Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit L92-0028 - LEE ASSOCIATES - SOUTHCENTER OIL FUEL STATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS)
L92-0028 SOUTHCENTER OIL 13435 INTERURBAN AVE S LEE ASSOCIATES SOUTHCENTER OIL FUEL STATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) DATE: May 14, 1992 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DEVELOPMENT OF A FUEL STATION WITH 112 - SQUARE -FOOT KIOSK FOR CARD -LOCK SALES, FUEL PUMP CANOPY WITH EIGHT FUELING POSITIONS, AND PERIMETER LANDSCAPING PROPONENT: SOUTHCENTER OIL LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: ADDRESS: 13435 INTERURBAN AV S PARCEL NO: . :000300 -0028 SEC /TWN /RNG: NW14 -23 -4 LEAD AGENCY:' 'CITY OF TUKWILA FILE NO: L92 -0028 The City•has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) :is 'not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2)(c). This de.ci was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information,on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. ****************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** This determin 199 is final and signed this L Rick Beeler, Responsible Official City of Tukwila, (206) 431 -3680 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 day of You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above signature date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Department of Community Development. ETEVEN J. KATTNEPI Architect R..KkJ M1r. May 12, 1992 9067\sepa Ms. Anne Siegenthaler Assistant Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. D.C.D. suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Ms. Siegenthaler, .. .. AOB6IT 1-I. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ENGINEERING 15E0 140th AVENUE. N.E. • SUITS BOO • EELLSVUE, WASHINGTON MOOS (EOS) 74S -4877 PAX (ROO) 74e -3E3S RE: Supplemental information for environmental review of proposed South Center Oil Card Lock Facility at 13435 Interurban Ave. S. Tukwila, Washington This letter is to provide clarification on answers contained in the SEPA checklist submitted with the South Center Oil proposal. We will include an emergency telephone on site for customers to use to report any emergency situation. The fuel tanks and piping will be models that meet State Department of Ecology and Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Authority requirements. All fill to be used on site will be clean and come from an approved site. Retail sales will be limited to Oil and Fuel. All equipment on site, including the temporary soil remediation equipment, shall meet the City of Tukwila noise standards. These answers are to be considered a part of the project proposal and are to be used in evaluation of the potential impacts of the project. Sincerely, Mark Cross Senior Planner cc: Mr. Jim Thorp, South Center Oil MDI1EnfiDi L MAY 12 1992 . CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. SOUTHCENTER CARDLOCK 84-RW41-12 FRONTAL IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED' C PROFILE ' : PAVING IMITS INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH SPRINKLER CAS COVERS 'OVERLAY 2" MINIMUM 0VERLAY.70 END:OF PR.JECT MATCH EXIST. STA.127+641(RT.1 19' 37 ':' 20137 ... MATCH EXIS INTERURBAN AVER C ERA , 149TES SHEET 17 • O 1 SL1i ILLUMINATION I'IAN. ' 2 01.1. CI IANNCI.IZATION MAN. 3 COORDINATE ADJUSTMENT TO (MADE OF EXISTING OAS VALVE WITH WASHINGTON NATURAL OAS 4 IICMOVE EXISTING BLOCK TRAFFIC CURD 5 IILMOVE EXIST INC) 2)IIRUDEO cunt). O MATCH NEW Wllll EXISTING 7 CAUTION IS ADVISED CONTRACTOR SHOULD HAVE GAS LINE LOCATED AND POTHOLED PRIO11 TO CONSTRUCTION OF STORM DRAIN PIPE. STA 125 . LT) STA. 120 • 05122110 STA. 176.52 (21' Rl) STA 120. 19(/0'LT) O IILMOVE EXISTING GUI ER O CONSIIIUCI CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PER TUKWILA STANDARD DETAILS . STA 124 • 02 (111) AS SHOWN COMMERCIAL. STA.J20__O7 ((L1( 75' WIDE COMMERCIAL / --- STA 176. To (RT) 72WIOE ----- COLIMERCIA - • - '7 ' &127_79 R2) 72 WIDE COMMERCIAL 10 NLCONSI RUC T COMMERCIAL ASPIIALT DRIVEWAY WITHIN LIMITS SHOWN TO MAICII BACK or NEW CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. STA 120.07 (LT) 11 CIIVAIL 111111 JOINT DY GRINDING PAVEMENT TO LIMITS AND DEPTH 5) TOWN 12 CIIIAIE MIT JOINT TO MATCII EXISTING ASPHALT DRIVEWAY. 17 STA. 120. 50 ADJUST EXISIING MONUMENT CASE AND COVER TO GRADE. 14 SAWCUT 011 WIIEELCUT AT PAVEMENT EDGE. 15 REMOVE EXISTING GUAM) RAIL. 10 11IMOVE EXISTING TRAFFIC ISLAND. 1/ SAWCUT AT FRONT EDGE OF EXISTING GUTTER AND CONSTRUCT FULL OLI'fl1 PAVEMENT SECTION AS SHOWN. 10 01 A. 124 • /1 pier ).)) 10 STA 121.07 (40 LT) IILMOVE EXISTING CHAIN LINK TENCI, AS NECESSARY TO CONST SIDEWALK AND BICYCLE PATII. WATER ANDJANITARY SEWER ADJUSTMENT • SHEET 17 lO ADJUST EXISTING SANITARY SEWED MANIIOLE RING AND COVER TO GRADE. STA 176.21157•).1) STA. 121 • 67 (50 11) STA 121.70124'11) STA 127.67(2211) STORM DRAINAGE • SHEET 11 7.•• 3712 •1212!' RT. A0A 1160.CATC44$ASINr-/1BAN M DRAIN PIPE TO EXISTING CAT 125.43 (22 i1 _ 2_ SrJ1_ 12* .11 4S2.L74_l,ONSIRUOT TYEEJ.A710201EOF NEW 8' DIAMETER PLAS1cONCRETE 510RM N PIPE TO OUTFALL AT EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCH'S/A.124 •6115 T). RIPRAP PIPE OUTFALL WITH HANO•PLACED 771PRA I•• •DEEP A23 4 • - 3 - S2A: 1 125 =75(26• LT). A' ' 21511 • ANHOLE'RING AND COVER-TO- GRADE. 4 STA. 125 6 H • a ' A9B7CONNECT IN0 STORM DRAIN MANHOLE STA. 125.72 (2• WITH 48 LF OF ✓10' DIAMETER PLAIN CONCRETE STORM DRAIN PIPE. ABAN• c EXISTING 6 STORM DRAIN PIPE TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN STA. 125.00 (24.11 Q • ✓5 STA. ( '_ l2o.06 (70' RT). ABANDON EXISTING .• • AND 06 (2/' RT 0' DIETER Al ' TIV✓ 9 w . `Pa •( (/ % C'✓ (/),./) v ✓0 STA. 125.06 (2211T). REMOVE EXISTING CATCH BASIN. STORM DRAIN PIPE TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN STA. 125 • ' 4M o TiE-- ..7(S'- j < g 1 6. v7 STA. 125.00 (22' 112). CONSTRUCT NEW CATCII BASIN TYPE 2.16', ROTATE i4 T/, .4.61, # TOP SECTION AS REOUIREO TO POSITION 111710 AND COVER IN GUTTER (21' CONNECT PLAIN NC BASIN STA. 127 • IO (21' RT) WI 110 LF OF 72' 1 /J n _•. IZ' DIAMETER PWN CONCRETRET N E STORM pIPE. 1 ,( 2:1,., ✓6 U EXTEND EXISTING 6• DIA. AND 6 D. STORM DRAIN PIPES TO NEW CATCII .a V / ,/' c +0 C z io BASIN STA. 125.00 (22 RT) AS SHOWN. MAINTAIN EXISTING PIPE SLOPE. _ i' =STA -1 ... u 7. O NST'ER13' w6C7CfCFTBX TO RAOEAU • " ( INSTALL SOLID COY to _sIA..125..o6JA65 1 .o 0NSTADCTHEW 'CxTCN1iA51R`fvptTW'0V V 11 STA. 127.25 (20' RT). RAISE EXISTING CATCH BASIN TO GRADE AND INSTALL SOLID COVER. PLUG AND ABANDON 011 REMOVE EXISTING 12' STORM DRAIN PIPE TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN STA. 125.06 (24'11T). 12 STA. 127 • 10 (21' RT). CONSTRUCT NEW CATCII BASIN TYPE 2•10'. CONNECT TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN STA. 127 •25 (26' RT) WITH 11 LF OF 12' DIAMETER PLAIN CONCRETE STORM DRAIN PIPE. STA. 127.50 (23'80. ABANDON EXISTING CATCII BASIN. ABANDON EXISTING 12' STORM DRAIN PIPE TO EXISTING CATCII BASIN STA. 175. 96 (24' RT). EXISTING IZ' D METER STORM DRAM PIPE 125. 00(51 XISTINOIS• DIAMETER STORM'ORAIN PIPE. CONSTRUCT NE TCUZASIN TYPE 1. C071N' TO NEyW!.CAT BASIN STA. 125.06 (46 5' LT) WITI1 YE F 12 DIAMETE .. .DAM CONCRETE STORM DRAIN PIPE. Y1'- le-4i56 PL•v6 Ty /e- ms s•( 1-"cd Pcsp A-P OOry CF H6r>✓rc^' kj7SO ESE April 24, 1992 Mr. Mark" Cross Robert H. Lee and Associates 1.520 140th. Ave. N.E. Suite 200 Bellevue, Washington 98005 RE: EXAMPLE PHOTOGRAPHS - GROUNDWATER AND SOIL REMEDIATION SYSTEM PROPOSED FOR 13435 INTERURBAN SOUTH IN TUKWIL.A, WASHINGTON. Dear Mr. Cross: Enclosed please find the photographs you requested during our telephone conversation of this date. The soil venting and groundwater remediation system pictured is similar to the system proposed for 13435 Interurban Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington. Several differences will exist between the Tukwila system and the one depicted. • The concrete pad in Tukwila will be 20 feet by 20 feet rather than 20 by 25, as • Slats in the fencing will be matched to the station building facing and /or fencing. • A CILCORP Company shown. Environmental Science & Engineering, Inc. We understand that redwood slats will be appropriate. The gray oil /water separator and gray air compressor tank will not be utilized in Tukwila. They will be replaced with a smaller bag filter system, electric control box, and pvc piping from individual wells. The carbon canister shown may actually be replaced with several smaller canisters. No canisters larger than the one shown in the photograph are expected to be necessary. • Razor wire is not expected to be required in Tukwila. If necessary, the fenced enclosure may be roofed, with additional chain -link fencing and redwood slats. We have another active system in Seattle which is somewhat more similar to the proposed Tukwila system, but no photographs are currently available. Please ,contact me if you feel that '' pictures of that system might be more helpful. '' p Y g l;i3OI41.1L 17411 ■.E. Union Hill Road, Suite 220 • Redmond, WA 98052 ('hone (206) 869 -8220 Fax (206) 867 -1366 NAY .o L. 1992 CITY cal= ,TUKWILA PLARINUNG DEPT. .._,.... . Michael. Meyer Senior. Staff Geologist j : \projccls \92- 7IG2 \LI;f3i.Lis`r .. If : =I can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to call me at (206) 869 -8220. Sincerely, • : ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, INC. . SITE PLAN INTERURBAN AVE. S. SOUTH CENTER OIL 13435 INTERURBAN AVE. S. 11.969A. WASHINGTON NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION 000 moassuo.4. 44444,1 (PANT PC P W.) 00 RM. 1.1. 117, CONSIRUCT1ON 001.01.11.0 AS-BUILT DRAWN° 014064:RT H. LEI MISOCIA1111 .......................... A REVISOR 041419/199 =MD Mb OATE APINIOVCD ElEVATICHS PcRIIT SOUTH CENTER OIL BID 13435 INTERURBAN AVE. S. IUNVALA. WASHINGTON SCALL 1/4 .4 1-0 DAIL 03/17/9'... DR 0.w. at 0.J.W. ON. --- Z. • n3 9067.10 A- 4 O Entpr•n Tr.• Planting i4 Landscape Specillcatlons ...:.i.: M.....r...r........ we. .....i w• I •••• f••••• MwiW •. •• M. I Mare. 4w.lx 1C.. - ` " .x.. I r ' ~ Deciduous Tr. 011/31 . Planting lltlQ ` s n; Mele M•.ur .YMn •••••■• 11 • COR. 9.LD III.nrF YCS111. A.C. TRANSIT PARK & RIDE SIDEWALK EXXIIING LANDSCAPING 4 J••y de SWALE r f ( o D m ) o m ) o m ) INTERURBAN AVENUE Op oo1 'SIDEWALK ' PLANT LEGEND s<&) Y.I 1S IM...wii.".. �..r. lot/ r•••■••• wr gaols Y..YIr • rr o • . + to, TNASI actluulE MC/ 10NI1114[LW31h s•M1ll; ` 0 13•343.1 o...w.n r�.nu r�ar.. ^ . .. • w tn..tm /1 r............. rlrr.....r V w.... w+.. r.r...I. Irou.....•..... ..Y......•.•. tr.. W .slut tr.s. la Os '.• • ~... Agrik efeArAMMARVE T Ir If ANEW MEM= WINN 0 an as . • 0 0 0 O 1 GENERAL NOTE 1(1 1.C. 3-1 (00 6..:4n03 tRR. L N 1 t..r. /.o •a.../..w•M.r.Y..M ■• Yr.re w•wr.... N um motor. r�..wMw a r..r wr....MrwMr... /M..•m...w /11.1.10 /..r <21M •••••••• • Iw. • rY.w.w.MM4 r .M..a..• • ....r..• MA..w..••• rruMa/...w y " NORTH m 10313 Of WOWS 82I i amurn SG WA 1'.10'1 3.12 /a ` °1 L 1 Irrigation Specifications easueetuni f1 • d or m w.I r Wrote r vYb eel. wear* Imam sheen Vent! Ws on.. WN.w• wo-.ro4W el eye Ml Pro.. we* 12 one an. end 120 V AC peer bIa*fl . Prw.t. aa•l. Yom ave.,. to reared Owning r.. Emend 24 preen.) r... Ir team reds. c.P rd top A.C. TRANSIT PARK & RIDE SIX C OCD) a EU ) Irrigation Legend O L ..r ••••4471 Poo w••••••a Ca war •••wao s • .r.t Alb • .•.r ••••••n. m e r e General Notes 1) l r ream K..6 b Vona mac.. newt.,. re*. ervr, end re be", Se reale roes r Yen oar. rwp w e.... E ) Louden al Idea. mii.. levet w.M•Iry r• domed Vi. e end r men In pb I m o smq rem Yew em b matinee wen edm w r.. a dnlW• 11 I - - - - -- 1) IYbt b Inv*, SPSd1o..te lot.11erW l.OA.t^e•r �.! .� satraaaa.i 1,IY �e� rte— _ — 1.9., • 1' SIV. 1• I I' I' SeKWN • INTERURBAN AVENUE r9erY.cO.L _ • homage, — • 1r..w._. ........r.�.._�r. ` o t:r.• �■ err .�.w.r r /won I..rr....•r.r.••••r.a • ••••.•0..1•Nr w.nr.•rw.r.•rrrOuor. r r•••• ■••••■ w..•rr w�.� ��~ira.,wrwrr.•rrrr Awed.. e Veer el P.0 C.b mend Oa1 rrb dna 1 thence . V wear knees Oa 10 a eed, rooked V• r . .Mrueb P ed.rd..4nbe el PO C. pwberk Y>h'e•tr rwW..1/ Y M Wo.prKM•. y, ✓ Ire NM'S' ' CALL, r.1r W R.wal• Control VY1• o- ®ole c—•• t••w.•wr• ©Yre.r ben V.F. r �:..•...w.:e a ......... 'tr ru H «.. new.• - 1! freer, . woe Ott .yn Pear 1•••••••• navel. •µ n .wwP M... r (OF 411.1 Mo . 114 1 rzua etl nm4"" ;w7 . r 0. t•r/ rtd• Aw 7N •W • 4 4I.P,WI • MN,l tl eC11a, 1 few VM+1. ur_ SO I Y: 1 1'.10') 3.11.2 YU1 L 2 • ! j ::::111 •d1.•,1. • I • .„ • • 'DC1AIL 1 ULM CNIA LIA• • C. ANNAN( mon,. .011100/11•1711, 'aro • • DAMS 0.S. CI C.C.. 1717 C.11. ClIOCTO. SSSSS 1,../ C.W. 110.171 - C.1011/1 Cr NV IC - 111.10.1CM .01/JIT C.C. .041•1711 n SISCIPICaL 11117. C.a. COMMA WAITS 10 CI CAST ISM j , • 111= 14111110 V.O . c2.. 1 b N A,„•: A j • t . I • -- • TACS.. LIAO • • ';741 1.1.7e" " " """ " - AAA IlAg• • TUAN MAT 101 agAtall. NTA PVC 117 •/• SS . C . 1 . 11:11•117 SIM. 0011 PINT ...... V A C TRANSIT PARK &RIDE • „• ,• ..... .,„ ...,` .. , 1 2 ' -- .:0 I STORY C AISTING BUILDING, I CC AC (S. S. H. 2M ) DIRT • STAN • • 171.11.00/ nrs . Lg. T.C. IOW Or C1.1. 1 „ It • AC 11‘.' • - DIRT . 1 i k17: A I _ . . _ , TRAM. TAW TOP OP 1111.0 0 IMILIT1 • TOM • -- NILS NIA to..,.•• LY - • • - 2 - 13 4 5 (TANK RCMOVAL AREA) AC . I o• I - ;1 4 •■.° . , , ,, 201 73 . I ,'"' / .. / .• 77 ■ ... 1:r.' .7... le" S 99.14 19:C .,, .-- 4, - 4. '''; i / /....' ' DIRT ."1 / - -,.,‘ c . . ., ....ems ... ' l i 7. c .... tif:A ' .... .., 1-11•11Y,° - 'c . L I 14 .. 10. .... , t; • • 1... - " • , INTERURBAN j / AVENUE ••0 1 I -- • C MOOS CiaMINor - • . • -• 1 . 1 I Me:a 47040 /0.11.1011 SCIOCIIS /PT 1.07 ChM. NOS 111.4 14.104. 0.11 0001. PIM •11 ILIAD .1 ... .. MO. AS 1.1.11.. •10.0 N17 M... AI OM. NO mom. og LOCA1120 TVA 0.1.0. ye CIIIVOS msam • C0117.7.0 WINN 11.111/141.1. SISTAM111 tareatroo 47..V.:::■=i:j=at IT= btrt 01 11.1111/AL ..... SS Wag OA L., .170 Me 10. LAM, •171f 01 000111100 170,./1 COINS. SM. NAN .11 SITS LISS •■•• AS IMMO. DIMN .• .P Of ..... 1. INS SALLS •110 . CLIOCALT, 0AM 1SL• ANTI. 11.•1100 • SC II :OP or ... .. sookoo so Tag so ....... C1.1011 OF oiL SITMATVII 1. ILMATI. • 18.0 VIre mouto44.1 NOON. N WO "MN. NAM, N TAGON OMANI :::: CAN 1701111i TALL/1100.1 : POTTIN ..... la IRIST•• ATI. CLAIM OIS T. SCTION NMANT 11 .1711 NOMA MAT . .•.. P OLOCNSLO.111/4104i ....... YU/ aLOOS .1 CM ....... ANS •I.N1 STAYS FICTI . Pg. •114 MI MIS AIL.. MS Mg TIWS .11/7 1.1. 7 • •01 111/.. 13(71 .1.11 ..... • 110 UST 1111•10 ITN . 70 4111: TT. IVY. POI. OF 144.0104. taClti INT . TO ....... ITT DI TM. ..... 110.1 Mt. owl..., SL AIM TAIL•10 ..... LOLLS 11•00.116 ON f.11314/ CAUCA. slum CNN. T•AT TAIS NM, MAT N.A. /1117.111011 OA 1.1=11 gilTr00% . 4 11.BOIN TY/ TN. MS MI W.A... OF .111.111.11. 01107,11.11 ON. MI• WM OOP IMAM/ /11111.010. 011 11.0.1.111 Otr MIII MCMF AS SOMA, 3111$11 um " rix . '"" or_Ty•r " terotrari= to= ."••••■=, 711714.20117-111.111,11 1111. ...... NA CON11.01 MC011111. . NISTA ..1111711., N/1•11.0111 TIMM" INIIIIINCS CO.M1 USSIINTM, 10C./ •MT: 741 SO 0 1111.1 .16 " 1111101 . • 111 . :11,11:141111 . 1 . .gaTS0 11710111.11 AFTM .1S MT& ASS 1101 Gli 0 >- z Wu < E 2 le - 0 rj E 3 2 Z A LIJ 4 U 2 I 0 ff, o 3 (/) N JJ M 1 1-2902 • 02002 00 1 z O O 4 O INTERURBAN AVE. S. MAMMA ROAD 70M PERMIT BID O ................. CONSTRUCTION sot ow 414 4401.. AS -BOLT DRAVANO Q L ". 11. lli a A3$OOAnS 9111906 DATL A X010 WIADMLO PLAN SOUTH CENTER OIL 13405 INTERURBAN At 5. TUNMIA, WASIDNC1011 MALI - 10' -0 DAIL 3/10/97 DL CDR. CH D.J.W. APP. N.ES. 55/ AID) 9067.10 G -1 • SIGN ELEVATION rrt. IOW OW .SA.' Still S0OW- 4. r W. CAI • Q �SI +F NUM WI ?Wri1D SD.. W ..