HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L92-0030 - ROBERT H LEE ASSOCIATES - SOUTHCENTER OIL FUEL STATION DESIGN REVIEWL92-0030
SOUTHCENTER OIL FUEL STATION
June 1, 1992
Mr. Mark Cross, Senior Planner
Robert H. Lee Associates
1520 140th Avenue NE #200
Bellevue, WA 98005
Dear Mr. Cross:
NOTICE OF DECISION
RE: Notice of Decision by the Board of Architectural Review
File Number: L92 -0030: SOUTHCENTER OIL
1. Canopy support posts shall be painted a light
color.
2. Multi- colored fascia shall extended along
entire canopy roof.
City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor
Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director
This is to confirm that the Board of Architectural Review (BAR)
approved the above project as presented on May 28, 1992, with the
three conditions noted below. The BAR also adopted the findings
and conclusions contained in the Staff Report dated 5/18/92.' The
conditions of your project approval are as follows:
3. Accent trim, such as trim around the window
and sign, shall be added to the kiosk (see
attached sketch of staff recommendation).
Revised drawings which implement these conditions shall be
approved by the Director of Community Development and included in
the final building permit drawings. Minor, incidental changes to
the approved plans or design may be administratively approved by
the Director. However, please note that any significant changes
will require further review and approval by the BAR.
The decision of the BAR is not final until the appeal period.has
elapsed, which is ten calendar days after the above date of
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665
1 u+.f7+lAC,Vretiwtr,n7i iRla; ; :":bcn x_11.V.,Y,51, :.:01.0, c.ra
Sincerely,
Ann Siegenthaler
AsNistant Planner
cc: File
Mr. Mark Cross
BAR Southcenter Oil, 6/1/92
Page 2
. ... ...................«. ......,..._. ....n....a,15r+.n: t >^.^.xik „1 f..'A':d.^r. 'tYf
decision. Appeals must be filed in writing to the City Clerk by
5:00 p.m. on the final day of the appeal period. Where the final
day of an appeal period falls on a weekend or holiday the appeal
period will be extended to 5:00 pm. on the next work day.
If you have any questions regarding this project or the BAR
decision, please feel free to write or call.
:aLth :zrf,Xair". `= tv.I..: 4 ^ii l '.' :k '
20 GAUGE SHEET METAL PANELS.
PAINT OFF WHITE WITH PACIFIC PRIDE
BROWN TRIM.
4' -0" METAL FASCIA PANELS.
N
0
3' -4" X 6' -6" OWNER'S SIGN.
r awe-vzaric� ,re.r.∎ v im- -�f;9
rrr! outh 0'; � Cent •r \
Oil Inc.
[ /
r
4
EAST ELEVATION
. • 1 t , 1 _ _. r :. 1 . . ,
, . ._.._ .� - __� T ��
CIO CI
1
}
•
\ /
,/
C STRIPES, PAINT 'PACIFIC PRIDE BROWN
\ PAINT PACIFIC'PRIDE DARK ORANGE
!), PAINT PACIFIC PRIDE ORANGE
I PAINT ACIFI PRIDE YELLOW
/
t f
. .
1 4" STRIPES, PAINT PACIF1C PRIDE
• PAINT PACIFIC
PAINT PACIFIC
c
�
PAINT PACIFIC
•
DARK ORANGE
PRIDE ORANGE
PRIDE YELLOW
-�---
L- L l . | L L -- L-_'_-_____
7 ', • ,. �-,-�- ---------
'/-_�_'� ' •
.' ,'',� .--,_ ------
/ � ' / / ' � / '
-_-^'-_-'_. -'_- _ --_ - _----_ - '_
. . . . . . . . . . .
^']�/[/[
� �� ^ | '' ^ �'' ^r
--�-� `' � '' �
NORTH ELEVATION
HEARING DATE:
PROJECT:
APPLICANT:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
ACREAGE:
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN DESIGNATION:
ZONING DISTRICT:
SEPA
DETERMINATION:
STAFF:
ATTACHMENTS:
City of Tukwila
Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director
STAFF REPORT
TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
Prepared 5/18/92
May 28, 1992
L92 -0030: SOUTHCENTER OIL FUEL STATION DESIGN REVIEW
Southcenter Oil
To develop a fuel station with 112 - square -foot kiosk for
"card lock" sales, fuel -pump canopy with eight fueling
positions, including installation of new underground fuel
tanks, and perimeter landscaping.
13435 Interurban Avenue South
Approximately .6 acre (27,670 square feet)
Commercial
C -2
DNS issued on May 14, 1992
Ann Siegenthaler
. _...
A. Site Plan
B. Landscape Plan
C. Canopy & Kiosk Elevations
D. Details of Proposed Sign & Trash Enclosure
E. Color Board (to be submitted at meeting)
F. Staff Recommendations
G. Applicant's Response to General Criteria
I C. c ry
John W. Rants, Mayor
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665
Staff Report to B.A.R. L92 -0030: Southcenter Oil
Page 2
VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION
BACKGROUND
FINDINGS
1. Project Description
The applicant proposes to develop a fuel station for "card lock" sales of diesel and
gas. This would include a fuel pump canopy with eight fueling positions, and a 112 -
square- foot kiosk manned during peak hours of operation. The proposal includes
installation of new underground fuel tanks, temporary remediation equipment for
treating soil around the tanks, and perimeter landscaping.
2. Existing Development
The site previously housed a Texaco gas station, which included a canopy over pump
islands, and a convenience store. Underground fuel tanks have been removed to
prepare for replacement with new tanks which meet Dept. of Ecology standards.
The City has installed new sidewalk and street landscaping along Interurban in front
of the project.
3. Surrounding Land Uses
On the north, west and south is a Metro Park and Ride lot, with residential areas
beyond to the west. The Duwamish River is located approximately 125' to the east,
across Interurban Avenue.
4. Vegetation
The site was previously landscaped. Existing trees are stunted; shrub and
groundcover infill has been inadequate, leaving large bare areas.
The Southcenter Oil project requires Board of Architectural Review (B.A.R.) approval due
to its location in the Interurban Special Review District. The site is also in the Shorelines
Zone. In 1984, the B.A.R. approved Gull Industries' proposed remodel of a gas station on
this site into the existing gas station /convenience store. In 1990, the B.A.R. reviewed a
proposal by Texaco for renovation of the canopy and convenience store, but the proposal
was later withdrawn by the applicant.
Southcenter Oil is requesting B.A.R. approval of its proposal under two sets of guidelines:
I. the B.A.R. General Review Criteria;
II. the Interurban Special Review District guidelines.
Staff Report to B.A.R.
Page 3
DECISION CRITERIA
Accordingly, the staff report is divided into two parts: General Review Criteria and
Interurban Special Review District Guidelines.
Board review criteria are shown below in bold, along with staff's summary of relevant facts.
The applicant's responses to the criteria are given in Attachment G.
I. GENERAL REVIEW GUIDELINES (TMC 18.60.050)
1. Relationship of Structure to Site.
2. Relationship of Structure & Site to Adjoining Area.
L92 -0030: Southcenter Oil
The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and
to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement.
Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the
visual impact of large paved areas.
- The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to its site.
Most of the site is paved open area, used for vehicle driveways and gas pump
lanes (see Attachment A). The dominant structure is the gas pump canopy. A
proposed 10 -foot landscape strip planted with trees and shrubs provides a
transition to the streetscape (see Attachment B). Service areas for the trash
dumpster and remediation equipment are screened, and near the rear of the site,
away from the most visible areas.
Harmony in texture, line and masses is encouraged.
Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided.
Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood
character.
Compatibility of vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities
in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged.
Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged.
The proposed canopy and kiosk are similar to those at other fuel /gas
stations (see Attachment C). The canopy is much taller than any adjacent
structures, and will be a prominent feature in the area. Some of the
Staff Report to B.A.R. L92 -0030: Southcenter Oil
Page 4
construction materials used in the project are residential in character (see
Building Design criteria).
Access to the site will be via two driveways from Interurban Avenue.
Customers will use a new left turn lane to enter the north driveway, and
will exit the site using the south driveway.
3. Landscape and Site Treatment.
Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development,
they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced.
Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety
and provide an inviting and stable appearance.
Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and
important axes, and provide shade.
In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic,
mitigating steps should be taken.
Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is
encouraged.
Screening of service yards and other places which tend to be unsightly should be
accomplished by the use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening
should be effective in winter and summer.
In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls,
and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used.
Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining
landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible
with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in
design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided.
The applicant has provided ten feet of landscaping on the front and sides of
the site. This exceeds the minimum requirement of five feet of landscaping
on the sides. Eight feet of landscaping is provided at the rear, although
none is required. Landscaping consists of medium -tall street trees, accent
conifers, screening shrubs and groundcover.
Mechanical service areas are enclosed by screening fencing: the dumpster
by wood fencing, and remediation equipment by chain link with cedar slats
(see Attachment D). They are also screened on three sides with tall shrubs
and trees.
Staff Report to B.A.R. L92 -0030: Southcenter Oil
Page 5
4. Building Design.
Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of
design and relationship to surroundings.
Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring
developments.
Building components, such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets, should have good
proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts
shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure.
Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent.
Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be
screened from view.
Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all
exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design.
Monotony of design in single or multiple building projects should be avoided. Variety of
detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest.
In the 1984 and 1990 B.A.R. reviews of the site, the B.A.R. decided that it
was appropriate for the gas pump canopy and other structures to have
pitched roofs. The applicant has followed this direction in the design of the
new Southcenter Oil station.. The canopy will have a pitched roof with dark
brown metal "shingles" (see Attachment C). It will be made of steel
painted dark brown, and will be supported by one - foot - square steel
columns. The 20' -6" high canopy will have a T- shape, with the short
portion oriented toward Interurban. This short part of the roof will have a
multi - colored fascia (see Attachment E, Color Board).
The facility is primarily an unmanned facility where repeat customers use a
card key to dispense and pay for fuel. However, the applicant also
proposes a small 112 - square -foot sales kiosk, to be manned during peak
hours (approx. 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.). The kiosk will be painted off -white
(see Attachment E). It stands approximately ten feet high, and has a flat
roof. To the east (Interurban) elevation of the kiosk, the applicant has
added a sign, transaction window and multi- colored fascia.
5. Miscellaneous Structures & Street Furniture
Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the
architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible
with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with
buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale.
Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should
meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings.
Staff Report to B.A.R.
Page 6
2. Relationship of Structure & Site to Adjoining Area.
3. Landscaping and Site Treatment.
4. Building Design.
L92 -0030: Southcenter Oil
No street furniture or similar structures are proposed.
CONCLUSIONS: GENERAL REVIEW GUIDELINES
1. Relationship of Structure to Site.
The height, scale and style of the proposed structure are appropriate to the
site's use as a fuel station. The canopy's east -west orientation divides the
site, which makes the paved areas appear smaller. Proposed landscaping
provides an appropriate transition to the streetscape.
The industrial appearance of this project is typical of most gas stations. It
does not fit well into the residential character of the surrounding
neighborhood. However, the applicant has proposed materials and colors
which help to create a better match between the proposed structures and
the adjoining area (see Building Design criteria). In addition, the site is
well - landscaped around the perimeter, which helps to moderate its
relationship to its surroundings.
The applicant has provided a high - quality landscape plan. Proposed
landscaping adequately buffers paved areas, provides necessary screening,
and adds visual interest to the project.
Located near a freeway interchange, and in the Interurban Special District,
the Southcenter Oil project will be very visible to the community. Given
this, the proposed structures do not have a level of architectural quality
which would complement the surrounding area. For example, the proposed
Staff Report to B.A.R.
Page 7
L92 -0030: Southcenter Oil
canopy and kiosk have little architectural interest. The visual "weight, ", or
mass, of the canopy roof is not balanced by the narrow support columns.
Also, the kiosk is not well - integrated with the canopy structure. Standing
approximately ten feet high, with a flat roof, the kiosk has a much different
scale and style than the canopy.
However, the applicant has already taken steps to improve the architectural
quality of the structures. For example, the pitched roof, metal "shingles"
and dark brown colors used in the project help to visually blend the project
with its surroundings. The canopy's height has been kept low, and it has
been given a T- shape. This provides modulation in the structure, and helps
to minimize the impact of its profile from Interurban. The applicant has
also added a sign and multi - colored fascia to the east (Interurban) elevation
of the kiosk to create architectural interest.
