HomeMy WebLinkAboutFS 2009-03-03 Item 2F - Report - December 2008 Sales Tax RevenueTO:
City of Tukwila
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton
Rhonda Berry
Finance and Safety Committee
FROM: Shawn Hunstock, Finance Director
DATE: February 23, 2009
SUBJECT: Sales Tax Revenue for December 2008
Schedule I
Sales Receipt 2007 2008 2008 Increase (Decrease) %Increase /(Decrease)
Month Month Actual Estimated Actual Month Y7D Month YTD
Jan Mar 1,324 1,398 1,347 (51) (51) -3.65% 3.64%
Feb Apr 1,350 1,350 1,357 7 (44) 0.52% 1.60%
Mar May 1,707 1,564 1,601 37 (7) 2.37% -0 16%
Apr June 1,482 1,472 1,365 (107) (114) -7.27% -1.97%
May July 1,497 1,497 1,635 138 24 9 22% 0 33%
June Aug 1,768 1,657 1,646 (11) 13 -0.66% 0.15%
July Sept 1,616 1,577 1,535 (42) (29) -2.66% -0 28%
Aug Oct 1,607 1,546 1,555 9 (20) 0 58% -0 17%
Sept Nov 1,704 1,672 1,426 (246) (266) -14 71% -1 94%
Oct Dec 1,597 1,552 1,298 (254) (520) 16.37% 3.40%
Nov Jan09 1,652 1,596 1,265 (331) (851) -20 74% -5.04%
Dec Feb09 2,112 2,164 1,723 (441) (1,292) -20 38% -6.78%
Totals 19,416 19,045 17,753
C :1D0CUME-1\christy\LOCALS- 1\TempIXPGrpW'isellnfo Memo Sales Tax 022309.doc
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
in 1,000's
Sales tax collections showed the fourth consecutive decrease in December compared to the
same month last year. December is typically the highest month of the year for collections, and
December was $459,000 higher than November, but $441,000 below budget for the month.
We now close out 2008 with actual collections $1,292,000 under budget for the year. Actual
collections are 6.78% below budget for the year, and 8.57% below last year's historical high.
The amounts above do not include the mitigation payment we received in December for third
quarter 2008. The mitigation payment was $218,797.89.
As mentioned previously, I sent to the Department of Revenue information on businesses which
were incorrectly included in our mitigation payment calculation, thereby lowering the amount we
received. The list included fifty -seven businesses with sales totaling $14,415,217. The city's
portion of sales tax from these businesses is $122,529. If these businesses were properly
excluded from the mitigation detail, our payment would have been higher by the $122.529
amount.
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
Schedule II shows the year -to -date sales tax from the top 10 categories of retail establishments.
As this schedule indicates, there is no clear pattern to explain the current trend. The variances
are both up and down in these categories.
Schedule II
YTD YTD Dollar
Group Name Current Prior Diff. Diff.
452 General Merchandise Stores 2,231,745 $2,571,601 (339,857) 13.22%
448 Clothing and Accessories 2,101,593 1,838,646 262,948 14 30%
423 Wholesale Trade, Durable Goods 1,777,808 2,326,840 (549,032) 23.60%
722 Food Services, Drinking Places 1,309,329 1,158,424 150,905 13.03%
236 Construction of Buildings 1,302,567 1,432,620 (130,053) -9.08%
443 Electronics and Appliances 1,077,238 1,337,952 (260,714) -19 49%
441 Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealer 993,146 966,530 26,616 2.75%
453 Miscellaneous Store Retailers 721,034 836,152 (115,119) 13.77%
451 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Books 644,522 668,664 (24,142) -3.61%
442 Fumiture and Home Fumishings 621,785 1,063,467 (441,682) 41.53%
As you can see, there are large decreases for those businesses affected most by streamlined
sales tax. Specifically, sales tax for Furniture and Home Furnishings is down by 41.53
Wholesale Trade and Durable Goods is down by 23.60 and Electronics and Appliances is
down by 19.49 These declines are offset by increases in other areas, such as Clothing and
Accessories, which increased by 14.30% and Food Services Drinking Places, which
increased by 13.03 As you can see from Schedule II, seven of the top ten merchant
categories have declined versus prior year.
Attached is a Sales Tax Summary comparing year -to -date 2008 vs 2007 by major SIC codes
Also included is a comparison of total receipts year -to -date for the last four years
Please let me know if you have any comments or questions. Thank you.
