Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
CAP 2011-12-12 Item 2B.2 - Agreement - Duwamish Gardens Design with JA Brennan Associate
City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Community Affairs and Parks Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director DATE: December 9, 2011 SUBJECT Duwamish Gardens Project No. 90630102 Consultant Selection and Agreement ISSUE Consultant selection and agreement for design of the Duwamish Gardens Project. BACKGROUND In March 2011, the City issued a Request for Proposals for the design of the Duwamish Gardens project. The call for proposals included developing an archeological data recovery plan, contracts plans, specifications, cost estimate, and obtaining all required permits. The design will be based on a conceptual site plan developed by the WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) that included the excavation of approximately 55,000 cubic yards of material, providing 2 acres of shallow water mudflat and marsh habitat, a small trail, overlook, and interpretive signs. In April 2011, two consultant teams were interviewed in a competitive process after being short listed from nine RFP's that were received. The teams interviewed were JA Brennan Associates and Ridolfi. The consultants were scored by the selection panel, references were checked, and JA Brennan was unanimously selected as the firm that best meets the needs of the project. DISCUSSION Staff negotiated a consultant contract for the full design of Duwamish Gardens in the amount of $316,066.00. This was significantly over the original estimate of $250,000.00. Further cuts in the design scope were not deemed advisable by staff or the consultant, so staff then contacted the WA State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) and was able to secure an additional $50,045.00 in grant funding. Fiscal Impact: A total of $316,000.00 is currently budgeted with $300,273.34 available in grant funding and the remaining $15,702.66 will come from City funds currently- budgeted. RECOMMENDATION Approve design contract with JA Brennan Associates for design of the Duwamish Gardens project in the amount of $316,066.00 and consider this item at the January 9, 2012 Committee of the Whole and subsequent January 17, 2012 Regular meetings. Attachments: Consultant Selection scoring sheet Consultant Agreement WAPW Eng \PROJECTS\A- DR Projects \06 -DR02 (Duwamish Gardens) \Design \INFO MEMO Design Selection J.A. Brennan.docx 27 W a a s4. N 4>1 a /N 4i� p oo o N r- ,s, 0O N rn b�►V, N �t J d' r a b. X440 rn cU Ok yea %Ja M o CNI p /d► 00 444 c N aJ9 A r M M N co b N d f N d N N N R N U a C a O 3 N J ai co 30 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT .FOR DESIGN SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into. between the City of Tukwila, Washington, herein -after referred to as "the City and 1A. Brennan Associates, PLLC, hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified. Project Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to perform Design services in connection with,the project titled Duwainish Gardens Design. 2. Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies. Time for Performance. Work under this contract shall commence upon the giving of written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement within 365 calendar "days from the date written notice; is given to proceed, unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the .City. 4: Payment.' The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services rendered under this Agreement as follows: A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed $316,066.00 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress of the work for partial payment for that portion of the project completed to date. Such vouchers will be checked by the City and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be made to the Consultant in the amount approved. C. .Final payment of any balance. due the Consultant of the total contract price earned will be made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the completion of the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City. D. Payment is provided in this section shall. be full compensation for work performed, services rendered, and for all materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives 'of the City and state for a period of three (3) years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon request. 31 5. Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, drawings, specifications and other materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this Agreement shall be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is executed or not. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said documents, drawings, specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than the project specified in this Agreement. 6. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services to be rendered under this Agreement. 7. Indemnification. The Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, losses or liability, including attorney's fees, arising from injury or death to. persons or damage to property occasioned by any act, omission or failure of the Consultant, its officers, agents and employees, in performing the work required by this Agreement. With respect to the perform- ance of this Agreement and as to claims against the City, its officers, agents and employees, the Consultant expressly waives its immunity under Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington, the Industrial Insurance Act, for injuries to its employees, and agrees that =the obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless provided for in this paragraph extends to any claim brought by or on behalf of any employee of the Consultant. This waiver is mutually negotiated by the parties. This paragraph shall not apply to any damage resulting from the sole negligence of the City, its agents and employees. To the extent any of the damages referenced by this paragraph were caused by or resulted from the concurrent negligence of the City, its agents or employees, this obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless is valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the Consultant, its officers, agents and employees. 8. Insurance. The Consultant shall secure and maintain in force throughout the duration of this contract comprehensive general liability insurance, with a minimum coverage of $500,000 per occurrence and $1,000,000 aggregate for personal injury; and $500,000 per occurrence/ aggregate for property damage; and professional liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000. Said general liability policy shall name the City of Tukwila as an additional named insured and shall include a provision prohibiting cancellation of said .policy except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. Certificates of coverage as required by this section shall be delivered to the City within fifteen (15) days of execution of this Agreement. 9: Independent Contractor. The Consultant.and -the City agree that the Consultant is an inde- pendent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the Consultant shall 2 32 be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services provided under this Agreement. The City shall .not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state, industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to the Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant. 10. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained .any company or person, other than a, bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the frill amount of such fee, commission, percentage; brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 11. Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it under this Agreement, will not discriminate on. the grounds of race, color; national origin, religion, creed, age, sex or the presence of any physical or sensory handicap in the selection and retention of employees or procurement of materials or supplies. 12. Assignment. The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this Agreement without the express written consent, of the City. 13. Non- Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 14. Termination. A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10). days written notice to the Consultant. B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City if the City so chooses. 15. Attorneys Fees and Costs. In the event either party .shall bring suit against the other to enforce any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such suit shall be entitled to recover its costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred in such suit from the losing ply. 3 33 lb. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address: City Clerk City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Notices to Consultant shall be sent to the following address: Jim Brennan, Principal J.A. Brennan Associates, PLLC 100 S. King St., Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98104 17. Integrated Agreement. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both the City and the Consultant. DATED this day of 20 CITY OF TUKWILA CONSULTANT By-( Mayor Printed Name: Tames A. Brennan Title: Principal Attest/Authenticated: Approved as to Form: City Clerk Office of the City Attorney 4 34 December 6, 2011 a. br ennan Landscape Architects Planners 100 S. King Street, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98104 t. 206.583 -0620 f. 206.583.0623 Exhibit A Scope of Work Duwamish Gardens Prepared For: Ryan Larson, the City of Tukwila Public Works Department Project Description www.jabrennan.com The project involves design and permitting services for the construction of estuarine fish habitat on a 2.16 acre City owed site. A conceptual site plan has been developed by the WDFW and calls for the excavation of 55,000 cubic yards of material to establish approximately 2 acres of shallow water mudflat and marsh habitat and approximately 0.8 acres of uplands planted with native vegetation. Other work will include a small trail view deck kiosk Parking (on street or on site) Hand -carry boat launch Retaining walls (upland only) Minimal grading below OHW The work to be performed by the CONSULTANT consists assisting with Section 106 tasks related to archaeological site 45 -KI -703, Contract Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS &E), and submitting all required permits. Additional items may include the development of a contaminated soil remediation plan. Task 1— Administration Administration tasks include meeting coordination, scheduling, contract administration and subconsultant administration costs and expenses. Task 2 Site Inventory and Analysis This task includes site investigations from a variety of disciplines in order to ascertain site conditions, constraints and opportunities associated with the proposed design. Site inventory and analysis will include survey, hydrologic analysis, geotechnical evaluation, contaminant testing, cultural resource investigation, and other general site reconnaissance to collect important site information. The City of Tukwila will provide wetland delineation if needed. Task 2.1 Landscape Site Analysis J.A. Brennan Associates: J.A. Brennan will provide base mapping to team members, utilizing the survey and administer existing information for review by the appropriate team members. City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work 35 Deliverable: OHW delineation, base plan, vicinity map Task 2,2 Cultural and Historical Resource In vestigations A recorded archaeological site (45 -KI -703) is located immediately east of the project area; the site was excavated in 2005 prior to construction of Sound Transit's light rail line. The current project is subject to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act "Section 106 The Section 106 process requires a project proponent to identify any cultural resources that may be affected by a proposed project. Therefore cultural resources efforts will focus on determining if cultural deposits extend into the project area. If cultural deposits do extend into the project area, it is assumed those deposits would be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. In order to evaluate the cultural deposits it will be necessary to determine the nature and extent of the deposits, with a focus on any new information the newly identified deposits can provide compared with the 2005 excavations. PRA's focus is on documenting the extent of any deposits so that design plans can avoid impact to the greatest extent possible. Task 22 9 Regulatory Assistance Meetings PRA will attend up to 3 meetings with tribes and USACE to assist with consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The meetings are assumed to be held on site or at City of Tukwila offices. The first meeting should be scheduled as early in the planning process as possible in order to adequately address the concerns of the stakeholders regarding archaeological site 45 -KI -703. It is anticipated that the first meeting may inform the approach to conducting further cultural resources tasks. Attendees at the first meeting are expected to include City of Tukwila project manager, USACE archaeologists, tribal cultural resources staff, Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP), possibly King County archaeologists, JA Brennan project manager, and PRA staff. Prior to the first meeting, PRA will review any notes or correspondence made by the City during previous meetings with stakeholders regarding archaeological concerns. Correspondence PRA will prepare Section 106 correspondence for City of Tukwila signature. Correspondence is expected to include consultation initiation letter and definition of Area of Potential Effects. This task also includes reviewing correspondence sent by stakeholders. Task 222 Prepare Unanticipated Disco very Plan Because of the proximity of a recorded archaeological site, it is anticipated that stakeholders will request preparation of an unanticipated discovery plan (UDP). The UDP will outline the procedures to be followed if additional cultural deposits are identified as well as provide brief context for the site and any subsequent discovery. The UDP will not be as detailed as a Monitoring Plan. A draft UDP will be prepared for review by stakeholders. Upon receipt of comments, PRA will finalize the UDP. The City will be responsible for distributing the draft and final UDP. City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work 36 The UDP should be approved before any ground disturbing activities take place on the site. The UDP should be approved before any ground disturbing activities take place on the site. Task 223 Observe Contaminated Soil Testing Up to 14 geoprobes will be collected as part of the contaminated soils study. Because observations made during contaminated soil testing will help to identify the nature and extent of cultural resources, PRA will observe contaminated soil testing in coordination with geotechnical investigations. This will be conducted to leverage deep testing methods for cultural resources investigation. Cultural deposits (if present) are anticipated at approximately 8 -10' below surface; geoprobe sampling will extend to 12' below surface in order to exceed the expected depths of cultural deposits. This will allow a deeper look than traditional archaeological sampling could accomplish. Fourteen geoprobes will be taken from across the project area; sampling is anticipated to be conducted for 2 days. PRA will visually inspect the geoprobes and take notes and photographs. PRA will also take sediment samples for