The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReg 2004-09-20 Item 6A.1 - Review - Findings and Conclusions on Sound Transit's Unclassified Use Permit, Shoreline Variance and Design P COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS O 7 ,61, y' Initia ITEM NO. z i c 1%1 I Meeting Date 1 Prepared by 1 Mayor's review 1 Council review 1 a j 1 9/7/04 1 SL 1 I I e I 9/13/04 1 SL 1908 1 9/20/04 SUltJI I�7m I I 1 _.r._ ITEM INFORMATION 1 CAS NUMBER 04-126 I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 9/7/04 AGENDA ITEM TITLE Public Hearing for Sound Transit's Unclassified Use Permit, Shoreline Variance and Design Review ADOlications CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance BidAward X Public Hearing X Other Mtg Date At Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 9/13/04 otr/na SPONSOR Council Mayor Adm Svcs X DCD Finance Fire Legal P &R Police PW SPONSOR'S Sound Transit has filed three land use applications for construction of the Tukwila SUMMARY Freeway Route Project, the Tukwila portion of the Central Link Light Rail. These applications require City Council action at a public hearing. REVIEWED BY COW Mtg. CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm DATE: RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Approval with conditions COMMIT ILE Quasi- judicial action, no committee review ICOST IMPACT FUND SOURCES EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $N /A $N /A $N /A Fund Source: Comments: Sound Transit will pay Tukwila's standard permit application and plan review fees. 1 MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 9/7/04 Public hearing held; public testimony received; deliberation to 9/13/04 Special Mtg. 9/13/04 Council deliberated and directed staff to develop 4 additional approval conditions 9/20/04 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 9/7/04 Please bring staff report binders distributed 8/20/04 9/1/04 Memo to Council Additional public comment and response to be inserted into binders 9/13/04 No attachments 9/20/04 Draft Notice of Decision Plant list, legend and details for proposed revegetation areas City of Tukwila StevenM. Mullet~Mayor Depai-ii, ent of Communtty Development Steve Lancaster, Director September 21, 2004 NOTICE OF DECISION TO: Rod Kempkes, Applicant for Sound Transit King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology Agencies with Jurisdiction Parties of Record This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Numbers: L03-057 Unclassified Use Permit L03-058 Shoreline Height Variance L03-060 Design Review Applicant: Sound Transit Central Link Light Rail Associated Files: L03-049 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit L03-059 Special Permission - Parking Determination Comprehensive Plan Designation/Zoning The trackway will pass through LI, MIC/H, MIC/L, LDR, C/LI, O, RCM, MDR, District: and RC zoning. The South 154th Street Station and the north park-and-ride lot are zoned RC. Project Description Sound Transit has filed land use applications for construction of the Tukwila Freeway Route Project (TFR Project), the Tukwila portion of the Central Link Light Rail Project (see attached map). The TFR Project will include 4.9 miles of trackway, 87% of which will be elevated, and 70% of which will be in Washington State Department of Transportation right-of-way. A station is proposed at the southeast comer of the intersection of Southeenter Boulevard and International Boulevard with a transit center, two park and ride lots (north and south of Southcenter Boulevard), and street frontage improvements in both Tukwila and SeaTac. Along the trackway five detention ponds, three traction power substations, street