Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-10-27 Committee of the Whole MinutesSPECIAL PRESENTATION: TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL October 27, 1997 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers City Hall COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MINUTES CALL TO ORDER: Council President Jim Haggerton called the Committee of the Whole meeting to order and led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Council President Jim Haggerton, Councilmembers Pam Carter, Joe Duffle, Allan Ekberg, Joan Hernandez, Pamela Linder, and Steve Mullet. Absent: Councilmember Joan Hernandez. OFFICIALS: John Rants, Mayor; John McFarland, City Administrator; Rhonda Berry, Assistant City Administrator; Ross Earnst, Public Works Director; Nora Gierloff, Assistant Planner; Viki Witschger, Administrative Services Director; Alan Doerschel, Finance Director; Ron Waldner, Police Chief; Jane Cantu, City Clerk; Steve Lancaster, Community Development Director; Doug Micheau, Public Works Coordinator; and Lucy Lauterbach, Council Analyst. Kina County Airport Master Plan Cynthia Stewart, Manager, King County Airport, distributed copies of her presentation and an executive summary. The Master Plan guides airport development for the next 20 years. Both King County and the FAA require the Master Plan. The last Master Plan was completed 10 years ago. The airport is physically constrained by a river and the Boeing Company on one side and Beacon Hill and railroad tracks on the other side. Additional industrial development north and south of the airport further constricts expanded development of the airport. To accommodate anticipated growth over the next 20 years, 35 acres of new land is required. Due to expansion constraints, there are no plans for expansion. The Master Plan attempts to accommodate growth by using existing space within the current boundaries. Maximizing current parcels is the plan's major focus. Most of the property is tied up in long- term leases ranging from 20 -75 years. Properties would be accrued as parcels come up for renewal during the next 20 years. There are no plans to move tenants who have made long -term capital investments and have long -term leases. This further reduces the degree of any development within the airport. Ms. Stewart referred to phases of planning and indicated inventorying, forecasts, and capacity analysis have been completed. Master Plan Alternatives have been developed and recommendations on the alternatives are expected to be completed by early December. The proposed development plan would be submitted to the King County Council for consideration. If the proposed development plan is adopted it would become the foundation for finalizing the Master Plan. Alternatives include: City of Tukwila City Council of Whole Meeting Minutes 1) Status Quo 2) Air Cargo Emphasis 3) Corporate Emphasis 4) Balanced Program 5) Noise Reduction Emphasis 6) Reduced Operations Page 2 of 13 October 27, 1997 Ruled out early in the process was expansion of the airport, closure of the airport, and major passenger service. The analysis also looked at the economic aspects such as jobs, environmental issues, traffic and noise impacts. The analysis was remarkably the same for each of the categories with no glaring differences. Alternatives number 5 and 6 are not feasible from the perspective they violate a number of requirements in federal law pertaining to non discrimination of airplane landings and tenants, etc. The alternative recommended by the consultant was number 4 the Balanced Program, as it attempts to split the difference between all of the alternatives and did not favor any particular alternative. Since there were no major differences in impacts, alternative 5 responded the best to the mission statement of the airport. It offers flexibility for changing demands and efficient use of space. These changes would lead to a nominal increase in operations, less than one percent a year of growth. The economic foundation of the county would continue to be served with the continuance of airport operations. The airport recognizes noise has become an issue within surrounding communities. However, the airport has little affect on controlling rates, routes, and services of commercial carriers. The FAA controls air operations. Additionally, the FAA requires non discrimination, no interference with interstate commerce, and no diversion of funds. The one vehicle the airport can control is the Part 150 Study. Under the study, the airport plans to conduct a Part 1 Comprehensive Noise Remedy Study. As part of the study, the airport would identify all aircraft who may use the airport now or in the future. Once the conceptual Master Plan Process has been approved, preliminary information concerning the aircraft mix would be used as a basis to work with the FAA and the communities in a negotiation process to examine all the possibilities and remedies which are available and different ways to abate or mitigate the noise. Tukwila will be very much involved in said process. Ms. Stewart concluded her presentation and noted additional information concerning capital projects, cargo operations, a map of existing noise contours, and current and historic airport operations data was included in the handout packet for Council's review. Councilmember Linder expressed her concerns that the study used 1994 cargo flights as the base figure for growth comparison. Those numbers were artificially inflated due the closure of McChord Air Base, which resulted in increased air traffic at King County Airport. Ms. Stewart replied the baseline figures were actually based on a regression analysis which considered the last ten years and carried it out. The regression analysis was