HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 90-03-SPE - WALLACE ENTERPRISE - WHITCO SENSITIVE AREA WAIVER90-03-spe 3700 115th street
11215 east marginal way south
whitco
January 22, 1990
7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER and
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
CITIZEN'S COMMENTS
Recycling
CONSENT AGENDA
OLD BUSINESS
Amend Agenda by deleting
Item B, relating to Civil
Service
Pr
LA
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
MINUTES
Scott
the recy
was well .
interesting
recycling.
solid waste
specific sugg
that the City d
and implement
burning be di
encouraged.
Tukwila City Hall
Council Chambers
Mayor Van Dusencalled the Special Meeting of the Tukwila City
Council to order and led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
E DUFFIE; DENNIS ROBERTSON; JOAN HERNANDEZ, Council
sident; CLARENCE MORIWAKI; ALLAN EKBERG; STEVE
RENCE; WALLY RANTS.
ngle, resident of Tukwila, thanked the City for starting on
ling information process. The Wednesday night meeting
ended. Rebecca Fox and Craig Benton put on a very
resentation. There were a lot of people interested in
r. Nangle presented Council a report on the current
isposal system in Tukwila, and he included . some
stions for a better solid w - e utility. He suggested
p the twice yearly free co pon for garbage disposal
n on -call bulky goods • sposal program, that open
(lowed, and that a rate incentive program be
George Melina. 1 • 7
Cleanup Program s • • nso
who do not normally - e
Scott Nangle comment
save garbage until the
might address part of
ch
a. Approval of Vo ers
47th Ave.
red
thin
Claims Fund Vouchers #
Gener Fund
City eet
Wat r Fund
Seyier Fund
Foster Golf Course
Surface Water
Equipment Rental
I r
r VED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY H -
ONSENT AGENDA BE APPROVED AS SU
f The vouchers being approved are the first fo
*MOTION CARRIED.
, endorsed the Spring and Fall
b the City. It helps those individuals
s to the dump.
the Program encourages people to
ee dump period. A bulky item pickup
roblem.
2727 - #42918 (January, 1990)
$243,081.93
11,187.11
4,394.00
67,844.34
20,895.64
175.48
1 =1
920.31
NANDEZ, THAT THE
MITTED.*
990.
MOVED BY HERNANDEZ, SECONDED BY ROBERTSON, THAT "B"
BE DELETED BECAUSE ALL OF THE ISSUES HAVE NOT BEEN
RESOLVED.*
Item B is an Ordinance relating to the Civil Service Commission.
*MOTION CARRIED.
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL, SPECIAL MEETING
January 22, 1990
Page 3
OLD BUSINESS - Cont.
Wallace (Whitco) petition for
waiver (continued from
1/15/90)
just a way to get additional time. ` That doesn't seem like a
hardship. The, CRITICAL AREA SENSITIVE AREA OVERLAY, as it is drafted speaks specifically to hillsides;
that is a hillside, there is no doubt about it. Some of those slopes
are probably 90° and this is well beyond 40°.
Council Member Robertson said he is against the motion. Go
ahead with the SEPA process and see what issues are raised.
They may be so severe that it will materially change their
development or make it financially not feasible. The SEPA
processes can do that, especially when the proposed development
has such a dramatic impact as this one does; it is essentially
moving a hill and creating a cliff. By granting this, we are still not
allowing any rock to be removed. When the SEPA process is done,
it is still coming back to Council. This will give us more time to '
develop the SAO and consider the question of how to treat rock or
whether we are even going to treat rock different than dirt.
Council Member Rants said he will not vote to allow the applicant to
excavate the hillside until all questions are answered and this can
be done through the SEPA process.
Rick Beeler, Planning Director, explained that interested citizens
have a right to appeal a decision on the SEPA process to the City
Council. If they require an Environmental Impact Statement there
could be some public hearings giving a chance for everyone to
comment.
Council President Hemandez said she will not vote in favor of the
motion because she would like to know the outcome of the SEPA
process. I don't see any harm in letting them go ahead with the
SEPA process because there will be no excavation allowed during
that time, and we will get the answers to our questions.
Council Member Moriwaki commented that the request has
changed since last week. In a memorandum the 'applicant offers
technical expertise for the SAO process, but this seems like it is
only a , special interest for the applicant to have the . SAO deal with
his property in a favorable light. There is no guarantee that when
the SEPA process is completed, before the moratorium is over, and
the SAO has a whole new multitude of issues that weren't
addressed during the SEPA process, where are you because you
have already approved this document.
