Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 91-02-SMP - CITY OF TUKWILA - LEVEE SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENTPermit 91-02-SMP - CITY OF TUKWILA - LEVEE SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT 91-2-SMP GREEN RIVER DIKE EPIC-42-90 cc: Bob Giberson Jack Pace DATE: June 10, 1992 M E M O R A N D U M T O F I L E FILE: Corps Levee Project: Shorelines Permit X91 -2 -SMP FROM: Ann Siegenthaler Department of Community Development RE: Addition of gabion wall - amendment to permit As requested by Bob Giberson of Public Works per his memo to Jack Pace 5/11/92, the above Shorelines Permit is hereby amended as follows: Permit includes a 9-foot gabion wall (has been constructed as of this date) along Christensen Road, between back of sidewalk and riverbank. At a time appropriate to ensure vegetation establishment, . but not later than February 28, 19 9 3 the gabion wall area will be re- vegetated as follows: 1. Fill voids with crushed rock, over entire wall. 2. Spread 4 " -6" topsoil over entire wall. 3. Hydroseed entire wall in "natural" grass mix. 4. Plant willow stakes at base of gabion wall and on first tier only; plant at 4 feet on center single file. Note: Entire wall is to be covered with crushed rock and topsoil. This differs slightly from Public Works' request that only lower tiers would have crushed rock and topsoil. This amendment is based on discussions between Public Works (Cameron & Giberson) and DCD (Pace & Siegenthaler), site inspections, Giberson memo of 5/11/92, and Tukwila Shorelines policies and regulations. See file for notes on these inspections and meetings. f /cam Yozh �,��. � 1. CF: Ron Cameron FILE: 84- RW41 -6 City of Tukwila Department of Public Works M E M O R A N D U M DATE: May 11, 1992 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Jack Pace, Senior Planner Bob Giberson, Senior Engineer Christensen Road Improvements Shorelines Permit #91 -2 -SMP We hereby request that the Shorelines Permit be modified to reflect the 9 foot high gabion wall. Because of the change of 1 foot in the Corps of Engineers flood elevation and limited right -of -way, the gabion wall had to be redesigned from a 3 foot high gabion wall to a 9 foot high wall. As part of our construction we will do the following work this fall (September thru November): Spread crushed rock on lower tiers of gabion wall to fill voids in order to hold topsoil. 2. Spread topsoil on lower tiers of gabion wall, 4 " -6" average depth. 3. Plant willow stakes out from base of gabion wall on 4 foot centers in a triangular pattern, and on the first tier on 4 foot centers in a single file. 4. Hydroseed all over to match natural grass area along shore. This revegetation scope of work is based on discussions with Ann Siegenthaler and represents a balance between alternatives. Plan details are attached for your reference. Thanks for your assistance in this matter. John W. Rants, Mayor Ross A. Earnst, P. E., Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: (206) 433 - 0179 • Fax (206) 431 G D ROCK -T- F ILLF.R) 0 0 Vase se • 0 MELO • -0.400.1.1 r ,cm,OLOS O • • • amt. Iwo ewe � * 4-6 ■ poi &. Live ty ;pule Y ro 0P5011., U N6 C ' e 1.5' 3' r/ll=/l/ =lli / /i= / /= / / /= ;/1 —1 //- 6' GABON RETAINING WALL & RAILING STA. 55 +95. 24' LT. TO STA. 59+ 10. 24' LT. 316LF 7 — 2' GALVANIZED 0.D. STEEL PIPE RAIUNG W /WELDED JOINTS GALV. IN —\ CONFORMANCE TO ASTM A 123 � GROUT 2 1 /4' I.D. 6 GA. GALV. RAILING SLEEVE EX1S71NG g UNE 10 cy 30 Cy /-7/// GEOTEX11LE 1.5' . FABRIC CONCRETE CLASS 3000 W 1 -Low S C' # ) C (✓t/S ff el) R4Ck To PS) 12- 6 5p NV PR.) s cep 240 (7.$ $160° Er 10 ( 2q -cc) -- #Zoo 30 ( 3o • 6o) = #'goo boo o•(o.,o) = 4 600 41500 (oy- ti-,00) QC CUTTING AND PLANTING 1. SELECT HEALTHY WILLOWS IN THE LATE WINTER OR EARLY SPRING WHEN THE PLANTS ARE STILL DORMANT. KEEP THE CUTTINGS COOLS AND MOIST -- PLANT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER CUTTING. WITHIN 24 HRS. 3. PUNCH A SMALL HOLE INTO THE BARE EXPOSED STREAM BANK ABOUT 14" DEEP WITH A PLANTING BAR. 4. GENTLY PUSH CUTTING INTO THE BOTTOM OF THE HOLE. 5. TAMP SOIL FIRMLY AROUND THE CUTTING. 18" • DIP TOP 2" IN NON TOXIC WHITE LATEX PAINT I /4 "TO 1/2" DIAMETER WOOD USE A. SHARP CUTTING TOOL CUT ONE -YEAR OLD WOOD AT A SLIGHT ANGLE TYPICAL WILLOW CUTTING TO: Ron Cameron FROM: RE: ( City of Tukwila cc: Ann Siegenthaler Slirel'i'nes 'file 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 The original Shorelines Permit included Christensen Road as an (south of 1 -405 to Frager Road). any approvals of the actual work wall in that area. M E M O R A N D U M Rick Beeler Shorelines Permit #91- 2 -SMP: DATE: April 2, 1992 As a result, the gabion wall along Christensen has been installed in violation of the project Shorelines Permit. More importantly, the gabion wall is not consistent with our Shorelines regulations, which require re- vegetation of all disturbed areas of shoreline. This situation can be remedied as follows: 1) The Shorelines Permit needs memo from Public Works which project, and with supporting 2) The gabion wall needs to be extent possible, with groundcover. for the Green River levee, project area where the levee would be raised However, the permit did not include along Christensen Road nor of a gabion to be amended with a briefly describes the drawings. re- vegetated, to the trees, shrubs and I believe Ann has had some discussions with Bob Giberson on re- vegetation alternatives. If we can be of further help, please let us know; we need to resolve this as soon as possible. Phone: (206) 433 -1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 433 -1833 John W. Rants, Mayor Christensen Road gabion wall ceixturtini 24 rm. 41-2.--9vt? 11-2-5MP M E M O R A N D U M T O F I L E FILE: 91- 2 -SMP: CORPS 205 LEVEE PROJECT DATE: January 30, 1992 PREP: Ann Siegenthaler, Assistant Planner 2. Slopes not hydroseeded. Topsoil not in. cc: Ron Cameron Don Williams Site inspection on January 30, 1992 of the above project, with Don Williams and Ron Cameron. Noted the following: 1. Ramps not handicapped accessible: too steep, and widths of some ramps (e.g. at P -17 "shelf ") not 4' wide. Ramp at F & N Picnic Area not fixed to 8% as requested of Gilbrough. Looks like it might be as steep as 20 %. (Ramp at Strander was previously measured at 14 %). Per Don, not all ramps need be handicapped accessible. Ron will look at slopes /widths of ramps & make arrangements for re- grading where possible. 2. Drainage at City Shops picnic "triangle" needs re- working. Oak tree surrounded by standing water; could kill tree. 4. Edge of levee at Koll Office' Park needs finishing; is mud hole. Need curbing between sod area and asphalt drive; need additional sod in bare areas. 3. Bollards needed at levee access drives at a) Railroad and b) Koll Office Park. 3. Some shrubs (dogwood) in at 34 +5 to 36 +5, and 75 +0 to 76 +5. MEMORANDUM TO F IL'E FILE: 91- 2 -SMP: CORPS 205 LEVEE PROJECT DATE:. January 20, 1992 PREP: Ann Siegenthaler, Assistant Planner I conducted ariinspection on January 20, 1992 of the above project. Noted the following: 1. Ramps not handicapped accessible. Ramp at Strander (not as steep as many) measured at 14 %. Ramp at F & N picnic area not fixed as requested of Gilbrough. Looks like it might be as steep as 20 %. 2. Slopes not hydroseeded. Topsoil not in. 3. Some shrubs in; some trees guyed. Future inspection arranged with Ron & Don. FILE: 91- 2 -SMP: CORPS 205 LEVEE PROJECT DATE: December 30, 1991 PREP: Ann Siegenthaler, Assistant Planner M E M O R A N D U M T O F I L E The above permit was issued in March 1991. Subsequently, several changes in the project became necessary, due to required adjustments in levee location and elevation. The purpose of this memo is to clarify revisions to, and amend the original permit. The Shorelines Permit for the above project is amended and clarified as follows: 1. The finish elevation of the levee will be 2 to 5 feet above existing grade. Impacts of this additional fill on existing recreation areas and existing trees are addressed below. 2. All (except two) of the existing maple trees between Stations 73 and 85 (along Costco) have been transplanted to other locations on the levee. 3. Three trees have been removed; two other trees appear to be lost due to damage during transplanting. 4. Tree replacement /landscape enhancement of the shorelines will consist of: a) hydroseeding of all exposed slopes (by Corps); b) planting of 38 trees (30 by Army Corps, 8 by City); c) planting of 100 shrubs (by City). Plants will be provided by the Corps. Based on availability of plants and public safety issues, plants will be a mix of native and non - native species. Planting /hydroseeding will be completed no later than March 1992. Exposed areas will be hydroseeded according to BMP. Areas where seed does not become established will be re- seeded as soon as possible. Corps Levee 205 Shorelines Permit revisions, 12/30/91 Page 2 5. Public Works will be responsible for a minimum of three inspections to ensure project compliance with Shorelines Permit: 1. immediately following planting and hydroseeding; 2. after 1 year; 3. after 2 years. 6. Public Works Department will implement a two -year monitoring program for existing and new trees along the levee. Dead or dying trees will be replaced within this time period. (Future tree maintenance will be undertaken by the Parks Department.) 7. All existing and identified future picnic areas /waysides will be handicapped accessible. This will involve re- grading of levee banks and construction of ramp(s) in these areas. 8. P -17 Picnic Area will be diminished by levee construction. However, Station 87 Picnic Area (Fredrick & Nelsen) will be enlarged and enhanced. Don Williams has agreed to treatment of levee bank at picnic area with Cintrex, vs. groundcover or grass. 