The modifications noted above begin to address the need for a quality
project at this visible location. Given the project's visibility, further changes
would be appropriate. For example, extending the multi-colored fascia
around the entire canopy would give the project a more finished look. The
support columns could be enlarged, without interfering with circulation or
structural integrity. This would create a better match between architectural
elements of the canopy. The canopy would appear to be designed as a
significant building, rather than a "pole structure." Also, additional detailing
on the kiosk would help to refine its appearance.
5. Miscellaneous Structures & Street Furniture.
Not applicable.
II. INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT (TMC 18.60.060)
Special Review Guidelines Applicable to All Proposed Developments:
1. Proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities
of the area.
Previous development of the site left no natural amenities on -site. The
Staff Report to B.A.R. L92 -0030: Southcenter Oil
Page 8
project is located near the river environment, but is separated from the
river by Interurban Avenue.
2. Proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and
enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities.
The project does not incorporate any passive or active recreational uses,
nor does it complement existing recreation in the Interurban corridor. At
the same time, development of the site as a fuel facility does not reduce or
interfere with recreational opportunities.
3. Proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site
pedestrian circulation.
The card -lock fuel station is an auto - oriented use, with site circulation and
access designed for the motorist (see Attachment A). The use of one -way
driveways helps to reduce the potential pedestrian -auto conflicts.
4. Proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and
complementary to the district in which it is located.
Like other gas stations nearby, this project takes advantage of the site's
easy access to major highways. It is not incompatible with other
commercial uses in the area. However, the project does not provide any
pedestrian or recreational amenities. Nor does the project provide visual or
physical connection to the District's history or natural features.
5. Proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse
environmental impact statement.
Potential adverse environmental impacts have been resolved through the
applicant's SEPA environmental review. The Southcenter Oil project is an
improvement over the previous development in that it further reduces
environmental impacts. For example, more landscaping has been added,
and biofiltration swales will improve the quality of stormwater runoff
Staff Report to B.A.R. L92 -0030: Southcenter Oil
Page 9
6. Proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant
historical features of the area.
The project does not respond to the historical features of the area. For
example, the architecture does not reference the history of Interurban, the
river, or development of the community. However, the Southcenter Oil
project does not interfere with the public's visual or physical access to
historical features.
CONCLUSIONS: INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT
1. Proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities
of the area.
The project does not respond to the nearby river environment. However,
its location opposite Interurban Avenue makes it difficult for the project to
reference or connect to the river.
2. Proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and
enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities.
Given the nature of a fuel /gas station facility, the project reflects an
appropriate level of regard for recreational facilities.
3. Proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site
pedestrian circulation.
While the site is necessarily auto - oriented, the design of circulation provides
an appropriate level of pedestrian convenience and safety.
4. Proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and
complementary to the district in which it is located.
The Southcenter Oil project does not enhance the Interurban District, does
not complement the area's amenities, nor provide recreation or services
Staff Report to B.A.R.
Page 10
L92 -0030: Southcenter Oil
for nearby residents. Opportunities to do that are limited by the nature of
a card lock fuel facility. However, the project is in a special area.
Therefore, it is important to improve the project as much as possible. This
could be achieved with some minor modifications in the canopy and kiosk.
Staff's recommended modifications are shown in Attachment F.
5. Proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse
environmental impacts.
Southcenter Oil has minimized the environmental impacts of the project.
6. Proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant
historical features of the area.
Given the nature of the project as a fuel /gas station facility, the project
reflects an appropriate level of regard for historical features.
Staff recommends that the Southcenter Oil proposal be approved with the conditions listed
below (see also Attachment F). Staff also recommends that revised drawings to the Director
of Community Development for approval.
Conditions of approval:
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Give the canopy more visual mass, by widening the support columns to
2' x 2' size, to the extent possible without interfering with circulation or
structural integrity.
2. Extend the multi - colored fascia around the entire canopy.
3. Add detailing to kiosk, such as trim around window and sign.
—
r SAMMY SIMI-
11111f. •ou
4111. P11■10.11
•
111.214. •
• WA C.C.
. sus. MR 111.411111•
101.1111. • •• •
(111 DM.) •
1! CPC an
"*""
—11.1110 CONC.14/1
SITE PLAN
4.141 VW.
••■•
VON KUL 14.111C IFNI RA/
,111•01 D.C11.11. •
1ATACM 1.41. 14! A.
MCA la IC Mel. be
1141.401 MOM. r 4 . a . X
WM MM. INCA
r.r W
CM1.1l/C1 /.0 7T-11
UM CANC..
D
4w/if 'vi
I
• I
( 143 a ):
r - -
1141
1111 C ITU C.O..
1 SRI KU.
4314
1..0 MM..
17==1
MCC ••• S■1414111l11111. COMIC,
L..,
...COE COMM
111.A CUM 11.41101
113 NMI
14. WAY
SA/011.111.1
SCALE: 1.10'.-0
MCC 411314.AG
Jr..r
• t 41 lor
0
01[111
0
. • •
) )
,_ •••"
INTERURBAN AVE. S.
L.141■14■
r
— 1411 1 11144
WM.
o — 1 - VAL (1.1.1)
C e2j1 • 4111,17IIrinir.41 '•
- 1 C/
CMG
1•••1 1 11 MS MA. C/VO
r 11/1/ (.
(3yworAcy 001111501
"%nom cowar..
DITT:POIDI Par
lAoCICAPINO
1
0 7 —
0111.1.. RV *LA (1 !ASA
111/1,1141.
410111 11101
r 11.11. !KR
t•-•4
131111•111.1111.
7;11 mome
my. A/C —
1
PERMIT
BID
CONSIRUCT1ON
AS-.T DRAWN]
MANIAS MUD fa%
04TE
APPROWD
0
110111113T (4. Act a ASSOCIAITI1
SOUTH CENTER OIL
rot on wwwagAn
A
A
A
11 !ACC
1WVZIOTS
GENERAL NOTE:
CCM .01 11.0111114C4 IN !A 1034114.41
CV 1111.1.111 UK.
111/.; 137;
6
•
•
SITE PLAN
13435 INTERURBAN AVE. S.
TUKVALA. WASHINGTON
SOIL 1 w DAM 02/13/9:
DR D.J.W. 01. D.J.W. P. H.E.S.
5#
Xtli 9067.10
A-1
ndscwe Si ocIIIcations
SIDEWALK
EX TNG LANDSCAPNG
uC )
k
'SIDEWALK'
PLANT LEGEND
2w.
101n6A taea nnllt_ w.t e.•
4. O a»e ti
W. r.,,.«..e•• .
crow qt .+...<_w v
t eeafeea
lee MY
Ora larte
°w..... crow. . r ...• •.r. •...
• . 11 W
WHIM
n.1...I I wM
_..W.a.,
a..A.a
GPO
ocb
IIIII■ Adair.
at •- o ,- — o o Q
1w w••s.r..•• •t
•
°
TRASH
�. EKlLWI
O a , °
0
f
•
W
L.
a
1 O E.arOaan Tres Planting
ax..
O H•. Mf. Deciduous Tres Planting appl 131152
- ..w.An
..y.
MOO..
.140111 •FICI•
le e, MVO. A..c<s
nA"n a 1110 .11
A.C. TRANSIT PARK 8 RIDE
INTERURBAN AVENUE
alna•
Dr.... r •la
GENERAL NOTE.
Y• %KIT L.1 Me ..e.0 /8C. SRR.
Lalldaaaa. Plaits
•. 8.4fl ...ar•....•... ma. won t. M e sotto
e w n.r. we* .W »5 ..w.. et••IrA...a
tsw• *ewe
3 r. fa IMO. ww w o o , : �,.. w+•.
aMM O
• w...rr • ■.••.rw.«_ W...ote V.
f r....rr. Orr wrw.ww r • r
WW
r
e0 Pt YAW
».a ate
1•.10' 3.1741
"•1 L. 1
0
m
z J
n
•• 1+•111L 1.11.01C 141:( u4 M . .
/WI ; :1(iiu 0 flu
..wi .1100 MEW 1
.N.1 .•OC P.M
.• 01DD(A 1.1 P.M (Da( DM 14((
PAW O *3 nom .. MIA
r -t 0I•. ran. runs. -
P000 0011 M( :741.:=
(.Y'(
YO... I.Y
r•P . 1' - ONO] so.
NORTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
000
1[101 N0L11G/11 MOWy
(:li 1::r.
00
nua 1DR •r Itr,
O•••• I1*I tab DAIL AM•O*W ELEVATIONS
SOUTH CENTER OIL
PERMIT
BID
CONSTRUCTION
AS -WILT DRA*40 A
Rgg yLIZ b AI$OCIAIL*
T
....... �.........5-. :.1. 1y
0
KIWIS
271 PI. Off .W.t+I■1(s
13435 INTERURBAN AYE. S.
1U0161A. WASHINGTON
SCNL• 1/4' - 1 -0' DAR; 03/17/9:
DR, 0.J.W. 01. D.J.W. APP, - --
SSA
JOB) 9067.10
•
A-4
r A-F ' iS ' iF � r .0-1
Center -
O /Center
Inc.
----- P A C I'F I G - -- --
PR1 DE
SUPER 0.00 i6
UNLEADED O,OO?.
REGULAR O.00 4
DIESEL 0.004
4•-r
SIGN ELEVATION
— 0001.00 0
/4.0 P.<1 1705.00
r I r 4 On, 4•1 n. 7o 1111.
ar.✓efUK O Vol x ow r 44 (04 mrxn .x..000 r»
Nrt. 7rt0 tx.LL •4t 4.xM1
ow• -100. 0m.11 Cr P..I. ••
r 4 4• 0541 710 410 1011..141
4M .IL 0 4 P 111 7100
1s .m L✓i5I u5 .n5 ro ror
I. . wi 4••14014 40 Mat.
104x0L—
iii`wrt 1mi c1 "n .4✓ 0 Zit
nw art?
00 1114 x•00 x a.1xu
Nx, u4• xOn — "—
ouu aaxr..WI+m -_. - - -.
r.
C nem w.1z -- - -
4 m 6.4MM 7440 1u1
r -r oa—
rt 004•440
4•x. `°' - -'-�
(7) 0. 11141.0* cb4I7 ,1—
ELEVATION: CEDAR TRASH ENCLOSURE
BID
=_. _== d t = = ==
r -4•w . r.r - : rt I � 1
w�e 4•117{ — i
I4• -E
ELEVATION: CEDAR TRASH ENCLOSURE
£0A 440/ l 04ID /7h DAtt ANM D
M
VER iTr SOUTH CENTER OIL
1
.
CCNSTRUC1
....1.111..11.
AS-61.11L7 DRAMNO
1. : 0 :rt "n0 e a o: 410 RI= `0144
e --- .0..000 4•o su .r .e. =Haw tan nwacc
I' " - --
= = F = = ===
•-r
w 4•
1444 1K.r -r
e =D/ ;11. tlI III S A1tl
Of 9067.10
•
13435 INTERURBAN AVE. S.
IUKWLA. WASHINGTON
SCALD 1/2 .1-0 9A1E• 03/26/9;
DV. D.J.W. 04. O.J.W. AM. 11.0.5.
A -5
4 .*+n. PWt PACK P* d0_
P. g. .(11 , 74 e.. d
roar Pro rt MILK TU1O
PAM •1..0 •MU dorms
A• 3.IM111W 1 I/OC - 0 fl
Wt P■OC MK( 0100
IWI Mre IPM 7WM
ADP
KrOsk
MAW
p-C WI./ I 410 74.1
sixt NIT K7A 74.11.
L W, NM r.M 0.0 Pop(
l.rr
r -.• . r - .• c.A. 4 trx
NORTH ELEVATION
a.
EAST ELEVATION
000
..1A1 MYI0(D■. p0�4
(7411 ” t nuot � w )
00
//� ra r�r0.rr
ld I �M i r• - Y
70104 1137 At .
adv ri ®
0KAIWIDE >0 TOM
PERMIT
010
DATE
CONSTRUCTION
AS -Bl1LT DRAWN0
AP7•0fID
06017 44. P LR r A,300AT0
SOUTH CENTER OIL
mows
A fl WI' WHs r. VV * I •••■
A
A
ELEVA11CWS
13435 INTERURBAN AVE 5.
TUKYALA. WASHINGTON
s4 •
AE j 9067.10 .