*MOTION FAILED WITH DUFFIE AND MORIWAKI VOTING YES.
MOVED BY ROBERTSON, SECONDED BY RANTS, THAT
COUNCIL GRANT A WAIVER FOR THE SEPA PROCESS ONLY.*
Council Member Robertson explained that if we do this, they can go
ahead with the SEPA process, then the Planning Director will decide
if it is non - significant or not. The applicant will get a better view of
the scope and cost of his project. There may be some test drillings
done during this process, but this is the only activity that will take
place on the site.
Council Member Lawrence asked if Council grants the waiver, can
they proceed with the installation of the fence. Mr. Beeler thought
that would be permissible.
Council Member Ekberg asked if in considering the waiver for the
SEPA process only, does it include the issue of making it subject to
filing an agreement to conform to the adopted Sensitive Areas
Ordinance and to process the application at ' his risk and expense?
He wanted to be sure this was included.
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL, SPECIAL MEETING
January 22, 1990
Page 2
OLD BUSINESS - Cont.
V / Wallace (Whitco) petition for
waiver (continued from
1/15/90)
The Whitco petition for waiver from the moratorium under the
Sensitive Areas Ordinance was continued from the Regular Meeting
of January 15, 1990.
Mayor Van Dusen asked if there was any new information from
members of the audience.
Bob O'Connal, 1009 Minor Ave. East, Seattle, is speaking for Mr.
White. They have met with City Staff in an attempt to resolve the
problem. It has been recommended that they request the waiver
on the SEPA (State Environmental Policy. Act) process and then
come back to Council for a waiver on the grading permit at a later
date.
Rick Beeler, Planning. Director, explained that several months ago
he required an Environmental Impact Statement to be prepared for
this application. The applicant has been preparing supplemental
information working to resolve the issues so he could get a
mitigated determination of non - significance. They were close to
making the final decision when the moratorium was imposed.
Roger Baker, audience, stated he is against allowing them to
proceed with excavation under the conditions they have now.
Daniel Arrigon, 4610 So. 124th, said he is representing citizens from
the hillside. He expressed some of their concerns. The Sensitive
Area Ordinance doesn't say anything about rock. The waiver
should not be granted as the Whitco Company has not shown
financial or personal hardship. If Council approves this now, it will
be easier for other applicants to get approval. One of their biggest
concerns is the steepness of the hill. If they cut the hillside more
than 40% they are causing a hazard for the children in the area;
knowing children, they are going to try and climb it. If they started
cutting into the hill and get into softer soil, what is going to happen?
Connie Hoffman, 3924 So. 114th, commented that she lives on the
hill in question. She quoted from testimony. Mr. White had given
about financial hardship they will suffer if the waiver is not granted.
When Mr. White purchased this property, it was in King County but
was in the process of being annexed to . Tukwila. He should have
planned for this. He should have realized the process with Tukwila
would be different than King County. Mr. White cited three ways a
waiver would benefit the City. (1) Dedication of the river bank area
to the City. This Property lies within the 200 feet of the river and falls
under the Shoreline Management Act. (2) Improvement of utilities
to the area. The area has its own utilities and would not benefit
from Whitco's installation. (3) Increase the tax base in Tukwila.
The City already has a good tax base and there are more than
46,000 jobs in the City because of the development. She was told
that the residents of the City come first. She asked Council to
proceed slowly with this development. The only value this will give
to the community is cosmetic. It will be the first thing you see when
you enter our City. ft is important to us what the final grade of the
hill is going to be.
Milton Smith, Attorney for Whitco, offered to answer any questions.
MOVED BY MORIWAKI, ' SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT COUNCIL
DENY THE WHITCO REQUEST FOR WAIVER FROM THE
SENSITIVE AREA ORDINANCE.*
Council Member Moriwaki said the points for granting the waiver
have not been adequately expressed. Emergency and hardship
have been briefly mentioned. It looks like the request for waiver is
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL, SPECIAL MEETING
January 22, 1990
Page 4
OLD BUSINESS - Cont.
Wallace (Whitco) petition for
waiver (continued from
1/15/90)
Resolution #1130
Recognizing the bond
issues for the South Central
and Highline School
Districts.
ADJOURNMENT
8:27 p.m.
