Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 6267 - Homewood Suites - Building AThis record contains information which is exempt from public disclosure pursuant to the Washington State Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW as identified on the Digital Records Exemption Log shown below. 6267 Homewood Suites — Building A 6915 Southcenter Boulevard RECORDS DIGITAL D- ) EXEMPTION LOG THE ABOVE MENTIONED PERMIT FILE INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING REDACTED INFORMATION Page # tode Exemption = 8rlef Explanatory DeSclriptiop �t�tutel ule The Privacy Act of 1974 evinces Congress' intent that social security numbers are a private concern. As such, individuals' social security Personal Information — numbers are redacted to protect those Social Security Numbers individuals' privacy pursuant to 5 U.S.C. sec. 5 U.S.C. sec. 78 DR1 Generally — 5 U.S.C. sec. 552(a), and are also exempt from disclosure 552(a); RCW 552(a); RCW under section 42.56.070(1) of the Washington 42.56.070(1) 42.56.070(1) State Public Records Act, which exempts under the PRA records or information exempt or prohibited from disclosure under any other statute. Redactions contain Credit card numbers, debit card numbers, electronic check numbers, credit Personal Information — expiration dates, or bank or other financial RCW 62 DR2 Financial Information — account numbers, which are exempt from 42.56.230(5) RCW 42.56.230(4 5) disclosure pursuant to RCW 42.56.230(5), except when disclosure is expressly required by or governed by other law. homewood suites #a 6267 TYPE OF CONST.: V -i hr.UBC EDITION (year) 1988 SETBACKS: N- S - E- W- (through Yes 0 No public Works) FIRE PROTECTION: ®Sprinklers Q Detectors N/A UTILITY PERMITS REQUIRED? ZONING: C _ 2 'CONDITIONS BAR /LAND USE CONDITIONS? p Yes O No (other than those noted on or attached to permit/plans) PHONE 714 -661 -1020 ADDRESS 27442 Calle Arroyo, San Juan Capistrano, CA EXP DATE PROPERTY OWNER Dimension Development Co., Inc. ( PHONE 318- 352 -8238 ZIP 71457 ADDRESS 200 Front Street, Natchitoches, LA CONTRACTOR Pacific Sacon Constructors Inc. PHONE 714 -661 -1020 ADDRESS 27442 Calle Arroyo, San Juan Capistrano, CA EXP DATE ZIP 92675 10 - 03 - 91 WA. ST. CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE # PACIFSC101PC ARCHITECT Dimitri Demopolus PHONE 713- 783 -0055 ADDRESS 7277 Regency Square Boulevard, Suite 100, Houston, TX OP 77036 CITY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development- Building 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA (206) 431 -3670 Division 98188 BUILDING PERMIT NO. (Q DATE ISSUED: )c) t -qo BUILDILG PERMIT (POST WITH INSPECTION CARD AND PLANS IN A CONSPICUOUS LOCATION) 1115114*T•1:11J BUILDING PERMIT.FEE: >' PLAN CHECK FEE II I 11111 •Irlalt 1I:Tga dral , 1 791.00 1,:.1 2 959.50 6826. ■11111111 I PLAN CHECK NO.: 90 -132 i SIT 6915 Southcenter B1 E# PROJECT NAME/TENANT Homewood Suites 1/A 0 CO 429,004.00 ASSESSOR ACCOUNT # 295490- 0460 -06 TYPE OF U New Building U Addition U Tenant Improvement (commercial) U Demolition (building) U Grading/Fill WORK: Q Rack Storage 0 Reroof 0 Remodel (residential) LI Other: DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE: Construct registration, hotel office, and guest activity building. 'c>I)I I'OM1'1 InrJ('l USE .4 / / • / /.. FLOOR 1 SQUARE OCC. SQUARE OCC. SQUARE OCC. SQUARE OCC. 4C FEET LOAD FEET LOAD FEET LOAD FEET LOAD TOTAL / . SQUARE OCC. FEET LOAD TOTAL TOTAL SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE BY: 4 0 ottiir BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE: DATE: `O - I hereby certify that I have read and exa ned this permit and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of lay and ordinances governing this work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local laws regulating construction or he performance of work. I am authorized to sign for and obtain this building permit. SIGNATURE: t! _ of t& PRINT NAME:AA/I ' . I - - . Q , Q y COMPANY c ( ��elp This permit . shall become null and void If the work is not commenced within 180 days from the to of issuance, or If the work Is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days from the last inspection. I CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY NO. 9a-ol DATE ISSUED: PERMIT NO. • CONTACTED '10 i1 DATE READY DATE NOTIFIED O, ' I D (init.) ---eR_$ PERMIT EXPIRES 2nd NOTIFICATION 3RD NOTIFICATION BY: (init.) BY: nit.) AMOUNT OWING 1 ' l 9 ,? • 50 PLAN CHECK NUMBER 9Q 17Q INSTRUCTIONS TO STAFF • Contacts with applicants or requests for information should be summarized in writing by staff so that any time the status of the project may be ascertained. • Plan corrections shall be completed and approved prior to sending on to the next department. • Any conditions or requirements for the permit shall be noted on the plans or summarized concisely in the form of a formal letter or memo, which will be attached to the permit. • Please fill out your section of the tracking chart completely. Where information requested is not applicable, so note by using "N /A ". BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE/OCCUPANCY INFORMATION (to be filled out by Plan Checker) 78o1 (0 SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD TOTAL SQUARE FEET TOTAL OCCU- PANCY LOAD _12. I DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW "X" In box Indicates which departments need to review the project. it BUILDING - 310 initial review 51 FIRE - 7- Z(0 C. PLANNING PUBLIC WORKS O OTHER V1 BUILDING - final review REVIEW COMPLETED BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TRACKING PROJECT NAME SITE ADDRESS INI °7- 2(0- -`OIz. CONSULTANT: (ROUTED) FIRE PROTECTION: INIT: - ')\ � lt 9 r( 4 ro INIT: V"- /OA I to INIT: INIT: 10 - I G O ZONING: C-2. MINIMUM SETBACKS: N- PUBLIC WORKS LETTER DATED: STRUC I-- UIREME - \Qrr\12_,w(?)o a 5u1�� SUITE NO. (odIIS 500 nter I *A Date Sent - .&-& 5- 90 _ ME ate Approved - I Sprinklers ] Detectors (1 N/A FIRE DEPT. LETTER DATED: P - 1 n( INSPECTOR: C' /?, [BAR/LAND USE CONDITIONS? REFERENCE FILE NOS.: 8? 8 7- G -- SM 4) S. UTILITY PERMITS REQUIRED? ( Yes (1 No o frJ� 0 0 . . C 1 0 (year): iclSS E- W- J1No SITE ADDRESS SUITE # W 15 Va `o I -Pv i� VALUE OF CONSTRUC I a-41149 - $ 4 & 9, 00Lt. ASSESSOR ACCOUNT # 295490- 0460 -06 PROJECT NAME/TENANT HOMEWOOD SUITES HOTEL •ovki TYPE OF CU New Building U Addition U Tenant Improvement (commercial) U Demolition (building) WORK: ❑ Rack Stora•e ❑ Reroof ❑ Remodel (residential) ❑ Other: DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE: Construction o a 114 unit suite hotel consisting of 7 structures of between 1 & 3 stories in height, surface parking, an in- ground pool & whirlpool Sport Court & Pedestrian Pathway: BUILDING USE (office, warehouse, etc.) Building A -1: Registration, Hotel Office, Guest Activity Building NATURE OF BUSINESS: Hotel WILL THERE BE A CHANGE IN USE? U No U Yes IF YES, EXPLAIN: SQUARE FOOTAGE - Building: 8435 s. f . Tenant Space: Area of Construction: WILL THERE BE STORAGE OR USE OF FLAMMABLE, COMBUSTIBLE OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN THE BUILDING? ® No ❑ Yes IF YES, EXPLAIN: PROPERTY OWNER Attachment 2 PHONE ADDRESS ZIP 'CONTRACTOR To be determined prior to permit issuance PHONE ADDRESS ZIP WA. ST. CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE # EXP. DATE ARCHITECT Dimitri Demopolus PHONE 713/783 -0055 ADDRESS 7277 Regency Sq. Blvd Suite IUU Houston I X ZIP 77036 .HERESY CERTIFY THAT I .MAVE'.READ <AN! ...... 'NED.THIS.APPUOAT.ION AND': KNAW TRUE'AND CORRECT':;.._ , .;,,,, -=- - yel - D.T.J. •9LY'FOR'THIS :PERMIT BUILDING OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT SIGNATURE gut.-- .t DATE Yza 9 PRINT NAME Touma Engineers PHONE 255 -4100 ADDRESS 15668 W. Valley Hwy. Seattle WA CITY /ZIP 98188 CONTACT PERSON Tom Touma PHONE 255 -4100 f CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development - Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 (206) 433 -1849 APPLICATION MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY BUILDIN3 PERMIT APPLICATION DESCRIPTION FEES BUILDING PERMIT FEE' PLAN CHECK FEE BUILDING SURCHARGE ENERGY•SURCHARGE OTHER TOTAL - (for staff use only) AMOUNT 0i RCPT # I,' `11.00 , 1104.00 (iff (p A -1 DATE 3 -ao -96 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL In order to ensure that your application is accepted for plan review, please make sure to fill out the application completely and follow the plan submittal checklist on the reverse side of this form. Handouts are available at the Building counter which provide more detailed information on application and plan submittal requirements. Application and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. VALUATION OF CONSTRUCTION Valuation for new construction and additions are calculated by the Department of Community Development prior to application submittal. Contact the Permit Coord'.nator at 4133 - 1851 prior to submitting application. In all cases, a valuation amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be reviewed and is subject to possible revision by the Building Division to comply with current fee schedules. BUILDING OWNER / AUTHORIZED AGENT If the applicant is other than the owner, registered architect/engineer, or contractor licensed by the State of Washington, a notarized letter from the property owner authorizing the agent to submit this permit application and obtain the permit will be required as part of this submittal. EXPIRATION OF PLAN REVIEW Applications for which no permit is Issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitations. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the applicant as defined in Section 304(d) of the Uniform Building Code (current edition). No application shall be extended more than once. If you have any questions about our process or plan submittal requirements, please contact the Department of Community Development Building Division at 433-1849. DATE APPLICATION ACCEPTED Hof t0 DATE APPLICATION EXPIRES 03130749 COMMERCIAL NEW. COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS /ADDITIONS LZ Completed budding permit application (one for each structure) NI Assessor Aocount Number sets (2) of the following: Specifications Structural calculations stamped by a Washington State licensed . engineer • . Soda report stamped by a Washington State licensed engineer • lg.J Topographical survey N t ri. t Energy calculations stamped 6y a Washington State licensed engineer or architect J Legal description .. :. Working stamped by a Washington State Iicen architect, which Include .Site plan • Architectural drawings .Structural drawings V/ Mechanical drawings• •••.Elevations ; • ■• CM drawings:':: ' Landscape plan . )(' Completed utility permit application (one for entire pro ject) Six (6) sets of civil drawings • NOTE: See utility permit application and check ist for specific uNi ty submittal requirements :RACK STORAGE: Completed building permit applicable Assessor Account Number Twa (2) sets of plans, which indude; Budding floor plan showing: • Entire space where racks will be loca • Exit doors • Dimensions of all aisles Tenant space floor plan showing rack'storage buyout, aisles and NOTE: lnclualadimensions of racks (height, ;width +scud le aisles; an d exit ways on plan E Structural calculations stamped by a Washington State licensed. engineer (rack storage Wand over), RESIDENTIAL ABMITTAL CHECKLIST NEW SINGLE•FAMILY DWELUNGSIADDITIONB ; :. : Completed building permit application (one for each structure Legal description El Assessor Account Number; C Two sets (2) of working drawings, which include • Site plan •. Foundation plan • Floor plan • Roof plan • Building. elevations (all views) :. • Building cross - section • Structural framing plans Washington State Energy Code data. is Completed utility permit application • Six (6) sets of site plans showing utilities NOTE: Building site plan and utility site plan may be combined. See utility permit application and checklist for specify submittal requirements: Additional topographical and soils information may required if unique • site conditions, REROOF Completed building permit application (ono for each.structure Assessor Account Number Q Narrative describing existing: roof, material being removed, an ' material being installed; ANTENNA/SATELUTE: DISHES • Completed building permit application Details antenna/satellite dish and method of attachment : Structural calculations stamped by a Washington State Incens englneer.may. be, required . ■OTE:. A Certification letter is required poor. to final Inspection acrd sign- : off of the permit Assessor Account Number Two (2) sets of plans, which include Site Plan (showing building and location of antenna/satellite dish COMMERCIAL TENANT IMPROVEMENTS Completed building permit application (one for each atructure•or • tenant) .:. . Assessor Account Number; • Two ( sets of constnictionplans, which include Site plan Location of tenant space • Existing 'and proposed parkin •Overall building plan Tenant location Use of adjacent (common wall) tenant •Overall dimensions of building or square footage Floor plan • of .proposed tenant space • Tenant space plan, with use of each room labelled. •.. E doors, egress patterns...... r .New walls,;exIsting wall; and wads to be demolished Construction deceits. Cross sections showing wail constnuction and method of • attachment for floor and calling Structural calculations stamped by a Washington. State licensed ': engineer may be required if structural work is to be done (2 s©ts NOTE: : :liany utility work Is to be done, submit separate utility permit application and plans RESIDENTIAL REMODELS n . Completed building permit application (one for each structure Assessor Account Number (2) sett of working drawings, which: include Site plan Foundation plan. ■ Floor p!4n • ■ Roof plan >. Building elevations. (all views) Building cross-section;: • Structural framing plans N If, any utility work is to be done provide utility permit application :and plan must be submitted REROQFB Completed building permit application (one for each structure Assessor Account Number Narrative describing existing roof, material being removed, and material being installed. NOTE: A certification letter Is required prior to final inspection and sign - all of the permit November 8, 1991 Mr. Ralph Thiergart FTRC Hotels, L.P. Dear Mr. Thiergart: Based on our conversation, and your letter, dtd 11/7/91, it has been determined that the trailer in question will be . considered a "construction office" and will not require a permit. The following conditions apply: a. The trailer will not be used to do any business with the general public and the general public will not have access to it. b. The trailer will be allowed on the Homewood Suite construction site only for the duration of construction. c. Adequate separation for fire protection /prevention between the trailer and other structures must be maintained. d. To the maximum extent feasible the trailer shall not be visible from the public streets.. No sales advertising or banners shall be attached to the trailer. A copy of this letter should be posted in a conspicuous location in the trailer. •ae r,n Building Official November 7, 1991 Mr. Duane Griffin Building Official - City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Griffin: Thanks so much for sharing a few moments of your time with me this morning. I understand your concerns with the office trailer that was delivered to our job site yesterday morning. I've also now read and understand the city's Administrative Policy Procedure governing the set -up and usage of temporary, portable offices, which are permitted in M -1, M -2L and M -2 zones. And, as I understand it, your principal concern is that the trailer delivered yesterday would be viewed as a "temporary portable office," which is not permitted in a C -2 zone, where our Homewood Suites Hotel is being built. If I may, I'd like to clarify the proposed usage of the trailer, because I believe the spirit and intent of the trailer's usage falls under point number two (construction offices) of the city's Administrative Policy Procedure memorandum. It is our intent to use the trailer to house the hotel's General Manager, Operations Manager, Director of Sales and Secretary. The hotel's General Manager and Operations Manager must work on -site to oversee the final construction phases of the hotel. The hotel's Director of Sales would use the trailer as a base from which to work with area companies who would use the hotel after opening. (continued) Ralph Thiergart FrRC Hotels, L.P. (817) 545-1030 Mr. Duane Griffin Page Two There would be no instances in which the public would be solicited or have reason to have . contact with anyone on the job site. The trailer is not in any way proposed as an office in which business with the public is to be conducted. The sole purpose of the trailer is for the management staff of the hotel to have office space from which the final construction and opening of the hotel may be administered. Mr. Griffin, I understand and appreciate the need for stringent guidelines to protect the city and its residents from unsightly and unsafe temporary offices. It is my hope, however, that the city will recognize that the usage of an additional construction trailer on our job site would not pose such a concern since no contact with the public is intended. Additionally, we would gladly comply with all applicable safety and other regulatory requirements prior to occupying the additional construction trailer. I look forward to working with you. Respectfully, RT/ks Ralph Thiergart Vice President, Sales and Marketing cc: Rick Takach, Executive Vice President, Operations Project: / � 1�r» ' (5... p S of Inspection; Address; 9 zS S. c_ ,3/x,4 Date Called; �� ,// Special Instructions: Date Wanted: , am. p.m. Requester: Phone No.: INSPECTI. RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98186 (206) 431 -3670 0 Approved per applicable codes. , Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: ,//i I, / `JOEL cier.-t LS 4.5 / 6..C' % , 1 0,0 - .t*. , 4 € 429.�,h 1 s S 0 $30.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, tee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. I Recepl No.: Dale; Project: 0 L(/ri24e.( / /_ rc. • . /4°S Type of Inspection: Address 6 9 2-S s,, /3 /c.d. Date Called: /-6-9/ Special Instructions: Date Wanted: , am. p.m. Requester: Phone No.: INSPECTI NI RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 ❑ Approved per applicable codes. (206) 431 -3670 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: A4 40,1 „ •1,e 749 v SP °ltS �•f/e 5 S(l V $ ❑ $30.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. I Recept No.: Dale: CITY OF TUKWILA \, BUILDINp DIVISION 6300 S,OUTHCENTER, , TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 9M°08 a TELEPHONE (206) 431.367 ALL PERSONS ARE HEREBY ORDER POSTEDt- / • WARNING: // 6 19 `I/ OERTAININGTO CONSTRUCTION, A ERATUONS OR REPAIRS ON THESE PREMISES AT 6, 9 ? /, THIS ORDER IS ISSUED BECAUSE f- r-,,-� .�'- -�,'- � T"� .,� .�v•- �� • f� \ BY / , . �. e 9 C." Name / Title i • The failure to stop work, the re , m ing of w without 1 permission from the Building Dlyision, or the, removal, mutilation, or"'ooncealment of this notice is punishable by fine and Imprisonment. HOMEWOOD SUITES HOTEL DEVELOPMENT TUKWILA, WA. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Lots 2 and 3 of Short Plan No. 88 -1 -SS recorded under King County Recording No. 8807210416,which lots are more fully described by metes and bounds description attached. LOT 2 All that certain real property in the Cite of Tukwila, Xing County, State of Washington, and being more porticularlu dcserl.bed as follows: Commencing of Highway Engineer's Station P. O. T. t2M3 127 + .75.0 on the 2M line shown on the Stotc Hiph&ae map of primary State Highwoy 01 CSR 4053 Green River interchange, sheet 2 of 4 sheets, established by Commission Resolution 51192, Februore 15, 1962; thence, northeasterly at right angles to %ai.d 2M line North 30 27' 06" East, a distance of 284.8O feet; thence tangent to the preceding course along the arc of a curve to the left having a rodiuc of 300.00 Feet and a central angle of 08' 19' 06 ", on arc length of 43.56 feat; thence tangent to the preceding curve North 22° 08' 00" East, a distance of 309.43 feet; thence North 63 59' 57" East, a distance of 60.00 feet, to o point on the northeasterly line or Southcesnter Boulevard as conveyed to the Cite of Tukwila, b;) Deed recorded October 29, 1574 under Auditor's File 7'410290105; thence North 63 35' 49" East, a pittance of 293.37 and THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel to be described herein; thence North 63 35' 49" East, a di of '158.17 feet'; thence South 26 24' 11" East; a distance of 378.69 feet; thence South 72 08' 52" West, a distance or 159.5: feet; thence North 2E 24' 11 West, a distance of 35'4.91 feet and THE TRue POINT OF BEGINNING: LOT 3 ATTACHMENT 1 All that certain real property in the City of Tukwila, King County, State or Washington, and being more partieularlu described as follows: Commencing at Highway Engineer's Station P. O. T. (2M) 7.27 + 75.0 on the 2M line shown on the State Highwou mop of primary State Highway MS (SR 4053 Green River Interchange, sheet e of 'I sheets, established by Commission Resolution M1192, February 15, 19BR; thence, northeasterly at right angles 'to said 2M line North 30° 27' 06" East, a distance of 204.00 feet; thence tangent to the preceding course along the are of a curves to the left having a radius of 300.00 Feat and a central angle or 08 19' 05 ", on arc length of 43.56 feet; thence tangent to the preceding curve North 22 08' 00" East, a distance of 309.43 feet; thence North 63 59' 57" East, a disteanceof 60.00 feet, to a point on the northeasterly line of Southcenter Boulevard as convened to the Cite of Tukwila, bu Deed recorded October 29, 1974 under Auditor's File 7410290105; thence North 63 35' '19" East, a distance of 451.5'l Feat and THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel to be described herein; thence North 63 35' 49" East,'a distance of 168.53 feet; thence South 36° 57' 02" East, a distance of 38.26 felt; thence South 33 08' 3'i" East, a distance of 99.56 feet; thence South 34 32' 34" East, a distance of 106.77 Feet; thence South 35 10. 59" East, a distance of 102.48 feet; thence South 3:i° 5G' 05" East, a distance of 37.32 feat; thence South 5 14' 06" East, a distance of 24.25 feet; thence South 47° 32' 30" West, a distance of 10.48 feet; thence South 72 08' 5G" West, a distance of 190.55 feet; thence North 26 24' 3.3." West, a distance of 378.69 foot and THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: TUKWILA, WA HOMEW00D 'SUITES'HOTEL'DEVELOPMENT Property'Owner(s): J.D. Fiorito and Vera S. Fiorito, husband and wife; E.J. Ferullo, as and for h;i's?separate estate; and Janice Ferul to Picatti, and as for her separate estate. Owners' Attorney /Contact: Leon C. Misterick LeSourd & Patten P.S. 2400 Columbia Center Seattle, WA 98104 Phone: 206/624 -1040 Fax: 206/624 -3087 Purchaser /Applicant: Horizon. Hotels, a Louisiana General Partnership BY Dimension Development Co., Inc., A Louisiana Corporation, General Partner 200 Front Street Natchitoches, LA 71457 Phone: 318/352 -8238 Fax: ,318/352 -5093 S2d9W-1, J SJ Vii re .. ..2-4/y_i_ sr/ of io ca -3 - 8A4 EL _.Z+© 51/d./ _. "?-1/41.5,- * * REVISION SUBMITTAL * * DATE 7/Abt PROJECT NAME f 4 241-e " el-) ADDRESS CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 CONTACT PERSON 'C1 o.1 e ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER PERMIT NUMBER I o p ,4 0 .:% I'► bail (If previously issued) PLAN CHECK NUMBER TYPE OF REVISION: l.h/V )S A�p1 PMA/ / `% a".Q SHEET NUMBER(S) G/ "Cloud" or highlight all areas of re ions and date revisions. SUBMITTED TO: \52i non RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUL 2b 1 PERMIT CENTER SENT BY :Xerox Telecopier 7020: 7 -23.91 : 13:18 ; 3183522214 #23101 P 401 Keyser AV MS (71407) P.O. Boa 193 i` uchitoehee, LA 7145114/95 (318) 352 -1238 (318) 352 -2214 (Telecapler) Washington Department of Fisheries Meadow Creek office Park 22516 S.E. 64th Place, Suite 140E Issaquah, WA 98027 Attention: Gayle Xreitman July 22, 1991 Developer And !"6anagsr Of 9 OD Ut!' s April 22, 1994 Kristi S. Postel Gow & Hanna Agency, Inc. 2000 West Loop South, Suite 1400 Houston, TX 77027 RE: Maintenance Bond No. DLP0222196 - Homewood Suites, Tukwila The City of Tukwila hereby authorizes the release of the above mentioned maintenance bond dated April 22, 1992, in the amount of $2,850 to FTRC dba Homewood Suites. If you have any questions please call me at 431 - 3671. Sincerely, Shellie L. Bates Permit Technician Enclosures City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director Toctp cc: City Clerk, City of Tukwila Don Williams, Park & Recreation Dept. Public Works Department John W. Rants, Mayor A ?f)l) Rn,,th'pn/pr Anulpvar1 .Gino Mi(A • T, dwfu W,chlnelnn O121R12 /IAA) 42 1_2A711 .. `Caw /9/LU A2LOAAC APR -22 -1994. 02:59 FROM HOMEWOOD.SUITES TUKWILA TO 4313665 P. 01 HUMtwooli si es • U!AT 'April 22, 1994 (fl' UTHcE.r Ii 3 BM). ). PAX? 206e33.$04 Mr Greg Villanueva City Of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mk. Villanueva: Per your request I have enclosed a copy of the bid we have accepted to repair the bike path around the hotel. The project will be completed by May 1, 1994 with weather permitting. The Homewood Suites will also make sure the path and surrounding area is kept clean and well maintained at all times. If yeti have any further questions regarding the path before releasing the maintenance bond please give as a call at (206)433- 8000. Thank you for your attention to this matter! . Sincerely, Kari .Joneissn General /4anager Cm Recesirellen 7444 PVOMU 6 .4) 5froil NO.,•., U. ,1#:‘ 71 k r • , , t Alt c • ,1 • :•• :.•••••• • OnloMerla tweet& IR Mollie all alquiled Pir. eMbullsolh effelliisab ouplageot epee Mail. p'—. or dam us If Me eme9041afe Ceelniritit milasker laPePrialfianlai °Nita 4 lead* mid leasinfoki" le lie** Mom rya meedic4. art taloa :143e likiniilde le Woods *au* kat* le Oohed , A a wldi haat lekesidaa &cobs Mai. HOMEWOOD SUITES TUKWILA TO Wampum* kVA 1101111•11 ail tine 61111016 asenevirca aria Mete speedleitien. it die mei aft • • . ;. 1.! "*. • Plaid fa 1116 OW* Is raLlivene , ..:... 1 4' . ..•...•.••••,, ..!; rf-:.;. • ... ......,.. o . . : • *.:= .,. - : •• iii;.j.•.; ;■-?..:,;:t..?,.: '', '" . :•:“:ti' .:... • * L!:r74 1" TA ;AIT:T.I ;:! .i?e.ii. 5 1 1• eir.:,..t.:AW. • • '''. ' ' • • ' ' ''.' .. •,; ;LI' :r ,,. .Z.:.:. ., , ...,A . . . ' *. . . • . •:' ..1-. .; .— ,■ .'... oi :.■ :::.:•.-,•••••..''..;.. ..-4/..q.' ••,, • ,.• . ,; D. Box 5629 • Lynnwood, Washington 98046 Phone: 7744 283 we betley swot iwedgcnie• mei listisulu Mt St Om joie (Us. New"' Mood if sigaisty) 1 I F 1,4 5PF a t.' iw , Lue.e.. 5 or' I): W-. PATA , •• 6 : < :L' "..i , 4..ip t< t.„. . i ?i16,1 . . . . . . 1 • 17 1 . exp‘,... - es..., ;k:'.Q......tAie4\:,)S.., tte r.- (1, ....7i?.; 5, c 1...i :; 4Atr, • . . . ..... .. . . . . b. i.1 ,.., , 1 . . , . . .. . . . • .' / . '.7 e t /l ila' . i I • . 06 r rrt 0 (le es A7L4 beaker • • . •r■-. o •--j'y • OC). v . .4- z AR ?.."::?.` • . 4313665 .• • / , P . 02 TOTAL P.02 . • • ' • ! ' ' ' 'Y. ' ' O.:1 • • .'••••• livaabiesva4fidfloaltalii beiwev.eid *al y edam eel old licese ea alas CAMY.Mtm.arY arroi. elm wpm leiddref epee Oen Ire& alb *IA* PIIMAIONe1111111)1eidea 001111111•Pledell. amirowNemosolowe owiiiiiakdiwoiataiawsor ea rati careitie' pAiNiirsalioajoiirio.loir=eig %Is 4tairs ors *rafts oteour • , 1 •1".leri4..!;:Vev^:v..1 INNAY • • 40.4* die ,. • aegigenelas No. ...• litplelitioli DM AGSM PIM cc P.O. itnt) . , PO. 6 0X_ 5 -. 4 Z1 j ' yntnafi sm. . bb45 74 Code . 4 i0v4, . Melees, - 7 n/-/el 3 • . • • ,.. ., , . Telophaas a 53 f404•-• Doe AMIN (proem AN loop • ker State A)a ZAP . . Joe Locauoa ..---- i ti..) a . ' . Due °Mal • 11 "Pc' 2" It r) Cm Recesirellen 7444 PVOMU 6 .4) 5froil NO.,•., U. ,1#:‘ 71 k r • , , t Alt c • ,1 • :•• :.•••••• • OnloMerla tweet& IR Mollie all alquiled Pir. eMbullsolh effelliisab ouplageot epee Mail. p'—. or dam us If Me eme9041afe Ceelniritit milasker laPePrialfianlai °Nita 4 lead* mid leasinfoki" le lie** Mom rya meedic4. art taloa :143e likiniilde le Woods *au* kat* le Oohed , A a wldi haat lekesidaa &cobs Mai. HOMEWOOD SUITES TUKWILA TO Wampum* kVA 1101111•11 ail tine 61111016 asenevirca aria Mete speedleitien. it die mei aft • • . ;. 1.! "*. • Plaid fa 1116 OW* Is raLlivene , ..:... 1 4' . ..•...•.••••,, ..!; rf-:.;. • ... ......,.. o . . : • *.:= .,. - : •• iii;.j.•.; ;■-?..:,;:t..?,.: '', '" . :•:“:ti' .:... • * L!:r74 1" TA ;AIT:T.I ;:! .i?e.ii. 5 1 1• eir.:,..t.:AW. • • '''. ' ' • • ' ' ''.' .. •,; ;LI' :r ,,. .Z.:.:. ., , ...,A . . . ' *. . . • . •:' ..1-. .; .— ,■ .'... oi :.■ :::.:•.-,•••••..''..;.. ..-4/..q.' ••,, • ,.• . ,; D. Box 5629 • Lynnwood, Washington 98046 Phone: 7744 283 we betley swot iwedgcnie• mei listisulu Mt St Om joie (Us. New"' Mood if sigaisty) 1 I F 1,4 5PF a t.' iw , Lue.e.. 5 or' I): W-. PATA , •• 6 : < :L' "..i , 4..ip t< t.„. . i ?i16,1 . . . . . . 1 • 17 1 . exp‘,... - es..., ;k:'.Q......tAie4\:,)S.., tte r.- (1, ....7i?.; 5, c 1...i :; 4Atr, • . . . ..... .. . . . . b. i.1 ,.., , 1 . . , . . .. . . . • .' / . '.7 e t /l ila' . i I • . 06 r rrt 0 (le es A7L4 beaker • • . •r■-. o •--j'y • OC). v . .4- z AR ?.."::?.` • . 4313665 .• • / , P . 02 TOTAL P.02 . • • ' • ! ' ' ' 'Y. ' ' O.:1 • • .'••••• livaabiesva4fidfloaltalii beiwev.eid *al y edam eel old licese ea alas CAMY.Mtm.arY arroi. elm wpm leiddref epee Oen Ire& alb *IA* PIIMAIONe1111111)1eidea 001111111•Pledell. amirowNemosolowe owiiiiiakdiwoiataiawsor ea rati careitie' pAiNiirsalioajoiirio.loir=eig %Is 4tairs ors *rafts oteour • , 1 •1".leri4..!;:Vev^:v..1 INNAY • • 40.4* die ,. • SENT BY FROM: REF: 4- 7 -94 ; 1:52PM ; GOW & HANNA, GOW & HANNA AGENCY, INC. 2000 WEST LOOP SOUTH, SUITE. 1400 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77027 713 -621 -7439 FAX 713 - 621 -8038 April 7, 1994 Sheila - City of Tukwila (206) 431 -3665 Kristl S. Poste' Homewood Suites - Tukwila TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER LETI ER: 1 2064313665;# 1/ 4 Per your conversation with Bobby Mandl of Dimension Development, enclosed is a copy of the Maintenance Bond that has been in place for two (2) years. It is scheduled for renewal on April 22, 1994, but we would like to get it released before then If at all possible. I appreciate your assistance in this matter. Should you have any questions, or require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. SENT BY: :+ .