Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CAP 2013-02-11 Item - Agreement - Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Plan
TO: City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM Mayor Haggerton Community Affairs and Parks Committee FROM: Rick Still, Parks and Recreation Director BY: Dave Johnson, Recreation Superintendent DATE: February 6, 2013 SUBJECT: Parks Recreation & Open Space Plan — Authorize Consultant Agreement Project Number 81330101 ISSUE The City's 6 -year Parks Recreation & Open Space (PROS) Plan is due for an update. BACKGROUND The 2008 - 2014 PROS Plan was adopted by Ordinance Number 2207 on June 23, 2008, and amended by Ordinance Number 2213 on November 17, 2008. A city has a PROS Plan for a number of reasons. It helps to establish the parks and recreation needs of a community and identifies ways to meet those needs. It establishes a 6 -year Capital Improvement Plan and provides policy and standards to guide the department for the future. It also serves as the Open Space Plan which is required for the City to be eligible for State and Federal grant funding. DISCUSSION Requests for Proposals (RFP) were sent out to over 30 Parks and Recreation Planning consultant firms from the Municipal Research and Services Center roster. We received five proposals in response to the RFP. A review committee comprised of representation from Parks and Recreation, Mayor's Office, Community Development, and Parks Commission rated the five proposals based on Creative Approach, Qualifications and Expertise, Effective Public Involvement, Experience with Implementation, Professional Presentation, and Ability to Meet Timeline. This review narrowed the field to three consultants, who were invited in for a panel interview. The interview panel was comprised of similar representation as the initial review committee, and MIG was rated with the highest' score and selected as the most qualified consultant. FINANCIAL IMPACT The consultant's scope of work will not exceed the CIP's $100,000 budget for this project (page 52). RECOMMENDATION The Community Affairs and Parks Committee is being asked to approve the Consultant Agreement, and consider this item at the February 25, 2013 Committee of the Whole meeting and forward to the Consent Agenda at the March 4, 2013 Regular Meeting. ATTACHMENTS Project Scope of Work Consultant Agreement Evaluation Sheet Cost Estimate 1 2 Tukwila Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan Scope of Work PHASE 1: WHERE ARE WE NOW? In Phase 1, the MIG Team will gain a deeper understanding of the Tukwila park, recreation and open space system, building on our Team's existing knowledge, as well as the updated park and facility inventory, and recent local and regional planning efforts. Phase 1 Tasks: 1.1 Project Initiation Meeting (TAG #1) A technical advisory group (TAG) made up of representation from relevant City departments is an important part of building support within the City for park, recreation and open space projects. At key points in the process the planning team will meet with this group to solicit feedback on technical work products and seek guidance on the PROS plan development, including aligning projects with existing City efforts. MIG will facilitate an initial 1.5 hour meeting of the Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to discuss the objectives of the plan, information needs, communication protocols and scheduling of key events in the PROS process. Following the meeting MIG will prepare a 1 to 2 page summary of key decision points and provide this document to the City in pdf format for distribution to the TAG. 1.2 Background Information Review MIG will review key background information provided by the City. This documentation will include relevant site, city -wide and regional plans, City budget and capital improvement plan, recreation program guides, and other documents related to the PROS effort. Information from this background review will be incorporated into the summary documents, beginning with the Existing Recreation Resources Summary Report, as necessary, and tracked in a project references list. 1.3 Inventory Review and Analysis MIG will review electronic and hard copy park, recreation facility, open space and trail inventory data provided by the City. Existing classifications of park sites, counts of facilities and acreage will be analyzed and included in a base map of Tukwila's PROS system based on the provided Geographic Information System (GIS) data provided. The base map will be provided in pdf format for review by the TAG . MIG will complete one revision of the map based on any updates to the data (provided by the City) or style and presentation comments by the TAG. 1.4 Recreation Program Matrix and Analysis Utilizing City program information, staff and consulting team knowledge of other recreation providers in the community, MIG will assemble a matrix of program types and audiences and populate it with information about the existing providers in Tukwila. Analysis of this matrix will identify gaps, overlaps and niche opportunities, which will be incorporated into the Existing Recreation Resources Summary Report. 1.5 Site Tours MIG will participate in one day of site touring to familiarize the project team with the specifics of Tukwila's parks, recreation facilities and open spaces. This tour should include City staff members with on- the - ground knowledge of the best of the system as well as with issues. Observations of park and facility condition from this tour will be incorporated into the Existing Recreation Resources Summary Report. 1.6 Public Information Update MIG will prepare a public information update for each phase of the project that describes the process, interesting facts and findings in a series of short paragraphs that can be easily utilized in a wide range of existing City communications (including social media, newsletters and website updates). The Phase 1 update will include a description of the process, key dates (such as the community workshops), the online survey link, and preliminary facts and figures about the park system from the background analysis. 1.7 Stakeholder Interviews /Focus Groups (4 -5) MIG Team member BERK will facilitate one day of stakeholder interviews or focus groups, up to five meetings of 1 -1.5 hours. The topics and invitees will be discussed at TAG meeting #1. The City will initiative outreach and assist in scheduling the attendees, the City will also provide meeting rooms and logistics support. BERK will provide a summary of the discussions that identifies issues and ideas raised by the participants. 1.8 Existing Recreation Resources Summary Report The key work product of this phase will be the Existing Recreation Resources Summary Report. This report will include an overview of the economic context, discussion of demographic trends, and baseline information on the parks, trails, and recreation programs provided by the City and others, including an overview on how these sites and services are marketed to the public. This summary report allows for review of this information by the TAG prior to moving forward with the needs analysis. MIG will provide the summary report in Word and pdf format to facilitate the collection of comments. The City will collect comments and return one set of consolidated comments for one revision by MIG. 1 3 1.9 Project Management and Administration This task will ensure a consistent basis for project management and follow -up. As part of this task, MIG will prepare a request for information identifying the desired background information for the project. MIG will coordinate with the City on project activities and progress in biweekly phone calls, resolve issues that may arise regarding schedule and deliverables, and recommend direction for completing project tasks. Project Management and Coordination for this phase is based on a 2 -month duration. Phase 1 Deliverables: • TAG #1 Summary • Community and Stakeholder Engagement Plan • Public Information Update • Stakeholder Interviews /Focus Groups Summary • Existing Recreation Resources Summary Report PHASE 2: WHERE DO WE WANT TO BE? Phase 2 will include a needs assessment and the initial development of strategic directions. The community questionnaire and targeted focus groups will occur during this phase. Based on the vision emerging from the public engagement process, the MIG Team will design and conduct a needs analysis for the area that will identify needs for parks, recreation facilities, trails and recreation programs, as well as project future needs. The summary of the Needs Analysis will be the basis of the work in Phase 3. Phase 2 Tasks: 2.1 Community Workshops MIG Team member BERK will design and facilitate three community workshops at times and locations convenient to the target populations. The workshops will be open to the entire community but will also target participation from Tukwila's immigrant communities. Targeted outreach will allow the MIG Team to efficiently provide translation services by identifying the key populations and language groups for each workshop. The MIG Team will provide interpretative /translation at two of the three meetings, one in Spanish and a second covering 3 -4 languages based on anticipated participation. BERK will provide a summary of the set of workshops, identifying the specific ideas and overlapping themes raised by participants. 2.2 Online Survey MIG Team will develop an open- access online survey to gather feedback from residents, as well as employers and employees. This online survey gives all interested parties a voice in the planning process, and will collect community input about community desires, initial priorities and important park and recreation activities. The MIG Team will design and program the online survey, and analyze the results, including a brief memo summarizing key findings. The City will post the link to the City website and distribute it as widely as possible using existing communications networks and newsletters. 2.3 Needs Analysis MIG will design a customized analysis addressing Tukwila's issues identified in the Phase 1 public input and the Online Survey. A preliminary review of the analysis will be discussed by the TAG at meeting #2. Following this meeting, MIG will revise the analysis model, run it and prepare a summary of the results to present at the Strategy Session (TAG Meeting #3). All documentation of the analysis will be provided in electronic formats that are accessible to TAG members for review (Word, pdf, Google Earth KMZ). 2.4 TAG Meeting #2 At the second TAG meeting, the MIG Team will preview the results of the Needs Analysis and get direction and feedback to prepare the final analysis. Following the meeting, MIG will prepare a summary of key information items and decision points and provide this document to the City in pdf format for distribution to the TAG. 2.5 City Council Update This meeting will serve as a check -in and update with the Community Affairs & Parks Committee or Committee of the Whole, to present the Needs Analysis results and get feedback from Council prior to the strategy session (Task 3.1). 2.6 Public Information Update The Phase 2 update will include findings from the community input process and a description of the needs analysis process. 2.7 Project Management and Coordination Project Management and Coordination for this phase is based on a 3- month duration. 2 4 Phase 2 Deliverables: • Community Workshop Summary • Survey Summary • Need Analysis Summary • TAG #2 Summary • City Council Key Directions Summary Memo • Public Information Update PHASE 3: HOW DO WE GET THERE? To begin Phase 3, the MIG Team will facilitate a Strategy Session, expanding on the Technical Advisory Group as needed to refine the vision and further define objectives, goals and strategies to sustain and enhance parks, recreation facilities, trails and programs. Following the Strategy Session, the MIG Team will prepare draft strategies, actions and recommendations. We will also prepare a preliminary capital development plan and summarize funding and implementation strategy options (including a review of the implications on the City's impact fees) in a memo format. The TAG will review these materials and the project prioritization criteria. The MIG Team will refine the prioritization criteria and use them to prioritize capital projects, summarizing this information in memo format for further TAG review. Phase 3 Tasks: 3.1 Strategy Session (TAG Meeting #3) MIG will facilitate a third TAG meeting, using the Needs Analysis Summary as a starting point. This meeting will focus on defining the preferred approaches to meeting Tukwila's PROS needs. This meeting may benefit from an expanded attendance to include additional staff and potential partners. 