Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit 90-01-CUP - CELLULAR ONE - CONDITIONAL USE
90-01-CUP SOUTH 158TH STREET NELSEN PLACE EPIC-5-90-T EPIC-6-90 CELLULAR ONE City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 - 1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor NOTICE OF DECISION FILE NUMBER: 90-1 -CUP APPLICANT: Interstate Mobile Company (Cellular One) REQUEST: Conditional Use approval for a 100 -foot monopole tower and a 12 -foot by 28 -foot concrete shelter cellular radio base station. LOCATION: Northeast corner of South 158th Street (Longacres Way) and Nelsen Place. The Planning Commission conducted a review of the above request on March 22, 1990, and approved the request, subject to the conditions that the monopole tower be sky blue. The Commission adopted the Findings and Conclusions contained in the staff report dated March 16, 1990. Any party aggrieved by this decision may appeal the decision to the City Council by filing an appeal in writing with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the above date and shall state the reasons for the appeal. Darren Wilson, Assistant Planner March 23, 1990 * MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPIoldED. -3- Mr. Hamilton said one approach would be to make up a committee comprised of Councilmembers and Planning Commission members and arrive at a decision. Mr. Kirsop said if more residents are needed the size of the membership could be increased to nine members and still have two business representatives on the Commission. V 90 -1 -CUP - Request for Conditional Use approval to construct a cellular radio base station on the northeast corner of S. 158th Street (Longacres Way) and Nelsen Place.. Darren Wilson,Assistant Planner, reviewed the proposal recommending approval of the cellular radio base station with the condition that the Monopole tower color should be sky blue. Chairman Haggerton asked if anyone from Embassy Suites has complained about the tower. Darren Wilson said they had no complaints. Gary Wayne representating Cellular One stated he has read the Staff Report and agrees with it. During the course of application we discussed a three - legged tower. Staff expressed some concern with that so they submitted plans for the 100' tower with whip antennas. The antenna will be housed within the structure. His company supports the recommendations. Mr. Knudson asked if the structure or power levels would be a health hazard? , Gary Jayne said the power levels will be very low. The power level will be far less than a microwave oven. During review it was agreed there would be no health impact. Mr. Hamilton "asked if there are any of the towers around the area. Gary Wayne answered there are thirty -eight in the greater Puget Sound area. Mr. Hamilton asked if this will be the only one in the Tukwila area. Mike Riley, Cellular One, said they have no plans for any other towers in Tukwila. The bulk of use will be near arterials. There are plans to go to more sophisticated equipment that will not require buildings. Chairman Haggerton closed the Public Hearing at 9:05 p.m. Mr. Hamilton asked if there was any way the tower could be undergrounded. Gary Wayne said that would be impossible. Mr. Cagle said he could not think of a better place to put the tower. Mr. Kirsop said since it is a steel structure grey would likely be a better color choice. Jack Pace, Senior Planner, said it was the recommendation of the Planning Division that sky blue would blend in better. MR. CAGLE MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE APPLICATION OF 90 -1 -CUP, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CELLULAR RADIO BASE STATION SUBJECT TO STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. * Staff recommendations are as follows: 1. The Monopole tower color shall be sky blue. HEARING DATE: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: ACREAGE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: SEPA DETERMINATION: ATTACHMENTS: K City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor STAFF REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Prepared March 16, 1990 March 22, 1990 90 -1-CUP Interstate Mobile Phone Company Conditional Use approval to construct a cellular radio base station. Northeast corner of South 158th Street (Longacres Way) and Nelsen Place. .18 acres Light Industrial M -1 Light Industrial A Mitigation of Nonsignificance was issued March 9, 1990. A. Site Plan B. Elevations C. Landscape Plan D. Utilities & Grading Plan (will be submitted at Planning Commision meeting) STAFF REPORT �. to the Planning Commission 90 -1 -CUP: Page 2 FINDINGS VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION 1. Project Description: To install a cell base site consisting of a 100 foot tower with three 15 -foot high "whip" antennas. A 12 by 28 foot concrete shelter to house electronic equipment and a 6 foot high chain link fence with perimeter landscaping. 2. Existing Land Use: The northern portion used as warehouse storage /office and parking for Rawson Drugs. The southern portion is vacant. 3. Surrounding Land Use: North - Rawson Drugs, John's Furniture, and Mueller Brass South - Vacant land (zoned C -2 Regional Retail) East - Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way, Longacres racetrack West - Puget Sound Power & Light Transmission lines, Daniel Boone Paints, Inc., Service America Crop. 4. Terrain: The site is essentially flat with less than a 2% slope on the site. The Eastern portion of the site is approximately 15' high along the railroad embankment. A portion of the lease area has been filled with approximately 12 to 18 inches of gravel. BACKGROUND The Interstate Mobile Phone Company is proposing to construct a cellular radio base station (cell site). This unmanned facility consists of a 100 foot tower with three "whip" antennas attached to the top of the monopole; a 12 by 28 foot concrete shelter to house electronic monitoring equipment; and a chain link fence enclosing the monopole tower and shelter for security purposes. A Mitigated SEPA determination was issued on March 9, 1990. Below are the conditions: 1. Based upon the applicant's soils report, dated January 11, 1990, prepared by Rittenhouse & Zeman Associates, Inc. Geotechnical & Environmental Consultants, recommended deeper foundation supports for the building /tower, and all piles should be driven under the full time observation of the soils engineer and pile capacity should be confirmed with an appropriate dynamic pile driving formula. 2. No protest drainage LID Agreement is required for the conversion of the temporary tower to permanent tower. DECISION CRITERIA The Conditional Use criteria are shown below in bold, along with a staff discussion of relevant facts. STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission 18.60.050: GENERAL REVIEW CRITERIA. 90-1 -CUP: Page 3 (1) The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated; APPLICANT RESPONSE: 'The proposed facility will be located approximately from the West Valley Highway. The location of the proposed tower for cell base site will be immediately to the east of the existing Puget Power Sound and Light high - voltage transmission line easement. The 115- foot proposed tower is estimated to be lower in overall height than the existing P.S.P. and L. high- voltage towers and from a distance will be largely indistinguishable from the high- voltage towers. The 12 by 28 foot shelter and chain link fence are consistent with the industrial development that are permitted under the M -1 zoning designation. This proposed facility will be an excellent neighbor. The reason being it does not generate significant amounts of traffic nor, generate noise or odor which may impact other adjoining properties. The applicant has indicated that it would be difficult to locate the tower in other locations. Since the major area of focus are I -5, I-405 and West Valley Interchange. Since the proposed location is behind to the east future development and along the West Valley Highway will not be impacted to any greater degree, than to the present circumstances. " STAFF RESPONSE: Staff agrees with the applicant's findings. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy; APPLICANT RESPONSE: 'The proposed facility meets the existing performance standards contained in the Tukwila Zoning Code (i.e. setbacks, landscaping)." STAFF RESPONSE: Under the M -1 (Light Industrial) the required landscaping is 15 feet in the front yard only. The applicant has included 15 feet of landscaping in the front and 5 feet around the rest of the development. The setbacks for this zone is 25 feet. The applicant has a minimum of 41 feet in the front yard. Since this development is an unmanned facility no parking is required. The applicant has created one parking stall for the service vehicle. .% STAFF REPORT STAFF RESPONSE: to the Planning Commission APPLICANT RESPONSE: Since this facility is an unmanned. The proposed development does not require pedestrian route. Therefore, no additional foot traffic will be generated. (4) The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan; APPLICANT RESPONSE: 90 -1 -CUP: Page 4 (3) The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design; 'The surrounding land uses are older industrial buildings and electrical power poles and lines. The cellular tower and shelter will blend in with the existing industrial and utility uses adjacent to the development. Because of the new construction occurring along West Valley Highway,the proposed monopole will not be significantly visible. The reasoning being the location of this monopole tower. Again, this site will be unmanned. The base /concrete shelter will be screened with landscaping approved by the Planning Department. The major traffic will occur during construction. The construction period should be 4- 5 weeks. The hours of construction will range from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Once the construction has been completed. The site will be visited semi- monthly for maintenance by one individual. " "There are no specific goals and policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan which address this type of utility. However, the proposal does improve the overall cellular system by increasing capacity and providing the users within the Tukwila area with improved quality of service which is a general goal of the plan for Transportation /Utility Element of the Plan." STAFF RESPONSE: The Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan does not address this type of development. (5) All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located; ti ( STAFF REPORT \.. 90 -1 -CUP: to the Planning Commission Page 5 APPLICANT RESPONSE: 'The proposed site immediately to the east of Puget Sound Power and Light Company's high - voltage transmission towers allows the proposed 115 foot tower to blend in with those towers so as not to be obtrusive. This would be difficult to achieve in many other locations in the vicinity. The proposed location is behind (to the east) so that future development along the West Valley Highway (such as the new Hampton Inn facility) will not be impacted to any greater degree than exists with the present circumstance.The small 12 by 28 foot, one story concrete shelter includes an attractive exposed aggregate finish and is consistent with the existing warehouse structures in the vicinity." STAFF RESPONSE: Due to the height and size of the power lines, the proposed monopole will blend in with the surrounding uses. The applicant proposed sky blue or grey for the color of the monopole tower. CONCLUSIONS 1. Criteria 1: Due to the location and type of proposed use, there will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity. 2. Criteria 2: The applicant has exceeded the requirements for the landscaping, setbacks and the parking per City's standards. 3. Criteria 3: Since the proposed facility is unmanned, it should be compatible with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation. 4. Criteria 4: Since there are no applicable policies that deal with the specific request, the request for a conditional use permit would not adversely affect the implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. 5. Criteria 5: The applicant has addressed all measures in minimizing any adverse impacts for this area. The applicant has provided two colors of choice and staff preferred the sky blue over the gray color. RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Division recommends approval of the cellular radio base station, with the following condition: 1. The Monopole tower color shall be sky blue. SOUTI! ELEVATION r 10' to0 r .,.rlin.. - •n+rnt 1...r(110'to 118't„ 37' IZ' • EE' • 10' C ancr.to 61.di•r It' /`IS vu. c,ts Farms PERM. v EIN h.... 436 iGALE I "•I0' nu Lmt..r •I.,,1m.n1 oo 5 •ac. n.L.ry CEL IT S { or TIJKWU 4 � DEFT geC, W i. 3 - - .:o Q 18101 WAVE GUID 6KIPGE DETAIL GROUND ROD DETAIL TUKWILA 200243-8511 elevation detail [AS w.o7 - 7 : AW16 W 11S - t.Yl S TYE S5YI YC l 11 J 4, 11b1N 41 Planting Plan sin mg.n LT+1.L 09111011 /10571ICAL 03.01 01115. 1)00.0020 0.12015100 171A250 71MMt r 5x0571 82011. onon.. 1 1 I /4 LA 0001+ MUT - .ri MINUS IOMIOTLO 11.1121'1 .1171171 SACK T0G£I.f I-1 US TILL -"i N mA rtTA1 TNDeN /025.14!2 + + 1011 11.1. 100 O 0.1 02M elm wP MO71MJU1lLPR.11 a 11-10 PA at.. P[nlLVC SIMMt III .eOIAG ruff /000Nb011 11 - ]0' w ruu. .' l a4:vf 01AMMDf' f5W lal 011o0000O.1 1117•10 SS -]I' C3.[ TOLL r IOUT.OIA '0.141=0 07.1ei I 10 - 20' our 1[RTI.55111 MOUND COIMAI 010.120 11/7/001120 NQS[ '1!100 aT plantIng Nolasa 1. ALL TMCIIIOM A. 4•1=2 USED 110x11G TM 010000!0717 Or TM 1!1[04100 POP.. Or 1771 110115 MALL S[ Of 0107 OALOT AA 11002471 TO T. STAND.. OF T3.[ 01on.T MD ALL AMC. Or III LAADAUJIM7 MT SC S.M. TO TM x10171 ASO 14110VAL O TM • 1101 ■712TH.. 2. ALL SAWS AND 010000 COV71 AILS 1M.. 1107.1. 1 0t 1141 Or Si[ 170711 II'I O 201 TOP SOIL IOCIAPONAT01 1010 TP1 00115000 SOIL. 71121 RAR- 0G 20001/ GALL UVM AS TM01I 1/NAL 11PACI. A 110 100 In LAO or 30110 r001. our Own VAN 0210 SUCH AA . 1SAN77 NM' CO .UAL. 701 NO TOP SOIL TO M UM O 710 P.tf[t MALL M A GOOD MlM 012014 MAN= LAM TTM TOP SOIL MM O I. 0171 STA. MO OTC= 01.7.1 01101 I 1000 1' . TO O TS T SOIL 0101 M 0 70 .T 01 0OS 00 M 10 0 T 100 [100 11 IOCIA OIOG TA[ TI TOP .IL TO 0 1013 1107 100 ELM.. 010 12 POSS.. [ '37 0 0 011 0'. ASO 010 .0.11 O TM NO T TOLL PM 71C 1St. SOIL, IL• * 11011. OTICIS 0 042.1.00 00501011 /JAG. MA MS 710 11 IN AR DIA... IMAM M AO.= AS ran or SM 000S710. C 1 '0004&1 0x. 71 111x IU 4)011 TOR M m Tm SARI. MILI sM ALL M ON A S 0.9 .14. -I1NA. NA OP 05 M.w R ArT.T 1L PASt NOT TOP SOIL; 011 TIN! YRR 021.01 OS S.1307. AA. 01 =MST= CON M Dr //00710771 1T1121IO0. 5. 110 01 0 1001!1. 0[ T TRIPS S * APO MRUSS, A TA SI 70022*[ TIPS IOOIL- 1iO MALL M 1 Ti , x0 7114 TI 010'110 001)0 AS POI SM 11.IACT21n• 7.0/0404.1101.. 7.0/0404.1101.. . MIA MT... GALL AL A11 &.'.410071 IT 'AC.' ON .SAL. . TAI[ 111021 MING A3. CALL. OR 0 T1[ 5. SMALL M T0[ 1152010 ] /1 01 1A11 I' - 15121 'OSOSCAR 0 5. O 7ACCIRM * '20x0 T. 07712. 1 I .O. INC.' O RO M APP01 ULL. IISTALTICN 01 =ALL M AS eIXA1t6 P T 0.0 00.1412001 1 . 70 01 2 TAUS IS TO A[ PA 171 OPTION. T. T0[ L 11011 I 0 015)0. 11111.1 111.. 1 * u 01002 roe run= AIS 1:MTeOC- TIM Owtf TO A 000011 um11.. •tx 0/001004/0 PAx1sf MT TOD TO 11421501 L717. AM MALL CLOP O n[ WTI. PRIOR 10 'ANAL 24520110. f. 77C LANDS.. NIrmace MALL M ...PI= TOP TM 077...11001 - ASO Or AM W O THIS 1045 710 M 1 T TIM Or INSTALL- ATION PIM 17C I 7 MAM. II 1S AC AC TO 07 IT m Oul171. 71IS LIPT00IAYR 0.1+. • O 71410 11 0 MAI[MAIM.. 1 ®AAG or snug Anus, SARI. A. CLAMING 00 R T0 A. M CLASS £PF 01150. PAD 0170 TICOLIILLLT 2041110 NM.. 1111009101111. I. ALL PLV1 05501121 UM O 7120 PAOO.T 100. M IN Coo 0112. 000005071 AT 711 TIM Of £1!.001. 