} 4- 7 -94 ; 1 :53PM ; GOW & HANNA, INC. -' HAINT riANCE BOND - DAP O )qtp 3Ti2Z Or WASHINGTON Project COUNTY Or XING Location CITY 01' TVMIZ 2064313665 ;# 2/ 4 =WALL PERSONS S1' THESE PRESENTS, that We FTRC ■dba_ 'Ho_ oud S e Tukwila as Principal, and the age r nauranre Cnmpsny, a Corperat an organized and existing under the l aws of the State of Day s ., -ra and authorised to do a surety business in the State'of Washington, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Tukwila, State of Washington, in the sum of 'two Thousand Eight hundred "rift lawful money of the United States of Amer ca, for payment of Dollars which, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of the foregoing obligation is that the above named Principal has properly constructed improvements which conform to all ordinance■ and requirements of the City of Tukwila. Said improvements have been constructed within the City of Tukwila in accordance with the approved plans on file with the City of Tukwila. The Principal is required to give a bond for Two Thousand Eiitht Hundred Fifty ($ ) to protect the City of TUkaria against the resu t of au ty materials and /or workmanship used in said construction, correcting deficiencies and performing emergency maintenance and repairs for a period of not less than two years from the data of acceptance by the Tukwila City Council of the Bill of Sale and warranty Agreement an file with the City of Tukwila. Principal and surety further agree to promptly reimburse City of Tukwila for necessary emergency repairs and /or seintenarae oa said improvements. Repair: or maintenance deemed necessary by the City of Tukwila shall be performed by the Principal on receipt of written notice from the City of Tukwila directing performance of such Work. If the Principal shall fail to take steps to make such repair within twenty '(20) days after receipt of such notice, • • the City of Tukwila shall perform the work or _ hire a contractor to perform the work and the City of Tukwila shall have the right but not the 4- 7-94 ; 1:53PM ; G0W & HANNA, INC. 2064313665;# 3/ 4 SENT BY # ab l4atto►q to laa >rhi4� .••al tog ail eon La. i sulladLnsw oi►arsaaaci, b Lw ilhararty v,Lth3a are addLt.iooal tea (l0) darn. u p to the total bond amosas . tbs city shi 1 sai•asa. witboat d st any ovempayamt O tsu.i ■ WAS-oh owned amt Citt outsasto iiiit.ad to � bead aaotst. Zf 'tams awaoi; any lavnn.J.4..L. Laartit itrd to =tone* %he tayat of this bead OS to datosmio. %lha tiOtr o t any nasty hssauildas. tae �vaJ.1Li yt is a cb iitiQatios t)l►al2 bt entitled to ac.00voie limo coats. irt>l attaeoar• • ZOOS, taetartad So a Zaaalt of auoh iawmalt. •s0h11e: 111.1 +Its► 2/2/112 maxim s@1lsa 22nd olkT o ' A r : ..�i.�.�....�.. � �... . Z1 r " VIR WON lAmSoICs or • .Arriwvflo jlh a'o raitl(s 'ai• n►a►s•■iaa FTRG dba Norncw Suites Tukwila Ranger. lnsurence Company . w1as .. z:: — .inNSis Larry R. Peterson. 9920 Pacific Heights Blvd.,' Suite 500 San Diego, CA 92121 SENT BY: BOND POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the Douglass Financial Corp.. a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of Celirornta having Its principal office in the City of San Diego, Celilurnle. does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint: _Larry R. Peterson ol: San ILf.eUn. f.A the true and lawful agent and Attorney -In -Fact of Ranger Insurance Company, pursuant to the attached Power of Attorney, to make, execute, seal and deliver for and on its behalf as surety, and ha act and deed, any and all bonds, contracts;, agreements of Indemnity and other undertakings in suretyship provided. however, that the penal sum of $ 0,000.00 is granted and Is signed and seated by facsimile under and by authority of the Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of Ilse HANGER INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on November 10, 1988. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Ranger Insurance Company has caused these presents to be executed by ila Attorney-In-Fact; with its corporate seal allixed, 015.250 4- 7 -94 ; 1 :53PM ; G0W & HANNA, INC,-' rrr ��� RANGER INSURANCE COMPANY( • c/o Douglass® ,,ncial Corporation • Corporate Office, S, .sego, California STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO I On this 22n _ day of _ Apr..l , 19 49 before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of California, In and for the Courtly of Sari Diego, duly commissioned and qualified, came R. Spencer Douglass, Chairman of the Board of Douglass Financial Corp. and General Agent for Ranger Insurance Company, to me peraonaity known to be the Individual and officer described In and who executed Ise preceding instrument end he acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn. deposeth and saith, that he is the said officer of the Corporation aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding Instrument Is the Corporate Seal 01 said Company and that the said Corporate Seal and his signature as such officer were duly talked and subscribed to the said Instrument by the authority and direction of the said Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunder set my hand and affixed my Official Seal, at the City of San Diego, the day and year first above written, OIFICIAL SEAL KATHLEEN TERRY IIAN 01E00 COUNTY Y NY COMMISSION EXPIRES JANUARY 14,'1995 Data, April 22 , 1992 416.111016 .1 R. pen inw rims. Attarwy.In•Fact Notary Public SONO POWER OF ATTORNEY 2064313665;# 4/ 4 This Power of Attorney Is granted and is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Dire:lora of the RANGER INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on November 10, 1988, which said Resolution has not been amended or rescinded and of which the following is a flue, full and complete copy. "RESOLVED, That this Company do and it hereby does authorize and empower R. Spencer Douglass as Attorney -in -Fact, under its corporate seal, to apoint any person or persons or Attorney or Attorney -Fact or agent or agents of said Company, In Its name and as Its act, to execute and deliver any and all contracts, guaranteeing the performances of contracts omer than Insurance policies and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings, required or permitted In all actions or proceedings or by law allowed, In amounts not exceeding 61,000,000 (provided in accordance with the General Agency Agreement executed on November 10, 1988, between Douglass Financial Corp, and Company) in connection with the issuing of surety bail bonds, and license, permit, and miscellaneous bonds on behalf of the Company and transactions related thereto." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said RANGER INSURANCC COMPANY has caused these presents to be executed by Ile officer, with its corporate seal affixed. November 10, 1988 n Barbara P. B►asingeme. Socestary 1 STATE OF TEXAS 1 COUNTY OF HARRIS 1 On this 1 0th day of November, 1988, before tho eubeoriber, a Notary Public of the State ul Texas, In and for the County of Harris, duly commissioned and qualified, ex cu ed the prec:tidi g instrument and of she cknow INSURANCE execution of he to me same, and being m duly sworn, and sal h Ihat she Is the said officer of the Corporation aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instruments is the Corporate Seal of sold Corporation, and that the said Corporate Seal and her signature as such officer were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunder set my hand and affixed my Official Seal, at the City of Houston, the day and year first above written, Andrea Heard, .Notary Public STATE OF TEXAS 1 COUNTY OF HARRIS 1 I. undersigned, do hereby certify that the original POWER OF ATTORNEY, 01 which the foregoing Is a full, true and correct copy, is in full force and effect, and nee not been revoked. IN WITNES WH•HEREOF, I have bg subscribed my name. as Assls,g t Vice President and affixed the Corporate Seal of the Corporation, this n day of J.rr i , in Karl Hauenstein, Assistant Vice President, Ranger Insurance Company Any correspondence regarding this Power of Attorney should be addressed to Spencer Douglass Insurance Associates 9920 Pacific Heights Blvd., Suite 600. San Diego, CA 92121 401 Keyser Avenue (71457) P.O. Box 795 Natchitoches, LA 71458 -0795 (318) 352 -8238 (318) 352 -2214 (FAX) April 13, 1992 Paul Fraser City of Tukwila 6200 S. Center Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 'Dear Sir: Dimension Development has completed the trail and river benching per plans and City of Tukwila codes. We respectfully request a turnover of trail & river bench to the City of Tukwila. APR I 6 y(1 2 Developer and Manager of Holiday Inns Homewood Suites and other fine hotels CITY OF TUKWILA SEWER, WATER AND STORM CAPITAL ASSET ACQUISITION INSTRUCTIONS: This form is to be completed anytime a capital item is acquired by the City. It is to be filled in as soon as possible and forwarded to the City Clerk with complete documentation for recording. NOTE: State law requires . assets acquired from a special service district to be transferred by ordinance. TRANSACTION: 1. [ ] Developers Agreement: Name: Council Action: (Res. No. 2. [ '( ] Bill of Sale: Amt. $14 , 248 . ooFrom: Hori on Hotels Owner: ELOPMENT COORIIINATOR 3. [ ] Other: Explain ASSET DESCRIPTION: [ ] WATER [ ] SEWER [ ] STORM [ ] £i1RallaJflbIW 1tMt1CuNMK ASPHALT TRAIL AND RIVER BENCH 800 Lin. Ft. of Asphalt Maintenance Trail and River Benching total value $14,248.00 RECREATIONAL /RIVER BANK /DIKE TRAIL EASEMENT I certify that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and accurate. Signature - Department Manager I hereby approve the acceptance of the named asset(s) on behalf of the City. Mayor Recquired for assets over $25,000 in value: By Council action at the regular meeting (date: above assets were accepted. ounce rest en ATTEST7Tiry Distribution: ( ) Risk Manager ( ) Maint. Div. I, Utility ( ) City Clerk (ORIGINALS) Date Date Date Date Date: Date 4/17/92 ) of the Tukwila City Council, the ( ) Utility Asset Accounting ( ) Infrastructure File 2.00.19 DOCUMENTATION ATTACHED - List: (i.e., Bill of Sale, P.O., Receipts, Drawings, Materials List, Easements, Agreement, Permits) ( ) Bill of Sale ( ) List of Materials /Cost ( ) Ordinance /Resolution ( ) Easements ( ) Devel. Agreement ( ) Letter of Recommended ( ) Permits ( ) Drawings Acceptance ...D P 7MEN :... E A ... ATE.. .iiN.;: „ ,.. .;> ,.: BUILDING - initial review 4 -79Z 4 -7 -q Z CONSULTANT: Date sent - Date Approved - ono Cony 4. (ROUTED) BY: (Init.) FIRE 4.7 - qZ /-/ ' "9,,k' FIRE PROTECTION: (1 Sprinklers (l Detectors ( N/A FIRE DEPT. LETTER DATED: INSPECTOR: 3 INIT: ��� .�. ( ?2 Trams _L_ r r / �,% � /Jlw • I e• X"92 .4.- e..0G 0 It' r - n vr?v ZONING: BAR/LAN USE CONDITIONS? Yes No PLANNING REFERENCE FILE NOS.: INIT: VA- MINIMUM SETBACKS: N- S. E- W- 0 PUBLIC WORKS UTILITY PERMITS REQUIRED? Yes No PUBLIC WORKS LETTER DATED: INIT: Q OTHEF W Tor 10 4 &C. y/ 2 9 ' OF CONSTRUCTION: UBC EDITION (year): INIT:1 1V BUILDING - final review INIT: PERMIT NO. CONTACTED DATE READY _ DATE NOTIFIED 2nd NOTIFICATION BY: (init.) BY: (init.) PERMIT EXPIRES AMOUNT OWING 3RD NOTIFICATION BY: (Init.) - BUILDING'... APPLICATION TRACKING PROJECT NAME SITE ADDRESS lioneNew ood 3u't-t.s SUITE NO. GADS 3arthce.rl e INSTRUCTIONS TO STAFF • Contacts with applicants or requests for information should be summarized in writing by staff so that any time the status of the project may be ascertained. • Plan corrections shall be completed and approved prior to sending on to the next department. • Any conditions or requirements for the permit shall be noted on the plans or summarized concisely in the form of a formal letter or memo, which will be attached to the permit. • Please fill out your section of the tracking chart completely. Where information requested is not applicable, so note by using "N /A ". BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE/OCCUPANCY INFORMATION (to be filled out by Plan Checker) OCC. LOAD SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET 000. LOAD OCC. LOAD SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD TOTAL SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD TOTAL OCC. LOAD DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW "X" in box indicates which departments need to review the project. REVIEW COMPLETED OTTO ROSENAU & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION & TESTING 6747 M. L. King Way South • Seattle WA 98118 (206) 725.4600 • Tacoma (206) 627.4477 City of Tukwila Building Division 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Project: Homewood Suites 6925 Southcenter Blvd. PERMIT NUMBERS: Ladies /Gentlemen: We herewith, certify that we have completed the following types of . inspection and testing on this project. To the.best of our knowledge, all work inspected is according to approved plans and specifications. 1. Reinforcing steel 2. Concrete (test cylinders only, in most cases) • 3. Anchor.bolts 4. Field welding • Copies of all reports have been submitted to your office. fax c: Dimensions Development 21 April 1992 00268 62.69 62.70 .62)1 Very truly yours, OTTO ROSENAU & ASSOCIATES, INC. ir• Otto M. Rosenau APR 2 3 1992 PLANN 'l ..1) PT, Proie ¢'i�(„� fr n boo wt. ]� , `C Uvu , Type of Ins oni: �„ U ) Add ess: (09 II 9 Date Called: _ 2 ; c Al Special Instructions: Date Wanted :4 , ZZ 'C7Z m� l a Requester: C� Phone No,: z / ., i Inspector: CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 IFi Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit 2081.431 -3670 ❑ Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: ❑ $30.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. I Recoil No.: Date: Project: ' -- 1/40 m >JCfla ik Type of Inspection: O �btic. t k)Or is n na1 Address: Address: f „ 1 Sovincnt 61 Date Called: L L(' c Special Instructions: 606 A / ' .. Date Wanted: am p.m. Re Phone No.: • INSPECTION ..RECORDt Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188_ UG Approved per applicable codes. (206) 431 - 3670 ❑ Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: ' urc.P svAix4e • ❑ $30.00 R INSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, Yee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. I Recept No.: Date: COMMENTS: ' Type ot'Inspection: p 0 a..... 9 ' V\) erl'n.Aeas Date Called: L i , f 7 ,.... ... Z -1-1 ' 1-5- "r i- i , g Lev 1-; ts rIll V 1 e-rr 1:zxzIKN e._ . Aok VIP p .m. PtidOvIvc ,Z1" C LErrit-- P-A, r» .244.11,__ i 0 6 fs-114 2* A is41-owp,“, i (\) E tt wit. —5) I IN) STri 0,_.0=-1s 12„ \A 1 tit43s STAArP L.0 Pr9- i t4t- - 4-Triz Th %AMU--; - "J. , • ‘-. r - 1 " PI • - - , . -":" ' • e e • : i;,• • 7 ) PAk A) .1".. '.4 e Oa Ai to PIPe" 60,7 • Project: m 666LcA 5 Type ot'Inspection: p 0 a..... Address: 62 q srii T51 vat Date Called: L i , f 7 ,.... ... Special Instrucdons: 1 Date Wanted: ; 1 Aok VIP p .m. Requester: e Ph"N°.: e.pi CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Squthcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 I Inspector: (5 -- INSPECTION ,IIECORD RetaIn a copy with permit ) (p. GO (206) 431-3670 0 Approved per applicable codes, yf Corrections required prior to approval. Date -f /2,6)6)z.- 0 $30.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. r ece0 No.: Date: r \ Protect: t1 O u..)0oa'k-5 Type of Inspection: Tannin C" I nA\ Addressr , g 15 SouwIct r b 1 Date Called; LA _v_ Q Spedal Instructions; 15\ 66 n t`� Date Wanted; am. p.m. Requester: Phone No.: SPECTIONN I Inspector/�� INSPECTION RECORD C . Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. (206) 431 -3670 ❑ Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: ' .015--(4)(-) Dale: + / (6 (P2 ❑ $30.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Recept No.: Dale: Pr ,! ct: / s.i 1. I /. •i . u Ty : • Ins • :ohm; . l ► . , i I le a :• ;_ if --1 z- Sp: •a nstruct ons: , Date Wanted: Requested' a Phone No.: .„, (0 r /, 8.4? \t INSPECTION RECORD= in „) Detain a c with permit INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 [Approved per applicable codes. coa(01 PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 ❑ Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: ' 1 l, Date: q-(3-72— I ❑ $30.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Protect; Hbfn2W036I F} Type of Inspection: f PI ��— Address; C��� ikFraftrer $i Date Called: ‘� ,3 -Q . - Special Instructions: Date Wanted: 3- LI - q am m. a C) P.m. Requester ' a Phone tVo.: Q141- (o li Sc CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 ❑ Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: c.r:l 4ti/voo.4 C (c o b.3- k„a. I r-- INSPECTION C ketain a copy with permit (206) 431 -3670 ❑ Corrections required prior to approval. Date: ❑ $30.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. oe ��� i ." ype o nspect . n: Addres ��" Address: Z � - H to Iled; Instructions: ' ate Wanted: Requester: - None No.: / CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 0 Approved per applicable codes. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit PERMIT NO. (206) 431 -3670 COMMENTS: " �J 62„22.21',7,7 'F,' eicve, e -ede 4.#4 ' r I Inspector: i( Date 3 _ I O Corrections regt/ired prior to approval. O $30.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Recall No.; I Date: Project:k N. 0 a d 51,u , Type of InspectIonIN oti Address: (.001z9 , c"..frit. iiii; Date Called: ( z, _ 0:72 _ 1 ) Special Instructions: 1,44-1" A- . AA % Date Wanted: / i - i-4-1 -9i m. . . Requester: Sw. Fi.: ,.... rrrii* ty INSPECTION RECORD,. - 4 Retain efeopy with permit 0. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 9818 Inspector: Approved per applicable codes. 0 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: 6; A 2 .0:44 ° ■-• PERMIT ty (206) 431-3670 Dale: 0 $30.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. r eceOt No,: Dale: Project: ii , titiy _ mer 9 MW7lEI. - Type of Inspection: (.7 44' Address: (, 0, ... 6 .-: e 45L. Date Called: i 1 q— 9 / Special Instructions: Date Wanted: /— ( e . p.m. Requesterw ad Phone No.: INSPECTION RECORD C Retain a•copy with permit • CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 ITICOMIS (206) 431-3670 Approved per applicable codes. 0 Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: / 7 z . _5 I Inspector: 4 `-t/1 ' e: / 2— zo —cr7 I 0 $30.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. I ReceOt No.: pale: ,MMON11•11•••••■•■•111111 Project / Type of Inspectj6!v, / Atldr = g C C v „/ Cr LJ! �'t Date Called: / p _, / 7_. q 1 Spatial Instructions: (Q W) c''\ Date Wanted: l2 - /)- g / am. p.m. Requester: L k q Phone No,: a 4. / (, q / Approved per applicable codes. r INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPECTION NO: CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 ❑ Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: wasa 04A, l I Inspector: Date: 11-0-11 ❑ $30.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. (206) 431 -3670 'Pct. r at. .4044 0 MAO ,..... , AL.:".• Type of Inectio tieAli.._4_ ... R MIMING • :•. nstruct ons: — — AWN AdIefir o : a a. , . Date Wanted: / 2— /3 Requester: F" No,: ..._ 4 ic n INSPECTION RECORD C Retain a Copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Approved per applicable codes. Matrtrri (206) 431-3670 COMMENTS; 0 Corrections required prior to approval. Date 7 7 --5--1/ 0 $30.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. I H Dale: COMMENTS: • 73 LJ 5 , /Y, bee 2 T i, e ∎ ic.., • T — Y3 , '..ss -es � : e '-?' - 4,1-7e-‹ �./ 'i - o LeM WI 1' — 5 4- �, - "ho.- e / i-r, ''v,' i /- u.. 01/a of i.�r/l �o - - e . - S I /'- 313 e/ S S -GJ r �l C� n7 x •,' 01 41 fi - az-`q vim-. / A - C C 4 (! v i ) C a . / e 4O/)-z t i ' ( 71 1.S 5 Phone '.: 4 1'/ � �" i < A 7 5 i,..or 6 .9 9 rkee'L• .SLG.1 cv; ii AA. A.7.. 4, aJ <r 1r,v,..m. • roe ' 1'IVl /!� � 1i � ype o nspection: 1� ress' /he � : Sp,t't nstructlons: L ,. -f cm ,1 , c�� e� �/ 1 Date anted: z • 0 -q(.dril Requester: ';VM /d� Phone '.: 7:V'4 PawS" „'BT I Inspector: INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 ❑ Approved per applicable codes. 1 Corrections required prior to approval. Date: ❑ $30.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Recept No Project mo t s ii) Type of Inspection: I , �,• ' l 1 15 ,J AAddr of 2 , n „ - Vl l.� INS v ..,0 Date called: t _ Z _ / p eecd Instruct ons: Date Wanted: r fl ( am. p .m. Requester: C—t�v _ n p Ph ne No.: 24 I — (p4 Sot CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 t (206) 431 -3670 lig. Approved per applicable codes. COMMENTS: I Inspect or: `'� �, .... yi�r« vi:...w:. � t �nsi�ti%I^� 5r+''.k'JrY7: +. INSPECTION.. RECORD ft, . Retain a copy with permit &� i3 Cl Corrections required prior to approval. l:11. v(V, ' f7►-► ; Dat ❑ $30.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. PROJECT: cliLI,„,,a/ !, ■ Zvi � , � � PERMIT NO. I --AK ���� SITE ADDRESS: . 4011p j(LY 4 V/1W! �� X1 /11 I L TYPE OF INSPECTION: r �.1 . .►�`..� ' ATE CALLED: (0 " I j DATE WANTED: - � (p a.m. _ SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: w REOUESTER: �Q PHONE NO.: L f 1 (p a — c 6$" INSPECTION RESULTS /COMMENTS: INSPECTOR: ( ..12.---- DATE! ) ( -16, _q I - '. Chit a'S1`vL•spidi i'ULIagiti ofj{Jiag2NfZ:fillYA 4l' try '.ifet}'uS'.�.a.'r.J3ek;5rr: �l °a ":;!_.� . n. i`L.�A`Y+C1tl:x CY^S!'iPibtNY1.'w ..lt>t`Jr�•SR INSPECTION RECORD CITY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Division Phone: (206) 431 -3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 CITY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Division Phone: (206) 431 -3670 kf. L rt'.: „�UT12S `:tv, ;vA. fv. 1;F(3: 601 :nr.r. *. t ?+:. ?'stt w2 INSPECTION RECORD -V 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 PERMIT NO. ( ..(rp PROJECT: r t5 ), D(i SITE ADDRESS: k0 • a--5 lab 1 . ` ALA SO. • ,,J DATE CALLED: 4 — • AIM. TYPE OF INSPECTION: ��� (��.., a •— ,�� • .Ott —A�'Y1 ' ATE WANTED: -- q ,s" SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: REQUESTER: C� PHONE NO.: c — 1.0LS,W INSPECTION RESULTS /COMMENTS: ) IusDECTAR! ..- -' V L,J2— DATE! it, CITY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Division Phone: (206) 431 -3670 kf. L rt'.: „�UT12S `:tv, ;vA. fv. 1;F(3: 601 :nr.r. *. t ?+:. ?'stt w2 INSPECTION RECORD -V 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 PROJECT: /..,49 , _ <, 60 c)r, <, ,i 6 PERMIT NO. C SITE ADDRESS: b q 25 f, _ r • 4 4., Q /��,( DATE CALLED: 2 ` 1 TYPE OF INSPECTION: � p �� r i // /Vt. , DATE WANTED: 7/ avp SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: REQUESTER: 6' " ' Z 'CJ)) PHONE NO.: INSPECTION RESULTS /COMMENTS: .. _ o• .f /.i / -, / nATP• * ..7 i i �,. iucPIICTAR: it'd _ D ..- f / AAA A. -% ItC3L4g5.1 ' Ac¢tYdE:.�' 4Ok''lit, ` P '.Si!'' d, '!i a : ,el*ttr aknw S .. CITY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Division Phone: (206) 431 -3670 ±'2 "..1 x..vy'..M1:70 ? . , :fir: ,:'�:+`�Crti'd!"'iat INSPECTION RECORD I� 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 PROJECT: mQ W co 6u j-re._ PERMIT NO. (o (0-1 SITE ADDRESS: (c S Sot. r f..Q�' J n DATE CALLED: -b�C -Q\ TYPE OF INSPECTION: 5\Q( 1,y ()1\ 1\10 I 1-19 DATE WANTED: '0,3 -q I p SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: REQUESTER: - 07(2 fairl PHONE NO.: (al.( ( - L INSPECTION RESULTS /C f � �, i'�� �, T� �L� p / INSPECTOR: ,6, �f� ,e1s/ )� DATE: 9_2- ; .-G1/ CITY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Division Phone: (206) 431 -3670 .r rehlwriib,:atfol n7-4. Pais .:1*, a tMokar44ralittfirc it:peat∎.tin.vvAn ti w INSPECTION RECORD \/ 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 PROJECT: Me l A Y D CO PERMIT NO. Lo L(�� i SITE ADDRESS: c� 1- `� . L - L_ DATE CALLED: � -' TYPE OF INSPECTION: c,`L' Q_A_Gu ..k NjCc _CP DATE WANTED: ' ( - 10 - q \ ' ' m ' SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: E. . ,(,, f)ifv-v\ REQUESTER: C"se--'- v&( of J PHONE NO.: 07 1 -. ( INSPECTION RESULTS /COMMENTS: No pF-- ( 17vA 4 INSPECTOR: -14/ DATE: q //D --q, CITY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Division Phone: (206) 431 -3670 ,�tu�n.:xtir:.r wsa.xmrsxmmsr�r V.•pCS:.�OtYU 00:4.!%lir'GR:6 +IIkXa't!. ^, �4KNsf+ rN, rar: x.,rxmy.tt.�rrarcnaefxa:xtuu•.0 INSPECTIO ��' RECORD 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 PROJECT:- u -o-e PERMIT NO. lP 2 SITE ADDRESS: DATE CALLED: TYPE OF INSPECTION: - f crt.C/1� Ska- DATE WANTED: `7 - 5 -1 f � _ SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: A ✓ ".4lq REQUESTER: �f PHONE NO.: INSPECTION RESULTS /COMMENTS: c . daeor*.... --- rL k 1-"6 - k& ' ... /'_ c — . __ alL CI 4 I CITY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Division Phone: (206) 431 -3670 INSPECTION RECORD ba7 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwlla Washington 98188 PROJECT: '�y1Q/f,(� ') I - I PERMIT NO. 7 74 SITE ADDRESS: / ,r •TI,c. A d / / / / _■, ,i,,_,, .±, /re DATE CALLED: 1 — DATE WANTED: s .- F or • • TYPE OF INSPECTION: i J,1 a jr J;v* SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: REQUESTER: a / PHONE NO.: 2 / / s INSPECTION RESULTS /COMMENTS: INSPECTOR: (` ---"" DATE: 5'' 'CI ��: 11 y drl n , �' �, 1�2+. �?: ((.i:S' ciriiYl. �,�„rK��xxt��4'u!!d�a. MCA. wt. hKeii'#S ° .i "• •,� ".:JaS. Y+� < CITY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Division Phone: (206) 431 -3670 INSPECTION RECORD 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 CITY OF TUKWILA Building Department 6300 S �'�•enter Boulev rd Tukwila,,, 98188 (206) 431 -3670 a Type of Inspection .. Site Address Requestor Special Instructions L - .- Inspection Results / / omr!ents: Inspector PERMIT # 2-CPI Date Date Wanted /5-01 -- Project Phone # Date o'(0'9( f3a ,t;) Type of Inspection",--6,1 MeeA.? Site Address � Q' i r 7 7,-, 47 cr. Requestor Special Instructions ,g$AVI+►V'fat1N,'w` titTemR'im,motmmiexi:uvouwA. �1 CITY OF WIIA Buildin artment 6300'Sou :,nter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 v Insppeection Res /Comments: ABC ,Q� /_ 1 *.4./ Inspector Z2f_ !"0621.dtxexkat•Apaz..w 1611H aii■;nuh;!WAVIV:. r&a1 A*12 11.04 . !.rw:a.o4, rsw: INSPECTION RECORD PERMIT # 044 ? Date Date Wanted /�-- 6 '-!o a.m. P r o j e c t . Phone # f 7 -157 c v Pte* ?"7.1 -- 4 4 - 4e, So fi► lug � � -�- Date //-6 1 �� idgrit TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL X CAME TO SEE YOU . N111CALI. AGAIN : WANTS TO SEE YOU ' • iusk .• ' — - , ' RETURNED YOUR CALL - • SPECIAL ATTENTION , l(i MESE AGE ) -130 FOR 1) ISL DATE I TI ME q 0 M Git al a 0 , -- jaccpri ConruOnrs PHONE - tot-m(1 AREA CODE NUMBER ME SSAGE unci 7u 11111if 1(1 SIGNED 1 14, LITHO IN U.S.A. TOPS 9 FORM woes 00 or EXTENSION Sprinklers: Fire Alarm: Hood & Duct: Halon: Monitor: Pre -Fire: Permits: C City of Tukwila FIRE DEPARTMENT 444 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 -7661 (206) 575 -4404 Project Name Address /-215- TUKWILA FIRE DEPARTMENT FINAL APPROVAL FORM _ Retain current inspection schedule Needs shift inspection • Authorized Signature L .r4 Approved without correction notice Approved with correction notice issued a :y,cr.;xa.fi4-r:•tra;.n�ra �•r: ;f:N'L'.�: Suite Date Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor Control No. Permit Ner. � ' 2 r , FINALAPP.FRM T.F.D." Form F.P. 85 J R':A'' ,... �: art• UMW SPECEICRTIONS SUE NEM GIVE NEN1231011 Tor 0110IOS 2i4 1001 IMF i-3 MINTON ISOM MR 3 ININC tc 4 IF ST M I- 5 OFF PA tt13- SPLICE NOSE: Oft portal past 10 11ew are lacatad at 1/3 MI pima lent* +I- Ir at 01~ awl et Me Mel Ind Mate* P-Yawt and paaala. 2x6 BF - CONS .10 111100 -25(43 501 CS" C-2.5:4.3015i C-525.1 -WS Stake 1/4 JON NINE 1111111INVILIE 1 11110310111111162T01181r FILE 110.: 11111-1/10.5-4/0 R-10-24-91 W w11O/31 Var 4.3 /113191 NM - SEC.: 15-1 KS. en 6N SIED.: 266310 C-2.914.3 C-10.6 C-2.50.30 S1 - ** WOODINVELE LUMBER INC. - WWWC#56 - - P.O.BOX 287 WOODINVILLEONA 98072 12 C-56.115i 5.0017 C-2.50.3161 11121111121* L las111242~1111•21••••adrooml000llmoollooma 2. filiwassamiesseassarss therfamell~04110smealas ItlentamoOdIreoonoloonvomotoomoo 0000maloosoo onolis loomprOlulmoo roma ... lomO. mos lOo 0.110.0 one goolad 11d oOgoor of - abiastwa. Oirumiliareseresmilm 1. Slo 0000ll smolbiloomor poloomaloWOLIniog folloosomonollniowelorfoo looftelOool2o• oof•••••= 11. Comooms ago or mow of ono 011111111•0 MO IIIIIMMOF Wes OftsioNa froose.oloomoo•loolofaOr o0 anemone' infolloolloamoOlsooLIPOomsiMoOoloossomoogisoolodo Ofloollon 14.1* looloiolo•II~Onelloome.211311r.a mop et loabloilliffloIgoommoossoOno /WAS IIPAN Ormimm of losel Mame secummerele rams Mims 4. 4, • osougoon•tfloogsos theaapirei[Le of Ile essoeftoeuroomt S Oimgp mmanesmariMas Mee illama remammorstemmenmeM 11 mOrmis mooramip al all WWII feflow. swats rims - r c 0 = tor rwonases u sle I =Ma as =Om Moes Mamas Myr Was morsOlosallom000 pre CONN OWL 4 r a.......sisw-.8.1..wift.dameebf,4 rm. Ilettete cm MI Mil 11 Theemmitemssms Swoon Par a Nacres ow as peat - or Mr emqms1M.Orsigarm a spa omMour is rami MA lasIlt yrs PO ea TPI susie mum mum T -1246 0 5130 V 1- T 2- -601 2■ U50 V 2■ T II 559 3 W 4- 5.- LEFT .• 713 Rico - BMWS MEN OEN/1M (SO. 00 JOINT 1 i.: 1.531V JOINt 7 I.19 Ot / 1.04 W / Inc. 1 :0 t%) JAN 07 '92 10 : 21 AM MARTIN I ND ENG MARTIN INDU8T141Bi8 P.O. BOX 128 DATE: 1/7/92 PAGE 1 OF 4 PAGE(S) TO: NAME: Dwane Griffin FIRM: City of Tukwila FAX NUMBER: 206 -431 -3665 FROM: Ken Cakebread FAX TRANSMITTED BY: Linda Puller IF COPY IS ILLEGIBLE OR INCOMPLETE, PLEASE CALL OUR ENGINEERING OFFICE (PHONE NUMBER 205 - 740 -5250) FOR A RETRANSMISSION OF FAX. COMMENTS: F A X T R A N S M I S S I O N ENCINEERINC DEPARTMENT 1120 NORTH ROYAL AVENUE FLORENCE, AL 35631 TELEPHONE NUMBER: (205) 740 -5250 FAX NUMBER: (205) 740 -5265 F.O. SOX 12! 301 EAST TENNESSEE ST. FLORENCE, AL 35531 AC2054767.0330 BUSINESS NOUNS FAX 2054767.0330 EXTENSION 152 AFTER NOUNS FAX 7!7.0941 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF MARTIN INDUSTRIES, INC., FLORENCE, ALABAMA (e)? -VSO - 6 4 /, -.70 ^`7 1 . JAN 07 '92 10!21AM MARTIN IND ENG January 7, 1992 C ' y INDUSTRIES Mr. Dwane Griffin Building Official City of Tukwila 6300 South Center Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Griffin: FAX: 206- 431 -3665 Subject: Construction and Installation of Special Chimney Shields Re: December 18, 1991, Letter to Touchstone Building Specialties, Inc. Enclosed is a copy of the above- referenced letter which I believe you have received from Touchstone Building Specialties regarding specially fabricated shields which we recommended be installed on the Homewood Suite Project, 6925 South Center Boulevard, Tukwila WA. To further clarify the actual design and installation requirements, I have provided a drawing which details the location and instructions on hoer to determine the shield sizes, both height and width. The similar testing referred to in paragraph four of the above - referenced letter would be the testing of firestop thimbles such as our model MT16, which is installed at zero clearance to combustibles. This incorporates a cylindrical tube concentric with the chimney pipe. The combustible framing is only 3/4 inch from the chimney where it passes through the ceiling framing. The cylinder- shaped shield incorporated is spaced 1/2 inch away from the outer chimney pipe and effectively shields the combustible framing at 3/4 -inch clearance to the chimney. The MT16 firestop thimble is UL listed for applications of reduced clearances from 2 inches down to 3/4 inch. Should you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, MARTIN INDUSTRIES, INC. Kerfneth D. Cakebread Senior Engineer - Fireplaces (205) 740 -5256 KDC/ Iwp Enclosures cc: Mr. Tim Baisch Touchstone Building Specialties, Inc. P.O. BOX 128 301 EAST TENNESSEE ST. FLORENCE, AL 35631 AC 205 -787 -0330 P.2 a N z POT S"/ Dr t// FA/ 1 4,f : L'o Nsreucl% c TA)S;(4-LLX rJ oFSP iA . Sir / .0/9 /71/Ai �6dd>1 7E11 j7 _ i L4U671(1 5N18b MMS7'SE !ANlr ExrouGA TO EXTElub 147fs.L 4 " EEyo,.It AMY Amor off` eogyeaS77EC£ i64 7a1R /A GS LESS 7. MAJ .7 ''CtE.lir v r►CE" F .7 774r G'p/.t,.vE yPiPE, �3) A no. SNIEL D (a) PIP' 2" CL.EMw3CE raw' CcoluSes176tES h.rop s# /F4d M4Sf 6fmlD 4 ''BEt6M TIE /b /NT AT 4n' ! THE ariteAuce /5 LE5S TNAN Z r Tu L eu 7ff8G6S. JAN 07 '92 10:29AM MARTIN IND ENG P.4 C MARTIN miousrAIEs December 18, 1991 Touchstone Building Specialties, Inc. 8635 154th Avenue, N.E. Redmond, WA 98052 Attention Mr. Stuart • Monson Dear Stuart: Subject: Air Space Clearance on Martin "S" Series Chimney System Re:, Homewood Suite Project (Sacon Constructors, Inc.) 6925 South Center Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Sincerely, KDC /lwp Kdnneth D. Cakebread Senior Engineer - Fireplaces (205) 740 -5256 P.O. BOX 128 301 EAST TENNESSEE ST. FAX: 206- 881 -0839 As we discussed yesterday, the faxed illustrations you sent us showing combustible clearances to the "S" series chimney system of 1 inch must be addressed by placing shielding described as follows: Using a minimum of 26 -gauge (.019) galvanized sheet metal, fabricate shields with two sides formed to provide a f -inch air space. The shields may be formed in a semicircle and attached directly to the outer chimney pipe with screws, or secured to the type "X" fire code gypsum board material next to the chimney. Construct the shields large enough so that when they are installed, the width of the shield extends past the chimney centerline at least 4 inches either side and the length covers any clearance to combustibles less than 2 inches. Based on testing performed in our test labs in recent years, use of shields similar to that specified above has allowed reduction of combustible clearances down to 3/4 -inch air space with acceptable results based on the Standard for Factory -Built Fireplaces, UL 127. Shields constructed and installed as specified above in the Homewood Suite Project will provide a safe and acceptable installation. Should you have any additional questions concerning the above, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. FLORENCE. AL 35831 AC 205.797.0330 J • . • .