127 Saturday
D Transportation, D Community Affairs Parks,
5 PM CANCELLED (Day after)
City Council COW, D City Council Special Mtg, Court Thanksgiving Thanksgiving
7 PM, to be 6:30 PM Tukwila Holiday Holiday
immediately Community Center City Offices City Offices
followed by a Closed Closed
Special Meeting
Tukwila Citizen
Patrol, 7 PM
.11 p i 1 3 y 1 2 Thurr4ay .6_ 3F3�riday 4
Green/Duwamish and Central D Equity D Human
Puget Sound Watershed project: Diversity Services Breakfast with
Open House 6 PM Commission, Providers, Santa
Public Workshop 7 -9 PM, 5:15 PM 11:30 AM 9 -10:30 AM.
Renton City Hall (1055 S. For more
Grady Way). For more information call
details, contact Dennis Clark the Tukwila
206 -296 -1909 or Community
dennis.clark @metrokc.gov. Center
Take the on -line survey 206- 768 -2822.
http: /dnr.metrokc.gov /wrias/
9 /survey.htm.
Court notations are made to alert City of Tukwila employees /citizens of potential parking difficulty only.
Apartment Managers' Networking Lunch (3rd Thurs), NOON, (bring own lunch), TCC, contact Robbie Burns 206 242 -8084.
Arts Commission (1st Tues), 5 PM, TCC, contact Kimberly Matej 206- 767 -2342.
Chipper Days, sponsored by the Washington State Dept. of Agriculture, (3rd Sat), 10 AM, Foster HS Main Parking Lot. Dispose
of prunings /plant materials from the Longhorned Beetle quarantine area. Drive your truckload of materials to the parking lot and
we'll help unload, chip, and dispose of materials free of charge. Be sure to bring ID w /quarantine area address.
City Council Committee of Whole (COW) Meeting (2nd 4th Mon), 7 PM, Council Chambers.
>City Council Regular Meeting (1st 3rd Mon), 7 PM, Council Chambers.
Civil Service Commission (2nd Mon), 5 PM. Conf Rm #3, contact Bev Willison 206 433 -1844.
Community Affairs Parks Committee (2nd 4th Tues), 5 PM, Conf Rm #3.
D Community Oriented Policing Citizens Adv. Brd. (COPCAB) (2nd Wed), 6:30 PM, Conf Rm #5, Marja Murray 206 433 -7175.
➢Crime Hot Spots Task Force (3rd Wed), 10 AM, CRC, Marja Murray 206 433 -7175.
>Domestic Violence Task Force (3rd Th), Noon -1:30 PM, Conf Rm #5, Evie Boykan 206 433 -7180 or Dave Haynes 206 433 -1812.
Equity Diversity Commission (1st Th), 5:15 PM, Showalter Middle School Library, call Lucy Lauterbach 206 433 -1834.
Finance Safety Committee (1st 3rd Mon), 5:05 PM, Conf Rm #3.
Hwy 99 Action Committee, (2nd Tue), 7 PM, TCC, contact Dave Haynes 206 433 -1812.
Human Services Advisory Board (2nd Fri of odd months only), 10 AM, Human Srvcs Conf Rm, call Evie Boykan 206 433 -7180.
>Human Services Providers, 11:30 AM; 3/19, 6/18, 9/17, 12/3 (tentative). TCC, call Evie Boykan 206 433 -7180.
Library Advisory Board (2nd Tues), 7 PM. Foster Library, call Bruce Fletcher 206 767 -2343.
Parks Commission (3rd Wed), 5:30 PM, TCC Sr. Game Rm, contact Kimberly Matej 206 767 -2342.
Planning Commission /Board of Architectural Review (Public Hrg on 4th Th; Nov Dec 2nd Th), 7 PM, Council Chambers,
contact Wynetta Bivens 206- 431 -3670.
➢Sister City Committee (as needed), Conf. Rm #3, contact Lucy Lauterbach 206 433 -1834.
r Transportation Committee (2nd 41h Mon), 5 PM, 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Conf Rm #1; 11/22 ivltg.: a) Tukwila Urban Center
transportation: additional modeling, FEIS budget needs contract supplement #4; b) So. 180th St. grade separation project
completion acceptance; c) Tukwila International Blvd, Phase #1 street trees bid award; d) Tukwila International Blvd. Phase #1
mid -block crosswalks bid award.
Tukwila Government Affairs (SWKCC) (1st Tues), Noon, Chamber Offices, contact Nancy Damon 206 -575 -1633.
Tukwila Citizen Patrol (4th Mon), 7 PM, TCC, Everett Parr 206 762 9219 /Roy Steinauer 206 243 -9191, Tukcp @hotmail.com.
>Utilities Committee (1st 3rd Tues), 5 PM, 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Conf Rm #1.