Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L92-0002 - BAIMA AND HOLMBERG - ALPINE ESTATES REZONEl92-0002 ALPINE ESTATES SUBDIVISION REZONE ZONING CODE AMENDMENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN June 17, 1993 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Shupe Holmberg Baima Holmberg Inc. 1505 N.W. Gilman Blvd., Suite 7 Issaquah, WA 98027 Dear Mr. Holmberg, Re: Alpine Estates Subdivision (88 -1 -SUB), Rezone (L92 -0002) and Environmental Review (EPIC- 23 -89 ' J John W Racits, Mayor Rick Beeler, Director I have discussed the continued lack of progress on this application with Tom Redding of your office on June 7th. Tukwila staff have provided you with a consistent set of design standards for plan revisions over the past years, with our last detailed comments sent on March 11, 1992 (attached). The plans received in response to these comments were received on March 1, 1993 and continue to be deficient. This situation culminated in a City staff decision to meet with you'and actually participate in doing the work needed to prepare acceptable plans. Unfortunately, your staff canceled this meeting and has not rescheduled despite an acknowledgement of responsibility, an agreement to reschedule, and my reminder calls. As discussed with Mr. Redding, we have now passed the deadline to receive acceptable plans need for a public hearing before the Planning Commission in July. The following actions still need to be completed: a. meet with Tukwila staff to get feed back from the last submittal, b. work with Tukwila staff at that meeting to develop actual plans (optional), and c. submit complete plans for review. Plan submittal does not to mean that a positive recommendation is guaranteed; merely that a complete review will be possible. Tukwila staff cannot to continue reserve staff time or a Planning Commission hearing date open for this project. This would be unfair to other projects which are ready for review. Therefore, your project is being put on hold until vesting expires or the action items above are initiated. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 4313665 ... Page 2 March 11, 1992 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 Baima & Holmberg' Shupe Holmberg 1505 N.W. Gilman Blvd Suite 7 Issquah, Wa. 98027 RE: ALPINE ESTATES SUBDIVISION /REZONE /SEPA Dear Mr. Shupe: John W. Rants, Mayor This letter is to summarize our meeting of Monday, March 9, 1992. The following additional information is necessary for completion of the SEPA, Subdivision and Rezone applications: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECFLIST APPLICATION /S The current SEPA application does include the rezone request. .Therefore, you need to either revise the narrative to reflect the subdivision and rezone revuest, or submit two separate Environmental Checklists because two appeals were filed on this project. The SEPA and WAC laws asked for the combination of both applications. I have attached Public Works comments which you received at our last meeting. When all SEPA issues have been 'addressed and a SEPA determination made we will schedule your public hearing. All information regarding the SEPA application must be submitted by Monday, March 17, •1992 12:00 noon. SUBDIVISION APPLICATION A revised site plan for the subdivision was received on January 15, 1992. The following necessary information was not included and must be submitted in complete form. * Show the location of contemplated building pads and. structures. Phone: (206) 433-1800. • City Hall Fax (206) 433 -1833 REZONE APPLICATION * Show the existing trees over 6" in diameter, including their species and provide a tree retention /replacement plan. * Locate existing and proposed sewer, water lines, culverts, and other underground facilities' on the property and indicate pipe sizes and grades. Public Works Department may assist you in gathering this information. * Provide existing contours (solid) and. proposed contours (dotted) at intervals of 5 -feet or less'and referenced to United States Coast and Geodetic Survey datum. All contour lines must extend at least 100 -feet beyond the external boundaries of the property proposed for subdivision. * Provide the names, locations, widths, and other dimensions of proposed streets,'alleys, easements, parks and other open space in the vicinity reservations and utilities together with the purpose and conditions or limitations of such reservations clearly - indicated. * Clearly indicate the source of water supply, method of sewage disposal, and manner of surface run -off control. * Provide (1) one (PMT) Photomaterial Transfer of the preliminary plat reduced to 8 1/2 by 11 ". The rezone application submitted on January 15, 1992 did not, include the following information which is necessary to proce the application: * Provide an Environmental Checklist if you wish not to combine both requests into one application. If you apply separately, a fee of $225.00 will be required. .No public hearing can be scheduled until a SEPA determination has been issued. * (7) seven copies of the set of plans must be submitted with your application. The scale shall not exceed 1 " =30', with the north arrow, legend, scale and date all identified on the plans. The license stamps of the architect and landscape architect shall be on each appropriate plan. * Provide (1) PMT of each plan reduced to 8 1/2" by.l1 ". If this does not accurately reflect the understanding reached at our meeting or should you have additional questions regarding this - matter, please contact me 431 -3670. Thank