Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 4559 - Radovich - Fort Dent Office - Grade / FillCITY OF TUKWILA Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1845 BUILDING PERMIT Work to be done GRADE & FILL Site Address 6720 Southcenter Blvd Building Use Office Property Owner John C. Radovirh Address 2000 124th Avenue NF Contractor ,lnhn C. Radnvirh Address FOR BUILDING PERMIT ONLY PERMIT # 6/537 Control # 85 -367 Suite # Tenant Fort Dent Office Assessors Account # 295490 - 0455 -03 Phone # 454 -6060 Zip gR005 Phone # B -103 roved for Issuance Bellevue Zip S Ft. Sq. Office Storage/ Warehouse Retail Other Occ. Load 1st F1. 2nd Fl. 3rd F1. Total Fire Protection: L( Sprinklers L[ Detectors Zoning Type of Construction Special Conditions Subgrade preparation including drainage, Fees sq. ft. @ sq. ft. @ sq. ft. @ sq. ft. @ 1st F1. $ 2nd F1. $ other $ other $ Total Valuation of Construction $ Bldg. Permit Fee Plan Check Fee Demolition Surcharges Other Other TOTAL Receipt # c!$11 f $ 162 00 Receipt #q tjt $ 30. 0 Receipt # $ Receipt # $ Receipt # $ Receipt # $ $ 192.00 1 1 ' I • II • 1 1 . / 1 $ 11 excavation, compaction. 11111N-l/• /1 1 1 and 1/ and be accomplished under the direct supervision of the soils engineer of record. Copies o FOR SIGN PERMIT ONLY rapnrtc will ha provided to Tukwila RuildinQ rapt_ [� Permanent Temporary [[ Single Face L Double Face E: Wall Mounted ❑ Free Standing Q Other Building face Setbacks: Front Side Side Rear Square Footage of each sign face Special Conditions Total square footage of sign IRIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CA EL THE PROV,ISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. c4,..Signed Date �� _ LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION I hereby affirm that 1 am licensed under provisions of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and effect. Contractor (signature) Date OWNER- BUILDER DECLARATION ( ) 1, as owner of the property, or my employees, with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. ( ) I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractor's to construct the project. Owner (signature) Date CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1845 BUILDING PERMIT -?PERMIT # `/ � 4 Control # R5_ ?c37 Work to be done GRADE & FILL Site Address 116720 Southcenter Blvd Suite # Tenant Fort Dent Office Building Use Office Assessors Account # 295490- 0455 -03 Property Owner John C Rado+,ich Phone # 454 - -6060 Contractor 2000 124th Avenue NF R -103 Rpl1nvne Zip (m005 Address John C. Radnvich 1 Phonies FOR BUILDING PERMIT ONLY ApNroved for Issuance by: /,N��'s0 Sq. S Ft. Office Storage/ Warehouse Retail Other Occ. Load 1st F ;. 2nd F 3rd F1. Total Fire Protection: [[ Sprinklers [[ Detectors Zoning Type of Construction Special Conditions Subgrade preparation including drainage,, , Zip Fees sq. ft. @ 1st F1. $ sq. ft. @ 2nd F1. $ sq. ft. @ other $ sq. ft. @ other $ Total Valuation of Construction $ Bldg. Permit Fee Receipt #4150/ $ 162 00 Plan Check Fee Receipt #(6/46( $ 30,00 Demolition Receipt # $ Surcharges Receipt # $ Other Receipt # $ Other Receipt # $ TOTAL $ 192.00 -s . i excavation, compaction, and - 1 1 -IS. 1/ a- and be accomplished under the direct supervision of the soils engineer of record. Copies o FOR SIGN PERMIT ONLY rnpnri-s will hr, prnv i dprl to Tukwila Rii i 1 di ng flpni' . [] Permanent [l Temporary [[ Single Face [[ Double Face El Wall Mounted [l Free Standing [[ Other Building face Setbacks: Front Side Side Rear Square Footage of each sign face Total square footage of sign Special Conditions THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FUR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK 1S COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DUES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CA CEL THE PROVSIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. (c_Signed <::.: �i- �i.s r Date G,J7 LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am licensed under provisions of the Business and Professions Code, and my license is in full force and effect. Contractor (signature) Date OWNER- BUILDER DECLARATION ( ) 1, as owner of the property, or my employees, with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. ( ) I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractor's to construct the project. Owner (signature) Date CITY OF TUKWILA .Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Type of Inspection R y)C1 Site Address 76o?Rd t 1W141, 4 Requestor Special Instructions INSPEC4,)N RECORD PERMIT # u�9 Date Date Wanted a.m. ^ p.m. Project Cf Phone # Inspection Results /Comments: Inspector l(i'rit-12 Date c% %/%/ c City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433-1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: Duane Griffin, Building Official FROM: Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer j2 DATE: 12/10/86 SUBJECT: Radovich Fill Permit (Phase I) - Plan Sheet 2 of 3 (Job # 4146.31) Dated 12/10/86 Public Works Dept. has reviewed and approved this fill permit limited to the described fill and temporary erosion detail. This fill shall be provided uunder the direction of the soils engineer and with the support of the civil engineer knowledgeable of the permit requirements for DOE and the Dept. of Fisheries. The plans do not state that King County Datum is used; however, it is assumed this to be the case. A Licensed Land Surveyor shall certify that King County. Datum is used in the interpretation and construction of these plans and also that a recognized King County Reference Point has been used as a take . off for the survey of this constructed fill. to SrV( %cif I )c L arl ix'nt cat IYY)k)gy FLOOD CONTROL ZONE PERMIT PERMIT NO. 1- 5929 -2 Permission k granted under provisions of Chapter 86.16 RCW, this 4 day of November granted 86 John C. Radovich (Name of applicant) 2000 124th N.E., B -103, Bellevue, WA 98005 (Address) to construct and maintain a two -story office building (Description of works) for the period 19 to 19 or in perpetuity ink Section 24 Township 23N. N., Range 4E. W.M. and /or in Section , Township N., Range . W.M. on Green River located within the Green River (Name of stream or flood plain affected) (Flood Zone) Flood Control Zone No 2 , Said works, structures, or improvements must be in accordance with the Application No. 1- 5929 -2 and plans attached thereto ..n file with the Department of Ecology, which are incorporated by reference as terms of this permit. The work herein authorized shall commence on or after the 4 day of NOVeltber 19 86 and shall be completed on or before the 4 day of Novenber 19 87 or before such dates as may be specified by. any extensions granted. This permit is subject to the conditions printed on the reverse hereof and the acceptance by the permittee. cc: King County Surface Water Mgmt. City of Tukwila ECY 060.6 Rev. 11/79 RECEIVED (CITY OF TUKW(LA DEC - 8 1986 BUILDING DgPT1, Regional Man ger DEPARTMEN OF ECOLOGY TIIIS PERMIT IS SUBJECT TO T. • FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. This permit is granted under authority of Chapter 159, Session Laws of 1935, (Chapter 86.16 RCW) 2. No property rights are granted herein, nor does this permit absolve permittee from liability for any damage which may be suffered to life or to property, public or private, by reason of works, structures and improvements authorized hereunder. 3. This permit does not obviate the necessity of obtaining other permits required by federal, state, or local law. 4. The permittee shall remove, at his own expense, all falseworks, structures and materials incident to the construction of the work herein authorized. Works and structures erected under permit covering a specific period of time shall be removed by the permittee at his own expense upon the expiration of said period or at the expiration of any ex- tension of time which may be granted. 5. Sliuuld permittee fail to remove, at the proper time, materials, works and structures referred to under paragraph 4, the director reserves the right to have it done at the expense of the permittee. 