Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit 4324 - MA Segale - Fletchers Meat - Reroof
CITY OF TUKWILA l_ - � Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1845 Work to be done Site Address Building Use Property Owner Address Contractor Address Reroof BUILDING PERMIT PERMIT # 4341- Control # 86 -155 13338 Andover Pk W e Warehouse /Office M. A. Segale P.O. Box 88050 Besco Roofing, Inc. 233 South Holden Suite # Tenant Fletchers Meat Assessors Account # Phone # 575 -3200 Zip 98188 PE-Fe . 763 -4705 Zip 98108 Tukwila, WA #BESCORI -155M5 Se&t e . WA FOR BUILDING PERM4KONLYiller 763 -4705) annrovpd far iccuanra by %��l � Sq. Ti t—FT. Warehouse Retail Other Da. Load 2nd F1. 3rd Fl. -Tot a1 Fire Protection: 0 Sprinklers C1 Detectors Zoning Type of Construction Special Conditions Fees sq. ft. @ 1st F1. $ sq. ft. @ 2nd F1. $ sq. ft. @ other $ sq. ft. @ other $ Total Valuation of Construction $ 21,000.00 Bldg. Permit Fee Plan Check Fee Demolition Surcharges Other Other TOTAL Receipt #1394 $ 147.00 Receipt #1394 $ 966.9' Receipt # $ Receipt #1394 $ 1.50 Receipt # $ Receipt # $ $ FOR SIGN PERMIT ONLY 0 Permanent ['Temporary [] Single Face J Double Face 0 Wall Mounted 0 Free Standing 0 Other Building face Setbacks: Front Side Side Rear Square Footage of each sign face Special Conditions Total square footage of sign THIS PERMIT BFCUMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 18O DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK l5 COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL B COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CEL THE P . J1NS OF ANY �TpHE�R �STATE, AR LOCAL LAW p REGULATING CONST CTIO OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. S Ignedl ,,e-An- /1/1 Fy '""�' IJ., i� Jn�C Date S / CD �4' ������JJJJJJ LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION I hereby affirm that 1 am licens d under provisi s t!+e: Business �and� Prof sions Cod �,aed my license is in full farce and effect. Contractor (signature) _.4...- /" ✓7 —2—. !,)"^4"1 a ` 86. OWNER- BUILDER DECLARATION ( ) 1, as owner of the property, or my employees, with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. ( ) I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractor's to construct the project. Date Owner (signature) LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE E, SELIKOFF 1903 Pacific Building Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 622 -7205 Facsimile (206) 343 -3917 VIA :FAX and U.S. MAIL July 29, 1991 City Attorney, Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Attn: Michael Kenyon Re: Fletcher's Fine foods vs. �esco Roofing, Ijc Dear Mike: RECEIVED .JUL 2 9 1991 + :1TY OF TUKW IL'1 i 1' ATTORNEY'S oFFice The Pletcher'a roof i completed. Enclosed is the ermit. Can you have the inspect/o ?get out there ASAP to sign f on the permit. Re can sign a y copy of the permit, it 't really matter. I'm sending this to you by fax, early a.m. Monday, to give you as much lead time as possible. It would be best all around f we could wrap s up in the next couple of days. Thank you for your consideration. ery truly you s, Bruce E. Sell ff Attorney at BES:dlg enc: Permit Gl l l ;Ut-.:' 16N w "LA PLANNING OFT. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING PERMIT INSPECTION RECORD POST AT OR NEAR FRONT OF BUILDING PROTECT FROM WEATHER City of Tukwila Building Division 433-1845 JOB ADORESS 18338 Andover Pk W WORK T0' BE DONE Reroof (perciA04.s OWNER CONTRACTOR DATE ISSUED Y '�EtIVED JUL 2 3 1991 Q.P:.:fl' A oFFI�c Control it 86 -155 jiteca) Date Issued 5/16/86 M.A. Segale Besco Roofing, Inc. 5• 142-8(9 TYPE OCCUPANCY SPECIAL CONDITIONS Inspector must sign all spaces pertaining to this job. TYPE DATE INSP. NOTES Grading (81dg. 433 -1845) Ian ALf/1 Setback (bldg. 433 -1845) Rebar /Footin. /Found. (Bld•. 433 -1845) /'V Slab (Bldg. 433 -1845) gg . Grout (814. 433 -1845) AO Frame (Bldg. 433 -1845) ' 4 •.'oofin• (Bid.. 433 -1845) Insulation • , (bldg. 433 -1845) McChihical (Bldg. 433 -1845) Wall Board (Bldg. 433 -1845) Util ties WateriBewer /Drainage (Shops 433 -1860) rkinn$ + (Plnq. 433 -1845) L '- ', (Pin.. 433-1845) fir . 41 f e.:`: ' '1 41S-18501 mil NMI (Fire 433 -1859) FI ,e (Bldg. 433.1845) PRIOR T rILINAL'A.t. ITEMS PERTAINING TO THIS JOB MUST BE SIGNED -OFF BY THE 1NSPfunec • CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTE R IIOULEVARD, TUKIPILA, IVASIIINGTON 98188 PHONE a (206)133.1800 •jui,j931991 ,1(;!.1.1-/- I'ullasrn :4 / ur PLANNING DEPT. July 24, 1991 Mr., Bruce Selikoff 1908 Pacific Building Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Fletcher's Fine Foods v. Besco Roofing, Inc. Dear Bruce: I disagree with much of your letter dated July 24, 1991. I agree that your client should apply the emulsion previously agreed upon by Segale as landlord and Fletcher's as tenant. If the City's inspector approves that application, I am confident the permit will be issued. ;'Very truly yours, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Michael.R. Kenyon City ,Attorney; . MRK /cc : cc: L. Rick Beeler Duane Griffin John McFarland Laurie Pinard Jim Shaker, 4LETCUR.003 • yr C CITY OF TUICWILA 6200 SOUTIICENTER BOULEVARD, TUK{VILA, WASHINGTON 98188 July 23, 1991 PHONE # 12001 433 1800 Bruce E. Selikoff 1903 Pacific Building Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Fletcher's Fine Foods v. Besco Roofing Dear Bruce: Cunt' 1.. !•nnllusen, Map,' We have received your letter of July 22, 1991, along with the letter from Gerald Mylan of Besco Roofing, also dated July 22, indicating that the roof on the Fletcher's Fine Foods building "will meet Class B" specifications once the previously described emulsion is added. Based on those writings, together with material you have previously submitted including, but not limited to, the attachments to my letter dated April 26, 1991, I believe that the Building Official will issue a final permit after he or his inspectors have the opportunity to review the completed work. Bear in mind that this is no guarantee. Only the Building Official has the authority to issue the permit. Finally, some advice in your future dealings with the City of Tukwila. You have verbally insulted and berated the Building Official, and threatened both him and my legal assistant that you would "sue everyone in the City" if your demands were not met. I always advise my clients to be even more careful, and more deliberate, when others threaten lawsuits. The delays in resolving your lawsuit with Fletcher's and Segale were caused entirely by persons or entities other than the City of Tukwila. We have treated this roof just like any other roof in the City and, in fact, have responded quite promptly in assisting you to settle a lawsuit that you otherwise clearly would have lost. You would do well to consider these words in any future dealings you have with the City. You certainly owe the Building Official an apology. N Please contact me if you have further. questions. Very truly yours, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY —Ykaelt,e Michael R. Ks on City Attorne MRK /cc cc: L. Rick. Beeler Duane Griffin John McFarland Laurie Pinard Jim Shaker FLETCHER.002 July 22, 1991 City Attorney, Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Attn: Mike Kenyon Dear Mikes LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE E, SELIKOFF 1903 Pacific Building Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 622 -7205 Facsimile (206) 343 -3917 l'f511Frill'i';ftilliji\11, UT • JUL 231991. •CiT aF TU VViLA • l'I_AP.NING DEPT. RECEIVED JUL 2 2 1991 OITf Orit1KWILA cm ATTORNEYS p1:F14a Re: F'letcher'a Fina QQda ys. @expo Roofing. inc Your inspector tells me that he requires assurance from Besco Roofing, Inc. that the roof, as contemplated, will meet Class B specifications. Attached as Exhibit A herein is the letter so indicating. When we last spoke, the City's position was that it would accept the roof as proposed if this were acceptable to Segale. 'It has previously been communicated to you that Segal. agrees with this application. Please sign where indicated below, and indicate that the City will sign off on the permit when the application of emulsion is completed. This winds the matter up. 1 will have my client contact Pletcher's for the application time. A fecsi gn and rot ery truly tsignature on this letter is adequate. Please. a Bruce Z. Se j koff Attorney a law BES: dlg The City of Tukwila agrees to sign off on the permit upon completion of the above mentioned application. ccs Bosco Roofing, Inc. Jim Shaker Laurie Pinard AI�N}!l�R7L }wluir� BESCO ltSco • poor Y$,Iw j'se7�:V Rooting, inc.. X33 8 Holden, Siattle, .WA OS10a `• Phone (206) 7634705 To Whom It May Concerfl: Upon completion of the previously described, fibered Emulsion, made by Western Distributors, the Fletcher 's Mean Market roof will meet Class g. Sepcifications. TO: FROM: RE: LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE E. SELIKOFF 1903 Pacific Building Seattk, Washington 98104 (206) 622 -7205 Facsimile (206) 343 -3917 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET DATE: L2gl FAX NO: 13S ' y 33 PAGES W Cove � / r): ITEMS SENT: • SPECIAL INSTRUCTIO 8 741.111A4._ .. eta Ur4)&11- /I O �... t_ • Q 1 m. • Please contact the telecopier operator at (206) 622-7205 there be any problem in receiving this facsimile: CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 Laurie A. Pinard Segale Business Park P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98188 PHONE # (206) 433.1800 April 26, 1991 Jim Shaker Ryan, Swanson & Cleveland 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3400 Seattle, WA 98101 -3034 Bruce E. Selikoff 1903 Pacific Building Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Fletcher's Fine Foods v. BeSco Roofing Ring County Superior Court No. 87 -2- 00617 -4 Dear Counsel: Gary L. VanLusen, dlayor Over the past three days, I have spoken individually with each of you regarding the roof certification issue that I understand to be the heart of the captioned lawsuit. We understand the current situation to be substantially as set forth below. After initial confusion regarding the roof specifications and related U.L. class, not now relevant to resolving the issue, BeSco installed a roof on Segale Business Park's Building No. 734 in which Fletcher's Fine Foods was and remains a tenant. In completing the roofing contract, BeSco mistakenly used a "road tar" emulsion, rather than a "roof tar" emulsion. In order to rectify the problem, and to satisfy all interested parties that the roof will qualify as a Class B assembly, BeSco now proposes to add an appropriate "roof tar" emulsion. BeSco's analysis is predicated on the following attachments: Page 2 April 26, 1991 1. Attachment A. Evanite Permaglas specification index showing that asphalt emulsion specification no. E -3SP -W is utilized on Class B roofs; 2. Attachment B. The lab report from Professional Service Industries, Inc. dated November 29, 1990, indicating that the existing roof "needs a top coat of Fibrated Asphalt Emulsion to meet the requirements of Evanite Permaglas specification E -3SP- W"• 3. Attachment C. The letter from Intec /Permaglas (which we understand from Mr. Selikoff to be Evanite Permaglas' successor) dated March 19, 1991, indicating that "it is acceptable to recoat the roof with new emulsion over the old "; and 4. Attachment D. A Zellerbach Paper Company packing list which I had understood Mr. Selikoff to say represented the materials necessary to apply the "roof tar" emulsion required for the roof to obtain a Class B rating. This must be incorrect, however, given the May 15, 1986 delivery date on this attachment. Mr. Selikoff has requested the City's assurance that the Building Department will issue the final building permit once the "roof tar" emulsion is added. Mr. Shaker has indicated acquiescence if, in fact, the "roof tar" emulsion is sufficient for a Class B rating. Ms. Pinard, like Mr. Shaker, would like to ensure that the roof as modified meets the Class B criteria and, additionally, that it have the prior approval of Segale Business Park's structural engineer. You are all experienced counsel and, accordingly, I am sure that you understand the somewhat awkward position in which the City finds itself. In order to issue the final permit, we will require (as we do with all roofing projects) the contractor's certification and warranty that the roof assembly meets or exceeds the U.L. criteria for Class A or Class B roofs. Given the fact that this determination is at the heart of the captioned litigation, however, we think it appropriate for you all to review this material and inform us of your agreement or objection. If I can answer any questions or provide further information, please feel free to contact me at 433 -1867. Very truly yours, OFFICE OF THE CITY. ATTORNEY, Enclosures cc: Rick Beeler: Duane Griffin -. PLITCUR.00i EVRR/TE PERmRGLRS, Inc. DECK TYPE NON NAILABLE DECKS RECOMMENDED SURFACING GRAVEL • GRAVEL•,... • GRAVEL GRAVEL •52. PERMAGLAS SPECIFICATION INDEX SLOPE CLIMAtIC * SPECIPICATION RANGE ZONES 0'••3" PAGE NUMBER U.L. CLASS NUM A•0•. .3„ • • - 72 , i . A 0 "•3" • ALL! . • • . G•4UP C •''.. .,.'...ZONE A:.,: •• •• GASP-O' ALL G•3UP•C ZONE A G•3SP•C • A -0".3" . :' M•410•C., A•0 "•2„ . MINEFIAL CAP•.... • . } MINERAL CAP SMOOTH CAP SMOOTH CAP ,• EMULSION CHOPPED GLASS • EMULSION CHOPPED GLASS SMCX)TH HOT ASPHALT EMULSION EMULSIFIED ALUMINUM' ;,» ;,•, ,,,ACRYLIC WHITE,:• SMOOTH HOT ASPHALT EMULSION EMULSIFIED'ALUMLNUM •_ ACRYLIC WHITE ' • • NAILABLE DECKS + See map page SS SURFACING '•e,:.. GRAVEL GRAVEL • GRAVEL'. GRAVEL• MINERAL CAP MINERAL CAP MINERAL. CAP '" MINERAL CAP • SMOOTH CAP SMOOTH CAP ' EMULSION CHOPPED GLASS ;' EMULSION CHOPPEO GLASS, SMOOTH MGT ASPHALT EMULSION " EMULSIFIED ALUMINUM'; ACRYLIC WHITE • SMUOTtl HOT ASPHALT EMULSION EMULSIFIED ALUMINUM"' ACRYLIC WHITE'_ 1/4 ",3„ 1/4".3" +/. ".3 ". 0,,.3" . '/4" g" '/4 •.„ '/ ".8" • • 4. ".3„ •+ /, ^,3 ^' , 3,• • 1/4 "..3" • t/. "•3" ,/....3., '/" "'3" 'n" 3•, SMOt)T• HUl ASPHAL.'t rMULSION '' EMULSIFIED ALUMINUM ACRYLIC WHITE SMOOTH HOT ASPHALT EMULSION " _ .. EMULSIFIED ALUMINUM';;: ACRYLIC WHITE G —Graval M-- Mineral Cup SC— Smooth Cap S-- Smooth Het E— Asohalt Emulsion ERA — Emulsified Reflective Aluminum AW— Acrylic White • •• 73 ' 73 • ZONE A' `..•Y,,. M•4SP C "' A -0 "•2" 74 75 75 ALL SC.4UP•C A.0", v.- ZONE A SC4SP•C A•0 "•1/4" 4 ` +' ALL, , ECG•3UP.C. A•0"•+h"' 75 . ZONE A', , .. ECG•i�SP•C ' 75 77 77 ALL S -4UP•C N.0, ALL E•4UP•C A•0•',1'/4" „:f:',;- • A1"""= '�'ERA4UP.C'' A„2,,.. ' AL " i''''A4U� AQ'4 ,. , ;. . • ZONE A S•4SP•0 N.C. ZONE A E•45P•C A•0 "•t1/4" r.:'• ZONI Ai" • ILRA•ASP4r'., A 471•Z"'''' - • 2. 'i.'•, ZONE A ' ' AW4SP•C • A;0•'•1/4" ALL G•4UP•W ZONE A (1.4SP•W "...ALL 7...`' G•3UP•W ZONE 'Al' ` • .. G•38 *•W • ALL M•4UP•W ZONE A MASPW ALL - •.. *3VP•W . " ....b. ZONE A ' ::' M-3SPW ALL SC•4UP•W 77 • 7T,, A -0,,,3„ A,0 „•j„ A-0".34- A -0'• -0” 78 78 • 7g 80 80 ZONE A SC•4SP•W 80 ".'/4" ALL �' r,'utlURW , • A•0 "0/1" ZONE A•„%: ,t4'• ECGl1415.W ALL S•4UP•W N.C. ALL EJUP•W 1.1.0•'•'h" " ' ALL .';?T' ERAAUPW • Bq "• Vt" . b. . rr ALL , ....... I .k. P.M;) •W 8:0 "•1tr' ZONE S•43P•W N C: ' ZONE A E•4SP•W CO". 1/4" ZONE A' .. '`�`•" .ERA•48P•W • 84)"0/," • • ZONE A ' ; ' AW.45P•W • ' , B 4":1" • ALL ALL • ALL • ZONE 'A • ZONE 4 ZONE A• • • 1/4"•3 "1 ' • ZONE A S•3UP•W E•3UP•W ERA•3UP•W • •AW3UPW 81 • 81 82 82 • 83 84 54 0 'Cijs3 "4" on Non CombUAWbl, Melia, Classy "8" on Combustible Deck0. SPECIFICATION CODE KEY DECK TYPE C— $trUCtural Concrete W— Nalloble (wood. plywood, lightweight concrete, gypsum, cementrllous wood fiber) A OTHER CODES 304VI NC. -Not Classifia SP•Super Ply UP —Ultra Ply 111— Insul•Base (venting base for use over ;Await foam Insulation) RI —Rigid InSUlrtion (Fibergle8, Perlito) II —Base Shoet "—Riot Tapir Ifor taping Insulation loInto) • C. i Professional Service Industries, Inc. Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory Division BkSCO ROOFING INC. 233 9. Holden Seattle, NA 98108 • 11/29/90 Lab 05194 REPORT NUMBER: 712 -06554 -0001 REPORT Or: Roofing Analysis PROJECT: Fletcher Meats, Tukwila, WA CLIENT: Bosco Roofing, Inc. REPORTED TQi (1) Client SAMPLE DESCRIPTION One (1) 12' x 12• sample of Asphalt Built -up Roofing obtained by Interbay Root Inspection Consultants at the above project. ?BST RiSULTS ANALYSIS OF BUILT -UP ROOFS MTN D 2829 Six* of Sample. Ft3 weight of Sample. lb. /100 Ft' weight of Top Coat (Non Fibrated), lb. /100 TV g Plys (Fib•rglaas Roofing Plys) Approximate Wt. of Int•rply Bitumen, lb. /100 ?t3 Approximate Nt. of Interpiy Bitumen /ply, lb. /100 Ft' Approximate Wt. of Total Applied Bitumen, lb. /100 Fta 0.954 176.6 73.4 3 65.6 27.8 129.0 NOTE: Values are based on average weights of 10.0 lb. /100 Fta for Superply or Ultra Ply IV end 24.0 lb. /100 Fta for Evanit• Ultra Bass Sheet obtained from Evanit• Peraaglasa Representatives on 11/29/90. sample submitted for analysis showed good bonding between plys of voids or moisture. The sample needs a top cost of Fibs to meet the requirements of ivanits P•rmaglass spscifioat lvanits DY /tls Attauhmsnt Reviewed by' The roofing o signs Emulsion as Respectfully submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERI/ICI INDUSTRIES, INC. 7400 Third Awns South • Seattle, WA 81108 ' • Phone 100/7024011 • FAX: 200/11321111 Profss&onal SMvlo. Industr4M Ma= NOM SUM) ROOFING, INC. Roofing analysis_ - Tletohsr .Mssts Tukwila. WA aaa le♦ Na . 712 -06394 -0001 oNn 11/29/90: S21t1 W.E. Elliott C4r; Io Cnr mils, f)r ton frt;+34 TotikpPona; t- VOC.541.62;s() 501754.75m FAX: (603) 758.5337 1514 75:31/ I THC /PERMAGLAS "Wing ond. Watorproofng Systems ri • I" :tttrj�r i�«:Yr; Much 19, 1091 hruce Bel ikoff 19O ,Par+i fic.• O1dg Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Pletcher Meats Tttkwi1a, WA To whom it may cohoorn: Whern an xntee /Permaglas smooth surface root membrane has an emulsion surface it is acceptable to recoat the roof with new emulsion over the old. Reuoating should be duns every four (4) to six (6) years; in order to properly maintain the roof. When :scouting, the roof taunt be clean and relatively wry, no ponding or puddles of water on the roof. During dry, hot weather . a damp surface is beneficial for the application of the coating material. Thank your for your interest in Zntec /Parmaglas. .8 0 fly, . lI ohn H. !tart Manager of.r • (.1 1991 V r. •.... BESCO • •. •• TEL No.206 - ?63 -3136 APr.10 /91 10:36 P.01. ! 'i yn. 11 4141.. • • •..,.t • • • • ._ «.• CITY OF T !.A APR 1 0 Iyb1 PERMIT CENTER %u NeY6atrt$ TO. $0x C34930 DPP?, 4001 Al •IJ. WAS$.06174 I.N. 040413250 p•.r AeNI /y k ... : mom ie-- L2 Jo . • lw!✓ / %. PACKING LIST ZELLERBACH PAPER COMPANY 1301 Alroots War South "1E — fs et%WahIMaa1110Q 1201) 11$5000 OMkn en at Anchorite, Yakima and Mambos Fir Iy •IA141OeIMMMW/Q • •1•011•1■11.. 125 �6o1SP . INVOIOI NW& IwY•A ;II, -■■•••••• • 3OS 16I. 40 .o.L.•' tea. -t>1 404. 9.g'' vs". 4141.. 4- „ 0 /_ ;; a ___ —. < • :..Otdp. #4e..., 1 rM tehti.6,►, . . Mwlwlt ' t�olw ��t�r "1cC;'✓a, ..41.00., ^ �- � .�:� Pi I mai Iv Air lt/ •I 014 elh +AAt• wee 'IMMh.y+.Lr1N.vr.*S(,a Ow bean heat el uw.+rt. s...n'rl la ..yr h1• M/ w"wNetM ammo. hw • ovedi m'h• •IP w loom/ ftpMwa1.I too Ass .IMVVt 4110V•4 Wane ne tW M•MIM.W�tN mm +t NIt11M4 AI *.su M 11'N' �.r,w•.1. .4141.1 A P. N "NW W INN* • OVA ry/M tl 1'.114 M r r•• ■4 0.4 M•O't Out* u.4 Ilesseelt pnliswe M *pi N IM • 41 41•.. 01 et MY. o. mod YMN 0' Yr ow. O (MIN* CON INIMVM WO W Area M at SWAMI MIM N Sew. the lam el Me Neell Mee* 106 II,1 Ibf Mr from OW 0.1014 Oa. M ssn �t yi ♦ Can. wised* delae Vie Nes mw s..woNur. 7 ... 0-1Fla :::_::....O: :. f's'F,‘ • t;• ; 1 CITY OF TUKWILA r � Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1845 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION (Please Print) Describe work to be done RE. vor i N Co Site Address / x`33 F . ° � Suite #� Tenant s 'A Valuation of Construction ( D ` ''(. Control #. Valuation 2f , 060 Plan Check ee Receipt # j 3971 p. 4-7 op P C 94. as S, , 5U 5v Assessors Account # Building Use Grading: Fill cubic yards Cut Type of Construction Occ. Group cubic yards Property Owner s /3 1-E 43 CA- NJ" 11s5 f'4 t Phone # S7 S— Je.70 zip. c/ 7rY Phone # 7 3 —1/-26 7? s- Z.i p D Phone # S--7S--Sk.3160 Address Applicant E'z.- -Sc.-- e--(2) /A-36 ..r; VC. Address hi O / L /--) Architect /Engineer d70 -00/ ?2.