improvements and a bridge over the Duwamish River directly west of the East Marginal Way South bridge will be built. The TFR Project includes placing certain project facilities, such as the transit trackway columns, in Tukwila right-of-way (portions of East Marginal Way S., 52nd Ave. S. and Southcenter Blvd.). To mitigate the impacts of introducing these facilities into City right-of-way, the Sound Transit proposal includes a number of safety features (curbs, sidewalks, lighting) as well as utility undergrounding and 1 Notice of Decision by the Tukwila City Council 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 · Tukwila, Washington 98188 · Phone: 206-431-3670 · Fax: 206-431-3665 stormwater control along these roadways. A new signalized street intersection will be built where thc two park-and-ride lot driveways intersect across Sonthcenter Blvd. (approximately 420 feet east of International Blvd). Additional Findings In addition to the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan goals, objectives and policies recited in the Staff report, the following goals and policies are also relevant to this Unclassified Use Permit proposal: Residential Neighborhoods Goals and Policies Goal 7.2 Noise Abatement - Residential neighborhoods protected from undue noise impacts, in order to ensure for all residents the continued use, enjoyment and value of their homes, public facilities and recreation, and the outdoors. Prevent community and environmental degradation by limiting noise levels. Discourage noise levels which are incompatible with current or planned land uses, and discourage the introduction of new land uses into areas where existing noise levels are incompatible with such land uses. Discourage noise levels incompatible with residential neighborhoods. The "Final Design Noise Analysis" (Staff Report Attachment Gl5) prepared by Michael Minor and Associates (July 2004) and submitted by Sound Transit provides projected future noise and vibration levels using 90 percent design drawings. The impact analysis and proposed mitigation included in this analysis relate to existing development, and indicates, "New development and redevelopment along the alignment are not mitigated by the project" (page 1). The "Final Design Noise Analysis" proposes lwo alternative means of mitigating identified noise impacts: noise barriers and residential sound insulation. Testimony provided by Sound Transit at the public hearing indicated their assessment of costs and benefits was a significant factor in determining which alternative mitigation strategy to propose. The "Final Design Noise Analysis" identifies 25 buildings that will be impacted by light rail noise. Proposed mitigation for 16 of these is through construction of noise barriers. Proposed tnitigation for the remaining 9 structures is through a "residential sound insulation program" (RSIP). Two of these 9 residential structures lie within areas zoned for heavy industrial use, while the remaining 7 lie within areas zoned for low-density residential use. The "Final Design Noise Analysis" refers to these 7 structures as receivers RS, R9A, R9B, R10, R11, R12 and R13. The proposed residential noise insulation program will not mitigate light rail noise impacts received in affected residential yards, nor will it mitigate impacts upon planned residential development. The Final Design Noise Analysis documents that in addition to the noise impacts the TFR project will create vibration impacts on 4 residential properties. The predicted noise and vibration levels at the specified receivers are based on field measurements of similar light rail vehicles in use in the Portland Tri-Met system. However local soil