„'••• • "'";;" " • • • • • • , .„ . . .• • • •%.L.; ' • ;"; ;•,> •. ' • ." • , ' • • . • s . s . ' ' cr • c•• , ", •". ..• • 7: • , .!, 1 ' 7.: - • • ‘,,` , - SIGN, A� )1:' 1 - Ci;', i t )1; FAX 206 401 3665 Tali; Nu( •OR vi.y un , un.vina DEVELOPER'S PROJECT WARRANTY REQUEST FORM SECTION 1- (to be filled cielopor l sariTh .re by ; 1 NAME OF DEVELOPMENT: ifO/K C24)(20 5� ( re S DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS: 6 9.2 Sov L�t�. NAME: . ( del. GAS (004 ' )'C.QM 0� ADDRESS: 6F2 S so e.)' e(CUj`C <C CITY/STA - MOP 7aJK w c c eri- CASH ASSIGNMENT SA ALL BE REFUNDED BY MAILING TO (pl.:as prim) 08 1 " - - ED( ::a y 1 rrti AL'S YVER:, TPAS ARE DESc;R(@EDI: S ea r *C64 b As the owner, or authorized agent of the owner, I hereby submit cash or cash equivalent in the amount of $_.. 57.010 0 C9 ($150% of value to complutr work described above) and attach supporting documontatiiin rc• value of work. I will have this work carried out and cell for a final Inspection by this date: ( -J .9Z.3 r Q _), or risk having the City use those funds to carry out the work with their own contractor or In -house manperhor. It I tail to carry out the work, I hereby aut - rize the City to go ont, Lilo property to carry out completion 01 Ina above deficiencies. I further agree to corn. to all work listed a ye presto requesting inspection and release of these funds. SIGNED; hoof Ay r"tly. >ti) ' .V •." 'i«'S• !.� ?r H!M4✓ : M`� ?� 1!MN!MOfM +w••.w.y . *um Hew,.. soo CASH (5 CASH EQUIVALENT c. rY Rcu lP1 NO t O , 4 DEVELOPER'S REPRESENTATIVE: "G�7�[it��l:�fpAiitortir» It�d�'! CASH CITY CHECK NO, THIS FUND IS AUTH oKA DEPARTMENT HEAD; .H w !<3 .(tO #I�f con A tfAvetup. }, 72 HOUR NOTI"` , nON FOR INSPECTION AND Pr. CEASE OF FUNDS send copies to: - Developer - Finance Department - Pormit Coordinator, DOD AUTHORIZED BY: Upon completion through Section 2, Finance personnel shall RECEIVED BY: 7/4 (Mt PERMIT NO,: ' 7- 2 7 . TEL. NO. ;ZOG-.24- - ‘ 7 8 (88 A' j ,. r 1NT: CASH EOUIVAI ENT - LETTER AU * • IZING RELEASE IlL,. ,..ASED THIS DATE: RELEASED DEPOSITED THIS DATE: 4- (G l 2_ WINO E OO2 E ACCEPTED. EPT All work identified In Section 1 of this !ctm h now been completed and returned to department which authorizer •varrarrty. I hereby request inspection and release of my cash/c.,sh equivalent. DATE: I have reviewed tha mf.xtuA &Air,* or t fo d It m000 pt a bl : , :w t: Gtor e, • authorize the releas a cash assignment. DEPARTMENT: vlO , FINANCE DEPT. Upon completion of entire form, Finance personnel shall send copies to: - Developer - Finance Department - Permit Coordinator, DCD pi 2vrrio 4 ❑ Developer And Manager Of 10 West Trimble Road San Jose, CA 95131 (408) 456 -0156 (408) 456-0158 (1 Iecopler) HOMEOOD SUITES L :.;.::.4. >:. t and _:: CCOUNT f:N.I� •- 000/341.500 >v: :_ :t A'MOt1NT` € < Es $ . Maps Publications Printing/Duplication Services (copies) 000/341.600 Sign Permit 000/322.100 kG3Cc r cJa%ti( Y ' CcO. 38C. ?ae SO© FERMITwY:J!llM _ 4:':+ PAID BY: cash Rrcheck # ?87 ii:tti:.,.• %:::: n::�::i4i:A \i:p4Y�ti: :. PLANNING DIVISION CUSTOMER CHARGE TRANSMITTAL City of Tukwila— Dept. of Community Development 6300 SouthcenterBoulevard, Tukwila, Washington 98188 DATE 1-! l 6 Z l EMPLOYEES NAME: v" v CUSTOMER 3)r Nt tsJ to !� LsYGT.ap}-1 CSC l (206) 431 -3680 SACON - DIMENSION CONTRACTORS P. O. BOX 795 NATCHITOCHES, LOUISIANA 71457 MEETING MEMO To: Homewood Suites B.P. File (6267 -6271) From:. Vernon Dmetsu Department of Community Development Date: March 23, 1992 RE: Meeting on 3/23/92 to Resolve Required Fire Lane. 1. Attending: Jim Ford, Homewood Suites /John McFarland, City Admin. /Nick Olivas, Assist. Fire Chief /Vernon Umetsu, D.C.D. 2. Issue: Homewood needs to provide 4 more ft. of all weather surface for emergency vehicle deployment generally along the river side of Bldgs. C5 and E5. 3. Ford proposes to provide 2 ft. landward of Bldg. C5 and 2 ft. riverward of Bldg. E5. Further clarification shows that this new area would be the same type of material used for the existing adjacent jogging path. 4. Umetsu has doubts about having 2 ft. riverward of Bldg. E5, but Ford assures him that it is there and Touma Engineers will submit drawings to demonstrate this. 5. Olivas states that this surface must be designed for fire equipment deployment per Tukwila Fire Dept. standards. Ford . gets clarification and agrees. 6. Umetsu agrees that the proposed revision can be done and still satisfy Zoning requirements, subject to Public Works and Fire approval. 7. Ford agrees to have Touma Engineers submit revisions which show a plan view of the affected area and typical landward and riverward changes as building permit revisions. 8. Umetsu clarifies to Ford that these proposed revisions must be approved by Public Works, Fire and D.C.D. before incorporation into the approved plan set. Mc PO- Cdt GI VA" S" re FiCii45VC LI MEETING MEMO To: Homewood Suites B.P. File (6267 -6271) From: Vernon Umetsu Department of Community Development V C C qC Pk/44A / GI VA C Date: March 23, 1992 RE: Meeting on 3/23/92 to Resolve Required Fire Lane. 1. Attending: Jim Ford, Homewood Suites /John McFarland, City Admin. /Nick Olivas, Assist. Fire Chief /Vernon Umetsu, D.C.D. 2. Issue: Homewood needs to provide 4 more ft. of all weather surface for emergency vehicle deployment generally along the river side of Bldgs. C5 and E5. 3. Ford proposes to provide 2 ft. landward of Bldg. C5 and 2 ft. riverward of Bldg. E5. Further clarification shows that this new area would be the same type of material used for the existing adjacent jogging path. 4. Umetsu has doubts about having 2 ft. riverward of Bldg. E5, but Ford assures him that it is there and Touma Engineers will submit drawings to demonstrate this. 5. Olivas states that this surface must be designed for fire equipment deployment per Tukwila Fire Dept. standards. Ford gets clarification and agrees. 6. Umetsu agrees that the proposed revision can be done and still satisfy Zoning requirements, subject to Public Works and Fire approval. 7. Ford agrees to have Touma Engineers submit revisions which show a plan view of the affected area and typical landward and riverward changes as building permit revisions. 8. Umetsu clarifies to Ford that these proposed revisions must be approved by Public Works, Fire and D.C.D. before incorporation into the approved plan set. * * REVISION SUBMITTAL * * DATE /'+ 7F PROJECT NAME YON( 67410 0 Sul `7 - 64 - S" ADDRESS CONTACT PERSON Ed ! ' ` 114 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER PERMIT NUMBER 6o2.0 7-- 1 (If previously issued) PLAN CHECK NUMBER SHEET NUMBER(S) L ' 1 CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. PHONE RECEIVED CITY C W TUKWILA MAR 4 1992 PERMIT CENTER TYPE OF REVISION: ft/`Cb S Ci+ -PC' p L � . A Leal b y g PLAtO /A(G • ( e~_— /'�- 2/4/F.2_) SUBMITTED TO: kikto -or &Co 6/g/m Flom : Ficto. Oc?, a Ea Z../ r &O21 ook lrloo o 14 8 5 5 elk/ /x/92 ) e C 4 •JL P ©y7 art ° `f i v I 91(04., Pszrin , v1 ta 41j 41.6 k111 ��� d burg, 01/45 ax ati ilLir e I ,,f,-cog " lc1 Hari >/ £ot Gall, S t u me 7 r5 oL f o 6 Y'h_ Opel_ / .0 HO SSU I TES I Il 1\IF.WI)C)I) "UIT'Es • ',EATTI 6945 SUUTT II Iiti'I EIL BLVD. T I/KWII. \, \VA 98188 201- 433.811OU Y,1 Xi 206- 433.S"'4 March 2, 1992 Mr. Duane Griffin City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Griffin: We have reached the final phases of construction for the Homewood Suites and would like to move our pre- opening staff into a section of the Lodge area. (see attached site plan) The pre- opening team will be overseeing the final details of the project and working closely with the project manager, Jerald Earl to assure a smooth opening. My staff currently consists of: General Manager - Kari Jonassen Operations Manager - Kathi Stover Cheif Engineer - Clay Dunn Director of Sales - Julie Hesse Account Managers - Brian Fleet Susan Zaffiro Each member of my staff is covered by health insurance if an . incident were to occur on site. The sales team will be off property during the days, but use the office to store files. The rest of the staff will be on site to oversee all areas of construction. I understand your concerns regarding having the public on site and would like to assure you no tours or entertaining will be done until the site has been approved for such action. If you have any further questions please contact me :.at 433 -8000. Your cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, 01044 Kari Jon ssen. General Manager KJ /ks EM [1AR 021992 CITY OF 'f UKWILA► PLANNING DEPT. H )MI:W00I) SUITES 11OMEWOOD SUITES 6935 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVAr TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 206.4338000 206.433.8994 (FAX) KARI JONASSEN GENERAL MANAGER l 0 7..2 trw ttw' N 6373 44 f L a L...... t� t \ 4_ BUILDING B4 - JJ. =7 t/2 t 61 -3 r /4" 34 (larr5 I I� A's E'S ¢ D'S BUILDING B3 4r -t0 t/2- r 31-J 3/b 0 • .tJY.. [ � t t.xw *s — ..r itwor BUILDING 82 rlr f +617 - BUILDING Al ' ,,x -d 6375'411 r t663J' M • -- { . or BUILDING VI" !}prtl BU rc A I (D U n 1+5 i 3 13'. S G, ' r( : . isr ..r J BUILDING, E5 .4 7J /4 -u ,unit „tt 13 w &Tars [ Nw mot . .r BUILDING C5 t34 -3 ►/2" r WY' vr• i I u,c (tit Sep i s pZ F 142 �Ca.t rs -- 2 JUrae.. -t Tics; !06 • OMR t MAR 0 2 1992 CITY OF I PLANNING DEPT. Un '{' ea's* ar• f el Pk" fi'op1r'f Q fc.ce J 0� January 20, 1992 Ed McHugh, Architect 2661 Bel -Red Road Suite 202 Bellevue, WA 98008 RE: Homewood Suites. Dear Ed, This letter is confirm our earlier discussions on two proposed design modifications: 1. Relandscaping of river bank along the northern eroded section. Dale Roper's concept is fine, but must be revised such that no landscaping is proposed below the river's 100 yr. flood elevation without an emphasis on withstanding flood flows. A tree which is ripped out by flood waters not only becomes a potential downstream dam, but may structurally undermine the bank as its roots damage bank armoring. A revised landscape plan should be submitted to Planning and Fisheries for approval. . Use of sod in all areas currently proposed covers is herewith approved. Please feel free to contact me at 431 -3684 if I help. Sincerely, City of f Ti1kWIlB 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner cc: Pace /Fraser /file hmwd1.20 Phone: (206) 433.1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 433-1833 John W. Rants, Mayor for other ground can be of further January 7, 1992 Mr. Dwane Griffin Building Official City of Tukwila 6300 South Center Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Griffin: Subject: Construction and Installation of Special Chimney Shields Re: December 18, 1991, Letter to Touchstone Building Specialties, Inc. Enclosed is a copy of the above- referenced letter which I believe you have received from Touchstone Building Specialties regarding specially fabricated shields which we recommended be installed on the Homewood Suite Project, 6925 South Center Boulevard, Tukwila WA. To further clarify the actual design and installation requirements, I have provided a drawing which details the location and instructions on how to determine the shield sizes, both height and width. The similar testing referred to in paragraph four of the above- referenced letter would be the testing of firestop thimbles such as our model MT16, which is installed at zero clearance to combustibles. This incorporates a cylindrical tube concentric with the chimney pipe. The combustible framing is only 3/4 inch from the chimney where it passes through the ceiling. framing. The cylinder- shaped shield incorporated is spaced 1/2 inch away from the outer chimney pipe and effectively shields the combustible framing at 3/4 -inch clearance to the chimney. The MT16 firestop thimble is UI, listed for applications of reduced clearances from 2 inches down to 3/4 inch. Should you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, IV1ARTI INDUSTRIES MARTIN INDUSTRIES, INC, Ken eth D. Cakebread Senior Engineer - Fireplaces (205) 740-5256 KDC /lwp Enclosures cc: Mr. Tim Baisch Touchstone Building Specialties, Inc. P.O. BOX 128 301 EAST TENNESSEE ST. FAX: 206- 431 -3665 ull ETTA 13 JAN fJO1992j CITY OF 1 UKUU1LA PLANNING DEPT.. FLORENCE, AL 35831 AC 205. 787 -0330 r✓ela 5:527 • 5 /. 5ta 1N/cy 3Nl Qn'oi3g 9 71.Y3 in3/!!S>0taw! 53 asopw° - ltvlod 3787 .37J az rimy ( 537d14/1 /i-a/Lt/77 2 Q9 / z i/4•WifA(vg91 rail/ 6/0 • «/' 7 "2dSJG fey.V7 15r moo .Jrrd'L /Y9 3/CL 3)reltrAf'37;7_ t rvbia. 577 /3-71-0 3TJ�i/gtYr� �0 1r/ad A Nfr 7 2 2;. $ • Prl31i3 01 (/9norY3 .9rvP7 32 P737115 do ))L91Yl /Y 9(9..c327 ae /Y.A. - /2'M .mac/ /d 1 Q73 //i'S�a'nzRs 9ntQdar 9 3 5 49 /undo 53I20S „S.. - 713 , v7_71/ r MARTIN INDUSTRIES December.l8; 1991 Touchstone Building Specialties, Inc. 8635 154th Avenue, N,E. Redmond, WA 98052 Attention Mr. Stuart•Monson Sincerely, Kdnneth D. Cakebread Senior Engineer - Fireplaces (205) 740 -5256 KDC /lwp P.O. BOX 128 301 EAST TENNESSEE ST. ' Dear Stuart: Subject: Air Space Clearance on Martin "S" Series Chimney System Re:, Homewood Suite Project (Sacon Constructors, Inc.) 6925 South Center Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 FAX: 206 - 881 -0839 As we discussed yesterday, the faxed illustrations you sent us showing combustible clearances to the "S" series chimney system of 1 inch must be addressed by placing shielding described as follows: Using a minimum of 26 -gauge (.019) galvanized sheet metal, fabricate shields with two sides formed to provide a i -inch air space. The shields may be formed in a semicircle and attached directly to the outer chimney pipe with screws, or secured to the. type "X" fire code gypsum board material next to the chimney. Construct the shields large enough so that when they are installed, the width of the shield extends past the chimney centerline at least 4 inches either side and the, length covers any clearance to combustibles less than 2 inches. Based on testing performed in our test labs in recent years, use of shields similar to that specified above has allowed reduction of combustible clearances down to 3/4 -inch air space with acceptable results based on the .Standard for Factory -Built Fireplaces, UL 127. Shields constructed and installed as specified above in the Homewood Suite Project will provide a safe and acceptable installation. Should you have any additional questions concerning the above, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. FLORENCE, AL 35631 AC 205- 767 -0330 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTNCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 PHONE N (2061433.1800 December 19, 1991 Mr. Edward McHugh 2661 Bel -Red Rd. Suite 202 Bellevue, WA 98008 RE: Homewood Suites Lodge Building Type of Construction (Your letter, dated 12 /18/91) Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor Dear Mr. McHugh, Based on the information contained in your above referenced letter, your request to change the construction classi- fication of the Lodge Building from Type V One -Hour to Type V One -Hour with fire sprinkler substitution for one -hour construction is approved. The cover sheet of the approved plans for this project should be annotated to reflect this change, and a copy of this correspondence should become a permanent part of the file. DECEMBER 18, 1991 MR. DUANE GRIFFIN, BUILDING OFFICIAL CITY OF TUKWILA, DEPT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MINOLTA BUILDING 6300 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WA. 98188 RE: HOMEWOOD SUITES, 6915 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. SUB: LODGE BUILDING & TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. DEAR MR. GRIFFIN, I AM SENDING THIS LETTER TO YOU AT THE REQUEST OF BOB BENEDICTO IN YOUR DEPARTMENT FOR YOUR APPROVAL. ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS AND THE BUILDING PERMIT, THE LODGE BUILDING IS CLASSIFIED AS A TYPE V 1HR STRUCTURE. THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION OF THE LODGE IS B2 AND THE AREA OF THE BUILDING IS APPROXIMATELY SIX THOUSAND SQUARE FEET. ALTHOUGH NOT A REQUIREMENT, THE LODGE IS ALSO FULLY FIRE SPRINKLERED THE SAME AS THE REST OF THE PROJECT. THE PLANS AND DETAILS INDICATE BOTH ONE LAYER OF DRYWALL AND TWO LAYERS OF DRYWALL APPLIED TO THE BOTTOM OF THE TRUSSES OR CEILING, SO IT IS NOT CLEAR AS TO WHAT IS TO BE PROVIDED. WITH THE ABOVE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION, WE HEREIN ARE REQUESTING THE LODGE BUILDING BE RECLASSIFIED FROM A TYPE V 1HR TO TYPE V 1HR WITH FIRE SPRINKLER SUBSTITUTION FOR 1 HR AS PERMITTED IN UBC SEC. 508, "FIRE— RESISTIVE SUBSTITUTION ". IF YOUR DEPARTMENT WERE TO AGREE WITH THIS REQUEST IT SHOULD ALLOW US TO INSTALL ONE LAYER OF GYPSUM BOARD TO THE BOTTOM OF TRUSSES OR CEILING RESULTING IN TIME AND COST SAVINGS. WE LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR REPLY, IF YOU NEED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE DON'T HESITATE TO CALL. WARMEST REGARDS, E WAR McHUGH, ARCHITECT CC: JOHN DAVIES, DIMENSIONS DEVELOPMENT JERALD EARL, SACON CONSTRUCTION BOB BENEDICTO, CITY OF TUKWILA (206) 883 1 200 2661 Bel-Red Rd. Suite 202 Bellevue Washington 98008 r• QQ q� LEgd1vdfd smoHkgh JOB NUMBER: 91 -183 OTTO R SENAU & CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION & TESTING 6747 M. L. King Way South • Seattle, WA 98118 (206) 725.4600 • Tacoma 627.4477 • Fax (206) 723.2221 PROJECT: Homewood Suites DATE: . . 6 August 1991 I inspected placement of Stoneway Sand & Gravel Mix Number: 3752 DATE CAST 8 -6 -91 8 -6 -91 8 -6 -91 DATE BROKEN 8 -13 -91 9 -3 -91 9 -3 -91 cc: Owner 1— Architect /Eng. Engineer 1— Contractor 1 —Bldg. Dept. Batch Plant CONCRETE REPORT REPORT NUMBER: 009 Concrete was placed via pump Batch weights per cubic yard: 350 1950 # 7/8" a,gg. 65 #Fly Ash, oz. per 100# of cemen Cast specimens # 9 A —D at 10 Cast specimens # at Cast specimens # at Weather: partly cloudy 66 CYLINDERS ARRIVED IN LAB AND /OR REMARKS: INSPECTOR: W. Hansen , cubic yards of 3.7 sack, 2, 500 psi concrete from , in the following areas: perimeter footings at lodge building. CAST CYLINDERS ONLY PER CONTRACTORS REQUEST and it was vibrated internally. Slump range 4" # Type I / II cement, # 3 oz. WRA t. cubic yards with a 4 cubic yards with a cubic yards with a Concrete Temperature: 8 -7 -91 COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS ON 6" x 12" CYLINDERS (AREA: 28.3 SQ. IN.) AGE IN SPECIMEN ULT. STRENGTH DAYS NUMBER WEIGHT IN LBS 7 9 —A 30 #0. oz. 28 9 —B 29 #14 oz. 28 9 —C 30 #0 oz. ASScL IATES, INC. PERMIT NUMBER: 6267 " slump. Del. ticket # 321821 " slump. Del. ticket # " slump. Del.,ticket # 65 74,500 119,000 116,000 1490 # sand, per 100# of cement. STRENGTH LBS /SQ. IN. 2635 4209 4103 SEPo 9 1991 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. OTTO ROSENAU & ASSOCIATES, INC. `� '�r' 44 I , i -ill- ;?...4v2z.:r'e JOB NUMBER: 91 -183. OTTO RC.CSENAU & ASSCCIATES, INC. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION & TESTING 6747 M. L. King Way South • Seattle, WA 98118 (206) 725.4600 • Tacoma 627.4477 • Fax (206) 723.2221 PROJECT: Homewood Suites CONCRETE REPORT REPORT NUMBER: 012 PERMIT NUMBER: 6267 DATE: 8 -26 -91 INSPECTOR: R. Marks Imislej>leet ilmsaesf' cubic yards ofi " 5 sack, 2500 Stoneway , in the following areas: floor slabs A -1. Mix Number: psi concrete from Concrete was placed via pump and it was vibrated internally. Slump range 5i" Batch weights per cubic yard: 470 # Type I /II cement, 1580 # sand, 1850 # 7/8" agg . # , # oz. per 100# of cement. oz. per 100# of cement. Cast specimens # 12A -C at 5 cubic yards with a 4i " slump. Del. ticket A 324397 Cast specimens # at cubic yards with a " slump. Del. ticket ¢ Cast specimens # at cubic yards with a " slump. Del, ticket a.. Weather: clear, 65 ° F Concrete Temperature: CYLINDERS ARRIVED IN LAB AND /OR REMARKS; 8 -27 -91 , cast cylinders only. COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS ON 6" x 12" CYLINDERS (AREA: 28.3 SQ. IN.) DATE DATE AGE IN SPECIMEN ULT. STRENGTH STRENGTH CAST BROKEN DAYS NUMBER WEIGHT IN LBS LBS /SQ. IN. 8 -26 -91 9 -3 -91 8 12 -A ' 29#14 oz. 98,000 3466 8 -26 -91 9 -23 -91 28 12 -B 29#12 oz. 121,000 4280 8 -26 -91 9 -23 -91 28 12 -C 30#0 oz. 118,000 4174 cc: Owner 1-Contractor 1- Architect 1 -Bldg. Dept. Engineer Batch Plant I - Ifgagr SEP CITY OP TU►cvVILA PLANNING DEPT. OTT ROSENAU & ASSOCIAT INC. /.'; 20,,C:Sl'al0 ` OTTO ROSENAU & ASSOCIA +ES, INC. 6747 M. L. KING WAY SOUTH, SEATTLE; ) WA 98118 725-4600 PROJECT: Homewood Suites INSPECTOR AND DATE D. Newman 9 -25 -91 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REPORT PERMIT NUMBER:6267, 6268, 6269, 6270, 6271 ADDRESS: 6925 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila JOB NUMBER: 91 -183 INSPECTOR'S REMARKS R. Marks Inspected and approved the resteel and forms in concrete floor slab and grade 8 -26 -91 beams. Resteel is placed in compliance with plans and specifications. Chimney foundation steel has been revised by structural engineer.(Revision sketches not available.) Sketches provided later and steel appeared to be in accordance. Resteel is grade 60 (Grade 40 specified), as specified, from Salmon Bay Steel and Cascade Mills. G. Moe Inspected and approved the resteel and forms for foundation stem walls and 8-27-91 elevator pit walls, Building #3. Resteel is grade 60, as specified, from Salmon Bay Steel. Visually inspected and approved field welding of stairway headers & beams in building #C5, E.5, & 8. Multi pass welds included connections of channels & tube steel flares to flat corners in connections of stair stringers to to TS beams. E7018 electrodes were used. WABO certified welder RW Douvier # expires 4/1/92. This inspection covers field welds. only. OTTO RCSENAU & ASSCri:IATES, INC. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION & TESTING 6747 M. L. King Way South • Seattle, WA 98118 (206) 725.4600 • Tacoma 627.4477 • Fax (206) 7232221 CONCRETE REPORT JOB NUMBER: 91 -183 REPORT NUMBER: 012 PROJECT: Homewood Suites DATE: 8 -26 -91 limpteteelvinemeromf Stoneway Mix Number: cc: Owner 1- Architect Engineer • 1- Contractor 1- Bldg. Dept. Batch Plant PERMIT NUMBER: 6267 INSPECTOR: R. Marks cubic yards of 5 sack, 2500 , in the following areas: floor slabs A -1. Concrete was placed via pump and it was vibrated internally. Slump range 5 i" Batch weights per cubic yard: 470 Type I/ II cement, 1580 #sand, 1850 # 7/8" agg . # , # oz. per 100# of cement. oz. per 100# of cement. Cast specimens # 12A -C at 5 cubic yards with a 4 " slump. Del. ticket # 324397 Cast specimens # at cubic yards with a " slump. Del. ticket # Cast specimens # at cubic yards with a " slump. Del. ticket # Weather: clear, 65 ° F Concrete Temperature: CYLINDERS ARRIVED IN LAB AND /OR REMARKS: 8 -27 -91 , cast cylinders only. COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS ON 6" x 12" CYLINDERS (AREA: 28.3 SO. IN.) psi concrete from DATE DATE AGE IN SPECIMEN ULT. STRENGTH STRENGTH CAST BROKEN DAYS NUMBER WEIGHT IN LBS LBS /SO. IN. 8 -26 -91 9 -3 -91 8 12 -A 29#14 oz. 98,000 ' 3466 • ROSENAU & ASSOCIA, INC. OTTO ROSENAU & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6747 M. L. KING WAY SOUTH, SEATTLE, WA 98118 725.4600 INSPECTOR AND DATE R. Marks 8 -26 -91 'G. Moe PROJECT: Homewood Suites ADDRESS: 6925 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REPORT PERMIT NUMBER:6267, 6268, 6269,6270, 6271 JOB NUMBER: 91 -183 INSPECTOR'S REMARKS Inspected and approved the resteel and forms in concrete floor slab and grade beams. Resteel is placed in compliance with plans and specifications. Chimney .foundation steel has been revised by structural engineer.(Revision sketches not available.) Sketches provided later and steel appeared to be in accordance. Resteel is grade 60 (Grade 40 specified), as specified, from Salmon Bay Steel and Cascade Mills. • Inspected and approved the resteel and forms for foundation stem walls and elevator pit walls, Building #3. Resteel is grade. 60, as specified, from Salmon Bay Steel. cc: Owner 1— Architect Engineer OTTO R(3ENAU & ASS( iIATES, INC. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION & TESTING 6747 M. L. King Way South • Seattle, WA 98118 (206) 725.4600 • Tacoma 6274477 • Fax (206) 723.2221 JOB NUMBER: 91 -183 PROJECT: Homewood Suites DATE: 8 -8 -91 1— Contractor 1— Bldg. Dept. Batch Plant CONCRETE REPORT REPORT NUMBER: 010 INSPECTOR: D. Spicer PERMIT NUMBER: 6267 •Stoneway , in the following areas: Resteel and cylinders only. Mix Number: 3752 Concrete was placed via pump . _. Batch weights per cubic yard: # Type cement, # sand, # # # oz. per 100# of cement. oz. per 100# of cement. Cast specimens # 10 A —C at 3 cubic yards with a . 4 " slump. Del. ticket # 322191 Cast specimens # at cubic yards with a " slump. Del. ticket # Cast specimens # at cubic yards with a " slump. Del. ticket # Weather: Sunny, partly cloudy 75 F Concrete Temperature: 58 ° F CYLINDERS ARRIVED IN LAB AND /OR REMARKS: 8 -9 -91 COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS ON 6" x 12" CYLINDERS (AREA: 28.3 SG. IN.) DATE DATE AGE IN SPECIMEN ULT. STRENGTH STRENGTH CAST BROKEN DAYS NUMBER WEIGHT IN LBS LBS /SO. IN. 8 -8 -91 8 -15 -91 7 10 —A 29 #8 oz. 72,000 8 -8 -91 9 -5 -91 28 10 —B 29 #6 oz. 105,000 8 -8 -91 9 -5 -91 28 10 —C 29 #8 oz. 107,000 --- 1 ) \ --- Ceit.ff . P3 -2, 1 1\ S\.EP.1i Gov ur• c u c.,,.„A OTTO RO.SENAU & ASSOCIATES, INC. /''i 7/ 2000 psi concrete from 2546 3714 3784 t CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 September 3, 1991 Ed McHugh, Architect 2661 Bel -Red Road Suite 202 Bellevue, Washington 98008 PHONE # /2061433.1800 Goy L. l''HDusru, dlatior RE: Various Project Revisions for Homewood Suites Development. Dear Ed, This letter is to record several conversations I have had with Jerald Earl (SACON), Tom Touma ( Touma Engineering), and Dale Roper (The Roper Company) on four issues between August 16th and 22nd. 1. River Bank Stabilization Bank erosion last winter will require revisions to the approved bank stabilization plan. All revisions to these plans must be approved by various Tukwila departments, Dept. of Ecology (Shorelands Div.) (DOE) and the Dept. of Fisheries (DOF). You are responsible for acquiring all necessary approvals for the revisions. Tukwila revisions must be submitted with a "Revision Submittal" form (attached) to the Permit Coordinator. Revisions to the building permit require 2 copies while revisions to the utility permit require 6 copies. DOF will not allow re- establishment of the river bank as it was before erosion (Kreitman, DOF, 8/16/91). Therefore any proposed bank stabilization must be from the existing water line and ordinary high water line. Earl understands that the permitted construction period ends on September 15, 1991 per DOF requirements. Tukwila is willing to allow the construction of existing buildings as originally approved even if the structures encroach into the newly defined (no build) River Environment, since such a situation would arise due to a natural event and not caused by the applicant. Any such building would become a legally non - conforming structure and no further encroachment would normally be allowed. DOE concurs (Bales, 8/22/91). Planning cannot allow a reduction of the approved landscape area between building and trail unless Board of Architectural Review approval is granted. If the required 2:1 riverbank slope would result in reduced landscaping, then other slope ratios should be engineered for review. I have discussed several options with Tom Touma on this issue and briefed Phil Fraser as well. 2. Revised Bay Window Roofs The proposed shed roofs are not acceptable substitutes for the approved roofs. The shed roofs bear no relationship in form, line or proportion to other building roof elements. Planning will consider other bay roof revisions which clearly reflect these design elements at a level at least equal to that approved. 3. Landscape Revisions The proposed landscape plan revisions submitted by Dale Roper on 8/21 are not approved except that the south and west ground cover may be changed from ivy to sod in order to provide biofiltration swales. Shrubs may be grouped in order to facilitate swales, while still providing accent and depth to the landscape design per discussions at the B.A.R. hearing. Shrub groupings shall be based on discrete areas north and south of the access sidewalk from building C5. 4. Proposed Satellite Dishes The proposed satellite dishes should be located in interior areas between buildings where they are screened from perimeter view. I have discussed various possible sites with Earl. Specific sites and screening measures shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. Please contact me at 431 -3684 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Vernon Umetsu, Assoc. anner cc: Jerald Earl/ Pace /Beeler/ Bales / Kreitman /Building ° >fi1 /B.A.R. file. ;: .,. file:hmwd8.22 AUGUST 9, 1991 MR. JACK PACE, SENIOR PLANNER CITY OF TUKWILA, DEPT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MINOLTA BUILDING 6300 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WA. 98188 RE: HOMEWOOD SUITES, 6915 SOUTHCENTER BLVD., LODGE BUILDING DEAR MR. PACE I WANT TO THANK YOU AND YOUR STAFF FOR YOUR QUICK, POSITIVE RESPONSE AND APPROVAL OF OUR PROPOSED ALTERNATE DESIGN FOR BUILDING #1, THE LODGE BUILDING, ON OUR PROJECT. AS YOU KNOW WE ARE PRESENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND BECAUSE OF THIS WE HAVE REALLY APPRECIATED YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION AND REVIEW OF THE MINOR DESIGN REVISIONS WHICH WILL ALWAYS OCCUR ON SUCH A COMPLEX PROJECT. THE OWNER, HOWEVER, AFTER CONSIDERING ALL THE MANY OTHER ASPECTS OF THE SUBSTITUTION WITH THE ALTERNATE BUILDING, HAS DECIDED NOT TO CHANGE FROM THE ORIGINAL APPROVED DESIGN. WARMEST REGARDS, EDWARD McHUGH, ARCHITECT CC; JIM FORD, DIMENSIONS DEVELOPMENT JOHN DAVIES, DIMENSIONS DEVELOPMENT BOB BENEDICTO, CITY OF TUKWILA (206) 883 1200 2661 Bel-Red Rd. Suite 202 Bellevue Washington 98008 EdwardA McHugh Architects vp (1 AUG1 9 1991. CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 * * REVISION SUBMITTAL DATE ,1UL1 199 PROJECT NAME Mdi,► r: Le SG i yi S ADDRESS 025 .1. CALI)15 h I t ? CONTACT PERSON O PHONE zq / -- M' 9 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER tit) Wle-O tG•/f AQ/5 66eirg- l 1 trS (2270 6Z6$ (Da tin PERMIT NUMBER 6 z it & 2 (o 9 (If previously issued) PLAN CHECK NUMBER /310 10 ?O.