9. To minimize maintenance problems, levee banks will be finish - graded with gradual slopes wherever possible. These revisions have been reviewed, discussed and agreed to by Public Works and Parks, and by the Army Corps of Engineers (Noel Gilbrough). cc: Ron Cameron, City Engineer Don Williams, Director Parks & Recreation -- DIZ(6I1 A 1L t) 30 - n2c (' u ct"Y3 i . ) -Y2 P IA v- rzF-14-1_5 A _- e �j "T" l l� Vv L� U E —Ft) ( Y .f DZl 4.c, 34'¢ (.._43 cA - n ( ST A fCE N i I is t o A- 1) 5-0 5 Ocl_ PI LED ei Elk tN1 Stop 11 c') F (tJ K_w t LA- vz. - E& S O I L /1/444- -4. N "'D c c ry M C (T'1 T1 t,J al S A(Z_E 13.e a- - f' Y3 't. u). f (NJ 6- 5'T A-1 - I trkt t.� N'jfl L rtL,4 (N YZi4t'j !s- V NTl L P LA-yc 1 M Ta-- S N✓�- eJ c S'7� K cN G/ 51 A I G-t 1 TEN/ it 1 F RA , k) 1 IU c„ - rig E o r r(ZA-XImUS is { -5 ELu A 'z- y tsUrz USE 3 F2A N U 5 \ LA�vI t -t.0 o f IlAGE o f �cri) LA ( _ en tr o c„4 H i' 4-( L El L cr ) 4r2E y9 5 tuft Ll. �u ac S E M DAB S M4 )C. C] a off Si1'E Wl IN / ^2 oC . \ 01 HI No 4.11 eh © SrXZ. 2/,'4401-tir„ea4:- ed, 11)14a t etra . 6 : 44 4 1 At (64" /.; ca.m.) 2 5TH+ 3 y4.5d &Lt.& jacrAyorionil / 3 4/2" /o'd2'or) or 9ccz r a4'ud l .UM Zt 2 Ca 6e-eige m iG) No A ,• S a c c c apalust.... 2 2'f t' (rni'- Ash) s r , 39+ 00- Yi Sao 6•9me As uE ( ) 5774 57** - 50 tOo SrA 5(7'0-57i-5a • $r». G 7 7 - ltDo 7, sr -A- 95 fao -- 17i-co Eurnc4) q/ 95 9, sue- 57 7/ /A us czniaria. d n ioriu- . ', hcWs P) .,5ft7 E /Voila (y,) ,fie e.3 Bova (2) 5 ft7 .000E (I) m F_eit rx..0 T 4f47 'Ui ofiral et cc !- 91 .3y55� 5 /4 (//:, 7 (c ex towsrs 3 (50 'az) L0'd 1SI0 -tl3S 300 OSZ 6S121 16, C0 f10N 5" (la /a; piL eizij .62 5O)R463 /z/5" fitc. 5, LAS o /Os , 577)"4- tue.ig y /3 9/4' 6'2 .1. 5 -eAtt 1., . Sy, - Z/l a - te.of t .iv 7 y '2Z(v/t /324io /9ve ki An" k (-sc.° H) ,�Pive Nu�es�l /G•o 23 sue. i yyryi: tereMirhu 255- /s9rY (6111) ii We i 9t fro A%Z' 1 77 O• 'w Zs1z't 31:374.-e/yo°2-is 4 de uasr 7/5e. 1075 ///(6 Rpcoz.L Z 4.4s ria�i aLax o8me 4) /7 f' of wohl-r dm £0'd 1SIO —kf3S 300 06L 00s4T 16, SO noN PROJECT: 4gr pimp„ Katz #1 4 ea . - T Kw1l.A eaki COL. U1- . ;. CoMPUtito ay: CROCK O /Y: DATR: I IIIIZ/ :Mt. / OP,,• -- 0 SUBJECT : T if .51 r :7eee 5 1 1 GomYria l ilhYst . 'IZZ' Q1) '{ MietefrittOufiete 77h m PucAr (/ � ) 1 1 13 ifk. 7 /� 7' • ("Di m A4 w 11 a uegzais g)MA (giro ow l / �yi 4.2117, 4 b. a aribuier C • . 1, 2, t 41 5o, u 1 GrJj'i9Pr01- (vieoPrrtfv naouvnwAl Aid S'- /o' ge4440- 6.6 cev►ngr 4 2,'° a#T1! C.) miwiste,t. 6444 % 11. G /w d b / 1 1 p140 us CosulV G�4 e„0/J734771- ( Pala) 4 ,� bh. 62, S Tom. 34 41 In Sea L zvaio FoR. MotzsetZtab om sJ9 Pkye 46 1 1, 6 = hailed and 6urfa,o/ed * 3 (rte) n4).14 Pcd Arun 2 (i wo) fteei 00800m To Ile "'WARD Sy G4iti. AA914 uisiv 40. N'JU 13 'Si 12:07 250 COE SE0-6IST P.02 U.E. ARMY CORE OP •NOMNMlEMIEr SEATTLE OIETRICT it AAA% PROJECT : fv �/ y . (/ I W G� WCI r r1�• , W14 w4' COMPUTED ■r: Pr Roth) DATE: iI /•i ( 1 SHY. Z OF 5''''. PART: ' SUBJECT: J � �p� 6 i�� CHECKED ors 61 (tnci'i *m ./Le.. Q 6/ t,�. 4 UAan 2g. W/ AtJ fae[e 3 , Iimec.dgauu5Ida- AtioviP4*u* (ern) /alit L. POLL,Pilds LA/40U mocA D MXia) Mu Z5 ! 7 ' GoR/Vus srat4o (,pe sr 0:40x4 5. • 26 5celP/ ?CA bs A1060s (Como oM s e eye 2 . �r 3 * $ez l-esfaklD Pm .x.. gm.. s 9A.L4'LiA) Aiir is. I411r" * 2- e Puhureo -1 L QIJ AntaLUVi Pe Awasegerigs Ay ury NOU 13 '91 12:08 250 COE SE9.�IST P.03 U.N. ARMY CORPS OF SNOINEOIS. SEATTLE DISTRICT PROJECT: F.+rIseN +u 00 00/20L C - w w SUBJECT : WO Si{gUb C CHECK 0 SYI S ' w 1. - a w7 A A o G/igibfiENSION Po . r r#vJ tr 'ow ova- i illW N 7t) bet Prittvroo l 5774. 5 d'b -360ta A Ausie goae ft7 t two tduwriO Sumo) ?kre*Ifillr divtaips 5 ril. MOO �� 00 g genic* o gMlspeo/ A 2 t AnwDerIvito moill Levee, lis mu,& 57 4 //1.0-'2too g gu rh 2 NOU 13 '91 12 =09 250 COE SErT I ST P.05 2 3 U.S. AMP CORM OF MINIM SEATTLE DISTRICT NOU 13 '91 12108 250 COE SER DIST P.04 US. ARMY CORPS OP UIOINS1RI, SEATTLE DISTRICT PROJECT: ( ' f LICK. d v Q [ , COMPUTED tY OATt 4 4 i i / CHICK A r: o t sNT. '� f PART I sumo. rpm 6i7V-Lt1 /402.3 G �� /94/7t ST' R - tir I ss -- /6 96 (BILL) T d se 'ZZ G a /32µo 'hese lient Oa (,s 3/- 6 38 ( ' . ri-) eat^ Z/ 20/E Mc.. #w4 s. CAS r'Ypimi6 , ti)4 402 «o3' (516Veio OVA) I D wade /39 / - 4/2.A1 , seRrT / w6. till - 2115 ( Peer4 PAL J (7) , J 4 1-1M0 cis /4y Ato _ 7/2.0 5W. cr'Aloy tA)y /403- 2 MosT AAJA.sexies cJ1 GL (Jsa t i ..isSAus Perth "up *too rtele Auto 4524tA e 1 Al osr~ Amivargoal WILL ,tae A&e m oeroeu ALL op P(. X / iei/44 g.leepoinev,004osigA, AvArc,46Z/t y /u / riaasa Puioun Piety ch4egaUty /N s raci 4r r1ka. A,Y,KSe / - - r • ver4F4.1 pc,Aiur itiorssedle. Qugk.rry, iterentro Arntoik00 em(cemprs Figeel "41I iukts smut:~ me weasel STOCK, M /'740./ • /ft(,. VM tAO&1 7A-g1/1Q/111 AI IA b lo yowl .u.- 11.11•1*. fJsu V 11∎r1 11«11 td1u11sIrA{ . IA �_I. t NOU 13 '91 12:09 260 COE SEA -;DIST P.06 U.S. ARMY CORPS OR HERS. SEATTLE DormICT PROJECT: e i.1VGiz." L.[X7D C.oNTFOL SUBJECT : 1 pLisignOci VeNt./140116 'Toll) Ill. 1. WPM mt•° . ti nwt.c44 . KieP mut,GH Ncwk4 PIP-om h'IW13K.. 4XISrit.14 m)uo urA COMPUTID •r CHICK 0 eV: OAT!: t •MIT. lr op-, PART' 41eok►L of TIe (To r or for • le,M,� rL.us$ W1fl4 �.xMINIc coon uuaa. 'NATwVe BOIL AS 15WAFIL . 4" 14.1404 404411 BSDP41 1 m24/1 tamer. IMdsIki t, M* 00114)rl 1 P1tc101 MOM. %MA% MovNO ' IU 4 TAitiP Arr Sofro M O'P p Tm - 0,71.11/ rpromp. Vag USAIL, 1) FetAole lld..6 T'{ING rnA l.iMS 041 mom - MAIL AND craw aJ o . fo w 154 fio iligtAg r' V3 of. ` 1 11TISALI. 2) club i No , b p i ' PLI (M1ON O 1 W , riropriu AND wdosp IN C AssEg.. r L.M3) N C'1'D re �rYraD C 1- I NK.WILP MOd N � . OgueL . Goc -two A 2. o IAri 14.)AimiLiNci OUR I.11 Ft-407704 4)D P•AlAK 11101.4.44 . morn rry Ati V1C. 10 %4410 (X 1 5106 0p. 34024) �wb PAYIN yoRo2u ,ss‘O) 3e ,3on¢1e0 t•1 wi. Tb PLPe1NS1'IN G , V I G ANC) PP" MI6 AAlA4I.P13tis tor- ,p4 1 oreukisimAt., Cot4suensadior4 revaao � 0 1 101 1 . Oft- fDUR'I•[i P1 04441114.1q , LOWER_ GREEN RIVER g' TUKWILA, WASHINGTON , plan view in. cc Parrs Yoro&u Norm Skjelbreia j Lee Soule Pi, -CP Dick Burnham Doug Weber INSPECTION REPORT TUKWILA SECTION 205 GREEN RIVER 1. Date of Site Visit: 12 November 1001 2. Objective of Site Visit: Work with Ann Sigenthal for the city on minor revisions to Corps efforts. Ann and Pam Yorozbu to stake the location of the trees that would be planted as part of the corps effort. 3. Name of Participants: Pam Yoroliu, Noel Gilbrough, and Norm Skaelbreia. 4. Weather Conditions: Rainty 5. Summary: 31 trees as noted on the attached diagram were located with stakes marking their location and species. The Corps will also finish the city shrubs as noted on the attached for them to plant. B. After meeting with Ann and inspecting the levee the following was requested by Ann. a. The upstream (north) ramp on the picnic table area adjacent to costco (approximately station 87 +25) should be sloped on a 12 on 1 slope to allow for handicap access to this picnic area. b. A hole adjacent to the P - 17 pump plant should be filled e. Prom approximately station 78 +00 to 85+00 them will be bark on the landward side of the levee adjacent to the coitco property and hydroWeed on the riverward bank. 8. Follow -up Action: Pam will contact Dick Burnham with the above information and Noel has furnished Em Ops a copy of the planting plan and species list. Oil rough. V.S. ANT CORPS OR INOINISRIL SEATTLE DISTRICT PROJECT: 4g4104,1 FOAM, I caare COMPuTID Sy: SUBJECT : ructioNsr CMSCK D DYs Tree i sFig-+mss GoMrAON ►1WWNe OUANTItti Misr hUAllA9lE 77huji9 cA •»4 r ) 4exg, gas ,wm ‘tero DWI r; (Rar; mom) ve Ada (iev o4) Sa,Bus mJc UPlre4f - (07.4CoPirMi /r00. 741,V 414 •E7v[,q- JAcQue ?10NT'I fkyaiS 45,&i) piuus 44417Dm JM47 - *s# Pa g) 2 t zve l/pr AA � fitena� atitifiSr eLe 6.6 tah fi�u� /a i,' c a ' hetaild kA NPO FORM 7A- R(REV) AUO 82 (Hwlou$ Editions May I. Used Until IIlxhaust d) 7 // 3, OAT!: 111 12111 •NT. OP PANT: /,2, 5a LECi 10 Fo kivitsMEN OAJ FpcJ.oaJNJy PAc)e 6 bb = hQ //e l and kirk,* * 2- 3 (rte) 774w+9 PLi64r* Aft o 2 (two) Atst 'own 7 he Pasvng, ,e 4#04SilikriAl +o. U.S. ARMY CORM OF I08O1NE SEATTLE DISTRICT ww - I ■INP PROJECT: e4 u e. Fuzeo wJr .• 1?*WILdk SUBJECT: 77-esistigas tf04 rzaf *neyes atellThoN ureme9_ Le Ptirec"Witeme. AtAl, rn (Seto c €A ) PI*1-,POSI-Mius 4.eubsil mock aka) Gogmos SrowAJ/ (E sme tre o) MPtilogac RPoS AGI US Comma) sA e ) �� NPO FORM 7A-R(REV) AUG $2 (Previous Editions May M Used Until Exhsustid1 /"IN 41" . 10 It w., 5" Vi . 3=1'4' COMPUTED WV 1 DATE /. #Rou) 1/1/ CHECKED SY I ENT. OP PART: �.L loo 3 * 'See L AJo Poe Al)AS►srodes 041 Asu-o /IVy PA4� * 2. ya 86 PcAN TWxs Ay urn WI ARMY CORM OR ISOMERS, WATTLE GIETRICT 'NOJECT: 4 leli6m. Ftelop catire4L, COMPUTED sr Pry, •cr f?J�)[A u)4 . a1�0 4) SUBJECT : cN a re.es fs soeuB Aftekr lig.67 a Acsmai use /402.s /yvm :' 2ss J5 (Ina) 22G► e9 132 mese Mew, wet (,3/ -- 5'&38 (xrr) Eaztassis- 2/2/5 Pi% 1Wy s. yes rY)o puss , L Ji . , 6,2 , o(o3y (5161/a6A 'Wu& 14) / eV ui %./7 OSS &J Afto VAszey 7/20 640. 4r4oy W Y 7-t wi 4,1.4.4 74P - ZS'S DATE: 1 0 / ENT. OP PART: "Irv AltheseErel 44.)11 04-• 0.56 lain PRiee3 AND A701) 77 AA0 DELI tIy • - Apsr NGKsaR'/!S W ii.l. es 'IOU& m osinvIAJ Acc oP pcduir MP/tell: S , o/ E N�oa e, Avr n.7i& /1�r INom.% those Pc. A�cyrs 1 ' 4u CAegrx ty lu S/Dcx 4r *egg.. ASeeJ1 • T Vl F. Pc.04far ‚4f4 4 t cak.rny, ottoman) Arnim, aggsvws p ewri "4/ cure nvaime4 Av a aa.sexy STDC • Am31 -- 240 • I ',Me NOD FORM 7A- R(REV1 AUO U (Previous Editions Mw Re Used Until f=xha :.att �`, PROJECT: 4rese4 4 C COMNTE0 SY1 D DATE: I SUBJECT : * ` w cm o SY: • 4 u u se?U AO. r r',�v,, m. P1,0/007;- 3 3 7 7?? #5e PIIunlm 53/ *S a a -3 40a / / ceR. 04__4rn 2 2 o omit LOriA/pv me Stumr.ormiatii Cat. Minx D Mg 4 .4,i,;... 57 -if#oo p pertnof AtepuEnedfli L 5. 4 / / h i a4 i% o A ALEX. Ra&uni 2 2 L Lows 41 Xis/6044W Iiii 5 /#S a auks RUB 1 1 514. 55100 . SA P P D 2 Z74. 14:45zi-67746 t tvlimob 44,417v- 3 3 14 4403 4$ ROM- _ c • Su s A Ue�ei4 5 5 s sirs o. " ta t � _ _ 5 I 7 '' 0 f VMM ¥ A • R(IIlV • AUG (Ihwl Editlona May Se Uaod Untl{ SxhauataeP .J • NOV- s -01 wta /SODS U$OA -scs RENTON. WA. 2S4?