Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 6065 - Hittle Residence - Foundationcr APF'HOVED FOR / ISSUANCE BY: T / )0.4u2 } - BUILDING OFFICIAL know the same whether specified the provisions to sign DATE: 574 - I to be true and correct. All provisions herein or not. The granting of of any other state or local laws for and obtain this building permit. I hereby certify that I have read a ' ' xamined this permit and of law and ordinances governing this work will be complied with, this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel regulating construction or the performance or work. I am authorized ■ �,/�.Q�_ DATE: 6 SIGNATURE: ^ l 6 -- `hr) PRINT NAME: ()AN (.f N I Tr L..- COMPANY: PROPERTY OWNER Craiq Hittle PHONE 243-4173 ADDRESS 4631 South 138th Street, Tukwila, WA ZIP 98168 CONTRACTOR Self PHONE ADDRESS ZIP WA. ST. CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE # EXP. DATE ARCHITECT N/A PHONE ADDRESS ZIP TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V -N UBC EDITION (year) SETBACKS: N _ $ _ E — W — FIRE PROTECTION: O S•rinkiers 0 Detectors ix UT PERMITS REC�UIRED? ®Yes 0No (through Public Works) , ZONING: R -1 BAR /LAND USE CONDITIONSEyes 0 N 5 I 0 -( i 0 4 -Q2 -90 PLAN CHECK FEE CONDITIONS (other than those noted on or attached to permit/plans): 4.50 TiliWt7f - (b ,� ..�. CCC.' LOAD USE D • a 'A BUILDING PERMIT FEE _ , 35,00 88,00 g' 7148 1 5 I 0 -( i 0 4 -Q2 -90 PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING SURCHARGE 4.50 TiliWt7f - (b ENERGY SURCHARGE CCC.' LOAD SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD OTHER: OCC. LOAD TOTAL SQUARE FEET TOTAL OCC. LOAD TOTAL - 227,50 USE COOL COMPLIANCF FLOOR WI SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD SQUARE FEET CCC.' LOAD SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD SQUARE OCC. LOAD TOTAL SQUARE FEET TOTAL OCC. LOAD TOTAL, CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development - Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 (206) 433 -1849 I BUILDING PERMIT NO. DATE ISSUED: (00 (05 - 1(c) 90 BUILDING PERMIT (POST WITH INSPE‘, i ION CARD AND PLANS IN A CONSPICUOUS LOCATION) PLAN CHECK #90 - 152 FEES .,0 L:1it1' ' 2 PAOJFC T INF OFIMA l ION SI UI 4637 S 138 St U " 12,000.00 V PROJECT NAME/TENANT ASSESSOR ACCOUNT # Hittle, Craiq 322920 -0047 TYPE OF Li New Building C7 Addition Li Tenant Improvement (commercial) Li Demolition (building) U Grading/Fill WORK: 0 Rack Storage 0 Reroof 0 Remodel (residential) ® Other Foundation DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE: Construct foundation for relocated house. This permit shall become null and void if the work is not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance, or if the work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days from the last inspection. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NO. Nipt DATE ISSUED: OW 1 Lll PERMIT NO. CONTACTED Ck DATE READY DATE NOTIFIED _ 1 1 r ^ W 9 O (init.) PERMIT EXPIRES 2nd NOTIFI TION „ r 'J ( ! BY: (snit.) BY: (init.) _/rit AMOUNT OWING f - 1 J • 3RD NOTIFICATION PLAN CHECK NUMBER 90 I (R INSTRUCTIONS TO STAFF • Contacts with applicants or requests for information should be summarized in writing by staff so that any time the status of the project may be ascertained. • Plan corrections shall be completed and approved prior to sending on to the next department. • Any conditions or requirements for the permit shall be noted on the plans or summarized concisely in the form of a formal letter or memo, which will be attached to the permit. • Please fill out your section of the tracking chart completely. Where information requested is not applicable, so note by using "N /A ". BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE/OCCUPANCY INFORMATION (to be filled out by Plan Checker) TOTAL :; SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD SQUARE OCC. FEET LOAD SQUARE OCC. FEET LOAD SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD TOTAL SQUARE FEET TOTAL OCCU- PANCY LOAD DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW "X" in box Indicates which departments need to review the project. PARTM BUILDING - initial review -1- c) )( FIRE C.hed k 11���rr�nfi R. PLANNING (rob) PUBLIC WORKS O OTHER BUILDING - final review BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TRACKING PROJECT NAME SITE ADDRESS 4(o L3% t TE : REVIEW COMPLETED >APPROVEi ROUTED %/9 INIT :.�K V- rto INIT: INIT: INIT: ( u qt © INIT: \< 1\/\ ZONING: f2 CONSULTANT: Date Sent - IR PROTECTION: Sprin FIRE DEPT. LETTER DATED: REFERENCE FILE NOS.: MINIMUM SETBACKS: UTILITY PERMITS REQUIRED? Yes (l No PUBLIC WORKS LETTER DATED: — —' 0 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: UIRENIE N- lera S- SUITE NO. 'VIE ate Approved - Detectors BAR/LAND USE CONDITIONS? fYes J1 O t N/A INSPECTOR: UBC EDITION (year): SITE ADDRESS SUITE # 31 . ) 3e 1 T"t- . 5 E E-7 VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION - $ / 02 1 aoo , on PROJECT NAME/TENANT eRY\L 6- a 1 / ( L-- E-- ASSESSOR ACCOUNT # 3 9 -on�7 X 2 0 TYPE OF U New Building Li Addition Li Tenant Improvement (comma cial) Demolition (building) WORK: O Rack Storage 0 Reroof 0 Remodel (residential) A. Other' FDU A\ D T /Oh) DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE: �1 - R0CUIJ FOR DA in .1 R R. i- 0 �? F/�O (olJ5T T FO BUILDING USE (office, warehouse, etc.)) 5 I/ c,- 1- Fi4yi'1 (LY ieE s t ,off Ai c-5._ NATURE OF BUSINESS: WILL THERE BE A CHANGE IN USE? No Yes IF YES, EXPLAIN: SQUARE FOOTAGE - Building:A., 9 loo Tenant Space: Area of Construction: WILL THERE BE STORAGE OR USE OF FLAMMABLE, COMBUSTIBLE OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN THE BUILDING? 0 No 0 Yes IF YES, EXPLAIN: PROPERTY OWNER Ckp1 el / - 'L E. PHONE ,2 3_44' c ADDRESS ` 3 I . / 7-t7 cSZ�� "T TLJ K IA ) IL A zi p q gl g 'CONTRACTOR SCL F PHONE ADDRESS ZIP WA. ST. CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE # EXP. DATE ARCHITECT /tic' Vi PHONE ADDRESS ZIP ;:::a HER( '::GERTI F'<TiI�iAT I Il'I .R <J!il.. : ::: wXAMINEa: THIS APP TiQ1 A !!I : :: CORRECT �N�l:>�::x�a:.hc� .fnR �� �� >,l Mgi(Sf THE sAME:rC? :8 BUILDING OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT SIGNATURE 74 tfc DAT PRINT NAME � R1; I ( H I 7 ---- 7 - 6 _, E PHONE a4 3 .. I.. 7,3 ADDRESS 4/6, 2 ( a 1 TH CITY /ZIP - r7Kw ILA 98 (0 (CONTACT PERSON cR41 6- H / r- L F PHONED q 2, _' 1 n, 3 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development - Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 (206) 433 -1849 APPLICATION MUST QE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY DATE APPLICATION ACCEPTED - 90 BUILDItG PERMIT APPLICATION FEES (for staff use only) DESCRIPTION BUILDING PERMIT FEE PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING SURCHARGE ENERGY SURCHARGE OTHER: AMOUNT TOTAL - RCPT # 11 DATE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL In order to ensure that your application Is accepted for plan review, please make sure to fill out the application completely and follow the plan submittal checklist on the reverse side of this form. Handouts are available at the Building counter which provide more detailed information on application and plan submittal requirements. Application and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. VALUATION OF CONSTRUCTION Valuation for new construction and additions are calculated by the Department of community Development prior to application submittal. Contact the Permit Coordinator at 433 - 1851 prior to submitting application. In all cases, a valuation amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be reviewed and is subject to possible revision by the Building Division to comply with current fee schedules. BUILDING OWNER I AUTHORIZED AGENT If the applicant is other than the owner, registered architectengineer, or contractor licensed by the State of Washington, a notarized letter from the property owner authorizing the agent to submit this permit application and obtain the permit will be required as part of this submittal. EXPIRATION OF PLAN REVIEW Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitations. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the applicant as defined in Section 304(d) of the Uniform Building Code (current edition). No application shall be extended more than once. If you have any questions about our process or plan submittal requirements, please contact the Department of Community Development Building Division at 433-1849. DATE APPLICATION EXPIRES 10- Q-9c 031301111 COMMERCIAL NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS /ADDITIONS Completed building permit application (one for each structure) C Assessor Account Number Two sets (2) of the following: Specifications C Structural calculations stamped by a Washington State licensed . engineer Soak report stamped by a Washington State licensed engineer Topographical survey Energy calculations stamped by a Washingten State licensed engineer or architect • Legal description C Working drawings, stamped by a Washington State licensed anchilect,.which include: • • Site plan .. • Architectural drawings • Structural drawings • Mechanical drawings • Elevations. • • Civil drawings • •pl Completed utility permit application (one for entire C Six (8) sets of civil drawings NOTE :. See utMy permit application and checklist for* apedk udfrty submittal requirements. RACK STORAGE Completed building permit application C Assessor Account Number Two (2) sets of plans, which include: E Building floor plan showing: • Entire space where racks will be • Exit doors • Dimensions of all aisles Tenant spy floor plan showing rack ibralp tayout, exits, .. E Twa•sets:(2).of warWng drawings, vufiich indu Sew c+Iru► • Foundation plan : . • Rear Roof plan • • Buifditq•etevatione (all views) • Bu ldYq cross - section . SSuc*iraf framing plan ;.:: Cl W shington Energy Code data ••• Connitleled uWftr permit application Cl Six (6) sets of site plans showing utilities r SIBMITTAL CHECK:1ST NOTE: lnckiaie dimensions racks (height wWtft and Isnpt ), aisles and aim taws on plan Structural calculations stamped by a Washington State licensed engine (radii storage 8` and over) RESIDENTIAL NEW IlNOLEFAWLY DWELLINGS/ADDITIONS C Completed Guiding permit application (one for each strudute C 1 Lepd description C Assessor Account Number NOTE: Building site plan and utility site plan may be combined See utility permit application and checklist for specific submittal :requirements. Additional topographical and soils infamatlon may be requintdd unique ills conditions, COMMERCIAL TENANT IMPROVEMENTS Completed building permit application (one for each structure or tenant) E Assessor Account Number Two (2) sets of construction plans, which include: C Sit plan • Location of tenant space • Existing and proposed parking Overall building plan • location • Use of atlaoent (common wall) tenant • Overall dimensions of building or square footage Floor plan of proposed tenant space • Tenant space plan with use of each room labelled. • Exit doors, egress patterns. • New walls, existing wall, and wails to be demolished. C Construction details • Cross sections showing wall