HomeMy WebLinkAboutTrans 2014-06-09 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila
Transportation Committee
• Allan Ekberg, Chair
• Dennis Robertson
• Kate Kruller
Distribution:
A. Ekberg
D. Robertson
K. Kruller
D. Quinn
Mayor Haggerton
D. Cline
L. Humphrey
B. Giberson
F. Iriarte
R. Tischmak
G. Labanara
P. Brodin
S. Kerslake
Clerk File Copy
2 Extra
Place pkt pdf on Z: \TC -UC
Agendas
e -mail cover to: A. Le,
C. O'Flaherty, D.
Almberg, B. Saxton,
S. Norris, M. Hart, L.
Humphrey
AGENDA
MONDAY, JUNE 9, 2014 — 5:15 PM
FOSTER CONFERENCE ROOM — 6300 BUILDING
(formerly known as Conference Room #1)
� �It m
Recomme ded Actions
Pale
1. PRESENTATION(S)
2. BUSINESS AGENDA
a) 2014 Bridge Inspections — 196th — 200th Street Bridge Repair
a) Information Only
Pg. 1
King County Discretionary Assistance
b) 2014 Overlay and Repair Program
b) Forward to 6/16/14
Pg. 9
Bid Award
Regular Consent Agenda
c) Tukwila MIC Smart Street Non - Motorized Project
c) Forward to 6/16/14
Pg. 17
Acceptance of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Grant
Regular Consent Agenda
d) King County Metro Transit Updates
d) Information Only
Pg. 21
e) Transportation Committee Goals/Work Item Ideas
e) Discussion Only
Pg. 25
3. SCATBd
f) • Draft Oil Train Letter to Governor Jay Inslee
f) Discussion Only
Pg. 27
• 11/26/13 Rail Plan Comment Letter to Ron Pate
4. MISCELLANEOUS
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS
Future Agendas:
Next Scheduled Meeting: Monday, June 23, 2014
6. The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
Please contact the Public Works Department at 206- 433 -0179 for assistance.
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
By: Grant Griffin, Senior Program Manager
DATE: June 6, 2014
SUBJECT: 2014 Bridge Inspections - 196th - 200th Street Bridge Repair
Project No. 91410402
King County Discretionary Assistance
ISSUE
Pursue a project to repair the approach slab seat on the west end of the Tukwila /Kent,
jointly owned, 196th -200th Street Bridge under the 2014 Bridge Inspection Program,
using the King County Discretionary Work Program.
BACKGROUND
The approach slab seat on the west end of the 196th -200th Street Bridge has
sustained damage due to slab foundation fill settlement and resulting slab movement.
The west end sidewalks approaching the bridge have also sustained damage due to
pressure from the approach slab movement.
DISCUSSION
The approach slab fill settlement has been recorded on the routine bridge inspection
report for a number of inspection cycles. Settlement has allowed the slab to rotate at
the connection to the west bridge abutment causing concrete spalling and a bump at
the bridge approach. The movement caused buckling of the sidewalk on the
southwest corner of the bridge and was reported to Public Works on May 29, 2014.
The settlement has reached the point where a repair is necessary for public safety and
to protect the bridge from further damage. The King County Bridge Structural Engineer
has inspected the bridge and determined that no restrictions are necessary as we
pursue the repair project.
FISCAL IMPACT
This project is in the early stages of development and repair options are being
determined and estimates prepared. The cost of the work is expected to fall within the
budget of the 2014 Bridge Inspection Program. Updates to the committee will be
presented as the information becomes available.
RECOMMENDATION
Information only.
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Bridge Inspection Report
W:1PW EngIPROJECTSIA- RW & RS Prajects\Bridge Inspection Programs IBridge Inspections 2014 (91410402)1196th_200th BridgelInfo Memo King Co Discretionary 196th - 200th Bridge - sb.docx
1
Project Site
196TH — 200TH Street Bridge
VICINITY MAP
196th -200th Street Bridge — Federal Structure Identifier 8712100
Inspection on June 2, 2014 by Tukwila Public Works, Grant Griffin and Scott Moore.
Tukwila Road Maintenance requested an engineering review of the situation on the west end of the
196th- 200th Street Bridge that had caused the sidewalk to buckle on the Southwest approach. Review of
the bridge revealed an ongoing problem of roadway fill settlement causing unanticipated movement of
the west approach slab. This movement has caused damage to the approach slab seat and a bump at
the slab bridge transition.
Further investigation and analysis of the bridge plans indicate that no traffic restrictions are necessary
but that a repair project is warranted to prevent further damage. The King County Bridge Structural
Engineer has inspected the damage and is in concurrence with this assessment.
See detailed photos of the damage below:
3
1- Settlement top of traffic barrier above NW corner abutment — approach slab interface.
4
2- Void behind West Abutment wall Spalling Concrete where slab connection is failing.
Construction falsework is still in place. Void is approx. 10 feet deep or more. Reinforced fill on
roadway side is supporting approx. two - thirds of the slab but is able to rotate causing spalling of
the outside edge of the approach slab seat. No movement visible with traffic loads. Settlement
is happening for the entire width of the bridge.
5
3- Settlement of slab on SW corner. Barrier with Fractured Fin finish visible. Initial settlement
marked to track additional settlement. Void and falsework to left is same location as picture
No.2 above.
6
BAN
���ul
im '
!PI
4- View of void on NW corner. Slab settlement and falsework visible. Abutment wall column at left.
7
»1
1
5- Slab settlement on NW Corner. Location above void shown in photo No.3
8
City of Tukwila
TO:
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director42
BY: David Sorensen, Project Manager
DATE: June 6, 2014
SUBJECT: 2014 Overlay and Repair Program
Project No. 91410401
Bid Award
ISSUE
Award the bid for construction of the 2014 Overlay and Repair Program.
BACKGROUND
This project is to preserve and maintain the street structure in a safe and useable condition. Project
construction will include pavement repairs and an asphalt overlay of eight locations citywide. Work
will also include new pavement markings.
ANALYSIS
A call for bids was advertised for the 2014 Overlay and Repair Program on May 14 and 21, 2014
and five bids were opened on May 28, 2014. The lowest apparent bidder was Miles Resources, LLC,
with a bid of $1,069,794.00. The engineer's estimate was $1,195,130.00. One math error was found
on the bid tabulations. Project design consultant KPG Inc. concurred award to apparent low bidder
Miles Resources, LLC. Miles Resources is the current contractor for the Overlay and Repair — East
Marginal Way S Project.
BUDGET AND BID SUMMARY (All amounts include sales tax)
Bid Results Estimate 2014 Budget
Bid Schedule "A" Amount $ 891,722.00 $ 971,350.00 $1,225,000.00
Contingency (5 %) 44,586.10
Bid Schedule "B" Fort Dent 178,072.00 223,780.00 200,000.00
Contingency (5 %) 8,903.60
Funds to Thorndyke Elementary 0.00 0.00 ($300,000.00)
Total $1,123 283.70 $1195,130.00 $1,125 000.00
RECOMMENDATION
Council is being asked to award the construction contract for the 2014 Overlay and Repair Program
to Miles Resources, LLC in the amount of $1,069,794.00 and consider this item on the Consent
Agenda at the June 16, 2014 Regular Meeting.
