Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFS 2008-12-02 Item 2B - Ordinances - Parks Impact Fee / Fire Impact FeeTo: Finance and Safety Committee (action) Community Affairs and Parks (information) CC: Mayor Haggerton Rhonda Berry FROM: Lisa Verner, Mayor's Office Nick Olivas, Fire Chief Rick Still, Deputy Parks Director DATE: December 2, 2008 (REVISED) INFORMATION MEMORANDUM RE: Proposed Fire and Parks Impact Fees This informational memorandum has been revised to address new information and questions that have arisen during Council discussions. The first section is new; the original document begins on page 3. REVISION NEW INFORMATION AND COUNCIL QUESTIONS 1. Problem Statement The City of Tukwila expects both commercial and residential growth through 2020. It has adopted a Parks level of service and will adopt a Fire level of service. In order to maintain the existing levels of service for growth and new development, the City must provide new park capital facilities and new fire capital facilities. The City's financial resources are not sufficient to fund the fire and parks capital facilities necessitated by new growth. It needs to find additional revenue sources to help pay for these capital facilities over the next 12 years. 2. Redevelopment The ordinances are drafted to say that any new, additional square footage for which a building permit is issued will be assessed a fire and a parks impact fee. A change of use does not trigger the application of impact fees. So, if a warehouse adds a second floor and turns into an office building, the applicant pays impact fees based on the second floor square footage (new addition) but not on the original square footage. This holds even if there are more people on the first floor under the office use. However, if the warehouse turns into an office use but does not add any more square footage, the applicant does not pay any fire or parks impact fees. F &S, CAP Info Memo dtd 12 -2 -08 Page 2 With respect to the City's existing traffic impact fees, the applicant is charged a traffic impact fee when the use changes, in addition to when new square footage is added. In the example above, the applicant would pay a traffic impact fee in both cases (with and without a new second floor, when the use changes). 3. Payment Examples Below are examples of fire and parks impact fee assessments for several development projects in Tukwila. The table shows what would have been paid at the time a building permit was issued if the City had adopted fire and parks impact fees. The calculations are based on total capital projects costs of $6,479,500 for Fire and $11,250,000 for Parks with a 90 -10% split between fees and city contributions. FIRE Project Land Use Category Wig development/ Retail Southcenter Square Parkway Place Office 16400 Southcenter Pkwy New Bank of America Office building (at mall) Tukwila Village Multi- family Retail 1 Office PARKS Project Wig development/ Southcenter Square Parkway Place 16400 Southcenter Pkwy New Bank of America building (at mall) Tukwila Village Land Use Category Retail Office Office Multi- family Retail Office Square Footage/Dwelling Units 230,444 66,000 7,451 144 I 42,000 1 12,000 Impact Fee per 1,000 gsf or per Dwelling Unit $580 $1,624 $1,624 $1,200 I $580 I $1,624 Square Impact Fee per Footage/Dwelling 1,000 gsf or per Units Dwelling Unit 230,444 66,000 7,451 144 I 42,000 1 12,000 $1,325 $662 $662 $2,211 1 $1,325 I $662 Impact Fee Assessment $133,658 $107,184 $12,100 $172,800 I $24,360 I $19,488 Impact Fee Assessment $305,338 $43,692 $4,932 $318,384 $55,650 $7,944 F &S, CAP Info Memo dtd 12 -2 -08 Page 3 4. Parks Capital Facilities List (Southgate Park) As a result of Council discussion at the COW on November 24, staff has taken Southgate Park of the list of Parks Capital Facilities to be funded by impact fees. This brings the total cost of the remaining projects to $11,250,000. A 90 -10% split means the impact fees fund $10,125,000 and the City must fund $1,125,000 from the General Fund. An 80 -20% split means the impact fees fund $9,000,000 and the City must fund $2,250,000 from the General Fund. These splits, and the resulting impact fees for the five land use categories are shown on Attachment t 5. Parks Use Ratios The Use Ratio used in the Impact Fees fonnula was derived from an analysis of the pass holder's use for the past year. Every time a person uses their pass to use the Tukwila Community Center the computer collects that infoimation. We were able to determine from this sampling that a resident uses their facility pass 2.44 times more than a business pass holder. Therefore, we are equating using a 1:2.44 ratio in allocating impact fees. We will attempt to collect data in more areas of the Parks Recreation Department Services for a larger sampling in the future. The City of Tukwila is unique with having 70% or more of its users of the Golf Course, Community Center and Pool being nonresidents. Our current and past residents have paid for the established or current Level -of- Service in the City. It makes sense that future residential and commercial growth pay for future needed Park, Recreation and Open Space facilities to maintain this quality of life in the City of Tukwila. The City needs to have another funding mechanism for parks other than the General Fund or we will not be able to maintain our current level of service. PREVIOUS INFORMATION ISSUE Adopt an ordinance for Fire impact fees and an ordinance for Parks impact fees, both for funding of capital facilities needed by Fire services and Parks services due to anticipated new growth and development. BACKGROUND The Administration is evaluating new sources of revenue for the City. One such source is "impact fees" through which new development helps to pay for capital facilities necessitated due to the new growth. Mayor Haggerton's goal is to analyze options and to adopt impact fees by the end of 2008. The Growth Management Act allows impact fees for parks services and for fire services, in addition to the traffic impact fees the City has already enacted. In order to consider and adopt impact fees, the City needs to have adopted a Fire Master Plan and identified a level of service goal for fire services. The 2008 Fire Master Plan, the Mayor's recommendations on implementation, and the Level of Service for the Fire Department are scheduled for adoption by Council on December 1, 2008. F &S, CAP Info Memo dtd 12 -2 -08 Page 4 The City also needs to have an adopted Parks master plan and identified level of service. The Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan was adopted in June, 2008. The Parks Level of Service is scheduled for adoption by the Council on November 17, 2008. Additionally, RCW 82.02.050 (4) says, in part: Impact fees may be collected and spent only for the public facilities defined in RCW 82.02.090 which are addressed by a capital facilities element of a comprehensive land use plan adopted pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.70A.070... An