6. Any alteration of plans for works and structures made subsequent to the filing of an application or the issuance of permit shall be subject to approval by the director. 7. The director shall be notified by the permittee of the completion of works under this permit in order that he may make final inspection and give final approval. 8. RCW 86.16.100 provides that the exercise by the state regulatory powers shall not imply or create any liability for any damages against the state, and the action taken by the department herein shall not imply or create any liability for any damages against the state. 9. When necessary to provide for the proper maintenance or operation of the works, structures, or improvements as authorized herein, the department may issue supplementary orders providing for such. 10. This permit is subject to further special conditions as follows : 11. This permit is accepted subject to provisions of law' and regulations and conditions herein prescribed, November 5, 1986 Moira Carr Bradshaw Planning Department City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 • Subject: Fill and Excavation Detail - Fort Dent Office Building Dear Moira: Section B.1.e of the environmental checklist requests specific information regarding filling and grading. We were unable to answer this question when the application was submitted as part of the Shoreline One Permit and BAR review in May. We now have more detail and offer the following information. B. Environmental Elements: 1. Earth e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. As per King County Flood Zone Control Permit lo. 2 -1622, we will be excavating approximately 800 cubic yards of material from the bank of the Green River. This material will be disposed of off - site. Other excavation includes approximately 5500 cubic yards of material. A four -foot cut on the soathern half of the building area is required to attain a suitable building site. The remain- der is general on -site grading. Filling of the site includes 1600 cubic yards of structural fill below the footings and slab and 300 cubic yards of fill material throughout the paved areas. The fill for the paved areas will only be used if during site grading, adequate compaction of existing soils cannot be achieved and removal of these unsuit- able soils becomes necessary. Any new fills will be taken from on -site excavation materials. 20011n�,.R Development Corp. 0 -124th Ave. N.E. B -103 Bellevue, WA 99005 (206) 454 -6060 1986 PLANNING DEP1 �- Lastly, Earth Consultants has recommended the placement of approximately 2200 cubic yards of surcharge fill in the build - ing.area. This fill is required to induce settlement and will remain in place for approximately four weeks, then.vill be removed off -site. I. trust I have answered the above question in enough detail. If you have any questions, please call. Cordially, • Katie Greif: Development Manager CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - Utility Plan Review Routing Form CONTROL NUMBER O S ;,,3& 7 TO: ❑ PWD Admin. ❑Sewer Dept. ['water Dept. ❑Street Dept. ❑Other n D❑ Fire Dept. ,P1g Dept. ❑ Rec. Dept. ❑Police Dept. ❑Other PROJECT Fr)/ /3,?_41l 0!---(-7(6 A ADDRESS '' &KAI 1 UOt DATE TRANSMITTED C.P.S. STAFF COORDINATOR - -xv i REQUESTED BY /> •, 3f -8(,0 /. ,i/ _ VIA CPS TECH PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND- WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW. INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: ❑ ❑ s 0 PLAN REVIEWER DATE (PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM WITH PLANS TO THE CPS TECH) EXG6 -VA—T nN nTr a.u4Ni/7--/r 5-„S-DC) Gu y.o op Goa V.t) GM L/ A 'l oti 6=a h F /: L L, ---4- ; T' P C T f.J 1619 C... I L L RECEIVED. CITY OF TUKWILA U' OV 04 1986 aUILDJNG Dart STEPAN & ASSOCIATES, Inc. 33505 13th Place South Federal Way, WA 98003 927.7850 / 88.2.4771 Project Job No Subject • Comp. Dote Sheet. _of Chkd Ooh Earth Consultants Inc. Geotechnical Engineering and Geology John C. Radovich 2000 -124th NE, #B -103 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Attention: Ms. Katie Greif Gentlemen: June 13, 1986 E -3007 111 eaC0Jf,D TTT; 1985 ciTy OF TiJ,wviLA, PLANNING DEPT. We are pleased to submit herewith our report entitled "Geotech- nical Engineering Study, Fort Dent Office Building, Tukwila, Washington." This report presents the results of our field exploration, laboratory tests, and engineering analysis. The purpose and scope of our study was outlined in our proposal dated May 13, 1986. ECI is currently preparing recommendations for erosion protection along the Green River. Recommendations regarding the Green River erosion protection will be submitted to you under separate cover. In preparing this report, we have reviewed boring logs and test pits drilled on this site, and a report prepared for an adjacent site. The results of our study indicate that the site is underlain by loose fine- grained fills overlying loose alluvial soils. These soils are moderately compressible. It is recommended that the building fills be placed and allowed to remain until settlements have stabilized. This should take about three weeks to stabilize. Post - construction total settlements should be on the order of one to two inches, with differential settlements of about one inch. If this magnitude of settlement cannot be tolerated, then the northern portion of the building receiving fills should be surcharged with a two foot thick surcharge. The proposed structure may be supported on conventional shallow spread and /or continuous footings bearing on structural fill. The existing site soils are fine - grained and moisture sensitive. If grading activities are conducted during wet weather, site developments costs will be higher due to delays during heavy rains, the need to import clean pit -run for structural fills, and difficulty in access for equipment. 1805 136th Place N.E., Suite 101, Bellevue, Washington 98005 / Bellevue (206) 643 - 3780 /Seattle (206) 464 -1584 John C. Radovich June 13, 1986 E -3007 Page 2 This report has been prepared for specific application to this project in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices for the exclusive use of JC Radovich Development Corporation and their representatives. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. We recommend that this report, in its entirety, be included in the project contract documents for the information of the contractor. The following sections of this report describe our study and contain recommendations regarding foundation design criteria, earthwork considerations, and site drainage. PROJECT DESCRIPTION At the time our study was performed, the site and proposed building locations were as shown schematically on the Exploration Location Plan, Plate 2. Based on our discussions with you, your architect and structural engineer, we understand that the project involves the construction of a two -story office building with slabs -on- grade. We anticipate maximum interior column loads will be on the order of 125 kips, dead plus live, with perimeter column loads of 70 kips. Cuts and fills on the order of five feet will be required to prepare the site for construction. Provisions for storing stormwater beneath the structure in vaults may also be included in the final building layout. At this time the final building configuration and details have not been determined. We should be consulted to review the recommendations contained in this report once final plans have been developed. In any case, it is recommended that Earth Consultants, Inc. provide a general review of the final design prior to the start of of construction. SITE CONDITIONS Surface As shown on the attached vicinity map, the site is located at the eastern end of Southcenter Boulevard in Tukwila, Washington. Existing site conditions are presented on Plate 2, Exploration Location Plan. Generally the site is bordered on the east by