Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L92-0038 - C & M PROPERTIES - RIVERTON LOTS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS)l92-0038 13041 40th avenue south cancelled c and m properties ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) Therefore, we are equesting that below for the $ fee paid. Name Address Approved: cc: Project file Nadine Morgan City of Tukwila Department of Community Development M E M O R A N D U M Alan Doerschel, Finance Director Ann Siegenthaler, Assistant Planner Department of Community Developmen REFUND FOR SEPA CHECKLIST -- Nadine Morgan July 6, 1992 Ms. Nadine Morgan C & M PROPERTIES 5190 South 166th Tukwila, WA 98188 I A 14 Amp Pace, Senior Planner Date: On May 14, 1992, Nadine Morgan paid by check the $225 fee for SEPA Environmental Impact Statement checklist #L92 -0038. The checklist was required due to the fact that proposed development on her property, 13041 40th Avenue South, involved Critical Area Sensitive Areas However, based on a subsequent development proposal and survey, DCD will not require the SEPA checklist. a refund be given to the applicant Traz t # /Permit # /Date # 8.094 - 32/ #L92- 0038/5 -12 -92 Thank you. Please let me know if you have any questions on this. John W Rants, Mayor Rick Beeler, Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431 4. Date checklist prepared: 5%11/92 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila Contr. No. Epic File No. 4,9, Fee -$ 499-@9 Receipt No ..34 .s , 1 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Riverton Lots F TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. 2. Name of applicant: C & M Properties, Inc. MAY 14 1992 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:5190 South 166th, Tukwila WA 98188; 243 - 0900; Nadine Morgan 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction completed 6 nonthc aftor application 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The City of Tukwila plans a street improvement project on 40th and 42nd Avenue South in a 1993 or later time frame. In connection with this project, the City has performed soil testing and other related studies. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None, except for above street improvement project. • 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Only standard building, electrical, mechanical and other permits are required. • • . - I I • .- - . • -existing buildings. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. proposal is to plat almost an acre of land into 4 single family parcels and oonctruet— s— homeS—on —tee p arccl3 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. The proposal is located at a current address of 13041 40th Avenue South, a short distance from the old commercial area of the original Riverton town site. Survey and vicinity maps are submitted elsewhere with this application. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No. . TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICI_ B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth - a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Flat, except for driveway connecting to 40th Ave So. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? App GO pct on driveway edge. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. C cla lo d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. The road cut created by King County has had surface slippage. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of f i l l . The driveway and future roadway will • the driveway will be used to smnnth anri level the hark portion of the property. Tt i s anti nLipated that no fill .Will be hrnu•ht in except for rock under the road_ f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. ____122,_parlijsallarly along the road. Temporary erosion control measures will include Reeding exposed areas with perennial ryPgrgss and a strRw mulch. The entranee will he graded to make the Glripe more gradual. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 29.E %, including the private road. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2. Air 3. Water a. Surface: h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Exposed areas around the construction sites will be seeded with perennial ryegrass, assuming construction is not completed before the next rainy season. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some diesel emissions and dust will occur due to._ b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None are known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. A portion of Southgate Creek runs approximQt . 110' from the Southwest corner of Lot LL. Evaluation for Agency Use Only waters. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Construction of the homes on Lots 3 and )a bre within 200 1 of the creek. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would' be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill or dredge material will be brought to the site, except in the driveway area. No soils will be removed from the site, although soils will be mauidtaround on the site for leveling purposes. , 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. The proposal will require surface water diversion. See Storm Drainage and utilities plan profile map. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No waste materials of significance will be discharged to surface Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. No significant waste materials will_he_dis_ charged int& the ground. The area is served by sewer and the homes will be connected thereto._ c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Runoff will percolate inibb the ground. Provision is made via a detention.p .- abnormally y_l arg mounts oL storm water flow. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. All waste materials used during construction will be recycled or disposed of properly. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: See Storm Drainage and Utilities Plan Profile included with this package. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, •en, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be or altered? Field g and _weed growth will be remnmed - ThP si nglP pine tree on the site in_diseased and will Algo bp removed. removed _�. . - . 5 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None Known_ s Evaluation for Agency Use Only M1d 5. Animals d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:_l_o_be dRtermined by homeowners. a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. N d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: f cOmT_eti_on of constri b aste —landscaping vi 11 l,aa 1nrg 1y native trP!?s and shrubs. Evaluation for Agency Use Only L ;: 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. NatItral gas will he_used for heating, hot water, cooking. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. N . c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The us.e_ of south facing windows will allow for capture of heat frnm_sunl i ght. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. N one ontsi 1e of normal construction t we are aware of. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None known. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: paints and finishing sol vants vial by rAm(1vAd from the 0110 - .$ • . ..c - • ti Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise ^.. .. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The two existing gtruatunes the operty he demolished e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? 13-1.7200 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? &_1.72Ag If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A g. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. City maps show ,he NE corner to be in_an., environmentally sensitive area because of the steep slope oreated by the voila mit on both ore, $o_ Tinvaver, the snrvPy _ shows 100% of this to he on city property_ i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? An average of 4 pemple_per hnusA (1S_people_estimatei). Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? gone The houae is not hahitable.. j. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: NSA Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? le- fiuni1 - residences. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if. any: None_ 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 22feet; wood siding b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed ? -ui.ews- +he north c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Cnnstruatinn at and si%e of restlennes will fit into existing neighborhood housing stoPk - �,;�1 .. .... ,�:.'.:, Wit'. :C,";C3;C'�;�� ".��` . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None of significance. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? no. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Tukwila Community Center is a short distance to the east. Undeveloped Southgate Park is a short walk to the south. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 14. Transportation 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None_ b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The private road accesses 40th Avenue _south. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The property is served by Metro Route 12h. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project will have 7 garage spaces plus driveway parking available. No spaces will be eliminated. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). A 197 font private road will access 40th ,Agenue So. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. At 2 vPhieies per house, a,,.,rox mate l y 1 h tr; nG per ri s y may he generated by tho project. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. None be.ond what already exist b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 16. Utilities C. Signature Gables Televis,nn PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. a. C' ities a ailable —thP site• , efuse service,,. septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. See 16a. above, Seattle Cityjight, Washington Natural Gas, Water District 125 and Val Vue Sewer District provide the major services. The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its . decision. Signature: / / / -ot'�r . Date Submitted: 51/ t; Evaluation for Agency Use Only xrn. varr..: �.,muzr�zrss,.:xvcc.:sC.Y -�:!'. iYJ'•� a�:1::'�`.1�S�t; < TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC& - D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment: When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Ry creating li new residences where—there were previously only 2 buildings, sewer discharge is presumably rtuhlerl _ In addition, adrli ti Anal auto traffic will he g nerateri _ Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: • _ standards and surfane water runoff will be dealt with in n better manner than exists anywhere in the neighborhood. I•u • - • • - I •,- 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? No gffect known Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are:None. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Thp prnpos1 innrea.ag the numhar of • - It SO ..u require gui ii +.i oral power, etc. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? It would not. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None. 5. How would the proposal be likely, to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? It will not. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: None. How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? Not applicable. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? See #3 above. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None, except to construct to current building and energy codes. 7. ` Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict . with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. None known. . � ..... . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3 1:'of �". oi.. k. � i^( aw i3o' iwd. ISMJ.i'+. H.PY.V.; 4! 7? fSr,+ eoxwrnv .+.z.rtw.z:r....st- a.vws�+r -w. worse:.. e. ns za. ncrwa. nr.«.+:.,,......,. .,,...rnarra.w.x 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: N/A Evaluation for Agency Use Only nm..tis :.s:arras rR !M•a ns'aPtAnit- }.t "Bg.f`r.".: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICRL - Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the <vforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? TO build h affnrriahl e homes for use as single family dwellings. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? None. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: N/9 :'::,:f.dih5.i.":.ti k: - ...g 3•21Zai:'!N'tliikariili. 1 �x:?.A..›..11•WiffPlr:sr :A1 »1';Z.;....Y a "r,7 ) zusra: swvxs .r.�uu,K�.,.ia:savx:.e'c:rss:. t., �. s", c. F:azurt °e+;xa�ir.<z. Derr, t!'! N�aa�k�:¢ ntdr.>_ s. tl; wv, t5�". ymrai�nnaxw, naat: r.+ a�e; e+. armr: rut�+ t'..; i::.'a'�`aM - . r . , 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila • Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? N the proposal enmplementa it. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: !i -23- Evaluation for Agency Use Only k * * * *** *k * ** ********************* * * * * * ***Jr** ****k*Jr* * *k*** ** **k CITY OF TUKWILA, WA TRANSMIT ****** k*************** *** *** * * * ******k* * * * * * * * * ****** **fir* * * ****k TRANSMIT Number: 92000432 Amount: 225.00 05/1.2/92 16:28 Permit No: L92 -0038 Type: P• -SEPA STATE ENVIR aTkpT Parcel No: 734060 -0903 Site Address: 13041 40 AV S Location: NW 15 -23 -4 Payment Method: CHECK Notation: C & M PROPERTIES Init: DLM * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ** * * * * ** * * ** * * * *** *• ** * * ** tr* ** * ** * * * ** *fir * * **•k *** * Account Code 000/345.831 Total Fees: Total All Payments: Balance: Description SEPA Total (This Payment): 225.00 223.00 .00 Paid 225.00 225.00 GENERA 225.00 TOTAL 225.00 CHECK; 225.00 CMA� ti� 0.00 15 :34 SCALE: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR: C & M PROPERTIES. INC. THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF TRS;CT.55. RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS •