Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 91-06-CUP - MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE - WASTEWATER PUMP STATION CONDITIONAL USE91-06-CUP 91-6-cup 91-08-dr epic-52-91 king county metro wastewater pump station CONDITIONAL USE April 24, 1992, Applicant.name: METRO Address: .• 821 Second Ave., M.S. SC Seattle, WA 98104 -1598 Re: Notice of Decision by the Board of Architectural Review and Planning Commission File Numbers: 91 -8 -DR and 91-6-CUP. This is to confirm that the Board•of Apchi:tectural Review (BAR) and Planning Commission approved the project: design and a Conditional Use Permit for a proposed sewage pump station on April 23, 1992. (The Conditions are listed on Attachment A.) The BAR and Planning Commission adopted the findings and conclusions contained in the Staff Report dated April 16, 1992. Any changes to the specific design approved by the BAR will required further BAR. approval. Minor, incidental changes may be administratively, approved by the Director of Community Development. The decision of the BAR and Planning Commission is not final until the appeal period has elapsed, which' is ten calendar days after the above date of decision. • Appeals must be filed in writing to the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m. on the final day of the appeal period. Where the final day of an appeal period falls on a weekend or holiday, the appeal period will be extended to 5:00 p.m. on the next work day. If you should have any question regarding this"..project, please feel free to contact me at 431 -3663. Sincerely, Denni Shefrin Associate .Planner cc: City of Tukwila 6200..Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 John W. Rants, Mayor Sheldon .Teel Mark Dallas. Ron Cameron NOTICE OF DECISION Phone: (206) 433.1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 433 -1833 ATTACHMENT A 91- 8- DR /91 -6 -CUP Metro Pump Station Condition 1. The building crown shall be strengthened in width or projection. Changes to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. Condition 4. That all proposed benches be designed with architectural interest, texture- and integration with the project (to be reviewed by the Planning Division). Condition 5. That a plaque, sign or other structural element be placed on the site which provides information about the facility to the general public. The structure and location shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. Condition 6. That the grasscrete along the ramp be omitted. Condition 7. That construction and permanent easements be granted • by the City prior to the issuance of . building permits. Condition 8. That widths and alignments for' sidewalk and trail comply with the Interurban Avenue Street Plan. This shall be verified prior to the issuance of building permits. Condition 2. That additional brick be used on the north and south building elevations (to be reviewed by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits). Condition 3. That the doors and louvers on all elevations be painted a color which blends with the brick color (to be reviewed by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits). HEARING DATE: FILE: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: ACREAGE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONE DISTRICT: SEPA DETERMINATION: PLANNING STAFF: ATTACHMENTS: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director STAFF REPORT BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW/PLANNING COMMISSION Prepared April 16, 1992 April 23, 1992 91 -8 -DR and 91 -6-CUP Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle (METRO) Design Review and Conditional Use Permit Approval for the construction of a 7,915 square -foot sewage pump station. The site is located between the Tukwila Shops building and Foster Links Golf Course on the East side of Interurban Avenue South. The property lies within the Interurban Special Review District. (.3 acres) approximately 13,460 square feet Light Industry and Commercial M -1 (Light Industry) and C -2 (Commercial) Determination of Nonsignihcance issued August 19, 1991 Denni Shefrin A. B. C. D. E. F. G. Vicinity Map Site Plan Pump Station Landscape Plan West Elevation (Colored elevations to be provided at hearing) East and West Elevations South and North Elevations Perspective Drawing John W Rants, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 Staff Report to Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review Below are items to be presented at the hearing: 91- 6-CUP, 91 -8 -DR: METRO Page 2 H. Letter from Nancy Lamb, Chairperson of the Tukwila Arts Commission. . I. Design Review Application J. Conditional Use Permit Application . K. Photo with perspective overlay L. Aerial photograph M. Model O. Proposed material samples and colors Staff Report to Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION Surrounding zoning: North: RA (Agricultural) South: M -1 (Light Industry) BACKGROUND FINDINGS 91 -6 -CUP, 91 -8-DR: METRO Page 3 Project Description: The site is located within the Interurban Special Review District and is on the east side of Interurban Avenue South between the City Shops building and Foster Links Golf Course. The project would involve the construction of a 7,915 square -foot 3 -level sewage pump station. The project would be built on approximately 13,460 square feet of City -owned property. The City and Seattle City Light would grant easements for the development. The project would also include an art project, a plaza and trail improvements to provide a link to the Interurban /Green River Trail system. A 6-foot wide sidewalk would be installed adjacent to Interurban with an additional 8 feet of trail surface. An existing pump station located on the west side of Interurban would be removed once the proposed facility is in operation. Access to the site would be from Interurban on the north side of the project site. The drive would replace an existing driveway on the south end of the golf course. The project also includes the vacation of a portion of Maule Avenue. All mechanical equipment would either be enclosed within the building in order to muffle potential external noise or hidden from view by screen walls (see site plan, attachment B). Terrain: The site is relatively flat. A drainage ditch is located on the western edge of the property adjacent to Interurban Ave. The ditch would be filled and a culvert installed as part of the project. The City Shops building is separated from the site by Maule Avenue. East: RA West: C -2 (Regional Retail) Public Facilities: Existing utilities in the vicinity of the proposed project include water, gas, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, telephone and electrical power. The West Point sewage treatment plant does not have the capacity to treat the Alki Art Project Interurban Corridor Study and Design Plan, 1978 91 -6 -CUP, 91 -8 -DR: METRO Staff Report to Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review Page 4 flows, particularly during peak storm events. METRO has proposed that the flows be transferred from METRO's south Seattle service area to the Renton treatment plant. Secondary treatment would then be provided to wastewater collected from the Alki service area. The sewer line connection at 42nd Avenue South and Interurban Avenue South has overflowed into the Duwamish River during heavy rains. A new sewer trunk line would be installed and tied to METRO's regional treatment plant in Renton. The future sewer trunk line would require a Conditional Use Permit and is not part of this project. The art space would be about a 19 -foot x 19 -foot square and would incorporate tile risers and several metal sculptures and text inscribed in the tiled areas. Components of the art project would be representative of Tukwila's history including the Interurban rail station and the Duwamish River. A drinking fountain would also be incorporated within the space. The art project concept (funded by METRO), was presented to the Tukwila Arts Commission in January of this year. The project received a favorable endorsement by the Commission (see letter, Attachment H). The artist, Claudia Fitch, will be at the April hearing to describe the art project concept. Since no building permit would be required for the art project, the art project is exempt from BAR review. In 1978, a study was prepared by a planning consultant with the assistance of the Department of Community Development to look at the Interurban corridor. Two design approaches were identified: LINEAR and AREA. In evaluating the development activity which has occurred along the Interurban Avenue corridor, it is clear that the pattern of development is linear, meaning that development is unified rather than clustered with open spaces in between. The staff report contains two sections: Design Review and Conditional Use Permit. DESIGN REVIEW DECISION CRITERIA Staff Report to Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review Page 5 Board review criteria are shown below in bold followed by staffs analysis. The applicant's response to the design criteria is attached to this report (Attachment J). 18.60.050 Review Criteria (1) Relationship of Structure to Site. A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. The proposed street trees are similar to those used along the golf course frontage. Continuity in materials help to achieve a stronger connection between different land uses and also serves to define pedestrian and bike access. The two groves of cherry trees further enhance the street. Proposed landscape materials along the sides and rear portion of the project are deliberately dense to screen the facility from the golf course and City Shops building as recommended by the Parks and Recreation Department. Service areas are located behind the building and screen walls which extend in both directions from the building. The sides and rear of the facility would be bermed and planted with dense landscaping including Douglas Fir trees. Less used service areas would be grasscrete .(see attachment C). (2) Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area 91 -6 -CUP, 91 -8-DR: METRO A. Harmony in texture, lines and masses is encouraged. B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of st{ fety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. Because it is difficult to define neighborhood character for this area, the proposal includes elements which help to transition the facility with the golf course, trail system and art project. Berming combined with tree types and placement would help to screen the facility from the golf course. Intrusion of vehicles with trail users would be minimized because of a single driveway to be used for servicing the facility only. Staff Report to Planning Commission 91- 6-CUP, 91 -8 -DR: METRO and Board of Architectural Review Page 6 The project also proposes a brick and concrete hardscape pattern which would extend the plaza to the curb line along Interurban. This surface treatment provides for a unique way of leading to a visual focal point which can be experienced by vehicle, pedestrian and biker traffic.. (3) Landscape and Site Treatment (4) Building Design A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrians or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building sites limit planting; the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas in encouraged. F. Screening of services yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by sue of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting win not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. H. Exterior lighting, when uses, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and futures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided As indicated earlier, site grading will include berms to blend with the golf course berm system. Seating areas would be provided within the lawn areas in addition to benches located at the base and along the ramp leading up to the facility. Proposed landscaping would enhance the architectural features by aligning the cherry trees on the building and plaza grid system. The tree and flower colors would accent the building and paving. Exterior lighting is proposed along the north and south screen wall to illuminate the rampway (a total of 10 lights enclosed in glass block). Additional lighting would be cast from the building's interior to the exterior plaza /art space. The glass block would serve to prevent unnecessary glare. A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. C. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good proportions and relationship to on another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with Staff Report to Planning Commission 91- 6-CUP, 91 -8-DR: METRO and Board of Architectural Review Page 7 anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. The building would be three levels, only one of which would be above ground. The building height from finished grade in front would be 14 feet and 17.5 feet at the rear. The building has been designed to serve as a backdrop for the art project. The pump station would be accessed from Interurban. A plaza would be located in front of the building incorporating the art space. The grid pattern is carried from the building's facade through the plaza and onto the street by use of brick and concrete as surface treatment. A rampway would lead from the sidewalk/trail up to each side of the building front to enable handicap access as required by the American Disability Act. Fenestration (windows) would be maximized on the front elevation to encourage public viewing. Proposed colors and materials for the front facade include red brick with precast concrete banding and two types of glass block, one type would be more translucent than the second (glass samples to be provided at the hearing). The glass block allows both for a view of the building's interior and to provide back lighting for the art space at night. Separations between the glass block would be white metal. The applicant also proposes an architectural element of white screening at the top of the building. The screen wa1i-would be an open lattice made of white painted metal similar to the screen wall. The 10 light fixtures would be enclosed in glass block with a concrete cap and base. The wall base would be brick. The side and rear elevations as proposed would be precast concrete with banding and a brick cornice. All doors, louvers and stair railings would be painted grey. The pig launchers and odor scrubbers (8 feet high) would be located behind the screen wall. Additional landscaping would be installed between the service area and screen wall. (5) Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. Staff Report to Planning Commission 91- 6-CUP, 91 -8 -DR: METRO and Board of Architectural Review Page 8 B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and building. • Precast concrete benches would be incorporated into the plaza grid pattern. Additional seating would be part of the art project. Site lighting would be incorporated into the glass block elements of the building and screen wall. A drinking fountain would be one of the art objects. INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT 1. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural smoothes of the arse. The landscaping of the site reflects and extends the golf course landscaping to the north. Other landscaping shapes and defines the site and public areas. No immediate landscape features currently exist. 2. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities. This project incorporates the future bike trail and sidewalk by encouraging site access and use. This building provides a rest stop and point of interest along Interurban Avenue. 3. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on site pedestrian circulation. Both stairs and ramps provide access to the plaza level and art project location. Proximity to the street and night lighting give convenient access and safety. Also, see No. 2 above. 4. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complementary to the district in which it is located. The design for this building de- emphasizes the operational aspects of this structure and conversely emphasizes public use and interaction along the street front. 5. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse environmental impacts. The site plan separates and screens the operational areas from the public areas and street front. The perimeter of the site provides a buffer to adjacent properties. Also, see No. 4. 6. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features in the area. Staff Report to Planning Commission 91- 6-CUP, 91 -8-DR: METRO and Board of Architectural Review Page 9 Historic relationships are to be incorporated into the art project in the public plaza area. Specific objects; text and materials for these commissions will be determined at a later time. CONCLUSIONS The applicant has demonstrated a unique design approach to a necessary facility which is commonly unsightly and intrusive within a community. The proposal achieves architectural harmony by incorporating the grid pattern into the building, the plaza area and sidewalk. Tukwila is fortunate to be a recipient of a regionally - funded art project designed to be integrated with the building and site design. (1) Relationship of Structure to Site. The site is currently vacant. The project would serve to create a streetscape and provide visual interest along this portion of Interurban. Little change would occur to the existing land form except for added berming The overall project would provide a unique place of interest, interaction and rest along the Green River Trail System. (2) Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. See No. (1) above. Further, the hardscape or surface treatment serves to introduce the project to passersby. (3) Landscape and Site Treatment Tree types would be similar to those in front of the golf course in order to frame the sidewalk and trail along Interurban. Berming combined with dense landscaping would be P A successful in blending with the sculptured land form of the golf course while proving amp e 6) screening of the facility. The plaza area would provide an interest node along the trail where trail users could learn about pieces of Tukwila's history contained within the art space. It is recommended that a plaque, sign or similar device be placed on site which describes the pump station. (4) Building Design The project demonstrates a unique approach in design for a pump station. The simple natural elements used in the building design (brick and glass) create a frame for the art project. The frame is augmented by carrying the grid pattern along the hard surfaces of the plaza and out to the curb. To provide for stronger continuity, all building elevations should be brick.. Doors and louvers colors should blend with the brick. The roof -top element should be omitted to keep the frame simple. Because the roof is flat, the edge should be strengthened either by projecting the cap, or by widening. Building Staff Report to Planning Commission 91 -6 -CUP, 91 -8 -DR: METRO and Board of Architectural Review Page 10 The screen walls should be flush with the building walls to create more space for landscape area. Additional Landscaping in this area would soften a hard surface effect created by the ramps and plaza. The grasscrete should be omitted so as not to interfere with handicap access. (5) Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture Illumination of the project at night would add life to Interurban. The art project would be back -lit by low -level lighting behind the glass block. The ramp would also be lit to enhance the span of the frame while providing a safe walking experience. Proposed benches should be designed to be architecturally compatible with the overall project. RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Division recommends the applicant's request for Design Review Approval be approved with . the following conditions: 1. That the roof -top element be omitted. 2. That the building crown be strengthened in width or projection. Changes to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. (,)4 = L16i1T I�l? DUI- �f 3. That brick be used on all building facades rather than concie 4. That all doors and louvers be painted to match the brick color. Site Plan 5. That all proposed benches be designed with architectural interest, texture and integration with the project. 6. Move the screen wall back towards the building. Add landscaping between the wall and ramp. Omit the grasscrete along the ramp. 7. That a plaque, sign or other structural element be placed on the site which provides information about the facility to the general public. The structure and location shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. That construction and permanent easements be granted by the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. That widths and alignments for the sidewalk and trail comply with the Interurban Avenue Street plan. This shall be verified prior to the issuance of building permits. That v ,p.tipS 'Xf wu (PLCAP4MC rt,t, QCs Aci eri 2.-/ o t ti tU4'\ L2C.. tuptet,L W' - 5q (!.%�.t/22(2_- �2 cvL L f y ai Lp , � Staff Report to Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review 91- 6-CUP, 91 -8 -DR: METRO Page 11 CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION A. The proposed use will not be material detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. See responses to Nos. 1, 2 and 4 contained in Design Review discussion. B. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. See responses to Nos. 1 -5 in Design Review discussion and response 1 -6 under Interurban Special Review District. C. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation , building and site design. See response No. 2 (Design Review) D. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive' Land Use Policy Plan. This facility complies with the goals and policies for utilities outlined by the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan: Sidewalks/Pathways : Objective 6. Create a functional, safe and convenient sidewalk or pathway system. Sanitary Sewer System : Objective 3. Provide an efficient and adequate sanitary sewer service to residents of the city. Policy 1. Coordinate with METRO for the continued treatment of sanitary waste. Design: Policy 4. Gauge the size of the new sanitary sewage systems to the expected requirements of the area's planned land use. Policy 5. Design new sewer systems to allow for their extension into potential future service areas. E. All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located See response to Nos. 1 and 2 (Design Review) Staff Report to Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review CONCLUSIONS ' The project as proposed meets each of the Conditional Use Permit criteria (see Design Review Criteria 1 -5). The proposal also complies with the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan policies and objectives for sidewalks, pathways and for sanitary sewer systems. The project further meets the intent of the LINEAR approach described in the Interurban Corridor Study and Design Plan. This is accomplished by providing a continuous edge along the street by use of trees. The proposed hardscape connect the project to the street both visually and functionally. The change in surface treatment better delineates the property's space for trail users. The conditions recommended for Design Review approval would further enhance the design of the facility and ensure its compatibility with surrounding land uses. RECOMMENDATIONS 91- 6-CUP, 91 -8-DR: METRO Page 12 The Planning Division recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with the Design Review conditions discussed earlier in this report. A • • • DATE • HOR Engineering. Inc. And Associated firm c 0 • PROPAOCIA Ad won. • I LEISLILLDRORHalatt =MCC 141. (Inemine "aid rook. DRAW AREAS: Stu (PoOmoIX 13.431 00 It Doling Upper Floor 2. lous. fl. zma a. Lwow Thor MO 0 1. 