MOVED BY LAWRENCE, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT THE
MOTION BE AMENDED THAT A TEMPORARY FENCE BE
CONSTRUCTED AS PLANNED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE
PROPERTY FOR SAFETY. MOTION CARRIED.
MOVED BY ROBERTSON, SECONDED BY HERNANDEZ, THAT
THE MOTION BE AMENDED TO INCLUDE THE WAIVER
REQUEST IS SUBJECT TO FIUNG AN AGREEMENT TO
CONFORM TO THE ADOPTED SENSITIVE AREAS ORDINANCE
AND TO PROCESS THE APPLICATION AT HIS RISK AND
EXPENSE. MOTION CARRIED.
Bill Scheffler suggested that the result of the SEPA process be
posted on the property. to give the people in the area a chance to
*MOTION CARRIED AS AMENDED WITH MORIWAKI AND DUFFIE
VOTING NO.
MOVED BY MORIWAKI, . SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT THE
PROPOSED RESOLUTION BE READ BY TITLE ONLY. MOTION
CARRIED.
City Attorney Colgrove read a resolution of the . City of Tukwila,
Washington, expressing support for the passage of school bond
issues in the Highline and South Central School Districts.
MOVED BY MORIWAKI, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT
RESOLUTION NO. 1130 BE ADOPTED AS READ. MOTION
CARRIED.
MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY HERNANDEZ, THAT THE
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL. ADJOURN
AND THAT COUNCIL GO INTO A COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
MEETING:
Gary L. Van Dusen, Mayor
Ma An derson City lerk
Minutes - Regular Meeting
January 15, 1990
Page 5
Request for Waiver -
Wallace Enterprises,
aka Whitco
MOVED BY MORIWAKI, SECONDED BY LAWRENCE THAT
COUNCIL DENY THE WAIVER REQUEST OF FLOYD HUNT.*
Councilman Robertson stated that he supports the motion because in
his opinion the applicant has failed to show any significant impact of
the four month waiver. The Sensitive Areas Ordinance and the
tentative Clearing and Grading Ordinance are intended to deal with
property such as this. The plan to completely clear this property over
six years would impact the esthetics of the roperty in that it is visible
property and is on a sensitive area (hillside). Also, there are
significant engineering questions regarding storm water runoff.
*MOTION CARRIED. THE WAIVER REQUEST OF FLOYD
HUNT IS DENIED.
RECESS A brief recess was called by Mayor VanDusen. The meeting was
9:10 - 9:20 p.m. resumed at 9:20 p.m. will Councilmembers present as listed above.
The public meeting to hear the waiver request of Wallace En_ terprises,
aka Whitco, was opened by Mayor VanDusen at 9:20 p.m. Egg
rises,
Rick Beeler reported that the property is at the NW corner
of So. 115th Street and the Seattle right -of -way which abuts East
Marginal Way. The applicant has applied for a clearing and grading
permit to cut an existing rock hillside approximately 70 feet high,
remove 154,820 cubic yards of material and install 8,800 cubic yards of
landfill. The property is zoned M -1. The applicant wants to make the
site available for future commercial development. The impact of the
Sensitive Areas Ordinance as drafted at this time would be to not
permit development of slopes over 40 percent. The slope on the
hillside is now over 40 percent. The environmental review was close to
being completed when the moratorium was imposed. The slope that
would result from the • roposal would be near vertical and the rock
face would be -. • • . • The applicant would be willing to not develop
the top of the Mr. Beeler commented that normally his
department would recommend that if the Council approved the waiver
requirement, the applicant sign the agreement to conform to the
adopted SAO and process the a . lication at his own risk and expense.
However, there may be some . ' . ' culty in restoring the near vertical
rock face to conform to the pre - grading slope.
James White spoke on behalf of Wallace Enterprises. He reported
that the property was purchased as M - with plans to build
warehouses on the site. At this time they are applying for a grading
permit only. The grade of the slide level of the warehouses is about 20
feet and the elevation at the top of the cut is 70 feet. It is Mr. White's
opinion that this project would provide some improvement benefit to
the general area.
