The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit 90-06-DR - MITHUM PARTNERS - SOUTHCENTER PLAZA DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DESIGN REVIEW90-6-dr 393 strander boulevard Permit 90-06-DR - MITHUM PARTNERS - SOUTHCENTER PLAZA DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DESIGN REVIEW TUKWILA POND SITE WITHDRAWN MITHU PART N E R S March 2, 1990 Dear Jack: Mr. Jack Pace Planning Department City of Tukwila 6200 South Center Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 In this submittal we are proposing an amendment to the City of Tukwila B.A.R. conditions concerning the dumpster:.locations at South Center Plaza. We have studied many solutions to deal with garbage coming from Zoopa restaurant. The kitchen process demands that waste and supplies do not intermix. Therefore, two doors on opposite sides of the kitchen are needed., Zoopa is prepared to cart the trash ± 80 feet. To cart the trash across drive lanes on through parked cars .would not be a practical solution during the course of the next 10 years. Enclosed is the required information for this submittal We . have studied this problem for many months and .believe' it is a strong design solution that would meet the city's design goals. Sincerely, Vince Ferrese, AIA Vice President Enclosure cc: Walter Kaczynski 624L ARCHITECTURE PLANNING .& INTERIOR DESIGN 2000 112TH AVE NE BELLEVUE WA 98004 (206) 454 3344 FAX(206)646 4776 DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: /k2 Aff Z J x.bzwp. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and subdivision; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) 6 W. d lnsed On �✓!� r�Y>r�a West t frame.4 sa. Quarter: Section: Township: Range: 3. APPLICANT :* Name: Signatur (This information may be found on your tax statement.) Address: MdhuM ors / 4,1e/04 Z65v Uzth Aw NE Ad/owe lit 9elo/ * The applicant s the person whom the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. - AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY Name: OWNER A Address: c7/5 ,1� 2 .5e r ��yy/6 Phone: — le 1 #$3-44 I /WE,Csignature(s)] swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of tho property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my /our �0 knowledge and belief. Date: 3•;•• ' . The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each cri- terion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, use extra space on last page or use blank paper to complete response and attach to this form. 5. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site. RESPONSE: vAlt 6475 dew), 75 7'27 .f7AZU4 4/0,75:4V7 G DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 2 !yells 6 74 6. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the estab- lished neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety,. efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. fir' RESPONSE: jl,Zfh i rGt c1',0/71 Gl' 45 �� * - r tz v h , aim k, 4 *gin, 0,-W aG 4,Y5,, 4 o w 514 Agee,.‘ ID o 4507 a7 ¢h orkz orb & 1 xlielot .N ' ce 7. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 3 A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be un- sightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. GYa o� sa�lr i Aad 0/ a3�rr� frevts* bra z 4 757- bnse. 7 Qp As 'hi ¢oCIOV of l i d RESPONSE: ✓iG,�. , # -L. ilP4 . iii i.u! .• A owe / hpro7 412.1 c/027703-- 8. BUILDING DESIGN - DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 4 A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with per - ma ent neighboring developments. C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural. concept. Fix- tures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. / t :11 ri 1J iii►, d " % #/ d! i.Lir ! -,Al/!/_; / G�IiL.Ci L 7 Ai /224 RESPONSE: hi1freit d % *p7 /,S • AGild ei 4' Ai 1 ?1/? One /Aver *Zee AW/eA 1 9 l ) 1 ( L / W✓'iM ilk 11; 6 OnG G ', CenT 7 7 A01 6L4'` 4I ' 410. / / /ii Ai.-4 MI #ii a A.zds. Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc. lend PlounIng, Survey 6 InyInvoring Spotlallair ..... 114,0 al". ID•DD ..... 114111 110 111 /1 111•O• D.s. Ser Sp akar Partnere 015 1111th AVENUE LE. BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 93005 Mk 1 SIN Plan SOUTNCENTER PLAZA VICINITY MAP DUMPSTER PLAN. NOTE: SEE SI -3 FOR LOCATION ON SITE ff.,1-EvA o ld s Nor- Gaeta GM 1.k CAP lep:W GA/2; ,ir /rltse-o � v N 4 'r t-D,Ze /gar' / , NAN-7 cam r l_- .f\kt.DA rt. FLt.\N ■ T 1;0" 4- I r - r I !� GATE DETAIL • e . ) . , SECTION _ a ' '€ l'142ZP•5' 1' Nr) INST,LL NEW THERM PLA TIC CROSSWALK NEW, STO BARS 1-- co IX w Q a ct w > u) 0 z CB IST. 8" WIDE WHI PAINT STRIP x 55' LONG DOUBLE . 4" WIDE /— YELLOW PAINT STRIP ES x t(5' LONG 22 2 u 2' - -- 6 ...NORMAL CROWN @ CENTERLINE BI F.F IP T P iY 114 2 NEW CB - BLDG. B FF =26.00 i P i INTERSECTION DET. - WHEELCHAIR INTERSECTION cq RAMP 7 SITE ENTRANCE AT ANDOVER PARK WEST SCALE: 1" - 20' 60 LF 10 TEMPORARY TRANSITION TAPER 1 F 1 ::