Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOW 2011-02-28 Item 3B - Update - Manufacturing / Industrial Center Public Involvement Strategy COUNCIL AGENDA SvivoPsis ILA ITEm No. 4)-- .ef Initials 1: h' Meetinc Date Prepared by Mayor's review 1 ouncil r-eviei.v .-T G 02/28/11 1 NG 1 t f 03/07/11 NG ITEM INFORMATION CAS NUMBER: 11-022 ISTAFF SPONSOR: NORAGIERLOFF 1 ORIG INAL AGENDA DATE: 2/28/11 ;I ITN NI TITLE Public Review Process for Manufacturing Industrial Center (MIC) Study C I'NGORY N Discussion n Motion Resolution Ordinance N Bid Award Public Hearing Other Mtg Date 2/28/11 Mtg Date Mldtg Date 3/7/11 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Si )NSOR 1 1 Council C Mayor Adm Svcs N DCD Finance Fire Legal P&R Police PIV SI'()NSOR's The Department of Community Development work plan includes a study and update of the SI'.`I \I,'RY Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code for the MIC Area. Staff has completed a background report and stakeholder survey. The next step in the original work plan was to take issues and opportunities to the Planning Commission for a hearing and recommendation. The Council is being asked to consider whether a stakeholder committee process should be undertaken prior to review by the Planning Commission and City Council. RI vII?\VI,D RY Li COW Mtg. N CA &P Cmte F &S Cmte Transportation Cmte n Utilities Cmte n Arts Comm. Parks Comm. Planning Comm. DATE: 2/14/11 COMMITTEE CHAIR: VERNA SEAL RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Department of Community Development COMMII`i'EE Forward Stakeholder Process Alternative to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT/ FUND SOURCE ExPI RI?QUIRFD AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED Fund Source: Co111772ents: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COU ACTION 02/28/11 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 2/28/11 Informational Memorandum dated 1/31/11 Resolution in draft form Minutes from the Community Affairs and Parks Committee meeting of 2/14/11 33 nn s_ Ci t of Tukwila ma M Jim Haggerton, Mayor \gin\ 1Y \.e INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Community Affairs and Parks Committee FROM: Nora Gierloff, Deputy DCD Director DATE: January 31, 2011 SUBJECT: Manufacturing Industrial Center Study Process ISSUE Should we expand the public outreach efforts for the Manufacturing industrial Center (MiC) Study? The original work plan (Attachment A) reviewed by Council included public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council as well as a stakeholder survey process. BACKGROUND The Department of Community Development work plan includes a study and update of Tukwila's Manufacturing Industrial Center and SEPA Planned Action as part of our periodic review of Comprehensive Plan policies. Manufacturing Industrial Centers are designated areas in which the region aims to preserve and enhance concentrated manufacturing and industrial activity. To be eligible, a city commits to discourage incompatible land uses within MIC boundaries. Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan vision for the MIC supports "existing and future industrial activity to maximize employment and economic benefits to the people of Tukwila and the region." The City has periodically received requests to revise its industrial land policies and codes, either to remove land from industrial designation or to allow a wider range of uses in the Manufacturing /Industrial Center. We have received two Comprehensive Plan Amendment applications for 2011 that affect the MIC area, one to add property to the designation and one to remove it. Staff has completed a detailed background report on the current conditions in the MIC area. The report entitled, Tukwila Manufacturing Industrial Center Comprehensive Plan Update Background Report, dated October 2010 was included in your January 3, 2011 Council packet. City staff briefed the Planning Commission and Tukwila International Boulevard Action Committee (TIBAC) on the information contained in this Report. DISCUSSION The public involvement process for the MIC study has begun. The public has been notified of the study via the City of Tukwila website, the Hazelnut and the "Tukwila Reporter," with a call for expression of interest in receiving information and becoming involved. All businesses, property owners and tenants in and adjacent to the MIC were sent a postcard informing them that study materials were posted on the city website, encouraging them to take an online survey and offering the opportunity to join an email update list. Three responses were received to the survey that was posted on the website. Staff contacted selected business owners and stakeholders via a letter to request their participation in a questionnaire pertaining to their operations in Tukwila. Staff has continued to contact businesses via telephone, and is conducting interviews either in- person, or via telephone according to the business' preference. To date we have been able to conduct twenty interviews and will be compiling the themes into a summary issues and opportunities paper. W:\201 1 Info Memos \M 1C_Public_Process_Alt.doc 35 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 At their briefing Planning Commission (PC) members expressed concern that these efforts may not be sufficient to gather all viewpoints and concerns. They have suggested that a committee or workshop process outside of the planned public hearings would complement the individual interviews that staff has undertaken to date. Staff has developed the following options for expanding public involvement in the process. 1. Public Workshops: We could reach out to those who have indicated an interest in the MIC Study process by joining the email list or participating in the survey process and invite them to one or two workshops to review and comment on the Issues and Opportunities summary memo. A notice would also be posted on the website. The limited time commitment for this option may increase the numbers of those willing to participate. It has taken a considerable amount of staff time to recruit the survey participants, even though the time required is approximately 20. minutes and they choose the time and type of the interview. 