You Darren ilson, Assistant Planner cc: R. Beeler, DCD Director J: McFarland, City Administrator G. Schulz, Urban Environmentalist P. Fraser, City Engineer M. Kenyon, City Attorney D. Lowrie, Property Owner ATTACHMENT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City of :Tukwila Department of Public Works Jack Pace /Darren Wilson Phil Fraser M E M O R A N D U M The request for comments, with Environments the subject development was received by Pubs was also carried out today and comments are B. Public right -of -way and ease locations for proposed street /utilities to City. Thi turnaround area at the end of the C. Topography shall address site m dwelling units` (identify e.levatio elevation for each dwelling u structures as appropriate, i.e retaining walls. . D. Identify hydrant locations March 9, 1992 Alpine Estates Subdivision - PW Co ents Checklist attached, for ic Works today. A review as follows: his development are more Fill and Grade Permit is emits, change punctuation ion presented under this Page 2, Item 9 - The permits required for appropriately listed under Item 10., Page 3. now Land Altering Permit. After Building p to semi -colon rather than colon. The ques item needs to be appropriately addressed. Page 3, Item 12 - Change South 152nd Stree to South 152nd Place and identify same on the site plan. Page 3, Item 11 - This is a general comm adequately describing this proposal. Pub following information for adequately addres the rezone request: A Existing .and proposed two (2) foo determine access grade, extent of utility location suitability, etc. nt on requirements ic Works /Fire need ing this SERA_ review contours to land altering, ent widths and turnover of includes the new street. difications for of lowest floor it) and other ., rockeries or d provide- water for the for . John W. Rants, Ma yor Ross A. Earnst, P. E., Director • 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukvnla, Washington 98 88 • Phone: (206) 433 • Fax (206) 431 - 3665 availability /analysis for pipe size if system is dead - ended. E. Show grades of proposed street and at interface with •65th Avenue South. Proposed street grade shall not exceed 15 %.• Identify locations of .curb cut /driveways along with proposed driveway grades (maximum 15%). Parking pads shall not exceed 5% in any direction. F. Provide plans and profiles for utilities including proposed and existing water, sewer and storm drainage lines and mains, 'respectively. Show service stubs for all utilities to include materials, sizes and grades. (2% minimum for sanitary side sewers.) G. Identify proposed ownership of wetlands: H. Development. was to address possibility of combined access'between Lots 1 & 2 and 9 & 10•in accordance with previous discussions. Page 4, Item 1.d - The expanded Geotechnical /Hydro logical Report does not address the extremely high moisture content (i.e., TP -6 and TP -8, with moisture contents of 64.1% and 168.7 %, respectively). P"r1 comments on 2/21/90 question whether adequate mitigations have been provided for the construction phase and final development product in accordance with the Geotechnical Engineers Report of May 16., 1989. Page 4, Item 1.e - Two foot existing and'oroposed contours need to be shown on the site plan, including building site finished contours. Any retaining structures shall be shown and all lowest floor elevations shall be provided in order to adea respond to this question. It does not appear that excavation associated with .structures' has been included in the 3,000 cubic yard total. Page 5, Item 3.a.1) - Add the two wetlands an this property which are identified as tracts A and B. Also, identify that this flow goes into I- 405 /Gilliam Creek /Green River. :Page 6, Item 3 - Proposed contours need to demonstrate that fill and . dredged material not be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands. Page- 6, Item 6 - Runoff from new street will flow through biofiltration into wetland. Page 7, item.b.1) - Because of high moisture content, this item needs to be address to accommodate construction of the .buildings and roadway. Page 7, item c.1) - This is • incorrect. A portion of. the runoff will be routed into the City system, while the other portion will flow through the biofiltration to replenish • Page 8, Item 2 - Biofiltration', oil /water separator •should• =educe or eliminate any materials from entering ground or surface waters from-- - street runoff. Page 8, d - Add: biofiltration and, oil /water. separators to reduce /eliminate pollutants. and preserve water cuality. • 'Page 11, b, 2) - Will meet City Noise Ordinance. Page 14, 12,a -.Identify Tukwila on 65th.Avenue South and also ''trail on the west side of the development. Page 14, 12,c - In past environmental. Public Works requested coordination. with Recreation Department to complete discussions for opportunities for trail connection from 65th to :trail to 62nd Avenue South. Question: Has that coordinatior•occurred ?' Page 16, b - Change to one dead -end street.. .Page 16, 15,b - Develop public•street and utilities corridor for turnover as' public to•the City as part of this subdivision: xc: Don Williams Development File: Alpine Estates Read File Attachment (1) • . PF /amc:11:alpine March 11, 1992 Dear Mr. Shupe: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 Baima & Holmberg Shupe Holmberg 1505 N.W. Gilman Blvd Suite 7 Issquah, Wa. 98027 RE: ALPINE ESTATES SUBDIVISION /REZONE /SEPA John W. Rants, Mayor This letter is to summarize our meeting of Monday, March 9, 1992. The following additional