Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit D04-421 - PITZER CONSTRUCTION - LOT 1PITZER CONSTRUCTION LOT 1 4837 S 150 ST D04 -421 Parcel No.: 0042000401 Address: 4837 S 150 ST TUKW Suite No: Tenant: Name: Address: Owner: Name: Address: Contact Person: Name: JOHN TAMUBRELLI City 0. Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: ci.tukwila.wa.us PITZER CONSTRUCTION - LOT #1 4837 S 150 ST, TUKWILA WA MALDONADO GUILLERMO 44TH, AUBURN WA 98001 Contractor: Name: PITZER HOMES INC Address: 46533 84 AV SE, ENUMCLAW WA Contractor License No: PITZEHI978Q4 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Address: 1201 MONSTER RD SW, STE 230, RENTON WA Permit Number: Issue Date: Permit Expires On: Expiration Date: 11/24/2007 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director D04 -421 01/11/2006 07/10/2006 Phone: Phone: 425 228 -5959 EXT 226 Phone: 253- 632 -9159 DESCRIPTION OF WORK: NEW 2103 SF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH ATTACHED 409 SF GARAGE AND 120 SF DECK. INCIDENTAL GRADING FOR FOUNDATION, DRIVEWAY, WALKS AND A DECK WD125 and ValVue Sewer. Roof downspouts to dispersion trench, access, grading, erosion prevention and sediment control. Cut in S 150th St for sanitary sewer estimated as 855 SF (171' X 5'). Pavement restoration and traffic control. Value of Construction: $181,412.39 Type of Fire Protection: N/A Type of Construction: VB Public Works Activities: Channelization / Striping: N Curb Cut / Access / Sidewalk / CSS: N Fire Loop Hydrant: Flood Control Zone: Hauling: Land Altering: Landscape Irrigation: Moving Oversize Load: Sanitary Side Sewer: Sewer Main Extension: Storm Drainage: doc: IBC - Permit N N N Y N N N N Y Fees Collected: $12,560.25 International Building Code Edition: 2003 Occupancy per IBC: 22 Number: 0 Size (Inches): 0 Start Time: End Time: Volumes: Cut 250 c.y. Fill 50 c.y. Start Time: End Time: Private: D04 -421 Public: Printed: 01 -11 -2006 z Z • w 6U O 0 w H CO w 0 Q i w Z = 1— 0 z H U.1 • w U� O N o ff L1.1 uj O z U 0~ z Street Use: Water Main Extension: Water Meter: doc: IBC - Permit Cit y o Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: ci.tukwila.wa.us Y Profit: N N N Private: * *continued on next page ** D04 -421 Non - Profit: N Public: Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Printed: 01 -11 -2006 Permit Center Authorized Signature: ordinances governing this work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. doc: IBC - Permit Cit y o Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206- 431 -3665 Web site: ci.tukwila.wa.us " 4 D04 -421 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Permit Number: D04 -421 Issue Date: 01/11/2006 Permit Expires On: 07/10/2006 Date: 0 I ( ' OLP I hereby certify that I have read and 4mine his permit and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of law and The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local laws regulating c• truction or the performance of work. I am authorized t• sign and obtain this development permit. - •Z 4 Date: /l Signature: �/.�/ , i, / /' Print Name: DIP /yI ?/:Or/2.— 5,b This permit shall become null and void if the work is not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance, or if the work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days from the last inspection. Printed: 01 -11 -2006 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 PERMIT CONDITIONS Parcel No.: 0042000401 Permit Number: X04 -421 Address: 4837 S 150 ST TUKW Status: ISSUED Suite No: Applied Date: 11/23/2004 Tenant: PITZER CONSTRUCTION - LOT #1 Issue Date: 01/11/2006 1: ** *BUILDING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS * ** 2: No changes shall be made to the approved plans unless approved by the design professional in responsible charge and the Building Official. 3: All mechanical work shall be inspected and approved under a separate permit issued by the City of Tukwila Permit Center (206/431- 3670). 4: All permits, inspection records, and approved plans shall be at the job site and available to the inspectors prior to start of any construction. These documents shall be maintained and made available until final inspection approval is granted. 5: Truss shop drawings shall be provided with the shipment of trusses delivered to the job site. Truss shop drawings shall bear the seal and signature of a Washington State Professional Engineer. Shop drawings shall be maintained on the site and available to the building inspector for inspection purposes. 6: All construction shall be done in conformance with the approved plans and the requirements of the International Building Code or International Residential Code, International Mechanical Code, Washington State Energy Code. 7: Notify the City of Tukwila Building Division prior to placing any concrete. This procedure is in addition to any requirements for special inspection. 8: All wood to remain in placed concrete shall be treated wood. 9: There shall be no occupancy of a building until final inspection has been completed and approved by Tukwila building inspector. No exception. 10: Manufacturers installation instructions shall be available on the job site at the time of inspection. 11: All construction noise to be in compliance with Chapter 8.22 of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code. A copy can be obtained at City Hall in the office of the City Clerk. 12: Ventilation is required for all new rooms and spaces of new or existing buildings and shall be in conformance with the International Building Code and the Washington State Ventilation and Indoor Air Quality Code. 13: Except for direct -vent appliances that obtain all combustion air directly from the outdoors; fuel-fired appliances shall not be located in, or obtain combustion air from, any of the following rooms or spaces: Sleeping rooms, bathrooms, toilet rooms, storage closets, surgical rooms. 14: Equipment and appliances having an ignition source and located in hazardous locations and public garages, PRIVATE GARAGES, repair garages, automotive motor -fuel dispensing facilities and parking garages shall be elevated such that the source of ignition is not less than 18 inches above the floor surface on which the equipment or appliance rests. 15: Water heaters shall be anchored or strapped to resist horizontal displacement due to earthquake motion. Strapping shall doc: Conditions D04 -421 S'^arrtl�W;a+e.rwpt+! Printed: 01 -11 -2006 z • z w 6 j O O 0 co ca Ili I w 0 2 gQ co = d F _w z = • F- 0 w O — O F– w W u O .. z w 0 z City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 be at points within the upper one -third and lower one -third of the water heater's vertical dimension. A minimum distance of 4- inches shall be maintained above the controls with the strapping. 16: All plumbing and gas piping work shall be inspected and approved under a separate permit issued by the Department of Public Health - Seattle and King County (206/296- 4932). 17: All electrical work shall be inspected and approved under a separate permit issued by the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (206/248- 6630). 18: VALIDITY OF PERMIT: The issuance or granting of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of the building code or of any other ordinances of the City of Tukwila. Permits presuming to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of the code or other ordinances of the City of Tukwila shall not be valid. The issuance of a permit based on construction documents and other data shall not prevent the Building Official from requiring the correction of errors in the construction documents and other data. 19: ** *PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS * ** 20: The applicant must notify the City Utility Inspector at (206)433 -0179 upon commencement and completion of work at least 24 hours in advance. All inspection requests for utility work must also be made 24 hours in advance. 21: Work affecting traffic flows shall be closely coordinated with the City Utilities Inspector. Traffic Control Plans shall be submitted to the Inspector for prior approval. 22: The City of Tukwila has an undergrounding ordinance requiring the power, telecommunications, and cable service lines be underground from the point of connection on the pole to the house. 23: Flagging, signing and coning shall be in accordance with MUTCD for Traffic Control. Contractor shall provide certified flagmen for traffic control. Sweep or otherwise clean streets to the satisfaction of Public Works each night around hauling route (No flushing allowed). Notify City Inspector before 12:00 Noon on Friday preceding any weekend work. 24: Any material spilled onto any street shall be cleaned up immediately. 25: Temporary erosion control measures shall be implemented as the first order of business to prevent sedimentation off -site or into existing drainage facilities. 26: The site shall have permanent erosion control measures in place as soon as possible after final grading has been completed and prior to the Final Inspection. 27: From October 1 through April 30, cover any slopes and stockpiles that are 3H:1V or steeper and have a vertical rise of 10 feet or more and will be unworked for greater than 12 hours. During this time period, cover or mulch other disturbed areas, if they will be unworked more than 2 days. Covered material must be stockpiled on site at the beginning of this period. Inspect and maintain this stabilization weekly and immediately before, during and following storms. 28: Pavement restoration shall meet Public Works' standard. 29: The driveway shall be designed and sloped so that drainage from the driveway flows away from the house and garage. 30: ** *FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS*** 31: The attached set of building plans have been reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau and are acceptable with the following concerns: 32: For short plat development (four single family homes or less), hydrants shall be placed so that a hydrant is within 250 doc: Conditions 004 -421 Printed: 01 -11 -2006 L.'i';3 �'S. �: �t�uw ?.wY;.;:(;�.'�: «7.]�dir w...:c.: ;... �.._. .......:�.��;...:.:,a+: ✓�z��:�r z _I- ' .J U 00 � LL w 2 u_ Q i z = 1- 0 Z F— w ON 0H ww Hr- U- O ..z w U= 0H z City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 feet of a building. Distance from a hydrant to a building is measured along the path of vehicular travel. (City Ordinance #2052) 33: All required hydrants and surface access roads shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction. (IFC 503.1, 508.1) 34: Your street address must be conspicuously posted on the building and shall be plainly visible and legible from the street. Numbers shall contrast with their background. (IFC 505.1) 35: Any overlooked hazardous condition and /or violation of the adopted Fire or Building Codes does not imply approval of such condition or violation. 36: These plans were reviewed by Inspector 511. If you have any questions, please call Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau at (206)575 -4407. 37: ** *PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS * ** 38: * ** TREE PROTECTION * ** 39: A four foot tall, stable, tree protection fence shall be installed 15 -feet from the 30 -inch maple tree. No construction activity is to occur beyond the fence including grading (fill too), storage of materials, parking of vehicles and machinery, dumping of chemicals or washing of any equipment. 40: The ivy and other invasive plants within the tree protection area must be removed. The removal of the ivy and invasive plants must be done by hand. 41: Along the south edge of the house, first excavate by hand to see if roots are encountered. Heavy machinery is not to be used to pull soil away from the root system of the tree. 42: Should tree roots be exposed during excavation, cleanly cut the roots to soil line using sharp pruners or handsaw. If roots are exposed during dry weather, immediately cover them with soil or wet burlap to avoid dessication. 43: The arborist who prepared the tree report must be on site during the excavation of the foundation along the south side of the house to ensure that the recommended tree protetion measures are followed. After the excavation is complete, the arborist shall submit a report to the Department of Community Development detailing the excavation that was done and any impacts on the tree. 44: * ** WETLAND PROTECTION * ** 45: Prior to final inspection of the house, the applicant shall record with the King County Auditor's Office a Notice of Sensitive Area. The purpose of the Notice is to inform future property owners of the presense of the wetland and its associated buffer. The Notice shall include language that the City shall provide, the legal description of the property (provided by the applicant), and a site map (provided by the applicant) showing the property, the wetland, and the buffer. All documents must meet King County Recording requirements. In lieu of providing the easement the applicant may construct a three -foot tall split rail fence with signage, which notes the presense of the wetland and its buffer. doc: Conditions * *continued on next page ** D04 -421 Printed: 01 -11 -2006 Signature: Print Name: doc: Conditions r City of Tukwila h,/f/0 44 Tl7.2�2 3k ( P4S;Oev67 D04 -421 Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 I hereby certify that I have read these conditions and will comply with them as outlined. All provisions governing this work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provision of any regulating construction or the performance of work. Date: of law and ordinances other work or local laws Printed: 01 -11 -2006 gl w re 11 4 O 0 co o. co Ill -i i-- � LL w O 2 LL d = W I— I ? 11—O Z I uj U O N O I-- Ili W H H � O iii 0 ~ z CITY OF TUKWILA Community Development Department Public Works Department Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 SITE LOCATION Site Address: gg3 + 54, / s ' Tenant Name: T / 7Z-e? C6 S4. — 40t l Property Owners Name: M I (O �t CI() 6 W.� I /, /t tv) Mailing Address: f' / e l/ 41'11" 0 V-4. . CONTACT PERSON E -Mail Address: J6G n ' 1")1 Company Name: 7 Izevz- S / ate Mailing Address: /7Z0 . f Skeet Ss E gg .c^ Contact Person: • E -Mail Address: P� A W . Z 13 . ` Z f A '`► �1 " > , • �" ,r Company Name: l),5 //4 // I , hG Mailing Address: / 96' 3 F3 a Ve- 6o. S/e P Contact Person: E,/ertv\ Company Name: f le c\ - c; -i i \applications\pennit application (7 -2004) Applications and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. Applications will(not)be accepted through the(mail or bytfax.,' * *Please Print ** %t v t 1.• Mailing Address: Contact Person: /"'h'' ., ' E -Mail Address: Paee 1 W TUKWILA W Building Permit No. j)65 Mechanical Permit No. /0 116 Public Works Permit No. Project No. (For office use only) King Co Assessor's Tax No.: 001/Z000 ' y0 / Suite Number: Floor: New Tenant: ❑ Yes ❑ .. No a G} �VIti h City State Q j y� '. 7 F Zip Name: I+i 64.04) 1; /t i a t' a 1/ I's ea e:5 4.4 Day Telephone ZS") ZS" S"9 $9 e,?' 226 Mailing Address: /20/ /1 "nS/e e, •ed. 5 t) S/E 32o. We") r'?, tot, At 9I City yy State Zip Fax Number/ .l' GENERAL CONTRACTOR INFORMATION - (Mechanical Contractor information on back page) C7 +� v /cr City State Zip Day Telephone. r 53 7 3 3 3 7 2- 0 loo/ Fax Number: (Z 5 3 z 7 2 Contractor Registration Number: ! "+ 71w ` CC- 99 3 e fD Expiration Date: • -` S * *An original or notarized copy of current Washington State Contractor License must be presented at the time of permit issuance ** ARCHITECT OF RECORD - All plans must be wet stamped by Architect of Record City State Zip Day Telephone: s- ` • / c7 E -Mail Address: Fax Number: ENGINEER OF RECORD - All plans must be wet stamped by Engineer of Record City - State Zip Day Telephone: ' `=> ./ Y-° "' ' - Fax Number: 1 • BUILDING PERMIT INFORMATION - 206 -431 -3670 Valuation of Project (contractor's bid price): $ / S 0 X72 Existing Building Valuation: $ Scope of Work (please provide detailed information): Q V\e(� 'j % -vi �i )e �'ra ►M 12e1 ate e-8 t.•.1' 4-k 55�� 1 r o C t' c-f �1 \, 1 6 4-A L�. � rt 4—r)t ) ' e e ' c ) -' , A € t '^/ et. �.i C , t.? , V�a 1 V : 'd.,. d_ .e'c ..,._ Will there be new rack storage? ❑ .. Yes If "yes ", see Handout No. for requirements. Provide All Building Areas in Square Footage Below PLANNING DIVISION: Single - family building footprint (area of the foundation of all structures, plus any decks over 18 inches and overhangs greater than 18 inches) *For an Accessory dwelling, provide the following: Lot Area (sq ft): 5/, 363 Floor area of principal dwelling: 003 Floor area for accessory dwelling: *Provide documentation that shows that the principal owner lives in one of the dwellings as his or her primary residence. Number of Parking Stalls Provided: Standard: ' Compact: / / Handicap: Will there be a change in use? ❑ Yes El .. No If "yes ", explain: ►�AGan 1< G TL /N /v✓ .57+ /e FIRE PROTECTION /HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: ❑...Sprinklers ❑...Automatic Fire Alarm o None ❑...Other (specify) Will there be storage or use of flammable, combustible or hazardous materials in the building? ❑ ...Yes ❑ ...No If `yes", attach list of materials and storage locations on a separate 8 -1/2 x 11 paper indicating quantities and Material Safety Data Sheets. tapplicationstpermit application (7.2004) Pace 2 Z W QQ � JU t3 0 N O CO LLJ J = CO LL WO 2 J W I- I - W !- _ Z � H Z I– W D • O U O — � 1- W W H 16 0 . Z W U =• 0 Z .a:J'.4vu.:+i'+wi >wtY.`:vi.! . • iaF'.. lF..+ iui. icr. aa' i1Cii'l A�A1: C' uii✓` �k7�:N'to.i'+Gft3;.a�u.'.tl'u�� � "`. .�tiiXJ1L' �71Fft, ti.: t• k!`L+ iCsfei .:{:.l+Jilika}:M`a%3nih+x: Existing Interior Remodel Addition to Existing Structure New Type of Construction per IBC Type of Occupancy per IBC 1' Floor _ , 3 J z 1./6 -, i e.- 2n Floor 3r Floor l 1 t Floors thru Basement _ -7 7 Accessory Structure* Attached Garage 1–/ O CJ / Detached Garage Attached Carport 1 Detached Carport Covered Deck Uncovered Deck / Z 1 • BUILDING PERMIT INFORMATION - 206 -431 -3670 Valuation of Project (contractor's bid price): $ / S 0 X72 Existing Building Valuation: $ Scope of Work (please provide detailed information): Q V\e(� 'j % -vi �i )e �'ra ►M 12e1 ate e-8 t.•.1' 4-k 55�� 1 r o C t' c-f �1 \, 1 6 4-A L�. � rt 4—r)t ) ' e e ' c ) -' , A € t '^/ et. �.i C , t.? , V�a 1 V : 'd.,. d_ .e'c ..,._ Will there be new rack storage? ❑ .. Yes If "yes ", see Handout No. for requirements. Provide All Building Areas in Square Footage Below PLANNING DIVISION: Single - family building footprint (area of the foundation of all structures, plus any decks over 18 inches and overhangs greater than 18 inches) *For an Accessory dwelling, provide the following: Lot Area (sq ft): 5/, 363 Floor area of principal dwelling: 003 Floor area for accessory dwelling: *Provide documentation that shows that the principal owner lives in one of the dwellings as his or her primary residence. Number of Parking Stalls Provided: Standard: ' Compact: / / Handicap: Will there be a change in use? ❑ Yes El .. No If "yes ", explain: ►�AGan 1< G TL /N /v✓ .57+ /e FIRE PROTECTION /HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: ❑...Sprinklers ❑...Automatic Fire Alarm o None ❑...Other (specify) Will there be storage or use of flammable, combustible or hazardous materials in the building? ❑ ...Yes ❑ ...No If `yes", attach list of materials and storage locations on a separate 8 -1/2 x 11 paper indicating quantities and Material Safety Data Sheets. tapplicationstpermit application (7.2004) Pace 2 Z W QQ � JU t3 0 N O CO LLJ J = CO LL WO 2 J W I- I - W !- _ Z � H Z I– W D • O U O — � 1- W W H 16 0 . Z W U =• 0 Z .a:J'.4vu.:+i'+wi >wtY.`:vi.! . • iaF'.. lF..+ iui. icr. aa' i1Cii'l A�A1: C' uii✓` �k7�:N'to.i'+Gft3;.a�u.'.tl'u�� � "`. .�tiiXJ1L' �71Fft, ti.: t• k!`L+ iCsfei .:{:.l+Jilika}:M`a%3nih+x: We PUBLIC WORKS PERMIT INFORMATION — 206 -433 -0179 Scope of Work (please provide detailed information): POW X7 /; )/ 1/t/O V //✓i' // ez h dtrL rt��c PP/ M/ 6f / ,P f- eieele /, 1 / P ig d,"g-; Water District ❑ ...Tukwila ❑ ...Water Availability Provide Please refer to Public Works B ulletin #1 for fees and estimate sheet. Sewer District ❑ ...Tukwila ValVue 0... Renton ❑ ... Seattle ❑ ... Sewer Use Certificate . .. Sewer Availability Provided 0... Approved Septic Plans Provided ❑ ...Septic System - For onsite septic system, provide 2 copies of a current septic design approval by King County Health Department. Submitted with Application (mark boxes which apply): Civil Plans (Maximum Paper Size -22" x 34 ") ❑ ...Technical Information Report (Storm Drainage) ❑ ...Bond ❑ ...Insurance 0 ...Easement(s) Proposed Activities (mark boxes that anplv): ❑ ... Right -of -way Use - Nonprofit for less than 72 hours 0 ...Right -of -wa Use - No Disturbance F EL : . - Right -o f - -way `I Non Right -of -way A ..Total Cut ( ...Total Fill 50 50 ❑ ... Sanitary Side Sewer ❑ ... Cap or Remove Utilities ❑ ... Frontage Improvements ❑...Traffic Control ❑ ... Backflow Prevention - Fire Protection Irrigation Domestic Water \applicationstpermit application (7.2004) ■ ... Water District # 125 cubic yards `yi ? cubic yards // 1 , „ „ „ ❑ ...Permanent Water Meter Size... ❑ ...Temporary Water Meter Size .. ❑ ...Water Only Meter Size ❑ ... Sewer Main Extension Public ❑ ...Water Main Extension Public Call before you Dig: 1 800 - 424 - 5555 .Abandon Septic Tank .Curb Cut .Pavement Cut .Looped Fire Line 1, „ WO# WO# WO# Private Private 0... Highline �.. Geotechnical Report ❑ ...Traffic Impact Analysis O ... Maintenance Agreement(s) ❑ ...Hold Harmless O ... Right -of -way Use - Profit for less than 72 hours 0... Right-o f -way Use — Potential Disturbance ❑... Work in Flood Zone ❑... Storm Drainage ❑ ...Renton ❑ ...Grease Interceptor ❑ ...Channelization ❑ ...Trench Excavation ❑ ...Utility Undergrounding ❑ ...Deduct Water Meter Size FINANCE INFORMATION Fire Line Size at Property Line ...Water (,...Sewer Monthly Service Billing to: o: Name: P(Tza12- C �Y! S,/�� hey C. r ,�� Mailing Address: /oZa Sfte'e'%y Water Met .Refund /Billing: Name: ! 1 ? ,et. O t+^ ,� it �r� P7-7 g Address: Mailing 02.E ,, � {�` l Number of Public Fire Hydrant(s) ❑ ... Sewage Treatment Day Telephone:(? �? ? . -7 J 43 C ?ubi„t kVR- 9/ a 1 City State Zip Day Telephone:' ' �r../ :J V tCv'< (Al /.- City _3 3 3- - ?2 t9 State Page 3 z i w J U. 0 N J � CO W 1L -± H = Z1.- 1- 0 Z • W U (3 O — i0 1- W UJ 0 r__ 0 w Z = : 0 I— Z Unit Type: Qty Unit Type: Qty Unit Type: Qty Boiler /Compressor: Qty Furnace <I00K BTU Air Handling Unit >10,000 CFM Fire Damper 0 -3 HP /100,000 BTU Furnace >100K BTU Evaporator Cooler Diffuser 3 -15 HP /500,000 BTU Floor Furnace Ventilation Fan Thermostat 1 15 -30 HP /1,000,000 BTU Suspended/Wall/Floor Mounted Heater Ventilation System Wood /Gas Stove 30 -50 HP /1,750,000 BTU Appliance Vent Hood 4 Water Heater 50+ HP/1,750,000 BTU Heat/Refrig /Cooling System Incinerator - Domestic Emergency Generator Air Handling Unit <10,000 CFM Incinerator — Comm/Ind Other Mechanical Equipment MECHANICAL PERMIT INFORMATION — 206 -431 -3670 I MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR INFORMATION Company Name: Mailing Address: City State Zip Contact Person: Day Telephone: E -Mail Address: Fax Number: Contractor Registration Number: Expiration Date: * *An original or notarized copy of current Washington State Contractor License must be presented at the time of permit issuance ** Valuation of Project (contractor's bid price): $ 7 � — Scope of Work (please provide detailed information): ) t.( (' 1 S )1 SD ''o L. Ft' PP // �►� mot- Use: Residential: New El ., Replacement ❑ Commercial: New EL Replacement ❑ Fuel Type: Electric ❑ Gas Y Other: Indicate type of mechanical work being installed and the quantity below: PERMIT APPLICATION NOTES — Applicable to all permits in this application Value of Construction — In all cases, a value of construction amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be reviewed and is subject to possible revision by the Permit Center to comply with current fee schedules. Expiration of Plan Review— Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitation. The Building Official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the applicant as defined in Section 107.4 of the Uniform Building Code (current edition). No application shall be extended more than once. I HEREBY CERTIFY THA I HAVE READ AND ,E ? MINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY,IlY HE LAWS 9/THE1ST 'TE OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. ORIZED BUILDIN O 12 // K�GE Signature: 4 .. 2,1 '; Print Na ■applicationstpertnit application (7.2004) Day Telephone:( MailinS/':dress: I2d\ may ) &) A. L.33 3;'e-) ee v � ra r� City Pace 4 < I / Date: 31 V.-Mr State Zip Date Application Accepted: Date Application Expires: F j 0 ?3' Staff Initials: Payee: ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Description Current Pmts City of Tukwila TRANSACTION LIST: Type Method Amount doc: Receipt 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 Z RECEIPT 0_ W Parcel No.: 0042000401 Permit Number: D04 -421 _1 o . Address: 4837 S 150 ST TUKW Status: ISSUED 0 0 Suite No: Applied Date: 11/23/2004 N W Applicant: PITZER CONSTRUCTION - LOT #1 Issue Date: 01/1112006 -J H O u. W O Receipt No.: R06 -01324 Payment Amount: 58.00 u- Q w d. Initials: JEM Payment Date: 08/22/2006 04:37 PM = W User ID: 1165 Balance: $0.00 H = Z I.. ' I— O Zii— • W U 0 O — O I— W ui H- U . 9 Z Payment Check 2305 58.00 U N . 0 PITZER HOMES, INC. PLAN CHECK - RES Description Account Code 000/345.830 58.00 Total: 58.00 8949 08/23 9716 TOTAL 116.00 Printed: 08 -22 -2006 Z ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Description Current Pmts doc: Receipt City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 Parcel No.: 0042000401 Permit Number: D04 -421 Address: 4837 S 150 ST TUKW Status: ISSUED Suite No: Applied Date: 11/23/2004 Applicant: PITZER CONSTRUCTION - LOT #1 Issue Date: 01/11/2006 Receipt No.: R06 -01291 Payment Amount: 4,500.00 Initials: LAW Payment Date: 08/17/2006 04:51 PM User ID: 1632 Balance: $0.00 Payee: PITZER HOMES INC TRANSACTION LIST: Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 2300 4,500.00 BONDS /DEPOSITS RECEIPT Account Code 000/386.908 4,500.00 Total: 4,500.00 8791 08/18 9710 TOTAL 4500.00 Printed: 08 -17 -2006 Z Q 1Z ; W QQ � JU 0 NO CO la J = H Li. w O g Q = W t - z F-O Z W C.) O — O N • u 0 W U= O - ~' Z Parcel No.: Address: Suite No: Applicant: Receipt No.: Initials: User ID: Payee: City of Tukwila 0042000401 4837 S 150 ST TUKW R06 -01256 JEM 1165 PITZER HOMES, INC. TRANSACTION LIST: Type Method Amount Payment ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Description Current Pmts doc: Receipt 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 PITZER CONSTRUCTION - LOT #1 Check 2290 PW ADDL PERMIT /INSP FEE Description RECEIPT Account Code 000/342.400 Permit Number: Status: Applied Date: Issue Date: D04 -421 ISSUED 11/23/2004 01/11/2006 Payment Amount: 168.75 Payment Date: 08/14/2006 04:12 PM Balance: $0.00 168.75 168.75 Total: 168.75 8645 08/15 9716 • TOTAL 168.75 Printed: °08 -14 -2006 Payee: ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Description Current Pmts City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 Parcel No.: 0042000401 Permit Number: D04 -421 Address: 4837 S 150 ST TUKW Status: ISSUED Suite No: Applied Date: 11/23/2004 Applicant: PITZER CONSTRUCTION - LOT #1 Issue Date: 01/11/2006 Receipt No.: R06 -00674 Payment Amount: 58.00 Initials: LAW Payment Date: 05/17/2006 10:18 AM User ID: 1630 Balance: $0.00 PITZER HOMES INC TRANSACTION LIST: Type Method Description Amount Payment Check 2195 58.00 BUILDING INVESTIGATION RECEIPT Account Code 000/322.800 58.00 Total: 58.00 5.73 05/1? 9'716 TOTAL 58.00 doc: Receipt Printed: 05 -17 -2006 z = r4 w U O' N 0 W= -J H. W O- g Q � d I— Ili Z = I— O w H-. : p • N. .0 H - . WW O. W Z = O z Parcel No.: Address: Suite No: Applicant: Receipt No.: R04 -01573 Initials: SKS User ID: 1165 Payee: ACCOUNT ITEM LIST: Description doc: Receipt City of Tukwila TRANSACTION LIST: Type Method 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 0042000401 PITZER CONSTRUCTION - LOT #1 PITZER HOMES, INC. Payment Check 1045 PLAN CHECK - RES PW BASE APPLICATION FEE PW LAND ALT PLAN REVIEW PW PLAN REVIEW Description RECEIPT Account Code 000/345.830 000/322.100 000/345.830 000/345.830 Permit Number: Status: Applied Date: Issue Date: Payment Amount: Payment Date: Balance: Amount 1,682.69 Current Pmts 1, 170.69 250.00 37.00 225.00 Total: 1,682.69 D04 -421 PENDING 11/23/2004 1,682.69 11/23/2004 11:46 AM $2,102.56 /24 971.3 Printed: 11 -23 -2004 COMMENTS: V / Ic.) 6 1444-el a-ykdf _xi\ to (!ixtA.ex ckeAlew- da dit4-c-Ac- A\ iz) a A 7/71- 6 rcALci ' eV/ VO 6 c Gtfilli■ Oi. r- A i . 1 - (4.• l'et) . 24 2! :_:. • , 9 1 11 0 q/IV 06 A,lit4U ("tAitg4A Date Wanted: / i ,/4 y Vo4 y Project: , l' Type of Inspection: II 5 Address: 2 g r , Au' )• Date Called: 7/ Special Instructi n : Date Wanted: / i ,/4 y Vo4 y a.m. P.m. (o: Phone ..."i44>i.aHi.Y.kil 4: 01 t; s'44`:q" ,c4 '4' "4'4: °Ic (a) '5k mu( INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431-3670 El Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. Inspector: Date: $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: I I- A _ z u4 6 -J 0 O 0 • w w • LL • o g • < 1 w z 0 z LU Lu (.) • — O I- 111 u j 0 0 P 0 I— COMMENTS: VO 6 s/o 7Y :0 L) e4<ti /:L /)drn►nt Si/1 9 4f C"dN(‘1ci:= .000 (4„,, f . (0Ntj),_ uivf 6/6 id ftG %7 (x sf ,e ( ,1 &1k s t pr //5/4 0 e r6i112 4Z a (o w,gy /f SOO kii‘i °1 44;1 S /& (All itiau.r Myfre -!cam. /I GC6. Ss I PLdh^ fix(57 / i /1( "CO 41T 041: 7D /_L eit ( -ur / 16 11 1 t ( � '�riy !rte 2 t /e / ;' w / ., ei►J r' a 6k v atw1-.) s ,i1 - 1 8k 1)/7` 4"r ✓ ' '. Z:u T /(L? ar/1 D4 /J /N /1 c- 2'4 7 &f\1 1)1z1 6 ■ 5r azaiL J f' ! (,Lt w1,1 CU, :pJ6 1l k75()14 / G/C ,fr a , i ( Project: Type of Inspection: Address: enr 5 - /1/4) /J \ Date Called: c7//0 / Special Instructions: Date Wanted: '7/5 �/0 a.m. p.m. Requester: 0/1-A) / P1 i ‹, Phone No: 253 (f 32 9/ ,9 (,) CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Inspector: Date: 9/5./0 ! INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. PERMIT NO. Approved per applicable codes. ❑ Corrections required prior to approval. $58.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: , ' Pr c IP 7 7, 071A54 e Type of Inspection: p/ii'q Address, 5' ,'37 S •/50 Date Called: Special Instructions: Date Wanted: a.m. 0 —.2 y{ —a cL Requester: Phone No: ...„._- INSPECTION RECORD 2� i Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. J Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 73f7P7 eet /09 ' rr:: ,,,�� J1 D ate:j [f 61-7 • 8.00 REINSPECTIO FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcen er Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: z • Z re al aa 7 J U U 0 CO W _ w 0 g Q = d u I-0 Z l— U 0 — O I-- W H � L I Z w co = O ~ z Project: Type of Inspection: \._, Address; 37 so / c _ `-, Date Called: Special Instructions: Date Wantegt....,/,9623 Re uester: Requester: No: • INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION "6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3 Approved per applicable codes. RI Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 7 12 1../r9, Inspector: cerfz O2/ o c..-c../t," r c.t >d de/2,74 1-7/) r Date: U $58. 0 REINSPECTION F REQUIkED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: z Z re W QQ � - I O 0 CO ❑ L _ co W O co ? d 1 W Z = ZO U � O N ❑ I— W Hrz 1 U = O ~. z COMMENTS: Type of Inspectio Address: 'T ', 7 3' ( 1 v J 17 0 / 1 1 3 - P • - AvZ Special Instructions: , Date Wanted: wic3 0‘ ,t,, ,)„,t_ v,,,,Lf { g et 0 io - R - k ar ,k.)( il^-k4 \ cA) u. (rut C / m 4?( v i .t. i22 Jai ci)(( XK- u.4 1?. (4U -• 1) Pro,,ggc Type of Inspectio Address: 'T ', 7 3' ( 1 v J 17 Date Called: Special Instructions: , Date Wanted: a.m. p.m. Requester: Phone No: (kiJ INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. r. El Corrections required prior to approval. Inspector: Date: (ji 8 -/ Oc E1 $58.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Pro ect: / P ,7 ` ,7Fi? �on/S? 1if7ld't/ Type of Inspection: F /4/4/ �J A ss. X8 37S i50,s� Date Called: Special Instructions: 47/77 ns PPss /% k, Date Wanted: / (a.m. Reques Phone No: c ,2 5 :z G -G y"� 5 INSPECTION RECORD 2 "3- -- Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 00y- e/4/ :PERMIT N (206)431 -36 0 COMMENTS: / lr } 4 `i-7 /./,, fr, /2 Inspector: Date Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. LI $58.00 RE INSPECTION FEFlREQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Z 2Z re J U 00 CO CO LU J CO u. W 2 gQ co = 1--W Z I— 0 W ~ • W U � O � O H WW • 0 L O .. Z W U= O ~ Z Project: F �-'''c Type of Inspection: i I' G l it;* �.. % , Address: Date Called: j Special Instructions: Date Wanted a , "'e‘ _-' Requester: Phone No: Y�:i?.ii1w. — � M+hf YZw"4.n:nf�."'Cf "..:41 .»A' y ^ w z. a= in:rtY . :.? :_ __.rr• "`:�:.c- 7,,^r^+w: rt.. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 4 t i 2 -A (206)431 -3 COMMENTS: • '1 5 S ..6.* 6 Ads d Date Approved per applicable codes. J Corrections required prior to approval. El $58 . oo FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: COMMENTS: Type of Inspection: S /is G 9 Co 0, pm l Vd Go-, 3 Address: 4837 S 150 St (1 . 10 ro ( r 1 6 UV/ S 06 o/ iy�(fr tv14-11 p_.K/1.1n4A7A-7L CiAl/y. Ri6:I;p I) i t r Urw�/ PA-A. /4 1M //-d Requester: D a h Phone No: 253- J 26 Project: V domes Type of Inspection: S �6� tr`r lL Address: 4837 S 150 St Date Calle S - 06 Special Instructions: Lo t # l�ca I Date Wanted: ,- g -15-o6 Requester: D a h Phone No: 253- J 26 El Approved per applicable codes. D -42l E1 $58.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. Inspector: Date: / 6 Receipt No.: Date: Project: Type of Inspection; 1 \l Address: / 1 4 7).1 .- C ICI) Date Called: Special Instructions: ( �4 00 CGtU !J4I 4tV k 'brie Date Wanted: � ^ p.m. a.m. Requester: DAVI T ,\ Phone No: 2e- (o 1 INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 - 6 0 COMMENTS: iWJ 5 c -0 - {t hm y yr't )ruk 5P9 toviri.V" f up(x Inspector: El Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. Date: lid ) V $58.00 I� EIN5PECTIO FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspen, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: z 1 z ce JU O 0 N D CO w J = CO IL w 0 u_� I I— W Z = H W p O • - O I— w - o U O .. z U= o z COMMENTS: I pi.,l?4 7 r �!Y.r 2_ c/ t:i.--t,, 4 wr /q, See-1 L ! 1 `r L.G, 1:7$ ,r 4 --/ Cea • ') />-, s-L4 / n (:..... „ ' f_ 6) (e? -c- /72 , 1 �h,�� , 'yr I6 / 4 '/ . / ft ie,zy s 1 -64 hIlil '71 / r'r_ e i S / h i,./ I, r�/..lt I — ';,/1 00 c eh -, 04.4 kg, /I )i. 4,, i ktro 4..or`lar 77 f Phone No: (253- «2.GG —G 9 s 5 n A Project: ll t % ? ?Psi (7on157 d 4 Type of Inspection: / //✓1/)9 / Address 1 /837 5• /50 s Date Called: Special Instructions: A4 F 9s ?OSs•1.0z.. /' Date Wanted: g- /5--06. a. p• : Requester: Phone No: (253- «2.GG —G 9 s 5 • Z / INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 D Approved per applicable codes. .1 4/2 P ER is (206)431 -36 14 Corrections required prior to approval. Date: ri $58.00 tE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: I Date: COMMENTS: r Cons `i5 Y 06 ObAndb (/Z4A (n! , -` s e" /5 t LYt/ c19/6-7 al-- .—P' � A41, .. D G/; /AI ,/A/ r- /) L( v�' Si d ,: 7 Gv.� / Ay e fdf//l p., /7A57" e. A . . 1r/ '/i47- 5, f( ti ()A\ &u/ b;5` /A ""- (6. 1' 5(4 /t' 4i v i 5 i o )-- 2 ,e U M, 'r..J `' 14/0916 If A-1, ' P/€10 6 Akr :/40 F) I- PA /i, f/U7 y Project: r Cons Type of Inspection: Davin 5th L A I S D Address: 4837 5 150 St Date Called: / a- 3-06 Lot Special Instructions: # Date Wanted: a.m. Requester: . esse R -1 Phone No: 253-255-89/4 • INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)43 1 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. _Corrections required prior to approval. Inspector: Date: te/ El $58.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: 'Date: Prod e / � { 7 C /C7 Type of Ins ection: _ . /you /(3' // 1:: Pt1 I Address 4' S /50 � .7/ ��'' Date Called: / 7 / 7. Special Instructions: Date Wanted: 7a.m.' p.m. Requester: Phone No: If f ;Xi: �.�" ) a0 ' Kitl:i INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 J t Do V- 92/ (206)431 -3 Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: f PrCL. ' (J r /ft(/((.6.' - � � 1 .- - /A4speolh>h) nspectt r: .00 REINSPECTIONgEE. REQUIRE jI Prior to inspection,-fee must be id at 6300 Southcent r Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date 7� Date: 2 1Z W r QQ � J U CO . N o W W W I W O gn u_ • d = H Z �. ZI W U c O — O I— WW H 0 W Z co U — Z Pr ect: 6,1/S71 Type of Inspection: u ( 7 /246.4J/ 5,A94c - Addre : Ve3 32S /,�v$7 Date Called: Special Instructions: Date Wanted: �s- a.m. 7— / d� �p Requester: Phone No: o 35 -2 S 5 - - G,/ l�1 INSPECTION NO. `proved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 El Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: AloTv, (ro1~-kitg iUdq Oo / ti 7-6 Lep - 1 A / 1,�gc o .Lt heak -tV Pr r;nJell Inspe Date / 7_66 8.00 REINSPECTION FE REQUIRED. Pdor to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter lvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Z 1 Z W J U 00 N O J WO CO u_d I F. W Z W � Q C.) O — O I— Ww =o W Z H H O Z Prokct: _ (i'ititS T. Type of Inspection: c ,5 • t. I /7 2F12 Address: 1 / g 5 / 5 0 s7_ Date Called: Special Instructions: Date Wanted: -- / 2- ‘)G a.m. P. Requester: Ph onejsyg: Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTIOTI NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 $ 02 4 1/— 92/ (206)431-36 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 5 (71-1 / (4 601 .e441h I — 4%/-e-V 6.0-/ ic 49) ( El (00 REINSPEETION FE4 REQUIRED. 'or to inspection, fee must be id at 6300 Southcenter lvd., Suite 00. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: z I z 6 o • o co 0 co w W I • L W O 2 g • •zt (0 3 1— ' Z 1— 0 Z 1— Ill ill C.) 0 — C1 F- 111 0 r _- 0 ai co ▪ "±- 0 I— z - • •-•-•-• , Prod ct: /r .2�2 � v)vs 7 Type of Inspection: � .4 /i -' _ . ,vs r,i4a Addr ss: X8 /so 57' Date Called: Special Instructions: Date Wanted: _7 -- / 7- a 6 a.m. p.m. Requester: Phone No: INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION N CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 f4 Approved per applicable codes. J Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 5 e rC q EX 7 Date: ?-.-J7 46 x$ 58.00 REINSPECTIOJI FEE REQUIRED. rior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 00. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Project: A " f-7--t Type of Inspection: ��}, // ! 1..4 '1� la 4r Ai Address 37 % /` _ l Date Called: Speci Instructions: c2; 26g3-40/ Date Wanted: 7 --�6 a.m. Requester: Phone No: INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. 0 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: ri $58.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be . " paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: `Date: Z Z W QQ • � J U O N CO J F-- w o • r u_ ? = W Z f - Z O • W U� O — co 0 1— W W w z Z COMMENTS: ) Ne / ,e1 4 / S Ad.., 6,0€474 ? frva, / c. 42 Date Called: r ...........-;/-4_ Date Wanted: - 0 e /. ...4.,..4•:...." - 2..,..) (01-7.4 S ey / • (i-x) • 7" ei e- • / 6/ 7 ‹. JA , --) /2," . ,-.i., A .1).. )- cil/ j A 1 Project: i ir jr"--t-it Type of Inspection: Zrfe9 (7..e.",... Address 4417 St, Date Called: Special Instructions: Date Wanted: 7 prm: Requester: Phone No: kts,i4 t; 1 INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 El Approved per applicable codes. Inspector: et AO INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit PER LI T Date: /6224/.-- 206)431 -36 El Corrections required prior to approval. 17 $58.00 REINSPECTION F E REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: 'Date: Project: ie Type of Inspection: ...2 LIW /44 // )ii Address: /...4_ Date Called: _54 Special Instructions: Date Want ,. —5";...(5 - �r- ( p.m. Requester: Phone No: INSPECT! c N NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit (206)431 -36(70 Corrections required prior to approval. ri $58.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: • ,1 Project: ,.t Type of Inspection: \J 2 ' n,-. 7. Cr%, Address: W337 ,c"r l Date Called: Special Instructions: Date Wanted: 7.,----S-7— o6 Requester: Phone No: INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 r: • INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit Approved per applicable codes. El Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: ri $58.00 REINSPECTION F REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Project: ? Type of Inspection: Address: Lrg 3 7 /SO Date Called: Special Instructions: Date Wanted: ..� C24 Requester: Phone No: M INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. El Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: Inspector: El $58.00 REINSPECTION FE • EQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit Date: y PER ,, NO x: (2 r, 6)431 -3 Z Z re W U 0 0 to 0 to W WH W 2 2 u_ Q U � W ? F = - WO W U� O D. CI I— W H O . Z U= O ~ z Probe I . L /07 / Type of Inspection: // l/K/ 4 , /O 9C/4/' Address. £a3 7 c, /9' Date Called: Special Instructions: Date Wanted CO Requester: Phone No: ii la ti ,` u4,4' .4 k ;fs?u. ; w swage s INSPECTI s ' NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy `with permit (206)431 -3670 COMMENTS: r i' Zifeee 3) V ‘57 /ere -r 4 Aa a /i'7 : 5' uJ .1l l/ ,N..? km.A ro Corrections required prior to approval. $58.00 REINSPECTI6N FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Project: / �� ! .r � , t..i/'T/ ` Type of Inspection: t ie) ,A;,1 />'1, Date Called: - Address: • 4 837 So ,d Special Instructions: 1 i Phone Date Wanted: , Requester: No: INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 PERMIT O. 206)431 -367 { COMMENTS: e 8.00 REIN'PECT FEE REQUIRED Prior to inspection, fee must be aid at 6300 Southce ter Blvd., Suite 00. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Approved per applicable codes. J Corrections required prior to approval. G COMMENTS: - Type of Inspection: Ve 1 e- 11qsJ O NN1AC ►..) d �� CI \ -) i r a c04 (N - II Af‘.ar -d) v..) ■ (M..) Pt G1 ' - ds 44,6 Special • 1■\CYCE % O 1 4-- - t o 1 fSLct- ACT bVk 1- _.)/ IN e r - -c a-k i 0..4,, S • G c I..) -s;( Q 6- k )--/....) u) t - k , ,i,., u 14. , i- Lr...‘ ,, -, Pr t: T Type of Inspection: _ Ad dre: _� t $ $ D Date Called: Special • et INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. PERMIT OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. nsp ct• : • ,ss;, Rece , i t No.: (Corrections required prior to approval. D — e: r $ 8.00 REINSPECTIO FEE REQUIR D. Prior to inspection, fee must be I id at 6300 Southcen -r Blvd., Sui a 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Date: • -: QI- W 6 0 0 N J LL � w0 2 u_ ? = W rr z0 W U � O N CI I— W W H 0 W Z to 0 z Pro: ( 1 1 ..._ z... it Type of Inspection: Addrus: 9 93 - 7 Date Called: (----- Special Instructions: . Date Wanted: 5 -- 1. --- ° (a.m. Requester: Phone No: ..•••■••••••• 44i.4 .44:44 a\ . 2 INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION •s 4: ;7 • . " tO El Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain.a copy with permit PERMi 4 •C 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431-367 IR_ Corrections required prior to approval. C,e...)pe)4 fkfet..1% C J ns tor: etAiw-7 A A )1 $ 8.O0 REINSPECT! t4 FEE REQUIRE . Prior to inspection, fee must be aid at 6300 Southcenter BlCid., Suit 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Da -5-- Z •5— 0 (1 Date: COMMENTS: i e) al 00.1A4 ;L--r COMMENTS: . . " . �� - W + �/� ��l }`-- .�.�� ��� �.� tip d /.� J /'vI t) J 0 / -r ? 9, --,C92 S.-14: _s #474j9mi1// d? / T^ J / '/ I( / / w Pro ct: Type of Inspection: I ( T - 7 _ c . e ( e4.57 f" 41/ ill Address: Date Called: 4'37 S . / :U S7' Special Instructions: Date Wanted: (A 5' 2.2 - OL p.m. Requester: Phone No: 34JSVa!S" INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 El Approved per applicable codes. ector: $58.00 REINSP CTION FEE R ED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blv ., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. keceipt No.: n:y:.�,.:.,r .,;.?rear•' -^:n ..'.,�^wyon -:. ;,i��.�i:h::_ ._: INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit UI �► 4.1.1 441,24 , I /) t Date: Date;._ - 2 Corrections required prior to approval. i 34JSVa!S" INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 El Approved per applicable codes. ector: $58.00 REINSP CTION FEE R ED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blv ., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. keceipt No.: n:y:.�,.:.,r .,;.?rear•' -^:n ..'.,�^wyon -:. ;,i��.�i:h::_ ._: INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit UI �► 4.1.1 441,24 , I /) t Date: Date;._ - 2 Corrections required prior to approval. i COMMENTS: 7 t',4 0 7 fr,- 42 i ' - 4944e/rtvi ,,..-- , 52 e ; -17 C?, •Olvellirt....„—' / 2, 1,1-i (6) -A) „,,,,,,, el 7?, 73(i",-1-',9 e7 y / i . /4-7; -,A/ ...- 6,.7: / „.._,,,--e e r,,,,,,,-(4_,---, ,...74.- .., -6- . 1r , 2 - 1 . :, 3 ' ' - I" o, 7-1' 2)i1 11 :7 1 ',Lis/ ( _'7 2 "Z — O 6 Cii,in:6. Requester: Projec 1 ' ( : / :24i.9-7 1 - Type of Inspection: - Fli( e; Address: «e.1-7 7 S / Cc) .../ Date Called: i ... Special Instructions: Date Wad: -, --- 2 "Z — O 6 Cii,in:6. Requester: Phone No: .", 9 INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 981 88 El Approved per applicable codes. 'Corrections required prior to approval. Insp tor: 4 4 , 44 , 41 ) / 41.--7 , c k.., ...e7P Date.....-.... 2 7 c., 5,00 REINSPECTIO FEE REQUIREp. Prior to inspection, fee must be • paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: PER ( 06)431-36 7 COMMENTS: Type of Inspection: .e Address: ? /..5 _rt 7 ,,,,,9- 0,„40,/,--- i Special Instructions: Date Wanted: 05 A.5 / Requester: Phone No: /4". .4z;/ / ,-16 d ...........,, •■ Project: ' . l / 0 ket4ili Type of Inspection: .e Address: ? /..5 _rt Date Called: Special Instructions: Date Wanted: 05 A.5 / Requester: Phone No: - • ^7-7" ••• El Approved per applicable codes. Receipt No.: ' 2-0(VDO 254'z / INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSP ION NO. PERMIT CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 981 88 (206)431-3670 Corrections required prior to approval. 5 ./ / paid at 6300 South nter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. 8.00 REINSPECT! N FEE REQUIRED/rior to inspection, fee must be Date: :4-1 COMMENTS: Type glans ection: ' r 1 I N E NI e - // ii, 4 „,,,,,/a,„, - Address: H 3 S. t = /v 1 r . • .5 L- Date Called: A./.t- l5 .? v ,i .. "/z t-t Date W nted: '5 I Z— tr io -e-V d`d-- - / Requester: 2/ ,4' 6//- -7 ,-.ts. a o'e G ' - ''' 'r )4) / /14/ - 5 Zni "9 dlro )0 7 fri /6 , S A /re A.5 6) - /'/ei-� I J7 C.f 6,,-k e' /-7(44-5, r rfixll(, 2 r6 j sc -r I ) e emhu4/c�lvrs r pI.v c� /ri / `/SS 4../..q1/.5- y J / T h -55 6 0 el i ii/ #1/.5 (5) ) / • ; A/ L 7� l • (/ . V I' / f se /r' /* Project: 4 zf 2 C Type glans ection: ' r 1 I N E \... Address: H 3 S. t O s-f-. Date Called: Special Instructions: Date W nted: '5 I Z— tr io a . p.m. Requester: Phone No: INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 El Approved per applicable codes. nspecto INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit bb l -42 t PER (206)431 -3 T NO. NEI Corrections required prior to approval. .00 REINSPECTION FE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcente lvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: COMMENTS: e - se ." d. ... . , J . 4.1 — Z-7) Ak 4- 17 /), ,77-, C.-tei e _/..."- -- i /')-, A -it ---..) ‘7, .1-7,, .46 3.- s frr-7/ elt len //-5, y .0 il /),,.., tirt.-, pool-- i I, /--- (/, a./1/ •_/_., s.. 3 ---- ) 5/.4.-0, //s 4 ze 1.... e h e , -)--) s) p7 (71." e ,.#_,./.9...9.1,- ,i eh-x, s -60 /-7 ,,, , 4) 4176•Za 6 I t Lf../4 /1 G of 47-4-40 I .../..e, te.r.. f / C/199v- A /1- /40 ca.- I- A -,/4 / foA--- fz 04Plii4.e _ / le //..-yr Z, b 7 ,4. C Project: P Frac- R.- 0. ();•.3 CT: Type of Inspection: _.... Address: t! F7 S. IS0 si- Date Called: _ Special Instructions: . Date Wanted: LI — 27.... 0 c (a.m... p.m. Requester: Phone No: r • „•• t : • • • ;.• • • „ . • INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION - 74 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431-36 Approved per applicable codes. Receipt No.: • . , , / I • I P ,1)0 Li Z. ( EI Corrections required prior to approval. Inspector: de- 102-a ri $58.00 REINSPECT! N FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedute reinspection. Date: 9 _6; Date: Project: Type of I, spect' n: Addres) .., S , t 5 0 s \. Date Called: Special Instructions: Date Wanted: Date Wanted: H ..._11 --aC' p.m. Requester: Phone No: Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPE ION NO. CITY S F TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: $ 8 00 REINSPECTIO1d FEE REQUIRED. Prior t4 inspection, fee must be p 'd at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: is COMMENTS: ' ' � � 1 is4, - ,Nj I - -e_ 1 ( :( 4 f &- j F g j � . C ) 7-9-) 1 'i ' i € ( NA ,AJ ,M 14 7 ►`terk e c4i-e"'I }e fi D « - rn 0/IQ e C) Pr , - V• , - r kL �phkii\J ( , &-:- ph d-I . Date Called: - . Special Instructions: ,„... Pr ect: 1l Z4lti ��v.. Type of Inspection: S. ei u) fi ALclre � ` ( 0 S4 Date Called: - . Special Instructions: Date W ted: ^- I -- LA C: ...2 (Afar Requester: Phone No: INSPECTION NO. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Ei Approved per applicable codes. pecto � (206)431 -3 T4 Corrections required prior to approval. Dat L/ _ REINSPECTI N FE i REQUIRED. PAor to inspection, fee must be 1-7 rtaj at 6300 Southcenter lvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: 'Date: Ir Z = Z CC W 6 U 00 coo -I _ (.0 LL W 0 u_ � Z = 0 Z 1.11 ui U O 0— 0 I-- W W H H O W Z 0~ z COMMENTS: Type of Inspection: 'a'u,2 r;2 i< Address: •/4,30 5 'i7L 0-7-c N W 2 if Y l 2 (c / C C Date Want d: f '� /21 f 2s c V yv.72N I - ' --2_,,,-L. F n h, c: BUT 0ie!'.v,Tt; a� -1 cc.. `-- -v..--. P ,-' Project: Pi Ti<C�1c - 14-0,---c Type of Inspection: 'a'u,2 r;2 i< Address: •/4,30 5 M is.. Date Called: 2 /� 1 � Special Instructions: • Date Want d: f '� /21 f 2s c Requester: V2/r? ' b 1-k Ffi i-- Phone No: SCO - Yg 9 Do 4 1— 4/2 / INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Approved per applicable codes. O Corrections required prior to approval. Inspector: � Date: Z / ZI /0 $58.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Z Z W UO coo W = ' J 1` W O 2 g _ cn = W H = Z 1.- ZO W W 0 O — o I- W W • O lll U = . O ~ Z Project: }-P / i Z 2 Type o Inspection:t /a 6 / //v6 1> :2I /ivJ A e� S-. _ `` / / 5 V ? . Date Called: f _ a / to ----- Special Instructions: Date Wa d: , ` U L a. m. p.m. Requester: Phone No: INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISIO 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 0. (206)431 - 36 Approved per applicable codes. O Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: • c Inspe t pF: rt,IA . ,AjCA 1 Date: / le " C3 5 8.00 REINSPECTIOP FEE REQUIRED Prior to inspection, fee must be aid at 6300 Southcent r Blvd., Suite 00. Call to sechedule reinspection. eceipt No.: Date: Z cc W QQ J U 0 u) ILI W = W O u_¢ W = W ' ? F- ZO W c o 0 O — O I— W W H � tL O .z W N I 0 Z COMMENTS: r7 A dress: %''.,5--7 /$�5 t ZhC0A6 ,11- 7:cklit.., ,f,tti 4,4t- fit- `' , tJ - . �/ e J) I[. Date Wanted: • 04/6/06 t, �.fl Zaih : TJ Yir ,,I, ji1 oA ,J - C,.