3.2 Draft Strategies, Actions and Recommendations MIG will develop the ideas originating in Task 3.1 into a framework of strategic directions, actions and recommendations that will address park sites, recreation facilities and programs, and open spaces to guide implementation of the plan. The draft of this framework will be provided electronically (Word and pdf) for review by the TAG and comments (one set consolidated by the City) will be integrated into the Working Draft Plan. 3.3 Capital Development Plan MIG will build a planning model of the cost for developing the sites and facilities recommended in the plan. The assumptions for costs will be derived from any recent Tukwila's projects and the MIG Team experience. The model will be a working document that can be updated with new cost assumptions during and following the planning process. For review the document will be provided in Excel and pdf formats and a snapshot of this model will be included in the Working Draft Plan. 3.4 Funding and Implementation Strategies Based on the scale of improvements recommended, MIG will develop strategies for funding and implementing projects and service enhancements in Tukwila. This will include a review of the key variables in the Park Impact Fee calculation and a description of how the application of impact fees benefits the system as a whole. A memo describing proposed strategies will be provided by MIG for review by the TAG and comments (one set consolidated by the City) will be integrated into the Working Draft Plan. 3.5 Prioritization Criteria and Project Priorities MIG will draft criteria for Tukwila to use in prioritizing projects, both during and following the planning process, and apply these criteria to the recommended projects to create a recommended 6 -year Capital Improvement Plan along with non - capital projects the City should pursue in the first six year planning period. A draft of the criteria and preliminary prioritize project list will be provided by MIG for review by the TAG and comments (one set consolidated by the City) will be integrated into the Working Draft Plan. 3.6 City Council Update This meeting will serve as a check -in and update with the Community Affairs & Parks Committee or Committee of the Whole, to get feedback on the plan directions (Tasks 3.2 — 3.5) prior to preparation of the Working Draft Plan. 3.7 Public Information Update The Phase 3 update will include findings from the needs analysis and a description of how these influence the recommended direction for the plan. 3 5 3.8 Project Management and Coordination Project Management and Coordination for this phase is based on a 2 month duration. Phase 3 Deliverables: • Strategy Session (TAG #3) Summary • Draft Plan Elements o Strategies, Actions and Recommendations o Capital Development Plan o Funding and Implementation Strategies o Preliminary Project Prioritization • City Council Key Directions Summary Memo • Public Information Update PHASE 4: WHERE /HOW DO WE START IMPROVEMENTS? In Phase 4, the MIG Team will prepare a graphically -rich, readable and functional Working Draft Plan. The Working Draft Plan will be presented to staff and their comments will be incorporated and used to create a Public Review Draft plan. This plan will be released for review by the public and local agency review bodies. The MIG Team will provide a toolkit of review support materials, including a PowerPoint presentation and talking points for use by City staff in presenting the plan. Incorporating feedback from the review process, the Final Plan will present practical, implementable directions to provide core parks and recreation services to Tukwila in a cost - effective, sustainable, and successful way. Phase 4 Tasks: 4.1 Working Draft Plan MIG will assemble a first draft of the full PROS plan from the content created in Phases 1 -3, described above. This draft will be provided to the TAG for review prior to release to the public. This review allows the TAG to identify critical flaws, revisions of language and feedback about the overall presentation of the plan. MIG will provide the plan in Word format to allow commenting and will incorporate one set of revisions (based on comments consolidated by the City) into the Public Review Draft Plan. 4.2 TAG Meeting #4 MIG will facilitate a meeting with the TAG to review the direction and content of the plan in detail and discuss suggested revisions. 4.3 City Council Update This meeting will provide a chance for the Community Affairs & Parks Committee or Committee of the Whole to provide feedback on the Draft Plan prior to the public release. 4.4 Public Review Draft Plan MIG will revise the Working Draft Plan based on staff and TAG comments (received at the meeting and in written form), a full PROS plan will be released to the public and provided to City Council for comment and consideration for adoption. This draft is intended to support the community discussion of the plan through the adoption process. Rather than creating multiple versions as comments are received, the City will track comments and corrections in a separate memo, allowing City Council to consider the comments together and City Staff to recommend changes to incorporate in the final plan and which to address in other ways. MIG will provide the plan in both Word and pdf formats to support this review process. 4.5 Adoption Support MIG will provide a PowerPoint presentation to accompany the Public Review Draft Plan that can be presented by City staff as needed during the review and adoption process. MIG will also be available to respond to questions and comments as the plan moves forward. 4.6 Public Information Update The Phase 4 update will include the review and adoption schedule for the plan to inform involved community members when they can provide comments on the draft plan and how those comments will be considered prior to adoption. 4.7 Final Plan Following adoption of the plan, MIG will complete one round of final edits based on feedback received during the adoption process 4 6 (as approved by City Council) and deliver the final version of Tukwila's PROS Plan to the City in pdf files suitable for printing and for publishing online. 4.8 GMA and RCO Submissions MIG will advise on SEPA review and complete the self- assessment checklist to include with the plan for GMA and RCO submissions. MIG will deliver a package of electronic files appropriate for submission to RCO for plan certification. 