$43$25 12N aut Ing .1e.g testing Ersot Willow 1,260 or 760 600 Hooker Willow 1,200 or 750 2,200 litka Willow 2,260 or 760 2,200 Pacifica Willow 0 0 1,000 Hyb. Cottonwood 120,000 30,000 acliassamatuJigut Koakorangs 5,000 8.rvio.b.rry 1,000 Red alder 5,000 Woods rose S990 IL111M O POR SUR PROM •RR0M MO/WRY P1d- b M . I I "+ 2,000 1.0 bararoot P.42 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor M E M O R A N D U M TO: Ron Cameron, City Engineer FROM: Ann Siegenthaler, Department of Community Dev RE: LOWER GREEN RIVER LEVEE PROJECT DATE: October 24, 1991 • As part of the Shorelines Permit process for the Green River Levee project, Planning has been reviewing the project through discussions with Public Works and the Corps, site visits, and construction inspection. This review has raised several concerns regarding the project's compliance with its Shorelines Permit. Due to changes in the project, the original Shorelines Permit will need to be amended. Amendments may take the form of a letter which outlines how Public Works' proposes to address the following concerns: 1. Bare, steep banks: The project Shorelines application stated that fill would be an average of 2 feet deep. Revisions to the project have resulted in additional fill, with significant aesthetic, ecological and safety effects in many areas. To address this issue, and comply with Shorelines policies and regulations, levee embankments over 3 feet high will need to be planted with trees or shrubs. Willow, red -osier dogwood and similar native plants could satisfy this requirement without conflicting with flood control functions. 2. Tree protection /replacement: Public Works efforts to work with Planning to protect trees along the levee are appreciated. However, some trees have already been damaged from construction equipment, and some relocated trees appear sickly. The Shorelines application did not include removal of any trees. Therefore, we need to ensure that any trees lost are replaced. To comply with Shorelines regulations, all trees lost within five years of the project start date, due to construction damage or relocation, must be replaced at a 2:1 ratio. Memo Ron Cameron Green River Levee Project, 10/24/91 Page 2 3. Recreation areas: Due to the abrupt edges of the new levee, areas previously used for recreation or waysides are no longer easily accessible. For example, at the picnic area south of the P -17 pond area, there is a sharp drop of about 3 -1/2 feet between the existing grade and the top of the new levee. This abrupt grade change is especially significant for handicapped or elderly trail users and children. To comply with Shorelines policies, we need to have the Corps re -grade these areas to create some access. As a minor issue, the asphalt pads around the trail -side picnic tables (near P -17 pond) were damaged from construction. These should be repaired or new pads put in. Please let me know when we can meet with Don to go over these issues and work out some solutions. Thanks. cc: Phil Fraser Don Williams Project file Shorelines file M E M O R A N D U M TO: Jack Pace, Senior Planner FROM: Ann Siegenthaler RE: Status of: LOWER GREEN RIVER LEVEE PROJECT DATE: October 23, 1991 1. Based on discussions with Noel Gilbrough, the Corps is willing to fund enhancement tree plantings up to a few thousand dollars. The Corps will purchase and plant trees at locations specified by the City. I'm working with the Corps' landscape architect and Don Williams on identifying "shelf " /wayside areas suitable for locating trees. Our goal is to decide on tree species, size and locations by November 1st. 2. A site visit with Public Works and the Corps earlier this month, and a recent site inspection of construction have raised some issues regarding the Green River Levee project. I have some concerns about the project's compliance with its Shorelines Permit and with our overall shorelines policies. A. Steep banks: In some areas there are banks 5 -7' high and quite steep which drop off into blackberries. This raises some aesthetic and ecological concerns, and it could be a significant safety problem with respect to children. In addition, Shorelines policies and regulations call for re- vegetation of the riverbank with trees, "consistent with flood control measures." As the Shorelines application stated that fill would be an average of 2 feet deep, I don't think anyone anticipated these conditions -- especially at the time of original Council approval. Although the Corps will sod these banks, this minimal re- vegetation plan does not seem to be an adequate solution. We really need additional plantings along these banks, or at least at the base of them (e.g. willows, red -osier dogwood). We could use a portion of Corps' tree "enhancement" contribution for bank re- vegetation. Memo Jack Green River Levee Project, 10/23/91 Page 2 2. Tree protection /replacement: Although I've requested it on several occasions, the Corps has not been able to provide the City with a base map (s) noting existing trees and levee limits. Consequently, tree protection measures consist of verbal agreement on where the toe of the levee will be located relative to tree trunks. I'm concerned that trees verbally identified for protection may be damaged during construction, and that some relocated trees may not survive. A recent site visit showed that some trees may already be lost: the levee toe is unexpectedly close to trunks, some trees have been damaged by equipment, some transplanted trees look sickly. The Shorelines application did not include removal of any trees. Therefore, we need to ensure that any trees lost are replaced. We should require replacement at a 2:1 ratio of any trees lost within five years of the project start date, due to construction damage or relocation. Using the Corps tree "enhancement" funds to remedy "construction mistakes" seems to defeat the purpose of enhancement. 3. Recreation areas: Due to the abrupt edges of the new levee, areas previously used for recreation or waysides are no longer easily accessible. For example, at the picnic area south of the P -17 pond area, there is a sharp break between the existing picnic table grade and the top of the new levee. The grade difference is about 3 -1/2 feet. This may also occur at some of our proposed "shelf" waysides. This abrupt grade change is especially significant for handicapped or elderly trail users and children. Aesthetically and functionally it greatly diminishes the recreational value of the trail. Consequently, it raises concerns about the project's compliance with Shorelines policies. We need to have the Corps correct this through re- grading. 4. Pavement at picnic tables: I noticed that the asphalt pads around the trail -side picnic tables (near P -17 pond) were damaged from construction. We should require that pads be repaired or new pads be put in. I haven't talked to Don on this. LEVEE PROJECT: P -17 parklet: Discussed w /Don W. 10/23/91: Two trees, one quite large, have been transplanted into the the " parklet" at P -17 pond; locations not consistent with being developed by Parks' consultant. Don aware of that, but we'll work park plan around trees. working on arrangements with Ring County. Council has not final approval on park concept drawings. middle of the plans Don still yet given / • • .■•■., •••• „ (i • .V4 • ' " • t •e s '■•• • •k•Ao . ') • `• (I? • •. • , j • tisitsK COPb%1IIW L'J 6 o f KL_. 611.-25.11 7. • PicAte. MEA r 41-2-Smf 2, , , • • 7-1 1 \ / • la , • , Y " V\ I: • , ' • , . ' t c ■• .2 .1 r 4 /c/ z7‘7/ 5 / 5 / 4:olt: .. ■•• • ..Joe.s. 4. -A> Ato- • - * • "" ; ! I • .••••-• ••■ 1(,/ V " . ' I 'I I • • "' r • 11' 1,[14,1 7", 4 11-2-5mr City- Jf Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila. Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 City of Tukwila,. Department of Public Works Shoreline Management Act of 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE File Number: 91 -2 -SMP Approved XX Denied Date: March 28, 1991 8z.7 Ct C - s TYPE OF ACTION: Xj Substantial Development Permit EI Conditional Use ['Variance Pursuant to RCW 90.58,.a permit is hereby granted to: to undertake the following development (be specific): This is a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers project to raise the Green River pike /levee in areas south of I -405 and Christensen Trail. Also, twenty -three maple trees will be relocated alona the trail. upon the following property (legal description, i.e., section, township, range): SW 1/4 of Section 24, TWN 23. R 4; NW 1/4 of Section 25, TWN 23, R 4; SW 1/4 of Section 25, TWN 23, R 4; NW 1/4 of Section 36, TWN 23, R 4; NE 1/4 of Section 35, TWN 23, R 4; SE 1/4 of Section 35, TWN 23, R 4; SW 1/4 of Section 35, TWN 23, R 4E. THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL BE WITHIN THE AREA OF THE GREEN RIVER AND ITS ASSOCIATED WETLANDS, WHICH IS A SHORELINE OF STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE AND IS DESIGNATED AS AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT. The following master program provisions are applicable to this development (state the Master Program sections or page numbers): Public access element, page 4.3 of the City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken pursuant to the following terms and conditions: The relocation of the twenty -three maple trees shall occur before July, These trees will have a better chance of survival between April and June, opposed to July throuah September. Date --- PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMr SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT Page 2 This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other federal, state or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the per - mittee fails to comply with the terms or conditions hereof. CONSTUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) AND WAC 173-14-090, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90.58.140(5)(a)(b)(c). Director, Planning Department Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within two years from date of issuance, per WAC 173 -14 -060. APPROVED (date): THIS SECTION FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WITH A CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE PERMIT. DATE RECEIVED BY THE DEPARTMENT : DENIED (date): This conditional use /variance permit is approved /denied by the department pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: Date (Signature of authorized Department official) cc: Applicant, File, D.O.E. (25 /SHOR.PMT) TO: 2 3 MEMORANDUM Mayor Wally Rants John McFarland, City Administrator Rick Beeler, DCD Director FROM: Gary Schulz, DCD Urban Environmentalist DATE: February 25, 1992 SUBJECT: Levee construction in Bicentennial Park. The result of yesterday's on -site visit of the constructed Green River levee within Bicentennial Park, determined its width and location interferes with reasonable use of the park. After my initial review of the site with Ann Siegenthaler, we discussed potential alternatives with Mayor Rants and Don Williams. The alternative solutions to re- establishing a significant portion of park area are listed below. 