�"DY IV uo 50tb SY.S Dais •+. =Ywi ua ro rat' a.T WA W rt [ 1 -QY ai Dii ro ra tMOw.nplR tD S 1S tS. W T.u'O -N ruu wAs a LI OF QOM 1 H. MAIL QDM S •. WI TRt 4 SO t (fttD SNU ,a W. SWAMIS rU WYO.= 4. 10 n a..n [00•00. - xi�•�atr I w.utrt I cow•rotnl — _41 I 'Ir 0 ==:-%-====g _=___,==dt = = == r r - .- , i' MAIW1Ot 104104 P0/0 PERMIT BID rr CONSTR .rt..oaD ro f+ vM F OAT[ AM1014b ELEVA11ON: CEDAR TRASH ENCLOSURE • ELEVATION: CEDAR TRASH ENCLOSURE SOUTH CENTER OIL 13435 0 UR 11ERBAII AVE. S. RC1�DR 10(1110. WAS1111101011 UCTION Iwo T 50.0 5041/2 Al -0 A � - " " ' ` — . — p1 D.J.W. Ol D.J.W. APP. I.C.S. I AS-E1U LT DRANINO 11Ottl1T M. LI(r ASSOCIATE% -- -- 19 71 .I.A :6.. .'Y S..bG'1...:: p1) 9067.10 A -5 • DAID 03/20/E rc - xF " c x.c outh Center O& Inc. D•• PACIFIC PRIDE-- -_. ... --r SUPER 0.00 UNLEADED 0.00 o REGULAR 0.00t DIESEL 0.00 0 SIGN ELEVATION rrt. IOW OW .SA.' Still S0OW- 4. r W. CAI • Q �SI +F NUM WI ?Wri1D SD.. W ..�"DY IV uo 50tb SY.S Dais •+. =Ywi ua ro rat' a.T WA W rt [ 1 -QY ai Dii ro ra tMOw.nplR tD S 1S tS. W T.u'O -N ruu wAs a LI OF QOM 1 H. MAIL QDM S •. WI TRt 4 SO t (fttD SNU ,a W. SWAMIS rU WYO.= 4. 10 n a..n [00•00. - xi�•�atr I w.utrt I cow•rotnl — _41 I 'Ir 0 ==:-%-====g _=___,==dt = = == r r - .- , i' MAIW1Ot 104104 P0/0 PERMIT BID rr CONSTR .rt..oaD ro f+ vM F OAT[ AM1014b ELEVA11ON: CEDAR TRASH ENCLOSURE • ELEVATION: CEDAR TRASH ENCLOSURE SOUTH CENTER OIL 13435 0 UR 11ERBAII AVE. S. RC1�DR 10(1110. WAS1111101011 UCTION Iwo T 50.0 5041/2 Al -0 A � - " " ' ` — . — p1 D.J.W. Ol D.J.W. APP. I.C.S. I AS-E1U LT DRANINO 11Ottl1T M. LI(r ASSOCIATE% -- -- 19 71 .I.A :6.. .'Y S..bG'1...:: p1) 9067.10 A -5 • DAID 03/20/E TEYAGO 31T6 f ee • z7- 3901 z64. Tur4uic.► 02n. /392 _ L . ' • 7 E cr I 304 .ate tr.t• z q owQ /5o9 S tN • • \ Z 0 4 ►. fl 14. ° °O .D.c . 4p-of -05 �✓ hu 920.15 44 26 Zifr c ret Spa 0 32 ►. 4'9,0 0 D0 0 29 (( O * O- 4 O 10 g OZjo , J (i 7999 N 88 2619: SW 14 - 23 - 4 -4pprove.; 5 !G /6B sAA 4 'Transportation and Traffic Engineering PtANNING•DESIGN March 12, 1992 Mr. Jim Thorpe, President South Center Oil 730 S Central Kent, WA 98032 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TUKWILA CARD LOCK FUELING FACILITY Project Description Trip Generation Trip Generation for a Card Lock Facility Transpo Group TG: 92203.00 Dear Mr. Thorpe: This letter summarizes the traffic impact analysis prepared for the proposed card lock fueling facility on Interurban Avenue in Tukwila, Washington. The purpose of this analysis is to iden- tify potential transportation - related impacts associated with development of the proposed pro- ject and to identify measures that may be required to mitigate the project impacts. The proposed card lock fueling facility would be located on the west side of Interurban Avenue S just south of I -5 (at 13435 Interurban Avenue S). Card lock facilities serve only subscribers of the card lock service and do not serve the general public like a service station. The proposed facility would have eight (8) fuel dispensers (pumps). The site was previously occupied by a gas station /card lock facility/convenience market. The gas station had five fuel pumps, and the convenience market was approximately 2,380 square feet (sf). Trip generation for the project was determined as the net increase between the proposed card lock facility and the trip generation from the gas station /card lock facility/convenience market that previously occupied the site. The trip generation values for these uses are defined below. Trip generation for a new development is usually determined from rates and equations pro- vided in Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), 5th Edition. The trip generation rates and equations are relationships between a known characteristic of the development (i.e., square footage, number of employees, number of fuel pumps, etc.) and the number of trips generated by the development. These relationships are determined from vehicle trip surveys conducted at particular developments. Currently, no data is pro- vided for card lock facilities in the trip generation manual. To determine trip generation rates for this type of facility, customer transaction data at an existing facility were collected. Since each customer transaction corresponds to two vehicle trips (1 in, 1 out), trip generation can be estimated from the data. The following data were collected from the existing card lock fueling facility at 730 S Central in Kent, Washington: The TRANSPO Group. Inc. 14335 N.E. 24th Street. Suite 201 Bellevue. Washington 98007 FAX 206, 7:7.3688 206/641-3881 Mr. Jim Thorpe, President March 12, 1992 Page 2 • .Number of transactions per month for eight months from January 1991 to August 1991 (the Kent facility was closed for construction from mid- September 1991 to mid -January 1992). • Total number of transactions per day for five consecutive days (Monday. February 3, 1992, through Friday, February 7. 1992). • Detail of transactions that occurred during the PM peak period between 3:00 and 6:00 p.m. for the five consecutive days in February. This information included the date and time of the transaction and the type and amount of fuel purchased. To determine the PM peak hour and the corresponding number of vehicle trips for the Kent facility, the transaction times were grouped into 15- minute periods. The number of trans- actions for each 15- minute block was averaged over the 5 -day period. The peak hour was determined to be from 3:45 to 4:45 p.m.. and the peak hour trips were 24 (12 in, 12 out). The daily trip generation was determined from averaging the total daily transactions over the 5 -day period in February. The average number of transactions was 177, which rep- resents 354 daily trips. The percentage of trucks using the facility was also determined. Since card lock fueling facilities are one of the few types of service stations that provide high quality diesel fuel, there would likely be a greater than average number of trucks using this type of facillty. The number of trucks at the Kent facility was based on the number of transactions involv- ing the purchase of diesel fuel. Only a small percentage of the diesel fuel purchases were for less than 20 gallons. Therefore, all diesel fuel transactions were assumed to be large trucks (semi - tractor trailer). Over the 5 -day period in February, approximately 14 percent of the PM peak hour vehicle trips were trucks. The daily and PM peak hour trips were adjusted to reflect monthly fluctuations in trips. According to the breakdown of the monthly transactions, the lowest number of transactions occurred in February (1,239 transactions). and the greatest number of transactions occurred in August (1,584 transactions). The average number of transactions was 1,400 per month. The transactions for February were adjusted to an average month using a multiplier of 1.13 (1.400/1,239). This multiplier was used to adjust the daily and PM peak hour trips. In general, trip generation rates for a service station are based on the number of gasoline pumps. There are 12 pumps at the Kent Card Lock Facility. To determine the trip genera- tion rates for this facility, the adjusted daily and peak hour vehicle trips were divided by the number of service pumps. The trip generation rates for a card lock facility are shown in Table 1; complete trip data for the Kent facility are attached. Table 1. Average Trip Generation Rates for Card Lock Facility - Trips per Pump The Tmnspo Group PM Peak Hour Trip Rate PM Peak Hour Truck Trip Rate Daily Trip Rate In Out Total In Out Total Trips per Facility 400 14 14 28 2 2 4 Trips per Pump 33.33 1.11 1.11 2.22 