- y StGA44 Address Zip Contractor L Contractor lSC 0 G2.O©W /A16 ' License # QE S--5-14 Pone # "76,3 -`Y7dS Zip 72 /ID a. Address 33 S, /-10 L VLJ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE. SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. Applicant /Authorized Agent (signature) (print name) Contact Person (please Print) -.1"—r (8/85) Date fMAY02 1991 Cil/T y' May 1, 1991 Laurie A. Pinard Segale Business Park P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, WA 98188 LAW OFFICES OF BRUCE E. SELIKOFF 1903 Pacific Building Seattle. Washington 98104 (206) 622 -7205 Facsimile (206) 343 -3917 Jim Shaker /Rick Lentini Ryan, Swanson & Cleveland 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3400 Seattle, WA 98101 -3034 Mike Kenyon City Attorney, Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 RECEIVED 1,72Y - 2 1991 CITY OF T UKWILA CI-IY ATTORNEYS OFFICE Re: Fletcher's Fine Foods vs. Besco Roofing, Inc. Dear Counsel: I've just reviewed Mr. Kenyon's letter and spoken to him. Initially, we have straightened out the fact that the packing slip does pertain to the roof in question, substantiating the fact that it is a Permaglass roof which we have installed, top layer excepted. I think the only thing we need to do from this point on is have everyone agree that Besco will put on an additional top layer. They intend to put on fibrated asphalt emulsion from Western Coloid Products. This is in conformity with the recommendation in the letter from Pittsburgh Testing Laboratories which you all have. Additionally, if you look at the Permaglass spec sheet, this will make the roof a Class B roof. See spec # E -3SP -W is in fact. a Class B roof. ".Ji.1..V..r.. - Page,; Please -Write .to me indicating your assent to-.this procedure. When I have collected all of the agreements, I- will ":tell.Besco to proceed. ' BES: dlg cc: Alesco Roofing', Inc MEa MO . FOR F:ECORD DATE: 4/18791 FFO117, Duane Griffin, Bldg Off1 TO Mile Kenyon,' City Atty, Sk1Ed'ECT: Fl etcher ' s Meat . Rerocaf, Mi k:e, ,You- have the official building permit file on this project. The attached paperwork: should probably be aided to the fi7.e. Sel i kc ff sent me the copy of the. bi.l l for the roofing material and verbally told me he thought it shoal d prove what had been put on the roof. It would appear that the bill shows that roofing asphalt was used, and not road tar as I had been told previously . by a representative from Sigale. Other than that 1 don't think the bill changes anything, because nobody has provided evidence or, a signed statement that the actual roof that was installed was • done so in accordance with an approved manufacturer's specification sheet for a Class E rated. roof. RECORD OF TELECOM DATE: 4/17/91 FROM: Duane Griffin, Bldg Off1 SUBJ: Fletcher's Meat Reroof - Bldg Permit #4324 I talked to John Early, Manager of Technical Services, Intec/Permaglas Roofing & Waterproofing Systems, 1-800-541-6230o on 4-17-91 and asked the following questions regarding his role in this issue: Was he involved in the actual purchasing, selling, or installation of the roofing material? Not that he was aware of. What is his involvement now? No involvement that he's aware of. What was the purpose of him writing his March 19, 1991, letter to Bruce Selikoff7 He didn't remember sending the letter but when I read it to him he said it was a standard statement he would make concerning their recommended maintenance of a Pern)aglas roof. Is he saying in his letter that Intec/Permaglas smooth surface roof membranes should be installed over other product name roofing materials, or only over Intec/Permaglass systems? He said he would be referring to Intec/Permaglass systems, again as a recommended maintenance procedure. Is he saying that a coating of Intec/Permaglas emulsion makes an unrated roof into a Class B roof? He sai.d absolutely not! He then reiterated what other roofing industry reps have told me ^- that each approval for a testing lab's rating classification is based on the specifications for all the individual components shown on the spec sheets. In other words, rating approvals are proprietary in naturev not generic, and cannot be mixed and matched. He said that their manufacturing warrantee would be voided by the use of materials other than the specific ones shown on the specification sheets. Can he offer me any advice as how to get a statement from the installer that he installed a Class B roof, Spec sheet _ v manufactured by 7 He said that they require similar legal type confirmation from contractors/installers prior to issuing a manufacturer's warrantee on a roofing job. When I asked about the different types of asphalt used on built- up roofs he said there are three types. Type II, III* & IV. He gave a quick explanation of what the suggested use of each type is but basically it deals with the melting points, and what roofing materials each type should be used with based on average temperatures, slope of roof, and adhesion qualities. When I. asked him the difference between road asphalt and roofing asphalt bor. said they were entirely different and what's used in roofing is "blown asphalt". He suggested that if I needed more ' information 1 might want to contact John Fields of,Fields Roofing in Wirth Tacoma. % think he made reference to ASTM D-312' when we wore discussing asphalt. ..r. . 1 • w .. {t'� " .w�a. 4 '. i•4y r-�5 ry J w;S.,':$;; +... mo. r . t.Aw oFNCU OF BRUCE F.. SELIKOFR 1903 Pacific: Building Seattle. Washington 98104 (206) 622 -7203 Facsimile (206) 343.3917 PACSTMILK COVER SHEET RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA APR 1 0 1991 PERMITCENTER FROM: REs ITEMS SENT: bvx) PAGES (W /Cover): 7„. SPECIAL LNS'.l'RUCTIONS: ..._•...- • . .. •■••••••. . • P1•aae contict the telecopier operator at 622-7205 if theri', should MI, any problem in receiving this facsimile. • •..... BESCO • • ., • :nu PAYAaNtS TCt'. • DO X.049:10 D$ PT• 4001 Al rho, WA$$, 05174 1.N. 04.0413250 ��P,�y01 �� �1 *Ma..,I'•w i leosi.l_. ' L4.J.'W{ ". ' ' 1' ; ... k o' A�In141 P. • 1..4s ;507. 11L40 a..#/e,' 404. 9. 1/ or. TEL No.206- 763 -3136 CITY OF TU�KWILA APR 1 0 1yy1 PERMIT CENTER APr.10•91 10:36 P.01 <1,,YeQ11 ZELLERBACH PAPER COMPANY 1301 Alrporl Wolf South 11111 %, Washlnoton 10108 1208) 74 5000 Oflkel slso ot Anchor ' Yokhns end W,Mtahnn 11115:9;112112211? or Vu, 1 0 au1MA• I•VA1 •■• octet — s )tC►e� ivu*v IN`ITliiirral IF. 1uIIIUTA•• •∎∎•84/1.1111 0•••••■•••••• 125 • ; IL In IE *Me 111 • 81 LOC to CA • PACKING LIST 1•1vMi011,A'I (} 0 '--p tetat►; .1 0,4:. . • Sou dl"..• " 11An10•0 1If T10111 C�,l�',.� -/j- q. tit r" /4C; r./1 a 1.1' (It'('('•IN I'ItlI.( 111.61 f PaC1111111Y . prAINT311.111111 )1111/411. Ala 6401 LtHt 111Vtir41 A Y. , %Al loo. 64i, rd N. W p48110, M 11Uf Y /Sr/ hum 4.11 d 4.1841.v. M1.11 811 I 111,1v1 M1 1•'wMr1Mp14 MAW,. Nu NM.1A1•vu1. •Itl b. IrH1.11I «JIM11111 ON$I * *MIN! •••■••$ IN p, of 1,11jYL1.ty 1heep • 1.4•1 r•II■ 11 1•061 (1 II 1'$IY11111t 1•111•1* 1I•1 •'(11101.1•I •• ..11 •irl Mt.* %Pt. 04, M111.M p11n1M. 11 Mr) M R' •truI$ 5 IIINle•nt W `111YIM11 *nee ,1141'/11 KMY +1'Mp'$4 V14d.I M1IIU_ 6411 d1wa11 1141 M dlw+1 N 11• 1.11111 111111 M M 1 she 11116leY I11w1M 411 Mm w, WV M Sett dm. �,' COIL silos 11M *arm OwM.81NIliMIII1MwNCT, 11.1 MEMO FOR RECORD 3 \29 \91 FROM: Duane Griffin, Bldg Official TO: File The following information is being prepared as an overview of the documentation ,contained in Bldg Permit File #4324. I think the main issue, from the City's perspective, is that a roof was installed that was supposed to be rated, but based on the documentation submitted did not completely meet any UL specification sheet. My understanding of the UL approval system is that when they test proprietary type products or materials the product must contain all and only the materials as tested, not a mixture of materials from different companies. To date nobody from the roofing company involved has or will sign the city' s standard statement that requires the installer to certify the roof•was installed in accordance with a manufacturer's spec 1 sheet. FISHER ROOF INFO: 1. • On their original contract document Be Sco •Roofing said, "This roof . systen► is a• Conglas Roof Specification No. ND- 24C -SS or • equal.. This is a 15 year Class B Roofing assembly ". 2. • BeSco letter, dated June 1, 1987, addressed to me, seems to allude . that they. put on the above roof, then found out it was only a Class C roof, and the owner stated an unwillingness to pay until the roof was coated with 9 gallons of Cori -Glas emulsion and 3 pounds of chopped glass per square. a. In this letter they also say, "Please find the Con -Glas specification RI -24A -ECG which shows with this above coating, that this roof covering phould be a Class A. ". b. Attached to this letter was a small hand written note that said "The attached spec sheet is for the top coating only. (signed) Robert Larsen", and a copy of the Conglas Spec Sheet RI -24A -ECG. On this spec sheet they had circled in red ink the quantity data of certain items on the Material Requirements list, and had also crossed out the name Conshield and substituted the name BeSco for the name of the Aluminum coating. 3. In my Memo For Record, dated 7/14/87, I refer to conversations I .had with Mr Larsen from BeSco, and a Mr Musil, who was a roofing consultant working for BeSco, regarding the .above referenced letter. My memo states: " :[ told Mr Larsen that I would require our normal statement from him (see attached noti'we to Roofing Contractor Ltr) . In addition I told him I would not accept the RI- 24A -ECG Spec changing th; type of Aluminum Coating from Conshield to Besco. Mr Musil also stated to me, during a telecon I had with him, that Conshield Aluminum Coating should be used and that he would tell Mr. Larsen that. It is my understanding that. Mr Larsen will .finish the job & provide me with a statement and new spec sheet at or before the time he calls for a final inspection. ". 4. In a letter dated 12/11/87, from Jerry Mylan of BeSco Roofing to me, he stated: We BeSco Roofing Inc. are going ahead as agreed, with the'Segale & Fletcher Meats Building. I will notify the City when weather permits us to complete roof with gravel surface. It is our understanding that the application of gravel on this roof meets the Spec. "A" which exceeds the Spec. "B ", required in our contract and permit. See attached letter with spec." The letter that was attached was dated 12/3/87 and was from Mr Musil to Mr Mylari. In his letter Mr Musil stated: "The roof specification that you contracted for with the tenant was a Con -Glas ND -24 -SS which is only a Class C type roof. To make this a Class A type roof the new Con -Glas roof specification, number should be ND -24 -G on page 68 of the 1986 manufactures book. To complete this roof specification you will have to add pea gravel over the first three plies that you have installed." 5. On 4/5/88 I received a call from Ms Finard, attorney for Sigale, who said she was calling to update me on recent developments regarding the status /litigation between Sigale & Besco roofing company, She said that Besco had suggested that they would put a layer of gravel on the roof and that would qualify the roof as a Class B roof system. Sigale contacted the structural engineer of record, however, and was told the roof wasn't designed to hold that much weight. I asked Ms Pinard if she could provide me a copy of that letter and she said she would. She also said she had contacted a Bud Sields, 827 -5117, from Conglass and he is someone I could contact if a fix of some sort was proposed. I received the written confirmation of this conversation the next day (4/6/88). 6. The next action I'm aware of on this project came when a Bruce Selicoff, 622 -7205, contacted this office. The following is a quote of my memo, dated 2- 11 -91, that is in the file: "Mr Selicoff said he had recently been retained to work on the Fletcher Meat reroof project (Bldg Permit 4324). He had previously talked to Dave Larson and had faxed the attached correspondence to us. He thought he had everything under control and we would be able to final the permit based on the info he had provided. After we talked for awhile he became aware that he. did not have the same information and documentation on the project that I have in the folder, and that there are still quite a few unanswered questions, i.e., the Evanite Permaglas product that he submitted the spec sheet on is what he thought they had put on the roof - but this is a product that has never even been discussed before and is not what the previous correspondence says was used. At the end of our discussion he said he understood and agreed with my concerns and he would do some more research on the subject," 7. Before the above telecon had taken place I had contacted the P51 .Testing •Lab `technician who had done the test• and report of the sample of the roof that had been brought to them for analysis He had told me .he had run an analysis of a roof plug that had been brought to their office and issued what amounts to a generic report, in that it indicates the type of material that makes up the 'sample .but not the manufacturer. My understanding is that each manufacturer has their product tested using certain types of their. own product and the UL approval is based on the fact that those. specific products will be used and applied as tested, not mixed and matched with products from different companies. 8. On 3/20/91 Mr Selikoff faxed me a copy of a letter from a John Earley, Intec /Fe.rmaglass Roofing and Waterproofing Systems, Corvalis, Oregon referring to the recoating of the roof with their emulsion coating. I tried to contact Mr Early to find out what he was actually referring to in his letter and what the intent of it was, but nobody answers the phone at the number I have. 9. In the meantime Mr •Selikoff called inc again and said he had a hearing date scheduled for Friday, 3 /29/91, and if he didn't have this matter settled•by that time he wouldn't have any choice but to start lawsuit' action .against the city. 10. After the above phone I contacted the City Attorney's office to make an appointment to discuss this matter with him. The first time he was available was Friday morning, at which time I gave him the file, after our discussion took place, and he said he would review it at his first opportunity and contact the attorneys involved, or provide me further guidance as necessary. ` � 1 CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1845 BUILDING PERMIT PERMIT # 43,4 Control # 86 -155 ork to be done Reroof ite Address 18338 Andover Pk W Suite # Tenant Fletchers Meat uilding Use , roperty Owner M. A. Segale Phone # 575 -3200 Address P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila% WA Zip 981$8 ontractor Besco Roofing, Inc. #BESCORI -155M5 Phone -W 763 -4705 Address 233 South Holden Seaat]e, WA Zip 98108 Ken Miller 763 -4705) OR BUILDING PERMIT ONLY Assessors Account # S Ft. Sq. Yst —FT.- Office Storage! e Ware hous Retail' Other Occ. Load 2nd Fl. `3rd FT. i Total Fire Protection: E] Sprinklers [J Detectors Zoning Type of Construction Special Conditions sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. Total Valuation Bldg. Permit Fee Plan Chuck Fee Demolition Receipt # Surcharges Receipt #1394 Other Receipt # Other Receipt # Fees @ _ 1st F1. $ 2nd Fl. $ @ other $ other $ of Construction $ 21,000.00 Receipt #1394 Receipt #1394 TOTAL $ 147.00 96.00 $ 1.50 $ $ )R SIGN PERMIT ONLY 0 Permanent E] Temporary ❑ Single Face E] Double Face 0 Wall Mounted [j Free Standing Building face Setbacks: Front Square Footage of each sign face Special Conditions Side 0 Other Side Rear Total square footage of sign THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND 1010 IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF 1BANDONEU FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. 3OVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL B€ COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING Of A PERMIT IIOLATE OR NCEL THE PlptO 10NS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONST UCTInN OR CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS, AND ORUINANCES DUES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. Signed Liti,•! �3. .,.�_� �: :�.....1 ,!� �. Date_ /4. G..._ "''7777 LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION 1 hereby affirm that 1 am licens d under provisions /of t■,. Business and Professlons,Cod,,.,,and my license Is in full force and effect. Contractor (signature)•, , ) , /11 t I e ,/W‘ l i' ''` �' � fate %� ?i'l• OWNER- BUILDER DECLARATION l ) 1. as owner of the prcperty, or my employees, with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not offered for sale. 1 1 1, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractor's to construct the project. Owner (signature) Date__..__-- --- — — intended or � . a�; Meal C r ME v z iv 1rn CS1 3 a s 3 a 3 O 3 0 a 1, s ti t i • s s ▪ ▪ N N N N «AOQQ +rorrr w'w titM 9. \4o\• n I ql s.. M o i al • I I E:tstIwlsr of partlaq stalls frrlyd nraper of Darting stalls i 1 1 .. 3 3 a s 3 a 3 O 3 0 a 1, s ti t i • s s ▪ ▪ N N N N «AOQQ +rorrr w'w titM 9. \4o\• n I ql s.. M CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1845 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION (Please Print) Describe work to be done PE- g'-'t (7-- I N (; Control # 2/, /jho Plan Check Fee Receipt # .35y , . 1 4 - 7 0 0 PC 94.6o 5. 1. S ) f Site Address g..33 F /9 /..%ol.cf"ic'_. lui1e# Tenant f=t miA i Assessors Account # Valuation of Construction � -' (, °`I"' '(-"2) Building Use Type of Construction Occ. Group Grading: Fill cubic yards Cut cubic yards Property Owner • j I.6 /4 4- 2 Address Applicant .(; 6C1.e.> 0 II/ A-16 j • Address 3 s' •S Phone # Phone # Architect /Engineer 0 0 / ' , > . ) ;2 C� Y Phone # S 7 Address ' Zip Contractor /72/ S C c) G 80 0/-7A-16 " L i c flse # d E S e c' S5^14 Phone # "76 3.- `otO:5` Address .2 373 S'. f- /a1:2,J -J Zip 7 2/0 s I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED PHIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. Applicant /Authorized Agent (signature) (print name) Contact Person (please Print) T-1' 4�Y (8/85) / 'it y /. Date ` /6/..-6 Phone # •7 6, 2 -'`'/ 7 0 ,S P 01 rt -4 LAW orrlcr& OF BRUCE E. SLLIKOFI: 1903 Pacific Building Seattle. Washington 98104 (206) 6.2 -7 ?05 Facsimile (206) 343 -3917 FACSYMTLE COVER SHEET )AkDATE: FROM ;. ITEMS SENT; FAX NO.: 43(- 3 6tr / PAGES (W /Cover): SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: 1 Please contact the telecopier o orator at 622 -7205 if there should be any problem in receiving this facsimile. (..(;; 0. DFI t S31U'N,E, mkt! Cir: f0 C.rltloh, t4r$yun 41239' 0,1 Tolsphonc 1 : ;?■4 1.6214 601,54.11:01 PAK (603) 7584132 317511'' 7S-3q roh 29, 15191 Anice _$eJ. muff ;1907; Parts f'jij 81dg (cattle; . WA 90 104 RE: P1utiht r Huts ?ukwi1a, WA T4! `whom it stay concern: INTIC /PERM*GLAS.. Rooting and Walarprodting Systems Mhen an xntec /y €rmaglas smooth surface roof membrane has as emulsion . surface it is acceptable to recoat the roof with new emulsion over the old. Am: eating should be duns every fotur (4) to six (6) years in order to properly maintain the roof. 1 n: aruLC i ng, this roof tatlst be clean and relatively dry, no pending or puddles of water on the roof. During dry, hot weather s .:damp surface is beneficial for the application of the uoAting materiel ank your for your interest In Inter /Permaglas. MEMU.O °..'fE:.LECON BETWEEN .N DU(- 11\IE: GRIFFIN & BRUCE £ E1J C©FF (AT- URI'IEY ) DATE: • T I ME a CALLERS PHONE :kk: 6.22 -7205 • NR. ` SEL I COFF• •SAID : HE: HAD RECENTLY BEEN RETAINED "r0 IIJORK ON THE F"L.E1 ",CHEF:: MEA I' ; RE ROO F IJJ3 .C`1 • (DL..DO PERMIT 4324)... HE HAD' PREVI OE,UF'SLY TALKED. TO DAVE LARSO\ AND ' HAD FAXED THE.. TTACHE) • c.0ONDENC TO S . HE THCJUGHT Hr:.:• HAD EVERYTHING UNDEP::CONTF.0L (11WD WL UJCJIJL D 13E:' l- IE�L:E `l (7 FINAL. THE PERMIT pASED ) r: O THE .INFO. FE • HAD • FE•,Ov/IDEL1k"LR w (L ED -r= AWHILE' HE -BECAME AWARE . "1 HC r HE I.)ID NOT HAVE , "r HE :SAME I Nf OF MAT I ON AI\IDJ DOCUMENTATION ON THC PROJECT THAT ' I H(VF <IN `I "HL FOLDER , AND THAT . THERE AREA aT I LL L LJ T: TEw. A FEW-. UNANSWERED :QuESTICJNS,. I: E. ,. THE I'= VANITE .PERMAGLAS. PRODUCT THAT HE.. • $1 I3M I`'1 TED; "I I-ir ,' SPEC . SI -IEE.T ON I s WF-IA T'. 'HE THOUGHT THEY . HAD PUT ON ]: S • A 1'ROI)UC"r . T'HAT HAS NEVEf • EVEN • BEEN DISCUSSED :: }Ll LIRE ANt) . I S NOT.' NHA "I" THE PREVIOUS CORRESPONDENCE SAYS JAS 'USED.. (1T' TF•JE :ENlD .OF OUTS DISCUSSION .HE. SAID' HE UNDERSTOOD AND. . A .GREED W ITH ,IIY .,CONCERN, AND HE ' WOULD .DO SOME • MORE RESEARCH ON THE �: Pcj 1: Ln :4 P'OS 1.8" LAW CJFFICr* C) BRUCE E. SELIKOI'F 1903 Pacific Building Seattle. Washington 98104 (206) 622 -7205 Facsimile (2061 343 -3917 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET FROM: RE: - Ca DATE: rAX NO.: PAGES (W /Cover): -.(2) ITEMS SENTi SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: kA.;016940:44:: • ft Please contact the telecopier operator at 622 -7205 if there should be any problem in receiving this facsimile. exeCO R00PZIN0 INC. 233 S. Hoyden Seattle, WA 98108 Professional Service Industries, Inc. Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory Division 11/29/90 Lab 05194 REPORT NUMBER, 712 -06554 -0001 REPORT OFs Roofing Analysis PROJECTS Fletcher Meata,Tukwila, WA CLIENT, Bosco Roofing, Inc. REPORTED '1'0, (1) Client SAMPLE DESCRIPTION One (1) 12• x 12• sample of Asphalt Built --up Roofing obtained by Intorbay Root inspection Consultants at the above,projact. TUT RESULTS ANALYSIS OF BUILT -UP ROOFS ASTH D 28291 Ilse of Sample. FO 0.954 Weight of Sample, lb. /100 Ft' 176.6 Weight of Top Coat (Non Fibrated), lb. /100 Fta 73.4 0 Plys (Fiberglass Roofing Plys) 3 Approximate Wt. of Intes'p1y Bitumen, lb. /100 Fta , Approximate Wt. of Interply Bitumen /ply, lb. /100 rt= 21.8 Approximate Wt. of Total Applied Bitumen, lb. /200 Fta 129.0 NOTE, Values are based on average weights of 10.0 lb. /100 Fta for Evanite Superply or Ultra Ply IV and 24.0 lb. /100 Ft= for Evanite Ultra Base Shoot SS obtained from Evanite Permaglasss Representatives on 11/29/90. The roofing sample submitted for analysis showed good bonding between plys •o signs of voids or moisture. The sample needs a top coat of Pibr d Asphal Emulsion to meet the requirements of Evanite Permaglass apecifioat DY /tls Attauhmant Reviewed by, Respectfully submitted. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. 7400 Third Avenue South a Seattle, WA 98108 ' • . Phone: 200/762.4004 • FAX: 206/7834930 p .04 Professional evMo.IndustA.* ••• ..v..-- Roofing: Ply " •.....,.,,,..., .�. �. . • �...r .r ..... •...