macrobotanical analysis. Identification of cultural resources during soil testing will not be not be grounds for stopping investigations (unless human remains are identified; human remains are not expected). Task 2.2.4 Macrobotanical Analysis In order to evaluate whether cultural material extends into the project area, PRA will analyze sediments for macrobotanical remains (presence of burned plants including charcoal; this is not taxonomic analysis). This analysis is proposed based on the known types of cultural deposits found at 45 -KI -703 (charcoal rich sand that is believed to be more diffuse to the west of the 2005 site boundaries). Although charcoal staining is a strong indicator of cultural materials, presence of macrobotanicals will provide a more refined investigation and efficiently maximize cultural resources data collection identify areas of cultural activity. Task 2.2.5 Monitoring Memo PRA will prepare a monitoring memo summarizing the results of the geoprobe monitoring and microbotanical analysis; the memo will include maps incorporating cultural resources data. PRA will submit the draft monitoring memo to City of Tukwila for distribution to stakeholders. PRA will incorporate comments and produce a final memo. Task 2.2 Deliverables: Meeting notes, draft correspondence, draft and final UDP, draft and final monitoring memo. City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work 37 Task 2.2 Assumptions: 1. No coordination will be necessary for the Carosino House or other standing structures (such as documentation or consultation prior to demolition) 2. Only one draft of each deliverable will be required 3. The City will involve USACE in cultural resources discussions in anticipation of their involvement; USACE involvement may initially be advisory. 4. Meetings are assumed to take up to 2 hours each plus travel time. 5. SEPA checklist will refer to the Section 106 work and will not require any additional reporting for Question 13. 6. No construction monitoring is included. No data recovery or testing is included. 7. Additional mitigation efforts may be requested by stakeholders, depending on the results of various investigations. 8. Archaeological investigations are expected to result in up to 1 cubic foot of samples which will need to be curated. Every effort will be made to reduce the curation burden. The cost for curation of samples is estimated at NTE $2000 (in perpetuity). This cost is not included in the budget. Task 2.3 Geotechnical Evaluation Shannon Wilson: The geotechnical site assessment scope of services includes data collection, testing and preliminary geotechnical design services for slope stability, foundation design of the viewing platform, and construction dewatering. Task 2 3.1 Subsurface Explorations S &W will drill and sample 60 -foot and 40 -foot deep borings for purposes of slope stability in the middle of the site. Soil samples will be taken at 2.5 -foot intervals in the upper 20 feet and then at 5 -foot intervals below 20 feet. The two borings will have pressure transducers /dataloggers for a period of two months to monitor groundwater levels and fluctuations. If the soils in the two new borings are consistent with boring AB- 18 completed by AMEC for the Sound Transit pier at the southeast corner of the site, S &W will assume that subsurface conditions are relatively uniform across the site and the combined data will be used to design the pile foundations for a proposed public viewing platform. If conditions are not consistent among the two new borings and the Sound Transit pier boring, we will recommend an additional boring at the location of the viewing platform. Task 2.3.2 Laboratory testing The laboratory testing program will consist of 12 grain size distributions and 18 water contents to characterize the soils. City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work 4 Task 2 3.3 Slope Stability Analysis Slope stability analyses will be performed at three locations for configurations of slope and river fluctuations, to include the northern cut slope, the temporary dike between the proposed basin and the river, and the cut slope in the proximity of the Sound Transit pier. S &W will identify maximum stable side slopes of native material at each of the three locations. This does not include interaction analysis between the proposed basin slope cut and the Sound Transit pier. Task 2.3.4 Viewing Deck Pile Design Analysis S &W will provide recommendations for foundation support for a proposed viewing platform and work with and provide design parameters for a structural engineer in the deck design. Task 23.5Pavement Design Analysis S &W will design will design a flexible pavement section for the parking area using the 1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. Task 2.3.7Hydrogeologic Assessment The groundwater hydrogeologic and environmental assessment objectives focus on two key considerations including 1) characterization of groundwater hydrogeology for evaluation of potential groundwater contamination and 2) construction dewatering requirements. Deliverables: Technical Memo Geotechnical Site Evaluation Assumptions: Shoreline exemption permits to be provided by the City prior to drilling. A proposed wall for a trail to the river's edge will not require design engineering. The additional boring referenced above is not included in the cost estimate. Anticipated traffic loads on parking area pavement will be provided by the City. Subgrade modulus values for pavement design will be correlated from existing geotechnical data; no new in situ or laboratory testing will be performed. Contaminated Soils Task 2.4 Contaminated Soils Groundwater Shannon Wilson: The environmental scope of services includes a review of a previous Phase 2 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared for the site in 2002 by Garry Struthers and Associates (GSA), sampling to assess the presence and extent of the soil and groundwater contamination in order to adequately characterize and design project specifications for disposal of soil excavated during construction, and to address the potential treatment and discharge options for groundwater generated during excavation dewatering. Based on review of the Phase 2 ESA prepared CDM in 2008 the following potential environmental issues will be assessed: potential near surface soil contamination (based in information from the GSA report) and City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work 5 w contaminated groundwater at the northwest corner of the site. Task 2.4. Previous Study Review The Phase 2 ESA prepared by CDM was reviewed for preparation of this scope. The GSA report is referenced in that report, but was not previously available. The findings of the GSA report, as reported, in brief, in the CDM report indicate that the surface soil at the site is contaminated with carcinogenic polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (cPAHs), lead, and chromium at levels that exceed the exceed the Washington State Department of Ecology Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Method A cleanup levels. According to the CDM report, this finding was based on extrapolation from composite samples collected from four quadrants of the site. These results are important because they indicate that the entirety of the surface soil at the site is contaminated at levels that would require special handling and disposal, and in the case of the lead and chromium, additional waste disposal characterization analysis. We will review the GSA report to better understand the significance of these findings. This may lead to a reduction in scope of the near surface soil assessment in Task 2.4.2, if GSA's interpretation of the data is found to be overly conservative or in error. Task 2.4.2 Near-Surface Soil Assessment A discussed above, the GSA Phase 2 ESA, as reported in the CDM report, indicates