Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 90-02-DR - WW GRANGER - WAREHOUSE ADDITION DESIGN REVIEW90-02-dr 7625 todd boulevard epic-7-90 ww grainger Mr. Ron Cameron May 5, 1989 Page 3 Based on the level of service analysis and Entranco's PM peak hour traffic flow observations at the Todd Boulevard /West Valley Highway intersection, we suggest the following recom- mendations to enhance the safety and operational efficiency of the intersection: o Paint the West crosswalk on Todd Boulevard o Install pedestrian signals for the West crosswalk o Stripe the eastbound approach of Todd Boulevard o Install "left only" and "right only" arrow pavement markings on the eastbound approach o Install shoulder mounted "left only" and "right only" signs for Todd Boulevard o Install identifying signal signs under the signals for the eastbound right turn, eastbound left turn, and northbound left turn movements. These would be small 12" x 18" signs. o Repaint the South crosswalk The long term improvement to the intersection would be to construct a double left -turn lane on the eastbound approach by partially removing the median on Todd Boulevard. Since the intersection currently operates and will operate at LOS C with the project generated traffic, then the intersection should be monitored with future development to determine the implementation of the improvement. - We trust that this traffic analysis for the Thompson Tile Office /Warehouse Development will assist you and Corporate Property Investors in gaining approval for their proposed project. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the information in this document, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ENTRANCO ENG Sherman D. Goo Project Engineer INC. SDG:mt Attachment: Level of Service Calculations .''TT 4H1 'c 2d.bar City of Tukwila DESIGN REVIEW 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433.1800 Gary 1. VanDusen, Mayor FILE NUMBER: 90 -2 -DR APPLICANT: WW Grainger, Inc. (Alfred Croonquist) LOCATION: 9725 Todd Boulevard NOTICE OF DECISION REQUEST: Construct a 17,700 square foot addition to existing warehouse /office /retail use. The Board of Architectural Review (BAR) conducted a review of the request. on April 26, 1990 , and approved the request with conditions (see attachment). j The■BAR adopted the Findings and Conclusions contained in the Staff Report dated April 19, 1990. Any party aggrieved by this decision may appeal in writing with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the above date and shall state the reasons for the appeal. NAME: Jack Pace TITLE: Senior Planner DATE: April 30, 1990 CONDITIONS 1. A revised site plan showing the following: a. a twenty foot wide fire lane access (with turnaround if necessary) along the east property line. On the face of . the plan, a note shall contain instructions for installing signing of access per Fire Department requirements. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised set of landscape plans to contain the following: a. Six additional deciduous trees (minimum of 1 3/4 inch caliper) to be located as follows: 3 trees located int he planting area at the northeast corner of the site between the parking area and the east property line; 3 trees located in the existing planting area at the northwest corner of the site; Five of the existing frontage trees to be relocated or replaced shall be installed in the following areas: 2 trees located in both planting areas on either side of the driveway on Todd Boulevard; 2 trees located in both planting areas on either side of the north driveway on Olympic Ave South; and 1 tree located in the planting area on the north side of the center driveway on Olympic Ave South. c. Irrigation shall be provided for all landscaped areas. -2- 3. Submittal of earth tone colors which complement the color on the 9 -08 and 9 -77 structures for the canopies, light fixtures and painted components of the cafeteria. 4. Revision of cafeteria elevations to more harmoniously incorporate tower into the overall design and incorporate the steel element into the design of the east elevation. 5. Provision of a gate on the fourth side of the trash enclosure. 6.