2. Meetings with a Stakeholder Group: An alternative would be a stakeholder committee similar to that used for the Sign Code update. The composition of that 8 member group was: 2 City Council members 1 Planning Commission member 3 Residents 2 Business Representatives In order to keep the committee at a workable size (no more than 10 plus staff) we would need to limit the number of committee members to a subset of those stakeholders who have participated so far. We suggest the following composition: 2 City Council members 1 Planning Commission member 2 Residents 4 Business Representatives /MIC Property Owners Staff would work with the CC to develop a resolution specifying the review process, staff would work to recruit interested parties and the Mayor would appoint the members. We would hold work sessions to review and comment on the Issues and Opportunities memo and develop a recommendation to the PC. 3. Move Straight on to the Planning Commission: In this option the PC would serve as the citizen review body and comments would be accepted through the public hearing process. This would allow us to move forward most efficiently and still provide multiple opportunities for public input and involvement. Whichever process is chosen we would hold a PC hearing and PC work session(s) to develop a set of recommended updates. This would be followed by a City Council hearing and possibly Council work sessions. RECOMMENDATION The Committee is being asked to make a recommendation on the above alternatives and forward the issue to the Committee of the Whole meeting on February 28' 2011. ATTACHMENT A. MIC Study Work Plan 3 6 W. \201 1 Info Memos \MIC_Public_Piocess_Alt.doc MIC Study Work Plan Clarify study goal: Purpose Update information pertaining to MIC Consider economic activity, development and development codes in the MIC in light of the Comprehensive Plan's vision for the MIC that supports "existing and future industrial activity to maximize employment and economic benefits to the people of Tukwila and the region," and perceived pressure on the MIC to allow non industrial uses to locate /expand Recommend modifications /actions as indicated 4 Quarter, 2010: Background Materials and business survey to website Prepare mailing to property owners, tenants (300 x 2) o Letter /postcard announcing study, possible issues. Request involvement via online survey, email list. Identify and contact interview candidates e Short list of possible business contacts o Boeing o Sabey o KCIA o Jorgenson Forge o Museum of Flight o Aviation High School o USPS o Group Health o McCormick and Schmick's Catering o Trucking firm o Other smaller property owners /businesses Groups o Representative of Realtors o Agency such as ECOSS, Duwamish Transportation Management Association (TMA) o Tribe (Muckleshoot, Duwamish) o TIBAC o Friends of the Hill o Interview businesses individually, either in person or by phone as business desires— C: Vemp\XPGrpWise\Work P1an1.21.11.docAttaChmeiit A 37 ist Quarter, 2011 Request guidance re public review process (i.e. stakeholder Advisory Committee, Planning Commission, etc.) Depending on direction from City Council, foiiii Manufacturing Industrial Center advisory group or use other public outreach body (i.e. Planning Commission) or hold workshop. Prepare summary of issues, concerns, possible action based on responses from interviews 2nd —rd quarters, 2011 Depending on direction from City Council, hold meetings or workshop for stakeholders and public with clear, focused agenda including data, results of interviews. Introduce alternatives o Present results to designated public outreach body, Planning Commission, CAP and City Council. Request guidance. Revise alternatives from feedback e Planning Commission hearing, recommendation o City Council review, action C: \temp\XPGipWise \Work P1an1.21.11.docAttaChnitellt A 38 itRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, CALLING FOR THE CREATION OF A MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIAL CENTER (MIC) ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND CALLING FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING CODE REGULATIONS FOR TUKWILA'S MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIAL CENTER. WHEREAS, the area covered by Tukwila's MIC /H and MIC /L Zoning Districts was designated by King County as one of four Manufacturing Industrial Centers (MIC) in 1995; and WHEREAS, Tukwila's MIC is approximately 966 acres along the Duwamish River from Boeing Field to South 125th Street; and WHEREAS, cities planning under the Growth Management Act are required to periodically review and update their goals, policies and regulations; and WHEREAS, a Tukwila Manufacturing Industrial Center Comprehensive Plan Update Background Report was completed in October 2010 and presented to the Planning Commission on October 28, 2010, and to the City Council on January 3, 2011; and WHEREAS, staff has conducted interviews with 20 MIC business and property owners to gather their knowledge and concerns about the area; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the subject of the future of Tukwila's industrial lands does not readily fit the City's standing committee structure and believes the update process would benefit from a special focus; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. MIC Advisory Committee. An MIC Advisory Committee, hereafter referred to as the "Committee," is formed to review background material and stake- holder surveys and develop recommendations for updates to the Comprehensive Plan Policies and Zoning Code regulations for Tukwila's Manufacturing Industrial Center. Section 2. Committee's Responsibilities. The Committee shall review King County's updated Countywide Planning Policies for Manufacturing Industrial Centers W:1Word Processing \Resolutionsk Creation of MIC Advisory Cmte.doc NG:bjs 2/22/11 Page 1 of 2 39 and evaluate Tukwila's compliance. They will also be advisory on issues related