construction and method of attachment for floor and ceiling. C Structural calculations stamped by a Washington State licensed engineer may be required if structural work is to be done (2 sets) NOTE: If any utility worklab :be done, submit separate utility permit application and plans REROOF Completed building permit application (one for each structure) • Assessor Account Number Narrative describing existing roof, material being removed, and material being installed NOTE: A certification letter is required prior to final inspection and sign- off of the psrndt ANTENNA/SATEW1'E • DISHES • Complet d bdidings permit application Assessor Account Number • Two (2) Sets of plans, which include Sits Plan (showing buiksirp and locati •of. an tenna/satellite dish) Detrils nannalsatellfe dish and method of attachment Sttucturtt a1t:uYtlon i rod stamped by a Washington State Licensed engineer may be re u RESIDENT REMODE C Complet b uilding permit application (one for each structure) As sessor Account Number Two (2) s ett of w orking drawings, whichInclude: Site Plan • u plan Fl pt Root Fou n dati on plan • Buildin g slsvtions (all views) • • Building cross- aaatb t • Si NOTE: N any utility MKark Is b be done Proticfb utflUy permit appl ication and plans must be submipad REROOFS C Completed buiWng permit application (one for each structure) C Assessor Account Number C Narrative dssatbing existing roof, material being removed, and material being insteNad :: NOTE: A certification ht1Mr k r quind prior to linal inspection and sign- oil of di. panriL PROJECT: / �� - - - c°-- PERMIT NO. / 6 5 SITE ADDRESS: l{ -- -7-- -, > / . � j '' 2 DATE CALLED: /6 r C / TYPE OF INSPECTION: - � 6-'YLrL -(_ �. .+ DATE WANTED: / 7 —'7 / . � SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: `" REQUESTER: L e ____._ - - - -- -- -- __ _____ .. PHONE NO.: c? _7,q:/ 7 INSPECTION RESULTS /COMMENTS: r .- - • • � _.--i--(1,-, DATE: e 7— 9/ I NSPECTOR: / CITY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development • Building Division Phone: (206) 431-3670 INSPECTION RECORD 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 PROJECT: 1 l p , CY'0 1 PERMIT NO. CP O(QJ SITE ADDRESS: 3 3 3< DATE CALLED: 5— 13 ct I TYPE OF INSPECTION: Y103 DATE WANTED: S —/ (0 —q SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: REQUESTER: Cr 01 PHONE NO.: ( D1,{ 'J- -- q 1-13 INSPECTION RESULTS /COMMENTS: !/, /- r2,(",-7, , 1.��* INSPECTOR:. ,,,< < 1, 4 4 Pz-, DATE: ( 5_ // -- 9y CITY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Division Phone: (206) 431 -3670 INSPECTION RECORD 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 PROJECT: 'j4 t catttei-) PERMIT NO. /; e)&' SITE ADDRESS: a6-7-7) 7 ,.. JA 5/', DATE CALLED: C ---(,, — c TYPE OF INSPECTION: Nall/ii? . 7 -- z,,22 -- e,,,, — te),ii_r DATE WANTED: 5 — 7- 9/ (1 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: REQUESTER: PHONE NO.: ( -9-4/3 e- 1 73 INSPECTION RESULTS/COMMENTS: 6 e973 ,.. t INSPECTOR: by„... , 4 DATE: , 5 CITY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Division Phone: (206) 431-3670 INSPECTIO4 RECORD 74 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 PROJECT: 0,41,/tAi tt PERMIT NO. SITE ADDRESS: Igo 3 S l DATE CALLED: 4.- a t4 -1/ TYPE OF INSPECTION: diuo 4 0 I) r10 DATE WANTED: if -- --D-S -- / " SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: REQUESTER: PHONE NO.: r -9 ( /-3 - 21 / 73 INSPECTION RESULTS/COMMENTS: - .■ 0 _ c4 DATE: 4 7- 7 27<— / INSPECTOR: tez N'41111■61' INSPECTION RECORD CITY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Division Phone: (206) 431-3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 Adk(‘ INSPECTION RECORD CITY OF 'TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Dh4sion Phone: (206) 431-3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 PERMIT NO. 1.PD & S PROJECT: (9t 0 1 SITE ADDRESS: i .2 ) DATE CALLED: LI-- I..-q/ TYPE OF INSPECTION: . At AA,4 I, (r) DATE WANTED: /4.-- 1q SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: REQUESTER: PHONE NO.: p....43 —A-/-/ 73 INSPECTION RESULTS/COMMENTS: A /- L N / - 7 1- , ,9, A ey ,--.a. i 2 / -4,2_ .,...., d _-----./' Th%A•V • 77 -.:-/ 1111fIPECTIIR! 4 ..-, sel_.-1' .221,-, Adk(‘ INSPECTION RECORD CITY OF 'TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Dh4sion Phone: (206) 431-3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 'ype of Inspection -- jdnkivioy wo.,(1 ?Yot.1441 te Address 4k.9 e 1-77g-6- equestor TiVr pedal Instructions nspection Results/Comments: nspec tor CITY OF TUKWILA Building Department 6300 Soul( iter Boulevard Tukwila, 98188 (206) 431-3670 . yn INSPECTION RECORD PERMIT # 0 Go Date 3 — — ° C? t-Q!e.- // 4 /).73 Date 3 - Date Wanted 1 2 I p.m Project ( 41' Phone # II" PROJECT: ( )! � fry ) •1 - 1 • IC''ff ., PERMIT NO. (oO&2 SITE ADDRESS: LJ t r p -: ' E ! �_' e 1-1.. " DATE CALLED: / — /O TYPE OF INSPECTION: t7a,., c-- i ', 'I y T ` ; DATE WANTED: /-- 1/ — °) / (- SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: ( REQUESTER: e//MA /)' {— /.Q, 4" P �i. s) w,42 C oa c•�c_ Noa -Tr-em c,) Qasc1 _ PHONE NO.: 24 — `H 7 J INSPECTION RESULTS /COMMENTS: l (11' C ; ,•.��� .k..0 _0- �°�t rw-) v v.s--JC,IN ) /Y1 C. I CI. L . INSPECTOR: ;"- � e " J-e_ -- DATE: / -- /,_C) / CITY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Division Phone: (206) 431 -3670 INSPECTION` RECORD 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 Inspection Results /Comments: Inspector CITY OF TUKWILA Buildi�� oartment 6300 So ,.,enter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 r,z/1-ze) INSPECTION RECORD PERMIT # t' OnrCa Date 0 cc.4 Date Wanted S l v a.m . Project Phone �- Type of Inspection Sid° Site Address (Q 3 7 Requestor ; (/'C1 1 Special Instructions � Date / / --AS,— ... Requestor Special Instructions Inspection Results/Comments: Inspector CITY OF TUKWILA Building rrtment 6300 Sout ter Boulevard Tukwila, A 981813 (206) 431-3670 Type of Inspection 0-1/14 ,,,, Project ,iDate Want a.m. -,)9-11--- Site Address INSPECTION RECORD PERMIT # 0 C - 2,7 Date Date 2-cir—eeD 91;,:7: CITY OF TUKWILA Buildinrnoartment 6300 So Inter Boulevard Tukwila, wrk 98188 (206) 431-3670 VIV Inspection Results/Comments: Inspector INSPECTION RECORD p PERMIT # uLe 41 -9 0 Date Type of Inspection mg iA _ Date Wan - 0_&m. p.1 Site Address 3 6 • Project CA/V0 ) Requestor CA(C(A t: Phone # Special Instructions Date ype of Inspection r-D-KnAikarkolr..., ite Address 14(6 ' equestor it/putpy 41ki pecial Instructions nspection Results/Comments: CITY OF TUKWILA Buildirartment 6300 So .nter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431-3670 [nspector 4 jg!:•-, -„ 7 9' INSPECTION RECORD PERMIT # co Date q- r qo Date Wanted Project 011/ Phone # 2 3 L 4,113 Date 7.- CITY TUKWILA Buil Department 6300 ,thcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431-3670 Type of Inspection •nl I I - 'CLC Site Address (.rt Requestor (`). co 9 Special Instructions Inspection Results/Comments: Inspector INSPECt!ON RECORD PERMIT # (r) s Date & -- 9 - - 0 Date Wanted a.m./0 Project 0„Nriir„ T11111 Phone # ,4 1 7 Date ( 0 ? CITY Of Buil Department 6300 chcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431-3670 Type of Inspection r7 Site Address ,( 75;1 / Requestor , La, Ce_.,e Special Instructions Inspection Results/Comments: Inspector INSPEC RECORD PERMIT # COO Q C - I - AO Date Wante Project Phone # Date Date Inspector CITT TUKWILA Buil Department 6300 .chcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431-3670 Type of Inspection .-- )c51)K1(.1. Site Address 4h3j 5 136 Requestor _ Special Instructions Inspection Results/Comments: INSPECtON RECORD PERMIT # 6066 Date 4 4 (c. Date Wanted 7 2— a.m. .m. Project Mel 0 _ Phone # 2..n-4f7,? Data I2c, 9 6 DATE PROJECT NAME ADDRESS CONTACT PERSON TYPE OF REVISION: SHEET NUMBER(S) CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 * * REVISION SUBMITTAL * * - 7-6 -V 6, "37 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER flit A ; t wf PERMIT NUMBER CO < 5 (If previously issued) PLAN CHECK NUMBER ...... • � L -0°c4y fi/b.-' li / . "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. SUBMITTED TO: , g/c7 - 1 tct I r 56 LC13:_k in■P3 L c;3-r-Fit PHONE 1 A A) 2-dj —A Ito RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FE.6 2 6 • t PERMIT CENTER DATE J ' v ( - l O PROJECT NAME (i/2/} 1 (,- /477 ADDRESS ¥6) 3 7 So /3R CONTACT PERSON (2,/t ax n? ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER fi © pti PERMIT NUMBER D (O 6 PLAN CHECK NUMBER go-15a TYPE OF REVISIONS CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 -4 * *REVISION SUBMITTAL * (If previously issued) • AAA.; A • M1 ;1A/t ice- c9-71 46-cka, avrA Poaa X30 .00 IQ - 31' qQ RaceiPtd*- 05 ( IBREET-IRINIMIt RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA OCT 2 1 1990 PERMIT CENTER PHONE 0 ( -7 1 l 7 3 OCI 4)5 VII . NOON "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date rdi*'i'd &ns . SUBMITTED TO: )K4?fl 1\)-21 son DATE / O PROJECT NAME ( � CONTACT PERSON SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 * *REVISION SUBMITTAL ** ADDRESS q(9 3 7 V (307 . A )1AL,4I • ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER JVIl E PERMIT NUMBER 1 V l - b q $ —70 (I f previously issued) PLAN CHECK NUMBER q 0:35 TYPE OF REVISION a,f�' / / , Er RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA OCT 2 4 1990 PERMIT CENTER PHONE o. `/ 3 - `0 7 SHEET NUMBER(S) "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revision, date revisions. Changes to grading permit proposal: Permit # M - 098 - 90 1. Eliminate grading of areas A and B due no need. 2. Eliminate backfill of area C due grading of area D will bring grade down to level of area D. 3. Changes eliminate placement of fill under this permit. .. o f? GIsJ01L Description of grading in excess of what is normally required for building a foundation. Foundation building permit applied for simultaneously. Approximate calculation of amount of material. Area A - Excavate further from footprint than would normally be required to provide an area for a "cat" to pull relocated house into place. To be backfilled. 10' x 4' rectangular area, 6' depth = 240 cu ft Areas B and C - Excavate further from footprint than would normally be required to provide a path for relocated house to enter site. To be partially backfilled with slight change in contour. Both areas are near right triangular shape of similar size. Depth cut decreased as width of area increases. 20' x 16' x 16' triangle, 0' - 5' depth = 200 cu ft ea Area D - Change of contour to reduce steepness of slope between 116' and 108' contour, and to remove existing undesirable fill. Approx. 200 sq ft area, 0' - 6' depth = 600 cu ft Area F - Cut grade for parking area. Approx. 200 sq ft area, 0' - 4' depth = 400 cu ft TOTAL 1640 cu ft, Approx. 61 cubic yards Areas shown by A B etc. on site plan. Included for further reference are geotechnical report and foundation plan. Description of grading in excess of what is normally required for building a foundation. Foundation building permit applied for simultaneously. Approximate calculation of amount of material. Area C - Excavate further from footprint than would normally be required to provide a path for relocated house to enter site. Area is near right triangular shape. Depth of cut decreased as width of area increases. 