1) It appears that any relocation of the earthen levee will still encroach on the park lawn. However, if the levee was moved to the existing asphalt trail, most of the park area would be accessible and unaffected. This alternative would have a configuration similar to the levee on the south side of Strander Blvd. and extend north along the existing trail. Without any guarantee of tree survival, the levee could be constructed in between the old cherry and the old maple trees. Retaining structures, tree wells, ect. would be required to minimize impact and allow the levee to fit within the area between the two trees. To avoid the current levee design and area encroachment, a gabion "stepped" wall structure is appropriate along the river side of the existing trail. This wall could use quarry spalls and be anchored into the river bank by terracing directly below the trail. The upper, exposed portion of the wall would need some waterproofing and possibly added support. Significant bank vegetation would not be impacted. Although there would be a solid wall along the trail, it would not block views of the river and could be vegetated to soften its appearance. In addition to full use of the park, I feel the large maple tree could survive the installation of a wall near a small portion of its root system. This alternative is a combination of the above for a more reasonable solution to the levee encroachment. The earthen levee would be partially moved to the existing trail and join the levee alignment directly south of Strander Blvd. Bicente nial Park Memo Februa 25, 1992 Page 2 RECOMME 'ATION: ALTERNATIVE 3 cc: An Siegenthaler, Assistant Planner Do Williams, Recreation Director Ro -s Earnst, Public Works Director Ro Cameron, City Engineer Instead of attempting to put the levee between the trees, a gabion wall co ld be constructed around the maple tree and along the top of bank to the north boundary. This alternative would utilize the existin• levee fill material and save on costs of a. full length gabion all. The integrity and aesthetics of the trees would also be pres -rued. ..k9rtAttli3 .2.4, icig2w At-I.-30W qt-z-.5n1P P.•5n Jack Pace /Darren Wilson TO: FROM: Phil Fras DATE: January 8, 1991 PF /amc:8:dike M E M O R A N D U M SUBJECT: Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application for Dike /Levee Improvements Under the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application Check- list (plans) Items B ** and D * *, please note that since this is a Pub- lic Works dike improvement program to existing levee's which are within public right -of -ways and /or easements, or which will be ac- quired prior to commencement of the project, dike maintenance and trail easements are secured for this scope of work through Corps and City Administrated Public Works Projects. In reference to the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Applica- tion Checklist (plans), Item F * * *: All existing trees shall be saved with the exception of 23 trees (see attached tree removal plan), 20 at location 1 and 3 at location 2 shall be relocated by this project. In reference to the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Applica- tion Checklist (plans) Items H * * * *, Q * * ** and R * * * *: Because of the nature of this project: To provide topping over the existing dike as shown on the 8 typical sections as shown on the Corps of Engineers' Project Plans, these typical sections can be applied throughout the project are provided in lieu of the 5' contours throughout the project. Also, it is noted that there is not much variation between any spe- cific section or variation from the typical cross section throughout the project. Therefore, it is requested the typical sections (8 for the Corps Dike Project and the signs for the Christensen Road Im- provement Project), along with the plan profiles along the lengths oof the projects suffice for the documentation with regards to typical sections throughout the project. SHbRELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Page 3 11. If the application involves a Conditional Use or Variance, set forth in full that portion of the Master Program which provides that the proposed use may be a Conditional Use or, in the case of a Variance, from which the variance is being sought (to be completed by local official): N �. Give a brief narrative description of the general nature of the improvements and land use within one thousand (1,000) feet in all directions from the development site: The existing river dike is to be r.aiseCfrom`0' to 2! which will bring it to an elevation of 2 feet above the standard project flood. The existing river trail and roadways will be reconstructed at the new elevations and some 23 existing trees will be relocated. The construction is a coordinated effort between the Army Corps of Engineers and the City of Tukwila. Development along this stretch of the river is commercial /light industrial /retail /office. LOWER GREEN RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT Fill Volume Estimate Shorelines Item S.: All fill will be select backfill, and asphalt from local suppliers. Estimated Volume: Begining Station Ending Station Shorelines Item T.: C Ave. Average Volume Depth Width Cu. Yds. 0 900 1.40 45 2,100 2,850 9,500 2.00 18 8,867 15,300 18,662 2.00 16 3,985 14,952 No excavation and removal is planned as part of this project. CENPS- EN -DB -AC (1105- 2 -10b) MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD SUBJECT: Trip Report - Lower Green River (Tukwila) Levee, Design Impacts to Existing Trees 1. On 21 July 1990, the following people conducted a plan -in -hand review of the proposed design for the Tukwila levee project: Noel Gilbrough - Project Manager, Corps of Engineers Norm Skjelbreia - Civil Engineer, Corps of Engineers (Lead Designer) Hank Birchard - Cost Engineer, Corps of Engineers Pam Yorozu - Landscape Architect, Corps of Engineers Moira Bradshaw - Community Planner, City of Tukwila Ann Sigenthaler - Landscape Designer, City of Tukwila MONSON /EN-DB -AC RICE /EN -DB O'DELL /EN EN DB FILE 6 August 1990 2. The primary areas of concern regarding impacts to existing trees are from station 30 +00 (the Bicentennial Park) through the Christensen Greenbelt Park, to station 49 +00 the Burlington Northern Railroad (BNRR) Bridge, and station 75 +00 to 95 +00 (behind Costco's parking lot). 3. A detail plan will be provided in the final plans and specifi- cations for the Bicentennial Park and the Christensen Greenbelt Park to indicate existing trees to remain and require protection during levee construction. 4. Existing trees significantly impacted by the levee design shall be removed by the City of Tukwila prior to the start of levee con- struction. Site furnishings including signage, recreation equipment, and benches shall also be removed by the City of Tukwila prior to the start of levee construction. 5. The levee design will avoid any construction within the drip - line of the two historical trees in the Bicentennial Park. One 1 1/2 -inch caliper tree will require removal in the Bicentennial Park. The City of Tukwila and the Corps of Engineers will coordi- nate on detailed design (i.e., embankment slopes and aethetic treatment) of the levee through this park. Proposed levee design I CENPS- EN -DB -AC SUBJECT: Trip Report - Lower Green River (Tukwila) Levee, Design Impacts to Existing Trees then runs through the northern portion of the cul -de -sac on the south side of Strander Boulevard and enters the Christensen Greenbelt Park. This area will also be clarified on a detail plan. 6. Between station 36+00 and station 43 +00, any existing trees (6- to 8 -inch caliper Douglas -fir, honeylocust, or maple, pre- dominately) exist on high ground on the landward side of the levee. Some of the existing trees may be impacted depending on how the levee ties to the existing high ground. In these cases, incorporating 1- to 2 -foot high drywells between the landward levee slope ana the trees in lieu of removing specific trees will be con- sidered. 7. Downstream of station 75+00 approximately 20 maple trees (10- to 16 -inch caliper and 25- to 30 -foot tall) are existing between the crushed brick and asphalt paths. The levee design will impact these 20( +) trees and the city shall decide whether to remove and relocate these trees or remove and discard the trees and replace with similar species at the 4- inch( +) caliper size in a new location. On the landward side of the levee, Costco has recently planted a 15 -foot strip of shrubs and trees in order to comply with city landscape requirements. 