__.1 •• •• •.. MOACr tiAMI Dt*.sco ROOFING, INC. Awrras «o. own 712 - 06554 -,000 11/29/90 EVRf /TE PERmRGLRS, ince DICK TYPE NON NAILABLE DECKS SURFACING GRAVEL. • GRAVEL; GRAVEL ar,AVEL MINERAL CAP_,,'•; MINERAL CAP ! = SMOOTH CAP SMOOTH CAP EMULSION CHOPPED MASS • EMULSION CHOPPED GLASS SMOOTH HOT ASPHALT EMULSION I "• " EMULSIFIED ALUMINUM": ::x!t ',u:.,ACRYLIC WH TE,„;;,J;:.; SMOOTH HOT ASPHALT EMULSION EMULSIFIED•ALUMIN UM `_ ACRYLIC WHITE • • • NAILABLE DECKS • Gee me0 DeDe 35 iURVACINO GRAVEL GRAVEL .:w:• •!•.: GRAVEL- . _ GRAVEL • MINERAL CAN MINERAL CAP MINERAL. CAP MINERAL CAP • SMOOTH CAP SMOOTH CAP RECOMMENDED SLOPE RANGE 0 "'3 ", .. .52. PEWMAOLAS SPECIFICATION INDEX CLIMATIC • ZONES • 'iv' All••., .,. w.ZONE /�.i..'. ALL ZONE A .f:,. ALL'• ;c• ZONE A' y,.,•3.. ' EMULSION CHOPPED GLASS ;' EMULSION CHOPPED GLASS SMOOTH HOS ASPHALT EMULSION "•'" EMULSIFIED ALUMINUM': • ACOWEIC WHITE SMOOTH HOT ASPHALT EMULSION EMULSIFIED ALUMINUM "' ' ACRYLIC WHITE' ' SMOOTH Ni ! ASPHALT !'MLILSION h 7'. EMULSIFIED ALUMINUM ACRYLIC WHITE SMOOTH HOT ASPHALT EMULSION EMULSIFIED ALUMINUM ACRYLIC WHITE • -.Grave! A— Minrtral Cap 1C— Smooth Cap .-- Smooth Hot :-- Asphalt Emulsion RA— Emulsified Reflective Aluminum k— Ac'yIIC White ALL ZONE A ALL;: ZONE A •'' • ALL ALL Ala,,; �•.•; ZONE A ZONE A 7:;'. . •I.. ZONE A�� •• •;:•? • ZONE A• ALL ZONE A ,.,.. -. "ALL '; ZONEW `1 v4"•3" 1/4°1" 'y. ",3" y V. "•3" „4 •• 3.. 1/4 ..•3.. 1/,1,•3., •• /4'13' y4"• 3•• ALL ZONE A Aur.er•. ZONE A • • ALL ZONE A . ALL ,.r...: ZONE A•' ALL ALL ALL ALL ZONE A ZONE A • ZONE A' ' ZONE A • ALL ALL . ALL' " ALL. • ZONE •A ZONE A ZONE A ' :' ZONE A SPECIFICATION NUMBER • 0-4UP-0 •' i.1r... G.4SP•C' . G•3UP•C 0.3SP•C M•4UP•C ,. SC•4UP•C SC•45P.0 ECO•3UP•C • ECG•3SP•C ' . S•4UP•C E•4UP•C i ERA•4UP•C''' Ii%'•-'•.•I • AW4UP•G;; ,•. 8.4SP•C E•4SP•C „•_• ERA-4SPC " .: AW4SP•C G•4UP•W G•4SP•W G•3UP•W' ' �G•3SP•W • M•4UP•W M•4SP•W M•3UP•W M•3SP•w U.L CLASS A.0"-.3"', A O •3 • A.0".3" A•0 "•3" A -0 ".2": A.0".1/4" PAGE NVMI1sER 72. 4. • .••73 73 !';'• 74: ; 5C•4UP•W SC•4SP•W v�.,:', ECG•3UP•W 14 ECD -SSP•W S•4UP•w E•4uP•w ERA4UP•W • i..� . AW -4tiP.W S.4SP•W E•4SP•W M1" ERA.4SP•W • • AW.SP•W S•3UP•W E•3UP•W ERA•3UP•W • AW3UP•W N.C. A•0 "•1'h" A.0"0/4 N.C. A•0 "• I ;5" A -0113,1 , .... A•0"•3�' g0" t /4.. 75 75 76' 77 77 77 • 77; N.C. Lt•0 "•'h" 0.0' CI,.. 0:0"- V." • N.C, B {l.. 1/ 11{0"•1" 81.1,1., 78 78 80 so • 8y• • 81 62 82 • 83 83 84 8844. ..,. 64 • -,� 85 65 • 85 . .,. 65 4f A • 'Clams "A" on Nott CombuM bte DuCkti, Can "I3" On COntbuattbl• Oecka SPECIFICATION CODE KEY DECK TYPE C— Structural Concrete W— Nallable (wood, plywood, lightweight concrete. gypsum, cementatious wood Mbar) • OTHER CODES NC.Not Classifie SP —Super Ply UP —Ultra Ply 10— Msul•Sese (venting base for use over plastic foam insulation) RI —Rigid Insulation (Flbergl &8, Periital 0 --6aan Sheet T —Root Tips (for tADIng tn4ulilinn joints) • 233 S. Holden, Seattle, WA 98108 • Phone (208) 783.4705 ROOF fi1D SPECIFICATIONS PRC)J C.T 734 Flet'c hers Fine Focxis REROf)F BUILDING 734 1. Tear off Inci Hedeck Roof A. Remove northern most. 20' of existing roof system - 1860 SF. B. Remove southwest eurcitu. to existing roof system - 87651'. C. Replace removed root using the same materials as specified above, bringing the sumacue of the replacement up to the same grade as the balance of the olcl roof. D. Clean -up and dispose of demolished materials on a daily basis. 5/14/86 2. Install New Roofing A Remove and set aside existing sheet metal edging for reuse. B. Clean existing roof surface, particularly at the perimeters. Apply asphalt pruner in low areas to kill residual dust. c. Cut out wrinkles and blisters in the existing roofing. D. Mechanically fasten 1 ply of 28 lb. fiberglass base sheet. Hot mop 2 additional plies of Type IV fiberglass ply sheets and surface coat with emulsion applied at 0 per 100 square feet. Innerply moppings of 1 the rate of 30 lbs. per 100 square feet per per 100 square feet. E. All perimeters will be reinforced with an smooth surface cap sheet. F. Install sufficient roof system vents to all system to escape; . . • G. Reinstall sheet metal edging. H. This roof system is a Ccnglas Roof Specification No. ND- 24C -SS or equal. This is a 1.5 year. Class B nn Hoofing assembly. r l ccasgs mechanical equiprne that roofing may run continuously ;uncle 1. A heavy bead of p. P be applied around the base as," of each leaded or Al after the new roof VP ,s410)9 system is installe �" -.0" 3. General b 1:)C/s)'* t tl:e A. Provide 5 year war L leis. • B. The Contractor shall manage a safe job envirooment for the safety of all persons around the work site including. but not limited to, �, workmen. In addition, Contractor's safety program shall ensure the safety of the Owner's property. $ r f )P• Commercial /Industrial Reroofing -- Cold Appllostlon 17 ND-240_ 20 Years — U.L. Close A Slope Range: iY" to 3" '1 j 11:111 1 Materials required per 100 square feet of roof area shall not be IS than the fo1100111tgt Mechanical fasteners II/ as required Conbuse Typo W-1-IV (2) — 1 ply 25 lbs. Conply Type A•IV — 2 plies 22 lbs. Asphalt' plies 60 lbs. Asphalt" surfenc GO Ibs. Gravel Or 400 Ibs. ?leg 300 lbs. Accessories and fI stomp materials as required. ND-4C-SS 70 Years — U.L, CIN$ C Slope Range: 1 /2" to 3" , Materials required per 100 square feet of roof area shall nut be lees than the ((Mowing: Mech•;nirtel'listeners 111 as requireo Conbasu Type W1•IV 12) — 1 Ply 25 tbs. Conply Typo A•IV — 2 plies 22 lbs. Asphalt• piles 60 lbs. Asphalt• Surface or 25 ills, Emulsion 3 gal, Accessories and hashing motorists as ruqufred. a, 4v ... — r a.. .. . APPLICATION ** F rY ,. •,•: :r,...1s:.•:etmt • r. ,u.r THE ROOF DECK shall be firm, clean, dry and smooth. CONDASE TYPE W.1.IV shall he applied at right armies to continuous joints of surface to ise roofed and lapped so water flow is over or parallel to, hut never against, the lops. It shaft be lapped 2" on sides and 6" on ends arid nailed on 9" Centers through the lops and on 18" centers along lines 12" distant from each edge. It shell be turned up 2" abOVe tho cant on all walls and vertical surfaces. CONPLY TYPE A•IV shall be applied parallel to the base sheet and lapped so the flow of water is over or parallel to, but never against, the laps. All end laps shall be at least 4" and adjacent end laps shall be at least 12" apart, Embed two plies of Conply Type A•IV in shingle fashion, lapping 18 ", into uniform solid ntoppings of itot asphalt, plied at a nominal rate sroomurl, using a All plies Shall be turned Id to the cant and vertical sf slag per 100 square deck. On stones 2" par " from the back edge of an extra layer Of Conply 8" up the inclines out on of the roofing Plies. Embed the full width of ' ' of 30 the, par 100 square moderately soft commerc up 2" above the top of th wall. Embed not less that feet per ply. Roofing altol foot or over, the 01Y sheet each sheet. VALLEYS Al which shall be at least 36" of the valleys, This ply sh (1) Refer paragraph 2,13 particular deck, (2) It is suggested that Co base shoat on neilabte advantage of its ability from the deck, Refer paragraph 2.1 of "General Requirements" for proper meltpoint of asphalt for Slope involved, All application requirements from "General Requirements" section are considered part of those Gpecificatiord. •r C • proper fasteners for to of Type W1.IV sk installations to take pressure coming up APPLICATION ** THE ROOF DECK shall be firm, clews, dry and smooth. CONBASE TYPE W1.1V shall be nppiied at right anflleS to continuous joints of surface to be roofed and lapped $0 water flow Is over or parallel to, but never against, the laps, It shall be tanned 2" on sides and 6" on ends and nailed on 9" centers thruulils the laps and on 18" centers Wong turf., 12" distant from each edge. It shall be turner. 2" above the cant on all svirlls end vertical turfeces. CONPLY TYPE A•IV Shall be applied parallel to the base sheet and lapped so the flow of ureter is over or parallel to, but never aQuinst, the laps. All encl laps shall be at least 4" end adjacent end laps shall be at least 12" apart. Embed two plies of Conply Type A•1 V rn shingle fashion, !upping 19 ", into uniform solid moppines of hot asphalt. Embed the full width of each ply sheet in hot asphalt applied at a nominal rate Ot :30 lbs. per 1110 square feet. Each ply shall be lightly groomed, using a moderately soft commercial broom, as it is applied. All plies shall be turtles/ up 2" above the top of the contend shall ba toll—'4 mopped to the cant and vertical wall. ON SCONES EXCEEDING 1.1 /2" per loot asphalt shall b9 applied at the nominal rate of 25 Ibs. per 100 square feet per ply. Roofing shat) be applied parallel to slope ul deck. On slopes 2" per foot or over, the ply sheets shall by moiled to the deck 18" from the back edge of each sheet. VALLEYS AND WATERWAYS shall receive an extra layer of Conply which shall be at least 36" wide and shell extend at sorest 8" up the inclines out of the valleys. This ply shall be laid prinr to the application of the rooting plies. Coat entire surface with uniform solid mopping of hot asphalt, using not loss than 25 Ibs. per 100 square feet o, Cant•o.t CC-20 emulsion using not less than 3 gallons per 100 SQuare feet. (1) Haler oaragrauh 2.13 of "General Requirements" for proper fasteners for pm tit:ul,r deck. (2) It is suggested that Corselet Prebase may be used in lieu of Type Mt UV Wier street err portable lightweight poured•In•place deck mttallt,lions to 'eke advantage of Its ability to disperse moisture or vapor Pressure coming up from the deck. Refer pelegreph 2,1 of "General Requirements" for proper meitpoint of asphalt for slope involved. All application requirements from "General ►fequirements" section are considered put of theta specifications, .• 1 April 5, 1988 'APR c, 1988 e.GALE BUS /NESS PAFikr'``r-Ir DEPT D 1;rr,I I�I�II����. Mr. Duane Griffin Building Official CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 RE: Segale Business Park Building No. 734 Roof Dear Mr. Griffin: I'd like to update you on the status of the above- referenced matter. In October of 1987 Segale Business Park agreed in writing that it would approve any "fix" for the Building 734 roof which meets the following two criteria: 1) It must have the approval of the City of Tukwila, and . any codes with which the City requires compliance; and 2) It must have the prior approval of our structural engineer, Dean B. Ratti (E.g. the building must be capable of supporting the fix without harming the structure, its ability to withstand snow load, etc.). In December of 1987, BeSco the roofer who last applied material to the Building 734 roof, proposed the application of pea gravel to the subject roof. We have attached a copy of Mr. Ratti's letter of December 29, 1987 analyzing this proposal and you will note that he did not approve same. At this time, BeSco has proposed the application of a different material. Once we have received specific information about . this material, we will submit the proposed "fix" to Mr. Ratti for his analysis. P.O. 80X 68050 • TELEPHONE: (206) 575.3200 • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 981811 11,44.11” *A. In :the; meantime, BeSco may contact you to evaluate this proposal in terms of compliance with..City of Tukwila standards. ::'You may .wi'sh - to review your files /materials, in preparation for this contact, and we will appreciate your efforts in analyzing this second. proposal. Very truly yours, SEGALE BUSINESS PARK r e '. inard orney ,or:Mario A. Segale,: a:.Segale. Business. Park :Enclosure I'ERBIX CLARK, December 29, :1987 4..11711. TA `»x1111 r ELlPlit'Sli: : 11 t .. l IN' : IL ::1. Rt lIt'R'r50N .1i! ?�. �.�:Ui�HL►N rv. r. • Segale Business Park P.O Box 88050 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Ms. Ann J. Nichols Roof Structural Capacity Segale Building 734 Dear Ann: As you requested, we have reviewed the roofing specs and building plans you forwarded with your letter of 21 December, 1987. Our analysis indicates that the roof joists (2x4's @ the additional weight of gravel, based on the most criteria of L/ 180. We : have also determined that 4x14 where they support the freezer roof panels would be addition of gravel would, therefore, ,diminish the requirement in at least the members noted above, and that does not conform, to the minimum requirements of We,,therefore, recommend that. you do not place gravel'on 24 ") cannot support liberal deflection: purlins in the area overstressed. The 25 psf snow load:' create a condition the Building Code. the roof. If we can be of further assistance in this hatter, please advise us.. Very truly yours, RATTI PERBIX A CLARK, P.S. Consulting ,fin ' i neers Dean 8.(Ratti DBR:dI TELEPHONE MEMO RE : FL* YQ r. d Vetoe) g-rtcf r y 3 'L/ PERSON CONTACTED: I) C-2�✓� PERSON CALLING: k1S Pfrvia /et 6-75-- 0200 DATE: INFORMATION ITEMS: 6-to Yom' 21- Q T iaT' -1i 4y I' ,S, `v (� /'� 9i- S-cyic?/ 5"' J' 5_,65 6.cp gl) ‘./p0/04 (4,1 iAP C /apx,a,r7 yte Mit:41 9kft,_ U 04410 /fr 41-7 62.2d1 ✓7 1 e-. $4 gPSr'(-) %tP:'G (5- irc1 , ! ,d, o /Q� '� T �/ 149 &) L(( /C \/eY , �u P� cry, fk, Yoc9, 1%4 wQm (d 4c?) t'i/, l� /DO / S el456 cc 116,9 SJYCt c AIN 1 e-11f mac -e Y ot) 1 y/i c 07,1 4 c,,t U Y) .1,,,l( to ck s voki P roof a,l y de,, 2c V Ac CI gq/ -*(00L1 c-1)1 7L-- dS ( •f /. Cot,(cl /y o 'cl &ley aT `/ %7 ,le4pr 5-1e ,rv%c✓ 5-l<, cdoti/c% 4 0750 ,'etjcI o iia 007 l'(cr c `tcf at d =':. S; ids 727-51/7 / bass °Ad HP is frinc0c.72Q 1 0 --c t (c ec7, -ia c f- if Q -i_x 0--g -tiL 10Y0-pc)-(2 r( B eSCO Roofing, Inc. o iii o 0 0 233 S. Holden, Seattle, WA 98108 • Phone (206) 763.4705 Mr. Griffiths City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Wa. 98108 Dear Mr. Griffiths, We BeSco Roofing Inc. are going ahead as agreed, with the Segale & Fletcher Meats Building I will notify the City when us to complete roof with gravel surface. weather permits It is our understanding that the application of gravel on this meets the Spec. " A " which exceeds the Spec. our contract and permit. 1, B n roof: required in See attache d letter with spec.; 'Jerry)(ylan BeSco Roofing, Inc. Commercial /Industrial Reroofing Cold Application Cr. 9. P.O. Box 6159 Bellevue, We. 98008 December 3 1987 Jerry Mylan Basco Roofing, Inc. 233 South Holden Seattle, Wa. 98108 The roof specification that you contracted for with the tennant was a Con -G1as ND -24 -SS which is only a Class C. type;. roof. To make this a Cl ass ' A type roof the new Con -Glas roof specification number should be :ND -24 -G on page 68 of the 1986 manufactures book. To complete this roof specification you will have to add pea gravel over the first three plies that you have installed. 'sr, :i:<9 t l_...,. r , .:..._ -__.._ .....__ Metal* required leer 100 aqua,., feat of roof area' shall not beans then the following: • Mechanical fineness (1) ea required Console Type W1.1 V (21- 1 Ply 25 lbs.` ConPlY.In* A•IV — 2 Alin 22 lbs.- Aphalt• Plies 00 lbs.., . Asphalt• iu,f.cs e0 Ness. Gravel or 400 Nu. Slap 3001tnt. Aotessorles and flashing materials rs required. APPLICATION ** THE ROOF DECK shall be firm; clean, dry and smooth. CONBASE TYPE W4 lV shall be applied at right angles to continuous joints of sides' to be roofed and lapped so water flow is over or parallel to, but never against, the laps. • It shall be lapped 2" on sides and 0" on ends end nailed on 0" centers through the laps and on 16" centers along lines 12" distant from each edge. It shell be turned up 2" above the cant on all walls and venial surfaces. CONPLY TYPE A•IV shall be applied parallel to the base sh set ern lapped to the flow of water is owr or .: parallel, to, but never against; the Irsps. All end laps shall be at lean 4" and adj o nt end laps shall be at least 17' apart. Embed two plies of Cenply TYpe . A4V in shingle fashion, lapping 19", into uniform solid mappings of hot asphalt. Embed the full width of arch ply sheet In hot asphah applied at a nominal rate . • of,30 lbs. per 100 square feet. Each ply shall be lightly brimmed, using a Moderately soh commercial pushbroom, as It is applied. All plies shall be turned up 2" above the top of the ant and shall be solid mopped to the sant and vertical wall. Embed not lass then 400 lbs. of gravel or 300 lbs. of Mag par 100 square feet.per ply. Roofing shall be applied parallel to slope of duck. On dopes 2" per • ' foot Or over, the ply sheets shall be neiled"to the deck 16" from the beck edge of each sheet. VALLEYS ANDWATERWAYB shall receive en extra Iryar of ©arnpiv • which shell be at Nast 36" wida'and shall extend at least 6" up the inclines out of the valleys. This ply shall bi :Ulid prior to the application of the roofing plias. • (1) Refer paragraph 2.13 of "General Requirements" for proper fasteners for • Particular deck. . (21 his Suggested sleet Canal's Probes' may be used M lieu of Type W -1 -IV• best sheet on neileble lightweight poured•n•plaa deck installations to take advantage of its ability to ;disperse moisture or vapor pressure caning up from the deck.. • Refer paragraph 2.1 of'"Gen'ra1 Raquiremants" for proper amNtpolnt of asphalt for slope involved. «• All application requirerrines from "General Requirements" section err considered part of .than apsciijeetions. P.O. Box 8.158 .: .. Bellevue, Wa. 98008 ��U �.1E1 Telephope CITY OF T$JK WILA' PLAN' G DEPT. Mr Griffth City Of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Wa. 98108 Re: Fletchers Fine Foods in' Tukwila. '. Dear Mr. Griffth, As per your request I am inclosing my resume. I have been chairman of the committee that helped write the roofing manual for the National Roofing Contractors Association. This manual is I understand used by about BOh,of the major roofing contractors and architects through aut the united states. . Musil Jr:. I N T E R B A Y R O O F I N S P E C T I O N C O N S U L T A N T S P.O. Box 6159 Bellevue, WA 98008 (206) 641 -2171 LAWRENCE T. MUSIL, JR. President I offer a complete roof inspection service from specifications to on -site roof application inspections. Thirty -four (34) plus years as a trained roofing applicator to include 23 years as a major roofing contractor and roof consultant. Services include the following: 1. Completed roof application inspection with written reports. 2. Moisture roof test scans. 3. Roofing or re- roofing specifications for all types of buildings. • 4. Cost accounting for your complete job, including sheet metal work. . Inspection while your new roof is being installed. Hourly - daily - as required. 6. Test plug laboratory testing. 7. Expert court witnesses. 8. Any areas throughout the U.S., including Alaska. 9. Act as agent for settlement through negotiation. 10. Approved American Arbitration Association arbitrator. A service for roofing contractors, architects, attorneys and owners of all types of buildings. Page 2 ' LTM Resume Formerly: Interbay Roofing Company, Inc. Performed contract completion on approximately 4,400 different types of roofing and sheet metal contracts. This includes specialty waterproofing and roof insulation work. Twenty -three years as roofing contractor doing commercial, industrial, government, state and local agencies. Work includes schools, colleges, Trident Naval Base, banks, Children's ,�. Orthopedic Hospital, K -Mart Stores throughout Washington, Oregon, Montana, Alaska, Idaho and Minnesota, and various other types of buildings. Formerly: Interbay Sheet Metal Corporation • Served as President for approximately 6 years until closed, and sheet metal work was then performed through Interbay Roofing Company. Specialty was architectural sheet metal work for commercial and industrial buildings as outlined above. Both roofing .and sheet metal corporations were operating at the same time. PAST EXPERIENCE: 1949 -1957 Two years roofing apprentice school. Worked as a roofer applying roofs, progressed through Superintendent, except. for 2 years in the Merchant Marine and 2 years in the U.S. Army in Korea. 1958 -1981 • Owner and President of two corporations serving the roofing and sheet metal industry. Jobs located in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Minnesota, Montana and Alaska. OFFICES HELD: 1958 -1982 Served two -year term as President of Washington Roofing Contractors Association. Many years as a Director of Washington Roofing Contractors Association. This involved various other offices of this association. Thirteen years on Labor Negotiation Committee for Washington Roofing Contractors Association. Served eight years as Chairman of this committee. Six years (two 3 -year terms) as Director for National Roofing Contractors Association. Served as Chairman of Waterproofing Committee for five years. This committee wrote the new waterproofing manual which is being used now by roofing and waterproofing contractors throughout the United States. Architects are also using the manual as a guide for good roofing practices. • . . ' Rage 3 LTM Resume 1958 -1981. (Cont'd) 1980 -1981 1981 -1986 CONSULTING: Served on the Technical Assistance Program for five years for. the National Roofing Contractors Association. Also served on various other committees for this association. Speaker at Roofing Superintendents Conference for National Roofing Contractors Association. Speaker at Construction Specifiers Institute (CSI). Four years Treasurer of Condominium Association. Also served as head negotiator for this association to settle out -of -court settlement for construction defects. Acted as consultant for completion of repair work. Treasurer of Construction Industry Contractors (CIC) and Director for three years. Six years as Director of Western States Roofing Contractors Association. Served as President of Western States Roofing Contractors Association. Full time roofing, waterproofing, and sheet metal consultant; on -site roof application inspections; many court cases as an expert witness. Have performed consultant work for some of the following: Attorneys - as expert witness in court. Roofing contractors, architects, and owners throughout the United States. Different states and local area Attorney General's offices and the Seattle Times Troubleshooter column, as well as many other awarding authorities. Have completed roofing specifications for architects, school districts, state agencies and contractors for many years. Roof application inspections for owners and national corporations throughout the United States. Work Area Proposed: Almost any state requires roofing inspection before, after roofing application. Serve as expert witness architects and contractors (roofing or otherwise) in waterproofing inspection. during, and and assist roofing and ff,Q.4,10 kist2,441 (t)46-‘if, ic&Q,24 Qitct.c, „IN Vial jtert42ta,Q Atm gi) J24 1 aNA -cc C Sf-52-e, emtk T,� /td24L, , c7.0war �� ou„ ditia4t1 .