20' x 16' x 16' triangle, 0' - 5' depth = 200 cu ft ea Area D - Change of contour to reduce steepness of slope between 116' and 108' contour, and to remove existing undesirable fill. Approx. 200 sq ft area, 0' - 6' depth = 600 cu ft Area F Cut grade for parking area. Approx. 200 sq ft area, 0' - 4' depth = 400 cu ft TOTAL 1640 cu ft, Approx. 61 cubic yards Areas shown by A 8 etc. on site plan. Included for further reference are geotechnical report and foundation plan. DATE (x'027- 9c0 CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 * *REVISION SUBMITTAL ** PROJECT NAME n Q41 4- / 77 C. ADDRESS ¥6 ` 5 0 / 3R 77 CONTACT PERSON ( hl (- !l ! l ��- ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER IUD AJE 57 PERMIT NUMBER (.,t_,A S -0? / " ?O' (I f previously issued) PLAN CHECK NUMBER O - O 3' -• l� RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA OCT 241990 PERMIT CENTER TYPE OF REVISION: PHONE 0 - y17 SHEET NUMBER(S) "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. SUBMITTED TO: Pu C/ I N or KJ October 23, 1990 Department of Public Works City of Tukwila RE: Permit # CCAS - 097 - 90 Site Address 4637 So. 138th Street Request for a variance relating to curb cut permit I request a variance of the requirement that prohibits the grade of the driveway to start within the right of way. I ask to be allowed to start a 15 % grade 10 feet into the right of way which would be approximately 6 feet from the roadway. My reasons are as follows. 1. Safety - Installing a level driveway from the road to the property line would create an abrupt rise above the road since an existing storm drain manhole rises over one foot above the level of the roadway. Anyone pulling onto the shoulder or drifting due to taking the corner to fast would hit that abrupt rise and risk damage and /or diminished control of their vehicle. I suspect that the manhole and basin itself would also eventually become damage. 2. Drainage - I would replace the solid cover of the existing manhole with a grate that would allow runoff from the parking area to drain into the basin. This would also enhance safety in that it would reduce the amount of drainage onto the roadway, and thus reduce the amount of ice that accumulates on the roadway in freezing weather. 4. Conformity - There are a number of driveways in the area that start at the roadway and have rises as much as three feet within the right of way. 5. Site Grade - My request would eliminate the need to cut into the roadway shoulder since it would follow the existing contour of the shoulder. It would also provide for a slightly lesser slope and a slightly greater distance between the house and the new rockery. I trust I have shown that my request would be very practical, and provide for a driveway that would be more appropriate for the site. It would be far superior to many of the driveways that exist in this area, and improve safety on what is a somewhat treacherous stretch of road. Thank -you for your consideration. Sincerely, n o)1/4) Craig Hittle 4631 So. 138th Street Tukwila, WA 98168 243 -4173 DATE CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 * *REVISION SUBMITTAL * 7- 3 0 -�90 CITY:;;" JUL '3 0 1.9O f'EF be r CENTER R PROJECT NAME / I I T - E ADDRESS 6 3 7 / 38 CONTACT PERSON PERSON e..4 I C. ii r E 1 2-E PHONE 22 - L/r / 3 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER PERMIT NUMBER (00 6 5 (If previously issued) PLAN CHECK NUMBER TYPE OF REVISIONS 1 5 1 ' s7E P TJo WA) OA) 4- pbR T1 o � r©a7 / A) G-- - 1/E/ 0F' AX -R fc - /q0 �A} A E.V ti l A D PEP o �`'74 E Le) IA) Eie -b R o F 4 Pie r,o Al OF 77 fir 154-56", nv or TUPP L n Ap ROVED SHEET NUMBER(S) C7�— - r r iviSION "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and datirrovitions. SUBMITTED TOs L 3 0 1990 * *REVISION SUBMITTAL ** CITY OF TUKWILA APPROVED JUL 23 1990 PROJECT NAME (•s- A T TT (�,� PI ill ntNG DIVA 10N DATE 7-to-cm ADDRESS PERMIT NUMBER (P d 6 CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 • 7 l CONTACT PERSON ( / U' 07 / 77 L E PHONE y/ 73 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER CAR I IS 141 Tr L E PLAN CHECK NUMBER ! D ^ /5 TYPE OF REVISIONt GOo R °, /' (If previously issued) rzth 6 fizaki • - ./ i)L _ L k _i .- • •.a 1. 1 I I l Q t JJ Q I r G , 1 . S . E . C .. h9 dM ./le - ., 0111) 51:w • SHEET NUMBER(S) lU� "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. 4 SUBMITTED TO: ` JINX, CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 * *REVISION SUBMITTAL ** DATE c ° ; ■ - 9 0 ` PROJECT NAME 1 f 4 I t4- 17 Z.L, ADDRESS l! CONTACT PERSON C/,/ /, 4]c- �f 7T PHONE g4 _ 1 7 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER (IAA_ 4 I 17T7 PERMIT NUMBER C ' ( ' (If previously issued) PLAN CHECK NUMBER 90- I TYPE OF REVISION: (/1 &j4 of li)6t9; L IS T 2 F ed/1 1 OW 11.,0L4 i SHEET NUMBER(S) 'f-;1 I- N "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions anddate revisions. SUBMITTED TO: ptrf3 Lf C ty tce , (t2.- Ut , • e rr•:) CITY Of JUN 2 0 1990 t t_( '.I CU: i ER derstand that the Plan CI►ocl: ;t,3t;rin',lk nr:: suhlect to errors anti omtt Enid opo r)vctl of plans dogs not author Fie the viole :tion ;,i ,►r•:',' adopted coda or ordinance. Flc:cor;►t of cor tractor's copy of approved plans ncknowledc;t: :l By Date ' _��! Permit No. —6Q • i • CC . 1-1 - " - Pt kr ic- �..._ WI PAR ..- . E 1 4 -cab 4� ��1 L pp k $� - I 0 ti r • )1/4.6 3" DATE CO "' C'J ` 'T D CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 .* *REVISION SUBMITTAL ** PROJECT NAME ( fQ A I Ls f1 I (1 , ADDRESS `T( 5e, / 3e 77' ma y( CONTACT PERSON ( x/41 (- if / 7[2- -- PHONE �13 " `'i I / 7 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER �N/`7 / S- i/I l ! LE PERMIT NUMBER (6 (If previously issued) PLAN CHECK NUMBER go TYPE OF REVISION: rkt.41,,LA • le. tt'ffif0_:0 61 49-(4 4 SUBMITTED TO: rEJ\) AJ EL- 56, ) SHEET NUMBER (S) t54 7r f G Ih /U "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and data revisions. (206) 433 -1851 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 * *REVISION SUBMITTAL ** DATE - g3 - qo 4./.L PROJECT NAME. , HI - 7711-1 - / e_,R A I C-- ADDRESS 3 7 / S 7 CONTACT PERSON Z4 / & Hi 71-- E PHONE 21 /3- L 7 1 /73 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER 4 4- /z /j I / L -r. PERMIT NUMBER PLAN CHECK NUMBER SUBMITTED TO: TYPE OF REVISION: e,,, 0 Ta L/ 'Ef ,912 (If previously issued) CITYpFTpUKWI L 4,.. R O V MAY 231990 BUILDING DIVISION SHEET NUMBER(S) "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. CITY OF TUKWILA MAY 2 3 1990 PERMIT CENTER CITY OF TUKWILA 6209 SOUTIJCENTER BOULEVARD. TUKWILA. I 98188 Plan Check #90 -152: "little, Craig 4637 8 138 St PHONE a 1200 433.1800 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS APPLY TO,AND PART OF THE APPROVED PLANS UNDER TUKWILA BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER �(((O 1. No changes will be made to the plane unless approved by the Architect and the Tukwila Building Division. 2. Plumbing permit shall be obtained through the King County Health Department and plumbing will be inspected by that agency, including all gas piping (296- 4732). 3. Electrical permit shall be obtained through the Washington State Division of Labor and Industries and all electrical work will be inspected by that agency (872- 6363). 4. All mechanical work shall be under separate permit through the City of Tukwila. 5. All permits, inspection records, and approved plans shall be posted at the job site prior to the start of any construction. 6. Any exposed insulations backing material to have Flame Spread Rating of 25 or less, and material shall bear identification showing the fire performance rating thereof. 7. Subgrade preparation including drainage, excavation, compaction, and fill requirements shall conform strictly with recommendations given in the soils report prior to final inspection. 8. All construction to be done in conformance with approved plans and requirements of the Uniform Building Code (1988 Edition), Uniform Mechanical Code (1988 Edition), Washiggton State Energy Code (1989 Edition), and Washington State Regulations for Barrier Free Facility (1989 Edition). 9. Notify the City of Tukwila Building Division prior to placing any concrete. This procedure is in addition to any requirements for special inspection. 10. All wood to remain in placed concrete shall be treated wood. Gary l.. I'anInsen, Mayor !little, Craig Page 2 11. Validity of Permit. The issuance of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for , or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. No permit presuming to give authority or violate or cancel the provisions of this code shall be valid. "X" REQUIRED INSPECTIONS PHONE DATE APPROVED INSPECT. INITIALS DATES) CORRECTION NOTICE ISSUED X 1 Footings 433 -1849 x 2 Foundation 433 -1849 x 3 Slab and/or Slab Insulation 433 -1849 4 Shear Wall Nailing 433 -1849 5 Roof Sheathing Nailing 433 -1849 6 Masonry Chimney 433 -1849 X 7 Framing 433 -1849 X 8 Insulation 433 -1849 9 Suspended Ceiling 433 -1849 10 Wall Board Fastening 433 -1849 11 12 13 14 FIRE FINAL Insp: 575 -4404 15 PLANNING FINAL 433 -1849 16 PUBLIC WORKS FINAL 433 -0179 x 17 BUILDING FINAL 433-1849 /INSPECTOR COMMENT SECTION ON REVERSE) CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development - Building 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 (206) 433 -1849 BUILDNG PERMIT INSPECTION RECORD (Post with Building Permit In conspicuous place) 8 St Division SUITE NO.: BUILDING ( 0 0 (0_5 PERMIT NO. DATE ISSUED: PROJECT: Hittle, Craig SITE ADDRESS: 4637 S 13 CALL FOR INSPECTIONS AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS All approved plans and permits shall be maintained available on the site in the same location. 1. FOOTING - When survey stakes and forms are set and rebar is tied in place. 2. FOUNDATION - When forms and rebar are in place. 3. SLAB - If structural slab or if underslab insulation is required. 4. SHEARWALL NAILING - Prior to cover. 5. ROOF SHEATHING NAILING - Prior to cover. 6. MASONRY CHIMNEY - Approximately midpoint. 7. FRAMING - After rough -in inspections such as mechanical, plumbing, gas piping, electrical and fire stopping is in place. 8. INSULATION - After framing approval, but before installation of wallboard. Baffles must be installed to keep attic ventilation points clear. 9. SUSPENDED CEILING - Fasten diffusers, lights and seismic bracing. 10. WALL BOARD FASTENING - Prior to taping (see UBC Chap. 47 and Table 47G). 11. 12. 13. 14. FINAL FIRE INSPECTION - Contact Fire Department for their requirements. 15. FINAL PLANNING INSPECTION - Contact Planning Department for their requirements. 16. FINAL PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTION - Contact Public Works Department for their requirements. 17. FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION - When all work, corrections, reports and other inspections are complete. OTHER AGENCIES: Plumbing (including gas piping) — King County Health Department — 296 -4732 Electrical — Washington State Department of Labor and Industries — 872 -6363 A preconstruction meeting with the Building Inspector may be scheduled prior to starting the job by contacting the Department of Community Development, Building Division at 433 -1849. Although not required, a meeting of this type can often eliminate problems, delays and misunderstandings as the project progresses. a,zw.o 'X' REQUIRED INSPECTIONS 1 Footings 2 Foundation 3 Slab andfor Slab Insulation 4 Shear Wall Nailing 5 Rool Sheathing Nailing 5 Masonry Chimney 7 Framing 8 Insulation 9 Suspended Ceiling 10 Wall Board Fastening 11 12 13 14 FIRE FINAL Imp: 15 PLANNING FINAL _...15 PUBLIC WORKS FINAL 17 BUILDING FINAL PLAN CHECK NUMBER ` c(o_ I5 2 PROJECT: l `c -T L ) CR Al 6 TOD WOLLOWlNO COMMENTS APPLY TO AND SECOMt PART OR toil A►PAOvEO ►LANK wale TUKWILA BUILDING PCIIMIT MUMIMN . Er ie thole! sill be aide to the plans unless approved by the Architect and the Tutuila Building Division. Pushing perslt shall be Obtained through the King County wealth Oepartment and pleading will be inspected by that agency• including all gas piping 1216■4732). 4E) Electrical perslt shalt be obtained through the Washington State Division if labor and Industries and ail electrical work will be inspected by that agency 1072. 63631. All mechanical work City of Tukwila. e r e All permits, inspection records, and approved plans shall be posted at the Job sits prior to the start of any Construction. O a Men special Inspection is required either the owner, architect or engineer shall notify the Tukwila Building Division of appointsent of the inspection agencies prior to the first building Inspection. Copies el all special inspectloa reports shall be subsitted to the Building Division in • tlaely sinner. Reports shall contain address, project ease and persit •umber of the project being inspected. O Ail structural concrete to be special inspected MSec. 306, USC)• O Alt structural welding to be done by M•A.I.o. certified welder and special Inspected (Bee. 300, USC). . 0 All bigh•strengtb bolting to be special Inspected (Sec. 306, MI. t0 Any see coiling grid and light fixture Installation is required is beet lateral bracing regutresnts for Seismic Zone 3. tl Partition walls attached to ceiling grid lust be laterally braced if over eight 101 test in length. l2 Readily accessible access is reef counted equipsent Is required. 13 engine/reef truss drawings and calculations shalt be on site and avatlebls to the building inspector for inspection purposes. Deteaents shall bear the seal and atgnstere of a Washington State eleis /seal Engineer. boy exposed insulations backing gantlet to have flame Spread Sating el 25 or less• and material shall bear identification shooing the firs performance rating thereof. , Subgrads preparatios including drainage, eacavatisa, cospectten, and fill requiresents shall confers strictly with recommendations gives is the soils report prior to fteal isepeetton 'A;Aaulteg mien oeve edit ..t. is A statement Bros the reefing contractor verifying fire retarhaney • of root will bo required prior to final inspection Isle attached precedvrei. shall be under separate perslt through the All construction to be dome In conformance with approved plans sad requirements of the Uniform building Code 11111 Edition), Uniform Mechanical Cede 11911 Editlonl, Mashigatos Moto Energy Code 11919 edition., and Washington Bias Requlsties. for Barrier Free tatility 11981 'dittos). It All lead preparatlee establishments must have king County Health Department sign -off prior to opening er doing any lost processtng. Arrangements for final Health Department Inspection should to made by calling King County Health Oepartsent, 296 -4717, at least three sorties days prier to desire inspection date. Oe wort requiring Health Oepart.ent approval, it is the contractor's responsibility to have a set of plans approved by that agency on the job site. t9 Wire retardant treated wood shall have a Class spread of not over 25. All .atericls shall bear identification showing the fire performance rating thereof. Such identification shall be issued by as approved agency herring a service for inspection at the factory. lair Netlly the City of Tukwila Building Divlsiss otter to placing any cemcretc. This procedure is to addition to any requirements for specie' Inspection. tl All spray applied fireproofing as required by O.S.C. Standard No. 43.0, shall be special inspected. Er bil mood to resale is plated concrete shall be treated seed. 23 Ali structural saseery shall by Special inspected per Y.I.C. Settles 300 tat P. er validity if Permit. the issuance of a perslt er epirevel of . plane, fpeciltoatlons and computations shall mot be construed to be a perslt for , er en approval of. any vlelatism el any of the previsions of this cede er of any other ordinance. •f the aurisdistlen. Ne welt 'musing to give authority or violate or .an.ml &ha um....... wa .... ..... �_ ..u. The undersigned owner and developer of real property located at g4Aj S n . 13AT l 5 T TU K1,5 1 1.. i; and more specifically described in Exhibit A httached hereto, hereby agrees, pursuant to the requirements of Tukwila Ordinance No.'s 1544 and 1550, that if the City of Tukwila will process the following applications: the development of the property described in Exhibit A will be subject to all of the Sensitive Areas Ordinance provisions as finally passed by the City Council even though those provisions may be more restrictive than any conditions or limitations imposed by or resulting from the processes described above. The Undersigned agree(s) that these processes will be continued solely at their risk and expense and that the result of the final Sensitive Area Ordinance may be to require extensive project modification and re- evaluation or recision of the above approvals. It is also understood and agreed that continuation of these processes does not mean that applications not pending on November 20, 1989, for this project, will be accepted or processed unless the City Council approves a petition therefor. The undersigned acknowledges that the covenants herein run with the land described in Exhibit A and that this document will be recorded with the King County Department of Records and Elections and that these covenants cannot be released without he written consent of the City of Tukwila. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this •a personally appeared before me , to me known to . e the ndiv dual descr d in and who executed this instrument, and acknowledged that ssigned the same as a free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. 3/15/90 Dated ry Agreement To Be Subject To A Sensitive Areas Ordinance ( ?_ a01r tary Public in and for the tate o Washington}, residing at z. 7C J M appo n ent expires Plan evew PROJECT 1 7 L. C R (a ADDRESS y � 3' s ` 3 8 " DATE Y'Oo1J©A, -r 1O7J TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION OCCUPANCY GROUP LOCATION ON PR OPERTY 3(.4 F4 as ' EE . — �b FT ' W -- yU 54 S BUILDING HT. / NO. STORIES SASerneuT "IL,FrYu.6H-r FLOOR AREA OCCUPANT LOAD EXITING REQUIREMENTS DETAILED REQUIREMENTS OCCUPANCY A TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. �� _C)j< CHAPTER 51 -10, W.A.0 CITY OF T UKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1'J A PART V, CHAPTER 23, U.B.C. .WI.S.E.C. NOW Mos Cord\'PL PLAN CHECK NUMBER c o -1 5 2. NOTES: Vou a r u RA nAl N )tiVD T prepared by: ,_(S/ 42-7)1, ! Plan Review PROJECT .► TT LE C R PrI L ADDRESS LI ( 31 S ( 3 b 5T DATE REQUIRE Sc Rect.F.lueD BY MZ, H 17"t 1.- / N - P8R5oti1 O 1.3 S t - r 'P L P ( L + MS� .245- 14I�� - GYat� N,;f-Fte - `e.Qe,ra Turn 1 1— f _ecrt:red 4 - ,-tc,(zs . F (Z ` N CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . prepared by: , PLANNING DIVISION R - i 1.2 PLAN CHECK NUMBER 9o- 152- EV\ o11S. March 16, 1990 Mr. Craig Hittle 4631 South 138th Street Tukwila, Washington 98168 Dear Mr. Hittle: You intend to relocate a home onto the vacant lot you own immediately east of your present home at the above address. You were informed by the City that a geotechnical investigation would be required as a condition of permit issuance. I was referred to you by another firm you had contacted. We discussed the requirement on February 22, and met on the lot March 4. Because of the suspected presence of fill on the lot and the significant slope, I recommended that you engage the service of a backhoe and have me return for purposes of digging test holes. You arranged for the backhoe to be present on March 12, at which time two test pits were dug. Prior to March 12, you had ground- staked the building location and had almost completed a plan to be submitted to the City. Though the immediate building area is flat, it appears that the flat area was created by cutting or cutting- and - filling on the side of a natural south -to -north slope. One test hole was positioned outside the building area to the north and one outside to the south; the more precise locations are expressed as distances from house corners on page three attached. It appears that the only natural soil type relevant to your project is a clay formation. The south side of the cut bench, to include the south corner of the house, was cut some two yards or more below natural grade; there gray clayey hardpan exists at the surface of the artificially created grade. At and beneath the slope in the vicinity of the north corner of the house, several feet thick of off -site fill has been dumped over weathered clayey soil, which grades increasingly stiff with depth. Probings indicate that the soil there would have a hardpan consistency at a depth of six to seven feet below original (natural) grade. The clayey hardpan has excellent load- bearing and slope - stability properties. The loose fill, on the other hand, is unsuitable for foundation support and has unfavorable slope characteristics. It will be necessary to found your house on the natural clayey soil and to minimize differential settlement, the entire foundation should bear on soil of uniform quality. Because the south part of the house will necessarily rest on hardpan, the north part should also be supported by hardpan, even though placing the north foundation on hardpan will require excavating an estimated four to five feet deeper than would be necessary to penetrate the fill. JAMES EATON, PE in GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES (206) 682 -6942 Box 126 • Hobart, WA 98025 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWIIA APR 0 2 1990 PERMIT CENTER . Mr. Craig Hittle Page Two March 16, 1990 Conventional spread footings are recommended for the southeast and southwest perimeters, and could also be used for the entire perimeter. Because of depth the bearing hardpan along all or parts of the northeast and northwest perimeters, you may wish to modify the footing as we discussed. "Ordinary" or code -sized footings typically bear at 2000 psf on the supporting soil. The hardpan is capable of supporting loads several times that great. Therefore, you could use 12- inch -wide footings; by also using a 12 -inch -wide stemwal, at least for the underground