the Fort Dent Access Road, on the north by the Green River, on the west by undeveloped land and on the south by Southcenter Boulevard. The site slopes from the southwest to the northeast with overall relief on the order of ten feet. The site is covered by grasses and native brush. Earth Consultants, Inc. John C. Radovich June 13, 1986 E -3007 Page 3 The Green River channel is immediately north of the northern property line. The river banks have inclinations on the order of a 2:1 (Horizontal:Vertical) to 1:1 (H:V) with local areas steeper than a 1:1 (H:V). The river "bed" beneath the water surface appears to be lined with quarry rock varying in size from fifty (50) to four hundred (400) pounds. The river banks are covered by a non - continuous cover of six (6) to twelve (12) inch quarry spalls that have been overgrown with grasses and berry vines. A local area of erosion is occurring beneath the discharge of a storm drain adjacent to the northeast corner of the site. A portion of the bank along the north center of the site appears to have slumped due to local undercutting of the river bank. Subsurface The site was explored by excavating ten test pits and hand excavating a series of hand auger holes at the locations shown on Plate 2. Please refer to the test pit logs, Plates 4 through 10, for a detailed description of the conditions encountered at each location explored. A description of the field exploration methods and laboratory testing program is included in this report following the Discussion and Recommendations section. The follow- ing is a generalized description of the subsurface conditions encountered. Our test pits encountered relatively uniform subsurface conditions beneath the site. Generally, the site is underlain by loose silts to the full depth explored by our test pits. The upper six to ten feet of these soils may be fills that were placed in an uncontrolled manner. Borings done in this site by others extended to thirty four (34) feet below grade. These borings encountered loose to medium dense alluvial soils to the depths explored. No highly organic or other highly compressible soils were encountered or noted in the previous explorations or our subsurface explorations on the site. A previous report for this site by Dames and Moore indicated that the fills were placed in the early 1970's. Groundwater The groundwater seepage levels observed while excavating are shown on the test pit logs. The seepage encountered in our test pits reflects local perched water tables. Previous borings by Mr. James Eaton notes groundwater was encountered from eighteen (18) to twenty four (24) feet below existing grade. The groundwater seepage level is not static, thus one may expect fluctuations in the level depending on the amount of rainfall, the level of the Earth Consultants, Inc. John C. Radovich June 13, 1986 E -3007 Page 4 Green River, surface water runoff, and other factors. Generally the water level is higher in the wetter winter months. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS General The primary geotechnical aspect of this project are the loose fills and allvuial soils that underlie the site. These soils have low to moderate compressibility characteristics and cannot support the structure in their present state without undergoing excessive differential settlements. Current plans call for the southern portion of the building to be on a four foot cut and the northern half of the building to be on four feet of new fills. The new fills will cause settlements within the underlying alluvial soils. In addition, the cut portion of the building has effectively been surcharged through the weight of the fills that will be removed. Thus there exists a potential for excessive differential settlements between the north and south half of the site. We estimate this differential settlement could be on the order of two inches or more and occur over a relatively short distance, possibly between two column footings that span the cut -fill line. To reduce this potential for excessive differential settlements, ECI recommends that you surcharge the northern half of the building. To improve the bearing characteristics, we recommend that all footings be placed on at least two feet of structural fill. The following sections present our recommendations in more detail. Foundations The proposed structure may be supported on conventional conti- nuous and spread footings bearing on at least two feet of structural fill. Overexcavation of soil below the footing may be required depending on final site grades, this will be required in cut areas an din shallow fills. Fill placed under footings should extend outwards from the edge of the footings at least a distance equal to the depth of the fill beneath the footings. Exterior footings should be bottomed at a minimum depth of twelve (12) inches below the lowest adjacent outside finish grade. Interior footings may be at a depth of twelve (12) inches below the top of the slab. Footings bearing on structural fill may be designed for a bearing pressure of twenty five hundred (2500) psf. Continuous and individual spread footings should have minimum widths of Earth Consultants, Inc. John C. Radovich June 13, 1986 E -3007 Page 5 twelve (12) and eighteen (18) inches, respectively. A one -third increase in the above bearing pressures may be used when consider- ing short term wind or seismic loads. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic forces may be resisted by friction between the foundations and the supporting compacted fill subgrade or by passive earth pressure on the foundations. For the latter, the foundations must be poured "neat" against the existing soil or backfilled with a compacted fill meeting the requirements of structural fill. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used between the structural foundation concrete and the supporting subgrade. The passive resistance of undisturbed natural soils or structural fill may be taken as equal to the pressure of a fluid having a density of two hundred fifty (250) pounds per cubic foot (pcf). We recommend that drains be placed around all perimeter foot- ings. The drains should be constructed with a four inch diameter perforated pipe bedded and covered with free draining gravel. The drains should have a positive gradient towards suitable discharge facilities. The footing drainage system should not be tied into the roof drainage system until the drains are tightlined well away from the building. The footing excavation should be backfilled with granular soil except for the top foot which should be backfilled with a relatively impermeable soil such as silt, clay or topsoil. Alternatively, the surface can be sealed with asphalt or concrete pavements. Surcharge Program As indicated earlier in this report, if the anticipated settlements cannot be tolerated, we recommend that the building area be pre - loaded with a minimum of three feet of surcharge fill. The purpose of the surcharge fill is to induce as much settlement in the fill portion of the building area as possible prior to construction. This fill is in addition to any structural fill materials required to achieve design finish grades; thus, the top of the surcharge should be three feet above finish grade and should extend a minimum of five feet beyond the building perimeter or exterior footing line. If future expansion is anticipated, the surcharge should extend at least fifteen (15) feet in the direction of the future addition. The extra surcharge area is to reduce the possibility of differential settlement from future building or surcharge loads. Also, no fill for landscaping purposes should be placed near the building since any additional fill could induce further settlement. The side slopes of the surcharge fill should be inclined no steeper than 1:1 (H:V). The surcharge slope at the cut /fill line should be sloped at a 3:1 (H:V) into the cut portion of the building. We estimate that the surcharge fill will need to remain in place