information is necessary for completion of 'the SEPA, Subdivision and Rezone applications: ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST APPLICATION /S The current SEPA application does not include the rezone request. Therefore, you need to either revise the narrative to reflect the subdivision and rezone request, or submit two separate Environmental Checklists because two appeals were filed on this project. The SEPA and WAC laws asked for the combination of both applications. I have attached Public Works comments which you received at our last meeting. When all SEPA issues have been addressed and a SEPA determination made we will schedule your public hearing. All information regarding the SEPA application must be submitted by Monday, March 17, 1992 12:00 noon. SUBDIVISION APPLICATION A revised site plan for the subdivision was received on January 15, 1992. The following necessary information was not included and must be submitted in complete form. •* Show the location of contemplated building pads and structures. Phone: (206) 433 -1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 433 -1833 REZONE 'APPLICATION * Show the existing trees over 6" in diameter, including their species and provide a tree . retention /replacement plan. * Locate existing and proposed sewer, water lines, culverts, and other underground facilities' on the property and indicate pipe sizes and grades. Public Works Department may assist you in gathering this information. * Provide existing contours (solid) and. proposed contours (dotted) at intervals cif 5 -feet or less and referenced to United States Coast and Geodetic Survey datum. All contour lines must extend at least 100 -feet beyond the external boundaries of the property proposed for subdivision. * Provide the names, locations, widths, and other dimensions of proposed streets,' alleys, easements, parks and other open space" in the vicinity reservations and utilities together with the purpose and conditions or limitations of such reservations clearly indicated. * Clearly indicate the source of water supply, method of sewage disposal, and manner of surface run -off control. * Provide (1) one (PMT) Photomaterial Transfer of the preliminary plat reduced to 8 1/2 by 11 ". The rezone application submitted on January 15, 1992 did not include the following information which is necessary to process the application: * Provide an Environmental Checklist if you wish not to combine both requests into one application. If you apply separately, a fee of $225.00.will be required. No public hearing can be scheduled until a SEPA determination has been issued. * (7) seven copies of the set of plans must be submitted with.your application. The scale shall not exceed 1 " =30', with the north arrow, legend, scale and date all. identified on the plans. The license stamps of the architect and landscape architect shall be on each appropriate plan. * Provide (1) - PMT of each plan reduced to 8 1/2" by.11 ". • If this does not accurately . reflect the un•erstanding reached at our meeting or should you have additional • estions regarding this . matter, please contact me 431-3670. Thank You Darren ATTACHMENT Assistant Planner cc: R. Beeler, DCD Director J. McFarland, City Administrator G. Schulz, Urban Environmentalist P. Fraser, City Engineer M. Kenyon, . .City Attorney D. Lowrie, Property Owner City of .Tukwila M E M O R A N D U M TO: .Jack Pace /Darren Wilson FROM: Phil Fraser DATE: March 9, 1992 SUBJECT: :Alpine Estates Subdivision - PW Comments The request for comments, with Environmental Checklist attached, 'for . the subject development was received by Public Works today. A review was also carried out today and comments are as follows: Page 2, Item 9 - The permits required for this development are more appropriately listed under Item 10, Page 3. Fill and Grade Permit is now Land Altering Permit. After Building permits, change punctuation to semi -colon rather than colon. The question presented under this item needs to be appropriately addressed. Page 3, Item 12 - Change South 152nd Street to South 152nd Place and identify same on the site plan. Page 3, Item 11 - This is a .general comment . on requirements. for adequately describing this proposal. Public Works /Fire need the following information for adequately addressing this SEPA review for the rezone. request: A.' Existing and proposed two (2) foot contours to 'determine access grade, extent of land altering, utility location suitability, etc. B. Public right -of -way and easement widths and locations ..for proposed turnover of street /utilities to City. This includes the turnaround area at the end of the new street. ' C. Topography shall address site modifications for dwelling units (identify. elevation. of lowest floor elevation for each dwelling unit) and other structures as appropriate, i.e., rockeries or retaining walls. D. Identify hydrant locations and provide- water John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Public Works Ross A. Earnst, P. E., Director • 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Turvrila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 433 - 0179 • Fa • (206) 431.366. availability /analysis for pipe size if system is dead - ended. E. Show grades of proposed street and at interface with 65th Avenue South. Proposed .street grade shall not exceed 15 %.