The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTrans 2014-02-24 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila Transportation Committee • Allan Ekberg, Chair • Dennis Robertson • Kate Kruller Time: 5 :15 PM Distribution: A. Ekberg D. Robertson K. Kruller D. Quinn Mayor Haggerton D. Cline K. Matej L. Humphrey B. Giberson F. Iriarte R. Tischmak G. Labanara P. Brodin S. Kerslake Clerk File Copy 2 Extra e -mail pkt pdf to A. Le e -mail cover to: C. O'Flaherty, D. Almberg, B. Saxton, S. Norris, M. Hart, A. Le AGENDA MONDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2014 Place: Foster Conference Room (CR #1, 6300 Building) Item Recommended Action Page 1. PRESENTATION(S) 2. BUSINESS AGENDA a) Residential Street Rating Program a) Discussion Only Pg. 1 Background Information for CIP - Residential Streets 3. SCATBd b) • SCATBd January 21, 2014 Meeting Summary b) Information Only Pg. 15 • SCATBd February 18, 2014 Meeting Agenda 4. MISCELLANEOUS 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS Future Agendas: Next Scheduled Meeting: Monday, March 10, 2014 IS. The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities Please contact the Public Works Department at 206- 433 -0179 for assistance. City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Transportation Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director BY: Robin Tischmak, City Engineer DATE: February 21, 2014 SUBJECT: Residential Street Rating Program Background Information for CIP - Residential Streets ISSUE Provide for committee discussion, the historical background information used to prioritize residential street improvements included in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). BACKGROUND In the early 1990's Public Works engineering staff prepared a system used to rate and prioritize all unimproved residential streets within Tukwila. The resulting data was then used to prioritize a list of streets to be funded annually in the CIP under Residential Streets. The rating system uses a variety of decision criteria focusing primarily on safety issues such as: pedestrian volumes, pavement widths, vehicle volumes and speeds, accident history, and other features. The presence of schools, parks, and other high pedestrian generating facilities is also taken into consideration. Attached are several historical documents that show staff and Transportation Committee efforts as well as construction costs. DISCUSSION The formula developed to provide the rating process will be presented in general terms for committee discussion. The numerical priority ratings were used to create the initial list of streets. Further evaluations were used to select the streets recommended for funding within the CIP. RECOMMENDATION For discussion only. Attachments: Transportation Committee Minutes Information Paper Priority Rating List (Page 1 only) Typical Costs Sheet Residential Streets CIP pages W:IPW Eng10THER\Robin Tischmak\Residential Street Rating Memo 02- 21- 14.docx 1 TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Meeting Minutes October 15, 2012 — 5:15 p.m. — Conference Room #1 City of Tukwila Transportation Committee PRESENT Councilmembers: Allan Ekberg, Chair; Kathy Hougardy and De' Sean Quinn Staff: Bob Giberson, Frank Iriarte, Robin Tischmak, Jack Pace, Gail Labanara and Kimberly Matej CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 5:15 p.m. I. PRESENTATIONS No presentations. II. BUSINESS AGENDA A. 2013 Overylay & Repair Program: Consultant Selection & Agreement Staff is seeking full Council approval to enter into a contract with KPG, Inc. in the amount of $148,959.24 to provide design services for the 2013 Overlay & Repair Program. KPG, Inc, was identified as the best selection of six engineering firms considered from the Municipal Research and Services Center (MRSC) consultant roster. The 2013 Program will provide design services for seven locations, four which are residential and three that are contributing portions of existing projects. The City has a total of $200,000 budgeted for construction management services for the 2013 Overlay Program including $100,000 remaining from the 2012 Program. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 5 CONSENT AGENDA. B. Ranking /Rating for Residential Street Improvements As information only, a brief background and history were provided for Committee discussion on the City's Residential Street Rating Program. This was a planned follow -up from a budget work session in which Councilmembers expressed a desire to have an annual program for prioritizing and considering residential improvements such as streets and sidewalks as currently exists for the Annual Overlay and Repair Program and the Annual Small Drainage Program. After discussion and review, the Committee requested the full document entitled "Pedestrian Improvements by Formula — A Process," that was used for residential street rating, be distributed to each Committee Member. As well, they suggested that the detail on the Residential Improvements CIP page reflect information on projects that are residential in nature but have been moved or incorporated into larger projects in order to accurate reflected improvements being made. Overall, Committtee Members were concerned that the street improvements rating list required updating, but would like this item to come back to the Committee for additional discussion after there has been an opportunity to review the residential street rating study. The Committee would also like to see a detailed list of what is include in residential improvements (i.e.: curb, gutter, sidewalks, etc.) as well as an estimated cost per linear foot for such impovements. Committee Members agreed, with no dissent, that 53'd Avenue South is the highest residential street priority. INFORMATION ONLY. RETURN TO COMMITTEE AT A LATER DATE FOR ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION. III. SCATBd The Committee reviewed the SCATBd attachments. INFORMATION ONLY. 2 Transportation Committee June 6, 1994 4. Residenti:,1 Street Priority Two issues were discussed under this item, though staff had grouped them together. The first was a ped path plan for the 1995 year, and the second was to choose which residential street to design this year for construction next year. This second item had been put into the budget as an undesignated residential street. In 1991 staff had rated all the residential streets by priority based on things like street pavement width, parking, shoulder width, accidents, vehicle traffic, pedestrian usage, improvement costs per foot, and special issues. If a street got a ped path were moved down to the bottom of the list. Citizen calls have been tallied to drive up the priority of some streets. The top candidates for ped paths now are Interurban from 58th to 144th; 54th from Slade Way to S 166th; 44th Ave. S; and perhaps the north part of Macadam Ave. S. Staff's top street improvement candidates are 42nd and S. 124th for the new community center; 32nd and S. 135th near the Cascade School renovation; and S. 164th in McMicken. Allan thought S. 164th needed a ped path, but maybe not the whole street improvement, since it has low traffic and pedestrian volumes. He also thought it could be a problem to underground, since some of the residents on the street are in Sea Tac, not Tukwila. He also wasn't thrilled about stRff's plans to put in curbs, gutters, sidewalks and undergrounding on the north side of S. 124th near the new center, as well as on the west side and on 42nd Ave. S. He thought maybe overlaying the north side would be adequate. Joe was interested in a street in Ryan Way, since we haven't done anything there. Allan asked about the low rating for S. 144th between Pac Highway and Military. In the end, the committee asked for separate rating sheets for ped paths and street improvements, and for options on the S. 124th project and S.164th project. Reschedule. 