Attachments: Vicinity Map
2014 CIP Page 15 & 38
Bid Tabulation
Consultant Recommendation
W:IPW EngIPROJECTSIA- RW & RS ProjectslAnnual Overlay & Repair Programs12014 Overlay & Repair Program (91410401)IDesignlAd and AwardlAward\Working Docs\Docs to TC Bid Award\Final Docs to
TC11nfo Memo Bid Award Miles- sb.doc
9
v s m r
49TH AVE S
S 107TH ST
S 112TH ST
GOLF
COWRY
GOA
suinl
� �I S 116\
11114 x\
slotml
1y�14F-17+s1
S 114TH ST
sr
'51
- -- f __-I s i55 %I_
—�3
sr t d g.51 -.
1 A
srtllls +_._ c' 4 r+ s144sr I.
Stµ SL 1 — �� "
I
�!'' -__ 4..§140 5! * -
WE :s i''''f ; NF
Al \� -_ s 1st
9 751157 5152 7_ nj
�lr
5} S[ 515! Sf! "A /'r --- AI
S 152ND ST
FORT DENT P
s
40TH AVE S
Ia
S ST
sl
5
X61
City of Tukwila
2014 Overlay Program
EVANS BLAC
10
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2014 to 2019
PROJECT: Annual Overlay and Repair Program Project No. 81310401
DESCRIPTION: Select, design and construct asphalt and concrete pavement overlays of arterial and residential streets.
JUSTIFICATION:
Pmsemeand main�in�eo�eeLoku�ureinoea� and usaaNam��bymau�adnQbe�roh�|uewh�h�oo
minimizes costs. Some individual sites may be coordinated with water, sewer, and surface water projects.
STATUS: Each year various sections of roadway throughout the City are designed arid constructed for asphalt overlay.
MAINT. IMPACT: Reduces annual mantenance.
COMMENT: Ongoing project. OnIy orie year actuals shown in first column,
FINANCIAL
(in $000's)
EXPENSES
Design
Lund (R8«0
Const. Mgmt.
Construction
TOTAL EXPENSES
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant
Proposed Grant
Mitigation Actual
Mitigation Expected
City Oper. Revenue
TOTAL SOURCES
Through Estimated
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 BEYOND TOTAL
194
165
969
1,328
100
100
100
175
1,225
1,500
125
175
1,250
1,550
125
175
1,260
1,560
150
200
1,300
1,650
150
200
1,320
1,670
175
225
1,325
1,725
175
225
1,325
1,725
1,294
0
1,540
9,974
12,808
1,328
1,328
100
100
1,500
1,500
1.550
1,550
1,560
1,560
1,650
1,650
1,670
1,670
1,725
1,725
1,725
1,725
0
0
0
0
12,808
12,808
euw'oo19Capital Improvement Program
15
11
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2014 to 2019
90330107
PROJECT: Fort Project ' V'-GVVO2
DESCRIPTION: Regional park of 52 acres requires ongoing capital and maintenance improvements.
The City has assumed major park repairs and maintenance for the picnic area, parking lot, one soccer
JUSTIFICATION: field, trail, pond and all major irifrastructure.
A new playground was installed in 2008 and restrooms were remodeled in 2010. Part of the parking
STATUS: lot overlay was completed with parking tax dollars in 2011. Portion of remaining parking lot paving is
schedule in 2014. Replacement ef the small play structure is stth needed.
MAINT. IMPACT: Ongoing effort from all departments involved; Parks, Streets, Water, Sewer, and Surface Water.
King County transferred the park to the City of Tukwila in 2003. Concessionaire agreement withStarfim
COMMENT:
Sports Complex
FINANCIAL
(in $000's)
EXPENSES
Design
Land (RAN)
Const. Mgmt.
Construction
TOTAL EXPENSES
Through Estimated
2012 2018 20 14 201 20 s 20 17 2018 20 1y BEYOND TOTAL
275
1,292
1,567
20
30
200
250
140
250
1,550
1,940
435
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant
Parking Taxes
REET1(1ut Qtr Paroen)
Mitigation
City Oper. Revenue
TOTAL SOURCES
694
50
823
1,567
250
250
140
1,800
1,940
694
50
140
0
2.873
3,757
Project Location
2014 - 2019 Capital Improvement Program
38
12
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
2014 Overlay Program
Bid Tabulation
May 28, 2014
Corrected math error
KPG
111111.•11L•..VM
1 Engineer's Estimate
Miles Resources, LLC
ICON Materials
Lakeside Industries
Road Construction NW
Watson Asphalt
No. Spec Item Quantity Unit
I Unit Cost Total Cost
Unit Cost Total Cost
Unit Cost Total Cost
Unit Cost Total Cost
Unit Cost Total Cost
Unit Cost Total Cost
ROADWAY (SCHEDULE A)
Al
1 -04
Minor Change
1
FA
$ 15,000.00
15,000.00
$ 15,000.00
15,000.00
$ 15,000.00
15,000.00
$ 15,000.00
15,000.00
$ 15,000.00
15,000.00
$ 15,000.00
15,000.00
A2
1 -07
Resolution of Utility Conflicts
1
FA
$ 10,000.00
10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
10,00000
$ 10,000.00
10,000.00
$ 10,00000
10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
10,000.00
A3
1 -07
SPCC Plan
1
LS
$ 800.00
800.00
$ 500.00
500.00
$ 800.00
800.00
$ 2,000.00
2,000.00
$ 1,000.00
1,000.00
$ 500.00
500.00
A4
1 -09
Mobilization
1
LS
$ 75,000.00
75,000.00
$ 89,000.00
89,000.00
$ 85,000.00
85,000.00
$ 130,000.00
130,000.00
$ 95,000.00
95,000.00
$ 111,000.00
111,000.00
A5
1 -10
Project Temporary Traffic Control
1
LS
$ 125,000.00
125,000.00
$ 60,000.00
60,000.00
$ 40,000.00
40,000.00
$ 125,000.00
125,000.00
$ 87,500.00
87,500.00
$ 128,400.00
128,400.00
A6
2 -02
Asphalt Pavement Removal Incl. Haul
220
SY
$ 40.00
8,800.00
$ 11.00
2,420.00
$ 9.00
1,580.00
$ 20.00
4,400.00
$ 18.00
3,960.00
$ 50.00
11,000.00
A7
2 -02
Cement Conc. Sidewalk Removal Incl. Haul
130
SY
$ 25.00
3,250.00
$ 32.50
4,225.00
$ 26.00
3,380.00
$ 50.00
6,500.00
$ 22.00
2,860.00
$ 50.00
6,500.00
A8
2 -02
