Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L92-0017 - MCHUGH EDWARD - HOMEWOOD SUITES SIGN VARIANCEl92-0017 6925 southcenter boulevard cancelled homewood suites sign City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 John W. Rants, Mayor STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Prepared March 26, 1992 HEARING DATE: April 2, 1992 P11 F, NUMBER: L92 -0017: Homewood Suites APPLICANT: Edward McHugh Architect; Homewood Suites REQUEST: A variance from the Sign Code Section 19.32.180 Freeway Interchange Businesses to increase the freestanding sign from 50 square feet to 100 square feet per side and the height from 35 feet to 43.9 feet. LOCATION: 6925 Southcenter Blvd. ACREAGE: 3.12 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial ZONING DISTRICT: C -2 Regional Retail STAFF: Darren Wilson ATTACHMENTS: A. Vicinity Map B. Site Plan Map C. Freestanding Sign Elevation D. Site Views #1 thru 4 E. Sign Face Elevation (Color Renderings Will Be Submitted At The Public Hearing) F. BAR Submittal Phone: (206) 433 -1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 433 -1833 VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION FINDINGS Staff Report to the L92 -0017: Homewood Suites Board of Adjustment Page 2 Proposal: The applicant is requesting to install a freestanding sign 43'75" in height and 100 square feet of signage per side for a total 200 square feet. This is a variance from the existing maximum 30 feet height limit 50 square feet of signage per side with a total 100 square feet. 'Existing Development: The site is under construction for a 106 room hotel as shown in Attachment B. Surrounding Land Use: Adjacent to the site is a State Farm Office Building and Fort Dent One & Two Office Buildings. (Refer to Attachment A). Terrain: The site is flat. Access: The only entry to the property is an extension of Southcenter Boulevard which is shared with adjacent property development. (See Attachment A) BACKGROUND This project has received Board of Architectural Review approval on February 22, 1990 for a hotel design (Homewood Suites). The applicant's proposed signage only included a ground mounted sign at the project entry. (Refer to Attachment F) This was approved by the BAR. If the variance is approved, than the sign would be reviewed by the BAR. A cooperative parking agreement reduced required parking stalls by 8.4 % from approximately 129 spaces to 119 was approved by the Planning Commission. As a condition to the cooperative parking agreement, the applicant agreed to restrict signage advertising meeting areas to inside the hotel. The approved sign and condition to approval indicate that project signage would be low key. Staff suggested that the applicant pursue the option of an area sign with the State Farm, Fort Dent I & Fort Dent II buildings, to be located at the Southcenter Boulevard and Interurban Avenue intersection per TMC 19.08.200. Staff Report to the L92 -0017: Homewood Suites Board of Adjustment Page 3 The applicant previously requested a similar variance from the Sign Code Section 19.32.180 Freeway Interchange Business (Permitted Signs -- Height and Area Allowance) in December 1991. The previous request was for 237.57 square feet per side of sign area instead of the current application for 100 square feet per side sign area. The requested 43.75 sign height is the same in both applications. The following table summarizes what the applicant has requested, what is permitted outright under the sign code, and what is permitted with Planning Commission approval. Applicant's Signage Signage Permitted With Request Permitted Planning Commission Review Sign Area 100 Sq. Ft. 50 Sq. Ft. 62.5 Sq. Ft. Sign Height 43.75 Ft. 35 Ft. 43.75 Ft. DECISION CRITERIA The Board of Adjustment decisions are based on the criteria listed below. The Board must determine that all seven criteria have been satisfied in order to approve the variance request. The applicant bears full responsibility for demonstrating that the variance request meets all seven criteria. A. The variance as approved shall not constitute a grant of special privilege which is inconsistent with the intent of this sign code, nor which contravenes the limitation on use of property specified by the zoning classification in which this property is located. Applicant's Response: "Granting of the requested variance will not result in a special privilege for this applicant since the applicant is merely seeking rights which are comparable to others in the vicinity, particularly other hotels. Visibility and easy identity are important for any hotel and adequate signage is required in order to achieve this goal. The height and area proposed for the Homewood Suites freestanding sign are necessary to achieve a reasonable amount of visibility in order to assist guests, visitors, and vendors in identifying the location in the most direct way possible. This is consistent with the stated purpose of the Sign Code, referenced in Section 19.04.020, which is to allow for visual communication which will enhance safety, while at the same time minimizing potential street clutter and distraction." Staff Report To The L92 -0017: Homewood Suites Board of Adjustment Page 4 Staff's Response: The applicant's property is within a 1000 feet of a freeway interchange. The height and area restrictions for freestanding signs as prescribed in Section 19.32.140 (C) may be increased twenty -five percent for freeway interchange businesses as defined in Section 19.08.080 upon approval of the Planning Commission. This allows for a potential sign area of 62.5 square feet and 43.75 foot sign height (See Background). All businesses want vendors and visitors to see their sign from the public right -of -way. This is not unusual. However, other businesses have been able to achieve this within existing Sign Code standards. This includes the hundreds of businesses located in the interior areas of business parks, as well as the adjacent State Farm and Fort Dent I & II buildings which are set back from Interurban Avenue and 'have similar road visibility. These adjacent businesses are advertized with less signage than allowed by code and less than Homewood Suites is currently allowed under existing regulations. B. That the variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property to provide it with use rights and privileges perntitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is located Applicant's Response: "The subject property has a very unique location, as well as unusual shape and configuration. The site has no street frontage and is separated from the nearest streets, Southcenter Boulevard and Interurban Avenue by distances of approximately 320 feet and 800 feet, respectively. It is situated approximately 1000 feet from I -405 and has office buildings and other structures in the intervening area, thereby reducing the visibility of the subject property from both the nearest public streets and the interstate freeway. The subject property is located at the far southeastern corner of a peninsula of land that is, for the most part, surrounded by the Green River. Its unique characteristics distinguish the subject property from most any other property in the general vicinity, particularly those properties which are developed with hotel uses. Consequently, in order to attain the same rights of other hotel users and property owners in the area, the requested sign code variance is necessary to afford the applicant comparable rights of visibility and identity." Staff Report to the L92 -0017: Homewood Suites Board of Adjustment Page 5 Staff's Response: The flag lot or pipe stem shape is not unusual, with many commercially zoned lots in the CBD having similar shapes. The surrounding office buildings, especially Fort Dent II to the immediate north, have similar locational and of visibility characteristics. They are using less signage than is permitted to them and less than permitted to Homewood Suites by code. C. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is located. Applicant's Response: "The requested variance will not result in any adverse impact for any surrounding property owner or user. The subject sign will be substantially separated by distance and intervening development from the nearest public street frontage. Consequently, there will be no resulting sign street clutter along street frontage nor will this result in a distraction for motorists. To the contrary, the proposed sign would enhance public safety and minimize distractions by providing a clear communication to guests or vendors traveling to the hotel site of its location and assist them in finding the most efficient way of traveling to the site. This will reduce the amount of circuitous trips by motorists who might otherwise be lost and having difficulty in finding the site. As a result of the unique location and configuration of the site, the freestanding sign will not impair the view or otherwise be an obstruction for any nearby owner." Staff's Response: The size of the sign would be 100 square feet per side with a height of 43.75 feet. The freestanding sign location will be approximately 70 feet from the City /County- wide recreational trail. The sign has a greater prominence and scale than adjacent ground mounted and building signs, and rises 10+ feet over the State Farm building and both Fort Dent buildings. This may result in visual impacts to the occupants of the hotel, surrounding office buildings, and to the trail and park users. Views to the south of Mt. Rainier will be impaired by the placement of the proposed sign. Staff Report to the L92 -0017: Homewood Suites Board of Adjustment Page 6 D. That the special conditions and circumstances prompting the variance request do not result from the actions of the applicant. Applicant's Response: "The special circumstances pertaining to the subject property are natural conditions relating to the location of the site and its configuration. Its substantial distance and separation from the nearest public street is a condition that has not been created by the applicant. The applicant is striving to overcome this situation by providing an adequate sign to meet the needs of its customers, visitors and vendors. To do otherwise would be, a disservice to its patrons and invitee." Staff's Response: The applicant chose to purchase the lot and locate a hotel off of the principle arterial on a lot without street frontage. E. That the variance as granted represents the least amount of deviation from prescribed regulations necessary to accomplish the purpose for which the variance is sought and which is consistent with the stated intent of this code. Applicant's Response: "If the proposed sign were to be further reduced to any significant extent, it would not be effective in identifying the location of the property for hotel guests, visitors and vendors. While a large sign with greater height would be preferred by the applicant, the sign has been reduced to the minimum necessary to achieve its communication goals. The applicant has sought to minimize the area and height of the sign in order to comply with sign code regulations." Staff's Response: The variance request is for a sign 100 percent larger and twenty -five percent taller than normally allowed (See Background for effects of Planning Commission approval). The intent of the sign code is not for the freestanding sign to be completely visible from I -405. Even if the variance was approved visibility from I -405 or Southcenter Boulevard would still be questionable with any future developments. Also see response to Criteria AandB. Staffs Response: Applicant's Response: Staff's Response: Staff Report to the L92 -0017: Homewood Suites Board of Adjustment Page 7 F. That granting of the variance shall result in greater convenience to the public in identifying the business location for which a sign code variance is sought. Applicant's Response: "The proposed sign will facilitate hotel guests and the general public in identifying the location of the Homewood Suites Hotel and will permit them to arrive at the site in the most convenient way possible. A strict application of the sign code regulations in this instance would be contrary to the public convenience and interest in that the resulting sign would be not be reasonably visible and would not result in effective communication of the location of the subject property." The proposed size of 100 square feet per side and a height of 43.75 feet sign would allow more visibility of the hotel's presence. G. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a public nuisance or adversely affect public safety. "The subject property is substantially separate from the nearest public right -of- way. Therefore, the size of the sign will not in any way impair traffic circulation. To the contrary, by providing reasonable identity and effectively communicating the location of the site, it will enhance traffic circulation by reducing circulations driving. Additionally, the proposed freestanding sign will not obscure the views of the general public nor any individual property owner. Furthermore, the sign will not result in any clutter or distraction, or otherwise impact the environment in any significant manner. The proposed sign will rather provide positive and beneficial impacts for the aforementioned reasons." The overall sign design is neat and orderly based on a preliminary review of the proposed sign. The sign would not produce an unsafe distraction. The sign's structure will be required to receive building permit approval as part of the permit process to ensure safe construction. Staff Report to the L92 -0017: Homewood Suites Board of Adjustment Page 8 CONCLUSIONS A. The variance as approved shall not constitute a grant of special privilege which is inconsistent with the intent of this sign code, nor which contravenes the limitation on use of property specified by the zoning classification in which this property is located. The requested doubling of sign area from 50 square feet to 100 square feet (See Proposal and Background) does not seem to be consistent with the intent of the code and is a grant of special privileged in light of: a. The common occurrence of pipe stem lots in the commercially zoned CBD when the Sign Code was adopted indicates that this was not an unanticipated situation, b. The similar visibility characteristics of adjacent developments which use less signage than is allowed to Homewood Suites under existing regulations (See Criteria A & B Findings), and c. The Sign Code allows shared signage for this type of situation in TMC 19.08.200 Based on this, staff concludes that the proposal does not meet Criteria A. B. That the variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location or surroundings of the subject property to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is located Pipe stem lots are not unusual nor is the occurrence of businesses with minimal street frontage (See Criteria B Findings). The applicant's discussion of project visibility is inconsistent with staff's findings that Homewood Suites structures are at least as visible as the adjacent office buildings. In fact the Suite's contrasting architecture makes the project more visible than surrounding projects. Based on this, staff concludes that the proposal does not meet Criteria B Staff Report To The Board of Adjustment Page 9 L92 -0017: Homewood Suites C. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is located The proposed sign identifies the project site for the public and vendors as do all other signs for their respective businesses. Planning staff would not consider the proposed sign to be a "public service message ". The 100 foot sign may be detrimental to surrounding properties to the extent that it rises above the State Farm building by 10+ feet, may change the low key visual character of area signage, and detracts from a focus on area architecture. Based on this, staff concludes that the proposal does not meet Criteria C. D. That the special conditions and circumstances prompting the variance request do not result from the actions of the applicant.• There are no special circumstances since the applicant chose to locate a hotel off of the principle arterial on a lot without street frontage. Based on this, staff concludes that the proposal does not meet Criteria D. E. That the variance as granted represents the least amount of deviation from prescribed regulations necessary to accomplish the purpose for which the variance is sought and which is consistent with the stated intent of this code. The findings and conclusions in criteria A -C indicate that the existing allowed area is sufficient to locate the project and that its architecture makes the development visually prominent. Based on this, staff concludes that the proposal does not meet Criteria E. F. Variance shall result in greater convenience to the public. The sign will increase public visibility. Based on this, staff concludes that the proposal does meet Criteria F. G. Variance will not constitute a public nuisance or adversely affect public safety. The proposed sign would not produce an unsafe distraction. Based on this, staff concludes that the proposal does meet Criteria G. . RECOMMENDATION L92 -0017: Homewood Suites Page 10 Based on the information provided by the applicant, staff has concluded that the applicant's sign variance request does not meet Criteria A -E. Since all seven of the variance criteria have not been met, the Planning Staff recommends that the variance request be denied. Staff reiterates their previous recommendation to Homewood Suites that it work with State Farm and Fort Dent I & II owners to erect a joint shared directional freestanding sign at the Southcenter Boulevard intersection per TMC 19.08.200. Such a freestanding sign at the intersection of Southcenter Boulevard would effectively locate all projects on the Fort Dent peninsula in a manner consistent with the area architecture. City of Tukwila Mr. Nesheim opened the public hearing at 7 :11 p.m. 91 -08-V: HOMEWOOD SUITES HOTEL BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES JANUARY 2, 1992 John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director Mr. Nesheim called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. Board members present were Messrs. Nesheim, Lockhart, Goe, and Mrs. Regel. MR. GOE MOVED TO EXCUSE ANN ALTMAYER; MR. LOCKHART SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. LOCKHART MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JULY 18, 1991; MRS. REGEL SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. With regard to the election of officers, Moira Bradshaw reminded the Board members that Mrs. Regel's and Mr. Lockhart's terms had expired. MR. GOE MOVED THAT THE ELECTION OF OFFICERS BE POSTPONED UNTIL AFTER THE REVIEW OF APPLICATION 91 -08-V: HOMEWOOD SUITES HOTEL; MR. LOCKHART SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Darren Wilson presented the staff report and indicated that the appellant was .requesting to increase the size of their freestanding sign from 50 sq. ft. to 237.57 sq. ft. He then submitted attachments "F" and "Fl" which are color renderings of the site with the subject sign with and without the variance. He indicated that the site is bordered by the Green River on two sides. The Board of Architectural Review provided approval of the hotel design in February of 1990 but the signage was not included. The Sign Code currently permits a freestanding sign of 50 sq. ft. and 35 feet in height. The calculation for the square footage of the sign is based upon the linear street frontage of the subject property. The height of the sign is not being reviewed because the Sign Code states that the Planning Commission can approve up to 25% of the height of the sign and the applicant is within those parameters. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 Board of Adjustment Minutes Page 2 With regard to Criteria "A ", staff stated that the proposed sign does not meet the intent of the Sign Code since the Code allows a sign of 50 sq. ft. and the applicant is proposing a sign of 237.57 sq. ft. Also, no other sign variances have been granted in this area. Therefore, staff concludes that the proposal does not meet Criteria "A ". With regard to Criteria "B ", staff stated that there were no special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location and surroundings since all businesses within the area are faced with restricted visibility. Therefore staff concludes that the proposal does not meet Criteria "B ". With regard to Criteria "C ", staff stated that there will be visual impacts to the occupants of the hotel, the surrounding office buildings, and the users of the City /County -wide recreational trail due to the location and size of the proposed free - standing sign. Therefore, staff concludes that the proposal does not meet criteria "C ". With regard to Criteria "D ", staff stated that the applicant chose to locate a hotel off of the principle arterial on a lot without street frontage, therefore the special circumstances prompting the variance are the result of the applicant's actions. Therefore, staff concludes that the proposal does not meet criteria 'D". With regard to Criteria "E ", staff stated that the there will be a visibility problem from 1-405 even if the variance were granted. Therefore, staff concludes that the proposal does not meet criteria "E ". With regard to Criteria "F ", staff stated that increasing the size of the sign may improve the visibility to the public but, it will still be difficult for the traveling public to access the site once off the freeway. Therefore, staff concludes that the proposal does not meet criteria With regard to Criteria "G ", staff stated that the proposed sign would not adversely affect the public safety or create a public nuisance, however, until the applicant can demonstrate that all precautions have been taken for the location and size of the sign, the staff concludes that the proposal does not meet criteria "G ". Based upon the information provided by the applicant, the staff concludes that the applicant's sign variance does not meet all seven criteria, therefore, staff recommends denial of the variance. Mr. Goe asked if 1-405 has signage indicating hotel /motel availability at the exits. Staff indicated the State will not allow Homewood Suites to put up a sign off of I -405 because in order to do that a motorist would have to make more than one turn off of the freeway to reach the hotel. Board of Adjustment Page 3 Minutes Mr. Goe asked if the zoning classification in which Homewood Suites is located is contiguous to any other zoning classification in which other hotels are located. Staff stated that the zonings are not contiguous. Mr. Goe asked if there was a specific definition by Zoning regulation or RCW which identifies a radius length defining "vicinity" from a specific site. Staff indicated that when sending a public notice to surrounding areas, a radius of 300 feet is used. Mr. Goe asked if there were any other hotels within 300 feet of the boundaries of the zoned property on which Homewood Suites is located. Staff indicated that there were no hotels within 300 feet of Homewood Suites. Mr. Goe asked if there was a specific definition for the term "area" which is used in the staff report. Staff stated that "area" and "vicinity" would have the same meaning. Mr. Lockhart asked how much street frontage Homewood Suites had. Staff indicated that they had less than 200 lineal feet and under the Sign Code, with lineal square footage between 0 and 200 feet a free - standing sign can only be 50 sq. ft. per side. Mr. Goe asked the size of a free -way interchange area. Staff stated that a freeway interchange area is an area with a radius of 1000 feet from a freeway on /off ramp and, intersection with a city arterial in a commercial /industrial zone, but not separated by physical barriers from the entry/eadt intersection. Mr. Goe asked what types of barriers might be involved. Staff stated topographic barriers such as rivers or if the site couldn't be reached without going beyond the 1,000 feet. Mr. Goe asked what portion of the property was located within the 1,000 foot radius. Staff indicated only a fraction of the site was located within the 1,000 feet. Ed McHugh, Architect, 2661 Bel -Red Road, Suite 202, Bellevue, WA: Board of Adjustment Page 4 Minutes Mr. McHugh started out by clarifying where the subject property was located. He went on to say that the other hotels in the area have better signage either because of zoning or because they put signs on the buildings as well as having free - standing signs. He stated that because of their sloped roofs and residential concept, the building does not lend itself well to wall signs. The site is located on an easement road and therefore, there is no street frontage for calculating the sign area. He said that even with the proposed sign, the lettering will only be between 18 and 24 inches high and has to be viewed from 800 feet. Mr. McHugh stated that they didn't intend for the sign to be viewed from the freeway, but they would like the sign to be visible from Interurban Ave. With regard to freeway signs, Mr. McHugh indicated that he had been in contact with the State after staff's conversation with them. The State indicated that they would review Mr. McHugh's proposal for a freeway sign after the hotel is open for business. Mr. McHugh stated that the proposed sign would be the only means to draw people to the site once they are off the free -way. In addressing the comments in the staff report, Mr. McHugh felt that the proposal was in conformance with the intent of the Sign Code, and that the sign does not pose a safety hazard. He went on to note that although staff indicates that no other variances have been granted in the area, that should not be a reason to deny this variance request. He did not agree with staff's opinion that the sign would obstruct the views of Mt. Rainier. He stated that the intent was not for the sign to be seen from I -405, but to be seen when exiting the freeway, and that they hoped to obtain permission from the State to obtain freeway signage. Mr. McHugh said that there were special circumstances relating to the location and surroundings of the subject property. For example, the property is located on a peninsula, at the end of an easement and is surrounded by office buildings and a river. He concluded that although they are allowed wall signs, they have not created the wall faces for such a use. Mr. Goe asked if the vacant Nielsen Dairy property had any development potential. Mr. McHugh stated that the property is for sale and could be developed. He went on to say that this property did not have adequate access. Mr. Goe asked how they would deal with the possibility of this property being developed and further obstructing Homewood Suites' visibility. Mr. McHugh stated that any development of the Nielsen Dairy property would be a few years away, and he hoped that the hotel would be established by then. He explained that it was important to have adequate signage when Homewood Suites is first getting established so that the public could become familiar with the hotel. Mr. Nesheim stated that there were no parties present who were opposed to the variance request. Board of Adjustment Minutes STAFF REBUTTAL: APPLICANT'S REBUTTAL: Page 5 Mr. Wilson clarified that the maximum size of a wall sign, regardless of the size of the wall, would be 150 sq. ft. He went on to say that under the Sign Code the maximum sign area for a free- standing sign can not exceed 100 sq. ft. per side. Staff stated that they were not aware that the State was still considering permitting Homewood Suites to have a