0 - 117TAL 713 4. Poefooe'Opefooe DAV* TAP RA R. Rao& 1744 nc MIR TOTAL 10035 AA I. • Saud: Font 75 goo Ian • ?An Wet 4T TAR fotaI does oat Adds no looming whoa brroof Oa moss. Imo * okrillET1:113 n1? 'TAT =WY. ■Aso AZ • C PRELIMINARY I Ilooldpality of Illotropotion &RAIL •OOPTREPA PROJECT VICINITY MAP V 0 -411/92 r. no ftrl n0 0 IT. G-1 somic INVINSEI 1 111 MMEMMUMMEMMEMMIIM OMMEEMEMMEN ---7".cP2C5S immesitimmummummosummannum mmusimonmemmmmummaimm= IMMOIMET■ITIMEMKONTI MINIM 11111 m "" : 11111111L 3111 - i scxj18 R/W— PROPOSED INTERURBAN AVE. MUM NENE 1$1 - PROPOTITI PUMP STATIC* TTIANSFORTIER ,1■114 1119.91 CCNCRETE TYE. PIC LAUNCHERS Mt Mil* CITY OF IUKAILA PROPERTY - x EXIST FENCE [ PRELIMINARY S • J • EXIST COLE UNKS ACCESS ROAD *IV NIDE (TD BE ABANDONED AT COMPLETION OF THE PROJEC A CONNECT NEW,QOLF UNKS ACCESS ROAD THE EXISTING, TES AREA PROPOSED lEMP CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT BOUNDARY • • / HDR Engineering, Inc. And Am:misted Firms V af911:92. J A C.RAvEL i syUGR-12 CRASS BLOCK AREA -1 " - METRO Ilvaleptlty of /1.1rep01.es Scala. 01TERV11041 PROJECT SITE PLAN • 20 e WOE LIAULE ME RAT (TO BE VACATED)--' PROPOSED EASEMENT BOUNOART LIMES OF TETJP CCNSIRUCTION EASEMENT rcR MAP STATION GRAVEL 8 1 "4/v92 9 09.9 9 C301 it•tr PIG LAUNCHERS (14) LAUREL. 2 CAL (16) ABEUA. 5 CAL El2ST1NG DOUGLAS' / CONNECT NClRL•G1110ABN5: ACCESS ROAD V0 THE EXISBNG. THIS AREA KD*4X1NNICK • 16. 0.C.. 4• POT A 1 .HOR Engineering, Inc. And Assocblsd !inns _4_ AAA 51ow,e 47 M.S. re COOS (�)565Gi' O c G rw�v vw u o mre W orIMOAD A • SALAL O 24' 0.C.. 1 CAL (22) BIRBERRY. 5 CAL NIIPLR6AN %10.CCT PUMP• STATION PLANTING PLAN • CLAS 11R, 10-12 10 -12' .STAT1cH - )-liaRtjERRi. 5 GJ W AAEL -. • L301 • �e enNrn,nuunwnnu•e nnruuumn ueunnuunn"nrn.oeu - -. �_ , 1r :::h1;;,r,r;1W';r;;��s:::1;1 — =— �:_•:R_ •. rnnu ;;iliiinrl°;:rMllnrl ::: _� ..nn mr urw.emn nnnawm umnnn i wum ' m""1 ;nm{;'"1 �'I ee.cOtno'{;n;;uo ea. r.... ;;;: i m{� t o � u. n. t u . e• n •••mn _ _........• !r— ir .- _....._. -._f� Wit— - WASP. n OWL .P13 LAUNCHERS IN FRONT HDR.Enoineerin9, Inc. 'Ant ? ?taeblM r. EAST ELEVATION .. rrrnr n1lnlrllr euBirrl rin. I1I r I r rlt 1lnttrrrn t eeerr= r.rn rlrrnrr ... _ '•.'r'rn r ,1 1f ,rnrrr, n, "TT; ":1 " "11:;'1:e1N " " ^ " "" • 11 , {;';" "; ';i'i;; {;;; ; {i••:9 nrrnn • i � • M ETAL S FENCE. FAINT ME D '';i;i;;i{ ::: ;;;;; ;; ;;; n rlr;r {; ;;n;Irntnnr r1 ::. �;;;;;;;;; ' =:■ � ' unuu I" annum .�.tsrzrunuur { "uw i ee mrr ... nr,..ar.,rrur.a , n ; :: wrrnrnnm"rm� •rr �ru..rnur 1;;';;{;un {nt...n uur�r. ,•�. �1i a n nm - �� rrn rrnrrrrrrrr ;rrr {' ::.�r;;rrrrrl {r {;t; { .; .• : : {3... irrr nr;rr�r eee.rrrr rrrrrrnr�n.rn. ee■rt {n WEST ELEVATION w•. I04 .(ra.VnF. 3111' . t -0' rn.nhr .o GLASS SLOCR UGHT FIIITURL TT►. -- METRO 0008 SCRUBBERS UN FRONT) PRELIMINARY NuNelM"ly .1 S.Irepo41.• S.•IU. ontitorsu4 110A1 ELEVATIONS A -1 ti • n NOR Encineel:ng, Ire. Am" AFfxiplt0 re+.t • • e.... crt+ta ,tp..t -.t ; METRO 111 - - 1 -0' • ■unle.pollty el Metropolitan 311111. • IIIRIA.'e1Nl Pr,.JC:t ELEVATIONS NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 0 ODOR WIICX, TYP. METAL SCREEN FENCE, PAINTED MITE/ C PRELIMINARY z 4/V92 I • • r mei • rL[ \' H3H Enq;nfer•g, o-c. A 0 AffotnreO tiros V • • 'AP r E T R O . Wu -pd,tp •.f W tr.pohbn 7ultY .nCr am• ..xn PERSPECTIVE PRELIMINARY 7 uvez . I A -3 A • • 8 0 C r • . .. .,�, +:- Y.:^ e..>.n.,::�u`- :Y.a.;- .:::wxs�w' t ..r.J�. 3$. r ,.>�.c.., -_.��. •. • • January 16, •1992 Councilmember Jim Street Chairperson - Metro Arts Committee 821 Second Ave., MS -130 Seattle, WA 98104 -598 Subject: Project Art for the Interurban Metro Pumping Station Dear Councilmember Street: cc: Mayor John W. Rants Allan Ekberg Don Williams Lynn Devoir Jack Pace CarolVaienta Claudia Fitch City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: (206) 433-1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 433-1833 John W. Rants, Mayor GE@EN I JAN 21 1992 L. CITY OF TUraNILA PLANNING DEPT. The Metro Arts Program Coordinator Carol Valenta brought a group of personnel involved in the subject Metro project to make presentations at the monthly meeting of the Tukwila Arts Commission, which was held on Tuesday, January 7th. Project artist Claudia Fitch and her associate Judith Roche described the current refined form of the art elements. They have obviously researched the history of the locale with thoroughness and with sensitive care for the history and feeling of place. Both' the total concept and the artistic details are well indicative of this. The Tukwila Arts Commission herewith expresses its enthusiasm for, and endorsement of, the art concept as it has been presented. We look forward expectantly to the time of construction and installation of the art project and feel it will be an outstanding addition to the appearance of Interurban Avenue. Sincerely, /1G!/Lt -G� �. ✓N_4c.; 14. Nancy Lamb Chairperson - Tukwila Arts Commission 11 ATTACHMENT H • CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, V. A 98188 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 .: -FOR STAFF USE .ONL Y,::. Planner: < .- 4F_ - e' `.. t r• ' .:. ... : Pi.::.::::::11 Cross= Reference Files: '`' ` I. I r :R e c eipt ITumbe , II/ l* I i / A,R . : r *" . j ::.. i I I•� •�: r. i � � .. t� , 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: •�` lWA�STEwATER ^,•R. ST r (Replacement Facility) BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGREVIEW APPLICATION PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) Interurban Ave. at Tukwila Shops (Volvo — White) Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement) 3. APPLICANT:* Name: Address. Phone. Signature: Date: * The applicant is the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and repo, ,s shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY Name: OWNER Address: Phone: I/ WE,[signature(s)] swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and. belief. Date: - ATTACHMENT 1 62LJi -M r ►u idr sk.o u 1 ...