• Identify locations of curb cut /driveways along with proposed driveway grades (maximum 15 %)'. Parking pads shall not exceed 5% in any direction. F. Provide plans and profiles for utilities including proposed and existing water, sewer and storm drainage lines and mains, respectively. Show service stubs for all utilities to include materials, sizes and grades. (2% minimum for sanitary side sewers.) G. Identify proposed ownership of wetlands: H. Development was to address possibility of combined access between Lots 1 & 2 and 9 & 10'in accordance with previous discussions. , Page 4, Item 1.d - The expanded Geotechnical /Hydrological Report does not address the extremely high moisture content (i.e., TP -6 and TP -8, with moisture contents of 64.1% and 168.7%, respectively). PW comments on 2/21/90 question whether adequate mitigations have been provided for the construction phase and final development product in accordance with the Geotechnical Engineers Report of May 16, 1989. Page 4, Item 1.e - Two foot existing and 'Proposed contours need to be shown on the site plan, including building site finished contours. Any retaining structures shall be shown and all lowest floor elevations shall be provided in order to adequately respond to this • question. It does not appear that excavation associated with .structure• has been included in the 3,000 cubic yard total. Page 5, Item 3.a.1) - Add the two wetlands on this property which are identified as tracts A and B. Also, identify that this flow goes into I- 405 /Gilliam Creek /Green River. :Page 6, Item 3 - Proposed contours need to demonstrate that fill and dredged material not be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands. Page 6, Item 6 Runoff from new street will flow through biofiltration into wetland. Page 7, Item b.1) - Because of high moisture content, this item needs to be address to accommodate construction of the .buildings and roadway. Page 7, Item c.1) This is. incorrect. A portion of . the runoff will be routed into the City system, while the other portion will flow through the biofiltration to replenish the wetlands. Page 8, Item 2 - Biofiltration', oil /water separator•should . reduce - or eliminate any materials from entering ground or surface waters from street runoff. ... Page 8, d - Add: biofiltration and oil /water, separators reduce /eliminate pollutants and preserve water quality. *Page 11, b, 2) - Will meet City Noise Ordinance. Page 14, 12,a -.Identify Tukwila•Park on 65th.Avenue South and also ''trail on the west side of the development. Page 14, 12,c - In past environmental. Public Works requested coordination with Recreation Department to complete discussions for opportunities for trail connection from 65th to.trail to 62nd Avenue South. Question: Has that coordination occurred ?• Page 16, b - Change to one dead -end street. 4 .Page 16, 15,b - Develop public-street and utilities corridor for turnover as public to City as part of this subdivision. xc: Don Williams Development File: Alpine Estates Read File Attachment (1) PF /amc:11:alpine ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST -2- Contro_.:Io. Epic File No. Fee44 -OO.00 Receipt No. 2 ,o2 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Alpine Estates Subdivision 2. Name of applicant: Lourie Contracting 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: P.O. Box 69283, Seattle WA 98168 -9283 206 - 241 -4837 4. Date checklist prepared: June 12, 1989 (Revised 12- 20 -91) 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Late Summer 1992 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 6/3/89 IES Assoc. wetlands evaluation & impacts analysis and 2/2/90 IES Assoc. wetlands mitigation plan; 11/30/89 Dept of army letter OYB -4- 013259. Wetlands report by Logan & Jones. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Fill and Grade permit - City of Tukwila: Nation wide permit (Army Corps of Engineers) Building permits: Utilities /Street use /Access permits MEMEL JAN 15 1992 Drry OF TUKWiLA PLANNING DEPT. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Metro, DOE 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete • description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. 10 lot subdivision 5.7 acres for residential home sites. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. 65th Avenue South & South 152nd Street Tukwila Washington 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes TJ BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAN Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Steep slopes b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 53% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silty sand d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. There will be 3000 cubic yards of excavation required for roadway construction. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes, however a temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan will be prepared to minimize erosion. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 25% 2. Air h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: TESC plan will be prepared a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Automobile exhaust from apartment complex and roadways. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None 3. Water a. Surface: side of the site. � Evaluation for Dust and exhaust from automobiles and tractors during construction. Exhaust from automobiles and possible wood smoke from future homes. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? . If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. A small stream runs north - south along the western Agency Use Only N/A �_. Evaluation for 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes - cuitp plan included 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water from roadway - Homes and driveways will be collected and sent into the City storm system. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 4. Plants -- Evaluation for 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No storm detention will be provided to control peak runoff rate from site. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Xx deciduous tree: •er ma• -, aspen, other — xx evergreen tree: cedar, pine, other xx shrubs grass — pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other — other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The site will be cleared for home construction The wetland area will be enhanced per Logan & Jones mitigation plan. Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Lawns and flower beds will be planted around home sites. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle' songbirds other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and natural gas are available to the site. Individual home owners could use solar or wood heat. energy codes 7. Environmental Health (.. � Evaluation for b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Homes will be constructed to conform current a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: N/A Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic from busy roadways and apartments. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise from construction during daylight hours and from homes during all hours. Construction equipment will meet Federal and State noise level standards. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Site is undeveloe . Adjacent sites are apartment complexes and residential homes. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No c. Describe any structures on the site. None Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No g. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? R - 1 - 12.0 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the Site? Low density w /special density consideration If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes, the west side of the site has been designated as wetlands i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 10 Homesites --' j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Nave 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Project conforms to existing and ' omprehensive plan zoning. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? 10 Middle income homesites b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 35' b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The site will be landscaped after construction. („._.- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Glare from windows of homes during daylight hours. Light trom homes during evening hours. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Light and glare from adjacent apt and homes. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Fort Dentpark and Green River are 1/4 mile east b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None (-- for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Access road will connect to 65th Avenue South b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. one Trock c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Add 15 places. None Evaluation for Agency Use Only Will the proposal require any new roads or or improvements to existing roads or stre including driveways? If so, generally (indicate whether public or private). streets, -ts, not describe One street running through project - ite to se Will the project use (or occur in the mmediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transporta ion? If so, generally describe. No How many vehicular trips per day would be •enerated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 100 trips. Peak volumes will ■uring normal peak traffic times. Proposed measures to reduce or control tation impacts, if any: ranspor- None l is Services Would the project result in an increased public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? so, generally describe. need for If Yes. All public services will be increased to serve 10 more homesites. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on public services, if any. direct None -16- d. e . f. g 15. Pub a. b. Evaluation for Agency Use Only rve homes ,• 16. Utilities a. C ilities currently a .'sable --a e: natural ga' water refuse service ary sew- , septic sys b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water, sewer, storm, electric, gas, cable TV, and phone services will be extended to serve the property. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 0 BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAN\ Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Additional storm runoff would occur due to additional impervious area. An increase in emissions could occur if woodstoves are used. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Storm detention will be provided to control storm runoff. Woodstoves would be constructed to meet current emission standards. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Small animals on site would leave. Exisiting_ trees would be cleared. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: For home construction. Both wetland areas will remain. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? 10 new homes would use energy for heat and light. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: Homes would be constructed to meet current energy code requirements. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Permit has been obtained from the Army Corps of Engineers (OYB -4- 013259) To fill small wetland, however, this will not be done. On site wetlands will remian. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? N/A Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: N/A How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? N/A 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? 10 new homes would put increase in demand for all public services and utilities. (,.: ' - Evaluation for Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. N/A Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Evaluation for Agency Use Only 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No 'i`O BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANI,.. E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To provide 10 new homes for middle to upper middle income families. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? New homes will be constructed in a differnt locale. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: This site is preferred. All utilities and public services are available and the site is near two freeways. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ME[011 1 JAN 15 1992 CITY OF TUKWILA LANNINC DEPT. OWNER REZONE PPLICATION 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 Subdivision of 5.7 acres into 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: 10 residential building lots. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) Approximately 65th Ave S. and S 153rd St. Lot 19 Interurban Addition Quarter: Section: 23 Township: 23 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement) 3. APPLICANT:* Name: Baima & Holmberg, Inc Address 1Sn9 NW Gilman P,lvri #I7. Issaquah WA 98097 Phone. -(206) 392 -0250 Signature: x Date: * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY Name: Alton White & Lois Canfield Add ress: 4111 55th SW, Seattle WA 98116 p.0 Box 69283 Phone: ( 938 -1158 (t CCoci'( - rr cr Purchaser Lourie Contracting Seattle WA 98168 (206) 241 -4837 I /WE,[signature(s)] swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract purcha ) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: / /5— REZONE APPLICATION �• Page 2 5. What is the current zoning of the property? R -1 -12.0 6. What is the size of the property? 5.7 Acres 7. What zoning classification is requested? R -1 -7.2 8. What is the comprehensive land use map designation? Low density residential RE SPONS E: See attached CRITERIA The burden of proof in demonstrating that the change is appropriate lies solely upon the proponent. Generally, the more dramatic the change, the greater will be the burden of showing that the proposed change is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan as implemented by the Zoning Ordinance. The proponent must show in a clear and precise manner why the rezoning application should be granted. The Planning Commission and City Council will review your proposal using the following criteria. You may attach additional sheets and submit other documentation to support your rezone application. 1. The use or change in zoning requested shall be in conformity with the adopted compre- hensive land use policy plan, the provisions of this title, and the public interest. 2. The use or change in zoning requested in the zoning map or this title for the establishment of commercial, industrial, or residential use shall be supported by an architectural site plan showing the proposed development and its relationship to surrounding areas as set forth in the application form. RESPONSE: See attached 3. When the request is not in agreement with the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, the applicant shall provide evidence to the City Council's satisfaction that there is an additional need for the requested land classification. (go to next page) laanga JAN 15 1992 LI r ti •..11 I k... t t c:.i.4 ru,n,.... .. REZONE APPLICATION �• Page 2 5. What is the current zoning of the property? R -1 -12.0 6. What is the size of the property? 5.7 Acres 7. What zoning classification is requested? R -1 -7.2 8. What is the comprehensive land use map designation? Low density residential RE SPONS E: See attached CRITERIA The burden of proof in demonstrating that the change is appropriate lies solely upon the proponent. Generally, the more dramatic the change, the greater will be the burden of showing that the proposed change is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan as implemented by the Zoning Ordinance. The proponent must show in a clear and precise manner why the rezoning application should be granted. The Planning Commission and City Council will review your proposal using the following criteria. You may attach additional sheets and submit other documentation to support your rezone application. 1. The use or change in zoning requested shall be in conformity with the adopted compre- hensive land use policy plan, the provisions of this title, and the public interest. 