approximately three to Earth Consultants, Inc, John C. Radovich June 13, 1986 E -3007 Page 6 four weeks to permit primary settlements to be completed, after which, building construction may be started. Before placing the surcharge fill, structural fill should be placed six inches above finish grade to allow for anticipated settlement. Depending on site grades, it may be necessary to overexcavate soil to provide the required thickness of structural fill below footings and slabs. Alternatively, footing excavations can be done after removal of the surcharge fill. The surcharge fill does not have to meet any specific requirements except that it should have a minimum in -place total density of one hundred twenty (120) pcf. However, if the surcharge fill is to be used later as fill on another part of the site, we recommend it meet the requirements for structural fill, i.e., contain no organics and be compactible. Structural fill to be placed in wet weather should contain no more than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve. Prior to placement of the surcharge fill, we recommend installation of at least four settlement markers within the surcharge area. These markers should be protected from disturbance by construction equipment. In addition, these markers should be surveyed by ECI personnel or a licensed surveyor daily during fill and surcharge placement and at intervals of 2, 4, 8, 16 (so forth) days after completion of the surcharge fill placement. The initial reading should show the natural ground elevation, and readings taken during surcharge placement should show the surcharge fill thickness. The settlement readings should be evaluated by ECI. The surcharge may be removed when the required settlement has been reached. The exposed subgrade should be proofrolled and any unstable pockets should be overexcavated and replaced by structural fill. Slab -on -Grade Floors Slab -on -grade floors may be supported on existing recompacted fill soils or on at least one foot of structural fill. Greater thickness may be required to stabilize soft or pumping areas. The slab should be provided with a minimum of four inches of free draining sand or gravel. We also recommend that a vapor barrier such as a 6 mil plastic membrane be placed beneath the slab to reduce water vapor transmission through the slab and the resultant moisture accumulation. Two inches of sand may be placed over the membrane for protection during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. Retaining and Foundation Walls Retaining and foundation walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures imposed by the soils retained by these Earth Consultants, Inc, John C. Radovich June 13, 1986 E -3007 Page 7 structures. Walls that are designed to yield an amount equal to at least 0.002 times the wall height can be designed to resist the lateral earth pressure imposed by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of thirty five (35) pcf. If walls are to be restrained at the top from free movement, a uniform force of fifty (50) psf should be added to the equivalent fluid pressure force. For calculating the base resistance to sliding, we recommend using a passive pressure equivalent to that exerted by a fluid having a density of two hundred fifty (250) pcf and a coefficient of friction of 0.35. It is assumed that hydrostatic pressures do not act behind the walls nor that either surcharge slopes or loads will be placed above the walls. If surcharges are to be applied they should be added to the above lateral pressures. Retaining and foundation walls should be backfilled with compacted free- draining soils with no organics. The soil should contain no more than 5 percent silt or clay and no particles greater than four inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing the No. 4 sieve should be between 25 and 70 percent. Alternatively, a geotextile product such as Miradrain may be used. We recommend the use of footing drains at the base of all perimeter footings. The footing drains should be surrounded by at least six inches of one inch minus washed rock, and provided with a positive gradient towards suitable discharge facilities. The pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing. For retaining walls, other than basement walls, weep- holes can be used. The weepholes should be as low as possible to maintain drainage behind the walls. When weepholes are provided, all backfill within eighteen (18) inches of the weephole should consist of one inch minus washed rock. Site Drainage Groundwater was encountered in our test pits at depths ranging from two to five feet. However, it has been our experience that groundwater levels change significantly due to changes in rainfall amounts, surface drainage or other factors. If seepage is encountered in the excavation, the water should be drained away from the site by use of drainage ditches, perforated pipe or French drains, or by pumping from sumps interconnected by shallow connector trenches at the bottom of the excavation. We suggest that appropriate locations of subsurface drains, if needed, be established during grading operations by a represen- tative of Earth Consultants, Inc., at which time the seepage areas, if present, may be more clearly defined. The excavation and site should be graded so that surface water is directed off the site and away from the tops of slopes. Water Earth Consultants, Inc, John C. Radovich June 13, 1986 E -3007 Page 8 should not be allowed to stand in any area where buildings, slabs, or pavements are to be constructed. During construction, loose surfaces should be sealed at night by compacting the surface soils to reduce the infiltration of rain into the soils. Final site grades should allow for drainage away from the building founda- tions. We suggest that the ground be sloped 3 percent for a distance of at least ten feet away from the buildings except in areas that are to be paved. Pavement Areas All parking and roadway areas may be supported on existing site soils provided these soils can be compacted to 95 percent density and are stable at the time of construction. Structural fill and /or fabric may be needed to stabilize soft, wet or unstable areas. In most instances twelve (12) inches of granular fill will stabilize the subgrade except for very soft areas where additional fill may be required. The upper twelve (12) inches of pavement subgrade should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum density. Below this level a compactive effort of 90 percent would be adequate. The pavement section for lightly loaded traffic and parking areas should consist of two inches of asphalt' concrete (AC) over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB) or three inches of asphalt treated base (ATB). Heavier loaded areas would require thicker sections. We will be pleased to assist you in developing appropriate pavement sections or specifications for heavy traffic zones, if needed. Site Preparation and General Earthwork The building and pavement areas should be stripped and cleared of all existing utilities, surface vegetation, all organic matter and any other deleterious material. It is anticipated that a stripping depth of six (6) to eighteen (18) inches will be required. In parking areas where more than two feet of fill are to be placed, the existing vegetation may be trimmed down to grade and the root mats and sod may be left in place. Stripped and mowed materials should be removed from the site or stockpiled for later use in landscaping, if desired. The stripped materials should not be mixed with any materials to be used as structural fill. Structural fill is defined as any fill placed under build- ings, roadways, slabs, pavements, or any other load bearing areas. Following the stripping and /or mowing operation, the ground surface where structural fill, foundations, or slabs are to be placed should be proofrolled. All proofrolling should be performed under the observation of a representative of Earth Consultants, Inc. Soil