Cement Conc. Curb Removal Incl. Haul
420
LF
$ 10.00
4,200.00
$ 8.30
3,486.00
$ 8.00
3,360.00
$ 20.00
8,400.00
$ 7.00
2,940.00
$ 40.00
16,800.00
A9
2 -02
Removal of Structure and Obstruction
1
LS
$ 4,000.00
4,000.00
$ 500.00
500.00
$ 2,500.00
2,500.00
$ 16,000.00
16,000.00
$ 15,000.00
15,000.00
$ 3,500.00
3,500.00
A10
2 -03
Unsuitable Foundation Excavation Incl. Haul
400
CY
$ 50.00
20,000.00
$ 20.00
8,000.00
$ 50.00
20,000.00
$ 50.00
20,000.00
$ 50.00
20,000.00
$ 20.00
8,000.00
All
2 -03
Gravel Borrow Incl. Haul
870
TON
$ 25.00
21,750.00
$ 20.00
17,400.00
$ 30.00
26,100.00
$ 10.00
8,700.00
$ 25.00
21,750.00
$ 15.00
13,050.00
Al2
4 -04
Crushed Surfacing Top Course
190
TON
$ 30.00
5,700.00
$ 25.00
4,750.00
$ 35.00
6,650.00
$ 10.00
1,900.00
$ 55.00
10,450.00
$ 15.00
2,850.00
A13
5 -04
Pavement Repair Excavation Incl. Haul
1,010
CY
$ 55.00
55,550.00
$ 80.00
80,800.00
$ 60.00
60,600.00
$ 70.50
71,205.00
$ 95.00
95,950.00
$ 91.70
92,617.00
A14
5 -04
HMA C1.1 /2" PG 64 -22
2,615
TON
$ 85.00
222,275.00
$ 82.00
214,430.00
$ 84.00
219,660.00
$ 77.00
201,355.00
$ 102.00
266,730.00
$ 93.60
244,764.00
A15
5 -04
HMA for Pavement Repair Cl. 1/2" PG 64 -22
1,970
TON
$ 95.00
187,150.00
$ 100.00
197,000.00
$ 88.00
173,360.00
$ 88.00
173,360.00
$ 102.00
200,940.00
$ 118.80
234,036.00
A16
5 -04
HMA for Prelevel Cl. 1/2" PG64 -22
150
TON
$ 100.00
15,000.00
$ 82.00
12,300.00
$ 104.00
15,600.00
$ 88.00
13,200.00
$ 102.00
15,300.00
$ 118.80
17,820.00
A17
5 -04
Thickened Edge
4,050
LF
$ 3.00
12,150.00
$ 1.00
4,050.00
$ 2.00
8,100.00
$ 2.00
8,100.00
$ 2.50
10,125.00
$ 1.50
6,075.00
A18
5 -04
Drainage Channel
70
LF
$ 5.00
350.00
$ 15.00
1,050.00
$ 10.00
70000
$ 10.00
700.00
$ 1100
770.00
$ 35.00
2,450.00
A19
5 -04
Planing Bituminous Pavement
4,730
SY
$ 5.00
23,650.00
$ 7.50
35,475.00
$ 8.00
37,840.00
$ 8.50
40,205.00
$ 7.50
35,475.00
$ 6.80
32,164.00
A20
5 -04
Jdnt /Crack Sealing
1
FA
$ 2,000.00
2,000.00
$ 2,000.00
2,000.00
$ 2,000.00
2,000.00
$ 2,000.00
2,000.00
$ 2,000.00
2,000.00
$ 2,000.00
2,000.00
A21
7 -12
Adjust Water Valve
13
EA
$ 400.00
7,200.00
$ 300.00
5,400.00
$ 450.00
8,100.00
$ 300.00
5,400.00
$ 650.00
11,700.00
$ 350.00
6,300.00
A22
7 -12
Adjust Water Manhole
5
EA
$ 700.00
3,500.00
$ 400.00
2,000.00
$ 550.00
2,750.00
$ 400.00
2,000.00
$ 850.00
4,250.00
$ 450.00
2,250.00
A23
8 -01
Erosion/Water Pollution Control
1
FA
$ 8,000.00
8,000.00
$ 8,000.00
8,000.00
$ 8,000.00
8,000.00
$ 8,000.00
8,000.00
$ 8,000.00
8,000.00
$ 8,000.00
8,000.00
A24
8 -01
Inlet Protection
32
EA
$ 75.00
2,400.00
$ 70.00
2,240.00
$ 75.00
2,400.00
$ 75.00
2,400.00
$ 75.00
2,400.00
$ 50.00
1,600.00
A25
8 -04
Cement Conc. Traffic Curb and Gutter
500
LF
$ 35.00
17,500.00
$ 19.25
9,625.00
$ 35.00
17,500.00
$ 24.00
12,000.00
$ 30.00
15,000.00
$ 20.00
10,000.00
A26
8 -04
Cement Conc. Traffic Curb
30
LF
$ 35.00
1,050.00
$ 18.10
543.00
$ 35.00
1,050.00
$ 23.00
690.00
$ 30.00
900.00
$ 20.00
600.00
A27
8 -04
Extruded Curb
570
LF
$ 10.00
5,700.00
$ 7.00
3,990.00
$ 9.00
5,130.00
$ 6.25
3,562.50
$ 9.50
5,415.00
$ 8.00
4,560.00
A28
8 -11
Removing Guardrail
220
LF
$ 15.00
3,300.00
$ 14.55
3,201.00
$ 12.00
2,640.00
$ 15.00
3,300.00
$ 3.50
770.00
$ 10.00
2,200.00
A29
8 -11
Beam Guardrail Type 1
160
LF
$ 35.00
5,600.00
$ 32.20
5,152.00
$ 45.00
7,200.00
$ 33.00
5,280.00
$ 38.25
6,120.00
$ 35.00
5,600.00
A30
8 -11
Beam Guardrail Non - Flared Terminal Type TL2
2
EA
$ 2,000.00
4,000.00
$ 1,965.00
3,930.00
$ 3,400.00
6,800.00
$ 2,000.00
4,000.00
$ 3,000.00
6,000.00
$ 2,700.00
5,400.00
A31
8 -13
Adjust Monument Case and Cover
2
EA
$ 400.00
800.00
$ 300.00
600.00
$ 450.00
900.00
$ 300.00
600.00
$ 650.00
1,300.00
$ 350.00
700.00
TRAFFIC SIGNALS (SCHEDULE A)
A32
8 -20
Traffic Signal Vehicle Detection Loops Modifications at the
intersection of Tukwila International Blvd. & S 112th Street
1
LS
$ 5,506.00
5,500.00
$ 5,100.00
5,100 00
$ 5,500.00
5,500 00
$ 4,500.00
4,500.00
$ 5,000 00
5,000.00
$ 5,200.00
5,200.06
SIDEWALK (SCHEDULE A)
A33
8 -14
Cement Conc. Sidewalk
140
SY
$ 45.00
6,300.00
$ 62.00
8,680.00
$ 70.00
9,800.00
$ 41.00
5,740.00
$ 49.00
6,860.00
$ 65.00
9,100.00
A34
8 -14
Cement Conc. Curb Ramp Type Parallel A
3
EA
$ 1,500.00
4,500.00
$ 1,750.00
5,250.00
$ 1,500.00
4,500.00
$ 1,100.00
3,300.00
$ 1,200.00
3,600.00
$ 1,800.00
5,400.00
A35
8 -14
Cement Conc. Curb Ramp Type Parallel B
3
EA
$ 1,500.00
4,500.00
$ 1,750.00
5,250.00
$ 1,500.00
4,500.00
$ 1,100.00
3,300.00
$ 1,200.00
3,600.00
$ 1,800.00
5,400.00
A36
8 -14
Cement Conc. Curb Ramp Type Single Direction A Modified
1
EA
$ 1,500.00
1,500.00
$ 1,935.00
1,935.00
$ 1,750.00
1,750.00
$ 1,100.00
1,100.00
$ 1,200.00
1,200.00
$ 2,000.00
2,000.00
A37
8 -15
Cement Conc. Curb Ramp Type Perpendicular A
1
EA
$ 1,500.00
1,500.00
$ 1,935.00
1,935.00
$ 1,550.00
1,550.00
$ 1,000.00
1,000.00
$ 1,200.00
1,200.00
$ 2,000.00
2,000.00
STORM SEWER (SCHEDULE A)
A38
7 -04
Ductile Iron Storm Sewer Pipe, 12 in. Diam
90
LF
$ 70.00
6,300.00
$ 100.00
9,000.00
$ 86.00
7,740.00
$ 70.00
6,300.00
$ 110.00
9,900.00
$ 250.00
22,500.00
A39
7 -05
Catch Basin Type 1
3
EA
$ 1,500.00
4,500.00
$ 2,000.00
6,000.00
$ 1,750.00
5,250.00
$ 1,200.00
3,600.00