portion, there would be no need to form the modified foundation. Schematically, it would be as shown. Very trul ours, ■ ■` r4 c ■ \ L7 \ ` ' \'\ ■,... \ \\ -- a /2 n L--- You should not depend on any of the fill or any topsoil or questionable native soils for support of slabs or other incidental improvements. If you have a floor slab, I recommend that it be underlain by at least six inches of sand or gravel and by a plastic membrane. Footing drains should be installed at least one foot below the elevation of adjacent slabs or crawl spaces they are intended to serve. The pipe and drain rock should be shrouded in filtering fabric to prevent long -term siltation. Let me know if you have any questions about this or if you want me to inspect during excavation to verify compliance. Mr. Craig Hittle Page Three March 16', 1990 #1 10 northeast of north corner of proposed house 0' Dark brown loam fill containing rubble 2.6' - Mottled brown silt with clay (soft at 2.6' to very stiff at 6.5') 7.3' - Completed and backfilled March 12, 1990 No groundwater encountered #2 4' south of south corner of proposed house 0' - TEST PIT LOGS Blue -gray silty clay (hard, slightly fissured) Completed and backfilled March 12, 1990 No groundwater encountered TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL February 20, 1990 Tukwila City Hall 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers Regular Meeting MINUTES CALL TO ORDER Mayor VanDusen called the Regular Meeting of the Tukwila City Council to order and led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL JOE H. DUFFIE; DENNIS ROBERTSON, JOAN HERNANDEZ, Council President; CLARENCE MORIWAKI; ALLAN EKBERG, STEVE LAWRENCE, JOHN RANTS. OFFICIALS JOHN COLGROVE, City Attorney; MAXINE ANDERSON, City Clerk; RICK BEELER, Director, Department of Community Development; ROSS EARNST, Public Works Director; RON WALD 4ER, Chief of Police. CITIZEN COMMENTS Resident Anna Bernhardt asked for Council's opinion on the Cascade View annexation if those citizens vote not to accept the bonded indebtedness of the City. She stated that she objects to the annexation without the acceptance of indebtedness. Councilman Lawrence responded that the bonded indebtedness will be a separate ballot issue. The Cascade View residents may vote to become part of Tukwila but not to accept the bonded indebtedness. He stated that he is in favor of having the Cascade View area join Tukwila hopes the residents will vote to accept both issues. Attorney Colgrove clarified that if the bonded indebtedness issue does not pass, the Council will vote again and have the option to accept or reject the annexation. A.L. McDonald, 4246 So. 146th, stated that he had distributed an article in area mailboxes regarding recycling plastic containers from fast food restaurants and is interested in the City's future in recycling. Councilman Duffle commented that the Utilities Committee will be addressing this issue at their next meeting and invited Mr. McDonald to attend. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of Minutes: 2/05/90—Regular Meetings b. Approval of Vouchers General Fund $99,486.61 City Street 21,000.36 Arterial Street 1,228.55 Land Acq., Building, Dev. 131,474.67 Water Fund 5,099.96 Sewer Fund 68,657.86 Water/Sewer Construction 285,408.26 Foster Golf Course 1,808.34 Surface Water (412) 5,825.56 Equipment R: ;.431 i . , 7,432.38 Firemen's .Pei _967.48 TOTAL $628,390.03 MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY ROBERTSON, THAT THE CONSENT AGENDA BE APPROVED AS SUBMIT'T'ED.* Councilman Rants requested that item 5d be withdrawn and discussed under item 7b. *MOTION CARRIED. Regular Council Minutes February 20, 1990 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARINGS Appeal of Business License Denial - Dandy's, 14406 Pacific Hwy So. Mayor VanDusen outlined the procedures to be followed during the public hearings. He noted that the guidelines are printed on the back of the agendas. At 7:17 p.m. Mayor VanDusen opened the public hearing on the appeal of a business license denial for Dandy's, located at 14406 Pacific Highway South. The appellants were granted a continuance at the Regular Council meeting on February 5, 1990. Jack Burns, 500 - 108th Ave. NE, representing the applicants, Walt and Teresa Szafryk, distributed copies of a letter outlining their arguments. He stated that the Szafryk's purchased Dandy's in 1986 and have done extensive remodeling to the premises. They have a substantial investment in the business. Prior to annexation of the area in 1989, Dandy's was a lawful business in King County. Mr. Burns outlined reasons he feels the licensing committee's decision should be reversed: (1) The section of TMC5.08.040 that limits the location of a cabaret within 500 feet of a playground or park or any elementary or high school should be considered a zoning regulation; (2) The Szafryk's business is a legal nonconforming use by reason of TMC 18.70.040. The enforcement of Section 5.08.040 should be subject to the rules concerning nonconforming uses absent a provision which should require the payment of just compensation as a consequence of the inverse condemnation resulting from immediate termination of an existing use; (3) Regarding the licensing code, the Szafryks feel that the term "playground" must be understood to mean a public playground not a private playground as the backyard of an residence could be considered a playground; (4) Regarding Chapter 5.08, there is no substantial governmental interest which is served by restricting the location of a cabaret. The zoning code does not prohibit taverns, hotels, restaurants, or other places of public resort open for public food service from locating within 500 feet of a "playground ". It also does not prohibit places providing theatrical performances, exhibitions, shows, exhibition dances, dancing, vaudeville performances, or music from locating within 500 feet of a playground ". Mr. Burns presented photographs which showed the growth and fences that are located between the business and the private playground. There is a high six foot barbed wire fence around the property that creates a barrier and prevents anyone from going either direction; (5) Dance entertainment is protected by the free speech and press guarantees of the First Amendment. In conclusion, Mrs. Burns requested that the Council reconsider the Licensing Committee's recommendation to deny a business license to Dandy's. Chief of Police Ron Waldner stated that the Police Department conducted an investigation as per Tukwila Municipal Code to determine if the business complies with the City ordinances. At the completion of the police investigation, the Licensing Committee met, and based upon the findings of that investigation and in compliance with the City's ordinance 5.08.040 which states: "No cabaret license shall be granted to any person when such place of business is located within five hundred feet of any playgro . d or park, or any elementary or high school or.the grounds thereof', the license was denied. Chief Waldner stated that the measured distance from the business establishment to the playground is 288 feet. The playground belongs to a private development; however, it is a well established fenced play area for children with the appropriate equipment. The recommendation of the Licensing Committee was clear enforcement of the language of our existing ordinance. In response to Mr. Burns, Chief Waldner explained that the denial of the license was done under the cabaret. It had nothing to do with the adult cabaret which gets into a zoning issue. It is not uncommon for communities to identify businesses, whether cabaret or associated with alcohol abuse, to have restrictive rules as to their location. Regular Council Minutes February 20, 1990 Page 3 Public Hearing (can't) Rebuttal - Mr. Burns Citizen Comments They are normally restricted in terms of schools, parks, places where children gather, churches, and residential communities. It is also not uncommon to see language in ordinances of 500 feet or 1,000 feet. Councils do pass action to restrict certain businesses, not prohibit them from functioning, but restrict them in certain areas within the community where the concern about impacts, exposures, quality of life issues, whatever influence that location can have on those things such as children in play areas. Chief Waldner feels that the issue here is the enforcement of an ordinance that deals with a distance restriction. This is not a free speech issue. The City is not restricting this type of business. It is only exercising, as representatives of the citizens, the decision as to how close they want this type of business to be to kids, schools, residences, churches, and the like. In this case we have an application for a cabaret business that is also alcohol based. There is an applicable City ordinance that is in . violation if the business was to exist there; therefore, the recommendation by the Licensing Committee to deny the license. Councilman Lawrence asked if there had been any legal problems at the business when they were a part of King County prior to annexation to Tukwila. Chief Weidner responded that they had checked with King County and were told that the business complied with the appropriate laws and the restrictive laws associated with a liquor license. Councilman Lawrence requested information from King County be obtained regarding a playground provision in their ordinance. Attorney Colgrove commented that we need to find out the merit to the argument that this is a zoning regulation rather than a licensing regulation. According to the attorney, if this is a valid licensing regulation, it is not subject to the same grandfathering provisions that apply to zoning ordinances. He will research the matter. Council agreed with Councilman Robertson's recommendation that a rebuttal period and citizens' comments be heard tonight, and if both sides needed the public hearing to be continued, a rebuttal period be held at that time also. Mr. Burns clarified that Dandy's is located within 500 feet of a private playground. The question is what purpose does that regulation serve and is it archaic. The regulation prohibits any place that sells food and provides entertainment from being within 500 feet of a playground. The applicant's business does sell alcohol; however, if this were a McDonald's and they brought in a clown for entertainment, it would be prohibited because the business is within 500 feet of a private playground. With respect to the burden of proof Mr. Burns stated that his understanding of the law in cases where first amendment interests are concerned and there is a regulation that restricts those rights, the burden is on the governmental entity to prove the necessity for the regulation. Attorney Colgrove commented that this is not a first amendment case in terms of adult entertainment Rebuttal - Chief Waldner - • Chief Weidner observed that we are suddenly questioning the validity and constitutionality and first amendment right application of this ordinance. That is not the issue before us. The issue is whether Dandy's complies with the existing ordinance and whether the business is within 500 feet of any playground. Mr. Burns has not disputed that they are within 500 feet of an established, used playground. The business clearly does not comply with the ordinance. If there is a constitutional issue at all, it is for a court to take action on. Anna Bernhardt, resident, noted that quite often children play outside after 6 p.m. Regular Council Minutes February 20, 1990 Page 4 Public Hearing (con't) A.L. MacDonald, resident, commented that as a precinct committeeman, he has not had anyone voice their objections to the business. Mayor VanDusen read a letter from Clarence C. Carter, Jr. and Pam Carter, 4115 So. 139th Street, in which they request that Council deny granting a license to Dandy's. MOVED BY ROBERTSON, SECONDED BY HERNANDEZ, THAT THIS PUBLIC HEARING BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING.* Councilman Moriwaki stated that this is a licensing issue only. We are dealing with the appeal of a license. The issues addressed by Mr. Burns help to strengthen their arguments; however, they do not address the licensing issue per se. Councilman Duffle concurred with Councilman Moriwaki and moved to deny the motion. Councilman Rants noted that if there is an ordinance in effect, Council must uphold the ordinance. It is up to the legal system to prove the ordinance inaccurate. Councilman Robertson commented that he does not disagree with the fact that this is a licensing issue; however, he feels that continuing the hearing for two weeks will allow time for the City Attorney to research the topic and present his opinions. Before taking the steps to deny the license or grant the appeal, all issues should be covered adequately. Councilman Lawrence concurred and noted that several points were raised that the ordinance may not adequately address. Speaking against the motion, Councilman Ekberg stated that the issue before the Council is a legislative issue. Our commitment to the citizenry is to uphold the ordinance and its intent or do something to change the ordinance. Councilman Lawrence suggested that Council should look into whether the current ordinance addresses the issues that it appears to address on the surface. Noting that she is in agreement with the motion, Council President Hernandez commented that she would like to have as much information as possible prior to making a decision on the issue. Councilman Duffle requested a roll call vote on the motion. DUFFLE - NO ROBERTSON - YES HERNANDEZ - YES MORIWAKI - NO EKBERG - NO LAWRENCE - YES RANTS - YES *MOT AIN CA1.RIED: TLC PUBLIC IMARING IS COP.' ;'LNUED TO TIDE, NEXT REGULAR MEFITS ,'x, MOVED BY DUFFLE, SECONDED BY LAWRENCE, THAT THE CONTINUANCE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING BE MOVED TO MARCH 12, 1990. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor VanDusen clarified that the City Attorney will respond point by point to the items raised in Mr. Burns' letter and research the King County ordinance. Testimony will be allowed at the March 12 continuance. Mayor VanDusen closed the public hearing at 8:10 p.m. Regular Council Minutes February 20, 1990 Page 5 Request for Waiver of Ordinance #1544 - Jeff and Melodie Shaver Request for Waiver to Ordinance #1544 - Craig Hittle RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA APR 0 2 1990 PERMIT CENTER Jeff Shaver, 4437 So. 156th Street, addressed the Council on his request for a waiver to the moratorium so that a building permit may be processed. Mr. Shaver proposes to construct a single - family residence for his family's occupancy on a single family zoned lot. Prior to the purchase, the property was a double residential lot with a single family dwelling on it. A lot line adjustment was made creating the Shaver's property. The overlay map showing sensitive areas touches on a portion of the lot. The only type of sensitive area involved is the fact that there is a slope slightly larger that 15 percent. That area of the lot is an orchard which he intends to keep to stabilize the slope. Mr. Shaver plans to build a house on the flat, southern portion of the lot. Mr. Shaver commented that there is a hardship mvolved in that waiting until after the moratorium expired would delay both the development and the selling of their current residence approximately three months. The Shaver's are a single income family and to delay would create a financial hardship. MOVED BY LAWRENCE, SECONDED BY ROBERTSON, THAT THE WAIVER BE GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE PETITIONER FILING AN AGREEMENT TO CONFORM TO THE ADOPTED SENSITIVE AREAS ORDINANCE AND TO PROCESS ANY APPLICATION AT THE HIS OWN RISK AND EXPENSE.* Councilman Ekberg inquired about the timeframe of the project. Mr. Shaver responded that he expected to have an application in within a week. *MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. Craig Hittle, 4631 So. 138th Street, stated the subject property is located at 4637 So. 138th Street. Mr. Hittle stated that he had applied for a building permit for a foundation to move a home onto the lot last summer. The application process was near completion when the structure was purchased by another party. Consequently, he was required to withdraw his application. At this time, he plans to move a house onto a small plateau that rests on the property with one end on the slope side opening up as the basement part. He has obtained a site plan for the project and a curb cut permit. Construction would have to be in March in order for that permit to remain valid. There will be sli . t differences in the plan that had already been reviewed and accepted by the Building Department. The new plan calls for different dimensions of the structure and different positioning of the structure. The new plan calls for a smaller sized structure and positioning to require less excavation. Mr. Hittle feels that the new proposal would have less impact than the original proposal. Mr. Shaver has obtained a storm drain permit to improve and change the course of an existing storm drain that is currently on the property. The existing system is functioning properly; however, the improvement would call for replacing a major portion of it which would extend the life of the system and provide for additional catch basins. This plan also forthe et;iii;atk»i of a. steep and replacement with a driveway and parking ikrea that conforms with the existing code. In order for his other permits to remain in effect, Mr. Hittle states that he must move on this project by mid- March. He feels that the revisions he has made to the plan reduce the impact on the sensitivity of the area. Councilman Rants asked Mr. Hittle how he planned to handle the impervious area around the house. He noted that the wooded hillside is very steep and there is a lot of water on the road and across the road. Mr. Hittle replied that at the top of the th iveway area there is a catch basin. Water that comes of the roof of the house and through the downspouts will flow underground and feed into the storm sewer. Regular Caticicil Minutes February 20, 1990 Page 6 Waiver Request (con't) Craig Hittle City Clerk Maxine Anderson, read a message from Diane DeAno, resident and neighbor to Mr. Hittle, in which she stated she is in favor of Mr. Hittle's proposal. It is a well thought out plan and will improve the property. His plan calls for improvements to the storm drain and he is showing concern for the neighbors. Councilman Lawrence asked Rick Beeler if he was confident a plan could be developed for Mr. Hittle's property that would conform to an approved SAO in terms of the drainage capacity. Mr. Beeler responded that out of the ordinance may come some flexibility for daylight basement single family homes on hillsides. Mr. Hittle noted that Public Works had remarked that it was a very responsible plan. Councilman Lawrence asked Mr. Hittle that if the Council grants the waiver, he understands that it is his obligation to go back and make whatever changes are deemed at that time to be necessary to conform to the ordinance. Mr. Hittle responded that before he applied for a permit, he would have to review what that might involve. He would not want to get into a position that he would put a house there and then have to tear it down. He would have to check to see what risks are involved before he would go ahead with the project. He would not go ahead and put a house there and then have the project. Department tell he him had to remove it. Councilman Lawrence commented that the hillside is steep and is known for having water problems. The eventual ordinance will address the stability for a house and how the water is handled. Referencing the staff report, Councilman Ekberg commented that the report states that the Public Works Department has already approved storm drain and curb cut plans prior to withdrawal of the building permit. The storm drain permit will expire in March of 1990. He mquired if that provides Mr. Hittle the opportunity to go ahead and put the storm drain system in even though he doesn't have a building permit. Mr. Hittle commented that he would not do so because the storm drain is capitalized into the entire project. He would not make the improvements without being able to go ahead with the project. Councilman Ekberg stated that it was his understanding that Mr. Hittle is grandfathered with the storm drain permit. Therefore, no matter what the moratorium effects regarding storm drains for that site, as long as he is grandfathered with the existing storm drain system he has in, which was allowed prior to the moratorium, there is nothing the moratorium can do to affect that storm drain. Ross Earnst indicated that Councilman Ekberg was correct regarding the storm drain. It is possible that if we require special geotechnical studies because of the slope, it is possible that before he got a building permit, he would have to do those geotechni:�.1 studies. Although it probably wouldn't alter the storm drain, it might require Mr. Hittle to put in some additional work to stabilize the slope before the house could go on it. In response to Councilman Duffle's question as to whether he would be will to do additional work to conform to the adopted SAO, Mr. Hittle responded that he didn't know. If he were asked to tear down his house, he would not be willing to do that. If he were asked to provide additional support, such as drainage for a particular area of the property, he would be willing to do it. Regular Council Meeting February 20, 1990 Page 7 Waiver Request (con't1 Craig Hittle Request for Waiver of Ordinance #1544 - Mike and Christi Easter NEW BUSINESS South King County Transportation Benefit District MOVED BY EKBERG, SECONDED BY ROBERTSON, TO APPROVE THE WAIVER SO THAT A BUILDING PERMIT MAY BE PROCESSED CONDITIONAL ON A GEOTECHNICAL STUDY BEING DONE.