0.17 0.17 0.34 Mr. Jim Thorpe, President March 12, 1992 Page 3 Proposed Project Trip Generation The Transpo Group The proposed project would be located on the site of an existing service station /card lock facility/convenience market. The net increase in project traffic was, therefore, determined as the difference between the proposed and existing trip generation. The existing site trip generation is based on average trip equations for service stations with convenience markets in Trip Generation (ITE, 5th Edition, 1991). These equations are based on the size of the con- venience market (2,380 si). The proposed site trip generation was estimated using trip data for a card lock facility summarized above. In order to evaluate the worst -case condition, the number of trips per facility rather than per pump was used for the proposed project. The net change in project - generated traffic is summarized in Table 2. Table 2. Project Trip Generation Land Use Net Change in Driveway Trips Site Access PM Peak Hour Daily In Out Total A. Driveway Trips Proposed Card Lock Facility 400 14 14 28 with 8 Gas Purnps Existing Service Station/Gard Lock Facility/ Convenience Market 1 96 98 98 196 -1,560 44 -84 -168 1 Trip generation rates based on survey of existing cans lock facility in Kent, Washington. 2 Peak hour trips based on rates per Trip Generation 5th Edition, 1991, for service stations with convenience market (land use code 845). Daily trips based on k- factor for convenience markets (10 percent). As shown above, the proposed facillty would generate approximately 400 trips per day and 28 trips during the PM peak hour — significantly less traffic than the previous use. Of these, it is estimated that there would be 56 truck trips per day and 4 truck trips during the PM peak hour. Because the site would generate less traffic than the previous use, no off -site analysis was performed for this project. The proposed project would have two driveways on Interurban Avenue S, as shown on Figure 1. The northernmost driveway would be approximately 125 feet south of the driveway to the Metro Park -n -Ride lot and the on -ramp to northbound I -5. Interurban Avenue S is currently under construction. A center, channelization island would be located approximately 60 feet south of the northernmost site driveway and would restrict large vehicles from turning left from the site. Therefore, it is recommended that a one -way circulation pattern be instituted for the site with the southernmost driveway designated as "entrance only" and the northernmost driveway des- Mr. Jim Thorpe. President March 12, 1992 Page 4 ignated as "exit only." Because of the low volume of traffic generated by the site, there should be minimal conflict between left turning vehicles entering the site and left turning vehicles exit- ing the site. Entering left turns would not conflict with the center median. The one -way circulation pattern would improve traffic operations on and oil -site because of the following: • Reduced conflicts between vehicles exiting the Metro Park -n -Ride lot and vehi- cles exiting the card lock facility since all traffic exiting the site would use the southernmost driveway. • Increased weaving distance between the site and the on -ramp to northbound I -5. • Increased entering and exiting lane width of driveways for turning maneuvers. • Reduced on -site conflicts caused by two - direction traffic. Summary The proposed Tukwila Card Lock Facility on Interurban Avenue S would generate a total of 400 daily trips and 28 PM peak hour trips. This is significantly less than the number of trips generated by the service station /card lock /convenience market that previously occupied the site. Therefore, no off -site mitigation would be needed to accommodate this project. It is recommended that a one -way, counterclockwise circulation pattern be establlshed for the site. The northernmost driveway should be designated entrance only, and the south- ernmost driveway should be designated exit only. The circulation pattern would improve on and oil -site traffic operations. Please call me if you have any questions or comments regarding this analysis. Very truly yours, The TRANSPO Group, Inc. -ma J I C'• 7crt� Marna C. Heffron. P.E. Transportation Engineer MCH /mlm Attachments cc: Mr. Mark Cross, Robert H. Lee & Associates VACH 92200LR1 The Transpo Group NB RAMP TO 1.5 SCHEMATIC DRAWING ONLY APPROXIMATE SCALE, I' = 40' TUKWILA CARD LOCK FACILITY MID OM* rall.• ONO IMMIO 41110. Suggested Circulation Pattern Figure 1 PROJECT SITE Site Plan and Interurban Avenue S Plan INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH c ) c ) t ) A N' • • Transpo Group 92 203.00 3111/92 • i r • TRIP GENERATION DATA • mouth Center Oil, Inc. February 23, 1992 Trip Generation Rates Number of transactions by month from January 1991 1,416 April 1991 1,358 July 1991 1,485 October 1991 Under Const. January 1992 592 (Re- opened February 3', 1992 February 4, 1992 February 5, 1992 February 6, 1992 February 7, 1992 Information attached (206) 852 -2777 1- 800 -950 -3835 FAX (206) 854 -7936 Cardlock Fuel Stops • February 1991 1,239 May 1991 1,421 August 1991 1,584 November 1991 Under Const. mid- month) Total Number of transactions 175 166 174 187 183 730 South Central P.O. Box 38 Kent, WA 98035 Gasoline • Diesel • Lubricants by day for March 1991 1,314 June 1991 1,391 December 1991 Under Const. PACIFIC PRIDE INDEPENDENT FRANCHISEE January 1991 thru January 1992 September 1991 324 (Under Const.) five consecutive days Detail of transactions for peak hours 3:OOpm thru 6:OOpm for five consecutive days. MONDAY 2/3/92 TUESDAY 2/4192 WEDNESDAY 2/5/92 THURSDAY 2092 FRIDAY 2/7/92 WEEK AVERAGE Vehldes Trucks 0 % Time Vehldes Trucks N % Vehldes Trucks 0 % Vehldes Trucks 0 9b Vehldes Trucks 1 % Vehldes Trucks 1 9'0 15 :00 2 1 4 3 2 2 1 1 g ggge g g g g e gg g ;:gfAigasi N.1.0,4540: g 15 :15 1 7 1 5 2 1 6 1 15 :30 2 0 3 1 3 2 15 :45 2 4 4 1 2 3 16:00 4 4 3 2 6 3 1 16:16 2 2 4 2 2 3 16 :30 0 1 3 6 6 16 :45 6 2 2 1 1 2 1 17:00 5 1 3 3 2 17:15 3 6 1 1 4 0 17:30 0 1 1 1 1 2 17:45 2 2 2 1 3 2 TOTAL 29 3 109E 34 8 24% 31 9 29% 29 5 17% 29 4 14% TRIP GENERATION DATA CARD LOCK FUELING FACILITY • KENT, WASHINGTON TRIP GENERATION FOR CARD LOCK FACILITY 703 S. Central, Kent, Washington Daily PM Peak Hour Trucks In Out Total in Out Total 354 12 12 24 2 2 4 Note : There are 12 pumps at the Kent Card Lock Fadlity AVERAGE MONTH TRIP GENERATION (Adjusted using 1.13 mutlplier) Daily PM Peak Hour Trucks In Out Total In Out Total 400 13 13 27 2 2 4 TRIPGEN.XLS • 3/6/92 AVERAGE TRIP RATES FOR CARD LOCK FACILITY (per pump) Dally PM Peak Hour Trucks In Out Total In Out Total 33.33 1.11 1.11 2.22 0.17 0.17 0.34 4. Date checklist prepared: 3/27/92 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Control No. G= 'Epic File No. Fee 44 -OO. a Receipt No. * 22S .vo A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: South Center Oil Card -lock Facility 2. Name of applicant: Mr. Jim Thorp, President, South Center Oil- 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: South (:PntPr Oil, 730 South Central Ave., Kent, WA 98032 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Project could begin in August depending on review timing. Retail Kiosk may be constructed as a second phase. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The applicant has designed a project that can operate without an attendant. However the applicant does want to have the flexability to have an attendant and operate more as a retail facility. The retail kiosk and bathroom are shown on the plan. If phasing of the project is not allo' the applicant would like to build the entire project at once. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your roposal. Design Review, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, building permit, grading permit, Air Quality permit. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page.. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. The proposed project is to build an eight position fueling facility that is capable of retail sales from the I12 sq. ft. kiosk and bathroom and is equip d T allow commercial customersto access tuel without an attendant. This is known as a Card Lock Facility. IFE facility would be open 24 hrs a day. However any potential retail sales from the Kiosk would be limited to the early evening hours. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location.of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. The project address is 13435 Interurban Ave. This is located in the NW Quarter of Section 14 Township 23 range 4 Last. the site is bounded three sides a Metro Park and Ride Lot. Site was previously occupied by a Texaco ret4i1 food . and fuel sales facility. That entire facility is in the process of being removed and the site remediated. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? The site is in the Interlake Design District. Property is zoned C -2. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Site is relatively flat but slopes to the west. Low retaining walls surround site on Park and ride lot.. b. What is the steepest slope on the site ( approximate percent slope)? 2% grade c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Unknown. No known prime farmland. Site was Texaco Station d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. no e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 1,000 cubic yards. Some filling is related to tanks and some to slope lot for grss lined Swale. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. limited potential due to flat condition. Minimum amount of erosion could occurr. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 78 % the rest is landscaping. (22 %) Evaluation for Agency Use Only ' 2. Air 3. Water a. Surface: h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Hay bales around ctnrm drainage system. Temporary Erosion Control Plan to he reviewed by City. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some dust will be generated during construction. Some fuel vapors will be generated by filling vehicles. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Frosion and dust control durrinq construction. Advanced Phase two vapor recovery equipment will he installed to minimize fuel vapors leaving site. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Duwamish or Green River is located approximately 150 feet to the east. Evaluation for Agency Use Only. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. Project will include work 150 to 200 feet from river edge. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would' be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 1,000 Cubic yds. Material will come from off site. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. Storm water from onsite will be routed through grass lined swale and oil water separator befor release to existing storm drain in south west corner of site. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. Elevations of site existing and proposed are shown. Survey shows existing grades and grade sheet shows future grades. Road work by City on Interurban is raising grades along east property line. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Sorm drainage will be treated • by use of oil /water separator and grass lined swale. Drainage from under canopy will go to separate oil /water separator and then to sanitary sewer. Evaluation for Agency Use Only. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground. water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. There are two separate storm drainage systems proposed. The runoff from the driveslab under the canopy will be routed through an oil water separator and then to the sanitary sewer. The storm drainage from the rest of the site will be routed through a grass lined swale and an oil /water . separator and then to existing storm drain. This system goes eventually to the Green River. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground; and runoff water impacts, if any: _ Sorm water from under canopy goes to separate oil /water separator and then to sanitary sewer. Paved surfaces will be treated by flowing through grass lined swale and oil /water separator. 4. Plants 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. the combination of grass lined swale and oil /water separator is designed to minimize waste release. Advanced double wall fuel tanks and spill monitoring equipment will minimize possibility of spill to ground water. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X • shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other — other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some shrubs located in existing planting areas would be removed. Proposed plan includes extensive new plantings along with grass areas for water quality purposes. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Evaluation for Agency Use Only 5. Animals d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other _ measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Landscaping will cover 22% of site. See attached landscape plan. This is an increaseefrom the approximate 1b% landscaping under the previous use. a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: songbirds mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: none none b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No site has been in commercial use for a number o ey ars. interurban Ave. cuts this site from actual river trontage. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:Increase landscaping and grassy areas. Add trees see attached landscape plan. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical energy will be used to pump fuel and provide task and area lighting. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy 'by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or 'control energy impacts, if any: Use energy efficient light fixtures. Heat bathroom to 50 degrees only. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. This proposal includes two 22,000 gallon fuel storage tanks..These tanks will be devided into three or four product compartments. Tanks and all piping will be double wall construction. Only phase two vapor recovery lines are single wall. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Fire Department, Ambulance. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: Use double wall construction. include spill detection and alarms. Emergency power shut off box. Phase two vapor re covery system. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? There is a lot of background traffic noise from interurban Ave. and I -5. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by .or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. There will be some vehicular noise as vehicles enter and exit and start engines after fueling. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Card -lock facility has fewer vehicles coming and going than the previous service station. No food sales on site. Therefor, noise from site should be reduced compare previous use. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site use is a vacant service station that is in the process of demolition including the old tanks and equipment. Surrounding use is Park and Ride lot. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No the previous use was a commercial fueling facility and mini -mart. c. Describe any structures on the site. Empty service station building and canopy. Tanks have been removed. Evaluation for Agency Use Only.. d. 14ill any structures be demolished? If so, what? All existing structures are o be removed. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C-2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? According to Figure.3.7 on rage 1 16 of ShnrPline plan, nur site is in the "High Impact zone ". h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 1 or 2 part -time. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce. displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: landscaping perimeter areas. See site plan fnr details. Propose full irrigation system to maintain landscaping Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? none b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income "housing. none c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: none 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest structure is the canopy at 20 feet -6 in. The pole sign is proposed at 20 feet. Fxterinr building material for the canopy and retail kiosk is steel. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. New facility will have underground power and phone lines. The canopy is at nr below previous canopy height. Evaluation for Agency Use Only c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: We are proposing gown as a dominate color. See bld. elevations. All lighting will be screened from adjacent properties. All new landscape plan including more landscaping than previous use and new tree and shrub plantings. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? comp glare from lighting under canopy. Canopy will obsrur this_ lighting under canopy is important for safe fueling of vehicles. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Shield all light fixtures to stay on site. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? New pedestrian sidewalk along Interurban. Golf Course to the south and east. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Coordinate driveway design and location with City. Cnmmitt to north driveway as entrance only and the - s nth driveway as exit only for better circulation - and less conflict with pedestrians. -14- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Name_ PS c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: . Hone 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. This cite is served by Interurban Ave. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? one parking snare in addition to eight fueling positions. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No we have coordinated on driveways and frontage improvements with the City Interurban Ave. project. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. none in immediate vicinity. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Traffic study by Transpo shows 400 ADT. see attached study. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Make the north driveway "entrance only" and the southern "exit only ". 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Should be lower than mini - mart that previously occupied the site. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Fuel sales using_commercial credit cards instead of cash should reduce potential for crime Well lighted fueling area deters crime. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The City of Tukwila would provide water and sewer service. Puget Power would proves e lectrical power. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: `3 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. Evaluation for • Agency Use Only i TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIL T E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? Objective is to provide safe covered fueling for a wide range of vehicles. It is also a project objective to be able to operate without an attendant with automated fuel sales and record keeping. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? There are none. Using new double wall tanks with electonic spill detection and computer record keeping is most advanced way of fueling vehicles. Alternate to new facility is that older facilities provide service with 'older tanks and detection equipment. Also new phase two vapor control is more effective. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: With the inherent concern with fuel storage and fueling vehicles, it is important that new facilities like this card-lock are used rather than keeping alder facilities, Double wall tanks and piping combined with new leak detectors make the new fueling facilities much safer than old. Evaluation for Agency Use Only .‘e" wz �::tr :. uu•. +awn•mrts,..n..w+.uu.nw.. Sze._ t....«- w..�. »,..._...,.._.._�_. ___._._......... 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Pla ? No. lisp is cnnsistPnt with plan. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Lanrlsraping the perimeter Ar landsraring along Interurhan Grass liner) cwales to increase water quality of storm water Oil /water separators fnr stormwrainage system -23- Evaluation for • Agency Use Only 5oUThc ol� ��k� WroCuRBAK s File Number: Status: Applied: Approved: Expiration: Shoreline Management Act of 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT L92 -0029 APPROVED 03/30/1992 09/01/1992 Pursuant to RCW 90.58, a permit is hereby granted to: MARK CROSS to undertake the following development: CARD LOCK FUELING FACILITY, RETAILING OPTION upon the following property: Address: 13435 INTERURBAN AV S Parcel No: 000300 -0028 Sec /Twn /Rnge: NW 14 -23 -4E THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL BE WITHIN THE AREA OF THE GREEN RIVER AND ITS ASSOCIATED WETLANDS, WHICH IS A SHORELINE OF STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE AND IS DESIGNATED AS AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT. The following master program provisions are applicable to this development: URBAN Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 an nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other Federal, State or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act(Chapter 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the terms or conditions hereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) AND WAC 173 -14 -090, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE EXCEPT AS PROV- 1- 137-I RCW 90.58.140(5) (a) (b) (c) . f Director; Planning Department Date: Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within two years from date of issuance, per WAC 173 -14 -060. % CITY OF TUKWILA Id: ROUT130 Keyword: @ACTM User: 1685 09/01/92 Activity document routing maintenance. Permit No: L92 -0029 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT Route: 1 Current Route Line: 9 of 9 Packet Units Description Station Status Received Assigned Complete aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Packet Units Action Station Initials Status Received Assigned Completed PLAN 00 00 E ADMIN END Approved 09/01/92 09/01/92 09/01/92 Priority (0 /low..9 /high): 0 Regular hours (HH.MM): .00 Overtime Hours(HH.MM): Comments 1 SEPT. 1992 FOR FILE CLOSE -OUT. DNS WAS ISSUED ON ] 2[5/14/92. SHORELINES COMMENTS WERE ADDRESSED IN SEPA; COPIES] 3[OF COMMENTS INCLUDED IN SHORELINES FILE. ] 4[ ] 5[ ] 6[ ] 7 [ ] 8 [ ] 9[ ] 10[ ] aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaadaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa hat 1.1 041 • SITE PLAN pa.=•1.2=at.=.=—• 00' "41itZt,"tr ' UNSIMOCI 05-5. 5 17 5. 1. P•11 0.7•• IMMOCal CONV.1.1. .0 IV SuP Slst• Ca.1c1 1.71.4 ••••0.. IV. NU WPM.% 7.0 1. NI, WI I WO,PL - •—• 0 - 1453F15015 1111 1 •••• •• .4 PV•15.11? ;CAI E. 1 100 UI141C0l 1. 7---4 . 14,01■47 VP. 0 'r 1 —1.