4.9 Project Coordination and Close -Out Project Management and Administration for this phase is based on a 3 -month duration and includes the packaging and delivery of project files and other close -out activities. Phase 4 Deliverables: • Working Draft Plan • TAG Meeting #4 • Public Review Draft Plan • Adoption Support Presentation • Public Information Update • Final Plan • GMA/SEPA Self Assessment Checklist and Submission Package • Digital Project Files 5 7 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 Contract Number: CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR PLANNING & DESIGN SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, Washington, hereinafter referred to as "the City ", and MIG, hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant ", in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified. 1. Project Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to perform Parks and Recreation Planning services in connection with the project titled Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan. 2. Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies. 3. Duration of Agreement; Time for Performance. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending December 31, 2013, unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. Work under this Agreement shall commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement no later than December 31, 2013 unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City. 4. Payment. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services rendered under this Agreement as follows: A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed $95,041.00 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress of the work for partial payment for that portion of the project completed to date. Such vouchers will be checked by the City and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be made to the Consultant in the amount approved. C. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract price earned will be made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the completion of the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City. D. Payment as provided in this section shall be full compensation for work performed, services rendered, and for all materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City and the state of Washington for a period of three (3) years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon request. 9 5. Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, drawings, specifications and other materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this Agreement shall be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is executed or not. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said documents, drawings, specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than the project specified in this Agreement. 6. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services rendered under this Agreement. 7. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the Consultant's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 8. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. A. Minimum Amounts and Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types and with the limits described below: 1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. Automobile Liability insurance shall cover all owned, non - owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. 2. Commercial General Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the MIG PROS Plan — 2013 CA revised : 1 -2013 10 Page 2 Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City. 3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. 4. Professional Liability with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. Professional Liability insurance shall be appropriate to the Consultant's profession. B. Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain that they shall be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any Insurance, self - insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be contributed or combined with it. C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII. D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant before commencement of the work. Certificates of coverage and endorsements as required by this section shall be delivered to the City within fifteen (15) days of execution of this Agreement. E. Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within two business days of their receipt of such notice. F. Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City may, after giving five business days notice to the Consultant to correct the breach, immediately terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due the Consultant from the City. 9. Independent Contractor. The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the Consultant shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to the Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant. MIG PROS Plan — 2013 CA revised : 1 -2013 Page '3 11 10. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 11. Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it under this Agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, religion, creed, color, national origin, age, veteran status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, political affiliation or the presence of any disability in the selection and retention of employees or procurement of materials or supplies. 12. Assignment. The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. 13. Non - Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 14. Termination. A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant. B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses. 15. Applicable Law; Venue; Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be subject to, and the Consultant shall at all times comply with, all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, and rules, including the provisions of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code and ordinances of the City of Tukwila. In the event any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be properly laid in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs of suit. Venue for any action arising from or related to this Agreement shall be exclusively in King County Superior Court. 16. Severability and Survival. If any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is declared void or unenforceable or limited in its application or effect, such event shall not affect any other provisions hereof and all other provisions shall remain fully enforceable. The provisions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context are reasonably intended to survive the completion, expiration or cancellation of this Agreement, shall survive termination of this Agreement. MIG PROS Plan — 2013 CA revised : 1 -2013 12 Page 4 17. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address: City Clerk City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Notices to Consultant shall be sent to the following address: MIG 815 SW 2nd Avenue, Suite 200 Portland, OR 97204 18. Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. No amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless it is in writing and signed by the parties. DATED this CITY OF TUKWILA Jim Haggerton, Mayor day of , 20 CONSULTANT By: Printed Name: Title: Attest /Authenticated: Approved as to Form: Christy O'Flaherty, City Clerk Office of the City Attorney MIG PROS Plan — 2013 CA revised : 1 -2013 Page 5 13 Tukwila Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan Scope of Work Exhibit A PHASE 1: WHERE ARE WE NOW? In Phase 1, the MIG Team will gain a deeper understanding of the Tukwila park, recreation and open space system, building on our Team's existing knowledge, as well as the updated park and facility inventory, and recent local and regional planning efforts. Phase 1 Tasks: 1.1 Project Initiation Meeting (TAG #1) A technical advisory group (TAG) made up of representation from relevant City departments is an important part of building support within the City for park, recreation and open space projects. At key points in the process the planning team will meet with this group to solicit feedback on technical work products and seek guidance on the PROS plan development, including aligning projects with existing City efforts. MIG will facilitate an initial 1.5 hour meeting of the Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to discuss the objectives of the plan, information needs, communication protocols and scheduling of key events in the PROS process. Following the meeting MIG will prepare a 1 to 2 page summary of key decision points and provide this document to the City in pdf format for distribution to the TAG. 1.2 Background Information Review MIG will review key background information provided by the City. This documentation will include relevant site, city -wide and regional plans, City budget and capital improvement plan, recreation program guides, and other documents related to the PROS effort. Information from this background review will be incorporated into the summary documents, beginning with the Existing Recreation Resources Summary Report, as necessary, and tracked in a project references list. 1.3 Inventory Review and Analysis MIG will review electronic and hard copy park, recreation facility, open space and trail inventory data provided by the City. Existing classifications of park sites, counts of facilities and acreage will be analyzed and included in a base map of Tukwila's PROS system based on the provided Geographic Information System (GIS) data provided. The base map will be provided in pdf format for review by the TAG . MIG will complete one revision of the map based on any updates to the data (provided by the City) or style and presentation comments by the TAG. 1.4 Recreation Program Matrix and Analysis Utilizing City program information, staff and consulting team knowledge of other recreation providers in the community, MIG will assemble a matrix of program types and audiences and populate it with information about the existing providers in Tukwila. Analysis of this matrix will identify gaps, overlaps and niche opportunities, which will be incorporated into the Existing Recreation Resources Summary Report. 1.5 Site Tours MIG will participate in one day of site touring to familiarize the project team with the specifics of Tukwila's parks, recreation facilities and open spaces. This tour should include City staff members with on- the - ground knowledge of the best of the system as well as with issues. Observations of park and facility condition from this tour will be incorporated into the Existing Recreation Resources Summary Report. 1.6 Public Information Update MIG will prepare a public information update for each phase of the project that describes the process, interesting facts and findings in a series of short paragraphs that can be easily utilized in a wide range of existing City communications (including social media, newsletters and website updates). The Phase 1 update will include a description of the process, key dates (such as the community workshops), the online survey link, and preliminary facts and figures about the park system from the background analysis. 1.7 Stakeholder Interviews /Focus Groups (4 -5) MIG Team member BERK will facilitate one day of stakeholder interviews or focus groups, up to five meetings of 1 -1.5 hours. The topics and invitees will be discussed at TAG meeting #1. The City will initiative outreach and assist in scheduling the attendees, the City will also provide meeting rooms and logistics support. BERK will provide a summary of the discussions that identifies issues and ideas raised by the participants. 1.8 Existing Recreation Resources Summary Report The key work product of this phase will be the Existing Recreation Resources Summary Report. This report will include an overview of the economic context, discussion of demographic trends, and baseline information on the parks, trails, and recreation programs provided by the City and others, including an overview on how these sites and services are marketed to the public. This summary report allows for review of this information by the TAG prior to moving forward with the needs analysis. MIG will provide the summary report in Word and pdf format to facilitate the collection of comments. The City will collect comments and return one set of consolidated comments for one revision by MIG. 1 15 1.9 Project Management and Administration This task will ensure a consistent basis for project management and follow -up. As part of this task, MIG will prepare a request for information identifying the desired background information for the project. MIG will coordinate with the City on project activities and progress in biweekly phone calls, resolve issues that may arise regarding schedule and deliverables, and recommend direction for completing project tasks. Project Management and Coordination for this phase is based on a 2 -month duration. Phase 1 Deliverables: • TAG #1 Summary • Community and Stakeholder