Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 5315 - La Vista Estates Apartments - Foundation RepairCITY OF TUKWILA Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 - IS4P9 BUILDING PERMIT (RexCu✓/) FOUNDATION STABILIZATION OF BUILDING Work to be done Site Address Building Use Property Owner Address Contractor Address PERMIT # Control # 88 -176 5555 S. 152ND ST. N/A WINTON & ASSOCIATES Suite # Tenant LA VISTA ESTATES Assessors Account # 115720- 0221 -0 Phone # 242 -9500 Zip 98188 Phone # 255 -9416 E(VTON. W Zip 98056 15245 PACIFIC HWY S. SEATTLE, WA DOCHNA{(L CONST. #DOCHNC -241R9 13020 LAKE KATHLEEN RD S.E. FOR BUILDING PERMIT ONLY Approved for Issuance By: S q • Ft. sT t FT: Office Stor W hou areage/ se Retail Other Occ. Load ' ' 2nd Fl. 3rd F1. , ota _ Fire Protection: ❑ Sprinklers [] Detectors Zoning Type of Construction Special Conditions TS. Date: 23- ees sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. 1st F1 2nd F 1 other other Total Valuation of Construction Bldg. Permit Fee Plan Check Fee Demolition Surcharges Other Other TOTAL s s s $ 9,600 Receipt 0t/10 $ 117.00 Receipt # 3743 S 76.00 Receipt 0 $ Receipt #eTW S 3.50 Receipt 0 S Receipt 0 S $ 196.50 FUR SIGN PERMIT ONLY [] Permanent ❑ Temporary [] Single Face ❑ Double Face [] Wall Mounted Building face Setbacks: Front Square Footage of each sign face Special Conditions [(Free Standing [] Other Side Side Rear Total square footage of sign THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL ANO VOI$ IF WORK ON CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, 011 IF ABANDONtU FuR A PERIOD OF 180 OAVS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION A110 KNOW THE SAME TO 11 TRITE ANO CORRECT. GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL K COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN ON NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT VIOLATE L THE P�1011 S 9F 1V OTHER STATE OR LOCK LAY REGULATING CONSTRUCTION ON i fined e/)-1((74A o- s1 Da.■v 2e- CONSTRUCTION UR LAURA IS ,.50E,U(3 oil ALL PROVISIONS OF LAYS ANU ORDINANCES DOES NOT PRESUME TU GIVE Aur.ORITY ro THE PERFOOMANCE OF CONStRUCTION. LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am 1c tAed under prow ons 0 he liminess and Professions CON, and my IiC.nfe is in full force and effect. Contractor (signature)_. /� �S' ----- ^- —••- .. OWNER- BUILDER DECLARATION ( ) 1, as owner of the property. or my employes. with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the Structure is not +nded or offered for sale. ( 1 I. es owner of the property, ma exclusively contracting with licensed Contractor's t0 Construct the project. Owner (signature) Date CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433• iSAP9 BUILDING PERMIT (Revak) Work to be done FOUNDATION STABILIZATION OF BUILDING PERMIT # Control # 88 -176 T Site Address T. Building Use N/A Property Owner WINION & ASSOCIATES Address 15245 PACIFIC HWY S. SEATTLE, WA DOCHNANL CONST. #DOCHNC -241R9 13020 LAKE KATHLEEN RD S.E. S uite enant LA VISTA ES Assessors Account # 115720 - 0221 -0 Contractor Address FOR BUILDING PERMIT ONLY Approved for Issuance By: S Ft. 4 • • Office scorhi Warehouse Retail Other Occ. Load 1st Fl. Znd Fl. _ 3rd F1. _ Total Fire Protection: ❑ Sprinklers ❑ Detectors Zoning Type of Construction Special Conditions TON. TES • Phone # 242 -9500 Zip 98188 Phone 0 255 -9416 Zip_ 98056 Date: 73 -YY ees sq. ft. a 1st F1. S sq. ft. A 2nd F1. S sq. ft. P other $ sq. ft. 6 other S Total Valuation of Construction S 9,600 Bldg. Permit Fee Receipt # Y(4 S 117.00 Plan Check Fee Receipt # 3743 S 76.00 Demolition Receipt 0 S Surcharges Receipt #L/C156 S 3.50 Other Receipt 0 S Other Receipt 0 S TOTAL S 196.50 FOR SIGN PERMIT ONLY ['Permanent ❑ Temporary ['Single Face ❑ Double Face ❑ Wall Mounted ['Free Standing ❑ Other Building face Setbacks: Front Side Side Rear Square Footage of each sign face Total square footage of sign Special Conditions THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND vin II WORK ON CONSTRICTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 1110 OATS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION uR rURK IS •..SJEhUEJ OR ABANOONtU Fug A PERIOD OF 1M OAti AT AN/ TINE AFTER WON* IS COMMENCED. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT l Met READ AND ERAMINEO THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAIL TO III TIUI AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS *NU )ROINANCES GOVERNING THIS TTPI OF WORK WILL III COMPLIED WITH WHITHER SPECIFIED HEREIN ON NOT. THE ORANTlNa p A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GlvE AuT .,0NITr TO VIOLATE LPL L THE OVIi' OTHER STATI ON LOCAL LAY REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. ' -- Oats 62- 2° - ��gned ! l hereby affirm that 1 • Contractor lsignature)_ CONTRACTORS DECLARATION under proZoM o Business and ProfNStost Code, and q IlcMff issiiinn full force and effect. a-Q s�� Oats rte- 08- dS.i_ OWNER- BUILDER DECLARATION ( ) I. as owner of the property, or ey eeployeet, with wages as their Sole coodeesetlo0. will do the wort. and the structure is not ^'" aea o, offered for sale. ( l 1. as owner of the property, r exclusively contracting with licensed contractor's to construct the project. Owner (Signature)_ __ _ Date — CITY. QV TUKWILA Building Division B62®D Southcenter Boulevard .Tukwila. Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Type of Inspection Site Address 5 S s Requester Special Instructions .... V�. ............ .......w...�.....r..w..wv. -...r urvw.v.... w.s�.,+.....n.r.�nc..,nn.•.�n. ran. er[ avWM� ..nri.- wtMm+wrbY.grunit.n:.44 INSPECION RECORD 3 �s -7— As `01 PERMIT # Date Date Wanted mac. 7-1E-84 Project t.4 B/Ls Phone # -a-5-s' 7 i7' Inspection Results /Comments: Inspector 1 Date ;7/5-/ r8 .CITY'O T F UKWILA Building :Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washlnaton 98188 '1206)433 -1849 .NeSS1YX'CS't'i10a.: uvwn .a.sw mkt XnxSU• tN�w .ure�hkf'l."+T.X.!t§:.'�:;N.:�: INSPECTIVI RECORD 7///cPS2 PERMIT # S 3 /5 A /% ft)': ///47 Date - .'"" o� Type of Inspection / Date Wanted rte', - �3�-,� a/�.m� p.m. Site Address S S �� Ls Project `41 (/-`,- .a 6t.:- .. � Phone # ;2) 5- � -- 7 'i' ( Special Instructions Requester Inspection Results /Comments: 0/1- / U % 3W/' a roi) / 11/4 /,�/�S Inspector Date /V /� 'THE FOLLOWING COMMENT ,(PPLY TO AND BECOME PART OF THE APPROVED PLANS UNDER TUKWILA BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER 53/5" . NO CHANGES WILL BE MADE TO PLANS UNLESS APPROVED BY ARCHITECT AND TUKWILA BUILDING DEPARTMENT. 2'. ALL PERMITS TO BE POSTED. AT JOB SITE PRIOR TO START OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. . ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE DONE IN CONFORMANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS AND REQUIREMENTS' OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE (1985 EDITION), UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE (1985 EDITION), WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE (1986 • EDITION, AND WASHINGTON STATE REGULATIONS FOR BARRIER FREE FAILITIES (1986 EDITION). 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE BARRICADES FOR PROTECTION FOR PUBLIC AS PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 44, UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. 1 * c'3 -17Co \Gr: LA VI `ETA T 7T4TEs Aprs. £ 'D /it/ANCE CoMpadintE / 'A/ ✓Norte oN N10 2 5 - 741 Cr, OcciPccJ1(ip Z to or Co4,6T�. 3 OLCYJfIO Ott 'FRCP 4 01-eatt/N9-6TORIO OvsOoR AREA (19 0-'mumin.0.460: •• W oiz.K t,c� '4. L \ M t TS Coet- e.. "1:1-De,, 3. 