HomeMy WebLinkAboutFS 2009-06-02 Item 2C - Report - March 2009 Sales Tax RevenueTO:
City of Tukwila
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton
Rhonda Berry
Finance and Safety Committee
FROM. Shawn Hunstock, Finance Director
DATE: May 28, 2009
SUBJECT Sales Tax Revenue for March 2009
Schedule I
in 1,000's
Sales Receipt 2008 2009 2009 Increase /(Decrease) %Increase /(Decrease)
Month Month Actual Estimated Actual Month YTD Month YTD
Jan Mar 1,347 1,403 1,172 (231) (231) 16.46% 0 00%
Feb Apr 1,357 1,397 1,051 (346) (577) -24 77% -20 61%
Mar May 1,601 1,654 1,146 (508) (1,085) -30 71% 24.36%
Apr June 1,365 1,497 (1,497) (2,582) -100 00% -43 39%
May July 1,635 1,560 (1,560) (4,142) -100 00% -55 15%
June Aug 1,646 1,757 (1,757) (5,899) -100 00% -63 65%
July Sept 1,535 1,661 (1,661) (7,560) -100 00% -69 17%
Aug Oct 1,555 1,647 (1,647) (9,207) 100 00% 73.21%
Sept Nov 1,426 1,685 (1,685) (10,892) 100.00% -76 38%
Oct Dec 1,298 1,521 (1,521) (12,413) -100 00% -78 65%
Nov Jan10 1,265 1,589 (1,589) (14,002) -100 00% -80 61%
Dec Feb10 1,723 2,175 (2,175) (16,177) -100 00% -82 76%
Totals 17,753 19,546 3,369
Mitigation Received
395
3,764 84.51% of Budget Ind Mitigation
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
Sales tax collections showed the seventh consecutive decrease in March compared to the same
period in the prior year. March historically has one of the highest receipt volumes of the year,
but for 2009 collections were significantly less than both budget and the same month in the prior
year. Actual receipts for March 2009 were $508,000 less than budget, and $455,000 less than
the same period last year. We are now down 24.4% for the year compared to budget, and
21.7% compared to the same period last year.
The chart above also includes the mitigation payment we received at the end of March for fourth
quarter 2008. Including the mitigation payment, we are currently just under 85% of budget for
the year to date. The mitigation payment we received was $394,987.43. This was an 80 5%
increase from the $218,797.89 in mitigation we received for third quarter 2008.
Schedule II shows the year -to -date sales tax from the top ten industry classifications As this
schedule indicates, the trend is flat or down for all ten classifications.
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
Schedule 11
Group
452*
448*
423*
722*
443*
441*
236
453*
451*
444*
Mitigated NAICS Code
As you can see there are large variances from last year for the same time period. For instance,
sales tax for Construction of Buildings is down by 55.41 Wholesale Trade and Durable Goods
is down by 36.36 and Building Material and Garden is down by 27.76 These declines are
offset by very small increases in other areas, such as Clothing and Accessories, which
increased by 4.36 and Food Services and Drinking Places, which increased by 1.68 As
you can see from Schedule II, eight of the top ten merchant categories have declined versus
prior year, and nine of the ten industry classification codes are ones for which we receive
streamlined sales tax mitigation.
Schedule III shows the ten largest declines in sales tax revenue for industries with over $10,000
collected in April.
Schedule III
Name
General Merchandise Stores
Clothing and Accessories
Wholesale Trade, Durable Goods
Food Services, Drinking Places
Electronics and Appliances
Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealer
Construction of Buildings
Miscellaneous Store Retailers
Sporting Goods, Hobby, Books
Building Material and Garden
Group Name
323* Printing and Related Support
236 Construction of Buildings
442* Furniture and Home Furnishings
518 Internet Service Providers
454* Nonstore Retailers
423* Wholesale Trade, Durable Goods
713 Amusement, Gambling, and Rec
447* Gasoline Stations
621 Ambulatory Health Care Service
336 Transportation Equipment Man
Mitigated NAICS Code
Attached is a Sales Tax Summary comparing year -to -date 2009 vs. 2008 by major SIC
Also included is a comparison of total receipts year -to -date for the last four years
Please let me know if you have any comments or questions. Thank you
H (Sales Tax120091Info Memo Sales Tax 063009.doc
YTD YTD Dollar
Current Prior Diff. Diff.
575,818 662,412 (86,595) 13.07%
569,121 545,172 23,949 4 39%
468,320 735,906 (267,585) -36 36%
414,538 407,699 6,839 1 68%
306,935 332,627 (25,692) -7 72%
256,954 320,709 (63,755) -19 88%
193,667 434,367 (240,700) -55 41%
178,342 241,952 (63,610) 26.29%
170,380 192,787 (22,408) -11 62%
153,666 212,726 (59,060) -27 76%
YTD YTD Dollar
Current Prior Diff. Diff.
21,324 69,191 (47,867) 69.18%
193,667 434,367 (240,700) -55 41%
118,160 256,589 (138,429) -53 95%
19,333 32,833 (13,500) -41 12%
27,169 44,118 (16,949) -38 42%
468,320 735,906 (267,585) -36 36%
17,280 26,324 (9,045) -34 36%
19,127 29,031 (9,905) -34 12%
20,032 29,297 (9,265) -31 62%
50,906 72,094 (21,189) -29 39%
codes.
p tr
ae
J a i� �.M ae v p r m e i p m
,VsZ °f
Y e Y Y? N M
i m o m a orn mo 0
N co b r r N u' o o O O
N N
N I Loss-
0 0 c r ,n N r N m o o oo
CI 0 rc
M 0 0/MN 0, c0 N Yo rn o o v o
CV CV cr CVN
N w
w J w J m O> r w
rn r,-3- N O O� y v °M .-o ma
M j
o o Nl N O o j
II 12 a� w
m I, p` o
p t G EE
O E ti 2
C w C w z C
V t
U t U C
y U
j A
j C h N 10
W m W m °i m 'l.,
j Q Y j h t N O W c Fa-•
o v w m .g 7,3 5 A 0 E F D
0 o 0 a L ,t d v 8- ct o w a w LL o z
8ftVE22- g, a s y 0 E 1 m_ ;5. wi J 21 c Z u E°° A° w o
z N as .Y >Z m C d c m ?3 -0 'Z E 1 05
u¢ m m°0 S c oc�w Ems¢ 3 �w
o b: 2 v= t r d¢ E c w d o= °e o `w 3 c m U
c
w o c y 6 o o E E° �o 7 °-1 ~o c- u ,n
0, ,mm 2 (JIN 0 m z H ir w 2 U Q W S a Q O d z Q
W
a
N v v v �o v N
v c v c v
Q
en
POT
.n m.n.n ,n.n,n ti mm
to
b °j
1-.0
7- e H
b M ti
tr h
O v j ,0 p o W p v
4t N Y
m v o o° co o o N O y
Y an e b T m o O m tr Y M 4
o` M
p o p mo
O m M o v o o F- o m m
0 Q m-,,,, 0 c6 r M r ti T r r
A
w
A
--Jr-,0,
o r O o" 0 0 o T
a vmi m rn N 2 o m j a o v F m o o
0 o 0-
m v .ri ad Q N v r o
d a
a 4 0 N p 0 0
o w
E p
O` E
G m CO
w C
s w U w U t
v co
CO
o m
Z N N M M M M M M M M M a v« r v v o
Four Year Comparison
$4,560,54:
$5,862,108
2006 $5,322,648
s- $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $4000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000
000 $3,000,
Taxes Collected Year to Date