010 I1.,. M .2.21001 MM 01 N IA MA AMA TAM MAL ACCM MAM R TS. 0110. Ir .R FLA. NATO - /AL IS FOOD TO 1001. eO1.41.1O0 0111I. PIZ GDUARM '7120 1110.10 T II IISAl2 Ow. DISUSED 011 AIN..1 TA[ strummer MTOtAL SMALL II [[ACILT A3. OIGIA.LL2 SPMC.1. AS 10 TIPS 510 IN T MCA 71 7[. 1 T X . A S L MOT: HMA IL<[ [[ Tw' 0104 2PN1I71 C) • MMOMMMe MOMS • BIM • : e® ■k■ • • m8E.. • mNE.0 • • mumMEME Cellular One Sincerely, March 21, 1990 Jack Pace Community Development Department City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Conditional Use Permit for Cellular One facility South 158th Street and Nelson Place Dear Mr. Pace: Included with this letter are 9 sets of site plan drawings including a grading plan. Also enclosed is a complete set of 8 1/2 X 11 reduced plans. The site plans do not show existing utilities. There are presently no existing utilities. These will be engineered by the electric company and telephone company. If you have further questions please contact either Gary Wayne or myself at 283 -8319. Carol Rohde Zoning Coordinator 101 Elliott Ave., Suite 435 Seattle, WA 98109 206/283-8319 C MAR 211990 CITY G . • • • - 41r kV. `SL \LLY A 12 -FOOT BY 28 -FOOT CONCRETE SHELTER WITH A WASHED ROCK FINISH. THIS FACILITY IS SURROUNDED BY A 10- FOOT ANTI - CLIMB Cl IAIN LINK FENCE. ATTACHMENT G BA UM • :% son • te e■ ■■ • ;asp■■ • Me UN • saesMUM Cellular One March 5, 1990 Dear Jack, Sincerely, GAW /gw Attachments Mr. Jack P. Pace Senior Planner Department of Community Development CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: 90 -1 -CUP; Tower Color Alternatives Gary A. W Zoning C inator 101 Elliott Ave., Suite 435 Seattle, WA 98109 206/283.8319 Please give me a call and let me know your preference! As per your request, our purchasing agent has received color alternatives from our tower manufacturer. They are being forwarded to you with this letter. O ROSE QUARTZ • CHINA WHITE (1,3) BISQUE CLAY TINT (1,2,3,4) rR .:A s. DECK RED (2,4) MC-1 LRV 69% MC-2 LRV 82% (C) 1MN9. Thn rnn,n ,.n„ LIGHT BUFF MC -3 WHEAT LRV 75% MC -4 •SHELL LRV 57% MC -5 *SULPHUR (1,2,3) LRV 65% MC -6 TALLOW LRV 22% MC -7 LRV 10% MC -8 LRV 9% *CHROME YELLOW (1,2,3,4) MC-11 *IVORY (1,3) LRV 56% MILLING YELLOW MC -14 LRV 73% •YELLOW PASTEL (1,2,3,4) MC -16 MARSH LRV 81% MC-17 LRV 51% MC -10 *FLAX LRV 65% MC -12 QUINCE LRV 69% MC -13 •ABSINTHE LRV 78% MC -15 LIMESTONE (3) LRV 69% LINDEN FERN (2,4) GREENERY (2,3,4) COPPER (2,4) MC -9 GOLD INGOT MC -18 LRV 14% LRV 45% • For best hiding, two coats may be required over contrasting colors. (1) Not available in Tile -Clad® II Enamel (BAC) (2) Interior only (844) (3) Interior only (BAC) (4) Lead containing and lead free versions available in (844) system. Lead containing colors not to be used for domestic, institutional, educational or recreational facilities. For industrial use only) MC -19 TUNDRA LRV 78% MC -20 GREENLAND LRV 84% MC -21 LRV 72% MC -22 PINE LRV 77% MC -23 LRV 38% MC -24 HEMLOCK LRV 82% MC -25 WINTERGREEN LRV 70% MC -26 LRV 41% MC -27 LRV 49% JADE SPEARMINT *EMERALD CEDAR GREEN MC -28 LRV 66% MC -30 LRV 32% MC -31 LRV 15% MC -32 LRV 68% MC -33 LRV 47% MC -34 LRV 65% MC -35 LRV 10% MC -36 LRV 7% The quality of the work environment has a c productivity. Color when properly used, wor • Improving employee morale • Enhancing customer and public ima • Relieving eye fatigue • Promoting good housekeeping • Contributing to safety Simultaneously, color can be both function Considerations in selecting colors include hue, visibility, surface, light reflectance, lo and purpose. The tables below outline characteristics and of various colors, light reflectance values an This information can help you make more color. All colors are selected from Sherwin MONDE II, industry's new, broad institutior cial color selection. Hundreds of additional E Industrial Maintenance Finish Colors are a a tint /base system. Reflectance Values Recommended for Plant Surfaces Surfaces Ceilings 80 -90 Walls 55 -65 Floors 15 -30 Machinery 30 -50 Desk Tops Gloss Ratings Coating Damp Surface Enamel Direct to Metal Enamel Epoxy Mastic Enamel Galvite Paint Heavy Duty Epoxy Enamel Hi Bild Aliphatic Polyurethane Hi Bild Chlorinated Rubber Enamel Hi Bild Vinyl Finish Industrial Water Based Acrylic Paint Industrial Enamel Kern® A &A Epoxy Finish Metalatex® Semi -Gloss Enamel Metalastic® II Enamel Silicone Alkyd Enamel • Reflectance Manufacturing Areas Tile -Clad® II Catalyzed Epoxy Enamel Tile -Clad® II Catalyzed Epoxy Eg -Shel Enamel Water Based Catalyzed Epoxy Professional Co 5 As part of Sherwin- Williams total customer aesthetical pleasing and functional color th Take advantage of our free service by con) IC -28 66% 1C -29 50% AC -30 / 32% AC-31 J 15% '.1C-32 68% i; 33 •'47% MO-34 65% MG -35 ;V 10% MC -36 LRV 7% • ( • Industrial Maintenance ` k:oatings !r: Austry • Commerce • Institutions • New Construction • Repaint • Maintenance d(. SIENNA WALNUT BROWN (2,4) LIGHT BARK PRAIRIE CORK MESA DESERT SAND WHITE SAND MC -37 DEEP UMBER LRV 11% MC -38 LRV 6% MC -39 CANVAS LRV 32% MC -40 SIERRA TAN LRV 64% MC -41 LRV 35% MC -42 LRV 55% MC -43 LRV 57% MC -44 LRV 58% PEARL BIRCH WHITE MAPLE TAN GOLDEN EARTHEN MC-46 LRV 12% MC -48 LRV 63% MC -49 LRV 45% MC -50 LRV 75% MC -51 LRV 69% ..0.� "F "4 i7 MC -52 LRV 43% MC -53 LRV 46% MC -54 LRV 35% (5) Not available in Metalastic II Enamel, Silicone Alkyd Enamel, Direct To Metal Enamel, or Water Based Catalyzed Epoxy. (6) Package Color Contains Lead. Not to be used for domestic, institutional, educational, or recreational facilities, For Industrial use only. Alternate Lead Free products are available in Industrial Enamel quality. CLOVE FAWN SPICE BEIGETONE DUSTY PEACH MC -56 LRV 46% MC -57 LRV 30% MC -58 LRV 56% COBBLESTONE MC -60 LRV 41% TAUPE MC -55 SILVERY LRV 30% MC -61 LRV 27% MC -64 LRV 63% TOWER GRAY SMOKE SLATE GRAY EBONY MC -65 LRV 19% LRV 45% MC -67 LRV 30% Ck�ut� '.w`'�izf.��4�MISM 7ix MC -59 GREYSTONE MC -68 LRV 63% LRV 43% MC -71 LRV 40% MC -72 LRV 8% Color approximates the appearance of the actual coating. Factors such as type of product, degree of gloss, texture, size and shape of area, lighting, heat, or method of application may cause color variance. Performance of certain colors may be affected by specific exposure environments. SEAWARD CERULEAN TURQUOISE RE lL POND ; BLUE SURF LIGHT TEAL (2) Products available using Blend -A -Col Direct To Metal Enamel, Industr *an Metalatex Semi -Gloss Enamel, ne Products available using Nuodex Chr Epoxy Mastic Enamel, Heavy Duty Epo; Hi -Bild Chlorinated Rubber Enamel, TilE Chroma Chem® is a registered tradema MC -74 LRV 54% MC -75 DELFT LRV 34% MC-76 VAPOR LRV 23% MC -77 FROST BLUE LRV 75% MC -78 LRV 72% MC -79 HARBOR LRV 28% MC -80 LRV 69% MC -81 INDIGO LRV 29% MARITIME GREY BLUE ARCTIC BLUE intenance MC -64 LRV 63% MC -66 LRV 45% MC -68 LRV 43% MC -69 LHV 48% MC -70 V 67 MC -71 LRV 40% MC -72 LRV 8% al coating. Factors e, size and cation may cause lay be MC -65 SEAWARD LRV 19% MC -67 TURQUOISE LRV 30% AZURE MILL POND PERSIAN BLU SURF LIGHT TEAL (2) , ailable using Blend -A -Color colorants (BAC): ::tal Enamel, Industrit amel, KEM A &A Epoxy Enamel, Metalastic camel, .'rni -Gloss Enamel, ne Alkyd Enamel, Tile -Clad II Enamel, Water ased Catalyzed Epoxy. available using Nuodex Chrome Chem® 844 colorants (844): Enamel, Heavy Duty Epoxy Enamel, Hi -Bild Aliphatic Polyurethane, ';hlorinated Rubber Enamel, Tile Clad II Enamel. Limited colors available in Hi -Bild Vinyl. Chris ai Criema is a registered trademark of Nuodex, Inc. LRV 49% MC -74 LRV 54% MC-77 ,L, 75% MC -80 LRV 69% TIDAL BLUE MARITIME FROST BLUE GREY BLUE HARBOR ARCTIC BLUE MC-82 LRV 53% MC -83 MC -86 LRV 53% MC -88 LRV 23% MC -89 LRV 26% MC - 81 INDIGO MC -90 LRV 29% LRV 7% Safety Colors •SAFETY YELLOW (2,4,5,6) SAFETY RED (2,4,5,6) SAFETY ORANGE (2,4,5,6) BRILLIANT WHITE (DAMP SURFACE ENAMEL B52W1) BLUE BRITE GREEN BRITE LRV 28% LRV 11% INTERNATIONAL ORANGE (2,4,5,6) LRV 17% LRV 17% LRV 86% PURE WHITE LRV 85% (INDUSTRIAL WATER BASED ACRYLIC PAINT B42W110) B59SW2 SILVER BRITEa' B59S11 B59SW1 •SAFETY GREEN SAFETY BLUE BLACK Primers LRV 29% LRV 17% Actual primer color will vary depending on product. These chips are approximate representations only. LRV 0% LRV 36% MC -87 r --- Aluminums -- ZINC CLAD& ETHYL SILICATE B69V1 /B69D2 ZINC CHROMATE KEM KROMIK•' WHITE B50W1 INDUSTRIAL ALUMINUM PAINT B59S4 GALVITE PAINT B50W3 KROMIK•' E41N1 KEM KROMIKI B50N2 TILE -CLAD® B62N71 HI -BILD CHLORINATED RUBBER 863N11 LATEX METAL PRIMER B42N8 UNIVERSAL METAL PRIMER B50N6 B50Y1 • • Ea . I` Puttin g Color To Work S L F Walls • The quality of the work environment has a direct bearing on productivity. Color when properly used, works by: • Improving employee morale • Enhancing customer and public image • Relieving eye fatigue • Promoting good housekeeping • Contributing to safety Simultaneously, color can be both functional and aesthetic. Considerations in selecting colors include: lighting, gloss, hue, visibility, surface, light reflectance, location, harmony and purpose. The tables below outline characteristics and suggested uses of various colors, light reflectance values and sheen ratings. This information can help you make more effective use of color. All colors are selected from Sherwin- Williams BEAU MONDE® II, industry's new, broad institutional and commer- cial color selection. Hundreds of additional BEAU MONDE II Industrial Maintenance Finish Colors are available through a tint /base system. Reflectance Values Recommended for Plant Surfaces Surfaces Ceilings Floors Machinery 30 -50 Gloss Ratings Coating Reflectance Values Manufacturing Office Areas Areas 80 -90 80 -90 55 -65 60 -70 15 -30 25 -40 Desk Tops 40 -50 Initial Gloss @ 60 degrees (units ± 10) Damp Surface Enamel 90 Direct to Metal Enamel 55 Epoxy Mastic Enamel 70 Galvite Paint 0 -10 Heavy Duty Epoxy Enamel 50 Hi Bild Aliphatic Polyurethane 80 Hi Bild Chlorinated Rubber Enamel 60 Hi Bild Vinyl Finish 10 I. Industrial Water Based Acrylic Paint 10 Industrial Enamel 70 Kern® A &A Epoxy Finish 85 MetalatexP' Semi -Gloss Enamel 45 Metalastic® II Enamel 80 ' Silicone Alkyd Enamel 85 Tile -Clad® II Catalyzed Epoxy Enamel 90 Tile -Clad® II Catalyzed Epoxy Eg -Shel Enamel 35 Water Based Catalyzed Epoxy 80 Professional Color Styling Characteristics and Suggested Uses for Various Colors Color WARM COLORS Red, Attract attention, Orange, create excitement, Yellow promote cheerful ness, stimulate action. COOL COLORS Blue, Turquoise, Green LIGHT COLORS Off - Whites and Pastel Tints DARK COLORS Deep Tones, Make objects seem Gray, heavier, absorb Black light. Will make room appear smaller and sur- roundings cramped. Long exposure will create monotony and depression. BRIGHT COLORS Notable Yellow, Yellow Green, Orange, Red Orange, Red WHITE Impression Cool, relaxing, refreshing, peaceful, quieting, encourage concentration. Make objects seem lighter in weight; areas seem more spacious. Will usu- ally give people a psychological lift. Reflect more light than darker tones. The purer these colors are, the more compellingly they attract the eye. Make objects appear larger and create excitement. Pure, denotes cleanliness, reflects more light than any other color. Suggested use for Interiors Non - production areas including employee entrances, corridors, lunch rooms break areas, locker rooms, etc. Production areas, maintenance shops, boiler rooms, etc. Most production areas, especially small rooms, hallways, and warehouse and storage areas. Poorly illuminated rooms. Not normally recommended for large areas because of light absorption qualities. Use should be confined to small background areas where contrast is needed. Complement to basic wall colors; small objects such as doors, columns, graphics, time clocks, time -card racks, bulletin boards, tote boxes, dollies, etc. All ceilings and overhead structures, and rooms where maximum light reflection is needed. Can also be used on small objects for greater contrast. (• As part of Sherwin- Williams total customer service, we provide, at no charge, complete industrial color programs .. . aesthetical pleasing and functional color that can improve employee morale, reduce energy costs and increase production! ( Take advantage of our free service by contacting your nearest S -W representative. Austria! Maintenance Coating Systems he broad line of Sherwin - Williams Industrial Maintenance Coatings is engineered to provide solutions to your precise requirements in field painting structures of all types and functions. Many of these coatings have been developed to provide specific characteristics on specific surfaces in specific exposure conditions. Whether the need is for effective protection against chemical contact, physical abuse, or corrosive atmospheric exposure; whether the substrate is previously finished or new, there is a Sherwin- Williams Industrial Maintenance Coating System which will extend the life of your investment. Sherwin- Williams has accomplished a major color technology breakthrough to allow you to select spectacular colors without sacrificing protection quality. This selection, which suggests contemporary yet proven colors for institutions, commercial, and industrial usage is available in the following Sherwin- Williams Coating Systems. DIRECT to METAL ENAMEL — A corrosion resistant, high build alkyd coating designed to give primer and finish coat protection in one coat. EPDXY MASTIC ENAMEL — A high solids catalyzed epoxy coating designed to provide a high performance system over marginally prepared surfaces. HEAVY DUTY EPDXY ENAMEL — A polyamide catalyzed epoxy designed to provide high build, high performance protection against atmospheric exposure to chemicals, stains, abrasion and moisture. HIGH BILD ALIPHATIC POLYURETHANE — An isocyanate /acrylic resin coating designed for high performance with exterior -gloss and color retention. For use as a heavy duty interior and exterior structural coating. HI -BILD CHLORINATED RUBBER — A chlorinated rubber system for corrosive, chemical and moisture rich environment protection on structures and equipment. INDUSTRIAL ENAMEL — An interior /exterior multiple purpose, fast dry, alkyd gloss enamel. It's toughness, fume, moisture, abrasion and weather resistance provide for industrial, commercial and institutional applications. KEM® A &A EPDXY ENAMEL — A single package, modified epoxy enamel for use where mild chemicals and fumes limit the use of alkyd systems. METALATEXt`"' SEMI -GLOSS ENAMEL — A water based acrylic enamel having outstanding exterior gloss and color retention. Ideal for tanks, processing equipment, architectural surfaces, galvanized duct work as well as concrete and steel roof decks. METALASTIC® II ENAMEL — A high build, long oil alkyd for general exterior use on tanks, bridges, structural steel and other large metal and wood objects. SILICONE ALKYD ENAMEL — A siliconized, alkyd enamel designed to give exceptional exterior gloss and color retention. It is particularly suited for use in areas of intense sunlight, high humidity and petroleum vapors. TILE - CLAD® II ENAMEL — A two package catalyzed epoxy coating for use where chemical, stain, abrasion or moisture resistancTMre• req `aired WATER' BA060 CATALYZED EPDXY — A high performance catalyzed epoxy coating for interior or exterior use in ' .. moderate commercial, institutional or industrial environments. It is particularly suitable for upgrading conventionally uaii :;d surfaces to a high performance, tile like, protection system without lifting or bleeding. 'Ht •'WIN- WILLIAMS ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES — Coordinate protection and appearance of heavy service facilities Sherwin Williams Conventional Finishes; complete lines of interior and exterior latex and alkyd coatings. Each is •ed to complement Industrial Maintenance Coatings; together they will optimize any maintenance program. Industrial Maintenance Products include: . TAR EPDXY C200 — A high build polyamide cured epoxy coating meeting corps of engineers formula C -200. P.." :SURFACE ENAMEL — A high gloss, mildew and fungus resistant synthetic resin coating for use on interior damp .1' MASTIC ALUMINUM — A high solids, aluminum pigmented catalyzed epoxy coating for marginally prepared steel i . !. 