Engagement Plan • Public Information Update • Stakeholder Interviews /Focus Groups Summary • Existing Recreation Resources Summary Report PHASE 2: WHERE DO WE WANT TO BE? Phase 2 will include a needs assessment and the initial development of strategic directions. The community questionnaire and targeted focus groups will occur during this phase. Based on the vision emerging from the public engagement process, the MIG Team will design and conduct a needs analysis for the area that will identify needs for parks, recreation facilities, trails and recreation programs, as well as project future needs. The summary of the Needs Analysis will be the basis of the work in Phase 3. Phase 2 Tasks: 2.1 Community Workshops MIG Team member BERK will design and facilitate three community workshops at times and locations convenient to the target populations. The workshops will be open to the entire community but will also target participation from Tukwila's immigrant communities. Targeted outreach will allow the MIG Team to efficiently provide translation services by identifying the key populations and language groups for each workshop. The MIG Team will provide interpretative /translation at two of the three meetings, one in Spanish and a second covering 3 -4 languages based on anticipated participation. BERK will provide a summary of the set of workshops, identifying the specific ideas and overlapping themes raised by participants. 2.2 Online Survey MIG Team will develop an open- access online survey to gather feedback from residents, as well as employers and employees. This online survey gives all interested parties a voice in the planning process, and will collect community input about community desires, initial priorities and important park and recreation activities. The MIG Team will design and program the online survey, and analyze the results, including a brief memo summarizing key findings. The City will post the link to the City website and distribute it as widely as possible using existing communications networks and newsletters. 2.3 Needs Analysis MIG will design a customized analysis addressing Tukwila's issues identified in the Phase 1 public input and the Online Survey. A preliminary review of the analysis will be discussed by the TAG at meeting #2. Following this meeting, MIG will revise the analysis model, run it and prepare a summary of the results to present at the Strategy Session (TAG Meeting #3). All documentation of the analysis will be provided in electronic formats that are accessible to TAG members for review (Word, pdf, Google Earth KMZ). 2.4 TAG Meeting #2 At the second TAG meeting, the MIG Team will preview the results of the Needs Analysis and get direction and feedback to prepare the final analysis. Following the meeting, MIG will prepare a summary of key information items and decision points and provide this document to the City in pdf format for distribution to the TAG. 2.5 City Council Update This meeting will serve as a check -in and update with the Community Affairs & Parks Committee or Committee of the Whole, to present the Needs Analysis results and get feedback from Council prior to the strategy session (Task 3.1). 2.6 Public Information Update The Phase 2 update will include findings from the community input process and a description of the needs analysis process. 2.7 Project Management and Coordination Project Management and Coordination for this phase is based on a 3- month duration. 2 16 Phase 2 Deliverables: • Community Workshop Summary • Survey Summary • Need Analysis Summary • TAG #2 Summary • City Council Key Directions Summary Memo • Public Information Update PHASE 3: HOW DO WE GET THERE? To begin Phase 3, the MIG Team will facilitate a Strategy Session, expanding on the Technical Advisory Group as needed to refine the vision and further define objectives, goals and strategies to sustain and enhance parks, recreation facilities, trails and programs. Following the Strategy Session, the MIG Team will prepare draft strategies, actions and recommendations. We will also prepare a preliminary capital development plan and summarize funding and implementation strategy options (including a review of the implications on the City's impact fees) in a memo format. The TAG will review these materials and the project prioritization criteria. The MIG Team will refine the prioritization criteria and use them to prioritize capital projects, summarizing this information in memo format for further TAG review. Phase 3 Tasks: 3.1 Strategy Session (TAG Meeting #3) MIG will facilitate a third TAG meeting, using the Needs Analysis Summary as a starting point. This meeting will focus on defining the preferred approaches to meeting Tukwila's PROS needs. This meeting may benefit from an expanded attendance to include additional staff and potential partners. 3.2 Draft Strategies, Actions and Recommendations MIG will develop the ideas originating in Task 3.1 into a framework of strategic directions, actions and recommendations that will address park sites, recreation facilities and programs, and open spaces to guide implementation of the plan. The draft of this framework will be provided electronically (Word and pdf) for review by the TAG and comments (one set consolidated by the City) will be integrated into the Working Draft Plan. 3.3 Capital Development Plan MIG will build a planning model of the cost for developing the sites and facilities recommended in the plan. The assumptions for costs will be derived from any recent Tukwila's projects and the MIG Team experience. The model will be a working document that can be updated with new cost assumptions during and following the planning process. For review the document will be provided in Excel and pdf formats and a snapshot of this model will be included in the Working Draft Plan. 3.4 Funding and Implementation Strategies Based on the scale of improvements recommended, MIG will develop strategies for funding and implementing projects and service enhancements in Tukwila. This will include a review of the key variables in the Park Impact Fee calculation and a description of how the application of impact fees benefits the system as a whole. A memo describing proposed strategies will be provided by MIG for review by the TAG and comments (one set consolidated by the City) will be integrated into the Working Draft Plan. 3.5 Prioritization Criteria and Project Priorities MIG will draft criteria for Tukwila to use in prioritizing projects, both during and