compared to other kinds of projections such as economy and population projections and other aircraft projections in other City of Tukwila City Council of Whole Meeting Minutes CITIZEN COMMENT: Page 3 of 13 October 27, 1997 areas of national standards. When all the data was factored, the significance of 1994 data is minimized as a base year. Ms. Stewart offered to provide a graph to compare status quo projections against alternative 4 and indicated the two are not too far apart. Growth will continue, and if a master plan is not adopted it will be more difficult to control the growth. The Part 151 Study for noise cannot proceed without an airport master plan. Councilmembers suggested working with staff to draft the City's response. Ms. Stewart offered to meet with Councilmembers to clarify any of the information contained in the draft plan. Ian Ramos Michael Sisisto. 1222 42 Avenue South. Tukwila. requested use of City vans to meet boy scout transportation needs. His troop is the only boy scout troop in the City and several functions have been missed due to lack of transportation. The troop has tried to unsuccessfully to find transportation to transport the troop to different functions and outings. All the scouts live in Tukwila and parents pay taxes in Tukwila. The troop promotes good citizenship and helps cleanup the community by policing parks and roads. He asked for the Council's consideration to allow troop use of a City van. Mike Firestone. 3709 South 138 Tukwila. said he has been a member of the troop for five years. SeaTac was petitioned for the use of their city van but the troop was turned down since troop members do not live in SeaTac. He asked for the Council's consideration and indicated the troop is the only chartered boy scout troop in Tukwila. He commented on problems with communities not supporting troops and said the troops donate thousands of volunteer hours to the community and collect food for the foodbank at St. Thomas Catholic Church. Mr. Firestone said some cities sponsor troops, provide transportation, or assist in locating financial aid sources. Administrator McFarland indicated the City's insurance provider discourages the use of City property by private citizens. The question is whether the City would be covered for liability in the case of an incident or accident. Ultimately, the citizen's of Tukwila would incur the liability. The City is sympathetic to the needs of its citizens. Mr. Firestone said insurance for the boy scouts is under the umbrella of the Boy Scouts of America. He indicated he would provide a contact for Administrator McFarland regarding the insurance coverage. The request was forwarded to the Community Affairs and Parks Committee for review. Administrator McFarland will follow -up on the insurance from the Boy Scouts of America and provide the information to the Committee. Ron Frimier. 13650 Military Road South. Tukwila. said he has been the past scoutmaster of the cub scouts. Throughout the years, parents have attempted to provide transportation for their outings. The group has expanded considerably and the troop represents Tukwila proudly in many civic events. He asked for the Council's support in assisting with their transportation needs. City of Tukwila City Council of Whole Meeting Minutes SPECIAL ISSUES: Non represented salary study Page 4 of 13 October 27, 1997 Councilmembers Mullet and Duffle said the Council is proud of their achievements and often decisions are based on rules and regulations which the Council has no control over. Councilmember Ekberg suggested the troop contact different car rental agencies to explore the possibility of a corporate donation for use of a rental van for the troop. Director Witschger answered questions pertaining to the final report of the recommended salary structure. Director Witschger indicated the Council had previously requested Mayor Rants to review the recommendation from the advisory committee and provide a written review followed by a discussion with the Council. Last week, the advisory committee reviewed the benefits and formalized a recommendation to Mayor Rants. The recommendations were not forwarded in sufficient time for the Mayor to draft his review. Mayor Rants referred to the previous Council discussion on the issue and noted the Advisory Committee had recommended maintaining the old salary schedule, include a COLA, and review benchmark inconsistencies. The committee has not completed this recommendation. If the Lawson Study were adopted, a 2.2% increase would bring salaries up to market. If the old salary schedule was adopted and a COLA added, salaries would still be 2.2% below market. As far as the benefit package, there is general agreement the overall package is very good. However, long term disability could be improved. Councilmember Carter referred to the consultant's study dated a year ago and noted conclusion number three noted the range was particularly narrow for exempt employee under the Federal Labor Standards Act positions based on contemporary Puget Sound area standards and practices. Mayor Rants indicated one of staff's goals is to work toward implementing the study. The Lawson Study should not be discounted, however some adjustments are needed along with the development of some criteria. Council President Haggerton recommended forwarding the Mayor's review to the Finance and Safety Committee before the Council meeting on November 3. Discussion of Committee of the Whole staffine /minutes Council President opened the discussion on the issue of COW minutes staffing and added several questions to the overall discussion. (1) Is it necessary to hold two COW meetings a month? (2) Would a tape instead of minutes be acceptable? (3) How much reliance is placed on written minutes for