* Councilman Robertson asked Councilman Ekberg's reason for making this waiver more specific than the other waivers in that you have requested the geotechnical study done prior to the building permit. Councilman Ekberg responded that the one considered before Mr. Hittle's was generally a flat piece of property with a 15 degree slope in one corner. Here there is a piece of property that is between a 15 percent grade and a 40 percent grade. *MOTION CARRIED WITH DUFFLE VOTING NO. WAIVER IS GRANTED WITH CONDITIONS. Mike Easter addressed the Council with his proposal to build two single family homes at 4820 So. 150th Street. He noted that there are no large trees on the property. The houses would be built on what is now a pasture. In response. to Council President Hernandez' question of urgency, he noted that to wait until after the moratorium expires, he will lose the ability to schedule sub - contractors for early summer and the interest rate is unstable. Councilman Moriwaki asked Mr. Easter if he would be willing to conform with the adopted SAO at his own risk and expense. Mr. Easter replied that regarding surface water management, he had assumed that he would have to put in some type of infiltration system to handle the downspouts. He commented that he wouldn't mind creating some water diversion or more extensive infiltration systems, but if he has to put in a 400 foot storm drain, he might want to apply for some help. He stated he would be willing to take care of any water he personally diverted. MOVED BY MORIWAKI, SECONDED BY DUFFLE, THAT A WAIVER BE GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE PETITIONER FILING AN AGREEMENT TO CONFORM TO THE ADOPTED SENSITIVE AREAS ORDINANCE AND TO PROCESS APPLICATIONS AT HIS OWN RISK AND EXPENSE. MOTION CARRIED. Director of Community Develop Rick Beeler noted that Council did not impose the condition subject to the petitioner filing an agreement on Mr. Hittle's waiver request as with the other requests, but they did impose the geotechnical study. Councilman Robertson stated that when he seconded the motion, he did it with the intent and understanding that it was similar to all the other waivers we have granted with the exception that it had an additional item to it, and that was that they had to do a geotechnical report. Council concurred with Councilman Robertson. • Councilman Robertson reported on the SKCTBD. He commented that it is beneficial to the City to join in this program, and there is a very low risk in the way it is set up to start. To get the "flexible" TBD going we will make public notice but not a mailing to everyone. The TBD cannot issue debt to start with. Therefore, it is fairly low risk at this point. We can modify the boundaries or get out of it easily. Our commitment at this time will help to hire an administrator and a consultant to put together a project list. We will also be able to finalize the rules as to how the "flexible" TBD would work. Tukwila's commitment is only $8,000 and we can back out at any time. After the O tt year, all of the jurisdictions may decide to jointly go into a "strict" D. Regular Council Meeting February 20, 1990 Page 8 New Business ( con't) South King County Transportation Benefit District Bid Award for Construction Improvements on 57th Ave. So. REPORTS ADJOURNMENT 10:02p.m. In this TBD we would actually notify property owners and the City would be allowed to issue debt. The benefits at this time are twofold: 1) it starts the jurisdictions working together on transportation, and 2) if the state goes ahead with the gas tax, they may look favorably upon transportation benefits districts because the state legislature created them. We may be able to gain funding that we would not have access to otherwise. CouncilmanRobertson concluded by stating he is strongly in favor of this first step. MOVED BY HERNANDEZ, SECONDED BY DUFFLE, THAT COUNCIL APPROVE THE MODEL RESOLUTION AND APPOINT DENNIS ROBERTSON AS REPRESENTATIVE TO THE SOUTH KING COUNTY TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT.* Regarding debt, Councilman Lawrence asked if there is a responsibility to all the parties to all the debt or is the debt individualized as to what's actually being done within our jurisdiction. Ross Earnst explained that this "flexible' TBD cannot issue debt. However, a TBD that is able to issue debt would incur the debt itself, not the cities. There is a lid on total debt. If the TBD uses up some of that lid, the cities don't have that available to them. Ross Earnst explained that Tukwila's share of $8,395 was determined by the population of 10,800. *MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Rants suggested that in the future we do not use the same company for both consulting and inspecting. MOVED BY ROBERTSON, SECONDED BY RANTS THAT COUNCIL AWARD THE BID FOR CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS ON 57TH AVE. SO. TO MAM CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $28,992.12 WITH THE CONDITION THAT ANOTHER FIRM DO THE INSPECTIONS. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY ROBERTSON, SECONDED BY LAWRENCE THAT THE BRIGADOON RIDGE PUBLIC HEARING BE SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 5TH COUNCIL MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Moriwaki re rted that he had been selected as a representative to Puget Sound Council of Governments. MOVED BY ROBERTSON, SECONDED BY HERNANDEZ, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. MOTION CARRIED. Gary L. Van Dusen, Mayor iw [et-a ;`: • Cantu, Deputy City Cl erk LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SAID SECTION 15; THENCE SOUTH 89 56' 42.5" EAST 270 FEET; THENCE NORTH 57 41' 12.5" EAST 362.11 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID ROAD NORTHWESTERLY ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 894.02 FEET A DISTANCE 46.45 FEET; THENCE NORTH 31 08' 30" WEST 132.93 FEET; THENCE ON CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 70 FEET A DISTANCE OF 65.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84 28' 00" WEST 145.71 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 189.15 FEET A DISTANCE OF 40.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CURVE 68.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 32 28' 20" WEST 108.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 35 34' 00" EAST 55.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 84 28' 00" EAST 35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 25 46' 18" EAST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. BEING KNOWN AS THE NORTHWESTERLY 1/2 OF LOT 9 AND ALL OF LOT 10, HELLWIGS ADDITION TO FOSTER UNRECORDED PLAT. Tax ID 322920 - 0047 -00 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA APR 0 2 1990 PERMIT CENTER RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA APR 0 2 1990 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PERMIT CENTER THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SAID SECTION 15; THENCE SOUTH 89 56' 42.5" EAST 270 FEET; THENCE NORTH 57 41' 12.5" EAST 362.11 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF JAMES CLARK COUNTY ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID ROAD NORTHWESTERLY ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 894.02 FEET A DISTANCE 46.45 FEET; THENCE NORTH 31 08' 30" WEST 132.93 FEET; THENCE ON CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 70 FEET A DISTANCE OF 65.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84 28' 00" WEST 145.71 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF. 189.15 FEET A DISTANCE OF 40.86 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CURVE 68.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 32 28' 20" WEST 108.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 35 34' 00" EAST 55.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 84 28' 00" EAST 35 FEET; THENCE NORTH 25 46' 18" EAST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. BEING KNOWN AS THE NORTHWESTERLY 1/2 OF LOT 9 AND ALL OF LOT 10, HELLWIGS ADDITION TO FOSTER UNRECORDED PLAT. Tax ID 322920 - 0047 -00 Agreement To Be Subject To A Sensitive Areas Ordinance 3/15/90 APR 0 2 1990 The undersigned owner and developer of real property loEind U/ 2 S• . 13R t 5T, - rokusILA and more specifically described in Exhibit A httached hereto, hereby agrees, pursuant to the requirements of Tukwila Ordinance No.'s 1544 and 1550, that if the City of Tukwila will process the following applications: PUt L Otk (,- (Fbti-m P -Rm 1-r - / 0-rat-Ty P m i T # 1'D - 035 U RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA the development of the property described in Exhibit A will be subject to all of the Sensitive Areas Ordinance provisions as finally passed by the City Council even though those provisions may be more restrictive than any conditions or limitations imposed by or resulting from the processes described above. The Undersigned agree(s) that these processes will be continued solely at their risk and expense and that the result of the .final Sensitive Area Ordinance may be to require extensive project modification and re- evaluation or recision of the above approvals. It is also understood and agreed that continuation of • these processes does not mean that applications not pending on November 20, 1989, for this project, will be accepted or processed unless the City Council approves a petition therefor. The undersigned acknowledges that the covenants herein run with the land described in Exhibit A and that this document will be recorded with the King County Department of Records and Elections and that these covenants cannot be released without the written consent of the City of Tukwila. Dated , 1990. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) On this day personally appeared before me , to me known to be the individual described in and who executed this instrument, and acknowledged that s /he signed the same as a free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at My appointment expires PROPERTY OWNER Craid_Hittle PHONE 243 -4173 A DDRESS 4631 South 138th Street Tukwila. WN ZIP 98168 CONTRACTOR Self PHONE ADDRESS ZIP WA. ST. CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE # EXP. DATE ARCHITECT • PHONE ADDRESS ZIP TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: Y -N UBC EDITION (year) SETBACKS: N _ S - E - W — FIRE PROTECTION: OSprinklers [] Detectors ® N /A C�UIRED UTILITY PERMITS RE ? Q Yes 0 No (through Public Works) ZONING: R BAR /LAND USE CONDITIONSO on No :ONDITIONS (other than those noted on or attached topermit/plans): n WF+FtOVEO FOR I i .. BUILDING SSUANCE BY: ;�iJ •4Li, A OFFICIAL DATE: 57 - I hereby certify that I have read a • 1 xamined this permit and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of law and ordinances governing this work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local laws regulating construction or the performance or work. I am authorized to sign for and obtain this building permit. / iIGNATURE: .e_ `4i. ■,� Ai • DATE 6 — --' • 'RINT NAME: Le (- I (1 L f COMPANY CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development - Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 (206) 433-1849 BUILDING PERMIT NO. DATE ISSUED: TOTA ` USE I FCtXaFi (00(0 PROJECT INronMA HON 4637 S 138 St PLAN ClUILUIIU F I1MII (POST WITH INSPL (ION CARD AND PLANS IN A CONSPICUOUS LOCATION) • DESCRIPTION BUILDING PERMIT FEE PLAN CHECK FEE 135.00 88,00 4.50 BUILDING SURCHARGE ENERGY SURCHARGE OTHER: TOTAL - AMOUNT 227.50 R DATE 5 0 -90 t 9d CHECK UI 90 -152 V U FEES I 12,000.00 PROJECT NAME /TENANT ASSESSOR ACCOUNT # Hittle Crai 322920-S947 TYPE OF 0 New Building U Addition L Tenant Improvement (commercial) L Demolition (building) o Grading/Fill WORK: 0 Rack Storage 0 Reroof 0 Remodel (residential) ® Other Fnundatinn DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE: Construct foundation for relocated house. CODE COMPLIANCE 4 / 1 / I I SQUARE OCC. SQUARE OCC. SQUARE OCC. SQUARE OCC. SQUARE OCC. TOTAL TOTAL 4 FEET LOAD FEET LOAD . FEET LOAD FEET LOAD . FEET LOAD . SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD L This permit shall become null and void if the work is not commenced within 180 days from the date of issuance, or if the work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days from the last inspection. :ERTIFICATE OF )CCUPANCY NO. DATE ISSUED: • frANDE Et EV t ( 0 0 17 x 22 MINTED ON NO. 100014 CLEARPHINT [ ....1......., w .....1.