WALL I/4 . 1-0 DAM 03/17/
DO.0.LW. 01. D.A.W. APP. ___
A -4
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOLK PROPOSAL: Retail Fuel Faci 1 i ty designed for both
maned and unmaned operation.
PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub-
division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection)
13435 Interurban Avenue
Quarter: NW S ect i on: 14 Township: 23 Range: 04
(This information may be found on your tax statement)
Mark Cross, Senior Planner
3. APPLICANT:* Name: ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Address- 1520 -140th Avenue N.E. , Suite 200, Bellevue, WA 98005
P one
(206) 746 -4677
Signature: 1 l - Date: 3/26/92
* The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and
to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant.
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
Mr. Jim Thorp
4. PROPERTY . Name: SOUTH CENTER OIL
OWNER
BOARD OF ARC!: "TECTURAL REVIEW
DESIGk
APPLICATION
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 96188
Telephone: (206) 431 -3680
Address: 730 South Central Ave. , Kent, WA 98032
Phone: (206) 852 - 2777
I /WE,[signature(s)]
swear that I /we are the awner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this
application are true and correct to the
best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date:
ATTACHMENT G
BOARD OF ARCHITECTU' L REVIEW
DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC
The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your proposed project.
Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each criterion (if appropriate), and describe how
your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient,
attach additional response to this form.
1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE
A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to
provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement.
B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed; and screened to moderate the visual
impact of large paved areas.
C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site.
RESPONSE:
CRITERIA
Page 2
We have used a vesidetial roof line for the Fuel canopy. Landscaping plan
includes Evergreens to provide some year round buffer. Also we have reduced
impervious surface to make room for additional landscaping and grass lined
swale. The site will have much more landscaping than previous facility.
2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA
A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged.
B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided.
C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood
character.
D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of
safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged.
E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged.
RESPONSE:
We have made extra effort to have a very good landscape plan. We have used
a pitched "residential" roofline. Circulation has been made one way. (Enter
north driveway, exit south driveway) the improves vehicle circulation and
limits potential conflicts with pedestrians.
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC ( DN_
We think the plan from Mark Weisman and Associates does that.
attached elevations.
RESPONSE:
The main landscaping challenge was to design a planting layout that would
Page 3
3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT .
A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they
should be recognized and preserved and enhanced.
B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and
provide an inviting and stable appearance.
C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important
axis, and provide shade.
D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic,
mitigating steps should be taken.
E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encour-
aged.
F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accom-
plished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be
effective in winter and summer.
G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and
pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used.
H. Exterior lighting, when used, should.enhance the building design and the adjoining land-
scape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the
building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive
brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided.
allow the incorporation of a grass lined swale to meet water quality standards.
Primary lighting for vehicle fueling comes from lights under the canopy. See
Plantings have been coordinated with pedestrian sidewalks and plantings done
by Metro on surrounding property.
4. BUILDING DESIGN
A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its
design and relationship to surroundings.
B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring de-
velopments.
BOARD OF ARCF-IITECTUF _ REVIEW `. •
DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC YON Page 4
C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good pro-
portions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be
consistent with anticipated life of the structure.
D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent.
E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be
screened from view.
F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all ex-
posed accessories should be harmonious with building design.
G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of
detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest.
RESPONSE:
The "T" shaped canopy with a pitched roof line will keen a "residential" lnnk
to the proposal. Roofing will be dark to avoid brillant colors. Mechanical
Equipment will be inside the Retail /bathroom buildina.
The only bright colors will be on the freestanding sion. See attached.
The dumpster will be screened with wood fencing.
5. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE
A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architec-
tural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale
should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and
proportions should be to scale.
B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous 'structures and street furniture should meet the
guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings.
RESPONSE:
Colors and materials will be coordinated on site. The dumpster will be
screened.
.BOAi-3U Or Ai-tC:rii t CC;I UR iicY1CYY
-• DESIGN REVIEW APPLICC .ION Page 5
INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT
The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area in order to manage
the development of this area, to upgrade its general appearance, to provide incentives for
compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize on the benefits to the area of the amenities including
the Green River and nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people -
oriented use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth. Please
describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this District. Use additional
response space, if necessary.
1. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area.
Site grading and filling are limited to keep to existing grades as much as
possible.
2. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment
of public recreational areas and facilities.
New pedestrian sidewalks and plantings have just been completed along entire
street frontage. Proposed use eliminates previous retail food sales.
3. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site pedestrian circu-
lation.
.. . .
Interurban has been installed. Circulation
1 Ki.sk or bathroom is under well li•hted
cann ily
The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complementary
to the district in which it is located.
We feel the use is compatible with adjacent park and ride lot and that the
pitched roof will be compatible with the residential use to the south and
west.
5. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse environmental im-
pacts. •
Project proposal will decrease the paving from previous use. Increase the
landscaping and include upgraded water quality storm drainage system.
6. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features
in the area.
'th the historical develo•ment .attern of the area.
.. _..,_.... i_.... ,..,... .,. �.�. tit.
STEVEN J. KATTNEPI
Architect
t- T
i
May 1, 1992
Ms. Anne Siegenthaler
Assistant Planner
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
D.C.D. suite 100
Tukwila, WA 98188
Dear Ms. Siegenthaler,
Sincerely,
ROBERT H. LEE AND ASSOCIATES, Inc.
Mark Cross
Senior Planner
attachments
9067\newplan.ltr
ROBERT H.
ARCHITECTURE
15E0 940th AVENUE. N.M.
[E0E] 74E -4E77
t4.�' ' .uti; ,�
LEE & ABBOCIATES, INC.
PLANNING
• SUITE ROO •
ENGINEERING
BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 9B005
FAX [ROE] 748 -883E
RE: Supplemental application material for South Center Oil card -lock and retail fuel facility
at 13435 Interurban Ave. S.
Attached are new exhibits and drawings related to the South Center Oil card -lock proposal.
First, we had the landscape plan revised to include additional screening at the base of the fir trees
and to add hedge material along the grass lined water quality swales. In addition, the landscape
buffer along Interurban has been widened from 8 to 10 feet.
A second item we wanted to submit was additional information on the remediation equipment that
will be located at the southwest corner of the site on a temporary basis. Attached are photos of an
actual installation. Our proposal would be to have the six foot high chainlink fencing with wood slats.
The equipment itself will be at least one foot lower than the fence. The photos show an installation
with a different color scheme. Because of the brown color scheme for the building, we would
propose to have natural redwood or cedar slats in the fence. Keep in mind that the fence, equipment
and concrete slab will be removed at the end of the remediation program. Barbed wire will not be
used as shown on the fence.
Also attached is a ]petal building sample. We have modified the elevations of the building to show
a painted trim pattern with the main body of the building being off white in color. Once we have
reached agreement on the landscape plan and planter widths, we will alter the site plan to reflect
the new buffer widths and supply you with PMTs of the landscape plan and site plan.
HAY Q 1 1992
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANKING DEPT.
April 24, 1992
▪ •
A CILCCRP Company
Mr. Mark Cross
Robert H. Lee and Associates
1520 140th Ave. N.E. Suite 200
Bellevue, Washington 98005
RE: EXAMPLE PHOTOGRAPHS - GROUNDWATER AND SOIL REMEDIATION
SYSTEM PROPOSED FOR 13435 INTERURBAN SOUTH IN TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON.
Dear Mr. Cross:
Environmental
Science &
Engineering, Inc.
Enclosed please find the photographs you requested during our telephone conversation of this
elate. The soil venting and groundwater remediation system pictured is similar to the system
proposed for 13435 Interurban Avenue South in Tukwila, Washington. Several differences will
exist between the Tukwila system and the one depicted.
• The concrete pad in Tukwila will be 20 feet by 20 feet rather than 20 by 25, as
shown.
• Slats in the fencing will be matched to the station building facing and /or fencing.
We understand that redwood slats will be appropriate.
• The gray oil /water separator and gray air compressor tank will not be utilized in
Tukwila. They will be replaced with a smaller bag filter system, electric control
box, and nvc piping from individual wells.
• The carbon canister shown may actually he replaced with several smaller
canisters. No canisters larger than the one shown in the photograph are expected
to be necessary.
• Razor wire is not expected to be required in Tukwila.
If necessary, the fenced enclosure may be roofed, with additional chain -link fencing and
redwood slats. We have another active system in Seattle which is somewhat more similar to the
proposed Tukwila system, but no photographs are currently available. Please..contact me if you
feel that pictures of that system might be more helpful. . 11";1r1:77 F
17411 N.E. Union Hill Road, Suite 220
�yr
Redmond, WA 98052 Phone (206) 869 -8220
1 . 1'11.4Y . 0 1 1992
CITY 01- I
PLAN NG
Fax (206) 867 -1366
�^
If i. can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to call me at (206) 869 -8220.
Sincerely,
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, INC;
Michael Meyer
Senior. Staff Geologist
j: \projccts \92 -7I \1.11:1.1,11-r
•
••
• 1992
flLA
• Y
. • .
fTEV<N .1. KATTN•R
Architect
April 9, 1992
Ms. Moira Bradshaw
Associate Planner
City of Tukwila
6300 Southcenter Blvd.
D.C.D. suite 100
Tukwila, WA 98188
Dear Ms. Bradshaw,
ROBERT H.
ARCHITECTURE
16110 140th AVENUE. N.E.
(SOS) 748 -4877
LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
PLANNING
• SUITE 1100
ENGINEERING
BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 88005
FAX (508) 748 -8838
NEM
APR 14 1992
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
RE: Supplemental application material for South Center Oil card -lock and retail fuel facility
at 13435 Interurban Ave. S.
Three items came up during the submittal of our proposal on March 30, 1992. First, we needed to
submit a map showing the extent of shoreline jurisdiction on our site. The second item was to
provide a roofing sample. The third item had to do with proposed landscape width along Interurban
Ave.
Attached are ten copies of an Assessor's Map showing extent of the 200 foot Shoreline Zone. If you
need them in a different amount or size please let me know.
The second item we discussed was the requirement to submit a roof sample. We have ordered a
roof shingle sample in "Slate Brown" from Mr. Nick Paz the local representative for Alcoa aluminum
shakes. Mr. Paz said we could have a roof sample in that specific color within a week.
I will deliver the roofing sample to the City as soon as it arrives. This particular roofing material is
non - flammable which is important in a fueling facility building material and the color is a medium
brown. The shingles are from the "country shingle" design with deep ridging. See attached brochure.
Note "General Architectural Specifications on back page."
The third item discussed was the width of our front yard landscaping. Our position is that the eight
feet of landscaping shown plus the four feet of sidewalk and landscaping at back of curb provide the
required ten feet of landscaping. Had the sidewalk been kept at the back of curb, our landscape
area would be twelve feet wide. We thought that the landscape width had been reviewed previously
with the Texaco submittal. The currently proposed front yard landscape area is wider than that
shown previously.
D
attachment
9067\reply
I will call you to find out who has been assigned to work on this proposal. Thank you for your
help. If you need additional materials or would like to discuss the project, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
ROBERT H. LEE AND ASSOCIATES, Inc.
Mark Cross
Senior Planner
ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES
1 V/7 i 11' IR . I/LII1i!VLL ! tiI14K1 -5
ROOFING MATERIAL
STEEL BUILDING
FASCIA TRIM
SOUTH CENTER OIL
ALCOA COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL
ALUMINUM ROOFING SYS "EMS
Alcoa Franchise Roofing
•
07310/ALC
Buy Line 0612
F
ALCOA
;.: ,.� ..
ii ? r�`r��
ret
Left:
Country Cedar Aluminum
Shakes, Collwood Park,
San Diego, California.
Curb Appeal Colors
Alcoa aluminum roofing
systems add real eye appeal to
your property. And they keep
their rich color, adding years
and years of beauty to the .
structure.
Country Cedar Shakes
• Musket Brown • White
• Villager Red • Slate Brown
• Charcoal Grey
HomeCrest
• Musket Brown • Dove White
• Terra Cotta • Slate Brown
• Charcoal Grey
mv "Alco roo fing products:
backed oy Tte'Al
v of America
onymous
with;q uality for: a : hiindred t ; ;
years:: A` name'more'consum-
ers know and trust
Tod we''re a worldwide `>
l eader in aluminum :an
materials techn
investing^ millions y in
research, development and
testing of our products to
determine proper warranty
p arameters
Ou "'roofing products com e
with a lifetime,*
non-prorated,:
transferable' l iimited warranty,
P ro v en n `P ance
Alcoa:roofi p roduct rfor s meet
orr surpass all majorbuilding .
code specifications; so they're
approved for use on your
structure.