• (I Pit) 11, Su•VoAl PIPPM l•••010 I o 05- 0 I Ir Pent 1•111- — 1/ 151) f; 5045 IS,. Pr• - IPA. GUM .11 (1119 more.. 551 .145(1155 1 • — gity *45110 0411 0••••410P.OP.• cLooma coeso.L. -••••-*- win wsPoorc D •• ...••••••• s 05 • • r 4405511150515 1r .94 •10.. 4.11 Kt•••• caw. moo et. WO. 1E•_• ---- ----- - ---• — C.C. P.P. Few .00PC.... Lutt"POW4 Po t _ INTERURBAN AVE. S. • .04114 ■•••.. Pd.*• Pot• IP 1. 1 5. 105154? - kW% twit. LO. Site INIAPINC41 ligXD r OAIT A/P*0WD STE PLAN , t. • 1;7.. qPI VI( !HWY MAP GENERAL NOTE: :az nt• $1, 1.00.41111 Marl .0.01 • ptKrun G i iI NORTH PERLL1T SOUTH CENTER OIL END 13435 INTERURBAN AVE. 5. • TUKWILA. WASHINGTON ..... ... ebtieficucnoti 4111900 sokr, 1 • l0-Cr 0410 02/13/92 551. 0.5.35. 01. O.J.W. IN. H.E.S. A5-BULT °RAKING _ 12 -.1 MOWRY H. lig • A•RoC4Allt• A •— A-1 ss Mr...." ."4 -- • " ' - /vs uofii.to • 5.4 F.K ••00..- . p.m r■one webr ow. too. . . 0.1 •LUIC 1 Utril OW Pit. Mel .0•M- 0.1 1.4.11t Y. AUX. 0 ■104 1.0k* P... NORTH ELEVATION 11 EAST ELEVATION 000 - )•••••11111•4. OP./ (*.I PAC- MO( 11.0.1) 0 11 rtff aft •." 1V1 VW. fa kr. OKAYING* IMOD /0112 DAT P POW rot PERMIT BID CONSTRUCTION so • 1014 AS—I3ULT DRAMINO a Amoy A. LIZ a ASSOC/CIES ............... SOUTH CENTER OIL SS/ • AIM 9067.10 A-4 ELF/AMENS I3435 INIERURBAll AVE. S. IUKNILA. WASHINGIEVI ,CALL 1/4 a 1 DAR: 03/17/97 'andscape Specifications .�.wr..n..r .. .74. w. .. iw. w ti CC N � N ..... .. .............r : .•...: . . w.. ... I. ••••• .• n 1 W • * , �_ .. _ .. WIG.µ. U 4 Ta E proon 7r.. Planting 1 O ti j �' h•G. •XY Mate 1.•.rn41. � .��.�I ��➢fir •4 1.1 0 Mutt Plant ng O D•cIdu°u$ Tra■ Planting EX LANDSCAPING w r N SWALE 1 t + + GYp OW Y . fWl. 1• . 4Nr.K Verb AMINO ••tl•u A.C. TRANSIT PARK & RIDE r SIDEWALK ( ❑ o CO ) o CI ❑o o INTERURBAN AVENUE 1 J PLANT LEGEND LULL 1013301.13339.31t939 ---933/33•339.379 Yellnu ▪ ■• Oar .. •....•.. M. u.••r•n 1...". 1a.Y•, ▪ i + w mu u...., ;.: 1- --“". w r+1 • ^••• ••••w. 3.3•••• n•v..u...,13,3 El � = r .. n.r••■ . w q �/� n Y T.� Y �� Y�. if 7 `O�/� 7 'SIDEWALK' MIIIV w GENERAL NOTE. L1 5 411 1 -1 103 .C3.0. S.113. Landfeab. Nat.a• a ..,... w. 1•03wm.w...wr..,w.c.n.,ww 3 • .s:.�.. •w:••3• ••••• h.w Tr.w..... w,.w..w... f 1••••• T•.. ..Y woo M..•,.•,....•.v.s. Not 0 11r IIP SCAM 1• -I0' •1w11 d In • f•)•••• 42).• SO 1 Y.W 1•.117 1 1.17 N '"" L 1 Irrigation Specifications flebiebeie s.• ' .rrr•r.r.• rT 2222... >f• cafrolic to In bA.q on .Wt. .•1b Wo.,S. bonbon Wow. V.nlf wM Wd•1410. WY nunt mono...W h• Poi Pro.•. .w W 13 Wry auq oaf 120 V A C pow.. .combo m•mbo Prow. r cmlw lone m*.l.r b,w..S psnwp W. Eno 24•1b plW.•q ••.. 1 1• Wow p.., MV owl Pop Txn. •' I' P ▪ 1fLeed021 • y _•:r_..�r 1_1:17. ` ti "...`.r�"T�"Wr.wwr•..r.v.�wr• A.C. TRANSIT PARK & RIDE WYWALK aw.r411rrswlR- D UJ ) O Oo OOl, _J INTERURBAN AVENUE •••■■■••••••••••••■••• w .mega..(•••,nwr.•rr,r.r••r.•rr•. • ••■•■••.•••••■ w aoele • IS rm. 22, r�• y+••ib Irrigation Legend OD s..r wrr.un B moo... ,r.r, KM, •.rrr..+ lb.. n. n , .l r.• - wowo orr.r PK Po IA sow. too. aa- -1.00 brew/It lee am --- General Note 1.) Adpo Imp Nods lo wood....Imo m.oi.. WNn••m onosom ..d.. lamp. EOM Poole S•d, r torn cuM, p•A^p w... 2) Poirot b YryNon Wall, YWY.. ord d b * W..d,N.% �. d u. woo MY b la fl M p t wow. Woo rW. m., .W2 b mpn.n..w SPY, M W d•ns• o Wd j 11 y�• A P 1. - fy IYn �n 1 s` a1 Iri n - -�- -� r • S) I.M b 1.ya•n Sp.aSa o . b.d1bel Wy WrwY. _ _a ■ SIDEWALK z • Appro al locomen P.0C baa.d a.nba .o.. Owen on d,. **Ones Wory sod Orin." sI M Moped 1'O C. p CaN N . .on W W 1 h In.ngrb of Ww Ponio c.o. nf• N �Ir MMUr 2. *GALL i'.IV • 11 WI' JJ�211 Ow o.1 of CoW .f•„•ws. M - X`S•Vate n) O^.bo .1 ls Con1. Vol., 66 )a .N1. •■a. 411f 111^ tp 0 1.wJ O.. Vd. %LY4S ".—•u glam - .. rt. inwr •IOW r Prow n. rt.n Wn.• �IW.w1.M nbw r y 1w MN�••.•WIa - womb os n. Y MU o V-11.7‘.'""'" •r1.t.... Iwo a laws rtN•"2WI nPW11..nwi+1OPA 1 s .M,P11 rows .n { P.A., rule. 1 O 4 z } N S ; H 4 N ■ K W J • f ( - ) --1 W ; P -1-1 a w Z a IA O n S w o 2 N 1.1.•• 66 �•Wr WAW Wn, P.112 1.12.*2 "" L 2 \ 1.. Caa. C. 006.0.1 Nona. C. CODO.Atin • m. Ay. MOS c• (P.m Yr. - • - LI. COY s.110 SSSSS CAt. C.•. Col.rfr CO00.1.Ctf Of •Ille - occrfticos. C.C. CYCICII CVMS 0 01.000. ttttt C.O. co•CInt CI CACI ICY SYRIA ..-' ....; f." -. . .. s" 1:::111 \Ss s s ,. • ,.'''. , ' ' . C\•••• -- ., ,. ,...q.'i'4.'11" \i s • . . 's....;+ ';... ...,. ., ......., • .." 48,4 . 19 - Vio . tttttt •0 wt. I00 ,80.611 0.10.0 0. IA MO ' 4: tttt t • • /WA Lt. CAA.. • Ammo MET • o• ttttt AC I RA VISI I PARK 6 RI DE • fa, 00010 Mt• L.- tt • c I 1 1 " • , •.• .1 • STIce yORYI .1.1.1•••• TC • - • • TILY103011 COMM •• •.. TY. Tars tun T.C. ADA or Cla. TRAY.. VAULT TEA AI 0 WI.. AY.. • ATI&I. 00 t::.. (S. S. H. 2 M .., ,..- / ..... -• .... 7 .3 0 . i . si .". .-.6 ••••••'. A0-__ I. .... .•••• .....• , - ...,. 2 • :• '.. 1 1.! . •• ..,0 • 22 3 43 ‘. . 1.E..... I _ . ';',.:4'." - - ' -• - :get. a.m. ICy•OaClay Vattt 1.11 ttttt rOOT 1104. NET Yoe Ye CYO luy. :101am TWAT% •:7.c Ala 10 root ...E. 1.0. S COOT MC 1 :011 TID M077.1 110 AMON ttttt C. ttttttt 0 10,10.0. AVIMA 1 10..10 ImArDI 4.0 0.1. AC AC . 1 - I . -- - - :"11 ` - t : -11 SICK C.1.161. aili.. M•MS 0.0 0 • a b 0... . ,Tt,./s , -,.." ........... 1..... Ca AY.. lay NW.. o... - ..... lir 0 1...• yalla lowss. 10 /Yawn Abram . Tly 1: i / 4 ,... ( ".., tttttttttttttt - .8.. L 1 500140 E X1511110 M . •.....,.....”- - --.---. 1 . . , :::"..• ::••::=AIlaro• esnolro :::LITIVI I: :.:1.&& t : t : t VOL II% 111.14 Y.., TE• W.A. 0.1.0/ Y... --- .•:?••-.X.:-. I Or :111.111C ;:i.; tt Al: 1...g II MT. 1.601 Y.& 11 I. IIITZ Vol &AR As 1..1. r . ALMO I 4 . s ttttt ...........soo•. t• 0% $ 1 ! ...\ • I ..• I ^ OR 1 1.' i . ;......, ... -....., . Coo...... 11.....01 . li!VX ':I; I DIRT -- :::: 1 11. OFC11161.• ..... 1. me ttttttt CO.R• III 011.• Mar .00 .. a 0 fi •••• ; e!. 1 ! !. !. \ .5 •I : ‘`'..'' \ \ ,..• , E , E '''' : •.... ' ., C . ; 1.7" • - 1,1 r .• •••• ( TANN REMOVAL AREA / ,. A C .... ,. ...„.. -. i! DULT1.1.11.03J. 0........ 1,, ..... ..: -. I ti'''. ;..•.,, u , 4 ....... ttttt .001 40.019 ... 00: , Mt01.10.• ••000. 011 [...tin 7 - . I .... 0 r. ...too stosrl. SEACILSO117 LIE. 3 ', sts_,:ft..,,,,,:,..,•.... .....0. 1 1 - • . 01.1..C. V.s... ; C•0•Ala .; ;. 1 ... CAT ; 1001. A C ' --i ./ . .. •v- - E -'" - - .... . i A . , s•'... I I • ---- "'" --- 7.11"11;1'.11.1%■" ''" '4:1111; ' 1.1--- '--- ' • __ .....- A ttttt AS ; s i,' . „O' ' ,1\ . C ■ • ••• ....‘ rOLAYSI \ 0 .. • Ts '''''' AT roirial% . /VC .11.1. IC.. Dos.100 ...1.10 An 10 TER ...,, e... DEE. 0:1011.1.;:o A C. ' ,.. . •. =•....... L.. ..... . RI. aye, •.0.1•Gly, 1.11.11011A• i 0.110.. CIU.101 Or 1.11. IE. low.fr II FMK, C.O• • . OM. CY, 0•0 A. ,,, ....,, ......• .„%.•? 1 rqo::■..TZli.71'..i+1 . ,••L' . •E • .g / .C... 111.11 111 ttttt JO , tttttttttt &sty.. MAC. I ..1 tttttttt • Inn ALD. T. tttttttttt or .. •,.....0 %say rtrII ......1. AT TM #01. Dr afflayTo....1. At 0 DA TAWS •au. ‘ I 1.11. .• 1. ' '.. , • • Ile -, • •• .- .• 20/ 73 - .1 II. SOWN tttttttt • •Of 111.67 FM. .1.0. '''''''' tttt 3. ss res71 1 ... II... rt. To _ ._. , -_ / , /-,/ , -/ , ,,,-; / ,- -- /.7: C • :, 8•1 els.. , "••••• • ,,,... ••• -• r• ri /0..00. \ ••••••,....; •"'"*" •••.' ''.4 ... - '''' ,f‘.1 ' 41 ii. X: s `.. •:‘ - RI ----....!, yr[7. 4'-• s I. Ihil T ED ... -- ... ' -- - DI ii T KCCE SS ••1 .. • .. ' T. T&O. r031. in ALG1.1.1 ••,::.. - 1 . , ........ litE 4.1Y • ..‘,.. . ...I, , .:1-- DI - ...•,••., Io. , • . A. I... -. I=I - .. - - -.. .- A A . ...... L ystonaTIo• or for ..... Or , VI. 2.'1 .:•::.,, •- •-10•01.10 k I: i !!..! , • y ,I." • : L:•;:i.:iiti: ,,,, .... ,• ■ ...._....„ 0 ‘ !,.... - 4. INTERURBAN - 1 .... ... ,..• ss , , -, :: -- r .. AVENUE 1:. • . . - 11 -- - " "s \ .... s 1 ,.... Uflh f1CAf101 TA. TO. Man, 1...r• RI Yr :1Z =;:■•";;;. Or 111/1141.. OP ...YU IMP WO ............................... 