3 3 C i t y of T u k w i l a I N F O R M A T I O N PAPER Department: PUBLIC WORKS Date: October 24, 1994 Subject: Residential Streets BACKGROUND For Mayor's Office Only Mayor City Admin Filed X For Your Information Response Requested Immediate Response Residential Street ratings were presented to Transportation Committee on June 6 with the recommendation for the next streets being considered for improvement to be: 32 Ave S, S 124 St, 42 Ave S, and S 164 St. 32nd, 124th, and 42nd are streets in residential areas with adjacent public development (schools and community center). Committee requested dividing the list to show ped path and street improvement candidates and to consider one side improvements on 124th and 42nd. Residential streets were discussed as an added item 8 at the July 5 meeting with S 130 St being asked for further study. The two lists, one showing streets as if no ped path had been added for a full street improvement selection and the second list for ped paths were presented. S 130 St, 37 Ave S, 34 Ave S, and 53 Ave S were requested for further evaluation (updating counts and information) and to return. The count and field information was updated and returned to the September 19 meeting. The recommended full improvement list included the three affected by the school and city development (32nd and 124th -42nd) as well as five prioritized at the meeting from the list of the highest 14. The five prioritized at the meeting were: 32 (132 -137) 53 Ave S (137 -144) combined with Macadam (144 -150) 37 Ave S (Pac Hwy -144) S 140 St (Military -Pac Hwy) with 34 Ave S (140 -144) for 1995 Ped Path and additional ped path candidates requested for October consideration. ACTION TAKEN Further evaluation has been made and additional ped paths would be: 34 Ave S (140 -130) based on rating and requests S 122 St (42 -51) based on rating and requests 33 Ave S (140 -144) based on rating and requests. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended to: 1. authorize PS &E for 32nd at Cascade School for 1995 construction, 2. authorize a design report for 53 Ave S (137 -144) and Macadam (144 -150) for 1996 construction, 3. authorize Ped Path PS &E for 34 Ave S and S 122 St for 1995 construction with the Overlay program. 4 M E M O R A N D U M To: Robin Tischmak, Assistant Engineer From: Ron Cameron, City Engineer Subject: Street Ratings Project No. 90 -RS02 Date: February 4, 1990 We discussed the Annexed Street Friday, the goal of rating of streets by August (for budget) and that TC will want it before then for TIP if possible. This memo notes some of the key elements discussed. All unimproved "residential streets" need to be rated; two categories: "residential - local access" and "residential collector arterial" (RLA and RCA). Probably one of Mark's spreadsheets can be modified, feel free to call Mark and go visit him for questions on his work if Brian or I can't give the direction or info you need. First is to create the spreadsheet inventory and a large map showing (colored) the unimproved streets. Then, start building the inventory, identifying lengths of logical (improvement project) segments and right -of -way widths. Then, a series of decision criteria - listed across the spreadsheet in columns for: average pavement width /segment average traveled way width /segment average traffic volume (ADT) /segment - pavement life expectancy (years) combine using Shorty and our counters. three year accident total /segment traffic speeds - estimated and radar studies ped volumes - I'll give you the rating method average shoulder width (widest side) /segment columns to "check" for issues: drainage, banks, rockeries, grade, dead end, cul de sac, etc. priority rating using algorithm ped path cost /foot c /g /sw cost per foot underground cost /foot (let's try to have full inventory cost for UG by May for TC /UC Council UG policy consideration, actually, this could be first number out of the inventory in February total costs by column) Specific spreadsheet cell data will be needed for reviews and our putting recommendation together; final 1992 priority will be based on safety rating, ped path costs, and street improvement costs. I'll get the rating system algorithim for you. Choosing which projects will be driven by ped safety considerations first, street next (ped safety problems exceed vehicle problems on residential streets). 