The Alcoa aluminum roofing
line has all the
traditional code 1j . 1 `4
approvals. • `
Lower Life -Cycle
Costs
The first investment is the
last one made with an Alcoa
aluminum roof. And since
there are minimal mainte-
nance costs, these roofs will
continue to pay for thern-
selves, year after beautiful
year.
* If the property is owned by other that an individuals),
association, school, church, government or public entity
date of installation.
ALCOA TAKES STRENGTH';
Strength With
Staying Power
Protect your investment with
one of the most durable roofs
under the sun— Country
Cedar Aluminum Shakes or
1- lomeCrest Aluminum
Roofing by Alcoa.
Because they're made of
aluminum, Alcoa roofs
provide maximum strength
and peak protection, far
outperforming conventional
asphalt and wood roofs.
They'll never warp, split,
curl, rot or break, as wood,
asphalt, concrete or tile
products do. They won't rust
either. They stand up to the
sun's ultraviolet rays, heat,
fire, cold, rain, snow and hail,
even hurricane -force winds.
Resistant To The
Roughest Weather
AIco;r's unique four -way
locking ,vstem holds
( :auntie Cedar Aluminum
�Iikcs and f-IotneCrest
Alum intan Roofing panels
on ti.;hrly when the weather
gets mist
4
4410°
Alcoa's aluminum roofs are resistant to
almost anything Mother Nature cares to
dish out ezneme heat, cold, rain,
snow, hail and hurricane-force winds.
Lightweight Longevity
Other roofing materials And aluminum's light-
weigh up to 30 times more weight strength means
than Alcoa aluminum are still completely
roofing. That could cause walkable.
undue stress to structural
supports, which requires
special reinforcement.
But Alcoa roofs are very
light in weight —l- lomeCrest
is just 35 pounds. per 100
square feet; Country Cedar
Aluminum Shakes, just 50.
Their light weight and
durability make Alcoa
products perfect for
reroofing applications.
many cases, they can b
applied directly over at old
roof, eliminating a tear off,
and actually saving inc ney.
on
4
uch
the
11 Alcoa roofing products
.ire hacked by The Aluminurn.
c :ompany of America.—
\Icon. A name synonymous
\vith quality for a hundred •
years. A name more consum
ers know and trust.
Today, we're a worldwide
leader in aluminum and
materials technology —
investing millions yearly in
research, development and
resting of our products to
determine proper warranty
parameters.
Our roofing products come •
with a lifetime,* non - prorated
transferable limited warranty,
v
Ab
HomeCrest.Alumirium
Roofing, The Koihuiia
Plantation. Resort Poipu
Beach; Kauai,_HawaiL. •
1, By The Best Warranty
Proven Performance
. \ lc, roofing products meet
surpass all major building
code specifications, so they're
.lppr, wed for use on your
.trac ttlre.
Tie Alcoa aluminum roofing
Inn h,is all the
I r 1,111 ,nal code
T1 .\
_■ i\vcr Life -Cycle
l c 1 \IS
111 investment is the
i•1N1 , 'lie made with an Alcoa
VII imm roof. And since
11 1i•rc ,ire minimal mainte-
11.11Le costs, these roofs will
L in( ulue to pay for thenl-
Nels cs, year after beautiful
which is rated among the
best in the business: Alcoa
roofing products are even
warranted against leaks as a
result of perforations caused
by hail.
For additional information
or a free copy of the : war
ranty, contact Alcoa's
Customer Service Depart-
ment, P.O. Box 716, Sidney,
Ohio 45365
' If the property is owned by other that an individual(s), such as a corporation, unincorporated
association, school, church, government or public entity, the warranty is 35 years from the original
dote of installation.
Alcoa is the only manufac-
turer that provides an
exhaustive installation
training program for all
franchise dealers. And we
continue to update our
training program in our
4
Left
This multiple housing
unit withstands the
harsh Texas sun with
Country Cedar Aluminum
Shakes.
Below:
HomeCrest Aluminum
Roofing complements
the architechrre of this
150-year-old building.
Alcoa Franchise Dealers Are
Factory- Trained Installation Specialists
efforts to provide the most
thoroughly trained installa-
tion specialists in the
country.
Alcoa Franchise Roofing
ALCOA
,..• �µ
Country Cedar Aluminum Shakes AS12AL
Pc. /Ctn.: 25
Country Cedar Valley J- Channel V FLASHL
Size: 12' 1" long
Pc. /Ctn.:12
Country Cedar End Cap
Pc. /Cm.:100 left SECLL
Pc./Ctn.: 100 right SE(LR
Country Cedar Vertical Corner Cap CCVWL
Pc./On.: 50
Country Cedar Mansard Corner Cap Mal.
Pc. /Ctn.: 50
Country Cedar Hip Cap Ha
Pc. /Ctn.: 50
Country Cedar Ridge Cap RCL
Pc. /Ctn.: 50
Homeliest
Pc.
Homeliest
Pc.
Size:
Homeliest
Pc.
Size:
Home
Pc./(111.:
Size:
HomeCest
Pc.
Panel
/Ctn.: 32
ASO9AL
--
Trim Sheet TS24L
Size: 24" X 50'
1 RoII /Ctn.
Pop Rivets - Blind (White) BR1W
Pcs. /Box: 10 Bags of 100
Pcs. /Ctn.: 24 Boxes
Po Rivets - Blind (Brown) BR1
p
Pa. /Box: 10 Bags of 100
Pcs. /Ctn.: 24 Boxes
Roof Sealant (All Colors) XL200
Pc. /(tn.:10.10.3 FI. Oz.Tubes /Ctn.
Roof Sealant (Clear) XL250
Pc. /Ctn.:10. 10.3 FI. Oz.Tubes /(tn.
\� tlili
lke
u ' _
Valle HCVALLEY
Y
/Ctn.:10
10'
Open Valley OPVALLEY
/Ctn.:10
10'
(r
liest Drip Edge F9S3
rnC 24
12' 1"
Hip 8 Ridge Cap H(RCL
/Ctn.: 50
Country Cedar Starter Strip SSL
Size: 12' long
Pc. /Ctn.: 20
Country Cedar Drip Edge Fl 152E
Size: 12' 1" long
50
Country Cedar Wide J- Channel JS2L
Size: 12' 1" Long
Pc. /Ctn.: 20
a
General Architectural
I. Scope of Work
The work covered by this section shall Indude furnishing all: ki
materials and equipment necessary to completo'installation of: Alcoa
Country Cedar Aluminum Shake or Homeciestroofing'osouflined in this
specification and applicable drawings: Products to' be considered egiod
to those specified below must be approved in Ong bytbe architi'
prior to bid date.
H. Production Information
A. CATALOG (ODE —The ABP catalog codes covonng this s
are AS12AL (Country Cedar Aluminum'Shake for: siding or r
applications) andASO9Al (HomeCrestshingiesforroofingap diction
B. IDENTIFICATION—AS1 2A1 and ASO9ALshelj be packed in:curl
identified by the Alcoa logo and the words `Alcoa;Coun
Aluminum Shake or."Alcoa'Home(rest:,Roofzig" The
aluminum panels shall haven Id wash coat The A coo logq,
word "Alcoa" shall be stamped on every aluminum parcel; east
once the product has been installed
C. ALLOY AND TEMPER —All alummum panels and accessores
mode of . 3005-H25' :aluminum. sheet: (minimum ,tensile strength
26,000 psi; minimum yield ,strength 22;000'pst) or equivalent i
D. THICKNESS-All panels shall have a nomnal thickness of nine
• thousandths of an inch (0.019").'
E. PRODUCT DESIGN -Alcoa ponel fit. use in r
and light commercial appliiiations.with elevahons.ep to•30.feet.f.
applications of a different nature, contact Alcoa Buildin Products for
further details and information conceming`suitabil r
Alcoa Country Cedar Aluminum Shakes shall be panels
a nominal width of 12" and a nominal length of'48':`Eochpanel,shall
be formed into eight.indmduol simulated shakes of varying widths,
lengths and thicknesses. The difference in length of each •indm
shake provides for a staggered butt effect duplicating the random
overlap appearance of real cedar shake. The varrationin butt thickness
of the individual shakes on the panel produce a staggered three•
dimensional effect identical to that attained with real cedarshake The
• authenticity of the product shall also be enhanced by the deep rugged•
looking grain formed into each of the eight indmdual shakes
Panels shall be installed from left to right with hand end cats as
required to stagger the vertical joints between successive courses and
provide a random appearance. For weather protection io imitate a
joint between individual shakes, the panels shall be locked logetherby
engaging aformed lip on the left side of panels w thamodified U-shaped
water stop on the right side of the preceding panel. The concealed H
vertical lock hides the vertical joint, making it practically impossible to
visually determine the interlock between full panels, no matter what the
angle of sight. The panel shall have a continuous nailing flange to provide
for easy application and shall not require any clips for attachment
purposes. The top lock shall provide a continuous hooking lip for
engagement with the bottom of each panel or succeeding courses. This
type of snap-lock enables the panels to be installed like siding panels.
The shake con be used as either a sidewull, mansard or roofing • II
product, and detailed installation instructions are available showing the • A.
application of the shake and all related accessories. When installed as
a roofing product, the minimum acceptable roof pitch for Alcoa Country
ern rx .•,� :� -.
?t '.et .4 >:'�'
cif.4 !43 -Ir.. t
� F` lopt:
PikKL
��d'Lii? -ds 3us`7 14, ,f f
� R.•P�a �Y� c t ,` 1 �� :4t;- v- .:�.,: ^U*' b. ! y "5... `a .,�
3' �Y:ric - 7 �"'`t i•.n e * t`.'- .�crr.�": ?.• >ti�.
c '- " itl• SS`7,..""�,..,h'e: et. T 3s . } �t�z 1 ,
Aluminum Roofing and Accessories:
process b osstze mazailum paint p sioii ¢
Ttiefinrsl► ontheroofingponelsstieu�iwotagt,�
acrylic coating appwed rn n tvro-pluse"opriOn ` 4 (rtdud�s'
corrosion �rrldbrtrag prener and bak high rethrmxmce,a
coat Acrylic f inishes slid) be prerrzir(n guide toatirgg*ha
aMldy, indudup resistance to chertecat ahpospheres
chalking and fadaig, is excellent Tireyslrali be sure iiMji
doroblecoahngswhicharecapableoftakingtbeseverefa
to man o `produd such as ffre Acoa Country Cedar'
Homo(rest Ro For color avmiabihly, refer to torten
literature
NAI LS AN D FASTEN ERS -Koch shat l be Akoa akrrninum nods of 50
or 6110 algid( eitikaleat and havi " o tnirdmiiro feiisile'streiry
63,000 psi, or corrosiontesistontsteel naB having o shank:
of.074 inches end a head diometerof 112indr Allnadssfr,,,
a suitable etch finish to remove greases and.to'provide a minimum
.'3/4" of penetration, encludirig point, tnto.'a stud or.othersaPid roe
surface Alcoa Country Cedar Alummunr;Shake`con'olso
directly to plywood having a mimmum thickness of
I. Instollnfton;i'`';
Workmanshlp AppRiotion
1: Before s
<,t'.�':f� f't:i ....... .. �,�Y.�: ... —+. �::1•v:7�L ":iT,'r.:t;'.`:�Y;n
Transportation and Traffic Engineering
PLANNING• DESIGN
March 12, 1992
Mr. Jim Thorpe, President
South Center Oil
730 S Central
Kent, WA 98032
SUBJECT: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
TUKWILA CARD LOCK FUELING FACILITY
Dear Mr. Thorpe:
This letter summarizes the traffic impact analysis prepared for the proposed card lock fueling
facility on Interurban Avenue in Tukwila, Washington. The purpose of this analysis is to iden-
tify potential transportation - related impacts associated with development of the proposed pro-
ject and to identify measures that may be required to mitigate the project impacts.
Project Description
The proposed card lock fueling facility would be located on the west side of Interurban Avenue S
just south of I -5 (at 13435 Interurban Avenue S). Card lock facilities serve only subscribers of
the card lock service and do not serve the general public like a service station. The proposed
facility would have eight (8) fuel dispensers (pumps).