11 PAINT— An acrylic vehicle coating designed to provide excellent adhesion to galvanized surfaces in mild industrial ,;Id commercial environments. :1 BILD VINYL SYSTEM — Vinyl protection for acidic, salt water, and industrial service. HI - MIL SHER- TAR' "' EPDXY ENAMEL — A high build, coal tar catalyzed epoxy coating for water immersion service as used on oil rigs, darn gates, and sewage treatment equipment. HI- SOLIDS CATALYZED EPDXY — A polyamide catalyzed epoxy for severe chemical exposure and specific immersion service. INDUSTRIAL WATER BASED ACRYLIC PAINT — A 100% acrylic emulsion containing a non -toxic corrosion inhibitor. It can be used as a primer under most water based topcoats or alone as a primer /topcoat system. SILVER- BRITE ALUMINUMS — Five aluminum paints providing appearance, corrosion, and high heat protection. ZINC CLAD' " PRIMERS — A series of long -term galvanic protection steel primers. Consult your nearest Sherwin - Williams store for specific product recommendations to meet your requirements. The Sherwin - Williams Company SEll Cleveland, Ohio Date 8.87 1100030 Litho in U.S.A. 3/1/90 Mr. Muscarella: Mr. Richard Muscarella C/O Cellular One Seattle 101 Elliott Ave. West Suite 435 Seattle, Washington 98119 The attached color samples (even though small) should give you some idea of color and gloss. We can matte colors down but the darker the matte the softer the silicone alkyd topcoat becomes. I have also enclosed a Sherwin Williams color brochure so you can get some color shade comparisons. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. cc: Tim Gooding File Power Structures, Inc. 11 006000 0,nLIEZ:]01120110 DIVISION LeBla Hobson Galvanizing Division of Power Structures I :Pi I Power Structures, Inc. P.O. Box 6261 • New Orleans, Louisiana 70174 • (504) 394 -7433 • Telefax: (504) 391 -9692 A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Lapp Insulator Company 4y'P4i111,12..1 f /r Cellular W Dear Mr. Pace: BACKGROUND P.O. Box 9159 Seattle, WA 98109.0159 100 West Harrison, Suite 500 Seattle, WA 98119 TB B 20 1990 ► 3 January 30, 1990 r. Jack Pace _ _- - - --- e ���� no Community Development Department ■��■ I City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd ��o:iii • Tukwila WA 98188 +a■■.■ ■ Re: Conditional Use application for Cell Site Facility South 158th Street & Nelsen Place This letter accompanies an application for a Conditional Use to establish a Cellular Radio Base Station (cell site) facility in an M -1 zone, Light Industry located at South 158th Street and Nelsen Place in Tukwila, Washington. The particulars of our application are more fully outlined in the Application, Environmental Checklist, and drawings which are included in the package of submittals The purpose of this letter is to offer a brief explanation of McCaw Cellular Communications (Cellular One), cellular telephone systems, and the necessity for the proposed application. The United States Congress, through the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has mandated that Domestic Public Cellular Radio Telecommunications Service will be provided through the issuance of two licenses in each of the 305 Metropolitan Statistical Areas and the 428 Rural Statistical Areas of the United States. One of these licenses is automatically granted to the local wire -line telephone company, the other to an independent. McCaw Cellular Communications, Inc., (Cellular One) headquartered near Seattle, Washington, is the largest cellular telephone company in the United States, holding the largest share of U.S. non -wire cellular licenses. Through its regional and local subsidiaries, McCaw provides cellular telephone service to many areas of the country, serving a total population of over 40 million people. McCaw's size and national presence create opportunities and competitive advantages not available to smaller cellular telephone companies and permit the development of new technologies, improved customer service programs and favorable service rates. Cellular telephone service is a form of telecommunications capable of high quality, high capacity service to and from vehicle- mounted and hand -held radio telephones. The cellular P. 2, letter from G. Wayne to J. Pace Proposed cell site installation 1 -30 -90 concept was developed in order to provide quality mobile telephone service to a large subscriber base with nationwide interconnect compatibility. A cellular system consists of several major elements. These are a Mobile Telephone Switching Office (MTSO), cell sites, cell site interconnect facilities (which connect the MTSO with the cell sites), and cellular telephones. The McCaw Cellular Communication system in the Puget Sound areas (as elsewhere) depends upon a network of strategically placed cell base sites. A switching office monitors the signal strengths of calls in progress. As a caller moves away from one cell base site and the signal strength of a call decreases, the computers automatically switch the call to the next cell base site which provides a stronger signal. A large, well- designed cellular system is capable of handling thousands of calls at the same time, and can provide transmission quality comparable to conventional landline telephone service. The confluence of multiple freeways such as exists in Tukwila (I -5, I -405, and the Valley freeway) is a key factor in locating effective cell sites and providing quality transmission and service. (See attached Engineering letter.) Cell base sites are oriented geographically in a hexagonal grid pattern. Each cell base site is located a certain distance from neighboring cell base sites so that it will provide service to a specific geographic area, based on multiple factors including traffic distribution, topographical features, radio interference concerns and quality. Accordingly, cell site locations are characteristically located in areas where the cell site is nearby to freeways or heavily travelled arterials, where the line -of -sight between roadway and cell site is minimally obstructed, and preferably away from hilltops and other prominent land features where radio towers are typically located to avoid intersystem interference. To provide system coverage in densely populated areas, the search area for a cell base site is quite small, often one -half mile or less in diameter, depending upon topographical factors, i.e. the presence of valleys, hills, bodies of water which either stop or extend radio coverage causing either a loss of service or "skipping" of radio propagation for long distances and thus destroying service by causing intersystem interference. In addition to the technical factors, McCaw must also locate property owners within these search areas which are willing to accept cell site facilities on their properties. See attached record of negotiator's report on all properties for Tukwila site. P. 3, letter from G. Wayne to J. Pace Proposed cell site installation 1 -30 -90 Like the City of Tukwila which we understand is experiencing growth pressures from new businesses desiring locate in Tukwila, McCaw Cellular Communications is experiencing increased public demand for cellular telephone service. There are approximately 50,000 cellular users in the Seattle area. This number is doubling every two and one -half years. In the Tukwila area, the net result of the increased demand is rapidly worsening bouts of interrupted service in the area of the confluence of I -5,I -405, and the Valley Freeway. To improve the existing network of cell sites to meet an expanding demand, McCaw has received approvals to construct an additional 30 cell sites in the following jurisdictions: Bellevue, King County, Pierce County, Seattle, Snohomish County and Tacoma. Additional approvals (33) are pending in Everett, Clallum County, Island County, Lynnwood, Redmond, Renton, San Juan County, Skagit County and several others. McCaw is also sensitive to aesthetic issues and has cooperated with a number of jurisdictions by altering the tower design and /or moving the sites where technical and physical limits allow. Cellular communications is an'extremely low -power use, employing only a fraction of the power used by television and radio broadcasters. Thus, cellular communication systems are not a source of interference with consumer electronic equipment such as radios and televisions. On rare occasions such interference can be caused by high -power broadcast sources like radio and television broadcasters. The FCC has specific regulations and exclusive authority to regulate and require elimination of interference from such sources. Multiple cell site locations are needed to provide the coverage required by our FCC license for the King County area. McCaw Cellular Communications is currently operating over 35 cell sites around Puget Sound with no cases of television or radio interference reported. Any microwave transmission is also strictly controlled by the FCC in a similiar manner so that interference is avoided. McCaw Cellular Communications has experienced no cases of interference relating to any of its currently operating microwave or cellular facilities. The primary users of cellular mobile telephone service are members of the business community and the public sector. The mobile telephone becomes a useful tool for the business community leading to increased productivity. The larger groups of cellular users include business owners and executives, professional managers; construction industry personnel; and sales professionals. Additionally, mobile telephone service is extensively used in the public sector and others providing emergency services such as doctors, police and fire department personnel. Public mobile telephone systems have become an essential portion of the public communications network. See P. 4, letter from G. Wayne to J. Pace Proposed cell site installation 1 -30 -90 TUKWILA SITE (Longacres) attached governmental agencies list. In particular they represent the most secure form of communication available for widespread usage to security and law enforcement officials. Cellular mobile telephone service allows police and others to conduct discreet (cellular frequencies cannot be easily monitored like normal police and federal law enforcement radio channels) communications in the field. Those having cellular mobile telephone service can and do contact 911 to report accidents, fires and medical emergencies. The recent natural disasters of Hurricane Hugo in Charleston, S.C., and the earthquake in the San Francisco Bay area attest to the reliability of cellular service. In both instances, the public phone system and public safety communication systems failed or were unable to provide the necessary support for rescue efforts. The cellular systems in both areas withstood the devastation and provided superb reliability and performance to service rescue workers and the public alike (See attached letter from the California Public Utility Commission.) These are just a few of the uses of cellular mobile telephone service. The proposed cell base site is located immediately north of South 158th Street and east of Nelsen Place. The property is zoned M -1, Light Industry, but requires a Conditional Use approval to install the cell base site because of the public utility use. The height of the proposed structure is 115 feet; 100 feet for the pole and 15 feet for the whip antennas. A 12 foot by 28 foot concrete shelter with washed aggregate walls will house the necessary electronic equipment. To provide security, the tower and shelter will be enclosed with a 6 foot high chain link fence topped with 3 strands of barbed wire, a steel door is provided on the concrete shelter, and properly posted warnings will be included. The building and tower are alarmed and monitored 24 hours a day by an operations center. The proposed cell base site can be fully constructed within approximately 4 to 6 weeks. The proposed facility is essential to the public need. The location of this cell base site will provide critical communication coverage to both the existing mobile telephone service subscribers (which includes the Tukwila Fire Department) and the Goodwill Games users. As identified earlier in the letter, bouts of interrupted service for mobile telephone service subscribers now exists in this portion of Tukwila. This site will also provide service for the Sea -Tac airport, where athletes, officials, and dignitaries of the Goodwill Games will be arriving and departing. One- hundred and forty -eight (148) parcels were identified in the search area and of the 148, 76 were further identified as being P. 5, letter from G. Wayne to J. Pace Proposed cell site installation 1 -30 -90 suitable. Each of the 76 were contacted and negotiations began. Once negotiations were concluded for this site, drive tests were conducted to ensure suitability of the site. McCaw Cellular Communications is very pleased to be expanding cellular telephone service in Tukwila. We have operated a cellular system in the area for over five years and look forward to providing quality coverage for both the businesses and public agencies in Tukwila as well as those in the general area. I hope this letter will serve to better explain our application and answer many of your questions and concerns. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at 283 -8319. Sincerely, Attachments: Letter from Phil Oxley /Cellular One with attachments Copy of negotiator's report for lease site California Public Utilities Commission Letter to Craig McCaw (dated November 1, 1989) List of Local Govermental Agency users cc: Al Mastroianni Mr. Jack Pace Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Mr. Pace: 1990 GOODWILL GAMES SEATTLE ; 1 1 q `? ) January 18, 1990 RE: McCaw Communications - Proposed Cell Site Near the South Intersection of 1 -5 and 1-405 The Goodwill Games Organizing Committee has selected McCaw Communications/ Cellular One to provide the mobile communication system for the 1990 Goodwill Games. With numerous events scheduled at different locations throughout the Puget Sound area, an effective mobile communication system in the Puget Sound area is critical to the Games success. One of the significant elements of this event, which depends on a mobile communication system, is the transportation and security of athletes, Games officials, dignitaries, and other to and from Sea -Tac Airport and throughout the Puget Sound area. Construction of facilities for the Games is now underway. Advance teams from around the world are now arriving in the area. It is critical that we have the mobile communication system in place as soon as possible. We have just learned that McCaw must install a cell facility (consisting of a small shelter and an antenna structure) in the area southeast of the 1 -5/1 -405 intersection, in the City of Tukwila, to fill an existing "hole" and eliminate "blocking" in its communication system. The area to be covered by this facility must be included as soon as possible to meet the mobile communication needs of the Games. Mr. Jack Pace January 18, 1990 (0) SEATTLE GOODWILL GAMES ORGANIZING COMMITTEE 999 FIRST AVENUE • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98151 -1990 • (206)554 -1990 FAX:(206)343 -1542 • Mr. Jack Pace January 18, 1990 Page Two KS:mr We urge you to take whatever action that you are able to expedite installation of McCaw's proposed cell facility. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, \7- . )ttik Kathy Scanlan Executive Vice President One e 0 UNION :4■ss•■ • :� ■ smile • ■s ■ ■■ • -olimmEMEL Pace Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA. 98188 Dear Mr. Pace, As the lead engineer at Cellular One, I would like to take this time to explain the methodology in cell site selection and the reason for our permit request in the City of Tukwila. There are a four parameters that must be considered in the design of a cellular telephone system and in the placement of the cell sites that, collectively, operate as a system for a defined geographical area; for this discussion, the greater Puget Sound area. 1) CAPACITY The Federal Communications Commission has granted cellular carriers a restricted amount of frequency spectrum. To use this allocation efficiently, a strict frequency plan must be followed. Throughout cellular systems, frequencies are assigned to cell sites in a pattern that allows for frequency reuse and smooth system growth. To maintain this equilibrium, we limit the number of channels at each cell. When traffic requires more channels at a cell than is designed, a new cell is con - structed. By April of 1990, this will be the situation in Tukwila. The attached map shows the proposed Southcenter cell and two existing cells. Each cell has a three sectored antenna con- figuration with a design limit of 19 channels per sector. The sectors that are highlighted in orange are those that will reach capacity in April. To allieviate the traffic conjestion the new cell should be placed equidistant from the existing cells and /or in proximity of the demand (ie. I -5, I -405 and the commercial area of Tukwila). The proposed site this criteria. 101 Elliott Ave., Suite 435 Seattle, WA 98109 206/283.8319 2) INTERFERENCE PROTECTION The frequencies used for cellular can best be described as "line of sight ". To minimize potential interference in the Puget Sound area, the irregular terrain should be used to en- hance system design and performance. Local hills should be used to limit the cell's radiation pattern from extending beyond it's designed service area. In the site selection process for the Southcenter cell, cri- teria was established that the site must use the Skyline hill to limit the cell's radiation pattern. This would prevent interfering signal levels from extending up Lake Washington and into Bellevue. The Tukwila hill to the immediate north prevents the radiation pattern from reaching the industrial valley in south Seattle. With these natural obstructions we are able to serve only the area for which it is designed, Tukwila, south Renton, I -5 and I- 405/518. 3) TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION As mentioned above, the Southcenter cell has a three sectored antenna pattern. To insure an even distribution of traffic, placement relative to the major highways is critical.The site has been placed between I -5, I -405 and highway 167 to be served by the SW, N and SE sectors respectively. To be lo- cated beyond any of these highways would result in at least one under utilized sector, and consequently, adjacent over utilized sector(s) requiring additional capacity site(s) in a shorter timeframe. 4) QUALITY OF SERVICE The Tukwila area currently has areas of relatively weak sig- nal strength and receives a high volume of customer com- plaints. The placement of the Southcenter cell should "fix" these areas while providing system capacity. It is important that the cell "sees" Interurban Ave., 518 east of I -5 and the interstate interchange. In the summer of 1989 we performed tests from the proposed site to confirm that the weaker areas would be improved. The attached plot can be laid on top of the map to see the relative signal strengths in the area. The black hexagons are existing sites and the red dots are other new sites not yet on the air.Green indicates the strongest signal levels with . orange and red being the weakest. Sincerely, Once the . design criteria has been established for each of the parameters described above, a site can be selected and a search area identified. The Southcenter site, because of it's unique requirements, has a finite search area.(attatched) The types of system changes we our experiencing in Tukwila are occurring throughout our system. Currently, Cellular One has 35 sites on the air in the Seattle area. By the end of 1990, another 30 will be constructed. While each of these sites are and should be reviewed independently from a land use perspective, I hope this letter explains their collective importance in the rapidly growing public mobile telephone network. Please contact me at your convenience at 283 -8319 should you have any questions or comments Philip Exley Manager of System Development • r‘ • ewport Hills .6 at Des Zenith Fatten Point \I (d1 „ , • a L Dabney Pt Groat Pr Calkins ,• Point C - : it CI Kent ton: • .; d IlIntliWttl It Gtee • Poin • v I • .• I I ! r 0 7 t> enr�w r Allentown' •/ \�•• r�., ) . Post, * ir I' J \: ist -- 17 - wo �..:�:�,. tau "W lam* tausite4 l ; riMffiffi _ tam .M441-fr I i 1 II 11•• II .BM ••, 23 • : Fi I • :Longacrel, ipi ` • tilM I .0111 Wrack .• O RO/VJCY S / 7 r : .;11 II '11 _; Reservoir • •-1i nk• :Ai Int I:art 11 16 A BM 10. .: . ••• SEA2CH i1Re ^� COMMISSIONER November 1, 1989 Public Utilities Tom STATE O F C A L I F O R N Craig McCaw Chairman McCaw Cellular Communications, Inc. P.O. Box 97060 Kirkland, WA 98083 -9760 Dear Craig: I.am writing on behalf of my colleagues to congratulate and commend McCaw Cellular Communications and Bay Area Cellular Telephone Company (BACTC) for your immediate and effective assistance throughout the affected area during the recent earthquake disaster. Two aspects of McCaw's response stand out for special commendation. First, you took all steps necessary to keep service up despite the loss of power in the region and the damage suffered by some of BACTC's facilities. As a result, vital mobile communications were handled at volumes that reached twice normal. Second, McCaw and BACTC immediately began distributing telephones to emergency personnel and arranging with manufacturers to supply, ultimately, over 2000 cellular phones in less than 48 hours. These telephones proved essential in coordinating emergency relief efforts throughout the region. I know that these efforts started at the top with your personal involvement along with other McCaw executives, staff and technicians. Within hours of the earthquake, private and chartered planes began arriving at Oakland Airport carrying cellular phones, emergency equipment and the people needed to make it work. This past Monday John McCaw reported personally to me about your efforts and McCaw's contining commitment to California. I must say that McCaw's emergency response was a convincing reaffirmation of that commitment. Mr. Craig McCaw Page 2 'November 1, 1989 Again, on behalf of the Commission please accept congratulations and thanks for a job well done. extend the Commission's heartfelt condolences to the BACTC employee whose life was tragically cut disaster. cc: John McCaw Commissioners Cordially, G. Mitchell Wilk President my Please also the family of short in this • McCAU CELL -1 ANALYSIS A.U.GUY 14, JULY 1989 Analysis of Potential Health Effects of Radio - Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation From The Proposed Communications Antennas at. Cellular -1 4th and Pike Building Site, Seattle, Washington SUMMARY by Arthur U. Guy, Ph.D. Professor and Associate Director Center for Bioengineering University of Washington This is a report of the estimated radio frequency (RF) power densities and potential health effects in the environment of the Cellular -1 4th and Pike building site after installation of 4 cellular communications system transmitting antennas at each site. The report was requested by Mr. Merle S. Cox of McCaw Cellular Communications, Inc. (MCCI). The purpose of this report is to 1) quantify in detail the radiation levels 5 feet above the roof and 5 feet above the top floor of the building below the penthouse where the proposed cellular communication system antennas will be mounted and 2) compare the radiation levels with existing maximum permissible human exposure standards and the thresholds for biological effects as reported in the peer reviewed scientific literature. The background and description of the site is described in reports, drawings and antenna brochures provided to the author by Mr. Cox and colleagues of MCCI. Finally a description of the antennas, antenna characteristics, antenna locations, and radiation patterns were contained in the documents provided to the author by MCCI. The detailed analysis has shown that the maximum possible power density at the roof of the site would be 10.9 UU /cm The analysis also has shown a maximum possible power density of 2.26 uW /cm above the floor of the top story of the from RF radiation through the concrete roofs. The calculations were made for a height of 5 feet above the surfaces of the roof and floor of the top storie of the building at the site to insure quantification of maximum levels where people are exposed. This position of highest calculated power density at the roof of the building was located McCAW CELL -1 ANALYSIS A.u.GUY 14, JULY 1989 2 approximately 10 feet southwest of the southwest side of the penthouse upon which the antennas were mounted. The position of maximum estimated power density above the floor of the top story of the 4th and Pike building site was approximately 30 feet southwest of the southwest side of the penthouse. All calculated levels of radiation at the site were found to be below the thresholds of harmful biological effects as reported in the peer reviewed literature and below thresholds of all of the maximum permitted human exposure standards of the United States as shown by the bar graph in Figure 1. A scatter plot of calculated radiation levels for the roof of the site is shown in Figure 2. In order to conveniently reference the positions where calculations were made a rectangular coordinate system oriented as shown in Figure 2. was used with the x axis parallel with the southwest side of the building and the y axis parallel with the southeast side of the building. All azimuths were specified with respect to the direction of the y axis. The dotted lines running parallel with the y axis denote positions where calculations were made. A calculation of power density was made at the position of the dots spaced at a distance of 5 feet apart. Values of calculated power density are printed at selected locations. Values of power density were not calculated for inside of the penthouse. Figure 3 provides similar information for 5 feet above the floor of the top story of the building site. Figure 4. illustrates the power density along the main beam of antenna number 3 when it is directed due southeast to simultate worst case conditions for determining maximum possible exposure levels of adjacent buildings. The rationale and theory used for making the calculations are discussed in detail in the report sent to you on May 24, 1989 intitled "Analysis of Potential Health Effects of Radio - Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation from the Proposed Communications Antennas at Cellular -1 West Seattle and Denny Terrace Sites, Seattle, Washington" dated May 22, 1969. (0 c o 9 _. V D �• o o CL o C C D c a 0 Ft CD O) CI CD C c CD 0o -1 CALCULATED POWER DENSITY (µW /cm 2 ) O 0 C) 0 C) 0 0 C) Q 0 0 C) C) 0 l ■ l 1 l It 1� 1 1 1 1 1 1111 l I l llli 1 l l . ! ■ III RESHOLD BIOEFFECT NIOSH RESHOLD BIOEFFECT > `= : EPA SURE STAND ANSI, FCC POS STANDA < NCRP, MASS AT ROOF MAXIMUM LEVEL 5' ABOVE FLOOR OF <----- TOP STORY .446 .610 .893 1.41 2.56 4.06 5.98 6.08 5.78 7.81 7.00 4TH AND PIKE BUILDING PENTHOUSE ANT #3 ANT N2 .458 .605 .831 1.19 1.65 2 .48 1 .33 .483 .663 .978 s 1.54 2.75 5 .57 9 .898 ANT #1 10.9 4.81 9.87 Imo; 7.29 8.79 6.65 3.22 5.38 6.27 7.44 5.8E T 7 .82 9.05 7.81 5.64 4.63 3.94 5.55 6.13 5.68 4.58 3.70 3.11 . . . . . . . . . . . 883 1.18 1.51 1.90 2.31 2.59 2.72 2.67 2.. 50 2.19 1.95 • 5 feet between tic marks 7.34 • .07 • 1.01 • 1.08 1.24 1.36 1.45 1.50 1.51 • 1.46 1.38 • 1.2E PIKE STREET Figure 2. Calculated power density (p.W /cm 2 ) at 5 feet above roof of 4th and Pike building due to three McCaw - Cellular -1 communications antennas • }- W J J .245 .323 .431 .573 .784 1.15 1.36 1.27 1.49 1.96 2.17 4TH AND PIKE BUILDING PENTHOUSE ANT 03 ANT 02 ANT 01 .922 1.98 2.11 2.26 Y .220 • .267 • .324 • .349 • .365 .449 • 1.17 • .60 • 1.49 • 1.97 • 2.21 234 .296 .387 .475 .597 1.07 1.63 1.09 1 1.31 1.84 2.08 x .82 1.99 1.91 1.81 1.74 1.64 .99 2.13 2.06 1.79 1.56 1.41 .462 .608 .767 .946 1.13 1.25 1.30 1.29 1.22 1.10 .99E 5 feet between tic marks .403 .481 .567 .654 .715 .761 .789 .794 .767 .726 .669 PIKE STREET Figure 3. Calculated power density (µW /cm 2 ) at 5 feet above floor of top story of 4th and Pike building due to three McCaw - Cellular -1 communications antennas. -90' - 80 a� a) w -70 0 Z - Q F- • 60 - - 50 - 100 - 40 . 110 4 6.77 - 30 - 20 8.15 10.0 • N E 12.6 16.2 Z 21.7 Q CC W 30.5 0 a- 45.5 74.1 134. 4TH AND PIKE BUILDING -10 PENTHOUSE .0 ANT #3 195. ANT #2 ANT #1 Figure 4. Calculated power density as a function of distance from antenna #2 along center of main beam. ..,.. 1 %..t.:14/ “..1 Ji n►uuyaia - H.W. uuy 13 �1u1 -t3y TABLE 1. CHARACTERISTICS OF CELLULAR-1 4TH AND PIKE SITE ANTENNAS USED IN POWER DENSITY CALCULATTCNS (DATE 13-JU, Azimuth and horizontal distances referenced to center of southwest panel antenna) Ant Length Service Antenna Type Freq. Azimuth Dist. Height Eff Rad Gain Azim Elev No. of Ant . Res Ref From R of Ant Power (dipo) of Beam of Beam (feet) (MHz) (deg) (feet) (feet) (kW) (db) (deg) (deg) 1 10.1 CEL Cl KATHREIN 740198 840.000 0.0 0.0 5.70 0.040 9.00 0.00 0.00 2 2.0 CEL Qi KATHREIN 40217 840.000 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.190 9.00 0.00 0.00 3 2.0 ca CM KATHREEN 40217 840.000 147.5 13.0 0.00 0.190 9.00 90.00 0.00 4 2.0 CEL CM KNTHREEN 40217 840.000 174.1 11.0 6.00 0.190 9.00 270.00 0.00 qcn & rixe Antenna Site Analysis - -03 3.60E -01 1.58E -01 6.05E �c ►,, vuu� -t ' ui o rlKe nliletUla Ji ce Analysis - 7.05E+40 1.81E -02 7.75E+00 ,.. , - 1 yu► N rixe Antenna site Analysis - %.i:r.w,ru, - 1 4111 t. rixe Antenna Site Analysis - 9.38E-01 4.12E-03 1.01E +00 • ,i. ut -1 4U1 n tie Antenna Site Analysis - 9.70E-01 3.15E -03 • 1.28E+00 ,�4.A, &, mui n rine runt_eruia bite Analysis - 1.60E -01 6.65E-02 2.67E -01 Lr.Lwuih -1 vcn & Pixe Antenna Site Analysis - Lr,,.WLArc -1 qcn ? rixe Antenna Site Analysis - 1.94E+00 3.48E -03 2.12E+00 ..._...w.ru� -� -Jut a rinc rull.Clllld w.ce Analysis - 4.51E-01 2.21E-03 4.81E -01 ■u.uJLgLL. - i 'iu, a r.ne N1LC1u1d J1le }Analysis - 5.16E-01 1.68E -03 • 6.69E -01 CELLULAR -I 4th & Pike Antenna Site Analysis - A.W. -01 4.73E -03 2.07E +00 2.71E +00 Lc.J- .L.uuln -1 yul s rii e Antenna Site Analysis - -01 3.18E -03 1.38E+00 1.80E +00 MATT.. #032 NEGOTIATOR'S REPORT STATE WASHINGTON COUNTY KING PROJECT =MAR TOWER SITE, OPTION /LEASES PAR. If SE 45 SOUIHCENTER CLIENT: Interstate Mobilephone Co., %Whalen & Company ADDRESS: 101 Elliott Aye, Suite 435, Seattle,WA 98119 NAME(S) of TITLE HOLDERS OF RECORD (Matial Status) RESIDENCE ADDRESS ROSS R. WHITNEY & DAVID S. WHITNEY, A/K /A. WHITNEY BROS., a WASHINGTON PARTNERSHIP P.O. Box 459, Lakebay, WA 98349 LEASED SITE LOCATION: Corner of Nelsen P1. So. & 158 St. Tukwilla, WA, Vacant Lot just south of 15700 Nelsen P1 So. (206) 884 -3529 (Residence - Unlisted) SEND PAYMENT CHECK TO: PH. II ( 206) 884 -9253 (Office In Residence) WHITNEY BROS, a Washington Partnership ADDRESS P.O. Box 459, Lakebay, WA 98349 NAMES OF LIEN /LEASE HOLDERS: NONE OF RECORD ADDRESS: NOTE ANY PERTINENT DATA NOT FOUND IN TITLE REPORT Ross R. Whitney is the senior partner of the partnership & handles all of the business transactions. Also he is holding a Per of Attorney from his brother David S., which is recorded in the King County, Wa records. He assured me that he will furnish a copy of the P /A, with submittal of the executed Option /Lease forms. TAX IDENTIFICATION NO. # (Ross R.) # (David S). Whitney Bros.Fed.