5 ANNEXED STREET RATING SHEET 1.) SIMPLE 2.) MODRATE 3.) DIFFICULT 4.) VERY DIFFICULT 11 -15 -94 File: P: \Projects \st_old2.wks STREET 1 50 PL S 2 42 AVE S C>3 42 AVE S 4 S 130 PL 5 MACADAM RD 6 40 AVE S 7 42 AVE S 8 51 AVE S 9 42 AVE S 10 42 AVE S 11 53 AVE S 12 MACADAM RD 13 51 AVE S 14 42 AVE S 15 S 150 ST 16 50 PL S 17 37 AVE S 18 S 115 ST 19 MACADAM RD 20 MACADAM RD 21 MACADAM RD 22 42 AVE S 23 34 AVE S 24 56 AVE S 25 S 144 ST 26 S 144 ST 27 S 140 ST 28 S 146 ST 29 35 AVE S 30 S 135 ST 31 44 AVE S 32 32 AVE S 33 S 158 ST 34 S 146 ST 35 52 AVE S 36 S 130 ST 37 S 122 ST 38 S 139 ST 39 S 150 ST 40 S 152 ST 41 54 AVE S 42 53 AVE S 43 S 164 ST 44 S 126 ST FROM S 130 PL S 156 ST S 139 ST 50 PL S S 144 ST E MARGINAL WY 40 AVE S S 144 ST S 150 ST S 144 ST S 137 ST 42 AVE S S 151 ST S 154 ST 42 AVE S S 124 ST S 144 ST E. MARGINAL WY S 144 ST S 147 ST S 138 ST S 124 ST S 140 ST S 130 PL MILTRY RD 51 AVE S MILTRY RD MILTRY RD S 137 ST MILTRY RD S 116 ST S 137 ST MILTRY RD PAC HWY S S 137 ST PAC HWY S 42 AVE S PAC HWY S PAC HWY S PAC HWY S SLADE WY 52 AVE S 51 AVE S 34 AVE S NO ROCKERY, FAIRLY FLAT 51ST AVE S, SOME ROCKERY, GRADE DIF 56 PLACE 8, ROCKERIES, RETAINING WA 51ST AND MACADAM RD, -LARGE RETAININ STREET IMPROVEMENT RATINGS TO FD #1 LIMITS S 158 ST S 144 ST 57 AVE S S 138 ST 42 AVE S S 139 ST S 151 ST S 154 ST S 150 ST S 144 ST 48 AVE S S 154 ST S 156 ST END OF ROAD S 130 PL PAC HWY S 42 AVE S S 147 ST S 150 ST 48 AVE S INTERURBAN S 130 ST INTERURBAN PAC HWY S 53 AVE S PAC HWY S PAC HWY S S 132 ST 37 AVE S S 122 ST S 130 ST 42 AVE S 46 AVE S 53 AVE S 42 AVE S 51 PL S 42 AVE S 42 AVE S 42 AVE S S 166 ST S 137 ST 42 AVE S E MARGINAL WY -OF -WAY AV TR AV AV AVG LENGTH PV WY SH SH ADT PED AV PRIORITY (FT) WD WD RT LT VOL V /DY SP RATING 1,150 24 22 2 2 7,500 50 45 120.89 788 20 20 4 4 5,000 10 45 109.27 1,675 22 20 3 4 5,000 500 35 88.93 2,140 18 18 0 1 2,500 5 35 81.37 2,285 28 20 5 3 4,000 200 35 74.83 1,820 22 20 3 4 7,000 50 35 72.29 1,650 22 20 3 4 7,000 50 35 70.56 2,371 20 20 4 2 2,500 10 40 64.31 1,020 20 20 4 4 5,000 100 35 60.07 2,035 20 20 4 5 5,000 100 35 58.13 2,097 24 20 5 3 1,691 200 35 54.76 1,750 28 22 3 4 3,000 100 35 52.49 890 20 20 4 0 2,500 10 40 51.86 788 20 20 4 6 5,000 10 45 51.12 2,132 18 18 3 2 1,555 500 25 48.06 1,275 24 20 6 6 7,500 50 35 45.53 3,665 24 20 3 4 1,500 100 30 45.31 1,625 20 20 5 5 2,500 50 35 41.57 1,000 22 20 4 6 3,000 500 40 41.14 900 28 20 5 3 2,250 100 35 37.63 600 28 20 5 3 2,500 200 35 37.08 1,340 24 22 5 4 8,582 50 25 33.69 3,310 24 20 3 3 750 100 25 30.65 1,785 22 22 4 4 2,764 50 25 29.58 1,615 34 20 6 5 6,790 250 25 29.30 650 32 20 8 4 7,000 1000 35 28.27 2,360 24 20 5 4 1,950 500 25 26.78 1,085 22 20 5 4 1,375 500 30 26.10 1,675 22 20 2 2 500 50 25 23.65 2,080 24 20 4 4 1,000 50 25 23.65 2,250 24 22 0 0 250 50 25 23.58 1,665 30 10 0 5 1,000 1000 20 23.55 1,665 20 20 5 4 700 50 30 21.71 1,623 20 20 6 4 1,000 200 25 20.77 620 20 20 4 4 3,000 100 20 20.50 2,130 28 20 4 6 1,797 100 25 20.22 2,020 28 22 2 3 500 20 25 20.16 625 24 20 5 2 1,000 2 30 19.80 1,437 18 18 3 4 700 5 25 19.40 1,688 20 20 2 4 750 5 25 19.37 1,236 17 15 0 0 350 5 20 19.18 435 18 18 2 3 1,500 100 20 18.65 2,050 20 20 5 5 850 25 25 18.59 1,345 24 20 5 5 250 50 35 18.51 BRIDGE OVER I -5 1998 CIP PROJECT 1997 CIP PROJECT UNDER I -5; BETWEEN RIVER & RR STEEP SIDE SLOPES; EXPENSIVE 1998 CIP PROJECT 1997 CIP PROJECT STEEP SIDE SLOPES; EXPENSIVE DESIGNED; UNDER CONSTRUCTION DESIGNED; UNDER CONSTRUCTION * CANDIDATE STEEP SIDE SLOPES; EXPENSIVE STEEP SIDE SLOPES; EXPENSIVE 1998 CIP PROJECT * CANDIDATE CODIGA FARM; FEW HOMES * CANDIDATE FEW HOMES; NEXT TO RIVER * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE STEEP SIDE SLOPES; EXPENSIVE * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE BRIDGE OVER I -5 * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE NARROW ROAD NEXT TO I -5 * CANDIDATE * CANDIDATE; SOUTH SIDE SEATAC * CANDIDATE 6 All Citie- Are Affected, Regar_ less of Size or Location • All cities, regardless of size, identify infrastructure as a key to economic development. Good infrastructure shows confidence in our cities and signals the business community to invest in Washington. • Newly incorporated and annexed cities need major infrastructure investments to meet urban standards. • Larger economic centers need major infrastructure improvements to accommodate new economic growth, density, affordable housing, congestion relief, and freight mobility - requiring a level of investment that local resources alone cannot meet. • Smaller communities lack economies of scale, and often struggle to provide utility services at an affordable rate. • In a 2008 AWC State of the Cities research document, 65 percent of city officials indicate that state and federal mandates contribute to a city's need for sewer /waste water new construction and improvements. Mandates continu, to double and triple infrastructure costs L1971 i�State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) 1971 Shoreline Management Act (SMA) 1972 Clean Water Act (includes wetlands regulations) 1973 Endangered Species Act 1974 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) 1987 Clean Water Act Amendments - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permits (NPDES) 1990 Growth Management Act (GMA) 1990 NPDES Phase! 1995 Critical Areas 1996 SDWA Amendments 1998 ESA - Proposed listing for Chinook Salmon in Puget Sound basins 1999 NPDES Phase II • DOE issues Phase 11 permits Water Use Efficiency Rule Rigel ';L and l a t ne st ip Climate Action Team St ategies • Trans: ortation • Green Builcin • El'A • B:.ynnd Waste 2007 Typical City Infra:, Costs Tod:; City streets are more than, pavement. t $250,000/ mile + ADA compliance tio) . ,00,000 /mile Street - $6,000,000 /mile Ir $1,000,000 /mile $3 0,000/ Landscaping 11 1.1.11(11 ELECTRICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS $4,500,000 /mile RIGHT OF WAY $700,000 /mile + Phase II monitoring A $450,000 Illumination/ Signalization • Lliti 1 I1,1 1131-r-4 1A14, LLEC 1`RICAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS Purchase R.O.W. $1,300,000 /mile Plus ongoing maintenance, preservation and operating costs. 3 7 City of Tukwila CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM for 2014 - 2019 RESIDENTIAL STREETS 103 Fund CIP **Other After Six Page # PROJECT TITLE 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TOTAL Sources Years 2 42nd Ave S Phase III 260 2,900 0 0 0 0 3,160 0 4,360 3 Cascade View Safe Routes to School 324 0 0 0 0 0 324 324 839 4 Thorndyke Safe Routes to School 650 14 0 0 0 0 664 409 0 5 Small Roadway & Safety Improvements 110 70 0 0 0 0 180 0 240 6 53rd Ave S (S 137th St - S 144th St) 0 251 600 600 0 0 1,451 1,000 0 7 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Residential Street Improvements 0 0 0 0 750 750 1,500 0 2,310 Grand Total 1,344 3,235 600 600 750 750 7,279 1,733 7,749 ** Denotes other funding sources, grants, or mitigation. Changes from 2013 to 2014 CIP: Addition: 6 53rd Ave S (S 137th St - S 144th St), separate project from page 8, Residential Improvements 2014 - 2019 Capital Improvement Program 1 11/18/2013 8 CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY 2014 to 2019 PROJECT: 40 -42 Ave South (S 160 St - S 131 PL) Project No. 99410303 DESCRIPTION: Design and construct street improvements, drainage, sidewalks, bike facilities, and driveway adjustments. JUSTIFICATION: Provide pedestrian and vehicle safety, drainage, and neighborhood revitalization. STATUS: Phase III (S /C Blvd (154th) - S 160 St), Design began in 2012, construction in 2015. Project No. 99410303 Phase I (S /C Blvd (154) - S 144 St) $3,796, Completed. Project No. 90 -RW15 Phase II (S 144 St - S 139 St) $1,850, Completed. Project No. 94 -RS02 Phase IV (S 139 St - S 131 PI) $1m in beyond. Project