conditions as well as maintenance practices can affect the actual noise and vibration levels of the TFR project in operation. A monitoring program would provide 2 Notice of Decision by the Tukwila City Council assurance that Sound Transit's obligation to mitigate noise and vibration impacts on Tukwila residents has been met. Monitoring over a 3-year period would document conditions through the first rail maintenance cycle. Unless they are properly screened detention ponds can have a significant negative visual impact on their surrounding areas. This is of most concern in residential areas where lots and buildings tend to be smaller and there are higher expectations ofvisua! quality than in industrial areas. Staff report Attachment G. 12 shows the locations of the 5 detention ponds Sound Transit has proposed in Tukwila. · Ponds 1 and 2 are located in industrial zones and set back from public streets. · Pond 3 between Macadam Road and 1-5, north of 144th, is zoned LDR and is set back 25 feet from the edge of pavement on Macadam. A combination of existing trees and new understory shrubs is planned for screening. Sound Transit has proposed 1 gallon size trees at 15' spacing and 1 gallon shrubs at 5' spacing. While the visual impact of the detention pond will be immediate, it will take several years for that size plantings at that spacing to provide significant screening. Larger trees and shrubs would provide quicker, more complete screening from the road and nearby residences. · Pond 4 at 146th Street and I-5 is zoned Office, is 80 feet from the nearest residence and surrounded by a wetland on two sides. · Pond 5 at 151st Street and 52nd Avenue is zoned Office and is set back 45 feet from the 151st Street R-O~W. No existing trees will be retained in this setback area, instead Douglas fir and Western Hemlocks with associated understory plantings are proposed for screening. The pond will have some visibility from the streets and the second story of the residence directly to the south until these plantings grow significantly. Larger trees and shrubs would provide quicker, more complete screening at this location as well. Sound Transit is in the process of developing a system-wide Systems Security Plan (SSP) through a Security Task Force that includes representatives from the Tukwila Police Department. The final SSP will require the concurrence of the Tukwila Police Chief. Initial procedures and staffing levels will be based on a Threat and Vulnerability Study. Day to day security on the Link Light Rail line and at the 154a' Street Station will be provided by a private company under contract to Sound Transit. Sound Transit will also contract with Metro to provide Police services so that Metro should provide the first response to calls for service at the Station. Long term security of the light rail system will require periodic evaluation &security levels by all parties and adjustment of the SSP to address changing conditions. H. DECISION SEPA Determination The Sound Transit SEPA responsible official has previously determined that the project creates a probable significant environmental impact and required preparation of an Environmantal Impact Statement. Sound Transit has submitted copies of thc Central Link Light Rail Transit Project Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), the Tnkwila Freeway Route Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) and Addendum, and the Initial Segment Environmental Assessment (hereafter called "Environmental Documents"). The City's SEPA responsible official has determined that the Environmental Documents are fully adequate and in compliance with SEPA and that, in accordance with WAC 197-11-600, they may be used unchanged for the City's decisions on the Unclassified Use Permit, Shoreline Variance, Design Review, and all other permits and approvals required by the City for Sound Transit's Link Light Rail TFR Project, as proposed by Sound Transit. 