•• i J.+1 ... I-1av c;z.vv DESIGN REVIEW APPLY t JN CRITERIA The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each criterion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, attach additional response to this form. 1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site. RESPONSE: A. The building is located adjacent and parallel to Interurban Ave. to permit pedestrian and bicycle access. Street trees and grove of cherry trees enhance the street front. Page 2 B. Service areas are located behind the building and screen walls which extend in both directions parallel to the street. The sides and the back of the site are bermed and planted. C. The building maintains a one -story apparent height as much of the structure is buried or is below the public plaza. 2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. RESPONSE: A. The only nearby building is the Tukwila Shops building which has little design significance. This building is smaller. B. The perimeter of the site is landscaped. Special consideration is given to transition to the golf course. • C. There is no established neighborhood character, however, the newer office buildings are mostly of painted concrete and glass. D. The future sidewalk and bike trail have been integrated with the site, public plaza and art project. Service and operation areas are located away from public areas. E. On -site vehicle circulation is by operators only and is intermittent. LbUAriu Ur Hr►l.rii 1 Uri/AL i'{C. ViCYt DESIGN REVIEW APPL;(.TION • 3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encour- aged. . F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accom- plished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining land- scape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. RESPONSE: A. Site grading will include berms to blend with the golf course system of berms. access and a variety of seating options. Page 3 B. Gently sloping lawns, ramps and stairs are designed for safe C. Groves of flowering cherry trees are aligned on the building and and plaza grid system. Tree colorE and flower colors will accent the building and paving colors. D. Branches of trees in pedestrian corridors should be pruned to a height-of 7'. A 14' clearance should be provided at vehicle access points. Reinforced lawn will accommodate vehicle loads in the turn around area. E. Trees are integrated into the plaza by the grid system layout. F. Building related screen /walls are used primarily, as are shrubs. H. Site lighting will augment building lighting and will be used at points of entry to stairs and ramps. 4. BUILDING DESIGN A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring de- . velopments. • .�v mi .. 1 v. ' .�.v: u . —v a •-• r. : :Le.: 4 =r DESIGN REVIEW APPLI ( )N �_. Page 4 C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good pro- portions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all ex- posed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. RESPONSE: A. Careful attention to materials and details define this building as one element in a future continuous streetscape. B. One -story building height is equal or less than neighboring buildings. C. The street front elevation is highly articulated and proportioned to encourage public access. Fenestration is maximized on this side with variations of glass block patterns. D. The street front and public areas will consist of red brick, precast concrete, glass block and white accents. The operations side will be brick and painted concrete. E. A parapet shields the roof and screen walls hide the operations areas and equipment from the street. F. Night time lighting is achieved by back - lighting the glass block on the building and with the glass block light fixtures of the See C. screen wall. 5. • MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architec -• tural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. RESPONSE: Precast concrete benches are incorporated into plaza grid :-attern. Additional seating will be part of the Art Project. Site lighting is incorporated into the glass block elements of the building and screen wall. A drinking fountain will be one of the art•objects. DESIGN REVIEW APPLI ,. fION .:NTEkURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT Page 5 The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appearance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitali ze on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people - oriented use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth. Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this District. Use additional response space, if necessary. 1. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area. The landscaping of the site reflects and extends the golf course landscaping to the north. Other landscaping shapes and defines the site and public areas. No immediate landscape features currently exis- 2. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities. This project incorporates the future bike trail and sidewalk by encoviraging site access and use. This building provides a rest stop and point of interest along Interurban Avenue. 3. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site pedestrian circu- lation. Both stairs and ramps provide access to the plaza level and Art Project location. Proximity to the street and night lighting give convenient access and safety. Also, see No. 2. 4. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complementary to the district in which it is located. The design for this building deemphasizes the operational aspects of this structure and conversely emphasizes public use and interaction along the street front. 5. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse environmental im- pacts. The site plan separates and screens the operation areas.from the public areas and street front. The perimeter of the site provides A hi,ffPr to adjacent properties. Also, see No. 4. 6. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features in the area. Historic relationships are to be incorporated into the Art Project in the public plaza area. Specific objects, text and materials for these comissions will be determined at a later time. f D / �i rJ � '7 �Ii L�. ,�.�U'u 1 1C NDIT' r°`4AL USE JAN 07 1992 A PLICATION CITY OF TUKWILA I CITY OF 1UKVWILH � �pp of WING DEPT. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVE�6P'i- =F::`USE °ONL 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: (Replacement Facility.) 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) Interurban Avenue at Tukwila Shops (Volvo - White) Quarter: SE Section: 14 Township: 23N Range: 4E (This information may be found on your tax statement) 3. APPLICANT:* Name: METRO attn: Marc Dallas Address: 821 2ND. Ave. M/S 122 Seattle. WA. 98104 -1598 AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 Wastewater Pump Station Phone. 2 s . . :4- 3 Signature: 'Q--- a •.e�..Ci Date: 1.06.92 * The applicant is pers•n whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. 4. PROPERTY Name: OWNER Address: Phone: I /WE,[signature(s)] swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: ATTACHMENT J CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Page 2 ir - trunk sewer to the Renton treatment plant. enhance public welfare. '5. `PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: Not in use (vacant) 6. PROPOSED CONDTTIONAL USE REQUESTED (from list in TMC 18.64.020): Wastewater Pump Station 7. ADJACENT North: Foster Golf Links LAND South: Commercial USES East: Tukwila Shops West: Interurban Avenue (Commercial on opposite side of street) 8. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE (for example, describe the manufactur- ing processes used, wholesale /retail /warehouse functions, outside storage of goods or equipment or other information which will facilitate understanding of the activities you proposed to develop on this site): This facility is for pumping wastewater in the Tukwila 9. Will the conditional use be in operation and /or a building to house the use be started within a year of issuance of the permit? No, within 2 years. 10. Describe the manner in which you believe that your request for a Conditional Use Permit will satisfy each of the following criteria as specified in TMC 18.64.030 (attach additional sheets, if necessary). A. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. RESPONSE: This facility is primarily located below grade insuring limited public access and maximizing public safety. The public plaza, art project and access to the bike trail B. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. RESPONSE: This facility complies with all operation and performance standards required by the City for utilities. CONDITIONAL USE APPLI T TION 10. (continued) C. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. RESPONSE: This facility is being designed under the guidelines of the Interurban Special Review District and will be reviewed by the Board of Architectural Review. D. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. RESPONSE: This facility complies with the goals and policies for utilities outlined by the comprehensive land use plan. E. AU measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. RESPONSE: This facility emphasizes the street and public areas while de- emphasizing the visual and physical impact of the pumping station and its operations. Page •3 MIMInma J V. .. CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVE 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: (Replacement Facility) CITY OF TUKWILA 6 6 OPMfttiA DEPT. - TONDITI_ MAL USE PPLICA710N 00 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Teiephone: (206) 431 -3680 Wastewater Pump Station 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) Interurban Avenue at Tukwila Shops (Volvo - White) Quarter: SE Section: 14 Township: 23N Range: I E (This information may be found on your tax statement) 3. APPLICANT :* Name: METRO attn: Marc Dallas Address. 821 2ND. Ave. M/S 122 Seattle, PA. 98104 -1598 Phone. (2 ) 684 -1332 Signature: ' - a etarelC/ Date: 1.06.92 * The applicant is tl pers n whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY Name: OWNER Address: Phone: I /WE,[signature(s)] swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: CONDITIONAL USE APPfATION ( Page 2 5. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: Not in use (vacant) 6. PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED (from list in TMC 18.64.020): Wastewater Pump Station 7. ADJACENT North: Foster Golf Links LAND South: Commercial USES East: Tukwila Shops West: Interurban Avenue (Commercial on opposite side of street) 8. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE (for example, describe the manufactur- ing processes used, wholesale /retail /warehouse functions, outside storage of goods or equipment or other information which will facilitate understanding of the activities you proposed to develop on this site): This facility is for pumping wastewater in the Tukwila trunk sewer to the Renton treatment plant. 9. Will the conditional use be in operation and /or a building to house the use be started within a year of issuance of the permit? No, within 2 years. 10. Describe the manner in which you believe that your request for a Conditional Use Permit will satisfy each of the following criteria as specified in TMC 18.64.030 (attach additional sheets, if necessary). A. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. RESPONSE: This facility is primarily located below grade insuring limited public access and maximizing public safety. The public plaza, art project and access to the bike trail enhance public welfare. B. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. RESPONSE: This facility complies with all operation and performance standards required by the City for utilities. CONDITIONAL USE APP CATION ^•ATION Page 3 10. (continued) C. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. RESPONSE: This facility is being designed under the guidelines of the Interurban Special Review District and will be reviewed by the Board of Architectural Review. D. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. RESPONSE: This facility complies with the goals and policies for utilities outlined by the comprehensive land use plan. E. All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. RESPONSE: This facility emphasizes the street and public areas while de-emphasizing the visual and physical impact of the pumping station and its operations. CITY OF TUKWILA GHQ( S IN /TNCFNTKR fflta,l; S'A RP Tl ?KI}i1.1 11'1 S111NrTl1' 98188 December 18, 1991 Mr. Marc Dallas METRO 821 Second Ave., M.S. 112 Seattle, WA 98104 -1598 Re: Interurban Pump Station, 91 -8 -DR Dear Marc: Per out discussion earlier this week, this letter serves as confirmation L1'►aL a Conditional Use remit (CUP) in addition to Design Review, is required for the proposed pump station la accordance with Section 18.64.020 (12) of the Tukwila Zoning Code. Because the gravity sewer line and forcemain will be processed under separate permits, a CUP will also be required at that time. A CVO' xgquirea Pl rinni n>3 f� �mmi ein Pru1 nhvrt wnl . Both the CUD and Design Review can be heard by the Planning Commission /Board of Architectural Review concurrently. In order to prnc:AAd in a timely manner, the enolosod CUP application should be submitted as soon as possible. Information not provided with the Design Review aprlivaLiuti should be included with the CUP submittal in addition to the fee. R14G4ti'g f.' COO 4,79 IMO 0. , 1 1WCAMII..1lu Because a Sh1A review was not conducted by the City for the pump station, the fee paid by METRO can be credited toward the CUP fee ($850) resulting in a balance of $625.00. Donn Hogan of HDR Engineering, will be providing revised architectural drawings by Friday, December 21. The following must also be provided in addition to the CUP application by December 28: 1) two sets of mailing labels for property owners within a 300 - foot radius of the subject property; 2) Revised PMT's. Feel free to contact me if you have further questinns. MEM JAN 071992 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPT. Sincerely, Denni Shefrin, Associate Planner Fnc1.: CTJP Application CC: Jack Pace Sheldon Teel Donn Hogan. •••• ••• • vicinity map EXIST GOLF" LINKS ACCESS' ROAD. f15'" WIDE • (TO' BE ABANDONED AT COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT) - CONNECT NEW OLF:':LIN ACCESS ROAD 40 • THE''; `EXISTING, THIS •:AREA PROPOSED. TEMP CONSTRUCTION :EASEMENT BOUNDARY ' V SNEEtr.Ntl^ Wy PROPOSED EASEMENT BOUNDARY HDR Engineering, :Iric. And ,Associ cited Firms IIIIlII111IHH IIIIIIIIHIIIII IIIIIIIHIllU11mUH1IU11lllhI ELEVATION OD.oR 1oa EQUALS G..$. M STED i947) y PROPOSED PUMP STATION STAit0F1 Shi;rtf(ON EXIST INTERURBAN AVE. SO. R /VII 0 . U 11 1111111 11 1IIIU i11 11111111i 11 1111 1111 1111111 1 IIIIIliIIAI IIII II 1111 111111 I II r i 1 ? OO OOO C_ Lrtri°°e !:1 00°° :::::::: O • O ► ° CO30G °Teo; i i i ! :- i ° : ►O° 000 ►0 C►Oe00000 0 ON O_ p w ► . &_ e00e _4.404.4.041= . °OOOO °0 '00000 °0 000 / _ =k..4 4 O i = ► e 0 0 0 0 4 ► 0 0 0 0 _► 0 0 = i " " 0 0 0 040.04 i 0 1; ® 111111' 111111111®1 IIIIIIIIl11N1 1111111111111 ®Illlllillllltlllf IART PR JEOT =1111 III III II 111 ®IIIIIIIII1111111® 1111111111 1111111111111111111 1111® GRASS BL TYP, •. •..: .. — — 'BRICK`- PAVERS;'TYP" ovoee'= oi °o / ° = = eeo°•► < ► i ei RECOMMENDED:•:, CHECKED ,CONTRACT NO: WPAXX_92, PROPOSEDiTEMP; CONSTRUCTION.';- , ';•.;: EASEMENT BOUNDARY • III III III III III III III III III III III III III III. II-I III III III 0 1 9 3 . 1 pig 11} IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILVIII !IIIII I "IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII iii i i I `I i lI IF THIS MICROFILM.ED1 :DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN AM ISS; NOTICE, It.';;I DUES TQ I TH .. .-ITV OF `.THE. : :. - ORIGINALDOCUMENT 1tritm111IIIIIii>IllIlthiti llifMtlinI I iF' Iw iP ii wi ni igiIIii[ Il . . , CITYOF TUKWILA PROPERTY TEMF`iCON S TRUCTION EASEMENT' BOUNDARY: ;' e::: unicipality:- of Metropolitan ;Seattle, LIMITS OF:.TEMP .." CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ;':" FOR PUMP•, STATION -,APR 02; 1992 CITY,.;UF:I,UKWI , PLANNING. DE F' el% 11 (12) DOUGLAS FIR, 10-12' . DOUGLAS CONNECT' NI1Wptif)(1,41 ACCESS ROAD,40 THE EXISTING, THIS AREA • EASEMENT • GOLF LI KS) BARBERRt, 5 GAL / 7 / --------- POSED EMENT UNDARY / \ ODOR SCRUBBERS , (15) LAUREL, 2 GAL (17) ABELIA, 5 GAL PIG LAUNCHERS (16) ABELIA, '5 GAL WOOD 'BOLL (25) LAUREL SHRUBS— 2 GAL. IF THIS (CLEAR'THAN ,DUE :ITO EASEM Muniai of life INTERURBAN PROJECT REVISION H DR Engineering; Inc.. And . Asiociated Firm6 ELEVATION OM ,OR 100 10, EQUALS MEAN SEA LEVEL,1929 M.SC.& G.S.(AEMUSTED 1947) COORDINATES It BEARINGS ME BASED ON WASHINGTON. CO- • ORDiNA1E SYSTEM NORTH'IONE' RECOMMENDED: APPROVED; A PR 02 1992 'PLANNING DEPT.' 7 GLASS BLOCK LIGHT FIXTURES, TYP. PIG LAUNCHERS (IN FRONT) EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION ELIVATION .OR 1GO . ''CURLS MEAN .SEA EEVEL.1929 J•S.C.k G.S.(ADJuS1ED 1947) •COORDMATES:h.9EARINGS ARE BASED ON WASHINGTON CO- ORDINATE SYSTEM NORTH LONE ENDR• ST: ItU1 WASi11 ., 011 LOUVER, PAINTED (GRAY) BRICK, TYP. DESIGNED: 'r •REGDMMENDED: METAL SCREEN FENCE, PAINTED (WHITE) ODOR' SCRUBBERS (IN FRONT) HDR Engiheering, And Associated Firms NORTH ELEVATION IF ;THIS MICROF,ILM D DOCUMENT:;iS:;LESS: CLEAR° THAN aTHIS'N01`ICE;';ITII5EDUE:,TO YEAH SEA .EVE:.1929 U.S.C.& G.S.(ADJUSTED 1941) COORDINATES & 9EMINOS •ARE ' BASEO ON WASAINDTON CO•- OROINATE SYSTEM HORN ZONE METAL RAILING, PAINTE LOUVERS; PAINTED (GRAY) Municipality, of Metropolitan Seattle; INTERURBAN. PROJECT • EOIJALS MEAN SEA 1 EVEL.1929 cooRviori.s & BEAN INGS ARE BASED ON WASHINGTON CO, SYSTEM NORTW ZONE CISTERED • #.