The site was previously occupied by a gas station /card lock facility/convenience market. The
gas station had five fuel pumps, and the convenience market was approximately 2.380 square
feet (si).
Trip Generation
Trip generation for the project was determined as the net increase between the proposed card
lock facility and the trip generation from the gas station /card lock facility/convenience market
that previously occupied the site. The trip generation values for these uses are defined below.
Trip Generation for a Card Lock Facility
Transpo
Group
TG: 92203.00
Trip generation for a new development is usually determined from rates and equations pro-
vided in Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). 5th Edition. The trip
generation rates and equations are relationships between a known characteristic of the
development (i.e., square footage, number of employees, number of fuel pumps. etc.) .and
the number of trips generated by the development. These relationships are determined
from vehicle trip surveys conducted at particular developments. Currently, no data is pro-
vided for card lock facilities in the trip generation manual.
To determine trip generation rates for this type of facility, customer transaction data at an
existing facility were collected. Since each customer transaction corresponds to two vehicle
trips (1 in, 1 out), trip generation can be estimated from the data. The following data were
collected from the existing card lock fueling facility at 730 S Central in Kent, Washington:
The TRANSPO Group, Inc. 14335 N.E. 24th Street. Suite 201 Bellevue. Washington 98007 FAX 206047-3688 206.'641.3881
Mr. Jim Thorpe, President
March 12. 1992
Page 2
The
Transpo
Group
• • Number of transactions per month for eight months from January 1991 to
August 1991 (the Kent facility was closed for construction from mid- September
1991 to mid -January 1992).
• Total number of transactions per day for five consecutive days
February 3, 1992, through Friday, February 7. 1992).
• Detail of transactions that occurred during the PM peak period between 3:00
and 6:00 p.m. for the five consecutive days in February. This information
included the date and time of the transaction and the type and amount of fuel
purchased.
To determine the PM peak hour and the corresponding number of vehicle trips for the Kent
facility, the transaction times were grouped into 15- minute periods. The number of trans-
actions for each 15- minute block was averaged over the 5 -day period. The peak hour was
determined to be from 3:45 to 4:45 p.m., and the peak hour trips were 24 (12 in, 12 out).
The daily trip generation was determined from averaging the total daily transactions over
the 5 -day period in February. The average number of transactions was 177, which rep-
resents 354 daily trips.
The percentage of trucks using the facility was also determined. Since card lock fueling
facilities are one of the few types of service stations that provide high quality diesel fuel,
there would likely be a greater than average number of trucks using this type of facility.
The number of trucks at the Kent facility was based on the number of transactions involv-
ing the purchase of diesel fuel. Only a small percentage of the diesel fuel purchases were
for less than 20 gallons. Therefore, all diesel fuel transactions were assumed to be large
trucks (semi - tractor trailer). Over the 5 -day period in February, approximately 14 percent
of the PM peak hour vehicle taps were trucks.
The daily and PM peak hour trips were adjusted to reflect monthly fluctuations in trips.
According to the breakdown of the monthly transactions, the lowest number of transactions
occurred in February (1.239 transactions), and the greatest number of transactions occurred
in August (1.584 transactions). The average number of transactions was 1.400 per month.
The transactions for February were adjusted to an average month using a multiplier of 1.13
(1,400/1,239). This multiplier was used to adjust the daily and PM peak hour trips.
In general. trip generation rates for a service station are based on the number of gasoline
pumps. There are 12 pumps at the Kent Card Lock Facility. To determine the trip genera-
tion rates for this facility, the adjusted daily and peak hour vehicle trips were divided by the
number of service pumps. The trip generation rates for a card lock facility are shown in
Table 1; complete trip data for the Kent facility are attached.
Table 1. Average Trip Generation Rates for Card Lock Facility - Trips per Pump
PM Peak Hour Trip Rate PM Peak Hour Truck Trip Rate
Daily
Trip Rate In Out Total In Out Total
Trips per Facility 400 14 14 28 2 2 4
Trips per Pump 33.33 1.11 1.11 222 0.17 0.17 0.34
Mr. Jim Thorpe, President
March 12, 1992
Page 3
Proposed Project Trip Generation
The proposed protect would be located on the site of an existing•service station /card lock
facility/convenience market. The net increase in project traffic was, therefore, determined
as the difference between the proposed and existing trip generation. The existing site trip
generation is based on average trip equations for service stations with convenience markets
in Trip Generation (ITE. 5th Edition, 1991). These equations are based on the size of the con-
venience market (2,380 sf). The proposed site trip generation was estimated using trip data
for a card lock facility summarized above. In order to evaluate the worst -case condition, the
number of trips per facility rather than per pump was used for the proposed project.
The net change in project - generated traffic is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Project Trip Generation
Land Use
PM Peak Hour
Daily In Out Total
A. Driveway Trips
Proposed
Card Lock Facility 400 14 14 28
with 8 Gas Punipsi
Existing
Service Station/Card Lock Facility/
Convenience Market 1 96 98 98 196
Net Change in Driveway Trips -1,560 -84 -84 -168
1 Trip generation rates based on survey of existing cans lock facility in Kent Washington.
2 Peak hour trips based on rates per Trip Generation, 5th Edition, 1991, for service stations with convenience market
(land use code 845). Daily trips based on k- factor for convenience markets (10 percent).
As shown above, the proposed facility would generate approximately 400 trips per day and
28 trips during the PM peak hour — significantly less traffic than the previous use. Of
these, it is estimated that there would be 56 truck trips per day and 4 truck trips during
the PM peak hour. Because the site would generate less traffic than the previous use, no
off-site analysis was performed for this project.
Site Access
Tr
Group
The proposed project would have two driveways on Interurban Avenue S, as shown on Figure 1.
The northernmost driveway would be approximately 125 feet south of the driveway to the Metro
Park -n -Ride lot and the on -ramp to northbound I -5. Interurban Avenue S is currently under
construction. A center, channelization island would be located approximately 60 feet south of
the northernmost site driveway and would restrict large vehicles from turning left from the site.
Therefore, it is recommended that a one -way circulation pattern be instituted for the site with
the southernmost driveway designated as "entrance only" and the northernmost driveway des-
Mr. Jim Thorpe. President
March 12. 1992
Page 4
ignated as "exit only." Because of the low volume of traffic generated by the site. there should
be minimal conflict between left turning vehicles entering the site and left turning vehicles exit-
ing the site. Entering left turns would not conflict with the center median.
The one -way circulation pattern would improve traffic operations on and off-site because of
the following:
• Reduced conflicts between vehicles exiting the Metro Park -n -Ride lot and vehi-
cles exiting the card lock facility since all traffic exiting the site would use the
southernmost driveway.
• Increased weaving distance between the site and the on -ramp to northbound I -5.
• Increased entering and exiting lane width of driveways for turning maneuvers.
• Reduced on -site conflicts caused by two - direction traffic.
Summary
The proposed Tukwila Card Lock Facility on Interurban Avenue S would generate a total of
400 daily trips and 28 PM peak hour trips. This is significantly less than the number of trips
generated by the service station /card lock /convenience market that previously occupied the
site. Therefore, no off -site mitigation would be needed to accommodate this project.
It is recommended that a one -way, counterclockwise circulation pattern be established for
the site. The northernmost driveway should be designated entrance only. and the south-
ernmost driveway should be designated exit only. The circulation pattern would improve
on and off -site traffic operations.
Please call me if you have any questions or comments regarding this analysis.
Very truly yours.
The TRANSPO Group. Inc.
-7)2 C. -1iu1....
Marna C. Heffron, P.E.
Transportation Engineer
MCH /mlm
Attachments
cc: Mr. Mark Cross, Robert H. Lee & Associates
1MC1(\922a3LR1
The
Tmnspo
Group
NB RAMP
TO I•S
SCHEMATIC DRAWING ONLY
APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1' a 40'
TUKWILA
CARD LOCK FACILITY
- -- • - ---
Suggested Circulation Pattern
J
Figure 1
PROJECT
SITE
INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH
Site Plan and Interurban Avenue S Plan
c )
c )
c
C )
A
I
Transpo
Group
92 203.00 3/11/92
TRIP GENERATION DATA
outh
Center
6 Oil, Inc.
February 23, 1992
Trip Generation Rates
January 1991
1,416
April 1991
1,358
July 1991
1,485
October 1991
Under Const.
January 1992
592 (Re- opened
February 3', 1992
February 4, 1992
February 5, 1992
February 6, 1992
February 7, 1992
Information attached
(206) 852 -2777
1- 800 -950 -3835
FAX (206) 854 -7936
Cardlock Fuel Stops
Number of transactions by month from
February 1991
1,239
May 1991
1,421
August 1991
1,584
November 1991
Under Const.
mid - month)
Total Number of transactions
175
166
174
187
183
730 South Central
P.O. Box 38
Kent, WA 98035
• Gasoline • Diesel
by day for
March 1991
1,314
June 1991
1,391
December 1991
Under Const.
C PACIFIC 1
PRIDE
�
INDEPENDENT FRANCHISEE
• Lubricants
January 1991 thru January 1992
September 1991
324 (Under Const.)
five consecutive days
Detail of transactions for peak hours 3:00pm thru 6:00pm for five
consecutive days.
MONDAY 2/3/92 TUESDAY 2/4/92 WEDNESDAY 2/5/92 THURSDAY 2/6/92 FRIDAY 2/7/92
WEEK AVERAGE
Vehldes Trucks
0 '/e
Time
Vehldes Trucks Vehldes Trucks Vehldes Trucks Vehldes Trucks Vehides Trucks
1 '✓e 0 'Ye 0 % 0 % 0 '/e
15:00
15 :15
15 :30
15 :45
16 :00
16:15
16:30
16:45
17:00
17:15
17:30
17:45
TOTAL
2 1 4 3 2 2 1 1
1 7 1 6 2 1 6 1
2 0 3 1 3 2
2 4 4 1 2 3
4 4 3 2 6 3 1
2 2 4 2 2 3
0 1 3 6 6
6 2 2 1 1 2 1
5 1 3 3 2
3 6 1 1 4 0
0 1 1 1 1 2
2 2 2 1 3 2
29 3 10% 34 8 24% 31 9 29% 29 5 17% 29 4 14%
1 0 ::0FlirF:FA7,E93:- 0 0 0
TRIP GENERATION DATA
CARD LOCK FUELING FACILITY • KENT, WASHINGTON
TRIP GENERATION FOR CARD LOCK FACILITY
703 S. Central, Kent, Washington
Daily
PM Peak Hour Trucks
In Out Total In Out Total
354 12 12 24 2 2 4
Note : There are 12 pumps at the Kent Card Lock Facility
AVERAGE MONTH TRIP GENERATION
(Adjusted using 1.13 mutiplier)
Daily PM Peak Hour Trucks
In Out Total In Out Total
400
13 13 27 2 2 4
TRIPGEN.XLS • 3/6/92
AVERAGE TRIP RATES FOR CARD LOCK FACILITY (per pump)
Dally
PM Peak Hour Trucks
In Out Total In Out Total
33.33 1.11 1.11 2.22 0.17 0.17 0.34
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: South Center Oil Card -lock Facility
2. Name of applicant: Mr. Jim Thorp, President, South Center Oil -
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: South Center Oil,
730 South Central Ave., Kent, WA 98032
4. Date checklist prepared: 3/27/92
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Control No.
Epic File No.
Fee44OO.00 Receipt No.
4226 .tea
5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Project could begin in August depending on review timing. Retail Kiosk may be constructed
as a second phase.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The applicant has designed
a project that can operate without an attendant. However the applicant does want to
have the flexability to have an attendant and operate more as a retail facility.
The retail kiosk and bathroom are shown on the plan. If phasing of the project is not allo
the applicant would like to build the entire project at once.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain. None
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal:,: '
Design Review, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, building permit, grading. .
permit, Air Quality permit.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page.. Section E requires a complete
description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be
summarized here.
The proposed project is to build an eight position fueling facility that is capable
of retail sales fom the 112 sq. ft. kiosk and bathroom and is equipert a ow
commercial customers to access fuel without an attendant. this is Known as a
Card Lock Facility. The facility would be open Z4 hrs a day. However any potential
retail sales from the Kiosk would be limited to the early evening hours.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location.of your proposed project, including a street address, if
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica-
tions related to this checklist.