$ 1,200.00
3,600.00
$ 2,500.00
7,500.00
A40
7 -05
Adjust Catch Basin
31
EA
$ 450.00
13,950.00
$ 400.00
12,400.00
$ 550.00
17,050.00
$ 400.00
12,400.00
$ 800.00
24,800.00
$ 450.00
13,950.00
A41
7 -05
Storm Drain Marker
32
EA
$ 50.00
1,600.00
$ 15.00
480.00
$ 60.00
1,920.00
$ 15.00
480.00
$ 50.00
1,600.00
$ 35.00
1,120.00
SANITARY SEWER (SCHEDULE A)
A42 7 -05 (Adjust Manhole
11 EA
$ 650.00 7,150.00
$ 400.00 4,400.00
$ 550.00 6,050.00
$ 400.00 4,400.00
$ 850.00 9,350.00
$ 450.00 4,950.00
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
2014 Overlay Program
Bid Tabulation
May 28, 2014
Corrected math error
art 71 I .t 1, 1\
A
Engineer's Estimate
Miles Resources, LLC
ICON Materials
Lakeside Industries
Road Construction NW
Watson Asphalt
No. Spec Item Quantity Unit
Unit Cost Total Cost
Unit Cost Total Cost
Unit Cost Total Cost
Unit Cost Total Cost
Unit Cost Total Cost
Unit Cost Total Cost
TRAF. CNTRL. DEVICES (SCHEDULE A)
A43
8 -09
Raised Pavement Marker Type 1
11
HUND
$ 160.00
1,760.00
$ 150.00
1,650.00
$ 350.00
3,850.00
$ 147.00
1,617.00
$ 250.00
2,750.00
$ 314.00
3,454.00
A44
8 -09
Raised Pavement Marker Type 2
3
HUND
$ 375.00
1,125.00
$ 400.00
1,200.00
$ 550.00
1,650.00
$ 370.00
1,110.00
$ 450.00
1,350.00
$ 450.00
1,350.00
A45
8 -21
Permanent Signing
1
LS
$ 7,000.00
7,000.00
$ 300.00
300.00
$ 2,000.00
2,000.00
$ 1,000.00
1,000.00
$ 1,100.00
1,100.00
$ 500.00
500.00
A46
8 -22
Plastic Traffic Arrow
2
EA
$ 100.00
200.00
$ 50.00
100.00
$ 300.00
600.00
$ 50.00
100.00
$ 165.00
330.00
$ 250.00
500.00
A47
8 -22
Plastic Stop Line
140
LF
$ 10.00
1,400.00
$ 6.00
840.00
$ 12.00
1,680.00
$ 5.70
798.00
$ 6.50
910.00
$ 10.00
1,400.00
A48
8 -22
Plastic Crosswalk Line
200
SF
$ 10.00
2,000.00
$ 3.00
600.00
$ 9.00
1,800.00
$ 3.00
600.00
$ 5.00
1,000.00
$ 7.75
1,550.00
A49
8 -22
Plastic Line, 4 Inch
720
LF
$ 2.00
1,440.00
$ 2.00
1,440.00
$ 2.50
1,800.00
$ 1.57
1,130.40
$ 2.25
1,620.00
$ 2.00
1,440.00
ROADSIDE DEV. (SCHEDULE A)
A50
8 -01
Temporary Erosion Control Blanket
70
SY
$ 8.00
560.00
$ 20.00
1,400.00
$ 3.00
210.00
$ 10.00
700.00
$ 4.00
280.00
$ 20.00
1,400.00
A51
8 -02
Property Restoration
1
FA
$ 10,000.00
10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
10,000.00
A52
8 -02
Topsoil Type A
30
CY
$ 50.00
1,500.00
$ 40.00
1,200.00
$ 60.00
1,800.00
$ 50.00
1,500.00
$ 48.00
1,440.00
$ 80.00
2,400.00
A53
8 -02
Seeded Lawn Installation
80
SY
$ 1.00
80.00
$ 12.50
1,000.00
$ 6.00
480.00
$ 25.00
2,000.00
$ 3.00
240.00
$ 10.00
800.00
A54
8 -02
Edge Restoration
7,780
LF
$ 2.00
15,560.00
$ 0.25
1,945.00
$ 2.00
15,560.00
$ 2.00
15,560.00
$ 3.00
23,340.00
$ 2.50
19,450.00
A55
8 -02
PSIPE Cotoneaster salicifolius 'Repens'; 1 Gal. Cont, 36" o.c.
50
EA
$ 15.00
750.00
$ 51.00
2,550.00
$ 85.00
4,250.00
$ 100.00
5,000.00
$ 17.00
850.00
$ 50.00
2,500.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST (SCHEDULE A) 971,350.00
891,722.00
906,390.00
992,492.90
1,090,525.00
1,131,600.00
ROADWAY (SCHEDULE B)
B1
1 -04
Minor Change
1
FA
$ 3,000.00
3,000.00
$ 3,000.00
3,000.00
$ 3,000.00
3,000.00
$ 3,000.00
3,000.00
$ 3,000.00
3,000.00
$ 3,000.00
3,000.00
B2
1 -07
SPCC Plan
1
LS
$ 1,500.00
1,500.00
$ 250.00
250.00
$ 800.00
800.00
$ 500.00
500.00
$ 200.00
200.00
$ 250.00
250.00
B3
1 -09
Mobilization
1
LS
$ 15,000.00
15,000.00
$ 17,500.00
17,500.00
$ 24,000.00
24,000.00
$ 20,000.00
20,000.00
$ 31,000.00
31,000.00
$ 14,800.00
14,800.00
B4
1 -10
Project Temporary Traffic Control
1
LS
$ 8,000.00
8,000.00
$ 4,500.00
4,500.00
$ 10,000.00
10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
10,000.00
$ 15,500.00
15,500.00
$ 21,300.00
21,300.00
B5
2 -02
Asphalt Pavement Removal Incl. Haul
180
SY
$ 40.00
7,200.00
$ 15.00
2,700.00
$ 11.00
1,980.00
$ 20.00
3,600.00
$ 18.00
3,240.00
$ 50.00
9,000.00
B6
2 -02
Cement Conc. Sidewalk Removal Incl. Haul
20
SY
$ 25.00
500.00
$ 32.50
650.00
$ 30.00
600.00
$ 50.00
1,000.00
$ 22.00
440.00
$ 50.00
1,000.00
B7
2 -02
Cement Conc. Curb Removal Incl. Haul
290
LF
$ 10.00
2,900.00
$ 8.30
2,407.00
$ 8.00
2,320.00
$ 20.00
5,800.00
$ 7.00
2,030.00
$ 25.00
7,250.00
B8
2 -02
Removal of Structure and Obstruction
1
LS
$ 3,000.00
3,000.00
$ 300.00
300.00
$ 5,000.00
5,000.00
$ 5,000.00
5,000.00
$ 2,500.00
2,500.00
$ 10,200.00
10,200.00
B9
2 -03
Unsuitable Foundation Excavation Incl. Haul
50
CY
$ 50.00
2,500.00
$ 20.00
1,000.00
$ 60.00
3,000.00
$ 50.00
2,500.00
$ 50.00
2,500.00
$ 60.00
3,000.00
B10
2 -03
Gravel Borrow Incl. Haul
100
TON
$ 25.00
2,500.00
$ 10.00
1,000.00
$ 35.00
3,500.00
$ 10.00
1,000.00
$ 24.00
2,400.00
$ 23.80
2,380.00
B11
4 -04
Crushed Surfacing Top Course
810
TON
$ 30.00
24,300.00
$ 30.00
24,300.00
$ 40.00
32,400.00
$ 10.00
8,100.00
$ 35.00
28,350.00
$ 23.80
19,278.00
B12
5 -04
Pavement Repair Excavation Incl. Haul
870
CY
$ 55.00
47,850.00
$ 32.00
27,840.00
$ 55.00
47,850.00
$ 29.00
25,230.00
$ 49.00
42,630.00
$ 52.10
45,327.00
B13
5 -04
HMA for Pavement Repair Cl. 1/2" PG 64 -22
940
TON
$ 95.00
89,300.00
$ 85.00
79,900.00
$ 96.00
90,240.00
$ 77.00
72,380.00
$ 92.00
86,480.00
$ 135.60
127,464.00
B14
8 -01
Erosion/Water Pollution Control
1
FA
$ 2,500.00
2,500.00
$ 2,500.00
2,500.00
$ 2,500.00
