HomeMy WebLinkAboutReg 2003-12-01 Item 4G - Turnover - Public Infrastructure from Olive Garden ($37,048.58 Value)CAS Number:
03-155
Agenda Item Title:
Original Sponsor:
Timeline:
Sponsor's Summary:
Recommendations:
Sponsor:
Committee:
Administration:
Cost Impact (if known):
Fund Source (if known):
Meeting Date
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Initials
Meeting Date Prepared by 1 Mayor's review I Council review
12/01/03 .2
1VI.INFO
15 5 I Original Agenda Date:
Accept Turnover of Storm Drainage System (Olive
Council
N/A
(4
Admin.
The Olive Garden Restaurant is complete and ready for turnover of public infrastructure
improvements. Public Works staff inspected and accepted the facilities. Development
included 449 linear feet of 12" Hancore Storm Pipe, 11 catch basins with lids, 2 Stormceptors,
and all appurtenances for a value of $37,048.58.
Accept turnover of public infrastructure.
Forward to Regular Agenda and authorize Mayor to sign acceptance form.
Same as sponsor.
Action
'WE "ter taNPI
December 1, 2003
Garden Restaurant)
Public Works
Meeting Date 1 Attachments
12/01/03 I Information memo dated November 18, 2003 with vicinity maps
1 Transportation Committee meeting minutes from November 24, 2003
(Turnover documents available at Public Works
ITEMNO.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ISSUE
Accept Deed of Conveyance of Public Improvements. Deed is required for final acceptance of
Building Permit by the Public Works Department.
BACKGROUND
INFORMATION MEMO
Mayor Mullet
Public Works Director_( 1`v'
November 18, 2003 (J"
Olive Garden Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Deed of Conveyance of Public Improvements
Permit Nos. D02-317/ L02 -020
Site Location 310 Strander Blvd., Tukwila
Parcel No. Portion of 262304 -9004
Owner has applied for necessary permits to develop certain real property. As a condition of the
Olive Garden development, 449 lineal feet of 12 -inch Hancore storm pipe, 8 each Type I catch
basins, 3 each Type II 48 -inch catch basins, 1 each solid lid for existing catch basin, 1 each
Stormceptor 900, 1 each Stormceptor 450i, and all appurtenances shall be transferred from the
Olive Garden to the City. The value of the transferred assets, from the Developer to the City of
Tukwila, is $37,048.58.
Conditions were placed on the development to provide the following tumover documents:
1. Deed of Conveyance of Public Improvements
2. List of Materials /Costs (City format)
The storm drainage facilities are new, are per City standards, and shall be public upon transfer
from Developer to the City of Tukwila.
RECOMMENDATION
Authorize Mayor to sign acceptance forms.
attachments: vicinity map
Development file: Olive Garden Development
na neon
NOTE: All documents are available at Public Works and will be presented at the meetings.
Olive Garden
Infrastructure Turnover D02-317
Olive Garden Infrastructure Turnover D03-317
Map
Transportation Committee
November 24, 2004
DRAFT
Present: Richard Simpson, Chair; Dave Fenton, Pam Linder
Frank Iriarte, Brian Shelton, Robin Tischmak, Cyndy Knighton, Lucy
1. 2003 Overlay Completion and Acceptance Robin passed out a map showing
where the six overlay projects were done this year. Projects were done on 42nd Ave S.,
S. 153` Baker Boulevard, 40 Ave S., TIB and 51 Ave. S. Lakeside Industries was the
contractor, and all work has been done. There was $36,105 in under runs due to
quantity under runs. Traffic control and street planning were overruns, but there were
no weather delays or bad soils. Recommend contract acceptance and release of
retainaae to Regular Meeting.
2. KFC /Taco Bell Turnover KFC is moving to the old Burger King site on TIB. As
part of their development, they are dedicating public right of way off of TIB. This will
make things easier for the city right of way projects. Recommend acceptance of
turnover documents to Reaular Meeting.
3. Olive Garden Turnover of Improvements As a condition of the Olive Garden's
development they built to city specifications and are now ready to turn over some
utilities. These include storm pipes, catch basins and their lids, and stormceptors. Their
value is $37,048.58. Recommend acceptance of utilities to Reaular Meeting.
4. Transportation Concurrencv and Impact Mitigation Staff explained that the
rush on this is self- imposed both because of the current lawsuit appeal and because of
some impending developments it would be good to have it ready for. The information
presented tonight is a first draft of what needs to be done. It is more of a quick fix than
a very thorough assessment of the whole concurrency and mitigation system. A more
complete review and ordinance will be done next year. Cyndy said the department is
interested in plugging vulnerabilities with this interim plan.
Cyndy passed out a table of mitigation expected for specific sections of streets in the
CBD. Some were projects that have already been done, and others were projects that
are beyond six years. She then passed out language that would be in the ordinance
but it was written in an easy to read format, which showed current and newly proposed
language. As she went through the memo and explained some of the changes. Pam
suggested she write a memo to guide people through the changes and the tables, and
explain some anomalies. The committee suggested she explain Level of Service as well
as the difference between concurrency and impact mitigation. She said concurrency is a
yes /no issue of whether facilities are adequate now or in the future to handle the new
growth. If the answer is "no developers must pay traffic impact fees. They must also
do a traffic study to determine how many trips their business is expected to add to the