3 Notice of Decision by the Tukwila City Council Decision on Substantive Permits The City Council has determined, following an open record hearing, that the applications for an Unclassified Use Permit, Shoreline Height Variance and Design Review approval comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved those applications and proposed code modifications, subject to the following conditions, based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report (and expressly incorporated by reference into this notice) and this Notice of Decision. Specific Zoning Code modifications approved pursuant to TMC 18.66.030: 1. The TFR Project shall not be subject to Zoning Code setbacks or height limitations. These regulations were drafted to regulate typical commercial and residential development and were not intended to apply to transportation improvements such as light rail or freeways. 2. Parcels which cannot comply with Zoning Code landscape standards due to the TFR Project vegetation clear zone requirements shall not be considered non-conforming to landscape standards. 3. Perimeter landscape requirements at the station and north parking lot sites may be modified in order to maximize the efficiency of the sites as long as the total required square footage of landscaping is provided. L03-057 Unclassified Use Permit Conditions: 1. Within four months of groundbreaking at the South 154th Street Station site, Sound Transit shall construct either a temporary or permanent noise wall along the eastern edge of the lot. 2. If Sound Transit chooses to use the north parking lot as a temporary construction staging area, Sound Transit shall construct a temporary noise wall along the northern and eastern edges of the lot as approved by the City. 3. Prior to issuance of the building permit for the South 154th Street Station or north parking lot, Sound Transit shall demonstrate that the lighting plan will meet Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) guidelines as approved by the City. 4. Sound Transit has proposed to retain areas of existing landscaping to provide screening of detention ponds and buffering of residences as shown on Attachment C. In the event that these existing trees and plants do not survive the construction of the TFR project, Sound Transit shall replace them according to the schedule at TMC 18.54.130(3) prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for the South 154th Street Station. 5. The size of the landscape screening materials that Sound Transit has proposed to plant along the west and north sides of detention pond 3 and between detention pond 5 and 15 1st Avenue South shall be increased. At least half of the shrubs shall be increased from 1 to 3 gallon containers and at least half of the trees shall be increased from 1 to 5 gallon containers. 6. Sound Transit shall design and construct noise walls on the elevated trackway to mitigate light rail noise impacts on residentially zoned property where projected noise levels exceed the FTA noise criteria as identified in the Final Design Noise Analysis dated July 2004. At receiver 8 the currently planned wall shall be extended and a continuous noise wall shall be constructed between receivers 9 A, 9 B, 10, 11, 12, and 13 as identified in Appendix E of the noise report. 