Bob O'Connell, 2009 Minor Ave. East, and Ralph Bieberman,
geotechnical engineer residing at 400 No. 34th Street, represented the
applicant. Mr. O'Connell clarified that the top of the rock elevation is
approximately 136 feet and the top of the slope is approximately 90
. feet —He explained that -this proposal began in King County in May of
1988. The DNS process was close to being approved by King County
at the time of annexation to Tukwila in March of 1989. They have
been going through SEPA review and plan review with the City since
p April of last year. Mr. O'Connell believes the topography of over 60
e rcent of Mr. White's property will be within the SAO. y He feels if
they are unable to get relief from the ordinance, this property,will be
functionally undevelopable. Mr. O'Connell noted that extensive soils
work has been done on this site, and in order to stabilize the slope, a
good deal of material will have to be moved.
Councilman Duffle asked what King County's primary concern was
regarding the site development. Mr. O'Connell responded that the
pnmary concern was blasting. He stated that they have removed
blasting as a condition of doing the rock removal on the site.
Minutes - Regular Meeting
January 15, 1990
Page 6
V Wallace Enterprises Ralph Bieberman, 400 No. 34th St, project eotechnical engineer,
Waiver Request (con't) concurred with Mr. O'Connell. g
Councilman Robertson questioned why the applicant was willing to
continue if he felt that 60 percent of the development would fall under
the SAO and that the SAO as presently constituted would prevent
development of the property as currently planned. He added that if a
waiver was granted, it would be subject to the applicant filing an
agreement to conform to the adopted SAO and processing the
application at the applicant's own risk and expense.
Mr. O'Connell commented that he would like to propose an
alternative to the waiver request that would be based upon the
ordinance as written. The applicant feels that the City should approve
the waiver to allow completion of the SEPA review for issuance of the .
grade and fill permit subject to special provisions and conditions for
rock slopes stability. The original Sensitive Areas Ordinance did not
differentiate between soils types and materials types in its slopes.
Councilman Lawrence questioned how far into the base of the toe on
the northwest side the applicant intended to cut. Mr. Bieberman
produced maps to answer Councilman Lawrence's question.
Councilman Lawrence commented that it appeared the applicant
plans to move more rock than is necessary to stabilize the slope, thus
creating a larger area to build on. Mr. O'Connell agreed that the lot
does become bigger.
Carol Watson, resident at 3906 So. 113th Street, spoke in support of
the development.
Warren Wing, 11850 - 42nd Ave. So., commented that he also
supports the development but is opposed to truck traffic on So. 115th
Street.
Ralph Hatten, 3935 So. 113th Street, stated he was not against the
development but he is against blasting in that area
Stan Hoffman, 3924 So. 114th Street, commented that he is against
granting the waiver request.
Dorothy DeRodas, 3910 So. 114th Street, voiced her concerns
regarding blasting on the site.
In response to Mrs. DeRodas' questions, Mr. O'Connell stated that
they plan to use a big "CAT' with large rippers to remove the rock.
Blasting will not be done.
Mayor VanDusen closed the public meeting at 10:30 p.m.
MOVED BY HERNANDEZ., SECONDED BY DUFFLE, THAT
THE WALLACE ENTERPRISES WAIVER REQUEST BE
CONTINUED FOR ONE WEEK.'
Councilman Robertson commented that he would like to view the site
and look at it from the surrounding property and roads.
Councilman Rants stated that he preferred to vote on the waiver this
evening and have the applicant wait until the SAO is completed.
Councilman Moriwaki noted that by the engineer's estimate the rocks
on the site are thousands of_years old and may have some geological
and scientific significance. He suggests this should be considered when
the rocks are cut.
Councilman Lawrence agreed with the motion to continue. He
suggested that the applicant mark the hillside at the point of the cut to
be made.
Minutes - Regular Meeting
January 15, 1990
Page 7
Request for Waiver -
Goldstar Acquisitions, Inc.
NEW BUSINESS
REPORTS
*MOTION CARRIED. THE WAIVER REQUEST OF WALLACE
ENTERPRISES IS CONTINUED FOR ONE WEEK.
The public meeting was opened at 10:26 p.m.
DCD Director Rick Beeler reported that the following corrections
regarding the degree of slope on the property: The overall slope of
the property is 19 percent; next to the road there is a horizontal area
of about six feet where the property slopes approximately 30 percent.
Mr. explained that the applicant proposes to re- locate an existing
house onto an existing single family lot. He added that this area would
not come under the SAO as it is now written.
Ron Ewart, President of Goldstar Acquisitions, 340 Mt. McKinley Dr.
S. W., reported that he must have the house on the site by January 31.
Mayor VanDusen closed the public meeting at 10:47 p.m.