reference purposes? (4) Are there any advantages with meeting at 6:00 p.m. versus 7:00 p.m. Director Witschger said a full -time position was reduced to part-time earlier in the year, which has reduced staffs ability to adequately accomplish all tasks. City Clerk Cantu has researched some options to contract with an outside transcriptionist service to transcribe COW meeting City of Tukwila City Council of Whole Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 13 October 27, 1997 minutes. This would free up staff to perform the functions of the City Clerk's office and possibly save the City some money. Director Witschger recommended having Analyst Lauterbach run the tapes and include notes on the meeting agenda with the recording time noted for easier reference. Councilmembers roundtabled the discussion and agreed COW meetings are required but expressed concerns with receiving lengthy meeting minutes which would require longer reading time. City Clerk Cantu suggested notes could be taken by Analyst Lauterbach highlighting the main points of the discussion. Some cities use experienced transcriptionists who are familiar with City business and are able to pull the information together and produce an accurate representation of the meeting. Councilmembers concurred with contracting temporarily with a transcriptionist service to "test drive" the service before contracting long -term. An ordinance regarding transfers, salary increases, bids, and unbudgeted eauinment or fixed asset items Council President Haggerton read the title of the draft ordinance for the record. Director Doerschel indicated the only change reflected in the ordinance concerns changing the fixed asset from $500 to 1,000 to reduce record keeping and save staff time. Most other cities have established the fixed asset account at $1,000. The current fixed asset limit of $500 was established in 1984. Councilmembers discussed the proposed language in Section 3.46.040 and indicated the use of "capital equipment" and "fixed asset" was confusing. Administrator McFarland said the changes accomplish two things: (1) raising the limit by which we define capital equipment, and (2) affirming unbudgeted capital equipment requires approval by the Mayor and three affirmative votes from the Finance and Safety Committee. Council President Haggerton moved the ordinance to the next regular Council meeting for adoption. An ordinance designating the Finance Director of the City as the official authorized to make declarations of official intent on behalf of the City. Director Doerschel indicated the ordinance is to fulfill a requirement of the Bond Council when the City issues bonds. Currently, when the City issues bonds Director Doerschel has been initiating a document pertinent to each bond issue rather than having an all- inclusive ordinance which would apply to all bond issues. Council President Haggerton moved the ordinance to the next regular Council meeting for adoption. City of Tukwila City Council of Whole Meeting Minutes Zonine code amendments: 1) Brew pubs 2) Essential public facilities 3) Height limitation Family Fun Center Page 6 of 13 October 27, 1997 Director Lancaster said the amendments have been to the Planning Commission from previous referral by the Council. The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on the ordinances and recommends approval, with one change of including an additional decision criteria for essential public facilities. The addition is to require undergrounding of public facilities wherever necessary. Councilmember Ekberg noted the Community Affairs and the Parks Committee reviewed the three ordinances and was pleased to see the Planning Commission agree with the Committee's recommendation including the additional recommendation. Director Lancaster said the additional recommendation includes the broad definition of "facilities" to include anything which could be undergrounded. Councilmembers concurred to move the amendments to the regular Council meeting for a public hearing on November 3, 1997. Subdivision ordinance deliberations Director Lancaster reviewed progress to date on the status of the subdivision ordinance. Public hearings have been completed on the ordinance. Director Lancaster said staff is prepared to review issues with Council during its deliberations. Councilmembers discussed and reviewed items requiring further deliberation. The review included the following items where no consensus had been reached. Eliminate the PRD requirement for short plats and boundary line adjustments (TMC 18.45.060 Zonine Code). Discussion: The Planning Commission recommended the elimination of the APRD requirement for short plats and boundary line adjustments. The main reason for recommended elimination concerned the minimum requirement for open space with respect to smaller parcels and boundary line adjustments. Councilmembers concurred not to require APRD's for BLA's as recommended by the Planning Commission. Deliberations continued concerning APRD requirements for short plats. Councilmembers concurred to remove the APRD requirement for both short plats and boundary line adjustments. City of Tukwila City Council of Whole Meeting Minutes Phasinu of Final Plat (TMC 17.14.040) Councilmembers concurred with allowing phasing of final plats. Page7of 13 October 27, 1997 Discussion: Currently the code is silent on the ability to phase a final plat. Many communities do allow phasing the final plat so at the preliminary plat stage, the rules are set for the entire development. Once the rules are set, the property owner can complete the final plat on several of the lots, as long as the facilities to serve the lots are completed. The option provides some flexibility in terms of phasing a development. Councilmember Ekberg