ordinance to amend the Capital Facilities Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan is before the COW on November 10 for public hearing and discussion. It is scheduled for adoption on December 1. Among other things, the amendment will incorporate by reference the 2008 Fire Master Plan and the 2008 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan, as amended. The Parks LOS ordinance includes list of Parks capital projects (some of which will be paid for through impact fees) amends the Parks Plan and is scheduled for discussion at the November 10 COW and for adoption on November 17. The Fire Master Plan, which includes Fire capital projects (some of which will be paid for through impact fees) is scheduled for adoption on December 1. Then the City will be consistent with RCW 82.02.050 (4). A public hearing on impact fees is advertised for November 24, 2008. DISCUSSION The State Legislature authorized impact fees when it adopted the Growth Management Act in 1990 as one mechanism to help communities address growth. According to RCW 82.02.050 (1), it is the intent of the State Legislature: (a) To ensure that adequate facilities are available to serve new growth and development; (b) To promote orderly growth and development by establishing standards by which counties, cities, and towns may require, by ordinance, that new growth and development pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities needed to serve new growth and development; and (c) To ensure that impact fees are imposed through established procedures and criteria so that specific developments do not pay arbitrary fees or duplicative fees for the same impact. Impact fees can be assessed for traffic, parks, fire and schools. The City already assesses a traffic impact fee. The Mayor is asking the Council to consider assessing a parks impact fee and a fire impact fee. None of the school districts which serve Tukwila have asked the City to collect a school impact fee on their behalf F &S, CAP Info Memo dtd 12 -2 -08 Page 5 Impact fees are used to provide funds for capital projects or capital facilities which are needed because of new growth. They are used to fund projects which maintain the same level of service for new growth as is provided for existing development. They may not be used for projects which are needed due to current deficiencies in public facilities serving existing development. In essence, impact fees are a mechanism for `growth to pay for growth." For consideration are two ordinances, one for impact fees for fire services and one impact fees for parks services. The text of the ordinances is similar. The ordinances address the fee formula, adjustments, credits, appeals, refunds and exemptions as well as use of the impact fees. Also, each ordinance includes a spreadsheet for calculating an impact fee and a list of projects for which the impact fee would be collected. Conceptually, the fee formula identifies the anticipated growth between 2009 and 2020 (12 years) in several land use categories and the cost of capital facilities needed to serve that growth and divides the two. The variables include the request for service (either calls for fire /aid service per land use category or amount of parks needed per resident) and the growth anticipated in each land use category. Because the City has a strong track record of both residents and employees using park facilities and fire services, an impact fee for commercial /industrial uses as well as an impact fee for residential uses is proposed. Attached are two pages of Options for impact fees (kind of a sensitivity analysis). One is for parks (Attachment A) and one is for fire (Attachment B). At the bottom of each sheet is information on the relevant impact fees assessed by other jurisdictions. Each Options page compares differing project totals, differing City contributions, and differing impact fees for several different land use categories. For example, the Parks Impact Fee Options page shows $12,250,000 as the total amount of projects. Next it shows what the impact fees would generate over 12 years if impact fees paid for 90% of the total and what the City's 10% contribution would be. Below that is shown the impact fee per single family house, per multi family dwelling unit, per 1,000 gsf of office use, per 1,000 gsf retail use and per 1,000 gsf of industrial use. The next block to the right shows the results of impact fees generating 80% of the funds and the City contributing 20 The block on the far right shows a 70 -30% split. Finally, the same 90 -10 80 -20 70 -30% splits are shown if $8,750,000 is the total amount of the projects. The same kind of comparison is offered on the Fire Impact Fee Options page. Council members may choose which impact fee /city contribution split results in acceptable levels of impact fees. RECOMMENDATION Adopt an ordinance which authorizes assessment of impact fees for capital facilities for Fire services needed due to new growth Adopt an ordinance which authorizes assessment of impact fees for capital facilities for Parks services needed due to new growth F &S, CAP Info Memo dtd 12 -2 -08 Page 6 NOTE: ATTACHMENTS HAVE BEEN REVISED BASED ON THE NEW INFORMATION; FOR OLD ATTACHMENTS, PLEASE REFER TO 11/24/08 PACKET Attachment A: Fire Impact Fee infoiivation Attachment B: Parks Impact Fee infamiation Fire Department Capital Facilities List 1 5,000 gsf building addition x $400 /psf building construction cost 2 %2 acre site (21,780 sf) x $25 /psf land cost 3 7,500 gsf building x $400 /psf building construction cost Capital Facility Cost 1. Construct/build relocated Station 51 5,000 gsf 2,000,000' addition due to new growth in TUC 2. Purchase aid car for Station 51 (new) 185,000 3. Purchase engine for Station 54 to replace aerial 750,000 ladder truck 4. Purchase land for relocated Station 52, if Station 51 544,500 is relocated 5. Construct/build relocated Station 52, if Station 51 is 3,000,000 relocated TOTAL 6,479,500 GFR lCAITB FIRE Impact Fee OPTIONS (revised 11- 24 -08) Total Project Amount over 12 years (through 2020) Key: SF MF Office Retail Industrial FIRE Single Family Multi Family All Commercial Office Retail Industrial Hotel /Motel /Resort Hospital /Nursing Home Medical /Dental Leisure Facilities Restaurant/Lounge Church /Non profit Education Special Public Facil AWC Averages (2008) Single Family Multi Family $6,479,500 Fees City 90% 10% $5,831,550 $647,950 $922 SF $1,200 MF $1,624 Office $580 Retail $127 Industrial Per Single Family Dwelling Per Multi Family Dwelling Per 1,000 gsf Office Uses Per 1,000 gsf Retail Uses Per 1,000 gsf Industrial Uses Issaquah (2006) Renton $622.25 $488.00 $853.42 $388.00 $200.00 $640.00 $200.00 $280.00 $9,610.00 $6,680.00 $2,090.00 $6,090.00 $390.00 $810.00 $3,120.00 Per Dwelling High $622.00 $853.00 $520.00 Low $104.00 $104.00 Kent* Fees 80% $5,183,600 $1,295,900 $819 SF $1,067 MF $1,443 Office $516 Retail $113 Industrial Bellevue* City 20% Fees 70% $4,535,650 $1,943,850 $717 SF $934 MF $1,263 Office $451 Retail $98 Industrial Redmond (1999) Auburn*** $94.48 $362.66 $132.73 $383.09 $110.80 $126.76 $13.07 City 30% does not have Fire impact fees $0.52 per gsf no com'I assm't since 1/1/08; Fire Authority Aaopted Level-of-Service Duwamish Riverbend Hill Trail Connections Tukwila Pond City of Tukwila Pool Leisure Pool Addition Boat Launches TOD Pedestrian Bridge Develop Phase II Green river Trail to Renton Black/Cedar River Development Phase IV Expand Features and Services Christianson Road, Codiga Park, Fort Dent Park, Log House Park Sounder Connection to Trail TUC CFP PROJECT TOTAL 3,000,000 1,000,000 3,000,000 1,500,000 750,000 2,000,000 11,250,000 TABLE 1: 2008 Park Impact Fee Calculations Land Use G'eotnot Per Single Family Dwelling Per Multi- Family Dwelling Per 1,000 of Retail Uses Per 1,000 of Office Uses Per 1,000 got Industrial Uses TOTALS 2007 I 2020 2007 'lousing 2007 2007 Building 2020 Housing 2020 Units Employment Area Units Employment 3.822 4.107 7,929 2 I 3 I 1 4.338 I I 6.491 6.245 I 1.561,250 20,384 I 10.192.000 20,343 I 16.274,400 46,972 1 28,027,650 I 10,829 Footnotes Correspond to chart above. I. Office of Financial Management 2. PSRC 2007 Covered Employment Estimates 3. Retail: 500asf ner ems: Office: 250asf ner ems: Industrial: 800gsf see ems: X ems growth. 4. 43 SF dwelling units ner year; rest is Multi Family: from 2007 Buildable Lands Resort 5. 90% of Buildable Lands Report estimates, at same as 2007 minim /mcnt 6, Tukwila Resident /Non Tukwila resident breakdown based on 2000 census data 7. History of the Tukwila Community Center users indicates that a resident uses their facility puss 2.44 times more stints that of a business nnss holder. Note: In 2000, the number of residents who live and work in Tukwila is 1,502, out of a population of 17,181, or approximately 9 PARKS IMPACT FEE FORMULA and CALCULATION 12 -2 -08 7.727 25,220 25.169 58,116 A -1 11 Net Growth, 2008 2020 2020 Building Housl Employ Building Arcs Employ Arcs ng me meant: Units Tukwila 1 931.750 12.610.000 20.135.200 34,676,950 II 4 1 5 1111 I 2,384 516 I I I 1. I 4,83 6 I 4,826 2,900 I 11,144 3 I 1, 370.500 2.418,000 3.860,800 6,649,300 133 435 434 1,003 Using the FORMULA above, and the 90% Park Impact Fee and 10% City Contribution breakdown of the Total Project Amount from Attachment A, the Impact Fees can be calculated as follows: Park Impact Fees for Established Level -of- Service m,,o Emma 1Hpn,•;t Total Park Project Conti ��,,,!,I l ug without Southgate Park City ContributionI 10% L@.04 Per Single Family Dwelling Per Multi- Family Dwelling Per 1,000 gsf Retail Uses Per 1,000 of Office Uses Per 1,000 gsf Industrial Uses 1 A x B x C Total Hours Housing Units A -2 x B x C= Total Hours 'Commercial' Units A -2 B I Employ Persons rnee l: per Non Housing 6 1 I 2.54 I 2.49 L349 I 4,401 I 4,392 I 10,141 I Impact Fees C n of Use Ratio Calculations Flours per Week Use Ratio From ah. I above Use Ratio 7 I!,tl'.ii'i4 rl,'6ili1!ltIiiii31•.t9SittaI I iiiilt 2114tliirkl1!I'tiiiIlU0 :484iiii!41 I+o!llhW. Walii001va1u14 ';:4i ;iti3IlI 1349;4061 Lcc 1,K'J.-40 Ctl'? 008. ..615tg39i.6'ihi;4:40'1'tc4rl11 I' ,rffdleiiF 4I10a7 9:D. I4.392 I 27,823 1 Per Unit Impact Fees 11.49 %i 91,163.753 I $2,255 fJ; •`T ��y ,i 52.06 %I $5,270,877 I $2.211 "1 4 9• f01 4.05%) $490,769 I $1,325 1y101 Nii��}B4 n J0971 I0>It 15.82 %1 51.601.456 I 5662 1V.15Y03 4551 15.78 %I $1,598,145 I 5414 ItI 'IN$1a3kir19i Sub Total Potential per Yearpg8i4'3 BOiiI Per liousins Cost Allocation Unit or I,00C SQ Ft of Use Rattai 11.49% 52.06% 4.85% 15.82% 15.78% 100% Petentiisi City Contribution per Year 7 10,775 48,804 4.544 14,028 14,798 $93,750 a b Potential per Year �,�Ytl!hl 1 Park Impact Fees for the Adopted Level -of- Service without Southgate Park. I Total Park Project Cos City Contribution Impact Fees Lan d USe o y },163,753 I Per Single Family Dwelling 11.49 /oq $5 270 877 4 Per Multi Family Dwelling 52.060 o $490,769 7 Per 1,000 g 4.85/0 gsf Retail Uses 15 82 $1,601,456 I Per 1,000 gsf Office Uses $1, 5 6 Per 1,000 gsf Industrial Uses 15.78% Sub Total Potential per Year ',504`. Potential per Year Total Park Project Cost City Contribution Impact Fees. $1,125,00 10% Per Unit Impact Fees Per Housing From Chen Cost Allocation Unit S orr 1 ,000'. above Hours Y1 20 1 I hi ti Il $2,250,0 $2,255 $2,211 $1,325 $662 $414 Per Unit Impact RCS $1;123 517 I $2,005 t Per Housing 'q a �;h' ib p I� F.., cben Cost Allocation vu,. or -'n� tli g .'I Q Ft 991�'J 1, ''FF 66 4 ebova /o 'Inalh t �IV Y �1'I �'q�'� Hours 21 551 Land Use. $1 034 14'7 ��I�S,�^mI�'g 1, 11 551 Per Single Family Dwelling tr 52.06 $`4,685224 $1,965 ��„4l�'; "da' 9,088 Per Multi-Family 000 gsf Dwelling 97 4 85 %M $436,239 $1,177 1 0 61 29,657 Per' 1,000 gsf Office Uses MATS Per 1,000 gsf Office Uses 15.82 %y $589 jl 29,595 r Per 1,000 gsf Industrial Uses 15.7 $1,420,57 I $368 Wing, tr I $187,500 Sub Total Potential per YePot a l p Y $937,500 Potential City Contribution per Year 10,775 48,804 4,544 14,828, 14,798 $93,750 r t ��o,in�+l h,vur' Potential City Contribution per Year AN ORDINANCE OF THE Cl'l'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING THE ASSESSMENT OF PARKS IMPACT FEES ON NEW RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Growth Management Act of the State of Washington and RCW 36.70A, the City of Tukwila has an adopted Comprehensive Plan, which includes provisions for parks facilities as part of its Capital Facilities Element; and WHEREAS, RCW 82.02.050 authorizes cities to impose impact fees on development activity as part of the financing for public facilities, including parks facilities; and WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council desires to provide funding for parks facilities, as referenced in the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan, through the imposition of residential and non residential development impact fees beginning January 1, 2009; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The City Council finds and determines that new growth and development in the City creates additional demand and need for public parks facilities in the City, and the City Council finds that new growth and development should pay its proportionate share of the costs for new parks facilities to serve new growth and development in the City. The City Council believes that this can be accomplished by the assessment of parks impact fees on new residential, commercial, and industrial development in the City. It is the Council's intent that the provisions of this ordinance be liberally construed in establishing the parks impact fee program. Section 2. Definitions. Terms or words not defined herein shall be defined pursuant to RCW 82.02.090 when given their usual and customary meaning. For the purposes of this ordinance, unless the context or subject matter clearly requires otherwise, the words or phrases defined in this section shall have the following meanings: 1. The "Act" means the Growth Management Act, Chapter 17, Laws of 1990, First Extraordinary Session, Chapter 36.70A RCW et seq., and Chapter 32, Laws of 1991, First Special Session, as now in existence or hereinafter amended. 