7 �'DEfIk11,ED CCG•REQMfCS N G. 8 07 TAPE cfaiisTRAZeamm COVE ge.c . fNcoNeF.RINc.i Rca. -60z1'4111-50 - I4AJNoN 4&tvoi ►N RNI\(INCI RERogt, 'l1 NG4 �� E :0 W.S.E.G. N.A�c�Ftc�- L d N 1- 11,MaLATCt t ik-4 t c.q IJSCp 'Tth15 jsTE RESULTS ES ULTS 041717 51 -Io WAG V4l4. Co11 z MGD 131,eoeo AC OF SIAAN1\lott cuil..c701,1 SySTEf �SWLTS Ovl cetstresMEO App(', �� -t_61s, 1,tA9port/Ep As 'De. _?_ BEo NorE PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY: CLIENT: DUCHNAHL CONSTRUCTION 13020 LAKE KATHLEEN .ROAD RENTUN, WASHINGTON 98056 ATTENTION: MR. RON NOLTON SUBJECT: PILE LOAD TEST TWO -It.CH PIPE PILE 20212 41ST PLACE NORTHEAST KING COUNTY PREPARED BY: PACIFIC TESTING LABORATORIES 3220 - 17TH AVE NLE WEST SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98119 APR IL 27, 1987 CERTIFICATE NO. 8704 -0035 P5C VE CITY OF TUK'WILA `JUN 0 i )8,3 p� y � �y y� �qry� (.: c f OUILOLNG •vutr. NATHAN MARSH, P•E•, ASSISTANT MANAGER INSPECTION DEPARTMENT CALVIN C• WEISS, M, INSPECTION DEPARTME UT ES C• F RESIDENT PACIFIC TESTING LABORATORIES ---. April 27, 1987 Certificate No. 8704 -0035 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION SYNOPS IS SCOPE OF WORK REFERENCES AND CONTROLS. MEASUREMENTS AND METHOD OF OPERATIONS ADDITIONAL RELEVANT DATA CONCLUS ION APPENDIX PILE REFUSAL LOG SHEET LOCATIONS OF PILES AND REFERENCES SHANNON & WILSON REPORT PAGE NO. 1 2 Al A2 A3 PACIFIC TESTING LABORATORIES-1 c-17 co April 27, 1987 Certificate No. 8704 -0035 PILE LOAD TEST TW0 -INCH PIPE PILE 20212 41ST PLACE NORTHEAST KING COUNTY SYNOPS IS Test Pile No. 1 (see Sheet A2) Was loaded to a minimum of 200 per - cent of design load with a 24 -hour penetration of less than 0.04 inch. Additional relevant data indicate Test Pile No. 1 behaved acceptably when compared with Shannon i Wilson's report and with King County pile settlement criteria. SCOPE OF WORK Pacific Testing Laboratories (PTL) was hired to monitor a pile load test applied to a two -inch outside diameter, iron pipe test pile, to interpret this data and to compare the results with Shannon & Wilson's report, "Small Diameter Pipe Piles" by Herman H. Druebert and George Yamane. REFERENCES AND CONTROLS Though Pacific Testing Laboratories has a dial indicator capable of readings to 0.001 inch, the numbers obtained would be in question as this dial indicator must be anchored to a controlled, predictable reference structure. It was judged that: 1) proximity to a yielding wood retaining wall; 2) nearness to the existing house; 3) potential foot traffic interference; 4) fabricating a sturdy wood -frame reference structure with questionable anchoring stability; and 5) the unknown behavioral response of nearby soils and wood retaining wall to four, two foot by two foot by six foot concrete anchor blocks (approximately 3,600 pounds each block), secured by chain to a W 8 -35 steel beam used to anchor ,the loading hydraulic jack over the test pile, would permit both excessive and unknown movements in the anchorage reference structure of the dial indicator. The selected method of operation was to choose a special location on the one - quarter inch thick steel bearing plate (placed and centered over the test pile) and use a rod (also marked for consistency in readings) read by a level or transit. Three separate reference elevations, "A," "B" and-"Cy (see Sheet A2) were used as controlled references for taking penetration measurements. A fourth reference was two stakes driven into soil approximately two .feet each side of PACIFIC TEITMIO LABORATORIE6, .. : ._ • ' • Aril 27, 1987 Certificate No. 8704 -0035 Page 2 the test pile with a tensioned string pulled between the two stakes over the bearing plate with a reference mark made on the string and bearing plate for consistency in location of readings. MEASUREMENTS AND METHOD OF OPERATIONS A minimum four -ton test load (see 'Sheet A6), twice the design load, was . applied using a hydraulic jack (cross - sectional area of 2.236 square inches) capable of 8,000 pounds.per,:aquare inch. 4 ton = 8,000 pounds = 3,578 psi 3,600 psi minimum 2.236 square inches ' At 1:13 p.m. on April 22, 1987, initial readings were taken prior to load application. Immediately after load application (3,800 pounds per square inch times 2.236 square inches equals 8,496 pounds- - okay)-, four elevation readings were again taken. The final read- ings were taken 24 -hours later. TABLE 1 4/22/87 4/23/87 4/22/87 1:13 P.M. 1 :20 P.M. NO LOAD 3,800 PSI 3,800 PSI PENETRATION EFERENCE READING INITIAL READING FINAL READING (INCH) A 30 inches 30 -3/16 inches 30 -1/4 inches 1/16 = 0.06 B 30 -1/16 inches 30 -1/4 inches 30 -9/32 inches 1/32 = 0.03 C 56 -7/16 inches 56-5/8 inches 56 -21/32 inches 1/32 = 0.03 String 1/4 inch 7/16 inch 7/16 inch 0 The writer understands that permissible penetration after 24 hours cannot exceed 0.04 inch. The average of the four, 24 -hour penetra- tion readings is less than 0.04 inch. ADDITIONAL RELEVANT DATA 1 . O n April 14, 1987, the writer was called t o the job site to .ver- ify refusal of the 10 production (Nos. 1 -7 and :9; . 1) . =.:sad Ahree 'tests (No. 8,-Test No. 1 and ;Test No. ":2);piles ?per ° anon; ;- MCIFIC mama LAB0IUT01ms April 27, ..1987 Certificate No. 8704 -0035 Page 3 Wilson's "less than one -inch penetration for one minute of con- tinuous driving" (see sheets A6 and All). The results (see Sheet Al) are that substantially less than one - inch penetration in five minutes, thirty seconds of continuous driving was obtained for all piles, except Test Pile No. 1; the test pile load tested.. Test Pile No.';�1=penetrated 3.5 inches in five minutes and thirty seconds :-of continuous driving... After this pile refusal test, the contractor ,reapplied continuous driving 'to all piles; ,however, the ;writer was not ' icasent '.to ., . :witness this. .. � r" . ,After the 24-hour loaded test pile, final elevation readings, the contractor wanted to load the same-test pile to .`failure to gain information in estimating "an ultimate strength." The following results were obtained: TABLE 2 LOAD PENETRATION (INCH) APPROXIMATE TIME INTERVAL AT LOAD (MINUTES) REMARKS 3,800 psi (8,496 pounds) 0 psi (0 pounds) 3,800 psi (8,496 pounds) 5, 300 psi (11,850 pounds) 6,200 psi (13,863 pounds) 0 psi (0 pounds) 1/32 0 1 /3 2 2 /3 2 3/32 3 5 10 IMP 24 -hour final reading and beginning test elevation reference. unloaded reload to test load. additional load. additional load; safety and potential damage said "stop test." unloaded - -no permanent deformation observed. PACIFIC . TESTING . LABORATORIES April 27, 1987 Certificate No. 8704-0035 Page 4 Test Pile No. 1 experienced elastic behavior with no permanent deformation when loaded in excess of 3.5 times pile design load. The pile subcontractor, hnahl Construction, has 'a :field .1!?g tation -1,1 ia '.i.aches) i'lai. ,•lia4 likin!'t* :1). ...:: sheet indicating ,Pile:Pene-- . ,..--tatiii;,t ilie e.;:iiikciiii*,01:0-taa '47, pile driving • .: ....„iiiii-m;104-;,and;,Apixx: , brought with an s'agbV/TiiPPW141,...-- , • . - .:.4....-'''...:3‘ ,, ,,-:.' ‘. lieen iiikel '*iD '.11uP14Y __.: iliti,;i4A4,,iiii:,a2-...:14r •::'",,,i7:iitiefiticin as *on :':as r”,-;,,it.t.„,.:„..,..;:,..'4: ' .4wew:,,_.k..f .,... : • 1. ., .. ' . ;,,:x...:.Y.;744',,,,:../m1:-,::•:;,:405.11,..:ApiT..,;( - , ,„ e.e . :, ..),....1'4:.lich,,,q,,er.;., • r . .. ,!`,;.:1 ' '. ," : ,,',':;':, ,,,,r.:', f. ,•:':4`,i;' `‘ :,iifi.,place ,....1-',4pile:;.ko .,.....= *.,; ,.........: .. 9: three -Pile ••,': P 1. The general '!°-nC.F.,1!?.r'''1,,.'„lia' 'pi.),, p11. Cap containing etiii,tI*!