in any loose or soft areas should be removed and replaced with structural fill to a depth that will provide a stable base beneath the general structural fill. Earth Consultants, inc. John C. Radovich June 13, 1986 E -3007 Page 9 Structural fill under floor slabs and footings should be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to a minimum 95 percent of the maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM Test Designa- tion D- 1557 -78 (Modified Proctor). The fill materials should be placed at or near the optimum moisture content. Fill under pavements and walks should also be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to 90 percent of maximum density except for the top twelve (12) inches which should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density. On -site fine-grained soils at the time of our exploration were over the optimum moisture content and may not be used as structural fill in its present condition. Obtaining adequate compaction and grading will be difficult if the soil moisture is above the optimum moisture content. Ideally, structural fill which is to be placed in wet weather should consist of a granular material with a maximum size of three inches and no more than 5 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve. During dry weather, any compactible granular non - organic soil can be used as structural fill. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Our field exploration was performed on May 13, 1986. The subsurface conditions were explored by excavating ten test pits to a maximum depth of sixteen and one -half (16.5) feet below the existing surface at the approximate locations shown on Plate 2. The locations of the test pits were approximately determined by taping from assumed property corners. Elevations of test pits were approximately determined by interpolation between plan contours. The locations and elevations of the test pits should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. The field exploration was continuously monitored by a senior soils technician from our firm who classified the soils encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative bulk soil samples and observed pertinent site features. Soils were classified visually in the field according to the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented on Plate 3, Legend. The consistency of the so :.1 was estimated based on the effort required to excavate the soil, the stability of the trench walls and other factors. Logs of the individual test pits are presented on Plates 4 through 10, Test Pit Logs. The final logs represent our interpretations of the field logs and the results of the laboratory examination and test of field samples. The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundary between soil types. In actuality, the transition may be gradual. Earth Consultants, Inc, John C. Radovich June 13, 1986 E -3007 Page 10 Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers and returned to our laboratory for further examination and test- ing. Moisture determinations were performed on all samples. Results of moisture determinations, together with classifications, are shown on the test pit logs included in this report. The results of six sieve and hydrometer analyses are illustrated on Plates 11 and 12, Grain Size Analyses. LIMITATIONS Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site materials observed, selective laboratory testing and engineering analyses. The conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of practice. No warranty is expressed or implied. The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the previous borings and ECI's test pits. Soil and groundwater conditions between borings and test pits may vary from those encountered by the borings and test pits. The nature and extent of variations between borings and test pits may not become evident until construction. If variations then appear, Earth Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to reevaluate the recom- mendations of this report prior to proceeding with the construction. Additional Services It is recommended that Earth Consultants, Inc. provide a general review of the final design and specifications to verify that the earthwork and foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in the design and in the con- struction specifications. It is also recommended that Earth Consultants, Inc. be retained to provide geotechnical services during construction. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifica- tions or recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to the start of construction. Earth Consultants, Inc. John C. Radovich June 13, 1986 E -300.7 Page 11 following table and plates are attached and complete this CRL /RSL /tm Table A Plate 1 Plate 2 Plate 3 Plates 4 through 10 Plate 11 and 12 of Q, S. LEA i EART Q2 44. IIs k, 00 A S N. //ii �0 k k, ...r obert S. Levinson, P. E. iv 0 9 14691 Pres ident F 'ONAL• Hand Auger Lots Vicinity Map `Exploration Location Plan Legend Test'Pit Logs, Grain Size Analysis _:1=tr_._77._ SULTANTS, INC. ( :) John C. Radovich E -3007 June 13, 1986 TABLE A HAND AUGER HOLES HA -1 HA- 2 HA -3 HA -4 HA -5 HA -6 HA -7 Descri�t.ion spalls at one foot spalls at one foot spalls at one foot sand at zero to two feet sand at zero to two feet sand at zero to two feet sand at zero to two feet Note: All hand auger holes were .limited to a total of two feet in depth during preliminary field work. Additional hand auger holes are being excavated along the river bank. Earth Consultants, Inc. to R; A • `11 f � SIT_F_ oso 5 IrEn10n vILL.GE LL r}h II1H . n S 1 1140 dO. .1NSlN y1 T 221 Reference : King County / Mop 41 By Thomas Brothers Maps Dated 1986 Earth Consultants Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Vicinity Map R. Dent Office Building Tukwila, Washington ProJ. No. 3007 Date June '86 Plate 1 10 _ -A-HA-4 ��— HA_5___« 20 2s =MO WO GREEN -- i R /iV - R Apperent lump in River Bank HA-T - - -gir HA- 6 - - -- 1 -- • Ei _—__ -4- -1 Existing Storm Drain '• j / • GREEN • e..6. -- i R /'V"R Appoenti — —ittk HA-6 urnp in River Sank Erosion from Storm • �— Discharge_ HA-2 Existing Storm Drain TP-4 + A. NA_3._.� 30 e Approximate Scale 0 20 40 80ft, 0 ®TP-3 z w 0 • HA-1 SOUTHCENTER .1 LEGEND Approximate Test Pit Location Approximate Hand Auger Location Approximate Location of Boring by Others Approximate Location of Test Pit by Others Proposed Building References : Sheet 1 of 2 Topographic Survey By PAC- TECH Engineering, Inc. Dated 1/29/86 Site Plan By Mithun Bowman Emrich Group P.S. Dated 5/21/86 Earth Consultants Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY Exploration Location Plan Ft. Dent Office Building Tukwila, Washington Proj. No. 3007 : Date June '86 Plate MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAPH SYMBOL o 0•.. • ••..:SGW ' '•'•' °•.....•'• • I LETTER SYMBOL gw TYPICAL DESCRIPTION Coarse Grained Sods More Than 50 %. Material Larger Than No. 200 Sieve Size Gravel And Gravelly Soils More 50% Coarse Fraction Retained On No 4 Sieve Clean Gravels (little or no fines) WeII- Graded Gravels, Gravel Sand Mixtures, Little Or No Fines :• ::e::6: . 0 • • r • .. • • GP % gp Poorly • Graded Gravels, Gravel- Sand Mixtures, Little Or No Frnes Gravels With Fines( appreciable amount of lines) . 0 M GMT/ gm Silty Gravels, Gravel- Sand - Silt Mixtures Ysjl j / 'w�' . GC gc Clayey Gravels, Gravel • Sand - Clay Mixtures Sand And Sandy Soils More Than 50% Coarse Fraction Passing No 4 Sieve�'' Clean Sand 1little or no fines) e e 00O° °o• . • • °o• a °•o °O SW�/ SW Well- Graded Sands. Gravelly Sands, Little Or No Fines e-1"`;• • • .,:; ,.!.'