HomeMy WebLinkAboutReg 2003-08-04 Item 5B - Resolution - Ratify Amendments to 2003 Countywide Planning PolicyCAS NUMBER: 03-099
~ ......................... Initials ........................ ITEM NO.
i~MeetingDatePreparedbyMay°r'sreviewC°uncilreview',......, ...., ,, 08-04-0307-28-03
Agenda Item Title: Proposed Resolution Ratifying the 2003 Countwide Planning Policy Amendments
Original Sponsor: Council Adrnin. X
Timeline: Action requested by 08-'17-03
Sponsor's Summary: King County adopted seven amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies for
King County on May 19, 2003. Tukwila's City Council may act to ratify or oppose the
amendments within 90 days of the County's action (by 08-17-03). In the event the
City Council takes no action by that date, the City will be deemed to have ratified the
amendments.
Recommendations:
Sponsor: Ratify the proposed Countywide Planning Policy amendments - Approve Resolution
Committee: Ratify the proposed Countywide Planning Policy amendments - Approve resolution.
Administration: Same as sponsor.
Cost Impact (if known): None
Fund Source (if known): N/A
Meeting Date Action
07-28-03 Council reviewed proposed resolution. Consensus existed [o forward the
item to the August 4 Regular meeting.
Meeting Date Attachments
07-28-03 Memorandum - from S. Lancaster, to City Council - dated July 23, 2003
Minutes - Community Affairs & Parks Committee - dated July 15, 2003
Proposed Resolution - Draft Format
08-04-03 Resolution - Final Format - I~cluding Attachments.
City of Tukwila
Washington
Resolution No.
' "~: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWII_~,
· ..,.~.~: WASHINGTON, RATIFYING SEVEN PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE
-.:~?::-'., COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES FOR KING COUNTY, AS
RECOMMENDED BY THE KING COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT
'~;~; PLANNING COUNCIL
WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policies for King County were adopted and
raffled through an inter-jurisdictional planning process in 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Planning Council for King County has
recommended seven proposed amendments to the Countywide Planning Policies; and
WHEREAS, on May 19, 2003 the King County Council approved and ratified the
proposed amendments on behalf of unincorporated King County through adoption of
Ordinance 14652, Ordinance 14653, Ordinance 14654, Ordinance 14655 and Ordinance
14656; and
WHEREAS, an existing interlocal agreement provides that amendments to the
Countywide Planning Policies become effective only if ratified by at least thirty percent
of local jurisdictions within King County representing at least seventy percent of the
county's population; and
WHEREAS, the proposed amendments have been reviewed by the Tukwila City
Council and found to be beneficial to continued regional cooperation and coordination
in managing growth;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
:"-'~ ~; Section 1. Ratification of GMPC Motion 02-04. The City of Tukwfla hereby ratifies
Growth Management Planning Council Molfion 02-04, attached hereto as Exhibit A,
amending the Countywide Planning Policies to support ongoing water supply planning
and development
' Section 2. Rallficafion of GMPC Motion 02-01. The City of Tukwfla hereby ratifies
Growth Management Planning Council Motion 02-01, attached hereto as Exhibit B,
amending the Countywide Planning Policies concerning the allocation and
"~ implementation of housing and employment targets for jurisdictions within King
County.
Section 3. Ratification of GMPC Motion 02-02. Tho City of Tukwila hereby ra~dfies
Growth Management Planning Council Motion 02-02, attached hereto as Exhibit C,
amending the Countywide Planning Poli by estabiishing new housing targets for
jurisdictions in King County for the 2012 to 2022 period.
Section 4. Ratification of GMPC Motion 02-0~. The City of Tukwfla hereby ratifies
Growth Management Planning Council Motion 02-05~ attached hereto as Exhibit D,
" amending the Countywide Planning Policies by establishing new employment targets
'' ~;'. for jurisdictions in King County for the 2012 to 2022 period.