# 91- 6071003 RECORD OF OWNER /AGENT MEETINGS: Date 10/13/89 Place RENO DAILY CONTACT DIARY FOR ALL Offer $500.00 DATES & MEETING & CONVERSATIONS (Phone) Present ALL MEETINGS & TRANSACTIONS VIA THE PHONE & EXPRESS MAIL Counter Offer $1,000.00 + Date Place Offer $800;00 + Present Counter Offer Accepted Date Place Offer Present Counter Offer Date Place Offer Present Counter Offer Date Place Offer Present Counter Offer SETTLEMENT DATA: Agreed Amount $ 500.00 (Option) TO BE PAID: One Payment $500.00 Option Money $ 800.00 + Per Month $ 9,600.00 Per Year # 5yr + 3 /5yr Renewals Years ADDITIONAL REMARKS: NOTE:PLEASE REFER TO THE OPTION /LEASE FR(M FOR THE PROMISES MADE, RELATIVE TO TAXES, PROPERTY GROOMING, CFIJ ULAR PHONE, REMOVING ALL OF FACILITY AT TERMINATION, INCREASE IN RENT EACH YR. OPTION MONEY NOT TO BE CONSIDERED FIRST MO. RENT. DATE OF POSSESSION OF PROPERTY: Immediately upon receipt of first months rent. REMARKS: (Be Specific On Main Points Of Discussion & Any Promises Made.) All Of the time, effort spent to acquire this lease is much to enormous to list as would it be time/ &space consummig list all of the people I contacted, in an attempt to secure a lease for this cell. Please refer to the Daily Contact Diary for more detail. The site leased however was obtained thru negotiations with Mr. Ross Whitney. The bottom line of this transaction was that Mr. Whitney really was not interested in leasing us the site, because they had plans to construct a building on the site & a lease to us would prevent such a move. Thus the asking price of $1,000.00 mo. + we pay all RYE tax on the parcel and a proposed sewer drainage project assessment that will be levied against the property. (OVER) After many phone conversations & a G 'sr. wait for Mr. Whitney to show to a per" meeting (he never showed), I . brought th , �ttP�' to a close by tl • to call him, to say that I was not i . !sted because of his exorbitant CONT. REMARKS: high asning p; ki that his phnnP was hi 7 way & in the intrim I received a mobile call from him. 'When he asked how the deal as he presented it to me was progressing with the authoriEies at Cellular One, I knew I had him where I wanted him,(Willing To Deal). I told him we were not interested because it was to much money:'-Hesaid , how such will you pay? I asked him, whats the least you will accept ?. He said $800.00 a month + R/E taxes. I said the most I will pay is $800.00 mo. & No Taxes. He said he would go on the $800.00 if I would pay 4 the R/E taxes. I said I might but I would not pay any assessments. After some discussion, he agreed to $800.00, 4 R/E taxes, 20yr. lease, Increase ea. yr. 10% max. One phone & no assessments. I cleared all of the concessions with Steve Lewis before I agreed with Mr. Whitney. In finalization, I had the instruments prepared in the office, having first have Steve L. approve the proper nomenclature relative to Mr. Whitney's demands. I then sent them Express Mail to his residence as he instructed. Due to the time element involved with my leaving, I instructed ;in the transmittal letter to return the properly. executed instruments to Steve L. at the Cellular One office. ( Copy of transmittal letter in file). SUFUTTr1) HEREWITH: 1) THE PROPERLY EXECUTED OPTION /LEASE FORMS WILL BE SENT TO STEVE LEWIS. 2) A copy of the prepared Option /Lease form, as sent to Mr. Whitney. 3) Four (4) photographs of the leased site. 4) Photos of all other potential sites. 5) All pre -title data, documenting ownership by Whitneys' of leased site. 6) Copies of transmittal letters to Mr. Whitney. 7) Renton 7.5 min. Quad, indicating coordinates of leased site; 47 27' 41 ", 122 14 29" 8) Copies of Daily Contact Diary (10 pgs) relative to the work performed on this site. 9) This comprehensive Negotiators report. 10) Directional map, to find the leased site. I, the undersigned Right of Way Agent, do hereby state the following; 1) (X) The written agreement secured as a part of this parcel, embodies all of the considerations agreed upon between the propert owner and myself. The agreement was reached without coercion, promises (other than those shown in the agreement & in this report) or threats of any kind whatsoever. I do not have a direct or indirect, present or contemplated personal interest in the property acquired, nor will I receive any benefit, in any form, from the property owner(s). I submit herewith, the completed parcel package, including all appurtenances thereto. DATE October 26, 1989 S OWNER: PHONE: TENANT: TENANT'S ADDRESS: PHONE: SITE IDENTIFICATION: . 6OUT8 CENTER PAGE | DAILY CONTACT DIARY DATE: AUGUST 1989 AGENT: THOMAS O. SINGLER RECEIVED: AUG. 21, 1989 8-21-89: Drove to South Center site to reconnoiter the area. Called and spoke mobile with three sales- men from Commercial D/C Brokers, who had signs in the Industrial Park t,_ in Tukwila. %Wo of them said owners were not receptive to towers and the third; Milt Reimers, of Cbldwell Banker (292-6000), said his client might be interested. I explained in complete detail the reason for my call. Be said that the least available space was 1600 sq.ft. Be said they wanted $960 mo. for rent and the 1st yr. up front. He said he'd check with his client and get back with me' Drove to South Center Shopping Mall and spoke with Kieth Mastus manager. He said there was room, and they had no problem with the hut, but had some doubt about the adverse effect of the tower on the esthetic value of the property. He said that 'money talks", so I should get him a lease form and he'd present it to the mall owners. From there I drove to the east side of Green River and reconnoitered along West Valig 8ighwqy commercial area. Spoke with several owners who were only leasing, and one who lived in Portland; another whose business was for sale, and a 3rd who leases from the owner of the gloss co. in the rear. I spoke with Nick Scinla, president of Hartung Glass Co., who said he did have room. He said he was in the process of getting permits because he was going to build there, but was going to talk to his architect and see if they could fit it in. He instructed that I call him back Thursday. Then stopped at Seattle Furniture Factory, 17508 W. Valley Highway. the manager there said the bldg. was owned by Alaska Copper & Brass Co' (623-5800)' l called and spoke with Brian Lucareli. Exolaioed ' --- in detail the reason for my call. He said I'd have to speak with Douglas Rosen on Thursday, but that it sounded good to him. -23-89: Early A.M.: Called Gary Merlioo Construction Co., 762-9125 relative to leasing a site Explained in complete detail to an administrative assistant, the reason for my call, and asked about the ---'--'------'---'-------- possibility of leasing a 50x50 spot at their batch plant on Valley Hgwy. She said interested, but that the power company easemant nakes then: already crowded and they have no space._ She suggested I try north a little further between Andy's Diner and Jack-io-che-Box, where there appears to be open space. (OVER) Cnx! . REMARKS: -24-89: Early A.M.: Made emcbilc call to Douglas Rosen, owner of Seattle Furniture Factory on W. Valley Rd. - I expranedin detail the reason for my call and told him we needed 50x50, or 2500 ag'tt. and offered him $500t, He' it sounded alright to him and said he'd like to see a copy of the option. I told him -------'---------'---'----------------'------ cont. fzan pg. I: I'd fax [ax ic to him: 382-7335. I called Steve and told him to do it right amay, since he had the option dae, and that it was to be for \�. at $500. Steve ������ b right away. -28-8'3: :aI]ed and spoke with Doug Rosen relative to the option/lease. He questioned increase every 5 yrs. and said that his uroperty leases increased every year 'u. he wanted the same. I told him I could have that approved for yearly increase ,�. 3A min. and 5|6 max. deUoen questioned a 50 yr. lease oy, said it was too long. ?lained the yCCrulp for long term !� to ;rotnoit�/phonn users, and he !rstood' He said he'd like to dincu:r it further with 11:1 attorney, and I ��. ;Id call him tomorrow, , and hoped we voul� put it togoLher. I also made several - _- .`' 'mpta to call Nick Sciola, at Hartung /2noo Co. but he always unavailable. ..he late \`.M,, I received a mobile ::-:|\ from Jeff Crane c'' CoIdwell Banker. Be : that he'd been in contact with Xi|t ]eixero , a co-cg whom I had been talking I about leasing a site in Crp, Industri;t1 Park Area at :;ow,h Center. He said he k worked with the other acquisition Lt-am that hits involved in one that w ' ted $960 per mo. for 404 sq. Ct. . H./ wanted to know what ,la going on. I told him - --- � was too much money and that l ho.! found 2 other uuiia>'.^ sites for $500. Be ----- . ',ed to know where, but I wouldn't tell him. I did tell .;frl I'd check with our ; :oe and see what was going on with his client, and let him know if they were .rpnted. He said our office has a copy of the lease that is already prepared S.960. I ask him if that amount is firm, and he said he :i;dn't think so; that if we made another offer, they would take less money, 1 not 8500. He , : the high price was because of the placing of the tower -a.nd its effect on the told him, that in my opinion, the tower would an asset to mtrioI Pork, because all industry v`mta to know that ::ular is available ro - heir executives and customers. He agreed with this. I :;old him I'd discuss ! with the proper authorities and get hack with him. 8-29-89: P.M.: Jeff Crane, of Ooldwcll Banker, returned my earlier call. I told him I had 2 potential sites Lined up at $500 ea. He kept pushing to know where they were. I told him only that... Page 4 Ctr... REMARKS: during_mx time in Ohio (from 9/1/-9/15/89), I assurgd131M-Xhat—I-would. & keep him informed of the progress. He said that he had received word from the people in marketing that they wanted this cite ASAP. I reminded him that Mi. Nelsen wanted to meet with her atty. & agent, before giving me a definite answer. She said_that she would be ready to meet with me upon my return to work on 11/16/8 9. I WILL KEEP IN TOUCH WITH HER IN THE INTERIM. 9-16-89: As preplanned, I met with Mks. Helen Nelsen at her home,_relative_to Snuth_cent We discussed__ in detail,. Ole_pOsibilitY_Df_leasing.the site. She .said_that.as.of_yet,_the-peopLe-af-the-Embassy--•._ . Suite HOte.L.ha.d_not_maddecission_as_to_how.much_Lsrul_the_ne.eded and_they-are-in the-process-of - - caring the AnctionJarn_ploperty. She_said_that ,she_wonld hP.meeting wittaker-441Warney-on Toms., and her agent on Wed., and that I should call her or visit her on Thurs., and shgld tell meinr Rime: yen nr no She said that if we do lease, it would have to be south, a bit further than we had originally discoggd,_ She also reminded me again that option money was to be option money and not the first month's rent. I then attempted to find another site, and found an empty_lotatNE corner of Blvd,_&_West_Valley. Highway, and will call Valerie Pratt of the title company to came up with an owner. Other souogs cteeked this date: 1) gas Station on W. Valley Hgw. across from Mrs. Nelsen: Lease 1-800-732-1073 or Sale 624-59910 2) Furniture Factory, 15660 Nelsen P1. S. 225-5566: John Chen. 3)RDR Corp. 15700 Nelsen P1. S. (Rawson), . 228-9988, Terry or Duncan. 4) Vacant Land on Nelsen, behind 15616 W. Valley Hi'w. (old nursery) 5) Hampton Inn, EBCO Inc. (208) 343-3439. 9-19-89: P.M.: Drove to South Center to attempt finding alternate site, as I'm not sure Mrs. Nelsen. will sign. I talked to several_property owners on Nelsen Place S. all to no avail. Drove back into Racetrack and saw a possible site location in their large west parking lot on the west side of the railroad track. 9-20-89: A.M.: Drove to South Center and met with Mrs. Helen Nelsen. She said she would lease to us only if we agreed to move the facility any time she might want to develope that property. I told her that was not feasible because of FCC regulations and the costs involved, so she didn't want to lease. I then drove to the racetrack and met with Mr. Mike O'Donin, Genreal Manager. I explained in complete detail, what I wanted to do. He was very receptive. We drove to the back of the parking lot, along side of the railroad tracks, where we'd want to be, and he said there'd be no problemwith that. I told him we'd offer $400, but he said that it wasn't enough. I told him we could go to $500 and he thought that would do it. I left a copy of the lease and he said he would discuss it with the proper authorities and I should net with him again on Friday. I set the coordinates, and called them in to Tammy at the office. She called later and said7they were O.K. 9-22-89: Early AAA. I called Valerie Pratt of TransAmerican Title" and requested the necessary information on the racetrack property. At 10:00 as Ereplanned, I met with Mr. O'Donin at the racetrack. He said the meeting with th uthorities had been postponed until today, and that I should call him tomorrow. He said the main concerns would be if our transmissions would interfer with their reception of satellite pictures. I assured him that it would not interfer, and that we would be willing to include that in the lease option as assurance. He said there may be some development in that area in the future, but he did not think it would bother us there. He requested a phone and I assured him that if we could put things together, I would see that he had a phone but that he would have to sign for 1 yr. and pay . _ installations. CONT. ON PAGE 5 t•.mt. tram Pg. 2... Page 3. they were 50x50. I did, however, tell him that Cellular One had sane moral obligation to his client, and if they could at least meet that money, or cone to $700, that ntayy we could sit down and talk to his client. Lacer he called back and said they wouldn't take less than $960. "At least •hetried." I called Steve to brin him up to date, and he said Crane had cried to call him. LAte P.M.: Received a call from Doug Rosen, who ;aid he is having difficulty with accepting the 30 yr. lease, and that he needed to talk with his atty. yet, and didn't want to be rushed. I told him 1 was going out of town for two weeks and that I'd check back with him when I got back, if I hadn't found something else in the meantime. A bit laces Je €.f_CranQSa]„ied back again and wanted to know if there was sonethiniLthat could be done to save the deal. He kept referring to twuyne Car roway, wham he said _was an acqui.sitiott ratan for McCaw. 1 said 1 had never heard of him and that airy .lealings that were going_to be done had to be done with me, not this Carrowal or Steve Lewis. He suggested that I call his client and see why they wanted $960. I told him I didn't care why they wanted that amount; that we are not interested. Then he told the of this Carroway's back up site plan with him; 900 sq.ft. on top a 60' bldg. for $1000 mo. I ask him why we'd pay $1000 when we won't pay $960. He then said he'd do more chi•, king around and call me back tomorrow. 8- 30-89: i.M.: Drove to South Center, with a col of a Thkwilla City plat map, shrw ing area where towers are Ieinutted, and reconnoitered our cell site area within the city's area. Stopped and looked at a piece of pn• ;•arty north of Jack -in- the -Box Restaurant on West Valley Rd. Spoke with a man on the property who said tli.i: all this land belongs to Helen B. Nelsen, who lives across the highway up at the intersection, so I drove up acre to speak with her. She is quite elderly but sharp as a tack, and says she doesn't sell any of her I,uu: - just leases it; that way she can keep a finger on it. I explained what I wanted and where we'd I ik. to be. She said she had a parcelof land south of Auction Bldg. Parking lot, between power line easeti►_nt and ;he railroad, that would work. I. told her we needed 50x50 and would pay her $500 no. When we looked over tt, insurance, she said she wanted $I million and a 5% increase in rent each yr. I told her we pay with tti. CP1 with 3% min - 57. max. After sate: discussion, she agreed with that. We discussed tbt30 yr. lease, and I , :.plained the FCC ruling and she agreed with (Thai. 1 gave her a Review Cup„ with points included as we had disused and I told her I'd he back on Sept. 16. She said that would be fine; she would talk to her atty. and ;Hake notes on points to be changed. 