(6)z- abud4 L4ZatJSL, it tLec, k;e0)LQd 064ultze421), - atk cal° ,JW-eirk cd),,,,ttt (14a A ilue2r241 Aelage #r.0 q „dad) -4.-,u-62-6 Llief L City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 1206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor NOTICE TO ALL ROOFING CONTRACTORS: For all reroofing and roofing projects that require a fire retardant roof covering under the provisions of Section 3202 (b), 1985 UBC, the Tukwila Building Department will require a written statement from the installer stating the following (or some- thing similar). This statement must be provided before or at the time of final inspection. I HAVE INSTALLED A ROOF MEMBRANE ASSEMBLY, INCLUDING INSULATION IF APPLICABLE, CONSISTING OF (Manufacturer) , SPECIFICATION # DATA SHEET ENCLOSED, WHICH MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS A OR CLASS B ROOFS. THIS ROOF WAS INSTALLED AT (Address) UNDER CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING PERMIT NO. The statement will include the name of the roofing company that installed the roof, signature of installer, and date. BeSco Roofing, Inc. OrSow 11001, wsTEM 233 S. Holden, Seattle, WA 98108 • Phone (206) 7634705 Mr. Griffiths City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Wa. 98108 In urtef 1fll'1 JUN - 5 1987 ;11'Y Of '1 UtsvViLA PLANNING DEPT. Re: Fletchers Fine Foods, 18338 Andover, Park West in Tukwila. Dear Mr. Griffiths, The roof specification the owner requested a hid on was a Con -Glas ND -24 -SS which I now understand is only a Class C roof covering. We completed this roof last year and the owner will not except the completed job until we coat the roof with 9 gallons of Con -Glas emulsion and 3 -lbs of chopped glass per square. After this has set install 1 gallon of BeSco aluminum per square. Please find the Con -Glas specification RI -24A -ECG which shows with this above top coating, that this roof covering should be a Class A. The roof slope is 0 -1/2 ". We are submitting this letter and information for your approval before we spend the large amount of funds out of our pocket just to complete our contract and resolve this problem for everyone. The owner has approved this work and I would like to get the city of Tukwila's approval in writing that this change would be approved by the city if this work was completed. We want to be assured before we start, that the city of Tukwila will accept this roof covering with these changes as meeting the city code. The city of Tukwila approved the origional roof covering specification on May 16th 1986 under the permit # 4324. This request was submitted without anyone knowing this specified roof was only a Class C. The above change should close out this outstanding problem. Commercial /industrial Reroofing — Cold Application Page 2. Thank you and if you have any further questions please myself or Lawrence T. Musil Jr., at Interbay Roof Inspection Consultants, 641-2171. Please send your approval or remarks as soon as possiab.le. The owner has given us only a short time to:complete this work.. This problem has been outstanding for over a year. 'Sincerely,. . . . Robert Larsen BeSco Roofing Inc. cc: Fletchers Fine Foods Inc. 18338 Andover Pk. W. P.O. Box 88337 Tukwila, Wa. 98188 Att:Morley W. Jasman .` � al . RI24AECG U. 1. CLASS AI SLOPE RANGE: 0" to 1/2" insulated deck •1•111 ,Ab,l • 'NA DNS L••t4CONG1 AS COIm +St «I I• •111WLn•10,1w f4•,010011011.1•0.1.1•1 •IX11,44 •s•,w, 1*0.A•I,IS Cfl4 31 AS r1M... •1v MATERIAL REQUIRED PER 100 SQUARE FEET OF ROOF AREA Approved Roof Insulation 100 sq. ft. Conbaso W -1 IV, 1 ply 25 Ibs. Conply Type A•IV, 2 plies 22 lbs. Asphalt, plies Concoat Emulsion(9 gal. Glass Fibers '" (5-I1g0 Conshtefa Aluminum Coaling, j gal. (8 Ib8J Accessories and Flashing Materials as Required. U. L. insulated •� "�I A11„•1•.A RI-34A-ECG S NSLOPE RANGE: 0" to 1/2" • yst� coral As C.( BA P I'RLI LA•1NSCVa1.SS C11101• •1Y v, MATERIAL REQUIRED PER 100 SQUARE FEET OF ROOF AREA Approved Roof Insulation Conbase W1 IV, 1 ply Conply Type A•IV, 3 plies Asphalt', plies Concoat Emulsion, 9 gal. Glass Fibers Conshleld Aluminum Coaling, 1 gal. 100 sq. ft. 25 lbs. 33 Ibs. 120 lbs. 72 lbs. 3 Ibs. 0 Ibs. Accessories and Flashing Materials as Required. APPLICATION ** WOOD INSULATION STOPS, Iho same lhicknoss'es tho insulation, shall be inslallod at tho edges of the dock and at all projections through the dock. curbs, pipes, etc. Those stops shell be 6" wide or one (1) inch wider than Ilangos boing nailed to Thom THE ROOF DECK shall be hum, cloan, dry and smooth during !he application ol insulation, BUR and all other materials. ROOF INSULATION shall be applied In approved manner with joints In the long dimension of tho board con• llnuous and joints in the short dimension of the board staggered at least 24'. Insulation shall be properly fabricated to lit around projocllons. Broken edges or excessive gaps shall be properly filled to provide a uniform surface for the BUR. CONBASE WI IV shall be applied at rlghl angles to the continuous Joints ol the surface to be roofed. Con. base W1 IV shall be lapped 2" on sides and 8" on ends Lap so the flow of water is over or parallel to, but • never against, the laps Turn up 2" above lop of cant on all walls and vortical surfaces Embod the full width of each sheet in lull uniform mappings of hot asphalt applied at a nominal rate of 30 lbs per 100 sq f1. CONPLY A•IV shall be lapped so the now of water Is over or parallel to, but never against, the laps. All end laps shall be at least 411 and adjacent end laps shall be at least 12" apart. EMBED two (2) plies Conply A•IV in shingle fashion, lapping 19" with a 17" exposure. EMBED the lull width of each sheet in hot asphalt applied at a nominal rate of 30 lbs per 100 sq. f1. of root area. Each ply shall be lightly broomed, using a moderately soft commercial push broom, as it i5 applied. All plies shall be turned up 2" above the cant and shall be solid mopped to tho cant and vortical wall. Buckles or lishmouths shall be cut and repaired properly. THE SURFACE to receive coating shall be clean, uniform, smooth, and dry. All lishmouths, buckles or dry laps shall be properly repaired prior to applying coating. COAT THE ENTIRE SURFACE with Concoat (plain) omulsion appliod at a minimum rale of nine (9) gallons per 100 sq. ft. of root area Chopped fiber glass roving shall be simultaneously embedded in tho emulsion at a minimum rate of Ihroo (3) lbs. per 100 sq. ft. ALUMINUM COATING shall bo appliod in strict compliance with mnnulacturer's reconlmondaliorls and applied at a minimum rato of ono (1) gallon per 100 sq. It oI roof area VALLEYS/WATERWAYS shall rocowe an extra layer of Conply A•IV which shall be al toast 38" wide. It shall nee tend at leas) 8" up inclines out 01 valleys This ply shall be lad on lop of base sheaf prior to application of other pl es Embed the lull width ol each sheet in a uniform mopping of hot asphalt applied at a nominal rate of 30 Ibs per 100 sq It. of root aura ON SLOPES exceeding 1.1/2" per fool hot asphalt shall be applied at a nominal rate of 25 lbs por 100 sq. 11. of root area. All BUR shall bo applied parallel to the slope of deck, On elopes 2" per foot and greater the ply sheets shall bo "back•nailod" to the deck or wood nailors (on insulated specifications) por tho following schodulo: Ply Shasta Nall these Distances From Sack edge 2 18" 3 12" 4 18" Concap shall be back nailed with two (2) rows nails staggered 3" oc. OPTION: The above specification may bo applied with cold procoss adhesive by effecting the following substitutions. 1. Substitulo 3 gallons Conhos,vo por 100 sq ft. vs 30 Ibs hot asphalt. 2. Substitute Conbaso W1 IV as a ply shoot wherever Conply A•IV is required. • Refer to traction 2.15, page 18, for proper moll point ol asphalt for slope involved. •• ALL application requirements from tho "General Requirements" soclion are considered part of these specifications • isy , APPLICATION ** WOOD INSULATION STOPS, the same thickness as Iho insulation, shall be installed at Iho edges of I,. and at all projections through the dock curbs, pipes, etc. Those slops shall be 8" wide or ono (1) than flanges boing nailed to Mom. THE ROOF DECK shall bo him, clean, dry and smooth during the application of insulation, BU materials. ROOF INSULATION shall be appliod in approvod manna, with joints In the long dimensio linuous and joints in the short dimension of the board staggered at toast 24 ". Insulation fabricated to fit around projections Broken edges or excessive gaps shall be properly uniform surface for the BUR. deck wider nd all other CONBASE WI IV shall be applied at right anglos to the continuous joints of 1h base W1 IV shall be lapped 2" on sides and 6" on ends. Lap so the flow of w never against, the laps. Turn up 2" above top of cant on all walls and venlcal of each shoot in full uniform moppings of hot asphalt applied at a nominal r •'' CONPLY A•IV shall be lapped so the flow of water is over or parallel to, •, laps shall be at least 4" and adjacent end laps be at least 12" apart. the board con• I be properly to provide a e . ace to be roofed Cqn• is over or parallel to, but -'laces. Embed the lull width of 30 Ibs. per 100 sq It. never against, the laps. All and EMBED throe (3) plies Conply A•IV in shingle fashion, lapping 24• EMBED the lull width of each shoat in lint asphalt appliod at a n• area Each ply shall be lightly bummed, using a modoratoty so ,• les, shall be turned up 2" above the cant and shall bo solid oulhs shall bo cut and ropauod properly THE ',t FACE 10 rocorve coating shall be clean, unilor laps shams roporly ropauod prior to applying coatint COAT THE E7'S E SURFACE wdh Concoat (plain) ,,'d,ron applied at a minimum ralo of moo (9) gallons per 100 sq 11 oI roe Chopped 11hm glass rovml ;' all bo 'iimultanoousty omboddod 111 111, smut run al a minimum rate of th,o�'. Ibs por 100 sq 11. ALUMINUM COATING ah' k_ , applied in strl•, 'omphance with manufacturer's rocommondatiuns and applied at a minimum rate of one (1)� • per 100 It of root area. i4 nth a 11•V." exposure al rale of 30 Ibs per 100 sq ft of root fmmorclat push broom, as it 1s applied All ped 10 the cant and vertical wall. Buckles or mooch, and dry All lishmouths. buckles or dry VALLEYS/WATERWAYS shall race' a layer of Conply A•IV which shalt be at least 36" wide. II shall ex• tend al leas' 8" up inclines out of volt • his ply shall bo lard on top of base shoot prior to application of other plats. Embod the full width of . s ,_ n a uniform mopping oI hot asphall applied at u nominal role of 30 lbs. per 100 sq It ol roof ar:r ON SLOPES exceeding 1.1 applied al a nominal rale of 25 Ibs per 100 sq It. of roof area All BUR shall .1 deck. On slopes 2" per loot and greater the ply shoals shall be "back•naile `� sulated specifications) per the following schedule' O Ply Sheets 2 3 4 Concap shall OPTION: T substrluti , Nail Ih h" rot hot asphall be be .plied parallel to the s�'• •'rci the dock or wood nailors\`° Distances From Back edge to" 12" 18" ack nailed with Iwo (2) rows nails staggered 3" oc . bove specification may bo applied with cold process adhesive by effect e following 1 Su; "lute 3 gallons Conhesive por 100 sq It vs 30 Ibs hot asphalt 2 stilulo Conbaso W1 IV as a ply sheet wherever Conply A•IV is roquirod aim 10 aoetion 2 15, pogo 18, for proper moll point of asphall for slope involved ALL application requirements from Inc "Goneual Requirements' section aro considered part of these specifications r BeSco Roofing, Inc. 233 S. Holden, Seattle, WA 98108 • Phone (206) 763.4705 CIiY OF illK A APPROVED r,1f '1I 1 (i 1986 uL C'tiN(; l)IVI inr;i" REROOF BUILDING 734 1. Tear off and Redeck Roof A. Remove northern most 20' of existing roof system - 1860 SF. B. Remove southwest corner to existing roof system - 876SF. C. Replace removed roof using the same materials as specified above, bringing the surface of the replacement up to the same grade as the balance of the old roof. D. Clean -up and dispose of demolished materials on a daily basis. ROOF BID SPECIFICATIONS PROJECT 734 Fletchers Fine Foods 5/14/86 2. Install New Roofing A. Remove and set aside existing sheet metal edging for reuse. B. Clean existing roof surface, particularly at the perimeters. Apply asphalt primer in low areas to kill residual dust. C. Cut out wrinkles and blisters in the existing roofing. D. Mechanically fasten 1 ply of 28 lb. fiberglass base sheet. Hot mop 2 additional plies of Type IV fiberglass ply sheets and surface coat with emulsion applied at the rate of 3 gallons per 100 square feet. Innerply moppings of hot asphalt will be at the rate of 30 lbs. per 100 square feet per ply for a total of 60 lbs. per 100 square feet. E. All perimeters will be reinforced with an additional ply of 40 lb. smooth surface cap sheet. F. Install sufficient roof system vents to allow moisture from old system to escape. G. Reinstall sheet metal edging. 1-l. This roof system is a Conglas Roof Specification No. ND- 24C -SS or equal. This is a 15 year Class B Roofing assembly. In all cases mechanical equipment will be raised such that roofing may run continuously under all such equipment. I. A heavy bead of plastic roof cement shall be applied around the base of each leaded or unleaded metal projection after the new roof system is installed. 3. General A. Provide 5 year warranty on labor and materials. B. The Contractor shall manage a safe job environment for the safety of all persons around the work site including, but not limited to, workmen. In addition, Contractor's safety program shall ensure the safety of the Owner's property. CommerciallIndustrial Reroofing -- Cold Application BeSco Roofing, Inc. BeStu ROOF SYSTEM 233 S. Holden, Seattle, WA 98108 • Phone (206) 763.4705 REROOFING BUILDING 734 page 2 C. Debris shall not be allowed to remain mound the buildings during performance of work, but shall be dispc... of on a daily basis. On completion of work, the buildings and grounds shall be left in a neat, clean condition acceptable to the Owner. D. Extreme care shall be used to prevent asphalt material from making contact with or resting or remaining on eaves, facia boards, any painted or stained surfaces, brick walls, sidewalks, lawns, shrubs, etc., and the Contractor shall be responsible for the cleaning of any such surface and restoring the area to its prior condition. E. No material shall be applied when moisture can be dectected on the roof or when moisture can be detected on any materials to be installed on the roof. 4. Miscellaneous Roofing Items A. All conduit support blocks shall be replace with Wolmanized 2x4 blocks cut of the same size and shape. If additional blocks are required to properly support the conduit, they shall be installed. The conduit shall be securely fastened to each support block. B. New pipe leads shall be installed replacing the existing leads. C. Four mechanical unit supports need to be secured, canted, flashed and a metal cap installed. The support shall be properly secured to the deck. After a two inch cant has been installed around each support and flashing is completed in accordance with the specifications, a galvan- ized metal cap shall be installed between the mechanical unit and each support. The mechanical unit shall be properly secured through the metal cap to the support. D. There are two 4x4's approximately twelve feet long supporting an internal cooking system. The Tenant has stated that they will be replaced with new treated wood. The new supports are to be properly flashed using two inch cants and the specified flashing procedures. 5. City Engineering Review The Tukwila Building Department will require that an engineer inspect the building or drawings to determine whether these buildings will support the extra weight of the new built -up roofing applied over the existing built -up roofing. Report cost shall be paid by Tenant. 6. Building Permit Cost Cost of plan check and building permit fees shall be paid by Tenant. 7. After making repairs to the existing roof surface called for in the specifications, the new roofing application can successfully be installed without adverse effects to its serviceable life resulting from the existence of the present roof surface. Commercial /Industrial Reroofing — Cold Application s..:i?£.4',ii "- ?i:'. BeSco Roofing, Inc. 233 S. Holden, Seattle, WA 98108 • Phone (206) 763.4705 REROOFING BUILDING 734 Beko HOOF SYSTEM page 3 9, BeSco Roofing, Inc. agrees to indemnify and save harmless the owner, its officiers, agents, and employees, and Fletcher's Meats, from and against any and all suits, claims, losses, costs, penalties, and damages, of whatsoever kind or.nature, including attorney's fees, arising out of, in connection with, or incident to BeSco Roofing, Inc. performance of this contract. In:the event that the Tenant vacates, the building prior to the expiration of the warranty, all rights under:that warranty shall extend to.the .owner. CommerciaNnduslrlalRerooting ' Cotd;Applicetion BeSco Roofing, Inc. 233 S. Holden, Seattle, WA 98108 • Phone (208) 7634705 REROOF COST ELEMENTS 1. Ter Off and ReDeck Roof 2. Install New Roofing 3. Miscellaneous Roofing Items 4. City Engineering Review 5. Building Permit Cost 6. Lifting The Roof Top Mechanicals PAYMENT SCHEDULE: $ 4,950.00 14,250.00 1,450.00 by Tenant by Tenant 350.00 $21,000.00 1,659.00 $22! 659.00 One third dawn payment and the balance upon completion of work. All material is guaranteed to be as spindled. AN work 10 be completed in a wodultanlike manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costa writ be executed only upon written adore, and MI become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreenvante conlln wr upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. Owner 10 carry Ire, tornado and cVtur necessary insurance. Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Campeneellon Insurance. Signhorlied ature wNI hdraTwrl w M not ioorpted within days. Acceptance of Proposal— — the above prlc.e, ttip.clfoatloni and conditions are satista Tory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made u outlined above. Date of Acceptance Signature Signature Commercial /Industrial Reroofing Cold AppllcatIon • 7/ ijY 01 iti ••'vVit.I P P t; ()'V i 1) r':ii...E COPY I understand that the Pon Check ::;,;. ruvals subject to error:: and omissions plans does not au'ft "ize the violc,tk• ti ar ;.r;/ Woofed code or ordinance. Receipt of contra copy of approved plans •<,c.;c.zowle::;ed. By... INSPECTION RECORD CRY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Division Phone: (206) 431 -3670 PROJECT: t-t,141 f $ - •O4 SITE ADDRESS: 12 33' TYPE OF INSPECTION: 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 PERMIT NO. 3 Z SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS INSPECTION RESULTS /COMMENTS: DATE CALLED: 7.- 3(.. 1/ DATE WANTED: 7.-3/- /- S/ REQUESTER: 4 PHONE NO.: INSPECTORt 1' 86360 DATE: .., T (may N w , o1 ,,„-:, , Sf_) z „, .„.., coo L`` V t,N 4 c, kJ) w 0 aCr Q`) o CUSTOMER'S ORDER NO. 0 0 • • • N a • 0 0 u i 0 0 0 v i 0 0 0 QUAN DESCRIPTfON 'RICE AA.1UUNT 12 1 # 4 (d& / 1 2 J 1 . ` a m N '': �: n.. .. .. ... ✓'J�. ern i`. ... e`ti CO rn 0 t0 L 2 o 0 0 U L �cCI? (2.