that near surface soils throughout the site are contaminated at levels that exceed the MTCA cleanup levels. Soil contamination of this level will require special disposal at a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle D facility during construction. However, the initial results were reportedly extrapolated from composite samples and are likely conservative. The following is an approximate summary of likely construction costs for clean and contaminated soils: Clean soil disposal, $15 /Ton, approximate $152,000 project disposal cost (not including transport) Contaminated soil disposal at Subtitle D Facility, $45 /ton, approximate $450,000 project disposal cost (not including transport) Performing the soils study could result in a project savings of $200,000 to $300,000, as well as provide more comprehensive site characterization which could be beneficial during project permitting and construction contract document development and the bidding process. Therefore, this scope of services recommends the following soils contamination work to complete the studies to confirm or discount the presence of these contaminants at levels that will require special disposal during construction. The site is approximately 2.16 acres in size, and samples will be collected for the top 2 feet using Ecology's guidance on sampling The approximately 7,000 cubic yards of soils in question would be sampled at a rate of 10 samples per the first 2,000 cubic yards of material, and then an additional sample for each additional 500 cubic yards thereafter for a total of 14 geoprobe samples, with soils samples also collected from 2 geotechnical borings, will be required to characterize the upper 2 feet of soil. The site will be divided into 20 approximately equal sized grids and the geoprobes will be advanced at the approximate center of each grid. City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work .B The samples will be collected using a direct -push geoprobe rig. The geoprobe is a direct push boring rig with a 2 inch outside diameter (O.D.) casing that is advanced using a percussive force rather than using an auger to remove soils in its path. Geoprobe soil samples are collected in 4 -ft long, plastic lined sections. While only the near- surface soil is assumed to be contaminated, the geoprobes will be advanced and 3 samples collected for each boring to 12 feet below ground surface to provide additional information for the cultural resources assessment. Soil samples collected from the geoprobes will be classified according to their geology and field screened for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and hydrocarbon contamination using a photoionization detector (PID). Prior to conducting the field work, we will prepare an internal Sampling and Analysis Plan that describes in detail the proposed sampling procedures. One composite laboratory contaminated soil sample each will be collected from the 0 -2 foot interval and the 2 -4 foot geoprobe tubes. Both samples will be submitted to the laboratory for analytical testing for cPAHs, lead, and chromium; however, only the 0 -2 foot interval sample will be analyzed initially. If the results of the 0 -2 foot sample indicate that the soil in that interval is contaminated above a MTCA Method A cleanup level, then the 2 -4 foot interval sample will be analyzed to assess the potential vertical extent of contamination. Additional samples may be collected if field screening of the geoprobe cores indicate that a contaminant other than PAHs and metals is present, and /or if indications of contamination are Each geoprobe location will be cleared by both private and public utility locators. We anticipate that the sampling will take 2 full days to complete. We will prepare a media characterization report that includes a summary of our field work, figures showing sample locations and soil disposal designation for each grid, tables summarizing the analytical data, and the raw analytical laboratory reports. Task 2.4.3 Contaminated Groundwater The groundwater hydrogeologic and environmental assessment objectives focus on two key considerations including characterization of groundwater hydrogeology for evaluation of potential groundwater contamination and construction dewatering requirements (see previous task 2.3.5 above). A previous Phase 2 ESA study indicated that solvent related volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected in groundwater samples. The groundwater assessment will further evaluate the presence of these contaminants in groundwater that could affect discharge permitting for dewatering fluids generated from that area of the site. Up to five groundwater samples will be collected in the geotechnical borings and wells and geoprobe sampling locations. The samples will be submitted to an analytical laboratory for analysis of halogenated VOCs. The results of this analysis will be included in the media characterization report along with our recommendations for potential treatment of contaminated dewatering fluids prior to discharge. Deliverables: Technical Memo Soils and Groundwater Contamination Report Assumptions: City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work 41 1. According the Phase 2 ESA, there are also two underground storage tanks present at the site, however; it is our understanding that these tanks will be removed by the City prior to construction. 2. Shoreline exemption permits to be provided by the City prior to geoprobe testing. 3. The consultant will coordinate utility locates. 4. No contamination occurs below a depth of 4ft. 5. Soil borings need to be collected to a depth of 12ft to provide adequate characterization for archaeological and cultural resources assessments. 6. The project archaeologist will retrieve soils samples from Shannon Wilson for their review, and /or attend the site during geoprobe sampling and boring activities. 7. Investigation- derived waste (i.e. geoprobe cuttings and decontamination water) will be stored in DOT approved drums on site. 8. Disposal of lab samples reviewed at a separate location by the Archaeologist will be the responsibility of the Archaeologist. Task 2.5Estuarine Ecology Identify Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) We will identify the OHWM and include this key feature on the project base maps. The following tasks will be accomplished: Coordinate with the Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE) to apply the appropriate protocol for the OHWM. Field flagging of OHWM. Coordinate with survey crew to map flagging. Conduct Estuarine Ecology Assessment and Pro vide Habitat Design Recommendations In support of the overall habitat design support, TEC will compile and review various relevant background documents in support of the design process. No field data collection will be conducted for this task. Deliverables: Estuarine ecology and habitat design support memo. Task 2.6 Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analysis: City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work 42 Task 2.6. Marsh hydrology, geomorphology and vegetation zones The marsh vegetation and geomorphologic characteristics are important in developing the project grading plans. This task will involve the following evaluation elements for supporting recommendation of marsh grading plan elevations. Identify and locate marsh vegetation and types, and mudflat elevations of adjacent and cross river marsh areas. Survey of points to be completed by Lin Associates. Data to be shown on CAD plans and provided to S &W. Review the HEC -RAS model, USGS and NOAA gages and provide documentation of tidal and USGS gage correlations to the project site. Provide a characterization of tidal and river inundation stages and associated geomorphologic and vegetation zones. Task 2.6.2 Project existing and proposed hydraulics A project hydraulic assessment is