° r 0 4* TOU_ II arith :::!,........:; , .,. --- ,, ,,, i,:....,' steel in bOth:direc tio*i aver ,-,aa6,11 Tile. .... ::'.1.,, :-. ,',., -.:: , • ,,..;,-,,.,,e.,,,, .., • • 1 •." • • • • • • • • ' " .,cohrLus ION Tait- data indicate Test Pile o. 1 does behave acceptably in ;accordance with the Aannon &:ifilson'VeCiausendattoill#d '.County' s cr.teria. =,;Should you bave any ,s4atietatiOns,'!:iiteale ,bantact. ,Jonathan Harsh, P.E., Pacific : Testing Laboratories at -6666. END OF REPORT TEXT • .. iflOOC ttke QV •t »K L• /Si -.ep35 4., Pitt 1151 RA Mir Or NAKMkR P.51 Pi I.fi Pwairnurnow (f N C N) li VAI1FP um IF • ?WI. -$K. fttoutiescs If - I At -87 tut 75 -76 1.104 THAN Yu out* t2WJo- 4256 gmul- 3444 . Sr" hAr+Mek/L .' � 7s-76 s �6 ,KEN 12.14.12VC* ,Shur - 700,C. M� M•� sss�r *V it. . ' 76 ps l Los rMAk I46 rata tan 12415:)66 S MK( srbIPY rmro 76 PSI _ y' 7 S- 7 - I t6 Ixce+ �1 tZS i - 13oZr3o sot •Na -3O#. 57t,-y A HM kpi s 73 -7C Lc_," , of .K KG t SO' - 1101:30 SN/AI — 301vG FA1IP.GY s>I'ADY oo40 c 6 70 - 73 LeSS , irn v 1l 6 Ow - 23/5 :20 Sat tw - 'Awe • ( 7 X 70 -7 1 vg1317- 1322-:5o Sk hr - 3oslx , k 5 70 -- 72. LESS 7HllM Vi 6 132Z-13:30 31 s-Am - 30s‘pC. : •— : i I0 6 q- 711 “-ss rMwk /6 1;33- 03g: i0 ;Pt,g. -3asx. -4'4C II �0 - 73 Vtf4S ',MAW 16 13 MG- 1345:30 s.1 i w- 30sk. •W 8 yIP rose Piz -.-- Ai f 61-- 7 Z -- -- . r : 1 n f. US$ 7e+at, t 6 On' .-- 010030 S N oil - Whig. i3 w7 - 1352:110 gql 471-07:10 - ware- oev at Au, PL`e t Hw DOWLal ' "So srmhn0 N6 0 , _. _k._n / tie 111-Ere '— . *me- cv;0 a�' � LOCATIONS OF PILES AND REFEREWES SHANNON i WILSON REPORT ;INTRODUCTION SMALL DIAMETER PIPE. PILES by Herman H. Druebert1, George Yamane2 Over the pest several years, or underpinn rting eelativ • ,,w ,,,Suer • : f fist ; a.,-h One to'-,, two -story Ipartment or office ompetent "bearing :layer :"`leoeat 'Isis of installing '2-;Inch diameter'p :Ibuilding loads to the bearing stratum. fpm pile system was eonoeivsd r ,the r e Os i om �ifn attieie 'appearing in a Swedish 'Geoteehnical Institute' �ou nal :d i 'ing the %we'of 1 diameter by 30 -foot long reinforcing rods to support residenees constructed over soft sensitive clays. r ‘ , . .., This paper describes design considerations for using 2 -inch diameter pipe piles, installation procedures, and footing underpinning and support details. DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS The 2 -inch diameter pipe pile support system Is particularly adaptable to conditions where access is restricted but it requires that structure loads are such that he load per pile does not exceed about *,Dori and that • suitable bearing layer exists at relatively shallow depth (about 30 feet). 1Herman H. Druebert, Senior Principal Seattle, WA 2George Yamane, Vice President, Shannon & Engineer, Shannon .:ac Wilson, Wilson, Inc., tosatti• "Smell Diameter Pipe lilts . • by •.Y. Oruebirt.piptr pr., e,..sen ts d ot the American Society of Civil tngineers Convention and :t Y Portland, Oregon, ' SO. ' ' ti�� Installation of the 2 -inch pipes requires • jack hammer, air hose, and air compressor. This equipment is compact and mobile allowing installation of the piles in areas of restricted head room and space. For example, the air compressor can be parked in a driveway or on the street and a length of air hose selected so that • jack hammer can be used where required for installing footing underpinning or support. A design bad of .2 tons per pile is used for designing footing underpinning Figures 1, 2, and 3 show results of bad tests performed a various bearing soils in the Seattle area. :piles driven into The pipe underpinning piles are generally considered as 'end bearing since they normally penetrate soft or loose soils overlying the hearing titratum. -fin some eases, 'however, they penetrate relatively compactA / oils overlylnp the'bearing stratum or through a weathered phase of the bearing strata such that a portion of their ultimate capacity would be derived from skin