following the planning process, and apply these criteria to the recommended projects to create a recommended 6 -year Capital Improvement Plan along with non - capital projects the City should pursue in the first six year planning period. A draft of the criteria and preliminary prioritize project list will be provided by MIG for review by the TAG and comments (one set consolidated by the City) will be integrated into the Working Draft Plan. 3.6 City Council Update This meeting will serve as a check -in and update with the Community Affairs & Parks Committee or Committee of the Whole, to get feedback on the plan directions (Tasks 3.2 — 3.5) prior to preparation of the Working Draft Plan. 3.7 Public Information Update The Phase 3 update will include findings from the needs analysis and a description of how these influence the recommended direction for the plan. 3 17 3.8 Project Management and Coordination Project Management and Coordination for this phase is based on a 2 month duration. Phase 3 Deliverables: • Strategy Session (TAG #3) Summary • Draft Plan Elements o Strategies, Actions and Recommendations o Capital Development Plan o Funding and Implementation Strategies o Preliminary Project Prioritization • City Council Key Directions Summary Memo • Public Information Update PHASE 4: WHERE /HOW DO WE START IMPROVEMENTS? In Phase 4, the MIG Team will prepare a graphically -rich, readable and functional Working Draft Plan. The Working Draft Plan will be presented to staff and their comments will be incorporated and used to create a Public Review Draft plan. This plan will be released for review by the public and local agency review bodies. The MIG Team will provide a toolkit of review support materials, including a PowerPoint presentation and talking points for use by City staff in presenting the plan. Incorporating feedback from the review process, the Final Plan will present practical, implementable directions to provide core parks and recreation services to Tukwila in a cost - effective, sustainable, and successful way. Phase 4 Tasks: 4.1 Working Draft Plan MIG will assemble a first draft of the full PROS plan from the content created in Phases 1 -3, described above. This draft will be provided to the TAG for review prior to release to the public. This review allows the TAG to identify critical flaws, revisions of language and feedback about the overall presentation of the plan. MIG will provide the plan in Word format to allow commenting and will incorporate one set of revisions (based on comments consolidated by the City) into the Public Review Draft Plan. 4.2 TAG Meeting #4 MIG will facilitate a meeting with the TAG to review the direction and content of the plan in detail and discuss suggested revisions. 4.3 City Council Update This meeting will provide a chance for the Community Affairs & Parks Committee or Committee of the Whole to provide feedback on the Draft Plan prior to the public release. 4.4 Public Review Draft Plan MIG will revise the Working Draft Plan based on staff and TAG comments (received at the meeting and in written form), a full PROS plan will be released to the public and provided to City Council for comment and consideration for adoption. This draft is intended to support the community discussion of the plan through the adoption process. Rather than creating multiple versions as comments are received, the City will track comments and corrections in a separate memo, allowing City Council to consider the comments together and City Staff to recommend changes to incorporate in the final plan and which to address in other ways. MIG will provide the plan in both Word and pdf formats to support this review process. 4.5 Adoption Support MIG will provide a PowerPoint presentation to accompany the Public Review Draft Plan that can be presented by City staff as needed during the review and adoption process. MIG will also be available to respond to questions and comments as the plan moves forward. 4.6 Public Information Update The Phase 4 update will include the review and adoption schedule for the plan to inform involved community members when they can provide comments on the draft plan and how those comments will be considered prior to adoption. 4.7 Final Plan Following adoption of the plan, MIG will complete one round of final edits based on feedback received during the adoption process 4 18 (as approved by City Council) and deliver the final version of Tukwila's PROS Plan to the City in pdf files suitable for printing and for publishing online. 4.8 GMA and RCO Submissions MIG will advise on SEPA review and complete the self- assessment checklist to include with the plan for GMA and RCO submissions. MIG will deliver a package of electronic files appropriate for submission to RCO for plan certification. 4.9 Project Coordination and Close -Out Project Management and Administration for this phase is based on a 3 -month duration and includes the packaging and delivery of project files and other close -out activities. Phase 4 Deliverables: • Working Draft Plan • TAG Meeting #4 • Public Review Draft Plan • Adoption Support Presentation • Public Information Update • Final Plan • GMA/SEPA Self Assessment Checklist and Submission Package • Digital Project Files 5 19 L estimated project cost Caution Schmit Ryan Mottau Needle. 80 Buaak Jonathan Phoenix ? WOG Staff Pro; 5I 2 07135 9,01115 1 Rce90 P o Pore 65569319 1 Pho 1.1 :Project Initiation Meeting (TAG 01) 1.2 Background Information Review 1,3 ,Inventory Review and Analysis 14 !Recreation Program Matrix and Analysis 1.5 Site Tours 8 lb !Public Information Update 27 Stakeholder lnery en4Fucur Group (4.5) 1.8 iEdnin$Rmeadon Rumor.. Summary Raper 1.9 IPmleet Mamgenunt andMmmnr.tlon 51,320 SO 5810. 1 5540' 1 4 $540; 16 8 51,086 8 $1,080 2 5270, 2 $270' _,., ___. H _ $1.08 16 8 51,080: 512 51.92, 8 SO So 50 4 8380! f0 501 13.0401 so: 8 50i 57 S7601 2 515 8760: $760; $0 81.920; 32 4995 31.570 .220 00 28 16 5560 80 50 31,8401. SOj 32.400 50 I 80 3650 SO 3 001 3270 16 52.2401 6 90. so! Sol 2 50 58 76370 £.. a .l5601 5 $375 167 s 5075q 2 50 4 100: 52655 $1.570 $0 0 0 50 0 50 80 83320 x1,840 1100' - _ 82,500 50 60 0 50 8650 j 5300 28 12,960 5100 1 S3,330 S0 II FII $6,370 ,x01 n 50 550 - 1610 9300 1. 07 i2r e /190'', 923.745 2.1 !Community W ,8 hops 2.2 ;Online Survey 23 !Need analysis 2A ;TAG Meeting 02 23 ;City Council Update i 26 1 Public lnformalion Update 2 056580 12ana6prnenr Co rdini n, 3.1 :Strategy 5es.ion71AG Meeting 03 3.2 !Draft Strategies , Actions and Recommenda0ena 3.3 'Capital Development Plan 34 !Funding 86dlm016 antation Strategies 3.5 !Prioritization Criteda and Project Fbr 3.6 ,City Council Update 17 15,353 Information Update ...................... 