MOVED BY HERNANDEZ, SECONDED BY ROBERTSON,
THAT THE WAIVER REQUEST OF GOLDSTAR
ACQUISITIONS, INC. BE GRANTED.*
Councilman Robertson commented that the lot appears to be
marginal in its impact of the SAO. He does not believe this property
fits under the intent of the SAO or the moratorium.
*MOTION CARRIED. THE WAIVER REQUEST OF
GOLDSTAR ACQUISITIONS, INC. IS GRANTED.
MOVED BY MORIWAKI, SECONDED BY DUFFLE, THAT THE
PROPOSED RESOLUTION BE READ BY TITLE ONLY.
MOTION CARRIED.
Attorney. Colgrove read a Resolution of the City of Tukwila,
Washington, declaring an emergency for various street repairs, caused
by heavy rains, and authorizing emergency expenditures.
MOVED BY MORIWAKI, SECONDED BY DUFFLE, THAT
RESOLUTION NO.1129 BE APPROVED AS READ.*
Mayor VanDusen praised City employees and City crews for. the
excellent job they did handling the emergencies caused by the
excessive rains on January 9.
*MOTION CARRIED.
Mayor VanDusen reported that he had accepted the resignation of
Karen Robertson from the Parks Commission.
Council President Hernandez reported that the BRB had set the
boundary for the Cascade View annexation back to 128th but gave the
City a border line of commercial property along Pacific Highway
South. This will allow our Fire and Police Department to maintain
control of both sides of Higinwey_99.
Councilman Moriwaki commented that he had been asked to serve as
a board member on the Childcare Resource and Referral Committee.
Minutes - Regular Meeting
January 15, 1990
Page 8
M.1.21LIINMEEE
11:06 p.m.
MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY MORIWAKI, THAT THE
MEETING BE ADJOURNED. MOTION CARRIED.
Gary L Van Dusen, Mayor
J tu, Deputy Citytlerk
Ms. Maxine Anderson
City Clerk
CITY OF TUKWILA
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Dear Ms. Anderson:
WALLACE ENTERPRISES
aka WHITCO
P. 0. Box 3767
Seattle, Washington 98124
January 5, 1990
Re: Whitco Property Moratorium Waiver Petition
We have reviewed the provisions and conditions of
City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 1550 and based on the intent
of this ordinance Mr. Elmer J. White, Sr. of Wallace Enter-
prises, owner of that property, commonly known as the Whitco
property, subject of Grading Permit Application EPIC- 16 -89,
petitions the City Council of Tukwila to grant a waiver and .
exception to the development moratorium established by City
of Tukwila Ordinance No. 1544. This exception and waiver
is requested under Ordinance No. 1550, Section 3, adding
a new subparagraph E to Section 2 of Ordinance No. 1544.
The subject property is a 10.3 +/- acre parcel of
land lying between South 112th and 115th Street right-of-
ways, west of C.D. Hillman's Meadow Gardens Addition and
east of the Seattle City Light Right -of -Way (formerly the
Seattle- Tacoma Interurban Right -of -Way). This parcel is
zoned MH. A grading permit for this parcel was applied for
through King County on May 12, 1988. King County processed
and reviewed the permit and had determined in. February of
1989 that subject to final review, approval of the permit
to grade and fill this site could be granted. It was at
this time that jurisdiction of the permit passed from King
County to the City of Tukwila (official transfer date March
31, 1989). Per instruction and with help . from both city
and county officials, the grading permit file and application
was formally given to the. City of Tukwila for processing
on April 26, 1989. The permit application was processed
and reviewed by City staff and was within two weeks of com-
pletion when the City took the moratorium action of Ordinance
No. 1544. It should be noted that extensive efforts had
been made to mitigate City of Tukwila SEPA Environmental
Ms. Maxine Anderson
City of Tukwila
January 5, 1990
Page two
Concerns during the permit process. We understood these
mitigations were leading to a recommendation of approval
at the time of the moratorium.
This petition is requested for the following reasons:
1. While Mr. White's property does have topographic features
that may come within the definition of Paragraph C of
City Ordinance No. 1544 for slopes steeper than 15 %,
these slopes are rock faces. It had been the intent
to grade these slopes to remove hazardous and loose frac-
tured rocks to stabilize slopes in conjunction with both
owner and City soils consultant findings. The grading
was meant to provide a safe and level area below the
slopes on which to develop an office and warehouse site
in accordance with current zoning. There has been no
application made to the City or County to develop on
or above the existing or stabilized slope areas. It
is our belief that this slope stabilization is consistent
with Paragraph G of City Ordinance No. 1550 and in the
best interest of the citizens of Tukwila. Excavation
will be conducted in accordance with the excavation plan
drawings submitted. Excavation will occur entirely on
the Whitco property and will not affect neighboring prop-
erties.
