HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-11-23 Committee of the Whole MinutesEXECUTIVE SESSION 6:30 D.M.
Labor Issue Pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i)
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MINUJTES 7:00 D.M.
CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council President Pamela Linder called
the Regular meeting to order at 7:00, in Council Chambers, City Hall, and led the Pledge of
Allegiance.
COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Council President Pamela Linder, Councilmembers Joe
Duffie, Joan Hernandez, Steve Mullet, Pam Carter, Jim Haggerton and Dave Fenton.
OFFICIALS: City Administrator, John McFarland, Mayor John W. Rants, Deputy City Clerk,
Bob Baker; Legislative Analyst, Lucy Lauterbach; Finance Director, Alan Doerschel; Public
Works Director, Ross Earnst and Department of Community Development Director, Steve
Lancaster.
CITIZEN COMMENT:
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL
November 23, 1998
Council Chambers City Hall
Georgina Kerr. 3836 So. 116th St.. Tukwila. spoke in "adamant opposition" to the proposal for
light rail in her (Duwamish Community) neighborhood. She and others will gather signatures on
a petition stating same. Said petition also has the backing of the Duwamish Improvement Club.
She presented Council with a letter and noted her husband would like to read the letter into the
record.
Councilmember Carter noted the City was not the authority responsible for the proposed
placement of light rail and therefore not the correct venue for the petition. Council President
Linder stated if presented to the Council, they would forward the petition to the proper authority.
Councilmember Duffie inquired of Ms. Kerr why she had not attended any other meetings before
this one to make her opposition known.
Mr. Kerr responded she is a new resident to the community; had trouble understanding the maps
associated with the plan; sought the help of responsible officials and received none; and like
other community members, thought the project would go on railroad tracks, not their back yards.
She assured Council she is now following the matter closely and is actively involved in its
opposition.
Ron Kerr. 3836 So. 116th St.. Tukwila. stated he is happy to live in his neighborhood as it is a
unique place to live. He would like to preserve its uniqueness. He noted there are other areas for
the light rail which seem more likely and /or reasonable. He asked Council not to allow the
installation of the light rail along Interurban.
City of Tukwila Page 2 of 12
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes November 23, 1998
Next, Mr. Kerr read his prepared letter into the record.
Councilmember Haggerton asked Kerr and any others in the audience who may submit written
comments to be sure and clearly indicate whether they are opposed to the entire project or the
sections which may abut, or be near their property lines.
Ms. Kerr asked if a transportation tunnel had been considered.
Councilmember Carter stated it has been considered; however, the Transit Authority will do
nothing which will increase a cost or cause a delay in timelines. Topography is a key issue or
factor for tunnels. It would appear that tunneling may go through in other parts of the State, but
not south of Seattle. She informed all there are no elected officials from this area, except Ron
Sims, who sit on the RTA Board.
Sharon Ronning. 11705 40th Ave. So.. Tukwila, stated she did not know about the light rail
issue except from hearsay. She is learning quickly. She asked the City Council to lobby for the
residents against the light rail. Next, she read a letter into the record from 9 -year old Tori
Murphy, Tukwila Elementary. The letter, in part, asked Council not to allow the light rail in
order than personal injuries, up to and including death, may be prevented.
Al White. 14202 149th Pl. SE. Renton. stated he has owned 5 acres in Tukwila since 1960 and
has never received notices of meetings /public hearings. He feels notice was not received due to
the fact he lives outside the City of Tukwila. He asked that light rail not be allowed in the area
because "trains kill people." He spoke of the misfortunes of death related to the Spirit of
Washington Dinner Train which travels from Renton. He asked Council please send him notices
when these types of issues arise.
Councilmember Haggerton stated the City can take responsibility for the inadequacy of notices
when they are sent by City staff; however, notice for this particular issue is from Sound
Transit /Regional Transit Authority.
Councilmember Carter reminded those in the audience, light rail is not a City- sponsored project.
It is being handled by Sound Transit /Regional Transit Authority.
Councilmember Hernandez thanked those citizen who attended this meeting. She stated the
Tukwila City Council is not the decision maker in this process. She informed them of a January
13 Public Meeting at the Tukwila Community Center.
Mayor Rants informed the citizens lobbyist money will be spent in advocacy of their position.