4 Notice of Decision by the Tukwila City Council 7. Sound Transit shall develop a 3-year noise and vibration monitoring program for the TFR Project to be approved by the City. The 3-year period shall start from the start of revenue service. Monitoring shall be conducted at representative locations where impacts and mitigation have been identified in the Final Design Noise Analysis dated July 2004. If measured levels show that noise or vibration attributable to the TFR project exceed FTA criteria as identified in the Final Design Noise Analysis Sound Transit shall provide appropriate reasonable mitigation acceptable to the City. 8. The Systems Security Plan (SSP) referenced in the August 11, 2004 concurrence letter (staff report Attachment G. 5) shall be subject to the approval of the Tukwila Police Chief and include a requirement for all parties to the Plan to periodically evaluate the security at the Station and along the trackway. Ifa security problem is found the SSP shall include a process for Sound Transit to remedy the problem with the concurrence of the Tukwila Police Chief. L03-058 Shoreline Variance Staff recommends approval of a shoreline height variance to allow an increase in height from 35 feet to 50 feet above the ordinary high water mark for the TFR bridge over the Duwamish River. L03-060 Design Review Staff recommends approval of the station building, landscape design, site layout, and furnishings as reflected in the attachments to this report. The South 154th Street Station signage is not covered by this permit and will require separate applications and approvals. Three minor modifications are anticipated to the Station site: A slight realignment of the driveway; Addition of a City Light substation at the northeast corner, and Changes to the lighting plan to meet IENSA standards. These and other minor changes should be subject to administrative approval by the appropriate Tukwila department director. The Decision on this Application is a Type 5 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code {}18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS No administrative appeal of the City Council Decision is permitted. Any party wishing to challenge the City Council Decision must file an appeal in King County Superior Court pursuant to the procadures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging an EIS may be included in such an appeal. If no appeal of the City Council decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. IV. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Nora Gierloff, who may be contacted at 206-433-7141 for further information. 5 Notice of Decision by the Tukwila City Council Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. Mayor Steven Mullet City of Tukwila Parties of Reeord Agencies with Jurisdiction Keith Neal Washington State Department of Transportation Gordon Allen Seattle City Light Greg & Vanessa Zaputil Federal Transit Administration, Region 10 Eric Schweiger Puget Sound Regional Council Michael P. Griffin US Army Corps of Engineers Chris Arkills/Dwight PelzKC Council Washington State Dept. of Fish and Wildlife F. Wayne Stollatz U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Tuong van Tran Scott Luke Pauline Tamblyn SPEEA Mark Maio Stephenie Kramer OCD Office of Archaeology Melvin Easter Johnson Braund Design Group Jennifer Mackay SPEEA John Niles CETA technical director LeAnne Bremer Miller Nash LLP Roger Lorenzen Norma Larson Craig Ward City of SeaTac Jack Lattemann King County METRO Tony Carosino Anna Bernhardt Peter Coates Hal Cooper Mary Loiselle 6 Notice of Decision by the Tukwila City Council REVEGETATKIN ZONE LEGEND STANDARD REVEGETATION SENSRIVE AREA REVEGETATION DUWAMISH REPLACEMENT TREES li p ST STANDARD TREE WETLAND BUFFER DU DUWAMISH UPLAND BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME 04,675 SF' 4 g77 