-/3�, 9/9-1353 90-137 TYPE OF REVISION: DEL6771 -1 G *L- "AAA P1P.19 -ti.) S G■/ tau 1 Gin /1,) 6 2 a G -4" E- i N.ais 0 / . 'VJ 7 6i Lt4g 5 C1%1 R'uM 1.6 rs reisP, ANAJA4 4.Pea,tr1 *miuJL'd f 4 1 SHEET NUMBER(S) r "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions SUBMITTED TO: Seg 'ITY of TU�KW JUL 11991 PERMIT CENTER FILE COPY I understand That the Plan Check approwsts ;Are id of plans does not authorize the 001,10cm adopted code or ordinance. f:: :t:dripr t :t cor;troc'tor's copy of approved plans acknowt. By Dee Pertnit No (P? IP1 �' (Pay • 1 2 3 e 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 to 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 2e 27 29 30 3 32 33 34 36 36 37 31 30 40 di 42 43 44 •a CoMPUred •r DATED _ CQ << 61 4 .1.,, r . � •• EaIl 1 CA I tst;h a Its Inc. CHECKED IT DATED 1.•/1•111M IM I I.{ /Y. 14 '..../ /4 1 11 11 1 1,,,, , f1/4.1.4 01,100 . �1�� �'' 4. PROJECT NO. - - SHrET .L_. OF % , PROJECT S1•2 o�. >� S' T> . SULJECT +�2.ha 121 Tv. 01 64. •Slur'a QE1tC-... PMa - ATTN: MMQ �"1 f-v/z_d ■+: lb? cPvqB , ko - -tx Ei L.. easy& arcs. p PrVwa D to..S l.edI � d00 ems(- 144zPoPr o� v NC a1�, L5d°L4 s1ac.Ja "i'ii•Ac'r' `To-NE I Mos ' o PrrtiE 8y -L r N63 kJEC bew CJWI e M SSA ,_- N • G F 1.00 .uepaLT Te) gar %S -v o s vQ 90k Q OtSw0 ems, Tom= 4.4 o cry:, nJS D - 3el-k0 , N a,9- 400#--1 g-. p.11 T g. t a -���- 6v tm-C, NL% 0o Noi N P iers, «44 co - rte ea-Aw Rr0 s4-40.-Pt S S +Y 4.5(W fr k? F-AYA- 4u, 1-th rA.4 A N Mu. v f- fit Pew-c .rr 14- .a 015 Arr !.. AZal" 'TQ 'r ex. t7 Ni PANd /4 AVa. F IQ• 6 1 t.a { "S 1 . - J% I* SI..M • - ibcD:G F-c2i-1 NO./NI PQer. P- - n Pesio. P F 0o..1 P ort 1 04i a My sr 04 1►.rP Pw a4T al" Pow P. afril.to J POft NtS • 00,4I Fs) SPool' Qkrr►J' 4o. $110 -ey 1 6 t -t..∎ knre Tr> z. �- - p J e 60 60 Ivs ..t, 1e10 7ti Hick w7 *J c. Off- 64'r4 m o .3 d gikt, rJ f 0 rrtei. DOW NS.Pd4T `A NC& 6'STrIV\ 2212 REGISTERED ^Cf{ Edward A, McNuch Jr, STATE Or W1or;I:WTON 7 'Its itel,ndwav SA Cs3NSS FE:Z °i:1:"f 2068839294 2!- 1 .a- cA;riP6 , PI-6 T 0%1 N> ..,. CITY OF TUKWILA APPROVED ju , 1991 BUILD NG ISIC)N CITY OF TUKWILA .IUI. 1 IbbI PERMIT CENTER DATE 7 l 1 PROJECT NAME H '�- So -$ ADDRESS Co� 4 Sa UST T.'f CONTACT PERSON W IA/IQ—kJ PHONE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER E-D 1 r ci --(-UG 1-4 PERMIT NUMBER '' _ (If previously issued) PLAN CHECK NUMBER cy 0 II 3 Q" go-13% CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 * * REVISION SUBMITTAL * * 3- Ito 0 (D'D (o (o'ca TYPEE REVISION: N= V l SG SLAQ 6-074.-r) s'— Co 111 5 c- T° G(2 A-u.J L.S 0 A- U (Jt''i"S t SHEET NUMBER(S) PevJ S f4E £TS 5 1.1 5' I • b 51.1 51 • to 1 51-11 "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. Ite.‘d SID ES. ?S 5 3.. t S3 , 1 - . GIM.R\I.NM JUN 0 71991 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. SUBM111 TO: } : O( c r ) L-O(p c QLA. s 1.5 hr' 30.00 = 45. wick 4 1 46.0' to _ I •-ct I Recopt- - Q tooq June 5, 1991 JE /dw City of Tukwila 6200 Southcentcr Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 d . i cerely, � 4 fatte_ Jerald Earl Sacon Constructors, Inc, • SACON CONSTRUCTORS, INC. General Contractors / Construction Managers RE: Building Permits for Homewood Suites fr U I.I Cc, /JUN ©5 199` l � C/TY u/- I UtcvvtLA Dear Denise: The building permits for Homewood Suites were pulled on October l l , 1990. At that time the underground utilities were being installed. Due to the above normal rainfall and soil condition the work was stopped to avoid further cost overruns, Now that better weather has arrived we are gearing up to proceed with construction. We request our building permits be renewed, Thank you for your help in this matter. 27442 CAL,LE ARROYO SAN MAN CAPIS'I KM,Q, CA $)2675. 714/661•1020. Jerald Earl Sacon Consutructors, Inc. 6925 Southcenter BL Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Permits for Homewood Suites Extension Dear Jerald: An extension has been granted for 180 days from June 5th to commence construction on your project. This is the only extension that will be granted for your project, if work is not commenced then it will expire and become null and void and new permits will need to be applied for. If you have any questions about the extension or expiration of your permits please do not hesitate to call. of Denise. Millar. Permit Coordinator City of. Tukwila cc: Permit Files Building Official Sincerely, RE: gjt.ierauaob Su l .S PERSON CONTACTED: CirtVDitc ace6r75 `U PERSON CALLING: Ce7 4 L7) DATE: J ..2 INFORMATION ITEMS: TELEPHONE MEMO o f: c Co•t .44- /,reea t. ?XL-4 ff- � r r 3 2-60, c2,-,0 ,2 di ( (� P X26 - C.27 •1, . -.2 0 -- SI 1 1.1 014 1 4 . S 04 c''i14 C El hl 'S T May 20, 1991 City of Tukwila 6300 S. Center Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attn: Phil Fraser Public Works Department Dear Mr, Fraser: Thank you, Sincerely. e Jerald Earl Sacon Constructors, inc. JE /dw cc: Dale Baker SACON CONS'E RY;C'I'ORS, I NC. General Contractors / Construction Managers Now that good weather has arrived. Sacon Constructors, Inc, is starting to resume the underground 'utilities. We are requesting an 'extension of our 'underground utilities permits. 55S I'n° 55 S s55- P43 ssS- ?'*9J s5 5- ./5 a ds- 9 wt a ore - 90 PL,4- P 9 -4 0 F'_ .' r_y 1 .. ' Cl 1 April 2, 1991 Dimension Development, Inc. 401 Keyser Avenue Natchitoches, Louisiana 71457 Attention: Mr. Jim Ford Subject: Gentlemen: Homewood Suites Hotel Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington Earth Consultants Inc. (AYg1Y'I1104111 I'.11g1111Y 1S. (i14,I1). 4lS & IGl\'It1)111114111W ticklillsts RECEIVED APR 05 1991 TuKwiLA PUBLIC WORKS 1805.136th Place N.E., Suite 101, Bellevue, Washington 98005 222 E. 26th Street, Suite 101, Tacoma, Washington 984119998 Bellevue (206) 643.3780 Seattle (206) 464.1584 FAX (206) 746.0860 Tacoma (206) 272.6608 E-4343-2 In accordance the request of Sacon Constructors, the excavation of four test pits were observed by our field representative on March 22, 1991. The test pits were located at the northwest edge of building B and the middle of the north side of building A. The pits were excavated in order to provide information regarding the subsurface soil moisture conditions. A daily field report covering the work performed in the field was previously transmitted. The test pits were excavated to a maximum depth of four feet. Brown silty gravel with sand (Unified Classification GM) was encountered to a depth of four feet. The soil exposed at four feet was observed to consist of a dense, gray silty sand with gravel (Unified Classification SM). Field and laboratory tests indicate moisture contents ranging from 10.4 percent to 16.2 percent, with the higher values from the gray silty sand encountered at a depth of four feet. It is our understanding that the foundation subgrade is to be at a depth of four feet. Maximum density and optimum moisture tests performed in accordance with ASTM D1557 on samples obtained in the field indicate optimum moisture contents of 10.8 percent for the gray silty sand and 8.0 percent for the brown silty gravel. This indicates the existing on -site soils are over the optimum moisture content, but appear to he in a condition that will allow earthwork operations if care is exercised in protecting excavations and backfill soil from rainfall. Given the above, following are our comments and recommendations should construction commence at this time. 1. It should be noted that the information summarized above is from limited areas and may not be representative of the overall site conditions. 2. Project scheduling should be such that earthwork is performed during periods of dry weather. Foundation excavations that otherwise would not require overexcavation will likely require some Dimension Development, Inc. April 2, 1991 remedial overexcavation if exposed to rainfall. In addition, any excavated soil that is to be used as backfill should be protected from rainfall. 3. Based on the information presented above, it appears likely that excavations for utilities that extend below four feet will encounter soils that are marginal for use as backfill in their present condition due to high moisture contents. Soil that cannot be used as backfill due to moisture conditions can be dried back during periods of dry weather to moisture contents that allow adequate compaction. Should you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. Very truly yours, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. 9;4-4 Kyle R. Campbell, P.E. Project ngineer eodore J. Schep P , P.E. Director of Geotechnical Services KRC/TJS /clh /ah (64343.2.L041 cc address: Sacon Constructors, Inc. 27442 Calle Arroyo San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Earth Consultants, Inc, cc: Mr. Paul Hansen; Sacon Constructors, Inc. Mr. Greg Villanueva, City of Tukwila Public Works Department E- 4343 -2 Page 2 January 24, 1991 Dewayne Griffin City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Subject: Letter re: Green River as a Methane Gas Barrier Dear Mr. Griffin: I understand the City of Tukwila has on file a letter from the King County Health Department stating they accept the Green River as a Methane Gas Barrier. We would like to have a copy of that letter for our records. Please fax a copy of the letter to (206) 241 -6787. I may be reached by telephone at (206) 241- 6489. Thank you. Sincerely, JE /dw etuti2.. erald Earl Sacon Constructors SACON CONSTRUCTORS, INC. General Contractors /Construction Managers '16 , 3 rct � d L - vr I Copy G 1 k , 'h CO . l e�Il ' S , ' M i n v i Jed' i S �vt ef,?ed,'oe- barrier as Y11i'rcri;or i5 (A-1-1achkcf, �� �t(O . ilff 711 /f e was 514191v/WW, 1:2 us ct,.s fAr/ '41_ sq i'f . I Harr ill 4" C , a. t I � ,.e.,, ` yd Q.cf . � a r, ► ► . /a, eicig 647 0 le 74 27442 CALLE ARROYO SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, C 675 714/661.1020 J AN 28 1991 PI. A" .. trw rt, pr, IEMORMigg.a August 14, 1989 101 Mike plant FROM; Steve Curry y G RS: ,State Farm Insurance Project fleaIfle•King Cow* Department of Public rieeltb 1 �'" Y 9 4 , 0 01)1 60- 41 bud Nicats, MAL MMsA, Director In regard to the State Farm Insurance building near the abandoned Tukwila land - fill, we were informed that the building is to be built on the opposite side of the river from the landfill. This being the case, the Health Department has no obligation to lass restrictive methane gas protection for the building. The river is an effective barrier to gas migration. If you have any questions, please contact Steve Curry at 296 -4830. SCsvm 'CC: Tukwila Building Department eroylr ummuuM i club , so* $01 smith Tower Mut11., wy■Ontton Nl04 ,1500 11 ,$$ L 7/4/tw-- iozo CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 9211811 TO: 43744,,C000/1 FROM: DATE: 1-1- SUBJECT: '808 BENEDICTO, Senior Pan. CMookM MEMORANDUM PHONE N I206J 433.2800 1678 431-36 31-3076 Gary L. V4NONS•N, .Mayor .A , '4 �e.—._4,L'ii• . 44/1. . L ./ 1. t. , /i ._ / . ✓ . • _ .. . W/1 .:J , i } , /L/ 1.$ , / .�1 I L I / AIL e December 27, 1990 Dimension Development, Inc. 401 Keyser Avenue Natchitoches, LA 71457 Attention: Mr. John Davies Subject: Proposed Homewood Suites Hotel Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington Gentlemen: Earth Consultants Inc. Gcotcchnictl Itnginccrs. Geologists tZ I nvironnkvttnl Scientists We have prepared this letter to summarize the primary subjects discussed during the meeting at the office of Touma Engineers on December 20, 1990. 1. The on -site soils may be used for compacted fill provided they are in a compactible condition. The soils are moisture- sensitive and, due to the recent rains and snow, are not suitable for use as fill in their present condition. Should stabilization of the soils in the present condition be attempted, it is our recommendation to use cement stabilization. Typically, a three to five percent mixture of cement is required. Should this option be chosen, it is recommended that tests be performed in order to determine the optimum mixture for the on -site soils. 2. The soil conditions in the foundation excavations at the time they are made will determine the need for overexcavation. In general, if the exposed soils can provide a stable base for foundation support, remedial measures will not be needed. If the exposed soils do not provide a stable base, overexcavation will be required. The limits of overexcavation must be determined at the time of construction; however, overexcavation for foundation support generally consists of an excavation to a depth below the bottom of the foundation equal to one -half the width of the foundation. 3. It is our understanding that governmental authorities have accepted the Green River as a methane barrier for the site with regard to the old dump site on the east side of the river. DEC 3 ? 1990 1805 •136th Place N.E., Suite 101, Bellevue, Washington 98005• -• ` - -• 222 E. 26th Street, Suite 101, Tacoma, Washington 98411.9998 Bellevue (206) 6433780 Seattle (206) 464.1584 FAX (206) 746.0860 Tacoma (206) 272.6608 E- 4343 -2 Dimension Development, Inc. December 27, 1990 Th eodore . J. Schdper, P.E. Project Manager KRC /TJS /sar (04343.2,L04] Should you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. cc: . Mr. Paul Hansen; Sacon Constructors, Inc. Mr.. Dave Larson; City of Tukwila Mr. Jim Ford; Dimension Development L7122b- 22L /i7ob s vs1/4-wc 22s - 2 g sc. . p Y 0201 / - 4/ L, °�r,�',�:� -;,r n-, A.. CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTIICENTBR BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, IVASIIINGTON 98188 moo: 4-47-'4+A-0006( Itut4 ..Qo ‹rtann: -kite - Pat 71oU90 q6. &0 '6* -Darted( le -- 6, cL u c ( ,,et Zittul 43Le-YA 7keite fieeig c/a-Pi"; a t a ' 6114 6 * et gal .//liel4,J)ea-e4, do-roe-tau ale*4-4 6./tee44.40-07 aderad .4a.tilee -217,1dveu/te • isem ocia 06444- ay ate,' &abed )46zze,ie " - Mee4feerli -erW _Art 41e:i . 10Z1 MEMORANDUM PHONE #12061 011800 Gary L. Van1)asen, Mayor Gentlemen: November 13, 1990 Dimension Development, Inc. 401 Keyser Avenue Natchitoches, LA 71457 Attention: Mr. John Davies Subject: Proposed Homewood Suites Hotel Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington References: Earth Consultants Inc. 1. Geotechnical Engineering Study E -4343, dated: June 20, 1989 2. Geotechnical Engineering Study E- 3007 -2, dated: November 2, 1987 Dimitri Demopulos, Inc. Architects Homewood Suites Hotel Project Plans C Earth Consultants Inc. Geo technical Engineers, Geologists & Environmental Scientists t Eorig Lvov 1 ,71990 t (17<-1 bepr 343 -2 We have prepared this letter to present information regarding the methane barrier recommended in the our referen d eport dated June 20, 1989. It is our understanding that the recommended methane barrier Wrnot to by constructed. A raised floor system with crawl space vents will be used in lieu of the barrier all but one of the structures. Building Al will be slab -on -grade and will have no protection from methane. The barrier was originally recommended as a precaution against methane migration from the old landfill located east of the Homewood Suites site, across the Green River. Review of available documentation indicates that concentrations of up to 33 percent methane gas have been detected in borings at the landfill. Our referenced geotechnical engineering study (GES) dated November 2, 1987, which covered a portion of the Homewood Suites site, reported detection of low concentrations of methane gas (40 to 350 parts per million), which was attributed to decaying organic material. Our most recent GES dated June 20, 1989 did not detect methane gas. King County Board of Health Rules and Regulations Number 8, Part VI, Section 3 requires that all enclosed structures to be built within one thousand (1,000) feet of the nearest property line of an active or former landfill site be protected from potential methane gas migration. The regulation further states that the method for insuring protection of a structure from methane 1805 136th Place N.E., Suite 101, Bellevue, Washington 98005 222 E. 26th Street, Suite 101, Tacoma, Washington 98411.9998 Bellevue (206) 643.3780 Seattle (206) 464.1584 FAX (206) 746.0860 Tacoma (206) 272.6608 Dimension Development, Inc. November 13, 1990 shall be addressed in a report submitted by a licensed civil engineer to the local building department for approval. The structures of the proposed Homewood Suites Hotel are within the one thousand (1,000) foot limit. Given the above information, and the fact that our recommendations for the methane barrier will not be used, the risk, however slight, associated with the effects of potential methane migration must be accepted by the owner of the property. Should you have any questions, or if we can be of further assistance, please call. Very truly yours, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. Theodore J. S epper, P.E. Project Manager KRC /TJS /sar 104343 - 2.1021 cc: Mr. Paul Hansen; Sacon Constructors, Inc. Mr. Dave Larson; City of Tukwila Mr. Jim Ford; Dimension Development Earth . Consultants; in Kyle. R. Campbell, P.E. Project Engineer NAME ADDRESS & ZIP PHONE lb<L C • it ti-(-- lea5 -136111 PEA« N!c Sutra 10; G. et-t E/uB 1-.JA C.04.-3Zbv iv� �.v�il1 tei ✓111 14-4i * i a ul u�tLt /]Hiyi i �r� 5�- ¢+/D D miry c ruK' 1I/+ N3/ 31 79 VOK UPG1TAG r e ¥?(- (Q rp _'nNl Ihi,..s / 7 ,- pl .r '� �.. c ly 4 $.14 e y 7 31.3 .3)4/ -3..).)C (7/w / 6 . 6 /- /O?c' 1 v ID .17277 v7440. C``- /(Q. ARriowo .fty 44 sr trJo (4. 926 7S 4i Tu /. 62A444, (-14._ aqi - to <4,0 P 1 4 -9 c,-47 -( T 4. _,/ 4 kv . 1 r., ?fr DATE: //--• PROJECr: 1.✓ L! c ;LEg CITY OF TUKWILA PRE -CON ATTENDANCE SIGN UP SHEET r -. From: Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner Department of Community Development Date: November 6, 1990 RE: Conflicting designs. MEMORANDUM To: Homewood Suites /Fort Dent II /State Farm Files 1. On Friday, 11/2/90 at 4:30, Greg Villanueva brought a problem to my attention: the Homewood Suites access road was under construction and several State Farm trees and sod would be removed. Catch basins were already in and the road location was fixed. A quick review project review also showed that the Ft. Dent access point seemed to be incorrectly located and other design conflicts . (Ro ll elsv4T'e' ) 2. On Monday, GV scheduled a meeting for Tuesday at 11:00 A.M. 3. The following summarizes the Planning items covered. a. Ft. Dent II parking area drainage uses catch basins instead of sheet flows. This will result in a 4 ft. deep biofiltration ditch instead of a 1 ft. deep ditch with gradual slopes. This perimeter design does not allow EAR required landscaping nor the overall perimeter design. It must be redesigned to provide for . a shallow swale. b. Homewood Suites is responsible for all restoration for access road construction. Homewood representatives agreed that they would be responsible for landscaping the 9 foot perimeter north of the access road which lies on State Farm property. Homewood will coordinate with State Farm on an acceptable design and submit it to me for review and approval. c. Two State Farm trees, sod and irrigation lines were removed by Homewood for road construction. Homewood will be responsible for replanting or replacement. I noted that the trees were to have been originally installed outside of the 40 ft. easement and not need to be moved (per landscape plan). State Farm and Homewood were clearly informed that there should be 10 ft. of landscaping between State Farm parking and back of sidewalk to be planted per approved plans. State Farm will be checking to see what irrigation lines need to be installed. 4 A side issue is that Ft. Dent III landscaping adjacent to Homewood Suites may be in conflict with the Homewood Suites Design. Ft. Dent landscape architects were previously told to coordinate landscaping between both projects. A later phone conversation with the landscape architect disclosed that she had not seen the Homewood Suites design. Both Homewood Suites (Jim Ford), and Ft. Dent developer and landscape architect have been informed. This will be resolved during the BAR review. K(D , c€,/ _ (FT T1Z�d-1E) �� 7�ifry" ,17oi!e d G14-KGe" 6 fr CifIVDSroffe C (OM ekJO ob' ? c-A e • 5stk / b o C<.�e,rr d: .71 g Er v/ e-La &ztit`b 1� M � �z�-t T error 02 C.° G-rlt4 7e0" &Oa rig/ S 10,1 4.4 Mahan &DeSa 'Ivo CONSULTING ENGINEERS October 8, 1990 Sincerely, Cry /tal Kolke CLK:5 cc: Dimitri Demopulos Architects 7277 Regency Square Blvd, Suite Houston, Texas 77036 J. Clark Johnson Engineers 1418 112th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 Duane Griffin City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Regarding: 90 -T -07 (Homewood Suites Hotel) 1411 Fourth Avenue Bldg. Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 624-8150 Dear Mr. Griffin, We have received information on the proposed project and have reviewed it for compliance with the structural portions of the 1988 Edition of the Uniform Building. Code. We have no additional comments. Enclosed are the drawings, calculations, and project manuals for your use. Mahan &DeSalvo October 3, 1990 Duane Griffin City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Regarding: 90 -T -07 (Homewood Suites Hotel) Dear Mr. Griffin, We have received information on the proposed project and have reviewed it for compliance with the structural portions of the 1988 Edition of the Uniform Building Code. Our comments follow. Structural 1. Floor sheathing with a 40/20 panel index number would be inadequate at Building #1 floor framing, which is spaced at 24" o.c. Refer to Sheet S4.2. 2. Section 2/S3.4; how is shear transferred to the party wall? Are the trusses intended to transfer shear like Section 1/53.4? Clarify drawings and show adequacy. 3. Section 16/S3.4; pressure treat the 4x10 beam. 4. Call out the size of foundation vents and include how often they occur to assure compliance to Section 2516(c). 5. All items containing structural information must be sealed by the engineer of record. Refer to Sheet A1.2. Please have the applicant respond to the above comments in itemized letter form and resubmit two copies of revised drawings and one copy of calculations, as required. All status inquires are to be directed to our receptionist. Sincerely, CONSULTING ENGINEERS Cry tal Kolke CLK:4 cc: Dimitri Demopulos Architects 7277 Regency Square Blvd, Suite 100 Houston, Texas 77036 J. Clark Johnson Engineers 1418 112th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 1411 Fourth Avenue Bldg. Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 624 -8150 • �. 9 o- f -rhr go-eta 1I � 1 1 Mahan &DeSalvo CONSULTING ENGINEERS September 21, 1990 Duane Griffin City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Regarding: 90 -T -07 (Homewood Suites Hotel) 1411 Fourth Avenue Bldg. Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 624.8150 Dear Mr. Griffin, We have received information on the proposed project and have reviewed it for compliance with the structural portions of the 1988 Edition of the Uniform Building Code. Our comments follow. Structural The following comments apply to all building types unless specifically noted otherwise. 1. Have the soils engineer address the issue regarding the location of interior footings relative to grade, as shown at the raised floor on Sheet S3.4. 2. Footing drains can not be located directly under the footings. Revise the drawings so that adequate bearing can be accomplished at footings, by placing the drains around the perimeter footings, not underneath them. 3. Provide details on the drawings for the connection of the stair treads to the stringers. Show adequacy with calculations. 4. Section 2/51.6 is referenced at the square columns at decks on various foundation plans. This detail does not exist. Provide calculations and details showing the adequacy of the foundation at this location. 5. Section 11/S3.4; the wood stud pony wall must transfer shear to the foundation. Provide sheathing on this wall or use some other analyzed method of shear transfer. 6. Since Hem -Fir studs are an option, shear wall values must be reduced for Group III Species per Table 25 -K -1, footnote 1. All connections must be reduced as well. Provide calculations checking the adequacy of all critical conditions and revise the values on the shear wall schedule, as necessary. 7. The Structural Notes, Sheet S3.1, call out the option of using Hem -Fir Standard Grade for studs. The calculations check the adequacy of Hem -Fir #2 studs; therefore, the Structural Notes should be revised. 8. Clarify clearance at corner installation for HPAHD22 holdowns per requirements in the Simpson Catalog. _ -- k SEP 24199Q September 21, 1990 City of Tukwila Re: 90 -T -07 Page Two 9. Calculation pages 6 and 7 call out 2- MSTI60 strap ties at each end at each wall for the 3rd /2nd floor for Wall B, and 2- HPAHD22 holdowns at the foundation. Unit E, Sheet S2.9, only calls out one strap and one holdown at wall B. Unit A doesn't show any holdowns. Please get the drawings and calculations coordinated. Check all similar conditions. 10. Page 15 of the calculations evaluates Unit E as similar to Unit C and compares the shear forces acting along walls A, B & C. The 9 feet with 84 plf has been considered in the ratio increase, however, the 19 feet with 155 plf has not. This 19 feet was only 105 plf for Unit E. Revise the calculations for Unit C. 11. Where are the panel index numbers called out on the drawings? 12. Where is Section 11/A13.1 cut? There does not appear to be a similar cut in the structural details. If shear transfer is to be provided at this detail, revise it as necessary to show an adequate connection. 13. To avoid conflicting information on the drawings, update Section 5 /AB.1 to show the wall sheathing continuous to the roof sheathing per Section 1/53.3. Also, update Detail 25/A9.1 and the detail callout. 14. Section 2/S3.4; how is shear transferred to the party wall? Are the trusses intended to transfer shear like Section 1/S3.4? Clarify drawings and show adequacy. 15. Section 16/53.4; pressure treat the 4x10 beam. 16. Referencing Section 2516(c) is not adequate to show compliance to the foundation ventilation requirements. Put the specific information on the drawings. 17. Building 1: a) Lateral forces must be transferred to shear walls by tributary area. Re- evaluate the forces in the Y -Y direction. b) Provide supporting calculations checking the adequacy of drag struts for combined loads per Section 2303(f) and verify adequacy at connections and discontinuities. c) Call out the size of the footings at the front of the building, Sheet S4.1. 18. There are various elements on the architectural drawings which need to be shown on the structural drawings to show adequacy. Additional calculations need to be provided as well for the following: a) Mechanical equipment enclosures. b) Trash screen. c) Fence posts. Remove all references to CMU if concrete is to be used. d) Gazebo. e) Coordinate any other elements with the architect. 19. Sheet A2.9 must be sealed by the engineer of record. Mahan &DeSaldo September 21, 1990 City of Tukwila Re: 90 -T -07 Page Three Please have the applicant respond to the above comments in . itemized letter form and resubmit two copies of revised drawings . and one copy of calculations, as required. All status inquires are to be directed to our receptionist. Sincerely, Cry tal Kolke CLK:3 cc: Dimitri Demopulos Architects 7277 Regency Square Blvd, Suite 100 Houston, Texas 77036 J. Clark Johnson Engineers 1418 112th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 l M1 _ Mahan &DeSalvo CONSULTING ENGINEERS August 31, 1990 Duane Griffin City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Regarding: 90 -T -07 (Homewood Suites Hotel) 1411 Fourth Avenue Bldg, Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 624 -8150 Dear Mr. Griffin, We have received information on the proposed project and have reviewed it for compliance with the structural portions of the 1988 Edition of the Uniform Building Code. Our comments follow. Due to the incompleteness of the drawings and calculations, additional comments may arise upon review of the completed documents. Structural The following comments apply to all building types unless specifically noted otherwise. 1. In the Structural Notes, note that the recommendations and installation procedures of the Simpson Company will be followed. 2. Provide structural notes for structural steel welding and CMU (used at fence posts). 3. The actual allowable bending stress for Doug -Fir Larch No. 1 beams and stringers is 1300 psi per the West Coast Lumber Inspection Bureau. Refer to Table 25 -A -1. 4. The engineer of record must review the shop drawings and calculations for all structural components designed by others (i.e. prefabricate wood trusses), then send a letter to the City confirming that these drawings and calculations have been reviewed and are compatible with the basic structure. To accommodate this requirement, provide a note in the General Notes stating that the above mentioned procedure will occur. 5. Mechanical loads must be considered in the vertical load analysis of the building. Provide calculations which verify that these loads have been addressed. 6. Sheet A1.1 shows mechanical equipment on all unit decks. Is this intended? If so, show adequacy. 7. Interior footings must be located at least 12" from the top of grade per the recommendations of the soils report. Also, wood located within 6" of earth must be treated per Section 2516(c)7. August 31, 1990 City of Tukwila Re: 90 -T -07 Page Two Mahan &DeSaivo 8. Show footing drains on the drawings as recommended by the soils report. 9. Floor framing is not shown on the drawings for building areas other than unit plans (i.e. stairways, corridors, balconies, decks off units, etc.). Provide the necessary information with supporting calculations. Each building must be readable as a whole. 10. The construction and structural adequacy of the stairs needs to be verified with calculations. Refer to Sheets A10.1 and A10.2 for the only information provided. 11. Provide calculations for concentrated loads and their support at the foundation. Verify adequacy of the square columns shown at decks. The connection of these columns to the roof and adjacent framing members is unclear. Use the soil bearing pressure identified in the soils report. Page 2 in the calculations assumes 2500 psf instead of 2000 psf. 12. Provide an itemized breakdown of dead loads at floor and roof systems. The calculations use 10 psf for floor dead loads; however, the structural details on Sheet S3.3 show gyperete. Also, the new Building 1 calculations use a dead load of 15 psf, not 10 psf. Please clarify. 13. Various foundation plans reference details on Sheet S1.6; however, those details have been voided. Provide the necessary details for our review. 14. Since Hem -Fir studs are an option, shear wall values must be reduced for Group III Species per Table 25 -K -1, footnote 1. All connections must be reduced as well. Provide calculations checking the adequacy of all critical conditions. 15. Provide calculations checking the adequacy of the stud walls assuming the worst case condition (Hem -Fir Standard Grade per Structural Notes). Indicate stud size and spacing on the drawings. 16. Lateral forces must be transferred to shear walls by the tributary area method. Specifically, the longitudinal exterior walls would take less load than the walls inset about 9 feet. These walls would be overloaded and holdowns will be required at many locations. Provide new calculations for the lateral design of the effected buildings. 