He stated there are other alternatives which can and will be considered as the City deals with
Sound Transit.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
a. 1999 Budget:
City of Tukwila
Council President Linder declared the public hearing open at 7:26 p.m.
Finance Director, Alan Doerschel, explained budgeting processes used by the City.
CITIZEN COMMENT:
Page 3 of 12
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes November 23, 1998
(1) An Ordinance Adopting the 1999 Proposed Budget
(2) A Resolution Approving the 1999 -2004 Financial Planning Model and Capital
Improvement Plan
Dave Kisler. 14741 62nd Ave. So.. Tukwila, presented Council with a single page
memorandum from the King County Library System to Mr. Kisler, as the President of the
Tukwila Library Board. Said memorandum seeks funding from the City of Tukwila in the
amount of $15,840.00 for the use of a uniformed police officer at the Foster Library to provide a
safe and secure environment for patrons using the library.
Mr. Kisler reported, as does the memorandum, several incidents per day, require police
intervention; and although the Library receives very good support from the Police, the
department cannot devote all of their time to the library between the hours most affected (2:30
5:30 p.m.). He also indicated the problems are escalating in terms of their nature.
Council President Linder noted the complexity of this issue which involves entities other than the
City. She suggested Council refer this item to a Committee for action due to its seriousness.
From comments of Council and questions of Mr. Kisler, it was learned this is not a new problem
and their was consensus among the Library Board to seek funding for security.
Councilmember Haggerton noted this issue will be added to the next Finance Committee agenda
for consideration.
Dennis Robertson. 16038 48th Ave. So.. Tukwila spoke against using boat ramps as a
placeholder in the 1999 budget. This disturbs him due to the fact efforts have been made in the
last five years to make the river an amenity; yet there is no access to it. He is also concerned
with the amount of money set aside for these ramps. The size of the ramp is misleading to the
public. They are closer in size to a canoe ramp which could actually be created under a small
works project. He described the envisioned canoe, or very small row boat ramp being next to an
existing park such as Bicentennial Park or on 188th. Mr. Robertson then spoke against
motorized boats on the river. Access to the river could be achieved at a small price.
Anna Bernhard. 14241 59th Ave. So.. Tukwila. spoke in opposition to spending $50,000.00
on the continued fight of the third runway issue. She stated the City has spent enough money on
the fight and the money could be used in other areas.
Councilmember Carter asked Mr. Doerschel how important retail sales tax is to our budget.
City of Tukwila
Council President Linder closed the public hearing at 7:50 p.m.
Page 4 of 12
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes November 23, 1998
Carter's heard others speaking erroneously lately that sales taxes really aren't that important.
In response, Mr. Doerschel informed all present the City is expecting $14 Million is retail sales
in 1999; approximately 11 /25ths of the total budget. And, property taxes are expected in an
approximate amount of $8 Million. Together, these amounts equal 65% of the total budget.
Councilmember Hernandez clarified the contribution to the ACC in the amount of $50,000.00 is
actually a reduction from the usual $100,000.00.
Councilmember Haggerton reported attendance at two recent community meetings within the last
week wherein community support was expressed for the continued fight against the third runway.
b. Amendments to the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code as Part of the
Annual Amendment Process
Council President Linder opened the public hearing at 7:51 p.m.
Carol Lumb was present to answer any questions of the Council.
CITIZEN COMMENT:
Dennis Robertson. 16038 48th Ave. So.. Tukwila, reviewed and spoke to several of the
proposed changes. As it relates to proposed change #4, Mr. Robertson is opposed to
modifications to the current setback standards where the NCC, RC and Mixed Use zones abut
residential zoning. He suggests the following addition, "except where such zones abut Low
Density, Medium Density, or High Density Residential zones."
Secondly, as it relates to proposed change #6, Dennis suggested the addition of the following
language, "where such landscape and setbacks are between adjoining commercially zoned lots."
Finally, as it relates to change #3, Mr. Robertson stated crime has been drastically reduced and
redevelopment is being proposed for Highway 99. Thus, he wonders why the City would open
the density door to no limits; and that if there is a specific, limited purpose for this change, then
the wording should be more specific and limited. Otherwise, it should be dropped from the
changes.
Byron Saunders. 4118 So. 130th. Tukwila, chose not to speak when his name was called.