• Submittal pedestrian light fixtures that are harmonious with proposed parking lot fixture and cafeteria design. Bruce Dees, landscape architect for Boeing, stated the Boeing Company concurs with the recommendatidns of staff. The trees along the river will be birch, willow and other trees that will blend in with the environment. George Malina, 15617 47th South, asked if the property is subject to the proposed S.A.O. and stated he favored the landscaping along the river bank. The river bank is important in Tukwila. Chairman Haggerton closed the Public Hearing at 8:23 p.m. Mr, Kirsop asked if Boeing has concerns about the revision to the cafeteria referred to in Recommendation #4. Moira Bradshaw, Associate Planner, said this recommendation refers to the "cap" on the east elevation and they have concurred on the recommendation. The Planning Department has received a letter from "Friends of the Duwamish" requesting applicant to improve the fish environment and provide public access. This will be addressed as part of the Shoreline Permit. There are ducks, heron and otter in the area. The site is not open to the public. What happens along the bank affects the fish environment. MR. KIRSOP MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE STAFF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND APPROVE 89 -16 DR: BOEING ADVANCE SYSTEMS REQUEST, SUBJECT TO THE SIX STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. 90 -2 -DR: W. W. Grainger - Request for design review approval for 17,700 square foot addition to warehouse /office /retail use located at 7625 Todd Boulevard. Chairman Haggerton stated he is a small customer of the applicant and he asked if there were any objections from anyone to his presence in this discussion. There were no objections to his presence and consideration of the subject. Jack Pace, Senior Planner, presented the staff report with the Findings and Conclusions, stating staff recommends approval of W. W. Grainger Design Review application subject to the following conditions: 1. A revised site plan showing the following: a. A 20 -foot wide fire lane access (with turnaround if necessary) along the east property line. On the face of the plan, a note shall contain instructions for installing signing of access per Fire Department requirements. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised set of landscape plans to contain the following: a. Six additional deciduous trees (minimum of 1 -3/4" caliper) to be located as follows: HEARING DATE: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: ACREAGE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: ATTACHMENTS: A. B. C. D . E. F. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Prepared April 19, 1990 April 26, 1990 90 -2 -DR W.W. Grainger, Inc. (Alfred Croonquist, Architects) Construct a 17,700 square foot addition to existing warehouse /office /retail use 9725 Todd Boulevard 2.96 acres Light Industrial C -M (Industrial Park) A Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance (MDNS) was issued on April 11, 1990 (File: EPIC -7 -90) Site Plan (Revised) Partial Floor Plan Elevations Landscape Plan (Revised) Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Staff Recommended Site Plan Modifications STAFF REPORT to the 90 -2 -DR: W.W.Grainger B.A.R. Page 2 VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION BACKGROUND FINDINGS A. Project Description: The project involves: 1. a 32 -foot high addition (a total of 21,300 square feet of space - 17,340 on the main floor, 3,960 of mezzanine), 2. the alteration of approximately 8,000 square feet of existing interior space for office /sales, 3. an expansion of the parking area to included an additional 15 spaces, and 4. additional landscaping. B. Existing Land Use: Approximately the northern three - fourths of the site is developed with a warehouse /office use containing 38,952 square feet (34,992 in warehouse and 3,960 in office). The existing facility is a tilt - up concrete structure approximately 26 feet high. C. Surrounding Land Use: The site is located in the Southcenter South Industrial Park. The industrial park fronts on the West Valley Highway at the intersection with Todd Boulevard. The subject property is surrounded by similar industrial /office /retail development. To the north (across Todd Boulevard) is the Seawest facility; to the east is the railroad spur and Unistrut Northwest facility; to the south is the Marketing Group facility; and to the west is the Sound Floor Coverings facility. D. Terrain: The site is flat. E. Access: Access to the site is from the West Valley Highway via Todd Boulevard. Existing use is a distributor of industrial supplies for the building industry and is permitted in the C -M zoning district. Existing site landscaping does not comply with current dimensional requirements and therefore legally non- conforming. Much of existing frontage landscaping is located on City right -of -way. STAFF REPORT to the 90 -2 -DR: W.W. Grainger B.A.R. Page 3 Dimension between the building and the north property line includes 4 foot bed of landscaping and just meets the minimum dimensional requirements for the parking layout. Therefore there is insufficient space to install the required 15 feet of front yard landscaping. The site and landscape plans (received 4 -9 -90) were modified after the initial submittal (received 2- 22 -90) based upon discussions with City Staff. Section 