2. "Building permit" means an official document or certification of the City of Tukwila issued by the City's building official which authorizes the construction, alteration, enlargement, conversion, reconstruction, remodeling, rehabilitation, erection, placement, demolition, moving, or repair of a building or structure. 3. "City" means the City of Tukwila, Washington, County of King. 4. "Development activity" means any construction of a building or structure that creates additional demand and need for parks facilities. 5. "Development approval" means any written authorization from the City, which authorizes the commencement of the "development activity." C: \Documents and Settings \All Users Desktop Kelly MSDATA Ordinances Parks Impact Fees.doc LV:ksn 11/25/2008 Page 1 of 5 6. "Encumber" means to reserve, set aside, or earmark the parks impact fees in order to pay for commitments, contractual obligations, or other liabilities incurred for the provision of parks services. 7. "Fee payer" is a person, corporation, partnership, an incorporated association or governmental agency, municipality, or similar entity commencing a land development activity that requires a building permit and creates a demand for additional parks capital facilities. 8. "Impact fee" means the payment of money imposed by the City on development activity pursuant to this ordinance as a condition of granting development approval in order to pay for the parks facilities needed to serve new growth and development that is a proportionate share of the cost of parks capital facilities that is used for facilities that reasonably benefit new development. Impact fees do not include a reasonable permit fee, an application fee, and the administrative fee for collecting and handling parks impact fees or cost of reviewing independent fee calculations. 9. "Owner" means the owner of record of real property, as found in the records of King County, Washington, or a person with an unrestricted written option to purchase property; provided, that if the real property is being purchased under a recorded real estate contract, the purchaser shall be considered the owner of the property. 10. "Proportionate share" means that portion of the cost for parks facility improvements that are reasonably related to the service demands and needs of new development. 11. "Public facilities" means the following capital facilities owned or operated by governmental entities: (1) public streets and roads; (2) publicly owned parks and open spaces and recreational facilities; (3) school facilities; (4) fire protection facilities not part of a fire district; and (5) police facilities and essential public facilities as defined by Chapter 36.70A RCW. Section 3. Parks Impact Fee Assessment. A. The City shall collect parks impact fees from applicants seeking development approvals from the City for any development activity in the City for which building permits are required, effective January 1, 2009. This will include the expansion of existing uses, which create the demand for parks services. B. Parks impact fees shall be assessed at the time of a technically complete building permit application that complies with the City's zoning ordinances and building and development codes. Parks impact fees shall be collected from the fee payer at the time the building permit is issued. C. Except if otherwise exempt, the City shall not issue the required building permit unless or until the parks impact fees are paid. Section 4. Use of Parks Impact Fees. A. Pursuant to this ordinance, parks impact fees shall be used for parks facilities that will reasonably benefit the City and its residents. B. Fees shall not be used to make up deficiencies in City facilities serving an existing development. C. Fees shall not be used for maintenance and operations, including personnel. D. Parks impact fees shall be used for but not limited to land acquisition, site improvements, engineering and architectural services, permitting, financing, administrative expenses and applicable mitigation costs, and capital equipment pertaining to parks facilities. C: \Documents and Settings All Users\ Desktop Kelly \MSDATA Ordinances \Parks Impact Fees.doc LV:ksn 11/25/2008 Page 2 of 5 E. Parks impact fees may also be used to recoup public improvement costs incurred by the City to the extent that new growth and development will be served by the previously constructed improvement. F. In the event bonds or similar debt instruments are or have been issued for parks facility improvements, impact fees may be used to pay the principal on such bonds. Section 5. Parks Impact Fee Capital Facilities Plan. In order to collect parks impact fees, the City must first adopt a parks capital facilities plan as an element of the City's Comprehensive Plan_ The City's Capital Facilities Plan for parks services shall consist of the following elements: 1. The City's capacity over the next six years, based on an inventory of the City's parks facilities both existing and under construction; 2. The forecast of future needs for parks facilities based upon the City's population projections; 3. A six-year financial plan component, updated as necessary, to maintain at least a six-year forecast for financing needed within projected funding levels; 4. Application of the formula set forth in this ordinance based upon the information in the Capital Facilities Plan; and 5. City Council Action. No new or revised impact fee shall be effective until adopted by the City Council following a duly advertised public hearing to consider the City's Capital Facilities Plan or plan update. Section 6. Parks Impact Fee Formula. The impact fee formula is based on the assumptions found in Tukwila Parks Impact Fees, 2008, Exhibit A, and Tukwila Parks Capital Facilities List, Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference fully incorporated herein. Land Use Single Family Multi- Family Office Retail Industrial PARKS IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Impact Fee I Per Residential Unit Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. GFA Section 7. Parks Impact Fee Adjustments. A. The City may adjust a parks impact fee at the time the fee is imposed to consider unusual circumstances in specific cases to ensure that impact fees are imposed fairly. B. In calculating the fee imposed on a particular development, the City shall permit consideration of studies and data submitted by a developer to adjust the amount of the fee. The developer shall submit an independent fee calculation study to the Director of Parks and Recreation, who shall review the study to determine that the study: 1. is based on accepted impact fee assessment practices and methodologies; 2. uses acceptable data sources and the data used is comparable with the uses and intensities planned for the proposed development activity; 3. complies with