asked if the ordinance passes with Council's support of the different alternatives, would a development have the opportunity to come in through phasing. Director Lancaster said he would need to check with Attorney Noe and referred to Washington State Law which has a provision stating a final plat must be judged by the laws in effect at the time the preliminary plat was adopted. Typically, when a more liberal law is available, developers could take advantage of it. He believes this would provide an option to any preliminary plat in progress which has not been finalized. Short Plat Road Standards (TMC 17.20.030(c)(6). Discussion: Director Lancaster said for short plats of five or more, the current ordinance requires improvements to interior roads and exterior roads adjacent to the development to City standards. However, the adjacent public streets can be improved to a half street standard. The interior streets must be improved to City standards. For short plats of four (4) lots or less, the policy is not clear regarding the improvement of the interior and exterior streets. In most short plats, interior streets would be included along with adjacent exterior streets. Many times, the adjacent public street is not improved to City standards. Many communities require a no- protest L.I.D agreement so improvements are made either by the City or by other property owners at an appropriate time. Those property owners who benefit from the improvements are required to participate. Councilmember Duffie cited an example of two short plats located side by side and asked if after one of the plats was developed, would those homeowners be required to participate in a L.I.D for the second plat's road improvements. Director Lancaster responded that if a development pays for a street to serve its development there is no a mechanism to force other homeowners located next to the street to pay for improvements, unless a previous agreement or L.I.D has been executed. Councilmembers discussed different scenarios of development situations and how each alternative might apply. Director Lancaster reminded Councilmembers that L.I.D's require Council approval. Director Lancaster shared what other communities typically do concerning short plat road standards. Most jurisdictions require completion of the internal road system before final approval of the short plat. The problem most often encountered is when two adjacent short plats share a common exterior street which does not meet City standards. One of the main reasons jurisdictions allow no protest agreements in those situations is often the ultimate design of the external street has not been designed at the time development occurred. City of Tukwila City Council of Whole Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 13 October 27, 1997 Discussion continued on situations of internal roads located within short plats eventually building out to become a thoroughfare and what standards should apply in those situations. Councilmembers concurred to require short plats of four (4) lots or less to conform to private road standards for internal streets which would not become a future thoroughfare. Ranee of Road Widths (TMC 17.20.030(c)(61. Discussion: The proposal provides a range of road widths and states the smaller width range would prevail unless there were some special circumstances where safety or other considerations would require a wider road width. The Planning Commission recommended providing a range for both the roadway and right -of -way widths, and in normal circumstances the lower range would be used with the City having discretion of increasing either the roadway or right -of -way widths if circumstances dictated such. The roadway width is measured from curb to curb. Right of -way is typically the sidewalk area. Councilmembers concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendations. Standards Relatine to Emereencv Access. Discussion: Director Lancaster said the recommendation from the Planning Commission is not a change from current practice, however the Fire Department has expressed some concerns with the current standards and would like Council to review some proposed changes. The existing standard for cul -de -sac turnaround roadway pavement is 60 feet. The Fire Department recommends 81 feet. Additionally, a standard in the current code allows for a maximum street grade of 15 which could be increased to 18% for short distances, if approved by the Fire Marshal. The Fire Department recommends retaining the current street grade standard of 15 Councilmember Carter referred to a newspaper article which recommended building smaller fire trucks so larger cul -de -sacs would not be needed. Councilmembers discussed pros and cons of expanding the cul -de -sac standard and concurred not to increase the standard for short plats between 5 to 9 lots and to increase the standard as recommended by the Fire Department for multi- family and commercial zones. Councilmembers concurred with expanding the street grade standard to 18% with discretionary determination for each instance by the Fire Marshal. Director Lancaster referred to the issues raised by the Council during previous reviews. Remaining issues include the following: Can the Citv require frontate dedication as Hart of a short plat? Responding to a question from Councilmember Mullet concerning item 1, Director Lancaster indicated Council agreed short plats between 5 and 9 lots require posting and mailed notices, while short plats of 4 lots or under, would not require public notice unless SEPA is triggered. City of Tukwila City Council of Whole Meeting Minutes Page 9 of 13 October 27, 1997 Director Lancaster referred to item 4 and indicated the City currently has authority to require frontage improvements