, : Section 5. Ratification of GMPC Motion 02-05. The City of Tukwila hereby rat/ties
Growth Management Planning Council Motion 02-05, attached hereto as Exhibit E,
amending the Countywide Planning Policies' "Urban Separator Map" to reflect a
~ modification to the urban separator in the vicinity of the City of Renton.
' Section 6. Ratification of GMPC Motion 02-06. The City of Tukwila hereby rat/ties
~ Growth Management Planning Council Motion 02-06, attached hereto as Exhibit F,
. amending the Countywide Planning Policies by designating the Totem Lake planning
~': City
· -. area wiffdn the of Kirkland as an Urban Center.
Section 7. Ratification of GMPC Motion 01-2. The City of Tukwila hereby ratifies
Growth Management Planning Council Motion 01-2, attached hereto as l~xhibit G,
amending the Countywide Platming Polities to add new policies addressing the long-
Protection Districts.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON,
at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of ,2003.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED:
Pam Carter, Council President
Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk
. APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Filed with the City Clerk
Passed by the City Council:
Office of the City Attorney Resolut/on Number:
EXHIBIT A
September 25, 2002
Sponsored By: Executive Committee
1 MOTION NO. 02-4
2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King
3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning
4 Policies adding a new policy to support ongoing water supply
5 planning and development.
7 WHEREAS, in luly 2002, the Growth Management Planning Council approved additions
8 and changes to the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies approving the countywide process
9 developed to recommend a new 22-year household and employment target; and
10
11 ~AS, an amendment to add a new policy supporting ongoing water supply planning
12 and dgvelopmant was considered and tabled; and
13
14 v~r~-iERt~AS, the (}MPC allowed reconsideration of the amendment at such time agreement
15 could b~ reached on the language; and
16
17 WI-]~I~AS, it is in the interest of the county to encourage regional 'efforts to plan for and
18 develop sufficient water supply sources to accommodate population growth and to meet
19 environmental needs related to conservation of fish habitat.
20
21 THE GROW~rH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIl. OF KING COUNTY .
22 H~cEBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
24 Add a new policy to Section IH C of the Kin, g County Countywi.de Planning Policies as
25 follows:
26 FW-12c 'Ensuring sufficient water supply is essential to accommodate growth and
27 conserve fish habitat. Due to the substantial'lead-lime required to develop water su~olv.
28 . sources, infrastwcmre and mnnaEement strategies, long-term water supply vlannin~ efforts
29 in the Region must be ongoing.
3o
32
33
!
:2 ADOPTED by the GrOwth .Management Planning Council of King County on
3 September 25, 2002 in open session.
4
5
?
8
10 Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
EXIHRIT B
July 24, 2002
· Sponsored By: Executive Committee
/cm
I MOTION NO. 02-1
2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Plamfing Council of King
3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide Planning
4 Policies revising existing policies and adding new policies to support
5 the extension of the household and employment targets for the period
6 2001-2022.
7
8 ~S, in accordance with the Growth Management Act (GMA), the 1994
9 Countywide Planning Policies established a household and employmeht target range for
10 each city and for King County through 2012; and
11
12 ~, the 1994 targets need to be extended to reflect projected growth through 2022
13 in accordance with the GMA'(RCW 36 70A 110); and
14
15 WHEREAS, Countywide Planning Policy FW~3 states that the adop(ed household and
16 employment targets shall be monitored by King County annually with adjustments made
17 by the Growth Management Planning Council utilizing the process established in FW-1,
15 Step 6; and ..
19
20 WHEREAS since February 2001 staff from King County and the cities in King County
21 'have work~ cooperatively to analyze and recommend new 20-year household and
22 employment targets; and
23
24 WHEREAS the Growth Management Planni.ng Council met and discussed the extension of
Z5 the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022, with opportunity for
26 public comment o.n March 28, 2001, Suly 2. 5, 2001, October 24, 2001 and May 22, 2002.
27 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING coUNcIL OF KING COUNTY
.2S ttERrmY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
30 Amend Sections IH. C and III. F of the King County Countywide Planning Policies'ns
31 follows;.