8. Potential areas for relocation of existing trees or planting of new shade trees and river bank vegetation are from station 45 +00 to 49 +00 on each side of the BNRR bridge and from station 64 +00 to 69 +00 (adjacent to P17 pump plant) on both the landward and river - ward side of the levee. Possibly, the small park area (station 77 +00) at the north end of the Costco parking lot may also be considered for relocating existing plants to be removed within the project limits. The City of Tukwila recommended to consider plantings of poplar or willow seedlings available from the Soil Conservation Service Nursery for quick establishment of shade /fish cover on bench areas along the river. 9. The largest existing trees on the project, including poplars and maples on the riverward side of the levee, have been determined to remain by Corps designers and shall not be impacted by levee 2 ct cc: Noel Gilbrough (CENPS-EN- PL -PF) Norm Skjelbreia (CENPS- EN- DB -CD) Pam Yorozu (CENPS- EN- DB -AC) Cyrus McNeely (CENPS-EN- PL -ER) Hank Birchard (CENPS- EN- CE -CS) Don Finney (Muckleshoot Indian Tribe) Ron Cameron (City of Tukwila) Moira Bradshaw (City of Tukwila) Ann Si nthaler (City of ' a PAM YOROZU Architectural Section CENPS- EN -DB -AC SUBJECT: Trip Report - Lower Green River (Tukwila) Levee, Design Impacts to Existing Trees construction. These trees are far enough from the structural portions of the levee and appear in stable condition to not require removal. Thinning of the crowns of these large trees is recommended to reduce the mass of the tree and windthrow potential. CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: This is a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers project to raise the Green River Dike /Levee in areas south of I -405 within the City of Tukwila. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) Along the west bank of the Green River, from just south of S. 180th St. to I - 405. Quarter: * Section: Township: * Range: * (This information may be found on your tax statement) *SEE ATTACHED LIST City of Tukwila 3. APPLICANT:* Name: Department of Public Works ATTN: Phil Fraser Address. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard •hon= 6) 433 -0179 Signature: �i j� - Date: * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY Name: SEE ATTACHED STATEMENT. OWNER SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 Address: Phone: I /WE,[signature(s)l swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL cVELOPMENT APPLICATION Page 2 5. Present use of property: River Dike /Levee and trail. Commercial road. 6. Total construction cost and fair market value of proposed project (include additional future developments contemplated but not included in this application): $1.9 Million 7. List the master program policies (use program sections or page numbers) which are applicable to this development: Shorelines, public access element, policies listed on Page 4.3 8. List any other permits for this project from state, federal or local governmental agencies for which you have applied or will apply, including the name of the issuing agency, whether the permit has been applied for (and if so, the date of the application), whether the application was approved or denied and the date of same, and the number of the application or permit: Flood Zone Control Permits, City. of Tukwila - not yet applied for 9. Nature of the existing shoreline. Describe type of shoreline, such as stream, lake, marsh, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as erosion, high bank, low bank, or dike; material such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of bulkheading, if any (to be completed by local official): Existing shoreline is river dike. 10. In the event that any of the proposed buiiidngs or structures will exceed a height of thirty-five feet above the average grade level, indicate the approximate location of and number of residential units existing and potential, that will have an obstructed view (to be completed by local official): N/A ll f SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Page 3 11. If the application involves a ConditionalUse or Variance, set forth infull thatportion of the Master Program which provides that the proposed use may be a Conditional Use or, in the case of a Varian e, from which the variance is being sought (to be completed by local official): 4/ 12. Give a brief narrative description of the general nature of the improvements and land use within one thousand (1,000) feet in all directions from the development site: The existing river dike is to be raised from 0' to 2' which will bring it to an elevation of 2 feet above the standard project flood. The existing river trail and roadways will be reconstructed at the new elevations.and some 23 existing trees will be relocated. The construction is a coordinated effort between the Army Corps of Engineers and the City of Tukwila. Development along this stretch of the river is /light industrial/retail/office. ATTACHMENT,RESPONSE TO # 6 QUARTER SW:. NW SW NW NE SE SW 23 23 23 23 23 23 LOWER GM RIVE FLO( CONTROL F TUKWILA, WASHINGTOr WER GREEN E D ': FLOOD TROL PROJECT WASHINGTON PON G.G taif*tha&1064i14 caqv,r5 eft -gl realuadS 91 Ze ; 2` /i' utitio or � ,vuIo6 W 2'S yak . v N . out& ap'pvoxi nom, 1 1(urula rx phero mode- v l42.-51 (0R, go, - ^ q+l�'!,r - ..•.rt••_ rri; a✓ a 51. i £iti� ACCESS TO TOP OF LEVEE 4 PLAN VIEW MD VOW Ti g S ET T111S GbUTRACT 1 107 Ur 0 . 1 • 07 L PLAN VIEW scut.. 1- • 2.aa' ;ar sir a 15.00 10+00 5.00 0.00 A G' TOP OF_ • ':= ORa H1GH_WA • ACCESS TO TOP OF LEVEE 1 u 55•00 G INDUSTRY DRIVE 50.00 HORIZONTAL SCALE& 1. • IOW PLAN VIEW 45.00 too• 200• r .. VERTIAC I. SCALE& i • s I IOW 0 Nor S' •b to* ACCESS 35.1 I A • • " ' t - --- , . — I I I t � MIN t a For,' , • ro•cr�r rArro vmr.rr oN t , �y T i t ' 1 t A G' TOP OF_ • ':= ORa H1GH_WA • ACCESS TO TOP OF LEVEE 1 u 55•00 G INDUSTRY DRIVE 50.00 HORIZONTAL SCALE& 1. • IOW PLAN VIEW 45.00 too• 200• r .. VERTIAC I. SCALE& i • s I IOW 0 Nor S' •b to* ACCESS 35.1 mRT/CA • ~~ ~ ACCESS TO TOP OF LEVEE � ! | / • � .1 ACCESS TO TOP OF LEVEE IOW Zoo• 0 0 4 VIEW SCALE: I. • :" 1 ur• ur uvt VERTIuI SCALE; ► n r ,e o s' io• 11 4 ) . STAGING AREA ORD. HIGH WATER TOP OF BANK • • TO ` . • ' . ACCESS TO TOP OF LEVEE F0\( W . I • 7 Q7 - r / • tyytail 5 (r4eivfcks) plait or OK 01,4 sa° 40' TOP OF BANK ORD. HIGH WATER 6 via S°ERP.Y 'I r J. 4 100 S PLAN VIEW SCALE: • Ao, 1 00. s e , A lar -I 105.00 7 r (0w z0o• VERTICAL SCALE: 100+00 z 0 5 95.00 4smp rfslf. {•...Nn • Ia I (Fr&f rids) die_ 90.00 1 IMMO LINZ I Mt, or Tukwila AVIIN3 PATH LEVEE' TYPE IV WANK wow TOP IELEVATEN MING UONE NAPE LEVEE 'TYPE e III !MOTH VNOES LEVEE. TYPE ,-, •ir LEVEE TYPE VI IONVONDIT MOW r TO MC SHOPPED Z EXISTING NIPHILT Emma coon& PATH MID ware SI 101 AT MON N COSMO NAPE I 4 r arms 12' MONT ONNO2100 VANN% WM LEVEE TYPE (III, IV, V. VI) Not to wale. JAN 8, 1901 SE1111IC 41.14.13 ;:glwotri A - LEVEEMPE, , SUM macs — r— am.e. two.. r SIE =PM •Cni WKS XEM mem srwromoit TOW WOO VMS AripE.1,-4 LEVEE TYPE VII Ilt SMIPPIS CONSMUCTIONI 1111111111 VIE NIP UNE 1111LL liCIIIMMS COI A CM Pt COM OPISI 0 5 0 z 5 3•43' CANON CRIBBING (SEE NOTE 1.) • 0-2' (VAR Ell 5'-6' 16' VARIES Tiribmize 40' 2% 60' PROFILE & PIVOT POINT I J—C UNE 20' 2X SHOW EXISTING ROADWAY:SEC11ON A J—C 0+00 TO J—C 0+50 J—C 8+50 TO J—C 8+70 N.T.S. s 'llOADWAY SECTION C J 2+20 TO J—C 5+10 N.T.S. NOTES: 1. REFER TO WASHINGTON STANDARD PLAN 0-6 FOR GABION DETAIL AND CONSTRUCTION. LEGEND 4 3: 0 ASPHALT C01.1CRETE PAVEMENT CLASS "B" 2" MINIMUM COMPACTED DEPTH of2) ASPHALT TREATED BASE 4- MINIMUM COMPACTED DEPTH a) CRUSHED SRUFACING TOP COURSE 2" MINIMUM COMPACTED DEPTH CI) BALLAST 4° MINIMUM COMPACTED DEPTH r CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK CEMENT CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER CITY OF TUKWILA STANDARD TYPE ROADWAY SECTIONS (A, C) (11.02. C Not to wale. Jan 8, 1991 Mt of T&kwlia it\ BANK CEN1REX TRAIL ASPHALT TRAIL LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR LOWER GREEN RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT 1. Relocate /Replace trees at City Inspectors direction. 2. Sod all exposed area. Not to scale. Jan 29, 1991 o / fteitia Tukwila / Pond P -17 Relocate /Replace 6 trees(6' -1 Cf' maples) to approximate original position. EXISTING ITEM T — a 0 N � CaCa LEGEND EDGE OF PAVEMENT CENTER UNE OF ROADWAY & R/W RIGHT —OF —WAY TREE do SHRUB CURB AND GUTTER STREET SIGN JUNCTION BOX UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE CULVERT STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN STORM DRAINAGE NOTE MANHOLE WATERUNE WATER METER FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE UTILITY ADJUSTMENT NOTE UNDERGROUND POWER POWER VAULT TELEPHONE VAULT ROCKERY MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT MONUMENT IN CASE GUARDRAIL UGHT STANDARD ELECTRICAL CONDUIT IRRIGATION CITE' OF TUKWIL) CHRISTENSEN ROAD BAKER BOULEVARD TO TUKWILA P[ TUKWILA, WASHINGTON PROPOSED O CCCCI a PROJECT LOCATION CITY OF RENTON PROJECT LOCATION MAP F TUKWILA NSEN ROAD ALLE? STEVE DESIGNED OKA .oweDVE TT8 • • BELL •WALKER ENGINEERS Inc. SW B•Itam•, Washington • Bolas. Idaho CITY 0 CHRISTE DRAM JJK SCALE NONE I oArt 8/2/91 + CHECKED REM FILE ., CRCOVER ❑ATE No. 4EVISION BY EXISTING ITEM T — a 0 N � CaCa LEGEND EDGE OF PAVEMENT CENTER UNE OF ROADWAY & R/W RIGHT —OF —WAY TREE do SHRUB CURB AND GUTTER STREET SIGN JUNCTION BOX UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE CULVERT STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN STORM DRAINAGE NOTE MANHOLE WATERUNE WATER METER FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE UTILITY ADJUSTMENT NOTE UNDERGROUND POWER POWER VAULT TELEPHONE VAULT ROCKERY MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT MONUMENT IN CASE GUARDRAIL UGHT STANDARD ELECTRICAL CONDUIT IRRIGATION CITE' OF TUKWIL) CHRISTENSEN ROAD BAKER BOULEVARD TO TUKWILA P[ TUKWILA, WASHINGTON PROPOSED O CCCCI a PROJECT LOCATION CITY OF RENTON PROJECT LOCATION MAP F TUKWILA NSEN ROAD ALLE? STEVE OF TU WILA ISTE \SE\ ROAD ARD TO TUKWILA PARKWAY ILA, YPASHINGTON CHRI8TE1I8EN ROAD )JECT LOCATION MAP =INEERS Inc. r Baize. Idaho PROJECT LOCATION CITY OF RENTON CITY OF TUKWILA CHRISTENSEN ROAD SHEET INDEX NO. TITLE SCHEDULE 1 1 COVER SHEET 2 -3 TYPICAL SECTIONS AND DETAILS 4 -5 PLAN do PROFILE 6 DRIVEWAY PROFILES 7 DRAINAGE de UTILITY NOTES 1#-2-U11r tea ., AUG - 6 1991 TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS CITY OFFICIALS MAYOR GARY L. VAN DUSEN CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS DENNIS ROBERTSON - PRESIDENT ALLEN EKBERG JOE H. DUFFLE JOAN HERNANDEZ STEVE LAWRENCE WALLY RANTS CLARENCE MORIWAKI PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ROSS EARNST, P.E. CITY ENGINEER RON CAMERON, P.E. COVER SHEET f T [ O392J CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNIN ., 1 TRAIL/SIDEWALK R/W VARIES 20' TO 53.86' , 2' 5' 0 VARIES - 7� 2' TRAIL 5' 5' TRAIL 11 • vARIES - � /IT jlj= X11= -]/T 7I1 -711 X11 =111 •• SEE ROCK WALL DETAIL vAR sEs •• SEE ROCK WALL DETAIL 4.5' 0.5' R/W VARIES 20' TO 53.88' 0.5' VARIES 0' TO 38' 8' GRASS SIDEWALK / /l • SEE GABION RETAINING WALL DETAILS •• SEE ROCK WALL DETAIL TRAIL AND ROADWAY SECTION - A STA. 55+55 TO STA. 59 +90 R/W VARIES 20' TO 53.88' _ - 0.03 /FT. SLOPE —0.03 FT. SLOPE n DEPTH VARIES O 0 0' TO 4.5' 0 VARIES 12' TO 15' 0.5' TRAIL /SIDEWALK AND ROADWAY SECTION — STA. 52 +35 TO STA. 55 +55 VARIES 15' TO 18' CHRISTENSEN RD. VARIES 12' TO 32' VARIES 12' TO 21.5' -0.03 FT. SLOPE —0.03 FT. SLOPE DEPTH VARIES 0 0 0' T TO O . 