freeway sign. If the State does allow the applicant to have a freeway sign, there would not be a need to increase the sign to 237 sq. ft. since they would then have adequate signage. Mr. McHugh stated that exhibits "F" and "F1" indicate the impacts of the sign with and without the variance. He went on to say that there is no guarantee that they will obtain permission from the State for the freeway signage. Mr. McHugh noted that without the variance, the sign would be fairly insignificant and unreadable. Mr. Goe asked if the sign would be lighted. Mr. McHugh said that it would be lighted. Mr. Nesheim called for a ten minute recess at 8:30 p.m. Mr. Nesheim reconvened the meeting at 8:37 p.m. and the Board began their deliberations. MR. LOCKHART MOVED THAT BASED ON THE STAFF'S REPORT AND THE TESTIMONY OF THE APPLICANT, CRITERIA "A" HAS NOT BEEN MET. MR. GOE SECONDED THE MOTION; MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. LOCKHART MOVED THAT BASED ON THE STAFF'S REPORT AND THE TESTIMONY OF THE APPLICANT, CRITERIA 'B" HAS NOT BEEN MET. MR. GOE SECONDED THE MOTION; MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. GOE MOVED THAT BASED ON THE STAFF REPORT AND OTHER TESTIMONY GIVEN THIS EVENING, CRITERIA "C" HAS BEEN MET. MR. LOCKHART SECONDED THE MOTION; MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. GOE MOVED THAT BASED ON THE STAFF REPORT AND THE TESTIMONY GIVEN BY MR. MCHUGH, CRITERIA "D" HAS NOT BEEN MET. MR. LOCKHART SECONDED THE MOTION; MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Board of Adjustment Minutes Page 6 MR. LOCKHART MOVED THAT BASED ON THE STAFF'S REPORT AND '1 TESTIMONY OF THE APPLICANT, CRITERIA "E" HAS NOT BEEN MET. MR. GOE SECONDED THE MOTION; MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. GOE MOVED THAT BASED ON THE STAFF REPORT AND THE APPLICANT'S TESTIMONY, CRITERIA "F" HAS BEEN MET. MR. LOCKHART SECONDED THE MOTION; MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. LOCKHART MOVED THAT BASED ON THE STAFF REPORT AND THE APPLICANT'S TESTIMONY, CRITERIA "G" HAS BEEN MET. MR. GOE SECONDED THE MOTION. DURING DISCUSSION, MR. GOE POINTED OUT THAT THE INTENT OF THE SIGN CODE WAS TO REDUCE THE VISUAL CLUTTER, AND INCREASING ' I ' RE SIGNAGE BY NEARLY 500% OF THAT ALLOWABLE BY THE CODE, WOULD REPRESENT A PUBLIC NUISANCE WHETHER OR NOT IT ADVERSELY AFFECTED THE PUBLIC'S SAFETY. MOTION PASSED BY A VOTE OF 3 -1 WITH MR. GOE OPPOSED. MR. GOE MOVED THAT THE VARIANCE REQUEST BE DENIED BASED ON THE BOARD'S DECISION THAT CRITERIAS A, B, D, AND E HAVE NOT BEEN MET. MR. LOCKHART SECONDED THE MOTION; MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. During the Director's report, Moira Bradshaw briefed the Board on the Vision Tukwila project. ELECTION OF OFFICERS: MR. GOE MOVED TO RE -ELECT THE CURRENT OFFICERS (NESHEIM- CHAIR, LOCKHART -VICE CHAIR, SYLVIA SCHNUG - SECRETARY); MRS. REGEL SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION WAS APPROVED BY A VOTE OF 3 -1 WITH MR. LOCKHART OPPOSED. MR. LOCKHART MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:00 P.M.; MR. GOE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Prepared by, Sylvia Schnug, Secretary CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6925 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. (This information may be found on your tax statement) Address. (206) 883 -1200 SIGN COr7 VARIANCE APPLICATION 2661 BEL -RED RD #202 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 1. SIGN CODE SECTION (TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 19) FROM WHICH YOU ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE: 19.32.140(c) 2. DESCRIBE THE VARIANCE ACTION WHICH YOU ARE REQUESTING: INCREASE IN FREESTANDING SIGN AREA, FROM 50 SQ.FT. TO 100 SQ.FT.( D.'aAELC= 3. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) Quarter: NW/ SW Section: 24 Township: 23 N R ange: 4E 4. APPLICANT:* Name' EDWARD MCHUGH - ARCHITECT �∎— Signature• _ -A .41 Date: 2 2— * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 5. PROPERTY Name. ',17/4/1/3 OWNER Address. ` '/ ��"4' � il Yom- 4TGf /,7 // "s Zi4 7/4S Phon : 3!P 33 f a3- �� ��. 9 I /WE,[signature(s) _ swear that I /we f owner( s) or contract purchaser(s) _.____..._... , in this applicano I and that the foregoing statements and answer' contained ut this application are true and correct to the i i i best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: f, ?Z FEE 0 6 1992. 1 SIGN CODE VARIANCE ti• "LICATION Page 2 6. WHY IS THIS VARIANCE BEING REQUESTED? The maximum sign area and size allow- able for a freestanding sign under the sign code does not give Homewood Suites the minimum visibility necessary to serve its purpose. Homewood Suites location has extreme, unique characteristics including: no street frontage; extreme dis- tances from which our sign must be identified and view obstructions. 7. DOES YOUR REQUEST MEET THE VARIANCE CRITERIA? The Board of Adjustment will base its decision on the specific criteria shown in bold below. You are solely responsible for justifying why your property should not have to satisfy the same development standards which all other properties/ projects must meet. The Board must decide that your variance request meets all seven criteria. Be specific; a "yes" or "true" is not a sufficient response. Additional sheets should be attached if needed. A. The variance as approved shall not constitute a grant of special privilege which is inconsistent with the intent of this sign code, nor which contravenes the limitation on use of property specified by the zoning classification in which this property is located. Example: Explain how your requested variance would not give you a special privilege in your use of the property in relation to the requirements imposed on adjacent and neighboring properties and on properties with the same zone classification. RESPONSE:No Special Privile e. Granting of the requested variance will not result in a special privilege for this applicant since the applicant is merely seeking rights which are comparable to others in the vicinity, particularly other hotels. Visibility and easy identity are important for any hotel and adequate sign - age is requried in order to achieve this goal. The height and area proposed for the Homewood Suites freestanding sign are nec- essary to achieve a reasonable amount of visibility in order to assist guests, visitors and vendors in identifying the location of the hotel and assisting them in arriving at the site in the (continued, see attached) The Planning Staff has provided some examples to help you respond to each criteria. Please feel free to use or ignore these as you see fit. The Board will make a decision based on the bold criteria, not staff examples. B. That the variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location, location or surroundings of the subject property to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is located. SIGN CODE VARIANCE APPLICATION LOCATION: 6925 SOUTHCENTER BLVD APPLICANT: EDWARD MCHUGH - ARCHITECT ATTACHMENTS: 7. A. (continued) most direct way possible. This is consistent with the stated purpose of the Sign Code, referenced in Section 19.04.020, which is to allow for visual communication which will enhance safety, while at the same time mini- mizing potential street clutter and distraction. 7. B. (continued) that is, for the most part, surrounded by the Green River. Its unique characteristics distinguish the sub- ject property form most any other property in the gen- eral vicinity, particularly those properties which are developed with hotel uses. Consequently, in order to attain the same rights of other hotel users and prop- erty owners in the area, the requested sign code vari- ance is necessary to afford the applicant comparable rights of visibility and identity. 7. C. (continued) way of traveling to the site. This will reduce the amount of circuitous trips by motorists who might oth- erwise be lost and having difficulty in finding the site. As a result of the unique location and configu- ration of the site, the freestanding sign will not im- pair the view or otherwise be an obstruction for any nearby owner. SIGN CODE VARIANCE i PLICATION Page3 Example: Does a special property characteristic such as size, shape or topography, com- bined with the zoning code requirement, prevent you from using your property in the manner of adjacent properties or other like -zoned properties? Special circumstances should not be due to: 1) actions by past or present property owners or leasing property before knowing Code restrictions; or 2) actions which have already been compensated for (i.e., the State condemns a portion of land for 1 -5 construction and compensates the owner for the diminished value of the remaining parcel. RESPONSE: Special Circumstances. The subject property has a very unique location, as well as unusual shape and configuration. The site has no street frontage and is separated from the near- est streets, Southcenter Blvd. and Interurban Ave. by distances of approximately 320 feet and 800 feet, respectively. It is sit- uated approximately 1000 feet from I -405 and has office buildings and other structures in the intervening area, thereby reducing the visibility of the subject property from both the nearest . public streets and the interstate freeway. The subject property is located at the far southeastern corner of a peninsula of land (continued, see attached) C. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is located. Example: Would granting your request cause any harm, injury, or interference with uses of adjacent and neighboring properties? (Consider traffic, views, light, aesthetic impacts, etc.) RESPONSE: No Material Detriment. The requested variance will not re- sult in any adverse impact for any surrounding property owner or user. The subject sign will be substantially separated by dis- tance and intervening development from the nearest public street frontage. Consequently, there will be no resulting sign clutter along street frontage nor will this result in a distraction for motorists. To the contrary, the proposed sign would enhance pub- lic safety and minimize the distractions by providing a clear communication to guests or vendors traveling to the hotel site of its location and assist them in finding the most efficient (continued, see attached) SIGN CODE VARIANCE k 'LICATION Page 4 D. That the special conditions and circumstances prompting the variance request do not result from the actions of the applicant. RESPONSE: No Self- Imposed Special Circumstances. The special circum- stances pertaining to the subject property are natural conditions relating to the location of the site and its configuration. Its substantial distance and separation from the nearest public street is a condition that has not been created by the applicant. The applicant is striving to overcome this situation by providing an adequate sign to meet the needs of its customers. visitors and vendors_ To do ntherwisP world he a disservice to its patrons and invitees_ E. That the variance as granted represents the least amount of deviation from pre- scribed regulations necessary to accomplish the purpose for which the variance is sought and which is consistent with the stated intent of this code. Example: Describe other alternatives for signage of your business. Why were these alter- natives rejected? The purpose of the Code is to establish standards for signs so that the streets of Tukwila appear orderly and safety is increased by minimizing duffer and distraction. RESPONSE: Minimum Variance Needed. If the proposed sign were to be visitors and vendors. While a larger sign with greater height • .- • - - • • ■ - _ • • • . . _ • - - • to the minimum necessary to achieve its communication goals_ The applicant has sought to minimize the area and height of the sign in order to comply with sign code regulations. SIGN CODE VARIANCE i, PLICATION F. That granting of the variance shall result in greater convenience to the public in identifying the business location for which a sign code variance is sought. Page 5 RESPONSE:Public Convenience. The proposed sign will facilitate hotel guests and the general public in identifying the location of the Homewood Suites Hotel and will permit them to arrive at the site li i.n .f the •- u. 1 1 -•• sign rnrde r egnl at nns in this i nstanre wnnl d he r.nntrary to the pi�hl i n r•nnveni ene and interest in that the resulting sign wnul d pnt hp reasnnahl y visible and wnul rl not result in efferti vP r om- mnni r•ati nn of the l nr•ati nn of the suhjer•t prnpPrty _ G. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a public nuisance or ad- versely affect the public safety. Example: Would granting the variance result in a sign which interferes with traffic and street improvements, signage and traffic flows? RESPONSE:No Public Nuisance. The subject property is substantially separated from the nearest public right -of -way. Therefore, the size of the sign will not in any way impair traffic circulation. To the contrary, by providing reasonable identity and effectively communicating the location of the site, it will enhance traffic circulation by reducing circuitous driving. Additionally, the proposed freestanding sign will not obscure the views of the gen- eral public nor any individual property owner. Furthermore, the i•n will •• • -• clutter or distraction, or otherwise u•- - - • _ . • 11 - • • , • • • • II - • • - 11 • • o • . - • sign will rather provide positive and beneficial impacts for the aforementioned reasons. CITY OF TUKWILA I • • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 9,IGN CO'E VARIANCE e G 1S92 APPLICATION 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 1. SIGN CODE SECTION (TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE '1T1'LE 19) FROM WHICH YOU ARE REQUESTING A VARIANCE: 19.32.140(c) 2. DESCRIBE THE VARIANCE ACTION WHICH YOU ARE REQUESTING: INCREASE IN FREESTANDING SIGN AREA, FROM 50 SQ.FT. TO 100 SQ.FT. 3. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or ;,if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) 6925 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. Quarter: NW /SW Section: 24 Township: 23N R ange: 4E (This information may be found on your tax statement) 4. APPLICANT:* Name-_____ Meyer Sign Co., Inc. (Frank Haynes) 926 N. 165th Address:- Seattle, WA 98133 ' P e; ,_ (206) 624 -4243 Signature Date. 4 .4 v &u , i4e ) * The applicant is the p rson whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 5. PROPERTY Name- . 1 SLO - =' VE -4/7` OWNER //jj Z14 Address• ` '/ /16 ? Yom . TGf /�TbGHES 7/4S7 Phon • sii 3r2- P -3J I /WE,[signature(s)] - 1 swear that I /we the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) ofr 19p rat Ai�vp. ed in this applicatio and that the foregoing statements and an werkeo fained�u1 application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: /.'- V FE B 0 6 1992 1 1 1- , cr �•i U;' . i .. iJi::'fiiLA fILANNiUG DEPT, RESPONSE: _ SIGN CODE VARIANC .::4PPLICATION Please refer to OVERVIEW and Criteria A & Criteria B attached. 7. DOES YOUR REQUEST MEET THE VARIANCE CRITERIA? Page 2 6. WHY IS THIS VARIANCE BEING REQUESTED? To increase the freestanding area from the allowable 50 square feet per side, double faced to 100 square feet on one side only. Reasons are as noted in response to questions in attached document. The Board of Adjustment will base its decision on the specific criteria shown in bold below. You are solely responsible for justifying why your property should not have to satisfy the same development standards which all other properties/ projects must meet. The Board must decide that your variance request meets all seven criteria. Be specific; a "yes" or "true" is not a sufficient response. Additional sheets should be attached if needed. The Planning Staff has provided some examples to help you respond to each criteria. Please feel free to use or ignore these as you see fit. The Board will make a decision based on the bold criteria, not staff examples. A. The variance as approved shall not constitute a grant of special privilege which is inconsistent with the intent of this sign code, nor which contravenes the limitation on use of property specified by the zoning classification in which this property is located. Example: Explain how your requested variance would not give you a special privilege in your use of the property in relation to the requirements imposed on adjacent and neighboring properties and on properties with the same zone classification. B. That the variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to the size, shape, topography, location, location or surroundings of the subject property to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is located. SIGN CODE VARIAN' 1PPLICATION l Page 3 Example Does a special property characteristic such as size, shape or topography, com- bined with the zoning code requirement, prevent you from using your property in the manner of adjacent properties or other like -zoned properties? Special circumstances should not be due to: 1) actions by past or present property owners or leasing property before knowing Code restrictions; or 2) actions which have already been compensated for (i.e., the State condemns a portion of land for 1 -5 construction and compensates the owner for the diminished value of the remaining parcel. RESPONSE.— C. That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is located. Example: Would granting your request cause any harm, injury, or interference with uses of adjacent and neighboring properties? (Consider traffic, views, light, aesthetic impacts, etc.) RESPONSE:_ Refer to Criterias A and B attached. Refer to Criteria C attached. S. SIGN CODE VARIANCr ' PPLICATION ( Page 4 D. That the special conditions and circumstances prompting the variance request do not result from the actions of the applicant. RESPONSE: E. That the variance as granted represents the least amount of deviation from pre- scribed regulations necessary to accomplish the purpose for which the variance is sought and which is consistent with the stated intent of this code. Refer to Criteria D attached. Example: Describe other alternatives for signage of your business. Why were these alter- natives rejected? The purpose of the Code is to establish standards for signs so that the streets of Tukwila appear orderly and safety is increased by minimizing clutter and distraction. RESPONSE: Refer to Criteria E attached. • SIGN CODE VARIANCE( PPLICATION ., F. That granting of the variance shall result in greater convenience to the public in identifying the business location for which a sign code variance is sought. RESPONSE:_ RESPONSE: Refer to Criterias F & G attached. Page 5 G. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a public nuisance or ad- versely affect the public safety. Example: Would granting the variance result in a sign which interferes with traffic and street improvements, signage and traffic flows? Refer to Criterias F and G plus OVERVIEW attached. OVERVIEW: RESPONSES TO SIGN CODE VARIANCE CRITERIA QUESTIONS (APPLICATION O 4TH, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING (CONTINUED FROM APRIL 7TH TO JUNE 1992) On January 2nd a variance application for the standard Homewood Suites pylon sign (double faced with 238 square feet per face) was disapproved. The staff report to the board denied that any of the seven decision criteria had been meet. The Board of Adjustment found Criteria C, F, and G had been met. It is our intent to show the remaining criteria are met with this submission. The revised size is 5 2/3' by 17 1/2' feet or 100 square feet total, only 42% of the original size requested. Additionally, it is a single, rather that double, faced sign. With Staff permission, the sign code allows for 50 square feet per side plus 25% more in freeway interchange areas (which this sign qualifies for) or a total of 62 1/2 square feet per face. We are requesting 100 square feet total, on one side only. The three acre, seven building hotel complex does not have street frontage (the street stops short of the facility), but does have approximately 355 lineal feet of property facing toward 1 -405 and 380 feet facing toward Interurban Avenue. Either of those frontage amounts are more that enough to qualify for 75 square feet of sign area per sign face plus the freeway interchange additional amount of 25% (with permission) for a total of 93.75 square feet per side - -or a total of 187.5 square feet for both sides - -all within code, were we allowed to use the frontage measurements. The concern of Dimension Development is not only for the convenience of our guests but also for their safety and the safety of the 115,000 vehicle operators (circa 200,000 vehicle occupants) and that use this portion of 1 -405 every day. We are confident neither the city fathers nor state traffic engineers feel comfortable with a traffic circumstance that impinges upon the safety of freeway travelers. * * ** Response to Criterion A and Criterion B. The requested sign area has been reduced from the 237.57 square feet double faced sign requested in the January 2nd Board of Adjustment meeting and turned down. The application was reentered for a single faced sign with 100 square feet total, each face. We are modifying our request to a single faced sign of 100 square feet (there will be no copy or message on the back side of the sign). The sign code allows for 50 square feet for each of two faces of a sign. The sign's message will be visible only from the direction of 1 -405. It will be the hotel's only on- premis advertising oriented to vendors, vacationers, and business guests traveling the freeway. On the north side of 1 -405, there are no "public service" businesses oriented to the freeway except Homewood Suites. The area businesses are: State Farm's (business, not sales) offices, the business parks of Fort Dent I, and Fort Dent 11 (which are neither retail or commercial), and the Fort Dent Park. None have expressed interest in freeway oriented signage that would, or would not, require a variance procedure. The "special privilege" prohibition in Criteria A is a moot point- -there are no "same kind" (public service) businesses that desire freeway oriented signs. The only other developable properties in the area are situated adjacent to 1 -405, or located on Interurban Avenue and will not have the identification problems Homewood Suites does. The only other property is the parcel adjacent to Fort Dent 11 where the property owner plans to build another office park called Fort Dent III. Th old dairy property may well become a parking lot for a business located on the other side of the freeway. All public service and retail businesses in the Interurban Avenue interchange area are south of 1 -405, including the massive Southcenter complex. The lay of the land already commands an "eyes right" from all motorists. These businesses are easily identifiable and have visible access. The Homewood Suites site has unusually unique characteristics, including: no access on three sides of the property because of the Green River wrapping around the site - -the only access being at the end of a minimally traveled, residential - looking, dead -end road; no street frontage; view obstructions (the high power line structures, old barn roof, and trees), yet it is only 750 feet to the freeway interchange and within the 1000' freeway access sign provision of the code. It has a straight -line visual distance of + -900 feet to 1 -405. The property is separated from the nearest streets, Southcenter Boulevard and Interurban Avenue by distances of 320 and 800'. Comparatively, other businesses in the area already enjoy special privilege. The Homewood Suites hotel complex sits on approximately three acres of land and has seven distinct buildings. There is about 355 feet of frontage facing toward 1 -405 and 380 feet facing toward Interurban Avenue. The City of Tukwila has zoned the area to accommodate public service facilities such as hotel complexes that must have viable identification in order to adequately serve the public. The March 26th staff report states " all businesses want vendors and visitors to see their sign from the public right -of- way ". The area's only businesses, State Farm, Fort Dent 1, and II are not retail - commercial or public service oriented and have no need for freeway signage. State Farm is a service agency, not a sales facility, and does not want people traipsing around trying to buy insurance. Neither they nor Fort Dent are currently interested in a "shared identity" sign. Shared signage is not an option at this juncture. The "hundreds of businesses located in the interior areas of business parks" spoken of in the March 26th staff response are not public service facilities that draw traffic directly from the interstate. Poor identification of a public service facility causes inattention to freeway traffic while drivers try to locate the facility and that will cause accidents. Additionally, it is to the advantage of the few businesses in the immediate area to have Homewood Suites viewably signed from 1 -405 because it provides an identification landmark as well as an overnight base for travelers planning commerce with the adjacent businesses. There is no contravention of either Criteria A or B. Response to Criterion C (C was approved as having been met on Jan 2nd.) The sign will be located approximately 85' from the recreational trail. The top of the sign will be lower than the top most portion of Homewood Suites' roof units. It cannot be seen from either the park area, guest rooms of the hotel, or Fort Dent II and only incidentally, if at all, from Fort Dent 1 or the State Farm Building. Views of Mount Rainier cannot be impaired as the sign will be nestled in the cove area between building B -2 and B -3, and will set mainly between the top of the hotel roof line and the roofline gutter above the third floor. Even if it were visible, trees and hills on the south side of 1 -405 are considerably higher than the hotel buildings and sign and they would first obscure views of Mount Rainier. Criterion C was approved on January 2nd. The proposed sign will enhance public safety and minimize distractions by providing clear communication to vacationers, business - travelers, and venders looking for or traveling to the hotel site and will, in fact, enhance public safety. The sign is designed to preclude "materially detrimental impact to public welfare or injury to property or improvements in the vicinity... ", as stated in the code. It will improve other property values by increasing public awareness of area businesses and augmenting their business activities. The sign, however, is designed to address only 1 -405 traffic, as do the public service signs along the other side of the same stretch of freeway. Unless one is between the freeway and the sign, the message cannot be read because it will be positioned to face 1 -405. No one else will affected by it. Users of City /County recreational trail would not find the sign intrusive as the message will be far above them. Further, it has no illuminated translucent -face material with glare potential. The sign face background is metal and non - illuminated. The individual letters are metal channels (like a cookie cutter) with the only illumination being neon inside the U shaped channel sections of the letters. (See accompanying drawing detail in the back portion of this booklet.) There is no contravention of Criterion C. Response to Criterion D The land was /is zoned for public service businesses. The aforementioned "special conditions" noted in criteria A and B were pre- existing before Dimension Development first approached Tukwila and state