17. Check all critical walls for overturning, considering the forces at each level. Provide the necessary holdowns at the foundation and straps between floors. 18. The calculations do not show adequate forces to the building in the wind design. For example, page 3 of the calculations uses only a 9' vertical dimension for tributary area to the roof. This building, #2, actually has a large roof and the tributary area would more appropriately be about 19 feet. Revise all locations as necessary. August 31, 1990 City of Tukwila Re: 90 -T -07 Page Three 19. Provide calculations checking the adequacy of horizontal diaphragms. Clarify panel index number on the drawings. 20. Where is Section A/13.1 cut? There does not appear to be a similar cut in the structural details. If shear transfer is to be provided at this detail, revise it as necessary to show an adequate connection. 21. Sections 5/A13.1 and 1/53.3 do not correlate. Section 5/A13.1 appears more correct since the roof pitch is 9:12, typically. Neither detail shows an adequate shear transfer. Clarify and show adequacy. 22. Section 2/S3.4; how is shear transferred to the party wall? Are the trusses intended to transfer shear like Section 1/S3.4? Clarify drawings and show adequacy. 23. Clearly locate grade in Sections 16 and 17/S3.4. 24. Section 16/S3.4 and all related details; complete the missing notes, call out pressure - treatment at all wood against concrete, and provide a dimension from grade to the top of the foundation (6" minimum required per Section 2907(a)). 25. Provide draftstops per Section 2516(f)4. 26. How is the foundation ventilated? Refer to Section 2516(c)6 for requirements. 27. Flashing and counterflashing must be provided at all exterior openings to make them weatherproof. The architectural details on Sheet A7.1 do not show the necessary information. Provide this information for our review. 28. At Building 1: a) The new calculations show up to 438 plf at shear walls. Only shear wall #2 is called out on the drawings, which has a capacity of only 353 plf (once the Hem -Fir reduction is applied). Also, at shear wall #2, clarify size and spacing of field and edge nailing. b) The shear wall lengths shown in the calculations for forces in the Y -Y direction are up to about 40% off. Recalculate the shear wall lengths and revise the lateral design for the Y -Y direction. c) Provide calculations checking overturning. d) Provide calculations for the vertical design of the building. e) Complete the drawing on Sheet S4.1. f) Column footings are to be a minimum of 24" wide. Section A /54.1 is not acceptable. Wall footings must be 18 wide, minimum. Refer to the requirements of the soils report. g) Provide connections details on the framing plans. h) Call out the members on the gabled projection on the north elevation. Mahan &DeSalvo August 31, 1990 City of Tukwila Re: 90 -T -07 Page Four 29. At Building 3: a) There are no shear walls identified in this area. Provide calculations for the lateral design of the building. b) Where are the Building 3 floor framing plans? Provide calculations checking the vertical loads at this area. Storage and equipment loads, etc. must be considered. c) Provide information on the elevator area. Provide calculations checking the adequacy of the foundation. d) Identify and locate trench drain on the foundation plan, Sheet S1.3. e) Provide typical section cuts and details. 30. Are the pool and spa intended to be reviewed under separate permit? If so, note this on drawing; otherwise, provide calculations and adequate drawings for their designs. 31. There are various elements on the architectural drawings which need to be shown on the structural drawings to show adequacy. Additional calculations need to be provided as well for the following: a. Mechanical equipment enclosures. b. Trash screen. c. CMU fence posts. d. Gazebo. e. Coordinate any other elements with the architect. 32. A few sheets did not receive their professional stamps. All A- series sheets containing structural information must be sealed by the engineer of record as well. Please have the applicant respond to the above comments in itemized letter form and resubmit two COMPL TE SETS of drawings and one copy of calculations, as required. All status inquires are to be directed to our receptionist. Sincerely, Cry tal Kolke CLK /CAG:2 cc: Dimitri Demopulos Architects 7277 Regency Square Blvd, Suite 100 Houston, Texas 77036 J. Clark Johnson Engineers 1418 112th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (Mahan &DeSaivo Mahan&DeSalvo CONSULTING ENGINEERS April 9, 1990 Duane Griffin City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Regarding: 90 -T -07 (Homewood Suites Hotel) PR 10 1990 co N t .01.0,1_rA 1411 Fourth Avenue Bldg. Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 624 -8150 Dear Mr. Griffin, We have received information on the proposed project and have reviewed it for compliance with the structural portions of the 1988 Edition of the Uniform Building Code. The drawings are incomplete and need coordination. The following comments are only from a general overview of the project. When drawings and calculations are resubmitted, a complete review will be made at that time. Our comments follow. Structural 1. Call out edition of the Uniform Building Code used for design. 2. S3.1, structural notes, soils report called out is by Associated Earth Sciences. This is not the report submitted for review; please clarify. 3. Recommendations from the soils report: a) The minimum width of wall footing is to be 18". b) The slab is to be free floating. Refer to Section 1 & 3/S1.6. Revise the design to follow the recommendation of the soils report. If the current design is kept, have the soils engineer review the design and comment. 4. General notes on the cover sheet, more specific information on the suspended ceiling is required. Provide Uniform Building Code Standard used or an ICBO report number for seismic bracing. 5. Not all buildings are shown on the architectural drawings that are shown on the site plan. Also, there are Foundation Plans in the structural drawings that are not on the site plan. Coordinate and void all unused information. Also, include missing building E5 in the architectural set. Provide a consistent labeling of buildings for referencing. 6. Building 1, the structural foundation plan is reversed from the architectural plan; please clarify. Check all buildings for similar discrepancies. 7. Building 1, incorrect dimensions were used for the seismic analysis. Also, include 2nd floor load and 25% of their storage loads. April 9, 1990 City of Tukwila Re: 90 -T -07 Page Two Bridget Smith BLS:1 cc: Dimitri Demopulos Architects 7277 Regency Square Blvd, Suite 100 Houston, Texas 77036 8. 2x8 roof rafters appear to be overstressed at building No. 1. Check all buildings. 9. Provide detail of the ridge vent. Are there discontinuous diaphragms? 10. Framing plans are incomplete. Refer to Sheet S2.9. Provide beam sizes and show adequacy. 11. Shear wall schedule, Sheet S3.2, the building numbers do not correlate with the rest of the drawings. These must correlate before we can review the lateral design. Please have the applicant respond to the above comments in itemized letter form and resubmit two copies of revised drawings and one copy of revised calculations, as required. All status inquires are to be directed to our receptionist. Sincerely, • TO EDWARD A. McHUGH JF('" ".IA Architect 545 108th NE Suite 2 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 (206) 454-0690 arti c3F. -1-dv_ttfic,A _ WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans drvirk Maa06Eaala4pd OAT[ JO• NO. L OO 1 ATT[H TION S o' rJ R[: ❑ Samples the following Items: ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order d COPIES I DATE '.') / 15 cc NO. DESCRIPTION Oteleti C,AGI'fs THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as•submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution - ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS ► ; i , t.:uilunCUel;z1vo CONSULTING ENGINEER( October 3, 1990 Duane Griffin City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Regarding: 90 -T -07 (Homewood Suites Hotel) Dear Mr. Griffin, We have received information on the proposed project and have reviewed it for compliance with the structural portions of the 1988 Edition of the Uniform Building Code. Our comments follow. Structural 1. Floor sheathing with a 40/20 panel index number would be inadequate at Building #1 floor framing, which is spaced at 24" o.c. Refer to Sheet S4.2. 2. Section 2/S3.4; how is shear transferred to the party wall? Are the trusses intended to transfer shear like Section 1/53.4? Clarify drawings and show adequacy. 3. Section 16/S3.4; pressure treat the 4x10 beam. 4. Call out the size of foundation vents and include how often they occur to assure compliance to Section 2516(c). 5. All items containing structural information must be sealed by the engineer of record. Refer to Sheet A1.2. Please have the applicant respond to the above comments in itemized letter form and resubmit two copies of revised drawings and one copy of calculations, as required. All status inquires are to be directed to our receptionist. Sincerely, - Cry tal Kolke CLK:4 cc: Dimitri Demopulos Architects 7277 Regency Square Blvd, Suite 100 Houston, Texas 77036 J. Clark Johnson Engineers 1418 112th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98004 1411 Fourth Avenue Bldg. Seattle, Washington 9B101 (206) 6248150 • 201 Smith Tower, Seattle, C .)8104 CORRECTION SHEET RE: Q a• Reviewer's Name: 40 9i5 Address) 9-2- Mall Corrections to: • ,ir 40 Attn. Address 4 5 - �, " /De Plans Status: eot: . ,- ; 17 , ziorpo Ei 4 l 3 1. Plans are approved subject to conditions listed below. 2. Plans must be returned for approval of corrections. John McAlerne l� Seattle --Kin. 'ounty Health Department Env-. mental Health Division Phone (Date) 415 Phone 296 -4787 A/..ali+wcs� / 1211.44,)/2/1hillyntiL .. ¶9) ) ) P.J C' 1' \ } sEF 27 1990 DATE I C0- CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 * *REVISION SUBMITTAL ** PROJECT NAME I DMO (,u od SUA4es ADDRESS v l G J 6 Cj C 6L ,q- - CONTACT PERSON •J' m 1 PHONE a� ( o ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER �k.1 PERMIT NUMBER (If previously issued) PLAN CHECK NUMBER qo -- ( Jc)-- 4 us- I . TYPE OF REVISION: ettm.s10-Ac) u.a. ii SHEET NUMBER(S) "Cloud" or highlight all areas of revisions and date revisions. SUBMITTED TO: * *REVISION SUBMITTAL ** DATE q ta`gO PROJECT NAME 1 47)1 \0 (JXCCt @ULLTJ ADDRESS I C' YL c .5 3� CONTACT PERSON A ) / L / PHONE (6/-vi ( r- ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OGL4'Y1 L J�1 CAA 4l PERMIT NUMBER PLAN CHECK NUMBER TYPE OF REVISION: CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 6 1'0 - ~ EN -j? S . :9O - O1 vcP 9 o , 5 7 q -0136 (206) 431 -3670 (If previously issued) SHEET NUMBER(S) "Cloud" or highlight all areas SUBMITTED TOt ,k' of revisions and date revisions. SUBMITTED TOs CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 REC Z IVC1 * *REVISION SUBMITTAL'`'' DATE "7 / 23/9 0 PROJECT NAME l /U e Ul MS ADDRESS /ter CONTACT PERSON IC,T v C G -Ad PHONE h i - "5"-.06.90 ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER CD inGi u6-e • PERMIT NUMBER (If previously issued) PLAN CHECK J ol - �3 +1'' I? TYPE OF REVISIONS ,4C/t/7 fc • . Gif - 417 - 0 3 3 )g /CD lc7) 0 or highlight all areas of revisions eta ravisio f4e")1162/ PERma CENTER COPIES DATE NO. RE MuwlcWoco SUMS 7 S N4rn. DESCRIPTION A an Chak * q Cr- 13 /j A'A. • 2.9 Dumiti-nata l5 CT(0t4 ttelt II ,thl t% Gr is S_ mit dN to M€ $AN1CAL ui■SctItn► DETAIL - S, Dume .. El■Ict..sv _ DATE 9 i74 to JOO NO. °/o `+ A TT[N 7" o N U MsTI� RE MuwlcWoco SUMS 7 S N4rn. A an Chak * q Cr- 13 . hry tqd - 1 - $ TO EDWARD A. McHUGH J 11A Architect 545 108th NE Suite eo BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 (206) 454-0690 CeTf of 'NKwi 1,r4 6 1...00 ss ow g8188 WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Prints ❑ Change order ❑ Plans COPY TO [ETUTE ITQUMSETTITEL THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ,For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution * s requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return cor 'rected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS % AMPS - 114 ES a 06/7 t PL!► Fl &t 5 . PLE C4Lt• ( ' ti ' ' ` ' ' 14m at • -PI lb SIGNED: ❑ Samples _ ❑ Specifications 1/ .nrin.uret Sr. ant t•t nnl.A binAly wall /v nil et ane.. the following items: CIT1 PLC:.. [ EP b sea e' 201 Smith Tower;. :Seattle, I , -98104 CORRECTION SHEET RE: Mail Corrections to: .40. s 4,0 . • 1 & _ Attn: Address--/ De 3) 9 f 3 Zi Qrl ®6 f Plans Status: Q 1. Plans are approved subject to conditions listed below. 2. Plans must be returned for approval of corrections. Reviewer's Name: (Address) (Date) ayni anog edaL John McAlerne Seattle- Kinpnunty Health Department Envi`; . imental Health Division Phone 4154 P Phone 296 -4787 PAM /_ • ,MYTMAIRAMILTPT"' 111111111n TO EDWARD A. McHUGH JR.C Architect 545 108th NE Suite 2 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 (206) 454 -0690 COPIES DATE NO. ct oF K(A) ( lam_ 'WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans dL T4CT'`T 7 CF 'MKS rTThu OATS ATTENTION 911%32 94-Agotcm [JOE NO. C o ©i RI DESCRIPTION ❑ Samples the following items: ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution - ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTIICENTEk BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WAS111NCTON 98188 Plan Check #90 -132: Homewood Suites #A 6915 Southcenter B1 I'NONE a (x,06) 433.1800 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS APPLY TO AND BECOME JRj f THE APPROVED PLANS UNDER TUKWILA BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER 1. No changes will be made to the plans unless approved by the Architect and the Tukwila Building Division. 2. Plumbing permit shall be obtained through the King County Health Department and plumbing will be inspected by that agency, including all gas piping (296 - 4732). 3. Electrical permit shall be obtained through the Washington State Division of Labor and Industries and all electrical work will be inspected by that agency (277- 7272). 4. All mechanical work shall be under separate permit through the City of Tukwila. 5. All permits, inspection records, and approved plans shall be posted at the job site prior to the start of any construction. 6. When special inspection is required either the owner, architect or engineer shall notify the Tukwila Building Division of appointment of the inspection agencies prior to the first building inspection. Copies of all special inspection reports shall be submitted to the Building Division in a timely manner. Reports shall contain address, project name and permit number of the project being inspected. 7. All structural welding to be done by W.A.B.O. certified welder and special inspected (Sec. 306, UBC). 8. Engineereed truss drawings and calculations shall be on site and available to the building inspector for inspection purposes. Documents shall bear the seal and signature of a Washington State Professional Engineer. 9. Any exposed insulations backing material to have Flame Spread Rating of 25 or less, and material shall bear identification showing the fire performance rating thereof. Gary L. VanDusr », Mayor Homewood Suites #A Page 2 10. Subgrade preparation including drainage, excavation, compaction, and fill requirements shall conform strictly with recommendations given in the soils report prior to final inspection ( see attached procedure). 11. A statement from the roofing contractor verifying fire retardancy of roof will be required prior to final inspection (see attached procedure). 12. All construction to be done in conformance with approved plans and requirements of the Uniform Building Code (1988 Edition), Uniform Mechanical Code (1988 Edition), Washington State Energy Code (1990 Edition), and Washington State Regulations for Barrier Free Facility (1990 Edition). 13. All food preparation establishments must have King County Health Department sign -off prior to opening or doing any food processing. Arrangements for final Health Department inspection should be made by calling King County Health Department, 296 -4787, at least three working days prior to desire inspection date. On work requiring Health Department approval, it is the contractor's responsibility to have a set of plans approved by that agency on the job site. 14. Notify the City of Tukwila Building Division prior to placing any concrete. This procedure is in addition to any requirements for special inspection. 15. All wood to remain in placed concrete shall be treated wood. 16. All structural masonry shall be special inspected per U.B.C. Section 306 (a) 7. 17. A separate health department approval and mechanical permit is required for pool and spa. 18. Prior to placing concrete for foundations with crawl spaces, architect is to submit details of foundation venting for review and approval. 19. Validity of Permit. The issuance of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for , or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. No permit presuming to give authority or violate or cancel the provisions of this code shall be valid. I ! "X" REQUIRED INSPECTIONS PHONE DATE APPROVED INSPECT. INITIALS DATE(S) CORRECTION NOTICE ISSUED 1 Footings 431 -3670 X 2 Foundation 431 -3670 3 Slab and/or Slab Insulation 431 -3670 I 4 Shear Wall Nailing 431 -3670 X 5 Roof Sheathing Nailing 431 -3670 6 Masonry Chimney 431 -3670 X 7 Framing 431 -3670 X 8 Insulation 431 -3670 9 Suspended Ceiling 431 -3670 10 Wall Board Fastening 431 -3670 11 12 1 13 14 FIRE FINAL Insp: 575 -4407 15 PLANNING FINAL 431 -3670 LX 16 PUBLIC WORKS FINAL 431 -3670 COMMENT SECTION 17 BUILDING FINAL 431 -3670 (INSPECTOR ON REVERSE) BUILD1G PERMIT INSPECTION RECORD Post with Building Permit in conspicuous place Department of Community Development - Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 SITE ADDRESS: 6915 Southcenter B1 SUITE NO.: BUILDING PERMIT NO. DATE ISSUED: ►o 1 I - q PROJECT: Homewood Suites #A CALL FOR INSPECTIONS AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS All approved plans and permits shall be maintained available on the site in the same location. 1. FOOTING - When survey stakes and forms are set and rebar is tied in place. 2. FOUNDATION - When forms and rebar are in place. 3. SLAB - If structural slab or if underslab insulation is required. 4. SHEARWALL NAILING - Prior to cover. 5. ROOF SHEATHING NAILING - Prior to cover. 6. MASONRY CHIMNEY - Approximately midpoint. 7. FRAMING - After rough -in inspections such as mechanical, plumbing, gas piping, electrical and fire stopping is in place. 8. INSULATION - After framing approval, but before installation of wallboard. Baffles must be installed to keep attic ventilation points clear. 9. SUSPENDED CEILING - Fasten diffusers, lights and seismic bracing. 10. WALL BOARD FASTENING - Prior to taping (see UBC Chap. 47 and Table 47G). 11 12. 13. 14. FINAL FIRE INSPECTION - Contact Fire Department for their requirements. 15. FINAL PLANNING INSPECTION - Contact Planning Department for their requirements. 16. FINAL PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTION - Contact Public Works Department for their requirements. 17. FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION - When all work, corrections, reports and other inspections are complete. OTHER AGENCIES: Plumbing (including gas piping) — King County Health Department — 296 -4732 Electrical — Washington State Department of Labor and Industries — 277 -7272 A preconstruction meeting with the Building Inspector may be scheduled prior to starting the job by contacting the Department of Community Development, Building Division at 431 -3670. Although not required, a meeting of this type can often eliminate problems, delays and misunderstandings as the project progresses. UM= 'X' REQUIRED INSPECTIONS �.. 1 Footings 2 Foundation A 3 Slab and/or Slab Insulation a 4 Shear Watt Nailing 5 Root Sheathing Nailing 9 6 Masonry Chimney 7 Framing 8 insulation 0 Suspended Coiling r 1 0 Wall Board Fastening 12 I ll __ , �►�, 13 FIRE FINA6tnsp: 15 Pi.ANNING FINAL. i16 Of PUBLIC WORKS FINAL 17 BUILDING FINAL PLAN CHECK NUMBER q0 -- 138 c PROJECT: THIS FOLLOW:NO COMMENTS APPLY TO ANO IECOMI; PART OF IN APPROVED PLANS U TUKWILA IUILOINp PERMIT NUMBER . 0 Na changes will be sods to the plant unless approved by the VVVVVV������� Architect and the Tukoils Budding Division. � 2 y Plumbing permit shall be obtained through the cling County Health Department and plusbtoa will be inspected by that agency, including all gat piping 1296041321. Electrical permit shall be obtained through the Washington State Division of Labor and Industries and all electrical wort sill So inspected by that agency 072.03631. 0 (,07 All permits, inspection records, and approved plans shall be �/� posted at the job site prior to the start of any construction. 0 When special inspection is required dither the owner, architect or engineer shall notify the Tutuila Building Division of appointment of the inspection agencies prior to the first building inspection. Copies of all special inspection reports shall be submitted to the Building Division in a timely sinner. Reports shall contain address, project name and permit number of the project being inspected. 0 All structural concrete to be special inspected l0ec. 300, UBC1. All structural welding to be done by W.A.0.0. certified welder and special inspected 'Sec. 300, UDC). All high•strength bolting to be special inspected 10ec. 306, UDC). f0 Any new ceiling grid and light flsture installation is required to meet lateral bracing requirements for Seismic lone 3. ll Partition walls attached to ceiling grid must be laterally braced 11 over eight l0) fist to length. 12 Readily accessible access to roof counted equipsont is required. Engineereed truss drawings and calculations shall be on site and available to the building inspector for inspection purposes. Oocusents shall bear the seal and signature of a Washington State Air Professio Engineer. Any espoted insulations backing material to have Floss Spread Noting of 20 or less, and material shall bear identification showing the fire psrloreaece rating thereof. All mechanical work shall be under separate perelt through the City of Tukwila. Oubgrade preparation including drainage, essavation, compaction. and fill requiressnts shall confer, strictly with recoasendaticns given in the soils report prior to final inspection )see attached procedure.). A statement from the roofing contractor verifying lire retardancy 1111�'`✓i" of root wilt be required prior to final inspection isle attached procedural. tR All construction to be done in conformance sith approved plans and lll///���� requtrescnts of the Uniform Building Cods (1908 Edition), Uniform Mechanical Code 11905 Edition), Washignton State Energy Code 119119 Edition), and Washington Stag Regulations for Barrier Free cilsty 11909 Edition). A 11 food preparation establishaents must have King County Health Department sign•ofi prior to opening or doing any food processing. Arrangements for final Health Department inspection should be aide by calling King County Health Department, 29004787, at least three working days prior to desire Inspection date. On work requiring Health Department approval, it is the contractor's responsibility to have a set of plans approved by that agency on the job site. 14 Fire retardant treated wood shall have a flags spread of not over 23. All saterlals shall bear identification showing the fire perlorsance rating thereof. Such Identification shall be issued by an approved agency having a service for inspection at the factory. 0 Notify the City of Tutuila Building Division prior to placing any concrete. this procedure is in addition to any resutresents for spacial inspection. 21 All spray applied fireproofing as required by U.B.C. Standard No. 43 -0, shall be special Inspected. All mood to reesin ih placed concrete shall be treated wood. All structural canonry shall be special Inspected oar U.B.C. Seetios 306 Ial 7. Validity of Permit. The issuance Of a permit or approval of V`�' t;rj plans, speclficatlens and computations shall not be construed to be a permit for , or an approval of, any violation of any of the Previsions of this code or of any Other ordinance of the 1urisdICtlon. No permit presusing to give authority or violate or cencol the provisions of this cods shall be valid. I,, Edward A. AH A CT 545 106TH NE SUITE 2 McHughJr AIpPHONE (206)484.0690 July 17, 1990 Mr. Bob Benedicto Senior PLan Reviewer City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Building Division 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Homewood Suites Hotel Re: Plan Review Comments (5 pages) FAX Transmitted to Mark Hansen 4/25/90 Dear Mr. Benedicto: RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JUL. 1 / PERMIT CENTER Enclosed are (2) complete sets of architectural plans for the above project as you have requested. The sheets that have "7/17/90 city plan check" in the revision col mn are the sheets that were revised per your plan review comments of 4/25/90. Also enclosed are (2) copies of a dimensioned site plan prepared by Touma Eng neers and (2) copies of wall and floor /ceiling tests. The following is our response to your list of comments to Mark Hansen. Comments ✓Item 1, Site Plan Dimensions: A new dimensioned site plan was prepared by Touma Engineering showing all setbacks and distances between buildings. (2) copies of this site plan are enclosed. ✓Item 2, Handicapped Stalls: Sheet A1.1: Site plan has been revised and now shows the (3) wheelchair stalls on the same side of the driveway as the buildings. item 3, Sheet A2.1 Doors Swing Building Al: Sheet A2.1, door Al has been revised to show doors opening out. Vitem 4, Sheet A2.1 Door L1: Door has been revised to comply with section 511.1 of Regulations for Barrier Free Design. Item 5, Wall Assembly: Enclosed are (2) copies of each wall test for rated walls shown on A2.4 Mr. Bob Benedicto Page 2 July 17, 1990 ► CITY OF 7 U? <WIL A .JUL 1 ? 199 PERMIT CENTER ( /Item 6, Elevator Door Opening /Rated Corridor: All plans have been revised to comply with section 1706b and 3305h by addition of elevator lobby with self closing fire doors. ✓Item 7, Sheet A4.1 Stud Wall Framing: General Note #2 has been revised to show 3 x 4 stuck @ 16 inches o.c. ✓Item 8, Sheet A4.2 Breezeway: Notes and detail references added to plan. t Atem 9, Sheet A6.1 Door Schedule: Note number 2 added to plans to indicate 20 minute rated assemblies for all guest unit entry doors. 1 Item 10, Sheet A6.1 Lever Hardware @ Handicapped Units: Note number 3 added regarding lever type hardware at handicapped units. ✓item 11, Sheet A6.1 Lever Hardware Building Al: Note added to schedule regarding lever type hardware at all public spaces in lodge building Al. Item 12, Sheet 8.1 Stud Wall Framing: Note revised regarding framing of the first floor at the three story building. Item 13, Sheet A9.1 Elevator Shaft: Elevator shaft wall revised from CMU to wood frame. Item 14, Sheets A9.1 and A9.2 Sound Transmission: Attached are (2) copies of a fire and sound test on our floor ceiling assembly taken from the latest edition of the Gypsum Association Fire Resistance Design Manual indicating compliance with UBC 3501(c) sound control. Item 15, Sheet A9.2: One hour tent around recessed light fixture added to detail. Item 16, Sheet A9.2 Party Wall Firestopping: Notes have been added to wall sections indicating horizontal firestopping. Item 17, Sheet A10.1 Perimeter Insulation: Revised buildings with guest rooms to crawl space with R19 bath insulation. On sheet 19.2 building sections through lodge building we added note regarding insulation under slab to comply within state energy code. Item 18, Sheet A10.1 Exterior Wall Section: As discussed with you at your office, I interpret the 4 x 10 x 1/2" steel beam as being exempt from 1 hour protection per section 3305g, Exception #3. No revisions were made to this detail subject to your review and approval. Item 19, Sheet A11.1 Handicapped Kitchen: Kitchen counter tops revised to conform to Barrier Free Design. Item 20, Sheet A2.2 Storage Room: Walls are shown in storage room and 6' headroom limit indicated. Mr. Bob Benedicto : Page 3 July 17, 1990 r� CITY oECFIVED 7 (11( ILA JUL 1 7 1990 PENMrr cENTEa Item: 21, Energy, Calcs: Energy: calculations were submitted at time of permit application. It is my understanding they were missing at the time -of your checklist preparation but you now have them. We hope you find the above and the enclosed to your satisfaction. Respectfully submitted, ( E dward A. McHugh, Jr. , MA: EAM /.av Enclosure cc John Davis Dimitri Demopulos Sound GA Rating STC 50 to 54 45 to 49 • • '.- r, - ate..= . --� y . . • ' File No. WP 3230 WP 3240 (I) DETAILED DESCRIPTION Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Mineral Fiber, Wood Studs One layer 5 /B" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied parallel to resilient channels 24" 04. with 1" type S drywall screws at edges 6" o.c. and center row 12" o.c. End joints back - blocked with resilient channels. Resilient channels attached at right angles to 2 x 4 wood studs 16" o.c. with 6d coated nails, 1'/a" long, 0.086" shank, 1 /4" heads, 1 /2" x 3" gypsum wallboard filler strip attached to plate at floor line with 6d nails as described above 16" o.c. 11/2" glass fiber 0.8 pcf attached to studs in stud space with 1/2" long staples. On opposite side one layer 3/4" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles to studs with 6d nails as described above 8" o.c. Stagger end joints 48" o.c. each side. Sound tested with 31/2" glass fiber insula- tion. (LOAD-BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Mineral Fiber, Wood Studs One layer 3/4" proprietary type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied parallel to resilient channels 24" o.c. with 1" type S drywall screws at edges and center row 12" o.c. End joints back- blocked with resilient channels. Resilient channels attached at right angles to 2 x 4 wood studs 16'' or 24" o.c. with 1 type S drywall screws. 3" mineral fiber 2.0 or 2.3 pcf in stud space. On opposite side one layer 3" proprietary type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles to studs with 1 type W drywall screws 12" o.c. Stagger vertical joints 48" o.c. each side. Sound tested with studs 16" c.c. and open face of 2.0 pcf mineral fiber blankets toward resilient side of stud space. (LOAD - BEARING) WP 3330 Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Wood Fiberboard, Wood Studs Base layer 1 /2" wood fiberboard 0.82 psf nailed parallel to each side of 2 x 4 wood studs 16" o.c. with 5d coated nails 1%" long, 0.0915" shank, 1 /4" heads, 24" o.c. and to top and bottom plates at 16" o.c. Face layer 3/4" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base on each side applied parallel to studs with 6" wide strips of I /2" thick beads of laminating adhesive to perimeter and center of board. 