2. The use or change in zoning requested in the zoning map or this title for the establishment of commercial, industrial, or residential use shall be supported by an architectural site plan showing the proposed development and its relationship to surrounding areas as set forth in the application form. RESPONSE: See attached 3. When the request is not in agreement with the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, the applicant shall provide evidence to the City Council's satisfaction that there is an additional need for the requested land classification. (go to next page) IPC(113E6E7 JAN 15 1992 I_ (ITV QF TL1KWILA PLANNING DEPT. REZONE APPLICATION RESPONSE. N/A 4. Significant changes have occurred in the character, conditions or surrounding neighbor- hood that justify or otherwise substantiate the proposed rezone. RESPONSE: No significant changes have taken place in this area. 5. The proposed rezone is in the best interest of public health and safety as compared to the hardship, such as diminution of property value, imposed on the individual property owner. RESPONSE: N/A 6. The unimproved subject property is unsuitable for the purpose for which it has been zoned considered in the context of the length of time the property has remained unim- proved and land development in the surrounding area. RESPONSE: See attached Page 3 aelidiiiiiiiimih, CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS, LABEL REQUIREMENTS 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 Notification of persons of certain types of pending applications is required in order to encourage citizen participation in the land use process. Applicants are required to submit a mailing matrix and one photocopied set of labels which show: 1. The name and address of all owners of property lying within 300 feet of the boundaries of the property for which a permit is sought; and 2. The address of all residents of property within 300 feet of the boundaries of property. Property owner names and addresses can be obtained from the King County Department of Assessments located on the 7th floor of the King County Administration Building, Room 700, 500 Fourth Avenue, Seattle. To compile the information: 1. Obtain the assessor's map(s), which contains your property and all abutting property within 300 feet. (See diagram.) You may use the maps on file in the Assessor's Office or they can be purchased from the King County Department of Public Works Map Counter on the 9th floor of the Administration Building. It is suggested that assessor's maps be ordered several hours in advance of the time you would like to pick them up. 71 — [JAN 151992 L. C1TY OF- 1 t. KWI L/, PLANNING DEPT. 2. Then, obtain a computer batch order form from the Department of Assessments, list on the batch order form the property tax account numbers shown on the assessor's map(s) and submit the batch order form to the Department of Assessments together with the required fee for a printout of the information. Assistance with the tax account numbers may be obtained through the Assessor's Office or the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development (DCD). King County labels are not acceptable because they cannot be duplicated. Resident names and addresses are researched by the applicant. Kroll maps located in the DCD have buildings and street names and addresses. The information on the mailing matrix may refer to "Resident" or "Tenant ", with the proper mailing address, if the specific name is unknown. 12i14/nn 1. RESPONSE: 2. RESPONSE: 6. RESPONSE: re) [Erg N I � .��� * |�u� aiii[}FTu |LA PLANNING DEPT. We propose to change the existing zoning for this site from an R-1-12.0, which is Low Density Residential (Single Family), to one of R-1-7'2' This rezoninq will not change the existing density requirements for this area, but will inable us to reduce the minimum lot size requirements from 12,000 square feet down to a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. This reduction would allow us to develop eighteen (18) individual lots, but due to the slope of the site and the wetlands involved, we are proposing a ten (10) lot subdivision. This will reduce the number of lots that might generally be involved by a rezoninq to an R-1-7'2 and will inable us to maintain the exoiting sensitive area on this site. Our proposed development for this site shall meet the preformance standards that are required by the R-I zoning ordinance. We are proposing a ten (10) lot subdivision for this site, with the smallest lot size being slightly over 7,200 square feet and the largest lot size approximately 20,000 square feet' Improvements proposed for this site, such as construction of a new street and installation of the necessary utilities will be designed by a state licensed engineer or engineering firm, and the building structures shall be designed by a state licensed architect. The proposed development will be compatible with, and/or similar to, the surrounding area, and will meet all traffic and pedestrian circulation requirements. As it stands, the site conditions and the wetlands that exist on this site, the R-1-12'0 zoning does not promote site developement. To subdivide and develop this site under the current zoning would prove to be too costly and the price per lot would be too high. Hence, in all likelyhood, the property would remain unimproved unless rezoning is approved. Burien Escrow 116 Southwest 153rd Street Seattle, Washington 98166 Attention: Gail Customer Ref.: 18716 1. CHRIS RIELAND, Senior Title Officer KELLY CORNWALL, Assistant Title Office TERESA HOLLENBECK, Title Technician Unit No. 6 343 -1335 Policy or Policies to be issued: ALTA Owner's Policy Standard (X) Extended ( ) Proposed Insured: STEWART TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 1300 Seattle, Washington 98104 SECOND REPORT A. L. T. A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Effective Date: January 7, 1992, at 8:00 a.m. Amount Tax DANIEL H. LOURIE and /or LOURIE CONTRACTING INC., corporation 2. The estate or interest in the land described covered by this commitment is fee simple. Title Order No.: 83916 an Alaskan' ALTON S. WHITE, JR. and LOIS G. CANFIELD, each as to their respective separate estates 4. The land referred to in this commitment is situated in the King, state of Washington, and described as follows: JAN 15 1992 CITY OF TU1fW1LA PLANNING DEPT. PREMIUM $190,000.00 $680.00 $ 55.08 herein and which is 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Commitment vested in: county of Lot 19, Interurban Addition to City of Seattle, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion of said lot condemned for roadway purposes in King County Superior Court Case No. 737410. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT Schedule B Order No. 83916 I. The following are the requirements to be complied with: A. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. B. Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. II. Schedule B of the Policy or Policies to be issued (as set forth in Schedule A) will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Public or private easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public record. 3. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records, or Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. 5. Any title or rights asserted by anyone including but not limited to persons, corporations, governments or other entities, to tide lands, or lands comprising the shores or bottoms of navigable rivers, lakes, bays, ocean or sound, or lands beyond the line of the harbor lines as established or changed by the United States Government. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water. 7. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance, capacity, or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. 8. General taxes not now payable or matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding the same becoming a lien. 9. Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes. C. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: As on Schedule B, attached. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 1. AGREEMENT AND THE BY AND BETWEEN: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: REGARDING: 2. Payment of Real Estate The property described local taxing authority 3. GENERAL NOTE: YEAR: AMOUNT: TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: LEVY CODE: TERMS AND CURRENT ASSESSED VALUE: A.L.T.A. COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Page 2 CONDITIONS THEREOF: City of Tukwila, Washington, a Municipal Corporation and Puget Sound Poer & Light Company, a Washington Corporation April 9, 1971 May 10, 1971 7105100421 Electric distribution system Excise Tax, if required. Present Rate of Real Estate Excise Tax 1.59 %. herein is situated within the boundaries of of unincorporated King County. TAXES: PAYABLE ON FEBRUARY 15TH: as of the date herein is 1992 NOT YET AVAILABLE 359700 - 0360 -07 2380 Land: $191,000.00 Improvements: None Please be aware that should this transaction cancel, there be a minimum cancellation fee of $50.00 plus tax of $4.10. END OF SCHEDULE B Title to this property was examined by: Teresa Hollenbeck Any inquiries should be directed to one of the title in Schedule A. CC: Loudon Real Estate - Attn: Robin Loudon TH /gh/46241 Order No. 83916 officers i !T9: CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. will set forth 6 m TRACT Y "Ml 3 7a +1 6M MM TRACT * %V 1113I1TY YAP 1111 2 7.110q a1. 1111 w NM OM NM NM M I Ml• — o - -- aM MM M= !MR AO M= M AIM 011111 M>• MMaI AIM III= Ml• MOM M• MM MI/ MM —MM M N J r Ml• BMW M1 MM MM — MME MM IM NMI! s— NM Mt Mai . — M M— Ml•! —MM M =NM MI AM MI= MINN MO OM MI MMI MGM — MM — EMI — — NNW IMM JMM .•a a a a AB a a a a AN . a a a 'Amt. F6TATE8 ,: SOMME= 001•A LOBO m0a"000 103. 1111-4177 IBM l =ID pt MAIM MONO Wilt WWII% 1161-407 WS S. UM fa lEAT1UG M MN LRRYiM 1Q1 Ns OWN NM NM 7. •I►.01L M t01R7 101/1. R /MB WO AWN 1I111.ftWWIOM 104. WI Ai SW ZOOM al -ItaO .. ' 1110PCBM IIM M[ /A•T OQAOM ' .. WNW SWIM QIY W 1111•• WM o1T s 111 t O 1 1• ta • AM1 p 1 MOM 111.1 :MM 11:ta n NI •° • 7M , • =WM. e WNW. W M. 101808 1• NW NM N. MUM ILL WRIT .7 ..MO. YL Oft 00181 P1W IU•11OW • I= AIL LOY nib . 11.000 COMM fat MAO ■ Ma1W MNE LIMILICSIMEM 1•1111111111 AMON 10 KAM PM M W I 1B. I/i M. MOM Of BM 1711 DADA M IIMr l W ill A T MMiIOI 0/ MD AK 1111/A1011.6 /•M tt L MIL 811 O/ ••• p ltIMWT 10Y1 1i0itl IM.. ML N 1MOMPire110 i-.D a1 11!11• N Baima & Holmberg Inc. ,,.1,,,,11 • .•...T•,l 111111111•11111•4 •111 a1t00.•OtO — WOW- •W MIND WI IMAM M IMF If 300)3 . 02. 07•110 MEWED IT Balma & Holmberg Inc. LNGINICENS IUNVITORS ma 0111 000•01 KM, P(MI1 11001ul 101.•100100 SO (10001 - LOURIE CONTRACTING INC. ALPINE ESTATES MEET =NMI PRELIMINARY PLAT La z • on, 1,A2 Oorf2 • S. 151ST ST. ' liL I I- 1 \ .• ..., 6 !• \ 2 MilliMi nlikrabbnet '141 .-:. .. . \ • . 4 , , ':: I i • •••,, '''.2.. ;...f, 1 I "-,±. •-■..! 1 ::: :. - . 0 . . • V ‘: t 1/' \ V ! ' ' ' iti : ... ' I I I !: \ I \: ' • ' • • .-' . . °. 11 : ' . .12. N, •' . I ,1.1: I 13 ! :..' - - I 10 1 ' I \' 1\ ) • 2+ , 2 l i L.... 7,0mA n. i +. •4,,,0 AI n. 1:,000 .0 11 1 I\ : -' -1 1 :. 400 : 00 • b,;. -- J 1, •-•.-i;i,• •••• 1 _ ..i ...... • • :,, _ , i 101 it 01:100•014 kills. 101W:A 01 04 .00■••■••• 10 CA 04.2. .640, 0...0101 cc :TUKWILA r • VICINI Ty_ MAE I • GRAPHIC: SCALE APR 499J SNIT 1 TRACT 'A' WETLAND 70TH. LIE 5K•. 9.76 00211 TOTAL JOB Balms & Holmb.r *Inc. ALPINE "ESTATES SITE PLAN/REZONING . JOKING ARFA MAP 1 cu. / j n /* t• l7n LOURIE CONTRACTING INC. DATUM LL OESCRIPRON Balms & Holmberg Inc. S 153RD ST. SCALE STATIST1CS LOURIE CONTRACTING INC. PROM PREUIAINARY PLAT ALPINE ESTATES .