1 cautioned her that i cannot change the lenth of the lease. She asked dp,,:.1 how nuch the option was, and when 1 told her $500, she said that was to be option and NOT the 1st no. I gave her Steve Lewis' name and cumber to call if she had any questions while I was gone. I then took a ptore of the proposed site, set the coordinates and called them into Steve. He called back and said they we r, good and we had a good site. He also said that if Jeff Crane were to call him, he would tell Jeff that Dwo.ate Carroway was off the project and I was working on it. late P.M. Received a mobile call fran Jeff Crane again relative to whether or not we were interested in either of the sites he had: one at $960 no. or the other at $1000 no. 1 cold him we were not interested. He asked about Dwayne Carroway and I repeated to him that I was in complete charge of acquiring the site and I was not interested in either site. 8/30/89 Early A.M. I talked to Steve incident to the progress on this site. In summation to our conversation, he instructed Chat I keep in contact with Mrs. Nelsen, via phone r. REMARKS They accepted_thaLiie also agreed to scarify the land if we should leave for any reason. He told me to WI • - , I Page 6 t 50x50 o I did and took some ictures. W. O'Donin came back to see where we would be and 'gave him a picture. He said the V.P. had already contacted the attorney and they would know something tomorrow or Monday. told him I'd call on Monday and he said he'd call me if he heard anything, sooner. 10-2-89: As instructed I called Mike O'Donin. He said that the Vice President and President will be coming irLQ. _ Wednesday, and he wanted them to see where I had staked off, and that I an to call them on Thursday. 10-5-89: P.M.: Spent the afternoon reconnoitering area for an alternate site, if the racetrack doesn't go. Spoke again with Mike O'Donin, at the track, but he said he hadn't heard anything yet; that they are waiting for answer from the lawyer. I also spoke with real estate agent, Ph: 624-5900, relative to a FOR LEASE sign on an abandoned gas station on West Valley Highway, but he said they were not interested in leasing anything but the whole property. 10-13-89: Early A.M.: Called Jim Anderson and Mike O'Donin at the racetrack. They said they wanted a clause in the lease, relative to interference with their transmission being corrected. I said there was no problem with that and that we were willing to go to a 20 yr. lease. Mike said that was fine and that at 1:00, I should stop and pick up the clauses typed as they wanted them, for insertion into the lease. At 1:00, as preplanned, I met with Mr. O'Donin at the track. He said they had had their meeting at 11:30 and now he says the opposite of what he told me on the phone this morning. He said the President and the Vice-Presidents decided they didn't want to tie up the property in the back, because they are entertaining ideas of selling it and didn't want to jeopardize any sale. I called Steve to inform him of this newest developement, and then called Jeff Crane of Coldwell Banker, relative to the possible site at the Industrial Park. He was not in, so I left word for him to call me. I then took a look at the area west of the railroad track and north of Racetrack Drive; called Nelson Place So., a small industrial complex. Stopped at libeller Brass, where the secreatary told me the property was owned by Ross Whitney, of Whitney Bros. in Lake Bay, WA. Ph: 884-9253. I then went to the business directly to the south and was told that Whitney owns the whole strip of buildings, including a 200x300 sq.ft. vacant lot at the south end that would be ideal for our needs. I was unable to contact Mr. Whitney but will continue to try. Later that afternoon, I called again and his secretary said that he was away on business until late Monday, but she would give him my message when he called in tomorrow, and I should try again on Tuesday. LATE P.M.: Received a call from Jeff Crane. He said that he saw no change in his client's position relative to that spot I had enquired about. He said they would want $950 - $1000, if they even would lease...he will check and get back with me Monday. enough because of inflation. He said he negotiates with his tenants every 5 yr. and it works out. I called Steve on the matter and he agreed on 20 yr. lease and would go along with a 10% Cap on theCPI. Later in the day, I was able to contact Mr. Whitney again. I told him that my authorities agreed to his demands. We went over the form roughly on the phone. He wanted the option money to be just option Continued on Page 7. 10-17-89: Called and spoke with Mr. Ross Whitney, owner of the property in South Center search ring. He said he was interested, but a 30 yr. lease was too long and a 5% max on the CPI on rent increase was not OWNER: PHONE: TENANT: TENANT' S ADDRESS: PHONE: SITE I )L N'I'll•'ICATION: DAILY CONTACT DIARY RO TH CENTER PAGE 5 DATE: AGENT: Cont. from Page 4. He said he would be in the office by 9:00 on Sat. and I should call him. 9- 23 -89: As preplanned, I met with Mike O'Donin at the racetrack. He said that the powers had had their meeting and he foresees no problem. They had discussed how they'd handl a key fnr our arrPCg and secondly that their TV technicians wanted to double check that our frequenries wrn,l1 not intprfer with their transmissions. I again assured him that we'd put into the agreement that there would be no interference. He instructed that I meet with him or call on Monday about 10:30. 9- 24 -89: Called TransAmerica and ordered deeds and easements for racetrack properties. Later went to the Bellevue office and picked then up. Irene had difficult}kince there were so many. I then called mobile to Mike O'lbnin at the track to check with him per his instructions. He said that they_'Ln e&$25 per month because they will have to have a security guard on call during night hours if we should need access. He said that their legal department is now giving the lease their perusal and he should have a direct answer by Thursday. He also clarified for me the ownership sold out to them :(Broadacres) -A. ,- I -41 9- 26-89: Steve Lewis called me early to tell me that Jeff Crane of Coldwell Banker called him relative to the So. Center site. He told me to call him and keep him on the string, as lonp possible.__I then Crane to ask him to look into the triangluar property on the end of Bldg. 8 in the industr*gt center. I offered $500 for 2900+ sq.ft. and told him to get back to me when he had something. I then called Mike 0'D nin at the racetrack to inform him that we'd go with the increase in money and getting him his phone, but that the FCC said we must have access without worry about finding secruity guards at odd times. He said there would be no trouble, as they'd cut another lock into the gate chain. I related this information to Steve and he said that was fine. I then called Bob Meyers, engineer at the race- track to give him the name of Cellular One's technician if he needed it, but he thanked me and said he didn't need it. 9 9 : 0 0 , as pp at the racetrack with Mike O'Donen_and.Jack.Anderson, . V.P..and Financial Director. Their main concern was possible interferance on their T.V. transmission. I assured them once again that we would put into tingthat, there'd _noJ.nterferance they reconfirmed that they wanted $62S mo. and wanted 15% . increase per.. y_ r._,_ I__said...tbat_.the.nnney...was no problem, at we could give the a minimum of 3% and Maxinun of 5% ea. yr. (OVER) CoN , . REMARKS: THUR. 10- 19-89: P.M. Drove to Tukwilla to visit with Mrs. Nelsen. Before I went in, I called Steve to see what the least space we'd need if we used a monopole. I explained to Mrs. Nelsen what I'd like to do there, and what changes I could make in regards to the size of the area needed. I explained that we would need 25x40 and would give her $500 mo.with a yearly increase with an 8% CAP. She said that certainly looked better than a 3 -5 % She repeatedly emphasized the fact that she was reluctant to lease any space in the original area until after Embassy Suites Hotel determines how much parking space they will need. She will not do anything to jeopardize their plan. I told her our facility would cause no problem to their parking plans. I reiterated my statement that I was sure Embassy Suites would be more than willing to have us close to their property so they could advertize to their guests that cellular service is available. She said that makes a lot of sense. She showed me where the property was and said that we could get into it, but that she couldn't do anything until her agent, an 80 yr. old man who has worked for years for her, returns to town on Oct. 29. So we'll have to wait until then. This woman is a very dear sweet lady; very alert, easy to talk to and most capable of conducting any and all business transactions. I think if someone takes their time and works with her, she would give us a lease. I then drove to Andy's Diner and spoke with the General Manager, who said we'd have to speak with the owner; Andy Yourcanon, PH: 624 -4097. I made several attempts to reach him to no avail. With the way the diner sits and the power line easement behind, there would be no roam anyway. From there, I moved to 16th Street, north of the racetrack, south of Highway 405, and found a dilapitated piece of property, with a dog chained in the yard. No one was at home, but I was told by a neighbor that it was owned by the racetrack, so I called Mike O'Donin at the track. He said that particular property was not `' theirs. I called Eilene at TransAmerican Title Co. and gave her the location and asked her to see if she co U041 find out who the owner was. She said it would be ready tomorrow. Page 8. FRI. 10- 20-89: Went to TransAm. and spoke with Eilene. She said they still haven't found the title for the WHitney property, but will continue looking. She did, however, give me a property profile for the property at 1212 16th St. in Renton. It is owned by Longacres Joint Venture, 921 Middle Fork Rd., Onalaska, WA. Still thinking this was the racetrack, I tried to call Mike O'Donin again to see if we could lease there, but he was busy, so I'll have to call him back. Eilene also gave me a copy of the tax assessor's plat map on Mrs. Nelsen's property, but said she couldn't find the deed yet, because it was so old, and will continue to look upstairs in the files. I then received a call from Ross Whitney. He said he had discussed the lease option he had received in the mail, with his brother and their lawyer. They decided that by signing the lease, they would thereby loose any rent they would have realized from a building they were planning to build there. They therefore wanted $1000 a mo. rent. He said there were a few other things they wanted adjusted in the lease, but that we could take care of them after the financial question was settled. I told him I could not make that decision, but that I would take it up with the proper authorities. I said I didn't think they would go for it, but all I could do was present it to them. I then called Steve and explained the situation to him. He said we should pay $500 for an option with hopes we'll sign Mrs. Nelsen later. Mr. Whitney then called me back to tell me that the $1000 was net. I asked him what he meant, and he said that we would have to pay the real estate tax Cont. on Pg. 9 OWNER: PHONE: TENANT: TENANT'S ADDRESS: PHONE: DATE: October 1989 CONTINUED FROM PAGE 6.. SITE IDL•:NTIFICATIOi.: SOUTH CENTER DAILY CONTACT DIARY AGENT: could meet him there. We made arrangements to meet at 11:00 tomorrow. THOMAS 0. SINGER money and not the 1st mo. rent, and he also asked for a telephone. I said I thought I could arrange that, but he would have to pay for installation and the service for at least one yr. To this he agreed, and asked that I send him a copy of the lease option. I told him that I would like to sit down with him and go over it in detail and would be available tomorrow if he could fit it in his schedule. He said he could because he had to go to Gig Harbor and I Wed. 10- 18 -89: At the appointed time, I drove to Gig Harbor for my 11:00 meeting with Mr. Whitney. I waited at the shopping center for 4 hours, but he did not show up. I made several calls during that time, to his secretary to inquire of his where abouts. She said he told her he had an appointment with me, but that he was going to the doctors first. She didn't understand that happened. At 3:00 I called again and told her I was leaving and if she heard from him, she should call me. At 4:00 she called and said he had been detained at the doctor's and was then sent to the hospital for tests. He said he would call me this evening. At 8:00 P.M., Mr. Whitney called and apologized for missing our meeting and asked that I mail him a review copy of the prepared instrument for his perusal, and he will take care of it immediately. Page 7 Thur. 10- 19-89: Early A.M.: Sent, via U.S. MAIL EXPRESS, a review copy of the lease option to M. Whitney, at his home. Then went to TransAmerican Title Co. in Bellevue to get title information on Whitney's property for the So. Center site. They were able to give me tax information and an assessor's plat map, but could not find the deed. I called Mrs. Whitney and she gave me the approximate date of transfer from the father's name to Ross and his brother, and told me to call Mr. W. I did, and he gave me the name of his lawyer and told me to call him: Mr. Liebman of Franco, Asia, Ben Sussen & Coe. Ph: 624 -5622. When I spoke with Mr. Liebman to get the number from the reference deed, he was very curt and told me it was too early in the negotiations to need a deed description. I told him I wanted to be able to assure my people that we had the true owner of the property. He said we had a long way to go; that they were going to build a 5000 sq.ft. building there and we'd have to compensate for the loss of rental income from that before we could finalize any deal...and he hung up. (OVER) c;oN: REMARKS: continued from Pg. 9 - on reverse aED. 10725 -89: Early A.M.: Received a call from Ross Whitney, asking what the status is relative to lease option _negotiations. I said we were not going to lease from him because $1000 plus R./E tax and water assessment is too much money and we will not pay it. I told him we had another site at $400. He hemmed a bit and asked what the net we would pay would be. I asked him what the least he would take would be. When he said x_800 I told him that was the most we'd pay; if we did it! I told him I'd go back to the authorities and see what I could do. I told him we wouldn't pay the tax, but he suggested that we split them. I told him we would ,only split that portion where we'd have the site, and that we would not pay the water assessment which he agreed, but added that the other negotiated items remain the sane, including, the telephone. I told him that I'd get back with him. I then called Steve mobile and explained it to him. He told me to sign him up. I went into the office, where we went over the wording for the insertions and Rosemary typed it all up. s I drew up Exhibit "B ". In reading the description, it became very difficult to decipher, so I called Mr. Whitney. He cleared up the names on the deed and the position his brother holds. He said that he had . power of attorney for his brother and would sign for him. They did business as Whitney Brothers, so the lease was made out that way am a.k.a.'Ross and David Whitney. He also read the deed over the phone to Rosemary, who typed it