Eric Laschever. from Preston. Gates Ellis. 701 5th Ave.. Suite 500. Seattle. appeared on
behalf of Sound Transit with Desmond Brown, General Counsel and Leonard McGhee, Project
Coordinator. Mr. Laschever stated Sound Transit is very committed to providing opportunity for
the public and noted if a copy of these minutes were provided, he would ensure those who spoke
earlier would be added to Sound Transit's mailing list, if they did not already appear on same.
With regard to proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan, he stated some of his concerns.
City of Tukwila
Page 5 of 12
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes November 23, 1998
One, a substantive concern, the basic issue is the balance between the City's rightful authority to
make sure impacts of the project are properly addressed without precluding the locating of a
facility. The items touched upon by Mr. Laschever were addressed via letter to the City, from
Sound Transit and included in the packet for this meeting.
An important point is the proposed amendment to Goal 15.2.4 of the Comprehensive Plan. He
stated his understanding of the idea behind the proposed amendment. Sound Transit's concern is
there are other mechanisms such as SEPA to deal with mitigation of environmental impacts and
the like. Requiring compensation or incentive, when based on the idea the facility is costing the
City something, creates the question of how does any one jurisdiction balance between the
benefits of a transit facility provides and the costs associated therewith. Further, if every
jurisdiction requires Sound Transit to provide incentives before locating a facility, the costs in
the end, preclude the building of the system at all.
Councilmember Carter sought clarification on one issue. She stated Council had previously been
told that because they control the zoning; if a place exists within the City where Council does not
desire the light rail, Sound Transit would not put it there. She believes this to be in disagreement
with what she is hearing from Mr. Laschever. He replied a response letter may be in order. He
stated this issue doesn't get so much to where a facility would be located, but to the conditions
being put on the project and their being overly burdensome for installation/location at all within
the City.
Leonard McGhee, Project Coordinator for Sound Transit Light Rail, addressed Councilmember
Carter. Mr. McGhee stated that as a general matter, the policy of Sound Transit is to work very
carefully with local government to avoid that type of situation. The ultimate siting decision on
alignments and station locations will be made by Sound Transit through the public participation
process. That does not mean there isn't a very strong effort to coordinate memorandums of
understanding with the cities, to share information and to receive input early in the process. It is
a partnership effort to come to good decisions together.
Councilmember Haggerton, referring to undergrounding the route, stated it sounded as though it
might be somewhat favorable, but money wasn't available for it. That bothers him. He said we
may be building the routes wrong just because "that's the money" there to spend. This may be
the wrong approach. If the money is not available to build the system correctly to get maximum
ridership, it should not be built.
Mr. Laschever stated undergrounding does not have to do with ridership. The challenge is to
find a system the voters are comfortable paying for and building within those constraints. If a
system is built entirely underground, the costs would be prohibitive. You must find an adequate
balance and stay within budget to allow the system being built.
Dennis Robertson. 16038 48th Ave. So.. Tukwila, commented that after his quick review of
the materials provided by Sound Transit, it seemed the original language, before modifications,
ensures Sound Transit works with the City. It seems to him it serves the same purpose Sound
Transit is proposing; that they, indeed, work with the City of Tukwila.
City of Tukwila
Page 6 of 12
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes November 23, 1998
Council President Linder closed the public hearing at 8:19 p.m.
SPECIAL ISSUES:
a. An Ordinance Amending the 1998 Budget
Councilmember Haggerton noted went before the Finance Safety Committee on November 16
for consideration. This is an item which comes before the Council each year.
Finance Director, Alan Doerschel, explained the inclusions to the ordinance.
There was consensus of Council to include this item on the December 7 agenda.
b. An Ordinance Levying 1999 Property Taxes
Councilmember Haggerton recommended this item be placed on the next regular agenda.
Councilmember Carter asked if the 1999 rate would be the same as the 1998 rate. Mr. Doerschel
answered in the affirmative. We are not raising the rate.
There was consensus among Council to include this item on the December 7 agenda.
c. An Ordinance Approving a Water Rate Increase
Councilmember Mullet noted this is a pass through rate increase by the City of Seattle. Their
increase was approximately 40% or approximately 14% when juggled through the City's rates.
He also noted that there is a .02 cent increase for conservation programs.
Finance Director Doerschel, in response to a question from Council President Linder, noted the
increase will be seen on the January 31, 1999, water bills.