-e A2/ rd / 14,, s4 ake CA . / Pro'ect: 1 - 1 - 2e' - )-at I Type of Inspe ion: b - DOLOPSpvcvt A dress: %''.,5--7 /$�5 t Date Called: 0.2/45/o Spe is Instructions: Date Wanted: • 04/6/06 a Requester: Phone No: ,e `003 - 6 / ht/ Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit PERMIT NO. INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. Inspector: 6 AJ Date: .2 -X C. El $58.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Z 1 z . �W QQ � JU 00 N CO Ill -I _ W 2 u. ? = W H Z F Z F . W U � oI WW 11 :0 .. Z W U =. 0 E- Z Project: p r 'Type of Inspection: - A ' Date Called: Special Instructions: f - / / ,) Date Wanted: a.m. p.m. Requester: Phone No: /ozi!I-)2/ INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. PERMIT NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION • 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 El Approved per applicable codes. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 2 %%1 b Silt k:e41.6t hv}JJL A) Al s 1714€4 �, S'Lh • r a,/'- 9' l r.. vu) Inspector: 64l Date: / , $58.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule rein erection. Receipt No.: Date: 1• cc Lu J U U 0 w J • = w 0 • 0 J u_? N d = W H Z f.. Z° W U� CI W H � W Z w • = O~ Z Project: i 2�,,L . Type of Inspection: 2,00 06,» -f?- 44, Addres : 37 /5 - o�- Date Called: Special Instructions: - [�!-" 1 Date Wanted: 2,--(o-- P.m. Requester: Phone No: Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -367 CO ENTS: Date: Corrections required prior to approval. 0 $58.00 REINSPECTIO FEE REQ IRED. prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: 'Date: Z W Q Q 2 J U O 0 0 CO CO MI J F W 0 gQ (I) = W Z ir- 0 Z W U 0 O — O I- W • W tL tll Z . co 0~ Z Project ) L ' ', pee of Inspection: Type ,z f / 1 4 Address: .5 :?1,3 / Date Called: ..ry Special Instructions:. Date Wanted: i� 2---Z-04 �_ a.m p.m. Requester: Phone No: INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTI I N NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 COM ENTS: Inspector: Approved per applicable codes. El Corrections required prior to approval. Date: ` El $58.0 EINSPECTION'FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcent9 Blvd., Suite 100. Call to sechedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: Z W 6 6 U N CO Ili aI.- W D- u. _ a W ? W O W U O N O H W UJ H - L I O W Z U = 0~ Z Project: Sprinklers: Type of Inspection: I Address: Suite #: 4 4 ) 3 ? S /a" S +. Contact Person: Special Instructions: s. r e Occupancy Type: Phone No.: Needs Shift Inspection: A,v Sprinklers: Fire Alarm: Hood & Duct: Monitor: Pre -Fire: Permits: Occupancy Type: i INSPECTION NUMBER Approved per applicable codes. Word /Inspection Record Form.Doc INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA FIRE DEPARTMENT 444 Andover Park East, Tukwila, Wa. 98188 206- 575 -4407 12/2/05 [� 0 /4 —L i)... PERMIT NUMBERS Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: Fill „I 01< /-1/drt,n- 0 i; '-t n T l/i c, V 2/1 ;l t. I c v licl ti ' Inspector: .S / Date: 8-/(v- p C. Hrs.: $80.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be aid at 444 Andover Park East. Call to schedule reinspection. p Receipt No.: Date: T.F.D. Form F.P. 85 z I z QQ • � J U O 0 W I U) w 0 w¢ = a � w z = � w ~ • w U � • N • H W .. z O z • y FIELD REPORT Cornerstone INO Geotechnical, Inc. 17625 130th Avenue NE C102 Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: 425 - 844 -1977 Fax: 425 - 844 -1987 Attachment: Distribution: Project: Owner: Location: Weather: Purpose of Visit: Guillermo Property Pitzer Homes Tukwila Sun Wall Evaluation We visited the site today at the request of Daniel O'Connor, with Pitzer Homes, for evaluating the construction of a block walls that have been installed on the north si• - of - I tvATt wiIa This was our first observation of the construction for this project, and we have not . e 1, i1 JV tSION , have we observed any of the exposed subgrades or construction methods for the constructed wall or residence. Upon our arrival, we observed that two small landscaping block walls had been completed. The geometry of the walls was recorded with a tape measure in the field during our visit. The walls consist of two tiers, each with an exposed height of 4 feet. The walls have batter of 1H:6V, with an overall height of approximately 8 feet. The concrete blocks used were 6 inches thick and 14 inches wide. The lower tier has an embedment of 4 to 6 inches, and the upper tier has an embedment of approximately 6 inches to 1 foot. The concrete parking and patio area has already been poured up to the back edge of the wall, and the stairway to the front entrance of the residence has also been installed, as labeled on the attached site plan. The asphalt and trench drain planned for the north edge of the parking area had not been constructed. The contractor informed us that the topsoil had been removed from the area of the wall and that the base blocks were placed on native soils. He also informed us that perforated drains were placed behind the base rock on both tiers and an additional drain had been placed near the surface behind the top block of the lower tier. The drain near the surface flows south to the residence downspout, and the two drains at the base of the walls drain to the dispersion trench planned to be located east of the residence. We observed tight -lined drains exiting from the north edge at the base of each tier, and we observed the north end of the surface drain near the surface of the bottom tier. The contractor informed us that pit run fill, mixed with small amounts of onsite native soils, was used as backfill behind the wall blocks and below the concrete slab. We performed three small hand pits excavated with a shovel, in the locations labeled on the attached site plan. Hand Pit 1 and 2 encountered approximately 1 -foot of brown silty fine sand with gravel and straw, which we interpret to be topsoil. Below the topsoil we observed dark brown to brown silty fine sand with gravel and trace organics, which we interpret to be fill down to a depth of approximately 1.5 feet. Below the fill we observed brown silty fine sand with gravel, which we interpret to be medium dense native weathered till, down to a depth of approximately 2 feet. In Hand Pit 3 we encountered approximately 0.5 feet of drain rock overlying gray fine to coarse sand with gravel, which we interpret to be pit run backfill. We evaluated the fill and native soils around the base rocks for each tier with a'/2 inch diameter probe rod, and it penetrated less than 8 inches. RECEIVED CITY Of TUKWILA AUG IL i�.a.,....'.�.L.:..�..,�: S:..i::;:+a�.; ::tt.i' "S:•'wLtrst3:i4i:7. 4a;k*' r - -• Inn COPT File No.: 1755 Date: Report Page: By: 2006 -08 -15 • C = •g 0 n/s JLWED FOR • COMPLIANCE rilf$n '1lAm m g 2 2 2006 Signed: 9 nn z z re m1 6 6U U U J � w w g • ? w d =w z f .. o Z E- w w U � o � o I- wW t1- Z U= o � z Attachment: Distribution: FIELD REPORT Project: Guillermo Property File No.: 1755 Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Owner: Pitzer Homes Date: 2006 -08 -15 17625 130th Avenue NE C102 Location: Tukwila Report No: • j Woodinville, WA 98072 Weather: Sun Page: 2 of 4 Z Purpose of Wall Evaluation 6 Phone: 425 - 844 -1977 Visit: o Fax: 425 - 844 -1987 By: MAS w w w 0 g u. co � w z Zo w uj U � 0L/' cE- w Li O ij W z O z A typical section of the walls is shown on page 4 of this field report. We estimated soil parameters based on the exposed soils observed for the global stability analysis. The Results of our analysis is shown in Figure 4. The landscaping block walls should be adequate based on our additional recommendations that include: both tiers be embedded at least 1.5 feet, and that no vehicle surcharge loading should occur within 5 feet from the back of the top block of the wall. The additional embedment should be accommodated by placing structural fill and compacting it with a plate compactor in 6 to 8 inch lifts. The restriction of vehicle surcharge loading should be accommodated by placing a barrier that will keep vehicles from parking within 5 feet of the wall. We also recommend a hand rail be placed near the top of the wall as a safety precaution. Signed: HIdUN 1 0Z 0 11dM >13 01S 3N 03 'X3 0 01.= % 4/4 v• / 449'4 I' ° P . 13 S4 A 1 e p•• ¢ 3❑.3S'E I 1110dSNM 00 3H1 I L 03133NN ❑3 . Id 03 /Vd1:Id3d .t7 3Sn ❑H 8 t V a . • V..• V ' I Veibba 1-4v6J1.1 4 00).cku ovoMI!^, ssL1 097 •,,Z 3E 11VHS 3dId JO 3d ❑3S WnWINIW '3dId 31EIX31.J 031'd9ndd 03 :9 d❑ 3dId OIoId 11VP1 HI❑ ❑WS d313WVIOi ,ti JO WnWINIW d 3E: 11VHS 3dId '3Sn ❑H 3H1 JO d3Nd 03 ISd3H1d ❑N 3H1 IV If0dSNM ❑0 3H1 01 133NN ❑3 ONb 11VM >1301E d3ddn 3H1 JO 1N3ddn3 3H1 0Nn❑dV • SSVd 11IM NIddQ 031101S 1 W❑8J 3dId 'IWP JAIda 313d3N 03 JO 3903 Zelol 3H1 3❑ 13 01 NIHlIM NIVd0 AVP13AIda 031101S 11d1SNI 90 V D • D V NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. P . . D D I • v �9 ` - 3d�3S RIt ❑ 1 � vA003;1 ❑MD SVVIuHl A3Adns -83c. 8I'00I =r313: .. D D ;. 'd11- 1SVM%M >Id S3N 0d3 D . o o v • , D D D. . 3H1 ❑1 M ❑33 Hld ❑N 3HI ❑IN❑ 91 d= SIHl OINI 17 ❑IN❑ AVM W ❑d3 7 d3IVM 3H1 A131VWI ONIISIX= lI 3H1 ❑1 d AVMJAI •,00'20I AdM3ARICI 1S3M 11VHdSd Hln ❑S 3H 3H1 (X8' 3H1 I NI 11V.Hc 3H1 OP 133r: QNd 03: JO 35 _ 30 _ a 25 _ Q 20 15 _ 10 0 1755WALX 8 -15 - ** 9:11 davis 10 most critical surfaces, MINIMUM BISHOP FOS = 1.631 5 Static conditions $w% = )r54-4 U3Spec I I i I 10 15 20 25 X —AXIS (feet) 30 X i [¢_ a :: psi' . l"LS pc.e Ao- = r 3o pc-f 35 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR1-IAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 40 � T� OUTSIDE INSIDE REPAIRS DEPOSIT $ /00 Gz-- OWNER 4(AI' /40TheAS -LW/ HOUSE ADDRESS S & NAME. SUB - DIVISION TAX LOT No. � �(.X7 •- 440 I - -- — - -- -TN . 11. II II I . �MH FUo Z5 DISTRICT APPROVAL BY TEST RESULTS Ale. ,, ._ PVC N APPLICATION FOR SIDE SEWER PERMIT VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT 14616 Military Road S. • Seattle, Washington GiLgVE � ,6' I V w . , ay! -Fy ;GRASS _ ; REh III I I�! I I CONTRACTOR BASEMENT: YES I3 NO LOT No. B K.. No. SCALE L_ _L_ 4 _ _ i . 7 1 1 I . . AS *t? + - Me61: $03 L18o5. 1. co .. I II I t I- - 1 - -- - -- Ici - PERMIT 6108 EASEMENT No. RECEIPT No. DATE // //de, �1 _ _l. �. I I E -ONE. Pt1rm3. - rs4Nk. w� RtiioriP,US - -- GvN't P AWE I= A 3;A6s -_. -. _ 1 i ____L___: t 1 -- • -1- - CcR -AVEL: _ DR;IVEWA+l 22 '1519 To 4 i 7 I HEREBY CERT FY THAT THE ABOVE CONNECTION HAS BE M AS SHOWN, PRIOR TO BACKFILL Z �_- Z W OC 00 co CO W • 0 g L co I- F— 0 w ~ W U C) O -- O I— WW I-- H Z . 1j = OH z W etland Delineation Report for the "GUILLERMO PROPERTY" (Aka. City of Tukwila Application No. D04-421) n t copy Site located at perM t N 4837'S, 150th Street, City of Tukvfillo WA,,98188 Tax Parcel No. 004200fROt the Situated in the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of ection 22- T23N -R4E, W.M., King County;.; PREPARED FOR Jim Pitzer,Jr., President itzer Homes, Inc. (Aka Timberstone Homes 46533 284 SE Enumclaw, WA 98022 Phone: 360- 802 -4909 : Fax: 360- 802 -4908 ,Cell: 253-632-9159 PREPARED BY . HN COMIS ASSOCIATES For Wetlands, Streams, & Mitigation Designs since 1989 222 East 26th Street, #103 Tacoma, WA 98.421 • Office: (253) 272 -6808 Fax: (253) 272 -6807 Mobile: (253) 686 -4007 - mail: ,corms a•jolincomisassociates.corn RECEIVED ,, CITY OFTUKWILA SEP 2 7 2005 PERMIT CENTER : 111LVA. JOHN COMIS ASSOCIATES IFor Wetlands, Streams, & Mitigation Designs since 1989 . Q 222 E. 20 Street, #103 0 _ Tacoma, WA 98421 Office: (253) 272 -6808 Fax: (253) 272 -6807 v O E -mail: jcomis(johncomisassociates.com co 0 July 8, 2005 w F co LL w 0 gas LL CO ti = w H ? 1--0 Z1-- w Li I 0 O N O H I O w z 0 0 1- City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: 206- 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 SUBJECT: Wetland Delineation Report for the Pitzer - Guillermo Property @ Tukwila, Parcel No. 0012000401, located at 4837 S. 150 Street, situated in the City of Tukwila, NE 1 /4 of Section 22- T23N -R4E, W.M., King County, WA (City of Tukwila Application/File No. D04 -421) To Whom It May Concern: On 2/5/05, John Comis Associates (JCA) completed a wetland delineation at the subject site. This work included a routine onsite determination and delineation of regulated wetlands situated within and adjacent to the site boundary. This detailed onsite delineation by JCA and land survey by GeoDatum, Inc. shows the wetland edge as it extends into the subject property (see Site Survey Map, Figure 5, for details). The offsite wetland area is included for this analysis as it applies to the study for this site. Please note that a wetland reconnaissance was done by JCA in this area on 2/08/04 for the adjacent offsite property to the southeast. At that time, the general wetland area was identified (see parcel map and field note sketch maps in Appendix 2 for details). The field analysis included a determination and delineation of "regulated wetlands" on the subject site, or within 100 feet'- of the site boundary. Wetlands are delineated using the Washington Stale Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, March 1997, prepared by the Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE Publication #96 -94). This State Wetlands Manual is required to be used by all state agencies in the application 1 The 100 -foot distance is the standard buffer width for the highest rated Type I wetland. This represents a reasonable distance from which a "regulated activity" should not impact a "regulated wetland" (per Tukwila Municipal Code [TMC] Chapter 18.45). Pitzer - Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 z of any state laws and regulations as well as any city or county in the implementation of any regulations under the Growth Management Act. The methodology used is also consistent with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. The analysis and classification (i.e. rating) of "regulated wetlands" is also made in accordance with the City of Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) and regulations pertaining to wetlands and watercourses (TMC 18.45, effective December 2004). Please refer to Appendix 1 for details of methodology used for delineation of.onsite and offsite wetlands. The details for methodology used for this analysis are provided with this report in Appendix 1. The Field Data Forms completed by JCA for sample test plots within the regulated wetland are provided in Appendix 2. Soils Survey data and descriptions for the general site area are provide in Appendix 3. A completed wetland rating form (WDOE, 2004) for the onsite and offsite wetland area is provided in Appendix 4. References (both general and specific) and resumes for the wetland consultant that performed this work are provided in Appendix 5 and 6 respectively. The size of the wetland is determined after the wetland specialist completed the detailed delineation. The size of the wetland is measured by methods such as a land survey for regulatory purposes. For offsite wetland areas, the size may be estimated by the wetland specialist based on best available data such as aerial photo or soil survey maps or other wetland inventory or study data. The sizes of some smaller onsite areas may be measured using onsite methods such as hip chain or tape measure by the wetland specialist. However, if the wetland area is close to a threshold size (1,000 square feet for Type 3 wetlands, see Appendix 1 -E for details), then a more detailed survey may be required to determine the precise size of the wetland. After the wetland boundary is delineated and the size is determined, then the wetland is "rated" or categorized for regulatory purposes in accordance with the 3- tiered standard adopted by the City of Tukwila TMC Chapter 18.45 (see Appendix 1 -E for details). Please note that this rating by JCA also includes the use of the WDOE Rating Form as an aid to support the wetland rating that may be approved by City for applicable buffer standards and setback requirements. These standards are applied to situations where the boundaries of wetlands overlap onto adjacent properties or where they may be contiguous along a stream (i.e. riparian) corridor, or are separated by open water bodies or uplands as in a patchwork (i.e. "mosaic ") on the landscape (see Appendix 4 for details). FINDINGS We found a saturated, seepage fed wetland (called "Wetland A" for this study) that extends along the southeastern side of the site. The wetland extends offsite to the south and east, and has a watercourse situated in a well defined channel flowing out of the area toward 51 Ave. S. The channel was flowing at this time. The watercourse flowed into catch basins and piped storm drains under 51 Ave. S. Drainage from the area appears to generally be toward the east through private property toward the I -5 freeway. Pitzer- Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 2 • ...' 14.41 1i1: -0 The watercourse appears to originate in the offsite portions of Wetland A just to the south and flows through the southeast corner of the subject property. It precedes offsite to the east through a small clearing on an adjacent single- family residence and falls into catch basins and a storm drain along the west side of 51 Ave. S. The channel appears to be stable and is well vegetated and shaded at this time. The flow of drainage waters appears to be intermittent out of the wetland area. The watercourse does NOT appear to be situated within a designated 100 -year flood plain (see Hydrographic Information Map, Figure 4). The tributary area is relatively small and the hydrology source for the wetland appears to primarily come from groundwater seepage along the toe of the steep hillside and not from surface runoff from developments along the upper part of the small tributary area. The watercourse flows offsite into 2 catch basins along the west side of 51 Ave. S. The watercourse and other drainages in this area are not shown as "streams" on the current Hydrographic Information Map (Figure 4). The drainage pattern and location of the watercourse flowing out of the wetland area is indicated on the 2/08/04 "Davis - Pitzer Site @ Tukwila" Field Note Sketch Map (FNSM) by JCA in Appendix 2. The drainage channel through the corner of the subject property is classified as a Type 4 Watercourse in accordance with the TMC 18.45.100 -A. It has intermittent flow and is not used by salmonid fish as described above. The standard buffer width is 50 -foot wide (TMC 18.45.100 -D). Since the watercourse lies within the outer edge of the wetland, the buffer does not extend beyond the edge of the wetland buffer thorough this site. There are no ONSITE wetlands found within the UPPER part of the property. The upper part of the site along the top of the hillside is entirely uplands and none of the upper area of the property meets the 3- parameter criteria for a determined wetland. The only wetlands within the site are along the lower toe of the hillside adjacent to Wetland A. There is One (1) ONSITE wetland found within the LOWER part of the property. On 2/5/05, John Comis Associates (JCA) completed a detailed delineation of Wetland A situated generally along the toe of a hillside in the southeastern part of the site. This work included a routine onsite delineation of the vegetated wetland edge within the site boundary. Wetland A is at the headwater of the drainage course and hydrologically connected. The onsite portion of the wetland edge extends along the toe of the hillside to the west and south from delineation point #A10 located just below the confluence of the 2 watercourse channels draining directly out of the wetland (see FNSM in Appendix 2). The maps show consecutively numbered data points around the boundary of the wetland. Due to the close proximity of the offsite portions of Wetland A, the entire wetland is considered to be one (1) wetland in accordance with the WDOE wetland rating manual. Pitzer - Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 3 WL: SYSTEM CLASS SUBCLASS WATER REGIME (abbreviation) A palustrine scrub - shrub/ emergent broad - leafed deciduous seasonally flooded, partially drained (PSS /em1Cd) The field notes show other data points such as test plots (TP), habitat features such as vegetation lines, landmarks such as houses or fence lines, and various other site - specific information (see Appendix 2 for details). The survey map (Figure 5) shows the locations for larger trees within the onsite area. Those noted within the buffer area will be saved. However, the entire hillside is wooded with dense understory and overstory vegetation. Wetland 'A' includes the following data points: • 10 Wetland Delineation points ( #A1 to #A10) • 2 test plots (TP1 and TP2, Note that other test holes were examined but not recorded or flagged) The flagged points are marked with colored ribbon as follows: • "WETLAND DELINEATION- number" (pink ribbon, tied to vegetation, see circled numbers on sketch map) • "TEST PLOT - number" (blue and green ribbons, tied to vegetation, see triangles on sketch map) Wetland A is classified using the Cowardin et al ? method (see Appendix 1 for details). Vegetation classes within the wetland are generally characterized as follows: SUMMARY OF WETLAND VEGETATION CLASSES: The size of onsite and offsite Wetland A is estimated to be 9,540 square feet. The offsite portions are estimated based on the best available topographic and aerial photo map data and our earlier offsite investigation. The offsite portion of the steam channel to the east of wetland delineation points #A10 (see FNSM dated 2/5/05 and 2/8/04 in Appendix 2) is not included with the area calculation. The onsite and offsite portions of Wetland A are rated a "Type 3" wetland based on a 3- tiered system by TMC 18.45.080 B., "Wetland Ratings ", for regulatory purposes. Wetland A is greater than 1000 square feet in size but less than one acre as determined by the detailed onsite survey and the approximate offsite analysis method (@ 9540 square feet [0.219 acres] in total size). It has 2 vegetation classes as indicated above and on the WDOE rating form in Appendix 4. Note that this wetland is also rated a "Category IV" using the 4 -tier WDOE Wetland Rating System for Western Washington .a The WDOE Rating Form is completed by JCA and included with this report in Appendix 4 as an aid to support the recommended wetland rating that may be approved by the City for applicable buffer standards and setback requirements. 2 US Fish and Wildlife Service's "Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States ", FWS /OBS -79/31 Towardin et al, 1979) Washington State Department of Ecology, "Washington State Wetlands Rating System, Western Washington ", August 2004 Pitzer - Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 4 i'z�rudllifia;ct�au .Nil t1'1ti+tt4``»a i ?ft,+.a:u .sJa iu.s The standard buffer width is required to be 50 feet for this category wetland in accordance with the TMC 18.45.080 E, "Wetland Buffer Widths ". Please note that no buffer modification plan is proposed for this area at this time. However, a buffer modification plan may be proposed to decrease this standard width in accordance with the TMC 18.45.080 G, "Variation of Standard Wetland Buffer Width ". Wetland A appears to be a "slope wetland" that is hydrologically connected and directly associated with storm drain system along the west side of 51' Avenue South. The site is situated near the headwaters of a small unnamed tributary that flows generally southeast into the "Southcenter Interchange and Mall Drainage System" in the SW '/4 of Section 23- T23N -R4E, W.M., King County, Washington (see Figure 6 for general drainage patterns, topography and watersheds in this area). The offsite portions of Wetland A south of the flagged wetland are approximately delineated by JCA based on "offsite methodology" using best available topographic and aerial photo map information (obtained from King County GIS IMAP data). We have added applicable buffer recommendations and notes to the final Site Survey Map (Figure 5) to show the regulated wetland and buffers, together with the recommended buffer notes, 10 -foot building setback line and other information such as `save' trees and recommendation for a final Site Plan Map. Potential impacts to the wetland are reduced or eliminated by the preservation of a 50- foot wide "no disturbance buffer" and the conditions as noted on the Site Survey Map. Buffer Notes: 1. Wetland Buffers are recommended to be 50 feet wide, unless buffers are modified by averaging or reducing as may be approved by the City of Tukwila. Buffer boundaries shall be measured horizontally from the flagged wetland delineation points. New buildings shall be set back an additional 10 feet from the buffer boundary line. 2. Wetland and buffers should be maintained as a "no disturbance" easement within this property. All regulated activities should occur only in areas outside the buffer boundary. A title notice may be recorded with the County Auditor to provide notice in the public record of the presence of wetland buffers within the site area. 3. Final buffer boundaries shall be marked by a land surveyor and signs posted at locations indicated on the site plan map. Signs shall be posted along the buffer boundary at 35 -foot intervals in areas nearest to the proposed development. 4. No building, clearing, filling or grading shall be permitted within designated buffer area, except as may be approved by the City of Tukwila for such reasons as danger tree removal. All regulated activities shall occur only in areas outside the final buffer boundary. 5. Maintenance within the designated buffers shall include removal of invasive or noxious weed species. Invasive species may include introduced and non - native plants such as Himalayan blackberry (Rebus discolor or Rubus lacinialus), Scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius), Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), or Tansy ragwort (Tanacetum vulgare). Removal of invasive and noxious plants must be by hand methods such as pulling, cutting or other approved method as may be allowed by the City. Disposal of plant residue must be done in approved areas outside the regulated wetlands or buffers. The final "Site Plan Map" will be provided by the project applicant under separate cover. Pitzer - Guillermo Property By John Cotnis Associates Date: 07/08/05 5 ' a 4,se ([+ ,"a7�«i�s'ivY+ih�;rul +.� ^ ziu i4SY «ti,.rwt:d.Ktn.'h;iF : nv`j, DISCLAIMER Please be advised that JCA has provided professional services that are in accordance with the degree of care and skill generally accepted in the performance of this environmental evaluation. Wetland determinations and delineations, classifications, ratings, and buffer recommendations should be reviewed and approved by the local government agency with permitting authority and potentially other agencies with regulatory authority prior to extensive site design or development. No warranties are expressed or implied by this study until approved by the appropriate resource and permitting agency(s). The findings and recommendations expressed in this report are based on my professional judgment together with onsite and offsite investigations and other available data obtained from sources indicated in the report. If you have any questions or comments regarding these findings or recommendations, please feel free to call me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, ry.z. Jo . Comis, PWS ertified Wetlands Specialist File: \ Pitzer- GuillermoSF @TukwilaRpt.doc (JCA Job #050127) Cc: Jim Pitzer, Jr., President, Pitzer Homes, Inc. (Aka Timberstone Homes) Mike Davis & John Tamburelli, Davis Real Estate Group Enclosures: (see figures and appendices) FIGURES: Figure 1. Vicinity Map (Thomas Bros. Atlas, 2004) Figure 2. Aerial Photo & Sensitive Areas Map (King County iMAP, 4/18/05) Figure 3. Soil Survey Map (1979, USDA SCS) Figure 4. Hydrographic Information Map (King County iMAP, 4/18/05) Figure 5. Site Survey Map (by GeoDatum, Inc., dtd 2/16/05) APPENDICES: Appendix 1. Methodology for Wetland Determination and Delineation Appendix 2. Field Data Forms and Field Note Sketch Map by JCA (dtd 2/5/05) Appendix 3. Soil Survey Report Attachments Appendix 4. WDOE Wetland Rating Form Appendix 5. Resumes for Wetland Consultants Appendix 6. References Pitzer - Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 6 7 1 °ta-5 s : LEGEND for Figure 1: w 13ittt; ;;, Yellow = project site Tax Parcel No. 0042000401 • Legal Description: Lot 8, Block 4 of Adams Home Tracts 2 Addn. • Site Address: 4837 S. 150 Street, City of Tukwila. WA 98188 • Site Location: situated in the SE 1/4 of the NE Vs or Section 22-T23N-R4E. \V.M., King County, Washington Map Source: Thomas Brothers Road Atlas. Page 655 F -4, 2004. S 167TH :ST: 142ND r BLVD':' N . =..5 Ylc�r��T Y MAP JOHN COMIS ASSOCIATES Wetlands, Roodplains, Drainage 1 King County ` Wetlands, Roodplains, Drainage Home News r Comments JOHN COMIS ASSOCIATES may: Search iMAP - Property Information (Planning) Selected Parcels County Boundary Streets tl;grocu Molar; Loral Forest Production District Boundary I, Agricultural Production District Boundary Legend Lakes and Large Rivets Streams Parcels Incorporaled Area 2002 Color Aerial Photos (West KC only) 2000 Color Aerial Photos A The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. ny sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County. AMON-. PMOTb SeNtisrnvE ARzA MAP MOWN \ IA .ate• LEGEND for Figure 3: ` \ Course Soils mapped in the project site by King County Soil Survey) AgC = Aldenvood gravelly sandy loam, 6 -15% slopes AmC = Arcnts, Alderwood material disturbed by urbanization, 6 -15% slopes [Inclusions of other soils that may be found in the `AgC' -map unit per King Co. Soils Survey may be up to 15% poorly drainedj: No = Noma fine sandy loam, flat- concave (hydric) Bh = Bellingham silt loam, flat <1 %slopes ( hydric) *t>; ' `+ Sm = Shalcar muck l , ; ;,, : 3•• • 1 Tu = Tukwila muck * & tas/' 1-' t4 L-' 14 * Note: Ilydric soils are based on the list per "Ilydric Soils of King County" by NRCS. Inclusions of other soil types may occur within a map unit. See King County Soil Survey report for soil descriptions. Map Source: a portion of sheet 10, Soil Survey of King County, USDA Soil Conservation Service, November 1973. •••• ■ I .• • • OS • • Foster L ; ao H •c if O • SO u RV E r M Wetlands, Roodplains, Drainage r JOHN COMIS ASSOCIATES yak f v.. • Ua Itirr .L w a' . 1 "1000 ■ (Fig: a , King County 7661600090 7661600094 °° 0042000247 OOt - .. t O.J42O(X3$55 Streets rtg•rnar Attsids Local Wetlands, Rooaplains, Drainage I ) 004200014 •.• 0042000147 '0042000148 004 20 00148 .. •.; . ..0042000216 .: — 0042000226 . dOd .:. 004200Di53 0042000219' p si Selected Parcels County Boundary 0 King County Drainage Basins Home 0042000225 0042000230 . 0042000 2 15 :OOf2000 • • S 1 5DTH_ST MAP - Hydrographic Information n , r (crr:1 News Parcels Lakes and Large Rivers Streams Incorporated Area King County Water Resource Inventory Areas 0042000160 Services 5 : Stilop -n isl 7:S,ranili 8 : Celr•Srnrn anisn 9 : Owe=ish•C,rom 10 : Pynrkc 'Wh 11:Nsgi ty 12 : Cnrrlbcrs Ctcr. The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. HYDRDWGY INORIiAT1QN M JOHN COMIS ASSOCIATES Comments • % bib Search ' S v:# t.tt As-Shows Fig: 4 1 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. °I t Mr • TOPO! map printed on 07/08/05 from "Untitled,tpo" \ GS84 122° 16' 00" W TN I�IN 18° GS84 122° 16' 0a" W .5 0 —=w= 10,10 FEET 0 •�1U! WINNER = ■•ONO• 500 yN3`- x�,w;' Mitt} SY" SM'!"!:'.'"'' y�,. 4??; 7;''! g�' r+ S? ?.;:- T"dr�i9`?c?d'A.tyr�;a *. =.•,r.: may,.;; {a too Map created with TOPO!® ©2003 National Geographic (w',v,Tr.nationalge FIG. z • W 6 JU O 00 co 0 co w W I F- w o 2 g Q c : = a w z = I- zt- w • w U� O - W W H� ll O w z • = O � Z Pitzer- Guillermo Property John Coatis Associates Date: 07/08/05 Z I ,- �~ W 6 J U U O N O J = I-- W O 2 < _ • a ▪ W Z F- O Z E- w U O N O I- ll! ui HI- u. O W Z • = O~ Z METHODOLOGY A. APPROACH USED FOR WETLAND DETERMINATION Wetlands are identified using the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, March 1997, prepared by the Washington State Department of Ecology (WDOE Publication #96 -94). This State Wetlands Manual is required to be used by all state agencies in the application of any state laws and regulations as well as any city or county in the implementation of any regulations under the Growth Management Act. The US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District has reviewed this manual method and approved it as a revised version of their Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y -87 -1, January 1987. The State Manual incorporates the amendments and clarifications in the 1991 and 1992 documents published by the COE that reflect more current technical information developed since the original COE Manual was published. It is the intent of the State Wetlands Manual to result in the identification and delineation of the same areas as would be identified and delineated under the COE Manual as may be applied for Federal reviews. The "criteria" which an investigator must use to determine if a test plot is a "wetland" are limited to the presence of all 3 wetland criteria: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. This means that to make a positive wetland determination, all 3 criteria must be positive. The absence of one, two, or all three of the criteria should result in a non - wetland determination. The presence of dominant "field indicators" is used to determine if a criterion is met. If a field indicator is absent, then an indirect indicator may be used. For example, the absence of inundation or saturation during a dry summer field investigation could result in the hydrology criterion not being met. However, the presence or absence of encrusted detritus on twigs or blackened leaves on bare ground in a depression may be used to help verify sufficient inundation during a wetter period of the growing season. The Manual stipulates 3 key provisions of the definition of wetlands include: a. Inundated or saturated soil conditions resulting from permanent or periodic inundation or saturation by ground water or surface water (saturation within 12 inches of the surface for at least 20 to 30 consecutive days during periods in the Mesic growing season [March thru October]). b. A prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions (hydrophytic vegetation). c. The presence of "normal circumstances ". The selection of a specific method and procedure for identifying wetlands may follow one of the following methods: • the "routine determination method" for undisturbed and non - problem area wetlands; • the "offsite determination method" for areas within 150' of the site boundary; and /or • the "disturbed area and problem area wetland determination procedures" for areas with disturbed or atypical vegetation, soils or hydrology. If an area is disturbed, then a higher level of analysis such as a "Comprehensive" determination method may be required. The preferred and simplest method is the "ROUTINE Determination Method" for typical, generally undisturbed areas with normal environmental conditions. For areas that are complex, confused, or have disturbed or altered environmental conditions, a "Comprehensive Pitzer - Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 8 r Determination Method" may be used. This method employs transect sampling procedures in areas that have been filled or graded where the vegetation, soils or hydrology condition can not be readily observed. Generally, the investigator is looking for a portion of the site (called a test plot) where a "typical condition" exists - -where a well established plant community is present with no evidence of recent clearing, grubbing, filling, grading, or soil drainage activities. This situation should occur during a period when "normal circumstances" are present. That is during periods of the year when normal environmental conditions such as moderate rainfall and average antecedent moisture conditions (AMC) exist within a wetland or a watershed area. For the hydrophytic vegetation criterion to be met, a dominant number (i.e. more than 50 %) of "OBL, FACW and /or FAC" indicator species must be present in the sample plot (see the discussion of these abbreviations in a later section of this appendix). The vegetation analysis is based on the 3 dominant species in each of 4 vegetation layers (or strata: trees, saplings /shrubs, herbs /grasses, and woody vines). Or if only 1 or 2 vegetation layers exist at the test plot, then 5 dominant species are used to make the determination. If a test plot has no well established vegetation due to recent clearing and grubbing, or the soils have been severely disturbed due to excavation, filling or grading activities, the test plot is called an "atypical situation ". In atypical or disturbed situations the wetland determination may be based only on soil borings into the undisturbed soil stratum below the fill line and by hydrology criteria. If an area is disturbed, then a higher level of analysis such as a "comprehensive" determination method may be required. The procedure used for each test plot is indicated on the individual data sheets. The environmental conditions that exist at the site on the day of the field investigations are indicated in field notes and marked in the appropriate "normal" (or not normal) blank at the top of the data sheet. If the vegetation, soils or hydrology are found disturbed, this is explained at the bottom of the sheet. The results for each test plot are recorded on data forms and included with this report in Appendix 2. B. KEY DEFINITIONS USED For this study, "wetlands" are defined using the adopted State of Washington's Growth Management Act definition: "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soils conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas." (Corps of Engineers Regulation 33 CFR 328.3, 1988) "Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non - wetland sites, including but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass -lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street, or highway. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non - wetland areas to mitigate the conversion of wetlands." Pitzer - Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 9 z 1 w a: 00 0 J w � Q d Z = ZO ul U � O 0 w t h 1 7- O ..z w J- 0 Other key definitions may also apply which are defined in the adopted City of Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) with definition and regulations pertaining to wetlands and watercourses (TMC 18.45). C. WETLAND DELINEATION CRITERIA By Vegetation: For this study, vegetation was primarily used, along with the soils and hydrology criterion, to delineate the edges of the identified wetland areas. This was due to the general lack of disturbances within the forested areas of the site. For wetland plant community delineations, we used vegetation that exists along the wetland margins where plants were well established and represent typical and normal conditions between hydrophytic and upland conditions. Plant communities were analyzed in detail and vegetation data were documented on Field Data Sheets for the individual test plots (TP, or sample plots) shown at locations on the report figures and on our field note sketch maps. The onsite analysis test plot data were extrapolated into the areas shown by JCA as "upland" on the Field Note Sketch Maps (see Appendix 2). For this study, a species is considered dominant in a test plot if more than 10% of the plants growing in that area appear to be the same species. This is an estimate of the relative density of a species in a sample area. By routine methods, this is usually made by visual inspection of the dominant plants in a representative sample area. As defined in the 1997 State Manual, a dominant species exerts a controlling influence on or defines the character of a plant community. Dominance on the other hand is used as a descriptor of vegetation that is related to the standing crop of a species in an area, usually measured by height, aerial cover, or basal area (for trees). This should not to be confused with a vegetation class that must comprise more than 30% of the aerial cover in the entire wetland (or upland). If more than 50% (i.e. 51 or more percent) of the dominant plant species in a test plot are OBL, FACW and FAC, then the hydrophytic vegetation criteria is said to be met and it is marked "yes" on the field data form. The specie identifications are based on available plant keys such as Hitchcock and Cronquist's Flora of the Pacific Northwest (1973). To determine whether plant species exhibit hydrophytic adaptations, if they are native or non- native (introduced), and which strata (tree, shrub, herb) they normally occupy, we use the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9), published by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, May 1988. The indicator statuses for the various species found in the area are determined based on the National List together with the December 1993 supplement for the Northwest Region. The indicator status describes the estimated probability of a plant species occurring in wetlands. Indicators are: OBL = Obligate Wetland species ( "almost always occurs ", >99% probability) FACW = Facultative Wetland species ( "usually occurs ", 67 -99% probability) FAC = Facultative species ( "equally likely to occur ", 34 -66% probability) FACU = Facultative Upland species ( "usually occurs in non - wetlands ", 67 -99% probability) UPL = Upland species ( "almost always occurs in non- wetlands ", >99% probability) NI = No Indicator assigned (If a species does not occur in wetlands in any region of the National List, then "no indicator is assigned ".) + = Slightly more frequently found in wetlands i.SfiiCi..a,1' TILL iJSYfnTFr.WW.r «Fww.. - -_. noiLia,ur , Pitzer - Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 10 z '~ w 6 J 0 U J H w 0 ur? N d F =. w z = Z O UJ • w U � w o • f- w W - iii r I O ~ z • - = Slightly less frequently found in wetlands * = Tentative assignment based on either limited information or conflicting reviews from the 1993 Northwest Supplement of the National List. Parenthesis () around an indicator signifies the status is assigned by JCA, and a question mark ( ?) after an indicator signifies it is tentative based on our (JCA) field experience & observations. By Soils: For wetland soil determination, we use the hydric soil criterion prescribed in Part III of the Washington State Manual. Hydric soils are defined as "a soil that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part." (USDA -NRCS 1995, Federal Register, 7/13/94, Vol. 59, No. 133, pp. 35680 -83). Note that the definition and criteria for hydric soils may change periodically as a result of revisions by the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils (NTCHS). In general, this occurs in the upper 12" of the soil profile and usually for 20 or more days during the period when soil temperatures are above biologic zero (41 In general, "organic hydric soils" develop as a result of prolonged anaerobic conditions with long periods of saturation impeding decomposition (peat or muck) and have greater than 16" of organic matter in the surface layer (Histosols). "Mineral hydric soils" have less than 16" of organic matter (if some is present, then it may have a 'histic epipedon'). They are saturated for more than 20 consecutive days during the growing season (the period when soil temperatures are above biologic zero, 41 °F, as defined by "Soil Taxonomy ", 1975; usually March- October), and contain dominant gleying and /or mottling. The soil color and /or presence of mottling and gleying in a sample are primary field indicators of whether a mineral soil is either hydric or non - hydric. Non - hydric soils are generally a rusty red or yellow color. Hydric soils are generally black, gray, or washed out in color. A field indicator for a saturated organic hydric soil is a rich black matrix color of say 2/1 or 2/2. A field indicator for a saturated mineral soil is a leached matrix color of say 3/1 or 4/1 or 5/1 or 6/1). A hydric mineral soil must have a low chroma color feature (at least 1 if not mottled, or a chroma 2 if prominent mottles are present in the soil matrix). Gleying and prominent mottling are color indicators of prolonged saturation and indicate that anaerobic conditions probably exist for sufficient periods of time to develop wetland soils. Gleyed soils are generally bluish -green to grayish -green in color throughout the soil mass or in mottles (spots or streaks) interspersed within the dominant soil color (matrix color) in a layer (soil horizon). Gleying results from the leaching of the dissolved (reduced) iron and manganese minerals out of the soil matrix. Soils gleyed to the surface or to the surface layer of organic material are generally considered hydric. Soils that are saturated throughout the year are usually uniformly gleyed to the surface (Tiner and Veneman 1987). Mottles are generally yellow to reddish brown blotches or spots accumulating in mineral soil due to a fluctuating water table during the growing season. The size, number and color of mottles reflect the duration of soil saturation and thus whether the soil is hydric. Mottling in hydric soils should be "distinct" or "prominent" in the upper horizon. Mineral soils that have a grayish matrix ( chroma 2 or less) with mottles are hydric if the mottles are not relict mottles. Mineral soils with a predominantly brown or yellow matrix and light gray mottles are not usually hydric. Q 4 Hydric Soils Guidebook, Washington State Department of Ecology, Pub. #90 -20, July 1990. Pitzer - Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 11 z Z re 2 w 0 O - 0 co 0 W I - it U) u_ w 0 g Q . ( I ) d = H z � t-- zt~ w w U O N 0 H w �- O w z O ▪ ~ z Yu144' f+ Ii+ w' �lb�p�wMMpwwv..++ r. Yw�I. wr�4' M�YM `AnKM-.�.A.n4M.WiYWiwwwrv..�... The National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils has developed criteria for hydric soils and a list of the Nation's hydric soils (USDA Soil Conservation Service 1987). However, the federal manual describes certain limitations (page 12 -13) for the National and State lists. Therefore, the SCS maintains a list of hydric soil map units for each county in the US. The list is used for z identifying which soils are hydric by the local soil series description. The current list of hydric = H soils for Pierce County is included in Appendix 3. Soil series descriptions from the 1976 ui [NRCS] Soil Survey of King County is included in Appendix 3. QQ = J U 00 By Hydrology: Cl) For the wetland hydrology determination, we use the presence of inundation and /or saturation for J = a sufficient "hydroperiod" to determine whether hydrology criteria are met. The depth to w freestanding water in a pit or soil probe hole must be less than 12" in wetland margins where w 0 hydric and upland soils and vegetation are transitional. Topographic elevations, encrusted detritus or debris, silt lines, hydraulic gradients, capillary fringe, or a drainage analysis of offsite g and onsite tributary areas are other means and indicators that may be used to help determine the N presence or absence of sufficient hydrology for a positive wetland determination. H W Z = After a wetland determination is made, the wetland area is analyzed to determine if it is a high • quality wetland or if it has any of several irreplaceable ecological functions. The wetland is then w O w analyzed for any significant habitat values such as size, classifications, plant species diversity, structural diversity, special habitat features, buffer conditions, and connection to streams or other 0 w habitat areas. o w D. WETLAND CLASSIFICATION 1— — �`o Wetlands identified by this study are classified using a hierarchical multi -level approach developed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service for their scientific classification system. The classification system is published in the report titled Classification of Wetlands and Deep Water P. H Habitats of the United States, FWSIOBS- 79/31, by Cowardin, et al. (December 1979). z The system of classification divisions is based on habitats that share the influence of similar hydrology, geomorphology, chemical, or biological factors. The wetland systems involved in the project site are generally limited to " palustrine" systems. Palustrine wetlands (these are the only wetlands identified by this study) are divided into classes and subclasses determined by dominant vegetation such as "emergent" (EM), "scrub - shrub" (SS) and /or forested' (FO), "aquatic bed" (AB), and /or "open water" (OW). Water regimes are assigned for each class based on the hydroperiod or duration of flooding (inundation) or saturation associated with the wetland area. These are defined for freshwater, non -tidal areas as follows: WATER REGIME MODIFIERS [NON- T1DAL] temporarily flooded (A): flooded (inundation by surface water) for brief periods during growing season but the water table is otherwise well below the soil surface saturated (B): substrate is saturated for an extended period during growing season but surface water is seldom present seasonally flooded (C): flooded for extended periods during the growing season, but usually no surface water by the end of the growing season seasonally flooded /well drained (D) seasonally flooded /saturated (E): flooded for periods, but usually saturated by groundwater at or near the surface thru most of the growing season Pitzer - Guillermo Property 13y John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 12 semipermanently flooded (F) flooded throughout growing season in most years, when surface water is absent, water table is at or near the surface intermittently exposed (G): flooded throughout year except in years of extreme drought permanently flooded (H): flooded (water covers land surface) throughout the year in all years intermittently flooded (J): surface is usually exposed with surface water present for variable periods with no seasonal pattern artificially flooded (K) intermittently flooded /temporary (W) saturated /semi - permanent/seasonal (Y) intermittently exposed /permanent (Z) unknown (U) SPECIAL MODIFIERS beaver (b) partially drained /ditched (d) farmed (f) diked /impounded (h) artificial substrate (r) spoil (s) excavated (x) The class of a particular wetland describes its general appearance in terms of either the dominant vegetation or the substrate. When over 30% cover by vegetation is present, a vegetation class is used (e.g., "emergent ", "scrub- shrub" and /or "forested"). When less than 30% of the substrate is covered by vegetation, then a substrate class is used (e.g., "unconsolidated bottom ", "aquatic bed ", or "moss- lichen "). Typical demarcations of these classes of palustrine wetland systems are shown in the Cowardin report. [Also reference is made to the current (1988) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map and legend.] Wetlands that have a single vegetation species that dominate 90% of the total wetland area are called a "mono- type ". This may occur where more than the one species is present but the total area of their coverage is less than 10 %. If another vegetation class or species dominates more than 10% of the wetland, then it has higher habitat diversity. This can be based on the number of plant species found in a class, the number and quality of the structural layers and the interspersion of classes which creates increased "edge effect" and habitat diversity. This may also result in a higher wetland "rating ". E. WETLAND REGULATION AND RATING STANDARDS The City of Tukwila has adopted standards for wetland designations (i.e. "classification" per Cowardin et al), ratings (i.e. "types ") and buffer requirements (i.e. "50 to 100 - feet ") by Ordinance #2074, effective December 2004. Wetlands are designated and rated for regulatory purposes using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's "Classification of Wetland and Deepwater Habitats of the Unites States FWS /OBS- 79/31" ( Cowardin et al., 1979) and the 3- tiered rating system specified by the City of Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Sensitive Areas Ordinance (SAO) found in Chapter 18.45, Wetland Designations, Ratings and Buffers (TMC 18.45.080). For a detailed description of the methodology used for wetland classifications, please refer to section D above. Pitzer - Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 13 WO The standards adopted by the TMC for rating and buffering wetlands are as follows: "B. WETLAND RATINGS — Wetlands shall be designated Type 1, Type 2 or Type 3 as listed below: 1. Tvpe 1 wetlands are those wetlands that meet any of the following criteria: a. The wetland is characterized by the presence of species listed by the federal government or State as endangered or threatened, or the presence of'critical or outstanding habitat for those species; b. The wetland has 40 -60% permanent open water in dispersed patches with two or more classes of vegetation; c. The wetland is equal to or greater than five acres in size and has three or more wetland classes, one of which may be substituted by permanent or open water; or d. The wetland is documented as regionally significant waterfowl or shorebird areas by the State Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2. Tvpe 2 wetlands are those wetlands that meet any of the following criteria: a. The wetland is equal to or greater than one acre in size; b. The wetland has three or more wetland classes and is less than 5 acres; c. The wetland is characterized by the presence of nesting sites for priority species as listed by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife; or d. The wetland is hydrologically connected (non - isolated) to a Type 1 or Type 2 watercourse. 