in. I called Eilene at the title company and had her FAX the missing part_of the__ deed to our office. When all was prepared, I wrote a transmittal letter and sent the package to Mr. W. _via EXPRESS MAIL. I also called Mrs. Whitney and asked her to tell her husband that it was on the way. I also left instructions with Mr. Whitney, by phone and in the lease package written instructions to return the signed two (2) originals via Express Service to Steve Lewis at Cellular One, 101 Elliott Ave. OWNER: PHONE: TENANT: TENANT'S ADDRESS: PHONE: DATE: OCTOBER CONT. FROM PAGE 8 SITE E IDL :N'1'I1'ICn'1'IO .. nucalla DAILY CONTACT DIARY AGENT: THOMAS 0. SINGLER PAGE 9 because all his tenants do. I told him that I do not think our people will do it. He said I should talk to my people and get back to him. I asked him if $1000 was the least he would take and he said yes. SAT. 10- 21 -89: Late A.M.: Again reconnoitered the area of South Center. Returned to 1212 16th St. in Renton, north of the racetrack. The occupant said that he paid his rent to the Pasco Realty Co. in Renton. I drove there and spoke with John Tharp, 423 So. Third St. Renton, Ph: 255 -1541. I explained in detail the reason for my visit and told him we'd pay $400 for 35-x45 sq. ft. He said he'd get in touch with the owner and tell him of the offer. I told him we'd like to be in the back corner, near Interstate 405 and he said that would be good because it would not tie up the rest of the property . He said I should call him on Tuesday. (Coordinates: 47 -27 -59 122- 13 -56) MON: 10- 23 -89: Early A.M. Called Eilene at the title co. relative to the Whitney and Nelsen properties for the So. Center site. She said they were ready and I could pick them up. At 8:30 PM I made phone contact with Mr. Whitney about the property on Nelson Place. Upon questioning, he said that we do have access to the entire lot south of the parking lot for the Ross Drug Bldg. He said the taxes would be approx. $580 and yr. and there would be an assessment for a new drainage system by the Tukwilla City Public Works Dept, but he doesn't know how much it will be because it hasn't been levied yet. He also said that if we put up any building, other than the hut site, the rent will go up, and at the end of the 20 yr. lease, we'd have to tear it down or leave it for their use. He then asked what the next move would be, and I told him I'd present the situation to the proper authorities and they'd make the decision as to whether or not they would option for a year at $500. I told him I'd get back with him. TUE: 10= 24 -89: P.M. Received a call from Mr. JChn Tharp of Pasco Realty to let me know that e had contacted the owner of the land at 1212 16th St. in Renton, and that they were interested in leasing. He said they wanted to see something in writing, so I told him I would prepare a lease option for review and deliver it to his office tomorrow. I called Steve to tell him of the possible option and he said they had not as yet gotten to check the coordinates, but that I should continue persuing this possibility without the coordinates. Continued on Pg. 10 - over... 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800. 900 1000 SIGNAL STRENGTH (MICRQWATTS PER SQUARE CENTIMETER) American National Standards institute Safety Standard New Home Microwave TOWERS SELF - SUPPORTING LATTICE A free standing structure, supported by its own internal steel members without any wire or cable supports. MONOPOLE A self supporting single tubular hollow steel pole. GUYED A three faced triangular tower which would require as much as 5 acres of land to allow for the angle of support of the three stands of Guy wires. - x , Vi -.. �. i tr 180 FOOT THREE LEGGED TOWER WITH CONCRETE SHELTER AT BASE ikla Yv 11, '7,4et W r , 150 FOOT MONOPOLE TOWER WITH AMPS PLATFORM AT TOP < STROBE LIGHTING FAA PAINT < 360 FOOT THREE LEGGED TOWER 3'4 USUALLY A 12-FOOT BY 28 FOOT CONCRETE SHELTER WITH A WASHED ROCK FINISH. Tills FACILITY IS SURROUNDED BY A 10- FOOT ANTI-CLIMB Ci !AIN LINK FENCE. Tilt 11■••••■■••• • •••••••••••■■•• g AT&T &M`trOO pELIEK ALTERNATE HAICIPLATE LOCATION AC DISTRIBUTION PAIEL OEKTORATOR TAUGHT T FILTER ASSEMBLY (WALL HTOI RECEIVE FILTER ASSENT/ (WALL MO) I ALTERNATE I TOYER 1 % LOCATION N T I I , r i W 10" iT' 10' TO 25' , l / PREFERRED% ( TOWER 1 % LOCATION N 31.5' FRONT 2� • CONTROL CA/INET RADIO CABINET PAIR 0 f RADIO CABINET PAIR I RADIO CABINET PAIR 2 REAR HATCIPLATE FOR TOYER RECTIFIERS '3.5 2s' POWER CONTROL 26' T!PICAL Al CHANNEL CELL SITE NOTE: THIS FLOOR PLAY IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE copyright© 1987 AT &T All Rights Reserved SATTERI SIRING io 12' ISS 1, AT &T 401 -610 -005 4 IIP 24" ft FRONT — 1 - 25' FRONT j – I TrOATA SETS l '•• N --P" 72' —a Fib. 11- 3— Typical 48- Channel Mod 2 Cell Site Floor Plan ev • IRANS111SSIOI IOU I PIENI AIR CONDITIONERS (VALL RIO) CABLE ENTRANCE FACILITIES ATEN laM`lMU'LEK ISS 1, AT &T 401 -610 -005 TABLE 15 - CELL SITE EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENT AC Input Voltage AC Input Frequency Maximum DC Current (fully loaded cabinets) Rectifiers Required: - 3 to 6 Radio Cabinets (up to 96 channels) - 2 Radio Cabinets (up to 32 channels) - 1 Radio Cabinet (up to 16 or 8 channels) Heat Release - Maximum: - Control Cabinet - 16- Channel Combiner Cabinet - 16- Channel Transceiver Cabinet - 8- Channel Radio Cabinet - DTI Cabinet - Power Plant Dimensions - Model 2: - Control Cabinet - 8- Channel Radio Cabinet - 16- Channel Radio Cabinet Pair - DTI Cabinet - Power Plant • Control Cabinet • Rectifier (200A) • Batteries (12 round cells mounted in 2 tiers) SPECIFICATION 208/120 V ac 3 -phase or single -phase 60 + 3 Hz Control cabinet - 44 amps: 8- channel radio cabinet - 65 amps 16- channel radio cabinet - 130 amps Five 200 -amp, 3 -phase rectifiers or ten 100 -amp, 1 -phase rectifiers Three 200 -amp, 3 -phase rectifiers or four 100 -amp, 1 -phase rectifiers Two 200 -amp, 3 -phase rectifiers or four 100 -amp, 1 -phase rectifiers 960 watts 2160 watts 960 watts 1560 watts 175 watts 10% of total of other cabinets 31.5" Wx26" D x 72" H 31.5" Wx26" Dx72" H 63" W x 26" D x 72" H 31.5" Wx26" Dx72" H 28" W x 12" Dx72" H 13" W x 12" Dx72" H 90" W x 15" Dx76" H Copyright© 1987 AT &T AU Rights Reserved 15 -8 TABLE 15 -D (Contd) CELL SITE EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENT SPECIFICATION Dimensions - Model 1: - Control Frame 52" W x 18" D x 84" H - Radio Frame 52" W x 18" D x 84" H - Power Plant • Control Cabinet 28" W x 12" D x 84" H • Rectifier (200A) 13" W x 17" D x 84" H • Batteries (12 round cells mounted in 2 tiers) 90" W x 15" D x 76" H Floor Weights - Model 2: - Control Cabinet 590 lbs (100 PSF) - 16- Channel Combiner Cabinet 550 lbs (95 PSF) - 16- Channel Transceiver Cabinet 550 lbs (95 PSF) - 8- Channel Radio Cabinet 530 lbs (90 PSF) - DTI Cabinet 440 lbs (75 PSF) - Rectifier 550 lbs (360 PSF) - Power Control Cabinet 150 lbs (65 PSF) - Batteries (per string of 12 round cells) 4350 lbs (465 PSF) - Dehydrator 140 lbs (100 PSF) Floor Weights - Model 1: - Control Frame 850 lbs (130 PSF) - Radio Frame 1300 lbs (200 PSF) - Rectifier 550 lbs (95 PSF) - Power Control Cabinet 150 lbs (65 PSF) - Batteries (per string of 12 round cells) 4350 lbs (465 PSF) - Dehydrator 140 lbs (100 PSF) - AT&T ta Mr 0 GML ISS 1, MM &T 40 1 -6 10 -005 Copyright© 1987 AT&T All Rights Reserved 15 -9 BA1TERIES COULD SUSTAIN POWER TO THE CELL SITE FOR UP TO EIGHT (8) HOURS. RURAL SITES USUALLY HAVE A GENERATOR AS BACK-UP POWER. Mechanical Data Materials: Radome Radiators Support pipe Mounting clamps Fiberglass, MTDTM Brass Aluminum alloy Galvanized steel DB310 Lateral thrust at 100 mph (161 km/hr) — lbs. (kg) 80 (1.48) Tip deflection at 100 mph (161 km/hr) 3.1° Length: Overall — ft. (m) Radome — ft. (m) Support pipe — in. (mm) 16.33 (4.98) 14 (4.27) 27 (685.8) Net weight — lbs. (kg) Shipping weight — lbs. (kg) 43 (19.5) 72 (32.66) Hardware shipped separate — lbs. (kg) 12 (5.44) Electrical Data Frequency Ranges — MHz A = 806 -861, B = D = 824-880, E = 835 -894, F = VSWR (over 55 MHz) 849 -894, C = 816-866, 896-952, G = 928 -932 1.5 to 1 or better Bandwidth/Gain (minimum) — dB Across 35 MHz Across 55 MHz 10 9.5 ± 1.0 Beamwidth "E" Plane (half power) Beamwidth "H" Plane (halt power) 45° Omni Maximum power Input — watts Lightning protection 550 Direct ground Termination HELIAX jumper, 3 ft. included Type N- Female (fixed) N- Male/N -Male 6 OMNIDIRECTIONAL ANTENNA 10 dBd GAIN, 806-952 MHz Note: For 926832 MH: use -0 Sueix for 1000 wilts. Special order only. The DB860 is an omnidirectional 10 dBd gain antenna for 800/900 MHz conven- tional, trunking, paging and cellular radiotelephone site installations. Available in seven frequency ranges (see table, below), the DB860 uses Decibel's Collinear design enclosed in the DB Horizon Blue extruded fiberglass radome. A 27" (686 mm) aluminum alloy pipe at the base of the antenna facilitates mounting to platforms, towers and structures with round members to 2.25" 2 57.15 mm) OD or angle members to .5" (63.5 mm). For lightning protection, a large diameter wire conductor extends from top to bot- tom, with provisions for grounding to the tower. Extremely rugged, the anten- na will survive winds to 125 mph (201 km /hr) with .5" (12.7 mm) of icing. Design and Construction A Collinear array is used, consisting of a series of low -loss transposed flat radiators. They are enclosed in a single length of Minimum-Tip-Deflection (MTDT 3" (76.2 mm) OD fiberglass tube with .25" (6.35 mm) walls. Tip deflection in 100 mph (161 km /hr) winds is 3.1 °. All metals used in the radiator, feed and matching systems are brass, which pre- vents "signal- cells" and minimized inter - modulation within the antenna. For moisture protection, the cap at the bottom of the antenna has a moisture - sealed bulkhead N- Female connector. Removable drain plugs are provided at each end of the antenna to ensure pro- per drainage of condensation in upright inverted nverted mounting positions. The DB860 is also available with elec- trical downtilt of 3° ±1° 60° ±1 °, or 10° ±1.50°. Downtilt antenna bandwidth is limited to 25 MHz and gain is 9 dB (main lobe). Gain on the horizon is 5 ±1 dB, —2 ±2 dB, or —7 ±3 dB, 2 15 1: 1 11 —30 9 7 —30 DEM EL —15 —15 F F respectively. For other specifications consult Decibel Systems Engineering. Ordering Information Please specify exact frequency or range. Order DB860 for 10 dBd gain. For downtilt order DB860T3 for 3°, DB860T6 for 6° and DB860T10 for 10° downtilt. DB370 Mounting Kit is included. DB860 Typical Vertical Radiation Pattern VSWR vs. Frequency-MHz +15 Gain -dB vs. Frequency-MHz +15 HELIAX Is a registered trademark of Andrew Corporation +30 +30 3184 QUEBEC ST. • P.O. BOX 569610 • DALLAS TX 75356-9610 • PHONE (214)631.0310 • TELEX 73-0212 • FAX (214)631-4706 129 Mechanical Data Materials: Radome High impact molded plastic Reflector screen 606146 Radiators Aluminum alloy Mounting pipe 606146 Mounting clamps Galvanized steel Maximum exposed area (flat plate equivalent) — ft (m 2.23 (.207) Lateral thrust at 100 mph (161 km/hr) — lbs. (kg) 80.1 (36.33) Dimensions (HxWxD) — in. (mm) 42 (1067)x 20.5 (520.7)x7 (17Z8) Net weight — lbs. (kg) DB834 -A or DB834 -B 14.5 (6.58) 085080 5.0 (2.27) Shipping weight — lbs. (kg) DB834 -A or DB834 -B 165 (7.48) 085080 10.0 (4.53) Electrical Data Frequency Ranges — MHz DB834 -A 820-860 DB834 -B 869 -894 Gain (maximum) — dB 10.5±.5 Beamwidth "E" Plane (half power) 18.5 ° ±2° Beamwidth "H" Plane (half power) 105 °±5° Front -to -back ratio — dB 25 Maximum power input — watts 525 Input impedance — ohms 50 Lightning protection Direct ground Termination N- Female (fixed) HELIAX® jumper N- Male /N -Male DB834 -A 105° DIRECTIONAL ANTENNA DB 834 -B 10.5 dBd GAIN, 820.894 MHz Designed for AMPS cellular stations, these antennas provide 10.5 dBd gain in a 105° horizontal radiation pattern. The DB834 -A is made for 820 -860 MHz receive, the DB834 -B for 869 -894 MHz transmit. The antennas mount to AMPS -style monopole platforms on the unistruts. They can also be mounted on towers, poles and other structures via an optional pipe mounting kit. Design and Construction These antennas use a special phasing of four radiating elements to provide the required frequency bandwidth and horizontal and vertical radiation patterns, including a major downward lobe for additional close coverage. Eight -rod backscreens are made of high strength 6061:T6 welded aluminum -to- aluminum to minimize corrosion and unwanted electrical signals. Radiators are made of aluminum alloy and are fed via a high quality, low -loss cable harness. The one -peice radome is a molded high- impact plastic material painted in DB Horizon BlueTM color. The radome and a moisture resistant gasket are secured to an integral aluminum alloy plate with stainless steel hardware. All metals used in radiators, feed and matching systems are compatible to 43 minimize Ordering Order DB834 -A for 820 -860 MHz receive. Order DB834 -B for 869 -894 MHz transmit. DB5080 Pipe -to -Pipe Mounting Kit is optional and includes the pipe with welded angle members, four stainless steel bolts, washers and intermodulation. Information nuts and a DB365 Clamp Set to fit round pipes to 2.75" (69.85 mm) OD or angle members to 2.5 (62.5 mm). CAN BE SHIPPED UPS. I HELIAX is a registered trademark of Andrew Corp. 12 9 2.0 1.5 12 9 6 3 2.0 1.5 6 3 820 DECIBEL 0B134-A GaIn -dB vs. Frequency-MHz 830 840 850 VSWR vs. Frequency-MHz 820 830 840 850 860 DB834 -B Geln -dB vs. Frequency-MHz 870 880 890 VSWR vs. Frequency-MHz 860 860 900 Vertical Pattern 860 870 880 890 900 3184 QUEBEC ST. • P.O. BOX 569610 • DALLAS TX 75356-9610 • PHONE (214)631-0310 • TELEX 73 -0212 • FAX (214)631-4706 127 1 McCAW COMMUNICATIONS LAND USE INFORMATION BANK 1. What Is McCaw? 2. What is Cellular Communications? 3. Land Use Compatibility and Precedent. 4. Environmental /Neighborhood Impact. 5. Television /Radio Interference. 6. Tower Collapse (Monopole). 7. Tower Collapse (Guyed). 8. Site Accessibility. 9. Conflicts With Aviation. 10. Radiation Emissions /Health Effects. 11. Public Service Benefits. 12. Utility Status. 1. What Is McCaw? McCaw Cellular Communications, headquartered near Seattle, Washington, is the largest cellular telephone company in the United States. Through its regional and local subsidiaries, McCaw provides cellular telephone service to areas of the country with a total population of over 40 million people. McCaw's size and national presence create opportunities and competitive advantages not available to smaller companies, and permit the development of new technologies, improved customer service programs and favorable service rates. 2. What is Cellular Communication Cellular telephone service is a form of telecommunications capable of high quality, high capacity service to and from vehicle- mounted and hand -held radio telephones. Cellular telecommunications systems divide a region into many "cells," each covered by its own base station (an approval for one such base station is sought by this application). A base station includes a low -power transmitter, receiver and signalling equipment, and is connected to the system's computers in the service area switching office. The switching office monitors the signal strengths of calls in progress. As a caller moves away from the base station and the signal strength of a call decreases, the computers automatically switch the call to the next cell or base station, which provides a stronger signal. A large, well- designed cellular system is capable of handling thousands of calls at any time, and can provide transmission quality comparable to conventional landline telephone service. 2 Federal Communications Commission regulations of cellular service limits each market to two providers, generally an affiliate of the local landline telephone company and a private company like McCaw. 