necessary to evaluate the project effects on floodplain water surface elevations, which are part of permit reporting requirements, erosion protection, bank stabilization, and slope stability design evaluation. The project existing hydraulics will include the following tasks: Document existing hydraulic conditions (water surface elevations, velocities, shear stress, ramping and drawdown conditions) as obtained from the HEC -RAS model for the following key periods: FEMA 1% exceedance flood (confirm with King County FEMA Flood Insurance Study and updates) Construction season conditions Provide a review of the hydrologic record for tidal and river inundation, flow duration and ramping characteristics to be incorporated into the geotechnical slope stability analysis. Provide recommendations on channel erosion protection and bank stabilization measures as necessary. Deliverable: Technical Memo Tidal Marsh hydrology, geomorphology and vegetation zones Technical Memo Tidal Marsh hydraulics Letter Stamped letter by engineer state that project will meet no -rise flood requirements. Assumptions: The most current King County HEC -RAS model will be made available to the project study team. City of Tukwila will accept from the hydraulic engineer a stamped letter stating that the project will have no -rise as it is a floodplain excavation and off -site disposal project. A detailed hydrologic and hydraulics report is not necessary for the design or permitting of this project, and that the items listed above will suffice. City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work 43 Task 2 7 Civil Engineering Surveying GHD: 1. GHD will identify both existing on -site utilities as well as utilities adjacent to the property and coordinate with Sound Transit, City of Tukwila, and other utility service providers. 2. GHD will confirm existing utility locations by reviewing asbuilt documents for the Sound Transit Light Rail Project. 3. GHD will provide input into low impact development strategies for the proposed parking stalls associated with the project and stormwater code requirements. Deliverables: GHD will provide a standard memorandum that may be used for additional documents Assumptions: GHD has design documents for the Sound Transit Light Rail Project. GHD will coordinate with the City of Tukwila in obtaining project as- builts for the Sound Transit Light Rail Project. Lin Associates: Topographic Survey. A complete survey of the site was performed by Sound Transit in 2005, in which Lin Associates performed the majority of the work and includes property and easement boundaries. This survey will be used for conceptual design. Pick -up surveys will be needed to update the basemap and /or expand the area shown to allow for final design. The survey datum will be MLLW. Geotechnical borings and test pits will be surveyed and added to the basemap. Deliverables: A copy of the survey on electronic media with property and easement lines. The drawing shall be compatible with AutoCAD and shall be one drawing file. An ASCII file of reduced survey points including the point number, northing, easting, and elevation based on the required horizontal and vertical control to be used. An electronic AutoCAD file with the triangulated irregular network (TIN) of the digital terrain model for the topographic survey and will include a copy of the Land Development Desktop directory with files which make up the surface. Task 3 —Alternatives Design Two alternative plans will be prepared for review by staff, stakeholders and the public. The alternative designs will be based on the WDFW Concept Design, 213, which has been selected as the preferred alternative from that process. Alternative designs will utilize new site analysis investigations and information to finesse the preferred alternative to meet habitat goals, add recreational and interpretive elements, and accommodate maintenance and security needs. The alternatives and memorandum that were completed as part of the WDFW Concept Study will be reviewed in order to understand previous investigations and incorporate project goals and relevant design ideas into the alternatives design. Taylor Associates/TEC, Inc. Provide input via one team meeting, and in a short memo re: habitat pros /cons for each alternative City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work 10 Shannon Wilson: Provide input via one team meeting, and in a short memo re: hydrologic hydraulic geotech/environmental pros /cons for each alternative GHD, Inc.: GHD will review two alternatives and provide input towards utility impacts, drainage requirements, site layout as it pertains to any hardscapes, grading, and construction sequencing. GHD will prepare a memorandum that maybe used in additional project documents. Lin Associates Provide input via one team meeting, and in a short memo re: structural effects to light rail for each alternative Deliverables: Alternatives memorandum (up to 2 pages) Two diagrammatic alternative concept plans (2406) Two sections /elevations Paragon PRA will prepare an alternatives memorandum (up to 1 pages) re: alternative impacts /opportunities followed by a meeting with stakeholders to discuss cultural resources concerns. Task 4 Schematic Design The draft and final schematic plan will reflect the preferred design as ascertained during the alternatives design process. The schematic design will include a preliminary layout of habitat, planting, recreational, access and interpretive features. The plan will be accompanied by other hand -drawn graphics as described under the deliverables section below, and a written memorandum that describes habitat and shoreline function and potential impacts or considerations related to code, cultural resources, and existing structures. Deliverables Base Map Draft Schematic Plan Sections, up to 3 Color rendered Final Schematic Plan Schematic Design Tech Memo (up to 4 pages) Cost estimate (for Final Schematic Plan) Taylor Associates /TEC, Inc. provide input via one team meeting, and in a short memo re: habitat pros /cons Shannon Wilson: Provide input via one team meeting, and in a short memo re: hydrologic/hydraulic geotech/environmental pros /cons, hydraulic engineering schematic plan and cost estimate GHD, Inc.: GHD will provide schematic site drainage, utility, and paving plans for selected alternative. GHD will provide a cost estimate for the schematic design. GHD will provide a basis of design memorandum that may be included in additional project documents. City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work 11 45 Lin Associates Provide input via one team meeting, and in a short memo regarding the structural effects to light rail for each alternative; schematic diagram showing the type protection/buffer zones that may be needed around the existing pier. Task 5— Public Involvement, Stakeholder Meetings and Team Meetings This task includes involvement and preparation for meetings with the client, stakeholders and the public. For detailed listing of the meetings, see Attachment B. Task 6 Design Development The design development submittal will apply technical expertise to create design solutions to schematic design problems. JAB will create a design development submittal that will be primarily Auto -cad- drafted; although some information may be hand drawn. Illustrative drawings will be completed as a method to convey design feasibility and finished project character. A preliminary square- footage level cost estimate will be provided for the design development plan. J.A. Brennan Associates Deliverables Specification Outline Product cut sheets Plans (as outlined in attached fee proposal) Estimate of probable construction costs Design .Development Tech Memo, updated from schematic phase (up to 6 pages) GHD GHD will provide Technical Drainage Report for the project. The document will be per City of Tukwila Standards and