8d coated nails 2 long, 0.131" shank, %2" heads, spaced 12" o.c. to top and bottom plates, 24" o.c. along vertical joints and at third - points to intermediate studs. Stagger joints 24" o.c. each layer and side. (LOAD - BEARING) WP 3260 (g, k) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Mineral Fiber, Wood Studs Base layer 1 /4 " proprietary gypsum wallboard applied parallel to each side of 2 x 4 wood studs 16" o.c. with 4d coated nails 1 long, 0.099" shank, 1 /4" heads, 12" o.c. 1 mineral fiber 0.8 pct in stud space. Face layer 3/4" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied parallel to studs and attached with 6" wide strips of laminating compound each edge and center and 6d coated nails 1 long, 0.0915" shank, 1 /4" heads, 16" o.c. to plates. Stagger joints 16" o.c. each layer and side. (LOAD - BEARING) i Fire 1 Sound 1 71 Cl r'r• r SKETCH AND DESI GN DATA Fire Side Thickness: 5 Approx. Weight: 7 psi Fire Test: OSU T-3127, 10 -4.65 Sound Test: RAL TL 77 -138, 5.5 -77 Fire Side Thickness: 5 Approx. Weight: 7 psf Fire Test: UL R1319 -93, 94, 129 Design U311, 8-10-66 ULC Design U311 Sound Test: BBN 760903, 9-1776 Thickness: 5%" Approx. Weight: 9 psf Fire Test: See WP 3340 Sound Test: G & H BW-35ST, 4-16-69 Thickness: 5 %" Approx. Weight: S psi Fire Test: OSU T-3054, 4 -3.65 Sound Test: OR 64-73, 9-23-64 • • ,w • rye/. w... ',YA.i:'{.+.�w.+.Ni.i•rwMw�i..� Sound GA Rating File STC No. 50 to 54 45 to 49 WP 3230 WP 3240 (t) WP 3260 (g, k) WP 3330 DETAILED DESCRIPTION Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Mineral Fiber, Wood Studs One layer 5 4" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied parallel to resilient channels 24" o.c. with 1" type S drywall screws at edges 6" o.c. and center row 12" o.c. End joints back - blocked with resilient channels. Resilient channels attached at right angles to 2 x 4 wood studs 16" o.c. with 6d coated nails, 1 long, 0.086" shank, 1" heads, 1 /2" x 3" gypsum wallboard filler strip attached to plate at floor line with 6d nails as described above 16" o.c. 1 glass fiber 0.8 pcf attached to studs in stud space with 1/2" long staples. On opposite side one layer W type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles to studs with 6d nails as described above 8" o.c. Stagger end joints 48" o.c. each side. Sound tested with 31" glass fiber insula- tion. (LOAD - BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Mineral Fiber, Wood Studs One layer 5 / 6 " proprietary type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied parallel to resilient channels 24" o.c. with 1" type S drywall screws at edges and center row 12" o.c. End joints back - blocked with resilient channels. Resilient channels attached at right angles to 2 x 4 wood studs 16" or 24" o.c. with 1 type S drywall screws. 3" mineral fiber 2.0 or 2.3 pct in stud space. On opposite side one layer %" proprietary type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles to studs with 1 type W drywall screws 12" o.c. Stagger vertical joints 48" o.c. each side. Sound tested with studs 16" o.c. and open face of 2.0 pcf mineral fiber blankets toward resilient side of stud space. (LOAD - BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Mineral Fiber, Wood Studs Base layer V " proprietary gypsum wallboard applied parallel to each side of 2 x 4 wood studs 16" o.c. with 4d coated nails We long, 0.099" shank, 1/4" heads, 12" o.c. 11" mineral fiber 0.8 pct in stud space. Face layer %" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied parallel to studs and attached with 6" wide strips of laminating compound each edge and center and 6d coated nails 1 long, 0,0915" shank, 1 /4" heads, 16" o.c. to plates. Stagger joints 16" o.c. each layer and side. (LOAD - BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Wood Fiberboard, Wood Studs Base layer 1 /2" wood fiberboard 0.82 psi nailed parallel to each side of 2 x 4 wood studs 16" o.c. with 5d coated nails 1 % %" long, 0.0915" shank, VA " heads, 24" o.c. and to top and bottom plates at 16" o.c. Face layer 1/4" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base on each side applied parallel to studs with 6" wide strips of Ye thick beads of laminating adhesive to perimeter and center of board. 8d coated nails 2 long, 0.131" shank,' /," heads, spaced 12" o.c. to top and bottom plates, 24" o.c. along vertical joints and at third - points to intermediate studs. Stagger joints 24" o.c. each layer and side. (LOAD - BEARING) SKETCH AND DESIGN DATA Fire Sound r Fire Side Fire Side Thickness: 53 %" Approx. Weight: 7 psi Fire Test: OSU T-3127, 10 -4.65 Sound Test: RAL TL 77 -138, 5.5.77 Thickness: 5 Approx. Weight: 7 psi Fire Test: UL R1319-93, 94, 129 Design U311, 8.10 -66 ULC Design U311 Sound Test: BBN 760903, 9-17-76 Thickness: 5 Approx. Weight: S psi Fire Test: OSU T.3054, 4.3.65 Sound Test: OR 64 -73, 9.23 -64 • Thickness: 5 %" Approx. Weight: 9 psi Fire Test: See WP 3340 Sound Test: G & H BW -35ST, 4 -16-69 I±.. WAL.S AND INTERIOR PARTITIONS''" IVOOD RAIYIED �1f�[Y'_i.�3i�.S�i�+� . 1 - _- _ W �I�AQ.11jSLV�,7' r��S.Lw.ww�.iY�../-�►� - • ♦. _ .. �Y.'_`jf, - """I Routing STC 30 to 34 55 to 59 File No. WP 3620 WP 3810 WP 3812 DETAILED DESCRIPTION Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Wood Studs One layer 6 / / " type X plain or predecorated gypsum wallboard, water resistant backer board or veneer base applied parallel with or at right angles to each side of 2 x 4 wood studs 16" o.c. with 6d coated nails, 1V / long. 0.0915" shank, V." heads, 7" o.c. Joints of square edge, bevel edge or predecorated wallboard may be left exposed. Stagger joints each side. (LOAD - BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Veneer Base, Veneer Plaster, Wood Studs One layer 1 /2" type X gypsum veneer base applied at right angles to each side of 2 x 4 wood studs 16" o.c. with 5d etched nails, 1 long, 0.099" shank, 1 /4" heads, 8" o.c. Minimum x / gypsum- veneer plaster over each face. Stagger vertical joints 16" o.c. and horizontal joints each side 12" o.c. Sound tested without veneer plaster. (LOAD - BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Two Wall Assembly, Wood Studs Base layer 1/2" type X gypsum wallboard applied at right angles to 2 x 4 wood studs 24" o.c. with 6d coated nails, 1%" long, 0.0915" shank, 1/4" heads, 16" o.c. Face layer 1 i4" type X gyp- sum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles to studs over base layer and to top and bottom framing with 8d coated nails. 2 long, 0.099" shank, x/32" heads, 8" o.c. Face layer joints and edges staggered 24" o.c. over base layer joints and edges. Single inner layer V2" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied parallel to studs and to top and bottom framing with 6d coated nails, 11/4" long, 0.0915" shank, V." heads, 8" o.c. Second wall duplicate of first wall and separated by 1" space. Walls independently loaded. Achieved 59 STC with 31" glass fiber 0.75 pcf friction fit in stud spaces both sides, 57 STC without insulation. (LOAD - BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Two Wall Assembly, Wood Studs Base layer 1 h" type X gypsum wallboard applied at right angles to 2 x 4 wood studs 24" o.c. with 6d coated nails, 1%" long, 0.086" shank, V." heads, 16" o.c. Face layel type X gyp- sum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles to studs over base layer and to top and bottom framing with 8d coated nails, 2 long, 0.099" shank, % heads, 8" o.c. Face layer joints and edges staggered 24" c.c. over base layer joints and edges. Single inner layer %" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied parallel to studs and to top and bottom framing with 6d coated nails, 1 %" long, 0.0915" shank, Vs" heads, 8" o.c. Second wall duplicate of first wall and separated by 1' space. Walls independently loaded. 3 glass fiber 0.75 pcf friction fit in stud spaces to achieve sound rating. (LOAD - BEARING) Fire Fire Sound GA SKETCH AND DESIGN DATA Rating HR 2 HR • Thickness: 4 Approx. Weight: 7 psi Fire Test: UL R1319.4, 6, Design U305, 6-17-52; R2717 -39, 1- 20.66; R3501.52, 3 -15-66 ULC Design W301 Sound Test: OR 64-8, 2-4-64 , �1 f 'ti Thickness: 4%" Approx. Weight: 7 psi Fire Test: UC, 1-12-66 Sound Test: G & H IBI.35FT, 5-26-64 Thickness: 11" Approx, Weight: 7 psi each wall Fire Test: FM WP 297, 1-5-73 Sound Test: RAL TL 73-224, 7.30 -73 a • Thickness: 111/4" Approx. Weight: 7 psi each wall Fire Test: See WP 3810 n(y7i j ti ), \:'i < �� ./,) ) . r / \ 01 :3 J 1 1i� . I±.. WAL.S AND INTERIOR PARTITIONS''" IVOOD RAIYIED �1f�[Y'_i.�3i�.S�i�+� . 1 - _- _ W �I�AQ.11jSLV�,7' r��S.Lw.ww�.iY�../-�►� - • ♦. _ .. �Y.'_`jf, - """I Routing STC 30 to 34 55 to 59 File No. WP 3620 WP 3810 WP 3812 DETAILED DESCRIPTION Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Wood Studs One layer 6 / / " type X plain or predecorated gypsum wallboard, water resistant backer board or veneer base applied parallel with or at right angles to each side of 2 x 4 wood studs 16" o.c. with 6d coated nails, 1V / long. 0.0915" shank, V." heads, 7" o.c. Joints of square edge, bevel edge or predecorated wallboard may be left exposed. Stagger joints each side. (LOAD - BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Veneer Base, Veneer Plaster, Wood Studs One layer 1 /2" type X gypsum veneer base applied at right angles to each side of 2 x 4 wood studs 16" o.c. with 5d etched nails, 1 long, 0.099" shank, 1 /4" heads, 8" o.c. Minimum x / gypsum- veneer plaster over each face. Stagger vertical joints 16" o.c. and horizontal joints each side 12" o.c. Sound tested without veneer plaster. (LOAD - BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Two Wall Assembly, Wood Studs Base layer 1/2" type X gypsum wallboard applied at right angles to 2 x 4 wood studs 24" o.c. with 6d coated nails, 1%" long, 0.0915" shank, 1/4" heads, 16" o.c. Face layer 1 i4" type X gyp- sum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles to studs over base layer and to top and bottom framing with 8d coated nails. 2 long, 0.099" shank, x/32" heads, 8" o.c. Face layer joints and edges staggered 24" o.c. over base layer joints and edges. Single inner layer V2" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied parallel to studs and to top and bottom framing with 6d coated nails, 11/4" long, 0.0915" shank, V." heads, 8" o.c. Second wall duplicate of first wall and separated by 1" space. Walls independently loaded. Achieved 59 STC with 31" glass fiber 0.75 pcf friction fit in stud spaces both sides, 57 STC without insulation. (LOAD - BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Two Wall Assembly, Wood Studs Base layer 1 h" type X gypsum wallboard applied at right angles to 2 x 4 wood studs 24" o.c. with 6d coated nails, 1%" long, 0.086" shank, V." heads, 16" o.c. Face layel type X gyp- sum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles to studs over base layer and to top and bottom framing with 8d coated nails, 2 long, 0.099" shank, % heads, 8" o.c. Face layer joints and edges staggered 24" c.c. over base layer joints and edges. Single inner layer %" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied parallel to studs and to top and bottom framing with 6d coated nails, 1 %" long, 0.0915" shank, Vs" heads, 8" o.c. Second wall duplicate of first wall and separated by 1' space. Walls independently loaded. 3 glass fiber 0.75 pcf friction fit in stud spaces to achieve sound rating. (LOAD - BEARING) Fire Fire Sound GA SKETCH AND DESIGN DATA Rating HR 2 HR • Thickness: 4 Approx. Weight: 7 psi Fire Test: UL R1319.4, 6, Design U305, 6-17-52; R2717 -39, 1- 20.66; R3501.52, 3 -15-66 ULC Design W301 Sound Test: OR 64-8, 2-4-64 , �1 f 'ti Thickness: 4%" Approx. Weight: 7 psi Fire Test: UC, 1-12-66 Sound Test: G & H IBI.35FT, 5-26-64 Thickness: 11" Approx, Weight: 7 psi each wall Fire Test: FM WP 297, 1-5-73 Sound Test: RAL TL 73-224, 7.30 -73 a • Thickness: 111/4" Approx. Weight: 7 psi each wall Fire Test: See WP 3810 1 HR 2 HR 30 to 34 55 to 59 WP 3620 WP 3810 WP 3812 ifL1fT CEAITEf Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Wood Studs One layer b / type X plain or predecorated gypsum wallboard, water resistant backer board or veneer base applied parallel with or at right angles to each side of 2 x 4 wood studs 16" o.c. with 6d coated nails, 1%" long. 0.0915" shank, V4" heads, 7" o.c. Joints of square edge, bevel edge or predecorated wallboard may be left exposed. Stagger joints each side. (LOAD - BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Veneer Base, Veneer Plaster, Wood Studs One layer 1 /2" type X gypsum veneer base applied at right angles to each side of 2 x 4 wood studs 16" o.c. with 5d etched nails, 1 long, 0.099" shank. 1 /4" heads, 8" o.c. Minimum V / gypsum - veneer plaster over each face. Stagger vertical joints o.c. and horizontal joints each side 12" o.c. Sound tested without veneer plaster. (LOAD- BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Two Wall Assembly, Wood Studs Base layer i/s " type X gypsum wallboard applied at right angles to 2 x 4 wood studs 24" o.c. with 6d coated nails, 1W long, 0.0915" shank, 1/4" heads, 16" o.c. Face layer 1 /2" type X gyp- sum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles to studs over base layer and to top and bottom framing with 8d coated nails. 2%" long, 0.099" shank, %2" heads, 8" o.c. Face layer joints and edges staggered 24" o.c. over base layer joints and edges. Single inner layer 1/2" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied parallel to studs and to top and bottom framing with 6d coated nails, 1 long, 0.0915" shank, 14" heads, 8" o.c. Second wall duplicate of first wall and separated by 1" space. Walls independently loaded. Achieved 59 STC with 3 glass fiber 0.75 pcf friction fit in stud spaces both sides, 57 STC without insulation. (LOAD- BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Two Wall Assembly, Wood Studs Base layer 1" type X gypsum wallboard applied at right angles to 2 x 4 wood studs 24" o.c. with 6d coated nails, 1%" long, 0.086" shank, Vi" heads, 16" o.c. Face layer 1" type X gyp- sum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles to studs over base layer and to top and bottom framing with 8d coated nails, 2 %" long, 0.099" shank, % heads, 8" o.c. Face layer joints and edges staggered 24" o.c. over base layer joints and edges. Single Inner layer b,%" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied parallel to studs and to top and bottom framing with 6d coated nails, 1r,," long. 0.0915" shank, 14" heads, 8" o.c. Second wall duplicate of first wall and separated by 1" space. Wells independently loaded. 31" glass fiber 0.75 pct friction fit in stud spaces to achieve sound rating. (LOAD- BEARING) . J,.`JUI JA DETAILED DESCRIPTION JUL 19 19 SKETCH AND DESIGN DATA Fire • X I� l Sound • Thickness: VA" Approx. Weight: 7 psf Fire Test: UL R1319.4, 6, Design U305, 6-17-52; R2717-39, 1- 20 -66; R3501.52, 3 -15-66 ULC Design W301 Sound Test: OR 64-8, 2-4 -64 • Thickness: 4%" Approx. Weight: 7 psf Fire Test: UC, 1 -12.66 Sound Test: G & H IBI.35FT, 5.26 -64 Thickness: 11" Approx. Weight: 7 psf each wall Fire Test: FM WP 297, 1.5.73 Sound Test: RAL TL 73.224, 7-30-73 Thickness: 11 Vi " Approx. Weight: 7 psf each wall Fire Test: See WP 3810 EXTERIOR WALLS Fire Sound GA Rating Rating File STC No. 1 HR 2 HR 35 to 39 WP 8124 (g•w') WP 8125 (g 50 1 54 /' ) JUL 1 r DETAILED DESCRIPTION . LLI, Construction type: Gypsum Wallboard, Gypsum Sheathing, Wood Studs Interior side: One layer 5 4" type X gypsum wallboard or water resistant backer board or veneer base applied parallel with or at right angles to 2 x 4 wood studs, 24" o.c. with 6d coated nails 1%" long, 0.0915" shank, V." heads, 7" o.c. Joints of square edge or bevel edge wallboard may be left exposed. Exterior side: One layer 5 4" type X gypsum sheathing, 48" wide, applied parallel to studs with galv roofing nails, 13" long, 0.120" shank, 7 / 16 " or 1/2" heads, 7" o.c. in field, 4" o.c. perimeter. Wallboard and sheathing nailed to top and bottom plates at 7" o.c. Exterior cladding to be attached through sheathing to studs. (LOAD - BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Polyethylene Film, Wood Studs, Glass Fiber, Foam Plastic Boards, Plywood Siding Interior side; 5 / 8 " type X gypsum wallboard applied over 6 mil polyethylene film and parallel to 2 x 4 wood studs 16" o.c. with 6d smooth bright nails 2" long. 0.115" shank, 0.265" head, 8" \ o.c. Unlaced 3 /8" glass fiber 0.97 pcf friction fit in stud space. 'Exterior side; 1" proprietary aluminum foil faced, glass reinforc- ea'socyanurate foam plastic sheathing applied parallel to studs with \jl ga galvanized roofing nails, 11/2" long, 0.122" shank, 0,428 "head, 12" o.c. in field. 8" o.c. around perimeter. 5 4" plywoods,Oing panels applied parallel to studs with 10d galvaniz- ed commo palls, 3" long, 0.135" shank, 0.307" head, 12" o.c. in field, 6" es., around perimeter. Rating based on the lesser of loading to 2 7 lbs/stud or 83 %io of full design load. (LOAD-BEARING). Construction Type: Fibe Interior base layer 1" proprie forced isocyanurate foam plas studs 16" o,c. with 11 ga galvan 0.122" shank, 0.428" head, 12" perimeter with joints taped with 2" aluminum foil tape. Face layer 5 / type plied parallel to studs with 10d smooth brig 0,128" shank, 0.295" head, 8" o.c. Unfaced 3 Kt friction fit in stud space. Exterior side 1 /2" int fiberboard sheathing applied parallel to studs with ed roofing nails, 1 long,•0.122" shank, 0.428" h in field, 3" o.c. around perimeter. 5 4" plywood siding p plied parallel to studs with Bd galvanized box nails, 2 0.104" shank, 0.255" head, 12" o.c. in field, 6" o.c. ar perimeter. Rating based on the lesser of loading to 2104 lbs/s or 75% of lull design load. (LOAD - BEARING) sum Wallboard, Foam Plastic Boards, ,f d Studs, Glass Fiber, Wood / 1 oard, Plywood Siding ,•t" y aluminum foil faced, glass rein - applied parallel to'2 x 4 wood ed roofing nails,"1 long, in field, 8" o.c. around ide pressure sensitive psum wallboard ap- box nails, 3" long, " glass fiber, 0.97 ediate grade ga galvaniz- d, 6" o.c. els ap- long, nd Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Wood Furring, Foam Plastic Boards, Lightweight Concrete Block 21/4" proprietary aluminum foil faced, glass reinforced iso- cyanurate foam plastic boards applied vertically with V." beads of construction grade adhesive, 16" o.c. (4 per board width) over nominal 8" x 8" x 16" lightweight 2 cell concrete block (55% solid concrete) with %" type N mortar pints. 1" x 2" vertical wood furring 24" o.c. applied over foam plastic boards with 4" x 3 /16" concrete fasteners 24" o.c %" type X gypsum wallboard applied parallel to furring with 6d smooth bright nails 2" long, 0.115" shank, 0.265" head. 8" o.c. with joints taped. Wall loaded to 271 psi. (WAD- BEARING) SKETCH AND DESIGN DATA Fire • Fire Side Sound • Thickness: 43/4" Approx. Weight: 7 psi Fire Test: See WP 3510 Sound Test: See WP 3510 Insulation: See page 6, Section 10.1, Thickness: 53/4," Approx. Wei ,� : 6 psf Fire Test: QSU 6534, 3 -12.79 Fire Side 1114 7/fif/!^lJ9�l� �56644�P!'a02 .sver.�c.s�. v�.aw•aa fO�YJTiH // Thickness: 6 Approx. Weight: 7 psf Fire Test: OSU 6535, 2-28-79 Fire Side Thickness: 11%" Approx. Weight: 37 ps \ Fire Test: OSU 6536, 3 -19.28 ) ` EXTERIOR WALLS Fire Sound GA Rating Rating File STC No. 1 HR 2 HR 35 to 39 WP 8124 (g•w') WP 8125 (g 50 1 54 /' ) JUL 1 r DETAILED DESCRIPTION . LLI, Construction type: Gypsum Wallboard, Gypsum Sheathing, Wood Studs Interior side: One layer 5 4" type X gypsum wallboard or water resistant backer board or veneer base applied parallel with or at right angles to 2 x 4 wood studs, 24" o.c. with 6d coated nails 1%" long, 0.0915" shank, V." heads, 7" o.c. Joints of square edge or bevel edge wallboard may be left exposed. Exterior side: One layer 5 4" type X gypsum sheathing, 48" wide, applied parallel to studs with galv roofing nails, 13" long, 0.120" shank, 7 / 16 " or 1/2" heads, 7" o.c. in field, 4" o.c. perimeter. Wallboard and sheathing nailed to top and bottom plates at 7" o.c. Exterior cladding to be attached through sheathing to studs. (LOAD - BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Polyethylene Film, Wood Studs, Glass Fiber, Foam Plastic Boards, Plywood Siding Interior side; 5 / 8 " type X gypsum wallboard applied over 6 mil polyethylene film and parallel to 2 x 4 wood studs 16" o.c. with 6d smooth bright nails 2" long. 0.115" shank, 0.265" head, 8" \ o.c. Unlaced 3 /8" glass fiber 0.97 pcf friction fit in stud space. 'Exterior side; 1" proprietary aluminum foil faced, glass reinforc- ea'socyanurate foam plastic sheathing applied parallel to studs with \jl ga galvanized roofing nails, 11/2" long, 0.122" shank, 0,428 "head, 12" o.c. in field. 8" o.c. around perimeter. 5 4" plywoods,Oing panels applied parallel to studs with 10d galvaniz- ed commo palls, 3" long, 0.135" shank, 0.307" head, 12" o.c. in field, 6" es., around perimeter. Rating based on the lesser of loading to 2 7 lbs/stud or 83 %io of full design load. (LOAD-BEARING). Construction Type: Fibe Interior base layer 1" proprie forced isocyanurate foam plas studs 16" o,c. with 11 ga galvan 0.122" shank, 0.428" head, 12" perimeter with joints taped with 2" aluminum foil tape. Face layer 5 / type plied parallel to studs with 10d smooth brig 0,128" shank, 0.295" head, 8" o.c. Unfaced 3 Kt friction fit in stud space. Exterior side 1 /2" int fiberboard sheathing applied parallel to studs with ed roofing nails, 1 long,•0.122" shank, 0.428" h in field, 3" o.c. around perimeter. 5 4" plywood siding p plied parallel to studs with Bd galvanized box nails, 2 0.104" shank, 0.255" head, 12" o.c. in field, 6" o.c. ar perimeter. Rating based on the lesser of loading to 2104 lbs/s or 75% of lull design load. (LOAD - BEARING) sum Wallboard, Foam Plastic Boards, ,f d Studs, Glass Fiber, Wood / 1 oard, Plywood Siding ,•t" y aluminum foil faced, glass rein - applied parallel to'2 x 4 wood ed roofing nails,"1 long, in field, 8" o.c. around ide pressure sensitive psum wallboard ap- box nails, 3" long, " glass fiber, 0.97 ediate grade ga galvaniz- d, 6" o.c. els ap- long, nd Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Wood Furring, Foam Plastic Boards, Lightweight Concrete Block 21/4" proprietary aluminum foil faced, glass reinforced iso- cyanurate foam plastic boards applied vertically with V." beads of construction grade adhesive, 16" o.c. (4 per board width) over nominal 8" x 8" x 16" lightweight 2 cell concrete block (55% solid concrete) with %" type N mortar pints. 1" x 2" vertical wood furring 24" o.c. applied over foam plastic boards with 4" x 3 /16" concrete fasteners 24" o.c %" type X gypsum wallboard applied parallel to furring with 6d smooth bright nails 2" long, 0.115" shank, 0.265" head. 8" o.c. with joints taped. Wall loaded to 271 psi. (WAD- BEARING) SKETCH AND DESIGN DATA Fire • Fire Side Sound • Thickness: 43/4" Approx. Weight: 7 psi Fire Test: See WP 3510 Sound Test: See WP 3510 Insulation: See page 6, Section 10.1, Thickness: 53/4," Approx. Wei ,� : 6 psf Fire Test: QSU 6534, 3 -12.79 Fire Side 1114 7/fif/!^lJ9�l� �56644�P!'a02 .sver.�c.s�. v�.aw•aa fO�YJTiH // Thickness: 6 Approx. Weight: 7 psf Fire Test: OSU 6535, 2-28-79 Fire Side Thickness: 11%" Approx. Weight: 37 ps \ Fire Test: OSU 6536, 3 -19.28 E XTERIOR WALLS .f.........++.....,..... :...+r +.:..... .... rr .�.w.'.�:iw.4:...w..r...•+..r.' .:!.:w�.r:,/.......- ., . w.i.,;i�+ �ci�ii ^_1 i Fire Sound GA Rating Rating . L No. DETAILED DESCRIP STC a 1 HR 2 HR 35 to 39 50 to 54 WP 8105 WP 8124 (9m,) WP 8125 (9,w) WP. 201 Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboaril tijorti� lathing, Wood Studs Interior side: One layer 5 / type X gypsum wallboard or water resistant backer board or veneer base applied parallel with or at right angles to 2 x 4 wood studs, 24" o.c. with 6d coated nails 1%" long. 0.0915" shank, 1" heads, 7" o.c. Joints of square edge or bevel edge wallboard may be left exposed. Exterior side: One layer 5 / type X gypsum sheathing. 48" wide, applied parallel to studs with galv roofing nails, 1 long, 0.120" shank, 7 /t6" or 1 /2" heads, 7" o.c. in field, 4" o.c. perimeter. Wallboard and sheathing nailed to top and bottom plates at 7" o.c. Exterior cladding to be attached through sheathing to studs. (LOAD - BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Polyethylene Film, Wood Studs, Glass Fiber, Foam Plastic Boards, Plywood Siding Interior side; 5 /e" type X gypsum wallboard applied over 6 mil polyethylene film and parallel to 2 x 4 wood studs 16" o.c. with 6d smooth bright nails 2" long, 0.115" shank, 0.265" head, 8" `E o.c. Unlaced 3 glass fiber 0.97 pcf friction fit in stud space. 'Exterior side; 1" proprietary aluminum foil faced, glass reinforc- ea •socyanurate foam plastic sheathing applied parallel to studs with".S1 ga galvanized roofing nails, 11" long, 0.122" shank, 0.428' aead, 12" o.c. in field, 8" o.c. around perimeter. 5 /8" plywood ding panels applied parallel to studs with 10d galvaniz- ed commo nails, 3" long, 0.135" shank, 0.307" head, 12" c.c. in field, 6" o, around perimeter. Rating based on the lesser of loading to 232 lbs/stud or 83% of full design load. (LOAD-BEARING Construction 'type: sum Wallboard, Foam Plastic Boards, ./ d Studs, Glass Fiber, Wood oard, Plywood Siding aluminum foil faced, glass rein - applied parallel to'2 x wood ed roofing nails,1 long, in field, 8" o.c. around ide pressure sensitive ypsum wallboard ap- box nails, 3" long, " glass fiber, 0.97 ediate grade Fibe Interior base layer 1" proprie forced isocyanurate foam pies studs 16" o.c. with 11 ga galvan 0.122" shank, 0.428" head, 12" perimeter with joints taped with 2" aluminum foil tape. Face layer %" type plied parallel to studs with 10d smooth brig 0.128" shank, 0.295" head, 8" o.c. Unfaced 3 pcf friction fit in stud space. Exterior side 1/2" int fiberboard sheathing applied parallel to studs with ga galvaniz- ed roofing nails, 1 long :0.122" shank, 0.428" h- .d, 6" o.c. In field, 3" o.c. around perimeter. 5 4" plywood siding p els ap- plied parallel to studs with Bd galvanized box nails, 2 long, 0.104" shank, 0.255" head, 12" o.c. in field, 6" o.c. ar nd perimeter. Rating based on the lesser of loading to 2104 lb or 75% of lull design load. (LOAD - BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Wood Furring, ,.` Foam Plastic Boards, Lightweight ' Concrete Block 21" proprietary aluminum foil faced, glass reinforced iso- cyanurate foam plastic boards applied vertically with Y." beads of construction grade adhesive, 16" o.c. (4 per board width) over nominal 8" x 8" x 16" lightweight 2 cell concrete block (55% solid concrete) with %" type N mortar joints. 1" x 2" vertical wood furring 24" o.c. applied over foam plastic boards with 4" x s/, concrete fasteners 24" o.c. ( .4" type X gypsum wallboard applied parallel to furring with 6d smooth bright nails 2" long, 0.115" shank, 0.265" head, 8'' o.c. with joints taped. Wall loaded to 271 psi. (LOAD - BEARING) SKETCH AND DESIGN DATA Fire Thickness: 5 r Fire Side Thickness: 11%" Approx. Weight: 37 Fire Test: OSU 6536, 31 Sound Thickness: 4 Approx. Weight: 7 psi Fire Test: See WP 3510 Sound Test: See WP 3510 Insulation: See page 6, Section 10.1, Fire Side Approx. Weight: 6 psi Fire Test: OSU 6534, 3-12-79 11110114 Thickness: 61/4" Approx. Weight: 7 psf Fire Test: OSU 6535, 2 -28-79 Fire Side I :%,%a E XTERIOR WALLS .f.........++.....,..... :...+r +.:..... .... rr .�.w.'.�:iw.4:...w..r...•+..r.' .:!.:w�.r:,/.......- ., . w.i.,;i�+ �ci�ii ^_1 i Fire Sound GA Rating Rating . L No. DETAILED DESCRIP STC a 1 HR 2 HR 35 to 39 50 to 54 WP 8105 WP 8124 (9m,) WP 8125 (9,w) WP. 201 Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboaril tijorti� lathing, Wood Studs Interior side: One layer 5 / type X gypsum wallboard or water resistant backer board or veneer base applied parallel with or at right angles to 2 x 4 wood studs, 24" o.c. with 6d coated nails 1%" long. 0.0915" shank, 1" heads, 7" o.c. Joints of square edge or bevel edge wallboard may be left exposed. Exterior side: One layer 5 / type X gypsum sheathing. 48" wide, applied parallel to studs with galv roofing nails, 1 long, 0.120" shank, 7 /t6" or 1 /2" heads, 7" o.c. in field, 4" o.c. perimeter. Wallboard and sheathing nailed to top and bottom plates at 7" o.c. Exterior cladding to be attached through sheathing to studs. (LOAD - BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Polyethylene Film, Wood Studs, Glass Fiber, Foam Plastic Boards, Plywood Siding Interior side; 5 /e" type X gypsum wallboard applied over 6 mil polyethylene film and parallel to 2 x 4 wood studs 16" o.c. with 6d smooth bright nails 2" long, 0.115" shank, 0.265" head, 8" `E o.c. Unlaced 3 glass fiber 0.97 pcf friction fit in stud space. 'Exterior side; 1" proprietary aluminum foil faced, glass reinforc- ea •socyanurate foam plastic sheathing applied parallel to studs with".S1 ga galvanized roofing nails, 11" long, 0.122" shank, 0.428' aead, 12" o.c. in field, 8" o.c. around perimeter. 5 /8" plywood ding panels applied parallel to studs with 10d galvaniz- ed commo nails, 3" long, 0.135" shank, 0.307" head, 12" c.c. in field, 6" o, around perimeter. Rating based on the lesser of loading to 232 lbs/stud or 83% of full design load. (LOAD-BEARING Construction 'type: sum Wallboard, Foam Plastic Boards, ./ d Studs, Glass Fiber, Wood oard, Plywood Siding aluminum foil faced, glass rein - applied parallel to'2 x wood ed roofing nails,1 long, in field, 8" o.c. around ide pressure sensitive ypsum wallboard ap- box nails, 3" long, " glass fiber, 0.97 ediate grade Fibe Interior base layer 1" proprie forced isocyanurate foam pies studs 16" o.c. with 11 ga galvan 0.122" shank, 0.428" head, 12" perimeter with joints taped with 2" aluminum foil tape. Face layer %" type plied parallel to studs with 10d smooth brig 0.128" shank, 0.295" head, 8" o.c. Unfaced 3 pcf friction fit in stud space. Exterior side 1/2" int fiberboard sheathing applied parallel to studs with ga galvaniz- ed roofing nails, 1 long :0.122" shank, 0.428" h- .d, 6" o.c. In field, 3" o.c. around perimeter. 5 4" plywood siding p els ap- plied parallel to studs with Bd galvanized box nails, 2 long, 0.104" shank, 0.255" head, 12" o.c. in field, 6" o.c. ar nd perimeter. Rating based on the lesser of loading to 2104 lb or 75% of lull design load. (LOAD - BEARING) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Wood Furring, ,.` Foam Plastic Boards, Lightweight ' Concrete Block 21" proprietary aluminum foil faced, glass reinforced iso- cyanurate foam plastic boards applied vertically with Y." beads of construction grade adhesive, 16" o.c. (4 per board width) over nominal 8" x 8" x 16" lightweight 2 cell concrete block (55% solid concrete) with %" type N mortar joints. 1" x 2" vertical wood furring 24" o.c. applied over foam plastic boards with 4" x s/, concrete fasteners 24" o.c. ( .4" type X gypsum wallboard applied parallel to furring with 6d smooth bright nails 2" long, 0.115" shank, 0.265" head, 8'' o.c. with joints taped. Wall loaded to 271 psi. (LOAD - BEARING) SKETCH AND DESIGN DATA Fire Thickness: 5 r Fire Side Thickness: 11%" Approx. Weight: 37 Fire Test: OSU 6536, 31 Sound Thickness: 4 Approx. Weight: 7 psi Fire Test: See WP 3510 Sound Test: See WP 3510 Insulation: See page 6, Section 10.1, Fire Side Approx. Weight: 6 psi Fire Test: OSU 6534, 3-12-79 11110114 Thickness: 61/4" Approx. Weight: 7 psf Fire Test: OSU 6535, 2 -28-79 Fire Side 810 FiRE RESISTANCE DIRECTORY FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS (BXUV)— Continued coated (cooler) nails spaced B In. O.C. Joints centered over studs, staggered on oppoah of wall. saeu Canadian Gypsum Co., Ltd. —Types SCX, SHX, WRX. United States Gypsum Compeny —Types SCX, SHX, WRX. 5. head Joints joint joints covered with paper tape and joint compound Nit 8. Laminating Adhesive —Used to bond outer layer of hardboard (Item 7) to Inner layer of gypsum wallboard. Neoprene base general purpose panel adhesive. Applied to beck surface• the outer layer of hardboard with caulking gun producing continuous beads of adhesive �W V. in. wide, '/, in. along the edge of each board and 3 in. long horizontal beads spaceda apart spaced vertically 18 in. O.C, 7, Hardboard — Service grade, 48 In. wide. Min thickness 0.220 in., max thickness 0.265 In density --50 pcf, max density 60 pcf. Attached vertically over inner layer of '/. In, g y p s wallboard (Item 4) with adhesive and 4d finishing nails spaced 24 in. O.C. along the end the vertical edges. 