Councilmember Haggerton noted there have been times when Tukwila did not pass through these
rate increases to the citizens. We must, however, pass them through this time
There was consensus among Council to include this item on the December 7 agenda.
d. A Resolution Amending the Hartford Deferred Compensation Plan
Mr. Doerschel noted the Federal government made some recent changes to the law regarding
deferred compensation. The biggest change deferred compensation is no longer a part of the
City's assets. This is a benefit for the employees, not the Cities. That requires a contract change
and ordinance to reflect same.
He noted limits and options have also been raised. All language changes have been reflected in a
handout provided to Council.
City of Tukwila Page 7 of 12
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes November 23, 1998
Council President Linder asked for clarification to draft Finance Safety Committee minutes.
Mr. Doerschel noted Hartford has stated that if an employee has $3,500.00 in an account for two
years and has been inactive for that period of time, Hartford can send the employee a check in
that amount and remove them from the system.
There was consensus among Council to include this item on the December 7 agenda.
e. Possible Options to Address Local and Regional Transportation Needs by Means
of Local Option Transportation Revenues and Potential Legislative Strategies
Councilmember Carter prepared the materials for this item and reviewed them with Council after
noting there are numerous acronyms used when addressing the issue of transportation.
Ms. Carter has been attending the Moving King County 2000 meetings. She said as officials
begin talking more specifically about supporting or not supporting the local option gas tax for the
County roadways, feedback from Council is sought.
There are regional arterials which truly need improvements such as Highway 99, which runs
through a number of different Cities. The City of SeaTac has begun their improvements. The
Cities of Tukwila and Burien as sure to follow. The King County Public Works Directors have
chosen to use a project list in the Puget Sound Regional Council (PRSC) 6 -Year Action Strategy
rather than attempting to create a list from scratch. Included as a subset of that list is the
Regional Arterial Network (RAN) with 140 projects totaling nearly $873 million. There are no
funds available for these projects; therefore, funding possibilities need discussing.
A possibility several King County Councilmembers came up with earlier this year is the local
option gas tax. In fact, some wanted it included on the November ballot. The Moving King
County 2000 group convinced the Council it should not be included thereon. No county in the
State, however, has been able to obtain a local option gas tax because it has to go to a vote of the
people.
The Legislature has allowed cities and counties to do a couple things to raise money for
transportation. One being a street utility tax which was declared invalid by the Courts. There is
also a parking tax which works for Tukwila because we have paid parking; however, we are one
of the very few. Other options are employee parking tax, shoppers parking tax, head tax, etc.
King County is already charging an Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET) so the City may not
impose same. Someone suggested approaching the Legislature for an excise tax on auto products
and services. That did not gather enough support for consideration.
The Governor's Blue Ribbon Commission will look at the transportation picture on a state -wide
basis and determine from where funding sources will be derived. Their report, however, will not
be out until December, 1999. If anything controversial is recommended, the legislature may not
support it due to election year 2000. Thus, we may wait until 2001.
City of Tukwila
Page 8 of 12
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes November 23, 1998
With that background, Councilmember Carter asked where we stand. Should we take care of our
business and hope we can convince the State in a few years to assume their responsibilities as it
relates to transportation?
Gas tax is a flat tax, so as the price of gas goes up, the tax stays the same. That is one of the
reasons transportation funding in the State has declined. The tax is essentially going down.
Should it therefore be raised from 10 to 20 4.6 cents per gallon? There is a problem, though,
with distribution of those proceeds. It is based solely on population. The unincorporated portion
of the County receives 1.5 times its population and the cities receive only one times their
population in dollars. Therefore she asked is there a better formula for distribution. Another
formula road miles, population and workers, may be a possibility. This may be a more fair
distribution; but the change would have to be affected through the legislature.
It was also suggested that the Committee convince the Legislature to change it so a County
Council could enact the local option gas tax, but the voters would have the right of referendum
and could thus get signatures on a petition and then have the item placed on a ballot to reject
what the Council had done.
Distribution of the money, under this scenario, was questioned by Council President Linder. Ms.
Carter said the money would be distributed under whatever formula was in State legislation.
Currently, the formula is the 1.5 times to the County and one (1) to the cities, based upon
population.
The County Road Levy was discussed next. Essentially, it can be used for everything; however
it is traditionally used for transportation projects. She is aware of only two counties which utilize
the funds for projects other than transportation.