and dedication of additional right -of -way if necessary for subdivisions and 5 -9 lot short plats. The issue concerns whether the code should allow for additional dedication, if needed, for short plats. Staff has drafted recommended language which provides for right -of -way to be acquired if necessary to meet minimum street width standards or when lack of such dedication would cause or contribute to an unsafe road or intersection. The second issue relates to allowing cul -de -sacs. The proposal includes Council direction and preference of streets with an egress and ingress. Councilmember Mullet has recommended an additional provision to allow cul -de -sacs when there is no reasonable alternative or the cul -de -sac is shown on an officially adopted street plan. When allowed, they shall not exceed a length of six hundred (600) feet. Councilmembers discussed and generally agreed there are community benefits of allowing cul- de -sacs in residential zones but were less agreeable to allowing cul -de -sacs in commercial zones. Councilmember debated the merits of cul -de -sacs and through streets and the fact, that in many developments there might not be an option for a through street. Director Lancaster said cul -de- sacs increase traffic to thoroughfare roads and although they provide some safety for children, City policy prefers through streets to cul -de -sacs. He suggested revising the language to clarify the intent of allowing cul -de -sacs in both residential and commercial while at the same time discouraging their use. Councilmembers agreed with the recommendation. Should the Subdivision Code be snecific about the status /need to remove non- residential structures (accessory buildings) from newly created lots having residential structure? Discussion: Director Lancaster reviewed the issue and concerns with allowing non residential buildings to remain on newly developed residential lots. At the request of Council, staff drafted proposed language to address the issue. The proposed language states if a subdivision, short plat, or boundary line adjustment in a residential zone would result in an accessory structure remaining alone on a lot the structure must be demolished before preliminary approval or the owner must provide a bond in the amount of 150% of the cost of demolition and assurance that the accessory structure will be demolished if a residence is not built on the lot within 12 months of final approval. Director Lancaster reported he would update the document for Council's final review. Non conforming use deliberations Director Lancaster said a public hearing was held on the proposed ordinance on June 23, 1997. Several people who testified expressed concerns with several aspects of the proposed restrictions. Both individuals testified against the provisions of prohibiting conversions of one non- conforming use to another. Staff supports the Planning Commission's recommendations as contained in the draft ordinance. Director Lancaster said proposed changes were compared with other jurisdictions and the grace City of Tukwila Page 10 of 13 City Council of Whole Meeting Minutes October 27, 1997 period ranges anywhere from three to twelve months. Twenty -four months is generous compared to other communities. Council President moved the proposed ordinance to the next regular Council meeting for final review and adoption. Lodainff Tax Advisory Committee nronosal Mayor Rants advised the Council a minimum 45 -day review and comment period is required from the date the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee considers and recommends a tax and funding proposals. The next meeting of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee is scheduled for November 4. Mayor Rants indicated he was hoping for Council discussion on some of the funding ideas in order to solidify by November 3, recommendations to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. Mayor Rants referred to the compilation of possible funding proposals which have been reviewed and suggested by the Council, staff, and the advisory committee. Staff organized the list into a more logical sequence as to the use of the funding. Mayor Rants referred to previous Council discussions concerning the direction to take with respect to promoting economic development and revitalization of Tukwila. He noted one funding proposal pertained to transportation improvements activities and asked the Council to consider allocating funding in some form or another to promote the development of the expo center. The expo center would benefit the City economically. He cautioned the City should not be involved in the development activities of the developer or give the appearance of doing so. Director Doerschel indicated he has reviewed legal ways for the City to financially support activities related to the development of the expo center. He has checked with the Bond Council regarding the legalities of City support involving the development of the expo center. The recommendations (within the legal restraints) relate to funding for transportation activities related to improving traffic circulation, parking facilities, and investing in other multi -modal efforts. This is essentially a strategy to make several things happen, all of which comply with City policies and qualify the City to use the hotel lodging tax as the funding source. The goal is to provide a return on the City's investment. The recommendation must be presented to the advisory committee to be considered and suggested using the language as drafted. The advisory committee must receive funding requests in order to consider funding recommendations. Director Doerschel recommended forwarding the information to the Finance and Safety Committee for their meeting on November 