33 m. Land Use Pattern
34
35 O, Urban Areas
36
I The following policies establish an Urban Growth Area (UGA), determine the amount of
2 household and emplc~ment growth to be accommodated within the UGA in the form of
3 targets for each jurisdiction, and identify methods to phase development within this area in
4 order to bring certainty to long-term planning and development within the County. Al__[
$ cities are included in the UGA, with the'cities in the Rural Area identil~ed as islands of
6 urban growth. The ( .................. ) UGA is a permanent designation, l. xmd outside
7 the (Lrr~c.~. Grc:'.':h A, ca) UGA is designated for permanent rural and resource ases.((v
8 .~r. J .............................. )) Countywide Policies on Rural and Resource Areas
9 are found in Chapter HIA, Resource Lands, and Chapter II1B, Rural Areas.
10
11 In accordmice with the State Growth Management Act (GMA) ($6.70A.110) the State
12 Or, ce of Financial Management (OFM) provides a t~opulation projection to each county.
13 Thc count% through a collaborative intergovernmental process established by the Growth
14 Management Planninz Council. allocates the vot~ulation as erowth tareets to individual
15 jurisdictions. ForecaSts pret~ared by the Puget Sound Regional Council are used to
16 establish the empl°Wnent projection.
17
18 The probess for allocating targets in King Count~ is as follows:
19
20 ], The PSRC employment forecasts are calculated for the fo~r geographic subareas of
21 the UGA (Sea-Shore. South. East, and Rural Cities). These then become subarea
22 employment tareets.
23' 2. The jurisdiction~ collectively allocate the OFM t~ooulation oroiection to the four
24 subarea'~ based on the projected employment for each area. A ~rnall amount of
25 growth is assumed to occur in the Rural area.
26 3..The technical staff translates the vot~ulaEon projections.into projected households,
27 tal~g into account different average household ~i~es within each.subarea. These
28 projections then become ~barea household targets.
29 4: Jurisdictiouswithineachsubareanegotiatethedi~tributionofsubareahousehoId
30 and employment targets using criteria bused on Countv~vide PlanninJ~ Policies.
31
32 The housing capacity in the (( .................. )) [IGA ((~. o ......:)), based on adopted
· 33 plans and regulatiqn~, ((mcc.'z thc)) should accommodate the t~roiected'tO-year
34. growth(( .............. .~ ........... ., ................. o ................~.~.o
35 r~r ........~ ....... )). ((I~. ...~ ~....., ~, ---E "r~.. $))G_rowth is to be accommodated within
36' perhmnent Urban Areas by increasing de~si~es, as neede,t Phusing ((is ia)) should occur
37 within the (( .................. )) UGA, us necessat% to en.~ure that services are provided
38 as growth occurs. ((. ......... c:c tc ~c :':?:..~ '..~.c rJr~== Crc:';:.~. Arc= Ci.~.c: ".=
40 FW-1 ~ The land use pattem for King County shall protect lhe natural
4]. environment by reducing the consumption of land and Concentrating
42 development. A~ Urban Growth Area, Rural Areas, and resource lands
43 shall be designated and the necessary implementing regulations
44 adopted. This includes Countywide establishment of a boundx7 for the
45 Urban Growth Area. Local jurisdictions shall make land use decisions
.4~ based on the Countywide Planning Policies.
4?
L/G1VJ~/O2GMPCtMmO2-1.doc -- ~-- -
I FW-12 The Urban Growth Ama shall provide enough land to accommodate
2 futura urban development. Policies to phase the provision of urban
3 services and to ensure efficient use of the growth capacity within the
4 Urban Growth Ama shall be instituted.
5
6 FW-12a 'All iurisdictions within Kinq County sham the responsibility to
? accommodate the 20-year population pmiection. The qrowth pmiection
s shall be assi.qned to the four subareas of Kinq County (Sea-Shore, East,
9 South, and the Rural Cities) proportionate with the share of pmiected
10 employment .qrowth. The .qrowth shall be allOCated pumuant to the
~ 1 followin,q obiectives:
12 a. To ensure efficient use of land within the UGA by dimctin.q .qrowth to
13 Urban Centem and Activ'~ Centem;-
14 b, To limit development in the Rural Areas;
1~ c.. To protect desiRnated msoume lends;
16 d. To ensure efficient use of infrastructure;
17 e. To improve the iobs/housinq balance on a subarea basis;
15 f. To promote a land use pattern that can be served by public
19 transportation and other alternatives to the sin.qle occupancy vehicle;
20 and
2~ g. ,To provide sufficient opportunities for qrowth within the iufi~dicti0ns.