C: IDCCUME- lichristy \LOCALS-11TempUCPGrpWiselInfo Memo Sales Tax 022309.doc
e az a r a°\n a p b o ze a rn 0- o m ae ae ti
O m pan o m N m o v, 0, a">
o N N o q a0 v V V e, co< m o
v rn o
e-74-„7T
m m
p m m an y r.� as N o m N O> o N O p n m p
o I� (D a m N O o jr, o •m O H a m m O u-• V mt p m 0
Co M an b ao O N O
Ow 0N v m N N 1 ��M M v>� O V C a n m o m` r b
m
h M
H y W N
p CO p ti N O OD t0 to t
t` a0 t0 3 g ,y 0 (NV m m O,_ p O O• S N N
N [7 ail m A A O N n O a r am t` •N r av 0 U, m 0 N m< a O 00 0 0 cc; G m O l+ m O m OD u�'i t7 m LA O CO O ti m° CO 0.1
O b CO O N co_ a\i m Of M
N co con no,
a No Q(0 m m a o �r^ a 6 o m o •mn 40 o C rn N� ,_CO r i m o 0- am •>man a. O C ti mo m O N a a O v
CO gy m y v v m g_N n�
O r j 0 0 ‘'I CO m A O 0 O O H
O a a O
d E G
Z E 4
ti m
t E
C C
a H a V
V w U a
j 4 O
o 1 m
u U
O 4 G .0
J N U
C N
r.
W W N
Et, F c o O V c .n O c c O O
h U IC,,- 4
c. t h O x. 6-L 6 0 7 8
LL to U 2 O o E E .Z m m 0 c m E Q c an 0 0 .a 0) ,^--t .J 'w 0 2 c K c .4 0 U) W 11 cd
f,
S O m¢ o c a m ry LL z
in ,u d ,a 0 o W o ea n o :s L° -.6 a E w O 3
c_, e' m,a az. m J H ca c 4� Ems¢ G 3 N w
8 E m m o o c 174 >°o L o E E -6 S rte o Y c` vUi
0. wmti x c)rn C7 z� .0 LL MdO <W S o. t- (0 M
L
N m
.0
a
2 d
d
X d-.
a Z
O N h N
N N ��e N
E
W v mT< v v v C v v
z
CO CD
p 1-
Y m
O R
.0 o A vo n o�anm`Nm���N p o mm� 'n b ,-O o o h A O7
V m a C m h
on co O o O Q y m 0 M
W p m0 en o h p cc' N N N Y rn ao<m ao tm N O N Q N co On CO CV
N H H H
v N a0 v c
C v o v e N C N N N N 0 C A o ,..1
n
H 9 )U O 9 ri
W N
Q O c t' O a V N CO a� co M N co O O 00 a F m o O j F m O o a
O o N N N N N m N my o N N V C ,O ta P O Cs!
O. o m y a a ra
E a o
o c c o
M w U a9 U N C
C
o E z
Di
go U
y
U
N 0> cz 0> W
Z c° z 3 3
r- m c m y >0 4 z` 4; m t-
U c 0 n 2 4 F O a n 'o O c g? U O H N U J O� O
y y V U y m o c o d Q o d H O c 4- 8_ °a» o y O p
O o c t cs Y> o 'c U 1.14 o v °a a o -x
O m c U K Z. -g m m g-- o i c W a j C o1 t4 0 w d n c O F
U `o U N I:- 14 w m q U c fg i w E 0 1 Z O -0 ai U• O 0 Q z 2 z w J
c 2 F ZO 5 ,S _1 a c C c K .a m U 3 2E no ,a o 6 Q o 1 K v v o Q 15 3,2V m mEn` m a E ,�,e �a m r 45 W 4 Am r g 5� 8 o J n w
A 1 'x x c o c E a u o H_ Y r`a ra c n O
.5 a 0)(-. °m Ft =¢�3ti ria Udz a>i� 0 >0 F-0_ 0>& ))3 g 3t 3
co mm •r> m i°m 00 co cn on cn
N N N 0> 0, a-> CO V, an N a-> a-> V, 0, >n an .-a V, 0, ah c, v, 0 V, -0 v 0 e v c
Z
2008
L 2007
a)
2006
2005
Four Year Comparison
$4,000,000
17,75),694
$16,763,909 1
I.
$8,000,000 $12,000,000 $16,000,000 $20,000,000
Taxes Collected Year to Date
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
Schedule II shows the year -to -date sales tax from the top 10 categories of retail establishments.