formatted per the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual. GHD will coordinate utilities that will be removed or abandoned. GHD will review and coordinate grading plan and provide earthwork calculations as needed. GHD will update the basis of design memorandum that may be included in additional project documents. Deliverables Technical Information Report (TIR) Schematic Drainage Plan Schematic Utility Plan Schematic Paving Plan Cost Estimate Temporary Sediment and Erosion Plan for inland work Shannon Wilson: The project hydraulic and geotechnical design will include the following tasks: Develop a construction sequencing plan, groundwater dewatering and temporary excavation recommendations. Lin Associates Structural engineering— Assist the civil team with preparation of the plan and profile of the deck. Provide tech memo to discuss possible options and costs for various alternates. City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work 12 M Task 7- Permit Support This task includes providing necessary permit documentation and a limited amount of coordination and correspondence to support the client applying for federal, state and one local (county) permits. The permit documentation includes the JARPA Application. J.A. Brennan will provide limited permit agency coordination support, and will provide a limited amount of design changes and responses to permit review comments. Revisions to the permit application or re -design as a result of the permit review is not included in this contract. Some meeting time and coordination is shared between several permit activities for efficiency. It is assumed that this efficiency can be maintained for meetings and coordination with multiple agencies. It is assumed that the JARPA will cover the Corps 404 permit, HPA, and 401 Water Quality Certification. A Biological Assessment (BA) will be needed to accompany the JARPA form and graphics. The client will provide the permit application and correspondence for the local grading and drainage permit. J.A. Brennan will not provide a separate permit submittal drawing and specification package. Taylor Associates /TEC, Inc. Taylor Associates /TEC, Inc. will prepare and coordinate the following permit submittals and approvals. It is assumed the city of Tukwila will complete state and local permits: JARPA USACE Letter of Permission, 404 (Dredging). The 404 is assumed to be the Nationwide permit (NWP 27) level of effort due to past similar permitting in the Duwamish. If an individual permit is required that would be additional scope/budget. 401 Water Quality Certification A Biological Assessment (BA) will be prepared in a manner consistent with both the WSDOT BA format used by the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (the Services) and the Army Corps of Engineers Duwamish Programmatic BA. Taylor Associates /TEC, Inc. assumes that two submittals of the report will be required, a Draft and a Final, with minor edits to be incorporated for the Final report. GHD GHD will prepare the required information and documents necessary for the contractor to submit the SWPPP for all inland work. GHD will coordinate with the design team for other work SWPPP related items. Deliverables (refer to attachment B) JARPA form and graphics (4) will be prepared. Biological Assessment Report Addendum Task 8 Construction Documents (50 90% and 100 Construction documents will be submitted twice for client review prior to issuing final construction documents. Submittals will be provided at 50 90% and 100% design completion. They will include plans, specifications and estimate of probable construction costs. Specifications will be provided in CSI format. City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work 13 M J.A. Brennan Associates: J.A. Brennan will provide layout, grading, planting, irrigation and associated details. Deliverables: JARPA Graphics (10 sheets) o Cover sheet and statistics Existing conditions /investigation plan Layout, grading and dredging plan Planting plan TESC plan Planting details and schedule Shoreline sections (up to 3 sheets) Other details Shannon Wilson: Hydraulic Design The project hydraulic design will include the following tasks: Finalize erosion and bank stabilization and habitat feature designs plans and specifications. Geotechnical design The geotechnical engineer will develop geotechnical design plans and specifications for the following project components: Permanent cut slopes Temporary construction and cut slopes Geotechnical design parameters for foundation pile designs to be developed by the structural engineer Contaminated soils removal and disposal specifications Construction dewatering performance specification (NO DESIGN) Construction dewatering for groundwater contamination performance Specification (NOT INCLUDED) Contaminated Media Specification Preparation Prepare specifications for contaminated soils handling. (to be updated) Assumptions: Construction dewatering performance specifications will be developed. No design of dewatering system will be provided to the Client who therefore assumes the risk for change order claims resulting from contractor dewatering system design and operation. The scope of services includes a construction dewatering performance specification (no design) only. The scope of services does not include plans and specifications for groundwater contamination treatment and mitigation. Deliverables: City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work 14 W Technical Memo Hydraulic Design Plans and Specifications Technical Memo Geotechnical Design Plans and Specifications Technical Memo Contaminated Media Specification Sections: Sampling and Analysis, Excavation and Handling of Contaminated Media, and Transportation and Disposal of Contaminated Soil. GHD GHD will update Technical Drainage Report for the project. The document will be per City of Tukwila Standards and formatted per the 2009 King County Surface Water Manual. GHD will coordinate utilities that will be removed or abandoned. GHD will review and coordinate grading plan and provide earthwork calculations as needed. Deliverables Technical Information Report (TIR) Drainage Plan Utility Plan Paving Plan Cost Estimate Temporary Sediment and Erosion Plan for inland work Specifications Lin Associates Survey Prepare Survey Control Sheet. Structural engineering for an approximately 20' 30' x 10' 20' pile supported view deck. Prepare structural details for the view deck supports per the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineer. Civil sheets to show plan and profile of the proposed deck. Assumptions General Assumptions: 1. No new wetland delineation will be provided. Wetland delineation to be provided by Client. It is assumed that no wetlands exist on site. 2. J.A. Brennan does not provide contaminated soils remediation services. 3. The client will provide coordinated, consolidated review comments at each submittal. 4. JAB will employ its own title block, sheet format and cad standards 5. It is assumed that there will be no changes to the entry road and path, or to any other elements in the road R.O.W., therefore no Right of Way permit will be necessary. 6. NPDES Permit application is not included. It is assumed that the Contractor will provide the NPDES. 7. Specifications will be 1994 CSI master format. City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work 15 8. Refer to Attachment B Fee Matrix for specific products and scope items 9. Construction support is not included in this scope of work. 10. Data review includes WDFW concept plan 11. Historic properties research is not included; it is assumed there are not designated historical sites or buildings within the project area. 12. Shoreline Permit application not included; Critical Area analysis and permit not included. 