(,[qf In,* L. Piw,LA, SEGALE BUS /NESS PARK April 5, 1988. Mr. Jim Shaker RYAN, SWANSON & CLEVELAND Bank of California Center, Suite 3200 Seattle, Washington 98101 RE: Fletcher's Fine Foods, Inc. v. BeSco Roofing, Inc. et al. King County Superior Court Cause No. 87 -2- 00617 -4 .Dear Mr. Shaker: .This. letter will acknowledge receipt of your March 15, 1988 letter transmitting Charles Meyer's March 14, 1988 letter regarding the above- referenced matter. First, allow me to address Mr. Meyer's letter. Mr. Meyer seems at best confused about the.. representations made by Segale Business Park (SBP) in October, 1987. Reference is made 'to Mario A. Segale's letter to Morley Jasman, dated October 30, 1987 and setting forth the agreed criteria for any "fix" of the roofing job on Building 734. A copy of this letter is attached for your reference. You will note that Segale Business Park NEVER approved the use of gravel on the Building 734 roof as a solution. Instead, SBP provided objective criteria for evaluating any proposed "fix ". SBP has honored this commitment and Mr. Meyer's accusation of a 180 degree reversal is at the very least insulting. Mr. Meyer continues his letter by asserting that the roof on Building 734 is "three years'old, and has withstood all of the tests of time." Of what significance in this assertion? • P.O. BOX 11050 ■ TELEPHONE: (206) 575.3200 • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 911 Y Jim Shaker, Esq. RYAN, SWANSON & CLEVELAND RE:. Fletcher's v. BeSco April 5, 1988 Page 2 Mr. Meyer also asserts that the application of the originally specified roof coating would make the Building 734 roof a Class B roof. The specifications for this project were BeSco's. There is nothing in BeSco's specifications which suggests or condones the use of road asphalt on the roof. These specifications indicate that after applying unspecified and untested road asphalt to a roof, the roof may achieve a Class "B" rating by being "frosted" with the originally specified material. Finally, in order to avoid any misunderstanding and to provide information upon which our structural engineer may make his analysis, we would appreciate receiving specific information regarding the material which BeSco proposes to apply to the Building 734 roof. While we can read the language "originally specified coating" we are not roof experts and in order to make certain that we convey the correct proposal to Mr. Ratti and that Mr. Ratti has information sufficient to perform his analysis, we would appreciate BeSco forwarding specifications for this material on an order of specificity similar to those sent with BeSco's previously proposed "fix ". In response to your letter and in keeping with SBP's commitment,:.. we will forward BeSco's current proposal to our structural engineer as soon as we receive specifications upon which Mr. Ratti can make an analysis. In the meantime, you might suggest to BeSco that they approach the City of Tukwila with such specifications to inquire whether this application will meet part 1) of the two pronged criteria outlined in Segale Business Park's October 30, 1987 letter. Very truly yours, Pinard or Segale Business Park ure SEG ALE BUSII!/ESS PARK October 30, 1987 Mr. Morley Jasman FLETCHER'S FINE FOODS, INC. 18338 Andover Park West P. O. Box 88337 Tukwila, Washington 98138 RE: Building #734 Roof Fletcher's Fine Foods, Inca vs. BeSco, Segale Business Park et al. Dear Mr. Jasman: This letter will confirm our conversation in your office yesterday regarding the above- referenced matter. As you. recall, it is my position that we will accept any "fix" of the roofing job on Building 734 provided that the fix meets the following two criteria: 1) It must have the approval of the City of Tukwila, and any codes with which the City requires compliance; and 2) It must have the prior approval of our structural engineer, Dean B. Ratti (E.g. the building must be capable of supporting the fix without harming the structure, its ability to withstand snow load, etc.) For this consideration, you agreed that you will immediately remove us from the above - referenced lawsuit. Please have your attorney take care of this immediately.. Laurie informs me that there is an arbitration scheduled for the end of this month - it must be cancelled. Feel free to have your attorney call Laurie in our offices here if her cooperation is needed. Thank you. Sincerely, .00500ss..N✓ Mario A. Segale MAS:dem P.O. SOX uoso. TLLLPNO,m (201)37s4200 • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Mil .:Ya►..t .have.; thie .official°.bt ..ti1dinq. permit +i1 c.n this proTect: Thi,e :attwchc d:,.pa.c pi r or,k : : ho.1:d Or Obabl."y he added to t +he , f i. l :e. .5e1 1 kof4' . aent' me .-.the':copy..: crf..the bi 11• .for the roof 1..69 .mater:ia1 .: artd :verlbial. ] y ticii d,: me.,,he thcit.tght•: i. t • she Lt1 d t s fr obe. n what,1 had been :p �.l t cn kae, rodf t wau1'd ,appear.•,that. ` the bi,1 Saw`s :hat . r acaf.1ng , . aspha] wa' i ed;: ; and nok ' rnad :tar as . 1 hd ee totd prev:.ot.isl y . by t ;repreentative from S,i..ga1e, . Other tan; tat 1 don't .thinkr. -`,. . the bi 1.1 . i,.hariLJcs anyth i. ncj bei' aL.tse nobody':has provided•: evi.denoe'• ei a :'.sa grted <,stcctement,that: the . :ctu4kl ,.roof 1.hatk; was 1ns'tal led; was clone _so 1n ..accorda-anc.e. wi,1:h an:, approved, >manufacturer'.'s peoi: f.::oati.on sheet 'or a ,;C1ass .E :•:raged roof • .RECORD OF TELECON pATLd 4/17/9:1 FROM . puane Cri.ffi.n,. p1dg ©f +l. SUBJ a F1 etcher ' s Meat Reroof - Bldg Permit #4324 talked to John Early, Manager of Technica]. Services,. Tntec /F'ermag].as Roofing & Waterproofing Systems, 1- 8W7544•-- 623u, on 'I-17 --91 and asked the following questions 'regarding his . rol e in :this issue Was `he involved i n the actual pur•chasi. nq , sel ]. i ng, or instal..l.at:ion of the roofing mati rial? 'Not that he was aware of. What i s his i. nvol verent now? No involvement that he's aware of . What was. the purpose of him writing his March 19, .1991, letter to Bruce Splik:off?. He didn't remember sending the letter but when 1 -read it to him he saai d it was a standard statement he would make concerning their recommended maintenance of a F'ermaglas roof. is .he Saying in his: l.ei.ter that lntec /F'ermaglas smooth surface, rciof membranes should be i nsta]. l ed over other . product name :rraofi.ng. rnaaterials, or only over intec /F'ermaagiass. systems? He said 'he would be. referring to Inter /F'ermaglass systems, again as .a recommended maintenance procedure. •.ls he saying that a coating of Inter /Permaglas..emulsion maE eS ; :an ui rooted' roof into "a :Cl: ass ,,L roof? He • i ai. d absolutely not!' . He ,then reiterated what other roof i rig industry reps . have told me. that each iapprovafor a testing l.ala's rati.ng classification is Las on the specifigati.ons for all the individual components shown on the spec. 'sheets., Jr other words,..`. rating approvaals, are' : prod ri.e ary i.n naturE, `not generic, and cannot be mixed :and maatc-I �v d . He eai d 'that their manufacturing :Warrantee would. be ..voi rJei ; by the use of materials other than .the specific ones : shaven nn the,.specification.sheets. Can he Offer me any advice as how to get a statement,from the i l. nsta l er that he installed a Class B roof., . Sper. sheet ranufactured by _. ? He said that they require similar: legal type Confirmation from contractors /installers prior to issuing a manufacturer's warrantee on a roofing job.. ..When -I asked about the different types of asphalt used: on built up roofs he said there are three types. Type 1 1 , 1 T T , < IV. jle ga+ e:_a quick: es; planation of whaat the suggested use of each type is :but. bcsica].ly it deals with. the melting points, 'and what roofing materials each type should be used with ' based on average temperatures, slope 'of roof* :.and adhesion qual,iti,es. .J41166:1 asked him the difference between road asphalt a and roofing asphalt he .said they: were entirely different and wheat's used in roofing . is s a "blown aasphtl.t" . .He-suggested that if '. 1 needed more' information 1 might-want to contact John Fields of Fields` Roofing . in. North l'acoma.. T think ho. made reference tv Aal"M ..D -:w%t2 when 'we were.: di.scussing asphalt. LAW ornces OF BRUCE E. SEL1KOFF 1903 Pucilir Building Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 622 -7205 Fucsimile (206) 343.3917 PACSIMILE COVER SUBET DATE= 15 01 .q. )6, FROM: FAX NO.: RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA APR 1 0 1b9 PERMITCENTER PAGES (W /Cover): .0 ITEMS SENT: • 7_, AVM irMIT .1/4 amormio "SPECIAL LNS'i'RUC'L IONS: Please contiact the telecopier operator at 622 -7205 if there should be. any problem in receiving this facsimile. WWI CI' %4 • X.....• BESCO .. TEL No.206- 763 -3136 u P *vdienrts To' SOK.CAM DPP?. 4001 Al TA Wp011.01:174 I. N. 94.0413250 ;;6:4J;o ,ti•AtreTE• ZEI.LERBACH PAPER COMPANY 1301 Airport War South km1%, Washington 11toe (2001 7146000 O11kes oleo o1 Anchors , Yakima end Wonotchn r rl CITY OF TUKWILA APR 10 b 1 PERMITCENTER APr.10191 10:36 P.01 •••••••••••••. _..M... • go, I..WttIM • MINIM s •.. —... liF• e.04144111 OW* *WA PIM -.• •.raw.. pa5 141■••••• K t w L �. �^ ......� •..�. +1414. Sc-a I j.o0f".11.1 J�� i' • ,'. 1414.. :5s ; 619 . No : •- .ca --t> •1 e,' 4 9.0? or t,I 1 PACKING LIST POALo$ Hum tww4.411 Wit M +oc 1 11111E9 r L i_•�41.1..Yli. w..r.._ "•r. ▪ ..�� -ice Ando 774/4 tek.V.4; .1.4) . • 1414. . 1414. --- .irM-- ',TlMtriIONr _. • 1414__...._. -- 1-1-•14 - kit t it `✓t •. '•M (II' (H!P!'IiN I'IUUI.l , I ,'I )1t:11',I: Ixi I f 1. 0A. ••••••. r- r_ - r. • 4,1, T 144111n1 SY II .fir Tr /iZ►igi11 it ;MOSY laragAl 1'4N ).7',1140. two 44.0. MA IN sI w ■• avow WM i..,• IWA. MN. Y p'a's w 4014. bon 4.w. dm tto brim. "II ~�w�6. g r,NOr/QM Nu w14IMMM 6 I Y. IOWA/ as podia dNMrr*A*,INWA • I r hip rN i w Il ('11114 M r' ap.p•I 1MIWMt OOP M 11140 N ..• NII 1h4 woo SW* 1.4. Iowa; 4 ear) M Ir twill.• I�,N ntb•Irlwe mill. ' 11'., .• * 0104 •' marry, v04 el err h.. • gm* $r CS N/ww WI be •Mw.i N w wiwr4 ON 11 • SAW d1. IOW 1 YM me'* NMI MI- 11 MEMO FOR RECORD 3 \29 \91 FROM: Duane Griffin, Bldg Official TO: File The following information is being prepared as an overview of the documentation contained in Bldg Permit File #4324. I think the main issue, from the City's perspective, is that a roof was installed that was supposed to be rated, but based on the documentation submitted did not completely meet any UL specification sheet. My understanding of the UL approval system is that when they test proprietary type products or materials the product must contain all and only the materials as tested, not a mixture of materials from different companies. To date nobody from the roofing company involved has or will sign the city's standard statement that requires the installer to certify the roof was installed in accordance with a manufacturer's spec sheet. FISHER ROOF INFO: 1. On their original contract document BeSco Roofing said, "This roof system is a Conglas Roof Specification No. ND- 24C -SS or equal. This is a 15 year Class B Roofing assembly ". 2. BeSco letter, dated June 1, 1987, addressed to me, seems to allude that they put on the above roof, then found out it was gniy a Class C roof, and the owner stated an unwillingness to pay until the roof was coated with 9 gallons of Con -Glas emulsion and 3 pounds of chopped glass per square. a. In this letter they also say, "Please find the Con -Glas specification RI -24A -ECG which shows with this above coating, that this roof covering should be a Class A. ". b. Attached to this letter was a small hand written -'note that said "The attached spec sheet is for the top coating only. (signed) Robert Larsen ", and a copy of the Conglas Spec Sheet RI -24A -ECG. On this spec sheet they had circled in red ink the quantity data of certain items on the Material Requirements list, and had also crossed out the name Conshield and substituted the name BeSco for the name of the Aluminum coating. 3. In my Memo For Record, dated 7/14/87, I refer to conversations I had with Mr Larsen from BeSco, and a Mr Musil, who was a roofing consultant working for BeSco, regarding the above referenced letter. My memo states: "I told Mr Larsen that I would require our normal statement from him (see attached notice to Roofing Contractor Ltr). In addition I told him I would not accept the RI -24A -ECG Spec changing the type of Aluminum Coating from Conshield to Besco. Mr Musil also stated to me, during a telecon I had with him, that Conshield Aluminum Coating should be used and that he would tell Mr Larsen that. It is my understanding that Mr Larsen will finish the job & provide me with a statement and new spec sheet at or before the time he calls for a final inspection. ". 4. In a letter dated 12/11/87, from Jerry Mylan of BeSco Roofing to me, he stated: We BeSco Roofing Inc. are going ahead as agreed, with the Segale & Fletcher Meats Building. I will notify the City when weather permits us to complete roof with gravel surface. It is our understanding that the application of gravel on this roof meets the Spec. "A" which exceeds the Spec. "B ", required in our contract and permit. See attached letter with spec." The letter that was attached was dated 12/3/87 and was from Mr Musil to Mr Mylan. In his letter Mr Musil stated: "The roof specification that you contracted for with the tenant was a Con -Glas ND -24 -SS which is only a Class C type roof. To make this a Class A type roof the new Con -Glas roof specification number should be ND -24 -G on page 68 of the 1986 manufactures book. To complete this roof specification you will have to add pea gravel over the first three plies that you have installed." 5. On 4/5/88 I received a call from Ms Pinard, attorney for Sigale, who said she was calling to update me on recent developments regarding the status /litigation between Sigale & Besco roofing company. She said that Besco had suggested that they would put a layer of gravel on the roof and that would qualify the roof as a Class B roof system. Sigale contacted the structural engineer of record, however, and was told the roof wasn't designed to hold that much weight. I asked Ms Pinard if she could provide me a copy of that letter and she said she would. She also said she had contacted a Bud Sields, 827 -5117, from Conglass and he is someone I could contact if a fix of some sort was proposed. I received the written confirmation of this conversation the next day (4/6/88). 6. The next action I'm aware of on this project came when a Bruce Selicoff, 622 -7205, contacted this office. The following is a quote of my memo, dated 2- 11 -91, that is in the file: "Mr Selicoff said he had recently been retained to work on the Fletcher Meat reroof project (Bldg Permit 4324). He had previously talked to Dave Larson and had faxed the attached correspondence to us. He thought he had everything under control and we would be able to final the permit based on the info he had provided. After we talked for awhile he became aware that he did not have the same information and documentation on the project that I have in the folder, and that there are still quite a few unanswered questions, i.e., the Evanite Permaglas product that he submitted the spec sheet on is what he thought they had put on the roof - but this is a product that has never even been discussed before and is not what the previous correspondence says was used. At the end of our discussion he said he understood and agreed with my concerns and he would do some more research on the subject." 7.. Before the above telecon had taken place I had contacted the PSI Testing Lab technician who had done the test and report of the sample of the roof that had been brought to them for analysis. He had told me he had run an' analysis of a roof plug that.had been brought to their office and issued what amounts to a generic report, in that it indicates the type of material that makes.up the sample but not the manufacturer. My understanding is that each manufacturer has their product tested using certain types of their own product and the UL approval is based on the fact that those specific products will be used and applied as tested, not mixed and matched with products from different companies. 8. On 3/20/91 Mr.Selikoff faxed me a copy of .a letter from a John Earley, Intec /Permaglass Roofing and Waterproofing Systems,. Corvalis, Oregon referring to the recoating of the roof with their emulsion coating. I tried to contact Mr Early to find out what .he was actually referring to in his letter••and what the intent of it was, but nobody answers the phone' at the number I • have. 9. In the meantime Mr Selikoff called me again and said he had a hearing'date scheduled for Friday, 3 /29/91, and if he didn't have this:matter settled by that time he wouldn't have any choice but to start lawsuit action against the city.. .10..After the above•phone I contacted the City Attorney's .office °to make.an.appointment.to discuss this.matter with him. • The first time he was available was.Friday morning, at which time. I . . gave -him the file, after our discussion took place, .and he said he 'would review:it at his first opportunity and contact the- ..attorneys involved, or provide me further guidance as necessary. :el • .3 .... :* A .:"(•■.... li!,,,d1:010:: IVS.r.'''.81t;"11:1(!•. ''.. • ": ' , . • •• ' 3n, LAW OFFICFP. OF BRUCE E, SEL1KOFP 1003 Pecifie Building Seattle. Washington 98104 (206) 672-7705 Facsimile (206) 141-)917 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET tiEs ITEMS SENT; YI1/4DATE: • P 01 FAX NO,: PAGES (W/Cover): SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: • •• • I Please contact the telecopier ok)erator at 622-7205 if there 1 i should be any piOblem in receiVing this facsimile. • . Y. • S211.1 N,E. elllott Ctr;IG Corvallis, )r$,pn fr 39 ' ott TolrphOne; 1460C.541.6410 503.754.75!:01 FAX: (643) 759.5332 (9)7L/. 75 :3`� •1414rt3h 19, 1091 INTHC /PERM*GLAS s Roofing end Waterproofing Systems Aruce 9e].ijwff 1.903 Peui t'ic Bldg Seattle, WA 9x144 RE: Fletcher Meats w 'tukWi1a, WA To whom it may cobeern: When an tnteo /Perraglas smooth surface roof membrane has an emulsion surface it is acceptable to recoat the roof with new emulsion over the old. P 02 Aeooating should be dune every four (4) to six (6) years in order to properly maintain the roof. When reaout,ng, the roof must be clean and relatively dry, no ponciing or paddles of water on the roof. During dry, hot weather a damp surface is beneficial for the app] ication of the coating material. Thank roux• for your interest in Intec/Permaglas Zyr ohn H. earlyf Manager of 'r conical Services 667-6F "T6k ii.A' Pt:.01 l4Nr� 1?s: 2.: 1E110 OF 7'EL.ECC)N BETWEEN DUANE . GRIFFIN DEUCE SELICOFF.: (ATTORNEY-) .CALLERS PHONE !kk a b22 -720. 1IF, SELI COF F SAID- HE HAD '.RECENTLY BEEN RETAINED-, TO ., WORK ON ,THE • F"LaETCHER MEAT RERC)OF PROJECT. (BI DG :.P'ERNIT 4 ).. :He -HAD PREVIOUSLY ,"CALKED:: fO .DAVE' LAF,EOI\I SAND HAD FAXED THE' 'ATTACHED CORRESPONDENCE TO US . ; :: HE: THOUGHT HE . _ HAD .EVERYTHING ::: UNDER : CONTROL. 1ND ;WE WCIUL:D BE `A iLE TO .FINAL .THE ; FERN I T BASED 011 THE INFO: HE , I HAD F'F;OV.IDED. : AFTER WE STALK :ED''FOR AWHILE .HE BECAME AWARE THAT:.. HE DID NOT : HAVE ;. THE SAME: 'I NFORMAT I ON AND ' :.DOCUMENTAT ION ON THE :'PROJECT `1'HA 1" I RAVE ] N THE :FOLDER OLDER . AND THAT THERE , iARE:.,ST I LL QU I.TE •A .FEW UNANSWERED QLIEST.I.ONS' I.E. , :THE EVANITE :F'ERMACLAS PRODUCT THAT .HE SUDM,T'i"TED TNI' ;SPEC. EHEL.T ON ;IS WHAT HE THOUGH`] `;:THEY HAD•'FLJT.< ON THE :ROOF" =- lei l t" TI I;IS 7 A . PRODUCT 'THAT HAS :,NEVER;'EVEN • BEEN DISCUSSED ' BE ORE AND. p ;I S NO1 WHA r ; THE PREVIOUS COf RESPONDENCE SAYS, WAS <:USED, AT 'THE ::END 'OF` OUR 'DISCLJSSIUINI HE ",SAID HE : UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED W TH C'IY CONCERNS AND HE WOULD DO SOME' MORE RESEARCH ON THE SU%JECT» n :4 ", ' F'OS: J. igoOnimvamervillassiallisikkolisameasairiallis ._......a- LAW oFFIrrA OF BRUCE E. SELIKOFF 1903 Pacific Ruilding Seattle. Washington 98104 (206) 622.720 Facsimile (206) 343.3917 FACSIMILE COVER 8SEST' TO: ---Lou"kLitvu*A) uct.F ROM . RE: ITEMS SENT: DATE: VAX NO.: P 01 ici•L (7/3/- 3 4-4,8".- PAGES (W /Cover): SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: ik CA Iciu Please contact the telecopier operator at 622 -7205 if there should be any problem in receiving this facsimile. HESCo ROOFING INC. 233 S. Holden Seattle, WA 98108 Professional Service Industries, Inc. Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory Division • 11/29/90 Lab 95194 REPORT NUMBER% 712- 06554 -0001 REPORT OF Roofing Analysis PROJECT: Fletcher Meats, Tukwila, WA CLIENT: Bosco Roofing, Inc. REPORTED TO' (1) Client SAMPLE DESCRIPTION One (1) 12' x 12' sample of Asphalt Built --up Roofing obtained by Interbay Roo! inspection Consultants at the above project. TEST RESULTS ANALYSIS OF BUILT -UP ROOFS (ASTM D 28291 Rime of Sample. Ft: 0.954 Weight of Sample, lb. /100 Ft' 176.6 Weight of Top Coat (Non Fibrated), lb. /100 Ft* 73.4 Plys (Fiberglass Roofing Plys) 3 Approximate Wt. of Int•rply Bitumen, lb. /100 ?t' 35.6 Approximate Wt. of Int•rply Bitumen /ply, lb. /100 Ft* 27.8 Approximate Wt. of Total Applied Bitumen, lb. /100 Ft' 129.0 NOTES Values are based an average weights of 10.0 lb. /100 Fti for Evanite Buperply or Ultra Piy IV and 24.0 lb. /100 Ft= tor Evanit• Ultra Bass Sheet as obtained from Evanit• Permaglass Representatives on 11/29/90. The roofing sample submitted for analysis showed good bonding between plys - o signs of voids or moisture. The sample needs a top coat of Fibr d Asphal Emulsion to meat the requirements of Evanits Permaglass apecifioat DY /tls Attachment Reviewed by Respectfully submitted, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. 7600 Third Avenue South • Seattle, WA 110101 ' • phone: 200/7024861 • FAX: 200/753.2930 MOA T NN AI DISCO ROOr'ING, INC. Roofing Analysis - flstahsr teats Tukwila, WA MO/OCT NO, 712 - 06994 -0001 DAn 11/29/90 MO MAF7 C SVRn /'11 E PERmRGLRS, inc: DECK TYPE NON NAILABLE DECKS SURFACING RICUMMCNDED SLOPE RANGE GRAVEL,' . GRAVEL.:..., :. GRAVEL GRAVEL • NAILABLE DECKS It Gee map page 35 SURFACING MINERAL CAP•,; MINERALCAP : • SMOOTH CAP SMOOTH CAP EMULSION CHOPPED CiLA6S EMULSION CHOPPED GLASS SMOOTH HOT ASPHALT EMULSION 77" EMULSIFIED ALUMINUM', ' ;'•,u;ACRYLIC WHITE;;wj.; SMOOTH HOT ASPHALT EMULSION EMULSIFIED "ALUMINUM'_ • ACRYLIC WHITE ' '. GRAVEL GRAVEL GRAVEC GRAVEL •'' MINERAL CAN MINERAL CAP MINERAL. CAP MINERAL CAP • SMOOTH CAP SMOOTH CAP EMULSION CHOPPED GLASS 1 EMULSION CHOPPED GLASS SMOOTH MGT ASPHALT EMULSION EMULSIFIED ALUMINUM'_' WHITE. . SMOOTH HOT ASPHALT EMULSION EMULSIFIED ALUMINUM...* • : ACRYLIC WHITE' • •.'. SMOOTH HO ASPHALT cMULSION ;'•'• EMULSIFIED ALUMINUM • ACRYLIC WHITE SMOOTH HOT _ ASPHALT EMULSION ' EMOLSIFIED ALUMINUM';;'• ACRYLIC WHITE • • 0—Gravel M— Minoral Cup SC— Smooth Cap S-- Smooth Hot l-- Asphalt Emulsion ERA — Emulsified Rolleclive Aluminum AW— Acrylic Whits y.,.-15" '/a ".6" *wow! 144 1/4".3" '/. ".3" %”3.. ,/ "..8" 1/4.'4" ,/4 ,,,0.. -52. PERMAQLAS SPECIFICATION INDEX CLIMATIC * ZONES ALL ALL ZONE A ZONE A "` =': I'.'