friction. The pile in test A shown on Figure 1 and the piles in tests B and C shown on Figure 2 would be considered to derive their capacity from end bearing. This results in ultimate bearing capacity of the bearing soils to be on the order of 150 F tons per square foot. The pile in test B shown on Figure 1 and the piles in tests A and B shown on Figure 3 would be considered to derive their capacity from both end bearing and skin friction. The maximum length of installed and load tested pipe piles for Shannon & Wilson projects has been on the order of 30 feet. Subsurface explorations are performed prior to the selection of 2 -inch diameter pipe piles for footing underpinning or support, to determine pile lengths and the characteristics of the bearing material. Explorations normally consist of borings, prober or test pits. Interviews with the owner and /or contractor may also provide informative data .regarding earthwork ;procedures during construction and site conditions prior to construction. INSTALLATION The pipe piles are driven with an t0 to 90 pound jack hammer to whatever depth is necessary to reach the specified driving resistance (1 -ineh or .less of • penetration for one minute of continuous .driving): Standard threaded couplings are ...Allied to eonnect pipe sections. The pipe sections should be-butted together In about {;the center of the coupling to avoid strippi the thrsillel url bi is hots Jt'x .more Cur .f rb is nit the bottom of ``footln�s as'ihown ,.441.)„r i.,s. /ev. ,,;close to the footing u protrusion-of allow as near a vertical orientetion'as • enerally ranges from about 2 to set tenter' :tol;. bout .1.5 :feet `center` to'eenter replaces or'brick trimmed Malls. tit Norm s'1ly remov c between3nei �'�5 � �1 ':iil't�?��V•� -f 'f�C ��, Y ?ti`f,C:��iwr�,��" th" iest steeeturs �.rT3•ixrp:�+._...rir�.n.syy .....tr .. .. ., n vi-' [ '"� of new „�onstruetton; the' pike "�ire'netalle�l, f" uirl Y i.. uJJ'..:w4',i�.a ... ... �.. ...wi•• -STi i.Mrtr....,t++k^1vMiVN. bcYtl+ i6/ iiw011�{i.•Ji�- i+....��•�I���� Ii4 Fag .constructed over them.f Following driving, the piles are cut to length to a]ow for clearance for the levelling systetn. There are two methods that are used for levelling and transferring footing loads to the piles. One system consists of attaching a screw jack assembly in the pipes and then laterally jacking and centering it beneath a footing. The second method consists of jacking up the footing and then laterally jacking and shimming the pipes beneath the footing. Screw jacks and /or shims as well as the tops of piles are protected in a backfill of cement.mortar. At least one load test is performed at the start of installation to confirm the 2 -ton allowable load carrying capacity assigned to the piles . es ” """ 4 ,carried to twice the design .load of the pair'. The load tests are performed .using the existing footing (with a steel beam provided beneath the footing to distribute the reaction load) as a reaction. For new construction, driven :piles are:^ ` ' as anchor piles. umo st,C 1 Pt 1 NIS. c4Se !!!!!!!1 • ' The dimensions and properties of 2-Inch galvanised standard weight, extra strong, and double-extra strong pipe are shown in Table 1. TABLE 1 2-INCH PIPE 'DIMENSIONS AND PROPERTIES dard39. .154 ..,;0.2111 2.375 .1:939 2 .11.4 :668 0.73l v,41):17si , A 11 Double Extra Strong 2 2.375 1.503 0.436 .1.03 2.66 1:31 1.10 0.703 A - Cross-sectional area - Nioment of Inertia S - Elastic section modulus r - Radius of gyration The 2-inch pipe is manufactured in 21-foot lengths but is available from the supplier at whatever lengths are desired, depending on the overhead space available for installation. Normally contractors use 5 to 7 foot lengths for installation since special scaffolding would be required for the ▪ jack hammer operator during driving. For most of the Shannon & Wilson projects 2-inch standard weight pipe has been used for underpinning or support. However, extra strong pipe was used in one or two instances where hard driving was anticipated. Small diameter pipe piles provide an economical means for underpinning or supporting relatively light structures in areas where access and working space are 'restricted and an adequate bearing layer is at • sufficiently shallow depth. ( .. .. . • - ID OMNI • 1111)11311113/1 1- I■••• 11.