As this schedule indicates, there is no clear pattern to explain the current trend. The variances
are both up and down in these categories
Schedule II
Group Name
423 Wholesale Trade, Durable Goods
452 General Merchandise Stores
448 Clothing and Accessories
722 Food Services, Drinking Places
236 Construction of Buildings
443 Electronics and Appliances
441 Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealer
453 Miscellaneous Store Retailers
451 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Books
721 Accommodation
U Sales Tax12009 \Into Memo Sales Tax 032709.doc
YTD
Current
156,793
136,403
122,233
102,459
83,683
78,402
72,948
48,794
43,963
39,891
YTD Dollar
Prior Diff.
Although we are only looking at one month so far, as you can see there are large variances
from last year for the same time period. For instance, sales tax for Miscellaneous Store
Retailers is down by 20 88 Construction of Buildings is down by 17.33 and Wholesale
Trade and Durable Goods is down by 14.37 These declines are offset by increases in other
areas, such as Food Services and Drinking Places, which increased by 8.14 and
Accommodations, which increased by 5 59 As you can see from Schedule II, six of the top
ten merchant categories have declined versus prior year.
Attached is a Sales Tax Summary comparing year -to -date 2009 vs 2008 by major SIC codes.
Also included is a comparison of total receipts year -to -date for the last four years.
Please let me know if you have any comments or questions. Thank you.
Diff.
183,098 (26,305) -14 37%
150,247 (13,844) -9.21%
117,317 4,916 419%
94,748 7,710 8 14%
101,231 (17,548) -17 33%
82,437 (4,035) -4 89%
70,586 2,362 3 35%
61,671 (12,878) -20 88%
46,371 (2,408) -5 19%
37,779 2,112 5 59%
e e o x o
J p 0 o m o, o o o o N o> o o
ei se
y e o rn
o m o 0 o co r, 5 m p r,
a V u o o co o c N(5 5 rn N
pa
M y.
p o CO 0 0 o a M1 0 o 0 o p cv co
N r e r r N °m r o
o m o m vi n m mo CO N 01 Cra
cd u5 CO r C•1 00 o CO
Z
4P, arr
O J M u
O O N m o a:> 0 m O o s O
o m
22 a a o'
2
CL o D_ o d
I" 5-
E.' 5 EO
A C
H CO o U
U U rn
5 o
t
C
o Z
CO
1 c 0- a
m
w w m O m 3
r 0 a N L °i w 0 O w r
J L
0 0 w a E 6 i m m n om o w 0 0 a p Z
Q a w 0
°a
v o. 0 0 x o E E_ E ro w 0
o E Ts. m in J Z w o
z �a ��m 0 4 �zEy X J a) m N c N L w E Q 0 ‘7, C y H 72 m o O c N c Q m o o E m v L F Y r 1 y
0 ID O n_ w w to_ O CO 0' Z O F it 00 d U Q W S 0 0 0 Cl_ Or J Q
Q v V U co 4 .4 V V or or or V C co to to
V or a° v, v, u, v, iO tv m rn p
z
0
r m
Y
o e m> 0
Y e. o n 0 q ci
e
c
z
ei
0 m
o
at
m o Y o Y cn
On CO
p p o CO p o o p co co r
00
co o. m o N 017
J o f m 0 o N J
Q w N F 0 m o Q 0 (5° _.8:_ oo
o
r O o O 0 v r N m y v, h CO m f 0 0
07 01 0 m m O
�o a o a o a o
c E
Ca c c
C N Z-7., U O a U
Or 0
j O t
x o
CI- o
5 z c 3 5 0 3 cd
o v o o
a -wog a g 0 _o 'a o -u( 0=
co a r
c U o g o a E a 0 4 c o o 3 0 0 c) a
m H V Q m a d a'=i a c' r' w Q a o N d ti p a d'
a,r 5 2 my `O 23.- m v N a w
t. °O A~ �,a m °.n 06 a o� z c c (7 o u e,Q 3 o z w
.9 _o rn a�°a c a) E xr �U =w t om c z a m ti 2 w
i
0SCO wm r 2 a a` d ci a z° ii i g w ii <¢,`r
ao
Four Year Comparison
2009 1
-I .1 I
a) 1
2008 1
as
1._
$7'047,251
-I
2007 1 $1,323,923
2006 1 $1,239,424 1
1=
$500,000 $1,000,000
Taxes Collected Year to Date
I $1,172,089
$1,500,000