2,500.00
$ 2,500.00
2,500.00
$ 2,500.00
2,500.00
$ 2,500.00
2,500.00
B15
8 -01
Inlet Protection
6
EA
$ 75.00
450.00
$ 70.00
420.00
$ 75.00
450.00
$ 75.00
450.00
$ 75.00
450.00
$ 50.00
300.00
B16
8 -04
Cement Conc. Traffic Curb and Gutter
80
LF
$ 35.00
2,800.00
$ 19.25
1,540.00
$ 35.00
2,800.00
$ 25.00
2,000.00
$ 30.00
2,400.00
$ 20.00
1,600.00
B17
8 -04
Extruded Curb
180
LF
$ 10.00
1,800.00
$ 7.00
1,260.00
$ 9.00
1,620.00
$ 6.25
1,125.00
$ 10.00
1,800.00
$ 8.00
1,440.00
SIDEWALK (SCHEDULE B)
B18 8 -14 Cement Conc. Sidewalk
20 SY
$ 45.00 900.00
$ 62.00 1,240.00
$ 82.00 1,640.00
$ 58.00 1,160.00
$ 68.00 1,360.00
$ 65.00 1,300.00
STORM SEWER (SCHEDULE B)
B19 7 -05 Adjust Catch Basin
6 EA
$ 450.00 I 2,700.00
$ 400.00 I 2,400.00
$ 550.00 3,300.00
$ 400.00 2,400.00
$ 750.00 4,500.00
$ 450.00 I 2,700.00
TRAF. CNTRL. DEVICES (SCHEDULE B)
B20
8 -21
Permanent Signing
1
LS
$ 1,000.00
1,000.00
$ 1.00
1.00
$ 750.00
750.00
$ 500.00
500.00
$ 1,000.00
1,000.00
$ 500.00
500.00
B21
8 -22
Plastic Traffic Arrow
2
EA
$ 100.00
200.00
$ 50.00
100.00
$ 300.00
600.00
$ 50.00
100.00
$ 165.00
330.00
$ 234.00
468.00
B22
8 -22
Paint Line, 4 Inch
440
LF
$ 2.00
880.00
$ 0.60
264.00
$ 5.00
2,200.00
$ 0.57
250.80
$ 2.25
990.00
$ 4.00
1,760.00
ROADSIDE DEV. (SCHEDULE B)
B23 I 8 -02 !Property Restoration
1 I FA
$ 3,000.00 I 3,000.00
$ 3,000.00 I 3,000.00
$ 3,000.00 I 3,000.00
$ 3,000.00 I 3,000.00
$ 3,000.00 I 3,000.00
$ 3,000.00 I 3,000.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST (SCHEDULE B) 223,780.00
178,072.00
243,550.00
171,595.80
238,600.00
279,817.00
TOTAL BID (SCHEDULE A+ B) 1,195,130.00
1,069,794.00
1,149,940.00
1,164,088.70
1,329,125.00
1,411,417.00
A
753 " AvenuP North
Seattle, WA 981C19
P. 206,286.1640
F: 2061861639
/w.kpg,corn
January 22, 201.4
Mr. David Sorensen
Project Manager
City of Tukwila, Department of Public Works
6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100
Tukwila, WA 98188
RE: East Marginal Way South (S 81st P1 to S Norfolk St)
Project No. 91210406
Recommendation for Contract Award
Dear David,
As requested, KPG has tabulated the bids and reviewed the bid packages submitted for the East
Marginal Way South (S 8151 P1 to S Norfolk St) project. The lowest bidder in the amount of
$1,738,991.50 is Miles Resources, LLC.
References listed in the Completed Construction Project Reference List provided by Miles
Resources, LLC in their bid package confirmed that recently completed contracts with the
contractor on similar roadway overlay projects were successful.
We checked the status of Miles Resources LLC on the Washington State Labor and Industries web
page to confirm they are currently licensed. We also checked the online System for Award
Management and Miles Resources LLC does not have any active exclusion records listed.
It is KPG's recommendation that the East Marginal Way South (S 81st P1 to S Norfolk St) project be
awarded to Miles Resources LLC pending an independent review and recommendation by WSDOT.
The hid tabulation is enclosed.
Sincerely,
KPG, Inc.
v La.
Josh Fedora, P.E.
Enclosures: Bid Tabulation
15
16
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
BY: Dave Sorensen, Project Manager
DATE: June 6, 2014
SUBJECT: Tukwila Manufacturing /Industrial Center (MIC) Smart Street Non - Motorized Project
Project No. 91310406
Acceptance of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Grant
ISSUE
Accept a Federal grant awarded by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) to construct bicycle facilities on East
Marginal Way South, Boeing Access Road, and Airport Way South in the amount of $482,047.00.
BACKGROUND
In May 2012 the City submitted an application to PSRC in response to a statewide Call for Projects to award Federal grant
funds. The City's application had two parts requesting Congestion Management/Air Quality (CMAQ) funds for the design
phase which includes bicycle facilities on the corridor of East Marginal Way S /Boeing Access Rd /Airport Way S from SR 599
to the north City limits and a request for funds for the construction phase. PSRC did not fund the construction phase initially,
however in October of 2013 PSRC approved the construction grant funding as a separate act. The City was awarded the
amount of $482,047 to construct the project.
DISCUSSION
Acceptance of the awarded Federal grant will enable the City to proceed with construction phase of the Tukwila MIC Smart
Street Non - Motorized Project.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The total estimated project cost for bicycle facilities, including construction, submitted with the initial grant application was
$678,480.00. A city match of 13.5% is required for this project.
Construction
Tukwila MIC Smart Street Non - Motorized Project PSRC Grant $482,047.00
City Match from 2013 Annual Overlay & Repair 75,233.00
Total $557,280.00
RECOMMENDATION
Council is being asked to accept a Federal grant awarded by PSRC in the amount of $482,047.00 for the Tukwila MIC Smart
Street Non - Motorized Project and consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the June 16, 2014 Regular Meeting.