the applicable state laws governing impact fees; 4. is prepared and documented by professionals who are mutually agreeable to the City and the developer and are qualified in their respective fields; and 5. shows the basis upon which the independent fee calculation was made. C: \Documents and Settings \All Users Desktop Kelly MSDATA Ordinances Parks Impact Fees.doc LV:ksn 11/25/2008 Page 3 of 5 C. In reviewing the study, the Director of Parks and Recreation may require the developer to submit additional or different documentation. If an acceptable study is presented, the Director of Parks and Recreation may adjust the fee to that appropriate for the particular development activity. If an acceptable study is not presented, the developer shall pay the impact fees required prior to submitting the study. D. A developer requesting an adjustment or independent fee calculation may pay the impact fees imposed by this Ordinance to obtain a building permit while the City determines whether to partially reimburse the developer by making an adjustment or accepting the independent fee calculation. Section 8. Credits. A fee payer can request that a credit, or credits, be awarded to the fee payer for the value of dedicated land, improvements to, or new construction of any system improvements provided by the developer to facilities that are identified in the Capital Facilities Plan and that 'are required by the City as a condition of approving the development activity. Section 9. Appeals. A. Any fee payer may pay the impact fees imposed by this ordinance under protest in order to obtain a building permit. B. Appeals regarding parks impact fees imposed on any development activity may only be taken by the fee payer of the property where such development activity will occur. No appeal shall be permitted unless and until the impact fee at issue has been paid. C. Determinations of the City staff with respect to the applicability of parks impact fees to a given development activity, or the availability of a credit, can be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner pursuant to this section. D. An appeal shall be taken within 10 working days of payment of the impact fees under protest or within 10 working days of the City's issuance of a written determination of a credit or exemption decision by filing with the City Clerk a notice of appeal giving the reasons for the appeal with an accompanying appeal fee as set forth in the existing fee schedule for land use decisions. Section 10. Refunds. A. If the City fails to expend or encumber the impact fees within six years from the date the fees were paid, unless extraordinary circumstances or reasons exist, the current owner of the property on which the impact fees were paid may receive a refund of such fees. B. The City shall notify potential claimants by first class mail that they are entitled to a refund. In determining whether impact fees have been expended or encumbered, impact fees shall be considered expended or encumbered on a first -in, first out basis. C. Owners seeking a refund must submit a written request for a refund of the fees to the City within one year of the date the right to claim a refund arises or notice is given, whichever comes later. D. Any impact fees for which no application has been made within the one -year period shall be retained by the City and expended on appropriate parks facilities. E. Refunds of impact fees shall include any interest earned on the impact fees by the City. Section 11. Exemptions. The parks impact fees are generated from the formula for calculating the fees as set forth in this ordinance. The amount of the impact fees is determined by the information contained in the adopted parks master plan and related documents, as appended to the City's Comprehensive Plan. All new development located in the City will be charged a parks impact fee, provided that the following exemptions shall apply. Any development activity or project which has submitted a technically complete building permit application prior to the effective date of this C: \Documents and Settings \All Users Desktop Kelly MSDATA Ordinances Parks Impact rees.doc LV:ksn 11/25/2008 Page 4 of 5 ordinance shall be exempt from the payment of parks impact fees. The following shall be exempt from parks impact fees: 1. Replacement of a structure with a new structure having the same use, at the same site, and when such replacement is within 12 months of demolition or destruction of the previous structure; 2. Alteration or expansion of or remodeling of an existing dwelling or structure where no new units are created and the use is not changed; 3. Construction of an accessory residential structure; 4. Miscellaneous improvements including, but not limited to, fences, walls, swimming pools, and signs; 5. Demolition of or moving an existing structure within the City from one site to another; 6. Low income housing developed by individuals, nonprofit corporations, or a housing authority may be exempted from impact fees at the discretion of City staff subject to: a. Fiscal impact analysis of the effect of impact fees upon low- income housing and how exempting housing from impact fees would forward the goals for low income housing in the City and King County; b. That adequate documentation be provided that the housing will remain available for low- income persons for a 10 -year period of time at affordable rents; and c. In the case of owner- occupied dwellings, that such housing will be sold or leased at affordable rates to low- income households for a period of 10 years; and d. The impact fee for exempt development shall be calculated as provided by this ordinance and paid with public funds. Such payments may be made by including such amounts in the public share of the system improvements undertaken within the City for parks services and facilities. Section 12. Authority Unimpaired. Nothing in this Ordinance shall preclude the City from requiring the fee payer to mitigate adverse and environmental affects of a specific development pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, Chapters 43.21C RCW and /or Chapter 58.17 RCW, governing plats and subdivisions, provided that the exercise of this authority is consistent with Chapters 43.21C and 82.02 RCW. Section 13. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 14. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2008. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney Jim Haggerton, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: Attachment: Tukwila Parks Impact Fees, 2008, Exhibit A Tukwila Parks Capital Facilities List, Exhibit B C: \Documents and Settings \All Users Desktop Kelly \MSDATA \Ordinances \Parks Impact Fees.doc LV:ksn 11/25/2008 Page 5 of 5 TABLE 1: 2008 Park Impact Fee Calculations Land Use 51.6 I I I 2,384 I I 1,482 370,500 I 133 I 4,836 2,418,000 435 I 4,826 1 3,860,800 434 2,900 I 11,144 1 6,649,300 I 1,003 2.54 2.44 3,198 2.49 2.44 14,484 1.00 1,349 1.00 4,401 1.00 4,392 27,823 Note: $11,025,000 is 90% of $12,250,000 EXHIBIT A Tukwila Parks Impact Fees, 2008 2007 2007 2007 Building 2020 Housing 2020 2020 Building Housing Employment Area -3 Units Employme Area Units -1 2 nt I Single- family 3,822 I 4,338 Multi- family 4,107 I 6,491 Office 6,245 1,561,250 I 7,727 Retail 20,384 10,192,000 25,220 Industrial 20,343 16,274,400 25,169 'TOTALS 7,929 46,972 28,027,650 I 10,829 58,116 1. OFM 2. PSRC 2007 Covered Emplooyment Estimates 3. Retail: 500gsf per emp; Office: 250gsf per emp; Industrial: 800gsf per emp; X emp growth 4. 