At this point, Councilmember Carter asked for the general feelings of her fellow
Councilmembers.
Councilmember Mullet said one of the problems with the voters is they do not believe monies
collected are really going towards roads. He said if a tax is placed on gasoline, it should be spent
on roads alone; not transit; and then it might have a chance at voter approval. Councilmember
Carter said that is, indeed, the current policy with the local option gas tax.
Councilmember Haggerton stated the mechanism for handling monies received should be
directed to municipalities. King County should not be involved in the equation. It could be
handled just like the City's portion of the sales tax or excise tax, which is allocated to the City by
a code directly to the city involved.
Council President Linder spoke in favor of using the distribution formula mentioned earlier
wherein road miles, population and workers are the considering factors; anything other than
residential population.
City of Tukwila Page 9 of 12
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes November 23, 1998
Councilmember Hernandez feels as though the Legislature didn't have the courage to deal with
increasing the local option gas tax to use for roads, and the City doesn't have enough clout to
change their decision.
Ms. Carter stated this would hopefully be an alignment between the Puget Sound region as well
as other parts of the State. Before the last legislative session began, the Republicans decided
there would no raising of the gas tax. So it was not even an option or even discussed.
Councilmember Mullet said if we were going to ask for a recommendation, that it should
definitely be a percentage. That is what the Legislature should change, rather than doubling the
rate. He said another concern is as cars become more efficient and burn less gas; and, as there
are more of them on the roads, the City will receive less money. That is an issue which impacts
the entire situation.
Mayor Rants said he's heard of things which might occur if the tax was passed; but what he has
not heard is discussion on whether or not the Council wants to do it at all. Before Council
determines what percentages or formulas should be used, they must determine if they are
supportive of a local option gas tax. Then, consideration could be given as to conditions.
Council President Linder spoke in favor of waiting until the report comes out from the Blue
Ribbon Commission in order to make informed decisions. Spokane County is in favor of same.
Ms. Carter noted State funding is not the only funding we use for arterial improvements. There
are also federal funds such as T21.
Councilmember Haggerton stated he cannot understand why the Legislature is so middle of the
road about doing anything. He said if you look back to the late 1960's to the early 1980's, we
had the best freeway systems, roads and lowest priced gas anywhere. The same is not true today.
The roads are terribly deteriorated and something must be done. We must come up with a
funding source to repair them. It is his opinion that a few cents gas tax on a gallon of gas is not
going to hurt the average citizen.
Councilmember Carter told Council the majority of money spent on transportation is not from
government sources. Rather, the costs are borne by citizens buying and maintaining the cars and
the buying of gas, oil and insurance. It comes primarily from the private sector, not public
government.
The feedback gleaned from this session gives Councilmember Carter enough to go to the
meetings with a general feeling from her constituents. She will continue attending.
(8:55 p.m.) Council President declared a 5- minute break. After the break, Mayor Rants will
conduct the Special Meeting to get those items out of the way before considering the continued
review of the 1999 budget and 1999 -2004 financial planning model.
(9:07 p.m.) Mayor Rants conducted the City Council Special meeting. (minutes provided
under separate cover)
(9:33 p.m.) Council President Linder reconvened the Council of Whole meeting.
City of Tukwila Page 10 of 12
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes November 23, 1998
Before handling item 5(0, Councilmember Duffle waived his report for the evening in exchange
for a small presentation regarding light rail.
Steve Lancaster reminded Council of a distribution of memorandum to Council regarding review
of the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for light rail and the schedule. The
memorandum provides what was discussed with the Transit Advisory Commission (TAC) with
regard to their involvement in the review of the draft EIS.
The EIS is scheduled to be issued on December 4, 1998, and the City has until February 5 to
prepare a formal response. The two month period sounds like a long time; however, the
document will be very thick and complex. The task will be large for staff, Advisory Commission
and the Council.
Proposed in the memorandum is a series of three meeting during January through December
where staff will present information to the Advisory Commission to receive feedback and
direction, in terms of issue importance and how the City should focus attention on same. That
will provide Council information in late January, 1999, with action to take place on February 1,
1999.
The TAC suggested inviting Councilmembers to attend their meetings on December 16, January
14, and January 20, 1999, at 5:30 p.m., in Conference Room #5, at the 6300 Southcenter
Building. In that way, when the TAC recommendation comes out, Council will have some
background to assist in their review.