Attachments: 2014 CIP, page 26
Award Letter from PSRC
Vicinity Map
W:1PW EngIPROJECTSIA- RW & RS Projects\Tukwila MIC Smart Street Non - Motorized Project (91310406)IDesign\WSDOT CN Auth LM DocsICN Auth Request\Docs To TCIWorking DocstInfo Memo Grant Accept 06- 21- 13.docx
17
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2014 to 2019
PROJECT: Tukwila MIC Smart Street Non - Motorized Project Project No. 91310406
DESCRIPTION: Design and construct bicycle lanes /facilities on the corridor of East Marginal Way S (Tuk Intl Blvd
to Boeing Access Rd) and Airport Way (BAR to NCL). Manufacturing /Industrial Center (MIC).
JUSTIFICATION: Non - motorized improvements are desired throughout the City to reduce traffic congestion and offer
alternative modes of travel.
STATUS: New project for the 2014 - 2019 CIP.
MAINT. IMPACT: Minimal impact, additional pavement markings and minor asphalt widening to maintain.
COMMENT: A federal CMAQ grant has been awarded for $104,838 in design funds and $482,047 for construction.
FINANCIAL Through Estimated
(in $000's)
2012 2013 2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
BEYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Design
58
64
122
Land (RJW)
0
Const. Mgmt.
58
58
Construction
500
500
TOTAL EXPENSES
0
58
622
0
0
0
0
0
0
680
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant
50
537
587
Proposed Grant
0
Mitigation Actual
0
Traffic Impact Fees
0
City Oper. Revenue
0
8
85
0
0
0
0
0
0
93
TOTAL SOURCES
0
58
622
0
0
0
0
0
0
680
2014 - 2019 Capital Improvement Program
26
18
1C1
October 30th 2013
The Honorable Jim Haggerton, Mayor
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Blvd
Tukwila, WA 98188
Dear Mayor Haggerton:
On behalf of the Puget Sound Regional Council, congratulations on the selection of the Tukwila
Manufacturing Industrial Center "Smart Street" Non Motorized Project to receive $482,047 in
federal transportation funding.
This project was on a prioritized contingency list of projects that are eligible to receive additional
funding that becomes available before the next selection process. Funding recently became
available through PSRC's project tracking program, and your project was next on the list to
receive these funds.
PSRC's project selection process is rigorous and helps identify the highest priority projects that
will improve local and regional mobility and help achieve our long -range regional transportation
plan, Transportation 2040. Final approval by the Governor and federal funding agencies is
expected in early 2014.
Thank you for your leadership and for the excellent work by your staff to help the region achieve a
better transportation system that gets people and goods where they need to go, provides
transportation choices, and helps support a strong economy in the region. We look forward to
continuing to partner with you in the future.
Warm regards,
Bob Drewel
Executive Director
Puget Sound Regional Council
CC:
Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
Robin Tischmak, City Engineer
19
Project
Location
S
Rainier
Golf &
Country
Club
High line
specialty
Center
Foster
Golf
Course
City of Tu
<wila
TUKWILA MIC CENTER SMART
STREET NON-MOTORIZED PROJECT
June 17, 2013
Vicinity
Map
20
TO:
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
DATE: June 6, 2014
SUBJECT: King County Metro Transit Updates
ISSUE
Discuss status of King County Metro (KCM) Transit leased Park - and -Ride Lot on Interurban
Ave S and proposed transit service cuts.
BACKGROUND
KCM owns the large Park - and -Ride Lot on Interurban Ave S. For the last twenty years, KCM
has also leased the small vacant parcel at the southwest corner of 52nd Ave S as an auxiliary
parking lot to the adjacent large Park - and -Ride Lot. The lease for the small parking lot was
terminated effective January 31, 2014 and 41 parking spaces were lost. The City has received
a small amount of complaints regarding the closure of the small lot and current usage of the
large lot.
In an April 24th press release, KCM announced transit service cuts of 16 percent as a result of
the failure of Proposition 1 at the ballot. The KCM website shows 72 bus routes slated for
deletion and 84 routes for reduced or revised hours. The attached May 27th email regarding
Community Mobility Contracts from Victor Obeso, KCM Service Development Manager,
includes a list of 5 unchanged routes, 4 deleted routes and 4 revised routes. Under this
proposed service restoration framework, KCM is willing to consider service hour restoration if
local jurisdictions partner to purchase transit service hours. KCM is currently developing the
service restoration cost model. Once the costs are known, they will be brought back to
committee for discussion.
ANALYSIS
KCM is still looking for a suitable replacement auxiliary Park - and -Ride Lot. In the meantime,
KCM is patrolling the lot to make sure vehicle usage is not in violation of the KCM usage
guidelines. Complaints have included oversize and overweight vehicles taking up multiple
spots and use by carpools. KCM does not have a program to issue or track parking stickers to
ensure locals have first rights to a Park - and -Ride lot.
RECOMMENDATION
For information only.
Attachments: May 27th E -mail to Victor Obeso
Service Reduction Worksheet
w:1pw englotherlbob gibersonlcorrespondencelinfo memo kcm updates june 2014.docx
21
From: Obeso, Victor [mailto:Victor.Obeso @kingcounty.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 5:48 PM
To: Bob Giberson
Cc: Carlson, Diane; Desmond, Kevin; Lorenzana, Candida
Subject: FW: Community Mobility Contract - Tukwila
Dear Mr. Giberson:
King County Metro is currently putting together a framework for the Community Mobility Contracts, King
County Executive Dow Constantine's recent proposal to enable local jurisdictions to purchase transit
service. The Community Mobility Contracts program is based on three principles:
• Contracts must reflect the full cost of providing service.
• Contracts cannot come at the expense of other cities or the regional allocation of service.
• The program is intended as a bridge to keep buses on the street until the state legislature
provides a sustainable funding tool for local transportation needs.
Through Community Mobility Contracts, one or more jurisdictions can purchase transit service that
operates within or through their respective areas to avoid proposed service reductions or to respond to
other service needs. Metro staff is beginning to outline the process for service requests including
contract development, approval, implementation, performance evaluation and termination. More
information will be available later this month.
Attached please find a resource sheet that details the service reduction proposal for your jurisdiction.
This may be helpful in beginning to think about potential investments that may be included in the
Community Mobility Contracts program.
In addition, Metro is also beginning to evaluate the costs for contracting service. The cost to restore
transit service on any particular route depends on several factors and each contract will be evaluated
individually. Metro is developing a cost model that considers the following factors:
• Hours of service (number of operating hours and whether service is peak -only or all -day)
• Miles traveled
• Vehicle type (Metro operates primarily 40 -and 60 -foot long diesel hybrid and electric trolley
buses)
• Bus fleet use or financing costs
Metro is designing this model to be transparent and provide clarity in costs associated with purchasing
transit service directly.
We will provide more information on the process and cost model for Community Mobility Contracts as it
is developed. Thank you again for your interest in this new program and we look forward to future
discussions on potential transit service investments with your jurisdiction.
If you have further questions or comments, please contact Candida Lorenzana, Transportation Planner,
at 206 - 477 -5862 or via email at candida .lorenzana(a�kingcounty.gov.