•II•.r..' 1;1, ^. I; i :�;{ ' ; , .I,," • • 1' •' SP Sp Poorly•Graded Sands, Gravelly Sands, Little Or No Fines Sands With Fines (appreciable amount of Imes) SM Sm Silty Sands, Sand - Silt Mixtures ��,/� SC ��� SC �. Clayey Sands, Sand • Clay Mixtures Fine Grained Soils More Than 50 %< Material No. 200 Than No. 200 Sieve Size Silts Liquid Limit And Less Than 50 Clays 111111111MM �A ill l III l I ML ry .' Roc, lihk .S Clnyey Inorganic Fine Sills Sands; 8 Ve Clayey Fine Sts Sandsi w Sgt Plasticity Flourilty- CL • CI Inorganic Clays O) Low To Medium Plasticity -~ Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays. Lean OL = '�oI Organic Silts And Organic Silty Clays 01 Low Plasticity Sills And Great Limit (;lays Greater Than 50 t1 11 ZZeo I.rir �.��rIrrr •,' / ,'OH MH - � mh Inorganic Sills, Micaceous Or Diatomaceous Fine Sand Or Silly Sods CH -- /� ch Inorganic Clays O1 High Plasticity, Fat Clays Oh Organic Clays Of Medium To High Plasticity, Organic Sills Highly Organic Sods '=% ^'. — ,• PT / pt Peat. Humus, Swamp Sods With High Organic Contents Topsoil ,,, Humus And Duff Layer Fill •••••• •• • • • Highly Variable Constituents The Discussion In The Text 01 This Report Is Necessary For A Proper Understanding 01 The Nature 01 The Material Presented In The Attached Logs Notes : Dual symbols are used to indicate borderline soil classification. Upper case letter symbols designate sample classifications based upon lab- oratory testing; lower case letter symbols designate classifications not verified by laboratory testing. 1 31 P $Z WATER LEVEL (DATE) WATER OBSERVATION WELL 2'0.D. SPLIT SPOON SAMPLER 2.4" I.D. RING SAMPLER OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER SAMPLER PUSHED SAMPLE NOT RECOVERED C TORVANE READING, tsf qu PENETROMETER READING, tsf W MOISTURE, percent of dry weight pcf DRY DENSITY. pounds per cubic ft. LL LIQUID LIMIT, percent PI PLASTIC INDEX Earth Consultants Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY LEGEND Proj. No. 3007 1 Date June' 86 °late 3 Depth (ft.) 0 10 15 Loyd By SIB Date 5/13/86 USCS TEST P1T Soil Description EIev. ----__ W (96) ml Gray SILT with roots, moist, loose ml Gray SILT with trace of gravel, dry, dense ml Gray SILT, moist to wet, loose to medium dense Brown SILT, moist, loose to medium dense, non — plastic 17 11 26 37 Test pit terminated at 16.5 feet below existing grade. Slight groundwater seepage encountered at 2 to 3 feet during excavation. 1 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING A GEOLOGY TEST PIT LOGS FT. DENT OFFICE BUILDING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj. No. 3007 !Date ,Tune' 86 [i.t. 4 Depth (ft) 0- Loyd ay RWB Date 5`1'VR6 USCS TEST PIT NO. .2.. Soil Description 10 -- 15 ml Brownish SILT, moist to wet, loose (caving of test pit walls) Gray SILT with occasional gravel, dry to moist, l.7 medium dense ml Brown SILT, moist, loose to medium dense, non- elastic 34 Test pit terminated at 13.5 feet below existing grade. Slight groundwater seepage encountered from upper 5 feet during excavation. OVA GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY TEST PIT LOGS FT. DENT. OFFICE BUILDING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj. No. 3007 : Date June' 86 Piste 5 Depth (ft,) 0 10 15 Low By RWB Date 5/13/86 USCS ml ml TEST PIT NO...... _ Soil Description Gray SILT, moist, loose sm ml Brownish SILT with oxidation stains, moist, loose Brownish silty fine SAND to sandy SILT, moist, loose to medium dense 21 16 14 Test pit terminated at 14 feet below existing grade. No ground- water seepage encountered during excavation. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 6 GEOLOGY TEST PIT LOGS FT. DENT OFFICE BUILDING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj. No. 3007 Date June' 86 Platy 6 Logged By RWB Date 5/13/86 TEST PIT NO.... Depth (ft.) USCS Soil Description 0 (8" topsoil) ml Gray SILT with roots, moist, loose, non - plastic 10 16 ml Becomes brownish SILT, moist to wet, loose sin Brownish silty fine SAND, moist, loose to medium dense Becoming more sandy 25 45 17 Test pit terminated at 14 feet below existing grade. No ground- water seepage encountered during excavation. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 4 GEOLOGY TEST PIT LOGS FT. DENT OFFICE BUILDING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj. No. 3007 I Date June' 86 I Plata 7 1 E a� Logged By RWB Date Depth (ft.) 0 ,I) 5 10 15 5 10 5/11/A6 USCS PIT NO._.5_ Soil Description Elev. W (%) ml Gray SILT, moist, loose Gray - brownish, sandy SILT, moist, medium dense 20 15 Test pit terminated at 13 feet below existing grade. No ground- water seepage encountered during excavation. Logged By RWB s_ Data, 5/13/86 TEST PIT NO. E Iev. ..�. 15 1 * 1.1 I,i ml Brownish SILT, moist, loose ml Brownish sandy SILT, dry to moist, dense Gray clayey SILT, moist, stiff, medium plasticity 16 13 24 Test pit terminated at 13 feet below existing grade. Slight groundwater seepage encountered at 3 to 4 feet during excavation. Earth Ct►sl�u t>ls Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY TEST PIT LOGS FT. DENT OFFICE BUILDING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj. No. 3007 Date June' 86 Plate 8 Lowed By RWB Date 5/13/86 Depth (ft.) USCS 0 TEST PIT Soil Description ml Brownish SILT, moist, loose 10 -- 15 m]. Gray SILT with trace of sand and gravel, moist to wet, medium dense (test pit walls caved) sm Brown -tan gravelly SAND with some silt, mixed with gray SILT; moist, medium dense 18 8 Test pit terminated at 13 feet below existing grade. No ground- water seepage encountered during excavation. Logged By RWB Data 5/13/86 TEST PIT E lev. ml Brownish SILT, moist, loose Gray SILT, slightly clayey, dry, stiff to very stiff, low to medium plasticity 10 -- 15 ml Gray SILT with fine sand, trace of gravel and some organics, wet, medium dense 18 17 Test pit terminated at 11.5 feet below existing grade. Moderate groundwater seepage encountered at 2 feet during excavation. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY TEST PIT LOGS FT. DENT OFFICE BUILDING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj. No. 3007 I Date June' 86 Plate 9 1 1 Depth (ft.) 0 10 15 Lo By RWB Ogee 5/11/86 USCS ml TEST PIT Soil Description Brownish SILT, wet, loose EIev. — W (96) Gray SILT, slightly clayey, soft to medium stiff, low plasticity 20 19 m1 Gray SILT, moist, loose to medium dense, non - plastic 22 Test pit terminated at 13 feet below existing grade. No ground- water seepage encountered during excavation. Logged By RWB Date ___5/ 13/86 0 .� ml 5— 10 15 m1 TEST PIT NiO. la. Brownish tan sandy SILT, moist, loose MOO IMO INIM MIN• =NO Grayish with lighter spots SILT with trace of sand, wet, loose, non - plastic EIev. 20 24 Test pit terminated at 12 feet below existing grade. No ground- water seepage encountered during excavation. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY TEST PIT LOGS FT. DENT OFFICE BUILDING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj. No. 3007 ; Date June' 86 ' Plate 10 Zoo' 0 CJ PERCENT COARSER BY WEIGHT 0 0 0 0 0 0 + ' n 1111 nl II III 111111111111111 n nl 111111111111 HIu1111mnn11 1 n111n11111 111u111111n111 :Lvov, nn��n lluInlllll/hlll zi900 n � nau.iinnii�� ■ EZEMI■■n■■■■IVIII 800' rrsri// rmuno/ sair i// mnosimw//// /in//w/omruomr■■ l0' iiIflhIIIIIIIIIIIIhllhIIIIIIIIIIOIhllIllllNIN w °w w�w° w/w� �rwwr�wwawwwwwwwww�w 1111P1M1111=111111111N111111111111M1111111111111 Illimmid111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Iu ssuhnuffin uInhnnsmnIu ssusiIIufl eo' II1IIIIHnIllUhIU III /nnhIIIIIIIII$UuII!!!g:1IIlIUI! O OOZ MEM rifwrwrw wwwwwrn- �uwwin.�awwirllw= Uu� iiUiiuUiii 11111 lia.maram °A illillllllill ,;�; 09 ■��nn��� ,. n� �r�nn� P!!!:.° :ir11n11111111nliil illi1111111111I a �111111111111111r 11111111111 111111111111111110 11Iilln 1 1111 1 ni1N1111111111111,1 : oumi ■■ uI•u■■■■u■■■; 2z b iiiii1611n11nn1111111111111151nn11n1111111111u1u: W ungiumummuumisamminummumb- ci) 11111�111I11111111111111 !II11111111111111111111 _ z'I �t lnnlllll uIIIlm lll/nllllllUllllllIIuI /I a,5 mrnnni>w�hI r.:bUhUUIUIlI000■UuUUUIIluuIAU■ 4ic i�111 umninun iii1111�111111111111111111t1mui IIIIlI ! flIUIIlIII� UIlIIIIIIIIIIIuI 1111111 ell ��1a�r. sii... a.. uun.uuuu..aa.in.u..u.aua.inuu■■ lltilllllllfllllllllIIIU lliln11111111n1illio 111111I11I111111111I1I1111I 11111111111n111MIN 11 m1mn1111 1R1u1111111n111n111111111111: iniiii11111mim11n11n11111111n11n111111111 NIIIIIIllIIIIIIlIINIllONlNhlIIIIlIlIIOhIIIIi A ZO' £O' 170' } 2 z 0 w 0 U. 0 w N L00 Z00• E00' v00' 900' 800' LO' ZO' CO' 00' 90' w z 90' L' y Q: w Z F- LL W . Ez 9' Z$Q 8' w to L N Q N w w c.7 r 4 0 w 0L J tJJ OZ �0 0 OE ov 0 L.) 09 08 �-- ool J on co OOZ 00 b Zl 0 0 ww uu a 1' 0 0 PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT 8 00c 0 0 .0 '-4 ilty SAND wit or:anic- ilt SAND wit :rave mammurszci. ire • oao Earth Consultants Yilc. GEOTECHNICAL. ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY GRAIN SIZE ANALYSES FT. DENT OFFICE BUILDING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj, No. 3007 ( Date June' 86 Plate 1 1 L00 cn zoo' c6 r, E00 tr00' 900' 800• LO' t/) J z LUJ H PER INCH. U.S. STANDARD w u. 0 w z w x 0 z z z a 0 u. 0 w N z0 CO 40 90 00 00 0 0' 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 V V, 0 0 PERCENT COARSER BY WEIGHT 0 0 • 0 0 N 0 40f 0 0 1 ,e G i 1111 ' n/71/rn181 nrrin11l1mITiOnlrIUM 'z uiiu inniiiiiiuiliiiu ii r��r r nrinnnnnimi 10 � in i nm....sn. mrmm a 1 r 0 a 1 0 m 0 N 0 0 m 0 0 PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT 0 0 1- L00' Z00' C00' as N N ■00' 900' 800' L0' z0' CO' 90' 90' 80• L' c cc z' Lu E 9' Z 8' w L N Z E 9 9 8 01 OZ OE 09 09 08 00L 0 00Z ooE W z D x O. s UJ silty SAND 0 N s NV) 0 oao Earth Consultants Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY GRAIN SIZE ANALYSES FT. DENT OFFICE BUILDING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj, No. 3007 Date June' 86 i Plate 12 . *w///.ww —w ■• • - wr.n.+s 41,141.110 • 71,1•110 SMINIOND111.... ,1' i it _ _ • • 1 ,OM, 1 UMMUMU M 1 1 1 1 11111 ! ! 1 1 1 i i j j M 0 ; M MUM I jnifi�r III 11111111110MIMMENIMMI 1 r■■rnr■ 1 1=1: ■ r r ■■ n n■r i illie■ j rwrrr�Ir r rrr r rw� r �rsrrr�rrr�rs s rrrrorr� r llnlln 0 NUM1 ! srr�rrrrrrrrrrrrr�rr�rrr 1 rurrwrrwrrii e 0 ' !/R"I/UnUn_ ' , , i iiriian wn ' i iiiI!Iiirniiiniiiiiiiii.aii U r i1111111111111n11111i111n111III1! UE d dIHIHInlllltrn/rnII 1 1; ��o' i .'` E r rlllnn i ii11 1 1 1 1 ,7aruria u NM 1 uaiiuivaaim I 11 , IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUIII 0 a 1 0 m 0 N 0 0 m 0 0 PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT 0 0 1- L00' Z00' C00' as N N ■00' 900' 800' L0' z0' CO' 90' 90' 80• L' c cc z' Lu E 9' Z 8' w L N Z E 9 9 8 01 OZ OE 09 09 08 00L 0 00Z ooE W z D x O. s UJ silty SAND 0 N s NV) 0 oao Earth Consultants Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING & GEOLOGY GRAIN SIZE ANALYSES FT. DENT OFFICE BUILDING TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj, No. 3007 Date June' 86 i Plate 12 . *w///.ww —w ■• • - wr.n.+s 41,141.110 • 71,1•110 SMINIOND111.... ,,''�� Site Project Valuation Property Applicant Architect Contractdr Hauling Describe -. - CITY l of TUKWILA GRADING /FILL � Building Division • , 6200 Southcenter Boulevard + `4• Tu 611 Mashington 98188 (206) 433 -18hi PERMIT APPLICATION Address 6720 Southcenter Boulevard /EXCAVATION CONTROL# }r' (AP Suite# Floor# Name /Tenant of Grading Owner Fort Dent Office Building Assessors Account# 295490 - 0455 -03 John C. Radovich Phone 454 -6060 Address 2000 124th Avenue NE, B -103, Bellevue, WA Zip 98005 same as above Phone 454 -6060 Address Zip /Engineer Address 2000 Mithun— Bowman — Emerich Group Phone 454 -3344 112th Avenue NE, Bellevue, WA Zip 98004 John C. Radovich License# RADOVJC141JH Phone 454 -6060 Address 2000 124th Avenue , B -103, Bellevue, WA Zip 98005 Co. undecided Phone Address Zip the purpose and extent of fill, excavation or grading Proposed Office Building Cut (c.u.) 5500 Fill (c.u.) 300 I CORRECT Applicant Contact *Contractor — Subject to change Two (2) sets of grading /fill /excavation plans must be submitted which meet the application Code. A soils engineering report and ($100.00 Fee) to the Planning Depart- yards or more. /excavation of cubic yards or more. map, and permit fee of $25.00 are required. requirements of Section 7006(d), 1985 Uniform Building engineering geology report may also be required. An Environmental Checklist is required to be submitted ment for any A Hauling permit grading /fill /excavation 500 cubic is required for any grading /fill certificate of insurance, route A $2,000 bond, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AND THAT I HAVE /Authorized Agent Person (please print) HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND THE PROPERTY OWNER' AUT ORIZATION TO DO THIS ORK. (signature) - (:)-Al i .i— Date /1- .3-- 4.- (print name) ohn C. Radovich John Radovich or Katie Greif Phone 454 -6060 FEES: Grading Permit Fee Fee OFFICE USE ONLY (000/322.100) $ I(p2 Q Receipt# Date Paid Excavation TYK. Plan Check Other (000/345.830) .10,0ro Receipt# Date Paid ( ) Receipt# Date Paid Ordinance #1341: NGDATE TOTAL (OWES: $ I CI,2 , 0) ) ❑ Bond Required: $ 1 41 2 ,0 Cert. of Ins. Amount $ IN DATE OUT COMMENTS BLDG \,),, 3 1d/optco £pprove, or ssuance ram PLNG v" ( 'p\ tlk Approved (Initials) SEPA Checklist require : ❑ Yes ❑ No SEPA Determination /140.5 SEPA File# 7 eco xtier PWD \,\p'�� ,�,'>) -k)'∎ Approved (Initials) Wit': Hauling Permit Require: 'Yes ❑ No 99389 SITE REVISIONS • 1 A B SEE SHT 3 af! 40g 1 1 4 a. GREEN R/VER pal BVJ /LP /Alfr' PARK /A16r D/MEWS /ONS -" SEE ,4i '(H /TEGT' PLAN 511T A 1.1 NOe F/ s 4 8 '0 4. a 10 - - -I2 It 4 VICINITY MAP LEGEND: 5r. MH /WM s26.5 /. E. = 12.2, 24" /.E.= 11.5, 27" / NEW /.E.•20.41, 15 "5. 3O EA /5 88.00 er-wer6--4- 26.40 GD x28.60 i i Y M ■ ■ • i ■ i i X i i i ■ ■ i • ■ ■ i ■ O TOP OF CURB ELEV, FLOWL /NE ELEV = TOP OF PAVEMENT ELEV. = SPOT ELEV. = F/RC- HYDRANT 9• :TATS ✓ti.p s H 4'7- 6LOa< £ WNSp0uT 28 6-0 28 -cu 1 F /RST FLOOR F.F. = 29.0 25. /6 60 - E^1 31 r, HTL /NE : orH DO 517707-5 AND FOUND ' /ON DRA 5 ro romm SYS Al. 2700 • r, ijr C, Q/W //VE SEE GENERAL NOTES- SHEET 3 of 3 3Z • 1 / Fr¢E 5prrr.�1 YAuLr, city TUKW/ 67-DS 2q. 4,0 78.1.0 o ,o eke toy/ CITY Or TUUKWILA APPROVED DEC 1 11966 AS NO1EU iiiir ANNA bivi5}ON- 1 1 1 28.00 80 30•30' 27.90 27.40 28.60 27.70 28.00 31. 3o 29.80 PILE COPY royals are that the p'an Chec%'� apP approval of tan• om;s,ions and app' to °tors and vio%atit i of anY �S no; authorize the receipt .e or ordinance. 0.7 a'rn. w/ iMps FIzONT- proved plans acknowledged. Y .. " 2�.. .. ...................... .. .... .... . ate........ '. /••• �. perm', No...... ¢£A• 0.25 x2 o.""icRAM1 -- SPACE' «N /FOf 1LY. use o.3" CsALv(et4a4i'Ge o�'u) Sous 1 1 1 0.75 ".. reips # '&f-OEo TO 75' pzamze a( MAX. 3" . PAC /'./4 ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING 33505 13TH PLACE SO., SUITE 8, FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 TELEPHONE: TACOMA 927 -7850 SEATTLE 682 -4771 i 33 32 31 04.62 5. al, 47.1,3414". 39.20 /5°67 sa Ex''`'1 IBA!, 7-n- Gs SOUTHCENTER BLVD. RECEIVE rrYofTuK T 20 1986 BUPA DEW PLAN 1-11f1/. ALL $TEEL pARRA .44151 210 4,4144 f ASpH. CDA7230 • z �go4)2i. DEBRIS BARRIER DETAIL ( TRASH RACK ) w•..-- 1 11i2 S(L �{i Et t 11 I 6 19 I 3, E T Wt 11111�111 11111L 11 lll19 No. IE iiii llll�f fl�lill��lll�llilillll1(Ill�i�ll1lllil1llll1llll1 MTS PERMIT REVIEW ONLY SHEET OF JOB NO. 41461.31 L 99389 wog fit. ». IMO -7 25:5 Far p.A6•1Z= 7,9 t 24. 0 _ a A NAG at1?M 1�: 21 25 2 P FO/? 4TiI, *TAND"Por 1 OI'4Q,c 264/ EZ.m s Z5.Q '' /1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION POND G4TGw 13•43 /A/ 000 „AO' fit• 1 TEMPORARY GRAVEL CaN$TRL/CrioN � EW n O N.%s. NOTE : 4 /00 Y'E1i R FLOOD El.EV = 21• 9. NO WORK BELOW 6LE V 24.0 FOR PRELOAD 0F• 8IIIL.D /N!f-. v l • -milt 'mu* LEVEL 'II t, 1--, 1 1 "V" DITCH DETAIL R - p'67A8L /at/ .5.I' /5T b ourMAGG 1D G,Q66N rt /va'Q • gig _ oaf �6JH , 0 9,IP O ?r3 =11,. :CBI ' *nr�t.r, ..r raw �1j1.Y � r.