3. Type 3 wetlands are those wetlands that are greater than 1,000 square feet and less than one acre in size with two or fewer wetland classes." "E. WETLAND BUFFER WIDTHS — The following standard buffers shall be established from the wetland edge: 1. Type 1 Wetland; 100 foot buffer 2. Type 2 Wetland; 80 foot buffer 3. Type 3 Wetland; 50 foot bier" Basically no regulated activities shall be permitted within a Type 1 wetland. Type 2 and 3 wetlands may be allowed to have some variation of standard buffer widths if the applicant can demonstrate on a case by case basis that a reduction in the standard width is necessary. The variation, or alteration of wetlands, shall be reviewed and approved by the Director in accordance with the provisions and conditions specified in the TMC 18.45.080 and TMC 18.45.090. The minimum threshold size for a Type 3 wetland is 1,000 square feet. If a wetland is hydrologically isolated, Type 3 and has a total cumulative area of less than 1,000 square feet, then it is exempt from the provisions of this chapter. Wetlands which are determined to Type 3 and more than 1,000 sq. ft. but less than 1 acre in size regardless of property lines, with 2 or fewer wetland classes, are required to have a standard 50 -foot buffer, plus a l0 -foot building setback line for residential development, measured horizontally from the wetland edge. Pitzer - Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 14 Pitzer- Guillermo Property John Comis Associates Date: 07 /08/05 John Comis Associates ee Field Sketch Map in this appendix an Figure 5 for test plot locations) ALL-WEATHER WRIT MG PAPER J. L. DARLING CORP. TACOMA, WA 98424-1017 www.RiteintheRain.com No. 312 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. ■ 7 ti • 16. fr -__ 4 `n+ f N I: 5 1. ‘ " "4 3 - v �, 111 P . , :. i r-J1 znki 0 011, y,_ vs 111 // 4,1 ' L. 1 i (2%. I _ [A.; (7 t it r. -;a4 I - Ir JL , .... •, - r 4 _ _____ tiii ALL-WEATHER WRIT MG PAPER J. L. DARLING CORP. TACOMA, WA 98424-1017 www.RiteintheRain.com No. 312 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. ■ 150 , T1 *r$5*. O LTC te 1.4k5w firts kAstric 1.41c S g1S c-ev %lora rt*I 5 wayint_ p‘4,44,,P144-4 hik Writicius az: rturA0K1 S-r*Noe g m t4t•-.t: I 4- Arv■ P rc r/Etlex-we. oo 000401 el ci‘e$04)-11, 04.5 4 JAL, 041..iNu.-ri-not4 1 A-rp m (et-Arc 4.4.0.,04-tr7Q) _ 0 , y • .rat' • • ,•• • •••* • • • A. sA c4awe,..„, Ira viz 44,ST't cp. SATvrtirroThl %Tv stitr 1:::400N4 • HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? Yes No ❑ Water Marks? Yes ❑ No ❑ Sediment Deposits? Yes ❑ No Based on: Time of year Feb 2005 Drift Lines? Yes ❑ No ❑ Drainage Patterns? Yes ❑ No Because of warm temps plants were already growing (budding). Oxidized root (live) channels? < 12" deep? Yes ❑ No ❑ Local Soil Survey? Yes ❑ No Depth of Inundation: 0 Inches. Water Stained Leaves? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth to Free Water in Pit: none FAC Neutral? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth to Saturated Soil: saturation a, Other? surface FIELD DATA FORM Routine Onsite Wetland Determination (1997 WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Guillermo SFR Cad Tukwila Date: 215105 Applicant/Owner: Jim Pitzer Jr., Pitzer Homes County /Jurisdiction: King State: WA S/T /R: NE1 /4 of 22- 23N-4E JCA Job No: 050127 Transect ID: Plot ID: TP1 Investigator: John G. Comis (PWS) Ca? John Comis Associates Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes® No❑ Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes❑ No Is the area a potential problem area? Yes❑ No® Location: in the wetland just south of the property line. VEGETATION (Dominant Plant Species) Dominant plant species 1. nightshade, black 2 _skunk cabbage 3. stinging nettle 4. horsetail, giant 5. water - parsley (Scientific Name) (Solanum nigrum) (Lysichitum americanum) ((Mica dioica) (Equisetum telmateia) (Oenanthe sarmentosa) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: % of Dominants (OBL, FACW, FAC): 80 % Check all indicators that apply below: Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Rationale for decision /Remarks: Dominants are hydrophytes Indicator Status FACU OBL FAC+ FACW OBL Stratum forb, ann forb, per forb, per forb, per H2 forb, per Submrg Regional Knowledge of Plant Communities X . Physiological or reproductive adaptations Technical Literature X . Other Wetland Plant List (Nat'l or Regional) X . Morphological adaptations Wetland Plant Data Base X Check all that apply and explain below: Stream, Lake or Gage Data: . Aerial Photograph: X . Other: County drainage maps . Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Rationale for decision /Remarks: Hydrology appears to be sufficient for a positive wetland determination. Saturation is present at time of February site visit. High soil moisture. ... r...+ ii.. il+.+.:::!' rti •+ i�?: tL:. Ld': i.tGl�ua`+4.Kt{CW.7:y.C.•+1liYW tISIVAL Yes No Histosol: Mottle abundance, size and contrast ❑Yes No Concretions: ❑ Yes No Histic Epipedon: ❑Yes No High Organic Content in Surface Layer or Sandy Soils ❑Yes No Sulfidic Odor: ❑Yes No Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑Yes No Aquic Moisture ❑Yes No Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Regime ❑Yes No Reducing ❑Yes No Listed on National Hydric Soils List Conditions: ❑Yes No Gleyed or Low ❑Yes No Other(explain in remarks) Chroma Colors: Depth (Inches) Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell, moistened) Mottle abundance, size and contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc. Drawing of Soil Profile (match description) 0 -12" 10yr211 SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Tukwila Muck Taxonomy(subgroup): Hydrologic Soil Group (drainage class): Field observations confirm Soil Survey Mapped type? Yes No X . Profile Description Hvdric Soil Indicators (check all that a Hydric Soil Present? Yes Q9 No LJ Rationale for decision /Remarks: Matrix color is present to indicate hydric soil, also shallow root zone and VERY high soil moisture indicates a hydric condition in the upper 6 to 12" of the soil horizon; a histosol and appears to be saturation for lonq durations I WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yesg No ❑ Is the sampling point within a wetland? Yes No ❑ Hydric Soils Present? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Rationale /Remarks: All of the three meet criteria. TP1 : :�rt�::1S^nMnA:+drf'!h'isd tiff. Y!' l/ Y. IdW :: 'i z • z et U " 1 2 6 -J C.) U O • o Co Ili J = H • u- W = I--w Z = I- O Z ~ U � O - (12 o '- ww • 0 LI O z U= O z HYDROLOGY Is it the growing season? Yes ►i1 No ❑ Water Marks? Yes ❑ No ❑ Sediment Deposits? Yes ❑ No■ Based on: Time of year Feb 2005 Drift Lines? Yes ❑ No ❑ Drainage Patterns? Yes ❑ No Because of warm temps plants were already growing (budding). Oxidized root (live) channels? < 12" deep? Yes ❑ No ❑ Local Soil Survey? Yes ❑ No Depth of Inundation: 0 Inches Water Stained Leaves? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth to Free Water in Pit: none FAC Neutral? Yes ❑ No ❑ Depth to Saturated Soil: sat ( bottom (15 ") Other? FIELD DATA FORM Routine Onsite Wetland Determination (1997 WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual) Project/Site: Guillermo SFR Cad Tukwila Date: 215/05 Applicant/Owner: Jim Pitzer Jr., Pitzer Homes County /Jurisdiction: King State: WA Investigator: John G. Comis (PWS) Ca? John Comis Associates S/T /R: NE1 /4 of 22- 23N-4E Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes Noll] JCA Job No: 050127 Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? YesO No❑ Transect ID: Is the area a potential problem area? Yes❑ No Plot ID: TP2 Location: north of the edge of Wetland A along the hillside between A4 and A5. I. VEGETATION (Dominant Plant Species) (Scientific Name) (Acer macrophyllum) (Rubus discolor) (Rubus ursinus) (Polysticum munitum) (Sambucus racemosa ssp. pubens) (Oemleria cerasiformis) (Corylus comuta) (Ilex angustifolia) Dominant plant species 1. maple, big leaf 2 ..blackberry, Himalayan 3. blackberry, pacific 4. fern, western sword 5. elderberry, red 6 _Indian plum 7. hazelnut, beaked 8. holly, English Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: % of Dominants (OBL, FACW, FAC): 0 % Check all indicators that apply below: Indicator Status FACU FACU FACU FACU FACU FACU FACU NI(UPL) Stratum tree woody vine, Intro woody vine PNF shrub shrub shrub shrub Regional Knowledge of Plant Communities X . Wetland Plant List (Nat'l or Regional) X . Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations Technical Literature X . Wetland Plant Data Base Other Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision /Remarks: Dominants are not hydrophytes X Check all that apply and explain below: Stream, Lake or Gage Data: Aerial Photograph: X . Other: County drainage maps _. Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision /Remarks: Hydrology does not appear to be sufficient for a positive wetland determination. No saturation is present and bottom of hole is dry at time of February site visit. Other field indicators such as encrusted detritus or blackened or matted leaves were not present. Yes No Histosol: Mottle abundance, size and contrast ❑Yes No Concretions: ■ Yes No Histic Epipedon: faint ❑Yes No High Organic Content in Surface Layer or 10yr313 Sandy Soils ❑Yes No Sulfidic Odor: ❑Yes No Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑Yes No Aquic Moisture ❑Yes No Listed on Local Hydric Soils List Regime ❑Yes No Reducing ❑Yes No Listed on National Hydric Soils List Conditions: ❑Yes No Gleyed or Low ❑Yes No Other(explain in remarks) Chroma Colors: Depth (Inches) Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell, moistened) Mottle abundance, size and contrast Texture, concretions, structure, etc. Drawing of Soil Profile (match description) 0 -7" 10yr212 faint 7 -15 "- 10yr313 SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Alderwood, gravelly sandy loam Taxonomy(subgroup): Hydrologic Soil Group (drainage class): Field observations confirm Soil Survey Mapped type? Yes X No_ Profile Description Hydric Soil Indicators (check all that appl Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision /Remarks: Matrix color and prominent or strong mottles are not present to indicate hydric soil, also deep root zone and low soil moisture indicates a non - hydric condition in the upper 10 to 12" of soil horizon. WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes❑ No Hydric Soils Present? Yes ❑ No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No El Rationale /Remarks: None of 3 criteria (vegetation, soils and hydrology) are met Is the sampling point within a wetland? Yes❑ No El TP2 I1:: :er*Laa4c...w- wrw:ti1,:.d•c...a: ■■ ,.Ke as nt,Diuyr;.:kt �:,'twW �wC. .� ,44 .4 SURVEY REPORT TACHMENTS S oil Descriptions and List of H dric Soil Map Units) ource USDA SCS "Soil Survey of King County, Washington ' , 1973 N ote: The Attachments included with this appendix are taken from the soil survey published Feb ruary 1979.'. The soil descriptions included in this appendix are indicated on the SCS Soil Su rvey map within or near this site area These are indicated on the soil survey map (see legend on Figure 3): Other soil types may also occur as inclusions within a mapped area The soils that w e' found within the site appear to be the same as those shown on the mapped. Itzer- Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 z W cc 6 U 00 CO Ill coo F- U) LL W 2 g Q cn = d Z = H I— O Z I- U 0 O - O H ww "- z w U = O Z Alderwood Series The Alderwood series is made up of moderately well drained soils that have a weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated substratum at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. These soils are on uplands. They formed under conifers, in glacial deposits. Slopes are 0 to 70 percent. The annual precipitation is 35 to 60 inches, most of which is rainfall, between October and May. The mean annual air temperature is about 50 F. The frost -free season is 150 tci 200 days. Elevation ranges from 100 to 800 feet. In a representative profile, the surface layer and subsoil are very dark brown, dark - brown, and grayish -brown gravelly sandy loam about 27 inches thick. The substratum is grayish - brown, weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated glacial till that extends to a depth of 60 inches and more. Alderwood soils are used for timber, pasture berries, row crops, and urban development. They are the most extensive soils in the survey are. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes (AM.—This soil is rolling. Areas are irregular in shape and range from 10 to about 600 acres in size. Representative profile of Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes, in woodland, 450 feet east and 1,300 feet south of the north quarter corner of sec. 15, T. 24 N., R. 6 E.: A1- -0 to 2 inches, very dark brown (10YR 2/2) gravelly sandy loam, dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) dry; weak, fine, granular struc- ture; slightly hard, friable, nonsticky, nonplastic; many roots; strongly acid; abrupt, wavy boundary. 1 to 3 inches thick. B2 - -2 to 12 inches, dark -brown (10YR 4/3) gravelly sandy loam, brown (10YR 5/3) dry; moderate, medium, subangular blocky structure; slightl hard, friable, nonsticky, nonplastic; many roots; strongly acid; clear, wavy boundary. 9 to 14 inches thick. B3 - -12 to 27 inches, grayish -brown (2.5Y 5/2) gravelly sandy loam, light gray (2.5Y 7/2) dry; many, medium, distinct mottles of light olive brown (2.5Y 5/6); hard, friable, non- sticky, nonplastic; many roots; medium acid; abrupt, wavy boundary. 12 to 23 inches thic: IIC - -27 to 60 inches, grayish -brown (2.SY 5/2), weakly to strongly consolidated till, light gray (2.5Y 7/2) dry; common, medium, distinc ' mottles of light olive brown and yellowish brown (2.5Y 5/6 and 10YR 5/6); massive; no roots; medium acid. Many feet thick. The A horizon ranges from very dark brown to dark brown. The B horizon is dark brown, grayish brown, and dark yellowish brown. The consolidated C horizon, at a depth of 24 to 40 inches, is mostl: grayish brown mottled with yellowish brown. Some layers in the C horizon slake in water. In a few areas, there is a thin, gray or grayish -brown A2 horizon. In most areas, this horizon has been destroyed through logging operations. Soils included with this soil in mapping make ul no more than 30 percent of the total acreage. Some areas are up to 3 percent the poorly y k jAed NNor a aeilingham, Se Tukw' a, and ahalaax sorts; some are up to 5 percent the very_gravelly Fverett and Neiltop soils; and some are up to 15 percent Alderwood soils that have slopes more gentle or steeper than 6 to 15 percent. Some areas in New- castle Hills are 25 percent Beausite soils, some northeast of Duvall are as much as 25 percent Oval: soils, and some in the vicinity of Dash Point are 10 percent Indianola and Kitsap soils. Also included are small areas of Alderwood soils that have a gravelly loam surface layer and subsoil. Permeability is moderately rapid in the surface layer and subsoil and very slow in the substratum. Roots penetrate easily to the consolidated substra- tum where they tend to mat on the surface. Some roots enter the substratum through cracks. Water moves on top of the substratum in winter. Available water capacity is low. Runoff is slow to medium, and the hazard of erosion is moderate. This soil is used for timber, pasture, berries, and row crops, and for urban development. Capability unit IVe -2; woodland group 3d1. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes N19.--This soil is nearly level and undulatiT17 It is similar to Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes, but in places its surface layer is 2 to 3 inches thicker. Areas are•irregular in shape and range from 10 acres to slightly•more than 600 acres in size. Some areas are as much as 15 percent included Norma, Bellingham, Tukwila, and Shalcar soils, all of which are poorly drained; and some areas in the vicinity of Enumclaw are as much as 10 percent Buckley soils. Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight. This Alderwood soil is used for timber, pasture, berries, and row crops, and for urban development. Capability unit IVe -2; woodland group 3d2. Alderwood gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes A D .- -Depth to the substratum in this soil varies WITRIn short distances, but is commonly about 40 inches. Areas are elongated and range from 7 to about 250 acres in size. Soils included with this soil in mapping make up no more than 30 percent of the total acreage. Some areas are up to 25 percent Everett soils that have slopes of 15 to 30 percent, and some areas are up to 2 percent Bellingham, Norma, and Seattle soils, which are in depressions. Some areas, especially on Squak Mountain, in Newcastle Hills, and north of Tiger Mountain, are 25 percent Beausite and Ovall soils. Beausite soils are underlain by sandstone, and Ovall soils by andesite. Runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is severe. The slippage potential is moderate. This Alderwood soil is used mostly for timber. Some areas on the lower parts of slopes are used for pasture. Capability unit VIe -2; woodland group 3d1. Alderwood and Kitsap soils, very steep 011).-- This mapping unit is about 50 percent Alderwoo gravelly sandy loam and 25 percent Kitsap silt loam. Slopes are 25 to 70 percent. 'distribution of the soils varies greatly within short distances. About 15 percent of some mapped areas is ant included, unnamed, very deep, moderately coarse textured soil; and about 10 percent of some areas is a very deep, coarse - textured Indianola soil. Drainage and permeability vary. Runoff is rapid to very rapid, and the erosion hazard is severe to very severe. The slippage potential is severe. These soils are used for timber. Capability unit VIIe -1; woodland group 2d1. Z = Z c W 0 0 OA co ill H W W o I1_? op -±a = W F- Z � I— 0 Z F— W U� 0 N c) f- W W W U _N 0 F- Z Arents, Alderwood Material Arents, Alderwood material consists of Alderwood soils that have been so disturbed through urban` ization that they no longer can be classified with the Alderwood series. These soils, howevem, have many similar features. The upper part of the soil, to a depth of 20 to 40 inches, is brown to dark - brown gravelly sandy loam. Below this is a grayish - brown, consolidated and impervious substratum. Slopes generally range from 0 to 15 percent. These soils are used for urban development. Arents, Alderwood material. 0 to 6 percent slopes 442,111.--In many areas this soil is level, as a result of shaping during construction for urban facilities. Areas are rectangular in shape and range from 5 acres to about 400 acres in size. Representative profile of Arents, Alderwood material, 0 to 6 percent slopes, in an urban area, 1,300 feet west and 350 feet south of the northeast corner of sec. 23, T. 25 N., R. 5 E.: 0 to 26 inches, dark -brown (10YR 4/3) gravelly sandy loam, pale brown (10YR 6/3) dry; massive; slightly hard, very friable, non - sticky, nonplastic; many roots; medium acid; abrupt, smooth boundary. 23 to 29 inches thick. 26 to 60 inches, grayish -brown (2.SY 5/2) weakly consolidated to strongly consolidated glacial till, light brownish gray (2.SY 6/2) dry; common, medium, prominent mottles of yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) moist; massive; no roots; medium acid. Many feet thick, The upper, very friable part of the soil extends to a depth of 20 to 40 inches and ranges from dark grayish brown to dark yellowish brown. Some areas are up to 30 percent included soils that are similar to this soil material, but either shallower or deeper over the compact substratum; and some areas are 5 to 10 percent very gravelly Everett soils and sandy Indianola soils. This Arents, Alderwood soil is moderately well drained. Permeability in the upper, disturbed soil material is moderately rapid to moderately slow, depending on its compaction during construction. The substratum is very slowly permeable. Roots penetrate to and tend to mat on the surface of the consolidated substratum. Some roots enter the substratum through cracks. Water moves on top of the substratum in winter. Available water capacity is low. Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil is used for urban development. Ca- pability unit IVe -2; woodland group 3d2. Arents, Alderwood material, 6 to 15 percent slopes (AmC . - -This soil has convex slopes. Areas are recflETUlar in shape and range from 10 acres to about 450 acres in size. Some areas arc up to 30 included soils that are similar to this soil material, but either shallower or deeper over the compact substratum; and some areas are 5 to 10 percent very gravelly Everett soils and sandy Indianola soils. Runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is noderate to severe. This soil is used for urban development. Ca- pability unit IVe -2; woodland group 3d2. Norma Series The Norma series is made up of on drained soils that formed in alluvium, un er se ges, grass, conifers, and hardwoods. These soils are in basins on the laciated uplands and in areas along i e -- stream bottoms. dopes are 0 to 2 percent. The annual precipitation is 35 to 60 inches, and the mean annual air temperature is about 50 F. The frost -free season is 150 to 200 days. Elevation ranges from about sea level to 600 feet. In a representative profile, the surface layer is black sandy loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is dark grayish -brown and dark -gray sandy loam and extends to a depth of 60 inches or more. Norma soils are used mainly for pasture. If drained, they are used for row crops. Norma sandy loam 02).--This soil occurs as strips 25 to 300 feet wide.""57opes are less than 2 percent. Areas are level or concave and range from 1 to about 100 acres in size. Representative profile of Norma sandy loam, in a pasture, 725 feet east and 50 feet north of the south quarter corner of sec. 31, T. 20 N., R. 7 E.: Ap - -0 to 10 inches, black (10YR 2/1) sandy loam, dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) dry; moderate, fine, granular structure; slightly hard, very friable, slightly sticky, slightly plastic; many roots; slightly acid; abrupt, smooth boundary. 10 to 12 inches thick.. - -10 to 30 inches, dark grayish -brown (2.5Y 4/2) sandy loam, light brownish gray (2.5Y 6/2) dry; many, medium, prominent, yellowish -red (SYR 4/8) and brown (7.SYR 4/4) mottles, very pale brown (IOYR 7/4) and reddish yellow (7.5YR 6/8) dry; thin platy structure; hard, very friable, nonsticky, nonplastic; few roots; slightly acid; clear, wavy boundary. 19 to 24 inches thick. B22g - -30 to 60 inches, dark -gray (SY 4/1) sandy loam, light gray (5Y 7/1) dry; common, fine, prominent, strong -brown (7.SYR 5 /6) and reddish- yellow (7.SYR 6/6) mottles, yellowish brown (10YR S /8) and pale brown (2.5Y 7/4) dry; massive; slightly hard, very friable, nonsticky, nonplastic; few roots; slightly acid. The A horizon ranges from black to very dark brown and is as much as 1S percent gravel. The B horizon commonly is sandy loam that in places is stratified with silt loam and loamy sand. It is as much as 35 percent gravel in some places. The B horizon is mottled gray, dark gray, and dark grayish brown. Some areas are up to 5 percent included Seattle, Tukwila, and Shalcar soils; and some are up to 5 percent Alderwood and Everett soils, at the slightly higher elevations. In the area northwest of Auburn, in the Green River Valley, there are areas of Norma soils that have an organic surface layer as thick as 7 'nches in some places. Also included are small s s of Norma soils that have a silt loam surface layer. Permeability is moderately rapid. The seasonal water table is at or near the surface. In drained areas, the effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. In undrained areas, rooting depth is restrict- ed. The available water capacity is moderately high to high. Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight. Stream overflow is a severe hazard in places. This soil is used mostly for pasture. Drained areas are used for row crops. Capability unit IIIw -3; woodland group 3w2. z c 6 U O 00 C J WO J IL = W F— O W ~ uj 0 0— 0 F— W - O .• W U= 0 z Bellingham Series The Bellingham series is made up of poorly drained soils that formed in alluvium, under grass and sedges. These soils are nearly level and are mostly in depressions on the upland glacial till plain. The annual precipitation is 35 to 55 inches, and the mean annual air temperature is about 50 F. The frost -free season ranges from 150 to 200 days. Elevation ranges from about sea level to S00 feet. In a representative profile the surface layer is very dark brown silt loam about 11 inches thick. The subsoil is mottled gray silty clay loam about 49 inches thick. Bellingham soils are used chiefly for pasture and occasionally for row crops. Bellingham silt loam (W.- -Areas of this soil are somewhat rounded and elongated and range from 1 to 40 acres in size. Slopes are less than 2 per- cent. Representative profile of Bellingham silt loam, in pasture, 600 feet north and 650 feet east of the south quarter corner of sec. 10, T. 24 N., R. 6 E.: Ap - -O to 11 inches, very dark brown (10YR 2/2) silt loam, grayish brown (10YR 5/2) dry; common, fine, distinct mottles, brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) dry; moderate, medium, crumb struc- ture; hard, friable, slightly sticky, slightly plastic; many roots; medium acid; abrupt, smooth boundary. 12 to 20 inches thick. B1 - -11 to 14 inches, olive -gray (SY 5/2) loamy sand, light gray (SY 7/2) dry; massive; hard, very friable, nonsticky, nonplastic; common roots; medi}un acid; clear, smooth boundary. 0 to 3 inches thick. B2g - -14 to 60 inches, gray (N 5/0) silty clay loam; many, medium and large, prominent, strong - brown mottles, light gray (5Y 7/1) and yellow (10YR 7/8) dry; massive; hard, firm, sticky, plastic; few roots; neutral. The A horizon ranges from black to very dark grayish brown. The B horizon is grayish brown, olive gray, or gray. It is mostly silty clay loam. and heavy silt loam. There are a few thin layers of loamy sand and sandy loam. Included in mapping were small areas of Alder - wood, Everett, and Seattle soils. Total inclusions do not exceed 15 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is slow. In drained areas, roots penetrate to a depth of 60 inches and more. In undrained areas, effective rooting depth is restric- ted because the seasonal water table is near the surface during the rainy season. The available water capacity is high. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of erosion is slight. This soil is used mostly for pasture. A few areas are used for row crops. Capability unit IIIw -2; woodland group 3w2. Z Z �. Br g 6 U O 0 • c J H uJ 00 g J u Q co I � Z = ' ZO W U � 0— C1 F- WW 11. 111 co = 0 z Tukwila Series The Tukwila series is made up of very poorly draine•i organic soils that formed in decomposing sedges, rushes, grasses, and shrubs. These soils are in wet basins of upland depressions and on stream bottoms. Slopes are 0 to 1 percent. The annual precipitation ranges from 35 to 80 inches, and the mean annual temperature is about 50' F. The frost - free season is 150 to 200 days. Elevation ranges from 25 to 750 feet. In a representative profile, dominantly black to very dark brown muck extends to a depth of 60 inches or more. If drained, Tukwila soils are used for row crops. They are also used for pasture. Tukwila muck (Tu).- -'This nearly level soil is in nearly circular and elongated areas that range from 1 to about 60 acres in size. Slopes are less than 1 percent. Representative profile of Tukwila muck, in pas- ture, 320 feet west and 1,140 feet south of the center of sec. 4, T. 21 N., R. 5 E.: Oal - -O to 10 inches, black (10YR 2/1) muck, dark gray (10YR 4/1) dry; moderate, coarse, granu- lar structure; slightly hard, very friable, slightly sticky, slightly plastic; many roots; extremely acid; abrupt, smooth boundary. 8 to 12 inches thick. 0a2 - -10 to 16 inches, black (10YR 2/1) muck, brown (10YR 5/3) dry; ped exterior is dark gray (10YR 4/1) dry; moderate, very coarse, pris- matic structure; slightly hard, friable, slightly sticky, slightly plastic; many roots; very strongly acid; clear, smooth boundary. 6 . to 9 inches thick. 0a3 - -16 to 19 inches, black (10YR 2/1) muck, dark brown (10YR 3/3) dry grading to pale brown (10YR 6/3) in lower part; dark reddish -brown (5YR 3/3) ped interior; moderate, very coarse, prismatic structure; slightly hard, friable, slightly sticky, slightly plastic; many roots; very strongly acid; abrupt, wavy boundary. 2 to 4 inches thick. i - -19 to 21 inches, strong -brown (7.5YR 5/6) and • very pale brown (10YR 7/3) silt loam (dia- tomite), light yellowish brown (10YR 6/4) dry; passive; slightly hard, very friable, non - sticky, nonplastic; any roots; very strongly acid; abrupt, smooth boundary. 1 to 3 inches thick. 0a4 - -21 to 60 inches, very dark brown (10YR 2/2) muck that is 5 to 10 percent woody stems, dark brown (10YR 2/2) dry; massive; slightly hard, very friable, slightly sticky, slightly plas- tic; common roots to a depth of 30 inches, few roots below; very strongly acid. Several feet thick. The underlying organic layers are strong -brown to very dark brown muck, peaty muck, and in places layers of diatomite 1 to 10 inches thick. Some areas of this soil are up to 30 or 40 per- cent Seattle soils; and some are up to 5 percent the poorly drained Bellingham and Norma soils. Permeability is moderate. There is a seasonal high water table at or near the surface. If the water table is controlled, the effective rooting depth is 60 inches CT more. In undrained areas, rooting depth is restricted. Available water capac- ity is high. Runoff is ponded, and the erosion hazard is slight._ If drained, this soil is used for row crops. It is also used for pasture. Capability unit.IIw -3; no woodland classification. S: RATING FO Completed by John Comis Associates Washington State Department of Ecology, "Washington State Wetlands Ratin System, Western Washington ", August 2004) ote that ratings (or categorizations) of wetlands are based on a 3- tiered system by TMC 45 080 B for regulatory purposes.: The WDOE Rating Form is completed by. JCA as i aid to support the recommended wetland rating that may be approved by City of ukwila'for applicable buffer standards and setback requirements. Pitzer- Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates. Date: 07 /08/05 P'. If 110;t14 NeedS - " dial .1totec„ 4yy,; '.. Liciiitfe�1nli ftfl ngS. :f4l;? ? = ±' r .; ='k,; ... . t ; $ SP I. Has the wetland been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered plant or animal species (TIE species)? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state or federal database. Depressional Lake -fringe Slope + Lake - fringe SP2. Has the wetland been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered plant or animal species? For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the appropriate state database. Depressional Depressional Treat as ESTUARINE under wetlands with special characteristics Depressional + Lake - fringe SP3. Does the wetland contain individuals of Priority species listed by the iFDFiW for the state? Riverine / V SP4. Does the wetland have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as having special significance. k. ' UGH Clrii iii: lWkfiuri )iVeltnearedRtileindBouiiday' :*.'' i ,Clhii'ro'UsitoRarinr.'i\? +1;'t Riverine Slope + Riverine Slope + Depressional Depressional Lake -fringe Slope + Lake - fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Depressional Treat as ESTUARINE under wetlands with special characteristics Depressional + Lake - fringe Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Wiilaid TYPi ;ti. `t:•1y ;�:i.ee2 a: ;g °=' i.Wetliad Cblld',"', . Estuarine Depressional Natural Heritage Welland Riverine Bog Like- fringe 1/ Mature Forest Slope Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal laterdunal None of the above DRAFT WETLAND RATING FORM - WESTERN WASHINGTON Does the wetland being rated meet any of the criteria below? ,� t I If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland Name of wetland (if known): C -rLA �o tf 1 =tilt ` r+s U it,� A rt according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland. Location: SEC: WNSH W(attach map with outline of wetland to rating �� or Person(s) Rating Wetland: '.1 i t"i) S Affiliation: Vx-19 Date of site visit: 21,10 'O is Category based on FUNCTIONS aided by wetland I H IiI IVJ Category I Score >70 Category II - Score 51.69 Category Ill - Score 30.50 Category IV - Score <30 , DRAFT SUMMARY OF RATING Score for Water Quality Functions Score for Hydrologic Functions Score for Habitat Functions TOTAL score for functions Category based on SPECIAL CIIARA5FERiSTiCS of wetland I H Does not Apply Final Category (choose the "highest" category from above) Check the appropriate type and class of wetland being rated. Wetland Rating Form- westan Washington a 6640 sCe August 2004 Classification � o . of Vegetated W tlands for Western Washington Watlaad W : Atd Oate: � vets 1. a•" s ts in the wetland usually controlled by tides (i.e. excep during floods)? YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO -Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) !/your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. Ili! is Saltwater lldal Fringe it Or rated as an Estuarine wetland Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation Is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category 1 and If estuarine wetlands have changed (see p. ). 2. Is within the wetland flat and precipitation is only source ( >90%) of water to it. NO - go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the wetland meet both of the following criteria? The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores ofa body of open water (without any vegetation on the surface) where at least 20 acres (8 ha) are permanently inundated (ponded or flooded); least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)? YES -The wetland class is Lake -fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the w meet an of the following criteria? r e wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual), 4 water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as ahcetflow, or in a swale without distinct b e water leaves the wetland without being Impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these ope of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks( depressions are usually <in diameter and less than I oat dee . NO • go to 5 Ca- Thewetlan class is Slope 5. Is the wetland in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding front that streams or river? The flooding should occur at least once every two years, on the average, to answer "yes." The wetland can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO • go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine Wetland Rating Form — woman Washington August 2004 z.) To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the flydrogeomorphic Class oldie wetland being rated. The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class ofa wetland can be determined using the key below. See p.24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. Wetland Rating Form— western Washington 2 Augurs 2004 6.1s the wetland in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time of the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland NO -go to 7 YES -The wetland class is Depressional 7. Is the wetland located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no stream or river running through it and providing water. The wetland seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO- go to 8 YES -The wetland class is Depressional I. Your wetland seems to be difficult to classify. For example, seeps at the base ofa slope may grade into a rverine floodplain, or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. Sometimes we find characteristics of several different hydrogeomorphic classes within one wetland boundary. Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland being rated. If the area of the second class is less than I0% classify the wetland using the first class. If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Wetland Rating Form — westan Washington 4 August 2004 Z Z re W 6 O 0 c U) 111 J F- CO Li_ lL 0 I O N o 1- 0 /1 O •• 0 H O Z .. .s......:.:t a.k., \ ......\.n- „aa5.maa+i. G, r� .., t:i �L. �r :.;),.�.k.titl�:�c +.tv'N.•.41r .r F•i v la:i 1D i;Depr2ssional and Flats Wtttaads' . ; j WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS • ind ators that wetland functions to improve water quality y - D D 1. Does the wetland have the pot Hai to improve water quality? (seep. 38) (seep. 54) D D D D D D 1.1 Characteristics of surface • ester flows out of the wetland: Wetland is a depression wit no surface water outlet points = 3 Wetland has an lnterminen y flowing, or highly constricted, outlet points = 2 Wetland has an unconstric d surface outlet points = I Wetland Is flat and has no •bvious outlet and/or outlet is a ditch points = I R 1.1 Area of surface depressions wi in the riverine wetland that can trap sediments during a flooding event Depressions cover >3/4 area • wetland points = 8 Depressions cover > 1/2 area (wetland points =4 Depressions present but cove < 12 area of wetland point =2 No depressions present points = 0 D 1.2 The soil 2 inches bel • the surface is clay, organic, or smells anoxic (hydrogen sulfide or roll • eggs). YES points = 4 NO points = 0 R 3.2 Characteristics of vegetation I t slow down water velocities during floods: Treat large woody debris an fores • r shrub". Choose the points appropriate for the best description. Forest or shrub for >1/3 area OR Emerg •t plants >2/3area points =7 Forest or shrub for> I /10 area OR Emerg t plants > 1/3 area points • 4 Vegetation does not meet above criteria points ■ 0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persis nt vegetation (emergent, shrub, and/or forest class): Wetland has persistent,un: • d, vegetation > = 95% ofarea points =5 Wetland has persistent, ungraz -. vegetation > = 1/2 °Carea points ■ 3 Wetland has persistent, ungrazed •etation> =1/10 of area points =I Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vest lion <1 /10 of area points =0 R D1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding • inundation. This is the area of the wetland that Upon . , for at least 1 months, but dries out sometime during the year. Do not count the • a that is permanently ponded. Estimate area as the average condition 5 out o 0 yrs. Area seasonally ponded Is > Ve total area of wet • point = 4 Area seasonally ponded is > t/. total area of well nd point = 2 Area seasonally ponded is <V. total area of wet! • points = 0 NOTE: See text for indicators ofseasonaland pe anent inundation. R R Total for D I Ad the points in the boxes above R 4.Does the wetland have the opportunity to • uce flooding and erosion? D D D 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to im : rove water quality? (seep. 44) multiplier — Answer YES if you know or believe there are • • Mutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would • raise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradim rout the wetland? Note which of the following conditions provide the sources . pollutants. — Grazing in the wetland or within 0 ft — Untreated stormwater discharg to wetland — Tilled fields or orchards with 150 ft of wetland — A stream or culvert dischar• - into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas, farmed f • s, roads, or clear-cut logging — Residential, urban areas, : olf courses are within ISO ft of wetland — Wetland is fed by grou • water high in phosphorus or nitrogen — Other YES multiplier is 2 0 multiplier is 1 TOTAL - hydrologic unctions Multiply the score from R 3 by R 4 Add score to table on p. I TOTAL - Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from DI by D2 Add score to table on p. I vjRiV! .:4 ,', - . c .. ...,-, liwatei;fiiaai ; Hoge ;WR,IiilltiS:r ?�Cy ' y'i'fi�f�0Ult3•' ,,: % HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS - • motors that wetland functions to reduce . flooding and stream erosio • • y - '' :: �`..: R 3. Does the wetland have : e potential to reduce flooding and erosion? (seep. 54) R R 3.1 Characteristics of e overbank storage the wetland provides: Estimate the avemg width of the wetland perpendicular to the direction of the flow and the width •: the stream or riser channel (distance between banks). Calculate the ratio:. width of wetland) /( width ofstream). if the ratio ismoreth 20 points =9 If the ratio isbetween t -20 points =6 If the ratio is 5- <10 points =4 If the ratio is I- <5 points = 2 if the ratio is < 1 points ■ 1 R 1.1 Area of surface depressions wi in the riverine wetland that can trap sediments during a flooding event Depressions cover >3/4 area • wetland points = 8 Depressions cover > 1/2 area (wetland points =4 Depressions present but cove < 12 area of wetland point =2 No depressions present points = 0 R R 3.2 Characteristics of vegetation I t slow down water velocities during floods: Treat large woody debris an fores • r shrub". Choose the points appropriate for the best description. Forest or shrub for >1/3 area OR Emerg •t plants >2/3area points =7 Forest or shrub for> I /10 area OR Emerg t plants > 1/3 area points • 4 Vegetation does not meet above criteria points ■ 0 R dd the points in the boxes above R R R R 4.Does the wetland have the opportunity to • uce flooding and erosion? multiplier (seep. 57) Answer YES lithe wetland is in a location I. the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity, it p ' ides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flood' g or excessive and/or erosive flows. Note which of the following conditions a ly. — There are human structures and ivities downstream (roads, buildings, bridges, farms) that can be dam •ed by flooding. — There are natural resources do nstrcam (e.g. salmon redds) that can be damaged by flooding — Other (Answer NO if the major source of wa • r to the wetland is controlled by a reservoir or the wetland is tidal fringe ado • the sides of a dike) YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is l TOTAL - Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from R I by R 2 R TOTAL - hydrologic unctions Multiply the score from R 3 by R 4 Add score to table on p. I 'Y e b, �.! '' IRe "u'It . 'F(CSt. , tYXtfOr `l�' ri e' �vrf :e: X,d s i �: .r � i t . ✓. s -.1-1.- . .t•i5 •�. j re. '' :: �`..: -^: WATER QUALIT FUNCTIONS - indi ors that wetla functions to improve water quality 0 x a al R I. Does the wetlaad have the potent h to improve water quality? (seep. 50) R 1.1 Area of surface depressions wi in the riverine wetland that can trap sediments during a flooding event Depressions cover >3/4 area • wetland points = 8 Depressions cover > 1/2 area (wetland points =4 Depressions present but cove < 12 area of wetland point =2 No depressions present points = 0 R 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetatio in the wetland: Forest or shrub > 2/3 the area of wetland points ■ 8 Forest or shmb > 1/3 area of the we d points = 6 Ungrazed, emergent plants > 2/3 area • wetland points • 6 Ungrazed emergent plants > 1/3 area o elland points =3 Forest, shrub, and ungrazed emergent < I ma of wetland points = 0 A• tie points in the boxes above R R R 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to Impro water quality? (seep. 53) multiplier Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollu • is in groundwater or surface water coming Into the wetland that would otherwise • duce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from th. wetland? Note which of the following conditions provide the sources ofpolluta .. — Grazing in the wetland or within 1500 — Untreated stotmwater discharges to wetland — Tilled fields or orchards within ISO feet of • •etland — A stream or culvert discharges into well::. that drains developed areas, residential areas, fumed fields, roads, or fear-cut logging — Residential, urban areas, golf courses within 150 ft of wetland — The river or stream linked to the well d has a contributing basin where human activities have raised levels o sediment, toxic compounds or nutrients in the river water above s dards for water quality — Other YES multiplier is 2 NO uttiplier is 1 TOTAL - Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from R I by R 2 Add score to table on p. I Wetland Rating Fonts -western Washington 5 Wetland Rating Form - western Washington 7 August 2004 August 2004 epressional and Flats:Wellarids HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS - Indira rs that wetland functions to reduce flooding and stream degradation D D D D D 3. Does the wetland have the pet ntiat to reduce flooding and erosloa? (seep. 16) D 3.1 Characteristics of surface ester flows out of the wetland Wetland has no surface wale outlet points' 4 Wetland has an intermittent . flowing, or highly constricted, outlet points 2 Wetland is flat and has no • . vious outlet and/or outlet is a small ditch points - I Wetland has an unconstrict d surface outlet points = D 3.2 Depth of storage durin: wet periods Estimate the height ofpondin above the bottom of the owlet Marks of ponding are 3 ft or • rc above the surface points = 7 The wetland is a "headwater" stand" points 5 Marks of ponding between 2 11 to 3 ft from surface points • S Marks are at least 0.5 ft to <2 ft fro • surface points = 3 Wetland is flat but has small depressio on the surface that Trap water points = I Marks of pondi n less than 0.5 ft points = 0 D 3.3 Contribution of wetland to storage in watershed Estimate the ratio of thc area of upstream ban contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland itself. The area of the basin is less than 10 times the . of wetland point - 5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area o he wetland points = 3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the u of the wetland points = 0 Wetland is in the FLATS class (basin • the wetla •, by definition) points = 5 Total for D 3 A • the points in the boxes above D 4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to r . ace flooding and erosion? (see p.19) Answer YES if the wetland is in a location i the watershed where the flood storage, or reduction in water velocity, it p • vides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flood g or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO lithe water coming into the etland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate, tide gate, flap valve, rat air etc. OR you estimate that more than 90% of the water in the wetland is fr • groundwater. Note which of the following indicators •f opportunity apply. — Wetland is in a headwater of a ver or stream that has flooding problems — Wetland drains to a river or st ant that has flooding problems — Wetland has no outlet and im • •unds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or steam that has flooding problems — Other YES multiplier is 2 NO Itiplier is I Wetland Rating Form - wen= Washington Comments TOTAL - Hydrologic Fuoct . ns Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on p. 1 6 Wetland Rating Eons - western Washington a August2004 August 2004 z Q • 6 O 0 W F N LL W co g I" 0 W • I--' U � • — O I— W • W •• Z W U= O ~ Z •i%I :'�1:iJ`w' .�i { : 'i •ist'J�Y1:' "iM 1: iY'�e. ' t i.. l..: jL41. .14. +,tl +''' tili0.lii;+�N. 1 A, i.ilMAf :tiro „e4M•:i"{ty1i,4,ytiW';14'%. Xiike=fringc.Wetland9.•t.'a, " . .i ;' +i? ` r. '" WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS - Indicators that wetland functions to improve water quality ptiiiitst; :� • S S $ L 1. Does the wetland have the • • tential to improve water quality? (see p. 59) cn cn cs) cn I a a a L t.1 Average width of vegeta Vegetation is more than 33 ' Vegetation is more than 16 Vegetation is more than 6ft Vegetation Is less than 6 ft w ion along the lakeshore : (IOm) wide points w 6 • m) wide and <33ft points.. 3 • m) wide and <I6 ft points I • e points = 0 S 12 The soil 2 inches below the surface is clay, or aril or smells anoxic (h d v rotten eggs). NO NO. 0 points L I2 Characteristics of the veget ion in the wetland: choose the appropriate description that results in the hi:. I points, land do not Include any open water in your estimate of coverage. In this • e the herbaceous plants can be either the dominant form (called emergent etas or as an rnderstory In a shrub or forest community. Herbaceous plants cover >90% of the ve: tated area points w 6 Herbaceous plants cover >2/3 of the vege • area points .. 