2. This grading and any subsequent development proposals
have met and will comply with all SEPA and ordinance
conditions of the City of Tukwila and therefore not im-
pair environmental quality.
3. That as noted in the brief recap of events above, we
have suffered significant hardship and delay to obtain
this permit. The delay has been due to conditions total-
ly beyond our control and has caused many thousands of
dollars of additional expense to get as close to permit
approval as we were prior to the moratorium. If this
waiver is not granted, we will be subject to considerably
more financial hardship from increasing development
costs, lost revenues, and potential liability by those
trespassers who regularly vandalize this property with
motorized vehicles.
4. That by allowing this development . to proceed, the City
of Tukwila will benefit by the following measures:
Ms. Maxine Anderson
City of Tukwila
January 5, 1990
Page three
c. an increased tax base.
a. dedication of river bank area to the City for river .
bank stabilization and recreation,
b. improvements to utilize in the area, and
Based on all the above, we feel that in the best in-
terest of the City and citizens of Tukwila an exception and
waiver to City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 1544 should be grant-
ed. We seek the earliest hearing and consideration of this
petition. Please advise us if we will be scheduled on the
agenda for the City Council meeting on Monday, January 8,
or some other date.
Sincerely,
;84! [. ; l 1,G' °e
Elmer J. White, Sr. for
Wallace Enterprises
aka Whitco
PETITIONER: Wallace Enterprises aka Whitco
PROPERTY LOCATION: 10.3 acre parcel bounded by S. 115th Street, the 112th
Street right -of -way, Seattle City Light right -of -way and C.D. Hillman's
Meadow Gardens Addition.
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: To cut 154,820 cubic yards and fill 8,800 cubic yards
in order to level an M -1 zoned property for future commercial development.
EFFECT OF MORATORIUM:
Cit 'of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433.1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
STAFF REPORT
TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Applicant submitted an Environmental Checklist and Grading /Fill application
on May 24, 1989.
On August 25, 1989, the SEPA Responsible Official issued a Determination of
Significance thereby requirintg an environmental impact statement.
Additional information was provided, but review by the Responsible Official
was stopped by the moratorium.
Proposed slopes are 2 :1 transitioning to .5:1 horizontal to vertical.
II1PACT OF SENSITIVE AREAS ORDINANCE:
The Draft SAO performance standards for sloping property discuss preserving
hillsides and minimizing excavation. The proposal is to excavate the
hillside to produce a level future potential development site, while
leaving a near vertical face on the hillside. Slopes over 40% are not to
be developed according to the draft SAO.
Ordinance 1550 requires the applicant to file an agreement to conform to
the fianlly adopted SAO and to accept the risk and expense of that
conformance. Because of the severity of the proposed slope, potential
restoration or a alternation per the final SAO may be very difficult to
attain.
DECISION CRITERIA:
1. Intent of the moratorium
2. Best interests of the City weighed against the interests of the
individual.
3. Circumstances and hardship caused by the moratorium
4. Damage that could result from strict adherence to the moratorium.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Vicini Map
2. Site Plan
S40.N le Iola
iw •'•If it Lela
galp
M2
r
46
Li
1 _ - •
• is
I ddS
•
0.0 O . 11,,.
.y
i,
•
�I �tq� qua
tin4 ,.,
T f I
t.O1,.1s. L LiirMrJ sour a�1. •�uJ
r 412
♦. II.' * WT
%tab C•JNT7 * WII4J,J•T11.1
/V. cf..)
n■
ORn
; t
•
1
L
I
11 !"1.111
I I 1: 1 1: 1 :41 1 8 1 :4 1 : 1 6 ! !! , ; !I
I I I �� ail t loess I t � ;1!
I ! Ij ;q 11�i11 t l;,;
! iiI i !'��i `! Iel i ! I
• ' ;'1 I !Pr
• IIII• i 1 I i ! I_! I ibl it � _
�•": BUSH. ROED 8 HITCHINGS, INC.