43 SF du/yr; rest is MF from 2007 Buildable Lands Report 5. 90% of Buildable Lands Report estimates, at same as 2007 employment 6. Tukwila Resident/Non Tukwila resident breakdown based on 2000 census data In 2000, the number of residents who live and work in Tukwila is 1,502, out of a population of 17,181 Net Growth, 2008 2020 Housing Units Employment Building Employment: Employment: 4 -5 Area 3 Tukwila Non Tukwila Residents Residents 9 -6 91 -6 11.49% 52.06% 4.85% 15.82% 15.78% 100.00% 1,349 4,401 4,392 I 10,141 1,931,750 12,610,000 20,135,200 34,676,950 Impact Fee Persons per Use Ratio Total Use Use by Cost Per Housing Per 1,000 Rounded Housing Unit Between by Land Land Use Allocation Unit GFA Residents/ Use Category Employees Category $0 I $0.00 SO $0 I $0.00 SO $0 $0.00 SO $0 $0.00 SO SO $0.00 SO SO I 9% Tukwila Parks Capital Facilities List Project List Impact Fees 2009 to 2015 Duwamish Riverbend Hill Trail Connections Tukwila Pond City of Tukwila Pool Boat Launch TOD Pedestrian Bridge EXHIBIT B Develop Phase II Green River Trail to Renton Black/Cedar River Development Phase II [Extend land lease]; expand features and services Christianson, Codiga, Fort Dent, Log Cabin Sounder Connection Project Cost 3,000,000 1,000,000 3,000,000 1,500,000 750,000 2,000,000 Total 11,250,000 DRAFT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T UKWILA, WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING THE ASSESSMENT OF FIRE IMPACT FEES ON NEW RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT MI THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTWE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Growth Management Act of the State of Washington and RCW 36.70A, the City of Tukwila has art adopted Comprehensive Plan, which includes provisions for fire protection facilities as part of its Capital Facilities Element; and WHEREAS, RCW 82.02.050 authorizes cities to impose impact fees on development activity as part of the financing for public facilities, including fire protection facilities; and WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council desires to provide funding for fire protection facilities, as referenced in the Capital Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan, through the imposition of residential and non residential development impact fees beginning January 1, 2009; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. The City Council finds and determines that new growth and development in the City creates additional demand and need for public fire protection facilities in the City, and the City Council finds that new growth and development should pay its proportionate share of the costs for new fire service facilities to serve new growth and development in the City. The City Council believes that this can be accomplished by the assessment of fire impact fees on new residential, commercial, and industrial development in the City. It is the Council's intent that the provisions of this ordinance be liberally construed in establishing the fire impact fee program. Section 2. Definitions. Terms or words not defined herein shall be defined pursuant to RCW 82.02.090 when given their usual and customary meaning. For the purposes of this ordinance, unless the context or subject matter clearly requires otherwise, the words or phrases defined in this section shall have the following meanings: 1. The "Act" means the Growth Management Act, Chapter 17, Laws of 1990, First Extraordinary Session, Chapter 36.70A RCW et seq., and Chapter 32, Laws of 1991, First Special Session, as now in existence or hereinafter amended. 2. "Building permit" means an official document or certification of the City of Tukwila issued by the City's building official which authorizes the construction, alteration, enlargement, conversion, reconstruction, remodeling, rehabilitation, erection, placement, demolition, moving, or repair of a building or structure. 3. "City" means the City of Tukwila, Washington, County of King. 4. "Development activity" means any construction of a building or structure that creates additional demand and need for fire safety facilities. C: \Documents and Settings \All Users Desktop Kelly MSDATA Ordinances Fire Impact Feesdoc LV:ksn 11/25/2008 Page 1 of 5 5. "Development approval" means any written authorization from the City, which authorizes the commencement of the "development activity." 6. "Encumber" means to reserve, set aside, or earmark the fire impact fees in order to pay for commitments, contractual obligations, or other liabilities incurred for the provision of fire protective services. 7. "Fee payer" is a person, corporation, partnership, an incorporated association or governmental agency, municipality, or similar entity commencing a land development activity that requires a building permit and creates a demand for additional fire capital facilities. 8. "Impact fee" means the payment of money imposed by the City on development activity pursuant to this ordinance as a condition of granting development approval in order to pay for the fire facilities needed to serve new growth and development that is a proportionate share of the cost of fire capital facilities that is used for facilities that reasonably benefit new development. Impact fees do not include a reasonable permit fee, an application fee, and the administrative fee for collecting and handling fire impact fees or cost of reviewing independent fee calculations. 9. "Owner" means the owner of record of real property, as found in the records of King County, Washington, or a person with an unrestricted written option to purchase property; provided, that if the real property is being purchased under a recorded real estate contract, the purchaser shall be considered the owner of the property. 10. "Proportionate share" means that portion of the cost for fire facility improvements that are reasonably related to the service demands and needs of new development. 