• 2 trg Era, • . • MP • Mr •.' „ 11111 nal • 1.11311112 1 1.• OD Ow ... e.. firhar.- ligii‘CteC"cin MA ft. fre ft. se; • in ••• ........r.611.1 rip • ••■••• an 111 g 1 el fag IP .N. a. el. ▪ 110* tea 1 • .i■ III e :1 ..: lit• die . 1 III , '' : ' 74 ,•,:',.4.411 , ; , . ' • - - : :: :a ..ot ..1-.;;!•.;.,..r,Ft-,,, i'••• ',':7.,A1,11411 .. WNW. ''.:). " ;2 • • 1 1.1 (0) 1N11 - 0111 t 1' c 4' t 1't 1• /t'1 1 1 19111,11 11( 01011 11 1111 131A110 111/ '1 1'1 41M31 3114 1117 7111/ 11 11111 0111 431111 3111 . .-_ s• p 1'p s• • (9I 51111 - 0111 ""r �• �y...0 — �� �ti Ts...... 1341VN 1314 ONflOJ 01 4111 434110 1114 'LA 11 N13N31 3114 ON17 35431 11111 01 311131 'LA 1 40131 1111 '11 51 S41I1I1413 3911YfSlflf moli s • _ � 131111 1011 011111 11 11111 011111 1114 31 11 113111 1114 0111 1411 Ii 11131 1111 • • 11 1 411111 1111111M 17141011111~ s• p 1'p s• • (9I 51111 - 0111 I 1' 1 .1 1'1 • (Y) SI1N► -01011 • • • r/ 1 es / r ml es ""r �• �y...0 — �� �ti Ts...... 1341VN 1314 ONflOJ 01 4111 434110 1114 'LA 11 N13N31 3114 ON17 35431 11111 01 311131 'LA 1 40131 1111 '11 51 S41I1I1413 3911YfSlflf moli s • _ 1' 1 .1 1'1 • (Y) SI1N► -01011 • • • r/ 1 es / r ml es 1 1'1 1't ,•, 1 a 4'1 t 4.1 1' 1 1 1 ._ 1.1 suosUT►ACE IIONDITIONS 00 . 7111 1ELOI 1 F1. RIIII 1E11OE TO 11118E YNO 7111 LENCI1 11 ►1. 7111 01111 11T11 Of FO017 IACI MANE R « 1.1 11.1 1.3 1 1 1.5 1.10 - TINS (A) • 1.1 4.1 V.0.2 1.3 4.1 1111 - IONS (B) 4.5 ._ 1. ---- SUISURFACE C111E II IONS 04 FT. FILL 1E1OT 5 F1. OUSE TO TER1 KNEE SAND FILE LENGTH 1.1 FT. FILE DRIVEN 111111 11 FOUND IACI MADE F FILE DRIVEN INT0 STIFF TO MIRE CLAY PIL1 IEMCTM 1.5 FT. PI IIRIVEN 11111 It POUND LASS CI NAII11 ---111 i V.0.2 1.3 4.1 1111 - IONS (B) 4.5 LOAD - TONS (C) 4.1 4.1 ---- FILE DRIVEN INT0 STIFF TO MIRE CLAY PIL1 IEMCTM 1.5 FT. PI IIRIVEN 11111 It POUND LASS CI NAII11 ---111 i LOAD - TONS (C) 4.1 4.1 JIB 3EFIECTIOI - INCITES ODUCTA. - INCTE$ r .. a� - a- a PM a MO S 1.s IAN a; = we el r r = g w a Mi 00 O O ® ©o O O FIG. • C1TT OF TUKWILA 8uilditing Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (k06) -433 -1849 Site Address .� BUIL NNG PERMIT APPLICV "ION Control # Project Name /Tenant x,11 �rT r_. F- -z l Valuation of Construction Property Owner \/<<,_; c„•_• Address j 'J�.. �•� ; %�_; Applicant Ic,CY-a Assessors Account# Suite# r vo , ��1c L ; i 1, l�. rr/r "` Address \=:::c <:( ) I;;. ti_.;; Floor# / /572O-- Dg ? /-c2 Phone '41Z -at S Zip Phone Zip ; ` L--., Architect /Engineer -- { Phone Address Contractor Address License# Zip Phone Zip Class of Work: 0 New ❑ Addition ❑ Tenant Improvement ❑ Remodel (residential) n Reroof ❑ Demolition 0 Interior Demolition [J Other "t: -. 1,.-.;v?1».- rr,_t 1 "PAIsti . Describe work to be done tic c:�t "\-24—% . r = l_- �l c� • Type of Const. (UBC) Occ. Group (UBC) 12f-1/4 Square footage of entire building Square footage of tenant space Building Use Will there be a change of use? Yes el No If yes, describe change of use, including square footages of changed areas Will there be storage or use of flammable, combustible or hazardous materials on the premise or area of construction? ❑ Yes prNo If yes, explain I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT AND THAT I HAVE THE PROPERTY OWNER'S AUTHORIZATION TO DO THIS WORK. Applicant /Authorized Agent (signature) `.:,,J) ; - ,.._. ,. ; A.,). .