10600-, ...... OVE•1•41. Sr (Myr. TM: I•sawave COM. Or NA:1IZG, Ift C1.111•1•T Po. . IAA cc. ..11 Mu. MI MT. blurs. TVIla ..... •••• 1111. ea. 0. Gli NM 1 J J M 1.29.07 8200200 0 0 0 INTERURBAN AVE. S. 810 CONSTRUCTION AS-8 MT DRAWING u wwlw ISMS PORT OATS APPROVED PERMIT ROIGj N. . ASSOCIATES 0 SOUTH CENTER OIL RLM90N5 LEGEtill MUM OWES IS.a(Y CAWS —11E1 SM■ A 11.0E0 QOM ...HIM IFWD LOIGaf ---�� S GRUa1 NAKW 0■0aESD Mar Ins ORADINO PLAN 13435 INTERURBAN AVE. S. TUNWILA. WASHINCION Ff SCAIL' 1 - 10' -0' BATE: 3/10/92 C.D.N. IX O.J.W. APP. N.E.S. SS SS) IIBI 9007.10 G-1 • SIGN ELEVATION • • - •• ..- • lnr snll S4 am_ .D SRO. .K roll f l I 11 rM nw+ +f) +N Nwm Cu ul fRLL N.l .a.s . -r�.[ MO•1 -A9.0 r0■• Y ravel. SAM COO SOMOS 11a L fl n.fl II $ L Y rrtR +N 4a.G[LL•WD 10 1011. K arr •• cart .«. 1..w.110.0 ' Ant a •smiil.in i. n. was u.wC11[.1 r aK +a wR •••. a SO • snn MK x031 r -V Inc 10. • • • I 0 r1 •vacm +m .....on o .. (I) r i+•NS suntan r- •.o•r -r 3 0 ..0..11 i raoac ro ws. rosn1 - -- ELEVATION: CEDAR TRASH ENCLOSURE -it l 10• 1. _. PERMIT BID . -r CONSTRUCTION ' r -r I +ua r - :¢ I Q 0 .1 .': d .w w Sian N•, to sus rl ssnu +N 73 0 1 L. 241.10.06 IWIO I'P! - RAT[ APP*0N6 ELEVATION CEDAR TRASH ENCLOSURE sc. lrr.r.r AS -BUILT QIUNWQ t X 11OS9.11T N.( Y AssOCAT[S /) W a. : J 1. ... .A SOUTH CENTER OIL 91)9015 13435 INTERURBAN AVE. S. 10091 A. WASNRIGION Sall: 1/2 .1-0 OAIE: 03/26/9. 01 D.J.W. OI D.J.W. APP. N.E.S. S5) AU/ 9067.10 A —� wU1 Center A O - PACIFIC- c 0+ur.01" rani.. SUPER 0.00 16 UNLEADED 0.00 REGULAR O.00Io DIESEL 0.001 SIGN ELEVATION • • - •• ..- • lnr snll S4 am_ .D SRO. .K roll f l I 11 rM nw+ +f) +N Nwm Cu ul fRLL N.l .a.s . -r�.[ MO•1 -A9.0 r0■• Y ravel. SAM COO SOMOS 11a L fl n.fl II $ L Y rrtR +N 4a.G[LL•WD 10 1011. K arr •• cart .«. 1..w.110.0 ' Ant a •smiil.in i. n. was u.wC11[.1 r aK +a wR •••. a SO • snn MK x031 r -V Inc 10. • • • I 0 r1 •vacm +m .....on o .. (I) r i+•NS suntan r- •.o•r -r 3 0 ..0..11 i raoac ro ws. rosn1 - -- ELEVATION: CEDAR TRASH ENCLOSURE -it l 10• 1. _. PERMIT BID . -r CONSTRUCTION ' r -r I +ua r - :¢ I Q 0 .1 .': d .w w Sian N•, to sus rl ssnu +N 73 0 1 L. 241.10.06 IWIO I'P! - RAT[ APP*0N6 ELEVATION CEDAR TRASH ENCLOSURE sc. lrr.r.r AS -BUILT QIUNWQ t X 11OS9.11T N.( Y AssOCAT[S /) W a. : J 1. ... .A SOUTH CENTER OIL 91)9015 13435 INTERURBAN AVE. S. 10091 A. WASNRIGION Sall: 1/2 .1-0 OAIE: 03/26/9. 01 D.J.W. OI D.J.W. APP. N.E.S. S5) AU/ 9067.10 A —� CC J P W V' v P 00 1 Z y W = H (0 LL N 1188 - L7- .' M' £84.!8 771Xiwe...4 0riz 1392 CZ 9. 7 41 304.7 i �w ruKW”t.4 040. / ?o9 i 9/250 /875 0/50 l . /Oa 0210 9z5 1 ' \ \ �\ \�f R 3- 0 s s \ 2 \Cc:% N C X 1644958.20 , it. ° F140-01'04 '✓ ,z0.15 f ^' 6 >E• 0 130 r . a 41 ' 16;1 +0 . 0 f r;TY Or ►UKWIL.A FINING DEPT. N 88-38 - 13W 2619'27 — SWI4 1 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Eight position fueling facility with sales kiosk and bathroom. Also included is a canopy over fueling positions with a pitched roof. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) 13435 Interurban AvP_ Snuth Quarter: NW Section: 1 Township: 23 Range: 4E 3. APPLICANT:* Name: Mark Cross C/0 Robert M. Lee and Associates, Inc. Address: 1520 140th Ave NE, Bellevue, WA 98005 Phone. 1- 206 - 746 -4677 Signature: 4 /( Date: /uo * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. 4. PROPERTY Name: OWNER SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (This information may be found on your tax statement) AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP Mr. Jim Thorp C/0 South Center Oil 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 Address: 730 S. Central Ave. Kent, WA 98032 Phone: 1-206- 852 -2777 I /WE,[signature(s)] swear that I /we are owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: J?/2 o /J S 4iORELINE SUBSTANTIAL,nWELOPMENT APPLICATION 5. Present use of property: The site was most recently occupied as a mini -mart and fueling facility. It is now vacant and in the process of demolition and site • 6. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project (include additional future developments contemplated but not included in this application): 150,000 along with new leakage detectors. Page 2 7. List the master program policies (use program sections or page numbers) which are applicable to this development: SPP attached list_ HnwPVPr, WP feel that the prnjert meets the goals and ohjectives of the Shoreline plan by setting back 150 from river, including upgraded water quality design features such as oil /water separator and grass lined swale. Also environmental protection is higher with new double wall tanks and piping 8. List any other permits for this project from state, federal or local governmental agencies for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for (and if so, the date of the application), whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same, and the number of the application or permit: City of Tukwila- Design review, Shoreline substantial development permit and grading and building permits. Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency- Tank registration. 9. Nature of the existing shoreline. Describe type of shoreline, such as stream, lake, marsh, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike; material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any (to be completed by local official): 10. In the event that any of the proposed builidngs or structures will exceed a height of thirty -five feet above the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view (to be completed by local official): CGti 'net SlIORELINE SUBSTANTIAL] 'VELOPMENT APPLICATION Page 3 11. If the application involves a Conditional Use or Variance, set forth in full that portion of the Master Program which provides that the proposed use may be a Conditional Use or, in the case of a Variance, from which the variance is being sought (to be completed by local official): 12. Give a brief narrative description of the general nature of the improvements and land use within one thousand (1,000) feet in all directions from the development site: The South Center Oil site is surrounded on thr4 ides by a Metro Park and Ride lot. Beyond the Metro lot and up the hill to the north and west is Interstate 5. To the south and west of this site the area is in single family residential usage. Across Interurban Ave. S to the north and west is a large warehouse and furniture store. To the east of this site is a five lane road, Interurban Ave. S. and then the Green River. Beyond the river to the east is single family residential use. To the south and east across Interurban Ave. South is the Foster Golf Course. Overall Goals- Goal 2, page 4.1 - This project meets this goal by improving stormwater runoff with a grasslined swale, and by reducing the amount of impervious surfaces on site. Economic Development- Goal 4, page 4.2 - only a small portion of this project is within two hundred feet of the creek. Commercial activity is moved back from the shoreline as far as possible. Public Access Element- page 4.3, and the Circulation Element page 4.4 - This project meets Public Access goals and policies by providing for pedestrian ciruculation along Interurban Ave. Limiting access to one driveway and egress to one driveway will limit vehicle pedestrian conflicts. The proposal is far enough back in the 200 foot shoreline zone so that future access to the river is not impacted. Concervation Element- Goal 4, page 4.7 - Water quality is preserved by installing an oil /water separator and a grass lined swale. Landscaping is increased. Fuel storage is moved further from river than in the previous fueling facility and the fuel storage and handling equipment is all new and state of the art including leak detection systems.