4..5' O CHRISTENSEN RD. VARIES 12' TO 14' 2' 0.5' PROFILE GRADE & PIVOT POINT CHRISTENSEN RD. VARIES 14' TO 18.76' PROFILE GRADE de PIVOT POINT O DEPTH VARIES O O O 0' TO 4.5' SIDEWALK AND ROADWAY SECTION - C STA. 59 +90 TO STA. 62+04 R/W VARIES 20' TO 40' 0.5' walmagm Lin _Om FT. SLOPE - 0.03 /FT. SLOPE n PROFILE GRADE & PIVOT POINT 2' R/W VARIES 20' TO 40' 0.5' R/W VARIES 26' TO 40' 2' 8' SIDEWALK -u • 0 0 0 0 DEPTH S 4 4' 4 4 VARIES 9 VARIES 7 4 ASPHAL CEMENT A.T.B. CEMENT TOP SC CEMENT GRAVEL COMPAC SEED. I EXISTINI ASPHAL CRUSHE • %// TYPICAL � DRIVEWAY EXF IF POI CEMENT CON TYPICAL DES iOPTED OKA Ago TTB 1 �� BELL -WALKER ENGINEERS Inc. ■ BW Bohn. Idaho • H•Ila�ua. llaahludton CITY OF TUKWILA CHRISTENSEN ROAD oNAM1 JJK SCALE_ NONE oArE 8/2/91 CHECKED REM . ALE , JCa TV. Sc DATE •a. NEVISIOH BY TRAIL/SIDEWALK R/W VARIES 20' TO 53.86' , 2' 5' 0 VARIES - 7� 2' TRAIL 5' 5' TRAIL 11 • vARIES - � /IT jlj= X11= -]/T 7I1 -711 X11 =111 •• SEE ROCK WALL DETAIL vAR sEs •• SEE ROCK WALL DETAIL 4.5' 0.5' R/W VARIES 20' TO 53.88' 0.5' VARIES 0' TO 38' 8' GRASS SIDEWALK / /l • SEE GABION RETAINING WALL DETAILS •• SEE ROCK WALL DETAIL TRAIL AND ROADWAY SECTION - A STA. 55+55 TO STA. 59 +90 R/W VARIES 20' TO 53.88' _ - 0.03 /FT. SLOPE —0.03 FT. SLOPE n DEPTH VARIES O 0 0' TO 4.5' 0 VARIES 12' TO 15' 0.5' TRAIL /SIDEWALK AND ROADWAY SECTION — STA. 52 +35 TO STA. 55 +55 VARIES 15' TO 18' CHRISTENSEN RD. VARIES 12' TO 32' VARIES 12' TO 21.5' -0.03 FT. SLOPE —0.03 FT. SLOPE DEPTH VARIES 0 0 0' T TO O . 4..5' O CHRISTENSEN RD. VARIES 12' TO 14' 2' 0.5' PROFILE GRADE & PIVOT POINT CHRISTENSEN RD. VARIES 14' TO 18.76' PROFILE GRADE de PIVOT POINT O DEPTH VARIES O O O 0' TO 4.5' SIDEWALK AND ROADWAY SECTION - C STA. 59 +90 TO STA. 62+04 R/W VARIES 20' TO 40' 0.5' walmagm Lin _Om FT. SLOPE - 0.03 /FT. SLOPE n PROFILE GRADE & PIVOT POINT 2' R/W VARIES 20' TO 40' 0.5' R/W VARIES 26' TO 40' 2' 8' SIDEWALK -u • 0 0 0 0 DEPTH S 4 4' 4 4 VARIES 9 VARIES 7 4 ASPHAL CEMENT A.T.B. CEMENT TOP SC CEMENT GRAVEL COMPAC SEED. I EXISTINI ASPHAL CRUSHE • %// TYPICAL � DRIVEWAY EXF IF POI CEMENT CON TYPICAL NOTE DEPTH DESCRIPTION I 3' ASPHALT CONCRETE CLASS 8 (TWO LIFTS) 2 4 CEMENT CONCRETE TRAIL 0 4' A.T.B. 0 e CEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 0 4' TOP SOIL 0 4 CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK GRAVEL BORROW AS REQUIRED $ VARIES 8 $ COMPACTED SUBGRADE O9 e SEED. FERTILIZE, MULCH VARIES EXISTING ASPHALT PVMT. TO BE REMOVED Y ASPHALT CONCRETE CLASS B t2 4 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE ERS Inc. Ruhin VARIES 4' TYPICAL ASPHALT PARKING, DRIVEWAY AND TRAIL SECTION DUMMY JOINTS EXPANSION JOINT EXPANSION JOINT ELIMINATED IF GUTTER & APRON ARE POURED MONOLITHIC CEMENT CONCRETE APPROACH DETAIL STA. 81 +70 LT. 6- CEMENT CONCRETE TYPICAL APPROACH SECTION EXISTING DRIVEWAY MATCH EXISTING ASPHALT DRIVEWAY VARIES IP MIN. VARIES • JAN 03 1992 CITY OF N PLAN iNG q �• 2 -Snnp DATE NO. io 1.5' REVISION 3' 6' GABION BASKET FASTENING DESIGNED DKA DRAW/ JJK er cHECxcD REM 1 FILE 2' GALVANIZED O.D. STEEL PIPE RAILING W_/WELDED JOINTS GALV. IN CONFORMANCE TO ASTM A 123 GROUT 2 1/4" I.D. 8 GA. GALV. RAIUNG SLEEVE 1.5' STA, 55 +95, 24' LT. TO STA. 59+10, 24' LT. APPRDVED TTB GABION RETAINING WALL & RAILING O 40 UNIT A - 2 CELL GABION - 8'X3'X3' UNIT B - 3 CELL GABION - 9'X3'X3' UNIT C - 4 CELL CANON - 12'X3'X3' GEOTDCTlLE FABRIC SCALE NONE I DATE 8/2/91 JCRCRDTL CONCRETE CLASS 3000 8' I oO MO O MIN. • RAISED PA TYPE 2d Y o 0000 15' 2' MIN. NIP ° = 8' MIN. THICKNESS 4 -2' QUARRY SPALLS SKIP CENTER STRIPE DETAIL Er Er ■.■U BELL WALKER ENGINEERS Inc. 11111111111P Boise, Idaho • B•ll•,u•, Maahington 25' 0 8' STEEL PIPE RAILING DETAIL 2• — �.� 2• MIN. 0 ca30 MIN. 4 ENT MARKER RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER OW & YELLOW TYPE 1 YELLOW 4' MIN. BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 1 N.T.S STA. 34+70 Rf. TO STA. 56+94 RT. SPA 59+23 a: TO STA. 60+65 RT. 00 0 00 R/W 3' RADIUS EXISTING GROUND PAY UNITS CAVATION ONLY CITY OF TUKWILA CHRISTENSEN ROAD • 0 15' 0 MIN. RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER TEEL PIPE RAILING DETAIL TYPE 2d YELLOW do YELLOW / TYPE 1 YELLOW 0 00000 25' KIP CENTER STRIPE DETAIL NGINEERS Inc. Bellevue, Washington GUARDRAIL AND ROCK WALL N.T.S STA. 54 +70 RT. TO STA. 56+94 RT. STA. 59 +23 RT. TO STA. 60 +85 RT. 3' RADIUS bc5 MN-'1 RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER gli-2-1.51111 CITY OF TUKWILA CHRISTENSEN ROAD UGHT LOOSE RIPRAP ' 5/16 1/2" GALVANIZED OR PLATED BOLT W /NUT (AWED BOLT CO. OR EQUIV.) AND 3/6" 1.0.— 1 0.0. NYLON WASHER (CADILAC PLASTIC OR EQUIV.) EDGE OF SIDEWALK a ,JA[NO3 1992 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. STORM DRAIN OUTLET DETAIL END SECTION STORM DRAIN OUTLET DETAIL TYPICAL SECTION ' NUT. BOLT & WASHER (2 PER SIGN TYP.) U— CHANNEL STEEL POST W14-1 30'X30. CONCRETE CLASS 3000 4 to to in ANDARD SIGN INSTALLATION N.T.S. APPROX. STA. 63+00 LT. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED SY ENGINEER GABION RETAINING WALL & RAIUNG, GUARDRAIL & ROCK WALL, STORM DRAIN AND SIGN INSTALLATION DETAILS 30 25 20 25 0 20 15 N 10 h 0 c• -: © 13' )'c: MOO 11.5' 1 ^E. xLRO .• f'M� L C C • L / '! . 1 Ln _ • ►- !�►:trl �4l�GLI' .rT _��Irw a • r• ' ' Rl ' v wr•e w rao wag .• • v. Wow lra��( l a:i M a•'Rr mSn:v i vlR. .v'v v u � CEMENT CONC. • RB-de G 32' LT T.C. 27.35 A 36•26'0t R - 250.00' T •• 82.28' L >. 158.97' r E TRAIL S00'20' 3'W 0 RIGHT 0 WAY WILD IIC F- LU W (/) LI 1J.1 U) TOP start z - .REAR 0 m to to n In 15 - 00 C.B. #D -9 STA. 55 +70 8' RT 56 00 KA MTER GENIC PADS ELEC. ALLMLI PARKING ELEV. 27 T.G.E. 27J 6 I.E. 19.82 (1' IN I.E. 19.72 (1Er OUT 81 " 'WILDING GE /OWNER 116 ANDOVER PARK EAST TUKWILA, WA 98188 i -Ot FR. A in RIPRAP + , .i TRAIT CURVE DAT1\ N m 3 A .r 36'00'03' \\ R .. 40.00' \\� r L - 25.114' 1-i P.C. 5 F GENERAL NOTES C. 26.91 �� 0 RELOCATE SIGN TO BACK OF SIDEWALK. \ $ REMOVE EXISTING 12' RCP CULVERT. 3 ADJUST AND PAVE TO MATCH EXISTING PARKING AREA. 4' TRANSVERSE JOINT. BEGIN ASPHALT CONCRETE TRAIL 40 ,p� END CEMENT CONCRETE TRAIL /SIDEWALK. ® SKIP CENTER STRIPE DETAIL SHEET B3. © INSTALL SIGN R7 -801. L 1' RT I.E. 20.07 it IN N) I.E. 20.00 (1Er OUT E) 12 LF. 1 QONC. 16 C. ROADWAY PROF1LE GRADE FYICRIMn Rnlm PRnrttt 123 LF. 2' CONC. 10 0.50% 00 55 00 to II) U +0.20% C.B. , D -7 4+ C.B. TYPE 1 TG.. 400 I.E. 81.00 1 IN E I.E. 20.79 1 IN N I.E. 20.69 1 OUT 5) 123 LF. 12' CONC. 0 a. C.D. #D -0 STA. 54 +95, 3 2' LT. C.B. TYPE 1 T.G.E 26.41 I.E. 1 F.-- i C N) SD 4I LF. .12' CONC. C.B. ►D -5 5$7k 54+06„ 29' RT C.a. TYPE ANDOVER PARK A: ASPHALT INURING DAIS RE VISION DC DESIGNED DKA DRAWN JJK ciatsro REM APPROVED 718 SCALE I' 20'1 DATE 8/2/91 rut JCRPPI MOM BELL 'WALKER ENGINEERS Inc. 1♦1111111111111 Boise, Idaho • Bellevue. Washington 17 -00 I.E. 21.13 12' IN N 1.E. 21.03 '12' OUT 5) C.B. D -6 STA. 54+50 12' RT 1 T.G.E. 26.92 I.E. 23.00(12' UT W) 15 LEI. 1 CONC. 1 54 - 00 TEXACO INC. - TAX DEPT. P.O. 90X. 7813 CURVE DATA UNIVtRSAL CITY, CA 91608 P.1... 54+19.00 O .• 7'00' R - 1030.00' T v 63.00' L - 125.84' • ELECTRIC* ELECTRIC** EL[CT51C44 ELECTe1W EI.ECVIIC* ELECTING. RE 767 LF. O \ V iv.,; ( 4. 1 r .u.. CAST 0VE i 8.5 FRe 2 . -0.20% FI LL 66 LF. P.T. 53 +26.5. 15 SD FD E.Y.C. 53 +40 27.08 12' CONC7. 0 0,50 C.B. #0 -2 STA. 53 -30. 12' 141/ C.B. TYPE 1 T.G.E. 28.68 -I, I.E. 21.66 12' 0 20 LF. ti CONC. C.B. #0 -4 STA. 53 +3R 32' LT LG.E. 26.09 I L 22.0712' IN S) i2 LF. I E. 21.97 12' OUT 1 CONC. MATCH EXISTING MATCH EXISTING CURB' PAVEMENT DOL [ (JR C. 53 +13 23' RT REMOVE 50 L1 EXTRUDED CURL P.T. 52 +91.18 5 BAIL,42QFILEt IMP (may F ISTA 5300. 32' RT C.B. w ilt 1 T.Q.E. 25.00 1.C1 22.20 12' Mi E T) LEI 21.56 1F' IN E) 1.E.1 21.46 1 OUT S) 5300 P.C. 52 +41 15' T.C. 28.1 mL - CA J �n daa4, b 191- cA tr "vl P " 1lJ 7O1 - a/Plihtj ‘`e' CITY OF TUKWILA CHRISTENSEN ROA 4 .- 0 TRAIL RROFILft I P.L 19 +50 2 � nn ?ate dam, ` -! 60/ be/fuxew J I �l s r . lid/ �- 1 I _ 4a1 _ tL�' 75 fyrnii tAA4te V t0 j . P 1 J 1�.�C - j ' j Y/ fdl J'lI L —4 / II, I' / dejb ,y ‘41/14,M11 ' , ., ( � ' � jy l ELEV. 25.96 E. C. 53 +40 '' ' V �'i Z ) cps .� -4 +,�,, De/ �j 970 Of G GG ' ' ` 'I 44 A9 # L , C. ! M/f't LI, M -ri or 610K ea L'W t E i sG inb a '- ?�1 / Q , c , CLLV 27.0: 0; 25 _ — 2' CON . 0 0.50 I 20 ' 49e).77 .s tp C.B. I012 # RV STA. 53+30, 12' �G�.fl (Gethe s" erf5 V s ® I 15 C.B. TYPE 1 T.C.E. 28.68 1,6-2 2i1 df �LG! -7. I E)• - - ,...0. r"' � A • = + .n�. o , c i• 041:4,0 w 10 .11 I.E. 21.66 12' 0 V 20 LF. r CONC. I 1 STA. .3+30. 