CITY OF TUKWILA
WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. /5
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, CLARIFYING AND AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 1544 ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM
ON DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY,
DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND SETTING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council, on November 20, 1989, passed Ordinance No.
1544 declaring a moratorium on development on properties described as sensitive
areas, and
WHEREAS, questions have been raised as to the Council's intent indefining
"Development' and in describing the area affected by the moratorium, and
WHEREAS, the moratorium appears to work unnecessary hardship on certain
property owners or developers who had applications or processes pending on the
effective date of the moratorium which applications or processes were not specifically
excepted from the operation of the moratorium, and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to clarify and amend Ordinance No. 1544 to
cure these uncertainties and hardships, and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 1544 was passed as an emergency ordinance
effective immediately and to prevent the hardships referred to, it is necessary that this
ordinance be effective immediately.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Clarification of Definition of "Development." It was and is specifically
intended by the City Council that the definition of "Development' contained in Section
1.B of Ordinance No. 1544 be construed as broadly as possible to include all processes
relating to land use, specifically including but not limited to those mentioned in
Ordinance No. 1544, SEPA applications and Board of Architectural Review applications.
Section 2. Clarification and Amendment of Desistnation of Property Affected. It
was and is specifically intended by the City Council that the moratorium apply to all
parcels containing a "sensitive area" and not that it apply only to the "sensitive area"
itself. In furtherance of this clarification, Sections 2.A and D of Ordinance No. 1544 are
amended to read in full as follows:
A. No development shall be permitted to occur on any parcel of property in
Tukwila, Washington, containing any area designated as a sensitive area or as
open space during the moratorium which is established by this ordinance.
No permits allowing such development shall be issued during such
moratorium.
D. All applications for development specifically including, but not limited to, new
permit applications, rezones, or plats (regular or short) on any property in
Tukwila, Washington, described in paragraph A above, submitted during this
moratorium shall be refused and not processed until this moratorium has
terminated.
Section 3. Specific Conditional Exceptions. There shall be added to Section 2 of
Ordinance No. 1544 new paragraphs E, F and G as follows:
E. In addition to Paragraph C above, all development for which there were
specific applications pending on November 20, 1989, and which do not
impact the "sensitive area" or its "buffer" as those terms are defined in the
October 25, 1989 Sensitive Area Ordinance, may continue to be processed
during the period of the moratorium provided the applicant and the property
owner, if different from the applicant, execute for recording an agreement that
all such continued processes be subject to the provisions of any Sensitive
Areas Ordinance passed before the termination of this moratorium and
acknowledging that such is continued at their request and at their risk and
expense. The agreement must also state that it is understood that regardless
of the continuation of such pending processes, application or requests for
any other processes required for the project but not specifically applied for by
5:00 p.m. November 20, 1989, will not be accepted or processed during the ,
moratorium period, unless. it is clear on the face of such applications that the
process applied for will not impact such "sensitive areas" or "buffers" except
that under no circumstances will a new application for a building permit be
accepted.
For those who feel the moratorium on their property is creating an undue
hardship for financial, personal, or other reasons, they may petition in writing
to the City Council. A date for the Council to hear that petition will be set by
the Council President. In considering the petition, the Council will bear in
mind the intent of the moratorium; the best interests of the City weighed
against the interests of the individual; the circumstances and hardship caused
by the moratorium; and the damage that could result from strict adherence to
the moratorium.
F. An additional exception to the moratorium shall be granted to those 12,000
square feet or lesser sized R -1 properties which are already developed with a
single family home.
G. An exception process is hereby established for any property owner for whom
the moratorium prohibits acting on an issue that constitutes a hazard or threat
to the safety of people or property.
1. The applicant shall submit an exception request to the Director of
Community Development, explaining the threat to persons or property, the
expected results from inaction, and a plan for dealing with the threat.
2. The Director of Community Development shall consider the exception
appeal, and may require scientific, technical or other reports for
verification of the hazard.