11. "Public facilities" means the following capital facilities owned or operated by governmental entities: (1) public streets and roads; (2) publicly owned parks and open spaces and recreational facilities; (3) school facilities; (4) fire protection facilities not part of a fire district; and (5) police facilities and essential public facilities as defined by Chapter 36.70A RCW. Section 3. Fire Impact Fee Assessment. A. The City shall collect fire impact fees from applicants seeking development approvals from the City for any development activity in the City for which building permits are required, effective January 1, 2009. This will include the expansion of existing uses, which create the demand for fire protection services. B. Fire impact fees shall be assessed at the time of a technically complete building permit application that complies with the City's zoning ordinances and building and development codes. Fire impact fees shall be collected from the fee payer at the time the building permit is issued. C. Except if otherwise exempt, the City shall not issue the required building permit unless or until the fire impact fees are paid. Section 4. Use of Fire Impact Fees. A. Pursuant to this ordinance, fire impact fees shall be used for fire facilities that will reasonably benefit the City and its residents. B. Fees shall not be used to make up deficiencies in City facilities serving an existing development. C. Fees shall not be used for maintenance and operations, including personnel. D. Fire impact fees shall be used for but not limited to land acquisition, site improvements, engineering and architectural services, permitting, financing, administrative expenses and applicable mitigation costs, and capital equipment pertaining to fire protection facilities. C: \Documents and Settings \All Users Desktop Kelly MSDATA Ordinances Fire Impact Fees.doc LV:ksn 11/25/2008 Page 2 of 5 E. Fire impact fees may also be used to recoup public improvement costs incurred by the City to the extent that new growth and development will be served by the previously constructed improvement. F. In the event bonds or similar debt instruments are or have been issued for fire facility improvements, impact fees may be used to pay the principal on such bonds. Section 5. Fire Impact Fee Capital Facilities Plan. In order to collect fire impact fees, the City must first adopt a Fire Capital Facilities Plan as an element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's Capital Facilities Plan for fire protection services shall consist of the following elements: 1. The City's capacity over the next six years, based on an inventory of the City's fire facilities both existing and under construction; 2. The forecast of future needs for fire facilities based upon the City's population projections; 3. A six-year financial plan component, updated as necessary, to maintain at least a six-year forecast for financing needed within projected funding levels; 4. Application of the formula set forth in this ordinance based upon the information in the Capital Facilities Plan; and 5. City Council Action. No new or revised impact fee shall be effective until adopted by the City Council following a duly advertised public hearing to consider the City's Capital Facilities Plan or plan update. Section 6. Fire Impact Fee Formula. The impact fee formula is based on the assumptions found in Tukwila Fire Impact Fees, 2008, Exhibit A, and Tukwila Fire Department Capital Facilities List, Exhibit B, attached hereto and by this reference fully incorporated herein. Land Use Single family Multi- family Office Retail Industrial FIRE IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Impact Fee Per Residential Unit I Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. GFA Section 7. Fire Impact Fee Adjustments. A. The City may adjust a fire impact fee at the time the fee is imposed to consider unusual circumstances in specific cases to ensure that impact fees are imposed fairly. B. In calculating the fee imposed on a particular development, the City shall permit consideration of studies and data submitted by a developer to adjust the amount of the fee. The developer shall submit an independent fee calculation study to the Fire Chief who shall review the study to determine that the study: 1. is based on accepted impact fee assessment practices and methodologies; 2. uses acceptable data sources and the data used is comparable with the uses and intensities planned for the proposed development activity; 3. complies with the applicable state laws governing impact fees; 4. is prepared and documented by professionals who are mutually agreeable to the City and the developer and are qualified in their respective fields; and 5. shows the basis upon which the independent fee calculation was made. C. In reviewing the study, the Fire Chief may require the developer to submit additional or different documentation. If an acceptable study is presented, the Fire Chief may adjust the fee to that appropriate for the particular development activity. If C: \Documents and Setting \All Users \Desktop\ Kelly \MSDATA \Ordinances \Fire Impact Fees.doc LV:ksn 11/25/2008 Page 3 of 5 an acceptable study is not presented, the developer shall pay the impact fees required prior to submitting the study. D. A developer requesting an adjustment or independent fee calculation may pay the impact fees imposed by this ordinance to obtain a building permit while the City determines whether to partially reimburse the developer by making an adjustment or accepting the independent fee calculation. Section 8. Credits. A fee payer can request that a credit, or credits, be awarded to the fee payer for the value of dedicated land, improvements to, or new construction of any system improvements provided by the developer to facilities that are identified in the Capital Facilities Plan and that are required by the City as a condition of approving the development activity. Section 9. Appeals. A. Any fee payer may pay the impact fees imposed by this ordinance under protest in order to obtain a building permit. B. Appeals regarding fire impact fees imposed on any development activity may only be taken by the fee payer of the property where such development activity will occur. No appeal shall be permitted unless and until the impact fee at issue has been paid. C. Determinations of the City staff with respect to the applicability of fire impact fees to a given development activity, or the availability of a credit, can be appealed to the City's Hearing Examiner pursuant to this section. D. An appeal shall be taken within 10 working days of payment of the impact fees under protest or within 10 working days of the City's issuance of a written determination of a credit or exemption decision by filing with the City Clerk a notice of appeal giving the reasons for the appeal with an accompanying appeal fee as set forth in the existing fee schedule for land use decisions. Section 10. Refunds. A. If the City fails to expend or encumber the impact fees within six years from the date the fees were paid, unless extraordinary circumstances or reasons exist, the current owner of the property on which the impact fees were paid may receive a refund of such fees. B. The City shall notify potential claimants by first class mail that they are entitled to a refund. In determining whether impact fees have been expended or encumbered, impact fees shall be considered expended or encumbered on a first -in, first out basis. C. Owners seeking a refund must submit a