.M•4SP•C SPECIFICATION NUMBER w;, G•4SP•C G•3UP•C G•3SP•C ALL U.L. CLASS A.0".3" A•0 "•3" • A -0".2 PAGE NUMEEP 72 ..73 73 SC4IUP•C A-0".1/2" ZONE A SC•4SP.0 A•0 "•1/4" tyyir' ALL; ,: ; ECa.3UP.O. 'ZONE A ; ,i ECQ.3SP.0 :... A'0'•,y ", .. ALL S -4UP•C N.0, ALL E•4UP•C A.0".1 Vs" ..�,� ERA.AUP.,0 :•.. A-0"-24."- :1/4;i17: ALL � I .r:y�.AW 4UP•Q .:. A Q,,,'/ ZONE A S.4SP•C N.C. ZONE A E4$P•C A•0 ".l 1/2" 7;T r. ti.,-• 1 ,.• . �ZONt A;, :. EpA�ISP•C'^ A -0. •�'. ZONE A '. < . AW.4SP•C ALL ZONE A ;... "ALL 7` ZONE Av.' G•4UP•W 0.4SP•W G•3UPAA • G•38P•W ALL M•4UP•W ZONE A M•4SP•W ALL.. ,a ..• M•3UP•W .. ZONE A .' M•3SP.W • ALL SC4UP•W ZONE A SG4EP•W ALL . ; ...: ECG•3UP•W • ZONE A•'%• /Ri.'• EC • 'SPAN '4 "•3" ALL S•4UP•W 1/4"•3" ALL E•4UU•W ALL .; ... _"!Tt ERA-4UP•W' . • ALL r`.i,; AW4UP•W 1/4-.3- ZONE A S -4SP•W '/. ".3" ZONE A E•4SP•W /�.. 3.. ZONE A'' ' ., ,....:ERA.4SP•W 1/4"•3" • • ZONE A ' • AW+ISP•W '•'." 3" ALL S•3UP•W '/• "•3" ALL E•3UP•W • 1/4"•3" ' ALL" ' • ERA•3UP•W• •ALL A•3UP•W /.'•3" ZONE 'A 1/4 •..3" ZONE A '/. "•3" • ZONE A ; • '/."•3" _ %- • ZONE :A A ye I A•0 "•3" A -0"•3'/ •. A 01.3" 75 75 77 77 77 ,,,• 77t' • 77 •' 78 78 it 70 • 80 80 81, 81. B.0".1/4" 60".Y4" N.C. n.0".1/2". :'i� N.C: • . 0,0 "•1 /r" B:0"04" •� N,C. 84". '/," 82 82 83, . 84 84 84 84 84• . 84. 15 85' 85 :' st 85 • • 'Class "A" on NO" Combustible Ducks, Class "8" on COrnbustibls Decks. SPECIFICATION CODE KEY BECK TYPE C— Structural Conciete W•— Nallable (wood, plywood, lightweight concrete, gypsum, cementat)ous wood fiber) OTHER CODES NC—Not Ciassifie SP••Super Ply UP —Ultra Ply IB— Insui.Base (venting base for use plastic foam Insulation) RI —Rigid Insulation (Fibergias, Perilta) 13 --Baas Sheet T —Rout Tape (for taping Insulation blots) over ...., -. -._._. 1 BeSco Roofing, Inc. 233 S. Holden, Seattle, WA 98108 • Phone (208) 783 -4706 RODE' 131D SPECIFICATIONS PRO FC T 734 Fletcher!' Fine Fcx,d. REROOF BUILDING 734 P 02 Be*a ROOF SYSTEM 5/14/86 1. Tea r off and Redeck Roof A. Remove northern most 20' of existing roof system - 1860 Sr. B. Remove southwest corner to existing roof system - 87651'. C. Replace removed root using the same material as specified above, bringing the surfeit's of the replacement up to the sane grade as the balance of the old roof. D. Clean -up and dispose: of demolished materials on a daily basis. 2. Irss3ta11 New Roofing A. Remove and set aside existing sheet metal edging for reuse. B. Clean existing roof surface, particularly at the perimeters. Apply asphalt pritlr in low areas to kill residual dust. C. Cut out wrinkles and blisters in the existing roofing. D. Mechanically fasten 1 ply of 28 lb. fiberglass base sheet. Hot mop 2 additional plies of Type IV fiberglass ply sheets and surface coat with emulsion applied at 11 per 100 square feet. Innerply rrxsppings of 1 the rate of 30 lbs. per 100 square feet per per 100 square feet. E. All perimeters will be reinforced with an a smooth surface cap sheet. F. Install sutticient roof system vents to all sy$tdm to escape.. • G. Reinstall sheet metal edging. H. This roof system is a Conglas Roof Specification No. ND- 24C -SS or equal. This is a 1.5 year Class a Roofing assembly. In ttll car s mechanical equipma that roofing may run continuously ;unfit I. A heavy bead of p: be applied around the base of each leaded or m after the new roof system is instal.]. 3. General iL.► �: �" nr1 % w t A. Provide 5 year war lair. v Ci• T B. The Contractor shall manage a safe job environment for the safety 0 1 rsona around the work site includi , but not limited to, f d1 pe pg workman. in addition, Contractor's safety program shall ensure the safety of the Owner's property. ,s. Commercial /Industrial Reroofing — Cold Application c n� ctra,, . ND -246 20 Years — U.L. Class A Slope Range; 0" to 3" no ••01 e, II,1.. 17 •OO,IIIO .4+W! sty.......w+y. dlOirie...•I+r►,.MR•M• Materials required per 100 square feet of roof area shall not be less than the following: Mechanical fasteners (1) as required Conbuse Typo W1 -IV 12) — 1 ply 2G lbs. Conply Type A•IV — 2 plies 22 Ibs. Asphalt* plies 60 Ibs. Asphalt" surface GO Ihs. uteveI Gr 400 lbs. Sian 300 Ibs. Accessories and flashing materials as required. 1'A,n+arferemamlrw ateprsA ... • ND-24C-SS ?0 Years — LfIL. CIaq C Sinpa Ranges 1/2" to 3" .onn Or t+l IwI I.,c., IO„. rn.vIIY •r Materials required per 100 square feet of roof area shall Elul be leas than the following: Mechanical i:Isomers (1) as required Conbase Type W1 -IV 121 — 1 ply 2b Ibs. Conply Type A•IV — 2 plies 22 Ibs. Asphalt• plies 60 Ibs. Asphalt' surface or 25 Ihs, Emulsion 3 pal. Accessories end (lashing materials as required. • P 03 APPLICATION ** THE ROOF PECK shall be firm, clean, dry arid smooth, CONDASE TYPE W -1 -IV shall he applied at right armlet; to continuous joints of surface to I,e roofed s and lapped so water flow is uver or parapet to, but never against, the !apt. It shalt be lapped 2" on sides and G" on ends and nailed on 9" centers through the laps and on 18" centers along Tines 12" distant from each edge. It shall be turned up 2" above the cant on all wails and vertical surfaces, CONPLY TYPE A•IV shall be applied parallel to the base sheet and lapped SO the flow of water is over or parallel to, but never against, the laps. All end laps shall be at least 4" and adjacent end laps shall be at least 12" apart, Embed two plies of Conply Type A -IV In shingle fashion, lapping 19 ", into uniform solid mopp(ngs of (101 asphalt. Embed the full width of 1•••' ' of 30 lbs, per 100 square moderately suit commerc up 2" above the top of th wall. Embed not less that feet per ply, Roofing she! foot or over, the ply sheet each sheet. VALLEYS Al which shall be et least 36" of the valleys, This ply sh (1) Refer paragraph 2.13 particular deck. (2) It is suggested that Co base sheet on nailable advantage of its ability from the deck, • Refer paragraph 2.1 of "General Requirements" for proper meirpoint of asphalt for slope involved, All application requirements from "General Requirements" section are considered pert of those specifications. w plied et a nominal rate 'roomer!, using a All plies shall be turned :d to the cant and vertical Af slag per 100 square deck. On slopes 2" per " from the back edge of an extra layer of Conply 8" up the inclines out on of the roofing plies. • proper fasteners for ;u of Type W -t•IV :k installations to take pressure coming up APPLICATION ** THE ROOF DECK shall be firm, clean, dry and smooth. CONIBASE TYPE W -1.1V shall be applied at riphl angles to continuous joints Of surface to be roofed and lapped so water flow is over or parallel l0, Out never against, the laps, It shall be tanned 2" on siries and 6" on ends and nailed on 9" centers through the laps and on 18" canters alums lures 17" distant from each odoe, It shall be turned ur, 2" above the rant on all walls end vertical surfaces. CONPLY TYPE A•IV shall he applied parallel to the base sheet and lapped so the flow of water is over or parallel to, hut never aguinst, the laps, All end laps shall be at least 4" and adjacent and laps shall be at least 12" apart. Embed two plies Of Conply Type A -IV in shingle fashion, lapping 19 ", into uniform solid moppinps of hut asuhtrlt, Embed the full width of each ply sheet in hot asphalt applied at a nominal rate of 30 lbs, per 100 square feat, Each ply shall be lightly brnomed, using a moderately soft commercial broom, as it is applied. All plies shall be turned up 2" above the top of the cant and shall he solid mopped to the cent and vertical wall. ON SLOPES EXCEEDING 1.1/2" per foot asphalt shall be applied at the nominal rate of 25 IN, per 100 square feet per ply. Roofing shall be applied Parallel to slope of neck. On slopes 2" per foot or over, the ply sheets shall be nulled to the duck 18" from the back edge of each sheet. VALLEYS AND WATERWAYS shell rccuivu an extra layer of Conply which shall be or least 36" wide and shall externd at least 8" use the inclines out of the valleys. This ply shall be laid prior to the application of the roofing plies. Coat entire surface with tntilorm solid mopping of hot asphalt, using not loss than 25 Ibs. our 100 square feet 01 Conceal CC-20 emulsion using not less than 3 gallons per 100 square feet. (1) Refer paragraph 2.13 of "General Requirements" for proper fasteners for Pat Ocular deck, Ir is suggested that Connie; Prebase may be used in Lieu of Type W1 -IV lase sheet on mailable ilghtwetnht poured-In-place deck rnstellalions to [eke advantage of its ability to disperse moist ule 01 vapor pressure coming up from the deck. Refer paragraph 2,i of "General Requirements" for proper meltpoint of asphalt for slope involved. All application requirements from "Cieneral Requirements" section are considered part of these Specifications, 12) ct Ie { y3� SECALAE BUSINESS P April 5, 1988 Mr. Duane Griffin Building Official CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 RE: Segale Business Park Building No. 734 Roof Dear Mr. Griffin: ffT3D7L iR G 1988 CITY OP TUKWILA ., Nn /ENG DEPT. I'd like to update you on the status of the above - referenced matter. In October of 1987 Segale Business Park agreed in writing that it would approve any "fix" for the Building 734 roof which meets the . following two criteria: 1) It must have the approval of the City of Tukwila, and any codes with which the City requires compliance; and 2) It must have the prior approval of our structural engineer, Dean B. Ratti (E.g. the building must be capable of supporting the fix without harming the structure, its ability to withstand snow load, etc.). In December of 1987, BeSco the roofer who last applied material to the Building 734 roof, proposed the application of pea gravel to the subject roof. We have attached a copy of Mr. Ratti's letter of December 29, 1987 analyzing this proposal and you will note that he did not approve same. At this time, BeSco has proposed the application of a different material. Once we have received specific information about this material, we will submit the proposed "fix" to Mr. Ratti for his analysis. P.O. BOX 88050 • TELEPHONE: (206) 575-3200o TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 In the meantime,: BeSco may contact you to evaluate this proposal in terms.of compliance with City of Tukwila 'standards. .You may wish to review ::your files /materials in preparation for this `contact,:and.we .will appreciate your .efforts in analyzing this second proposal. Very truly yours,,. SEGALE BUSINESS.PARK December 29, 1987 RATTI PERBIX CLARK Segale Business Park° P.O. Box 88050 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Ms. Ann J. Nichols Reference: Roof Structural Capacity Segale Building 734 Dear Ann: As you requested, we have reviewed the roofing specs and building plans you forwarded with your letter of 21 December, 1987. Our analysis indicates that the roof joists (2x4's @ the additional weight of gravel, based on the most criteria of L/ 180. We have also determined that 4x14 where they support the freezer roof panels would be addition of gravel would, therefore, diminish the requirement in at least the members noted above, and that does not conform , to the minimum requirements of We, therefore, recommend that you do not place gravel on If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please Very truly yours,. RATTI PERBIX & CLARK, P.S. Consulting �ngi neers 24 ") cannot support liberal deflection purl i ns in the area overstressed. The 25 psf snow load create .a condition the Building Code the roof. advise us.. TELEPHONE MEMO RE: nt. v7Q a'„ PERSON CONTACTED: ,1/ QJ?P,' PERSON CALLING: ffi5 PRviarc( 6-751- o 200 DATE: - - INFORMATION ITEMS: A ; /0- 0 T- ,74, ')/ I Y 5, C /e 91- Serial f�....P Ce.) 5 e.Q ill 4, U) CYQ' de (4, �t lQ( T' oi, ) P l rteto)4 AL. 0421.16/1/7/70 4i 44-62-01 , 7C( /Q I ge c O r eo ,7 0 i % 5-ke o.-?;c/ 4191 &5 Q ha 7-7,9-77„2,5-4(/ 401 /lLoy Ida" cI ce /- a ke oY .c 7- j,,,e crii fiLe /0,c9 o'.'71c( /1104 wGu Le* /' Pij c� i2 Y `i' re c QYcJ h 6w 2 ,4k Y) 6i cc( !� � 3 ki i ^00 W 0541 (? ' i' Q f \4 / •l • 2 O e c.Je, •' r1 / � r / t -r Q,5`& < 7,5 Pfr- ve+ ; 5-40 c©t.Jcf e You r`e�f / e & e x -' 7`" Yk /4041pr Nt 54e ,rqic' 5:4,e C.cic(iid, 6-I4 0150 5'0;d Ad 007l't acitt a “ct yam. , e ds r 27 J/7 5- r € c71 ct rR ( 4( GA cf. is )-c JJrU2c iU2 J 0 c-R,1(c4 10 c if Q ro-pbaar( •, (0. i X 0+ Zit Q 55 BeSco ROOfI 233 S. Holden, Seattle, WA 98108 • Phone (206) 783.4705 Mr. Griffiths City. of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila,Wa. 98108 Dear Mr. Griffiths, IDEC .14 117 ecember 1'1 c TY U!= TUKWILA PLANP,SUN(, DEPT. We BeSco Roofing Inc. Fletcher Meats Building I will notify the City when weather permits us to complete roof with gravel surface. are going ahead as.agreed, with the Segale &- It is our understanding that the application of meets the Spec. „ A" which exceeds the Spec: our, contract and permit. gravel on this.. roof B`" , required in .. Thank' :.You, cc: Chuck Meyers. Commercial/industrial Reroofing Cold Application INAitBAY ROOF INSPECN CONSULTANTS P.O Box 6159 Bellevue, Wa. 98008 December 3 1987 Jerry Mylan Besco Roofing, , Inc 233 South .Holden: Seattle, Wa. 98108 Re: Flectchers Fine: Foods,1B338 Andover Park. West in Tukwila Dear .Mr. Mylan, The roof specification that you contracted for with the `tennant was a Con -Glae ND -24 -SS which is only a Class C type roof. To make this a Class•A type roof the new Con -Glas roof specification number should be. VD -24 -G on page 68 of the 1986 manufactures book. To complete this .roof specification you will have to add pea gravel over the first three plies that you have installed. FROMM DEC 14 1987 EV Or TRW i LA PLANNING DEPT, can® a® ND -241 20 Yeah — U.L Clem A Slope Range: 0" to 3" 1. mailable decks OM SAVIIIIKIIIMAI wuvMrasir,r MOM roe *HY 1111111Plif INV • Materals requited per 100 aware tent of roof area • . shall net ba lsi then the follawissg , • Machanial fastsrars 111 M requhad Conbese Type W1 -IV 12) •1 PIT Conply Type A•IV — 2 plies , . • Asphalt* plies . • ' Asphalt' surface • Gavel or Slag �. Accessories and flashing maturials as required. 26 lbs. 221be. 60 lbs. 60 lbs. 400 lbs. 300 lbs. 'APPLICATION" THE ROOF DECK shall be firm, clean, dry and smooth: CONBASE TYPE W-1-IV shall be applied at right angles to continuous joints of surface to be roofed and lapped so water flow is over or parallel to, butnever against, the laps. It shall be lapped 2" on sides and 6" on ends and nailed on 9" antess through the Mgr • and on 18" centers along lines 12" distant from each page. It shall be turned up • 2" above the ant on all walls and withal Surfaces. CONPLY TYPE A -IV shall be applied wanes to the bass sheet and lapped to the flow of water 15 over or parallel to, but never against, the laps.. All end laps shall be at least 4" and adjacent and imps shall be et least 17." apart. Embed two plies of Conp1Y Type A -IV in shingle fashion, lapping 19'; into uniform solid mappings of hot asphalt. Embed the full width of such ply sheet in hot asphalt applied at • nominal rate of :30 lbs. per 100 square fast. Each ply shall be lightly broomed, using a • moderately soft commercial pushbroom, as it is applied. All plies shall be turned • up 2" above the top of the cant and shall be solid mopped to, the cant and vertic e • wall. Embed not lass than 400 lbs. of gavel or 300 lbs. of sag per 100 square fest par ply. Roofing shall be applied parallel to slop11 of deck. On slopes 2" Per foot or over, the ply sheets shall be nailed to the dsck.18" from the beck edge of • ands sheet. VALLEYS ANDWATERWAYS shall raaive an extra layer 01 ConPIY1. which shall beat least 38" wide•and shall extend at least 8" up the inclines out of the valleys. This ply shall trl-'trid prior to the application of the roofing plies. • 11) Refer,Peregraph 2.13 of "Gswral Requirements" for proper fastenea for • particular deck.. • , • • (2) • •It is suggssted that Conglss Prebass may bb wed M lieu of Type W-1-IV • bass sheet on nailable lightweight poured•in•pMa deck insulations to tab advantage of its ebility.to:dispern moisture or vapor pressure coming up • from the desk.' Roar paragraph 2.1 of," G.r»ral Raquinrnants" for proper maltpok►t of asphalt for slops inv0hird: '66 :All application nquiranianti from "General. Requirements" action ere Considered pert of.thoi rpseifjoetiorr. • INT RBAY ROOF INSPECAN CONSULTANTS P.O: Box 6159 Bellevue; Wa. 98008 June 18 1987 .1(IM1[ITEM ' ~Teleph ..J 01$0131498 CITY OF TUKWiLA PLANNING DEPT, Mr. Griffth City Of Tukwila 6200.Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Wa. 98108. Tukwila. Dear Mr. Griffth, As your request I am inclosing my, resume. I have been chairman of the committee that helped write the roofing manual for the National Roofing Contractors Association. This manual is I understand used by about 80% of the major roofing contractors and architects through out the united states. Musi1 Jr.: I N T E R B A Y R O O F I N S P E C T I O N C O N S U L T A N T S P.O. Box 6159 Bellevue, WA 98008 (206) 641 -2171 LAWRENCE T. MUSIL, JR. President I. offer a complete roof inspection service from specifications to on -site roof application inspections. Thirty -four (34) plus years as a trained roofing applicator to include 23 years as a major roofing contractor and roof consultant. Services include the following: 1. Completed roof application inspection with written reports. 2. Moisture roof test scans. 3. Roofing or re- roofing specifications for all types of buildings. ▪ Cost accounting for your complete job, including sheet metal work. • Inspection while your new roof is being installed. Hourly. - daily - as required. 6. Test plug laboratory testing. 7. Expert court witnesses. 8. Any areas throughout the U.S., including Alaska. 9. Act as agent for settlement through negotiation. 10. Approved American Arbitration Association arbitrator. A service for roofing contractors, architects, attorneys and owners of all types of buildings. . Page 2 • •LTM Resume • Formerly: Interbay Roofing Company, Inc. Performed contract completion on approximately 4,400 different types of roofing and sheet metal contracts. This includes specialty waterproofing and roof insulation work. Twenty -three years as roofing contractor doing commercial, industrial, government, state and local agencies. Work includes schools, colleges, Trident Naval Base, banks, Children's Orthopedic Hospital, K -Mart Stores throughout Washington, Oregon, Montana, Alaska, Idaho and Minnesota, and various other types of buildings. Formerly: Interbay Sheet Metal Corporation Served as President for approximately 6 years until closed, and sheet metal work was then performed through Interbay Roofing Company. Specialty was architectural sheet metal work for commercial and industrial buildings as outlined above. Both roofing and sheet metal corporations were operating at the same time. PAST EXPERIENCE: 1949 -1957 Two years roofing apprentice school. Worked as a roofer applying roofs, progressed through Superintendent, except for 2 years in the Merchant Marine and 2 years in the U.S. Army in Korea. 1958 -1981 • Owner and President of two corporations serving the roofing and sheet metal industry. Jobs located in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Minnesota, Montana and Alaska. OFFICES HELD: 1958 -1982 Served two -year term as President of Washington Roofing Contractors Association. Many years as a Director of Washington Roofing Contractors Association. This involved various other offices of this association. Thirteen years on Labor Negotiation Committee for Washington Roofing Contractors Association. Served eight years as Chairman of this committee. Six years (two 3 -year terms) as Director for National Roofing Contractors Association. Served as Chairman of Waterproofing Committee for five years. This committee wrote the new waterproofing manual which is being used now by roofing and waterproofing contractors throughout the United States. Architects are also using the manual as a guide for good roofing practices. ' 'Page 3 LTM Resume 1958 -1981 (Cont'd) 1980 -1981 1981 -1986 CONSULTING: Served on the Technical Assistance Program for five years for. the National Roofing Contractors Association. Also served on various other committees for this association. Speaker at Roofing Superintendents Conference for National Roofing Contractors Association. Speaker at Construction Specifiers Institute (CSI). Four years Treasurer of Condominium Association. Also served as head negotiator for this association to settle out -of -court settlement for construction defects. Acted as consultant for completion of repair work. Treasurer of Construction Industry Contractors (CIC) and Director for three years. Six years as Director of Western States Roofing Contractors Association. Served as President of Western States Roofing Contractors Association. Full time roofing, waterproofing, and sheet metal consultant; on -site roof application inspections; many court cases as an expert witness. Have performed consultant work for some of the following: Attorneys - as expert witness in court. Roofing contractors, architects, and owners throughout the United States. Different states and local area Attorney General's offices and the Seattle Times Troubleshooter column, as well as many other awarding authorities. • Have completed roofing specifications for architects, school districts, state agencies and contractors for many years. Roof application inspections for owners and national corporations throughout the United States. Work Area Proposed: Almost any state requires roofing inspection before, after roofing application. Serve as expert witness architects and contractors (roofing or otherwise) in waterproofing inspection. during, and and assist roofing and tee4?