23 FW-12b The qrowth tarqets established pumuant to the meth0doloqy described in
24 LU-25c and 25d shall be supported by both mRio'nal and local
~ transportation investments. The availability of an ade(~uate
26 transportation system is.critically important to accommodatino arowth.
27 The mqional responsibility shall be met by'planninq for and dellverinq
2s county, state, and federal investments that support the arowth tamets
29 and the land use pattern of the County. This includes investments in
3o transit, state hiqhways in key m.qional transportation corridom.'and in
31 improved access to the desi.qnated Urban Centem. The local
32 '. responsibility shall be met by local transportation system investments
33 that support the achievement of the tamets.
35 LU - 25a F~.h iurisdiction shall plan for and accommodate the household and
36 employment tar.qets established pumuant to LU-25c a~d LU-25d. This
37 obliqation includes:
3s a. Ensurinq adequate zoninc~ caoacitv: and
39 b. Planninq for and deliverinq water, sewer, transportation and othe~
4o infrastructure, in concert with federal and state investments and
4~ recoil.* nizin.q where applicable special purpose districts; and
42 c. Accommodatinq increases !n.household and employment tamets as
43 annexations occur.
45 The tarqets will be used to plan for and to accommodate .qrowth within
46 each iurisdiction..The tarqets do not obli.qate a iurisdiction to quarantee
47 that a Riven number of housin.q units will be built or iobs added durina the
4s plannin.q period.
IJGMI~/ff2GMPCJMot02-I.doc - 3 -
1 LU25b As annexations occur, growth targets shall be adjusted. Household and
2 employment targets for each jurisdiction's potential annexation area. as
3 adopted in Table LU -1, shall be transferred to the annexing jurisdiction
4 follows:
5
6
7
8
9
10
11'
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 LU ((6W)) 25cThe target ((s-and-regulations)) obiectives identified in ((LU -66))
24 FW -12a ((are based -en)) shall be realized throuah the following ((steps))
25 methodoloov for allocating household targets:
26 a.
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
a. King County and the respective city will determine new household
and employment targets for areas under consideration for
annexation prior to the submittal of the annexation proposal to the
King County Boundary Review Board;
b. A city's household and employment targets shall be increased by a
share of the target for the potential annexation area proportionate to
the share of the potential annexation area's develooment capacity
located within the area annexed. Each city will determine how and
where within their corporate boundaries to accommodate the taroet
increases:
c. The County's target shall be corresoondinaly decreased to ensure
that overall target levels in the county remain the same:
d. The household and employment taraets in Table LU -1 will be
undated periodically to reflect changes due to annexations. These
target updates do not reauire adoption by the Growth Manaaement
Plannina Council_
Determine the additional
population that must be accommodated countywide by calculatincl,the
difference between the most recent Census count and the State
Office of Financial Management population projection for the end of
the twenty year olanning eriod;
b.