18.70.090 of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) gives the board the authority to modify the landscaping standards when in their judgement the existing and proposed landscaping meet the functional intent of the landscaping requirements. DECISION CRITERIA The applicable Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) criteria are listed below in bold, followed by pertinent findings of fact. 18.60.050 GENERAL REVIEW CRITERIA (1) Relationship of Structure to Site. a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desireable transition with streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement. b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. The addition will not alter the fundamental relationship of the structure to the site. The addition will be extended south approximately 100 feet. The front and side yard setbacks will remain the same. The number of loading bays will increase from four to seven, but remain in the same location (on the west side, adjacent to Olympic Ave South) away from the major pedestrian entry. STAFF REPORT to the 90 -2 -DR: W.W. Grainger B.A.R. Page 4 The addition will be 32 feet in height, approximately 6 feet above the existing structure, however, the proposed height is consistent with other nearby structures. The Fire Department indicates that with the addition the existing fire access is inadequate. Fire access must be provided to the rear of the property. (2) Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. a. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged. b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with established neighborhood character. d. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convience should be encouraged. e. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with should be encouraged. The exterior character of the addition will match the existing structure and is compatible with other structures in the area. An additional driveway will be added along Olympic Ave South to the south. This driveway will service the new parking area addition south of the existing truck load bays. A proposed parking stall adjoining the west property line has been eliminated and replaced with landscaping so that traffic along Olympic Ave South would not be impacted. Section 11.64.020 of the TMC requires the addition of six -feet wide sidewalks along Todd Boulevard and Olympic Ave South. (3) Landscaping and Site Treatment. a. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced. b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. STAFF REPORT to the 90 -2 -DR: W.W. Grainger B.A.R. Page 5 e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. f. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination. g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials,such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. The existing landscaping is legally non - conforming. No perimeter landscaping exists along the east property line. In addition, much of the existing perimeter landscaping is located on public right -of -way. The required installation of sidewalks will eliminate a portion of the perimeter landscaping as follows: a. The width of the landscaping along Todd Boulevard will be reduced from 15 feet to approximately 4 feet. The required width is 15 feet. Since the dimensions for the parking stalls and aisle width are currently at the minimum, there is no opportunity move the landscaping to the south. b. The width of the landscaping along Olympic Ave South will be reduced from 10 feet to approximately 3 feet. The required width is 5 feet. The dimensions for the parking stalls and traffic aisle would allow the existing landscape area to be widened an additional foot. The lineal distance from the beginning of the addition to the rear property line is approximately 150 feet. Using the standard of one tree approximately every thirty feet on center would require six trees to be planted along the east property line. Requiring strict compliance with landscaping requirements along the east property line in the vicinity of the proposed addition given the existing rail spur and the required fire access would seem impractical. STAFF REPORT to the 90 -2 -DR: W.W. Grainger B.A.R Page 6 The above condition along with the existing conditions along both streets would seem to suggest a more practical response to the compliance with landscaping requirements. The applicant on advice of the Staff revised their landscape plan to provide additional landscaping in specified areas of the site. The revised landscape plan shows only shrubs located within the proposed landscaping islands flanking the driveways. For clarification purposes, Condition # 6c of this report has been added concerning the relocation or replacement of the existing frontage trees. In addition to the condition of relocating or replacing the existing frontage landscaping within the property line, the staff recommends providing additional trees which would have been located along the east property line to the street frontage area. See Condition # 6b. of this Staff Report. (4) Building Design. a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings. b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. c. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components an ancillary parts shall be consistent anticipated life of the structure. d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. f. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. g. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. All exterior materials and finish will match the existing. All building lighting will match the existing. Although slightly higher, the addition is in scale with the existing structure. CONCLUSIONS STAFF REPORT to the 90 -2 -DR: W.W. Grainger B.A.R. Page 7 5) Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture. a. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale, b. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to the site, landscape and buildings. No additional miscellaneous structures or street furniture were proposed with this addition. 1. Railroad spur line along east property line will not allow for installation of side yard landscaping in the normal perimeter location. 2. The existing frontage landscaping to be removed due to the installation of the sidewalk should be relocated or replaced in the remaining frontage landscaping areas. 3. The proposed addition is consistent with the existing structure and site development and will not be detrimental to the surrounding area. 4. As noted by the City in the environmental review (MDNS), the recommended conditions regarding landscaping allow the opportunity to mitigate the loss of frontage landscaping due to the requirement for the installation of sidewalk. STAFF REPORT to the 90 -2 -DR: W.W. Grainger B.A.R. Page 8 RECOZMENDATIONS The Community Development Staff recommends approval of W.W. Grainger Design Review application subject to the following conditions: 1. A revised site plan showing the following: a. A twenty foot wide fire lane access (with turnaround if necessary) along the east property line. On the face of the plan, a note shall contain instructions for installing signing of access per Fire Department requirements. 2. The applicant shall submit a revised set of landscape plans to contain the following: a. Six additional deciduous trees (minimum of 1- 3/4 inch caliper) to be located as follows: 3 trees located in the planting area at the northeast corner of the site between the parking area and the east property line; 3 trees located in the existing planting area at the northwest corner of the site; b. Five of the existing frontage trees to be relocated or replaced shall be installed in the following areas: 2 trees located in both planting areas on either side of the driveway on Todd Boulevard; 2 trees located in both planting areas on either side of the north driveway on Olympic Ave South; and 1 tree located in the planting area on the north side of the center driveway on Olympic Ave South. c. Irrigation shall be provided for all landscaped areas. m z ft*-0c.- `e:r■ V' TUKWILA WASHINGTON W. W. GRAINGER SOUTHCENTER SOUTH INDUSTRIAL PARK —C No Is. 14 S +LI/ DRAWING INDIX SHEMIT A I A A - A - - A A • • 9".• 9. • * S. 4 Vito4 CO:7' 4 1 1 . 0 e-g-AL M"re' ILAin W20- 1...1 4 0. 4.42.17 Ait.A hoar_ rife* UMI. COmsti3Orl r 2•••1.••■ 4Pi44•0.•8 444 1:79. , f - o9 fgt4.1.2.4,Lho CV!, flA1.Or 4.4.1 ■2041,7pir 0.07 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4a-AL 0 WI • Twat-Lac ••■• lbw 6..“.• 111.07 1...a 1.1 t .1 1.1•1. 2.••■•conawl ttttt tal• •• : ::: :::::: " " GENERAL NOTES I. !ow. ,,,,,, •Il 1.osoon w.f.. ca... WI. Lowe.. wet. fows1 LoogroAtoe swl wwowto .0 on las •I I ...b., we/ wows of row. for wow/I 44 •10‘.4.11 mow.. CO/ofefal1 carmen of wow, wIls• a. foot • Ls wow.1 W tio• of not wow. W waws/I iffl.■ flasfol foe ....own C, moo / 1. MI tuff oalls we Ww/ 1/..• stowoN An. volo. V. Waf•I (wt.. mull fon. ow onto. wow. fwfactoo goo 1./.• ofw. Swortwot Itonfloorn wW% 1.. All Woo if•loWs ,,,,, . wolf •• NI' ChM 10. I.% wo wow. swIl foefwv to • • L. WO. Mg) If Lot./ *tan, •••• w• Iwo. Mel le /WOW ofr ••••••••••••1•1 017owl lo.o. wow. /awry WWI. lowwo fa. Iroolw .4wfolin 1./1.). to of woe Www, we us f tor f.. ad. .707. ••• 11•••••01••• •••■••• •••11 ••..1.1110/4••‘••■•••■•• row. ow... VICINITY MAP W.W. OSUUNGING ADDITIONS / ALTSRATIONS SOLITHICSNOIN S. INOUSTSIAL PARK TUICWILA WASHINGTON ALF11110 CIPIOONCILIIBT APICHITIOCTII ow WON MUMS INALCINO non 3140.1 so t." sawrna viriamerroat srutv ■aasmar-eama OE 2 a. a. ONWrnk Geo. %Cot 4.10rithm NW{ t rONPf O'er, tricto.NN Ofulpte.N1 W.