/(- .: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (208) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor NOTICE TO ALL ROOFING CONTRACTORS: For all reroofing and roofing projects that require a fire retardant roof covering under the provisions of Section 3202 (b), 1985 UBC, the Tukwila Building Department will require a written statement from the installer stating the following (or some- thing similar). This statement must be provided before or at the time of final inspection. I HAVE INSTALLED A ROOF MEMBRANE ASSEMBLY, INCLUDING INSULATION IF APPLICABLE, CONSISTING OF (Manufacturer)., SPECIFICATION # DATA SHEET ENCLOSED, WHICH MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR CLASS A OR CLASS B ROOFS. THIS ROOF, WAS INSTALLED AT (Address) UNDER CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING PERMIT NO. The statement will include the name of the roofing company that installed the roof, signature of installer, and date. • Be Sco Roofing, Inc. 233 S. Holden, Seattle, WA 98108 • Phone (206) 763-4705 Mr. Griffiths City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Wa. 98108 lnfdn_ JUN -5 1987 CITY OF TUKW LA PLANNING DEPT. Re: Fletchers Fine Foods, 18338 Andover Park West in Tukwila. Dear Mr. Griffiths, The roof specification the owner requested a bid on was a Con -Glas ND -24 -SS which I now understand is only a Class C roof covering. We completed this roof last year and the owner will not except the completed job until we coat the roof with 9 gallons of Con -Glas emulsion and 3 -lbs of chopped glass per square. After this has set install 1 gallon of BeSco aluminum per square. Please find the Con -Glas specification RI -24A -ECG which shows with this above top coating, that this roof covering should be a Class A. The roof slope is 0 -1/2 ". We are submitting this letter and information for your approval before we spend the large amount of funds out of our pocket just to complete our contract and resolve this problem for everyone. The owner has approved this work and I would like to get the city of Tukwila's approval in writing that this change would be approved by the city if this work was completed. We want to be assured before we start, that the city of Tukwila will accept this roof covering with these changes as meeting the city code. The city of Tukwila approved the origional roof covering specification on May 16th 1986 under the permit # 4324. This request was submitted without anyone knowing this specified roof was only a Class C. The above change should close out this outstanding problem. Commercial /Industrial Reroofing — Cold Application Page. 2. Thank you and if you have any further questions please . call myself or Lawrence T. Musil Jr., at Interbay Roof Inspection Consultants, 641 -2171. Please send y.our approval or remarks as soon as possiable. The owner has given us only a short time to complete this This problem has been outstanding for over year. Sincerely, cc: :'FletchersFine. Foods . Inc.:. 18338 Andover Pk. W..' P.O. Box 88337 Tukwila, Wa'' 98188 Att ::Morley: W. Jasman t >;T�KJw "9�i�3:,Ji1.r�Y �r �C" E ~ H� RI -24A ECG U. L. CLASS A /SLOPE RANGE: 0" to 1/2" insulated deck NOW "Mai • I,ON ONr I ArER COIIOI AS CONOASI NI ry CU4O5 AS L ONLRII A,1N I,l A55AIr41UR(rN, IrAl AS ' •5"•11 „ TWO LAYERSCONOLA% l'11N•,r AIV MATERIAL REQUIRED PER 100 SQUARE FEET OF ROOF AREA Approved Roof Insulation Conbase W1 IV, 1 ply Conply Type A•IV, 2 plies Asphalt, plies Concoal Emulsion 9 gal. Glass Fibers Co shtlSI"d Aluminum Coating gal. 7;'kiZc.0 Accessories and Flashing Materials as Required. Altatalitolikt CllAliNli U. L. insulated ( UN'.l a5 YU5 "CUN A,Nr1N5.11 AIiUN RI34A•ECG S AISLOPE RANGE: 0" to 1 /2" ONE COMM CONOI AS MALE LAVERS CONOL AS C0017 AIV APPLICATION ** WOOD INSULATION STOPS, the same lhickness'as the insulation, shall be installed at the edges of tho dock and at all projections through the deck...curbs, pipes, etc. These stops shall be 6" wide or one (1) inch wider than Ilanges being nailed to them. THE ROOF DECK shall be firm, clean, dry and smooth during the epplicalion of insulation, BUR and all other materials. ROOF INSULATION shall be applied In approved manner wilh joints In the long dimension of the board con- tinuous and joints in the short dimension of the board staggered a1 least 24 ". Insulation shall be properly fabricated to fit around protections. Broken edges or excessive gaps shall be properly filled to provide a uniform surface for the BUR. CONBASE W1 IV shall be applied at right angles to the continuous joints of the surface to be roofed. Con- base W1 IV shall be lapped 2" on sides and 6" on ends. Lap so the flow of water is over or parallel lo, but 1 never against, the laps. Turn up 2" above top of cant on all walls and vertical surfaces. Embed the full width of each sheet in lull uniform moppings of hot asphalt applied at a nominal rate of 30 lbs. per 100 sq. ft. CONPLY A•IV shall be lapped so the flow of water is over or parallel lo, but never against, the laps. All end laps shall be at least 4" and adjacent end laps shall be at least 12" apart. EMBED two (2) plies Conply A•IV in shingle fashion, lapping 19" with a 17" exposure. EMBED the lull width of each sheet in hot asphalt applied at a nominal rate of 30 lbs. per 100 sq. ft. of root area. Each ply shall be lightly broomed, using a moderately soft commerclal push broom, as it is applied. All plies shall be turned up 2" above the cant and shall be solid mopped to the cant and vertical wall. Buckles or lishmouths shall be cut and repaired properly. THE SURFACE to receive coaling shall be clean, uniform, smooth, and dry. All lishmouths, buckles or dry laps shall be properly repaired prior to applying coating. COAT THE ENTIRE SURFACE with Concoat (plain) emulsion applied at a minimum rate of nine (9) gallons per 100 sq. II. of roof area. Chopped fiber glass roving shall be simultaneously embedded in the emulsion at a minimum rate of three (3) lbs. per 100 sq. It. ALUMINUM COATING shall be applied in strict compliance with manufacturer's recommendations and applied al a minimum rate of one (1) gallon per 100 sq. It. of roof area. VALLEYS/WATERWAYS shall receive an extra layer of Conply A•IV which shall be at least 38" wide. It shall ex- tend at least 8" up inclines out of valleys. This ply shall be laid on top of base sheet prior to application of other plies. Embed the lull width of each sheet in a uniform mopping of hot asphalt applied at a nominal rate of 30 lbs. per 100 sq It. of root area. ON SLOPES exceeding 1-1/2" per loot hot asphalt shall be applied at a nominal rate of 25 lbs. per 100 sq. It. of roof area. All BUR shall be applied parallel to the slope of deck. On slopes 2" per loot and greater the ply sheets shall be "back-nailed" to the deck or wood nailers (on Insulated specifications) per the following schedule: Ply Sheets Nall these Distances From Back edge 2 18" 3 12" 4 18" Concap shall be back nailed with two (2) rows nails staggered 3" o.c. OPTION: The above specification may be applied with cold process adhesive by effecting the following Substitutions' 1. Substitute 3 gallons Conhesivo per 100 sq.'11. vs. 30 lbs. hot asphalt. 2. Substitute Conbase W -1 IV as a ply sheet wherever Conply A•IV Is required. • Refer to section 2.15, page 18, for proper melt point of asphalt for slope Involved. •• ALL application requirements from the "General Requirements" section are considered part of these specifications. APPLICATION ** • WOOD INSULATION STOPS, the same thickness as the insulation, shall be installed at the edges of t• : deck and at all projections through the deck.. curbs, pipes, etc. These stops shall be 6" wide or one (1) it wider than flanges being nailed to them. THE ROOF DECK shall be firm, clean, dry and smooth during the application of insulation, BU' : nd all other materials. ROOF INSULATION shall be applied In approved manner with joints in the long dimensio the board con. sinuous and joints in the short dimension of the board staggered at least 24 ". Insulation I be properly fabricated 10 lit around projections. Broken edges or excessive gaps shall be properly '„ :d to provide a uniform surface for the BUR. MOH ital. I U41.IA5(10N, NAI h,I„ *1UM11,04 1,1 A55NI"N 1111 041.11111115 IIIAIINI, MATERIAL REQUIRED PER 100 SQUARE FEET OF ROOF AREA Approved Roof Insulation Conbase W1 IV, 1 ply Conply Type A•IV, 3 plies Asphalt*, plies Concoat Emulsion, 9 gal. Glass Fibers Conshietd Aluminum Coaling, 1 gal. 100 sq. ft. 25 lbs. 33 lbs. 120 lbs. 72 lbs. 3 lbs. 8 lbs. Accessories and Flashing Materials as Required. CONBASE W -1 IV shall be applied at right angles to the continuous joints of the ace to be roofed. Con - base W -1 IV shall be lapped 2" on sides and 8" on ends. Lap so the flow of w: 'Is over or parallel lo, but never against, the laps. Turn up 2" above top of cant on all walls and vertical *faces. Embed the lull width of each sheet in full uniform moppings of hot asphalt applied at a nominal r7 . of 30 lbs. per 100 sq. fl. CONPLY A -IV shall be lapped so the flow of water is over or parallel to, • 'never against, the laps. All end laps shall be at least 4" and adjacent end laps be at least 12" apart. EMBED Three (3) plies Conply A•IV in shingle fashion, lapping 24.3 j ith a 11-1/2" exposure. EMBED the lull width of each sheet in hot asphalt applied at a n•, nal rate of 30 Ibs. per 100 sq. It. of roof area. Each ply shall be lightly broomed, using a moderately sof ,Xmmercial push broorn, as it is applied. All les shall be turned up 2" above the cant and shall be solid ., %pped to the cant and vertical wall. Buckles or ouths shall be cut and repaired properly. THE "5 FACE to receive coating shall be clean, unlfor , "mooth, and dry. All lishmouths, buckles or dry laps sha roporly repaired prior to applying coatin COAT THE E"L,,LE SURFACE with Concoat (plain) lsion applied at a minimum rato of nine (9) gallons per O0t sq. f rate of t.. .Chopped oedr11 fiber glass s rovin• all be simultaneously embedded in the emulsion at a h:: applied In 51,1 ALUMINUM COATING s at a minimum rate of one (1) VALLEYSIWATERWAYS shall recel tend at least 8" up inclines out of vel other plies. Embed the lull width of of 30 lbs. per 100 sq. It. of root er ON SLOPES exceeding 10/2" • . oot hot asphalt of rool area, All BUR shall be •plied parallel to the e sheets shall be "back•nalle•' /o the deck or wood nailers schedule: Ply Sheets Nall th Distances From Sack edge 2 18" 3 12" 4 18" Concap shall • ,ack nailed with two (2) rows nails staggered 3" oc. OPTION: T , above specification may be applied wilh cold process adhesive by effect e following substituli 1. Su • Lute 3 gallons Qonhesivo per 100 sq. II. vs. 30 lbs. hot asphalt. 2. .stituto Conbase W1 IV as a ply sheet wherever Conply A•IV Is required. star to section 2.15, page 18, for proper melt point of asphalt for elope Involved ALL application requirements from the "General Requirements" section are considered pert of these specifications. ompliance with manulacturer's recommendations and applied per 100 .. It. of roof area. layer of Conply A•IV which shall be at least 36" wide. 11 shall ex• his ply shall bo laid on lop of base shoal prior to application of e , In a uniform mopping of hot asphalt applied at a nominal rale be applied at a nominal rale of 25 lbs. per 100 sq. ft. of deck. On elopes 2" per foot and greater the ply sulated specifications) per the following • BeSco Roofing, Inc. 233 S. Holden, Seattle, WA 98108 • Phone (206) 763.4705 CITY OF TUKWILA APPROVED MAY 1 61996 t6 MILD BUILDING DIVISI iN REROOF BUILDING 734 1. Tear off and Redeck Roof A. Remove northern most 20' of existing roof system - 1860 SF. B. Remove southwest corner to existing roof system - 876SF. C. Replace removed roof using the same materials as specified above, bringing the surface of the replacement up to the same grade as the balance of the old roof. D. Clean -up and dispose of demolished materials on a daily basis. ROOF BID SPECIFICATIONS PROJECT 734 Fletchers Fine Foods 14, .fe,6(11:$, .CC-, a g (. l; ti me 4 ?-fie/91 5/14/86 2. Install New Roofing A. Remove and set aside existing sheet metal edging for reuse. B. Clean existing roof surface, particularly at the perimeters. Apply asphalt primer in low areas to kill residual dust. C. Cut out wrinkles and blisters in the existing roofing. D. Mechanically fasten 1 ply of 28 lb. fiberglass base sheet. Hot mop 2 additional plies of Type IV fiberglass ply sheets and surface coat with emulsion applied at the rate of 3 gallons per 100 square feet. Innerply mappings of hot asphalt will be at the rate of 30 lbs. per 100 square feet per ply for a total of 60 lbs. per 100 square feet. E. All perimeters will be reinforced with an additional ply of 40 lb. smooth surface cap sheet. F. Install sufficient roof system vents to allow moisture from old system to escape. G. Reinstall sheet metal edging. H. This roof system is a Conglas Roof Specification No. ND- 24C -SS or equal. This is a 15 year Class B Roofing assembly. In all cases mechanical equipment will be raised such that roofing may run continuously under all such equipment. I. A heavy bead of plastic roof cement shall be applied around the base of each leaded or unleaded metal projection after the new roof system is installed. 3. General A.. Provide 5 year warranty on labor and materials. B. The Contractor shall manage a safe job environment for-the safety of all persons around the work site including, but not limited to, workmen. In addition, Contractor's safety program shall ensure the safety of the Owner's property. Commercialllndustrial Reroofing — Cold Application 1 BeSco Roofing, Inc. 233 S. Holden, Seattle, WA 98108 • Phone (206) 763 -4705 REROOFING BUILDING 734 Iieticu ROOF SYSTEM page 2 'C. Debris shall not be allowed to remain around the buildings during performance of work, but shall be disposed of on a daily basis. On completion of work, the buildings and grounds shall be left in a neat, clean condition acceptable to the Owner. D. Extreme care shall be used to prevent asphalt material from making contact with or resting or remaining on eaves, facia boards, any painted or stained surfaces, brick walls, sidewalks, lawns, shrubs, etc., and the Contractor shall be responsible for the cleaning of any such surface and restoring the area to its prior condition. E. No material shall be applied when moisture can be dectected on the roof or when moisture can be detected on any materials to be installed on the roof. 4. Miscellaneous Roofing Items A. All conduit support blocks shall be replace with Wolmanized 2x4 blocks cut of the same size and shape. If additional blocks are required to properly support the conduit, they shall be installed. The conduit shall be securely fastened to each support block. B. New pipe leads shall be installed replacing the existing leads. C. Four mechanical unit supports need to be secured, canted, flashed and a metal cap installed. The support shall be properly secured to the deck. After a two inch cant has been installed around each support and flashing is completed in accordance with the specifications, a galvan- ized metal cap shall be installed between the mechanical unit and each support. The mechanical unit shall be properly secured through the metal cap to the support. D. There are two 4x4's approximately twelve feet long supporting an internal cooking system. The Tenant has stated that they will be replaced with new treated wood. The new supports are to be properly flashed using two inch cants and the specified flashing procedures. 5. City Engineering Review The Tukwila Building Department will require that an engineer inspect the building or drawings to determine whether these buildings will support the extra weight of the new built -up roofing applied over the existing built -up roofing. Report cost shall be paid by Tenant. 6. Building Permit Cost Cost of plan check and building permit fees shall be paid by Tenant. 7. After making repairs to the existing roof surface called for in the specifications, the new roofing application can successfully be installed without adverse effects to its serviceable life resulting from the existence of the present roof surface. Commercial /Industrial Reroofing -- Cold Application HOOF SYSTEM 233 S. Holden, Seattle, WA ..98108: • Phone (206) 763- 4705 .REROOFING BUILDING 734 page 3 BeSco Roofing, - Inc: agrees to indemnify and save harmless the owner, its officiers, agents, and employees, and Fletcher's Meats, from and against any and all suits, claims, losses, costs, penalties, and damages, of whatsoever kind or nature, including attorney's fees, . arising out of, in connection with, or incident to BeSco Roofing, Inc. 's, performance of this contract. In the event that the Tenant vacates the building prior to the expiration of the warranty, all rights under that warranty shall extend to the owner. BeSco Roofing• , Inc. 233 S. Holden, Seattle, WA 98108 • Phone (208) 783.4705 REROOF COST ELEMENTS 1. Tear Off and ReDeck Roof 2. Install New Roofing 3. Miscellaneous Roofing Items 4. City Engineering Review 5. Building Permit Cost 6. Lifting The Roof Top Mechanicals PAYMENT SCHEDULE: $ 4,950.00 14,250.00 1,450.00 by Tenant by Tenant 350.00 $21,000.00 1,659.00 tax - $22,659.00 One third down payment and the, balance upon completion of work. All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be ooatplsMd In a wodullen Nre manner according to standard practices. Any aNaratlon 01 *Motion from ebow specifications involving extra costs will be executed only upon wtiden orders, and MN become an extra charge aver and above the estivate. AN egreemenM coMineent upon strikes, accidenta or delays beyond our control. Owner 10 carry Mrs, tornado end oNler necessary Insurance. Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's ColftWINISIon Insurance. Authaind Signatun Note: p a This propose boy be w N not mope a within Acceptance of Proposal — Ths wore prk;ee, ep.cfcdtons and conditions are satiefa tory Ind are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of Acceptance 81pMttxe Commercial /Industrial Reroofing - Cold Application • g. 7?.7-, 2:45 lkY 0 KT H 1",■••■•••••■■ 1 I 1 • : ! • • , • • CVH i lob ) CITY OF TUKWILA APPROVED MAY 1 6 1986 twit!) BUILDING DIVISION FILE COPY I understand that the pthni check 'aliprovals subject to errors and omissions and approval plans oes not authorize the violatic-i Of any adopted code or ordinance. Receipt ofcontra copy of approved plans acknowledged. By.. of tor's ,• ! • '17. • i , I ' 3 LA} (o/Z/ilL 1: „. -. CITY OF TUKWILA r .' ?t 6200 southcenternBoulevard BUIL : ING PERMIT APPLIC)'�'° -ION �7 y Tukwila, Washington 98188 s Control # •0 (206) 433 -1845 iL CAL53'CW 3 Site Address L-o- 17l oCk -1- North of )47,A- 4 Suite# Floor# Project Name /Tenant Valuation of Construction 16;000 Assessors Account# Property Owner „lames M. 14d t- /&ru.a.. L...aK5e-r rhone�7g -83&'l /A44 -6137 Address .✓1010 •-00- / tie-3. `;e.& iUIr ggrtg u4,70q- ,31 -s, 0238 6eCi Zi �pp App i cant 5o rn e a `3 O / E.. Phone Address Zip Architect /Engineer Phone Address Zip Contractor Oki, A er/A- ppl icam ” Li cense# Phone 7g— 3 7 Address ; M -q -0,0e ,S, 5 emile.) von 444— Zip c I q g ) Class of Work: ❑ New ❑ Addition ❑ Tenant Improvement ❑ Remodel (residential) ❑ Reroof r ❑ Demolition ❑ Interior Demolition r2ktherRe.,c 4i. HO1'1 04L Wilt `e. Fut1111' Describe work to be done UC IC) ernen-� - f-vt�..n C.t.-{"i0h., CM.�ppn �1-r "i1 r�o-j.� r��1; h(� � g� J /� i .�v^� ��TT o PIacc rnen� ..1- l:V�t Iei1IUl1 �i1 6,i►1 �.e Rri'1L 1 tcle,ice. Type o f Const. (UBC) Occ. Grady (UBC) Square footage of entire building 014a Square footage of tenant space 01/31- Building Use S\ 11 E' Farm yiL 1, esiderc e . Will there be a change of use? ❑ Yes (2 If yes, describe c ange of use,Jincluding square footages of changed areas OA- Will there be storage or use of flammable, combustible or hazardous materials on the premise or area of construction? ❑ Yes No If yes, explain I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT AND THAT I HAVE THE PROPERTY OWNER'S AUTHORIZATION TO DO THIS WORK. Applicant /Authorized Agent (signature) ",e - *) /rl i i. Date ��Q%1,� --� (print na .�"a-rn es M . N[ e C r c) �" �/ Contact Person (please print),loane3 M , MGtx1'e 1 'Phone 1 cgI%g-�g / ) OFFICE USE ONLY SavtLJ& (AO: 6,23 -Iboo 6xT. o FEES: Building Permit Fee (000/322.100) $ 1(p ,(Y1) Receipt# 2° 3 Date Paid 6_0.(( -Y7 Plan Check Fee (000/345.830) Receipt #(f j--; Date Paid ✓ Bldg Code Sur Charge (000/386.904) .50 Receipt# VA.:- 9'- Date Paid (,-..2Y-1.3 Energy Sur Charge* (000/386.907) /5,erp Receipt# .)-,,-; Date Paid (a-2.(1-j7 Other ( ) Receipt# Date Paid *New construction only TOTAL( (OWES: $ /-7/).'5.-D ) SQUARE FOOTAGE /BUILDING USE INFORMATION Square Footage of Entirq Buildina; FLOOR USE /Occ Type SQ.FT. OC1;' LOAD USE /Occ Type SQ.FT. OCC LOAD. USE /Occ Tvoc SO.FT. OCC roan TOTAL SQ.FT. TOTAL OCC. TOTAL TRACKING � OMMENTS BLDG Approved for Issuance ype of onst. \\ , 4 il3 1„..„4 tl (a u. ea_ ib sow- - g To a ahan: Date Approve d: FIRE Per letter dated Approved nas Fire Protection: • Sprinklers 0 Detectors PING VS (.� ` \' ,� �� r \ A \' G1 Approve.' n i ti al s /% 0:1' 0 'I I U • , Zoning x"1-7 Set ac s: N 'rsr ' S 7.S ' E 1 0 W 2C0 Parking stalls required for: Site a, Tenant Space Parking stalls provided: Site Tenant Space ADDITIONAL PARKING STALLS REQUIRED: I�GC �� ( ;rte 0-5-1 GG Q/��� 1C Wi'Si ()Y7 Approved Per letter /pl ns dated PWD 5 jj 6` k'? �n'(Ini'ials)rf,� 1106 MOON m�( $9j,(' t?tu1� 0).40 a , CITY OF TUKWILA 1, Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1845 BUILDING PERMIT PERMIT # 4/7 c. Control # 87 -030 Work to be done House Relo ation Site Address 14264 53rd Avenue S. SuitE. # Tenant McGregor / Larsen Building Use Resid nrP Assessors Account # O7(p1?Q -0OO Property Owner James M. McGregor /Sonya Larsen Phone # $7$8187 / Z4 b 3/ Address 21010 9th Avenue S. Seattle /16704 31st S. #238, Seatt1 ip 9818E7-- Contractor Owner/Applicant Phone # 878 -8387 Address /'. Zip FOR BUILDING PERMIT ONLY Approved for Issuance • /; / ��,(,,,,,, Fees ' sq. ft. @ sq. ft. @ sq. ft. @ sq. ft. @ ......