Subtract a percentaae from that number to represent the amount of
growth that is assumed to occur in the uninconoorated Rural Area:
LGMPC/02GMPCJMo102J doc
4
c. Assian proportions of the urban population growth to each of the four
subareas (Sea- Shore. South. East. and Rural Cities) based on the
Proportion of future employment growth forecasted for each of those
subareas by the Puget Sound Reaional Council;
d. Convert the estimated projected population for each subarea to an
estimated number of households. using proiected average
household sizes that reflect the variation among those subareas
observed in the most recent Census;
e. Allocate a household target to individual urisdictions. within each
subarea. based on FW -12a and considering the following factors:
1. the availability of water and the capacity of the sewer system:
2. the remaining portions of previously adopted household targets:
3. the presence of urban centers and activity areas within each,
iurisdiction;
4. the availability of zoned develooment capacity in each iurisdiction;
and
5: the apparent market trends for housing_ in the area.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34 A portion of the urban employment growth will occur in Activity Areas and neighborhoods
35 in the Urban Area This employment growth will support the Urban Centers, while
36 balancing local employment opportunities in the Urban Area
37
38
39 LU ((68)) 25d
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
steps)) The taroet obiectives identified in FW -12a shall be realized
through the followino methodology for allocating employment targets:
1/GMPC/02GMPC/Ma02 -1.doc
Omen))
f. Jurisdictions shall plan for household targets as adooted in Table
LU -1; and
((#))g: Monitoring should follow the process described in policy FW-
1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28.
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
residential areas)) Determine the number of lobs that must be
accommodated in each of the four subareas of King County (Sea
Shore. South, East. and the Rural Cities) in accordance with the most
recent PSRC lob estimates and forecasts for the 20 -year planning
period. To account for uncertainty in the employment forecasts.
establish a range of new lobs that must be accommodated in each
subarea. Unless exceptional circumstances dictate. the range should
be 5% on either side of the PSRC forecast.
b.
For each subarea. determine the
point within the range upon which iurisdictions within the subarea will
base their taraets and allocate employment growth taraets to
individual jurisdictions based on consideration of the following:
1. the PSRC small area forecasts:
2. the presence of urban centers. manufacturinp/industriai
centers, and activity areas within each turisdiiction:
3. the availability of zoned commercial and industrial
development capacity in each iurisdiction and;
4. the access to transit. as well as to existing hiahways and
arterials.
c. Jurisdictions shall plan for employment targets as adopted in Table
LU -1.
(INSERT TABLE LU -1)
IGMPCJ02OMPCMoIO2 -1.doc 6
1 F. 1. Urban Residential Areas
2 Urban residential areas form the bulk of the UGA, and are home to a large portion of the
3 County's population. They will contain a mix of uses and will have different
4 characteristics in different neighborhoods. Generally, the character, form, preservation
5 and development of these areas ((is -a)) are the responsibility of the local jurisdiction ((al
6 respensibility)). However, the residential areas need to support the Centers concept and
7 provide sufficient opportunity for growth within the UGA. A substantial majority of new
8 residential units will be constructed within urban residential areas.
9
10
11 LU -66 In order to ensure efficient use of the land within the UGA, provide for
12 housing opportunities, and to support efficient use of infrastructure, each
13 jurisdiction shall:
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
a. Establish in its comprehensive plan a target minimum number of net
new households the jurisdiction will accommodate in the next 20
years in accordance with the adopted household growth taroets
identified in Table LU -1. Jurisdictions shall adopt regulations to and
commit to fund infrastructure sufficient to achieve the target number,
b. Establish a minimum density (not including critical areas) for new
construction in each residential zone; and
c. Establish in the comprehensive plan a target mix of housing types for
new development and adopt regulations to achieve the target mix.
UOMPCJ02GM0(7Mot02-1.doc
7
ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on July 24,
2 2002 in open session.
3
4
5
6
7 7 Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
S
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1/GMPCO2OMPCIMotO2 -t.doc 9
'EXnmrr c
July 24, 2002
Sponsored BT. Executive Committee
/cm
1 MOTION NO. 02.-2
2 A MOTION by the Growth Management Planning Council of King
3 County recommending the amendment Of the Countywide Planning
4 Policies adding targets fbr new household for the period 2001-2022
by deleting Appendix 2, 2A and 2B and amending Table LU-I: 2001-
6 2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets which will be
7 located in Section Ill. C of the Countywide Planning Policies.
8
9 WHEREAS, the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies established a housing target range for
10 each city and for King County; and
11
12 WI-IEREAS, the Growth Management Act requires the 1994 targets need to be revised to
13 establish an extension of the targets through 2022; and
14
15 WHEREAS the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of
16 the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022, with opportunity for
17 public comment on' March 28, 2001, July 25, 2001, October 24, 2001 and May 22, 2002.
THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUN'I~
19 HERF~Y MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
21. 'I~e attached Table LUll: 2001-2022 Household and P~mployment ~rowth Targets
22 is hereby recommende~ for adoption in the Countywide Planning Policies to ~viae
23 the household growth targets to reflect the target extension from January 1, 2001
24 through December 3 I, 2022 and Appendix 2, 2A, 2B are .recommended for
deletion.
26
28
29
30
31
1
3 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
4 September 25, 2002 in open session.
5
6
8
I0 ~
I1 Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Countfi
Attachment:
13 1. 'Table LU-I: 2001-2022 Household and Employmem Growth Targets.
1
Subareas
South Kin, County
AJ
t
ww
o
e.,
t,.
sr» La!
to
i
leeatp 11
a
k
Household 1111 Capacity PAA HI!
Target in FAA* Target
1 I
298 1 1
5,92R 26351 926
1.099 I
1.552 1
1.t73 I
1.576 5 1
6.($j 3.7541 1 320
t 1 4. 2Rd� 1.763 61
in 1 'i
3011 1
996 127 1 45
6.196 I 5.622 I 1.976
4d7R 1 141 S
12 3.7001 13I 5
UninmmKinn County 4935I I
423A5 1 14.0391 4.935
Rest Rine Conan I
Bean Arts Vitt*** 31 I m
lemma 10.117 1 114.1 1A
1.751 663 1 5R4
de Hill 21 1
1_ I
193 9 R27 1 R02
2.325 1
S ill 779_1 747
31 1
1.417 I
R63 11 1
9 OR3 402 I 390
b 3.847 I
WoediniU` 1 860 i
V/ Pnint 2R 1
Unmcorn KinR County 6.801 "4222 I ••4099
47.645 7.009 I 6.861
1
a. 53R 1 1
510 I I
1 13 651 II I
Unloosen King County*** 1.670 I 1.670 1 1.670
Maple Valley
fie
tnn
Sea .Shore
Mire Citin
1/GMPC /02GMPC/Mot02 -2.doc
56.369 I 1.670 1 1.670
246
1.037
1 927
636
Job Target
Job Capacity PAA Job
in PAA Target
ids t9_
Snoaualmie 1.697
1 SAKI
Kfna Camty Total 151.931
*PAA: Potential Aaaeaadoe AminL..s...... ed King Comity Urban Alex "Bear Creek UPU, a *Mor61Hghlioe
The Rural Cities' targets are for the cuneur city Emits and rural expansion am for each city. This the methodology
for ac tudng targets as annexations occur is not applicable to the sur11 sides.
luly 24, 2002
Sponsored By: Executive Committee
/cm
I MOTION NO. 023
2 A MOTION by the Crtowth Management Planning Council of King
· 3 County recommending the amendment of the Countywide planning ·
4 Policies adding targets for new jobs for the period 2001-2022 by
5 emending Table LU- 1: 2001-2022 Household and Employment
6 Growth Targets which will be located in Section In. C of the
7 Countywide Planning Policies.
$
9 WHEREAS, the 1994 Countywide Planning Policies ~stablished an employment target
10 range for each city and [or King Coanty; arid
11
12 ~S, the 1994 targets need to be revised to establish an extension of tho t~rgets
13 through 2022 .as required by the Growth Management Act.
14
15 ~S the Growth Management Planning Council met and discussed the extension of
16 the household and employment targets for the period 2001-2022, with opportunity for
17 public comment on March 28, 2001, July 25, 2001, October 24, 2001 and May 22, 2002.
GROWTH MANAOBIVIEKI' PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
1
19 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
2o
21 The attached Table LU-I: 2001-2022 Household and F. mployment Growth Targets
22 is hereby ~e. cdmmended for adoption in the Countywide Planning Policies to revise
23' /ho employment growth targets to reflect the target extension from January I, 2001
24 through December 31, 2022..