The project address is 13435 Interurban Ave. This is located in the NW Quarter of
Section 14 Township 23 range 4 East. the site is bounded on three sides - by a
Metro Park and Ride Lot. Site was previously occupied by a Texaco retail food .
and fuel sales facility. That entire facility is in the process of being removed
and the site remediated.
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive?
The site is in the Interlake Design District. Property is zoned C
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat,
rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
Site is relatively flat but slopes to the west. Low
retaining walls surround site on Park and ride lot..
b. What is the steepest slope on the site ( approximate
percent slope)? 2% grade
c. What general types of soils are found on the site
(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland.
Unknown. No known prime farmland. Site was Texaco
Station
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
no
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti-
ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate
source of fill. Approximately 1,000 cubic yards.
Some filling is related to tanks and some to slope lot
for grss lined swale.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
limited potential due to flat condition. Minimum
amount of erosion could occurr.
g.
About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)? 78 % the rest is
landscaping. (22 %)
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2. Mr
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or
other impacts to the earth, if any: Hay bales around
storm drainage system. Temporary Erosion Control Plan
to he r2ripwed by City.
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from
the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Some dust will be generated during construction.
Some fuel vapors will be generated by filling
vehicles
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor
that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe. None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any:
Erosion and dust control durrinq construction.
Advanced Phase two vapor recovery equipment will
he installed to minimize fuel vapors leaving site.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including year -
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it flows into. Duwamish or Green River
is located approximately 150 feet to the east.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans. Yes. Project will include work
150 to 200 feet from river edge.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material
that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would' be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material.
1,000 Cubic yds. Material will come from off
site.
4) Will the proposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known. No. Storm water from onsite will
be routed through grass lined swale and oil water
separator befor release to existing storm drain in
south west corner of site.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan. No. Elevations of site existing and proposed are
shown. Survey shows existing grades and grade sheet
shows future grades. Road work by City on Interurban is raising
grades along east property line.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of
waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge. Soren drainage will be treated •
by use of oil /water separator and grass lined swale.
Drainage from under canopy will go to separate
oil /water separator and then to sanitary sewer.
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known. No.
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged
into the ground from septic tanks or other sour-
ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans
the system(s) are expected to serve. None.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into
other waters? If so, describe. There are two
separate storm drainage systems proposed. The runoff
from the driveslab under the canopy will be routed through
an oil water separator and then to the sanitary sewer.
The storm drainage from the rest of the be
routed through a grass lined swale and an oil /water
separator and then to existing storm drain. This system
goes eventually to the Green River.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface
waters? If so, generally describe. the
combination of grass lined swale and oil /water
separator is designed to minimize waste release.
Advanced double wall fuel tanks and spill monitoring
equipment will minimize possibility of spill to ground water.
•
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground; and runoff water impacts, if any: _
Sorm water from under canopy goes to separate oil /water
separator and then to sanitary sewer. Paved surfaces will
be treated by flowing through grass lined swale and
oil /water separator.
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the
site:
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
X shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed
or altered? Some shrubs located in existing planting areas
would be 'removed. Proposed plan includes extensive new plantings
along with grass areas for water quality purposes.
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on
or near the site. None
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other _
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any: Landscaping will cover 22% of site.
See attached landscape plan. This is an increase from the
approximate Ib% landscaping under the previous use.
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been
observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
songbirds
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
other:
none
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
none
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to
be on or near the site. None
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain. No site has been in commercial use for a
number UT interurban Ave. cum -This site from
actual river trontage.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,
if any:Increase landscaping and grassy areas. Add trees
see attached landscape plan.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
1
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,
wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether
it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Electrical energy will be used to pump fuel and
provide task and area lighting.
b. Would your project affect the . potential use of solar
energy'by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe. No
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any: Use energy efficient light fixtures.
Heat bathroom to 50 degrees only.
•
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,
including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe. This proposal includes two 22,000 gallon
fuel storage tanks.•These tanks will be devided into
three or four product compartments. Tanks and all
piping will be double wall construction. Only phase
two vapor recovery lines are single wall.
1) Describe special emergency services that might
be required. Fire Department, Ambulance.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ-
mental health hazards, if any:
Use double wall construction. include spill detection
and alarms. Emergency power shut off box.
Phase two vapor re covery system.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, other)?
There is a lot of background traffic noise from
Interurban Ave. and I -5.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created
by .or associated with the project on a short -
term or a long -term basis (for example: traf-
fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
what hours noise would come from the site.
There will be some vehicular noise as vehicles
enter and exit and start engines after fueling.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise
impacts, if any: Card -lock facility has fewer
ehicles comin. and •oin than the •revious
service station. No food sales on site. erefor,
noise from site should be reduced compared to
previous use.
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties? The site use is a vacant service station
that is in the process of demolition including
the old tanks and equipment. Surrounding use
is Park and Ride lot.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,
describe. No the previous use was a commercial fueling
facility and mini -mart.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
Empty service station building and canopy.
Tanks have been removed.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only.
No
d. Mill any structures be demolished? If so, what?
All existing structures are to bbe removed.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site? C-2
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation
of the site? Commercial
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site? According to Figure 3.7
on page 1 - 16 of Shnreline plan, our site is in the
"High Impact zone ".
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
i . Approximately how many people would reside or work
in the completed project?
1 or 2 part -time.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed
project displace? None
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce. displacement
impacts, if any: N/A
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com-
patible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any: landscaping perimeter areas. See site
plan fnr details. Propose full irrigation system
to maintain landscaping.
Evaluation for
. Agency Use Only
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income
housing? no1e
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli-
minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low -
income'housing. none
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any: none
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed
structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
The tallest structure is the canopy at 20 feet -6 in.
The pole sign is proposed at 20 feet.
Fxterinr huilding material for the canopy and retail
kiosk is steel.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be
altered or obstructed? None. New facility will have
underground power and phone lines. The canopy is
at or helow previous canopy height.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic
impacts, if any:
We are proposing brown as a dominate color. See bld.
elevations. All lighting will be screened from adjacent
properties. All new landscape plan including more
landscaping than previous use and new tree and shrub plantings.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal
mainly occur?
Canopy will
obsrur this lighting under canopy is important
for Safe fueling of vehicles.
produce? What time of day would it
.11 1 .
• 11 !I 1 • 1 • - . 1 0 8
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a
safety hazard or interfere with views?
No
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may
affect your proposal?
None.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare impacts, if any:
Shield all light fixtures to stay on site.
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational oppor-
tunities are in the immediate vicinity?
New pedestrian sidewalk along Interurban. Golf
Course to the south and east.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe.
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Coordinate driveway design and location with City.
C:nmmitt to north driveway as entrance only and the
_south driveway as exit only for better circulation
end less conflict with pedestrians.
-14-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro-
posed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If
so, generally describe. None
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on or next to the site.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if
any:
None
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed accss to the existing
street system. Show on site plans, if any.
This site is served by Interurban Ave.
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop?
PS
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project
have? How many would the project eliminate?
one parking spare in addition to eight fueling positions.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
No, we have coordinated on driveways and frontage improvements
with the City Interurban Ave. project.
e.
Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If
so, generally describe.
none in immediate vicinity.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur. Traffic study by Transpo
shows 400 ADT. • see attached study.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor-
tation impacts, if any:
Make the north driveway "entrance only" and the
southern "exit only ".
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so, generally describe. Should be lower than mini -
mart that previously occupied the site.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct
impacts on public services, if any.
Fuel sales usinLcommercial credit cards instead of
cash should reduce potential for crime
Well lighted fueling area deters crime.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service,
telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in
the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
The City of Tukwila would provide water and sewer
service. Puget Power would provide & ect'rical power.
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best of
my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is
relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Date Submitted:
PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only.
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIc'Mr
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS
The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the
objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the
aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information provides a general overall perspective of the
proposed action in the context of the environmental infor-
mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor-
tive information, studies, etc.
1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal?
Objective is to provide safe covered fueling for a wide
range of vehicles. It is also a project objective to be
able to operate without an attendant with automated
fuel sales and record keeping.
2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these
objectives? There are none. Using new double wall tanks
with electonic spill detection and computer record
keeping is most advances! way of fueling vehicles.
Alternate to new facility is that older facilities
provide service with . older tanks and detection
equipment. Also new phase two vapor control is more effective.
3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the
preferred course of action:
With the inherent concern with fuel storage and fueling
vehicles, it is important that_new facilities like this
carpi - lnrk are used rather than keeping alder facilities,
fnuhle wall tanks and piping combined with new leak
detertnrs make the new fueling facilities much safer than old.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
1
4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
•cies of the .Pla ? Nn. UsP is rnncistent.with plan
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are: 1 ant raping the perimeter 4dditinnal landsrapingg along
1. I . -.
of storm water Oil /water separators for storroiirainage
system
-23-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
CITY OF TUKWILA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Retail Fuel Facility designed for both
maned and unmaned operation.
2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub-
division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection)
13435 Interurban Avenue
Quarter: NW Section: 14 Township: 23 Range: 04
(This information may be found on your tax statement)
Mark Cross, Senior Planner
3. APPLICANT:* Name: ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Address: 1520 - 140th Avenue N.E., Suite 200, Bellevue, WA 98005
P one: (206) 746 -4677
Signature: Date: 3/26/92
* The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and
to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant.
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
Mr. Jim Thorp
4. PROPERTY Name: SOUTH CENTER OIL
OWNER
Phone: (206) 852 - 2777
BOARD OF ARC`' 'ECTURAL REVIEW
DESIG REVIEW
APPLICATION
6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188
Telephone: (206) 431 -3680
Address: 730 South Central Ave., Kent, WA 98032
I /WE,[signature(s)]
swear that I /we are the-owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved
in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this
application are true and correct to the
best ofmy/our knowledge and belief. Date: --F2. /4 2--
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC' ION i Page 2
CRITERIA
The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your proposed project.
Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each criterion (if appropriate), and describe how
your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient,
attach additional response to this form.
1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE
A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to
provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement.
B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual
impact of large paved areas.
C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site.
C
RESPONSE:
Q ?�
We have used a vesidetial roof line for the Fuel canopy. Landscaping plan
includes Evergreens to provide some year round buffer. Also we have reduced
impervious surface to make room for additional landscaping and grass lined
swale. The site will have much more landscaping than previous facility.
2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA
A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged.
B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided.
C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood
character.
D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of
safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged.
E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged.
RESPONSE:
We have made extra effort to have a very good landscape plan. We have used
a pitched "residential" roofline. Circulation has been made one way. (Enter
north driveway, exit south driveway) the improves vehicle circulation and
limits potential conflicts with pedestrians.
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
DESIGN REVIEW APPLIq,_ ION Page 3
3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT
A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they
should be recognized and preserved and enhanced.
B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and
provide an inviting and stable appearance.
C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important
axis, and provide shade.
D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic,
mitigating steps should be taken.
E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encour-
aged.
F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accom-
plished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be
effective in winter and summer.
G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and
pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used.
H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining land-
scape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the
building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive
brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided.
RESPONSE:
The main landscaping challenge was to design a planting layout that would
allow the incorporation of a grass lined Swale to meet water quality standards.
We think the plan from Mark Weisman and Associates does that.
Primary lighting for vehicle fueling comes from lights under the canopy. See
attached elevations.
Plantings have been coordinated with pedestrian sidewalks and plantings done
by Metro on surrounding property.
4. BUILDING DESIGN
A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its
design and relationship to surroundings.
B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring de-
velopments.
.BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC\ iON Page 4
C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good pro-
portions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be
consistent with anticipated life of the structure.
D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent.
E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be
screened from view.
F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all ex-
posed accessories should be harmonious with building design.
G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of
detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest.
RESPONSE:
The "T" shaped canopy with a pitched roof line will keep a "residential" look
to the proposal. Roofing will be dark to avoid brillant colors. Mechanical
Equipment will be inside the Retail /bathroom building.
The only bright colors will be on the freestanding sign. See attached.
The dumpster will be screened with wood fencing.
5. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE
A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architec-
tural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale
should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and
proportions should be to scale.
B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the
guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings.
RESPONSE:
Colors and materials will be coordinated on site. The dumpster will be
screened.