3. Council President Haggerton suggested the Council review and discuss the information and forward to the Finance and Safety Committee meeting on November 4. The Committee's recommendations would then be reviewed at the regular Council meeting on November 4 and forwarded to the Lodging Tax Advisory Board for their meeting on Tuesday, November 4. Council President Haggerton said several issues were raised during the first Lodging Tax Advisory Committee meeting. Hotel representatives from local hotels were excited about the planned expo center and agreed the expo center would do a lot for the area and increase local hotel business. The second issue concerned the tax rate with Committee members unsure of City of Tukwila Page 11 of 13 City Council of Whole Meeting Minutes October 27, 1997 what rate to establish. Time wise, SeaTac is behind Tukwila in organizing and establishing an advisory committee. Hotel representatives from Tukwila have a close working relationship with hotel representatives in SeaTac. They expressed concerns Tukwila would be too far ahead in the process of imposing a hotel tax. Committee members also expressed an interest for a south King County Convention Bureau and felt the Seattle Convention Bureau ignores their needs. Discussion continued on the ramifications of imposing a 1% hotel tax versus a .5% tax and who would be affected. Council President Haggerton informed the Council a recommendation for the hotel tax percentage could also be forwarded to the advisory committee in time for its November 4 meeting. Director Doerschel said advisory committee members were not as concerned with the competitive aspect of a slight difference in tax rates but were more concerned with maintaining continuity between the jurisdictions. They also expressed a strong desire to work with Renton and SeaTac on a joint convention bureau effort. Councilmember Ekberg pointed out the City has never issued a policy statement concerning its desire to see an expo center built in Tukwila and it may be the time. The City would use the lodging tax opportunity where appropriate. Councilmembers concurred to forward the issue to the Finance and Safety Committee for its review on November 3. REPORTS: a. Mayor: Mayor Rants referred to the report from the Spellman Company and Assistant Berry's oversight role in working with the consultant. Administrator McFarland explained the objective with working with the consultant is to find more ways to convey a positive message about the City of Tukwila. Councilmember Ekberg suggested delaying discussion on the issue until Council has an opportunity to review the information. Mayor Rants referred to a memo on "Connections" from the Human Services Roundtable and indicated it related to regional governance and finance issues and recommended the Council review the information. Mayor Rants attended a Chamber presentation on an economic impact study and received a packet of information on housing, wages, jobs, transportation, and other relevant economic information. b. City Council: Council President Haggerton attended the first meeting of the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee on October 21. The next meeting is on November 4 at the Museum of Flight. City of Tukwila Page 12 of 13 City Council of Whole Meeting Minutes October 27, 1997 Council President Haggerton reported on recent meetings he attended. They include an EDAB meeting on October 23, a Chamber Government Affairs social for candidates, a Foster Community Candidates Forum, and on Sunday, October 26, a social for Friends of Foster Library. Councilmember Ekberg is scheduled to attend a Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting. Topics include employees at the community center and green fees. His philosophy is "whatever is good for the employees is good for citizens" and noted City discounts should apply to both employees and citizens. Councilmember Mullet reported he also helped with planting trees. Councilmember Carter reported on her attendance at the SCKATBD meeting. She also attended the social for Friends of Foster Library. Next, she reported the Transportation Committee authorized the Public Works Department to join a consortium for $500 a year to obtain information on facilities and maintenance issues. The organization provides templates for different types of contracts and updates members on changes in regulations. Committee action also included the approval to order new police cars (to be delivered in April 1998). Another subject discussed was the Amtrak station. SCATBd has indicated its support for an Amtrak commuter rail station in south King County. The location site will most likely be determined on the basis of where the largest number of paying passengers are located. Councilmember Linder attended a community meeting at Ryan Hill. c. Staff No report. d. City Attorney: Administrator McFarland indicated Attorney Noe is preparing a brief for submission on October 31 to the Court of Appeals on a motion made by Deja Vu. The motion is for an injunction against impending action by the City. Attorney Noe is also working on a forfeiture ($14,000) hearing and the Ball apartment issue. There are two issues involved with the Ball apartments. There is a Court of Appeals issue on Mr. Ball's appeal of the lower court's decision on sanctions and then there is the trial scheduled for June 1998. City of Tukwila Page 13 of 13 City Council of Whole Meeting Minutes October 27, 1997 ADJOURNMENT: Moved by Councilmember Duffle, seconded by Council President Haggerton, to adjourn the COW meeting at 11:00 p.m. Motion carried (7 -0). C .',A-- Counc resident J ggerton 4 i Jane. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk for Val ie Gow, Recording Secretary Date Minutes Approved: /99