written request for a refund of the fees to the City within one year of the date the right to claim a refund arises or notice is given, whichever comes later. D. Any impact fees for which no application has been made within the one -year period shall be retained by the City and expended on appropriate fire facilities. E. Refunds of impact fees shall include any interest earned on the impact fees by the City. Section 11. Exemptions. The fire impact fees are generated from the formula for calculating the fees as set forth in this ordinance. The amount of the impact fees is determined by the information contained in the adopted fire department master plan and related documents, as appended to the City's Comprehensive Plan. All new development located in the City will be charged a fire impact fee, provided that the following exemptions shall apply. Any development activity or project which has submitted a technically complete building permit application prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall be exempt from the payment of fire impact fees. The following shall be exempt from fire impact fees: C \Documents and Setting \All Users Desktop Kelly MSDATA Ordinances Fire Impact Fees.doc LV:ksn 11/25/2008 Page 4 of 5 1. Replacement of a structure with a new structure having the same use, at the same site, and when such replacement is within 12 months of demolition or destruction of the previous structure; 2. Alteration or expansion of or remodeling of an existing dwelling or structure where no new units are created and the use is not changed; 3. Construction of an accessory residential structure; 4. Miscellaneous improvements including, but not limited to, fences, walls, swimming pools, and signs; 5. Demolition of or moving an existing structure within the City from one site to another; 6. Low income housing developed by individuals, nonprofit corporations, or a housing authority may be exempted from impact fees at the discretion of City staff subject to: a. Fiscal impact analysis of the effect of impact fees upon low- income housing and how exempting housing from impact fees would forward the goals for low- income housing in the City and King County; b. That adequate documentation be provided that the housing will remain available for low- income persons for a 10 -year period of time at affordable rents; and c. In the case of owner- occupied dwellings, that such housing will be sold or leased at affordable rates to low- income households for a period of 10 years; and d. The impact fee for exempt development shall be calculated as provided by this ordinance and paid with public funds. Such payments may be made by including such amounts in the public share of the system improvements undertaken within the City for fire protection services and facilities. Section 12. Authority Unimpaired. Nothing in this ordinance shall preclude the City from requiring the fee payer to mitigate adverse and environmental affects of a specific development pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, Chapters 43.21C RCW and /or Chapter 58.17 RCW, governing plats and subdivisions, provided that the exercise of this authority is consistent with Chapters 43.21C and 82.02 RCW. Section 13. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 14. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2008. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney Jim Haggerton, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Co uncil: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: Attachments: Exhibit A Tukwila Fire Impact Fees, 2008 Exhibit B Fire Department Capital Facilities List C: \Documents and Setting \All Users Desktop Kelly \MSDATA \Ordinances \Fire Impact Fees.doc LV:ksn 11/25/2008 Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT A Tukwila Fire Impact Fees, 2008 TABLE 1. Tukwila Fire Impact Fee Calculation, 2008 Net Growth, 2008 -2020 2007 2007 Per Housing Building Employme Land Use Housing Employme Residential Units -I nt Z Units 3 Area 4 nt 5 Unit Single family 3,822 516 I $0 Multi- family 4,107 2,384 I $0 Office 6,245 370,500 I 1,482 Retail 20,384 2,418,000 I 4,836 Industrial 20,343 3,860,800 I 4,826 TOTALS 46,972 6,649,300 11,144 I OFM numbers 2. PSRC 2007 Covered Employment Estimates 3. 43 SF du/yr, rest is MF from 2007 Buildable Lands Report 4. Retail: 500gsf per emp; Office: 250gsf per emp; Industrial: 800gsf per emp; X emp growth 5. 90% of Buildable Lands Report estimates, at same as 2007 employment TABLE 2. Tukwila Fire Service Demand Calculation, 2008 Land Use Single family Multi family Office Retail Industrial NET TOTAL Fire Dept. Land Use Categories Public Assembly Educational Health Care* Single family Apartments Boarding House Hotels Business** Industrial Manufacturing Storage SUBTOTAL PERCENT OF SUBTOTAL 2007 Responses Proportion Based al Incident on Net RealIocatio Incident Responses Total n of Responses "Other" 619 13% 19% 249 868 866 19% 26% 349 I 1,215 445 10% 13% 179 625 1,039 22% 31% 418 1,458 362 8% 11% 146 I 508 3,332 71% 100% 1,341 4,673 Other 1,341 29% I TOTAL 4,673 100% 100% 1,341 I 4,673 100% Note: The $13,031,550 capital cost is 90% of $14,479,500 (the growth related fire capital cost), TABLE 3. 2007 Incident Responses by Property Type Allocation to Impact Fee Categories Fire Aid Total I2 42 54 18 30 48 27 90 117 159 460 619 224 570 794 0 2 2 102 203 305 441 590 1,031 12 2 14 57 47 104 81 163 244 1,133 2,199 3,332 Single- Multi- family family 619 619 '794 2 866 19% 26% Revised 2007 Responses 48 70 47 351 445 Impact Fee Incident 0�o Responses per 1,000 Units 19% 227 26% 296 13% 31% 11% 100% IMPACT FEE CATEGORIES Per GFA Per 1,000 Sq. Ft. GFA $0.00 $0 $0.00 I $0 $0.00 $0 Office Retail Industrial TOTAL 54 305 680 14 104 244 1,039 362 3,332 13% 31% 11% 100% Special Property I 275 I 855 I 1,130 Unclassified I I48 63 211 SUBTOTAL I 423 I 918 I 1,341 I I I I Reallocation of Special Property 249 349 179 418 146 1,341 Unclassified TOTAL INCIDENT RESPONSES BY 868 1,215 625 1,458 508 4,673 IMPACT FEE CATEGORY split 60% Multi- family, 40% Office (Redmond) 0 split 34% Office, 66% Retail (2007 Tukwila) Increase in Annual Incident Responses due to Growth Incident Capital Costs Responses Incident Allocated by per 1,000 Responses Incident Employees Responses due to Growth 117 8% $0 705 49% $0 100.0 148 10% $0 71.5 346 24% $0 25.0 120 8% $0 1,437 100% $0 100% EXHIBIT B Fire Department Capital Facilities List Capital Facility Cost 1. Constructibuild relocated Station 51 5,000 gsf S 2,000,000' addition due to new growth in TUC 2. Purchase aid car for Station 51 (new) 185,000 3. Purchase engine for Station 54 to replace aerial S 750,000 ladder truck 4. Purchase land for relocated Station 52, if Station 51 S 544,500 is relocated 5. Construct/build relocated Station 52, if Station 51 is S 3,000,000 relocated TOTAL S 6,479,500 5,000 gsf building addition x $400 /psf building construction cost %z acre site (21,780 sf) x 525 /psf land cost 7,500 gsf building x 5400 /psf building construction cost