No. 99410301 MAINT. IMPACT: Reduce pavement, shoulder, and drainage work. COMMENT: Only Phase III is shown in active years. Project includes Surface Water's Gilliam Creek 42nd Ave S Culvert project for $660k (pg. 89) and is part of the Walk & Roll Plan. Council directed no undergrounding for Phase III on 10/8/12. FINANCIAL Through Estimated (in $000's) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 BEYOND TOTAL EXPENSES Phase IV Design 120 270 260 650 Land (R /W) 100 100 Const . Mgmt. 400 560 960 Construction 2,400 3,800 6,200 TOTAL EXPENSES 120 270 260 2,900 0 0 0 0 4,360 7,910 FUND SOURCES Awarded Grant 0 Proposed Grant 0 Mitigation Actual 0 Mitigation Expected 0 City Oper. Revenue 120 270 260 2,900 0 0 0 0 4,360 7,910 TOTAL SOURCES 120 270 260 2,900 0 0 0 0 4,360 7,910 2014 - 2019 Capital Improvement Program 2 9 CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY 2014 to 2019 PROJECT: Cascade View Safe Routes to School Project No. 91210301 Construct an off- street, paved shared use path, sidewalks, and a traffic circle at 33rd Ave S and S 140th St. DESCRIPTION: This route was identified in the Walking Audit prepared for the Cascade View school zone. S 140th St is one of the high priority missing sidewalk areas prioritized as part of the Walk and Roll Plan. JUSTIFICATION: Enhance safety for students walking to Cascade View Elementary School and encourage transportation choices for Cascade View neighborhood residents. STATUS: Phase I is construction of an off - street, paved shared use path between S 137th St and S 140th St. Phase II includes a traffic circle at 33rd Ave S/S 140th St. Also includes sidewalks on the east side of 33rd Ave S between S 140th St & S 144th St and the north side of S 140th St between Military Rd S and 34th Ave S. MAINT. IMPACT: New trail, traffic circle, and sidewalks will need to be maintained. COMMENT: WSDOT Safe Routes to School State grant for $428K for Phase I. Funding for Phase II in beyond wit be part of a future grant application. FINANCIAL Through Estimated in $000's 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 BEYOND TOTAL EXPENSES Phase II Design 55 29 183 267 Land (R/W) 78 78 Const . Mgmt. 45 126 171 Construction 250 530 780 TOTAL EXPENSES 0 133 324 0 0 0 0 0 839 1,296 FUND SOURCES Awarded Grant 133 295 428 School District Grant Portion 29 29 Proposed Grant 750 750 Mitigation Expected 0 City Oper. Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 89 TOTAL SOURCES 0 133 324 0 0 0 0 0 839 1,296 2014 - 2019 Capital Improvement Program 3 10 CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY 2014 to 2019 PROJECT: Thorndyke Safe Routes to School Project No. 91210302 DESCRIPTION: Construction of roadway improvements and new sidewalk on the north side of S 150th St between Tukwila International Blvd and 42nd Ave S. Also a new crosswalk on S 150th St in front of Thorndyke Elementary. JUSTIFICATION: Enhance safety for students walking and biking to Thorndyke Elementary and encourages alternate transportation choices. STATUS: This route is one of the high priority missing sidewalk areas prioritized as part of Walk and Roll Plan. MAINT. IMPACT: Negligible. WSDOT Safe Routes to School Federal grant for $457K. Surface water on S 150th St is also programmed COMMENT: for $270k (see SDP on page 82) and $100k from Overlay & Repair for a total project cost of $1.082m. Education, enforcement, and encouragement are included as part of the Safe Routes to School grant requirements. FINANCIAL Through Estimated in $000's 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 BEYOND TOTAL EXPENSES Design 48 28 14 90 Land (R/W) 0 Const . Mgmt. 55 55 Construction 567 567 TOTAL EXPENSES 0 48 650 14 0 0 0 0 0 712 FUND SOURCES Awarded Grant 48 395 14 457 Proposed Grant 0 Mitigation Actual 0 Mitigation Expected 0 City Oper. Revenue 0 0 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 255 TOTAL SOURCES 0 48 650 14 0 0 0 0 0 712 2014 - 2019 Capital Improvement Program 4 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY 2014 to 2019 PROJECT: 53rd Ave S (S 137th St - S 144th St) Project No. 99110301 DESCRIPTION: Design and construct urban residential street improvements that include curb, gutter, sidewalk, and illumination. Street portion will coordinate with Water ($1.1m) and Surface Water ($1.5m) CIP projects ($4m total). JUSTIFICATION: Provide pedestrian and vehicle safety, drainage, and neighborhood revitalization. STATUS: New project for 2014 - 2019 CIP. MAINT. IMPACT: Reduce pavement, shoulder, and drainage work. COMMENT: Transportation Improvement Board grant is proposed with Streets, Water, and Surface Water as match. FINANCIAL Through Estimated in $000's) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 BEYOND TOTAL EXPENSES Design 251 251 Land (R/W) 0 Const. Mgmt. 100 100 200 Construction 500 500 1,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 0 0 0 251 600 600 0 0 0 1,451 FUND SOURCES Awarded Grant 0 Proposed Grant 500 500 1,000 Mitigation Actual 0 Mitigation Expected 0 City Oper. Revenue 0 0 0 251 100 100 0 0 0 451 TOTAL SOURCES 0 0 0 251 600 600 0 0 0 1,451 2014 - 2019 Capital Improvement Program 6 12 CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY 2014 to 2019 PROJECT: Residential Street Improvements Project No. Varies DESCRIPTION: Select, design and construct residential streets and /or water and /or sewer projects. JUSTIFICATION: Neighborhood revitalization by improving residential streets. Program is project oriented to specific residential streets that require quick design and construction. STATUS: 37th Ave S (135- Tuk Intl Blvd) and S 132nd St (Tuk Intl Blvd - Military Road) are future candidates. MAINT. IMPACT: Reduce maintenance. COMMENT: Residential improvements have included 42nd Ave S (see page 2), S 150th St improvements have been included in Thorndyke Safe Routes to School (page 4), and 53rd Ave S (page 6). FINANCIAL Through Estimated in $000's 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 BEYOND TOTAL EXPENSES Design 750 750 700 2,200 Land (R/W) 0 Const. Mgmt. 210 210 Construction 1,400 1,400 TOTAL EXPENSES 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 750 2,310 3,810 FUND SOURCES Awarded Grant 0 Proposed Grant 0 Motor Vehicle Tax 0 Mitigation Expected 0 City Oper. Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 750 2,310 3,810 TOTAL SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 750 2,310 3,810 2014 - 2019 Capital Improvement Program 8 13 14 SOUTH COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION BOARD (SCATBd) January 21, 2014 MEETING SUMMARY Members Councilmember Marcie Palmer (Chair) Councilmember Bill Peloza (Vice- Chair) Councilmember Wayne Snoey Councilmember Carol Benson Mayor Dave Hill Councilmember Dana Ralph Stacy Trussler Jeannie Burbidge Councilmember Stacia Jenkins Chris Arkills Kelly McGourty Councilmember Jeanette Burrage Councilmember Barry Ladenburg Peter Stackpole Mayor Leanne Guier Commissioner Don Meyer City of Renton City of Auburn City of Covington City of Black Diamond (Alternate) City of Algona City of Kent (Alternate) WSDOT City of Federal Way City of Normandy Park King County (Alternate) PSRC City of Des Moines City of SeaTac Pierce Transit City of Pacific Port of Tacoma L Open Meeting After opening comments and introductions the Board approved the meeting summary for the December 17, 2013 SCATBd meeting. H. Reports, Communications and Citizen Comments Vice -Chair Bill Peloza passed out a resolution adopted by the National League of Cities supporting ports maintenance and modernization for economic development in cities and towns. Wayne Snoey mentioned the rail comment letter that SCATBd sent to WSDOT, and said cities should be concerned about oil movement via trains and of its potential impacts to south King County cities. Chris Arkills briefed the Board on King County's proposed Transportation Benefit District (TBD). He said the TBD ordinance proposal calls for creation of a King County TBD that would ask voters to approve for a $60 vehicle fee, which would raise an estimated $80 million a year, and one -tenth of a cent sales tax that would expire after 10 years, which would raise an estimated $50 million a year. Under the proposal, 60 percent of the revenue, about $80 million would be distributed to Metro Transit for bus service, with 40 percent about $50 million to fund roads and transportation needs in cities and in unincorporated King County, with allocations based on population. The King County Council is currently deliberating on the specific TBD proposal to place on the ballot, and if approved would most probably be put on the April ballot. 