Sincerely,
Victor Obeso
Manager, Service Development
Metro Transit Division
cc: Kevin Desmond, General Manager, Metro Transit Division, Department of Transportation (DOT),
Diane Carlson, Director of Regional Initiatives, Office of the King County Executive, Candida
Lorenzana, Transportation Planner, Strategic Planning and Analysis, Service Development, Metro
Transit Division, DOT
22
Tukwila
Swing W. Wreskola_ Routes.. DO DOH serve
Top 25
*Spring 2019 Thresholds- Routes matserve Sea u^/
Top 25
Peak
Off
WRIR
241 ] 4
245 ] 9
188 6
Pak
0 Pe
46 7 24
ht
43 1fi6
513 154
349 108
An /light hatled field isa ri kfactor
Peak
Off ueak
Night
Curd °'
Target Servise Family
Peak Gretna
Co rdor St ms
Red coon P Ority
Spring 2013 Annual Hours
Spring 2013 Annual Rtles
Route 2014 Brute Bescriot on
Rides' Pass./
PlatHr Flat%
Hikes/ PassIvId
PlatHr Plat.
PlatHr Plat%
Time Rltlership
Off
Peak Peak Night
Off
Peak Feak Nioht
Peak O1 Peak tight Total
Peek Off Peak Night Total
Reduction P-opocal Summary
R n
enon Phase
Change In Hours
Peak Off Peak Night Total
Summary of Changes
Proposed Freque wa. Span
PI °pose, end
Tu..- Georgetown - Seattle COP
35 3
12 5
37 7
23 9
Very Frequent
B elow
Below
P erused
SOkthcenter- Westwo0] Village- Atlmia) Dis[hct
33 8
109
354
120
Very Frequent
Below
Below
14,487
46 ,321
4894]8
713,706
200,701
1,403,885
Revised
Sep-I5
4,636
4,632
Extend service to Allai In West Seattle.
Revise'ouorg to use 12th Avenue SW,
SW Genesee Street SW Alaka Street.
Caummia Avenue SW a. SW Atlmia
Street he.een South Seattle Community
Ccuegeand Alla
perate scrvice more often int p k
p
20
30
30
30
30
3efore 1200 AM
140
Bu len TC- Renton TC
299
99
339
28 8
83
Very Frequent
Below
At
Below
1]930
fit]
35,729
416,822
571,723
133,344
1,121 889
Unchanged
WP
i 014
H owe p e y eF the
30
30
30
3efore 10.00 PM
40 0
20 4
39 8
Very Frequent
B elow
At
27 818
I 107 882
284 351
Unchanged
NrA
Urchanged
154
Tukwila StaOOn- Eoeino Intlufial
184
53
Peak
Peat
Yes
Peak
Peak
Peak
2,259
2.59
41,565
41,565
Deleted
Sep-I5
-2 25C
-2,259
Delete
Sokmcenter- Searac Aimoh- HIghlme CC
4s
155
100
Frequent
Below
At
Below
8,567
9,419
21,583
129,795
145,965
37,578
313,338
P erused
µt5
-3,014
-3,014
Operate service lea peen during the
midday
E. service earlier.
30
60
60
60
60
Befo'e ]. CO PM
10 7
Peak
Feieal Way TC- Fetleal Center South
59
Peak
Peat
Yes
'e1
Peak
Peak
Peak
101 774
101 774
Peleted
RAW
Pelete
Peak
Peak
Peak
1,483
1,483
17,850
17,850
Deleted
Sep-I4
-1 48:
-1,483
Delete
Seattle OPP - Bellevue- Renton
10 0
Wyl
Deleted
Delete
193.*
Feieal way- Firs HuI
24
2
Peak
Peat
Yes
Yet
Peak
Peak
Peak
fi 992
fi E92
1]2890
1]2,890
P erused
Feb-I5
north part of tlownmwr
Seattle o O▪ r ert0 provide amioonal
sew apaRty
201E0
Seattle CBD -Group Health (Tukwila)
34
Peak
Peat
Yes
Yet
Peak
Peak
Peak
1,280
1380
11,209
11,609
Unchanged
WP
Urchanged
tine
Feieal Way- Tukwila
491
135
54 2
17
39 4
32
Very Frequent
At
Below
21 274
",5434
15 699
62 407
1 845 500
1 379 439
617 93]
3 042 8]5
Unchanged
WP
Urchanged
15 -39
Befo'e 3'. CO AM
06OAR
Fa mood - Seuthcenter
184
58
193
101
Local
Below
Below
9]9
3,580
fi 559
54,825
69,024
123,849
Unchanged
WP
Urchanged
60
60
60
Befo'e 8'. CO PM
24
Transportation Committee Goals /Work Item Ideas:
Transportation 2nd and 4th Monday -5:15 p.m.
Allan Ekberg, Chair
Dennis Robertson
Kate Kruller
Priority
Item
2013/2014 Priority Area
Comment
Status
Due April
Apprentice procedure / process
Per resolution
COMPLETE 3/17/14 - Council approved apprenticeship
guidelines
Review and prioritization of
residential affected street projects
(Consider East /West corridors —
152nd, 130th — prioritization of
what's next along with funding
discussion on residential streets
that don't get grants or awards
causing delay.)
"Updated Plans and
Policies Aligned with the
Community Vision"
42 Phase III design 2014
/ construction 2015 (CIP)
53rd design 2015/16;
construction 2016/17
(CIP)
2/24/14 - Committee reviewed the existing residential
street rating matrix (c. 1990s). Chair Ekberg asked for
information on existing tools that may exist to
accomplish this.
Better /Safer Crosswalks on TIB
"An Improved
Environment for
Community Livability"
ADA Improvements 2014
(CIP)
2/10/14 - Along with ADA improvements in the CIP, staff
reported that Tukwila Village developers are also part of
the dialogue regarding safer crosswalks on Tukwila
International Boulevard, and frontage improvements
factor into negotiations
144th and 42nd - Foster HS corner
Stop Light (prioritization of this
citizens request)
"An Improved
Environment for
Community Livability"
S 144th St Phase II (42
Ave S —TIB); design
update 2014; construct
2015 (CIP)
4/28/14: Staff reported at Committee that consultant
selection is currently in progress to begin the design
work, with construction expected in 2015.
Replacement of amber lights to
white lights (led replacement) on
International BLVD.
"Crime Reduction on TIB"
What will it take?
2/10/14 - Committee members asked for a 2015 budget
initiative for LED replacement bulbs for the 125
pedestrian lights along Tukwila International Boulevard,
estimated to cost $241,000.
Traffic Cameras Policy (Use
thereof)
Discussion on their
effectiveness, purpose;
need...
2/10/14 - Staff agreed to return with a map of red -light
related accident locations as well as a primer on photo
enforcement legalities.
Walking tour of transportation
related facilities
For general facility
insights
The Committee is interested in touring transportation
related facilities, and staff will return with a list of ideas
for discussion.
26
DRAFT
June , 2014
Governor Jay Inslee
Office of the Governor
PO Box 40002
Olympia, WA 98504 -0002
Dear Governor Inslee:
We are contacting you to express our deep concerns about oil train safety in our region. The
South King County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd) is a collaborative effort of sixteen
cities in South King County, King and Pierce counties, the ports of Seattle and Tacoma, the
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and transportation agencies committed to improving our region's
transportation system. We have both BNSF & UP tracks running through many our South King
County cities. When one takes into account both passenger rail, commuter rail and freight traffic
uses this rail system, one can understand SCATBd's safety concerns about the possibility of
increased oil train traffic operating through our region
We provided comments about the State Rail Plan in the attached November 26, 2013 letter. As
one of the most active freight areas in the nation, we have concerns about the impacts from
increases in rail traffic. The letter outlined many of these concerns, but it was primarily focused
on economic development and overall safety. We now urgently request that you direct attention
to an immediate overhaul of the State's capability to respond to potential disasters, such as oil
trains and other hazardous materials that are transported through our cities.