UT O O UT TREE BUFFER DU 4! sr 25X 55,776 SF 25% 50% DOUGLAS RR 50% SUKA SPRUCE ACER RUBRUM/RED MAPLE 50% W. HEMLOCK 25% 50X BLACK COTTONWOOD SO% DOUGLAS FIR PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESSIV 75% 50% W. HEMLOCK 75X DOUGLAS FIR ZOX NNE MAPLE 50X PACIFIC CRABAPPLE 15% OREGON GRAPE 75% 50% SNOWBERRY ACER TRUNCATUM z ACER PLANTANOIDES 'KIETHSFORM' 15% INDIAN PLUM 20% VINE MAPLE 20% SNOWBERRY 15% OREGON GRAPE P DL DUWAMISH LOWLAND SUNSET IB 20% EVERGREEN HUCKLEBERRY 15% INDIAN PLUM DL 6 7 8 6 SF TSUGA HELEROPHUL.LA/ 10% SWORD FERN 20% SNOWBERRY WESTERN HEMLOCK 20% EVERGREEN HUCKLEBERRY 50% RED -OSIER DOGWOOD 13 SS STANDARD SHRUB 10% SWORD FERN 50% HOOKER'S WILLOW d i e 64,688 SF ,1 T� ,US -A UPLAND SHRUB BUFFER -A 2OX SALAL US--A L 64.051 SF 15X OREGON GRAPE &Yr 15% INDIAN PLUM 20% SALAL 20% SNOWBERRY 15% OREGON GRAPE 20X EVERGREEN HUCKLEBERRY 15% INDIAN PLUM �-y 10% SWORD FERN 20X SNOWBERRY f SH STANDARD I*DROSETD 10% SWORD FERN UCKIFB£RRY k �'J j US —B El;) 68.632 USLAND SHRUB BUFFER -B 50X SALAL 50% LOW OREGON GRAPE WS WETLAND SHRUB WS 16.355 SF 20% RED -OSIER .,w.,,..,3 20% NINEBARK 20% PEAFRUIT ROSE 20% SALMONBERRY 20% SrTKA WILLOW RIPARIAN(STREAM) BUFFER RT RIPARIAN TREE RT 9.915 SF 255 25% BLACK COTTONWOOD 25% PACIFIC WILLOW 50X WESTERN REDCEDAR 75% 505 SALMONDERRY 50X DMA WILLOW v v RS-A RIPARIAN SHRUB -A RS —A vv v 33.781 Sr v 20% RED -OSIER DOGWOOD 20% NINEBARK 20% PEAFRUIT ROSE 20% SALMONBERRY 205 DMA WILLOW RS -8 RIPARIAN SHRUB -8 RS —B 15.906 SF 50X SALMONBERRY 50% PEAFRUIT ROSE 5 1Defipnee BY Scel, 11 1111111.— I K. KIEST .`P� KAREN KIEST/LAND^I ARCHITECTS AS NOTED LINK LIGHT RAIL PR prow BY Hatc Matt I IDI c PIKE ST WA 90122 r� noncom SOUTH CORRIDOR M.KOSK I HARJA nn MacDonald 555�57�D62.dwg rheek.e HY y y ,9 PH 200.32.3.6032 /FAX 206.324.6930 CenVact No.: I 1 t 0 K. K 1 EST f. I`' ,,.A{ SOUND TRANSIT C 755 S I TE RESTORATION 11Appre 6Y ICI I 0 I 5abmIltee: Dote: IA/proved: E Date: Oat: 7 PLANT LIST k NT1Tre off* SF TOTALS PLANT LIST TOTALS op TtEVEGETATION spkiDARD QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE SPACING TREE 1.17 UPLAND TREE BUFFER 01,05 TOTAL 55,775 DU DIAIIAMISH -UPPER 963 DOUGLAS FIR PSELOOTSUCA LENZIESI I GAL 5' MIN. 963 W. HEMLOCK TSUGA HETEROPHYLLA GAL �j96 UT1 1.511 DU 4.977 60 BLACK COTTONWOOD POPULUS BALSAM. SSP. TRICH. GAL 5' 5' 51111. MIN. ;:831 1.1T2 6,094 DL OUWAP941 -LOWER 30 PACIFIC WILLOW SALIX LUCIDA GAL 06 UT 3, 59 WESTERN REDCEDAR THWA PLICATA GAL 5' 111N 13,62'1 UT4 2,120 20 0L MIENS 6.786 30 51TKA SPRUCE PICEA SIENSIS GAL 90 PACIFIC CRABAPPLE MALUS'FUSCA GAL. 5' 91N. ;R7 UT6 9,175 010 UT8 7,356 1155 VINE MAPLE ACER CIRCINATIN GAL 5 40 1119 6.927 1793 OREGON GRAPE MAHON14 AQUIFOLIUM GAL. 5' Uf10 5.470 LU 1793 INDIAN PM OF]LLERIA CERASI FORM IS GAL 5' P3, UT11 1,068 2481 SNOWBERRY SYMPIORI ALBS GAL 5' pu1O 11112 9,478 2391 V. HUCKLEBERRY VACCINW DATUM GAL 5' .v07 4198 SWORD FERN POLYST I CHUM MIIM I TUN CAL 5' 439 US-A UPLAND SHRUB -A 2888 SALAL GALLTNER1A SHALLON GAL 5 :,tom TOTAL 54,051 1652 LOW OREGON CRAPE MAFIONIA NERVOSA GAL 644 RED -OSIER DOGWOOD CORNS SER. SST SER10EA GAL.. 5 6392 US-A1 2.228 481 HIIEBARK PHYSOCARPUS CAPITATUS GAL 5 GAL 5' 91 US-A2 505 1042 SALMONBERR ROSE Y SALM P ONBERRY A GAL. 5' 31 5,015 ,688 US-A4 2.543 660 S1TKA WILLOW SALIX SIT0401SIS GAL 5' US-A5 44,972 163 HOOKER'S WILLOW SALTX HOOKER IANA LIVE STAKE. 5' Tile 3341 US-A7. 569 3' D I A., 4' LONG 693 REPLACEMENT TREES 1,198 US-B UPLAND SHRUB -B 2 28 160 TOTAL 68.832 0TY BOTANI0A& C0MMN FAME SIZE 73 3,151 US-81 12.563 2.781 US -82 4.745 41 ACER RUBRUM/RED MAPLE 2.5" CAL US-B3 13.256 STANDARD SHRUB US-84. 