'Bearing the UL Classification Marking Design No. U306 Bearing Wall Rating -1 HR. Finish Rating —See Item 3. i6' 0.C. 1. Nellheede— Exposed or covered with joint compound. 2. Joints— Exposed or covered with fiber tape and Joint compound, except where required for specific edge configuration. For tapered, rounded -edge wallboard, joints covered with loins compound or filler tape and joint compound, As an alternate, nom 3/32 in. thick gypsum vs. neer plaster may be applied to the entire surface of Classified veneer baseboard. Joints rein. forced. 3, Wallboard, Gypsum'-5/8 in, thick wallboard paper or vinyl surfaced, with beveled, square, or tapered edges. Wallboard nailed 7 in. O.C. with 8d cement-coated nails 1.7/8 In. long, 0.0915 In. shank diam and 1/4 in. diam heads. When used In widths of other than 48 in., wallboard Is to be installed horizontally. Canadian Gypsum Co., Ltd. —Types SCX, SHX, WRX (finish rating 26 min), Type C (finish rating 26 min). Colate* Corp. —Type 1, Type SF3 (finish rating 20 min), Type A (finish rating 21 min), Type 8 (finish rating 20 min), Type C (finish rating 21 min) or FRP. Domtar Gypsum —Type C (finish rating 26 min►, Type 4 (finish rating 28 min), Type 5 (finish rating 26 min), Type 6, Type 8 (finish rating 23 min) or Type 9 (finish rst • ing 2e min). Georgie- Pacific Corp., Gypsum Div, —Type GPFS 1 (finish rating 20 min), Type GPFS2 (finish rating 20 min), Type GPFS3 (finish rating 20 min), Type GPFS4 (fin Ish rating 20 min), Type GPFS6 (finish rating 28 min) or Type GPFS.0 (finish rating 20 min.), Gold Bond Building Products —Type FSW (finish rating 20 min), Type FSW -G (finish rating 20 min), Type FSW2 (finish rating 24 min), Type FSW3 (finish rating 20 min), Type FSW4 (finish rating 20 min), Type FSK (finish rating 20 min) or FSK41 (finish rating 20 min). James Hardie Gypsum —Type Fire X (finish rating 26 min)• Type IiI or IV (finish rat- ing 20 min), Types V, VI, VII, VI -WG, VI•ISH (finish rating 23 min). Psbco Oypeum —Type PG-2 (finish rating 20 min), PG -3 (finish rating 20 min), PG* 3W (finish rating 20 min), P0.4 (finish rating 20 mint, PG.6 (finish rating 23 mini, PG.3WS (finish rating 20 min). Republic Gypsum Co, —Type R0•1 (finish rating 20 miry), Type RG.2 (finish rating 20 min), Type R0.3 (finish rating 20 min) or Type R0.4 (finish rating 28 min), Type P0•6 (finish rating 20 min). Standard Gypsum Corp. —Type SGC(flniah rating 20 min.), Type SGC.3(finish rating 20 min.) or SGC-G(finish rating 20 min). Temple-Eaetex Inc. —Types T (finish rating 20 mini, VPB•Type T (finish rating 20 min), WR.Type T (finish rating 20 mini, Type T SHTG (finish rating 20 min), FRX•e• VPBX -8, FRWRX•8. Three Rivets Gypsum. Inc. —Type 3R3 (finish rating 20 min). United States Gypsum Co. —Type SCX (finish rating 28 min), Type C (finish rating 28 mini, Type WRX (finish rating 26 min), Type WR.0 (finish rating 28 min), Type D (finish rating 23 min). Type IP -X I (finish rating 26 min), Type FCV (finish rating 26 min). Type IP.X2 (finish rating 26 min), Type SHX (finish rating 28 mini or Tyr* SHC (finish rating 28 min). Weyerhaeuser Co., Gypsum Div, —Type DEN I (finish rating 20 min), Type 000 (finish rating 20 min), Type 013W3 (finish rating 20 min) or Type D0003 (finish rating 20 min). 4. Steal Corner Fastener -- (Optional) —For use at well corners. Channel shaped, 2 in. long by i in. high on the back side with two 1/8 in. wide cleats protruding into the 5/8 in. wide than• nisi, fabricated from 24 gauge gale steel. Fastener* applied only to the end or cut edge 0 along tapered edges) of the wallboard, no greater than 2 in. from corner of wallboard, mex LOOK FOR MARK ON PRODUCT 2x4's firestopped FiRE FIRE RESISTAN spac 18 in. 0.C. Nailed to a p fastened Corners of wall b 6 S:tts and Blenkete' —(Not Sho Owens — Corning Fib USG Interiors inc. United States Gypsu ,gearing the UL Classification Mark Bea F I, Nalihseda— Exposed or covers 2. Joints of Exposed Boards —Er 3 boards placed vertic / vertically and t applied against the first layer at intermediate studs with 1' A Oeorgla•Paciflo Cot Weyerhaeuser Co., leering the UL Classification Ma s Be I. Wallboard, Gypsum•-1/2 in, long, 0086 In. shank die zontally. As an option, nom : surface of Classified veneer Canadian Oypaun Celotex Corp.—Ty Domtar Gypaum— Georgie.Paciflc Co Gold Bond Buildir James Hardie Gyl Pebco Gypsum Ci Republic Gypsum Standard Gypsun Temple-Ensues In United States Gy Weyerhaeuser Cr 2. Wood Particle Board•-7/1 fastened with 8d, 2 in. long board (or lath). Nail heads fi Weyerhaeuser Co 3. Wood Studs —Nom 2 by 4 4. Bette and Blankets' —(Not USG Interiors Inn United States ON 'Bearing the UL Classification Ma LOOT ' 810 FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS (11XUV)— Continued cored (copier) nails spaced • in. O.C. Joints cantered over studs. staggered on opp. Miss of welL Canadian Gypsum C... Ltd, —Types SCX, SHX, West. United States Gypsum Canpeny —Types SCX, SHX, WRX. 6, illheede— Wallboard joints covered with paper tape and joint compound Joins covered compound I. Laminating Adheelve—Used to bond outer layer of hardboard (hem 7) to inner layer of . gypsum wallboard Neoprene bass general purpose panel adhesive. Applied to beck a R the outer layer of hardboard with caulking pun producing continuous beads of adhesive 1 /. In, wide, '/r in. along the doe of each board and 3 in. long horizontal bead* .paced j apart spaced vertically 18 in. O.C. 7. Hardboard — Service grade, 48 in. wide. Min thickness 0.220 In., max thickness 0.208 in density -50 pet, max density 60 pct. Attached vertically over inner layer of '/. I n, Oy o"". wallboard pram 4) with adhesive and 4d finishing nails spaced 24 In. 0.C. along the Me r the vertical edges. 'gearing the UL Clsselfication Marking Design No. U3015 Bearing Wail Rating -1 HR. Finish Rating —See Item 3. 16 (6' 0.C. 2X4's tirestopped 1. Naliheade— Exposed or covered with joint compound. 2. Joints—Exposed or covered with fiber tape and joint compound, except where required for specific edge configuration. For tapered, rounded-edge wallboard, joints covered with jour compound or fiber tape and joint Compound. As en alternate, nom 3/32 in. thick gypsum are. near plaster may be applied to the entire surface of Classified veneer baseboard. Joints rem. forced. 3. Wallboard. Oypeum' -5/8 In. thick wallboard paper or vinyl surfaced, with beveled. square. or tapered edges Wallboard nailed 7 in. 0.C, with 6d cement•costd nails 1.7/8 in. long 0.0916 in. shank dram and 1/4 in. diem heads. When used In widths of other than 48 in, wallboard is to be installed horixonally. Canadian Gypsum Co.. Ltd —Types SCX, SHX, WRX (finish rating 26 min). Type C (finish rating 28 min). Celotex Corp. —Type t, Type SF3 (finish rating 20 min), Type A (finish rating 21 min). Type S (finish rating 20 min), Type C (finish rating 21 min) or FRP. Oomar Gypsum —Type C (finish rating 26 min), Type 4 (finish rating 28 min), Type 5 (finish rating 26 min), Type 6, Type 6 (finish rating 23 min) or Type 9 (finish rrt ing 26 min). Oeorgle.Pecifio Corp., Gypsum Div.—Type GPFS1 (finish rating 20 min), Type GPFS2 (finish rating 20 min). Type GPFS3 (finish rating 20 mint, Type GPF54 (0n ish rating 20 mint, Type GPFSE (finish rating 28 min) or Type GPFS•C (finish rauns 20 min.). Gold Bond Building Products —Type F5W (finish rating 20 min), Type FSWG (finish rating 20 min). Type FSW2 (finish rating 24 min), Type FSW3 (finish rating 20 min), Type FSW4 (finish rating 20 min), Type FSK (finish rating 20 min) or FSKG (finish rating 20 min). James Hardie Gypsum —Type Fire X (finish rating 20 min), Type In or IV (finish rtes ing 20 min), Types V. VI, VII. V14VG, VI.ISH (finish rating 23 min). Pals= Gypsum —Type PS-2 (finish rating 20 min). PG.3 (finish rating 20 min), PG 3W (finish rating 20 min), PG-4 (finish rating 20 min), PG-8 (finish rating 23 mini. PG-3WS (finish rating 20 min). Republic Gypsum Co. —Type RG•1 (finish rating 20 min), Type R11•2 (finish rating 20 min), Type 50.3 (finish rating 20 min) or Type RG•4 (finish rating 26 min). Type 116-6 (finish rating 20 min). Standard Gypsum Corp. —Type SGC(finish rating 20 min.). Type SGC•3(finish rating 20 min.) or SGC•G(finish rating 20 min). Temple.Easte* Inc. —Types T (finish rating 20 min), VI'S.Type T (finish rating 20 min), WR•Type T (finish rating 20 min). Type T SHTG (finish rating 20 min). FRX-O, VPBX•8, FRWRX•O, Three Rivers Gypsum. Ina —Type 3R3 (finish rating 20 mint United Sates Gypsum Ce. —Type SCX (finish rating 29 min), Type C (finish rating 28 min). Type WRX (finish rating 26 min), Type WR•C (finish rating 26 min), Type 0 (finish rating 23 min). Type IP.X1 (finish rating 28 min), Type FCV (finish rating 20 min). Type lP•X2 (finish rating 28 min), Type 51.0( (finish rating 211 min) or Type SHC (finish rating 28 min). Weyerhaeuser Co.. Gypsum Div —Type DONS (finish rating 20 mini, Type 00G (finish rating 20 min). Type DOW3 (finish rating 20 min) or Type 00003 (fining rating 20 min). 4. Steel Corner Fasteners -- (Optional) —Fa use at will comers Channel shaped, 2 in. long pe t in. high on the back side with two 1/6 in. wide cleats protruding into the 0/8 in. wide chair net, fabricated from 24 gauge gair steel. Fasteners applied only to the end or cut edge I along tapered edges) of the wallboard, no greater than 2 in. from corner of wallboard. mar LOOK FOR MARK ON PRODUCT i FiRE RESISTANT Naelne 18 In. 0.C. Nailed to sl o w fastener. Corners of wall b nt coated nails. ` Mty and Slanketa -41401 Shp! Owens— Corning Fib; USG Interiors Inc. United States Oypeu *wing the UL Classification Mark Bea Fi 1. NNiheada— Exposed or coven 2. Joints of Exposed Soarde —Ex 3. b oards p d van sally / end ti applied against the first layer at intermediate studs with 1% Georgia-Pacific Cor Weyerhaeuser Co.. 'Gearing the UL Classification Mai Be 1. Wallboard. Gypsum•-1/2 � in. long, 0.080 in, shank die thriftily. As an option, nom surface of Classified veneer Canadian Gypeun Celina* Corp. —Ty Domtar Gypsum — Georgle•PaCinc C Gold Bond Buildir James Hsrdlo Oy Pabco Gypsum C Republic Gypsum Standard Gypeun Temple-gum In United States Gy Weyerhaeuser Co 2. Wood Particle Board•-7/' fastened with 0d, 2 in. long board or lath). Nail heeds fi Weyerhaeuser C 3. Wood Studs —Nom 2 by 4 4. Seta and Btankaa• -4Not USG Interiors Iry United States GI 'gearing the UL Classification Mi 1.001 i FAR - CEILING ASSEMBLIES, °STEEL FRAME • } ...• . . -r.. • t . ;;: 's•?. s �,�.y,;..4 i 'Sac .. � ... � , . ,. .. i»t�it,rk Fire Sound GA c , / .. '`„ Rating Rating File STC No. 4 ; ; ; DETAILED DESCRIPTION 1 HR 1 HR SO 45 to 49 60 to 64 FC 4500 (t) f'E ii':iil" Ca; :tEti Construction Type: Steel Channel Joists, Plywood Floor, Gypsum Wallboard Ceiling Double layer 1/2" proprietary type X gypsum wallboard applied at right angles to joists. Base layer attached with 1" type S -12 drywall screws 8" o.c. at butt joints over joists and 12" o.c. in the field. Face layer attached with 11/2" long type G drywall screws 8" o.c. at butt joints between joists and with 1%" type S -12 drywall screws 12" o.c. in the field along joists. Face and base layer edge joints offset. Channel shaped 7" min depth, no. 18 min ga galv steel joists spaced 24" o.c., with 2" x 2" (nom) wood bridging. Flooring: 5 / T &G edge plywood applied at right angles to joists with 1 no. 6 -20 S -12 point screws 6" o.c. around floor perimeter and at plywood end joints and 10" o.c. in field. Refer to gypsum board mfr for UL listed alternate sub and finish flooring systems. FLOOR-CEILING ASSEMBLIES, WOOD- FRAMED Construction Type: Wood Joists, Gypsum Wallboard, Glass Fiber 1 /2" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles to resilient furring channels with 1" type S drywall screws 12" o.c. Wallboard end joints located midway between continuous channels and attached to additional pieces of channel 54" long FC 5010 with screws at 12" o.c. Resilient channels applied 24" o.c. at right angles to wood joists 16" o.c. with 6d coated nails, 1%,4" long, 0.085" shank, 1 /4" heads, two per joist. Wood joists supporting 1 /2" plywood subfloor and 1 cellular or lightweight concrete (92 pcf) over felt. 3 glass fiber batts 0.75 pcf supported by wire rods and furring channels in joist spaces. Sound tested with carpet and pad. SKETCH AND DESIGN DATA Fire ( Sound Approx. Ceiling Weight: 4 ps Fire Test: UL R1319.133 Design L524, 7 -16 -75 55 to 59 Construction Type: Wood Joists, Gypsum Wallboard 1 /2" proprietary type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles to resilient furring channels with 1" type S drywall FC 5105 crews 12" o.c. Resilient channels applied 24" o.c. at right angles (k,o,q) to wood joists 16" o.c. with 6d common nails. Wood joists sup- porting %" plywood and 1" proprietary sanded gypsum underlay - ment. Sound tested using 3 glass fiber in joist spaces and with carpet and pad. FC 5107 (t) Construction Type: Wood Joists, Gypsum Wallboard, Gypsum Floor Underlayment 5 / proprietary type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles to resilient furring channels with 1" type S drywall screws 12" o.c. Wallboard end joints located midway between continuous channels and attached to additional pieces of chan- nel 54" long with screws at 12" o.c. Resilient furring channels spaced 24" o.c. attached with 1V4" type W screws to wood joists 16" o.c. supporting %" plywood subfloor and We 1000 psi sanded gypsum floor underlayment. Approx. Ceil ng Weight:2 psf Fire Test: FM FC 193, 3-15-73 Sound Test: G & H CCA -15 MT, 3.16.73 IIC & Test: (73 C & P) G & H CCA -15 MT, 3.16 -73 Approx. Ceiling Weight: 2 psf Fire Test: UL R6352 Alt. Design L502, 4-21-71 Sound Test: G & H BW -10 MT, 10 -13 -70 IIC & Test: (73 C & P) G & H BW -10 MT, 10.13 -70 Approx. Ce ling Weight: 3 psf Fire Test: UL R1319-65 Design L514, 11 -16-64 Sound Test: 55 Field STC base on ASTM E336 -77, Intest 5-761-3, 12.5.77 1 FLOOR-CEILING ASSEMBLIES, WOOD- FRAMED FLOOR - CEILING ASSEMBLIES, =STEEL 1 HR 1 HR Fire Rating cn Sound Rating STC 45 to 49 55 to 59 FC 5105 (k,o,q). FC 5107 (t) Construction Type: Wood Joists, Gypsum Wallboard ' proprietary type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles to resilient furring channels with 1" type S drywall screws 12" o.c. Resilient channels applied 24" o.c. at right angles to wood joists 16" o.c. with 6d common nails. Wood joists sup- porting %" plywood and 1" proprietary sanded gypsum underlay - ment. Sound tested using 3 glass fiber in joist spaces and with carpet and pad. Construction Type: Wood Joists, Gypsum Wallboard, Gypsum Floor Underlayment %" proprietary type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles to resilient furring channels with 1" type S drywall screws 12" o.c. Wallboard end joints located midway between continuous channels and attached to additional pieces of chan- nel 54" long with screws at 12" o.c. Resilient furring channels spaced 24" o.c. attached with 1 type W screws to wood joists 16" o.c. supporting W plywood subfloor and 2 Y." 1000 psi sanded gypsum floor underlayment. 60 to 64 GA File No. FC 4500 (t) FC 5010 DETAILED DESCRIPTION C r'r ;II Construction Type: Steel Channel Joists, Plywood Floo Gypsum Wallboard Ceiling Double layer 1 /2" proprietary type X gypsum wallboard applied at right angles to joists. Base layer attached with 1" type S -12 drywall screws 8" o.c. at butt joints over joists and 12" o.c. in the field. Face layer attached with 1 long type G drywall screws 8" o.c. at butt joints between joists and with 1%" type S -12 drywall screws 12" o.c. in the field along joists. Face and base layer edge joints offset. Channel shaped 7" min depth, no. 18 min ga galv steel joists spaced 24" o.c., with 2" x 2" (nom) wood bridging. Flooring: 5 /8" T &G edge plywood applied at right angles to joists with 1 no. 6 -20 S -12 point screws 6" o.c. around floor perimeter and at plywood end joints and 10" o.c. in field. Refer to gypsum board mfr for UL listed alternate sub and finish flooring systems. Construction type: Wood Joists, Gypsum Wallboard, Glass Fiber 1 /2" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles to resilient furring channels with 1" type S drywall screws 12" o.c. Wallboard end joints located midway between continuous channels and attached to additional pieces of channel 54" long with screws at 12" o.c. Resilient channels applied 24" o.c. at right angles to wood joists 16" o.c. with 6d coated nails, 1%" long, 0.085" shank, 1 /4" heads, two per Joist. Wood joists supporting 1 /2" plywood subfloor and 1 cellular or lightweight concrete (92 pcf) over felt. 3 glass fiber batts 0.75 pcf supported by wire rods and furring channels in joist spaces. Sound tested with carpet and pad. SKETCH AND DESIGN DATA Fire I Sound Approx. Ceiling Weight: 4 psf Fire Test: UL R1319 -133 Design L524, 7 -16 -75 Approx. Cell ng Weight:2 psf Fire Test: FM FC 193, 3-15-73 Sound Test: G & H CCA -15 MT, 3 -16 -73 IIC & Test: (73 C & P) G & H CCA -15 MT, 3 -16 -73 Approx. Ce ling Weight: psf Fire Test: UL R6352 Alt. Design L502, 4.21.71 Sound Test: G & H BW -10 MT, 10 -13 -70 IIC & Test: (73 C & P) G & H BW -10 MT, 10-13-70 Approx. Ceiling Weight: 3 psf Fire Test: UL R1319-65 Design L514, 11 -16.64 it Sound Test: 55 Field STC base on ASTM E336.77, Intest 5-761-3, 12-5-77 TESTING IirIC :!t rt) ...... . CrTY OF A JUL I ? JR PERMIT CLWYLf 'These numerical Flamespread and Smoke Development ratings do not necessarily reflect the performance of this or any other material under actual fire conditions. ' "Dryvit System (FM)" is available upon request. d ryvi �`� TEST METHOD RESULTS MIL STANDARDS 0 Mildew Resistance 0 Rain Test . 810B E• 5272 (Procedure II) 11.80 lbs. average. Initial weight: Samples showed no deleterious aftereffects. No growth of mildew Weight gain after test 0.25 lbs. Weight gain after 24 hours 0.00 lbs. Weight gain after 48 hours 0.00 lbs. Weight gain after 72 hours 0.00 lbs. CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ❑ Tensile Bond Strength . Pull or load applied through tension - compression hydraulic ram. 39 psi Failure generally occurred in insulation board base material. FEDERAL TEST METHOD STANDARD 141A 0 Absorption - Freeze . O Moisture Resistance O Falling Sand O Satt Spray Resistance O Accelerated Weathering Panels soaked In water ® 20 °C for 4 days, then placed at -10 °C for 2 hours and +20 ° C for 2 hours. 6201 6191 6061 6151 60 cycles. Total weight gain of 6.2 grams. No checking, cracking and splitting. 14 days exposure. No deleterious effects. 500 liters. No deleterious effects. 5% salt concentration. 300 hours. 2000 hours. FIRE TESTING' . 0 "Tunnel Test" (Underwriter's Laboratories, Inc.) O Full Scale End Use Configuration Fire Test 0 Diversified Fire Test O Full Scale Mutti•Story Fire Test O Full Scale Mutti•Story Are Test ❑ Standard Fire Exposure Test UL -723 (ASTM E-84) Factory Mutual Corner Test' Modified ASTM E -108 1500+ crib -- Culver City, CA 1250 crib -- Independent . Research laboratoN *Son Antonio, Texas ASTM E -119 Flame Spread 5' Fuel Contributed 0 Smoke Developed 0' Approved as described in Factory Mutual Approval Guide. Zero Fire Hazard No flame spread within or on the surface of test panels. No lateral spread of flame from comportment of fire origin to adjacent spaces. Fire resistance rating of one -hour and two-hour wall assemblies wos not reduced by the addition of Dryvit Outsulation System. TESTING IirIC :!t rt) ...... . CrTY OF A JUL I ? JR PERMIT CLWYLf 'These numerical Flamespread and Smoke Development ratings do not necessarily reflect the performance of this or any other material under actual fire conditions. ' "Dryvit System (FM)" is available upon request. d ryvi �`� c BUILDING CODES Building code authorities are charged with developing and administering guidelines for systems and products to insure the protection of public health, safety and welfare, Regulations affecting the Dryvit® Outsulation® System are found In various sections refer- encing building usage, type of construction, structural loads and fire performance, The insulation component of Outsulation is addressed specifically by each code as noted In the following listing: THE BOCA BASIC /NATIONAL BUILDING CODE Evaluation Report 78.98 SBCCI STANDARD BUILDING CODE . Compliance Report 72203 ICBO UNIFORM BUILDING CODE Research Report 2728 Metropolitan Dade County, Florida California State Fire Marshal's Office New York State City and County of San Francisco HUD - U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development Dept. of Health and Human Services City of Phoenix, Arizona City of Mobile, Alabama City and County of Denver, Colorado State of Connecticut Zoning Code of the City of Coral Gables, Florida City of Jacksonville, Florida City of Baltimore, Maryland State of Rhode Island Texas State Board of Insurance State of Wisconsin Province of Toronto Province of Quebec Province of Alberta Province of British Columbia City of Vancouver, British Columbia Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation *11421 City of New York, MEA 067-87-M TESTING 'These numerical Fiamespreod and Smoke Development ratings do not necessarily reflect the performance of this or any other material under actual fire conditions. ' " Dryvft System (FM)" is available upon request. fl r: Aif D c, rY G4: JUL 1'7 12:;'' FEhrwrr cr-NTER TEST METHOD RESULTS MIL STANDARDS ❑ Mildew Resistance 0 Rain Test 810B E -5272 (Procedure II) 11.80 lbs. average. Initial weight: Samples showed no deleterious aftereffects. -No growth of mildew Weight gain after test 0.25 lbs. Weight gain after 24 hours 0.00 lbs. Weight gain after 48 hours 0.00 lbs. Weight gain after 72 hours 0.00 lbs. CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH INSTITUTE 0 Tensile Bond Strength Pull off loud applied through tension — compression hydraulic tam. 39 psi Failure generally occurred in insulation board base material. FEDERAL TEST METHOD STANDARD 141A 0 Absorption - Freeze • 0 Moisture Resistance ❑ Falling Sand ❑ Salt Spray Resistance ❑ Accelerated Weathering Panels soaked in water ® 20 °C for 4 days, then placed at -10°C for 2 hours and +20 °C for 2 hours. 6201 6191 6061 6151 60 cycles. Total weight gain of 6.2 grams. No checking, cracking and splitting. 14 days exposure. No deleterious effects. 500 liters. No deleterious effects. 5% salt concentration. 300 hours. 2000 hours. FIRE TESTING' • • 0 "Tunnel Test" (Underwriter's Laboratories, Inc.) ❑ Full Scale End Use Configuration Fire Test ❑ Diversified Fire Test O Full Scale Multi•Story Fire Test O full Scale Multi•Story Fire Test ❑ Standard Fire Exposure Test UL -723 (ASTM E•84) Factory Mutual Corner Test' Modified ASTM E•108 1500* crib — Culver City, CA 1250 crib — Independent Research Laboratory, San Antonio, Texas ASTM E -119 . Flame Spread 5' Fuel Contributed 0 Smoke Developed 0' Approved as described In Factory Mutual Approval Guide. Zero Fire Hazard No flame spread within or on the surface of test panels. No lateral spread of flame from compartment of fire origin to adjacent spaces. Fire resistance rating of one -hour and two-hour wall assemblies was not reduced by the addition of Dryvl Outsulation System. • TESTING 'These numerical Fiamespreod and Smoke Development ratings do not necessarily reflect the performance of this or any other material under actual fire conditions. ' " Dryvft System (FM)" is available upon request. fl r: Aif D c, rY G4: JUL 1'7 12:;'' FEhrwrr cr-NTER BUILDING CODES Building code authorities are charged with developing and administering guidelines for systems and products to insure the protection of public health, safety and welfare. Regulations affecting the Dryvite Outsulatlon® System are found in various sections refer- encing building usage, type of construction, structural loads and fire performance. The insulation component of Outsulatlon Is addressed specifically by each code as noted in the following listing: THE BOCA BASICINATIONAL BUILDING CODE Evaluation Report 78.98 SBCCI STANDARD BUILDING CODE Compliance Report 72203 ICBO UNIFORM BUILDING CODE Research Report 2728 PROVALS Metropolitan Dade County, Florida California State Fire Marshal's Office New York State City and County of San Francisco HUD - U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development Dept. of Health and Human Services City of Phoenix, Arizona City of Mobile, Alabama City and County of Denver, Colorado State of Connecticut Zoning Code of the City of Coral Gables, Florida City of Jacksonville, Florida City of Baltimore, Maryland State of Rhode Island Texas State Board of Insurance State of Wisconsin Province of Toronto Province of Quebec Province of Alberta Province of British Columbia City. of Vancouver, British Columbia Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation #11421 City of New York, MEA #67-87-M .......gyp OCCUPANT LOAD EXITING REQUIREMENTS Plan Review PROJECT 44- © E< CD ` T_.S .� C. - 1 ADDRESS CoGt�C" - , ��QowcaN"l Ela UJ , DATE 4 - ( ► ct(� OCCUPANCY GROUP * Em p L aw , aZaCeraiatO rilJC o, K PART V, CHAPTER 23, U.Q.C. - W.S.E.C. CHAPTER 51 -10, W.A.C. CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D/ •11►AI /AIR nlvIcInw M (L q0 -132 X33 •- I34 -� 133 13(0 ct TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION V LOCATION ON PROPERTY 16 SEP 40 1 FOR-- I - fig P12111"; , G ' / NO. S 1D N l O F ff , <1•( 1:34.1::q A I (34. j E5 BUILDIN 2- ' 11 T-Al- FLOOR AREA 561 4 Glesr AcT 2 /Is = 15 E/`I c 1 cra, " =Of- DETAILED REQUIREMENTS OCCPANCY 1�( 4r L -IMr<s OF 244o 5fo o 2. re., QMS, % � (+-+L NSTQ.. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 6 (61A .._. 4 0 -- 2 a6 100 tz- SA Rim 12(oO prepared by: , PLAN CHECK UMBER •► L �D b ,( .l> L = 54 . CZ)eicrr5 REED (3) Rzoc)ip D. ✓ o . K. A _t = Mill u eECTroN .o - TczaJE L ,,14 e � �cti , e w e s �. ma c . c ° s o p acs j,n <. l u .. ONE __ K. . \DO V- CITY OF T UKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD. TUKWILA. WASHINGTON 981$N TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Aufmt-fitimti 6-t- -74,F r 1 MEMORANDUM PHONE M /206) 433.1600 Gary L VanDwun. Mayor • • - - - - • • ' • 11 414 . . AI "A*0 k. ..I k . . / . J.L T: . . . / • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • g lb � ' ._� ..� ... / il.:...A / I / u. ..I /LI- . i4�1.rA l •rl l )AAAAD City of Tukwila FIRE DEPARTMENT 444 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 -7661 (206) 575-4404 Fire Department Review Control Number 90 -132 (513) Re: Homewood Suites Building #A -1 - 6965 Southcenter Blvd. Dear Sir: August 3, 1990 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor The attached set of building plans have been reviewed by The Fire Prevention Bureau and are acceptable with the following concerns: 1. The total number of fire extinguishers required for your establishment is calculated at one extinguisher for each 3000 sq. ft. of area. The extinguisher(s) should be of the "All Purpose" (2A, 10 B:C) dry chemical type. Travel distance to any fire extinguisher must be 75' or less. (NFPA 10, 3 -1.1) (UFC 10 -1 (3 -1)) Extinguishers shall be installed on the hangers or in the brackets supplied, mounted in cabinets, or set on shelves (NFPA 10, 1 -6.6), and shall be installed so that the top of the extinguisher is not more than 5 feet above the floor. (NFPA 10, 1 -6.6) (UFC 10.301) Extinguishers shall be located so as to be in plain view (if at all possible), or if not in plain view, they shall be identified with a sign stating, "Fire Extinguisher," with an arrow pointing to the unit. (NFPA 10, 1 -6.3) (UFC 10.301) A 40 BC rated dry chemical fire extinguisher is required to be installed near the food processing equipment. (UFC 10.313(d)) Commercial -type food heat - processing equipment from which grease -laden vapors emanate in normal cooking application shall be protected by an approved automatic extinguishing system. The extinguisher City of Tukwila FIRE DEPARTMENT 444 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 -7661 (206) 575-4404 Page number 2 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor system shall be interconnected to the fuel and current supply so that the fuel or current is automatically shut off to all equipment under the hood when the system is actuated. (UFC 10.313) 2. Exit hardware and marking must meet the requirements of Uniform Fire Code Sections 12.104 & 10.402(a). Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. (UFC 12.104b) Exit signs shall be installed at required exit doorways and where otherwise necessary to clearly indicate the direction of egress. Signs shall be of a contrasting color with the surrounding area and shall have letters not less than six inches high with a minimum letter width of 3/4 ". (UBC 3314) (UFC 12.108) Exit doors shall swing in the direction of exit travel when serving an occupant load of 50 or more. (UBC 3304(b)) Exits serving more than 50 occupants shall be provided with illuminated exit signs. (UFC 12.108(d)) Exits shall be illuminated at any time the building is occupied. An emergency system shall automatically provide exit illumination upon failure of the main power supply. (UFC 12.107(a)(b)) Any room having an occupant load of more than 50 where fixed seats are not installed, and which is used for classroom, assembly or similar purpose, shall have the capacity of the room posted in a conspicuous place on an approved sign near the main exit from the room. (UFC 25.114a) Panic hardware is required on all assembly area exit doors (UFC 25.106) Page number 3 City of Tukwila FIRE DEPARTMENT 444 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 -7661 (206) 575 -4404 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor 3. An approved fire alarm system is required per City Ordinance #1327. An approved automatic sprinkler system may be installed in lieu of a fire alarm system. (Plans must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation.) Local UL Central Station supervision is required. (City Ordinance *1327) Remote indicator lights are required on all above ceiling smoke detectors. (UFC 10.301) Remote alarm and trouble annunciation indication is required if the control panel is not visible from the main entrance. (NFPA 72A, 2- 4.4.1) (UFC 10.301) Key box - When access to or within a structure or an area is unduly difficult because of secured openings or where immediate access is necessary for life- saving or fire- fighting purposes, the Chief may require a key box to be installed in an accessible location. The key box shall be a type approved by the Chief and shall contain keys to gain necessary access as required by the Chief. (UFC 10.209) A satisfactory contract covering the maintenance, operation and efficiency of the system shall be provided by the property owner. The contract shall provide for periodic inspection and tests, for proper maintenance service, and for service following operation of the system and shall be acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction. (NFPA 72A, 2 -3) (UFC 10.301) H.V.A.C. units rated at 2,000 cfm require auto- shutdown devices. These devices shall be separately zoned in the alarm panel and local U.L. Central Station supervision is required. Fire suppression systems for commercial food preparation hood systems shall be supervised through City of Tukwila FIRE DEPARTMENT 444 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 -7661 (206) 575 -4404 Page number 4 the fire alarm system. Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor 4. Your street address must be conspicuously posted on the building and shall be plainly visible and legible from the street. Numbers shall contrast with their background. (UFC 10.208) Fire hydrants are required as detailed in City Ordinance #729. Every exterior portion of a building must be within 300' of a fire hydrant, measured around the perimeter of the building. (City Ordinance #729) Every building shall be accessible to Fire Department apparatus by way of access roadways with all- weather driving surface of not less than 20' wide and 13'6" vertical clearance. Access roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with an approved turn- around area. Access shall be within 150' of all portions of the building. (UFC 10.207 as amended) The dyke road on the east side of this property is part of the fire access road system for this complex. Provide a road which meets the requirements of U.F.C. 10.207 and City Ordinances. This road shall be 20' wide and an all- weather surface. The access road shall have fog lines and shell be illuminated. All hydrants and all surface access roads shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of construction (UFC 10.301) All required occupancy separations, area separation walls, and draft -stop partitions shall be maintained and shall be properly repaired, restored or replaced when damaged, altered, breached, penetrated, removed or improperly installed. (UFC 10.401) An approved hose station requires plans review. (Plans must be submitted to the Fire Marshal for cc: T.F.D. file ncd City of Tukwila FIRE DEPARTMENT 444 Andover Park East Tukwila, Washington 98188 -7661 (206) 575 -4404 Page number 5 approval prior to installation.) (City Ordinance #1528) The following items are requirements for your building: (A) Provide installation specifications for the fireplace in the great room. Yours truly, The Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor All interior wall covering materials shall be fire- resistive or shall be treated to be fire - resistive, so as to result in a flame- spread rating as required by UFC Appendix VI - tables 42A and 42B. A certificate of the flame spread rating is required to be delivered to the Tukwila Fire Department. (UBC 4204) (UFC 10.401) (Where the wall finish is fabric or paper, provide a document with the I.C.B.O. flame spread rating and installation instructions.) (B) Post the second story storage rooms as storage areas. (C) Obtain a welding permit from the fire department if field welding or other hot work is anticipated. City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 FAX TRAN DATE/TIME: 4.w -RO 6.6.te4 re-16•46 TO: Name (Company Name FROM: �w� PHONE NO: �/��/ / SUBJECT: PAGE(s): (+ Cover Sheet) (FAX // 5C: GUM. FAX 4l: 433 -1833 3la /est- soli$ areeLRAd Om sa A !L 840Ci'S COMMENTS: re Iota Ag 'Tartu RaspoND m • em . NP RE&4Mir Two C pia op leol gi0 DR4Ct IN4S OTC. /HFZRE ATACN► ReAti14g0. ? A N REV/gril) W I L L d a v I n E 1 . 9 0 A 1 'MCor o f CIS /#, eMArION • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development - Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 (206) 433 -1849 'ROJECT ilawatothr) ADDRESS )ATE TRANSMITTED THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS AND /OR CLARIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE PLAN REVIEW. ITEM • . • . YEW • A i i • .. -. Mil �• I. .z ''! ! 4 // S c.. it. j a • . • .�►�� . ♦- . / l... -1 . %:. _ - G • . ior riFrp. 14 ICJ . 1 ♦ . I :3- Ad A r. • ♦. .lam .J a •►�,,. ' at A • • • - , .Al a • ( s a . S ° 1 O. r 40 i A!, i - ...4 _ /. r. . - - .1•2• E.1413 sr LG AtoAmAir &JItb,M , t r ue. t, K- - , siE 3X � e 1b" O1C 2�C(� a uou -' -per:rime. >s? etys . ware , u•PA••• 'A Awa_z -R-5 • CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED COMMENT PLAN CHECK NUMBER •14Ear 1 op 3 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development - Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 (206) 433 -1849 PROJECT 1DDRESS )ATE TRANSMITTED THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS AND /OR CLARIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE PLAN REVIEW. ITEM ►lll•Lillt.• +l All _ • • '. a • • P•• 1E17 AL • • • i • • • - 1 . • i,. • r &. r ♦ o.: 5' • • AM or . ., _ . .- • ' . I .' - L., k t'i• t`. ' . l- e e_t._ • • IL •. .• r V . r.\ I ! 1•. alb '. • 4 .. - AA (_ '1► Ale • J .011 • S. 4liger A4.Z IsegaZEtil voe ALL UmOEe -ST14t USES. d Lt1/4- pieboIDE H • TE oN 1740114 i D A w N lc U peovt of Accuss lb l- t}Qa yea, Codo C( S Au. Lama /le e • 4 ..SAMB3. DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED 13. 4S EST Act. l S .1" 146rE L• COMMENT CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT prepared by: PLANNING DIVISION PLAN CHECK NUMBER ..ET 2 * TeAtIs° t4orE DN PI At tsr Melon of - t4teEEs !• l eL.DC16 • CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development - Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 (206) 433-1849 PROJECT 14DM *.0600 dsOrries Oars ADDRESS DATE TRANSMITTED THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS AND /OR CLARIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE PLAN REVIEW. ITEM 1 • t • • 2 4 _ .J _ . 1„ • ' _411 0. • 4 I!- `I \all ✓ , L !4 J ` - r O. ► • ■ � I � � • fr P 411111167177211115:A-_, LA 11 • / (•, r�r V • ,,t om cbe. Lt • _ .. _ IL It dm.,. r -_ DATE RESPONSE RECEIVED COMMENT 'MAD o f Nu4tpAt tilt Nq Fl¢e. REFstSTlOE a It ECAME0 L461+T ttcar &)LSS. OW Ma wau. sr�au wt 4t3, +staE o+., STOpptJq OQACE CJ1Tf1tN 'pARTM W4U.S- w►TEAAU41 • CODE efiChtitE iEt1Ts. V IVIA '. S a Tata l LOM - LI 'SF}r.,D. • • & 4D Stbt4AutLI E • CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION ��b A��ecphs� �utsH cap prepared by: PLAN CHECK NUMBER 6146ET 3 *a 3 0 ► tt er Alai "Fout6g CALL OUT Pat RAM �rz 'MU MUM' tN • 41t10 X ! " 'SI#tMA) l4&3 TI4IS LOtt1, Q Iliefi SUMS 'm 6E Siltwa .-t Ot W. 6 Mee Cot PA1EAggig •,aCt U 65. ... 0 C Framing Ratio (if applicable) Material 113 Chapter 7 SKETCH OF ELEMENT Summation R Values U - 1/R Form 7.3 U /UA CALCULATION FOR PLAN SUBMITTAL Page 2 of 3 Element: Note: Make copies of this form for every building element. Thickness R /In R Value R value Inches Thickness Solid Cavity U Value for Element (Avg.) sa Area of Element* * Area of Element is net area after openings such as doors, windows and skylights have been subtracted. 1988 Assembly From Tabl U Value" Are (Sq. Ft.) U x A UxAxOT Wall Ceiling /Roof Floor 1988 Slab Perimeter Insulation" Chapter 7 Form 7.3 U /UA CALCULATION FOR PLAN SUBMITTAL Page 3 of 3 Address: From Tables 4 -2, 4 -3, 4 -4, Washington State Energy Code U(1) Wall Windows Doors Roof Ceiling Skylights Floor Assembly Area(1) PROPOSED TOTAL (2) UxA UxAxOT Slab Perimeter Insulation (3) 1 R— (1) Calculated (2) Proposed total must be equal to or less than the criteria total (3) Must be equal to or greater than criteria R — Value THERMAL PERFORMANCE CRITERIA Heat Type: 0 Electric Resistance Climatic Zone: Other 114 CRITERIq .TOTAL Energy Code 1 II PROPOSED DESIGN .^" CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTIICENTER /BOULEVARD. TUK1171.A, WASHINGTON 98188 April 11, 1990 Mark Hansen Dimension Development Company, Inc. P.O. Box 795 200 Front street (71457) Natchitoches, LA 71458 -079 Re: Homewood Suites Dear Mark, PHONE 11 (206) 433.1800 Cary L. 1 anDusrn, Jlayur The purpose of this letter is to address several outstanding issues which need to be resolved prior to issuance of your Building Permit. * Landscape Revision Requirements The revisions which are required address conditions required by the Planning Commission as well as changes due to the placement of utilities, fire equipment, drainage swales and rip -rap areas which were not incorporated into the initial design of the landscaping as shown on the current plan. Revise the Landscape Plan to provide: 1) The inclusion of trees along the north property line 2) The inclusion of trees along the east side of Building E -5 adjacent to the trail on the building side. 3) Remove the wheelstops and extend the extruded curb an additional two feet around the parking lot perimeter where curb /wheelstops are provided adjacent to a regular size parking stall. Retain wheel stops and curbing for handicap and compact stalls. Provide appropriate landscaping. 4) Coordination of landscaping materials with placement of utilities, drainage swales, rip -rap areas, fire hydrants, light fixtures and any other above or below ground elements located within landscaping areas. Areas must be screened with shrub materials - allow enough space for access and screening. (This will require coordination with your civil engineer and the utilities company). 5) Delete parking spaces at far lower east end of parking lot adjacent to the trail /access road entry and provide appropriate landscaping. 6) Match grades with adjacent properties and indicate on plan. 7) Grasscrete as shown on plan at entries to trail /fire access road. Rolled curb to be installed as shown at * Lighting Plan The lighting plan should indicate placement and function of parking lot and building light fixtures. The bases of . light poles will be at or below existing grade or screened by dense shrub plantings. Sections and detail drawings of poles and fixtures should be included. * Lot Consolidation On the Civil plans the property is described as "Lot 2 and 3 of Tukwila Short Plat No. 88 -1 -SS, recorded under King County Recording No. 8807210416; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington ". A review of the files did not provide evidence that a lot consolidation had been accomplished. I have attached an application form which explains the process. If you have completed a lot consolidation, please provide me with documentation. I hope this has been helpful in clarifying the remaining requirements. Please notathat the Building Permit will not be issued until these requirements are satisfied. Please call if you . have questions. Sincerely, Molly Sal. Headley Assistant Planner City of Tukwila cc: Phil Fraser, Tukwila Public Works, Bob Benedicto, Tukwila Building Review Dale Roper, Landscape Architect Ed McHugh, Architect File TO: PROM: DATE: SUBJECT: (10 /T2.MEMO) CI t of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 1206) 433.1800 Gary L. Vanousen, Mayor MEMORANDUM 'YYl alecxn t, l.0_50`1 vo 2 hQ. \\\Q 1 - S r 1(.'c c Fri 0 RQrn42.1)iooc .1 1--1 a e 1 Svildinc5) J Zia do )r (J2 onl3 l3.13• C- l cl% Ed'A-\ on . TO: PROM: DATE: SWW.JECT: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 OM 433.1800 Gary L. Vanousen, Mayor Ilk-e_ "Bogs ' rflo.rch IQ Ici Hnlerlf2 i ocx 5u ec4 c. 5 • \IMuortion O Con * *rucJ1on bred on a et• 4 co x 0.v6 - So ala C 5 E �1 u� x 50.<No r 4 oo 4 Uatuod'on W tt_ g5 (l0 /T2.MEMO) 1> 56 MEMORANDUM r Sir l �l •S 12 4 •.gJ - A$ ti (p(o rn x So .Tto = as `7 , I N I Val uo i o n 6? I, 1-1Q 1 k S. S(o = 4) 3aLI vouum-ion 0 L V Uotion (0, 1%4° x So . %(o =-4 3 {N,51 % \ Muation 9, QS X 50 . U t z : 504 , q � V o11 vcd-ion og og oo' :01111 1 e co 1, g �� .. u(D)- onion oG 0G• h Go 'Got, ao h'cQ' oo. LG I e Uo,.. , n\ , n .. bgb v0 i i °11 ' 1 00 uoRo r'ror u o 1d th AND ,-) uNou CVIG ..... ................. . . ........... -A- ho0. %e h : �. oG 0 11L_, ()).) co (Ng (O1 QO. SLI Og' b oa ao..;. ilc0( 6 ..._. uo r o ogh 00 • G0 b !-1-W P U) AOL1J ing kyou }�t�u.►ad q19 ing - .1.‘""aa b ',hog _ - acxot4 - j ins ›Patir3 uo 9,lG ill l _. X0 A rig uo1d _ A -.1�u -A -t3 l _ flhL sad -icy ?Qom-au), CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 MEMORANDUM PHONE # (200) 433.1800 To: Ed McHugh, Architect From: Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner Department of Community Development Date: December 3, 1991 RE: Review of Homewood Suites Colors and Materials. Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor This memorandum is to confirm my earlier separate discussions with you and John Hendrickson regarding the proposed changes to the BAR approved building colors and materials. The proposed color changes are requested because the originally approved teal window frames are not commercially available, the developer has already purchased white window frames as part of a Puget Power energy conservation program, and the remaining original teal accent colors no longer provide the same level of visual integration approved by the BAR. The proposed revisions submitted on November 15th would provide a roughly equivalent level of visual integration with the following changes: 1. change the teal roof facia and top rails to the white of the window frames, doors and railings, and 2. build up the "licorice tint" vertical accent columns 2 -3 inches from the flat wall plane, to match the same colored base which extends beyond the wall by 2 -3 inches. This package of colors and materials is herewith approved to modify the BAR approved design. This approval is based on the physical inability to reasonably provide the BAR approved design and the applicant's provision of a reasonable equivalent level of visual (color) integration. Per your request, I am willing to review a field application of the color design originally submitted on November 15th. This could occur once a building was completely prepared. However, any such deviation from the colors and materials as approved above or by the BAR, is at the applicant's sole risk and not approved by this department I should also note that the department Director and several staff members spent. some time evaluating the original proposal and chose not approve it without the above modifications. Please feel free to contact me at 206- 431 -3684 if I can be of further help. Sincerely, Vernon Umetsu, Assoc. Planner cc: Beeler /Pace /Hendrickson /file file:b:hmwd.clr � � � ``� ��� �� ���� ����� ���� ��� � ~c_ �~ � 0 �N��o��� 0. Id ;.,,, ,.., ,,,, ;,.., ,..: 'kg 44 left , 41 riii N III ilk !BOA il PrI CI P o~a ' � ogoinr5.3,A La e 01• Tin :77 IPSA p tAr 4 „4 .71 ,7 e :61 1:i i.■IL4 11110 4 ,11r4 10 11,,16 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA J UL 2 PERMIT CENTER I f / |"'n | ' | ' '. ' '['1` ' [ + i` ^ r ^ |` ' |`'p',^r • /` ' p . p r / / n`, '`/ I O °~^ - ~ 1 ' 2 3 4 � 5 6 H ' � ' � '� FLEXIBLE RULER ^o,^n=..~. oC ^z m /2 oc uu m o o .n oE 61 m u 91 u ° m u u 0L L./ | / | . | . | . | / | | | | . | . | / . / � / � . /mmmmmmmxmmmom�mmmmmmmmmUmNmUmNNmUmUm/|mUmNxUm|km|mUm||no|xxhn�m|m|||Nkmh|U|m/km|w|�x�/ IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT Section A - A ' y� /�( �b'� y� /�( �b'� Plant Materials List " . ebn .0 Sarno ore,tv ,~~~ . . ~~UT �� � ��� w. ^■ ` � II 14 ..,. NOTES: °~ Shrub Planting D•^°u ^^' ���%717t fo' Magma, ' ,. � r,°° Planting o•^°m ^Cavr 77a,~'etuY• SO ==°;= 77pleon 2 , m=°~*l2 ee' °~sts~ Oar* EirrAw■ ar�� ��.���e�'°K� � _ --_ ' --- Da^ BatAer/ Cm* a��� awn 47 An:m~ ~ � Fkund CAN, Atoro/2.74.47-Morwv• '.=. ".,.,^.,."/,. in. ^.-.. ".^..^."..`". " t • .`".� ^ ,.�,"....^" . ^^ ",,,,.,.".~.` ... ". .� � . � , |�..��/����"�� / ��,^� I ' �' ' �� ��" ����"| '''�.��'�.!^�.�� . ' .� '' `. I. `"'` ^'' "`'/"` ` '^''~'' ^'`^ ~~•�""^/ ~ '^`,. ` .. � �� �|^"� ' /^ `"^�/ '~'"`�^. ^^` ' "^� `^' ^-� ^~*~ 111. ,`... .~ [��"^." �� '^ ^"^"' 11 ^^ ~' '"`~' `'' '/^^' "^"`/ ft. '^`^~ ~'' ^^^~•. ' ' ~ ^,'`'` "r'~°' ' ' ^ ~`� ."/ ,. °^ `"`.^.+ "' . ,.. "". ". ,`.,. ,.^". " ..'"./..^"^, 111.11., ^'..,..,~^. /^•/ A'^^ /^^'. "''.111..,.", /... t... ' , / ^ " ' ^ ' ^ 'he /^ It It p' ^'• '.^./,`^"`.^. 1.111 1 .. ^ .' ^, ~^'`~..^..``.^^"^.`..`^ ". .�.., ., ^.,"/ '^.."..^. (It "`^^.`.` ^'...'"..`" `. .,�—,,.^,..°.''.�`^^. ..�. .�.^• . .".-.`. ...`".^/.~^.. I .'".^^...... ^ .• ^". . ,^.`/ 1 ,. ...^'^.^.`'.^./.. 11~1 F. i 111/ . ,•• ' '.".,.`..~..' , " ^^ .,...... /�^....�`". `�. .^ .~^.. ...`.," ."""~.� 1 •^~^�'''"^^ '� '~�"/ ^''^''^''`'``�"�r^/•• .... °````.... The ,,r '^^. "' ^ ''' ' ^''''^� `^' °` p '� '^`'.°, ^` "^��^`^... .,,,°..... ...`...° ,`.,°.�~,°.� ""*~`~ .".^/'^. ,." Ili^".+./...' .^'. ^" ..^~.. ■• .^.^ `^^./ .` "111*/," "— .^`.^.^~ .' ..~^'. .`..~ — .`,^ ^. "/~, . be "w''''` ", "^ ^ ^/` r111 ^^" . ,*• ~.° "" .. .1111p1 . ` � ,`` I. In c://:-..• .1 ,^^. ^.. ^..,./,,.,`~ `II, ,,, `^^`. .� TI° ,.".,^.`.' ^14.1 1110 ^ ` .^' .^ .="* ,"^.".^. ^".. .; � All . .�� ��.^���.^ .11 Ai.., , .����.,�~' . ^...^~, we.. ,."^`.^'^.~•.... tut ., .,.....,... 18. Thu ., ..,." .°.. °^`^ .'~ ^ ^~v .� ' °'" ^^^l I ^ "^'`~ ~^ . .'". `/» ^,~..—".° ^.. "^"^'`^""^^~'" '^�,"..,..w/ ~.~°.^`.�..".. ..^ ... —.--. . � . . .� --^ ,—. -- �—._. ~.�^.. ..�`~. `,. ''^"... `^^// bl• ,~._••` ^ . ^ "' ,.•" /o. I .^.".. /.." ~.` ^~`` ., .`~^. .' ~ ",,.,,. ^ " ~`^ ^` t 1' ''' " "~ ," — " / ,' .,(111 o. .. °., .., w. / ",^,_+", .~`^,~^. ^"., ."'",..,"`..^`^.+/11 /•. ^../.`.^~"./°,^^ . ^" ,a1111• / ." ./.,, .....=°. ./' °.' .., ,,.� ./ a/ ,/.".. ^^.// I. .°. ./".� ^. ^.� ' '�. ■' '' '^' '"/ ^"^ '^ 'o° °.'. ".'.^`^'''"..`.^ v. Ito .."°.... In) ,~^^,^/`~,~^. '.,,,...,.,`• '^° °'1,1~. ' '(1/11 1"./I r t .."`/ ^ ..'. 1 ' .'/.`.,,��.` .`,. , Revisions NO. DL:128IPTION/ __________ DESIGNED DRAWN__ CHEC DATE.CE_ | �� Sheet: Li of wN 0._ OMEL&D9 SuiThS �-A lE c --- (007 I r i I i l rj i11 111111i_1_111111_illlr(} I I I - iil :: "..,:. O t. TH. INCH 1 i 2 3 I CI -1 l �.�.il�rl ,•I - 4 5 Q N •SWe Nlex'i1E: oa sue or 'Wne X200 r 12 k M I N G ILL A N' I /qtr sc,At l_ P SHOP DRAWING REVIEW RESPOCNSE REQUIRED Of. ARCHITECT'S REVIEW Rejected ❑ No exceptions take/ Comments ❑ Note markings U. Architect's review Is for general conformance with the design concept and con - Attached 1 tract documents. Markings or comments shall not be construed a s relieving the plans and specifications, nor depar- responsible for details and accuracy, for tunes h from The Contractor with the prefect 1..1.•rlc r cures ing a therefrom. The Contracl q remains and performing for his work fn a t to confirming and correlating all quantities and dlmmrslnns, for selccllnC processes, for techniques of assembly, and for p St manner. By 7 Confirm • Resubmit ❑ IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT f3'-o" -r© Fad CITY OF TUK4ViLA APPROVED OCT 119:1 BUILDING DIVISION DATE HOME.\N b / .? SUITS / ! $IIOII DRAWINGS REVIEW flfVJfr WI CO ( COMPLIANCE TRACT DOCUMENTS ((JJ Rf.S■ l)il JUIIITY IS ASSUMED FOR (;F DIMENSIONS OR DETAILS •0:01iiiiS NI)( 1;U11 J 5.0 REMARKS J. i ',:;f JOHNSON CONSULTING ENGINEER 6ELLE'vUE. WA 98004 I/2.6"/g' t v � I' I' I' I' 1 Is THIS INCH 0£ 6Z Be I 8-o TO (nQ RESPONSE RLQtJIe'LD OF CONTRACTOR No eltcaptlohs tak ' ❑ Rejected ❑ Confirm Jk° Note markings Comments D Resubmit' [ a Attached Arc tact s NW ow Is or general c onformance with the design concept and ^ n• ract documents, Markings or comments sh. it not by construed s . . Contractor from compliance with the project piers ■md sin clficatlons r.. Of r . ua theref The Contractor rem responsible for details arid arc , In conllrmin re g end m cgrrelating all quentit.. s c^. � n9, for selectieF Si . � i,_ processes, for technIQUes of assembly, and for performing his work in a s r anner. By I(II 1 LZ ARCHITECT'S REVIEW 2 tv 5 SHOP DR..W NG RE /IEW 3 4 9Z 5Z bZ CZ ZZ LZ 0? 6l ZOO P 5 Pcn 1 IL alIA TV S Off. L v.. � Pk P. Wia.. vE0 P Su e• T GM.6 r. 1 i 2(0V\II5/4 o1 N ��ti stubs r -ci PK..;M t.kJ t�.__.._.. w ,— O " -) ss'e E IAC FLEXIBLE RULER - 302 AWaenMANV- 8l LL 9L SL 4l et ZL It 0 ....1.... .... I.... .... 1........ 1...... I.. .,�,,,.L.,.�...J,..,�....I..,.I , tea.. -_ . _: • T.', 5 5 m,Fy fL • Ta p1oV' OL Tl:Ittpog•aR.y pettiolf4eT SL. 1 P e x T72-IA s M S IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT — J • yJ /j'.o.. c3 4T5. 14' -v N / �E 1 ICS E ri4 e•Ds BLDG. AL I, S TH E.• 2 U I L,.+'2 I is I �}� S 4 _- - i4'o" FM.SS 1!7' -o'' TO FhcM 14 oVe :` C.batu. •Wfcon' az ?4 &8(L\. T 5 4'- 0 C- UMA11. . Vs/ Ii'•0" CANTS. E�or -4 �Nt T -3 T -4 0 DATE HOMeVJOOti 3UrrE5 I / 7. 71251.11 SHOP DRAWINGS REVIEW REVIEW IS FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS NO RESPONSIBILITY IS ASSUMED FOR CORRECTNESS OF DIMENSIONS OR DETAILS N REJECTED SEE REMARKS J. CLARK JOHNSON CONSULTING ENGINEER BELLEVUE, WA 18004 /•BY' i Oc 6Z _ ti TO FA C.E 2 o I N) IIIIIrIIIIIIIiIII1 'H1.11 II 0 If THe INCH 1 8G GZ 9Z GZ 4 73 CZ ZZ 3 4 STUF,I3ED Cc » io/a t3 '- fC f M o v GkNt. 200P F LZ OZ 6L l , l ST7 c FRAM Z MIN& 'L /NI\ I /4f' 5 6 7 FLEXIBLE RULER - 302AWaaRMANv— ARCHITEC''S REVIEW No e xceptions taken ,r' Ficlected ❑ Note markings ❑ tomments 0 Architect's revle* le for general conformance with the design concept and con• tract documents. Markings or comments shall construed all nut be construed ed as a° specifications, nor det her relieving t he ° Contractor from compliance htra with rem pro act lam and lures confirming therefrom. correlating e Contractor all quatities and dimensions, for details and fabrication for pressing for techniqs of sesembly, and for performing his work In a safe processes, manner. By SHOP DRAWING REVIEW RESPONSE REQUIRED OF CONTRACTOR Confirm ❑ Resubmit 0 Data � /4 I LL 01. i IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT .\ JD *4 / t LsS 1_VouT I S ABM 1�5 o5 -+t✓R_ si rte. o; I1 I - 1 n' 11`n>=R- 3L.4 ?fiO42TS -JrI.A � - r2asS oN 1..E D ; E8 T -33 6L)C1 ./ 30IN o LDC�, 2 1-oM WOC7b 5l_1ITE DATE SHOP DRAWINGS REVIEW REVIEW IS FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACT DOCIJtIENTS NO RESPONSIIIILITY IS ASSUMED FOR CORRECTN[SS OF DIMENSIONS OR DETAILS I AKEN men N • REJECTED AMED SEE t REMARKS J. CLARK JOHNSON CONSULTING ENGINEER BELLEVIJE, WA 98004 2319 / BY /2.6 7 . I 4411111 111111r1;11111 --_ 114 0 6 11111111011 10111 p aesoomm l• II 1111 8%o" To • ' '-(II 111 I 1`I11 I 1 I 11111111 t t IIII I I I I I I 1 II I rl I 1 .1. 1 " 7 ". 1 -"'4' 1 414 1 1.11-1'1" .0 to TH5 INCH 1 ' 2 3 4 oc C-DAAN■. `14/ STUD 5 T-' EiZ BG LZ 9Z SZ +1Z CZ ZZ 1_oop F I J I H G N s e_. t OZ 6t .1. 5 6 7 8 FLEXIBLE RULER -302 AWaERIAANv— Lt 91 St Vt El Zl L 01. Pg-A suer) Muss PtSsic, Fa it 3, LAMM. WO. PM ApS•PAsVeP puvr4 sttem r " FALS E G.E. l -o" TVP. _ SHOP Dli ARCHITECT'S REVIEK' •, • • 1.■)/111,1 No exceptions taken 0 Rrl Note markings SIK Comm, As Art, NesohmillI Architect's review Is for general con'ormance with fru; --- ract documents. Markings or comm,o, sli : : .,s1,. . • ., Contractor from compliance with t • p it.ct pi. • Ipo•Cilio lo urea therefrom. The Contractor remalr,s confirming and correlating all quanta ,.• . processes, for techniques of assembly, d for p,slcuning hi manner. _ . IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS 4 " . "c' — ‘7 -- • CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT co m v\i/a E Sit 7 - 1 D" PAcc.•E- 9 ,IR.telZ w 1 STLA eV-0" CORNER.- S" v..1 I 1.-0" I DATE 5LDG HOME WOOD turr 3 es /7 /2.5/91 SHOP DRAWINGS REVIEW REVIEW IS FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE IIIl CONIFOCT DOCUMENTS NO 1 :ii • I',NSIBILITY IS ASSUMED FOR Cnr INF:6 1.',F DIMENSIONS OR DETAILS fl r r r:E;CCILO FalARKS 1. JOHNSON CO (lit..,1■!EER ELLLEVUE, WA 96004 i 1 -0" CANT. `1T),, 7' -O" TO Fk CC 1jC;ririWZflt� F 1::;... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I'I I I III I' I' I 0 15 7115 INCH 11111 I'_I, I' _i ; L J-iiit I, I . ,.I : I 1 I 2 3 4 5 p£ 6Z Be LZ 9Z 5Z bZ CZ ZZ L_ 14' -o" FAL. E G,E, LZ O? 6L GCE a4Tt � 0 A $2.00r• FEAMI pL/ H Va" sch LE 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ; 1 . 1; .. 1 6 7 8 No exceptions taken Note markings Beh t BL1 on- ERs RBI Cr t Architect's review Is for general , r ract documents. Markings w Contractor from compliance MI t • m urea therefrom. The Contractor re. el' s •rv,i. • confirming and correlating all quantit processes, for techniques of assembly, an[ w. , manner. �A L TRU3 T 5VAMM , ABoLIT ., Pi Tc.M 5 G0XAM vN / GMAT. `i"- 22. 13 -oH TERM, 4-1IQ . w / i -o" c x T -2 -I SHOP 'DRAW NG REVIEW ARCHITECT'S REV W RESPnt E n : tnl• C,.- .Ifrrr 6 :-1•( I R.1 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT LDG "G 'a a o -TE SHOP DRAWINGS REVIEW REVIEW IS FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH CON1RACT DOCUMENTS NO RE: ONSIHI(IT) IS ASSUMED FOR CORRECENFSS OF DIMENSIONS OR DETAILS REI , ",1LD SE; F;FMARKS J ll!;;T IOH;,Tlff CFA ; illClli;G (NCi :E G I LE,LIE, tdA 93U04 I-4 C.) Iv\ W o . 9 � 43 U I1 E 5 7 7/25/91 um \ �- 29_ - _ . 0 _ ' ..... 64 tr m J # 3°3!' ,oFE T- I7 Z i :L 1 ,- 1 . :L 0 Li -1 Sa tes ' a 'r /N - adcr is to . i i 1 -0" CANT. `1T),, 7' -O" TO Fk CC 1jC;ririWZflt� F 1::;... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I'I I I III I' I' I 0 15 7115 INCH 11111 I'_I, I' _i ; L J-iiit I, I . ,.I : I 1 I 2 3 4 5 p£ 6Z Be LZ 9Z 5Z bZ CZ ZZ L_ 14' -o" FAL. E G,E, LZ O? 6L GCE a4Tt � 0 A $2.00r• FEAMI pL/ H Va" sch LE 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ; 1 . 1; .. 1 6 7 8 No exceptions taken Note markings Beh t BL1 on- ERs RBI Cr t Architect's review Is for general , r ract documents. Markings w Contractor from compliance MI t • m urea therefrom. The Contractor re. el' s •rv,i. • confirming and correlating all quantit processes, for techniques of assembly, an[ w. , manner. �A L TRU3 T 5VAMM , ABoLIT ., Pi Tc.M 5 G0XAM vN / GMAT. `i"- 22. 13 -oH TERM, 4-1IQ . w / i -o" c x T -2 -I SHOP 'DRAW NG REVIEW ARCHITECT'S REV W RESPnt E n : tnl• C,.- .Ifrrr 6 :-1•( I R.1 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT LDG "G 'a a o -TE SHOP DRAWINGS REVIEW REVIEW IS FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH CON1RACT DOCUMENTS NO RE: ONSIHI(IT) IS ASSUMED FOR CORRECENFSS OF DIMENSIONS OR DETAILS REI , ",1LD SE; F;FMARKS J ll!;;T IOH;,Tlff CFA ; illClli;G (NCi :E G I LE,LIE, tdA 93U04 I-4 C.) Iv\ W o . 9 � 43 U I1 E 5 7 7/25/91 \ �- 29_ - _ . 0 _ ' ..... -i4 -I 1-2 a. - ....).kgcam = J # 3°3!' i 1 -0" CANT. `1T),, 7' -O" TO Fk CC 1jC;ririWZflt� F 1::;... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I'I I I III I' I' I 0 15 7115 INCH 11111 I'_I, I' _i ; L J-iiit I, I . ,.I : I 1 I 2 3 4 5 p£ 6Z Be LZ 9Z 5Z bZ CZ ZZ L_ 14' -o" FAL. E G,E, LZ O? 6L GCE a4Tt � 0 A $2.00r• FEAMI pL/ H Va" sch LE 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 ; 1 . 1; .. 1 6 7 8 No exceptions taken Note markings Beh t BL1 on- ERs RBI Cr t Architect's review Is for general , r ract documents. Markings w Contractor from compliance MI t • m urea therefrom. The Contractor re. el' s •rv,i. • confirming and correlating all quantit processes, for techniques of assembly, an[ w. , manner. �A L TRU3 T 5VAMM , ABoLIT ., Pi Tc.M 5 G0XAM vN / GMAT. `i"- 22. 13 -oH TERM, 4-1IQ . w / i -o" c x T -2 -I SHOP 'DRAW NG REVIEW ARCHITECT'S REV W RESPnt E n : tnl• C,.- .Ifrrr 6 :-1•( I R.1 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT LDG "G 'a a o -TE SHOP DRAWINGS REVIEW REVIEW IS FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH CON1RACT DOCUMENTS NO RE: ONSIHI(IT) IS ASSUMED FOR CORRECENFSS OF DIMENSIONS OR DETAILS REI , ",1LD SE; F;FMARKS J ll!;;T IOH;,Tlff CFA ; illClli;G (NCi :E G I LE,LIE, tdA 93U04 I-4 C.) Iv\ W o . 9 � 43 U I1 E 5 7 7/25/91 I 0 6Z 13e LZ 9Z GZ 4 7Z CZ ZZ LZ OZ 6L 6" GI RADE _ ET \N/iLo"Srtir3 Sy MM. 3SE or+ Tg- LA 5 L 4- 4 - 2 W p, Th 14 s ■ 0 5 ,/ i4 -3 w/sk4 7 14- .2 w/5r V- FAIALA.s2.6 4 b 1 -- 'OA" -,... €5 C9164 ER- /W I 0 MTH{ INCH , Ttl l'I'l‘11111111111111111111111111iIII ii FLEXIBLE RULER -302 AWoanmeNv— LAI 14 -1 d- '0) LA 28 T- ROOF TR.U5s PLAN. i/e)" LIE TIT I 1 / 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 OL 1 W 4 • Vs) / CAM T \' N 43 LLII WiS.h411 T 41-1 pJ CrJ U$2.13 144A (_3) L 2a f e;-0 cpte..0 I 1R-DER. E3" , V4/ I-" See o■c; eXt% 5147 • f\)1 r -‘) ARCHITECT'S REV EW No exceptions taken Note markings 0 SHOP DR .1 eiG RI Architect's review Is for g■.n. ...ortnanc roct documents. Markings el comments Contractor from compliance with Vie project pi urea therefrom. The Contractor remains responsit confirming and correlating all quantities and ci. processes;for techniques of assembly, and for perfeeelng his wol manner. ' 1 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS ' CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT :• Date • I I . la f3LD6 "E5" DATE SHOP DRAWINGS REVIEW REVIEW IS FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH CHIRAC( DOCUMEMS NO RESFONSIBILItY IS ASSGED FOR CORRECTNESS OF OR DETAILS REJECIED (iEf. fiEMARKS I. CLiiiin CONSULTING Elatl:iEER BELLEVUE, WA 9SU34 dP___ By Atli', HOA 5, SLIITM'S /7 - 7 zsicii .td /c.4 F c. I 0 6Z 13e LZ 9Z GZ 4 7Z CZ ZZ LZ OZ 6L 6" GI RADE _ ET \N/iLo"Srtir3 Sy MM. 3SE or+ Tg- LA 5 L 4- 4 - 2 W p, Th 14 s ■ 0 5 ,/ i4 -3 w/sk4 7 14- .2 w/5r V- FAIALA.s2.6 4 b 1 -- 'OA" -,... €5 C9164 ER- /W I 0 MTH{ INCH , Ttl l'I'l‘11111111111111111111111111iIII ii FLEXIBLE RULER -302 AWoanmeNv— LAI 14 -1 d- '0) LA 28 T- ROOF TR.U5s PLAN. i/e)" LIE TIT I 1 / 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 OL 1 W 4 • Vs) / CAM T \' N 43 LLII WiS.h411 T 41-1 pJ CrJ U$2.13 144A (_3) L 2a f e;-0 cpte..0 I 1R-DER. E3" , V4/ I-" See o■c; eXt% 5147 • f\)1 r -‘) ARCHITECT'S REV EW No exceptions taken Note markings 0 SHOP DR .1 eiG RI Architect's review Is for g■.n. ...ortnanc roct documents. Markings el comments Contractor from compliance with Vie project pi urea therefrom. The Contractor remains responsit confirming and correlating all quantities and ci. processes;for techniques of assembly, and for perfeeelng his wol manner. ' 1 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS ' CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT :• Date • I I . la f3LD6 "E5" DATE SHOP DRAWINGS REVIEW REVIEW IS FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH CHIRAC( DOCUMEMS NO RESFONSIBILItY IS ASSGED FOR CORRECTNESS OF OR DETAILS REJECIED (iEf. fiEMARKS I. CLiiiin CONSULTING Elatl:iEER BELLEVUE, WA 9SU34 dP___ By Atli', HOA 5, SLIITM'S /7 - 7 zsicii D-Z. •M T-4 L1 i4 v- 2.0'.-81:Mot.iD 44-k ve/c. Mc a H.1 • NA NI D 14.3 N/ 4$7. ••- 44 wiamt kr■ NI() H -5 •14(c4NT. IA • 40 Viickrar, 1;•N opaegf:Re 1214.s.s £ ^4 7-1-2 1. : 4 : Pd r ::57)2t1)5/13. tif 5 _15 ,1411 c_ gLiffee: fri 1.2/ z zi R ur A-LA: 7 ,: 5 5 5 s Li rg_ 1 7 5.ftin, :::: °F- 124) DLCZ5 - • L4111 A TYR-Ne- sve_DT 0,'-o" To Fa‘c.E. L. 19 t II 1 I I i 1 IIII I I I I I 11111 i I i I Mil 1 1 i i i if if 1 li II 11-11 I 11, -11.....01.4.,111 1 i f-i• 1.11.111 Li ' , II I . 1 ;II .i.i. i • i . - 1 .r.iiiiitiiiiii.illi.i. 1 I 1 0 101113 INCH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 . i . , FLEXIBLE RULER -302 AWCIERMANY■ FRAA/WID .- ehf 011-VeKS I 6Z EIG 12 9Z GZ CZ ZZ 1Z 0? 6 1 8 1. 9L GL 4 71. • Z1 14 01, , 5 1 ' I 9 - 311 7-32 1• -32- T- a- T-32- 7-32_ '-o" To IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS 1iSS A CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO :NI THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 13LDC i H /N.A\ts/OCA> SHOP DRAWINGS REVIEW REVIEW IS FOR GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS NO RESPONSIBILITY IS ASSUMED FOR CORRECTNESS OF DIMENSIONS OR DETAILS virets A ■ . . REJECTED tEE FEL1ARKS CLARK 19tiNtON CONSIMI:V.; BELLEYJE. DATE 910../a_f...1 SUI TES S 7/7 5 113/c11 r OE 6Z SG LZ 9Z SZ 4 7Z CZ ZZ 6;/.2 - FiLocizue4s I ; - - 21(4 " DGe F LA%‘..(o LIT i?31,9 ' .. ,t ,... .. ..s._._ - - ,-- - .°.'' - , - - 11 , .., - . I ,- I '1", .,., , . . 1 ' li I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I 0 IS THS INCH 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 lz 0 61 ' TI 36, 1 - K 6) Ell LI 91 GL VL EL FLEXIBLE RULER -302 AWGERMANY LL 4— 0 0 IL Cr I 1 D 61R-17e-.R. 3e) t th 1" C T- 4 0 Yior !no Wirt VI' IH.VILVi iji,`.1111ANCE No ni; AF,'Ih.110 FOR CORPCINI.:, 5. 6 OR DIJAILS ' NTI 13/11_ hY I . IF TWI§ MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 6L06 -- \J/O P I MS