Like most jurisdictions across the country, we took note of the July 6, 2013 oil train derailment
in Lac- Megantic, Quebec. With 47 lives lost in that horrible accident, we compared what might
happen in several of our cities if a similar accident took place in our region. According to BNSF
presentations, there are one and one half trains of up to 170 tanker oil cars transiting our cities on
a daily basis. We believe that a catastrophic train accident will result in a loss of life that could
easily be in the many hundreds with residual health problems created for potentially thousands.
With the May 7, 2014 USDOT Emergency Order requiring all railroads operating trains
containing large amounts of Bakken crude oil to notify State Emergency Response Commissions
(SERCs), increased volumes of oil produced, and the operation of these trains through the United
States, we believe it is appropriate for you as Governor, to take action with the federal
government before an incident occurs along our cities corridors. We suggest that you organize a
Summit of all Emergency First Responders and Planners throughout the State to develop an
active and sustainable emergency response plan to both help prevent, but also respond to such
disasters. There are a limited number of local first responders able to take on a similar disaster
without significant help.
27
We have recently met with BNSF representatives and are aware that they have their own
emergency responders and do significant training of first responders around the State of
Washington. They are certainly part of the important factor in any oil train accident response,
however, we know that any response to an oil train accident will also require a coordinated
response of state and local agencies. Such a response has to be carefully planned and practiced in
advance.
In conclusion, we believe a major effort directed and coordinated by your office on oil train
accident response is needed or it will not get the attention and funding that is required for the
safety of people and property along the railways in our region. We must do all we can to prevent
a Lac- Megantic -scale disaster from happening here!
Thank you for your consideration and action.
Sincerely,
Marcie Palmer, Chair Bill Peloza, Vice -Chair
Councilmember, City of Renton Councilmember, City of Auburn
South County Area Transportation Board
Enclosure:
State Rail Plan Comment Letter dated November 26, 2013
cc: SCATBd members
Senator Mark Mullet
Rep. Jay Rodne
Rep. Chad Magendanz
Senator Bob Hasegawa
Rep. Zack Hudgins
Rep. Steve Bergquist
Senator Tracey Eide
Rep. Linda Kochmar
Rep. Roger Freeman
Senator Pam Roach
Rep. Cathy Dahlquist
Rep. Christopher Hurst
Senator Karen Keiser
Rep. Tina Orwall
Rep. Dave Upthegrove
28
Senator Sharon Nelson
Rep. Eileen Cody
Rep. Joe Fitzgibbon
Senator Adam Kline
Rep. Sharon Tomiko Santos
Rep. Eric Pettigrew
Senator Steve Litzow
Rep. Tana Senn
Rep. Judy Clibborn
Senator Joe Fain
Rep. Mark Hargrove
Rep. Pat Sullivan
King County Councilmembers
KC Executive
Pierce County Councilmembers
PC Executive
RAMP Members
Seattle Port
Tacoma Port
MIT
29
November 26, 2013
Ron Pate, Rail Director
PO Box 47407
310 Maple Park Avenue SE
Olympia, WA 98504 -7407
Dear Mr. Pate,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Washington State Rail Plan, public review
draft. The South County Area Transportation Board (SCATBd) is a collaborative effort of local
elected officials who are committed to improving the region's transportation system. SCATBd
represents an area that encompasses 16 south King County cities including 690,000 city and
county residents, and is home to over 300,000 jobs. The south King County area also has one of
the largest manufacturing and industrial areas in the Pacific Northwest, and our area's
transportation system plays an important role in supporting the economic vitality of the region
and state through the efficient movement of people and goods. The State's two Class 1 rail lines
run through the south King County area.
Local Transportation Funding Short -Falls
The draft plan forecasts increasing demand for passenger and freight rail services in Washington
State, and an increase in rail traffic will affect traffic delay and safety at at -grade crossings in our
valley cities. Table D1 of the draft plan lists a number of partially funded and unfunded grade
separation projects in the south King County area. However, because of mounting funding
shortfalls, SCATBd jurisdictions are unable to fund these needed grade separation projects.
SCATBd members recommend the draft plan highlight the local agency funding shortfalls for
these grade separation projects and the impacts of not building these grade separation projects on
the movement of people and freight. In order to continue and facilitate state -level revenue and
funding discussions, we need to acknowledge our local funding shortfalls in our various local
and state transportation planning documents such as the Washington State Rail Plan and the
Washington State Freight Mobility Plan.
At -Grade Crossings Transportation Impacts to Local Communities
One of the themes that emerged from the draft Washington State Rail Plan stakeholders outreach
efforts included community impacts of rail. Stakeholders identified the need to address traffic
congestion and safety at at -grade crossings, and to evaluate opportunities for freight and
passenger rail to contribute to local economic development. The draft rail plan section entitled
"Challenges and Other Issues Facing Class 1 Rail Roads, Relationships Between Communities
and Class I Railroads (page 46)" should be expanded to include a more in -depth analysis on the
impacts of freight rail and passenger rail traffic at at -grade crossings. The analysis should include
a focus on the impacts of freight and passenger rail operations on surface movement of people
30
and freight at at -grade crossings. The analysis should also include the economic and social
impacts of travel delays experienced by travel of emergency vehicles, truck freight traffic,
passenger vehicles and transit.
Impacts of Potential Increase in Coal and Crude Oil Train Traffic
SCATBd would also like to see an expanded discussion and analysis on the impacts of potential
coal and crude oil train traffic on the capacity for existing and future freight and passenger rail
traffic. Currently, several proposals are under consideration to enhance port capacity, including a
bulk coal export facility at Cherry Point in Whatcom County. If the Cherry Point bulk export
facility were to be developed, it could add up to 18 mile- and -a -half long trains per day. Oil
refineries in our state have typically received crude oil shipments from Alaska and elsewhere by
ship, barges or pipelines, but refiners are increasingly turning to trains to take advantage of a
boom in oil from North Dakota's Bakken region. This potential increase in coal and crude oil
trail traffic could result in significant impacts to both current and future freight and passenger
train traffic in our state, including our region's Sounder Commuter Rail Service.
This potential increase in coal and crude oil train traffic is a major concern for SCATBd
members because of the possible impacts to south King County cities, our regional and statewide
economy. Our region's economy relies on the rail corridor to move parts and finished products
and an increase in coal and crude oil train traffic could impact existing and future rail- dependent
economic development. This increase in coal and crude oil train traffic would also have
significant impacts at at -grade crossings, impacting the flow of freight and goods flowing to and
from our ports to the industrial and warehousing areas in the Green River Valley area.
SCATBd supports the draft rail plan's vision that is guided by the six transportation system
policy goals established by the state legislature which includes: economic vitality, preservation,
safety, mobility, environment, and stewardship. SCATBd members are keenly aware of the
economic importance of Washington's freight and passenger rail system and the key role it plays
in the multimodal transportation system that keeps people, freight and goods moving in
Washington State. Our local transportation systems also provide an important foundation for
Washington's economy. It provides the vital connections that link our homes to our work places
and carry products to market.
Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft Washington State Rail Plan and if
you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Pete Lewis Marcie Palmer
Chair Vice Chair
South County Area Transportation Board
31