3. The Director of Community Development shall respond to the request for
exception within three business days of receiving both the exception
application and any additional information requested. If immediate
response is dictated by the circumstances of the emergency, a more
timely response will be given.
a. In no case will an exception be given for wholesale clearing and /or
grading of property, but this amendment is intended only to allow
action such as the removal of hazardous vegetation such as trees.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage as an emergency ordinance in order to amend
Ordinance No. 1544, which establishes a moratorium on development on certain
prooperty within the City.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at
a Regular Meeting thereof this /' day of ,1989.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFI9EEpF THE CITT ATT RF EY:
By (0(
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: /a - /9 - .Y 9
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL; /2 - / fl 2'
PUBLISHED: /. - '1 y 9
EFFECTIVE DATE: I • / - 9e
ORDINANCE NO.: /5
(
CITY OF TUKWILA
WASHINGTON /
ORDINANCE NO. /S 7'� 9
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON
DEVELOPMENT ON CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN THE
CITY, DECLARING AN EMERGENCY AND FIXING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the current zoning and land use
regulations of the City of Tukwila relating to certain areas within the City are inadequate to
protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens and the environmental quality of such
areas, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has referred the issue of further land use regulations
for such areas (referred to as "sensitive areas") to the Planning Commission for
consideration and public hearing, and
WHEREAS, the SEPA Responsible Officer for the City has made a determination
that such further regulations would not have a significant adverse impact on the
environment and has issued a DNS with regard thereto, which determination is currently
the subject of certain appeals, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a first public hearing on such issues
on November 9, 1989, and
WHEREAS, on November 7, 1989, voters approved a King County bond issue to
authorize the acquisition of certain property located within the boundaries of the City of
Tukwila for open space, and the Planning Commission and the City Council need adequate
time for careful consideration of and input to the "sensitive areas' ordinance, and time to
allow acquisition of the bond open space areas, and
WHEREAS, the SEPA Responsible Official for the City has determined that such a
moratorium is exempt from SEPA procedures pursuant to WAC 197 -11- 800(20), and
WHEREAS, after notice duly given, a public hearing on the issue of a moratorium
was held before the City Council on November 13, 1989, at which time all those wishing to
speak were heard, and
WHEREAS, action must be taken immediately to avoid an imminent threat of public
health, safety, and welfare and to prevent an imminent threat of serious environmental
degradation pending final action by the City Council and King County.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Definitions.
A. "Moratorium" shall mean a time period of six months from the effective date of
this ordinance during which no development shall be permitted.
B. "Development" shall include any clearing, grading, filling, building, or any similar
or related land use activity whether or not any permit or prior approval is required, and
shall include any activity or procedure for which application must be made to any
department or board of the City of Tukwila.
C. "Sensitive Area" means any wetlands, watercourses, slopes steeper than 15 %,
landslide hazard areas, and abandoned coal mine areas, all as defined in the Draft Sensitive
Areas Ordinance dated October 25, 1989, on file at the Tukwila Department of Community
Development.
D. "Open Space" means those areas in Tukwila designated in the King County bond
issue approved by election on November 7, 1989, a description of which is on file with the
City Clerk which description is hereby incorporated herein.
Section 2. General Requirements.
A. No development shall be permitted to occur in any area designated as a sensitive
area or as open space during the moratorium which is established by this ordinance. No
permits allowing such development shall be issued during such moratorium.
B. The moratorium established herewith shall be temporary in nature, shall
commence on the effective date of this ordinance, and shall run until midnight on May 13,
1990, unless sooner ended or extended by action of the City Council.
C. The moratorium shall not prohibit development for which the necessary final
building or subdivision or short plat permits or approvals have been obtained prior to the
effective date of this ordinance or for which completed applications for a building ermit or
for a subdivision or short plat have been filed with the appropriate officials of the City prior
to such date.
D. All applications for development specifically including, but not limited to, new
permit applications, rezones, or plats (regular or short) in a sensitive area or open space
area submitted during this moratorium, shall be refused and not processed until this
moratorium has terminated.
Section 3. Severabilit'. If any portion of this ordinance is found or rendered invalid
or ineffective, all remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 4. Penalty. The general penalties provided for in the Tukwila Municipal
Code shall apply to any violations of this ordinance, and any person, firm, corporation, or
association failing to comply with any of the provisions hereof shall be deemed guilty of a
misdemeanor.
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force
immediately upon its passage as an emergency ordinance in order to consider and adopt
new land use regulations for sensitive and open space areas.
PASSED BY THE CITY C UNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, THIS ,� a DAY OF ,1989.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
7att:n
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
By
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: /1 d D - 8 9
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL; i I - . o - 9
PUBLISHED: /I - .2 / - $' 9
EFFECTIVE DATE: / / - d2 ! ' Y 1
ORDINANCE NO.: /5-4 V
s r ir" • usen, • ayor