* CS. UINTA.) Nen. N.- NUJ ONO MA AN AL TO *Ow- t r N., • SW hoar ov.cffiNNO 121.1L- rAKTIAL F !IAN 9 ® ts-lVf NEW utaw.xls rAv, rr. V tz.z7NINF rLAN, 01010 0110t 10.1.1 —a I ,•••• INle W W 6.-it,^4tAE _ Arr Met4 _ kanUTHCEICIENAcuTh 6a-fl' ALFRED CSIDONOUNIT ARCHITECTS ONO UNION NOINUM SUILDINO SUIT. 340. UU*TtL. eST0 1 ININ001M-11.00 NMI MN 2 So Co) ••••••• 1 . • • r — • 1 NAV!: • NO‹.TH l-eVAT ON ;2) 501.1TH E:-ENAT ION Ara. d WEST .1....t-VAT ION ( e••••••■••■ r oo Ar exAvARI-o-toovrwor \_A AT t.1-t-VAT I ON 04' (6:1 ELI g000r. ao.o. 14.7.0r 1 4 ■•••.c• 3 f r { .L. OLL .r. .. r 'PI•N170 egtrfp =10:1 Q Wan ma 10 1•*0-1nO.O. 41 !Lt■ W Feglet-V *. CENTEre. * ISrlooThlot r TUKWILA KroltoW-Terl ALFRED CROONSUIST ARCHITECTS OW .SON SONJAIIIO IMALOMO2 *ATI 3404 INIAT71.0 WOISMONSTON OrOl OW 3 Imo- 0 .....• • 1 . . • . U I 1 . IC I i So Co) ••••••• 1 . • • r — • 1 NAV!: • NO‹.TH l-eVAT ON ;2) 501.1TH E:-ENAT ION Ara. d WEST .1....t-VAT ION ( e••••••■••■ r oo Ar exAvARI-o-toovrwor \_A AT t.1-t-VAT I ON 04' (6:1 ELI g000r. ao.o. 14.7.0r 1 4 ■•••.c• 3 f r { .L. OLL .r. .. r 'PI•N170 egtrfp =10:1 Q Wan ma 10 1•*0-1nO.O. 41 !Lt■ W Feglet-V *. CENTEre. * ISrlooThlot r TUKWILA KroltoW-Terl ALFRED CROONSUIST ARCHITECTS OW .SON SONJAIIIO IMALOMO2 *ATI 3404 INIAT71.0 WOISMONSTON OrOl OW 3 I - 1 1•0.1•C Wa Own.. wlw•.s mown ago ilM7tlw 1WRONDOrJ •t•rn• Na.1,8. WIMYrV ,dahod '14f1>UkfCNI H01 Y31..N394.i1W 4,N711bara.nd / 44OI.LI0av If39NIVa19 M M • nr.wr a»N1 09 .9 a bU - 111110.01 • o 0.1.+ lgt fl.. 7 hA -R Aj ••• vaaca•• k 9.1_ see a *wr V.aor+ – 444141.4 .n M snUv a* 1>war •••+J . u'L.vt Z ;; `T'1 U �rvila nr• E % V.: .01111 •6QF o •awl —0 0 r •ov �„w�n MZ.r• : n uns-ro N01j100V 9 +70YM ar•■•E• Warm NV'U - 901d9eigNd1 0' 0.0., 0 .104 NOM •9■10'11M 4Nr191 •3 LEL lir KY K+wra9 0 Dog 76 it DATE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: APPLICANT: FILE REFERENCE: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW RECORD ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL DESIGN FEATURES CITY OF TUKWILA MITIGATED DECLARATION OF NON SIGNIFICANCE W.W. Grainger Addition April 9 1990 To construct a square foot addition to an existing warehouse /office /retail use. 7625 Todd Boulevard W.W. Grainger, Inc. (Alfred Croonquist, Architects) EPIC -7 -90 and 90 -2 -DR THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: This is a Mitigated Declaration of Non - Significance The environmental review consisted of analysis based on the following documents included in the environmental record: Development plans (sheets 1 - 3) Landscape plans (sheet 1) Environmental Checklist (February 2, 1990) There has been no previous environmental review for this project. The proposal includes the construction of a 17,700 square foot addition to an existing warehouse /office /retail structure, modifications of existing front entry, a•15 stall expansion of the existing parking, and additional landscaping. To accomplish the proposal the following actions will be required: Importing of approximately 2,700 cubic yards of fill. Construction addition. Construction interior alterations and add new entry at northwest corner of structure. Construct expansion to parking area providing additional 15 parking spaces. Provide new landscaping along a portion Olympic Ave South and adjacent to new entry. Exterior of addition will include tilt -up concrete walls painted to match existing color, adding building lighting to match ATTACHMENT E P. 2 /MDNS, EPIC -7 -90/ W.W. Grainger, Inc. Addition existing, adding a new main entry which includes the use of low - reflective glazing. PERMITS REQUIRED * Design Review approval * Grading permit * Building Permit * Street Use /Utility permits * Potential Developer's Agreement (off -site improvements) CHECKLIST ITEMS A. WATER Existing surface water runoff from the site drains into the P -5 channel. The existing on -site stormwater runoff drainage control system does not include oil /water separators in the catch basins. This allows pollutants to enter the City's drainage system. Providing retro -fit oil /water separators on site at the northwest of the property before discharge into the City's drainage system would mitigate the entry of the pollutants. See Condition # 4. In addition, during heavy rains "ponding" due to drainage from railroad line occurs at the southeast corner of the site. Adding fill to raise the undeveloped portion of the site and the additional structure will remove a portion of the "ponding" area requiring a diversion of the runoff into the City's drainage system. Development plans should include provisions (biofiltration swales and /or piping) for this storm water runoff. See Condition # 5. B. TRANSPORTATION The intersection of West Valley Highway /Todd