to adjustments to the geographic extent of the MIC, updates to the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies and any updates to Zoning Code regulations. Section 3. Committee Makeup. The Committee shall be comprised of two City Councilmembers to be determined by the Council President; and one Planning Commission member, two Tukwila residents and four MIC business or property owners, all to be determined by the Mayor. All Committee members shall have equal standing. A quorum of the Committee shall not be required to conduct meetings. Section 4. Chair. The senior City Councilmember appointed to the Committee shall serve as the Chair. The Chair shall strive to be neutral and be responsible for presiding over all meetings, directing the process and helping the Committee to arrive at consensus recommendations. In the absence of the Chair the other City Council member shall serve as chair. Section 5. Committee Staffing. The Department of Community Development (DCD) shall be responsible for staffing all Committee meetings including creating agendas and preparing review packets. Section 6. Record. In order to ensure that a proper record is kept, all meetings of the Committee shall be recorded by staff. All documents and items that go before the Committee shall be part of the legislative record. Section 7. Meetings. The Committee shall strive to limit the number of meetings needed to reach a recommendation to no more than four total. DCD will coordinate establishment of a regular meeting day, time and place. All Committee meetings shall be open to the public. Section 8. Outcomes. DCD staff will document the Committee's recommen- dations and present them to the Planning Commission and City Council. The Committee shall have an opportunity to discuss their recommendations with the decision makers. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2011. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk Allan Ekberg, Council President APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Resolution Number: Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney W: \Word Processing \Resolutions\ Creation of MIC Advisory Cmte.doc NG:bjs 2/22/11 Page 2 of 2 40 4,$),-,,,,4-, Qom. o City of Tuk w i! a 1 a Community Affairs and Parks Committee COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND PARKS COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes February 14, 2011 S. 00 p.m., Conference Room #3 PRESENT Councilmembers: Verna Seal, Chair; Joe Duffle and De' Sean Quinn Staff: Rick Still, Derek Speck, Jack Pace, Nora Gierloff, Bob Giberson, Rebecca Fox, Brandon Miles and Kimberly Matej Guests: Brooke Alford CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Seal called the meeting to order at 5:02 p.m. L PRESENTATIONS No presentations. II. BUSINESS AGENDA A. Agreement for Liahting./Energv Unarades Grant Fund Exnenditure Staff is seeking Council approval to enter into an agreement with Washington State Department of General Administration (GA) for management and monitoring services related to the execution of grant funds the City has received for lighting upgrades to City facilities. Early last year the City accepted grant funds in the amount of $129,500 from the Washington State Department of Commerce (see Finance Safety Committee minutes dated February 2, 2010). The funds are now ready to be expended and will be done so through the an interagency agreement between the City and GA. This process /agreement uses performance contracting in which the City contacts with GA and in turn, GA contacts with an Energy Service Company (ESCO) to complete the project. This type of contracting allows for the design and completion of energy /lighting upgrades and rebates at a guaranteed price. The City match for this project is $15,387, and will be funded through the green initiatives budget line item in the Mayor's Office. The total project cost is $163,904 (broken down as follows: $129,500 grant funds, $15,387 City matching funds, and $19,017 in utility rebates from Seattle City Light and/or Puget Sound Energy). Staff is requesting the Committee move this item directly to tonight's COW for discussion in consideration of the need to expend grant funds by the end of May. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO FEBRAURY 14 COW FOR DISCUSSION. B. Manufacturing Industrial Center (MIC) Work Plan Study Staff is seeking Committee recommendation and Council approval on how to proceed with expanding public involvement in the Manufacturing Industrial Center (MIC) Work Plan Study. As part of the Comprehensive Review Plan review that must be conducted by 2014, the Department of Community Development has completed the process of reviewing and preparing background information and current conditions in the City's Manufacturing Industrial Center. This information includes but is not limited to the original vision for the area, how things have changed and what the City needs to in response to those changes. Staff is now approaching the public involvement process of the review. After reviewing the options for public involvement as outlined by staff, Committee members recommended formation of a stakeholder group for review of the Issues and Opportunities Memo (see No. 2 on page 14 of the Committee agenda packet), the results should then move forward to the Planning Commission for 41 Community Affairs Parks Committee Minutes February 14. 2011- Paqe 2 4_,-- review, public hearing and recommendation to full Council. RECOMMENDATION MADE WITH UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO FIi BRATIRY 28 COW FOR DISCUSSION. C. 2010 4 Ouarter Reports The Committee reviewed the status of program goals as outlined in the 2010 4 Quarter Reports. Committee Members were informed that Administration is currently considering other options for reporting out on program goals and other important information in a more efficient and timely manner. INFORMATION ONLY. III. MISCELLANEOUS Meeting adjourned at 5:34 p.m. Next meeting: Monday, February 28, 2011 5:00 p.m. Conference Room #3 4 F Committee Chair Approval Mi utes b,. KAM. Reviewed by NG. 42