32' RT 1 i I. 0-4 I J C.B. TYPE 1 I. 53 +30 32' LT T.R.E. 25.00 i 52+00 I. IYf C .E. 26.09 22.07 21.97 LF. 1 1� 12' IN S) 12' OUT N CONC. LEI I.E I.EI 22.26 ((12 IN NW) 21.56 (12" IN E) 21.46 1r OUT S) (( 1 5 3100 I P 51 - 00 TEXACO INC. - TAX DEPT. P.O. ;10X. 7813 TA UNNtRSAL CITY, CA 91608 +19.00 '00' 00' 0' 84' .CCIRIW CLCCTAIU• P.T. 53 +26.5 1:' - SD 0 nl STRIPE o(A33 MG, TRAIL CURVE 041) o - 36'26'02' R ,0 250.00' T - 82.28' L - 158.97' , E TRAIL SO0'20' 8.5' • RT ,o r RIGHT OF WAY 23' Ni REMOVE 50 L, EXTRUDED CURL P.T. 52 +91.18 5 , .C. 53 +13 2' ,RIGHT OF WAY --10 �J R "� ... A r • 5 3'W 1 P.C. 52 +41 15' T. - -' • to .C. 28.17 REMOVE 767 L. /• O T ' TM ' RECAST TRAFFIC CU' .O \ f ` " �� a \ � ' �• ' O 0 • j /ilx ..0 RS Inc. Raalliagtan MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT bOLLAROS ELECT/II JO MATCH EXIST1NG m , _ _ ■■ a • / / c� CURB CITY OF TUKWILA CHRISTENSEN ROA . \ y ( OF o r:WILA / \+ N N — — / /. 0230 HUIZCNTAL AND VERY . CLNIRUL BASED ON U.S. CORP Of +INCERS OANY PLAN AND PROFILE Pe J r ; ) r I BENCHMARK FOUND PK NAIL IN ASPHALT PAL EAST SIDE JAMES CHRISTENSEN RD APPNOx 450' NORTH OF INTERSECTI of 9 &.:( ANO JAMES CHRIST ENSEN ND U.S. CORP OF ENG IF:EFS POINT No. 226 ELEVATION 22.87 3 4 / , / 7 35 00+ C.B. STA 4-10 +87 1' L C.B. a +73 10' LT CONC. , T.G 7.000 (PRO'OSED) N NE) c.a T.G.E. I.E. 14.47 I.E. 1 �.36 64 LFt T c F -0.i0% 875 POSED) a : LF. 12' 1.00 % -- STA 58+75. 44' 8 58+ 3 MATCF EXISTI VG PAVEMENT > a 06'91 Y313 I.E. 16.b6 I.E. 15.17 I.E 14.93 LA LF T.G.E. 18' IN 21' INS 24' OUT 1 24 -OW 22 68 (EXISTING) I `PR4 24 IN SW) �24 OPT NE) 24 CONa. n (FYi . C.B. 1 T.C.E. E 1 I.E. 22 R 0 O 30 LF 1 T CONC F ROA 00 +19 ' y St'll • N N L9 '011'd i 1 1 ft 'f1M13 - - ~_ _ _ . MINI mm. _ ___ 100' V.C. -1.02% 100' V.C. x9 20 - - -- - - - ,i . - $ $ � � " ��F . � Mil EMS A KA 5 + • N V • c i _ �-- 86 LF. 18' CONC. O 1.00% 18 =� ...... - 1O 2 i " r MCP 10 I.E. n.37 _ x 7> r L UWE FIPPEL1NE a w C .:. pp-11 SIN b0 +66 1' RT C.B. #0 -12 STA. 0 +66 14' RT - ri7 R 4' 12' IN 18' C.B. ( -5 STA 8 +70 1 C.B. TYPE 2 T.G.E 25.81 A C. TY PE 2 T.G.E. 25.40 10 1814 12' 01 10 LF1 12' CONd C.B. 60 -13 STA. ) +66. 21' T. 28176 I.E. 21. I.E. 18.9Z TG.E 28.82 T.G.E. 2 I I E 1.40 (12' ; I.E. 17.50 ( (17' I.E. 17.40 17 5 1.6. 15.52 2 ' OUT N) ma 1t28 12" IN w)) ma 2t26 12" IN E C.B. b0 -14 STA. +66. 14' 62 -00 C.B. TYPE D T.G.E. 25.40 I.E. 20.50 12" OUT 12 L.E. 1 CONC. 61 00 ) C.B. TYPE 1 T.G.E. 121.90 I.E. 18.70 (12' 7 LF. 12' CONC E) 60 -00 59 -00 kli fiallill i CXRISTA'1VSA'N ROAD 62 m „ I F.E. 21.111 6' I.C. 16.84 S. a E. 56' O.0 MATCH DUSTING 0 KING CO. 50' D.C. 1 -1 4 CON • IT O '8, 1 10 DAR[ NO. REVISION DES101[D OKA DRA4A1 JJK eY 01Ea(D REM APPROVED TTB FAyE 1' = 2 jj iE 8/2/91 FILE JCRPP2 MINIM BELL • WALKER ENGINEERS Inc. 111111111111111 Boise, Idaho • Bellevue, Washington END PROTECT S"62 +,04 � 4 .0. I.C. 11.37 M. I.E. 16.27 3. I.E. 1 I.E. 11.12 r. ID Z N SI J N LIGHT 0o 01 IIDD U CV .1 .0 oa U0� it a vl /1. 20.1 PH 4* A3ALT INNING u0 Uo r L( -84 O U `� 1 1 f 1.20 6' IO OR + (0 W In 0 e" i s V b { . .� b f'•" lal o a O / 06 7 OMVEL gal \+ E7 VC ' b [Z] W CZ W m m U • WU BM ASPLT 'MA INS RIVER VIEW PLAZA II C/0 TECTON CO. 111 QUEEN ANN AVE. N SEATTLE, WA 98109 RICHARD & CAROLYN K. HAVX P.O. BOX. 26039 SAN DIEGO. CA 92126 /a ww 3 GRAVEL 60 +03 G BEGIN CURB, GUTTER & SIDEWALK REMOVAL LT. BEGIN CURB & REMOVAL RT. END PRECAST TRAFFIC CURB REMOV TCH EXISTING HALT WALK N N 4 1 1 CURVE DATA P.I.= 80+00.00 al A = 10'37'29' R = 550,00' T = 51.14' L = 101,99' m PALO ING OUTFAI,L' RIPROP WILDING MATC t7�1 EXTRUDED CURB MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT CITY OF TUKWILA CHRISTENSEN ROAD PITNEY 8 WALTER H. IE STANFORD. CT MATCH EXITING EXTRUDED (CURB E) . � IN W IN N OUT SE) / . S FRM. 1 (Da 78 PRECA51 CO D VE CRS C CURB TRAFFIC REMOVE REPLANT AFTER C / t�2 REMOVE TO NEW 0 1�� O REMOVE TO NEW O4 w; CON REMOVE CR Ei1 GRASS AI (3 REMOVE © REMOVE I NEW C RELOCATE FOR N SEE PAR) 8 TRANSVER RELOCATE 1 BEMCHMAI WAY PRO LE NG ROAD PROI 148 [LF. 3 LP. 121 CU WILDING ANDOVER PART( S. I PITNEY 8 REAL: ESTATE WALTER H. .HEELER. JR. DRIVE STANFORD, CT 06926 9 END ROCKWALL, 34 RT. STING MATCH EXISTING wuolw ASMALT MOVE MATCH EXITING l MATCH EXISTING O ENO GUARD RAIL. 21 RT. EXTRUDED CURB PAVEMENT CURB GfXRE. T o.n�ING MATCr6OSTING EXTRUDED CURB MATCH COSTING O PAVEMENT O ,.... 00R . 7/ / 4/0/ tt uwrt 13' / C` —^ T\ M G 0 TA 3 �/ i �'� i �,,,,�� �4 . + LO r to H to v F- V W to 2 226 +00.00 —� — 4 "" ^G�s ��( .. o :-..--m• • o•. or • • *row • 0 0 29• rT D 'I n + - 15' R �j©1/ , a . 4 Ni, r� `� •� LL / 0 I `/� ��` f,...' ‚o 99' cr N © Fl • O ,' ��� O N ,. w i� 1 -1 4 CON R �O I .c . � ''° ` X 52 ' D.C. O i I I..oiNG •• •� u O B, 1 10 c' e�� SK1P CENTER O �_� _ ° 50' D `I "" STRIPE .. - 0 2 . 0 = 1 ' 4 S09 - =- A. :E CMP •� . � ` ott O ® ,�© 3 j Y / ► I v !� ji c ` C 5 8 50' D.C. O R�VE 767 1" C CUR 50 /j / ii�� / • �- _.- r. - �' CONCR 4":12g 1 -� ` J — _---- i — ∎ � - ' - ' � - i� �� RIGHT OF WAY — � y.10 CURVE DATA !� A � ' J N ERAL NOTE$ — •� C � 'N R I PI= 56 +04.34 r i ` �O REMOVE AND MAINTAIN PLANTS DURING CONSTRUCTION n - 16 + ? .� /� R - 830.45' ' � �, 2y 7-- — __ _ R AFTER CONSTRUCTION. E PLANTERS TO SIMILAR CONDITION L = 2122.50' 3 25' O F OZ REMOVE EXISTING IRRIGATION. INSTALL NEW IRRIGATION BASED ON U.S. / TO NEW GRADE. O � � 03 REMOVE COSTING BOLLARDS. REINSTALL BOLLARDS n / n TO NEW GRADE AT LOCATIONS DETERMINED BY ENGINEER. KING CO. % O4 REMOVE DUSTING EXTRUDED CURB. INSTALL NEW CEMENT S. CONCRETE EXTRUDED CURB ON NEW GRADE. ALLOW PLANTERS AND T GRASS AREAS TO DRAIN ONTO ASPHALT WHERE REQUIRED. OUTFACE' ® REMOVE EXISTING 12' CMP CULVERT. BENCHMARK FOUND PK NAIL M RIPR�P/ © REMOVE COSTING ASPHALT PAVING. SEE DRIVEWAY PROFILES EAST SIDE JAMES 450' NORTH OF FOR NEW GRADES. PAVE ACCORDING TO TYPICAL SECTION. AND JAMES CHRISTENSEN E 07 RELOCATE HISTORICAL MONUMENT TO APPROX. STA. 59 +68, 33' LT. ELEVATION 22.57 SEE PARKS DEPT. ......... f ' STATE OF ASHI NGTON WASHINGTON CARP OF TICAL CONTROL Olira IN ASPHALT WALK CHRISTENSEN RD APPROX. INTERSECTION OF BAKER RD POINT No. C.B. A -8 STA 5 +73 10' LT TRANSVERSE JOINT. BEGIN ASPHALT CONCRETE LT. END CEMENT CONCRETE RT. 9 RELOCATE SIGN. REPLACE TIMBER POST WITH U- CHANNEL STEEL POST. 130 BENCHMARK TO BE RE- ESTABLISHED BY CfTY OF TUKWILA. o 0 35 . T.G.E. ' 6.75 R • FOSED) (L I.E. 1 .37 (24 C NE) I.E. 141.32 2C' C. NE) 4 LFl 24 CONC. T T G F 77 77 (p(jF1IpIG STA. 8 +75, 44' ' T C.B. I i 4 STA- 57 +50 14' T C.B. ,4 c STA. 56+94. 51' RT r 30 1 251 C.B. TYPE 1 T.G.E. 25.00 I.E. 22.00 12' OUT 30 LF. 12 CONC In D. N • > y w C.B. TYPE f' I.E. 24.00 (12' 0UfT 150 LE. 12' CONC. II S) C.B. TYPE T.G.E. 2400 I.E. I.E 21.00 1 12' OUT E) -0.20% A8 LF. 1 0 1.00% CONC. E RO 'WAY PRO LE GRAD Q I I 37 LF. 1 CONC. — — — — I, II II.Ili I , EX NG ROAD PROFILE I — 17 CONO. 40' t I — — 148 ILF. 17 C Nt . O 2.C413 12' I n =v 0 1.00% ^ 47 LF 0 1.00% CONC. 55 L 201 ��■ : e% 15 86 LF. 18' CANC. 0 1.00% nw � — "Y w w C.B. qD - STA. 59+ ' ' 7 I 0 14' LT C .8. STA. 0 -5 8 +70 1 RT SiA qq 57 _ 14' RT g 6 _ 96` 14' RT STA. 5+ +65 C.B. 2 T.G.E. 27105 t.8. TYPE 2 2658 T.G.E. . LE. 19.38 12' IN NW C.B. 1 10 .r_Tra.•∎•l.t. T.C.E. I.E. S I.E. 26.82 SO (12' 7 (( IN W) OUT SE) /1• b+52. 24' KT T.G.E. 26.176 I.E. 21.00 I.E. 17.02] I.E. 16.9 (17 IN (17 IN MY) 18' OUT I.E. 18.63 12' OUT S) LE. 19.28 1 OUTS C.B. TYPE �, • T.G.E. 22.85 c > ( I.E. 19.85 ' S. I 1 (17 OUT SE) I 5 59 00 5$ 00 � IO I � ' D4 y. 57 -00 is Inc. Te.hington CITY OF TUKWILA CHRISTENSEN ROAD PLAN AND PROFILE f a l -2 -Sri DESICHEp DKA I.o.Ravw rrs � BELL•WALKER ENGINEERS Inc. � DOM Bois., Idaho • Bal1^n•' Washington CITY OF TUKWILA CHRISTENSEN ROAD �� 1 DRAVN JJK ISCA" volt Y • 1 1 DATE 7/18/91 CHECKED REM BILE _ _ _ JCRPRO 30 1 REVISION BY 75IX3 30 Q i 30 4" 3 -__ • N N + - - -- 25 S'LZ —3: -.8.97x I sow - 1 S,+ I I n , 24.00 25 = LLZ 25 -- -- -- - 0 I �I II II 20 20 20 0 +00 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +50 0 +00 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +50 O+OC STb 52+91 STA. 57+23 30 w ,- 1SIX3 30 3C e 25 -31 9Z K Z•LZ i'SZ Z•SZ 1+ £L'SZ I K 2 HOLM + 25 SL• 9£'£ a p NOM , -5.87x 20 --- ____ f' - - -- 10' V.C. 20 N -3.. —3.58X _ � • + -_,_ '_ 0 +00 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +50 0 +00 +10 +20 +30 4740 +50 +30 SA. 58 +E 7 STA. 61+13 151x3 30 99'1 76 MATCH Ly LZ' 30 i 1st H3M t(8+ ` t+ "rr a -n 47% .I 6 , I 'cz + I — _ 25 N t +0.48% N + + N I.0% + —3% NO LZ 25 n — — � -"- - 20 1 20 LZ 1. :. . .. . •,. . . . . .. 10 N + V.C. -. . .. . .. . y. STA. 59 +75 T E -IN WI S. TRAIL Tli� STA. -IN WITH 59 +50 N. TRAIL a l -2 -Sri DESICHEp DKA I.o.Ravw rrs � BELL•WALKER ENGINEERS Inc. � DOM Bois., Idaho • Bal1^n•' Washington CITY OF TUKWILA CHRISTENSEN ROAD �� 1 DRAVN JJK ISCA" volt Y • 1 1 DATE 7/18/91 CHECKED REM BILE _ _ _ JCRPRO DATE NO. REVISION BY a l -2 -Sri CITY OF TUKWILA 6 C DRIVEWAY PROFILES CHRISTENSEN ROAD 7 1GINEERS Inc. Bellevue, Washington • i '1SIX3 H: - 1 _ '1St N + 3x s 1' i 1 +55 MAT( I I 25 _3 6.9x � 9C$Z I 1 1 x 1 1 1 9.1rtE i ( ( H31Y11 I 20 H 1 , +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +30 0 +00 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +SO STA. 57 +23 STA. 57 +83 to M N cv fii L_____]/401111 - 3% -3.58X 'ZE co In ri 4 + +1 +20 +30 +40 +50 +30 STA. 61 +13 30 ;�L .0 30 25 £L 24 £S H31VW $ �a 7x '-- r - -- . , � j 'CZ L+ -3% N )t'LZ µr �* - -- - _ - - -- 20 tZ 1 LL 20 EBNIffi'd , C. TIE—IN STA. WITti 59 +50 N. - • . IAN 0 . PLANNING --- --.., 3 199Z z i nI✓ 4g , , . ,„ L. Co go t .,.- t CITY OF TUKWILA 6 C DRIVEWAY PROFILES CHRISTENSEN ROAD 7 1GINEERS Inc. Bellevue, Washington • JAM 40. 1 DRAINAGE NOTES 1. REMOVE EXISTING CMP AND INSTALL NEW RCP AS SPECIFIED. 2. INSTALL. 18" OIL SEPERATOR, STD. PLAN 8 ■3, IN EXISTING MANHOLE. 3. INSTALL DRAINAGE GATE AT OUTLET OF 18" STORM UNE 4. INSTALL 24" OIL SEPERATOR. STD. PLAN 8 -3, IN EXISTNG CATCH BASIN. INSTALL DRAINAGE GATE AT OUTLET OF STORM UNE •TENSION DRAINAGE OESIGNEO OKA .a"•OVEn 719 OiuvN JJK SCA.f NONE 04ECXE0 REM nIL y1t 9/2/91 :CRSNSHI STRUCTURE NOTES 0••11 BELL • WALKER ENGINEERS Inc. MOW B•11•rru•, Naah,n ton • Boia•. Idaho cOgs NATION U -1 U -2 U -3 U-4 U -1 U -2 U-3 U-4 U -5 11 -7 60+27. 