Boulevard currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) C. The proposal is not expected to reduce that LOS, however, the intersection is currently experiencing traffic, queuing, and turning movement problems. There are no sidewalks in the immediate vicinity requiring pedestrians (based on field observation) to use existing roadways creating unsafe conditions. Section 11.64.020 of the Tukwila Muncipal Code (TMC) requires the installation of sidewalks upon the substantial remodel (increasing the floor area by at least twenty percent) of an existing structure. The proposed addition represents an increase in floor area of forty -five percent. To mitigate the impacts of increased traffic, the installation of sidewalks along the site's frontage will be required. See Condition # 11. P. 3 /MDNS, EPIC -7 -90/ W.W. Grainger, Inc. Addition To mitigate impacts of increased traffic, a number of specific measures to enhance safety and operational efficiency of the West Valley Highway /Todd Boulevard intersection should be required. These measures include establishing or repainting crosswalks, installing directional signs for vehicular traffic, installing turning movement signs, and striping. They have been identified in the Entranco investigation and are listed in condition # 10. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Issuance of a Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance is appropriate since the environmental review indicates some impact, but no probability of significant adverse environmental impacts from the proposal. The mitigation provided as part of the proposal includes: An addition to the existing storm drainage system was proposed to provide drainage from the parking lot expansion. Additional Mitigation required of the proposal includes: A. AIR 1. To mitigate adverse air quality impacts of construction during dry weather, the construction area shall be watered to suppress dust and the roadways flushed. B. WATER 2. To mitigate adverse impacts to water quality from siltation impacts, temporary siltation control measures shall be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 3. To mitigate adverse water quality impacts to the storm water system from sedimentation•, tire cleaning provisions shall be made and any existing catch basins where mud is likely to collect should be protected by filter fabric. 4. Existing catch basin at the northwest corner of site shall be retro- fitted or replaced with an oil /water separator. 5. To mitigate the loss of "ponding" area for storm water runoff from railroad track, the development plans shall include the provision of biofiltration swales and /or piping of runoff into the City's storm drainage system. 6. All building roof drainspouts and footing drains shall C. NOISE D. PLANTS P. 4 /MDNS, EPIC -7 -90/ W.W. Grainger, Inc. Addition be directly connected to the main storm water runoff control system or otherwise approved by the Public Works Department. 7. The contractor shall provide certification that all diesel, gasoline, and air - powered equipment is properly muffled or silenced. 8. Proposed new trees shall not be planted in compacted soil unless gravel drain sumps are installed under each tree or the subgrade soil is rototilled. 9. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department for review and approval a revised Landscape Plan with the required landscaping shown on the property. The plans shall include irrigation plans and a survey by a licensed land surveyor of existing street trees located along the frontage (including the type, size and location of those existing trees) and the proposed location of the new sidewalk. The applicant shall either relocate the existing street trees or replace them with same size or comparable tree volume into the required landscaping areas along the City right -of -way. The timing of the relocation of the plant material (especially the trees) shall be based upon the recommendation of a registered landscape architect and conducted under their supervision. See Condition # 11. E. TRANSPORTATION 10. The following off -site traffic improvements shall be required: a. Paint the West crosswalk on Todd Boulevard at West Valley Highway. b. Install pedestrian signals for the West crosswalk on Todd Boulevard at West Valley Highway. c. Repaint the South crosswalk on the West Valley Highway at Todd Boulevard. d. Stripe the eastbound approach for two lanes on Todd Boulevard at West Valley Highway. e. Install "Left Only" and "Left or Right" (option) P. 5 /MDNS, EPIC -7 -90/ W.W. Grainger, Inc. Addition pavement markings on Todd Boulevard for the eastbound approach. f. Install shoulder mounted "Left Only" and "Left or Right" (option) signs on Todd Boulevard for eastbound approach. g. Install identifying signal signs under