4 Herbaceous plants cover >1/3 of the vegetat • area points = 3 Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in > v vegetated area points w 3 Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in> I vegetated area points w I Aquatic bed cover> 2/3 of the vegetated area points w 0 S l� the vegetation in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the vegetation In the wetland. Dense vegetation means you have trouble seeing the soil surface. Dense, ungrazed, herbaceous vegetation > 90% of the wetland area intsr 6 Dense, ungrazed, herbaceous vegetation > 12 of area ints w 3 Dense, woody, vegetation > %r dares points - Dense, ungrazed, herbaceous vegetation > 1/4 of area points w i Does not meet any of the criteria above for vegetation points - 0 dd the points in the boxes above �— L L L 2. Does the wetland have the Answer YES if you know or surface water flowing through the following conditions provide — Wetland is along the quality standards — Grazing in the wetland — Polluted water discharges — Tilled fields or orchards — Residential or urban — Parks with grassy areas within 150 ft. of lake — Power boats with gasoline — Other opportunity to prove water quality? (seep. 61) multiplier believe there a pollutants in the lake water, or the wetland • the lake is polluted. Note which of the sou • s of pollutants. shores ore I e or reservoir that does not meet water or withi I S0ft to tland along upland edge with 150 feet of wetland areas a within ISO it of wetland that maintained, balllields, golf courses (all shore diesel engines use the lake TOTAL - Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from SI by S2 Add score to table on p. 1 YES multiplier is 2 NO ultiplier is I TOTAL- Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from LI by L2 Add score to table on p.1 �. F' ' uc Pe „ �wei � ra4 "A. y ?4 J .. ; 7r.; ?rt•s �. �.'�i:'i�'� �.•/ J �rU' flit "rs;'.po vd,i..3L...d. !'.u"1,R. ' : -. E 2 _ �f1L 4u r - . ';10. J:tt, .113 -.. n lr,:tiF+. WATER QUA F U N CTIO N S - Indicators wetland (miles/ to Improve Water quality ^J•;?' r S S $ S 1. Does the wetland have the potential to improve water quality? (seep. 64) S 3.1 Characteristics of vegetation that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms. Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fit conditions in the wetland Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation covers > 90% of the urea of the wetland. (stems of plants should be thick enough (usually > I/Sin), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows) points - 6 Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation> l2 area of wetland points w3 Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation >J/4 Ares i eg More than 1/4 of area is grazed, mowed, t or vegetation is not rigid points.. 0 cn cn cs) cn I S 1.1 Characteristics of average slope of wetland: Slope Est % or less (a I% slope liar a i foot vertical drop in elevation for every 1006 horizontal distance) points 3 Slope is 3' . • 2•/. /'e. FIG S) points m 2 Slope is greater - 5% poi . r Slope is greater than 5Y. points w 0 f0 poln S 12 The soil 2 inches below the surface is clay, or aril or smells anoxic (h d v rotten eggs). NO NO. 0 points ? •7 S l� the vegetation in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the vegetation In the wetland. Dense vegetation means you have trouble seeing the soil surface. Dense, ungrazed, herbaceous vegetation > 90% of the wetland area intsr 6 Dense, ungrazed, herbaceous vegetation > 12 of area ints w 3 Dense, woody, vegetation > %r dares points - Dense, ungrazed, herbaceous vegetation > 1/4 of area points w i Does not meet any of the criteria above for vegetation points - 0 `'� [� Total fur S I Add the points in the boxes above S S S 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (seep. 67) multiplier Answer YES Rya' know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland ?Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. — Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft — Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland — Tilled fields, logging, or orchards within 150 feet of wetland — Residential, urban areas, or golf courses are within 150 ft upslope of wetland — Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multi Ike is 1 TOTAL - Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from SI by S2 Add score to table on p. 1 h . Ill tie, _ - ..y,� Y" .e� ;: , ; : . : v e : - ” .f, !.. e:+t'i ; :•r 2 .50 x . u i 1- ct�e...s:.�.e�,"_ �;oi,. :il'.5�1� : �z. .��` i;•R.. : •d.rat _tt a• _.... ' HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS - Indicators that w etland functions to re • flooding and stream erosion • P' ,p . .r__. •.. S S $ S 3. Does the wetland have the potential, to reduce Hooding and stream erosion? (see p. 68) S 3.1 Characteristics of vegetation that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms. Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fit conditions in the wetland Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation covers > 90% of the urea of the wetland. (stems of plants should be thick enough (usually > I/Sin), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows) points - 6 Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation> l2 area of wetland points w3 Dense, uncut, rigid vegetation >J/4 Ares i eg More than 1/4 of area is grazed, mowed, t or vegetation is not rigid points.. 0 S 3.2 Characteristics of slope wetland that holds back small amounts of flood flows: The slope wetland has small surface depressions that can retain water over at least 10% of its area. S points 2 f0 poln Add the points in the boxes above S S S 4. Does the wetland have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? +. multiplier 1 (seep. 70) Is the wetland in a landscape position where the reduction in water velocity it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows? Note which of the following conditions apply. — Wetland has surface runoff that drains to a river or stream that has flooding ncoblems Krither d,A 1 tki % 'Co c-615 (Answer NO tfthe major source of water Is controlled bya reservoir (e.g. wetland Is a seep that Is on the dowrut - of YES multiplier is2 TNO multiplier is TOTAL • Hydrologic Fuact ors u tipsy the score from S 3 by S 4 Add score to table on p. 1 % Comments Wetland Rating Form- western Washington 9 August 2004 Comments r.,c',iYuL�u4rit.:4�l r: nil ✓G:a.4,+':ciJ.k uN.... sr.aai ::. Wetland Rating Form- western Washington i l August 2004 L L L L L L 4. Does the wetland have the opoo oily to reduce erosloo? (seep. 63) Are there features along the shore tha will be impacted if the shoreline erodes? Note which of the following conditions ly. — There are human structures and acti''ties along the upland edge of the wetland (buildings, fields) that can be • amagcd by erosion. — There are undisturbed natural resources •.long the upland edge of the wetland (e.g. mature forests other walla ds) than can be damaged by shoreline erosion — Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multi ken is 1 tike= tititige HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS • I icators that wetland functions to reduce shoreline erosion Po1ils L 3. Does the wetland have the Melilla! to reduce shoreline erosion? (sap. 61) L 3 Average width and c . teristics of vegetation along the Lakeshore (do not include aquatic bed): (c • •se the highest scoring description that matches conditions in the wetly •• > V. of fringe vegetatio is shrubs or trees at least 33 ft (I0m) wide points 6 >' /. of fringe vegetation •s shrubs or trees at least 6 ft. (2 m) wide points w 4 >' of fringe vegetation shrubs or trees at least 33 ft (tom) wide points w 4 Fringe vegetation is at le • 6 ft (2m) wide points w 2 Fringe vegetation is less th 6 ft (2m) wide points . 0 Record the points from the box above TOTAL - Hydrologic Fun • ns Multiply the score from L 3 by L 4 Add score to table on p. 1 multiplier Comments I Wetland Rating Form - western Washington 10 August 2004 Comments Wetland Rating Form - western Washington 12 August2004 • 71t`fsdeluts? lots iipI4toretfatsdfof tilt IICAIclasses.• ..','/...`:'`. • HABITAT FUNCTIONS • indicators that wetland functions to provide important habitat Pointy.; H 1. Does the wetland have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure (seep. 72) Choose the description that but represents condition of bujir of wetland. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See tut for definitional "undisturbed" — 100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No developed areas within undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also mans ao-grazing) Points - 5 — 100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50Y. circumference. Points -4 — 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points.. 4 — 100 at (330fl) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 25% circumference, . Points - 3 — 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or ...- . ...... for> 50% circumference. Points - 3 If buffer does not meet any of the three criteria above — No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80f1) 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points - 2 Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin) lithe class covers more than 10% of the area of the wetland or % acre. atic bed cr agent plants rub/shrub (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) _ Forested (areas where trees have >30% cover) _ Forested areas have 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground -cover) Add the number of vegetation types that qualify. Ifou have: 4 typo or more points - 4 3 r •.• • = 2 ./ • points -1 type ., t H 1.2. ]lvdrooeriods (seep. 73) Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or'' /. acre to count. (see text for descriptions of hydropertods) Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points - 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 s . resent in - 2 j _ tonally flooded or inundated aturated only Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland asonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake fringe wetland - 2 polats Freshwater tidal wetland - 2 points H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (see 75) corridor). ��� YES - 4 points (go to 112.3) •tau77l1: W II 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least S0ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other well r undisturbed upla Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft (different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the sire threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not Include Eurasian Alil /oil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian Thistle If you counted: > 19 wiles Qgj�j { -2 List species below Ifyou want to: - .k er ints - <5species points - H 2. Does the wetland have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2.1 Butlers (seep. 80) 3 Choose the description that but represents condition of bujir of wetland. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See tut for definitional "undisturbed" — 100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% of circumference. No developed areas within undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also mans ao-grazing) Points - 5 — 100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 50Y. circumference. Points -4 — 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95% circumference. Points.. 4 — 100 at (330fl) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water > 25% circumference, . Points - 3 — 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or ...- . ...... for> 50% circumference. Points - 3 If buffer does not meet any of the three criteria above — No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80f1) 95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points - 2 — No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points - 2 — Heavy grazing in buffer. Points -1 — Vegetated buffers are c2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points - 0. — Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points -1 H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (sap. 81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part ofa relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel roads, paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor). ��� YES - 4 points (go to 112.3) •tau77l1: W II 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland) that is at least S0ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or forest, and connects to estuaries, other well r undisturbed upla that are at least 2 &era s i s size? OR a Lake-f age wetland, if it oes not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES -2 points (go to 112.3) 0- 112.2.3 H 2.2.31s the wetland: within 5 mi (81om) ofa brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture ( >40 acres) OR within 1 mi of a lake Ranier than 20 acres? (YES -1 pototl NO - 0 points H 1.4. )ntersneraion of habitats (see 76) Decided from the diagrams below whether interspersion between types of vegetation (described in II i.1), or vegetation types and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none. 0 © None - 0 points Low - I point iode ate - 2 points ,. 2- [riparian braided channels] High - 3 points NOTE: If you have four or more vegetation types or three vegetation types and open water the rating is always "high ". H I.S. $pecisl Habitat Features; (seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present In the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points you put into the next column. Ige, downed, woody debris within the wetland ( >4in. diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags (diameter at the bottom > 4 inches) in the wetland _ Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft (I m) over a stream for at least 33 ft (10m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning ( >30degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present At least'/. acre of thin - stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated.(sa turesf egg - laying by hlbrans) - tnv asive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants H 1. TOTAL Score - potential for providing habitat Q Add the scores In the column above Q • I. Wetland Rating Form - western Washington 13 Wetland Ruing Eons - western Washington Is August 2004 August 2004 Comments Wetland Rating Form- western Washington 14 August 2004 6t .. _. H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (seep. 82) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft (IOOm) oldie wetland? (see text for a more detailed description of these priority habitats) _ Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains ekments of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. _ Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.8 ha (2 acres). Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft. _ Old-grow-lb. forests: (Old -growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming s multi - layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 trees/ha (8 trees/acre) > 81 cm (32 in) dbh or> 200 years of age. _ Mature forests: Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (2I in) dbh; crown cover may be less that i00%; crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old - growth; 80 - 200 years old west of the Cascade crest. _ Prairies: Relatively undisturbed areas (as indicated by dominance of native plants) where grasses and/or forbs form the natural climax plant community. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 - 2.0 m (0.5 - 6.5 ft), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component of the stand is 25%. _ Urban Natural Open Space: A priority species resides within or is adjacent to the open space and uses it for breeding and/or regular feeding; and/or the open space functions as a corridor connecting other priority habitats, especially those that would otherwise be isolated; and/or the open space is an isolated remnant of natural habitat larger than 4 ha (10 acres) and is surrounded by urban development. Estuary/Estuary-like: Deepwatcr tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands, usually semi - enclosed by land but with open, partly obstructed or sporadic access to the open ocean, and in which ocean water is at least occasionally diluted by freshwater runoff from the land. The salinity may be periodically increased above that of the open ocean by evaporation. Along some low - energy coastlines there is appreciable dilution of sea water. Estuarine habitat extends upstream and landward to where ocean- derived salts measure less than 0.5% during the period of average annual low flow. Includes both estuaries and lagoons. Mariue/Estuariue Shorelines: Shorelines include the intertidal and subtidal zones of beaches, and may also include the backshore and adjacent components of the terrestrial landscape (e.g., cliffs, snags, mature trees, dunes, meadows) that are important to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline function (e.g., sand/rock/log recruitment, nutrient contribution, erosion control). if wetland has 3 or more priority habitats - 4 points if wetland has 2 priority habitats - 3 points / .-•^"-" If wetland has I priority habitat -1 point ! No habitats - 0 points Wetland Ruing Fonts- western Washington 16 August 2004 sk.r .ts. s J w s'rTa kn'.F a� +,tv.rtlat nr: ::4.! " 'y/s,�.j,;.tp.t.H. -- z Z W 00 0 co tu WF N LL W J L1," d = W I-- _ Z �.. I-- O 0 ui o 0 O I-- W • W 0 •• - I 0~ z H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best firs) (seep. 84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within %, mile, and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other development, points w 5 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake - fringe wetlands within'' /. mile points - 5 That art at least 3 then wetlands within mile, TUT the connections bet , are disturbed LuN �T.4 04'4 1`.4 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake wit isturban and there are 3 of • 3 Tinge wetland within' Vs mile int There is least I at wetland within %. mile. 7' There are no wetlands within Vs mile. •' nis -0 H 2. TOTAL - opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores in the column above 7 Total Score for Habitat Fuectioas — add the poin for H I, H 2 and record the result on / e P. I J Weiland Ridng Form — western Washington f-lr" D D • ' I Z- (..5 / 11 i 3 . 17 August 2004 Pitzer-Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 < • t re 1 6 = ...I 0 O 0 (f) 0 CO WI CO uj 0 2 g 21 p, I- al Z 0 Z F- LU uj 0 O — O I- W u j I ▪ — LL 0 co • — o 1— z JOHN G. COMIS Professional Wetland Scientist (SWS Certif. No. 000810, dtd Nov 27, 1995) Wetlands Consultant (Listed as Certified "Wetlands Specialist" by Pierce County, 1992) EDUCATION: Bachelor of Science, Environmental Bioengineering, z University of Washington, Seattle, 1973 = `~ w W 2 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Consoer, Townsend & Associates, junior engineer, 1974 - -J 0 Pierce County Public Works, civil engineer II, planning & drainage engineer, 1977 -89 uu 0 John Comis Associates (JCA), principal & owner of "sole proprietorship ", 1989- w = present —I F. u) L w0 QUALIFICATIONS: Mr. Comis has worked a total of 31 years in public sector surface water 2 management and private sector wetland consulting. Mr. Comis' education, research, and 1 Q experience combine the highly technical fields of water biology and water engineering. u John has experience in wetland delineation's and mitigation plans including large and z w small -scale projects. , z H I— 0 Private consulting projects primarily deal with wetlands including identification, w ~ w delineation, and mitigation for new developments. Wetland projects include over 600 private developments in King, Kitsap, Pierce and Thurston Counties, including work 0 N within the City's of Algona, Auburn, Bellevue, Bothell, Bonney Lake, Buckley, 0 i — Enumclaw, Edgewood, Federal Way, Fife, Fircrest, Issaquah, Kent, Lakewood, Milton, = w Olympia, Pacific, Puyallup, Renton, Sumner, and Tacoma. John also assists clients with I — ral flood plain and drainage analysis problems including runoff modeling and backwater " — ' studies. w z U = P. Public sector experience involves many aspects of drainage and surface water management from basin level planning to site.specific analysis and design. John has experience with computer models used for estimating runoff, routing stream flows, calculating flood plain elevations and sizing retention /detention facilities. On many projects, John has worked closely with soil scientists, fishery biologists, civil engineers, surveyors, and regulatory agency staffs at all levels of government. He has frequently been involved in interdisciplinary project teams at both the planning and implementation stages. In academic research, John directed two National Science Foundation projects for an interdisciplinary research team on Kelsey and Coal Creeks, King County, Washington. He has conducted wetland, drainage, and floodplain investigations at all levels of project development. This has provided opportunities to put theory into "on- the - ground" applications for wetlands, flood plains and other aspects of surface water management. AFFILIATIONS: Member, Society of Wetland Scientists; Society for Ecological Restoration; Washington Native Plant Society; National Audubon Society. File: ORES JGCl.doc (Jan. 2005) Pitzer - Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 19 z CATHERINE A. COMIS Landscape Designer EDUCATION: Bachelor of Landscape Architecture (BSLA), University of Washington, Seattle, 1978 Bachelor of Arts, Near Eastern Studies, H University of Washington, Seattle, 1972 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: -J p US Army, Lieutenant, Military Intelligence Corps, 1972 -1976 co o TRA, landscape designs, park plans, and comprehensive master plans, 1978 -1982 w Richard Haag & Associates, landscape designs, 1983 co .. Edward Chaffee & Associates, residential & commercial landscape designs, 1983 -1987 w 0 John Comis Associates, principal, mitigation plans designer monitoring, 1988 - present g u_ Q QUALIFICATIONS: Kate Comis has served as both a designer and project manager for co numerous residential and commercial landscape design and master plan projects H w including park projects. She has served as a team member on parks and recreation area z plans and comprehensive master plans. ' z O Kate has over 27 years of experience in Washington State providing clients with p technical assistance in landscape design of residential and commercial developments. 0 cn . Her experience includes stream corridor developments; park and recreation facility 0 design; multi -use equestrian, pedestrian and bike trails. Site plan preparations include all = U aspects of preliminary site surveys, cost estimating, construction specifications, drawings LL o and management. w z UN As a parks and recreation consultant, she has worked on Public Utility District (PUD) o projects in eastern Washington State such as the Chelan County "Entiat Park ", "Lincoln Rock Park" and "Daroga Park Master Plan" at the Rocky Reach Reservoir. She also worked on the Chelan County PUD projects "Mason Park" at Lake Chelan and "Douglas County River Park" at Rock Island Reservoir. These parks were established as a minimum requirement for recreational area development along the reservoirs after damming of the Columbia River. She has also worked for private clients on camping area designs for recreational projects such as Camp Benbow, Lake Tanwax, Pierce County Jewish Camping Association; Camp Orkila, Orcas Island, YMCA of Greater Seattle; and Camp Sealth, Vashon Island, Seattle -King County Campfire Council. AFFILIATIONS: Member, American Society of Landscape Architects; Society for Ecological Restoration; Washington Native Plant Society; National Audubon Society. File: ORES - CACI.doc (Jan. 2005) Pitzer - Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 20 Pitzer- Guillermo Property By John ComisAssociates Date: 07/08/05 PROJECT - SPECIFIC REFERENCES 1. Brady, N.C. 1974. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 8th Edition. McMillan Publishing Co., New York. 2. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golat and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deep Water Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of Interior, Publication FWS /OBS- 79/31. 3. Corps of Engineers. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y -87 -1, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss., together with clarification and interpretation guidelines as published by the USACOE, 1992. [Also see Washington State 1997 Manual reference, below] 4. Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation, 1989. Federal Manual for Identfing and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. Cooperative Technical Publication by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and USDA Soil Conservation Service. January 1989. 5. Cooke, Sarah Spear (Editor). 1997. A Field Guide to the Compton Wetland Plants of Western Washington & NW Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society & Washington Native Plant Society, Seattle, Washington. 6. Guard, B. Jennifer. 1995. Wetland Plants of Oregon and Washington. Lone Pine Publishing, Redmond, Washington. 7. Hitchcock, C.L., A. Cronquist. 1977. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. 8. King County. 1995. Critical Areas Regulations (KCC 21.04 & 21A.06, Title 21 and 21A, 1993 & 1995, respectively). 9. Knobel. 1980. Field Guide to the Grasses, Sedges and Rushes of the United States. Dover Press, New York. 10. Kollmorgen Corp. 1975. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Baltimore, Maryland. 11. Pojar, J., and A. MacKinnon. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast. BC Forest Service Research Program. Lone Pine Publishing, Vancouver, Canada. 12. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest [Region 9). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Biological Report -88 (26.9). Including 1993 Supplement. 13. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1986. Wetland Plants of the State of Washington. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Biological Report -86 (W12.47). Pitzer - Guillermo Property By John Comis Associates Date: 07/08/05 22 14. Reppert, R.T., W. Sigleo, E. Stakhiv, L. Messman, and C. Beyers. 1979. Wetland Values - Concepts and Methods for Wetland Evaluation. Research Report 79 - R1, US Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Fort Belvoir, Virginia. 15. US Department of Agriculture and Washington Agricultural Experiment Station. 1979. Soil Survey of Pierce County Area, Washington. Z w 16. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1986. Hydric Soils in the Pierce 6 County Area, Washington. Prepared in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. co ❑ 17. Washington State Department of Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification w ' and Delineation Manual. Publication #96 -94. March 1997. [Note: this manual has been w 0 reviewed and approved for use by the Seattle District Corps of Engineers and is consistent 2 with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Manual (see COE reference above)]. g Q co ❑ 18. Washington State Department of Ecology. Washington State Wetlands Rating System = W Western. Publication No.93 -74. August 1993. Olympia, Washington. z 19. Washington State Department of Fisheries. Catalog of Washington Streams and Salmon Z Utilization - Volume 1. 1975. Olympia, Washington. j �. U 20. Washington Department of Ecology. Washington State Hydric Soils Guidebook. Publication o No.90 -20. July 1990. Olympia, Washington. w W H ti 0 .z -S 0 1— Pitzer - Guillermo Property By John Colitis Associates Date: 07/08/05 23 z • z ce 2 O 0 w 0 w W I --I I- U) U- 0 2 7 . 1 < u) w z 0 Z W w • 0 0 - O I- W w • 0 I- 0 0 - I= 0 I- IM vl 6. 0v.C ;vac. k) o 712 r v //0/A-e 5• i 2e. v o i".e s M(533 4.0e .6E h c t,,, c 1tt w G.. c, ci. $ D 22 36b - - Co 1/0 - Al} p egs O.A 1v . v 2.5; •— 26 5Q A¢irr vv,c je. Cowiv -4 cto y , �e t t tie 4 0 r a k e -4 -1'6 V' 4QaC\c 1° r 3 1-.fe e K s J� a5 Q Y' e_s 1,_,4 et S• -Qk14 fotAirek c +oy tetin. tit 0 d p 1n. J �1 O ct 2 1 V a �� ek del l 7 611 kb L V e �.� i e Ctobe\v e 0_1" g A1 / 06 VIA/i ten LA 6 at5 fo D t� 6 y Icto b w vvcy_5 CC v\ > 3 Co,f. b∎ ed` r\ -Q eo, G S C,I,,.� atek 3 00 0 0 6 30DO . box fe X50 /• = 9s b 11 5 c C • ,. Lam e (:) /2O/ .6 i / 1/ z z ce W QQ � J 000 LLI J � C LL ° g i w Z = 1- 0 Z F- ui U � co O • H W W iz L I z w = 0 z N d c 5' cra NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. ., to errors and omfssip —71: authorize 7._cerpt Jed: REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE annonugn DEC 16 2005 Of �TSTt�n� � BUILDING n D04-42 1 Cornerstone Geotechnical, nc. Z w 00 CO CO Ui J i-- W � = � Z = H F- O W ~ W U � ON W "- w U = z • i .711 eD 0 eD 4 0. ICV F.: a -I. . eo eD co NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR'tHAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT.. You have requested that we complete this report to evaluate subsurface conditions and provide recommendations for site development. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. November 5, 2004 Mike Davis Consulting, Inc. 27013 Pacific Highway South, PMB #353 Des Moines, WA 98198 Geotechnical Engineering Report Maldonado Property Tukwila, Washington CG File No. 1755 Dear Mr. Davis: 17625 -130th Ave. NE, C102, Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: 425.844 -1977 Fax: 425-844-1987 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering investigation at the proposed residential project in Tukwila, Washington. The site is located at 4837 South 150 Street, as shown on the Vicinity Map in Figure 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The rectangular- shaped parcel is 0.72 acres in size. We understand that the current plan is to construct either one or two single - family residences at the site. We have not been provided with a grading plan, but understand that site grading will include minor cuts and fills. SCOPE The purpose of this study is to explore and characterize the subsurface conditions and present recommendations for site development. Specifically, our scope of services as outlined in our Services Agreement, dated October 22, 2004, includes the following: Z Z . CL •J U: . 00 N O wi J I ! w 0 2 ? . I- Ill Z F.. F- 0 Z n p' U O 0 w w. H r. U- O 111 Z O ~: Z — ' • Geotechnical Engineering Report Maldonado Property November 5, 2004 CG File No. 1755 Page 2 1. Review available geologic maps of the site. 2. Explore the subsurface conditions at the site with trackhoe- excavated test pits. 3. Provide recommendations for building foundations. 4. Provide recommendations for site preparation and grading. 5. Provide general recommendations for site drainage. 6. Prepare a written report to document our conclusion and recommendations. SITE CONDITIONS Surface Conditions The project site is 0.72 acres in size and has maximum dimensions of approximately 255 feet in the east - west direction and 135 feet in the north -south direction. The northwest corner of the site is accessed from the east end of South 50 Street at the northwest corner. The site is bordered by wooded land to the south, and by residential property on the north, west, and east sides. A rough sketch of the project site is shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. The site lies along a generally moderate, east - facing slope, with localized steep areas, that drops approximately 70 feet from the west to east property lines (source: www.metrokc.gov). The site is a naturally terraced slope, with an overall slope angle of approximately 15 degrees. The site is currently overgrown with brush, blackberries, and small- to medium -sized trees. A large, dead tree, shown on the Site Plan for orientation purposes, is located toward the west end of the site. Geology Most of the Puget Sound Region was affected by past intrusion of continental glaciation. The last period of glaciation, the Vashon Stade of the Fraser Glaciation, ended approximately 11,000 years ago. Many of the geomorphic features seen today are a result of scouring and overriding by glacial ice. During the Vashon Stade, much of the Puget Sound region was overridden by over 3,000 feet of ice. Soil layers overridden by the ice sheet were compacted to a much greater extent than those that were not. The site is shown on the Geology of the Des Moines Quadrangle, Washington by Howard H. Waldron, (USGS, 1962). The map indicates that the site soils are ground moraine deposits (Qgt). A ground moraine is deposited by glaciers and is composed of mostly compact unoxidized till with a discontinuous cover of sand and gravel. Our site explorations encountered glacial till, consistent with that described as ground moraine deposits in the map. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. 1Z JU 00 N 0 . CO u. w 2 g L__/) 0 w z Z 0 O N 0 I-- w w �U H O WZ OH z Geotechnical Engineering Report Maldonado Property November 5, 2004 CG File No. 1755 Page 3 Explorations Subsurface conditions were explored at the site on October 27, 2004, by excavating two test pits with a trackhoe. The test pits were excavated to depths of 8.0 and 6.5 feet below the ground surface. The explorations were located in the field by a representative from this firm who also examined the soils and geologic conditions encountered, and maintained logs of the test pits. The approximate locations of the test pits are shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. The soils were visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, a copy of which is presented as Figure 3. The logs of the test pits are presented in Figure 4. Subsurface Conditions A brief description of the conditions encountered in our explorations is included below. For a more detailed description of the soils encountered, review the test pit logs in Figure 4. Our explorations typically encountered a surficial layer of topsoil that was less than 1 foot in thickness. The topsoil consisted of loose, dark brown to black silty sand with roots and organics. Underlying the topsoil was a weathered zone that consisted of loose, dry, red -brown silty fine sand with gravel and roots, which ranged from 0.3 to 1.0 feet in thickness. Underlying the weathered zone, we encountered medium dense, dry, gray silty fine sand with gravel. Below this horizon, in Test Pit 1, we encountered medium dense, moist, rust- stained light brown silty fine sand. Both test pits were completed in dense to very dense brown -gray silty fine sand or silty sand with gravel. We have interpreted this soil to be glacial till. Hydrologic Conditions Although ground water seepage was not encountered in our explorations, we did encountered rust - staining at approximately 4 feet in Test Pit 1. The mottled zone is a sign of perched water during the wet season. The thickness of the mottled layer does not indicate full saturation of the unit. During the wetter times of the year, we expect perched water conditions will occur as pockets of water on top of layers of low permeable soils, such as the glacial till. Perched water does not represent a regional ground water "table" within the upper soil horizons. Volumes of perched ground water vary depending upon the time of year and the upslope recharge conditions. Although wet conditions can exist due to perched ground water, flow volumes are expected to be low. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. --; Additional seismic considerations include liquefaction potential and amplification of ground motions by - soft soil deposits. The liquefaction potential is highest for loose sand with a high ground water table. The underlying dense till and drift soils are considered to have a very low potential for liquefaction and amplification of ground motion. Geotechnical Engineering Report Maldonado Property November 5, 2004 CG File No. 1755 Page 4 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Landslide Hazard The subject site is underlain by medium dense to dense glacial deposits at shallow depths. These soils have high shear strength and high resistance against slope failures. In addition, the neighboring residences have been in place for many years, indicating that no significant slope movement has occurred for some time. Erosion Hazard The erosion hazard criteria used for determination of affected areas include soil type, slope gradient, vegetation cover, and ground water conditions. The erosion potential is related to vegetative cover and the specific surface soil types (group classification), which are related to the underlying geologic units. Over the majority of the site we consider the erosion hazard to be slight with vegetative cover in place and moderate when stripped of vegetation. Best management practices (BMPs) and applicable codes should be followed during site grading to limit potential for erosion. We do not expect this site will require unusual or extreme erosion management methods. Seismic Hazard The site is classified based on its overall soil profile using Table 1615.1.1 of the 2003 International Building Code (IBC). Site conditions best fit the IBC definition for Site Class D ( "Stiff soil profile "). The IBC provides parameters and coefficients to be used in seismic design based upon this site class. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General It is our opinion that the site is compatible with the planned development. The underlying dense to very dense soils are capable of supporting the planned residential structure. We recommend that the foundation for the structure extend through any topsoil, loose, or disturbed soils, and bear on the Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Report Maldonado Property November 5, 2004 CG File No. 1755 Page 5 underlying medium dense or better, native soils, or on structural fill extending to these soils. Based on our site explorations, we anticipate these soils will generally be encountered at typical footing depths. The soils likely to be exposed during construction are moisture sensitive and will disturb easily when wet or during wet conditions. We recommend that construction take place during the drier summer months, if possible. If construction takes place during the wet season, additional expenses and delays should be expected due to the wet conditions. Additional expenses could include additional depth of site stripping, export of on -site soil, the import of clean granular soil for fill, and the need to place a blanket of rock spalls in the access roads and paved areas prior to placing structural fill. Site Preparations and Grading The first step of site preparation should be to strip the vegetation, fill, topsoil, or loose soils to expose medium dense to very dense native soils in pavement and building areas. This material should be removed from the site, or stockpiled for later use as landscaping fill. The resulting subgrade should be benched into the hillside and compacted to a firm, non - yielding condition. Areas observed to pump or weave should be repaired prior to placing hard surfaces. The soil likely to be exposed during construction is considered moisture sensitive, and the surface will disturb easily when wet. We expect these soils would be difficult, if not impossible, to compact to structural fill specifications in wet weather. We recommend that earthwork be conducted during the drier months. Additional expenses of wet weather or winter construction could include extra excavation and use of imported fill or rock spalls. During wet weather, alternative site preparation methods may be necessary. These methods may include utilizing a smooth - bucket trackhoe to complete site stripping and diverting construction traffic around prepared subgrades. Disturbance to the prepared subgrade may be minimized by placing a blanket of rock spalls or imported sand and gravel in traffic and roadway areas. Cutoff drains or ditches can also be helpful in reducing grading costs during the wet season. These methods can be evaluated at the time of construction. Structural Fill General: All fill placed beneath buildings, pavements or other settlement sensitive features should be placed as structural fill. Structural fill, by definition, is placed in accordance with prescribed methods and standards, and is monitored by an experienced geotechnical professional or soils technician. Field- Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. z � w QQ 2 J U O 0 O o CD Li, w 0 g • � u. ¢ cn I d. I- w Z = I- 0 Z ~ • w U () O -- 0 I-- ww OC I- 0 O .. w U = 0 F- z Geotechnical Engineering Report Maldonado Property November 5, 2004 CG File No. 1755 Page 6 monitoring procedures would include the performance of a representative number of in -place density tests to document the attainment of the desired degree of relative compaction. Materials: Imported structural fill should consist of a good quality, free - draining granular soil, free of organics and other deleterious material, and be well graded to a maximum size of about 3 inches. Imported, all- weather structural fill should contain no more than 5 percent fines (soil finer than a Standard U.S. No. 200 sieve), based on that fraction passing the U.S. 3/4 -inch sieve. The on -site soils should be suitable for use as structural fill, but their use will be dependent on moisture content control. Some drying of the native soils may be necessary in order to achieve compaction. During warm, sunny days this could be accomplished by spreading the material in thin lifts and compacting. Some aeration and/or addition of moisture may also be necessary. We expect that compaction of the native soils to structural fill specifications would be difficult, if not impossible, during wet weather. Fill Placement: Following subgrade preparation, placement of the structural fill may proceed. Fill should be placed in 8- to 10- inch -thick uniform lifts, and each lift should be spread evenly and be thoroughly compacted prior to placement of subsequent lifts. All structural fill underlying building areas, and within a depth of 2 feet below pavement and sidewalk subgrade, should be compacted to at least 95 percent of its maximum dry density. Maximum dry density, in this report, refers to that density as determined by the ASTM D 1557 compaction test procedure. Fill more than 2 feet beneath sidewalks and pavement subgrades should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density. The moisture content of the soil to be compacted should be within about 2 percent of optimum so that a readily compactable condition exists. It may be necessary to overexcavate and remove wet surficial soils in cases where drying to a compactable condition is not feasible. All compaction should be accomplished by equipment of a type and size sufficient to attain the desired degree of compaction. Temporary and Permanent Slopes Temporary cut slope stability is a function of many factors, such as the type and consistency of soils, depth of the cut, surcharge loads adjacent to the excavation, length of time a cut remains open, and the presence of surface or ground water. It is exceedingly difficult under these variable conditions to estimate a stable temporary cut slope geometry. Therefore, it should be the responsibility of the contractor to maintain safe slope configurations, since the contractor is continuously at the job site, able to observe the Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. z z w 00 N D J = H N u~ w o �Q = w Z = I- 0 w 0 0- 0E- w 0 1O w U =. O E ' z Geotechnical Engineering Report Maldonado Property November 5, 2004 CG File No. 1755 Page 7 nature and condition of the cut slopes, and able to monitor the subsurface materials and ground water conditions encountered. We anticipate temporary cuts for installation of the foundation and utilities. For planning purposes, we recommend that temporary cuts in the near - surface weathered soils be no greater than 1 Horizontal to 1 Vertical (1H:1V). Cuts in the dense to very dense soils may stand at a 0.75H:1V inclination or possibly steeper. If ground water seepage is encountered, we would expect that flatter inclinations would be necessary. We recommend that cut slopes be protected from erosion. Measures taken may include covering cut slopes with plastic sheeting and diverting surface runoff away from the top of cut slopes. We do not recommend vertical slopes for cuts deeper than 4 feet, if worker access is necessary. We recommend that cut slope heights and inclinations conform to local and WISHAIOSHA standards. Final slope inclinations for structural fill and the cuts in the native soils should be no steeper than 2H:1V. Lightly compacted fills or common fills should be no steeper than 3H:1V. Common fills are defined as fill material with some organics that are "trackrolled" into place. They would not meet the compaction specification of structural fill. Final slopes should be vegetated and covered with straw or jute netting. The vegetation should be maintained until it is established. Foundations Conventional shallow spread foundations should be founded on undisturbed, medium dense to very dense, native soils, or be supported on structural fill extending to those soils. If the soil at the planned bottom of footing elevation is not medium dense to very dense, it should be overexcavated to expose suitable bearing soil, and the excavation should be filled with structural fill, or the footing may be overpoured with extra concrete. Footings should extend at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished ground surface for frost protection and bearing capacity considerations. Minimum foundation widths of 16 and 24 inches should be used for continuous and isolated spread footings, respectively. Standing water should not be allowed to accumulate in footing trenches. All loose or disturbed soil should be removed from the foundation excavation prior to placing concrete. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. z Z CC g U O. o J H W 2 u _ d . 1 w z � O w 0 0- w u j � u. O 111 N O z f For foundations constructed as outlined above, we recommend an allowable design bearing pressure of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) be used for the footing design. International Building Code (IBC) guidelines should be followed when considering short-term transitory wind or seismic loads. Potential foundation settlement using the recommended allowable bearing pressure is estimated to be less than f- inch total and V2 -inch differential between footings or across a distance of about 30 feet. Higher soil bearing values may be appropriate for wider footings. These higher values can be determined after a review of a specific design. • • Geotechnical Engineering Report Maldonado Property November 5, 2004 CG File No. 1755 Page 8 We recommend the building footings near to or along sloping ground have adequate setback and embedment to be stable. This can be achieved by establishing an "effective setback" of at least 15 feet from the slope face. The "effective setback" is the horizontal distance measured from the nearest edge of the footing to the slope face, illustrated in Figure 5. This measurement should be taken to the face of the native soils, and not to the face of vegetation or debris resting on the slope. It is our opinion that the recommended effective setback and embedment criteria will provide adequate setback from the slope for the design life of the structure and if proper care of the slope is maintained. We recommend that no excavation or stockpiling of soils occur within 10 feet of the top of slope during construction, unless reviewed and approved by the geotechnical engineer. Measures to maintain stability of the slope should be implemented, such as directing surface water away from the slope and avoid placing fill or yard debris on the slope. Lateral loads can be resisted by friction between the foundation and subgrade soil, and by passive soil resistance acting on the below -grade portion of the foundation. For the latter, the foundation must be poured "neat" against undisturbed soil or backfilled with clean, free - draining, compacted structural fill. Passive resistance may be calculated as a triangular equivalent fluid pressure distribution. We recommend that an equivalent fluid density of 200 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) be used to calculate the allowable lateral passive resistance for the case of a level ground surface adjacent to the footing. An allowable coefficient of friction between footings and soil of 0.45 may be used, and should be applied to the vertical dead load only. A factor of safety of 2.0 has been applied to the passive pressure to account for required movements to generate these pressures. The friction coefficient does not include a factor of safety. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. z w re 6 U U N D iu J H W O � W a W Z O ' z F- w uj • C ) U O - O 1- W W ra U O~ z Geotechnical Engineering Report Maldonado Property November 5, 2004 CG File No. 1755 Page 9 Slabs -On -Grade Slab -on -grade areas should be prepared as recommended in the Site Preparation and Grading subsection. Slabs should be supported on medium dense to very dense native soils, or on structural fill extending to these soils. Where moisture control is a concern, we recommend that slabs be underlain by 6 inches of free - draining, coarse sand or pea gravel for use as a capillary break. A suitable vapor barrier, such as heavy plastic sheeting, should be placed over the capillary break. Drainage We recommend that runoff from impervious surfaces, such as roofs, driveway and access roadways, be collected and routed to an appropriate storm water discharge system. Final site grades should allow for drainage away from any buildings. We suggest that the finished ground surface be sloped at a gradient of 3 percent minimum for a distance of at least 10 feet away from the buildings. Surface water should be collected by permanent catch basins and drain lines, and be discharged into a storm drain system. Footing drains should be used around all of the structures where moisture control is important. The underlying till will pond water that may accumulate in the crawlspace. It is good practice to use footing drains installed at least 1 foot below planned finished floor slab or crawlspace elevation to provide drainage for the crawlspace. At a minimum, the crawlspace should be sloped to drain to an outlet tied to the drainage system. Where used, footing drains should consist of 4- inch - diameter, perforated PVC pipe that is surrounded by free - draining material, such as pea gravel. Footing drains should discharge into tightlines leading to an appropriate collection and discharge point. Crawlspaces should be sloped to drain, and a positive connection should be made into the foundation drainage system. For slabs -on- grade, a drainage path should be provided from the capillary break material to the footing drain system. Roof drains should not be connected to wall or footing drains. USE OF THIS REPORT We have prepared this report for Mr. Mike Davis, and his agents, for use in planning and design of this project. The data and report should be provided to prospective contractors for their bidding and estimating purposes, but our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of subsurface conditions. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. z 1 z . w • 2 U O U 0. CO W J � w w O LL Q • a I = z �. I— O Z H w 0- O I— Ww O U - H _ z Geotechnical Engineering Report Maldonado Property November 5, 2004 CG File No. 1755 Page 10 The scope of our work does not include services related to construction safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, except as specifically described in our report, for consideration in design. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions. We recommend that project planning include contingencies in budget and schedule, should areas be found with conditions that vary from those described in this report. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions concerning this report or if we can provide additional services, please call. Sincerely, Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Jeff Laub Project Geologist Rick B. Powell, PE Principal KLA:JPL:RBP:nt Three Copies Submitted Five Figures IEXPIRES 08/16/O I Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. w ` re 2 6 U0 U 0 , CO III u_ wO u. in_d = w ' _ z F .. ' HO Z U � O - w W O .. z • t3 a+ lacwL.'' LS: i+ `.t'iiWi ° i:'ol�r{r.'3.ta+,e+iJc r1+ _ -_� —1 S 150th St Large dead tree 0 30 60 Scale 1" = 30' Site Plan • J moderately steep„ : moderately steep —► gently sloping area: TP -1 Property Line Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. 17625 -130th Ave NE, C -102 • Woodinville, WA • 98072 Phone: (425) 844 -1977 Fax: (425) 844 -1987 Ali_ Number and Approximate Location of Test Pit LEGEND Break in slope N Mike Davis - Maldonado Property File Number Figure 1755 2 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT S DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCDOCUMENT. . THIS NOTICE IT Unified Soil Classification System MAJOR AJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME COARSE - GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% RETAINED ON number 200 SIEVE GRAVEL MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL- GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GP POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL GRAVEL WITH FINES GM SILTY GRAVEL GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND MORE THAN 50% OF COARSE FRACTION PASSES NO. 4 SIEVE CLEAN SAND SW WELL- GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND SP POORLY - GRADED SAND SAND WITH FINES SM SILTY SAND SC CLAYEY SAND FINE - GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 50% PASSES NO. 200 SIEVE SILT AND CLAY LIQUID LIMIT LESS THAN 50% INORGANIC ML SILT CL CLAY ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY LIQUID LIMIT 50% OR MORE I NORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS 1) Field classification is based on Dry- Absence of moisture, dusty, dry visual examination of soil in general to the touch accordance with ASTM D 2488 -83. 2) Soil classification using laboratory Moist- Damp, but no visible water tests is based on ASTM D 2487 -83. Wet- Visible free water or saturated, 3) Descriptions of soil density or usually soil is obtained from consistency are based on below water table interpretation of blowcount data, visual appearance of soils, and /or test data. Cornerstone Phone: (425) 844 -1977 Geotechnical Inc. Fax: (425) 844 -1987 17625 -130th Ave NE, C -102 • Woodinville, WA* 98072 Unified Soil Classification System Figure 3 • .'. t ".4.44at %tiii»:fre4:0r wac ,1%::aa °L: DEPTH TEST PIT ONE 0.0 - 0.5 SM DARK BROWN TO BLACK SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL AND ROOTS (LOOSE, DRY) (TOPSOIL) 0.5 -0.8 SM RED -BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH GRAVEL AND ROOTS (LOOSE, DRY) 0.8 - 4.0 SM GRAY SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND WITH GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, DRY) 4.0 -6.0 SM RUST - STAINED LIGHT BROWN SILTY FINE SAND (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (WEATHERED OUTWASH/TILL) 6.0 - 8.0 SM BROWN -GRAY SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL (DENSE, MOIST) (TILL) SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED AT 0.5, 3.0, 6.0 AND 7.0 FEET GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 8.0 FEET ON 10/27/04 TEST PIT TWO 0.0 -1.0 SM DARK BROWN TO BLACK SILTY SAND WITH GRAVEL AND ROOTS (LOOSE, DRY) (TOPSOIL) 1.0 - 2.0 SM RED -BROWN SILTY FINE SAND WITH GRAVEL AND ROOTS (LOOSE, DRY) 2.0 - 4.0 SM RUST - MOTTLED LIGHT BROWN -GRAY SILTY FINE SAND WITH GRAVEL AND ROOTS (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) (WEATHERED TILL) 4.0 - 6.5 USC SOIL DESCRIPTION LOG OF EXPLORATION SM LIGHT BROWN -GRAY SILTY FINE SAND (DENSE TO VERY DENSE, MOIST) (TILL) SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED AT 3.0 AND 6.5 FEET GROUND WATER SEEPAGE WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT CAVING WAS NOT ENCOUNTERED TEST PIT WAS COMPLETED AT 6.5 FEET ON 10/27/04 CORNERSTONE GEOTECHNICAL, INC. FILE NO 1755 FIGURE 4 JTJ 1 7111 Building Foundation Typical Foundation Embedment Detail with Effective Setback from Slope Face Minimum embedment of 2 feet into Medium Dense or better Native Soils (Not to Scale) Face of Slope Minimum 15-Foot Horizontal Distance from Face of Slope Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. 17625-130th Ave NE, C-102 • Woodinville, WA • 98072 Phone: (425) 844-1977 Mike Davis - Maldonado Property Fax: (425) 8t1987 File Number Figure 1755 5 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR I tHAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Important Information About Your Geotechnical Engineering Report Subsurface problems are a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. The following information is provided to help you manage your risks. Geotechnical Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a civil engi- neer may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geotechnical engineering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. No one except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one — not even you — should apply the report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. Read the Full Report Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selected elements only. A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Based on A Unique Set of Project - Specific Factors Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project- specific fac- tors when establishing the scope of a study. Typical factors include: the client's goals, objectives, and risk management preferences; the general nature of the structure involved, its size, and configuration; the location of the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates oth- erwise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was: • not prepared for you, • not prepared for your project, • not prepared for the specific site explored, or • completed before important project changes were made. Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical engineering report include those that affect: • the function of the proposed structure, as when it's changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse, • elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure, • composition of the design team, or • project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes —even minor ones —and request an assessment of their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because their reports do not consider developments of which they were not informed. Subsurface Conditions Can Change A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a geolechnical engineer- ing reportwhose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time; by man -made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natural events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctua- tions. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before applying the report to determine if it is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. Most Geotechnical Findings Are Professional Opinions Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engi- neers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ— sometimes significantly — from those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engineer who developed your report to provide construction observation is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. A Report's Recommendations Are Not Final Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included in your report. Those recommendations are not final, because geotechnical engi- neers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual • Z C4 6 QQ � JU U 0 e) ILI CO Li. J= w 0 �a = • a �.w z = I- O z� w • w U � O N O I-- w W O ..z • = O ff' z . 4....r�J r,. N•Nr:�M..�� z Iz w UO c o Lu Qw w O LQ co I w I— O z � U� oI- w u- .. z U= O � z SEP - -2004 09:35 FROM: • CWA CONSULTANTS STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING BUILDING CODE CONSULTANTS Plan r ,-, t , ; _ Lateral Load Analysis for: Design Unlimited Plan 2103S/A/2 King County, WA Per 2003 IBC using gat v 4.0 TO:253B960821 FILE copy Permit No. 22421 N,E, 20th Street, Sammanwish, WA 98074 (425) 836-2833 FAX (425) 836-3707 E -Mail: chuck.cwa®av Seismic Design Category Site Class SDs R Exposure Wind Speed Snow Load D D 0.847 6.5 (0M0) 'B' 85 mph (3 sec) 25 psf September 10, 2004 This lateral has been personally reviewed by me and it is - in full compliance with the 2003 Intcrnation D04 -42 r7., - : 3 Q3 15 - a • P.001/003 0f19, — .thorize •celpt • . , CIT O F UKW ILA NOV 2 3 2004 PERMIT CENTER REVIEVVED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE sononupo DEC 16 2005 BUILDING Tukwila DIVISION , yna101710, z • z re w QQ � J U O 0 0 W W F- u.t 0 2 g Q co I 1-w ' 1—O L U uj 2 U � wW L I o wz 0 z Y 1. Halls Holddowns Struts 89 -10 -2084 2163SA2 5 4D.0 _ _- ...�9�nta'caG'�.IY!':f13i r. xy. •�i.� ._ - .r Y .C_�=:�.:' 1 1 1 C 7116" Idooa Structural Panel w/ 10e1 Box CGr III S ecies ]= C Simpson Strong -Tie Holdowni [ Gr III species E Simpson Cnnctr ] x- Exceeds maximum table value NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. m 0 0 ro 0 i A 1 -� Story : 1 Walls H o l ddo wns Struts 69- 11 -26434 2103SA2 4 Ctc,K 1:Dr C3 f13 .05o(7 l� ;ZOO dlL- C 7 /16" Wood Structural Panel w, iAd. Box EGr III Species 3= L Simpson Strong -Tie Holdownl I Gr III Species [ Simpson Cnnctr 3 4E- Exceeds maximum table Value NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR 1HAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. m 0 W 0 0 W SW # Shear Wall Sheathing [Thick (side)] Edge Nailing (in oc) Anchor Bolts (in oc) Bottom Plate (in oc) Rim /Blk to Top plate (in oc) Allow Shear (Klf) Notes HNM LC) lON 7/16" OSB(1) 10d @ 6 5/8" @ 48 16d @ 5 A35 @24 w/12 -8d 0.23 1 7/16" OSB(1) 10d @ 4 5/8" @ 32 16d @ 3 A35 @l6 w /12 -8d 0.34 1 7/16" OSB(1) 10d @ 3 5/8" @ 12 16d @ 2 A35 @12 w /12 -8d 0.45 1,3,5 7/16" OSB(1) 10d @ 2 5/8" @ 8 16d @ 2 A35@ 9 w/12 -8d 0.60 1,3,5 7/16" OSB(2) 10d @ 4 5/8" @ 24 2 -16d @ 3 2- A35 @15 w12 -8d 0.70 1 -6 7/16" OSB(2) 10d @ 3 5/8" @ 18 2 -16d @ 2 2- A35 @12 w12 -8d 0.90 1 -6 7/16" OSB(2) 10d @ 2 5/8" @ 12 2 -16d @ 2 2 -A35@ 9 w12 -8d 1.20 1 -6 [ Shear Wall Schedule ] [ 7/16" Wood Structural Panel w/ 10d Box] [Gr III Species ] [ Shear Wall Notes ] GENERAL NOTES (apply to all shear walls) a) For Rated Sheathing panels, space nails @ 12 in (305 mm) oc along intermediate framing members. b) Block all panel edges with minimum 2x (51mm) blocking. c) Apply nailing to all studs, top and bottom plates and blocking. d) Framing to be a maximum of 24 in (610mm) oc. e) Fasteners shall be driven flush with surface of sheathing. f) Provide solid blocking under the shear walls at the diaphragms to accommodate the bottom plate attachment. g) Offset panel joints on each side of wall minimum one stud bay. SPECIAL NOTES FOR SHEAR WALLS (apply to walls specifically noted) 1) APA Rated Sheathing EXP1 /EXP2 /EXT or C -C /C -D /Struct II Plywood. 2) Provide 3x's (76mm) at adjoining panel edges w /nails staggered. 3) Provide minimum 3x (76mm) blocking or joists beneath bottom plate with bottom plate nails staggered. 4) Walls >0.35 klf use a minimum of a 3x sill. For walls between 0.35 and 0.60 anchor bolt spacing has been decreased by 1/2 (use 2x). 5) Framing to be a maximum of 16 in (610 mm) o.c. for shear walls 1 and 2. 6) Provide nailing at intermediate supports the same as edge nailing in shear walls that use GWB (shear walls 1 and 2). 7) For shear walls 2, 7, 8, and 9, panel joints shall be offset to fall on different framing members or framing shall be 3" nominal or thicker, and nails on each side shall be staggered. z w o DC� 00 co o co tu La I W O 2 J to d I I. • 1-O Z ~ w n O • N L] I- w tL O .. z U = O ~ z [ Holdown Schedule ] [ Gr III Species [ Simpson Strong -Tie Holdown] [ Simpson 2004 Catalog ] ] [ Holddown Notes ] GENERAL NOTES a) Minimum concrete compresive strength to be 2.5 ksi (17.2 MPa). b) Refer to manufacturers' catalogs for minimum distance to foundation corner. c) Refer to manufacturers' catalogs for minimum backing member size. d) Refer to manufacturers' catalogs for anchor bolt embedment depth. e) Posts at holddown: 2x & 4x (38mm x and 89mm x) - -- #2 or better 6x ( 140mm x ) - -- #1 or better f) The anchor type holddowns at other levels shall have a pair, one above and one below, tied by a threaded rod. g) Use STHD8RJ for STHD8, STHD10RJ for STHD10, and STHD14RJ for STHD14 where rim joists are installed. i) The stud fastener for STHD's shall be 16d sinkers. j) Minimum stem wall to be 6" wide for 1 -story buildings, 8" wide for buildings having 2 or more stories z • z • w QQ � JU O 0 CO o W J I =- � � LL w 0 L Q = • a I-w Z = ZO 11J ui U � O N w W w Z = O H z s xi Jtit; a: A: ti. ltt' t_. S ��aati✓;: dc; F...+ts.; •. Foundation Level Holdown ] ] HD Type Stud Fastner Anchor Cap Detail # Fastener Type to Stud Bolt Kips Number Type STHD8 X X X X X X X X X NNNNNd+d '4 V) C N I N N N N (24) 16d - -- 2.37 CS18(36 ") XXXXX?CS4X?C NNNN re) rn(I) N N N N N N STHD10 (28) 16d - -- 2.99 (2) CS20 (36 ") STHD14 (38) 16d - -- 4.43 (2) CS18 (36 ") PHD6 (18)SDS3 7/8 "0 5.86 (2)CS16(48 ") PHD8 (24)SDS3 7/8 "0 6.73 MST72 HDQ8 (20) SDS3 7/8 8.33 2)MST48 HD10A (4)7/8 "0 7/8 "0 9.54 2)MST60 HD14A (4) 1" 0 1" 0 11.08 2)MST72 HD15 (5) 1" 0 1 -1/4 "0 15.30 [ Holdown Schedule ] [ Gr III Species [ Simpson Strong -Tie Holdown] [ Simpson 2004 Catalog ] ] [ Holddown Notes ] GENERAL NOTES a) Minimum concrete compresive strength to be 2.5 ksi (17.2 MPa). b) Refer to manufacturers' catalogs for minimum distance to foundation corner. c) Refer to manufacturers' catalogs for minimum backing member size. d) Refer to manufacturers' catalogs for anchor bolt embedment depth. e) Posts at holddown: 2x & 4x (38mm x and 89mm x) - -- #2 or better 6x ( 140mm x ) - -- #1 or better f) The anchor type holddowns at other levels shall have a pair, one above and one below, tied by a threaded rod. g) Use STHD8RJ for STHD8, STHD10RJ for STHD10, and STHD14RJ for STHD14 where rim joists are installed. i) The stud fastener for STHD's shall be 16d sinkers. j) Minimum stem wall to be 6" wide for 1 -story buildings, 8" wide for buildings having 2 or more stories z • z • w QQ � JU O 0 CO o W J I =- � � LL w 0 L Q = • a I-w Z = ZO 11J ui U � O N w W w Z = O H z s xi Jtit; a: A: ti. ltt' t_. S ��aati✓;: dc; F...+ts.; •. L rIvu.l1VW11 A7L..LIcu .I. [ Simpson Strong -Tie [ Simpson 2003 Catalog Holdown ] ] Other Levels HD Type Stud Fastener Tie Cap Detail # Type to Stud Rod Kips Number CS18(36 ") XXXXX?CS4X?C NNNN re) rn(I) N N N N N N (18)10d - -- 1.27 (2) CS20 (36 ") (18) 8d ea - -- 2.01 (2) CS18 (36 ") (18) 10d ea - -- 2.54 (2)CS16(48 ") (28) 8d ea - -- 3.30 MST72 (56)16d ea - -- 5.80 2)MST48 (42)16d ea - -- 7.63 2)MST60 (46)16d ea - -- 8.92 2)MST72 (56)16d ea - -- 11.60 HD15 (5) 1 "0 5/4 15.30 [ Holdown Schedule ] [ Gr III Species [ Simpson Strong -Tie Holdown] [ Simpson 2004 Catalog ] ] [ Holddown Notes ] GENERAL NOTES a) Minimum concrete compresive strength to be 2.5 ksi (17.2 MPa). b) Refer to manufacturers' catalogs for minimum distance to foundation corner. c) Refer to manufacturers' catalogs for minimum backing member size. d) Refer to manufacturers' catalogs for anchor bolt embedment depth. e) Posts at holddown: 2x & 4x (38mm x and 89mm x) - -- #2 or better 6x ( 140mm x ) - -- #1 or better f) The anchor type holddowns at other levels shall have a pair, one above and one below, tied by a threaded rod. g) Use STHD8RJ for STHD8, STHD10RJ for STHD10, and STHD14RJ for STHD14 where rim joists are installed. i) The stud fastener for STHD's shall be 16d sinkers. j) Minimum stem wall to be 6" wide for 1 -story buildings, 8" wide for buildings having 2 or more stories z • z • w QQ � JU O 0 CO o W J I =- � � LL w 0 L Q = • a I-w Z = ZO 11J ui U � O N w W w Z = O H z s xi Jtit; a: A: ti. ltt' t_. S ��aati✓;: dc; F...+ts.; •. DS # Conn Type Drag Strut Fastner to Cnnctr Thru Rod Cap Kips Note No. 24 " -CS16 DBL TOP PL (22) -10d -- 1.65 3.30 4.95 6.79 9.64 11.08 15.30 19.80 30.61 NNNNNNF-'Nt -' (2)24 " -CS16 DBL TOP PL (22) -10d ea -- (3)24 " -CS16 4x 6 (22) -10d ea -- 155 "- CMST14 4x 6 (88) -10d -- 14 202 "- CMST12 4x 6 (118) -l0d -- (2) -HD14A 4x 6 ea (4)- 1" 0 1" 0 (2) -HD15 6x10 ea (5)- 1" 0 1 -1/4 "0 (4) -HD10A 6x10 ea (4) -7/8 "0 7/8 "0 (4) -HD15 6x10 ea (5)- 1" 0 1 -1/4 "0 [ Drag Strut Schedule ] [ Simpson Cnnctr ] [ Simpson 1996 Catalog ] [Gr. i /II Species] [ Drag Strut Notes ] GENERAL NOTES (apply to all drag struts) a) Each listed drag strut is the minimum size for the design drag force and may be replaced by members with larger cross sections. b) Double top plates to be graded Standard or better (Ft critical). c) 4x and 6x members to be graded No.2 or better (Ft critical). SPECIAL NOTES FOR DRAG STRUTS (where specifically noted) 1) The length of the metal strap is the total nailing length, one half applies within shear wall, the other half beyond shear wall on the drag strut. The number of nails to metal strap connector is the total number of nails required, one half applies within shear wall, the other half beyond shear wall on the drag strut. 2) The anchor tie shall have a pair, one applies within shear wall, the other beyond shear wall on the drag strut. z z �w WU . O 0 Lu J = F^ w LL Q = a z � F- 0 Z ~ uj . 0 • N: O I- w F- U' O w z U= 0 z 1 Designs Unlimited Time : 15:05:54 Date : 09 -10 -2004 SUMMARY OF SHEAR WALL AND HOLDDOWN SELECTIONS Walls Parallel to Y axis Story Line Wall SW LtHD RtHD 2 1 1 1 2. 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 * Exceeds table capacity — None required WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) File: 2103SA2 Page: 1 SW selection based on file: W7HF1OBW.TBL HD selection based on file: HCWA.TBL OCWA.TBL z = Z 6 0 J O 0 CO 00 W i • LL WO J =d : w i . 0 z F- O O O N O H W W • U 1 0 . tiJ z . 0= 17: H' z • Designs Unlimited Time : 15:05:54 Date : 09 -10 -2004 SUMMARY OF SHEAR WALL AND HOLDDOWN SELECTIONS Walls Parallel to X axis Story Line Wall SW LtHD RtHD 2 A 1 1 1 1 2 A 2 1 - 1 2 A 3 1 1 1 2 A 4 1 1 1 2 C 1 1 1 1 2 C 2 1 1 1 2 C 3 1 1 1 2 C 4 1 1 1 1 A 1 1 1 1 1 A 2 1 1 - 1 C 1 3 3 3 1 C 2 3 3 3 * Exceeds table capacity - None required WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) File: 2103SA2 Page: 1 SW selection based on file: W7HF1OBW.TBL HD selection based on file: HCWA.TBL OCWA..TBL. Z Z re 6 UO N O W = u WO }} g J w =. I H W Z _� O Z I- W • w U � O 52 W W' U L w z U(I) -- : O 1 z IV Designs Unlimited Time : 13:02:29 Date : 09 -10 -2004 SUMMARY SHEET SEISMIC DATA: Manual BSF Y -Axis = 0.095 BSF X -Axis = 0.095 WIND DATA: Manual Wind Exposure = B Wind Speed = 85 Structure = Encl /Unenci Imp Factor = 1.00 Story 2 Story 1 WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) File: 2103SA2 Page: 1 of 5 Load Summary II to Y II to X Level (K) DL Seis Wind DL Seis Wind - - 2 - 19.2 2.3 4.0 21.0 2.5 3.5 - - 1 12.8 0.8 3.2 14.0 0.8 2.8 -- Base Total 3.0 7.2 3.3 6.3 12 ce w 6 - U <. U OD co W I J h" • u w0 LL cc T. d . E I- O Z � w J . 2 • p O — O I- w LU- X O Li.; z TA : 1 H ' O Z' Designs Unlimited Time : 13:02:29 Date : 09 -10 -2004 INPUT DATA - Walls WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) File: 2103SA2 Page: 2 of 5 z lZ re w JU WALLS Parallel to Y -Axis 00 coo X X Y (OW Story 2 _I H Line 1 mu_ Wall 1 0.0 0.0 3.0 9.0 19.0 19.0 0.015 0.0 1.0 0.0 W Line 5 Wall 1 40.0 40.0 3.0 9.0 32.0 32.0 0.015 0.0 1.0 0.0 ' Story 1 Ea a Line 1 HW Wall 1 0.0 0.0 3.0 9.0 30.0 30.0 0.015 0.0 1.0 0.0 ' it = Line 4 ' 1--0 Wall 1 40.0 40.0 3.0 9.0 32.0 32.0 0.015 0.0 1.0 0.0 w D0 O - (a H WW H H u. w U O ~, Calc Plot Wall Length Wall Lt Trib Rt Dis Dis Dis Ht Shear Holddown DL Span Width Span (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (Ksf) (ft) (ft) (ft) WALLS Parallel to X -Axis Y Y X Story 2 Line A Wall 1 0.0 3.0 0.0 9.0 3.0 3.0 0.015 0.0 15.0 6.0 Wall 2 0.0 3.0 9.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 0.015 6.0 15.0 4.0 Wall 3 0.0 3.0 17.0 9.0 3.0 3.0 0.015 4.0 15.0 0.0 Wall 4 0.0 3.0 37.0 9.0 3.0 3.0 0.015 0.0 15.0 0.0 Line C Wall 1 35.0 33.0 0.0 9.0 3.0 3.0 0.015 0.0 15.0 0.0 Wall 2 35.0 33.0 10.0 9.0 3.0 3.0 0.015 0.0 15.0 0.0 Wall 3 35.0 35.0 20.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 0.015 0.0 1.0 0.0 Wall 4 35.0 35.0 36.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 0.015 0.0 1.0 0.0 Story 1 Line A Wall 1 0.0 3.0 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 0.015 0.0 7.0 2.0 Wall 2 0.0 3.0 18.5 9.0 13.0 13.0 0.015 2.0 6.0 0.0 Line C Wall 1 35.0 33.0 0.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 0.015 0.0 7.0 5.0 Wall 2 35.0 33.0 9.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 0.015 5.0 7.0 0.0 z . ,....:��:;; 4i,:..,.. � �.:: lcf a`,;`;:;��,•,i; -f ,,, d;.::d, �- �;�.,':ste-L'' "....,.v;sF::.9�v� :ti.,s. 1 Designs Unlimited Time : 13:02:29 Date : 09-10-2004 LINES Parallel to Y-Axis INPUT DATA - Diaphragms WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) File: 2103SA2 Page: 3 of 5 Build Dead Part Live Start Cant Ext Wind Wind Dimen Load Load Load Dia Dia Wall Load Uplift (ft) (Ksf) (Ksf) (Ksf) (ft) (Ksf) (klf) (ksf) Roof Level Lines 1 5 32.0 0.015 0.000 0.000 3.0 0.000 0.100 0.008 Level 1 Lines 1 4 32.0 0.010 0.000 0.000 3.0 0.000 0.080 0.008 LINES Parallel to X-Axis Roof Level Lines A C 40.0 0.015 0.000 0.000 0.0 0.000 0.100 0.008 Level 1 Lines A C 40.0 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.0 0.000 0.080 0.000 • 1- : z ul 2 2 - c.) O 0 co 0 ai — I F. u j 0 2 g co F- Z ' 0 Z 0 1.1.3 uj 2 • C) O — Ca I— w u j 0 r: b ai 0 _ o • -;.1, 2,- Designs Unlimited Time : 13:02:29 Date : 09-10-2004 OUTPUT DATA - Shear Walls and Hoiddown Forces WALLS Parallel to Y-Axis Story 2 Ln 1 Wall 1 Ln 5 Wall 1 Story 1 Ln 1 Wall 1 Ln 4 Wall 1 1.1 2.0 1.1 2.0 1.5 3.6 1.5 3.6 WALLS Parallel to X-Axis Story 2 Ln A 1.2 1.7 Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Ln C 1.2 1.7 Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Story 1 Ln A 1.7 3.1 Wall 1 Wall 2 Ln C 1.7 3.1 Wall 1 Wall 2 WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) File: 2103SA2 Page: 4 of 5 Line Shear Wall Shear H Drag Force Holddowns Seis Wind Seis Wind Lt Rt Left Rght (K) (K) (klf) (klf) N (K) (K) (K) (K) 0.060 0.105 0.5 0.0 0.8 0.036 0.062 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.051 0.120 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.047 0.112 0.3 0.0 0.0 S-Support required beneath holddown M-Manaul input of holddown 0.096 0.135 3.0 0.0 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.096 0.135 2.3 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.096 0.135 3.0 0.0 0.5 0.8 0.9 0.096 0.135 3.0 0.3 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.089 0.125 3.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.8 0.089 0.125 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 0.089 0.125 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.089 0.125 2.3 0.3 0.0 0.9 0.9 0.083 0.157 1.3 0.3 0.0 1.6 1.3 0.083 0.157 0.7 0.0 0.3 1.4 0 0.394 2.3 0.0 0.6 4.1 3.8 0.208 0.394 2.3 0.4 0.9 3.8 4.1 Designs Unlimited Time : 13:02:29 Date : 09-10-2004 LINES Parallel to Y-Axis OUTPUT DATA - Diaphragms and Chord Forces WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) File: 2103SA2 Page: 5 of 5 H Dia Load Seismic Shear Wind Shear Chord Force Seismic Wind Left Right Left Right Max at W (Kips) (Kips) (Klf) (Klf) (K1f) (Klf) (Kip) .xxL Roof Level Lines 1 5 1.3 2.28 4.00 0.04 -0.04 0.06 -0.06 0.6 .50 Level 1 Lines 1 4 1.3 0.76 3.20 0.01 -0.01 0.05 -0.05 0.5 .50 LINES Parallel to X-Axis Roof Level Lines A C 0.9 2.49 3.50 0.03 -0.03 0.04 -0.04 0.4 .50 Level 1 Lines A C 0.9 0.83 2.80 0.01 -0.01 0.04 -0.04 0.3 .50 Designs Unlimited Time : 13:02:30 Date : 09 -10 -2004 WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) File: 2103SA2 Page: 1 * * * * * * * * ** Detailed Calculations * * * * * * * * ** WALLS Parallel to Y -Axis z Story 2 Line 1 Wall 1 Height 9.0 SW Len 19.0 HD Len 19.0 Wt 0.015 1 z. Seismic Wind ct 2 Wall Force: 1.140 2.000 6 v OTM 11.356 18.000 U O Uniform DL: 0.015 0.007 t0 o Header DL : LT 0.000 RT 0.000 LT 0.000 RT 0.000 J w Max Down : LT -0.598 RT -0.598 LT -0.947 RT -0.947 N '- Res Moment: LT 23.014 RT 23.014 LT 17.173 RT 17.173 w O Holddown LT -0.614 RT -0.614 LT 0.044 RT 0.044 2QQ Story 2 Line 5 Wall 1 Height 9.0 SW Len 32.0 HD Len 32.0 Wt 0.015 LL Q Y g N n Seismic Wind = 0 Wall Force: 1.140 2. 0 0 0 i-- _ OTM 12.107 18.000 ?H- Uniform DL: 0.015 0.007 ' Z O 0 uj Header DL : LT 0.000 RT 0.000 LT 0.000 RT 0.000 � Max Down : LT -0.378 RT -0.378 LT -0.562 RT -0.562 D 0 Res Moment: LT 65.280 RT 65.280 LT 48.712 RT 48.712 O 92 . Holddown LT -1.662 RT -1.662 LT -0.960 RT -0.960 p H ww o Story 1 Line 1 Wall 1 Height 9.0 SW Len 30.0 HD Len 30.0 Wt 0.015 I Seismic Wind O Wall Force: 1.520 3.600 LLjZ OTM 15.411 32.400 U Uniform DL: 0.010 0.010 0 E- Header DL : LT 0.000 RT 0.000 LT 0.000 RT 0.000 z Max Down LT -0.514 RT -0.514 LT -1.080 RT -1.080 Res Moment: LT 55.463 RT 55.463 LT 43.717 RT 43.717 Holddown LT -1.335 RT -1.335 LT -0.377 RT -0.377 Story 1 Line 4 Wall 1 Height 9.0 SW Len 32.0 HD Len 32.0 Wt 0.015 Seismic Wind Wall Force: 1.520 3.600 OTM 15.527 32.400 Uniform DL: 0%010 0.010 Header DL : LT 0.000 RT 0.000 LT 0.000 RT 0.000 Max Down LT -0.485 RT -0.485 LT -1.012 RT -1.012 Res Moment: LT 63.104 RT 63.104 LT 49.741 RT 49.741 Holddown LT -1.487 RT -1.487 LT -0.542 RT -0.542 Designs Unlimited Time : 13:02:30 Date : 09 -10 -2004 WALLS Parallel to X -Axis Story 2 Line A Wall Force: OTM Uniform DL: Header DL : Max Down : Res Moment: Holddown . Story 2 Line A Wall Force: OTM Uniform DL: Header DL : Max Down : Res Moment: Holddown . Story 2 Line A Wall Force: OTM Uniform DL: Header DL : Max Down . Res Moment: Holddown . Story 2 Line A Wall Force: OTM Uniform DL: Header DL : Max Down . Res Moment: Holddown . Story 2 Line C Wall Force: OTM Uniform DL: Header DL : Max Down . Res Moment: Holddown . Wall 1 Height Seismic 0.288 2.763 0.225 LT 0.000 RT LT -0.921 RT LT 1.377 RT LT 0.462 RT Wall 2 Height Seismic 0.384 3.684 0.225 LT 0.675 RT LT -1.596 RT LT 4.743 RT LT -0.265 RT Wall 3 Height 9.0 SW Len Seismic 0.288 2.763 0.225 LT 0.450 RT 0.000 LT -1.371 RT -0.921 LT 2.524 RT 1.377 LT 0.079 RT 0.462 Wall 4 Height Seismic 0.288 2.763 0.225 LT 0..000 RT LT -0.921 RT LT 1.377 RT LT 0.462 RT Wall 1 Height Seismic 0.267 2.578 0.225 LT 0.000 RT LT -0.859 RT LT 1.377 RT LT 0.400 RT WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) File: 2103SA2 Page: 2 9.0 SW Len 3.0 HD Len 3.0 Wt 0.015 Wind 0.404 3.635 0.105 0.675 LT 0.000 RT 0.315 - 1.596 LT -1.212 RT -1.527 3.098 LT 0.724 RT 1.357 -0.112 LT 0.970 RT 0.759 9.0 SW Len 4 0 HD Len 4.0 Wt 0.015 Wind 0.538 4.846 0.105 0.450 LT 0.315 RT 0.210 - 1.371 LT -1.527 RT -1.422 3.978 LT 2.131 RT 1.849 - 0.074 LT 0.679 RT 0.749 3.0 HD Len 3.0 Wt 0.015 Wind 0.404 3.635 0.105 LT 0.210 RT 0.000 LT -1.422 RT -1.212 LT 1.146 RT 0.724 LT 0.830 RT 0.970 9.0 SW Len 3.0 HD Len 3.0 Wt 0.015 Wind 0.404 3.635 0.105 0.000 LT 0.000 RT 0.000 - 0.921 LT -1.212 RT -1.212 1.377 LT 0.724 RT 0.724 0.462 LT 0.970 RT 0.970 9.0 SW Len 3.0 HD Len 3.0 Wt 0.015 Wind 0.375 3.375 0.105 0.000 LT 0.000 RT 0.000 -0.859 LT -1.125 RT -1.125 1.377 LT 0.724 RT 0.724 0.400 LT 0.884 RT 0.884 z w QQ � JU U 00 . w � � w0 u_ co n � W z F- 0 Z ~ W U� O - O H W UJ U w U= O~ z • Designs Unlimited Time : 13:02:30 Date : 09 -10 -2004 WALLS Parallel to X -Axis WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) File: 2103SA2 Page: 3 Story 2 Line C Wall 2 Height 9.0 SW Len 3.0 HD Len 3.0 Wt 0.015 Seismic Wind Wall Force: 0.267 0.375 OTM : 2.578 3.375 Uniform DL: 0.225 0.105 Header DL : LT 0.000 RT 0.000 LT 0.000 RT 0.000 Max Down : LT -0.859 RT -0.859 LT -1.125 RT -1.125 Res Moment: LT 1.377 RT 1.377 LT 0.724 RT 0.724 Holddown LT 0.400 RT 0.400 LT 0.884 RT 0.884 Story 2 Line C Wall 3 Height 9.0 SW Len 4.0 HD Len 4.0 Wt 0.015 Seismic Wind Wall Force: 0.356 0.500 OTM 3.437 4.500 Uniform DL: 0.015 0.007 Header DL : LT 0.000 RT 0.000 LT 0.000 RT 0.000 Max Down LT -0.859 RT -0.859 LT -1.125 RT -1.125 Res Moment: LT 1.020 RT 1.020 LT 0.761 RT 0.761 Holddown LT 0.604 RT 0.604 LT 0.935 RT 0.935 Story 2 Line C Wall 4 Height 9.0 SW Len 4.0 HD Len 4.0 Wt 0.015 Seismic Wind Wall Force: 0.356 0.500 OTM 3.437 4.500 Uniform DL: 0.015 0.007 Header DL : LT 0.000 RT 0.000 LT 0.000 RT 0.000 Max Down LT - 0.859 RT -0.859 LT -1.125 RT -1.125 Res Moment: LT 1.020 RT 1.020 LT 0.761 RT 0.761 Holddown LT 0.604 RT 0.604 LT 0.935 RT 0.935 Story 1 Line A Wall 1 Height 9.0 SW Len 7.0 HD Len 7.0 Wt 0.015 Seismic Wind Wall Force: 0.582 1.102 OTM 5.641 9.922 Uniform DL: 0.070 0.070 Header DL : LT 0.000 RT 0.070 LT 0.000 RT 0.070 Max Down LT -0.806 RT -0.876 LT -1.417 RT -1.487 Res Moment: LT 4.269 RT 4.686 LT 3.365 RT 3.693 Holddown LT 0.196 RT 0.136 LT 0.937 RT 0.890 Story 1 Line A Wall 2 Height 9.0 SW Len 13.0 HD Len 13.0 Wt 0.015 Seismic Wind Wall Force: 1.081 2.047 OTM 10.476 18.427 Uniform DL: 0.060 0.060 Header DL : LT 0.060 RT 0.000 LT 0.060 RT 0.000 Max Down LT -0.866 RT -0.806 LT -1.477 RT -1.417 Res Moment: LT 14.669 RT 14.006 LT 11.563 RT 11.040 Holddown LT -0.323 RT -0.272 LT 0.528 RT 0.568 3 Designs Unlimited Time : 13:02:30 Date : 09 -10 -2004 WALLS Parallel to X -Axis Story 1 Line C Wall Force: OTM Uniform DL: Header DL : Max Down . Res Moment: Holddown . Story 1 Line C Wall Force: OTM Uniform DL: Header DL : Max Down : Res Moment: Holddown . Wall 1 Height 9.0 SW Len Seismic 0.831 7.712 0.070 LT 0.000 RT 0.175 LT -1.928 RT -2.103 LT 1.394 RT 1.989 LT 1.579 RT 1.431 Wall 2 Height 9.0 SW Len Seismic 0.831 7.712 0.070 LT 0.175 RT 0.000 LT -2.103 RT -1.928 LT 1.989 RT 1.394 LT 1.431 RT 1.579 WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) File: 2103SA2 Page: 4 4.0 HD Len 4.0 Wt 0.015 Wind 1.575 14.175 0.070 LT 0.000 RT 0.175 LT -3.544 RT -3.719 LT 1.099 RT 1.568 LT 3.269 RT 3.152 4.0 HD Len 4.0 Wt 0.015 Wind 1.575 14.175 0.070 LT 0.175 RT 0.000 LT -3.719 RT -3.544 LT 1.568 RT 1.099 LT 3.152 RT 3.269 z rt U0 N w= � u O g Q co z C! W I-- O Z W 2 0 UN W u1 = U :• Z W 1- _ (3/"' Z Designs Unlimited Time : 13:02:31 Date : 09 -10 -2004 SUMMARY OF ACCUMULATED HOLDDOWN FORCES @ LEFT END OF SHEAR WALL Walls Parallel to Y axis Story Line Wall 3 4 LEFT END SEIS WIND X Y Lt Lt Dis Dis HD HD ft ft K K 1 36.00 20.00 1.21 1.25 2 4 1 36.00 22.50 4.38 5.49 WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) File: 2103SA2 Page: 1 Designs Unlimited Time : 13:02:31 Date : 09-10-2004 SUMMARY OF ACCUMULATED HOLDDOWN FORCES @ RIGHT END OF SHEAR WALL Walls Parallel to Y axis Story Line Wall 3 3 1 22.00 30.00 0.23 0.39 2 3 1 22.00 33.00 4.82 6.59 3 4 1 36.00 24.50 1.21 1.25 2 4 1 36.00 32.50 3.60 4.70 3 4 2 36.00 33.00 1.09 1.17 RIGHT END SEIS WIND X Y Rt Rt Dis Dis HD HD ft ft K K WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) File: 2103SA2 Page: 2 Designs Unlimited Time : 13:02:31 Date : 09-10-2004 SUMMARY OF ACCUMULATED HOLDDOWN FORCES @ LEFT END OF SHEAR WALL Walls Parallel to X axis LEFT END SEIS WIND X Y Lt Lt Dis Dis HD HD Story Line Wall ft ft 2 A 2 10.50 0.00 2.01 1.56 1 A 1 10.50 0.00 3.41 3.25 2, A 3 23.00 0.00 2.50 1.92 1 A 2 23.50 0.00 3.26 3.40 3 A 3 36.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 2 A 5 49.00 0.00 2.46 1.89 3 B 5 39.00 31.00 0.69 0.73 2 B 5 39.50 31.00 3.19 2.68 3 B 1 0.00 33.00 1.36 0.99 2 B 1 0.00 33.00 4.21 3.18 3 B 2 11.00 33.00 1.31 0.98 2 B 2 11.00 33.00 4.11 3.13 3. B 3 22.00 33.00 1.36 0.99 2 B 3 22.00 33.00 4.11 3.11 3. 4 33.00 33.00 1.31 0.98 2 B 4 33.00 33.00 3.75 2.87 WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) File: 2103SA2 Page: 3 `PIZ Vq Designs Unlimited Time : 13:02:31 Date : 09 -10 -2004 WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) File: 2103SA2 Page: 4 SUMMARY OF ACCUMULATED HOLDDOWN FORCES @ RIGHT END OF SHEAR WALL Walls Parallel to X axis Z RIGHT END SEIS WIND X Y Rt Rt Z ' re Dis Dis HD HD m Story Line Wall ft ft K K v 2 A 2 18.00 0.00 2.01 1.56 1 A 1 18.00 0.00 3.41 3.25 co u_ W O: 2 ' A 5 52.00 0.00 2.46 1.89 2 . 1 A 2 54.00 0.00 2.87 2.88 u.< D. 3 B 5 44.50 31.00 0.00 0.50 i W 2 B 5 45.50 31.00 2.38 2.30 ° Z H 1 B 2 54.00 31.00 0.00 0.20 . F .. O. Z N 3 B 1 3.00 33.00 1.31 0.98 2 D . 2 B 1 3.00 33.00 4.11 3.13 V CI O N 3 B 2 14.00 33.00 1.36 0.99 H 3 B. 3 25.00 33.00 1.31 0.98 X 0 2 B 3 25.00 33.00 3.75 2.87 LL , • ~ 3. B 4 36.00 33.00 1.36 0.99 Z U Z 2 B 4 36.00 33.00 4.11 3.11 p H O Z , Designs Unlimited Time : 15:05:54 Date : 09-10-2004 SUMMARY OF SHEAR WALL AND HOLDDOWN SELECTIONS Walls Parallel to Y axis Story Line Wall SW LtHD RtHD 2 1 1 1 2 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 * Exceeds table capacity - None required WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) File: 2103SA2 Page: 1 SW selection based on file: W7HF1OBW.TBL HD selection based on file: HCWA.TBL OCWA.TBL • • . • ' • • ' SUMMARY OF SHEAR WALL AND HOLDDOWN SELECTIONS • Designs Unlimited WOODCAD QLAT (Pro V4.0) Time 15:05:54 File: 2103SA2 Date : 09 -10 -2004 Page: 1 Walls Parallel to X axis Story Line Wall SW LtHD RtID 2 A 1 1 1 1 2 A 2 1 - 1 2 A 3 1 1 1 2 A 4 1 1 1 2 C 1 1 1 1 2 C 2 1 1 1 2 C 3 1 1 1 2 C 4 1 1 1 1 A 1 1 1 1 1 A 2 1 1 - 1 C 1 3 3 3 1 C 2 3 3 3 * Exceeds table capacity None required SW selection based on file: W7HF10BW.TBL HD selection based on file: HCWA.TBL OCWA. TBI z . �Z c4 J O 0 u W = W O u.< Nd = W _ Z F.. F- 0 Z F-- O - O F- = U .z 1 ; Z .DESIGNS UNLIMITED STOCK PLANS • CUSTOM DESIGN Gravity Load Analysis Plan — 2103S/A/2 Beam Calculations using Beam Chek 2.3 Software and/or TJBeam 6.01 Software 11/12/03 RVIONED 5)R COM. COSAPLIWCE. b 000m ovo LIEC 1 B Z005 OfTul 14.111.,D1%(; TVISIOW FILE COPY RECEIVED crrY OF ruKwiLA NOV 2 3 2004 PERMIT CENTER D04-421 • • • 19613.81st Ave S Suite F■Ter I Fax: (2533 872-3849 • Email:designstudio@designsunlimited.com " ' ' • . . ' CULAVA.444;4:.:ii4 z Ct '. 1 1:tr rS doe co w de or orc: 11- z F. :.. is , re U3 2 -J 0 0 to w CO a. uj 0 g t co D • - Z 1- 0 Z W uj n 0 0 — a I- W w 0 rz 9 - - 0 lij 0 1- z PLAN 2103S/A/2 DINING ROOM Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads R1 = 1164 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 BEAM -1 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 4x 10 HF #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft NDS '91 Min Bearing Area R1= 2.9 inz R2= 2.9 in DL Defl 0.01 in Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 6.0 ft 7.87 # 47 # 1745 '# L / 240 L/360 Reaction 1 LL 713 # Reaction 2 LL Reaction 1 TL 1164 # Reaction 2 TL Maximum V 1164 # Max V (Reduced) 865 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 713 # 1164 # Section (in') Shear (inz) TL Defl (in) Fb (psi) Uniform LL: 238 Fv (psi) LL Defl 49.91 20.53 OK 41% 32.38 17.29 OK 53% 0.04 0.30 OK 13% 0.02 0.20 OK 12% E (psi x mil) Base Values 850 Base Adjusted 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform TL: 380 = A Uniform Load A SPAN = 6 FT Uniform and partial uniform Toads are Ibs per lineal ft. R2 = 1164 Fc L (psi) Z Z a JU 00 • w J = H U) LL WO 2 J• u _Q 2 0 F Wm 1- O Z 1- W Lu 2 • p U O N o W • u1 IL O W Z • = O F. Z PLAN 2103S/A/2 KITCHEN Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adiustments Loads R1 = 776 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 4x 10 HF #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft NDS '91 Min Bearing Area R1= 1.9 in R2= 1.9 in DL Defl <0,01 in. Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 4.0 ft 7,87 # 31 # 776 '# L/240 L/360 Reaction 1 LL 475 # Reaction 1 TL 776 # Maximum V 776 # Max V (Reduced) 477 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL 475 # 776 # Section (in Shear (in TL Defl (in) Fb (psi) Uniform LL: 238 BEAM -2 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 LL Defl 49.91 9.13 OK 18 % 32.38 9.54 OK 29% 0.01 0.20 OK 4% <0.01 0.13 OK 3% Fv (psi) E (psi x mil) Base Values 850 Base Adjusted 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform TL: 380 = A Uniform Load A SPAN = 4 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 776 Fol. (psi) Z i • H Z re W 6 J U O 0 co w ui w uL W j `n_ • a 1— O Z1— U O - O l-- W W 2 1— U- O W Z U= O 1— Z q ' 4:14i :IFY.'«Y:': PLAN 2103S/A/2 MASTER BATH Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Adjustments R1 = 170 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 BEAM - 3 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 4x 10 H F #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft NDS '91 Min Bearing Area R1= 0.4 in R2= 0.4 in DL Defl <0.01 in. Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 5.0 ft 7.87 # 39 # 212 '# L / 240 L/360 Reaction 1 LL 94 # Reaction 1 TL 170 # Maximum V 170 # Max V (Reduced) 117 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL 94 # 170 # Section (in Shear (in TL Defl (in) LL Defl 49.91 2.50 OK 5% 32.38 2.35 OK 7% 0.00 0.25 OK 1% <0.01 0.17 OK 1% Fb (psi) Fv (psi) Base Values 850 Base Adjusted 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform LL: 38 E (psi x mil) Uniform TL: 60 = A Uniform Load A SPAN = 5 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 170 Fc i (psi) Z � W 00 co w W I O W 2 ua I W . Z = O Z F— W W U O 0 — O '— W W H0 U. W Z U = O ~ Z PLAN 2103S/A/2 MASTER BEDROOM Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adiustments Loads BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 BEAM -4 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 4x 10 HF #2 Lu =0.0Ft NDS '91 Min Bearing Area R1= 2.9 in R2= 2.9 in DL Defl 0.01 in Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 6.0 ft 7.87 # 47 # 1745 '# L / 240 L/ 360 Reaction 1 LL 713 # Reaction 2 LL Reaction 1 TL 1164 # Reaction 2 TL Maximum V 1164 # Max V (Reduced) 865 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 713# 1164 # Section (in Shear (in TL Defl (in) LL Defl 49.91 20.53 OK 41% 32.38 17.29 OK 53% 0.04 0.30 OK 13% 0.02 0.20 OK 12% Fb (psi) Uniform LL: 238 Fv (psi) E (psi x mil) Base Values Base Adjusted 850 75 1020 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform TL: 380 = A Uniform Load A R1 = 1164 SPAN = 6 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 1164 Fc..L (psi) W re U0 N D LU X CO u_ W 0 }} J uL 4 W a H W I Z � I- 0 W F- O • N O I- W U J rz — O .. W O = ~ Z PLAN 2103S/A/2 BEDROOM -2 BEAM Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 NDS '91 Min Bearing Area BEAM -5 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 4x 10 HF #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft R1= 0.6 in R2= 0.6 in DL Defl <0.01 in. Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 5.5 ft 7.87 # 43 # 332'# L / 240 L / 360 Reaction 1 LL 138 # Reaction 1 TL 242 # Maximum V 242 # Max V (Reduced) 174 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL 138 # 242 # Section (in Shear (in TL Defl (in) LL Defl 49.91 3.91 OK 8% 32.38 3.48 OK 11% 0.01 0.28 OK 2% <0.01 0.18 OK 2% Fb (psi) E (psi x mil) Uniform LL: 50 Fv (psi) Base Values 850 Base Adjusted 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform TL: 80 = A Uniform Load A R1 = 242 SPAN = 5.5 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 242 Fc (psi) M PLAN 2103S/A/2 BEDROOM -2 WIN. HDR Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual. Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads R1 = 170 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 BEAM - 6 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 • 4x 10 H F #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft NDS '91 Min Bearing Area R1= 0.4 in R2= 0.4 in DL Defl <0.01 in. Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 5.0 ft 7.87 # 39 # 212'# L / 240 L/360 Reaction I LL 94 # Reaction 1 TL 170 # Maximum V 170 # Max V (Reduced) 117 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL 94 # 170 # Section (in Shear (in TL Defl (in) LL Defl 49.91 2.50 OK 5% 32.38 2.35 OK 7% 0.00 0.25 OK 1% <0.01 0.17 OK 1% Fb (psi) Uniform LL: 38 Fv (psi) E (psi x mil) Base Values 850 Base Adjusted 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform TL: 60 = A Uniform Load A SPAN = 5 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 170 Fol. (psi) • • 1N1wiLOI ..+W.w�.a+4: +war..ra.��l W Sc...�w....'.a•1iis. .�w�ww- Yi:i+.: FZ: W Wes 00 co J COIL-. W O IL. j. N d I -- = Z 1— 0 Z F U � O — O H WW LI O Z W 0 Z PLAN 2103S/A/2 BEDROOM -3 Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads BEAM BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 NDS '91 Min Bearing Area BEAM -7 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 4x 10 HF #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft R1= 0.6 in R2= 0.6 in DL Defl <0.01 in. Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 5.5 ft 7.87 # 43 # 332 '# L / 240 L / 360 Reaction 1 LL 138 # Reaction 1 TL 242 # Maximum V 242 # Max V (Reduced) 174 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL 138 # 242 # Section (in Shear (in TL Defl (in) 49.91 3.91 OK 8% 32.38 3.48 OK 11% 0.01 0.28 OK 2% <0.01 0.18 OK 2% R1 = 242 Fb (psi) Base Values 850 Base Adjusted 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive . Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform LL: 50 Fv (psi) LL Defl E (psi x mil) Uniform TL: 80 = A Uniform Load A SPAN = 5.5 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 242 Fc (psi) Z Z • ¢¢ C JU 00 N W= -.I I.- U. W L L = I- U- Z � I- O Z lii W � O 0 I-- W W . H rr - U- O5. W Z U N O Z PLAN 2103S/A/2 BEDROOM -3 Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads WIN. HDR R1 = 170 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 NDS '91 Min Bearing Area Section (in Shear (in TL Defl (in) Fb (psi) Uniform LL: 38 BEAM -8 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 4x 10 HF #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft R1= 0.4 in R2= 0.4 in DL Defl <0.01 in. Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 5.0 ft 7.87 # 39 # 212 '# L / 240 L / 360 Reaction 1 LL 94 # Reaction 1 TL 170 # Maximum V 170 # Max V (Reduced) 117 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL 94 # 170 # Fv (psi) LL Defl 49.91 2.50 OK 5% 32.38 2.35 OK 7% 0.00 0.25 OK 1% <0.01 0.17 OK 1% E (psi x mil) Base Values 850 Base Adjusted 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform TL: 60 = A l Uniform Load A SPAN = 5 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 170 Fc I (psi) PLAN 2103S/A/2 ENTRY Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments R1 = 1344 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 4x 10 HF #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft NOS '91 Min Bearing Area R1= 3.3 in R2= 3.3 in DL Defl 0.02 in Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 6.0 ft 7.87 # 47 # 2015 '# L / 240 L / 360 Reaction 1 LL 825 # Reaction 2 LL Reaction 1 TL 1344 # Reaction 2 TL Maximum V 1344 # Max V (Reduced) 998 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 825 # 1344 # Section (in') Shear (in TL Defl (in) Fb (psi) Fv (psi) Uniform LL: 275 BEAM -9 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 LL Defl 49.91 23.71 OK 48% 32.38 19.97 OK 62% 0.04 0.30 OK 14% 0.03 0.20 OK 13% E (psi x mil) Base Values 850 Base Adjusted 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform TL: 440 = A Uniform Load A SPAN =6 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 1344 Fc I (psi) 2 W Ce JU O 0 CO W= J N � W D 2 u.4 N � = I- W Z = i- 0 Z r • W U � O - • H W • W LL. Z W - co 0 Z .61 'dA:.;SVMe4�ws`vxLS�rial4.;w PLAN 2103S/A/2 LIVING ROOM Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads BEAM R1 =,1078 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 4x 10 H F #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft NDS '91 Min Bearing Area R1= 2.7 in R2= 2.7 in DL Defl 0.02 in Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 7.0 ft 7.87 # 55 # 1886 '# L / 240 L /360 Reaction 1 LL 656 # Reaction 1 TL 1078 # Maximum V 1078 # Max V (Reduced) 840 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL 656 # 1078 # Section (in Shear (in TL Defl (in) 49.91 22.18 OK 44% 32.38 16.80 OK 52% 0.06 0.35 OK 16% 0.03 0.23 OK 14% Fb (psi) Base Values 850 Base Adjusted 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform LL: 188 BEAM -10 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 Fv (psi) LL Defl E (psi x mil) Uniform TL: 300 = A Uniform Load A SPAN = 7 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 1078 Fcl (psi) PLAN 2103S/A/2 LIVING ROOM WIN. HDR Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads R1 = 324 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 BEAM - 11 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 4x 10 HF #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft NDS '91 Min Bearing Area Section (in R1= 0.8 in R2= 0.8 in DL Defl <0.01 in. Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 6.0 ft 7.87 # 47 # 485 '# L / 240 L / 360 Reaction 1 LL 188 # Reaction 1 TL 324 # Maximum V 324 # Max V (Reduced) 240 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL 188 # 324 # Shear (in TL Defl (in) Fv (psi) LL Defl 49.91 5.71 OK 11% 32.38 4.81 OK 15% 0.01 0.30 OK 3% <0.01 0.20 • OK 3% Fb (psi) E (psi x mil) Base Values Base Adjusted 850 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform LL: 63 Uniform TL: 100 = A Uniform Load A SPAN = 6 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 324 Fc L (psi) Z rt i O 0 0 CO CO UJ J H- c� LL, W 0 } g J u_ < 12 3 W . Z F- 1- O Z 1— W IA 0 O N 0 I- W LL h-, - Z L11 0 O f- Z PLAN 2103S/A/2 BEAM AT POST (ENTRY) Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 BEAM -12 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 4x 10 HF #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft R1 = 59 NDS '91 Min Bearing Area R1= 0.1 in R2= 0.1 in DL Defl <0.01 in. Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 1.75 ft 7.87 # 14# 26 '# L / 240 L / 360 Reaction 1 LL 33 # Reaction 1 TL 59 # Maximum V 59 # Max V (Reduced) 7 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL 33 # 59 # Section (in Shear (in TL Defl (in) Fb (psi) Uniform LL: 38 Fv (psi) SPAN =1.75 FT LL Defl 49.91 0.31 OK 1% 32.38 0.14 OK 0% 0.00 0.09 OK 0% <0.01 0.06 OK 0% E (psi x mil) Base Values 850 Base Adjusted 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform TL: 60 = A Uniform Load A Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 59 Fc ± (psi) PLAN 2103S/A/2 DECK BEAM Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads /\ R1 = 2077 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 BEAM -13 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 4x 14 HF #2 Lu =0.0 Ft NDS'91 Min Bearing Area R1= 5.1 in R2= 5.1 in DL Defl 0.03 in Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 11.5 ft 11.27 # 130 # 59721 L / 240 L / 360 Reaction 1 LL Reaction 1 TL Maximum V 1725 # 2077 # 2077 # Max V (Reduced) 1678 # TL Actual Defl L / 858 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL 1725 # 2077 # Section (in Shear (in TL Defl (in) LL Defl 102.41 84.31 OK 82% 46.38 33.57 OK 72% 0.16 0.58 OK 28% 0.13 0.38 OK 35% Fb (psi) Uniform LL: 300 Fv (psi) E (psi x mil) Base Values 850 Base Adjusted 850 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform TL: 350 = A Uniform Load A SPAN =11.5 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 2077 Fc 1 (psi) 1 � W W V U O CD 0 J O LL W � LL Q CO � Z = 1- Z 1-- W 2 p U co 0 I-- W O W Z _ 0 I' Z 4 404 , F3: +.-. . .11.1W4::. >:i: .v' PLAN 2103S/A/2 REC. RM. S.G.D. Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads R1 = 2416 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg #8101 -1456 BEAM -14 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 6x 10 HF #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft NDS'91 Min Bearing Area R1= 6.0 in R2= 6.0 in DL Defl 0.01 in Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 6.0 ft 12.7 # 76 # 3623 '# L / 240 L / 360 Reaction 1 LL 1770 # Reaction 2 LL Reaction 1 TL 2416 # Reaction 2 TL Maximum V 2416 # Max V (Reduced) 1778 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 1770 # 2416 # Section (in') Shear (in TL Defl (in) 82.73 64.42 OK 78% 52.25 38.10 OK 73% 0.05 0.30 OK 18% 0.04 0.20 OK 20% Fb (psi) Fv (psi) LL Defl E (psi x mil) Fc ± (psi) Base Values Base Adjusted 675 675 70 70 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform LL: 590 Uniform TL: 793 = A Uniform Load A SPAN = 6 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 2416 "�.: ..ri i'.-c�:ir.. "'3 Y;a1�= ..cw... . ti<��;.h:..,..Y: h'. ,v...r�c.L;L 6(tArG.:�:li'.er.34i�✓•:idtiJ. a:iXJint,'a • p 4 PLAN 2103S/A/2 LAUNDRY Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads Pt loads: R1 = 402 BeamChek v2,4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 4x 10 HF #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft NDS '91 Min Bearing Area R1= 1.0 in R2= 2.0 in' DL Defl <0.01 in. Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 2.0 ft Reaction 1 LL 160 # Reaction 2 LL 7.87 # Reaction 1 TL 402 # Reaction 2 TL 16 # Maximum V 790 # 370'# Max V (Reduced) 242 # L / 240 TL Actual Defl L / >1000 L / 360 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 160 # 790 # Section (in Shear (in TL Defl (in) 49.91 4.35 OK 9% 32.38 4.83 OK 15% 0.00 0.10 OK 1% <0.01 0.07 OK 0% B = 776 Fb (psi) Uniform LL: 160 1.5 BEAM - 15 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 Fv (psi) LL Defl E (psi x mil) Base Values 850 Base Adjusted 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform TL: 200 = A Point TL Distance Uniform Load A 0 SPAN = 2 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 790 Fc I (psi) PLAN 2103S/A/2 BEDROOM -4 Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads R1 = 924 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 BEAM 16 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 4x 10 HF #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft NDS '91 Min Bearing Area Section (in R1= 2.3 in R2= 2.3 in DL Defl <0.01 in. Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 6.0 ft 7.87 # 47 # 1385 '# L / 240 L/360 Reaction 1 LL 720 # Reaction 1 TL 924 # Maximum V 924 # Max V (Reduced) 686 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL 720 # 924 # Shear (in TL Defl (in) LL Defl 49.91 16.30 OK 33% 32.38 13.73 OK 42% 0.03 0.30 OK 10% 0.02 0.20 OK 12% Fb (psi) Uniform LL: 240 Fv (psi) E (psi x mil) Base Values Base Adjusted 850 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform Ti.: 300 = A Uniform Load A SPAN = 6 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 924 Fc (psi) Z Q • - . W re 6 JU O 0 W = F- U) W • } g J u_ ? -± a W I F- O Z W • W U � O — CI H W W ~ II. iU-- .. Z W • = Z PLAN 2103S/A/2 GARAGE BEAM Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads R1 = 5099 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited .Reg # 8101 -1456 BEAM - 17 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 5 -1/8x 19 -1/2 GLB 24F -V4 DF /DF Lu = 0.0 Ft Min Bearing Area R1= 7.8 in R2= 7.8 inz DL Defl 0.07 in Suggested Camber 0.10 in Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 19.0 ft 24.28 # 461 # 24222 '# L / 240 L / 360 Reaction 1 LL 3895 # Reaction 2 LL Reaction 1 TL 5099 # Reaction 2 TL Maximum V 5099 # Max V (Reduced) 4227 # TL Actual Defl L / 827 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 3895 # 5099 # Section (in') Shear (inz) TL Defl (in) LL Defl 324.80 125.87 OK 39% 99.94 33.37 OK 33% 0,28 0.95 OK 29% 0.21 0.63 OK 33% Fb (psi) E (psi x mil) Uniform LL: 410 Fv (psi) Base Values Base Adjusted 2400 2309 190 190 1.8 1.8 650 650 Cv Volume Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 0.962 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform TL: 513 = A Uniform Load A SPAN = 19 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are Ibs per lineal ft. R2 = 5099 Fc I (psi) PLAN 2103S/A/2 O.H.G.D. HDR Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 3 -1 /8x 12 GLB 24F -V8 DF /DF Lu =0.OFt Lu @OH =0.0Ft Overhang, Min Bearing Area Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 16.25 ft 9.11 # 157 # 4318 '# L / 240 L / 360 Reaction 1 LL 314 # Reaction 1 TL 946 # Maximum V 983 # Max V (Reduced) 924 # TL Actual Defl L / 706 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 Reaction 2 LL 638 # Reaction 2 TL 1532 # Overhang Length 1.0 ft Total Beam Length 17.25 ft OH TL Actual Defl L / 523 OH LL Actual Defl L / < -1000 Section (in') R1= 1.5 in R2= 2.4 in DL Defl 0.21 in Shear (in TL Defl (in) 75.00 21.59 OK 29% 37.50 7.29 OK 19% 0.28 0.81 OK 34% 0.07 0.54 OK 13% -0.05 0.10 OK 46% -0.01 0.07 OK 21% Fb (psi) Uniform LL: 40 BEAM -18 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 Fv (psi) LL Defl E (psi x mil) Uniform TL: 50 = A OH TL Defl Fc1 (psi) OH LL Defl Base Values Base Adjusted 2400 2400 190 190 1.8 1.8 650 650 Cv Volume Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.000 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 CI Stability © OH 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le @ OH = 0.00 Ft (Uniform Ld on Backspan) I Point LL Point TL Distance Par Unif LL Par Unif TL Start End B = 242 C = 484 D = 242 62 F = 180 (OH) Pt loads: R1 = 946 B 2.5 8.0 13.75 1.0 Uniform Load A I�J 240 BACKSPAN = 16.25 FT K = 360 (OH) D K F R2 = 1532 OH = 1 FT 0 Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. Overhanging load distances are from R2. 1.0 PLAN 2103S/A/2 • BEAM UNDER Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads R1 = 390 STAIR BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 4x10 HF #2 Lu =0.OFt NDS '91 Min Bearing Area R1= 1.0 in R2= 1.0 in DL Defl <0.01 in. Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 3.35 ft 7.87 # 26 # 327 '# L / 240 L / 360 Reaction 1 LL Reaction 1 TL Maximum V 302 # 390 # 390 # Max V (Reduced) 211 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL ,302# 390 # Section (in Shear (in TL Defl (in) Fb (psi) Uniform LL: 180 BEAM - 19 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 LL Defl 49.91 3.84 OK . 8% 32.38 4.21 OK 13% 0.00 0.17 OK 1% <0.01 0.11 OK 2% Fv (psi) E (psi x mil) Base Values 850 Base Adjusted 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform TL: 225 = A Uniform Load A SPAN = 3.35 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 390 Fc I (psi) PLAN 2103S/A/2 STORAGE HDR Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads R1 = 291 NDS '91 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 BEAM - 20 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 4x 10 HF #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft Min Bearing Area R1= 0.7 in R2= 0.7 in DL Defl <0.01 in. Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 2.5 ft 7.87 # 20 # 182 '# L / 240 L / 360 Reaction 1 LL 225 # Reaction 1 TL 291 # Maximum V 291 # Max V (Reduced) 112 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL 225 # 291 # Section (in Shear (in TL Defl (in) LL Defl 49.91 2.14 OK 4% 32.38 2.23 OK 7% 0.00 0.13 OK 1% <0.01 0.08 OK 1% Fb (psi) Fv (psi) Uniform LL: 180 E (psi x mil) Uniform TL: 225 = A Uniform Load A SPAN = 2.5 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 291 Fc L (psi) Base Values 850 Base Adjusted 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cl Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 PLAN 2103S/A/2 BDRM -5 DR. Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads HDR R1 = 572 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 4x 10 HF #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft NDS '91 Min Bearing Area R1= 1.4 in R2= 1.4 in DL Defl <0.01 in. Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 2.5 ft 7.87 # 20 # 358 '# L / 240 L / 360 Reaction 1 LL Reaction 1 TL Maximum V 450 # 572 # 572 # Max V (Reduced) 219 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL 450 # 572 # Section (in') Shear (in TL Defl (in) 49.91 4.21 OK 8% 32.38 4.39 OK 14% 0.00 0.13 OK 1% <0.01 0.08 OK 1% Fb (psi) Fv (psi) Uniform LL: 360 BEAM -21 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 LL Defl E (psi x mil) Uniform TL: 450 = A Uniform Load A SPAN = 2.5 FT Uniform and partial uniform Toads are Ibs per lineal ft. Fc L (psi) Base Values 850 Base Adjusted 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 R2 = 572 Z W 6 • 6 00 W = J N W O u. Z � O . Z W D U 0 H WW 2 L I O .. Z. W F= ▪ _ O i- Z PLAN 2103S/A/2 BDRM -5 WIN. HDR Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads 225 Pt loads: R1 = -261 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 Overhang, Uplift © R1, NDS '91 Min Bearing Area R1= -0.6 in R2= 5.3 in BEAM - 22 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 4x 10 H F #2 Lu =0.0Ft Lu @ OH = 0.0 Ft Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 5.0 ft 7.87 # 55 # 2031 '# L / 240 L/360 Reaction 1 LL Reaction 1 TL Maximum V -146 # -261 # 1591 # Max V (Reduced) 1147 # TL Actual Defl L / < -1000 LL Actual Defl L / < -1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL Overhang Length Total Beam Length OH TL Actual Defl OH LL Actual Defl 1351 # 2142 # 2.0 ft 7.0 ft L / >1000 L / >1000 Section (in Shear (in TL Defl (in) LL Defl -0.01 0.17 OK 6% Fb (psi) Fv (psi) E (psi x mil) OH TL Defl 49.91 23.89 OK 48% 32.38 22.94 OK 71% -0.02 0.25 OK 6% 0.04 0.20 OK 19% 0.02 0.13 OK 16% Fc 1 (psi) OH LL Defl Base Values Base Adjusted 850 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 CI Stability @ OH 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le @ OH = 0.00 Ft F = 440 (OH) Uniform LL: 40 I Point LL Point TL Distance Par Unif LL Par Unif TL Start End 2.0 390 BACKSPAN = 5 FT Uniform TL: 50 = A K = 568 (OH) R2 = 2142 OH = 2 FT (Uniform Ld on Backspan) 0 Uniform Load A K Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. Overhanging load distances are from R2. 2.0 PLAN 2103S/A/2 REC. RM. DR. HDR Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads R1 = 1301 BEAM - 23 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 NDS '91 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101 -1456 4x 10 HF #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft Min Bearing Area R1= 3.2 in R2= 3.2 in DL Defl <0.01 in. Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 5.0 ft 7.87 # 39 # 1626 '# L / 240 L / 360 Reaction 1 LL 1025 # Reaction 1 TL 1301 # Maximum V 1301 # Max V (Reduced) 900 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L I >1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL 1025 # 1301 # Section (in Shear (in TL Defl (in) LL Defl 49.91 19.13 OK 38% 32.38 18.00 OK 56% 0.02 025 OK 10% 0.02 0.17 OK 12% Fb (psi) E (psi x mil) Uniform LL: 410 Fv (psi) Base Values Base Adjusted 850 75 1020 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform TL: 513 = A Uniform Load A SPAN = 5 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 1301 Fc I (psi) Z S � • W re 2 J V O 0 u, W = • W ill O J u_ Q = W Z � I— 0 Z W D p c o U O — O I— W W H 0 . at O ill Z, 0 Z PLAN 2103S/A/2 LAUNDRY DR. HDR Selection Conditions Data Attributes Actual Critical Status Ratio Values Adjustments Loads R1 = 578 BeamChek v2.4 licensed to: Designs Unlimited Reg # 8101-1456 BEAM - 24 Prepared by: C. SWEI Date: 11/12/03 4x 10 HF #2 Lu = 0.0 Ft NDS '91 Min Bearing Area R1= 1.4 in R2= 1.4 in DL Defl <0.01 in. Beam Span Beam Wt per ft Bm Wt Included Max Moment TL Max Defl LL Max Defl 2.67 ft 7.87 # 21 # 386 '# L / 240 L / 360 Reaction 1 LL 454 # Reaction 1 TL 578 # Maximum V 578 # Max V (Reduced) 244 # TL Actual Defl L / >1000 LL Actual Defl L / >1000 Reaction 2 LL Reaction 2 TL 454 # 578 # Section (in Shear (in TL Defl (in) 49.91 • 4.54 OK 9% 32.38 4.88 OK 15% 0.00 0.13 OK 1% <0.01 0.09 OK 1% Fb (psi) Uniform LL: 340 Fv (psi) LL Defl E (psi x mil) Base Values 850 Base Adjusted 1020 75 75 1.3 1.3 405 405 CF Size Factor Cd Duration Cr Repetitive Ch Shear Stress Cm Wet Use 1.200 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 CI Stability 1.0000 Rb = 0.00 Le = 0.00 Ft Kbe = 0.0 Uniform TL: 425 = A Uniform Load A SPAN = 2.67 FT Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft. R2 = 578 Fc L (psi) Reference Number(s) of Related Document(s): �OL� -y Grantor /Borrower: "9 1 ? �Cl _ ��� s z - AMR<, /(A �'fiZ s _ Grantee /Beneficiary: CITY OF TUKWILA, a municipal corporation of King County, Washington Work Location: 4f 3 7 Sa 15O7 ? S7 - 7 - 1,1 K wj IA- Abbreviated Work Description: Indemnification and Hold Harmless and Permit Temporary in Nature SQt J ?& 11J' L4 3 tJAT4R rno% G40 - NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: The Permittee shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims, losses or liability, including attorney's fees, arising from injury or death to persons or damage to property occasioned by any act, omission or failure of the Permittee, its officers, agents and employees, in using the City's right -of -way under this permit. This indemnification and hold harmless shall not apply to any damage resulting from the sole negligence of the City, its agents and employees. To the extent any of the damages referenced by this paragraph were caused by or resulted from the concurrent negligence of the City, its agents or employees, this obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless is valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the Permittee, its officers, agents, and employees. Further, the right -of -way permit herein is wholly of a temporary nature and it vests no permanent right to use whatsoever to the Permittee. Page / of .3 z • z w 6 U O 0 CO J = H U W u_ N = W z f .. I- 0 Z ~ 0 ON 0 h- w W H r- U O .• Z W U = 0 z t DATED this /l day of 011/J GRANTOR: Pi f zer E& vies, �h . a WaShinyi"On corporation P ntName: L)00,1 Its: STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. On this //44-) day oflanuary , 200 before me a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared Zan9es /V1. f I tzer. r , to me known to be the President of Pi f zer l-)ornes Inc. , a shin t0 corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged it to e the free and voluntary act of said corporation, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument, and on oath stated that he/was authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal the day and year first above written. A J, GE •/3!F' ''h A I (seal) f ;'- OTAi . ' NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the State of ' Re rt�Oh '°UBLto Washington, residing at op WAS N\v y commission expires: 6-I6-08 a.. Name: Alice A. D lacy , 200 r‘ DATED this By: Print Name: Its: irr GRANTEE: CITY of TUKWILA STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING day of j (� , � r�r , 200p James Morrow Public Works Director On this day, before me personally appeared JIM MORROW to me known to be the PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR for the City of Tukwila, and executed this instrument on behalf of the City of Tukwila in his capacity as PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR and acknowledged that he is authorized to do so at his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and official seal tie day and year first above written. seal •• v. 1:,/ F i. � r ( ) 0 No A,qy 9 N; C iliBLIG . ' O_ i 15* 1.60 .. �F ` WAg N� a te _0. i) �l i ce A. D ea cy Name: NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the State of Washington, residing at Reh --vn My commission expires: 6-112— OS z 1 z • w i O 0 N co w J W 0 L Q co P I I- w z z � 1- 0 Z IL al U� o 1- w w L I O .z o 1- z March 6, 2006 John Tamburelli 1201 Monster Rd SW, Ste 320 Renton, WA 98055 Dear Mr. Tamburelli: city of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director RE: Correction Letter #1 to Revision #2 Development Permit Application Number D04 -421 Pitzer Construction, Lot 1— 4837 S 150 ST This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your development permit(s) can be approved. All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the same time and reflected on your drawings. I have enclosed comments from the Public Workds Department. At this time the Building, Fire, and Planning Departments have no comments. Public Works Department: L. Jill Mosqueda, at (206) 431 -2449, if you have questions regarding the attached memo. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Please address the attached comments in an itemized format with applicable revised plans, specifications, and /or other documentation. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans, specifications and /or other documentation be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal, a `Revision Submittal Sheet' must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Corrections /revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 433 -7165. Sincerely, encl rshall it Technician xc: File No. D04 -421 Aiti( P:Vennifer\Correction Lctters\2004\D04.421 Correction Ltr #1 Revision #2.DOC jem 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 z re w 00 N0 . J = H U � w u_ I � z = o w ~ w C.) 0 - 0 I-- w u1 � U. 6 aI o 1- z Permit #: CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards 004 -421 Revision #2 Project Name: Pitzer Homes 4837 S 150 St Review #: 1 Date: 03.02.06 Reviewer: L. Jill Mosqueda, P.E. The City Of Tukwila Public Works Department (PW) has the following comments regarding your application for the above permit. Please contact me at 206.431.2449, if you have any questions. 1. All revisions shall be made to the approved set of plans. PW received an approval for a revision from WD125, but did not receive the revised plan set. Please provide your revision to the approved set of plans along with your approval from WD125. 2. Please note that this revision may change your bond and pavement mitigation requirements. 3. Please note that each revision to a permit is charged a fee. Z QQ g . JU 00 J = U) U. w 0 � N a z � i- O Z I- w • o O N • 1- wW 'I O ..z w = , O ~ z March 6, 2006 John Tamburelli 1201 Monster Rd SW, Ste 320 Renton, WA 98055 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director RE: Correction Letter #1 to Revision #1 Development Permit Application Number D04 -421 Pitzer Construction, Lot 1— 4837 S 150 ST Dear Mr. Tamburelli: This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your development permit(s) can be approved. All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the same time and reflected on your drawings. I have enclosed comments from the Public Workds Department. At this time the Building, Fire, and Planning Departments have no comments. Public Works Department: L. Jill Mosqueda, at (206) 431 -2449, if you have questions regarding the attached memo. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Please address the attached comments in an itemized format with applicable revised plans, specifications, and /or other documentation. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans, specifications and /or other documentation be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal, a `Revision Submittal Sheet'• must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Corrections /revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 433 -7165. Sincerely, encl arshall t hnician xc: File No. D04 -421 P:Vennifer?Correction Letters\2004\D04 -42I Correction Ltr Revision tiI.DOC jcm 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Permit #: CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Development Guidelines and Design and Construction Standards D04 -421 Revision #1 Project Name: Pitzer Homes 4837 S 150 St Review #: 1 Date: 03.02.06 Reviewer: L. Jill Mosqueda, P.E. The City Of Tukwila Public Works Department (PW) has the following comments regarding your application for the above permit. Please contact me at 206.431.2449, if you have any questions. 1. All revisions shall be made to the approved set of plans. PW received an approval for a revision from ValVue Sewer, but did not receive the revised plan set. Please provide your revision to the approved set of plans along with your approval from ValVue Sewer. 2. Please note that this revision may change your bond and pavement mitigation requirements. 3. Please note that each revision to a permit is charged a fee. z re w Jo 00 w = cn ~ w 2 g < I °' f- _ z o w ~ • w U � O N w W lii Z 0 z October 26, 2005 John Tamburelli 1201 Monster Rd SW, Ste 230 Renton, WA 98055 RE: CORRECTION LETTER #2 Development Permit Application Number D04 -421 Pitzer Construction, Lot 1— 4837 S 150 ST Dear Mr. Tamburelli: This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your development permit(s) can be approved. All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the same time and reflected on your drawings. I have enclosed comments from the Planning Department. At this time the Building, Fire, and Public Works Departments : have no comments. Plannint Department: Brandon Miles, at (206) 431 -3684, if you have questions regarding the attached memo. Please address the attached comments in an itemized format with applicable revised plans, specifications, and /or other documentation. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans, specifications and /or other documentation be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal, a `Revision Submittal Sheet' must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Corrections /revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messeneer service. If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 433 -7165. encl JOV1,54 arshall hnician xc: File No. D04 -421 P: Jennifer\Correction Letters \D04 -42 { Correction Ltr #2.DOC jem City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 DATE: CONTACT: RE: ADDRESS: ZONING: October 21, 2005 John Tambruelli D04 -421 4837 S. 150 Street Low Density Residential (LDR) PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS Planning Division of DCD has reviewed the above permit revisions that were submitted on September 27, 2005. Planning has reviewed the revision and the application cannot be approved. Sheet C1.3 shows that two significant trees will be removed from the site. These trees are located on a steep slope and a tree- clearing permit must be submitted and approved by the City for the removal of these trees. Sheet C1.2 shows a large 30 -inch caliper tree that will be retained on the site. The general rule for protecting the tree is to install a tree protection fence one foot away from the tree for every inch in diameter of the tree. Using this standard, construction activities will be occurring within the tree protection area. You may want to consider relocating the house to the northeast in order to reduce the impact to the tree's root system. If you choose to leave the house in its current location as part of the tree clearing permit an arborist report must be submitted evaluating the impacts of the construction on the large 30 inch caliper trees and provide any recommendations on measures to preserve and protect the tree. May 19, 2005 Mr. John Tamburelli 1201 Monster Road S.W., Ste. 320 Renton, Washington 98055 Dear John: Planning Department: Building Department: Public Works Department: Sincerely, Stefania Spencer Permit Technician encl xc: File No. D04 -421 City of Tukwila If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 433 -7165. Department of Community Development RE: CORRECTION LETTER #1 Development Permit Application Number D04 -421 Pitzer Construction — Lot #1 — 4837 South 150 Street sks Page 1 T :\Links \Docs \D04 -42 I \D04 -42 I - Correction Letter # I . DOC 05/19/2005 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your development permit(s) can be approved. All correction requests from each department must be addressed at the same time and reflected on your drawings. I have enclosed comments from the Building, Public Works and Planning Departments. At this time, the Fire Department has no comments. Brandon Miles, at (206) 431 -3684, if you have questions regarding the attached memo. Allen Johannessen, at (206) 433 -7163, if you have questions regarding the attached memo. Jill Mosqueda, at (206) 431 -2449, if you have questions regarding the attached memo. Please address the attached comments in an itemized format with applicable revised plans, specifications, and /or other documentation. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans, specifications and /or other documentation be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal, a `Revision Submittal Sheet' must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Corrections /revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenzer service. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 ' 7f! MM. NUd !6:Yi+Aha+`.'.klM7MMwgwe+e+in' SA A Var. nH. nwr. y.• vnhwu .w..n.siinF+Ft"+"" --., ... DATE: CONTACT: RE: ADDRESS: city of Tukwila Department of Community Development May 12, 2005 Mr. John Tamburelli D04 -421 4837 S. 150 Street. PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS The Planning Division of DCD has reviewed the above permit application that was submitted on May 6, 2005. The wetland report submitted is insufficient for staff. Please see the comments from the City's Urban Environmentalist, regarding the report and sensitive areas on the property. Please note that this project is not vested under the City's previous Sensitive Area Overlay regulations and must meet the City's current regulations. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 MEMORANDUM May 12, 2005 5. The watercourse(s) should be classified according to Tukwila's SAO. /) p ,v- i.70 GA✓ TO: Brandon Miles FROM: Sandra Whiting RE: Guillermo Property, 4837 S. 150 D04 -421, Wetland Delineation Report I have reviewed the Wetland Delineation Report for the above - referenced property. The report is not acceptable as written. Here are my comments. 1. An explanation should be provided of what "DMMC ", in footnote 1 on page 1, means and how it applies to the Tukwila SAO. 2. While it is commendable that the wetland was classified under the Department of Ecology Wetland Rating System, the wetland also needs to be classified under Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance. It appears that either an obsolete version of Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance or some other jurisdiction's Sensitive Areas Ordinance was referenced to explain regulatory standards and to classify the wetland and determine the regulatory buffer. The information provided in Appendix 1, Section E, "Wetland Regulation and Rating Standards" is not correct. The report author should obtain a copy of the current SAO (effective December 2004) and the referenced section should be re- written to take into account the City's current requirements and prohibitions. 3. It appears that the report author did not consult the Tukwila Sensitive Areas Map to determine the preliminary classification of the wetland or the watercourse(s) or to obtain information for the Ecology wetland rating process. For example, the Sensitive Areas Map shows that there are at least 3 wetlands within a half -mile of the wetland, which would change the habitat score slightly, although it would not change the classification. 4. Page 2 of the report states that the "watercourse is situated entirely offsite ", yet Figure 5 shows a watercourse on the subject property. This needs to be clarified. 6. Page 3 of the report states that the size of the wetland is provided on the wetland rating form provided in Appendix 4. I could find no information in the form regarding the size of the wetland. 7. What is the Cowardin classification of the wetland? This is not stated anywhere in the report, and can only be guessed at by reviewing data sheets and the rating form. 13 /1;04 1,14 8. The report fails to explain or provide a site plan showing the proposed development and does not discuss the potential impacts of the development to the wetland, the watercourse or the buffer. Per TMC 18.45, sensitive area studies shall provide a description of the proposal, a site plan showing the proposed development and a stormwater management plan. In addition, the potential impacts on the sensitive area(s) need to be evaluated and discussed, along with the measures proposed to avoid or mitigate the impacts. 9. The findings section of the report should provide additional detail on the characterization of the wetland and the watercourse. Some of the information in the appendices could be brought forward. Information important to include is: hydrogeomorphic classification, Cowardin classification, Ecology classification, discussion of wetland functions, size of wetland and size of the portion of the wetland on the subject property, stream characterization, and quality /condition of the buffers. 10. Page 3 of the report states that Figure 5 indicates trees to be saved. This information was not found on the drawing. 11. There is an apparent discrepancy on the Field Data Form for TP1. Although the form indicates that 80% of the dominant plants are hydrophytic, and the plot was deemed to meet the criterion for hydrophytic vegetation, the rationale for the determination was "Dominants are not hydrophytes". This makes no sense. Was this a typographical error? 12. There is another discrepancy on the same Field Data Form under soils. The form indicates the presence of Dupont Muck, but this soil series is not mentioned as an inclusion in the Alderwood gravelly sandy loam. Where did this soil type come from? 13. Also on the Field Data form for Test Pit 1— is the soil a histosol or a hystic epipedon? Both categories are marked but it can't be both at the same time. In the rationale section of the form, it is called a histosol. Obviously either classification still makes it a hydric soil, but the category should be corrected. z 1 z w U 00 -I I- 0u w g Q CO I w Z = z0 O N OH w uj F� u- .. z w co O~ z • J • Page 1 Building Division Review Memo Date: May 16, 2005 Project Name: Pitzer Construction Lot #1 Permit #: D04 -421 Plan Review: Allen Johannessen, Plans Examiner Tukwila Building Division Allen Johannessen, Plan Examiner A Building Division plan review has been conducted on the subject permit application. Please address the following comments in an itemized format with revised plans, specifications and /or other applicable documentation. PLAN SUBMITTALS: (Min. size 11x17 to maximum size of 24x36; all sheets shall be the same size). (Drawing and structural calculations sheets shall be original signed wet stamp, not copied.) 1 The structural details on (sheet S2) do not show a reference to the two front garages assumed (L R P) wall panels. Provide a design and details for the two wall panels or clarify otherwise. 2 The code references in "General Notes" (sheet 1) refers to the 1997 edition and the City Of Kent design Criteria. The City of Tukwila does not recognize the City Of Kent design Criteria. In addition, the Washington State Energy Code table is outdated. A complete review of the Code Text should be completed and revised as necessary. 3 The "Structural notes on (sheet S2) do not accurately reflect the current code. The Washington State has adopted the third printing of the 2003 IBC. Example of changes are: the current Climatic and Geographic Design Criteria is now 85 MPH wind and Seismic zone is D. A complete review of the Code Text should be completed and revised as necessary. 4 The interior garage door shown as swinging into the garage does not meet code requirements. This would be acceptable as long as there is a minimum 3 -foot x 3 -foot landing inside of the garage or reverse the door swing to swing inside the house. Revise the drawings to meet the code requirement. (R311.54) Should there be questions concerning the above requirements, contact the Building Division at 206 -431- 3670. No further comments at this time. z 1 z et LI -JU O 0 w 0 CO la I LL w 0 2 LL =W _ z 1- O Z ~ U O O N O 1— W W L I O co ..z 0 0/ z December 6, 2004 Dear John: Sincerely, Stefania Spencer Permit Technician Enclosures File: Permit File No. D04 -421 Mr. John Tamburelli Davis Real Estate 1201 Monster Road SW, Suite 320 Renton, Washington 98055 city of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director RE: Letter of Incomplete Application # 1 Development Permit Application D04 -421 Pitzer Construction — Lot #1 — 4837 South 150 Street This letter is to inform you that your application received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center on November 23, 2004, is determined to be incomplete. Before your application can continue the plan review process the following items need to be addressed: Planning Department: Brandon Miles, at 206 431 -3684, if you have questions regarding the attached memo. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Please address the above comments in an itemized format with applicable revised plans, specifications, and/or other documentation. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans, specifications and/or other documentation be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. In order to better expedite your resubmittal a `Revision Submittal Sheet' must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Revisions must be made in person and rvill not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions, please contact me at the Permit Center at (206) 433 -7165. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 i ;?r1�fiVx7f.(xYk>':k}++iudr't."r ir�'.tb� }fi:.'.W+ -tJ4.4 "i *"r•'"J' 4 Y .1,, l akM,",ul,} V7a : •s�4Y1+L DATE: CONTACT: RE: ADDRESS: City of Tukwila November 30, 2004 John Tamburelli D04 -421 4837 S. 150 St PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS Department of Community Development Please review the following comments listed below and submit your revisions accordingly. If you have any questions on the requested revisions, Brandon Miles is the planner assigned to the file and can be reached at (206) 431 -3684. 1. Please submit a wetland report prepared by a qualified wetland biologist that explains the delineation and type of wetland and watercourse shown on the survey map. Refer to attached Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 18.45 for regulations pertaining to wetlands and watercourses. 2. The subject site contains steep slopes. A geo- technical report prepared by a certified geotechnical engineer is required for any development on steep slopes. Refer to attached guidelines and TMC 18.45.080 (E), for the requirements for geotechnical report. Note: The City is currently updating its regulations regarding wetlands, watercourses, and slopes. Your application is currently incomplete. In order to be vested under existing City regulations you must submit a complete application by the effective date of the new regulations. If a complete application is not submitted by the effective date of the new regulations your project will have to comply with the new regulations. 3. Label all significant trees to be removed as part of this development. Clearing of trees on any steep sloes is subject to tree regulations of TMC Chapter 18.54. Significant trees are defined as all trees expect cottonwoods that are 4 inches in caliper measured 4.5 feet above grade. Also, refer to TMC 18.54.080 for more information related to trees that must be shown on the survey. Also see TMC 18.54.130 for criteria to be used to authorize removal of significant trees on steep slopes, specifically refer to the replacement tree ratios and sizes for replacement of trees. .1P)r 44i JWY:As,:lk�!:.A.!nN'x •�Nl+w n'n4 KabaJ WY:malcat +.1o4: Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D04 -421 DATE: 08 -16 -06 PROJECT NAME: PITZER HOMES, LOT 1 SITE ADDRESS: 4837 S 150 ST Original Plan Submittal Response to Correction Letter # Response to Incomplete Letter # X Revision # 4 After Permit Issued L DEPARTMENTS: Buil Public Works ision DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Complete Comments: Please Route TUES/THURS ROUTING: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: Documents/routing slip.doc 2.28 -02 PERMIT COORD CO PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP Fire Prevention 1 ,K 1 Structural Incomplete n Permit Center Use Only INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED: Structural Review Required APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: Approved n Approved with Conditions Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: n Planning Division Fl Permit Coordinator Not Applicable No further Review Required DATE: Not Approved (attach comments) DATE: n DUE DATE: 08-17-06 n DUE DATE: 09-14-06 Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: z r w QQ � JU O 0 N 0 CO ILI -_ w 0 gQ = • d w z w • w U � O — O I— w u.l O w z U = O~ z ACTIVITY NUMBER: D04 -421 PROJECT NAME: PITZER CONSTRUCTION, LOT 1 SITE ADDRESS: 4837 S 150 ST DATE: 08 -11 -06 Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter # X Response to Correction Letter # 1 X Revision # 1 & 2 After Permit Issued DEPARTMENTS: Building Division n Public Works WI Al 0- Complete Comments: Please Route TUES/THURS ROUTING: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: Documenishouling slip.doc 2-28-02 PERMIT COORD COPY PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP Fire Prevention Structural DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Incomplete n Approved 1/i Approved with Conditions Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: C n Planning Division Permit Coordinator U DUE DATE: 08-15-06 Not Applicable n Permit Center Use Only INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED: LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: Structural Review Required E No further Review Required DATE: DUE DATE: 09-1 2-06 Not Approved (attach comments) n DATE: Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: z Z J o O 0 c o al H (0 w w 0 La = w z± � z ~ ui n 0 O - O I— W W X IL O Iii Z O ~ z ACTIVITY NUMBER: D04 -421 DATE: 08 -10 -06 PROJECT NAME: PITZER CONSTRUCTION, LOT 1 SITE ADDRESS: 4837 S 150 ST Original Plan Submittal / J Response to IncompJ t Letter # X Response to Correction Letter # 1 X Revision # ,2 After Permit Issued DEPARTMENTS: Building Division Puplic Works DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Complete Comments: Permit Center Use Only INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED: Departments determined incomplete: TUES/THURS ROUTING: Please Route n Structur. Review Required ❑ No further Review Required REVIEWER'S INITIALS: APPROVALS OR COR ECTIONS: Approved n Approved with Conditions Notation: Documentshouting slip.doc 2.28 -02 REVIEWER'S I TIALS: PERMIT COORD COPY PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP n Fire Prevention Structural Incomplete Not Applicable Bldg ❑V Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: n Planning Division n Permit Coordinator LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED: DATE: Not Approved (attach comments) DATE: DUE DATE: 08-15-06 DUE DATE: 09-12-06 Permit. Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: z Z w tr 6 U 0O 0 w= • w w O 2 • ? = ▪ w z � w • w U � O N O I— wW I' O w z U = O H- z .::.v;..:isa•A +>+>: tic.. ,r:�:.i:��.�,;.:. }:11:.'pSZwut: ACTIVITY NUMBER: D04 -421 PROJECT NAME: PITZER CONSTRUCTION, LOT 1 SITE ADDRESS: 4837 S 150 ST DEPARTMENTS: Building Division n Public Works Comments: PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP Original Plan Submittal Response to Correction Letter # DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Complete R Incomplete n Permit Center Use Only INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED: LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: TUES/THURS ROUT G: Please Route Structural Review Required REVIEWER'S INITIALS: APPROVALS Ol'CORRECTIONS: Fire Prevention Structural Approved VI Approved with Conditions Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: Documents/routing slip.doc 2.28 -02 PERMIT COORD COPY Response to Incomplete Letter # X Revision # 3 After Permit Issued DUE DATE: 08-10-06 No further Review Required DATE: DATE: 08 -09 -06 Planning Division C Permit Coordinator p Not Applicable DUE DATE: 09 -07-06 Not Approved (attach comments) DATE: n Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: z I z J U 00 c o J I—. w 0 u_ Q co I CI z 2 z • w U O O — O I— wW H 2 ..z w U = O~ z D EPARTM EN Ts Building Division n Complete Comments: REVIB/ E 'S INITIALS Documentslrouting dip.doc 2 -28 -02 PLAN RBV/ROUTING SUP ACTIVITY NUMBER: D04 - 421 PRO.RCT NAME Pitzer Construction — Lot #1 SITEADD REM 4837 S150 St Original Plan Submittal DATE 02/24/06 Response to Incomplete Letter # Response to Correction Letter # X Revision # 2 After Permit Is Issued Fire Prevention n Public1Wor�j,,s eitivrid ,o(a Structural ❑ Permit Coordinator DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS (Tues., Thurs.) APPROVALS O R CO RRECTI O N & Incomplete n Planning Division n DUE DATE 02/28/06 Not Applicable E Permit Center Use Only INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED: LITTER OF CO M PLETBV E5S MAI LID: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Pre ❑ Fing ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials TU ESITH U RS ROUTI G: Pl ease Route Structural Review Required n No further Review Required n DATE DUE DATE 03/28/06 Approved El Approved with Conditionsn Not App roved ( attach comments) Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS DATE Permit Center Use Only CORRECT] ON LETTER MAI LED: 'UP •Ll Departments issued corrections Bldg ❑ Pre ❑ Ping ❑ PNK Staff Initials: z z w re g 6 -i U 00 N CO 11.1 I_ j- U) LL w g � co LL Q = z � z0 w U � N oI- ww U. 3 ..z w U= O ~ z .W.ssi; till';::;:, �:: s: itc._...;: iav:! ti°, '4��.s`+ia�;w:,.�w<!rt::.::ISr z'l':::+k*::b:ixui &;r vz: .;4: ry.:'tfi.,,Gla�'. ACTIVITY NUMBER: D 04 -421 DATE 02/24/06 PRO.ECT NAME Pitzer Construction — Lot #1 SITE ADDRESS 4837 S 150 St Original Ran Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter # Response to Correction Letter # X Revision # 1 After Permit Is Issued DB'ARTM ENTR Building Division ❑ Public Works i Gqd'� DETERMINATION OFCOMPLETBVESS (Tues., Thurs.) Complete Documents/routing dip.doc 2 -28 -02 PLAN REV I B/V I RO U TI N G SU P 44-Olo Fire Prevention ❑ Planning Division n Structural Incomplete ❑ Permit Center Use Only CORRBfl1ON LETTER MAI LED: V2 (l 'DS Departments issued corrections Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Fing ❑ I I Permit Coordinator Poix 1r DUE DATE 02/28/06 Not Applicable ❑ Comments Permit Center Use Only INCOMPLETE LETTER M AI L®: LETTER O F CO M PLETBV ESS M AI LED: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Baff Initials TU ESITH U RS ROUT! G: Please Route Structural Review Required n No further Review Required ❑ REVIEWER'S INITIALS DATE APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS DUE DATE 03/28/06 Approved ❑ Approved with Conditionsn Not Approved (attach comments) F1 Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS DATE Staff Initials_` ACTIVITY NUMBER: D04 -421 PROJECT NAME: PITZER CONSTRUCTION, LOT 1 SITE ADDRESS: 4837 S 150 ST DATE: 11 -18 -05 Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter # X Response to Correction Letter # 2 Revision # After Permit Issued DEPARTMENTS: Building Division Public Works Complete Comments: Documents/routing slip.doc 2.28 -02 ouul PERMIT COORD COPY PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP n n Fire Prevention Structural DETERMINATI9N OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Incomplete Permit Center Use Only INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED: TUES /THURS ROU ING: Please Route Structural Review Required REVIEWER'S INITIALS: APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: Approved n Approved with Conditions Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: n n P ng Division Permit Coordinator n DUE DATE: 11-22-05 Not Applicable n No further Review Required DATE: DATE: n DUE DATE: 12-20-05 Not Approved (attach comments) n Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: z Z w CC J U 00 w i (J) w 2 J u..j a = w H ZF- i— 0 Z I— • w U � O - • F- w W ti O w z U I 0 ~ z ACTIVITY NUMBER: D04 -421 PROJECT NAME: PITZER CONSTRUCTION — LOT #1 SITE ADDRESS: 4837 S 150 ST Original Plan Submittal X Response to Correction Letter # 1 DATE: 09 -27 -05 Response to Incomplete Letter # Revision # After Permit Issued DEPARTMENTS: 1'11 . , U 1 ref Buil�ltg ivision Public Works 9111 / 1G DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Complete Comments: " PERMIT COORD COPY PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP Permit Center Use Only INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED: LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: TUES/THURS ROUTI G: Please Route Structural Review Required REVIEWER'S INITIALS: Documents/routing slip.doc 2-28-02 APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: Fire Prevention n Structural Incomplete n DATE: P anning Division 6111 1 04 Permit Coordinator n DUE DATE: 09-29-05 Not Applicable No further Review Required DUE DATE: 10-27-05 Approved n Approved with Conditions Not Approved (attach comments) Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DATE: Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: Bldg ❑ Fire 0 Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: ■ z • z cc w QQ J U O 0 co O (0 ILI J L- (0 LA.. w � = w H = z � w • w 0 O — O I— w W O ..z w co O~ z ,61,4140,0 41:e ;b�NF�': ?Y:' . 'tee• ".s"alltdl�¢l. '.. :'At:7+� Bull g Divison Public Works W) I' /) 1lYll�/r� Complete D o cum entdrouting dip.doc 2-28-02 PERMIT COORD COP"( PLAN REVIBN/ROUTING SUP ACTIVITY NUMBER: D04 -421 DATE 5-6 -05 PROJECT NAME PITZHR CONSTRUCTION - LOT #1 SITEADDRESS 4837 S 150 ST Original Ran Submittal _.(._Response to Incomplete Letter # 1 Response to Correction Letter # Revision # After Permit Issued APPROVALS O R CO RRE TI O N S• Fire Prevention Structural f7FrFRMINATION OF COMPI FrENF (Tues., Thurs.) Incomplete ri r ^� k n REVIEWER'S IN ITIALS PI � �lL'l (I 1iitt cc nning Division Permit Coordinator ft DUEDATE 5 -10 -05 Not Applicable I I Comments: Permit Center Use Only I N CO M P L E T E M A I LETTER L®• LETTER OF CO M PLETEN ESS M AI L® Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ RN ❑ Staff Initials: TUESITHURSROUT G: y� r Please Route Structural Review Required I I No further Review Required I. REVIEWER'S INITIALS DATE DUEDATE 6 -7-05 Approved I Approved with Conditions) I Not Approved (attach comments) U I Notation DATE Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETT'ER MAI LED • S 9*-6° Departments issued corrections: Bldg Fire ❑ Ping PW Staff Initial z • z cc 1 1 QQ � J U O 0 U) J H w ga- Q co I I _ La z = 0 z • w • N o � w I - u. O Z w 0 z ..Ll..h 4.44' vY "�yLi 'gut >w+'atta4l+i;:'ir 4fk4i PERMIT COORD COPY PLAN REVIEW /ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER: D04 -421 DATE: 11 -23 -04 PROJECT NAME: PITZER CONSTRUCTION - LOT 1 SITE ADDRESS: 4837 SOUTH 150 STREET X Original Plan Submittal Response to Incomplete Letter # Response to Correction Letter # Revision #_afterlbefore permit is issued DEPARTMENTS: 5( Atv Building Division © Fire Prevention ❑ Public Works [i] Structural ❑ P Division fig-!20 PI Permit Coordinator DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thu s.) DUE DATE: 11 -30 -04 Complete ❑ Comments: Permit Center Use Only INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED: f° "(0 'p y LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ PIng. PW.er Staff Initials: SseC TUES /THURS ROUTING: Please Route ❑ Structural Review Required ❑ No further Review Required ❑ REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DATE: APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: Approved ❑ Approved with Conditions ❑ Not Approved (attach comments) ❑ Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: Permit Center Use Only CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: Bldg ❑ Fire ❑ Ping ❑ PW ❑ Staff Initials: Documents /routing slIp.doc 2-28-02 Incomplete Not Applicable ❑ DUE DATE: 12 -28 -04 PERMIT COORD COPY DATE: z _� iH W � QQ 2 J U 0 w co u.1 J I- uJ co = d u1 Z s 1— O W ~ uj U� O — O H w W u. O W Z U= O~ z iNAC. Y•' 7Q?k+ Is�LdWir' vt�t�^ X. tr811l tj +likCN:3:aA.7F+R� �. , 0, ;) 3 to G I A 1 -1- 1 NI i i/ I / 1/ V— Summary of Revision: /UeW I ;.J ( +f-Nr se ,-v l -e /,) - ( -u ( - ) / 5' ) 1 6,2 9 - a U [<- i • ' j' • Received By: Deri,,,;?/ D Cohn f mcvs3luit , No. I uate Received Staff Initials i 1 Staff Initials atarr Uate Initials ( Issued O I is H 1.., "Staff Initials 1 6,2 9 - a U [<- i GL ' j' Received By: Summary of Revision: - 1 • /70 , F . � '' /='b' C .z. tL r- ) �d � c: vf: 1 v��t 1111111110 , __.. Received By: • Revision No. Date Received Staff Initials Date Issued Staff Initials 01 01 0' O I is H 1.., Summary of Revision: r ,Ui A .0A i p eril ` r rtiaj vq , ar 6 U ,i 0 rJbb') (win y ,_ Summary of Revision: Revision No. Date Received Staff Initials Date 1 Issued Staff Initials �.oa...rmr I I Summary of Revision: Received By: PROJECT NAME: PERM NO:. / Site Address: 3 I 15o S f- - -- Origirwr Issue Date: REVISION LOG • Revision • No. Revision No. Summary of Revision: Date Received Date Received .Ik/ 1& tr '-' y� • Staff Initials Staff Initials Date Issued (please print) (please print) Staff • Initial Received By: _JJG) ti1'e / 0 (0 1 ? 0 Date Issued ot41z I (please print) Staff Initials Received Bye ,„ 1 )/ / � � ✓ at 1. Y (please print) (please print) ru. Date: M i I( i ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ❑ Response to Correction Letter # Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: Entered in Permits Plus on City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 -431 -3670 Fax: 206 -431 -3665 Web site: http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us \applications\forms- applications on linelrevision submittal Created: 8 -13 -2004 Revised: Plan Check/Permit Number: k 'IVe c PAO Sheet Number(s): "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by:/ �IJr ,�Ji(a Steven M Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. GtY'1rD AUG 1 6 2006 PERMIT CENTER Phone Number: � � '20(0 (Q Summary of Revision: II ?rt:7vtal- �� G� L ATtr. rt-(11 i Yl i ot L.I C1 l I tx r vt id lAindtA. - 67taA ' seA II ifftWAMIMINFATIALIMA Well A ,A7h■ 11111,11171MMININIMININIVEllapaTimpr Z � re U/ 2 J U tn0 co w J u. 1—' w0 0} g J LL. < = • d • w z = F— O w ~ U Q O N O H 111 u Z ui U = 0 l ' z City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206- 431 -3665 Web site: http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Date: en'' 1(10 Plan Check/Permit Number: t — t 2 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # Response to Correction Letter # 7''" Revision # ti after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. CITYpF AUG 1 2 006 P6744417 CENTER Project Name: 7� (j0 P 1 V Project Address: L{ 4/) l 1 c5T Contact Person: - PAP k a, Phone Number: -S 24(e — (i 1 Summary of Revision: Lay .Alta v- 16 Qt- (A . - A M l,vCA-r D NS P11 0 VLX17 Vti P( N y-7\-/ \I,t1 V L4 . Sheet Number(s): "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit / Center " by: Entered in Permits Plus on \applications\forms- applications on line\revision submittal . Created: 8 -13 -2004 Revised: i+:«��W:dti:44.4 ,144 ., dtc+ii' 4XUtli Z • Z �W -JU U O co w N L w 0 u Q = l - w Z = • 1— 0 Z w U� rn o I w iz w U = O ~ Z Project Name: Created: 8 -13 -2004 Revised: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: OM d 0 Plan Check/Permit Number: ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # 9 1 Response to Correction Letter # I it) e u LS; a ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner 2 2er ( act) - 1,�t -# Project Address: Yes.---7 6 / Sc Contact Person: R(.ISS 414Sfi K) Summary of Revision: As -bu.i l -t c o c r Phone Number: ,0(•-) -,� 9 -'/ 7 O V RECEIVED KW11 A AUK 1 0 2006 PERMIT Ct Steven M Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Sheet Number(s): "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date / of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: 1') Entered in Permits Plus on C)// /d 4 \applications\forms- applications on line\revision submittal Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: tg-9 - a (o Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us City of Tukwila ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ❑ Response to Correction Letter # Revision # 'j after Permit is Issued Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner . Loo 4332 s1 O4‘ 54 L4 Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: p ti ;e \ Q (r)1toA o f Summary of Revision: ( lac e d `) 6 1'1 Co ✓Pe c/' Sheet Number(s): e tit een n 7 7"v "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date o Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by Entered in Permits Plus on \applications\forms- applications on line\revision submittal Created: 8 -13 -2004 Revised: Plan ChecWPermit Number: Cry rr ° c revision Phone Number: Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director RECEIVED CITY OF TIJKW/LA AUG 0 9 2006 PERMIT CENTER Y'eaJ w6vy a 4•d d V i''‘ // z Z � W J U 00 N 0 Ill � O LL w 0 2 g Q = • d w Z = 1- z w • w C.) O - o I- w w u- O w U = z Date: N City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 -431 -3665 Web site: http : / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Plan Check/Permit Number: y- 6 l ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ❑ Response to Correction Letter # ® Revision # a after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: t'Le r ((gin St (LAC 'N'C,Y - )- L -# Project Address: 6 /6 3 :5 I C `lA S f Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Contact Person: t,! SS .-u sfi n Phone Number: ,901.. - t( Y7 Summary of Revision: 1 flt o ( , — /te v' Se i ()CC e I ( (le . 