.25
27
28
29
3o
31
32
33
34
35
36
i
- 3 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
4 September 25, 2002 in open session.
5
6
7
10
11 ·
12 -- Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
13
14 Attachment: -
15 1. Table LU~I: 2001-2022 Household and Employment Growth Targets.
~GMP~GMPCJMoIO2-3.d~ - 2 -
South Kin. County
4.4.4
Medina
dle
V
a
nM na
P•
nvinotnn
de. Hill
Subareas
'am nad
1 Way
le Valley
Hnmmm King county
d
t
Hoban Kina County
Unincmo King Cmmty
Household HH Capacity PAA HH Job t Job Capacity PAA Job
Target in FAA' Target Targe in PAM Target
1IGMP0O2OMPCJMot02 -3.doc 3
log
6.07j
2-515
1 712
0111
1 605
7.481
i t 5111
1 n56
.per
67
lOR
27.597
9.22&
160 0
2582
89.500
411000
2 0111
14.000
2 ROO
R 8111
R00
500
1 73n
211001
4.637
90527 1
(iii
92081 1
2.601
6941
95,850
75
I 125
1 125
1.175
1.800
5.250
252
U44
dd
77
114
l
221
'11
PAM Potential AnomdeeAnt in Unirlcelp�aled King County Urbea Amen; "Ben flea UPD; lJonb MOT=
The Rini Odes' 0rgeame for die comet city limits and meal expansion area for each city. flat the .......1
for iguanas targets as annexations occur is not to the Waal sides.
252
458 455
446 d%
497 441
701 701
2582 IMO
27
114
221
11.
14 4193 I "4193
4.fy}Zl 4.07
1544 1 694
1.544 I 47.4
EXgmlT g
October 23, 2002
SPonsored By: Executive Committee
1 MOTION NO. 02.-5
2 A MOTION to amend the Urban Separator Map in the
3 Countywide Planning Policies to reflect the negotiated
4 m.odifications of the Renton Urban Separator.
5
6 WHEREAS, ~l~e Growth Management Act states that each Urban Growth Area shall
7 permit urban densities and shall include greenbelt and open space area.s;
8
9 WHEREAS, Urban Separators are an adopted regional strategyserving multiple functions
10 and providing environmental, visual, recreational and wildlife benefits to the citizens and
I I communities of King County;
12'
13 WHEREAS, Consistent With the Countywide Planning Policies, the King C~unty
14 Comprehensive Plan recognizes that Urban Separators ~'oate open space corridOrs, provide
15 a visual contrast to continuous development, and reinforce the unique identities of
16 commUnitiO~;
17
18 WHEREAS, King County has designated Urban Separators on the Land Use 2000 map in
19 the King County Comprehensive ?lan, and King County ha~ provided advance copies of
20 Urban Sepm'ator maps to cities that have designated Urban Separators located within their
21 Potential Annexation Areas;
'22
· 23 ~S, the City of Renton disagreed wi'th Urban Separator.designatien for 76 acres of
24 land within its Potential Annexation Area; .and
26 WH~.REAS, the Grov~h Management Planning Council directed staff to attempt to
27 negotiate a'mutually acceptable resolution of this disagreement
29
30
31
32
34
1
2
:3 THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
4 HEREBY MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
5
6 The Urban Separators map included within the Countywide Planning Policies document is
7 amended to reflect the negotiated modifications of the Renton Urban Separator de~:ribed
8 and mapped in the September 25, 2002 GMPC staff reporC Specifically, 76 acres of
9 unincorporated land is deleted from Urban Separator designation and 118.8 acres within
10 the City of Renton shall be designated Urban Separator.
11
12 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
13 October 23, :2002 in open session.
14
15
16
17
19 .