3. Land Use Compatibility and Precedent. The McCaw facility is compatible with other land uses in the vicinity of the site. Once constructed, the McCaw facility will be nearly a passive use: it produces no adverse impacts of noise, smoke or odors, it does not present a safety hazard, and it creates minimal traffic usage (1 -2 cars per week). Thus, operation of the McCaw facility will not conflict with other existing uses in the area. The McCaw facility will not create a precedent for location of other utility facilities in the area. The local zoning code recognizes that utilities like cellular systems have unique locational requirements, and for that reason may be appropriate uses in nearly any zone. In fact, each utility system has its own specific locational needs, which differ from those of other utilities. The conditions that make this site necessary for McCaw's cellular service are not necessarily compatible with the needs of other utility services. Thus, the establishment of the McCaw facility at this site will not set a precedent for other utility services in this area. 4 4. Environmental /Neighb9rhood Impacts. The McCaw facility will result in no significant impacts to the environment or to the area in which it is located. In normal operations the facility produces no noise, smoke or odors. Construction will not result in damage to any flora or fauna in the area [OR: Construction techniques and site design will ensure minimal impacts to flora and fauna in the area.] The facility is not manned and therefore normal maintenance activities require only one or two vehicle trips to the site per week. 5. Television /Radio Interference. Cellular communications is an extremely low - power use, employing only a small fraction of the power used by television and radio broadcasters. Thus, cellular . communications systems are not a source of interference with consumer electronic equipment, such as radios and televisions. Such interference tends to be caused by high - power broadcast sources, like radio and television broadcasters. The Federal Communications Commission has specific regulations and authority to deal with problems of interference from such sources. 6. Tower Collapse (Monopole). The McCaw monopole structure is designed to conform to the requirements of the Uniform Building Code and the standards of the Electronics Industries Association. These include dead -load and wind -load standards that ensure that the structure will withstand sustained winds of not less than 100 mph. In addition, monopole structures are highly stable and are resistant to damage or collapse. (Monopoles are also commonly in use for highway lighting and commercial signs.) The perimeter of the site is also fenced and secured to ensure the site will not be vandalized and to prevent accessibility of the area immediately beneath the tower to the general public. 7. Tower Collapse (Guyed). The McCaw requirements of standards of the include dead -load tower is designed to conform to the the Uniform Building Code and the Electronics Industries Association. These and wind -load standards that ensure that the structure will withstand sustained winds of not less than 100 mph. In addition, the perimeter of the site will be fenced to ensure the site will not be vandalized and to prevent accessibility of the area immediately beneath the tower to the general public. [ADD IF APPLICABLE: Experience in the tower industry demonstrates that even in the rare case of tower failure, the maximum distance from . the base of a tower that any portion of a guyed tower structure will fall is about 20 -25% of the height of the tower. A buffer area of adequate size to accommodate such a possibility is provided on the McCaw site.] 8. Site Accessibility. Access to the McCaw facility will be strictly . controlled through fencing and other means to ensure that . unauthorized individuals, children and animals do not wander through the site. 9. Conflicts With Aviation. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rules require that the location and height of proposed towers be reviewed by the FAA to prevent interference with the operations of nearby airports. The FAA had jurisdiction over proposed towers that exceed 200 feet in height, as well as smaller towers located within 20,000 feet of major airport (serving commercial and military aircraft) and 10,000 feet of a general aviation airport (serving smaller aircraft). The McCaw facility will be in full compliance with all such FAA requirements. 10. Radiation Emissions /Health Effgcts. The McCaw facility will not result in any adverse health effects based on radio frequency emissions. All microwave facilities (including radio and television broadcasting, microwave and cellular communications, ham radios, police radars, ordinary household current and consumer products like microwave ovens) emit small amounts of nonionizing electro- magnetic radiation ( "NIER "). This form of microwave energy is low in power and cannot ionize, or alter, the molecular structure of living tissue. Whether any risk to health is posed by high NIER exposure levels is a subject of controversy among some health scientists. Attention has focused on such emissions from FM radio and VHF and UHF television sources, which typically broadcast at powers of from 100,000 watts to 5 million watts. To date, there is no conclusive evidence of adverse health effects even from these high -power sources. 11 The McCaw facility will operate at a power of between 20 and 40 watts, a level tens of thousands of times less powerful t an FM and . TV facilities and only about one - thirtieth of the power of an ordinary home microwave oven (whic usually operates at 650 watts). The predicted emissio s from the McCaw facility at the base of the tower it elf will be at levels 100 to 1000 times below even the ost conservative proposed standard for such radio frequen •y emissions (i.e., one millionth of .a watt per square ce timeter). Therefore, the McCaw facility will not result in the possibility of adverse health effects to any populati • n. 11. Public Service Benefits. Cellular telephone service provides a wide variety of benefits to the public at large, beyond its obvious benefits to individual users. Cellular phones have found applications in police, emergency and health care services, providing advanced, reliable communications with officers and units in the field. Many communities have radio stations offering toll -free numbers for cellular subscribers to report dangerous road conditions, accidents and traffic tie -ups. Media reporters have adopted cellular service as a most effective means of maintaining reliable communications link with their editors. New applications of cellular technology include its use for transmitting EKG strips and other medical data to medical facilities from distant locations and in development of cellular burglar alarms. 12. Utility Status. Like other telephone communications systems, cellular facilities qualify as utilities necessary for public service. Utilities generally include private businesses, often with limited competition, which provide services essential to the public interest. Among the factors relied upon to distinguish utility uses are the degree of state and federal regulation of the use, the fact that the service is conducted in such a manner as to affect the community at large, and the unique locational requirements of the use. Cellular communications facilities meet all these tests. Cellular communications are heavily regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (although some states choose for policy reasons not to regulate rates in the industry, and allow the market to set service charges). Cellular systems affect the community at large just as regular telephone service does: its use is not limited to any particular group in the community and it supplies the public with a service of public consequence and need. 14 ..I•bor et • - \.4 TE MAR 211990 cfrF "It VICINITY MAP rItOrERTY OWNER ',URSINE OWNER 4ITE APPREV, POWER COMPANY IMP.. NOM: AU 11■70nola OUNUITOCI• Mal run= TO TOr MOMS IRCITICATIM. 2. Tilt TIMUCTIO Sn. 1110.11N AlSOUTI SIC RUM In nn mp OCTINMOCO VITO &Li run. an WM. SMUT TOSIII2oUS. a. IC uTrtUrni• Taut U Namn. Oa UMNOTATTIos UT KM Or UT. TWOS AS sum UM W. •IMMOTS• au. Of•OOTO. AMU MALL 11 MOD flit ATOM= Or TOO UTIIITUTT MUM UPO a Mang Ifs 1110=12102 Vito fa -. a. MI. MENaTM SONION. TN sumo ni.nin TO PISTON Ca_iti a Moto a. TN OM UT wormer NT Moon OulioNTIO Or UMW, WM MOTU OUSITIOW arum WM ME NoMIITO INT aLa.. If flit, TO TOT YSIMILTAIMNITI1 MT TN !WU OPIUM SIT II 124.U. DOOTICATITO S RM. S COMINKTIO• MALL MT IT UM OITIMT OIN172. OIMMITY. • It •OCOITOCT/OMITION. S. COTILCM WW1 UTen a N laTOLIT• Sin SlIt CIONOMM U In= Ilk TIE 111172.12 111■11IMMIVIR Salt W. a. aLL UOITILL 1.111.1MMI7 Taut Ot SIC T.B MINT. TO 11.0 ROTICAL. 7allsoo MT MOM So .12.fful. Milo DE. INNIS& Omoual TOIDUSO Oft OITUU INTERSTATE MOBILEPHONE COMPANY SUEET INDEX 1.Title, ZA. torrrnnent Ciii loite Irr4 EletrItion 3.11eNi14(For hiWin Permit4 4.fietlik(For uiWin Permit.) 5.5ite Survey TUKWILA Ct1L 4ITE f,INC7 (O., WA 0 101 1 17:t te ; 4.t. 435 hc-Ille WA 10101 (100) C .8 jr. olucom Toro 1 7 ; /MACE WIT TUKWILA CELL SITE • `.•-- • .041-V(rdoi,o' TiaggIltfEe#;MTAM... or- (./ALE: 1". 50' s 43.14 e: � G.M. 4T. P.4. UNION PAUFIL R.R. N 03 /Col. 273.51' N 01 13' 172.00' OA'` N01'22'20'W NOV t1'41' --- FORn 6EA -TAL r� i . N 01'2PGI ",4 0 fite. grigABIO 5:j-J 1 . NW =A. A. ...w. • MM.. MMI M. Y,. 2C.4315' re I/4 Comer hc.'2' .3B"C 2:55 ZS' to V:. C...,... 4.4.0. N' I (#1. X( ROO) ( go,. \`t' b MEM MAR 211990 i! CITY 0'r Tt�'1� IL € pjANNING DEP tLL 41T K 116 WA t I or. , e 4,..1. 3;-• n0 1 0 T 7 4' f _ CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: Install a cell base site consisting of a 100 foot tower and 3 15 -foot "whip" antennas; a 12 by 28 foot concrete shelter to house electronic equipment; and a 6 foot high chain link fence with perimeter landscaping. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) Northeast coner of South 158th Street (Longacres Way) and Nelsen Place. Quarter: SW Section: 24 Township: 23 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement.) 3. APPLICANT:* Name: Gary Wayne - Interstate Mobile Phone Company Address: 101 Elliott Avenue, Suite 435 Seattle, WA 98109 Phone. 206) 283-8319 Signature: 4. PROPERTY OWNER * The applicant i. the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVI OF OWNERSHIP SS Ar Name: Address: S7 7 (47/2O/ /47 Phone: ?- E 7 I /WE,[signature(s)] / swear that I /we are p o property involved in this app statements and answers containe correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: Date: a- ^6 contract purchaser(s) of th? on and that the foregoing this application are true and 7. ADJACENT LAND USES: CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Page 2 5. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: Northern portion used as warehouse storage/ office and parking for Rawson Drugs, southern portion is vacant. 6. PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED (from list in TMC 18.64.020): 18.64.020, subsection (12) Public Utility Station. NORTH: Rawson Drugs, John's Furniture, Mueller Brass SOUTH: Vacant EAST: Union Pacific Railroad right —of —way, Longacres racetrack WEST: Puget Sound Power & Light Transmission lines, Daniel Boone Paints, Inc., Service America Corp. 8. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE (for example, describe the manufactur- ing processes used, wholesale /retail /warehouse functions, outside storage of goods or equipment or other information which will facilitate understanding of the activities you proposed to develop on this site): Proposed use is a cellular radio base station (cell site) providing service to cellular mobile phone users. This unmanned facility consists of a 100 foot tower with 3 "whip" antennas attached to the top of the monopole; a 12 by 28 foot concrete shelter to house electronic monitoring equipment; and a chain link fence enclosing the monopole and shelter for security purposes. 9. Will the conditional use be in operation and /or a building to house the use be started within a year of issuance of the permit? Normally, the cell base site can be completed within 4 to 6 weeks after receiving a building permit. 10. Describe the manner in which you believe that your request for a Conditional Use Permit will satisfy each of the following criteria as specified in TMC 18.64 030 (attach additional sheets, if necessary). A. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. RESPONSE: See attachment to Conditional Use application. CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Page 3 B. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. RESPONSE: See attachment to Conditional Use application. C. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the sur- rounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. RESPONSE: see attachment to Conditional Use application. D. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. RESPONSE: E. All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. RESPONSE: See attachment to Conditional: Uses .application. (29 /COND.APP1,2) •,. . - _.. ' Attachment to Tukwila Conditional Use application Proposed Cellular One cell site (South 158th and Nelsen Place) January 29, 1990 A. The proposed facility will be located approximately from the West Valley Highway. The location of the proposed tower for the cell base site will be immediately to the east of the existing Puget Power Sound and Light (P.S.P. & L.) high - voltage transmission line easement. The 115 foot proposed tower is estimated to be lower in overall height than the existing P.S.P. & L. high - voltage towers and from a distance will be largely indistinguishable from the high - voltage towers. The 12 by 28 foot concrete shelter and chain link fence are consistent with industrial development existing and permitted under the M -1 zoning designation. The proposed facility will be an excellent neighbor in that it does not generate significant amounts of traffic to compete with the other uses in the area nor generate noise or odors which would impact any of the adjoining properties. ,As noted in the Section B. (Environmental Elements), response No. 7, the proposed facility generates a very low level of radio power density and will not interfere with any activities in the surrounding area. B. The proposed facility meets the existing performance standards contained in the Tukwila Zoning Code (i.e. setbacks, landscaping). C. The proposed cell base site will be unmanned. Vehicular traffic to the site except during construction will be limited to routine inspections which normally occur approximately twice a month. There are no pedestrian facilities along Nelsen Place. The proposed cell site use will not generate any foot traffic. D. There are no specific goals and policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan which address this type of utility. However, the proposal does improve the overall cellular system by increasing capacity and providing the users within the Tukwila area with improved quality of service which is a general goal of the plan for the Transportation /Utility Element of the Plan. E. The proposed site immediately to the east of Puget Sound Power & Light Company's high - voltage transmission towers allows the proposed 115 foot tower to blend in with those towers so as not to be obtrusive. This would be difficult to achieve in many other locations in the vicinity. The proposed location is behind (to the east) so that future development along the West Valley Highway (such as the new Hampton Inn facility) will not be impacted to any greater degree than exists with the present circumstance. The small 12 by 28 foot, one story concrete shelter includes an attractive exposed aggregate finish and is consistent with the existing warehouse structures in the vicinity.