-°-( \(4.71C.77-7 Date -( -- gep (print name) I Contact Person (please print) t h 0Ln— u4,_1 Phone 'ZSS - -14 l t OFFICE USE ONLY FEES: Building Permit Fee (000/322.100) $ / /./..90 Receipt# ' Date Paid ' Plan Check Fee (000/345.830) /1,0,00 Receipt# --7,-)/4-) Date Paid C, - 9 'i, Bldg Code Sur Charge (000/386.904) 3.50 Receipt# Date Paid Energy Sur Charge* (000/386.907) Receipt# Date Paid Other ( ) Receipt# Date Paid *New construction only TOTAL J9 /Djj70 (OWES: $ /ojp, 60 ) SQUARE FOOTAGE /BUILDING USE INFORMATION Square Foota•- of Entir- Building: FLOO'• USE Occ T : S$.FT. OCC LLD GC-C USE Occ T .: SI.FT. LOAD USE 0 T •: So FT OCC sib TOTAL SI.FT. TOTAL OCC. TOTA TRACKING DEPT. DATE IN DATE OUT COMMENTS BLDG ✓(p- 11/ -St 6-21-e6 'pprove. or ssuance - 1, , ype o onst. To Mahan: Date Approved: 6-01--t??? FIRE Approved (Initials) Per letter dated Fire Protection: ❑ Sprinklers Approved (Initials) 0 Detectors • BAR ❑LAND USE /SEPA CONDITIONS PLNG Zoning Setbacks: N S E W Parking stalls required for: Site Tenant Space Parking stalls provided: Site Tenant Space ADDITIONAL PARKING STALLS REQUIRED: PWD Approved (Initials) Per letter /plans dated • •••••■•••••••••••■••i•vm••■•••■•••••••••■••••••■••••• • 1 ES e. e. 0 1 2 • - • +„ 4. .4 :4 4 1 • ••• • tu tr 1 • s•-• 0 100. 042' E A et D $1, • *4 0. I. 60.- 6.0.1. thirre kas. 4, 19, 900 4sif 1 1 o. t •CIPIEVIVIONIMMOVENVIVvVIVONI 4 I) 2 • • -5 • t .e. th.wre" ta 4;4,9 tit' E4e 4.). 97 0 (11V shirr4 d 9 82. I a' 116. u , ' ; 4 , tiwre rg 1 4. trittett. St 1 it tt 411 t. at %WW1:: e 41 1162.4464243"17$4 e 41' s 4 ii;C: dill T4 a 1‘.14.! ‘1,. Fp. s WriC.AVA-r/ Aiss3=a-: 41 ti1 • • • / •••!-, sa sc. ost,-.51: .74 1 ' •41 ' ar...isota Tot:. r...4 . $ 0 to A5 t c, iv 4.5. t fb.n. gowns ..,1•9 • 12 114.1i. £114•'r ; ; U4 Wird inewatuommitemet. c. 16104 1 17f p bar ts..,:r 19v, DUO /41 t IC • k riEte.„ Mo. TWO 4 / • • 0 Pa • $ ImPf 14•10:A044, ; f • . • _ Acz.r674 •tz).F \Vo • • • „. t9 G � NI r- t _% . d I L.__ J : w ' 1`t i1�1i t 1 4- 2'-C:'" cr.-% •■••- •1)s-%-t' . I e. F ' X `-r i ti%T 4'1 ' . >G I --T" 11.4 id7 t..i . X!' �"t" -cam L.� 1....1r77-4....-r,-‘c71....\ e1 'c: -ca - 44 I1r---c., 4 + _*"1/2 • 1=1 1.. t t.! 1 i t t"t° es7 . . ►� islet s, MA 1-1-141U -31I MI 1,1 _ oO k_ IN C 0 1 , ! c g . G ' % r ' c : � . - � � - A 1 UIS7' A!2iff -re-0 1... f. _ ri;¢; U> i';^,? i:. lal:, I%A.•''�= c�iti'L.>:s- rT';d. :.:- _. .c,{?s r..�_% ` �j PC? c7 \/e2 k g. - u T 2' °r 4 T._1•t....c n - X 2 Z \,it : C•'�i l» 1 t....1,, y . 4. r=e,L.t ce, t:IG Yze.ft. -t tP)1..1t.1. . r$'t eivt: ,.0 -41:15 ..r'a + r 'L1P' py 4, k5. tr..,-.t t...0!..C3 : 41e7C'e7 LW. : C = Tif,e7e7 c7 r 1. "�C' G.: 1' t-. 1t�I'�'� G"C IC.�t taCr'`C'" 1 z - e.e5 1--1 t R- = 7- t' -i t--•! . T PE. . Ct..l '-t'r?. , 447, csc'e, �" �✓ A 14.0ire.7e2 1 1 i111111i11111H; TlTH�IH111�111111111111111!111J 11J11111111111!11111I1! 11111111 1111111!11111111111111!11111111 i1111j 11111111 0 1(.TTIS 11J(..• I 2 i /. I _ `). ` If the microfilmed document is less clear than this . . ,. itlit ' }le. it is due to the quality of the original document. u, � Off.' E,(' lid Le 9e Se +7Z EZ 7ty` - "L2• .,17Z„ -GI £3l L. 91 S. 471 CI Zl 11 VL G E? L 9 9 +7 t: t sw U 1 i 1111!I!n1THIIIIII1111 11i i11!II!1IIH1111i1i�11�,!� H ni1111111111h1:11!i111111111i11! 1111111111111111111 11 1It! iIl !IIi�111111I1d!1111!1I11111111II! 111111111111111! 111111! 11111111111111111,1IIII !111111I1111111I1111i1111111111H111 1111! 111�li11I1111II1 !1111111II111111I1IHIIIIIilI11ii!1111 e 6 7 8 1111 �IfI111 1111111f 11. I�1�I�II!111�I�11111111111111 9 10 11 --GE-- 12 CITY Of. TUKWIL APPROVED JUN )9- %% )?v Cry( 3-0 s' ti..A JUN 9 •, > ,: �tsirat; I ►¢ \'' ' t ¶ 1.. -- C' (Slot ' -r col t747.1"-E.: : Fa 'g 5 • , r. a : , 1•`a�%L.,T 1.1 i t t. 44 0... M e, -11... "-� t..k ; "'i"� ' . t .lam i �'t-4 t QV..e2 44 52‘3.. "eft. tze °\ epe C.,0