the signals or on span wire on Todd Boulevard for the eastbound "Left Only" and the "Left or Right" (option) turn movements. These signs should be 12" x 18 ". h. Install indentifying signal sign under signal or on span wire on West Valley Highway for northbound "Left Only" turn movement. i. Revise existing signal heads at Todd Boulevard as follows: 1) Replace existing green ball lens with green left arrow lens in northerly (left) signal head. 2) Add new section with green left arrow lens at bottom of the existing southerly (right) signal head to make a four - station head. 11. The applicant shall install per City Standards a 6 -foot wide sidewalk on the perimeter of the site adjoining public right -of -way (Todd Boulevard and Olympic Ave South) . This condition may require the removal of portions of existing landscaping along both Todd Boulevard and Olympic Ave South. See Condition # 9. 12. A Right -of -Way Permit shall be required for off -site construction activities. The Permit shall specify traffic control measures and haul routes for fill material. f 4 4 4 4 i i a 4 I I I • 4 I • 4 I I p 4 • f • e • a • i i • i • Jr x 1 i r � i-lk \_ a z 4 C p 0 0 0 0 o p�, ° ,i ; 0 -I F° 4 t r i.- (CFI . ® E , � � i � a a ▪ �� 2 2 3 .t s { t i _[..1 Q= i !I r O -i i , ,., . 1 , 11111 ii n . , iia � 5 cc : , .:. • 04 , l i . 1 l• A 'Sa '.�i I it 1 911 Ai _ - ' tli 7 ®111111 ii, I 3 (1711~4•411 MA% Sgla14 t o• 4IdoW NV1J iaus Q'3d NsWwo7 - ) & V1$ N • ..• • 1•.1 • i J • 4 April 9, 1990 City of Tukwila . 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 APR 91 • 5,)'PIC.; . i ALFRED CROONQUIST ARCHITECTS _ ..._ -- --- -- - OIVE UNION SQUARE BUILDING • SUITE 3404 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 ' (206) 682 -2690 Attn: Mr. Mike Aippersbach Mr. Jack Pace, Director of Planning Subj: W. W. Grainger Addition Gentlemen: In accordance with your request at our meeting of last Friday, I am submitting the following on behalf of W. W. Grainger, Inc. 1. FIRE LANE The owner's intent is to provide a fire lane access on the east side of the building. The owner will pursue an agreement with the building owner to the east to develop a joint use fire lane. 2. LANDSCAPING Landscaping plan has been revised and will be subject to approval prior to issuance of a Grade and Fill Permit. 3. PRELOAD The preload proposal is to include preload to the south property line under this contract. Please see attached soils recommendations prepared by GEO Engineers. 4. MICROWAVE DISH The owner has requested the placement of a microwave dish on the building roof. The placement of this dish will be reviewed for aesthetics. Please advise if you wish further information or clarification. ALFRED CROONQUIST ARCHITECTS Alf ed H. Croonquist, .I.A. Attachment 0 1 topetr44 a a es.mmemi•nall■ •••• A H111•11•17,,■=11•11M.,104•141..ANITMA 1ii1 // // / // --roarf [-PA •44, WEE citrwvi^7 COI I I I 4 ?('1'- 649c,. 38:41: 'r i j,g e RoOF 50 -0 50 -0 o wrimHimaA17.... 1 .11.tata'iraM5iLiPMEnt71/1. How .411120 .00 P 64e 01•146v0 0 \lel\ 00 Hesgor I t:Mr. ` op.k, s0•.0• 2 !Wm,. 1144.1Z17 ARA i7 gle. NEt 151} Le Z . V W }E. 4.44 W.41401.e. 4.o•nlf.. fsP4sOf . +4 I- pulun,,r oV.f_A • taflost. v.sr, 70t4rMICA+ &05404f. leaf t»p....cf raiLaNgf lyre =t-4 PEaatev 01_4/0[.• ,* Ler 002240. U1041150 141[.. 4 =1 4 ,41= = LaLltiCAL• 10" r.,1 /c•orlm4. NOM, NM 10— 24.1 1111161-} s LEGAL OESCSIIPT1ON 0, -rore4:0e1-,4121 i5 14744 47,1 fer7 ter/ ?IA.,- 4,7,:m14t. *Arm Jt.laisOCAS/.. mgr. 0054e4e0 1.4 4.01.411E. or? ef ,•WrIpoo Mo 54,1144104 •'? -or CO W 0 1 44 .1 104 *luirlY... IN ez 4 t,f.144.4.1141rop-1 GENERAL. NOTES *41 .tutuf ..144 811 Mout= =A NOM. caoStims Woos SO14100.4.. *al fmarsour coonnono ono on Imo all Om.. da ours moot. as n11411.01 for oar tut owl *WM 4104.mt. O.I. oil umol 1 4/. A• I. All mot t1.11 soofoe4 .1113h11 Lan INC nnolotloo. =.1 L fInt oullsolyers 4.1.C. (MS la fauna). /. All otol oollo ad oortItlosa. ft* spoon. 0411 fa fin Masi ••• ea. • *0 Ostrom, Moll ISMS.. 100411 Nand ...WU. Om •••••• Onoo■ Pa. uloa. III. mot aosstlen. •lootesal tuosfamon sot On Wan. 1 1U. WI.. self, 00111* steboll oar MA Wm.. U. Colt *We 11•191.0. SAllit mews la ...LC. WU. 1.21310. Cmoleto 0. atom. Or not's*. oorlsoloos oatiololollor its... Siall as ao1•11.1•11 lailsols 411•Mt m• moms, of 110015.1.•• yr, aol %alms Some, hat, Oktool..1. goorolog rift DNIVIIMi. In. loon. orinot num. tostmelloo Isolura 401 So oatonato• alerfootly for nal. onsovalo. u. assooto4, olostosso o oso ots. Ono* ftos000nsta 0411 le oarIttas nor menu onsft... IS 11414.114% of roof ...no to r. aqinat 4o11tor5 [Wool Of not aUtStano Mortal nabohn ICI or hat. • Inewarv MAP 62203n4tLei i.rusirgAl—PPI`K 'ritt w^016144 luicwiLA ALFRED CIECIONIEURT ARCHITECTS CHM UNION =ELM= 111.1111.01■•• •11.W11 11.10.1 11114.711611111/JOWITIN 011003111111••1110 • N y w.,ny, ta. t �L „hAM �i.. 1 f .t .MMNe�11i j!