bureaucracies for permission to build the hotel. The land use proposal was studied and various permissions were granted; the permits were issued. The architect's drawing of the complex that showed the building in perspective with a small ground sign was developed for national hotel franchise distribution by a firm in Memphis for "feel" and was not intended as a prototype of the signs required at the Tukwila site. The developer had every reason to expect adequate signage would be as available as the permit to build the hotel complex. The sign is far Tess impactful than the seven hospitality structures built on the site. The viability - -the integrity - -of comprehensive zoning is to aid and assist citizens and businesses of a community for the ultimate health and welfare of all. If the zoning of specific areas allows public service businesses or freeway interchange privileges then it is reasonable to assume adequate signage would also be allowed. The hotel's contrasting architecture - -the very thing that makes the buildings so environmentally attractive - -leads passersby to assume they are expensive condominiums, not a public service facility. Our effort to create beautiful architecture is thereby punished by not allowing a freeway identification sign. There is no contravention of Criterion D. Response to Criterion E The intent of the code concerns itself with public safety and environmental integrity. A 100 square feet single -faced sign, 900 feet from 1 -405 and 750 feet from the freeway interchange is a most modest request, the very least deviation necessary to be easily read and to serve vacationers and business travelers coming to, or passing through, Tukwila on the interstate. That the hotel must reach them in order to survive may not be a concern of the Board of Adjustment, but traffic flow and safety certainly is. Freeway travelers must be able to facilely read the sign so as to not impede the orderly flow of freeway traffic or endanger vehicle occupants. The building is already there; people will be looking for it-- people who vaguely remember the buildings' visage, people who know its general whereabouts, people who know only they are looking for a sign. It is a foregone conclusion the unsigned Homewood Suites complex will create additional freeway traffic confusion, and ultimately, accidents and ...perhaps worse. If the sign's 24" letters were smaller, they would too hard to be read, whatever the physiology of the sign, and the resulting confusion could create traffic hazards. There is no contravention of Criterion E. Response to Criterion F and Criterion G (F and G were approved as having been met on Jan 2nd.) 1 -405 at the Interurban Avenue interchange carries approximately 115,000 vehicles per day - -or a monthly average of 3.45 million. That is more than six million people every month! During rush hours, there are many thousand car occupants passing per hour; people preoccupied with work, home, school, kids, a thousand things. They are often rushed, and many are driving a bit zany. Under these circumstances, travelers looking for Homewood Suites need adequate signage to recognize the complex and determine its whereabouts. The sign is designed to be read from the freeway, and essentially only from the freeway. It is single faced. The translucent illuminated (Plexiglas) background originally specified has been replaced with a non - illuminated metal face and only the channeled letters illuminated with double -tube neon. By "channeling" the letters and inserting neon within them, light is captured and directed in a given direction with little ancillary spillage. The letters will read further and with greater ease, and can be easily read from 1 -405 with the size indicated. As one drives north -bound past the hotel facility, they will have 20 to 30 seconds or more of sign exposure, depending on traffic, to read the sign and prepare to move over to exit at Renton. Southbound, there is about the same amount of time where the sign is readable and to allow the driver to negotiate his vehicle over to the Southcenter exit lane. The three large photographs show the size relationship of the sign to the hotel complex and immediate area. According to David Miller's Traffic Engineering Principles applied to On Premise Signage, after a driver notices a sign, the Simple Reaction Distance is the time it takes the driver to simply see a sign and crisis brake to a stop. The Anticipatory Reaction Distance is the added time it takes when a driver sees a sign, then safely prepare to stop. In toto, a driver must notice the sign, read and understand it, and then react (by braking, moving into another lane, preparing exiting the freeway, etc.). At 55 miles per hour it takes 825 feet simple reaction time to stop, or 1100 feet anticipatory reaction time. There are a other factors that affect a specific driver and those in vehicles around him. Some of them are: 1) Vehicle operator eyesight. The average motorist's vision is 20/40. Traffic engineers know this; traffic signs are built with this fact in mind. In the interest of public safety, freeway oriented public service businesses ought to be permitted adequately -sized signs to assure easy recognition in time for viewers to exit the interstate without creating traffic hazards for themselves or others. Commercial signage is not directly in front of the driver, as are traffic signs, but at an angle off to the side of the highway. By having to unduly look for a public service business or, having seen it late, rush across lanes of traffic to reach the exit lane, creates particular public safety risk. Yet this circumstance is often overlooked by both zoning boards and sign buyers. Poorly or inadequately signed public service facilities increases accidents. 2) General area familiarity. Whether of not the driver is familiar with either the logo style and color of the sign, or the building style, if it is unique to the specific company (as it is with Homewood Suites) are sign size factors. SYNOPSIS I RECAP 3) General area complexity. The complexity of a diverse visual environment and /or traffic flow patterns impacts specific business identification. A local driver will have many landmarks to remind him he is approaching Homewood Suites, and a stranger, Perhaps none, other than the building physiology or the sign. It is primarily the sign than identifies a public service business to travelers. 4) Other factors. "Traffic flow" speeds; weather and road conditions, complexity of a freeway interchange to drive along, exit ramps, off-road distractions, etc. are all players in the game of public service considerations. There is no contravention of Criteria F and G. The code, as it now reads, allows for a 50 square feet sign, 35 feet in the air, or with the 25% "add -on" 62.5 square feet and 43.75 feet in height. Homewood Suites can meet that criteria and put up a double or single -faced sign with + -24" letters by putting both words in a single line with a background field the same size as the letters themselves. However, the logo style would have to change somewhat to accommodate the letter height maximization by dropping the background field and distorting the letters' spacing and width versus height, by squeezing them taller. Because there would be no background field to frame the sign it would be a far uglier, harder to read and would do disservice to both Homewood Suites and the area's esthetics. Compare the two versions shown on the last two pages of this booklet. Homewood Suites hotel complexes are designed and furnished to project a warm, homey atmosphere, rather like attractive condominiums. The persona is inviting and fits well in the area selected. The Tukwila facility has seven clapboard buildings painted northwest grey, one to three stories high, with gabled roofs. The apex of the three story buildings is 41', or 45' if the vents, etc. are measured. The complex is more visual- environment sensitive that any of the area's hotels, retail or commercial buildings. We chose not provide a lot of high, flat wall space on which to attach signs. Because the low buildings do fit in so well, nestled in a U -turn in the river, across from the community golf course, they look very residential. It is essential we have the unobtrusive pole sign identification. In the last three pages of photos are pictures of the surrounding environmentally insensitive businesses. By any stretch of the imagination, what Homewood Suites is requesting is quantum leaps beyond the views presented by Riverview Farms, rail road tracks, the top -soil and sawdust facility, the myriad junked automobiles, and third -world appearing homes and accompanying trash. We pray the Board of Adjustment will consider all the factors included in the criteria response as they vote on Homewood Suites' request. 