•.! rammor 2/ CONSTRUCTION SEQUENC 1. CLEAR AND GRUB TO CLEARING LIMITS, `PROVIDE POSITIVE,ONAINAHE TO SEDINENTAt' TION PONDS. USE FILTER FENCE 114 CONJUNCTION WITH ANY NATIVE VEGETATION AROU,NO : ThE PER I METER. OF THE PROJECT • 2. CONSTRUCT AS REQUIRED SEDIMENTATION,PONDS. INCLUDING OUTLET STRUCTURES TO INSURE THAT SILT FREE WATER LEAVE THE SITE. - 3• CONTINUE TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE" TO SEDIMENTATION.POKDS THROUGH ANY OF THE GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. • 4. USE. "ABSORSANT" AND PROPER DISPOSAL PRACTICES AR ANY FUEL OR OIL LEAKS FROM EQUIPMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION. 5. . AS PERMANENT STORM FACILITIES AND CATCH BASINS ARE COMPLETED, CONSTRUCT ' TEMPORARY FILTER FENCE SEDIMENT FILTERS AROUND EACH CATCH BASIN. 6. MAINTAIN AND CLEAN SEDIMENTATION FACILITIES THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, AS INDICATED BY ANY BUILD -UPS, THOROUGHLY CLEAN THE STORM SYSTEM AT THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. /(I ZL 20 e•• 420 L n[.7E2 FAere /G FEN =E • • DIT4 2k 2q "(s4P PER j0 12/fri = 26..75 /5 a /.9•00 3z R /PRAP PITS/ RNr■z414./CE TO POND ;- 7YP• 31' 2� 32 31 I 33 z1 L /M,rs — TIP: 33 3Z 2q as IIIIIIIIII1II 1 111I111 1111 III IIIII1III 3�I1IIIIII�14 uiliu�iiiilmi imluu iuiliu I 1111 iiiiliiii 1111111 I IIIIIII ill 1 III 1 Ill-i111 5 6 No.18 6":::,:r.fr.- g• 6 III I III I r. r • or ma w:NI' mos ~SC �tiYu,Mt tAPt 1 It/M11 5 NbiM1 swift M wlw awais t"V PAW .4•110,6 AN /MdAi { li re r, °NAKAO Mat M 11110w4, • d'aC %W : Mar° wA°' II •• �Yialrrfei1 . ur. � MUM MY* 441B116 0000 11101146004441 .4. . .N rWs.r.• II 1f t • U rer+ At U ' '� 0&40147 aY ✓mow /vr CITY U T iJiti'v'�il.!{ APPROVED DEC 111986 NJiEU 13111 L DIN = nIVIFinm EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROI..NOTES . 1. ALL LIMITS Of CLEARING AND AREAS OF •VEGETATION PRESERVATION AS PRESCRIBED ON THE PLAN SHALL it CLEARLY FLAGGED IN THE FIELD AND OBSERVED DURINGr CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL REQUIRED SEDIMENTATION/EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES MUST BE CONSTRUCTED .' AND THHAT�SEDIMENT LADEMLWATTER DOES NOT ENTER THERNAt RAAL�DRAINAGE SYSTEM. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A SATISFACTORY CONDITION UNTIL SUCH TIME TWAT CLEARINS AND/OR CONSTRUCTION IS CONFUTED AI POTENTIAL FOR ORBITS. EROSION HAS PA.SSEO. THE .. IMPLEMENTATION, MAINTENANCE, REPLACEMENT ANO ADDITIONS TO EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MIENS SHALL YE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE. 3. THt'EROSION AND SFOIMENTA'ION CONTROL SYSTEMS DEPICTED ON•THIS DRAWING APE INTENDED TO ttE MININAIK REQUIREMENTS TO "MEET ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS,' AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES AND UNEXPECTED OR SEASONAL: CONOIT!ONS DICTATE, THE PERMITTEE SHOULD ANTICIPATE TWAT MORE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION COMM FACILITIES WILL BE p%CESSARY To INSURE COMPLETE SILTATION CONTROL ON THE PROPOSED SITE DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, IT SHALL OE THE OBLIGATION Amp REsPONSIBMATT OF THE PiUNITTEE,TO ADDRESS ANY NEW. CONDITIONS THAT .'KV Bt CREATED MY HIS ACTIVITIES 'AND TO PROVIDE AOD!T1ONAL, FACILITIES, OVER AND ABOVE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT;` A5 WAY•.BE NEEDED T4 PROTECT Amapa FROPERTIhS AND, WATEL: QUAL21Y:6F Tiff RECEIYIN¢ DRAINAGE SYSTEM. 4, APPROVAL 9tr'.TNIS PLAN IS roil EN OSIOMISEDIMENTATION CONTROL ONLY.' 1T DOES. IIOT CONSTITU1 P11 APPMVA OF STGMi OLiA1NA I OESIPN1 S1IEt '10R .LOCATION OF PIPES, RESTRICT':?Q5, CWANI(Ei3 O R IEZON FjACYL1TIES.: 5. iN ANY AREA WHICH HAS BEE1! STRIPPEO Of UEft1AMIOl1 AND WERE NO FORT 'WR WOK IS ANTIC RATED FOR K PERIOD OF-30 DAYS OR' Nelq, ALL DIVINED AREAS 511MUST BE IM�TELY STMU.IZED WITM I+ ,CHINO tARASS .PLANTING Oil OTHER 0W EROS CONTROL TIIEATNENT APRICASL1 TO THE 7Tt Y i QUESTION. GRASS SEED1Ip A LONE {IIII et.ACCEPTAKE 0NI.Y> TNG' ?LON tt3' f APRIL THRU SEATENDEO LiMCLUSlVE. 3E.E011MM NAY PROMO, HOWEVER WHENEVER,. iT Is IN TmEANIENEGt0FAXMB PEN4ITTEE, BUT Nussi $E t.1:OMENtOP WITH . MULCii I NG. NETT C OR ins TtEATIEMT APNOVED et Klee CQUM%Y SURFACE WATp weeEMtOUTSDEt1i.SPtCIF UD TIIe PERIU• . cc* ALL EROSION/SEOIKENTATION CO MIOCbi PODS IMERE. THE OEAQ S MAKE' G(PTH EXCEEDS SIN Sr A HENCE A ;AIIN1NUN OF. 3. FEET NIA, 010:01110. 0 �..■ s ENGINEERING • PLANNING • SURVEYING • t-e pan • 33505 13TH PLACE SO., SUITE 8,' FEDERAL WAY, WASHINGTON 98003 TELEPHONE: TACOMA 927 =7850 LAssocIates SEATTLE 682 -4771 1 11 99389 .41 C'675 /2! ASpHAL.T 4' 6,04sSC/zETE R/M = 27.6o --� ! /CKENED _ �ED T.S. oS /D DET IL t' crroonv cuss y' ~Amer cawelrr0 14'4' *WK emortielaro . IN c.FWfA r0 ffNCI6ICf Y4 r'DO 401MWV • t OP' AOW Cav,q Gylrp ii ,pw 4APPOP for,c4cAmo A0Ar cam P/L L MAMMAL - DEPTH AND rrplE As APPROVE-0 srsoILs ESV//NEtR. EXTRUDED CURB N. T. S PANSION JOINTS CEMENT CONCRETE GUTTEf DET�Q 2" A.C. CLASS 8 pAV/,V& (CON0`. -1Cr '' 2" Ce4's,/ED LFVF:t. /M6 co/./25o ( ) (MIN) CLASS 8 p/T Qu/V 6,ZAVGL C N ) f- --- /2. "o1AM.Ft.Ip 6A715 044TE12f1AN W /STL Sri. 801,T5 AMP Bush /M4 s UNIT $ UNIT T PLAN � r 2 -10 CEMENT CONCRETE CIRM CONSTRUCTION AT CURBS. SECTION 0-0 p-• STAND AR METAL FRAME t ORATE FOR CATCH SA51N MAX. PIPE SIZE AT SECTION A-A • 1• "j AT SECTION • -• ale" ( MAX. PIPE SIZE MAY •E LatiTEo •Y PIPE CONFIGURATIi N ) 59' Cs N 01/(q2 Plow = 25.0 /2" O/G /a/ATa72 sEpARA7'o/ /2" cMP STORM WATER CONTROL M H Y. 54 GENERAL NOTES: . • 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS REQUIREMENTS AND THE LATEST EDITION OF APWA STANDARDS 6 SPECIFICATIONS. 2. LOCATIONS SHOWN OF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VERIFY LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS TO AVOID DAMAGING EXISTING UTILITIES. . 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. 4. BENCHMARK: N.C.S. NON., D-4081, DISC ON SOUTH FACE OF THE SOUTH OF 6 CONCRETE SUPPORS. PIERS `ON CENTERLINE OF UNDERPASS OF INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY 405 - HIGHWAY 181 x9.734. 5. ALL TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY PER ASTM TEST D -1557. 6. DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 50. 7. FILL AREAS SHALL BE SCARIFIED AND COMPACTED IN 6" LIFTS TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY PER ASTM TEST D -1557. • 8. EXTRUDED CURBS SHALL BE KING'COUNTY STANDARD DRAWING 00. 9. 9. ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL BE TESTED FOR CORRECT NATEP RUNOFF BY FLOODING 114 ORDER TO PROVE ADEQUATE SLOPING AND SHAPING OF PAVEMENT. • 10. CATCH BASINS TYPE I AND TYPE II REFER TO APWA STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 11. ALL ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM. 12. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS NOTED WITH APWA CLASS "C" BEDDING MINIMUM. A. 8" SHALL BE ALUMINUM, HELICAL 18 GA. WITH "1 -1 /2 "X 1/4" CORRUGATIONS. B. 12" 4 18" SHALL BE ALUMINUM, HELICAL 16 GA. WITH • 2 -1/4 "X1/2" CORRUGATIONS. ALL STORM PIPE SHALL HAVE RECORRUGATED ENDS AND RUBBER GASKET CONNECTIONS. V z } m W • vl z o z u.1 z LI J J . a. • I LI el Z L, E2 W M w Z. M C5 z WASHINGTON 96003 FEDERAL WAY, TELEPHONE: TACOMA 927 -7850 SEATTLE 682 -4771 1 r CROSS SECTIONS - GREEN RIVER TO BUILDING NO1 POR DETAILS OF REINFORCEMENTS AN, IRSTALLAT14N1 SEE A PNI: A STO. SPE- CIPICATIONS SECTION 49 3/ ' /3' 2o` f/AJ. FL R. = 2 9.O 00 PIOT SCALE 3o_ • 4 zs F" /2E' LANE - sir : -N /S 27 J • SECTION A -A C.B. TYPE •1 /2000 CFS FLOW ELEV. _ 2/.7 9 ,t/A4Tive .'wriA/v �GE?Z 4A, v2 1 pG PLAN agc-rIoP4 a -e. gaoa cps pt•ou/ EL.EV. /7.9 EX /ST: SLOPE" MASS a P/; frUN SECTION A-A / /3' 20' <o 0 0 -.4 FRAME AND GRATE . E. $GtoN SECTION. ' Id1N11T 1' UNIT • r Ia- f /N. FL 2. = 29.0 %2E 2...4)V6.7 // 2.4, SECTION B-.B TOP SLA• CITY Of TUKWILA r r r1 DEC 1.11986 1 MJ nvICL 66ILOING DIVISI TN PRECAr QIIANHOLE SEC - TION. SEE EEC. 0A 2.00 M '- ?- tjTLET Pre. PRECAST MANHOLE SASE SECTION. WEE SPEC 0 S 2.09 A MAW. PIPE 21 I.D. (MAx. MPE SItn MAY •E LIwTTO BY PIPE CONFIGU1IATIONI 00 MOT SCALE C•Bir . TYPE 4515 trr OF TUKWILA OCI 2001986 MUM, t` SHEET t:__.' I I1II1 !II IIIIIIIIIIII 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIIIIIII 3 1 dm1iuilui1iiiilmi imlim iiii 8 Ali IIIIIIir iI1A1II 1 11111 11111 111I1I1 :J l 4t No.18 f`.«•' ".. L 8 ; fi' l; Z wi 3 OE 10B NO. 41461.20