� v .y � N. q �1!•v (�W w H n .. ♦ j 'j�� ' ; �1 a� 'p/t�� y _�� n „ �• ' •, tH i .t0 t` ; ��. ew�/ 'f N�j :. � o • . r � 1 i t �,i! y� l� • � � ': •^:$.".".:*; • . r yyA "1 b �.r P• , �� .,n•, � ..� ”" . y.►'"' �; 14 •»f.`u..r.+gR•n'�A±rw�s!f�w+n: �.:,� "'`ad �j..� t feed erempisf 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: xito - U � ,uoiv�q. We VIM 2. PROJECT COCATIO . (Give street address or, i vac t, indicate lot(s), block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) 3. APPLICANT;* Signature: .tt brand tax transmittal memo 7671 I a of pave. • / DE,,I 3N REVIEW APPLfC ATI ''N 1990 FEB 2� Name: Address: Phone: Date: i141 * The applicant is the person w the staff will contact regarding the application, and to who all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulate by applicant: U , 57' srotti -� • Gi/GVe49/aXacl� rhona alb N AFPIOAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY Name: OWNER Address: Phone: I /WE,Csignature(s)1 Swear that we are a owner s or con rad p rc • ser s o t property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: - - 14D ge 1d i The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each cri- terion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, use extra space on last page or use blank paper to complete response and attach to this form. 5. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of*each building should be considered in relation to it site. ' DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 2 6. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the estab- lished neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on - site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. ib Awn 1 lay ut lehrir '=ervle, per, Ihgtutw 1 IitNti ri ceK *ts ' wr.* 1 h ,lo eael elidr4d ne44#kt etioTvvr-e.Vdlitcolariztuf reisiagthan 4:41-mulateri jo ologolyile4 411° ti ctiaraPeAcriedi 4t? -9th Velitauld40 GireUltift bit vb alestgne4 41tito covirli10111411 Wri14 dosh t circulation. A 2.01%. wide dinvemui added -hr 1I1.44 , aae ware RESPONSE: 7. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 3 A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be un- sightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. i • i . _� - �. If • , a . _■l_ / • .1 RESPONSE: the t-e4ei,t ad n11 od or to axeewirrieetat caak 1( tone 4 "tina's I r 4 GDNgrl4e v4pQ . 4k' tio 8. BUILDING DESIGN DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 4 A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with per - ma ent neighboring developments. C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fix- tures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. RESPONSE: Th 41 1 2 tI M1 4 sti a a 4 4I .6,VIIALi►i - .•. -, ■c.. I /.r tip 41 014/so •oulhout dllag t "arc 141 the W t up Gores w41 01* email WL wattow cTYeu rarer_ jam a.s View +tos, walf) 1 2:4 ebae er}i -u f ure Gx,ra41.l I1. 9. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and pro- portions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furni- ture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. RESPONSE: RE/rt. O1frAtea.61 c INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 5 The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appear- ance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people- oriented use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth. Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this District. Use additional response space, if necessary. 10. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area. N• A�, 11. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities. N. A 12. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site pedestrian circulation. N. A. 13. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complementary to the district in which it is located. 14. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse environmental impacts. N. A. 15. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features in the area. N. A (29 /DSGN.APP1 -3) DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 6 T ry PAR ct- ,.A„ (5o84 O Fr) w 4SN MEE 10" D.B.Q. /TOG Ke'R s -- I A . D2cENr NSvsE 21 J� 1 GAR Al E ? OILS_ — I ... fieolegry LAN EES /PENCE : _• PAR CEL "8 (4617 SGT P-r) 43 11' conic. ORIvEWAY r I SAN Jos 4LF °CAIN 1' I P RoPaSEb OII°oPEXTV LIME Loc.4TE AcL Ex1JTiNy 1ZEES k„.■• ■,,0r/1 fAuNK o IgM6Tenc OF 10" OK MORE min 81' TYPICAL SITE PLAN ILLUSTRATING QUALITY FOR APPLICATIONS I SCAce '/1b " = / ' o" O 4 8 IL ido NAME .. A N !!,..1.•!•?4,1,,t,r.r.1•••> ss•••14;:4;,•-•,,,,,• ,1224110. 1119„":,.• A • J,01,9,1111 • — S. ,. 190TH .; ST. SS „ 47 w „,„ ,t. NE 2- 22- 4 • • - , , 3 , • a 04Zi, ",tf- i '" I', 47, • ts/esyeer. " 1:4 .k,;;).;,•••• 12 •P" ••"••9:.;