1 Lse it c'k - o t _ ( /0-nc ,f) ('ucj -(1C 4 Sl1oLL('d r si c es r)-( ,S I`;c:, c �E J it ED OTT`, OF TUKW to FEB 2 4 2006 Sheet Number(s): "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: 00 ❑ Entered in Permits Plus on 0;2/25 - b \applications\forms- applications on Iine\revision submittal Created: 8 -13 -2004 Revised: .w.x..v,u 46 (4+Y. 40∎S; 410414).144 i4,thca: ;A z • Z r4 W QQ � -J O 0 (00 ul J = I— fn LL w 0 u. < (0 d I=— _ Z H 0 Z t~ LIJ U O N O I- 111 u j gr.O Cli 2 , O ~ z Date: Ov9 / �- 5 1 0 Project Name: Project Address: Contact Person: Created: 8 -13 -2004 Revised: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 -431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: http://www.citulcwila.wa.us Plan Check/Permit Number: 1 ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ❑ Response to Correction Letter # E1 Revision # / after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner , t -e r (Dl1:S t(u C'f i o r�1 /27 JUGst ,51 ue F /etc (ie Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: Er Entered in Permits Plus on Oella3 -10 \applications\forms- applications on line\revision submittal —t J tt1 Steven M Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Phone Number: / 736 6 f-,9 Summary of Revision: 2 ')S±c I I r? 0 1,F ,3" f U C. .4 tc o le-cA '1 el_l o t1 61 �' c� /G' (J C' .110CtA ki ref �� 150 St , � r(r� , No �; 5 � ha It o e . Ut t Ltn((r �" (ri tie c.c a. r RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWIIA FEB 2 i 2006 PERMIT CENTER Sheet Number(s): "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision z Z w Q • � J O O 0 c 0 J = I-- lL w 0 gQ d I— al ' Z I— 0 Z U 0 O N o w W u - O .. z U N F- O z City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 -431 -3670 Fax: 206- 431 -3665 Web site: http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. the mail, flux, etc. Date: /I oc Plan Check/Permit Number: ❑ Response to Incomplete Letter # ® Response to Correction Letter ,# 2 ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued ❑ Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director REVISION SUBMITTAL Revisions will not be accepted through DO4 -4+2' yam( cm OF uT� N 0 V 1 8 2005 PERMIT CENTER Project Name: PITZER CONSTRUCTION, LOT 1 Project Address: 4837 S 150 ST Contact Person: John Tamburelli Phone Number (2-0b ) 9,.o -o Summary of Revision: , '3 p " w Nph lea 1..c 1 4 r.e vt,v t 1 /fl ka 06/riled .45 pocePed c 0541v 4 ,a r /p . .41 ? 'l; h pre peen/idea C,c J Loos 19 Q ebt eit1 1.7 (''ons.)-"z -1,Pi (� 1'M a�.: , gertke, ) f ,., Sheet Number(s): "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: IA Entered in Permits Plus on 1 ti \applications \t'orms - applications on line\revisiun submittal Created: 8 -13 -2004 Revised: z 1 i '~ w JU 00 U) UJ J =.. w J u. N d =w z � Z F- ul 0 O - o I- w tu 1 'O w Z U = 0 z Date: 77/(23- City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Web site: http : / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us AtcervI l�F ry S E P 6 20(frJEP 2 7 2005 RMIT CE jFRMIT CENTE REVISION SUBMITTAL I Revision submittals must be submitted in person at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Response to Incomplete Letter # Response to Correction Letter # Revision # after Permit is Issued Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: PITZER CONSTRUCTION - LOT #1 Project Address: 4837 South 150 Street Contact Person: John Tamburelli Phone Number: (2Ca' Summary of Revision: 4 0 k 5 e v 1 sid mil/ ..-1 4 4t, 1p, e l,/ 'A/ k/ C0/ 54e /a h /r-t Pb. Plan Check/Permit Number: D04 -421 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director AEC OF 1V� Sheet Number(s): "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision Received,at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: Entered in Permits Plus on \applications\forms- applications on line\revision submittal Created: 8 -13 -2004 Revised: 1 LU .......,!.'. ie}: L; a.;. ss. �3): d, c, :�:rarw�'.vi:au..uu;:titY.A:cww .Y7y." y.�?vw.w�rati> +sue m..S,mr,ti� w.t:+tsro: nMlTg�1M'. r City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 Fax: 206 -431 -3665 Web site: http: / /www.ci.tukwila.wa.us Revision submittals must be submitted in person: at the Permit Center. Revisions will not be accepted through the mail, fax, etc. Date: S /6/C2,5 Plan Check/Permit Number: D04 -421 Z Response to Incomplete Letter # 1 ❑ Response to Correction Letter # ❑ Revision # after Permit is Issued El Revision requested by a City Building Inspector or Plans Examiner Project Name: PITZER CONSTRUCTION — LOT #1 Project Address: 4837 South 150 Street Contact Person: John Tamburelli Phone Number: ('c*) 92c Summary of Revision: Cop es o ' a r),..es ,p W ,e7 I n gyp. Received at the City of Tukwila Permit Center by: ig Entered in Permits Plus on 6 \applications \forms- applications on line\revision submittal Created: 8 -13 -2004 Revised: Steven M Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director I E'CEIV'ED env OP TTUKWILA MAY 0 6 2005 PERMIT CENTER Sheet Number(s): "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision including date of revision 61-Q ;4. t, i�:..�. �..,.. -.,, a isLs .r,av:til«a�sci`a::kraAdd.t i itar = ` i+ic,'.en`kG sti..M ilia' '! ;;13 z�;:tAa+1.� requirements: _opt cm' OF TUKWILA Community Development Department Permit Center 6.300 Soutiicenter Blvd.. Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98788 Silt 't dre_s atta ch rite p an `le I criptian .how` Otani " Name. 42 :: -- r gtdra - ii.. 3 _ 4 t Phone :453 -61f1 -$'b ' 3 This certificate Is for the purposes of: ig Residential Building Permit 0 Commercial/Industrial Building Permit is ; 4'4 r.' /•, >l �; •caner gent ignature V (Ilse Sops rare shoat it more mom io needed) tapplicationslwater availability i7.20031 Printed. S.1tifi3 CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY Required only if outside City of Tuitwila water district hydra t location end size of; jain 4 9 ir O Preliminary Plat O Rezone 1 1,,.I / /, / /1 I nerepy ct-riit/ that the above llltc rrriatiora is true and correct I Address: 7 6/ ^ film �� V�1J � !!"!'�j)J[ Phone: � Yu' iar-rtcic. P rc yJP c c an By Permit Center /Building Division; 206431.3670 Public Worlts Department: 206.433.0179 I Planning Division: I 206431 -3670 PERMIT NO.: Q � i T n �,.�� r , , E )i ll• '*�,IL'd�SiELTME :'1••'1'.111PerS0t� ^v.�i+ l�"t - R.;i;�iL��.: ' 1' 7E iv.�.�i 'MAW V i���� , S i�.�` �� r � i •'r. � s.,tr,'� f : >4� l O Short subdivision ❑ Other Estimated number of service connections and vriJtcr meter size(s): / Vehicular distance ote ce from nearest hydrant closest point at structure is (t Jr 0 ? " iii Area Is served by (Water Utility District): _. _A 3 240 1 1 _c©Q TAR Date '" k ii J4!"atco 4P 'r• ,,. • `;`t , imu : ; t s� • :' ffikg' rx g 1 Tnt� proposed project is v,ithin � •— lJ ( ) 2. [; a Improvements required. 3. The improvements required to upgrade the water system to bring it into compliance with the utilities' comprohonslve plan or to meat the minimum flow requirements of the project before connection and to meet 1110 Stele cross connection control 4. Based upon the improvements listed above. water can be prov eu and will be evegetate et the site with a flow of - S — gpm at 20 psi residual for a duration of 2 hours at a velocity of , S fps as documented tty the attached calculations. 5. Watet availability: [�Aoceptable service can be provided to this project r n Acceptable nervice cumuli I:r: prtivttlarl Ps'Cytrtl tanI its tilt: itnilrouurtc:ntt: 'n item 13 - aro mot. I System i3 not capable of providing af,rvtcF to this project D04 -421 S --0 4, Date it+, ✓Ws' 4-t 1 W 0OO N Nu- W 2 J u. N_ d = zo Ui c3 N_ Q WW H H Lu O O ~ Z I ` 06/22/2004 10354 "N4Nh &G rOtvq,rc' A !iF 1.6!:10Ur70.,N' ' ( ;t R O WI=ft AVAIL AU)LITY,rJON AVAlI "AiSII.ITY Pali A lit, 13,; (:. t,l Al,l,ti■ P of Certificate: Pit PuiiOng Permit Short Subdivision Pro A ppl i oan te N AJ:s ,Jsra i roves J. +L Phoo Prope dress or Approximate Loden: Tay Lot Number: PP406-04/ Legal peactiplontAttaoh Map anti Legal Description If necessary); LDTS /'+a SA 1. Dal -XXXx AkA Lori 611e4 ' JJ I I; I I■) F3„ ( „urlll,l( Pty :,U'JI,:( N(I1-13(:';) 1. Lra, Bower Service will lie provided by aide cower connection only toJ en al Mng la., Size ee Nor _.42o ,_,feet from the site and the Sower system has the c peolty to carve the proposed use, OR Q b. Gower service will require an Improvement to the sewer system f: Q (1) ^ feat of sewer duns or totem! to reach the alta; andror CI (2) the construction of a oolleotlon system an the elite; andl ]r GI (8) other (deecrttto): 2 (Miiet be completed if 1.0 above to checked) q. The sewer system improvement la In conformance with a Cow OOen, OR CI b. TM Sewer system Improvement will require a sewer oomph lra. The prapceed Pleat Ia within the corporate Waits et the DIatrI Review aaerd approval for estanalon of ooMce outside the DI OR CI b. Annexation or ORB approval will be newsier/ to provide oeM e. Cottificetee of Sewer Availability OR Use: Reeldentiai emote Family C) Relddontiel Multi- Family Como 4. tae a, OlstriicctConn the following: due prior to connection: PENT: ..tom* n C-L, ,r, two: SO 8FC; 4 1 %00 UNIT: TOTAL: $ . 2 7 6 0 , Alb)octto Change on January la King Caunly!MPRO cogently Charge: Currently, 0987.64/r by lOn9 County after connection to the !sewer eyatem, teub*e Wm) b. gnome a. Other: URL ULAE- DISTRICT Q Preliminary Piet or PUD 12 01 CI Rezone GI :y lie; Regglred I herepy certify that the above Bawer agency Intonation le true. Thl: from the date of el nature. 1'ille 4 425226922? 1411111 MOI�OW Racal say P.O. lox 681150 Tukwila, A 0811* Phony (11 8) 242411110 Fox: (ROO) $42.1527 ND.702 WI Q Certifi • = to of Sewer Non - Availability ler crow C7 Other approved cower comprehensive elve plan amendment, or hoe been granted 11cundary rict, dengal equivalent, will be billed directly to change by King ColMetra withal), certification ertell be yalld for one year x. Date D04 -421 • ATTACHMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY Kelp COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 125 The following terms and conditions apply to the attached Certificate of Availability ("Certificate "). 1. This Certificate of Water Availability is valid only for the real property referenced herein for the sole purpose of submission to the City of u(a "City "). This Certificate is issued at the request of the City, and not assignable or transferable to any other party. Further, no third person or party shall have any rights hereunder whether by agency or as a third party beneficiary or otherwise. 2. The District makes no representations, express or implied, that the applicant will be able to obtain the necessary permits, approvals, and authorizations from the City or any other applicable land use jurisdiction or governmental agency necessary before applicant can, utilize the utility service which is the subject of this Certificate. 3. As of the date of the issuance of this Certificate, the District has water available to provide utility service to the real property which is the subject of this Certificate, and the utility systems exist or may be extended by the applicant to provide service to such property. However, the issuance of this Certificate creates no contractual relationship between the District and the applicant or the City, and the issuance of this Certificate may not be relied upon and does not constitute the District's guarantee that water utility service will be available to the real property at the time the applicant may apply to the District for such service. 4. Application for and the possible provision of District utility service to the real property which is the subject of this certificate shall be subject to and conditioned upon the . availability of water service to the real property at the time of such application, as well as all federal, state, and District laws, ordinances, policies and regulations in effect at the time of such application for utility service, including conservation, water restrictions, and other policies and regulations then in effect. Applicant's Signature District Representative CAP Date Date z z w re 2 JU O 0 co en = w 0 u. Q = d • w z ZO LL! ku 0 O - O F- w w ..z w 0 z License Information License PITZEHI978Q4 Licensee Name PITZER HOMES INC Licensee Type CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR UBI 602313880 Ind. Ins. Account Id Business Type CORPORATION Address 1 46533 284TH AVE SE Address 2 City ENUMCLAW County KING State WA Zip 98022 Phone 2536329159 Status ACTIVE Specialty I GENERAL Specialty 2 UNUSED Effective Date 11/24/2003 Expiration Date 11/24/2007 Suspend Date Separation Date Parent Company Previous License PITZECC993R6 Next License Associated License Business Owner Information Name Role Effective Date Expiration Date PITZER, JAMES M PRESIDENT 11/24/2003 Look Up a Contractor, Electrir„l,an or Plumber License Detail ,� Page 1 of 2 Washington State Department of Labor and Industries General /Specialty Contractor A business registered as a construction contractor with L &I to perform construction work within the scope of its specialty. A General or Specialty construction Contractor must maintain a surety bond or assignment of account and carry general liability insurance. Bond Information Bond #2 Bond Company Name DEVELOPERS SURETY & INDEM CO Bond Account Number 544074C Effective Date 11/05/2004 Expiration Date Until Cancelled Cancel Date Impaired Date Bond Amount $12,000.00 Received Date 10/20/2004 CUMBERLAND https: // fortress. wa. gov /lni/bbip /printer.aspx ?License= PITZEHI978Q4 01/11/2006 • • i ... -• .. ......_ • i PR OP O Q r:.. ;! I • .•....:.•' DRIVEWAY' p . :... • • t i : ; . • . ' . • . . . � l /... .... ... ....... \(5:• , Yj . norm _vliiirp.rgE-aimur...1,-* GARAGE THRESHOLD =99.0 ; . r PROPOSED; GARAGE 1 Ir • 2" SCH 4 PVC FORCEMAIN. EXTEND TO MH F16-25 PER VAL ' i VUE SEWER DISTI SIDS. f-- ( E RINO R PUMP AND PRESSURE SIDE EWER — BIDDER ESIGN. /SHOWN HERE FOR GENERA REFERENCE S 150TH I I BUILDING AN FOUNDATION IP 1 AR PLANS' 40'! R/W 1 _ f l c • S l S I • • • • morromorrimaimiren 4111111► v I • • ( • ! BUILDING HEIGHT LIMIT EL= 99.5 BU'LDING CORNER EL= 95.0 E:; L DIN CORNER EL= 99.0 E::,LDING CORNER EL= 90.0 CORNER • EL= 94.0 r',RASE GRADE PLANE 33.0 r'E EL=7.74.3 • r 1 f I 1 1 f OF Y2 RIDGE HEICi -IT ALLOWED } R: GE I-?E GH T PROPOSED r DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION NOT TO SCALE PROKSED �/' 1G 1 ; / I / c Ire � ��'� .. J t e` � ` r.x. / , .. t ..� /� / i - I ) n . ' .1r.�.. PROPOSED? i DECK c . 1 / 0111111i11 ANN& i FE— , I 90.5 WA TER SERVICE PER WD #125 STANDARDS, 7 r CO'JFIRM SIZE / ;', : • i t I UNDERGROUND DRY UTILITIES( -------1 - / l -- f IELD C00RDINA E LOCATION w/ PROVIDERS ------- .. .._....__ _...._.t. / • • • mew N.M. 41110 -,— ROCKERY =3' r M AX± I CAST IN LACE I,-- CURB AND RAILING „ ,.. - "*1 AS REQ. CB 1 TYPE 1 1 '41' 1 RIM =98.7 ; E=95. (6 ° ) GRINDER PUMP CHAMBER � 1 J 1 1 I • r 4" 10OWNSPOUT. COLLECTOR r 2" GRADE BOARD ---- NOTChES , • / 41 FOOTING GRAIN // i i 1 I 18 3 t I a ... s "E" PVC STORM ()RAIN I 1 2%, MIN 4" PVC fOQ11JG DRAIN DISCHARGE/ 'TYPE i Ca eq YARD DR AIN i i •V w I I r • • • • PROVIDE 2OLF DOWNSPOUT; DISPERSAL TRENCH / • ./ i • ► ��.✓ Ti-i'S 'RENO+ SHALL BC CONSTRUCTED SC AS TO PRE :._ti- FaN' DISCHARGE. AND/OR EROS:ON 2.T ;EN':HES MAY SE PLACED NO CLOSER y`: 50 TO C\E ANOT •ER. (1 CO' .ALONG TRENCH AND GRADE BOARD MUST 9E LE'•EL. AL'GN T3 r CLL O' CONTOURS OF SE. ..SUPPC,R T POST S=-AC tiS B' S 'L CONDO PCVS TO ENSURE GRACE BOARD REM A'NS LE r PLAN VIEW OF ROOF DOWNSPOUT DISPERSION TRENCH NOT TO SCALE • • S S ► A `,JA.'4'C '24 SPE ri S?ON TRENCH W/ NC C GR BOARD LENGTH 10' P£R ►0%" G SC: FT OF AIPERMOUS SLcpE ARE. A. SEE FIGURE 4.2.2.0 OF THE ---- - / SRS ICE V TER DE51GN MA? J AL I r / • 20 " notca1 ora::."? board ;.osrfies 18' O.C. / �l 30 • rainuot it no-4 areas • tITILITt • 0 \ r: • • • • I— c • • • 1 W • • • • A 50' t • # ,7 _ 4 • C P • 1 • c• 161 N. rilarc have been reviewed • 1,,--.i,ciort% which do DM 2UthOrbe Tiention% of fer - he adequacy of the amigo rects wins the dr eta this date :a void thiS accectrice .17: Will main a testitimittal ci drawings =mince is seiect to field Wertheim by CI 1. ince 10 The of 7;c17 teta:ly With the of Nvise.. MEOW • \ DV, 6 2t55 otTekVi 100 1 -------- CAUTION! upiecpatouNo myna DasT w. 7 1 STATE LAIN REQUIRES THAT CONTRA I 48 040tireS WOK STAMM ANY _ 1...,— 1-800-424-5:1 ...........—,—._,......— %, PrIE c opy flOCIIMIED • AT AST Conti 145 SW 135o Phone Fax (mi cr. 5 0 R I LT1'8 z w , w , . __I I E z ti :D I i cc L a 1 1-- 0 .....; , 0 . ...... ---- 1 Lo (..5 I- < v-- z = 1 ..i i co - 52 CC 1111■1•11111111.1111111.1111.611111■411111•111011V NW, Wa S 150TH STREET I I I Nmilimg% r% Volwolinarti I E!? GE. or T rD UND TACK & SHIN\R I BBS (17663) i I SP4STAL- C;;;RT F DTCH is PRESEN pr R ROAD STAND ARDS CRONES / I I I fOUND REBAR & (29537) ( REFER S 0.4.4.1 CF THE KING mom slatow FOR AODIT 6 0 4 4AL iNFORM A r<,N I 4111111111111.1111111111111111111111111181111•Mmt N 0 N ds FOUNsfACK & SHINER VIORES‘(29537) w ( CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE I. • I / a if: / 7' 1-0 1h CONSTRUCTION ETRANCE, ZIEE DETAIL ), THIS SHEET 0) 16" SIGNIFICAN) TREE TO BE RgIAOVED / 12" SIPNWICANT TREE 7 0 OE REMOVED ,1 1 I 1 / . ,..... ' / / .-- / e „,.. / , / —0--,- . . - - /..-.•;-, .1- / f..., .... 4. „- ,,: --'I e: i 1.-.-' ''--\/t.if, / .-' \.) I 11111.Z.4 t, 11 (rs 171 4. • &NV '‘4 4 ir !s Tt.4E L' ;nib' - -44 .41P 1Pr 4b .,111P ENTRANCE : CROANEO SC THAT IRUN/OFF DR A NS OFF THE PAD 44b der7 4'4 •.pb a - 1 111111111111& t I I I I F I f 0) I 5/ i” Z PRCVIOE FULL WIDTH OF IN1GRESS/ECRESS AREA t PER KIN; CC. R3A0 STANDAR'...S, DRIVEWAYS SHP-L E PA.:S.D TO THE EDGE OF R/W PRIZA 70 NSTAWNG CONSTRUCTION EN•7:i INCE TO AVOD DAMAGING PAVEMENT EDGE. CROWN EN TR AN CE TO DR AN. , 1E." . () , - OFIE S8 08'33"E • 5' CLEARING LIMITS /-/ / A / / • SI / F1LTER/F/ABRIC FENCE, c !, SEE ,DE TAIL 2 / z . / MIRAFI 14ONS OR ED. FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL (60' WiDE ROLLS) OVER 2x2N14 GA ME MESH. USE STAPLES OR RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC n TO WIRE -U.- — 11 LURY BOTTOM OF FILTER 1 1 -II FABRIC IN 8rx12 TRENCH 1 1 A 6' MAX- I 11 2x4 STANDARD STANDARD OR BTR - (NARROW SIDE TO 7-T. II U OR STEEL FENk.. POSTS ELEVATION • 20" 0 I I „.e I mimmaimmas ; Mms•■■•= .....:m1....1111111M '5 \ 30' 1 skcenoN FILTER FABRIC FENCE NOT TO SCALE I lIE tr• glt UTILITY P1.111 \ 5' ...-1 • eA. \ \ BSBL I • mosioneinstaraamitrommearamismosessamsaasinimaradoomasexmlbranassugamarossatromor arearsoriassosmoss WETLAND EDGE TYPE 3 • • • • 50' „ BUFF:R C 252.6 1 14 . \252.62' \ • TESC NOTES 14" 0 Olt ,,/ 16" , • . LN..l 1 1. THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (ESC) MEASURES ON THE APPROVED PLANS ARE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. 2. BEFORE BEGINNING ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, ESTABUSH THE CLEARING WATS, INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE, AND INSTAU. EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES. 3. BEFORE ANY GROUND DISTU9ACE OCCURS, AU. DOWNSTREAM EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES (ESC) MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND IN OPERATION INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL. ESC MEASURES ACCORDING TO THE ESC PLAN. 4. ESC MEASURES, INMUDNG ALL PERIMETER CONTROLS, SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL SITE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED AND PERMANENT STABIUZAllON IS ESTA BUSHED. 5. FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEP TEmSER 30, PROVIDE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT COVER MEASURES TO PROTECT DISTURBED AREAS THAT VIILL REMAIN UNWORKED FOR SEVEN DAYS OR MORE. /.. C. / t ( L-' r. DUNCANSON Company, Inc. 115 SW 155th Street, Suite 102 Seattle, Washington 98166 Phone 206.244.4141 Fax 206.244.4455 •11.M■MEME•Mbm....• 01.3 DRAWN: EJM DC1 NO: 05505 DATE: 9/20/05 3 OF 3 SHEETS I i _ GRAPHIC S i ( FEET ) 1 Web 10 1 #000"sinm DEC 162005 n it t innl‘rtcfnm . - . t 1`41 CAUTION' UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES COST IN umurr wroatualori 91011I4 PAY e rdcomPurE. STATE LAW RECUIRES THAT CONTR.; TOR co W .CT THE 4,4E-CA5L UTILIFTY LOCATE SE EICE AT LE.:ST 441 HOURS SUCRE STAMM ANY ;Xng= 1-800-424-5- Ib . 7/ 2 . • . V t.K 1 IL.I Lr LJ 1 L jVl I kJ K IIV I It. FE VIAL. OHE FOUND TACK & HINER DOBBS (17663) \, C S I 50TH STRE(T I 1 l ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE ON AN ASSUMED DATUM 2 0' CONTOUR INTERVAL - THE EXPECTED VERTICAL ACCURACY IS EQUAL TO 1/2 THE CONTOUR INTERVAL OR PLUS / MINUS 1.0' FOR THIS PROJECT. I I I t EDGE OF ASPHALT l f t f i 1 FOLIO REBAR & CAP r te/ CRONES (29537) N gt • FOUND TACK & SHINER CRONES (29537) i ONE U 30" i r i i 16" I LJH 'Jr utHKII' _.... ∎WV / /// �.. //� c� g ot � a • • • • • • " % / / /// / / //m / / . �N...∎∎\ ■∎. ■∎... ∎—• RECORD OF SURVEY BY DOBBS, FOC & ASSOCIATES AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9310089007, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. ACCEPTED A BEARING OF S88 °08'53 "W FOR S 150TH STREET BASED ON FOUND MONUMENTS LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 8, BLOCK 4 OF ADAM'S HOME TRACTS SECOND ADDITION, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS ON PAGE 90, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 125 FEET THEREOF TOGETHER WITH VACATED PORTION OF SOUTH 150TH STREET ADJOINING TO SAID PREMISES BY ORDINANCE NUMBER 8851 UTILITY POLE 1 i l 1 1 1 1 ONE W S88 ° 08'33 "E 7/ / / 77- / 1 r 1 i • N88 °Or29"W L..GV WETLAND F-LAGGIM a ( ONE C INDEX CONTOURS - 10' INTERVALS INTERMEDIATE CONTOURS - 2' INTERVALS CONIFEROUS TREE (LABELED WITH CALIPER) DECIDUOUS TREE (LABELED WITH CALIPER) DECIDUOUS MULTI -TRUNK TREE (LABELED WITH CALIPERS) OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINES SANITARY SEWER LINES (PER AS -BUILT INFO) WATER LINES (PER AS -BUILT INFO) STORM SEWER LINES (PER AS -BUILT INFO) OHE s. A Zc • [ \ / it s • • • • ✓ 0 18, • O 18" *-r l r+ 'Ur c ' • 252.64: J (;` 0 • 1 THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT. EASEMENTS AND OTHER ENCUMBEPANCES MAY EXIST ON THIS PROPERTY THAT ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON. 2. INSTRUMENTATION FOR THIS SURVEY WAS A 5-SECOND NIKON NPL 352 TOTAL STATION. PROCEDURES USED IN THIS SURVEY MEET OR EXCEED STANDARDS SET BY WAC 332-130-090. 3. THE INFORMATION ON THIS MAP REPRESENTS THE RESULTS OF A SURVEY MADE IN NOVEMBER2004 AND CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED AS INDICATING THE GENERAL CONDMONS EXISTING AT THAT TIME. 4. UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY ARE BASED UPON ABOVE GROUND OBSERVATIONS AND AS-BUILT PLANS WHERE AVAILABLE ACTUAL LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTIUTIES MAY VARY AND UTILITIES NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY MAY EXIST ON THIS SITE. 5. ALL MONUMENTS WERE LOCATED DURING THIS SURVEY UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 1 o Q 1r fr r ff / / pouto mom: CAP' N NICENOID 1E 0 1 13 Z UM W :5 4 .<1.1<1 4 - 41 0 tJJ 2004-426 1 FILE mix. 2004-42641 .DGN DESIGNWORAWIt T.WOLDENDORP SHEET MIN cop OD N- CO CT CO Ch co r 2" SCH 4p PVC FORCEMAIN. EXTEND TO MH F16-25 PER VAL VUE SEWER DIST' SIDS. 1 GRINDER PUMP AND PRESSURE SIDE EWER -- BIDDER ESIGN. iSHOWN HERE FOR GENERA REFERENCE I '! 1 - IDUILDING AN FOUNDATION ATIOF ARt H PLAN tl I S 150TH r f I ) i 1 40' R/W STREET "sle 111111810 ire 1 4 t C,:�l I 4•=. • • 3 A J 4 :..R:;c ~ED ri0c< 40 I 1 i EL= 99.5 BULDNG CORNER EL= 93.0 Bw:_C;Itr:; CORNER EL= 99.0 BU+LCING CORNER E,_ 90.0 6 r. �_ 61.3; CORNER EL= 94.0 AVER ACE GRADE PLANE 3. V r 5 / r� If I NOT TO SCALE I r • / BUILDING HEIGHT L R HE "• T P ' 01N�� A„ � . 2 R'.. 3_ HE ;;HT PR CS=D I PROP( SED ( ' BUILDI'!G I COUPACT D sues:R.:0)E DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION 30 y J 5,4 L FF- =IQ0.5 I ,..1 Nis • "1 • • • WA i ER SERVICE PER WC #125 STANDARDS, .CC SIZE ,f;' • ' CAST IN PLACE Imo-- CURB AND RAILING AS RED'( 23 ff 1 1 31' IE =95.7 (S") l I, GRINDER PUMP '1' CHAMBER I / • • / S PROPOSED ,/ DECK ...I....P. ••••11111.••••.. \ ...... 1 1 1 1 'A t. t . , t j Y ROCKERY H M. ax± UNDERGROUND DRY UTILITIES! HELD COORDINATE LOCATION W/ PROVIDERS - 1 ----.._...._ I 4" DOWNSPOUT: COLLECTOR / I FOOTING GRAIN I 2" GRADE NOTCh . 2q� • I' /4" PVC FOQ''1NG DISCHARGE// 1 8" I j E PVC STORM DRAIN 0 2% MIN ... (L j / l TYPE I C5 O R I YARD OR 4 S f PRO 201f DOWNSPOUT{ DISPERSAL TRENCH • .` NOT TO SCALE DRAIN 1 t EY TO ENSURE GRAZ :! %S `C 1 1 • • • • • i • • • EE LE A: 'Gs TO • +. THIS TR`NC. - SHALL CONS:RUCTED S3 AS TO PR T S 0 E'' F O'N? DISCHARGE AND ICR ER'CJS 2 -Tr ENCHES UAY EE PLACED NC CLCS`K 5.3' TO CNE V AL ONiC 1 TR= N A'`.: GRADE : 0A-RD v:. FOLLCA CCV TOURS Or Si 4 .SUP?ORT POST c.,AC.N i AS CONDi 1 CN S • 1 S -AND -D D: S ER DCN TRENCH w/ c--; A E BEARD LENGTH 10' DER : ; :c SC FT OF i aPERVIOUS AREA. `_E = :; RE 4.2.2 -C OF THE ACE * £ TER DESK:7• MANUAL PLAN VIEW OF ROOF DOWNSPOUT DISPERS!ON TRENCH ' ' '' !.J • 1 notched t ra,: ? beard ` r • I troarriot in no* area& Igo • • • i ppe 0.D. ; ,11. min Emir S SECTC"L ..1k4 0 • ,/ • type I CE ccver A I t ,IIMMINIIMMIMIIMP.I N , 7 c . I: wire tan end cap or p:ug • 50' • • • ,/ • / ,/ • • r. cT • et / / , / 5RAPHIC SCALE .) / ■ IN/FEET ) nr which do not solhorime riofrifmc of :0- "le a4equacy of the &lip mos tn1311/ with the erl after tin% date will void this aCtcp.7"ICC iccer0290e is sehee to field Wreak* by • • • • ------reijilieDi\ -.---C-(1----1"CgTuieflia \ MC 161.C;25 WOW. nigICIn" CAUTION taurf riFoRmAnoN 94am ik•AY u sTATE LAW REQUIRES THAT CONTRA 1 48 HOURS BEFORE STARTING ANY ,. 1-- 1-1300-424--5:- \ dill.....1.1.1.111111.11/11.1111.1.1111.11111'* 4111111101■ — 08111,11/11/ANIMISSIel - 10 cOSIF AT IAST F ... 145SW 1550 Phone Fax raZ Cf) i 0 5: :^ (f) c.) I , ,..._P Z — tn < °-- I i cc L 2 d 1 ..... ---1 I 1-- co 6 N < ce) irr , , o 1 ....,_ ., ..--- z --, 'W 0 , I L .----j------...... 1 1 7-1-40 Cl • DRAWN: E,AMI I a DATE: 9 /20/05 ap mom 1.s-.r 1 of 3Sims NOIl d INOS30 EVISI aiva _ 70t . I , DRAWN: E,AMI Dcl NO: 05506 DATE: 9 /20/05 ap mom 1.s-.r 1 of 3Sims 16 ft GENERAL NOTES: 1. LOCATIONS SHOWN FOR EXISTING UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. 2. AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE STARTING PROJECT SITE WORK, NOTIFY THE UTILITIES INSPECTOR AT 206- 433 -0179. 3. REQUEST A PUBLIC WORKS UTILITY INSPECTION AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE BY CALLING 206- 433 -0179. 4. THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMES SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR WORKER SAFETY, AND DAMAGE TO STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE PERMIT(S) AND CONDITIONS, THE APPROVED PLANS, AND A CURRENT COPY OF CITY OF TUKWILA DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE. 6. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THESE APPROVED DRAWINGS. ANY CHANGES FROM THE APPROVED PLANS REQUIRE PRE — APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER, THE ENGINEER, AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA. 7. ALL METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL MEET CITY OF TUKWILA DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES AND DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, UNLESS OTHENNISE APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A CURRENT SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS ON —SITE. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RECORD DRAWINGS PRIOR TO PROJECT FINAL APPROVAL. 10. PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL AND STREET MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PUBUC WORKS APPROVAL BEFORE IMPLEMENTATION. 11. ALL SURVEYING FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES SHALL BE DONE UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A WASHINGTON LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR. VERTICAL DATUM SHALL BE NAVD 1988. HORIZONTAL DATUM SHALL BE NAD 83/91. FOR PROJECTS WITHIN A FLOOD CONTROL ZONE, THE PERMITTEE SHALL PROVIDE CONVERSION CALCULATIONS TO NGVD 1929. 12. REPLACE OR RELOCATE ALL SIGNS DAMAGED OR REMOVED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. 13. RETAIN, REPLACE OR RESTORE EXISTING VEGETATION IN RIGHTS —OF —WAY, EASEMENTS, AND ACCESS TRACTS. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER SURVEY FROM GEODATUM, INC. LOT 8, BLOCK 4 OF ADAM'S HOME TRACTS SECOND ADDITION, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS ON PAGE 90, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 125 FEET THEREOF TOGETHER WITH VACATED PORTION OF SOUTH 150TH STREET ADJOINING TO SAID PREMISES BY ORDINANCE NUMBER 8851 SURVEY NOTES: SURVEY PERFORMED BY GEODATUM, INC. PROJECT# 2004 -470 DRAWING# 2004 - 470— S1.DGN. NOTES LISTED BELOW ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE ORIGINAL SURVEY. 1. THIS SURVEY WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF A CURRENT TITLE REPORT. EASEMENTS AND OTHER ENCUMBERANCES MAY EXIST ON THIS PROPERTY THAT ARE NOT SHOWN HEREON. 2. INSTRUMENTATION FOR THIS SURVEY WAS A 5— SECOND NIKON NPL 352 TOTAL STATION. PROCEDURES USED IN THIS SURVEY MEET OR EXCEED STANDARDS SET BY WAC 332 -130 -090. 3. THE INFORMATION ON THIS MAP REPRESENTS THE RESULTS OF A SURVEY MADE IN NOVEMBER2004 AND CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED AS INDICATING THE GENERAL CONDITIONS EXISTING AT THAT TIME. 4. UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY ARE BASED UPON ABOVE GROUND OBSERVATIONS AND AS —BUILT PLANS WHERE AVAILABLE. ACTUAL LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MAY VARY AND UTILITIES NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY MAY EXIST ON THIS SITE. 5. ALL MONUMENTS WERE LOCATED DURING THIS SURVEY UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONTACT INFORMATION OWNER SURVEYOR CIVIL ENGINEER UTILITY INFORMATION WATER SERVICE WD#125 SEWER SERVICE VAL —WE FIRE SERVICE KING COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #2 15100 8th AVENUE SW BURIEN, WA 98166 (206) 242 -2040 TELEPHONE: ()WEST POWER: PUGET SOUND ENERGY 1- 800 -321 -4123 EARTHWORK ESTIMATES CUT FILL 10 CY (STRIPPING) = 95 CY (STUCTURAL) SINGLE FAMILY SITE IMPROVEMENTS PITZER HOMES, INC REPRESENTATIVE: JOHN TAMBUREW DAMS REAL ESTATE GROUP 1201 MONSTER ROAD SW, SUITE 230 RENTON, WA 98055 (206) 920 -2220 GEODATUM INC. 22525 SE 64th Place, Suite 266 ISSAQUAH, WA 98027 (425) 837 -8083 DUNCANSON COMPANY INC 145 SW 155TH STREET SUITE 102 BURIEN, WA 98166 206- 244 -4141 F VISIONS C: r yf VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SHEET INDEX C1.1 COVER, VICINITY MAP AND NOTES C1.2 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN C1.3 TESC AND CLEARING UMITS Fault Ns. Nam Isom 1Iu _& :Tt al Al Alma conetnetIon downy* emlimilm The *Non at dies nit adorn accepted code or adleenoa MIRO et appowed Reid Cpl/ and ca)!Ildans le admiralties.* 11111110111% CIVISICIII d ,4 - 2 - w 1 14 Fir ' \-- w+ �7 Of T.: 1 BUILDING or sION REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE NCE 000 nun) DEC 1 5 Z005 Of Tukwila Fit WTNf: nT11tSICIN PECErvED Cr OF 7- ,,XMLA PERMIT C. 1- 80o-424 -5556 v 4 13 CAUTION TRIOERGROUND UTILITIES EXIST PI THE AREA AND UThJTY INFORISATION 9401114 MAY 8E STATE LAIr REQUIRES WHAT CONTRACTOR Clt1TACT THE O E —CM.L UTILITY LOCALE SE'R'VICE AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE STARING ANY cosSinuClION x VldIIIVu.VERNirao.dog - .rte• �•.�• • • • DUNCANSON Company, Inc. 14$ SW 155th Street, Suite 102 Stunk, Washington 98166 Phone 206.244.4141 Fax 2066 244.4455 TUKWILA/GUILLERMO PFIZER HOMES, INC. I REVISIONS - 1 I A8 - , NO U d I J3S3a I 31•0 'ON • d•-•■■11111■•••••••••," • - - _ S 150TH \ 2" SCH 46 PVC FORCEMAIN. EXTEND TO MH F16-25 PER VAL VUE SEWER DISTI SIDS. GRINDER PUMP AND PRESSURE SIDE HERE FOR GENERA REFERENCE SEWER - BIDDER rSIGN. 'SHOWN I I 0 1 I I I .1 40 R /W STREET i I 1 r 2" CLASS B ACP MIS i i CRUSHED ROCK -c' r c • ASPH.a.L. I - • i PROPOtiO I ASP. 'ALT L,Le...4'.' . . D I # WA1 . . ,.. / . / 4 ......... ' ,'• " / ' • • 2 '' I, BUILDING AN9 FOUNDATION 1PER ARPH PLAN .. ........ p I I r / NOT TO SCALE BUILDING HEIGHT LIMIT EL= 99.5 BUILDING CORNER EL= 98.0 BUILDING CORNER EL= 89.0 BUILDING CORNER EL= 90.0 BUILDING CORNER EL= 94.0 AVERAGE GRADE PLANE 30.0 HEIGHT LIMIT EL=124.0 MAX OF RIDGE HEIGHT ALLOWED EL=123.0 ACTUAL )1i Rioc HEIGHT PROPOSED 4 1 • • Otir GARAGE THRESHpLo EL= V.0 PROPOSEDL,,,, / GARAGE COMPACTED SUBGRADE DRIVEWAY CROSS SECTION '.0 PROP SED 4.7 / ..---' / . ,.. ,/ z-, / (,/----/ - --. / s\ ,/ I ,/ / v ,,- ./' ..',' / / ' - r ./ / / '' / ---- ,,, ./c .,- '1 (-. PI/ , .„-- N e ./ / • WATER SERVICE PER WD #125 STANDARDS, CONFIRM SIZE / i UTILL1Y POLE , .-/ -.ce i , ( ....1..._„„, - I UNDEOGROUND DRY UTILITIES; /I _. i .J COORDINATE LOCATION / Wi PRO \AD ERS - - - - *— -- --/---- _.! I eMINimr. I ...;1•Mil=i11111111ft t zoieroje N d r eirek..... fr • o e O • 4 li r MA • 111.. 111.. 0....wa -CB _Oa Abay.46,0 11.. .. - FF=190.5 /-# i i ROCKERY -I=3' MAX± CAST IN PLACE CURB ANt) RAILING k AS REQ' CB 1 TYPE 1 RIM=9§.7 IE=95., (6") GRINDER PUMP CHAMBER I ,MNINII 1/01111 I I 2" GRADE BOARD NOTCHES 1 4" 0OWNSPOUT: COLLECTOR I 4/ FOOTING DRAIN 1 co a.) k, PROPOSED / DECK / I ,-7 -------- / - -,, / ; I ' : 41• (41 \ sc ! ./- \ „ , ..z, ? 1 i ;.' - k=,. -7 i 4 ....... i 1 , •■•••••■ NOM .111111a1M 11.1■11111MMNINII•11111•111■40.......... 6" PVC STORM DRAIN 0 MIN /8- /4" PVC FOVTING DRAIN / DISCHARGE/ 7 1 'p. 1 TYPE I C8 OR YARD DRAIN / I I PROVIDE 2OLF DOWNSPOUT, DISPERSAL TRENCH I I I. I I PLAN VIEW OF ROOF • I NOTES: 1. THIS TRENCH SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED SO AS TO PREVENT POINT DISCHARGE AND/OR EROSION 7-TRENCHES MAY BE PLACED NO CLOSER THAN 50' TO ONE ANOTHER. (100' ALONG FLOWLINE) 3.TRENCH AND GRADE BOARD MUST BE LEVEL AIJGN TO FOLLOW CONTOURS OF SI TE. 4.SUPPORT POST SP AONG AS REQUIRED BY SOIL CONDITIONS TO ENSURE GRADE BOARD REMAINS LEVEL. r / / DOWNSPOUT DISPERSION WENCH NOT TO SCALE II • STANDARD DISPERSION TRENCH W/ NOTCHED GRADE BOARD LENGTH 10' PER 1000 SQ FT OF IMPERVIOUS SL AREA., SEE FIGURE 4.2.2.0 OF THE SURF WATER DESIGN MANUAL \ S. • 5 S. I noiched grade board _ r nosches 1111' 0.C. 2' Xi POSSIMI Iraesed wade bawd O.* 4" support pad *c 1 z / r / 1./ 1) / 24' /- ) . ./92'\,, / r i / .r / ‘( ) / / 9\ • 14- - 30" (") pipe Oa r -o !Ar t - yen 'Mir: end ceP cx pig • clean out aye fran pipe h. • a PLAN NTS - 1514 mot far lbw callialltealar Warr Ovalliant iri swag am& I. ) ii....5 17 I 'S"' 7 1/ 7 C—V\ .4•••• •••••„../ S. , I ; . a a 4" or 6' pedoraled pipe laid flat/leve I a v. SECTXI AA NTS 24b / / / / j ....3\...`;'‘ t--; /` / / -'; --\, — / c ...0 k ,\/....,... 4..; 3 / 18 / ., •••-■•■,11 LJT!LIT1' S. Carr peolanded pipe lad %it ./ / , • type I C.:13 wisoki cover nockingl A A ineuent poe (max design fla s CFS per trench) clean ow wive tarn PiPe dna S% inn) 1W "messed midt "." 4/1 4.C) r / 0 18' --- . L > S. . , *) t .,....s" \- , -- i / z r / ,c11; Z WETLAND EDGE TYPE 3 ,/ / 1 4' BSBL • • ■,-- I Z _..,.•■•'''''- f......• ••,..• (s.' ....r r. r-• L...r e 'sv - ----' \ 7 _,,- (74 50' BUFF,X 7 ,---- .-_. rr V 0.0.10• <"' ••■■■ ,„ r 1(9;" / / I 1 I I I • ---....... •■•■=aa• .,111/6711•01•11•••■•• •■■•■111. 7-7 )3 1.,.. 1 8" / /' I 18" 7 / 18" ) /' 20 III i-a 4 0 el g". ( min= ) 1 'w it 10 ft./ (I I ) 111P, 1111,” P211 IP! MI 1111111111111 Ar: 4747 ior • • C • ■-• Pe) acter r..ct iTez-::en 1 :7 m vit\tv cid CODE CONTLANCE 10,043mr=1) 1 5 ;;,5 City Of TukwIla •Ur. CAUTION! III_r4r: r)TVISInN T r:arts have 1-teer rry;c-we4 ?l•r r Work Department fir coi -1 City stndards. Aczerance vl•ict c--% 74- omissions which do no ralherin tr.c ,1' 2d•or ed standards or ordinarmc. 'inc for the adequacy of the &Kiri re* tr. , r4! desiper. Adcaioos, cieieimrs or Ter"-'-' o , hett erzs eer this dire ' rid rri% wil r-suiar a res-2. of rr:v.ed dr fPr smyrrirsL REOEIVED crry oF - Liviamuk C .46%. • PERMIT CENTER UNDERGROUND LITILITES ET IN 11HE AREA AND LITIUTY INFORMATION SHOWS MY BE INCOPIETE. STATE LAW RECIUIRES 1NAT CCIPORACTOR CCINTACT DIE ONE-CALL UTIUTY LOCATE SER� AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE START; NItY coesiuolok. 11300-424-5555 VIIIIII‘drig\416011111111004., •••••- ••■• "pg., • - *arr.- • • rim •■•••...• •••■••■••• "N. . - _ gib DUNCANSON Company, inc. 145 SW 155th Street Suite 102 Seattle, Washington 98166 Phone 206.244.4141 Far 206.244.4455 -01•11..11P-••■• - •■■•■ +••••■■••••-• ■■••■•.111.. TUKWILA/GUILLERMO DRAWN: ELI Dcl NO: 05506 DATE: 9/20 /05 r 1111. P-3-4111 C1.3 3 OF 3 SHEETS le I I i r I S 150TH '1, STREET 1 I 40•1111/1/MMWIft. ..-.- j INSTALL CULVERT F DITCH IS PRESENT PER ROAD STANDARDS r / i f / I I f I f f -- AP I CRONES (29537) r I REFER TO SECTION D. 4.41 OF THE KING COUNTY SWUM FOR AOO110NA1 INFORMATION J Si I i f I I IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE ENTRANCE BE CROWNED SO THAT RUNOFF DRAWS OFF THE PAD f i t I I I I ,-# FOUND',TACK & SHINER f CRONES'(29537) r r... • I C. IMMO Ilia■ ■■4010■7111. *)/ r 15'x25' CONSTRUCTION E TRANCE, SEE DETAIL V, THIS SHEE l I 1 'a ! :1, 1 16" SIGNIFICAN TREE c I I TO BERMOVED ) 12 SIGNIFICANT TREE / 70 BE REMOVED I ,..�� \fir t/ �J~ r / i "7 / ` r r NOT TO SCALE i i I r I 30" \ f U111 i, ;'; PO; !.. I f 1 _....... 1 I 1 f MEM 1 r r ove • • 1 i 1 PER KING CO. ROAD STANDARDS. DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE PAVED TO THE EDGE OF R/W PRIOR TO INSTALLING CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO AVOID DAMAONG PAVEMENT EDGE_ CROWN ENTRANCE TO DRAM. PROMO( FULL MTh OF IIf71E4/EOESS AREA CONSTRUC11ON ENTRAN� I ----f I 1 s• 16 0 j � t i i • • • • • • 1 1 r I / 1 1 1 / / • • • • • • • 1 588 - 08'33" E 1 /(- CLEARING LIMITS ■.,(/ i • • • • / Si / I • 2. r / FILTER FABRIC FENCE, / SEE ,DETAIL 2 / • s 11111..••■ N88,07'29 "VIA\ _% 0 'r\ I '., .... I / PROMO( 34' — 1S• WASTED GRAVEL BACKFILL W4 TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES or FILTER FABRIC FENCE ON THE SUWAC _ 8 IIIRAFI 14ONS OR EQ. FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL (60' WIDE ROLLS) OVER 2 "x2 "x14 GA MARE MESH. USE STAPLES OR RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC WIRE I L BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER I FABRIC IN 8 "x12 TRENCH 6' MAX_ 2"x4' STANDARD OR BTR U (NARROW SIDE TO FENCE) OR STEEL FENCE POSTS ELEVATION SECTION \� 20" ...�� \ 30: 1 0 • NOT TO SCALE I • • 11 II II I I U ALTER FABRIC FENCE r / \ 24 " 0 1 UTIL . ,r Cp/ i i 1 . iC • • • WETLAND EDGE TYPE 3 • • z/ 50' BU 252._ r' TESC NOTES g3L ,7' • • • z' W 1. THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (ESC) MEASURES ON THE APPROVED PLANS ARE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. t. I t, 2. BEFORE BEGINNING ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, ESTABUSH THE CLEARING WAITS, INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCI, AND INSTALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURE& 3. BEFORE ANY GROUND DISTURBANCE OCCURS. ALL DOVINSTREAM EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES (ESC) MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND Pi OPERATION INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ALL ESC MEASURES ACCORDING TO 114E ESC PLAN. 4. ESC MEASURES, INCLUDING ALL PERIMETER CONTROLS, SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL FINAL TE CONSTRUCTION IS COUPLE TED AND PERMANENT STABIU ZATION IS 5. FROM MAY 1 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, PROVIDE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT COVER MEASURES TO PROTECT DISTUREIM AREAS THAT VOLL. RBIAIN UNWORKED FOR SEWN DAYS OR MORE_ • FOUND FtEBAR & CAP L \ S"' tit ...°)\ I • 3 • GRAPHIC SCALE I. Wick 10 bee poroigil CITY OF TuK PERMIT CENTE CAUTION! I UNDERGROUND UTILITIES MST IN ME AREA AND UTILITY INFORISATION 9110118. MAY BE 11.001MPLETE. STATE LA. REQUIRES THAT CONTRACTOR CONTACT THE ONE-CALL UTIUTY LOCATE SERVICE AT LEAST HOURS BEFORE STARRNG ANY CONSINUC1101‘. 1-800-424-5555 • • • th DUNCANSON Company, Inc. 145 SW 155th Street, Smite 102 Seattle, Wallsimgtom 98166 Phone 20(1.244.4141 Fax 206.244.4455 cc a. 51 0 0 ?b 0 ww pkes4e: f mE It K ' i P V x la r FINISH PER ELEVATION 0/ 15 LB. BEDS. PAPER OR AIR INFILTRATION BARRIER 0/ EATHIN6 PER PLAN z- FLASHI N6 MOOD TRIM OPTIONAL 2 (I) *4 BAR ito GOVT. TOP !1 III. -VIII Z X dJ . TI6HTLINE STORM DRAIN' IF REQUIRED l[1 = FRAMING AND FOUNDATION DIMENSION FINISH PER ELEVATION 0/ 15 LB. DLD6. PAPER OR AIR INFILTRATION BARRIER 0/ SHEATHING PER PLANS Z- FLASHINS MOOD TRIM OPTIONAL_ ■o 2' I I I PDN. DRAIN (1) *4 BAR CONT. TOP STORM DRAIN 1 IF REQUIRED g s; DRAIN METAL POST BASE P644 • 4X4 POST P846 • 4X6 POST (3) 04 BARS CONTINUOUS UOUS EACH WAY • ISOLATED FOOTINGS sa i��j 2): FLOOR ...1ST OR T.J.I.S PER PLANS T16HTLIAE -1 I I ,,, I I I- I 1 'II I g - flI..1I I I TYPICAL GARAGE FI7M. SI' FN. WALL 2X FLOOR JOISTS OR T,J.1.'5 PER PLANS i i LL 4 .4 2X6 STUDS • 16" O.G R -21 BATT. INSULATION R -90 BATT INSULATION S /4" T46 PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR 6LUED AND NAILED A e, d i e 31, i3,• ONESTORY , 8 . 4 4 • TY40 STORY SCALE 1' • I'-0' 9/4' T46 PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR EXT. 6LLED AND NAILED R-90 BATT. INSULATION MIN. a . !• • •O ' • • SEE DIME • ISOLATED FT6 S X-O' is 2X6 PRESSURE TREATED 4ILL PLATE YL/ 1/2' DIAMETER ANCHOR BOLTS AT 4' -0" O.G. . AND 12` MAX. FROM ENDS, OR Z PER SIEARW LL SCHEDULE; X 7' MIN. EMBEDMENT = 04 VERT. AT 16' O.G. zo 6 ML. BLACK VAPOR BARRIER ft:::HI: (2) M4 GONT. 130T. 2X4 STUDS AT I6 ` 04. 2X4 PRESSURE TREATED SILL PLATE W/ 1/2' DIAMETER ANCHOR BOLTS AT 4'-0' O.G. AND 12" MAX. FROM ENDS, OR PER SHEARWALL SCHEDULE; 1' MIN. EMBEDMENT 4' GONG. SLAB 0/ 6 MIL. VAPOR BARRIER 0/ 4' 6RAN ULAR FILL •4 111=111- H1F I' � f 1 I I VERT. • (2) *4 GONT. DOrroM NIENNIVNINNIN 2X WUP SEAM PER PLAN 4 METAL POST TO BEAM GOMEGTOR PG44 • 4X4 POST PG46 • 4X6 POST POST PER PLAN BUILDING PAPER 900 FELT 4 yE:NtAT 7_4 ISOLATED FOOTING SCALE a I' ■ I'-0' t 14:7T TO 90A4.E 7) RAFTER/GABLE END PTL. FRAMIN6 AND FOUNDATION DIMENSION FINISH PER ELEVATION 0/ iS LB. BLD6. PAPER OR AIR INFILTRATION BARRIER 0/ SNEAT'HIN6 PER PLAN PATERPIROOF MEMERAAE 4" GONG. SLAB STUB OUT *4 24 • 16" 0.G (I) *4 CONT. TOP 0 El Fjg *4 VERT. • 16' O.G. I1 ` 1 4' PERF. \ N 6 N FD DRAIN Ae5.1, (2) PORCH SLA5/FPN. 1 (I) *4 GOT. TOP 11 . . I •II- -II1E I i . : F' RAHM& AND FOLNDATION IDWENSION 2X TRIM BOARD 19N5 4 PER ELEVATION 0/ 6 I.B. OLDS_ PAPER OR AIR INFILTRATION DNdR! 0/ ATHIMS PER PLAN nATERPROOF 4' CONC. 5LAD T SIM OUT x4 I I � • ter OG. I' 1 1 A) 6 4 CONT. Tat -1 !I 44 VERT. • O.G. ► i Z• l ~ PIM L7RAN 9/4" T46 PLYY400D suerwon !! PER PLANS FL 4.. ... • 210 501E PLATE BASEBOARD TRIM 5/4' T46 PLYWOOD r OVERMANS PER PLANS : ; , • 4 I '4 a 4t 6. e:4? R -30 GATT. I NSUL.AT I ON 2X6 PRESSURE S�AATED SILL PLATE IL/ I/2" PA TER ANCHOR BOLTS AT 4' -0' O.G. AND 12" MAX. PROM ENDS, OR PER SHEARWALL SCHEDULE; 1' MIN. 013EDMENT 6 MIL. BLACK V.5. I1 I (2) *4 GONT. BOTTOM 2x6 P.T. SILL PLATE W/ I/2' PIAxIO' ANCHOR BOLTS PER SHEARY4ALL SCHEDULE (• 48'0.G. ELSEWHERE) 4 12' MAX FROM ENDS 1' MIN ETEIEDMENT 4 . •. 4 am. ono, mom • • A II III= 2X6 STUDS • 16" O.G. R -2I BATT. INSULATION (2) *4 GONE. BOTTOM STEFPE FOUNDATION SCALE ' 1 • • I'-O• *4 VERT. • 16'O.G. NOT TO SCALE 2X6 STUD WALL R-2I MIN BATT INSULATION 1/2' GDX PLYWOOD SH ATHENS SWIMS PER ELE1/ATiON5 5/6' 6YPSUM WALL BOARD DOUBLE 2Xb TOP PLATE 5/6' 6YP&UM1 Y4'4 BOARD SCALE. I' • I'-0' CANTILEVER DETAIL 2Xb Pow MALL • 16' 0G. 4 > ' zxe r+eeSdURE R -21 BATT. INSULATION PLATE Pv 1/2' TED SLUE I .ANCHOR DOLTS AT 4'-0"' 0.c. el Apip I2• moo( FROM ENDS, OR is PER SHEARPIAL.L. SCHEDLIM I -r Mk EMBEDIADIT i X • I'll. BLACK Y.5 111 C2) 11 CONT. ISOR'T'O4 5G#4Z.r•r • 8) PONY VLL/SLABIFPN Z I rOUNDATION NQTES WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS. ALL FOOTINGS TO HAVE A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 16" BELLOW FINISHED GRADE. 9. STEP FOUNDATIONS PER SITE CONDITIONS 4. ALL CONCRETE FOOTINGS TO REST ON FIRM UNDISTURBED EARTH WITH MINIMUM 2,000 PSP DEARIN6 PRESSURE (REFER TO SOILS REPORT WHEN REWIRED). 5. ALL WOOD IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE OR MASONRY OR EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHE=R TO BE PRESSURE TREATED. 6. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS AND FIELD CONDITIONS. • PROVIDE TEMPORARY BRACING AS REQUIRED. UNTIL ALL PERMANENT CONFECTIONS AND STIFFENING HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. D. PROVIDE DOUBLE LVL/JOIST OR BLOGKINS AT PARTITIONS ABOVE. PROVIDE I5'x1' FOUNDATION VENTS WITH 1/4• CORROSION RESISTANT WIRE MESH AS REQUIRED PER CODE. 10. U DENOTES DEARINb POINT IN 2X4 PONY WALL, PROVIDE MIN. (2) 2x4 STUDS • INDICATED POINT UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. II. CRAWL_ SPACE TO BE A MINIMUM OP IS" BELOW FLOOR JOIST AND 12" BELOW BEAMS OR 6IRDERS WITH MIN. 6 MIL BLACK VAPOR BARRIER 6ROUND COVER LAPPED 12' AT SEAMS AND EXTENDED UP FOUNDATION WALL_ TO SILL PLATE TYPICAL. 12. ALL BEAMS TO BE 4x10 *OF (SEE SIT I FOR LUMBER STRCN6TH VALUES). UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 15. ALL POSTS TO BE 4x4 (4x6 AT BEAM SPLICES) TYPICAL UNLESS NOTED cineRrase. TYP • ISOLATED BEAM RUNS. 14. ALL ISOLATED SPREAD FOOTI N6S TO BE 24'x24'x1O' THICK WITH (2) *4 BARS BOTTOM EACH WAY, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. IS. FOUNDATION ANCHOR BOLTS REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF 9'xS"xI /4' PLATE WASHERS. IRK R602.11.1 FOOTING SCHEDULE 24' DIAMETER X 10' TRICK CONCRETE FOOTING WITH (2) *4 BARS EACH WAY. EXT. 6L1ED AND !VEILED 90' DIAMETER X 12' THICK CONCRETE FOOT1N6 WITH (5)*4 BARS EACH HAY. 24'x8' THICK CONTINUOUS CONC. FOOT1N6 WITH (3) *4 BARS. 9/4' T46 PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR 2X SOLID t 2X !'LOOK JOISTS OR T.. 1.'S PER PLANS PHONY WALL 23•11, SUDS • Mr C.G. 2xb PR Ilk SILL YVI12" OVO ANCHOR MOLTS • 4'-0' 04. 6 Ma. ~OR -t 1=1 E 15)K saws , commas EAR WAY • ISOLA1w 1 • 1 r 2'-cr PONY WALL In 160• R -b0 BATT. SEE NOTE *4, TYP. 2'-O" 245( 46' xIO' THICK GONG. EACH WAY 1. -. .-U 1 mos MIN 9x SILL PLATE REVD PER SFEAR WALL SCHEINLE - SEE SHEET S -I (2) 2xI2 P.T. STRINGERS 2xI2 P.T. STRIN6E'.R, NAILED TO PONY WALL BELOW FLOOR JOISTS THRUST BLOCK SEE NOTE *4, TYP. 0 2) 2X6 TOP PLATE NOT TOE 2X P.T. LED6ER - 14/ S • SCREWS A. • 24" 0.G, TOP 4 BOTTOM STA66EREP TIM MI BULD*46 PAPER TO BE HICIRAPT IRATER!"'IROOF OR EQUAL Ei I l i r SEE ISOLATED rmik pot So" 4' 12' -O" 12'-4= 13'-4" ck 6 3/4" 40' -0" 40' -O' 2b' -O" PROVIDE MIN. 'x24' GRAY4 ACCESS 2 I/2' OFFSET rll 9'x96' HIGH MN,) PIPE BOLLARD ON ISRAI:;# 4' EON' = W1TH 6x6 010 KAK OVER c- MIL-NAB. OVER 4' GRAN. FIL aLOPE 4\10 O.H. DOORS 13'-6'X 5 4' CONCRETE SLM3 4 kELEV. +120' • 6ARA6E SLAB CRICKET, TYPICAL FOUNDATION VENT GALGS. 677 19O • 5.5 SF. PPI4. dfl4T .r. IOS / 144 x .'15 • 54'7 S.F. PER VENT. 5.5 S.F. / 541 • 10 MN. veins REGD. 20 a. 1/4' • Nn • • 11 000 ftn 3 y Of 'ru kwi:: P. 'T n:• - -z .srst» o OF PONT CENTER o11Vr1113116 A SA YE 11,4 4 RE Ilk MEM 4 • s m 11/2' 4 MIN. GOVT. HANDRAIL bit 10' MIN. NOTE' SPACING BETWEEN INTERMEDIATE 6UARDRAIL MEMBERS TO DE A MAXIMUM OP 4' GLEAM SUCH THAT A SPHERE OF 4' DIAMETER SHALL NOT PASS TH ROU6H ANY OPENING. M Th i BALUSTERS TO CONFORM TO 1RG SEC. R3JI "/ < 4 ` I I,1I, ,I.1 ■ A -54 FRAMING ANCHOR 2X4 'THRUST BLOCK I LAYER I/2' 61 BELOW STAIRS (5) 2X12 STRINGERS FIRE BLOCKING • MID -SPAN 4 • WALL ALONG STRIN6ER BETWEEN STUDS AND AT TOP AND BOTTOM OP STAIRS NP. INTERIOR STAIR NOT TO SCALE • t LOINER FLOQR FRAMIN6 NOT. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS 2. ALL HEADERS TO BE 4x10. D.F. *2 U.N.O., CHECK PLAN. 9. BOTTOM OF HEADERS TO BE 1'-6' THIS FLOOR U.N.O. 4. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS 2x6 WITH R -21 INSULATION UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5. ALL FRAME NAILING TO SATISFY CHAPTER 6 I.R.G. BLOCK ALL PLYWOOD ED6ES. ALL EXTERIOR SFEATHIN6 NAILED WITH IOd AT 6` O.G. (ED6E) AND I2' O.G. ('MELD), UN.O., TYP. 6. PROVIDE DOUBLE JOISTS OR BLOCKING WHERE PARTITIONS OCCUR ABOVE. 1. PROVIDE SOLID BLOGKIN6 OVER SUPPORTS. 6. PLATE HEI6HT TO BE •'-0' THIS FLOOR U.NA. 9. FIRE BLOCKING AT ALL PLUMBINS PENETRATIONS. 10. ALL STORA6E AND SPACES UNDER STAIRCASES TO BE FINISHED WITH 5/8' TYPE 'X' 6YPSUM BOARD. II. • DENOTES SOLID BEARING UNDER CONCENTRATED LOADS 12. FINISH ALL GEILIN65 WITH 5/8' 6YPSUM BOARD. IS. PROVIDE 26 -6AU6E GALVANIZED SHEET METAL FLASHING ABOVE WINDOWS AND DOORS. (WP) LAP BUILDING PAPER OVER. 14. HOLD SIDING 6' ABOVE FINISHED 6RADE, TYP. 15. WINDOWS SPECIFIED ARE MF6R. BYE SUMMIT OR EQUAL. U ■ PER SCHEDULE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL ROU6H OPENINGS. Ib. FASTEN MULTI -LAM 2x BEAMS PER I.R.G. STANDARDS, CHAPTER 6, TABLE R602.5(I) TYPICAL. I1. ALL VOIDS TO BE FIRE/DRAFT BLOCKED PER I.R.G. SECTION 8602.8 18. INSTALL WATER HEATER PER 1461 NAECA. PROTECT FROM IMPACT PER 2005 I.M.C. THE PILOTS, BURNERS, HEATING ELEMENTS, AND SWITCHES SHALL BE A MIN. OF 16' ABOVE THE 6ARA6E FLOOR PER 2005111.C. 19. STRAP THE WATER HEATERS AT POINTS WITH IN THE UPPER I/9 AND LOWER I/9 OF ITS VERTICAL DIMENSION. LOWER POINT SHALL BE MINIMUM! 4' ABOVE CONTROLS 20. FURNACE TO BE PLACED IS' ABV. FLOOR ON I HOUR FURNACE PLATFORM Y'V (2) 5/4' LAYERS PLYWOOD. THE PILOTS, BURS, HEATINb ELEMENTS, AND SWITCHES SHALL ALSO BE A MIN. OF 16' ABOVE THE 6ARA6E FLOOR. PROTECT FROM IMPACT PER 2005 I.M.C. 21. DOOR BETWEEN HOUSE AND 6ARA6E IS TO OE 20 MINUTE RATED' OR SOLID GORE, WITH SELF- CLOSURE. 22. ALL SMOKE DETECTORS TO BE 110 VOLT WITH BATTERY BACK-UP, INTERCONNECTED. 29. INSTALL DIR. VENT RRPL-. PER TERMS OF LISTING AND MF6R5 SPECS. PER SECTION 81001 IRC. 24. PROVIDE CONT. HAIVRAIL AT STAIRS A MIN. OF I I/2' FROM WALL, REFER TO DETAIL I ON SHEET NO. S. 25. LIGHTING CONTROLS FOR INTERIOR STAIRWAYS MUST BE PROVIDED AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE STAIR. 26. WALLS WITH 6REATER'THAN 600 PLF REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF A Sx MEMBER AT ABUTTIN6 PANEL E76E5 AND SILL PLATES. FOR MALLS BETWEEN 950 AND 600 PLF, ANCHOR DOLT SPACINS HAS BEEN I7ECREASED BY 1/2 (USE 2x ImEMBER5). PER R409J.6 I.R.C. 21. m a LOCATIONS OF FLOOR REGISTERS 2b. TUBS AND SHOWERS, • FIRE BLOCKJN6 BETWEEN STUDS. * LIMIT SHOWER FLOW TO 25 6P. M1. * WATERPROOF RPROOF Y'HALL TO WITHIN 10" ABOVE DRAIN INLET. * ALL 6L AZIN6 WITHIN 70' ABOVE DRAIN IM ET TO BE SAFELY 6LASS. • VAPOR BARRIER BEHIND GYPSUM SD. e 6' -ON L 6 ' -0 u PROVIDE MIN. Ib'x24` GRAY_ SPACE ACCES6 +56' HST. 61) - . - L TYPICAL 4x14 if.T`. *2 15) P.T. 2x4 SPAt ED DECKING PARTIAL SEGTTON * MOLE HOUSE FAN GOIt CT TO APPROVED 24 HR. TIMER SCFFIT,VENT + INSULATE AT CANTILEVER G ARAGE PL 16380 O.H.6D. PL PL Il SOFFIT + INSULATE AT CANTILEVER SC L E • V4' • I'-O' WEN • 177 St EZ , "'"" Ilk 000 MiC7) sti t: f V rt � RECENED (YTM o T. Jk v � PUNT CENTER • Ii S f m 2X10 P.T. 2Xb P.T. BLOGK'6 Ia. to X6 "CONC. ISOLATED FOOTIN6 14/ (2) M4 EA. WAY FINISH PER ELEVATION 0/ 15 LB. BLDG. PAPER OR OR AIR INFILTRATION BARRIER 0/ SFEATH'6 PeR PLAN, BEYOND 2X P.T. LED6ER W/ (2) 5/b'x 6" L. 6ALV. LA6 SCREWS • 24" 0.C., TOP 4 BTM ST Fl 2X4 P.T. DECKING 1 10 • 1*-.."to L *41. I P4' 2Xb P.T. DECK JOIST • lb' O.G. SIMPSON LU26 JOIST HAN5ER I OR EGI., TYP. . • • 9 r• • 8 " IN. 2 O 2x4 P.T. DEGKIN6 • A 2x10 H.F. *2, P.Y. TREADS, TYP. DECK IN NOS' IN& IO"MIN 2X6 P.T. TOP RAIL 1X4 2X4 PICKETS • 5 5/6' O.G. 2X4 BOTTOM RAIL 4X4 POST 2X4 P.T. DEGKIN6 2Xb P.T. DECK JOIST • 16' O.G. 4X14 HF *2 P.T. BEAM SIMPSON PG44 POST GAP 4X4 P.T. POST SIMPSON PG44 POST BASE TREAD 2X6 STUDS • 16' O.G. W/ 5/4" T46 PLYWOOD SUBFLOOR 6LUED AND NAILED 2X FLOOR PER PLAN5 2X6 STUDS • 16" . b O G. W'I/ R -21 BATT. INSULATION FINISH PER ELEVATION 0/ 15 LB. BLD6. PAPER OR OR AIR INFILTRATION BARRIER 0/ SHEATH'S PER PLAN, BEYOND GONNECIT ION 2xb P.T...5T 0113‘40.G. NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCAB ; 2x4 P T. DECKIN6 DBL 2xb J0 5T5 SIMPSON HU22 2 BBL, SLOPE H A 16ERS • TO 55', TYPICAL 2xIO H.F. *2, P.T. TREAD'' TYP. TREAD TE TYP. 2x12 P.T. STRJ R DECK STAI DETAIL T FRAM I N* NOTES I. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE NS OVER SCALED DIMEIONS 2. PLATE HE I6HT 9'-O' THIS FLOOR UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. S. ALL HEADERS TO BE 4x10. D.P. *2 k4-ESS OTHERWISE NOTED, GfEGK PLAN. EQUIVALENT PARALLAM BEAM MAY BE SUBSTITUTED IN PLACE OF BEAMS 4 HMS. 4. BOTTOM OF HEADERS TO BE T'-8' THIS FLOOR UNLESS NOTED 0TFEIRWISE. ALL 5. A EXTERIOR WIALL.S 2x6 WITH R -2I INSULATION UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 6. ALL FRAME NAILING TO SATISFY SECTIONS 8502, R602 • 8602 I.R.G. BLOCK ALL PLYWOOD EDGES AND NAIL WITH IOd AT 6' O.G. TYPICAL ALL EXT. WALLS. 9. PROVIDE DOUBLE JOISTS OR BLOGKIN6 WHERE PARTITIONS OCCUR ABOVE. 6. PROVIDE SOLID BLOGKIN6 OVER SUPPORTS. M. FIRE BLOGKINALL 6 AT ALL PLC*' IN6 PENETRATIONS 10. ALL STORAGE AND SPACES UNDER STAIRCASES TO BE FINISHED WITH 5 /b" TYPE 'X' 6YPSIJM BOARD. II. • DENOTES SOLID !MARINO UNDER CONCENTRATED LOADS USE (2) 2x6 AT • WALLS. ALLS. USE (2) 2x4 AT 4' WALLS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. FINISH ALL CEILINGS WITH W 6YP.�IJM BOARD. 15. AT 6ARA6E USE 5 /b" TYPE 'X" 6YP. BO. AT ALL COMMON WALLS, ALL GEILIN6 AND ALL EXPOSED BEAMS 14. FASTEN MULTI -LAM 2X BEAMS PER IRG STANDARDS, CHAPTER 6, TABLE R602.9(1), TYPICAL IS. HANGERS AT POSITIVE CONFECTIONS TO BE SIMPSON OR E UAL. 16. ALL VOIDS TO BE FIRE/DRAFT BLOCKED PER IRG SECTION 8602.9 I -. PROVIDE CONT. HANDRAIL AT STAIRS A MIN OF 1 I/2' FROM WALL., REFER TO DETAIL 1 ON SHEET NO. 5. • 18. m- LOCATIONS OGATIONS OF FLOOR RE61511 3 . K. MAIN FLOOR PRAMIN6 TO BE 2x10 HF *2 FLOOR JOISTS • 16" 0.C, TYPICAL UNLESS NOTED OTFERWI5E, PLAN SHOPS DIRECTION. f K311 3.3 Open rises are permitted pro. ided that the opening l+emeen treads titles riot permit the passage of a 4 -inch diameter •ps' re_ I E:xc:-pt for stairs :.ith a total rise of 30 inches or less R502.2.1 DECKS. Where supported by attachment to an exterior wall. decks shall be positively anchored to the primary structure and designed for both vertical and lateral loads as applicable. Such attachment shall not be accomplished by the use of toenails or nails subject to withdrawal. Where positive connection to the primary building structure cannot be verified durine inspections. decks shall be self- supporting. Decks with cantilevered framing members. connections to the exterior walls or other framing members. shall be desiened and constructed to resist uplift resulting from the full live load specified in Table R301.5 acting on the cantilevered portion of the deck. A •\. 1 • SIMPSON 2x HU H6R5 SIMPSON L5U26 -2 DBL.. JOISTOR EQUAL, TYPICAL SIMPSON L U26 JOIST HANbER OR EQUAL, TYPICAL SIMPSON LU2b JOIST HAN� OR EGxJAI,/ SIMPSON LSU26 -2 DBL. JOIST NAN6ER OR EQUAL, TYPICAL SOFFIT + INSULATE AT CANTILEVER SIMPSON HH4 - ',. HEAVER HAN6ER ON E.A. DVS, TYP. p u 6` -O x S'-Oax 4" CONCRETE SLAB 2x12 P.T. LED6ER - P4/ (2) 5/8 "x 6' 6ALV. LA6 SCREWS • 24' 0.G, TOP 4 BOTTOM STA66ERED PARTIAL SECTION SOFFIT + INSULATE AT CANTILEVER SIMPSON Ii.A22-2 DBL. OR EQUAL. SLOPED HANSERS Ma TO 38', TYPICAL 2x12 P.T. STRIN6ER. TYP. (2) 2x12 P.T. STRINE:ERS, TYPICAL SOFFIT • INSU.AT AT GANTILE v PL - SIMPSON L.U26 JOIST HAN6ER OR EQUAL, TYPICAL On OF FelozcEP,rE34 • E l 4 IIAJN moat 1,2i• St. L_VIER moat TT/ Sr. TOTAL AREA 2,105 St. 6ARA6E 40 St. MAIN FLOOR FRAMING NQT I. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS 2. PLATE HEI6HT A`-O' THIS FLOOR U.N.O. S. ALL HEADERS TO Bid 4x10. D .P. r2 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, CHECK PLAN. EQUIVALENT PARALLAM BEAM MAY BE SUBSTITUTED IN PLACE OP BEAMS 4 HORS. 4. BOTTOM OF HEADERS TO BE 1' -b` TNI5 FLOOR UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS 2x6 WITH R -2I INSULATION U.N.O. 6. ALL FRAME NAILING TO SATISFY CHAPTER 6 I RC. BLOCK ALL PLYWOOD ED6e3. ALL EXTERIOR SHEATHINb NAILED WITH 10d AT 6' O.G. (ED6E) AND 12' O.G. (FIELD), UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, TYPICAL. '1. PROVIDE DOUBLE JOISTS OR BLOCKING WHERE PARTITIONS OCCAJR ABOVE. 6. PROVIDE SOLID BLOGKIN6 OVER SUPPORTS. A. FIRE BLOGKINS AT ALL PUJHBINIS PENETRATIONS IO. ALL STORAGE AND SPACES UNDER STAIRCASES TO BE FINISHED WITH 5/8' TYPE `X' 6YPSJM BOARD. II. • DENOTES SOLID BEARING UNDER CONCENTRATED LOADS USE (2) 2x6 AT 6' WALLS. USE (2) 2x4 AT 4' WALLS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. FINISH ALL CEILINGS WITH 5/6' 6YPLJM BOARD. 15. AT 6ARA6E USE 5/8' TYPE 'X' 6YP. 8D. AT ALL COMMON WALLS, ALL CEILING AND ALL EXPOSED BEAMS. 14. PROVIDE 2b -6AUSE 6ALVANIZED SHEET METAL FLASHING ABOVE Y4INDOW.S AND DOORS. (TYP.) LAP BUILDING PAPER OVER. IS. HOLD 5101N5 6' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE, TYPICAL. 16. WINDOWS SPECIFIED ARE MF'6R. BY, SUMMIT OR EQUAL. U is PER SCHEDULE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL ROUSH OPENINGS. I,. FAST84 MULTI-LAM 2X BEAMS PER I.R.G. STANDARDS, CHAPTER 6, TABLE R602.9(I), TYPICAL lb. HANGERS AT POSITIVE GOIGE3CTIONS TO BE SI1PSON OR EQUAL IA. GEILIN6 JOISTS TO BE 2x6 AT 24 0.G., TYPICAL U.N.O.. PLAN SHOWS JOIST DIRECTION. 20. ALL VOIDS TO BE FIRFJDRAFT BLOCKED PER IRRG SECTION R602.6. 21. INSTALL WATER HEATER PER I•81 NAEGA, SEE SHEET I. PROTECT FROM IMPACT PER 2005 1MC 22. FURNACE TO BE PLACED i6' ABV. FLOOR ON I HOUR FURNACE PLATFORM Y4/ (2) 5/4' LAYEIRS PLYWOOD. D. PROTECT FROM IMPACT PER 2003 HNC. 25. DOOR BETY4334 HOUSE AND SARA SE TO BE 20 MIN RATED, SOLID CORE, T16HT FITTING, PITH SELF CLOSURE 24. INSTALL DIR. VENT FR!°L_ PER TERMS OF LIST INS AND MFriSRS SPECS. 'FEET SECTION RI001 I RG. 25. PROVIDE CONT. H AIVRAIL AT STAIRS A MIN OFI V2' PROM WALL, l TO DETAIL ION SHEET NO. 5. 26. STRAP THE WATER HEATERS AT POINTS PITH IN THE warm 1/9 AND LOVER 1/3 OF ITS VERTICAL D1MENSSON. LOV R POINT SHALL BE MINIM/4 4' ABOVE CONTROLS 27. MALLS YrTH GREATER THAN 550 PLF REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF A ex I.EMBER AT PANEL AOVITINS EDol:S AYO SILL PLATE'S. rat MALLS eETY'!!EN 900 AND 600 rl.P, ANCHOR BOLT SPAC INS HAS BEEN DECIMASED BY 1/2 NW 2x SELL PLATT;). re it R403.1* MC. 26. L66HT NIS CONTROLS FOR INTERIOR STAIRWAYS KIST OE PROVIDED AT THE TOP APO BOTTOM OF THE STAIR. 24. 0 • LOCATIONS OP FLOOR IRE ISISTERS 80. M.L. SMOKE DETECTORS TO EE 110 VOLT »T}1 19AT7E Y BACI+G r. INTERUANECTED. 91. TUBE AND 15WIPI 7!'i1 • FEE O OGKIN6 EIETWEEN STI,I7 • LWIT SMOVIBIt ROM TO 23 6P.M. • tweervioor MALL TO ',M 10° DOVE DRAT% INLET. • ALL 6LAZ a 1',1 *1 10' - r_ V E DRAIN INLET TO OE r r !WAS6. • VAPOR SAIRIIIIM MOW OYINSUI4 BD. +56' FEI6HHT TAIL TYPICAL DINING LIVING mss.' ■� Ewa I UPtifkil •!�+�:� II 1/2" 3 4' -IO" 6' -2 1/2" ,' -2 1/2" 3 -1N 2' -2" B.F. GOATS SOAK TUB SET IN RAISED TILE PLATFORM 1._2. 3 ' -q I /2" !21-O' 2' -3 3/8' SOFFIT AT C AI" 7 i ) SCALE 1 V4' • +< H 20' -0" 42'_0" 42 2_03 St. 6'a' E 404 SP. q ,_ 5 „ 10' - ?" INSULATE L EVEIt EEC.. 1 6 2005 SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY �a - City 7 1; Oir' a REviEWED v COY-- COm, L! I' Nr = sontsr itch • • -■ i• , • �,....114 FlEcevED OTM OF T UK1MS.A - _ 4 • ••■• owArseR. A SAVE iilA1 01141111041 PIE 11► POW Ilk - 4 • 16 I, ID. MODEL. QTY. 14!526 11 io Atli &A, PErAl R -5b I NSUL.ATI ON SIIsP ON HI SEISMIC (OR !GU) AT EACH TRUSS 2X CEILING JOISTS • 24" O.G. (OR TRUSS PER PLANS) 2X6 STUDS • 16" O.G. R -2I BATT INSULATION NNAI 2'X DIAGONAL BRACES to 46' O.G. MAX N N 5 /S' TYI"E 'X' 61.8. ovER►wNs SEE PLANS (2) 2X4 2X4 !WILL FRAMING SKYLIGHT DETAIL COMP. SHINGLES 0/ 15 LB. FELT 0/ 1/2' GDX PLYWOOD 0/ 2x RATERS OR TRUSSES • 24' O.G. INSULATION BAFFLE EXTEND 12' ABV. INSUL. I I/2" GLR. AIRSPACE VENTED 2X OLOGKIN6 W/ TOENAIL PER IRG 8606.1 S` CONTINUOUS METAL GUTTER 2X FACIA BOARD FINISH PER ELEVATION 0/ 15 LB. BL.D6. PAPER OR AIR INFILTRATION BARRIER 0/ SHEATHING PER PLANS PREFAB. ROOF TRU56E5 SCALE i I. • I' -0• PLATE AT ROOF/FLAT 2 X 6 BUILT -UP CURB SKYLI6HT TO CONFORM MV IRC SECTION R90b.6 SKYLIGHT SIZE PER PLANS W/ 4' MIN FLASHING AS RECOMMENDED BY MANE (LOWER PANEL AND UPPER PANE_ TO BE SAFETY 6LASS) MIEN THE SKYLIGHT IS 12' ABOVE THE WALKING SURFACE, THE UPPER AND LOWER PANES ARE TO BE LAMINATED GLASS. /I 4 4 .i, ,N, %1s Pia P GABLE END TRUSS DETAIL . CURB • % RAFTERS OR TRUSSES ■ S. BEYOND ■ NOT TO SCALE 51MP'SON A55 OR 1.90 OR51M.• EACH BRACE • GAF -END TRUSS 2X BLOCKING • EA:H BRACE 5-I6d PER BRACE 2 -I6d @iNNAILS • EACH END OF BLOCKING - SCALE • 1' • i'4' 2. I DENOTES SOLID BEARIN6 UNDER CONCENTRATED LOADS. 5. SEE FLOOR PLANS FOR STRUCTURAL BEAMS AND HEADERS. 4. ALL RAFTERS TO BE. 2x0 FP *2 AT 24' O.G. TYPICAL U.N.O. 5. ALL TRUSSES TO BE AT 24` O.G. TYPICAL U.N.O. ROOF FRAMING NOTES . SHADED AREAS DENOTE DUMM'r FRAMING OVER ROOF FRAMING BELOW. . PROVIDE ROOF VENT°! PER SLG. Rb06 IRG. . ROOF PITCH TO BE 4112, TYPICAL UNLESS OTHEPRWI5E NOTED. b. lb" O.H. TYPICAL • EAVES $ 6' O.H. TYPICAL • GABLE ENDS, RAKES. APPROVED A1.4 HORS SHALL BE USED AT ALL CONNECTIONS OF RAFTERS, JACK OR HIP TRUSSES TO MAIN 6IRDER TRUSS (PER TRUSS MANJF) WHERE APPLICABLE. PROVIDE "SIMPSON" HI FRAMING ANCHORS AT EVERY AT EACH END AND AT GABLE END TRUSSES. 10. VENTED BLOCKING OVER SUPPORTS. II. CHIMNEY HEIGHT TO BE 2'-0' MIN. ABOVE ANY PORTION OF BUILDING WITHIN IO'-O PER IRG SECTION RJ00I.6 12. BRACING. (STICK FRAMED AREAS ONLY) • (2) 2x4 UP TO 10' LON6. • (2)2x610'TO14'LONG. • (8) 2x6 OVER 14' LONG. 19. PLATE HEIGHT' • LOWER FLOOR 4' -0`, rm. U.N.O. • MAIN FLOOR 4' -0", TYP. U.N.O 14. TRUSSES. • GARRY MF6R. STAMP. • DO NOT ALTER WITHOUT BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL. • INSTALL AND BRACE PER MF6R. SPEC. • NON - BEARING WALLS SHALL BE HELD DOWN FROM THE TRUSS BOTTOM CHORDS WITH AN APPROVED FASTENER (SUCH AS SIM PSON STG). 15. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL ROOF SUPPORT BRACING OR POSTING AND PROVIDE ADEGUATE BEARING TO FOUNDATION. 16. 1T. HANGERS AT POSITIVE CONNECTIONS TO BE 51MPSON OR EQUAL NAIL ROOF SHEEAT1N6 Y'V bD COMMON • 6' O.G. AT PANEL E76E5 AND AT WALL PLATES BLOGKIN6 AND •12 0.0 FIELD, TYPICAL PER IRG R602.5.I. ROOF FRAMING NOT • TRUSS ENGINEERING: G: PER IRG R602.10.1 TRUSS ENGINEER. OF RECORD MHO WILL REVIEK APPROVE AND NOTE ON THE DOCUMENTS THAT THEY HAVE FOUND TO BE IN 6N . CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDIN6. THE ENGINEER-APPROVED WILL •n. 4 BE FORWARD? TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR REVIEYI AND APPROVAL 'PRIOR TO PRAMMIN6 INSPECTION'. GIT'r' APPROVED DOCUMENTS SHALL BE ON THE JOB SITE AT INSPECTIONS. TRUSS ENGINEERING SHALL INCLUDE SPECIFIC TRtJS6 !BRACING REQUIREMENTS. HANGAR SCHEDULE i A " ri : ' 7 , jzo ,-- ,orAl :AW4/4.4 VAirftr ff --- A r- 0 .10 74 r . • iri � (o � pp ✓�. 1111F21E RI 121E11110 IL I 2x5 O.G. 6" O.H. 0 D.N. ._ GABLE END WALL SHEATHING MUST EXTEND UP GABLE TRUSS TO ROOF. 2x OUTLOOKS, • GABLE END NO *GUTTER x 41 4 • O.H. 0 L3- IN PROVIDE M. 22"x90' ATTIC ACCESS P1/ MATHER- STRIPPING PER CODE 5IMP°SO A55 TYPE CONNECTION, TYPICAL. ROOF SHEATHING DOES NOT MED TO EXTBi RAA � IMD R OVER - MING TO 61RDER TRUSS. ROOF VENT CALLS. te rR MATIY moor A. 1216 SP. / SOO • 425 SP. VeNT.46 HIV. 'S 4Z S.F. I 2 • 215 S.F. 'Ti lMO !!!'OD AT moor Ra6eS„ .e MSS 2 SF. / (.44.c 5) • 6 VENTS M. FECENED , 11414.11 wtw CENTER ' .) • • SPACING OF RAILS IN DECKS OR BALCONIES TO BE 9 I/2' SUCH THAT A 4 "• SPHERE WILL NOT PASS THROUGH, TYPICAL ROOD BRACKET, SEE DETAIL ON THIS SHEET NO SUTTER 50PfIT • INSULATE AT CANTILEVER CONCRETE SLAB 20 I8' MAX. OFF [6,121 2050 SKYLIGHT 4 PT [ELM(/' SCALE . /---COMPOSITION 5HlNbLES 1 41 NI I___ —1 i s1. DiOr'!1 POOTI L- - rot SITE commons L —ij, e sTEP DOWN FOOTING PER SITE GCITIONS 2050 SKYU6HT I/4' I'-0" 516GG44GAP II 5/G,"♦ A RD FOR 4x4 POST; I bA ('7YP FOR I I L 2 I /4 "( TYP. EA. END) 5 /b ". MB BRACE DETAIL MIDPOINT OF H16HEST RIDGE + T.O. PLATE T.O. t SLEF LR CO • MAIN 1 TO. PLATE T.O. PLATE Rl 6RADE 4x14 BEAM 4x4 BRACE m O *It It ELEVATION NQTES O Cf T. PLATE in in '1 t ((1 T.O. SL FLOOR �• LONER ROOF BRACKET . PROVIDE CONTINUOUS : -ETAL GUTTERS TYPICAL. . PROVIDE ROOF VENTS PIM IRG SECTION 8806.1 TYPICAL 3. PROVIDE 6ALVANIZED SHEET METAL FL.AeHIN6 AND COUNTER THING, AT ALL ROOF PENETRATIONS INCLUDIN5 CHIMNEYS. . REFER TO SECTION RIOO1 IRO. FOR CHIMNEY CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE YEATFE R- STRIPP1NS AT ALL DOORS At" 1/111 4170145. CAUUC ALL JOINTS AND PBCTRATIONS IN EXTERIOR T.O. SUBFLOOR • ENTRY LAND'S 6. BRICK TO BE SUPPORTED BY STEM LINTELS AND SHALL NOT BEAR ON moo . FINISHED EXTERIOR GRADE TO SLOPE AWAY FROM BUILOINS AT A SLOPE OF AT LEAST 211 FOR A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET. Cr. POST APP110VED NUMBERS OR ADDRESS ON TIE Dre LING,. ADDRESS SHALL EE PLAINLY VISIBLE AND L.E6ELE FROM THE STREET FROWNS THE DI"SLINS. STRAI6HT COLUMN G,'-6 "x 5'-2'x 4' CONCRETE st_Aft CONTINUOUS FOOTINS in • IELIEVAU 1/4" it I'-O" SCALE • • r-0. ROOF BRACKET SHIN.LE STYLE SIDIN5 2x9 SILL NV 1x4 STOOL 1x4 TRIM 1x4 CORNER TRIM SOPPIT + INSULATE AT CANTILEVER 6" LAP SIDING L DEC 7 S 2005 •rya... a �..a r rt''4 a NO SUTTER b" MAX. OFF 4x4 PS. POST, TYPICAL Mc4 dt/1GE DETAIL Tl •S 3 TYPICAL. is* PS. POST. TYPICAL RECENED c .10 ` ;h. ,�vv T OIRAPIIIIIL A. *AYE MIE ltlIMI Ilk - - _.••■■■. ......er ELECTRIC RESISTANCE wished ished OTI-ER FUELS X CHAPTER 6 PRESCRIPTIVE X CHAPTER 5 TRADE -OFF= total glazing Insulation: \ Option number - IV . Proposed Vaulted ceilings . R -30 Max glazing allowed RS 21.00 Flat cellhgs /attics R -38 Proposed glazing 56 11.00 , Exterior walls R -2I Max. gla zing u -value allowed 0.650 ,House/garage common walls R -21 Proposed glazing u -value 0.341 Floors over unheated spaces Max. door u w -value allowed 0.400 . slab perimeter R -IO Proposed door u -value 0.390 Ducts in unheated spaces R -8 6LAZIN6 SUMMARY - total wished ished each - dcxr* er 98.140_ 140.200 2105 SP. total glazing - 58'1.44 3?. total u.a. 121.14 % of glazing 17.00 R _avg- u-' _ _ O. 41 0.35 0.5 each - dcxr* er 98.140_ 140.200 cfm - settinag 6LAZIN6 SCHEDULE - PLAN 2I035/A/2 LOCATION roc rm sad. reG rm trsm o v laundry Gsmt bd rm -4s1dr bdrm - 5 !ICI" Summit dinln�_rm 5.94. dlnin9 rm tram abv kitchen s 1dr mast•r bath sldr master bdrm sldr bdrm�- 2 sldr bdrm - 5 sldr Summit entry sidelights Summit entry tram abv It trc:IzoId abv trsm Summit _Hying rm sldr Summit TOTAL SKYLI6HTS main bath JKYLI6HT TOTAL LOCATION KITCHEN LAUNDRY LOGAT10N MASTER BATH MAIN BATH LOWER BATH 1' ANur. mom. trim e Summit 8b10 virNx I I 6.00 Summit '� 8630 vinyl 16.00 • It 8610 vinyl I 2 Summit ' 8650 vinyl 1 It `u meit `..x mmit Summit 8650 vinyl I Summit 8650 vinyl I Summit 8650 yirl I Summit 8650 vinyl I 8650 vinyl I 8630 vinyl 2 vinyl I vinyl 1 MACK Crysta l lte EXHAUST VENTILATION SYSTEM source speclf Ic exhaust ventilation 100 cfm 50 cfm 50 cfm 100 cfm 100 c fm 8650 vin I 8610 vinyl 1 8630 vinyl 1 8630 8630 8650 MODEL custom nutone% nutone /eq nutone /eq nutone /es nutone/eq alum/tb c wt I50 q� q� gt150 gtI50 MOLE HOUSE EXHAUST VENTILATION SYSTEM Combined use of source specific fans as indicated above . `101.H.' Fans indicated above as being '.H.' (Mole House), are to be corrected to an approved 24 hour timer. ��3EG CHECKLIST TABLE 6-2 • I1 115 62 62 115 115 N ARCA OAS AIR i L r U TOT 6.6"1 -T 40.02 � alr I/2" yes 0. 13.21 1.00 6.00 air I/2" _yes 0.320 1.92 2.00 4.00 8.00 air 1/2" yes 0.330 - 2.64 6.00 5.00 30.00 a ir es 0.350 10.50 520 5.00 25.00 a ir IT , yes 0.350 8.15 .w 6.00 6 .61 40.02 air I /2" yes 0.330 13.21 6.00 1.00 6.0 a ir I/2" yes 0.320 192 4.00 3.60 14.40 _ca I/2` des 0.350 5.04 4.00 5.0 • 20.00 air I /2 ye 0.350 '7.00 6.00 5.00 30.00 air 1 /2" Ass 0.350 10.5_0 _ 5. 5.00 5.00 25.00 air 1/2" _yes 0.350 8 .15 Ka c - 3 --- 5.00 25.00 air I/2" . __yes 0.350 _ 8.15 1.25 6.00 15.00 air . yes 0.320 4 .80 3.00 1.00 3.00 air I /2" yes 0.320 0.96 6.00 5.00 30.00 o 1r I /2" ` yes 0.320 9.60 6.00 6.00 36.00 air I /2" _yes 0.350 12.60 358.44 2. cfm cfm cfm cfm cfm qe W H 2. 150 150 150 2X6 WALL 4. 00 4.00 cfm cfm cfm cfm cfm BAR 'A' •• rax OAS air no no ia+rowc.+s AIR 1 /2" n/a n/a r± /a 1.5 1.5 w • CI L r yes U 0.40 IV. TOP ANCHOR BOLT bras��ws��a • aV ••as, •s tax. �••�s■�t ar s r as a fras. /SUP ea • Mwr�sa AMP Qa••a lL B5MT. HALL I PONY 120.14 TOT 1.60 140 p ROOF ONSTF1)C.TION • COMPOSITION SHINGLES • 50* FELT INTERWOVEN • SOLID THING • GEILIN6 JOISTS PER PLAN • R -98 BATT OR B1AYW -IN INSULATION MIN. • GAS FEAT • 3/8" 6YPSUM WALL BOARD • CEILING WALL CONSTRUCTION • SIDING PER ELEVATIONS • 15* BUILDIN6 PAPER • I/2' GDX PLYWOOD SHEATHIN6 (OR EGUAU • 2x6 STUDS AT 16' 0.G. • R -2I BATT INSULATION MTH VB. FACE STAPLED. FLOOR ONSTRUCTION • FINISH FLOOR PER PLANS • 5/4' Tt6 PLYWOOD 6LUED AND NAILED • FLOOR JOISTS PER PLAN • R-SO BATT INSULATION MIN. OVER UNHEATED AREAS • POST AND BEAM SUPPORT BELOW JOISTS OVER 6RADE • CRAW_ SPACES • 6 MIL BLACK VAPOR BARRIER M walts VIRIND T1 BAR 'A' • `ar r ai we WI ea Mora & S w•llra & a •••wry •uwra►as • Mw WelfrORGINi SOWN" HORIZONTAL 1 TOP ANGK R DOLT w •xra1111 • 1w s1•s• rr s •►wafter ea. NO' SUP MIL sa►ea aw, Mae 4P4116 BSMT. 6ARASE FON. 6IRDER TRUSSES 2x6 RAFTERS NO 6UTTER 2x6 STUD • 16" O.G. k'✓ R -2I BATT. INSUL. 2x10 TRIM, TYPICAL SOFFIT + INSULATE AT CANTILEVER CONTINUOUS FOOTIN& FDIEL,M2 OIECTil DOOR AND FRAME THRESHOLD 2x10 JOISTS�lb O. 234 511/0 • 16' O.C. PI/ R -2I BATT. WILL- 2x10 FLOOR JOISTS • 16' 0.C. 1^V R BATT. T. !NSLL_ !UNDER STAR CRAPL SPACE FLASHING DOE. 2xb P.T. RUN BEAM 2x P.T. LIpD6ER L.A6 SCRIMS • Q�ALV. • 24 OL. TOP I BOTTOM STAIS6EREP 2050 SKYLI6HT PONY WALL - 2x6 STUDS • 16" 0.G. W/ R -2I BATT. INSULATION L P. ISOLATED FOOT'6, BEYOND - SEE DETAIL *5 ON SIFT 2 wa its I • EXTERIOR PL1110017 FINISH r 2x0 P.T. PECK JOt5TS LU20 J2t5T ltAN6C'1, TYP. SLOPED NANSENS TO 36'. TYPICAL 2,d0 HP. •2 P.T. TREADS, TYF. TREAD in s1 TREAD Ot 2xi2 DOL. P.T. 511 TYPICAL. SEE PLANS . Co- x 5' -0'k 4' GOf1GnE'TE sow • V 2x4TleT(LOCK • 1/4' s I'-0" SIM GOPlPOSITION SHINbLE5 INSULATION BAFFLE T.O. PL. • MAIN RAIL HEYONC3 O SueFt_ooR in • MAIN T.O. PL. • LAR O O 9 RAIL BEYONI T.O. O SUBFLDOR cl1 • LONER T.O. PLATE FINISHED GRADE ~ City Of 7: 4 ;E1► IEA ED F CODE COW -, �L CODE Drrtnt 'rn C.� • i m PIK & ADE cry F 1,14V A C. r a PO? CEI4T0 PILE ea MIMI ilk ■,. I I RiEvED COLE (Ad ' 1 F AN`E ' or, DI'1t r DEC " • 2005 "It, ..3+ tAKw ;-- .. ROOF DAAPITRAwM e.OLOIDrARY NAILIILIG PER NOTES %c & x FW OR bse, K. ad Q ''Fx C. Q A�►+�E .L Ec* s 4 12`o .c. t'J FIELD OMER SHEAR WALLS SAL ' TRUSS WvEpr Z WE. Q o SIMPSON A3S ! 24'0. C. � 4 E�lt viim.t. 3 SMEAR MILLS FIECENSD CtlY OF %1Proollik C = = p TOS t`3� osv A •AY! Mai 4. 0 • HP6 w/ (2) VW + THRLOOLTS ($) STLD6 MIN DEL MP TO POST SCE SHEAR WN1 r 1 SHEAR NALL MR !BOTTOM PLATT MAIL IN6 11a - 6' OL. 2 X VW NALL- CONCRETE - - GEE PLAN PLAN FOR LxATLOM 4 TYPE x P.T. MWSILL Y'V S/0' DIA x 10 AO • 4b' OZ. 12• MON L � MIN. z I MIL STRAP PER FLAW OIL. JOIST I BOTTOM PL. NAILI I6d - �• o ,c . W�..L a� tio (2) 16d - •' O.G. TO eL.�OCKIHIG -- S +M�PeoH, HaI.Da'�I PLAN NOR TYPE .- AND LOCATION L.AP EXT�IIOR Pm I V 4 T. it NAIL A RIM .SST. OR NAIL Ate' CLIP • 52' OL. moor Joteir — / •4 GOVT. RISK. TO WALL AB. x 10' - role sla BRACING OM PLAN AS4 SINNIC) •S2S OL.NOR GONE.. M &1 H > 4'�' NM MR R rrrIGA1 SHEAR t HORIZONTAL WAPHIRA6M MAwAiG SCE NOTES • NOR PANICS w/ Y'LI LESS THAN 4%0' LAP PLYNOOP OVER RIM JOIST 2x W.ocKINIEI' • MALL 1"LOOR JOIE • PL 0° JOIST, rn. 1 1 11 1 II + D SPAIN ORIENTED ( Y ) VERTICALLY) LL NM STRAP • 61110 - See P LA N _ EXTEND POST TO ( IrAilliii-.11 PLAN 1 1 i I } r I E DIAPHRA•f'� NAILING - r II WE PLANN •4 ' `' �� j GOVT REAL ::::::::::::::.:44. • o °4. S � w w0wa. •w4 " ' _BOTTOM ' �� I I !� �• ` GONG. WALL - SEE PLAN ` OP DOL. JOIST FLOOR SONS 1 SEE PLAN GONG. I ND WALL �� "'S: II' �- ,. .. r ...t ' • ( PLAN) A. x 10 - FOR SIZE I % SPACING SEE PLAN K.T._ 2x !LOCK** NV b • JOIST • DLAPII. BEAN - SEE PLAN 4x4 P+oO MIN. ((A901 STEW ROD b • PPE R PLAN GONGIRETt rooms - DOME JOIST NAILED W/ 1`d • 12 b O. STAb His - STRAP TO EVAN -- MV O Od TO DOLCLE JOIST rr/ HEX HEAD OOLT MIN TZDO O D (24)I6d - (2)2x STUDS • ALT - USE ALL THR R w/ a5/4 ALL O (14,•159 Z er • .. , . FOR SIZE PLAN AN : � • � � MBAR - 51S PLAN • e • NOTE. FOR TYPICAL SHEAR POLLS t HORIZONTAL DIAPHlRAMM HALMS SCE NOTES SHEAR ''WALL • FOUND. SHEAR WALL • POUND. WALL (PLOOR JOIST PARALLEL TO WAIJ.J 3 SECTION 4 SHEAR WALL • INT. FON. PT L. SHEARNALL PARALLEL PI/JOISTS 5 SHEAR WALL • INT. PON FT* 'MANAMA. PERPENDICULAR TO JOIST'S L. ARDOR JOIST PEPIPENDICAILAR TO MALL) 0 L. HE SHEAR WALL PL. TYP. SHEAR NALL - SEE NAIL SCHEDULE 2x MP NALL 'LOOK JOIST - SEE P AH NOTE. O • PARALLEL. NAILING FOR SHEAR WALL tr L' rORLL OR @rRCVIM mimes 2x SHEAR NALL . . I ' ( , 3T1JD ESOTTOM lid 1 HORIZONTAL - SEE WALL WALL PL NAILWI . - • 04. (U.O.N.) NOTES FOR NAILING JOIST - a! PLAN SIZE t SPACING M S • ML 'STRAP f �Y JN OR/AAD RIM - PROVIDE VOL OL.JC r✓ RIM I , I ' rw�L.L SCHEME i BOTTOM PL. NAILING { 1 Od - 6 OL aka) (b) Lad 4 Pti PI RA6Ml I INTO OLOGKING I HORIZONTAL It i Z. l �AltlNb MOTE. root SHEAR WALL Q OR ®PREeVEI:NT Nouns* r -a ' , RAM VOL °X 2x SOLID OL�OGKINO �.+ � _. r : - .� ., • i ► lad - •• 04.. N.Na� , I• ,,yR J6d - `• oz. r HoRIZONTAL OLAPHRA6M IiORIZOItf AL DIAP RAOM t ` _ J As NAILtIV 1 il ! II Il • BOTTOM P • RIM C` HALMS 2x STUD I r N 1 ' , ir T • 1 ¢ i � FLOOR FOR VOL DOME JOIST 2x SOLID OLOBLOCK** re/ 10d • 6' 0G. T O TOP PL.ATL' - - 6. 13d - GO�OL.L!Jt • 4' OL. OMB - NAIL-VW ♦ 'nine i p soup DL4GKING • OL . 2x NAILER W/ IOd - 6' O.G. �t OL # #•M Wl 5 - I6d INTO EilrO ST D farga POR TY'''ICAL.. SHEAR POLLS 4 I'IORIZOKTAL. DLAFHRA6H NAIL** SCE PLAN t TYP. NOTES - - I , DOME JOIST NAILED r,/ Ibd • 12' 0L. - ST MOTE. NOR rVPICAL. SHEAR WALLS 4 HORIZONTAL. DIAPHRA6M NAILING SEE NOTE! HaTEI FOR TYPICAL. S A AR PALLS t HORIZONTAL Nom . j... TYPICAL n.. -n. &C.•... Y'1/N.LS t HORIZONTAL _ ��� D INS SEE N HORIZONTAL rot SAD. t� riot TYPICAL SHEAR /MALLS t HORIZONTAL DIAPHIIRAe�M PALM SEE NOTES OLAPFRA6M NAILING SEE Hones DUIPF NAY.INQr see ( � TYP I GAL SHEAR ("17 TYP I GAL SHEAR WALL PARALLEL Y4TH PLO JOIST) p� ?YP I GAL SHEAR WALL (PARALLEL WITH JOISTS) �Q TYP I GAL SHEAR Z WALL TO FLOOR JOIST) I TYP I GAL SHEAR WALL (FLOOR JOIST erstrerviCALAR TO WALU I I TYP I GAL SHE (JOIST PARALLEL. PITH W 'MALL TO WALL PERPENDICILAR TO FLOOR JOIST) WALL EkTT�YN11LpiG NAL. PLYP OD re/ IOd /-- SHEAR WALL HEAVER (EXTEND TWA/ _ NOTES ON SK ET SI MR MUM 2x WP • - - -- .: 24 OL. - SEE TOP PLATE 2x4 HEADER PANEL) ., PLATE ! i APPMONN I WALL MOIRIZOKTN.. .- I i f fib MTAL PLAWT'tA'' 1 NOTE'. POR SMEAR P4AL L i j /Q opt ®P!!!'vEltr SPLrTTLHIi PARALLEL VOL e1.JC .--ASS �+I'*SOw 40520.C. W/ O - Od NAILS INTO tr RIN Jolsrs aL.xKlr�G • IMAM llN/411. 14 - PLAN i 1 MOM Ab4 A 92' I e-iSd E ?1W1 24• t�IH*SOR� s / SHEAR wAL.L rererr'X'ri.. HA LMS �' IGd - s O.G. ( ac BLOOMS JJOIS 4 DIAPH. MT _ `' OL. INro BL t TOP > p 1 o )4 IH p A_ MOOR , J - -- - - 4x4 POST ' ( I I E1[ %j • G/ i i i ONE SIDE V4/ „........, ilk, •se4 rsote (ox ES)) HI SEISI4C CLIP AT EAGI� T111J06 _ �,_, =4 I . ' .w w I ICMi • I I 2x BLOCS 4 D 2 x OLDCKINS I . IV � # X 11 SHEAR NALL D�OM OL. JOIST I NAILED PI/ Ibd - I2' 0.C. NOM FOR TYPICAL SHEAR MOLLS t HORIZONTAL NNLM SEE NOTES I'�t: FOR TY}"IGAL SHEAR Y�1AL1 t HIORIZONTAL. DIMHRA6M MUMS SEE NOTES . - . 3 . M 5-I6d • JOIST t DL MHL FOR TYPICAL SMEAR YW.LS t HORIZONTAL OIAPHIIRA6M NARJHIi SEE mom PIAPHRAIIM s - ' • i • ` . . xr. a ihr.6) � � 04 CONT. 15 EAR )04A L L O TO JOIST) r SHEAR WALL. OFFSET (PARALL� TO JOI!! 15 SHEAR WALL OFFSET A'1.GOR JOIST TO ISICIE NAL NALL TYP. SHR. .L. - . co. NN (PLUSH BEAM) TYP. SHR. WALL -- 5t. CONN. I (DROPPED EIEAM) h 1 SECTION cl SECTION � . 2xe ELK16 NIL. rd (2) 16d • b• OZ. SSTG /11 CUP .., - , . OIS 4'-0' METK. 'STRAIT r 211 I) M5TAS6 r4/2b - 10d NAILS BEAM/DOUBLE ..IST. SEE PLAN LAP SWATH on PROVIDE AMP PLAT • 92' 0.G. 2•6 BLOOMS* KSii R EGIV ONLY • 41.11.5. HORIZ DIAPHRA6M (SPACED SHI:ATHIlH6 4100 21( a.OGtCtiiG M. RC>t0' DVrPHltA64 AT 4d' • 4 L. S!E - - - - - - -- - - - - - 141L1 I PIeAB. MOWS AT 24' (SEE FLAW MN. !�Tl.„/ J SEE PLAN _� P► _ = • TOP PLATE GNr HHOL.ES A -NOT SHOI"fI GLARrTr C1.0 IL�[IG TO PRRE1/El NT / _ _ R NAILS 'E !±!!L 1E5/0"x4' *NUNS- S1= MILS •M ROL UM MAT WEPT TM TOP PLATE TO PROVIDE A 2 MA L•is a�`ALE or *Mk NAL- TO ALL MEP11!J!S • COLAS • LEAST Cr Slll;! FROM AIO ESail3CPNM I (13) - 10d - ■rte tt: r•� �� � �r . A _ RE Q'D - -•� • MtTCRWR CONDITION OL. O R OOF R APIERS SOLD A.O�.a0IG 4.O'' DC. 2 t2' -lid • 0.C. I ; SPRJT'rI1i6 - r'r t !PT 11. I sEE POST FLAN /DESL. CRIPPLE I FOR HIM. i SUPPORT R&M. I a - A6d TJ7 UPTR:R . pe.ac: MP - 'TM. ' Sid • 6' OL. xt.iti&Toffyggewr MIL SRO"' MR PLAID G JR. A ND BE STRAP " D11 SHE AR DETAIL L O t _ ',Jrl rout TAR J3T: REAM - - 2x S1LP NAL.L K 51 I FOR SHlAIt r -~'�' ' MML.L TYPE NAIL 10 art SCNISA t See HOLDOM SC LALZ sect' A-A TION POR ADDITIONAL aro. - 2 SHEAR WALL poor ~Awn_ pm% wr 1RiISees/ r2 I I GULAR TO HOL.DOY�i DETAIL 2 INT. HOLDOWV DETAIL 2x MUM . fi •d MILS • 6 0G. ' SHEAR MALL 1111.+0 , - t - • 4' OC. frantibe- - "-' O ; _ - = • CI EE FLAN) w Oita IV •d V !lCAR MALL isme PLC 'UHG' 03S- IV 2rc 'MO MALL ac OM*. IY Aid • 6' OL_ J AP SHEATH INS At L OR AI CUP MOM IMi. RAT AM R7 ► • s2' O <i0 • 1' OL ..� ac S1 U7 MALL 2rc BUM _ !~ 16d • 6' OZ. LAP SHEARS* OR GL! MULE NAIL FLJ►T IRIS 10 sew► • Sr 0 • • os. 1'LATD Ee 24* AR 2,4 i/d O N Li'D • twM�LJlD • * ' Ok • OL. 2 x SLACK • ) OR HMV CUT . DR. • 6' oL. H s 1 I / =41 ad • 6' OZ. 21e BLOCK • e FOR HOLD our FOR OIL. 21c ft_ AFT OR 1>RI� e M Gal CHORD t • S• - . U. OLGC�S • !•' OG , OM 2x aLartallO , - FL/V1 t WSJ lid MTO 1RRIIII • ILI7� . . - �4 • w - ti t MO r t 1 ROW PLY. aI ILR..iTl f ► i �� t A.Jt..�tl J � • V SILL - MB ( ruse - t j ;; I r T O w .. Ari OR • /' - �,� _ ' �� POSTI� CRIME SEE ALM 1. _ = ai PL. JOT OPt r OMB r RIO.. JOIST OR OIL - I Q 110� Jlvs* IEat o wl. rut ,ails - - :: i / . FEet w •: t _ PM *MR = LI N GILT) BIM AML. IMLim. >a !LIRA VW IWM- IP.Else ter WSW ARC. t !!AR SWILL 11N11.110- AM alt aR Kr 41 Sr ac at LOCIONII • aG IMP w ONO MOIR *MOOR rLy. AID •• • V Ot4 !al PM !' WAR '� PPP PLAN —11111- � 6 MALL P TO 5 R /TACT. P TO 111i� M � T'10R - GINIC ILO r ewe R�Oatca tam. • SECT' t I RiEvED COLE (Ad ' 1 F AN`E ' or, DI'1t r DEC " • 2005 "It, ..3+ tAKw ;-- .. ROOF DAAPITRAwM e.OLOIDrARY NAILIILIG PER NOTES %c & x FW OR bse, K. ad Q ''Fx C. Q A�►+�E .L Ec* s 4 12`o .c. t'J FIELD OMER SHEAR WALLS SAL ' TRUSS WvEpr Z WE. Q o SIMPSON A3S ! 24'0. C. � 4 E�lt viim.t. 3 SMEAR MILLS FIECENSD CtlY OF %1Proollik C = = p TOS t`3� osv A •AY! Mai 4. 0 IOLDOVI'I 1116.1121Le Mk III MGM SIMPSON Sim TIC HOLDOVIN SAMSON 20015 GATALOi - FD4 -4'IR VALUES FOUNDATION LEVEL HD N A ' Al t 1- a , - HOEDOWN TYPE STUD TYPE FASTENER TO STUD ANCHOR BOLT CAP KIPS DETAIL NUMBER STHD 8 _ (2) 2X_ (24) ibd _ - - 2.31 5THD10 (2) 2X_ (28) Ibd (383 Ibd _ _ _ _ _ _ 2.99 4.45 STHD 14 (2) 2X_ PHDb O 2X_ (I 13)5D55 - 1/8" 0 5.86 PHDS (2J 2X_ (24)5D53 l/8. • 6.13 HD46 4X_ (20) 5D55 1/8" 0 8.55 HDIOA 4X.._ 4 X- 6X- (4) 1/8" m 1/8" P 9,54 HD14A HDI5 (4) I' ♦ I" m 11.06 (5s) I. m T 1 -I /4" t - I iR. III SASGIES SIM'PSON MOM TIC HOLDOI+W SIM 2000 GATALO , - fe4-1911 VALUED OTHER LEVELS HD * HOLDOWN T'A' _ PE STUD 'TYPE FASTENER TO STUD TIE ROD GAP KIPS DETAIL NUMBER C5I8(36 ") 2X_ (I8) 10d _ _ _ 1.21 (2) C520(36 (2) 2X_ (18) 8d EA _ _ _ 2.01 (2) C5t8(36 ") (2) 2X_ (I8) IOd EA _ _ _ 2,54 (2) C516(48 ") (2) 2X_ (28) 8d EA _ _ _ 5.30 MST 5X_ (56) Ibd EA 5.80 (2) MST48 (2) 3X_ (42) Ibd EA 1.63 (2) M5T6O (2) 3X_ (46) Ibd EA 8.92 (2) M5T72 72) 3X_ (56) Ibd EA _ _ _ 11.60 HDI5 6X_ (5) I 0 5/4' 0 5.30 HOLDOVN NOTES ORAL. WT1'.S A) MINIMUM CONCRETE GOMPRESIVE STRENGTH TO BE 2.5 K5I (11.2 MP&. B) REFER TO MANUFACTURERS' GATALO65 FOR MINIMUM DISTANCE TO FOUNDATION CORNER G) REFER TO MANUFACTURERS' GATALO65 FOR MINIMUM BACKING MEMBER SIZE. D) REFER TO MANUFACTURERS' CATAL065 FOR ANCHOR BOLT EMBEDMENT DEPTH. E) POSTS AT HOEDOWN, 2X i 4X (38mmX 4 89mmX) _ _ _ *2 OR BETTER bX ( I40mmX ) _ _ -HAVE OR BETTER F) THE ANCHOR TYPE HOLDOWNS AT OTHER LEVELS SHALL HAVE A PAIR, ONE ABOVE AND ONE DELOYN, TIED BY A THREADED ROD. 6) USE 5THD8R.J FOR STHD8, STHDIORJ FOR STHDIO, AND STHDI4RJ FOR 5THDI4 Y41-ERE RIM JOISTS ARE INSTALLED. (H) THE STUD FASTENER FOR STHDS SHALL BE Ibd SINKERS. (I) MINIMUM STEM WALL TO BE v" WIDE FOR I -STORY HUILDIN65, 8" WIDE FOR BUILDINGS HAVING 2 OR MORE STORIES. aoia o.n.•, 040*11M Mc. SIAM MU- SCHEDULE HIS III SPECIES VW SHEATH** by IOd BOX 5 W • SHEAR WALL SHEATHIN6 [THICK (SIDE)] ED6E NAILIN6 I (IN OC) ANCHOR BOATS (IN OC) BOTTOM PLATE (IN OC) RIM/BLK TO TOP PLATE (IN OC) JALLOYNI SHEAR (1CLF) NOTES © 0 Q 0 1 1/16l 05B (I) 1Od • 6 5/8" • 48 Ibd • 5 A35 • 24 W/ 12 -Sd 0.23 _ 0.34 I 1/16' 058 (I) IOd • 4 5/8' • 32 Ibd • 3 A35. 16 w/12 -8d 1 1/16' O5B (I) IOd • 3 5/8" • 12 Ibd • 2 A35 • 12 r4/12 -8d 0.45 13,5 //lbw 05B (IT IOd • 2 5/8" • 8 Ibd • 2 A35 • 9 w/12 -8d 0.60 133 1/16" 050 (I) lad • 4 5/9' , 24 518' • 1S 2 -I6d • 3 2 -A35 • 15 w112 -8d 0.10 1-6 1/16' 058 (I) IOd • 3 2 -16d • 2 2 -A35 • 12 rt112 -8d 0.90 1-6 //lbw 056 (2) IOd • 2 5/8" • 12 2 -Ibd • 2 2 -A35 • 9 r4112 -8d 1 .20 1-6 SHEAR MALL NOIES OENE RA1.. NOTES (APPLY TO ALL SNIEM M AL.L Z) A) FOR RATED SHEATHING PANELS, SPACE NAILS • 12 IN (305 MN1) O.G. ALONG INTERMEDIATE FRAMING MEMBERS. B) BLOCK ALL PANEL EDGES WITH MINIMUM 2x (5I MM) BLOCKING. C) APPLY NAILING TO ALL STUDS, TOP AND BOTTOM PLATES AND BLOCKING. D) FRAMING TO BE A MAXIMUM OF 24 IN (610 MM) O.G. E) FASTENERS SHALL BE DRIVEN FLUSH WITH SURFACE OF SHEATHING. F) PROVIDE SOLID HLOCKIN6 UNDER THE SHEAR WALLS AT TPE DIAPHRA6M5 TO ACCOMKODATE THE BOTTOM PLATE ATTACHMENT. 6) OFFSET PANEL_ JOINTS ON EACH SIDE OF WALL MINIMUM ONE STUD BAY. S m C : L A _ tames root MEM r I A L Z (APPLY T O HALLS sreCLrIGALLY t 1 ) 1) APA RATED SHEATHING EXPI / EXP2 / EXT OR G-C, / G-D / STRIUGT. II PLYYk OD. 2) PROVIDE 3x'S (76 NH) AT ADJOINING PANEL EDGES Y'V NAILS 5TA66ERED. 3) PROVIDE MINIMUM 3x (16 MMI) BLOCKING OR JOISTS BENEATH BOTTOM PLATE YIITH BOTTOM PLATE NAILS 5T 4) WALL5 WITH 6REATER THAN 095 kir USE A MINIMUM OF A 3x SILL. FOR WALLS FOR WALLS EIETYEEN 035 AND 060 KIP, ANCHOR BOLT SPACING HAS BEEN DECREASED BY V2 I5E 2x Vim). 5) FRAMING TO BE A MAXIMUM OF Ib IN (b10 MM) O.G. FOR SHEAR WALLS I AND 2. 6) PROVIDE NAILIN6 AT INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS THE SAME AS ED6E NAIUNS IN 5HEAR WALLS THAT USE 6V (SHEAR WALLS I AND 2). 1) FOR SHEAR WALLS 2, 1, 8, AND 9. PANEL JOINTS SHALL BE OFFSET TO FALL ON r)!FrEtzefr FRAMING ME11515R5 OR FRAMING SHALL BE 3' NOMINAL OR THICKER, AND NAILS ON EACH SIDE SHALL BE STA66ERED. awa •.... MaOIN.r..IL STRl1GTURA NOTE I. LATERAL ANALYSIS trl5! 2005 G. METHOD WIND). SEISMIC ZONE D SIM SOw STROM TIE CONNECTIONS !'!'!R CATALOG G -2005. 2 PRITTEN PIMEN540145 TAKE PIRECEDENCE OVER 5CAL37 D aiONL'S. 9. BASIC MIND SPEED • 95 MPH EXPOSURE CATEGORY • 15 5EIS14C ZONE • D 4_ TRIBUTAR v' !ROOF. 2106 DL • 29D LL ROOM t0• DL • 40 LL i9N.L3. IEP DL • --- s. ALL r1R/1F'E HAIL& I6 TO SATISFY CHAPTER 29 eG_ EICYJG ALL PLYPDOP ED6E:S. ALL EXTERIOR 9 A/WIG NAILED MTh IOd AT •" O.G. f 'DIE) AND 12' O.G. trzuv UNLESS NOTED OTHERVISE. M. • 4WD TOTAL a RP TOTAL a EP TOT/IL '- 0194:7 1ES STRAP HOLD DOM LOCATION • 120401E5 ammo HOLD POMl1 LOCATION • • • 171910TES SHEAR PIALL LOCATION 1. FOR MATERIAL STRENGTHS, PLEASE SEE SHAT R. D. Plitovve ':Ui'3 x1/4• THICK STEEL. MASHER AT ALL ANCHOR DOLT LOCATIONS. PER 2005 IRR., SECTION Ri02.11.1 4. nAu.5 PITH !MEATIER THAN SW PL.F RECIUIRE A 14J OF 5x 1-R AT /MITT •16 PAWL EDGES AND SILL PLATES_ FOR rL4L.L5 EMMEN 500 MO 600 PLY, ANCHOR DOLT SPACING HAS 0E194 DECREASED BY Lr2 NOE 234 . IBC TABLE 29.5.4 110. AT ALL REQUIRED CORNIER LOCATIONS. PLACE STRAP HOLD PONS 50 THAT t OF HOLD DOMRM 15 5" IN PROM CORNER TYPICAL. A4 A D01R.L. E STRAIN 15 RED, !'LACE 30 THAT END STRAP 4, IS 9" IN PROIM COMM TYP_ IM. AT ALL REGUIRED r INDOM LOCATIONS. PLACE STRAP HOLD 170 PIN SO THAT t OF HOLD POPO is I-4/2" GUT ' room EDGE or OPEP11116. TYPICAL_ MIEN A MIME STRAP !,' PIEG UIRED, PLACE SO THAT B47 STRAP E IS I-I/2' N MOM EDGE or OPENING. TYP. 12 AT ALL RISSIARED DOOR LOCATIONS. AI.LOrI I-4/2" TO STRN* f mom DOOR tRiOMS GPlNeIb. mum IIS 2-V2" Pilb:94 POOR EDGE ON PLANS. THIS ALL OPIS 1• FOR DOLOR MAME. 19191 A DO<EL E STRAPS IS AEOLIIIIIED. PLACE 90 THAT 1.17 STRAP IL IS ! -I/2" IN PROM ROUGH OPENING, TYP. 4 1 r L r VI LODE CC +,�. 1 D Est, Of T jwwisA RECEIVED , /WV. Mort CENTER ft • • STRl1GTlJRAL NDTES I. LATERAL AI4ALY'SIS PER 2005 IBC, METHOD IOrND), SIEISI4C ZONE D SRfSON STRONG TIE CONNECTIONS PER CATALOG G -2000. 2 Mlt1TTE34 DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DR 5/45 S. BA5IG 1'•117 SPEED • 8S !"!°H CATEGORY • D SSC ZONE • 4. 1RIEUTAIRY LOADING. ROOF. 208 DL • 258 LL FLOOR. E58 DL • 408 LL POLLS( !.R Ot. • 4a• TOTAL_ • 5151 TOTAL. a 88 TOTAL. S. ALL NEAT NAILINS TO SATISFY CHAPTER 25 IBC. BLOCK ALL PLYONt OD Ems. ALL EXTERIOR SHEATH,* NAILED NTH KOd AT b' O.G. ,) AND 12' O. D) UNLESS 1iK7T '!.D OTHEIRMISE, TRAP. DENOTES STRAP HOLD 100114 LOCATION • MIMES BOLTED HOLD OIOM'M LOCATION - - oelvTES SHEAR MALL LOCATlGN . t 1. FOR MATERIAL 51R N61N5, PLEASE SEE SHEET 01_ b. PR01/1DE S'x5Sd/4' THICK STEEL MASHER AT AU- ANCHOR BOLT LOCATIONS. PER 2003 G. SECTION R602J I J 9. MALLS LS METH GOMM= THAN WO PL1R REGUIS E A MINIKIM Or Sic Fit AT ABUTTING PM. ED6eS AND SILL PLATES. FOR V4ALL5 BIEWEEN MO AND 600 PLF, ANCHOR BOLT 5PAGR1S HAS BEEN DECREASED BY 1/2 A "L 2x . IBC TAa.,m 233 -4 10. AT ALL REWIRED GOIIPIER LOCATIONS, PLACE WRAF MILD DOPO4 SO THAT 4. OF HOLD DOWN IS 3' M FROM COMM TYPICAL_ M114EN A DOIJELE STRAP IS REWIRED, PLACE SO TNAT END STRAP 4. 15 S' R4 19 94 COMM M. SI_ AT ALL REQUIRED 0*417014 LOCATIONS. PLACE STRAP MOLD Di01114 50 THAT 4. OF HOLD 1,011114 IS I -1r2 our mom EDGE OF CPENI ib. TYPlGI MEN A DORM STRAP IS IREGUIPIED. PLACE 'SO THAT END STRAP f, IS I-4,9 N rmOp4 EDGE CiF °PENNS. TM_ 12_. AT ALL IREGUIPIED DOOR LOCATIONS. ALLQI7 I -1/2'" TO 51RAPi MOM DOLOR ROUGH °PENNS. MUCH IS 2 -112' mom DOOR EDGE ON PLANS. THIS fr4J ib r rout DOOR MAKE YINE114 A DOUBLE STRAP IS 011152UIRED. PLACE '317 THAT IMP 511 4. !s I-VT IN !"HOPI ROUGH OPCNI III!'r, TYP • • I City . • l■".W -AR It e'1• 1 . 0" "44 rft # et% • RECEIVED Cry 3F 't''IVILA C • M � PEWIT CENTER f R f l OR III I* SIMPSON 511w0NO TIC HOL.120YW SIM PSON 2000 CIATAL"Oi - M•14911 VALE IOUNDATION LEVEL HD HOLDOWN TYPE 5T1)17 TYPE FASTENER TO STUD ANCHOR SOLT GAP KIPS DETAIL NIMBER STHDB - (2) 2X_ (24) I6d _ _ _ 2.31 5THD1 . (2) 2X_ (28) Ibd - - - 2.99 5THD14 (2) 2X_ (38) Ibd - - - 4.49 PHO6 ( X- CO 2X_ X18 )SD53 (24)51753 1/8" R 5.86 PHDB 1/8" m 6.13 HD 2S 4X_ (20) 5P53 1/8' m 8,33 HD 10A 4X_ ---------4X2.- "4X_ _ 6X_ (4) 1/b" m 1/8" m 9.54 HDI4A (4) IN • (5) r m r 4 J -I /4" m 11.08 HDI5 1”.2 SOIL III SWAM SIM PSON SIMI* TIE HOL DOM N SIM P SON WOO CtATALOi - M! 'IR VALUE'S OTHER LEVELS HD M HOLDOWW TYPE STUD TYPE FASTENER TO STUD TIE ROD CAP KIPS DETAIL NUMBER .> C516(36 ") 2X_ (I8) 10d _ _ -. 1.21 (2) C520(36 ") (2) 2X_ 7iii.J 8d EA _ _ _ 2.01 (2) C518(36 ") (2) 2X_ (lb) 10d EA _ _ _ 2,54 (2) C4I6(48 ") (2) 2X_ (28) 8d EA - (56) _ _ _ 3.30 MST12 3X_ I6d EA _ _ _ 5.80 (2) MMT48 (2) 3X_ (42) Ibd EA 1.63 (2) M5T6O (2) 3X_ (46) I6d EA _ _ _ 8.92 (TMST12 2 3X_ (56) Ibd EA 11.6 ` HD 15 - bX_ (3i) I " m 5/4" m 1590 HOLt OW4 NOTES OBNI RAL. NOM A) MINIMUM CONCRETE COMPRESIVE STRENGTH TO BE 2.5 K51 (112 MPa). B) REFER TO MANUFACTURERS' CATAL065 FOR MINIMUM DISTANCE TO FOUNDATION CORNER C) REFER TO MANUFACTURERS' CATALOGS FOR MINIMUM BACKING MEMBER 51ZE. D) REFER TO MANUFACTURERS' CATAL069 FOR ANCHOR BOLT EMBEDMENT DEPTH. E) POSTS AT HOLDOVIN: 2X i 4X (38mmX 4 89rrwnX) _ _ _ *2 OR BETTER 6X ( I4OmmX ) _ _ _ *1 OR BETTER F) THE ANCHOR TYPE HOLDOWNS AT OTHER LEVELS SHALL HAVE A PAIR„ ONE ABOVE AND ONE BELOW, TIED BY A THREADED ROD. &) USE STHDBRJ FOR STHDB, STHD I ORJ FOR STHD I O, AND STHD I4RJ FOR STHD 14 bI ERE RIM JOISTS ARE INSTALLED. (H) THE STUD FASTENER FOR STHID'S SHALL BE 16d SINKERS. (1) MINIMUM STEM WALL TO BE 6" WIDE FOR 1-STORY BUILDINGS, 8" WIDE FOR BUILD I N65 HAVING 2 OR MORE STORIES. 3000. •M•. 11111.1141111% Mc. SHEAR MALL SCHWILLC GIL III SPECIES -I/IS` SICATHINS NV IOId BOX 5V4 5 • „THICK SFEAR WALL SHEATHING I (SIDE)] ED6E NAILING (IN OC) ANCHOR BOLTS (IN OC) BOTTOM PLATE (IN OC) RIM/8LK TO TOP PLATE (IN OC) ALLO W SHEAR (KLF) NOTES I Q GI 0 Q 0 1 _1/16' 1/16" 05E3 (I) IOd • 6 5/8" • 48 16d • 5 A35 • 24 V4/ I2-6d 023 1/16' 058 (I) IOd • 4 5/8" • 32 5/8" • 12 Ibd • 5 Ibd • 2 A35 • lb A/12-6d A35 • 12 A/12 -8d 0.34 0.45 13 1/16" 056 (I) IOd • 3 1/16" 058 (ir 10d • 2 5/8" • 8 I6d • 2 A35 • 9 A112-8d 0.60 1 ,3,5 1/16" O58 (I IOd • 4 5/8" a 24 2 -Ibd • 3 2 -A35 • 15 A/12 -8d 0.10 I-6 '1/16" 058 (I) IOd • 3 5/8" A IS 2 -I6d • 2 2 -A35 • 12 rt/12 -8d 0.90 1--6 OS8 (2) IOd • 2 5/8" • 12 2 -Ibd • 2 2 -A35 • 9 r4/12-8d 120 1-6 OW* WALL lIOrT'CS d NOMAL NM= (APPLY TO ALL SHEAR WALL.) A) FOR RATED SHEATHIN& PANELS, SPACE NAILS • 12 IN (305 MM) O.G. ALONG INTERMEDIATE FRAMING MEMBERS. B) BLOCK ALL PANEL EL E5 WJTH MINIMUM 2x (5I MM) BLOCKING. G) APPLY NALLIN6 TO ALL STUDS, TOP AND BOTTOM PLATES AND BLOCKING. D) FRAMING TO BE A MAXIMUM OF 24 IN (6I0 MM) O.G. E) FASTENERS SHALL BE DRIVEN FLUSH WITH SURFACE OF SHEATHING. F) PROVIDE SOLID BLOCKING UNDER THE SHEAR WALLS AT THE DIAPHRAGMS TO ACCOMMODATE THE BOTTOM PLATE ATTACHMENT. 6) OFFSET PANEL JOINTS ON EACH 5117E OF WALL MINIMUM ONE STUD BAY. SPECIAL NOEL'S PO* SHEAR MALLS (APPLY TO L 3 SPECl7CM LY Nam* V APA RATED SHEATHINS E)CPI / EXP2 / EXT OR C-C / C-P / STiZUCT. II PLYV OD. 2) PROVIDE 3x5 (1b MM) AT ADJDININ6 PANEL ED6E5 W/ NAILS STA66ERED. 5) PROVIDE MINIMUM 3x (?b T41) BLOCKING OR JOISTS BENEATH BOTTOM PLATE WITH BOTTOM PLATE NAILS STA66ERED. 4) WALLS WITH GREATER THAN 0.35 kM USE A MINIMUM OF A 3x SILL. FOR WALLS FOR WALLS BETYIEEN 035 AND 060 kW, ANCHOR BOLT SPACING HAS BEEN DECREASED BY 1/2 (USE 2x MEMBERS). 5) FRAMING TO HE A MAXIMUM OF 16 IN (610 HMI) O.G. FOR SHEAR Y4M LS I AND 2. 6) PROVIDE NAILING AT INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS THE SAME AS ED6E NAILING IN SHEAR WALLS THAT USE 6i98 (5I-EAR WALLS I AND 2). 1) FOR S MIALI5 2, 1, 8, AND 4, PANEL JOINTS SHALL BE OFFSET TO FALL ON DIFFERENT FRAMING MEMEIERS OR FRAMING SHALL BE 3" NOMINAL OR THICKER, ` AND NAILS ON EACH SIDE SHALL HE STA66ERED. MOM BMW, .W • STRl1GTlJRAL NDTES I. LATERAL AI4ALY'SIS PER 2005 IBC, METHOD IOrND), SIEISI4C ZONE D SRfSON STRONG TIE CONNECTIONS PER CATALOG G -2000. 2 Mlt1TTE34 DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DR 5/45 S. BA5IG 1'•117 SPEED • 8S !"!°H CATEGORY • D SSC ZONE • 4. 1RIEUTAIRY LOADING. ROOF. 208 DL • 258 LL FLOOR. E58 DL • 408 LL POLLS( !.R Ot. • 4a• TOTAL_ • 5151 TOTAL. a 88 TOTAL. S. ALL NEAT NAILINS TO SATISFY CHAPTER 25 IBC. BLOCK ALL PLYONt OD Ems. ALL EXTERIOR SHEATH,* NAILED NTH KOd AT b' O.G. ,) AND 12' O. D) UNLESS 1iK7T '!.D OTHEIRMISE, TRAP. DENOTES STRAP HOLD 100114 LOCATION • MIMES BOLTED HOLD OIOM'M LOCATION - - oelvTES SHEAR MALL LOCATlGN . t 1. FOR MATERIAL 51R N61N5, PLEASE SEE SHEET 01_ b. PR01/1DE S'x5Sd/4' THICK STEEL MASHER AT AU- ANCHOR BOLT LOCATIONS. PER 2003 G. SECTION R602J I J 9. MALLS LS METH GOMM= THAN WO PL1R REGUIS E A MINIKIM Or Sic Fit AT ABUTTING PM. ED6eS AND SILL PLATES. FOR V4ALL5 BIEWEEN MO AND 600 PLF, ANCHOR BOLT 5PAGR1S HAS BEEN DECREASED BY 1/2 A "L 2x . IBC TAa.,m 233 -4 10. AT ALL REWIRED GOIIPIER LOCATIONS, PLACE WRAF MILD DOPO4 SO THAT 4. OF HOLD DOWN IS 3' M FROM COMM TYPICAL_ M114EN A DOIJELE STRAP IS REWIRED, PLACE SO TNAT END STRAP 4. 15 S' R4 19 94 COMM M. SI_ AT ALL REQUIRED 0*417014 LOCATIONS. PLACE STRAP MOLD Di01114 50 THAT 4. OF HOLD 1,011114 IS I -1r2 our mom EDGE OF CPENI ib. TYPlGI MEN A DORM STRAP IS IREGUIPIED. PLACE 'SO THAT END STRAP f, IS I-4,9 N rmOp4 EDGE CiF °PENNS. TM_ 12_. AT ALL IREGUIPIED DOOR LOCATIONS. ALLQI7 I -1/2'" TO 51RAPi MOM DOLOR ROUGH °PENNS. MUCH IS 2 -112' mom DOOR EDGE ON PLANS. THIS fr4J ib r rout DOOR MAKE YINE114 A DOUBLE STRAP IS 011152UIRED. PLACE '317 THAT IMP 511 4. !s I-VT IN !"HOPI ROUGH OPCNI III!'r, TYP • • I City . • l■".W -AR It e'1• 1 . 0" "44 rft # et% • RECEIVED Cry 3F 't''IVILA C • M � PEWIT CENTER f R f l File: D04 -0421 35mm Drawing #1 VERTICAL DATUM & CONTOUR INTERVAL BASIS OF BEARINGS ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE ON AN ASSUMED DATUM. 2.0' CONTOUR INTERVAL - THE EXPECTED VERTICAL ACCURACY IS EQUAL TO 1/2 THE CONTOUR INTERVAL OR PLUS / MINUS 1 0' FOR THIS PROJECT. OHE EDGE OF ASPHALT L FOUND TACK 8 HINER DOBBS (17683) S f SOTH STRE t I , JJJD REAR 8 CAP ONE 29537)/ i i i FOUND TACK & SHINER CRONES (29537) OHE / 1 / / i // / RECORD OF SURVEY BY DOBBS, FOC 8 ASSOCIATES AS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9310089007, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. ACCEPTED A BEARING OF S88 °08'53 "W FOR S 150TH STREET BASED ON FOUND MONUMENTS LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS, BLOCK 4 OF ADAMS HOME TRACTS SECOND ADDITION, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS ON PAGE 90, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT THE EAST 125 FEET THEREOF TOGETHER WiTH VACATED PORTION OF SOUTH 150TH STREET ADJOINING TO SAID PREMISES BY ORDINANCE NUMBER 8851 UTILITY POLE I I 1 / • < / , ' / / / OHE W cA / ass (But: Para 50 I� / `a r. I S88 ° 08'33 "E N ° 07'29 "W ?LoPosco 50' t WETL i N 0 8OF'i OA) 1Ti -IStC "IS PO' 8ulLo•NG erPAcic. l_t r- UTILITY POLE I Inch 1/16 LEGLNLI -- OHE - -- •ati5ti, 20 0 \ \ \ N WETLAND FLAGGING )pe — INDEX CONTOURS • 10' INTERVALS INTERMEDIATE. CONTOURS • 2' INTERVALS CONIFEROUS TREE (LABELED WITH CALIPER) DECIDUOUS TREE (LABELED WITH CALIPER) DECIDUOUS MULTI -TRUNK TREE (LABELED WITH CALIPERS) OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL LINES SANITARY SEWER LINES (PER AS -BUILT INFO) w WATER LINES (PER AS -BUILT INFO) STORM SEWER LINES (PER AS•BUILT INFO) '-- -- 011E as r G .J i , ■■■■• / / 5 _ __________ ____J , r / f vs0 ' r 10" 6 r • N ' v n 252.64,' 8 f t,.Jr { 1111 I1 6 5 rill Z � 6 eliAI1rill IIii i i. i. LLIIIIIIIIIILILIIIIL�LIIIiiIIIllllflllliIiii 11.11 i IIIIIIIIIIII I111IIIlIII III�i1ir IIIIIIIIIIIII a11/1 ICI •Iotba I. Welland Buffer} are recommended to be 50 feel wide, unlesi buffers are modified by averaging or reducing as may be approved by the City of Tukwila. Buffer boundaries shall be measured horizontally from the flagged wetland delineation points. New buildings shell be set back an additional "et from the buffer boundary line. 2 Wetland and buffers should be maintained as a "no disturbance" easement within this property. All regulated activities should nectar only in areas outside the buffer bouna•.ry. A title notice truly be recorded with the County Auditor to provide notice in the public record of the present: of wetland buffers within the site area. J. Final Duffer boundaries shall be marked by a land surveyor o rd signs posted at locations Indicated on the site plan mop. Signs shall be posted along the buffer boundary at JAfoot intervals In areas nearest to the proposed development. 4. No building, clearing. filling or grading shall be permitted x!thin designated buffer area, except as maybe approved by the City ufTukwila for such reasons as danger ace removal. All regulated activities shall occur only In areas outside the final buffer boundary. 5. Maintenance within the designated buffers shall include removal of Invasive or noxious weed species, Invasive species may Include introduced and non- native plants such es Himalayan blackberry (Rubin &Rotor or RuOas lnetntorus), Scotch broom (Cyrlsns emporia:), Reed canary grass (Plrnlorls arundlnnrea), or Tansy ragwort I 1'mtaceunn vulgar). Removal of invasive and noxious plants must be by hand methods such as pulling, cutting or other approved method 03 may be allowed'by the City. Disposal of plant residue must be done in approved areas outside the regulated wetlands or buffers. Wetland Specialist Certification This map correctly represents a wetland delineation made by me or under my direct supervision at the request of Jim Pitzer, Jr., Pitzer Homes, Inc., representing the Owner /Applicant, Mr. Guillermo, for the Single- Family Residence building sites at Lot B, Block 4 of Adams I lome Tracts 2" Addn., City at Tukwila, Parcel No 4 000401, and lotted to scale on this drawing. /ohryG. Cd'mis, PW Cc ified Wetlands Specialist 52.64/ Date ti7.7 It" 1 0 ____ '■,LZ 66/ / .� �,, / / 61' , �// / ./ / 1 6' 1 NOTE ; Ca NT LIa Ri N4 c iNro 4 `T�FRQLt )-i Wei LA NO %ar A.t6 S4 Tt4c :t --- 01= ■ETLANe7 (RAcatlaq L1 r. E) 15 G 'dJ Lt-7 4..cz VG TIC -r p F -nzo )-W L-L..S I ) Z A Mt:' -r h3 E G,rzle nE Tl4 Wert -At - 10 S Ad°t -' )O' (Fih l OO' /fcio,Zlz- aNVTAC • _ iff ea /05 10 20 GRAPHIC SCALE. I " ♦A"° 2A " a' tr %VS 0 L 5 t, z 3 3 0 W o os z . 2 W W Q xg E X m 0 < N File: D04 -0421 35mm Drawing #2 -5 00 � N Ph (/ ) J O = C0 _ Ph Ln O� _ r 0 Z G7 M —I l THE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT IS CROOKED AND UNEVEN. THIS PROJECT PROPOSES TO EXTEND THE SOUTH EDGE OF ASPHALT IN A STRAIGHT LINE AT THE EXISTING GRADE (-18%). THE ELEVATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH EDGE OF EXISTING ASPHALT EXTENDED AND THE WEST EDGE OF THE NEW DRIVEWAY EXTENDED (PT1) IS 102.00'. FROM PT 1, THE .DRIVEWAY WILL BE SLOPED UP TO THE WEST AT 15% UNTIL IT INTERSECTS WITH EXISTING GROUND. AT APPROXIMATELY X.X FEET WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY. IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT WATER CUURENTL Y FLOWING FROM THE EXISTING ; ROADWAY ONTO THIS PROPERTY WILL CONTINURE FLOW :ONTO ;THIS PROPRTY AND WATER CURRENTLY FLOWING ONTO THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH WILL CONTINUE TO FLOW ONTO THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH. INSTALL SLOTTED DRIVEWAY- - DRAIN WITHIN 1.0 FT OF THE EDGE OF CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. PIPE FROM ---- SLOTTED DRAIN WILL PASS AROUND THE CURRENT OF THE UPPER BLOCK .WALL AND .CONNECT TO THE DOWNSPOUT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE • HOUSE. PIPE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4' :DIAMETER 'SMOOTH WALL RIGID PIPE OR 6' CORRUGATED FLEXIBLE PIPE. MINIMUM SLOPE 'OF PIPE " SHALL BE 2'/.. IN • _. INK Oil I IN I _, MI ME w• • • • • • c ■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1111111 III I IfIilll ( " !-I ,I I Inch 1/16 101.ee 102.06 111111111144 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I) I I I I I I I I I I I I LL I LLI II I L I I�( I III II IIIIIIIl.II 1.4% 4' PVC PERFORATED PIPE CONNECTED TO THE DOWNSPOUT AT BASE OF WALL. III III Ijl IT Ij � 111 ICI i'1i III III ICI Ili III I 6 I I EII�1i • II II11�111111111�1111I1 'III II � IIII IIIIIIIIIII \e- L er\ �Y OPOSED CONC. BLOCK WALL EXTENTION EX. CONC. BLOCK WALL HOUSE 10 0 10 20 NORTH 1 " =10' r V 0: > 27 I l .. Z > tJ C ;< 0 C CO ( W oo 4s -U 00 � V) 2J O = C o U1 Co oc r- 0 -.� 0 r - o ;. I [ �• I 1 UPPER WALL WILL AFTER ADDITION T .WALL. 4' PVC PERFORATED PIPE CONNECTED TO THE DOWNSPOUT AT BASE ' OF WALL. 10 0 10 BE 3.43' O LOWER PROPOSED ADDITION TO LOWER WALL. TWO BLOCKS HIGH TO . ADD 1.1'. NEW WALL HEIGHT WILL BE 4.0'. • SECTION A-A 1' =10' (HOR), •1' =10' (VERT) 3.75' FROM FACE OF UPPER WALL TO FACE OF LOWER WALL / REFERENCE LINE AT 1H:1V APPROX. EX. GRADE 20 Il lII IIII'L lI . 1 11 1 l � � a -1.1 II . I I 1111111 IIiti11l1111111 1111111IIIIIIII a t r., K . t , . , .. . 51 I 5!. t"L E6 Z6 U. I 0 IIIIIIIIII I I II I I I IIIIIII I I III IIIIIIILLIIIIIIIIiiii iIIIIIIIIL IiII I IIIIIII .... II�III III III ILiII NO STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE CONCRETE BLOCK WALL WAS PERFORMED. THIS INVESTIGATION STRICTLY IDENTIFIED THE DIMENSIONS OF THE CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS AND THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE WALLS AS COMPARED TO THEIR EXISTING CONDITION. 11. 0 C) r N 0 0 0) oo N m O I C I r Ln co I r (/) Z 77 0 rn r ICJ THE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT IS CROOKED AND UNEVEN. THIS PROJECT PROPOSES TO EXTEND THE SOUTH EDGE OF ASPHALT IN A STRAIGHT LINE AT THE EXISTING GRADE ( -18%), THE ELEVATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH EDGE OF EXISTING ASPHALT EXTENDED AND THE WEST EDGE OF THE NEW DRIVEWAY EXTENDED (PT1) IS 102.00'. FROM PT 1, THE DRIVEWAY WILL BE SLOPED UP TO THE WEST AT 15% UNTIL IT INTERSECTS WITH EXISTING GROUND AT APPROXIMATELY X.X FEET WEST OF THE DRIVEWAY, IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT WATER CUURENTLY FLOWING FROM THE EXISTING RDADWAY ONTO THIS PROPERTY WILL CONTINURE FLOW ONTO THIS PRDPRTY AND WATER CURRENTLY FLOWING ONTO THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH WILL CONTINUE TO FLOW ONTO THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 EXX ftl'A l SLOPE = 18% 4 4 4 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 a 0 4 CR ❑DIES PK W /WASHER, ° 4 ° ELEVz10,2,18 PER SURVEY THOMAS 4 WOLDENIJORF° 4 4 10 4 0 4 4 4 4 0 4 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 ♦ 7 ,4T +7 .7 ∎7 . 7 . 7 . 7 . 7 . x . 7 . - • -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 dift .. VI A s. ■ ■ U. v I. A IV — • INSTALL SLOTTED DRIVEWAY DRAIN WITHIN 1.0 FT OF THE EDGE OF CONCRETE DRIVEWAY, PIPE FROM SLOTTED DRAIN WILL PASS AROUND THE CURRENT OF THE UPPER BLOCK WALL AND CONNECT TO THE DOWNSPOUT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE HOUSE, PIPE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4' A SW DIAMETER SMOOTH WALL RIGID PIPE OR 6' CORRUGATED FLEXIBLE PIPE. MINIMUM SLOPE OF PIPE SHALL BE 2 %. • PT1= 102.00 • 4 a • 101.62 102.06 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I III_LI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LLI I I I I I I I I I I I I I U I II'' I I II I I I I I III IIII _... ILLI11111I1. 1.4% • 101.46 102.00 3,0% 1,8% 1 HOUSE 1111 1.111 11111111111111 i. I IIII I IIil 1111 i iil1I11IIIIIIIIIII z WO 101.65 4' PVC PERFORATED PIPE CONNECTED TO THE DOWNSPOUT AT BASE OF WALL, r , 10 CITY F TU K KV VVIU1 AUG 0 9 2006 PERMIT Ot~NTER 1 1 1 1 11111 M6 1 1111 I l I I III III 111 11( I+ 11,111 111 111 11 1 II 1 11 j 1 I I111 111 ,111 1 I I III I I I I I I I Inch 1 I I w I I , 21 I * I 3,) I, I I I I ( I PROPOSED CONC. BLOCK WALL EXTENTION EX, CONC. BLOCK WALL 0 These p,` s have been reviewed by the Public Works De`\rtment for conformance with current City standar \ Acceptance is subject to errors and omissions whic do not authorize violations of adopted standard or ordinances. The responsibility for the adequacy f the design rests totally with the designer. Additions, deletions or revisions to these drawings after this date will void this acceptance and will require a iesubmittal of revised drawings for subsequent appr oval. Final acceptance is the Public Works u Date: 10 FILE COPY subject to field inspection by tilities inspector. By: NORTH r=101 rn X m rn ) � N IV (/) O O ✓ a) cn co co I D CO N) O I O N (j o O n I r -P -o W � N m OI C 2 rl (/) O C = f=- 0 Z 73 O m - 0 4R PVC PERFORATED PIPE CONNECTED TO THE D ®WNSPOUT AT BASE ' OF WALL, DWY UPPER WALL WILL BE 3.43' AFTER ADDITION TO LOWER .WALL, SECTION A 3.75' FROM FACE OF UPPER WALL TO FACE OF LOWER WALL A 1" =10' CH❑R), 1 " =10' (VERT) 10 0 10 20 PROPOSED ADDITION TO LOWER WALL. TWO BLOCKS HIGH TO ADD 1.1'. NEW WALL HEIGHT WILL BE 4.0'. NO STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE CONCRETE BLOCK WALL WAS PERFORMED, THIS INVESTIGATION STRICTLY IDENTIFIED THE DIMENSIONS OF THE CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS AND THE PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE WALLS AS COMPARED TO THEIR EXISTING CONDITION. / REFERENCE LINE AT 1H:IV APPROX. `• EX. GRADE Oft' OF Tu AUG 0 9 2006 !-'t i';"1T CENTER III 1 I I I CJY �Y � � � I f;: 7�aRG i& 4J 11111111111111 11 . 1 1 .11 111 d11.1�.11.1� . 11111 . 111J I I I L � h w9 1 II IllI IIII LLI lfII II