. . .BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC ION Page 5
INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT
The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area in order to manage
the development of this area, to upgrade its general appearance, to provide incentives for
compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize on the benefits to the area of the amenities including
the Green River and nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people -
oriented use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth. Please
describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this District. Use additional
response space, if necessary.
1. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area.
Site grading and filling are limited to keep to existing grades as much as
possible.
2. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment
of public recreational areas and facilities.
New pedestrian sidewalks and plantings have just been completed along entire
street frontage. Proposed use eliminates previous retail food sales.
3. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site pedestrian circu-
lation.
New pedestrian circulation along Interurban has been installed. Circulation
nn site from vehicles to retail Kiosk or bathroom is under well lighted
cann ily_
4. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complementary
to the district in which it is located.
We feel the use is compatible with adjacent park and ride lot and that the
pitched roof will be compatible with the residential use to the south and
west.
5. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse environmental im-
pacts.
Project proposal will decrease the paving from previous use. Increase the
landscaping and include upgraded water quality storm drainage system.
6. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features
in the area.
Roof line is compatible with the historical development pattern of the area.
-- k
—0—
SITE PLAN
.00 =
ttfnl`•7■4 . .
0.001 0.01. 0.100 —
---
r-e „.-t cow_ . _
OEM 0.0111
00104.11%.411
jiringZI.
/0.4001 001.
r ._.01010.4
1,1• WOK..
MO
‘,001.1. cc•dots.
our. 0.14 010110.• —
b
SI
.• •011.
‘00101 10
0.11104•111
•L 12.0
I
0 0 r .
:( e . 113 x WIlL
0
1 1, )
1 .... ,
I 0 0 1
0 I
__---- I.( U!0 CO
SCALD r-Ice—a r
0
INTERURBAN AVE. S.
_
tr WK. (•331.
MA. CA•
••• -•— 10 0
. • 04. 0J01:1 101
• 01.1.
141. tout
r 0011301
7
U
— (1)
ULV:r4f.:sor.1) "”-
testi.331x. 0111 (3010)
/
011.0,101
C00.00 404111*.
.101.0 coototult
01 t•VINSOL
N.G 3 W.' I 0•■• 13403.4
• • 01. PA.
.0 110 10 3•110
BID
•
134 M134 ••••pac.
AS—DUM
CILAWINDI MOM
r DATE APPROVED
CONSTRUCTION
A
LT DRA°
A
•°• V. ul • •••:?1171
..... ... .
• $0000 x.0
L.
.Dite
SOUTH CENTER OIL
31‘190TS
GENERAL NOTE:
110. IS 1,001.0011 110
0040.11.0 1•101.100
STE PLAN
61
(3435 INTERURBAN AVE. S. •
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON
SEAM 1 • 10*-0 OATE: 02/13/92
ORD.J.W. 01. O.J.W. H.E.S.
A-1
.3, 9067.10
C Ileteb1 Pe AI *Km.—
Ainer
Oboot WALE MIA 111100
P.V.1 FOLIC 1.41.
113.111 Pe, %
M.
e. %K. telab
NORTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
000
- 011.100. rao.).
Cm0C07 W.% •—•-•---•••-••
0.1.1 PK. 1.“ 100.1
00
N
, „.:„...„
,
MANNA ISOM. KNO
PERMIT
BID
CONSTRUCTION
be et et tea 0
0411 APPROVED
on.
AS-BUILY DRA111910
ROSCAT H. 1.11 ARSOCIATIS
P., reallebe{t SeOesi
SOUTH CENTER OIL
ELEVATIONS
f.
.039 9067.10
SUP: t/4 - 1-0
Pi. D.J.W. 01. D.J.W.
13435 INTERURDAN AVE. S.
1U9VOLA, WASHINGTON
OAR: 03/17/97
A-4
BIOFILTRATION SWALE
TING LANDSCAPING
'SIDEWALK'
r J r......._ —
a
/ Landscape Specifications I PLANT LEGEND
.... . .33
P W aw.a•.•a .r..a .fir I wra W
_.. 1.4.4 i
i 1 I ' a
~u .......... re.. ut •...•• P..3.... ( O ET-pp WI•nl•
r... drD iu� i N.w.uw.wr..
% •P. w•w •• � 1 �•• P...a �. a w... r••.
n • :; r ..r. -7..... a ' a r.. - a•ti I Y+t�Y rwu
1.s..eaa.. .wt.. u.... w.+. n. I b� C.I Maur P•1.•r. .• ^uwM tr..
u 1 r. «.r...,,..r w. ( D CO ) I . ;3.;.,w
w «. NP. w...me a•ad .• I..t M.�.r.
_ Y•wl•� *Of PO �( D CO )
N •` fa. as
_.. «ww.wr.ra..r H arr
4. . wtYr�
0 0D 001 >- =�C
Th
a
cc
aIY1Pl
f1.••a awl
O E.argr••n Tru Planting
♦l
P
�. .P. PKIr .m•.
.frr MA
win c.a.
WP..P MT
O Deciduous Tr*. Planting
q—
�. P a
/11N�D PlMllnp
µw[Y••Pu.6.
ral.n •..cam
In r CPR...a.Ca
flMn t •44
A.C. TRANSIT PARK & RIDE
SIDEWALK
INTERURBAN AVENUE
SCAM VOW
GENERAL NOTE.
ut U40.1100 •a0.30. S•1n.
Land16.a1 Naler
3.8 11.0•0 P•ra.Pa•wa.. omen Mr ••••• ins
w. rw.a....•a•. .r w tom aal. .w
AO
3 Iwo NanPUatm.. •aa• rd. a
.
Om. rS 033.1.0 ••••
f r.w.rw..O..waw•. r✓.a a...nP..a
2
0
r
Z la q
Q )- •
4 =a
2 w
O
U
2
W t..
r 2
6 , w
to c' 0 Z
W a w
Z a
W
U
2
1— W
, O � / � Z J
V/
1-
r_ W 1 • Y .
Y..
1 IC/ 3.12 at
`"• L 1
Irrigation Specifications
••••ussAn
t� 001..01• bMf90n 1YYn lfl &prosier1. kozaY0.
.own V.'1 oath wa.q W.. naw. .IP • le.M. A0.0.
.•pw.w I. •n, aal and Ito V AC. Mw, w w*Q•,.
coral Man m,noew b nw.l *nom w•. /.Ivd 2r He prang
.. r Manw rwl.. cop wd Mq
y
..• w( n
triM
7 -Sw.
1 1•
.7
1 M) r�u r
•
rr w• •= .
r r �i • . � r .. r•.. iw n
• �rr. .•owes v.r...r
y,•
1
A.C. TRANSIT PARK & RDE
_J
512.02.0
O Oct OID1
I
_ J
- - - � --f yL lllr -
PIA
INTERURBAN AVENUE
(.row.•... •••.r•r•■r.•..w..r.rr•r
Irrigation Leaend
.0 fl
0 0 w... ••••■r
a. la ...w .r•00
a
.. •vl
Moo r.nv
•1111 rowel
— 1 General Notes
11 Adp.l.. w 1 .••or• Mall le myrtle wanes w.v.W..nnr.n
1 0.ww.l. .12 no •l/f•4 .r .1 MaS M.01 r oan oat, p.••r
w..r
r) Lomon a1M/n0n ,.wrr...va, .12.0..29 wo wdr.upe
Amens., ""Y.sn02.9 fl pw.ry won Wes, Corp. n.•
b
�.v..� ■=•-■
512.0• 0
Appr PO C. w waived ..nb 1.,. n 210on and*
a ..•V. V.vl ra OW bob• yAw n..M.\b111,.Wnd V
n..i+r..Op. Irw.Vnb. 0 P.0 C• pa,w.wt NAM O••+•
1 ••n••.wN a re a•o•na•..
1) MM. b Inp.Ma /p•O•nr.M b.d.0W •p.w•wb.
r7'1 9 St✓.
' Yf1T `rr 7 1111101a ra.
r
r
x •
r 111111•1Ir
f .1h
• •
• :1.
0 ^0M.1 .1 Cr.w0lly.
Won' wiwt
•µ •w.WV M1n..n Y
Cy :Ms• 03.03
i c140,11.,1r.1w
TN W o; o01.4 CNr
• •1 ( *2. YAM I•.Y S
• S.
MMII O nmatI . 1 vA1. 9.
O W.,.t qn. V.A.
1••I 111
..--Ft „Tr.• V« wi•
igAgMritZt
I
1HF ww■.
•Wrf •r.wro w+•w.
111/ 11l..
wow w•n
INN S t0'
NORTH
.CALL 1•.I1/
•
t
0_ 56 1 •■•
1 1 • .10' 1 1
"" L 2
4
1.1.4{0 la 1.011
S.0 ONNITIC 0.10 CONNON ann. 00
MAI Cr CONStar rirt
ONCSIrr slANNITS
Li CAT. nIh 1.1. Tooforao TAM/••1.1.
- Cforta1.1111 or ICC • • 1.0101. 0.1001/
C.C. CONN. two o NICT1116.6
C.C. cam.. 0710 ( 1140..10
CI NTT 11. 1.1111
....
so-
'C o L T )
v v. '
.•••
3
••••
•••' •
••••.• 6, ..... • ••• 116
• 40•14•10•1
A C
AC
1 ::11{11 ••••• SIN
......
• Cos mi.
• ilusim NIT
I STORY E 1115 1196 et.mott.G,
..... m.o.N•
A C . TRANSIT PARR &RIDE
•
of.a.0 NM .... TV4M IND 7732•70•S TAM,
TO Or NY.
17 I lg.: • "0 1.40.• NAN.
O 11.11. rOLS
1-0
: 1MT rirC
•Unan ••1• • SISIL CMS. -- NM
IC - -111.0160t CoNSIT
1.116. T. - - 10.8•106•1 No6
A C
DIRT
” •.., „I 1 ,
r'S 1 TANK REMOVA L AREA)
... ..,' •
ri .... i i.•
, 1 / ,..
/
1.
...I.:. !Y .. Q. • ,,, . .." . /
, :I :: :
A ,..,.... ..
, --,-, ,
.
4
,
•
,,
.•""
• ---- e_J•
..-
• •,z
...'. •
f-I-t,V •
...• ,,,. 2 2 3 45 . V4' i
7
I
...
.... ... 4. „
...
AC
e •
••• •-,.. li .. 1. 1 • / ••••-•""""lartrt.lt="""
•
,::::.6., ...,..-• ‘ • .0
' :• vtIqii -
',,
/ ,, i"
, •-t,' 1,- • - - - •
• 1 ' r .;"""' 11 ---- .;MI.§::::
N-1 .,•••• '....... Srf '''''''. • ”000 • -- --,./ / /••,/ / / / e ,./ / /' / / / / 6.0 548 I 19 C _
." ---,' •
- ,--- 201 73 - . ..- - - 1....,, --- =.- 7 .:, PIA
2 ..., .
‘.,...‘11 ._ :, [ ,._ . - 1 11 ._ u „ 7. ...
''' .....
‘ •': , 1 i 11 :Tv% ...“.......41•41... AC .
.. ,..
• 1 '--- • 1 I
,11 I 1; '';',..••••••• \:: ,. :t: ::■ Z: : K' • -DIRT ------. ,,, - ,....,,...,.,..-,/ ,
,...,,D - ' ACCC .'
. • • - -.$ - - ...,,,
, ...•,-
,
.. .,,,,,,,...,. ,-.A.,,,,....t...-- , • ,-, ,...-„,,,,, , -..,- -
,,,, ..T. '.',.'d t.:-. \ f...-•' 1,---
S '•••••
-
1 ....
1 .4 .- I C
111.11 , ' • '10 Ie.
••'.. -, / 1 1
• • .
'•,..- ....at t," ,-----
(h
INTERURBAN r 4 ,.'" NI AVENUE t:
j
-- A
' C ANON.
NI. la
I I
■
( S . S. H. 2 M ). :Tiiiii :.
k
• ,
4
1111..1rdNI
:1116 MANS C•1 INNOTIN1
E IEDrININ MONIS MN ” Ia. IN. Ms, Nor al.
r olo. 11.:17: ICNI Moll IND, I /NT N.
:cm 0 .1.0 ft IN.01LO Ca1001.011 ar MTN..
Igt...• //AIL acx.1 Nt• ea .Is.
•=71.31.11 3.
. rt!
0111-b. ot MINN N 10 TN 00.11 or Too. NM..