2'_0" 1 > + THIS SIGN IS ALLOWED UNDER THE CODE. It is 50 square feet in total size and 35 feet from the top of the sign to the ground (or 43.75' high if allowed by the Planning Staff). The letters (and the cabinet) are 24" tall and 25 feet long. 25' THIS SIGN IS ALLOWED BY TUKWILA SIGN CODE : > �.. THIS SIGN WOULD REQUIRE A VARIANCE. It is single faced. It measures a total of 100 square feet, including the background, and is 43.75' from the top of the sign to the ground. The letters, like the code -legal sign on the previous page, are 24" tall. The cabinet, in order to attractively frame the letters and give them them an aesthetically pleas- ing background, has been increased to 5.67' x 17.6'. The framed copy is aesthetically pleasing, much easier to read And presents less of a traffic hazard than the smaller sign which requires vehicle op- erators to search for the hotel and/or sign, or try to read the inaedquately sized one on the previous page. Additionally, the larger sign presents a good- neighbor image to the traveling public that speaks well for both the hotel complex and the city of Tukwila . 926 NORTH 165TH SEATTLE, WA 98133 206.624.4243 FAX 206.382.5444 Pv•' MEYER SIGN C n IA P A N Y N C 1721 SIMPSON AVENUE ABERDEEN, WA 98520 206.532.1111 FAX 206.533.2841 Dimensional view of the letter style that will go on the sign. The letters are open faced "cookie cutter" with neon (repre- sented by the dash'lines) nestled within the letter so as to be most visable when positioned in front of the sign. 2206 PACIFIC STREET BELLINGHAM, WA 98225 206.676.6077 FAX 206.734.9416 ~$ HOMEW00D SUITES HOTEL COMPLEX c z -4 0 z z 0 rn MANUFACTURES MINERAL CO. Edward A *Mush Arearm% (204) 141 -2100 1111 114-1.4 INI tun. 4202 •.I.wr. 0.102.41.. 10000 HOMEWOOD SU17'ES 10•000 WU .I4r OWL r �� I NYNw2Mw MOON NOR! NNw OWSW 0 . IIRd1 COMO MC. WOW ✓ aw ▪ r rwr 0041r Ir. ,44 w•• r rr r . 42H.n IOW or • ..1010 W • mi SP1 ':• 44PQSED FREESTANDING ••q1:+1.-:.LOCATION roar DEBT I%. rOPT OENT 12 \ varANT Urricr eU11OUG LMID ter. Yoe. HAMPTON INTT HOMEWOOD SI IITES HOTEL COUPLE% 0 7. 0 z MAMJrACTUPS UIN!PAL CO. Edreti • MMupw AKMMc11 (IM/ AI -•i5 (Pm „ ..y P. ...... ..r� A ewe HOMEWOOD SUITES • KNm 1$31 NM tele Mt len. r • 101•M �oInI QYaPI/w MOW, 5C tele SP1 FORT OFFIC DENT #1 F. BUILDING STATE FARM INSURANCE CO. OFFICE BUILDING /SERVICE CENTER PROPOSED FREESTANDING SIGN LOCATION VACANT LOT (FOR SALE) FORT DENT #2 OFFICE BUILDING 40' INGRESS - EGRESS UTILITY EASEMENT rn VACANT LAND AND NIELSON DAIRY FORT DENT #2 PARKING LOT Re' RI 02/114INT M7 10 110110111101 ix urozort MIA BUILDING 84 Ib• -, In. • a-1 v J s ruR r BUILDING BJ L 41 In • +r -11,r J STORY U BUILDING - Al ri r STORY r L.i J_ u J HOMEWOOD SUITES HOTEL 111 OAST KM •n M.. 1111043 r I I I BUKDINC. B2 J STORY BUIL 08 1 / • 11' -.• 2 STORY 1r 1 ■ 11111111111111111■1111116aRilisaiimilipp BUILDING E5 2 STORY Y 5 R 3P1avINA Or wi4 1771 041 1100 G REEN OYL • RIVE 00.11 IRM [Award A W.Uu h ArahMwfi (2011) ■0 -1100 1001 0M-0• • 1.0. 9301 M M•m. •••l.yy 111100• OM Me HOMEWOOD SUITES mimeo 3110 Is176 t.ar ►.r HAW C+r44.411w 10 MILLS 0106011 RWONOT WIPN(I IC Dw✓+a rn . 4,4.es.. •R M SP2 WITHOUT FREEWAY IDENTIFICATION THE COMPLEX WILL BE MISTAKEN FOR CONDOS WHERE THE SIGN IS TO GO VIEW OF INTERURBAN FROM SIGN SITE VIEW TOWARD 1-405 FROM SIGN SITE VIEW FROM 1-405 TO SIGN SITE This photo is a vier of Homewood Suites from the t. to floor of Fort Dent II. Noie the trees and the rruntains are higher than the buildings. The sign cannot seen from here nor can it obscure the view of Mount Rainier. „s+-H.e......:':N:: rr... „ K.::: af. 1�:':; JtY.' W:.. v:! iY., ir.. �.. �il^:•• Y.•. r.^ ne.. nl. veMt¢ L. h4x, '�?Y�Y�?Yti }. "�na.;e.... ,'n. i1J nC,�;`,?C. This photo is a view of the golf course and playing field area from the top floor of Fort Dent II. The sign cannot seen from here. It certainly cannot be seen from the park. SINGLES FROM S55 FREE CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST HBO HEATED SPA COMP HOTEL IN FRE INTERC AR TING IGNS WAY ANGE A HAMPTON INN EMBASSY SUITES V3 Et EMBASSY SUITES COMPETING HOTEL SIGNS IN FREEWAY INTERCHANGE AREA HOMEWOOD SUITES • LONGACRES TRACK OPENS APRIL I PACKAGES AVAILABLE ALL 400MS AA No viable sign permitted • NendeCs Inn COMPETING HOTEL SIGNS IN FREEWAY INTERCHANGE AREA Views cf the Neighlorhood • " • • • • . . ■;' • • Segner inc. ARVIN VANDER VEEN • • , .11 • : • , Nt.usuly 3 1 711711W: / • • , • 1 „1. .1 • ••• • J 1' t 1 NL i � .. I l i . - 1 -1 ; �� I� i ci VI' LA NN 1I�.I1..'+• DEPT. f • PL VICINITY MAP PROPOSED FREESTANDING SIGN LOCATION 4, FORT DENT 52 OFFICE BUILDING STATE FARM INSURANCE CO. OFFICE BUILDING /SERVICE CENTER I RIVER VACANT LAND —110111" 2 ta 14 / V FORT DENT PARK HAMPTON INN HOMEWOOD SUITES HOTEL COMPLEX z -1 0 z. z 0 m S W G R A D Y / W Y ' - J 2 g / MANUFACTUR MINERAL CO. Edwcrd A McHugh Architect! (roc, w, -1200 i!!, Ni -INN N weednrew 2,1008 wY(r630 SUMS 1093. Irwlt.a a Witt,/ CNpmca,n LKMVMM u.I CON." WC. oN • MEIN • M� HOMEWOOD SUITES IKRZON IOf[{S a.N hwgw .[MrI IMP N• 6.1. 1 pan ur SP1 • • w F 0 ro i992 ( :f f F'� ?!'•'i'I;i' 11 ”:I''r. STATE FARM INSURANCE PARKING LOT PROPOSED FREESTANDING SIGN LOCATION m.r.1lo. o.on •4• -.r mAMlfop �t GREE SITE PLAN -M. FORT DENT 112 PARKING LOT BUILDING 04 v-. .1' t /4 J STORY UILDINC 83 — 31 J STORY BUILDING B2 n'. a. HOMEWOOD SUITES HOTEL sn:u tia": " BUILDING C5 w•.a In.. ur 2 STORY IIIIUII wnu..a l.4 R i v E 0 rn not no. Edward A VCHu5h Archll.ct. 2 I ..MM• .w. WO #201 ...w.. r.o..n 2.000 Pr: HOMEWOOD SUITES .00030 surfs tau 7t..Hsa a 1.,»A•o K.RW toles 0...t 0..004 O(HIMYYI Is•.r.w. Mt. towleme .... 1 ' .�... ,..M K 11.1 *OA 47 SP2 • • g Vit&T I oti _7004.1-e : 2/,' A '-a D MAL &Rt ES1 TFANsLuGENT WHI rE con' CI-50=-A trze- NEON 7SPE 24 t?tA frO*.. 7 - • u r 1i; ! !Jo_ 1 Cri'v • P r:. . •■• __ N/ATIO . 5GALZ ey' -co ALtz2sivfr.E5LE .3 leg H F. TeH T. 35 _EISOMYYkirj_ INTE-FCH4Nae_121.___ Olt e' 41,, .'V jar '.t'' f r I.! 'fie, • C • .►mow ' r - . w .. • J. V 1 L -W 1. G •r 1. 40x7 EX TT Proposed Freestanding / Sign Location Homewood Suites .South Boundry // e 4 1Cr� -' W44•.. - • • • • 5 `�' # -f . • r,' 'A. • N• •• _ .... • µ ••, • lor •N'4'' . M '�htj y r '\r 4. = ' W E s ATTACHMENT D VIEW 2: NE CORNER, li!•. is flid. �.1��1,Itii• 17(''I Ijt lll; Pik;i � ( � hlli �I ' ���i'ji!�I�,'� I ' '� INTERURBAN AVENUE & SOUTHCENTER BLVD_ State Farm Insurance VIEW 3: Proposed Freestanding Sign Location\ • 41'. • • • • : /*/ Homewood Suites • "101 , FROM INTERURBAN AVENUE BRIDGE OVER GREEN RIVER .. alai.)�iYl. cn:::.:l:,A..l -a+::� , t�.cas'L �va�urFr:2�37 x>'f r \`arrx �.�: ••30.4.0.42 cvcu nat i1�IK1 i 1Ith PREPARED BY: CUMMINGS, INCORPORATED 200th Avenue South :u. zrus 7.J Nashville, Tennessee 37202 ATTACHMENT E 1 Westbound (Over 1,000 Feet Distance) 1 Westbound Exhibit #1 vlwxa, 5 pr ..i •. T. •V Y I,11 .'7�- �''•. .Interurban Avenue Bridge State Farm . aa+ 14t' 4. VIEW 4: FROM PROPOSED FREESTANDING SIGN LOCATION t1 c/ Dinitri Demopubs Inc. 0471CTS tA.K.o111t s.■ 0.i* De.m•••• Y.. 43 • I 'OMEN\ )11 SUIT! TUKWILA. WASHINGTON 0,rn CNK1.1 1_.1 117 U) FED 0 0 992 cii LA Pl...ANNNG IDEPT. STATE FARM INSURANCE PARKING LOT PROPOSED FREESTANDING SIGN LOCATION BUILDING 84 nt., lir • *1 ,/e 3 STORY WI AM 111 .0 BUILDING 08 V. • sr... .2 STORY HOMEWOOD SUITES HOTEL BUILDING 82 /rr-• lir s et, SlORY 8UJLDJWG 1:5 1 STORY 1COO■In UK Of le• 0.1004105 301. 5101 III. N. GR EE N SITE PLAN r • lar FORT DENT #2 PARKING LOT RIVER rn rn Edward A McHugh Architects WII-I200 2441 II'-Ped 11.44 11#14 4202 wantopor 44004 fn!ZZ'' HOMEWOOD SUITES 14:WEWECO A.1113 HOTEL franckkoed 1v1017 Coweatim 2051201 10203 0•14t C0111601 MITIOPIENT WOW. MC.. Milos 11. 1de 41. 144•114. tom 4* 0. 1442 M. • 510 SP2 } • , 1 I II .g o$ . Dv, " I 14 71,1 FIFE I 0 CA WM I I I WC IS 6 11111 UM III 111117 I I I I I I • I P TfAL 9N TRAN5LLICSNT GFOUNIP SSG' 1 gz9P-17SR ..._ .. ___ 5) 7 -,i) if - ; - .., -, . , 7 112 T, Ili P (.— Fli \ J ''" 5 _..) .:"..._ 1 1 i FEB 0 c - 1 CITY PLANNII\IGI3Ei-T. 1 1 .4v-re- p...L....z.,--stv".134-E. . 3g Ie 1 - .2/....JK.'").e.5.. A . 4 1 :WHIIE Can' .. t;'E. EL-5 VATIO A4 ` &" • Is g NOTES; OFLEXIBLE FACES WILL BE PANAFLEx MATERIAL SERIES 940 WHITE OR APPROVED EGUAL. @FLEXIBLE FACES SHALL BE OECORATED USING 3M TRANSLUCENT VINYL FILM •vTi95 S TEAL GREEN OR APPROvED'EOUAL. C)ThE FILM WILL BE APPLIED AS SPECIFIED 8Y THE FILM I.mNUFACTuRER. (D(USE FULL SIZE PATTERN OR APPROVED GRAPHICS FOR ACTUAL. SIZES AND LOCATION OF COPY. 1- 11'- 1" I di I - 1 FArc cicVATICII -c> " 431(01 ARe,4. : too -3a P HITE COPY TRIM LINE • TEAL GREEN TRANSLUCENT BACK GROUNO 5-) - FEB 0 (3 i992 CITY O It..JKWILA PLANNING DEPT. • L rli •—• c . , , s, . ,... 1 0 ) pli. \ (.:, ; i ... PLANNING r. ) iiiI__ j VICINITY MAP c*, $0•1,0 . .10241 VACANT LOT (FOR SALE) VACANT s LOT V (FOR t.P V4- SALE) FORT DENT #1 OFFICE BUILDING 4C <3 a STATE FARM INSURANCE CO. c p OFFICE BUILDING/SERVICE CENTER EXIT \I se FORT DENT #2 OFFICE BUILDING RIVER 10.111S.1..03 Yrkirt C•004‘1 VACANT LAND LSU 11 0 .1 1 • PROPOSED FREESTANDING SIGN LOCATION NIELSON DAIRY INTERSTATE t 405 SW GRADY WY 0 FORT DENT PARK HAMPTON INN HOMEWOOD SUITES HOTEL COMPLEX C3 r z 0 z 0 77 MANUFACTURES MINERAL CO. Edward A McHugh Archliocts us-12co 2441 1110-0144 Rood 4u. /222 Oe'Inv. VaehIngton $1100• _eni? HOMEWOOD SUITES KINVCCO 5=2 NOM Itsvhisal Raw, CorpcnUo hCOCCa HMS pm. EACMSON D0EU3P4Ort CIVIVNY. OC. 4044,4! 4,424.1. ft. ./. vovv 1V1 Vo• 141444--.. .1E14 SP1 • • Mao, . 90 •- 41 1 I •■••• • 9• • t•kil • ••• * • •‘• .16 ..t P.* g000. • p ••••( •. • • trottei. 41 0 . t11.1. ”yrictit ".• • • _ • • I Am • • • So 41. ' :1 " " .1 ''''' 1: ■! 14.1.0t, • ol$1 •■•• ■•■•.1 .1 M.. •-• 2 C tn w 0 0 0 w 0 1 1.111u.adm Shout: L1 of 1