15 Kelly McGourty briefed the Board on the PSRC's launch of the 2014 project selection process. She said the PSRC Boards and committees were currently reviewing the project selection policies and procedures, and the call for project is expected to occur in mid - February. There is about $200 million of highway funds and $486 million available for transit. Ms. McGourty said that the preservation and non - motorized set -a -side was still included in the 2014 project selection process. She reminded the Board of its role in choosing 12 King County area projects to advance to the regional competition. III. Briefing on WSDOT's I- 405 /SR 167 Funding & Phasing Report Kim Henry and Denis Cieri, WSDOT, briefed the Board on the I- 405 /SR 167 Funding and Phasing Report. The Washington State Legislature authorized the Phase 1 construction of express toll lanes between Bellevue and Lynnwood, and this phase is currently under construction. That same legislation also required the development of the I- 405 /SR 167 Funding and Phasing report, which WSDOT developed in consultation with a committee consisting of local and state elected officials from the I -405 and SR 167 corridor, known as the I- 405 /SR 167 Executive Advisory Group (EAG). The EAG recommendation was to allow 3+ carpools free during peak and 2+ carpools free during the off -peak. The EAG felt that this recommendation has the least impact on commuters, transit, financial needs; and maintains speeds of 45 mph or better. The EAG also recommended a medium traditional funding option for the remaining phases including one lane between NE 6th Street and SR 167, the I- 405 /SR 167 Direct Connector, the I -405 - 112th Ave. SE to I -90 auxiliary lanes, and the NE 6th Street Extension. The medium funding option relies on gas tax or other traditional revenues for $960 million of the $1.175 billion needed. The remaining $215 million would come from toll revenues (toll- backed general obligation bonds or pay -as- you -go). IV. 2014 SCATBd Legislative Message /Priority Projects The Board discussed the development of its 2014 legislative message. The Board recommended keeping the same legislative message that was developed for the 2013 State Legislature. Since there is a number of extra 2013 SCATBd Legislative Message brochures left over from last year, the Board also decided not to print a 2014 brochure. Other Attendees: Maryann Zukowski, Normandy Park Tamie Deady, Black Diamond Doug McIntyre, Boeing Tom Gut, SeaTac Maiya Andrews, Burien Rick Perez, Federal Way Brandon Carver, Des Moines Denise Cieri, WSDOT Kim Henry, WSDOT Ed Conyers, WSDOT Amy Danberg, WSDOT 16 SOUTH COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION BOARD (SCATBd) MEETING Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:00 — 11:00 a.m. SeaTac City Hall 4800 South 188th Street SeaTac AGENDA 1. Open Meeting • Introductions • Approve summary of January 21, 2014 SCATBd Meeting (Attachment A) Action 9:00 a.m. 2. Reports, Communications and Citizen Requests to Comment • Chair or Vice Chair • Participant Updates from RTC and Other Regional Committees • Public Comment Reports and Discussion 9:05 a.m. 3. Renton Ave Project Update — Jim Seitz, Renton Report and Discussion 9:30 a.m. 4. PSRC Transportation 2040 Update Public Comment — Robin Mayhew Report and Discussion 10:00 a.m. 5. 2014 Regional Project Selection Process — Paul Takamine Report and Discussion 10:30 a.m. 17