• Vi ..e /Tv. ■•■•■64..... •, ....fir- • • •-• . Foth0DATi0 814gKi /FrPRII _44'‘ x Ice toc cA.,7 6 f) rvc, rAonel pu rb 6MR ROI* Povvet,) OPvLL \ .. 4)1Q gx .). Cr) PLAE:TE. OkLL. 0.3 "Oex, : el Tih) a\N •-. . , . , „ „ .••••■•••■fteArrn. .4■46/446.41.6 tA L t., el 8 .14ttiiRk, Ct< ,),0c,R L4 FOtyyvsv 4' • 1.4 te-7 i-kPiRtPAO I4 4 • • "0' 46 M "STA t‘ DA Rt) F LA ' _ _ • _ • — •• • elta. • • • . . . • • ■1 • 1.4 X 1 Do c p E<1'$TIOG-- Ft-oR c2: x g 0 C c..agc (0' 50rimRt ■■•• 4 ,646 • 1 4 41.46 4 / 6 46646.41 6 AVAtzriA;;'A 41 4014VOgifilgt? • • • • I le c.04. - V ft plc Fgoel DtzAik,v Te) 52riNR PKA1N) W7 69RAWE, ELe\o/ ;:7 , _,.....,_. ....._._, . .... ..•, . .., , i''''',..,:', -,-,'''.- • .,. ,,,,,. ' ,..',,.. .,;,,,., ,..„.„ III -..-„ 1 •••"'''? -, '• '' „, .•• 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111IFIIIIIII ',' : •-'''„"Ile,: . - :: ; . 1 tl.f 11 11 1111111 rN.,=:,..,,.-,.:.,::....4 11111111 11111111111111111111111 . 1 ill Ill 11 0 16 THS INCH 1 2 3'. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOTE: If the microfilmed document is less clear than this notice, it is due to the quality of the priginal document. 1 1 MADE IN GERMANY 12 ■-■ H i • • CiTY OF TUKWILA APPROVED JUL 2 3 19 BUILDING DIVISION :f • 4 FILE COPY - gaviosilk SIT CITY -; :Nil A JUL 1 7 1990 PEN ;VII I CEN TE R • • , . . understand that the Pl'en Check approvals are siibiect to errors and on and approvaI vtotation of any adopted code or • - of con tractor's copy of approvz:i: 4P. plans does no By Date 1st e rip Permit No. 4641646.6.44.L : Rcknowledg e . 161644141.41.6116/2 • 17 X 22 PRINTED ON NO. 1000H CtLARPRINV• • APPROVED BY: cm OF AP PROV W ED JUL 2 3 ¶990 EtAlk BUiLoiNG € IViSi0N - r 0 E ) :1 Da3tJ S'poo'f` PK i>!.s% Ro uND Roca . ' ►t PEAF PvC rit3ER6Aft5. sc.sgE PEpFoRA' 'gp ?NC_. f3FR 6 ,c, I(; ---- S AlJG GRivAt, 81" # (30 5. 5 EST Ti 6 )3 s 3P(-1s‘- „ 6"'I'"' t�t Foc r!t. (- i E - K C tt1-1 j3A6aa" rF JI RAM. 6. "et ;•6 tig/) QD, • mo € Ho L)s k. - r - o 5 1-7 AteD AN SE, 7"4*, °;:.:t , ;. ; EXGto P T::: pc :vM Fool MAR 3L04K5 Pa .) R `Qil a l: 11 E r.) ! a W IN I„ t„ 5 A_NA j • I'tgcocb5g,D & RADI.=. c_�sl rb'N.mu -T: .cL k Vc.'66K rot cT'S b_) I �� SP1,i L 4 ' ,i4: ■.t wwtip__L4. +M_r+ +.a Fout `��L ^ :4 • .,k j(5 C.C. 1 r` -- -r ---- - _. L3 - .P:id, t-1oR. L L. oef: s +t:.L /ro - r- 8 "FITTAC—NCG ro Ft_ae R - 3'otSTS Hocts: TRE cu RE 0 T 5butODA-rtod VIA Roc-r" c.o:4c.Re.i . AND Nor' -0 Tn FgsomG (A)ALcrs • ,,...rte,. 0R>t"O1ra ' 4c,&` )( 3 :' !• C4 R E 1 • t_r,9 f I .. o t o p; f4 Ho u s L ,4WD & r/3 P'-sTs 5 E-w E 4 #?1 G tk) T"e.R ) pp p r4A - `M' 1;50k. S4A `a# :. 1 4 L.Y s t owl G- a N NS'at, ERA rAC.„.0 , _tot P R td tmAvak 1.3! r,'t?* 1..1 0 1 0 LE i 11)R1 . VR 51,iCHTLY DE, f) Ni> .. 7 _V.. ' 1 ) - $ . P 7 isP HA 1) f - tik„t' .s — ■■•■ •- •' tiV,- 4'4 :47-4 •. 3 - :c x4 flEADE.P, Y 4f Arek4MV! ° ' *ski? ? 4J e 5 , .. M:' t'; . r1PISci i . ,.. :'z25i' � ^dsF f i' . 1 , .....'.�. A :.:�"' sa✓.Fara3A ai:v I j j l l f i i l ! I 1 j l �ljl�! jllljliljilijl�l( Illfl�l�llljl�l jllljl �Ijll! ji�ijlll�illjfl! j! I! j! Ilj!` I�Ijij!!(! I! j! �j�jl! ji'! �f�jljj! ii ���jjll !�`�I!jilj�!�jj�ijjf�j�j` 0 i6 THS INCH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 IMUEIH OERMMfY 12 NOTE: If the microfilmed document is less clear than this _.`da:s:y./ „:.`„44 g444 x{Ita:t 't= .. •+�stv Sa. VAC' d tale I VV T • l ( I F t 1 • I) ylparAteTrAnr.A Aura raeraraorrrarsasarrounorroor*Arrr Arrrs.i. lderstand that the Plan Check approvals are subject to errors and omissions and approval of plans does not authorize the violation of any adopted code or ordinance. Receipt of con- I tractor's copy of approved plans acknowledged. 1 By Da te ....::)--::—.0--0.2.7:9 _Q.__ Perrnit'No. .._6.0.S ....1*..........0•000.Averra........*afai, ... sm.,. • zriars.r..rerti. 1--r-■„ ■ . 1 I I , -c-) / \ i \ T •r) • \a - -4! • 1."••••• L —1 - .... 41 pak ........., .1 • • :\41 .* .• eR I 4> -4 A (Ne (./ te• ‘fe 1- <ce 0 .\\ t, D. 'C o. 05.3 t19. .. • a_ti , ,, • ..,. ...\ .. , .,.. •-• 0 le TH. iNcu 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 )442E MERMAIff 12 NOTE: If the microfilmed document is less clear than this 17 X 22 b�aJt2x',u_ : 5�1 PRINTED ON NO. 1000H CLEARPRINT• $L OPE • rfkkis Irlc>ra re,-1-)11, . 1 t ('-!''t . i? f':. 3?�. 5&: ?;Ai -3T 4 1 r , r 4T E[4 t1t (74-* 3 .5) 'A F. � t 4 q.' 109 DRAWAl,BY d .'j 1W� �tt;y' E VE. Cs>r. T I E flS qtr. ( & ) A - 7 061 iNtz cs' 11.2' 'X I S T.t S i ti �r 'R.04 y SToRYri, DRAtN E FR, ,- P1rt ) PERMIT - 5D 1119 ,r. .t Ex 16 s-1 E ; J 109 r, 2 f: 4 5 6 7 8 9 NOTE: if the microfilmed document is less clear than this notice. it is due to t hA nia 1 i tv of the :nr4 ei .,� 1 +inr vn�rt Q CRR P LE/r51:4.5 FERr4 it' -r-c PER I 1 T • f' >. a.y1 IN(3' 555 . AND rA 5E.Ye)FNT I 11 1 1 ! I! I !I!I!I!I!I! 0 I6TH51NCH 1 10 11 NpDEIN0ERMANY 12 PEW aG.' y o E. BO, t t, - f1'CZ..bR01:N (S- '7P C 1 T °t" j f,F D irr:.b TDB' t-gVi 101 � . rA /03 6).101 TARN! E v4E.p f ifsttt T To B E a6 751. e%it"D FA J `L -V0E- , 4 17%22 G-ANDE eL E/ Of ELEA PRINTED ON NO. 1000H CLEARPRINT • I C 2,z-r x Icc u..1! cA, � Pew u3- Fmrtt.C. -5 riw tt)ta ot 1‘ e' 'F ° R tj $NI c y\f\ ik S0 '11 1-cp D \\\ oc_R , L f 7N‘ I Riatrto(3- 0 1)"?('‘ gcre-IA F bEetrft / VC, rADYY1 Focin ;Rft - r - c ) 5Tb Rri 17)RNIs,\ P/ 04/R LOCX.S. T Gvi PO 515 et, OAL.L. oPc-RE LL I" F rt -r Lc;p El;fkisi,V,- So \ c•o 6.2" Frvt 4' thl I- L. (f 1' L A R 'PA k- r4 L NR Bi C.K tr3liti000 OPE-0106' "x6' c.,aNciz. s oh "SritINDARtf FooTiitifr! 5-Xts1r FLooR. - 3 - 6%%-rs /6" o,c, t - r - - - r.T ZEAM ‘‘ x 8‘‘ Ii FONsaw1440•1■16 FILE COPY I understand that the Plan Check approvals are subject to errors and omissions and approval of plans does not authorize the violation of any adopted code or ordinance. Receipt of con- tractor's copy of approved I s acknowledged. Date Permit No. By .....u44/0/---- 44461r PVc FgotA le /e - 5>T PIKAN tti (RA br-'• Ec_aV "• , I 0 le MS INC" 2 I' 3 ' 4 5 6 7 8 9 " i 10 11 rADEINKRium 12 ; . i NOTE: If the microfilmed document is less clear than this . ( - , notice- it is due to the naaiity nf thn etricrinni Anr”mdint f ! 1 ! Ah CITY OF TUKWILA APPROVED • JUL 3 0 1990 APPROVED BY: BUILDING DIVISION RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA 10 1990 PERMIT CENTER 4 . • ?, • PRINTED ON NO. 1000N CLEARPRINT • 1 AWl., i s f =. . s 1. _ _ .. �c REt TH 'rr?trl VARY - 5 7ao40 V. RtA-ri >J op" p1" ti eSF imploPivo s . 3 . a xb putDok I h) 1 " O U tO A "i" t otki — (! I gi.£ 'J REVISED DRAWING NUMDE ram •Do'u SfbOT ARPtimS 'MP roRr+1t D 17 X 22 ...••411*1' ...�_ Ro uAI /toCK if ti PEAF PvC 'L4i'ic Sc.REEN PEAFoRPITED PVC.. PEP' Rfl � :$$ tf leg eAR rcZE ,'T'' . 3 l; - CRo 5 F.cTt "STAArtn Foci ) t 411 ge fk Po P vtik ss Gil Rl" L" \! S - AA ( SRwG oA. G-RAvEL I` aka fj a 8" [ £ �c t.tiwe k PL P Ttc g.Kc 1 -r g. ASS Mee,' - r IR A. (TG lit 6 E. e‘/) moVrr• 1 5tr : lRtJA AP15E, - r 1P. a. 5.xGF,A4 AT 1 R . Fki10 paU Fan ;'tt,?&S ?)Lfl;$ BLocK5 1rJSr 14 'Pot DfZotRN5. flboFts BfaF:t�►t~r�7 L3At -15 �taA 1'rJ s r t) L L. F7o1AL,6 ' tai S- )C to N S til t, U t <) 1 13 ( D X X fi o P E.1,1 t t,} 6. , � T Is 4.-:r`� 1 FAA) e,oRae. Mtv4 tN`"rr.RUALs. _ yr I .) 1/Alx 10" ;�css i ric)r,'tr,D 'ro�.c.L. FL ool2 s- T'S .. PAtsfoSE. CaPkt- . tiolk ' Vim= \ i' airssal•,i I' ll! JI'II III IIIIIiI�IIIIIII11IIIIII�IIIIII �I�II' III,lI'lII III IIIIII IIIIII�IIJJIII�III ,IIIIIIIiIIII'IIJIII�'III II�II 0 I6 THS INCH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NOTE: If the microfilmed document is less clear than thin II J I I I I I II II II 9 10 11 /4WEINOER"r1 12 CDX tie,14"7 t 1 I - Hof HousZ )NQ ZrNt't"i4,c: P.b.S PROP, roK -A; 1 ' rook SL F s (AL S, a, c, o)'NST1C. WI id Da t./4.1" -, P ti, 5, E. c:, tapPL,y S t Q (NG- ' f54\) FRAv1E.D fit)fZrket0 rt4S0L ford FAIAmi P,:rtear.1 peR a:‘, , rr, (,0‘ Jpeafk stns. /Tot' pLATt;. Tra 8 - FITT - AtHED r FLo O F Hoc S£. " HEt. 5E.cv Rap ro 5buN0kyr god ,; VIM 4 3 - Bo LT' 1 To CoJ RE:rE. AND t4a1'61' • 7 F EO to 4 4,s t'3 '1-1 : Eflq ic. rTfrrES) E; 4Rt; t\ 7 EA‘.. � ,s gh i # %.lA) C! 4..'T DRAWN •REV. kr, :` �. . I . RECEIVE[) f CITY OF TUKWILA 0 CT 2 41990 PERMIrCENTER _:.+__r — ."._._._.r_�..O�a... a� :- • :.sa.�. r o:" �L:25i:atfritav,�_4.a.:_.. ,c1wi1C'c3r� ���-. � -r, r ,r .• . •: y.. . -fi b.•.. ,r,• ��.,r"-�. N - re Pr:, AKTZ.efl • 4:4 Ss' STof.W\ GIRAg3 E T. c,J rte. viEG r Y \s rr ' f :\ HARP CLAY / • /, AT' a• RAD F r ! ;,rte i y • - f4* ti • Dp.f; t l • I 561. t is ; PVC. PIP I ,\ \ o' _ s • k$Cf'�ti"t' .: 0kt , " Ili FILE COPY I understand that the Plan Check approvals iife subject to errors and omissions and approval I �,;o plans does not authcriz;:.._ Iat on of any adopted code or ordinance. ""9t of con - actor's cop of approved plans ae. wiedged. Date Permit No. Mr ••■••••••• I �!Ii�ililililili�! II I! I! I! Ii, ilililil! III��. ��.. II�III�III�III�iII�III�III�III�iII�Iii�IIi�III�III�III�III�III�IIIIIIiIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIi� l IIII ^il�lilililili.IiF���ill 0 I6THSINCH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOTE: If the microfilmed document is less clear than this anti rc+_ i t i c r1ii to th.e. env l i t• ..f ru e VOR 130 ,,..„ bean ONLY C1T1 � � ' E D NPC OCT 251990 Rev aftv I K:.! Ir1 t .�R : R S L' F. fi t' �rc. ca ►i I i PE s; fft ` Sr (NG- 55'S AtdG - h5 E ri'1�r3"E cf' toe E loa,� IIIIIIIIIIIItIII!IIIIIIIII 11 MADE INGERMAKY 12 Iig_DING DIVISION „ ? (VA N'N N, ,,. Agui c ciq 1b 6e. Bo I t.-�- 11.1) FKVA HouSE. f1c4. REs;ti& Tv sR,. \ T'AR; ( E_R PF f 'r $ " To B>:, o &1'f10Eb FRRrA VAL-VI , N E43 PPiRrt,Trcr�.. 'QPRT,'i"'trv� Y`iftiG -.. Pf1RTirioM r_ yr cr D N CA E fd�t►J �'' PP,f�ti'1'"tTi c\pElJu • t ' c • V 3e DooR RE. P4 ActP APPROVED BY: epechwts DRAWIN43 NUMBER .i. Af �I�I I�I�I�ill�i�l�l ICI ICI I��I� J. "�I' ICI ICI I�! I!I ICI ICI ill l�l ICI I I I I I I I i l l ICI 11 1 1 I I I i "I I I��f �i I I I I I� I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I i 1�1 l I i I i ►_!f!� 1�i, Iii I i ii I I l i1 I I 111 1 1 II� II I II i►.I 0 id THS INCH 1 2 I 4_7 �...._ �. 9 10 11 ; NWEINGERMANY 12 NOTE: If the microfilmed document - is'less clear than rhic