2O
21
22 Ron Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
U6 MI~20026M PC/M~io~O'2-$ .doc
October 23, 2002
Sponsored By. Executive Committee
1 MOTION NO. 02-6
2 A MOTION to amend the Countywide Planning Policies by
3 designating Totem Lake as an Urban Center. Totem Lake is
4 sdrled to the list of Urban Centers following Countywide
5 Planning Policy LU-39.
7
8 WHEREAS, A goal of the Growth Management Act is to encourage-development in Urban
9 Areas where adequate public facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient manner,
10
11 WHEREAS, Policy LU-39 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes
12 the criteria for Urban Center designation;
13
14 WHEREAS, Policy LU-40 of the Countywide Planning Policies of King County describes
1:5 standards for planned land uses within Urban Centers;
16
17 WHERF. AS, the City of Kirkland has demoustrated that Totem Lake meets the criteria for
18 designation as an Urban Center, .and that Kirkland's "l'otem Lake Activity Ales"
19 designated on the City's comprehensive plan land use map is consistent with the standards
20 established by the County~dde Pi.arming Policies for U~ban Center designation.
21
22 WHEREAs, King County Comprehensive Plan Policy U-106 supports the development of
23 Urban Centers to meet the region's nee~ls for housing, jobs, sendces, culture and
24 recreation.
25
26
27
28
29
.30
31
32
1
2
3
4
5 THE OROWTH MANAGIUVlF_ax~ PLANNING COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY
6 HEPRRy MOVES AS FOLLOWS:
7
8 Totem Lake is designated as an Urban Center. The list of Urban Centers following
9 Countywide Planning Policy LU-39 is modified to include Totem Lake.
10
11 ADOPI'I~D by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on
12 October 23, 2002 in open ~ession.
13
14
15
16
17 ~R
19
2O
21 on Sims, Chair, Growth Management Planning Council
'EXHIBIT G
September 26, 2001
SpOnsored By:. Executive Committee
1 MOTION NO. 01-2
2 . .A MOTION reaffinnhng Motion 99-3 Passed by the (}MPC on lun¢ 16,
3 1999 amending the Countywide Planning Policies to add new policies that
4 address the long-term governance of Agricultural Production Districts.
5
6 ~, The Growth Management Act ~etlaires the maintenance, enhancement and
7 conservation of agricultural industries and lands through a variety of methods and programs;
8
9 WHEREAS, ICing County residents have supported efforts to preserve good farmland and active
10 farms for the value of local erops, d~try and livestock and for sce~fic and histmie values;
11
112 WHEREAS, King County, through the Farmlands Preservation l~ogram, has purchased th~
- 13 development tights of 12,600 acres of farmland and has established the Agricultural .P~uction
14 Dis~cts (APDa) to fiu-thar protect these and adjacent prin~ agricultural lands;
15
16 WHEREAS, the Lower Green River APD is completely surrounded by Urban designated lands and
17 as ~uch is under immense pressure for development and annexation; and'
18 -
19 WlqERF_,~, King County and the City of Auburn have signed an interlocal agreement.thai
20 remOves the southern portion of the Lower Green APD out of the clty's potential annexation area.
21 THE GROWTH MANAGI~fI~NT ~G COUNCIL OF KING 'COUNTY I'IEREBY
2~2 MOVt~ AS FOLLOWS:
23
-24 Reaffirm tho ilrlanlmnus vote by this Council' on luun 16, 1999 to. add the following new
25 Countywide Planning Policies:
26
:27 LU-2A Designated Agricultural Production District lands shall not be annexed by
28 cities.
29
30 LU-2B The Lowel Green River Agricultural Produclion District is a regionally
31 designated resource that is to remain in unincorporated King County.
32 Preservation of the Lower Green River Agricultural Production District will
33 provide an.urban separator as surrounding Urban areas are annexed and
34 developed. King County may contract with other jurisdictions to provide
35 some local services to this area as appropriate.
1
2 ]n the event that this motion is ratified by the member jursdicfions of Growth Management
3 Planning Council, then the Interim Potential Annexation Area Map shall be revised
4 accordingly and the Urban Growth Boundary will be drawn around the Lower Green
5 Agricultural Production Disuict (APD) to clarify that the APD is outside of the Urban area.
6
7 ADOPTED by the Growth Management Planning Council of King County on September 26,.2001
8 in open session.
9
10
.11
14 '
15
16 Ron-"~, Growth Management Planmng Coumul
17
L/G~ 1GIVlPC/Motio~O1-2,doo ~