20 nrc8cot Matiegernent and Coordination 533 533' 10 099, 16 16 9 5105 599 0165 6 51 6 165 2 82701 01,3501 02,1601 24 03,360 10 5810; 51,080; 82701 ............. 51 0811 ............ 24 $810! 511080 88101 8810 52700. 9 1 8 01,080: 2 -.. .. -- 5270 _,. _- 5331 8 81086 6 16210 0 00' 28 1 02,10 23,780 82,881 32 53.0401 51 78 39,070 80 i 50 80 0 50 ............. ...SD:..............._- �_.___g1 7 5975 001 S0 0 SO ... 10 5' 11 320701 ........ SO ............... 50 80 0 .. ............. ...e.... ............ 4 4314 6 2650 SO SO .....5 .. ............. .. ..... SO 1 ..... ee25 14 SI NOI/ 1 511 50 22,1.'5, ' 163 -... 01/11,4 '4 $3.360 10 $7001 16 85001 84,280 80 89.070 3/,950' 52,500 31,545 8100: 5100 01,075 52,170 S0 5650 $0 S>0 51,850 t60 $950; $24945: 0 0 110 , 51001 52,050 SO 0 00: $2,500 SO 87601 SO 8 07 0 $01 5380': 801 2 01. 34 $3,230 14 81 6 31.570 51.195 32,070 3650 01.560 y 4111610,,.... 0 50 1 50, E0 ; 50 0; 80 01 80 sof 001 ............ 30 0 SO 0 0 00 0 S0 0 80 67,545 61,570 81,195 1100 52,170 0 5501 8650 51410 02 00 5 0,537king D,ait Plan 2 STAG Mooting 04 4.3 I City Council Update 4.6 ;Publclnfomnauon Update 4.7 ;Foal Plan 4.8 ;BMA and RCO Submission, .: ............................... ............................... 4.9 IProjea Coordination and Close -Out Professional T1898 anti Costa', its0iC0ntin Tel Naiad Cost ■,0,,,011 21 5165 $0 833 3,46 79 553,035: 52,160, 16 51,080! 4 81,0803 2 5270! 8 ---5IA80T__.......... 8 ...................._51,080 8 51.080; ' $920 ..,.,._00 03.8001 8 501 ____._,.. 59.800 q 31,125 22.070 33.410 31.245 50 4 53801 En 6 7650 _ _._ 50 8 57601 4 , 5311 21 32.305 50 1011 2 htc3 50 00 52,4001 6, 9,360 ....01,080 ........... 31,560 9,000' 30 S0 ; 50 51001 SO 51001 59,800 81,225 82,170 so. EO So 0 SO 0650 50 i $0 ............_SO 0 so ' .............._. 02,305 SO1 $01 ..................................._ EO.... ...._�...................._50_ `..................51.080 $01 50' 80 0 SO l 050: 51.610 245' 0 $74,295 523,495;1 $1,800 585,475'., a 0180 95,047 Tukwila PROS Plan 1 2/5/2013 PROS Plan RFP Evaluation Sheet Points Beckwith Creativity, responsiveness, clarity, and soundness of approach 20 16 Qualifications, experience, and expertise of the project team 20 19 Proven experience in effective public involvement and incorporating diverse citizen input 20 15 Demonstrated knowledge and experience with actual implementation of possible strategies 15 10 Professional quality of submittal materials. 15 6 Ability to meet timeline 10 8 TOTAL 100 74 Conservation echn Interview Interview Interview RJM Design Group 17 16 13 11 8 7 72 estimated project cost Tukwila PROS Plan 1 2/5/2013 I6IMG. Inc. 1.1 Pram lm6.60o Weeny STAG331 Lauren Sdodet RSwe ,.:n 130124 302130 Pt05404 _._ 6 0'P£O 6 10.60.1 0 Meats, K Burn& 015504646.7 ._ ,.. 1 2eruth0n P1000.40 AmG Staff 5,4neaflun Manner Prolesi A55O049 _ -... ,... ._ ... SO 1 20rG 741.,1: 04 57993 Sarier,asswim• .. 4 5560 3%4 Asta6660e 50 fix rn e6:an 50 BERN. 7a 4 ,r0. 5360 ❑rrerr [err 5100 r. c,.,,. :one 10.635 13 B+d<g.o,nd lnimnamn Ra.�v. So 4 ! 1 5 5760. 1 IS 31,025 !0 SO 90 0 SO 31678 7.3 Im41w.y pewees /0054/1951 50 4 5540 16 51 0 5766 . 28 53.720 30 30 50 0 50 _ $3.220 14 614ne00.4 008350+ 54451,04nd .60011900 So 0 -.. 11,80 6 $760 . P6 21.040 00 50 - 30 0 30 51.840 15 534 70044 5 54,320 0 51,°x 50 10 16 12.460 SO 10 50 0 _. W 5100 02.5420 16 PoWrcN.0049, Wein. SO 2 5270 30 4 1350 SO 6 SOS0 16 S0 50 0 �_ SOO 1.7 540arkgAIet lottrototif mo t7mor 14451 S0 2 5220 '70 10 50 2 5270 86 12,140 6 1420 6 5300 25 52960 5100 53.436 1.6 Fi&r5 esmelm Bonus. Soaaerry llryun 2 1330 16 31,920 02 53.6760 34 53.370 10 SO S0 0 10 50.370 1.9 155104 51 .0.03. 2 133076 10 10 2 02 1,560 so so 50 0 16 550 51.610 12971 55750 54 14.400, 60 53717© 5375. 50 767 1 013.873 5790 20 24 52,e56 53.360 6 ' 10 148 1700 6 16 5360 5500 32 50 13,520 04860 3350 5700 533741 55.830 z 3.1 P5.r.e 2 Cnmmuniry WoR3ugpr 2 1330 1 5270 50 2 $196 23 Gtune Survey 2 5:030 10 10 25 12.1 40 5.1.780 50 10 SO 0 SO 1300 14.200 23 11243. P,neyas - - - - - 6 5996 16 32,140 24 12,510 32 5 , 75 5'9,2(70 f4 s0 30 0 50 51.026 24 7 AGM6513ng02 1 $163 6 1510 SO f0 7 3973 10 50 111 0 30 5500 53„075 25 Cloy Co.o&0e414 a 6 1990 5 59.000 111 W 30 14 52870 30 SO S0 0 10 5000 52.120 26 P.b& hvlv,mavon Opdal5 2 5270 4 1 :' 6 5630 S0 So 50 0 SO 163a' 27 PtgaRManyein.ne and C,wr dos 5 „n 3 3495 9 11200 50 00 3 1225 14 51.880 10 50 SO 0 35 530 0 M 31 S.Mw1 Pn;.se 3 504»®rSwo105s40 M10U1143 20 6 10909 0990 52 6 57.800 5510 14 52050 00 38 122600 31 12325. 165 54 S10.133 51.938 24 11138 So 10 5790 SO 14 5009 So 40 0 5{847 30 5950 3100 374,943 522136 32 • .e San•320t. AO 446 Rlwm.nw1d14ons 4 3660 8 15,000 So 20 52306 So 50 30 0 10 51.500 33 Capnd 0 196070001 Olrs 1 1163 6 5510 $0 13 31.545 so 50 So 0 50 50.540 34 Wnduugasd In,pfM.aogBO45traggn 50 0 5850 SO 14 31,020 50 00 00 0 50 51.570 35 Pa001003roa G. 0,1 and Pmjeef fNervtlu 1 1155 2 12711 So 01 51.£93 se 50 So 0 So 11.795 3b G15 2414■4.5. 6 1 ' , e 11250 SO 14 32,070 50 10 10 0 31 1100 19.170 3.7 PoNotihrmnan 50 .. 1275 30 8 5610 30 30 50 0 50 1650 3.5 P7gm Man.gamam 5461Ceatlnwon 1 31.80 12 51.560 SO SO SO 0 J6 550 31219'. 4 Ph4so4 11 naing Ora. Pia, 5 513•, 14 'uzr° 53.150 16 51.920 40 13 •, 6 184 00 515040 39.800 0 aa, 50 0 30 So a 5a 50 a 0 23 00 1250 319.x90. 08.509 1.2 AG 04 5 1165 6 15 IS 10 2 51:, 9 10.£23 50 SO So 0 so 1150 11225 4.3 C45 2oe55441451404 6 0 SEATO SO 50 32071 50 10 10 0 50 1100 12.170 14 0rc Ro+lw SBA Pkn 2 53 0 15.000 4 1.460 16 11 •, 30 52418 10 30 So 0 so 13.410 45 66760,., 5.00. 1 516 5 11.000 50 3 37,2(5 10 50 50 0 50 51245 a.6 1`nN415.)yma6en UpdOM 2 1 10 4 ., 0 5630 so So 30 0 SO 4600, 4F Frra1PW. 1 516 5 SI.,:., SO 0 4 21 S2-503 501 $0 50 0 50 02,003 40 GMA and 7109 ,+rnsam 10 1 SI B 10 50 0 11.080 00 50 00 0 50 01252 4.9 PwjeriCWr,3inOa. aM 8ea0002 2 1330 6 SO •I ,© i, £2 31.566 30 10 SO 0 30 330 515+10 Sde..1 21 33.465 77 16720 70 $1409 68' 36460 16 113117' 083 833.303 0 80 a 10 0 22 Ta 51..100 0 02 SO 50,320 5838 3130 51.000 5180 528493 505,475 Professional Tune and Casts Subtotal 79 513,035 220 $29.710 78 59.140 700 519.000 54 14,200 619 575,295 44 54.160 16 51,120 1104 hAminzmrn x,,41 :,'I...,.... - - „il,a ®.n3. Ovrn G...,. IoK r ew. 38348 905:61 Praj.•et Celt 595,041 Tukwila PROS Plan 1 2/5/2013