Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2004-07-26 Item 3C - Ordinance - Traffic Concurrency Standards Amendment COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS J,�`Y'11m, i,1. r s 0 1 _!nide& ITEM NO. �1,,, z G) Meeting Date Prepared by May view 1 Council review 1 4 p 1 7/26/04 1 CK `J to /,t f/ 1 ,Nk 1 1 Lj 1 1 1 C rsos 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ITEM INFORMATION CAS NUMBER: 04-106 'ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: JULY 26, 2004 AGENDA ITEM TITLE Adopt Ordinance amending Traffic Concurrency Standards as codified at TMC 9.48.160 Credit to Developer CATEGORY Discussion Motion Resolution Ordinance Bid Award Public Hearing Other Mtg Date 7/26/04 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date SPONSOR Council Ma Adm Svcs DCD Finance Fire Legal Pd9'B Police SPONSOR'S Recent legal challenges to the City's Concurrency Ordinance, specifically to the impact SUMMARY mitigation fee methodology, created a need for Tukwila to modify the Concurrency Ordinance (TMC 9.48) and update the Mitigation Fee list. The modifications and updates were approved in May 2004. A need for a clarification to the language granting credit to developers has come forth amending TMC 9.48.160 Credit to Developer. REVIEWED BY COW Mt CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte Utilities Cmte Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: July 26, 2004 RECOMMENDATIONS: Amend the Traffic Concurrency Standards (TMC 9.48.160) SPONSOR /ADMIN. Recommendto COW for discussion COMMITTEE ICOST IMPACT FUND SOURCE' EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED Fund Source: Comments: MTG. RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 11/24/03 5/03/04 Adopted Ordinance #2043 1 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 7/26/04 Information Memo Ordinance 6tuk2 \volt \pubworks \cyndy \concurrency impact fees \cas transp concurrency impact fees 7- 26- 04.doc INFORMATION MEMO To: Mayor Mullet From: Public Works Director/~) Date: luly 21, 2004 Subject: Transportation Concurrency Ordinance Amendment ISSUE Amend the Concurrency Ordinance TMC 9.48.160 Credit to Developer. BACKGROUND Recent legal challenges to the City's Concurrency Ordinance, specifically to the impact mitigation fee methodology, created a need for Tukwila to modify the Concurrency Ordinance (TMC 9.48) and update the Mitigation Fee list. The modifications and updates were approved in May 2004. ANALYSIS A need for a clarification to the language granting credit to developers has come forth. As the language exists today, developers could be given credit for virtually any transportation-related improvements made as part of the development activity, including projects not to the benefit or desire of the City. The current language has lead to a misinterpretation of the city's intent with regards to what should qualify as a credit. Staff is proposing revising the language to reflect that of the state law (RCW 82.02.060). Credit to the developer, with this proposed change, could be granted for land dedication and improvement or construction toward system improvements that are both part of the City's Capital Facilities Element and are required by the City as a condition of approval. RECOMMENDATION Review the proposed ordinance change and refer to full Council for adoption. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE Na 2043, AS CODIFIED AT TMC 9.48.160, "CREDIT TO DEVELOPER," REGARDING TUKWILA'S TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY STANDARDS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila seeks to ensure that State-mandated standards for e,H' concurrency in existing facilities and new development are met and f. WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila seeks to ensure that new development is fairly assessed a proportionate cost of new infrastructure required to serve the new development NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 4 Section 1. Ordinance Amended. Ordinance 2043, as codified at TMC Chapter 9.48.160 "Credit to Developer," is hereby amended to read as follows: by 9.48.160 Credit to Developer A develn caa:itled a c is ass. :flo'ca Taalsportation ImpactFee IIa ma uediCa::vaa va land its, aua w w start wamSUCuvu a,a any Transportation System fupa nca.ca.c provided by the developer- tv- the-ci a, as cundiliun of ayytuvel of the Development Activity. A davelnrar it entitled to a rrnel if against a Transportation Impact Foe fnr the value of land dedicated fer 'niprnvement tn, or 1101 ronatrur+inn of axe, el,cf improvements prnvided by the develnpo to facilities that are identified in the capital. facilities element and that are required by this City ac rnnditinn of apprnlnng g 1 development activity it> Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2004. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk i :s.• Filed with the City Clerk. APPROVED AS TO FORM BY Passed by the City Council: Published. Effective Date. Office of the City Attorney Ordinance Number. 7rafboconeunency 7 /204 1 of 1