13. City grading permit, demolition, utilities and all other City permits not included. Optional Services Task 2.2.7 (if necessary) Site Form addendum If additional cultural deposits are identified, PRA will prepare a site form addendum including updated site boundary maps. The site form addendum will be appended to one of the deliverables (tbd). If further subsurface investigations are planned, preparation of the site form addendum may be deferred for efficiency, however PRA will prepare site maps for use by design team members in the interim. Task 22 8 (if necessary) Testing/Data Reco very Plan PRA will prepare a testing or data recovery plan that will outline the methodology and research questions that would be addressed during a testing or data recovery effort. This document would require review and approval from stakeholders. Additional meetings may be necessary to finalize the plan; one meeting is included in time estimates. City of Tukwila Duwamish Gardens Scope of Work 16 50 EXHIBIT B City of Tukwila Public Works J.A. BRENNAN ASSOCIATES, PLLC DUWAMISH GARDENS DESIGN ORK DESCRIPTION ITEM December 6, 2011 R 1 1 2 3 4 Administration / Coordination Job seLup Progress ports Prepare invoices Scheduling ota1 Site Inventory & Analysis Landscape Site Analysis Base map preparation identification of OHW Background data review, ports, plans, fence Up to (1) site visit Land use & zoning analysis Site context map (on USGS) Opportunities and constraints map Prepare site analysis technical memo (up to 8 peg 2 2.1 2.1,1 2.1.2 2.1.3 2.1.4 2.1.5 2.1.6 2.1.7 2.1.8 2.2 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.2.3 2,2.4 2.2.5 2.2.6 2.2.7 PI CN T To Designer Admin 00 flours Labor To Total 0. �Elnnn Expenses Total w/ Markup Total To Total Total Tote Total Total erkup Grand o TayloriTEC Shan. & Wil GHD Paragon n & Assoc Cass, Interp S b CO nsuitan __® 3 244.00 MM. 5 490.00 16 1,412.00 __© 10 1,074,00 490.00 41260 074.00 Total Land scape :She Analysis Cultural and Historical Resource Investigation Section 106 Regulatory Assistance Prepare Unanticipated Discovery Plan Option A: Observe Contaminated Soil Option A: Macrobotanical Analysis Option A Prepare monitoring results memo Of necessary) Site form addendum (if necessary) Testing /Data Recovery Plan 602.00 8 14 1446 00 118000 4 00 63 00 48460 820.00 602.00 232,00 446 00 200.00 224.00 509.00 602.00 556 00 305,00 341,00 63.00 569.00 =111111��_ =111 =EMI 00 00 r, - 600.00 1.100 050 170 0.00 600,00 100 00 1 050 00 600.00 05060 570'.00 0.00 60.00 0,00 05.00 00 060 60.00 602.00 2,656 00 2,355 00 1 511 00 63.00 69.00 75.00 2.3 2.3.1 2.3.2 2.3.3 2.3.4 2.3.5 2,3.6 2.3.7 Total Cutural and: His toricalResource Investigation Geotechnlcal investigations Subsurface explorations (2 borings) Laboratory Testing (18 grain size) Slope Stability Analysis Viewing Deck Pile Analysis Pavement Design Analysis Technical Report Hydrogeoiogic Characterization 2.4 A 2,4.1 2.4.2 2,4.3 To Gaoteahnical Invasti goffimmilainte MEE 34 00 0.00 32 00 98.00 134 00 1.294.00 464.00 232.00 443.60 0.00 232 00 98.00 134.00 371 60 294.80 460 90 262.1 0 2,376,00 2,948 00 2 289 00 641 00 6 616.00 4,096.00 2,116.00 2.376.00 409.60 4,969.60 559.60 2,948,00 2 289 00 641 00 6.616.00 294.80 228,90 164.10 661.60 556.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,408.00 2,224.00 5,562.00 684.00 1,042.00 6.501.00 1,362.00 iii 2,082:00 0.408.00 2.224.00 208.20 040.80 222.40 11,680,80 2,446.40 684 00 042 00 6,501.00 168.40 04.20 650.10 407.20 6,118,20 1 852 40 4620 7,151.10 Conta t d Soil T t g '' Sampling a dan analysis plan 0 000 Near Surface Soil Assessment (up to 14 geoprobes) mu� Contaminated Groundwater -_ 0 0 00 Total Contaminated Soils Testing ros 9,749.00 2,854.00 1;454,80 3,208.00 2.5 2.5.1 2.5.2 2.5.3 Estuarine Inventory & Analysis Compile and analyze field data Estuarine literature review Write estuarine ecoogy and sae data memo Total Estuarine Inventory & Analysis 2.6 Durso.. GaNens Tukwiz 2011 -07- 19,Opiion A 12162011 2,880.00 2,880 00 3.302,00 660.00 660.00 738,00 2,700.00 4,080 00 9,860.00 Fee Proposal City of Tukwila Public Works J.A. BRENNAN ASSOCIATES, PLLC Decemb r 6, 2011 DUWAMISH GARDENS DESIGN WOR DESCRIPTION ITEM Rate 2.6.2 Project existing hydraulics Total Hydraulic Modeling Analysis 2.7 Civr8Survey,ng 2 7 2 Survey Pickups to Update Site Survey Createlupdate basemaps Survey boreholes, testholes, monitoring wells Surveying :$17.6d4M0.-XDO :mod 4-AtAgn65 4.**144411 mom Minit tstiZASO *WM 2201E: Total 3 23200 232.00 566.30 134.00 134.00 392.20 366.00 0.00 - 366.00 , 958.50 0.00 5,925,00 0.00 3,34350 2,582.00 0.00 0 306.50 0.00 306. 0 8,507.68 0,09 0.00 Off0 0 00 439 65 30ff50 517.13 0.00 194.03 306.50 1,150.80 8,552,50 1, 18,190.60 0.09 0.00 500.00 0.00 0.06 50,626,00' 1,165.00 „.1,165,00 3,731.50 1,606.25 1,940.25 0.00 7,278.00 .41362.00 3,343.00 334.30 3,909.30 2,582.00 258.20 2,974.20 0.00 5,925.00 592,50 6,883.50 0.00 0.00 0,00 4,396.50 2,106.25 1,940.25 8,443,00 96,38 .00 439.65 4,836.15 210.63 2,623.38 194 03 2,134 28 844.30 9,593.80 9,638,10 114,339.60 Alternatives Design Review of project goals Alternative plans (2) Sections (up to 2, 1 for each alt) Prepare alternative design memo (up to 5 pages) Inundation duration analysis See drainage and utilities design Schematic Site grading coordination MIN 1111111111119 209200 46400 2500 20ff 0 2,117.00 2,117.00 464.00 464ff 0 MI= 5 NENE Liiiiralimmei832.00 83200 366.00 1,156.00 1,176.00 7 • III MI: 582.50 665 00 96.D*0I5I 500.00 14 1,109.00 25000 5 0 0 00 11,111 0 000 000 Total rnRM RigKEPII 0,':'7013WITAW:gt:0-Ft:14545,1'44409iWg:VMPIRAKtOgIMPS,INARgeninttngitVatUtnelt.Tit'OnVnteattn! 40 3,648.00 50.00 3,698.00 3,6g8.00 0.00 0.00 3,698ff 0 7 Milin. I 1111.1 mi 358.00 358ff0 59818%000 884 00 960.00 358.00 447.50 918.00 944.00 589.00 589.00 575.10 690.00 1,481.00 50ff00 895 00 260.00 260.00 2,171ff0 217.10 760,00 76.00 895.00 89.50 260ff 0 26.00 0.00 ff00 11 8789%000 25 00 823ff 0 823.00 0.00 0.00 823.00 8 9 Total 10 • 48 . p 24 7 5,241,09 6 "--',,,:9,971,00;' 1,934.00 484ff 0 ---s-; 00.00-. 125ff0 2,059.00 2,085ff0 484.00 573ff 0 10,971.00 .1 :ii8,595:10 :---:--,-,' 0600' -;--"'-"'.-,A,4131,00- ;',..;,-2,29(1.00,- -.1---,,,..7-0,06 895.00 260.00 260.00 mac 14 4 2 3 Milli -'111716-4 696.00 885ff0 l'''*''''''''ttAViTtlieNtlint*RMitlettiMINSON*1=PITANtlegiMPFITRARtattORtIlMitingftiglidgatempirnggim 696.00 1,214.83 675.00 1481ff0 817.50 1215.00 4 1,65396%000 20.00 1,558.00 1,650.50 675ff0 500,00 250.00 500.001111.= M=1 3,298.25 329.83 4,513.08 1,215.00 121.50 2,032.50 5 6 1,366.00 1,366ff0 1,392.00 20.00 MOO 1,38ff 00 1,392.00 1,386.00 1,386ff 0 1,392.00 ,rillml_MME1=11111111111M 2,156.00 215ff0 925ff0 92.50 2,575.50 00.0000 00.0000 0.00 0.00 1111Inglilliiii 1220.00 20.00 1,24ff 00 1ff 86ff 0 696.00 911.60 1,240.00 675.00 1481 00 11 8 2,240,00 2 20 a, iiiiii7,S40:20: 0.00 1,824.00 50.00 1,874.00 1,899ff0 OMMOMME 250ff0 250.00 25ff0 2 site visit to 1 sheet setep rgliiiiiiiiiiirg*MWWWWWWIMMEggaggieUMWWWWWWWWINOROBWWWWWWWWWPWMPOVENIMatif 1 ssom 50000 850.00 M000 3 483ff 0 483 ff0 510.23 272.25 272.25 27.23 782.48 0,00 0 00 3 Cover Sheet 2 2 126.00 12600 126.00 0.00 0.00 126.00 Site paving plan Meeting & memo with ST to discuss effects to pier Team Meeting (TEC, S&W, GHD, Lin) Draft and final preferred alternative schematic design Sections (up 10 2) Cost estimate Schematic stormwater and utilities plan Schematic hydrology/hydraulic plan Schematic tech memo (up to 4 pages) Illustrative sketches and plans Schematic paving plan Team meeting Client Kick off meeting (JAB) Stakeholder Workshop Team schematic meeting Stakeholder Meeting No. 1 - Public Meeting 51 Stakeholder Meeting No. 2 Up to 2 client meetings (JAB only) Prepare meeting & report graphics D.anesh GardensTuleek,2011-07-19,0plion A 12102011 526.00 1,164.00 287.00 598ff0 0.00 0;98300, 20ff 0 '-. 6 .00 526ff 0 1,164 00 61800 11., 13.00 Fee Proposal 1,176.00 832ff0 772.00 78.00 160.60 8,084, 0 1,481.00 ,481.80 125.00 1,540,00 ,000.00 1,540.00 640:00 780.