24' LT 81+09. 33' LT. U-6 U ■9 U -10 U -11 U■12 STATION SHEET #4 53+00. 40' LT. 54+83. 40' L.T. 54+51.84 53 +55 TOTAL -SHEET #4 SHEEP #5 61 +54. 20' LT. 81 +57. 22' LT. 61 +87. 21' LT. 58+41. 15' RT. 58+15. 17' Rf. 57+05. 35' RT. 58 +50, 33' RT. 60+51.12 59 +49.13 57 +25.09 TOTAL -SHEET #5 GRAND TOTAL. CITY OF TUKWILA CHRISTENSEN ROAD a • e V E 2 3 5 UTILITY NOTES 1. REMOVE UGHT STANDARD STANDARD AND NEW FOUL 2. INSTALL 14' MAST ARM W 3. INSTALL 8' MAST ARM WIT METAL FRAME AND GRATE, STD. PLAN 8 - CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 I CATCH BASIN TYPE 2, 4r DUN. I CATCH BASIN TYPE 2. 5( DIAM. OIL D. SEPERATOR 8 - 3 ONLY ST PLAN SL -B Mild 'MS 'H3AO3 ONV DNRI 31OHNVM STORM 2 '_ SEWER PIPE 1 STORM 8 SEWER PIPE 1 DWI. STORM SEWER PIPE • DWI. CONNECTION TO EXISTING DRAINAGE FACILITY 31vO 3 M1MIOI 'ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE TO GRADE 1 I GRAVEL BORROW INCLUDING HAUL S3ION .VB3N35I j STATION EA. EA. EA. EL EL EA. l�l 5 E1. EL EL TON SHEET #4 , 0 - 53+09, "+09, 40' R'. 1 1 21 18 - 0-2 53 +30. 12' RT. Fl ^F FEE 20 TI�I 0-3 53 +30, 32' RT. 66 0-4 53 +30, 32' LT. 42 _ Q-5 54+00, 29' RT. 1 1 47 41 0-6 54+50. 12' RT. 1 1 15 7 0-7 54+50. 27' RT. 1 1 11 23 107 0-8 54+95. 32' LT. 1 1 187 75 ,. 0-9 55 +70, 8' RT. 1 1 1 1 3 _ 0 -10 55 +70, 21• RT. 1 1 12 I 12 0-11 55+67. 46' LT. 1 3 , TOTAL -SHEET 414 9 i 9 11 1 1 1501 12 1 1 1391 1 SHEET #5 • . 0-1 58 +52, 24' RT. 1 1 47 41 0-2 58 +94, 51• RT. 1 1 37 . 165 32 , 0•3 57 +55, 14' RT. 1 1 113 0- 57 +50. 14' LT. 1 1 150 29 D-5 58 +70, 14' RT. 1 1 38 86 0-6 58 +75. 44' RT. 1 1 30 26 0 •7 59+00. 14' LT. 1 1 88 1 220 x.4,3 D-6 59 +73, 10' LT. 1 I 84 1 1 230 0 -9 58 +98. 14' 'RT, 1 1 I 55 I I 72 0 -10 59 +87. 1' LT. 1 114 1 56 1 0 -11 60 +68, 1' RT. 1 I 1 1 , 0-12 60 +66. 14' RT. 1 1 10 9 _ D-13 60+68, 21' RT. 1 1 1 -- 7 8 0-14 60+66. 14' LT. 1 ^ 1 12 11 0 •15 , 61 +73. 9' LT. 1 TOTAL -SHEET #5 11 1 5 7 1 11 I 1 1499 86 1 78 2 1 1 3 I 983 GRAND TOTAL 20 114 17 1 1 12 12 11000198 178 1 3 1 2 3 1354 JAM 40. 1 DRAINAGE NOTES 1. REMOVE EXISTING CMP AND INSTALL NEW RCP AS SPECIFIED. 2. INSTALL. 18" OIL SEPERATOR, STD. PLAN 8 ■3, IN EXISTING MANHOLE. 3. INSTALL DRAINAGE GATE AT OUTLET OF 18" STORM UNE 4. INSTALL 24" OIL SEPERATOR. STD. PLAN 8 -3, IN EXISTNG CATCH BASIN. INSTALL DRAINAGE GATE AT OUTLET OF STORM UNE •TENSION DRAINAGE OESIGNEO OKA .a"•OVEn 719 OiuvN JJK SCA.f NONE 04ECXE0 REM nIL y1t 9/2/91 :CRSNSHI STRUCTURE NOTES 0••11 BELL • WALKER ENGINEERS Inc. MOW B•11•rru•, Naah,n ton • Boia•. Idaho cOgs NATION U -1 U -2 U -3 U-4 U -1 U -2 U-3 U-4 U -5 11 -7 60+27. 24' LT 81+09. 33' LT. U-6 U ■9 U -10 U -11 U■12 STATION SHEET #4 53+00. 40' LT. 54+83. 40' L.T. 54+51.84 53 +55 TOTAL -SHEET #4 SHEEP #5 61 +54. 20' LT. 81 +57. 22' LT. 61 +87. 21' LT. 58+41. 15' RT. 58+15. 17' Rf. 57+05. 35' RT. 58 +50, 33' RT. 60+51.12 59 +49.13 57 +25.09 TOTAL -SHEET #5 GRAND TOTAL. CITY OF TUKWILA CHRISTENSEN ROAD a • e V E 2 3 5 UTILITY NOTES 1. REMOVE UGHT STANDARD STANDARD AND NEW FOUL 2. INSTALL 14' MAST ARM W 3. INSTALL 8' MAST ARM WIT JEERS Inc. Bohm, Idaho UTILITIES CITY OF TUKWILA CHRISTENSEN ROAD UTILITY NOTES 1. REMOVE UGHT STANDARD AND FOUNDATION. INSTALL LIGHT STANDARD AND NEW FOUNDATION AT NEW GRADE 2. INSTALL 14' MAST ARM WITH LUMINAIRE 3. INSTALL 8' MAST ARM WITH LUMINA/RE IMEREM JAN 03 1992 CITY OF TUKWILA/ PLANNING DEPT. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY NOTES MONUMENT FRAME AND COVER I REMOVE AND INSTAU. EXoSTTNG LIGHT STANDARD AND UGNT STANDARD FOUNDATION NOIIYONITOJ OWONvLS 1HW OW PINY 1SYY1 HUM ONYONVxS DIM M3N T1V15N1 I 3OYHD 01 3ATYA 9NUSDC3 lsnrav I SALON IVN3N39 Dyq NATION STATION EA. E EA. FA SHEET 414 0•1 53+00. 40' LT. 1 2 1,./-2 54+65. 40' LT. 1 2 U -3 54+61.84 1 1.I•4 53 +56 , 1 . , , TOTAL —SHEET #4 2 2 I SHEET #5 1./-1 81+54. 20' LT. 1 _ 0■2 61 +57. 22' LT. f 1 0-3 61+87. 21' LT. 1 1 , ' U•4 56+41. 15' RT. 1 3 U-5 58 +15. 17' RT. 1 U-6 57+05. 35' RT. 1 U -7 58 +50. 33' RT. 1 U-6 60+27. 24' LT. 1 1 0-9 61+09. 33' LT. 1 1 , U -10 80+51.12 1 , U -11 59 +49.13 1 0-12 57 +25.09 1 , TOTAL —SHEET #5 3 I 4 I 1 2 13 ' GRAND TOTAL 5 1 1 4 1 4 1 3[ JEERS Inc. Bohm, Idaho UTILITIES CITY OF TUKWILA CHRISTENSEN ROAD UTILITY NOTES 1. REMOVE UGHT STANDARD AND FOUNDATION. INSTALL LIGHT STANDARD AND NEW FOUNDATION AT NEW GRADE 2. INSTALL 14' MAST ARM WITH LUMINAIRE 3. INSTALL 8' MAST ARM WITH LUMINA/RE IMEREM JAN 03 1992 CITY OF TUKWILA/ PLANNING DEPT. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY NOTES . . ' „.. 0 .nis INc.. 1 2 3 -4 6 7 8, 9 10 11 M.M. 12 ' \ IF THIS MICROFILMED .DOCUMENT LESS ; CLEAR THAN THIS.NOTICE,. DUE TO 0€ sz BG 9Z GZ Ce ZZ THE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL-DOCUMENT 'i 8 8 L 9 9 e z 0 II i i iitiii I I II II I - I I I i iii I 'll in ill ffiNTIMMENZEItEr= ii i iv tilimitnilm --- • . , • - ;; • , . . - , • .;7 ; 1 .1! 11 rt • • . . . , . . . . . . . ; ;,.; • " • • ' ; • ' • "' • •... . • . • • . • . • • • „........„ , . . 4: 4V*Pittt • \ .. t •, ' • ". V ,S. ■ 9 P 7 1 : 199/ ..: cirr , .../i': . r.;*4,..,„,,."-!!‘ •:::,":..: ., ' cariformvii co gnom CAW? car6 Mel ,•. Z . • I :CITY TUt vi Li '' II�III�III�IIIII IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII IIII IIIIIIIII Illillll I 0 " r " ....14 1 7 3_ 111111. 1. L1III1I1I1III1IIIIIIIII1III111L1Ijl1l1lP1II 11111III1I1I1III1I1I1III1III1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11 M NI"BUU . 12 IF THIS MI CROFILMS, DOCUMENT�xS LESS �z ' CLEAR; THAN' IT `IS , DUE TO I1T;OF13HE .ORIGINALARICUMENT 1fI11111A® 1�DI 11[lf�(1�llill�u��F`u.lIIuui71 i i liiil[II�II�iI� OC.T 1 1991 clry OFF = 1 Tijg PIAA!NING DEP <II1I1IIIII1I1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII�I�IIIII�IIIII�II I� p, . ».4. IN.. 1 2 g • IF THI$44P:;tOFIL ,, WOOCUMENT R HA LES CLE M 'NTH[S tibT tt I;S�, >p ITO zz tz 4S '' IGI ALA I1�111i 111IlillflllflifllQilmfffll mm mm�liilfi a ii?lliwSiln iii coati ll r ko-E _ --E- =_ =:-C°' Cf) — vi o I- : 1- =_____:: t .. .. : c / )- I" I i : : 5 0 ". 1 7: == — ,-I 0 = =---- ____ ===. r u ; '-' 2_ = E = ; y =7= frj wo . , = , I- E = O 2 0: = CC l- E =--- In (;) er > :-.7 - = — = ===-- U- 1: :=; =_. 0 E --- ,...t 0 C..) I- ■ = .;— A = 0= c r rpraqi ;I(IJ li1I1Ul!i!i!lill •ta iyl;3} NIVw3a di 3301.. SfOa331NO3 ; 0i1SiX3 : .spa orda O1 33a1L' 9n0n3133a Oi1SIX3 . anoiNo319a99:3. ; 5311.1 ayn9;•,ONINIWa3110.� 2103: 3181SNONS3a. H010'0000 ' 1 a • . SNOLLV01UIO3dS :33S•40M 0OS. ) I 1 !i.'I •0N3J311 r 1334 321vribS, '3'S snonNllNOO•: .. '1NOl H3 8wnN j. ' 1N30a3d • . s 1131N30 NO • • '0'0 . 1N10P NOISNVdX3 P 3 SNOLLVOL41O3ds ' '... S.03ds . . 31MYIXOadd11 • •XO8ddV dl • 9.13193 VOld 1 J • .. am , 1 111 NISVB H01V0 ' a313w a31VM • OVOtflIVa 1SOd;1HOn .:WnwMlw• ' 'NW • • 1V ' • . :. 0 '..wnroxvw xvw HIIM : • snlava a . " anb3eave': • we 3 '3N00 - • • ONV • • V . Sa33NION3 30 41100. ' S'n . NO 03SV8 1021N N1N 00 1YJIla3A aNV 'dZIaOH • :'NOLLOAWLSNO0 A8:030Viii0-S1NSW3AOadrI )laVd'J.LSIX3 TN 40 81Vd3a. • . 3j 3181SNONS3a 38.TIVHS a01OVa1N a1 03'.'NOLLOnSNO0 ONIanO ;'.. ;S1N3113AOadI I: )IaYd O.LSIX3 a3H10 :.TIV: :333x1 '$ N011.011a15N00' ONlana _ Onand 341 Oi'' N3dO , NM13a • Ol SV3aN Nava '£ ® 311S340 40 ' 0380410 38 TNHS SNOLLVAVOX3 110E4 1/1031/11 TILE SS33 Q.11V . a3SOd IO 38 1T,HS SNOLLVAVOX3 003: 03&111118 COS TN "1 31bN 2I . ia11 raid ` 111WIIIMMIg 1�I,I�1ll1IN, 491►11El J 1LiL� [�Ii!►,I<i[►� WRIIAi411 W . W(130014WWI0 W01S3141430 ti71ttI t x Ht � ;J'' , ''J(UI1 .I.-4I; `33IJ.ON rS . NH IJ< 31113"10 , ZL Y 8 :. L- 77'977 '' �III�111�111�111�111�111�111�111�111�111�II I�III�III�III�fII�111�II1�III�III�III�III�III�IIIt f1T�t 111111417101611111111i111l111h11i1 ' .dJLL NMYi ''005 , 3ONV8 .3n13o3a,1- IS•NOU ISN anaOO•A9 a38ausia S 9 p : :• • ' ` • • ` • . ' • , .!N '':'ONINN103B - 321f1L1 aolaa:;s3nntin ONLLVt01. aoA 3'IS1SWOds3a.. SI aolavlNOO• '•s ..' :, , . ' .''• SIN ir3alfbb8 1.13taNa3A0o H11M :3ONVaa000Vs NI Ow .1 . 'In3MY1 .VA I: 3O O3SOdI0 . - .:: 38.01 30/..3115 d_i0 40 ,O3S0d • 38.01:.5.Ma31VW • 11V ''4. ' ' 'NM13a:01 51VIa31Vw'•1NV'Id • •O:1SIX3, O camas M0138. ONV 3A08V;' 30r1Va OIOAV '£ N6110(IUISNOJ:.H1llIi1.9N1O 3O0ad...Q1 IOlad' 10311HblJV. 3J 3SONYI. . . - '• i o.,NOLI N31 1V 3141'.011�1on0a8:38: .SNOWaN00: 3a1S ONV . SNOLLVOI3 13adS. 210 / • soNlMVaa .1411M; s3toNVd3aosla �rro . • 1.3 :•SIHI d0 NUOM• H. 'HSffd voO' dv Ot ??13010 NI / ' '2P ' _ / "'' a31vWN1 38:-01 01314 NI NI Sa3aa10 39NVHO,VO /ONV . r' ,r yy ' , •• S1N3w1SAPav :_3a033a3H1 .'XOaddV -3IV• OVOa 'N3SN3NSINHO 831Wr :. %' - '' ✓ . , ' , P 1Ma 141-.8 Ma 0 N33110 3141 N331.1138 -.521(101N00 ,011,81X3 -1W . _:- , ,, . .. SIHI' 03. a3 , aVd3ad JAN 5VM J13Aan5 31Va1n00V.. NV' ' 1 i� t9'ZZ..NOLLVA313 . . . • 9ZZ 'ON 1NIOd Sa %-n '' Oa N3SN31SINHO, S3NVP'ONV ,' r. •' ' • • 113/11/8 40 NOLL03Sa31NI . 11a0N .00 • • . 'XOad& .a N3 S3wVP 3015 19/3 . )I'1VM 1 NI IIVN. ' aNn03 : _ •"N11VIIH3N38 . ' Yll/ANIIL •N0 . ''A110 3H1` JlA'f531vO013a 39 : 01:NOIS 1VNOLLVWa03NI , • . ':'aNV )IaVd 'O.1SIX3 . eIJLL ',"3301 0.1SI70 ;AO 3N11411:10 • NIH11M :33NV8HOLSIa OIOAV • • . .Ol • ' 11001118321 O.1SI)13 • • 0 No0 '40 31 00 n� • . XOVa 3)118 :213.1N30 • NMN3a Ol HLVd • •'ov .z1 o.1Sna `I NM. oNINd13a J.LSUQ ::.s :.5U0l51A81:;' .1 1 INIMONBEIMENERIEN MEM MEM IMEEMEEI 'A3si3' BaAO''�{OJ i1 Nr.01.''03a1nC3a Sb S30ba0 HSI . '+ 1N3OVPOV 1 38.1 VH , 1i33a3 �; > 01f982�iJ:" 111013[ # '�'CNIH39•N3NI`'(Z /L' . �y 3 3.01 • H3NI d 0 •3N L1 \�I'17 . 3 8 • 3 �•.�� f o 3bvd M S•GM 0o'3dla• ( £ ThD4L,a 1sNr ` J ;:133i:�(S"G)'3fILi- 7tt1r3lNL • 'ri' • 'NIB • WAV1 aos 30/219 HSIIVI�' .. . • 'a 6 ' ��. 'c1 LL' 1NIOP "'1001 •: H1001IS 301h1 HONI (Z) OPAL. V321d JA ld • .l'MHdSV •;,o ,p,:o. ix '' Jai :a.I :•1.Vd' • •..'3N1.03a10.0'13a 'V"I 113d' OL43Va1;1003 a3SV3H0NI.•30 SV3aY:• NI; .OT VV1SNI;3 .`1VHS lew s .a I aveld () ;Ow; ',1L •31 xor.itemnaptwiLlimtemilimenewmarsorwe • '• t;.• ..• , • •• . • AIR ',SLOW :IRRIGATION . SYSTEM .ThA0V0Ht TO •: • • • `,..• • ; , • • • I • •'!; • •. . . , . ,.;: • , • , • • . • • • , •