▪ 1 110 INNIN ST 01010 ULU Col.. TO
.010 CON. Tal C../640C
1.1.0•110nal
. {1.0 " %11C . T.17r °" 14=2.■• •°" •tt 17T: ororollat=
▪ NNTI1101. •01.11 Nal. 1.11 06 ..... N•To ••• II rt.,
oN• OS USN NaT Or T. NIMILNT INN. MOM.
1.0 ANN fa, stn Le{
;of Of a ........ INCA Nal" OIST 0 CO•001 NV/ 1110 NNITI
1.101111110 • ”.11
NACU Mu •••
. ....... • NV. I• TS{ sa ....... CONI• Or NI,
1.1111.11a
Nuot.
NaNNIS• CAI NNI.
• M •100
::1±111,1114141
NAIN ”1-110
01016.1. NTT cumus1.01111
:•• Nut:r. !No.
rNOCI 11.110
ar ..... ••■••• mamma o• . roc
CL•140[1•4 aT Tot NI. G• curtanA• NON. 0 Of.. .....
1■001.1 ..... •IONal ” INT .............. 0.•
INN. 6100 10. 00 YOB
. t:7 . IT:I Mr r1:11 • :AT a ....
▪ 1/1.•• rag, TIONC {11., I”.•• CUT T•
0ID NOTNIST01.• rrIti 11:40.11400 lig
TN TUC INN Of •0111•0111
• 66.160To, Iss..A. 1600 vInva..... v. ..... N6
ION0 ..... 00M 000NIN N•
{40110.01110
•I C.1” INT M. NIVI
OTN• .11070” 10 00 .........
NIA, NOT 1.0 C•410•47•17/Y
1010 01. MN so& 0.1.. 1.1.111. OINCTO
JAM laC. 0010.•
111011
111” Nara. 06 tV01.0 aCCOSOIN TO TIC • • 0110011•11,
MINN. III STO•NT mu INA.. NIP. ..141•00, ISC..
01•111 . NTIO 1.11-
N MI 0011. 01 11L000 Itl0Ta 0 TOM C1.1001.
000 •• NON
1
J iM
1•2942
92 002 00
0
0
0 0
INTERURBAN AVE. S.
DRAWN IRIED rpN DATE APINDTm GRADING PLAN
PERMIT SOUTH CENTER OIL
810
CONSTRUCTION A
AS -BI1LT ORAWNO
R OROIT H. LSE • WOO ATES
0
RUMORS
Ifrif140
n.wn DRAM
..... 030.11.: �.._
Da&
r4,117,01 °Otgf rAar .•1.4111 SAM
SS/
AEj 9067.10
aNORTN
U435 INTERURBAN AVE. S.
TUNWLA. WASHINGTON
SCNL• I - 10' -0 GATT; 3/10/97
IE. C.O.H. OL O.J.W. APP. H.E.S.
G -1
4
WYI
Center
A Oil Inc.
w
PACIFIC
PRIDE -----
cCYMtr C•I rD[IIrG
i
.�..
SUPER 0.00 ?a
UNLEADED 0,00
REGULAR 0.00 •w
DIESEL 0.0015
,.. G
_____L:<'_ -_ -..
SIGN ELEVATION
- r.PL FOCI IGGC VCR
— r . r . l /a' tort to Mt.
.w4D G1nl MAf 3
r l0 4 mrCDfl -M Mim W
Art fl,w ; - 1-n-I[
m.i'r i•IYrwn Gun Of ..M1
3. 1 104n IC rW 11M1M g;
unn, ON 1 -M,aI IIG MID t0 FOIL
; How mow sown
to an un I-GG I-uu MtGtD
r� b nG Gro -1 rain ro ourl
nr wnl .m[ 0 -I/7 VON a Mwf
OEM WS.. MOM /AMOS
ANIA. MG `Pr
w,irw w .en •.•.
MOM CO. [ • • WI rIR[ --
r ..• MOO GPM
- - --
sD MS.. 0041. rnn ROC
raI r -V loc
0 . caa 1.710 NaaD
(N II SIM.rf CPi ..
PERMIT
BID
ELEVATION: CEDAR TRASH ENCLOSURE
rr
IMOD RWIi1M2 W .t rrf1Y -M
r
C OMr I ginlGh1C4 .1.
9% r -
f
1. `__.
I' r•
r -Y -
ELEVATION: CEDAR TRASH ENCLOSURE
DRAWINGS fsrlm 4. DATE AMAOYOJ
SOUTH CENTER OIL -
13435 INTERURUAN AVE. S.
TUNWILA, WASHINGTON
R[N901b
CONSTRUCTION A SOUL 1/2 -1 -0 DAIS 03/10/9:
V. D.J. W. OL D.J.W. APP. ILE,S.
AS -BULT DRAM NO
090
JOB) 0007.10
.2 NM 14441
[.nap.
O Everyun Tf.. Planting
T.4
trap. .r...w.
••=1 ...•, t «
wW_ •
Y . Nos
• . 1i. •i •ti , • •w • w--
1 Mr._MYiu. w.y . 1 •r wl w. lw• “I• Y .ry. _ sss
• •. .1•... Y•w � wr •r. W .•w r• • raw
. Yr. t•.1 ••• 31..M1. rwrw.i33331%
�+ =•.•"=.7::::•••• w.
•Yaw M4.• •'•w u r.ru ••••r. 1N wlw
• .a.•wv....•r wY.14•ww. r•wM
..yN i• n. r..• it •.n.
•.• ••.• � 1 w . r i. • . r il ~ ...• Y � "�
tr.; N Y•uw ^w�..riu �u� wn riM r�lHr1
t I .r.I...w... .�•
4ar
1, Ea
O U.cIduous Tr.. Planting
andscape Specifications
SAM MINI
om,
r orA
rns.ww
A.C. TRANSIT PARK IS RIDE
SIDEWALK
(
1
0 Do MED
INTERURBAN AVENUE
PLANT LEGENQ
SAM
ZgtOr
so. Comm
ry lWI= bolt•..,
0.r..•.
El Iwr.
1.w Y «....1.
,00 twat... H.
IM H. 144441s0,14 ea
.r1.r..Iru.
IM V
• wn .
It•..• w...
▪ •.it• opus W R M
..•• M~••r ••1w1
• wrrw. Yam .r
CC3CRAL 1101[.
WI 11.111 -] I•a .•.•[C. f» t•
Landau.. Hot..;
1 W••••.1.•••.••.r•Iw ww or w ow W.. Yr
1 ••www.•••.mr.u•w.. tan.•Inn•
V.•..1 •on.•
I I.w•s w...w...w•I w r.. w•• w. w •prat
. r.610 Y.. • rm•l uw ..• ••.ul
4 M+f rj.pd...wY.•Ywl•Mw.
h. . in. Y•w.w law Y•«•••..•w•.•.
LA 2-oo3o
A1R(M4Ag41" S
V ur 41114 ,
Y >R NOFITH _ ._
SCAM 1
a u1
2
0
Z
. )-
Q. =3
2
0
4
U
rc
w
< w
a'
LIJ i
n Q
Z Z
U
3 2
w
0 3 ' n
V)
6 e 1 31AW
1 a '1tao
" " L 1
r we., nn. -
- :: '/C
aK
SITE PLAN
"..-r roe can= LYU unwrt ara.6i---
u.ocm winpc to
a•.r ..I•r .nLL cu.V,. —
Y-3 • w• - wa .aa... -_
- .i. r L ,Y, r.n wart,
—
aY ...
-.Y ..M na
�I
SWIM. 3310
T v. m n m o
t ca.
ma .00 1033 013.103
,`� .• / . r•• T.
\\ / o+wu . m ° .u. Lr
r -.• ..r�r mac w.e c .
a pinlp
--
snu cYOr
}
w.i ga,rr.r
nom
.-I( 1
❑ ❑ -j-
1
!) 4.° n X O O —I
1
. • • t---
INTERURBAN AVE. S.
SCALE: 1
r Lw1Yr no
u -r
. e _F we faun cu. j
m
- -- - - ,r Mc ,ni
- r C. 31,303 MI tr03
T
0.3.1 n.n
1
— w 0.11) .I . It ,..M M1 —•
III (I ni)
falY�iYyi(.t i q in l rt4
-.- •ar.,oi nn .ua It n11
-- ITN.m.ei p131.103
_CAMidw00.
a.a C.on.
. -t 3 rr-r CO. 0.110 ,a. 10004
CAIO. 1Yr
x -0
PERWT
-1: "R-- - -- - -7
.x
BID
CONSTRUCTION
DOMINO NOM PM DATE APPMED
AS -HILT pUMp
ILO�OIT 1,. LII . A72f1 �—
nnt
�-_ —r arnm, naa
- -• I 0. f�ip•Ofl
un. RAW.
SOUTH CENTER OIL
RLNS106
_r0»-0.- t:
GENERAL NOTE:
OM MAR Ile 011.331
S)NO1H
Lq -003o
lw:
■1E PUN
T1.I(N1LA WASHINGTON
13135 INTERURBAN AVE. S
SCAM 1 - 10 -0 DAIL: 02 /13/92
A OR O.J.W. OL B.J.W. VP. H.E.S.
SAO
A—
IIDt 90.7.10
.• I'.I[l pIl T � rlAM T y I � [ �� 1I y 0 ��
j_M , . M _ - In...
11.1 P. I.q VW.
71141149/4 11e00 Maw
1 MM. MI T4 Wl lo I.11 vO --
mat mo. mac.
4'_r Milli MOW TU4t -•-n,
tl
M0u NT. runt _ -.. -.
n .l. rAOC r.a ITN
0 j/ /
NORTH ^ ELEVATION
==-_,
Alt
EAST ELEVATION
000
1�1� '.I : ' t I :'I t ! 1
1 1 1
• - -Kl. 11.T0400e1. ■.+11
C
00
O VMO TAI IM.L
A
a
Y
i
MAWS' =AID /09 DAR Ar9� D'TCT
PERl11T
BID
22}...•ii177
CON$1 CTON
Mtn i;,1i: .2,,221
T ORAMMO
1T01 rfOC 100. ION%
SOUTH CENTER OIL
TV ury PT.JT4.Tul.
Lae -OV3o
AIWA +ENr C
C1VAT1011f
1UKMILA, WASMINOTON
13 l •
9067.10
13435 191091.1ROAN AVE. 5.
SCALD 1/4 - 1 —0 OAS' 03/17/9
C. D.J.W. 01. O.J.W. AA. - --
A -4
•
e "WS ■Aan /WIC POW WM
P.I:=Z14,01 *Al Era
• Iftl111/0.1
1
,
gi
- • 4 MM. NMI MP< MX W. 00.11 ..--...,_ /.
ri:
ra•Ot MIX Mit MOM
all
Mil - 1
•-0 Wt.& 14.10.4
Mita VIVCTIt L ■Mi .
MO. Mk
ll
W-e .4111
: I .
NORTH ELEVATION
EAST ELEVATION
101
1
101
t I
1
• ; . ! :1: •
000
ONASYNNI IRMO 7019
BID
•• ........ los
CONSTRUCTION
AS—Wit DRAWING
OATS
APPOOVCD
•■•
iff ?"AgretATES
SOUTH CENTER OIL
109901S
01 CT pWflMfl V4.•1 VOLL
A
A va4MRi r F
Lq2.-coo
ELEVATORS
13435 INTERURBAN AVE. S.
1117911A, WASHINGTON
SAE 1/4 1-0 01111 03/17/92
s..
JCS4 9067.10
A-4
■•■
— C41,01 wwwes
rt was wow/
00
•17v14-
, N4:1 -ne
/00. 0/
(0 0 . 01
/00.01
100.01
Z., Z
U 1/5
C/6.3
/99,03
)50.18
C1203
3e.s,z.e
175.10
0 D35.34 3
0 °C) 'C; N "
t..0" tiq: 181
• ,4,6 • ,16
° c,‘
ge •
105. BI Hz
e,ea ca• zt13. ;4
s ?t .
166TH ST.
220.1 •
I0
.3/7
9
8204130367
a 0 0
5/
ct
LoT Z
0
G 6
• 85
i5
0
1 /6'
7 / 5 0
lJ
-10
o
0
6 "
0
cc o
no_ a712.1tos75
bl -7
"
$0. iP ,o10„n 18
14.1 ok"-
(0 4 )- - • ql. oso
05 80.7 8
ro., "••■■
2
0
N
10