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 665ff0 250.00 500.00 1,540ff0 780.00 1,606.00 ,341.00 0.00 0.00 Off0 66.50 25.00 50.00 154ff0 78 00 160.60 534. 0 26.00 89ff 0 .524- 784,43 464.00 2,117.00 1,176.00 832.00 366.00 1,257ff0 1,439 ff0 837 00 2,312 00 858 00 1,766 60 13,4 ,10 1,720.00 1,342.50 2,746.10 1,204.00 589.00 2,345.00 1,468.50 5,936,10. 3,067.60 1,240 00 1,386.00 1,386.00 1,39200 2,149.00 -.19, 41.68 City of J.A. BRENNAN Tukwila Public Works December 6, 2011 ASSOCIATES, PLLC DUWAMISH GARDENS DESIGN WORK ITEM DESCRIPTION JS ' P81 , TW 1 -- - r -Mind MP -.,r14.L.- &98.00 DC :. Vir1 982:50 ' KM. Desigfirir ';'..stada CN .,kdon: 573.00 ' Total , -„, #54o Total Labor Total Expenses Total -4III,100.14g)I,Mii*Nf*I-I-Wg, Labor/Exp Total w/ Markup Total Taylor/TEC Total Maglia Shan. & Wil. Total Total ,woiva-ckzil-mirk-a-vi GHD Paragon Total Lin & Assoc, Total 44-7.t.m.A.24---4,ww Case. !Mena. Total ...,„ ..„ Subconsultant Markup xg,..2,01F.0 Grand Total Rate 9134 .00 4 5 Existing Conditions s Plan (1 sht) Demolition, TESC & tree protection Plan (1 sht) 1 2 6 7 8 476.00 574.00 476,00 574.00 476.00 1,026.80 3,798.00 0.00 0.00 4,528.00 45280 476.00 5754 80 6 730.00 6 7 Site Layout Plan (1 sht) MBIIIIIIIIE IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEMIIIIIIIIIMIIII 2 11 3 2 1 11111 11111.1111111= Miliffillill7 IIIII .111131111111B E 4 8 8 8 111 E 2 27 8 12 8 4 0 14 15 2: 5621 00 00 2 2,5 72700 66850 1042.00 735.50 287.00 1,042.00 295.00 23200 0.00 1,08800 755.00 1,37900 1,312.00 Mil MIMI 2,360.00 2,360.00 2,599.00 75200 66850 1A4200 73550 313.00 1,04200 250 00 250.00 130.00 0.00 000 38.00 2 , 360.00 2.979.00 Grading Plan (7987) 2,561,00 727.00 668.50 1042.00 735.50 287.00 1,042.00 29500 232.00 380.00 250A0 25.00 1,002 00 9 10 Irrigation Plan (zone diagram only) (1 sht) Planting Plan (1 sht) 260A0 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 668 AO 1,04200 11 12 Plant 157(1857) S,te 0808058 (up 102, 7 2858818) Ose proferrod 811 5000075 000 0.00 260.00 26 00 000 0.00 735.50 573 00 1A42.00 14 15 Dro:ooge end 1.361000 PIen Ole 7850 Report- Teohnioel In18rrnonon Repolt 376 25 571A0 812.50 3,395.00 812 50 8125 3,39000 339.50 1,18875 3,966.50 16 Hydraulic/Hydrology Plan 0.00 1,09800 755 AO 1,37900 1,312.00 0.00 1.140A0 11111EMC01 1,379.00 1,312.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17 Prepore 1805 rneroo )op 183 p0586) 52000 62000 52 00 1,86000 18 Identify Products and Materials 0 AO 000 755.00 19 20 Cost estimate (team input) Prepare Illustrative graphics (1 plan, 1 other) for public 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 1,379.00 1.31200 21 Paving Plan 1 7 6 582.00 590.00 111046601.110PU40 1 590.00 590A0 895.00 895.00 89.50 0.00 0.00 1,56650 590.00 22 Revise tech memo 2 Totel 38 32 0 , 96 .:1 ,665.00 . 500.00 -- 1805500' ...'. 19,296.26. , "...1.i,",- 0,08- --, ,-3,796.00, i, 6,332.88 . - 000- - 1,182,25 -ii = 0,00 , - 11,312.75 - 1,131.28 30,609.03 7 1 Permit Support SEPA Checklist-draft,final r ,,:triii:t:it's..t::?;,16.1,:d.:;,-,-;,,,,,47.7p.A.:,;.7/w.,-IT7,7.--.:'--:;;:77:ErT,-rlt.,T2;3,ff7r:,5:Fp..;:i:z.4.175;:-:4::::,:17;af....r --,-.- --:".•7:f.,,47,,,A1"---- F;:.:Z7,:p-,sA.Y="7.j.f.,:nl,fp....,:ft?:::,:ilteet,'«-.,,', Mil 1 2 1 1 330.00 536.00 500.00 830.00 536.00 845.00 15000 606.00 700.00 ,....:1:5-5,:-,,frjAAF.7.A;F:::!:..,7::;::::,:::',.;;;:-:,',1';:p 150 00 15.00 700.00 7000 995.00 1.30600 3 4 Separate JARPA application for m water testing/letter of perm: Shoreline exemption for coring and drilling (City) 1 3 1 295.00 98.00 29500 98.00 523.00 2,280.00 98.00 2,280.00 228.00 0.00 0.00 2,803A0 98.00 6 Coordination with Tribe 2 1 2 3 4 36600 464.00 366.00 464.00 1,376.25 10,000.00 500A0 360.00 102.50 10,102.50 1,010.25 360.00 36 AO 11,478.75 860.00 2 7 JARPA Graphics -up 00 70, draft/final 8 18 11111=111 111111 90 6 6 II 7,336.00 7,336,00 7,344.00 80 00 80.00 8.00 7,424.00 8 HPA / JARPA submittal (WDEVV) 2 2 4 4 1 1 660.00 66000 232.00 928.00 464.00 98.00 967 00 660.00 660.00 1A35.00 3,750.00 730.00 700.00 3,75000 37500 700.00 70.00 4,785.00 1,430.00 10 DOE water quality certification NPDES permit 1 2 232.00 928.00 28200 500A0 1,048.00 1,200.00 500.00 50.00 1,20000 120.00 782.00 2,248.00 12 Post-application meeting & permit monitoring 464A0 98.00 967.00 626,00 98 00 967.00 1,620A0 1,620.00 16200 2,246 00 13 Light Rail Easement 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 98 A0 967,00 15 55170P 000rdirr0500 1 9800 98.00 24800 1,50000 1,500.00 15000 1,748.00 Totel 30 tii,*,R.::VySiaieRiiRr.VRWV:r3ifMtV2ZMr,F,2137RiMrgiiT.iV5ilir.ZRU:Wq'g:i..'.f-F-'2i,E[Z,T3R?3.NS-M,ri5iiiriinia.lg,EXWtigK.ni2Mi39.AtiiKf.QY.R.,VM,fga13i2q,R-n.ief.:r?„qgi44.2.,Aet,„M'irptNiti3 2 2 lo 2 10 148 2 16 i.,- 73.532,043 12600 1,25500 '. - 500.00 14,532,00 1,500.00 1,626.00 1,259.00 --, 6, 26 5- - 21,345.80 1,82600 1,259.00 , _ - 0.00 - - 1,850,00 . 0.00 f - f 102.50 - 0.00 - 22,942.50 = 2,29425 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 '39,268,75 1,62600 1,259.00 1 2 Cover Sheet (all sheets 22x34, 20 scale) Existing Conditions Plan (1651) 3 4 Demolition, TESC 6000 protection Plan (1 sht) Site Layout Plan (1 sht) 2 8 3 8 2 2 11 13 18 31 1,420.00 2,840.00 1,42000 2,840.00 1,420.00 2,840.00 0.00 000 0 00 0 00 1.42000 2,840 00 5 6 Grading Plan (1 sht) Irrigation Plan (1 sht) 8 2 2 2 11 11 E 29 24 24 16 32 14 2,738.00 1,94600 2,049.50 = 2,738.00 1,946.00 2,049.50 2,738.00 1,946.00 2,04950 IIIIIII 755200 73000 0.00 0.00 0 A0 0A0 000 CIAO 2,738.00 1,946.00 7 Planting Plan (1 sht) 2 9 4 13 9 14 8 2,04950 8 Plant lot (1551) 1,35750 2,815.50 1,164.00 le 1,357.50 2,815.50 1,164.00 1,357.50 2,815.50 1,432.20 0,00 0.00 1,357 50 9 10 Custom details: Sections (up to 3, 2 shk) Details: On-site TESC (1987) 0.00 000 2,682.00 268.20 2.815.50 4,11420 11 Details: Hardscape/Decking/ Site Elements (1 sht) 7 4 MEI 10 36 15 1,156.00 3,034.50 1,156.00 3,786.40 1,15600 7,519 AO 7,519.00 751A0 11,305.40 12 Details: Furniture (1 sht) 000 0,00 1,15600 Ouwarrlish 0214005 72kwila_2011.47.18.06ion 1002011 fee Pmposai Ctty of Tukwila Public Works J.A. BRENNAN ASSOCIATES, PLLC DUWAMISH GARDENS DESIGN December 6, 2011 WORK DESCRIPTION ITEM Rate 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 9 2 3 4 5 Details: irrigation (1 sht) Details: Plants/habitat (1 sht) Grading cut and fill calculations Drainage Report Cost Estimate Specifications (CSI) Up to 3 client review meetings Details: Paving Survey control plan Total' nt Site interpretive Plan B 00 4 Pi Total Total Total 57 Labor E Total Total Total Total Total To Total Labor/ Markup TaylorREC Shan. 8 Wl GHD Paragon Lin & Assoc Total Cesc. Interp Total Subconsultanl arkup Grand Total 2 4 625.00 1,266.00 892.00 625.00 266.00 625.00 1,266.00 1,026.80 848.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 1,348.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 134.80 50.00 2.482.00 2,482.00 665.00 665.00 66.50 5.954.30 20 8,143.00 3,66220 730.00 2,01425 814.30 366.20 73.00 201.43 2,726.33 625.00 1,266.00 2,374.80 782.00 3,213.50 14,097.30 6,360 20 1,581.00 2,215 68 7,142. 332.00 Interpretive Theme Development Draft interpretive panels - 2 signs 50% interpretive panels - 2 signs 00% interpretive panels - 2 sign 562 00 428.00 428 00 428.00 586.00 602.00 627.00 240.00 240 00 740.00 990.00 240.00 240.00 1,74200 1,990.00 1,810.00 6,920,00 !: 24.00 24.00 174.00 199.00 181.00 826.00 2,342.00 2,617.00 2,419.00 10 Bid Support 1 Answer contractor's questions during bidding 2 Pre -bid meeting 3 Up to 3 addenda 4 Review bid results Total Total .00:11.111ffignir 1,016.00 232.00 2,470.00: 50 408 07 79 42 1,207 25.00 1,564.60 3,065.00 696.00 1,016.00 232.00 2,485.00 1,053.50 232.00 2,593.95 00 4,529.50 132,863,03 41, 0.00 625.00 0, 00' 284.50; 992.50 23,402.00 f 20,082.7 80.0 0.00 989.90 0.00 232.00 .4 0,100.00 1l 18,333,5 316,060.28 Duwami4, Gs,Ce„s Tukw.,1011 -07- 19.001on A 12.2011 Fee Peopeml