Councilmember Fenton asked Mr. Lancaster to provide a follow -up notice in Council mailboxes.
Steve agreed to provide same.
Allan Ekberg. 4920 So. 161st St.. Tukwila. stated what he saw today from the Sound Transit
representatives is probably a tactic cities will see more and more frequently. They will play time
against the City by stating they have not had time to evaluate and do their own process diligently.
Due diligence on the part of the City would be for Council to attend the TAC meetings in order
to work collectively.
Steve Lancaster confirmed Councilmember Carter's belief that what is contained in a draft EIS is
not cast in stone and modifications are allowed. That is the central purpose for a draft EIS to
allow for changes.
Mr. Ekberg said the Sound Transit Board is being presented a 200 or 300 page Executive
Summary of this huge picture. There is much literature to read; not to mention the appendices
which are also included (another 400 -500 pages). Councilmember Carter noted that items such
as aerial photos speak louder than written words on a piece of paper and are generally very
useful.
Councilmember Haggerton stated his belief that Sound Transit just wants to build something
because they have the money. Quality is a concern to him.
City of Tukwila Page 11 of 12
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes November 23, 1998
It was agreed that as much as Council may dislike the tight timeline, it is necessary.
Council President Linder began the continued review of the proposed 1999 budget and CIP.
Review began on page 68 and went through page 157. There was discussion by and between
Council and Finance Director Alan Doerschel during the review. Items discussed were for
Councils' clarification.
Mr. Doerschel then noted several necessary changes of which Council is unaware. Those
changes include (in the general fund) will include cash replenishment of the reserve fund monies
used to purchase the 6300 Southcenter Building. There is also a $5,000.00 grant coming in
addition to a $5,000.00 carryover to be used for art purposes. One new expense is $32,000.00 for
the video arraignment equipment. $600,000.00 will carryover due to the fact the City cannot
complete the undergrounding on 44th. The City will not obtain the firetruck this year; thus we
will not make a downpayment, so that, too, will carry over.
REPORTS:
f. Continued review of 1999 Budget and 1999 -2004 Financial Planning Mode /CIP
a. Mayor
Mayor Rants advised the Council of a meeting of the King County Council on sewage system
expansion plans. The Committee members voted the funding plan to update a sewage system
would make growth pay for growth. The meeting is scheduled on Wednesday, December 2,
1998, at 7:00 p.m., at the Carco Theater.
Next, he told Council of his meeting with the BNSF Yard Manager, and Assistant Manager, in
addition to an engineer and attorney. They discussed the safety of the yard and hitting of houses.
The BNSF representatives told Mayor Rants they would install bulkheads across the back of the
ramp so no more trucks can roll down and hit the homes. Furthermore, he referred to
correspondence sent in 1997, wherein a date certain would be set to take the trucks off of 124th.
He relayed Council was disturbed about the accidents and had budgeted money for an
intersection on Airport Way a temporary access until something permanent may be put in
place.
Ross Earnst agreed the representatives will work with the City; however, they do not know if
they could make it work in the short time that is left as outlined in the correspondence. There
was confusion on the part of BNSF officials who believed the letter was written in 1998, as
opposed to 1997. BNSF would like to see what we design and perhaps provide some input.
A consultant is working for the City this week to determine costs and a potential plan. The
Mayor reports we could go to construction by January 1, 1999, and be completed by March,
1999. The City will not close 124th until the proposed intersection is completed.
City of Tukwila Page 12 of 12
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes November 23, 1998
Finally, the City will meet with the officials again. It was indicated BNSF wants the City's help
in rezoning property along the Burlington yard because they want to expand to the west. Mayor
Rants then brought to their attention a recent Court of Appeals decision which states, in part, that
BNSF has the right, without approval from a city, to condemn property. That is the only way
they would be able to expand due to the fact Tukwila will not support zoning changes in that
area. BNSF officials stated they do not use that tactic in Tukwila or anywhere else in the United
States.
More information and action is sure to follow on this item.
REPORTS:
Council agreed to dispense with reports.
ADJOURNMENT:
Moved by Duffle; seconded by Fenton to adjourn the meeting. The motion carried 7 -0.
Pamela Linder, Council President
Rth-W 8o
Robert H. Baker, CMC, Deputy City Clerk
Date Minutes Approved: 12, ig 198