HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpecial 2003-03-24 Item 3 - Bid Award - Pivetta Brothers Construction for 2003 Infiltration and Inflow Manhole Repairs for $37,829.76CAS Number: 03-039
I Original Sponsor:
I Timeline:
Sponsor's Summary:
Recommendations:
Sponsor:
Committee:
Administration:
Cost Impact (if known):
Fund Source (if known):
Meeting Date
3/24/03
COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS
Meeting Date
3/24/03
SWI M NFORMAI,ANII 1
03 O 3°1 I Original Agenda Date: March 24, 2003
Agenda Item Title: Bid Award for construction of the 2003 Infiltration and Inflow Manhole Repairs
Council
This project will repair /install four manholes throughout the city. The project received twelve
bids to perform the work. The low bid of $36,622.08 was from Gary Harper Construction
Company, yet they requested that their bid be withdrawn. The second lowest bidder was
Pivetta Brothers for $37,829.76. References show that Pivetta Brothers perform quality work
in a timely fashion and has completed similar projects in size and scope.
Award contract to the second lowest bidder, Pivetta Brothers Construction, Inc.
Forward to COW and then Consent Agenda at Special Meeting following.
Same as Sponsor.
$37,829.76 (includes sales tax)
403/02 Sewer Construction Fund (2003 CIP pg. 101)
Attachments
Information memo dated February 28, 2003
Bid tabulation
Utilities Committee Minutes from March 18, 2003
tt
Meeting Date
1 3/24/03
Initials
Prepared by 1 Mayor's review 1 Council review 1
AA/1 MC A/1i/t—(ii— I CPL
U1 1
Admin.
Action
Public Works
ITEM No.
4 a
INFORMATION MEMO
To: Mayor Mullet
From: Public Works Director
Date: February 28, 2003
Subject I I Repairs Project Bid Award
Project No. 97 -SW03
ISSUE
Award the bid for the 2003 I I Repairs Project.
BACKGROUND
Twelve contractors submitted quotes on the 2003 I I Repairs Project. The low bidder was
Gary Harper Construction, Inc., of Redmond, Washington, with a quote of $36,622.08. On
February 11, 2003, Mr. Harper requested his quote be withdrawn from the project due to
items missed in their quote. No bid bond was required on this project due to the limited scope
of the project. The second low bidder was Pivetta Bros. Construction, Inc., of Sumner,
Washington. Pivetta Bros. quote was $37,829.76. No engineer's estimate was prepared, but
engineering and maintenance staff reviewed the 12 quotes and found the low bid in line with
the scope of work for the project. The funds for the 2003 I I Repairs Project are from:
ANALYSIS
MC:Iw
attachment: Bid Tabulation
(P:Pyxu1A -SW P,gaa)97SWO318id Maud Memo 03370)
Fund
2003 CIP
Maintenance Operations
2003 CIP APW Overflow Proiect
TOTAL
2003 1 1 Repairs Proiect
Bid Amount
WSST
Contingency
TOTAL
Bid Results
$34,770.00
3,059.76
3,783.00
$41,612.76
Amount
$30,000.00
3,000.00
8,612.76
$41,612.76
All bids were checked and tabulated and no errors were found. Pivetta Bros. Construction,
Inc., provided references for jobs of similar scope and size of work. References were checked
and found to be satisfactory.
Budget
$41,612.76
$41,612.76
RECOMMENDATION
Award the 2003 I I Repairs Project to Pivetta Bros. Construction, Inc., in the amount of
$37,829.76.
Bidder
Specialized Landscaping, Inc.
Nordic Construction, Inc.
1 Gary Harper Construction, Inc.
C. A. Goodman Construction Co., Inc.
R. L. Alia Co.
Dennis R. Craig Construction, Inc.
Ron's Earthworks, Inc.
Construct Co.
Finishing Edge Curb Sidewalk LLC
Frank Coluccio Construction Co.
Pivetta Bros. Construction, Ina.
Americon, Inc., dba TAB Enterprises
Responsible staff person on project:
Dated this 28th day of January, 2003.
(P:ala1200318,1 Manhole Repairs Bid Results)
CITY OF TUKWILA
BID TABULATION
2003 18r, I Manhole Repairs
Bids Due: Monday, January 27, 2003, 5:00 p.m.
anhole; 1 .Manhole 2 I Manhole 3 Manhole 4 Total
13,464.001 14,862.08 13,464.001 16,211.20 58,001.28
19,177.091 19,177.09 19,177.091 24,203.65 81,734.92
10,053.12 8,247.04 8,268.801 10,053.12 36,622.08
13,056.44 12,732.63 12,894.541 13,955.54 52,639.15
18,496.00 18,496.00 16,320.00 26,112.00 79,424.00
25,003.93 25,003.93 25,003.93 41,591.85 116,603.64
10,575.36 10,210.88 10,297.92 31,312.64 62,396.80
18, 978.961 17, 890.23 17,181.43 22, 837.69 76, 888.31
No Bid
25,024.001 14,144.00 17,408.001 38,896.00 95,472.00
8,660:481 8,595.20 8;660.481 11,913 60 37,829.76
23,876.531
Mike Cusick
16 257 33 15,378.411 21,683.99
77,196.26
Present: Pam Linder, Chair; Joan Hernandez, Dave Fenton
Brian Shelton, Frank Iriarte, Gail Labanara, Mike Cusick, Pat Brodin, Lucy
Lauterbach
1. Inflow and Infiltration R Il Bid Award The Public Works budget has funds for repairing
sewer lines and manhole cover repairs, both of which are needed each year. This year there are
four repairs needed, included leaking manholes and one new manhole. Though no engineer's
budget was prepared, the City received 12 bids for the projects. After one bidder withdrew, the
lowest bidder was Pivetta Brothers Construction, whose bid was considerably lower than the
others. Mike said he was comfortable with the bid, as he has worked with the company in the
past, and their references checked out. The budget will be taken from the $30,000 CIP budget,
plus funds from a CIP project(Andover West overflow project) to cover the $41,612.76 cost
including sales tax and contingency. Recommend bid award to Pivetta Bros for $37. 829.76 to
COW and Special Meeting March 24.
2. Cascade Water Alliance Pat said he wanted to keep the Council updated on the CWA
situation. CWA has completed their SEPA Checklist, and has filled out a Mitigated
Determination of Non Significance (DNS). They have done everything according to the rules, so
Pat thought the Muckleshoot tactic of filing a complaint was a delaying tactic and did not have
standing legally. The tribe wanted CWA to do a full EIS Pat thought the more serious issue was
contract negotiations with Seattle. There has been no movement in the quest to get water from
Seattle until CWA water comes on line. Their current demand is for a 50 -year contract rather
than a 25- year contract. Dave asked how long the water in Lake Tapps would last. Pat thought it
would last maybe 50 years. The Committee asked how difficult it was to use lake water from a
recreational lake, and were told it is a common practice and shouldn't pose a problem.
Information.
Committee chair approval
Utilities Committee
March 18, 2003