737 18181 8 8 US- 37 452 1 PSEUDOTSUGA MELRWESS9/ 3' CAL. 1, DOUGLAS FIR 5,121 Uhl UPLAND HYDROS® 10 ACER TRUNCATUM x ACER PLAI4TANOIDES 'KIETHSFORM' 3' CAL 11154 TOTAL 47,905 NORWEGIAN SUNSET MAPLE 18,442 1.774 UH1 28.068 7 MCA HETEROPIp1LLA,/ 3' CAL. 1.506 UH2 4.716 WESTEFTN HEMLOCK 791 1.945 3,831 1,459 044. 737 3,401 U45. 452 1 10,743 UH6 10,101 MORE WS WEND SHRUB WS1 2,503 WS2. 312 WS3 5,105 WS4. 842 WSS 1,310 WSS. 385 WS7 2.895 ITT RIPARIAN TREE 9,915 RT1. 775 RT2 9,137 RS -A RIPARIAN SHRUB -A 33.781 RS-A1 8.554 RS -A2 10.361 RS-/3 3,978 RS -44. 965 RS -A5 9,923 RS -B RIPARAN SHRUB -B TOTAL 15,908 RS -B1 2,117 RS -82 7.940 RS-83 5,851 1 1 Descre0 Ix SHAW ,1 MIT RAIL ir 1 K. KIEST ,�F� KAREN AIGMITECTS AS No TEO L INK L I GH 1 RA I Hatch SOUTH CORK 1 I �aa"" 0Y• 1101 E. PM ST./SFJ,T71E, 1G 06122 I 1 M.KfKKI -HARJA MacDonald �„I 1 1 1 prdrcd Bp J PH 266.323.0032 /FAX 206.3:4.0030 CanVxl Ns.: I 1 1 K. K IE5T( ,ik SOUlYATR/i11IQT c 755 SITE RESTK>i2AT I 7 IAov 8,,, swmnam �Dat. IAPprewc �Dola I001c PLAN7 L NG DETA I I 2/19/04 4, PLANE ISHRte) LOC ATION TYPICAL p THAN AVERAGE SCATTER PLANTS 50 PLANTING WITHIN v' IFIED I0IMS 1 E R SCAT PLANTING GRID E7(IST I NG VEGETATION FOk TYPE AND DEPTIL) Hl-.:: �l! {`i��f7�. S�ARIFIm SI,BIiYGDE TYPICAL CM (ON CENTER) PLANTING GRID PLANTING AREA WEED EDGE OF BED a s AtiaNS i %E NOTED ON P •i' a�e 9 ED 9 9 PLANTING AREA INaIAES IV GROUP SHRUBS Y SPACING ENTIRE GROUND SRFACE SF]CFIDN ;S..% T SEE SPECIFICATIONS SURFACE TREE. T. COVER BETWEEN PLANT$, 7.1) SEE SP£CIF IPI EN IONS Na�6 LOCATE SHRU PLANTS SPACED EQUAL Q ISTANCE u v 1ST I VEGETATION AS SHOWN. ON WI. D 42 NOTED P V ®-•-f9 SEE SETBACK CHART -347 2 N NA MDT 1• r lK 1", D AS D AS NOTED ON PLAN. L 0 «SS 1 ._i APPLY MIN. I' LAYER OF SHREDDED 1' r� N6I155160 7ROLIg N D) BA NIRCN IN It. y UNTANGLE MATTED ROOTS BY +PLANT SPACING 3 LOOSENING N.I. ROOTS AT EDGE OF 5 �_SARRIER. GUARDRAIL, SIDETMALK R00110 1. WITH WATER FROM NOSE. RAMDONLY Mix PLANT SPECIES OR EDGE OF SHOULDER U FERTf417ER REW FOR PLANT TYPICAL SERt1.9 PLANTING DETAIL 5905ET PLANTS TO AVOIO SIRAIGHT ROWS ING AREA GENERAL LAYOUT 8 SETBACKS 7 RESTORATION PLANTING: EOVAL SPACING LAYOUT RANDOM PLANTING PATTERN 157-1264 415 LS� 4 I.ITS 157-1064 STEP I STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 ST 6 PUCE INCORPORATE PLACE INSTALL PLACE 1 501E TO v PANT BARK t AMEND. DEEP 1' DEEP MULCH 2' DEEP 2• ---EXISTING GRADE VARIES) ti� CUT C� (IA I: ,,,I 51 gal .12119CIREllh FINISH GRADE r 4 t -,'A PLANT MATERIAL SETBACK CHART F I.WEDRAIL 19 0C 5 DOSING AIRE CATCH BA UND I51ES R ED O ACCESS D OOR, SICNLL. PCR£ E TR I vEGETATDN I BOTTOM OF I V 211059 5 OR a I Q I I G EDGf OF I NOISE WALL VTLRY BO%E SIGN POST, I TRU NK I INSIS I LUMIN I DITCH I DRUNACE `�S� H t� v ROADWAY FENCE CATE III 11 1 i 1 �i 4 v im✓ fi�'i i• i, TREE REEK T SEEE DET AIL 1 10' 15' 1 75' I 10' 20' 10' I to' 1PREPARAT ION SEQUENCE OF WORK (SECT V IEW) 4 I SHRUB 70' 5' S' B' 6' 70' S' 1 S' 157 -1554 T)�� I 10.•4640 lb, sea.: a-.a Na 1 1 K. N ZEST �P KAM KIIMIA.A IDSCAPC ARV/TEM Vil I AS NOTED 1 LINK LIGHT RAIL PROJECT 4 L ?�_'`>i�� pre. BS �'K Hatch Mott 1101 c PIKE 17137-0114 WA 00I22 FS"a"•' SOUTH CORRIDOR k. I N.KOSKI -HA RJA 0ets M acDonald n.. row: 5r. K. K rN 201.52SW31 TA R 20 632MEJO '.owm Na: Snood Ne.: T51� SOUNDTRANSIT I G 755 SITE RESTDRATIO 10005... 0 d i 5rw.m.a: r r r 1296 RA n 1 I 2/19/04 PLANTING DETAILS A GU DEWAY rfP 4' I .1 11 I JIM ri APPROXIMATE D I SPERAL PATTERN 4 7". 4 FROM ELEVATED TRACK, REFER Q. 25 I TO CIVIL DRAW I NGS FOR Cr LOCAT I ON AND DETA rfP I 'f 4 APPLY COARSE MULCH •1 W I TH I N AREA OF STORM i WATER DISPERSION I .„..=r6tagml I 1 ■1" VW 11 1 11 1 I__I L ,I t-_.--,-- VEGETATION CLEAR ZONE (7\ PLANTING MULCH AT L ID DISPERSAL AREA SCALE ir= I '-0 L57- LD66 SCALE: )r= I 1 0" L57-L056