� ,.�......�..�..� a ...,r Sq. Ft. Ts tom. Office La °mouse Retail Other Occ. Load 2042 R -3 2nd F1. Total Fire Protection: [J Sprinklers J Detectors Zoning Type of Construction Special Conditions 1st Fi. $ 2nd Fi. $ other $ other $ Total valuation of Construction $ 16.090 Bldg. Permit Fee Plan Chock Fee Demolition Surcharges Other Other Receipt #jG•35 $ Receipt # 6695 $ Receipt # $ Receipt #.Q5 $ Receipt # Receipt # $ 162.00 105.00 i5 Q T0TAL $ 1 FOR SIGN PERMIT ONLY Permanent J Temporary J Single Face J Double Face [0 Wall Mounted 0 Free Standing Q Other Building face Setbacks: Front Square Footage of each sign face Special Conditions Side Side Rear Total square footage of sign THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 1.80 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 100 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK 1S COMMENCED. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW TILE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DUES NOT PRESUME TU GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE � CANCEL THE P.OV151�� ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION FR�l�N,E OF CONSTRUCTION. LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION 1 hereby affirm that I am licensed under provisions of On Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and effect. Contractor (signature) Date OWNER - BUILDER DECLARATION 1, as owner of the property, or my employees, with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or li offered for sale ( ) 1, as owner of tfte property, am exc ! l ive) c ntractin with licensed contractor's to con trust the project. Owner (signature) rK Date_ C��7l V City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary 1. VanDusen, Mayor February 24, 1987 Sonya Larsen Larsen / McGregor 2110 9th Avenue S. Seattle, WA 98148 RE: Preliminary House Move Inspection Dear Ms. Larsen: le, Jo 75.6/7q ( In accordance with Sec. 104(e), Uniform Building Code, 1985 Edition, and Sec. 16.04.100, Tukwila Municipal Code, an inspection was made on February 13, 1987 of a house located at 1608 - 133rd, Seattle. The purpose of the inspection was to determine if the house met the requirements of the above referenced codes to the extent that it could be relocated to the City of Tukwila. The following are the results of that inspection: It was indicated by the prospective owner that the front porch and fireplace will not be moved to the new location. It is proposed to heat the .house with a forced air, gas furnace. The installation of a new furnace will require applicable mechanical and plumbing permits. The flooring in the area of the bathroom will have to be replaced. The underfloor crawl space area and the attic space will be required to be insulated to comply with the 1986 Washington State Energy Code. The bedroom windows will have to be lowered to comply with Sec. 1204, Uniform Building Code. Smoke detectors will be required in accordance with Sec. 1210(a), Uniform Building Code. If the house is moved to Tukwila, a separate building permit will be required for construction of the foundation. At that time a complete underfloor framing plan will be required to determine the adequacy of the existing floor joists and location of new foundation and support posts. At the time the foundation permit is applied for, the application will be routed through appropriate !J: departments to check for zoning, setback and other applicable requirements.. It is suggested that you make contact with the City Planning and Public Works Departments, in advance of any final action to move the house, to ensure the adequacy of the lot and public utilities. If you should have any further questions on this subject, please feel free to call me at 433 -1851. Si yi erely, , Get/ riff Gri uane riff Building Official CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWJLA, {VASHINCTON 98188 PHONEY (2061 433.1800 Coy L. 1 anDosru, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: X11 -'�.: ��MIT 4'1q l AlZ6 c.,GM 01-- r FROM: ` 40 DATE: 1/1(/9 SUBJECT: ` ESD kcv1 O to AQpg O V E cXbkws, 0 Sez AS Orts10 5 c4At4G0) l 1-ij26 16 `RE-01(- 'TjatAi t06- 6i,P tG r viAitJt Ao.,(ss Nowt) cto i ►s -Op{cicottur Tuitr-Act\vi 6.)ecevet\tr61441\icco ss as 449eaocia vt6444s1 taw E.66N T'E 6)6CV4mf, cF AIL fo.t\l5 Ar07) A- Had (coal Lke2 tqc, C.mm 'D ANTE q- 1- i 1 ZE.ce: i p t -0•0/ INSPECTION RECORD Retain -a copy-wlth permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 r —S .1 ype o n _ ��4i Address'l Dete Called: Special at 45,:: f 00 714, 9 3 0 Date wanted: ,...9� p.m. Requester: Phone No.: Approved per applicable codes. ❑ Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: ' /.) ' ■ ,/ . i4 ❑ $30.00 REINSPECTION F REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. Dal INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit INSPEC110N NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 Frojad: I�/�Sa>7 7 ; Type of Inspection: , ' / Address: ,� ■ Date Called: + /�, 3 1°' 913 ) SpecW Instructions:. Date Wanted: Requester: i4 IJo Mai Mai .: p V‘? .. $42Q) - ❑ Approved per applicable codes. ❑ Corrections re u d priory to approval. ❑ $30.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 South:enter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. C INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 Project: / G.� Type of Inspection: T^ SL./of / 7x des i�r - Address: J� Dade Called:(6 l ,s Special Instructions Date Wanted: Requester: Phone No.: Approved per, applicable codes. COMMENTS: ' nspector: 0 Corrections required prior to approval. 0 ;30.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. [H�COA No.: Dale: .rte•.. , _.. �.. �. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 Proj 'A S p � ` �'� ✓P7 be: `. lype . ra,, ' �r�estsp � j G, �� � f�� c 11 -Vg' v ) date Called: / w � _ �_ edal Insttrructi s {3c;a - 7-'DNM VJiil ma i' �(tr►t cAl i Wilt: .'0l1 Or T, 30 Ant n \tz s'. cxa _ 4Z -' U ZIo� Date Wanted:(v %"� (� _ I j 92- `+j P.m. Requester: c„ Pbne No,: a'/ ^' �: � % d r_�.Od 54. .Approved per applicable codes. ❑ Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: ' Ci6- t on 4./ J.--e-e../ 1 3° ,, 4- 4Z/z., 0 42,2€45, 6,1,,E J4 P4, // 3 Inspector ❑ . $30.00 REINSPECTIO FEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. CITY OF TUKWILA De f Co j unity 6 went - Bulking DJvlslon 6300 Southcenter Boulevard - #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 PROJECT: A//, -; .-r.., --- `. re F-- c_1T7 PERMIT NO. 4? 91 DATE CALLED: SITE ADDRESS: TYPE OF INSPECTION: DATE WANTED: . D . M SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: REQUESTER: _PHONE NO.: INSPECTION RESULTS/COMMENTS: �. G/ __...4.10, MI _ mi /t/l ,��� INSPECTOR: DATE: -_ /7/. _c 7 . ynuurer! SL�YaanL�iti�lesu3e�G /NSrziveh.�rr A�i�bldWSitlHVIANtfetNaMtCN11 4.atofitlAunow5mmui6'7d1 2e tJ!gld CITY OF TUKWILA BuildfM9epartment 6300 ".ncent.r Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 INSPECT ON RECORD PERMIT # C Date `E' 1 5' q D Type of Inspection koU'.Q_, c• 1 QW" Uff, Date Wanted ----'"" a.m. p.m. Site Address I o 0 - ' 1 N . , Project itylc re or Lay .er) Requestor 3' OY`1 0`. LW-S.21-1— C 6 c rPhone # C6-145— 1 Special Instructions Inspection Results /Comments: 30ria 0. Lor Qr 1 "IY1LzribO Of C&mQ 11x1 C nr VAf Cerned. nne., WOr n nano__ rn► don z, b� (2k1f .1-e-SZ?h;0-1120ai BOLD inspeetar Date �- "Utz CITY OF TUKWILA Bu i l d?,Department 6300 `.hcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 Type of Inspection e /-77,,,/i,„_,) �--� Site Address / Z INSPECTION RECORD PERMIT # 4/7 C// Date Date Wanted (p-- ? —lG a.m. p.m. Project Requestor Phone # .Special Instructions Inspection Results /Comments: QI/"411.L -r /M:2, se.S 6 Inspector Date Cit Oof Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 May 4,` 1989 Sonya Larsen 16704 -.31st South, #238 Seattle, Washington 98188 Dear Ms. Larsen: This letter is to inform you that your Building Permit #4791 (House Relocation) at 14264 - 53rd Avenue South, Tukwila, WA 98188 is expired per Section 303(d) of the Uniform Building Code. Your last inspection -was August 29, 1988. More than 180 days have passed without an inspection and we assume that work on this has been abandoned. If you contact the Building Department at 433 -1852 by May 28, 1989 your permit may be extended for an additional 180 days. Thank you, Norm Bray, Building Inspector nb /wb Z cc: file k°9 es . elkamaLtoimts;emsorgtavotai‘roatesorrsuAiguag zrari+rm.cmia arrr matiWor V tifiWA'hsdaeiVict IWI if CITY OF TUKWILA. Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Type of Inspection 37 C Site Address ',/4/..,/ 5725 3 ;.4 INSPECTION RECORD PERMIT # Date oc %T Date Wanted .2(f/8 a.m. p.m. Project /7c `eyo4- /.�aJ -,g- Requestor Phone # S7Y— F3 S7 Special Instructions Inspection ,b4be, Results /Comments: Coal /al T47 h•'Fr c2G� /� /1.014 /I (%(7UG'3�1f " '`.4„:.d?>% Inspector Date 4fr7 CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Type of Inspection /lot Site Address /e- / c( 5 3 c/e So, Requestor Special Instructions Mv5e m0r/t INSPECTrN RECORD. PERMIT # 97f/ Date y % / /g1( Date Wanted y /1/ 0, Project I%6 hesfoille91 -50ti, Phone # a.m. P.m. Inspection Results /Comments: Inspector , rt"141 - -''"'� Date 1k/, ' ; CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division 6200 Southc.ntar Boulevard Tukwila, Washlnoton 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Type of Inspection Site Address Requestor Special Instructions INSPECN RECORD PERMIT # Date l0 /, Date Wanted /j1 a.m. Project aa6i rg r: Phone # 7I/7.72L Inspection Results /Comments: fet.4. . Date /02/Ar7 CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Type of Inspection Site Address Requestor Special Instructions 'Y2 6 _ J'. INSPECT .f„ N 'RECORD PERMIT # ''S/' /// Date /6 —b - 2e7 Date WantedObeet (/ 4 7 a.m p.m. Project )41c' -, 7j — l Phone # / C �4 �%L2•tie it d e ci?> A- �!.2 4.c} Jt Inspection Results /Comments: Inspector Date 49/,/2`7 CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division 6200 Southcent.r Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 . i61 -� ..� Date Wanted awe Site Address / s► 61/(4 Project ,il /r! /5()). 52..../ Requestor AA 1 d. 4g. Phone # ' ' 3 - / 0 Special Instruc,ions /g/e /Qirn P A.,;/ - i:/tIPA- 7 a C/a- *'," ".5 d INSPECT PERMIT # Date N RECORD Type of Inspection (' .9-y rob - .m. Inspectioon Results /Comments: 4.1-4 ir 9 Inspector /1.6' a; � Date PLAN CHECK NUMBER 031) ROUTING ROUTING UTILITY PROJECT C TRACKING .f'IECKLIST PROJECT NAME rYYA C- G r-ey 0r / Lawn Oirr■ SITE ADDRESS , L SUITE NO. DATE PLANS RECEIVED TYPE OF REVIEW DATE ROUTED TO PWD DATE PLANS APPROVED DATE RESUB. REQUESTED COMMENTS PERMITS REQUIRED lir PERMITS PERMIT NUMBER APPROVED PLAN /LETTER DATE ISSUED Channelization/Striping /Signing X Curb Cut / Access /Sidewalk CCRf--oN -Cti_ (9-a3`ds-? 5 -30-q.) Fire Loop /Hydrant Flood Zone Control Grade /Fill Hauling Landscape Irrigation Moving an Oversized Load Sanitary Side Sewer ',5- 0,9A Iseg (o -a3 "mil -frair T$ Sewer Main Extension (private) Sewer Main Extension (public) X Storm Drainage 5b -1`)a- q1 to'-a3-61 ( o-L i_a I Water Main Extension (private) Water Main Extension (public) ODeduct Water Meter (exempt) size: No.: OWater Only X Water Meter (permanent) Size: No.: 1 (k) m-r P ooti % (.0- a3--c1 I -5- %9 Water Meter (temporary) Size: No.: Other: Other: CONDITIONS OF PERMIT ISSUANCE OR FINAL SIGN -OFF OF PROJECT fr UTILITY PERMI' y APPLICATION CITY OF TUKWILA Central Permit System - Engineering Division 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206) 433 -0179 PLAN CHECK NUMBER: Site Address: /L/ 67 6 NFORMATION Name of Pro ect: Property Owner: • " Stree ay.0 % Engineer: Street Address: Contractor: TY/% Street Address: King County Assessor Account Number: Phone No.: 7 ?— r3?-7 City /State /Zip: SC/fA.. 4 w%, Phone No.: City /State /Zip: Phone No.: 7 71-/- V6 8 7 City /State /Z1 RMITS ❑— c nelization/Striping/Signing U.ESTED' >> Curb Cut/Access/Sidewalk • ❑ Are Loop/Hydr. (main to vauf) — No.: Sizes: ❑ Flood Zone Control ❑ Grade/Fill cubic yards ❑ Hauling ❑ Landscape Irrigation ❑ Moving an Oversized Load ❑ Sanitary Side Sewer — No.: ❑ Sewer Main Extension Private El Pudic ❑ ❑ Storm Drain ❑ Street Use ❑ Water Main Extension Private ❑ Public ❑ ❑ Water Meter / Exempt: — No.: — Sizes* Deduct ❑ Water Only ❑ ❑ Water Meter / Permanent — No.: — Sizes:. ❑ Water Meter / Temporary: — No.: — Sizes• ❑ Other: >WATER<:ME �D.EPQ81Tl: >; REFUND/SnitNI :MONTHLY SERVICE < > >> << ><< BILLINGS! TO:'; ❑ Water ❑ Sewer ❑ Metro ❑ Standby ...::.:.:.: .:...... ::.:.....:::.....:..::: ...:...::......:: . .DESCRIPTION € >OF PROJECT Name: Street Name: Street Phone No.: City /State /Zip: Phone No.: City /State/Zip: Lingle- Family Residential ❑ Multiple - Family Dwelling ❑ Hotel No. of Units: ❑ Motel ❑ Duplex ❑ Tri • lex ❑ Warehouse ❑ Manufacturing ❑ Remodel/ Addition ❑ Commercial/Industrial ❑ Office ❑ Retail MISCE1LANEOU E] New Building Square INFQRMATlON> ! Footage: King County Assessor's valuation of existing structures: $ HEREBY :CERTIFY. Al l HAVE iEA�1► .1N1$ APP 'II Applicant/Authorize ❑ Apartments ❑ Condominiums ❑ Church ❑ Hospital ❑ Other: Square footage of original building space: Square footage of additional building space: Valuation of work to be done: $ ❑ Other: ❑ School/College /University Contact Person Date Application Accepted: Date Application Expires: 09/18/90 1 SUBMITTAL CH"KLIST All site plans shall be provided in one submittal for review by the Public Works Department. Six (6) sets of plans stamped by a licensed engineer are required along with this application completed and signed by the applicant's representative. The following information is necessary for Public Works Department evaluation and approval of site plans: • All utility construction is to meet the City of Tukwila Standards • Indicate scale of drawing and show north arrow Identify location by address or distance to nearest intersection • CURB CUT /ACCESS /SIDEWALKS/ • HANNELIZATIONISTRIPING/SIGNING O Dimensions O Type of surfacing - asphalt, crushed rock, etc.(and thickness) O Percent of slope or runoff direction O Size of curb cuts/location O Vehicular and pedestrian traffic facilities, including signing and striping, wheel chair ramps, curb cuts FIRE LOOP /HYDRANT O Type of pipe O Size of pipe /location O Location and type of all valves O Type of bedding and backfill materials /percent compaction O Distance from structures, storm and sewer facilities at minimum separation O Location and size of thrust blocking FLOOD ZONE CONTROL (Requirements are under Flood Ord. No. 1482 and can be obtained from the Public Works Dept.) O Lowest finished floor elevation O Contours and elevations per National Geodetic Vertical Datum LAND ALTERING (CLEARING, GRADE AND FILL) O Contour map (2' intervals) showing existing and proposed contours O Esdmate of yardage, both cut and fill O Erosion control plan HAULING O Copy of Certificate of insurance coverage (minimum $1,000,000) O $2,000 bond made out to the City of Tukwila for property damages caused by activities O Route map LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION O Location of DSHS approved double check valve O Type of pipe - copper, high density molecular plastic, ductile O Size and depth of pipe O Size of meter O Location and elevation of meter box (water meter - permanent and exempt). Clearly show whether tap is on main or domestic service O Location and type of tap O Type of bedding and backfill materials/percent compaction MOVING AN OVERSIZED LOAD O Copy of Certificate of insurance coverage (minimum $1,000,000) O $5,000 bond made out to the City of Tukwila for property damages caused by activities O Business License with City of Tukwila O Route map SANITARY SID'S SEWER O Type of pipe - c;, ete, PVC, etc. O Size of pipe/location O Percent of slope on pipe /length of run O Connection point(s) to public O Location of cleanout(s) and test Tec(s) O Type of bedding and backfill material/percent compaction O Invert elevations at structures and Junctions SEWER MAIN EXTENSION O Type of pipe - concrete, PVC, etc. O Size of pipe/location O Percent of slope on pipe/length of run O Connection point(s) to public 0 Location of cleanouts 0 Type of bedding' and backfill material/percent compaction STORM DRAINAGE (Including existing topography and proposed grading and surfacing) O Type of pipe O Size of pipe O Percent of slope/length of run O Location of all structures O Square footage of area to be drained, including roof area O Bedding material for pipe O Invert or flow line elevations STREET USE O Complete description of proposed activity O Map with address and outline of limits of activity relative to public right -of -way and easements O Proposed traffic control/detour (per Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices) O Proposed schedule (times and dates) WATER MAIN EXTENSION O Type of pipe O Size of pipe O Hydrant type and locations O Valve type and locations O Connection point(s) to existing system O Type of connection - live tap, tee, etc. O Location and size of thrust blockkp O Size and location of mains, including elevations (profile) WATER METER • EXEMPT O Diagram of domestic system/tie in of exempt meter O Number /account for existing domestic meter O Size and type of material of meter and service O Site address WATER METER • PERMANENT O Type of pipe - copper, high density molecular plastic, ductile O Size and depth of pipe O Size of meter O Location and elevation of meter box (water meter - permanent and exempt) O Location and type of tap 0 Type of bedding and backfill materials/percent compaction WATER METER - TEMPORARY O Address and hydrant location O Size of meter O Estimate of quantity and schedule er the ' u "o • • : partment as com : t:. t e r rev : an • t e p : s are approv: t e : s . : t w by letter concerning the necessary permits and requirements; an approved set of plans will accompany the letter. If the plans are not approved, the applicant will be notified by letter of necessary resubmlttal requirements. not CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 December 7, 1990 PHONE 11 (206) 4331800 L. VanDusen, Mayor Mr. James M. Mcgregor /Sonya Larsen :21010 9th Ave. So. Seattle, WA 98188 REs. building Permit 4791 Dear Sir: Public Works has reviewed and approves your site plan. If you should have any questions. please ,office at 433 -0179. Sin erel the IdriVewayi revision to do not hesitate to call my Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer Greg. Villanueva Denise Millard, Permit Coordinator'' Development File: McGregor'Single Family Read File PFG /pfsresident CITY OF TUKWILA 40 Ilk Building Division ( t 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1845 BUILDING PERMIT PERMIT # 434 Control 0 86 -155 cork to be done Reroof ;ite Address 18338 Andover Pk W Suite 0 Tenant Fletchers Meat Wilding Use Warehouse /Office Assessors Account # 'roperty Owner M. A. Segale Phone 0 575 -3200 Address P.Q. Box 88050 Tukwila. WA Zip 98188 :ontractor Besco Roofing, Inc. #BESCORI -155M5 Phone 763 -4705 Address 233 South Holden Seattle WA Zip 98108 j Ken Miller 763 -4705) OR BUILDING PERMI ONLY annrnved fnr Sq. Ft. Iii -FT. Office warehouse Retail Other Occ. Load 2nd Fl. 3rd F1. r . _ —�—� Total _ Fire Protection:(] Sprinklers [] Detectors Zoning Type of Construction Special Conditions Fees sq. ft. @ 1st Fri. $ sq. ft. @ 2nd Fl. $ sq. ft. @ other $ sq. ft. @ other $ __ Total Valuation of Construction S 21,000.00 Bldg. Permit Fee Receipt #1394 $ 147.00 Plan Chuck Fee Receipt #1394 $ -WO- Demolition Receipt 0 $ Surcharges Receipt 01394 $ 1.50 Other Receipt 0 S Other Receipt 0 $ TOTAL S 1 UR SIGN PERMIT ONLY ❑ Permanent [] Temporary ❑ Single Face 0 Double Face [] Wall Mounted ❑ Free Standing ❑ Other Building face Setbacks: Front Side Side Rear Square Footage of each sign face Total square footage of sign Special Conditions THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN i8D DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK 15 SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 GAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK 1S COMMENCED. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW 111E SAME 10 BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS Of LAWS AND ORUINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL Bf COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING Or A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY 10 VIOLATE OR CEL THE o NS OF ANY THER STATE. LOCAL LAW ,REGULATING CONST p�CTIO OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. S (fined [1 -�=if . �� � -Q -1 �".`°_"fi J/`- Date / i 4'(/ LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I on licens d under provisi /q' ssil/ t!'.: Buusinessand Prof stons Co. d hand my license is in full force and effect. Contractor (signature) ,�� �7 --`G 'L }Y�ti _'.Y ' 4`ff a /c'*/ OWNER- BUILDER DECLARATION ( ) 1, as owner of the property, or my employees, with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not Intended or offered for sale. 1 ) 1, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractor's to construct the project. Owner (signature)._ Date